alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Phantom 3

Purchased from DJI.com

Phantom 3 Specs.

Weight 

(Including 

Battery And 

Propellers)

1280 g

Diagonal Size 

(Including 

Propellers)

590 mm

Max Ascent 

Speed

5 m/s

Max Descent 

Speed

3 m/s

Hover Accuracy

Vertical: +/-

10cm

Horizontal: +/-

1m

Max Speed

16 m/s (ATTI 

mode, no wind)

Max Altitude 

Above Sea Level

6000 m

Operating 

Temperature

0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode

GPS/GLONASS

Camera

Sensor

Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 

M)

Lens

FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

ISO Range

100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo)

Shutter Speed

8s -1/8000s

Image Max Size

4000 x 3000
Still Photography Modes

Single Shot

Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Video Recording Modes

Phantom 3 Professional

UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Phantom 3 Advanced

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Max Bitrate Of Video Storage

60 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

Gimbal

Controllable Range

Pitch -90° to +30°

Stabilization

3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

Vision 

Positioning

Max Velocity

Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

Altitude Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment

Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

Remote 

Controller

Operating Frequency

2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Max Distance

2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

Video Output Port

USB
Operating Temperature

0°C- 40°C

Battery

6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder

For tablet or phone

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

101 dBm ±2 dBm

Transmitter Power (EIRP)

FCC: 20 dBm

CE: 16 dBm

Working Voltage

1.2 A @7.4 V

Battery Charger

Voltage

17.4 V

Rated Power

Phantom 3 Professional

100 W

Phantom 3 Advanced

57 W

Intelligent Flight 

Battery

Capacity

4480 mAh

Voltage

15.2 V

Battery Type

LiPo 4S

Energy

68 Wh

Net Weight

365 g

Max Flight Time

Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature

-10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power

100 W

App / Live View

Mobile App

DJI Pilot

EIRP

100mW

Live View Working Frequency

2.4GHz ISM

Live View Quality
720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Latency

220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Required Operating Systems

iOS 8.0 or later

Android 4.1.2 or later

Recommended Devices

iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + 

Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad 

Air 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. 

This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus

Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, 

Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, Nubia Z7 mini

*Support for additional Android devices available as testing and 

development continues
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2302

EDMOND MACHIE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MANUEL VINCENS; ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01068-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edmond Machie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint 

without prejudice and requiring him to file an amended complaint, dismissing his 

complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order, and denying his 

motion for reconsideration.

∗

 With respect to the district court’s dismissal orders, we have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (pleading 

standard); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (authorizing dismissal for failure to comply with court 

order); Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 248 (4th Cir. 2017) (discussing pleading standard), 

cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 738 (2018); Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir. 

1989) (reviewing Rule 41(b) dismissal for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm 

those orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Machie v. Vincens, No. 1:18-cv01068-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. filed & entered Sept. 17, 2018; filed Sept. 25 & entered Sept. 

26, 2018). 

The district court should have construed Machie’s motion for reconsideration as a 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, rather than a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, as it was filed 

within 28 days of the entry of the court’s order dismissing the complaint with prejudice. 

See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 412 & n.11 (4th Cir. 2010); see also 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (providing current time limit for filing motion to alter or amend). 

 ∗ Although Machie did not file a new or amended notice of appeal from the district 

court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), 

(B)(ii), we conclude that Machie’s informal brief serves as the functional equivalent of a 

notice of appeal from that order, see Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992).
3

Nevertheless, because Machie’s motion failed to demonstrate any ground that would 

entitle him to relief pursuant to Rule 59(e), we conclude that the district court did not 

abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Wilkins v. Montgomery, 751 F.3d 214, 

220 (4th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Robinson, 599 F.3d at 407 (describing grounds 

for Rule 59(e) relief). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying postjudgment relief. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# C_2022284EN.01000101.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 284/01)

Last publication

OJ C 276, 18.7.2022

Past publications

OJ C 266, 11.7.2022

OJ C 257, 4.7.2022

OJ C 244, 27.6.2022

OJ C 237, 20.6.2022

OJ C 222, 7.6.2022

OJ C 213, 30.5.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL WILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2867

[ December 6, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Lawrence Michael Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2013

- CF

- 000931

- B

.

M ichael E. Williams, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , C IKLIN and L EVINE ,

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Clarent Energy Services, Inc. and Graham Gilliam v. Leasing
Ventures, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00036

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 50734

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 14, 2017 . The clerk’s record was

filed February 12, 2018

. A ppellant s have filed a n unagreed motion to supplement the clerk’s

record with documents attached to the mot ion. The motion is DENIED.

The motion states: “ It became clear that the record was missing several documents filed by the parties in the days prior to the judgment and notice of appeal. ” The motion provides no explanation why such a problem with the record was not rectified prior to the entry of judgment and the filing of a notice of appeal. In any case, t he rules of appellate procedure provide for records to be certified by the trial court clerk, and there is a specific procedure for supplementation of the clerk’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5 (c)

. Even an agreed clerk’s record must be prepared pursuant to Rule 34.5. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.2. To the extent appellants’ motion can be read to suggest that part of the clerk’s record has been lost or destroyed, the

relevant rule should be followed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(e).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael M a ssengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: M a y 10, 2018
# C_2016320EN.01000701.xml

| 1.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/7

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2016/C 320/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 27 January 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 73094 |
| Decision No | : | 26/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title | : | Restructuring aid to Nordurland Savings Bank and its predecessors |
| Legal basis | : | Act No 125/2008 on the Authority for the Treasury Disbursements due to Unusual Financial Market Circumstances etc.
  Decision of the Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority (Fjármálaeftirlitið; the FME) of 21 March 2009 on the allocation of assets and liabilities of Sparisjóðabanki Íslands.
  Decision of the Governor of the Central Bank of Iceland of 22 January 2010. |
| Objective | : | Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | : | Conversion of claims |
| Amount of aid | : | Gross value of claims converted: ISK 5 519 million (EUR 36 million) |
| Duration | : | Not applicable |
| Economic sectors | : | Financial services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Central Bank of Iceland |
| Kalkofnsvegi 1 |
| 150 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

27 January 2016

Case No

Case No

:

73094

Decision No

Decision No

:

26/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title

Title

:

Restructuring aid to Nordurland Savings Bank and its predecessors

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Act No 125/2008 on the Authority for the Treasury Disbursements due to Unusual Financial Market Circumstances etc.

Decision of the Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority (Fjármálaeftirlitið; the FME) of 21 March 2009 on the allocation of assets and liabilities of Sparisjóðabanki Íslands.

Fjármálaeftirlitið

Decision of the Governor of the Central Bank of Iceland of 22 January 2010.

Objective

Objective

:

Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Conversion of claims

Amount of aid

Amount of aid

:

Gross value of claims converted: ISK 5 519 million (EUR 36 million)

Duration

Duration

:

Not applicable

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Financial services

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Central Bank of Iceland

Kalkofnsvegi 1

150 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of amendment to Approved Tribal-State Compact.

# SUMMARY:

This publishes notice of an Amendment to a Compact between the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Pottawatomi Indians and the State of Michigan providing for the Conduct of Tribal Class III Gaming by the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Pottawatomi Indians taking effect.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 8, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula L. Hart, Acting Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The amendment changes the regulatory payment amount to a minimum of $50,000 or .05% of the Tribe's annual Class III net win, whichever is greater. This amendment also modifies the Tribe's revenue sharing payments conditioned on the Tribe's net win falling below certain levels. The amendment permits downward adjustments of the Tribe's revenue sharing payments.                

Dated: September 30, 2009.

Larry Echo Hawk,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. E9-24301 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  EXHIBIT 27.2
<CIK>  0001014669
<NAME>  STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               287,535
<PP&E>                                         693,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,182
<BONDS>                                        735,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (180,732)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,177
<SALES>                                        665,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               665,933
<CGS>                                          605,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  605,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,014)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,924)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, D. Scott
      Kincer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                D. Scott KincerDAVID
                SCOTT KINCER
              CEO
                and Prin. Executive OfficerDated:
                August 13, 2008
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Natuzzi S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

This Amendment No. 3 on Form 20-F/A to the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this annual report, as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
Dated: July 2, 2019 /s/ Pasquale Natuzzi Pasquale Natuzzi Chief Executive OfficerDated: July 2, 2019 /s/ Vittorio Notarpietro Vittorio Notarpietro Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Natuzzi S.p.A.and will be retained by Natuzzi S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
§ 228.18 Outside retail lending areas. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *Large banks.* The Board evaluates a large bank's record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community in its outside retail lending area pursuant to § 228.22. However, the Board will not evaluate a large bank in its outside retail lending area if it did not originate or purchase loans in any product lines in the outside retail lending area during the evaluation period.
( 2 ) *Intermediate or small banks.* The Board evaluates the record of an intermediate bank, or a small bank that opts to be evaluated under the Retail Lending Test, of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community in its outside retail lending area pursuant to § 228.22, for a particular calendar year, if: ( i ) The bank opts to have its major product lines evaluated in its outside retail lending area; or
( ii ) In the prior two calendar years, the bank originated or purchased outside the bank's facility-based assessment areas more than 50 percent of the bank's home mortgage loans, multifamily loans, small business loans, small farm loans, and automobile loans if automobile loans are a product line for the bank, as described in paragraph II.a.2 of appendix A to this part.
( b ) *Geographic requirements of outside retail lending areas* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A bank's outside retail lending area consists of the nationwide area, excluding: ( i ) The bank's facility-based assessment areas and retail lending assessment areas; and
( ii ) Any county in a nonmetropolitan area in which the bank did not originate or purchase any closed-end home mortgage loans, small business loans, small farm loans, or automobile loans if automobile loans are a product line for the bank.
( 2 ) *Component geographic area.* The outside retail lending area is comprised of component geographic areas. A component geographic area is any MSA or the nonmetropolitan area of any State, or portion thereof, included within the outside retail lending area.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6987
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RANDY GEAN WILLIAMS, a/k/a Malik Strong, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00116-JBF-2) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Gean Williams, Ap pellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Randy Gean Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No. 2:99-cr-00116- JBF-2 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2008). We grant Williams’ motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED