alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 210.28 Agreement of sender. ( a ) *Payment of sender's obligation to a Federal Reserve Bank.* A sender (other than a Federal Reserve Bank), by maintaining or using an account with a Federal Reserve Bank, authorizes the sender's Federal Reserve Bank to obtain payment for the sender's payment orders by debiting the amount of the payment order from the sender's account.
( b ) *Overdrafts.* ( 1 ) A sender does not have the right to an overdraft in the sender's account. In the event an overdraft is created, the overdraft shall be due and payable immediately, without the need for a demand by the Federal Reserve Bank, at the earliest of the following times: ( i ) At the end of the Fedwire Funds Service funds-transfer business day;
( ii ) At the time the Federal Reserve Bank, in its sole discretion, deems itself insecure and gives notice thereof to the sender; or
( iii ) At the time the sender suspends payments or is closed.
( 2 ) The sender shall have in its account, at the time the overdraft is due and payable, a balance of actually and finally collected funds sufficient to cover the aggregate amount of all its obligations to the Federal Reserve Bank, whether the obligations result from the execution of a payment order or otherwise.
( 3 ) To secure any overdraft, as well as any other obligation due or to become due to its Federal Reserve Bank, each sender, by sending a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank that is accepted by the Federal Reserve Bank, grants to the Federal Reserve Bank a security interest in all of the sender's assets in the possession or control of, or held for the account of, the Federal Reserve Bank. The security interest attaches when an overdraft, or any other obligation to the Federal Reserve Bank, becomes due and payable.
( 4 ) A Federal Reserve Bank may take any action authorized by law to recover the amount of an overdraft that is due and payable, including, but not limited to, the exercise of rights of set off, the realization on any available collateral, and any other rights it may have as a creditor under applicable law.
( 5 ) If a sender, other than a government sender described in § 210.25(d), incurs an overdraft in its account as a result of a debit to the account by a Federal Reserve Bank under paragraph (a) of this section, the account will be subject to any applicable overdraft charges, regardless of whether the overdraft has become due and payable. A Federal Reserve Bank may debit a sender's account under paragraph (a) of this section immediately on acceptance of the payment order.
( c ) *Review of payment orders.* A sender, by sending a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank, agrees that for the purposes of sections 4A-204(a) and 4A-304 of Article 4A, a reasonable time to notify a Federal Reserve Bank of the relevant facts concerning an unauthorized or erroneously executed payment order is within 30 calendar days after the sender receives notice that the payment order was accepted or executed, or that the sender's account was debited with respect to the payment order.
[55 FR 40801, Oct. 5, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 46956, Oct. 14, 1992; Reg. J, 87 FR 34359, June 6, 2022]
Exhibit 10.7

2015 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS PROGRAM

On March 27, 2015, the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of NeoPhotonics Corporation (the “Company”) approved target bonuses for 2015 for its “named executive officers” (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission)  in the amounts set forth below.

 


	
Named Executive Officer
	
 
	
2015 Target
Bonus
Percentage(1)
	
 
	
 
	
2015 Target
Bonus 
Amount(2)
	
 

	
Timothy S. Jenks, President and Chief Executive Officer
	
 
	
 
	
75
	
% 
	
 
	
$
	
300,000
	
 

	
Clyde R. Wallin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 
	
40
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
114,000
	
 

	
Dr. Raymond Cheung, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	
 
	
 
	
40
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
136,000
	
(3) 

	
Dr. Wupen Yuen, Senior Vice President and General Manager
	
 
	
 
	
40
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
110,000
	
 

	
Benjamin L. Sitler, Senior Vice President of Global Sales
	
 
	
 
	
40
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
106,000
	
 




 


	
(1)
	
Target bonuses percentages are expressed as a percentage of 2015 base salary.

	
(2)
	
To the extent the applicable base salary is adjusted in 2015, the dollar amount resulting from the target bonus percentage would be adjusted for the pro rata portion of the year in which the adjusted salary applies.

	
(3)
	
The Target Bonus Amount is calculated in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange rate and Dr. Cheung’s actual bonus, if any, will be paid in RMB.




The Compensation Committee structured target bonuses for the fiscal year 2015 so that payouts would be determined based in part on achievement against corporate objectives, including:

 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
Non-GAAP net income from operations for the fiscal year 2015; and

	
 
	
•
	
 
	
Completion of research and development product platforms expected to generate profitable revenue in fiscal year 2015 and beyond.




 

For target bonuses for the fiscal year 2015, the Compensation Committee established performance goals for each of the above metrics that are aligned with corporate objectives. While these various performance goals were selected, they are merely non-binding guidelines to be used as one factor in determining the actual bonuses earned.

The Compensation Committee may in its discretion award up to fifty percent (50%) of the final earned 2015 bonuses to senior management and U.S. director level employees in the form of restricted stock units.

It is expected that, in the first quarter of 2016, the Compensation Committee will review the Company’s fiscal year 2015 corporate performance against each of the corporate goals and other aspects of corporate and individual performance to determine any actual bonus awards for performance related to the fiscal year 2015.
# C_2021446EN.01001201.xml

| 3.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 446/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 446/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 October 2021

(2021/C 446/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1645 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4389 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9368 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0611 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7495 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,697 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 360,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6215 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,1393 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5455 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4383 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0563 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6255 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5676 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7447 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4488 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5270 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 556,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8222 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,654 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,3284 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,720 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5698 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8048 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,1830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1645

JPY

Japanese yen

132,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4389

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84490

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9368

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0611

ISK

Iceland króna

149,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7495

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,697

HUF

Hungarian forint

360,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6215

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

11,1393

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5455

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4383

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0563

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6255

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5676

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,92

ZAR

South African rand

17,7447

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4488

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5270

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 556,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8222

PHP

Philippine peso

58,654

RUB

Russian rouble

82,3284

THB

Thai baht

38,720

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5698

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8048

INR

Indian rupee

87,1830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter  ended September 30 , 2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Chief   Executive  Officer of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer , Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 10, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 23-24, 2009,                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keary A Cope, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7190, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-2222,                         *copeka@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 27, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-2396 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

617 

CAF 15-00409 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF AZALEAYANNA S.G.-B. 

AND RAJAHALEE D.G.-B. 

---------------------------------------------- 

HERKIMER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

QUANEESHA S.G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

JOHN J. RASPANTE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JACQUELYN M. ASNOE, HERKIMER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Family Court, Herkimer County (John

J. Brennan, J.), entered March 4, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The judgment, among other things,

adjudged that the subject children are abandoned children and

transferred respondent’s guardianship and custody rights to

petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051).

Entered: July 1, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and 

Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/16/2021 08:08 AM CDT
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Miller-Lerman, J., not participating.
42564.

#### STONE MOUNTAIN GRIT COMPANY, INC. v. CHRISTIAN.

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Argued January 4, 1967

Decided January 11, 1967

Rehearing denied January 26, 1967

Hall, Judge.

The employer in this workmen’s compensation case appeals from a judgment of the trial court denying and dismissing its petition to modify a superior court judgment for $5,490 procured by the employee in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Act, *Code*§ 114-711.

The employee’s judgment was based on agreements as to compensation between employee and employer which were approved March 26 and May 20, 1963, by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation. The employer’s petition to modify this judgment was based on a “Supplemental memorandum of agreement as to payment of compensation” signed by employee and employer, and approved by the board on May 20, 1963, reciting that the employee returned to work on March 18, 1963, “And we further agree that liability for temporary total disability ceased on March 18, 1963.”

“Assuming arguendo that parties to an original compensation award or agreement can enter into a new agreement effecting a change in the compensation payable, the approval of such an agreement by the Board of Workmen’s Compensation is not authorized unless the agreement stipulates facts showing that the claimant’s condition has changed since the original award or agreement.” *Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hamilton,*112 Ga. App. 452 (145 SE2d 645), certiorari denied, 112 Ga. App. 896. Where, as here, no supporting facts appear in the new agreement, it must follow that the superior court like the board is not authorized on the basis of this agreement to modify a judgment on behalf of the employee under *Code*§ 114-711.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*103*Woodruff, Saveli, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams, Lawson A. Cox,*for appellant.

*Gilbert, Patton & Carter, Thomas L. Carter, Jr., Edwin G. Schaefer,*for appellee.
# C_2020023EN.01000901.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/9

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Public Procurement Complaints Committee dated 17 September 2019 in the case of Tak – Malbik ehf. v the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Þróttur ehf.

(Case E-7/19)

(2020/C 23/09)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 17 September 2019 from the Public Procurement Complaints Committee (kærunefnd útboðsmála), which was received at the Court Registry on 23 September 2019, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Tak – Malbik ehf. v the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Þróttur ehf. on the following question:

| | Is a contract to be pursued following an invitation to tender, in which tenderers undertake to process and stockpile certain raw materials provided by the contracting authority, and in accordance with the contracting authority’s requirements, considered a works contract within the meaning of Directive 2014/24/EU, cf. in particular paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 2, or a service contract within the meaning of the Directive, cf. in particular Article 2(9)? |
| --- | --- |

Is a contract to be pursued following an invitation to tender, in which tenderers undertake to process and stockpile certain raw materials provided by the contracting authority, and in accordance with the contracting authority’s requirements, considered a works contract within the meaning of Directive 2014/24/EU, cf. in particular paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 2, or a service contract within the meaning of the Directive, cf. in particular Article 2(9)?

---
HomePortuguês...Reunião de Altos Funcionários da Rede de Diplomacia de Reassentamento

# 									Reunião de Altos Funcionários da Rede de Diplomacia de Reassentamento							

Traduções em português

1 de Maio de 2024

Departamento de Estado dos Estados UnidosGabinete do Porta-VozNota para a Imprensa1o de Maio de 2024

De 29 de Abril a 1o de Maio de 2024, a subsecretária de Estado do Gabinete de População, Refugiados e Migração (PRM) dos Estados Unidos, Julieta Valls Noyes, convocou a terceira Reunião de Altos Funcionários da Rede de Diplomacia de Reassentamento (RDN) em Washington, D.C. Sob a presidência dos Estados Unidos, altos funcionários dos Governos da Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, Alemanha, Itália, Nova Zelândia, Espanha e Reino Unido, além de representantes da Comissão Europeia, participaram do encontro.

A reunião proporcionou uma oportunidade para os Estados participantes analisarem o impacto do trabalho da RDN desde a sua reunião ministerial inaugural, em Setembro de 2023, e avaliarem as prioridades para uma acção colectiva contínua para o reassentamento de refugiados e caminhos complementares que ajudem a fortalecer o sistema de protecção global.

Os participantes discutiram a utilização da Plataforma de Coordenação de Emergência estabelecida no âmbito da RDN (também conhecida como mecanismo “Telefone Vermelho”) para facilitar a colaboração rápida em situações de preocupação compartilhada, incluindo o foco contínuo no fornecimento de segurança aos refugiados afegãos que necessitam de protecção. Além disso, os participantes reflectiram sobre as lições de respostas de emergência anteriores ao deslocamento em grande escala e discutiram oportunidades de trabalhar em conjunto para fortalecer o reassentamento global e o sistema de vias de protecção complementares, inclusive através do fortalecimento da infraestrutura de trânsito de emergência existente, utilizando mecanismos inovadores de referência para reassentamento de refugiados e aproveitando modelos de patrocínio orientados para a comunidade. Finalmente, os participantes discutiram a iniciativa Mobilidade Segura e outras oportunidades de coordenação em infraestruturas para apoiar caminhos para o reassentamento.

Os Estados Unidos lançaram a RDN em Setembro de 2022. A Pathways International e o Migration Policy Institute apoiam a presidência da RDN pelos EUA como secretariado da RDN.

----

Veja o conteúdo original: https://www.state.gov/resettlement-diplomacy-network-senior-officials-meeting-2/

*Esta tradução é fornecida como cortesia e apenas o texto original em inglês deve ser considerado oficial.*

Back to Top