alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1081.214 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) *Prehearing conferences.* The hearing officer may, in addition to the scheduling conference, upon the hearing officer's motion or at the request of any party, direct counsel for the parties to meet with the hearing officer (in person or by electronic means) at a prehearing conference for further discussion of the issues outlined in § 1081.203, or for discussion of any additional matters that in the view of the hearing officer will aid in an orderly disposition of the proceeding, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Identification of potential witnesses and limitation on the number of witnesses;
( 2 ) The exchange of any prehearing materials including witness lists, statements of issues, exhibits, and any other materials;
( 3 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact, and the contents, authenticity, and admissibility into evidence of documents;
( 4 ) Matters of which official notice may be taken; and
( 5 ) Whether the parties intend to introduce prior sworn statements of witnesses as set forth in § 1081.303(h).
( b ) *Transcript.* The hearing officer has discretion to require that a prehearing conference be recorded by a court reporter. A transcript of the conference and any materials filed, including orders, becomes part of the record of the proceeding. A party may obtain a copy of the transcript at that party's expense.
( c ) *Public access.* Any prehearing conferences will be public unless the hearing officer determines, based on the standard set forth in § 1081.119(c), that the conference (or any part thereof) should be closed to the public.
§ 217.400 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart implements provisions of section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365), by establishing a risk-based capital surcharge for global systemically important bank holding companies.
( b ) *Applicability* — ( 1 ) *General.* This subpart applies to a bank holding company that: ( i ) Is an advanced approaches Board-regulated institution or a Category III Board-regulated institution;
( ii ) Is not a consolidated subsidiary of a bank holding company; and
( iii ) Is not a consolidated subsidiary of a foreign banking organization.
( 2 ) *Effective date of calculation and surcharge requirements.* ( i ) A bank holding company identified in § 217.400(b)(1) is subject to § 217.402 of this part and must determine whether it qualifies as a global systemically important BHC by December 31 of the year immediately following the year in which the bank holding company becomes an advanced approaches Board-regulated institution or a Category III Board-regulated institution; and
( ii ) A bank holding company that becomes a global systemically important BHC pursuant to § 217.402 must calculate its GSIB surcharge pursuant to § 217.403 by December 31 of the year in which the bank holding company is identified as a global systemically important BHC and must use that GSIB surcharge for purposes of determining its maximum payout ratio under Table 1 to § 217.11 beginning on January 1 of the year that is immediately following the full calendar year after it is identified as a global systemically important BHC.
( c ) *Reservation of authority.* ( 1 ) The Board may apply this subpart to any Board-regulated institution, in whole or in part, by order of the Board based on the institution's capital structure, size, level of complexity, risk profile, scope of operations, or financial condition.
( 2 ) The Board may adjust the amount of the GSIB surcharge applicable to a global systemically important BHC, or extend or accelerate any compliance date of this subpart, if the Board determines that the adjustment, extension, or acceleration is appropriate in light of the capital structure, size, complexity, risk profile, and scope of operations of the global systemically important BHC. In increasing the size of the GSIB surcharge for a global systemically important BHC, the Board shall follow the notice and response procedures in 12 CFR part 263, subpart E.
[Reg. Q, 80 FR 49105, Aug. 14, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 59075, Nov. 1, 2019]
# C_2022454EN.01011001.xml

| 30.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/110

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 November 2022

(2022/C 454/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0366 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86218 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9010 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9862 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3313 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,334 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 406,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6730 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9193 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,3181 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5414 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4005 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,0965 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6639 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4237 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 375,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6027 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4289 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 301,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6735 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,640 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,706 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5126 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8075 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6548 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0366

JPY

Japanese yen

143,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86218

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9010

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9862

ISK

Iceland króna

147,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3313

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,334

HUF

Hungarian forint

406,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6730

RON

Romanian leu

4,9193

TRY

Turkish lira

19,3181

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5414

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4005

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,0965

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6639

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4237

KRW

South Korean won

1 375,70

ZAR

South African rand

17,6027

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4289

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 301,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6735

PHP

Philippine peso

58,640

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,706

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5126

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8075

INR

Indian rupee

84,6548

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated this ____ day of
March 1999, effective as of March 1, 1999, by and between KONOVER PROPERTY
TRUST, INC. (formerly FAC Realty Trust, Inc.) (the "Company") and C. CAMMACK
MORTON (the "Executive").

                                    RECITALS

        A. The Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment
Agreement with an Effective Date of March 1, 1997 (the "Agreement").

        B. The Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows.

                                    AGREEMENT

        1. All capitalized terms shall be deemed to have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Agreement.

        2. Section 2(e)(ii) and Section 2(e)(iii) of the Agreement shall be
amended by deleting, in each section "twenty percent (20%)" and substituting
fifty percent (50%) in its place and stead.

        3. Except as otherwise noted herein, all other provisions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified and affirmed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hand and seal as of the
effective date hereof.

                                        KONOVER PROPERTY TRUST, INC.


                                        By:     /s/ Patrick M. Miniutti    
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick M. Miniutti
                                           Executive Vice President and 
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                                /s/ C. Cammack Morton     (SEAL)
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                  C. CAMMACK MORTON
#### § 263.21 Failure to appear.

Failure of a respondent to appear in person at the hearing or by a duly authorized counsel constitutes a waiver of respondent's right to a hearing and is deemed an admission of the facts as alleged and consent to the relief sought in the notice. Without further proceedings or notice to the respondent, the ALJ will file with the Board a recommended decision containing the findings and the relief sought in the notice.
# C_2014196EN.01000501.xml

| 26.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/5

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

(2014/C 196/05)

PART I

| Aid reference | GBER 2/2014/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Oslo and Akershus |
| Granting authority | Name | City of Oslo |
| | Address | City Hall |
| N-0037 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid reference

GBER 2/2014/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Oslo and Akershus

Granting authority

Name

City of Oslo

Address

City Hall

N-0037 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

www.oslo.kommune.no

Title of the aid measure

Regional innovation programme 2014

National legal basis

(Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Prop. 1 S (2012-2013)

http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fin/dok/regpubl/prop/2012-2013/prop-1-s-20122013--20122013.html?id=703367

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.akershus.no/ansvarsomrader/neringsutvikling/innovasjon%20og%20nettverk/regionalt-innovasjonsprogram/

Type of measure

Scheme

Yes

Duration

Scheme

1.1.2014 to 31.12.2014

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

All sectors

Type of beneficiary

SME

Yes

Large enterprises

Yes

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

Total amount (2014)

EUR 1 351 250

Aid instrument

(Art.5)

Grant

Yes

PART II

| General Objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME – bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for consultancy in favour of SMEs and SME participation in fairs
  (Art. 26-27) | Aid for consultancy in favour of SMEs
  (Art. 26) | 50 % | |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Art. 30-37) | Aid to young innovative enterprises
  (Art. 35) | EUR 1 million | |
| | Aid for innovation advisory services and for innovation support services
  (Art. 36) | EUR 200 000 per beneficiary within any three-year period | |
| Training aid
  (Art. 38-39) | Specific training
  (Art. 38(1)) | 25 % | |
| | General training
  (Art. 38(2)) | 60 % | |

General Objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME – bonuses in %

Aid for consultancy in favour of SMEs and SME participation in fairs

(Art. 26-27)

Aid for consultancy in favour of SMEs

(Art. 26)

50 %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Art. 30-37)

Aid to young innovative enterprises

(Art. 35)

EUR 1 million

Aid for innovation advisory services and for innovation support services

(Art. 36)

EUR 200 000 per beneficiary within any three-year period

Training aid

(Art. 38-39)

Specific training

(Art. 38(1))

25 %

General training

(Art. 38(2))

60 %

---
# **EXHIBIT 32.4**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer ofVornado Realty Trust, the sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) 10-K for year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| April 12, 2017 |   |   | /s/ Joseph  Macnow |
|           |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|           |   | Title: | Executive Vice President – Chief  Financial Officer and

Chief Administrative Officer of  Vornado Realty Trust,

sole General Partner of Vornado  Realty L.P. |

 

 

 

----
#### § 78.160 Withholding, suspension, deobligation, termination, and recovery of funds by VA.

VA will enforce this part through such actions as may be appropriate. Appropriate actions include withholding, suspension, deobligation, termination, recovery of funds by VA, and actions in accordance with 2 CFR part 200.
```

[House Report 106-652]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-652

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4576, THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                        APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

June 6, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 514]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 514, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4576, 
the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2001, under an 
open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the bill. The rule also waives points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of 
rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or legislative provisions in 
a general appropriations bill and prohibiting reappropriations 
in a general appropriations bill).
    The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
to accord priority in recognition to Members who have 
preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. The 
rule also allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to 
postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce 
voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote 
follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                  

```
§ 1010.18 No Action Letter. ( a ) If the sale of lots is subject to the registration requirements of the Act but the circumstances of the sale are such that no affirmative action to enforce the registration requirements is needed to protect the public interest or prospective purchasers, the Director may issue a No Action Letter.
( b ) To obtain a No Action Letter a developer must submit a request which includes a thorough description of the proposed transaction, the property involved, and the circumstances surrounding the sale.
( c ) The issuance of a No Action Letter will not affect any right which a purchaser has under the Act, and it will not limit future action by the Director if there is evidence to show that affirmative action is necessary to protect the public interest or prospective purchasers. In no event will a No Action Letter be issued after the sale has occurred.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 7, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Enhanced Value II Trust, Series
12


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Enhanced Value II Trust, Series 12 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on May 6, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-202720) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                             


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 3142

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM003AD

B787

- 81205

- SB290022

- 00, ISSUE 001

--- 9/4/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
§ 243.13 Additional covered companies. An additional covered company is any bank holding company or any foreign bank or company that is a bank holding company or is treated as a bank holding company under section 8(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3106(a)) that is: ( a ) Identified as a category II banking organization pursuant to § 252.5 of this title;
( b ) Identified as a category III banking organization pursuant to § 252.5 of this title; or
( c ) Made subject to this part by order of the Board.
[84 FR 59227, Nov. 1, 2019]
42041.

#### NOLES v. ARAGON MILLS.

Argued June 9, 1966

Decided June 21, 1966

Rehearing denied July 19, 1966

*Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Henry A. Stewart, Sr.,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court affirming the award of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation which had denied the employee’s claim on the ground that it had not been filed within one year from the accident as required by *Code*§ 114-305. *Held:*

While the record in this case demanded a finding that the employee’s claim (filed on October 18, 1961) was filed more than a year from the date of the original injury of June 24, 1960, a finding was also demanded that after the original injury of which the employer had full knowledge the employee continued to work in the regular course of his employment until May 19, 1961, when because of aggravation to the original injury caused by specific job-connected incidents, he was unable to continue work. Under these circumstances, the statute of limitation would run from the date the employee was forced to cease work and not from the date of the original injury. *Aetna Casualty &c. Co. v. Cagle,*106 Ga. App. 440 (126 SE2d 907). Accordingly, the board’s finding that the employee’s claim was barred by the statute of limitation was based upon a wrongful application of the law and the judgment of the superior court affirming that award must be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 238.160 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Foreign savings and loan holding company* means a savings and loan holding company as defined in section 10 of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a(a)) that is incorporated or organized under the laws of a country other than the United States.
( b ) *Pre-provision net revenue* means revenue less expenses before adjusting for total loan loss provisions.
( c ) *Stress test cycle* has the same meaning as in subpart O of this part.
( d ) *Total loan loss provisions* means the amount needed to make reserves adequate to absorb estimated credit losses, based upon management's evaluation of the loans and leases that the company has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, as determined under applicable accounting standards.
§ 244.21 Additional exemptions. ( a ) *Securitization transactions.* The federal agencies with rulewriting authority under section 15G(b) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-11(b)) with respect to the type of assets involved may jointly provide a total or partial exemption of any securitization transaction as such agencies determine may be appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors.
( b ) *Exceptions, exemptions, and adjustments.* The Federal banking agencies and the Commission, in consultation with the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, may jointly adopt or issue exemptions, exceptions or adjustments to the requirements of this part, including exemptions, exceptions or adjustments for classes of institutions or assets in accordance with section 15G(e) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-11(e)).