alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed October 2, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00583

- CV

____________ DEAN SMITH , Appellant

V. MICHELE ANN SMITH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 33707



### O R D E R
The clerk’s record was filed September 27, 2018. Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the Enforcement order signed June 1, 2018. The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before October 17, 2018, containing the Enforcement order signed June 1, 2018.If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3147 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3147

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2004

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in 
       Ogden, Utah, as the ``James V. Hansen Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth Street in Ogden, 
Utah, shall be known and designated as the ``James V. Hansen Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James V. Hansen 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 208.40 Authority, purpose, scope, other supervisory authority, and disclosure of capital categories. ( a ) *Authority.* Subpart D of Regulation H (12 CFR part 208, Subpart D) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) under section 38 (section 38) of the FDI Act as added by section 131 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-242, 105 Stat. 2236 (1991)) (12 U.S.C. 1831o).
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart D defines the capital measures and capital levels that are used for determining the supervisory actions authorized under section 38 of the FDI Act. (Section 38 of the FDI Act establishes a framework of supervisory actions for insured depository institutions that are not adequately capitalized.) This subpart also establishes procedures for submission and review of capital restoration plans and for issuance and review of directives and orders pursuant to section 38. Certain of the provisions of this subpart apply to officers, directors, and employees of state member banks. Other provisions apply to any company that controls a member bank and to the affiliates of the member bank.
( c ) *Other supervisory authority.* Neither section 38 nor this subpart in any way limits the authority of the Board under any other provision of law to take supervisory actions to address unsafe or unsound practices or conditions, deficient capital levels, violations of law, or other practices. Action under section 38 of the FDI Act and this subpart may be taken independently of, in conjunction with, or in addition to any other enforcement action available to the Board, including issuance of cease and desist orders, capital directives, approval or denial of applications or notices, assessment of civil money penalties, or any other actions authorized by law.
( d ) *Disclosure of capital categories.* The assignment of a bank under this subpart within a particular capital category is for purposes of implementing and applying the provisions of section 38. Unless permitted by the Board or otherwise required by law, no bank may state in any advertisement or promotional material its capital category under this subpart or that the Board or any other Federal banking agency has assigned the bank to a particular capital category.
( e ) *Timing.* The calculation of the definitions of common equity tier 1 capital, the common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, the leverage ratio, the supplementary leverage ratio, tangible equity, tier 1 capital, the tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total assets, total leverage exposure, the total risk-based capital ratio, and total risk-weighted assets under this subpart is subject to the timing provisions at 12 CFR 217.1(f) and the transitions at 12 CFR part 217, subpart G.
[63 FR 37652, July 13, 1998, as amended by Reg. H, 78 FR 62282, Oct. 11, 2013; 80 FR 70672, Nov. 16, 2015]
EPA ICR No. 2487.01; OMB Control No. 2070-NEW

ATTACHMENT F

Survey for EPA Design for the Environment (DfE)

Post-Launch Awareness Test of New Visual Mark 

General Adult Population Survey

OMB Control No. 2070-NEW

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

The annual public burden for this collection of information is estimated at 0.17 hours per response for screened respondents, 2 

hours for respondents that participate in the focus groups, 0.33 hours per response for pre-launch consumer online survey 

respondents, and 0.17 hours per response for post-launch online survey respondents. Send comments on the Agency's need for 

this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, 

including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any 

correspondence. Do not send the completed application to this address.
Survey for EPA Design for the Environment (DfE)

Post-Launch Awareness Test of New Visual Mark 

General Adult Population Survey

1. Are you familiar with a labeling program implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) that enables consumers to select products that can help protect the 

environment and are safer for people, families, and pets?

- Yes

- No [SKIP to Q3] 

2. What is the name of the labeling program? [Open-ended]

3. For 15 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented a voluntary

labeling program that enables consumers to select products that can help protect the 

environment and are safer for families and pets. This labeling program, called “Design for 

the Environment” (DfE), evaluates human health and environmental concerns associated 

with traditional and alternative chemicals in a variety of products, including commonly used 

household cleaning products. Products that meet EPA’s DfE Standard for Safer Products are 

allowed to carry the DfE label. When you see the DfE label on a product it means the DfE 

scientific review team has screened each ingredient for potential human health and 

environmental effects and has determined the product contains only those ingredients that 

pose the least concern. 

The labeling program, previously called the “Design for the Environment” (DfE) Safer 

Product Labeling Program, recently changed its name to [NEW NAME]. 

Now that you have heard more about the labeling program, do you recall hearing or seeing 

anything about the EPA’s [NEW NAME] program?

- Yes

- No 

4. Have you seen this visual mark on any products you have purchased or 

seen on store shelves?

- Yes

- No 

5. Based on what you now know about the labeling program, how likely are you to use the 

EPA’s [NEW NAME] visual mark to help you select a product to purchase?

- Extremely likely

- Very likely

- Somewhat likely

- Slightly likely

Logo
- Not at all likely
#### Florence SCHUMAN et al *v.*Virginia MARTIN et al

75-194

531 S.W. 2d 26

Opinion delivered December 22, 1975

*Frank II. Cox,*for appellants.

*Troy R. Douglas*and *Hardin, Jes son & Dowson,*for appellees.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellees, claiming ownership by inheritance from their mother, brought this suit to quiet their title to two city lots in Forth Smith and to cancel a State tax deed issued to the appellants in 1949. The defendants did not rely upon their tax deed as being valid, but they did assert title as a result of having paid the taxes for more than seven successive years. After a trial the chancellor *5entered a decree granting the relief sought by the plaintiffs, subject to their reimbursing the defendants for the amount of their tax payments, with interest. For reversal the appellants rely, as they did below, upon the superiority of their title.

That the appellees originally acquired title by adverse possession is shown by the weight of the evidence. Their mother bought the property in 1945 or 1946 and occupied a small house upon it until her death in 1947. Possession was continued either by some of the plaintiffs themselves or by tenants until the house burned in 1955. Hence there was continuous possession for more than seven years, which of course ripened into title.

The appellants, however, paid the taxes annually from 1949 to 1972, with the exception of the year 1964, when the appellees paid them. It is now insisted that, after the house burned, the appellants acquired title by the payment of taxes, under color of title, upon unimproved and unenclosed land for seven successive years. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 37-102 (Repl. 1962).

The appellants are mistaken in their understanding of what constitutes “unimproved and unenclosed” land. Those words are used in Section 37-102. which requires payment of taxes for seven years under color of title. The companion statute, Section 37-103, requires payment of taxes for fifteen years without color of title and refers to “wild and unimproved” land. We have repeatedly held that the two statutes refer to the same conditions, “unimproved and unenclosed” being used interchangeably with “wild and unimproved.” See the discussion in *Schmeltzer*v. *Scheid*203 Ark. 274, 157 S.W. 2d 193 (1941). It is also settled that lands which have been improved cannot be said to be “wild and unimproved” until they have been allowed to revert to the wild state that existed • before the improvements were made. *Weston*v. *Hilliard.*232 Ark. 535, 338 S.W. 2d 926 (1960); *Moore*v. *Morris,*118 Ark. 516, 177 S.W. 6 (1915).

Here the two city lots in question did not revert to their original wild state. After the house burned the appellees paid someone to level off the lots. Thereafter a relative who lived *6next door to the property looked after it, keeping the grass mowed. There is no proof that the property was allowed to return to its natural state. Consequently the appellants cannot prevail upon the theory that they were paying taxes upon unimproved and unenclosed land, as that phrase has been interpreted through the years.

Affirmed.
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ- OW-20 10 - 0824 DCN CBM00 705 THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# C_2021396EN.01000801.xml

| 30.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/8

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(2021/C 396/08)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | — | Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

—

Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta

| — | Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Lakselv – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v.

| — | Stokmarknes – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Stokmarknes – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Stokmarknes – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Stokmarknes – Bodø v.v.

| — | Leknes – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Leknes – Bodø v.v.

| — | Svolvær – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Svolvær – Bodø v.v.

| — | Røst – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Røst – Bodø v.v.

| — | Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.

Period of validity of the contract

1.4.2022 – 31.3.2024

Deadline for submission of tenders

30.11.2021

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

The Norwegian Ministry of Transport

Find document - regjeringen.no

---
§ 238.66 Ongoing requirements. ( a ) *In general.* A savings and loan holding company with an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company is subject to the same requirements applicable to a financial holding company, under sections 4(l) and 4(m) of the Bank Holding Company Act and section 804(c) of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903(c)) as if the savings and loan holding company was a bank holding company.
( b ) *Consequences of failing to continue to meet applicable capital and management requirements.* A savings and loan holding company with an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company that fails to meet applicable capital and management requirements at § 238.63 is subject to the notice, remediation agreement, divestiture, and any other requirements described in § 225.83 of this chapter.
( c ) *Consequences of failing to continue to maintain a satisfactory or better rating under the Community Reinvestment Act at all insured depository institution subsidiaries.* A savings and loan holding company with an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company that fails to maintain a satisfactory or better rating under the Community Reinvestment Act at all insured deposit institution subsidiaries is subject to the activities limitations and any other requirements described in § 225.84 of this chapter.
( d ) *Notice and approval requirements for conducting financial holding company activities; permissible activities.* A savings and loan holding company with an effective election to be treated as a financial holding company may conduct the activities listed in § 225.86 of this chapter subject to the notice, approval, and any other requirements described in §§ 225.85 through 225.89 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

BBI Retail, LLC, a Florida limited liability company 

Jantzen Apparel Corp.,a Delaware corporation 

Jantzen, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

PEI Licensing, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Limited, a Non-resident Irish corporation 

Perry Ellis International Europe Limited, a Non-resident Irish corporation 

Perry Ellis Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Salant Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Salant Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Supreme International,Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Supreme Munsingwear Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation 

Supreme Real Estate I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company 

Supreme Real Estate II, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany 

Supreme Realty, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
# C_2014081EN.01001402.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/14

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT

of 12 November 2013

in Case E-22/13

Íslandsbanki hf. v Gunnar V. Engilbertsson

(Withdrawal of a request for an advisory opinion)

2014/C 81/15

REQUEST from Hæstiréttur Íslands (the Supreme Court of Iceland) requesting the EFTA Court to give an advisory opinion pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice,

the President of the Court gave order on 12 November 2013, the operative part of which orders:

Case E-22/13 to be removed from the Register.

---
```

                      BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 12, 2006

                                            /s/ Barton Heminover
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Barton Heminover
                                            Chief Financial Officer
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 3, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00175

- CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On April 14, 2022, r elator Department of Family and Protective Services filed an amended petition for writ of mandamus. After this court requested a response, r eal p arty in i nterest E.H. filed a response

. In accordance with our opinion issued t his date, we conditionally grant the

amended petition for writ of mandamus and order the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez to, within fifteen days of this order, issue a written order vacat ing the following provisions of its prior orders:

Paragraph 2.3 of the Ma rch 25, 2022 order requiring the Department to ‘identify and execute a child specific contract for any or all child placing agencies with therapeutic foster homes that can meet the child’s needs;’

Paragraph 3.2 of the April 19, 2022 order requiring the De partment to provide ‘an autism expert on site designated to be working . . . for all shifts mornings, evenings and night’ while E.H. remains placed at a hotel in Victoria, Texas; and

Paragraph 3.7 of the April 19, 2022 order requiring two Department empl oyees, Gina Kothe

- Gibson and Jennifer Gonzalez, ‘to report to . . . the deputy of the 45th Judicial District Court by 9 a.m. and . . . work from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. in the jury room each day until placement for the child is secured.’

The Honorable Mary Lou A lvarez is further ORDERED to file a copy of such written order

in this court within the designated fifteen

- day period

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(c).

The writ will issue only in the event we are informed Judge Alvarez has failed to comply

with this order.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201 3

- PA

- 01 215 , styled In the Interest of E.H., a Child , pending in the 288th

Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez signed the orders at issue in this proceeding.04

- 22

- 00175

- CV

- 2

- It is so ORDERED on August 3, 2022

.

____ ___________________________ Li za A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
# SMifes f

^ A( RL/ N ; F5; * • • - I \J:)'J ) i.Jr

-

••• •.:;: : ^ 3 " ' ?••

•3 2

Ma y10 , 201 1 Docket s - Docket s OS T96-196 0 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 40 0 Sevent h Street , S.W . Roo m P L 40 1 Washington , D.C . 2059 D RE : SkyWes t Airline s operate d I n partnershi p wit h Alask a Airline s - Famil yAssistanc e Progra m SkyWes t Airline s operate s i n partnershi p wit h Alask a Airlines . Thes e operation s ar e conducte d unde ra cod e shar e agreemen t wit h Alask a Airlines , an d wil l b e covere d unde rth e Alask a Airlines ' Famil yAssistanc e Plan . Th e Alask a Airlines ' Famil yAssistanc e Pla n o n fil e wit h you roffice , detail s coverag e a s require d b yth e amende d Aviatio n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Ac t o f199 6 (4 9 U.S.C . 113 6 an d 41113) , alon g wit h requirement s specifie d i n Visio n 100 . Alask a Airline s ha s entere d int o contrac t wit h Empathia , In c(formerl yNEAS , Inc) , fo rprovisio n o faviatio n disaste r respons e an d famil yassistanc e services . I n th e even t o fa n aviatio n acciden t o rincident , Empathia , In cwil l provid e th e followin g service s o n behal fo fAlask a Airlines :

•Nex t o fKi n Notificatio n Th e Alask a Airline s Emergenc yRespons e pla n outline s responsibilitie s i n addressin g th e airlin e victi m suppor t task s withi n th e Aviatio n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Pla n i n greate rdetail . Shoul d yo u hav e questions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e atflBHHHHfro rvi a emai l a t Sincerely , Carlo s Lo f Manage r- Emergenc yRespons e SkyWes t Airlines , Inc .

44 4 Sout hRive r Roa d Si . George , Utah8479 0 435.634300 0 wivw . skvwest . co m
<PAGE>

                         RESIGNATION OF ARNOLD K. LEAS

         To the Board of Trustees of Stonehaven Realty Trust:

         The undersigned hereby irrevocably resigns as a trustee of Stonehaven
         Realty Trust effective June 30, 2000.

                                             /s/ Arnold K. Leas
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Arnold K. Leas