alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012376EN.01000501.xml

| 6.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/5

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2012/C 376/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 4 July 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 65139 |
| Decision number | : | 260/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Skien Airport |
| Legal basis | : | Articles 61(1) and 59(2) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | No aid/public service obligation (no objections)/case closure |
| Form of aid | : | Grant/soft loan |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Municipality of Skien |
| Postbox 158 |
| 3701 Skien |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

4 July 2012

Case number

:

65139

Decision number

:

260/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Skien Airport

Legal basis

:

Articles 61(1) and 59(2) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

:

No aid/public service obligation (no objections)/case closure

Form of aid

:

Grant/soft loan

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Municipality of Skien

Postbox 158

3701 Skien

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
Modification to Terms of Employment



 Exhibit 10.2 

Modification to Terms of Employment for Melissa Ernst 

January 23, 2015 
 Dear Melissa: 

The following will modify your Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2010, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”) with Quality
Distribution, Inc. (the “Company) effective as of the date set forth above (the “Effective Date”). 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.3 is amended by substituting the following for the first sentence thereof: 

 The
Executive shall be eligible at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to receive an annual equity award, at target, equal to 50% of Executive’s base salary compensation. 

The Company requests your signature and your subsequent delivery of this letter agreement to the Company to evidence confirmation of your
understanding of, and agreement to, the above-described changes to the terms of your employment as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	QUALITY DISTRIBUTION, INC.
		
	By:		




			Gary R. Enzorb
			Chief Executive Officer

 Agreed to and accepted as of the date first written above. 

 

			
		
	By:		




			Melissa Ernst
Order filed April 26, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 19
- 00321
- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF J .S.A
- S., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008
- 39339



### ORDER This appeal is from an order signed December 20 , 2018 . Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. “ A party who files a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule .” See Tex. R. Civ . P. 145(a)

. Appellant has not been ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. Therefore, appellant is deemed indigent for purposes of the appellate record. The official cou rt reporter for the 234th District Court is directed to file the reporter’s record on or before April 30, 2019

. PER CURIAM
§ 25.46 Public engagement. ( a ) *In general.* The appropriate Federal banking agency encourages communication between members of the public and banks or savings associations, including through members of the public submitting written public comments regarding community credit needs and opportunities as well as a bank's or savings association's record of helping to meet community credit needs. The appropriate Federal banking agency will take these comments into account in connection with the bank's or savings association's next scheduled CRA examination.
( b ) *Submission of public comments.* Members of the public may submit public comments regarding community credit needs and a bank's or savings association's CRA performance by submitting comments to the appropriate Federal banking agency at *“ CRAComments@occ.treas.gov*, or by mailing comments to: Compliance Risk Policy Division, Bank Supervision Policy, OCC, Washington, DC 20219, for banks and Federal savings associations; or *CRACommentCollector@fdic.gov*, or by mailing comments to the address of the appropriate FDIC regional office found at *https://www.fdic.gov/resources/bankers/community-reinvestment-act/cra-regional-contacts-list.html*, for State savings associations.
( c ) *Timing of public comments.* If the appropriate Federal banking agency receives a public comment before the close date of a bank's or savings association's CRA examination, the public comment will be considered in connection with that CRA examination. If the appropriate Federal banking agency receives a public comment after the close date of a bank's or savings association's CRA examination, it will be considered in connection with the bank's or savings association's subsequent CRA examination.
( d ) *Distribution of public comments.* The appropriate Federal banking agency will forward all public comments received regarding a bank's or savings association's CRA performance to the bank or savings association.
[89 FR 7165, Feb. 1, 2024, as amended at 89 FR 7168, Feb. 1, 2024]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00044-CV 

ROBIN L. KING APPELLANT

V.

FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On March 4, 2013, and April 10, 2013, we notified appellant in accordance 

with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless 

the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid

the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: May 16, 2013

 2

See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil 

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing 

fees in courts of appeals).
NUMBER 13-13-00425-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOASH SOLIS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 329th District Court 

of Wharton County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Joash Solis, attempts to appeal his conviction for assault. The trial 

court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of 

appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On August 13, 2013, we ordered appellant's counsel to, within thirty days, review 

the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. Counsel did not respond and the case was abated and remanded 

to the trial court on August 30, 2013. On September 24, 2013, the trial court issued 

findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellant has waived his right to appeal. This 

appeal is hereby REINSTATED. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be 

dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this 

appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

7th day of November, 2013.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 12589-001-CO]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new major license for the Tacoma Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 12589), located on Cascade, Little Cascade and Elbert Creeks in San Juan and La Plata Counties, Colorado. The project currently occupies, in part, 233.4 acres of federal land in the San Juan National Forest administered by the U.S. Forest Service.

Staff prepared a final environmental assessment (EA) that analyzes the probable environmental effects of relicensing the project and concludes that relicensing the project, with appropriate staff-recommended environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access documents. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​esubscription.asp*                     to be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

For further information, contact David Turner at (202) 502-6091.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-24255 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Opinion issued February 27 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 19 - 00831 - CV

——————————— TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , Appella nt

V. ORINOCO NATURAL RESO URCES, LLC, THOMAS M. CLARKE, AN D ANA M. CLARKE, Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2018 - 44621
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Tetra Technologies, Inc., has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal
. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot
.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower
.
#### § 303.226 When must an application be filed?

Except for situations in which no application is required under this subpart, an application must be filed when there is present a conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction for a covered offense by any adult or minor treated as an adult, or when such person has a program entry regarding that offense. Before an application is considered by the FDIC, all of the sentencing requirements associated with a conviction, or conditions imposed by the program entry, including but not limited to, imprisonment, fines, condition of rehabilitation, and probation requirements, must be completed, and the case must be considered final by the procedures of the applicable jurisdiction. The FDIC's application forms as well as additional information concerning section 19 can be accessed at the FDIC's regional offices or on the FDIC's website.
#### § 308.15 Opportunity for informal settlement.

Any respondent may, at any time in the proceeding, unilaterally submit to Enforcement Counsel written offers or proposals for settlement of a proceeding, without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties. Any such offer or proposal may only be made to Enforcement Counsel. Submission of a written settlement offer does not provide a basis for adjourning or otherwise delaying all or any portion of a proceeding under this part. No settlement offer or proposal, or any subsequent negotiation or resolution, is admissible as evidence in any proceeding.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal
Management, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice
President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Daniel W. Dienst
--------------------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
August 3, 2006

/s/ Robert C. Larry
--------------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
August 3, 2006

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014081EN.01001401.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/14

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

of 31 October 2013

in Case E-2/12

INT, HOB-vín ehf.

(Interpretation of a judgment — Advisory opinion — Application manifestly inadmissible)

2014/C 81/14

In Case E-2/12 INT, HOB-vín ehf. — APPLICATION under Article 39 of the Statute of the Court and Article 95 of the Rules of Procedure for an interpretation of the judgment of the Court of 11 December 2012 in Case E-2/12 HOB-vín [2012] EFTA Ct. Rep. 1092, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave order on 31 October 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

HOB-vín

The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

---
# C_2017198EN.01000601.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 1 March 2017

in Case E-10/16

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/68/EU on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment)

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/68/EU on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment)

(2017/C 198/06)

In Case E-10/16, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 6a and at point 6e of Chapter VIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment) as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement Article 13 of the Act within the time prescribed or, in any event, by failing to inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority thereof, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 1 March 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 6a and at point 6e of Chapter VIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement Article 13 of the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 6a and at point 6e of Chapter VIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement Article 13 of the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committee will conduct a public meeting on Thursday, October 29, 2009. The meeting will take place in the first floor hearing room of the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. At this meeting, the committee will discuss convergence issues relating to the Chicago Board of Trade's wheat contract.

                    The meeting is open to the public. The meeting will be Web cast on the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.cftc.gov*. Members of the public also can listen to the meeting by telephone. The public access call-in numbers are (866) 811-0403 (U.S.) and (404) 537-3349 (International). When calling in, please request Conference No. 34979957. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the committee should mail a copy of the statement to the attention of: Agricultural Advisory Committee, c/o Chairman Michael V. Dunn, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements should inform Chairman Dunn in writing at the foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for oral presentations of no more than five minutes each in duration.                

For further information concerning this meeting, please contact Nicole McNair at (202) 418-5070.

Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on October 8, 2009.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-24728 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### § 263.70 Purpose and scope.

The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart apply to informal hearings afforded to any institution-affiliated party for whom the Board is the appropriate regulatory agency, who has been suspended or removed from office or prohibited from further participation in any manner in the conduct of the institution's affairs by a notice or order issued by the Board upon the grounds set forth in section 8(g) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(g)).
#### § 313.163 Notification of debts of 180 days or less.

The Director, in his discretion, may also notify the Secretary of the Treasury of debts that have been delinquent for 180 days or less, including debts the FDIC seeks to recover by means of salary offset.
#### §§ 313.56-313.79 [Reserved]
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"), I,
David P. Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
      David P. LiebermanDAVID
      P. LIEBERMAN
                  Prin.
      Accounting OfficerDated:  August
      10, 2009