alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014066EN.01000601.xml

| 6.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2014/C 66/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 13 November 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 72904 |
| Decision number | : | 444/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Fjarskiptafélag Skeiða- og Gnúpverjahrepps |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Rapid deployment of broadband networks |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant |
| Budget | : | Approx. ISK 75 million |
| Intensity | : | 100 % |
| Duration | : | — |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Skeiða- og Gnúpverjahreppur |
| Árnesi |
| 801 Selfoss |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

13 November 2013

Case number

:

72904

Decision number

:

444/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Fjarskiptafélag Skeiða- og Gnúpverjahrepps

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) EEA Agreement

Type of measure

:

Rapid deployment of broadband networks

Form of aid

:

Direct grant

Budget

:

Approx. ISK 75 million

Intensity

:

100 %

Duration

:

—

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Skeiða- og Gnúpverjahreppur

Árnesi

801 Selfoss

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
swsh_ex103.htm


 


 


Exhibit 10.3


 


 





 



Dated:  May 11, 2015


 


William T. Nanovsky


 


Swisher Hygiene Inc.


 


Suite 400 4725 Piedmont Row Drive


Charlotte, NC 28210


 


Dear Mr. Nanovsky:


 


Reference is made to the Springing DACA waiver letter dated March 25, 2015.  This is to inform you that Siena has agreed to extend the waiver period of the Springing DACA Event and Reporting Requirements through May 12, 2015.


 


Please call me at 203-883 5657 if you have any further questions.


 




	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	SIENA LENDING GROUP LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Steven Sanicola	 
	 	 	By: Steven Sanicola	 
	 	 	Authorized Signatory	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 


 


 


9 Broad Street, Stamford, CT 06902 I 203.251.8282 I www.sienalending.com
# C_2022484EN.01003501.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/35

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/17)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Vatican City State

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Vatican City State

Subject of commemoration: The 25th anniversary of the death of Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Description of the design: The design features a portrait of Mother Teresa with a child. At the top, in semi-circle, is the inscription ‘MADRE TERESA DI CALCUTTA’ and at the bottom is the name of the issuing country ‘CITTÀ DEL VATICANO’. At the right of the portrait is the mintmark ‘R’ and underneath it are the years ‘1997’ and ‘2022’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 84 000

Date of issue: September 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the                           ( print page 52233)                        agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     011885-001.                

*Title:*                     CMA CGM/MSC Reciprocal Space Charter, Sailing and Cooperative Working Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     CMA CGM, S.A. and Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLC; 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would revise temporarily the provision of vessels and the allocation of space under the agreement.                

*Agreement No.:*                     011966-001.                

*Title:*                     West Coast USA-Mexico & Canada Vessel Sharing Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Compania Sud Americana de Vapores S.A.; Hamburg Süd; Compania Chilena de Navegacion Interoceania, S.A.; and Maruba S.C.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would delete Maruba S.C.A as a party to the agreement and adjust the terms under which the remaining parties will continue to operate. Parties request expedited review.                

Dated: October 6, 2009.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-24452 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# C_2013193EN.01001001.xml

| 4.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/10

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2013/C 193/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 21 November 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68640 |
| Decision number | : | 410/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged State aid through subsidised lease of optical fibres previously operated on behalf of NATO |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) EEA |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Economic sectors | : | Telecommunication |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

21 November 2012

Case number

:

68640

Decision number

:

410/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged State aid through subsidised lease of optical fibres previously operated on behalf of NATO

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) EEA

Type of measure

:

No aid

Economic sectors

:

Telecommunication

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3029

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ``S. Truett 
                     Cathy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 255 
North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``S. Truett Cathy Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 263.81 Definitions. ( a ) *Bank holding company* means any company that controls a bank as defined in section 2 of the BHC Act, 12 U.S.C. 1841, and in the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.2(b)) or any direct or indirect subsidiary thereof other than a bank subsidiary as defined in section 2(c) of the BHC Act, 12 U.S.C. 1841(c), and in the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.2(a)).
( b ) *Capital Adequacy Guidelines* means those guidelines for bank holding companies and state member banks contained in appendices A and D to the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and in appendix A to the Board's Regulation H (12 CFR part 208), or any succeeding capital guidelines promulgated by the Board.
( c ) *Directive* means a final order issued by the Board: ( 1 ) Pursuant to ILSA (12 U.S.C. 3907(b)(2)) requiring a state member bank or bank holding company to increase capital to or maintain capital at the minimum level set forth in the Board's Capital Adequacy Guidelines or as otherwise established under procedures described in § 263.85; or
( 2 ) Pursuant to HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(g)(1)) requiring a savings and loan holding company to increase capital to or maintain capital at a certain level.
( d ) *State member bank* means any state-chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System.
( e ) *Savings and loan holding company* means any company that controls a savings association as defined in section 10 of the HOLA, 12 U.S.C. 1467a, and in the Board's Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.2) or any direct or indirect subsidiary thereof other than a savings association subsidiary as defined in section 10 of the HOLA, 12 U.S.C. 1467a, and in the Board's Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.2).
[56 FR 38052, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 56604, Sept. 13, 2011]
§ 264a.5 What are the penalties for violating these special post-employment restrictions? ( a ) *Penalties under section 10(k) of FDI Act.* A senior examiner of the Federal Reserve who, after leaving the employment of the Federal Reserve, violates the restrictions set forth in § 264a.3 shall, in accordance with section 10(k)(6) of the FDI Act, be subject to one or both of the following penalties— ( 1 ) An order— ( i ) Removing the individual from office or prohibiting the individual from further participation in the affairs of the relevant state member bank, bank holding company, savings and loan holding company, foreign bank or other depository institution or company for a period of up to five years; and
( ii ) Prohibiting the individual from participating in the affairs of any insured depository institution for a period of up to five years; and/or
( 2 ) A civil monetary penalty of not more than $250,000.
( b ) *Imposition of penalties.* The penalties described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be imposed by the appropriate Federal banking agency as determined under section 10(k)(6) of the FDI Act, which may be an agency other than the Federal Reserve.
( c ) *Scope of prohibition orders.* Any senior examiner who is subject to an order issued under paragraph (a) of this section shall, as required by section 10(k)(6)(B) of the FDI Act, be subject to paragraphs (6) and (7) of section 8(e) of the FDI Act in the same manner and to the same extent as a person subject to an order issued under section 8(e).
( d ) *Procedures.* The procedures applicable to actions under paragraph (a) of this section are provided in section 10(k)(6) of the FDI Act.
( e ) *Other penalties.* The penalties set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are not exclusive, and a senior examiner who violates the restrictions in § 264a.3 also may be subject to other administrative, civil or criminal remedies or penalties as provided in law.
[70 FR 69638, Nov. 17, 2005, as amended at 76 FR 56606, Sept. 13, 2011]
#### § 308.400 Scope.

This subpart is issued by the Corporation pursuant to sections 17A(b)(3)(g), 17A(b)(5)(C), 19 and 23 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), as amended (15 U.S.C. 78q-1 (b)(3)(g), (b)(5)(C), 78s, 78w). It applies to applications by banks insured by the Corporation (other than members of the Federal Reserve System) for a stay or review of certain actions by clearing agencies registered under the Exchange Act, for which the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) is not the appropriate regulatory agency under section 3(a)(34)(B) of the Exchange Act (bank clearing agencies).
##### 



ProLogis
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Share Dividends
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Exhibit 12.2 Year Ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Earnings from Operations
    
    $
    233,542
    
    
    $
    249,190
    
    
    $
    247,592
    
    
    $
    126,822
    
    
    $
    213,158Add:Interest Expense
    
    
    153,334
    
    
    
    155,475
    
    
    
    152,958
    
    
    
    163,629
    
    
    
    172,191Earnings as Adjusted
    
    $
    386,876
    
    
    $
    404,665
    
    
    $
    400,550
    
    
    $
    290,451
    
    
    $
    385,349Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Share Dividends:Interest Expense
    
    $
    153,334
    
    
    $
    155,475
    
    
    $
    152,958
    
    
    $
    163,629
    
    
    $
    172,191Capitalized Interest
    
    
    37,388
    
    
    
    36,425
    
    
    
    30,534
    
    
    
    24,276
    
    
    
    18,549Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    190,722
    
    
    
    191,900
    
    
    
    183,492
    
    
    
    187,905
    
    
    
    190,740Preferred Share Dividends
    
    
    25,746
    
    
    
    30,485
    
    
    
    32,715
    
    
    
    37,309
    
    
    
    56,763Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Share Dividends
    
    $
    216,468
    
    
    $
    222,385
    
    
    $
    216,207
    
    
    $
    225,214
    
    
    $
    247,503Ratio of Earnings, as Adjusted
to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Share Dividends
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.6
Date: May24, 2012 TO: EPA SUBJECT: Proposed Carbon Emission Regulations Thank you for holdingthis hearing on the proposed rule for carbon emissions. We need you to protect us, as stated in your name. You are avital part in this process. I am here for myself and others like me who need these regulations. Iam a 3-time breast cancer survivor. I knowvery well how important life is and ourtime here. Iwas first diagnosed in 1994, and most recently in 2007. I have tried to live with as many healthy habits as I can. As my parentstaught me, Idon't smoke, or drink, and have never used drugs. Iworked forthe Social SecurityAdministration until 2years ago. I have 2 sisters that have never had any type of cancer. One majordifference between them and me is where we live. I have always lived in Cook County, which has airgrade of "F" perthe American Lung Association. One sister lives in Albuquerque, which is grade "B", and the other lives in Pittsburgh, which is grade "0". Iam notsaying thatthe air pollution caused my cancer, butwe still don't know the actual causes, and we can't all move to Albuquerque. One currentfact of Breast cancer is that Iam one of2.6 million breast cancer survivors alive in the U.S. today per the National Cancer Institute. We are the largest group of cancer survivors in the country. Nearly everyone in this room probably knows someone who is a survivor. That is the good news. On the otherside, Iwill always have side effects from my successful treatments. Because my immune system has been compromised, I am more sensitive to airand other environmental problems, such as air pollution. As medical science continually improves treatment (which Iapplaud, ofcourse!), even more people will survive breast cancer and will need these regulations. The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to listcategories ofthe sources that "cause or contribute significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health orwelfare." As the Supreme Court ruled in 2007, the GHGs (green house gases) meet the definition of "air pollutant". And this regulation is partofthe response. In conclusion, Iwantto continue helping others, as I did in my workfor SSA. I hope thatthese are the startofthe regulations that we all need to reduce the carbon emissions and numerous other air pollutants that are in our atmosphere. Ivery strongly hope thatyou will establish future regulations for the plantsthat are currently operating.

Above notes prepared by: Patricia Walter, Chicago, Illinois
#### Galen v. Suritsky

*Rush, Kremer & Maerz,*for plaintiff.

*Swartz, Campbell & Henry,*for defendant.

*Levy & Oliensis, Vincent C. Veldorale,*Assistant City Solicitor, *David Berger,*City Solicitor, *Michael*
      *794
      *A. Foley*and *Michael H. Egnal,*for additional defendants.

June 18, 1957.

Oliver, P. J.,

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s petition to separate two eauses of action.

Plaintiff, Joseph Galen, instituted an action in trespass against Nathan Suritsky for injuries sustained while Galen was a passenger in Suritsky’s car. A hole in the street was involved. Thus, the City of Philadelphia and Sylvester J. Lowery, a contractor, were brought in by Suritsky as additional defendants.

Suritsky filed a cross complaint against these two additional defendants for his own personal injuries and property damage. Subsequently, Galen filed another complaint against Margaret M. Murphy, driver of another automobile involved in the accident. These two actions by plaintiff were consolidated for trial. After consolidation, the city joined one John F. Igoe as another additional defendant. '

Galen is now petitioning the court to sever his claim for personal injuries from the claim for personal injuries and property damage asserted by Suritsky.

In Galen’s action against Suritsky, the city, Lowery, Igoe and Murphy, all parties to the accident, have been joined. Therefore, it would not be prejudicial, from the standpoint of establishing liability, to have Suritsky’s action severed. In addition, as Suritsky’s claim is against the city and Lowery alone, and not .against Galen, Igoe or Murphy, it would tend to confuse the jury to have both issues tried together.

Plaintiff’s petition to sever should be granted.

*Order*

And now, June 18,1957, the claim of defendant, Nathan Suritsky, for personal injuries and property damage is hereby' severed from the claim of plaintiff, Joseph Galen, for personal injuries. These two causes of action are to be tried separately.
§ 339.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form. ( a ) *Use of form.* An FDIC-supervised institution shall use the standard flood hazard determination form developed by the Administrator of FEMA when determining whether the building or mobile home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act. The standard flood hazard determination form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner. An FDIC-supervised institution may obtain the standard flood hazard determination form from FEMA's Web site at *www.fema.gov .*
( b ) *Retention of form.* An FDIC-supervised institution shall retain a copy of the completed standard flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for the period of time the FDIC-supervised institution owns the loan.