alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,589,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 16,627,978
<COMMON>                                        13,022
<OTHER-SE>                                (71,521,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,589,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,106,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (59,630,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (62,626,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.21)
        

</TABLE>
SI 0-101220-005 

^o^^\ 

Culebra, Puerto Rioo 

Deconber 10,2010 

Btngl)}' Bock ^at-P-(!g 

"fttttienbo a Amsttvi ClitntM taSa 1080" 

P.O. Box 34, Culebra PR 00775 

Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary US Depattraent of TranspcMtation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. 

Washington D.C. 20S90 

RE: Document ID: DOT-OST-2010-0260-0001 

Application of Air Charter, Inc. dba Air Flamenco 

Deu-Mr.Ltdiood, 

It's with my outmost reqiect that I write this letter in hopes that you will consider favorable the 

petiticHi made by the above mentioned company with regards to their q^lication. Air Flamenco 

is a local family owned small business tibat has been providing the local Culebra community with 

the very much needed air transportation for many years. Not only has it made life much easier 

and conveni«it for us locals to travel to the big island of Ptntto Rico, but it's also one of the 

backbones of the local tourism businesses on the Island of Culebra. 

Tourism is our mayor economic livelihood and as an owner of a small restaurant business I can 

assure you that we have been significantly hurt economically by the sudden shutdown of this 

airline. We (over 50 small businesses) ^epeoA deeply on the amount of people that they transport 

from the big island every day to Culebra in ordor to stay in business. There could be no greater 

need for their normal operation as we enter the holiday season and the winter months where many 

US residents travel to our island in search of warmtii and relaxation. I can again assure you that 

our economic losses will be great. The actual economic situation as you know is quite delicate 

and we can't allow situations like this one to create a greater hardship <ya the economy and small 

businesses. Our President has very much qx^ n out about giving Small Businesses all the help 

and opportunities available to them because we are one of the mayor players in the countries 

econcMnic recovery. 

Your pofihive and quick response to this above mentioned petttioa will help ^Sa/t hundreds of U.S. 

residents that live on the snudl island of Culebra that depend directly or indirectly to the qxration 

of this company to retain their jobs and bunnesses, and will be forever grateful. Thank you in 

advance for your ccmunitment and support in (he above matters. 

Rflgpaetgitly Vniim 

NefhKomero 

ProfMietor 

Cc: Air Flamenco 

Culebra Business Assoc. 

l U . (787) 742-0233 • Fax (787) 742-0085 • Cd . (787) 556-6673 / 787-340^)061 

email: cuIebradd@yahoo.com
4

Kiakakrorak

R iver K o gosukruk R iv er 

Fish

Creek 

Judy

C re ek 

41 40 42 

9 N 

45 43 44 W 

Tu nalik

River 

To pag oruk 

Inaru River 

Kuk Riv er 

Co l v il e 

Ikpikpuk 

River 

Meade 

Col v i ll e 

Meade River 

River 

River 

Ri v e r 

R i v e r 

Maybe Creek 

Titaluk River 

Anaktuvuk 

Pass 

Harr ison

Bay 

Be au fo rt Se a 

Dease Inlet 

Peard ay 

Ch uk ch i Se a 

Kasegaluk 

Lagoon 

uge 

Liz-C 

12 11 19 18 21 20

12 11 17 16 22 21

38 37 36 

4 3

14 

10 

13 

4 4 

3 3

6 

5 

9 N 

Atigaru Po

Cape

B

A R C T I C O C E A N Barrow 

Point Barrow

Barrow 23

22

Walakpa Bay 21

Tangent Point 

mpson Camp Lonel

Pitt t 

y 20

Cape Si Point Franklin 19

Point Belcher Poin 18

Admiral Smith Bay Bay ty 17

Halkett

Wainwrigh Si 17t 16

32

mpson 15 N

30 W 31 16 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 15 N 1 W 15 N 17 16 15 W 14 13 4 3 2 10 9 8 7 6 5

Teshekpuk Lake 

14

int Oliktok Point

Atqasuk 14

Icy Cape 13

13 12

10

12 12

Prudhoe Bay

Deadhorse

11

11

10

11

Nui t 39

8 35 34 33 qsu

Inigok 

6

15 32 31 10 30 W 12 13 29 14

7 28 27 26 25 24 9 N

1 E 23 9 N

15 W 20 19 18 2 3 4 14 13 10 9 8 7 5 2 1 W 8

6

8 8

5

Point Lay 7

6 7 7

4

6 5

3

5 4

2

1 N 3 46 45 W 44 43 42 41 40 39 2 38 37 1 S 36 35 34 33 1 N

30 W 2 2 17 32 31 29 12 13 28

7 8 27 26 25 1 N 1

15 W 1 E

2 24 23 22 21 20 19 2 3 4 18 17 16 3 2 1 W

Umia 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4t 1 S

3

1 S

2 1 S

Umiat 4

2

3 2

5

4

6

5

7

l

3 3

Arctic 4 4

5 5

National 23 24

7 8 S 6

46 45 W 44 43 6 42 6 41 40 39 7

GAS 22

l

9

POSSIBLE OIL AND 38 37 36 35 34 STAGING FACILIT33 IES32

21

Wi dlif 8 S 7 7 17 31 30 We 29 28 27 26 25 24 8 N 8 S 7 8 9 10

10 23 22 21 20 19 18 15 W 1 E 2 3 4 5 6 17 16 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 W

9

Ref 11

Known Oil Field Pipeline 12

Known Gas F Trans-A

10 

9 9 10

ield laska Pipeline 10 10

11

34

11 11

Na 33 tive Corporation Surface Ownership 12

12 UMIAT MERIDIAN 12 34

KATEEL MERIDIAN 32

Possible Future St ing Facilit

i

34

ag y 13 33 18 17 16 15 E

31 N

Prev

30

14 33

ious 13 12 11 ly Occupi

i

ed 1S0 ng8 Fac

7 t ilit 14 32

ag9 y

6 5 4 1 E 32 3 2 1 W 31 N 2 3 15

Pu2m9 p St t 4 5 6 7 15 E 8 9 10 a on 11 12 13 14 31 N 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

0 6 12 18

M

16 30

iles 28 30

29

27 29

Source: USDOI BLM and MMS 1998

Map 3-44. Locations of Possible Oil and Gas Staging Facilities in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska 

10 11 

10 

16 

11 

17 18 19 20 

14 

21 22 23 

15 

24 25 

16 

26 

18 19 20 21 

11 

22 23 

12 

24 25 

13 

26 27 

14 15 16 18 19 20 

25 26 27 

5 6 7 8 9 

5 6 9 

36 

37 

9 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16
§ 252.154 Risk-based and leverage capital requirements for foreign banking organizations with combined U.S. assets of $100 billion or more. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) A foreign banking organization subject to this subpart more must certify to the Board that it meets capital adequacy standards on a consolidated basis that are established by its home-country supervisor and that are consistent with the regulatory capital framework published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, as amended from time to time (Basel Capital Framework).
( 2 ) In the event that a home-country supervisor has not established capital adequacy standards that are consistent with the Basel Capital Framework, the foreign banking organization must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Board that it would meet or exceed capital adequacy standards at the consolidated level that are consistent with the Basel Capital Framework were it subject to such standards.
( b ) *Reporting.* A foreign banking organization subject to this subpart must provide to the Board reports relating to its compliance with the capital adequacy measures described in paragraph (a) of this section concurrently with filing the FR Y-7Q.
( c ) *Noncompliance with the Basel Capital Framework.* If a foreign banking organization does not satisfy the requirements of this section, the Board may impose requirements, conditions, or restrictions relating to the activities or business operations of the U.S. operations of the foreign banking organization. The Board will coordinate with any relevant State or Federal regulator in the implementation of such requirements, conditions, or restrictions. If the Board determines to impose one or more requirements, conditions, or restrictions under this paragraph, the Board will notify the organization before it applies any requirement, condition, or restriction, and describe the basis for imposing such requirement, condition, or restriction. Within 14 calendar days of receipt of a notification under this paragraph, the organization may request in writing that the Board reconsider the requirement, condition, or restriction. The Board will respond in writing to the organization's request for reconsideration prior to applying the requirement, condition, or restriction.
[Reg. YY, 79 FR 17326, Mar. 27, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 59116, Nov. 1, 2019]
#### STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION et al., v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COM. et al.

No. 31133.

Feb. 15, 1944.

*146 P. 2d 109.*

*594H. R. Palmer and Looney, Watts, Fen-ton & Eberle, all of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

B. A. Hamilton, of Tulsa, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

ARNOLD, J..

This is an original proceeding brought by the State Highway Commission and its insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, hereinafter referred to as petitioners, to review an award for permanent total disability made to the respondent W. M. Murphy.

On the 28th day of June, 1931, respondent filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment when he fell and injured his neck and head, arm and both knees on May 13, 1931, while employed as maintenance man on the highway.

On the 18th day ,of August, 1932, the State Industrial Commission entered an award for temporary total disability and disfigurement and permanent partial disability under the “other cases” provision of section 13356, O.S. 1931, 85 O.S.A. § 22, and on August 1, 1933, an agreed lump sum order was entered. Prior to entry of original award compensation for temporary total disability had been paid for 48 weeks. On July 5, 1941, respondent filed an application to reopen on the ground of change in condition resulting in total permanent disability, and following hearings the State Industrial Commission entered its award on September 3, 1943, for permanent total disability, and this proceeding is brought to review the latter award.

The sole question presented is that the statute of limitation (85 O. S. 1941 §43) has barred respondent’s right to reopen the cause. The jurisdiction of the State Industrial Commission to reopen a cause upon an application based upon the ground of change in condition and award additional compensation for permanent total disability under 85 O. S. 1941 § 22, subd. 1, extends for a period of 500 weeks from the date of the original award. The application to reopen having been filed within 500 weeks from the date of the original award entered on August 18, 1932, same was filed within time. See Upshaw v. Champlin Refining Co., 194 Okla. —, 146 P. 2d 1008.

Award affirmed.

RILEY, OSBORN, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. CORN,C.J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., dissent.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 31 , 2023.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00624

- CV

IN RE WANDA AURINI , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 276248



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 23, 2023 , relator Wanda Aurini filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, rela tor asks this court to compel the Honorable Surendran2

Pattel, presiding judge of the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County
, to vacate his July 26, 2023 orders denying relator’s motion for no

- evidence summary judgment and motion for partial traditional s ummary judgment.

Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan.
§ 308.603 Automatic removal, suspension, and debarment. ( a ) An independent public accountant or accounting firm may not perform audit services for insured depository institutions for which the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency if the accountant or firm: ( 1 ) Is subject to a final order of removal, suspension, or debarment (other than a limited scope order) issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the Office of Thrift Supervision under section 36 of the FDIA;
( 2 ) Is subject to a temporary suspension or permanent revocation of registration or a temporary or permanent suspension or bar from further association with any registered public accounting firm issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission under sections 105(c)(4)(A) or (B) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(A) or (B)); or
( 3 ) Is subject to an order of suspension or denial of the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Securities and Exchange Commission.
( b ) Upon written request, the FDIC, for good cause shown, may grant written permission to such accountant or firm to perform audit services for insured depository institutions for which the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency. The written request must comply with the requirements of § 303.3 of this chapter.
§ 3.123 Ongoing qualification. ( a ) *Changes to advanced systems.* A national bank or Federal savings association must meet all the qualification requirements in § 3.122 on an ongoing basis. A national bank or Federal savings association must notify the OCC when the national bank or Federal savings association makes any change to an advanced system that would result in a material change in the national bank's or Federal savings association's advanced approaches total risk-weighted asset amount for an exposure type or when the national bank or Federal savings association makes any significant change to its modeling assumptions.
( b ) *Failure to comply with qualification requirements.* ( 1 ) If the OCC determines that a national bank or Federal savings association that uses this subpart and that has conducted a satisfactory parallel run fails to comply with the qualification requirements in § 3.122, the OCC will notify the national bank or Federal savings association in writing of the national bank's or Federal savings association's failure to comply.
( 2 ) The national bank or Federal savings association must establish and submit a plan satisfactory to the OCC to return to compliance with the qualification requirements.
( 3 ) In addition, if the OCC determines that the national bank's or Federal savings association's advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets are not commensurate with the national bank's or Federal savings association's credit, market, operational, or other risks, the OCC may require such a national bank or Federal savings association to calculate its advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets with any modifications provided by the OCC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
BONNEVILLE PACIFIC  CORPORATION'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  ($ IN THOUSANDS)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     14,109

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,109
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  662
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,142
<PP&E>                                         2,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,734
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       73
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,767
<SALES>                                        4,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,031
<CGS>                                          5,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               93
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                 683
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,341
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .46



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 13, 2003
                                       /s/ Josephine Chaus
                                     --------------------------------
                                       Josephine Chaus
                                       Chairwoman of the Board and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-                              ( print page 52742)                            393), the Salmon-Challis National Forest's Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting which is open to the public.                    

# DATES:

Monday, October 19, 2009, beginning at 1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Public Lands Center, 1206 South Challis Street, Salmon, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review of RAC 2009 projects, possible approval of RAC project proposals, and preparing for the 2010 RAC project season. The meeting is an open public forum. Some RAC members may attend the meeting by conference call or electronically.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William A. Wood, Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at 208-756-5111.

Dated: September 30, 2009.

William A. Wood,

Forest Supervisor,  Salmon-Challis National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-24649 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
# C_2023265EN.01000901.xml

| 28.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/9

---

NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser ‘Emerging Donors’

(Grade AD 14)

in the Directorate-General International Partnerships (INTPA)

COM/2023/10438

(2023/C 265/06)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2023/10438) for the function of Principal Adviser ‘Emerging Donors’ (Grade AD 14) in the Directorate-General for International Partnerships (INTPA).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!9VhVrh

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 10, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00480

- CV

Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment sign ed by the district court on June 24, 2011. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.