alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASA International Ltd.
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alfred C. Angelone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Alfred C. Angelone
----------------------
Alfred C. Angelone
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 13, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 08, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 08, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0189. TIMOTHY LLOYD v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014R632
#### § 3.405 Relation to other actions.

In lieu of, or in addition to, the procedures in this subpart, the required minimum capital ratios for a national bank or Federal savings association may be established or revised through a written agreement or cease and desist proceedings under 12 U.S.C. 1818 (b) or (c) (12 CFR part 19) or as a condition for approval of an application.

[78 FR 62269, Oct. 11, 2013, as amended at 88 FR 89842, Dec. 28, 2023]
§ 310.11 Fees. The Corporation, upon a request for records disclosable pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), shall charge a fee of $0.10 per page for duplicating, except as follows: ( a ) If the Corporation determines that it can grant access to a record only by providing a copy of the record, no fee will be charged for providing the first copy of the record or any portion thereof;
( b ) Whenever the aggregate fees computed under this section do not exceed $10 for any one request, the fee will be deemed waived by the Corporation; or
( c ) Whenever the Corporation determines that a reduction or waiver is warranted, it may reduce or waive any fees imposed for furnishing requested information pursuant to this section.
[40 FR 46274, Oct. 6, 1975, as amended at 61 FR 43420, Aug. 23, 1996]
#### §§ 3.137-3.140 [Reserved]
# C_2015193EN.01000701.xml

| 11.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/7

---

State aid — Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State

(2015/C 193/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has proposed appropriate measures, which were accepted by Norway, on the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 4 February 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Decision number | : | 36/15/COL |
| Case number | : | 70337 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | Publicly owned hospital pharmacies in Norway |
| Legal basis | : | The Norwegian State Budget 2015 (Prop. 1 LS (2014-2015)) and the Norwegian Tax Act Section 2-30 |
| Objective | : | n.a. |
| Economic sectors | : | Pharmacies |
| Other information | : | Based on the measures undertaken by the Norwegian authorities to amend the financial regime of the public hospital pharmacies in Norway, the Authority’s concerns regarding the incompatibility of the financial regime with the EEA Agreement are dispelled. The Authority concludes that there are no grounds for pursuing the matter further and has consequently decided to close the case. |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

4 February 2015

Decision number

Decision number

:

36/15/COL

Case number

Case number

:

70337

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

Title

:

Publicly owned hospital pharmacies in Norway

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Norwegian State Budget 2015 (Prop. 1 LS (2014-2015)) and the Norwegian Tax Act Section 2-30

Objective

Objective

:

n.a.

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Pharmacies

Other information

Other information

:

Based on the measures undertaken by the Norwegian authorities to amend the financial regime of the public hospital pharmacies in Norway, the Authority’s concerns regarding the incompatibility of the financial regime with the EEA Agreement are dispelled. The Authority concludes that there are no grounds for pursuing the matter further and has consequently decided to close the case.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
42192.

#### HALE v. SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

Felton, Chief Judge.

In this action by a named insured against her insurer to recover under the medical payments provisions of her automobile insurance policy, which excluded coverage of non-owned automobiles “furnished for the regular use” of the insured, the evidence showed that the automobile in question belonged to plaintiff’s sister-in-law, who had given plaintiff and her husband its keys in May of 1966, making it available for an indefinite time for their unrestricted use and that, although their actual use of the automobile was rather infrequent, they nevertheless enjoyed continuous, uninterrupted possession of it with the privilege and opportunity of its use at such times and for such purposes as they wished up *30through the date of the collision, August 25, 1965. Under the holding in *Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Falls,*114 Ga. App. 812, the exclusionary clause was applicable to the automobile in question; therefore, the court did not err in its judgment sustaining the defendant insurer's motion for a summary judgment.

*Frankum and 'Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Argued September 8, 1966

Decided January 13, 1967.

*Mar son C. Dunaway, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, W. E. Davidson, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. STEVEN ORVILLE CUPP, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson,District Judge. (5:00-cr-30072-sgw-mfu-1; 5:08-cv-80086-sgwmfu)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Orville Cupp seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion as untimely filed. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cupp has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3068

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUSRet.) John H. McLain Post Office’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3068

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as

the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain

Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3068 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS5 Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain

11 Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2022487EN.01000701.xml

| 22.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 487/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 487/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2022

(2022/C 487/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0636 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4380 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87651 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0623 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9836 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4309 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,218 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 402,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6665 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8937 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,8541 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4475 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2902 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6850 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4366 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 367,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,3529 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4219 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5419 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 573,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7197 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,556 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,907 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4913 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9919 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,1090 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0636

JPY

Japanese yen

140,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4380

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87651

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0623

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9836

ISK

Iceland króna

152,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4309

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,218

HUF

Hungarian forint

402,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6665

RON

Romanian leu

4,8937

TRY

Turkish lira

19,8541

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4475

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2902

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6850

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4366

KRW

South Korean won

1 367,63

ZAR

South African rand

18,3529

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4219

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5419

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 573,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7197

PHP

Philippine peso

58,556

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,907

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4913

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9919

INR

Indian rupee

88,1090

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
42561.

#### SHARPTON v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The trial judge rendered an order sustaining defendant’s special demurrers to the petition provid*434ing that “plaintiff’s petition shall stand dismissed unless amended within . . . (45) days.” Within the time allowed plaintiff amended her petition, and thereafter defendant filed a “motion for order suggesting of record automatic dismissal of plaintiff’s petition,” objecting that the amendment was not sufficient to meet the demurrers. *Held:*

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Submitted January 6, 1967

Decided March 17, 1967.

*Murray C. Underwood, J. Sidney Lanier,*for appellant.

*Bryan, Carter, Ansley & Smith, M. D. McLendon,*for appellee.

Under an order like the one in this case, the petition is automatically dismissed if the plaintiff fails to amend within the time allowed. *Clark v. Ganson,*144 Ga. 544 (1) (87 SE 670); *Smith v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.,*181 Ga. 479 (2) (182 SE 603); *Howell v. Fulton Bag &c. Mills,*188 Ga. 488, 490 (4 SE2d 181). The provision for dismissal is operative even if the plaintiff files an amendment, where the amendment fails to cure the defects pointed out by the demurrers. *Speer v. Alexander,*149 Ga. 765 (102 SE 150); *Gamble v. Gamble,*193 Ga. 591 (19 SE2d 276); *Hayes v. Simpson,*83 Ga. App. 22, 26 (62 SE2d 441). However, on the necessity of defendant’s pointing out specifically wherein and why the amendment was not sufficient, as defendant did in this case, see *International Harvester Co. v. Adams,*135 Ga. 104 (1) (68 SE 1093); *Perkins v. First Nat. Bank,*221 Ga. 82, 94 (143 SE2d 474); *Ocmulgee Electric Membership Corp. v. Taylor & Son, Inc.,*115 Ga. App. 44 (2, 3) (153 SE2d 666). With respect to certain allegations to which demurrers had been sustained, the amendment here was substantially no more than a reiteration of those allegations, and therefore it clearly failed to meet the objections raised by the demurrers. *Baker v. City of Atlanta,*22 Ga. App. 483 (96 SE 332); *Garmany v. Henson,*30 Ga. App. 100 (1 a) (117 SE 107). The trial court did not err in sustaining defendant’s motion and thus effecting dismissal of the case pursuant to the previous order on the demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF EPHREN TAYLOR



IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF CITY CAPITAL CORPORATION (COMPANY) ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (REPORT), THE UNDERSIGNED, IN THE CAPACITY AND ON THE DATE INDICATED BELOW, HEREBY CERTIFIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350), THAT TO HIS KNOWLEDGE:



1.            THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND



2.            THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.





DATED: NOVEMBER 14, 2006



/S/ EPHREN TAYLOR

EPHREN TAYLOR

CEO/SECRETARY/TREASURER

(principal executive/financial officer)
Order filed, August 17, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00540

- CV

____________ FELIX P. BABAUTA , Appellant

V.

DEBRA V. JENNINGS AN D RALPAHELL V. WILKI NS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

H arris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 23475



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 08, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen DeShetler , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
§ 210.11 Availability of proceeds of noncash items; time schedule. ( a ) *Availability of credit.* A Reserve Bank shall give credit to the sender for the proceeds of a noncash item when it receives payment in actually and finally collected funds (or advice from another Reserve Bank of such payment to it). The amount of the item is counted toward the balance maintained to satisfy a reserve balance requirement for purposes of part 204 of this chapter (Regulation D) and becomes available for use by the sender when the Reserve Bank receives the payment or advice, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Time schedule.* A Reserve Bank may give credit for the proceeds of a noncash item subject to payment in actually and finally collected funds in accordance with a published time schedule. The time schedule shall indicate when the proceeds of the noncash item will be counted toward the balance maintained to satisfy a reserve balance requirement for purposes of part 204 of this chapter (Regulation D) and become available for use by the sender. A Reserve Bank may, however, refuse at any time to permit the use of credit given by it for a noncash item for which the Reserve Bank has not yet received payment in actually and finally collected funds.
[Reg. J, 77 FR 21858, Apr. 12, 2012, as amended at 83 FR 61521, Nov. 30, 2018]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JerryC. Atkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Jerry C. Atkin      |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |   |
| Jerry  C. Atkin          |   |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |   |
| May 7,  2010        |   |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 08, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 08, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0189. TIMOTHY LLOYD v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014R632
# C_2023230EN.01002001.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/20

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 June 2023

(2023/C 230/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0938 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4476 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,8175 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9783 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,686 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 370,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4485 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9638 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,4788 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6480 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4503 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5713 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7937 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4790 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,4645 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9140 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 408,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1097 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,460 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,928 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3006 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6836 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,7065 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0938

JPY

Japanese yen

157,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4476

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86400

SEK

Swedish krona

11,8175

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9783

ISK

Iceland króna

149,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,686

HUF

Hungarian forint

370,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4485

RON

Romanian leu

4,9638

TRY

Turkish lira

28,4788

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6480

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4503

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5713

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7937

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4790

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,77

ZAR

South African rand

20,4645

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9140

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 408,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1097

PHP

Philippine peso

60,460

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,928

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3006

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6836

INR

Indian rupee

89,7065

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 24, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0366. WENDY RITGER, IN HER CAPACITY AS CONSERVATORY OF THOMAS RUSSELL WHYTE v. BRADLEY WHYTE, AS TRUSTEE et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2020000017
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                       -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Calypte Biomedical Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-16769) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-38417) on Form
S-3 of Calypte Biomedical Corporation of our report dated February 20, 1998
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Calypte Biomedical Corporation
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997 and for the period
from February 18, 1988 (inception) through December 31, 1997, which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Calypte
Biomedical Corporation.

                                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Francisco, California
March 23, 1998