alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   [EXHIBIT 3.2]

                          Articles of Amendment to the
                          Articles of Incorporation of
             Scientific NRG, Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation

         By unanimous resolution of the board of directors and by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares
entitled to vote, Scientific NRG, Incorporated hereby amends its Articles of
Incorporation as follows:

         RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation are amended by striking
Article III of such Articles of Incorporation and by inserting and substituting
the following Article III:

                                  ARTICLE III

         This corporation shall be authorized to issue forty million
(40,000,000) shares of common stock with no par value. No shareholder of the
corporation shall have any preemptive right to subscribe to or purchase any new
or additional shares of any class of stock of this corporation. Each
shareholder shall be entitled to one vote per share and there shall be no
accumulative voting rights.

         RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation are amended to provide
for a reverse split of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of the
corporation. The manner for effecting the division of the outstanding shares
will be as follows

         Every five (5) shares of common stock which are issued and outstanding
are automatically converted into one (1) share of common stock; provided
however that the corporation shall issue one (1) full share of common stock to
its shareholders for any fractional interest remaining after conversion of all
outstanding shares pursuant hereto.

         This amendment has been adopted in accordance with the Minnesota 
Business Corporation Act.

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

         The undersigned, being the secretary of Scientific NRG, Incorporated,
hereby certifies that the foregoing resolutions are valid resolutions duly
adopted by the Board of Directors and by the affirmative vote of the holders of
a majority of the voting power of the shares present and entitled to vote at
the special meeting of shareholders held October 24, 1996. This certification
is made this 12th day of November 1996.

                                               /s/ Tami Miller                  
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Tami Miller, Secretary
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3095

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the 

rules of etiquette for flying the flag of the United States 

do not preclude the flying of flags at half mast when 

ordered by city and local officials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3095 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Recogni3 tion Act of 2004’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FLAG CODE AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amend6 ed by inserting after the sentence beginning ‘‘In the event 

7 of the death of a present or former official of the govern8 ment of any State’’ the following: ‘‘In the event of the 

9 death of a present or former official of any city or other 

10 locality, the chief elected official of that locality may pro11 claim that the National flag shall be flown at half staff.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795662
<NAME> STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,147)
<INVENTORY>                                     79,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,376
<PP&E>                                         753,137
<DEPRECIATION>                               (310,425)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,365
<BONDS>                                        876,814
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,894
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                   (361,965)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,793
<SALES>                                        171,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,929
<CGS>                                          155,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,592)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Crowell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Elcom International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

Date: April 11, 2005

/s/ Robert J. Crowell

Robert J. Crowell
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2021048EN.01001101.xml

| 11.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/11

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 48/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6 November 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85756 |
| Decision No | 128/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 Closure grants |
| Legal basis | Act No 38/2020 on closure grants |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | The objective of the measure is to maintain the level of employment and economic activity in Iceland by supporting undertakings that have incurred a temporary loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus. |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | An estimated budget ISK 1 billion and a maximum budget ISK 2 billion |
| Duration | Until 30 June 2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Iceland Revenue and Customs |
| Tryggvagata 19 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

6 November 2020

Case No

85756

Decision No

128/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 Closure grants

Legal basis

Act No 38/2020 on closure grants

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

The objective of the measure is to maintain the level of employment and economic activity in Iceland by supporting undertakings that have incurred a temporary loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus.

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

An estimated budget ISK 1 billion and a maximum budget ISK 2 billion

Duration

Until 30 June 2021

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Iceland Revenue and Customs

Tryggvagata 19

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2021103EN.01000901.xml

| 25.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/9

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 103/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14 December 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85894 |
| Decision No | 160/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 Resilience grants |
| Legal basis | The Act on Resilience Grants (ice. lög um viðspyrnustyrki) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To contribute to the continued economic activity of undertakings that have suffered loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | ISK 19,8 billion (approx. EUR 122 million) |
| Duration | 31 May 2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Iceland Revenue and Customs |
| Tryggvagata 19 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

14 December 2020

Case No

85894

Decision No

160/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 Resilience grants

Legal basis

The Act on Resilience Grants (ice. lög um viðspyrnustyrki)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To contribute to the continued economic activity of undertakings that have suffered loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

ISK 19,8 billion (approx. EUR 122 million)

Duration

31 May 2021

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Iceland Revenue and Customs

Tryggvagata 19

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
Exhibit 10.13

                          ELEPHANT & CASTLE GROUP, INC.
                             Revised Lease Abstract


1.       PROJECT:         White Avenue, Edmonton, Canada

2.       TENANT:          Elephant & Castle Group, Inc.

3.       STORE AREA:      6133 s.f.

4.       TRADE NAME:      Rainforest Cafe

5.       USE:             For the operation of a traditional Elephant &
                          Castle pub restaurant.

6.       TERM:            15 years

7.       TERM START
         DATE:            October 1, 1997

8.       TERM EXPIRY
         DATE:            September 30, 2012

9.       EXTENSION        First Extension Term:  5 years
         PERIODS:         Second Extension Term:  5 years

10.      GROSS RENT:      Can $71,508 increased to Can $112,676

11.      PERCENTAGE       6.85% of Gross Revenue, less Annual Minimum Rent   
         RENT:
         

12.      PREPAID RENT:    Can. $20,000

13.      SECURITY
         DEPOSIT:         Nil

14.      ADDITIONAL       Occupancy costs plus various other taxes  
         COSTS:           defined in the Lease.

15.      INDUCEMENTS:     Can. $86.660 paid to Lessee.
<PAGE>

16.      LANDLORD         366575 Alberta Ltd. 
         ADDRESS:         10835-107 Avenue    
                          Edmonton, Alberta   
                          Canada              
                          
17.      GUARANTOR:       None

18.      PROPERTY         366575 Ltd. 
         MANAGER:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00430- CV

HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant

V.
SAUL RODRIGUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-40476

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 7, 2018 . The clerk’s record
was filed July 10, 2018

. The reporter’s record was filed July 2, 2018. No brief was

filed.

On November 6, 2018 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant
filed a brief on or before November 21, 2018 , the court would dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered
dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell.
Exhibit 10.5

                             AGREEMENT OF AMENDMENT

         This  Agreement  is made and entered into this 20th day of October 1997
by and  between  the  Trustees  of Oceana  Way  Associates  (hereinafter  called
"Landlord") and Catalink Direct, Inc. (hereinafter called "Tenant").

                                   WITNESSETH

         WHEREAS, by lease dated July 15, 1993 (hereinafter called the "Lease"),
Tenant leases a premises located at 10 Oceana Way, Norwood, Massachusetts; and

         WHEREAS,  Landlord and Tenant desire to extend the original term of the
Lease and modify certain provisions thereof;

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  for  valuable  consideration,  the  Lease  is  hereby
modified and amended as follows:

          1.  In Section 1.1, the  definition of Term is deleted and "the period
              ending July 31, 2001" is inserted in its place.

          2.  In Section 1.1 in the  definition of Annual Fixed Rent Rate,  "and
              $115,000.00  thereafter" is deleted and the following  inserted in
              its place:

              "$115,000.00 during the fourth and fifth years, $259,586.25 during
              the  sixth  year,   $295,391.25   during  the  seventh  year,  and
              $331,196.25 thereafter."

          3. Section 2.4 is deleted in its entirety.

         Except as expressly amended hereinabove,  all of the terms,  conditions
and  provisions of the Lease are ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full
force and effect.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Landlord  and  Tenant  have duly  executed  this
Agreement of Amendment.

Tenant:                                        Landlord:

Catalink Direct, Inc.                          Oceana Way Associates



By:      /s/ Michael J. McEachern              By: /s/ Roger P. Nordblom
                                               As Trustee but not individually
§ 308.121 Notification to primary regulator. ( a ) *Service of notification.* ( 1 ) Upon a determination by the Board of Directors or its designee pursuant to § 308.120 of an unsafe or unsound practice or condition or of a violation, a notification shall be served upon the appropriate Federal banking agency of the insured depository institution, or the State banking supervisor if the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency. The notification shall be served not less than 30 days before the Notice of Intent to Terminate Insured Status required by section 8(a)(2)(B) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(2)(B)), and § 308.122, except that this period for notification may be reduced or eliminated with the agreement of the appropriate Federal banking agency.
( 2 ) *Appropriate Federal banking agency* shall have the meaning given that term in section 3(q) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1813(q)), and shall be the OCC in the case of a national bank, a District bank or an insured Federal branch of a foreign bank; the FDIC in the case of an insured nonmember bank, including an insured State branch of a foreign bank; the Board of Governors in the case of a state member bank; or the OTS in the case of an insured Federal or state savings association.
( 3 ) In the case of a state nonmember bank, insured Federal branch of a foreign bank, or state member bank, in addition to service of the notification upon the appropriate Federal banking agency, a copy of the notification shall be sent to the appropriate State banking supervisor.
( 4 ) In instances in which a Temporary Order Suspending Insurance is issued pursuant to section 8(a)(8) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(8)), the notification may be served concurrently with such order.
( b ) *Contents of notification.* The notification shall contain the FDIC's determination, and the facts and circumstances upon which such determination is based, for the purpose of securing correction of such practice, condition, or violation.
#### William J. Tierney, Respondent, *v.*The Peerless Shoe Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court.

Thompson & Maloney (J. Campbell Thompson, of counsel), for appellant.

John T. Fenlon,. for respondent.

*804
      *Per Curiam.*

The complaint alleges a cause of action on a promissory note of the tenor following:

*"376.*New York, *October*26, 1898.

"Seven months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Sheridan S. Norton, as Assignee, Three hundred and seventy-five 00/100 Dollars, at our office, 430 West 14th Street, New York City, with interest.

"Value received with current rate of exchange.

“ Due May 26, 1899. "Peerless Shoe Company,

S. A. Byers, *Treas.”*

The answer sets up a counterclaim of $947.87 for rent, owing by Sheridan S. Norton, as assignee, of premises No. 430 West Fourteenth street, New York city, owned by Henry Mienken, and an assignment of said claim to the defendant. The assignee was clearly liable, for the rent during the time the assigned business was carried on at No. 430 West Fourteenth street, to the owner, Mienken, and the defense, having an assignment of that claim, could have it set off against the note. Even if the counterclaim, instead of being for rent, had been for use and occupation, it would have been a good counterclaim, and we think that the trial judge should have allowed the amendment of the answer according to the proofs.

But it was error for the trial judge to take the case from the jury, as the testimony of the assignee Norton, he being the real party in interest as payee and indorsee of the note, must be passed upon by the jury. Dean v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 119 N. Y. 540; Goldsmith v. Coverly, 75 Hun, 48.

Judgment appealed from reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Conlan, McCarthy and Scotchman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
§ 304.24 Bank service provider notification. ( a ) A bank service provider is required to notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible when the bank service provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to such banking organization for four or more hours. ( 1 ) A bank-designated point of contact is an email address, phone number, or any other contact(s), previously provided to the bank service provider by the banking organization customer.
( 2 ) If the banking organization customer has not previously provided a bank-designated point of contact, such notification shall be made to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer of the banking organization customer, or two individuals of comparable responsibilities, through any reasonable means.
( b ) The notification requirement in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any scheduled maintenance, testing, or software update previously communicated to a banking organization customer.
#### § 34.20 Definitions.

*Adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loan* means an extension of credit made to finance or refinance the purchase of, and secured by a lien on, a one-to-four family dwelling, including a condominium unit, cooperative housing unit, or residential manufactured home, where the lender, pursuant to an agreement with the borrower, may adjust the rate of interest from time to time. An ARM loan does not include fixed-rate extensions of credit that are payable at the end of a term that, when added to any terms for which the bank has promised to renew the loan, is shorter than the term of the amortization schedule.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3147

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 324

‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.Twenty-Fifth Street in Ogden, Utah, as the

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3147

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 324 TwentyFifth Street in Ogden, Utah, as the ‘‘James V. Hansen

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3147 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth

3 Street in Ogden, Utah, shall be known and designated as

4 the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.