alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gelu Voicu, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Catalyst Semiconductor,
Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:
    
    June 29, 2004By:
    
    /s/ Gelu VoicuGelu VoicuPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3161 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to establish a 
                         do-not-call registry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY.

    (a) Authority.--The Federal Trade Commission is authorized under 
section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 
Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to implement and enforce a 
national do-not-call registry.
    (b) Ratification.--The do-not-call registry provision of the 
Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. 310.4(b)(1)(iii)), which was 
promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March 31, 2003, 
is ratified.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to establish a 
                         do-not-call registry.
```
#### § 303.180 Scope.

This subpart sets forth procedures for complying with application requirements relating to the foreign activities of insured state nonmember banks, U.S. activities of insured branches of foreign banks, and certain foreign mergers of insured depository institutions.
# C_2017146EN.01000801.xml

| 11.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/8

---

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement

(Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications)

Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications

(2017/C 146/08)

Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications), foresees that the EFTA States shall notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions they adopt with regard to the issuing of evidence of formal qualifications in the fields covered by Chapter III of the Act.

The Authority has the task to publish an appropriate communication indicating the titles adopted by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway for evidence of formal qualifications and, where appropriate, the body which issues the evidence of formal qualifications, the certificate which accompanies it and the corresponding professional title referred to in Annex V to the Act, points 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 respectively.

Since Norway has notified changes to titles listed, the Authority publishes the present communication in accordance with Article 21(7) of the Act.

Evidence of formal qualifications: Nurses responsible for general care

Evidence of formal qualifications: Nurses responsible for general care

Norway has notified the following changes of nurse responsible for general care already listed (Annex V, point 5.2.2, to Directive 2005/36/EC):

| Country | Evidence of formal qualifications | Body awarding the evidence of qualifications |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Norge | Vitnemål for fullført grad bachelor i sykepleie | Universitet og Høgskole |

Country

Evidence of formal qualifications

Body awarding the evidence of qualifications

Norge

Vitnemål for fullført grad bachelor i sykepleie

Universitet og Høgskole

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

llomrablc Llurt Ir’ord 

uf the PcnzI 

"Nathitq In this Af'tfcle shall be eon- 

&t-Ue~ to preTe!IIt any pcr6On f?Oct On,q@nrS; 

in t&C bUsinOS5 b@rCilJ, ik6CribCd a.6 ~POpl'i@tOr 

and UEl’lOl tobemof, PlWTidod 6UCh proprietor or 

omer 6hnll bate 6mployed in hi5 busineso tm 

oon*uot 6mno M~IOWMJ qualiCl@ user this, ahaptar, nor to Interfare with any le@ly m&stered praotlotionor of medioine or rlon1stt-y In 

the oompomnllng Of hi6 prcsori~tlons, Of to 

prevent him frw mxpplyint: his patients such 

t~odiclnc nm ho say docu: pr~por.~ 
"Any pharmacy for WI~CII n por~~lt. is 

6c;U&t "tU6t bC ‘I bUIliI fiti'? ~,hIlI%ltlCy, IY:c:j e:t(!I'- 

Cd Hit11 the state Ruord of I'halmacy, nust ?I"- 

ploy and hn~e on duty at all tines :I rnglstcred p~8ulst. and luU6t trlrra btM?U In opcrnticrn 

as s pharmacy for two years in the particular 

political subdlrld.on ln which his pennlt Is 

IwmgtlL ' 

The mnvlng clause above quoted from Article 4.540 

dDO6 nut nake the pIIJsIOiU1 a phEUm%Ci6t. 1t does not 

put into the previous portions OP the artlclo somcthln~ 

which *a6 not there bdor8. It.6 purpose raa not to make 

tho p4slclan a phannaolmt but to eraapt him flwm the roquireinont that he bu a llocnoed phamaclet. 

The Liquor Control Aot defines a bona fide pharmacy, 

and among other requiremerIts, 16 the r6qulrt%@nt that the 

pharmacy be registered, andmust hare on duty at all tjmcs 

a rcglstercd pharmacist. 

tie therofore ilnsver that a plwmaoy, under the 

doiinittin of the etatute, 16 not 6 bona lldc pharmaq unless it Is rcgletered ltlth the State Board of Pharmacy, 

ibnd unless It ha6 at sll t&es a reC;istert?d phnx%acist.. 

Whnt re hare said, we thinli, make6 It rmneceseary 

to answer your second and third lnqulry. 

xourm very truly 

I 

tie 

BY /I 

A. S. 1\011inS 

AssIstant
It has cleared ---- To OP for ROCIS/OMB Clearance - SSM SIP call (SAN 5623; RIN 2060-AR68) Pam Long to: Lisa Sutton, Krishna Viswanathan, Phil Lorang, Peter South 02/12/2013 03:16 PM Cc: Joseph-J Dougherty, Anna Wood

Thank you, Pam S. Long AQPD Regulatory Contact Regular Mail: USEPA/OAQPS/AQPD/OD (C504-01) Room # C505C RTP, NC 27711 919-541-0641 (Phone) 919-541-5509 (Fax)

----- Forwarded by Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/12/2013 03:15 PM -----
From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan

_ J.

_ Frey@omb.eop.gov> To: Paul Shriner/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, StephanieN Brown/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nicole Owens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/12/2013 03:11 PM Subject: RE: To OP for ROCIS/OMB Clearance - SSM SIP call (SAN 5623; RIN 2060-AR68)

Thanks all. I have uploaded the clean version and we have officially concluded our review under EO 12866. Thanks again, and please let me know if you have any questions.
Nathan
From: Shriner.Paul@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Shriner.Paul@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:11 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Long.Pam@epamail.epa.gov; Brown.StephanieN@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Fw: To OP for ROCIS / OMB Clearance - SSM SIP call (SAN 5623; RIN 2060- A R68)

Here is the clean version and the RLSO version, please let me know when you have confirmed these are ready for upload on our end.... 

### (See attached file: E O12866

_ SSM Petition

_ 2060- A R68

_P roposa l

_ F R N

_ 20130212.docx ) (Clean Version) 

### (See attached file: E O12866

_ SSM Petition

_ 2060- A R68

_P roposa l

_ F R N

_ Compares 11-26-12 to 2-12-13 Ver. R LSO.docx ) (RLSO Version)Thanks, Paul
Paul Shriner U.S. EPA OP/PRAD
# Official Journal C 203/19 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 203 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5819 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 203

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5819 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 203/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 203/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 203/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 203/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 203/03 | State aid — Belgium — State aid SA.33078 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 203/03

State aid — Belgium — State aid SA.33078 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3011 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3011

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, as the ``Bob Hope Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 4, 2003

Mr. Schiff (for himself and Mr. Berman) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, as the ``Bob Hope Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOB HOPE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Bob Hope Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Bob Hope 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
`Exhibit No. 21.1

                  Subsidiaries of Global Capital Partners Inc.


                                                                  Jurisdiction of
        Company                                                    Incorporation

        EBI Securities Corporation                                    Colorado

        EBI Leasing Corporation                                       Colorado

        Eastbrokers North America, Inc.                               Delaware

        MoneyZone.com                                                  Nevada

        Eastbrokers Beteiligungs AG (through June 13, 2000)            Austria

        WMP Bank AG (through June 13, 2000)                            Austria

        Eastbrokers Warszawski Dom Maklerski s.a.
        (through June 13, 2000)                                         Poland

        EB Holding, druzba za upravljanje druzb d.d.
        (through June 13, 2000)                                       Slovenia

        eBrokers d.d. (through June 13, 2000)                         Slovenia

        Global Capital Markets, LLC                                   New York

        Sutton Online, Inc.                                           New York`
EXHIBIT 21

                          TURBOSONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.




                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------

                                             State of
Name                                      Incorporation          % Ownership
----                                      -------------          -----------

Sonic Fabricating, Inc.                   Delaware                   100%

Sonic Thermal Systems, Inc.               Delaware                    80%

Euthenergy International, Inc.            Delaware                    80%

TurboSonic Canada, Inc.                   Canada (Ontario)           100%

Turbotak Technologies, Inc.               Canada (Ontario)           100%

TurboSonic, Inc.                          Canada (Ontario)           100%

Turbotak USA Inc.                         Michigan                   100%
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1996 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                1467
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3548
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                           9265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     15370
<PP&E>                                                7997
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       30020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                11644
<BONDS>                                              15078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             25059
<OTHER-SE>                                          (21761)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         30020
<SALES>                                              20129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     20129
<CGS>                                                10958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        20511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      6735 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (7885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (7885)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (7885)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.72)
<FN>
<F1>
Other expenses include a charge for acquired in-process technology of $6088 and
a charge for royalty expense of $647.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WENDALL HALL, DOC #379682, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2948

)

MS. REYNOLDS, mental health )

counselor; and CAPTAIN BUSH, )

)

Respondents. )

)

Opinion filed February 20, 2019. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Charlotte County; Lisa S. Porter,

Judge.

Wendall Hall, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kenneth V. Wilson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Respondent Captain Bush.

No appearance for remaining Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari as it relates to the portion of 

the order setting aside the clerk's default and denying Mr. Hall's motion for default 
- 2 -

judgment. See Dawkins, Inc. v. Huff, 836 So. 2d 1062, 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("[W]e 

must dismiss this appeal. An order on a motion to set aside a clerk's default is not an 

appealable, non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3). 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, such an order is also not reviewable by certiorari, 

as certiorari should not be used to circumvent the appellate rule which limits 

interlocutory review of non-final orders." (citation and footnote omitted)); Rodriguez v. 

Young Am. Corp., 717 So. 2d 621, 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) ("Because the appellants 

seek review of an order setting aside the entry of a default as opposed to a default 

judgment, we sua sponte dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction."). Having carefully 

reviewed the record as to Mr. Hall's remaining arguments, we deny the petition for writ 

of certiorari as the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law.

Dismissed in part; denied in part.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3147 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3147

To designate the Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in 
       Ogden, Utah, as the ``James V. Hansen Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2003

    Mr. Cannon (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, and Mr. Matheson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in 
       Ogden, Utah, as the ``James V. Hansen Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in Ogden, 
Utah, shall be known and designated as the ``James V. Hansen Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James V. Hansen 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32414

________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Gil E. MARTIN Senior Airman (E

- 4)
, U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 25 May 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Matthew P. Stoffel

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge and reduction to E

- 3. Sentence adjudged 2 June 2016 by SpCM convened at Edwards Air Force Base, California

. For Appellant: Major Johnathan D. Legg , USAF.
Before MAYBERRY, HARDING , and C. BROWN
, Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Martin , No. ACM S32414

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court