alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021075EN.01000401.xml

| 4.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/4

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 75/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25 November 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85853 |
| Decision No | 137/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services |
| Legal basis | The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensation for loss incurred by Covid-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 100 million |
| Intensity | 80 % June, 60 % in July and August |
| Duration | 1.6.2020 – 31.8.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Land and sea transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Railway Directorate |
| Jernbanedirektoratet |
| Postboks 16 Sentrum |
| N-0101 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

25 November 2020

Case No

85853

Decision No

137/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services

Legal basis

The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensation for loss incurred by Covid-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 100 million

Intensity

80 % June, 60 % in July and August

Duration

1.6.2020 – 31.8.2020

Economic sectors

Land and sea transport

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Railway Directorate

Jernbanedirektoratet

Postboks 16 Sentrum

N-0101 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2011169EN.01001201.xml

| 9.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/12

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 169/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 2 March 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68799 |
| Decision number | : | 56/2011/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Guarantee scheme for the purchase of electric power on long-term contracts |
| Legal basis | : | Prop. 1 S (2009-2010) (Budget proposal from the Government to the Parliament for the fiscal year 2010) and subsequent decision from the Norwegian Parliament of 14 December 2009 in Innst. 8 S (2009-2010) — Prop. 125 S (2009-2010) (Revised budget proposal from the Government to the Parliament for the fiscal year 2010) and subsequent decision from the Norwegian Parliament of 11 June 2010 in Innst. 350 S (2009-2010) |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | : | Guarantee |
| Budget | : | — |
| Intensity | : | 80 % maximum |
| Duration | : | — |
| Economic sectors | : | Electro-intensive industries |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Royal Ministry of Trade and Industry |
| Einar Gerhardsens plass 1 |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

2 March 2011

Case number

:

68799

Decision number

:

56/2011/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Guarantee scheme for the purchase of electric power on long-term contracts

Legal basis

:

Prop. 1 S (2009-2010) (Budget proposal from the Government to the Parliament for the fiscal year 2010) and subsequent decision from the Norwegian Parliament of 14 December 2009 in Innst. 8 S (2009-2010) — Prop. 125 S (2009-2010) (Revised budget proposal from the Government to the Parliament for the fiscal year 2010) and subsequent decision from the Norwegian Parliament of 11 June 2010 in Innst. 350 S (2009-2010)

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

:

Sectoral development

Form of aid

:

Guarantee

Budget

:

—

Intensity

:

80 % maximum

Duration

:

—

Economic sectors

:

Electro-intensive industries

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Royal Ministry of Trade and Industry

Einar Gerhardsens plass 1

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               8,607
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          750
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    29,225
<PP&E>                                             140,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                       9,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     176,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,179
<BONDS>                                             87,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               13,897
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                40
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       176,591
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    48,485
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       60,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (27,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (27,966)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (27,966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (7.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (7.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014088EN.01001601.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 6 December 2013

in Case E-17/13

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2009/44/EC — Failure to implement)

2014/C 88/13

In Case E-17/13, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of all measures necessary to implement Article 2 of the Act referred to at point 16b, first indent, of Annex IX and point 4, first indent, of Annex XII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, that is Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 amending Directive 98/26/EC on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims, as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 6 December 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 16b, first indent, of Annex IX and point 4, first indent, of Annex XII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 amending Directive 98/26/EC on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to implement Article 2 of the Act within the time prescribed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 16b, first indent, of Annex IX and point 4, first indent, of Annex XII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 amending Directive 98/26/EC on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to implement Article 2 of the Act within the time prescribed;

| 2. | orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
The information contained in this file set includes reports from NMED on the PNM

- S an Juan Generating

Station (SJGS) BART determination and SJGS emission limits.

File List:
03312008Final_BART_Modeling_Response_with_Attachments_0331.pdf 2005_5

- 10_San_Juan_final_decree_as_entered.pdf AppxA_AttachmentA_BARTModelingResults.pdf AppxA_NM_SJGS_NOxBARTDetermination_06212010.pdf Boiler Construction Dates.pdf COMPLETE Final SO3 Removal Report 031609.pdf Facility

- Wide Impact.xls PNMBARTReport_AppendixO

- 1.pdf Permit

- Final (P062R1M1).pdf
§ 308.182 Board of Directors action. ( a ) *Exceptions to recommended decision.* Within 20 days after service of the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order, the applicant or counsel for the FDIC may file with the Administrative Officer written exceptions thereto. A supporting brief may also be filed.
( b ) *Decision of Board of Directors.* The Board of Directors shall render its decision within 60 days after the matter is submitted to it by the Administrative Officer. The Administrative Officer shall furnish copies of the decision and order of the Board of Directors to the parties. Judicial review of the decision and order may be obtained as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
[86 FR 2251, Jan. 12, 2021]
# C_2016347EN.01003501.xml

| 22.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/35

---

Action brought on 21 June 2016 by Míla ehf. against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-7/16)

(2016/C 347/07)

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 21 June 2016 by Míla ehf., represented by Espen Bakken, attorney at law and Atle Erling Lunder, attorney at law, Arntzen de Besche Advokatfirma AS, Bygdøy allé 2, 0204 Oslo, Norway.

The Applicant requests the EFTA Court to:

| 1. | Declare void Articles 1 and 2 of ESA Decision 061/16/COL; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare void Articles 1 and 2 of ESA Decision 061/16/COL;

| 2. | Order the Authority to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Authority to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | The Applicant seeks the annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 061/16/COL of 16 March 2016. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Applicant seeks the annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 061/16/COL of 16 March 2016.

| — | As a consequence of the EFTA Court's judgment in Case E-1/13, the EFTA Surveillance Authority initiated a formal investigation procedure to look into the lease by the Defence Agency of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Iceland with Og fjarskipti of 1 February 2010, for the use and operation of an optical fibre. The investigation was concluded with Decision No 061/16/COL where the EFTA Surveillance Authority found that the lease did not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

As a consequence of the EFTA Court's judgment in Case E-1/13, the EFTA Surveillance Authority initiated a formal investigation procedure to look into the lease by the Defence Agency of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Iceland with Og fjarskipti of 1 February 2010, for the use and operation of an optical fibre. The investigation was concluded with Decision No 061/16/COL where the EFTA Surveillance Authority found that the lease did not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.

| — | The Applicant claims that the contested Decision rests upon a misapplication of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Applicant claims that the contested Decision rests upon a misapplication of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Datascension,
Inc. (the "Company") for  the  quarter  ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Kincer, President and Chief Executive Officer  and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
{section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section}  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
	of  15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
	78o(d)); and

	(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all
	material respects, the financial condition and  results  of  operations
	of the Company.


                                  /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                  ----------------------
                                  D. Scott Kincer
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                  and Principal Financial Officer

May 15, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1539966
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2850000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4034900
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         6833577
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           6883000
<LOANS>                                       53017352
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (276300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                71719249
<DEPOSITS>                                    54910181
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5000000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1453710
<LONG-TERM>                                    4200526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2631
<OTHER-SE>                                     6152201
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                71719249
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4177760
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1006631
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5184391
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2297157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2880223
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2304168
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    35414
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2080877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 577466
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      577466
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    351201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.00
<LOANS-NON>                                     276300
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                305900
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    65014
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               276300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            276300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 11 - 00226 - CV

IN RE GRAND LODGE OF TEXAS RELATOR

------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ We have considered “ Relator’ s Motion To Dismiss Petitio n For Writ Of
Mandamus .” It is the court = s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the petition

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8

. Further, we lift our June 24, 2011 stay of Respondent the Honorable Pat Ferchill’s verbal June 22, 2011 order requiring relator to produce documents by June 23, 2011, and Respondent the Honorable Lin Morrisett’s May 26, 2011 order requiring relator to produce documents and/or a privilege log by June 2, 2011, in cause number 2005

- 0000284

- 1

- 2, styled Estate of T J Gardner,

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Deceased , pending in Probate Court No. 2 of Tarrant County, Texas

. “Relator’s Emergency Motion For Enforcement Of Stay” and r eal parties in interest’s

“ Conditional Motion to Determine no Violation of Court’ s Stay Order ” are denied
as moot.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 27 , 2011
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrow Resources
      Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Principal Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Peter FrugonePeter
                FrugoneChief
                Financial Officer








Date: November
      14, 2007.
§ 23.22 Transition rule. ( a ) *Exclusion.* A Section 24(Seventh) Lease entered into prior to June 12, 1979, may continue to be administered in accordance with the lease terms in effect as of that date. For purposes of applying the lending limits and the restrictions on transactions with affiliates described in § 23.6, however, a national bank that enters into a new extension of credit to a customer, including a lease, on or after June 12, 1979, shall include all outstanding leases regardless of the date on which they were made.
( b ) *Renewal of non-conforming leases.* A national bank may renew a Section 24(Seventh) Lease that was entered into prior to June 12, 1979, and that is not a conforming lease only if the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) The bank entered into the Section 24(Seventh) Lease in good faith;
( 2 ) The expiring lease contains a binding agreement requiring that the bank renew the lease at the lessee's option, and the bank cannot reasonably avoid its commitment to do so; and
( 3 ) The bank determines in good faith, and demonstrates by appropriate documentation, that renewal of the lease is necessary to avoid financial loss and to recover its investment in, and its cost of financing, the leased property.
#### Shaler *&*Hall Quarry Co. *v.*Brewster.

Death of respondent made to appear by affidavit.

Per Curiam.

It appears by affidavit, on moving the case for argument, that the suit has abated by the death of the respondent. The cause should stand over to the next term without prejudice, and with leave to move for the substitution of the parties in interest.
#### § 1815.113 Public involvement.

All information collected by the Fund pursuant to this part shall be available to the public consistent with the CEQ regulations. Interested persons may obtain information concerning any pending EIS or any other element of the environmental review process of the Fund by contacting the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., room 5116, Washington, DC 20220, or such other contact entity designated by the Fund.