alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~p^ 

Q 

U.S. Department „„„, ^ 

nf Trancnnrtntinn ^^^ Independence Ave., S.W. 

oi I ransponaiion O^.^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^.^^ Counsel Washington. D.C. 20591 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

SEP 0 2 2009 

Scott P. Lewis, Esq. By Fax and Regular Mail 

Christine M. Griffin, Esq. 

Anderson & Kreiger LLP 

One Canal Park, Suite 200 

Cambridge, MA 02141 

RE: Skvdive Sacramento v. City of Lincoln. FAA Docket No. 16-09-09 

Dear Mr. Lewis: 

We have received your August 25, 2009 request for an extension of time until September 21, 

2009, in which to file an answer on behalf of the Respondent, City of Lincoln, California, in 

the above-captioned proceeding. The answer was due on August 31, 2009. You state that you 

needed the additional time to prepare an appropriate response to the complaint. You noted that 

the City sought to obtain the consent of Skydive Sacramento to the proposed extension of time, 

however, complainant declined to consent absent unacceptable concessions by the City. 

Given the fact that the City's answer was due on Monday, August 31, you contacted this office 

by telephone on Friday afternoon, August 28, to determine whether your motion had been 

granted. I advised you that the City's motion had been granted. Later that afternoon, I 

received the complainant's August 27 Response to Respondent's Motion to Extend Time. In 

that document, the complainant requests that the motion be denied, or in the alternative, be 

granted but only for a one or two day extension. 

As I advised you on August 28, your request on behalf of the City for the extension has been 

granted. The Respondent City of Lincoln's answer is now due on or before September 21, 

2009. However, given the complainant's opposition and motion, we request that you file the 

City's answer as soon as practicable. 

Sincerely, 

Jonathan W. Cross , \;s^ 

Manager, Airports Law Branch r-^ 

Airports and Environmental g 

Law Division :j -'-

cc: Richard J. Durden, Esq. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September r^ . 2009,1 caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) or personally delivered, a true copy of the 

foregoing document addressed to: 

Complainant's Counsel 

Richard J. Durden, Esq. 

27987 Richmond Hill Road 

Conifer, Colorado 80433 

Federal Aviation Administration 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-610) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Airport Compliance Division (Internal Mail) 

Sharice Jefferson 

Airports & Environmental Law Division 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          61,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,047,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,047,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,047,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012314EN.01000501.xml

| 18.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/5

---

Thresholds referred to in Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011, expressed in the national currencies of the EFTA States

2012/C 314/05

| | Thresholds in NOK | Thresholds in CHF | Thresholds in ISK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Thresholds in EUR | | | |
| 130 000 | 1 042 319 | 176 310 | 21 540 485 |
| 200 000 | 1 603 568 | 271 246 | 33 139 208 |
| 400 000 | 3 207 136 | 542 492 | 66 278 416 |
| 5 000 000 | 40 089 200 | 6 781 150 | 828 480 200 |

Thresholds in NOK

Thresholds in CHF

Thresholds in ISK

Thresholds in EUR

130 000

1 042 319

176 310

21 540 485

200 000

1 603 568

271 246

33 139 208

400 000

3 207 136

542 492

66 278 416

5 000 000

40 089 200

6 781 150

828 480 200

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          11,309
<SECURITIES>                                    34,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,613
<INVENTORY>                                      2,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,046
<PP&E>                                         135,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,249
<BONDS>                                        152,994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,459
<SALES>                                          7,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,519
<CGS>                                            6,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (49)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017303EN.01000501.xml

| 14.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/5

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2017/C 303/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 20 June 2017 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 80745 |
| Decision No | : | 103/17/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Aid scheme for short sea shipping — increased budget |
| Legal basis | : | The Norwegian Parliament decides on the scope of the aid scheme in its annual decisions on the state budget. |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 82 million for 2017 and NOK 100 million for 2018 to 2021 |
| Intensity | : | Up to 30 % of operational cost |
| Duration | : | First quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022 (5 years) |
| Economic sectors | : | Transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | The Ministry of Transport and Communications/The Norwegian Coastal Administration |
| P.O. Box 1502 |
| N-6025 Ålesund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

20 June 2017

Case No

Case No

:

80745

Decision No

Decision No

:

103/17/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Aid scheme for short sea shipping — increased budget

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Norwegian Parliament decides on the scope of the aid scheme in its annual decisions on the state budget.

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Direct grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 82 million for 2017 and NOK 100 million for 2018 to 2021

Intensity

Intensity

:

Up to 30 % of operational cost

Duration

Duration

:

First quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022 (5 years)

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

The Ministry of Transport and Communications/The Norwegian Coastal Administration

P.O. Box 1502

N-6025 Ålesund

NORWAY

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2302

EDMOND MACHIE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MANUEL VINCENS; ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT , Defendant s - Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 01068

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Edmond Machie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice and requiring him to file an amended complaint, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order, and denying his
motion for reconsideration

. ∗ With respect to the district court’s dismis sal orders, we have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (pleading standard); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (authorizing dismissal for failure to comply with court order); Martin v. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 248 (4th Cir. 2017) (d iscussing pleading standard), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 738 (2018); Ballard v. Carlson , 882 F.2d 93, 95

- 96 (4th Cir. 1989) (reviewing Rule 41(b) dismissal for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm those orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Machie v. Vincens , No. 1:18

- cv 01068

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. filed & entered Sept. 17, 2018; filed Sept. 25 & entered Sept. 26, 2018). The district court should have construed Machie’s motion for reconsideration as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, rathe r than a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, as it was filed within 28 days of the entry of the court’s order dismissing the complaint with prejudice

. See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. , 599 F.3d 403, 412 & n.11 (4th Cir. 2010); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (providing current time limit for filing motion to alter or amend).

∗ Although Machie did not file a new or amended notice of appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), (B)(ii), we conclude that Machie’s informal brief serves as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal from that order, see Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248

- 49 (1992).3 Nevertheless, b ecause Machie’s motion failed to demonstrate any ground that would entitle him to relief pursuant to Rule 59(e), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Wilkins v. Montgomery , 751 F.3d 214, 220 (4th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Robinson , 599 F.3d at 407 (describing grounds for Rule 59(e) relief)

. Accordingly, we affirm the order denying postjudgment relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2008033EN.01001001.xml

| 7.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/10

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 14 September 2007 in the case of Celina Nguyen v The Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Justice and the Police

(Case E-8/07)

(2008/C 33/08)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 14 September 2007 from Oslo tingrett (Oslo District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 17 September 2007, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Celina Nguyen v The Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Justice and the Police, on the following questions:

| 1. | Is it compatible with the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives to except redress for non-economic loss (‘pain and suffering’) from the compulsory insurance system under national law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives to except redress for non-economic loss (‘pain and suffering’) from the compulsory insurance system under national law?

| 2. | If the question is answered in the negative: is an exception from the insurance coverage as mentioned in question 1, a sufficiently serious breach of the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives to be able to entail State liability? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the question is answered in the negative: is an exception from the insurance coverage as mentioned in question 1, a sufficiently serious breach of the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives to be able to entail State liability?

---
§ 268.2 Definitions. The definitions contained in this section shall have the following meanings throughout this part unless otherwise stated. ( a ) *Commission or EEOC* means the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
( b ) *Title VII* means title VII of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,958
<PP&E>                                           4,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,103
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,659
<SALES>                                         30,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,574
<CGS>                                           14,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018414EN.01000801.xml

| 15.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 June 2018

in Case E-13/17

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) 2015/514)

(2018/C 414/10)

In Case E-13/17, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbe of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/514 of 18 December 2014 on the information to be provided by competent authorities to the European Securities and Markets Authority pursuant to Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, part of its internal legal order, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 14 June 2018, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbe of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/514 of 18 December 2014 on the information to be provided by competent authorities to the European Securities and Markets Authority pursuant to Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, part of its internal legal order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing to make the Act referred to at point 31bbe of Annex IX to that Agreement (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/514 of 18 December 2014 on the information to be provided by competent authorities to the European Securities and Markets Authority pursuant to Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, part of its internal legal order.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-FHC-2009-N197; 94240-1341-9BIS-N5]


Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance 
Species (ANS) Task Force. The meeting is open to the public. The 
meeting topics are identified in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.

DATES: The ANS Task Force will meet from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday, 
November 4 through Thursday, November 5, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The ANS Task Force meeting will take place at the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910 (301-713-0174). You may inspect minutes of the meeting 
at the office of the Chief, Division of Fisheries and Aquatic Resource 
Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA 22203, during regular business hours, Monday through 
Friday. You may also view the minutes on the ANS Task Force Web site 
at: http://anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Mangin, ANS Task Force, 
Executive Secretary, at (703) 358-2466, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adfed8deccc3f2e0ccc3cac4c3edcbdade83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96c5e3e5f7f8c9dbf7f8f1fff8d6f0e1e5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces meetings 
of the ANS Task Force. The ANS Task Force was established by the 
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990.
    Topics that the ANS Task Force plans to cover during the meeting 
include: the ANS Task Force Strategic Plan, Regional Panel issues and 
recommendations, the Quagga-Zebra Mussel Action Plan for Western U.S. 
Waters, and consideration for approval of state ANS management plans. 
The agenda and other related meeting information are on the ANS Task 
Force Web site at: http://anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php.

    Dated: September 29, 2009.
Jeffrey Underwood,
Acting Co-Chair, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Deputy Assistant 
Director--Fisheries & Habitat Conservation.
[FR Doc. E9-24333 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>