alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 18, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, November 18, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24095 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 313.27 Refunds.

Amounts recovered by administrative offset but later found not to be owed to the Government shall be promptly refunded. Unless required by law or contract, such refunds shall not bear interest.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00291-CV

Castine McIlhargey and Jody McIntyre, Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of A+ 

Pro Recovery and Towing, LLC

v.

Erik M. Hager, Jason Rios, Eduardo Pena, Joanna Pena, and South Padre Towing and 

Recovery, LLC

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-03294-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 28, 2021
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), StevenD. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### § 304.14 Reservation of authority.

Notwithstanding § 304.13, the Corporation, in consultation with the applicable state chartering authority, may require an otherwise eligible covered depository institution to file the FFIEC 041 version of the report of condition, or any successor thereto, based on an institution-specific determination. In making this determination, the Corporation may consider criteria including, but not limited to, whether the institution is significantly engaged in one or more complex, specialized, or other higher-risk activities, such as those for which limited information is reported in the FFIEC 051 version of the report of condition compared to the FFIEC 041 version of the report of condition. Nothing in this part shall be construed to limit the Corporation's authority to obtain information from insured depository institutions.
### HPV 3 CASRN 98-56-6 EPA Review and acceptance of Test Plan from Greenwich Chemical Toxicity to Algae Paul Campanella to: John V. Massingale 03/14/2012 09:56 AM Cc: John Schaeffer, Marcus Aguilar From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: "John V. Massingale" <j ohn@grcci.com> Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US 

### John, EPA has reviewed the protocol submitted for the Algae Toxicity test under the HPV 3 Final Rule for CASRN 98-56-6 and finds it acceptable.

98-56-6 EPA Rev Acceptance _Algae protocol .pd f


### Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091
Exhibit99C

 

FIRSTAMENDMENT TO THE NEW Fairways, l.p.

agreementof limited partnership

ThisFirst Amendment (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of July 1,2008, and amends that certain Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as ofOctober 13, 1992 of The New Fairways, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership(the “Original Agreement”), by and between Davidson Growth Plus GPLimited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the “GeneralPartner”), and Davidson Growth Plus, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership(the “Limited Partner”).

**RECITAL**

Article16 of the Original Agreement provides that the Original Agreement may be amendedat the election of the Limited Partner with the consent of the GeneralPartner.

**AGREEMENT**

Inconsideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and forother good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

**1.                 ****Defined Terms**.  Capitalized terms used herein butnot otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings set forth in theOriginal Agreement.

**2.                 ****Amendment**.  

**(a)              **The Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “December 31,2011” from Article 5.1 and replacing such language with “January 1,2022”.

**(b)              **The Original Agreement is hereby amended by adding the phrase “Exceptas set forth in Article 8.1(d),” at the beginning of Article 14.4(q).

**(c)               **The Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the secondparagraph of Article 16 in its entirety.

**3.                 ****Continuation**.  Except as amended hereby, theOriginal Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in fullforce and effect.

**4.                 ****Miscellaneous**.

**(a)              **This Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties andtheir respective successors and assigns.  

**(b)              **This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (and by facsimilesignature), each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shallconstitute one and the same instrument.

**(c)               **This Amendment and its application shall be governed by the laws ofthe State of Delaware, without regard to conflicts of law provisions.

**[Signatures on Next Page]**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PRESTON CORNELIUS EVERETT, a/k/a P,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-05-19)

Submitted: January 11, 2006 Decided: January 31, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Smith, ENGLISH & SMITH, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, John Eisinger,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Preston Cornelius Everett was found guilty of conspiracy

to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of

cocaine (Count 1) and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a

drug trafficking crime (Count 2). The Government timely filed

notice under 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2000) that it would be seeking an

enhanced sentence in Count 1 because of Everett’s prior Virginia

felony conviction for possession of cocaine. The court sentenced

Everett to the mandatory minimum sentence of twenty years, based on

his prior Virginia drug felony under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A)

(West 2000 & Supp. 2005) for Count 1 and to sixty months

consecutively on Count 2. On appeal, Everett alleges that his

240-month sentence for Count 1 violated: (1) the Sixth Amendment

under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and (2) his due

process rights. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Everett’s first claim fails because, as we recently held,

the rule announced in Booker does not apply to statutory mandatory

minimum sentences. See United States v. Groce, 398 F.3d 679, 682

n.2 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that judicial determination of how a

gun was used, which determines the mandatory minimum sentence in a

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) violation, is not affected by Booker); see also

Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 568 (2002). 

Next, Everett argues that his due process rights were

violated because use of his prior felony Virginia drug offense,
- 3 -

which would only have been a misdemeanor under federal law,

significantly enhanced his sentence. Such due process claims are

analogous to equal protection claims. See Chapman v. United

States, 500 U.S. 453, 465 (1991); Jones v. United States, 463 U.S.

354, 362, n.10 (1983). We have rejected the argument that

incorporating state definitions into the federal statutes violates

the Equal Protection Clause. See United States v. Lender, 985 F.2d

151, 156 n.* (4th Cir. 1993). Thus, this claim fails.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 238.98 Enforcement.

Except as provided in this section, the Board administers and enforces the Interlocks Act with respect to savings and loan holding companies and its affiliates, and may refer any case of a prohibited interlocking relationship involving these entities to the Attorney General of the United States to enforce compliance with the Interlocks Act and this part. If an affiliate of a savings and loan holding company is subject to the primary regulation of another Federal depository organization supervisory agency, then the Board does not administer and enforce the Interlocks Act with respect to that affiliate.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XS08


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Enforcement Consultants Committee (EC) will hold a working meeting, 
which is open to the public.

DATES: The EC meeting will be held Monday, October 26, 2009, from 1 
p.m. until business for the day is completed.

ADDRESSES: The Pacific Council EC will meet via a telephone conference 
and will have a listening station for public access at the Pacific 
Council office, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 
97220.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jim Seger, Staff Officer; 
telephone: (503) 820-2280.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the EC meeting is to review 
the Pacific Council's November 2009 agenda and prepare for reports to 
be provided to the Pacific Council at the meeting. The EC will continue 
development of its reports for the Pacific Council at a subsequent 
meeting starting at 10 a.m. on Saturday, October 31. Notice of the EC's 
October 31 meeting will be provided with the announcement of the 
Pacific Council's October 31 through November 5 meeting.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may come before the EC for discussion, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal EC action during this meeting. EC action will be 
restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any 
issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency 
action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the EC's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Ms. Carolyn Porter at (503) 820-2280 at least 5 
days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-24194 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Resettlement Diplomacy Network Senior Officials Meeting

# 									Resettlement Diplomacy Network Senior Officials Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 2, 2023

Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Julieta Valls Noyes convened the first senior officials’ meeting of the Resettlement Diplomacy Network (RDN) under the inaugural chairmanship of the government of the United States. The meeting was held in Washington, D.C. from May 31 to June 1.Government officials from Australia, Canada, Italy, New Zealand, Spain, and the United Kingdom, along with representatives of the European Commission, participated in the exchange.The RDN meeting provided an opportunity for discussion on how states can collaborate to advance shared priorities on refugee resettlement and complementary pathways to protection. Participants discussed their continued commitment to Afghan resettlement and the key lessons learned from that evacuation and other emergency response efforts; opportunities to strengthen emergency transit infrastructure for refugees; the need to expand global identification and referral mechanisms for a growing number of pathways to protection; and opportunities for strategic cooperation on pathways across priority regions. On the second day of the meeting, participants were joined by key representatives from international organizations, civil society, and refugee led organizations to provide additional perspective on RDN priority issues.The United States will convene a ministerial meeting of the RDN on the margins of the UN General Assembly in September 2023.The RDN is a new multilateral initiative launched by the government of the United States in September 2022. Its goal is to drive high-level strategic and diplomatic engagement aimed at strengthening and expanding global resettlement and other pathways to protection. The RDN provides a trusted forum to identify opportunities for closer cooperation between its participants as well as to amplify, enhance, and elevate the importance of resettlement and complementary pathways as part of the global protection system.The U.S. chairmanship of the RDN is supported by the Refugee Hub and the Migration Policy Institute, which serve as the co-hosts of the inaugural secretariat for the RDN.

Tags

AustraliaBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationCanadaDiplomacyItalyNew ZealandOffice of the SpokespersonRefugeesResettlementSpainUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
# C_2020204EN.01002201.xml

| 18.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/22

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 204/16)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11 March 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 84744 |
| Decision No | 017/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | The Hywind Tampen Project |
| Legal basis | ‘Promotion of energy from renewable sources’ aid scheme under Enova’s programme ‘Full scale innovative energy and climate technology’ |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Renewable energy, environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | NOK 2 229,6 million (discounted) |
| Intensity | 43,5 % |
| Economic sectors | Production of electricity |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Enova SF
  Brattørkaia 17A
  7010 Trondheim
  NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

11 March 2020

Case No

84744

Decision No

017/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

The Hywind Tampen Project

Legal basis

‘Promotion of energy from renewable sources’ aid scheme under Enova’s programme ‘Full scale innovative energy and climate technology’

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Renewable energy, environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

NOK 2 229,6 million (discounted)

Intensity

43,5 %

Economic sectors

Production of electricity

Name and address of the granting authority

Enova SF

Brattørkaia 17A

7010 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2





                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Elcom International, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 7, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of Elcom International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
other comprehensive income (loss), stockholders equity, cash flows, and related
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the years in the
two-year period then ended, incorporated herein by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-94743 and 333-90964) on Form S-3 and the registration
statements (Nos. 333-00362, 333-24809, 333-34193, 333-67927, 333-81795,
333-54852, 333-61316 and 333-91488) on Form S-8, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Elcom International, Inc., and
the reference to our firm under Item 6 - Selected Financial Data in the annual
report on Form 10-K.

Our reports dated March 7, 2003 contain an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an
accumulated deficit, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of that uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 6, 2021

b0628

Order 

Clerk

July 6, 2021

159271

LEONARD S. BOHN, Individually and as

Representative of a Class of Similarly

Situated Persons and Entities,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 159271

COA: 339306

Wayne CC: 15-013727-CZ

CITY OF TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 8, 2020, the application for leave to appeal the January 29,

2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

DAART v City of Detroit (Docket No. 158852). On order of the Court, the case having 

been decided on December 11, 2020, 506 Mich 996 (2020), the application is again 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Cathleen Shoenfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 15, 2004
```