alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****MedTEAM [kit]: evidence-basedpractices kit**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.427:M 46/2/KIT

Item Number:0497-D-40
CGP systemNumber:000872277
 
Howto use the evidence-based practice kits
Gettingstarted with evidence-based practices
Building your program
Training front line staff
Evaluating your program
Theevidence.
PowerPointPresentation
Brochures: English| Espanol
MedTEAM � Introductory Video(YouTube)
 
April 14, 2020
#### Edward C. Amer et al., Respondents, *v.*John Folk et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment, rendered at Trial Term.

Hastings & Gleason (George S. Hastings, of counsel), for appellants.

Blumenstiel & Hirsch (Morris J. Hirsch, of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The only question in this case was whether there had been an accord and satisfaction between the parties. This issue was submitted to the jury by a charge which correctly followed the opinion delivered when this case was here on a former appeal. Amer v. Folk, 28 Misc. Rep. 508. The evidence was conflicting and amply supported the judgment rendered against the defendants.

The order denying the defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict is not appealable to this court.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-11962

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

District No. 1:12-cv-00500-TWT

RICKY J. SAMPSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KASIM REED, in his official capacity as 

Mayor of the City of Atlanta, et al.,

Defendants,

ROBERT C. GODWIN, individually,

REGINALD PETTIS, individually,

Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(October 2, 2013)

Before WILSON, HILL, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-11962 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Godwin and Reginald Pettis appeal the denial of their motions for 

summary judgment in this Section 1983 action against them by plaintiff, Ricky 

Sampson. The district court, in a well-reasoned and thorough opinion, denied 

summary judgment as to the officers’ affirmative defenses of qualified immunity 

and official immunity. The district court also found that Sampson had presented 

sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to his claims of 

false imprisonment and abuse in being arrested. Finally, the district court held that 

there was sufficient evidence to support Sampson’s battery claim against Officer 

Pettis, but not against Officer Godwin, whom the undisputed evidence showed did 

not touch Sampson. Sampson does not appeal the grant of summary judgment to 

Officer Godwin on this claim.

We have reviewed the record in this case and the district court’s thoughtful 

opinion. Finding no reversible error, we shall affirm.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Case: 13-11962 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2023204EN.01002801.xml

| 12.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/28

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 204/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by San Marino

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: San Marino

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the death of Luca Signorelli

Description of the design: The design shows an angel in the centre, a detail from the painting ‘Il Paradiso’ by Luca Signorelli, preserved in the Chapel of San Brizio in the Cathedral of Orvieto. At the left-hand side is the letter R, identifying the Mint of Rome. In semi-circle at the bottom left is the word ‘SIGNORELLI’. At the right-hand side is the name of the issuing country ‘SAN MARINO’, and at the top the years ‘1523 2023’. In the lower centre are the initials of the author Marta Bonifacio, MB.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 56 000

Estimated date of issue: September 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### § 19.102 Civil money penalties.

A respondent must pay civil money penalties assessed pursuant to subpart A of this part within 60 days after the issuance of the notice of assessment unless the OCC requires a different time for payment. A respondent that has made a timely request for a hearing to challenge the assessment of the penalty is not required to pay the penalty until the OCC has issued a final order of assessment. In these instances, the respondent must pay the penalty within 60 days of service of the order unless the OCC requires a different time for payment.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00487
- CR

Corey Chandler, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 18
- 904055 , THE HONORABLE P. D AVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivol ous and without merit. See Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and fil e a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for
pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record w ith this Court. Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide2

written verification to this Court of the date and manner in w hich the appellate record was provided, on or before April 20, 2020

. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on April 10, 2020

.

Before Justices Goodwin , Kelly, and Smith Do Not Publish
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SETO Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Eugene J. Pian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2003

|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/  Eugene J. Pian
Eugene J. Pian
President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this quarterly report on form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

27
# C_2022327EN.01000401.xml

| 30.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 August 2022

(2022/C 327/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9986 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4379 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85420 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6280 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9670 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7675 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,592 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 409,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7450 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8699 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,1605 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4529 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3026 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,8368 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6305 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3950 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 347,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8891 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9044 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5119 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 871,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4837 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,187 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,399 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0663 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9876 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8295 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9986

JPY

Japanese yen

138,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4379

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85420

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6280

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9670

ISK

Iceland króna

141,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7675

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,592

HUF

Hungarian forint

409,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7450

RON

Romanian leu

4,8699

TRY

Turkish lira

18,1605

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4529

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3026

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,8368

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6305

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3950

KRW

South Korean won

1 347,47

ZAR

South African rand

16,8891

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9044

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5119

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 871,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4837

PHP

Philippine peso

56,187

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,399

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0663

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9876

INR

Indian rupee

79,8295

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Ex. 10.241 Endo RRA Counterpart re 2019 Notes March 20 2015


Exhibit 10.241




Counterpart to Registration Rights Agreement
March 20, 2015
Each of the undersigned hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably agrees as a Guarantor, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2014 by and among Endo Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Endo Finco Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Guarantors party thereto, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., relating to the 7.00% Senior Notes due 2019, to be bound by the terms and provisions of such Registration Rights Agreement.







Exhibit 10.241




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of the date first written above.






	
		
	APHRODITE WOMEN’S HEALTH, LLC

	as a Guaranteeing Subsidiary

	 
	 

	By:
	AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS

	 
	HOLDINGS, INC., its manager




	
		
	By:
	/s/ Deanna Voss

	Name:
	 Deanna Voss 

	Title:
	 Assistant Secretary






	
		
	ENDO VENTURES CYPRUS LIMITED

	as a Guaranteeing Subsidiary




	
		
	By:
	/s/ Orla Dunlea

	Name:
	Orla Dunlea

	Title:
	Director









[Signature to Registration Rights Agreement Counterpart - 7.00% Senior Notes due 2019]
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ John A. KraeutlerJohn A. KraeutlerChief Executive OfficerAugust 7, 2009/s/ Melissa LuekeMelissa LuekeVice President andChief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2009
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0486**
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

JAN 1 3 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter ofNortheastem Aviation Corp., Respondent 

Docket Nos. FAA-2012-1264 

Case Nos. 2012EA110030 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan 

AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

COMES NOW the Agency, by and through its designated representative, the 

Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region and his duly designated agents, and 

withdraws its Complaint in this matter, in accordance with 14 CFR Section 13.215. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Zachary 

Attorney 

Me~ 

~ 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL:718 553-3258 

FAX: 718 995-5699 

Date: January 7, 2013 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT has 

been sent via first class mail and facsimile to the following: 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz, Esq. 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 12th Floor 

Washington, DC 20006-

F AX 202-659-6699 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT has 

been sent via first class mail to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy via first class mail) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Date: j,fi,N ~ 7 2014 ~A~ ~s Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Buckeye. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated this 29th day of August 2011                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                           |   |
|                                                           |   |
| /s/ John B. Crowe                                              |   |
| John B. CroweChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
§ 221.117 When bank in “good faith” has not relied on stock as collateral. ( a ) The Board has received questions regarding the circumstances in which an extension or maintenance of credit will not be deemed to be “indirectly secured” by stock as indicated by the phrase, “if the lender, in good faith, has not relied upon the margin stock as collateral,” contained in paragraph (2)(iv) of the definition of *indirectly secured* in § 221.2.
( b ) In response, the Board noted that in amending this portion of the regulation in 1968 it was indicated that one of the purposes of the change was to make clear that the definition of *indirectly secured* does not apply to certain routine negative covenants in loan agreements. Also, while the question of whether or not a bank has relied upon particular stock as collateral is necessarily a question of fact to be determined in each case in the light of all relevant circumstances, some indication that the bank had not relied upon stock as collateral would seem to be afforded by such circumstances as the fact that: ( 1 ) The bank had obtained a reasonably current financial statement of the borrower and this statement could reasonably support the loan; and
( 2 ) The loan was not payable on demand or because of fluctuations in market value of the stock, but instead was payable on one or more fixed maturities which were typical of maturities applied by the bank to loans otherwise similar except for not involving any possible question of stock collateral.
December 5, 2014

Superintendent

«NAME00»

«MSTREE00»

«MCITY00», «MSTATE00» «MZIP00»-«MZIP400»

Dear Superintendent:

Your district has been selected to participate in the U.S. Department of Education’s study

on the use of funds under the ESEA Title II, Part A “Improving Teacher Quality State 

Grants – Subgrants to LEAs” program for 2014-15. The data collected in this study will 

provide the Department with information needed for the annual budget deliberations in 

Congress and will also be used to report on the Department’s Title II, Part A Program 

performance indicators, as required by the Government Performance and Results Act.

Your participation is essential in ensuring that we are able to produce valid and reliable 

findings. Please complete and return your data collection instrument by February 13, 

2015, either through an online submission or by using the enclosed postage-paid 

envelope. 

If your district did not receive funding under the Title II, Part A program for 2014-15, 

please indicate this by checking the appropriate box on the first page of the data 

collection instrument.

If you have any questions as you complete the survey, please call Shen Lee at Westat's toll 

free number -- (800) 937-8281, extension 3576. You can also e-mail him at 

shenlee@westat.com. He will provide you with any assistance you may need. 

We appreciate your taking the time to complete and submit this data collection 

instrument, and we thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

 

Daphne Kaplan 

Team Leader, Titel II, Part A Program

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT AND TEACHER QUALITY PROGRAMS

WWW.ED.GOV

400 MARYLAND AVE, SW, WASHINGTON, DC 20202-6200

Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation.
§ 78.70 Suicide prevention services: Peer support services. ( a ) Grantees providing or coordinating the provision of peer support services must provide or coordinate the provision of peer support services to help participants understand what resources and supports are available in their area for suicide prevention. Peer support services must be provided by veterans trained in peer support with similar lived experiences related to suicide or mental health. Peer support specialists serve as role models and a resource to assist participants with their mental health recovery.
( b ) Each grantee providing or coordinating the provision of peer support services must ensure that veterans providing such services to participants meet the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 7402(b)(13) and meet qualification standards for appointment; or have completed peer support training, are pursuing credentials to meet the minimum qualification standards for appointment, and are under the supervision of an individual who meets the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 7402(b)(13). Grant funds may be used to provide education and training for employees of the grantee or the community partner who provide peer support services consistent with the terms set forth in the grant agreement.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Tiberio Dall'Olio, the Chief Executive Officer of Madeco S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 

1.	the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: June 29, 2006

 

/s/ Tiberio Dall'Olio

Tiberio Dall'Olio

Chief Executive Officer