alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333- 81741 of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April 16, 2004(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the entity’s change in method of accounting for intangible assets) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perry Ellis International, Inc.for the year ended January 31, 2004. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Miami, Florida 

April 16, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Larry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal Management, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: February 2, 2005               /s/ Robert C. Larry
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert C. Larry
                                     Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                     Financial Officer
# C_2023288EN.01000201.xml

| 17.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 August 2023

(2023/C 288/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0916 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 159,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4520 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85645 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,8280 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9605 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,4530 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,060 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 385,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4528 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9358 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,5411 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6895 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4726 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5466 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8282 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4822 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 461,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,8671 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9657 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 685,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0536 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,852 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,599 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4276 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6429 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,8435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0916

JPY

Japanese yen

159,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4520

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85645

SEK

Swedish krona

11,8280

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9605

ISK

Iceland króna

144,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,4530

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,060

HUF

Hungarian forint

385,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4528

RON

Romanian leu

4,9358

TRY

Turkish lira

29,5411

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6895

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4726

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5466

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8282

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4822

KRW

South Korean won

1 461,11

ZAR

South African rand

20,8671

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9657

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 685,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0536

PHP

Philippine peso

61,852

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,599

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4276

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6429

INR

Indian rupee

90,8435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,250<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                     3,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,596
<PP&E>                                           5,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,954
<BONDS>                                          1,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,105
<SALES>                                         15,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,643
<CGS>                                            7,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,425
<INCOME-TAX>                                       441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<FN>
<F1>Certain information in the financial data schedule above has been condensed 
for interim financial reporting pursuant to the rules and regulations of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 252.220 Debt-to-equity limits for U.S. bank holding companies. ( a ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Debt-to-equity ratio* means the ratio of a company's total liabilities to a company's total equity capital less goodwill.
( 2 ) *Debt* and *equity* have the same meaning as “total liabilities” and “total equity capital,” respectively, as reported by a bank holding company on the FR Y-9C.
( b ) *Notice and maximum debt-to-equity ratio requirement.* The Council, or the Board on behalf of the Council, will provide written notice to a bank holding company to the extent that the Council makes a determination, pursuant to section 165(j) of the Dodd-Frank Act, that a bank holding company poses a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States and that the imposition of a debt-to-equity requirement is necessary to mitigate such risk. Beginning no later than 180 days after receiving written notice from the Council or from the Board on behalf of the Council, the bank holding company must achieve and maintain a debt-to-equity ratio of no more than 15-to-1.
( c ) *Extension.* The Board may, upon request by the bank holding company for which the Council has made a determination pursuant to section 165(j) of the Dodd-Frank Act, extend the time period for compliance established under paragraph (b) of this section for up to two additional periods of 90 days each, if the Board determines that the identified company has made good faith efforts to comply with the debt-to-equity ratio requirement and that each extension would be in the public interest. Requests for an extension must be received in writing by the Board not less than 30 days prior to the expiration of the existing time period for compliance and must provide information sufficient to demonstrate that the bank holding company has made good faith efforts to comply with the debt-to-equity ratio requirement and that each extension would be in the public interest.
( d ) *Termination.* The debt-to-equity ratio requirement in paragraph (b) of this section shall cease to apply to a bank holding company as of the date it receives notice from the Council of a determination that the bank holding company no longer poses a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States and that the imposition of a debt-to-equity requirement is no longer necessary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         910,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              122,040,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,390,000
<INVENTORY>                                 53,519,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           182,348,000
<PP&E>                                     215,545,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,719,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             640,012,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      445,064,000
<BONDS>                                    207,602,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,109,000
<COMMON>                                       518,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 180,627,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               640,012,000
<SALES>                                    455,683,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           455,683,000
<CGS>                                      414,166,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              414,166,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            46,705,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          21,003,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,638,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,291,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (34,929,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (34,929,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0129 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM105AD

84 - 32 - 100 --- 8/15/12 RD 8/4 - 32 - 0160, I5 --- 5/30/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
§ 308.33 Public hearings. ( a ) *General rule.* All hearings must be open to the public, unless the FDIC, in its discretion, determines that holding an open hearing would be contrary to the public interest. Within 20 days of service of the notice or, in the case of change-in-control proceedings under section 7(j)(4) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(4)), within 20 days from service of the hearing order, any respondent may file with the Administrative Officer a request for a private hearing, and any party may file a reply to such a request. A party must serve on the ALJ a copy of any request or reply the party files with the Administrative Officer. The form of, and procedure for, these requests and replies are governed by § 308.23. A party's failure to file a request or a reply constitutes a waiver of any objections regarding whether the hearing will be public or private.
( b ) *Filing document under seal.* Enforcement Counsel, in Enforcement Counsel's discretion, may file any document or part of a document under seal if disclosure of the document would be contrary to the public interest. The ALJ will take all appropriate steps to preserve the confidentiality of such documents or parts thereof, including closing portions of the hearing to the public.
#### § 263.4 Authority of the Board.

The Board may, at any time during the pendency of a proceeding, perform, direct the performance of, or waive performance of, any act which could be done or ordered by the ALJ.
# C_2017002EN.01000402.xml

| 5.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 16 December 2015

in Case E-18/15

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

v

(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2010/65/EU on reporting formalities for ships)

(2017/C 2/05)

APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of the Act referred to at point 56l of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States and repealing Directive 2002/6/EC) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 16 December 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of the Act referred to at point 56l of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States and repealing Directive 2002/6/EC) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of the Act referred to at point 56l of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States and repealing Directive 2002/6/EC) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
#### § 308.178 Statement of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by a statement fully documenting the fees and expenses for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in work in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services performed. The administrative law judge or the Board of Directors may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
<Page>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.5


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elephant & Castle Group Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 26, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Bryant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            s/Richard Bryant
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Richard Bryant
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            President

Dated: March 24, 2005
#### § 263.301 Purpose.

Section 39 of the FDI Act requires the Board to establish safety and soundness standards. Pursuant to section 39, a bank may be required to submit a compliance plan if it is not in compliance with a safety and soundness standard established by guideline under section 39(a) or (b). An enforceable order under section 8 may be issued if, after being notified that it is in violation of a safety and soundness standard established under section 39, the bank fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan. This subpart establishes procedures for requiring submission of a compliance plan and issuing an enforceable order pursuant to section 39.
42411, 42412, 42413, 42414.

#### ALLSTATE LEASING CORPORATION v. SAMPLES et al. (two cases); and vice versa.

Frankum, Judge.

The errors enumerated by the appellant in the main appeal in each of these cases are, in substance, that the court erred in rendering “a verdict” in favor of the defendants and erred in refusing to admit testimony of a named witness. Each main appeal specifies those portions of the record to be omitted by the clerk in transmitting the record to this court. The transcript of the evidence adduced upon the trial is not specified to be omitted in either case, but no transcript has been sent to this court. Under the general presumption that public officials perform all of their duties , as required by law, it will be presumed that the clerk has transmitted to this court everything of file in his office and pertaining to these cases, except those things specified to be omitted.

The suit in each case was on a contract of guaranty, wherein *214the liability of the defendants was predicated upon a default by the principal obligor in the performance of the principal contract. Without the transcripts of the evidence it is impossible for this court to ascertain whether the plaintiff, in either case, proved its right to recover by showing a default by the principal obligor or not. Accordingly, the judgments appealed from in the main appeals will be affirmed. See *Davis v. Davis,*222 Ga. 579 (151 SE2d 123).

*Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*

Argued November 8, 1966

Decided February 3, 1967

Rehearing denied February 14, 1967.

*Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, Robert J. Castellani, J. Timothy White,*for appellant.

*Telford, Wayne & Greer, Joe K. Telford,*for appellees.

*Judgments on main appeals affirmed; cross appeals dismissed.*
UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q/A
March 31, 1999

EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                            ------------------
(Unaudited - Dollars in millions)                           1999          1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                              $ 48.5        $134.4
  Add:  Fixed charges                                       19.7          14.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings as adjusted                                      $ 68.2        $148.6
==============================================================================
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                        $ 16.8        $ 11.7
  Interest portion of rent expense                           2.9           2.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                                       $ 19.7        $ 14.2
==============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           3.5          10.5
==============================================================================

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income before income taxes and fixed charges.  Fixed charges
consist of interest expense and the estimated interest portion of rent expense.