52808 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices 

II. Authority 

EPA is initiating its review of DDVP 

pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural 

Regulations for Registration Review at 

40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) 

of FIFRA provides, among other things, 

that the registrations of pesticides are to 

be reviewed every 15 years. Under 

FIFRA section 3(a), a pesticide product 

may be registered or remain registered 

only if it meets the statutory standard 

for registration given in FIFRA section 

3(c)(5). When used in accordance with 

widespread and commonly recognized 

practice, the pesticide product must 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment; that is, without any 

unreasonable risk to man or the 

environment, or a human dietary risk 

from residues that result from the use of 

a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What Action is the Agency Taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the DDVP pesticide 

registration to assure that it continues to 

satisfy the FIFRA standard for 

registration—that is, it can still be used 

without unreasonable adverse effects on 

human health or the environment. 

DDVP’s registration review began on 

June 24, 2009, when the Agency opened 

the DDVP registration review docket for 

public review and comment. At present, 

EPA is opening an additional 30–day 

comment period for the DDVP 

registration review docket. 

B. Docket Content 

1. Review dockets. The registration 

review dockets contain information that 

the Agency may consider in the course 

of the registration review. On June 24, 

2009, the DDVP registration review 

docket contained a document 

summarizing what the Agency currently 

knows about DDVP and a preliminary 

work plan for anticipated data and 

assessment needs. However, the docket 

was missing supporting documents, 

which provide more detailed 

information on what the Agency knows 

about DDVP’s environmental fate, 

ecological effects, human health effects, 

use, and usage. Therefore, the Agency is 

opening an additional public comment 

for 30 days so the public can review and 

comment on the following documents 

now available in the DDVP registration 

review docket: 

• Registration Review – Preliminary 

Problem Formulation for the Ecological 

Risk Assessment of Dichlorvos (DDVP), 

May 14, 2009. 

• Dichlorvos (DDVP). Human Health 

Assessment Scoping Document in 

Support of Registration Review, May 6, 

2009. 

• Appendix A: Food/Feed and NonFood/Non-Feed Uses Considered for 

Registration Review, May 23, 2008. 

• DDVP (084001) California 

Department of Agriculture Usage Data, 

November 7, 2008. 

During this public comment period, 

the Agency is asking that interested 

persons identify any additional 

information they believe the Agency 

should consider during the registration 

review of DDVP. In the DDVP summary 

document, the Agency has identified the 

areas where public comment is 

specifically requested, though comment 

in any area is welcome. 

2. Other related information. More 

information on the registration review of 

DDVP may be located in the registration 

review schedule on the Agency’s 

website at http://www.epa.gov/

oppsrrd1/registration_review/

schedule.htm. Information on the 

Agency’s registration review program 

and its implementing regulation may be 

seen at http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/

registration_review. 

3. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during 

DDVP’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

• As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for DDVP will 

remain publicly accessible through the 

duration of the registration review 

process; that is, until all actions 

required in the final decision on the 

registration review case have been 

completed. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: October 7, 2009. 

Peter Caulkins, 

Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. E9–24685 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

October 5, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comments on 

this information collection should 

submit comments on November 13, 

2009. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices 52809 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), via fax 

at (202) 395–5167, or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Judith B. Herman, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC). To 

submit your PRA comments by e–mail 

send then to: PRA@fcc.gov. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to web page: http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the web page called 

’’Currently Under Review’’, (3) click on 

the downward–pointing arrow in the 

’’Select Agency’’ box below the 

’’Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ’’Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ’’Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ’’Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ’’Select Agency’’ box, and (6) 

when the FCC list appears, look for the 

title of this ICR (or its OMB Control 

Number, if there is one) and then click 

on the ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Judith B. Herman, OMD, 202–418–0214. 

For additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e–mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. 

Herman, 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No: 3060–0149. 

Title: Part 63, Application and 

Supplemental Information 

Requirements. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents: 90 

respondents; 90 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement and third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in sections 214 and 402. 

Total Annual Burden: 450 hours. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

Information filed in section 214 

applications has generally been non– 

confidential. Requests from parties 

seeking confidentiality are considered 

by Commission staff pursuant to agency 

rules. See 47 CFR 0.459 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Need and Uses: Section 214 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, requires that a carrier must 

first obtain FCC authorization either to: 

1) construct, operate, or engage in 

transmission over a line of 

communications, or 2) discontinue, 

reduce, or impair service over a line of 

communications. Part 63 of Title 47 of 

the Code of Federal Regulations 

implements Section 214. Part 63 also 

implements provisions of the Cable 

Communications Policy Act of 1984 

pertaining to video which was approved 

under OMB control number 3060–0149. 

In this submission to the OMB, the 

Commission is revising this IC. In the 

Report and Order , FCC 09–40, WC 

Docket No. 04–36, the Commission 

modified Part 63 to extend to providers 

of interconnected Voice over Internet 

Protocol (VoIP) service the 

discontinuance obligations that apply to 

domestic non–dominant 

telecommunications carriers under 

Section 214 of the Communications Act 

of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, the 

Commission found that before an 

interconnected VoIP provider may 

discontinue, reduce, or impair service, it 

must comply with the streamlined 

discontinuance requirements for non– 

dominant providers under Part 63 of the 

Commission’s rules, including the 

requirements to provide written notice 

to all affected customers, notify relevant 

state authorities, and file an application 

with the Commission for authorization 

of the planned action. In general, 

providers of facilities–based 

interconnected VoIP services and 

‘‘over–the–top’’ interconnected VoIP 

services are subject to the rules in the 

VoIP Discontinuance Order. However, 

the Commission found that it made 

more sense to treat providers of 

interconnected VoIP services that are 

mobile in the same way as Commercial 

Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers, 

which are not subject to the 

Commission’s Section 214 

discontinuance obligations. 

OMB Control No: 3060–XXXX. 

Title: Implementation of the NET 911 

Improvement Act of 2008; Location 

Information from Owners and 

Controllers of 911 and E911 

Capabilities. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: New collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents: 60 

respondents; 60 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: .0833 

hours (5 minutes). 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement and third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in the New and Emerging 

Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 

2008 (NET 911 Act), Public Law 110– 

283, Stat. 2620 (2008) (to be codified at 

47 CFR Section 615a–1), and section 

222 of the Communications Act of 1934, 

as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 5 hours. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

To implement section 222 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, the Commission’s rules 

impose a general duty on carriers to 

protect the privacy of customer 

proprietary network information and 

carrier proprietary information from 

unauthorized disclosure. See 47 CFR 

64.2001 et seq. In the Order, the 

Commission additionally has clarified 

that the Commission’s rules 

contemplate that incumbent LECs and 

other owners or controllers of 911 or 

E911 infrastructure will acquire 

information regarding interconnected 

VoIP providers and their customers for 

use in the provision of emergency 

services. We fully expect that these 

entities will use the information only for 

the provision of E911 services. To be 

clear, no entity may use customer 

information obtained as a result of the 

provision of 911 or E911 services for 

marketing purposes. 

Need and Uses: The Commission will 

submit this new information collection 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) during this 30 day comment 

period in order to obtain the full three 

year clearance from them. The 

Commission is reporting a program 

change increase of 60 respondents/ 

responses and therefore, the total annual 

burden is estimated to be 5 total annual 

burden hours. 

In a Report and Order, FCC 08–249, 

WC Docket No. 08–171, the FCC 

requires an owner or controller of a 911 

or enhanced 911 (E911) capability to 

make that capability available to a 

requesting interconnected Voice over 

Internet Protocol (VoIP) provider in 

certain circumstances. This requirement 

involves the collection and disclosure to 

emergency services personnel of 

customers’ location information. In a 

previous action, the Commission 

required interconnected VoIP providers 

to collect certain location information 

from their customers and disclose it to 

the entities that owner or control an 

Automatic Location Information (ALI) 

database. That OMB–approved required 

is under OMB Control Number 3060– 

1085. All the relevant costs of the 

entities that own or control an ALI 

database were previously described in 

3060–1085. The Commission has 

calculated the paperwork burdens of 

this present item in such a way as to 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

52810 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices 

prevent double counting for OMB’s 

inventory. For more information 

regarding this new information 

collection, see 74 Fed. Reg. 31860 (July 

6, 2009) available at <http://frwebtgate5.

access.gpo.gov/cgi–bin/PDFgate.cgi>? 

WAISdocID=594374209894+10+2+0&

WAISaction=retrieve. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–24569 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices; 

Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank 

Holding Companies 

The notificants listed below have 

applied under the Change in Bank 

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 

§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank 

holding company. The factors that are 

considered in acting on the notices are 

set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for 

immediate inspection at the Federal 

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices 

also will be available for inspection at 

the office of the Board of Governors. 

Interested persons may express their 

views in writing to the Reserve Bank 

indicated for that notice or to the offices 

of the Board of Governors. Comments 

must be received not later than October 

27, 2009. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of 

Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 

Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105– 

1521: 

1. Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P.; 

Patriot Financial Partners, L.P.; Patriot 

Financial Partners Parallel, L.P.; Patriot 

Financial Partners, GP, LLC; Patriot 

Financial Managers, L.P.; and Messrs. 

Ira M. Lubert; W. Kirk Wycoff; and 

James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania; to acquire voting shares 

of Heritage Oakes Bancorp, and thereby 

indirectly acquire voting shares of 

Heritage Bank, both in Paso Robles, 

California. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, October 7, 2009. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–24614 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Notice of Proposals To Engage in 

Permissible Nonbanking Activities or 

To Acquire Companies That are 

Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking 

Activities 

The companies listed in this notice 

have given notice under section 4 of the 

Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 

1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 

CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to 

acquire or control voting securities or 

assets of a company, including the 

companies listed below, that engages 

either directly or through a subsidiary or 

other company, in a nonbanking activity 

that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y 

(12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 

determined by Order to be closely 

related to banking and permissible for 

bank holding companies. Unless 

otherwise noted, these activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Each notice is available for inspection 

at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. 

The notice also will be available for 

inspection at the offices of the Board of 

Governors. Interested persons may 

express their views in writing on the 

question whether the proposal complies 

with the standards of section 4 of the 

BHC Act. Additional information on all 

bank holding companies may be 

obtained from the National Information 

Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding the applications must be 

received at the Reserve Bank indicated 

or the offices of the Board of Governors 

not later than October 27, 2009. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 

(Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs 

Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, 

Missouri 63166–2034: 

1. Community First Bancshares, Inc., 

Harrison, Arkansas, and White River 

Bancshares Company, Fayetteville, 

Arkansas, to engage directly in lending 

activities, pursuant to section 

225.28(b)(1)of Regulation Y. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, October 7, 2009. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–24613 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT 

INVESTMENT BOARD 

Employee Thrift Advisory Council 

Meeting; Sunshine Act; Notice of 

Meeting 

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), 

October 19, 2009. 

PLACE: 2nd Floor Training Room, 1250 

H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

STATUS: Parts will be open to the public 

and parts closed to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Parts Open to the Public 

1. Approval of the minutes of the 

September 24, 2009 Board member 

meeting. 

2. Approval of the Minutes of the 

April 22, 2009 ETAC meeting. 

3. Thrift Savings Plan activity report 

by the Executive Director. 

a. Participant Activity Report. 

b. Quarterly Investment Policy Report. 

4. Mid-Year Financial Audit Report. 

5. Quarterly Vendor Financial Report. 

6. Legislative Report. 

a. Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement 

Act Review; 

b. Report on Making Retirement 

Contributions from Unused Leave. 

7. Web site Demonstration. 

8. TSP Modernization Update. 

Parts Closed to the Public 

9. Proprietary Information. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of 

External Affairs, (202) 942–1640. 

Dated: October 8, 2009. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift 

Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–24737 Filed 10–9–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6760–01–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 3090–0121] 

General Services Administration 

Acquisition Regulation; Information 

Collection; Industrial Funding Fee and 

Sales Reporting 

AGENCY: Office of the Acquisition 

Policy, GSA. 

ACTION: Notice of request for 

reinstatement of an information 

collection requirement for an existing 

OMB clearance. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the General Services 

Administration will be submitting to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request to review and approve 

a reinstatement of a previously 

approved information collection 

requirement regarding industrial 

funding fee and sales reporting. 

Public comments are particularly 

invited on: Whether this collection of 

information is necessary and whether it 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES