alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.303 Bank service provider notification. ( a ) A bank service provider is required to notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible when the bank service provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to such banking organization for four or more hours. ( 1 ) A bank-designated point of contact is an email address, phone number, or any other contact(s), previously provided to the bank service provider by the banking organization customer.
( 2 ) If the banking organization customer has not previously provided a bank-designated point of contact, such notification shall be made to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer of the banking organization customer, or two individuals of comparable responsibilities, through any reasonable means.
( b ) The notification requirement in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any scheduled maintenance, testing, or software update previously communicated to a banking organization customer.
#### § 1808.627 Fraud, waste and abuse.

Any person who becomes aware of the existence or apparent existence of fraud, waste or abuse of any Guarantee, Bond, Bond Loan or Secondary Loan provided under this interim rule must report such incidents to the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
§ 1269.3 Standby letters of credit on behalf of housing associates. ( a ) *Housing associates.* Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm on behalf of housing associates standby letters of credit that are fully secured by collateral described in § 1266.17(b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this chapter, and that otherwise comply with the requirements of this part, for any of the following purposes: ( 1 ) To assist housing associates in facilitating residential housing finance;
( 2 ) To assist housing associates in facilitating community lending;
( 3 ) To assist housing associates with asset/liability management; or
( 4 ) To provide housing associates with liquidity or other funding.
( b ) *SHFA associates.* Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm on behalf of SHFA associates standby letters of credit that are fully secured by collateral described in § 1266.17(b)(2)(i)(A),(B) or (C) of this chapter, and that otherwise comply with the requirements of this part, for the purpose of facilitating residential or commercial mortgage lending that benefits individuals or families meeting the income requirements in section 142(d) or 143(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 142(d) or 143(f)).
[63 FR 65699, Nov. 30, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 8265, Feb. 18, 2000; 65 FR 44431, July 18, 2000; 75 FR 8240, Feb. 24, 2010; 75 FR 76623, Dec. 9, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal Management, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



  /s/ Albert A. Cozzi
-------------------------------
Albert A. Cozzi
Vice-Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
October 30, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 19.29 Summary disposition. ( a ) *In general.* The ALJ will recommend that the Comptroller issue a final order granting a motion for summary disposition if the undisputed pleaded facts, admissions, affidavits, stipulations, documentary evidence, matters as to which official notice may be taken, and any other evidentiary materials properly submitted in connection with a motion for summary disposition show: ( 1 ) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact; and
( 2 ) The moving party is entitled to a decision in its favor as a matter of law.
( b ) *Filing of motions and responses.* — ( 1 ) Any party who believes there is no genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that the party is entitled to a decision as a matter of law may move at any time for summary disposition in its favor of all or any part of the proceeding. Any party, within 20 days after service of such a motion, or within such time period as allowed by the ALJ, may file a response to such motion.
( 2 ) A motion for summary disposition must be accompanied by a statement of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue. Such motion must be supported by documentary evidence, which may take the form of admissions in pleadings, stipulations, depositions, investigatory depositions, transcripts, affidavits, and any other evidentiary materials that the moving party contends supports the moving party's position. The motion must also be accompanied by a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention of the moving party. Any party opposing a motion for summary disposition must file a statement setting forth those material facts as to which the opposing party contends a genuine dispute exists. Such opposition must be supported by evidence of the same type as that submitted with the motion for summary disposition and a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention that summary disposition would be inappropriate.
( c ) *Hearing on motion.* At the written request of any party or on the ALJ's own motion, the ALJ may hear oral argument on the motion for summary disposition.
( d ) *Decision on motion.* Following receipt of a motion for summary disposition and all responses thereto, the ALJ will determine whether the moving party is entitled to summary disposition. If the ALJ determines that summary disposition is warranted, the ALJ will submit a recommended decision to that effect to the Comptroller. If the ALJ finds that no party is entitled to summary disposition, the ALJ will make a ruling denying the motion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal Management, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Robert C. Larry
-------------------------------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
July 28, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

OLIVER BAKEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

FOR PUBLICATION

November 10, 2022

v No. 357195

Macomb Circuit Court

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE 

MIDWEST,

LC No. 2019-005246-NF

Defendant-Appellee,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, 

and MICHIGAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

PLACEMENT FACILITY,

Defendants.

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J., and JANSEN and SWARTZLE, JJ.

JANSEN, J. (concurring)

I concur in the majority opinion, but write separately to address one point. Plaintiff first 

testified that it was not his signature on the attendant care forms, and then testified that his signature 

had been copied. If it is plaintiff’s contention that a forgery occurred, the burden is on him at the 

summary disposition phase to make an offer of proof. If the party moving for summary disposition 

under MCR 2.116(C)(10) meets its initial burden of supporting its position by affidavits, 

depositions, admissions, or other documentary evidence, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party 

to establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists. Quinto v Cross and Peters Co, 451 Mich 

358, 362; 547 NW2d 314 (1996). The nonmoving party may not rely on mere allegations or 

denials in pleadings to do so. Id. “If the opposing party fails to present documentary evidence 

establishing the existence of a material factual dispute, the motion is properly granted.” Id. at 363. 

As noted by the majority, plaintiff provided no evidence that his signature had been copied on the 
-2-

form. Contrary to plaintiff’s assertions, the burden to prove that such a forgery exists rests on him, 

and not the insurance company. I therefore concur in the rest of the majority opinion.

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6900

BILLY RAY PARKER,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RICK BURRIS, Sheriff of Stanly County, North Carolina; 

CAPT. LANE BURRIS; DEPUTY DARRIN POPLIN; LT. TOMMY HUDSON; 

SARAH MILLS, LPN,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland 

Biggs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Ray Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Houghton Flanagan, 

Virginia Marie Wooten, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, 

Charlotte, North Carolina; Walter Gregory Merritt, Jay C.
2

Salsman, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Billy Ray Parker appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Parker v. Burris, No. 1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA (M.D.N.C. May 8, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Sample Pre-Renovation Form 

This sample form may be used by firms to document compliance with the requirements of the Federal 

Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program. 

Occupant Confirmation 

Pamphlet Receipt 

___ I have received a copy of the lead hazard information pamphlet informing me of the potential risk of the 

lead hazard exposure from renovation activity to be performed in my dwelling unit. I received this 

pamphlet before the work began. 

Printed Name of Owner-occupant 

Signature of Owner-occupant Signature Date 

Renovator’s Self Certification Option (for tenant-occupied dwellings only)

Instructions to Renovator: If the lead hazard information pamphlet was delivered but a tenant signature was not 

obtainable, you may check the appropriate box below. 

___ Declined – I certify that I have made a good faith effort to deliver the lead hazard information pamphlet 

to the rental dwelling unit listed below at the date and time indicated and that the occupant declined to 

sign the confirmation of receipt. I further certify that I have left a copy of the pamphlet at the unit with 

the occupant. 

___ Unavailable for signature – I certify that I have made a good faith effort to deliver the lead hazard 

information pamphlet to the rental dwelling unit listed below and that the occupant was unavailable to 

sign the confirmation of receipt. I further certify that I have left a copy of the pamphlet at the unit by 

sliding it under the door or by (fill in how pamphlet was left). 

Printed Name of Person Certifying Delivery Attempted Delivery Date 

Signature of Person Certifying Lead Pamphlet Delivery 

Unit Address

Note Regarding Mailing Option –– As an alternative to delivery in person, you may mail the lead 

hazard information pamphlet to the owner and/or tenant. Pamphlet must be mailed at least 7 days 

before renovation. Mailing must be documented by a certificate of mailing from the post office. 

25
#### § 223.12 What is the maximum amount of covered transactions that a member bank may enter into with all affiliates?

A member bank may not engage in a covered transaction with any affiliate if the aggregate amount of the member bank's covered transactions with all affiliates would exceed 20 percent of the capital stock and surplus of the member bank.
#### James C. Carr, Plaintiff, *v.*George C. Butler et al., Defendants.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

November, 1900.)

Appeal — Abandoned by failure to file case under General Rules of Practice No. 35 — Remedy.

An appeal must be deemed abandoned where the case is not filed within ten days after its settlement — no extension of time having been granted.

The remedy of the party failing to file is to move to have his default opened and, if this is granted, he will then be in a position to file his ease regularly.

Motion to resettle a case on appeal.

Thomas O’Callaghan, Jr., for motion.

W. F. Goldbeck opposed.

Gilbersleeve, J.

The defendants move to resettle the case on appeal herein by allowing portions of the exhibits to be printed instead of all of such exhibits. The plaintiff objects on the ground that the defendants’ appeal must be deemed abandoned, for the reason that they did not have the case on appeal filed within ten days after it had been settled. Rule 35 of the General Rules of Practice reads as follows, viz.: *“*When a party makes a case, or a case and exceptions, he shall procure the same to be signed by "the judge or referee and filed, within ten days after it shall have been settled, or it shall be deemed abandoned, unless the time is extended by order.” In the ease at bar the case was settled on October 10, 1900, and handed down to the clerk of Part VII, *658Trial Term, of this court, who caused an announcement of such settlement to appear in the Law Journal of October 11, 1900. The defendants, however, failed to comply with the requirements of rule 35, and ten days elapsed without the filing of the said case on appeal. On or about October 25, 1900, defendants served notice of the motion to resettle. I do not see how they can prevail on such a motion under the facts above narrated. As we have seen, where an attorney has made a case on appeal, his failure to have it signed by the judge and filed, within ten days after it has been settled, operates as an abandonment of the case, unless the time is extended by order. Mo such order was here obtained. The proper course of a party who is thus in default is to move to have his default opened, after which, if his application is granted, he will he in a position to have his case filed regularly. Rothschild v. Rio Grande W. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 406. Motion denied, but without costs.

Motion denied, without costs.
§ 1282.65 Enterprise data integrity. ( a ) *Certification.* ( 1 ) The senior officer of each Enterprise who is responsible for submitting the fourth quarter Annual Mortgage Report and the AHAR under sections 309(m) and (n) of the Fannie Mae Charter Act or sections 307(e) and (f) of the Freddie Mac Act, as applicable, or for submitting any other report(s), data or information for which certification is requested in writing by the Director, shall certify such report(s), data or information.
( 2 ) The certification shall state as follows: “To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided herein is true, correct and complete.”
( b ) *Adjustment to correct errors, omissions or discrepancies in AHAR data.* FHFA shall determine the official housing goal performance figure for each Enterprise under the housing goals on an annual basis. FHFA may resolve any error, omission or discrepancy by adjusting the Enterprise's official housing goal performance figure. If the Director determines that the year-end data reported by an Enterprise for a year preceding the latest year for which data on housing goals performance was reported to FHFA contained a material error, omission or discrepancy, the Director may increase the corresponding housing goal for the current year by the number of mortgages (or dwelling units) that the Director determines were overstated in the prior year's goal performance.
DLD
- 163 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12

- 1191

___________ DARREN

- JAMES MICHAELS , Grantor/Beneficiary Complainant, In Personam, Appellant

v. LISA ECHEVERRI VICKERS, trustee, In Personam; JEFF ATWATERS, trustee, In Personam; LADASIAH JACKSON FORD, In Personam

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 11

- cv - 00157 ) District Judge: Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 April 19, 2012 Before: AMBRO, JORDAN and VANASKIE , Circuit Judges (Opinion filed April 30, 2012 )

_________ OPINION

_________2 PER CURIAM In August 2011, Darren

- James Michaels filed a pro se complaint in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania . He filed an amended complaint in September 2011, alleging breach of trust , trespass , and fraud. He sough t declaratory relief, specific performance of a trust , a general injunction to restrain, and the return of
trust res . He emphasize d that his is a “suit in equity.” His claims relate to a delinquent Florida child support order . The appellees are all Flor ida residents and employees of the Florida government

. The District Court dismissed the complaint on December 15, 2011, for lack of subject mat ter jurisdiction. It determined that Michaels had failed to allege any facts establishing a federal question. His claims implicated state law concept s only. Furthermore, the District Court found, it lacked jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship grounds. Michaels failed to demonstrate the requisite jurisdictional amount in controversy, as his claims we re based in equity and he sought no money damages. The District Court also noted that Michaels claimed to be a “‘state national’ o f the Republic of Pennsylvania,” but the record indicate d that he is a resident of Florida, as are the remaining parties. Michaels fi led a motion to vacate or reconsider on January 3, 2012 , and a notice of appeal on January 19, 2012. The District Court denied the motion to vacate and reconsider on April 4, 2012

. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm

. The District Court correctly noted that the complaint does not allege a violation of the Constitution or3 federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Additionally, for the reasons stated by the District Court, Michaels fails to demonstrate any basis for diversity juri sdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §
1332. Because we conclude that this appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm. See Michaels has filed numerous motions in this Court while his appeal has been pending , including motions to expedite, for special chancellor and special master, for sanctions against appellees, and numerous motions to strike appellees’ responses and pleadings. All of his motions are denied. Appel l ees’ motion for the issuance of an order to show cause is denied as unnecessary. 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.
# C_2021412EN.01000101.xml

| 11.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 412/01)

Last publication

OJ C 401, 4.10.2021

Past publications

OJ C 391, 27.9.2021

OJ C 382, 20.9.2021

OJ C 368, 13.9.2021

OJ C 357, 6.9.2021

OJ C 349, 30.8.2021

OJ C 338, 23.8.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 222.42 Reasonable policies and procedures concerning the accuracy and integrity of furnished information. ( a ) *Policies and procedures.* Each furnisher must establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information relating to consumers that it furnishes to a consumer reporting agency. The policies and procedures must be appropriate to the nature, size, complexity, and scope of each furnisher's activities.
( b ) *Guidelines.* Each furnisher must consider the guidelines in appendix E of this part in developing its policies and procedures required by this section, and incorporate those guidelines that are appropriate.
( c ) *Reviewing and updating policies and procedures.* Each furnisher must review its policies and procedures required by this section periodically and update them as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness.