alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
March 31, 1998

EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                        ------------------

(Unaudited - Dollars in millions)                         1998       1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings:
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes $ 134.4     $ 171.7
 Add:  Fixed charges                                      14.2        12.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings as adjusted                                   $ 148.6     $ 184.4
==========================================================================
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                   $   11.7     $  10.2
   Interest portion of rent expense                        2.5         2.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                                   $   14.2     $  12.7
==========================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        10.5        14.5
==========================================================================


For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes and
fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest expense and the estimated
interest portion of rent expense.
<PAGE>
#### § 1808.400 Notice of Guarantee Availability.

Interested parties will be invited to submit Qualified Issuer Applications and Guarantee Applications in accordance with this interim rule and the applicable Notice of Guarantee Availability. The NOGA will set forth application and eligibility requirements for an entity that wishes to be designated as a Qualified Issuer (including, in the CDFI Fund's sole discretion, the Designated Bonding Authority) and a Qualified Issuer that wishes to be approved to receive a Guarantee. The NOGA may also contain eligibility requirements, application procedures, and additional terms and conditions for entities wishing to serve as Servicers, Program Administrators, and other roles as may be determined by the CDFI Fund. The NOGA will advise interested parties on how to apply and will establish criteria, deadlines, and other Qualified Issuer and Guarantee Application requirements, including specifying any additional terms and conditions, limitations, special rules, procedures, and restrictions for a given application period.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inrob Tech Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Ben-Tsur Joseph, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/
-----------------------------
Ben-Tsur Joseph, Chief Executive/Financial Officer
May 15, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24370]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Senior Executive Service; Legal Division Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of members of the Legal Division Performance Review 
Board (PRB).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Legal Division PRB. The purpose of this 
Board is to review and make recommendations concerning proposed 
performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, and other appropriate 
personnel actions for incumbents of SES positions in the Legal 
Division.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3000, 
Washington, DC 20220, Telephone: (202) 622-0283 (this is not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Composition of Legal Division PRB

    The Board shall consist of at least three members. In the case of 
an appraisal of a career appointee, more than half the members shall 
consist of career appointees. Composition of the specific PRBs will be 
determined on an ad hoc basis from among the individuals listed in this 
notice.
    The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows: Rupa 
Bhattacharyya, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (International 
Affairs);

Peter A. Bieger, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Banking and 
Finance);
Himamauli Das, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs);
John Harrington, International Tax Counsel;
Bernard J. Knight, Jr., Assistant General Counsel (General Law, Ethics 
and Regulation);
Richard G. Lepley, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (General Law and 
Regulation);
M.J.K. Maher, Jr., Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & 
Intelligence);
Margaret V. Marquette, Chief Counsel, Financial Management Service;
Shira Pavis Minton, Deputy Assistant General Counsel (Ethics);
Mark Monborne, Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement & Intelligence);
Clarissa C. Potter, Deputy Chief Counsel (Technical), Internal Revenue 
Service;
Kevin Rice, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Engraving and Printing;
Laurie Schaffer, Assistant General Counsel (Banking and Finance);
Daniel P. Shaver, Chief Counsel, United States Mint;
Sean M. Thornton, Chief Counsel, Office of Foreign Assets Control;
Robert M. Tobiassen, Chief Counsel, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 
Bureau;
William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service and Paul 
Wolfteich, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Public Debt.

    Dated: September 18, 2009.
George W. Madison,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-24370 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
```
# C_2021411EN.01000301.xml

| 11.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 October 2021

(2021/C 411/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1569 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1138 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0734 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,434 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 360,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6182 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9483 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,3110 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5837 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4499 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0066 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6686 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5681 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 381,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2259 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4591 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5188 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 430,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8335 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,430 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,2390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,161 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3638 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8295 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,7495 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1569

JPY

Japanese yen

129,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84890

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1138

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0734

ISK

Iceland króna

149,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,434

HUF

Hungarian forint

360,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6182

RON

Romanian leu

4,9483

TRY

Turkish lira

10,3110

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5837

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4499

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0066

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6686

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5681

KRW

South Korean won

1 381,80

ZAR

South African rand

17,2259

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4591

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5188

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 430,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8335

PHP

Philippine peso

58,430

RUB

Russian rouble

83,2390

THB

Thai baht

39,161

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3638

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8295

INR

Indian rupee

86,7495

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1268.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Affiliate* means any business entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a member.

*AMA investment grade* means a determination made by the Bank with respect to an asset or pool, based on documented analysis, including consideration of applicable insurance, credit enhancements, and other sources for repayment on the asset or pool, that the Bank has a high degree of confidence that it will be paid principal and interest in all material respects, even under reasonably likely adverse changes to expected economic conditions.

*AMA product* means a structure that is defined by a specific set of terms and conditions that comply with this part 1268 and that is established by a Bank for purposes of governing the Bank's purchase of AMA-eligible loans.

*AMA program* means a Bank-established program to buy mortgage loans that meet the requirements of this part, which may comprise multiple AMA products.

*Expected losses* means the loss on the asset or pool given the expected future economic and market conditions in the model or methodology used by the Bank under § 1268.5 and applicable to an AMA product.

*Participating financial institution* means a member or housing associate of a Bank that is authorized to sell, credit enhance, or service mortgage loans to or for its own Bank through an AMA program, or a member or housing associate of another Bank that has been authorized to sell, credit enhance, or service mortgage loans to or for the other Bank pursuant to an agreement between the Bank acquiring the AMA product and the Bank of which the selling institution is a member or housing associate.

*Pool* means a group of loans acquired under one or more loan funding commitments, contractual agreements, or similar arrangements.

*Qualified insurer* means an insurer that a Bank approves in accordance with § 1268.5(e)(1) to provide any form of mortgage insurance coverage on assets and pools purchased under an AMA program.

*Residential real property* has the meaning set forth in § 1266.1 of this chapter.
§ 210.30 Payment orders. ( a ) *Rejection.* A sender shall not send a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank unless authorized to do so by the Federal Reserve Bank. A Federal Reserve Bank may reject, or impose conditions that must be satisfied before it will accept, a payment order for any reason.
( b ) *Selection of an intermediary bank.* For an interdistrict transfer through the Fedwire Funds Service, a Federal Reserve Bank is authorized and directed to execute a payment order through another Federal Reserve Bank. A sender shall not send a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank that requires the Federal Reserve Bank to send a payment order to an intermediary bank (other than a Federal Reserve Bank) unless that intermediary bank is designated in the sender's payment order. A sender shall not send to a Federal Reserve Bank a payment order through the Fedwire Funds Service that instructs use by a Federal Reserve Bank of a funds-transfer system or means of transmission other than the Fedwire Funds Service unless the Federal Reserve Bank agrees with the sender in writing to follow such instructions.
( c ) *Execution date and payment date.* A sender shall not send a payment order through the Fedwire Funds Service that instructs a Federal Reserve Bank to execute the payment order or to pay the beneficiary on a funds-transfer business day that is later than the Fedwire Funds Service funds-transfer business day on which the order is received by the Federal Reserve Bank, unless the Federal Reserve Bank agrees with the sender in writing to follow such instructions.
[55 FR 40801, Oct. 5, 1990, as amended by Reg. J, 87 FR 34359, June 6, 2022]
**EX
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Buckeye Technologies Inc. (“Buckeye”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John B. Crowe,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Buckeye.




Dated
                this 31stday of August, 2006/s/
                John B. CroweJohn
                B. Crowe
              Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 161.51 [Reserved]
#### §§ 217.54-217.60 [Reserved]
42573.

#### NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA et al. v. LITTLE, by Next Friend.

Hall,’Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court overruling a motion to dismiss an appeal to the superior court from a judgment of the court of ordinary denying an application by Thomas G. Little, Jr., a minor, by his next friend Alex McLennan, for the removal of the appointed guardians of the person and property of the minor. The ground of the motion to dismiss the appeal is that the appeal bond did not bind the party appealing the judgment as principal but bound only the party’s next friend in his individual capacity. The bond was originally executed.

“/a/ ALEX McLennan (SEAL)

THOMAS G. LITTLE, JR., by his next friend, ALEX McLennan, Principal”

It was amended to be executed:

“THOMAS G. LITTLE, JR., by his next friend, alex Mclennan, (seal)

By: /s/ ALEX McLENNAN

Principal”

We cannot say that the manner of execution of the bond originally or as amended resulted in “no bond whatever being given by or on behalf of” the party or by someone acting *328in his name, as in *White v. Williamson,*44 Ga. App. 428 (161 SE 654), and *Stewart v. Stewart,*106 Ga. App. 211 (126 SE2d 716). The named principal executing the bond was Thomas G. Little, Jr. The words accompanying the signature show that the next friend of the party is executing the. bond on behalf of the party and is acting in the name of the party.-- Nor can we say that the next friend signed the instrument as such “without more” so as to make it his individual undertaking, or that he did not sign the name of his principal with the result that the principal is not bound, as was held in *McCoy v. Sasnett,*77 Ga. App. 819, 821 (49 SE2d 913). The next friend signed the party’s name, Thomas G. Little, Jr., by means of a typewriter and his own name by pen, resulting in the execution of the bond by the party as principal.

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Submitted February 6, 1967

Decided March 1, 1967.

*Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, Tench C. Coxe, William H. Schroder, John D. McLanahan, Frank Fuller,*for appellants.

*Alex McLennan, Stone & Stone, Noah J. Stone,*for appellee.

It is not contended that the next friend was not authorized to execute and sign the appeal bond on behalf of the minor as principal. Under *Code*§ 6-107 the party to the proceeding in the court of ordinary appealed to the superior court and was bound as principal on the bond. *Ganns v. Worrell,*216 Ga. 512 (117 SE2d 533); *Touchton v. Stewart,*222 Ga. 455 (150 SE2d 643). The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant’s renewed motion to dismiss and motion to strike amendments.

*Judgment affirmed.*
| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -1- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -2- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -3- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -4- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -5- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -6- |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -7- |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -8- |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| WM-QuickForms-SA/FA  (1/10/12)Obligor #____________, AU #____________Deal #____________, Facility #____________ | -9- |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|

----

| By:    | /s/ Jonathan Wolk  (SEAL) |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Jonathan Wolk                       |
| Title: | Senior Vice President & CFO     |
<PAGE>

                              AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                         STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT

This second Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement dated May 15, 1995, is
made by and between CIBA Vision Group Management, Inc. ("CIBA") and Autonomous
Technologies Corporation ("Autonomous") as of this 26th day of March 1998.

                                    Summary
                                    -------
The parties hereto desire to accelerate the issuance of certain common stock by
Autonomous to CIBA that would have otherwise occurred on May 15, 1999.

                                   Amendment
                                   ---------
The parties agree to amend the Strategic Alliance Agreement as follows:

1.  The parties agree that as a result of the operation of paragraph 3 of the
Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement dated May 5, 1996 as it relates to
the private placement of common stock by Autonomous in June 1997, that the
number of common shares that would be issuable to CIBA on May 15, 1999 is
currently 610,534 (the "CIBA Stock").

2.  The parties agree that Autonomous will issue to CIBA on March 31, 1998, for
good and valuable considerations, the number of shares of stock of the CIBA
Stock that the Autonomous periodic accrual shall represent at March 31, 1998 to
the total expected accrual at May 15, 1999 ($2,400,000).  By means of
illustration, the Autonomous accrual at March 31, 1998 shall be $1,725,000.
This accrual divided by $2,400,000 results in a decimal of .718750, which, when
applied to the CIBA Stock, yields an issuance to CIBA on March 31, 1998 of
438,821 common shares with an accrued value of $1,725,000.

3.  The parties specifically agree that the remaining shares of Autonomous that
are to be issued in accordance with the terms of the Strategic Alliance
Agreement (currently 171,713 shares of CIBA Stock) shall still be governed by
the applicable provisions of the Strategic Alliance Agreement and the Amendment
thereto, including the provision whereby Autonomous shall deliver stock with a
minimum value of $2,400,000 on May 15, 1999, to be reduced by the $1,725,000
accrued value of the common stock issued pursuant to paragraph 2 herein.

4.  All other provisions of the Strategic Alliance Agreement and its Amendment
shall remain as set forth in such Agreement.

CIBA Vision Group Management, Inc.         Autonomous Technologies Corporation


By: /s/ Christopher G. Fitzpatrick          By: /s/ Monty K. Allen
    ------------------------------              ------------------------------
Christopher G. Fitzpatrick                  Monty K. Allen
Corporate Secretary                         Vice President, Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                          EXHIBIT 21.1

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF GLOBAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.


                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
      COMPANY                                                     INCORPORATION
      -------                                                    ---------------
      EBI Securities Corporation                                    Colorado

      EBI Leasing Corporation                                       Colorado

      Eastbrokers North America, Inc.                               Delaware

      MoneyZone.com                                                 Delaware

      Eastbrokers Beteiligungs AG (through June 13, 2000)           Austria

      WMP Bank AG                                                   Austria

      Eastbrokers Warszawski Dom Maklerski s.a.                     Poland

      EB Holding, druzba za upravljanje druzb d.d.                  Slovenia

      BPD Eastbrokers d.d.                                          Slovenia

      Global Capital Markets, LLC                                   New York

      Sutton Online, Inc.                                           New York
#### § 1805.100 Purpose.

The purpose of the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Program is to promote economic revitalization and community development through investment in and assistance to Community Development Financial Institutions.