alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009247EN.01000901.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/9

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

2009/C 247/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 22 April 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 64968 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | Establishment by the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) of a digital archive for the education sector |
| Legal basis | : | Agreement between the NRK and the Directorate for Education and Training of the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research on the establishment of and access to the digital clips archive for the sector of education |
| Objective | : | Compensation for the services of general economic interest |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant |
| Aid amount | : | NOK 15,25 million |
| Duration | : | 18 months from the date of approval by the Authority |
| Economic sectors | : | Education and Media |
| Name of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Education and Research, Directorate for Education and Training |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

22 April 2009

Case number

:

64968

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

:

Establishment by the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) of a digital archive for the education sector

Legal basis

:

Agreement between the NRK and the Directorate for Education and Training of the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research on the establishment of and access to the digital clips archive for the sector of education

Objective

:

Compensation for the services of general economic interest

Form of aid

:

Direct grant

Aid amount

:

NOK 15,25 million

Duration

:

18 months from the date of approval by the Authority

Economic sectors

:

Education and Media

Name of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Education and Research, Directorate for Education and Training

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
#### § 229.37 Variation by agreement.

The effect of the provisions of subpart C may be varied by agreement, except that no agreement can disclaim the responsibility of a bank for its own lack of good faith or failure to exercise ordinary care, or can limit the measure of damages for such lack or failure; but the parties may determine by agreement the standards by which such responsibility is to be measured if such standards are not manifestly unreasonable.
§ 16.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the rulemaking authority of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for national banks in 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* and 93a, and for Federal savings associations in 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464, and 5412(b)(2)(B).
( b ) *Purpose.* This part sets forth rules governing the offer and sale of securities issued by a national bank or Federal savings association.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to offers and sales of national bank or Federal savings association securities by issuers, underwriters, and dealers.
[59 FR 54798, Nov. 2, 1994, as amended at 82 FR 8107, Jan. 23, 2017]
# C_2023202EN.01003001.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/30

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2023

(2023/C 202/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0737 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86113 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6480 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9751 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7580 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,625 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 368,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4788 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9530 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 25,0875 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6061 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4342 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4126 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4460 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 399,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,3284 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6541 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 979,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9589 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,228 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,408 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2866 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6188 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,6170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0737

JPY

Japanese yen

149,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86113

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6480

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9751

ISK

Iceland króna

149,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7580

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,625

HUF

Hungarian forint

368,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4788

RON

Romanian leu

4,9530

TRY

Turkish lira

25,0875

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6061

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4342

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4126

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7696

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4460

KRW

South Korean won

1 399,86

ZAR

South African rand

20,3284

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6541

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 979,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9589

PHP

Philippine peso

60,228

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,408

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2866

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6188

INR

Indian rupee

88,6170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
EXHIBIT 4.24


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



$200,000.00                Milpitas, California                     May 19, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com, Inc., promises to pay Richard S. Barton the sum
of Two hundred  thousand  ($200,000.00)  with no  interest.  Principal is due on
demand.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  when  demanded the whole sum of
principal shall start bearing  interest at the rate of 10% per annum,  and shall
become immediately due. If action be instituted on this note, the maker promises
to pay such sum as a court may fix as attorney's fees.







Adatom.com, Inc.

By: /S/MICHAEL M. WHEELER
    ---------------------
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller
§ 19.198 Conferences. ( a ) *General.* The Comptroller may confer with a proposed respondent concerning allegations of misconduct or other grounds for censure, debarment, or suspension, regardless of whether a proceeding for censure, debarment, or suspension has been commenced. If a conference results in a stipulation in connection with a proceeding in which the individual is the respondent, the stipulation may be entered in the record at the request of either party to the proceeding.
( b ) *Voluntary suspension or debarment.* In order to avoid the institution of, or a decision in, a debarment or suspension proceeding, a person who practices before the OCC may consent to suspension or debarment from practice. At the discretion of the Comptroller, the individual may be suspended or debarred in accordance with the consent offered.
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNORJuly 27, 2009 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U.S. EPA Region I 1 Congress St., Suite I 100 Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 Certification of Required SIP Elements Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour PM1 .5 NAAQS )ArA Dear MS.Conroy: I am pleased to submit the enclosed documentation that the Maine State Implementation Plan for air quality adequately meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) "infrastructure" requirements ofsection 110a(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.SNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) . As you know, pursuant to sections 110(a)(1) and (2) ofthe CAA, all states are required to submit plans to provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement ofthe 8-hour ozone and PM1 .5 standards. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP requirements, including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance ofthe standards no later than three years after the promulgation ofa newstandard (September 21, 2006) . The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is submitting this document to certify that its existing SIP already satisfies all section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The initial Maine State Implementation Plan was approved by EPAon October 28, 1972, and has subsequently been revised and expanded on numerous occasions. The infrastructure elements required by section 110(a)(2) are fully addressed by existing Maine statutes, regulations and plans. If you should have any questions, please contact Jeff Crawford at 207-287-2437.

James P. Brooks, Director Bureau ofAir Quality Attachments (1) cc: Ann Arnold Rich Burkhart Jeff Crawford SIP file (w/encl .) EPA file AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333 "0017 106 HOGAN ROAD (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 PORTLAND

312 CANCOROAD PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 (207) 822" 6300 FAX : (207) 822

"6303 DAVID P . LITTELL COMMISSIONER

PRESQUE ISLE 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769 " 2094 (207) 764-0477 FAX : (207) 760-3143 web site: www

.maine .gov/dep printed on recycled paper
----

Action brought on 13 March 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway

(Case E-1/06)

(2006/C 117/05)

An action against the Kingdom of Norway was brought before the EFTA Court on 13 March 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Niels Fenger and Per Andreas Bjørgan, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, 35, Rue Belliard, B-1040 Brussels.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

----
§ 229.35 Indorsements. ( a ) *Indorsement standards.* A bank (other than a paying bank) that handles a check during forward collection or a returned check shall indorse the check in a manner that permits a person to interpret the indorsement, in accordance with American National Standard (ANS) Specifications for Physical Check Endorsements, X9.100-111 (ANS X9.100-111), for a paper check other than a substitute check; ANS Specifications for an Image Replacement Document, X9.100-140 (ANS X9.100-140), for a substitute check; and ANS Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data—Domestic, X9.100-187 (ANS X9.100-187), for an electronic check; unless the Board by rule or order determines that different standards apply or the parties otherwise agree.
( b ) *Liability of bank handling check.* A bank that handles a check for forward collection or return is liable to any bank that subsequently handles the check to the extent that the subsequent bank does not receive payment for the check because of suspension of payments by another bank or otherwise. This paragraph applies whether or not a bank has placed its indorsement on the check. This liability is not affected by the failure of any bank to exercise ordinary care, but any bank failing to do so remains liable. A bank seeking recovery against a prior bank shall send notice to that prior bank reasonably promptly after it learns the facts entitling it to recover. A bank may recover from the bank with which it settled for the check by revoking the settlement, charging back any credit given to an account, or obtaining a refund. A bank may have the rights of a holder with respect to each check it handles.
( c ) *Indorsement by a bank.* After a check has been indorsed by a bank, only a bank may acquire the rights of a holder— ( 1 ) Until the check has been returned to the person initiating collection; or
( 2 ) Until the check has been specially indorsed by a bank to a person who is not a bank.
( d ) *Indorsement for depositary bank.* A depositary bank may arrange with another bank to apply the other bank's indorsement as the depositary bank indorsement, provided that any indorsement of the depositary bank on the check avoids the area reserved for the depositary bank indorsement as specified in the indorsement standard applicable to the check under paragraph (a) of this section. The other bank indorsing as depositary bank is considered the depositary bank for purposes of subpart C of this part.
[53 FR 19433, May 27, 1988, as amended at 82 FR 27582, June 15, 2017]
# C_2021514EN.01000201.xml

| 21.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 514/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 514/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 December 2021

(2021/C 514/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1273 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85205 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3010 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0408 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,234 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 366,69 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6337 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9486 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,0434 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5855 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4569 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7943 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6778 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5415 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8271 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1882 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 244,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7645 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,256 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,5900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,889 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4219 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4407 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,5025 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1273

JPY

Japanese yen

127,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85205

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3010

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0408

ISK

Iceland króna

146,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,234

HUF

Hungarian forint

366,69

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6337

RON

Romanian leu

4,9486

TRY

Turkish lira

20,0434

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5855

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4569

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7943

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6778

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5415

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,40

ZAR

South African rand

17,8271

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1882

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 244,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7645

PHP

Philippine peso

56,256

RUB

Russian rouble

83,5900

THB

Thai baht

37,889

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4219

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4407

INR

Indian rupee

85,5025

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# EUR-Lex - E1997P0003 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# E1997P0003

**Request for an advisory opinion from the EFTA Court by Nedre Romerike herredsrett by decision of that court of 2 September 1997 in the case of Jan og Kristian Jæger AS v. Opel Norge AS (Case E-3/97) **

*
Official Journal C 376 , 11/12/1997 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Request for an advisory opinion from the EFTA Court by Nedre Romerike herredsrett by decision of that court of 2 September 1997 in the case of Jan og Kristian Jæger AS v. Opel Norge AS (Case E-3/97) (97/C 376/12)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by decision of 2 September 1997 of Nedre Romenike herredsrett (Nedre Romerike municipal court), Norway, which was received at the Court Registry on 4 September 1997, for an advisory opinion in the case of Jan og Kristian Jæger AS v. Opel Norge AS, on the following questions:

1. (a) Does Article 53 (1) of the EEA Agreement, regarding the rules on selective distribution, prohibit an importer, on entering into a dealership agreement concerning motor vehicles, from imposing conditions regarding a certain shareholder structure of the dealer?

(b) If so, will this be applicable regardless of the aim or effects of the condition?

(c) Did such a prohibition exist in September 1995?

2. (a) Does Article 53 (1) of the EEA Agreement, regarding the rules on selective distribution, prohibit an importer, on entering into a dealership agreement concerning motor vehicles, from imposing conditions regarding the owners and/or general manager in the dealer company holding ownership interests in other companies which deal and/or hold ownership interests in other companies which deal with motor vehicles?

(b) If so, is this applicable regardless of the aim or effects of the condition?

(c) Did such a prohibition exist in September 1995?

3. Does it follow from Article 53 (1) of the EEA Agreement that an importer of motor vehicles in September 1995 had an obligation to enter into a dealership agreement with any or all who wished to be dealers and who otherwise met the qualitative criteria the importer could lawfully impose on dealers?

4. Is Article 53 (1) of the EEA Agreement to be construed to the effect that negotiations about an agreement or an agreement to enter into an agreement is tantamount to an 'agreement` and, consequently, sufficient to bring the matter within the scope of Article 53 (1)?

5. Is Article 53 (1) of the EEA Agreement to be construed to the effect that a refusal to accept a dealer falls to be examined pursuant to Article 53 when that refusal can serve to enforce an anticompetitive policy or contractual pratice between the importer and other, existing dealers?

6. Is Article 53 (2) to be construed to the effect that if a condition is contrary to Article 53 (1) and/or the rules on selective distribution, the entire contract is then of no legal force or
TS-AMID30

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3 

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substances 

at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
427 A.2d 242

#### Commonwealth v. Boyd, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted June 29, 1979.

A. Charles Peruto, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant

District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P. J., and WIEAND and LOUIK, JJ.*

*

Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation. Judge Maurice Louik of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
#### Patrick Hooper, Respondent, *v.*The Staten Island Midland Railroad Co., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, entered upon the verdict of a jury, in favor of the plaintiff. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.

Pinney *&*Thayer (Warren C. Van Slyke, of counsel), for appellant.

John M. Gardner (Jonathan Deyo, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was injured while a passenger in a stage that was *“*rightfully upon a-public highway, upon which was laid defendant’s tracks,” by *722reason of a collision between the stage and one of the defendant’s ears, which collision, it is alleged, occurred through the negligence of the defendant’s agent or servant. The answer denied that the collision occurred on a public highway, and alleged that the plaintiff and the stage in which he was riding were unlawfully upon the private property of the defendant, without any right, permission or license, and that the accident was caused by the negligence of the plaintiff, and without any fault or negligence on the part of the defendant. It appears from the evidence that the stage stopped on the defendant’s track to fix some portion of the harness, that the place where the accident occurred was known as the “Egbert Farm,” and that permission to lay tracks thereon had theretofore been given to the defendant by a former owner.

Upon the trial, the plaintiff’s counsel admitted on the record “ that the place where this accident occurred was not a public highway acquired by the public by legal proceedings, or dedication, or proceedings to open streets,” and, again, that “ there was no such user of this street that established it as a public; highway by user.” Notwithstanding such admission, the trial justice refused to charge the jury that “ there is no proof in this case that the place where the accident occurred was a public road,” and left it to them (the jury) to determine whether the accident took place upon a public or private road. It' is obvious that such refusal was highly prejudicial to the defendant. The plaintiff having conceded that the accident occurred upon a private road, the only obligation, under the circumstances, resting upon the defendant was not to inflict upon the plaintiff wanton and wilful injury. Victory v. Baker, 67 N. Y. 366; Downes v. Elmira Bridge Co., 41 App. Div. 339; Lagerman v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., N. Y. L. J., Aug. 24, 1900. Instead of instructing the jury to that effect, they were substantially charged that they might hold the defendant liable if it failed to exercise the care owing from it to the plaintiff upon a public highway. This was clearly error of such a serious character as to call for a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
x10c4-q12015






EXHIBIT 10(c)(4)


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY


Only non-employee directors are compensated for service on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Georgia Power Company.


At the election of the director, all or a portion of the cash retainer may be payable in common stock of The Southern Company, and all or a portion of total cash compensation may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan and all of the stock retainer may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan until membership on the Board is terminated.  There is no pension plan for non-employee directors.


Prior to July 1, 2015, the pay components are as follows:


	
				
	 
	Ÿ
	Annual Cash Retainer Fee:
	$44,000 per year (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer:
	$5,000 per year (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Annual Stock Retainer Fee:
	$30,000 per year payable in common stock of The Southern Company (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Board Meeting Fees:
	If more than five meetings of the Board are held in a calendar year, $1,800 will be paid for participation in each meeting of the Board beginning with the sixth meeting.



	 
	Ÿ
	Committee Meeting Fees:
	If more than five meetings of any one Committee are held in a calendar year, $1,200 will be paid for participation in each meeting of that Committee beginning with the sixth meeting.






Effective July 1, 2015, the pay components are as follows:


	
				
	 
	Ÿ
	Annual Cash Retainer Fee:
	$44,000 per year (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer:
	$8,000 per year (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Annual Stock Retainer Fee:
	$34,500 per year payable in common stock of The Southern Company (paid quarterly)



	 
	Ÿ
	Board Meeting Fees:
	If more than six meetings of the Board are held in a calendar year, $1,800 will be paid for participation in each meeting of the Board beginning with the seventh meeting. 



	 
	Ÿ
	Committee Meeting Fees:
	If more than six meetings of any one Committee are held in a calendar year, $1,500 will be paid for participation in each meeting of that Committee beginning with the seventh meeting.