alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1081.213 Rulings on dispositive motions. ( a ) *Ruling by Director or hearing officer.* The Director will rule on a dispositive motion, refer the motion to the hearing officer, or rule on the motion in part and refer it in part.
( b ) *Timing of ruling.* If the Director rules on the motion, the Director must do so within 42 days following the expiration of the time for filing all responses and replies, unless there is good cause to extend the deadline. If the Director refers the motion to the hearing officer, the Director may set a deadline for the hearing officer to rule.
( c ) *Oral argument.* At the request of any party or on the Director or hearing officer's own motion, the Director or hearing officer (as applicable) may hear oral argument on a dispositive motion.
( d ) *Types of rulings* — ( 1 ) *Granting motion as to all claims and relief.* If the Director or hearing officer (as applicable) determines that dismissal or summary disposition is warranted as to all claims and relief, then (as applicable) the Director will issue a final decision and order or the hearing officer will issue preliminary findings and conclusions.
( 2 ) *Granting motion as to some claims or relief.* If the Director or hearing officer (as applicable) determines that dismissal or summary disposition is warranted as to some issues, but not all claims and relief, the Director or hearing officer will issue an order that directs further proceedings. Where the dispositive motion is a motion for summary disposition, the order will specify the facts that appear without substantial controversy. The facts so specified are be deemed established.
( 3 ) *Denial of motion.* If the Director or hearing officer (as applicable) determines that dismissal or summary disposition is not warranted, the Director or hearing officer may make a ruling denying the motion. If it appears that a party, for good cause shown, cannot present by affidavit, prior to hearing, facts essential to justify opposition to a motion for summary disposition, the Director or hearing officer must deny or defer the motion, or do so in relevant part.
# C_2019315EN.01000601.xml

| 19.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 May 2019

in Case E-5/18

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2013/11/EU)

(2019/C 315/07)

In Case E-5/18, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7d, 7f and 7k of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed, or in any event, by failing to inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 14 May 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7d, 7f and 7k of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7d, 7f and 7k of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3022 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3022

  To protect children's health by ensuring that chickens and chicken 
products purchased for national school nutrition programs have not been 
            fed or administered fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect children's health by ensuring that chickens and chicken 
products purchased for national school nutrition programs have not been 
            fed or administered fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``School Nutrition Antibiotic 
Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE PURCHASE OF CHICKENS AND CHICKEN PRODUCTS 
              FED OR ADMINISTERED FLUOROQUINOLONES.

    (a) School Lunch and Breakfast Programs.--Section 14(d) of the 
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1762a(d)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding after paragraph (5) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(6) ensure that chickens and chicken products purchased 
        for such programs have not been fed or administered a 
        fluoroquinolone.''.
    (b) Summer Food Service Program for Children.--Section 13 of the 
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(r) In providing assistance under this section, the Secretary 
shall establish procedures which will ensure that chickens and chicken 
products purchased for such programs have not been fed or administered 
a fluoroquinolone.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016338EN.01000901.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/9

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(2016/C 338/11)

| Member State | Iceland |
| --- | --- |
| Route(s) concerned | Akureyri–Þórshöfn–Vopnafjörður–Akureyri
  Akureyri–Grímsey–Akureyri
  Reykjavík–Bíldudalur–Reykjavík
  Reykjavík–Gjögur–Reykjavík
  Reykjavík–Höfn í Hornafirði–Reykjavík |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 April 2017–31 March 2021 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 60 days from the publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained free of charge | Ríkiskaup |
| Borgartúni 7 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |
| Tel. +354 5301400 |
| Fax +354 5301414 |
| Email: rikiskaup@rikiskaup.is |
| Web: www.rikiskaup.is |

Member State

Iceland

Route(s) concerned

Akureyri–Þórshöfn–Vopnafjörður–Akureyri

Akureyri–Grímsey–Akureyri

Reykjavík–Bíldudalur–Reykjavík

Reykjavík–Gjögur–Reykjavík

Reykjavík–Höfn í Hornafirði–Reykjavík

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2017–31 March 2021

Deadline for submission of tenders

60 days from the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained free of charge

Ríkiskaup

Borgartúni 7

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

Tel. +354 5301400

Fax +354 5301414

Email: rikiskaup@rikiskaup.is

Web: www.rikiskaup.is

---
#### Michael Neglia et al., Appellants, *v.*Theodore V. Lielouka, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

Herman A. Brand, for appellants.

Don R. Almy, for respondent.

*708
      *Per Curiam.*

As the evidence showed that defendant agreed to 'fix the roof if plaintiffs “ stayed ”, and that plaintiffs stayed, but defendant failed to fix the roof within a reasonable time, and that by this fault of the defendant the plaintiffs were damaged as claimed, the complaint should not have been dismissed.

As it does not appear that the plaintiffs had concluded their case on any question, except that of defendant’s negligence, at the time of the dismissal, it is not necessary to consider the question of contributory negligence.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.'
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 23 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM R. YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-1340

(D.C. 94-CR-169-1)

(District of Colorado)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

 

Before TACHA , HENRY , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

 

On this appeal, William R. Young contended that the district court erred in

calculating his sentence and violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. 

While the appeal was pending, however, Mr. Young died. “‘[D]eath pending

direct review of a criminal conviction abates not only the appeal but also all

proceedings had in the prosecution from its inception.’” United States v. Davis ,
2

953 F.2d 1482, 1486 (10th Cir. 1992) (quoting Durham v. United States , 401

U.S. 481, 483 (1971) (per curiam), overruled on other grounds , Dove v. United

States , 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam)). Accordingly, the case is remanded to

the district court with directions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the

underlying indictment. See id.

Entered for the Court,

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52465-52466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of 
Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended, 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant 
Alexium Ltd, a business entity of Cyprus, having a place of business at 
2 Sophouli Street, Chanteclair House, 1096-Nicosia, Cyprus, Europe, an 
exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air Force has 
in: U.S. Patent Application No. 12/543,576 filed August 19, 2009, 
entitled

[[Page 52466]]

``Coatings for Disease Control'' by Jeffrey R. Owens, as well as other 
related know how. A license for this patent and related know how will 
be granted unless a written objection is filed within fifteen (15) days 
from the date of publication of this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey R. Moore, Attorney, Air Force 
Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, Building 11, Room E4, 2240 B 
Street, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109. Telephone: (937) 904-5088; 
Facsimile (937) 255-3733.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24587 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA multiple linear regression analysis of hot corrosion attack on a series of nickel base turbine alloysMultiple linear regression analysis was used to determine an equation for estimating hot corrosion attack for a series of Ni base cast turbine alloys. The U transform (i.e., 1/sin (% A/100) to the 1/2) was shown to give the best estimate of the dependent variable, y. A complete second degree equation is described for the centered" weight chemistries for the elements Cr, Al, Ti, Mo, W, Cb, Ta, and Co. In addition linear terms for the minor elements C, B, and Zr were added for a basic 47 term equation. The best reduced equation was determined by the stepwise selection method with essentially 13 terms. The Cr term was found to be the most important accounting for 60 percent of the explained variability hot corrosion attack.Document ID19850022971Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBarrett, C. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-87020NAS 1.15:87020E-2491Accession Number85N31284Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-62Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850022971.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2020185EN.01000301.xml

| 4.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/3

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 185/03)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v. |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 January 2021 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Ministry of Transport
  PO Box 8010 Dep
  0030 Oslo
  NORWAY
  Tel. +47 22248353
  postmottak@sd.dep.no
  https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v.

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 January 2021

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Ministry of Transport

PO Box 8010 Dep

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22248353

postmottak@sd.dep.no

https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3126

To provide that no court or judge shall dismiss any part of the Constitution 

or Bill of Rights as a legal defense in court. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide that no court or judge shall dismiss any part 

of the Constitution or Bill of Rights as a legal defense 

in court.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That no court or judge shall dismiss any part of the Con4 stitution or Bill of Rights as a legal defense in court.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM HELMSTAR
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES'  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM 6
MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,664,257
<SECURITIES>                                36,675,815
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      46,595,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                 350,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,385,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     72,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,483,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,385,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,631,877
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,760,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,705,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (847,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (847,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40739

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE VILLAFRANCA-CABRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-78-1

--------------------

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Villafranca-Cabrera appeals his 41-month sentence

following his plea of guilty to a charge of illegal re-entry to

the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Villafranca-Cabrera asserts that the felony conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been

alleged in the indictment. He acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

226-27 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme
No. 00-40739 

-2-

Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 

2362-63 (2000). Villafranca-Cabrera’s argument is foreclosed. 

See Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020374EN.01004701.xml

| 5.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/47

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 16 July 2020

in Case E-8/19

Scanteam AS v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

(Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Definition of ‘contracting authority’ – Foreign mission of an EFTA State – Applicability of EEA law – Article 126 EEA – Geographic scope of the EEA Agreement)

(2020/C 374/09)

In Case E-8/19, Scanteam AS v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Complaints Board for Public Procurement (Klagenemnda for offentlige anskaffelser) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as adapted to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 16 July 2020, the operative part of which is as follows:

Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement is applicable to a procurement procedure undertaken by a foreign mission of an EFTA State in a third country, if the procurement is sufficiently closely linked to the EEA.

---
Exhibit 10.1
 
 Amendment CS Acquisition Danielle Acquisition Chaus Lender
  Financing Agreement
   Definitions
 Amendments to Financing Agreement
  Total Liabilities minus
 Condition of Effectiveness




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
     Effect on the Financing Agreement
 Section 2
   Effect and Construction of Agreement
   2




---



##### 



Presumptions
 Entire Agreement
 Further Assurances
 Benefit of Agreement
 Severability
 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue forum non conveniens
 3




---



##### 



Waiver of Jury Trial
 Counterparts; Facsimile
 Survival
 Amendment
 Headings
 [Signature page follows this page]
 4




---



##### 



THE CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 
INC., as LenderBy:
    /s/ Geoffrey GoldsteinName:
    Geoffrey GoldsteinTitle:
    Vice PresidentBERNARD CHAUS, INC.By:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerCYNTHIA STEFFE ACQUISITION, LLCBy:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerS.L. DANIELLE ACQUISITION, LLCBy:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



BERNARD CHAUS INTERNATIONAL (HONG
KONG), INC.By:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerBERNARD CHAUS INTERNATIONAL 
(KOREA), INCBy:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerBERNARD CHAUS INTERNATIONAL 
(TAIWAN), INCBy:
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName:
    Barton HeminoverTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer