alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1****I, Ernesto Greco*****,*****certify that:**1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Ernesto Greco Ernesto Greco  Chief Executive Officer  July 2, 2007
#### § 268.407 Civil action: Equal Pay Act.

A complainant is authorized under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 216(b)) to file a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction within two years or, if the violation is willful, three years of the date of the alleged violation of the Equal Pay Act regardless of whether he or she pursued any administrative complaint processing. Recovery of back wages is limited to two years prior to the date of filing suit, or to three years if the violation is deemed willful; liquidated damages in an equal amount may also be awarded. The filing of a complaint or appeal under this part shall not toll the time for filing a civil action.
VOC Emission Rate lb/hr tpy EPFUG EPR Unit Fugitives 17.61 77.12 FLARE1 Waste Gas Flare 9.66 13.68 27NV M-Line Dryer Vent 1T23M M-Line Shaker Screen Vent 41C11M South Slurry Tank Vent 115N N-Line Dryer Vent 101N N-Line Rotary Screen Vent 104N N-Line Cyclone Vent 51C19N N-Line Slurry Surge Tank

Vent TK-2D-3CCatalyst Tank Vent 0.15 0.01 TK-2D-15DCatalyst Tank Vent 26.09 2.53 TK-2D-6ECatalyst Tank Vent 3.42 0.12 WCT-32 Cooling Tower 0.5 1.66 WWFUG Wastewater Fugitives 0.03 0.03



### EPR UNIT: Permitted Emission Summary, Permit #19663

N Finishing Line N Line Vent Indvidual Stack Number

18 Name EPN Individual Point Name

M Finishing Line M Line Vent

34.13 14.8 36.44
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**KENNETH LEE,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA**

**BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE AND MICHAEL POTTEIGER,**  **CHAIRMAN, COMMONWEALTH OF**

**PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,** 

**Appellees :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 6 WAP 2014** 

**Appeal from the Order of Commonwealth Court dated February 20, 2014, at No. 629** 

**MD 2013.**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, **this 30th day of October, 2014, the order of the Com monwealth Court** 

**is hereby** AFFIRMED

**.**
#### § 1249.17 Waiver of regulations.

The Director reserves the right, in the Director's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of this part in any case or class of cases for the convenience of an Enterprise, the United States, or in order to relieve any person(s) of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect any substantial existing rights, and the Director is satisfied that such action will not subject an Enterprise or the United States to any substantial expense or liability.
§ 303.162 Waiver from compliance. ( a ) *General.* An institution proposing to convert from mutual to stock form may file with the appropriate FDIC office a letter requesting waiver of compliance with this subpart or § 333.4 of this chapter: ( 1 ) When compliance with any provision of this section or § 333.4 of this chapter would be inconsistent or in conflict with applicable state law, or
( 2 ) For any other good cause shown.
( b ) *Content of filing.* In making a request for waiver under paragraph (a) of this section, the institution shall demonstrate that the requested waiver, if granted, would not result in any effects that would be detrimental to the safety and soundness of the institution, entail a breach of fiduciary duty on part of the institution's management or otherwise be detrimental or inequitable to the institution, its depositors, any other insured depository institution(s), the Deposit Insurance Fund, or to the public interest.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 20526, Apr. 21, 2006]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                             162                     162
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,591                  48,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,619                  11,619
<INVENTORY>                                     16,757                  16,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,374                  54,374
<PP&E>                                           4,621                   4,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,721                   3,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,068                  56,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,849                  35,849
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           272                     272
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,197                   6,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,068                  56,068
<SALES>                                         49,827                 155,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,827                 155,778
<CGS>                                           36,105                 116,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,585                 146,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (4)                    (49)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,096                   5,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,150                   3,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75                     170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,075                   3,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,075                   3,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15                     .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14                     .33
        



</TABLE>
§ 244.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority* — ( 1 ) *In general.* This part (Regulation RR) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) (15 U.S.C. 78o-11), as well as under the Federal Reserve Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 221 *et seq.*); section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act), as amended (12 U.S.C. 1818); the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHC Act) (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*); the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (HOLA) (12 U.S.C. 1461 *et seq.*); section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) (12 U.S.C. 5365); and the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended (12 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*).
( 2 ) Nothing in this part shall be read to limit the authority of the Board to take action under provisions of law other than 15 U.S.C. 78o-11, including action to address unsafe or unsound practices or conditions, or violations of law or regulation, under section 8 of the FDI Act.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part requires any securitizer to retain an economic interest in a portion of the credit risk for any asset that the securitizer, through the issuance of an asset-backed security, transfers, sells, or conveys to a third party in a transaction within the scope of section 15G of the Exchange Act. This part specifies the permissible types, forms, and amounts of credit risk retention, and establishes certain exemptions for securitizations collateralized by assets that meet specified underwriting standards or that otherwise qualify for an exemption.
( c ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This part applies to any securitizer that is: ( i ) A state member bank (as defined in 12 CFR 208.2(g)); or
( ii ) Any subsidiary of a state member bank.
( 2 ) Section 15G of the Exchange Act and the rules issued thereunder apply to any securitizer that is: ( i ) A bank holding company (as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1842);
( ii ) A foreign banking organization (as defined in 12 CFR 211.21(o));
( iii ) An Edge or agreement corporation (as defined in 12 CFR 211.1(c)(2) and (3));
( iv ) A nonbank financial company that the Financial Stability Oversight Council has determined under section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) (12 U.S.C. 5323) shall be supervised by the Board and for which such determination is still in effect; or
( v ) A savings and loan holding company (as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1467a); and
( vi ) Any subsidiary of the foregoing.
( 3 ) Compliance with this part is required: ( i ) With respect to any securitization transaction collateralized by residential mortgages on December 24, 2015; and
( ii ) With respect to any other securitization transaction on December 24, 2016.
[79 FR 77764, Dec. 24, 2014]
# C_2007038EN.01001301.xml

| 22.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/13

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 d of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid)

(2007/C 38/10)

| Aid No | Training aid 1/06 |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Sunnhordland
  Hordaland |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Plan for bruk av kompensasjonsmidlar i Sunnhordland
  Plan for the use of compensation funds in Sunnhordland |
| Legal basis | Statsbudsjettet (St. prp No 1 2005-2006) Kap.551 Post 61: Næringsretta utviklingstiltak/kompensasjon for auka arbeidsgjevaravgift.
  Referanse nr.: KRD 05401008
  Referanse nr.: HFK KA 08-05 og 104-04 |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme | Annual overall amount: EUR 1,25 million (NOK 10 million) |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 15.1.2006 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 30.12.2009 |
| Objective of the aid | Specific training |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for training aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Samarbeidsrådet for Sunnhordland |
| Boks 444 |
| 5402 Stord |
| Telephone: (47) 53 45 57 90 |
| firmapost@samarbeidsraadet-sunnhordland.no |

Aid No

Training aid 1/06

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Sunnhordland

Hordaland

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Plan for bruk av kompensasjonsmidlar i Sunnhordland

Plan for the use of compensation funds in Sunnhordland

Legal basis

Statsbudsjettet (St. prp No 1 2005-2006) Kap.551 Post 61: Næringsretta utviklingstiltak/kompensasjon for auka arbeidsgjevaravgift.

Referanse nr.: KRD 05401008

Referanse nr.: HFK KA 08-05 og 104-04

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme

Annual overall amount: EUR 1,25 million (NOK 10 million)

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

15.1.2006

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 30.12.2009

Objective of the aid

Specific training

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for training aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Samarbeidsrådet for Sunnhordland

Boks 444

5402 Stord

Telephone: (47) 53 45 57 90

firmapost@samarbeidsraadet-sunnhordland.no

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 5 of the Regulation

---
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. FRANCIS CORDIA, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

November 12, 1912.

INTOXICATING LIQUOR: Illegal Sales: Sufficiency of Record. In a prosecution for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor by a merchant, in violation of Sec. 11640,. R. S. 1909, *held*that the record does not disclose any error of irregularity justifying a reversal of the judgment of conviction. “

Appeal from Washington Circuit *Court.*— Eon. *Joseph J. Williams,*Judge.

Affirmed.

iM. *E. Rhoades*and *Byrns & Bean*for appellant.

*W. A. Cooper*and *S. G. Nipper*for respondent.

CAULFIELD, J.

Defendant was indicted, tried and, on September 3,1910, convicted for selling intoxicating liquor in less quantity than five gallons, he being á merchant, having a merchant’s license authorizing him to deal in goods, wares and merchandise, but no dramshop license, and the prosecution being under section 11640 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1909. He appeals to this court but assigns no error and does not file a brief in the cause.

An examination of the record fails to disclose any error or insufficiency in the indictment or other proceedings, or any error or irregularity in the trial justifying a reversal of the judgment. The evidence warrants the conviction and the instructions fairly present the case to the jury.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

*Reynolds, P. J.,*and *Nortoni, J.,*concur.
#### §§ 3.125-3.130 [Reserved]
I n c o r p o r a t i o n b y R e f e r e n c e D o c k e t I D N o
. E P A

- HQ

- O AR

- 2010

- 092 9

D ece m b e r 10 , 2010

T h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e f

o l l o w i n g d o c k e t s a r e h e r e b y i n c o r po r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e i n t o a n d a r e

c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n c l ud e d i n , c o n t a i n e d i n a n d t o h a v e b e e n p l ace d i n D o c k e t E P A

- HQ

- O A R2010

- 0929 ( C h a n g e t o t h e R e p o r t i n g D a t e f

o r I npu t s t o E qu a

t i o n s ) :

1) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0924 ( C o n f i d e n t i a l B u s i n e ss I n f

o r m a t i o n ) 2) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2010

- 0964 ( C a ll f o r I n f o r m a t i o n )

A c c e ss i n g d o c k e t s :

P ub l i c l y a v a il a b l e d o c k e t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e e i t h e r e l e c t r o n i c a ll y t h r o ug h

www

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g ov o r i n h a r d c o p y a t E P A ’ s D o c k e t C e n t e r , P ub li c R ea d i ng R oo m , E P A W e s t B u il d i ng , R o o m 3334

, 1301 C o n s t i t u t i o n A v e n u e , N W

, Wa s h i ng t o n , D C 2000 4

. T h i s D o c k e t F a c il i t y i s o p e n f

r o m 8 : 30 a

. m

. t o 4 : 3 0 p

. m ., M o n d a y t h r o ug h F r i d a y , e x c l

u d i ng l e g a l h o li d a y s

. T h e t e l e p h o n e n u m

b e r f o r t h e P ub li c R e a d i n g R o o m i s ( 202 ) 566

- 1744

, a n d t h e t e l e p h o n e

n u m b e r f o r t h e A i r D o c k e t i s ( 202 ) 566

- 174 2

.
§ 217.44 Securitization exposures to which the SSFA and gross-up approach do not apply. ( a ) *General requirement.* A Board-regulated institution must assign a 1,250 percent risk weight to all securitization exposures to which the Board-regulated institution does not apply the SSFA or the gross-up approach under § 217.43, except as set forth in this section.
( b ) *Eligible ABCP liquidity facilities.* A Board-regulated institution may determine the risk-weighted asset amount of an eligible ABCP liquidity facility by multiplying the exposure amount by the highest risk weight applicable to any of the individual underlying exposures covered by the facility.
( c ) *A securitization exposure in a second loss position or better to an ABCP program* — ( 1 ) *Risk weighting.* A Board-regulated institution may determine the risk-weighted asset amount of a securitization exposure that is in a second loss position or better to an ABCP program that meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(2) of this section by multiplying the exposure amount by the higher of the following risk weights: ( i ) 100 percent; and
( ii ) The highest risk weight applicable to any of the individual underlying exposures of the ABCP program.
( 2 ) *Requirements.* ( i ) The exposure is not an eligible ABCP liquidity facility;
( ii ) The exposure must be economically in a second loss position or better, and the first loss position must provide significant credit protection to the second loss position;
( iii ) The exposure qualifies as investment grade; and
( iv ) The Board-regulated institution holding the exposure must not retain or provide protection to the first loss position.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of SETO Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Eugene J. Pian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated:   September 13, 2004
    /s/ Eugene J. PianEugene J. PianPresident and Chief Executive Officer This certification accompanies this quarterly report on form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52451-52452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-898]


Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Semi-Annual New 
Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6412.

Background

    On July 27, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published the preliminary results of a

[[Page 52452]]

semi-annual new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on 
chlorinated isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China, covering 
the period June 1, 2008, through November 30, 2008, and the exporter, 
Juancheng Kangtai Chemical co., Ltd. (``Kangtai''). See Chlorinated 
Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results 
of June 2008 through November 2008 Semi-Annual New Shipper Review, 74 
FR 37007 (July 27, 2009). The final results are currently due on 
October 18, 2009.

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``the Act''), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the Department to issue 
the final results of a new shipper review within 90 days after the date 
on which the preliminary results were issued. The Department may, 
however, extend the 90-day period for completion of the final results 
of a new shipper review to 150 days if it determines that the case is 
extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    As a result of issues raised in this new shipper review, 
specifically the issue of collapsing Kangtai into a single entity with 
its affiliated supplier, certain surrogate values, and surrogate 
financial ratios, the Department determines that this new shipper 
review is extraordinarily complicated and it cannot complete this new 
shipper review within the current time limit. Accordingly, the 
Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the final 
results by 60 days until December 17, 2009, in accordance with sections 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: October 6, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-24600 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P