alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                          RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with the annual report of Riviera Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William L. Westerman,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement,  or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic  version of this written  statement,  has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  March 2, 2007
                                              /s/ William L. Westerman
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
§ 265.13 Functions delegated to the Director of the Division of Financial Stability. The Director of the Division of Financial Stability (or the Director's delegatee) is authorized: ( a ) *Bank holding companies; savings and loan holding companies; financial holding companies; change in bank control; mergers* — ( 1 ) *Stress tests.* ( i ) Jointly with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, with the concurrence of the Chair of the Committee on Supervision and Regulation: ( A ) To develop and issue scenarios, including, but not limited to, the baseline scenario and the severely adverse scenario, that the Board would use to conduct analyses under § 238.132 of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.132) or § 252.44 of Regulation YY (12 CFR 252.44) and that a company would use to conduct its stress tests under § 238.143 of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.143) or § 252.14 or § 252.54 of Regulation YY (12 CFR 252.14 or 252.54), as appropriate, provided that no significant policy issues are raised; and
( B ) To develop and issue additional scenarios or additional components for use in the severely adverse scenario under § 238.132(b) and 238.143(b)(2) and (3) of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.132(b) and 238.143(b)(2) and (3)), and §§ 252.14(b)(2) and (3), 252.44(b), and 252.54(b)(2) and (3) of Regulation YY (12 CFR 252.14(b)(2) and (3), 252.44(b), and 252.54(b)(2) and (3)), that the Board would use to conduct analyses under § 238.132 of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.132) or § 252.44 of Regulation YY (12 CFR 225.44) and that a company would use to conduct its stress tests under § 238.143 of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.143) or § 252.14 or § 252.54 of Regulation YY (12 CFR 252.14 or 252.54), as appropriate, provided that no significant policy issues are raised;
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Capital plans.* ( 1 ) Jointly with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, with the concurrence of the Vice Chair for Supervision: ( i ) To provide a firm subject to the Board's capital plan rules with notice of its stress capital buffer requirement and an explanation of the results of the supervisory stress test pursuant to §§ 225.8(h)(1) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.8(h)(1)) and 238.170(h)(1) of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.170(h)(1)); and
( ii ) To provide a firm subject to the Board's capital plan rules with its final stress capital buffer requirement and confirmation of its final planned capital distributions pursuant to §§ 225.8(h)(4)(i) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.8(h)(4)(i)) and 238.170(h)(4)(i) of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.170(h)(4)(i)).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[87 FR 54003, Sept. 1, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 32622, May 22, 2023]
§ 161.55 With recourse. ( a ) The term *with recourse* means, in connection with the sale of a loan or a participation interest in a loan, an agreement or arrangement under which the purchaser is to be entitled to receive from the seller a sum of money or thing of value, whether tangible or intangible (including any substitution), upon default in payment of any loan involved or any part thereof or to withhold or to have withheld from the seller a sum of money or anything of value by way of security against default. The recourse liability resulting from a sale with recourse shall be the total book value of any loan sold with recourse less: ( 1 ) The amount of any insurance or guarantee against loss in the event of default provided by a third party,
( 2 ) The amount of any loss to be borne by the purchaser in the event of default, and
( 3 ) The amount of any loss resulting from a recourse obligation entered on the books and records of the savings association.
( b ) The term *with recourse* does not include loans or interests therein where the agreement of sale provides for the savings association directly or indirectly: ( 1 ) To hold or retain a subordinate interest in a specified percentage of the loans or interests; or
( 2 ) To guarantee against loss up to a specified percentage of the loans or interests, which specified percentage shall not exceed ten percent of the outstanding balance of the loans or interests at the time of sale: *Provided,* That the savings association designates adequate reserves for the subordinate interest or guarantee.
( c ) This definition does not apply for purposes of determining the capital adequacy requirements under 12 CFR part 3.
[76 FR 49043, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 11313, Feb. 28, 2014; 84 FR 56376, Oct. 22, 2019]
# C_2005103EN.01002801.xml

| 28.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/28

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 5 May 2004

in Case E-4/03: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway

v

(Failure of a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC)

(Failure of a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC)

(2005/C 103/14)

In Case E-4/03, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway — Application for a declaration that, by adopting Regulation No 853 of 28 August 1998 regarding type approval of gaming machines (forskrift av 28. august 1998 nr. 853 om typegodkjenning av gevinstautomater) without previously notifying the EFTA Surveillance Authority at the drafting stage, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations, as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Tresselt and Thorgeir Örlygsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment of 5 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

v

forskrift av 28. august 1998 nr. 853 om typegodkjenning av gevinstautomater

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting Regulation No 853 of 28 August 1998 regarding type approval of gaming machines, without previously notifying the EFTA Surveillance Authority at the drafting stage, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998, adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and referred to in point 1 of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting Regulation No 853 of 28 August 1998 regarding type approval of gaming machines, without previously notifying the EFTA Surveillance Authority at the drafting stage, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998, adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and referred to in point 1 of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Norway to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Norway to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT ESTELA M AR IA HER

NANDEZ DE M ONTES, Pe t i tione r,
v. JEFFER SON B . SESSIONS III, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 09-72065 Age n c y No. A075-304-149 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for R e vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls A rgue d July

12, 2017; Re subm itte d

August 22, 2017 Sa n Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : GR

AB E R and FR IEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s, a nd M AR SHALL, * * Distric t Judge
. Pe titione r Este l a

M aria He rnande z De M onte s pe titions for re vie w of a n orde r by the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls de ny ing Pe titione r’ s third m otion to
re ope n to re a pply for a sy lum , for withholding of rem ova l a nd re lie f unde r the 

# FIL ED AUG 24 2017 M O LLYC. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a

ppropria te for public a tion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * T he Honora

b le C onsue lo B . M arsha ll, Se nior Unite d Sta t e s Distric t Judge for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a l ifornia , sitting by de signa tion.C onve ntion Aga inst Torture , a nd to re a pply for c anc e l la tion of re m ova l (the

“ M otion” ). The M otion sought re lie f ba s e d on Pe titione r’ s husba nd’ s the n-e xisting
m e dic a l c ondition—

“ e nd sta ge re na l fa ilure awa iting a va ila bility of a n orga n transpla n ta tion,” whic h “ re quire s he m odia ly sis thre e (3) tim e s pe r we e k.” Pe titione r’ s husba

nd ha s sinc e re c e i ve d a

kidne y tra nspla nt. Ac c ordingly , we dism iss the a ppe a l a s m oot. Se e Pila

te v. B urre l l (In re B urre l l), 415 F.3d 994, 998 (9th C ir. 2005) (“ A c a se is m oot if the issue s pre se nte d
are n o longe r live and the re fa ils to be a ‘ c a s e or c ontrove rsy ’ unde r Artic le III of the C onstitution.” ); Pub. Utils. C om m ’ n v. FER C , 100 F.3d 1451, 1458 (9th C ir. 1996) (“ The c ourt m

ust be a ble to gra nt e ffe c tive re lie f, or it la c ks jurisdic tion a nd
m ust dismiss the a

ppe a l.” ). DISM I SSE D.

2
#### § 150.360 May I make a loan to a fiduciary account that is secured by an interest in the assets of the account?

You may make a loan to a fiduciary account that is secured by an interest in the assets of the account, if the transaction is fair to the account and is not prohibited by applicable law.
January 24, 2011

David Rise, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Helena Regulatory Office

Region 8

10 West 15th Street

Helena, Montana 59626

RE: 401 Certification for (EPA) NPDES Pesticide General Permit

Dear Mr. Rise,

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes’ Natural Resources Department (NRD) received a 

401 Certification request from your office regarding the Environmental Protection Agencies 

NPDES Pesticides General Permit. The Tribal NRD has reviewed the proposed project to 

determine its compliance with Tribal water quality standards and other Tribal ordinances.

Pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR Part 122.55, the Tribal NRD grants 

401 Certification approvals with the following conditions found in the Integrated Noxious Weed 

Management Plan and Amendments, (Plan, CSKT 1993 b), the 2000 Forest Management Plan, 

and recent NEPA documents for conducting herbicide applications.

1. Pesticides would be used to the water’s edge only when the product’s label allows such 

use.

2. When runoff potential is high, applicator would stay at least 10 feet from the edge of a 

natural break (ridge top) that leads into wetland or riparian areas.

3. Applications within 50 feet of sensitive surface water would occur when wind speed is 

>10 mph.

4. Drift reducing additives would be used when working within 50 feet of open-water and 

wetland/riparian areas.

5. Pesticide mixing and loading would take place at least 500 feet from sensitive surface and 

ground-water areas unless spill containment devices (absorbent mat) are used and an anti 

back-siphoning devise is used when drafting water.

6. Work would conform to the CSKT Best Management Practices (CSKT 2000, from the 

Forest Management Plan.

7. Only pesticides labeled for aquatic use would be applied near water bodies.

8. Tordon would not be applied in riparian zones.

9. All spray equipment would be calibrated in advance to help avoid contamination of 

surface and ground water sources.
2

The conditions listed above must be included in the contract specific provisions or by standard 

design practice. The applicant must submit to the Tribal NRD a copy of the completed contract 

30 days prior to the construction start date.

If you have any questions regarding the 401 Certification, please contact me (675-2700 ext.7263) 

or Michael Durglo, Environmental Protection Division Manager at (675-2700 ext. 7227). Thank 

You.

Sincerely, 

 

Rich Janssen, 

Natural Resources Department Head 

Cc: Paula Webster, Water Quality Program

Dan Lipscomb, Shoreline Office Administrator

John Harrison, Tribal Attorney

 Willie Keenan, Pesticide Program
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Foreign Malicious Cyber Activity Against U.S. Critical Infrastructure

# 									Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Foreign Malicious Cyber Activity Against U.S. Critical Infrastructure							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 15, 2021

The U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice (RFJ) program, which is administered by the Diplomatic Security Service, is offering a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to the identification or location of any person who, while acting at the direction or under the control of a foreign government, participates in malicious cyber activities against U.S. critical infrastructure in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

Certain malicious cyber operations targeting U.S. critical infrastructure may violate the CFAA. Violations of the statute may include transmitting extortion threats as part of ransomware attacks; intentional unauthorized access to a computer or exceeding authorized access and thereby obtaining information from any protected computer; and knowingly causing the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causing damage without authorization to a protected computer. Protected computers include not only U.S. government and financial institution computer systems, but also those used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or communication.

Commensurate with the seriousness with which we view these cyber threats, the Rewards for Justice program has set up a Dark Web (Tor-based) tips-reporting channel to protect the safety and security of potential sources. The RFJ program also is working with interagency partners to enable the rapid processing of information as well as the possible relocation of and payment of rewards to sources. Reward payments may include payments in cryptocurrency.

More information about this reward offer is located on the Rewards for Justice website at www.rewardsforjustice.net. We encourage anyone with information on malicious cyber activity, carried out against U.S. critical infrastructure in violation of the CFAA by actors at the direction of or under the control of a foreign government, to contact the Rewards for Justice office via our Tor-based tips-reporting channel at: he5dybnt7sr6cm32xt77pazmtm65flqy6irivtflruqfc5ep7eiodiad.onion (Tor browser required).

Since its inception in 1984, the program has paid in excess of $200 million to more than 100 people across the globe who provided actionable information that helped prevent terrorism, bring terrorist leaders to justice, and resolve threats to U.S. national security. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/RFJ_USA.

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic SecurityCyber IssuesCyber SecurityDiplomatic SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for Justice

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.1--3/31/01 10-Q




Exhibit 10.1










INTEREST
PAYMENT OPTION


This Interest Payment
Option (“Option”) dated this 21st day of March, 2001, is offered by
eBANKER USA.COM, INC., a Colorado corporation (“eBanker”) having an
address of 1700 Lincoln Street, 31st Floor, Denver, Colorado 80203 to GLOBAL MED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Colorado corporation (“Global” or
“Borrower”) having an address of 12600 West Colfax Avenue, Suite A500,
Lakewood, Colorado 80215 (collectively the “Parties”). 


WHEREAS, the Parties
entered into a Loan Restructuring and Restatement Agreement
(“Agreement”) dated November 19, 2000, and; 


WHEREAS,  pursuant
to  the  Agreement,  Global  agreed  to  pay  interest  of 12%  per  annum  on a
semi-annual basis, with the first interest payment due May 19, 2001;


eBanker wishes to offer
an option to Global regarding  Global's interest payments to eBanker pursuant to
the agreement as follows:


	 	
eBanker
agrees that Global may have the option, with five days prior written notice, to
elect and pay to eBanker, before July 1, 2001, Global’s entire interest
payment calculated for the life of Agreement, in the form of 1,746,688 shares of
Global common stock (calculated at $0.6875 per share, which is prevailing market
price of March 22, 2001).




	 	
In
the event that Global pays down any principal on the loan prior to July 1, 2003,
eBanker will return a number of shares determined by calculating the pro-rata
interest avoided due to early repayment of principal divided by $0.6875 per
share. eBanker will make this calculation on July 1, 2001, July 1, 2002 and July
1, 2003.





Agreed to as of the date
first above written:


GLOBAL MED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.          
             
       
             
       
eBANKER USA.COM, INC.



/s/  Michael I. Ruxin
          
             
                 
             
             
              
    
/s/  Robert H. Trapp

Dr. Michael I. Ruxin
          
             
                 
             
             
              
    Robert H. Trapp

Chairman          
             
                    
             
             
             
             
       Director
#### §§ 3.46-3.50 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Chairman's Perspective, (5) FY09 RAC Proposal Voting, (6) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 15, 2009 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Pine Room, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Randy Jero, Committee Coordinator, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Randy Jero, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-1269; E-mail                         *rjero@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will                           ( print page 51832)                        be provided and individuals who made written requests by October 13, 2009 will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.                

Dated: October 2, 2009.

Eduardo Olmedo,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. E9-24286 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 221.108 Effect of registration of stock subsequent to making of loan. ( a ) The Board recently was asked whether a loan by a bank to enable the borrower to purchase a newly issued nonmargin stock during the initial over-the-counter trading period prior to the stock becoming registered (listed) on a national securities exchange would be subject to this part. The Board replied that, until such stock qualifies as margin stock, this would not be applicable to such a loan.
( b ) The Board has now been asked what the position of the lending bank would be under this part if, after the date on which the stock should become registered, such bank continued to hold a loan of the kind just described. It is assumed that the loan was in an amount greater than the maximum loan value for the collateral specified in this part.
( c ) If the stock should become registered, the loan would then be for the purpose of purchasing or carrying a margin stock, and, if secured directly or indirectly by any margin stock, would be subject to this part as from the date the stock was registered. Under this part, this does not mean that the bank would have to obtain reduction of the loan in order to reduce it to an amount no more than the specified maximum loan value. It does mean, however, that so long as the loan balance exceeded the specified maximum loan value, the bank could not permit any withdrawals or substitutions of collateral that would increase such excess; nor could the bank increase the amount of the loan balance unless there was provided additional collateral having a maximum loan value at least equal to the amount of the increase. In other words, as from the date the stock should become a margin stock, the loan would be subject to this part in exactly the same way, for example, as a loan subject to this part that became under-margined because of a decline in the current market value of the loan collateral or because of a decrease by the Board in the maximum loan value of the loan collateral.