alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 29

  To convert a temporary judgeship for the district of Nebraska to a 
              permanent judgeship, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Bereuter (for himself, Mr. Terry, and Mr. Osborne) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To convert a temporary judgeship for the district of Nebraska to a 
              permanent judgeship, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA.

    (a) Conversion of Temporary Judgeship to Permanent Judgeship.--The 
existing district judgeship for the district of Nebraska authorized by 
section 203(c) of the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 (Public Law 
101-650; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) shall, as of the date of the enactment of 
this Act, be authorized under section 133 of title 28, United States 
Code, and the incumbent in that office shall hold the office under 
section 133 of title 28, United States Code (as amended by this Act).
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table contained in 
section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
the item relating to Nebraska and inserting the following:

``Nebraska..................................................       4''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

GUILLERMO LOPEZ, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0125 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2003-006174-001

The Honorable M. Scott McCoy, Judge

AFFIRMED

APPEARANCES

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Andrea L. Kever

Counsel for Respondent

Guillermo Lopez, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 6-4-2020
STATE v. LOPEZ

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court, in 

which Judge Kenton D. Jones and Judge D. Steven Williams joined.

B R O W N, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Guillermo Lopez seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s fifth 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
# C_2021058EN.01005501.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/55

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 58/11)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19 October 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85613 |
| Decision No | 119/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Vestfold og Telemark |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 compensation to Dyrsku’n Arrangement AS |
| Legal basis | Allocation letter from the Ministry of Agriculture and Food to Dyrsku’n Arrangement AS, implementing the objective of the decision of 09 October 2020 of the Norwegian Parliament on appropriating state aid in the amount of NOK 11.2 million. |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Compensation of damage caused by exceptional occurrence |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | NOK 11.2 million |
| Intensity | 68,7 % (estimate) |
| Economic sectors | Organisation of conventions and trade shows; Camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks; Other accommodation. |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Agriculture and Food |
| Postboks 8007 Dep. |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

19 October 2020

Case No

85613

Decision No

119/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Vestfold og Telemark

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 compensation to Dyrsku’n Arrangement AS

Legal basis

Allocation letter from the Ministry of Agriculture and Food to Dyrsku’n Arrangement AS, implementing the objective of the decision of 09 October 2020 of the Norwegian Parliament on appropriating state aid in the amount of NOK 11.2 million.

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Compensation of damage caused by exceptional occurrence

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

NOK 11.2 million

Intensity

68,7 % (estimate)

Economic sectors

Organisation of conventions and trade shows; Camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks; Other accommodation.

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Agriculture and Food

Postboks 8007 Dep.

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SETO Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Eugene J. Pian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,, that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: December 12, 2003

| |  |  |  |                                                                       
| |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ Eugene J. PianEugene J. Pian
President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this quarterly report on form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

30
# C_2023123EN.01001201.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/12

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2023/C 123/10)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 7 December 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 89612 |
| Decision No | 224/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Temporary Crisis Framework – Amendment to the grant scheme relating to the exceptionally severe increase in energy prices |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure and its budget, as set out in Innst. 34 S (2022–2023), and the regulation on its administration to be adopted by the Ministry of Climate and Environment |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Support businesses in adapting to higher energy costs and to stimulate them to invest in energy saving and energy production |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | NOK 2,8 billion |
| Intensity | Up to 50 % |
| Duration | 1 October 2022 – 31 December 2023 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors, except for the petroleum extraction and power-intensive industries, and undertakings performing activities falling under SN 2007 codes 35.1 and 35.3 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Enova SF
  Postal address:





  Postboks 5700 Torgarden |
| N-7437 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

7 December 2022

Case No

89612

Decision No

224/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Temporary Crisis Framework – Amendment to the grant scheme relating to the exceptionally severe increase in energy prices

Legal basis

Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure and its budget, as set out in Innst. 34 S (2022–2023), and the regulation on its administration to be adopted by the Ministry of Climate and Environment

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Support businesses in adapting to higher energy costs and to stimulate them to invest in energy saving and energy production

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

NOK 2,8 billion

Intensity

Up to 50 %

Duration

1 October 2022 – 31 December 2023

Economic sectors

All sectors, except for the petroleum extraction and power-intensive industries, and undertakings performing activities falling under SN 2007 codes 35.1 and 35.3

Name and address of the granting authority

Enova SF

Postal address:

Postboks 5700 Torgarden

N-7437 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 313.47 Voluntary repayment agreements as alternative to salary offset where the FDIC is the creditor agency. ( a ) In response to a Notice of Intent, an employee may propose to voluntarily repay the debt through scheduled voluntary payments, in lieu of salary offset. An employee who wishes to repay a debt in this manner shall submit to the Director a written agreement proposing a repayment schedule. This proposal must be received by the Director within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Intent.
( b ) The Director shall notify the employee whether the employee's proposed voluntary repayment agreement is acceptable. It is within the discretion of the Director whether to accept or reject the debtor's proposal, or whether to propose to the debtor a modification of the proposed repayment agreement: ( 1 ) If the Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is unacceptable, he or she shall notify the employee and the employee shall have 30 calendar days from the date he or she received notice of the decision in which to file a request for a hearing on the proposed repayment agreement, as provided in § 313.42; or
( 2 ) If the Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is acceptable or the debtor agrees to a modification proposed by the Director, the agreement shall be put in writing and signed by both the employee and the Director.
# C_2010314EN.01000601.xml

| 18.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/6

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 314/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 14 July 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 59391 |
| Decision number | : | 323/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | The transactions between the municipality of Halden and FUAS regarding land in the Svingenskogen and Langbrygga areas. Fredriksten Utvikling AS |
| Type of measure | : | n.a. |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Halden kommune |
| Storgt 8 |
| 1771 Halden |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

14 July 2010

Case number

:

59391

Decision number

:

323/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

The transactions between the municipality of Halden and FUAS regarding land in the Svingenskogen and Langbrygga areas. Fredriksten Utvikling AS

Type of measure

:

n.a.

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Halden kommune

Storgt 8

1771 Halden

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM HELMSTAR
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES'  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         923,507
<SECURITIES>                                51,117,816
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      28,830,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,929,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     72,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,683,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,929,018
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,002,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  705,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (635,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (648,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (648,128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Cathleen Shoenfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 18, 2005
```
# C_2022075EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 February 2022

(2022/C 75/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1345 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83765 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5739 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0483 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0893 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,419 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5036 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9410 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,4716 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5888 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4433 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8527 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7143 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5265 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 357,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1767 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1969 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 187,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7493 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,144 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,5025 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,724 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,8977 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1113 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,4430 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1345

JPY

Japanese yen

131,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83765

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5739

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0483

ISK

Iceland króna

141,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0893

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,419

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5036

RON

Romanian leu

4,9410

TRY

Turkish lira

15,4716

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5888

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4433

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8527

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7143

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5265

KRW

South Korean won

1 357,50

ZAR

South African rand

17,1767

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1969

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 187,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7493

PHP

Philippine peso

58,144

RUB

Russian rouble

85,5025

THB

Thai baht

36,724

BRL

Brazilian real

5,8977

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1113

INR

Indian rupee

85,4430

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
### U.s.Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation

RebeccaJ. Cronkhite Statewide AviationPlanner October 29.2010

DepartmentofTransportation and Public Facilities 4111 Aviation Avenue P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage, AK 99519
Dear Ms. Cronkhite, 1:'00 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington. DC 20590

Iwould like to update you on the essential air service (EAS) situation at Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit arecommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. As you mayknow. Ellis AirTaxi, Inc. d/b/a Copper Valley Air Service (Ellis Air), is the current EAS provider at those communities, receiving a combined subsidy of$424,652, and theircontract expires January 31, 2011. In anticipation ofthat, we issued Order2010-9-27, September27,2010, soliciting proposals from carriers interested in providing subsidized EAS for a new. two-year period, beginning February 1. 2011. In response to our request, onlythe incumbent. Ellis Air, submitted aproposal to maintain status-quo service at all three communities.
In case you have not received a copyofthe proposal from Ellis Air, it can be accessed at \\ww.regulations.gov by entering the numbers OST-1995-492. I will brietly summarize their proposal here. Ellis Air has proposed one service option at Gulkana using six-seat twin engine PiperPA31 aircraft operating two rollnd trips each week year-round to Anchorage for an annual subsidy of$262,220. At May Creek and McCarthy, Ellis Airproposes to provide two nonstop orone-stop round trips per week to Gulkana using three-seat Cessna 185 aircraft during winter months and four-seat Cessna 206 aircraft during summer months for an annual subsidy of$176,692.
The schedules that the carrierhas proposed are illustrative only and they may make schedule changes to reflect changing conditions, e.g., to better meet shifting connecting hank times at the hub. However, the Department does expect a subsidized air carrier to maintain well-timed and well-spaced flights in orderto ensure full compensation.
We request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than November 16. We will carefullyconsider your comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a decision.

### - 2

-

Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.gov or by fax to 202-366-7638. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Michael Martin ofmy staffat michael.f.martin@dot.gov or202-366-6494. Sincerely,

cc: Gulkana Village Council McCarthy Area Council Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviationAnalysis