alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 308.125 Temporary suspension of deposit insurance. ( a ) If, while an action is pending under section 8(a)(2) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(2)), the Board of Directors, after consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency, finds that an insured depository institution (other than a special supervisory association to which § 308.126 of this subpart applies) has no tangible capital under the capital guidelines or regulations of the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Board of Directors may issue a Temporary Order Suspending Deposit Insurance, pending completion of the proceedings under section 8(a)(2) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(a)(2)).
( b ) The temporary order shall be served upon the insured institution and a copy sent to the appropriate Federal banking agency and to the appropriate State banking supervisor.
( c ) The temporary order shall become effective ten days from the date of service upon the insured depository institution. Unless set aside, limited, or suspended in proceedings under section 8(a)(8)(D) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818 (a)(8)(D)), the temporary order shall remain effective and enforceable until an order terminating the insured status of the institution is entered by the Board of Directors and becomes final, or the Board of Directors dismisses the proceedings.
( d ) *Notification to depositors of suspension of insured status.* Within the time specified by the Board of Directors and prior to the suspension of insured status, the depository institution shall mail a notification of suspension of insured status to each depositor at the depositor's last address of record on the books of the depository institution. The depository institution shall also publish the notification in two issues of a local newspaper of general circulation and shall furnish the FDIC with proof of such publications. The notification to depositors shall include information provided in substantially the following form: Notice (Date)____________. 1. The status of the __________, as an (insured depository institution) (insured branch) under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, will be suspended as of the close of business on the ________ day of ____________, 19____, pending the completion of administrative proceedings under section 8(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. 2. Any deposits made by you after that date, either new deposits or additions to existing deposits, will not be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 3. Insured deposits in the (depository institution) (branch) on the ________ day of ____________, 19____, will continue to be insured for ____________ after the close of business on the__________ day of __________, 19____. Provided, however, that any withdrawals after the close of business on the ________ day of____________, 19____, will reduce the insurance coverage by the amount of such withdrawals. (Name of depository institution or branch) (Address)
The notification may include any additional information the depository institution deems advisable, provided that the information required by this section shall be set forth in a conspicuous manner on the first page of the notification.
SUPREME COURT, ONEIDA SPECIAL TERM,

JULY, 1900.

#### Matter of the Application of Florence H. Wright for a Writ of Mandamus against George W. Jones, Treasurer of the City of Utica.

Application for a writ of mandamus.

John G. Gibson, for application.

George C. Morehouse, opposed.

Hiscock, J.

Application granted upon the ground that the petitioner is not an employee either of the State of New York or of the city of Utica within the provisons of the Civil Service Law, the claim that she is being the only defense urged to this application.

Application granted.
# C_2004319EN.01007101.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/71

---

Action brought on 31 August 2004 by Prosessindustriens Landsforening, Borregaard, Elkem ASA, Norsk Hydro ASA, Eramet Norway AS, Norske Skogindustrier ASA, Södra Cell Folla AS, Tinfos Titan & Iron KS, and Yara International ASA against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-6/04)

(2004/C 319/13)

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 31 August 2004 by Prosessindustriens Landsforening, Borregaard, Elkem ASA, Norsk Hydro ASA, Eramet Norway AS, Norske Skogindustrier ASA, Södra Cell Folla AS, Tinfos Titan & Iron KS, and Yara International ASA, represented by Onno W. Brouwer, advocaat, and Michael Schuette, Rechtsanwalt, Freshfields Bruckhaus Derringer, Bastion Tower, Place du Champ de Mars 5, 1050 Brussels.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and

| 2. | Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 148/04/COL of 30 June 2004 (the ‘Decision’) concerns electricity tax and considers the failure to apply that tax to the manufacturing industry to constitute State aid. |
| --- | --- |

—

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 148/04/COL of 30 June 2004 (the ‘Decision’) concerns electricity tax and considers the failure to apply that tax to the manufacturing industry to constitute State aid.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61(1) EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61(1) EEA.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61 EEA and Part II of Protocol 3 on State aid regarding the qualification of existing aid as new aid. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61 EEA and Part II of Protocol 3 on State aid regarding the qualification of existing aid as new aid.

| — | The Decision infringes the principle of legal certainty. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Decision infringes the principle of legal certainty.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority failed to follow proper procedure, violating Articles 17, 18 and 19 of Part II of Protocol 3 to the ESA/Court Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority failed to follow proper procedure, violating Articles 17, 18 and 19 of Part II of Protocol 3 to the ESA/Court Agreement.

| — | The Decision violates Articles 61 and 62 EEA as regards recovery of aid. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Decision violates Articles 61 and 62 EEA as regards recovery of aid.

---
#### § 269b.720 Computation of time for filing papers.

In computing any period of time prescribed by or allowed by the panel, the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period of time begins to run, shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or the applicable local legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed, or allowed, is seven days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded from the computations. When the rules and regulations in this subchapter require the filing of any paper, such document must be received by the panel or the officer or agent designated by it to receive such matter before the close of business of the last day of the time limit, if any, for such filing or extension of the time that may have been granted.
#### BRUNSON V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 14, 1913.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Armstead Brown.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Affirmed on authority of *Isaiah v. The*State, 58 South. 53; *Posey v. The*State, 59 South. 234.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10621

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Pavel Alberto Mejia, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-196-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent DefendantAppellant Pavel Alberto Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed 

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and 

United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia has not filed a 

response. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 13, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10621 Document: 00516609928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2023
No. 22-10621

2

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is therefore GRANTED and counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein. This appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10621 Document: 00516609928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2023
UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
June 30, 1998

EXHIBIT 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549


We are aware that our report dated July 22, 1998, on our review of interim
financial information of UNUM Corporation for the three month and six month
periods ended June 30, 1998, and 1997, and included in the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarters then ended is incorporated by reference in
the following Registration Statements:

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-31270 pertaining to the UNUM Employees 401(k) Plan
      (formerly the UNUM Employees Retirement Savings Plan and Trust)

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-19090 pertaining to the 1987 Executive Stock Option Plan

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-38225 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-52741 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock Incentive
      Plan (additional shares)

  o  Form S-3 No. 33-36873 pertaining to the 1990 Debt Securities

  o  Form S-3 No. 33-69132 pertaining to the 1993 Debt Securities, Preferred
      Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

  o  Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on
      Form S-4 No. 33-55870 pertaining to the issuance of UNUM Corporation
      shares upon the exercise of stock options granted under the Colonial
      plans as defined therein

  o  Form S-3 No. 333-08187 pertaining to the 1996 Debt Securities, Preferred
      Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

  o  Form S-8 No. 333-41917 pertaining to the 1998 Goals Stock Option Plan

  o  Form S-8 No. 333-41897 pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Stock Incentive
      Plan

Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should
not be considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by
accountants within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS   LLP

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

UNUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<CAPTION>
                                        Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,          Septmber 30,
                                        ------------------     -----------------
(Unaudited - Dollars in millions)        1998         1997      1998        1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>      <C>         <C>
Earnings:
 Income before income taxes            $150.1        $131.4   $425.9      $429.5
 Add:  Fixed charges                     15.2          13.2     44.2        39.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings as adjusted                   $165.3        $144.6   $470.1      $468.7
================================================================================
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                    $ 12.6        $ 10.4   $ 36.6      $ 31.2
   Interest portion of rent expense       2.6           2.8      7.6         8.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                    $ 15.2        $ 13.2   $ 44.2      $ 39.2
================================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       10.9          11.0     10.6        12.0
================================================================================
</TABLE>

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
as adjusted consist of income before income taxes and fixed charges.  Fixed
charges consist of interest expense and the estimated interest portion of
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24499]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-026]

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: October 13, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-753, 754, and 756 (Second Review) (Cut-to-
Length Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine)--briefing 
and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before October 26, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 5, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-24499 Filed 10-7-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
DERICK SNEAD

, Appellant,

v.

DEBORAH ANSLEY

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2846

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark H. Mahon , Judge

. Derick Snead, pro se

, Appellant.

Deborah Ansley, pro se

, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in granting appellee’s pet ition for protection against

repeat violence because appellant was not given a full opportunity to present

evidence in opposition to the petition. Accordingly, we reverse the injunction and

remand for a new hearing on the petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY and SWANSON, J J

. , CONCUR ; MARSTILLER, J., DISSENTS WITHOUT OPINION.
----

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |            |                                        |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                     |            |                                        |
| Date: August                8, 2006 | By:   | /s/ M.                Christine Jacobs |
|                                     |            | M.                Christine Jacobs          |
|                                     |            | Chief                Executive Officer      |
# C_2018205EN.01000601.xml

| 14.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/6

---

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Termination and appointment of Hearing Officers

(2018/C 205/04)

As of 1 April 2018, the EFTA Surveillance Authority appointed Mr Craig Simpson, official of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, as a Hearing Officer for the purposes of EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 442/12/COL of 29 November 2012 on the function and terms of reference of the Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (1).

1

Ms Charlotte Fornø terminated her functions as Hearing Officer, as set out in EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 442/12/COL, as of 31 March 2018. Mr Casper Ebrecht remains in post as Hearing Officer at the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

---

(1)  OJ L 190, 11.7.2013, p. 93, and EEA Supplement No 40, 11.7.2013, p. 3.

1

---
# C_2021466EN.01000201.xml

| 18.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 November 2021

(2021/C 466/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1316 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84090 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0303 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0530 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8895 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,220 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 364,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6571 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,8601 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5521 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4206 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8140 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6162 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5364 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5176 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2170 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5116 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 117,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7290 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,944 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,0791 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,969 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2028 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4259 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,0300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1316

JPY

Japanese yen

129,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84090

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0303

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0530

ISK

Iceland króna

149,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8895

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,220

HUF

Hungarian forint

364,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6571

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

11,8601

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5521

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4206

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8140

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6162

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5364

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,42

ZAR

South African rand

17,5176

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2170

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5116

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 117,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7290

PHP

Philippine peso

56,944

RUB

Russian rouble

82,0791

THB

Thai baht

36,969

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2028

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4259

INR

Indian rupee

84,0300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule contains summary information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the three month period ended May
31, 1998.  Information contained in this Financial Data Schedule is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                          68,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    183,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326,904
<PP&E>                                         503,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 955,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,642,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,514
<OTHER-SE>                                   (699,636)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   955,974
<SALES>                                      1,262,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,262,318
<CGS>                                          273,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,287,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (299,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (299,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (299,041)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1250.2 Procedural requirements. ( a ) *Procedures.* An Enterprise shall implement procedures reasonably designed to ensure for any loan that is secured by improved real estate or a mobile home located in an area that has been identified, at the time of the origination of the loan or at any time during the term of the loan, by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as an area having special flood hazards and in which flood insurance is available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 *et seq.*), as amended and purchased by the Enterprise, the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the loan is covered for the term of the loan by flood insurance in an amount at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the loan or the maximum limit of coverage made available with respect to the particular type of property under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended.
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall apply only with respect to any loan made, increased, extended, or renewed after September 22, 1995.
( 2 ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to any loan having an original outstanding balance of $5,000 or less and a repayment term of one year or less.