alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.71 Definitions. ( a ) *Director* means a person who serves on the board of directors of a regulated institution, except that this term does not include an advisory director who: ( 1 ) Is not elected by the shareholders of the regulated institution;
( 2 ) Is not authorized to vote on any matters before the board of directors or any committee thereof;
( 3 ) Solely provides general policy advice to the board of directors and any committee thereof; and
( 4 ) Has not been identified by the Board or Reserve Bank as a person who performs the functions of a director for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) *Regulated institution* means a state member bank or a bank holding company.
( c ) *Senior executive officer* means a person who holds the title or, without regard to title, salary, or compensation, performs the function of one or more of the following positions: president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief lending officer, or chief investment officer. *Senior executive officer* also includes any other person identified by the Board or Reserve Bank, whether or not hired as an employee, with significant influence over, or who participates in, major policymaking decisions of the regulated institution.
( d ) *Troubled condition* for a regulated institution means an institution that: ( 1 ) Has a composite rating, as determined in its most recent report of examination or inspection, of 4 or 5 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System or under the Federal Reserve Bank Holding Company Rating System;
( 2 ) Is subject to a cease-and-desist order or formal written agreement that requires action to improve the financial condition of the institution, unless otherwise informed in writing by the Board or Reserve Bank; or
( 3 ) Is informed in writing by the Board or Reserve Bank that it is in troubled condition for purposes of the requirements of this subpart on the basis of the institution's most recent report of condition or report of examination or inspection, or other information available to the Board or Reserve Bank.
EXHIBIT 10.1

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF SHARES

The Board of Directors of the Company authorizes the Company to register Five
Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares of the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by filing a Form S-1 with the Commission. Further, the Board
has authorized the filing of Forms U-1 and U-2 with the appropriate regulatory
authorities of each state to comply with applicable Blue Sky laws.

I, Debra B. Krahling, Secretary of the Corporation, do hereby certify that the
above is a true and correct statement of the resolution unanimously approved by
the Board of Directors on February 26, 2000 and affix the corporate seal hereto.

DATED: February 26, 2000


(SEAL)   SciCorps, Inc.

       DEBRA B. KRAHLING
By: ___________________________________
       DEBRA B. KRAHLING
       SECRETARY
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Christine Jacobs,
      President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
                Report.






Date: May
                9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ M.
                Christine JacobsM.
                Christine JacobsChief
                Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Beverly Eaves Perdue 

Governor 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

USEPA, Region 4 

Sam Nunn Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Division of Air Quality 

Sheila C. Holman 

Director 

November 30, 2012 

Dee Freeman 

Secretary 

Subject: Withdrawal of Request for Approval of Certain Rule Amendments 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

On September 18, 2009 and November 9, 2010, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality submitted 

amendments to 15A NCAC 02D .0952, Petition for Alternative Controls for RACT, to clarify language 

(part ofNC-141) and update cross references (part ofNC-154), respectively. Based on discussions 

with your staff, North Carolina is withdrawing its request for approval of these amendments to these 

rules at this time. 

Please contact Joelle Burleson of my staff at (919) 707-8720 if you have any questions regarding this 

matter. 

Enclosures 

SCH/jbb 

c: Beverly Banister 

Scott Davis 

Lynorae Benjamin 

Nacosta Ward (hardcopy and CD) 

MichaelAbraczinskas 

Sushma Masemore 

1641 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 

217 West Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603 

Phone: 919-707·84011 FAX 919-715-0718 /Internet: www ncatr.org 

An Equal OpportunttyiAffirmative Action Employer 

Sincerely, 

Sheila C. Holman 

N2JThcarolina 

;vaturalllf
# C_2006057EN.01002501.xml

| 9.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/25

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2006/C 57/10)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections to the notified measure.

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 56846

Title: EFTA Surveillance Authority decision of 15 July 2005 on the notification of a new risk capital scheme: Nationwide Seed Capital Investment Companies

Objective: To increase the supply of seed capital

Legal basis: St.prp. nr.1 (2004-2005, Budsjett-innst. S.nr. 6 (2004-2005) and Budsjett-innst. S. nr. 8 (2004-2005

Duration: Up to 15 years

Budget: Subordinated loans of NOK 667 million (approximately EUR 81 million) and a loss-fund of NOK 167 million (approximately EUR 20 million)

---
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 21-0063

MICHAEL JOHN STALEY,

Petitioner,

v.

COMMANDER DAN O'FALLON, Warden,

Cascade County Regional Prison,

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time 

to and including April 13, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2021

03/12/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0063
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

[ESS LOGO]
March 20, 1998


Bob Woo
13160 Avila Court
Los Altos, CA 94022

Dear Mr. Woo:

We are pleased to make the following offer of employment to you:

Title:                VICE PRESIDENT
Department:           Video Conferencing
Reporting to:         Fred Chan

Compensation:

- Salary -            $7,000 SEMI-MONTHLY (annualized at $168,000).

- Stock Options -     200,000 shares vested under the terms of the 5-year
                      Incentive Option Plan, subject to approval by the Board of
                      Directors at the next meeting.

- Bonus Program -     In addition, you are eligible co participate in a Bonus
                      Program of up to $30,000 per year.

- Benefits -          Medical, Dental Vision and Life coverage effective the
                      first of the month following your start date. PPO coverage
                      requires a deduction from your paycheck. Medical and
                      dental coverage for eligible dependents is available at
                      25% of cost.

- At-Will Basis -     ESS is an at-will employer in accordance with the laws of
                      the State of California. You are free to leave at any
                      time, and similarly, the Company can terminate your
                      employment, with or without cause, at any time.

- Effective -         This offer will remain effective until March 27, 1998.

- Start Date -        On or before April 15, 1998.

Mr. Woo, we look forward to a positive response to our offer and to a mutually
beneficial, professional relationship. Please indicate your acceptance by your
signature and start date below.



/s/ R. Steven Gonia                        /s/ Bob Woo
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
R. Steven Gonia                            Candidate
Human Resources Director

                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Start Date


                  48401 Fremont Boulevard  -  Fremont, CA 94538
                  - TEL: (510) 492-1088    -  FAX: (510) 492-1098
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1992-D, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,447
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  45,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,867
<PP&E>                                         4,296,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,897,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,445,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,005
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,427,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,445,691
<SALES>                                        133,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,859
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  92,244<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,924)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,924)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
42726.

#### THOMPSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Submitted April 4, 1967

Decided May 16, 1967.

*725*Paul C. Myers,*for appellant.

*Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Scott Charlton,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

The controlling issue before this court is whether the Georgia Insurance Code entitles the plaintiff to bring an action within three years after written proof of loss is required, notwithstanding a two-year provision in the insurance policy. Although the plaintiff relies on *Code Ann.*§ 56-3105 (7), this requirement of the Georgia Insurance Code applies solely to blanket accident and sickness insurance, but *Code Ann.*§ 56-3108, requiring certain claims provisions of group accident and insurance policies to be not less favorable than those in individual policies, has the effect of imposing the same three-year requirement for group policies as set forth in *Code Ann.*§ 56-3004 (11). The Georgia Insurance Code became effective on January 1, 1961 *(Code Ann.*§ 56-115) and required compliance by persons acting as insurers in this State *(Code Ann.*§ 56-109), but it also allowed a minimum period of one year for the imposition of any requirement not existing under law in force immediately before the effective date. *Code Ann.*§ 56-110. As nothing appears in the petition to show that the group policy *726was issued subsequent to the effective date of the Georgia Insurance Code (in fact, the plaintiff concedes otherwise in his brief) and as the coverage became effective as to the plaintiff on October 1, 1961, within the grace period before the new requirements could become mandatory with respect to such a contract, the insured could rely on its right to enforce more restrictive limitations not contrary to laws previously in force.

Under these circumstances it is unnecessary to reach the issue of whether the three-year minimum limitation under the new law, if applied to an insurance contract already in force, would result in an unconstitutional application of a statute by impairing the obligation of a contract. See in this connection, however, *Code*§ 102-104; *Cutts & Johnson v. Hardee,*38 Ga. 350, 366; *George v. Gardner,*49 Ga. 441, 450; *Dixie Constr. Co. v. Williams,*95 Ga. App. 767, 769 (98 SE2d 582); Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628 (24 LE 365); Smith & Marsh v. Northern Neck Mut. Fire Assn., 112 Va. 192 (70 SE 482).

As the petition affirmatively discloses that the action is barred by the provisions of the contract on which it is based, the trial judge properly sustained a general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
# C_2020365EN.01000601.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 365/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85191 |
| Decision No | 089/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Amendment and renewal of the guarantee scheme for airlines |
| Legal basis | The Parliamentary Decision authorising the Guarantee scheme, in accordance with conditions proposed by the Ministry |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | The purpose of the guarantee scheme is to alleviate the liquidity shortage faced by the airline industry and ensure that disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak do not undermine the airlines’ viability. |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | Estimated NOK 6 billion |
| Duration | 31 October 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Airline industry |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency |
| Pb 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

10 July 2020

Case No

85191

Decision No

089/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Amendment and renewal of the guarantee scheme for airlines

Legal basis

The Parliamentary Decision authorising the Guarantee scheme, in accordance with conditions proposed by the Ministry

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

The purpose of the guarantee scheme is to alleviate the liquidity shortage faced by the airline industry and ensure that disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak do not undermine the airlines’ viability.

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

Estimated NOK 6 billion

Duration

31 October 2020

Economic sectors

Airline industry

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency

Pb 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                            In  connection with the Annual Report of Elephant & Castle Group Inc. (the “Company”)  on Form 10-K for the period ended December 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger  Sexton, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

                            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

                            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   | /s/      Roger Sexton                                                                                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Roger Sexton         Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer        (principal financial officer) |

Dated: May 10, 2005 

----
H. R. 2984

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order applicable

to pears.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PEAR MARKETING ORDERS.

Section 8c(7)(C) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C.

608c(7)(C)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended in the last sentence—

(1) by striking ‘‘or pears’’; and

(2) by striking ‘‘: Provided,’’ and all that follows through

‘‘be equal’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2016374EN.01000301.xml

| 13.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/3

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2016/C 374/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 25 May 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 78956 |
| Decision No | : | 124/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Municipality of Lista or MosjØen |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Individual aid in favour of Alcoa Norway ANS for the construction of a demonstration plant |
| Legal basis | : | The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid under the Energy Fund scheme, subject to a detailed assessment |
| Objective | : | Environment and innovation |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | 280 448 695 NOK |
| Intensity | : | 40,3 % |
| Duration | : | Aid will be distributed in the period 2016-2017 |
| Economic sectors | : | Primary aluminium production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Brochs gate 2 |
| N-7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

25 May 2016

Case No

Case No

:

78956

Decision No

Decision No

:

124/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Municipality of Lista or MosjØen

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Individual aid in favour of Alcoa Norway ANS for the construction of a demonstration plant

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Individual aid under the Energy Fund scheme, subject to a detailed assessment

Objective

Objective

:

Environment and innovation

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

Budget

:

280 448 695 NOK

Intensity

Intensity

:

40,3 %

Duration

Duration

:

Aid will be distributed in the period 2016-2017

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Primary aluminium production

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Brochs gate 2

N-7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---