alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016457EN.01001202.xml

| 8.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/12

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Obergericht, Liechtenstein, dated 25 September 2015, in the Case of Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung

(Case E-24/15)

(2016/C 457/10)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 25 September 2015 from Fürstliches Obergericht, Liechtenstein (Princely Court of Appeal, Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 1 October 2015, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung, on the following questions:

| 1. | Does the fact that under the second sentence of Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 the debtor institution shall be bound by the findings of the institution of the place of stay or residence preclude the debtor institution from challenging those findings – and thus the information stated in the detailed medical report provided in form E 213 – in its procedure? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the fact that under the second sentence of Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 the debtor institution shall be bound by the findings of the institution of the place of stay or residence preclude the debtor institution from challenging those findings – and thus the information stated in the detailed medical report provided in form E 213 – in its procedure?

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: Does that binding effect also apply in court proceedings which, under national procedural rules, follow on from the proceedings before a debtor institution? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: Does that binding effect also apply in court proceedings which, under national procedural rules, follow on from the proceedings before a debtor institution?

---
# C_2021058EN.01005201.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/52

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 58/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12 November 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85836 |
| Decision No | 133/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | 4th amendment to COVID-19 Guarantee scheme |
| Legal basis | Forskrift om endring i forskrift 27. mars 2020 nr. 490 til lov om statlig garantiordning for lån til små og mellomstore bedrifter, FOR-2020-03-27-490 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended) |
| Duration | 26 March 2020 - 30 June 2021 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency |
| Pb 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

12 November 2020

Case No

85836

Decision No

133/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

4th amendment to COVID-19 Guarantee scheme

Legal basis

Forskrift om endring i forskrift 27. mars 2020 nr. 490 til lov om statlig garantiordning for lån til små og mellomstore bedrifter, FOR-2020-03-27-490

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

NOK 50 billion (for the scheme as amended)

Duration

26 March 2020 - 30 June 2021

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK, The Norwegian Export Credit Guarantee Agency

Pb 1763 Vika

N-0122 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
#### § 222.2 Examples.

The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part. Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issue that may arise in this part.

[70 FR 70678, Nov. 22, 2005]
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2016

- 0457 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 084

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 25 .0 $ 2,125.0

0 $ 2,125.00 

### 1 5 $ 31,875.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of produc ts in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 31,875



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0. 00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act :

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Exhibit 12.2

I, Vittorio Notarpietro, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2015



/s/ Vittorio NotarpietroName:

Vittorio NotarpietroTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,872
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,354
<PP&E>                                         433,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                     324,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,233
<SALES>                                        590,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               590,809
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  511,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,738
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55


</TABLE>
# C_2020243EN.01001101.xml

| 23.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/11

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 243/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 17 April 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85047 |
| Decision No | 039/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Whole territory of Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Grant scheme for undertakings suffering a substantial loss of turnover due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Legal basis | Act on a temporary grant scheme for undertakings suffering a substantial loss of turnover |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensate for damages to undertakings caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to secure employment and ensure a faster recovery of the economy after the crisis |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | Estimated NOK 50 billion |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | The scheme applies to loss suffered from 1 March 2020 until 31 May 2020 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors except for companies engaged in petroleum extraction and production, as well as production, transmission, distribution and trade of power and financial institutions, private kindergartens and airlines |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Tax Administration |
| Postboks 9200, Grønland |
| 0134 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

17 April 2020

Case No

85047

Decision No

039/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Whole territory of Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Grant scheme for undertakings suffering a substantial loss of turnover due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Legal basis

Act on a temporary grant scheme for undertakings suffering a substantial loss of turnover

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensate for damages to undertakings caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to secure employment and ensure a faster recovery of the economy after the crisis

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

Estimated NOK 50 billion

Intensity

100 %

Duration

The scheme applies to loss suffered from 1 March 2020 until 31 May 2020

Economic sectors

All sectors except for companies engaged in petroleum extraction and production, as well as production, transmission, distribution and trade of power and financial institutions, private kindergartens and airlines

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Tax Administration

Postboks 9200, Grønland

0134 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2021113EN.01001101.xml

| 31.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 10 December 2020

in Case E-13/19

Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf.

(Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public service contract – Article 37 EEA – Notion of ‘services’ – Upper secondary education)

(2021/C 113/06)

In Case E-13/19, Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf. – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Public Procurement Complaints Committee (Kærunefnd útboðsmála) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, and in particular point (9) of Article 2(1) and Article 74 thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur), and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 10 December 2020, the operative part of which is as follows:

Contracts with characteristics such as those described in the request, which do not have as their object the provision of services within the meaning of Directive 2014/24/EU, do not constitute public service contracts within the meaning of point (9) of Article 2(1) of that directive.

---
# C_2004319EN.01006501.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/65

---

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION

of 9 September 2004

approving the scheme submitted by Norway for the withdrawal of all fish in Norwegian farms infected with infectious salmon anaemia (ISA)

(2004/C 319/10)

THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement), in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,

Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, in particular Article 5(2)(d) and Protocol 1 thereof,

Having regard to the Act referred to at Point 3.1.7 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, Council Directive 93/53/EEC of 24 June 1993 introducing minimum Community measures for the control of certain fish diseases, as amended, as adapted by way of Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, in particular the first indent of Article 6(a) of that Act,

Having regard to the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 196/04/COL of 14 July 2004 empowering the Member with special responsibility for the free movement of goods to take certain decisions and measures, and in particular Point 1 thereof,

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| 1. | The scheme submitted by Norway for the withdrawal of all fish in Norwegian farms infected with infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) is hereby approved. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The scheme submitted by Norway for the withdrawal of all fish in Norwegian farms infected with infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) is hereby approved.

| 2. | This Decision shall enter into force on 15 September 2004. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 September 2004.

| 3. | This Decision is addressed to Norway. |
| --- | --- |

3.

This Decision is addressed to Norway.

| 4. | This Decision shall be authentic in the English language. |
| --- | --- |

4.

This Decision shall be authentic in the English language.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2004.

For the EFTA Surveillance Authority

Bernd HAMMERMANN

College Member

Niels FENGER

Director

---
EXHIBIT 99.1
             TO CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. REPORT ON FORM 10Q
                                AUGUST 31, 2002
                CERTIFICATION BY KEVIN J. MCANDREW PURSUANT TO
            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canterbury
Consulting Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 31,
2002 (the "Periodic Report") accompanying this certification fully complies
with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in
the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. The foregoing certification
is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other
purpose.

Dated:   October 15, 2002
#### §§ 304.25-304.30 [Reserved]
# C_2015131EN.01000601.xml

| 23.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 24 September 2014

in Case E-3/14

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway

v

(Failure by an EEA State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2009/12/EC on airport charges)

(2015/C 131/06)

In Case E-3/14, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith, of the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 65a of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, namely Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges, as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 24 September 2014, the operative part of which is as follows:

EFTA Surveillance Authority

The Kingdom of Norway

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt all the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 65a of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt all the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 65a of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
EXHIBIT 10.9


                        STOCK OPTION REPLACEMENT PROGRAM


In keeping with the company's philosophy of encouraging stock ownership by
officers and employees, the company offers several programs which allow officers
and key employees to elect to receive stock options in lieu of some or all of
the compensation earned as base salary, sales commissions or under certain
incentive plans. By foregoing such compensation for stock options, the variable
"at risk" component of each officer's or employee's compensation package is
increased, motivating them to perform to enhance shareholder value over the long
term. Under the program, the amount of the stock option grants are determined by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and to date have primarily
been on the basis of $4 in fair market value of stock options for each $1 of
compensation foregone.