SPEC|ALT¥ CONSULT|NG, LTD.
Air ua|i Test
Emission Compliance Testing

for HE HCI,

and

PM ACME Brick

Company Sealy, Texas Tunnel Kiln

Exhaust

Stack NSR Permit Number

9540 and 40CFR63,

Subpart

JJJJJ Revision 1 Prepared for:

Mr. Jason Pence Acme Brick Company 2821 West 7 th AStreet Ft. Worth,

TX 76107 (817) 870-8348 Prepared by:

Golden

Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (281) 476- 9898 Date Tested: Date Revised:

April 12, 2006 November 27, 20016

931 Seaco Court = P.O. Box 1898. Deer Park, Texas 77536 Phone: 281-476-9898.

Fax: 281-476-9876.

www.goldenspecialty.comEmission Compliance Testing

for HE HCI,

and

PM ACME Brick Sealy, Texas Company

Tunnel Kiln

Exhaust

Slack NSR Permit Number

9540 and 40CFR63,

Subpart

JJJJJ Revision 1 Prepared for:

Mr. Jason Pence Acme Brick Company 2821 West 7 th AStreet Ft. Worth,

TX 76107 (817) 870-8348 Prepared by:

Golden

Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (281) 476 9898
Date Tested: Date Revised:

April 12, 2006 November 27, 2006Table of Contents
Executive Summary

...................................................................................................................................................... Table 1-1. Summary

of Results (3- run Average) Introduction

.................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Test Procedures

........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Test Overview

........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Table 1-2. Test Methods

...................................................................................................................................... 3 Test Methodologies

and Procedures

........................................................................................................................... 4 Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses

for Stationary

Sources 4 Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination

of Dry Molecular

Weight 4 Method 4: Determination

of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 4 Figure 1-1. Method 5 Sampling

Train 7 Method 5: Determination

of Particulate

Matter in Stationary

Sources 5 Method 320: Determination

of Gaseous

Compounds

by Extractive

Fourier Transform

Infrared (FTIR)

9 Figure 1-2 -Schematic

of RMFTIR System 78 Meter 10 Source Information

..................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 1-3. Diagram of kiln stack sampling

location 13 Figure 1-4. Diagram of DLA Inlet sampling

location 14 Sample Calculations

.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Calculations

......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Test Results

............................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 1-3. Summary

Table of Compliance

Testing Kiln Stack 19 Table 1-4. Summary

Table of Compliance

Testing DLA Inlet 20 Appendix A Testing Equipment

Used A Table 1-5. Testing Equipment A Appendix B Personnel

............................................................................................................................................... B Appendix C Calibration

Data

..................................................................................................................................... C Appendix D Field Data

.............................................................................................................................................. D Appendix E Reference

Method Data E Appendix F Process Data

......................................................................................................................................... F Appendix G Laboratory

Data

.................................................................................................................................... GAIR QUALITY" TEST REPORT

On April 12, 2006, Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (GOLDEN)

was contracted

by ACME Brick Company to perform

air testing on the kiln stack, EPN-1, at their facility located in Sealy, Texas. This Test Program

was performed

to demonstrate

compliance

with ACME Brick's permit 9540; Texas Commission

on Environmental

Quality; and the Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR), Title 40 Part 63, Subpart JJJJJ. For the compliance

test program,

three (3) 1-hour test runs were performed.

All testing was performed by experienced

test personnel

in accordance

with United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA),

Code of Federal

Regulations,

Title 40, Part 60 (40CFR60),

and 40CFR63, Subpart J J J J J, for hazardous

air pollutants

(HAP) emitted from brick and structural

clay products (BSCP) manufacturing

facilities.

Plant personnel

monitored

and recorded

process

conditions

and relevant diagnostic

step changes

during testing to verify operating

conditions.

Included

in this test report are sections

detailing

the proposed

Test Program,

including

Executive

Summary,

Introduction, Sampling Procedures,

Source Information,

Sample

Calculation

and Test Results

Sections;

with Appendices which will include all quality assurance

documentation,

calibrations,

field data, process data, calculated

data, and resumes

of key personnel. All sampling

and analysis

was performed

in accordance

with US EPA Methods

1,2, 3, 4, 5, and 320. All methods

are discussed

in the Performance

Test Procedures

section of this report. Tables 1-1 presents

the compliance

results of the test program

performed

on the kiln stack. The unit was operated

at an average

of 21:08 ton per hour during testing.

Process

data collect by ACME personnel is included

in Appendix

F of this report
Dry Volumetric Flow Rate Hydrogen Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride Hydrogen Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride

dscfm ppmd

DLA inlet 20,419 206.62

Kiln Stack 20,369 22.38

DRE

89.17% ppmd 18.81

9.91

47.32% Ib/hr 13.14

1.60

87.82% Ib/hr 1.29 2.18 Particulate Ib/hr

N/A

2.18 Tal)le t-t. Summary

of Results

(3- Run •,verage)

40.83% N/A

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD "1 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

The purpose

of the compliance

test on the kiln stack was to demonstrate

compliance

for pollutant
mass emissions.

Pollutants

tested included

hydrogen

fluoride (HF), hydrogen

chloride

(HCI), and particulate matter (PM) as required

by ACME permit 9540. The compliance

for the kiln stack consisted

of measuring

for emissions

concentrations

of HF, HCl, and PM in accordance

with Reference

Methods

(RMs) 1-5 and 320. Specifically,

three (3)onehour test runs were performed

for the determination

of HF and HCI using a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

at the inlet and outlet of the dry lime absorption

(DLA) system. Methods 1-4 were performed

at the inlet of the DLA system concurrently

with the FTIR sampling

for the determination

of mass rates and DLA removal

efficiency.

The Reference

Methods

are discussed in greater detail in the Performance

Test Procedures

section of this report. Plant personnel monitored

and recorded

process

conditions

during testing to verify operating

conditions. Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (GOLDEN)

was contracted

by the ACME Brick Company

to provide emission

testing of the Kiln Stack EPN-1.

Mr. Jeff Knapp managed

the project, and was assisted by Messrs.

Greg Burch, Gordon

Gossett,

and Matt Brumley

of GOLDEN.

Testing was coordinated by Mr. Mike O'Connor

of ACME Brick and witnessed

by Gary Tidwell, State Observer, of the Texas Commission

on Environmental

Quality (TCEQ). Prob|ems •=.countered No problems

were encountered

during this testing period.

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 2 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

'T'es• ¢•verv•ew The test program

for the DLA system consisted

of sampling

at the inlet and outlet location per test methods and sampling

strategies

presented

below in Table 1-2.

Sampling/Traverse Points

Inlet/Outlet:

EPA Method 1 Velocity/Volumetric Flow Rate

Inlet/Outlet:

EPA Method 2

S-type Pitot tube
Molecular Weight Inlet/Outlet:

EPA Method 3

Selective Adsorption
Moisture Content Inlet/Outlet:

EPA Method 4

Gravimetdc Particulate Matter Outlet: EPA Method 5

Gravimetric HF/HCI Inlet/Outlet

EPA Method 320 FTIR Table 1-2. Tes• Methods

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 3 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

This section provides

a detailed

description

of the methodology

and procedures

used to conduct this program. Test methods

from USEPA

40 CFR 60, and 63, Appendix

A were employed

as written, unless otherwise

specified

below.

Nlethod t: Sample

and Velocity

Traverses

for Stationary

Sources Sampling traverse

points were determined

based on the ratio of the stack diameter to the upstream

and downstream

distances

of the sampling

plane to the closest disturbances.

The minimum

number of traverse

points on the sampling plane was determined

from Figure 1-2 and Table 1-2 of 40CFR60, Appendix A, Method 1. Method 2: Determination

of Stack Gas Velocity

and Volumetric

Flow Rate (Type-S

Pitot Tube) The average

velocity of the stream was determined

from differential

pressure readings at each traverse

point using a Type-S Pitot tube and manometer. The Pitot tube was constructed

per Method

2 design specifications

and a correction coefficient

of 0.84 was assigned.

Volumetric

flow rate was calculated to dry, standard

conditions

from the average

differential

pressure,
source temperature,

and moisture

measurements.
Method 3: Gas Analysis

for the Determination

of Dry Molecular

Weight This method was employed

to determine

the concentrations

of 02 and 002 in the gas stream with the use of a Fyrite combustion

analyzer.

Integrated Tedlar@ bag samples

were collected

and passed through selective

adsorbent solutions for determination

of diluent concentrations

by volumetric

difference.

Method 4: Determination

of Moisture

Content

in Stack Gases The stack gas moisture

content was determined

in accordance

with US EPA Reference Method

4 as shown in Figure 1-2. Specifically,

stack gas was extracted at a constant

rate through

a glass condenser

train consisting

of four impingers

connected

in series with leak free, glass U•tube connections. The extracted

stack gas sample

temperature

was maintained

at a temperature below 68°F by use of an ice bath surrounding

the glass impingers. The gas sample was extracted

through the impinger

train using a rotary vane vacuum

pump, and the amount of gas sampled

was measured with a calibrated

dry gas meter. The pump flow was adjusted

to maintain flow rate through

the dry gas meter in order to obtain at least 21.0 dry, standard cubic feet (dscf) of sample gas during the test run. At the end of each run, the pump was turned off and the final readings

were recorded.

The amount of moisture

in the gas stream was determined

by measuring

the volume of condensed

moisture

in impingers

one through three and weighing

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 4 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT the silica gel impinger

to calculate

percent moisture

in the stack flue gas stream. One moisture

run was performed

for every three RA runs.
Method 5: Determination

of Particulate

Emissions

from Stationary Sources Testing Equipment A buttonhook

probe nozzle made of stainless

steel with a sharp, tapered leading edge was used. The angle of the taper was <30 and the taper was on the outside to preserve

a constant

internal diameter.

A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic

sampling

from 1/8 tol/2 inch was available

the day of testing, and each nozzle was calibrated.

The probe liner was made of borosilicate glass tubing with a heating system capable

of maintaining

a gas temperature at the exit end during sampling

of 120+14°C

(248 4-_ 25OF).
A Type S pitot tube was attached

to the probe (as shown in Figure 1-1) to allow constant

monitoring

of the stack gas velocity.

The impact (high pressure) opening

plane of the pitot tube was even with or above the nozzle entry plane during sampling.

The Type S pitot tube assembly

has a correction coefficient,

typically

0,84 when physical

criteria are met. A dual inclined/vertical oil-guage

manometer

was used for velocity

head (Dp) and orifice differential

pressure

readings.

A borosilicate

glass filter holder, with a glass frit filter support

and a Teflon®

coated gasket was used. The holder design has a positive

pressure

seal against

leakage

from the outside or around the filter. The holder is attached

immediately

at the outlet of the probe.
A filter heating

system

utilized for this test is capable

of maintaining

a temperature around the filter holder during the sampling

of 120+14°C (248+25°F). A temperature

gauge capable

of measuring

temperature

to within 3°C (5,4°F) is installed

so that the temperature

around the filter holder can be regulated

and monitored

during sampling. The impinger

train used to remove moisture

from the gas sample consisted of four impingers

connected

in series with leak-free

ground glass fittings or any similar leak-free

non-contaminating

fittings.

The first, third and fourth impingers were of the Greenburg-Smith

design that have been modified

by replacing the tip with a 1.3 cm (I/2 in.) ID glass tube extending

to about 1.3 cm (1/2 in.) from the bottom of the flask. The second impinger

was of the Greenburg-Smith design with the standard

tip. A thermometer,

capable

of measuring temperature

to within 1°C (2°F) was placed at the outlet of the fourth impinger

for exit temperature

monitoring

purposes. The metering

system is made up of the following:

vacuum

gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers

capable

of measuring

temperature

to within 3°C (5.4°F), dry gas meter (DGM) capable

of measuring

volume

to within 2 percent, and related equipment,

as shown in Figure 1-1.

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 5 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT Preparation of Sample

Train Co|iection During preparation

and assembly

of the sampling

train, all openings

where contamination can occur are kept covered

until just prior to assembly

or until sampling is about to begin. 100 mL of distilled,

deionized

water was placed in the first two impingers,

the third impinger

was left empty, and silica gel, pre-weighed to the nearest

0.5 g was placed in the fourth impinger.

Using tweezers or clean disposable

surgical

gloves, a labeled

(identified)

and weighed filter was placed in the filter holder. The probe was marked

to denote the sample point locations,

and crushed

ice was placed around the impingers just before the start of sampling. Sample Train Operation During the sampling

run, an isokinetic

sampling

rate was maintained,

and a temperature of 248 + 25°F was maintained

around the filter. For each run, pertinent data was recorded

on the appropriate

data sheet. The portholes
were cleaned

prior to the test run to minimize

the chance

of drawing deposited material

into the sample.

The stack cross-section

was traversed,
as required

by Method 5, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when sampling

near the walls or when removing

or inserting

the probe through

the portholes;

this minimizes

the chance

of extracting deposited material. During the test run, periodic

adjustments

were made to maintain

an isokinetic sampling rate, and additional

ice was added to the impinger

train in order to maintain an impinger

outlet temperature

of 68°F or lower. Also, periodic checks of the manometer

were made to insure it was level and zeroed. At the end of the sample run, the coarse adjust valve was closed, the probe and nozzle was removed

from the stack, the pump was turned off, the final DGM meter reading

was recorded,

and a post-test

leak-check

was conducted. Also, the pitot lines were leak-checked.

The lines must pass this leak-check in order to validate

the velocity head data. Finally, the percent isokinetic was calculated

to determine

whether

the run was valid or another test run should be made.

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 6 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

TEMPERATURE SENSOR

IMPINGER

TP•kl N •

m

• • •

THERMOMETER Nozzle / L •

•I'•I I•I ,=•I

• FuF•e• L•

IMPINGERS
VACUUM THERMOMETERS BYPASS

MAIN t• GUAGE VALVE VALVE

GAS \ METER /
VACUUM ORIFICE PUMP MANOMETER Figure '1=t, Method

5 Sampling

Train

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 7 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

Sample collection

procedures

began as soon as the probe was removed from the stack at the end of the sampling

period. The probe was allowed to cool so it could be safely handled,

all external

PM near the tip of the probe nozzle was wiped off, and a cap was placed over it to prevent

losing or gaining PM. The probe was removed

from the sample train, any silicone grease was wiped clean, and the open outlet of the probe was capped.

Care
was taken not to lose any condensate

that might be present.

The umbilical cord was removed

from the last impinger,

and the impinger

was closed off with Teflon®

tape. The selected

cleanup

area was clean and protected

from the wind so that the chances

of contaminating

or losing the sample was minimized. A portion of the acetone

used for cleanup was saved as a blank. A volume of 200 mL of this acetone

was directly taken from the wash bottle being used and placed in a glass sample container

labeled "acetone

blank." The samples

were recovered

as follows: Container No, 1. The filter was carefully

removed

from the filter holder and placed in its original identified

petri dish and sealed with Teflon(D

tape. A pair of tweezers

and/or clean disposable

surgical

gloves was used to handle the filter. Container No. 2. The recovered

PM or any condensate

from the probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder was collected by washing

these components

with acetone

and placing the wash in a glass container.

This container

was properly

labeled,

sealed with Teflon® tape, and the sample level was marked with a permanent

marker prior to transport

to the lab. Container No. 3. Using a top loaded balance,

the liquid that was in the first two impingers

was measured

to within 1 g. The weight was recorded

of liquid present.

This information

was required

to calculate

the moisture content of the effluent gas. Container No. 4. The color of the indicating

silica gel was noted to determine whether

it had been completely

spent, and a notation

of its condition was made. After taking its final weight, the silica gel was transferred from the fourth impinger

to its original container

and sealed. Reagents: The reagents

used in sampling

are as follows:

(1) Glass fiber filters, without organic binder, exhibiting

at least 99.95 percent

efficiency

(<0.05 percent

penetration)
on 0.3-micron

dioctyl phthalate

smoke particles.

The filter efficiency

test is conducted in accordance

with ASTM Method

D 2986-71.

(2) Silica Gel, Indicating

type, 6- to 16- mesh. If it has been previously

used, it is dried at 175°C (350°F) for 2 hours.

Since analysis of the material

caught in the impingers

is required,

(3) deionized

distilled water was used. Analysis

of deionized

water is run prior to field use to eliminate

a high blank on test samples.

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 8 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT EPA Method

320: "Deterrninat|or•

of Gaseous

Compounds

by F.xtractive Fourier Transform

Infrared

(FT|R) Spectroscopy" This method

applies to the analysis

of vapor phase organic or inorganic compounds that absorb energy in the mid-infrared

spectral

region, from about 400 to 4500 cm-1 (25to 2.5 IJm). These methods

were used to determine compound-specific

concentrations

in a multi-component

vapor phase sample,

which is contained

in a closed-path

gas cell. Spectra

of samples were collected

using a measured

background

or Io spectrum

and a stack spectrum,

not necessarily

collected

at the same time. These are used to generate

the absorbance

that is analyzed

for gas identifications

and concentrations. Sampling System A gas sample was continuously

extracted

from the source with a heated probe and filter heated to 185°C and channeled

through

100 feet of heated 3/8-inch O.D. Teflon®

sample line. The quartz filter and sampling

system
was conditioned

with gas sample for 19 hours prior to sampling.

This line temperature was maintained

at a constant

temperature

above 340 F. Digital temperature controllers

were used to control and monitor the temperature

of the transport

lines that were connected

to the instrument.

The sample was vacuumed through the cell by a sample pump on the exhaust of the cell. The pressure and temperature

of the instrument

were automatically

logged in the data set and averaged

over the same time period as the data. Analytica| System

and Procedures The FTIR system consisted

of a source of infrared

radiation

which was an electrically heated ceramic

element,

an interferometer

which modulates

the IR signal, a heated sample cell of known pathlength

through which the gas sample was passed,

an infrared

detector

for sensitive

detection

of the infrared energy passed by the cell, and miscellaneous

optical elements

(flat and focusing

mirrors)

that transfer

the infrared

radiation

between

system components. The nominal

spectral

resolution

of the system was one half
wave number

(0.5 cm-1 ).

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 9 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

Environics Model # S-4020 (Mass Flow Controller)

3-Way Ball Valve (•

System Computer

Exhaust to Atmosphere Or return t.•process

Rotameter 0-25 LPM

Figure 1-2 Schematic

of RMFTIR

System

78 Meter (Schematic for 10 Meter is similar)

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD •10 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT Pre•Test Procedures
Performance of instrument

and Checks
Cell Leakage

A leak check was performed

on both the sample system and the cell prior to any testing.

For the vacuum

test, the cell was pumped

to as lowest obtainable pressure

and sealed;

the pressure

rise was measured

following

2 minutes. System Leakage

A leak check from the probe tip to cell outlet was performed

by connecting a 0 to 25-L/min

rotameter

to the outlet of the cell. The inlet to the probe
was closed off, a vacuum

of 26 inches mercury

was pulled until the rotameter

float reached zero and maintained

a vacuum

for two minutes,

If any leak was identified

it
was corrected

and the test repeated. Background -Nitrogen

(N2) or zero air were passed

through

the system and internal compartment

to minimize

ambient

effects.
Path length

Determination Freon-22

was passed

through

the cell and analyzed against reference

standard

spectra using integrated

areas to determine

the operating path length of the FTIR unit. This analysis

can be found in the appendices. CTS evaluations

are contained

in calibration

data. Analyte Spiking

Analyte

spiking was performed

on April 11, 2006. Results of the spiking are contained

in Appendix

G, Laboratory

Data. Spiking was performed using hydrogen

chloride

in accordance

with EPA 320 for surrogate

spiking procedures. Surrogate

spiking was used because

the expected

stack concentrations differed from expected

values. Calibration

transfer standards

were performed

to validate the use of hydrogen

chloride as a surrogate

for hydrogen

fluoride. Surrogate Analyte spiking was conducted

with surrogate

compound

to verify that the sampling system could transport

the analytes

from the probe to the FTIR system. The surrogate

compound

used in a QA spike procedure

was representative

in chemical and physical

properties

to the target of interest.

Under certain conditions the use of the surrogate

spike results can be representative

for analytes that are more reactive,

more soluble, have a lower absorptivity,

or have
a lower vapor pressure

than the surrogate

itself. Spiking Procedure QA spiking was used as a calibration

procedure

before testing.

QA spiking involves at least three spiked samples.

The analyte concentrations

in the spiked sample were compared

to the expected

spike concentration

to verify that the sampling/analytical system was working

properly.

When QA spiking is used, the method has already been validated

at a similar source for the analyte in question. The QA spike demonstrates

that the validated

sampling/analytical

conditions

are being duplicated.

If the QA spike fails then the sampling/analytical

system is
GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD '•1 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT repaired and respiked

before testing proceeds.

The spike/tracer

gas was introduced at a constant

flow rate of f3 10 percent of the total sample flow, as near possible.

The use of a rotameter

at the end of the sampling

train to estimate the required

spike/tracer

gas flow rate was utilized.

The use of the Environics $4020 SN3437

mass flow meter (4- 2 percent)

was utilized to monitor the spike flow rate.
Performance Parar•eters

Measure System

Noise Equivalent

Absorbance

(NEA) System noise was determined

by measuring

two successive

single beam spectra at minimal

integration

time (15 seconds)

while the cell was purged with pure zero air or N2. The short integration

time was to assure that there
were no changes

in the sample or system purge during measurements.

The absorbance spectrum,

which resulted

from using one of the single beams as background to the other, contained

predominantly

system noise since the spectral features

mostly cancelled

each other. Noise was then determined

by measuring the peak-to-peak

and RMS absorbance

at the wavelength

regions used for target compound

analysis.

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING.

LTD "12 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

The testing location

on the kiln stack consisted

of two, 3-inch diameter

ports on a 46.125-inch

x 47.25-inch diameter

elliptical

stack. The sample port was positioned

a distance

of 20-ft. upstream and 25-ft. downstream

from the nearest disturbances.

This meets the requirements

established

in the Code of Federal

Regulations

for sample locations.

Traversing

was performed

at the sample points identified

below in Figure 1-2.

2 5 -ft Sampling Ports CROSS SECTION

2 0 -ft

TRAVERSE

POINTS:

20 NUMBER OF PORTS:

2 POINTS/PORT: 10 STACK ID:E=46.125/S=47.25

in PORT LENGTH:

13.0 in. TRAVERSE DISTANCE

FROM INSIDE WALL, in. POINT NO.

East Port

South Port
2345678910 14.2

13,7 16.8 16.4 19.7 19.5 23.4 23.3 28.8 28.8 43.4 43.5 48.7 49,5 52.4 53.3 55.3 56.3 57.9 59.0

Figure 1-3: Diagram

of kiln stack sampling

location

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD t3 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT The testing location

on the DLA inlet consisted

of two pods, one on the top being 2-inches

in diameter and one on the side being 4-inches

in diameter,

on a 66.5-inch

x 64.3-inch

diameter elliptical stack. The sample port was positioned

a distance

of 25-ft. from ground leVel: This meets the requiremer•ts

established

in the Code of Federal Regulations

for sample locations.

Traversing
was performed

at the sample points identified

below in Figure 1-2.

CROSS SECTION

25-ft elevation;_ TRAVERSE

POINTS:

24 NUMBER OF PORTS:

2 POINTS/PORT: 12 STACK ID: S= 64.30/T=66.5

in. PORT LENGTH:

S=4/T=2

in.
TRAVERSE POINT NO.
123456789101112 DISTANCE

FROM INSIDE WALL, in.
Side Port

Too Port 8.5 11.2 14.2 17.7 22.128.3 45.4 51.7 56.0 59.362.5 65.3 6.59.2 12.215.7 20.126.3 43.4 49.7 54.0 57.5 60.5 63.3 Sampling Locations

Figure 1=4: Diagram

of DLA inlet sampling

location

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD '•4 DEER PARK. TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

The following

calculations

were used in the emission

test program

for the kiln outlet stack. The values below represent

the actual measured

data from Run 1 performed

on April 12, 2006.
Caicu|ations

Stack Gas Flow Rate

Absolute Stack Gas Pressure

(Ps) tgslalic P•. Pbar +--13.6 Where: Pbar Barometric

pressure Pstatic Static pressure

of stack gas (in.)
29.94 in. Hg

Gas Volume

Sampled

at Standard

Conditions

Where: Vm Actual gas volume sampled Y Gas meter correction

factor Pbar Measured

Barometric

Pressure Z•H Differential

Pressure

across meter orifice Trn Meter temperature

at standard

conditions
46.545 dscf

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD "15 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT Water Vapor Collected

at Standard

Conditions

(Vwstd)

Vwste 0.04707xV•c Where: Vic Liquid volume collected

in impingers (imp 1-3 mL + imp 4 mg) Vwst_.__d = 5. 62 •

Measured Stack Gas Moisture

Content Vwstd Bws =(Vwstd+Vmstd

)
B.__•= 10.77 % Dry Molecular

Weight

of Stack Gas (Md)

M e 0144(%C02

) + 0.32(%02

) + 0.28(100

%C0•

%02 ) M_.._d = 29.14 Ib/Ib-Mole

Wet Molecular

Weight

of Stack Gas

27.94 Ib/Ib-Mole

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD •6 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT Stack Gas Velocity

Where: C• Pitot Coefficient

(0. 84) Ts Stack Temperature

(°R) Ps Absolute

Stack gas Pressure Ms Molecular

weight of Stack gas (wet basis)

44.2 fps

Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual

cubic feet per, wet basis)

Where: Qs Volumetric

flow rate (acfm) Ps Absolute

Stack gas Pressure Ts Stack Temperature

(OR)
C•stdw -• 33,012 acfm Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard

Conditions,

dry basis)
Q•"• \29.92)

(Q' (T.,.)

Where: Qs Volumetric

flow rate (dscfm) Ps Absolute

Stack gas Pressure Ts Stack Temperature

(OR) B•,s Stack moisture

content Q•std = 20,137 dscfm

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD '•7 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

( Cgas, ppb I( lb/lb-moleweight C•.s,•b/sc•,db \ 1-• J• 385.26 × 10-6 ft / lb mole

Where: Cgas, •/sc•, •,b Concentration

of compound

Iblscf (dry basis) Compound Emission

Rates Elb/,•r Cs,lb/scf cl b x Qstd,s•
Eb_•HF = 1.41 Ib/hr

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 18 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

Plant ACME BRICK Location .Kiln Stack

Address

Sealy, Texas Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV

Job # ABSE100

Date Start

C•Y

AHV.,

Vwstd % HzO % HzOsat if el%CO2 %O•% CO+ N FoMdPgPs

A•

%1 Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature,

°F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature,

% Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature,

°F Average Velocity Head, inches of Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 4/12/2006

4/12/2006

4112/2006 9:13 11:38

13:58 11:11 12:54

15:10 24 24

24 60 60

60 0,297 0,297

0.297 0.84 0.84

0.84 0.996 0,996

0.996 29.97 29.97

29.97 2.13 2.22

2.20 47,314 49.192

49.802 78.28 82.05

86.65 46,545 48,066

48.249 119.4 125.7

129.1 5.62 5.92

6.08 10.77 10.96

11.19 100,0 100.0

100.0 0.892 0.890

0.888 3.00 3,50

3.50 ,16.50 16.50

16.50 80.5 80.0

80.0 1.47 1.26

1.26 29.14 29.22

29.22 27.94 27.99

27.96, -0.46 -0.46

-0.46 29,94 29.94

29,94 312.8 308.5

310.(• 0.411 0,429

0.423

Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg Particulate Concentration,

grains/dscf WCgr/dscf EIb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr HCI ppmw Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmw HCIppmd Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmd HCl Ibs/hr Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr HF ppmw Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmw HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmd HF Ibs/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 44.2

45.1

44.8 12,436 12.436

12.431 20,137 20,598

20,372 33,012 33,653

33,431 99.6 100.5

102J 29.35 40.65

39.10 0.0097 0.0131

0.0125 Average

6C 0.297 0.84C 0.996 29.97 2.18 48.769 82.3: 47.620 124.;5.87 10.97 100.0 0.890 3.333 16.50 80.2 1.33 29.19 27.97 -0.46 29.936 310.4 0.421 44.7 12.436 20,369 33,365 100.7 36.37 0.0118 2.18 2,04 2.30

2.11 11.28 8.40

10.04

9.91 12.64 9.43

11.30

11.13 1.45 1.10

1.31

1.29 20.03 21.49

25.62

22.38 22.45 24.14

28.85

25.14 1.41 1.55

1.83

1.60 Table 1=3. Summary

Table of Compliance

Testing

Kiln Stack

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD '•9 DEER PARK, TXAIR QUALITY TEST REPORT

Plant ACME BRICK Location DLA Inlet

Address

Texas Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV

Date Start

OCpYPB•V•.t•Vmsld VieVwstd % HzO Mfd%CO• %02% CO+ N• MaMsPgPst,APavg VsAsOaw Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature,

°F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature,

°F Average Velocity Head, inches of H20 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

4/12/2006

4/12/2006

411212006 9:10 11:35

14:00 10:21 12:35

15:00 24 24

24 60 60

60 66 0.84 0.84

0,84 0.84 0,981 0.981

0.981 0.981 29.97 29.97

29.97 29.97 1.50 1.50

1.50 1.50 39.297 40.053

41.353 40.234 71.25 79.60

81.67 77.47 38.520 38.660

39.756 38.979 108.8 101.6

103.8 104.7 5.12 4.78

4.89 4.93 11.73 .11.01

10.94 11.23 0.883 0.890

0.891 0,888 4.00 3.50

4.00 3.833 .14.50 14.50

14.50 14.500 81,5 82.0

81.5 81.7 29.22 29.14

29.22 29.19 27.90 27.91

27.99 27,94 -0.61 -0.82

-0.78 •0.74 29.93 29.91

29.91 29.92 313.8 ,328.3

.326.7 322.94 0.179 0.182

0.156 0.182 29.2 29.8

30.1 29.7 19.147 19.147

19.147 19.147 20,643 20,419 34,546 34,113 16.70 18.81 2.18 183.35 206.62 13.14 20,211 20,402 •33,554 34,240 HCl ppmw

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmw 14.27

20.39

15.4• HCIppmd Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmd 16.17

22.91

17.3• HCI Ibs/hr

Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr 1.86

2.65

2.03 HF ppmw

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmw 203.72

169.66

176.66 HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmd 230.80

190.65

198.36 HF Ibs/hr

Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 14.53

12.12

12.76 Table 1-4. Summary

Table of Compliance

Testing

DLA Inlet

GOLDEN SPECIALTY

CONSULTING,

LTD 20 DEER PARK, TXTesting Equipment

Provided in Table 1-5 below is a list of all testing equipment

used in testing of the Kiln Stack. Equipment 80M Base Module 80M Cell Accessory 10M Base Module 10M Cell Accessory Gas Divider Mass Flow Heated Line Rotameter Rotameter Golden Specialty

Consulting

Trailer #6 Model B-ZDI24-C E-7800-C B-ZMI24-C E-1000-C S-4020 0-4 Lpm 100ft Custom sections 0-0.8325 Lpm 0-16.56 Lpm

Manufacturer IMACC IMACC IMACC IMACC Environics Dwyer Technical Heaters Dwyer Dwyer

Serial Number BOO2402E 78-E002903H BOO2903H EOO2602F 3437 G56275 N/A 0102100220448-A 0103050235197-A Sample Pump

01320T ADI 103083 Isokinetic train

010175 APEX 10175 Gas Meter

N/A

Millenium 2030

Table 1-5. Testing

Equipment

UsedScott B. Swiggard President/Technical Director
Professio.a| Experience

Summary Broad background

in environmental

compliance

and regulatory

issues. Has directed projects associated with air permitting,

groundwater

contamination,

air toxins emissions

control, hazardous

materials

control and reporting, wastewater

process control (metals removal),

energy conservation,

industrial

ventilation,

noise control, bioremediation,

and storm water control. Extensive background

in emission

testing, with over 1,300 tests personally

conducted

and/or supervised. Responsible for the continued

development

of testing capabilities

and their research

and development. Provides project management

for testing at assigned

client's facilities.

Provides

field support to the project managers on testing protocols

and methods. Responsible for verification

and validation

on test data as part of a Quality Assurance/Quality

Control Program. Work Experience Golden Specialty Consulting,

Ltd. (January

1997 Present) Golden Specialty Laboratory,

Ltd.. (April 2005 Present) Position: President/Technical

Director RAMCON Environmental

Corporation

(March 1995 -January

1997) Position: Gulf Coast Division Manager
ARKLATEX Environmental

Consultants,

Inc. (April 1992 February

1995) Position: Environmental

Engineer ALLOY Piping Products,

Inc. (September

1990 April 1992) Position: Industrial Engineer United States Air Force (June 1980 September

1990) Position: Quality Assurance

Inspector/Evaluator
Professional Affiliations Source Evaluation

Society (SES) and Air and Waste Management

Association

(AWMA) Source Testing Accreditation

Council (STAC)

Board Member Education Bachelor of Science in Industrial

Engineering,

Southern

Illinois University,

1991 Associate degree in Aviation Maintenance

Technology,

Community

College of the Air Force, 1990 Graduate of the United States Air Force Air University

in Management/Supervision, 1989 Licensed airframe and power plant mechanic FTIR 80 hour training course conducted

by Dr. Robert Spellicy, IMACC, Round Rock, Texas Source Sampling

and CEMS Workshop;

Walter Smith & Associates,

2003Karen L Swiggard Vice President/Quality

Assurance

Officer

Professional Work Sur•mary Broad background

in Safety, environmental

compliance

and regulatory

issues. Has managed

projects associated with Hazard Communication,

Blood borne pathogens,

Tuberculosis

Infection

Control, Respiratory Projection,

Personal

Protective

Equipment,

Life Safety Code, Fire Safety, Electrical

Safety, Back Injury Protection,

Workplace

Violence,

Employee

Injury and Illness Reporting,

Emergency

Response, Hazardous Drugs, Ventilation

and Indoor Air Quality, and Joint Commission

on Accreditation

of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)

............. Extensive background

in employee

Training in areas of: Hazard Communication,

Blood borne pathogens, Tuberculosis Infection Control• Respiratory

Projection,

Personal Protective

Equipment,

Fire Safety, Electrical Safety, Back Injury Prevention,

Emergency

Response,

and Computer

Ergonomics Developed and presented

intensive

training courses for Health and Safety professionals

at all NASA centers including: Occupational

Ergonomics

and Blood borne Pathogens. While working for Texas Water Commission

(now Texas Natural Resource

Conservation

Commission, TNRCC). She was responsible

for the enforcement

of RCRA program in Texas including the inspection

and evaluation of RCRA programs

at various chemical

plants and other facilities handling hazardous

waste. Was a key member for emergency

response

for chemical

spills and accidents. Managed environment

of care accreditation

process of Kelsey-Seybold,

Houston

Texas, for JCAHO in which it was awarded.
Work Experience Golden Specialty Consulting,

Ltd. (February

1999 Present) Position: Vice President Kelsey-Seybold Clinic (June 1995- February

1999) Position: Manager of Environmental

Health and Safety NASA-Johnson Space Center (April 1986- June 1995) Position: Health & Safety Training Specialist/Industrial

Hygienist Texas Water Commission

(February

1984- April 1986) Position: Environmental

Quality Specialist Professional Affiliations Source Evaluation

Society (SES) Air and Waste Management

Association

(AWMA) American Industrial

Hygiene Association

(AIHA) Education Bachelor of Science in Environmental

Science, University

of Houston,

1984 Source Sampling

and CEMS Workshop,

Walter Smith & Associates

2002Greg D. Burch,

QSTI Manager, Emissions

Testing

Professional Experience

Summary

® Responsible

for designing,

planning and managing

sampling

programs,

daily assignments

of field testing crews, sample analysis, data reduction,

QA/QC reviews, and reporting

activities. o Broad background

in environmental

compliance

and regulatory

issues. Extensive

experience

designing and managing

test programs

to meet federal, state and local compliance

demonstration

requirements. ® Participated

in or supervised

over 2,500 tests across twenty-three

states and Puerto Rico, including hazardous waste inc. trial burns, EPA Superfund

cleanup sites, and compliance

testing performed

as an agent for the South Coast Air Quality Management

District (SCAQMD).
® Sampling

experience

includes flow stream characterization

and monitoring

of a number of types of flow streams for engineering

purposes;

emissions

sampling

for regulatory

compliance

demonstration; emissions sampling

for systems audit requirements

of continuous

emission

monitoring

systems (CEMS) and predictive

emissions

monitoring

systems (PEMS).

• Assist clients in troubleshooting

and repairing

existing emissions

monitoring

systems,

or designing

and implementing new systems. Work Experience Golden Specialty Consulting,

Ltd. (April 2000 Present) Position: Manager,

Emissions

Testing ARI Environmental,

Inc. (May 1996- April 2000) Position: Project Manager RMT- Jones and Neuse, Inc. (May 1994 May 1996) Position: Program Director Tracer Technology

Division of Team, Inc. (May 1989 May 1994) Position: Staff Engineer United States Navy (March 1983 March 1989) Position: Avionics Repair Technician

Second Class / Work Center Supervisor Professional Affiliatio.s Source Evaluation

Society (SES) Air and Waste Management

Association

(AWMA) Professional Education Kingwood College, Kingwood,

TX, 4.0 GPA, Pres. Honor Roll, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society Southwest Missouri State Electronics

Vocational

Technical

School United States Navy Multiple Electronics

and Quality Assurance

Courses,

102 credit hours 40 Hour Hazwoper

Training 29 CFR 1910.120 Fundamentals of Instructor

Training

American

Red Cross Visible Emissions

Certified (EPA Method 9) Source Sampling

and CEMS Workshop,

Walter Smith & Associates,

2003 and 2004 Preparation for the SES QSTI Exam Workshop,

Walter Smith and Associates,

2005 SkilIPath® Seminars,

Project Management

Workshop,

2003Jeff Knapp,

QSTI Supervisor, Emissions

Testing

Pro•:essionai Experience

Sur•i•ary Performed emissions

testing and managed

projects for 12 years throughout

the United States utilizing California Air Resources

Board (CARB), South Coast Air Quality Management

District (SCAQMD),

Texas Air Control Board (TACB) and Environmental

Protection

Agency (EPA) methodologies. Performed over 400 compliance

tests using extractive

Fourier Transform

Infrared Spectroscopy. Additionally, was consulted

and provided

supporting

data for the development

of EPA Method 318 "Extractive FTIR Method for Measurement

of Emissions

from the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries." Performed on and/or managed

projects in El Salvador and Bolivia. Recovery team member for DESRET

Chemical

Depot demilitarization

em=ssions

trial burns. Work Experience Golden Specialty Consulting,

Ltd. (September

05 Present) Position: Supervisor,

Emissions

Testing
Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc. (September

1995 September

2005) Position: Field Testing Supervisor,

Project Manager Sierra Environmental

Engineering

(February

1994 September

1995) Position: Chemist United States Navy (February

1988 February

1994) Position: Nuclear Plant Operator,

Engineering

Laboratory

Technician
Professional Affiliatio.s,

Training,

and Certifications OSHA 40-Hour

HAZWOPR MSHA Houston Area Safety Council Louisiana Safety Council Certified Visible Emissions

Evaluator Source Evaluation

Society (SES) QSTI Education University of Southern

California,

Mechanical

Engineering Hampton University,

Nuclear Engineering United States NAVY, Nuclear Power School United States NAVY, Engineering

Laboratory

TechnicianPaula Metz Reports Coordinator

/ instrumentation

Technician

Professional Experier•ce

Summary Experience with EPA testing regulations,

including 40 CFR, Part 60 and Part 75. Experienced with TCEQ testing regulations,

including

30TACl15,

30TACl17, Procedures Manual. and TCEQ Sampling

CEM instrumentation

projects include continuous

analysis for carbon monoxide

(CO), total oxides of nitrogen (NO×), oxygen (O2), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Knowledgeable in all required regulations

and methodologies

for the testing and analysis of stack gas velocity and moisture

content analysis. Knowledgeable in the testing requirements

and procedures

for the testing and analysis of Predictive Emissions monitoring

systems (PEMS). Assists in report review and finished product.
Work Experience Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (February

2001 Present) Position: Instrumentation

Technician Educatior• Working on general education

to be credited to a BS Degree in Environmental

Science Visible Emissions

Certified

(EPA Method 9) 12 Hour Basic Instrumentation

Training, California

Analytical

Instruments,

January 2003 Source Sampling

and CEMS Workshop,

Walter Smith & Associates,

2002, 2003 and 2004 SkillPath® Seminars,

Employee

Management

and Supervision

Workshop,

2003Gordon L. Gossett Maintenance Coordinator

Professional Experience

Summary Responsible for coordinating/managing

maintenance

of all company

facilities, grounds,

vehicles,

trailers, labs, and environmental

equipment. Responsible for establishing

and maintaining

a quality control program to monitor key equipment

assets and establishing a preventative

maintenance

process. Responsible for designing

and building environmental

equipment

in-house and all equipment

and testing supply purchasing. 20+ years of Supervisory

experience

in construction

and maintenance. Experience in performing

maintenance

and calibrations

on a variety of air testing equipment. Experience with EPA testing regulations,

including 40 CFR, Part 60 and Part 75. CEM instrumentation

projects include continuous

analysis for carbon monoxide

(CO), total oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxygen (02), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Knowledgeable in methodologies

for the testing and analysis of stack gas velocity and moisture

content analysis. Knowledgeable in the testing requirements

and procedures

for the testing and analysis of Predictive Emissions monitoring

systems (PEMS) and Continuous

Emission

Monitoring

(CEMS). Partial Work Experience Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. (October 2003 Present) Position: Maintenance

Manager
Brown & Root-Shell

Chemical

Complex

(November

2002 October 2003) Position: Pipe Foreman Brown & Root-Exxon

Chemical

Facility (April 2001 October 2002) Position: General Foreman Encompass Industrial

Services-Dow

Chemical

Company,

Seadrift Operations

(October 2000 -April 2001) Position: Supervisor

of Maintenance Brown & Root-Union

Carbide Plant (April 1986-October

2000) Position: Supervisor,

Welding Department

(Shop & Field) Education Source Sampling

and CEMS Workshop;

Walter Smith & Associates,

2004 Skillpath Seminar,

January 2004 American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector,

April 1998 8-Hr Training in Welding and Quality Control for the Petro-Chem

Industry, November

1994 Certified Instructor

for The Construction

Education

Foundation,

July 1993 24-hr Training Course-Visual

Testing, April 1993 16-hr Training Course-Liquid

Penetrant

Testing, October 1991 24-hr Radiographic

Film Interpretation,

May 1990 Victoria College, 1973-1974H.Po Gas Products, inc. P.O. Box 2074 6701 West Bay Road Baytown, TX 77522-2074 Phone: (281)383-7236 Fax: (281)573-9267 Emalh Hpgasproduct@aol.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Customer Information: Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. 931 Seaco Court Deer Park, TX 77536 POO.#2006006 Mixture

Information: Cylinder #: SG9114519 Valve: 330 CGA Volume: 142 scf Pressure: 2000 psia Certified Gas Standard

For Instrument

Calibration

(+or- 2%) Component Requested

Concentration

Level

Reported

Concentration

Level (Mole %) (Mole %) Hydrogen Chloride 300 ppm 298 ppm Sulfur Hexafluoride 4 ppm 4 ppm Nitrogen Balance Balance

Shelf Life: 03 months Make Date: 02-14-06 Exp. Date:

05-13-06 Additional

Remarks:H.P. Gas Products• lnco P.O. Box 2074 6701 West Bay Road Baytown, TX 77522-2074 Phone: (281)383-7236 Fax: (281)573-9267 Email: Hpgasproduct@aol.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Customer Information: Golden Specialty

Consulting,

Ltd. 931 Seaco Court Deer Park, TX 77536 P.O.#2006006 Mixture

Information: Cylinder #: CC169777 Valve: 350 CGA Volume: 142 scf Pressure: 2000 psia Certified Gas Standard

For Instrument

Calibration

(+or- 2%) Component Requested

Concentration

Level

Reported

Concentration

Level (Mole %1 (Mole %) Ethylene 10 ppm 10 ppm Nitrogen Balance Balance

Shelf Life: Make Date: Exp. Date:

06 months 02-14-06 08-13-06

Additional

Remarks:PITOT TUBE INSPECTION

DATA SHEET PreF se.mpl e

Post Sample D•te•C) •

eve-l-? obstructions ? damaged? -I0° < •i < +I0° -I0 < • < +I0 -5 < •I < +5 _5 < • < +5
¥8A }.05 Dt < Pa < 1.5 Dt I.OS Dt < Pb < 1.5 D t 3/16"• Dt • 3/8" .A tan y < 0.125"
A tan .• < 0.0312,5" Pa Pb + 0.063"

Comments:

PltOt" tube/probe

number.

•_'[

meets or exceeds

all: specifications criteria and/or

appl, lcable design

features*

and is hereby

assigned

a pitot tube calibration

factor of 0.84.Signature

-•See 40 CFR 60, Vo). •Z, No. 160, Hethod ZL V'erify the m•nimum inch setbBc• Of •he ther•o¢ou:Ple

and Ihe minimum 3/a inch s•paration between •he pitot %ube and th• nozzle as sho•n at the top of th•s page. Date

•orm GSC TMOOaProbe Nozzl• I)i•rnet•}

Calibration

Q4-2005
Date Set12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005: Set12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 12/1/2005 Nozzle ID# AA1A2A3A4A5A6A7BB1B2B3B4B5B6B7

Nozzle Diameter,

Dn (inches) Dnl
0.112 0.176 0.238 0.273 0.297 0.338 0.502 0.114 0.177 0.237 0.272 0.371 0.423 0.494 Dn2
0.113 0.175 0.239• 0.275 0.299 0.339 0.501
0.114 0.176i 0.240 0.269 0.369 0.424 0.495

Dn3
0.111i 0.175 0.238 0.274 0.298 0.338 0.502 0.115 0.176 0.238 0.271

DnAvg
0.112 0.175 0.238 0.274 0.298 0.338 0.502 0.114 0.176 0.238i

Hi-Low
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001 0.003

Pass
YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
YesYesYes 0.271 0.003

Yes 0.371 0.370

0.002

Yes 0.424 0.424

0.001

Yes 0.001 0.494 0.494 Yes QA/QC Check: Each Diameter

measured

to +/-0.001

inches? High-Low < 0.004 inches?FileSource Pathlength

Determination _41 lc__ a)_ !,._s_P•

Facility

ACME Brick Kiln Stack, Sealy, TX Date 4/11/2006

Freon 22 Temperature Reference 1050-1200

cm-1 Temperature Standard 185 185 Pressure Reference 760 Pressure

Standard 754.3 Pathlength Reference 16.88 Concentration

Standard 10.4 Area Reference 8.119 Area Standard 3.555 Concentration Reference 10.9 Pathlength

Standard 7.80 Ethylene 800-1150

era-1 Temperature Reference 185 Temperature

Standard Pressure Reference 773 Pressure

Standard Pathlength Reference 6.23 Concentration

Standard Area Reference 30.509 Area Standard Concentration Reference 500 Pathlength

Standard
Carbon Monoxide Temperature Reference 185 Temperature

Standard Pressure Reference 760 Pressure

Standard Pathlength Reference 26 Concentration

Standard Area Reference 14.148 Area Standard Concentration Reference 225 Pathlength

StandardPathlength Determination File 411 call a.spa

Facility

ACME Brick Source Kiln Stack, Sealy, TX Date 4/11/2006 78m Freon 22 1050-1200

cm-1 Temperature Reference 185 Temperature

Standard 162.2 Pressure Reference 760 IPressure

Standard 784.2 Pathlength Reference 10.4 16.88 Concentration

Standard Area Reference 8.119 Area Standard 21.659 'Concentration Reference 10.9 Pathlength

Standard 43,46 Ethylene 800-1150

cm-1 Temperature Reference 185 Temperature

Standard Pressure Reference 773 Pressure

Standard Pathlength Reference 6.23 Concentration

Standard Area Reference 30.509 Area Standard Concentration Reference 500 Pathlength

Standard Carbon Monoxide Temperature Reference Pressure Reference Pathlength Reference Area Reference Concentration

Reference 185i Temperature

Standard 760 Pressure

Standard 26 Concentration

Standard 14.148 !Area Standard 225 Pathlength

StandardTue

Apt 11 t t :45:07

2006 (GMT-05:0O) Collection

time: Tue Apt tl 11:50:10

2006 (GI• 65-
4-3-
2-
10-1-
4000 3000 2000 1000 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Quant Results No quant

results

for

the

selected spectrum!

Expanded fingerprint

region

o(• 0.12-
0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

1200 1000 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Number of sample scans: 179 Number of background

scans: 179 Resolution: 0.500 Sample gain: 1.0 Mirror velocity:

1.8988 Aperture: 100.00 Detector: MCT/B Beamsplitter: ZnSe Source: IRWed

A )r "•2 00:t5:09

2006 (GMT=05:0O) Collection

time: Wed Apr 12 00:20:13

2006 (GI 6

-2

4000 3000 2000 1000 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Quant Results No quant

results

for

the

selecte(t spectrum!

Expanded fingerprint

region

0.6
0.5.0.40.3i

0.2
0.1

1200 1000 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Number of sample scans: 179 Number of background

scans: 179 Resolution: 0.500 Sample gain: 1.0 Mirror velocity:

1.8988 Aperture: 10.00 Detector: MCT/A Beamsplitter: ZnSe Source: IRC•

u• o • ••o o • Lu I- n o_ • 0Series 4020

System S/N 3437

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER

CALIBRATION

SHEET
MFC#: 1

Size: 10000 SCCM SERIAL NUMBER

682200002

This flow controller

was calibrated

using a Sierra Cal Bench "I'M, a NIST traceable

Primary Flow Standard Calibration System.

This calibration

was performed

with Nitrogen

at a standard

reference

temperature and pressure

of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance

data. This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.

Set Flow True Flow 5 %

500.0 CCM

528.400

CCM 10 %

1000.0

CCM

1062:433

CCM 20 %

2000.0

CCM

2121.767

CCM 30 %

3000.0

CCM

3160.850

CCM 40 %

4000.0

CCM

418&297

CCM 50 %

5000.0

CCM

5201:329

CCM 60 %

6000.0

CCM

6201.093

CCM 70 %

7000.0

CCM

7193.614

CCM 80 %

8000.0

CCM

8180,880

CCM 90 %

9000.0

CCM

9179.406

CCM 100 % 10000.0

CCM

10191.920

CCM

Computerized Gas Mixing/Dilution/Calibration Systems Envirenics inc. 69 Industrial

Park Road East eTolland,

CT 06084 (860) 872-1111

Fax (860) 870-9333 World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics.comSeries 4020

System S/N 3437

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER

CALIBRATION

SHEET
MFC#: 2

Size: 10000 SCCM SERIAL NUMBER

2357800001

This flow controller

was calibrated

using a Sierra Cal Bench TM, a NIST traceable

Primary Flow Standard Calibration System.

This calibration

was performed

with Nitrogen

at a standard

reference

temperature and pressure

of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance

data. This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.

Set Flow True Flow 5 %

500.0 CCM

484.946

CCM 10 %

1000.0

CCM

1003.851

CCM 20 %

2000.0

CCM

2032.041

CCM 30 %

3000.0

CCM

3049.599

CCM 40. %

4000.0

CCM

4062.055

CCM 50 %

5000.0

CCM

5066.571

CCM 60 %

6000.0

CCM

6075.607

CCM 70 %

7000.0

CCM

7085.042

CCM 80 %

8000.0

CCM

8099.648

CCM 90 %

9000,0

CCM

9131.232

CCM 100 % 10000.0

CCM

10188.685

CCM

Verified by: .._.•,._= Date:

Computerized Gas Mixing Systems Environics inc. 69 Industrial

Park Road East oTolland,

CT 06084 (860) 872-1111

Fax (860) 870-9333 World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@enwronics.comSeries 4020

System S/N 3437

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER

CALIBRATION

SHEET
MFC#: 3 Size: 1000 SCCM SERIAL NUMBER

2290000001

This flow controller

was calibrated

using a Sierra Cal Bench T•, a NIST traceable

Primary Flow Standard Calibration System.

This calibration

was performed

with Nitrogen

at a standard

reference

temperature and pressure

of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance

data. This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.

Set Flow True Flow 5 %

50.0 CCM

50.269 CCM 10 %

100.0 CCM

102.032

CCM 20 %

200.0 CCM

204.758

CCM 30 %

300.0 CCM

307.028

CCM 40 %

400.0 CCM

408.855

CCM 50 %

500.0 CCM

510.196

CCM 60 %

600.0 CCM

611.501

CCM 70 %

700.0 CCM

712.166

CCM 80 %

800.0 CCM

814.780

CCM 90 %

900.0 CCM

917.009

CCM 100 %

1000.0

CCM

1021.798

CCM

Date:

Computerized Gas Mixing Systems Environ|cs inc. 69 Industrial

Park Road East oTolland,

CT 06084 (860) 872-1111

Fax (860) 870-9333 World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics,comSeries 4020

System S/N 3437

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER

CALIBRATION

SHEET
MFC#: 4 Size: 100 SCCM SERIAL NUMBER

2278800001

This flow controller

was calibrated

using a Sierra Cal Bench TM, a NIST traceable

Primary Flow Standard Calibration System.

This calibration

was performed

with Nitrogen

at a.standard

reference

temperature and pressure

of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance

data. This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.

Set Flow True Flow 5 %

5.0 CCM 4.889 CCM 10 %

10.0 CCM

10.099 CCM 20 %

20.0 CCM

20.419 CCM 30 %

30.0 CCM

30.664 CCM 40 %

40.0 CCM

40.885

CCM 50 %

50.0 CCM

51.005 CCM 60 %

60.0 CCM

61.114 CCM 70 %

70.0 CCM

71.194 CCM 80 %

80.0 CCM

81.319

CCM 90 %

90.0 CCM

91.399 CCM 100 %

100.0 CCM

101.699

CCM

Verified y: Date:

Computerized Gas Mixing Systems 69 Industrial

Park Road East Tolland, CT 06084 (860) 872-1111

Fax (860) 870-9333 World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics.comClient/Plant Name City/State Test Location FIELD DATA SHEET 1 Sampling and Velocity Traverse

Points

Date/Time Personnel 9130/94:FDI-1

Distance-from Far Wall to Outside of Port Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness Stack/Duct (l)

Blue P•int

Measured Depth/Diameter (> 12 #l. ?) Width (if rectangular) Equiv. Diameter

(if rect.) D e 2 D W/(D + W}
Area (A) f> 113in. 2 ?) A rr Dz/4 or D W
Upstream l> 2 De?) Downstream (>

Distance

D

Rectangular Matrix Circle larger of two. No. Pts*

Pt,

.2345678 % Duct Depth

/2.2 Dist. from Inside Wall*

Dist. from Outside of

91011121314151617181920

Do not place closer to stack walls than: 1.0 in. for stack dia. > 24 in. 0.5 in. for stack dia. 12 to _<24 in.

Sketch of Location:"

In the space above, sketch a flow diagram of the test location; show the distance from the ports to flow disturbances

before and •,,•,.-•+-•- .•.•,,e•'o*•h ,h• •,•.•r'•ee-•'=•'fi•n=l.•..,•,.•..,.•roa;

show .<amplinno •--nnrt- locations.

In horizontal

ducts, check for dust buildups and measure or estimate the de•,•. QA/QC Check / /

•"
Checked by:

•-•

/ / Person•.•l•atur•/Date) Specifications

•?Reasonablene•/•

er (Signature/Date)FIELD DATA SHEE-• 2 Velocity" Head, Temperature,

and Stack Pressure

Measurements ClienVPlant Name City/State •<Av
Test Location/Run 9/30/94:

Job#

Personnel

FD2-1

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned paraflel to the stack or duct axis.

Pitot Tube ID # PitotTube Coefficient

(Cp) Ap Gauge Sensitivity Barometric Pressure

(Pb) (in. Hg) Test Location Elevation

Difference from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) Corr Pb Pb 0.001 B

(in. Hg) o.Sy O

(•') Piezometer

•,"'Type

S Static-Pressure (Pq)

(in. H20) Post-test Leak Check:

Side Pressure Tap Ap

(in. H20) Stable for 15 seconds?

(yes no) Pitot Tube Condition: Damaged? •" Post-test Intercomponent

Spacing: Level/Zero

Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk
Start Time: Pt. Ap # in. H•O

°F # Velocity Traverses I0 Finish Time: /0•0 Temp. Pt. Ap Temp. in, H20

°F

Average:

QNQC Check Completeness Checked by: •Legibility

•ccura

cy __•Jss

pecificatio

ns ••Reasonableness__

J Pers°•ature/Date) •a

m •ader (Sign ature/Date)Facility:

/@,• Location: West Term: Page / •)f /i Method

Test No: / Date: 9-ioZ-- o&

// Source Test Data Sheet

Pre-test t1. Port change Port change•_•_•

cfm @ Post Test @,Og(.)

cfm @ iO, O Init.• Pitot Leak Checl•: Pre

PRETEST DATA: P Bar: Sample Time P static • Ambient F Pitot Factor K3 Factor

Stack Diagram Meter No. Meter Factor Filter No. Filter Tare CalH@ Probe Nozzle • Grams/mL Impinger No.

Post Pre Net 1. _.•._•_•_l.nL_•,,•.•

.•,

3. •'t'm•

69.,S'.1 4.-•--m• •--•--- gT• X• 5. mL MOLE Bws

Point Layout Test SummalT: Notes:

Stm't Time: O •,] (,• Stop Time:

Point Meter Conditions

AP

Meter Volume

z • STq. 7o
IS Stack Probe

Temperatm-e

Oven Imp.Out

Meter Out

7o-7/ Vac.

•,0

•.o

•-0FIELD DATA SHEET 2. Velocity' Head, Temperature,

and Stack Pressure Measurements Client/Plant Name A • City/State "f'•'k

•
Test Location/Run

# .'•. Job#
Date Persorinel __•/•

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned parallel to the stack or duct axis. 9/30/94;

FD2-1

Pitot Tube ID # PitotTube Coeffi.cient

(C•) Ap Gauge Sensitivity Barometric Pressure

(P•) (in. Hg) Test Location Elevation

Difference [from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) Corr Pb Pb 0.001 B

(in. Hg) o.oS

(•) Piezometer

•/' Type S (in. H20) Static. Pressure

(Pq) Post-test Leak Check:

Side Pressure Tap Ap

(in. H20) Stable for 15 seconds?

(yes no) Pitot Tube Condition: Damaged? ,/k/ Post-test Intercomponent

Spacing:

A B

Level/Zero

Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk (' Velocity Traverses Start Time:

•"

Finish Time: Pt. Ap Temp.

Pt. Ap Temp. # in. H20

F # in. H20

F s/ o.tt

•

7/ o./•

30#

a 0_•

300

3 0.I•

33•

.8 •

333

8 ,•2

•Y2_

/o o.• 2 3 3I

lo 0.• •. 3Y6

Average:

c.,c. /, / Completeness •

Legibility"

.//Accuracy•Specific.•ations •/•easonableness Perso••re/pate) 2a• L•r (Signature/Date)Facility:

/t•,• Location: Test Term: .£/) Page / of /' Method

__• Source Test Data Sheet

Test No: • Dat•: •/•/•_- o•

Pre-test 0,00,<•

ofm @ •Init.

_• Port change.

cfm @ __u Init.-- Port change_

cfm @

Init. • Post Test •.ffj• cfm @ #,•,-•.•-• Init. • Pitot Leak Check: Pre a•----•st•

PRETEST DATA: P Bar: • ?/ Sample Time __•__ P static

O- • • Ambient F 7y Pitot Factor O o•] K3 Factor Grams/mL y. ost Pre Net

o•.CO• 3. _5___ MOLE Bws

Stack DiagTam •

Layout

Test Smmnary:

Start Time: /• 2•" Stop Time: Notes:••x•• •//•-•(•

Point Timeli 'O

1.23o /•

Meter Conditions

Meter AP •/AP

AH

Volume

Stack Probe

Temperatm'e

Oven Imp.Outq2

50.5-o

Meter om78

fro Vac.

Z, 02.0

2.0Client/Plant Name City/State •4,•/•/

Test Location/Run

# ,_• FIELD DATA SHEET 2 Velocity Head, Temperature,

and Stack Pressure Measurements ZK•F,*J. •

Job#

Personoel Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned parallel to the stack or duct axis. 9/30/94;

FD2-1

Pitot Tube ID # Pitot Tube Coefficient

(Cp) Ap Gauge Sensitivity Barometric Pressure

(Pb) (in. Hg) Test Location Elevation

Difference from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) .C °rr Pb Pb 0.001 B

(in. Hg) (¢') Piezometer

J Type S Static-Pressure (P•)

(in. H20) Post-test Leak Check:

Side Pressure Tap Ap

(in. H20 Stable for 15 seconds?

(yes no) Pitot Tube Condition: Damaged? Post-test Intercomponent

Spacing: Level/Zero

Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk...( Velocity Traverses Start Time: Finish Time: Pt. Ap Temp.

Pt. Ap Temp. # in. H20

°F # in. H20

°F .•/ o.o•

,•o# /7 o.//

2 •2•

3•Y

2 o.• Y 3 3J

Average:

Completeness Legibility uracy Checked by: ••...••
Personnel

(,_•g"•ature/Date) / Te#Leader

(Signature/Date)Facility:

1•_ ¢lc' Location:••. Test Team•" Pa•e ---Z-_ of Test No. • Inil.IniLIniL • PRETEST DATA: P Bar.: •5', • Sample Time 6 P static Ambient F Pitot Factor K3 Factor Meter No. • • Meter Factor •

Impingcr No.

Post Pre Filter No. 2..•g_mL

/•o

7• Filter Tare 3. mE

• •6g_•_.•

No•¢ To• g•

Set co; • Mole. Bws.

Stack Diagram Test Sthnmary: Notes:

Point Layout

Start Time:/•21•

Stop Time:

Meter Conditiom

Meter •AP AH

Volume •ni•Vol.mo • I.S C,•/, 70

#.• • •,<•'6•
1• DT•GO
X• 6•6. •S Temperature d# Imp. Meter•,, •' Meter

Va•. Stack Probe Oven Out •I•

OutClient/Plant Name City/State •C_ •<c•47,, i Zest Location

/•', •/• J•,•-•.,../,•.

FIELD DATA SHEET 1 Sampling and Velocity Traverse Points Job # •'•y//l• / ,,]

Personnel

Port I.D, Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness Stack/Duct (/)

Blue Print Depth/Diameter (> 12 [n. ?) Width (if rectangular) Equiv. Diameter

(if rect.} D o 2DW/(D

+ W)
Area (A} (> 113in. 2 ?) A rfDz/4orDW
Upstream (•2 De?)
Downstream (• 0.

Measured

No. Pts* Distance D

Rectangulsr Matrix Pt, 9130194:FDI-1

Date/Time

% Duct Dist. from

Dist. from Depth Inside Wall

Outside of Port

13
* Circ/e larger of two. /• `)"

14

•¢:: ..... i'"

-\ \,,.

20 •'• DO not •ace closer to stack wais than:

• O•fi,• m ].0 •n. for stack dia. >24

Sketch of Location:"

In the space above, sketch a flow diagram of the test location; show the distance from the ports to disturbances before, and •,,•*•e,-. ql•,•÷,-h .h• ornee-•n•.tinn•l

arP.•: .show samDlin(3

eort locations.

In horizontal

ducts, IIOWcheck for dust buildups and measure or estimate the depth. Completeness gibilit uracy Checked by:

Persoi•l-el•

S{• nat ure/Date)

••S

pecifications

•Reasonableness
T/•ar• Lea)•( (Signature/OatFacility:•£,•t'• E Location:• Test Term: Page __•L Method Unit: Test No Date: • Source Test Data Sheet

Pre-test ,.'0.g0•

cfm@•

Init. •-•
Port change

cfm @__

INt.__ Port change__

cfm @__

INt. Post Test •-

cf•@ _L(•_•l•i Init. • Pitot Leak Check: Pre • Post •

PRETEST DATA: PBar: Sample Time P static •-CI. •- Ambient F •I Pitot Factor K3 Factor

•3

Meter No.. Meter Factor Filter No. O Filter Tare Cal H@ \. Probe Nozzle .•. Grams/mL Impinger No.

Post ,,pre o

5. mL Net

o, Ih,5 CO•_•__•__ MOLE Bws

Stack Diagnam

Point

q

•o Point Layout

Test Smmnary:

Start Time: Notes: • rig ,n•

Meter Conditions
Time AP

•/&P

Meter AH

Stack Probe Volmne Stop Time:

Temperature

Oven Imp. Meter In Meter Vac. Out Out D•'!. D £3

13 7• I.o

aql • 7• q3 •,o 915 •s ¢o fl• LOLocation: "rest

term: Page Method

--• Source Test Data Sheet

Test No Date: Pre-test 0. C• % % Port change____ Port change Post Test • Pitot Leak Check: cfxn @

Init. j, cfm @ • Init.,• Pre/)j£ •ost

P Bar: %'1.3 l Sample Time _1• P static Ambient F Pitot Factor Q K3 Factor •.

Meter No..2•10 Meter Factor Filter No. ,5"• Filter Tare C•H• •.•3 Probe Nozzle •- 5 Grams/mL Impinger No.

Post, Pre

5. mL 6. • Net

co.MOLE Bws

Stack Diagnam

Point Layout

Test Smmna,ry: Notes: •9 q •. •.• 00• Start Time:

Time:

Point Time

t.

ll•

Meter Conditions

Meter AP •/AP

AH

Volmne

o.• •..•

•,.%0 Temperatm'e
Meter Imp. Meter In

Vac. Stack Probe Oven

Out

Out

•o• • •3 b• qi • 05Location'i• Test

Team: ¢L'•-•, M•,• Test No.._• Date: •-t• -o4 Page._(./ of ['

PRETEST DATA: P Bar.:•2•__. Sample Time P static

OAmbient F• Pitot Factor •-.•__•,• K3 Factor •;, Meter No. • Meter Factor Filter No. Filter Tare • Cal. H@ • Probe •

Stack Diagram

Point Layout Test St•nmary:

..,S•-t Time:

Stop Time:

Meter Conditions
Point Time

AP "4AP AH Ni•i!i •ii mi• Voi•mo '9,• i•

t•.•5

0,.3

Avg. Temperature

Imp. Meter Meter

Vae. Stack Probe Oven Out ha Out Meter VolumeFIELD DATA SHEET 2 Velocity Head, Temperature,

and Stack Pressure

Measurements Client/Plant Name

•/• Job#

Test Location/Run

# Personnel 9/30/94:FD2-1

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned paraflel to the stack or duct axis.

Pitot Tube ID # PitotTube Coefficient

(C)_.•__•• Ap Gauge Sensitivity Barometric Pressure

(Pb). (in. Hg) Test Location Elevation

Difference from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) Corr Pb Pb 0+001 B

(in. Hg) (,/) Piezometer

./j Type S Static. F•ressure

(Pq)

(in. H•O)

0, •: 7 Post-test Leak Check:

Side A Pressure Tap Ap

(in. H=O) Stable for 15 seconds?

(yes no) J/' Pitot Tube Condition: Damaged? Post-test Intercomponent

Spacing: Level/Zero

Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk__• Velocity Traverses Start Time: Finish Time:Ap

Temp. in. H20

°F

OA/QC Check Completeness

Legibility

•

Accuracy__ Checked by:

Personnel

(signature/Date) •icificati•ns

_LZ/Reasonableness 7<•/••/ea

m Lead er (Sig n atu •/"////•/// re/Date)Summary Table Compliance Testing
Plant Location ACME BRICK Kiln Stack

Address

Sealy, Texas Personnel GB• JK• GG• MB• GV Job # ABSE100

Date Start

@DNC.YPBr Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average orifice meter Differential,

inches H20 VtmVmstd VIcVwstd % HzO % HzOsat ifd%CO2 %02 % CO+ N2 FoMd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature,

°F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature,

%

4/12/2006

4/12/2006

4/12/2006 9:13 11:38

13:58 11:11 12:54

15:10 24 24

24 60 60

60 0.297 0.297

0.297 0.84 0.84

0.84 0.996 0.996

0.996 29.97 29.97

29.97 2.13 2.22

2.20 49,802 86.6• 48.249 129.1 6.08 11.19 100.(

iPgPs Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Moie Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 47.314

49.192 78.28 82.05 46.545 48.066 119.4 125.7 5.62 5.92 10.77 10.96 100.0 100.0

APavg VsA•QsdOaw%1Cgr/dscf EIb/hr HCI ppmw HCIppmd HCI Ibs/hr HF ppmw HFppmd HF Ibs/hr

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature,

°F Average Velocity Head, inches of H20 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg Particulate Concentration,

grains/dscf Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmw Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmd Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmw Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 0.892

0.890

0.888 3.00 3.50

3.50 t6.50 16.50

16.50 80,5 80.0

80.0 1.47 1.26

1.26 29.14 29.22

29.22 27.94 27.99

27.96 -0.46 -0.46

-0.46 29.94 29.94

29,94 312.8 308.5

310.0 0.411 0.429

0.423 44.2 45.1

44,8 12,436 12.436

12.43( 20,137 20,598

20,372 33,012 33,653

33,431 99.6 100.5

102.0 29.35 40.65

39.10 0.0097 0.0131

0.0125 1.68 2.30

2.18 11.28 8.40

10,04 12.64 9.43

11.30 1.45 1.10

1.3t 20.03 21.49

25.62 22.45 24.14

28.85 1.41 1.55

1.83 Average

60 0.297 0.840 0.996 29.97 2.18 48.769 82•33 47.620 124.7 5.87 i0•97 100.0 0.890 3,33." 16;50 80.2 1.33 29.19 27.97 -0.46 29.936 310•4 0.421 44.7 12.436 20,369 33,365 100,7 36.37 0.01182.06 9.91 11.13 1.29 22.38 25.14 1.60Plant

Acme Brick Address Sealy, TX Method

1 & 2 Data Sheet
Time

Date

04.2,0°

Fb"A SE100

29.56 I% moisture 6.0 Ms

28.32 %Oz

17.2, -12.2 Fo

2.06 Location Kiln A Outlet

PBr in"Hg Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV P static in HzO Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port, inches Width (if Rectangular) Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness,

inches Diameter, inches Equivanlent Diameter (only when rectangular) Area in square feet 60.250
t2.5 47.75
12.44 Straight Distance before sampling location, inches Number of Diameters

Before Location* Straight Distance after sampling location, inches Number of Diameters After Location* Enter "P" for Particulates

or "V" for velocity Minimum Number of Total Points Number of Total Points Chosen OK Number of Ports OK Number of Points per Port OK

Draw sampling location, plan & top view. 240.0 5.0 300.0 6.3P2024210 Distance

Stack Yaw & Velocity Data % Duct from Outside

Yaw Angle z•]P Temp Velocity Points Depth

of Port

Degrees

inch HzO °F FeetJsec A1 2.6%

13.74

0 0.43 313 45.4 • .8..;.•/•

•.•.,.•;z.

• .o.• •.•.• •.•.:• A3 14.6%

t9.47

0 0.50 316 49.1 • •.:.s..•,/•

•.•.•.9.

• •:.•! •.• • A5 34.2%

28.83

0 0.53 317 50.6 • .s.•'(•

•.•.•.•.

• • •.:•.•: •.•:• A7 77.4%

49.46

0.460 317 47.1 A8 85.4%

53.28

0.440 317 46.1 • •.•.:•'•

•.•.,.;•

•.:•.• •!.• •.• •!..• •.•.o•

•..9.•.•

•.•.• •.•.• •.•.:•. •.• ..z.:.s..°('•.

•.•Z•.

•.:•..• •J..• •.•..:• B2 8.2%

16.42

0.430 315 45.5 .1•.• !.•.#.."•

!..•,.•Z •.•. •.:• •.•.:• E•.•: •.•

;•.,.• •.• •.:• •.2..:• B.• :•.•,/.•

•.•:• •.• •.:• • .B.. s. •.:•

•.,.•:•. •.:•. •.:• •..:• .B..7. "• "•.: •:•(o. •,.•6. •.:4. •..1.• •!.:{•. •.• •.: •.(• •,.•

•.• •.•.• •. •.:• •..9. •.:•'•

•.,.;•3 •.• •.•.o. •.•.• •.•.•. •(.•,•

•,.(• .0..• •..o.• •.•.:.6..

Average 0.0 0.423 313,3 45.09
dscfm 20,676

Checked By:

•Per•

(Signature/Date)

Accuracy •

QA/QC C eck ./ • •
Vea•"•der (Signature/Date)•

•Particulate Data

Plant ACME BRICK Address Sealy, Texas Location Kiln Stack Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV % Moisture

10.8 Par "Hg

29.97 H=O -0•46 K 8.13 Filter #__ GSC0022 F/Iter Wt.
Traver- Elapsed -rime

Clock

DGM Point in Minutes

Time

Roadin,• No, Begin End 24hr

f1 A1 0.0 3.0 9:13:00 AM 645.344 •.• •.:0. •.• _9.;.!•.;.•.o...A.•

•.4"•.! A...• r,.:• •.:? •'_..•.•!.•..,•.•

•.•.

IRun No._ Equipment ID IReag.

Date

liS•te 4•[200s

Job# Job#ABSE100 Constants Pre Mid Post 12.44 Vacuum (in. Hg) 16

16 ISarnp.

A IUmbicaf lO0fl Meter box 01112]06 Y

DGM Meas Stack TC

TC

01/12/06 &•l•

1.806 Final DGM Meier 10175 Pitot

01/12/01 Cp

Leak

0.002

0.007 Orsat Pump NA Nozzle

01/12]0• ON

0.297 Pitot

Good X Good Est. Moisture

22.2: gm H•O 119.4 rVI3A 3.0 %coz •lozzle

Good X Good •alura(adB 100.C' FO= 1.46667

rVIs 27.94• L Md 29.14 Velocity Stack DGM IOrlficeP

Probe Box Filter Imping. Pump Temp. Temp. IAH in H,O

Temp. Temp. Outlet Temp. Vac.

Notes

31= 71 2.10 2.10 •'"'"'i •'"'"'""i'"'"'"'•'"'""!'"'"'"•"'"'"'i''"'"]':'•'"'""
• 314 71.5 2.20 2.2• 300

63 1.0

....I

•,• '•.:• •.•=• •.'.•.;.•0..,S.•

•.•:.•.. •.! !.•.:•. •'[• •.'.•.•.•..•.•

•.•.•.. •.• •.!.:• • •!,•..•.•

•.•:•... •.• •.:• •.:• •.'.•!!,•..•.•

•.•.•... A•.• •!•9. .-•:• •;5•.:.•..•.M

•.7.•.•... B1 30.0 33.0 43 OOAM 669.92 B2 33.0 36.0 9:46:00AM

672.16 B3 36.0 39.0 10 47:30AM

674.83 B4 39.0 42.0 10:50:30 AM 677,02 • • •.• • • • •.• 2.31 2.30 316

64 2.0 2.10 2.10 319

65 1.8 !.•. :•.:.•.• • • • E• !.•.• 1.44 1.43 319

68 1.0 :•.• :•.,• 28o

6o 1.o 2.31 2.30 270

59 1.0 •,.'•.! •:• :•.•0.

• • !:.• • :•.'• •.•. •=• •.• •? • • • 2.62 2.61 254

89 1.0 •:.!• •:•.• 291

60 1.0 1.69 1.69 255

60 1,0 •:•? !:.'• •.• • •. •.• •.:.• •.• !.•.• • • • • •.•. •!.• !.:.!'• • • • • •.•

Final 11:11

692.658 Sum avg •

44.2 I 22868.3 / 20136.8 1 33011.8 •

•omplcteness

•hecked By: Contents Vol. (mL) Post weigh Pro weight gain H20 100 788.8 686.7 102.1 2 H20 100 621.8 629.8 -8 E• 0 607,5 596.3 11.2 4 SG 300 806.3 792.2 14.1
Legibility

Probe Rinse Filter Imp1&2 Total

"='•Team Leader (Signature/DateParticulate Data

Plant ACME BRICK Address Sealy, TX Location Kiln A Outlet Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV Moisture 11.0 "Hg 29.97 HzO -0.46 5.13

Meas

Filter GSC0023 Filter Wt. Traverse Elapsed Time

Clock

DGM Point In Minutes

Time

Reading No. Begin End

24 hr

ft •.! •:• •.:• !A!•_-.•.•

•.•:•.• 6.2 :•.• •.• •.!..•'!.!.;.•.,•.•

•.•.• /•.• 6.0 9.0 11:44:00 AM 697.40
• • !.• !.].•.•.•.•.•

•.•:• •.• !.•,.• !.•,.q !.•..•;•.•..•.•

•.• 6.•. !.•:.q t•.? !./..•.;•..•.•

•.,• •.• !.•:.• •.• •.•.•!•.•.•

• •.• •.:.• •:.• •.•..•.•.•.•

•.• •.• •.• •.• •.•.'•.!.•.•..•

•.•.• ,•.(• 27.0 30.0 12:05:00 PM 714.98 E•.;• •.•,9_ •-3.,9 •.•'!.;•..•.•

•.!•.=•.•L......[ B2 33.0 36.0 12:27:00 PM 718.79 •.3...i ;•:.q •.• •.•.•.;.•..•.• •,• •.•:..o_ •.•,.• •.•.•;•:•.;•.•..•.•

•,•
•.• •2..:.p......[ •.• •.•*•.;.O.•..p•r•

•=•.• B6 45.0 48.0 12:39:00 PM 729.96 B7 48.0 51.0 12:42:00 PM 732.69

Final Sum avg

60.0

•f •,J•;•l

45.1 • 23134.0 •s•fm :•] 20598.4 •a•[ro•l 33653.2 E•.• 54.0 57.0 12:48:00 PM E• •.• •:.• •:. !.•.!•.!.!.•..•.•

12:54

735.21 737,60 739.94 •.•:•

742,094

aeckedBy: •nature/Date) Equipment ID Reag. Box UmbicalTC Meter Pump Est, Moisture

Velocity Stack Temp.
AP °F ...........E•.• • •:• • •:• •.1.• •,.'•.• • •,.•.! :•.!.P •,.•.• •.? •:.•:• :• •:• •.• •.• • •:.•? •. •:• • •.• •.• •.• •.......i •:.•.(. •./•.......! •..L.... •:•.• •..•......I 0.:'• •.......I •:• •..!.......] •=•.• •.L...I •:.•.• ;]•.•.......I IRun No._ 2

100ft Meter box TC Readout 10175 Nozzle 22.21 gm H•O

DGM Temp,F
78.5•,.•

•.•,.•.•.•,.••.!.:.••.:•,:,••.:•.:.••:.•,.....,.i

84.58565•:•..,....1

Date •,•00•

49.192 o.429 3°•'5 62'1 Checks

Pre Mid A 12.44 Vacuum

16

16 01/12/06 Y

0.996 DGM •H• Final DGM 1/12/06 c•

Leak

0,003

0.004 1/12/06 DN

0,297 Pitot

Good

Good 125.7 M3A 3:5 '•CO•

Good

Good 11,0 16.5 %Oz

Good

Good 100.0 Fo= 1.25714

MS 27.991

Md 29.22 Orifice Pressure

Probe Box Filter Imping• Pump IAH i,, H20

Temp. Temp• Outlet Temp, Vac.

Notes Desired IActual oF OF OF °F Hg •:.• ;•:• 210

63 o.5
2.25 2.25 240

55 0.5 •:•'•, ;•:4.! 240

56 0.5 2.46 2,46 250

56 0.5 2.62 2.61 250

58 0.5 1.95 1.94 248

60 0.5 1.69 1.69 255

61 0,5 1.74 1.74 251

64 0.5 1.54 1.53 254

64 0.5 •.:•'• •.:.•.• •.......i • • • •:• •:.:• •.•:• 257

65 0.5 2.67 2.66 255

54 0.5 2.82 2.02 256

53 0,5 2,92 2,92 255

55 •:.•..........i.......•.:• •

,57 •:.• •:.• •:•.• • •

• •:.•

•:•.• •=.•.• •.•

•.• •:.• •.:.• •.:•.• •.•

•.! ?:.• ;/.:.• •.:•.• • • • •.! •:•

H20 100 H20 100 Em 0 SG 300

Legibility 797.6 715.6 82.0

Probe Rinse 640.4 616.6 23.8

Filter 610.0 602.6 7.4 801.8 789.3 12.5

Total
QA/QC Check •S Accuracy easonablencss

Team Leader (Signature/Date)Particulate Data

Plant ACM_E BRICK Address Sealy, TX Location Kiln A Outlet Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV %Moisture 11,2 PBr "Hg

29:97 I•staticin H20

-0.46 K 5.13 Filter #__GSC0024 Filter Wt. Meas

Traven Elapsed Time Clock

DGM Point In Minutes

Time Reading No. Begin End 24hr

ft A1 0.0 3.0 1:58:00 PM 742.327 A2 3.0 6.0 2:01:00 PM 745.510 A3 6.0 9.0 2:04:00 PM 74&220 A4 9.0 12.0 2:07:00 PM 750.970
,•§ 15.0 18.0 2:13:00PM

•.9. A7 18.0 21.0 2;16:00 PM 759.310 A8 21.0 24.0 2:19:00 PM 762.020 • •:•:• •.•:• •....2.•.!££.•.•

•,•=•£ •.!.o. •:.• •.o.:• •....•.!£•..•.•

-(•:.•
• •0. •.•.• •.•,!£;£•..•.r•

(•:.•.! 36,0 2:43:00 PM 771.180 132 33.O B3 36,0 39.0 46 00 PM 774.930 IB4 39.0 42.0 2 49 00 PM 776,420 B5 42.0 45 2:52:00 PM 779.110 B6 45.0 48.0 2:55:00 PM 782.720 [37 48.0 51,0 2:58:00 PM 784.340 • •.•? •.:• •.•£t!•..•.•

•.!£ • •:? •.•:• •5!£•..•.•

•.•.• B10 57.0 60.0 3:07:00 PM 790.370 792.129

Final 15:1o IRun No. 3

Rea0. Box MS Samp. Umblcal 100ft Meier box 01/12/06; Stack TC ReadoLr 01/12/0E 10175 Pilot

01/12/0E Pump NA Nozzle

01/12/06 Est. Moisture 22. gm H20 129.1 B• 11.2 /B::,:= 100.0 Velocity

0.45•,.•

•:.•'•

•,.••'••.••.•

•:.••.•9:.•9:•(

•:.•

[Date 4/12/2006

[Job# Job#ABSE100 Constants Checks

Pro Mid A=
&He,C• 0.840 D 0.297 M3A 3.5 %CO• 16,5 •o= 1.25714

Sum avg •
•'•%•)• 44,8 t'¢/i• 22938.0 •ril •/:•i 20372.3
• 33431.1 Vacuum

17

16.5 Init DGM Final DGM

0.003

0.004 Good Good Nozzle Good

Good •tack Good

Good Ms 27.96[

M 29.22

Notes

Completeness ,/ / •-.P?• • Legibility

• Accuracy •IP ,•Sign•u•ate) T¢=n Leader (Signature,•.) Contents Vol. (mL, •ost weigh Pro weight gain H20 100 779.1 683,3 95.8 H20' 100 650.4 631,8 18.6 E• 0 598.5 595.8 2.7 SG 300 818.3 806.3 12 49.802 0.423 310"0 86,7

• 3.• ?... 87.5 1.90 1,89 252

58 0.5 304 87 1.39 1.38 243

58 0.5 310 86.5 2.05 2.05 253

62 1.0 :•.U • •:• •:'• •.• • • •.• •.:.£ 312 87.5 2.51 51 246

55 1.0 313 88.5 62 61 257

57 1,0 313 88.5 67 2.66 254

57 1.0 311 89 2.21 2.15 256

57 1.0 310 89.5 1.69 69 251

58 0.5 310 89.5 1.39 1.38 252

59 0.5 309 89.5 1.33 1.33 253

60 0.5 303 90.5 18 17 256

60 0.5Acme

Brick Particulate Matter Lab Summary Test Bate: Sealy. TX April 12, 2006 Kiln Stack- Outlet

Run Run Run Date 4/12/2006 Run Start Time

9:13 11:38 13:58
Run Finish Time

12:54 15:10

Filter Data Run Run Run

Filter Number

61 52 53
Final weight (mg) 0.3622 0.3653 0.3667 Final weight (mg) 0.3622 0.3651 0.3665 Final weight (rag) =ina Filter Weight (rag) 0.3622 0.3652 0.3666

Filter Tare (rag) 0.3410 0.3391 0.3410 Filter Tare (mg) 0.3414 0.3390 0.3410 Filter Tare (rag) 0.3412 0,3391 0.3410

Probe Rinse (acetone)

Filter Gain (rag)

21.00 26.15 25.60

Beaker Number 7 Volume 191 224 269

293

Final weight

121.2476 121.1034 121.0374

123.5957 Final weight

121 2475 121.1032 121,0372

123.5955

Beaker Gain (mg) blank mg/mL

Gains Final Beaker Weight (g) 121.24755 121.1033 121.0373

Tare Weight (g) 121.2392 121.0889 121.0237 Tare Weight (g) "21.2392 121.0887 121.0239 Tare Weight (g) Beaker Tare (g) 121.2392 121.0888 121,023•]

8.35 14.50 13.50

Probe Rinse

8.35 14.50 13.50 Filter 21.00 26,15 25.60 29.35 40.65 39.10

123.5956

123.5954 123.5956

123.5955

0.10

QA/QC Check Legibility •T•a•

•nalure/Date)

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. Deer Park. TXSummary Table Compliance Testing DLA Inlet Plant ACME BRICK Location DLA Inlet

Address

Sealy• Texas Personnel JK, GG• GB, MB, GV ABSE100

Date Start
CpYPBrAH
t.•Vmstd VlcVwstd % H•O •V•fd%CO2 %02 % CO+ N2 MaPgPats
VsQsd
HCI ppmw HCIppmd HCI Ibs/hr

Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature,

°F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature,

°F Average Velocity Head; inches of H20 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmw Hydrogen Chloride Concentration,

ppmd Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr HF ppmw

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmw HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration,

ppmd HF Ibs/hr

Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 4/12/2006 9:10 10:21246O 0.84 0.981 29.97 1.50 39.297 71.25 38.520 108.8 5.12 11.73 0.883 4.00 14.50 81.5 29.22 27.90 -0.61 29.93 313.8 0.179 29.2 19.147 20,211 33,554 14.27 16.17 1.86 203.72 230.80 14.53

2

3 4/12/2006 4/12/200( 11:35 14:00 12:35 15:00 24 24 60 60 0.84 0.84 0,981 0.981 29.97 29.97 1.50 1.50 40.053 41.353 79.50 81.67 38.660 39.756 101.6 103.8 4.78 4.89 11.01 10.94 0.890 0.891 3.50 4.00 14.50 14.50 82.0 81.5 29.14 29.22 27.91 27.99 -0.82 -0.78 29.91 29.91 328.3 326.7 0.182 0.186 29.8 30.1 19.147 19,147 20,402 20,643 34,240 34,546 20.39 15.44 22.91 17.34 2.65 2.03 169.66 176.68 190.65 198.39 12.12 12,76 Average

60 0.84 0.981 29.97 1.50 40.23477:47 38.979 104:7 4.9311:23 0.888 3.833 14:500 81.7 29.19 27.94 -0.74 29.92 322;94 0.182 29.7! 19.147 20,419 34,113 16.70 18.81 2.18 183.35 206.62 13.14Plant

Acme Brick Address Sealy, Texas Location Kiln Stack

PBr in"Hg Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV P static inH•O

Method

1 & 2 Data Sheet

Date

04/12/06

ABSE100

29.40 iO/o moisture 11.0 MS

27,99 %Oz

14.5 -0.31 Fo

1,60 | Time

Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port, inches Width (if Rectangular) Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness,

inches Diameter, inches Equivanlent Diameter (only when rectangular) Area in square feet 66.500
7.25 59.25
19.15 Straight Distance before sampling location, inches

480.0 Number of Diameters Before Location* 8.1 Straight Distance after sampling location, inches

960.0 Number of Diameters After Location* 16.2 Enter "P" for Particulates

or "V" for velocity

p Minimum Number of Total Points 12 Number of Total Points Chosen OK 24 Number of Ports OK 2 Number of Points per Port OK 12

Draw sampling location, plan & top view. Distance

Stack Yaw & Velocity Data % Duct from Outside

Yaw Angle AP Temp Velocity Points Depth

of Port

Degrees inch H20 °F FeeUsec A1 2.1%

8.49

0 1.20 280 73.0 A2 6.7%

11.22

0 1.05 279 68.3 A3 11.8%

14.24

0 1.05 285 68.6
A5 25.0%

22.06

0 1.20 284 73.2 A6 35.6%

28.34

0 1.20 283 73.2 A7 64.4%

45.41 A8 75.0%

5t.69 A9 82.3%

56.01 •,•.• • S.:.•/•

.• •,; '•1 All 93.3%

62.53 A12 97.9%

65.26 B1 2.1%

8.49 B2 6.7%

11.22 • •..•.•,•

!.•,•.• B4 17,7%

17.74 B5 25.0%

22.06 B6 35.6%

28.34 • •:M:°#•

•,:• B8 75.0%

51.69 B9 82.3%

56.01 B10 88.2%

59.51 Btl 93.3%

62.53 B12 97.9%

65.26

Average

0.0 1.149 282.7 71.60
dscfm 51,080

Leader (Signature/Date)Method 1-4 Data DLA Inlet

Plant ACME BRICK Address Sealy, Texas Location DLA Inlet Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV % Moisture

11.7 PBr "Hg

29.97 P HzO

-0.61

Equipment ID Reag. 8ox M5 Umbical 100ft Meas :Stack TC Meter box 10175 Orsat Pump NA Est, Moisture

22,2 IRun No._
Date Samp. box NA Meter box 01/12/06 TC Readout 1119/06 =i|ot 1/12/06 •!ozzle 1/12106 gm H•O

108.8 B•asumd 1t.7 B•=tum•<+ 100.0

Date "12/200S Constants Y 0.981 ¢• 0.840 DM3 4.0 %COz 14.5 %02 FO 1.6

[Job # ABSE100 Checks Pre Mid Post Vacuum (in. Hg) 15

10 Init DGM Final DGM

0.000

0.000 =itot Good X Good klozzle Good X Good Stack TC

Good X Good Me 27.901

M0 29.22 Traverse Elapsed Time Clock

DGM Point in Minutes

Time Reading No, Begin End 24 hr fP A1 0.0 5.0 9:10:00 AM 564.714

A5 20.0 25.0 9:30:00 AM 578.00 A6 25,0 30.0 9:35:00 AM 581.44 A7 30.0 35.0 9:40:00 AM 584.73
•,.• 40.0 45.0 9:50:00 AM 591,47

B2

B8B9R10

Final 10:21 ;04.011 avg Sum

22898.6 20211.5 i| 33554.3

Checked By: • Velocity Stack DGM Temp. Temp. AP °F °F

£4 ;+• •,•+

•::+.++ • • •4.•. •2. •.• £,J.• •q

£:• 318 £• •.!,•. •:• •.

AHin H+O

Temp: Setup. °ut'et Temp" vec.

Note',, C, esire,• l,",o,oa, o• F °• °t•

•.: • p. 1',•£ 67 2.9 :t:•.P. !•.• :%..] • • •?• •,.•
!.:A• !,.•? • •: ?. •+• •,•

1.50 1.50 68 2.0 1.50 1.50 44 1,50 1.50 44 2.0 1.50 1.50 45 2+0

1.50 1.50 47 2.0

0.17 328 0.09 328

Contents VoL (mL) Post Weight Pre weight gain H20 100 828,2 738.0 90.2 2 H20 100 693.8 687.3 6.5 3 Dry 0 629,1 623.6 5.5 4 SG

871.9 865.3 6.6 QA/QC Check Legibility Accuracy •-. Reasonableness

Team Leader(Signature/Date)Method 1-4 Data DLA Inlet

Plant ACME BRICK Address Sealy, Texas Location Kiln Stack Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV Moisture 11.0 IPBr in"Hg

29;97 HtO -0.82
LFilt WI.
Traverse Point No,
A1A2

•9 Elapsed Time

Clock In Minutes

Time Begin End 24 hr
0.0 5.o 11:35:OOAM 6.0 10.0 11:40:00AM 10.0 15.0 11:45:00AM 15.0 20.0 11:50:00 AM 20.0 25.0 11:55:00AM 25.0 30.0 12:00:00 PM 30.0 35.0 12:05:00 PM 35.0 40.0 12:10:00 PM 40.0 45.0 12:15:00PM

Meas

IRun No._ Equipment ID

Cal Date Box M5 Samp. box 100ft Meter box 8tack TC

TC Readout 6ox 10175 Pitot Pump NA Nozzle IEst. • "•,2 gm H20

Date 4/12/2006

Job# ABSE100
Constants Checks

Pre Mid Post NA A,

19.1 01112/06 Y

0.981 01/12/06 ,',1•

t.781 1/12/o6 C•

0,940 1/12/06 DN 101,6 M3

3.5 %COz 11.0 14.5 %Oz 100.0 Fo= 1.82857 Velocity Stack DGM Odfice Pressure

Probe Box Temp, Temp. •H in }-[20

Temp. Temp. ,•p o17 o17 Desired Actual E °F •/acuum

15

15 nit DGM Final DGM _eak rate

0.005

0,004 Pitot Good

Good Iozzle Good

Good tack TC

Good

Good Ms 27.911

M, 29.14

Notes DGM Filter Imping. Pump Reading Outlet Temp. Vac. f•3 F °F Hg 607,858 611.50 0..::•.'• • • 1.60 1.50 69 2.0
0.12 297 78 1.50 1.50 42 2.0 014.02 0.10 aoo 78 1.50 t.50 43 2.0 617.92 0.21 311 79 1,50 1.50 44 2.0 621.40 0.23 317 79 1.50 1.50 45 2.0 624.90 0:24 327 80 1.50 1.50 47 2.0 528.25 0.19 3al 80 1.50 1.50 4• •.0 631,67 0.23 333 80 1,50 1.50 48 2.0 63S.02 0.2• 334 80 1.50 a.50 50 2.0 A10 45,0 50.0 12:20:00 PM 638.40

0.22 335 80 1.50 1.50 50 2.0
All 50.0 55.0 12:25:00 PM 641,52

16 335 81 1.50 1.50 51 2.0
A12 55.0 60.0 12:30:00 PM 6•.73

0,11 335 81 1.50 1.50 51 2.0

B3 0.16 330 B4 o.,6 aaa
o.• 334 •.••7 z4 343 B8 0.27 3•

B10 0.28 346

B12 •:..•.• •..•..•

Contents Vol, (mL• Post weigh Pre weight gain Final 12:35

647.911

H20 100 603.1 718,6 84.5

Probe Rinse H20 160 702.9 B93,9 9

Filter Dry 625.8 625.1 0.7

Impinger Catch 4 SG 300 937.3 929.9 7.4

Total

Completeness • •

Legibility

J

QA]QC Check • Accuracy Specifi ca[ion.§.•

Re•sonabl

Checked By: Team (Signature/Date) Ib/mmBTU 29.8 22925.8 20402.1 34239,5Method 1-4 Data DLA Inlet

Plant ACME BRICK Address Sealy, Texas Location Kiln Stack Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV % Moisture

10,9 Per "Hg

29.97 HzO -0,78 K
Filter Filter Wt. Umbi(iiuipment

ID Reag. Box M5100ft Meas Stack TC IMeter box 1017{ IOrsat Pump NA !Est. Moisture 22.2 [Run No., 3 Cal Samp. box NA Meter box 01112106 TC Readoul

Nozzle 01/12/06 gm H•O

103.8 B 10.9 B•u•=•d 100

Date 4/12/2006

[Job# ABSE100 Constants As 19.1 Y 0.981

D Checks

Pre Mid Post Vacuum 15

10 Init DGM Final DGM Leak

0.005

0.000

M3 4.0 %CO= 14.5 Fo= 1.6 Pitot

Good

Good •ozzle Good

Good Stack TC Good

Good MS 27.99J

Md 29,22 Travers Elapsed Time Clock DGM Velocily Point In Minutes

Time Reading No. Begin End 24 hr ft A1 0.0 5.0 2:00:00 PM 648.258 0.06 • •:• !,•9 •.,q•..•.•.•

•.•.!.•.q •::•.• • •:• !.•P •!.!•!.•.•.•

•.•:•.• o..::•,•

• •.0.: 9 •..s.• •..-•;.q,o..•.•

•,•:!.•9 •:• .% ;•.•:9 •.9:.0. •;.•;.o.•.,•.•

•.•: .s.•.• ,o.:• "• •.•:? ?.P.:• •!•!,•.•.M

P.•.•:•.• •:• ,• :•.•:.• •P=• ;•!.•!.•.•.•.....•.•:•P

•:• A9 40.0 45.0 2:40:00 PM 675.900 0.24 • •.• •:L...i..,...•.•...P

•!•!.•,•.•

•:,•P •:•. •..• •9:•....:i......•.s.:.•

•;.•,o..-'9•..•.•

•.•:•[• •::•.• •-•.• •:.o. •p:.p •!.•;.•.•.•

•.•:•.p .o.:•.p. .a.•. •o,.:•

.•p.•;.o,,.o,.•.•..

.•.•.•:•:•.• •::/.:• • o..::•.s., B3 0.14

B5 0.21 B6 0.16 B7 0.24 B8 0.28

B10 0.24 Bll 0.16

Final 15:00 •89.611

°F °F IDesired Actua• °F o• o• o• "•

309 79 1,50 1.50 51 2,0 313 79 1.50 1.50 54 2.0 311 80 1.50 1.50 56 0 •'•.• •'• "•.:•.• •1.:• •

57 2.0

314•.!.•. 32333O 331331335339

343

343

Contents Vol, (mL', =ost weigh Preweight

gain H20 100 778,1 699.3 78.8 2 H20 100 715.4 702,9 12.5 34545.8 3 Dry

628.4 625.8 2,6 B•U/tt•:q 4 SG

947.2 937.3 9.9 QA/QC Check Completeness Legibilily

Accuracy

Personnel (Sign•)

Team Leader(Signature/Date) Ehecked By:2813461159 Acme Brick Company

SFP

FULL1/32/3 FULL1/3213 FULL1/3
FUI.J. 1/3Z/3 FULL1/3•J3 FU ,U• 1/3•3 FULLI/3
FULL1/3

1/32/3 FULL1/3213 FULLI/3
FULL2/3 FULL1/32t3 FULL 41t3

O:'M/ :40 4/13 0:38:20

2t3 4Pl 3 • ;05:00

FU• 4I• 3 • :3• :40

•/3 •I3 •:58:20

•3 •13 2:25:• •I•3 2:51:40 •13 3:t8:20 •3 3;45:• •t3 •:38:20 •13 5:05:•

FU• •13 5:58:2004/1t/2006 NON i4:12 FAX 2813461159

Acme Brick Company

SFP

SCRUBBER EXHAUST

•ADING8 12q'LET

9:ISAM 9:30A2VI 9:45A•M 10:00•2V[ lO:15AM

11 :O0•kIVi II:ISAM 1130A, IVI 11:45AM 12:00PM 12;15Pik/i 12:30PM 12:45PM I:00PM 1 :tStr/vI I:30PM 1:45PM 2:00PM 2:15PM7 2"•OPM 2:45PM • :OOPM

.g.8.8.8.g.8.8.8.8.8.8.g.g.8.8.g-8.8,8.8.8.8.8

April 12, 2006 OUTLET 1,41.41.41.41.41.41.41.4!.41.4I..41.41.41.4i.4-1.41.4
1.41,4To:

Bob Boting From: CYaig Moflock Subject: Lime Weight per Cycle Da|c: 4-i 2-06
On 4-12-06 Frank emptied the I/me hopper, then weighed the hopper empty and waited for •he scrubber to cycle 2 times andreweighe•l the hopper again @ 119ibs /2 cycles is 49•5 tbs per cycle. The Kiln firemen empty the hopper every third full push ( nine scrubber cycles), this e•asures fl•at the scrubber runs on a constant cycle rate of 114 lbs per hour or 2,741.52 lhs per 2.4 hours.PARTICULATES LOG CLIENT: Acme

Brick-Sealy-TX PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSE'i01 DATE:

April •9, 2006 FILTER TYPE:

Glass

Microfibre

FILTER ID

GSL060058-0002
GSL060058-0005

GSL060058•008

CLIENT

ID

DLA-OUT-2

DLAOUT-5

LAB NO. 000051 000052

iNITIAL WEIGHT 0.3412 0.3391

FINAL

WEIGHT 0.3622 0.3652
DLAOUT-8 000053 0.3410 0.3666

931 Seaco Court ® Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898

• Fax (281)476-9876Laboratory Analysis

Report
CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX PROJECT NO :GSL060058/GSC06AB SE 101 MEDIA:Glass Microfibre

Filter RECEIVING

DATE:4/14/2006 ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 REPORT DATE:4/19/2006

GSL060058-0002
GSL060058-0005
GSL060058-0008 51
52
53

21.00
26.10
25.60

Claudio de Vera Analyst Sidney Bonnette QC CoordinatorPARTICULATES LOG CLIENT: Acme

Brick-Sealy-T× DATE:

A=£Eil 19, 2_006
PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSEo'•01 MEDIA:

ACETONE

SAMPLE ID

CLIENT

GSL060058-0001 DLAOUT-1
GSL060058-0004 DLAOUT-4
GSL060058-0007 DLAOUT-7
GSL060058-0010 DLAOUT-B1 LAB

VOLUME NO. (ml) Beaker4 191

INITIAL WEIGHT FINAL WEIGHT 121.2392 121.2476 Beaker 224

121.0888

121.1033 6Beaker 269

121.0238

121.0373 7 Beaker 293

123.5955

123.5956 8

931 Seaco Court ® Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898

® Fax (281)476-9876Laboratory Analysis

Report

CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX PROJECT NO:GSL060058/GSC06ABSE101 MEDIA:Acetone RECEIVING

DATE:4/14/2006 ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 REPORT DATE:4/19/2006

GSL060058-0001 Beaker 4

8.40

GSL060058-0004 Beaker 6

14.50

GSL060058-0007 Beaker 7

13.50
GSL060058-0010 Beaker 8

0.10

Claudio de Vera Analyst Sidney Bonnette QC CoordinatorSPEC|ALTY LABORATORY, LTD,

PARTICULATES

LOG CLIENT: Acrne

Brick-Sealy=TX PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSE=101 DATE:

April !.9, 2006 MEDIA: H=•O

SAMPLE ID

CLIENT

iD

GSL060058-0003 DLAOUT-3
GSL060058-0006 DLAOUT-6

LABNO. Beaker9 Beaker 10 Beaker 11

VOLUME (mi)244232

INITIAL WEIGHT 1 O3.1546 100.4591

FINAL WEIGHT 103.1608 100.4622
GSL060058-0009 DLAOUT-9 228

104.201

1

104.2149 Beaker GSL060058-0012 DLAOUT-B2 235

121.5945

121.5946 12

931 Seaco Court o Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898

• Fax (281)476-9876Laboratory Analysis

Report
CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX PROJECT NO:GSL060058/GSC06ABSE101 MEDIA:H20 RECEIVING

DATE:4/14/2006 ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 REPOR]- DATE:4/19/2006

GSL060058-0003 Beaker 9

6.20
GSL060058-0006 Beaker 10

3.10
GSL060058-0009 Beaker 11
•SL060058-0012 Beaker 12

13.80
0.10

Claudio de Vera Analyst Sidnev•Bo•n:

£

QC CoordinatorL: L: • o [] []eoueq•osqv000 •0 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • e0ueqJ0sqveoueqJosq v <
W0

0d

d d o o d d o d • d • eoueqJosqv0

Woo

00

eoueqJosqvGasSurrogate DateFacility Location HCI

Cylinder SF6 Cylinder Spike 1 SF6 Stack Baseline DFPredicted Over Under Actual % Recovery

Hydrogen

Chloride Hydrogen Fluoride April 11, 2006 ACME Brick Sealy, Texas 2984

0.41 16.07 9.76 46.61 60.59 32.63 34.67 74.38 Pass

Spiking

Spike 2 SF6 Stack Baseline DF Predicted Over Under Actual

0.41 17.37 9.76 47.91 62.28 33.54 36.64 76.48 Pass

Spike 2 SF6 Stack Baseline DF Predicted Over Under Actual

0.40 18.83 10.00 48.63 63.22 34.04 37.87 77.87 Pass

Average
0:41 17.42 9.84 47.72 62.03 33.40 36.39 76.24 PassSpiking Raw Data # methodFile(s)

C:\l\Methods•ACME3.method SF6

HCl 4/12/2006 2:18

0.00

17.62 4/12/2006 2:20

0.00

17.23 4/12/2006 2:22

0.00

16.42 4/12/2006 2:24

0.00

16.07 4/12/2006 2:26

0,00

16.09 4/12/2006 2:28

0.00

16.35 0.00 16.17 4/12/2006 2:30

0.04

15.98 4/12/2006 2:32

0.37

18.34 4/12/2006 2:34

0.41

26.87 4/12/2006 2:36

0.42

29.97 4/12/2006 2:38

0.42

31.47 4/12/2006 2:40

0.42

32.75 4/12/2006 2:42

0.41

35.29 4/12/2006 2:44

0.42

34.49 4/12/2006 2:46

0.41

34.99 4/12/2006 2:48

0.41

34.51 0,41 34.67 4/12/2006 2:50

0,18

24.58 4/12/2006 2:52

0.01

17.69 4/12/2006 2:54

0.00

16.06 4/12/2006 2:56

0.00

16.05 4/12/2006 2:58

0.00

16.27 4/12/2006 3:00

0.00

15.81 4/12/2006 3:02

0.00

15.80 0.0O 15.96 4/12/2006 3:04

0.03

15.14 4/12/2006 3:06

0.36

20.69 4/12/2006 3:08

0.41

29.82 4/12/2006 3:10

0.41

32.83 4/12/2006 3:12

0.41

34.41 4/12/2006 3:14

0.41

35.91 4/12/2006 3:16

0.41

37.35 4/12/2006 3:18

0.41

36.51 4/12/2006 3:20

0.41

36.58 4/12/2006 3:22

0.41

36.83 0.41 36.64 4/12/2006 3:24

0.19

27.46 4/12/2006 3:26

0.01

19.02 4/12/2006 3:28

0.00

18.23 4/12/2006 3:30

0.00

16.22 4/12/2006 3:32

0.00

15.75 4/12/2006 3:34

0.00

18.84 4/12/2006 3:36

0.00

18.90 4/12/2006 3:38

0.00

18.56 O.0O 18.77

Baseline

Spike 1

Baseline

Spike 2

Baseline4/12/2006 3:40 4/12/2006 3:42 4/12/2006 3:44 4/12/2006 3:46 4/12/2006 3:48 4/12/2006 3:50 4/12/2006 3:53 4/12/2006 3:55 4/12/2006 3:57 4/12/2006 3:59 4/12/2006 4:01 4/12/2006 4:03 4/12/2006 4:05 4/12/2006 4:07

SF60.24 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.02 0.03 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HCl 23.40 33.40 36.12 36.66 38.04 38.91 37.87 27.25 19.57 18.59 15.68 18.36 18.85 18.83 18.99 18.89

Spike 3

Baseline!i IIRun

1 0900-1026 Timestamp 4/12/2006 9:00 4/12/2006 9:02 4112/2006 9:04 4/12/2006 9:06 4/12/2006 9:08 4/12/2006 9:10 4/12/2006 9:12 4/12/2006 9:14 4/12/2006 9:16 4/12/2006 9:18 4/12/2006 9:20 4/12/2006 9:22 4/12/2006 9:24 4/12/2006 9:26 4/12/2006 9:28 4/12/2006 9:30 4/12/2006 9:32 4/12/2006 9:34 4/12/2006 9:36 4/12/2006 9:38 4/12/2006 9:40 4/12/2006 9:42 4/12/2006 9:44 4/12/2006 9:46 4/12/2006 9:48 4/12/2006 9:50 4/12/2006 9:52 4/12/2006 9:54 4/12/2006 9:56 4/12/2006 9:58 4/12/2006 10:00 4/12/2008 10:02 4/12/2006 10:04 4/12/2006 10:06 4/12/2006 10:08 4/1212006 10:10 4/12/2006 10:12 4/12/2006 10:14 4/12/2008 10:16 4/12/2006 t 0:18 4/12/2006 10:20 4/12/2006 10:22 4/12/2006 10:24 4/12/2006 10:26 Averages Inlet FTIR Data HCI HCIError

HF HFError

HCI 17.86 0.44

280.18

3.67

14.11 18.23 0.45

288.81

3.61

14.92 19.30 0.55

296.39

4.43

15.18 19.97 0.55

289.09

3.74

16.05 19.89 0.60

289.17

4.26

15.97 19.94 0.56

288.60

5.16

16.56 20.33 0.56

294.37

5.12

17.44 19,12 0.57

282.13

4.11

18.39 17.72 0.47

236,04

3.36

18.69 18.05 0.48

223.84

3.12

18.11 16.59 0.43

202.82

3.09

16.50 15.23 0.41

207.22

3.16

14.85 14.57 0.40

211.25

3.23

15.48 14.71 0.41

221.07

2.70

16.01 14.11 0.40

213.62

2.76

16.21 13.65 0.39

213.37

2,72

15.83 14.69 0.40

223.79

2.74

15.79 14.45 0.39

208.58

2.74

15.79 14.22 0.39

212.64

2.74

16.36 14.05 0.38

211.19

2.78

15.69 14.26 0.42

215.51

2.71

14.77 12.15 0.37

193.31

2.64

14.59 15.50 0.41

218.64

2.71

14.06 13.65 0.39

172.59

2.68

13.27 12.75 0.35

169.91

2.63

12.06 12.42 0.37

166.03

2.61

3.96 11.51 0.44

162.08

2.65

0.97 11.53 0.41

165.11

2.59

0.64 11.59 0.39

164.10

2.66

2.89 11.64 0.39

166.25

2.57

6.92 11.83 0.41

170.39

2.66

6.70 12.22 0.38

175.95

2.68

6,52 12.58 0.39

176.95

2.69

6.32 13.03 0.39

182.13

2.67

6.69 11.65 0.38

165.10

2.52

6.77 11.56 0.43

180,71

2.68

6.69 12.45 0.37

168.68

2.67

6.65 11.21 0.39

140.90

2.50

5.88 10.13 0.35

131.75

2.47

6.39 9.51 0.39

127.95

2:42

6.50 10.61 0.40

141.49

2.51

6.28 11.32 0.39

156.99

2.59

6.00 12,69 0.45

184.22

2.67

5.68 13.65 0.37

172.77

2.35

5.26 14.27 0.42

203.72

2.99

11.28

Outlet FTIR Data HCIError HF 0.46 25.09 0,46 27.04 0.78 28.39 0.86 26.67 0.85 28.84 0.83 28.15 0.86 29.25 0.87 31.18 0.86 29.35 0.86 30,92 0.79 25,55 0.52 24.8O 0.80 24.52 0.78 28.88 &78 29.49 0.80 31.12 0.78 28.16 0,78 28.85 0.78 29.58 0.77 28.45 0.76 27.94 0.44 26.80 0.43 26.38 0.42 26.14 0.39 23.92 0.21 6.77 0.09 2.11 0.08 1.36 0.17 3.26 0.42 13.12 0.39 12.36 0.27 11.79 0.27 10.81 0.28 11.75 0.28 12.57 O.40 11.98 0.38 11.72 0.26 10.22 0.28 10.87 0.27 11.08 0.27 10.16 0.28 10.58 0.29 11.99 0.28 11.25 0.52 20.03

HFError 0.911.011.010.96 0.98 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.911.010.90 0.84 0.89 0.94 0.92 1.02 0.940.95 0.93 0.910.95 0.92 0.89 0.910.82 0.410.13 0.130.150.53 0.540.550.530.530.53 0.510.50 0.46 0.48 0.490.50 0.510.53 0.510.72Run

2 1134-1252 Inlet FTIR Data Timestamp HCI HCIError

HF HFError 4/12/2006 11:34

10.33

0.42

120.97

1.03 4/12/2006 11:36

12.61

0.37

126,62

1.08 4/12/2006 11:38

12.30

0.39

126.65

1.08 4/12/2006 11:40

13.02

0.37

135.46

2.58 4/12/2006 11:42

12.77

0.38

138.34

2.59 4/12/2006 11:44

13.09

0.40

141.12

2.59 4/12/2006 11:46

13.80

0.40

165.09

2.69 4/12/2006 11:48

18.87

0.46

296.85

5.71 4/12/2006 11:50

22.77

0.56

301.55

5.49 4/12/2006 11:52

24.38

0.63

267.65

4.31 4/12/2006 11:54

24.82

0.64

245.67

3.54 4/12/2006 11:56

21.82

0.64

171.00

2.47 4/12/2006 11:58

24.43

0.64

201.91

2.73 4/12/2006 12:00

24.12

0.63

191.43

2.73 4/12/2006 12;02

23.75

0.62

185.73

2.78 4/12/2006 12:04

23.13

0.62

177.27

2.77 4/12/2006 12:06

23.21

0.57

171.99

2.73 4/12/2006 12:08

23.11

0.64

171.46

2.69 4/12/2006 12:10

23.42

0.61

170.86

2.65 4/12/2006 12:12

24.12

0.61

173.98

2.66 4/12/2006 12:14

24.67

0.58

174.10

2.72 4/12/2006 12:16

24.95

0.62

173.69

2.65 4/12/2006 12:18

25.15

0.64

176.11

2.64 4/12/2006 12:20

25.12

0.65

175.83

2.62 4/12/2006 12:22

20.00

0.55

127.26

2.40 4/12/2006 12:24

22.65

0.58

148.82

2.53 4/12/2006 12:26

23.20

0.57

153.15

2.59 4/12/2006 12:28

22.64

0.57

153.51

2.59 4/12/2006 12:30

21.85

0.61

152.11

2.61 4/12/2006 12:32

21.99

0.61

153.64

2.60 4/12/2006 12:34

21.91

0.56

153.90

2.61 4/12/2006 12:36

21.80

0.56

156.62

2.58 4/12/2006 12:38

21.99

0.57

159.33

2.57 4/12/2006 12:40

21.77

0.60

157.98

2.59 4/12/2006 12:42

18.78

0.55

156.24

2.61 4/12/2006 12:44

18.95

0.43

155.98

2.55 4/12/2006 12:46

19.04

0.43

159.30

2.63 4/12/2006 12:48

16.46

0.39

137.23

2.50 4/12/2006 12:50

16.17

0.43

135.81

2.55 4/12/2006 12:52

16.78

0.41

144.22

2.62 Averages 20.39

0.54

169,66

2.72
Run 3 1355-1508 Inlet FTIR Data Timestamp HCI HCIError

HF HFError 4/12/2006 13:55

13.00

0.39

127.39

0.97 4/12/2006 13:57

12.73

0.39

133.77

2.44 4/12/2006 13:59

13.12

0.35

131.43

2.43 4/12/2006 14:01

12.92

0.43

131.86

2.48 4/12/2006 14:03

12.26

0.35

124.79

1.02 4/12/2006 14:05

11.65

0.41

126.85

1.04 Outlet FTIR Data HCI HClError

HF HFError 7.42 0.47 7.83 0.71 8,39 0.51 8.37 0.48 8.93 0.41 8.89 0.42 8.79 0.41 8.08 0.47 7.88 0.47 7.85 0.48 8.01 0.47 7.87 0.47 7.48 0.46 7.64 0.45 7.36 0.49 7.60 0.46 7.47 0.45 7.42 0.45 7.41 0.45 7.61 0.47 7.69 0.46 6.12 0.26 1.56 0.12 0.71 0.11 0.53 0.10 1.74 0.15 7.64 0.43 9.39 0.41 10.80 0.41 11.29 0,41 11.40 0.40 11.53 0.41 12.08 0.41 12.73 0.43 12.66 0.42 12.24 0.43 12.25 0.43 12.03 0.43 12.00 0.43 11.42 0.41 8.40 0.41

26.17 28.70 28.06 27.84 28.44 27.22 26.34 24.06 25.20 25.70 25.09 25.25 24.61 24.30 24.75 23.66 23.76 22.63 22.85 27.12 26.33 19.00 4.87 2.02 1.42 2.49 15.17 18.28 21.79 21.35 22.12 22.37 22.30 23.66 22.11 21.71 20.77 21.21 19.96 19.12 21.49

0.920.93 0.940.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 0.94 0.951.000.96 0.980.96 0.94 0.920.93 0.910.610.601.000.96 0.530.190.130.140.160.460.520.600.60 0.620.620.630.980.610.610.620.630.590.57 0.73 Outlet FTIR Data HCI HCIError

HF HFError 9.48 0.39

19.92

0.62 9.51 0.39

19.99

0.62 9.86 0.39

21.70

0.61 9.69 0.41

26.98

1.06 11.03 0.42

29.46

1.02 10.31 0.41

29.95

1.044/12/2006 14:08

11.52

0.38

128.20

1.01 4/12/2006 14:10

10.44

0.39

115.21

0.98 4/12/2006 14:12

12.24

0.43

112.31

1.01 4/12/2006 14:14

11.38

0.36

118.29

1.01 4/12/2006 14:16

11.45

0.39

126.12

1.04 4/12/2006 14:18

11.24

0.40

133.32

2.41 4/12/2006 14:20

12.23

0.40

150.89

2.46 4/12/2006 14:22

13.16

0.38

169.73

2.63 4/12/2006 14:24

13.90

0.41

180.77

2.65 4/12/2006 14:26

15.54

0.39

215.69

2.73 4/12/2006 14:28

16.27

0.44

226.69

3.46 4/12/2006 14:30

17.58

0.41

250.03

3.57 4/12/2006 14:32

18.94

0.40

268.25

4.04 4/12/2006 14:34

19.04

0.54

275.91

4.04 4/12/2006 14:36

16.43

0.42

197.54

2.45 4/12/2006 14:38

19.58

0.60

207.02

2.55 4/12/2006 14:40

19.31

0.57

209.23

2.54 4/12/2006 14:42

18.51

0.56

198.88

2.58 4/12/2006 14:44

18.23

0.45

193.18

2.48 4/12/2006 14:46

18.25

0.40

188.84

2.55 4/12/2006 14:48

17.70

0.42

186.58

2.55 4/12/2006 14:50

17.36

0.42

185.80

2.55 4/12/2006 14:52

17.32

0.39

193.22

2.55 4/12/2006 14:54

17.28

0.42

196.10

2.59 4/12/2006 14:56

17.44

0.38

200.46

2.60 4/12/2006 14:•J8

18.48

0.47

213.26

2.65 4/12/2006 15:00

18.50

0.41

218.75

2.69 4/12/2006 15:02

15.51

0.39

176.92

2.43 4/12/2006 15:04

16.64

0.39

171.88

2.53 4/12/2006 15:06

17.33

&44

176.10

2.68 4/12/2006 15:08

16.71

0.42

175.92

2.56 Averages 15.44

0.42

176.68

2.35

8.86 7.83989 12.20 13.51 13.65 13.92 14.27 13.63 7.04 1.26 0.75 4.13 7.04 7.44 9.04 10.60 11.25 11.67 11.88 11.57 11.65 11.68 11.94 11.46 11.13 11.15 10.20 9.74 10.67 10.75 10.04

0.410.49 0.53 0.52 0,470.46 0.460.460.46 0.36 0.12 0.110.29 0.45 0.45 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.410.42 0.410.410.38 0.39 0.37 0.39 0.41

26.63 25.34 33.41 35.67 35.39 31.47 35.00 31.74 31.96 15.00 3.962.359.94 20,72 23.90 29.77 32.52 32.13 32.63 31.05 30.24 28,02 31.60 25.26 27.73 25.33 24.70 21.14 20.25 22.08 22.96 25.62

1.071.011.13 1.08 1.00 0.971.131.011.110.44 0.13 0.12 0.45 0.63 0.92 0.991.02 1.04 1.06 1.05 1.05 0.94 1.12 0.891.06 0.990.98 0.57 0.54 0.60 0.610.86acme3 Imacc

Quant Method: filename C:\l\Methods\ACME3.method shift Information: shift-reference

Z:\Methods\hf-150.spa start 4000 stop 4300 maxdela# 10 interpolate-count

10 shift-count 10 Quant Information: digit-tolerance

3 data-size-tolerance 5 use-dynamic-references true use-bias false use-radiance false report-zero true References: set-filename Acetaldehyde, co2,HF, SF6, H20,Hcl, Z:\Methods\Acetaldehyde 22.4 ppm 770_1_185.SPA z:\Methods\co2-2Ok.spa Z:\Methods\HF6.0ppm.spa Z:\Methods\SF6_384.SPA Z:\Methods\h2o5%-78m. SPA Z:\Linearity Sets\Hcl\hcl-lppm-25C.SPA code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde

22.4 ppm 1 co2

co2-20k

760

185

20000 HF HF6.0ppm

650

185

6 SF6 SF6_384

750

185

101 H20 h2o5%-78m 755

185

50000 HCl hcl-1ppm-25C 760

185

1 770_1_185 770

185

22.4 i0 25.13°878I0 Regions:
start

stop

report

i nterference 710.41 1131.05

CO2 724.42 737.21 744.65 773.44 788.47 832.25 911.07 957.94 964.00 991.97 823.45 2935.13

SF6 913.95 961o81 857.01 2500.00

H20 857.01 971.54 1997.73 2143.12 2569.69 2999.80

HCl 2675.39 2678.59 2700.43 2703.63 2725.34 2728.65 2748.91 2754.66 2770.87 2778.19

H20

CO2,H20

H20

Page 12796.13 2799.85 3433,73 4267.35 4037°96 4039°79 4074.43 4076o10 4108o95 4110.89 4140.96 4175.21

HF acme3 H20

Linearity:
name CO2 order 4 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 0.58864,2.16232e-OO6,-5oO3205e-O13,-8.90641e-019 setname co2 References: set-filename

C:\IMACC

software\Linearity sets\co2\co2_lOM_high H20.set Z:\Methods\co2-1.spa Z:\Methods\co2-20.spa Z:\Methods\co2-150.spa Z:\Methods\Co2-2OO.spa Z:\Methods\co2_lk.spa Z:\Methods\co2-5kaspa Z:\Methods\CO2-1Ok.spa c02 Z:\Methods\co2-2Ok.spa CO2 Z:\Methods\co2-1OOk.spa Z:\Methods\co2_10%ospa code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m)

c02C02 co2-1

760

185

1

10 c02-20 760

185

20

10 c02-150 760

185

150

10 co2-200 760

185

200

10 co2_1k 760

185

1000

10 co2-5k 760

185

5000

10 c02-10k 760

185

10000 10 c02-20k 760

185

20000 10 co2-100k 650

185

le+005 4.2 C02_10% 650

185

le+005 7.2 Linearity:
name H20 order 3 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 0.874796,3o15436e-O05,-3.55824e-011 setname H20 References: set-filename

C:\IMACC

software\Linearity H20, Z:\Methods\H201%-78m.spa H20, Z:\Methods\13.90%H20.spa H20, Z:\Methods\H202%-78m.spa H20, Z:\Methods\H203%-78m.spa Page 2

Sets\H20-78m\H20-10m.setcodeH20H20H20H20 acme3 shortname pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) H201%-78m 755

185

10000 78 13.90%H20 758

185 1.39e+005 10.3 H202%-78m 755

185

20000 78 H203%-78m 755

185

30000 78

10o 3

24.7 Linearity:
name

Hcl order 4 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 1.33261,0.O00881044,'1.87083e-006,-5o0028e-010 setname HCl References: set-filename

C:\IMACC

Software\Linearity Sets\HCl\HCl-High H20°set Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCl\HCL

0.12 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

SynthetiCoSPA Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCI\HCL

0.49 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\Linearity SetS\HCI\HCL

1.24 ppm 10o3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\L1nearlty SetS\HCI\HCl

3.1ppm

10°3m 760_185C

Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\Llnear•ty

Sets\HCl\HCL

4.95 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•near•ty

SetS\HCI\HCl

13o2 ppm 10.3 m 689_185C.SPA Hcl Z:\L•near•ty

Sets\HCI\HCl

15.5ppm

10.3m 760_185C

Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•nearlty

SetS\HCI\HCl

24°7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•nearlty

Sets\HCI\HCl

25 ppm 760_10.3_185

SBS.SPA Z:\L•near•ty SetS\HCl\HCl

25 ppm 760_10.3_185

SBS2°SPA HCl Z:\L•nearlty

Sets\HCI\HCl

31ppm 10.3m 760_185C

Synthetic.SPA Z:\L•near•ty Sets\HCI\HCl

40 ppm 10.3 m 769_185C.SPA Hcl Z:\Linearity

Sets\HCI\HCl

49.5 ppm 10.3m 650t_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\Linearity SetS\HCI\HCl

78ppm 10.3m 760_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCI\HCl

123.7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl_50ppm.spa Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl

247.5 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl_100ppm.spa Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl

371 ppm 10.3m 650t_185C

Synthetic.SPA Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl

495 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl 91.3 ppm SF6 60 ppm 172C_68.5_850t

SBS.SPA Z:\Methods\HCl_500ppm.spa code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m)
10.3 10.3 10° 3 10.310° 3

10.3 HCL 0.12 ppm 10°3m 650_185C

Synthetic 650

185

0.12 HCL 0.49 ppm 10°3m 650_185C

Synthetic 650

185

0.49 HCL 1°24 ppm 10°3m 650_185C

synthetic 650

185

1.24 Hcl 3,1ppm

10.3m 760±185C

synthetic 760

185

3.1 Hcl HCL 4.95 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

synthetic 650

185

4.95 HCl HCl 13.2 ppm 10.3 m 689_185C

689

185

13.2 HCl Hcl 15.5ppm

10.3m 760_185C

Synthetic 760

185

15.5 Hcl HCl 24.7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

Synthetic 650

185 10.3 Hcl Hcl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185

SBS

773

185

25 Page 3iO•

3 iOo 3

10.3 49.5

123.7
247°5
371

91.3 10.3

10.3

10.3 acme3 HCl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185

SBS2

773

185

25 760 185

31 185 40 650 185 760 185

78 650 185 50 25.5 650 185 100 25.5 650 185 650 185

495 852 172 25,5 Hcl HCl 31ppm 10.3m 760_185C

Synthetic HCl 40 ppm 10o3 m 769_185C

769 HCl Hcl 49•5 ppm 10o3m 650t_185C

Synthetic 10o3 Hcl 78ppm 10o3m 760_185C

synthetic Hcl 123o7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

synthetic 10o3 HCl_5Oppm 650

185 Hcl 247.5 ppm 10.3m 650_185C

synthetic 10.3 HCl_lOOppm 650

185 Hcl 371 ppm 10•3m 650t_185C

synthetic 10.3 HCl 495 ppm 10o3m 650_185C

Synthetic HCl 91.3 ppm SF6 60 ppm 172C_68•5_850t

SBS 68.5 HCl_5OOppm 650

185

500 Linearity:
name HF order 3 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 0.689127,O.O0254714,1.56567e-006 setname HF References: set-filename

C:\IMACC

Software\Linearity SetS\HF\HF•set HF, Z:\Methods\hf-lO.spa z:\Methods\hf-25.spa HF, Z:\Methods\HF

301 ppm 650_1_185C.SPA HF, Z:\Methods\HF

500.0 ppm 760_1_185C.SPA HF, z:\Methods\hf-150.spa Z:\Methods\hf-2OO.spa Z:\Methods\hf-25Ouspa code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m)

HF hf-lO

760

185

10 hf-25 760

185

25 HF HF 301 ppm 650_1_185C 650

185 HF HF 500.0 ppm 760_1_185C 760

185 HF hf-150

760

185

150 hf-200 760

185

200 hf-250 760

185

250 301 5OO

i0i0
I0i0i0

1 1

Bi as

Page 4