alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. (Eastern Time), October 19, 2009.

# Place:

2nd Floor Training Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

## Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the September 24, 2009 Board member meeting.

2. Approval of the Minutes of the April 22, 2009 ETAC meeting.

3. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

a. Participant Activity Report.

b. Quarterly Investment Policy Report.

4. Mid-Year Financial Audit Report.

5. Quarterly Vendor Financial Report.

6. Legislative Report.

a. Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act Review;

b. Report on Making Retirement Contributions from Unused Leave.

7. Web site Demonstration.

8. TSP Modernization Update.

## Parts Closed to the Public

9. Proprietary Information.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: October 8, 2009.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. E9-24737 Filed 10-9-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-20780

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mike Piedra, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-437-3

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Mike Piedra has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Piedra has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 1, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-20780 Document: 00515922333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2021
No. 19-20780

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-20780 Document: 00515922333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/01/2021
§ 309.7 Service of process. ( a ) *Service.* Any subpoena or other legal process to obtain information maintained by the FDIC shall be duly issued by a court having jurisdiction over the FDIC, and served upon either the Executive Secretary (or designee), FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429, or the Regional Director or Regional Manager of the FDIC region where the legal action from which the subpoena or process was issued is pending. A list of the FDIC's regional offices is available from the Office of Public Affairs, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429 (telephone 202-898-6996). Where the FDIC is named as a party, service of process shall be made pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and upon the Executive Secretary (or designee), FDIC, 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429, or upon the agent designated to receive service of process in the state, territory, or jurisdiction in which any insured depository institution is located. Identification of the designated agent in the state, territory, or jurisdiction may be obtained from the Executive Secretary or from the Office of the General Counsel, FDIC, 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429. The Executive Secretary (or designee), Regional Director or designated agent shall immediately forward any subpoena, court order or legal process to the General Counsel. The Corporation may require the payment of fees, in accordance with the fee schedule referred to in § 309.5(c)(3), prior to the release of any records requested pursuant to any subpoena or other legal process.
( b ) *Notification by person served.* If any current or former officer, director, employee or agent of the Corporation, or any other person who has custody of records belonging to the FDIC, is served with a subpoena, court order, or other process requiring that person's attendance as a witness concerning any matter related to official duties, or the production of any exempt record of the Corporation, such person shall promptly advise the General Counsel of such service, of the testimony and records described in the subpoena, and of all relevant facts which may be of assistance to the General Counsel in determining whether the individual in question should be authorized to testify or the records should be produced. Such person should also inform the court or tribunal which issued the process and the attorney for the party upon whose application the process was issued, if known, of the substance of this section.
( c ) *Appearance by person served.* Absent the written authorization of the Corporation's General Counsel, or designee, to disclose the requested information, any current or former officer, director, employee, or agent of the Corporation, and any other person having custody of records of the Corporation, who is required to respond to a subpoena or other legal process, shall attend at the time and place therein specified and respectfully decline to produce any such record or give any testimony with respect thereto, basing such refusal on this section.
[60 FR 61465, Nov. 30, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 71071, Nov. 29, 2002]
#### § 303.228 How to file an application.

Forms and instructions should be obtained from the FDIC's website (*www.fdic.gov*), and the application must be filed with the appropriate FDIC Regional Director. The application must be filed by an IDI on behalf of a person (bank-sponsored) unless the FDIC grants a waiver of that requirement (individual waiver). Individual waivers will be considered on a case-by-case basis where substantial good cause for granting a waiver is shown. A person may request an individual waiver and file an application on her or his own behalf within the same application. The appropriate Regional Office for a bank-sponsored application is the office covering the state where the IDI's home office is located. The appropriate Regional Office for an individual filing for a waiver of the institution filing requirement is the office covering the state where the person resides. States covered by each FDIC Regional Office can be located on the FDIC's website.
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1076

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

Luis Herrera-Gonzalez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 20, 2003

 Filed: June 27, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Luis Herrera-Gonzalez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute five hundred

grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine. The District

Court1

 sentenced him to 120 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised

release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was too long. 
-2-

We reject this argument. The drug quantity involved in the offense to which

Herrera-Gonzalez pleaded guilty subjected him to a minimum of ten years in prison,

see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (2000), and that was the term imposed. See United

States v. Vong, 171 F.3d 648, 654 (8th Cir. 1999) (explaining that by pleading guilty,

defendant admitted all factual allegations made in indictment); cf. United States v.

Chacon, No. 02-3008, 2003 WL 21295098, at *1 (8th Cir. June 6, 2003) (holding that

district court properly granted government’s motion to correct sentence where court

originally sentenced defendant below statutory minimum and only avenues for

departure were not open to defendant). 

Upon reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 222.32 Sharing medical information with affiliates. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System (other than national banks) and their respective operating subsidiaries, branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than Federal branches, Federal Agencies, and insured State branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.,* and 611 *et seq.*).
( b ) *In general.* The exclusions from the term “consumer report” in section 603(d)(2) of the Act that allow the sharing of information with affiliates do not apply to a person described in paragraph (a) of this section if that person communicates to an affiliate: ( 1 ) Medical information;
( 2 ) An individualized list or description based on the payment transactions of the consumer for medical products or services; or
( 3 ) An aggregate list of identified consumers based on payment transactions for medical products or services.
( c ) *Exceptions.* A person described in paragraph (a) of this section may rely on the exclusions from the term “consumer report” in section 603(d)(2) of the Act to communicate the information in paragraph (b) of this section to an affiliate: ( 1 ) In connection with the business of insurance or annuities (including the activities described in section 18B of the model Privacy of Consumer Financial and Health Information Regulation issued by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, as in effect on January 1, 2003);
( 2 ) For any purpose permitted without authorization under the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA);
( 3 ) For any purpose referred to in section 1179 of HIPAA;
( 4 ) For any purpose described in section 502(e) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act;
( 5 ) In connection with a determination of the consumer's eligibility, or continued eligibility, for credit consistent with § 222.30 of this part; or
( 6 ) As otherwise permitted by order of the Board.
# C_2018130EN.01000401.xml

| 12.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/4

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

of 22 December 2017

in Case E-1/17

Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Absolute bar to proceeding with a case — State aid — Decision to close formal investigation procedure)

(Absolute bar to proceeding with a case — State aid — Decision to close formal investigation procedure)

(2018/C 130/04)

In Case E-1/17, Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION under the second paragraph of Article 36 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice for the annulment of EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 179/15/COL of 7 May 2015 closing a formal investigation concerning State aid granted to Nettbuss Sør AS, which was published in EEA Supplement no. 59/1 to the Official Journal on 27 October 2016, the Court, composed of, Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave order of 22 December 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Konkurrenten.no AS is to bear its own costs, and the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the County of Aust-Agder and Nettbuss AS. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Konkurrenten.no AS is to bear its own costs, and the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the County of Aust-Agder and Nettbuss AS.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Norway bears its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Norway bears its own costs.

---
§ 313.30 Requests for offset from other federal agencies. Any federal agency may request that funds due and payable to its debtor by the FDIC be administratively offset by the FDIC in order to collect a debt owed to such agency by the debtor. The FDIC shall initiate the requested offset only upon: ( a ) Receipt of written certification from the creditor agency stating: ( 1 ) That the debtor owes the debt;
( 2 ) The amount and basis of the debt; and
( 3 ) That the agency has complied with its own administrative offset regulations and with the applicable provisions of 31 CFR 901.3, including providing any required hearing or review.
( b ) A determination by the creditor agency that collection by offset against funds payable by the FDIC would be in the best interest of the United States and that such offset would not otherwise be contrary to law.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis(the “Company”), hereby certifies that theCompany’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for theannual period ended December 31, 2005 (the“Report”), which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. By:     /s/ JEFFREY H. SCHWARTZ           Name: Jeffrey H. Schwartz Title:    Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 14, 2006
# C_2010047EN.01002301.xml

| 25.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/23

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 47/08

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 7 October 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 55120 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged aid being granted in connection with the sale of shares in the company Youngstorget 2 AS |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Economic sectors | : | Management of commercial property |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Municipality of Oslo |
| Rådhuset |
| 0037 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

7 October 2009

Case number

:

55120

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged aid being granted in connection with the sale of shares in the company Youngstorget 2 AS

Type of measure

:

No aid

Economic sectors

:

Management of commercial property

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Municipality of Oslo

Rådhuset

0037 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### ELROD V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 13, 1913.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Frank Oahalan.

.Julius Davidson, for appellant. R. C. Brickell,Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J. —

No bill of exceptions and no error bathe record. Affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAcceleration display system for aircraft zero-gravity researchThe features, design, calibration, and testing of Lewis Research Center's acceleration display system for aircraft zero-gravity research are described. Specific circuit schematics and system specifications are included as well as representative data traces from flown trajectories. Other observations learned from developing and using this system are mentioned where appropriate. The system, now a permanent part of the Lewis Learjet zero-gravity program, provides legible, concise, and necessary guidance information enabling pilots to routinely fly accurate zero-gravity trajectories. Regular use of this system resulted in improvements of the Learjet zero-gravity flight techniques, including a technique to minimize later accelerations. Lewis Gates Learjet trajectory data show that accelerations can be reliably sustained within 0.01 g for 5 consecutive seconds, within 0.02 g for 7 consecutive seconds, and within 0.04 g for up to 20 second. Lewis followed the past practices of acceleration measurement, yet focussed on the acceleration displays. Refinements based on flight experience included evolving the ranges, resolutions, and frequency responses to fit the pilot and the Learjet responses.Document ID19870009368Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMillis, Marc G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1987Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87358E-3117NASA-TM-87358Accession Number87N18801Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 674-22-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009368.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
42394.

#### ALEXANDER v. DANIEL et al.

Frankum, Judge.

The petition in this case, construed most strongly against the pleader, showed that the plaintiff was merely a tenant at will of the defendants named in the petition, and that he sought to recover from the defendants the value of a building erected by him on the premises in question which, together with the building, had been condemned by the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta while the plaintiff was in possession thereof. Since his petition showed that he was occupying the premises at the time the condemnation proceeding was instituted and that his tenancy was terminated by reason thereof, it will be presumed, in the absence of an allegation to the contrary, that plaintiff had notice of the institution of that proceeding and, that being so, he would have had to assert any claim he had for damages on account of the termination of his tenancy in that proceeding. *Mitchell v. State Hwy. Dept.,*216 Ga. 517, 518 (1) (118 SE2d 88, 93 ALR2d 459). For these reasons the general demurrer to the petition was properly sustained.

*168
      *Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*

Argued November 8, 1966

Decided January 20, 1967

Rehearing denied February 8, 1967

*E. E. Moore, Jr., J. C. Daugherty,*for appellant.

*Nolan B. Harmon, Stephens Mitchell, Lee Evans,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 5, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Robert J. Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     

|/s/Robert J. Higgins                 |  |  | /s/John J. Sullivan          | 
|------------------------------------ |  |  | ---------------------------- | 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  | Executive Vice President and | 
|                                     |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      | 
|                                    
|June 14, 2007                        |  |  | June 14, 2007                | 

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned in the capacity indicated hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
April 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Carter's, Inc. and The William Carter Company.

|Date: April 30, 2004 | /s/FREDERICK J. ROWAN, IIFrederick J. Rowan, II Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2004 | /s/MICHAEL D. CASEYMichael D. Casey Chief Financial Officer            

27

---



QuickLinks