alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021475EN.01000501.xml

| 25.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/5

---

Fixing a continuation of a general review hearing

Case No 05 KO.2016.672

(2021/C 475/05)

| Bankrupt company: | Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, Alvierweg 2, 9490 Vaduz





  represented by: Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2, |
| --- | --- |
| 9490 Vaduz |

Bankrupt company:

Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, Alvierweg 2, 9490 Vaduz

represented by: Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2,

9490 Vaduz

in the matter of:

Bankruptcy proceedings

The general review hearing concerning the claims registered is hereby continued and fixed for

Monday, 20 December 2021, 9:30 a.m., hearing room 1

at the following court:

Princely Court of Justice

Vaduz, 30 September 2021.

Martina SCHÖPF-HERBERSTEIN

Judge of the Princely Court of Justice

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   July 26, 1999

Condev Land Growth Fund '86, Ltd.
Second Quarter 1999

Dear Limited Partner:

The financial statements of the Partnership for the second quarter of 1999 are
on the reverse side hereof. There were no sales of property and no distributions
to limited partners during the quarter. As of June 30, 1999, the net asset value
(book value) per unit of limited partner interest was $250.63.

The General Partner is making every reasonable effort to conclude the sale of
the remaining partnership properties as soon as possible.

In the case of the Titusville property, we have granted contract extensions to
                   ----------
allow the contract holder time to finalize arrangements with his prospective
tenant in the belief that having a user for the property will help assure that
the property is sold. This strategy appears to be a correct one. As of the date
of this report, the purchaser of the property has secured a commitment from his
tenant, and has made a non-refundable deposit on the property. Engineering of
the site has begun, and application for the required development permits is
underway.

With respect to the West Hwy 50, Lake County property, our strategy has been to
                    ------------------------
complete certain improvements to the property, such as the extension of sewer
and water service to the site, and construction of both on site and off site
access improvements. Access improvements include not only the roadway access to
the property, but also modifications to the turn lanes and medians along SR 50.
We are working with the Florida Department of Transportation and Lake County in
these endeavors. Because of the property's rolling terrain, we have made the
decision to do some preliminary grading of the site to bring the ultimate
development of the property closer to the market. We believe that these
improvements will better position the property for sale by reducing the time and
effort a potential buyer would have to undertake for development of the
property. We believe the added expense will ultimately be recovered through a
higher price for the land.

Please feel free to contact the Investor Relations office if you have any
questions or would like additional information concerning your investment.


Sincerely yours,


CONDEV ASSOCIATES
EPA REGISTRATION FILE

#1706-235 Vol. 2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

*Manufacturing process informatio

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
8
9
10

*Manufacturing process information ma

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
11
12
13
14
15
EPA REGISTRATION FILE #1706-235 Vol. 2

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 16 through 19 are not included in this copy. 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

 Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

 Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

X The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

 FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-Client work product. 

 Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.

_____ Personal Privacy Information

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact 

the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM HELMSTAR
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES'  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM 9
MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,097,271
<SECURITIES>                                24,676,452
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,773,723
<PP&E>                                      65,603,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                 412,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,050,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,633,903
<BONDS>                                     72,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,741,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,050,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,646,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,095,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,126,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,576,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,589,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,589,814)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
# C_2021141EN.01000401.xml

| 22.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/4

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2021

Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1)

(2021/C 141/04)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2021 – | 1,50 | - 0,61 | 0,34 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2021 –

1,50

- 0,61

0,34

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25 May 2006, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20468 Conference Calendar

LEWIS BROWN HODGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
HENRY KEENE; WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-4998

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. App. P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order from which appeal is taken.No. 96-20468 - 2 - The district court entered final judgment on April 5, 1996. Therefore, the final day for filing a timely notice of appeal was Monday May 6, 1996, because the thirtieth day was a Sunday. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). Hodge’s notice of appeal was dated May 8, 1996, and was not filed into the court record until May 13, 1996. Thus, it was filed after the prescribed appeal period. The time limitation for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional, and the lack of a timely notice mandates dismissal of the appeal. Robbins v. Maggio , 750 F.2d 405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985). Hodge’s motion for relief from further confinement is
DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
### EPA response to data adequacy review from Bruggemann Chemical on CASRN 149-44-0. Paul Campanella to: Ed.McDade 01/25/2012 09:30 AM Cc: Marcus Aguilar, John Schaeffer

Ed, Attached is the analysis of data submitted by Bruggermann Chemical . The results, presented in tabular form on page 29, indicate that all endpoints requested in the Final HPV Test Rule have been satisfied. EPA accepts these results and agrees that no further testing on these endpoints is needed.

HPV2 data adequacy Bruggemann chemical CASRN 149 44 0.pd f

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XS14


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 27, 2009, from 9 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn BWI Airport, 890 
Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090, telephone: (410) 
859-8400.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. 
New Street, Room 2115, Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. New Street, Room 2115, 
Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331, extension 19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is: (1) 
specification of Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) for spiny dogfish 
for the upcoming fishing year(s); (2) review of the Management Strategy 
Evaluation project and research priorities to address scientific 
uncertainty and development of ABC control rules for managed species, 
and (3) to discuss the role of the SSC members relative to stock 
assessment working groups and Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) 
Chairmanship.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to M. Jan Bryan at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office, 
(302) 674-2331 extension 18, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 5, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-24314 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
# C_2013229EN.01001601.xml

| 8.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/16

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2013/C 229/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 10 April 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 69933 |
| Decision number | : | 144/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Bergen Kirkelige Fellesråd |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Bergen Kirkelige Fellesråd |
| Bjørns gate 1 |
| 5008 Bergen |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

10 April 2013

Case number

:

69933

Decision number

:

144/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Bergen Kirkelige Fellesråd

Type of measure

:

No aid

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Bergen Kirkelige Fellesråd

Bjørns gate 1

5008 Bergen

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20071

JOSEPH CHHIM , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 2483

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joseph Chhim sought relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliation and discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin. The district court dismissed the suit , denied Chhim’s motion for reconsideration, and denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal , certifying that any appeal would be frivolous. Chhim now moves in this court for the appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed IFP.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 18, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20071 Document: 00512773836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2014No. 14

- 20071

By moving to proceed IFP, Chhim challenges the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). An appeal is taken in good faith if it raises legal points that are arguable on the merits and thus nonfrivolou s. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because Chhim’s motion for reconsideration was filed more than 28 days after the entry of final judgment, it did not restart the time limit for filing a timely notice of appeal from the dismissal of h is suit

. S ee F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(a)(4)(A)(vi)

. His notice of appeal was therefore timely only as to the denial of the motion for reconsideration, and his appeal from th e denial of his motion for reconsideration does not bring up the underlying judgment for review. See Bailey v. Cain , 609 F.3d 763, 767 (5th Cir. 2010). Chhim , however, presents no argument that the district court erred in denying his motion for
reconsideration . H e has therefore abandoned any arguments regarding that ruling. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 81 3 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Thus, Chhim has not established that he will raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue in connection with the denial of the motion

. See
Howard , 707 F.2d at 220. A ccordingly, we deny his motion to proceed IFP on appeal and dismiss his appeal as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24;
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Chhim’s motion for the appointment of counsel is likewise
denied. See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock Cnty., Texas , 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1991). 

### MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2 Case: 14-20071 Document: 00512773836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/18/2014
### Filed 8/1/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 208

In the Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Steven T. Rosso, a Pe rson Previously Admitted to the Bar of the State of North Dakota

No. 20190191

Recommendation for Reciprocal Discipline.
SUSPENSION ORDERED.
Per Curiam. [¶1] On June 18, 2019, the North Dakota Disciplinary Board notif ied the Supreme Court under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D) that it was recommend ing the reciprocal discipline of Steven T. Rosso. The record reflects that the Mi nnesota Supreme Court suspended Rosso for 12 months for failing to safeguard client f unds; failing to ensure accurate maintenance of the required trust account books and re cords; failing to review the activity in the pooled and individual client trust accounts or any of the reports generated for those accounts; failing to adequately sup ervise non-lawyer staff in the handling of client funds, which resulted in the misappro priation of client funds; failing to promptly disburse funds t o clients; negligent misapp ropriation of client funds; and accepting an improper personal loan from a client. The Minnesota Supreme Court conditioned reinstatement on successful completio n of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination and compliance with continuing legal education requirements.[¶2] Rosso was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on Octob er 5, 1994, and was licensed until December 31, 2017. Rosso did not pay his li cense fee for 2018 and
was listed with the State Board of Law Examiners as retired starting January 23, 2018. [¶3] On January 17, 2019, the North Dakota Disciplinary Board se rved notice under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(B) that a certified copy of an order of suspension was entered by the Minnesota Supreme Court was received. The notice informed Rosso he had 30 days to file any claim that imposition of the identic al discipline in North
Dakota would be unwarranted and the reasons for the claim. No r esponse was received from Rosso. On June 18, 2019, the Disciplinary Board filed its recommendation that Rosso be suspended for 12 months, with rein statement conditioned on completion of the Multistate Professional Respon sibility Examination and compliance with continuing legal education requirements. [¶4] The Court considered the matter, and [¶5] ORDERED, that Steven T. Rosso is SUSPENDED from the practi ce of law in North Dakota for 12 months, effective upon entry of judgment in this matter. [¶6] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Rosso must comply with N.D.R. L awyer Discipl. 6.3 regarding notice. [¶7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that reinstatement is governed by N .D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.5 and is conditional upon on successful compl etion of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination and complian ce with continuing legal education requirements. [¶8] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen

2
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 156 ) IV-C-12

3 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:59 AM Sheet 156 of 232P. 2

^ lDSr \< ' —\ 

# i55B . \ P«Ol fc ° UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s r / Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 2 2 JU L 198

8 Dr . Terr yYosi e Vic e Presiden t Healt h an d Environmen t America n Petroleu m Institut e 1220 L Street , N

W Washington , D

C 20005 Dea rTerry : Th e Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) i s currentl y evaluatin g informatio n o n vehicl e refuelin g emissio n contro l techniques . A s par t o fthi s informatio n gathering , EP Ahas contracte d (Contrac t No . 68-02-3060 ) wit h Pacifi cEnvironmenta l Services , Inc . t o gathe rcos t dat a relate d t o Stag e I I vapo rrecoveryInstallation s 1 n St . Louis . Gatherin g cos t informatio n regardin g Stag e I I i n St . Loui s 1 s Important , sinc e thi s i s th e lates t are a t o instal l Stag e I I equipment . I t i s ou runderstandin g tha t AP I i s currentl yconductin g a paralle l Stag e I I cos t study . Surve yform s wer e sen t t o thos e AP I membercompanie s 1 n th e St . Loui s are a subjec t t o th e vapo rrecoveryregulation , an d informatio n wa s requeste d regardin g equipmen t an d Installatio n costs . I n orde rt o compar e th e AP I cos t dat a t o a Stag e I I cos t mode l used b yEPA, w

e woul d lik e t o obtai n th e dat a collecte d throug h you rsurvey . Sinc e informatio n a s detaile d a

s possibl e 1 s needed fo rthi s purpose , w e woul d appreciat e receivin g a cop yo f th e ra

wcos t dat a submitte d b

yyou rmembercompanie s i n th e St . Loui s area . I f yo u fee l 1 1 1 s necessar yt o alla yconfidentialit yconcerns , Individua l servic e statio n name s an d location s ma

ybe deleted . Give n th e controvers ysurroundin g th e refuelin g contro l Issue , I a m sur e yo u ca n understan d ou rInteres t 1 n al l potentiall yusefu l data . I f yo u shoul d hav e an yquestion s concernin g th e abov e request , pleas e contac t m e a t (919 ) 541-5642 , o rStephe n Shedd a t (919 ) 541-5597 . Thank s fo ranyassistanc e yo u ca n provide . Sincerely , ^Ji m Weigol d Offic e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g

and Standard s cc : Bo b Norton , PE

S Stephe n Shedd , OAQPS/ES DP. 3



# V

- % 

## -Ha '*>*.'<• 

## oA 

### <? •*>. '4*0 . / >* &

J 7 ^

V '< 4 ^

• '•** . -0 . "-O

r % , 

### - v