alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Open-File Report 98-137

Geology of the onshore part of San Mateo County, California:  A digital database

By: E.E. Brabb, R.W. Graymer, and D.L. Jones Click here to view larger image - 43 KB



---

View the database explanation pamphlet as an unformatted,text-only file: smdb.txt (27 kB)

View the database explanation pamphlet as a formatted PDF file: smdb.pdf (35 kB)

Download the database explanation pamphlet as a formattedPostScript plot file: smdb.ps (192 kB)

View the geologic explanation pamphlet as an unformatted, text-only file: smgeo.txt (53 kB)

View the geologic explanation pamphlet as a formatted PDF file: smgeo.pdf (59 kB)

Download the geologic explanation pamphlet as a formattedPostScript plot file: smgeo.ps (104 kB)

View the geologic map sheet as a JPEG file (base-map removed): smmap.jpg (43 kB)

View the geologic map sheet as a PDF file: smmap.pdf (5.5 MB)

View the geologic explanation sheet as a PDF file: smexpl.pdf (1.2 MB)

Download the database package in ARC/INFO 7.x uncompressed export formatalong with supporting materials in a compressed UNIX tar file(see the database explanation pamphlet for details): sm_g1.tar.gz (5.4 MB compressed download file, 27.6 MB when uncompressed)

Download three Postscript plottable files containing images of the geologic maps and base maps at a scale of 1:62,500, explanation sheet,and explanatory text in a compressed UNIX tar file (see the databaseexplanation pamphlet for details): smps.tar.gz (5.2 MB compressed download file, 23.4 MB when uncompressed)



---

| | For more information on the geologyof the San Francisco Bay region:Visit the sfgeo website
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
# C_2021396EN.01000601.xml

| 30.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 396/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.6.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87016 |
| Decision No | 170/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 2nd amendment to the digital gift voucher scheme |
| Legal basis | Legislative act Amending Act No 54/2020 on Digital Vouchers (lög um ferðagjöf) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To increase domestic demand for tourist services, thereby benefitting the tourist service sector |
| Form of aid | Grants (indirect aid) |
| Budget | ISK 1,4 billion |
| Duration | 1.6.2021 to 30.9.2021 |
| Economic sectors | Tourism |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs |
| Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.6.2021

Case No

87016

Decision No

170/21/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 2nd amendment to the digital gift voucher scheme

Legal basis

Legislative act Amending Act No 54/2020 on Digital Vouchers (lög um ferðagjöf)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To increase domestic demand for tourist services, thereby benefitting the tourist service sector

Form of aid

Grants (indirect aid)

Budget

ISK 1,4 billion

Duration

1.6.2021 to 30.9.2021

Economic sectors

Tourism

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
```

[House Report 106-953]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-953

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY 
  H.R. 4461, THE AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG 
  ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 10, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 617]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 617, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4461, the Agriculture, 
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.

                            committee votes

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 119

    Date: October 10, 2000.
    Measure: Conference Report to accompany H.R. 4461, the 
Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, 
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001.
    Motion by: Mr. Frost.
    Summary of motion: To amend the rule to provide that when 
the House adopts the rule it will be deemed to have adopted a 
concurrent resolution directing the Clerk to make certain 
corrections in the conference report. It further provides that 
a message must be received from the Senate informing the House 
that it has adopted the concurrent resolution before the 
conference report may be considered by the House. The amendment 
provides that all points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The concurrent 
resolution would direct the Clerk to make changes in the 
conference report to allow for stronger, pro-consumer and loop-
hole free language on the reimportation of prescription drugs.
    Results: Defeated 3 to 7.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Nay; Linder--Nay; Pryce--Nay; Diaz-
Balart--Nay; Hastings--Nay; Myrick--Nay; Sessions--Nay; 
Moakley--Yea; Frost--Yea; Hall--Yea.

                                  

```
**Exhibit31.3**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Frederick J. Rowan, II, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of The William Carter Company;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 |                        |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                    | /s/ FREDERICK J.  ROWAN, II |
|                    | Frederick J.  Rowan, II     |
| * *                | *Chief Executive Officer*   |

 

29

----
**Exhibit31.4**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Michael D. Casey certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of The William Carter Company;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 |                       |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    |                       |
|                    | /s/ MICHAEL D.  CASEY      |
|                    | Michael D. Casey           |
| * *                | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

30

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40814

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLAY ROBERTSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-154-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clay Robertson appeals his sentence for conspiracy to

possess marijuana with intent to distribute. Robertson argues

that the district court erred in imposing a sentence adjustment

for obstruction of justice pursuant to United States Sentencing

Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 3C1.1. This argument was not

raised before the district court. Having reviewed the record and

the briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM. Based on the district

court’s adoption of the Presentence Investigation Report, we find

that no plain error was committed. See United States v. Vital, 
No. 97-40814

-2-

68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Lopez, 923

F.2d 47, 49 (5th Cir. 1991). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 27.4 Inquiry/Application Log. ( a ) The Comptroller, among other things, may require a bank to maintain a Fair Housing Inquiry/Application Log (“Log”), based upon, but not limited to, one or more of the following causes: ( 1 ) There is reason(s) to believe that the bank may be prescreening or otherwise engaging in discriminatory practices on a prohibited basis.
( 2 ) Complaints filed with the Comptroller or letters in the Community Reinvestment Act file are found to be substantive in nature, indicating that the bank's home lending practices are, or may be, discriminatory.
( 3 ) Analysis of the data compiled by the bank under the provisions of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (12 U.S.C. 2801 *et seq.* and Regulation C of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 CFR part 203) indicates a pattern of significant variation in the number of home loans between census tracts with similar incomes and home ownership levels, differentiated only by race or national origin (i.e., possible racial redlining).
( b ) The Comptroller, when requiring the maintenance of a Log, will specify in writing: ( 1 ) The location(s) where the information shall be obtained;
( 2 ) The length of time it shall be maintained;
( 3 ) The frequency with which it shall be submitted to the Comptroller; and
( 4 ) The reason(s) for imposing this requirement.
( c ) A bank which has been directed by the Comptroller to maintain a Log shall obtain and note all of the following information regarding each inquiry or application for the extension of a home loan and each inquiry or application for a government insured home loan (not otherwise included in this part): ( 1 ) Date of application or inquiry.
( 2 ) Type of loan using the categories: purchase, construction-permanent; refinance; and government insured by type of insurance, *i.e.,* FHA, VA, and FmHA (if applicable).
( 3 ) Indication of whether the entry refers to an application or an inquiry.
( 4 ) Case identification (either a unique number which permits the application file to be located, or the name(s) and address(es) of the applicant(s)).
( 5 ) Race/national origin of the inquirer(s) or applicant(s) using the categories: American Indian or Alaskan Native; Asian or Pacific Islander; Black, not of Hispanic origin; White, not of Hispanic origin; Hispanic; Other. In the case of inquiries, this item shall be noted on the basis of visual observation or surname(s) only. In the case of applications, the information shall be obtained pursuant to § 27.3(b)(2).
( 6 ) *Location.* Complete street address, city, county, state and zip code of the property which will secure the extension of credit. The census tract shall also be recorded when the property is located in an SMSA in which the bank has a home office or branch office.
( d ) The information required under § 27.4(c), of this part, shall be recorded and maintained on the form set forth in appendix III. Additional information may be recorded and maintained at the bank's discretion.
[44 FR 63089, Nov. 2, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 26415, May 20, 1994]
EXHIBIT
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrow Resources
      Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on June 30,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Peter
              FrugonePeter
              Frugone




Date: August
      14, 2006.
From: Figler, Lyndsey M. [LFigler@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:29 AM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Cc: Burrows, Byron T.; Lukcic, David M.

Subject: Reference Test Method

Hi Art, 

I confirmed that the reference test method for CO2 is method 3A. I am working on getting the 

other item.

Thank you,

Lyndsey Figler (Baldyga)

Environmental Health & Safety

Air Programs: Engineer I

Phone: 813-228-4740

Ext. 34740

Mobile: 813-309-0376

LFigler@tecoenergy.com

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have 

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or disclose it to 

anyone else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses 

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
# C_2023049EN.01000501.xml

| 9.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/5

---

Dedicated Calls for proposals in 2023 under the Work Programme 2023 of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Programme (2021-2027)

(2023/C 49/04)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of two dedicated calls for proposals (i.e. one Big Tickets call in coal and one Big Tickets call in steel) and related activities in 2023 under the Work Programme 2023 of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel programme (2021-2027).

The Commission has adopted the RFCS Work Programme 2023 by Decision C(2023) 633 of 27 January 2023.

Proposals are invited for these calls. The RFCS Work Programme 2023, including objectives, deadlines and budgets, is available through the Funding & Tender opportunities website along with information on the modalities of the calls and related activities and the information for applicants on how to submit proposals:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly consolidated financial statements of UNUM Corporation and 
subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such contained 
in UNUM Corporation's SEC Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         7,576,300
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      34,800
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,128,400
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  221,700
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               9,249,000
<CASH>                                          52,800
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,640,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,163,700  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,310,500
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              8,666,800
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          923,700
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                717,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,564,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,310,500
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,880,600
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            328,500
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,400
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  66,600
<BENEFITS>                                   1,389,100
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (132,600)<F1>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                275,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    83,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            192,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>This item contains the amounts of deferred and amortized policy acquisition
costs for the period presented.
</FN>
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>