alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012076EN.01001101.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/11

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 76/08

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 14 December 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 70924 |
| Decision number | : | 395/11/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Liechtenstein |
| Title | : | The prolongation of the State aid scheme under the Media Support Act |
| Legal basis | : | The Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz) |
| Objective | : | To preserve the pluralism of opinions, to promote journalistic-editorial quality as well as to facilitate the dissemination of opinion shaping media in Liechtenstein |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | CHF 11,04 million, annually CHF 1,84 million |
| Duration | : | 1 January 2012-31 December 2017 |
| Economic sectors | : | Media, publishing industry |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Medienkommission |
| Regierungsgebäude |
| FL-9490 Vaduz |
| LIECHTENSTEIN |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

14 December 2011

Case number

:

70924

Decision number

:

395/11/COL

EFTA State

:

Liechtenstein

Title

:

The prolongation of the State aid scheme under the Media Support Act

Legal basis

:

The Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz)

Objective

:

To preserve the pluralism of opinions, to promote journalistic-editorial quality as well as to facilitate the dissemination of opinion shaping media in Liechtenstein

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

:

CHF 11,04 million, annually CHF 1,84 million

Duration

:

1 January 2012-31 December 2017

Economic sectors

:

Media, publishing industry

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Medienkommission

Regierungsgebäude

FL-9490 Vaduz

LIECHTENSTEIN

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
PUBLIC LAW 110–33—JUNE 1, 2007 121 STAT. 223

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2080:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

May 8, considered and passed House.

May 22, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–33

110th Congress

An Act

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to conform the District charter

to revisions made by the Council of the District of Columbia relating to public

education.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFORMING DISTRICT CHARTER TO COUNCIL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PUBLIC EDUCATION.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The District of Columbia Home Rule Act

is amended—

(1) by striking section 452 (sec. 1–204.52, D.C. Official

Code); and

(2) by striking section 495 (sec. 1–204.95, D.C. Official

Code).

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents of such Act

is amended by striking the item relating to section 452 and the

item relating to section 495.

Approved June 1, 2007.

June 1, 2007

[H.R. 2080]
#### § 308.300 Scope.

The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart apply to insured state nonmember banks, to state-licensed insured branches of foreign banks, that are subject to the provisions of section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (section 39) (12 U.S.C. 1831p-1), and to state savings associations (in aggregate, bank or banks and state savings association or state savings associations).
#### § 303.201 Filing procedures.

Applications shall be filed with the appropriate FDIC office. The application shall contain the information specified in each respective section of this subpart, and shall be in letter form as prescribed in § 303.3. Additional information may be requested by the FDIC. Such letter shall be signed by the president, senior officer or a duly authorized agent of the insured depository institution and be accompanied by a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the institution's board of directors or trustees authorizing the application.
#### Barnet Masu et al., Respondents, *v.*Jacob Blumenstein et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

November, 1900.)

Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan — Has jurisdiction of nonresident of the county.

The Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, has jurisdiction of a defendant although he does not reside within the county of New York.

Worthington v. London, etc., Company, 164 N. Y. 81, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

*692H. M. Schaap, for appellants.

H. Knutz, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal was argued before the February Appellate Term, and the judgment affirmed. A motion was subsequently made for a reargument upon the ground that the record contained no evidence as to the residence of the defendants, and hence that the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction of the action, and that this ground for reversal, although stated in appellants’ brief, had apparently been overlooked by the court. The Court of Appeals has now held that the Municipal Courts have jurisdiction of actions against nonresidents, thus overruling the decisions to' the contrary of this court and the Appellate Division in the second department. Worthington v. London, etc., Company, 164 N. Y. 81.

It follows that the judgment was properly affirmed.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed. A ,
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis J. Tarallo,
Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
    Report.








Date: August
      12, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Francis
      J. TaralloFrancis
      J. TaralloChief
      Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 261b.3 Conduct of agency business.

Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of official agency business other than in accordance with this part.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 25, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: November 21, 2014 Meeting convened by UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, 

Environment and the Economy Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on November 21, 2014

to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on

June 18, 2014.

Materials provided by UC Davis are available at: 

http://policyinstitute.ucdavis.edu/informing-policy-3/dialogues-and-conferences/state-andregional-comprehensive-carbon-pricing-and-greenhouse-gas-regulation-in-the-power-sectorunder-the-clean-air-act/

ATTENDEES

External Stakeholders

A large meeting with approximately 39 non-EPA attendees including officials from California 

and Nevada.

EPA

Amy Zimpfer, R9

Ben Machol, R9
§ 1807.101 Summary. ( a ) Through the CMF, the CDFI Fund competitively awards grants to Certified CDFIs and qualified Nonprofit Organizations to leverage dollars for: ( 1 ) The Development, Preservation, Rehabilitation or Purchase of Affordable Housing primarily for Low-Income Families; and
( 2 ) The financing of Economic Development Activities.
( b ) The CDFI Fund selects Recipients to receive CMF Awards through a competitive Application process. CMF Awards may only be used for Eligible Uses set forth in subpart C of this part. Each Recipient will enter into an Assistance Agreement that will require it to leverage the CMF Award amount and abide by other terms and conditions pertinent to any assistance received under this part.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 78 ) ll-E-3 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:05 AM i

i

Sheet 78 of 264 1P. 2 

### A-94-5 2 

## »-E- #

From : Date : Contact : Contac tRepor t Plasti c Composite s NESHA P Melani e Proctor , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PE S Marc h 18,199 6 Ms . Joa n Trac y Company : Venu s Gusme r Telephon e Number : (206 ) 854-266 0 Contac tSummary : The conversatio n regarde d cost s t o conver t aVenu s Gusme

r spra y gun t o aflow coater . Accordin g t o Ms . Tracy , Venu s Gusme r sell s anozzl e and aspra

y ti p fo r $27 2 t o conver

t aspra y gu n int o aflow coater . The sam

e pum p use d fo r th e spra y gu n ca n b e use d fo

r flow coater s and n o othe r part s are necessar

y fo r th e conversion . Ms . Trac y explaine d tha

t th e applicatio n rat

e o f aflow coate

r i s betwee n 5 a n 7 pound s o f resi n pe r minute , whic h i s lowe

r tha n th e applicatio n rate o f

aspra y gu n wit h a n averag e rate o f

8 pound s pe r

minute .
§ 222.28 Effective date, compliance date, and prospective application. ( a ) *Effective date.* This subpart is effective January 1, 2008.
( b ) *Mandatory compliance date.* Compliance with this subpart is required not later than October 1, 2008.
( c ) *Prospective application.* The provisions of this subpart shall not prohibit you from using eligibility information that you receive from an affiliate to make solicitations to a consumer if you receive such information prior to October 1, 2008. For purposes of this section, you are deemed to receive eligibility information when such information is placed into a common database and is accessible by you.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 22, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1752

Lower Tribunal No. 20-10105

________________

The Weisbein Team, P.A., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

David A. Kurz, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Alan Fine, Judge.

Carey Rodriguez Milian LLP, and Ruben Conitzer and David P. Milian 

and Juan J. Rodriguez, for appellant.

Cueto Law Group P.L., and Santiago A. Cueto and Raúl A. Reichard, 

for appellees.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fayad v. Mercy Hosp., Inc., 773 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 3d 
2

DCA 2000).
# C_2022318EN.01000101.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 318/01)

Last publication

OJ C 311, 16.8.2022

Past publications

OJ C 303, 8.8.2022

OJ C 294, 1.8.2022

OJ C 284, 25.7.2022

OJ C 276, 18.7.2022

OJ C 266, 11.7.2022

OJ C 257, 4.7.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 1808.616 Events of default and remedies with respect to Bonds. ( a ) *Events of default.* An event of default with respect to any Bond shall include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Nonpayment of interest or the Agency Administrative Fee when due and payable;
( 2 ) Nonpayment of principal or prepayment price when due and payable;
( 3 ) The use of Bond Proceeds for any purpose other than an Eligible Purpose; and
( 4 ) Any other events of default set forth in the Bond or the Bond Trust Indenture.
( b ) *Default of other Bonds.* An event of default under one Bond shall not constitute an event of default under another Bond.
( c ) *Remedies.* Pursuant to the Agreement to Guarantee and the Bond Trust Indenture, remedies upon an event of default shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Declaring the entire amount of unpaid principal and interest on the applicable Bond immediately due and payable; and
( 2 ) Exercising all remedies available under the applicable Agreement to Guarantee and the Bond Trust Indenture.
( d ) Notice and comment. Prior to imposing any remedies pursuant to this section or the Agreement to Guarantee, the Guarantor shall, to the maximum extent practicable, provide the Qualified Issuer with written notice of the proposed sanction and an opportunity to comment. Nothing in this section, however, shall provide a Qualified Issuer the right to any formal or informal hearing or comparable proceeding not otherwise required by law.
CNO 03.31.2015 EX 10.7






Exhibit 10.7


CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CNO Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is amending the treatment of awards under the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") in the event that your employment is terminated due to death or disability or in connection with a Change in Control.  Capitalized terms used in this letter agreement without definition shall have the meaning set forth in the original award agreement(s).  
(a)Effect on Vesting and Exercisability of Performance Shares upon Termination of Employment.  Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary of an outstanding award agreement under the Plan, the following special vesting rules shall apply if your employment with the Company or a Subsidiary terminates prior to Performance Shares becoming fully vested in the circumstances set forth below:


(i)Termination Due to Death or Disability.  If your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary due to your death or Disability, then a pro rata portion of the Performance Shares shall vest (based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period to and including the date your employment is terminated) and, to the extent the performance criteria are met, such pro rata portion shall be paid at the same time as others receive shares of Common Stock under such award.


(ii)Change in Control.  In the event your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary without Cause or by you for Good Reason (as defined in your Option award agreements) within six months prior to and in anticipation of or within 24 months after a Change in Control has occurred, a pro rata portion of any unvested Performance Shares shall vest (based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period to and including the date your employment is terminated) on such date.


(b) All other provisions of the outstanding Performance Share award agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 
 
To execute this amendment and confirm your agreement to its terms you must click the Acknowledge and Agree button in the accompanying email.


Very truly yours,
	
		
	CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Sue Menzel

	Susan L. Menzel, EVP, Human Resources
# C_2013347EN.01000901.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/9

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2013/C 347/09

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 25 September 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74289 |
| Decision number | : | 355/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Type of measure | : | Notified Norwegian aid scheme for the compensation of indirect emission costs and assessed under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Aid amount | : | Approximately NOK 2 840 million between 2013 and 2020 |
| Economic sectors | : | Various energy-intensive industries |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Norwegian Environment Agency |
| PO Box 5672 Sluppen |
| 7485 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

25 September 2013

Case number

:

74289

Decision number

:

355/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Type of measure

:

Notified Norwegian aid scheme for the compensation of indirect emission costs and assessed under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

:

Grant

Aid amount

:

Approximately NOK 2 840 million between 2013 and 2020

Economic sectors

:

Various energy-intensive industries

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Norwegian Environment Agency

PO Box 5672 Sluppen

7485 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795196
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,097,685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,961,058
<PP&E>                                      24,189,939
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,387,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,182,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          488,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,693,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,182,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               723,119
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               202,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            288,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   288,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.25
        

</TABLE>
```

[House Report 106-627]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-627

======================================================================

 
    PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4392, THE INTELLIGENCE 
                 AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

May 18, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 506]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 506, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4392, 
the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, under 
a modified open rule. The rule provides one hour of general 
debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence.
    The rule waives points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
(requiring a three-day availability of the report). The waiver 
of clause 4(a) of rule XIII is necessary because the report to 
accompany H.R. 4392 was not available until May 17th and the 
bill may be considered on the House floor as early as May 19th. 
The rule provides that it shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence now printed in the bill.
    The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered by title and that each title 
shall be considered as read. The rule waives points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI (prohibiting 
nongermane amendments). The waiver of clause 7 of rule XVI is 
necessary because the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
contains new provisions not included in the bill as introduced. 
The rule provides for the consideration of only pro forma 
amendments for the purpose of debate and those amendments 
preprinted in the Congressional Record prior to their 
consideration, which may be offered only by the Member who 
caused it to be printed or his designee, and shall be 
considered as read.
    The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
to postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to 
reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if 
the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule 
provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                  

```