alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     ------------------------------
                                        1998           1997        1996
                                        ----           ----        ----

Loss before income taxes             $(25,417)       $(22,142)   $(19,820)
Income taxes                            5,441              --      (8,038)
                                     --------        --------      -------
NET LOSS                             $(30,858)       $(22,142)   $ (4,782)
                                     ========        ========     ========


LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC               $  (4.36)       $  (3.52)   $  (1.87)
                                     ========        ========     ========
Weighted average shares of
 common stock outstanding               7,081           6,299       6,296
                                     ========        ========     ========


LOSS PER SHARE - DILUTED             $  (4.36)       $  (3.52)    $ (1.87)
                                     ========        ========    ========

Weighted average shares of
 common stock and common
 stock equivalents outstanding          7,081           6,299       6,296
                                     ========        ========    ========
THE UNION LIGHT, HEAT AND POWER COMPANY

Effective July 24, 1997, ARTICLE THIRD of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
of The Union  Light,  Heat and Power  Company  was  amended and now reads as set
forth below:

                                  ARTICLE THIRD

The place in the Commonwealth of Kentucky where the registered office is located
is C T  Corporation  System,  c/o Kentucky  Home Life  Building,  in the City of
Louisville,  and the County of Jefferson, and the principal place of business of
the Company is located at 107 Brent Spence Square, in the City of Covington, and
the County of Kenton.






Effective July 24, 1997, Section 1 of ARTICLE I of the By-Laws of The Union
Light, Heat and Power Company was amended and now reads as set forth below:


                                    ARTICLE I

                                     Offices

Section 1. Offices. The registered office of the Corporation shall be located in
the  City  of  Louisville,  Jefferson  County,  Commonwealth  of  Kentucky.  The
Corporation  may establish  branch  offices and conduct and carry on business at
such other places within or without the Commonwealth of Kentucky as the Board of
Directors may from time to time fix or designate,  and any business conducted or
carried on at such other place or places shall be as binding and effectual as if
transacted at the registered office of the Corporation.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-132-CV

JIANGTAO LI APPELLANT

V.

BING XIAO APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Jiangtao Li attempts to appeal from a document entitled “Temporary

Orders” and one entitled “Amended Temporary Orders,” both issued in a divorce

suit. Because there does not appear to be a final, appealable judgment in the suit,

we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The trial court signed the “Temporary Orders” at issue on January 28, 2010.

Li filed a pro se notice of appeal the following day. On February 25, 2010, we

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
notified the parties of our concern that this court may not have jurisdiction over the

appeal because the “Temporary Orders” did not appear to be an appealable order.

We informed the parties that unless Li or any party desiring to continue the appeal

filed with the court a response by March 8, 2010, showing grounds for continuing the

appeal, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(a), 44.3. No response was filed, and on March 25, 2010, we dismissed the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Li v. Xiao, No. 02-10-00027-CV, 2010 WL 1137027,

at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 25, 2010, no pet.).

On March 30, 2010, the trial court signed the “Amended Temporary Orders”

at issue. Li filed a pro se notice of appeal on April 23, 2010, appealing from both the

January 28, 2010 “Temporary Orders” and the March 30, 2010 “Amended

Temporary Orders.” We again notified the parties of our concern that this court may

not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the “Temporary Orders” and the

“Amended Temporary Orders” did not appear to be appealable orders. We informed

the parties that unless Li or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the

court a response by May 24, 2010, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this

appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Id. Li filed a response on May

20, 2010, but she failed to show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Moreover, from the faces of the “Temporary Orders” and the “Amended

Temporary Orders,” the documents are interlocutory. See Lehmann v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also In re J.W.L., 291 S.W.3d 79, 83

2
(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, orig. proceeding) (“Temporary orders entered in family

law cases are not appealable.”); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex. App.—El

Paso 1997, no writ) (stating that an order that does not dispose of all parties and

issues in the case must be classified, for purposes of appeal, as an interlocutory

order). Without affirmative statutory authority to hear an interlocutory appeal, this

court is without jurisdiction. See, e.g., Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014

(Vernon 2008) (setting out interlocutory appeal exceptions); Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d at

124. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: June 24, 2010

3
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                   
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Ivex Packaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation, owns all of the
outstanding capital stock of IPC, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all
of the outstanding capital stock of the following:

      1.   Packaging Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      2.   Ivex Corporation, an Ontario corporation, which owns all of
           the outstanding capital stock of:

                  (i)  M & R Plastics Inc., a Quebec corporation which owns all
                       of the outstanding capital stock of:

                              (a)  M&R Plastics Canada, Inc., an Ontario 
                                   corporation
                              (b)  2528-5347 Quebec Inc., a Quebec corporation

      3.   Kama of Illinois Corporation, a Delaware corporation

      4.   Valley Express Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      5.   Ivex Paper Mill Corporation, a Delaware corporation

      6.   IPMC Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which owns
           all of the outstanding capital stock of:

                  (i)  IPMC, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      7.   Trio Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      8.   Ivex Holdings, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws
           of England and Wales, which owns all of the outstanding capital
           stock of:

                  (i)  Kama Europe Limited, a corporation
                       organized under the laws of England and Wales

      9.   CFI Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all
           of the outstanding capital stock of:

                  (i)  Plastofilm Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation
                  (ii) CFI Recycling, Inc., a Delaware corporation
                  (iii)Plastofilm Limited, a Northern Ireland corporation
§ 263.31 Scheduling and prehearing conferences. ( a ) *Scheduling conference.* Within 30 days of service of the notice or order commencing a proceeding, the ALJ will direct counsel for all parties to meet with the ALJ at a specified time and manner prior to the hearing for the purpose of scheduling the course and conduct of the proceeding. This meeting is called a “scheduling conference.” The schedule for the identification of potential witnesses, the time for and manner of discovery, and the exchange of any prehearing materials including witness lists, statements of issues, stipulations, exhibits, and any other materials may also be determined at the scheduling conference.
( b ) *Prehearing conferences.* The ALJ may, in addition to the scheduling conference, on the ALJ's own motion or at the request of any party, direct counsel for the parties to confer with the ALJ at a prehearing conference to address any or all of the following: ( 1 ) Simplification and clarification of the issues;
( 2 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact, and the contents, authenticity and admissibility into evidence of documents;
( 3 ) Matters of which official notice may be taken;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 5 ) Summary disposition of any or all issues;
( 6 ) Resolution of discovery issues or disputes;
( 7 ) Amendments to pleadings; and
( 8 ) Such other matters as may aid in the orderly disposition of the proceeding.
( c ) *Transcript.* The ALJ may require that a scheduling or prehearing conference be recorded by a court reporter. A transcript of the conference and any materials filed, including orders, becomes part of the record of the proceeding. A party may obtain a copy of the transcript at the party's expense.
( d ) *Scheduling or prehearing orders.* At or within a reasonable time following the conclusion of the scheduling conference or any prehearing conference, the ALJ will serve on each party an order setting forth any agreements reached and any procedural determinations made.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN R. MEREDITH,

 Appellant,

v.

MARILYN JEAN,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00204-CV

Appeal from

98th District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC # D-1-GN-15-004979)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the clerk’s record has not been filed due to the 

fault of the Appellant, John R. Meredith, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Unless otherwise excused, a non-indigent appellant must either pay for or make 

arrangements for the payment of the fees related to preparation of the appellate record to ensure 

that the record is timely filed. TEX.R.APP.P. 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3); see TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b), (c). 

The clerk’s record was due to be filed on September 26, 2016. The Bell County District Clerk 

notified the Court that the clerk’s record would not be filed because Appellant had not made 

financial arrangements to pay for the record. In accordance with Rule 37.3(b), the Clerk of the 

Court notified Appellant by letter regarding his failure to make financial arrangements to pay for 

the clerk’s record and advised Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of 
- 2 -

prosecution unless he responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. 

See TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not filed any written response or otherwise showed that 

grounds exist for the appeal to be continued. Pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and 42.3(b) and (c), we 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

January 4, 2017

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3073

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the conducting 

of certain games of chance shall not be treated as an unrelated trade 

or business. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2003

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. KLINE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, 

Mr. SABO, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, 

and Mr. OBERSTAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the conducting of certain games of chance shall 

not be treated as an unrelated trade or business.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDUCT OF CERTAIN GAMES OF CHANCE NOT 

4 TREATED AS UNRELATED TRADE OR BUSI5 NESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 513(f) 

7 (relating to certain bingo games) is amended to read as 

8 follows: 
2

HR 3073 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘unrelated trade 

2 or business’ does not include—

3 ‘‘(A) any trade or business which consists 

4 of conducting bingo games, and 

5 ‘‘(B) any trade or business which consists 

6 of conducting qualified games of chance if the 

7 net proceeds from such trade or business are 

8 paid or set aside for payments for purposes de9 scribed in section 170(c)(2)(B), for the pro10 motion of social welfare (within the meaning of 

11 section 501(c)(4)), or for a purpose for which 

12 State law specifically authorizes the expenditure 

13 of such proceeds.’’. 

14 (b) QUALIFIED GAMES OF CHANCE.—Subsection (f) 

15 of section 513 is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED GAMES OF CHANCE.—For pur18 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified game of 

19 chance’ means any game of change (other than 

20 bingo) conducted by the organization if—

21 ‘‘(A) such organization is licensed pursu22 ant to State law to conduct such game, 

23 ‘‘(B) only organizations which are orga24 nized as nonprofit corporations or are exempt 

25 from tax under section 501(a) may be so li-
3

HR 3073 IH 

1 censed to conduct such game within the State, 

2 and 

3 ‘‘(C) the conduct of such game does not 

4 violate State or local law.’’

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The subsection head6 ing of section 513(f) is amended by striking ‘‘BINGO

7 GAMES’’ and inserting ‘‘GAMES OF CHANCE’’.

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to games conducted after Decem10 ber 31, 2003.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      30,134,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               86,889,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   989,000
<INVENTORY>                                 43,350,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           165,736,000
<PP&E>                                     100,505,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,973,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             436,914,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      105,453,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 43,280,000
<COMMON>                                       297,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 179,242,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               436,914,000
<SALES>                                    283,353,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           283,353,000
<CGS>                                      255,579,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              255,579,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,032,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,166,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (32,667,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,165,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (29,502,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 166,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (29,336,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.24)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable Robert M. Summers, Secretary Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Secretary Summers: 

## DEC 1 92012

OnNovember 19, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Maryland
_ Department ofEnvironment on November 15, 2012. This SIP revision (#12-05) pertains to the removal ofthe Mount SaintMary's College 1979 Consent Order from the Maryland SIP. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a DirectFinal Rulemak:ing Notice (DFRN) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Maria Pirro, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2181. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
# C_2020218EN.01001301.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/13

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 3 March 2020 in the case of Abdulkerim Kerim v The Norwegian Government

(Case E-1/20)

(2020/C 218/08)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 3 March 2020 from Norges Høyesterett (the Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 3 March 2020, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Abdulkerim Kerim v The Norwegian Government on the following questions:

Which criteria should be the basis for determining whether one is faced with a marriage of convenience covered by the abuse rule in Article 35 of Directive 2004/38/EC? It would be useful if the EFTA Court could especially comment on the following:

| a) | Does the EEA citizen’s subjective intention for entering into the marriage have any significance for the determination of whether one is faced with a marriage of convenience? |
| --- | --- |

a)

Does the EEA citizen’s subjective intention for entering into the marriage have any significance for the determination of whether one is faced with a marriage of convenience?

| b) | If the third country national’s intention is the key factor for determining whether one is faced with a marriage of convenience within the meaning of the Directive, is it a requirement that the third country national’s wish for a right of residence was the sole purpose for entering into the marriage, or is it sufficient that it was the main purpose for entering into the marriage? |
| --- | --- |

b)

If the third country national’s intention is the key factor for determining whether one is faced with a marriage of convenience within the meaning of the Directive, is it a requirement that the third country national’s wish for a right of residence was the sole purpose for entering into the marriage, or is it sufficient that it was the main purpose for entering into the marriage?

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****Annual plan [electronic resource].
** 
2005 | 2006| 2007 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.18:
Item Number:0900-I-07 (online)
CGP System Number:000612990
 
 
 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
 
, 2017********
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00059-CV

JASHON PAGE AND MICHEAL PAGE,

Appellants

V.

CERBERUS SFR HOLDINGS, L.P.,

Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 

County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2018-008835-1)

August 29, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report
    of Acadia Realty Trust (the Company) on Form
  10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth F. Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/ Kenneth F. Bernstein              | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| |                                       | 
| | Kenneth F. Bernstein                  | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | February 27, 2009                     | 

---