alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 220
Editorial Note: A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

§ 220.5 Special memorandum account. ( a ) A special memorandum account (SMA) may be maintained in conjunction with a margin account. A single entry amount may be used to represent both a credit to the SMA and a debit to the margin account. A transfer between the two accounts may be effected by an increase or reduction in the entry. When computing the equity in a margin account, the single entry amount shall be considered as a debit in the margin account. A payment to the customer or on the customer's behalf or a transfer to any of the customer's other accounts from the SMA reduces the single entry amount.
( b ) The SMA may contain the following entries: ( 1 ) Dividend and interest payments;
( 2 ) Cash not required by this part, including cash deposited to meet a maintenance margin call or to meet any requirement of a self-regulatory organization that is not imposed by this part;
( 3 ) Proceeds of a sale of securities or cash no longer required on any expired or liquidated security position that may be withdrawn under § 220.4(e); and
( 4 ) Margin excess transferred from the margin account under § 220.4(e)(2).
[Reg. T, 63 FR 2824, Jan. 16, 1998]
§ 337.11 Effect on other banking practices. ( a ) Nothing in this part shall be construed as restricting in any manner the Corporation's authority to deal with any banking practice which is deemed to be unsafe or unsound or otherwise not in accordance with law, rule, or regulation; or which violates any condition imposed in writing by the Corporation in connection with the granting of any application or other request by an FDIC-Supervised institution, or any written agreement entered into by such institution with the Corporation. Compliance with the provisions of this part shall not relieve an FDIC-supervised institution from its duty to conduct its operations in a safe and sound manner nor prevent the Corporation from taking whatever action it deems necessary and desirable to deal with specific acts or practices which, although they do not violate the provisions of this part, are considered detrimental to the safety and sound operation of the institution engaged therein.
( b ) *Definition. FDIC-supervised institution* means an entity for which the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency pursuant to section 3(q) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(q).
[85 FR 3247, Jan. 21, 2020]
# C_2014066EN.01000401.xml

| 6.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/4

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2014/C 66/04

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 16/13/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway |
| Address | 7. juni-plassen/Victoria Terrasse |
| PO Box 8114 Dep. |
| 0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 16/13/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway

Address

7. juni-plassen/Victoria Terrasse

PO Box 8114 Dep.

0032 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.mfa.no

Title of the aid measure

Early warning system for oilspill detection in iced waters

(ad hoc grant through the Barents 2020 grant scheme)

National legal basis (reference to the relevant national official publication)

Parliamentary appropriation (Prop. 1 S (2012-2013))

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

Ad hoc grant under Barents 2020. Information about Barents 2020 may be found in Parliamentary appropriation (Prop. 1 S (2012-2013), pp. 100-101):

http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/38072348/PDFS/PRP201220130001_UDDDDPDFS.pdf

Type of measure

Ad hoc aid

ICD Industries AS

Date of granting

17.9.2013

Duration: 17.9.2013 to 1.11.2015, disbursed in annual installments, subject to parliamentary appropriations

Economic sector(s) concerned

Limited to specific sectors — please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2.

Research

NACE 72.19

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Budget

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

2013-2015: total NOK 4 million

To be disbursed in installments as follows:

| | 2013: NOK 1,5 million (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2013: NOK 1,5 million (tentative)

| | 2014: NOK 2 million (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2014: NOK 2 million (tentative)

| | 2015: NOK 0,5 million (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2015: NOK 0,5 million (tentative)

Aid instrument

(Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects
  (Article 31) | Industrial research
  (Article 31(2)(b)) | 50 % |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects

(Article 31)

Industrial research

(Article 31(2)(b))

50 %

---
§ 267.3 Referral of debts for collection action, including offset. ( a ) *In general.* To the extent not inconsistent with any applicable law or with any rule, regulation, or policy adopted by the Board in the exercise of authority granted to it under the Federal Reserve Act, the Board will refer debts covered by this regulation and which are eligible debts over 120 days delinquent to which this part applies to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for appropriate debt collection action, including but not limited to centralized offset, and offset of tax refunds. The Board may also refer any eligible debt less than 120 days delinquent to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for appropriate collection action.
( b ) *Proceedings prior to referral.* At least 60 days prior to referring a debt in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Board will send the debtor the notice described in 31 CFR 901.3(b)(4)(ii)(A), and afford the debtor the procedural protections described in 31 CFR 901.3(b)(4)(ii)(B) and 31 U.S.C. 3720A(b). However, the Board is not required to duplicate any prior notice or review opportunities that it has already afforded the debtor prior to referral.
( c ) *Non-centralized offset.* The Board may request an agency other than the U.S. Department of the Treasury to conduct non-centralized offset. Except in the situations described in 31 CFR 901.3(b)(4)(iii)(A)-(C), the Board will follow the procedures described in paragraph (b) of this section prior to making such a request. When making the request, the Board will certify in writing to the paying agency that the debtor owes the past due, legally enforceable delinquent debt in the amount stated, and that the Board has fully complied with these regulations.
§ 265.12 Functions delegated to the Secretary of the Federal Open Market Committee. The Secretary of the Federal Open Market Committee (or the Deputy Secretary in the Secretary's absence) is authorized: ( a ) *Records of policy actions.* To approve for inclusion in the Board's Annual Report to Congress, records of policy actions of the Federal Open Market Committee.
( b ) [Reserved]
EPA # 3683(h)
EPA # 3683(h)
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 26, 2010 | By:    | /s/ William      E. Meyer      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Name:      William E. Meyer    |   |
|                      |   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer |
§ 327.15 Emergency special assessments. ( a ) *Emergency special assessment imposed on June 30, 2009.* On June 30, 2009, the FDIC shall impose an emergency special assessment of 20 basis points on each insured depository institution based on the institution's assessment base calculated pursuant to § 327.5 for the second assessment period of 2009.
( b ) *Emergency special assessments after June 30, 2009.* After June 30, 2009, if the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a level that that the Board believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level which shall be close to zero or negative at the end of a calendar quarter, an emergency special assessment of up to 10 basis points may be imposed by a vote of the Board on all insured depository institutions based on each institution's assessment base calculated pursuant to § 327.5 for the corresponding assessment period. ( 1 ) *Estimation process.* For purposes of any emergency special assessment under this paragraph (b), the FDIC shall estimate the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund for the applicable calendar quarter end from available data on, or estimates of, insurance fund assessment income, investment income, operating expenses, other revenue and expenses, and loss provisions, including provisions for anticipated failures. The FDIC will assume that estimated insured deposits will increase during the quarter at the average quarterly rate over the previous four quarters.
( 2 ) *Imposition and announcement of emergency special assessments.* Any emergency special assessment under this paragraph (b) shall be on the last day of a calendar quarter and shall be announced by the end of such quarter. As soon as practicable after announcement, the FDIC will have a notice published in the Federal Register of the emergency special assessment.
( c ) *Invoicing of any emergency special assessments.* The FDIC shall advise each insured depository institution of the amount and calculation of any emergency special assessment imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. This information shall be provided at the same time as the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice for the assessment period in which the emergency special assessment was imposed.
( d ) *Payment of any emergency special assessment.* Each insured depository institution shall pay to the Corporation any emergency special assessment imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section in compliance with and subject to the provisions of §§ 327.3, 327.6 and 327.7 of subpart A, and the provisions of subpart B. The payment date for any emergency special assessment shall be the date provided in § 327.3(b)(2) for the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice for the calendar quarter in which the emergency special assessment was imposed.
[74 FR 9341, Mar. 3, 2009]
# Jurnalul Oficial C 363I/9 se

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 363I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 649 septembrie 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 363I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 649 septembrie 2021

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Rectificare la cerere de candidaturi pentru selectarea inspectorului de garanții procedurale în contextul investigațiilor efectuate de Oficiul European de Luptă Antifraudă (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( JO C 279 A, 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2021/C 363 I/01

Rectificare la cerere de candidaturi pentru selectarea inspectorului de garanții procedurale în contextul investigațiilor efectuate de Oficiul European de Luptă Antifraudă (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( JO C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

( JO C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 9.9.2021 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 363/1

---

Rectificare la cerere de candidaturi pentru selectarea inspectorului de garanții procedurale în contextul investigațiilor efectuate de Oficiul European de Luptă Antifraudă (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 279 A din 13 iulie 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

La pagina 3, punctul 4, la „
  Data-limită pentru înscriere
  ”, primul paragraf:

| în loc de: | „Data-limită pentru înscriere este 9 septembrie 2021. Înscrierea online nu va fi posibilă după ora 12.00 după-amiază, ora Bruxelles-ului.”, |
| --- | --- |

în loc de:

„Data-limită pentru înscriere este 9 septembrie 2021. Înscrierea online nu va fi posibilă după ora 12.00 după-amiază, ora Bruxelles-ului.”,

| se citește: | „Data-limită pentru înscriere este 23 septembrie 2021. Înscrierea online nu va fi posibilă după ora 12.00 după-amiază, ora Bruxelles-ului.” |
| --- | --- |

se citește:

se citește:

„Data-limită pentru înscriere este 23 septembrie 2021. Înscrierea online nu va fi posibilă după ora 12.00 după-amiază, ora Bruxelles-ului.”

---
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3018 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3018

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit members of the 
   Selected Reserve the use of Reserve Montgomery GI Bill education 
       benefits for payment for licensing or certification tests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

  Mr. Evans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit members of the 
   Selected Reserve the use of Reserve Montgomery GI Bill education 
       benefits for payment for licensing or certification tests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF RESERVE MONTGOMERY GI BILL EDUCATION BENEFITS FOR 
              PAYMENT FOR LICENSING OR CERTIFICATION TESTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 16131 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(j)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the amount of educational 
assistance payable under this chapter for a licensing or certification 
test described in section 3452(b) of title 38, is the lesser of $2,000 
or the fee charged for the test.
    ``(2) The number of months of entitlement charged in the case of 
any individual for such licensing or certification test is equal to the 
number (including any fraction) determined by dividing the total amount 
of educational assistance paid such individual for such test by the 
full-time monthly institutional rate of educational assistance which, 
but for paragraph (1), such individual would otherwise be paid under 
subsection (b).
    ``(3) In no event shall payment of educational assistance under 
this subsection for such a test exceed the amount of the individual's 
available entitlement under this chapter.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2004, and shall apply to tests administered 
on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 263.100 Authority and scope.

This subpart implements the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act (5 U.S.C. 504) as they apply to formal adversary adjudications before the Board. The types of proceedings covered by this subpart are listed in §§ 263.1 and 263.50.
# C_2022202EN.01001501.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/15

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/11)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 4 February 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88071 |
| Decision No | 34/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 Amendments to the Resilience grants scheme |
| Legal basis | Act on Resilience Grants No 160/2020 (lög um viðspyrnustyrki) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To contribute to the continued economic activity of undertakings that have suffered loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | ISK 27,2 billion for the period from 1 November 2020 to June 2022 |
| Duration | Until June 2022 |
| Economic sectors | All Sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Iceland Revenue and Customs |
| Tryggvagata 19 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

4 February 2022

Case No

88071

Decision No

34/22/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 Amendments to the Resilience grants scheme

Legal basis

Act on Resilience Grants No 160/2020 (lög um viðspyrnustyrki)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To contribute to the continued economic activity of undertakings that have suffered loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

ISK 27,2 billion for the period from 1 November 2020 to June 2022

Duration

Until June 2022

Economic sectors

All Sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Iceland Revenue and Customs

Tryggvagata 19

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 308.507 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint will be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.C. App.). Service is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by: ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or his or her representative.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40649 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR CANTU-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-CR-1073

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Oscar Cantu-Rios pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) by being found in the United States, without permission, following his conviction of an aggravated felony and subsequent deportation. The district court sentenced him to serve 46 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Cantu-Rios argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions set forth in 8 U.S.C.No. 04-40649 -2- § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), because they do not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Cantu-Rios concedes, his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).
See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Cantu-Rios also argues for the first time on appeal that if Almendarez-Torres is overruled, the Supreme Court’s holding in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), renders unconstitutional the district court’s calculation of his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on facts relating to his prior convictions that were neither found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt nor admitted by him. Cantu-Rios concedes that in addition to the obstacle posed by Almendarez-Torres , his argument regarding the effect of Blakely is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), in which this court held that Blakely does not extend to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 238.118 Applicability. ( a ) *General applicability.* A covered savings and loan bank holding company must comply with the risk-committee requirements set forth in this subpart beginning on the first day of the ninth quarter following the date on which its average total consolidated assets equal or exceed $50 billion.
( b ) *Cessation of requirements.* A covered savings and loan holding company will remain subject to the requirements of this subpart until the earlier of the date on which: ( 1 ) Its total consolidated assets are below $50 billion for each of four consecutive calendar quarters; and
( 2 ) It becomes subject to the requirements of subpart N of this part.