alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009058EN.01001101.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/11

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2009/C 58/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 10 December 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number: | 65709 |
| EFTA State: | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary): | Prolongation of the schemes relating to support to audiovisual productions and to support for film production companies until 1 July 2009 |
| Legal basis: | Regulation of 28 July 2005 on support to audiovisual productions and Regulation No 1017 of 18 September 2002 on film support to production companies |
| Type of measure: | Grants |
| Objective: | Promote culture |
| Form of aid: | Direct grants |
| Budget: | The overall budget of the Scheme relating to support to audiovisual productions is of approximately NOK 290 million per year.
  For the scheme on support to film production companies, funds are allocated through the general transfer to the Norwegian Film Fund |
| Duration: | Until 1 July 2009 |

Date of adoption of the decision:

Date of adoption of the decision:

10 December 2008

Case number:

Case number:

65709

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Prolongation of the schemes relating to support to audiovisual productions and to support for film production companies until 1 July 2009

Legal basis:

Legal basis:

Regulation of 28 July 2005 on support to audiovisual productions and Regulation No 1017 of 18 September 2002 on film support to production companies

Type of measure:

Type of measure:

Grants

Objective:

Objective:

Promote culture

Form of aid:

Form of aid:

Direct grants

Budget:

Budget:

The overall budget of the Scheme relating to support to audiovisual productions is of approximately NOK 290 million per year.

For the scheme on support to film production companies, funds are allocated through the general transfer to the Norwegian Film Fund

Duration:

Duration:

Until 1 July 2009

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority's website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
Special Term. —

Gholson J. presiding.

#### OHIO LIFE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY *v.*J. & S. H. GOODIN.

In an action on promissory note, against maters, not necessary under the Code to aver in petition that the defendants made, and that the plaintiff owns the note.

This was an action on a promissory note against the defendants as makers. The petition, after stating the style of the Court, and the names of the parties, was in this form.

“ Petition;

“The above named plaintiff states there is now due to her from the above named defendants the sum of thirty-two hundred dollars, with interest thereon, at the rate of six per centum per annum, from the seventeenth day of April, A. D. 1854, upon a certain promissory note, whereon this action is founded: a true copy whereof, with all credits, and the endorsement thereon, is herewith filed, marked 4038. And the said plaintiff further states, that the said defendants, James Goodin and Samuel IT. Goodin, partners, under the style of J. & S. IT. Goodin, are liable, upon the said note, as makers thereof & capial. Wherefore the said plaintiff demands judgment against the said defendants, for the said sum of thirty-two hundred dollars with interest thereon, at the rate of six per centum per annum, fromthe seventeenth day of April, A. D. 1854, and also for costs.”

The copy annexed to the petition was as follows;

“Copy of note, Exhibit 4033.

$3200. *Cincinnati, February*18th, 1854. Sixty days after date, we promise to pay to the order of John Goodin, thirty-two hundred dollars, payable at the Ohio Life and Trust Company Bank in this City, for value received.

Endorsed: J. & S. IT. Goodin.”

John Goodin.

James Goodin. .

*32Gholson, J.

The defendants demur, on the ground that the facts do not constitute a cause of action. The petition in this case is filed under section 122 of the Code. It contains all, and more than that section in express language says shall be sufficient. It is more full than the form prepared by the Commissioners in illustration of their meaning in framing the provisions of the Code. I shall certainly hold that it is sufficient.

I have been referred to some decisions in New York, on the analogous section of the Code of that State. The decisions on the subject, in that State, are contradictory. Some of them do hold, that an averment that the defendants made the note, and that the plaintiff ib owner or holder, where the fact does not appear from the copy of the note, are requisite. One of the cases would appear to sustain the point taken for the defendants in this case. But, as said in a recent work on the practice under the Code in New York, *(Voorhees’*Supplement,) those decisions overlook the fact that the allegation allowed by section 122 “is a brief way of stating all the facts which entitle the plaintiff to recover.”

Such is my conclusion, and I shall overrule the demurrer.
# C_2008175EN.01000701.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/7

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 f of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 175/09)

| Aid No | Aid to SME — 3/07 — Norway |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Name of company receiving individual aid | Unodrill AS |
| Legal basis | Norwegian Energy Fund Programme, category new technology |
| Overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | EUR 331 716 |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6), 5a and 5c of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 |
| Date of implementation | 15 September 2004 |
| Duration | Until 31 December 2007 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SME |
| Economic sectors concerned | Other services:






  — | cost effective drilling of hole to geothermal energy utilisation, |

Aid No

Aid to SME — 3/07 — Norway

EFTA State

Norway

Name of company receiving individual aid

Unodrill AS

Legal basis

Norwegian Energy Fund Programme, category new technology

Overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

EUR 331 716

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6), 5a and 5c of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004

Date of implementation

15 September 2004

Duration

Until 31 December 2007

Objective of aid

Aid to SME

Economic sectors concerned

Other services:

—

cost effective drilling of hole to geothermal energy utilisation,

| — | cost effective drilling of road tunnels (transport), |
| --- | --- |

—

cost effective drilling of road tunnels (transport),

| — | cost effective drilling for oil and gas |
| --- | --- |

—

cost effective drilling for oil and gas

Name and address of the granting authority

Enova SF

| Abelsgt. 5 |
| --- |
| N-7030 Trondheim |
| post@invanor.no |

Abelsgt. 5

N-7030 Trondheim

post@invanor.no

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
#### WARREN V. JENKINS, ET AL.

(Decided April 24, 1913.)

Appeal from Blount Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. E. Blackwood.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
Exhibit 10.8


 


Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation


Named Executive Officer Annualized Salaries


 


The table below summarizes
the annualized salaries of Horace Mann Educators Corporation's (the "Company") Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the other three highest compensated Executive Officers, as defined in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (collectively the "Named Executive Officers"). These salaries may be changed at any time at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Company. These are base salaries and do not include short-term
and long-term incentive compensation amounts, the Company's contributions to defined contribution plans and the Company's contributions
to other employee benefit programs on behalf of these individuals.


 





	Named Executive Officer	Annualized Salary
	Marita Zuraitis	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer	$750,000
	Dwayne D. Hallman	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$444,000
	Stephen P. Cardinal	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer	$429,000
	Matthew P. Sharpe	 
	Executive Vice President, Annuity & Life	$400,000
	John P. McCarthy	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	$300,000




 


Last revision date:
March 1, 2015


 




    	-1-
Note to Docket EPA - R10 - OAR - 2013 - 0005 regarding 80 FR 78372

We note that the aforementioned proposal included one typographical error and a clarification . On page 78375 in the section describing revisions to Division 240 of the Oregon Administrative Rules, we incor

rectly cited OAR 340 - 240 - 0110 in the list of revised sections when we should have cited OAR 340 - 240 - 0010 (80 FR 78372, at 78375). This error is non - substantive and does not affect the action. With regard to clarifications, the proposal noted that the Or egon submittal was December 14, 2012. The date on the submittal in the docket is December 12, 2012 and that date is referenced in this final rule.
# C_2009247EN.01001101.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/11

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has found that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2009/C 247/07

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 6 May 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 65114 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Incentive scheme for the establishment of new routes from Norwegian airports |
| Legal basis | : | 61(1) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Start up rebates, marketing assistance and assistance to Route Development Funds |
| Economic sectors | : | Airports |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

6 May 2009

Case number

:

65114

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Incentive scheme for the establishment of new routes from Norwegian airports

Legal basis

:

61(1) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

:

Start up rebates, marketing assistance and assistance to Route Development Funds

Economic sectors

:

Airports

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135611 & (46) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. BARBARA ANN PFENNINGER, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135611 

 COA: 272711 
 Bay CC: 05-007016-DM

GREGORY JOHN PFENNINGER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED. 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2021199EN.01000301.xml

| 27.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/3

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 199/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18 February 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86231 |
| Decision No | 011/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers |
| Legal basis | The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafarers |
| Form of aid | Tax and social security refunds |
| Budget | Increase of NOK 230 million |
| Duration | 1 January 2021 – 30 June 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Maritime transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Norwegian Maritime Authority |
| P.O.Box 2222 |
| N-5509 Haugesund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

18 February 2021

Case No

86231

Decision No

011/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers

Legal basis

The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafarers

Form of aid

Tax and social security refunds

Budget

Increase of NOK 230 million

Duration

1 January 2021 – 30 June 2021

Economic sectors

Maritime transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Norwegian Maritime Authority

P.O.Box 2222

N-5509 Haugesund

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2022006EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 January 2022

(2022/C 6/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1319 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83546 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2545 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0364 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9672 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,581 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 362,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5666 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9460 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,2446 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5600 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4399 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8227 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6597 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5340 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 354,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9369 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2087 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5190 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 263,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7466 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,713 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,7275 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,607 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4146 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1422 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,1610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1319

JPY

Japanese yen

131,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83546

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2545

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0364

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9672

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,581

HUF

Hungarian forint

362,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5666

RON

Romanian leu

4,9460

TRY

Turkish lira

15,2446

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5600

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4399

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8227

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6597

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5340

KRW

South Korean won

1 354,61

ZAR

South African rand

17,9369

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2087

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5190

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 263,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7466

PHP

Philippine peso

57,713

RUB

Russian rouble

85,7275

THB

Thai baht

37,607

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4146

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1422

INR

Indian rupee

84,1610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
42553.

#### GIDDENS et al. v. SUMNER et al.

*383Argued January 4, 1967

Decided March 13, 1967.

*Robinson, Thompson, Buice & Harben, B. Carl Buice,*for appellants.

*Telford, Wayne ■& Greer, Jeff C. Wayne,*for appellees.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, although the only judgment, ruling or order appealed from, is reviewable in this court. *Undercofler v. Grantham Transfer Co.,*222 Ga. 654 (151 SE2d 765).

2. “No suit to recover a debt due by the decedent shall be commenced against the administrator until the expiration of 12 months from his qualification.” *Code*§ 113-1526 (Ga. L. 1799, Cobb, 472). A claim for unliquidated damages in a tort action is such a “debt.” *Jones v. Womack,*53 Ga. App. 741 (187 SE 285); *Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Doyal,*84 Ga. App. 122, 126 (65 SE2d 432). A discharge by the court of ordinary of the administrators within the 12 months exemption period of *Code*§ 113-1526 would have the effect of permanently barring the right of action of the plaintiff tort claimants against the administrators for damages for injuries allegedly caused by the decedent’s negligence—a result clearly against public policy. Such a discharge, therefore, would constitute an irregularity sufficient to demand the re-opening of the estate, even if the discharge was obtained in accordance with all the requirements of *Code Ch.*113-23 as to notice, hearing, etc., a showing of fraud not being essential. *Hartford Accident &c. Co. v. Cohran,*106 Ga. App. 14, 15 (2) (126 SE2d 289).

3. While it does not appear in the record that the alleged order of the court of ordinary, discharging the defendant administrators prior to 12 months from their qualification, was before the superior court in the trial of the defendants’ de novo appeal from the judgment of the court of ordinary setting aside the above order, there remained in the case the issues of the existence and the date of the alleged order, the allegations as to which were denied by the defendants’ answer. However, since both parties concede that the administrators were discharged *384prior to 12 months from their qualification it would be a gesture of futility to try an issue which admittedly does not exist. Therefore we reverse the judgment denying the motion for a summary judgment.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
§ 207.1 Purpose and scope of this part. ( a ) *General.* This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y). That section requires any nongovernmental entity or person, insured depository institution, or affiliate of an insured depository institution that enters into a covered agreement to— ( 1 ) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate Federal banking agency; and
( 2 ) File an annual report with the appropriate Federal banking agency concerning the covered agreement.
( b ) *Scope of this part.* The provisions of this part apply to— ( 1 ) State member banks and their subsidiaries;
( 2 ) Bank holding companies;
( 3 ) Savings and loan holding companies;
( 4 ) Affiliates of bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies, other than banks, savings associations and subsidiaries of banks and savings associations; and
( 5 ) Nongovernmental entities or persons that enter into covered agreements with any company listed in paragraph (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
( c ) *Relation to Community Reinvestment Act.* This part does not affect in any way the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 *et seq.*), the Board's Regulation BB (12 CFR part 228), or the Board's interpretations or administration of that Act or regulation.
( d ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part.
( 2 ) Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issues that may arise in this part.
[Reg. G, 66 FR 2092, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended at 76 FR 56530, Sept. 13, 2011]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              BOWATER INCORPORATED
                        SALARIED EMPLOYEES' SAVINGS PLAN

         WHEREAS, Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), established the Bowater Incorporated Salaried Employees' Savings
Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan, to change a part of
the definition of "Change in Control" thereunder;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective February 26,
1999, as follows:

Section 18.03(a)(iv) is amended to read:

         "(iv)  the date on which less than 50% of the total membership of the
                Board consists of Continuing Directors."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bowater Incorporated has caused this Second
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 4th day of August,
1999.


                                     BOWATER INCORPORATED

                                     By: /s/ ANTHONY H. BARASH
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Anthony H. Barash


                                     Its: Sr. Vice President, Corporate Affairs
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          and General Counsel
                                          -------------------------------------