alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 272
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 272 appear at 86 FR 11623, Feb. 26, 2021.

§ 272.4 Committee actions. ( a ) *Actions at meetings.* Actions are taken at meetings of the Committee except as described below.
( b ) *Actions between meetings.* Special circumstances may make it desirable in the public interest for Committee members to consider an action to modify an outstanding Committee authorization or directive at a time when it is not feasible to call a meeting. Whenever, in the judgment of the Chair, such circumstances have arisen, the relevant information and recommendations for action are transmitted to the members by the Secretary, and the members communicate their votes to the Secretary. If the action is approved by a majority of the members, advice to that effect is promptly given by the Secretary to the members of the Committee and to the Reserve bank selected to execute transactions for the System Open Market Account. All communications of recommended actions and votes under this paragraph shall be in writing, by telephone, or electronic means; if the communication is made orally, the Secretary shall cause a written record to be made without delay. An action taken between meetings has the force and effect of an action at a meeting: *Provided, however,* That if a meeting is held before the execution of any operations pursuant to the action, the action is null and void unless it is ratified and confirmed by the Committee at such meeting.
( c ) *Delegations of authority.* In special circumstances, the Committee may delegate authority to take an action, subject to such instructions or guidelines as the Committee deems proper. Such delegations of authority may be made to the Chair; to a subcommittee consisting of the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Committee and the Vice Chair of the Board (or in the absence of the Chair or of the Vice Chair of the Board the members of the Board designated by the Chair as alternates, and in the absence of the Vice Chair of the Committee the alternate for the Vice Chair); or to any other member or members of the Committee. An action taken pursuant to such a delegation of authority has the force and effect of an action taken by the Committee.
( d ) *Technical changes to Committee rules.* The Secretary of the Committee (or the acting secretary) is authorized to make technical corrections, such as spelling, grammar, construction, and organization (including removal of obsolete provisions and references), to the Committee's rules, regulations, and orders and other records of Committee action but only with the concurrence of the Committee's General Counsel.
( e ) *Effective date.* Committee action ordinarily is made effective as of the time it is taken because the nature of the subject matter and the action taken is such that the public interest and the proper discharge of the Committee's responsibilities so require. Occasionally, however, the Committee may specify that an action is to be effective at some different time.
[38 FR 2754, Jan. 30, 1973, as amended at 65 FR 6320, Feb. 9, 2000; 70 FR 7841, Feb. 16, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,999,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,155,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   637,000
<INVENTORY>                                 34,978,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           100,326,000
<PP&E>                                      61,516,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,037,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             267,669,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       95,083,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 24,323,000
<COMMON>                                       165,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  88,472,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               267,669,000
<SALES>                                    157,346,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           157,346,000
<CGS>                                      141,218,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              141,218,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,850,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,565,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,124,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   598,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            526,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 208,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   362,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39




[FLEET LETTERHEAD]




August 30, 1996



Mr. Thomas A. St. Germain
Chief Financial Officer
Summa Four, Inc.
25 Sundial Avenue
Manchester, NH 03103



Dear Tom:

Reference is hereby made to the Letter Agreement (the "Agreement") executed by
and between Summa Four, Inc. and Fleet National Bank (as successor to Fleet Bank
of Massachusetts, N.A.) as of October 15, 1992 and amended as of July 28, 1993,
August 2, 1994 and August 24, 1995. We are pleased to inform you that we have
approved an extension of the Expiration Date from September 1, 1996 to September
1, 1997. Nothing herein shall be deemed to constitute a waiver, release or
amendment of any other terms of the agreement.

The Borrower represents and warrants that the execution of this amendment has
been duly authorized by the Borrower by all necessary corporate and other action
and that the execution will not conflict with, violate the provisions of, or
cause a default or constitute an event which, with the passage of time or giving
of notice or both, could cause a default on the part of the Borrower under its
charter documents or by-laws or under any contract, agreement, law, rule, order,
ordinance, franchise, instrument or other document, or result in the imposition
of any lien or encumbrance on any property or asset of the Borrower.

The Borrower further represents that this agreement and the attached Promissory
Note each represent legal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower,
enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with their respective terms. In
addition, the statements, representations and warranties made in the Agreement
continue to be correct as of the date hereof and the Borrower is in compliance
with all terms of the Agreement. Except as expressly affected hereby, the
Agreement remains in full force and effect as heretofore.




<PAGE>   2

Tom, we are pleased to extend the Agreement and look forward to continuing our
relationship with Summa Four. Please sign below and execute the attached note to
evidence your acceptance of this amendment.


Sincerely,



/s/ Thomas W. Davies
----------------------------
Thomas W. Davies
Vice President
High Technology Group


Agreed and Accepted: /s/ Thomas A. St. Germain                        9/1/96
                     --------------------------------              ------------
                 by: Thomas A. St. Germain                             date:
              title: CFO, SVP
# C_2015201EN.01000601.xml

| 18.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 28 January 2015

in Case E-12/14

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

v

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2009/125/EC on ecodesign requirements for energy-related products — Failure to implement)

(2015/C 201/06)

In Case E-12/14, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of all measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 6 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 and by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 67/2011 of 1 July 2011, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and Article 7 EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 28 January 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 6 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 and by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 67/2011 of 1 July 2011, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 6 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 and by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 67/2011 of 1 July 2011, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
# C_2020226EN.01001101.xml

| 9.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/11

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 226/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 2 April 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85041 |
| Decision No | 031/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Whole territory of Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Amendment to COVID-19 Guarantee scheme for SMEs (inclusion of large undertakings) |
| Legal basis | Regulation on amendments to Regulation 27 March 2020 No 490 to the Act on a Government guarantee scheme for SMEs |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensure access to liquidity for large undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended) |
| Duration | 26 March 2020 – 1 June 2020 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency
  Pb 1763 Vika
  N-0122 Oslo
  NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

2 April 2020

Case No

85041

Decision No

031/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Whole territory of Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Amendment to COVID-19 Guarantee scheme for SMEs (inclusion of large undertakings)

Legal basis

Regulation on amendments to Regulation 27 March 2020 No 490 to the Act on a Government guarantee scheme for SMEs

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensure access to liquidity for large undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended)

Duration

26 March 2020 – 1 June 2020

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency

Pb 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2020374EN.01004401.xml

| 5.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/44

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 16 July 2020

in Case E-7/19

Tak – Malbik ehf. v the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Þróttur ehf.

(Public Procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public works contract – Public service contract)

(2020/C 374/07)

In Case E-7/19, Tak – Malbik ehf. v the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Þróttur ehf – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Public Procurement Complaints Committee (Kærunefnd útboðsmála) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, and in particular points (6), (7) and (9) of Article 2(1) thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen, and Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 16 July 2020, the operative part of which is as follows:

In circumstances such as those of the case in the main proceedings, there is no public works contract within the meaning of point (6) of Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. A public contract which has as its object the provision of services other than those referred to in point (6) of Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU, constitutes a public service contract within the meaning of point (9) of Article 2(1) thereof.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3114 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3114

To provide that adjustments in rates of pay for Members of Congress may 
 not exceed any cost-of-living increases in benefits under title II of 
                        the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2003

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that adjustments in rates of pay for Members of Congress may 
 not exceed any cost-of-living increases in benefits under title II of 
                        the Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Limitation.--Subparagraph (B) of section 601(a)(2) of the 
Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(B) In no event shall the percentage adjustment taking effect 
under subparagraph (A) in any calendar year (before rounding), in any 
rate of pay, exceed the lesser of--
            ``(i) the percentage adjustment taking effect in such 
        calendar year under section 5303 of title 5, United States 
        Code, in the rates of pay under the General Schedule; or
            ``(ii) the percentage by which benefits under title II of 
        the Social Security Act are increased (if at all) effective 
        December 1st of the preceding calendar year--
                    ``(I) as a result of a determination under section 
                215(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)); or
                    ``(II) pursuant to a law providing a general 
                benefit increase under such title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect on January 1, 2004, 
and shall apply with respect to any pay adjustment taking effect on or 
after that date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 8
 Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP

Nashville City Center
511 Union Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, Tennessee 37219-8966
(615) 244-6380
Fax: (615) 244-6804
www.wallerlaw.com
    
    1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1400
Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2623
(205) 214-6380
  
 Re:
    
    Issuance and sale of up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Healthcare
Realty Trust Incorporated




---



##### 



(1)
    
    95% gross income test for the year; and(2)
    
    75% gross income test for the year.
  (1)
    
    75% asset test at the end of each quarter;(2)
    
    25% asset test at the end of each quarter;(3)
    
    10% asset test at the end of each quarter; and(4)
    
    5% asset test at the end of each quarter.




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8967-6]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed administrative settlement concerning Doughty's Treating Plant 
Site, LaSalle Parish, Louisiana.
    The settlement requires the Town of Jena, settling party to pay a 
total of $18,500, plus interest as payment of response costs to the 
Hazardous Substances Superfund.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 9, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Kenneth Talton, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-7475. Comments 
should reference the Doughty's Treating Plant Site, Jena, LaSalle 
Parish, Louisiana, and EPA Docket Number 06-03-09, and should be 
addressed to Kenneth Talton at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Salinas, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-8063.

    Dated: September 29, 2009.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-24465 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# C_2020365EN.01000501.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/5

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 365/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85350 |
| Decision No | 091/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Amendments and prolongation of the compensation scheme for the cancellation or postponement of cultural events |
| Legal basis | The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for organisers in the culture sector for cancellations, closings or postponements of events as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak with an amendment |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To compensate for eligible losses caused by the cancellation, partial cancellation or postponement of cultural events to combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | Increase of NOK 950 million (total budget of the scheme 1,25 billion) |
| Duration | Until 30 September |
| Economic sectors | Culture |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Arts Council Norway |
| Postboks 4808 Nydalen |
| 0422 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

16 July 2020

Case No

85350

Decision No

091/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Amendments and prolongation of the compensation scheme for the cancellation or postponement of cultural events

Legal basis

The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for organisers in the culture sector for cancellations, closings or postponements of events as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak with an amendment

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To compensate for eligible losses caused by the cancellation, partial cancellation or postponement of cultural events to combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

Increase of NOK 950 million (total budget of the scheme 1,25 billion)

Duration

Until 30 September

Economic sectors

Culture

Name and address of the granting authority

Arts Council Norway

Postboks 4808 Nydalen

0422 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2965

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes 

imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. POMEROY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer 

all excise taxes imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway 

Trust Fund, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Highway Trust Fund 

5 Recovery Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALL ALCOHOL FUELS TAXES TRANSFERRED TO 

7 HIGHWAY TRUST FUND. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9503(b)(4) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain taxes not trans10 ferred to Highway Trust Fund) is amended—
2

•HR 2965 IH 

1 (1) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

2 (C), 

3 (2) by striking the comma at the end of sub4 paragraph (D)(iii) and inserting a period, and 

5 (3) by striking subparagraphs (E) and (F). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxes received in the Treasury 

8 after September 30, 2003.

Æ