Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules 52441 

c. Adding paragraph (i)(3). 

The revisions and addition read as 

follows: 

§ 1.12 Maintenance of minimum financial 

requirements by futures commission 

merchants and introducing brokers. 

(a) * * * 

(2) Provide together with such notice 

documentation in such form as 

necessary to adequately reflect the 

applicant’s or registrant’s capital 

condition as of any date such person’s 

adjusted net capital is less than the 

minimum required. The applicant or 

registrant must provide similar 

documentation for other days as the 

Commission may request. 

* * * * * 

(i)(1) Every notice and written report 

required to be given or filed by this 

section (except for notices required by 

paragraph (f) of this section) by a futures 

commission merchant or a selfregulatory organization must be filed 

with the regional office of the 

Commission with jurisdiction over the 

state in which the registrant’s principal 

place of business is located, with the 

principal office of the Commission in 

Washington, DC, with the designated 

self-regulatory organization, if any, and 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission, if such registrant is a 

securities broker or dealer. Every notice 

and written report required to be given 

or filed by this section by an applicant 

for registration as a futures commission 

merchant must be filed with the 

National Futures Association (on behalf 

of the Commission), with the designated 

self-regulatory organization, if any, and 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission, if such applicant is a 

securities broker or dealer. Any notice 

or report filed with the National Futures 

Association pursuant to this paragraph 

shall be deemed for all purposes to be 

filed with, and to be the official record 

of, the Commission. 

* * * * * 

(3) Every notice or report required to 

be provided in writing to the 

Commission under this section may, in 

lieu of facsimile, be filed via electronic 

transmission using a form of user 

authentication assigned in accordance 

with procedures established by or 

approved by the Commission, and 

otherwise in accordance with 

instructions issued by or approved by 

the Commission. Any such electronic 

submission must clearly indicate the 

registrant or applicant on whose behalf 

such filing is made and the use of such 

user authentication in submitting such 

filing will constitute and become a 

substitute for the manual signature of 

the authorized signer. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC on October 6, 

2009 by the Commission. 

David A. Stawick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–24480 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0620; FRL–8957–1] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, San Diego Air 

Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the San Diego Air Pollution 

Control District portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from cold 

solvent cleaning and vapor degreasing 

operations. We are proposing to approve 

two local rules to regulate these 

emission sources under the Clean Air 

Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the 

Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by November 12, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2009–0620, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through http://

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http:// 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send e-mail 

directly to EPA, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the public comment. 

If EPA cannot read your comment due 

to technical difficulties and cannot 

contact you for clarification, EPA may 

not be able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://www.regulations.gov and in hard 

copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California. While 

all documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4126, law.nicole@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: SDAPCD Rule 67.6.1 and 

SDAPCD Rule 67.6.2. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving these local 

rules in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: August 21, 2009. 

Laura Yoshii, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. E9–24454 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS