alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 12/31/98
BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1633
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                       5224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11487
<PP&E>                                            5699
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                        2692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15420
<SALES>                                          12418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12418
<CGS>                                            14046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24625)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.37)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Peter
Frugone, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources Development,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date: June
18, 2010.




/s/ Peter
Frugone





Chief
Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6147
RAYFORD L. BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. J. HOLDEN; CHARLES STEVENS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-2-5-BO) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Holden , No. CA-96-2-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996). Appellant's m otion for office supplies and legal assistance is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1808.613 Negative covenants of Eligible CDFI. The Eligible CDFI will covenant in Bond Loan documents that it will comply with certain negative covenants, as required by the CDFI Fund including, but not limited to, that it will: ( a ) Not incur or issue additional long-term or short-term debt to the extent that the incurrence of such additional debt would violate the specific financial covenants of such Eligible CDFI under the Bond Loan; and
( b ) Not permit liens on all or any part of the Bond Loan collateral, except as permitted pursuant to the Bond Loan documents, and only then to the extent consistent with the applicable laws and regulations governing the Bond Loan and as approved by the CDFI Fund.
# Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in Industry

This series provides data on the number of scientists, engineers and technicians employed in the U.S. economy.

          - Products
          - Sources

#### Most recent data year

            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in the US: 2001(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 05-313 | August 17, 2005 	 
            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in the US: 2000(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 05-311 | June 10, 2005 	 
            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in the US: 1999(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 05-312 | June 9, 2005 	 
            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in the US: 1998(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 02-313 | April 11, 2002 	 
            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in Trade and Regulated Industries: 1994(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 98-305 | June 5, 1998 	 
            - Services Sector S&E Employment Rises, Then Falls Sharply As Engineering and Technician Jobs Are Cut(A)		InfoBriefs |			NSF 97-322 | September 1, 1997 	 
            - Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians in Nonmanufacturing Industries: 1993(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 96-332 | August 29, 1997 	 
            - Nonmanufacturing S&E Employment Continues to Increase, But at Slower Rate(A)		InfoBriefs |			NSF 95-343 | November 30, 1995 	 

(A):  Archived Publication

### Can't Find What You Are Looking For?

        -  Search NCSES  to find data and reports or browse  the Publication Index .						
        - See  permissions  for reuse of NCSES material.

Last Updated: July 17, 2023
# L_2019308EN.01013401.xml

| 29.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/134 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/134

---

Corrigendum to EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 42/19/COL of 17 June 2019 to exempt the operation of public bus transport services in Norway from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2019/...]

(Official Journal of the European Union L 259 of 10 October 2019)

On the cover and on page 75:

for:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 42/19/COL of 17 June 2019 to exempt the operation of public bus transport services in Norway from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2019/...]’,

read:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 42/19/COL of 17 June 2019 to exempt the operation of public bus transport services in Norway from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2019/1699]’.

---
# C_2010298EN.01000801.xml

| 4.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/8

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 298/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 7 July 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 67488 |
| Decision number | : | 292/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Amendment to the Norwegian Special Tax System for Shipping |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Promotion of the maritime sector |
| Form of aid | : | Tax exemptions |
| Budget | : | 0 |
| Duration | : | Income year 2010 |
| Economic sector | : | Maritime sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| PO Box 8008 Dep. |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

7 July 2010

Case number

:

67488

Decision number

:

292/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Amendment to the Norwegian Special Tax System for Shipping

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c)

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Promotion of the maritime sector

Form of aid

:

Tax exemptions

Budget

:

0

Duration

:

Income year 2010

Economic sector

:

Maritime sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

PO Box 8008 Dep.

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 192.225 Approval of plan of conversion by members. ( a ) *In general.* After the appropriate Federal banking agency approves a plan of conversion, the savings association must submit the plan of conversion to its members for approval. The savings association must obtain this approval at a meeting of its members, which may be a special or annual meeting, unless the savings association is State-chartered and State law requires approval via an annual meeting.
( b ) *Approval.* The savings association's members must approve the plan of conversion by a majority of the total outstanding votes, unless the savings association is State-chartered and State law prescribes a higher percentage.
( c ) *Voting method.* Savings association members may vote in person or by proxy.
( d ) *Notification to non-voting members.* The savings association may notify eligible account holders or supplemental eligible account holders who are not voting members of its proposed conversion. The savings association may include only the information in § 192.135 in its notice.
§ 1301.2 Information made available. ( a ) *General.* The FOIA provides for access to records developed or maintained by a Federal agency. The provisions of the FOIA are intended to assure the right of the public to information. Generally, this section divides agency records into three major categories and provides methods by which each category of records is to be made available to the public. The three major categories of records are as follows: ( 1 ) Information required to be published in the Federal Register (see § 1301.3);
( 2 ) Information required to be made available for public inspection in an electronic format or, in the alternative, to be published and offered for sale (see § 1301.4); and
( 3 ) Information required to be made available to any member of the public upon specific request (see §§ 1301.5 through 1301.12).
( b ) *Right of access.* Subject to the exemptions and exclusions set forth in the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b) and (c)), and the regulations set forth in this subpart, any person shall be afforded access to records.
( c ) *Exemptions.* ( 1 ) The disclosure requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) do not apply to certain records which are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552(b); nor do the disclosure requirements apply to certain records which are excluded under 5 U.S.C. 552(c).
( 2 ) The Council shall withhold records or information under the FOIA only when it reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption or when disclosure is prohibited by law. Whenever the Council determines that full disclosure of a requested record is not possible, the Council shall consider whether partial disclosure is possible and shall take reasonable steps to segregate and release nonexempt information. Nothing in this paragraph requires disclosure of information that is otherwise exempted from disclosure under 12 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
# C_2023010EN.01000301.xml

| 12.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 January 2023

(2023/C 10/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0747 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4375 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88673 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2783 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9967 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 154,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 399,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6819 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9335 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,1793 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5588 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4429 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3974 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6912 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4316 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,2827 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2807 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 612,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6975 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,013 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,895 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5840 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4957 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,8120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0747

JPY

Japanese yen

142,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4375

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88673

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2783

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9967

ISK

Iceland króna

154,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

399,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6819

RON

Romanian leu

4,9335

TRY

Turkish lira

20,1793

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5588

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4429

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3974

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6912

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4316

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,01

ZAR

South African rand

18,2827

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2807

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 612,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6975

PHP

Philippine peso

59,013

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

35,895

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5840

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4957

INR

Indian rupee

87,8120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1004.3 Preemption of State law.

Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 3803, a State-chartered or -licensed housing creditor may make, purchase, and enforce alternative mortgage transactions in accordance with § 1004.4(a) through (c) of this part (as applicable), notwithstanding any provision of State law that restricts the ability of the housing creditor to adjust or renegotiate an interest rate or finance charge with respect to the transaction or to change the amount of interest or finance charges included in a regular periodic payment as a result of such an adjustment or renegotiation.
<PAGE>   1
                     SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
               HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND WILLIAM DUNAVANT


         WHEREAS, on or about January 15, 1999, the parties entered into an oral
agreement (the "Oral Agreement") for the exchange of common stock of High Speed
Net Solutions, Inc. for common stock of Summus Technologies, Inc.; and

         WHEREAS, the parties have just now memorialized the Oral Agreement in
writing by a written agreement (the "Written Agreement") dated and effective
August 13, 1999 by and between the parties.

         NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

1.       The actual effective date for the Written Agreement shall be January
         15, 1999.

                                    HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.



/s/ William R. Dunavant             By: /s/ Michael M. Cimino
-----------------------------          -----------------------------------------
William R. Dunavant                    Michael Cimino, Chairman of the Board
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - October 2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 10/1/12 10/8/12 10/15/12 10/22/12 10/31/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units** **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 0.444 0.312 0.239 2.09 2.53

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD = limit of detection = 0.0250 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 10/15/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 10/15/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 090000648119df7c:Sheet1 1/3/2013 2:19 PM
§ 3.45 Recognition of credit risk mitigants for securitization exposures. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) An originating national bank or Federal savings association that has obtained a credit risk mitigant to hedge its exposure to a synthetic or traditional securitization that satisfies the operational criteria provided in § 3.41 may recognize the credit risk mitigant under § 3.36 or § 3.37, but only as provided in this section.
( 2 ) An investing national bank or Federal savings association that has obtained a credit risk mitigant to hedge a securitization exposure may recognize the credit risk mitigant under § 3.36 or § 3.37, but only as provided in this section.
( b ) *Mismatches.* A national bank or Federal savings association must make any applicable adjustment to the protection amount of an eligible guarantee or credit derivative as required in § 3.36(d), (e), and (f) for any hedged securitization exposure. In the context of a synthetic securitization, when an eligible guarantee or eligible credit derivative covers multiple hedged exposures that have different residual maturities, the national bank or Federal savings association must use the longest residual maturity of any of the hedged exposures as the residual maturity of all hedged exposures.
# C_2022385EN.01002201.xml

| 6.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/22

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 July 2022

Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1)

(2022/C 385/04)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.7.2022 – | 3,90 | -0,57 | 1,17 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.7.2022 –

3,90

-0,57

1,17

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

---