alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 30319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12747]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9148]

Determination and Certification Under Section 40A of the Arms 
Export Control Act

    Pursuant to section 40A of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2781), and Executive Order 13637, as amended, I hereby determine and 
certify to the Congress that the following countries are not 
cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism efforts:

Eritrea
Iran
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North Korea)
Syria
Venezuela

    This determination and certification shall be transmitted to the 
Congress and published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 11, 2015.
John Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-12747 Filed 5-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVE SALVATIORE BRANA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2717

[June 15, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 431997CF001324C.

Leah H. Mayersohn of Mayersohn Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143273, 333-137498, and 333-75811) pertaining to
the 2005 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan for Thomas Group, Inc., the Thomas Group, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, and the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. and restated
1988 Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statement of Thomas
Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Hein &
Associates LLP
      Hein & Associates LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 26, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### § 1805.600 Notice of Funds Availability.

Each Applicant shall submit an application for financial or technical assistance under this part in accordance with the applicable Notice of Funds Availability published in the Federal Register. The Notice of Funds Availability will advise prospective Applicants on how to obtain an application packet and will establish deadlines and other requirements. The Notice of Funds Availability may specify the application scoring criteria and any limitations, special rules, procedures, and restrictions for a particular funding round. After receipt of an application, the CDFI Fund may request clarifying or technical information on the materials submitted as part of such application.
#### § 331.3 Application of host State law.

The laws of a host State shall apply to any branch in the host State of an out-of-State State bank to the same extent as such State laws apply to a branch in the host State of an out-of-State national bank. To the extent host State law is inapplicable to a branch of an out-of-State State bank in such host State pursuant to the preceding sentence, home State law shall apply to such branch.
# C_2010174EN.01001301.xml

| 1.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/13

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 174/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 16 December 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 66126 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | The Norwegian Energy Fund |
| Legal basis | : | Parliamentary proposition No 1 (2007-2008) and Parliamentary proposition No 37 (2008-2009) |
| Objective | : | Increase the supply of renewable heat and energy. Contribute to energy saving |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | Approximately NOK 2 516 million |
| Duration | : | Until end of 2010 |
| Economic sectors | : | Energy, electricity |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Brochsgt. 2 |
| 7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

16 December 2009

Case number

:

66126

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

:

The Norwegian Energy Fund

Legal basis

:

Parliamentary proposition No 1 (2007-2008) and Parliamentary proposition No 37 (2008-2009)

Objective

:

Increase the supply of renewable heat and energy. Contribute to energy saving

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

:

Approximately NOK 2 516 million

Duration

:

Until end of 2010

Economic sectors

:

Energy, electricity

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Brochsgt. 2

7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Richard B. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Robert W.
Weber, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Chief Accounting Officer and Vice PresidentOperations of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and



2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    RICHARD B.
HOLLIS                                                                                                          
|                      |  |     |  | Richard B. Hollis Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                              
|                      |  |    
|Dated: March 12, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    ROBERT W.
WEBER                                                                                                            
|                      |  |     |  | Robert W. Weber Interim Chief Financial Officer/Chief Accounting Officer/ Vice President, Operations
(Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This certification accompanies the Annual Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### OLD TENNENT CHURCH, A RELIGIOUS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR THOMPSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued January 16, 1940

Decided April 18, 1940.

Before Justices Trenchard, Case and Heher.

For the appellant, *Samuel Craig Cowart.*

For the respondent, *McDermott & Finegold.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal in this action of ejectment upon two grounds, viz.: (a) that the appeal has not been prosecuted in accordance with the rules of court, and (b) that appellant obtained and argued in the Common Pleas a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, without a reservation of exceptions, and the order discharging the rule is therefore *res judicata*in respect of the matters embodied in the exceptions.

*493Appellant counters with a motion for a *mandamus*requiring the trial judge "to settle the state of the case on appeal.”

The trial judge directed a verdict of possession in favor of respondent, and nonsuited appellant on his counter-claim for breach of contract; and judgment thereon was entered on October 3d, 1939. On the following day, the rule to show cause was allowed on appellant’s motion. There was no reservation of exceptions. On October 10th, the rule was discharged after hearing. The notice of appeal was filed the next day; and on the ensuing December 4th, the grounds of appeal were filed with the clerk of the lower court. Nothing has been done since.

It is conceded that the grounds of appeal were all embraced within the reasons assigned — and determined, also — on the motion for a new trial; and so we are constrained to dismiss the appeal, since the determination of the rule to show cause is a conclusive adjudication of the questions raised here. The subject-matter has thereby become *res judicata. Faragasso*v. *Introcaso,*98 *N. J. L.*583; *Goekel*v. *Erie Railroad Co.,*100 *Id.*279; *Margolies*v. *Goldberg,*101 *Id.*75; *Boniewsky*v. *Polish Home of Lodi,*103 *Id.*323, 335; *Catterall*v. *Otis Elevator Co.,*103 *Id.*381; *Stiles*v. *MacLean,*103 *Id.*537; *Cleaves*v. *Yeskel,*104 *Id.*497; *Ashhurst*v. *Atlantic Coast Electric Railroad Co.,*66 *Id.*16; *Holler*v. *Ross,*67 *Id.*60; *Clark*v. *Swersky,*3 *N. J. Mis. R.*432; *Atkins*v. *Wellman,*2 *Id.*282. See, also, *Finley*v. *Handley,*50 *N. J. L.*503; *Meeker*v. *Boylan,*27 *Id.*262.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed, and the motion for a *mandamus*denied, with costs.
<PAGE>   1


                        STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                  (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE              THREE
                                                              MONTHS             MONTHS
                                                              ENDED              ENDED
                                                             12/31/98           12/31/97
                                                             --------           -------- 
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>      
     BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

Weighted average of common stock outstanding                   12,427             11,420

Net Loss                                                     $(13,100)          $ (9,377)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements and accretion              (645)              (249)
                                                             --------           -------- 

Net loss used in basic loss per share                        $(13,745)          $ (9,626)
                                                             ========           ========

     BASIC LOSS PER SHARE                                    $  (1.11)          $  (0.84)
                                                             ========           ========

     DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Weighted average of common stock outstanding                   12,427             11,420

Total weighted average shares outstanding used in
     diluted loss per share computation (1)                    12,427             11,420

Net loss                                                     $(13,100)          $ (9,377)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements and accretion              (645)              (249)
                                                             --------           -------- 

Net loss used in diluted earning per share                   $(13,745)          $ (9,626)
                                                             ========           ========

         DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE (1)                          $  (1.11)          $  (0.84)
                                                             ========           ========
</TABLE>

     (1) Due to losses resulting in anti-dilution, same as amount used in basic
         computation.

                                       25
# L_2017045EN.01001401.xml

| 23.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 45/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 45/14

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES No 2/2016/SC

of 2 June 2016

amending Decision of the Standing Committee No 4/2004/SC establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee [2017/313]

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021,

Having regard to Protocol 38c on the EEA Financial Mechanism (2014-2021), inserted into the EEA Agreement by the aforementioned Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021,

Having regard to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2014-2021,

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2004/SC of 3 June 2004 establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee,

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 2/2015/SC of 24 September 2015 establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee for the period 2014-2021,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In Article 1 of the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2004/SC of 3 June 2004 the second sentence of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following wording: The Committee shall manage the EEA Financial Mechanism 2004-2009, the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 and the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2014-2021.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2016.

For the Standing Committee

Kurt JÄGER

Chair

Kristinn F. ÁRNASON

Secretary-General

---
# C_2017081EN.01000601.xml

| 16.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2017/C 81/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 1 December 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 79773 |
| Decision No | : | 216/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | Reduced rate of taxation on electricity directly provided to vessels |
| Legal basis | : | The Parliament’s yearly decision on electricity tax, the Act on Excise Duties of 19 May 1933 No 11, the Regulation on Excise Duties and the Act on Tax Payment of 17 June 2005 No 67. |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Tax advantage |
| Budget | : | Approx. NOK 2 million annually (expected to increase gradually) |
| Duration | : | 10 years, starting from 1 January 2017 |
| Economic sectors | : | Transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| P.O. Box 8008 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

1 December 2016

Case No

Case No

:

79773

Decision No

Decision No

:

216/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

Title

:

Reduced rate of taxation on electricity directly provided to vessels

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Parliament’s yearly decision on electricity tax, the Act on Excise Duties of 19 May 1933 No 11, the Regulation on Excise Duties and the Act on Tax Payment of 17 June 2005 No 67.

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Tax advantage

Budget

Budget

:

Approx. NOK 2 million annually (expected to increase gradually)

Duration

Duration

:

10 years, starting from 1 January 2017

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

P.O. Box 8008 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### § 313.181 Scope.

This subpart establishes FDIC procedures for the collection of civil money penalty debt.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Consumer Privacy - Letter December 2, 2013
7s9 ‘- 

Honorable I’ax Steroke, Page S 

9. That tb,e manawasnt or the Authority 

Is hereby lnatruoted by the diraotoca to notify 

all employee that ttiie right to oolleotlre bargaining la reoognlzed. w 

The Aot oreating the Lower Colorado 9lrer Authority oonferrr pouer upon the Boar61 

*(rn) To appoint oftioerr, agents and l laployeer, 

tvr;.yoribe their Qutisa and to fix their aompen- ” 

, 

Item 1 ot the Rerolutlon does no rare thq doolarr 

the present policy of the Board uith napeat to the pament 

of *ages. It merely embodies the attltutlr which t&o Bmrd, 

hae adopted in respeot to the matter of fixing the soapmation to be paid smploy~eo of the AIO.hority. Thie ir olrarlf 

within the power of the Board un&er Seation %P abevo quoted. 

Item a of the FMolutlon merely l tilrmlar that the 

pnrent. pollog tidopted by tha Board Is to raoognise the right 

of fto mployee* to organIt aad bargain oollrotitel~. No 

attempt Ia made ta bind the Beard, lrnrooabl.y, to a rtated 

:& 

course of aotlon oalaulatra ts d**trof or h~palr tho free 

y:; I exerolse QS the $&I-ant and dlmorotion ot the Board in re- 

” speot to the perfonnanoe of fte dutlm. (See our opinion 

so. tM6125) 

You are adrlre~;~thb~~~,,,ln cur opinion, the ‘*doptlon 

of rush Reedlutlon is ulthln thd’pouer oi the Board. 

YOUCI very truly 

, m 

/- - 

I?. w. Yalrohild 

k8418tant 

RWILM APPROVEDDEC 18, 1940
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

                                                
<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<CURRENCY>                            U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                      79,287
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              256,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,500
<INVENTORY>                                355,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           821,064
<PP&E>                                     391,902
<DEPRECIATION>                             507,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,349,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      304,923
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     9,868
<OTHER-SE>                               2,517,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,349,396
<SALES>                                    934,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           934,780
<CGS>                                      313,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              531,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             71,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                26,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         44,803
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                44,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .003
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2798 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2798

    For the relief of Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin Thomas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2003

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    For the relief of Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin Thomas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ms. 
Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin Thomas shall be held and 
considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 
permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 
payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ms. Gracekutty Thomas 
and her son Gladwin Thomas, as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate 
number during the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant 
visas available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under 
section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```