alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ODFL EXHIBIT 10.17.20 - 1Q2015


Exhibit 10.17.20


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
2012 PHANTOM STOCK PLAN


This First Amendment to the Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 2012 Phantom Stock Plan (“Plan”) is made and entered into by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (“Company”).  Defined terms used in the Plan, effective October 30, 2012, shall have the same meaning therein as herein. 
 
RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has deemed it advisable to amend Section 9.1 of the Plan to clarify Plan provisions related to domestic relations orders under Section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code; and 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to evidence these changes by this Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS DECLARED that upon approval of this Amendment by the Board of Directors on January 29, 2015, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows:


1.Section 9.1 is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


9.1    Assignment and Transfer. Except as may be necessary to fulfill a domestic relations order within the meaning of Code Section 414(p)(1)(B), Awards shall not be transferable other than by will or the laws of intestate succession and may be realized, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant or by his or her guardian or legal representative.  No Award or interest or right therein shall be liable for the debts, contracts, or engagements of the Participant or his successors in interest or shall be subject to disposition by transfer, alienation, anticipation, pledge, encumbrance, assignment, or any other means whether such disposition be voluntary or involuntary or by operation of law, by judgment, levy, attachment, garnishment, or any other legal or equitable proceedings (including bankruptcy), and any attempted disposition thereof shall be null and void and of no effect, except to the extent that such disposition is permitted by the preceding sentence. The Administrator may accelerate the time or schedule of payment from the Plan in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ii) to the extent necessary to fulfill the terms of a domestic relations order (as defined in Code Section 414(p)(1)(B)); provided, however, that any such distribution may be made only to the extent an Award is vested.


		
	2.
	Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall be unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect. 













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by the Company. 


OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.




By:    /s/ David S. Congdon            
David S. Congdon, President and Chief
Executive Officer 


ATTEST:




   /s/ Ross H. Parr            
Ross H. Parr
Vice President – Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary 


(Corporate Seal)





2
Exhibit 99.1




     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the NHP Retirement  Housing  Partners I Limited
Partnership  Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirement of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



                                                /s/ Robert Lankford
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Robert Lankford
                                                Chief executive officer




                                                /s/ Robert Lankford
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Robert Lankford
                                                Chief financial officer
§ 19.245 Notice of removal, suspension, or debarment. ( a ) *Notice to the public.* Upon the issuance of a final order for removal, suspension, or debarment of an independent public accountant or accounting firm from providing audit services, the Comptroller will make the order publicly available and provide notice of the order to the other Federal banking agencies.
( b ) *Notice to the Comptroller by accountants and firms.* An accountant or accounting firm that provides audit services to an insured national bank, insured Federal savings association, or insured Federal branch of a foreign bank must provide the Comptroller with written notice of: ( 1 ) Any currently effective order or other action described in § 19.243(a)(1)(vi) through (vii) or § 19.244(a)(2) and (3); and
( 2 ) Any currently effective action by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board under sections 105(c)(4)(C) or (G) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(C) or (G)).
( c ) *Timing of notice.* Written notice required by this paragraph (c) must be given no later than 15 calendar days following the effective date of an order or action, or 15 calendar days before an accountant or firm accepts an engagement to provide audit services, whichever date is earlier.
§ 215.8 Records of member banks. ( a ) *In general.* Each member bank shall maintain records necessary for compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Recordkeeping for insiders of the member bank.* Any recordkeeping method adopted by a member bank shall: ( 1 ) Identify, through an annual survey, all insiders of the bank itself; and
( 2 ) Maintain records of all extensions of credit to insiders of the bank itself, including the amount and terms of each such extension of credit.
( c ) *Recordkeeping for insiders of the member bank's affiliates.* Any recordkeeping method adopted by a member bank shall maintain records of extensions of credit to insiders of the member bank's affiliates by: ( 1 ) *Survey method.* ( i ) Identifying, through an annual survey, each insider of the member bank's affiliates; and
( ii ) Maintaining records of the amount and terms of each extension of credit by the member bank to such insiders; or
( 2 ) *Borrower inquiry method.* ( i ) Requiring as part of each extension of credit that the borrower indicate whether the borrower is an insider of an affiliate of the member bank; and
( ii ) Maintaining records that identify the amount and terms of each extension of credit by the member bank to borrowers so identifying themselves.
( 3 ) *Alternative recordkeeping methods for insiders of affiliates.* A member bank may employ a recordkeeping method other than those identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section if the appropriate Federal banking agency determines that the bank's method is at least as effective as the identified methods.
( d ) *Special rule for non-commercial lenders.* A member bank that is prohibited by law or by an express resolution of the board of directors of the bank from making an extension of credit to any company or other entity that is covered by this part as a company is not required to maintain any records of the related interests of the insiders of the bank or its affiliates or to inquire of borrowers whether they are related interests of the insiders of the bank or its affiliates.
EXHIBIT 10.4


                                 John R. Aitken
                             25022 Hollyberry Lane
                             Laguna Niguel CA 92677
                                  949/448 9810
                          johnaitken@worldnet.att.net

April 30, 2000


Ilyas Chaudhary, Chairman
Capco Energy, Inc.
2922 E. Chapman, Ste.202
Orange, CA  92869

Dear Ilyas:

This letter  confirms  that the  arrangement  between  Capco  Energy,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  ("Capco")  and me regarding  settlement  of amounts owed to me for
services rendered to Capco during the period to May 1, 2000, is as follows:

The  amount of $35,000 to be paid in 2  installments,  being  $10,000 on May 15,
2000,  and  $25,000 on June 30, 2000  respectively.  Capco will also issue 5,000
shares of registered,  fully paid,  nonassessable  common stock of Capco Energy,
Inc.  Registration  of such  shares  will  take  place  via an S-8  Registration
statement to be filed by June 1, 2000.

Thank you for your agreement on this matter.

Sincerely,


/s/ John R. Aitken
John R. Aitken
#### Sousania *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 22,071.

Filed April 17, 1912.]

From Criminal Court of Marion County (38,816) ; *Joseph T. Marlcey,*Judge.

Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Theodora Sousania. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*Wm. E. Riley, Groninger £ Groninger,*for appellant.

*Thomas M. Honan,*Attorney-General, *Edwin Corr, Thomas H. Branaman*and *James E. McCullough,*for the State.

Monks, J.

The questions presented by the record in this case are in all respects the same as those presented and decided in the case of *Christison*v. *State*(1912) *ante,*363, 98 N. E. 113, and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.
42658.

#### COOGLER, Executor, et al. v. DILLASHAW.

*Frankum, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.*

Argued March 8, 1967

Decided April 5, 1967.

*Marvin G. Russell, Turner Paschal,*for appellants.

*Reeves & Collier, Rex T. Reeves, Merrell H. Collier,*for appellee.

Deen, Judge.

In *Dillashaw v. Coogler,*114 Ga. App. 139 (150 SE2d 161), an action for wrongful death by drowning against the proprietor of a swimming pool, it was held that a verdict was demanded in favor of the defendant as against each allegation of negligence charged. The present action for funeral expenses which sets up the same facts and the same allegations of negligence was heard on a motion for summary judgment, the evidence introduced being the brief of evidence in the wrongful death action. The two actions are therefore identical, with one exception. In the former action it was established that an autopsy had disclosed five bruises on the head of the deceased child, and the expert testimony was to the fact that these had been sustained very shortly before death and would likely have rendered him unconscious so that he drowned. There is in the present record in addition an affidavit to the effect that the boy had received the bruises prior to the day on which he was drowned. Such evidence does not help the plaintiff, since it shows only that the deceased did not receive these physical injuries while in the defendant’s pool. Its effect is to further demonstrate non-negligence rather than negligence. It having been held that the evidence adduced requires a finding of non-liability on the part of the defendant, it was error to deny the motion for summary judgment.

*Judgment reversed.*
# C_2022267EN.01000301.xml

| 12.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 July 2022

(2022/C 267/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0098 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84540 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6943 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9908 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2990 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,592 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 408,22 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7968 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9430 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,5447 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4910 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3140 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,9265 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6466 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4178 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1634 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7793 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 131,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4704 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,574 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,585 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3673 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7845 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,2435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0098

JPY

Japanese yen

138,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84540

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6943

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9908

ISK

Iceland króna

139,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2990

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,592

HUF

Hungarian forint

408,22

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7968

RON

Romanian leu

4,9430

TRY

Turkish lira

17,5447

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4910

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3140

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,9265

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6466

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4178

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,36

ZAR

South African rand

17,1634

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7793

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 131,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4704

PHP

Philippine peso

56,574

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,585

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3673

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7845

INR

Indian rupee

80,2435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

§ 249.34 Cash flows related to Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding. ( a ) *Treatment of Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding.* Notwithstanding any other section of this part and except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, outflow amounts and inflow amounts related to Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding and the assets securing Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding are excluded from the calculation of a Board-regulated institution's total net cash outflow amount calculated under § 249.30.
( b ) *Exception.* To the extent the Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding is secured by securities, debt obligations, or other instruments issued by the Board-regulated institution or one of its consolidated subsidiaries, the Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding is not subject to paragraph (a) of this section and this outflow amount must be included in the Board-regulated institution's total net cash outflow amount calculated under § 249.30.
[85 FR 26841, May 6, 2020]
# - State 

# of -- 

# North Dakota Office of the Governor 

## Jack Dalrymple Governor

Mr. Shaun McGrath Regional Administrator Region 8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1595 Wynkoop St. Denver, Colorado 80202- 1129 Dear Mr. McGrath: 

## June 14, 2013

The enclosed North Dakota 1422 UIC program application for Class VI primacy enforcement responsibility is hereby formally submitted for USEP A approval. The application contains all the elements required for submission under 40 CFR Part 145 .22. The State of North Dakota has the statutory authority, the manpower, and the expertise through the North Dakota Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas Division to effectively implement the Class VI Underground Injection Control program. I hereby request an expedited EPA review and approval of the North Dakota Class VI primacy application.

600 E Boulevard Ave. • Bismarck, ND 58505-0001 • Phone: 701.328.2200 • Fax: 701.328 .2205 • governor.nd.gov
<PAGE>   1

                        STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                  (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      THREE        THREE
                                                      MONTHS       MONTHS
                                                      ENDED        ENDED
                                                     12/31/97     12/31/96
                                                     --------     -------- 
    BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

<S>                                                    <C>          <C>   
Weighted average of common stock outstanding           11,877       10,608
                                                     ========      =======

Net Loss                                             $(10,145)     $(7,198)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements                    (628)        --
                                                     --------      -------
Net loss used in basic loss per share                $(10,773)     $(7,198)
                                                     ========      =======
        Basic loss per share                         $  (0.91)     $ (0.68)
                                                     ========      =======
    DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Weighted average of common stock outstanding           11,877       10,608
Total weighted average shares outstanding used in
  diluted loss per share computation (1)               11,877       10,608
                                                     ========      =======
Net loss                                             $(10,145)     $(7,198)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements                    (628)        --
                                                     --------      -------
Net loss used in diluted earnings per share          $(10,773)     $(7,198)
                                                     ========      =======
             DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE (1)              $  (0.91)     $ (0.68)
                                                     ========      =======

</TABLE>


(1) Due to losses resulting in anti-dilution, same as amount used in basic
computation.


                                       23
#### § 219.1 Authority, purpose and scope.

This subpart of Regulation S (12 CFR part 219, subpart A) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) under section 1115 of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (the Act) (12 U.S.C. 3415). It establishes the rates and conditions for reimbursement of reasonably necessary costs directly incurred by financial institutions in assembling or providing customer financial records to a government authority pursuant to the Act.

[60 FR 233, Jan. 3, 1995]
§ 238.141 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: *Advanced approaches* means the risk-weighted assets calculation methodologies at 12 CFR part 217, subpart E, as applicable.
*Baseline scenario* means a set of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company and that reflect the consensus views of the economic and financial outlook.
*Capital action* means any issuance or redemption of a debt or equity capital instrument, any capital distribution, and any similar action that the Federal Reserve determines could impact a savings and loan holding company's consolidated capital.
*Covered company* means: ( 1 ) A Category II savings and loan holding company;
( 2 ) A Category III savings and loan holding company; or
( 3 ) A savings and loan holding company with average total consolidated assets of greater than $250 billion.
*Planning horizon* means the period of at least nine consecutive quarters, beginning on the first day of a stress test cycle over which the relevant projections extend.
*Pre-provision net revenue* means the sum of net interest income and non-interest income less expenses before adjusting for loss provisions.
*Provision for credit losses* means: ( 1 ) With respect to a covered company that has adopted the current expected credit losses methodology under GAAP, the provision for credit losses, as would be reported by the covered company on the FR Y-9C in the current stress test cycle; and
( 2 ) With respect to a covered company that has not adopted the current expected credit losses methodology under GAAP, the provision for loan and lease losses as would be reported by the covered company on the FR Y-9C in the current stress test cycle.
*Regulatory capital ratio* means a capital ratio for which the Board has established minimum requirements for the savings and loan holding company by regulation or order, including, as applicable, the company's regulatory capital ratios calculated under 12 CFR part 217 and the deductions required under 12 CFR 248.12; except that the company shall not use the advanced approaches to calculate its regulatory capital ratios.
*Scenarios* are those sets of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company that the Board determines are appropriate for use in the company-run stress tests, including, but not limited to, baseline and severely adverse scenarios.
*Severely adverse scenario* means a set of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company and that overall are significantly more severe than those associated with the baseline scenario and may include trading or other additional components.
*Stress test* means a process to assess the potential impact of scenarios on the consolidated earnings, losses, and capital of a covered company over the planning horizon, taking into account its current condition, risks, exposures, strategies, and activities.
*Stress test cycle* means the period beginning on January 1 of a calendar year and ending on December 31 of that year.
42479.

#### HATCHER v. SPAETH.

Deen, Judge.

The plaintiff Spaeth sued on an oral contract for prize money, alleging that he earned his living as a billiard player; that Hatcher and others induced him to enter a tournament on the understanding that the first prize winner woud be awarded $2,500 and the second prize winner $1,500; that plaintiff thereupon came to Columbus to participate in the tournament; that he won first prize in one event and second prize in another, for which he was paid only $1,500, and that the defendants accordingly owe him $2,500. On the trial of the case the jury found for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. The defendant contends that the verdict and judgment are void for the reason that he is suing on an express contract and is entitled to $2,500 or nothing. *Held:*

The plaintiff’s testimony may be reasonably construed as an admission that he understood, after arriving in Columbus but before participating in the tournament, that the prizes originally mentioned could not be awarded because gate receipts did not measure up to expectations. A day before the tournament, according to the plaintiff’s testimony, he was told by the defendant that they would have to cut the prize money or else refund expenses of participants and call off the match. The plaintiff further testified that, about five *96minutes before the last match was called, the defendant told him the first prize would have to be cut to $800; that he refused to play; that the defendant then offered him an additional $200 and he went ahead and played, winning the match; that he was paid the $1,000 agreed on for that match, and was paid $500 of the agreed $1,500 for placing second in another match. From this testimony the jury could have found that, as to the first prize money, there was an accord and satisfaction, and then have awarded the $1,000 to apply to the agreement for second prize money. There is accordingly some evidence to support the verdict in the amount rendered. Nor can the defendant obtain a reversal on the ground that the plaintiff, if entitled to recover at all, should have received a larger amount than awarded. *Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell,*202 Ga. 868 (45 SE2d 211, 174 ALR 757).

*Frankum, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.*

Submitted January 9, 1967

Decided January 25, 1967.

*Pay, Owens, Keil & Hirsch, Milton Hirsch,*for appellant.

*Roberts <& Thornton, Jack M. Thornton,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*