alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                      FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
(To be delivered on or before March 31 of each calendar year beginning with
March 31, 2004, pursuant to Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
referred to below)


                            CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA
                 -----------------------------------------------

                             CHASE USA MASTER TRUST
                   (formerly known as Providian Master Trust)

                 -----------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer ("Chase USA"), pursuant to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 1993, as amended and
restated as of February 5, 2002 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"),
among Card Acquisition Funding LLC as Transferor, Chase USA, as Servicer, and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.  Chase USA is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
    Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as
    set forth in the Agreement.

2.  The undersigned is a servicing officer who is duly authorized pursuant to
    the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

3.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended
    December 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted
    under my supervision.

4.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
    performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
    throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations
    has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

5.  The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
    Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to
    have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2003,
    which sets forth in detail (a) the nature of each such default, (b) the
    action taken by the Servicer, if any to remedy each such default and (c) the
    current status of each such default: NONE

                                        CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                        NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                        as Servicer


                                        By:    /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                        Title: Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-898]


Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Moats or Charles Riggle, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5047 or (202) 482-0650, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 8, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from the People's 
Republic of China (``PRC''). See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Administrative 
Review, 74 FR 27104 (June 8, 2009). This review covers the period June 
1, 2007, through May 31, 2008. The final results of review are 
currently due no later than October 6, 2009.

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), the Department shall issue the final results of 
an administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to 
complete the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act allows the Department to extend the time period to a maximum of 
180 days. Completion of the final results of this review within the 
120-day period is not practicable because the Department needs 
additional time to analyze and address complicated by-product and 
surrogate value issues for the final results. Because it is not 
practicable to complete this review within the time specified under the 
Act, we are extending the time period for issuing the final results of 
the administrative review by 30 days in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Therefore, the final results will be due 
Thursday, November 5, 2009, which is 150 days from publication of the 
preliminary results.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 
and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-24604 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24312]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of the Secretary


Determination of Total Amounts of Fiscal Year 2010 Tariff-Rate 
Quotas for Raw Cane Sugar and Certain Sugars, Syrups and Molasses; 
Correction

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Foreign Agricultural Service published a document in the 
Federal Register of September 29, 2009, providing notice of the 
establishment of the Fiscal Year (FY 2010) in-quota aggregate quantity 
of the raw, as well as, refined and specialty sugar Tariff-Rate Quotas 
(TRQ) as required under the U.S. World Trade Organization (WTO) 
commitments. The document contained an incorrect date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angel Gonzalez, (202) 720-2916.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 29, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-23447, 
on page 49848, in the second column, the 3rd sentence in last paragraph 
should read: ``The first tranche, totaling 1,656 MTRV, will open 
October 20, 2009.'' All other information remains unchanged.

    Signed at Washington, DC the 2nd day of October 2009.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
United States Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. E9-24312 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
§ 205.13 Administrative enforcement; record retention. ( a ) *Enforcement by federal agencies.* Compliance with this part is enforced by the agencies listed in Appendix B of this part.
( b ) *Record retention.* ( 1 ) Any person subject to the act and this part shall retain evidence of compliance with the requirements imposed by the act and this part for a period of not less than two years from the date disclosures are required to be made or action is required to be taken.
( 2 ) Any person subject to the act and this part having actual notice that it is the subject of an investigation or an enforcement proceeding by its enforcement agency, or having been served with notice of an action filed under sections 910, 915, or 916(a) of the act, shall retain the records that pertain to the investigation, action, or proceeding until final disposition of the matter unless an earlier time is allowed by court or agency order.
§ 24.4 Investment limits. ( a ) *Limits on aggregate outstanding investments.* A national bank's aggregate outstanding investments under this part may not exceed 5 percent of its capital and surplus, unless the bank is at least adequately capitalized and the OCC determines, by written approval of a written request by the bank to exceed the 5 percent limit, that a higher amount of investments will not pose a significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. In no case may a bank's aggregate outstanding investments under this part exceed 15 percent of its capital and surplus. When calculating the aggregate amount of its aggregate outstanding investments under this part, a national bank should follow generally accepted accounting principles, unless otherwise directed or permitted in writing by the OCC for prudential or safety and soundness reasons.
( b ) *Limited liability.* A national bank may not make an investment under this part that would expose the bank to unlimited liability.
[61 FR 49660, Sept. 23, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 70991, Dec. 20, 1999; 68 FR 48776, Aug. 15, 2003; 73 FR 22244, Apr. 24, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
     <LEGEND> This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
from the  Partnership's  unaudited  financial  statements  for the quarter ended
December  31,  1999  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  6,231
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,231
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         23,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      93
<BONDS>                                 9,011
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             14,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           23,402
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,543
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,646
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,646
<EPS-BASIC>                             12.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                           12.12


</TABLE>
#### § 303.3 General filing procedures.

Unless stated otherwise, filings should be submitted to the appropriate FDIC office. Forms and instructions for submitting filings may be obtained from any FDIC regional director. If no form is prescribed, the filing should be in writing; be signed by the applicant or a duly authorized agent; and contain a concise statement of the action requested. For specific filing and content requirements, consult the appropriate subparts of this part. The FDIC may require the applicant to submit additional information.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 69 FR 77616, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 30.6 Enforcement of orders. ( a ) *Judicial remedies.* Whenever a national bank or Federal savings association fails to comply with an order issued under section 39, the OCC may seek enforcement of the order in the appropriate United States district court pursuant to section 8(i)(1) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(1).
( b ) *Failure to comply with order.* Pursuant to section 8(i)(2)(A) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(A), the OCC may assess a civil money penalty against any national bank or Federal savings association that violates or otherwise fails to comply with any final order issued under section 39 and against any institution-affiliated party who participates in such violation or noncompliance.
( c ) *Other enforcement action.* In addition to the actions described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the OCC may seek enforcement of the provisions of section 39 or this part through any other judicial or administrative proceeding authorized by law.
[60 FR 35680, July 10, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 54544, Sept. 11, 2014]
§ 308.35 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) *Conduct of hearings.* Hearings must be conducted so as to provide a fair and expeditious presentation of the relevant disputed issues. Each party has the right to present its case or defense by oral and documentary evidence and to conduct such cross examination as may be required for full disclosure of the facts.
( 2 ) *Order of hearing.* Enforcement Counsel will present its case-in-chief first, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ, or unless otherwise expressly specified by law or regulation. Enforcement Counsel will be the first party to present an opening statement and a closing statement and may make a rebuttal statement after the respondent's closing statement. If there are multiple respondents, respondents may agree among themselves as to their order of presentation of their cases, but if they do not agree, the ALJ will fix the order.
( 3 ) *Examination of witnesses.* Only one counsel for each party may conduct an examination of a witness, except that in the case of extensive direct examination, the ALJ may permit more than one counsel for the party presenting the witness to conduct the examination. A party may have one counsel conduct the direct examination and another counsel conduct re-direct examination of a witness, or may have one counsel conduct the cross examination of a witness and another counsel conduct the re-cross examination of a witness.
( 4 ) *Stipulations.* Unless the ALJ directs otherwise, all stipulations of fact and law previously agreed upon by the parties, and all documents, the admissibility of which have been previously stipulated, will be admitted into evidence upon commencement of the hearing.
( b ) *Transcript.* The hearing must be recorded and transcribed. The reporter will make the transcript available to any party upon payment by that party to the reporter of the cost of the transcript. The ALJ may order the record corrected, either upon motion to correct, upon stipulation of the parties, or following notice to the parties upon the ALJ's own motion.
( c ) *Electronic presentation.* Based on the circumstances of each hearing, the ALJ may direct the use of, or any party may use, an electronic presentation during the hearing. If the ALJ requires an electronic presentation during the hearing, each party will be responsible for their own presentation and related costs, unless the parties agree to another manner in which to allocate presentation responsibilities and costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  6,005
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             115
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,464
<PP&E>                                 47,550
<DEPRECIATION>                         13,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         72,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     587
<BONDS>                                21,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             49,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           72,304
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        4,416
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (584)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (4.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (4.30)
        

</TABLE>
1

Nemecek, Monica (FAA)

From: Nemecek, Monica (FAA)

Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 8:12 AM

To: 'William E. Taylor'; Michalik, Gregory (FAA); Timothy.Smythe@faa.gov; Malekpour, 

Shawn (FAA); Hanley, Brian (FAA)

Cc: Tanya Tuinstra; Tracy Biegler; Fred Begy (fbegy@fredbegylaw.com); 9-AGL-CHI-ACOCOS (FAA)

Subject: RE: EAD Revision

Hi Bill, 

The numbers were added in to the preamble after the worksheet left the ACO, but were reviewed by 

the ACO before publication. My understanding is that the numbers came from the population that 

was included in the Weibull analysis. But you are correct in pointing out that there were additional 

inspections that were not included there. I can assure you there was no intent to exaggerate the 

percentage. We will talk internally to see what we can do to address your concern. 

Best Regards, 

Monica L. Nemecek 

Continued Operational Safety 

Program Manager 

Chicago Aircraft Certification Office 

847-294-7618 

From: William E. Taylor [mailto:wtaylor@enstromhelicopter.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 4:08 PM 

To: Nemecek, Monica (FAA); Michalik, Gregory (FAA); Timothy.Smythe@faa.gov; Malekpour, Shawn (FAA) 

Cc: Tanya Tuinstra; Tracy Biegler; Fred Begy (fbegy@fredbegylaw.com) 

Subject: EAD Revision 

Monica:

I just read through the EAD revision, and I’m a little disappointed. The preamble to the EAD states “Since we issued EAD

2015‐04‐51, inspection reports received by the FAA indicate approximately 20% of the spindles have evidence of

cracks.” In our conversations with Greg, we understood that Enstrom and the FAA would share data. Based on the data

that we provided to the FAA, and which Greg said included all the spindle data he had, we received notification of 11

cracked spindles out 121 inspections. By my calculations, that is 7.4%. If you include the spindles from Colorado

(inspected before the release of the EAD), the numbers become 14 cracked spindles out of 124 inspections, or 11.2%.

Neither 7.4% nor 11.2% is what I would call “approximately 20%.” We have operators who are concerned by the very

fact the FAA issued an EAD. I do not see what exaggerating the percentage of cracked spindles does to further the cause

of aviation safety.

I’m wondering what happened when Enstrom provided all our data in good faith, and then the AD comes out with this

type of inaccuracy. Would you please explain why the FAA chose to take this approach?

Bill
2

William E. Taylor 

Senior Technical Fellow 

Enstrom Helicopter Corporation 

906-863-1200 Ext. 115 

920-371-1060 (Cell) 

Fax: 906-863-6821 

The information contained in this transmission is proprietary and is intended solely for the use of the individuals or organizations to whom it was addressed. If you 

have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete it.
EXHIBIT 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                         State         Date
      Corporation Name                       % Owned    of Inc.    Incorporated
      ________________                       _______    _______    ____________

DHB Armor Group, Inc.                         100 %       FL         02/04/03
DHB Sports Group Inc.                         100 %       DE         05/02/97
NDL Products Inc.                             100 %       FL         12/16/94
Point Blank Body Armor Inc.                   100 %       DE         01/27/95
Protective Apparel Corporation of America     100 %       NY         01/09/75
Point Blank International S.A.                100 %     Belgium      _______
# C_2021518EN.01000101.xml

| 22.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 518/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 518/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2021

(2021/C 518/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1295 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0417 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1488 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,240 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 368,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6375 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 14,7132 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5840 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4599 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8111 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6726 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5414 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 345,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9025 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1965 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 135,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7540 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,389 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,5985 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,019 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4573 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4677 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3648 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1295

JPY

Japanese yen

128,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85280

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0417

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1488

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,240

HUF

Hungarian forint

368,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6375

RON

Romanian leu

4,9500

TRY

Turkish lira

14,7132

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5840

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4599

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8111

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6726

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5414

KRW

South Korean won

1 345,39

ZAR

South African rand

17,9025

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1965

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 135,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7540

PHP

Philippine peso

56,389

RUB

Russian rouble

83,5985

THB

Thai baht

38,019

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4573

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4677

INR

Indian rupee

85,3648

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---