p. 1 

# OAR Box 1706 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 45 ) IV-E- 6 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 10/8/2008 10:25:09 AM Sheet 45 of 142P. 2



## - 4 200 3 \\l-E~o(>

. Decembe r

30 , 200 2 • Subject : Note s fromDecembe r 27 , 200 2 teleconferenc e with AC C o n propose dOL D MAC T From : K C Hustvedt , Grou p Leader , WCP G To : Projec t

file s I me t wit h severa l AC C member s (se e attache dlist ) ove r th e phon e t o discus s th e Novembe r 200 2 Outstandin g Issue s lis t fromAC C o n th e propose dOL D MAC T standard . I explaine dt o the m tha t al l I coul dspea

k t o wer e projec t

teamrecommendation s becaus e w e hav e not briefe dEP A managemen t

an dw e hav e no t

ha ddetaile ddiscussio n o n th e issue s with ou r Offic e o f Genera l Counsel . Th e followin g summarize s th e discussion : 1 . Overlap - W e pla n t o us e th e standar dstandard s a s muc h a s possibl e i n th e final rule . 2 . OL D Applicability/Affecte d Sourc e Diagra man dApplicability an dAffecte dSourc e - AC C believe s th e throughpu t

applicability cutof

f shoul db e base do n th e affecte dsourc e an dtha t onl y leakin g equipmen t

tha t are associate dwith affecte dstorag e o r loadin g rack s shoul db e subjec t t o th e requirements . The y mak e several othe r recommendation s o n what shoul db e include d an dexclude dfro mth e affecte dsource . W e wil l revie w thei r recommendation s an dclarif y th e basi s for th e throughpu t

cutof f i n th e fina

l rule , includin g ho w w e wil l deal with th e incomin g loadin g rack s whic h wer e propose dt o b e no t part ofth e affecte dsource . 3 . Emissio n Limitation s an dWor k Practic e Standard s - AC C woul dlik e u s t o alway s refer to Tabl e 1 HA P rathe r

tha n genericall y referrin g t o HAP . I explaine dtha t I though t tha t was okay but I woul dhav e t o check . AC C woul dlike u s t o allo w vapo r balancin g for

loadin g rack s a s w e hav e i n severa l othe r

rules . I explaine dtha t

i t was ou r inten t t o b e consisten t

with othe r rule s s o w e wil l ad dthi s option . AC C woul dlike portabl e tank s (100 0 gallon s an dsmaller ) t o b e exclude dfro mth e carg o tan k standards . I explaine dtha t I amno t familia r with thi s issue . The y referre dm e t o thei r

detaile dcomment s for

mor e explanation . 4 . Testing . Initia l an dContinuou s Complianc e Requirement s - AC C woul dlik e t o us e mor e appropriat e method s for

makin g th e HA P determinations . I agree dtha t w e woul dexpan dth e lis t o f methods . I als o sai dI woul dchec k i n o n EMC' s lis t

o f preferre dtes t

method s for

eac h ofth e HA P t o se e i f

ther e wa s apublishe dlis t o f HAP-specifi c tes t

method s tha t

w e coul d poin t to . AC C woul dals o lik e t o us e proces s knowledg e t o demonstrat e tha t liquid s ar e les s tha n th e 5 % HA P cutoff

. I agree dtha t

w e can mak e tha t

a n optio n bu t

tha t th e rul e woul dnee d t o b e clear

tha t i f ther e wa s adisagreemen t a s t o th e HA P conten t

o f astream , testin g woul d nee dt o b e performe dt o determin e th e HA P content . AC C replie dtha t the y woul dagre e t o that . AC C als o requeste dsignifican t reduction s i n th e record s an dreport s require db y th e rule . I sai dI woul drevie w th e requirements .P. 3



### Implementatio n - AC C wouldlik e fo r u s t o allo w complianc e wit

h existin g rule s suc

h as Par t 6 0 subpar t K b fo r tank s t o be use dt o replac e complianc e wit

h OL D MACT . I explaine d tha

t we allo w othe r rule s t o poin t t o MAC T a s a n alternative , bu

t tha t we didnot

point fro mMAC T t o othe r rules . The

y saidwha t the y wer e recommending was fro

mthe HO N an dothe r rules . I saidI wouldloo

k int o it .