alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   331
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               60
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3708
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23852
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              23852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    91.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    91.92
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 220
Editorial Note: A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

§ 220.108 International Bank Securities. ( a ) Section 2 of the Act of June 29, 1949 (Pub. L. 142—81st Congress), amended the Bretton Woods Agreements Act by adding a new section numbered 15 providing, in part, that— Any securities issued by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (including any guaranty by the bank, whether or not limited in scope), and any securities guaranteed by the bank as to both principal and interest, shall be deemed to be exempted securities within the meaning of * * * paragraph (a)(12) of section 3 of the [Securities Exchange] Act of June 6, 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78c). * * *.
( b ) In response to inquiries with respect to the applicability of the margin requirements of this part to securities issued or guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Board has replied that, as a result of this enactment, securities issued by the Bank are now classified as exempted securities under § 220.2(e). Such securities are now in the same category under this part as are United States Government, State and municipal bonds. Accordingly, the specific percentage limitations prescribed by this part with respect to maximum loan value and margin requirements are no longer applicable thereto.
[14 FR 5505, Sept. 7, 1949]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at March 31, 2000 and the Statements of Income and Comprehensive for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,772
<SECURITIES>                                   313,834
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,837
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   323,443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,233
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,992
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, James T. Taylor, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Thomas Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.  Date: March 30, 2006 /s/
  JAMES T. TAYLORJames
  T. TaylorChief
  Executive Officer, President,and
  Secretary
#### James La Rue *against*John Boughaner, and others.

on certiorari.

*SAXTON*for plaintiff

Insufficient demand. (b)

Interested witness.

(b)

*Everit vs. Keen, post 203. Williams vs. Hamilton, post 220. Rice vs. Oxsenius, Pen. *661. Haggerty vs. Vankirk, 4 Hal. 118. Farley vs. McIntire, 1 Gr. 190. Howell vs. Burnett, Spen. 366. Pinkney vs. Ayers, 1 Zab. 694. Keep vs. Kelly, 3 Vr. 56.*

Opinion of the court.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

The first objection to this judg*116ment, is, that the state of demand is uncertain and When it comes to be inspected, it appears, among other things, to contain those items, viz.

*May*2, 1795. To 1 note against *John Barcroft,*$22 67

*August*3,1813. To cash lent by *Asher Williamson,*for *Mary Hull,*. . . . 120 72

Those two charges are so evidently vague and uncertain, that it would be impossible for a man to answer with safety. The first, as it stands, is wholly unintelligible, and the second not much better.

After summing up and footing the whole amount at ..... $219 05 he gives this credit, viz. By cash and sundries at sundry days and times, and for interest, , .-. ■ . . . . 119 05

Leaving a balance of exactly the sum cogniza-.-ble before a justice, viz.....$100 00

Now if the charge be bad, the credit is still worse, and more embarrassing; for how can the party see for what he is credited. If a plaintiff will give credit and strike a balance, he must do it fairly and according tc the truth, shewing the particulars with their dates as they are in the account.

^Besides all this, on the trial of the cause, the plaintiff offered, and the justice admitted as witnesses (though they were objected to bj^ the defendants) *Jacob Boughaner*and *Martha*his wife, which said *Martha*was the daughter, and one of the residuary legatees of the said *Mary Hull,*the testator, and which *residuum*the demand in question, if recovered, must go to increase. This is a direct interest. And for both these reasons,

The judgment must be reversed.
§ 268.405 Decisions on appeals. ( a ) The Office of Federal Operations, on behalf of the Commission, shall issue a written decision setting forth its reasons for the decision. The Commission shall dismiss appeals in accordance with §§ 268.106, 268.403(c) and 268.408. The decision shall be based on the preponderance of the evidence. The decision on an appeal from the Board's final action shall be based on a de novo review, except that the review of the factual findings in a decision by an administrative judge issued pursuant to § 268.108(i) shall be based on a substantial evidence standard of review. If the decision contains a finding of discrimination, appropriate remedy(ies) shall be included and, where appropriate, the entitlement to interest, attorney's fees or costs shall be indicated. The decision shall reflect the date of its issuance, inform the complainant of his or her civil action rights, and be transmitted to the complainant and the Board by first class mail.
( b ) The Office of Federal Operations, on behalf of the Commission, shall issue decisions on appeals of decisions to accept or dismiss a class complaint issued pursuant to § 268.204(d)(7) within 90 days of receipt of the appeal.
( c ) A decision issued under paragraph (a) of this section is final within the meaning of § 268.406 unless the Board issues a final decision under paragraph (d) of this section or unless a timely request for reconsideration is filed by a party to the case. A party may request reconsideration within 30 days of receipt of a decision of the Commission, which the Commission in its discretion may grant, if the party demonstrates that: ( 1 ) The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
( 2 ) The decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Board.
( d ) The Board, within 30 days of receiving a decision of the Commission, may issue a final decision based upon that decision, which shall be final within the meaning of § 268.406.
[84 FR 27034, June 11, 2019]
#### § 1081.106 Deadlines.

The deadlines for action by the hearing officer established by §§ 1081.203, 1081.205, 1081.211, 1081.212, and 1081.400, or elsewhere in this part, confer no substantive rights on respondents.
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

§ 249.108 Funding related to Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding. ( a ) *Treatment of Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding.* Notwithstanding any other section of this part and except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, available stable funding amounts and required stable funding amounts related to Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding and the assets securing Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding are excluded from the calculation of a Board-regulated institution's net stable funding ratio calculated under § 249.100(b).
( b ) *Exception.* To the extent the Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding is secured by securities, debt obligations, or other instruments issued by the Board-regulated institution or one of its consolidated subsidiaries, the Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding and assets securing the Covered Federal Reserve Facility Funding are not subject to paragraph (a) of this section and the available stable funding amount and required stable funding amount must be included in the Board-regulated institution's net stable funding ratio calculated under § 249.100(b).
| SUBSIDIARY                           | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Buckeye Florida Corporation          | Delaware                      |
| BFC 2 Inc.                           | Florida                       |
| BFC 3 LLC                            | Delaware                      |
| BFOL 2 Inc.                          | Florida                       |
| BFOL 3 LLC                           | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye Florida, Limited Partnership | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye S. A.                        | Switzerland                   |
| Buckeye Lumberton Inc.               | North Carolina                |
| Buckeye Mt. Holly LLC                | Delaware                      |
| Merfin Systems LLC                   | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye Canada Co.                   | Canada                        |
| Buckeye Nova Scotia Co.              | Canada                        |
| Buckeye Canada                       | Canada                        |
| BKI International Inc.               | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye France SARL                  | France                        |
| Buckeye Italia S.r.l.                | Italy                         |
| Buckeye Holding GmbH                 | Germany                       |
| Buckeye Technologies GmbH            | Germany                       |
| Buckeye Steinfurt GmbH               | Germany                       |
| BKI South America LLC                | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye Americana Ltda.              | Brazil                        |
| Buckeye Technologies Canada Inc.     | Delaware                      |
| Buckeye Building Fibers LLC          | Delaware                      |
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–626

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4475, TRANSPORTATION

AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001

MAY 18, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 505]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 505, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4475,

Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations for the Fiscal

Year ending September 30, 2001, under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the

bill. The rule provides that the amendments printed in this report

shall be considered as adopted. The rule waives clause 2 of rule

XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) against provisions in the bill, as amended, except as

otherwise specified in the rule.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may

postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and reduce voting

time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a

fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

2

SUMMARY OF SELF-EXECUTED AMENDMENTS

The amendments correct the amount of funds to be derived from

the Airport and Aviation Trust Fund, strike an incorrectly titled

paragraph, and insert the short title of the bill.

TEXT OF SELF-EXECUTED AMENDMENTS

Page 11, line 4, strike ‘‘$4,403,869,000’’ and insert

‘‘$4,414,869,000’’.

Page 19, line 6, strike ‘‘(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)’’.

Page 54, after line 2, insert the following:

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Transportation and

Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 PROLOGIS
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings from continuing operations
    
    $
    717,690
    
    
    $
    306,203
    
    
    $
    220,470
    
    
    $
    236,701
    
    
    $
    235,157Add:Minority Interest
    
    
    3,457
    
    
    
    5,243
    
    
    
    4,875
    
    
    
    4,959
    
    
    
    5,508Income Taxes
    
    
    30,528
    
    
    
    26,892
    
    
    
    43,562
    
    
    
    15,374
    
    
    
    28,169Interest expense
    
    
    294,403
    
    
    
    177,562
    
    
    
    152,551
    
    
    
    154,427
    
    
    
    151,864Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    1,046,078
    
    
    $
    515,900
    
    
    $
    421,458
    
    
    $
    411,461
    
    
    $
    420,698Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    294,403
    
    
    $
    177,562
    
    
    $
    152,551
    
    
    $
    154,427
    
    
    $
    151,864Capitalized interest
    
    
    97,297
    
    
    
    63,885
    
    
    
    37,388
    
    
    
    36,425
    
    
    
    30,534Total fixed charges
    
    $
    391,700
    
    
    $
    241,447
    
    
    $
    189,939
    
    
    $
    190,852
    
    
    $
    182,398Ratio of earnings as adjusted to fixed charges
    
    
    2.7
    
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    2.2
    
    
    
    2.2
    
    
    
    2.3
§ 1282.20 Determination of compliance with housing goals; notice of determination. ( a ) *Single-family housing goals.* The Director shall evaluate each Enterprise's performance under the low-income families housing goal, the very low-income families housing goal, the low-income areas housing goal, the low-income areas housing subgoal, and the refinancing mortgages housing goal on an annual basis. If the Director determines that an Enterprise has failed, or there is a substantial probability that an Enterprise will fail, to meet a single-family housing goal established by this subpart, the Director shall notify the Enterprise in writing of such preliminary determination.
( b ) *Multifamily housing goal and subgoals.* The Director shall evaluate each Enterprise's performance under the multifamily low-income housing goal, the multifamily very low-income housing subgoal, and the small multifamily low-income housing subgoal, on an annual basis. If the Director determines that an Enterprise has failed, or there is a substantial probability that an Enterprise will fail, to meet a multifamily housing goal or subgoal established by this subpart, the Director shall notify the Enterprise in writing of such preliminary determination.
( c ) Any notification to an Enterprise of a preliminary determination under this section shall provide the Enterprise with an opportunity to respond in writing in accordance with the procedures at 12 U.S.C. 4566(b).
[75 FR 55930, Sept. 14, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 53433, Sept. 3, 2015]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-1122.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Signed at Washington November 22, 2005 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Weapons: Proliferation 

 Agreement signed at Washington November 22, 2005; 

 Entered into force November 22, 2005. 




NOTE: Done at Washington.




NOTE: Done at Washington on November 22, 2005.




NOTE: Done at Washington on November 22, 2005.




NOTE: Done at Washington on November 22, 2005.