Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 50957 

3See Letter from Merrick, Re: Steel Wire Garment 

Hangers From the People’s Republic of China; A– 

570–918; Notice of Withdrawal by Merrick 

Engineering, Inc., submitted on August 19, 2009. 

4See Stainless Steel Bar From the United 

Kingdom: Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order, in 

Part, 72 FR 65706 (November 23, 2007); see also 

Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation of 

Order In Part: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from Germany, 71 FR 66163 

(November 13, 2006). 

5See Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Steel Wire Garment Hangers from 

the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 15726 (March 

25, 2008) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

withdrew its opposition 3 to the partial 

revocation of the Order with respect to 

chrome-plated steel wire garment 

hangers with a diameter of 3.4 mm or 

greater. 

On September 3, 2009, the 

Department requested comments from 

Petitioner with regard to the effective 

date for the final results of this changed 

circumstances review. On September 9, 

2009, Petitioner submitted a letter in 

which it stated that it took no position 

regarding the effective date for the final 

results in this changed circumstances 

review. On September 11, 2009, the 

Department received comments from 

Target Corporation requesting that the 

final results of this changed 

circumstances review be applied 

retroactively to all unliquidated entries. 

Scope of the Changed Circumstances 

Review 

The merchandise covered by this 

changed circumstances review is steel 

wire garment hangers from the PRC 

meeting the following criteria: the steel 

wire garment hanger must be chromeplated with a diameter of 3.4 mm or 

greater. Effective upon publication of 

these final results of changed 

circumstances review in the Federal 

Register, the amended scope of the 

Order will read as stated below. 

Scope of the Amended Order 

The merchandise that is subject to the 

order is steel wire garment hangers, 

fabricated from carbon steel wire, 

whether or not galvanized or painted, 

whether or not coated with latex or 

epoxy or similar gripping materials, 

and/or whether or not fashioned with 

paper covers or capes (with or without 

printing) and/or nonslip features such 

as saddles or tubes. These products may 

also be referred to by a commercial 

designation, such as shirt, suit, strut, 

caped, or latex (industrial) hangers. 

Specifically excluded from the scope of 

the order are wooden, plastic, and other 

garment hangers that are not made of 

steel wire. Also excluded from the scope 

of the order are chrome-plated steel wire 

garment hangers with a diameter of 3.4 

mm or greater. The products subject to 

the order are currently classified under 

HTSUS subheadings 7326.20.0020 and 

7323.99.9060. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review; Partial 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order 

In accordance with section 751(b) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(g), the 

Department continues to find, as it did 

in the Initiation and Preliminary 

Results, that U.S. producers 

representing substantially all of the 

production of the domestic like product 

pertaining to the part of the Order to be 

revoked have expressed a lack of 

interest in the part of the revoked Order. 

Specifically, we find that Petitioner and 

Supporters represent substantially all 

U.S. production of the like product, 

have expressed an affirmative statement 

of no interest concerning chrome-plated 

steel wire garment hangers with a 

diameter of 3.4 mm or greater, as 

described herein, and that this 

constitutes changed circumstances 

sufficient to warrant revocation of this 

Order in part. Additionally, although 

the Department requested domestic 

production data from Merrick and 

Petitioner, Merrick subsequently 

withdrew its opposition to Petitioner’s 

request to revoke the Order, in part. 

Therefore, the Department finds that 

there is no domestic industry 

opposition, on the record of this review, 

to Petitioner’s request to revoke the 

Order, in part, with regard to chromeplated steel wire garment hangers with 

a diameter of 3.4 mm or greater. 

Accordingly, the Department is partially 

revoking the Order on steel wire 

garment hangers from the PRC with 

respect to chrome-plated steel wire 

garment hangers with a diameter of 3.4 

mm or greater, in accordance with 

sections 751(b), (d) and 782(h) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.216(d) and 

351.222(g) of the Department’s 

regulations. 

In this changed circumstances review 

we are revoking the Order, in part, 

retroactively, in accordance with our 

normal practice for this type of changed 

circumstances review,4 to March 25, 

2008, (the effective date of the 

Preliminary Determination 5 in the 

original less-than-fair-valueinvestigation) because entries on or after 

this date are not yet subject to a final 

determination of the amount of 

antidumping duty by the Department. 

We will instruct the U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to liquidate without 

regard to antidumping duties, as 

applicable, and to refund any estimated 

cash deposits collected for all 

unliquidated entries of chrome-plated 

steel wire garment hangers with a 

diameter of 3.4 mm or greater, meeting 

the specifications indicated above, made 

on or after March 25, 2008, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.222. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’s) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This changed circumstances 

administrative review, partial 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order and notice are in accordance with 

sections 751(b), (d) and 782(h) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.216(e) and 

351.222(g). 

Dated: September 24, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–23798 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Notice of Intent To Renew 

Collection 3038–0031, Procurement 

Contracts 

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (‘‘the 

Commission’’) is announcing an 

opportunity for public comment on the 

proposed collection of certain 

information by the agency. Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal 

agencies are required to publish notice 

in the Federal Register concerning each 

proposed collection of information, and 

to allow 60 days for comment in 

response to the notice. This notice 

solicits comments on requirements 

relating to information collected to 

assist the Commission in soliciting and 

awarding contracts. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
50958 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before December 1, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Steven A. Grossman, Office of Financial 

Management, U.S. Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20581. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven A. Grossman, (202) 418–5192; 

FAX (202) 418–5529; e-mail: 

sgrossman@cftc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA, Federal agencies must obtain 

approval from the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 

information they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 

1320.3(c) and includes agency requests 

or requirements that members of the 

public submit reports, keep records, or 

provide information to a third party. 

Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal 

agencies to provide a 60-day notice in 

the Federal Register concerning each 

proposed collection of information, 

including each proposed extension of an 

existing collection of information, 

before submitting the collection to OMB 

for approval. To comply with this 

requirement, the Commission is 

publishing notice of the proposed 

collection of information listed below. 

With respect to the following 

collection of information, the 

Commission invites comments on: 

• Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have a practical use; 

• The accuracy of the Commission’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

• Ways to enhance the quality of, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden of 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

Procurement Contracts, OMB Control 

No. 3038–0031—Extension 

The information collection consists of 

procurement activities relating to 

solicitations, amendments to 

solicitations, requests for quotations, 

construction contracts, awards of 

contracts, performance bonds, and 

payment information for individuals 

(vendors) or contractors engaged in 

providing supplies or services. 

The Commission estimates the burden 

of this collection of information as 

follows: 

ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Annual number of respondents Frequency of 

response 

Total annual 

responses 

Hours per 

response Total hours 

182 ................................................................................................................... Annually 182 2 364 

There are no capital costs or operating 

and maintenance costs associated with 

this collection. 

Dated: September 28, 2009. 

David Stawick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–23815 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Intent To Prepare a Draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Puget Sound Nearshore Marine 

Habitat Restoration Project, WA 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), 

Seattle District, as lead Federal agency, 

will prepare a draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) 

evaluating a process based restoration 

project in the marine nearshore zone of 

Puget Sound, Washington to address the 

interruption and degradation of 

nearshore habitat resulting from the 

disturbance of habitat forming processes 

caused by various human influences. 

This environmental impact statement 

will be a combined Federal NEPA and 

Washington State Environmental Policy 

Act (SEPA) document. The lead agency 

for SEPA will be the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife. This is 

an opportunity for public comment; 

there will not be a separate SEPA 

process. 

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section for meeting dates. 

ADDRESSES: Mrs. Chemine Jackels, 

Environmental Resources Section, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 

3755, Seattle, WA 98124–3755. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions regarding the scoping process 

or preparation of the draft PEIS may be 

directed to: Chemine Jackels (206) 764– 

3646. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

1. Proposed Action: The Corps of 

Engineers and the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife 

propose to evaluate alternative process 

based habitat restoration actions in the 

nearshore zone of Puget Sound (defined 

as that portion of Puget Sound that 

extends waterward from the upland and 

backshore areas that directly influence 

conditions along the marine shoreline to 

the depth offshore where light 

penetration falls below a level that 

supports plant growth and in river 

deltas to the head of tide) which 

encompasses Whatcom, Skagit, Island, 

San Juan, Snohomish, King, Pierce, 

Thurston, Mason, Kitsap, Jefferson, and 

Clallam counties, Washington. For 

preparation of this draft PEIS, the Corps, 

Seattle District is the lead Federal 

agency under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq.) and the Council on Environmental 

Quality’s implementing guidelines (40 

CFR 1500–1508). The Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife is the 

lead State agency under the Washington 

SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW) and the 

SEPA guidelines (Chapter 197–11 

WAC). 

The Corps is authorized to study 

Puget Sound water uses under Section 

209 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 

(Pub. L. 87–874). Corps of Engineers 

activities in ecosystem restoration will 

concentrate on restoring and performing 

scientific analysis of habitat forming 

processes (i.e., hydrology, sediment 

transport, nutrient delivery) in the 

marine nearshore zone of Puget Sound. 

The proposed action could potentially 

restore nearshore ecosystem habitat and 

processes by reconnecting isolated 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES