alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3021 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3021

 To authorize a major medical facility project at the San Juan, Puerto 
          Rico, Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

 Mr. Acevedo-Vila introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a major medical facility project at the San Juan, Puerto 
          Rico, Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECT, SAN JUAN, 
              PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out a major medical 
facility project at the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, to make improvements, in an amount not to 
exceed $30,000,000, in order to bring that facility into compliance 
with the Department of Veterans Affairs directive designated as the CD-
54 Natural Disasters Directive.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2004 for the 
Construction, Major Projects, account $30,000,000 for the project 
authorized in section 1.
    (b) Limitation.--The project authorized in section 1 may only be 
carried out using--
            (1) funds appropriated for fiscal year 2004 pursuant to the 
        authorization of appropriations in subsection (a);
            (2) funds appropriated for Construction, Major Projects, 
        for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2004 that remain available 
        for obligation; and
            (3) funds appropriated for Construction, Major Projects, 
        for fiscal year 2004 for a category of activity not specific to 
        a project.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009171EN.01003401.xml

| 23.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/34

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty — General block exemption Regulation)

2009/C 171/06

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 3/09 TRA |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Ministry of Agriculture and Food |
| Address | Postboks 8007 Dep. 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 3/09 TRA

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Ministry of Agriculture and Food

Address

Postboks 8007 Dep. 0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

www.regjeringen.no/

Title of the aid measure

The Bioenergy Scheme

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Annual Agricultural Agreement, State Budget, Annual Letter of allocation from The Royal Ministry of Food and Agriculture

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.innovasjonnorge.no/Satsinger/Landbruk/Bioenergiprogrammet/

Type of measure

Scheme

X

Duration

Scheme

1.3.2009 to 1.1.2014

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

X

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Large enterprises

X

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

NOK 3 500 000

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General Objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Training aid (Article 38-39) | Specific training (Article 38(1)) | 25 % | |
| General training (Article 38(2)) | 60 % | |

General Objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Training aid (Article 38-39)

Specific training (Article 38(1))

25 %

General training (Article 38(2))

60 %

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00050-CV

IN RE VAUGHN BIRDWELL

Original Proceeding

M E M O RA N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.1 See Harrell v. State, --- S.W.3d ---,

2009 WL 1567107 (Tex. June 5, 2009).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed June 17, 2009

[OT06]

 

1 We have redesignated this proceeding as “CV” rather than “CR.” See Harrell, --- S.W.3d at ---, 2009 WL 

1567107, at *2; In re Johnson, 280 S.W.3d 866, 869-70, 874 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding).
### Landslides in the Greater Pittsburgh region, Pennsylvania

By: John S. Pomeroy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1229

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2022391EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 October 2022

(2022/C 391/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9723 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4390 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87703 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0015 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9675 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,535 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 428,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8690 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9394 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0686 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5450 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3402 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,6325 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7323 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3967 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 392,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6153 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9669 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5293 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 930,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5436 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,243 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,030 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0456 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4115 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9723

JPY

Japanese yen

141,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4390

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87703

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0015

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9675

ISK

Iceland króna

140,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,535

HUF

Hungarian forint

428,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8690

RON

Romanian leu

4,9394

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0686

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5450

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3402

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,6325

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7323

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3967

KRW

South Korean won

1 392,84

ZAR

South African rand

17,6153

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9669

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5293

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 930,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5436

PHP

Philippine peso

57,243

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,030

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0456

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4115

INR

Indian rupee

79,9555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.2




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30 , 2005  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer
					Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: August 12, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 190 (Thursday, October 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59222-59223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[AC 187-1J]

Schedule of Charges Outside the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the 
availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 187-1J, which transmits an 
updated schedule of charges for services of FAA Flight Standards 
aviation safety inspectors (ASI) outside the United States. The AC has 
been updated in accordance with the procedures listed in Title 14 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 187, Appendix A.

[[Page 59223]]

DATES: This AC is effective on October 1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A copy of this publication may be 
downloaded from: http://www.faa.gov/search/?q=ac+187-1.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tish Thompkins, Flight Standards 
Service, AFS-50, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-0996.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 16, 2015.
John Barbagallo,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-24959 Filed 9-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
42593.

#### SAKOBIE v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

The defendant was charged with robbery by force and intimidation, and convicted of the offense of robbery by intimidation on May 27, 1966. His appeal to this court is based upon the general grounds and other grounds which will more fully appear. *Held:*

1. The evidence, though entirely circumstantial, was sufficient to support the conviction.

2. *Code*§ 59-808 provides “If a juror shall be found competent and he shall not be challenged peremptorily by the State, he shall be put upon the prisoner, and, unless challenged peremptorily by him, shall be sworn to try the cause.” We are of the opinion that this Code section requires that a juror, after acceptance by both the State and the defense, shall be sworn (unless for cause such as sickness, see *Cason v. State,*134 Ga. 786 (4) (68 SE 554)) and that the State, after it discovers the defense accepts a juror, cannot then change its mind ■and excuse the juror. The opposite procedure is required by the statute. By it the *defendant*can strike a juror *after*discovering the State is willing to accept him. However, where it appears, as in the present case, that the State first puts the juror on the defendant, and the defendant accepts the juror by using the words “go to the room,” and “immediately and almost simultaneously upon” the defendant using the words “go to the room” the solicitor general said “the State excuses the juror,” the excusing of the juror by the trial judge over the objection of the defendant will not require a reversal, as the stipulation does not conclusively show that the solicitor general revoked his acceptance and excused the juror *after*ascertaining the defendant had accepted him. The trial judge was in a much better position than this court to determine the question of fact of split-second time, as indicated by the quotations from the stipulation of fact.

3. It does not appear that the alleged erroneous charge was objected to in accordance with Section 6 of the Act approved March 15, 1966 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 498) amending Sec. 17 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31). These requirements of the statute not having been met, this alleged error, therefore, presents no question for review. See *Vogt v. Rice,*114 Ga. App. 251 (2) (150 SE2d 691).

*461
      *Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

Argued February 7, 1967

Decided March 9, 1967

Rehearing denied March 23, 1967.

Robbery. McIntosh Superior Court. Before Judge Durrence. *Paul J. Varner, William B. Killian,*for appellant.

*J. Max Cheney, Solicitor General,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2012369EN.01001201.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 25 April 2012

in Case E-13/11

Granville Establishment v Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt

(Jurisdiction agreements — Freedom to provide and receive services — Discrimination on grounds of nationality — Justification — Remedies for non-conformity with EEA law)

2012/C 369/10

In Case E-13/11 Granville Establishment v Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Fürstliches Landgericht (Princely Court of Justice), Liechtenstein, concerning the interpretation of Articles 4 and 36 of the EEA Agreement with regard to the Liechtenstein Jurisdiction Act, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 25 April 2012, the operative part of which is as follows:

| — | Article 36 EEA precludes a provision of domestic law, such as Section 53a(1) of the Jurisdiction Act, which accords only nationals the right not to be sued abroad on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless that jurisdiction agreement has been publicly recorded. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 36 EEA precludes a provision of domestic law, such as Section 53a(1) of the Jurisdiction Act, which accords only nationals the right not to be sued abroad on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless that jurisdiction agreement has been publicly recorded.

| — | It is for the national court, as far as possible, to interpret and apply the relevant provisions of national law in such a way that it is possible duly to remedy the consequences of the breach of EEA law. In that context, it is for the national court to determine whether the provisions of the Jurisdiction Act or any other national provisions can be applied for the purposes of an interpretation in conformity with EEA law. |
| --- | --- |

—

It is for the national court, as far as possible, to interpret and apply the relevant provisions of national law in such a way that it is possible duly to remedy the consequences of the breach of EEA law. In that context, it is for the national court to determine whether the provisions of the Jurisdiction Act or any other national provisions can be applied for the purposes of an interpretation in conformity with EEA law.

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 33]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ033.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 223]]

Public Law 110-33
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to conform the District 
  charter to revisions made by the Council of the District of Columbia 
  relating to public education. <<NOTE: June 1, 2007 -  [H.R. 2080]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONFORMING DISTRICT CHARTER TO COUNCIL AMENDMENTS 
                              RELATING TO PUBLIC EDUCATION.

    (a) In General.--The District of Columbia Home Rule Act is amended--
            (1) by striking section 452 (sec. 1-204.52, D.C. Official 
        Code); and
            (2) by striking section 495 (sec. 1-204.95, D.C. Official 
        Code).

    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 452 and the item 
relating to section 495.

    Approved June 1, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2080:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 8, considered and passed House.
            May 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Executive Committee, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# Date and Time:

Monday, October 19, 2009 at 3 p.m.

# Subject Matter:

Discussion of Future NSF Budget Accounts.

# Status:

Closed.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Kim Silverman, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                         *Telephone:*                         (703) 292-7000.                    

Ann Ferrante,

Technical Writer/Editor.

[FR Doc. E9-24531 Filed 10-7-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### § 211.603 Commodity swap transactions.

For text of interpretation relating to this subject, see § 208.128 of this chapter.

[56 FR 63408, Dec. 4, 1991]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6147

RAYFORD L. BURKE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K. J. HOLDEN; CHARLES STEVENS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-2-5-BO)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Burke v. Holden, No. CA-96-2-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996).

Appellant's motion for office supplies and legal assistance is

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
NutriGrown, LLC of Baltimore, Maryland, an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent Application Serial No. 11/504,401, ``Fertilizer Formulation for 
Reduction of Nutrient and Pesticide Leaching'', filed on August 14, 
2006.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as NutriGrown, LLC of Baltimore, 
Maryland, has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-24484 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P