### 18490 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

77 SR–NYSE–2014–32 Approval Order.

78 Id. 79 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). the execution and replenishment of a

Reserve Size Order ensures that the process is indistinguishable to other Participants from the execution of an Order without Reserve Size followed by the entry of a new Order; this processing also ensures that only the displayed portion of the Reserve Size Order is treated as a Protected Quotation.

The Intermarket Sweep Order attribute is a function of Regulation NMS, which provides for an Order to execute without respect to Protected Quotations if it is designated as an ISO

and if one or more additional limit orders, as necessary, are routed to execute against the full displayed size of any Protected Quotation with a price that is superior to the price of the Order identified as an ISO. As recently reaffirmed by the Commission, Regulation NMS allows such additional orders to be routed by an exchange or by the Participant that enters the ISO. 77 Accordingly, the exchange receiving an ISO may accept the receipt of the Order as a representation that the Participant entering it has satisfied its obligations; provided, however, that the exchange

itself maintains a surveillance and enforcement program to verify that the Participant is not acting in violation of this requirement. For this reason, it is

also consistent with the Act for a Participant to designate an Order with a Time-in-Force longer than IOC, or an Order with functionality such as the Post-Only Order, as an ISO. 78 Specifically, attaching an ISO designation to such Order reflects a representation that the Participant has determined that Protected Quotations at the price of the Order have been eliminated, such that the Order is entitled to post and provide liquidity. In the case of a Post-Only Order, however, if the Order’s price is adjusted to avoid executing against an Order on the Exchange Book, the Exchange will not consider the ISO designation in determining whether the Post-Only Order’s limit price level is now open, since the Post-Only ISO itself is not actually posting at that price. Accordingly, in that circumstance the use of a Post-Only ISO cannot be used to open a price level to additional Orders unless the Exchange ascertains through market data provided by other exchanges that the price level actually is

open.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously stated, the Exchange is not proposing substantively to modify the operation of any of its current Order Types or Order Attributes or the operation of the System; rather, the proposed rule change is intended to provide more detail regarding the System’s functionality. The proposed rule change is not designed to address any competitive issues, but rather to provide additional specificity and transparency to Participants and the investing public regarding the Exchange’s Order Types, Order Attributes, and System functionality. Since the Exchange does not proposed substantively to modify the operation of Order Types, Order Attributes, or System functionality, the proposed changes will not impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s

Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

Written comments were neither

solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for

Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml ); or

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– BX–2015–015 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.

All submissions should refer to File

Number SR–BX–2015–015. This file

number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions

should refer to File Number SR–BX– 2015–015, and should be submitted on or before April 27, 2015.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 79
Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015–07750 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice: 9080]**

**Determination and Certification Under Section 490(b)(1)(A) of the Foreign**  **Assistance Act Relating to the Largest Exporting and Importing Countries of** 

**Certain Precursor Chemicals**

Pursuant to Section 490(b)(1)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, I hereby determine and certify that the top five exporting and importing countries and economies of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine (China, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, India,


### 18491 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

Indonesia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom) have cooperated fully with the United States, or have taken adequate steps on their own, to achieve full compliance with the goals and objectives established by the 1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.

This determination and certification shall be published in the Federal Register , and copies shall be provided to the Congress together with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification.

Dated: March 13, 2015.

Antony J. Blinken,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015–07845 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–17–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Approval of Noise Compatibility Program Update, Key West**  **International Airport, Key West, Florida**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its findings on the Noise Compatibility Program Update submitted by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners under the provisions of

49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq. (the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) and 14 CFR part 150. These findings are made in recognition of the description

of Federal and nonfederal responsibilities in Senate Report No. 96–52 (1980). On December 19, 2013,

the FAA determined that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted by the Monroe County Board of County

Commissioners under Part 150 were in compliance with applicable requirements. On March 11, 2015, the FAA approved the Key West International Airport Noise Compatibility Program Update. All of the recommendations of the program that requested FAA approval were approved. No program elements relating to new or revised flight procedures for noise abatement were proposed by the airport operator.

**DATES :**  The effective date of the FAA’s approval of the Key West International Airport Noise Compatibility Program Update is March 11, 2015. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Allan Nagy, Environmental Program Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Orlando, Florida 32822, phone number: (407) 812–6331. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at this same location by appointment with the above contact.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This

notice announces that the FAA has given its overall approval to the Noise Compatibility Program Update for Key West International Airport, effective March 11, 2015.

Under Section 47504 of the Act, an airport operator who has previously submitted a Noise Exposure Map may

submit to the FAA a Noise Compatibility Program which sets forth the measures taken or proposed by the airport Sponsor for the reduction of existing non-compatible land uses and prevention of additional non-compatible land uses within the area covered by the Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires such programs to be developed in

consultation with interested and affected parties including local communities, government agencies, airport users, and FAA personnel.

Each airport Noise Compatibility Program developed in accordance with Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 is a local program, not a Federal program. The FAA does not substitute its judgment for that of the airport Sponsor with respect to which

measures should be recommended for action. The FAA’s approval or disapproval of each specific measure proposed by an airport Sponsor in a Record of Approval (ROA) is determined by applying approval criteria prescribed in 14 CFR 150.35(b).

The Administrator approves programs under this part, if:

(1) It is found that the program measures to be implemented would not

create an undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce (including any unjust discrimination) and are reasonably consistent with achieving the goals of reducing existing noncompatible land uses around the airport and of preventing the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses;

(2) The program provides for revision if made necessary by the revision of the Noise Exposure Map (NEM); and

(3) Those aspects of programs relating to the use of flight procedures for noise control can be implemented within the period covered by the program and

without:

(i) Reducing the level of aviation safety provided; (ii) Derogating the requisite level of protection for aircraft, their occupants and persons and property on the ground;

(iii) Adversely affecting the efficient use and management of the Navigable Airspace and Air Traffic Control Systems; or

(iv) Adversely affecting any other powers and responsibilities of the Administrator prescribed by law or any other program, standard, or requirement

established in accordance with law.

Approval of a first time NCP or NCP Update is not a determination concerning the acceptability of land uses under Federal, state, or local law. Approval does not by itself constitute an FAA implementing action. A request for Federal action or approval to implement specific noise compatibility measures may be required, and an FAA decision on the request may require an environmental review of the proposed action. Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in the implementation of the program nor a determination that all measures covered by the program are eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. Where Federal funding is sought, requests for project grants must be submitted to the FAA Airports District Office in Orlando, Florida.

The Monroe County Board of County

Commissioners submitted to the FAA on October 29, 2013, the Noise Exposure Maps for the Key West International Airport. The Noise Exposure Maps were determined by FAA to be in compliance with applicable requirements on December 19, 2013. Notice of this determination was published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2013.

On September 15, 2014, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners submitted to the FAA the descriptions of the Sponsor’s proposed noise compatibility measures and other documentation produced during the Noise Compatibility Program Update study conducted from November, 2011 through February 11, 2015.

The Key West International Airport study contains a proposed Noise Compatibility Program Update comprised of actions designed for phased implementation by airport management and adjacent jurisdictions from September 15, 2014 beyond the year 2015. It was requested that FAA evaluate and approve this material as a Noise Compatibility Program Update as

described in Section 47504 of the Act. The FAA began its review of the Noise Compatibility Program Update on September 15, 2014, and was required by provisions of the Act to approve or disapprove the program within 180 days