alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. (“SpongeTech”) because questions have arisen regarding the accuracy of assertions in press releases to investors and in periodic reports filed with the Commission concerning, among other things: (1) The amount of sales and customer orders received by the company; (2) the company's investment agreements; and (3) the company's revenues as reported in its financial statements. In addition, SpongeTech has not filed any periodic reports with the Commission since the period ended February 28, 2009.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on October 5, 2009 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 16, 2009.                

By the Commission.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-24257 Filed 10-5-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2012307EN.01002501.xml

| 11.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/25

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 18 April 2012

in Case E-15/10

Posten Norge AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Market for business-to-consumer over-the-counter parcel delivery — Distribution network — Exclusivity agreements — Conduct liable to eliminate competition on the market — Justification — Duration of infringement — Fine)

2012/C 307/11

In Case E-15/10 Posten Norge AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for annulment of Decision No 322/10/COL of 14 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case No 34250 Norway Post/Privpak) or, in the alternative, annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 18 April 2012, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Sets the fine imposed by Article 2 of Decision No 322/10/COL of 14 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case No 34250 Norway Post/Privpak) on Posten Norge AS at EUR 11 112 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the fine imposed by Article 2 of Decision No 322/10/COL of 14 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case No 34250 Norway Post/Privpak) on Posten Norge AS at EUR 11 112 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders Posten Norge AS to bear its own costs and to pay 75 % of ESA’s costs and the costs of Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Posten Norge AS to bear its own costs and to pay 75 % of ESA’s costs and the costs of Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS;

| 4. | Orders ESA to bear the remainder of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders ESA to bear the remainder of its own costs.

---
#### § 268.202 Equal Pay Act.

Complaints alleging violations of the Equal Pay Act shall be processed under this part.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/27 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Morlex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald Barrick,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Donald Barrick
              Donald
                Barrick
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              July
                21, 2006
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-39215, 333-26153, 333-17299, 333-15181, 33-80706, 33-65756) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan of OPTi Inc. of our report dated June 26, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of OPTi Inc. included inthe Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

June 26, 2006
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 0- 10 19 3 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ _ D.C. Dock etNo. 2 :0 9- cv -0 00 79 -AAA-JEG EDWARD P. MANTURUCK, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t, ve rs us RICHAR D M. MEEKS, Geor gi a St at e Troo pe r, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 14 , 20 10 ) Befo re CARNES, M ARCUS an d HILL, Ci rcu itJu dg es .PER CURI AM:

W e h av e car efu ll y

rev ie wedth e rec or d a ndbri efs . W e co nc lu de th atth e di st ric t co ur t co rrec tl y

di sm is se d t he co m

pl ai nt . The st at em en ts of c on cl us io ns wit ho utfactav erm en ts do no t an d d idno t m eetth e p laus ib il it y

st an da rdof Ran da ll

v. Sc ot t , 61 0 F .3d70 1 (1 1 Cir . 20 10 ). th App el la ntdi d n otan d h as no t m ov edforpe rm is si on to am en d t he co m pl ai nt . No am en dm en t was fil edor p ro ffer ed . AFFIR MED.

2
#### § 1808.103 Participant not instrumentality.

No participant in the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program shall be deemed to be an agency, department, or instrumentality of the United States.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Timothy B. Page, certify that: 

 

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 of Perry Ellis International, Inc.; 

 

2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-49313] 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
# C_2021431EN.01000101.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 431/01)

Last publication

OJ C 422, 18.10.2021

Past publications

OJ C 412, 11.10.2021

OJ C 401, 4.10.2021

OJ C 391, 27.9.2021

OJ C 382, 20.9.2021

OJ C 368, 13.9.2021

OJ C 357, 6.9.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 297

    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
     and used for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

  Mr. Kind (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require any amounts remaining in a Member's Representational 
 Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury 
     and used for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL 
              ALLOWANCES TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO REDUCE 
              THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for Members' Representational Allowances for the 
House of Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 
payments are made under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited 
in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that in the case 
of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal budget deficit, such 
amounts shall be used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as the 
Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2003 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011034EN.01000501.xml

| 3.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/5

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 34/06

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 29 September 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 67278 |
| Decision number | : | 378/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged State aid granted by the Port of Reykjavík to Stáltak hf. |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) EEA |
| Type of measure | : | Purchase of shares |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

29 September 2010

Case number

:

67278

Decision number

:

378/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged State aid granted by the Port of Reykjavík to Stáltak hf.

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) EEA

Type of measure

:

Purchase of shares

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2018001EN.01000701.xml

| 4.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 July 2017

in Case E-9/16

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway

(REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) – Free movement – Restrictions procedure – Legal basis)

(REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) – Free movement – Restrictions procedure – Legal basis)

(2018/C 1/09)

In Case E-9/16, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION for a declaration that Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from the Act referred to at point 12zc of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)), as adapted under its Protocol 1, and/or its obligations under the Agreement, by maintaining in force a national provision such as Section 2-32 of the Norwegian Product Regulation which bans the manufacture, import, export and sale of consumer products containing certain concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Ása Ólafsdóttir (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 14 July 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
§ 3.162 Mechanics of risk-weighted asset calculation. ( a ) If a national bank or Federal savings association does not qualify to use or does not have qualifying operational risk mitigants, the national bank's or Federal savings association's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk is its operational risk exposure minus eligible operational risk offsets (if any).
( b ) If a national bank or Federal savings association qualifies to use operational risk mitigants and has qualifying operational risk mitigants, the national bank's or Federal savings association's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk is the greater of: ( 1 ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's operational risk exposure adjusted for qualifying operational risk mitigants minus eligible operational risk offsets (if any); or
( 2 ) 0.8 multiplied by the difference between: ( i ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's operational risk exposure; and
( ii ) Eligible operational risk offsets (if any).
( c ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's risk-weighted asset amount for operational risk equals the national bank's or Federal savings association's dollar risk-based capital requirement for operational risk determined under sections 162(a) or (b) multiplied by 12.5.
#### § 270.3 Governing principles.

As required by section 12A of the Federal Reserve Act, the time, character, and volume of all purchases and sales of obligations in the open market by Federal Reserve banks are governed with a view to accommodating commerce and business and with regard to their bearing upon the general credit situation of the country.
**Exhibit 13.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**          Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of NatuzziS.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:          The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: July 2, 2007                                       /s/ Ernesto Greco   Name:  Ernesto Greco   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   Dated: July 2, 2007                                       /s/ Filippo Simonetti   Name:  Filippo Simonetti   Title:  Chief Financial Officer             The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40811

USDC No. B-94-CV-330

__________________

GEORGE RODRIGUEZ, SR.; JOSE

RODRIGUEZ; HORTENCIA RODRIGUEZ,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LISA

GRIFFIS, Deputy U.S. Marshal; RAY

PREWETT, President, Valley AG 

Insurance Service, Incorporation; 

HERB HOOT, Insurance Coordinator, 

Valley AG Insurance Service, 

Incorporation; JANET RENO, U.S. 

Attorney General; DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION;

U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE; VALLEY AG INSURANCE

SERVICE,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

March 5, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Rodriguez, Sr., appeals from the district court's entry of summary judgment for

the defendants in a suit filed by Rodriguez and two other plaintiffs challenging a civil forfeiture. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c). Rodriguez has filed a request with this court for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. To prevail upon his IFP motion, Rodriguez must demonstrate
No. 95-40811

-2-

that he is a pauper and that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley,

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Rodriguez challenges the seizure of an insurance policy,

arguing that he was entitled to notice and a hearing prior to the cancellation of the policy and that

the policy was improperly cancelled prior to entry of the order of civil forfeiture. This is not a

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See magistrate judge's report of June 20, 1995. Accordingly, the

motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the APPEAL is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R.

42.2.
# C_2019191EN.01013701.xml

| 6.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/137 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/137

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2019/C 191/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 20 March 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 81036 |
| Decision No | : | 018/19/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Cash refund of the tax value of petroleum exploration costs |
| Legal basis | : | Petroleum Tax Act |
| Type of measure | : |
| Objective | : |
| Form of aid | : | No aid |
| Budget | : |
| Intensity | : |
| Duration | : |
| Economic sectors | : | Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : |
| Other information | : |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

20 March 2019

Case No

:

81036

Decision No

:

018/19/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Cash refund of the tax value of petroleum exploration costs

Legal basis

:

Petroleum Tax Act

Type of measure

:

Objective

:

Form of aid

:

No aid

Budget

:

Intensity

:

Duration

:

Economic sectors

:

Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---