alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Leslie_Cramer@aksteel.com [mailt o:Leslie_Cramer@aksteel.com]

Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:33 PM

To: Richard Parker; Eric_Petersen@aksteel.com

Cc: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Brian Coffey; Bruce Smith; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Pete rson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard Parker; Rick Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert va n Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo Subject: Comments on Supply

You are receiving this email as the original message was too large. This is email 1 of 2.

As requested, please find attached our comments regarding core material supply.

Leslie Cramer

Administrative Assistant

Research AK Steel Corporation leslie_cramer@ aksteel.com (513) 425-5908

Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,274
<SECURITIES>                                     1,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,098
<PP&E>                                           7,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,601
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,344
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,853
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2810

To establish a pilot program of Afghanistan scholarships for undergraduate 

and graduate level public policy internships in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2003

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

A BILL

To establish a pilot program of Afghanistan scholarships 

for undergraduate and graduate level public policy internships in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Afghanistan Education 

5 Enhancement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AFGHANISTAN SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR PUB7 LIC POLICY INTERNSHIPS. 

8 (a) PILOT PROGRAM ESTABLISHED.—As part of the 

9 educational and cultural exchange programs of the De10 partment of State, the Secretary of State shall establish 
2

•HR 2810 IH 

1 a pilot program for the fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006, 

2 of scholarships for undergraduate and graduate students 

3 from Aghanistan for public policy internships in the 

4 United States. Subject to the availability of appropria5 tions, for each fiscal year 20 students shall participate in 

6 the program established under this section. 

7 (b) GENERAL PROVISIONS.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise pro9 vided in this section, the program established pursu10 ant to subsection (a) shall be carried out under ap11 plicable provisions of the United States Information 

12 and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Mu13 tual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 

14 1961. 

15 (2) SCHOLARSHIP ELIGIBILITY REQUIRE16 MENTS.—In addition to such other requirements as 

17 may be established by the Secretary of State, a 

18 scholarship recipient under this section—

19 (A) shall be proficient in the English lan20 guage; 

21 (B) shall be a student at an undergraduate 

22 or graduate school level at an accredited insti23 tution of higher education with a record of out24 standing academic achievement and dem25 onstrated intellectual abilities; and 
3

•HR 2810 IH 

1 (C) may not have received an academic 

2 scholarship or grant from the United States 

3 Government in the 3 years preceding the award 

4 of a scholarship under this section. 

5 (3) INTERNSHIPS.—Internships under this sec6 tion shall be for periods of not more than 6 months. 

7 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In addi8 tion to such amounts as are otherwise authorized to be 

9 appropriated for the Department of State for educational 

10 and cultural exchange programs, there are authorized to 

11 be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 2004, 2005, 

12 and 2006, $250,000 to carry out this Act.

Æ
BLD-152 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1276

___________ In re: WILLIAM HENRY COLEMAN, Petitioner

____________________________________ Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to: D.N.J. Civil No. 09-cv-03509)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 18, 2010 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge , RENDELL and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

. (Filed May 21, 2010)

_________ OPINION OF THE COURT

_________ PER CURIAM In July 2009, petitioner William Henry Coleman, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed in the District Court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The District Court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. On October 27, 2009, Coleman filed a motion for reconsideration. He filed this pro se mandamus petition on January 27, 2010, requesting that the District Court act on his motion. Mandamus is a drastic remedy available only in extraordinary cases, see In re Diet2 Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig. , 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005), as the petitioner must demonstrate that he has “no other adequate means” to obtain the relief desired and a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). Although a district court has discretion over the management of its docket, seeIn re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig. , 685 F.2d 810, 817-18 (3d Cir. 1982), a federal appellate court “may issue a writ of mandamus on the ground that [the district court’s] undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction.” Madden , 102 F.3d at 79. We recognize that approximately five months have elapsed since the date Coleman filed his motion for reconsideration. However, we cannot conclude that the overall delay in this matter rises to the level of a denial of due process, and we are confident that the District Court will enter an order in due course. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
```

[House Report 106-708]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-708

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION FOR THE 
  ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE INDEPENDENCE DAY DISTRICT 
  WORK PERIOD

                                _______
                                

   June 28, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 541]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 541, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of a 
concurrent resolution of either House providing for the 
adjournment of the two Houses during the Independence Day 
district work period. The rule waives all points of order 
against the consideration of the resolution. Finally, the rule 
lays House Resolutions 469 and 482 on the table.
    While adjournment resolutions are ordinarily privileged, a 
point of order could be raised against the July 4th district 
work period resolution on the grounds that it violates section 
309 of the Budget Act, which requires that the House cannot 
adjourn for more than three calendar days in July if it has not 
completed action on all appropriations bills. A point of order 
could also be raised on the grounds that it violates section 
310(f) of the Budget Act, which requires that the House cannot 
adjourn for more than three calendar days in July unless the 
House has completed action on any required reconciliation 
legislation, if the budget resolution requires reconciliation.

                                  

```
10 Vessel Case Studies (June 25, 2013)

 20 car ferry (private entity)

 40 car ferry (public entity)

 108 Passenger High-Speed Ferry (private entity)

 120-passenger Cruise ship (private entity)

 149 Passenger High-Speed Ferry (private entity)

 300 Passenger Tour Vessel (private entity)

 399 Passenger Traditional Ferry (public entity)

 450 Passenger High-Speed Ferry (public entity)

 600 Passenger Dinner Vessel (private entity)

 4,400 Passenger Vehicle Ferry (public entity)
§ 303.41 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Branch* , except as provided in this paragraph, includes any branch bank, branch office, additional office, or any branch place of business located in any State of the United States or in any territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands at which deposits are received or checks paid or money lent. A branch does not include an automated teller machine, an automated loan machine, a remote service unit, or a facility described in section 303.46. The term branch also includes the following: ( 1 ) A *messenger service* that is operated by a bank or its affiliate that picks up and delivers items relating to transactions in which deposits are received or checks paid or money lent. A messenger service established and operated by a non-affiliated third party generally does not constitute a branch for purposes of this subpart. Banks contracting with third parties to provide messenger services should consult with the FDIC to determine if the messenger service constitutes a branch.
( 2 ) A *mobile branch,* other than a messenger service, that does not have a single, permanent site and uses a vehicle that travels to various locations to enable the public to conduct banking business. A mobile branch may serve defined locations on a regular schedule or may serve a defined area at varying times and locations.
( 3 ) A *temporary branch* that operates for a limited period of time not to exceed one year as a public service, such as during an emergency or disaster situation.
( 4 ) A *seasonal branch* that operates at various periodically recurring intervals, such as during state and local fairs, college registration periods, and other similar occasions.
( b ) *Branch relocation* means a move within the same immediate neighborhood of the existing branch that does not substantially affect the nature of the business of the branch or the customers of the branch. Moving a branch to a location outside its immediate neighborhood is considered the closing of an existing branch and the establishment of a new branch. Closing of a branch is covered in the FDIC Statement of Policy Concerning Branch Closing Notices and Policies. 1 FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts 5391; see § 309.4 (a) and (b) of this chapter for availability.
( c ) *De novo branch* means a branch of a bank which is established by the bank as a branch and does not become a branch of such bank as a result of: ( 1 ) The acquisition by the bank of an insured depository institution or a branch of an insured depository institution; or
( 2 ) The conversion, merger, or consolidation of any such institution or branch.
( d ) *Home state* means the state by which the bank is chartered.
( e ) *Host state* means a state, other than the home state of the bank, in which the bank maintains, or seeks to establish and maintain, a branch.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 35338, June 23, 2008; 73 FR 55432, Sept. 25, 2008]
§ 261.11 Records available to the public upon request. ( a ) *Procedures for requesting records.* ( 1 ) Requesters are encouraged to submit requests electronically by filling out the required information at *https://www.federalreserve.gov/secure/forms/efoiaform.aspx .* Alternatively, requests may be submitted in writing to the Office of the Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Attn: FOIA Requests, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551; or sent by facsimile to the Office of the Secretary, (202) 872-7565. Clearly mark the request FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST.
( 2 ) A request may not be combined with any other request or with any matter presented to the Board such as a protest on a pending application or a comment on a public rulemaking. It may, however, be combined with a request for records under the Privacy Act pursuant to 12 CFR 261a.5(a) or a request for discretionary release of confidential supervisory information pursuant to § 261.23.
( b ) *Contents of request.* A request must include: ( 1 ) The requester's name, address, daytime telephone number, and an email address if available.
( 2 ) A description of the records that enables the Board's staff to identify and produce the records with reasonable effort and without unduly burdening or significantly interfering with any of the Board's operations. Whenever possible, the request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record.
( 3 ) A statement agreeing to pay the applicable fees. If the information requested is not intended for a commercial use (as defined in § 261.16(d)(1)) and the requester seeks a reduction or waiver of fees because he or she is either a representative of the news media, an educational institution, or a noncommercial scientific institution, the requester should include the information called for in § 261.16(g)(2).
( c ) *Perfected and defective requests.* ( 1 ) The Board will consider the request to be perfected on the date the Office of the Secretary receives a request that contains all of the information required by paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section.
( 2 ) The Board need not accept or process a request that does not reasonably describe the records requested or that does not otherwise comply with the requirements of this section.
( 3 ) The Board may return a defective request, specifying the deficiency. The requester may submit a corrected request, which will be treated as a new request.
§ 238.23 Rebuttable presumption of noncontrol of a company. ( a ) In any proceeding under § 238.21(b) or (c) of this part, a first company is presumed not to control a second company if: ( 1 ) The first company controls less than 10 percent of the outstanding securities of each class of voting securities of the second company; and
( 2 ) The first company is not presumed to control the second company under § 238.22 of this part.
( b ) In any proceeding under this subpart, or judicial proceeding under the Home Owners' Loan Act, other than a proceeding in which the Board has made a preliminary determination that a first company has the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a second company, a first company may not be held to have had control over a second company at any given time, unless the first company, at the time in question, controlled 5 percent or more of the outstanding securities of any class of voting securities of the second company, or had already been found to have control on the basis of the existence of a controlling influence relationship.
§ 1291.64 Use of repaid AHP subsidies. ( a ) *Use of repaid AHP subsidies for other AHP-eligible projects or households.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, amounts of AHP subsidy, including any interest, repaid to a Bank pursuant to this part shall be made available by the Bank for other AHP-eligible projects or households.
( b ) *Re-use of repaid AHP direct subsidies in same project* AHP direct subsidy, including any interest, repaid to a member or project sponsor, as applicable, under a Bank's General Fund and any Targeted Funds may be repaid by such parties to the Bank for subsequent disbursement to and re-use by such parties, or retained by such parties for subsequent re-use, as authorized by the Bank, in its discretion, after consultation with its Advisory Council, in its AHP Implementation Plan, provided all of the following requirements are satisfied: ( 1 ) The member or the project sponsor originally provided the AHP direct subsidy as down payment, closing cost, rehabilitation, or interest rate buy down assistance to an eligible household for purchase, or for purchase in conjunction with rehabilitation, of an owner-occupied unit pursuant to an approved AHP application;
( 2 ) The AHP direct subsidy, including any interest, was repaid to the member or project sponsor as a result of a sale, transfer, or assignment of title or deed of the unit prior to the end of the retention period to a subsequent purchaser that is not a low- or moderate-income household; and
( 3 ) The repaid AHP direct subsidy is made available by the member or project sponsor, within the period of time specified by the Bank in its AHP Implementation Plan, to another AHP-eligible household for purchase, or for purchase in conjunction with rehabilitation, of an owner-occupied unit in the same project in accordance with the terms of the approved AHP application.
[83 FR 61231, Nov. 28, 2018, as amended at 87 FR 32969, June 1, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 225

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

#### § 225.136 Utilization of foreign subsidiaries to sell long-term debt obligations in foreign markets and to transfer the proceeds to their United States parent(s) for domestic purposes.

For text of this interpretation, see § 211.112 of this subchapter.

[42 FR 752, Jan. 4, 1977]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6137

MARK MCCOY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN CARTLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:16-cv-00638-HMH)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Sherrie 

Ann Butterbaugh, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark McCoy seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition and the court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCoy has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McCoy’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED