alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 69 FR 77616, Dec. 28, 2004.

#### § 30.2 Purpose.

Section 39 of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1831p-1, requires the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish safety and soundness standards. Pursuant to section 39, a national bank or Federal savings association may be required to submit a compliance plan if it is not in compliance with a safety and soundness standard prescribed by guideline under section 39(a) or (b). An enforceable order under section 8 of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1818(b), may be issued if, after being notified that it is in violation of a safety and soundness standard prescribed under section 39, the national bank or Federal savings association fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan. This part establishes procedures for requiring submission of a compliance plan and issuing an enforceable order pursuant to section 39. The Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness are set forth in appendix A to this part, and the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Information Security Standards are set forth in appendix B to this part. The OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Residential Mortgage Lending Practices are set forth in appendix C to this part. The OCC Guidelines Establishing Heightened Standards for Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches are set forth in appendix D to this part. The OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches are set forth in appendix E to this part.

[60 FR 35680, July 10, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 55488, Oct. 15, 1998; 64 FR 52641, Sept. 30, 1999; 66 FR 8633, Feb. 1, 2001; 70 FR 6332, Feb. 7, 2005; 79 FR 54543, Sept. 11, 2014; 81 FR 66800, Sept. 29, 2016]
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

ruCK PERRY GOVERNOR
June 24, 2011

Alfredo "AI" Armendariz, Ph.D. Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 RE: Proposed Listing ofthe US Oil Recovery Site onthe federal National Priorities List Dear Dr. Armendariz: Texas supports the decision thatthe US Oil Recovery site be considered as a candidate site for the federal National Priorities List (NPL) for cleanup. The Texas Commission on Environmental Qualitybelieves thatthis site is eligible for the proposedNPL listing based on agency evaluationofthe siteunder the federal Hazard Ranking System.

# ~~J Rick Perry Governor RP:tbp
cc: Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman, TCEQ Mark R. Vickery, P.G., Executive Director, TCEQ Mr. John Sadlier, Deputy Director, Office ofCompliance and Enforcement, TCEQ Mr. BrentWade, Director, Remediation Division, TCEQ Mr. Sam Coleman, Superfund Division Director, EPA Ms. Wren Stenger, SuperfundAssociate Director, EPA Mr. John Meyer, ChiefRisk and Site Assessment, EPA Ms. BrendaNixon Cook, Region 6, NPL Coordinator, EPA

POST OFFICE Box 12428 AUSITN, TEXAS 78711 (512)463-2000 (VorCE)/DlAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES VISIT WWW.TEXASONUNE.COM mE OFFICIAL WEB SrIT OF THE STAlE OF TEXAS
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-57230) and related prospectus of Turbosonic Technologies, Inc.
for the registration of 900,000 shares of its common stock and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-57248) pertaining to the Turbosonic Technologies,
Inc. 2000 Stock Plan of our report dated September 5, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Turbosonic Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended June 30, 2003 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB).


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
September 29, 2003
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
EXHIBIT 10.16
                                  -------------

                                 Promissory Note


                                NEGOTIABLE PAPER

     March 7, 1994

     $100,000.00

     18  Months  after  date  form  value   received   American  Fire  Retardant
Corporation  promise to pay to the order of Edward E. Friloux,  Sr., One Hundred
Thousand  Dollars at Demand with 5% interest  per annum from March 7, 1994 until
paid.

     And in the event  default is made in the  payment of this note at  maturity
and it is placed in the hands of an attorney for  collection  or suit is brought
on the same,  then an  additional  amount of 5% (five per cent) on the principal
and interest of this note shall be added to the same as collection fees.



                                                  American Fire Retardant Corp.

                                                  /s/ Stephen F. Owens
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  By:  Stephen F. Owens
                                                  Its: President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                             141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,789
<PP&E>                                          52,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,938
<BONDS>                                         20,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,955
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,209
<SALES>                                        210,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,200
<CGS>                                          152,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (450)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly consoldiated financial statements of UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such contained in UNUM 
Corporation's SEC Form 10-Q dated March 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         9,301,400
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      25,000
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,149,900
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  225,900
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              11,540,900
<CASH>                                          42,800
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             439,700
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,162,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,746,500
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,605,500
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,722,200
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                601,300
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,241,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,746,500
<PREMIUMS>                                     768,100
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            209,700
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,500
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  20,100
<BENEFITS>                                     582,900
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (20,000)<F1>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>This item contains the amounts of deferred and amortized policy acquisition
costs for the period presented.
<F2>Restated to reflect two-for-one common stock split completed June 2, 1997.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
42307.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. McCOMMONS, Executrix.

*Frankum, P. J., concurs. Felton, C. J., concurs in the judgment.*

Argued September 9, 1966

Decided February 20, 1967.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, D. Field Yow, L. Clifford Adams, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, Lon L. Fleming,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Knox, Warren D. Evans,*for appellee.

Pannell, Judge.

1. The verdict of the jury was amply supported by competent evidence of the value- of the land taken and competent evidence as to consequential damages to the remainder occasioned thereby.

2. There was ample evidence showing that the tract of 260 acres of which approximately 25 acres was taken splitting the tract into two parcels divided by the non-access highway, was suited for, and had recently been used for, a dairy; and that 70 acres of the tract were suitable for residential development, of which 70 acres 11 acres were included in those taken. The several charges relating to considering the value of the land for uses other than the use at the time of taking, were neither argumentative, nor did they unduly stress the other uses testified about, to an extent harmful to appellant.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2010314EN.01000501.xml

| 18.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/5

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 314/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 14 July 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 57847 |
| Decision number | : | 326/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Section 4-23-6(4) of the Norwegian Customs Regulation |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) EEA |
| Type of measure | : | Tax exemption |
| Economic sector | : | Ferry services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| PO Box 8008 Dep. |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

14 July 2010

Case number

:

57847

Decision number

:

326/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Section 4-23-6(4) of the Norwegian Customs Regulation

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) EEA

Type of measure

:

Tax exemption

Economic sector

:

Ferry services

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

PO Box 8008 Dep.

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2020023EN.01000501.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/5

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 23/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20 November 2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 84333 |
| Decision No | 079/19/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | All |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Amendments and a prolongation of the employee share options tax scheme |
| Legal basis | Norwegian Tax Act Section 5-14 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Aid to small and micro-enterprises |
| Form of aid | Tax exemption |
| Budget | NOK 570 million annually (total budget of scheme as amended) |
| Duration | 2020-2029 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance
  P.O Box 8008 Dep
  N-0030 Oslo
  NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

20 November 2019

Case No

84333

Decision No

079/19/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

All

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Amendments and a prolongation of the employee share options tax scheme

Legal basis

Norwegian Tax Act Section 5-14

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Aid to small and micro-enterprises

Form of aid

Tax exemption

Budget

NOK 570 million annually (total budget of scheme as amended)

Duration

2020-2029

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance

P.O Box 8008 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
Page 1 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 2 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 3 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 4 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 5 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 6 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 7 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 8 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 9 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 10 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 11 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 12 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 13 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 14NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 15 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 16 NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 17NON-CBI SUBMISSIONPage 18 NON-CBI SUBMISSION
§ 239.16 Voluntary dissolution. ( a ) A mutual holding company's board of directors may propose a plan for dissolution of the mutual holding company. All references in this section to mutual holding company shall also apply to a subsidiary holding company organized under this part. The plan may provide for either: ( 1 ) Transfer of all the mutual holding company's assets to another mutual holding company or home-financing institutions under Federal charter either for cash sufficient to pay all obligations of the mutual holding company and retire all outstanding accounts or in exchange for that mutual holding company's payment of all the mutual holding company's outstanding obligations and issuance of share accounts or other evidence of interest to the mutual holding company's members on a *pro rata* basis; or
( 2 ) Dissolution in a manner proposed by the directors which they consider best for all concerned.
( b ) The plan, and a statement of reasons for proposing dissolution and for proposing the plan, shall be submitted to the appropriate Reserve Bank for approval. The Board will approve the plan if the Board believes dissolution is advisable and the plan is best for all concerned. If the Board considers the plan inadvisable, the Board may either make recommendations to the mutual holding company concerning the plan or disapprove it. When the plan is approved by the mutual holding company's board of directors and by the Board, it shall be submitted to the mutual holding company's members at a duly called meeting and, when approved by a majority of votes cast at that meeting, shall become effective. After dissolution in accordance with the plan, a certificate evidencing dissolution, supported by such evidence as the Board may require, shall immediately be filed with the Board. When the Board receives such evidence satisfactory to the Board, it will terminate the corporate existence of the dissolved mutual holding company and the mutual holding company's charter shall thereby be canceled.
§ 252.46 Review of the Board's analysis; publication of summary results. ( a ) *Review of results.* Based on the results of the analysis conducted under this subpart, the Board will conduct an evaluation to determine whether the covered company has the capital, on a total consolidated basis, necessary to absorb losses and continue its operation by maintaining ready access to funding, meeting its obligations to creditors and other counterparties, and continuing to serve as a credit intermediary under baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios, and any additional scenarios.
( b ) *Publication of results by the Board.* ( 1 ) The Board will publicly disclose a summary of the results of the Board's analyses of a covered company by June 30 of the calendar year in which the stress test was conducted pursuant to § 252.44.
( 2 ) The Board will notify companies of the date on which it expects to publicly disclose a summary of the Board's analyses pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section at least 14 calendar days prior to the expected disclosure date.
[Reg. YY, 79 FR 64049, Oct. 27, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 9329, Feb. 3, 2017]
# C_2012010EN.01000501.xml

| 12.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/5

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 10/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 13 July 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 69800 |
| Decision number | : | 231/11/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Municipality of Tromsø |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Rapid deployment of a next generation access network in rural areas of the municipality of Tromsø |
| Objective | : | Rapid deployment of broadband networks |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant and exemption from payment of certain charges for usage of existing electricity masts |
| Budget | : | Approximately NOK 94 000 000 |
| Intensity | : | Approximately 75 % |
| Economic sectors | : | Electronic communications |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Tromsø municipality |
| Rådhuset |
| PO Box 6900 |
| 9299 Tromsø |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

13 July 2011

Case number

:

69800

Decision number

:

231/11/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

:

Municipality of Tromsø

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Rapid deployment of a next generation access network in rural areas of the municipality of Tromsø

Objective

:

Rapid deployment of broadband networks

Form of aid

:

Direct grant and exemption from payment of certain charges for usage of existing electricity masts

Budget

:

Approximately NOK 94 000 000

Intensity

:

Approximately 75 %

Economic sectors

:

Electronic communications

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Tromsø municipality

Rådhuset

PO Box 6900

9299 Tromsø

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0113

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DARRELL DWAYNE SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including July 2, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2020

05/28/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0113
Pages 63 through 88 are being withheld in their entirety 

in accordance with the FOIA under exemptions 

 (b)(6) and (b)(7)(C)
§ 226.25 Record retention. ( a ) *General rule.* A creditor shall retain evidence of compliance with this regulation (other than advertising requirements under §§ 226.16 and 226.24) for 2 years after the date disclosures are required to be made or action is required to be taken. The administrative agencies responsible for enforcing the regulation may require creditors under their jurisdictions to retain records for a longer period if necessary to carry out their enforcement responsibilities under section 108 of the act.
( b ) *Inspection of records.* A creditor shall permit the agency responsible for enforcing this regulation with respect to that creditor to inspect its relevant records for compliance.