alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013277EN.01001101.xml

| 26.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 3 June 2013

in Case E-14/12

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Principality of Liechtenstein

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Articles 31 and 36 EEA — Obligation on temporary work agencies to deposit a guarantee — Indirect and direct discrimination — Residence requirement — Justification)

2013/C 277/09

In Case E-14/12, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Principality of Liechtenstein — APPLICATION for a declaration that by maintaining in force legislation which imposes on persons resident in Liechtenstein who are responsible for a temporary work agency the obligation to supply a guarantee of 50 000 Swiss francs, whereas the guarantee of 100 000 Swiss francs is imposed upon persons performing a similar function who are resident outside of Liechtenstein, and on agencies seeking to deliver temporary employment services cross-border, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 3 June 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in force legislation which imposes on persons resident in Liechtenstein who are responsible for a temporary work agency the obligation to supply a guarantee of 50 000 Swiss francs, whereas the guarantee of 100 000 Swiss francs is imposed upon persons performing a similar function who are resident outside of Liechtenstein, and on agencies seeking to deliver temporary employment services cross-border, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in force legislation which imposes on persons resident in Liechtenstein who are responsible for a temporary work agency the obligation to supply a guarantee of 50 000 Swiss francs, whereas the guarantee of 100 000 Swiss francs is imposed upon persons performing a similar function who are resident outside of Liechtenstein, and on agencies seeking to deliver temporary employment services cross-border, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | Orders Liechtenstein to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Liechtenstein to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
§ 19.161 Hearing process. ( a ) *Hearing request.* Pursuant to 12 CFR 5.50(f)(6), following receipt of a notice of disapproval of a proposed acquisition of control of a national bank or Federal savings association, a filer may request a hearing by the OCC on the proposed acquisition. A hearing request must: ( 1 ) Be in writing; and
( 2 ) Be filed with the Hearing Clerk of the OCC within ten days after service on the filer of the notice of disapproval. If a filer fails to request a hearing with a timely written request, the notice of disapproval constitutes a final and unappealable order.
( b ) *Hearing order.* Following receipt of a hearing request, the Comptroller will issue, within 20 days, an order that sets forth: ( 1 ) The legal authority for the proceeding and for the OCC's jurisdiction over the proceeding;
( 2 ) The matters of fact or law upon which the disapproval is based; and
( 3 ) The requirement for filing an answer to the hearing order with OFIA within 20 days after service of the hearing order.
( c ) *Answer.* An answer to a hearing order must specifically deny those portions of the order that are disputed. Those portions of the order that the filer does not specifically deny are deemed admitted by the filer. Any hearing under this subpart is limited to those portions of the order that are specifically denied.
( d ) *Effect of failure to answer.* Failure of a filer to file an answer within 20 days after service of the hearing order constitutes a waiver of the filer's right to appear and contest the allegations in the hearing order. If a filer does not file a timely answer, Enforcement Counsel may file a motion for entry of an order of default. Upon a finding that no good cause has been shown for the failure to file a timely answer, the ALJ will file with the Comptroller a recommended decision containing the findings and the relief sought in the hearing order. Any final order issued by the Comptroller based upon a filer's failure to answer is deemed to be an order issued upon consent and is a final and unappealable order.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51944-51945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24218]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement: Lafayette Parish, LA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
December 16, 2005 Notice of Intent for the subject Tier 1 Environmental 
Impact Statement is amended to: (1) change the name of the proposed 
project from the Lafayette Metropolitan Expressway to the Lafayette 
Regional Xpressway (LRX) and (2) add the Louisiana Department of 
Transportation and Development (DOTD) as a Joint Lead Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Carl M. Highsmith, Project 
Delivery Team Leader, Federal Highway Administration, 5304 Flanders 
Drive, Suite A, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, Telephone: (225) 757-
7615, or Mr. Michael Mangham, Commission Chairperson, Lafayette 
Metropolitan Expressway Commission, 406 Audubon Boulevard, Lafayette, 
Louisiana 70503, Telephone: (337) 233-6200, or Ms. Noel Ardoin, 
Environmental Engineer Administrator, Louisiana Department of 
Transportation and Development, Room 502P, 1201 Capitol Access Road, 
Post

[[Page 51945]]

Office Box 94245, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245, Telephone: (225) 
242-4502. Project information may be obtained from the project Internet 
Web site at http://lrxpressway.com.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Lafayette Metropolitan Expressway 
Commission (LMEC) changed the name of the proposed project from the 
Lafayette Metropolitan Expressway to the Lafayette Regional Xpressway 
(LRX). The name of the project was changed to reflect the regional 
context and setting of the proposed toll facility.
    The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development agreed 
to be a Joint Lead Agency for the Lafayette Regional Xpressway Tier 1 
Environmental Impact Statement.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations 
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation of Federal programs and activities, apply to this 
program.)

    Authority:  23 U.S.C., 315; 23 CFR 771.123.

    Dated: September 30, 2009.
Charles W. Bolinger,
Division Administrator, FHWA, Louisiana Division.
[FR Doc. E9-24218 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF RULE 102 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO

. 236

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 25th day of July , 202 3 , upon the recommendation of the

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; the proposal having been

submitted without publication in the interests of justice and efficient administration

pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3),

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of

Pennsylvania that Rule 102 of the Rules of Disciplinar y Enforcement is amended in the

attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No . 103(b), and

shall be effective immediately.

Additions to the rule s are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule s are shown in bold and in brackets.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,581,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,877,833
<PP&E>                                      19,458,736
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,748,210)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,588,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,337,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,588,359
<SALES>                                      1,994,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,072,889
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,123,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,475,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,365,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,891,969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,891,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (70.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (70.73)
        

</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08969**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 08969\08969_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08969\08969_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 08969\08969_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08969\08969_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08969\08969_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08969\08969_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08969\08969_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08969\Certification Statement Plant ID 08969.pdf Plant certification statement 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_ash system block diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_baghouse1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_baghouse2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_baghouse3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_baghouse4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_baghouse5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_bedashsystem.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_bedashsystem2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_CB Water Balance 2009.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_CedarBayaerialmap.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_cedarbaybuildingsandstructures.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_Cedarbaysitelocation.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_flyashsystem.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08969\Supplemental Documents\08969_Part A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### § 202.17 Data collection for credit applications by women-owned, minority-owned, or small businesses.

No motor vehicle dealer covered by section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 12 U.S.C. 5519(a), shall be required to comply with the requirements of section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2, until the effective date of final rules issued by the Board to implement section 704B of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2. This paragraph shall not be construed to affect the effective date of section 704B of the Act for any person other than a motor vehicle dealer covered by section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

[Reg. B, 76 FR 59239, Sept. 26, 2011]
#### § 229.59 Relation to other law.

The Check 21 Act and this subpart supersede any provision of federal or state law, including the Uniform Commercial Code, that is inconsistent with the Check 21 Act or this subpart, but only to the extent of the inconsistency.
Rule 217. Confidential Information and Confidential Documents. Certification.

Unless public access is otherwise constrained by applicable authority, any 

attorney, or any party if unrepresented, who files a document pursuant to these rules with 

a magisterial district court shall comply with the requirements of Sections 7.0 and 8.0 of 

the Case Records Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of 

Pennsylvania (Policy) including a certification of compliance with the Policy and, as 

necessary, a Confidential Information Form[, unless otherwise specified by rule or 

order of court,] or a Confidential Document Form in accordance with the Policy.

Note: Applicable authority includes but is not limited to statute, procedural rule or court 

order. The Case Records Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of 

Pennsylvania (Policy) can be found on the website of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 

at https://www.pacourts.us/public-records. Sections 7.0(D) and 8.0(D) of the Policy 

provide that the certification shall be in substantially the following form:

 

I certify that this filing complies with the provisions of the Case Records 

Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania that 

require filing confidential information and documents differently than nonconfidential information and documents.

The Confidential Information Form and the Confidential Document Form can be 

found at https://www.pacourts.us/public-records.
# C_2005277EN.01002901.xml

| 10.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/29

---

STATE AID — ICELAND

STATE AID — ICELAND

Notice by the EFTA Surveillance Authority to EFTA States, EU Member States and other interested parties

State aid measure 47901 (former SAM 030.02.006) — Proposed aid in the form of a State guarantee in favour of deCODE Genetics in relation to the establishment of a drug development department

(2005/C 277/09)

By letter dated 27 May 2002, the Icelandic Government notified the EFTA Surveillance Authority of a proposal to provide a guarantee to deCODE Genetics Inc. (US) in connection with a research and development project which the company intends to undertake in the field of biotechnology in Iceland.

In May 2002, the Icelandic Parliament authorised the Ministry of Finance to issue a guarantee to deCODE Genetics Inc. (US) in relation to a bond amounting to USD 200 million. The proceeds of the bond would be utilised to establish a new drug development department in Iceland and to finance several drug development programmes.

On 16 July 2003, the Authority initiated the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 1(2) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement in respect of the aid. The decision was published in the EEA Section of and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union
   (1).

Official Journal of the European Union

1

By letter dated 14 April 2004, Iceland withdrew the above notification.

As the Icelandic authorities have withdrawn the notification and do not intend to grant the aid notified, the Authority has decided to close the proceedings initiated under Article 1(2) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.

---

(1)  OJ C 308, 18.12.2003, p. 22 and EEA Supplements to the Official Journal of the European Union No 63, p. 10 of the same date.

1

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### § 1261.20 Definitions.

As used in this subpart C:

*Compensation* means any payment of money or the provision of any other thing of current or potential value in connection with service as a director. Compensation includes all direct and indirect payments of benefits, both cash and non-cash, granted to or for the benefit of any director.

*Expenses* means necessary and reasonable travel, subsistence and other related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of official duties as are payable to senior officers of the Bank under the Bank's travel policy, except gift or entertainment expenses.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole Receiver for Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B., Louisville, Kentucky (OTS No. 16835), on September 18, 2009.

Dated: October 2, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-24285 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BRUCE RHYNE AND JANICE RHYNE, 

H/W,

Petitioners

v.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION 

SUNOCO, INC. (R&M) F/K/A SUN 

COMPANY, INC. AND F/K/A SUN OIL 

COMPANY, INC. RADIATOR SPECIALTY 

COMPANY EXXONMOBIL 

CORPORATION CHEVRON USA, INC. 

AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO GULF 

OIL COMPANY SAFETY-KLEEN 

SYSTEMS, INC., CRC INDUSTRIES, INC. 

UNIVAR USA, INC. F/K/A 

CHEMCENTRAL CORP., AND VAN 

WATERS & RODGERS, INC. ASHLAND, 

INC. KANO LABORATORIES, INC. THE 

STECO CORPORATION ACUITY 

SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. 

THE SAVOGRAN COMPANY TURTLE 

WAX, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MARVEL 

OIL COMPANY INC.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
HomeResources – Office of Overseas Schools...Homeschooling Information

# 									Homeschooling Information							

Office of Overseas Schools

February 1, 2022

**Homeschooling Resources in the Department of State**
        - Homeschooling and Online Education  – GCLO Education and Youth Team webpage where you will find information on getting started, homeschool curriculum programs, online college programs, homeschooling resources, education consultants, and homeschooling in the Washington D.C. area.
        - **Before**  choosing the homeschool option, families living abroad should check the legality of homeschooling in their host country. The Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) tracks the status on homeschooling worldwide.  Visit HSLDA International for more information .
        - GCLO Homeschooling FAQs
        - Department of State Standardized Regulations – DSSR 277.3 Home Study/Private Instruction Allowance
        - Office of Allowances Home Study/Private Instruction FAQs

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK, GENERAL TERM,

MAY, 1900.

#### Edward A. Parmele et al., Respondents, *v.*The Pulvola Chemical Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment directed by the court in favor of plaintiffs.

*819McElheny & Bennett (William M. Bennett, of counsel), for-appellant.

A. A. Mitchell, for respondents.

Fitzsimosts, Ch. J.

We have .examined with care the appeal record, and in our opinion it discloses that no actual or constructive eviction occurred. It also appears to us that the premises demised, at no time during their occupancy, were untenantable. All of the evil, unpleasant and probably odorous conditions complained of, were due to the fact that defendant and its subtenants had by their careless conduct brought them about. The alleged defection and bad condition of the plumbing work and cesspool might and could have been easily remedied, if defendant and his tenant had so desired; but apparently they were seeking for some cause that would justify them in vacating the premises, and declaring that such causes rendered the premises untenantable, thus constituting a constructive eviction. The objections complained of could have been easily remedied, the plumbing work repaired and cesspools cleaned and the reasonable expenses thereof charged against the landlord and deducted from the rent, because of his covenants to make all such repairs. They were simple, ordinary repairs and were not, as defendant contends, permanent or substantial repairs, and did not justify defendant in vacating the premises, because not done by plaintiffs.

It was proper for the trial justice to exclude the evidence offered by defendant to sustain his alleged counterclaim. That claim was based solely upon the theory that defendant and his tenants were evicted. As pointed out by us, no eviction occurred and, therefore, no damage could have occurred to defendant upon that score. Besides, we think, that the evidence shows, that the plaintiffs offered to do all repairs reasonably required, if defendant would name them. This it declined to do. When invited by plaintiffs to name them, or accompany him to the premises and point out the objectionable features, it again refused. The actions of defendant in this regard were capricious and unjust, and in harmony with its entire conduct in this matter.

We can find nothing in the record that would justify us in aiding defendant in its scheme.

SoHUCHMArr, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.