alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–611

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3709, THE

INTERNET NONDISCRIMINATION ACT

MAY 9, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 496]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 496, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 3709, the

Internet Nondiscrimination Act, under a modified open rule. The

rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

the Judiciary.

The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day

layover of the committee report) against consideration of the bill.

The waiver is necessary because the report was filed on Monday,

May 8, and the bill may be considered on the floor as early as

Wednesday, May 10. The rule makes in order the Committee on

the Judiciary amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed

in the bill as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, which

shall be open for amendment at any point. The rule provides that

the amendment process shall not exceed 2 hours.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

2

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
# C_2014207EN.01004301.xml

| 3.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/43

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2014/C 207/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 12 March 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 75005 |
| Decision number | : | 114/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Name of the beneficiary | : | BE Varme AS |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA agreement |
| Scheme | : | The Energy Fund Scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Aid amount | : | NOK 88,53 million |
| Economic sectors | : | District heating |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Brochsgt. 2 |
| N-7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

12 March 2014

Case number

Case number

:

75005

Decision number

Decision number

:

114/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Name of the beneficiary

Name of the beneficiary

:

BE Varme AS

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA agreement

Scheme

Scheme

:

The Energy Fund Scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grant

Aid amount

Aid amount

:

NOK 88,53 million

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

District heating

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Brochsgt. 2

N-7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 324.162 Mechanics of risk-weighted asset calculation. ( a ) If an FDIC-supervised institution does not qualify to use or does not have qualifying operational risk mitigants, the FDIC-supervised institution's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk is its operational risk exposure minus eligible operational risk offsets (if any).
( b ) If an FDIC-supervised institution qualifies to use operational risk mitigants and has qualifying operational risk mitigants, the FDIC-supervised institution's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk is the greater of: ( 1 ) The FDIC-supervised institution's operational risk exposure adjusted for qualifying operational risk mitigants minus eligible operational risk offsets (if any); or
( 2 ) 0.8 multiplied by the difference between: ( i ) The FDIC-supervised institution's operational risk exposure; and
( ii ) Eligible operational risk offsets (if any).
( c ) The FDIC-supervised institution's risk-weighted asset amount for operational risk equals the FDIC-supervised institution's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk determined under sections 162(a) or (b) multiplied by 12.5.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

CINDY H. THOMASSON

v. Record No. 1792-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM SARA LEE KNIT PRODUCTS, MARCH 12, 1996 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, PLUMA, INC. AND HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Peter McIntosh; Michie, Hamlett, Lowry, Rasmussen & Tweel, on brief), for appellant. (Dale W. Webb; Monica L. Taylor; Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore, on brief), for appellees Sara Lee Knit Products and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois. No brief for appellees Pluma, Inc. and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company.

Cindy H. Thomasson appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the

commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed

.
§ 343.50 Where insurance activities may take place. ( a ) *General rule.* An institution must, to the extent practicable, keep the area where the institution conducts transactions involving insurance products or annuities physically segregated from areas where retail deposits are routinely accepted from the general public, identify the areas where insurance product or annuity sales activities occur, and clearly delineate and distinguish those areas from the areas where the institution's retail deposit-taking activities occur.
( b ) *Referrals.* Any person who accepts deposits from the public in an area where such transactions are routinely conducted in the institution may refer a consumer who seeks to purchase an insurance product or annuity to a qualified person who sells that product only if the person making the referral receives no more than a one-time, nominal fee of a fixed dollar amount for each referral that does not depend on whether the referral results in a transaction.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2713 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2713

                 For the relief of Mai Thi Thuy Nuong.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Mai Thi Thuy Nuong.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MAI THI THUY NUONG.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mai Thi Thuy Nuong shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Mai Thi Thuy Nuong enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Mai Thi Thuy Nuong, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Mai Thi Thuy 
Nuong shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffect on interference fits on roller bearing fatigue lifeAn analysis was performed to determine the effects of inner-ring speed and press fits on roller bearing fatigue life. The effects of the resultant hoop and radial stresses on the principal stresses were considered. The maximum shear stresses below the Hertzian contact were determined for different conditions of inner-ring speed and load, and were applied to a conventional roller bearing life analysis. The effect of mean stress was determined using Goodman diagram approach. Hoop stresses caused by press fits and centrifugal force can reduce bearing life by as much as 90 percent. Use of a Goodman diagram predicts life reductions of 20 to 30 percent. The depth of the maximum shear stress remains virtually unchanged.Document ID19860010145Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCoe, H. H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Zaretsky, E. V.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-87165E-2516NAS 1.15:87165Accession Number86N19616Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-7CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860010145.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302 OF**

 

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert J. Pagano, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Watts Water Technologies, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date: August 12, 2016 |                           |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Robert J. Pagano, Jr. |
|                       | Robert J. Pagano, Jr.     |
| * *                   | *Chief Executive Officer*      |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,080
<INVENTORY>                                     49,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,878
<PP&E>                                         296,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,339
<BONDS>                                        352,893
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,355)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,901
<SALES>                                        451,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,807
<CGS>                                          351,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  351,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022404EN.01003501.xml

| 20.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/35

---

Notification of the Norwegian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (‘Electricity Directive’), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto and EEA Joint Committee Decision No 93/2017 of 5 May 2017, regarding the designation of Statnett SF as transmission system operator in Norway

(2022/C 404/07)

Following the Norwegian regulatory authority's final decision of 1 July 2022 regarding the certification of Statnett SF as ownership unbundled transmission system operator (Article 9 of the Electricity Directive), Norway has notified on 7 July 2022 to the EFTA Surveillance Authority the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Norway in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained from:

Royal Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

(Email: postmottak@oed.dep.no).

---
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lou
Persico, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATASCENSION INC.





2.Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:





a)designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and





c)presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a)all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.


Dated:
      August 10, 2009/s/
      Lou PersicoLou
      Persico
                    President
      and CEO and Principal Executive
Officer
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 363I/9 wr

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 363I |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 649 września 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 363I

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 649 września 2021

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do składania zgłoszeń w procedurze naboru kontrolera gwarancji proceduralnych w kontekście dochodzeń prowadzonych przez Europejski Urząd ds. Zwalczania Nadużyć Finansowych (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( Dz.U. C 279 A z 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

Sprostowania

2021/C 363 I/01

Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do składania zgłoszeń w procedurze naboru kontrolera gwarancji proceduralnych w kontekście dochodzeń prowadzonych przez Europejski Urząd ds. Zwalczania Nadużyć Finansowych (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( Dz.U. C 279 A z 13.7.2021 )

( Dz.U. C 279 A z 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 9.9.2021 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CI 363/1

---

Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do składania zgłoszeń w procedurze naboru kontrolera gwarancji proceduralnych w kontekście dochodzeń prowadzonych przez Europejski Urząd ds. Zwalczania Nadużyć Finansowych (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 279 A z dnia 13 lipca 2021 r.
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Strona 3, pkt 4, nagłówek „Termin rejestracji kandydatów”, akapit pierwszy:

| zamiast: | „Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 9 września 2021 r. Rejestracja elektroniczna zostanie zakończona o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli.”, |
| --- | --- |

zamiast:

„Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 9 września 2021 r. Rejestracja elektroniczna zostanie zakończona o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli.”,

| powinno być: | „Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 23 września 2021 r. Rejestracja elektroniczna zostanie zakończona o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli.”. |
| --- | --- |

powinno być:

powinno być:

„Termin rejestracji kandydatów upływa w dniu 23 września 2021 r. Rejestracja elektroniczna zostanie zakończona o godz. 12.00 w południe czasu obowiązującego w Brukseli.”.

---