alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021414EN.01000201.xml

| 13.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 October 2021

(2021/C 414/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1555 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4408 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84755 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1078 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0729 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8608 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,376 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5805 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,4044 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5660 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4395 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9915 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6591 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5664 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4522 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5155 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 396,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8132 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,711 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,0176 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,501 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3977 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0232 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,2720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1555

JPY

Japanese yen

131,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4408

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84755

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1078

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0729

ISK

Iceland króna

150,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8608

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,376

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5805

RON

Romanian leu

4,9499

TRY

Turkish lira

10,4044

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5660

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4395

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9915

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6591

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5664

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,40

ZAR

South African rand

17,2650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4522

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5155

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 396,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8132

PHP

Philippine peso

58,711

RUB

Russian rouble

83,0176

THB

Thai baht

38,501

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3977

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0232

INR

Indian rupee

87,2720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
J-S36015-15

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: D.E.A.

APPEAL OF: E.A., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1647 WDA 2014

Appeal from the PCRA Order entered August 4, 2014

in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County,

Orphans’ Court, at No(s): 151 of 2013-D

BEFORE: PANELLA, JENKINS, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED:August 26, 2015 

Because Mother was not permitted to take care of Child’s daily needs, 

as she was only granted supervised visitation, and because she did attend 

her scheduled visits with Child, I cannot agree that the record provides clear 

and convincing evidence that she refused or failed to perform parental 

duties, as is required for termination under subsection 2511(a)(1). See, 

e.g., In re I.J., 972 A.2d 5, 10 (Pa. Super. 2009) (agreeing evidence was 

insufficient under subsection (a)(1) where the parents attended their 

scheduled visitation sessions). 

However, I agree that the Agency met its burden under subsection 

2511(a)(8), which requires proof of the following three things: (1) the child 

has been in placement for a year or more, “[(2)] the conditions which led to 

the removal or placement of the child continue to exist and [(3)] termination 

of parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare of the child.” 23 

Pa.C.S. § 2511(a)(8). 
J-S36015-15

- 2 -

Here, the Agency offered clear and convincing proof that Mother has 

failed to remedy the drug-related conditions that led to Child’s placement, 

after she was given more than a year of time and assistance to do so. See

Majority Memorandum at 2-3 (discussing Mother’s lack of compliance and 

progress with FSP goals). The evidence also established that terminating 

Mother’s parental rights serves Child’s best interests. See id. at 11-13 

(detailing the testimony of psychologist Carol Hughes and caseworker Susan 

Storer). Further, as the Majority properly holds, the Agency met its burden 

under subsection 2511(b). See id.

Therefore, I would affirm the termination of Mother’s rights under 

subsections (a)(8) and (b). 

Judge Jenkins joins this concurring memorandum.
# C_2023278EN.01000101.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 278/01)

Last publication

OJ C 271, 31.7.2023

Past publications

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023

OJ C 252, 17.7.2023

OJ C 235, 3.7.2023

OJ C 223, 26.6.2023

OJ C 216, 19.6.2023

OJ C 205, 12.6.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3125

To protect the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. BARTLETT of 

Maryland, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GOODE, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. OTTER, and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

A BILL

To protect the Second Amendment to the United States 

Constitution.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Keep and 

5 Bear Arms Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that—

8 (1) over the past decade, the United Nations 

9 has demonstrated a consistent animus to the Second 
2

•HR 3125 IH 

1 Amendment to the United States Constitution and 

2 to the right to keep and bear arms; 

3 (2) in June, 2003, the United Nations spon4 sored a ‘‘Week of Action Against Small Arms’’; 

5 (3) French President Jacques Chirac and the 

6 socialist president of Brazil, Luiz Lula da Silva, 

7 both advocate the imposition of a United Nations 

8 tax on firearms for various utopian purposes; 

9 (4) 2,000,000 largely unarmed people are killed 

10 yearly by oppressive genocidal governments through11 out the world; and 

12 (5) ironically, at the same time the United Na13 tions was working to prohibit Americans from exer14 cising their Second Amendment rights to defend 

15 themselves, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 

16 Firearms was called to investigate the illegal posses17 sion of submachine guns by bodyguards to Secretary 

18 General of the United Nations Kofi Annan. 

19 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON FUNDS. 

20 No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of 

21 law may be used for the promotion of any agreement, trea22 ty, conference, document, or other action by the United 

23 Nations, or any instrumentality thereof, which advocates 

24 the taxation of firearms or any other measure which would 
3

•HR 3125 IH 

1 constitute any abrogation of rights under the Second 

2 Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

3 SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 It is the sense of the Congress that proposals to tax 

5 or otherwise limit rights under the Second Amendment to 

6 the United States Constitution are reprehensible and de7 serving of condemnation. 

8 SEC. 5. DEFINITION. 

9 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘promotion’’ 

10 means any action undertaken by any official of the United 

11 States Government to advance the adoption, by the United 

12 States or any other country, of any agreement or treaty 

13 referred to in section 3, or to support any conference, doc14 ument, or other action referred to in section 3, including, 

15 but not limited to, signing any such written instrument 

16 by the United States.

Æ
# C_2013309EN.01000501.xml

| 24.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 22 July 2013

in Case E-9/12

Iceland v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Sale of land by public authorities — Market investor principle — State Aid Guidelines — Well-publicised bidding procedure comparable to an auction — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 309/05

In Case E-9/12, Iceland v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for the partial annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 261/12/COL of 4 July 2012 concerning municipal tax measures, the sale of real estate and the sale of electricity to Verne Holdings ehf., the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 22 July 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the application;

| 2. | orders the applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
#### TARPLEY V. W. T. RAWLEIGH MEDICINE CO.

(Decided May 13, 1913.)

Appeal from Lee Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Lum Duke.

O. S. Lewis, for appellant. Barnes & Denson, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58104-58105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Availability of the Fiscal Year 2011 Inventory of Contracts for 
Services

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD announces the availability of the Inventory of Contracts 
for Services for Fiscal Year 2011 pursuant to section 807 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2008. Inventory is 
available to the public.

DATES: Comments should be submitted by October 10, 2012.

[[Page 58105]]

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to: Office of the Director, Defense 
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, ATTN: OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (CPIC), 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Comments also may be 
submitted by email to Jeffrey.Grover@osd.mil.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Grover, telephone 703-697-9352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 2330a of title 10 
United States Code, as amended by section 807 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, the Office of the Deputy 
Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Contract Policy 
and International Contracting (DPAP/CPIC) will make available to the 
public the annual inventory of contracts for services. The inventory is 
posted to the Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Web site at: 
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp/acquisition_of_services_policy.html.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2012-23050 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2009-OS-0146]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is proposing to delete 
the DUSDA 02 systems of records notice from its existing inventory of 
record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
November 12, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Office of Freedom 
of Information, Washington Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address above.
    The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete a system 
of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: October 6, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.


Deletion:
DUSDA 02

SYSTEM NAME:
    Personnel Administration Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).

REASON:
    Based on a recent review of DUSDA 02, it was determined that this 
system of records is covered under the Government-wide SORNs, OPM 
Govt--1 (General Personnel Records) and OPM Govt--5. DUSDA 02 is 
duplicative and can therefore be deleted.

[FR Doc. E9-24506 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
427 A.2d 251

#### Commonwealth v. Neely, Appellant.

David R. Esh-elman, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

J. Michael Morrissey, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P.J., and SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.20(b)


Management and Personnel Services Agreement between Southern Energy PJM
Management, LLC and Southern Energy Chalk Point, LLC dated as of December 19,
2000

Management and Personnel Services Agreement between Southern Energy PJM
Management, LLC and Southern Energy D.C. O&M, LLC dated as of December 19, 2000
" ! COMMITTEE PRINT 110TH CONGRESS

1st Session

S. PRT.

110–10

TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY

ANNOTATED

INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS FROM THE

TRADE ACT OF 1974 AND THE TRADE ACT OF

2002 AS AMENDED

COMMITTEE ON FINANCE

UNITED STATES SENATE

MAX BAUCUS, Chairman

Annotations by William G. Dauster

Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel

Committee on Finance

FEBRUARY 2007

TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY ANNOTATED—INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS FROM THE TRADE ACT OF 1974

AND THE TRADE ACT OF 2002 AS AMENDED

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

1

33–180

" ! COMMITTEE PRINT 110TH CONGRESS

1st Session

S. PRT.

2007

110–10

TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY

ANNOTATED

INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS FROM THE

TRADE ACT OF 1974 AND THE TRADE ACT OF

2002 AS AMENDED

COMMITTEE ON FINANCE

UNITED STATES SENATE

MAX BAUCUS, Chairman

Annotations by William G. Dauster

Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel

Committee on Finance

FEBRUARY 2007

COMMITTEE ON FINANCE

MAX BAUCUS, Montana, Chairman

JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia

KENT CONRAD, North Dakota

JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico

JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts

BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas

RON WYDEN, Oregon

CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York

DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan

MARIA CANTWELL, Washington

KEN SALAZAR, Colorado

CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah

TRENT LOTT, Mississippi

OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine

JON KYL, Arizona

CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming

GORDON SMITH, Oregon

JIM BUNNING, Kentucky

MIKE CRAPO, Idaho

PAT ROBERTS, Kansas

RUSSELL SULLIVAN, Democratic Staff Director

KOLAN DAVIS, Republican Staff Director and Chief Counsel

(II)
#### § 313.86 Hearing official.

A hearing official may be any qualified individual, as determined by the FDIC, including an administrative law judge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         428,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,317,900
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,590,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,421,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,302,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,421,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               952,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               720,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                232,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   232,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis J. Tarallo,
Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
    Report.








Date: August
      7, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Francis
      J. TaralloFrancis
      J. TaralloChief
      Financial Officer






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2005112EN.01000801.xml

| 12.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/8

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that the measure is compatible with the EEA Agreement

(2005/C 112/04)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Iceland

Aid No: 47646

Title: The Icelandic Housing Financing Fund and an increase of lending by that fund up to 90 % of the purchase price of housing

Objective: To promote, through the granting of loans, the ability of people to have access to house financing on equal conditions throughout the country along with the special allocation of funds to increase people's chances of acquiring or renting housing on manageable terms

Legal basis: Act on Housing Affairs 1998 No 44, as amended by Act No 57/2004; Regulation No 544/2004 on the Finances and Risk Management of the Housing Financing Fund; Regulation No 522/2004 on the Housing Financing Fund's Mortgages and Bonds; and Regulation No 521/2004 on Loan Proportions and Maximum Amounts of the Housing Financing Fund's Mortgages

Duration: Unlimited

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
Exhibit 10.23

                  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREMENT

      This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") dated as of September 1 to the
Restricted Stock Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of May 1, 1995, between
Unilab Corporation (the "Corporation") and Richard A. Michaelson ("Michaelson"),
is entered into between the Corporation and Michaelson for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged.

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1. Section 3 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the section and replacing
   it in its entirety with the following: "The Restriction shall lapse and have
   no further force or effect on January 1, 1998."

      In addition, this Amendment confirms that the Corporation's Board of
Directors has determined that none of the shares subject to the Agreement will
be forfeited pursuant to Section 5 of the Agreement.

      Except as expressly provided above, the Agreement shall remain unchanged
and in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

                       UNILAB CORPORATION

                       By:
                           ------------------------------
                       Name:
                       Title:



                       By:
                           ------------------------------
                       Name:      Richard A. Michaelson
                       Address:   11-18 Fairhaven Place
                                  Fair Lawn, NJ  07410