alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Financial Data Sheet for NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000793730
<NAME>                        NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>              1
<CASH>                       6,192,519
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                39,003,254
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             0
<PP&E>                       24,497,209
<DEPRECIATION>               (5,642,524)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               65,305,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        0
<BONDS>                      42,672,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  0
<COMMON>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                   (4,941,275)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 65,305,456
<SALES>                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             21,654,503
<CGS>                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                9,312,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             469,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           4,748,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>              7,124,311
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          0
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 7,124,311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                0
        



</TABLE>
§ 1263.20 Stock purchase. ( a ) *Minimum purchase requirement.* An institution that has been approved for membership in a Bank as provided in this part shall become a member of that Bank upon purchasing the amount of stock required under the membership stock purchase provisions of that Bank's capital structure plan. If an institution fails to purchase the minimum amount of stock required for membership within 60 calendar days after the date on which it is approved for membership, the membership approval shall become void and that institution may not become a member of that Bank until after it has filed a new application and the Bank has approved that application pursuant to the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Issuance of stock.* After approving an institution for membership, and in return for payment in full of the par value, a Bank shall issue to that institution the amount of capital stock required to be purchased under the Bank's capital structure plan.
( c ) *Reports.* Each Bank shall report to FHFA information regarding the minimum investment in Bank capital stock made by each new member referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, in accordance with the instructions provided in the Data Reporting Manual.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Buckeye Technologies Inc. of our reports dated August 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Buckeye Technologies Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Buckeye Technologies
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2009:





* Form S-8 No. 333-151724 pertaining to the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan


* Form S-8 No. 333-61373 pertaining to the Restricted Stock Plan


* Form S-8 No. 333-61371 pertaining to the Merfin Systems 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan


* Form S-8 No. 333-18559 pertaining to the 1995 Management Stock Option Plan of Buckeye Cellulose Corporation


* Form S-8 No. 333-18561 pertaining to the Buckeye Cellulose Corporation Formula Plan for Non-Employee Directors


* Form S-8 No. 333-18573 pertaining to the 1995 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Management Employees of Buckeye Cellulose Corporation








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Memphis, Tennessee


August 27, 2009
12 

C o l v i l l e 

I k p i k p u k 

R i v e r 

R i v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

H a r r i s o n 

B

a y 

Pitt Point 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

Fish C eek 

Tingmiaksiqvik River 

Kikiakr

ro

ak 

River 

Kogosukruk

River 

Judy Creek 

Migu akiak R. 

1 W 1 E 

9 

2 

11 

8 

9 N 

r

High

A R C T I C O C E A N

Cape Simpson 

Sm it h Bay 

15 N 

3 2 1 W 11 10 8 7 6 5 4

Teshekpuk Lake 14

13

12

10

3 4 2

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

7

6

5

4

3

2

1 N 

2 3 4 1 W 1 E 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

1 S 

YELLOW-BILLED LOON 2

) Offshore D

(Number o

istribution (2000)

f Individuals)

Onshore Density (1992 - 2005

(Birds per Square Kilometer) 3

1 to 3

Medium High 4

Medium 

Low 5

None Observed 

0 6 12

Miles 6

Source: Onshore Density Data and Offshore Data: USFWS Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK

Map 3-10. Onshore Density and Offshore Beaufort Sea Distribution of Yellow-billed Loons in the Northeast National

Petroleum Reserve-Alaska 

5 

5
42586.

#### HERRINGTON v. LEATHERS et al.

*Frankum, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.*

Argued February 8, 1967

Decided February 23, 1967.

*Johnson & Hayes, Herbert Johnson,*for appellant.

*Hatcher, Meyerson, Oxford & Irvin, Henry M. Hatcher, Jr., Edward D. Wheeler, William G. Grant, Joe Salem,*for appellees.

Debn, Judge.

The notice of appeal in this case was filed in the trial court on April 7, 1966, and amended October 6 and again October 19. A transcript of the evidence, necessary for consideration of the errors enumerated, was first designated for transmittal in the October 19 amendment, but was not in fact filed until December 13, 1966. This appellant neither applied for nor was granted an extension of time for the filing of the transcript. Regardless, therefore, of which date is accepted as the beginning point for the 30-day period for filing the reporter’s transcript, it is obvious that it was not timely filed. *Code Ann.*§ 6-806. Failure to do so, coupled with failure to obtain an extension of time as provided by *Code Ann.*§ 6-804 must result in dismissal. *Davis v. Davis,*222 Ga. 579 (151 SE2d 123).

*Appeal dismissed.*
HomeDSS Press Releases...Resident of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Pleads Guilty to Making False Statements on VISA Applications

# 									Resident of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Pleads Guilty to Making False Statements on VISA Applications							

DSS Releases

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

June 26, 2017

**CONCORD, N.H. –**Anna Delarosa, 57, of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania pleaded guilty to making false statements in applications for family visas, announced Acting United States Attorney John J. Farley.

According to court documents, a limited number of family visas are issued by the United States State Department to citizens of foreign countries. To obtain a family visa, a citizen or legal permanent resident of the United States (a “sponsor”) is required to submit an application for a family visa to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. A citizen of a foreign country is not eligible for a family visa if he or she is likely to become a public charge after they enter the United States. Therefore, under federal law, a sponsor is also required demonstrate his or her ability to provide financial support to the applicant by submitting a financial affidavit, copies of their recent federal tax returns, and other personal financial records to the USCIS. All applications for family visas are processed at the National Passport Center in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

Read More 

Tags

DSS ReleasesNew Hampshire

Back to Top
Order entered September 8 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00851 - CV MERRITT, HAWKINS & A SSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant V. CHRIS CAPORICCI AND MATTHEW CUMMINS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 13851



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart W e GRANT appellant’s petition for permission to appeal interlocutory order on choice

of

- law

. Appellant’s notice of appe al is deemed to have been filed as of the date of this order, and the appeal will proceed in accordance with the rules governing accelerated appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.3(k). We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre and Official Court Repo rter Vielica Dobbins to file the clerk’s and reporter’s records, respectively, no later than September 14, 2015. See id. 35.1(b).We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Dale

B. Tillery, Judge of the 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas; Ms. Pitre; Ms. Dobbins ; and all counsel of record.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHI NGTON , D.C

. 20460

MEMORANDUM DATE: May 5, 2011 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY ANO POLLUTION PREVENTION

FROM: 

### Joan Harrigan-Farrelly
. Director 

# , IL
....._ -- -Jl.l"v'.$/ 

### SUBJECT: Triclosan case study docket: Draft Residential Exposure & 

### Illustrative Risk Assessment. 

# r

Antimicrobials Division (751 OP)

# ~ TO: Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. Designated Federal Official FIFRA SAP Office ofScience Coordination and Policy (720IM) Attached is a document titled, 

### Triclosan: Draft Residential Exposure & 

### Illustrative Risk Assessment. Although this document is not 

### part ofthe SAP case study
. it has been disseminated 

### to the SAP 

### and to the general public to illustrate how the toxicity endpoints 

### in the triclosan SAP 

### case study may be used in a regulatory risk context. The development ofthis document also provides the general public with the recently released triclosan National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) general population biological monitoring data for survey years 2005-2006 and 2007-2008. The EPA' s Registration Review oftriclosan is scheduled to begin in 2013. This Registration Review will consider all pertinent information published on the ecological and human effects of triclosan published since the 2008 Registration Eligibility Decision (RED) document. This evaluation will include, but not be limited to, the thyroid effects as well as the SAP' s comments on the triclosan case study.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 4, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00157-CR

IN RE LEON HARRISON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 635921

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 26, 2013, relator Leon Harrison filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel Chris Daniel, the Harris 

County District Clerk, to forward his notice of appeal and “all related documents” 

in the underlying action to this court. Because the District Clerk has now 

forwarded relator’s notice of appeal, we dismiss this proceeding as moot.
2

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the 

Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus 

jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or 

county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to 

enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. We 

ordinarily do not have mandamus jurisdiction over a District Clerk. However, we 

have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief when a district clerk fails to forward a 

notice of appeal to the court of appeals because issuance of the writ is necessary to 

enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Smith, 

263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding).

The trial court clerk has a mandatory ministerial duty to forward a notice of 

appeal to the court of appeals. Whitsitt v. Ramsay, 719 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1986) (orig. proceeding). On March 21, 2013, the Harris County 

District Clerk forwarded relator’s notice of appeal to this court, which docketed his 

appeal as cause number 14-13-00239-CR. Because the District Clerk has complied 

with his ministerial duty to forward the notice of appeal to the court of appeals, we 

dismiss this proceeding as moot. As to any additional relief requested, we dismiss 

for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
# C_2023160EN.01001401.xml

| 5.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 May 2023

(2023/C 160/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1074 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4503 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88015 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3410 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9802 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,8282 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,460 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 373,94 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9295 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,5825 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6585 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5072 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6909 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7668 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4695 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 465,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1357 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6538 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 263,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9313 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,286 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,430 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5194 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8208 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,5495 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1074

JPY

Japanese yen

148,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4503

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88015

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3410

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9802

ISK

Iceland króna

150,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,8282

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,460

HUF

Hungarian forint

373,94

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5905

RON

Romanian leu

4,9295

TRY

Turkish lira

21,5825

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6585

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5072

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6909

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7668

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4695

KRW

South Korean won

1 465,69

ZAR

South African rand

20,1357

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6538

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 263,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9313

PHP

Philippine peso

61,286

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,430

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5194

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8208

INR

Indian rupee

90,5495

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Benson,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

**Dated:  May 9, 2006**
|        |   | By:    |   | /s/ THOMAS  P. BENSON                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Thomas P. Benson                                                                                 |
|   |   |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President  and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2012376EN.01000601.xml

| 6.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 376/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 4 July 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 71061 |
| Decision number | : | 262/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Amendments to the support scheme relating to temporary reimbursement in respect of film making |
| Legal basis | : | Act No 158/2011 amending Act No 43/1999 on temporary reimbursements in respect of film making |
| Objective | : | Culture |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Duration | : | Until 31 December 2016 |
| Economic sectors | : | Audiovisual production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 150 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

4 July 2012

Case number

:

71061

Decision number

:

262/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Amendments to the support scheme relating to temporary reimbursement in respect of film making

Legal basis

:

Act No 158/2011 amending Act No 43/1999 on temporary reimbursements in respect of film making

Objective

:

Culture

Form of aid

:

Grant

Duration

:

Until 31 December 2016

Economic sectors

:

Audiovisual production

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism

Arnarhvoli

150 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2022206EN.01001701.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 May 2022

(2022/C 206/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0577 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84820 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4915 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0280 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,670 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 382,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6365 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9477 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,8201 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4980 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3526 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2999 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6518 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4588 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 340,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7131 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0638 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5335 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 501,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6422 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,181 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,284 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1989 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0314 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,1617 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0577

JPY

Japanese yen

135,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84820

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4915

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0280

ISK

Iceland króna

138,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,670

HUF

Hungarian forint

382,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6365

RON

Romanian leu

4,9477

TRY

Turkish lira

16,8201

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4980

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3526

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2999

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6518

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4588

KRW

South Korean won

1 340,58

ZAR

South African rand

16,7131

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0638

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5335

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 501,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6422

PHP

Philippine peso

55,181

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,284

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1989

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0314

INR

Indian rupee

82,1617

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
AFS-11-250-E 

April 22, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10178A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1012 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut 

Christianstead, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10178. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 31, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10178. That exemption from § 121.305(j) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to conduct domestic, flag, 

and supplemental operations in the islands of the Caribbean without installing a third 

gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10178 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10178 to November 30, 2011 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
#### § 150.50 What is a fiduciary account?

A fiduciary account is an account that you administer acting in a fiduciary capacity.