alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016003EN.01000601.xml

| 7.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 15 July 2015

in Case E-2/15

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 on screening of passengers by ETD and HHMD equipment)

(2016/C 3/07)

In Case E-2/15, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt the measures necessary to make as such part of its internal legal order the Act referred to at point 66he, twelfth indent, of Annex XIII to the Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 104/2013 of 4 February 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 as regards the screening of passengers and persons other than passengers by Explosive Trace Detection (‘ETD’) equipment in combination with Hand Held Metal Detection (‘HHMD’) equipment), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto and the sectoral adaptations in Annex XIII, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 15 July 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt the measures necessary to make part of its internal legal order the Act referred to at point 66he, twelfth indent, of Annex XIII to the Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 104/2013 of 4 February 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 as regards the screening of passengers and persons other than passengers by Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) equipment in combination with Hand Held Metal Detection (HHMD) equipment), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto and the sectoral adaptations in Annex XIII. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt the measures necessary to make part of its internal legal order the Act referred to at point 66he, twelfth indent, of Annex XIII to the Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 104/2013 of 4 February 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 as regards the screening of passengers and persons other than passengers by Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) equipment in combination with Hand Held Metal Detection (HHMD) equipment), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto and the sectoral adaptations in Annex XIII.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
§ 250.181 Reports of change in control of bank management incident to a merger. ( a ) A State member bank has inquired whether Pub. L. 88-593 (78 Stat. 940) requires reports of change in control of bank management in situations where the change occurs as an incident in a merger.
( b ) Under the Bank Merger Act of 1960 (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), no bank with Federal deposit insurance may merge or consolidate with, or acquire the assets of, or assume the liability to pay deposits in, any other insured bank without prior approval of the appropriate Federal bank supervisory agency. Where the bank resulting from any such transaction is a State member bank, the Board of Governors is the agency that must pass on the transaction. In the course of consideration of such an application, the Board would, of necessity, acquire knowledge of any change in control of management that might result. Information concerning any such change in control of management is supplied with each merger application and, in the circumstances, it is the view of the Board that the receipt of such information in connection with a merger application constitutes compliance with Pub. L. 88-593. However, once a merger has been approved and completely effectuated, the resulting bank would thereafter be subject to the reporting requirements of Pub. L. 88-593.
(12 U.S.C. 1817)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****FAA costaccounting system FY ... AFSS service delivery point report for the fiscal yearending...**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.88/4:
ItemNumber:0431-C-74(online)
CGPsystem Number:000602837
 
2001
2002
2003
 **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          97,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,480,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                      3,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,615,968
<PP&E>                                         776,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                 658,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,771,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,885,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,155
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,113,796)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,771,984
<SALES>                                        143,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,756
<CGS>                                          166,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (22)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on  Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended September 30 , 2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Chief   Executive  Officer of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer , Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 15, 2006
§ 150.470 Who directs the conduct of the audit? Your fiduciary audit committee directs the conduct of the audit. Your fiduciary audit committee may consist of a committee of your directors or an audit committee of an affiliate. There are two restrictions on who may serve on the committee: ( a ) Your officers and officers of an affiliate who participate significantly in administering your fiduciary activities may not serve on the audit committee.
( b ) A majority of the members of the audit committee may not serve on any committee to which the board of directors has delegated power to manage and control your fiduciary activities.
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Blue Cube Spinco Inc.



 Exhibit 4.1 
 



 
 NUMBER 
0 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SHARES 
Blue Cube Spinco Inc. 
TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE 
100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $ .001 EACH 
COMMON STOCK 
See Reverse for Certain Definitions 
SPECIMEN 
This is to Certify that is the owner of fully paid and non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. 
Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly
authorized officers. 
Dated 
Secretary President 
© 1999 CORPEX BANKNOTE CO., BAY SHORE N.Y.
§ 240.1 Authority, purpose and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) under the authority of section 2(c)(2)(E) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)), sections 9 and 11 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 321-338 and 248), section 5(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1844(b)), sections 9 and 13a of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3106a and 3108), and sections 3(q) and 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(q) and 1818).
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes rules applicable to retail foreign exchange transactions engaged in by banking institutions on or after May 13, 2013.
( c ) *Scope.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, this part applies to banking institutions, as defined in section 240.2(b) of this part, and any branches or offices of those institutions wherever located. This part applies to subsidiaries of banking institutions organized under the laws of the United States or any U.S. state that are not subject to the jurisdiction of another federal regulatory agency authorized to prescribe rules or regulations under section 2(c)(2)(E) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. (2)(c)(2)(E)).
( d ) *International applicability.* Sections 240.3 and 240.5 through 240.16 do not apply to retail foreign exchange transactions between a foreign branch or office of a banking institution and a non-U.S. customer. With respect to those transactions, the foreign branch or office remains subject to any disclosure, recordkeeping, capital, margin, reporting, business conduct, documentation, and other requirements of applicable foreign law.
427 A.2d 247

#### Yandrich, Admn. Est. of Yandrich, dec’d., Appellant v. Radic v. Yandrich etc.

Argued March 5, 1980.

Richard C. Angino, for appellant;

Richard H. Wix, for appellee.

Before CERCONE, P.J., and WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed based on the lower court opinion of Honorable John C. Dowling.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,610,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              125,955,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,577,000
<INVENTORY>                                 82,644,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           219,241,000
<PP&E>                                     202,367,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,980,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             724,780,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      110,697,000
<BONDS>                                    180,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 29,485,000
<COMMON>                                       396,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 239,499,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               724,780,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           432,207,000
<CGS>                                      402,571,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              402,571,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,926,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,591,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,496,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,783,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,713,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  74,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (862,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,357,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 263.72 Request for informal hearing.

An institution-affiliated party who is suspended or removed from office or prohibited from participation in the institution's affairs may request an informal hearing within 30 days of service of the notice or order. The request shall be filed in writing with the Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. The request shall state with particularity the relief desired and the grounds therefor and shall include, when available, supporting evidence in the form of affidavits. If the institution-affiliated party desires to present oral testimony or witnesses at the hearing, the institution-affiliated party must include a request to do so with the request for informal hearing. The request to present oral testimony or witnesses shall specify the names of the witnesses and the general nature of their expected testimony.
CONSULTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT



This  Consulting  and  Services Agreement (this  "Agreement")  is
entered  into  as  of  June  2,2000 between  eConnect,  a  Nevada
corporation, (the "Company" and Rogel Patawaran, "Consultant").



In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the parties hereby agree as follows:



1.  Term. The Company hereby retains Consultant as an independent
consultant,  with the duties particularized in Section  2  hereof
and  subject to other terms and conditions particularized herein,
and  Consultant hereby agrees to act as such for the Company, for
the  period  commencing on the date hereof and  expiring  on  the
completion by Consultant of the Services (as defined in Section 2
hereof).



2.   Duties.  During  the  Term,  Consultant  shall  devote   his
reasonable  best efforts to Performing the Services  (as  defined
hereinbelow)  on behalf of the Company, at such reasonable  times
and  places  as determined by Consultant. The Company understands
and  hereby  expressly  acknowledges  that  the  Services  to  be
provided  to  the  Company by Consultant pursuant  to  the  terms
hereof  shall be on a non- exclusive basis only. As  employed  in
this  Agreement, Services shall mean: The design and  development
of  the  Patented  TV  Pin  Pad remote which  the  Company  shall
distribute as a PERFECT device for satellite and cable  encrypted
pay per view.



3.  Consideration to Consultant for Services. In consideration of
the Services to be rendered by Consultant to the Company pursuant
to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company shall  pay  Consultant  the
issuance of 980,000 S-8 consultant free trading shares,  in  lieu
of cash payment.



4.  Representation of Authority. The Company and Consultant  each
hereby  represents and warrants that has the necessary power  and
authority  to enter into and deliver this Agreement,  to  perform
its  obligations  hereunder  and to  consummate  the  transaction
contemplated  hereby,  and  that  such  actions  have  been  duly
authorized  by, respectively, the Company and the  Consultant  in
accordance with applicable law.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed
this  Consulting  and Services Agreement as  of  the  date  first
written above.



THE COMPANY"



eConnect



Name: /s/ Thomas S. Hughes

Title: Chairman & CEO



"CONSULTANT"



By: /s/ Rogel Patawaran

Name: Rogel Patawaran

Address: 3450 Wilshire Blvd.
     LA, CA 90276
# C_2009294EN.01001701.xml

| 3.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/17

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

2009/C 294/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 23 July 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 66250 |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Region | : | Reykjanesbær and Garður municipalities in Suðurnes/Reykjanes area, south-west Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Norðurál Helguvík ehf |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) and (3) of the EEA Agreement |
| Objective | : | Regional development |
| Form of aid | : | Tax and fee concessions |
| Budget | : | EUR 69 747 000 |
| Intensity | : | 5,59 % |
| Duration | : | 20 years |
| Economic sectors | : | Aluminium production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| Arnarhváli |
| 150 Reykjavík |
| Reykjanesbær Town |
| Tjarnargötu 12 |
| 230 Keflavík and Garður Municipality |
| Melabraut 3 |
| 250 Garður |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

23 July 2009

Case number

:

66250

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Region

:

Reykjanesbær and Garður municipalities in Suðurnes/Reykjanes area, south-west Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Norðurál Helguvík ehf

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) and (3) of the EEA Agreement

Objective

:

Regional development

Form of aid

:

Tax and fee concessions

Budget

:

EUR 69 747 000

Intensity

:

5,59 %

Duration

:

20 years

Economic sectors

:

Aluminium production

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

Arnarhváli

150 Reykjavík

Reykjanesbær Town

Tjarnargötu 12

230 Keflavík and Garður Municipality

Melabraut 3

250 Garður

ICELAND

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3013

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a public hearing 

before establishing or relocating any Quick Response Team that works 

with State and local law enforcement officers to take illegal and criminal 

aliens into custody and remove them from the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. WAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct 

a public hearing before establishing or relocating any 

Quick Response Team that works with State and local 

law enforcement officers to take illegal and criminal 

aliens into custody and remove them from the United 

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HEARING REQUIRED BEFORE QUICK RE4 SPONSE TEAM ESTABLISHED. 

5 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a 

6 public hearing within the affected community before estab-
2

•HR 3013 IH 

1 lishing or relocating any Quick Response Team whose 

2 duty it is to coordinate with State and local law enforce3 ment officers to increase efforts to take into custody and 

4 remove from the United States illegal and criminal aliens 

5 apprehended by such officers.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

        EX-4.12



                                Amendments to the
                  Washington Mutual Employee Service Award Plan


        The Washington Mutual Employee Service Award Plan is amended as of July
20, 1999 as follows:

1.      The final sentence of the existing section entitled "Eligibility" shall
        be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

              "However, employees of Mutual Travel, Inc. are not eligible to
                receive awards, and individuals who are subject to liability
                under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                ("Section 16 Employees") are only eligible to receive cash
                awards."

2.      A new paragraph shall be added after the second paragraph of the
        existing Section entitled "Terms of Awards," to read as set forth below:

              "The foregoing provisions of this Terms of Awards section of the
                Plan notwithstanding, Section 16 Employees shall receive the
                value of their award in cash, based on the Table set forth
                above, rather than in shares of Common Stock."
§ 263.111 Action by the Board. ( a ) *Exceptions to recommended decision.* Within 20 days after service of the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order, the applicant or counsel for the Board may file written exceptions thereto. A supporting brief may also be filed.
( b ) *Decision by the Board.* The Board shall render its decision within 90 days after it has notified the parties that the matter has been received for decision. The Board shall serve copies of the decision and order of the Board upon the parties. Judicial review of the decision and order may be obtained as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).