alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10Q FOR
THE SECOND QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 FOR NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANY AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000795000
<NAME> NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,064)
<INVENTORY>                                     27,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,259
<PP&E>                                          47,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,750
<BONDS>                                          6,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,870
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,015
<SALES>                                        152,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,702
<CGS>                                          101,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,842
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015068EN.01000401.xml

| 26.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 7 July 2014

in Case E-5/13

Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority

v

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Access to documents — Admissibility — Measures of organisation of procedure — EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Rules on access to documents 2012)

(2015/C 68/04)

In Case E-5/13, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for annulment of EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) Decisions of 25 January 2013 and 18 February 2013 in ESA Case No 73075 to deny access to documents, belonging to the case files that led to ESA Decision No 321/10/COL (Norway Post — loyalty/discount system), under the new rules on access to documents enacted by ESA on 5 September 2012 in ESA Decision No 300/12/COL (‘RAD 2012’) (not published in the Official Journal), the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 7 July 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:

v

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Annuls ESA’s decision of 25 January 2013 in ESA Case No 73075 (DB Schenker) in so far as it refuses full or partial access under Article 4(4) and (6) RAD 2012 to documents belonging to the case files that led to ESA Decision No 321/10/COL (Norway Post — loyalty/discount system) and refuses to grant access to the complete version of ESA Decision No 321/10/COL. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls ESA’s decision of 25 January 2013 in ESA Case No 73075 (DB Schenker) in so far as it refuses full or partial access under Article 4(4) and (6) RAD 2012 to documents belonging to the case files that led to ESA Decision No 321/10/COL (Norway Post — loyalty/discount system) and refuses to grant access to the complete version of ESA Decision No 321/10/COL.

| 2. | Dismisses the application as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders each party and the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party and the intervener to bear its own costs.

---
II 

Calendar No. 552 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3029 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, 

as the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3029 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 552 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3029 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ‘‘S. Truett Cathy al Service located at 255 North Main Street in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
#### § 28.21 Service of process.

A foreign bank operating at any Federal branch or agency is subject to service of process at the location of the Federal branch or agency.
----

**TITAN        INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

|                                                 | **Jurisdiction                  of** |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Name**                                             | **Incorporation**                    |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Luxembourg S.a.r.l.           | Luxembourg                           |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Tire Corporation              | Illinois                             |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Tire Corporation of Freeport  | Illinois                             |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Tire Corporation of Natchez   | Mississippi                          |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Tire Corporation of Texas     | Texas                                |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Wheel Corporation of Illinois | Illinois                             |
|                                                 |                                 |
| Titan                  Wheel Corporation of Virginia | Virginia                             |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                                  ORAVAX, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

            WEIGHTED SHARES USED IN COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<S>                                                                     <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1994
        Common stock outstanding, beginning of year ................    206,862
        Cheap stock shares relating to SAB No. 83(1) ...............    364,277
        Weighted average common stock issued during fiscal
          year 1993 ................................................        188
                                                                      ---------
                                                                        571,327

For the year ended December 31, 1995
        Common stock outstanding, beginning of year ................    230,661
        Cheap stock shares relating to SAB No. 83(1) ...............     88,824
        Weighted average common stock issued during the period .....  4,146,470
                                                                      ---------
                                                                      4,465,955

For the year ended December 31, 1996
        Common stock outstanding, beginning of year.................  7,615,865
        Weighted average common stock issued during fiscal
          year 1996 ................................................  1,178,910
                                                                      ---------
                                                                      8,794,775



--------------
<FN>

(1)  In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB No. 83"), issuances
     of Common Stock equivalents (preferred stock, common stock, stock options
     and warrants) one year prior to the initial filing date of the Company's
     registration statement at share prices below the public offering price of
     $10.00 per share ("Cheap Stock"), are considered to have been made in
     anticipation of the public offering and have been included as if the shares
     were outstanding for all periods presented until the effectiveness of the
     initial public offering using the treasury stock method at the public
     offering price of $10.00 per share.

</TABLE>
# C_2023070EN.01000901.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 February 2023

(2023/C 70/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0570 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88245 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0030 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9898 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,643 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 380,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7205 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9195 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,9565 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5668 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4374 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2959 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7109 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4239 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,5243 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3398 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 098,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6883 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,045 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,921 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4633 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5027 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,4845 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0570

JPY

Japanese yen

143,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88245

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0030

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9898

ISK

Iceland króna

152,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,643

HUF

Hungarian forint

380,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7205

RON

Romanian leu

4,9195

TRY

Turkish lira

19,9565

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5668

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4374

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2959

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7109

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4239

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,18

ZAR

South African rand

19,5243

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3398

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 098,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6883

PHP

Philippine peso

58,045

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,921

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4633

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5027

INR

Indian rupee

87,4845

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation®, (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M.
Christine Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ M. Christine
Jacobs M. Christine JacobsChief Executive OfficerNovember 4, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Theragenics Corporation® and
will be retained by Theragenics Corporation® and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 303.247 Continue or resume status as an insured institution following termination under section 8 of the FDI Act. ( a ) *Scope.* This section relates to an application by a depository institution whose insured status has been terminated under section 8 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1818) for permission to continue or resume its status as an insured depository institution. This section covers institutions whose deposit insurance continues in effect for any purpose or for any length of time under the terms of an FDIC order terminating deposit insurance, but does not cover operating non-insured depository institutions which were previously insured by the FDIC, or any non-insured, non-operating depository institution whose charter has not been surrendered or revoked.
( b ) *Where to file.* Applicants shall submit a letter application to the appropriate FDIC office.
( c ) *Content of filing.* The filing shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) A complete statement of the action requested, all relevant facts, and the reason for such requested action; and
( 2 ) A certified copy of the resolution of the depository institution's board of directors authorizing submission of the filing.
( d ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information at any time during processing of the filing.
( e ) *Processing.* The FDIC will provide the applicant with written notification of the final action as soon as the decision is rendered.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002. Redesignated at 71 FR 20526, Apr. 21, 2006]
MSI EX 10.6 (Q1 2015)




Motorola Solutions, Inc.
2015-2017 Long Range Incentive Plan (LRIP) Terms
As Approved by the Compensation and Leadership Committee
On February 11, 2015
	
		
	Design Feature
	2015-2017 LRIP

	Performance Cycle
	Three years from 2015-2017

	Eligible Population
	CVPs and above

	Performance Criteria
	Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
TSR Defined as:
Ending stock price
   (Daily average during the final three months of the Performance Cycle)
+   Value of reinvested dividends
=   Total ending value
–   Beginning stock price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
=   Total value created
÷   Beginning share price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
= Total shareholder return



	Negative TSR Component
	If the resulting TSR performance for Motorola Solutions is negative, the Committee will have negative discretion to reduce the final payout up to a 25% reduction of the calculated payout.

	Comparator Group
	S&P 500 defined as companies in the S&P 500 at the beginning of the performance period; must be publicly traded on or after July 1, 2016 to be included in the TSR percentile calculation at the end of the performance cycle.

	Payout Scale




	                            













23
#### § 263.56 Initial licensing proceedings.

Proceedings with respect to applications for initial licenses will include, but not be limited to, applications for Board approval under section 3 of the BHC Act and section 10 of HOLA and such proceedings as may be ordered by the Board with respect to applications under section 18(c) of the FDIA. In such initial licensing proceedings, the procedures set forth in subpart A of this part will apply, except that the Board may designate a Board Counsel to represent the Board in a nonadversary capacity for the purpose of developing for the record information relevant to the issues to be determined by the Presiding Officer and the Board. In such proceedings, Board Counsel will be considered to be a decisional employee for purposes of §§ 263.9 and 263.40.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          12,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,591
<PP&E>                                         812,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,439,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          828,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       208,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     400,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,439,470
<SALES>                                      2,199,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,222,383
<CGS>                                          793,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,777,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (574,172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (574,172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (574,172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. TAYLOR et al.

No. 31275.

Dec. 21, 1943.

*144 P. 2d 114.*

Walter Marlin and W. E. Rice, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Anglin, Stevenson & Huser, of Holdenville, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding was filed herein December 29, 1942, seeking to reverse a judgment for the defendants in the trial court.

On the 4th day of October, 1943, the *406parties stipulated that the cause could be reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court.

The court has examined the record and the stipulation filed herein and directs that the cause be reversed and remanded to the trial court; “that the interest in that part of the real estate involved in this action adjudged to be owned by defendants in error be held to be subject to the mortgage lien of the plaintiff in error, and to render judgment in conformity with said opinion, ordering that all of said real estate be impressed first with the mortgage lien of the plaintiff in error; that said lands be sold in conformity with the provisions of said judgment in event of failure to redeem, being offered first subject to the interest owned by defendants in error, and failing to bring sufficient to satisfy the amount of judgment, interest, attorney’s fees and costs in favor of plaintiff in error, then be sold free and clear of any right, title or interest of defendants in error or any person or persons claiming any right, title, or interest by, through or under them, or any of them.”

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

CORN, C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., absent.
§ 303.44 Public notice requirements. ( a ) *Newspaper publications.* For applications to establish or relocate a branch, a notice as described in § 303.7(c) shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation. For applications to relocate a main office, notice shall be published at least once each week on the same day for two consecutive weeks. The required publication shall be made in the following communities: ( 1 ) *To establish a branch.* In the community in which the main office is located and in the communities to be served by the branch (including messenger services and mobile branches).
( 2 ) *To relocate a main office.* In the community in which the main office is currently located and in the community to which it is proposed the main office will relocate.
( 3 ) *To relocate a branch.* In the community in which the branch is located.
( b ) *Public comments.* Comments by interested parties must be received by the appropriate regional director within 15 days after the date of the last newspaper publication required by paragraph (a) of this section, unless the comment period has been extended or reopened in accordance with § 303.9(b)(2).
( c ) *Lobby notices.* In the case of applications to relocate a main office or a branch, a copy of the required newspaper publication shall be posted in the public lobby of the office to be relocated for at least 15 days beginning on the date of the last published notice required by paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 265.3 Board review of delegated actions. ( a ) *Request by Board member.* The Board shall review any action taken at a delegated level upon the vote of one member of the Board, either on the member's own initiative or on the basis of a petition for review by any person claiming to be adversely affected by the delegated action.
( b ) *Petition for review.* A petition for review of a delegated action must be received by the Secretary of the Board not later than the fifth day following the date of the delegated action.
( c ) *Notice of review.* The Secretary shall give notice of review by the Board of a delegated action to any person with respect to whom the action was taken not later than the tenth day following the date of the delegated action. Upon receiving notice, such person may not proceed further in reliance upon the delegated action until notified of the outcome of the review by the Board.
( d ) *By action of a delegatee.* A delegatee may submit any matter to the Board for determination if the delegatee considers it appropriate because of the importance or complexity of the matter.