alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources
Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter
Frugone


Peter
Frugone





Date: August
19, 200 9.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on February 12, 2009, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
    - January 8, 2009.

B. New Business
    - Spring 2009 Abstract of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and Spring 2009 Regulatory Performance Plan.

C. Reports
    - Office of Management Services Quarterly Report.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. E9-2463 Filed 2-2-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
42497.

#### P. & O. MACHINE WORKS, INC. v. POLLARD.

Deen, Judge.

1. While parol evidence, even though admitted without objection, of agreements and stipulations made prior to the execution of the written instrument has no probative value so as to alter or vary its terms *(Cleghorn v. Shields,*165 Ga. 362 (141 SE 55)), parol evidence is admissible to prove a new and distinct subsequent agreement *(Code*§ 38-507) or modification of the original agreement *(Covington v. Brewer,*101 Ga. App. 724 (115 SE2d 368)), provided it is supported by a consideration. *Wimberly v. Tanner,*34 Ga. App. 313 (1) (129 SE 306); *Collier Estate v. Murray,*145 Ga. 851 (1) (90 SE 52); *Long Tobacco Harvesting Co. v. Brannen,*98 Ga. App. 142, 149 (105 SE2d 390).

2. Plaintiff sold the defendant a business, the bill of sale including “all assets” and “all materials in stock.” There were at the time physically on the premises certain materials *97which had been specially ordered by the seller for fabrication into splined shafts to be made to the specifications of Owens-Richards Company, a purchaser, and which materials were not regularly kept in stock. This order and others were incomplete at the time of the sale of the business. According to the testimony of the plaintiff and another witness, it was agreed by the parties that the seller would remain on until he had completed the pending contracts. He remained for about a month, finishing 25 or 30 contracts. It became apparent to him that he would be unable to finish the Owen-Richards contract by the time shafts were demanded; he thereupon entered into a parol agreement with the defendant’s agent that the defendant would complete the contract, collect for the job, and pay plaintiff for the shafts $220.74, the purchase price of the material to him.

*Frankum, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.*

Submitted January 9, 1967

Decided January 25, 1967.

*Richard T. Cowan,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Falligant, Jr.,*for appellee.

This testimony, accepted as true by the court trying the case without a jury, authorized a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the value of the material as against the contention that it was an attempt to vary the terms of a written instrument by parol.

*Judgment affirmed.*
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

USGS Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program

##### U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1059

| **Title Page**   IntroductionGeologic SettingMethodsBathymetric OverviewInterpretationData CatalogAcknowledgmentsReferencesList of FiguresContacts | Geologic Interpretation and Multibeam Bathymetry of the Sea floor in Southeastern Long Island Sound 
**Published 2006**

**Collaborators:**

**by Lawrence J. Poppe¹, Seth D. Ackerman¹, Elizabeth F. Doran², Marc S. Moser³, Helen F. Stewart³, Nicholas A. Forfinski³, Uther L. Gardner³, and Jennifer A. Keene³**

¹U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Science Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543² Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT 06106³Atlantic Hydrographic Branch, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Norfolk, VA 23510

Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey |		Coastal and Marine Geology		URL: cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/publications/of2006-1059/index.html		Page Contact Information: CMGDS Team		Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 06-Dec-2017 12:59:25 EST
EXHIBIT 21


                          TURBOSONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                            State of
Name                                      Incorporation           % Ownership
----                                      -------------           -----------

Sonic Fabricating, Inc.                   Delaware                   100%

Sonic Thermal Systems, Inc.               Delaware                    80%

Euthenergy International, Inc.            Delaware                    80%

TurboSonic Canada, Inc.                   Canada (Ontario)           100%

Turbotak Technologies, Inc.               Canada (Ontario)           100%

TurboSonic, Inc.                          Canada (Ontario)           100%

Turbotak USA Inc.                         Michigan                   100%
SCALE 1:24,000

HEATH QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Heath Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1961.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Geology mapped by Hatch and Hartshorn (1968). Some

postglacial units mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 1 of 24)

(R

O

WE)

(C

OLRAIN)

(JACKSONVILLE)

(ASHFIELD)

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.

72°45'0"W

72°45'0"W

72°52'30"W

72°52'30"W

42°45'0"N

42°45'0"N

42°37'30"N

42°37'30"N
#### § 327.9 [Reserved]
# C_2014400EN.01001201.xml

| 13.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/12

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2014/C 400/04

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 9 July 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 72806 |
| Decision No | : | 272/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Icelandair ehf. |
| Type of measure | : | Purchase of airline tickets by the Icelandic State through various framework agreements with Icelandair |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ríkiskaup (State Trading Centre) |
| Borgartúni 7 |
| P.O. Box 5100 |
| 125 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

9 July 2014

Case number

Case number

:

72806

Decision No

Decision No

:

272/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Icelandair ehf.

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Purchase of airline tickets by the Icelandic State through various framework agreements with Icelandair

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ríkiskaup (State Trading Centre)

Borgartúni 7

P.O. Box 5100

125 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3046 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3046

 To correct and improve the prohibition against terrorism transcending 
              national boundaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2003

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To correct and improve the prohibition against terrorism transcending 
              national boundaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorism Transcending National 
Boundaries Correction Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO DEFINITION USED IN ``TERRORISM 
              TRANSCENDING NATIONAL BOUNDARIES'' STATUTE.

    Section 1958 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``facility in'' and 
        inserting ``facility of''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``or foreign'' after 
        ``interstate''.
                                 <all>
```
BILL OF EXCEPTIONS — NEW TRIAL.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

September Term, 1894.]

Bentley, Scribner and Haynes, JJ.

#### Samuel Montgomery v. State of Ohio.

1. Bill of Exceptions Must Embody Affidavits.

Affidavits filed with a motion for a new trial must be embodied in the bill of exceptions in order to have them become part of the record.

2. An Court Appellate will not Act on an Affidavit for and against a New Trial.

An appellate court will not be disposed to disturb the ruling of the trial court upon a motion for a new trial, based simply upon an affidavit on one side and affidavit denying upon the other.

*Mr. L. M. Murphy,*for defendant in error.

*Mr. Chas. E.*Sumner, assistant prosecuting attorney for State.

Haynes, J.

In this case, a petition in error was filed in this court to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas, in the conviction upon the indictment that was returned by the grand jury against Samuel Montgomery for an alleged asault and battery upon one Hannan (Feitz). A motion for a new trial was filed, on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, on the ground of newly discovered evidence material to the defendant which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial and that the verdict is contrary to law. On this second ground of the motion the affidavit was filed of Mrs. J. A. McCune, stating certain matters which were denied by Mrs. Feitz.

Two affidavits were filed and submitted, but the court overruled the motion on that point, as well as on the others. That is urged upon the part of the counsel, in the argument of this case, as a ground for a new trial which cannot be considered by this court, for the reason that the evidence is not properly before us. A rather common erroris, that after a motion of that kind is filed and affidavits have been filed, that the affidavits come up with the papers in the case and as part of the record.

We have had on other occasions in other counties, to pass upon this question. The only way these affidavits can properly be brought before the court is by bill of exceptions, otherwise they become no part of the record. It is sufficient to say that if they had been before us, we have simply an affidavit upon one side and an affidavit denying upon the other, and we are not disposed to hold that the court erred in refusing a new trial upon those.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08499**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 08499\08499_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08499\08499_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 08499\08499_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 08499\08499_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08499\08499_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08499\08499_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08499\08499_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08499\08499_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08499\Certification Statement Plant ID 08499.pdf Plant certification statement 08499\Supplemental Documents\08499_Monticello Plant Area Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08499\Supplemental Documents\08499_Monticello Property Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08499\Supplemental Documents\08499_WB-1 MOSES_water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2015049EN.01001501.xml

| 12.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 9 May 2014

in Case E-23/13

Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC)

(Directive 2003/6/EC — Admissibility — Judicial or administrative function — Information request — Requirement in national law to set out the facts that give rise to the suspicion)

(2015/C 49/08)

In Case E-23/13 Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice from the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein (Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein) concerning the interpretation of Article 16 of Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse), the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 9 May 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:

Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein

A requirement that obliges the authority requesting information in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2003/6/EC to specify the facts giving rise to the suspicion is not compatible with Directive 2003/6/EC.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                              343,928
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     4,367,792
<ALLOWANCES>                      2,065,255
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,764,045
<PP&E>                            1,270,080
<DEPRECIATION>                      462,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,566,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,846,054
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                             86,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               197,535
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                        2,843,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,566,031
<SALES>                           3,949,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  3,949,603
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,741,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   15,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (824,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (827,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (827,122)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.10)

</TABLE>
# L_2021318EN.01000401.xml

| 9.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/4

---

Corrigendum to EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 22 April 2021 approving the disease-free status of rabies virus (RABV) of Norway and amending Decision No 032/21/COL [2021/1333]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 12 August 2021
  )

On the cover page, and on page 11, in the title:

for:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision of 22 April 2021 approving the disease-free status of rabies virus (RABV) of Norway and amending Decision No 032/21/COL [2021/1333]’,

read:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 33/21/COL of 22 April 2021 approving the disease-free status of rabies virus (RABV) of Norway and amending Decision No 32/21/COL [2021/1333]’.

---
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

COMPENSATION INFORMATION WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

Medivation, Inc. 
 Cash
Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
  

					
	 Annual Retainer, all members
		$	50,000	  
	 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman
		$	50,000	  
	 Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs:
				
	 Audit Committee
		$	25,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
		$	20,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
		$	15,000	  
	 Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Members:
				
	 Audit Committee
		$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
		$	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
		$	7,500	  

 Medivation, Inc. 

Equity Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 

Upon initial election to the Board of Directors, each non-employee director receives an initial grant of equity equal to a Black-Scholes value
of $525,000, split equally between stock options and restricted stock units. The stock option has an exercise price per share equal to the closing sales price of a share of Medivation’s common stock on the date of grant. The stock option vests
over four years, with 25% of the shares vesting on the one year anniversary of the date of grant, and the remainder vesting monthly in 36 equal installments over the next three years. The restricted stock unit vests with respect to 1/3 of the shares
on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the vesting date as determined based on Mediation’s company policy. 
 Each
non-employee director receives an additional annual grant of equity equal to a Black-Scholes value of $350,000, split equally between stock options and restricted stock units. The stock option has an exercise price per share equal to the closing
sales price of a share of Medivation’s common stock on the date of grant. Both stock options and restricted stock units received from an annual grant vest the earlier of one year from the date of grant or the next annual shareholder meeting.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00415

- CR

Gilberto CARREON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR3963

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 14, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice