alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Laurence F Mulhern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Elcom International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

Date: April 11, 2005

/s/ Laurence F. Mulhern

Laurence F. Mulhern
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 5, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Christine Jacobs,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
    Report.




Date:
      May 12, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      M. Christine JacobsM.
      Christine JacobsChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2019322EN.01000301.xml

| 26.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/3

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2019/C 322/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 10 July 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 83860 |
| Decision No | : | 056/19/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Rail freight support scheme |
| Legal basis | : | Guidelines of the Norwegian Railway Directorate |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Coordination of transport |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant |
| Budget | : | NOK 235,74 million |
| Intensity | : | 50 % |
| Duration | : | 3 years |
| Economic sectors | : | Freight rail transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | The Norwegian Railway Directorate |
| DFØ Trondheim |
| Postboks 4746 |
| 7468 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

10 July 2019

Case No

:

83860

Decision No

:

056/19/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Rail freight support scheme

Legal basis

:

Guidelines of the Norwegian Railway Directorate

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

:

Coordination of transport

Form of aid

:

Direct grant

Budget

:

NOK 235,74 million

Intensity

:

50 %

Duration

:

3 years

Economic sectors

:

Freight rail transport

Name and address of the granting authority

:

The Norwegian Railway Directorate

DFØ Trondheim

Postboks 4746

7468 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
42567.

#### McCRARY v. A A MUSIC SERVICE, INC. et al.

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*

Submitted January 4, 1967

Decided January 19, 1967.

*J. M. Grubbs, Jr., Essley Burdine,*for appellant.

*LeBoy C. Hobbs, Carpenter Karp,*for appellees.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Where one seeks to impose civil liability for a conspiracy, unless the element of combination adds such a power of coercion, undue influence or restraint of trade as to make unlawful certain types of conduct in which one man alone might legitimately engage (see *Vandhitch v. Alverson,*52 Ga. App. 308, 310 (1) (183 SE 105); Prosser, the Law of Torts, (3d Ed.), p. 260, § 43), “the gist of the action is not the conspiracy alleged, but the tort committed against the plaintiff and the resulting damage. The plaintiff must allege all the elements of a cause of action for the tort the same as would be required if there were no allegation of a conspiracy.” *J & C Ornamental Iron Co. v. Watkins,*114 Ga. App. 688 (152 SE2d 613). Accordingly, where a petition merely alleges an oppressive course of conduct characterized by sharp business practices without setting forth all the necessary elements of a distinct tort committed during the course of the conduct resulting in damage, the petition is subject to general demurrer notwithstanding allegations'that defendants conspired to gain plaintiff's business and cause his financial ruin. *J & C Ornamental Iron Co. v. Watkins,*supra; *Drummond v. McKinley,*65 Ga. App. 145 (15 SE2d 535).

*Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3



                          EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

         THIS EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of November 3, 1998, is
executed by FPX, INC., a Tennessee corporation ("FPX"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of METAL MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
for the sole purpose of granting a guarantee under the Indenture (as amended
from time to time, the "Indenture"), dated as of May 13, 1998, with respect to
the Company's 10% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "Notes"), entered into
among the Company, the Guarantors (as defined therein) and LASALLE NATIONAL
BANK, as trustee (the "Trustee").

                              PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

         The Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee have entered into the
Indenture. Capitalized terms used herein, not otherwise defined herein, shall
have the meanings given them in the Indenture.

         Section 4.18 of the Indenture expressly provides that any Restricted
Subsidiary (i) that has assets or revenues in any fiscal year in excess of
$200,000 or (ii) that is not a Guarantor and is a borrower under the Senior
Credit Facility shall execute a supplemental indenture to become a Guarantor of
the Company's Notes. Pursuant to Section 4.18 of the Indenture, FPX executes
this Eighth Supplemental Indenture to a become Guarantor of the Company's Notes.
FPX has, by Board Resolution, authorized this Eighth Supplemental Indenture. The
Trustee has determined that this Eighth Supplemental Indenture is in form
satisfactory to it.

         NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually covenanted and agreed, for the equal and
proportionate benefit of all Holders of the Notes issued under the Indenture
from and after the date of this Eighth Supplemental Indenture, as follows:

         Section 1.   Guarantee on the Notes.

         FPX hereby subjects itself to the provisions of the Indenture as a
Guarantor in accordance with Article 11 of the Indenture.

         Section 2.   Counterparts

         This Eighth Supplemental Indenture may be executed in several
counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on
all parties, notwithstanding that all parties have not signed the same
counterpart.




<PAGE>   2




         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Eighth
Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed by its respective officers as of the
day and year first above written.

                                    FPX, INC.


                                    By: /s/ David A. Carpenter
                                        -------------------------------------
                                    Name: David A. Carpenter
                                          -----------------------------------   
                                    Its: Vice President
                                         ------------------------------------




                                      -2-
Table of Contents - Exhibits

Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries of Masisa

|                                            |  |                              
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                            |  |                              
|                                           
|Forestal Tornagaleones S.A.                 |  | Chile                        
|Masisa Overseas Limited                     |  | Cayman Islands               
|Masisa do Brasil LTDA.                      |  | Brazil                       
|Masisa Argentina S.A.                       |  | Argentina                    
|Inversiones Coronel Limitada                |  | Chile                        
|Masisa Concepcion Limitada                  |  | Chile                        
|Maderas y Sintéticos de Mexico S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       
|Masisa Inversiones Limitada                 |  | Chile                        

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,616,045
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,705,397
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,901,495
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,547,537
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,580,307
<LOANS>                                     99,440,846
<ALLOWANCE>                                    523,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,806,332
<DEPOSITS>                                 114,537,907
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,611,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,053,297
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,757
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,238,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             150,806,332
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,257,279
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,763,379
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               429,433
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,450,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,369,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,728,299
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,721,792
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,835,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,566,239
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,566,239
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,580,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.66
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,382,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                31,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               576,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   63,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              523,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           523,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Nicholas W. Ryan et al., Respondents, *v.*Albert E. Donovan, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

C. F. Brandt, for appellant.

Whalen & Dunn, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

It was assumed on the trial (see particularly the charge of the trial court) that the only question in dispute related to the carting of the brick and to the amount due for sand. It was shown by competent evidence on the part of the plaintiffs that the defendant was entitled to $865.42 for carting brick, and to $432.71 for sand. It was conceded that defendant was entitled to $217.30 for other things, making a total of $1,515.43 and no more, to which the defendant was entitled. It was taken for granted on the trial that plaintiffs had paid the defendant $1,600 in cash, and there was competent evidence tending to show that they had paid out on defendant’s account for sand and cartage the sum of $292.37, making a total of $1,892.37. The verdict was for $372.19, and is amply sustained by the evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs:
### 7s9 ‘-

Honorable I’ax Steroke, Page S

9. That tb,e manawasnt or the Authority Is hereby lnatruoted by the diraotoca to notify all employee that ttiie right to oolleotlre bargaining la reoognlzed. w TheAot oreating the Lower Colorado 9lrer Authority oonferrr pouer upon the Boar61

*(rn) To appoint oftioerr, agents and 

### l laployeer, tvr;.yoribe their **Qutisa** and to fix their aompen-

”

, Item 1 ot the Rerolutlon does no rare thq doolarr

the present policy of the Board uith napeat to the pament of *ages. It merely embodies the attltutlr which t&o Bmrd, hae adopted in respeot to the matter of fixing 

### the soapmationto be paid smploy~eo 

### of the 

### AIO.hority.Thieirolrarlf within the power of the Board un&er Seation %P abevo quoted.

Item a of the FMolutlon merely 

### l tilrmlarthat the pnrent. pollog tidopted 

## by tha Board Is to raoognise the right of fto mployee* to organIt aadbargain oollrotitel~. No attempt Ia madeta bind the Beard, lrnrooabl.y, to a rtated :& course of aotlon oalaulatra ts d**trof or h~palrtho free y:; I exerolse QSthe $&I-ant and dlmorotion ot 

### theBoard in re- ” speot to the perfonnanoe of fte dutlm. (See our opinion so. tM6125)

You are adrlre~;~thb~~~,,,lncur opinion, the ‘*doptlon of rush Reedlutlon is ulthln 

### thd’poueroi the Board. YOUCIvery truly



## , m /- - I?.w.Yalrohild

**k8418tant** RWILM APPROVEDDEC 18, 1940
§ 210.4 Sending items to Reserve Banks. ( a ) *Sending of items.* A sender's Administrative Reserve Bank may direct a sender other than a Reserve Bank to send any item to a specified Reserve Bank, whether or not the item is payable in the Reserve Bank's district.
( b ) *Handling of items.* ( 1 ) The following parties, in the following order, are deemed to have handled an item that is sent to a Reserve Bank for collection: ( i ) The initial sender;
( ii ) The initial sender's Administrative Reserve Bank (which is deemed to have accepted deposit of the item from the initial sender);
( iii ) The Reserve Bank that receives the item from the initial sender (if different from the initial sender's Administrative Reserve Bank); and
( iv ) Another Reserve Bank, if any, that receives the item from a Reserve Bank.
( 2 ) A Reserve Bank that is not described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is not a person that handles an item and is not a collecting bank with respect to an item.
( 3 ) The identity and order of the parties under paragraph (b)(1) of this section determine the relationships and the rights and liabilities of the parties under this subpart, part 229 of this chapter (Regulation CC), section 13(1) and section 16(13) of the Federal Reserve Act, and the Uniform Commercial Code. An initial sender's Administrative Reserve Bank that is deemed to accept an item for deposit or handle an item is also deemed to be a sender with respect to that item. The Reserve Banks that are deemed to handle an item are deemed to be agents or subagents of the owner of the item, as provided in § 210.6(a).
( c ) *Checks received at par.* The Reserve Banks shall receive cash items and other checks at par.
[Reg. J, 77 FR 21858, Apr. 12, 2012; 83 FR 61518, Nov. 30, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (Items 1-4, 9 a.m.-12 noon; Item 5, 2 p.m.-5 p.m.

      ( print page 52460)    

# Place:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

Commission Briefing/Meeting-Open to the Public.

## Matters To Be Considered

1. Lab Accreditation Requirements for Lead.

2. Brass Lead Exclusions Petition.

3. Lead Determination Guidance.

4. Recreational Off Highway Vehicles (ROHVS) ANPR.

5. Toy Safety Certification Program, Toy Industry Association (TIA), Consumers Union (CU) and Consumer Federation of America (CFA).

(This meeting was requested by the participants. For the convenience of all of the Commissioners, the meetings are being consolidated into one public meeting.)

                    A live webcast of the Briefing can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast/​index.html.*

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: October 6, 2009.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-24533 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVJATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Boston Executive Helicopters Complainant


### v. FAA Docket No. 

### 16-15-05 Town ofNorwood, Massachusetts And Norwood Airport Commission Respondents



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 

### 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 

### 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 19, 

### 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Di ector, Airport Compliance

a d Management Analysis Date

# No~k 11 

# 1 

# zot5"
•CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November
__ , 20 16 , I caused to be placed in the United States mail (ftrst class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension ofTime addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Timothy I. McCulloch H inshaw & Culbertson LLP 2375 East Camelback Road Suite 750 Phoenix , AZ 85016
Counsel for Respondents: Brandon H. Moss, Esq. Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP Crown Colony Plaza 300 Crown Colony Drive, Suite 410 Quincy, MA 02169 Town ofNorwood, Massachusetts 566 Washington Street Norwood, Massachusetts 02062 Norwood Airport Commiss ion 125 Access Road Norwood, Massachusetts 02062 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-61 0 FAA Airport Compliance and Management

Analysis , AC0-1 00

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis