alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023040EN.01000301.xml

| 2.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/3

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2023/C 40/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21 September 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 89149 |
| Decision No | 180/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | Important Project of Common European Interest on Hydrogen Industry (Hy2Use) – Norwegian projects |
| Legal basis | Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | Individual aid (ad hoc) |
| Objective | Aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | For Barents Blue Ammonia Plant: NOK 482 million
  For TiZir Titanium and Iron AS: NOK 261 million |
| Intensity | For Barents Blue Ammonia Plant: 29,6 %
  For TiZir Titanium and Iron AS: 60 % |
| Duration | Grants disbursed in 2022-2026 |
| Economic sectors | Ammonia sector
  Metals sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Enova SF |
| Brattørkaia 17A, 7010 Trondheim, |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

21 September 2022

Case No

89149

Decision No

180/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

Important Project of Common European Interest on Hydrogen Industry (Hy2Use) – Norwegian projects

Legal basis

Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

Individual aid (ad hoc)

Objective

Aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

For Barents Blue Ammonia Plant: NOK 482 million

For TiZir Titanium and Iron AS: NOK 261 million

Intensity

For Barents Blue Ammonia Plant: 29,6 %

For TiZir Titanium and Iron AS: 60 %

Duration

Grants disbursed in 2022-2026

Economic sectors

Ammonia sector

Metals sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Enova SF

Brattørkaia 17A, 7010 Trondheim,

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B., Louisville, KY; Notice of Appointment 
of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B., Louisville, 
Kentucky (OTS No. 16835), on September 18, 2009.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-24285 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3011 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, as the ``Bob Hope Post 
                           Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, as the ``Bob Hope Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 135 
East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Bob Hope Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bob Hope Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Jeanne Renoux, Respondent, *v.*Hippolyte A. Geney, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

G. L. Terry, for appellant.

L H. Harris, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This is an action for conversion, and on the cross-examination of Harris, a witness for the plaintiff, he was asked as to an assignment alleged to have been made to his wife respect*703ing a part of the fund in controversy. On objection the question was excluded. This was manifest error. It was certainly proper to show the interest, if any, that the witness had in the matter in suit as affecting his credibility.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
§ 229.20 Relation to state law. ( a ) *In general.* Any provision of a law or regulation of any state in effect on or before September 1, 1989, that requires funds deposited in an account at a bank chartered by the state to be made available for withdrawal in a shorter time than the time provided in subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A, shall— ( 1 ) Supersede the provisions of the EFA Act and subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A, to the extent the provisions relate to the time by which funds deposited or received for deposit in an account are available for withdrawal; and
( 2 ) Apply to all federally insured banks located within the state. No amendment to a state law or regulation governing the availability of funds that becomes effective after September 1, 1989, shall supersede the EFA Act and subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A, but unamended provisions of state law shall remain in effect.
( b ) *Preemption of inconsistent law.* Except as provided in paragraph (a), the EFA Act and subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A, supersede any provision of inconsistent state law.
( c ) *Standards for preemption.* A provision of a state law in effect on or before September 2, 1989, is not inconsistent with the EFA Act, or subpart B, or in connection therewith, subpart A, if it requires that funds shall be available in a shorter period of time than the time provided in this subpart. Inconsistency with the EFA Act and subpart B, and in connection therewith, subpart A, may exist when state law— ( 1 ) Permits a depositary bank to make funds deposited in an account by cash, electronic payment, or check available for withdrawal in a longer period of time than the maximum period of time permitted under subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A; or
( 2 ) Provides for disclosures or notices concerning funds availability relating to accounts.
( d ) *Preemption determinations.* The Board may determine, upon the request of any state, bank, or other interested party, whether the EFA Act and subpart B, and, in connection therewith, subpart A, preempt provisions of state laws relating to the availability of funds.
( e ) *Procedures for preemption determinations.* A request for a preemption determination shall include the following— ( 1 ) A copy of the full text of the state law in question, including any implementing regulations or judicial interpretations of that law; and
( 2 ) A comparison of the provisions of state law with the corresponding provisions in the EFA Act and subparts A and B of this part, together with a discussion of the reasons why specific provisions of state law are either consistent or inconsistent with corresponding sections of the EFA Act and subparts A and B of this part.
A request for a preemption determination shall be addressed to the Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. [53 FR 19433, May 27, 1988, as amended at 69 FR 47311, Aug. 4, 2004]
# C_2018414EN.01001201.xml

| 15.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 7 June 2018

in Case E-17/17

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/54/EU)

(2018/C 414/14)

In Case E-17/17, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 8 of Annex V to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers) as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed or, in any event, by failing to inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 7 June 2018, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 8 of Annex V to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 8 of Annex V to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, November 10, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. 
For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-24097 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Buckeye. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated this 21st  day of  January 2011 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      |   |
|                                                      |   |
| /s/ Steven G. Dean                                        |   |
| Steven G. Dean                                            |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer         |   |
1 From:

Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 2:33 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Re: The fuel that was released

Importance: High

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

How has our water been affected from the time the fuel released was discovered. Has there been any changes or has

the water remained the same prior to the discovery?

Please repond!

Thank you,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0332 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID ANDREW BOUCHER, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 17 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 12 2023

10/12/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0332
JURY TRIAL.

[Cuyahoga Circuit Court,

January Term, 1893.]

Baldwin, Caldwell aud Hale, JJ.

#### †Clementia Whitworth v. Peter Steers.

Triad by Jury Waived by Conduct.

The right of trial by jury may be waived in open court by conduct of the party amounting to an estoppel.

This judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court without report, Dec. 17, 1895 ; 53 O S 686.

Hade, J.

This case is pending here upon a petition in error to reverse a judgment of the court of common pleas. A single error is relied upon. The plaintiff below, the plaintiff here, commenced an action in the court of common pleas in which he sought to establish his title to the premises described in the petition, and to have the possession of the premises restored to him, with an accounting for rents and profits on the part of the defendant who was in possession, as he alleged.

*557
      *E. Sowers,*for plaintiff.

*James Wade,*for defendant.

The case was tried in the court oí common pleas to the court, without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in judgment for the defendant. Thereupon the plaintiff took an appeal to the circuit court, which appeal, on motion, was ■dismissed, on the ground that the case was one for a jury and not appealable; .and after that was done the plaintiff in error filed his petition in error in this court, alleging that the court below erred in the trial of his case without a jury. The plaintiff relies upon section 5204 of the statute:

“In actions arising upon contract the trial by the jury may be waived by the parties, and in other actions with the assent of the court, in the following manner:

> “1. By the consent of the party appearing, when the other party fails to appear at the trial, by himself or attorney.

> “2. By written consent in person, or by attorney, filed with the clerk.

> “3. By oral consent in open court, entered on the journal.”

There was no written consent filed with the clerk and there was no oral consent entered on the journal.

This court holds, notwithstanding this statute, which is quite explicit, that the right to trial by jury may be waived by the conduct of the party, amounting to a •waiver by estoppel, and that the conduct of the plaintiff in this case amounts to such waiver; that having brought the action and invoking the power of the court to try it, without the intervention of a jury, taking his chances for judgment at the hands of the court, and taking an appeal from that judgment to this court, at is too late for him to predicate-error upon the fact that the court fried his case without intervention of a jury, doing precisely what he asked the court to do. The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11.1

                              DIALOGIC CORPORATION
                      CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                    Twelve months ended
                                                       December 31,

                                              1997         1996           1995

Basic Earnings
Income applicable to shares used in
     calculation of net income per share  $   21,752    $  25,548    $  16,302
                                           =========     ========      =======
Shares used in calculation of net income 
      per share:
Weighted   average  shares  outstanding       15,931       15,654       15,340
                                             =======       ======       ======
Net  income  per share                    $     1.37    $    1.63    $    1.06
                                           =========     ========     ========
Diluted Earnings
Income applicable to shares used in
   calculation or net income per share    $   21,752    $  25,548    $  16,302
                                           =========     ========     ========
Shares used in calculation of net income
    per share:
Weighted  average shares outstanding          15,931       15,654       15,340
Dilutive effect of stock options after 
     application of treasury
     stock method                                667          763          699
                                             -------       ------       ------
Number of shares in calculation of net 
     income per share                         16,598       16,417       16,039
                                             =======       ======       ======
Net income per share                      $     1.31    $    1.56     $   1.02
                                           =========     ========      ========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,059
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                       412
<INVENTORY>                                     51,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,011
<PP&E>                                          24,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,067
<SALES>                                        131,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,181
<CGS>                                           84,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                       497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>