alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form
S-8 No. 33-25646 pertaining to the 1993 Employees Stock Purchase Plan of
National Home Centers, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 1997, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of National Home Centers, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 1997.


                                             /s/Arthur Andersen LLP



Fayetteville, Arkansas
April 30, 1997
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 20, 2024

No. 04-24-00202-CV

IN RE Allen SPROUL, Relator

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On March 21, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, the record, and the response, the court concludes relator has demonstrated that he is 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally 

GRANTED. Respondent shall have fourteen days from the date of this order to vacate its rulings 

denying relator’s plea to the jurisdiction and granting real party in interest’s motion to compel. The 

writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court fails to comply within fourteen days of the date 

of this opinion and order.

It is so ORDERED on June 20, 2024.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of June, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of the 37th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, styled Lorine Lagatta v. Allen 

Sproul, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

#### § 249.105 Calculation of required stable funding amount.

(a) *Required stable funding amount.* A Board-regulated institution's RSF amount equals the Board-regulated institution's required stable funding adjustment percentage as determined under paragraph (b) of this section multiplied by the sum of:

(1) The carrying values of a Board-regulated institution's assets (other than amounts included in the calculation of the derivatives RSF amount pursuant to § 249.107(b)) and the undrawn amounts of a Board-regulated institution's credit and liquidity facilities, in each case multiplied by the RSF factors applicable in § 249.106; and

(2) The Board-regulated institution's derivatives RSF amount calculated pursuant to § 249.107(b).

(b) *Required stable funding adjustment percentage.* A Board-regulated institution's required stable funding adjustment percentage is determined pursuant to table 1 to this paragraph (b).

| Required stable funding adjustment percentage | Percent |
| --- | --- |
| Global systemically important BHC or GSIB depository institution | 100 |
| Category II Board-regulated institution | 100 |
| Category III Board-regulated institution with $75 billion or more in average weighted short-term wholesale funding and Category III Board-regulated institution that is a consolidated subsidiary of such a Board-regulated institution | 100 |
| Category III Board-regulated institution with less than $75 billion in average weighted short-term wholesale funding and any Category III Board-regulated institution that is a consolidated subsidiary of such a Category III Board-regulated institution | 85 |
| Category IV Board-regulated institution with $50 billion or more in average weighted short-term wholesale funding | 70 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)—Required Stable Funding Adjustment Percentages

(c) *Transition into a different required stable funding adjustment percentage.*

(1) A Board-regulated institution whose required stable funding adjustment percentage increases from a lower to a higher required stable funding adjustment percentage may continue to use its previous lower required stable funding adjustment percentage until the first day of the third calendar quarter after the required stable funding adjustment percentage increases.

(2) A Board-regulated institution whose required stable funding adjustment percentage decreases from a higher to a lower required stable funding adjustment percentage must continue to use its previous higher required stable funding adjustment percentage until the first day of the first calendar quarter after the required stable funding adjustment percentage decreases.
Exhibit 12.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Vittorio NotarpietroName:
    
    Vittorio NotarpietroTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 272

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 272 appear at 86 FR 11623, Feb. 26, 2021.

#### § 272.1 Authority.

This part is issued by the Federal Open Market Committee (the Committee) pursuant to the requirement of section 552 of title 5 of the United States Code that every agency shall publish in the Federal Register its rules of procedure.
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 State ofSubsidiary
    
    Incorporation5901 Westown Parkway MOB, LLC
    
    DE593HR, Inc.
    
    TNAllenmore C, LLC
    
    DEAnkeny North MOB, LLC
    
    DEBellaire Medical Plaza SPE, LLC
    
    DEChippenham Medical Offices SPE, LLC
    
    DEClive Wellness Campus Building One, LLC
    
    DEClive Wellness Campus Building Two, LLC
    
    DEClive Wellness Campus Building Five, LLC
    
    DEDallas County MOB, LLC
    
    DEDes Moines South Medical Building, LLC
    
    DEDes Moines South Medical Building II, LLC
    
    DEDurham Medical Office Building, Inc.
    
    TXHealthcare Acquisition of Texas, Inc.
    
    ALHealthcare Realty Services Incorporated
    
    TNHR-Pima, LLC
    
    DEHR Acquisition I Corporation
    
    MDHR Acquisition of Alabama, Inc.
    
    ALHR Acquisition of Pennsylvania, Inc.
    
    PAHR Acquisition of San Antonio, Ltd.
    
    ALHR Acquisition of Virginia Limited Partnership
    
    ALHR Assets, LLC
    
    DEHR Carolinas Holdings, LLC
    
    DEHR Interests, Inc.
    
    TXHR Ladco Holdings, LLC
    
    DEHR of Bonita Bay, Ltd.
    
    ALHR of Carolinas, LLC
    
    DEHR of California, Inc.
    
    ALHR of Indiana, LLC
    
    DEHR of Iowa, LLC
    
    DEHR of Kingsport, Inc.
    
    ALHR of Los Angeles, Inc.
    
    ALHR of Los Angeles, Ltd.
    
    ALHR of Massachusetts, Inc.
    
    ALHR of Nashville, LLC
    
    DEHR of San Antonio, Inc.
    
    TXHR of Sarasota, Ltd.
    
    ALHRT Holdings, Inc.
    
    DEHRT of Alabama, Inc.
    
    ALHRT of Delaware, Inc.
    
    DEHRT of Illinois, Inc.
    
    DEHRT of Louisiana, Inc.
    
    LAHRT of Mississippi, Inc.
    
    DEHRT of Roanoke, Inc.
    
    VA




---



##### 



State ofSubsidiary
    
    IncorporationHRT of Tennessee, Inc.
    
    TNHRT of Virginia, Inc.
    
    VAHRT Properties of Texas, Ltd.
    
    TXJohnston-Willis Medical Offices SPE, LLC
    
    DEK-S Building SPE, LLC
    
    DEPasadena Medical Plaza SSJ Ltd.
    
    FLPennsylvania HRT, Inc.
    
    PAProperty Technology Services, Inc.
    
    TNRoseburg Surgery Center, LLC
    
    DESouthwest General Medical Building (TX) SPE, LLC
    
    DEStevens Pavilion, LLC
    
    DEStevens Pavilion Parent, LLC
    
    DEUnico HRT 2005 MOB Venture, LLC
    
    DEUnico HRT 2006 MOB Venture, LLC
    
    DEYakima Valley Parent, LLC
    
    DEYakima Valley Subsidiary, LLC
    
    DEWentworth Holding Company, LLC
    
    DE
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.66 Professional association membership; competency. ( a ) *Membership in appraisal organizations.* A State certified appraiser or a State licensed appraiser may not be excluded from consideration for an assignment for a federally related transaction solely by virtue of membership or lack of membership in any particular appraisal organization.
( b ) *Competency.* All staff and fee appraisers performing appraisals in connection with federally related transactions must be State certified or licensed, as appropriate. However, a State certified or licensed appraiser may not be considered competent solely by virtue of being certified or licensed. Any determination of competency shall be based upon the individual's experience and educational background as they relate to the particular appraisal assignment for which he or she is being considered.
§ 192.300 Offering circular requirements. ( a ) *Content and filing requirements.* A savings association must prepare and file its offering circular in compliance with this part, Form OC, and the applicable SEC registration statement form required under 12 CFR 16.15. A Federal savings association must file its offering circular with the appropriate OCC licensing office and a State savings association must file its offering circular with the appropriate FDIC region. If filing an amendment, the savings association also must comply with §§ 192.155 and 192.165.
( b ) *Member approval.* A savings association must condition its stock offering upon member approval of its plan of conversion.
( c ) *Agency review.* The appropriate Federal banking agency will review the offering circular and may comment on the included disclosures and financial statements. The appropriate Federal banking agency will not approve the adequacy or accuracy of the offering circular or the disclosures.
( d ) *Revised filings.* A savings association must file any revised offering circular, final offering circular, and any post-effective amendment to the final offering circular in accordance with the procedures in §§ 192.155 and 192.165.
( e ) *Request for effectiveness.* After a savings association satisfactorily addresses the appropriate Federal banking agency's comments, the savings association must request that the appropriate Federal banking agency declare the offering circular effective for a time period. The time period may not exceed the maximum time period for the completion of the sale of all of the savings association's shares under § 192.400.
# C_2013277EN.01001001.xml

| 26.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 15 May 2013

in Case E-13/12

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community)

2013/C 277/08

In Case E-13/12, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing, within the time limits prescribed, to adopt, or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of, the measures necessary to implement into its national legislation the Act referred to at point 10 of part 7.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the Directive and under Article 7 EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 15 May 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that, by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to adopt the measures necessary to implement into its national legislation the Act referred to at point 10 of part 7.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, i.e. Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community, as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, or to notify ESA thereof, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the Directive and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to adopt the measures necessary to implement into its national legislation the Act referred to at point 10 of part 7.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, i.e. Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community, as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, or to notify ESA thereof, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the Directive and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement;

| 2. | orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
         Superior  Wireless   Communications,   Inc.  June  30,  1998  financial
         statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
         financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000793986
<NAME>                                Superior Wireless Communications, Inc.



<S>      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                                        687
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              687
<PP&E>                                                        83,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (59,937)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                740,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         2,770,411
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         6,026
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,036,218)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  740,219
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              2,000
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              152,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            132,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (282,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (282,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (282,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.05)



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

§ 249.130 Timing, method, and retention of disclosures. ( a ) *Applicability.* A covered depository institution holding company, U.S. intermediate holding company, or covered nonbank company that is subject to the minimum stable funding requirement in § 249.100 of this part must publicly disclose the information required under this subpart.
( b ) *Timing of disclosure.* ( 1 ) A covered depository institution holding company, U.S. intermediate holding company, or covered nonbank company that is subject to the minimum stable funding requirement in § 249.100 of this part must provide timely public disclosures every second and fourth calendar quarter of all of the information required under this subpart for each of the two immediately preceding calendar quarters.
( 2 ) A covered depository institution holding company, U.S. intermediate holding company, or covered nonbank holding company that is subject to this subpart must provide the disclosures required by this subpart beginning with the first calendar quarter that includes the date that is 18 months after the covered depository institution holding company, U.S. intermediate holding company, or covered nonbank company first became subject to the minimum stable funding requirement in § 249.100 of this part.
( c ) *Disclosure method.* A covered depository institution holding company, U.S. intermediate holding company, or covered nonbank company must publicly disclose, in a direct and prominent manner, the information required under this subpart on its public internet site or in its public financial or other public regulatory reports.
( d ) *Availability.* The disclosures provided under this subpart must remain publicly available for at least five years after the initial disclosure date.
<PAGE>   1
                                                        EXHIBIT 23.01


                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
LXR Biotechnology Inc.:


We consent to incorporate by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-92488) on Form S-8 of LXR Biotechnology Inc. of our report dated
February 26, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LXR
Biotechnology Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1996, and for the period from April 20, 1992 (date of incorporation) through
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report
on Form 10-KSB of LXR Biotechnology Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


San Francisco, California
March 28, 1997
EXHIBIT 12.1
 PROLOGIS
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (1)
    
    $
    (195,408
    )
    
    $
    987,744
    
    
    $
    714,151
    
    
    $
    300,988
    
    
    $
    215,815Add:Minority interest
    
    
    3,837
    
    
    
    4,814
    
    
    
    3,451
    
    
    
    5,243
    
    
    
    4,875Income taxes
    
    
    68,011
    
    
    
    66,855
    
    
    
    29,786
    
    
    
    26,672
    
    
    
    43,562Interest expense
    
    
    341,305
    
    
    
    368,512
    
    
    
    295,629
    
    
    
    176,698
    
    
    
    152,537Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    217,745
    
    
    $
    1,427,925
    
    
    $
    1,043,017
    
    
    $
    509,601
    
    
    $
    416,789Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    341,305
    
    
    $
    368,512
    
    
    $
    295,629
    
    
    $
    176,698
    
    
    $
    152,537Capitalized interest
    
    
    148,685
    
    
    
    121,656
    
    
    
    95,635
    
    
    
    63,020
    
    
    
    37,374Total fixed charges
    
    $
    489,990
    
    
    $
    490,168
    
    
    $
    391,264
    
    
    $
    239,718
    
    
    $
    189,911Ratio of earnings as adjusted to fixed charges
    
    
    0.4
    
    
    
    2.9
    
    
    
    2.7
    
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    2.2
 
 (1)
    
    The loss from continuing operations for 2008 includes impairment charges of $901.8
million that are discussed in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Due to these
impairment charges, our  fixed charges exceed our earnings as adjusted by $272.2
million.
§ 201.107 Eligibility of demand paper for discount and as security for advances by Reserve Banks. ( a ) The Board of Governors has reconsidered a ruling made in 1917 that demand notes are ineligible for discount under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act. (1917 Federal Reserve Bulletin 378.)
( b ) The basis of that ruling was the provision in the second paragraph of section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act that notes, drafts, and bills of exchange must have a maturity at the time of discount of not more than 90 days, exclusive of grace. The ruling stated that a demand note or bill is not eligible under the provisions of the act, since it is not in terms payable within the prescribed 90 days, but, at the option of the holder, may not be presented for payment until after that time.
( c ) It is well settled as a matter of law, however, that demand paper is due and payable on the date of its issue. The generally accepted legal view is stated in Beutel's Brannan on Negotiable Instruments Law, at page 305, as follows: The words *on demand* serve the same purpose as words making instruments payable at a specified time. They fix maturity of the obligation and do not make demand necessary, but mean that the instrument is due, payable and matured when made and delivered.
( d ) Accordingly, the Board has concluded that, since demand paper is due and payable on the date of its issue, it satisfies the maturity requirements of the statute. Demand paper which otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of the Federal Reserve Act and this part Regulation A, therefore, is eligible for discount and as security for advances by Reserve Banks.
[31 FR 5443, Apr. 16, 1966]