alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JerryC. Atkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Jerry C. Atkin      |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |   |
| Jerry  C. Atkin          |   |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |   |
| November 6,  2009   |   |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00358

- CV

Juanita SPRUTE , M.D. and Jefferson Family Practice Associates,

Appellants

v.

Arnold L. LEVEY

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 02406

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s and Cross

- Appellee ’ s Second Motion for Ext ension of Time to File

Briefs is granted. The briefs are due on April 2, 2015. No further extensions.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

<PAGE>   2


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                           D.I.Y. HOME WAREHOUSE, INC.


                                    FORM 10-K
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended                  Fiscal Year Ended
                                       December 28,      December 30,      December 28,     December 30,
                                          1996             1995(1)            1996             1995(1)
                                       ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
                                               (Unaudited)
                                               -----------
<S>                                    <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>       
Income applicable to common shares     $  676,831        $   22,930        $3,785,186        $3,109,843
                                       ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

Weighted average common shares
   outstanding for the period           7,630,685         7,625,000         7,626,702         7,625,000
Dilutive effect of exercise of stock
   options                                      -                 -                 -                 -
                                       ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------

Weighted average common shares,
   assuming issuance of the above
   securities                           7,630,685         7,625,000         7,626,702         7,625,000
                                       ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

Earnings per common share:

          Primary                      $     0.09        $     0.00        $     0.50        $     0.41

          Fully diluted                $      .09        $      .00        $      .50        $      .41


<FN>
(1)      Effective December 31, 1995, the Company changed its method of
         accounting for merchandise inventories from the last in, first out
         (LIFO) method to the first in, first out (FIFO) method. As required by
         generally accepted accounting principles, the Company has retroactively
         adjusted prior years' financial statements for this change.
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11874 and #11875]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of disaster for the State of California dated 09/09/2009.

*Incident:*                         49 Fire.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/30/2009 through 09/04/2009.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         10/02/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/09/2009.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/09/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Administrator's disaster declaration in the State of California, dated 09/09/2009, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 08/30/2009 and continuing through 09/04/2009.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Dated: October 2, 2009.

Karen G. Mills,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. E9-24414 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32

# SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the quarterly report of City Capital Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                                                                                    
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 21, 2007 | /s/ Ephren Taylor
Ephren Taylor
Principal Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
From: McKaughan, Colleen

Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:30:31 PM To: vmartz@srmaterials.com ; Gary.Bohnee@SRPMIC

- nsn.gov Cc: Nudd, Gregory; Webb, Thomas; Kelly, Shaheerah; ecm@azdeq.gov Subject: New Court

- Ordered Deadline for Regional Haze FIP

Dear Verle and Gary,

I’m writing to let you know that the court

- ordered deadline for EPA to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) addressing regional haze in Arizona has been extended to September 6, 2013. Our deadline for final action on Arizona’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) remains July 15, 2013. The deadline for commenting on our December 20, 2012 proposed action on Arizona’s SIP is March 6, 2013.

If EPA finalizes disapproval of any aspect of the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, we are obligated to propose and later finalize a FIP to address these disapproved portions. The deadlines for these proposed and final actions are set in a consent decree. The parties to the consent decree recently agreed to extend these deadlines and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting a motion to amend the consent decree to reflect these new deadlines. The new deadlines of September 6, 2013 for the proposed action and February 6, 2014 for the final action provide the agency more time for the technical work that will form the basis of the FIP.

If you are pl anning to provide technical information that you think would be helpful to EPA in preparing our FIP proposal, please provide that information no later than May 10, 2013 . This will allow us enough time to review and consider the information in preparing the proposal.

In the case of Kiln 4 at the Phoenix Cement Company in Clarksdale, Arizona, we are particularly interested in getting your feedback regarding the effectiveness of potential controls and the control costs estimated by our contractor, as well as i nformation about whether the kiln employs existing inherent or add

- on controls for minimizing nitrogen oxide emissions.

If you have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to hearing from you soon. I have contacted Gary in order to arrange the meetings and consultation that the Salt River Pima

Maricopa Indian Community has requested. We are awaiting potential dates.

Colleen McKaughan

520

- 498

- 0118
# C_2007244EN.01001001.xml

| 18.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/10

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 f of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises)

(2007/C 244/03)

| Aid No | Aid to SME — 2/07 — Norway |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Regional aid area (EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 226/06/COL) |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Aid to SMEs for regional development |
| Legal basis | Annual grant offer letters |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount: NOK 190 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1 January 2007 |
| Duration of scheme | 31 December 2013 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs for regional development in the regional aid area |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| Postbox 448 Sentrum |
| N-0104 Oslo |

Aid No

Aid to SME — 2/07 — Norway

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Regional aid area (EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 226/06/COL)

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Aid to SMEs for regional development

Legal basis

Annual grant offer letters

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount: NOK 190 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1 January 2007

Duration of scheme

31 December 2013

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs for regional development in the regional aid area

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Postbox 448 Sentrum

N-0104 Oslo

post@innovasjonnorge.no

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.23 Formal requirements as to papers filed. ( a ) *Form.* All papers filed under this subpart must be double-spaced and printed or typewritten on 81 ⁄ 2′′ × 11′′ paper. All copies shall be clear and legible.
( b ) *Caption.* All papers filed must include at the head thereof, or on a title page, the name of the ASC and of the filing party, the title and/or docket number of the proceeding and the subject of the particular paper.
( c ) *Party names, signatures, certificates of service.* All papers filed must set forth the name, address and telephone number of the attorney or party making the filing, must be signed by the attorney or party, and must be accompanied by a certification setting forth when and how service has been made on all other parties.
( d ) *Copies.* Unless otherwise specifically provided in the notice of proceeding or by the ASC during the proceeding, an original and one copy of all documents and papers shall be furnished to the Secretary.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASA International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Alfred C. Angelone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 7, 2003                                  /s/Alfred C. Angelone
                                                ----------------------
                                                Alfred C. Angelone
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics,
Inc.


Date:  June 14, 2005

                             By: /s/  James T. Posillico
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  James T. Posillico
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.


                             By: /s/  James R. Musick
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  James R. Musick
                                 Title: Chairman and Principal Financial Officer
                                 Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4839

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES D. IZAC, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CR-02-58)

Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: May 18, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Warren Bennett, Sicilia S. Chinn, BENNETT & LAWLOR, LLP,

Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Jeb T. Terrien, Assistant

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles D. Izac, Jr. was indicted on one count of unlawful

possession of a firearm by a person previously convicted of a

felony. Before trial, the Government filed a motion in limine

seeking to preclude Izac from presenting a justification defense.

The district court initially denied the motion. The Government

later renewed its motion, and after conducting a hearing the

district court ruled that Izac did not meet the standard of proof

required to present a justification defense. Izac then entered a

conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the district

court’s ruling on the availability of the justification defense.

The district court accepted the plea and sentenced Izac to 180

months’ imprisonment. Izac now appeals the district court’s order

granting the Government’s motion in limine.

We recently held that a conditional guilty plea is not valid

if it purports to preserve for appeal a non-case-dispositive issue.

United States v. Bundy, 392 F.3d 641, 647 (4th Cir. 2004). The

issue sought to be preserved for appeal in this case -- whether the

defendant was entitled to present a justification defense -- is not

case-dispositive. A favorable ruling for Izac would not

necessarily result in dismissal of the charge against him; rather,

such a ruling would merely allow him to make an additional argument

at trial. See id. at 648. Accordingly, Izac’s purported

conditional guilty plea is invalid.
3

The record makes clear the parties’ understanding that Izac

pled guilty only on the condition that he be permitted to appeal

the district court’s ruling on the Government’s motion in limine.

Thus, we cannot say that Izac’s plea was unconditional. See id. at

649. “Because there is no valid plea -- conditional or

unconditional -- to support the judgment of conviction, that

judgment must be vacated” and the case remanded for further

proceedings. Id. On remand, Izac must decide whether to enter

another guilty plea or proceed to trial.

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue

has been authoritatively decided, and argument would not aid the

decisional process. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

VACATED AND REMANDED
#### § 204.4 Computation of required reserves.

(a) In determining the reserve requirement under this part, the amount of cash items in process of collection and balances subject to immediate withdrawal due from other depository institutions located in the United States (including such amounts due from United States branches and agencies of foreign banks and Edge and Agreement corporations) may be deducted from the amount of gross transaction accounts. The amount that may be deducted may not exceed the amount of gross transaction accounts.

(b) United States branches and agencies of a foreign bank may not deduct balances due from another United States branch or agency of the same foreign bank, and United States offices of an Edge or Agreement Corporation may not deduct balances due from another United States office of the same Edge or Agreement Corporation.

(c) Balances “due from other depository institutions” do not include balances due from Federal Reserve Banks, pass-through accounts, or balances (payable in dollars or otherwise) due from banking offices located outside the United States. An institution exercising fiduciary powers may not include in balances “due from other depository institutions” amounts of trust funds deposited with other banks and due to it as a trustee or other fiduciary.

(d) For institutions that file a report of deposits weekly, reserve requirements are computed on the basis of the institution's daily average balances of deposits and Eurocurrency liabilities during a 14-day computation period ending every second Monday.

(e) For institutions that file a report of deposits quarterly, reserve requirements are computed on the basis of the institution's daily average balances of deposits and Eurocurrency liabilities during the 7-day computation period that begins on the third Tuesday of March, June, September, and December.

(f) For all depository institutions, Edge and Agreement corporations, and United States branches and agencies of foreign banks, required reserves are computed by applying the reserve requirement ratios in table 1 to this paragraph (f) to net transaction accounts, nonpersonal time deposits, and Eurocurrency liabilities of the institution during the computation period.

| Reservable liability | Reserve requirement |
| --- | --- |
| *Net Transaction Accounts:* | |
| $0 to reserve requirement exemption amount ($36.1 million). | |
| Over reserve requirement exemption amount ($36.1 million) and up to low reserve tranche ($644.0 million) | 0 percent of amount. |
| Over low reserve tranche ($644.0 million) | $0 plus 0 percent of amount over $644.0 million. |
| Nonpersonal time deposits | 0 percent. |
| Eurocurrency liabilities | 0 percent. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (f)

[Reg. D, 74 FR 25637, May 29, 2009]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting § 204.4, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*