alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### §§ 217.156-217.160 [Reserved]
#### De Witt C. Wheeler, Jr., Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, of. counsel), for appellant.

M. P. O’Connor (J. Brownson Ker, of counsel), for respondent.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J.

The jury had a right to believe the testimony of plaintiff as against the five witnesses produced by the defendant. They had before them all of the witnesses and heard their testimony, and saw the manner in which they testified, and their judgment of defendant’s guilt and plaintiff’s innocence should be respected. We should not and will not interfere with the *765finding of the jury, unless it is clear that they were influenced by prejudice, bias or unfair considerations in their deliberation. No such accusation can be made herein, as we read the record.

The judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and Hascall, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 1270.3 Deposits from members. ( a ) Banks may accept demand and time deposits from members, reserving the right to require notice of intention to withdraw any part of time deposits. Rates of interest paid on all deposits shall be set by the Bank's board of directors (or, between regular meetings thereof, by a committee of directors selected by the board) or by the Bank President, if so authorized by the board. Unless otherwise specified by the board, a Bank President may delegate to any officer or employee of the Bank any authority he possesses under this section.
( b ) Each Bank shall at all times have at least an amount equal to the current deposits received from its members invested in: ( 1 ) Obligations of the United States;
( 2 ) Deposits in banks or trust companies; or
( 3 ) Advances with a remaining maturity not to exceed five years that are made to members in conformity with part 1266 of this chapter.
# Official Journal L 1/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 595 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 595 January 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2 of 4 January 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 laying down the principles for providing feedback on the performance of national competent authorities' sub-coordinators in the joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (ECB/2015/36) | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2 of 4 January 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 laying down the principles for providing feedback on the performance of national competent authorities' sub-coordinators in the joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (ECB/2015/36)

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-15967

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00212-MSS-KRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JOSE LUIS PERALTA, 

a.k.a. Jorge Abreu, 

a.k.a. Jose Abreo, 

a.k.a. Rafael Zarzuela, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(June 11, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 11-15967 Date Filed: 06/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Jose Luis Peralta in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Peralta’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 11-15967 Date Filed: 06/11/2013 Page: 2 of 2
§ 23.4 Investment in personal property. ( a ) *General rule.* A national bank may acquire specific property to be leased only after the bank has entered into: ( 1 ) A conforming lease;
( 2 ) A legally binding written agreement that indemnifies the bank against loss in connection with its acquisition of the property; or
( 3 ) A legally binding written commitment to enter into a conforming lease.
( b ) *Exception.* A national bank may acquire property to be leased without complying with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, if: ( 1 ) The acquisition of the property is consistent with the leasing business then conducted by the bank or is consistent with a business plan for expansion of the bank's existing leasing business or for entry into the leasing business; and
( 2 ) The bank's aggregate investment in property held pursuant to this paragraph (b) does not exceed 15 percent of the bank's capital and surplus.
( c ) *Holding period.* At the expiration of the lease (including any renewals or extensions with the same lessee), or in the event of a default on a lease agreement prior to the expiration of the lease term, a national bank shall either liquidate the off-lease property or re-lease it under a conforming lease as soon as practicable. Liquidation or re-lease must occur not later than five years from the date that the bank acquires the legal right to possession or control of the property, except the OCC may extend the period for up to an additional five years, if the bank provides a clearly convincing demonstration why any additional holding period is necessary. The bank must value off-lease property at the lower of current fair market value or book value promptly after the property becomes off-lease property.
( d ) *Bridge or interim leases.* During the holding period allowed by paragraph (c) of this section, a national bank may enter into a short-term bridge or interim lease pending the liquidation of off-lease property or the re-lease of the property under a conforming lease. A short-term bridge or interim lease must be a net lease, but need not comply with any requirement of subpart B or C of this part.
§ 1211.5 Regulatory Interpretations. ( a ) *Authority.* The General Counsel may, in his or her discretion, issue a Regulatory Interpretation to a regulated entity or the Office of Finance, providing guidance with respect to the application of any applicable statute, rule, regulation, or order to a proposed transaction or activity. The Director reserves the right to modify, rescind, or supersede a Regulatory Interpretation, with such action being effective only on a prospective basis.
( b ) *Requests.* A regulated entity or the Office of Finance may request a Regulatory Interpretation in accordance with § 1211.6.
#### §§ 226.40-226.41 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 76888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30252]

[[Page 76888]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8562]

In the Matter of the Designation of Al-Mulathamun Battalion, Also 
Known as al-Mulathamun Brigade, Also Known as al-Muwaqqi'un bil-Dima, 
Also Known as Those Signed in Blood Battalion, Also Known as 
Signatories in Blood, Also Known as Those who Sign in Blood, Also Known 
as Witnesses in Blood, Also Known as Signed-in-Blood Battalion, Also 
Known as Masked Men Brigade, Also Known as Khaled Abu al-Abbas Brigade, 
Also Known as al-Mulathamun Masked Ones Brigade, Also Known as al-
Murabitoun, Also Known as The Sentinels; as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended.

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as the al-Mulathamun 
Battalion, also known as al-Mulathamun Brigade, also known as al-
Muwaqqi'un bil-Dima, also known as Those Signed in Blood Battalion, 
also known as Signatories in Blood, also known as Those who Sign in 
Blood, also known as Witnesses in Blood, also known as Signed-in-Blood 
Battalion, also known as Masked Men Brigade, also known as Khaled Abu 
al-Abbas Brigade, also known as al-Mulathamun Masked Ones Brigade, also 
known as al-Murabitoun, also known as The Sentinels, committed, or 
poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten 
the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign 
policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 6, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-30252 Filed 12-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Revocation of the Authorization of Belarus General License 2G Due to Human Rights Violations and Abuses

# 									Revocation of the Authorization of Belarus General License 2G Due to Human Rights Violations and Abuses							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 19, 2021

The U.S. Department of State fully supports the Department of the Treasury’s announcement today on the revocation of the Belarus-related General License (GL) and implementation of a 45-day wind down of transactions. This action is a further consequence of the Belarusian authorities’ flagrant disregard for human rights and Belarus’ failure to comply with its obligations under international human rights law.

In 2015, the Department of the Treasury – in consultation with the Department of State – issued the GL authorizing U.S. persons to engage in certain transactions with nine sanctioned Belarusian state-owned enterprises. The GL had been renewed annually through 2020 due to notable progress by Belarusian authorities on human rights, particularly the release of all political prisoners during this time.

However, as a result of government suppression surrounding the fraudulent August 2020 Presidential elections in Belarus and its aftermath, there are more than 340 political prisoners detained in Belarus today. Given the sharply deteriorating human rights situation in Belarus, the U.S. Government determined a further extension would be inconsistent with the Belarus Democracy Act and incompatible with American values. The nine state-owned enterprises affected by this action finance and support the Lukashenka regime, facilitating its violent repression of the Belarusian people and repeated rejection of the rule of law.

Belarus’ regression is exemplified by the detention of political hopefuls like Syarhey Tsikhanouski, courageous activist leaders like Maria Kalesnikava, and independent media experts like Ihar Losik – who are but three among the hundreds of Belarusians unjustly imprisoned by the Lukashenka regime for exercising their human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The United States calls on the Belarusian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release all those unjustly detained or imprisoned. Moreover, we commit to working together with the international community to further promote accountability for those responsible for human rights violations and abuses in Belarus.

Respect for human rights, the rule of law and Belarus’ commitments to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe remain central to improving bilateral relations.

To learn more about the GL 2H, visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20210419.

Tags

BelarusBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
LXR Biotechnology Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92488) on Form S-8 of LXR Biotechnology Inc. of our report dated February
13, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LXR Biotechnology Inc.
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and for the 
period from April 20, 1992 (date of incorporation) through December 31, 1997,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
LXR Biotechnology Inc.

Our report dated February 13, 1998, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result form the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                             /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



San Francisco, California
April 27, 1998
# C_2021484EN.01000601.xml

| 2.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/6

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 December 2021

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 December 2021

(2021/C 484/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1314 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0427 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,443 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 363,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6283 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9467 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,1664 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5849 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4433 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8154 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6548 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5431 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 330,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2065 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5185 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 249,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7745 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,004 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,6246 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,151 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3498 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0869 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7485 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1314

JPY

Japanese yen

128,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85000

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0427

ISK

Iceland króna

146,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,443

HUF

Hungarian forint

363,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6283

RON

Romanian leu

4,9467

TRY

Turkish lira

15,1664

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5849

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4433

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8154

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6548

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5431

KRW

South Korean won

1 330,53

ZAR

South African rand

17,9011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2065

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5185

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 249,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7745

PHP

Philippine peso

57,004

RUB

Russian rouble

83,6246

THB

Thai baht

38,151

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3498

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0869

INR

Indian rupee

84,7485

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1320.13 Council determination regarding systemic importance. ( a ) *Designation determination.* The Council shall designate a financial market utility if the Council determines that the financial market utility is, or is likely to become, systemically important.
( b ) *Rescission determination.* The Council shall rescind a designation of systemic importance for a designated financial market utility if the Council determines that the financial market utility no longer meets the standards for systemic importance.
( c ) *Vote required.* Any determination under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section and any proposed determination under § 1320.12 shall— ( 1 ) Be made by the Council and must not be delegated by the Council; and
( 2 ) Require the vote of not fewer than two-thirds of the members of the Council then serving, including the affirmative vote of the Chairperson of the Council.
( d ) *Consultations.* Before making any determination under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or any proposed determination under § 1320.12, the Council shall consult with the relevant Supervisory Agency and the Board of Governors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Statement of Financial Condition at January 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the 
Statement of Income for the Quarter Ended January 31, 1997 (Unaudited). It 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Oct-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Jan-31-1997
<CASH>                                      20,530
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               66,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                225,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          391,787
<PP&E>                                     204,822
<DEPRECIATION>                             166,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            489,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     257,438
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   280,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            489,121
<SALES>                                    184,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          184,075
<CGS>                                       57,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             114,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            7,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                4,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.00

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of January 9, 2015, is made by and between DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Neil Doyle (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 30, 2012, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of March 8, 2012 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Employment Agreement, the Company and the Executive desire to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

 

1.Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following:

“1.Term. The Company hereby employs the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such employment, for a term commencing on April 1, 2012 and continuing through October 9, 2015, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 or Section 5 (the period during which the Executive is employed hereunder being hereinafter referred to as the “Term”).”

 

2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  The Employment Agreement, together with any Exhibits thereto and this Amendment, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties hereto regarding the employment of the Executive.  

 

3.This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado, without regard to any principles of conflicts of laws which could cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Colorado.

 

4.This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Each counterpart may consist of two copies hereof each signed by one of the parties hereto.  

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 




 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.




	
COMPANY:

	
DCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST INC.

	
By:
	
/s/ Phillip L. Hawkins

	
Name:
	
Philip L. Hawkins

	
Title:
	
President and Chief Executive Officer




 


	
EXECUTIVE:

	
/s/ Neil Doyle

	
Neil Doyle