alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11                    Computation of Net Loss Per Share


                                         1999             1998           1997
                                       --------         --------       --------
Loss before extraordinary gain
   and income taxes                    $(16,660)        $(25,417)      $(22,142)

Provision (benefit) for
income taxes                             (2,152)           5,441             --
                                       --------         --------       --------
Net loss before
 extraordinary item                     (14,508)         (30,858)       (22,142)

Extraordinary gain, net of
tax of $2.2                              16,116               --             --

                                       --------         --------       --------
Net income(loss)                          1,608          (30,858)       (22,142)

Preferred deemed dividend                (3,043)              --             --
                                       --------         --------       --------
Net loss available to
common shareholders                    $ (1,435)        $(30,858)      $(22,142)
                                       ========         ========       ========

LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC                 $  (0.09)        $  (4.36)      $  (3.52)
                                       ========         ========       ========
Weighted average shares of
common stock outstanding                 15,489            7,081          6,299
                                       ========         ========       ========

LOSS PER SHARE - DILUTED               $  (0.09)        $  (4.36)      $  (3.52)
                                       ========         ========       ========

Weighted average shares of
common stock and common stock
equivalents outstanding                  15,489            7,081          6,299
                                       ========         ========       ========
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lou Persico, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATASCENSION INC.





2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: May 17, 2010/s/ Lou Persico[Missing Graphic Reference]

Lou Persico

President and CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, time and agenda for the first quarter meetings of the National Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

# DATES:

The meetings for the fourth quarter will be held on the following dates:

Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

These meetings will be held via conference call.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small Business Development Centers.

The purpose of these meetings is to discuss following issues pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board: 
      ( print page 52514)    
Follow-up on ASBDC Fall Conference

White Paper Issues

SBA Update

Member Roundtable

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The meeting is open to the public however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by Friday, October 16th by fax or e-mail. Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202-619-1612, Fax 202-481-0134, e-mail,                         *alanna.falcone@sba.gov.*

Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the information above.

Meaghan Burdick,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24475 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Order issued January [ -’[ ,2013

In The No. 05-12-01681-CV 

### WALTER MITCHELL, Appellant

VO TONYA CHANDLER; FRANK FORSHEE, PATRICK PARKER, AND .. --_ LETRICIA TARRANT, Appellees



### ORDER The Court GRANTS appellant’s January 14, 2013 motion for extension of time to file his 

### jurisdictional letter brief. Appellant shall file his letter brief no later than February 1, 2013. Appellees shall file any response no later than February 11, 2013.

# I Clerk, Sth District MA TZ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2998 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2998

To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt certain members of the 
  Armed Forces from the requirement to pay subsistence charges while 
                             hospitalized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 3, 2003

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to exempt certain members of the 
  Armed Forces from the requirement to pay subsistence charges while 
                             hospitalized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FROM 
              REQUIREMENT TO PAY SUBSISTENCE CHARGES WHILE 
              HOSPITALIZED.

    (a) In General.--Section 1075 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``When''; and
            (2) by striking the second sentence and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to any of the 
following:
            ``(1) An enlisted member, or former enlisted member, of a 
        uniformed service who is entitled to retired or retainer pay or 
        equivalent pay.
            ``(2) An officer or former officer of a uniformed service, 
        or an enlisted member or former enlisted member of a uniformed 
        service not described in paragraph (1), who is hospitalized 
        under section 1074 because of an injury incurred (as determined 
        under criteria prescribed by the Secretary of Defense)--
                    ``(A) as a direct result of armed conflict;
                    ``(B) while engaged in hazardous service;
                    ``(C) in the performance of duty under conditions 
                simulating war; or
                    ``(D) through an instrumentality of war.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 1075(b) of title 10, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and apply with respect to injuries incurred on or 
after that date.
                                 <all>
```
§ 303.207 Restricted activities for critically undercapitalized institutions. ( a ) *Scope.* Any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution shall submit an application to engage in certain restricted activities.
( b ) *Content of filing.* Applications to engage in any of the following activities, as set forth in sections 38(i)(2) (A) through (G) of the FDI Act, shall describe the proposed activity and explain how the activity would further the purposes of section 38 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831 *o*): ( 1 ) Enter into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business including any action with respect to which the institution is required to provide notice to the appropriate federal banking agency. Materiality will be determined on a case-by-case basis;
( 2 ) Extend credit for any highly leveraged transaction. A highly leveraged transaction means an extension of credit to or investment in a business by an insured depository institution where the financing transaction involves a buyout, acquisition, or recapitalization of an existing business and one of the following criteria is met: ( i ) The transaction results in a liabilities-to-assets leverage ratio higher than 75 percent; or
( ii ) The transaction at least doubles the subject company's liabilities and results in a liabilities-to-assets leverage ratio higher than 50 percent; or
( iii ) The transaction is designated an highly leverage transaction by a syndication agent or a federal bank regulator.
( iv ) Loans and exposures to any obligor in which the total financing package, including all obligations held by all participants is $20 million or more, or such lower level as the FDIC may establish by order on a case-by-case basis, will be excluded from this definition.
( 3 ) Amend the institution's charter or bylaws, except to the extent necessary to carry out any other requirement of any law, regulation, or order;
( 4 ) Make any material change in accounting methods;
( 5 ) Engage in any covered transaction (as defined in section 23A(b) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 371c(b));
( 6 ) Pay excessive compensation or bonuses. Part 364 of this chapter provides guidance for determining excessive compensation; or
( 7 ) Pay interest on new or renewed liabilities at a rate that would increase the institution's weighted average cost of funds to a level significantly exceeding the prevailing rates of interest on insured deposits in the institution's normal market area. Section 337.6 of this chapter (Brokered deposits) provides guidance for defining the relevant terms of this provision; however this provision does not supersede the general prohibitions contained in § 337.6.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 78 FR 55470, Sept. 10, 2013]
§ 311.6 Expedited procedure for announcing and closing certain meetings. ( a ) *Scope.* Since a majority of its meetings may properly be closed pursuant to paragraph (b)(4), (8), (9)(i), or (b)(10) of § 311.3, subsection (d)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b) allows the Corporation to use expedited procedures in closing meetings under these four subparagraphs. Absent a compelling public interest to the contrary, meetings or portions of meetings that can be expected to be closed using these procedures include, but are not limited to: Administrative enforcement proceedings under section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818); appointment of the Corporation as conservator of a depository institution, or as receiver, liquidator or liquidating agent of a closed depository institution or a depository institution in danger of closing; and certain management and liquidation activities pursuant to such appointments; possible financial assistance by the Corporation under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823); certain depository institution applications including applications to establish or move branches, applications to merge, and applications for insurance; and investigatory activity under section 10(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(c)). In announcing and closing meetings or portions of meetings under this section, the following procedures will be observed.
( b ) *Announcement.* Except to the extent that such information is exempt from disclosure under the provisions of § 311.3(b) the Corporation will make public announcement of the time, place and subject matter of the meeting and of each portion thereof at the earliest practicable time. This announcement will be published in the Federal Register if publication can be effected at least 1 day prior to the scheduled date of the meeting.
( c ) *Procedure for closing.* ( 1 ) The Corporation's General Counsel will make the public certification required by § 311.7.
( 2 ) At the beginning of a meeting or portion of a meeting to be closed under this section, a recorded vote of the Board will be taken. The Board will determine by its vote whether to proceed with the closing. If a majority of the entire Board votes to close, the meeting will be closed to public observation. Even though a meeting or portion thereof could properly be closed under this section, a majority of the entire Board may find that the public interest requires an open session and vote, reflecting the vote of each Board member, will be made available to the public.
[42 FR 14675, Mar. 16, 1977; 42 FR 16616, Mar. 29, 1977, as amended at 54 FR 38965, Sept. 22, 1989]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"), I, Lou Persico, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Lou Persico________________________

LOU PERSICO

CEO and Prin. Executive OfficerDated: June 2, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,375
<PP&E>                                         263,289
<DEPRECIATION>                               (139,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,450,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    151,139
<COMMON>                                        88,835
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,254
<SALES>                                        175,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,102
<CGS>                                           68,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,991)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 21, 2019

No. 04-19-00376-CR

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex. rel. Todd Durden, County Attorney

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On June 20, 2019, relator filed a motion for temporary relief asking this court to “issue an 

Order of Stay” as to three criminal proceedings. The motion is DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on June 21, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 10005CR, et al., styled The State of Texas v. Maria Villarreal Cervantes, 

et al., pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas. The Honorable James T. Shahan and the Honorable 

Enrique Fernandez are the respondents.
42670.

#### POSEY v. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Vassie Posey brought this suit to recover as the alleged beneficiary of a life insurance contract. The amended petition shows that on April 10, 1964, W. G. Newbern ifiade application in writing to defendant for a policy of group life insurance covering the applicant’s employees. The application provided: “It is requested that this insurance shall be effective on 4-10 1964. . . It is agreed that this application is subject to the approval of the Gulf Life Insurance Company at its home office in Jacksonville, Florida, and that nothing contained herein shall be binding upon said company until this application has been so approved.” Newbern paid the first premium on the policy applied for, and defendant’s soliciting agent “assured W. G. Newbern . . . *532that the coverage was immediately effective with reference to his employees. . .” Leonard Posey, plaintiff’s decedent and one of the employees, died on April 27, 1964, before defendant took any action on the application. Defendant thereafter rejected the application. *Held:*

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Submitted- March 7, 1967

Decided April 4, 1967.

*Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Wayne W. Gammon,*for appellee.

The application in this case was a mere offer, and the defendant company was free to accept or reject it entirely. *Boswell v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.,*197 Ga. 269, 272 (29 SE2d 71). There is is no “binding receipt” involved, nor does the application itself contain any language purporting to effect immediate coverage upon advance payment of the premium. The company is not liable on the proposed policy simply because it accepted the premium in advance on the supposition that the policy would be issued. *McGlothin v. U. S. &c. Cas. Co.,*36 Ga. App. 325 (3) (136 SE 535). The soliciting agent in this case had no authority to bind the underwriting department of the company, whose duty it was to evaluate applications and risks. *Cotton States Life Ins. Co. v. Scurry,*50 Ga. 48. See also *Code Ann.*§ 56-2420 (4). In the face of the plain and unambiguous language of the application stating “that this application is subject to the approval of the . . . company at its home office . . . and that nothing contained herein shall be binding upon said company until this application has been so approved,” a mere verbal assurance by the agent of the company to the applicant that the coverage was immediately effective- did not constitute a contract of insurance upon which an action could be maintained. *Fowler v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co.,*100 Ga. 330, 333 (28 SE 398); *Sasser v. Coastal States Life Ins. Co.,*113 Ga. App. 17, 21 (147 SE2d 5).

The trial court did not err in sustaining defendant’s renewed general demurrer to the amended petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*