alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gelu Voicu, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of CatalystSemiconductor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respectsthe financial condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.

Date: July 31, 2006

|        | By:    | /s/ GELU VOICU                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Gelu Voicu                                |
|   |   | Title: *President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

I, Thomas E. Gay III,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.

Date: July 31, 2006

|        | By:    | /s/ THOMAS E.  GAY III                                                              |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Thomas E. Gay III                                                        |
|   |   | Title: *Vice  President of Finance and  Administration and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
# C_2009150EN.01000801.xml

| 2.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/8

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

2009/C 150/10

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following aid measure:

Date of adoption of the decision:

Case number: 63992

EFTA State: Norway

Region: —

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary): Carbon capture and storage project at Kårstø, Norway. Beneficiary: Gassnova SF.

Legal basis: Articles 61(1) and 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure: Grant

Objective: Protection of the environment by means of capturing, transporting and storing CO2

2

Form of aid: Contribution of funds

Budget: —

Intensity: 100 % investment and operating aid

Duration: 10 years

Economic sectors: Carbon capture and storage in the context of power production

Name and address of the granting authority:

| The Norwegian State |
| --- |
| Ministry of Government Administration and Reform |
| Akersgata 59 |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

The Norwegian State

Ministry of Government Administration and Reform

Akersgata 59

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information: —

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
## IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS District of St. Thomas/St. John
AAC-Air Ambulance Caribbean, Inc., d./b/a Aeromd, Plaintiff v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company et al, Defendant. Case Number: ST-2023-CV-00267 Action:Breach of Contract



## NOTICE of ENTRY of Order To: Ryan C. Meade, Esq. Sheena Conway, Esq. Eric Andrew Hiller, Esq. Maria T. Hodge, Esq.

Please take notice that on March 20, 2024 a(n) Memorandum Opinion and Order

dated March 19, 2024 was/were entered by the Clerk in the above-titled matter.
Dated: March 20, 2024 Tamara Charles Clerk of the Court By:

Elizabeth A. David

Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2020339EN.01000201.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 22 July 2020 — Conseil national des centres commerciaux v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance, Ministre de la cohésion des territoires et des relations avec les collectivités territoriales

(Case C-325/20)

(2020/C 339/02)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Conseil national des centres commerciaux

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance, Ministre de la cohésion des territoires et des relations avec les collectivités territoriales

Question referred

Must Article 14(6) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (1) be interpreted as meaning that it permits the presence, on a collegiate body responsible for issuing an opinion on the granting of a commercial operating permit, of a recognised expert describing the local economic fabric, whose role is limited to merely presenting the situation of the economic fabric in the relevant catchment area and the impact of the project on that economic fabric, without taking part in the vote on the permit application?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36.

---
# C_2022016EN.01000501.xml

| 13.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/5

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 16/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21 September 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87369 |
| Decision No | 218/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers |
| Legal basis | The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafarers |
| Form of aid | Tax and social security refunds |
| Budget | Increase of NOK 90 million |
| Duration | 1 July 2021 – 31 August 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Maritime transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Norwegian Maritime Authority |
| P.O. Box 2222 |
| N-5509 Haugesund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

21 September 2021

Case No

87369

Decision No

218/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers

Legal basis

The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafarers

Form of aid

Tax and social security refunds

Budget

Increase of NOK 90 million

Duration

1 July 2021 – 31 August 2021

Economic sectors

Maritime transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Norwegian Maritime Authority

P.O. Box 2222

N-5509 Haugesund

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket T-1-2009]


Foreign-Trade Zone 134--Chattanooga, TN; Application for 
Temporary/Interim Manufacturing Authority; Termination of Review; 
Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC (Motor 
Vehicles)

    Notice is hereby given that the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 
staff has terminated its review of the application requesting 
temporary/interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority withm FTZ 134 at the 
Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC (VGACO) 
facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The application was filed on July 
10, 2009 (74 FR 34714, 7-17-2009). Substantive comments submitted in 
opposition to the VGACO application during the public comment period 
remove the application from eligibility under the specific T/IM 
standard of ``clearly presenting no new, complex, or controversial 
issues'' (see ``Proposals to Facilitate the Use of Foreign-Trade Zones 
by Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers,'' 69 FR 17643, 4/5/2004). The 
review was terminated on September 22, 2009.

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Pierre V. Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23693 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
#### Robert Coble, Appellant, *v.*David Kesselgrau, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.

Louis S. Finn, for appellant.

Leopold W. Harburger, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

As it does not appear that the plaintiff knew what evidence the defendant would give in the replevin action, it cannot be said that it was incumbent upon him to call defendant as a witness in that action. Particularly is this so, in view of the fact that the defendant had notice of the action, and could have presented himself for examination as a witness, if he chose to do so.

Attention is called to the fact that there was no evidence that the payment for counsel fee was a reasonable charge for a necessary expenditure.

The judgment should have been in favor of the plaintiff.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification**
               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Elcom International, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, thatAmendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004(the “Form 10-KSB”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.        Dated: April 22, 2005 /s/ Laurence F. Mulhern   Laurence F. Mulhern   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022484EN.01003201.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/32

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/14)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Andorra

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Andorra

Subject of commemoration: The legend of Charlemagne

Description of the design: Legend has it that Emperor Charlemagne was the founder of Andorra in the year 805 and that he granted its inhabitants their own legal status. The design of the coin represents this legend deeply rooted in the history and culture of Andorra and shows, in its background, a landscape with mountains and a river, representing the rich scenery of our country, with the name of the issuing country ‘ANDORRA’. The foreground of the design depicts a partial reproduction of the well-known portrait of Emperor Charlemagne by the artist Albrecht Dürer and the year of issue ‘2022’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 70 000

Date of issue: Last quarter of 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
# C_2016467EN.01002401.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 467/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 467/24

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 27 October 2015

in Case E-11/15

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights)

(2016/C 467/11)

In Case E-11/15, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — Application for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7a, 7e and 7i of Annex XIX of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 27 October 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7a, 7e and 7i of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at points 7a, 7e and 7i of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00487-CR

Corey Chandler, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-DC-18-904055, THE HONORABLE P. DAVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E

A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he 

provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine 

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for 

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with 

this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial 

court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide 
2

written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was 

provided, on or before April 20, 2020. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on April 10, 2020.

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Do Not Publish
#### § 217.402 Identification as a global systemically important BHC.

A bank holding company is a global systemically important BHC if its method 1 score, as calculated under § 217.404, equals or exceeds 130 basis points. Subject to § 217.400(b)(2), a bank holding company must calculate its method 1 score on an annual basis by December 31 of each year.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

[VIALTA LETTERHEAD]


September 25, 2000

Mr. Alex B. Law
55 Stanton Court
Danville, CA 94506

Dear Mr. Law:

We are pleased to make the following offer of employment to you:

Position:             VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTENT
Department:           Content
Manager:              Fred Chan

Compensation:         $7,291.67 SEMI-MONTHLY ($175,000 ANNUALIZED).

Stock Options:        40,000 shares vested under the terms of the 4-year
                      Incentive Option Plan, subject to approval by the Board of
                      Directors at the next meeting.

Benefits:             Medical, Dental and Vision coverage is effective on your
                      start date. HMO coverage is paid in full for the employee.
                      PPO coverage requires a deduction from your paycheck.
                      Medical and dental coverage for eligible dependents is
                      available at 25% of cost.

Loan:                 The Company will LOAN $10,000 to be repaid over a 12 month
                      period at the rate of $834 per month or $417 per pay check
                      through payroll deduction. The interest rate to be at
                      7%per year, total interest of $350 to be paid at the end
                      of the 12 month period.

At-Will Basis:        Vialta is an at will employer in accordance with the laws
                      of the State of California. You are free to leave at any
                      time, and similarly, the Company can terminate your
                      employment, with or without cause, at any time.

Effective:            This offer will remain affective until September 28, 2000.

Start Date:           ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 9, 2000.

New hire orientation is held every Monday at 8:30 AM (please bring all required
employment eligibility documents).

Mr. Law, we look forward to a positive response to our offer and to a mutually
beneficial, professional relationship. Please indicate your acceptance by your
signature and start date below.



/s/ Fred Chan                              /s/ Alex B. Law
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Fred Chan                                  Alex B. Law
Chairman
                                           10/4/00
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Start Date
§ 252.88 Exclusion of certain QFCs. ( a ) *Exclusion of QFCs with FMUs.* Notwithstanding § 252.82, a covered entity is not required to conform to the requirements of this subpart a covered QFC to which: ( 1 ) A CCP is party; or
( 2 ) Each party (other than the covered entity) is an FMU.
( b ) *Exclusion of certain excluded bank QFCs.* If a covered QFC is also a covered QFC under parts 47 or 382 of this title that an affiliate of the covered entity is also required to conform pursuant to parts 47 or 382 of this title and the covered entity is: ( 1 ) The affiliate credit enhancement provider with respect to the covered QFC, then the covered entity is required to conform the credit enhancement to the requirements of this subpart but is not required to conform the direct QFC to the requirements of this subpart; or
( 2 ) The direct party to which the excluded bank is the affiliate credit enhancement provider, then the covered entity is required to conform the direct QFC to the requirements of this subpart but is not required to conform the credit enhancement to the requirements of this subpart.
( c ) *Exclusion of certain contracts.* Notwithstanding § 252.82, a covered entity is not required to conform the following types of contracts or agreements to the requirements of this subpart: ( 1 ) An investment advisory contract that: ( i ) Is with a retail customer or counterparty;
( ii ) Does not explicitly restrict the transfer of the contract (or any QFC entered pursuant thereto or governed thereby, or any interest or obligation in or under, or any property securing, any such QFC or the contract) from the covered entity except as necessary to comply with section 205(a)(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-5(a)(2)); and
( iii ) Does not explicitly provide a default right with respect to the contract or any QFC entered pursuant thereto or governed thereby.
( 2 ) A warrant that: ( i ) Evidences a right to subscribe to or otherwise acquire a security of the covered entity or an affiliate of the covered entity; and
( ii ) Was issued prior to November 13, 2017.
( d ) *Exemption by order.* The Board may exempt by order one or more covered entities from conforming one or more contracts or types of contracts to one or more of the requirements of this subpart after considering: ( 1 ) The potential impact of the exemption on the ability of the covered entity(ies), or affiliates of the covered entity(ies), to be resolved in a rapid and orderly manner in the event of the financial distress or failure of the entity that is required to submit a resolution plan;
( 2 ) The burden the exemption would relieve; and
( 3 ) Any other factor the Board deems relevant.