alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52257-52258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW143962]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from North American Explorer Inc., and 
Bellevue Resources, Inc., for competitive oil and gas lease WYW143962 
for land in Campbell County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time 
and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease 
terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-
6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended

[[Page 52258]]

lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or 
fraction thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to 
reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. 
The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing 
Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate 
lease WYW143962 effective February 1, 2009, under the original terms 
and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.

Julie L. Weaver,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. E9-24404 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2951 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2951

To prohibit the operation of nuclear power plants unless there exists a 
    State and county certified radiological emergency response plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

  Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Hinchey, and Mr. Engel) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the operation of nuclear power plants unless there exists a 
    State and county certified radiological emergency response plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT.

    No nuclear utilization facility (within the meaning of the Atomic 
Energy Act of 1954) may operate unless the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission finds with respect to the facility that the State in which 
the facility is located, and each affected county or county equivalent 
located within a 10-mile radius of the facility, has certified within 
the last year a radiological emergency response plan which provides 
reasonable assurance that public health and safety is not endangered by 
the operation of the facility.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3150

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide funds for the 

security and stabilization of Iraq by suspending a portion of the reductions in the highest income tax rate for individual taxpayers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2003

Mr. LANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

funds for the security and stabilization of Iraq by suspending a portion of the reductions in the highest income 

tax rate for individual taxpayers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iraq Security and Sta5 bilization Fund Act’’. 
2

•HR 3150 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF FUNDS FOR SECURITY AND STA2 BILIZATION OF IRAQ THROUGH PARTIAL SUS3 PENSION OF REDUCTIONS IN HIGHEST IN4 COME TAX RATE FOR INDIVIDUAL TAX5 PAYERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Internal Revenue 

7 Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(j) PROVISION OF FUNDS FOR SECURITY AND STA10 BILIZATION OF IRAQ THROUGH PARTIAL SUSPENSION OF

11 REDUCTIONS IN HIGHEST INCOME TAX RATE.—

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 

13 year beginning in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, or 

14 2010, the 35 percent rate of tax under subsections 

15 (a), (b), (c), and (d) shall be adjusted to the per16 centage determined by the Secretary to result in an 

17 increase in revenues into the Treasury for all taxable 

18 years beginning in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 

19 and 2010 equal to $87,000,000,000. 

20 ‘‘(2) ADJUSTMENT OF TABLES.—The Secretary 

21 shall adjust the tables prescribed under subsection 

22 (f) to carry out this subsection.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

25 December 31, 2004.

Æ
# C_2016003EN.01000401.xml

| 7.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 19 June 2015

in Case E-19/14

EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway

v

(Non-compliance with a judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Article 33 SCA — Measures necessary to comply with a judgment of the Court)

(2016/C 3/05)

In Case E-19/14, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to take, within the time prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 16 July 2012 in Case E-9/11 ESA v Norway, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 19 June 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

ESA

Norway

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by failing to take, by the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion sent to the Kingdom of Norway by the EFTA Surveillance Authority pursuant to Article 31(2) of that Agreement, the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of 16 July 2012 in Case E-9/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by failing to take, by the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion sent to the Kingdom of Norway by the EFTA Surveillance Authority pursuant to Article 31(2) of that Agreement, the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of 16 July 2012 in Case E-9/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3080

To amend section 5379 of title 5, United States Code, to increase the 

annual and aggregate limits on student loan repayments by Federal agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2003

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To amend section 5379 of title 5, United States Code, to 

increase the annual and aggregate limits on student loan 

repayments by Federal agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Stu5 dent Loan Assistance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS. 

7 Section 5379(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$6,000’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$10,000’’; and 
2

•HR 3080 IH 

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$40,000’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘$60,000’’.

Æ
#### § 1208.79 Prohibited actions by employer.

The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 prohibits an employer from discharging, refusing to employ, or taking disciplinary action against the debtor due to the issuance of a withholding order under this subpart E.
# C_2018414EN.01000901.xml

| 15.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 June 2018

in Case E-14/17

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) No 447/2013)

(2018/C 414/11)

In Case E-14/17, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbb of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 447/2013 of 15 May 2013 establishing the procedure for AIFMs which choose to opt in under Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, part of its internal legal order, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 14 June 2018, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbb of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 447/2013 of 15 May 2013 establishing the procedure for AIFMs which choose to opt in under Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, part of its internal legal order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbb of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 447/2013 of 15 May 2013 establishing the procedure for AIFMs which choose to opt in under Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, part of its internal legal order.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
Exhibit 23.2








INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-00362, 333-24809 and 333-34193 of Elcom International,  Inc. on Forms S-8 of
our reports each dated 21 March,  1997  (relating to the 1996 and 1995 financial
statements of Elcom  International  Limited and AMA (UK) Limited),  appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Elcom International,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.


/s/  Deloitte & Touche
Deloitte & Touche
Chartered Accountants
London, England
29 March 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2983 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2983

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
  of Indian tribal organizations for grants for the establishment of 
                  veterans cemeteries on trust lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

   Mr. Udall of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
  of Indian tribal organizations for grants for the establishment of 
                  veterans cemeteries on trust lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Veterans Cemetery 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF INDIAN TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR GRANTS FOR THE 
              ESTABLISHMENT OF VETERANS CEMETERIES ON TRUST LANDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2408 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f)(1) The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to any 
tribal organization to assist the tribal organization in establishing, 
expanding, or improving veterans' cemeteries on trust land owned by, or 
held in trust for, the tribal organization.
    ``(2) Grants under this subsection shall be made in the same 
manner, and under the same conditions, as grants to States are made 
under the preceding provisions of this section.
    ``(3) In this subsection:
            ``(A) The term `tribal organization' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 3764(4) of this title.
            ``(B) The term `trust land' has the meaning given that term 
        in section 3764(1) of this title.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a)(2) of such section is 
amended by striking ``under paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``under this 
section''.
                                 <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 12.1**

I, Pasquale Natuzzi, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisamendment no. 1 on Form 20-F/A to the annual report of Natuzzi S.p.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 10, 2019 

 

/s/ Pasquale Natuzzi
Name: Pasquale NatuzziTitle: Chief Executive Officer**
#### § 328.0 Purpose.

Subpart A of this part describes the official signs and advertising statement and prescribes their use by insured depository institutions, as well as other signs to prevent customer confusion in the event non-deposit products are offered by an insured depository institution. Subpart A applies to insured depository institutions, including insured branches of foreign banks, but does not apply to non-insured offices or branches of insured depository institutions located in foreign countries.
# C_2009145EN.01001701.xml

| 25.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/17

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

2009/C 145/11

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 17 December 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 65614 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Amendments to the aid scheme for research and development concerning gas technologies with improved environmental performance (Gassnova) |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) and 61(3)(c) |
| Objective | : | Promotion of research and development concerning fossil fuels technologies with improved environmental performance |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | Approximately NOK 80 000 000 annually, or approximately EUR 8 900 000 annually |
| Duration | : | Until 30 November 2015 |
| Economic sectors | : | Fossil fuels technologies |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
| PO Box 8148 Dep |
| Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

17 December 2008

Case number

:

65614

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Amendments to the aid scheme for research and development concerning gas technologies with improved environmental performance (Gassnova)

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) and 61(3)(c)

Objective

:

Promotion of research and development concerning fossil fuels technologies with improved environmental performance

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

:

Approximately NOK 80 000 000 annually, or approximately EUR 8 900 000 annually

Duration

:

Until 30 November 2015

Economic sectors

:

Fossil fuels technologies

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

PO Box 8148 Dep

Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3118

To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the Wilbur Wright 

Federal Building in Washington, District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. HAYES (for himself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. BURR, Mr. TURNER of Ohio, 

Mr. COBLE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. BALLANCE, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. BEAUPREZ, and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the 

Wilbur Wright Federal Building in Washington, District 

of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ORVILLE WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

5 800 Independence Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, 

6 District of Columbia, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Orville Wright Federal Building’’. 
2

•HR 3118 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Orville 

5 Wright Federal Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WILBUR WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING. 

7 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

8 600 Independence Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, 

9 District of Columbia, shall be known and designated as 

10 the ‘‘Wilbur Wright Federal Building’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

14 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Wilbur 

15 Wright Federal Building’’.

Æ
|  | Latest Issue of TIFIA Times                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | Past Issues of the TIFIA Times- June 2005, Issue 12
- May 2005, Issue 11
- March 2005, Issue 10
- August 2004, Issue 9
- March 2004, Issue 8
- May 2003, Issue 7
- April 2003, Issue 6
- March 2003, Issue 5
- June 2002, Issue 4
- January 2002, Issue 3
- May 2001, Issue 2
- March 2001, Issue 1 |
|  | Email Notifications.  Sign up to receive the *TIFIA Times* and other important TIFIA news announcements via email.                                                                                                                                                                                  |

 

*This page last revised as of 02/23/06*