alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Section 302 Officer Certification

I, Jorge Tagle, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Madeco;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. 	The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-16j5 (e)) for the Company and have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cost such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure control and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. 	The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ Jorge Tagle Ovalle 

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

Time and Date:  November 12, 2009, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.

Place:  This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the 
toll free number and pass code needed to participate in these meetings 
by telephone.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered:  The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Issued on: October 1, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-24303 Filed 10-5-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       78
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,419
<PP&E>                                          53,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,578
<BONDS>                                         14,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,955
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,677
<SALES>                                        172,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,600
<CGS>                                          127,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,556)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,299)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004228EN.01003503.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-474/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 228/77)

By order of 17 May 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-474/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Greece.

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 10.1.2004.

1

---
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Buckeye. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated this 23rd day of  May 2011        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   |
|                                              |   |
| /s/ Steven G. Dean                                |   |
| Steven G. Dean                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

August 10, 1999

Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc.
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77094

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three
and nine month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, as indicated in our report
dated August 10, 1999; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30917 for Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-52795
for Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2829 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2829

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve compensation benefits 
 for veterans in certain cases of impairment of vision involving both 
                                 eyes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2003

 Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Crowley, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. 
 Woolsey, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Owens, Mr. Frost, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. McIntyre, 
 Mr. Wexler, Ms. Lee, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Watson, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Schiff, 
and Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve compensation benefits 
 for veterans in certain cases of impairment of vision involving both 
                                 eyes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dr. James Allen Disabled Veterans 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR VETERANS IN CERTAIN CASES OF 
              IMPAIRMENT OF VISION INVOLVING BOTH EYES.

    Section 1160(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``blindness'' the first place it appears 
        and inserting ``impairment of vision compensable to a degree of 
        10 percent or more''; and
            (2) by strik
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our reports dated February 27, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of OM Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of OM Group, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration
  Statement                      Description                      Filing Date
  ---------                      -----------                      -----------
<S>              <C>                                            <C>
33-74674         OM Group, Inc. Long Term Incentive             January 27, 1995
                 Compensation Plan -- Form S-8 Registration
                 Statement -- 1,015,625 Shares

333-07529        OMG Americas, Inc. Employees' Profit           July 3, 1996
                 Sharing Plan -- Form S-8 Registration
                 Statement -- 250,000 Shares

333-07531        OM Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors'         July 3, 1996
                 Equity Compensation Plan -- Form S-8
                 Registration Statement -- 250,000 Shares

333-47230        OM Group, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive        October 3, 2000
                 Compensation Plan -- Form S-8 Registration
                 Statement -- 2,000,000 Shares

333-65852        OM Group, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive        July 25, 2001
                 Compensation Plan -- Form S-8 Registration
                 Statement -- 2,000,000 Shares
</TABLE>


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 6, 2006
# C_2023246EN.01000601.xml

| 13.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 July 2023

(2023/C 246/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1022 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 153,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85378 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6800 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9683 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,3310 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,828 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 376,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4473 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,8159 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6479 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4574 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6268 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7818 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4751 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 420,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,3368 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9274 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 608,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1263 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,463 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,434 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3477 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7485 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,7173 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1022

JPY

Japanese yen

153,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85378

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6800

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9683

ISK

Iceland króna

146,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,3310

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,828

HUF

Hungarian forint

376,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4473

RON

Romanian leu

4,9495

TRY

Turkish lira

28,8159

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6479

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4574

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6268

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7818

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4751

KRW

South Korean won

1 420,80

ZAR

South African rand

20,3368

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9274

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 608,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1263

PHP

Philippine peso

60,463

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,434

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3477

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7485

INR

Indian rupee

90,7173

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 

* OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner, 

* Misc. Docket AG No. 91 

v. 

* September Term, 2016 

ALEX JONATHAN BROWN

* 

Respondent. 

DEER 

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent 

filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Alex Jonathan 

Brown. The Court, having considered the Petition and the record herein, it is this_ 

day of , 2017, 

ORDERED, that Respondent, Alex Jonathan Brown, be and he is hereby 

REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of 

Professional Conduct. 

Senior Judge 

14597/0/02487ISOADOCXVI

27th

 September

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr.
#### Howard J. M. Cardeza et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Ellen C. Osborn, Impleaded, etc., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,

June, 1900.)

Pleading — An entire defence cannot be stricken out as irrelevant — Code C. P., § 545.

An entire defence cannot be stricken out as irrelevant under section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure, even though it be insufficient; the purpose "of that section being merely to permit irrelevant matter to be stricken out of an otherwise good defence or cause of action.

Motion by the plaintiffs to strike out matter pleaded as a defence as irrelevant.

Edward A. Alexander, for plaintiffs.

William P. Pickett for defendant.

*47Gaynor, J.:

This motion is made under section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure to strike out as “ irrelevant ” matter pleaded as a *“*defence The matter designated constitutes all of the matter so pleaded except a small part of it which if left alone could be to no purpose whatever. Why it is not included in the motion does not appear. The motion must therefore be deemed one to strike out the so-called defence in its entirety. Such a motion cannot be made, even though the matter does not constitute any defence, as seems to be the case here. The Code provision for the striking out of irrelevant matter obviously does not contemplate the striking out of an entire cause of action or of an entire defence for stating insufficient facts to constitute a cause of action or a defence, but only the striking out of irrelevant matter stated in a good cause of action or defence. The remedy is by demurrer (Code Civ. Pro., § 494; Walter v. Fowler, 85 N. Y. 621). It would serve no purpose to refer to the cases apparently to the contrary. Most of them are old, and none of them are authoritative.

Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24251]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-089)]


Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee; meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a public teleconference of the Review of U.S. 
Human Space Flight Plans Committee. The agenda topics for the meeting 
include:
    <bullet> Finalization of the scoring of the Human Space Flight 
options.

DATES: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1 p.m.-2 p.m. (Eastern).
    Teleconference Information:
    Toll-free number: 1-888-373-5705.
    Toll number: 1-719-457-3840.
    Participant Passcode: 190078.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Philip R. McAlister, Office of 
Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone: 202-358-0712.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The teleconference will be open to the 
public up to the limit of the teleconference service (300 people). 
Public callers will be in listen-only mode. It is imperative that the 
meeting be held on this date in order for the Committee's Final Report 
to support the timeframes associated with the Federal budget process. 
For this reason it is not possible to accommodate the full notice 
period.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24251 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
#### § 239.20 Scope.

This subpart applies only to a subsidiary holding company of a mutual holding company.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7008

AFNAN JEROME PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPERINTENDENT PROFFITT; MAJOR FRAZIER; LIEUTENANT ROESSNER; SERGEANT WHALEN; SERGEANT

MCDANIELS; CORPORAL BREEDING; CORPORAL

CRYSTAL; PRIVATE COLT; COUNSELOR JOHNSON;

DOCTOR PASTERNACK; DOCTOR IRVING; SERGEANT

MCCAFFERTY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR

WILDER,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-7009

AFNAN JEROME PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPERINTENDENT PROFFITT; MAJOR FRAZIER; LIEUTENANT ROESSNER; SERGEANT WHALEN; SERGEANT

MCDANIELS; CORPORAL BREEDING; CORPORAL

CRYSTAL; PRIVATE COLT; COUNSELOR JOHNSON;

DOCTOR PASTERNACK; DOCTOR IRVING; SERGEANT

MCCAFFERTY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR

WILDER,

Defendants - Appellees.
2
3

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-815-R)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Afnan Jerome Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Loftis, WOODS,

ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
4

PER CURIAM:

Afnan Jerome Parker appeals from the district court's orders

(1) adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing

all of the claims in his complaint except the Eighth Amendment

claim, (2) entering judgment on the jury verdict against Parker on

his Eighth Amendment claim, (3) denying his motion for preparation

of transcripts at government expense, and (4) refusing, for lack of

jurisdiction, to act on Parker's motion to amend or for a new trial

and motion to produce transcripts and court documents. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees' motion to

dismiss for failure to prosecute, deny Parker's motions for appointment of counsel and for a new trial, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Proffitt, No. CA-94-815-R

(W.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1996, and May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED