alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3051

To pay a one-time bonus to members of the Armed Forces who served 

or serve in a combat zone designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom 

or Operation Enduring Freedom, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To pay a one-time bonus to members of the Armed Forces 

who served or serve in a combat zone designated for 

Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3051 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ONE-TIME BONUS FOR SERVICE IN COMBAT 

2 ZONE DESIGNATED FOR OPERATION IRAQI 

3 FREEDOM OR OPERATION ENDURING FREE4 DOM. 

5 (a) MILITARY SERVICES.—The Secretary of Defense 

6 shall pay a one-time bonus of $1,500 to each member of 

7 the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, including 

8 reserve components thereof, who served or serves for any 

9 period of time in a combat zone designated in connection 

10 with Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring 

11 Freedom. 

12 (b) COAST GUARD.—The Secretary of Homeland Se13 curity shall pay a one-time bonus of $1,500 to each mem14 ber of the Coast Guard or Coast Guard Reserve who 

15 served or serves for any period of time in a combat zone 

16 designated in connection with Operation Iraqi Freedom or 

17 Operation Enduring Freedom.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.19

Rite Aid Corporation

MARTIN L. GRASS
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer


April 2, 1999


Mr. Eric Sorkin


Dear Eric,

We appreciate your good nature in allowing us to turn you right around again
and, this time, send you and your lovely wife to Phoenix, Arizona. You will no
longer be based at Rite Aid headquarters, but, as you know, Rite Aid is the sole
shareholder of PCS and your duties will be performed for both PCS and Rite Aid.

You have expressed concerns about this move and the remoteness to Rite Aid. For
your assurance, Rite Aid Corporation agrees that if you are no longer employed
by either PCS or Rite Aid ("Such Termination") you will be paid for a period of
three years from the date of Such Termination at the rate of your then
established salary together with a guarantee of the most recent annual bonus
which you had received prior to Such Termination.

In addition, in the event of Such Termination, any stock options in Rite Aid
Corporation held by you at such time shall vest and shall be exercisable in
whole or in part from time to time for the ensuing three years.

Further, starting three years after Such Termination, if at any time you are not
gainfully employed for a period of at least one month you shall have the right
to call for commencement of payments under your Deferred Compensation contract.
If you have done so and thereafter you resume gainful employment, such payments
shall suspend until your 58th birthday at which time you may accelerate the
re-commencement date thereof.

We wish you success and pleasure in Phoenix.


                                            Sincerely,


/jsk                                        /s/ Martin L. Grass
# C_2021362EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2020-2021 SESSION

Sittings of 17 to 19 June 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
#### BASS V. THE STATE.

(three cases)

(Decided May 22, 1913.)

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. 0. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

The appeal in each of these cases is dismissed.
# C_2010277EN.01000301.xml

| 14.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/3

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 277/03

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 30 March 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 61700 |
| Decision number | : | 127/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Rogaland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged aid being granted by sale of land from the municipality of Hå to Risa AS |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Economic sectors | : | Sale of land |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Municipality of Hå |
| Rådshusgata 8 |
| 4368 Varhaug |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

30 March 2010

Case number

:

61700

Decision number

:

127/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

:

Rogaland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged aid being granted by sale of land from the municipality of Hå to Risa AS

Type of measure

:

No aid

Economic sectors

:

Sale of land

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Municipality of Hå

Rådshusgata 8

4368 Varhaug

NORWAY

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2022143EN.01000901.xml

| 31.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/9

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2022/C 143/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15 December 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87779 |
| Decision No | 288/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | The Ocean Space Centre |
| Legal basis | Norwegian state budget 2022 |
| Type of measure | Ad hoc |
| Objective | Research, development and innovation |
| Form of aid | Grant |
| Budget | Up to NOK 8 154 million (P85 estimate) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | 2022-2029 (estimate) |
| Economic sectors | P.85.4-Higher education
  M.72.1-Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering
  M.72.19-Other research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries |
| PO Box 8090 Dep |
| 0032 Oslo, Norway |
| The Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation |
| Postboks 8112 Dep |
| 0032 Oslo, Norway |

Date of adoption of the decision

15 December 2021

Case No

87779

Decision No

288/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

The Ocean Space Centre

Legal basis

Norwegian state budget 2022

Type of measure

Ad hoc

Objective

Research, development and innovation

Form of aid

Grant

Budget

Up to NOK 8 154 million (P85 estimate)

Intensity

100 %

Duration

2022-2029 (estimate)

Economic sectors

P.85.4-Higher education

M.72.1-Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering

M.72.19-Other research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries

PO Box 8090 Dep

0032 Oslo, Norway

The Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation

Postboks 8112 Dep

0032 Oslo, Norway

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 3.151 Introduction and exposure measurement. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) To calculate its risk-weighted asset amounts for equity exposures that are not equity exposures to investment funds, a national bank or Federal savings association may apply either the Simple Risk Weight Approach (SRWA) in § 3.152 or, if it qualifies to do so, the Internal Models Approach (IMA) in § 3.153. A national bank or Federal savings association must use the look-through approaches provided in § 3.154 to calculate its risk-weighted asset amounts for equity exposures to investment funds.
( 2 ) A national bank or Federal savings association must treat an investment in a separate account (as defined in § 3.2), as if it were an equity exposure to an investment fund as provided in § 3.154.
( 3 ) *Stable value protection.* ( i ) Stable value protection means a contract where the provider of the contract is obligated to pay: ( A ) The policy owner of a separate account an amount equal to the shortfall between the fair value and cost basis of the separate account when the policy owner of the separate account surrenders the policy, or
( B ) The beneficiary of the contract an amount equal to the shortfall between the fair value and book value of a specified portfolio of assets.
( ii ) A national bank or Federal savings association that purchases stable value protection on its investment in a separate account must treat the portion of the carrying value of its investment in the separate account attributable to the stable value protection as an exposure to the provider of the protection and the remaining portion of the carrying value of its separate account as an equity exposure to an investment fund.
( iii ) A national bank or Federal savings association that provides stable value protection must treat the exposure as an equity derivative with an adjusted carrying value determined as the sum of § 3.151(b)(1) and (2).
( b ) *Adjusted carrying value.* For purposes of this subpart, the adjusted carrying value of an equity exposure is: ( 1 ) For the on-balance sheet component of an equity exposure, the national bank's or Federal savings association's carrying value of the exposure;
( 2 ) For the off-balance sheet component of an equity exposure, the effective notional principal amount of the exposure, the size of which is equivalent to a hypothetical on-balance sheet position in the underlying equity instrument that would evidence the same change in fair value (measured in dollars) for a given small change in the price of the underlying equity instrument, minus the adjusted carrying value of the on-balance sheet component of the exposure as calculated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) For unfunded equity commitments that are unconditional, the effective notional principal amount is the notional amount of the commitment. For unfunded equity commitments that are conditional, the effective notional principal amount is the national bank's or Federal savings association's best estimate of the amount that would be funded under economic downturn conditions.
# C_2022238EN.01000701.xml

| 21.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 June 2022

(2022/C 238/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0517 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4387 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85748 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0162 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4085 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,728 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 397,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6520 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,2239 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5061 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3662 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2558 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6549 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4589 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 357,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8603 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0346 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 589,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6291 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,872 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,157 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4117 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3016 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,9940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0517

JPY

Japanese yen

141,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4387

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85748

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0162

ISK

Iceland króna

137,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4085

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,728

HUF

Hungarian forint

397,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6520

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

18,2239

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5061

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3662

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2558

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6549

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4589

KRW

South Korean won

1 357,54

ZAR

South African rand

16,8603

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0346

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 589,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6291

PHP

Philippine peso

56,872

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,157

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4117

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3016

INR

Indian rupee

81,9940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# L_2020102EN.01001601.xml

| 2.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/16

---

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION

No 7/20/COL

of 11 February 2020

to amend the Rules of Procedure [2020/482]

THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY

Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, and in particular Article 13 thereof;

Whereas it appears desirable to clarify certain aspects of the Rules of Procedure to ensure a clearer delineation between the deliberations of College, which are confidential pursuant to their Article 10, and the items recorded in the minutes of College meetings;

HAS DECIDED TO:

| 1. | Amend Article 9 of the Rules of Procedure by adding:






  (a) | the words ‘for the first meeting of every month thereafter’ at the end of the last sentence of the first paragraph; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

(a)

the words ‘for the first meeting of every month thereafter’ at the end of the last sentence of the first paragraph;

| (b) | the sentence ‘The draft agenda shall be and shall remain confidential.’ after the first sentence of the second paragraph; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the sentence ‘The draft agenda shall be and shall remain confidential.’ after the first sentence of the second paragraph; and

| (c) | the words ‘to remove an item from the draft agenda, or’ after the second comma in the fourth paragraph of that Article. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the words ‘to remove an item from the draft agenda, or’ after the second comma in the fourth paragraph of that Article.

| 2. | Amend Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure by adding the following text as a new paragraph after the first paragraph of that Article:

  ‘The minutes shall be based on the agenda as approved at the beginning of the meeting and record the substantive decisions in respect of the items on the agenda, i.e. normally whether a proposal has been adopted, rejected or deferred, as well as any items taken note of.’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

‘The minutes shall be based on the agenda as approved at the beginning of the meeting and record the substantive decisions in respect of the items on the agenda, i.e. normally whether a proposal has been adopted, rejected or deferred, as well as any items taken note of.’

This decision shall take effect upon adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2020.

For the EFTA Surveillance Authority,

Bente ANGELL-HANSEN

The President

Frank J. BÜCHEL

College Member

Högni KRISTJÁNSSON

College Member

Carsten ZATSCHLER

Countersigning as Director of Legal and Executive Affairs

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1747

___________________________

Stella Thomas

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: December 9, 2022

Filed: December 14, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Stella Thomas brought this action against her former employer, Wells Fargo

Bank, N.A., alleging multiple instances of racial and gender discrimination and
retaliation. The district court1

 dismissed the action in June 2020 pursuant to a

stipulation of dismissal but granted Thomas’s motion to reopen after she rescinded

the settlement agreement. After substantial discovery, the district court granted Wells

Fargo’s motion for summary judgment. Thomas appeals, raising numerous issues. 

After careful review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough

Opinion and Order. See Stella Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., File No. 19-cv482, Opinion and Order (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2022); 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

-2-
§ 3.206 Stressed VaR-based measure. ( a ) *General requirement.* At least weekly, a national bank or Federal savings association must use the same internal model(s) used to calculate its VaR-based measure to calculate a stressed VaR-based measure.
( b ) *Quantitative requirements for stressed VaR-based measure.* ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association must calculate a stressed VaR-based measure for its covered positions using the same model(s) used to calculate the VaR-based measure, subject to the same confidence level and holding period applicable to the VaR-based measure under § 3.205, but with model inputs calibrated to historical data from a continuous 12-month period that reflects a period of significant financial stress appropriate to the national bank's or Federal savings association's current portfolio.
( 2 ) The stressed VaR-based measure must be calculated at least weekly and be no less than the national bank's or Federal savings association's VaR-based measure.
( 3 ) A national bank or Federal savings association must have policies and procedures that describe how it determines the period of significant financial stress used to calculate the national bank's or Federal savings association's stressed VaR-based measure under this section and must be able to provide empirical support for the period used. The national bank or Federal savings association must obtain the prior approval of the OCC for, and notify the OCC if the national bank or Federal savings association makes any material changes to, these policies and procedures. The policies and procedures must address: ( i ) How the national bank or Federal savings association links the period of significant financial stress used to calculate the stressed VaR-based measure to the composition and directional bias of its current portfolio; and
( ii ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's process for selecting, reviewing, and updating the period of significant financial stress used to calculate the stressed VaR-based measure and for monitoring the appropriateness of the period to the national bank's or Federal savings association's current portfolio.
( 4 ) Nothing in this section prevents the OCC from requiring a national bank or Federal savings association to use a different period of significant financial stress in the calculation of the stressed VaR-based measure.
Exhibit 12.1

I, Pasquale Natuzzi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2018



/s/ Pasquale NatuzziName:

Pasquale NatuzziTitle:

Chief Executive Officer