alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


                       AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO OPTION AGREEMENT


     This Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreement, dated as of October __, 1996, is
entered into by and between Decora Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Optionor"), and Nathan Hevrony ("Optionee").

                                    RECITALS

     A. Optionee has performed numerous valuable services for Optionor over the
past several years, including serving as it's Chief Executive Officer and as a
director.

     B. Optionor has, as compensation for such services, issued to Optionee, an
option to purchase 750,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of
$1.12 per share (the "Option"), pursuant to the terms of an Option Agreement by
and between Optionor and Optionee, dated as of January 7, 1992 (the "Option
Agreement'), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by
reference.

     C. The Option is set to expire on December 30, 1996, and both parties
believe it is in their respective best interests to amend the Option Agreement
to extend the expiration date of the Option.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     Amendment of Expiration Date. Section 2.A of the Option Agreement is hereby
amended to read as follows:

         "A. From December 30, 1991, and up until and including December 30,
         1999, Optionee shall have the right and option to purchase, at $1.12
         per share, and Optionor shall have the obligation to issue to Optionee,
         750,000 shares of the authorized but unissued common shares of
         Optionor."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to
Option Agreement as of the date first written above.

OPTIONOR                                             OPTIONEE

DECORA INDUSTRIES, INC.
a Delaware corporation


/s/ Nathan Hevrony                                   /s/ Nathan Hevrony
-----------------------------                        -------------------------
By:  Nathan Hevrony                                      Nathan Hevrony
     Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021058EN.01005001.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/50

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 58/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15 October 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85649 |
| Decision No | 118/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Prolongation of guarantee scheme for airlines |
| Legal basis | The Parliamentary Decision authorising the Guarantee scheme, in accordance with conditions proposed by the Ministry |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | The purpose of the guarantee scheme is to alleviate the liquidity shortage faced by the airline industry and ensure that disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak do not undermine the airlines’ viability. |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | Estimated NOK 6 billion |
| Duration | 31 December 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Airline industry |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency |
| Pb 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

15 October 2020

Case No

85649

Decision No

118/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Prolongation of guarantee scheme for airlines

Legal basis

The Parliamentary Decision authorising the Guarantee scheme, in accordance with conditions proposed by the Ministry

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

The purpose of the guarantee scheme is to alleviate the liquidity shortage faced by the airline industry and ensure that disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak do not undermine the airlines’ viability.

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

Estimated NOK 6 billion

Duration

31 December 2020

Economic sectors

Airline industry

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency

Pb 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 27, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 27, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0241. GRANT NH, LLC et al. v. JONATHAN SULE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV2199
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 27, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00345-CR

LAANGELO TERRELL WOODS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-59224-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

LaAngelo Terrell Woods waived a jury and pleaded guilty to injury to a child/serious 

bodily injury. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.04(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed 

punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which 

he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements 

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the 

record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief 

to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro 
-2-

se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying 

duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140345F.U05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
-3-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

LAANGELO TERRELL WOODS, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00345-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-59224-V).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered March 27, 2015.
Home1996 Treaties and Agreements...Romania (96-1101) – Agreement Concerning Economic, Technical and Related Assistance

# 									Romania (96-1101) – Agreement Concerning Economic, Technical and Related Assistance							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 1, 1996

Foreign Assistance

Agreement signed at Bucharest October 24, 1995; entered into force November 1, 1996.
Download attachment						 [5 MB]

Tags

Foreign AssistanceRomania

Back to Top
# ZABEL 

# FREEMAN

September 30, 2015 HOUSTON OFFICE: 1135 HEIGHTS BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TEXAS 77008 PHONE: 713.802.9117 FACSIMILE: 713.802.9114 MIAMI OFFICE: ONE SOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE SUITE 3000 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 PHONE: 786.871.0211 FACSIMILE: 305.351.8316
Via Certified Mail 

### Mr. Christopher A. Prine Clerk, Fourteenth Court ofAppeals 301 Fannin Street, Room 245 Houston, Texas 77002 

### Re: Cause No. 01-15-00775-CV,Adriene Sibleyv. Seminole PipelineCompany, LLC, etal, in the First Court ofAppeals in Houston, Texas Dear Clerk: 

### This letter is to verify we have returned the enclosed Electronic Clerk's Record for the abovestyled case. 

### If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at713-802-9117.

Enclosures Respectfully, ZABEL FREEMAN



### SarahThorp/Legal Assistant9171 9690 0935 0105 8258 95



### 1135 Heights Boulevard Houston, Texas 77008 

### ChristopherA. Prine Clerk, Fourteenth Court Appeals 301 Fannin Street, Room 245 Houston, Texas 77002 neopostr 09/30/2015 rf*^^^ Ar.n FIRST-CLASS MAIL

ZIP 77008 041L10248236
#### COWLING V. VANDIVER GROCERY COMPANY.

(Decided June 28, 1913.)

Appeal from Lowndes Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. E. Gamble.

W. P. McGatjgh, for appellant. A. D. Pitts, for appellee.

Per curiam.

The question is moot and the appeal is dismissed.
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .
Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s of th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2011 - O/^ ^

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

BYTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKET 0ST-ZOU.OJ_f£O

_ACTIO N DAT E 

# i ^

2^/ / Thi s approval andgrant

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e a^Iicabie , t o condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i

» eficctiv e atk r

7 day s unles s apetitio n i s filedunde r 14 CF R385.3 0 o r

t i revie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s own motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e abov e prfi^edure , thgjM^yp^ij di n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived .



### 9 Augus t 201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Intemationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St . N.W.#12"'Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0043

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORY ANN RUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 4 2022

11/04/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0043
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3029

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ``S. Truett 
                     Cathy Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

   Mr. Scott of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Kingston, Mr. 
 Marshall, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Ms. 
 Majette, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Burns, Mr. Collins, Mr. Gingrey, 
 and Mr. Linder) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ``S. Truett 
                     Cathy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. S. TRUETT CATHY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the S. Truett 
Cathy Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015150EN.01000601.xml

| 7.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/6

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(2015/C 150/06)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Røros–Oslo v.v.
  Sogndal–Oslo v.v.
  Førde–Oslo v.v.
  Sandane–Oslo v.v.
  Sogndal–Bergen v.v.
  Førde–Bergen v.v.
  Sandane–Bergen v.v.
  Ørsta-Volda–Bergen v.v. |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 April 2016 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Ministry of Transport and Communications |
| PO Box 8010 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |
| Tel. +47 22248353 |
| postmottak@sd.dep.no |
| https://www.regjeringen.no/id2403287/ |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

Røros–Oslo v.v.

Sogndal–Oslo v.v.

Førde–Oslo v.v.

Sandane–Oslo v.v.

Sogndal–Bergen v.v.

Førde–Bergen v.v.

Sandane–Bergen v.v.

Ørsta-Volda–Bergen v.v.

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 April 2016

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Ministry of Transport and Communications

PO Box 8010 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22248353

postmottak@sd.dep.no

https://www.regjeringen.no/id2403287/

---
[Cite as State v. Noble, 2013-Ohio-5495.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2013-06-099 

: D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 12/16/2013 

: 

 

LEONARD JOSEPH NOBLE, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2013-03-0364 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 

High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee 

Fred S. Miller, Baden & Jones Bldg., 246 High Street, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendantappellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Leonard Joseph Noble, has filed a brief with 

this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 
Butler CA2013-06-099

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any 

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of 

error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the 

appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record 

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and 

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw 

as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that 

a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
§ 308.517 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ will conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to: ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 12 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 13 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this subpart.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to make any determinations regarding the validity of federal statutes or regulations or of directives, rules, resolutions, policies, orders or other such general pronouncements issued by the Corporation.
#### ROBERT E. KING ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellant, *Edwin Joseph O’Brien.*

For the respondents, *Congleton & McLaughlin.*

*130Per Curiam.

This judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Wolfs-Keil, Raffertt, Hague JJ. 12.

*For reversal*—None.
# C_2019378EN.01000601.xml

| 7.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/6

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

of 26 July 2019

in Case E-1/17 COSTS

Nettbuss AS v Konkurrenten.no AS

(Taxation of costs — Recoverable costs — Default interest)

(2019/C 378/05)

In Case E-1/17 COSTS, Nettbuss AS v Konkurrenten.no AS — APPLICATION for the taxation of costs awarded by the Court to Nettbuss AS in its order of 22 December 2017 in Case E-1/17 Konkurrenten.no v ESA [2017] EFTA Ct. Rep. 989, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Bernd Hammermann and Ola Mestad (ad hoc), Judges, gave order of 26 July 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The costs to be paid by Konkurrenten.no AS to Nettbuss AS are fixed at NOK 351 738. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The costs to be paid by Konkurrenten.no AS to Nettbuss AS are fixed at NOK 351 738.

| 2. | Default interest shall be due on the amount from the date of notification of the present order until the date of payment; the applicable interest rate shall be calculated on the basis of the Norwegian Central Bank’s policy rate in force on the first calendar day of the month in which payment is due, increased by three and a half percentage points. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Default interest shall be due on the amount from the date of notification of the present order until the date of payment; the applicable interest rate shall be calculated on the basis of the Norwegian Central Bank’s policy rate in force on the first calendar day of the month in which payment is due, increased by three and a half percentage points.

---
# C_2018155EN.01000901.xml

| 3.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/9

---

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland and Norway

(Annuls and replaces the text published in OJ C 137, 16.5.2013, p. 4 and EEA Supplement No 27, 16.5.2013, p. 7.)

(Annuls and replaces the text published in OJ C 137, 16.5.2013, p. 4 and EEA Supplement No 27, 16.5.2013, p. 7.)

(2018/C 155/05)

In accordance with Article 1 of Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters (1), as incorporated in point 54zzzzd of Chapter XII of Annex II of the EEA Agreement, a list of recognised natural mineral waters shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement thereto.

1

Official Journal of the European Union

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland

| Trade Name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Icelandic Glacial | Ölfus Spring | Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss |

Trade Name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Icelandic Glacial

Ölfus Spring

Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Norway

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Norway

| Trade Name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bonaqua Silver | Telemark kilden | Fyresdal |
| Eira | Eira kilden | Eresfjord |
| Farris | Kong Olavs kilde | Larvik |
| Isbre | Isbre kilden | Buhaugen, Osa, Ulvik |
| Isklar | Isklar kildene | Vikebygd i Ullensvang |
| Modal | Modal kilden | Fyresdal |
| Olden | Blåfjell kilden | Olderdalen |
| Osa | Osa kilden | Ulvik/Hardanger |
| Rustad Spring | Rustad kilden | Rustad/Elverum |
| Snåsa | Snåsakilden | Snåsa |
| Voss Sparkling | Vosskilden | Vatnestrøm/Iveland |

Trade Name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Bonaqua Silver

Telemark kilden

Fyresdal

Eira

Eira kilden

Eresfjord

Farris

Kong Olavs kilde

Larvik

Isbre

Isbre kilden

Buhaugen, Osa, Ulvik

Isklar

Isklar kildene

Vikebygd i Ullensvang

Modal

Modal kilden

Fyresdal

Olden

Blåfjell kilden

Olderdalen

Osa

Osa kilden

Ulvik/Hardanger

Rustad Spring

Rustad kilden

Rustad/Elverum

Snåsa

Snåsakilden

Snåsa

Voss Sparkling

Vosskilden

Vatnestrøm/Iveland

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 45.

1

---