alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022202EN.01000801.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/8

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25 January 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88028 |
| Decision No | 012/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 Tax deferrals scheme for undertakings operating a restaurant |
| Legal basis | Act No 2/2022 amending the Act on withholding of tax on public duties No 45/1987 and the Act on Social Security Contributions No 113/1990 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To compensate those undertakings that operate restaurants with a license to serve alcoholic beverages that have been subject to restrictions in opening hours, due to the measures taken by the Government as a response to the spreading of the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Deferrals of tax and social security contributions |
| Budget | The deferrals of public duties under the scheme are estimated at ISK 500 – 1 000 million (approx. EUR 3,4 – 6,8 million) |
| Duration | The granting of aid under the measure shall be completed on 1 June 2022 and the deferred tax shall be paid in full by 15 February 2023 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Icelandic Revenue and Customs |
| Tryggvagata 19 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

25 January 2022

Case No

88028

Decision No

012/22/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 Tax deferrals scheme for undertakings operating a restaurant

Legal basis

Act No 2/2022 amending the Act on withholding of tax on public duties No 45/1987 and the Act on Social Security Contributions No 113/1990

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To compensate those undertakings that operate restaurants with a license to serve alcoholic beverages that have been subject to restrictions in opening hours, due to the measures taken by the Government as a response to the spreading of the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Deferrals of tax and social security contributions

Budget

The deferrals of public duties under the scheme are estimated at ISK 500 – 1 000 million (approx. EUR 3,4 – 6,8 million)

Duration

The granting of aid under the measure shall be completed on 1 June 2022 and the deferred tax shall be paid in full by 15 February 2023

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

The Icelandic Revenue and Customs

Tryggvagata 19

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2019322EN.01000401.xml

| 26.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/4

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2019/C 322/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 10 July 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 83590 |
| Decision No | : | 057/19/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | eHealth |
| Form of aid | : | No aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

10 July 2019

Case No

:

83590

Decision No

:

057/19/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

eHealth

Form of aid

:

No aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
Días de pago de beneficios de Seguro Social en el 2009

ENERO 2009

30

FEBRERO 2009

27

MARZO 2009

ABRIL 2009

1

MAYO 2009

1

JUNIO 2009

1

31

JULIO 2009

1

AGOSTO 2009 SEPTIEMBRE 2009

1

OCTUBRE 2009

1

30

D L M M J V S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

NOVIEMBRE 2009

31

DICIEMBRE 2009

1

Días de pago de beneficios de Seguro Social en el 2009

Segundo miércoles 1 al 10

Tercer miércoles 11 al 20

Cuarto miércoles 21 al 31

Se pagan beneficios el Fecha de 

nacimiento del Seguridad de Ingreso Suplementario (SSI, sus siglas en inglés) 

Beneficiarios que recibían beneficios antes de mayo de 1997 

o reciben ambos beneficios de Seguro Social y pagos de SSI

Por favor permita al correo tres días adicionales antes de comunicarse con 

la Administración del Seguro Social para informar que no ha recibido su pago.

Social Security Administration

SSA Publication No. 05-10931

(Schedule Of Social Security Benefit Payments 2009)

ICN 483780

Unit of Issue - HD (one hundred)

January 2009 (Destroy prior editions)
Exhibit 11
                         THERMO INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS INC.

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                                                    Three Months Ended
                                              -----------------------------
                                                 March 29,        March 30,
                                                      1997             1996
   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of Fully Diluted Earnings
     per Share:

   Income:
     Net income                               $ 33,587,000     $ 34,043,000

     Add: Convertible obligation interest,
          net of tax                             2,031,000        1,348,000
                                              ------------     ------------
     Income applicable to common stock
       assuming full dilution (a)             $ 35,618,000     $ 35,391,000
                                              ------------     ------------
   Shares:
     Weighted average shares outstanding        97,070,515       91,874,948

     Add: Shares issuable from assumed
          conversion of convertible
          obligations                           13,462,151       14,445,711

          Shares issuable from assumed
          exercise of options (as determined
          by the application of the treasury
          stock method)                            909,225          948,346
                                              ------------     ------------
     Weighted average shares outstanding,
       as adjusted (b)                         111,441,891      107,269,005
                                              ------------     ------------
   Fully Diluted Earnings per Share (a)/(b)   $        .32     $        .33
                                              ============     ============
# C_2012384EN.01001301.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/13

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for three EFTA States applicable as from 1 September 2012

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004
   (1)
  )

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004

1

)

2012/C 384/11

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008 (2). To get the applicable reference rate, appropriate margins have to be added in accordance with the State aid Guidelines. For the discount rate this means that the appropriate margin of 100 basis points has to be added to the base rate. The recovery rate will also normally be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate as foreseen in the Authority’s Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 (3) amending the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (4).

2

3

4

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2012-31.5.2012 | 4,70 | 0,31 | 3,57 |
| 1.6.2012-31.7.2012 | 4,70 | 0,38 | 3,57 |
| 1.8.2012-31.8.2012 | 5,90 | 0,38 | 3,57 |
| 1.9.2012- | 5,90 | 0,38 | 2,95 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2012-31.5.2012

4,70

0,31

3,57

1.6.2012-31.7.2012

4,70

0,38

3,57

1.8.2012-31.8.2012

5,90

0,38

3,57

1.9.2012-

5,90

0,38

2,95

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 105, 21.4.2011, p. 32 and in the EEA Supplement No 23, 21.4.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 340, 22.12.2010, p. 1 and in the EEA Supplement No 72, 22.12.2010, p. 1.

3

(4)  See consolidated version on: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/decisions/195-04-COL.pdf

4

---
## PATRIOT ARCHIVE 1974-2018

## Patriot Archive by Decade

1974 - 1979          1980 - 1989         1990 - 1999          2000 - 2009         2010 - 2018

## First Issue - 1974

## 50th Anniversary

## Online Magazines

**Air Force** - Airman Magazine**Air Force Reserve** - Citizen Airman Magazine**Army** - Soldiers**Marine Corps** - Marines**Navy** - Navy**Coast Guard** - USCG
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                     PAGE 1 OF 1

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Thomas Group, Inc.
Irving, Texas

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8/S-3 (Registration
No. 33-71752) of our report dated March 10, 1998, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Thomas Group, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.





                                             BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Dallas, Texas
April 14, 1998
§ 264b.9 Enforcement. ( a ) The Administrative Governor, after consultation with the General Counsel, must report to the Attorney General cases in which there is reason to believe that a Board employee has violated the Act.
( b ) The Attorney General may bring a civil action in any district court of the United States against a Board employee who knowingly solicits or accepts a gift from a foreign government in violation of the Act, or who fails to deposit or report such a gift as required by the Act. The court may assess a maximum penalty of the retail value of a gift improperly solicited or received plus $5,000.
429 A.2d 659

#### Allan N. LASHNER, Appellant, v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 21, 1979.

Filed May 8, 1981.

*550Ronald H. Surkin, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Peter A. Galante, Philadelphia, submitted a brief on behalf of appellee.

Before CERCONE, President Judge, and WATKINS and HOFFMAN, JJ.

CERCONE, President Judge:

Factually, this case involves a dispute over an “all areas” contract to demolish certain buildings in the City of Philadelphia. Procedurally, the matter arises from an action in assumpsit which was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on March 23, 1973, by Allan Lashner, appellant, against the Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia (hereinafter Redevelopment Authority), appellee. Preliminary objections to the complaint were filed by the Redevelopment Authority and dismissed on May 30,1973. Thereafter, the Redevelopment Authority filed an answer and new matter. Lashner replied to the new matter and the case was at issue. A non-jury trial was held before the Honorable Lawrence Prattis on October 4 and 5, 1977. On October 19, 1977, Judge Prattis entered findings of fact and conclusions of law denying Lashner’s claims in their entirety. Lashner then filed exceptions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law, which exceptions were overruled on August 16, 1978, after full briefing and oral argument. In an order dated August 16, 1978, Judge Prattis adopted the earlier findings of fact and conclusions of law as his final *551order. Appellant took his appeal from this August 16, 1978, order of court. As this appeal was taken to our Court without final judgment having been entered, the appeal will be quashed.1

Just recently we noted that an order dismissing exceptions following a trial without jury is akin to an order refusing a new trial and that it is unappealable. *Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay, supra,*283 Pa.Super. at 558, 424 A.2d 950. *See also Slaseman v. Myers,*285 Pa.Super. 167, 427 A.2d 165 (1981). According to the mandate of Pa.R.A.P. 301(c), such an order “shall be reduced to judgment and docketed before an appeal is taken.” Where the lower court grants or denies relief but fails either to enter judgment or to order the prothonotary to do so, judgment is to be entered upon praecipe of any party. *See*Pa.R.C.P. 1039 and Pa.R. A.P. 301(d). Having failed to comply with the procedural requisites for an appealable order, this appeal is quashed.

The appeal is quashed.

1

. Because the appealability of an order concerns the jurisdiction of an appellate court, it may be raised, as here, *sua sponte. Penstan Supply Inc. v. Hay,*283 Pa.Super. 558, 424 A.2d 950 (1981); *Williams v. Williams,*253 Pa.Super. 444, 385 A.2d 422 (1978); 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 704(b)(2).
# C_2005040EN.01001401.xml

| 17.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/14

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Frostating lagmannsrett by decision of that court of 23 April 2004 in the case of Fokus Bank ASA v Staten v/Skattedirektoratet

(Case E-1/04)

(2005/C 40/07)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by decision of 23 April 2004 of Frostating lagmannsrett (Frostating Court of Appeal), Trondheim, Norway, which was received at the Court Registry on 27 April 2004, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Fokus Bank ASA v Staten v/Skattedirektoratet, on the following questions:

| 1. | Is it consistent with Article 40 of the EEA Agreement that imputation tax credit for withholding tax is not granted to taxpayers resident in other member states?






  (a) | Is it of legal significance whether the taxpayer is resident in a member state which, in a tax agreement with Norway, has undertaken to grant credit for withholding tax? |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Is it consistent with Article 40 of the EEA Agreement that imputation tax credit for withholding tax is not granted to taxpayers resident in other member states?

(a)

Is it of legal significance whether the taxpayer is resident in a member state which, in a tax agreement with Norway, has undertaken to grant credit for withholding tax?

| (b) | Is it of legal significance whether the taxpayer in the specific case actually is granted, or will be granted, credit for the withholding tax? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Is it of legal significance whether the taxpayer in the specific case actually is granted, or will be granted, credit for the withholding tax?

| 2. | Is it consistent with the EEA Agreement that a member state deals solely with the distributing company when assessing and reassessing dividend tax (withholding tax) in those cases where the assessment decision for the foreign taxpayers is based on the assumption that the owner for tax purposes is someone other than the person who (1) is the owner under private law; (2) is registered in the VPS register as owner; and (3) is stated as owner in relation to the tax authorities, without either the owner for tax purposes or the VPS-registered owner under private law having been made aware of the reclassification? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it consistent with the EEA Agreement that a member state deals solely with the distributing company when assessing and reassessing dividend tax (withholding tax) in those cases where the assessment decision for the foreign taxpayers is based on the assumption that the owner for tax purposes is someone other than the person who (1) is the owner under private law; (2) is registered in the VPS register as owner; and (3) is stated as owner in relation to the tax authorities, without either the owner for tax purposes or the VPS-registered owner under private law having been made aware of the reclassification?

---
EXHIBIT 12.1







                              DISCOVERY ZONE, INC.

               COOMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Dollars in thousands, except ratios)

                                           Seven              Five
                                           Months             Months
                                           Ended              Ended
                                       July 31, 1997    December 31, 1997
                                       -------------    -----------------
Income (loss) before taxes
    on income:                                (5,453)            (27,966)
Adjustments:
    fixed charges                              3,249               6,076
                                          ----------       -------------

Earnings before taxes
    fixed charges as adjusted                 (2,204)            (21,890)
                                          ----------       -------------

Fixed charges:
    Interest incurred                          3,249               6,076
    Portion of rent expense which
     represents interest factor                  --                  --
                                          ----------       -------------
Total fixed charges                            3,249               6,076
                                          ==========       =============
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               --                  --
                                          ==========       =============

                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                          ------------------------------
                                               1998            1996
                                          -------------    -------------
Income (loss) before taxes
    on income:                              (103,932)            (83,834)
Adjustments:
    fixed charges                             16,647               6,277
                                          ----------       -------------
                                         
Earnings before taxes
    fixed charges as adjusted                (87,285)            (77,557)
                                          ----------       -------------

Fixed charges:
    Interest incurred                         16,647               6,277
    Portion of rent expense which
     represents interest factor                  --                  --
                                          ----------       -------------
Total fixed charges                           16,647               6,277
                                          ==========       =============
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               --                  --
                                          ==========       =============
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended on March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
  (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Peter Frugone
 Peter Frugone
 
 Date: May 20, 2009.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2817

To provide that the actuarial value of the prescription drug benefits of 

Members of Congress under the Federal employees health benefits program may not exceed the actuarial value of any prescription drug benefit 

under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2003

Mr. GOODE (for himself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide that the actuarial value of the prescription drug 

benefits of Members of Congress under the Federal employees health benefits program may not exceed the actuarial value of any prescription drug benefit under the 

Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, if legislation providing for prescription drug 
2

•HR 2817 IH 

1 benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act is 

2 passed in the 1st session of the 108th Congress and en3 acted into law, then, effective beginning with the first year 

4 in which such benefits become available pursuant to such 

5 legislation—

6 (1) the actuarial value of the prescription drug 

7 benefit afforded to a current or former Member of 

8 Congress under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 

9 Code, in a year may not, if such current or former 

10 Member is eligible for benefits under title XVIII of 

11 the Social Security Act in such year, exceed 

12 (2) the actuarial value of any prescription drug 

13 benefit which is available under title XVIII of the 

14 Social Security Act in such year by virtue of such 

15 legislation. 

16 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Man17 agement shall promulgate regulations to carry out this 

18 section.

Æ
# C_2023158EN.01000901.xml

| 4.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 24 January 2023

in Case E-1/22

G. Modiano Limited and Standard Wool (UK) Limited v the EFTA Surveillance Authority

State aid – Norwegian Wool Subsidy Scheme – Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority – Rejection of a complaint – Decision taken at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Statement of reasons – No substantial alteration of existing aid)

(2023/C 158/04)

In Case E-1/22, G. Modiano Limited and Standard Wool (UK) Limited v the EFTA Surveillance Authority – APPLICATION seeking the annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision in Case No 84045 of 9 November 2021, the Norwegian Wool Subsidy System, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Bernd Hammermann and Ola Mestad (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 24 January 2023, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action in its entirety;

| 2. | Orders G. Modiano Limited and Standard Wool (UK) Limited to bear their own costs and to pay jointly and severally the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders G. Modiano Limited and Standard Wool (UK) Limited to bear their own costs and to pay jointly and severally the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

---