alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                 CEM CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                              1996              1995
                                                                                           ----------        ----------

<S>                                                                                        <C>               <C>       
NET INCOME ....................................................................            $  106,000        $  677,000
                                                                                           ==========        ==========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding .................................             3,540,000         3,617,000

Number of shares purchasable upon exercise of options, reduced by the number of
    shares which could have been purchased with proceeds from exercise of such
    options at average market price ...........................................                69,000           131,000
    

Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
    as adjusted ...............................................................             3,609,000         3,748,000
                                                                                           ==========        ==========

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE ....................................................            $      .03        $      .18
                                                                                           ==========        ==========



NET INCOME ....................................................................            $  106,000        $  677,000
                                                                                           ==========        ==========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding .................................             3,540,000         3,617,000

Number of shares purchasable upon exercise of options, reduced by the number of
    shares which could have been purchased with proceeds from exercise of such
    options at the greater of period-end market price or average market price .                69,000           140,000
                                                                                           ----------        ----------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
    as adjusted ...............................................................             3,609,000         3,757,000
                                                                                           ==========        ==========

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE,
    ASSUMING FULL DILUTION ....................................................            $      .03        $      .18
                                                                                           ==========        ==========
</TABLE>
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAPR06-0422INTHEMATTEROFTHEPETITIONOFMARCA.GREENDORFER•:7-,3,3SEP292020BovvenGreenwoodClerkofSupremeCourtStateofMontanaORDERMarcA.GreendorferhaspetitionedtheCourttowaivethethree-yeartestrequirernentfortheMultistateProfessionalResponsibilityExarnination(MPRE)forpurposesofhisapplicationforadmissionbymotiontotheStateBarofMontana.Byrule,applicantsforadrnissionbymotionmustprovideevidenceoftherequisitescoreonanMPREtaken"withinthreeyearsprecedingthedateoftheapplicationforadrnission."RuleIV.A.3,RulesofAdmission.GreendorferpassedtheMPREin1996whenseekingadmissiontothepracticeoflawintheStateofNewYork,wherehewasadmitted.HehasalsobeenadmittedtotheStateBarofCalifornia.Greendorferhaspracticedlawforover23years"withoutanyethicalordisciplinaryissuesinanyjurisdictionwherelicensedorwhereadmittedprohadvice."Goodcauseappearing,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthepetitionofMarcA.Greendorfertowaivethethree-yeartestrequirementfortheMPREforpurposesofhiscurrentapplicationforadrnissionbymotiontotheStateBarofMontanaisGRANTED.TheClerkshallmailacopyofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheAdministratoroftheBoardofBarExarnineo,attheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthis---2..AdayofSepternber,2020.ChiefJustice09/29/2020Case Number: PR 06-0422Justices
§ 238.161 Applicability. ( a ) *Applicability for foreign savings and loan holding companies with total consolidated assets of more than $250 billion* — ( 1 ) *General.* A foreign savings and loan holding company must comply with the stress test requirements set forth in this section beginning on the first day of the ninth quarter following the date on which its average total consolidated assets exceed $250 billion.
( 2 ) *Cessation of requirements.* A foreign savings and loan holding company will remain subject to requirements of this subpart until the date on which the foreign savings and loan holding company's total consolidated assets are below $250 billion for each of four most recent calendar quarters.
( b ) [Reserved]
Martin, Michael (OST) 

Subject: FW: Notice of Extension 

From: Lane Rodgers rmailto:lrodqers(g)www.qreenville.ms.us] 

Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:10 PM 

To: i^artin, l^lichael (OST) 

Subject: RE: Notice of Extension 

r^Ichael, 

The community of Greenville, MS and the Mid Delta Regional Airport will not grant a waiver from the twin engined aircraft 

required by 49 U.S.C. 41732(b)(5) at this time. 

Again, Greenville requests of the Department that the pending rebid RFP for our market have a due date in mid January. 

so as to permit us adequate time to recruit potential bidders over the vearend Holidays. 

Lane Rodgers CM. 

Airport Director 2: 

Mid Delta Regional Airport 7J •, 1 ri 

1 '-J a :::•::, l-n-^ 

— oO O
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert S. KendallRobert S. Kendall
Chief Executive Officer
June 20, 2005
 13
§ 217.31 Mechanics for calculating risk-weighted assets for general credit risk. ( a ) *General risk-weighting requirements.* A Board-regulated institution must apply risk weights to its exposures as follows: ( 1 ) A Board-regulated institution must determine the exposure amount of each on-balance sheet exposure, each OTC derivative contract, and each off-balance sheet commitment, trade and transaction-related contingency, guarantee, repo-style transaction, financial standby letter of credit, forward agreement, or other similar transaction that is not: ( i ) An unsettled transaction subject to § 217.38;
( ii ) A cleared transaction subject to § 217.35;
( iii ) A default fund contribution subject to § 217.35;
( iv ) A securitization exposure subject to §§ 217.41 through 217.45; or
( v ) An equity exposure (other than an equity OTC derivative contract) subject to §§ 217.51 through 217.53.
( 2 ) The Board-regulated institution must multiply each exposure amount by the risk weight appropriate to the exposure based on the exposure type or counterparty, eligible guarantor, or financial collateral to determine the risk-weighted asset amount for each exposure.
( b ) Total risk-weighted assets for general credit risk equals the sum of the risk-weighted asset amounts calculated under this section.
CONSULTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
This  Consulting  and  Services Agreement (this  "Agreement")  is
entered  into  as  of  June  5,2000 between  eConnect,  a  Nevada
corporation, (the "Company" and Charles Yourshaw, "Consultant").
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.  Term. The Company hereby retains Consultant as an independent
consultant,  with the duties particularized in Section  2  hereof
and  subject to other terms and conditions particularized herein,
and  Consultant hereby agrees to act as such for the Company, for
the  period  commencing on the date hereof and  expiring  on  the
completion by Consultant of the Services (as defined in Section 2
hereof).
2.   Duties.  During  the  Term,  Consultant  shall  devote   his
reasonable  best efforts to Performing the Services  (as  defined
hereinbelow)  on behalf of the Company, at such reasonable  times
and  places  as determined by Consultant. The Company understands
and  hereby  expressly  acknowledges  that  the  Services  to  be
provided  to  the  Company by Consultant pursuant  to  the  terms
hereof  shall be on a non- exclusive basis only. As  employed  in
this  Agreement, Services shall mean: Marketing and promotion  of
the eCashPad to international markets.
3.  Consideration to Consultant for Services. In consideration of
the Services to be rendered by Consultant to the Company pursuant
to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company shall  pay  Consultant  the
issuance of 80,000 S-8 consultant free trading shares, in lieu of
cash payment.
4.  Representation of Authority. The Company and Consultant  each
hereby  represents and warrants that has the necessary power  and
authority  to enter into and deliver this Agreement,  to  perform
its  obligations  hereunder  and to  consummate  the  transaction
contemplated  hereby,  and  that  such  actions  have  been  duly
authorized  by, respectively, the Company and the  Consultant  in
accordance with applicable law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed
this  Consulting  and Services Agreement as  of  the  date  first
written above.
"THE COMPANY"
eConnect
Name: /s/ Thomas S. Hughes
Title: Chairman & CEO
"CONSULTANT"
By: /s/ Charles Yourshaw
Name: Charles Yourshaw
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 5, 2002

                                                 /s/ Josephine Chaus
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Josephine Chaus
                                                 Chairwoman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

September 11, 2009.
    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to this petition must be filed by October 20, 2009. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.622(b), Final DTV 
Table of Allotments, Television Broadcast Stations (Fond du Lac, 
Wisconsin) (MB Docket No. 09-115).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23927 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 264b.10 Certain grants excluded.

This part does not apply to grants and other forms of assistance to which § 108A of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 applies. *See* 22 U.S.C. 2458a.
PIEDAD PATINO,

 Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 

APPEALS COMMISSION and ST. 

ANNE'S NURSING CENTER & 

RESIDENCE,

 Appellees.

_______________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

CASE NO. 1D15-2625

Opinion filed June 24, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Piedad Patino, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, and Cristina A. Velez, Assistant General 

Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction is treated as a confession of 

error, the final order is quashed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM I OF FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                        75
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    87
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      88
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          69
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        88
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (95)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (95)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (12.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (12.25)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Haywood D. Cochrane, Jr., in my
individual capacity and as Director of Unilab Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration statements for the filing of
securities of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") and any and all filings made by or on behalf of the Company
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 17th day of June 1997.

                                          /s/ Haywood D. Cochrane
                                          -----------------------

                                          Haywood D. Cochrane, Jr.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2771 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2771

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize the New York City 
                     Watershed Protection Program.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2771

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize the New York City 
                     Watershed Protection Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    Section 1443(d)(4) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-
2(d)(4)) is amended by striking ``1997 through 2003'' and inserting 
``2003 through 2010''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6552

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. WILLIAM T. HOLLOMON, JR., Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00269-HEH-1; 3:08-cv-00146-HEH)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Hollomon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William T. Hollomon, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hollomon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hollomon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Thomas Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James T. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



|/s/JAMES T. TAYLORJames T. Taylor
Chief Executive Officer, President,
Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|March 30, 2005                                                                                               |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASA International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Alfred C. Angelone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


October 1, 2004                                          /s/ Alfred C. Angelone
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Alfred C. Angelone
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>