alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,185
<INVENTORY>                                      9,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,807
<PP&E>                                         158,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          194,878
<BONDS>                                        127,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           575
<OTHER-SE>                                   (180,748)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,571
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,490
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (445,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (449,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (449,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.30)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Davidson Growth Plus, L.P. 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB nd is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000795757
<NAME> DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,550   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,612   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,895     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,777    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,612    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,617    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,343    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 526    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       247     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.46<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Aston v. Kovalcik

*J. Earl Langan,*for plaintiff.

*Bernard J. Podcasy,*for defendant.

January 14, 1957.

Aponick, J.,

This is a quo warranto proceeding brought to determine the validity of the appointment of Philip Kovaleik as councilman of the Borough of Ashley in place of Frank B. Gatuskey. Defendant has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and also asking for a more specific complaint.

The Council of the Borough of Ashley consists of six persons, two being elected from each ward. On October 9,1950, Frank B. Gatuskey, a councilman from the third ward, resigned and his resignation was accepted on October 11,1956. This reduced the number of councilmen to five. Thereafter, at a meeting held October 17,1956, defendant, Philip Kovaleik, was elected to fill the vacancy. There were only three council members present at this meeting and all three voted for defendant.

*446Section 23 of The. Borough Code of July 10, 1947, P. L. 1621, .53 PS §46001, provides as follows: “A majority of the entire membership . . . shall constitute a quorum.”. Plaintiff contends .that this means that a quorum consists, of four members, that being a majority of six. Defendant contends that, as there were only five members and a vacancy at that time, a .quorum consisted of three, which is a majority of five, and that the meeting of October 17 was legal.

This'case is directly -ruledby'two- cases- in this court decided upon facts which are, for all practical purposes, the same.

In Commonwealth ex rel. v. Sullivan, 32 Luz. 339, the council of Duryea Borough consisted of 10 members; two from each ward. One of those persons died and five of the remaining nine elected a person to the vacancy. Judgh Farrell held that the election was invalid'and granted judgment in favor of the Commonwealth.

In Commonwealth ex rel. v. Pritchard, 38 Luz. 73, the council of Luzerne Borough consisted of. eight members. One resigned and four of the remaining seven met a,nd elected a successor. Judge Fine held the election to be illegal because no. quorum was present.

To the same effect see Commonwealth ex. rel. v. Dellaquilla, 58 D. & C. 318.

The above cases cannot be distinguished in principle from the one now before us. and we think they should be followed.

As to .the more specific complaint, we think that the questions raised by the preliminary objections are either matters of defense or raise questions of law which have been disposed of by what has been said in connection with the demurrer. . •

Accordingly, the preliminary objections are overruled and defendant is directed to answer on the merits within 20 days of the date of this order.
810-100311-00 5 %€ f 

### KANSA S ^MN!l/^HA N f?tGK:>^JA l AIHPO« 1 March 1.201 0 Hi e Honorabl e Raymond II . Lalloo d Secretar y U.S . Deparlnicn

t o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jersey Ave . S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-00> 4 ^^^' ^ '<^^ ' ^ ^ Dea r Mr . Secretary : I a mwritin g t

o expres s m

y suppor t To r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y and propose djoin

t busines s agreement

filed b y America n Airline s (AA ) an d Japa

n Airline s (JAL) . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vital fo r th e oneworl d allianc e to compete clTcctively wit h th e Sta r an d SkyTea malliances . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n will i n tur n enhanc e the benefit s o f

th e Department' s Open Skie s polic y - first

b y solidifyin g U.S . - Japa

n Open Skies , the n b

y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r opennes s acros s Asia . 1 strongly encourag e th e Department o f Iransportatio n to approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allitinc e airline s to wor k closel y togethe r

to delive r highly competiiiv c ai r

transportatio n services . Approva l o f th e AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e a positiv e impac t

o n ai r trave l b y offerin g customer s mor

e service , schedulin g and pricin g option s an d will hel p to ensur e tha

t customer s continu e to benefi t fi"omth e competitio n afforde db y thre e competitiv e ai r

alliances . I urg e yo u to quickl y approv e thi s application . Sinccrclv . Peter C . Va n Kure n Airpor t Directo r



### FL Y 

### .CO M Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         548,109
<SECURITIES>                                   1,230,213
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,587,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   329,691
<INVENTORY>                                    6,661,584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,014,171
<PP&E>                                         9,961,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,051,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,375,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,066,755
<BONDS>                                        10,333,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,469
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,951,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,375,246
<SALES>                                        13,050,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,050,099
<CGS>                                          8,381,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,464,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               837,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               61,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             458,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,366,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                   556,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            810,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   810,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .28


</TABLE>
§ 261b.13 Fees. ( a ) Copies of transcripts, recordings or transcriptions of recordings, or minutes requested pursuant to section § 261b.12(b) of this part will be provided at the cost of 10¢ per standard page for photocopying or at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of printing, typing, or otherwise preparing such copies.
( b ) Documents may be furnished without charge where total charges are less than $2.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Carolee A. King v. Donald Joseph Lyons

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 01089

- CV

Trial court case number: 12

- FD

- 2550

Trial court: 306th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant/cross

- appellee Carolee A. King (“King”) and appellee/cross

- appellant Donald Joseph Lyons (“Lyons”) filed an “Agreed, Joint Motion to Adopt Further Briefing Schedule and

For Leave to Assert Cross

- Points in Appellee’s Brief” requ esting that we modify the briefing schedule and allow the parties to file consolidated appeal/cross

- appeal briefs. As noted in the motion, King filed her appellant brief on March 31, 2014. We grant the motion. Accordingly, we ORDER that the briefing schedu le in this case is as follows:

 Lyons’s consolidated appellee/cross

- appellant brief is due on or before June 9,
2014 (16,500 word limit)

.

 King’s consolidated appellant reply/cross

- appellee brief is due on or before July 9, 2014 (14,000 word limit).

 Lyons’s cross

- appellant reply brief is due on or before July 29, 2014 (7,000 word limit).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 12, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3050 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3050

 To provide a 10 percent increase in the rate of basic pay for members 
                       of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a 10 percent increase in the rate of basic pay for members 
                       of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN BASIC PAY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004.

    (a) Waiver of Section 1009 Adjustment.--The adjustment to become 
effective during fiscal year 2004 required by section 1009 of title 37, 
United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized 
members of the uniformed services shall not be made.
    (b) Increase in Basic Pay.--Effective on January 1, 2004, the rates 
of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are 
increased by 10 percent.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anita Britt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Perry Ellis International,
Inc.



|              |  |                        
|------------- |  | -----------------------
|April 9, 2009
|              | 
|By:           |  | /s/ Anita Britt        
|Name:         |  | Anita Britt            
|Title:        |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                       63,185
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                8,955
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  990,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             1,492,722
<PP&E>                       574,674
<DEPRECIATION>               218,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               2,012,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        231,981
<BONDS>                      8,498,420
<COMMON>                     344,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        440,329
<PREFERRED>                  0
<OTHER-SE>                   (7,270,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 2,012,785
<SALES>                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             3,174
<CGS>                        119,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                775,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           343,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (892,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (892,210)
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 (892,210)
<EPS-BASIC>                (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (0.04)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                        13,218,601
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 45,718
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,264,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         513,128
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    12,751,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,264,319
<SALES>                       1,681,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,779,329
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              92,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,793,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               31,856,503
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  63,615,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 8.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                 8.68
        

</TABLE>
#### § 161.16 Demand accounts.

The term *demand accounts* means non-interest-bearing demand deposits that are subject to check or to withdrawal or transfer on negotiable or transferable order to the savings association and that are permitted to be issued by statute, regulation, or otherwise and are payable on demand.
# C_2021075EN.01000501.xml

| 4.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 17 November 2020

in Case E-9/19

Abelia and WTW AS

v

EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority – State aid – eHealth – Admissibility – Status as interested party – Doubts or serious difficulties – Notion of an undertaking)

(2021/C 75/05)

In Case E-9/19, Abelia and WTW AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority – APPLICATION for the annulment of EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 57/19/COL of 10 July 2019 to close the case without opening the formal investigation procedure as to whether the public financing of eHealth and digital health infrastructure in the Norwegian healthcare system, as well as the provision of certain support services and registers, constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 17 November 2020, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as unfounded.

| 2. | Orders the applicants to pay the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to pay the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

---
# C_2022269EN.01002901.xml

| 13.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/29

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 July 2022

(2022/C 269/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0042 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4408 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84823 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6290 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9883 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2754 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,582 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 409,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8190 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9413 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,4392 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4900 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3094 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,8828 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6395 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4127 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 315,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1509 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7518 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5170 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 054,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4556 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,648 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,392 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4009 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8883 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8965 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0042

JPY

Japanese yen

137,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4408

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84823

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6290

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9883

ISK

Iceland króna

139,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2754

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,582

HUF

Hungarian forint

409,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8190

RON

Romanian leu

4,9413

TRY

Turkish lira

17,4392

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4900

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3094

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,8828

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6395

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4127

KRW

South Korean won

1 315,10

ZAR

South African rand

17,1509

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7518

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5170

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 054,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4556

PHP

Philippine peso

56,648

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,392

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4009

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8883

INR

Indian rupee

79,8965

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW  ALL  MEN BY  THESE  PRESENTS  that  I,  Kirby  L.  Cramer,  in my
individual  capacity  and  as  Director  of  Unilab   Corporation,   a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban,  severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date  hereof  until such time as this Power of  Attorney  is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge,  record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration  statements for the filing of
securities  of the Company  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  as amended (the
"Securities Act") and any and all subsequent filings made by or on behalf of the
Company with the United States  Securities and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to
the Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of October 1994.

                                                  /s/ Kirby L. Cramer
                                                  Kirby L. Cramer