alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006272EN.01003801.xml

| 9.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/38

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 (3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2006/C 272/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections to the notified measure

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 58699

Title: EFTA Surveillance Authority decision of 8 March 2006 on the notification of an amendment of the regional seed capital scheme

Objective: To increase the supply of seed capital and to promote the development of assisted areas

Legal basis: St.prp. nr.1 (2004-2005), Budsjett-innst. S.nr. 6 (2004-2005) and Budsjett-innst. S. nr. 8 (2004-2005)

Duration: Up to 15 years

Budget: Subordinated loans of NOK 700 million (approximately EUR 85 million), a loss-fund of NOK 175 million (approximately EUR 21 million) and administrative costs of NOK 50 million (approximately EUR 6,1 million)

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
# C_2014066EN.01001101.xml

| 6.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/11

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2014/C 66/09

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 18/13/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway |
| Address | 7. juni-plassen/Victoria Terrasse |
| PO Box 8114 Dep. |
| 0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 18/13/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway

Address

7. juni-plassen/Victoria Terrasse

PO Box 8114 Dep.

0032 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.mfa.no

Title of the aid measure

Black carbon inventory and management plan in Russian Arctic (ad hoc grant through the Barents 2020 grant scheme)

National legal basis (reference to the relevant national official publication)

Parliamentary appropriation (Prop. 1 S (2012-2013))

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

Ad hoc grant under Barents 2020. Information about Barents 2020 may be found at pp. 100-101 in Parliamentary appropriation (Prop. 1 S (2012-2013)):

http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/38072348/PDFS/PRP201220130001_UDDDDPDFS.pdf

Type of measure

Ad hoc aid

Carbon Limits AS

Date of granting

Ad hoc aid

13.11.2013

Duration: 1.11.2013 to 1.4.2015, disbursed in annual installments, subject to parliamentary appropriations

Economic sector(s) concerned

Limited to specific sectors — please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2.

Research

NACE 72.19

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Budget

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

2013-2015: total NOK 1 284 500

To be disbursed in installments as follows:

| | 2013: NOK 375 000 (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2013: NOK 375 000 (tentative)

| | 2014: NOK 800 000 (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2014: NOK 800 000 (tentative)

| | 2015: NOK 109 500 (tentative) |
| --- | --- |

2015: NOK 109 500 (tentative)

Aid instrument

(Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects
  (Article 31) | Industrial research
  (Article 31(2)(b)) | 50 % |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects

(Article 31)

Industrial research

(Article 31(2)(b))

50 %

---
#### MODERN BUILDERS, Inc., v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF TULSA et al.

No. 31287.

Oct. 5, 1943.

*141 P. 2d 800.*

Chas. L. Yancey, Kavanaugh Bush, and Charles P. Gotwals, Jr., all of Tulsa, for plainitff in error.

E. M. Gallaher, City Atty., and Eban L. Taylor, both of Tulsa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

On June 16, 1942, the Modern Builders, Incorporated, filed ah application for a building permit. This application was filed before the board created by the ordinance of the city of Tulsa, which ordinance provides for an appeal to the district court. The board denied the application.

On the 6tb day of July, 1942, the district court of Tulsa county heard the same on appeal and likewise denied the *142application. The Modern Builders filed a motion for new trial and attempt to appeal from the order overruling the motion for new trial. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed January 11, 1943, and it is conceded that no appeal was perfected from the order entered July 6, 1942, unless the proceeding filed authorized the filing and determination of a motion for new trial. A motion^ to dismiss has been filed for the reason that no motion for new trial is necessary.

We are of the opinion and hold that the motion for new trial was not necessary and served no purpose to extend the time for the filing of an appeal. The appeal from the ordinance involved was a special proceeding. Reinhart & Donovan v. Refiners’ Production Co., 175 Okla. 522, 53 P. 2d 1116.

In a special proceeding a motion for new trial is not necessary in order to, review the action of the trial court. Burgin v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, 188 Okla. 645, 112 P. 2d 802; Sweeney v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 183 Okla. 211, 80 P. 2d 582.

The filing and determination of the motion for new trial did not extend the time to file the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J„ and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH. DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. HURST, J., absent.
42623.

#### J. D. JEWELL, INC. v. CAMPBELL, Commissioner.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The contentions of the appellant have been decided adversely to it by the decisions of *Campbell v. J. D. Jewell, Inc.,*111 Ga. App. 242 (141 SE2d 326) and *Campbell v. J. D. Jewell, Inc.,*221 Ga. 543, 548 (2) (145 SE2d 569), which are controlling on this appeal. The trial *436court did not err in its judgment granting the appellee’s motion for a summary judgment.

*Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Argued March 6, 1967

Decided March 17, 1967.

*Robinson, Thompson, Buice & Harben, B. Carl Buice,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, George J. Hearn, III, Assistant Attorney General, Gerald H. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Davidson Growth Plus GP Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
§ 271.3 Certification of record; service of subpoenas or other process. ( a ) *Certification of record.* The secretary of the Committee may certify the authenticity of any Committee record, or any copy of such record, for any purpose, and for or before any duly constituted Federal or state court, tribunal, or agency.
( b ) *Service of subpoenas or other process.* Subpoenas or other judicial or administrative process demanding access to any Committee records or making any claim against the Committee or against Committee members or staff in their official capacity shall be addressed to and served upon the Secretary of the Committee, Federal Open Market Committee, 20th Street & Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551. The Committee does not accept service of process on behalf of any employee in respect of purely private legal disputes.
§ 308.148 Rights of witnesses. In an investigation: ( a ) Any person compelled or requested to furnish testimony, documentary evidence, or other information, shall upon request be shown and provided with a copy of the order initiating the proceeding;
( b ) Any person compelled or requested to provide testimony as a witness or to furnish documentary evidence may be represented by a counsel who meets the requirements of § 308.6 of the Uniform Rules. That counsel may be present and may: ( 1 ) Advise the witness before, during, and after such testimony;
( 2 ) Briefly question the witness at the conclusion of such testimony for clarification purposes; and
( 3 ) Make summary notes during such testimony solely for the use and benefit of the witness;
( c ) All persons testifying shall be sequestered. Such persons and their counsel shall not be present during the testimony of any other person, unless permitted in the discretion of the person conducting the investigation. Neither attorney(s) for the institution that is the subject of the investigation, nor attorney(s) for any other interested persons, shall have any right to be present during the testimony of any witness not personally represented by such attorney;
( d ) In cases of a perceived or actual conflict of interest arising out of an attorney's or law firm's representation of multiple witnesses, the person conducting the investigation may require the attorney to comply with the provisions of § 308.8 of the Uniform Rules; and
( e ) Witness fees shall be paid in accordance with § 308.14 of the Uniform Rules.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62100, Nov. 16, 1999; 80 FR 5013, Jan. 30, 2015]
# C_2022145EN.01000301.xml

| 1.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 March 2022

(2022/C 145/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1101 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4379 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84595 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0267 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,375 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 369,77 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6531 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,2823 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4829 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3896 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6918 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6014 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5028 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 347,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1727 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0403 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 947,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6677 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,514 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,911 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3009 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0903 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,1340 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1101

JPY

Japanese yen

135,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4379

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84595

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0267

ISK

Iceland króna

142,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,375

HUF

Hungarian forint

369,77

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6531

RON

Romanian leu

4,9463

TRY

Turkish lira

16,2823

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4829

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3896

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6918

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6014

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5028

KRW

South Korean won

1 347,37

ZAR

South African rand

16,1727

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0403

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 947,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6677

PHP

Philippine peso

57,514

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,911

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3009

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0903

INR

Indian rupee

84,1340

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2008027EN.01003001.xml

| 31.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/30

---

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 7 of the Act referred to at point 18 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services)

(2008/C 27/09)

Diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, which are the object of mutual recognition under the EEA Agreement

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has the task, in accordance with Article 7 of the Act referred to at point 18 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services), to publish diplomas in architecture awarded by Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, which meet the criteria laid down in Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 85/384/EEC.

Updating of this list shall be published periodically by the EFTA Surveillance Authority pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Act.

The list of diplomas shall be amended by the following title of a diploma communicated by Liechtenstein to the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| Country | Evidence of formal qualification | Body awarding the evidence of qualification | Certificate accompanying the evidence of qualification | Reference academic year |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Liechtenstein | Master of Science in Architecture (MScArch) | Hochschule Liechtenstein | — | 2002/2003 |

Country

Evidence of formal qualification

Body awarding the evidence of qualification

Certificate accompanying the evidence of qualification

Reference academic year

Liechtenstein

Master of Science in Architecture (MScArch)

Hochschule Liechtenstein

—

2002/2003

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000007

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,

AS TRUSTEE FOR MORTGAGE ASSETS MANAGEMENT SERIES 1 TRUST,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL ADDISON CRAWFORD,

Defendant-Appellant, and MARY CRAWFORD; SECRETARY

OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; JORDAN HARA; LINDA SAN JOSE;

FRANCE SAN JOSE; DANAMICHAEL DUTRO, Defendants-Appellees,

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 15-1-364)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On January 2, 2020, self-represented DefendantAppellant Paul Addison Crawford (Paul Crawford) conventionally

filed the notice of appeal in the Circuit Court of the Third

Circuit;

(2) On January 6, 2020, the circuit court clerk

electronically filed the notice of appeal here to create this

appeal;

(3) On March 6, 2020, the circuit court clerk filed the

record on appeal, and the appellate clerk notified the parties

that the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on

or before March 16, 2020, and April 15, 2020, respectively;

(4) Paul Crawford failed to file either document or

request an extension of time;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000007

22-JUN-2020

09:59 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) On May 21, 2020, the appellate clerk notified Paul

Crawford that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction

and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the

court's attention on June 1, 2020, for appropriate action, which

could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Paul Crawford could

request relief from default by motion; and

(6) Paul Crawford took no further action in this

appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 22, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Chemicals
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul G. Vanderhoven, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ PAUL G. VANDERHOVEN
-----------------------
Paul G. Vanderhoven
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2002



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 207.10 Transition provisions. ( a ) *Disclosure of covered agreements entered into before the effective date of this part.* The following disclosure requirements apply to covered agreements that were entered into after November 12, 1999, and that terminated before April 1, 2001. ( 1 ) *Disclosure to the public.* Each NGEP and each insured depository institution or affiliate that was a party to the agreement must make the agreement available to the public under § 207.6 until at least April 1, 2002.
( 2 ) *Disclosure to the relevant supervisory agency.* ( i ) Each NGEP that was a party to the agreement must make the agreement available to the relevant supervisory agency under § 207.6 until at least April 1, 2002.
( ii ) Each insured depository institution or affiliate that was a party to the agreement must, by June 30, 2001, provide each relevant supervisory agency either— ( A ) A copy of the agreement under § 207.6(d)(1)(i); or
( B ) The information described in § 207.6(d)(1)(ii) for each agreement.
( b ) *Filing of annual reports that relate to fiscal years ending on or before December 31, 2000.* In the event that a NGEP, insured depository institution or affiliate has any information to report under § 207.7 for a fiscal year that ends on or before December 31, 2000, and that concerns a covered agreement entered into between May 12, 2000, and December 31, 2000, the annual report for that fiscal year must be provided no later than June 30, 2001, to— ( 1 ) Each relevant supervisory agency; or
( 2 ) In the case of a NGEP, to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement in accordance with § 207.7(f)(2).