alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, David C. Weavil, in my
individual capacity and as Director of Unilab Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration statements for the filing of
securities of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") and any and all filings made by or on behalf of the Company
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 12th day of March 1997.

                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 David C. Weavil
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

      ( print page 51658)    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 17, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24098 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 261b.12 Procedures for inspection and obtaining copies of transcriptions and minutes. ( a ) Any person may inspect or copy a transcript, a recording or transcription of a recording, or minutes described in § 261b.11(c) of this part.
( b ) Requests for copies of transcripts, recordings or transcriptions of recordings, or minutes described in § 261b.11(c) of this part shall specify the meeting or the portion of meeting desired and shall be submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Board, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. Copies of documents identified in minutes may be made available to the public upon request under the provisions of 12 CFR part 261 (Rules Regarding Availability of Information).
§ 252.53 Applicability. ( a ) *Scope* — ( 1 ) *Applicability.* Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(3) and (b) of this section, this subpart applies to any covered company, which includes: ( i ) Any global systemically important BHC;
( ii ) Any Category II bank holding company;
( iii ) Any Category III bank holding company;
( iv ) Any Category II U.S. intermediate holding company subject to this section pursuant to § 252.153;
( v ) Any Category III U.S. intermediate holding company subject to this section pursuant to § 252.153; and
( vi ) Any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board that is made subject to this section pursuant to a rule or order of the Board.
( 2 ) *Ongoing applicability.* ( i ) A bank holding company (including any successor company) that is subject to any requirement in this subpart shall remain subject to any such requirement unless and until the bank holding company: ( A ) Is not a global systemically important BHC;
( B ) Is not a Category II bank holding company; and
( C ) Is not a Category III bank holding company.
( ii ) A U.S. intermediate holding company (including any successor company) that is subject to any requirement in this subpart shall remain subject to any such requirement unless and until the U.S. intermediate holding company: ( A ) Is not a Category II U.S. intermediate holding company; and
( B ) Is not a Category III U.S. intermediate holding company.
( 3 ) *Insurance bank holding companies.* Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph (a), this subpart does not apply to a covered company that is a bank holding company that is subject to part 217, subpart J, of this chapter.
( b ) *Transitional arrangements.* ( 1 ) A company that becomes a covered company on or before September 30 of a calendar year must comply with the requirements of this subpart beginning on January 1 of the second calendar year after the company becomes a covered company, unless that time is extended by the Board in writing.
( 2 ) A company that becomes a covered company after September 30 of a calendar year must comply with the requirements of this subpart beginning on January 1 of the third calendar year after the company becomes a covered company, unless that time is extended by the Board in writing.
[84 FR 59107, Nov. 1, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 82980, Nov. 27, 2023]
PUBLIC LAW 110–31—JUNE 1, 2007 121 STAT. 221

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 625:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Apr. 23, considered and passed House.

May 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–31

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4230 Maine

Avenue in Baldwin Park, California, as the ‘‘Atanacio Haro-Marin Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ATANACIO HARO-MARIN POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 4230 Maine Avenue in Baldwin Park, California,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Atanacio Haro-Marin Post

Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Atanacio Haro-Marin Post Office’’.

Approved June 1, 2007.

June 1, 2007

[H.R. 625]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3059 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3059

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
304 West Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkansas, as the ``Lloyd L. Burke 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 304 
West Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lloyd L. Burke Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lloyd L. Burke Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ching Lung Po, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Resources Development, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 15, 2004



/s/ Ching Lung Po



Chief Executive Officer
Order entered March 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00880-CR

TRAVARUS ANTWAUN SHEAD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-55887-W

ORDER

The Court ORDERS Darline King LaBar to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 6, a CD, and 17, a CD of jail 

calls.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

Darline King LaBar, official court reporter, 363rd Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
# C_2008239EN.01002001.xml

| 18.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 5 March 2008

in Case E-6/07

HOB vín ehf. and Faxaflóahafnir sf.

(Port charges — Charges having equivalent effect to customs duties — Internal taxation — Free movement of goods)

(Port charges — Charges having equivalent effect to customs duties — Internal taxation — Free movement of goods)

(2008/C 239/09)

In Case E-6/07 between HOB vín ehf. and Faxaflóahafnir sf. — Request to the Court by Hæstiréttur Íslands (the Supreme Court of Iceland), concerning rules on free movement of goods within the EEA, the Court, composed of Henrik Bull, Judge-Rapporteur, Carl Baudenbacher, President and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judge, gave judgment on 5 March 2008, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | the levying of charges for port services provided by a partnership owned by several municipalities falls to be assessed under Article 14 EEA if there is no alternative port to those of the partnership within the area normally served by those ports; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the levying of charges for port services provided by a partnership owned by several municipalities falls to be assessed under Article 14 EEA if there is no alternative port to those of the partnership within the area normally served by those ports;

| 2. | a port charge such as the one at issue does not constitute discrimination contrary to Article 14 EEA of imported alcoholic beverages in relation to domestic alcoholic beverages as long as the reason why only imported alcoholic beverages become subject to the charge is the fact that domestic alcoholic beverages are not transported by sea and so do not need port services, and the body setting the tariff for the port services does not set the tariff for comparable services needed in relation to domestic alcoholic beverages.
  In order for such a charge to violate Article 14 EEA by discriminating imported alcoholic beverages in relation to domestic non-alcoholic beverages, the charge must have the effect, on the market in question, of reducing potential consumption of the imported products to the advantage of competing domestic products. |
| --- | --- |

2.

a port charge such as the one at issue does not constitute discrimination contrary to Article 14 EEA of imported alcoholic beverages in relation to domestic alcoholic beverages as long as the reason why only imported alcoholic beverages become subject to the charge is the fact that domestic alcoholic beverages are not transported by sea and so do not need port services, and the body setting the tariff for the port services does not set the tariff for comparable services needed in relation to domestic alcoholic beverages.

In order for such a charge to violate Article 14 EEA by discriminating imported alcoholic beverages in relation to domestic non-alcoholic beverages, the charge must have the effect, on the market in question, of reducing potential consumption of the imported products to the advantage of competing domestic products.

---
# C_2012154EN.01001601.xml

| 31.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/16

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2012/C 154/09

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 6/12/EMP |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration |
| Address | Postboks 5 St. Olavs plass |
| 0130 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 6/12/EMP

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

Address

Postboks 5 St. Olavs plass

0130 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.nav.no

Title of the aid measure

(Forskrift om forsøk med funksjonsassistanse i arbeidslivet)

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Regulation (EU) No 1363/2011

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/ad/xd-20111212-1363.html

Type of measure

Scheme

X

Duration

Scheme

From 1.1.2012 until 31.12.2013

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

X

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Large enterprises

X

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

Approximately NOK 30 million

For guarantees

NOK ... million

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers (Articles 40-42) | Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies (Article 40) | ... % | |
| Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies (Article 41) | ... % | |
| Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers (Article 42) | Documented additional costs for the assistant, for one year at the time | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers (Articles 40-42)

Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies (Article 40)

... %

Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies (Article 41)

... %

Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers (Article 42)

Documented additional costs for the assistant, for one year at the time

---
# L_2021186DE.01003401.xml

| 27.5.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 186/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 186/34

---

Berichtigung der Verfahrensordnung des EFTA-Gerichtshofs

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 179 vom 20. Mai 2021
  )

Im Anhang I auf Seite 60 unter dem zweiten Titel:

Anstatt:

„(2017/C154/09)“

muss es heißen:

„(2017/C 73/09)“.

---
42340.

#### ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. CANUP.

Franicum, Judge.

Stripping the petition of its conclusions, the only negligence charged against the defendant in this case is that it maintained on a paved parking area adjacent to its loading platform a mound of tar and gravel pavement about 3 to 4 inches high at its peak, covering an area about equal to the size of a pickup truck, and sloping from the peak outwardly to the general level of the whole parking area. It was alleged that the plaintiff, after having parked his truck adjacent to the loading platform and after taking delivery of an order of merchandise from the defendant, while attempting to descend from the platform to the ground, placed his foot on *153the sloping surface of the aforesaid mound of tar and gravel, and that the slope of the mound caused his foot to slip, throwing him to the pavement and fracturing his right ankle.

*Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*

Argued October 4, 1966

Decided February 3, 1967.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Donald M. Fain,*for appellant.

*Sam J. Welsch,*for appellee.

As has been said often by this court, liability for negligence must be predicated upon foreseeability, that is, it must appear that the alleged negligent condition was such as to put an ordinarily prudent person on notice that some injury might result therefrom. *Misenhamer v. Pharr,*99 Ga. App. 163, 167 (2) (107 SE2d 875). Accordingly, where the allegations of the petition show that the defect, if any, in the premises alleged to have caused plaintiff’s injury “was so slight that no careful or prudent man would reasonably anticipate any danger from its existence” *(McCrory Stores Corp. v. Ahern,*65 Ga. App. 334, 337 (15 SE2d 797)), no cause of action is set forth. See *Roberts v. Wicker,*213 Ga. 352, 355 (99 SE2d 84). Paraphrasing the language used by the Supreme Court of South Dakota in Keen v. City of Mitchell, 37 S. D. 247 (157 NW 1049): Owners of premises whereon the public is invited to come are not required to- keep their parking lots and other such areas free from irregularities and trifling defects. See *Sanders v. Jefferson Furn. Co.,*111 Ga. App. 59 (140 SE2d 550), and cases cited therein, wherein the courts of this state have clearly enunciated the rule that one coming upon such premises is not entitled to an absolutely smooth or level way of travel. See also *City of East Point v. Mason,*86 Ga. App. 832 (72 SE2d 787). The trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition which was made on the ground that it failed to set forth a cause of action against the defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2965 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2965

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes 
   imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

  Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Pomeroy) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes 
   imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Trust Fund Recovery Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. ALL ALCOHOL FUELS TAXES TRANSFERRED TO HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 9503(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to certain taxes not transferred to Highway Trust Fund) 
is amended--
            (1) by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (C),
            (2) by striking the comma at the end of subparagraph 
        (D)(iii) and inserting a period, and
            (3) by striking subparagraphs (E) and (F).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxes received in the Treasury after September 30, 2003.
                                 <all>
```