alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         548,109
<SECURITIES>                                   1,230,213
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,587,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   329,691
<INVENTORY>                                    6,661,584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,014,171
<PP&E>                                         9,961,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,051,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,375,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,066,755
<BONDS>                                        10,333,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,469
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,951,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,375,246
<SALES>                                        13,050,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,050,099
<CGS>                                          8,381,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,464,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               837,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               61,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             458,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,366,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                   556,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            810,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   810,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .35


</TABLE>
§ 8.15 Provision for paid-up insurance; other than 5-year level premium term or limited convertible 5-year level premium term policies. ( a ) If a National Service Life Insurance policy on any plan other than 5-year level premium term or limited convertible 5-year level premium term plan has not been surrendered for cash, upon written request of the insured and complete surrender of the insurance with all claims thereunder, after the expiration of the first policy year and while the policy is in force under premium-paying conditions, the United States will issue paid-up insurance for such amount as the cash value less any indebtedness, and a charge for administrative cost for insurance issued under 38 U.S.C. 1925, will purchase when applied as a net single premium at the attained age of the insured. For this purpose the attained age is the age on the birthday anniversary nearest to the effective date of the policy plus the number of years and months from that date to the date the paid-up insurance becomes effective. Such paid-up insurance will be effective as of the expiration of the period for which premiums have been paid and earned; and, any premiums paid in advance for months subsequent to that in which the application for paid-up insurance is made shall be refunded to the insured. The paid-up insurance, if eligible to participate in and to receive dividends, shall be with the right to dividends. The insured may at any time surrender the paid-up policy for its cash value or obtain a loan on such paid-up insurance.
( b ) The United States shall not issue paid-up insurance under VALife until the insured has paid premiums during the two-year waiting period imposed by 38 U.S.C. 1922B(c)(2) before VALife coverage is in force.
[30 FR 3648, Mar. 19, 1965. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29290, 29293, June 10, 1996. Redesignated at 65 FR 7437, Feb. 15, 2000; 87 FR 73654, Dec. 1, 2022]
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3104 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

AN ACT 

To provide for the establishment of separate campaign medals to be awarded to members of the uniformed services 

who participate in Operation Enduring Freedom and to 

members of the uniformed services who participate in 

Operation Iraqi Freedom. 
2 

HR 3104 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT. 

4 The President shall establish a campaign medal spe5 cifically to recognize service by members of the uniformed 

6 services in Operation Enduring Freedom and a separate 

7 campaign medal specifically to recognize service by mem8 bers of the uniformed services in Operation Iraqi Free9 dom. 

10 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY. 

11 Subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by 

12 the President, eligibility for a campaign medal established 

13 pursuant to section 1 shall be set forth in regulations to 

14 be prescribed by the Secretary concerned (as defined in 

15 section 101 of title 10, United States Code). In the case 

16 of regulations prescribed by the Secretaries of the military 

17 departments, the regulations shall be subject to approval 

18 by the Secretary of Defense and shall be uniform through19 out the Department of Defense. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 30, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
§ 239.31 Indemnification; employment contracts. ( a ) *Restrictions on indemnification.* The provisions of § 239.40 shall apply to subsidiary holding companies.
( b ) *Restrictions on employment contracts.* The provisions of § 239.41 and any policies of the Board thereunder shall apply to subsidiary holding companies.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

               FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE & LOAN AGREEMENT

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE & LOAN AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is
dated May 10, 2001, by Saf-T-Hammer Corporation, a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Nevada ("STH") and Colton Melby ("CM").

      WHEREAS, STH and CM have entered into that certain Promissory Note & Loan
Agreement dated as of May 6, 2001 (the "Original Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Original
Agreement as set forth herein; and

      NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:

      A.    The Original Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new
Section 25:

25. Upon the closing of the SW Transaction, the Company shall issue Common Stock
Purchase Warrants to the individuals and in the amounts set forth below, which
shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A:

      Clifford L. Melby -- 300,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company
      Christopher A. Melby -- 300,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company
      Jack Saxwold -- 300,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company

      B. Paragraph 8 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to provide
that Colton Melby hereby waives any and all preemptive rights granted pursuant
to Paragraph 8 with respect to those certain Common Stock Purchase Warrants
issued to Clifford Melby, Christopher Melby and Jack Saxwold to purchase
300,000, 300,000 and 300,000 shares, respectively, of the common stock of
Saf-T-Hammer Corporation in connection with the SW Transaction.

      C. All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has cause this Amendment
to be duly signed as of the date first above written.

<PAGE>   2

Saf-T-Hammer Corporation

By:____________________________           ___________________________
Name:                                     Colton Melby
Title:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2984

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that 

processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order 

applicable to pears. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. WALDEN of Oregon (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. 

NETHERCUTT, and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the 

requirement that processors be members of an agency 

administering a marketing order applicable to pears.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PEAR MARKETING ORDERS. 

4 Section 8c(7)(C) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act 

5 (7 U.S.C. 608c(7)(C)), reenacted with amendments by the 

6 Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amend7 ed in the last sentence—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘or pears’’; and 
2

•HR 2984 IH 

1 (2) by striking ‘‘: Provided,’’ and all that fol2 lows through ‘‘be equal’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30 , 2005  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Chief   Executive  Officer of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer , Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 12, 2005
§ 3.601 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart is applicable to proceedings by the OCC to issue a directive under 12 U.S.C. 3907(b)(2) or 12 U.S.C. 1464(s), as appropriate. A directive is an order issued to a national bank or Federal savings association that does not have or maintain capital at or above the minimum ratios set forth in subpart B of this part, or established for the national bank or Federal savings association under subpart H of this part, by a written agreement under 12 U.S.C. 1818(b), or as a condition for approval of an application. A directive may order the national bank or Federal savings association to: ( 1 ) Achieve the minimum capital ratios applicable to it by a specified date;
( 2 ) Adhere to a previously submitted plan to achieve the applicable capital ratios;
( 3 ) Submit and adhere to a plan acceptable to the OCC describing the means and time schedule by which the national bank or Federal savings association shall achieve the applicable capital ratios;
( 4 ) Take other action, such as reduction of assets or the rate of growth of assets, or restrictions on the payment of dividends, to achieve the applicable capital ratios; or
( 5 ) A combination of any of these or similar actions.
( b ) A directive issued under this rule, including a plan submitted under a directive, is enforceable under the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 1818(i) in the same manner and to the same extent as an effective and outstanding cease and desist order issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818(b) that has become final. Violation of a directive may result in assessment of civil money penalties in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 3909(d).
[78 FR 62269, Oct. 11, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 42640, July 14, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                 NEWPORT CORPORATION 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


     The undersigned, Robert C. Hewitt, Secretary of Newport Corporation, hereby
certifies as follows:

     1.  Initially, 300,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
under the Newport Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan").

     2.  Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on
May 17, 2000, the amount of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan was
increased by 300,000 shares, to 600,000.

     3.  Effective May 30, 2000, the Company effected a three-for-one split of
its common stock, which, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, increased the number
of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to 1,800,000
shares (as constituted following the three-for-one stock split).


Dated: June 1, 2000                    /s/ Robert C. Hewitt
                                        _________________________________
                                        Robert C. Hewitt, Secretary
                                        Newport Corporation
§ 25.15 Impact and responsiveness review of community development loans, community development investments, and community development services. ( a ) *Impact and responsiveness review, in general.* Under the Community Development Financing Test in § 25.24, the Community Development Services Test in § 25.25, and the Community Development Financing Test for Limited Purpose Banks and Savings Associations in § 25.26, the appropriate Federal banking agency evaluates the extent to which a bank's or savings association's community development loans, community development investments, and community development services are impactful and responsive in meeting community development needs in each facility-based assessment area and, as applicable, each State, multistate MSA, and the nationwide area. The appropriate Federal banking agency evaluates the impact and responsiveness of a bank's or savings association's community development loans, community development investments, or community development services based on paragraph (b) of this section, and may take into account performance context information pursuant to § 25.21(d).
( b ) *Impact and responsiveness review factors.* Factors considered in evaluating the impact and responsiveness of a bank's or savings association's community development loans, community development investments, and community development services include, but are not limited to, whether the community development loan, community development investment, or community development service: ( 1 ) Benefits or serves one or more persistent poverty counties;
( 2 ) Benefits or serves one or more census tracts with a poverty rate of 40 percent or higher;
( 3 ) Benefits or serves one or more geographic areas with low levels of community development financing;
( 4 ) Supports an MDI, WDI, LICU, or CDFI, excluding certificates of deposit with a term of less than one year;
( 5 ) Benefits or serves low-income individuals, families, or households;
( 6 ) Supports small businesses or small farms with gross annual revenues of $250,000 or less;
( 7 ) Directly facilitates the acquisition, construction, development, preservation, or improvement of affordable housing in High Opportunity Areas;
( 8 ) Benefits or serves residents of Native Land Areas;
( 9 ) Is a grant or donation;
( 10 ) Is an investment in projects financed with LIHTCs or NMTCs;
( 11 ) Reflects bank or savings association leadership through multi-faceted or instrumental support; or
( 12 ) Is a new community development financing product or service that addresses community development needs for low- or moderate-income individuals, families, or households.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q 
FOR PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 27, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-27-1996
<CASH>                                         9,351
<SECURITIES>                                   23,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                  46,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,873
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,033
<PP&E>                                         8,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,902
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       81
<OTHER-SE>                                     99,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,634
<SALES>                                        79,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               79,604
<CGS>                                          48,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,334)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 

Project No.: 0172.07.005.504 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call 

Date: 2/22/2010 Time: 2:45 pm EST 

Company Name: KY Surface Water Permits Division 

 

Contact Name: Jory Becker 

Phone No.: 502-564-3410 ext. 4850

Name: Jessica Wolford Eastern Research Group 

GENERAL SUBJECT : Review of DMR data and Permits for Bullitt County Landfill (KY0091651) and Reed Duplex Apt. Bldg. (KY0095036) 

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

I called Jory Becker on Monday, February 22, 2010 at 2:45 pm to discuss DMR data submitted by Bullitt 

County Landfill (KY0091651) and Reed Duplex Apt. Bldg. (KY0095036). I provided Mr. Becker a brief 

review of the 304(m) project and how we obtain the DMR data. I asked him if he could provide information on 

the flows. Mr. Becker said that KY sends print outs of the previous DMR data from PCS to the facilities to 

mark-up hard copy. Then the data is entered exactly as written using double-key entry. He explained that errors 

in the data were likely not data entry errors, but errors on the facility’s side. 

Bullet County Landfill

Mr. Becker said the landfill is a residential landfill. The 2008 permit renewal indicates the flow for the previous 

5-year permit period was 0.003 MGD monthly average and 0.092 MGD daily maximum. He said the DMR data 

for July 2008 indicate the flow was 38 GPD while October 2008 was 2,285 MGD. He suspected the October 

2008 flow should be in GPD also because of the size of the landfill and previous monitoring data. From the 

2008 permit renewal, Mr. Becker said the total recoverable iron concentrations were 55.85 mg/L monthly 

average and 735 mg/L daily maximum. 

Reed Duplex Apt. Bldg.

Mr. Becker said the 2007 permit indicates the outfall has a design flow of 0.001 MGD. The flow for the 3rd

quarter 2008 was 312 MGD, but he suspected the units should be GPD instead. The 3rd quarter 2008 total 

residual chlorine concentration was also 6.42 mg/L (matches the DMR database). Mr. Becker indicated that the 

chlorine limit is 0.019 mg/L because of surface water quality. He reviewed the other DMR data and previous 

permit to see if the facility reported numbers that met the limit during other periods. The previous permit did not 

include total residual chlorine, so he only had data for 2007 through 2009. The concentrations were 0.02 mg/L, 

6.42 mg/L, and 10.16 mg/L, respectively. He also reviewed the lab certificate for 3Q 2009 to verify the 10.16 

mg/L concentration. The lab certificate indicated the 10.16 mg/L was valid.
§ 269b.220 Priority; acceleration of proceedings. ( a ) A charge of “refusal to bargain” or a charge that, if sustained, would require the setting aside of an election or the conduct of a new election shall be given priority.
( b ) The parties, individually or jointly, may petition the panel at any time to invoke immediately the formal hearing procedures set forth in § 269b.410. They may also petition the panel to entertain the matter itself without prior investigation and/or without the formal hearing procedure set forth in § 269b.410. The panel is empowered also on its own motion to so accelerate disposition of the case.
( c ) Before accelerating a case the panel may utilize whatever proceedings it may deem appropriate and timely to allow parties in interest to comment on the proposed course of action.