alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014138EN.01002801.xml

| 8.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/28

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2014/C 138/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 12 February 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74910 |
| Decision number | : | 56/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | A prolongation and a budget increase of the Norwegian Bioenergy Scheme |
| Legal basis | : | Annual Agricultural Agreement and state budget approved by the Norwegian Parliament for 2014 |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection; Increasing supply of renewable energy for heating, and contributing to energy saving |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 60 million (Annual budget subject to parliamentary budget procedures) |
| Duration | : | 2014 (until expiry of the current Environmental Guidelines) |
| Economic sectors | : | Energy |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries |
| PO Box 8090 Dep |
| NO-0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

12 February 2014

Case number

Case number

:

74910

Decision number

Decision number

:

56/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

Title

:

A prolongation and a budget increase of the Norwegian Bioenergy Scheme

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Annual Agricultural Agreement and state budget approved by the Norwegian Parliament for 2014

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection; Increasing supply of renewable energy for heating, and contributing to energy saving

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 60 million (Annual budget subject to parliamentary budget procedures)

Duration

Duration

:

2014 (until expiry of the current Environmental Guidelines)

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Energy

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries

PO Box 8090 Dep

NO-0032 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
### SERVED JANUAR Y 6 , 201 0

^ ^^^i\' i -

U S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTH EMATTERO F 

### FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T N o CP09GL000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S FAA-2009-009 7 

### POSTHEARIN G BRIEFIN G ORDE R Th e hearin g i n thi s matte r wa s hel do nOctobe r

29 , 2009
. Th e transcript s hav e bee n received
. Th e followin g briefin g schedul e i s hereb y adopted : 1
. Complainant' s Post-Hearin g Brie f shal l b e file do no r

befor e clos e o f busines s Februar y 5 , 2010 ; 2
. Respondent' s Post-Hearin g Brie f shal l b e file do no r

befor e clos e o f busines s Marc h5 , 2010 ; an d 3
. Complainant' s Repl y Brief , if any , shal l b e file do no r

befor e clos e o f busines s Marc h19 , 2010
. I f Complainan t

choose s no t

t o fil e aRepl y Brie f i t shal l notif

y th e Judg e an dResponden t i natimel y maimer
.
/ 

# C -Owk ^ Richar dC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachments - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09GL000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y J
. Mark Hansen , Lea dCounse l Federa l Expres s Corporatio n Regulatory Affairs , Lega l Departmen t 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3rdFloo r Memphis , T N 3812 5 TEL : (901 ) 434-858 3 FAX : (901)434-828 3 Kat e Barber , Attorne y Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AGL-7 B Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DesPlaines , X

L6001 8 TEL : (847 ) 294-786 2 FAX : (847)294-829 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : (202 ) 366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r (202 ) 366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : (202)366-753 6

' Servic e wa

s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
# C_2021457EN.01000701.xml

| 11.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/7

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 457/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6 July 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87066 |
| Decision No | 199/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 renewal of an amended aid scheme compensating for the cancellation of large public events |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary decision authorising the scheme and the prolongation in the revised State budget. In addition to a letter of assignment from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and co-organisers of large public events face following the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 130 million |
| Intensity | 60 % |
| Duration | Until 31 December 2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| Pb. 448 Sentrum |
| Akersgata 13 |
| N-0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

6 July 2021

Case No

87066

Decision No

199/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 renewal of an amended aid scheme compensating for the cancellation of large public events

Legal basis

Parliamentary decision authorising the scheme and the prolongation in the revised State budget. In addition to a letter of assignment from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and co-organisers of large public events face following the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 130 million

Intensity

60 %

Duration

Until 31 December 2021

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Pb. 448 Sentrum

Akersgata 13

N-0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2020304EN.01000301.xml

| 14.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/3

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie v Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19)

(Joined Cases C-632/19 and C-633/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Dumping - Importation of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 - Validity and interpretation - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual background of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 304/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie

Defendants: Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19)

Operative part of the order

The references for a preliminary ruling made by the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (District Court of Antwerp, Belgium) by decisions of 27 March 2019 are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
# C_2009241EN.01001601.xml

| 8.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/16

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

2009/C 241/07

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 27 March 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 65140 |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title | : | Loan category of the Housing Financing Fund on lending to banks, saving banks and other financial institutions for the purpose of temporarily refinancing mortgage loans |
| Legal basis | : | Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 17 July 2008, amending Regulation (EC) No 458/1999 on the loan categories of the Housing Financing Fund, as subsequently replaced by Regulation (EC) No 57/2009 on the loan categories of the Housing Financing Fund |
| Objective | : | To remedy the serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | : | Asset swap |
| Budget | : | ISK 30 billion (approximately EUR 246 million) |
| Duration | : | Three months, subject to prolongations up to maximum 12 months, upon applicant’s request |
| Economic sectors | : | Banking and financial sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Housing Financing Fund |
| Borgartúni 21 |
| 105 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

27 March 2009

Case number

:

65140

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title

:

Loan category of the Housing Financing Fund on lending to banks, saving banks and other financial institutions for the purpose of temporarily refinancing mortgage loans

Legal basis

:

Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 17 July 2008, amending Regulation (EC) No 458/1999 on the loan categories of the Housing Financing Fund, as subsequently replaced by Regulation (EC) No 57/2009 on the loan categories of the Housing Financing Fund

Objective

:

To remedy the serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

:

Asset swap

Budget

:

ISK 30 billion (approximately EUR 246 million)

Duration

:

Three months, subject to prolongations up to maximum 12 months, upon applicant’s request

Economic sectors

:

Banking and financial sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Housing Financing Fund

Borgartúni 21

105 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
# C_2017377EN.01000801.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/8

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2017/C 377/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 25 July 2017 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 80833 |
| Decision No | : | 145/17/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Akershus |
| Title | : | Operating aid scheme for hydrogen refuelling stations in the county of Akershus |
| Legal basis | : | The County Council’s Hydrogen Strategy for 2014-2025 adopted on 17 March 2014, the Action Plan for Akershus 2015-2016 and Guidelines for the scheme adopted by the County Council. |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 5 million per year |
| Duration | : | 5 years |
| Economic sectors | : | Retail services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Akershus County Council |
| Other information | : |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

25 July 2017

Case No

Case No

:

80833

Decision No

Decision No

:

145/17/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Akershus

Title

Title

:

Operating aid scheme for hydrogen refuelling stations in the county of Akershus

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The County Council’s Hydrogen Strategy for 2014-2025 adopted on 17 March 2014, the Action Plan for Akershus 2015-2016 and Guidelines for the scheme adopted by the County Council.

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Direct grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 5 million per year

Duration

Duration

:

5 years

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Retail services

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Akershus County Council

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2011025EN.01000401.xml

| 27.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/4

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2011/C 25/03

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 8/10/ENV |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| EFTA State reference number | 09/3038 (Ministry of Finance reference) |
| Granting authority | Name | Directorate of Customs and Excise (regional customs authorities) |
| Address | Postboks 8122 Dep |
| 0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 8/10/ENV

EFTA State

Norway

EFTA State reference number

09/3038 (Ministry of Finance reference)

Granting authority

Name

Directorate of Customs and Excise (regional customs authorities)

Address

Postboks 8122 Dep

0032 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.toll.no

Title of the aid measure

Exemption and reduction of CO2 tax on natural gas and LPG

2

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Parliamentary decision of 18 June 2010 concerning CO2 tax on natural gas and LPG

2

Regulation No 1451 of 11 December 2001 concerning excise duties

§§ 3-6-6, 3-6-7, 4-3-1, 4-3-2

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/sv/td-20091126-1499-016.html

http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/fd/xd-20011211-1451.html

Type of measure

Scheme

Tax exemption and reduction

Duration

Scheme

1.9.2010 to 31.12.2019

Economic sector(s) concerned

Limited to specific sectors — Please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2

Part of NACE 05-33 Reduced CO2 tax for mining and quarrying industry and manufacturing industry

2

Part of NACE 05-33 + 38.21. Reduced CO2 tax for enterprises subject to the emission trading system

2

NACE 50.2 + 50.1 Exemption for domestic shipping

Type of beneficiary

SME

Both SM and large enterprises

Large enterprises

Both SM and large enterprises

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

NOK 250 (in millions) Mining, industry and emission trading

NOK 25 (in millions) Domestic shipping

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Fiscal measure

Tax reduction

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME-bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for environmental protection
  (Articles 17-25) | Aid in the form of reductions in environmental taxes
  (Article 25) | NOK 275 (in millions) annually | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME-bonuses in %

Aid for environmental protection

(Articles 17-25)

Aid in the form of reductions in environmental taxes

(Article 25)

NOK 275 (in millions) annually

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT 

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on 

the preliminary analyses addressing energy conservation standards for commercial refrigeration 

equipment (CRE). 

Agenda 

9:00 – 9:30 am Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review, & Opening Statements 

Doug Brookman 

Interested parties make a brief summary of their comments. 

9:30 – 9:45 am Standards Rulemaking Overview 

Charles Llenza 

Summary of the statutory background, rulemaking process, and the issues 

 on which DOE seeks input during today’s public meeting. 

9:45 – 10:30 am Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and 

 Engineering Analysis 

Collin Weber 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and 

 factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening 

 analysis, and engineering analysis. 

10:30 – 11:15 am Markups Analysis, Energy Use Analysis, and Life-Cycle Cost and 

 Payback Period Analysis 

 Satish Bapanapalli 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and 

 factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, 

 energy use analysis, and life-cycle cost and payback period analysis. 
11:15– 11:45 am Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis 

Alan Cooke 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and 

 factors considered for the shipments analysis and national energy savings 

 and net present value analysis. 

11:45 am – 12:00 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis 

Christopher Lau 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach to be used 

 and factors to be considered for the manufacturer impact analysis. 

12:00 – 1:00 pm Lunch 

1:00 – 1:15 pm NOPR Analyses: Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact 

 Analysis, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact 

 Analysis 

Satish Bapanapalli 

Description of analyses DOE will conduct in the NOPR stage of the 

 rulemaking. 

1:15 – 1:45 pm Test Procedure Rulemaking Overview 

Andrew Nawrocki 

 Summary of the background, rulemaking process, issues, and proposals 

 regarding DOE’s ongoing CRE test procedure rulemaking. 

1:45 – 2:15 pm Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement 

Ashley Armstrong 

 Summary presentation and discussion regarding certification, compliance,

 and enforcement actions for commercial refrigeration equipment. 

2:15 – 2:30 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks 

Doug Brookman 

Final discussions on issues and closing remarks.
#### David Lampert, Appellant, *v.*John Ravid, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

November, 1900.)

1. Municipal Court of the city of New York — An action to recover a deposit made to bind the formation of a future partnership is not equitable in its nature — Jurisdiction.

An action to recover a deposit, not made to create a partnership but merely as an assurance of the performance of an executory agreement to form a partnership within a definite time, is not equitable in its nature, does not involve an accounting, and, therefore, may be brought in the Municipal Court of the city of New York.

2. Same — Dismissal on the merits, when improper.

Where a complaint is dismissed in said court at the close of the plaintiff’s case, there can be no absolute dismissal,.as there has been no trial on the merits.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendant.

L. B. Boudin, for appellant.

William Stainton, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think, upon the whole, there should be a reversal of the judgment in this case. The evidence shows that the agreement, with respect to the performance of which the money sued for was deposited with the defendant, was not an agreement of partnership, hut an agreement to enter into a copartnership, the articles of which were to be subsequently drawn and executed. It is true that the record shows that counsel on both sides apparently admitted the existence of a copartnership, but the evidence, with respect to the circumstances under which the money was paid, certainly indicates that such payment was understood by the parties to be in the nature of an assurance that the articles of copartnership would be executed within the time stipulated therefor by the parties. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the court below dismissed the complaint, evidently on the ground that *116because a copartnership was admitted, the plaintiff could, only bring an action in equity for an accounting, and. that' the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction to entertain such a suit. The facts, however, plainly show that the money was paid to the dofendant and was received by him as a deposit which was to be forfeited in case the plaintiff failed to sign the articles of copartnership; that is,"in case of a breach of the executory contract which he had entered into with the defendant, that a copartnership between them should be formed. An action upon such an executory agreement may be maintained at law.

The trial justice also erred in awarding judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint on the merits. There was no trial of the cause on the merits, and if it was to be dismissed, there could be only a dismissal without prejudice to a new action. Merkin v. Gersh, 30 Misc. Rep. 758.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event..

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
#### § 192.7 Electronic filing.

For Federal savings associations, the OCC encourages the electronic filing of all applications, notices, or other documents required by this part through *http://www.banknet.gov/*. The Comptroller's Licensing Manual describes the OCC's electronic filing procedures.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3090

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for eligibility 

for coverage of home health services under the Medicare Program on 

the basis of a need for occupational therapy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for eligibility for coverage of home health services under 

the Medicare Program on the basis of a need for occupational therapy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Occupational 

5 Therapy Coverage Eligibility Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3090 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOME HEALTH SERVICES ON THE 

2 BASIS OF A NEED FOR OCCUPATIONAL THER3 APY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and 

5 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395f(a)(2)(C); 1395n(a)(2)(A)) are each amended by 

7 striking ‘‘or speech therapy’’ and all that follows through 

8 ‘‘need occupational therapy’’ and inserting ‘‘, occupa9 tional, or speech therapy’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to home health services provided 

12 on or after October 1, 2003.

Æ