alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42582.

#### HASKINS v. CARSON.

Submitted February 8, 1967

Decided March 2, 1967.

*337*Sumner & Boatright, J. Laddie Boatright,*for appellant.

*Preston & Preston, M. L. Preston,*for appellee.

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant contends the plaintiff’s testimony, as to the items of the account and the amount due, consisted of information acquired solely through records that were kept by a third person. Hence, he argues that such evidence was hearsay, without probative value, and did not authorize the verdict.

After having refreshed his memory by looking at the petition the plaintiff testified, without objection, as to the amount which had been paid on the account and how much was due thereon. Testimony of a witness as to the facts from which books of account are made up is admissible as primary evidence. *Harper v. Hammond & Sons,*13 Ga. App. 238 (3) (79 SE 44); *Booth v. Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co.,*32 Ga. App. 35 (3) (122 SE 636); *Code*§ 38-1707; *Lenney v. Finley,*118 Ga. 427, 430 (45 SE 317).

While the evidence was in sharp conflict as to the sum due on the account and the amount of labor furnished to the defendant it was sufficient to support the verdict. Enumerations of error 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 11 are without merit.

Enumerations of error 6 through 9 complain that: (1) the charge was not adjusted to the pleadings, issues and evidence; (2) the court erred in failing to give certain instructions to the jury, even without request. These objections, not having been made before the jury returned its verdict as required by *Code Ann.*§ 70-207 (a) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 498), are not considered.

The appellant insists in Enumerations of error 12 and 13 that the trial judge erred in refusing to allow two wit*338nesses who were carpenters to testify as to the value and amount of labor necessary to construct a structure similar to the defendant’s cabin. Assuming arguendo that the testimony would have been admissible, there was no proper foundation laid for its admission in the present case. The witnesses failed to testify as to several essential facts that would have been necessary to enable them to form a valid opinion as to the value of the cabin and the amount of labor necessary for its construction. One of the essentials lacking was that there was no evidence that either witness had been inside the cabin subsequent to its completion. *Georgia Power Co. v. Livingston,*103 Ga. App. 512 (2) (119 SE2d 802). The testimony was properly excluded.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
# C_2008268EN.01001401.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/14

---

Withdrawal of notification of request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

(2008/C 268/05)

On 10 June 2008, the EFTA Surveillance Authority received a request from Norway pursuant to Article 30(4) of the Act referred to at point 4 of Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors) (1) to exclude from the scope of application of the Act the exploration for or extraction of oil and gas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf as well as the transportation of natural gas through the upstream pipeline network in that country.

1

A Notice regarding Norway's request was published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180, 17.7.2008, page 18 and in the EEA Supplement No 43, 17 July 2008, page 35.

Official Journal of the European Union

By letter of 17 July 2008, the Norwegian Government informed the EFTA Surveillance Authority of the withdrawal with immediate effect of the application made by Norway under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC.

The present Notice therefore supersedes the previous Notice and the application is considered by the Authority to have been withdrawn. Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC continues to apply to the exploration for or extraction of oil and gas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf as well as the transportation of natural gas through the upstream pipeline network in that country.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II 

Calendar No. 554 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3068 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS7 Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 3068 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain 

6 Post Office’’. 

Calendar No. 554 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3068 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRet.) John H. McLain Post Office’’. sota, Florida, as the ‘‘Brigadier General (AUS- al Service located at 2055 Siesta Drive in SaraJUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 99.2




				Exhibit 99(ii)

			    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
				 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Jason F. Griffith, Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of  operations of  the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
June 22, 2000


Donald J. McDonald, Jr.
C/O Directrix, Inc.
236 West 26th Street, Suite 12W
New York, New York 10001

RE: Employment Agreement effective as of March 15, 1999

Dear Mr. McDonald:

We refer to the Employment  Agreement between Directrix,  Inc. and you effective
as of March 15, 1999 ("Employment  Agreement").  All terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.

         1.  Salary Reduction.   At our request, you have  agreed to a temporary
reduction  in your Base Salary  from $204,750 to $180,000 effective with the pay
period beginning  June 24, 2000 and  through the end  of our  fiscal  year ended
March 31, 2001.

         2.  Option  Issuance.   In  consideration  of  your  agreement  to  the
reduction in  your  Base Salary provided for above,  we will grant you an option
("Option")  to  acquire  5,000  shares  of  Directrix  Common Stock in  the form
attached.  The Option provides for an exercise price  of $4.00 per share and the
Option is fully vested.

If the foregoing  correctly reflects you agreement with the matters provided for
herein, please sign below.

We appreciate your support of Directrix.

Sincerely,
DIRECTRIX, INC.



By:_________________________________
   J. Roger Faherty,
   Chairman & CEO


AGREED TO:



____________________________________
Donald J. McDonald, Jr.
# C_2022438EN.01000601.xml

| 18.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 438/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 438/6

---

NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for Standards, Dissemination, Cooperation in the European Statistical System (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Eurostat

(Luxembourg)

COM/2022/10420

(2022/C 438/06)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2022/10420) for the function of Director for Standards, Dissemination, Cooperation in the European Statistical System (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Eurostat (Luxembourg).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!XVXW4m

---
# C_2014267EN.01000301.xml

| 14.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty) (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(2014/C 267/03)

PART I

| Aid reference | GBER 4/2014/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Buskerud fylkeskommune
  (Buskerud County Authority) |
| | Address | Postboks 3563 |
| N-3007 Drammen |
| NORWAY |

Aid reference

GBER 4/2014/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Buskerud fylkeskommune

(Buskerud County Authority)

Address

Postboks 3563

N-3007 Drammen

NORWAY

Webpage

www.bfk.no

Title of the aid measure

Aid to Regional- knowledge- and business cluster within osteoporosis

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Letter of commitment from Buskerud County Authority to Papirbredden Innovasjon AS, dated 20.3.2014

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

Minutes of Meeting U.27.11.2013, PS 13/81 (Case 2013/871) - Allocation of regional development funds to Drammen Region 2013 – Further interaction with Drammen Region (1)

1

http://www.bfk.no/Politikk-1/Motekalender/Fylkesutvalget/#moter/2013/569

Type of measure

Ad hoc aid

Papirbredden Innovasjon AS

Date of granting

Ad hoc aid

20.3.2014

Economic sector(s) concerned

Limited to specific sectors — Please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2.

NACE 70.220

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Budget

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

NOK 0,150 in millions

Aid instrument

(Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General Objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME
  – bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects
  (Article 31) | Fundamental research
  (Article 31(2)(a)) | ... % | |
| | | Industrial research
  (Article 31(2)(b)) | ... % | |
| | | Experimental development
  (Article 31(2)(c)) | 25 % | 35 % |

General Objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME

– bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects

(Article 31)

Fundamental research

(Article 31(2)(a))

... %

Industrial research

(Article 31(2)(b))

... %

Experimental development

(Article 31(2)(c))

25 %

35 %

---

(1)  In Norwegian: ‘Møteprotokoll U 27.11.2013, PS 13/81 (Arkivsak 2013/871) - Tildeling av regionale utviklingsmidler til Drammensregionen 2013 – Videre samhandling med Drammensregionen’.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****FAA costaccounting system FY ... oceanic service delivery point report for the year ending...**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.88/3:
ItemNumber:0431-C-73(online)
CGPsystem Number:000602825
 
1999
2000
2001
2003
 **
§ 246.3 Assessed companies. An assessed company is any company that: ( a ) Is a top-tier company that, on December 31 of the assessment period: ( 1 ) Is a bank holding company, other than a foreign bank holding company, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based on the average of the bank holding company's total consolidated assets reported for the assessment period on the Federal Reserve's Form FR Y-9C (“FR Y-9C”),
( 2 ) ( i ) Is a savings and loan holding company, other than a foreign savings and loan holding company, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, based on the average of the savings and loan holding company's total consolidated assets as reported for the assessment period on the FR Y-9C or on the Quarterly Savings and Loan Holding Company Report (FR 2320), as applicable.
( ii ) If a company does not calculate its total consolidated assets under GAAP for any regulatory purpose (including compliance with applicable securities laws), the company may request that the Board permit the company to file a quarterly estimate of its total consolidated assets. The Board may, in its discretion and subject to Board review and adjustment, permit the company to provide estimated total consolidated assets on a quarterly basis. For purposes of this part, the company's total consolidated assets will be the average of the estimated total consolidated assets provided for the assessment period.
( b ) Is a top-tier foreign bank holding company on December 31 of the assessment period, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based on the average of the foreign bank holding company's total consolidated assets reported for the assessment period on the Federal Reserve's Form FR Y-7Q (“FR Y-7Q”), provided, however, that if any such company has filed only one FR Y-7Q during the assessment period, the Board shall use an average of the foreign bank holding company's total consolidated assets reported on that FR Y-7Q and on the FR Y-7Q for the corresponding period in the year prior to the assessment period.
( c ) Is a top-tier foreign savings and loan holding company on December 31 of the assessment period, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based on the average of the foreign savings and loan holding company's total consolidated assets reported for the assessment period on the reporting forms applicable during the assessment period, provided, however, that if any such company has filed only one reporting form during the assessment period, the Board shall use an average of the foreign savings and loan holding company's total consolidated assets reported on that reporting form and on the reporting form for the corresponding period in the year prior to the assessment period, or
( d ) Is a nonbank financial company supervised by the Board.
[85 FR 78953, Dec. 8, 2020]
# C_2015150EN.01000401.xml

| 7.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/4

---

Notice in accordance with Article 2 of Decision 2005/15/EC (1)

1

Request for applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC

Logistics services in the postal sector (Norway)

(2015/C 150/04)

On 23 March 2015, the EFTA Surveillance Authority received a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (2). The first working day following receipt of the request is 24 March 2015.

2

This request, filed by Posten Norge AS, concerns the provision of various logistic services in the postal sector. The abovementioned Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority is allowed a period of 3 months to take a decision on this request, commencing on 24 March. The period therefore expires on 24 June 2015.

The aforementioned period may, however, be extended by a maximum of 3 months in duly justified cases, in particular if the information provided in the request or in the documents annexed thereto is incomplete or inexact or if the facts as reported undergo any substantive changes. Any such extension shall be published. According to the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning the provision of logistic services in the postal sector before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request are not considered as new procedures and are to be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  Commission Decision 2005/15/EC of 7 January 2005 on the detailed rules for the application of the procedure provided for in Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 7, 11.1.2005, p. 7).

1

(2)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

2

---
## Public Notice 2015 Proposed Rules

The West Virginia Division of Air Quality has sc heduled a public heari ng on July 7, 2014 for its 2015 proposed legislative rules, which will ta ke place at the Division of Environmental Protection’s Charlest on headquarters, 601 57 th Street S.E., Charleston, WV 25304. Oral and written comments will be limited to the proposed revisions and will be made a part of the rulemaking record. Copies of the rules are available from the Secr etary of State’s office or from the DEP at http://www.dep.wv.gov/pio/Pages/Rules.aspx

. You may also obtain hard copies of the information by calling the phone number listed below.

Written comments may be submitted to the Public Information Office at the above address. Comments may also be e-mailed to dep.comments@wv.gov . The hearing dates, locations and comment deadlines are as follows: The public hear ing for all air quality rules will take place beginning at 6 p.m. on July 7, 2014 in the Dolly Sods Conference Room. The comment period will begin on June 6, 2014 and end at the conclusion of the public hearing.

Division of Air Quality 45CSR14 – Permits for Construction and Major M odification of Major St ationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality 45CSR16 – Standards of Performanc e for New Stationary Sources 45CSR25 – Control of Air Polluti on from Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities 45CSR30 – Requirements for Operating Permits 45CSR34 – Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Upon authorization and promulgation of revisi ons to 45CSR14, the DAQ will submit the rule to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the State Implementation Plan pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act. Upon authorization and promulgation, Rules 45CSR16, 45CSR25 and 45CSR34 will be submitted to EPA to fulfill federal obligations under the Clean Air Act, including delegations, plans and pr ogram approvals. Upon authorization and promulgation of 45CSR30, the rule will be submitte d to the EPA as a revision to the State’s Operating Permit Program under Title V of the federal Clean Air Act.

For more information on any of the DAQ rules call 304-926-0475.
82/83/2817 88:11 4252271887 ANH7 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MICHAEL HUERTA, 

ADMINISTRATOR, 

) 

) 

) DOKET No.: FAA -2016-4270 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, ) 

Complainant, 

"· 

AERO TECH, LLC 

Respondent. 

) Case No. 2015WA910115 

) 

) FAA Enforcement Team: Western 

) 

) .Judge: Douglas M. Rawald 

) 

) 

) 

) 

NOTICE OF UNAVAlLABlLITY 

PAGE 82/83 

As a reminder, the undersigned will be out of the office from approximately February l3 

until mid to late April. If communications with the FAA are necessary during this time period 

please contact JeffKamberg, the undersigned's assistant, at 425·227-2925. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kyle Lomazow 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

1601 Lind Ave, SW 

Renton, WA 98057-3356 

Email: kyle.lomazow@faa.gov 

Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) 

(425) 227-1847 (direct) 

(425) 2n.1 007 (fax) 
02/03/2017 08:11 4252271007 PAGE 03/03 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Unavailability has been served via facsimile, and 

First-Class Mail, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC"430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

FAX: (202) 267-1293 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M"20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 

FAX: (202)-366-7536 

Stephen Doerr, Respondent's Counsel 

DOERR & KNUDSON, PA 

212 West First Street 

Portales, NM 88130 

TEL: (575)-359-1289 

Fax: (575) 359-1289 

Dated this 3rd day of February, 2017. 

(~ 

2 
02/03/2017 08:11 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 01/03 

T Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Judge 

, Douglas M, Rawald, Office of Hearings, and 

To: ! Steo~hen Doerr, Counsel for Resoondent 

Phone: 

I (202) 267-1293, 202-366-7536, 575~359-

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ANM~7 

1601 Lind Ave , SW. 

Renton, WA 98057 

I Fax: 1289 

Telephone: (425) 227-1847 

Facsimile: (425) 227-1007 

Email: 

From: Kvle Lomazow 

Title: FAA Attornev, ANM-7 

I Facsimile 

I 

I Date: Febr\Jary 3, 2017 

3 Description of item being trensmltted: 

Pages w/cover: Notice of Unavailability 

D Per your Request D For Review D Please Comment 

D For Coordination )(Hard Copy to Follow via U.S. Mail 

NOTES/COMMENTS: 

RE: Aero Tech, LLC, Docket No, FM~2016-4270 

The information contained in this facsimile message is intended for the use of the designated addressee only, 

The information transm~ted may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or may be protected under the Privacy 

Act If you are not the designated addressee and you receive this document through inadvertent error, any further 

review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communrcation is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVE THIS 

COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING (31 0) 725-

7100 AND DESTROY THE ORIGINAL OF THIS COMMUNICATION. Thank You. 

0 U.S. Deparltllent or TrAnsports11on
#### § 268.706 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 268.707 of this subpart, no qualified individual with a disability shall, because the Board's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with a disability, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Board.