Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2009 / Notices 1185 

previously deleted notice (see 73 FR 

66872, November 12, 2008) are not 

covered elsewhere as stated; therefore, 

this notice is being reinstated. 

DATES: This action will be effective on 

February 11, 2009 unless comments are 

received that would result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air 

Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of 

Warfighting Integration and Chief 

Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 1800 

Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20330–1800. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Kenneth Brodie at (703) 696–6488. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of the Air Force systems of 

records notices subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 

amended, have been published in the 

Federal Register and are available from 

the address above. 

The Department of Air Force proposes 

to reinstate a system of records to its 

inventory of record systems subject to 

the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 

as amended. The previous system of 

records notice is being republished in 

its entirety, below. The reinstatement is 

not within the purview of subsection (r) 

of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 

552a), as amended, which requires the 

submission of a new or altered system 

report. 

Dated: January 6, 2009. 

Morgan E. Frazier, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

F031 AFMC A 

SYSTEM NAME: 

AFMC Badge and Vehicle Control 

Records. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Headquarters Air Force Materiel 

Command/SP, Wright-Patterson Air 

Force Base, OH 45433–5320 and Air 

Force Materiel Command bases. Official 

mailing addresses are published as an 

appendix to the Air Force’s compilation 

of systems of records notices. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) 

military and civilian personnel and 

visitors to AFMC headquarters and 

installations. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Badge and vehicle control records to 

include name; home address; home 

telephone; citizenship; grade or rank; 

Social Security Number; clearance level; 

company employed by; military 

address; vehicle state license tag data; 

vehicle make, year, type and color; 

decal number; revoked license status. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

10 U.S.C. 8013, Secretary of the Air 

Force: Powers and duties; delegation by, 

and E.O. 9397 (SSN). 

PURPOSE(S): 

Badge records are used to record 

building/area entry credential 

information, including information on 

the loss or theft of these credentials. 

Motor vehicle records are used to 

identify vehicles parked in an unsafe 

manner, enforce vehicle flow plan, 

notify owners in case of evacuation and 

maintain effective security plan. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

In addition to those disclosures 

generally permitted under 5 U.S.C. 

552a(b) of the Privacy Act, these records 

or information contained therein may 

specifically be disclosed outside the 

DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows: 

The ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ published 

at the beginning of the Air Force’s 

compilation of systems of records 

notices apply to this system. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Maintained in computers and 

computer output products, and in paper 

form. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Records are retrieved by Social 

Security Number. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Records are accessed by persons 

responsible for servicing the record 

system in performance of their official 

duties who are properly screened and 

cleared for need-to-know. Records are 

stored in locked cabinets, locked rooms, 

or buildings with controlled entry. 

Computer records are controlled by 

computer system software. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Badge records are destroyed 

immediately after badge is permanently 

surrendered or confiscated. Vehicle 

records are destroyed immediately after 

termination of registration. Records are 

destroyed by tearing into pieces, 

shredding, pulping, macerating or 

burning. Computer records are 

destroyed by erasing, deleting or 

overwriting. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Headquarters Air Force Materiel 

Command/SP, Wright-Patterson Air 

Force Base, OH 45433–5320, or Chief of 

Security Police at AFMC installations. 

Official mailing addresses are published 

as an appendix to the Air Force’s 

compilation of systems of records 

notices. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information on themselves should 

address inquiries to Headquarters Air 

Force Materiel Command/SP, WrightPatterson Air Force Base, OH 45433– 

5320, or Chief of Security Police at 

AFMC installations. Official mailing 

addresses are published as an appendix 

to the Air Force’s compilation of 

systems of records notices. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to access records 

about themselves contained in this 

system should address requests to 

Headquarters Air Force Materiel 

Command/SP, Wright-Patterson Air 

Force Base, OH 45433–5320, or Chief of 

Security Police at AFMC installations. 

Official mailing addresses are published 

as an appendix to the Air Force’s 

compilation of systems of records 

notices. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

The Air Force rules for accessing 

records, and for contesting contents and 

appealing initial agency determinations 

are published in Air Force Instruction 

37–132; 32 CFR part 806b; or may be 

obtained from the system manager. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Information obtained from 

individuals and from automated system 

interface. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

[FR Doc. E9–242 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Director, Information 

Collection Clearance Division, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1186 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2009 / Notices 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before February 

11, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The IC Clearance 

Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, publishes that notice 

containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or 

reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of 

the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

Dated: January 6, 2009. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Office of Innovation and Improvement 

Type of Review: New Collection. 

Title: School Leadership Program 

(SLP) Annual Performance Report. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 22. 

Burden Hours: 880. 

Abstract: To implement a data 

collection process for a new annual 

reporting for Government Performance 

Results Act (GPRA) purposes for the 

School Leadership Program. These data 

are necessary to assess the performance 

of the SLP grantees in meeting their 

stated goals and objectives and to report 

to ED’s Budget Service. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 3875. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to the Internet address 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202– 

401–0920. Please specify the complete 

title of the information collection when 

making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be electronically mailed to 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 

800–877–8339. 

[FR Doc. E9–244 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Arbitration Panel Decision Under the 

Randolph-Sheppard Act 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

ACTION: Notice of arbitration panel 

decision under the Randolph-Sheppard 

Act. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Education 

(Department) gives notice that on 

August 2, 2008, an arbitration panel 

rendered a decision in the matter of 

Janet Dickey v. Wisconsin Department 

of Workforce Development, Case no. R– 

S/07–10). This panel was convened by 

the Department under 20 U.S.C. 107d– 

1(a), after the Department received a 

complaint filed by the petitioner, Janet 

Dickey. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You 

may obtain a copy of the full text of the 

arbitration panel decision from Suzette 

E. Haynes, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

room 5022, Potomac Center Plaza, 

Washington, DC 20202–2800. 

Telephone: (202) 245–7374. If you use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD), you may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339. 

Individuals with disabilities may 

obtain this document in an accessible 

format (e.g., braille, large print, 

audiotape, or computer diskette) on 

request to the contact person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 

section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard 

Act (the Act), 20 U.S.C. 107d–2(c), the 

Secretary publishes in the Federal 

Register a synopsis of each arbitration 

panel decision affecting the 

administration of vending facilities on 

Federal and other property. 

Background 

Ms. Janet Dickey (Complainant) 

alleged that the Wisconsin Department 

of Workforce Development, Division of 

Vocational Rehabilitation, the state 

licensing agency (SLA) improperly 

administered the Act and the 

implementing regulations in 34 CFR 

part 395 concerning her management of 

an Army cafeteria at Fort McCoy, 

Wisconsin from April 1, 2003 until 

September 30, 2006. Specifically, 

Complainant alleged that the SLA failed 

to provide her with adequate training 

and management support services to 

operate the cafeteria. 

Following the award of the cafeteria 

contract to the SLA, the SLA entered 

into a management service agreement 

with Blackstone Consulting Inc. (BCI). 

BCI is a full service contractor who has 

experience with military dining food 

service contracts and with teaming 

partnership agreements. The 

management service agreement between 

the SLA and BCI provided that the SLA 

and the Complainant would rely on 

BCI’s experience and expertise to 

manage the cafeteria. Also, the 

management service agreement 

provided that BCI would provide 

Complainant with training for the life of 

the contract. 

Thereafter, the Complainant and BCI 

entered into a joint venture agreement, 

which stated that BCI would provide: (a) 

Consulting services to the SLA and the 

Complainant by directly negotiating the 

bidding performance criteria for the 

cafeteria contract at Fort McCoy, (b) 

food service in accordance with the 

cafeteria contract with the Army, and (c) 

on-the-job training for the Complainant 

in coordination with the SLA so that 

Complainant would be prepared to carry 

out the management responsibilities of 

the cafeteria contract. 

By letter dated July 20, 2006, the 

Army’s Fort McCoy Contract Officer 

(Contract Officer) contacted the SLA’s 

Business Enterprise Program (BEP) 

Manager to notify the SLA that there 

had been numerous problems 

concerning the cafeteria contract. The 

Contract Officer alleged problems with 

such things as: opening the cafeteria late 

or not at all, running out of food, and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES