alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gelu Voicu, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of
Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 13, 2004

By: /s/ Gelu Voicu
    ---------------
    Gelu Voicu
    President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3027 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3027

To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations used to serve 
              language minorities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

  Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations used to serve 
              language minorities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Minority Media 
Opportunities Act''.

SEC. 2. BROADCAST OWNERSHIP.

    (a) Review of License Transfer.--Section 211(b) of the 
Telecommunications Authorization Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-538; 106 
Stat. 3545) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Subsection 
(a) also applies to any person holding a broadcast license used 
primarily to serve a language minority. The hearing required by 
subsection (a) shall include record evidence, analysis, and Commission 
findings regarding the effects of the application on competition and 
diversity in the programming and distribution markets for the specific 
language minority at issue. For purposes of this subsection, the term 
`language minority' means persons who are American Indian, Asian 
American, Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish heritage.''.
    (b) Broadcast Stations Serving Language Minorities.--Section 202 of 
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104; 110 Stat. 111) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Report to Congress.--Not later than January 1, 2004, the 
Commission shall, after notice and comment, report to Congress 
regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations (including 
AM, FM, and television broadcast stations) used to serve language 
minorities. The Commission shall consider the effects, with respect to 
both competition and diversity concerns, of multiple ownership and 
undue concentration in the programming and distribution markets 
specific to a language minority. For purposes of this subsection, the 
term `language minority' means persons who are American Indian, Asian 
American, Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish heritage.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

## Sunshine Act Meetings

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Tuesday, October 27, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-24560 Filed 10-7-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM HELMSTAR
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES'  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             720,373   
<SECURITIES>                                    70,430,232  
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0 
<PP&E>                                             348,693  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     248,822  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,984,978  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0 
<BONDS>                                         72,750,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           674,960   
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,631,954  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,984,978  
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,247,594 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      459,216            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,185,333  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (396,955) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45,945   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (442,900) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0          
<NET-INCOME>                                     (442,900) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.08) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.08) 
                                                    
 
</TABLE>
#### Dennis v. Mitchell

*Samuel J. Feigus,*for plaintiff.

*Jesse E. Hutson,*for defendant.

January 5, 1957.

Morrow, J.,

Suit in assumpsit against defendant before an alderman was brought by “National Highway Motor Sales, Clarence Dennis, Manager, Markleysburg, Pa.” The alderman gave judgment in favor of plaintiff. An appeal was taken by defendant.

In the complaint filed in this court, plaintiff is designated and named: “Catherine E. Dennis, trading as National Highway Motor Sales, Markleysburg, Pennsylvania.” Preliminary objections were filed by defendant. The only one we deem it necesary to consider here at this time is the alleged failure to file the certificate required by the Fictitious Names Act of May 24, 1945, P. L. 967, 54 PS §28.1 to §28.8. Plaintiff filed an answer alleging and citing the record in the prothonotary’s office in Fictitious Names Docket 9, page 101, and incorporating in the answer said record by this reference thereto.

*636This record shows that on July 12, 1946, one C. E. Dennis, and a man by the name of Savage and a man named Barnes, were registered under the name “National Highway Motor Sales Company” and there was no agent conducting or carrying on the business.

It will be observed that the suit before the aider-man does not mention Catherine Dennis and does mention Clarence Dennis. It appears in the record that Savage and Barnes withdrew in 1948. Neither suit uses the word “Company” which appears in the registration cited. The law cited provides that the certificate filed must set forth the “real” name of any person interested in the business under the name chosen. The letter “C” could apply to “Clarence” as well as to “Catherine,” and such initial is not the real name of either one. So far as appears the alleged oral agreement of" defendant may have been with “Clarence”, whose name appears in the suit before the alderman, whereas the name “Catherine” appears in the complaint filed in this court. The registration, in our opinion, is defective in not citing either the real name “Clarence” or the real name, “Catherine”, leaving the matter open so that the public might consider the husband “Clarence,” who apparently was carrying on the business, to be the owner thereof.

Under the authority of Iannuzzo v. Thomas, 68 D. & C. 406, we sustain the preliminary objection mentioned and enter judgment against plaintiff, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to institute another action after properly complying with the provisions of the aforesaid Fictitious Names Act.

*Order*

And now, January 5, 1957, after consideration, the preliminary objection mentioned in the opinion filed is sustained, and judgment is entered against plaintiff without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to institute another action after proper compliance with the Fictitious Names Act of May 24,1945, P. L. 967.
Exhibit 32




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  March 31, 2005  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Chief   Executive   Officer  and   Principal
Accounting Officer  of  the  Company, certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer , Chief Executive Officer
					and Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: May 15, 2005
§ 308.122 Notice of intent to terminate. ( a ) If, after serving the notification under § 308.121, the Board of Directors determines that any unsafe or unsound practices, condition, or violation, specified in the notification, requires the termination of the insured status of the insured depository institution, the Board of Directors or its designee, if it determines to proceed further, shall cause to be served upon the insured depository institution a notice of its intention to terminate insured status not less than 30 days after service of the notification, unless a shorter time period has been agreed upon by the appropriate Federal banking agency.
( b ) The Board of Directors or its designee shall cause a copy of the notice to be sent to the appropriate Federal banking agency and to the appropriate state banking supervisor, if any.
§ 308.171 Responses to application. ( a ) *By FDIC.* ( 1 ) Within 20 days after service of an application, counsel for the FDIC may file with the Administrative Officer and serve on all parties an answer to the application. Unless counsel for the FDIC requests and is granted an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under § 308.179, failure to file an answer within the 20-day period will be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( 2 ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the FDIC's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the answer shall include either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 308.180.
( b ) *Reply to answer.* The applicant may file a reply with regard to an application filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504 (a)(1), if the FDIC has addressed in its answer any of the following issues: that the position of the FDIC was substantially justified, that the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or that special circumstances make an award unjust. The applicant may file a reply with regard to an application filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504 (a)(4), if the FDIC has addressed in its answer any of the following issues: that the applicant has committed a willful violation of law or otherwise acted in bad faith, that the FDIC's demand is reasonable when compared to the decision of the administrative law judge or that special circumstances make an award unjust. The reply shall be filed within 15 days after service of the answer. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the reply shall include either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 308.180.
( c ) *By other parties.* Any party to the adversary adjudication, other than the applicant and the FDIC, may file comments on an application within 20 days after service of the application. If the applicant is entitled to file a reply to the FDIC's answer under paragraph (b) of this section, another party may file comments on the answer within 15 days after service of the answer. A commenting party may not participate in any further proceedings on the application unless the administrative law judge determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit additional exploration of matters raised in the comments.
( d ) *Additional response.* Additional filings in the nature of pleadings may be submitted only by leave of the administrative law judge.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62102, Nov. 16, 1999; 86 FR 2250, Jan. 12, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000794154
<NAME>                        SEPRAGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                   83,254
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           489,577
<ALLOWANCES>                            (40,000)
<INVENTORY>                             314,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        865,808
<PP&E>                                  785,531
<DEPRECIATION>                         (689,029)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          962,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   504,092
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                             500,000
<COMMON>                             16,852,499
<OTHER-SE>                          (16,894,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            962,310
<SALES>                               1,034,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,034,209
<CGS>                                   598,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           598,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,602,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (13,375)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,180,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,180,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,180,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
§ 308.37 Post-hearing filings. ( a ) *Proposed findings and conclusions and supporting briefs.* ( 1 ) Using the same method of service for each party, the ALJ will serve notice upon each party that the certified transcript, together with all hearing exhibits and exhibits introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing, has been filed. Any party may file with the ALJ proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law, and a proposed order within 30 days following service of this notice by the ALJ or within such longer period as may be ordered by the ALJ.
( 2 ) Proposed findings and conclusions must be supported by citation to any relevant authorities and by page references to any relevant portions of the record. A post-hearing brief may be filed in support of proposed findings and conclusions, either as part of the same document or in a separate document. Any party who fails to file timely with the ALJ any proposed finding or conclusion is deemed to have waived the right to raise in any subsequent filing or submission any issue not addressed in such party's proposed finding or conclusion.
( b ) *Reply briefs.* Reply briefs may be filed within 15 days after the date on which the parties' proposed findings, conclusions, and order are due. Reply briefs must be strictly limited to responding to new matters, issues, or arguments raised in another party's papers. A party who has not filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law or a post-hearing brief may not file a reply brief.
( c ) *Simultaneous filing required.* The ALJ will not order the filing by any party of any brief or reply brief in advance of the other party's filing of its brief.