alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023029EN.01004201.xml

| 26.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/42

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 29 July 2022

in Case E-2/22

A v the Labour and Welfare Directorate (Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet)

(Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Social security – Family benefits – Transitional benefits – Requirement of occupational activity)

(2023/C 29/07)

In Case E-2/22, A v the Labour and Welfare Directorate (Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet) – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Norwegian National Insurance Court (Trygderetten), concerning the interpretation of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1), the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 29 July 2022, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | A benefit such as the transitional benefit at issue in the main proceedings constitutes a family benefit within the meaning of point (j) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, and is not a non-contributory cash benefit within the meaning of Article 3(3) of that regulation, read in conjunction with Article 70. |
| --- | --- |

1.

A benefit such as the transitional benefit at issue in the main proceedings constitutes a family benefit within the meaning of point (j) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, and is not a non-contributory cash benefit within the meaning of Article 3(3) of that regulation, read in conjunction with Article 70.

| 2. | In relation to a benefit such as the transitional benefit, it is not relevant in the context of the assessment under the first question that there is a requirement of occupational activity for continued entitlement to the benefit in question when the youngest child reaches the age of one year. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In relation to a benefit such as the transitional benefit, it is not relevant in the context of the assessment under the first question that there is a requirement of occupational activity for continued entitlement to the benefit in question when the youngest child reaches the age of one year.

---

(1)  OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 15, 2009 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings;

An adjudicatory matter; and

A post argument discussion.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

                    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:                          ( print page 52521)    

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: October 8, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-24702 Filed 10-8-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**EXHIBIT 12.1**
I, Eivind Reiten, President and Chief Executive Officer of Norsk Hydro ASA,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Norsk Hydro ASA; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companyand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe company’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: June 30, 2004 /s/ Eivind Reiten     Eivind Reiten   President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7159]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 30, 2011; 11 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 22, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7159 Filed 3-23-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND
     FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000795968
<NAME>                        EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         460,900
<SECURITIES>                                   1,063,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,555,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                   342,026
<INVENTORY>                                    6,591,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,832,457
<PP&E>                                         10,554,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,858,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,967,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,211,751
<BONDS>                                        6,149,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,513
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,536,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,967,549
<SALES>                                        14,164,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,164,174
<CGS>                                          8,840,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,751,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               114,636
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             318,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,306,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                   911,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,394,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,394,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .48



</TABLE>
#### ALBA LOGAN, Respondent, v. COURT OF HONOR, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

December 31, 1912.

BENEFIT CERTIFICATE: Disease: Evidence: Peremptory Instruction. Though a trial court may, in proper instances, direct a verdict for the defendant, yet where the evidence sustaining the defense is of an uncertain or indefinite character, such as to the time when treatment was given for a disease, or as to the kind of disease, the court would he without right to so instruct and properly refused to do so.

Appeal from Chariton Circuit *Court.*— Son. *Fred Lamb,*Judge.

Affirmed.

P. *J. Beiger*and *Jno. D. Taylor*for appellant.

*John T. Barker*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

This action is based on a benefit certificate of life insurance on the life of A. W. Logan, who died in 1909. The judgment in the circuit court was for the plaintiff.

Plaintiff is the widow of deceased. The certificate was issued in 1907. The defense is that deceased was afflicted with syphilis and tuberculosis, for which he had been treated by physicians within five years of his application, whereas in answer to question set *196down in the application lie stated and represented that he had not been treated for snch diseases, nor had he consulted physicians within five years previous.

The point made by defendant is that it established its defense without meeting with any contradictory evidence.

There was evidence tending strongly to show that deceased had been treated by a physician for syphilitic trouble within five years of the date of deceased’s membership. But this evidence, as given by the physician, shows he may have been mistaken in some material parts. There was evidence tending to show that he could not have treated deceased when he stated, and that his treatment may have been after deceased obtained his certificate. That he might have been mistaken was further shown by his having failed to mention such disease when he gave his deposition in the case on a former occasion. The other physician stated he was not certain whether deceased had been afflicted with syphilis.

In addition to this, plaintiff, who had been living with deceased as his wife, testified that he was not afflicted as contended by defendant.

We are satisfied that the uncertain nature of the testimony in defendant’s behalf, to say nothing of. that given by plaintiff, left the trial court without authority to direct a peremptory verdict for defendant, and it was right in refusing.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur. .
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2744 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2744

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 514 17th Street in Moline, Illinois, as the ``David Bybee Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 
17th Street in Moline, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 
``David Bybee Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``David Bybee Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05570

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05570\05570_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05570\05570_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05570\05570_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05570\05570_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05570\05570_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05570\05570_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05570\05570_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05570\05570_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05570\Certification Statement_05570.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D2-3 FGD Pilot Test Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D3-1 POND-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D3-1 WWT-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D5-10 Constructed Wetland Enhancement Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D5-10 FGD Design Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Follow Up Responses 2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Follow Up Responses.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2022202EN.01000901.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/9

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26 January 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88016 |
| Decision No | 004/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Trondheim Spektrum AS |
| Legal basis | Decision of the City Council of the Municipality of Trondheim |
| Type of measure | Ad hoc |
| Objective | COVID-19 damage compensation |
| Form of aid | One direct grant |
| Budget | NOK 5,4 million |
| Intensity | 51 % |
| Economic sectors | The operating of multipurpose facilities used for events |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Trondheim Kommune |
| Bystyret |
| P.O. Box 2300 Torgarden |
| N-7004 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

26 January 2022

Case No

88016

Decision No

004/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Trondheim Spektrum AS

Legal basis

Decision of the City Council of the Municipality of Trondheim

Type of measure

Ad hoc

Objective

COVID-19 damage compensation

Form of aid

One direct grant

Budget

NOK 5,4 million

Intensity

51 %

Economic sectors

The operating of multipurpose facilities used for events

Name and address of the granting authority

Trondheim Kommune

Bystyret

P.O. Box 2300 Torgarden

N-7004 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3056 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3056

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To clarify the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coast Barrier Resources 
      System Cedar Keys Unit P25 on Otherwise Protected Area P25P.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3056

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To clarify the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coast Barrier Resources 
      System Cedar Keys Unit P25 on Otherwise Protected Area P25P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 
              RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--Of the 2 maps subtitled ``P25/P25P'' that relate 
to the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated 
as Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys Unit P25/P25P and are 
included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), the map depicting the northernmost area of 
that unit is hereby replaced by another map relating to that unit 
entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys 
Unit P25/P25P'' and dated February 9, 2004.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 264b.3 Restrictions on acceptance of gifts and decorations. ( a ) Board employees are prohibited from requesting or otherwise encouraging the tender of a gift or decoration from a foreign government.
( b ) Board employees are prohibited from accepting a gift or decoration from a foreign government, except in accordance with this part.
### Preliminary digital Quaternary geologic map data for Indiana

By: D. R. SollerWai-See Moy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93268A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.