alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NORMA FAYE CANIPE, a/k/a Norma Pritt, a/k/a

Lora Pritt, a/k/a Norma Brown, a/k/a Laura

Pritt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Charles H. Haden II,

District Judge. (CR-02-130)

Submitted: October 24, 2003 Decided: February 10, 2004

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David O. Schles, STOWERS & ASSOCIATES, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Susan M.

Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Norma Faye Canipe appeals her 175-month sentence pursuant

to her guilty plea to aiding and abetting wire fraud, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1343 (2000), and being a felon in possession of

a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). On

appeal, Canipe asserts the district court erred in denying her a

downward adjustment to her offense level for acceptance of

responsibility. A district court’s determination of whether a

defendant is entitled to an adjustment for acceptance of

responsibility is factual, and is reviewed for clear error. United

States v. Ruhe, 191 F.3d 376, 388 (4th Cir. 1999). Canipe’s claim

is meritless. Canipe’s false statements to investigating

authorities preclude a finding that the district court erred by

failing to grant Canipe an adjustment for acceptance of

responsibility. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1(a)-(b)

(2002). 

Accordingly, we affirm Canipe’s conviction and sentence. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022153EN.01001401.xml

| 7.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 December 2021

in Case E-2/21

Norep AS v Haugen Gruppen AS

(Self-employed commercial agents – Directive 86/653/EEC – Article 1(2) – Definition of ‘commercial agent’ – Negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal)

(2022/C 153/08)

In Case E-2/21, Norep As v Haugen Gruppen AS – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett) concerning the interpretation of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Per Christiansen and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 14 December 2021, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, and in particular the term ‘negotiate’, should be interpreted as not necessarily presupposing the agent’s direct involvement with the placing of orders by customers with the principal, or excluding a scenario in which orders go directly from customers to the principal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, and in particular the term ‘negotiate’, should be interpreted as not necessarily presupposing the agent’s direct involvement with the placing of orders by customers with the principal, or excluding a scenario in which orders go directly from customers to the principal.

| 2. | Sales-related activity should be deemed to be negotiation for the purposes of Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC if it is specifically undertaken with a view to achieving the conclusion of contracts of sale or purchase of goods by the principal, and if the agent acts as an intermediary between the principal and his customers. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sales-related activity should be deemed to be negotiation for the purposes of Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC if it is specifically undertaken with a view to achieving the conclusion of contracts of sale or purchase of goods by the principal, and if the agent acts as an intermediary between the principal and his customers.

---
HomeResponding to Global Health Threats

# 									Responding to Global Health Threats							

Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy

Halting infectious disease outbreaks at their points of origin is one of the best and most economical ways of saving lives and protecting U.S. citizens. The Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD) monitors potential public health events of international concern and serves as policy advisor and incident manager for the State Department’s response to infectious disease outbreaks as part of a whole-of-government effort.

Working with U.S. embassies, GHSD mobilizes resources – expert, technical, financial, and in-kind – across the U.S. government and international public and private sector partners to support host government-led preparedness and response efforts. GHSD engages foreign governments to reduce barriers to effective outbreak responses, make science-based decisions that prevent outbreak spread, and mitigate unproductive response measures that interfere with travel and trade. GHSD engages the World Health Organization and international partners to improve governance, coordination, and accountability in the response to health emergencies.

Effective outbreak response requires preparedness efforts that incorporate lessons learned from past outbreaks. GHSD collaborates with other U.S. government partners to train U.S. and foreign officials and conduct outbreak response exercises. This includes developing protocols, agreements, and standard operating procedures to facilitate international deployment of U.S. government resources and personnel in future outbreaks. Preparedness is critical for responding to outbreaks quickly and stopping them at their source – before they become pandemics.

The State Department’s work responding to infectious disease outbreaks is highlighted by recent responses to COVID-19, mpox, Ebola, and Marburg. As long as infectious diseases such as these are spreading anywhere, they’re a threat to people everywhere. That’s why the United States catalyzed political momentum and enhanced coordination to close gaps in the global COVID-19 response through accelerating access to COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. The United States exercised diplomatic leadership in the international response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its secondary impacts while strengthening global biosecurity infrastructure to address COVID-19 and future health-related threats.

COVID-19 Response and Recovery: https://www.state.gov/covid-19-recovery/

COVID-19 Vaccine Donations:  https://www.state.gov/covid-19-recovery/vaccine-deliveries/

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2974 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2974

  To prohibit the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland 
  Security from purchasing equipment containing electronic components 
            that are not manufactured in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland 
  Security from purchasing equipment containing electronic components 
            that are not manufactured in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep America Secure Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST PURCHASING EQUIPMENT CONTAINING ELECTRONIC 
              COMPONENTS NOT MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 
Homeland Security may not purchase any equipment that contains 
electronic components that are not manufactured in the United States.
    (b) Exception.--The Secretary concerned may waive the application 
of subsection (a) with respect to a purchase if the Secretary 
determines that application of such subsection to such purchase would 
be inconsistent with the public interest or would result in 
unreasonable costs to the Department of Defense or the Department of 
Homeland Security, as the case may be.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``electronic 
components'' includes, but is not limited to--
            (1) any integrated chip or sensing device;
            (2) communications systems and equipment;
            (3) search, navigation, and guidance systems and equipment; 
        and
            (4) software associated with the items described in 
        paragraphs (1) through (3).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022297EN.01000401.xml

| 4.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/4

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 297/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5 April 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88473 |
| Decision No | 071/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 – Amendment to the travel guarantee fund for package travel traders |
| Legal basis | An amendment to Act No 78/2020 on Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangement |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Interest rate subsidy |
| Budget | ISK 4,5 billion |
| Duration | 2.7.2020 – 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | NACE 79 - Travel agency, tour operator and other reservation service and related activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ferðamálastofa |
| Hafnarstræti 91 |
| 600 Akureyri |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

5 April 2022

Case No

88473

Decision No

071/22/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 – Amendment to the travel guarantee fund for package travel traders

Legal basis

An amendment to Act No 78/2020 on Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangement

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Interest rate subsidy

Budget

ISK 4,5 billion

Duration

2.7.2020 – 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

NACE 79 - Travel agency, tour operator and other reservation service and related activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Ferðamálastofa

Hafnarstræti 91

600 Akureyri

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
#### § 59.10 General requirements for a grant.

For a State to obtain a grant under this part and grant funds, its initial application for the grant must be approved under § 59.20, and the project must be ranked sufficiently high on the priority list for the current fiscal year so that funding is available for the project. It must meet the additional application requirements in § 59.60, and it must meet all other requirements under this part for obtaining a grant and grant funds.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

78) ll-E-38 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:05 AM 

i 

i 

Sheet 78 of 264 

1 
P.2 

A-94-52 

»-E-# 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES 

March 18,1996 

Ms. Joan Tracy 

Company: Venus Gusmer 

Telephone Number: (206) 854-2660 

Contact Summary: 

The conversation regarded costs to convert a Venus Gusmer spray gun to a flow coater. 

According to Ms. Tracy, Venus Gusmer sells a nozzle and a spray tip for $272 to convert a spray 

gun into a flow coater. The same pump used for the spray gun can be used for flow coaters and 

no other parts are necessary for the conversion. 

Ms. Tracy explained that the application rate of a flow coater is between 5 an 7 pounds of 

resin per minute, which is lower than the application rate of a spray gun with an average rate of 8 

pounds per minute.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA CRUZ

- PINEDA; JHONATAN

MARTIN RODRIGUEZ

- CRUZ,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 72375

Agency Nos. A202

- 027

- 802

A202

- 027

- 803

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 17, 2019 **
Pasadena, California

Before: NGUYEN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and VITALIANO, *** District Judge.

Maria Cruz

- Pineda and her minor son

— whose claim is derivative of his

mother’s

— are natives and citizens of El Salvador . They seek review of the Board

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

OCT 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA ) final removal order, dismissing their appeal from

the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying them asylum and withholding of

removal. Cruz did not appeal the IJ’s denial of protection under the Convention

Against Torture to the BIA ; therefore, to the extent Cruz raises it now , t his court

does not have jurisdiction to review the IJ’s denial of relief on this basis

. See 8

U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (this court may review final orders of removal “only if” the

alien has exhausted “all administrative remedies ” ). As the parties are familiar with

the facts, we do not recount them here. We deny the petition.

The BIA properly affirmed the IJ’s denial of relief on adverse credibility

grounds. See Joseph v. Holder , 600 F.3d 1235, 1240 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating the

sta ndard of review). The BIA and IJ cited “specific and cogent reasons” for

finding Cruz not credible. Manes v. Sessions , 875 F.3d 1261, 1263 (9th Cir. 2017)

(per curiam). For example , the BIA and IJ identified “significant inconsistencies

in [Cruz’s] test imony related to the alleged threats made by gang members

, ”

including which gang targeted her family and what they demanded. Substantial

evidence supports the grounds relied on by the BIA to affirm the IJ’s adverse

credibility determination.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
# C_2022202EN.01001701.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/17

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/13)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28 January 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88037 |
| Decision No | 025/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 renewal of and amendments to the scheme compensating for the cancellation of large public events |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary decision authorising the scheme and the prolongation in the revised State budget. In addition to a letter of assignment from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway. |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and co-organisers of large public events face following the COVID-19 outbreak. |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 85 million |
| Intensity | 60 % |
| Duration | Until 30 June 2022 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| P.O. Box 448 Sentrum |
| Akersgata 13 |
| N-0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

28 January 2021

Case No

88037

Decision No

025/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 renewal of and amendments to the scheme compensating for the cancellation of large public events

Legal basis

Parliamentary decision authorising the scheme and the prolongation in the revised State budget. In addition to a letter of assignment from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway.

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and co-organisers of large public events face following the COVID-19 outbreak.

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 85 million

Intensity

60 %

Duration

Until 30 June 2022

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

P.O. Box 448 Sentrum

Akersgata 13

N-0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 29,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Robert J. Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company and John J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of our knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Robert J. Higgins                |   | /s/ John J. Sullivan                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 |   |                                                 |
|                                 |   |                                                 |
| June 8, 2006                    |   | June 8, 2006                                    |

 

----
§ 261b.4 Meetings open to public observation. ( a ) Except as provided in § 261b.5, every portion of every meeting of the agency shall be open to public observation.
( b ) Copies of staff documents considered in connection with agency discussion of agenda items for a meeting that is open to public observation shall be made available for distribution to members of the public attending the meeting, in accordance with the provisions of 12 CFR part 261.
( c ) The agency will maintain a complete electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting or portion of a meeting open to public observation. Cassettes will be available for listening in the Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for $5 per cassette by telephoning or by writing Freedom of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
( d ) The agency will maintain mailing lists of names and addresses of all persons who wish to receive copies of agency announcements of meetings open to public observation. Requests for announcements may be made by telephoning or by writing Freedom of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
[44 FR 11750, Mar. 2, 1979]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2446]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / 
Notices

[[Page 6264]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177c7376677f797e6457787a753972786739707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b000f0a1b030502182b040609450e041b450c041d">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-395-3087. Copies of submission may 
be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-NEW.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: Offeror Information for Personal Services Contracts.
    Type of Submission: New Information Collection.
    Purpose: The purpose of this information collection is to obtain 
information from the offeror for personal service contract positions. 
This information will include administrative information, work 
experience, education and qualifications in addition to offerors 
certification.
    Annual Reporting Burden:

     Respondents: 5,000.
     Total annual responses: 10,000.
     Total annual hours requested: 5,000 hours.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Joanne Paskar,
Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. E9-2446 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>