alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3018

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit members of the Selected 

Reserve the use of Reserve Montgomery GI Bill education benefits for 

payment for licensing or certification tests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit members 

of the Selected Reserve the use of Reserve Montgomery 

GI Bill education benefits for payment for licensing or 

certification tests.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF RESERVE MONTGOMERY GI BILL EDU4 CATION BENEFITS FOR PAYMENT FOR LI5 CENSING OR CERTIFICATION TESTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 16131 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new subsection: 
2

•HR 3018 IH 

1 ‘‘(j)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the amount of edu2 cational assistance payable under this chapter for a licens3 ing or certification test described in section 3452(b) of 

4 title 38, is the lesser of $2,000 or the fee charged for the 

5 test. 

6 ‘‘(2) The number of months of entitlement charged 

7 in the case of any individual for such licensing or certifi8 cation test is equal to the number (including any fraction) 

9 determined by dividing the total amount of educational as10 sistance paid such individual for such test by the full-time 

11 monthly institutional rate of educational assistance which, 

12 but for paragraph (1), such individual would otherwise be 

13 paid under subsection (b). 

14 ‘‘(3) In no event shall payment of educational assist15 ance under this subsection for such a test exceed the 

16 amount of the individual’s available entitlement under this 

17 chapter.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2004, and 

20 shall apply to tests administered on or after that date.

Æ
H. R. 3124

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Geological Survey and the United

States Bureau of Reclamation located at 230 Collins Road, Boise, Idaho, as the

‘‘F.H. Newell Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Geological Survey and the

United States Bureau of Reclamation located at 230 Collins Road,

Boise, Idaho, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘F.H. Newell

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘F.H. Newell

Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ John E. Halnen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                             APR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                                     26,083,212
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               4,612,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (451,059)
<INVENTORY>                                                 2,513,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           36,189,273
<PP&E>                                                    141,192,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (18,745,893)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            161,482,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      19,180,626
<BONDS>                                                   100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        4,938
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              161,482,160
<SALES>                                                    44,835,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           44,835,543
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              35,567,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               97,170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          3,038,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             3,259,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                                1,116,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,143,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.42


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07941]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 36

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0948; Amdt. No. 36-30]
RIN 2120-AJ96

Stage 3 Helicopter Noise Certification Standards; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published in the 
Federal Register of March 4, 2014 a document adopting more stringent 
noise certification standards for helicopters that are certificated in 
the United States (U.S.). Inadvertently the incorrect amendment number 
was assigned. This document corrects the amendment number cited in the 
heading of the final rule.

DATES: This correction is effective April 14, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Haley, Office of Rulemaking, 
ARM-203, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-5708; fax (202) 267-5075; 
email ralen.gao@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published a document in the Federal 
Register of March 4, 2014 (79 FR 12040) as Amendment Number 36-29. In 
FR Doc. 2014-04479, Amdt. No. 36-29 is incorrect. This document 
corrects the amendment number published on March 4, 2014.
    In FR Doc. 2014-04479, beginning on page 12040 in the Federal 
Register of March 4, 2014, make the following correction:
    On page 12040, in the second column heading, correct the amendment 
number from ``36-29'' to ``36-30''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2014-07941 Filed 4-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# C_2015143EN.01000801.xml

| 30.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/8

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority notice on State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2015

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

(2015/C 143/09)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2015 – | 6,26 | 0,16 | 1,71 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2015 –

6,26

0,16

1,71

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3147 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3147

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in 
        Ogden, Utah, as the ``James V. Hansen Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in Ogden, 
Utah, shall be known and designated as the ``James V. Hansen Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James V. Hansen 
Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2012324EN.01001301.xml

| 25.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/13

---

Action brought on 2 June 2012 by Konkurrenten.no AS against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-5/12)

2012/C 324/11

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 2 June 2012 by Konkurrenten.no AS, represented by Jon Midthjell, advokat, Advokatfirmaet Midthjell AS, Grev Wedels plass 5, 0151 Oslo, Norway.

The Applicant requests the EFTA Court to:

| 1. | Annul the contested decision; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annul the contested decision; and

| 2. | Order the defendant and any intervener to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the defendant and any intervener to bear the costs.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support

| — | The Applicant is a privately owned company, incorporated in Norway. The company is active in the regional express bus market between the Southern and Central region in Norway. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Applicant is a privately owned company, incorporated in Norway. The company is active in the regional express bus market between the Southern and Central region in Norway.

| — | The Applicant seeks the annulment of ESA’s decision, as notified on 5 April 2012, which denies public access to the complete statement of content in ESA Case No 60510. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Applicant seeks the annulment of ESA’s decision, as notified on 5 April 2012, which denies public access to the complete statement of content in ESA Case No 60510.

| — | The Applicant claims that the EFTA Surveillance Authority:






  — | has infringed Article 2(1) RAD and Article 4(2) RAD by refusing to disclose a complete statement of content of file; and |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

The Applicant claims that the EFTA Surveillance Authority:

—

has infringed Article 2(1) RAD and Article 4(2) RAD by refusing to disclose a complete statement of content of file; and

| — | has infringed Article 16 SCA insofar as the contested decision failed to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

—

has infringed Article 16 SCA insofar as the contested decision failed to state reasons.

---
July 23, 2012

Docket Management Facility U.S Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No 8794B, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26039

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations parts 11.63 and 11.81, US Airways, Inc (US Airways) petitions the Administrator to amend Exemption No 8794B to extend the expiration date of the ex emption from October 31, 2012, to October 31, 2014, or other such future date as may be found acceptable. Exemption No 8794B, as amended, grants relief from 14 CFR part 121.434 (c)(1 )(ii) so as to a llow US Airways to substitute a qualified and aut horized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in §121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

This exemption has been used by US Airways for almost six years, and by several other airlines, with no negative impact. US Airway s continues to be in compliance with the conditions of the exemption to 14 CFR pa rt 121.434 (c)(1)( ii), and believes that extending Exemption No. 8794B, as stated, w ould have no adverse effect on safety.

Therefore, we respectfully request an exte nsion of Exemption No. 8794B for two years, or other appropriate regulatory relief.

US Airways suggests that good cause exists for waiving publication of notice of this petition in the Federal Register. The grant of exemption petitioned fo r here would not set a precedent, and the exemption would in all ways, other than the effective date, be identical to the exemption now in place. Delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the petitioner and to the public, as well.

4000 East Sky Harbor Blvd, FC-F SS, Phoenix, AZ 85034 (480 ) 693-4660 Fax (480) 693-4936SUMMARY

US Airways, Inc. petitions for an amendment to Exemption No 8794B to extend the expiration date of same, which permits US Airways to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC ) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in §121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

Please let me know if there is any further in formation you need for your review of this petition. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Captain Lyle Hogg Vice President, Flight Operations US Airways, Inc. 4000 East Sky Harbor Boulevard

FC-FSS Phoenix, AZ 85034
1

Rios, Gerardo

From: Steve Hill [SHill@sierraresearch.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:23 PM

To: Rios, Gerardo; David Jenkins (djenkins@apexpowergroup.com)

Cc: Kohn, Roger; Grubenstein@SierraResearch.com; Maggie Fitzgerald; Foster, Melissa A.; Hellwig, Kimberly J.; Moore, Steve

Subject: RE: Pio Pico PSD Permit Application: PM2.5 BACT Update

Attachments: PM2 5 BACT letter--correction.pdf

On August 16, 2013, Pio Pico submitted a letter (with enclosed discs containing electronic versions of source test reports) to EPA updating its analysis of BACT for 

the LMS100 combustion turbines at Pio Pico Energy Center. 

The letter contained a typo. The attached letter is a correction of that typo. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

--Steve Hill
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Draftenvironmental impact statement [electronic resource]: Elba III project.**** 
SuDocNumber:E2.11/2:0207 D
ItemNumber:0429-V-03(online)
CGPSystem Number:000602277
 
 
Cover Letter
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
 
Appendices:
 
 
 
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix I
Appendix J
Appendix K
Appendix L
Appendix N
 
 **
# C_2020418EN.01000601.xml

| 3.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 418/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26 August 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85190 |
| Decision No | 101/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Compensation to Icelandair for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Legal basis | Supplementary budget Act.
  The terms and conditions of the state guarantee will be set out in an agreement between the Treasury and Icelandair. |
| Type of measure | Ad hoc aid |
| Objective | To compensate Icelandair for damage suffered due to the cancellation or re-scheduling of its flights, as a result of the imposition of travel restrictions by Iceland and other countries, linked to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | State guarantee |
| Budget | USD 108 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | September 2020 to September 2025 |
| Economic sectors | Aviation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs |
| Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

26 August 2020

Case No

85190

Decision No

101/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Compensation to Icelandair for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak

Legal basis

Supplementary budget Act.

The terms and conditions of the state guarantee will be set out in an agreement between the Treasury and Icelandair.

Type of measure

Ad hoc aid

Objective

To compensate Icelandair for damage suffered due to the cancellation or re-scheduling of its flights, as a result of the imposition of travel restrictions by Iceland and other countries, linked to the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

State guarantee

Budget

USD 108 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration

September 2020 to September 2025

Economic sectors

Aviation

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004