alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      25,747,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,759,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (646,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 3,039,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,591,000
<PP&E>                                      150,856,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (23,096,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              167,665,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,250,000
<BONDS>                                     100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                167,665,000
<SALES>                                     177,036,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            164,409,000
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               141,128,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (505,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,918,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,868,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                4,428,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         8,440,000
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                8,440,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                               1.63


</TABLE>
# C_2021352EN.01000601.xml

| 2.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 352/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26 May 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86853 |
| Decision No | 070/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Reinsurance scheme for package travel guarantees |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary Decision authorising the main conditions of the measure |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Providing access to (affordable) package travel guarantees for package travel organisers |
| Form of aid | Guarantees |
| Budget | NOK 525 million |
| Intensity | The scheme covers 50 % of the losses that can be incurred by insurers under guarantees provided to package travel organisers. |
| Duration | 26.5.2021 – 31.12.2021 |
| Economic sectors | Package travel sector (potential indirect aid to banks and insurance companies providing package travel guarantees) |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Garantiinstituttet for eksportkreditt - GIEK |
| Postboks 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

26 May 2021

Case No

86853

Decision No

070/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Reinsurance scheme for package travel guarantees

Legal basis

Parliamentary Decision authorising the main conditions of the measure

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Providing access to (affordable) package travel guarantees for package travel organisers

Form of aid

Guarantees

Budget

NOK 525 million

Intensity

The scheme covers 50 % of the losses that can be incurred by insurers under guarantees provided to package travel organisers.

Duration

26.5.2021 – 31.12.2021

Economic sectors

Package travel sector (potential indirect aid to banks and insurance companies providing package travel guarantees)

Name and address of the granting authority

Garantiinstituttet for eksportkreditt - GIEK

Postboks 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 23, 2009, 8 a.m. to 
October 23, 2009, 12 p.m., InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco, 
One Nob Hill, 999 California Street, San Francisco, CA, 94108 which was 
published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2009, 74 FR 48979.
    The meeting was cancelled due to administration problems.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-24278 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
BOND OF ASSIGNEE.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

January Term, 1894.]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### James Yeaman v. John G. Payne et al.

-v’hen Wrongful Act of Assignee Does Not Make Sureties Liable.

An assignee forcibly taking a stock of goods of a third person, claiming it to lie tile debtor’s property, does not make his sureties liable.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county.

Scribner, J.

The court of common pleas sustained a demurrer to the petition of Yeaman in this case, and dismissed his petition at his costs. He prosecutes error to reverse the judgment.

The petition alleges, in substance, that in 1879, one Peter Scott made a' general assignment for the benefit of his creditors to James Montgomery, who accepted the said trust, qualified, and gave bond according to law, with the defendants, other than Meinhardt, as his sureties; that the plaintiff and Meinhardt at that time had two stocks of goods in Toledo which they owned and possessed, and that Montgomery, as such assignee, claiming the same as the goods of Peter Scott, assigned to him, forcibly took possession of the same, and converted the same to his own use as such assignee. The plaintiff and Meinhardt commenced an action against said Montgomery, as such assignee, for the said wrongful taking and conversion of their said goods, and obtained a judgment against him as such assignee for $7,784.62, .vhich judgment the said Montgomery afterwards paid in part, but that a balance of $3,500, and interest, is still due and unpaid; that Montgomery is dead, and no administrator has ever been appointed of his estate, and that he left no assets.

*3The petition further avers that said acts of Montgomery constituted a breach of his bond as such assignee.

A copy of the bond was attached to the petition, and is in the usual form required by the statute in such cases. Its condition is: “Now, therefore, if the said James Montgomery shall administer said trust in accordance with the provisions of an act of the general assembly of the state of Ohio, entitled ‘an act regulating the mode of administering assignments for the benefit of creditors,’ passed April 6, 1859, and the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto; and shall faithfully perform all his duties as such assignee, according to law, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue in law.”

Held, by the circuit court, affirming the common pleas, that said alleged act did not constitute a breach of the conditions of said bond, and the said sureties, thereon are not liable to the plaintiff.
# C_2022210EN.01003201.xml

| 25.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/32

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Trygderetten dated 26 January 2022 in the case of A v Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet

(Case E-2/22)

(2022/C 210/13)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 26 January 2022 from Trygderetten (The National Insurance Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 27 January 2022, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of A v Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet on the following questions:

| 1) | Does a benefit such as the transitional benefit (overgangsstønad) – see the first paragraph of Section 15-5 of the National Insurance Act, read in conjunction with the first sentence of the second paragraph – come within the material scope of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) according to:






  a. | Article 3(1), in particular (j), or |
| --- | --- | --- |

1)

Does a benefit such as the transitional benefit (overgangsstønad) – see the first paragraph of Section 15-5 of the National Insurance Act, read in conjunction with the first sentence of the second paragraph – come within the material scope of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) according to:

a.

Article 3(1), in particular (j), or

| b. | Article 3(3), read in conjunction with Article 70? |
| --- | --- |

b.

Article 3(3), read in conjunction with Article 70?

| 2) | Is it of any significance for the assessment under question 1) that there is a requirement of occupational activity for continued entitlement to a benefit when the youngest child becomes one year old, see Section 15-6 of the National Insurance Act? |
| --- | --- |

2)

Is it of any significance for the assessment under question 1) that there is a requirement of occupational activity for continued entitlement to a benefit when the youngest child becomes one year old, see Section 15-6 of the National Insurance Act?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

---
§ 308.135 Grounds for imposition of sanctions. ( a ) *Action under section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act.* The Board of Directors or its designee may issue and have served upon any municipal securities dealer for which the FDIC is the appropriate regulatory agency, or any person associated or seeking to become associated with a municipal securities dealer for which the FDIC is the appropriate regulatory agency, a written notice of its intention to censure, limit the activities or functions or operations of, suspend, or revoke the registration of, such municipal securities dealer, or to censure, suspend, or bar the person from being associated with the municipal securities dealer, when the Board of Directors or its designee determines: ( 1 ) That such municipal securities dealer or such person ( i ) Has committed any prohibited act or omitted any required act specified in subparagraph (A), (D), or (E) of section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78o);
( ii ) Has been convicted of any offense specified in section 15(b)(4)(B) of the Exchange Act within ten years of commencement of proceedings under this subpart; or
( iii ) Is enjoined from any act, conduct, or practice specified in section 15(b)(4)(C) of the Exchange Act; and
( 2 ) That it is in the public interest to impose any of the sanctions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) *Action under sections 17 and 17A of the Exchange Act.* The Board of Directors or its designee may issue, and have served upon any transfer agent or clearing agency for which the FDIC is the appropriate regulatory agency, a written Notice of its intention to deny registration to, censure, place limitations on the activities or function or operations of, suspend, or revoke the registration of, the transfer agent or clearing agency, when the Board of Directors or its designee determines: ( 1 ) That the transfer agent or clearing agency has willfully violated, or is unable to comply with, any applicable provision of section 17 or 17A of the Exchange Act, as amended, or any applicable rule or regulation issued pursuant thereto; and
( 2 ) That it is in the public interest to impose any of the sanctions set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XV Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  June  30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
86-A, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
86-A,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 10, 2004



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 10, 2004
# C_2014227EN.01001001.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/10

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2014/C 227/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 24 April 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74432 |
| Decision No | : | 171/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Liechtenstein |
| Region | : | Balzers |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Bürgergenossenschaft Balzers (Citizens’ Cooperative Balzers) |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Support to district heating production and infrastructure |
| Objective | : | Environmental aid |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | CHF 2 546 143 |
| Intensity | : | Production: 25 % Infrastructure: 75 % |
| Economic sectors | : | Energy production and distribution |
| Name and address of the responsible authority | : | EEA Coordination Unit |
| Europark/Austrasse 79 |
| FL-9490 Vaduz |
| LIECHTENSTEIN |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

24 April 2014

Case number

Case number

:

74432

Decision No

Decision No

:

171/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Liechtenstein

Region

Region

:

Balzers

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Bürgergenossenschaft Balzers (Citizens’ Cooperative Balzers)

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Support to district heating production and infrastructure

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental aid

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

Budget

:

CHF 2 546 143

Intensity

Intensity

:

Production: 25 % Infrastructure: 75 %

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Energy production and distribution

Name and address of the responsible authority

Name and address of the responsible authority

:

EEA Coordination Unit

Europark/Austrasse 79

FL-9490 Vaduz

LIECHTENSTEIN

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2015183EN.01000601.xml

| 4.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 10 November 2014

in Case E-9/14

Otto Kaufmann AG

(Admissibility — Exchange of information on convictions of legal persons — Freedom to provide services — Freedom of establishment — Directive 2004/18/EC — Directive 2006/123/EC)

(2015/C 183/07)

In Case E-9/14, Otto Kaufmann AG – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Princely Court of Liechtenstein (Fürstliches Landgericht des Fürstentums Liechtenstein) on the interpretation of EEA law with regard to the recording of criminal convictions of legal persons, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 10 November 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:

Fürstliches Landgericht des Fürstentums Liechtenstein

Articles 31 and 36 of the EEA Agreement do not require that a criminal conviction of a legal person be clearly recorded. Provisions such as Article 45 of Directive 2004/18/EC and Article 33 of Directive 2006/123/EC may require an EEA State to provide information, upon request from another EEA State, on convictions relevant to the competence and professional reliability of legal persons. However, these Directives leave the maintenance and handling of relevant information to national law.

---
# C_2021451EN.01000501.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 November 2021

(2021/C 451/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1519 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4376 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85545 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9033 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0559 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8878 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,275 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6037 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9496 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,1858 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5594 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9670 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6242 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5581 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 366,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5039 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3756 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5218 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 504,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7919 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,949 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,0294 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,341 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4193 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,6152 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,5415 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1519

JPY

Japanese yen

130,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4376

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85545

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9033

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0559

ISK

Iceland króna

150,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8878

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,275

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6037

RON

Romanian leu

4,9496

TRY

Turkish lira

11,1858

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5594

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9670

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6242

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5581

KRW

South Korean won

1 366,75

ZAR

South African rand

17,5039

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3756

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5218

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 504,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7919

PHP

Philippine peso

57,949

RUB

Russian rouble

82,0294

THB

Thai baht

38,341

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4193

MXN

Mexican peso

23,6152

INR

Indian rupee

85,5415

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 192.560 Limitations on charitable contributions.

A savings association may contribute a reasonable amount of conversion shares or proceeds to a charitable organization if such contribution will not exceed limits for charitable deductions under the Internal Revenue Code and the appropriate Federal banking agency does not object on supervisory grounds. If the savings association is well-capitalized, the appropriate Federal banking agency generally will not object if the savings association contributes an aggregate amount of eight percent or less of the conversion shares or proceeds.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6785]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Raphael: The Woman with the Veil,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Portland Art Museum, Portland, OR, from on or about October 23, 2009, until on or about January 3, 2010; at the Nevada Museum of Art, Reno, NV, from on or about January 8, 2010, until on or about March 21, 2010; at the Milwaukee Art Museum, Milwaukee, WI, from on or about March 26, 2010, until on or about June 6, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Maura M. Pally,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-24692 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P