alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.5 Limitations on availability and assessments. ( a ) *Lending to undercapitalized insured depository institutions.* A Federal Reserve Bank may make or have outstanding advances to or discounts for a depository institution that it knows to be an undercapitalized insured depository institution, only: ( 1 ) If, in any 120-day period, advances or discounts from any Federal Reserve Bank to that depository institution are not outstanding for more than 60 days during which the institution is an undercapitalized insured depository institution; or
( 2 ) During the 60 calendar days after the receipt of a written certification from the chairman of the Board of Governors or the head of the appropriate federal banking agency that the borrowing depository institution is viable; or
( 3 ) After consultation with the Board of Governors. In unusual circumstances, when prior consultation with the Board is not possible, a Federal Reserve Bank should consult with the Board as soon as possible after extending credit that requires consultation under this paragraph (a)(3).
( b ) *Lending to critically undercapitalized insured depository institutions.* A Federal Reserve Bank may make or have outstanding advances to or discounts for a depository institution that it knows to be a critically undercapitalized insured depository institution only: ( 1 ) During the 5-day period beginning on the date the institution became a critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; or
( 2 ) After consultation with the Board of Governors. In unusual circumstances, when prior consultation with the Board is not possible, a Federal Reserve Bank should consult with the Board as soon as possible after extending credit that requires consultation under this paragraph (b)(2).
( c ) *Assessments.* The Board of Governors will assess the Federal Reserve Banks for any amount that the Board pays to the FDIC due to any excess loss in accordance with section 10B(b) of the Federal Reserve Act. Each Federal Reserve Bank shall be assessed that portion of the amount that the Board of Governors pays to the FDIC that is attributable to an extension of credit by that Federal Reserve Bank, up to 1 percent of its capital as reported at the beginning of the calendar year in which the assessment is made. The Board of Governors will assess all of the Federal Reserve Banks for the remainder of the amount it pays to the FDIC in the ratio that the capital of each Federal Reserve Bank bears to the total capital of all Federal Reserve Banks at the beginning of the calendar year in which the assessment is made, provided, however, that if any assessment exceeds 50 percent of the total capital and surplus of all Federal Reserve Banks, whether to distribute the excess over such 50 percent shall be made at the discretion of the Board of Governors.
[Reg. A, 67 FR 67787, Nov. 7, 2002]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 14, 2004                           /s/ Barton Heminover
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Barton Heminover
                                       Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 16 March 2006         

on the publication of the references of standard EN 143:2000 ‘Respiratory Devices — Particle filters — Requirements, testing, marking’ in accordance with Council Directive 89/686/EEC (personal protective equipment)

(notified under document number C(2006) 777)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/216/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the Standing Committee set up pursuant to Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The references of harmonised standard EN 143:2000 are replaced by the text set out in the Annex.

Article 2

Where, pursuant to Article 5(4) of Directive 89/686/EEC, Member States publish the references of the national standards transposing the harmonised standard referred to in Article 1, they shall add to that publication a warning identical to that provided for in the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 399, 30.12.1989, p. 18. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(3)OJ C 21, 24.1.2001, p. 2.

----

ANNEX

Publication of references of European harmonised standards in accordance with Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment

NOTE:

More information about harmonised standards on the Internet at http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(*1)  ESO: European Standardisation Organisation:

(*2)  Generally the date of cessation of presumption of conformity will be the date of withdrawal (‘dow’), set by the European Standardisation Organisation, but attention of users of these standards is drawn to the fact that in certain exceptional cases this can be otherwise.

----
§ 222.3 Definitions. For purposes of this part, unless explicitly stated otherwise: ( a ) *Act* means the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*).
( b ) *Affiliate* means any company that is related by common ownership or common corporate control with another company.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Company* means any corporation, limited liability company, business trust, general or limited partnership, association, or similar organization.
( e ) *Consumer* means an individual.
( f ) - ( h ) [Reserved]
( i ) *Common ownership or common corporate control* means a relationship between two companies under which: ( 1 ) One company has, with respect to the other company: ( i ) Ownership, control, or power to vote 25 percent or more of the outstanding shares of any class of voting security of a company, directly or indirectly, or acting through one or more other persons;
( ii ) Control in any manner over the election of a majority of the directors, trustees, or general partners (or individuals exercising similar functions) of a company; or
( iii ) The power to exercise, directly or indirectly, a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company, as the Board determines; or
( 2 ) Any other person has, with respect to both companies, a relationship described in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (i)(1)(iii) of this section.
( j ) [Reserved]
( k ) *Medical information* means: ( 1 ) Information or data, whether oral or recorded, in any form or medium, created by or derived from a health care provider or the consumer, that relates to: ( i ) The past, present, or future physical, mental, or behavioral health or condition of an individual;
( ii ) The provision of health care to an individual; or
( iii ) The payment for the provision of health care to an individual.
( 2 ) The term does not include: ( i ) The age or gender of a consumer;
( ii ) Demographic information about the consumer, including a consumer's residence address or e-mail address;
( iii ) Any other information about a consumer that does not relate to the physical, mental, or behavioral health or condition of a consumer, including the existence or value of any insurance policy; or
( iv ) Information that does not identify a specific consumer.
( l ) *Person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, trust, estate cooperative, association, government or governmental subdivision or agency, or other entity.
[Reg. V, 70 FR 70678, Nov. 22, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 63756, Nov. 9, 2007]
427 A.2d 251

#### Commonwealth v. McGovern, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Ronald M. Lucas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

David E. Grine, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and CAVANAUGH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT, dated and effective as of the 28th day of November,
2001, to the Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated July 1,
2000, by and among Unilab Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("The Company")
and Emmett C. Kane ("Executive"), is entered into for good and valid
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by
the parties hereto.

         WHEREAS, The parties desire to modify the terms of Executive's
employment with The Company; and

         WHEREAS, The Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment
Agreement to reflect the terms under which Executive will be employed henceforth
by The Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual
covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree that the Employment
Agreement shall be amended as follows:

     1.   TERM. The term set forth in Section 1 of the  Employment  Agreement is
          hereby  amended and  extended to continue  until July 1, 2004,  unless
          sooner  terminated  in  accordance  with  Sections  5  and  6  of  the
          Employment  Agreement.  There  shall be no  further  extension  of the
          Employment Agreement other than by written instrument executed by both
          parties hereto.

     2.   ENTIRE  AGREEMENT.  This Amendment amends and supercedes  Section 1 of
          the Employment  Agreement,  as set forth herein,  and  constitutes the
          entire  understanding  between the parties with respect to the subject
          matter hereof,  superseding all negotiations,  prior discussions,  and
          preliminary agreements,  and in the event of any conflict between this
          Amendment  and  the  Employment  Agreement  as to the  subject  matter
          hereof, the terms hereof shall control. Neither this Amendment nor the
          Employment  Agreement may be amended  except in a writing  executed by
          the parties hereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered the
Amendment as of the date first above written.

  UNILAB CORPORATION                               EXECUTIVE

  By:               /s/                                        /s/
        ------------------------------            ------------------------------
        Robert E. Whalen                           Emmett C. Kane
        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-127089 and No. 333-127090) and Form S-3 (No. 333-125051 and No. 333-126460) of our report dated May 20, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Calypte Biomedical Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a matter of emphasis paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP




San Francisco, California


November 11, 2011
# C_2009224EN.01001901.xml

| 17.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 13 May 2009

in Case E-6/08

EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligation — Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance of buildings)

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligation — Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance of buildings)

2009/C 224/09

In Case E-6/08, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to adopt or notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of the measures necessary to implement Articles 6-10 of the Act referred to at point 17 of Annex IV to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, i.e. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of that Act and under Article 7 EEA, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Henrik Bull, Judge, and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judge-Rapporteur, gave judgment on 13 May 2009, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time limit prescribed, the measures necessary to implement Articles 6-10 of Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of the Directive and Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time limit prescribed, the measures necessary to implement Articles 6-10 of Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of the Directive and Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        9900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
quarterly consolidated financial statements of UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such contained in UNUM 
Corporation's SEC Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         7,469,800
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      27,300
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,118,900
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  233,600
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              11,633,100
<CASH>                                          42,200
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             538,100
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,203,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,152,100
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,937,200
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,622,600
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                564,100
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,276,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,152,100
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,326,600
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            629,600
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  56,800
<BENEFITS>                                   1,751,600
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (60,500)<F1>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                272,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    82,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   190,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>This item contains the amounts of deferred and amortized policy acquisition
costs for the period presented.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7070
DANIEL EDWARD TATE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus CALVIN WEAVER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-883) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Edward Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tate v. Weaver , No. CA-96-883 (E.D. Va. June 3, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          6000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (5000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>