alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans will be held on Monday, November 2, 2009, in the Coolidge Room at the Washington Marriot Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW., Washington, DC, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide the Secretary of Veterans Affairs with an on-going assessment of the effectiveness of the policies, organizational structures, and services of the Department in assisting homeless Veterans. The Committee shall assemble and review information relating to the needs of homeless Veterans and provide on-going advice on the most appropriate means of providing assistance to homeless Veterans. The Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.

The agenda will include briefings from VA and other officials regarding services for homeless Veterans. The Committee will also discuss final preparation of its upcoming annual report and recommendations to the Secretary.

Those wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Pete Dougherty, Department of Veterans Affairs, at (202) 461-7401. No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the public. However, the Committee will accept written comments from interested parties on issues affecting homeless Veterans. Such comments should be referred to the Committee at the following address: Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans, Homeless Veterans Programs Office (075D), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24311 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EGU MACT RIA -- Interagency comments on Chapter 7 

 12/14/2011 04:31 PM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Attached are interagency comments on the RIA Chapter 7. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

Chapter 7_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563.docx
# C_2011034EN.01000601.xml

| 3.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/6

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 34/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 13 October 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68560 |
| Decision number | : | 390/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Region | : | South electoral district, North West electoral district and North East electoral district |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Incentives for Initial Investments in Iceland |
| Legal basis | : | Act No 99/2010 on Incentives for Initial Investment in Iceland |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Regional development |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant, tax and fee concessions and sale/lease of land below market value |
| Budget | : | Annual budgetary decisions for direct grants. Estimated foregone revenues in tax measures EUR 17 million annually |
| Intensity | : | 15 % (25 % for medium-sized companies and 35 % for small companies) |
| Duration | : | From publication of the final text of the scheme following the adoption of the Authority’s decision until 31 December 2013 |
| Economic sector | : | All sectors except the financial sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Industry |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 150 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

13 October 2010

Case number

:

68560

Decision number

:

390/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Region

:

South electoral district, North West electoral district and North East electoral district

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Incentives for Initial Investments in Iceland

Legal basis

:

Act No 99/2010 on Incentives for Initial Investment in Iceland

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Regional development

Form of aid

:

Direct grant, tax and fee concessions and sale/lease of land below market value

Budget

:

Annual budgetary decisions for direct grants. Estimated foregone revenues in tax measures EUR 17 million annually

Intensity

:

15 % (25 % for medium-sized companies and 35 % for small companies)

Duration

:

From publication of the final text of the scheme following the adoption of the Authority’s decision until 31 December 2013

Economic sector

:

All sectors except the financial sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Industry

Arnarhvoli

150 Reykjavik

ICELAND

Other information

:

Final text of the scheme will be published at http://www.idnadarraduneyti.is

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

San Diego,CA 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of ourreports dated March 4, 2005 relating to internal control over financial reporting of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and the financial statements of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2004incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the prospectuses constituting a part of the following registration statements: No. 333-18725 on Form S-8 to Form S-4, No. 333-18725 on Form S-3 to Form S-4,No. 333-56155 on Form S-3, No. 333-56157 on Form S-3, No. 333-69725 on Form S-3, No. 333-69727 on Form S-3, No. 333-72853 on Form S-3, No. 333-92179 on Form S-3, No. 333-92185 on Form S-8, No. 333-96181 on Form S-3, No. 333-34180 onForm S-3, No. 333-51284 on Form S-3, No. 333-51286 on Form S-8, No. 333-65712 on Form S-8, No. 333-75860 on Form S-3, No. 333-83372 on Form S-3, No. 333-101219 on Form S-8, No. 333-101221 on Form S-3, No. 333-13831 on Form S-3, No.333-103851 on Form S-3, No. 333-105378 on Form S-3, No. 333-106835 on Form S-3, No. 333-106860 on Form S-8, No. 333-107318 on Form S-3, and No. 333-121216 on Form S-8. 

 

 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, CA

March 8, 2005
NO. 12-19-00148-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CARLA KOLBER, 

APPELLANT

V.

JAMES MOORE AND MELINDA 

MOORE,

APPELLEES

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Carla Kolber, filed a notice of appeal from a February 25, 2019 order granting 

a motion for award of expenses/sanctions filed by Appellees, James Moore and Melinda Moore, 

and from a March 14, 2019 final judgment, to the extent that the February order merged with the 

final judgment. On October 7, Kolber filed an agreed motion to effectuate settlement. The motion 

states that the parties reached an agreement to settle the matter between them. Kolber requests 

rendition of judgment setting aside the February 25 order.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 sets forth the actions that this Court may take in 

accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). We may: (A) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement; (B) 

set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; or (C) abate the appeal and 

permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). 

Accordingly, we grant the agreed motion to effectuate settlement. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2)(A). We render judgment setting aside the trial court’s order of February 25, 2019, 
2

without regard to the merits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We remand the case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.1 See id. 

Opinion delivered October 17, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

 1 Kolber also requests that we dismiss the appeal. However, rendering judgment and remanding in 

accordance with Rule 42.1 disposes of this appeal without the need for dismissal. 
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 17, 2019

NO. 12-19-00148-CV

CARLA KOLBER,

Appellant

V.

JAMES MOORE AND MELINDA MOORE,

Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 00195-CCL-16)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the agreed motion of the Appellant to 

effectuate settlement, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to effectuate settlement be granted; judgment is 

rendered setting aside the trial court’s February 25, 2019 order without regard to the merits; the 

cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ 

settlement agreement, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51875-51876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNV912000.L16400000.PH0000.006F; 10-08807; TAS: 14X1109]


Notice of Public Meeting: Resource Advisory Councils, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the Department 
of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada will hold a 
joint meeting of its three

[[Page 51876]]

Resource Advisory Councils (RACs), the Sierra Front-Northwestern Great 
Basin RAC, the Northeastern Great Basin RAC, and the Mojave-Southern 
Great Basin RAC in Elko, Nevada. The meeting is open to the public and 
a public comment period will be available.
    Dates and Times: Thursday, November 19, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 5 
p.m., and Friday,
    November 20, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. A public comment period 
will be provided at 3 p.m. on Thursday, November 19.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rochelle Ocava, telephone: (775) 861-
6588, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfadb0bcb7bab3b3ba80b0bcbea9be9fbdb3b2f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d7f626e656861616852626e6c7b6c4d6f6160236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The three 15-member Nevada councils advise 
the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM Nevada State Director, 
on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public 
land management in Nevada. The meeting will be held at the Elko 
Convention Center, 700 Moren Way, Elko, Nevada. Agenda topics include a 
presentation and discussion of accomplishments during 2009 and the 
outlook for 2010 for the BLM in Nevada; opening remarks and closeout 
reports of the three RACs; breakout meetings of each group category; 
breakout meetings of the three RACs; discussion of a recreation 
subgroup of the existing RACs; and setting of schedules for meetings of 
the individual RACs for the upcoming year. An agenda will be available 
30 days prior to the meeting at http://www.blm.gov/nv. The public may 
provide written comments to the three RAC groups or the individual 
RACs. Individuals who plan to attend and need further information about 
the meeting or need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations may contact Rochelle 
Ocava.

Mike Holbert,
Deputy State Director, Nevada.
[FR Doc. E9-24348 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 217.403 GSIB surcharge.

(a) *General.* Subject to § 217.400(b)(2), a company identified as a global systemically important BHC pursuant to § 217.402 must calculate its GSIB surcharge on an annual basis by December 31 of each year. For any given year, subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the GSIB surcharge is equal to the greater of:

(1) The method 1 surcharge calculated in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section; and

(2) The method 2 surcharge calculated in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.

(b) *Method 1 surcharge* —

(1) *General.* The method 1 surcharge of a global systemically important BHC is the amount set forth in Table 1 of this section that corresponds to the global systemically important BHC's method 1 score, calculated pursuant to § 217.404.

| Method 1 score | Method 1 surcharge |
| --- | --- |
| Below 130 | 0.0 percent. |
| 130—229 | 1.0 percent. |
| 230—329 | 1.5 percent. |
| 330—429 | 2.0 percent. |
| 430—529 | 2.5 percent. |
| 530—629 | 3.5 percent. |

Table 1 to § 217.403—Method 1 Surcharge

(2) *Higher method 1 surcharges.* To the extent that the method 1 score of a global systemically important BHC equals or exceeds 630 basis points, the method 1 surcharge equals the sum of:

(i) 4.5 percent; and

(ii) An additional 1.0 percent for each 100 basis points that the global systemically important BHC's score exceeds 630 basis points.

(c) *Method 2 surcharge* —

(1) *General.* The method 2 surcharge of a global systemically important BHC is the amount set forth in Table 2 of this section that corresponds to the global systemically important BHC's method 2 score, calculated pursuant to § 217.405.

| Method 2 score | Method 2 surcharge |
| --- | --- |
| Below 130 | 0.0 percent. |
| 130—229 | 1.0 percent. |
| 230—329 | 1.5 percent. |
| 330—429 | 2.0 percent. |
| 430—529 | 2.5 percent. |
| 530—629 | 3.0 percent. |
| 630—729 | 3.5 percent. |
| 730—829 | 4.0 percent. |
| 830—929 | 4.5 percent. |
| 930—1029 | 5.0 percent. |
| 1030—1129 | 5.5 percent. |

Table 2 to § 217.403: Method 2 Surcharge

(2) *Higher method 2 surcharges.* To the extent that the method 2 score of a global systemically important BHC equals or exceeds 1130 basis points, the method 2 surcharge equals the sum of:

(i) 6.5 percent; and

(ii) An additional 0.5 percent for each 100 basis points that the global systemically important BHC's score exceeds 1130 basis points.

(d) *Effective date of an adjusted GSIB surcharge* —

(1) *Increase in GSIB surcharge.* An increase in the GSIB surcharge of a global systemically important BHC will take effect (*i.e.,* be incorporated into the maximum payout ratio under Table 1 to § 217.11) on January 1 of the year that is one full calendar year after the increased GSIB surcharge was calculated.

(2) *Decrease in GSIB surcharge.* A decrease in the GSIB surcharge of a global systemically important BHC will take effect (*i.e.,* be incorporated into the maximum payout ratio under Table 1 to § 217.11) on January 1 of the year immediately following the calendar year in which the decreased GSIB surcharge was calculated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2079
<PP&E>                                            3059
<DEPRECIATION>                                     372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2693363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2998
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2691595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4766
<SALES>                                           4257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4257
<CGS>                                             3375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                395643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (391386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (391386)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0810

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM195AD

AOT A330-32A3256 --- 8/24/11

AOT A340-32A4292 --- 8/24/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
1

Source: BLM 2007 

F i s h 

k 

Nuiqsut 

C r e e k 

K i k

r 

i a k r

k 

R i v e

o

r

r a

A R C T I C O C E A N 

Jud y

Cr e e

Miguakiak R. 

H a r r i

10 n

12 11

12 11 10

3 12 11 10

3 2 1 W 7 6 5 4

1 W 1 E 

8 

2 2 

9 

3 

3 4

5 4

5 

1 N 

1 E 

6 

2 2 

7 

3 3 

8 

4 

4 

9 

9 8 7 6 5

12 

11 

14 

10 

15 N 

13 

8 

4 

1 S 

0 6 12

Miles 5 

7 

3 

VISUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2 

6 

2 

3 

9 N 

5 

A 

1 W 

4 

C o l v i l l e 

Umiat 

Ikpikp

uk 

Rive

Atigaru Point 

B

r 

R i v

e

R i

e v

r 

K o g u s u k r u k 

Cape Halkett 

s o

a y 

Pitt Point 

Cape Simpson 

Sm i t h B a y 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

T e s h e k p u k L a k e 

Scenic Quality Ratings 

B 

C 

Map 3-45. Visual Resource Management Scenic Quality Ratings in the Northeast National Petroleum

Reserve - Alaska
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00345-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

REBECCA LYNN BARKER

, } APPEALED FROM 2ND DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER

Appellant is represented by Mr. Sten M. Langsjoen, appointed counsel. On May 22, 2015, the

time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief or a motion for extension of time. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

38.6(a). Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b), counsel was notified on May 27, 2015, that his brief was

past due and was given until June 8, 2015, to file a brief or otherwise explain the delay. No satisfactory

response has been received.

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(3), it is ORDERED that Honorable Bascom W. Bentley III,

Judge of the 2nd District Court of Cherokee County, Texas, shall immediately conduct a hearing to

determine (1) whether the appellant still desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) whether the appellant is

indigent and either needs counsel appointed, or appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal; or (3) if

the appellant is not indigent, whether a brief has not been completed because retained counsel has either

abandoned the appeal or because appellant has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a brief;

and (4) when appellant’s counsel anticipates that the appellant’s brief, if a brief is to be filed, will be

completed.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judge shall (1) make appropriate findings as to the above

set forth issues and (2) cause a record of the proceedings to be prepared.It is ADDITIONALLY ORDERED that once findings are made as to the above set forth issues,

if appellant is indigent, the judge shall (1) take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant’s

effective representation, which may include the appointment of new counsel and (2) make

recommendations to this Court regarding a proper filing date for the appellant’s brief.

It is FINALLY ORDERED that the supplemental clerk’s record (including any orders and

findings) and the reporter’s record of said hearing be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before July

10, 2015

.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 12 th Court of

Appeals District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas this the 10th day of June

2015

, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK

, CLERK

By:

______________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk