alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 238.64 Election required. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided below, a savings and loan holding company that wishes to engage in financial holding company activities must have an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company.
( b ) *Activities performed under separate HOLA authority.* A savings and loan holding company that conducts only the following activities is not required to elect to be treated as a financial holding company: ( 1 ) *BHC Act section 4(c)(8) activities.* Activities permissible under section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(2)(F)(i)).
( 2 ) *Insurance agency or escrow business activities.* Activities permissible under section 10(c)(2)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(2)(B)).
( 3 ) *“1987 List” activities.* Activities permissible under section 10(c)(2)(F)(ii) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(2)(F)(ii)).
( c ) *Existing requirements apply.* A savings and loan holding company that has not made an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company and that conducts the activities described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section remains subject to any rules and requirements applicable to the conduct of such activities.
§ 263.106 Measure of awards. ( a ) *General rule.* Awards shall be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents, and expert witnesses, provided that no award under this subpart for the fee of an attorney or agent shall exceed $75 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness shall exceed the highest rate at which the Board pays expert witnesses. An award may include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or expert witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent, or expert witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( b ) *Determination of reasonableness of fees.* In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent, or expert witness, subject to the limits set forth above, the administrative law judge shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent, or expert witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for like services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent, or expert witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( c ) *Awards for studies.* The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, test, project, or similar matter prepared on behalf of an applicant may be awarded to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate payable for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary solely for preparation of the applicant's case and not otherwise required by law or sound business or financial practice.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-10041,
333-102201, 333-92449 and 333-49168) of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. of our report dated July 15, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial
statements schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERSLLP

San
Jose, California
July 15, 2005

---



QuickLinks
#### § 308.13 Change of time limits.

Except as otherwise provided by law, the ALJ may, for good cause shown, extend the time limits prescribed by the Uniform Rules or by any notice or order issued in the proceedings. After the referral of the case to the Board of Directors pursuant to § 308.38, the Board of Directors may grant extensions of the time limits for good cause shown. Extensions may be granted at the motion of a party after notice and opportunity to respond is afforded all non-moving parties or on the Board of Directors' or the ALJ's own motion.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–491

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2005, THE

WORKPLACE GOODS JOB GROWTH AND COMPETITIVENESS ACT OF 1999

FEBRUARY 1, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 412]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 412, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2005, the

Workplace Goods Job Growth and Competitiveness Act of 1999,

under a modified open rule. The rule provides one hour of general

debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

The rule makes in order the Committee on the Judiciary amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill as an

original bill for the purpose of amendment, which shall be open for

amendment at any point. The rule further makes in order only

those amendments printed in the Congressional Record and pro

forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment

printed in the Congressional Record may be offered only by the

Member who caused it to be printed or his designee, and each

amendment shall be considered as read.

The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to

postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows

a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to

recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM06-16-000]

                    On September 30, 2009, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) filed a request for an extension of time to file comments in response to the Commission's September 10, 2009 notice [1]                                          requesting comments on the Topological and Impedance Element Ranking (TIER) Report in the above-docketed proceeding. In its motion, NERC states that it requires additional time to address questions that were raised at a public presentation for the TIER report and to submit responsive comments.                

Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of time for filing comments on the TIER report is granted to and including October 28, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power System,*                         RM06-16-000 (Notice of Public Meeting) (September 10, 2009).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-24253 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2998

AN ACT

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide

permanent authority for the exemption for certain members of the uniformed services from anotherwise-applicable requirement for the paymentof subsistence charges while hospitalized.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2998

AN ACT

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide permanent

authority for the exemption for certain members of the

uniformed services from an otherwise-applicable requirement for the payment of subsistence charges while hospitalized.
2

•HR 2998 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTION FOR

4 CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED

5 SERVICES FROM REQUIREMENT TO PAY SUB6 SISTENCE CHARGES WHILE HOSPITALIZED.

7 Subsection (c) of section 1075 of title 10, United

8 States Code (as added by section 8146(a)(2) of the De9 partment of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public

10 Law 108–87)), is repealed.

Passed the House of Representatives October 8,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 12.6 Fees.

A national bank may charge a reasonable fee for providing notification pursuant to § 12.5(b), (c), and (e). A national bank may not charge a fee for providing notification pursuant to § 12.4 or § 12.5 (a) and (d).
59–293 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–293 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 2272) TO INVEST IN INNOVATION THROUGH 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND TO IMPROVE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SUTTON, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 602] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 602, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill H.R. 2272 to invest in innovation 

through research and development, and to improve the competitiveness of the United States. The resolution waives all points of order 

against the conference report and its consideration. The resolution 

also considers the conference report as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 

XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the 

accompanying joint explanatory statement) but does not include a 

waiver of clause 10 of rule XXI as the conference report does not 

violate the PAYGO rule. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with HEARING
42772.

#### LANIER FEED MILL, INC. v. TONGE.

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where the plaintiff creditor established a prima facie right of recovery against the defendant debtor on two promissory notes and the defendant filed a plea of recoupment, based upon the plaintiff’s alleged failure to properly grade defendant’s eggs purchased by it over a period of time and failure to credit the defendant’s indebtedness accordingly as agreed, expert evidence of the classification as to *size*of one sample of defendant’s *unwashed*eggs, introduced by the defendant, had no probative value with regard to the issue of improper grading, because, in addition to grading as to size, the eggs were also routinely washed, then graded according to the United States Department of Agriculture’s standards as to cleanliness, based upon the amount of residual stains after the washing for the reason that the defendant’s grading did not eliminate the possibility that the eggs would have been found of inferior grade after being *753washed; therefore, the court erred in its judgment denying the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict.

*Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Argued May 2, 1967

Decided May 19, 1967.

*Kenyon & Gunter, Julius M. Hulsey,*for appellant.

*Davis & Davidson, Jack S. Davidson,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*
H. R. 3029

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 255 North

Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘S. Truett

Cathy Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
----

Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of TurboSonic Technologies Inc., (the"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, (the "Report"), I, Edward F. Spink,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

> 
(1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and 
(2)The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result  of operations of the Company. /s/ EDWARD F. SPINKEdward F. SpinkChief Executive OfficerSeptember 28, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of TurboSonic Technologies Inc., (the"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Forde,President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and 
(2)The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result  of operations of the Company. /s/ PATRICK J. FORDEPatrick J. FordePresident, Secretary and      Treasurer(Chief Financial Officer)September 28, 2004
# C_2006045EN.01001501.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 1 July 2005

in Case E-8/04 EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Principality of Liechtenstein

(Right of establishment — Residence requirement for one member of management board and one member of executive management in banks)

(Right of establishment — Residence requirement for one member of management board and one member of executive management in banks)

(2006/C 45/11)

In Case E-8/04, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Principality of Liechtenstein —APPLICATION seeking an order from the EFTA Court that the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to respect its obligations, arising from Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by maintaining in force Section 25 of the Banking Act (Gesetz vom 21 Oktober 1992 über die Banken und Finanzgesellschaften), whereby a residence requirement is imposed on at least one member of the management board and one member of the executive management in a bank established in its territory, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Tresselt (Judge-Rapporteur) and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judges, gave judgment of 1 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Gesetz vom 21 Oktober 1992 über die Banken und Finanzgesellschaften

| 1. | Declares that the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to respect its obligations, arising from Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, by maintaining in force Section 25 of the Banking Act (Gesetz vom 21 Oktober 1992 über die Banken und Finanzgesellschaften), whereby a residence requirement is imposed on at least one member of the management board and one member of the executive management of a bank established in its territory. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to respect its obligations, arising from Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, by maintaining in force Section 25 of the Banking Act (Gesetz vom 21 Oktober 1992 über die Banken und Finanzgesellschaften), whereby a residence requirement is imposed on at least one member of the management board and one member of the executive management of a bank established in its territory.

Gesetz vom 21 Oktober 1992 über die Banken und Finanzgesellschaften

| 2. | Orders the Principality of Liechtenstein to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Principality of Liechtenstein to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

§ 249.120 Transitions. ( a ) *Initial application.* ( 1 ) A Board-regulated institution that initially becomes subject to the minimum net stable funding requirement under § 249.1(b)(1)(i) or (ii) after July 1, 2021, must comply with the requirements of subparts K through N of this part beginning on the first day of the third calendar quarter after which the Board-regulated institution becomes subject to this part.
( 2 ) A Board-regulated institution that becomes subject to the minimum net stable funding requirement under § 249.1(b)(1)(iii) must comply with the requirements of subparts K through N of this part subject to a transition period specified by the Board.
( b ) *Transition to a different required stable funding adjustment percentage.* ( 1 ) A Board-regulated institution whose required stable funding adjustment percentage changes is subject to the transition periods as set forth in § 249.105(c).
( 2 ) A Board-regulated institution that is no longer subject to the minimum stable funding requirement of this part pursuant to § 249.1(b)(1)(i) or (ii) based on the size of total consolidated assets, cross-jurisdictional activity, total nonbank assets, weighted short-term wholesale funding, or off-balance sheet exposure calculated in accordance with the Call Report, or instructions to the FR Y-9LP, the FR Y-15, or equivalent reporting form, as applicable, for each of the four most recent calendar quarters may cease compliance with the requirements of subparts K through N of this part as of the first day of the first calendar quarter after it is no longer subject to § 249.1(b).
( c ) *Reservation of authority.* The Board may extend or accelerate any compliance date of this part if the Board determines such extension or acceleration is appropriate. In determining whether an extension or acceleration is appropriate, the Board will consider the effect of the modification on financial stability, the period of time for which the modification would be necessary to facilitate compliance with the requirements of subparts K through N of this part, and the actions the Board-regulated institution is taking to come into compliance with the requirements of subparts K through N of this part.
[86 FR 9213, Feb. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 99.2




				Exhibit 99(ii)

			    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
				 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June  30,  2003  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Jason F. Griffith, Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of  operations of  the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 12, 2003
# C_2021343EN.01002701.xml

| 26.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/27

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 343/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.5.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86828 |
| Decision No | 042/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 amendments to the aid scheme for voluntary sector organisations |
| Legal basis | The amended regulation on scheme to aid organisations in the voluntary sector (no reference number yet) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To ensure liquidity for voluntary organisations and through that stimulate activity and help voluntary organisations through the current COVID-19 crisis |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 1155 million |
| Intensity | — | Applicants may receive a grant of 70 % of additional costs and/or costs connected to the development and/or adjustment of activities |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.5.2021

Case No

86828

Decision No

042/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 amendments to the aid scheme for voluntary sector organisations

Legal basis

The amended regulation on scheme to aid organisations in the voluntary sector (no reference number yet)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To ensure liquidity for voluntary organisations and through that stimulate activity and help voluntary organisations through the current COVID-19 crisis

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 1155 million

Intensity

—

Applicants may receive a grant of 70 % of additional costs and/or costs connected to the development and/or adjustment of activities

| — | For events and other specified activities that take place as planned, applicants may receive a grant of 70 % of eligible costs |
| --- | --- |

—

For events and other specified activities that take place as planned, applicants may receive a grant of 70 % of eligible costs

| — | For events and other specified activities that are cancelled, applicants may receive a grant of 50 % of eligible costs |
| --- | --- |

—

For events and other specified activities that are cancelled, applicants may receive a grant of 50 % of eligible costs

Duration

18.5.2021 – 31.12.2021

Economic sectors

Voluntary sector

Name and address of the granting authority

| Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority |
| --- |
| P.O. Box 800 |
| N-6805 Førde |
| NORWAY |

Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority

P.O. Box 800

N-6805 Førde

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---