alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013182EN.01001001.xml

| 27.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/10

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2013/C 182/12

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 12 December 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 71725 |
| Decision number | : | 480/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Liechtenstein |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Liechtenstein — Preferential tax treatment for revenues from software and scientific and technical databases |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) of the EEA |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Economic sectors | : | All sectors |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

12 December 2012

Case number

:

71725

Decision number

:

480/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Liechtenstein

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Liechtenstein — Preferential tax treatment for revenues from software and scientific and technical databases

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) of the EEA

Type of measure

:

No aid

Economic sectors

:

All sectors

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 308.31 Scheduling and prehearing conferences. ( a ) *Scheduling conference.* Within 30 days of service of the notice or order commencing a proceeding, the ALJ will direct counsel for all parties to meet with the ALJ at a specified time and manner prior to the hearing for the purpose of scheduling the course and conduct of the proceeding. This meeting is called a “scheduling conference.” The schedule for the identification of potential witnesses, the time for and manner of discovery, and the exchange of any prehearing materials including witness lists, statements of issues, stipulations, exhibits, and any other materials may also be determined at the scheduling conference.
( b ) *Prehearing conferences.* The ALJ may, in addition to the scheduling conference, on the ALJ's own motion or at the request of any party, direct counsel for the parties to confer with the ALJ at a prehearing conference to address any or all of the following: ( 1 ) Simplification and clarification of the issues;
( 2 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact, and the contents, authenticity and admissibility into evidence of documents;
( 3 ) Matters of which official notice may be taken;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 5 ) Summary disposition of any or all issues;
( 6 ) Resolution of discovery issues or disputes;
( 7 ) Amendments to pleadings; and
( 8 ) Such other matters as may aid in the orderly disposition of the proceeding.
( c ) *Transcript.* The ALJ may require that a scheduling or prehearing conference be recorded by a court reporter. A transcript of the conference and any materials filed, including orders, becomes part of the record of the proceeding. A party may obtain a copy of the transcript at the party's expense.
( d ) *Scheduling or prehearing orders.* At or within a reasonable time following the conclusion of the scheduling conference or any prehearing conference, the ALJ will serve on each party an order setting forth any agreements reached and any procedural determinations made.
# C_2019107EN.01001001.xml

| 21.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/10

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 19 November 2018 in the case of Fosen-Linjen AS, supported by Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon (NHO) v AtB AS

(Case E-7/18)

(2019/C 107/05)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 19 November 2018 from Norges Høyesterett (the Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 19 November 2018, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Fosen-Linjen AS, supported by Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon (NHO) v AtB AS on the following question:

Does Article 2(1)(c) of the Remedies Directive require that any breach of the rules governing public procurement in itself is sufficient for there to be a basis of liability for positive contract interest?

---
# C_2021396EN.01001101.xml

| 30.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/11

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 396/11)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.6.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86974 |
| Decision No | 130/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation of the COVID-19 Guarantee scheme |
| Legal basis | Forskrift om endring i forskrift 27. mars 2020 nr. 490 til lov om statlig garantiordning for lån til små og mellomstore bedrifter, FOR-2020-03-27-490 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended) |
| Duration | 1.7.2021 - 31.10.2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK, |
| The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency |
| Pb 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.6.2021

Case No

86974

Decision No

130/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation of the COVID-19 Guarantee scheme

Legal basis

Forskrift om endring i forskrift 27. mars 2020 nr. 490 til lov om statlig garantiordning for lån til små og mellomstore bedrifter, FOR-2020-03-27-490

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended)

Duration

1.7.2021 - 31.10.2021

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK,

The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency

Pb 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
DATE:1-3D-15

CHRISTOPHER A. PINE,CLERK

14TH COURT OF APPEALS

301 FANNIN St., Rm:245

HOUSTON,TX 77002

LEON HARRISON #815719

POLUNSKY UNIT

3872 FM 350 So.

LIVINGSTON, TX 77351

RE: LEON HARRISON V. STATE, No .14-13-00239-CR; TC:N

230TH DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

2TT—E0URT #

Dear Mr . Pine:

I uould like the status of my motion dated:11/17/14 for "Appellant's

Request Court En Banc To Reconsider Court's Denial Of Appellant's Motion

under Rule 60(b)(5).

At this time I have not received a white card on the out come of this

motion or it's filing date. Please send me a docket text of the filing

in this action.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely, . /

Appellant-pro se

CC: FILE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 25, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 25, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1061. IN RE: ESTATE OF SOLOMON BONNER, JR..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
§ 268.404 Appellate Procedure. ( a ) On behalf of the Commission, the Office of Federal Operations shall review the complaint file and all written statements and briefs from either party. The Commission may supplement the record by an exchange of letters or memoranda, investigation, remand to the Board or other procedures.
( b ) If the Office of Federal Operations requests information from one or both of the parties to supplement the record, each party providing information shall send a copy of the information to the other party.
( c ) When either party to an appeal fails without good cause shown to comply with the requirements of this section or to respond fully and in timely fashion to requests for information, the Office of Federal Operations shall, in appropriate circumstances: ( 1 ) Draw an adverse inference that the requested information would have reflected unfavorably on the party refusing to provide the requested information;
( 2 ) Consider the matters to which the requested information or testimony pertains to be established in favor of the opposing party;
( 3 ) Issue a decision fully or partially in favor of the opposing party; or
( 4 ) Take such other actions as appropriate.
1

January 30, 2012

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DE 20590

Subject: Petition for Exemption to Title 14 CFR Part 103, Subpart A, sec. 103.1(d) Unpowered, 

weighs less than 155 lbs.

To Whom It May Concern:

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. seeks relief from this Federal Aviation Regulation to 

operate a replica of the Wright Brothers 1911 glider. The original glider weighed 158 lbs. and 

was flown off the sand dunes at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina in 1911 for their investigations of 

the secrets of flight. The replica 1911 glider weighs 172 lbs. which is 17 lbs. over the maximum 

155 lbs of the requirement of Title 14 CFR part 103, subpart A. Sec. 103.1(d). The Wright 

brothers used a cotton muslin fabric on the original 1911 glider. Cotton muslin in this weight is 

no longer available. The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. has had to use modern cotton muslin 

that is stronger but heavier than the original fabric. The extra 17 pound weight of the 1911 

replica glider will not adversely affect the safety to the public.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. can and will operate this replica 1911 glider under all the 

rest of Title 14 CFR part 103, Ultralight vehicles, rules. All the personnel involved with the 

WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. are experienced in the aviation operations and maintenance 

fields. They know and practice the safety rules required by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. plans to continue the Wright Brothers investigation into the 

mystery of flight. The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. is equipping the 1911 replica with an 

electronic recorder to record the flight parameters such as altitude (which the glider would be in 

ground effect at all times), temperature, airspeed, control pressures, etc. The Wright brothers 

could not record this data on their original 1911 glider.

The Wright Experience, Inc

P.O. Box 3365

Warrenton, VA 20188

Phone: 540-347-1909

Fax: 540-349-1764

kenwhyde@aol.com

www.wrightexperience.com

Rediscovering the Secrets of the Wright Brothers to Inspire a New Generation
2

It is in the public interest to gather and record this information to show how far advanced the 

Wright brothers were in their knowledge of flight in their time. Flights will be conducted off the 

sand dunes of the Jockey’s Ridge State Park, North Carolina in the area the Wright brothers 

conducted their flights in 1911.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. has flown over 200 flights off these sand dunes in a 1902 

replica glider in 2002 and 2003 and these flights were conducted under Title 14, Part 103. The 

1902 glider weighed less than 155 lbs.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. believes it can operate this 1911 glider replica under Title 

14, CFR part 103, EXCEPT sec. 103.1(d) without reducing the SAFETY to the PUBLIC, and 

maintain a level of SAFETY required by Title 14 CFR, PART 103, and continue to add to the 

knowledge of the Wright Brothers experiments for future generations.

Sincerely,

Ken W. Hyde

President

The Wright Experience, Inc.
§ 308.512 Parties to the hearing. ( a ) The parties to the hearing will be the defendant and the Corporation.
( b ) Pursuant to the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(5)), a private plaintiff under the False Claims Act may participate in these proceedings to the extent authorized by the provisions of that Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2877 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2877

To provide for the revocation of certain exclusions from the safeguard 
measures imposed by the President on imports of certain steel products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2003

 Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Costello, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Mollohan, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Evans, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
Crane, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
    Sanders, Mr. LaHood, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Jackson of 
  Illinois, Mr. Emanuel, and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the revocation of certain exclusions from the safeguard 
measures imposed by the President on imports of certain steel products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVIEW AND REVOCATION OF CERTAIN EXCLUSIONS FROM SAFEGUARD 
              MEASURES ON CERTAIN STEEL PRODUCTS.

    The President shall take the necessary steps to--
            (1) review each exclusion of a product, granted before the 
        enactment of this Act, from the imposition of safeguard 
        measures imposed under Proclamation 7529 of March 5, 2002, on 
        imports of certain steel products;
            (2) revoke any exclusion described in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) to which an objection was submitted pursuant to 
                notice published by the Office of the United States 
                Trade Representative in the Federal Register, but not 
                within the time period prescribed in such notice; and
                    (B) that would have been denied if the objection 
                had been timely filed; and
            (3) revoke any exclusion described in paragraph (1) if the 
        person requesting the exclusion is found to have submitted any 
        materially false or misleading information, in connection with 
        the request, regarding the availability of a competing domestic 
        product.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Thomas Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James T. Taylor,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.    /s/  JAMES T.
TAYLOR James T. Taylor
Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary  March 30, 2006
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO U.S. TRUCKING STOCK OPTION PLAN

     Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended and restated to increase the number of
shares subject to the Plan and a new Section 4.11 is added to provide for stock
awards as follows:

3.1 Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.3
Adjustments in Authorized Shares, the total number of Shares for which Options
and Awards may be granted under the Plan may not exceed five million (5,000,000)
Shares. These Shares may be either authorized but unissued or reacquired Shares.

4.11 Stock Awards. The Committee shall have authority to grant common stock
awards for any or no consideration in addition to options for common stock.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER RECALLING MANDATE

Appellate case name: Johanna Dabbs v. Vincent Calderon

Appellate case number: 01-14-00598-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-76748

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

On May 20, 2016, mandate in the above-referenced cause issued. On May 25, 2016, 

Vincent Calderon filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, complaining of a clerical error in 

the judgment to enforce the judgment against Dabbs’s surety on her supersedeas bond and for 

any costs taxed against Dabbs. No response was filed. On July 28, 2016, the Court recalled its 

May 20, 2016 mandate, and on August 25, 2016, the Court issued a corrected judgment and 

mandate.

On September 22, 2016, Calderon filed an emergency motion for clarification of the 

August 25, 2016 mandate. Calderon contends that the mandate should state that Dabbs’s surety, 

Western Surety Company, is jointly and severally liable with Dabbs for the entire amount of the 

trial court’s judgment, rather than the face amount of the bond, $30,000. Western Surety filed a 

response in opposition to the motion, arguing that the Court should deny the motion or, 

alternatively, clarify the mandate to state that Western Surety is jointly and severally liable with 

Dabbs only for the amount of the bond.

After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that there was a clerical error in the 

August 25, 2016 judgment and mandate of the Court in this cause, specifically, that the Court did 

not state that Western Surety’s joint and several liability is limited to the amount of the bond.

The Court denies Calderon’s September 22, 2016 motion and orders the Clerk of this 

Court to recall the mandate issued in this case on August 25, 2016. It is further ordered that the 

Clerk of this Court instruct the clerk of the court below immediately to return the recalled 

mandate to the Clerk of this Court. Execution on this Court’s judgment may not commence until 

the Clerk of this Court issues a new mandate. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.7.

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 4, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on October 14, 2009, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

(1) Executive Committee Reports

The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: October 5, 2009.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9-24372 Filed 10-6-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
# C_2022198EN.01000101.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 198/01)

Last publication

OJ C 191, 10.5.2022

Past publications

OJ C 171, 25.4.2022

OJ C 165, 19.4.2022

OJ C 158, 11.4.2022

OJ C 148, 4.4.2022

OJ C 138, 28.3.2022

OJ C 128, 21.3.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
·~ 

·~ 

If ;. = 

FREE FLIGHT X 4 USERS MANUAL 

As the Freeflight x 4 is a custom built upper end multirotor it does not come with a manufactures flight 

manual. However the Freeflight x 4 utilizes an A2 flight controller (the same flight controller used in the 

DJI Phantom 2) and the same GPS components as the Phantom 2. The Freeflight x 4 will operate under 

th~ exact same parameters as the Phantom 2, fully autonomous flight, return to home, lost signal, 

vertical 

and horizontal speed, bank angle are all the same. This is by design for API for the purpose of similar 

flight between UAS's and the use of the same ground station and controls to help enhance familiarity 

and safety for its pilots. 

The Freeflight x 4 has the same flight characteristics and properties as more common UAS's like the DJI. 

Due to its larger size it can still operate at well under 55 lbs. and still have the weight capacity to carry 

commercial grade camera and survey equipment, (unlike the DJI Phantom 2) 

It is API's intention to use the DJI Phantom 2 user manual for both UAS's as they are the same from a 

control and characteristic standpoint. Included is the specific size and dimensions pages of the x 4. 

In addition for safety the Freeflight x 4 has been equipped with a DJI Ballistics parachute that is 

automatically deployed by the flight controller in the event of any electric failure, excessive pitch angle, 

or loss of communications. The parachute also can be fired manually by the PIC via. RC control in the 

event of complete power loss onboard the UAS. It has also been equipped with an FPV (first person 

view) camera that can be viewed by the PIC to get a cockpit view from the UAS. 

Page 19 February 18, 2015 
> ·-~ 

FRONT 

620.0 mm 

TOP 

' 

·-

·•~ 

Page 20 

340.0 mm 

SIDE 

300.0 mm 

Diagonal \oVheelbase : 800 mm 

Arm Length : 320 mm 

340.0 mm 

Center Frame Diameter: 240 mm 

Landing Gear Size : 

300 mm (Length) x 430 mm (Width) 

x 340 ml)l (Height) 

(Center Plate: 250 mm) 

February 18, 2015 
Size and Weight 

Motor 

f :ESC 

••• 

:prop ( 1555CW/1555~) 

:Flight Parameters 

•• 

,:;-:.~·-_:.·:~·-:..-:-_-:·=---~:"":".:;.::::~·:· - ·--

::Diagonal Wheelbase: aoomm 

. Arm Length: 320mm 

Single arm w·eight (including motor. esc. propeller): 330g 

' Center Frame Diameter: 240mm 

:Center frame weight (including landing gear): 1560g 

-Landing Gear Size: 300mrn (Length) x430mm {width) x340mm (height) 

_ :J~ente~ plat~~. (~50) _m.m) .. ·--.:: ... . "'"~ . .. ~ -

· .§ltatQL Size: 41 x14mm 

~: 400rpmN 

':Max Power: 500W 

:,weight 148g _ . -·· __ . ' 

Current 40A 

Voltage: 6S UPo 

Signal Frequency: 30Hz- 450Hz 

,'Drive PWM Frequency: 8KHz 

.. _Weig~t: ~2g . . - ··Material: Carbon Fiber 

:size: 15x5 .5inch 

... weight 40g 

Take Off Weight: 4Kg- BKg 

·Weight of Machine: 3. 7Kg 

• Battery: UPo ( 6S, 1 oooomA.h-20000m.A.h minimum 15C) 

Max Power Consumption: 1508W 

:Hover Consumption: 754W (@Take off weight: 4.3Kg) 

Op_erational Temperature: -_10 "C- +40 "C 

Page 21 February 18, 2015