alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020090EN.01000301.xml

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 13 December 2019

in Case E-1/18

EFTA Surveillance Authority

v

The Kingdom of Norway

(Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

(2020/C 90/03)

In Case E-1/18, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that, by maintaining in force provisions such as Section 14-13 first, second and third paragraphs and Section 14-14 first paragraph of the National Insurance Act, which render the father’s entitlement to parental benefits dependent on the mother’s situation whereas the mother’s entitlement is not dependent on the father’s situation, Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1)(c) of the Act referred to at point 21b of Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)), the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), and Siri Teigum (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 13 December 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 79 FR 5804, Jan. 31, 2014.

§ 248.16 Ownership of interests in and sponsorship of issuers of certain collateralized debt obligations backed by trust-preferred securities. ( a ) The prohibition contained in § 248.10(a)(1) does not apply to the ownership by a banking entity of an interest in, or sponsorship of, any issuer if: ( 1 ) The issuer was established, and the interest was issued, before May 19, 2010;
( 2 ) The banking entity reasonably believes that the offering proceeds received by the issuer were invested primarily in Qualifying TruPS Collateral; and
( 3 ) The banking entity acquired such interest on or before December 10, 2013 (or acquired such interest in connection with a merger with or acquisition of a banking entity that acquired the interest on or before December 10, 2013).
( b ) For purposes of this § 248.16, *Qualifying TruPS Collateral* shall mean any trust preferred security or subordinated debt instrument issued prior to May 19, 2010 by a depository institution holding company that, as of the end of any reporting period within 12 months immediately preceding the issuance of such trust preferred security or subordinated debt instrument, had total consolidated assets of less than $15,000,000,000 or issued prior to May 19, 2010 by a mutual holding company.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a banking entity may act as a market maker with respect to the interests of an issuer described in paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 248.4 and 248.11.
( d ) Without limiting the applicability of paragraph (a) of this section, the Board, the FDIC and the OCC will make public a non-exclusive list of issuers that meet the requirements of paragraph (a). A banking entity may rely on the list published by the Board, the FDIC and the OCC.
[79 FR 5227, 5228, Jan. 31, 2014]
§ 263.29 Summary disposition. ( a ) *In general.* The ALJ will recommend that the Board issue a final order granting a motion for summary disposition if the undisputed pleaded facts, admissions, affidavits, stipulations, documentary evidence, matters as to which official notice may be taken, and any other evidentiary materials properly submitted in connection with a motion for summary disposition show: ( 1 ) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact; and
( 2 ) The moving party is entitled to a decision in its favor as a matter of law.
( b ) *Filing of motions and responses.* ( 1 ) Any party who believes there is no genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that the party is entitled to a decision as a matter of law may move at any time for summary disposition in its favor of all or any part of the proceeding. Any party, within 20 days after service of such a motion, or within such time period as allowed by the ALJ, may file a response to such motion.
( 2 ) A motion for summary disposition must be accompanied by a statement of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue. Such motion must be supported by documentary evidence, which may take the form of admissions in pleadings, stipulations, depositions, investigatory depositions, transcripts, affidavits, and any other evidentiary materials that the moving party contends supports the moving party's position. The motion must also be accompanied by a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention of the moving party. Any party opposing a motion for summary disposition must file a statement setting forth those material facts as to which the opposing party contends a genuine dispute exists. Such opposition must be supported by evidence of the same type as that submitted with the motion for summary disposition and a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention that summary disposition would be inappropriate.
( c ) *Hearing on motion.* At the written request of any party or on the ALJ's own motion, the ALJ may hear oral argument on the motion for summary disposition.
( d ) *Decision on motion.* Following receipt of a motion for summary disposition and all responses thereto, the ALJ will determine whether the moving party is entitled to summary disposition. If the ALJ determines that summary disposition is warranted, the ALJ will submit a recommended decision to that effect to the Board. If the ALJ finds that no party is entitled to summary disposition, the ALJ will make a ruling denying the motion.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.21


                           [LETTERHEAD]



November 5, 1998




Mr. Steve Ardia
3 W. Lake Street
Skaneateles, NY 13152

Dear Steve:

This letter is to confirm that you will be assuming the position of Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors of The Langer Biomechanics Group, Inc. on
December 1, 1998. Your remuneration will be $20,000 per year and you will
receive an option to purchase 75,000 shares at current market prices with a
vesting schedule to be established, which will be based upon a combination of
performance and time.

The Langer Board of Directors, as well as myself, wish you the best of luck as
we begin what I am sure will become a successful and rewarding journey.

Good luck.

/s/ Ken Granat
Ken Granat

KG:em
427 A.2d 252

#### Commonwealth v. White, Appellant.

*634Submitted March 21, 1980.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before HESTER, WICKERSHAM and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
# C_2019197EN.01003601.xml

| 13.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/36

---

Action brought on 26 February 2019 by Nettbuss AS against Konkurrenten.no AS

(Case E-1/17 Costs)

(2019/C 197/08)

An action against Konkurrenten.no AS was brought before the EFTA Court on 26 February 2019 by Nettbuss AS, represented by Camilla Borna Fossem of Advokatfirmaet Schjødt AS, Ruseløkkveien 14, NO-0201 Oslo, Norway.

The applicant asks that the Court make the following order:

| 1. | Konkurrenten.no will pay to Nettbuss AS the amount of NOK 442 125 (or equivalent in euro) in addition to the relevant default interest rates. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Konkurrenten.no will pay to Nettbuss AS the amount of NOK 442 125 (or equivalent in euro) in addition to the relevant default interest rates.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | Konkurrenten.no AS brought an action against Decision No 179/15/COL of May 2015, by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, before the EFTA Court on 11 January 2017. The applicant was directly affected by ESA’s decision and applied for leave to intervene in the Case, E-1/17 Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority. The applicant was granted leave to intervene by Order of the President on 12 July 2017. |
| --- | --- |

—

Konkurrenten.no AS brought an action against Decision No 179/15/COL of May 2015, by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, before the EFTA Court on 11 January 2017. The applicant was directly affected by ESA’s decision and applied for leave to intervene in the Case, E-1/17 Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority. The applicant was granted leave to intervene by Order of the President on 12 July 2017.

| — | Article 70(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the EFTA Court states.

  ‘If there is a dispute concerning the costs to be recovered, the Court shall, on application by the party concerned and after hearing the opposite party, make an order.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 70(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the EFTA Court states.

‘If there is a dispute concerning the costs to be recovered, the Court shall, on application by the party concerned and after hearing the opposite party, make an order.’

| — | In the Order of the Court in Case E-1/17, the EFTA Court ordered Konkurrenten.no AS to bear the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the Order of the Court in Case E-1/17, the EFTA Court ordered Konkurrenten.no AS to bear the costs incurred by the applicant.

---
# C_2022202EN.01001801.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/18

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/14)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28 January 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88045 |
| Decision No | 026/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Renewal of and amendment to the aid scheme for lost inventory |
| Legal basis | Regulation complementing and executing the Act on a temporary aid scheme for undertakings with substantial loss in turnover after August 2020 for grant periods after October 2021 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To compensate restaurants, cafes, bars, and hotels that offer food to other customers than hotel guests, and flower retailers, for inventory loss |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 28 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | December 2021 to February 2022 |
| Economic sectors | Food services and flower retailers |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Brønnøysundregistrene |
| P.O. Box 900 |
| N-8910 Brønnøysund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

28 January 2022

Case No

88045

Decision No

026/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Renewal of and amendment to the aid scheme for lost inventory

Legal basis

Regulation complementing and executing the Act on a temporary aid scheme for undertakings with substantial loss in turnover after August 2020 for grant periods after October 2021

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To compensate restaurants, cafes, bars, and hotels that offer food to other customers than hotel guests, and flower retailers, for inventory loss

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 28 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration

December 2021 to February 2022

Economic sectors

Food services and flower retailers

Name and address of the granting authority

Brønnøysundregistrene

P.O. Box 900

N-8910 Brønnøysund

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2009058EN.01001201.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/12

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2009/C 58/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 3 December 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number: | 64556 |
| EFTA State: | Norway |
| Region: | — |
| Title: | Wood-based Innovation Scheme |
| Legal basis: | Annual State Budget (St.prp. Nr. 1, Chapter 1149, item 71), annual letter of allocation from The Royal Ministry of Agriculture and Food to Innovation Norway, and a Strategy document adopted by The Ministry of Agriculture and Food |
| Type of measure: | Aid scheme |
| Objective: | To increase the use of wood and profitability in the wood sector |
| Form of aid: | Direct grants |
| Budget: | NOK 14 million (approximately EUR 1,75 million), Annual budget subject to parliamentary budget procedures |
| Intensity: | According to guidelines |
| Duration: | 2008-2013 |
| Economic sectors: | Forest and wood-sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority: | Ministry of Agriculture and Food |
| PO Box 8007 |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision:

Date of adoption of the decision:

3 December 2008

Case number:

Case number:

64556

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Norway

Region:

Region:

—

Title:

Title:

Wood-based Innovation Scheme

Legal basis:

Legal basis:

Annual State Budget (St.prp. Nr. 1, Chapter 1149, item 71), annual letter of allocation from The Royal Ministry of Agriculture and Food to Innovation Norway, and a Strategy document adopted by The Ministry of Agriculture and Food

Type of measure:

Type of measure:

Aid scheme

Objective:

Objective:

To increase the use of wood and profitability in the wood sector

Form of aid:

Form of aid:

Direct grants

Budget:

Budget:

NOK 14 million (approximately EUR 1,75 million), Annual budget subject to parliamentary budget procedures

Intensity:

Intensity:

According to guidelines

Duration:

Duration:

2008-2013

Economic sectors:

Economic sectors:

Forest and wood-sector

Name and address of the granting authority:

Name and address of the granting authority:

Ministry of Agriculture and Food

PO Box 8007

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information:

Other information:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority's website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
#### § 1081.300 Public hearings.

All hearings in adjudication proceedings will be public unless a confidentiality order is entered by the hearing officer pursuant to § 1081.119 or unless otherwise ordered by the Director on the grounds that holding an open hearing would be contrary to the public interest.
§ 242.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Board pursuant to sections 102(a)(7) and (b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) (12 U.S.C. 5311(a)(7) and (b)).
( b ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) This part establishes the criteria for determining if a company is “predominantly engaged in financial activities” as required under section 102(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5311(b)) for purposes of Title I of the Dodd-Frank Act.
( 2 ) This part defines the terms “significant nonbank financial company” and “significant bank holding company” as provided in section 102(a)(6) of the Dodd-Frank Act for purposes of— ( i ) Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5323) relating to the designation of nonbank financial companies by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) for supervision by the Board; and
( ii ) Section 165(d)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(d)(2)) relating to the credit exposure reports required to be filed by— ( A ) A nonbank financial company supervised by the Board; and
( B ) A bank holding company or foreign bank subject to the Bank Holding Company Act (BHC Act) (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*) that is a bank holding company described in section 165(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(a)).
[78 FR 20776, Apr. 5, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 59096, Nov. 1, 2019]
Order entered April 17, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00458-CR

LONZELL HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1676537-P

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s April 15, 2019 “Motion to Amend Appellant’s 

December 12, 2018 Brief” and “Third Motion to Supplement Reporter’s Record.” In his motions, 

appellant requests that this Court accept his amended brief tendered on April 15, 2019, as timely 

filed and “order the court reporter to supplement the reporter’s record with the transcript of the 

pre-trial hearing in which Judge Teresa Hawthorne, presiding judge of the 203rd Judicial District 

Court, ruled on most of Appellant’s pre-trial motions,” which hearing “likely took place on 

January 29, 2018 or January 31, 2018.”

We GRANT appellant’s motions and order the following relief. 

We ORDER the amended brief tendered by appellant on April 15, 2019, timely filed as 

of the date of this order. 
We ORDER the court reporter to file, WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OF THE DATE 

OF THIS ORDER, a supplemental reporter’s record of the pre-trial hearing on approximately 

January 29, 2018, or January 31, 2018, in which Judge Teresa Hawthorne ruled on pre-trial 

motions of appellant. 

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Lisabeth Kellett, 

official court reporter, 203rd Judicial District Court; to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District 

Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2012384EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/11 |

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2012/C 384/09

PART I

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | GBER 11/12/EMP | |
| EFTA State | Norway | |
| Region | Name of the region (NUTS) Level 3 — Troms | Regional aid status 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Granting authority | Name | Troms fylkeskommune |
| Address | | | | --- | | Postbox 6600 | | 9296 Tromsø | | NORWAY | |
| Webpage | http://www.tromsfylke.no |
| Title of the aid measure | Regional development programme for the county of Troms 2010-2013 | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | The Troms County Development Fund was established by a decision of 12 March 1985 by the Troms County Council | |
| Web link to the full text of the aid measure | http://www.tromsfylke.no/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=qah\_PB73Oyc%3d&tabid=332 | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | X |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | | EFTA Surveillance Authority aid number Reference number ESA 2/2005 |
| Prolongation | 2010-2013 |
| Duration | Scheme | 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid | X |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | X |
| Budget | Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | NOK 8 million |
| Aid instrument (Article 5) | Grant | X |
| Interest rate subsidy | |
| Loan | X |

PART II

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| SME investment and employment aid (Article 15) | | 50 % | 0 % |

---
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, David English, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Thomas Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 30, 2006 /s/
  DAVID ENGLISHDavid
  EnglishChief
  Financial Officer, Vice President,Treasurer,
  and Assistant Secretary