alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         795,189
<SECURITIES>                                   1,245,863
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,655,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                   305,481
<INVENTORY>                                    6,822,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,506,499
<PP&E>                                         10,436,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,640,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,776,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,830,421
<BONDS>                                        7,051,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,513
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,860,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,776,833
<SALES>                                        6,954,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,954,152
<CGS>                                          4,278,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,559,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               78,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,105,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                   454,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            651,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   651,510
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .22


</TABLE>
#### § 19.241 Scope.

This subpart, which implements section 36(g)(4) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1831m(g)(4)), provides rules and procedures for the removal, suspension, or debarment of independent public accountants and their accounting firms from performing independent audit and attestation services required by section 36 of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1831m) for insured national banks, insured Federal savings associations, and insured Federal branches of foreign banks.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 August 15, 2014 
  

Mr. Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum 
 60 Columbus Circle 

New York, NY 10023 
  

Dear Marc: 
 Pursuant to Section 1 of the Employment
Agreement effective as of February 16, 2012 between you and Time Warner Cable Inc. (the “Agreement”), the Agreement expires on February 15, 2015. This letter offers to amend the Agreement to extend the term through
December 31, 2016. All other provisions of the Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect. For the avoidance of doubt, this extension and the terms of the Agreement shall not change the vesting treatment of the Special
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement – 2015 and Special Restricted Stock Unit Agreement – 2016 for the periods before February 12, 2015 and February 12, 2016, respectively, which shall be governed by the terms of the award agreements.

 Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing extension of the term of your Agreement by executing this letter no later than August 31,
2014 and returning it immediately via interoffice mail to: Meredith Gill, HR-Executive Compensation, Charlotte, NC. 
  

 

					
	Sincerely,		
		
	TIME WARNER CABLE INC.		
			
	By:		/s/ Peter Stern		
			    Peter Stern		
			    Executive Vice President,		
			     Chief Strategy, People and Corporate

    Development Officer



 
  

			
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum
	/s/ Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum
		
	Date:		8.20.14
# EPA REGISTRATION FILE #1706-235 Vol. 2

## 1

## 2

## 3

## 4

## 5

## 6

## 7 *Manufacturing process informatio



### *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

## 8

## 9

## 10 *Manufacturing process information m a 

### *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

## 11

## 12

## 13

## 14

## 15EPA REGISTRATION FILE #1706-235 Vol. 2 Page is not included in this copy. Pages 16 through 19 are not included in this copy. The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients. _____ Identity of product impurities. Description of the product manufacturing process. _____ Description of quality control procedures. Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label.

X The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action. FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request. Internal deliberative information. _____ Attorney-Client work product. Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.

_____Personal Privacy Information The information not included is generally considered confidential by product r egistrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
DLD-163 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-1191

___________

DARREN-JAMES MICHAELS,

Grantor/Beneficiary Complainant, In Personam,

Appellant

v.

LISA ECHEVERRI VICKERS, trustee, In Personam;

JEFF ATWATERS, trustee, In Personam;

LADASIAH JACKSON FORD, In Personam

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 11-cv-00157)

District Judge: Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action 

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

April 19, 2012

Before: AMBRO, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed April 30, 2012)

_________

OPINION

_________
2

PER CURIAM

In August 2011, Darren-James Michaels filed a pro se complaint in the District 

Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. He filed an amended complaint in 

September 2011, alleging breach of trust, trespass, and fraud. He sought declaratory 

relief, specific performance of a trust, a general injunction to restrain, and the return of 

trust res. He emphasized that his is a “suit in equity.” His claims relate to a delinquent 

Florida child support order. The appellees are all Florida residents and employees of the 

Florida government.

The District Court dismissed the complaint on December 15, 2011, for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. It determined that Michaels had failed to allege any facts 

establishing a federal question. His claims implicated state law concepts only. 

Furthermore, the District Court found, it lacked jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship 

grounds. Michaels failed to demonstrate the requisite jurisdictional amount in 

controversy, as his claims were based in equity and he sought no money damages. The 

District Court also noted that Michaels claimed to be a “‘state national’ of the Republic 

of Pennsylvania,” but the record indicated that he is a resident of Florida, as are the 

remaining parties. Michaels filed a motion to vacate or reconsider on January 3, 2012,

and a notice of appeal on January 19, 2012. The District Court denied the motion to 

vacate and reconsider on April 4, 2012. 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm. The District 

Court correctly noted that the complaint does not allege a violation of the Constitution or 
3

federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Additionally, for the reasons stated by the District 

Court, Michaels fails to demonstrate any basis for diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 

1332. Because we conclude that this appeal presents no substantial question, we will 

summarily affirm. See

Michaels has filed numerous motions in this Court while his appeal has been 

pending, including motions to expedite, for special chancellor and special master, for 

sanctions against appellees, and numerous motions to strike appellees’ responses and 

pleadings. All of his motions are denied. Appellees’ motion for the issuance of an order 

to show cause is denied as unnecessary.

3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.
RIC KSNYDE R

GOVERNO R STAT E O F MICHIGA N DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N LANSIN G February13,201 2 r ^ C O r o

••. V e n KIRKT . STEUDL E

; ; OIRECTO R 

# 11 3 O'. ' Mr . Denni s DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dear Mr . DeVany : Subject : Alternat e Essentia l Ai r Servic e Proposal , Docket #DOT-OST-2004-1871 5 Th e Michiga n Departmen t o f Transportation' s Offic e o f Aeronautic s i s th e agenc y taske dwith promotin g ai r

servic e withi n th e Stat e o f Michigan . A s such , w e expres s ou r stron g support

for th e Alternativ e Essentia l Ai r Servic e proposa l o f

th e Manistee-Blacke r

Airport Authorit y (MBAA ) unde r

Docket#DOT-OST-2004-18715 . W e believ e tha t

th e proposal , whil e unconventional , offer s areasonabl e chanc e for th e commimity t o retai n ai r

servic e an dbuil dupo n recen t gain s i n ridership . A s structured , th e proposa l allow s th e communit y servic e b y Publi c Charters , Inc . (i n coordinatio n withCharte r Ai r Transport ) t o Chicag o Midwa y Airport . A significan t

portio n o f

th e Maniste e origi n an ddestinatio n traffi c i s centere di n th e Greate r Chicag o Area. I n addition , th e MBA A plan s t o partne r withPubli c Charter s Inc . t o develo p interlin e agreement s withothe r Chicago-base dairline s t o enhanc e trave l option s for Manistee basedtravelers . Thes e factors , combine dwithstron g community support , provid e a n excellen t opportunity t o buil dupo n th e positiv e tren di n loca l support for ai r service. Than k yo u for th e opportunit y t o expres s ou r support for thi s proposal . I f

yo u hav e an y question s o r

woul dlik e t o discus s th e proposa l fUrther, pleas e feel fi-ee t o contac t m e a t 517-335-956 8 o r

Mr . Mat t Brinke r a t 517-335-9918 . Sincerely ,

Mik e Trout , Executiv e Administrato r Offic e o f Aeronautic s

MURRA YD . VA N WAGONE R BUILDIN G • P.O . BO X 3005 0 • LANSING . MICHIGA N 4890 9 www.mlchigan.go v• (517 ) 373-209 0 LH-LAN- 0 (01/11 )
#### § 263.99 Petition for reinstatement.

The Board may entertain a petition for reinstatement from any person debarred from practice before the Board. The Board shall grant reinstatement only if the Board finds that the petitioner is likely to act in accordance with the regulations in this part, and that granting reinstatement would not be contrary to the public interest. Any request for reinstatement shall be limited to written submissions unless the Board, in its discretion, affords the petitioner an informal hearing.
# C_2021372EN.01000601.xml

| 16.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 372/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10 June 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86932 |
| Decision No | 121/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 amendments to the aid scheme for lost inventory |
| Legal basis | Regulation complementing and executing the Act on a temporary aid scheme for undertakings with substantial loss in turnover after August 2020 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To compensate restaurants, cafes, bars, and hotels that offer food to other customers than hotel guests, and flower retailers, for inventory loss |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | 30 million NOK |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | 10 June 2021 – 31 December 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Food services and flower retailers |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Brønnøysundregistrene |
| Postboks 900 |
| N - 8910 Brønnøysund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

10 June 2021

Case No

86932

Decision No

121/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 amendments to the aid scheme for lost inventory

Legal basis

Regulation complementing and executing the Act on a temporary aid scheme for undertakings with substantial loss in turnover after August 2020

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To compensate restaurants, cafes, bars, and hotels that offer food to other customers than hotel guests, and flower retailers, for inventory loss

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

30 million NOK

Intensity

100 %

Duration

10 June 2021 – 31 December 2021

Economic sectors

Food services and flower retailers

Name and address of the granting authority

Brønnøysundregistrene

Postboks 900

N - 8910 Brønnøysund

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2960

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Brownsville Public Utility Board water recycling and desalinization 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. ORTIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Brownsville Public Utility Board water recycling and desalinization project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BROWNSVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD WATER 

4 RECYCLING AND DESALINIZATION PROJECT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

6 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–

7 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

8 adding at the end the following new section: 
2

•HR 2960 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 163ll. BROWNSVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD 

2 WATER RECYCLING AND DESALINIZATION 

3 PROJECT. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in cooperation 

5 with the Brownsville Public Utility Board, may participate 

6 in the design, planning, and construction of facilities to 

7 reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired waters in the Browns8 ville, Texas, area. 

9 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

10 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

11 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

12 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

13 shall not be used for operation and maintenance of the 

14 project described in subsection (a).’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec16 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

17 inserting after the last item relating title XVI the fol18 lowing:

‘‘Sec. 163l. Brownsville Public Utility Board water recycling and desalinization 

project.’’.

Æ
# C_2021245EN.01001601.xml

| 24.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/16

---

Amendments to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice

(2021/C 245/13)

The Agreement amending Protocol 9 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, signed in Brussels on 18 November 2020, entered into force on 22 December 2020 and is applied from 1 January 2021.

This Agreement and the updated consolidated version of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice have now been published on the EFTA Secretariat’s website.

They can be found through the following links:

https://www.efta.int/Agreement-Annexes-and-Protocols-2477

and

https://www.efta.int/legal-texts/the-surveillance-and-court-agreement/amendments-protocol-9

---
Date: May 24, 2012 

TO: EPA 

SUBJECT: Proposed Carbon Emission Regulations 

Thank you for holding this hearing on the proposed rule for carbon emissions. We need you to protect 

us, as stated in your name. You are a vital part in this process. I am here for myself and others like me 

who need these regulations. I am a 3-time breast cancer survivor. I know very well how important life is 

and our time here. I was first diagnosed in 1994, and most recently in 2007. I have tried to live with as 

many healthy habits as I can. As my parents taught me, I don't smoke, or drink, and have never used 

drugs. I worked for the Social Security Administration until 2 years ago. I have 2 sisters that have never 

had any type of cancer. One major difference between them and me is where we live. I have always 

lived in Cook County, which has air grade of "F" per the American Lung Association. One sister lives in 

Albuquerque, which is grade "B", and the other lives in Pittsburgh, which is grade "0". I am not saying 

that the air pollution caused my cancer, but we still don't know the actual causes, and we can't all move 

to Albuquerque. 

One current fact of Breast cancer is that I am one of 2.6 million breast cancer survivors alive in the U.S. 

today per the National Cancer Institute. We are the largest group of cancer survivors in the country. 

Nearly everyone in this room probably knows someone who is a survivor. That is the good news. 

On the other side, I will always have side effects from my successful treatments. Because my immune 

system has been compromised, I am more sensitive to air and other environmental problems, such as 

air pollution. As medical science continually improves treatment (which I applaud, of course!), even 

more people will survive breast cancer and will need these regulations. 

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to list categories of the sources that "cause or contribute significantly 

to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." As the 

Supreme Court ruled in 2007, the GHGs (green house gases) meet the definition of "air pollutant". And 

this regulation is part of the response. 

In conclusion, I want to continue helping others, as I did in my work for SSA. I hope that these are the 

start of the regulations that we all need to reduce the carbon emissions and numerous other air 

pollutants that are in our atmosphere. I very strongly hope that you will establish future regulations for 

the plants that are currently operating. 

Above notes prepared by: Patricia Walter, Chicago, Illinois
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6902

OMARI H. PATTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CRYSTAL KIMBLE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00010-JPB-MJA)

Submitted: May 11, 2021 Decided: May 13, 2021

Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omari H. Patton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Omari H. Patton appeals the district court’s order, entered upon remand from this 

court, see Patton v. Kimble, 717 F. App’x 271, 272 (4th Cir. 2018) (No. 17-7032), granting 

Federal Corrections Officer Crystal Kimble’s motion for summary judgment in Patton’s 

civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau 

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The sole issue remaining after we ruled in Patton’s 

prior appeal, see Patton, 717 F. App’x at 272, was Patton’s claim that Kimble violated the 

First Amendment by retaliating against Patton for filing administrative grievances. On 

remand, the district court analyzed the issue pursuant to Ziglar v. Abassi, 137 S. Ct. 1843 

(2017), and ruled that the implied-damages remedy recognized in Bivens does not extend 

to First Amendment retaliation claims such as the one Patton advanced. 

We recently addressed this issue in Earle v. Shreves,

* holding that the Bivens

remedy may not “be extended to include a federal inmate’s claim that prison officials 

violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for filing grievances.” 990 

F.3d 774, 776 (4th Cir. 2021). Earle thus confirms the propriety of the district court’s 

dispositive ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary 

judgment to Kimble. Patton v. Kimble, No. 2:16-cv-00010-JPB-MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 

17, 2019). 

* We held this appeal in abeyance pending the disposition in Earle. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3068 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 554
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as the ``Brigadier General 
                (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2055 
Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 
``Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) 
John H. McLain Post Office''.

                                                       Calendar No. 554

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as the ``Brigadier General 
                (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```