alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06739

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06739\06739_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06739\06739_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 06739\06739_Followup Questions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

06739\06739_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06739\06739_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06739\06739_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06739\06739_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06739\06739_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06739\06739_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_D3-1 POND-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_D3-1 POND-2 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_D3-1 POND-3 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06739\Supplemental Documents\06739_Table A-2 Air Pollution Permits.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06739\Supplemental Documents\AEP WSH 06739 A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06739\Supplemental Documents\Certification Statement Plant ID 06739.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\Follow Up\06739_telecon1.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

x 06739\Supplemental Documents\Follow Up\Follow Up Responses 2.28.2011.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ John E. Halnen
 John
E. HalnenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 25.16 Facility-based assessment areas. ( a ) *In general.* A bank or savings association must delineate one or more facility-based assessment areas within which the appropriate Federal banking agency evaluates the bank's or savings association's record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community pursuant to the performance tests and strategic plan described in § 25.21.
( b ) *Geographic requirements for facility-based assessment areas.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, a bank's or savings association's facility-based assessment areas must include each county in which a bank or savings association has a main office, a branch, or a deposit-taking remote service facility, as well as the surrounding counties in which the bank or savings association has originated or purchased a substantial portion of its loans (including home mortgage loans, multifamily loans, small business loans, small farm loans, and automobile loans).
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, each of a bank's or savings association's facility-based assessment areas must consist of a single MSA, one or more contiguous counties within an MSA, or one or more contiguous counties within the nonmetropolitan area of a State.
( 3 ) An intermediate bank or savings association or a small bank or savings association may adjust the boundaries of its facility-based assessment areas to include only the portion of a county that it reasonably can be expected to serve, subject to paragraph (c) of this section. A facility-based assessment area that includes a partial county must consist of contiguous whole census tracts.
( c ) *Other limitations on the delineation of a facility-based assessment area.* Each of a bank's or savings association's facility-based assessment areas: ( 1 ) May not reflect illegal discrimination; and
( 2 ) May not arbitrarily exclude low- or moderate-income census tracts. In determining whether a bank or savings association has arbitrarily excluded low- or moderate-income census tracts from a facility-based assessment area, the appropriate Federal banking agency takes into account the bank's or savings association's capacity and constraints, including its size and financial condition.
( d ) *Military banks or savings associations.* Notwithstanding the requirements of this section, a military bank or savings association whose customers are not located within a defined geographic area may delineate the entire United States and its territories as its sole facility-based assessment area.
( e ) *Use of facility-based assessment areas.* The appropriate Federal banking agency uses the facility-based assessment areas delineated by a bank or savings association in its evaluation of the bank's or savings association's CRA performance unless the appropriate Federal banking agency determines that the facility-based assessment areas do not comply with the requirements of this section.
# C_2016338EN.01001101.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/11

---

Dangerous substances — List of authorisation decisions taken by the EEA EFTA States in accordance with Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) in the second half of 2015

(2016/C 338/13)

Subcommittee I on the free movement of goods

Subcommittee I on the free movement of goods

To be noted by the EEA Joint Committee

To be noted by the EEA Joint Committee

With reference to EEA Joint Committee Decision No 25/2008 of 14 March 2008, the EEA Joint Committee is invited to note the following lists concerning authorisation decisions adopted on the basis of Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) for the period 1 July–31 December 2015, at their meeting on 18 March 2016.

---

ANNEX

List of authorisation decisions

The following authorisation decisions in accordance with Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) have been taken in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 July–31 December 2015:

| Substance name | Commission decision under Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 | Country | Date of decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) | C(2015) 1619 final | Iceland | 13 August 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 3524 final | Iceland | 13 August 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6004 | Norway | 14 September 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6004 | Liechtenstein | 21 October 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6004 | Iceland | 2 November 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6007 | Norway | 14 September 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6007 | Liechtenstein | 21 October 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6007 | Iceland | 2 November 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6063 | Norway | 14 September 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6063 | Liechtenstein | 21 October 2015 |
| Diarsenic trioxide | C(2015) 6063 | Iceland | 2 November 2015 |
| Trichloroethylene | C(2015) 8093 | Norway | 2 December 2015 |
| Trichloroethylene | C(2015) 8093 | Liechtenstein | 14 December 2015 |

Substance name

Commission decision under Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

Country

Date of decision

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP)

C(2015) 1619 final

Iceland

13 August 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 3524 final

Iceland

13 August 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6004

Norway

14 September 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6004

Liechtenstein

21 October 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6004

Iceland

2 November 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6007

Norway

14 September 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6007

Liechtenstein

21 October 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6007

Iceland

2 November 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6063

Norway

14 September 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6063

Liechtenstein

21 October 2015

Diarsenic trioxide

C(2015) 6063

Iceland

2 November 2015

Trichloroethylene

C(2015) 8093

Norway

2 December 2015

Trichloroethylene

C(2015) 8093

Liechtenstein

14 December 2015

---
§ 303.182 Establishing, moving or closing a foreign branch of an insured state nonmember bank. ( a ) *Notice procedures for general consent.* Notice in the form of a letter from an eligible depository institution establishing or relocating a foreign branch pursuant to § 347.117(a) of this chapter must be provided to the appropriate FDIC office no later than 30 days after taking such action. The notice must include the location of the foreign branch, including a street address. The FDIC will provide written acknowledgment of receipt of the notice.
( b ) *Filing procedures for other branch establishments* — ( 1 ) *Where to file.* An applicant seeking to establish a foreign branch other than under § 347.117(a) of this chapter shall submit an application to the appropriate FDIC office.
( 2 ) *Content of filing.* A complete letter application must include the following information: ( i ) The exact location of the proposed foreign branch, including the street address.
( ii ) Details concerning any involvement in the proposal by an insider of the applicant, as defined in § 303.2(u) of this part, including any financial arrangements relating to fees, the acquisition of property, leasing of property, and construction contracts;
( iii ) A brief description of the applicant's business plan with respect to the foreign branch; and
( iv ) A brief description of the proposed activities of the branch and, to the extent any of the proposed activities are not authorized by § 347.115 of this chapter, the applicant's reasons why they should be approved.
( 3 ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information to complete processing.
( c ) *Processing* — ( 1 ) *Expedited processing for eligible depository institutions.* An application filed under § 347.118(a) of this chapter by an eligible depository institution as defined in § 303.2(r) of this part seeking to establish a foreign branch by expedited processing will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC and will receive expedited processing, unless the applicant is notified in writing to the contrary and provided with the basis for that decision. The FDIC may remove the application from expedited processing for any of the reasons set forth in § 303.11(c)(2) of this part. Absent such removal, an application processed under expedited processing is deemed approved 45 days after receipt of a substantially complete application by the FDIC, or on such earlier date authorized by the FDIC in writing.
( 2 ) *Standard processing.* For those applications that are not processed pursuant to the expedited procedures, the FDIC will provide the applicant with written notification of the final action when the decision is rendered.
( d ) *Closing.* Notices of branch closing under § 347.121 of this chapter, in the form of a letter including the name, location, and date of closing of the closed branch, shall be filed with the appropriate FDIC office no later than 30 days after the branch is closed.
[70 FR 17558, Apr. 6, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 72555, Nov. 13, 2020]
# C_2016480EN.01000602.xml

| 22.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/6

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Fürstliches Obergericht dated 4 November 2015 in the criminal proceedings against A

(Case E-26/15)

(2016/C 480/08)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 4 November 2015 from the Fürstliches Obergericht (Princely Court of Appeal), which was received at the Court Registry on 9 November 2015, for an Advisory Opinion in the criminal proceedings against A on the following questions:

| 1. | Must Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing be interpreted as meaning that ‘trust and company service providers’, within the meaning of Article 2(1)(3)(c) and point (7)(b) of Article 3 of that Directive, are subject to the obligation to verify the customer’s identity as specified in Article 8(1)(a) and Article 9(1) and (6) of the Directive solely in accordance with the legislation of the Member State in which they are established (in welchem [der Dienstleister für Trusts und Gesellschaften] seinen rechtlichen Sitz hat)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing be interpreted as meaning that ‘trust and company service providers’, within the meaning of Article 2(1)(3)(c) and point (7)(b) of Article 3 of that Directive, are subject to the obligation to verify the customer’s identity as specified in Article 8(1)(a) and Article 9(1) and (6) of the Directive solely in accordance with the legislation of the Member State in which they are established (in welchem [der Dienstleister für Trusts und Gesellschaften] seinen rechtlichen Sitz hat)?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the negative: what criteria must be used to determine whether ‘trust and company services providers’ are under the obligation to verify the customer’s identity as specified in Article 8(1)(a) and Article 9(1) and (6) of the Directive in accordance with the legislation of another Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the negative: what criteria must be used to determine whether ‘trust and company services providers’ are under the obligation to verify the customer’s identity as specified in Article 8(1)(a) and Article 9(1) and (6) of the Directive in accordance with the legislation of another Member State?

| 3. | Do the answers to Questions 1 and 2 also apply where the company for which administrative services are provided is a company not incorporated in a Member State? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Do the answers to Questions 1 and 2 also apply where the company for which administrative services are provided is a company not incorporated in a Member State?

---
# C_2021457EN.01000501.xml

| 11.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/5

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2021/C 457/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 7 July 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85345 |
| Decision No | 172/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | University summer courses |
| Form of aid | No aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

7 July 2021

Case No

85345

Decision No

172/21/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

University summer courses

Form of aid

No aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q forRFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of RuvaneFund Management Corporation, the general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund  L.P., that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofRFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.

| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | By:   /s/  Robert L. Lerner                                                       

President

Ruvane Fund Management Corporationthe general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
Exhibit 4.15




                                December 8, 1999

Elcom International, Inc.
10 Oceana Way
Norwood, Massachusetts 02062

Attention:        Robert J. Crowell, Chairman and
                  Chief Executive Officer

Dear Bob:

         Following Jim Rousou's  retirement  from the Board of Directors we have
considered whether, in light of our requirements to trade freely in the stock of
ELCO, we should  appoint an  alternative  representative.  We know that you will
understand  our  decision  to  renounce  our right to appoint an Observer to the
Board of Directors of Elcom  International as provided for under the Amended and
Restated  Lantec  Stockholders  Agreement  that we entered into  effective as of
April 6,  1996.  This  letter  will  constitute  a  renouncement  of that  right
effective as of December 16, 1999,  and may be signed in multiple  counterparts,
each of which  shall be  deemed an  original,  but all of which  together  shall
constitute the same document. We trust that our relationship will continue to be
an amicable and mutually beneficial one.

                                               Sincerely,

                                               /s/ James Rousou
                                               James Rousou


                                               Control Investments Limited


                                               By: /s/ David G. Goar
                                               Its Director

                                               Best Investments Limited


                                               By:  /s/ David G. Goar
                                               Its Director


                                               Champion Investments Limited


                                               By:  /s/ David G. Goar
                                               Its Director
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 4.27


                         NHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               6663 Owens Drive
                             Pleasanton, CA 94588
                                (925) 251-3300

                                  June 30, 2000


Kedrick Investments Limited
C/o Dr. Dr. Batliner & Partner
Aeulestrasse 74
FL-9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein
Attn.: Mr. Hans Gassner

         RE: AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Gentlemen:

                  Reference is made to that certain Common Stock Purchase
Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), dated May 24, 2000, between NHancement
Technologies Inc., (the "Company") and Kedrick Investments Limited (the
"Purchaser"). Section 7.2(a) of the Purchase Agreement, as currently
constituted, provides that the Purchaser may terminate the Purchase Agreement in
the event that the Company completes any financing prohibited by Section 4.11.
The Company and the Purchaser hereby agree to delete said provisions from the
Purchase Agreement.

                  In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to
restate the following section of the Purchase Agreement as follows:

                  Section 7.2  OTHER TERMINATION.  The Purchaser may terminate
         this Agreement upon one (1) Trading Day's notice if (i) an event
         resulting in a Material Adverse Effect has occurred, (ii) the Common
         Stock is de-listed from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market unless such
         de-listing is in connection with the listing of the Common Stock on the
         Nasdaq National Market, American Stock Exchange, or the New York Stock
         Exchange, (iii) the Company files for protection from creditors under
         any applicable law, or (iv) the Registration Statement is not effective
         by August 31, 2000.

                  Except as specifically amended by the terms of this letter,
the Purchase Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect, and
shall not be in any way

<PAGE>

changed, modified or superseded by the terms set forth herein. All terms used
but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings set forth in the
Purchase Agreement.

                  If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding and
agreement, please so indicate by signing where indicated below.

                                                 NHANCEMENT  TECHNOLOGIES INC.

                                                 By:
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                        Name:
                                                        Title:

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

KEDRICK INVESTMENTS LIMITED

By:
    -----------------------------------------
     Hans Gassner, Authorized Signatory


                                       2