alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1511.2 Law governing rights and obligations of the Funding Corporation and Federal Reserve Banks; rights of any Person against the Funding Corporation and the Federal Reserve Banks. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the following are governed solely by the regulations contained in this part 1511, the Securities Documentation and Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars: ( 1 ) The rights and obligations of the Funding Corporation and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Funding Corporation Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of the Book-entry System as it applies to Funding Corporation Securities; and
( 2 ) The rights of any Person, including a Participant, against the Funding Corporation and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Funding Corporation Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of the Book-entry System as it applies to Funding Corporation Securities.
( b ) A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Participant and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 1511.4(c)(1), is governed by the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of the jurisdiction where the head office of the Federal Reserve Bank maintaining the Participant's Securities Account is located. A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Person that is not a Participant, and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 1511.4(c)(1), is governed by the law determined in the manner specified in § 1511.3.
( c ) If the jurisdiction specified in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of this section is a State that has not adopted Revised Article 8 (incorporated by reference, see § 1511.1), then the law specified in paragraph (b) shall be the law of that State as though Revised Article 8 had been adopted by that State.
Incorporation by Reference 

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0929 

December 10, 2010 

The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0929 (Change to the Reporting Date for Inputs to Equations): 

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0924 (Confidential Business Information) 

2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0964 (Call for Information) 

Accessing dockets: 

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket 

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 

The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
SchweizerischeEidgenossenschaftFederalDepartmentoftheEnvironment,Transport,EnergyandConfdrationsuisseCommunicationsDETECConfederazioneSvizzeraFederaOfficeofCivilAviationFOCAConfederaziunsvizraAviationPolicyandStrategyFOCA,CH-3003BernMr.PaulGretchDirector,OfficeforInternationalAviationOfficeoftheAssistantSecretaryforAviationanclInternationalAffairsU.S.DepartmentofTransportation4007thStreet,S.W.,Room6402Washington,DC20590USAReference:0/01/01-02.02.187Yourreference:Qurreference:fjlContactPerson:LaurenceFontanaJungoTel.+41313230410,Fax+41313259212,Laurence.fontana-jungo@bazl.admin.chIttigen,27August2013DeciarationofReciprocityDearMr.GretchIQfZ4—PLLLTheFederalOfficeofCivilAviationofSwitzerlandherewithdeciares,thatitwillconsiderapplicationsbyU.S.aircarriersforapprovaltooperatecharterstoandfromSwitzerlandinaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheAirTransportAgreementbetweentheSwissConfederationandtheUnitedStatesofAmerica,dated21June2010,and,forthosechartersnotspecifiedintheAnnextotheAgreement,onthebasisofcomityandreciprocity.YourssincerelyMarcelZuckschwercitLaurenceFontanaJungoDirectorChiefNegotiatorAirServicesAgreementsHeadAviationPolicyandStrategyFederalOfficeofClviiAviationMühlestrasse3,3063IttigenPostaladdress:CH-3003BernTel.+41313258039/40,Fax+41313258032www.aviation.admin.ch
Exhibit 99.2



                                  CERTIFICATION

     The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as the Chief Financial
Officer of Edison Control Corporation (the "Company") that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

                                         EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION
                                         (Registrant)


Date: June 16, 2003                      /s/  Gregory L. Skaar
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gregory L. Skaar
                                         (Chief Financial Officer)
PARTIES.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1894.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### Herbert et al. v. Harrison Building & Deposit Ass’n et al.

Action to Recover Building Society Deposit.

In an action for a building society deposit, brought against the society, and the administrator’s assignor, the society not disputing the claim and the administrator denying the assignment and claiming the fund, it is error to dismiss the administrator, and the plaintiff can ask reversal on this ground.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

The plaintiffs, in these cases, sued to recover the value of shares in the ■defendant building association, which they claim were transferred to them by Eliza Lloyd, now deceased. The parties made defendant were the building .association and Frank Bowles, administrator of Eliza Lloyd. The building ■association answered, admitting that it had in its possession money belonging to Eliza Lloyd, and asking the direction of the court as to whom it should be paid. The administrator answered, denying that Eliza Lloyd transferred her shares in the defendant association to the plaintiffs, as alleged by them. The court below ■dismissed the administrator as not a proper party to the suit, and on the issue joined between the plaintiffs and the building association found for the latter.

*395*George B. Goodhart*and *Matthews &*Cleveland, for the plaintiffs in error.

*P. W. Francis*and *Hollister &*Hollister, for the administrator.

Swing, J.

These causes should be reversed. The only issue joined, and the only proper issue to be joined, was between the plaintiffs and Bowles, the administrator. The building association had no right to contest the matter. It stood willing to pay to the proper owners the amounts due. The administrator and the other parties claimed to be the rightful owners. The issue was between them, and the administrator was not only a proper party, but the real party in interest, and the judgment should have been either for or against either of these parties; but the court found that the administrator was not a proper party, and dismissed his answer and cross-petition. When this was done it left no issue to try between the plaintiffs and building association. The plaintiff’s petition then stood without a denial as to their allegations, and judgment should have been rendered in their favor. But the court found for the building association on the issues joined between it and the plaintiffs, when in fact there were no issues joined. This was error in our judgment, and the judgments should be reversed, and the causes remanded for further proceedings.
Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us

Publications + advanced search



### SWFSC 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive La Jolla, CA 92037- 1508 ph: (858) 546-7000 fx: (858) 546-7003 

## SWFSC Fisheries Ecology Publication Search To obtain copies of publications, please contact the SWFSC Santa Cruz Librarian 

### Search the Index Catalog Lab Contribution #

Keyword(Title, Journal Name or Author) with all of the words with at least one of the words with the exact phrase Publication Year (e.g. 1995, 2002-2005)
Sort by Publication Year Author 

## Search Last modified: 5/20/2014 8:18:50 AM Home 

### | Site Map 

### | Glossary 

### | FAQs 

### | Links 

### | Privacy Policy 

### | Disclaimer 

### | Contact Us Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search SWFSC Technical Memorandums ABOUT US DIVISIONS RESEARCH SPECIES PUBLICATIONS DATA PORTAL EDUCATION MULTIMEDIA GALLERY 

# Page 1 of1 SWFSC -Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search

5/20/2014 https://swfsc.noaa.gov/publications/fedbin/qrypublications.asp
Mario F. Fabrizio July 11, 2015

290 Calamus Circle

Medina, MN 55340

Cell (612) 360-9017

Email: mario@fabrizios.com

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Petition for Amendment to Exemption 11950 Issued to Mario F. Fabrizio 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA-2015-1472)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Mario F. Fabrizio, referred to hereafter as the Petitioner, requests that the FAA grant an amendment 

to the referenced exemption to include the following items:

1) Modify references from “Mario F. Fabrizio” to “Mario F. Fabrizio dba Planeview Services”

Since submitting the original exemption request, the Petitioner has established a “dba” name for 

providing the commercial services and desires to have this accurately reflected.

2) Expand the target for services from the originally requested “fire departments and other 

emergency service organizations” to include “and any other organizations or individuals”

The ability to provide commercially reasonable services requires the Petitioner to have the 

flexibility to reach larger target markets, thereby enabling a cost efficiency, and furthering the 

business of the Petitioner. This only effects the target audience to which services will be 

potentially marketed. All operations, use and limitations of the UAS will remain unchanged from 

the previously granted exemption.

3) Add the DJI Phantom 3 Professional to the exemption

The original exemption included the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. The Petitioner desires to also use 

the DJI Phantom 3 professional in its operations. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional is, in all 

practical aspects of its flight characteristics, the same as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ which was 

previously granted in the original exemption. The difference lies mainly in the camera system and 

its associated software. All previous safety standards and features from the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

+ are incorporated into the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as some additional, and more 

intuitive, remote control functions. 

The Petitioner will use the DJI Phantom 3 Professional in its business the same way, in an 

accordance with the same procedures, use and limitations, as originally granted.

The operator’s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional, as well as the quick start manual, are 

available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download. The file size is 13.2mb and 

will not upload to the Regulations.gov website due to 

Respectfully submitted

Mario F. Fabrizio
§ 1073.303 Procedures to request a hearing. ( a ) To request a hearing, an employee must send a written request to the designated official indicated in the Notice of Intent stating why the employee believes the determination concerning the existence or amount of debt is in error. The request must be received by the Bureau within 15 calendar days following the employee's receipt of the Notice of Intent.
( b ) The request must be signed by the employee and fully identify and explain with reasonable specificity all the facts, evidence, and witnesses, if any, which the employee believes support his or her position. The request for hearing must state whether the employee is requesting an oral or documentary hearing. If an oral hearing is requested, the request shall explain why the matter cannot be resolved by a review of documentary evidence alone.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         282,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,706,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   390,800
<INVENTORY>                                 29,703,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,717,045
<PP&E>                                      33,422,249
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,364,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,038,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,599,496
<BONDS>                                        873,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,289
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,826,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,038,877
<SALES>                                     83,855,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,855,241
<CGS>                                       57,277,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,277,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,438,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             779,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                402,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                   836,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (434,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (434,005)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
From: Leslie_Cramer@aksteel.com [mailto:Leslie_Cramer@aksteel.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:33 PM 

To: Richard Parker; Eric_Petersen@aksteel.com 

Cc: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Brian Coffey; Bruce Smith; 

Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Clark Silcox; 

Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg 

Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; 

Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. 

Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; 

Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard Parker; Rick 

Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; 

Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: Comments on Supply 

You are receiving this email as the original message was too large. This is email 1 of 2. 

As requested, please find attached our comments regarding core material supply. 

Leslie Cramer Administrative Assistant Research 

AK Steel Corporation 

leslie_cramer@aksteel.com

(513) 425-5908 

Confidentiality Notice 

This message is intended exclusively for the individual or 

entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, 

proprietary, or otherwise private information. 

If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized 

to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or 

any part of it. If you have received this message in error, 

please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete 

all copies of the message.
March 24, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Jennings

1894 Connemara Drive

Atlanta GA, 30341

Dear Mr. Jennings:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 17, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0405), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### §§ 3.174-3.200 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              10,297
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    11,313
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              94,818
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                95,360
<LOANS>                                            157,931
<ALLOWANCE>                                          1,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     283,587
<DEPOSITS>                                         263,156
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  1,542
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                33
<OTHER-SE>                                          18,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                      18,889
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     14,032
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    5,243
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       447
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    19,722
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   9,117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9,119
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               10,603
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          745
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      8,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,901
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           2,704
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                            920
<LOANS-PAST>                                           154
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     1,592
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          516
<RECOVERIES>                                            17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    1,838
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 1,838
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                196



</TABLE>
§ 263.40 Review by the Board. ( a ) *Notice of submission to the Board.* When the Board determines that the record in the proceeding is complete, the Board will serve notice upon the parties that the proceeding has been submitted to the Board for final decision.
( b ) *Oral argument before the Board.* Upon the initiative of the Board or on the written request of any party filed with the Board within the time for filing exceptions, the Board may order and hear oral argument on the recommended findings, conclusions, decision, and order of the ALJ. A written request by a party must show good cause for oral argument and state reasons why arguments cannot be presented adequately in writing. A denial of a request for oral argument may be set forth in the Board's final decision. Oral argument before the Board must be on the record.
( c ) *Board's final decision.* ( 1 ) Decisional employees may advise and assist the Board in the consideration and disposition of the case. The final decision of the Board will be based upon review of the entire record of the proceeding, except that the Board may limit the issues to be reviewed to those findings and conclusions to which opposing arguments or exceptions have been filed by the parties.
( 2 ) The Board will render a final decision within 90 days after notification of the parties that the case has been submitted for final decision, or 90 days after oral argument, whichever is later, unless the Board orders that the action or any aspect thereof be remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings. Copies of the final decision and order of the Board will be served upon each party to the proceeding, upon other persons required by statute, and, if directed by the Board or required by statute, upon any appropriate State or Federal supervisory authority.