Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules 72885 

(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section and, where 

necessary, terminating the 

correspondent account, except to the 

extent that such indirect access to the 

correspondent accounts is necessary to 

conduct transactions involving Iranian 

banking institutions that are: (1) 

Authorized pursuant to Executive 

Orders issued under IEEPA or pursuant 

to 31 CFR Chapter V, including 

transactions authorized by the Office of 

Foreign Assets Control; (2), exempted 

from the prohibitions of such authority; 

or (3) not prohibited by such authority. 

(3) Recordkeeping and reporting. 

(i) A covered financial institution is 

required to document its compliance 

with the notice requirement set forth in 

paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section. 

(ii) Nothing in this section shall 

require a covered financial institution to 

report any information not otherwise 

required to be reported by law or 

regulation. 

Dated: November 18, 2011. 

James H. Freis, Jr., 

Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement 

Network. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30331 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–02–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0017–201014(b) & 

EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0018–201001(b); 

FRL–9495–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans: South 

Carolina; Negative Declarations for 

Groups I, II, III and IV Control 

Techniques Guidelines; and 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

several State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions submitted by the South 

Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control (SC DHEC). 

These revisions establish reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) 

requirements for the three major sources 

located in the portion of York County, 

South Carolina that is within the bi-state 

Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North 

Carolina-South Carolina 1997 8-hour 

ozone nonattainment area that either 

emit volatile organic compounds, 

nitrogen oxides or both. The bi-state 

Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill 1997 8- 

hour ozone nonattainment area is 

hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘bi-state 

Charlotte Area.’’ In addition, South 

Carolina’s SIP revisions include 

negative declarations for certain source 

categories for which EPA has control 

technique guidelines, meaning that SC 

DHEC has concluded that no such 

sources are located in that portion of the 

nonattainment area. EPA has evaluated 

the proposed revisions to South 

Carolina’s SIP, and has preliminarily 

concluded that they are consistent with 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

and EPA guidance. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before December 28, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2010–0017 and EPA–R04–OAR– 

2010–0018 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0017’’ 

for comments regarding the RACT 

demonstration and the negative 

declarations for Groups I and I CTG. 

‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0018’’ for 

comments regarding the negative 

declarations for Groups III and IV CTG. 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri 

Farngalo, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Zuri 

Farngalo may be reached by phone at 

(404) 562–9152 or by electronic mail 

address farngalo.zuri@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

12, 2008, EPA issued a revised ozone 

NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436. EPA 

subsequently announced a 

reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, 

and proposed new 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS in January 2010. See 75 Fr 

2938. In September 2011, EPA withdrew 

the proposed reconsidered NAAQS and 

began implementation of the 2008 

NAAQS. The current action, however, is 

being taken to address requirements 

under the 1997 ozone NAAQS for a 

portion of York County, South Carolina. 

Requirements for the bi-state Charlotte 

Area under the 2008 NAAQS will be 

addressed in the future. 

For additional information see the 

direct final rule which is published in 

the Rules Section of this Federal 

Register. In the Final Rules Section of 

this Federal Register, EPA is approving 

the State’s SIP revision as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this document. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this 

document should do so at this time. 

Dated: November 7, 2011. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30297 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MM Docket No. 99–325; DA 11–1832] 

FM Asymmetric Sideband Operation 

and Associated Technical Studies 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission seeks 

comment on a request by certain private 

parties, identified below, that the 

Commission authorize voluntary 

asymmetric digital sideband power for 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1