alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 21

- 0395

L.B.

, Plaintiff

- Appellant

, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendant

- Appellees

.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CIVIL RIGHTS, WOMEN’S RIGHTS, AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF

- APPELLANT L.B.

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief filed

by the Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center, National Women’s Law

Center, Women’s Law Project, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection,

National Police Accountability Project, and Institute for Justice , and for good cause

shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Amicu s

brief must be filed before or simultaneously with Appellant’s opening brief on

appeal.

DATED this _____ day of October, 2021.

_________________________ Chief Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2021

09/30/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0395
#### § 303.20 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the procedures for applying for deposit insurance for a proposed depository institution or an operating noninsured depository institution under section 5 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1815). It also sets forth the procedures for requesting continuation of deposit insurance for a state-chartered bank withdrawing from membership in the Federal Reserve System and for interim institutions chartered to facilitate a merger transaction. Each bank that results from the conversion of a Federal savings association into multiple banks pursuant to section 5(i)(5) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. 1464(i)(5), is treated as a proposed depository institution or a de novo institution, as appropriate, for purposes of this subpart.

[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 2145, Jan. 14, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,430,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               93,616,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,731,000
<INVENTORY>                                 70,604,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           174,200,000
<PP&E>                                     215,784,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,236,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             684,148,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,444,000
<BONDS>                                    180,000,000
<COMMON>                                       429,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 29,320,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 225,239,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               684,148,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           610,959,000
<CGS>                                      570,178,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              570,178,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            63,560,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,634,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (45,155,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (12,052,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (33,103,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  95,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (938,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,421,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.94)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1747

___________________________ Stella Thomas lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: December 9, 2022 Filed: December 14, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Stella Thomas brought this action against her former employer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging multiple instances of racial and gender discrimination andretaliation. The district court 1 dismissed the action in June 2020 pursuant to a

stipulation of dismissal but granted Thomas’s motion to reopen after she rescinded the settlement agreement. After substantial discovery, the district court granted Wells Fargo’s motion for summary judgment. Thomas appeals, raising numerous issues. After careful review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thoroughOpinion and Order. See Stella Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., File No. 19-cv482, Opinion and Order (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2022); 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
# Europeiska unionens C 363I/9 se

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 363I |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 64 årgången9 september 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 363I

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

64 årgången9 september 2021

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | Rättelser |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Rättelse till Uppmaning att lämna in intresseanmälan för utnämning av en tillsynsansvarig för rättssäkerhetsgarantier inom ramen för utredningar som utförs av Europeiska byrån för bedrägeribekämpning (Olaf) – COM(2021) 20062 ( EUT C 279 A, 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

Rättelser

2021/C 363 I/01

Rättelse till Uppmaning att lämna in intresseanmälan för utnämning av en tillsynsansvarig för rättssäkerhetsgarantier inom ramen för utredningar som utförs av Europeiska byrån för bedrägeribekämpning (Olaf) – COM(2021) 20062 ( EUT C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

( EUT C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

Rättelser

| 9.9.2021 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CI 363/1

---

Rättelse till Uppmaning att lämna in intresseanmälan för utnämning av en tillsynsansvarig för rättssäkerhetsgarantier inom ramen för utredningar som utförs av Europeiska byrån för bedrägeribekämpning (Olaf) – COM(2021) 20062

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 279 A av den 13 juli 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Sidan 3, punkt 4, under ”Sista ansökningsdag”

| I stället för: | ”Sista ansökningsdag är den 9 september 2021. Onlineregistreringar ska ha slutförts klockan 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid).” |
| --- | --- |

I stället för:

”Sista ansökningsdag är den 9 september 2021. Onlineregistreringar ska ha slutförts klockan 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid).”

| ska det stå: | ”Sista ansökningsdag är den 23 september 2021. Onlineregistreringar ska ha slutförts klockan 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid).” |
| --- | --- |

ska det stå:

ska det stå:

”Sista ansökningsdag är den 23 september 2021. Onlineregistreringar ska ha slutförts klockan 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid).”

---
# C_2019097EN.01000301.xml

| 14.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/3

---

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement

(Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications)

(2019/C 97/03)

Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications), foresees that the EFTA States shall notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions they adopt with regard to the issuing of evidence of formal qualifications in the fields covered by Chapter III of the Act.

The Authority has the task to publish an appropriate communication indicating the titles adopted by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway for evidence of formal qualifications and, where appropriate, the body which issues the evidence of formal qualifications, the certificate which accompanies it and the corresponding professional title referred to in Annex V of the Act, points 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 respectively.

Since Norway has notified changes regarding titles of training courses in specialised medicine, the Authority publishes the present communication in accordance with Article 21(7) of the Act.

Titles of training courses in specialised medicine

Norway has notified the following changes of titles of training courses in specialised medicine (Annex V, point 5.1.3, to Directive 2005/36/EC):

| Country | Title
  Dental, oral and maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical and dental training) |
| --- | --- |
| Norge | |

Country

Title

Dental, oral and maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical and dental training)

Norge

| Country | Title
  Maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical training) |
| --- | --- |
| Norge | Maxillofacial kirurgi |

Country

Title

Maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical training)

Norge

Maxillofacial kirurgi

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00225-CR

Leonardo Molina

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCR-02011-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 29, 2021
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 12, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-551 Lower Tribunal No. 2019-26581 & DOH No. 2019-0164

________________ 

### Ricardo Gende, Appellant,
vs. 

### Department of Health, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the State of Florida Department of Health. Ricardo Gende, in proper person. Sarah Young Hodges (Tallahassee), Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellee. Before SCALES, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 147]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1138]]

Public Law 112-147
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To direct the head of each Federal department and agency to treat 
    relevant military training as sufficient to satisfy training or 
   certification requirements for Federal licenses. <<NOTE: July 23, 
                         2012 -  [H.R. 4155]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Veteran Skills 
to Jobs Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 38 USC 4114 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran Skills to Jobs Act''.
SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAINING FOR ISSUANCE 
                    OF A FEDERAL LICENSE.

    (a) In General.--The head of each Federal licensing authority shall 
consider and may accept, in the case of any individual applying for a 
license, any relevant training received by such individual while serving 
as a member of the armed forces, for the purpose of satisfying the 
requirements for such license.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``license'' means a license, certification, or 
        other grant of permission to engage in a particular activity;
            (2) the term ``Federal licensing authority'' means a 
        department, agency, or other entity of the Government having 
        authority to issue a license;
            (3) the term ``armed forces'' has the meaning given such 
        term by section 2101(2) of title 5, United States Code; and
            (4) the term ``Government'' means the Government of the 
        United States.
SEC. 3. <<NOTE: Deadlines.>>  REGULATIONS.

    The head of each Federal licensing authority shall--
            (1) with respect to any license a licensing authority grants 
        or is empowered to grant as of the date of enactment of this 
        Act, prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this Act 
        not later than 180 days after such date; and
            (2) with respect to any license of a licensing authority not 
        constituted or not empowered to grant the license as of the date 
        of enactment of this Act, prescribe any regulations necessary to 
        carry out this Act not later than 180 days after

[[Page 126 STAT. 1139]]

        the date on which the agency is so constituted or empowered, as 
        the case may be.

    Approved July 23, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4155:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-585 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            July 9, considered and passed House.
            July 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 253.6 Preemption. Pursuant to section 107 of the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, 12 U.S.C. 5806, this part supersedes any provision of any state or local law, statute, rule, regulation, or standard— ( a ) Relating to the selection or use of a benchmark replacement or related conforming changes; or
( b ) Expressly limiting the manner of calculating interest, including the compounding of interest, as that provision applies to the selection or use of a Board-selected benchmark replacement or benchmark replacement conforming changes.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3056 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To clarify the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coast 

Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys Unit P25 on Otherwise Protected Area P25P. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3056 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE 

2 COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the 2 maps subtitled ‘‘P25/ 

4 P25P’’ that relate to the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

5 Resources System unit designated as Coastal Barrier Re6 sources System Cedar Keys Unit P25/P25P and are in7 cluded in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Re8 sources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal 

9 Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), the map de10 picting the northernmost area of that unit is hereby re11 placed by another map relating to that unit entitled ‘‘John 

12 H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys 

13 Unit P25/P25P’’ and dated February 9, 2004. 

14 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

15 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

16 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

17 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

18 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 704 JACOB SMITH ,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 6 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 4 2021

02/04/2021
§ 263.93 Eligibility to practice. ( a ) *Attorneys.* Any attorney who is qualified to practice as an attorney and is not currently under suspension or debarment pursuant to this subpart may practice before the Board.
( b ) *Accountants.* Any accountant who is qualified to practice as a certified public accountant or public accountant and is not currently under suspension or debarment by the Board may practice before the Board.
# C_2017139EN.01003001.xml

| 4.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/30

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2017

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (1))

1

(2017/C 139/07)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2017 – | 6,18 | -0,50 | 1,29 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2017 –

6,18

-0,50

1,29

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement No 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

1

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10621 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Pavel Alberto Mejia,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 196

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Defendant

Appellant Pavel Alberto Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia has not filed a response.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 13, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10621 Document: 00516609928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2023No. 22

- 10621

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the ap peal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. C ounsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is therefore **GRANTED** and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein . T h is appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 22-10621 Document: 00516609928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2023
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cala Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") Joseph Cala, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date: July 17, 2014
By:
/s/ Joseph CalaJoseph CalaPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

                                 MICROCOM, INC.
<TABLE>
                                           CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                          FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995

                                                       (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                                                Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                                                ------------------    ------------------
                                                                                 1996       1995       1996       1995
                                                                                -------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                                                                             <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>    
Net income .................................................................    $   648    $ 3,088    $   929    $ 5,203
                                                                                =======    =======    =======    =======

Reconciliation of average number of shares outstanding to amount used in net
   income per share computation:
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding .........................     15,997     15,225     15,917     13,409
     Assumed exercise of stock options .....................................        551      1,298        878      1,205
                                                                                -------    -------    -------    -------
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
       as adjusted .........................................................     16,548     16,523     16,795     14,614
                                                                                =======    =======    =======    =======

Net income per share .......................................................    $   .04    $   .19    $   .06    $   .36
                                                                                =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

                                       12