alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RHODE I SLAND 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-5767 TDD 401-222-4462 

25 May 2016 

Mr. David B. Conroy 

USEP A, Region 1 

5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Office of Air Resources is hereby submitting the following, revised Air Pollution Control 

Regulations as a revision to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP). Each of these 

regulations is to replace the version previously submitted on 22 September 2008. 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 1 "Visible Emissions" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 3 "Particulate Emissions from Industrial 

Processes" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 4 "Open Fires" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 6 "Continuous Emissions Monitors" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 7 "Emission of Air Contaminants Detrimental 

to Person or Property" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 12 "Incinerators" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 14 "Record Keeping and Reporting" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 15 "Control of Organic Solvent Emissions" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 19 "Control of Volatile Organic Compounds 

from Surface Coating Operations" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 21 "Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Printing Operations" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 26 "Control of Organic Solvent Emissions from 

Manufacturers of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 27 "Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 30 "Control of Volatile Organic Compounds 

from Automobile Refinishing Operations" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 32 "Control of Volatile Organic Compounds 

from Marine Vessel Loading Operations" 

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 35 "Control of Volatile Organic Compounds 

and Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants from Wood Product Manufacturing 

Operations" 

A \.4' 30% post-consumer fiber 
Each of these replacement regulations has certain provisions that have been stricken from the 

regulation and will not be part of the SIP revision. 

The version of each of these Air Pollution Control Regulations previously submitted on 22 

September 2008 should be withdrawn. 

If you should have any questions, feel free to contact me at 401-222-2808, ext 7011. 

Sincerely, 

~~1!11 Office of Air Resources 

Enclosure 

cc: Susan Lancey, EPA w/o enclosures 

Ida McDonnell, EPA w/o enclosures
§ 303.84 Transactions that do not require notice. ( a ) *Exempt transactions.* The following transactions do not require notice to the FDIC under this subpart: ( 1 ) The acquisition of additional voting securities of a covered institution by a person who: ( i ) Held the power to vote 25 percent or more of any class of voting securities of the institution continuously since the later of March 9, 1979, or the date that the institution commenced business; or
( ii ) Is presumed, under § 303.82(b) to have controlled the institution continuously since March 9, 1979, if the aggregate amount of voting securities held does not exceed 25 percent or more of any class of voting securities of the institution or, in other cases, where the FDIC determines that the person has controlled the institution continuously since March 9, 1979;
( 2 ) The acquisition of additional voting securities of a covered institution by a person who has lawfully acquired and maintained control of the institution (for purposes of § 303.82) after obtaining the FDIC's non-objection under the CBCA and the FDIC's regulations or the OTS's non-objection under the repealed Change in Savings and Loan Control Act, 12 U.S.C. 1730(q), and the regulations thereunder then in effect, to acquire control of the institution, unless a notice is required for an increase in ownership described in 12 CFR 303.82(a)(2);
( 3 ) Acquisitions of voting securities subject to approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)), section 18(c) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), or section 10 of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a);
( 4 ) Any transaction described in sections 2(a)(5), 3(a)(A), or 3(a)(B) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)(5), 1842(a)(A), or 1842(a)(B)) by a person described in those provisions;
( 5 ) A customary one-time solicitation of a revocable proxy;
( 6 ) The receipt of voting securities of a covered institution through a pro rata stock dividend or stock split if the proportional interests of the recipients remain substantially the same;
( 7 ) The acquisition of voting securities in a foreign bank that has an insured branch in the United States. (This exemption does not extend to the reports and information required under paragraphs 9, 10, and 12 of the CBCA (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(9), (10), and (12)); and
( 8 ) The acquisition of voting securities of a depository institution holding company for which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System reviews a notice pursuant to the CBCA (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)).
# C_2021303EN.01000901.xml

| 29.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/9

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 303/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16 April 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86711 |
| Decision No | 031/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Whole territory of Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Umbrella scheme for liquidity support for undertakings in municipalities hit by the pandemic |
| Legal basis | Proposition to the Parliament No 79 (pages 37-38 on chapter 553 post 68 the municipal compensation scheme for undertakings)
  Letters of assignment to the municipalities (case 21/1215-2) and (case 21/1215-31)
  Innst. 233 S (2020-2021) (pages 25-26) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensuring access to liquidity, by means of direct grants, for local undertakings facing a sudden shortage or unavailability of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | Estimated NOK 2 000 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | Aid under the scheme will be granted no later than 31 December 2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sector except the finance sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation |
| Postboks 8112 Dep |
| N-0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

16 April 2021

Case No

86711

Decision No

031/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Whole territory of Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Umbrella scheme for liquidity support for undertakings in municipalities hit by the pandemic

Legal basis

Proposition to the Parliament No 79 (pages 37-38 on chapter 553 post 68 the municipal compensation scheme for undertakings)

Letters of assignment to the municipalities (case 21/1215-2) and (case 21/1215-31)

Innst. 233 S (2020-2021) (pages 25-26)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensuring access to liquidity, by means of direct grants, for local undertakings facing a sudden shortage or unavailability of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

Estimated NOK 2 000 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration

Aid under the scheme will be granted no later than 31 December 2021

Economic sectors

All sector except the finance sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation

Postboks 8112 Dep

N-0032 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
City of Pelican, Alaska PO Box 737 Pelican, Alaska 99832 

(907) 735-2202 Fax (907) 735-2258 

RESOLUTION 2014 - 12 

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PELICAN EXPRESSING SUPPORT TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF TRANSPORTATION TO PRESERVE PELICAN'S ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE (EAS) TO JUNEAU, AND 

APPROVE ALASKA SEAPLANES TO CONTINUE EAS SERVICE TO PELICAN FOR ANOTHER FOUR YEARS 

WHEREAS, Juneau, Alaska is Pelican, Alaska's regional air service hub and scheduled air service to 

Juneau represents a vital connection to emergency services, basic necessities, and business and leisure 

travelers, constituting a "community of interest"; and 

WHEREAS, Pelican is guaranteed scheduled air service under the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act, and the 

United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Essential Air Service program; and 

WHEREAS, the purpose of the EAS program is to ensure that communities have air service access where 

there would not otherwise be access; and 

WHEREAS, USDDOT is threatening to eliminate Pelican's air service link to Juneau by recognizing less 

frequent, more expensive and lower capacity service to Sitka as sufficiently constituting "essential air 

service," despite reduced demand for air service between Sitka and Pelican - a decision that will have 

significant adverse effects on our community and economy; and 

WHEREAS, Angoon, Tenakee Springs and Pelican have united to prevent any reduction of air service to 

Juneau, imploring Alaska's Congressional delegation to prevail upon USDOT referencing the 1980 Civil 

Aeronautics Board determination that EAS to Angoon, Tenakee Springs and Pelican must be offered 

from Juneau and Juneau only; and 

WHEREAS, Alaska Seaplanes operates scheduled essential air service between Juneau and Pelican, and 

has provided safe and reliable service to Pelican for 17 years carrying passengers, mail and freight; and 

WHEREAS, Alaska Seaplanes has partnered with the City on a Small Community Air Service grant, a 

major economic development opportunity designed to improve our ability to market our community to 

Juneau, the Lower 48 and beyond. 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 

The City of Pelican calls on the United States Department of Transportation to reaffirm Essential Air 

Service to Pelican with access to our longstanding Juneau air service hub, and to expeditiously approve 

the proposal of Alaska Seaplanes to continue serving Pelican for no less than another four year term. 

PAssED, APPRovED AND ADOPTED THis Jth DAY oF N ()\fern b~zo14. 

Signed: ?~T/.+.2 Patricia Phillips, Mayor 

~ffi~ Kel y L Chap an, City Clerk 

;·, . .,,.,. !• 

H·O·'i
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ SATCO PRODUCTS, INC. , Appellant

v.

LIGHTING SCIENCE GRO UP CORPORATION, Appellee

______________________

2019

- 1638

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

- 01638.

______________________
Decided: April 8, 2020

______________________
R OBERT S TEPHAN R IGG , Vedder Price PC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by J OHN K. B URKE , S UDIP M ITRA , D ANIEL S HULMAN

.

K

AYVAN B. N OROOZI , Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee.

______________________
Before D YK , C HEN , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges. Case: 19-1638 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 04/08/2020SATCO PRO DS

. , INC

. v. LIGHTING SCI

. GRP

. CORP

. 2

S TOLL , Circuit Judge

. Satco Prod ucts
, Inc. appeals the determination of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that claims 1, 2, 6, 11, 14

, 15, and 19

– 23 of U.S. Patent No. 8,201,968 a re not an t i cipated or, in combination with other prior art references, rendered obvious by U.S. Patent No. 7,670,021. The issues in this case are identical to the issues presented to us in Tech nical Consumer Prod uct s Inc. v. Lighting Sci ence Gr ou p Corp.

, No. 19

- 1361 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2020) , issued herewith . For the reasons stated in that opinion, and because claims 2 and 6 of the ’968 patent are the only remaining challenged claims in this case

, 1 we vacat e the Board’s decision of no anticipation or obvio usness of claims 2 and 6 and remand for consideration of the parties’ remaining arguments pertaining to those claims

. VACATED AND REMANDED

C OSTS Costs to Appellant.

1 Claims 1, 11, 14, 15, and 19

– 23 of the ’968 patent were determined to be unpatentable in Technical Consumer Products, Inc. v. Lighting Science Group Corporation

, No. IPR201 7

- 0 1287
, 2018 WL 5733733 (P.T.A.B. Oct

. 31 , 201 8 ) , and Lighting Science Group Corp. did not appeal this determination. Case: 19-1638 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 04/08/2020
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40727 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(7:05-CR-614-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________ Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mario Cortez appeals the 70-month term of imprisonment imposed after his guilty plea to taking a vehicle by force, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119. Cortez claims the district court reversibly erred by imposing a Guidelines sentence without considering his troubled and violent youth in the light of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).-2-

After United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), sentences
are reviewed only for unreasonableness; nevertheless, a district court has a duty to consider the § 3553(a) fac tors as well as a duty to correctly determine the applicable Guidelines range. E .g., United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 518-19, cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). If, in the exercise of discretion, the district court imposes a sentence within a properly calculated Guidelines
range, little explanation is required, and this court will infer that the district court considered all of the factors for a fair sentence set for in the Guidelines. Id. at 519. Given the de ference due the district court’s discretion under the Booker regime, “it will be rare for a reviewing court to say such a sentence is ‘unreasonable’”. Id. The record reflects that the district court considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors. Cortez has not shown that the sentence was unreasonable or that this court should not defer to the district court’s determinations at sentencing. Id. AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Mariano DomingoName:
    Mariano DomingoTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY
2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                553,825
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         431,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                           23,726
<INVENTORY>                                           276,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,333,584
<PP&E>                                                344,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                        124,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,565,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 587,629
<BONDS>                                               599,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               12,288
<OTHER-SE>                                            932,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,565,774
<SALES>                                             1,659,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,659,981
<CGS>                                                 889,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         889,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      137,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        4,169
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     45,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       193,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                           74,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   103,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           519
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          104,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.79
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources
Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on September
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter
Frugone


Peter
Frugone


Date: November
17, 2010.
# Úradný vestník C 360I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 360I |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 648. septembra 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 360I

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 648. septembra 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Rada |
| 2021/C 360 I/01 | Rozhodnutie Rady zo 6. septembra 2021, ktorým sa prijíma pozícia Rady k návrhu všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Rada

2021/C 360 I/01

Rozhodnutie Rady zo 6. septembra 2021, ktorým sa prijíma pozícia Rady k návrhu všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Rada

| 8.9.2021 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CI 360/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CI 360/1

---

ROZHODNUTIE RADY

zo 6. septembra 2021,

ktorým sa prijíma pozícia Rady k návrhu všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022

(2021/C 360 I/01)

RADA EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie, a najmä jej článok 314 ods. 3, v spojení so Zmluvou o založení Európskeho spoločenstva pre atómovú energiu, a najmä jej článkom 106a,

keďže:

| (1) | Komisia 9. júla 2021 predložila návrh všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Komisia 9. júla 2021 predložila návrh všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022 (1).

| (2) | Rada preskúmala návrh Komisie s cieľom vymedziť pozíciu, ktorá je na strane príjmov v súlade s rozhodnutím Rady (EÚ, Euratom) 2020/2053 zo 14. decembra 2020 o systéme vlastných zdrojov Európskej únie a o zrušení rozhodnutia 2014/335/EÚ, Euratom (2) a na strane výdavkov v súlade s nariadením Rady (EÚ, Euratom) 2020/2093 zo 17. decembra 2020, ktorým sa stanovuje viacročný finančný rámec na roky 2021 až 2027 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Rada preskúmala návrh Komisie s cieľom vymedziť pozíciu, ktorá je na strane príjmov v súlade s rozhodnutím Rady (EÚ, Euratom) 2020/2053 zo 14. decembra 2020 o systéme vlastných zdrojov Európskej únie a o zrušení rozhodnutia 2014/335/EÚ, Euratom (2) a na strane výdavkov v súlade s nariadením Rady (EÚ, Euratom) 2020/2093 zo 17. decembra 2020, ktorým sa stanovuje viacročný finančný rámec na roky 2021 až 2027 (3).

ROZHODLA TAKTO:

Jediný článok

Rada prijala 6. septembra 2021 pozíciu Rady k návrhu všeobecného rozpočtu Európskej únie na rozpočtový rok 2022.

Úplné znenie je k dispozícii na nahliadnutie alebo stiahnutie na webovom sídle Rady: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

V Bruseli, 6. septembra 2021.

Za Radu

predseda

G. DOVŽAN

---

(1)  COM(2021) 300 final.

1

(2)  Ú. v. EÚ L 424, 15.12.2020, s. 1.

2

(3)  Ú. v. EÚ L 433 I, 22.12.2020, s. 11.

3

---