alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW143962]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from North American Explorer Inc., and Bellevue Resources, Inc., for competitive oil and gas lease WYW143962 for land in Campbell County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended                           ( print page 52258)                        lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW143962 effective February 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E9-24404 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### § 269a.3 Intervenor.

The term *intervenor* means the party in a proceeding whose intervention has been permitted or directed by the panel or its designated officer.
#### § 1808.605 Agency Administrative Fee.

The Qualified Issuer shall pay the CDFI Fund annually a fee equal to 10 basis points (0.1 percent) of the amount of the unpaid principal of the Bond(s). The initial Agency Administrative Fee must be paid in full as a condition to closing any Agreement to Guarantee, no later than the effective date of the Agreement to Guarantee.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3022

To protect children’s health by ensuring that chickens and chicken products 

purchased for national school nutrition programs have not been fed 

or administered fluoroquinolone antibiotics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To protect children’s health by ensuring that chickens and 

chicken products purchased for national school nutrition 

programs have not been fed or administered 

fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘School Nutrition 

5 Antibiotic Safety Act’’. 
2

•HR 3022 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE PURCHASE OF CHICKENS 

2 AND CHICKEN PRODUCTS FED OR ADMINIS3 TERED FLUOROQUINOLONES. 

4 (a) SCHOOL LUNCH AND BREAKFAST PROGRAMS.—

5 Section 14(d) of the Richard B. Russell National School 

6 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1762a(d)) is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

8 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period and 

9 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding after paragraph (5) the following 

11 new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(6) ensure that chickens and chicken products 

13 purchased for such programs have not been fed or 

14 administered a fluoroquinolone.’’. 

15 (b) SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHIL16 DREN.—Section 13 of the Richard B. Russell National 

17 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761) is amended by adding 

18 at the end the following new subsection: 

19 ‘‘(r) In providing assistance under this section, the 

20 Secretary shall establish procedures which will ensure that 

21 chickens and chicken products purchased for such pro22 grams have not been fed or administered a 

23 fluoroquinolone.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51876-51877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORV00000.L10200000.DD0000; HAG 9-0373]


Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory 
Council (SEORAC) will meet as indicated below:

DATES: The SEORAC meeting will begin 8 a.m. PST on November 10, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The SEORAC will meet at the Burns District Office Conference 
Room, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Wilkening, 100 Oregon Street, 
Vale, Oregon 97918, (541) 473-6218 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264b47544d79514f4a4d43484f484166444a4b08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93fef2e1f8cce4fafff8f6fdfafdf4d3f1fffebdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting will take place on 
November 10, 2009 at the Burns District Office Conference Room, 28910 
Highway 20 West, Hines Oregon, from 8 a.m.to 4 p.m. The meeting may 
include such topics as New Member Orientation, Election of Officers, 
2010 SEORAC Work Plan, BLM Energy Project Team Status Report, Updates 
on Lakeview and Southeast Oregon Resource Management Plans, Fremont-
Winema Travel Subcommittee, Phase II Blue Mountain Forest Plan 
revision, litigation updates, an update on the BLM sagebrush/sage-
grouse teams, and other matters as may reasonably come before the 
council. The public is welcome to attend all portions of the meeting 
and may make oral comments to the Council at 1 p.m. on November 10, 
2009. Those who verbally address the SEORAC are asked to provide a 
written statement of their comments or presentation. Unless otherwise 
approved by the SEORAC Chair, the public comment period will last no 
longer than 15 minutes, and each speaker may address the SEORAC for a 
maximum of five minutes. If reasonable accommodation is required, 
please contact the BLM Vale District Office at (541) 473-6213 as soon 
as possible.


[[Page 51877]]


    Dated: September 30, 2009.
David R. Henderson,
Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-24322 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 263.15 Opportunity for informal settlement.

Any respondent may, at any time in the proceeding, unilaterally submit to Enforcement Counsel written offers or proposals for settlement of a proceeding, without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties. Any such offer or proposal may only be made to Enforcement Counsel. Submission of a written settlement offer does not provide a basis for adjourning or otherwise delaying all or any portion of a proceeding under this part. No settlement offer or proposal, or any subsequent negotiation or resolution, is admissible as evidence in any proceeding.
# crowell ~'~ 

# moring 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washingtan, DC 20004-2595■ p 202 624-2500■ f 202 628-5116

Gerald F. Murphy (202)508-8855 gmurphy@crowell.com

June 2, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation Room W86-316 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Results for Joint Application of SkyWest and Republic for Statements of Authorization and Joint Blanket Codeshare Notice, Docket DOT-OST-2015-0118

Dear Mr. Gretch:

United has polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the attached service list for the above-referenced Joint Application of SkyWest l and Republic d/b/a United Express (collectively, "Joint Applicants"). United, Ethiopian and the Joint Applicants request prompt approval of the Joint Application so that the marketing and sale of their codeshare services can begin without delay.

Respectfully submitted,

Gera d F. Murphy

Counsel for United Airlines, Inc.

cc: Ethan Blank, Todd Emerson, Robert Finamore, Brian Hedberg, Brett Kruger All Parties on the attached Service List

1 Common names are used for airlines.

Crowell & Moring LLP . www.crowell.com . Washington, DC . New York . San Francisco . Los Angeles . Orange County . Anchorage . London . BrusselsSERVICE LIST

dheffernann,cozen.com esahr(creckertseamans.com jeremy.ross(a),alaskaair.com dderco ci,eckertseamans.com robert.wirickkaa.com robert.landkjetblue.com howard.kasskaa.com bob.kneisley(a),wnco.com jrichardsonkj ohnlrichardson.com leslie.abbotta,wnco.com j cannykamerij et.com dkirsteinkyklaw.com mommerkatlasair.com jyoung(kyklaw.com sascha.vanderbellen(kdelta.com john.fredericksenksuncountry.com sametta.c.barnettgdelta.com thomas.tingksuncountry.com cefeltsgfedex.com anita.mosnerkhklaw.com nssparkskfedex.com jennifer.nowakghklaw.com robert.cohn(

~

a,hoganlovells.com barbara.russella,virginamerica.com patrick.rizzikhoganlovells.com john.varleyn,virginamerica.com jhill ci,cooley.com william.stallin s g L na,usdoLgov perkmannkcooley.com dwight.moorektranscom.mil matwood cr e ,cozen.com j ohn.s.duncankfaa. _gov

Crowell & Moring LLP . www.crowell.com . Washington, DC . New York . San Francisco . Los Angeles . Orange County . Anchorage . London . Brussels
# C_2023282EN.01000301.xml

| 11.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 August 2023

(2023/C 282/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1019 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4512 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86313 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6940 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9618 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,1785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,223 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 385,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9432 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,7942 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6767 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4764 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6127 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8123 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4826 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 446,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,6870 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9434 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 720,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0368 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,820 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,583 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3872 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7458 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 91,0983 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1019

JPY

Japanese yen

158,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4512

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86313

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6940

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9618

ISK

Iceland króna

144,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,1785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,223

HUF

Hungarian forint

385,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4548

RON

Romanian leu

4,9432

TRY

Turkish lira

29,7942

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6767

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4764

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6127

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8123

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4826

KRW

South Korean won

1 446,32

ZAR

South African rand

20,6870

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9434

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 720,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0368

PHP

Philippine peso

61,820

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,583

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3872

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7458

INR

Indian rupee

91,0983

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 31, 2002

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF ST. LOUIS, ] Appeal from the United

INCORPORATED, CIGNA HEALTHCARE ] States District Court for

OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, and CIGNA ] the Northern District of

CORPORATION, ] Illinois, Eastern Division.

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, ] 

 ] No. 01 C 5130

No. 02-1278 v. ] 

 ] Ruben Castillo,

TIMOTHY N. KAISER, M.D., In his ] Judge.

capacity as class representative in ] 

a class action filed in the Circuit ] 

Court, 3d Judicial Circuit, Madison ] 

County, Illinois, MIDWEST NEOPAD ] 

ASSOCIATES, LIMITED, NORTHWESTERN ] 

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., ] 

 Defendants-Appellees. ]

The following are before the court:

1. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF

CORRECTED OPINION, filed on July 9, 2002, by counsel for

appellees.

2. APPELLANTS’ RESPONSE TO APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR

ISSUANCE OF CORRECTED OPINION, filed on July 26, 2002, by

counsel for appellants.

IT IS ORDERED that the APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF

CORRECTED OPINION is GRANTED. The Court amends its opinion dated 
Appeal No. 02-1278 Page 2

June 21, 2002, to the extent that the phrase “including one of the named plaintiffs”

on page 10 of the slip opinion is deleted, so that the sentence shall read as follows:

We are not certain that he will; his actions in certifying a

class even though many of its members were basing their claims on

contracts containing arbitration clauses, in allowing discovery on

the merits to proceed before ruling on arbitrability, and in delaying

as long as he has ruling on that question (CIGNA moved the state

judge for an order to arbitrate in July 2001, almost a year ago), do

make us wonder whether federal arbitration rights may not be a

second-order concern for him.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                                       6,867,624
<SECURITIES>                                                 7,040,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                                6,031,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            20,058,715
<PP&E>                                                       1,766,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 840,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              32,014,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       11,679,118
<BONDS>                                                        934,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                       146,150
<OTHER-SE>                                                  19,314,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                32,014,929
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             5,552,069
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                5,492,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             236,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 59,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  (249,911)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            414,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                              (1,281,184)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (866,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.35)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Availability of the Fiscal Year 2008 Missile Defense Agency 
Services Contracts Inventory

AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency (MDA), DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 2330a of title 10 United States 
Code as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (NDAA 08) section 807, the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency and the Office of the Director, Defense Procurement and 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Strategic Sourcing (DPAP/SS) will make 
available to the public the first inventory of activities performed 
pursuant to contracts for services. The inventory will be published to 
the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Web site at the following location: 
http://www.mda.mil/barbb/barbb.htm.

DATES: Inventory to be made publically available within 30 days after 
publication of this notice.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments and suggestions concerning this 
inventory to Pamela Bible, Procurement Analyst, MDA/DACP 7100 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20307-7100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Bible at (703) 882-6062 or e-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5000313d353c317e1239323c35103d34317e3d393c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="742415191118155a361d161811341910155a191d18">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-24508 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.8
                         Schedule of Omitted Documents

     Pursuant to Instruction No. 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, MGM Grand,
Inc., has omitted from the Exhibits filed with its Current Report on Form 8-K
the Chase Manhattan Bank Guarantee II, which differs from the Firstar Bank of
Minnesota Guarantee filed as Exhibit 10.6 to this Current Report solely to the
extent that each guaranty supports a different agreement.  The signatory parties
and substantive text of both guarantees are exactly the same.  Only the parties
in whose favor the guarantees were executed and the recital stating the interest
rate and maturity date of the obligations being guaranteed are different, the
Firstar Bank of Minnesota Guarantee being in favor of Firstar Bank of Minnesota,
N.A. with respect to $250,000,000 of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2006 and the Chase
Manhattan Bank Guarantee II being in favor of The Chase Manhattan Bank with
respect to $200,000,000 of 6.625% Notes due February 1, 2005 and $200,000,000 of
Notes due August 1, 2017.
§ 303.14 Being “engaged in the business of receiving deposits other than trust funds.” ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a depository institution shall be “engaged in the business of receiving deposits other than trust funds” only if it maintains one or more non-trust deposit accounts in the minimum aggregate amount of $500,000.
( b ) An applicant for federal deposit insurance under section 5 of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1815(a), shall be deemed to be “engaged in the business of receiving deposits other than trust funds” from the date that the FDIC approves deposit insurance for the institution until one year after it opens for business.
( c ) Any depository institution that fails to satisfy the minimum deposit standard specified in paragraph (a) of this section as of two consecutive call report dates (*i.e.,* March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st) shall be subject to a determination by the FDIC that the institution is not “engaged in the business of receiving deposits other than trust funds” and to termination of its insured status under section 8(p) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1818(p). For purposes of this paragraph, the first three call report dates after the institution opens for business are excluded.
( d ) Notwithstanding any failure by an insured depository institution to satisfy the minimum deposit standard in paragraph (a) of this section, the institution shall continue to be “engaged in the business of receiving deposits other than trust funds” for purposes of section 3 of the FDI Act until the institution's insured status is terminated by the FDIC pursuant to a proceeding under section 8(a) or section 8(p) of the FDI Act. 12 U.S.C. 1818(a) or 1818(p).