alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<CURRENCY>    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                              65                      94
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,650                  45,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,661                   1,116
<INVENTORY>                                     30,989                  21,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,732                  66,051
<PP&E>                                           9,998                   5,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,883                   4,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,096                  67,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,480                  32,907
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           273                     272
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,093                  21,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,096                  67,332
<SALES>                                         40,677                  53,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,677                  53,212
<CGS>                                           32,746                  38,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,049                  48,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 562                     565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (934)                   4,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2                      88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (936)                   4,315
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (936)                   4,315
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)                     .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                     .16




</TABLE>
# C_2006045EN.01001701.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/17

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2006/C 45/13)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that the notified measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 47663

Title: Notification of the sale of land adjacent to the National Library, Oslo, Norway

Objective: Sale of plot of land adjacent to Nasjonalbiblioteket, from the University of Oslo to Entra Eiendom AS

Legal basis: Article 61 EEA

---
eAcceleration Corp.
                 Acceleration Software International Corporation
                             1223 NW Finn Hill Road
                            Poulsbo, Washington 98370

                                                   June 30, 2000

Shane H. Traveller
c/o Trimedyne
2801 Barranca Road
Irvine, California 92606

          Re:  Severance, Settlement and General Release Agreement
               dated as of February 9, 2000 among eAcceleration Corp.,
               Acceleration Software International Corporation ("ASIC")
               and you (the "Severance Agreement")
               --------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Traveller:

     This letter confirms the following:

     1. Paragraph 3(d) of the Severance Agreement is hereby amended to
        increase  the  payment  set forth in such  paragraph  from  $17,000 to
        $22,300.

     2. Paragraph 3(e) of the Severance Agreement is hereby amended to
        increase the exercise  price per share of ASIC common stock from $2.39
        to $2.655 (equivalent to $5.31 per share of eAcceleration Corp. common
        stock).

     3. Except as specifically  set forth above,  all of the terms and
        provisions set forth in the Severance  Agreement  shall remain in full
        force and effect.



<PAGE>


     If the  foregoing  accurately  sets forth your  understanding,  please sign
where indicated below.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           EACCELERATION CORP.

                                           ACCELERATION SOFTWARE
                                           INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                          By:  /s/ Clint Ballard
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Clint Ballard
                                             President

Accepted and agreed as of
the date first above written:

/s/ Shane H. Traveller
--------------------------
Shane H. Traveller
#### Georgiana C. Carpenter, Respondent, *v.*Robert L. Turk, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan.

E. H. Murphy, for appellant:

G. W. Galinger, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

On December twelfth the plaintiff wrote defendant in substance, Exhibit F, that she believed that the balance due her on her account was fourteen dollars and fifty cents; this was in substance a statement by her memory of the account as it was on the date referred to. Upon the trial plaintiff failed, though interrogated about it, to explain the letter. In February, defendant sent plaintiff twenty-five dollars, and satisfactorily explained why he sent it. In view of the evidence referred to the judgment should have been in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff certainly did not prove her case by a fair preponderance of evidence.

I believe that the judgment should be reversed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., and Dugro, J.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.2

BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |   |                                                                                                                      
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |   |                                                                                                                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 05, 2008

/s/ Barton Heminover
Barton Heminover
Chief Financial Officer


---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2134EM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Donald Pinnell, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: December 14, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Donald Pinnell of possession with intent to distribute

methamphetamine and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The district court

sentenced Pinnell to 156 months in prison. Pinnell appeals his convictions and

sentence, and we affirm.

First, Pinnell contends the evidence does not support his conspiracy conviction.

We disagree. Two of Pinnell’s coconspirators testified they supplied Pinnell quantities

of methamphetamine for distribution, discussed methamphetamine shipments, and

agreed how to divide a methamphetamine shipment. Having reviewed the evidence in
-2-

the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists from

which a reasonable jury could find Pinnell guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of

conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. See United States v. McCracken, 110 F.3d

535, 540 (8th Cir. 1997). We also reject Pinnell’s other evidentiary challenges.

Contrary to Pinnell’s view, the evidence established Pinnell’s participation in the

conspiracy, thus the district court properly admitted the testimony of Pinnell’s

coconspirators. See United States v. Escobar, 50 F.3d 1414, 1423 (8th Cir. 1995); Fed.

R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). Also, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it

admitted evidence of Pinnell’s earlier methamphetamine-distribution activities because

the Government’s evidence satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence

404(b), and the evidence was more probative than prejudicial. See United States v.

Lyon, 959 F.2d 701, 706 (8th Cir. 1992). 

 

Next, we reject Pinnell’s challenge to his sentence because the record shows the

district court correctly calculated Pinnell’s guideline sentence by attributing to him the

amount of the conspiracy’s methamphetamine that was reasonably foreseeable. See

United States v. Brown, 148 F.3d 1003, 1008 (8th Cir. 1998). Finally, Pinnell’s

argument that the district court improperly admitted coconspirator testimony exchanged

for the Government’s promise of reduced sentences or immunity is foreclosed by the

holdings of this court. See United States v. Payne, 940 F.2d 286, 290-91 (8th Cir.

1991). 

We affirm Pinnell’s convictions and sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 150.620 May I receive compensation for acting in exempt fiduciary capacities?

You may receive reasonable compensation.
#### § 217.61 Purpose and scope.

Sections 217.61 through 217.63 of this subpart establish public disclosure requirements related to the capital requirements described in subpart B of this part for a Board-regulated institution with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more as reported on the Board-regulated institution's most recent year-end Call Report, for a state member bank, or FR Y-9C, for a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company, as applicable that is not an advanced approaches Board-regulated institution making public disclosures pursuant to § 217.172. An advanced approaches Board-regulated institution that has not received approval from the Board to exit parallel run pursuant to § 217.121(d) is subject to the disclosure requirements described in §§ 217.62 and 217.63. A Board-regulated institution with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more as reported on the Board-regulated institution's most recent year-end Call Report, for a state member bank, or FR Y-9C, for a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company, as applicable, that is not an advanced approaches Board-regulated institution making public disclosures subject to § 217.172 must comply with § 217.62 unless it is a consolidated subsidiary of a bank holding company, savings and loan holding company, or depository institution that is subject to the disclosure requirements of § 217.62 or a subsidiary of a non-U.S. banking organization that is subject to comparable public disclosure requirements in its home jurisdiction. For purposes of this section, total consolidated assets are determined based on the average of the Board-regulated institution's total consolidated assets in the four most recent quarters as reported on the Call Report, for a state member bank, or FR Y-9C, for a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company, as applicable; or the average of the Board-regulated institution's total consolidated assets in the most recent consecutive quarters as reported quarterly on the Board-regulated institution's Call Report, for a state member bank, or FR Y-9C, for a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company, as applicable if the Board-regulated institution has not filed such a report for each of the most recent four quarters.

[Reg. Q, 84 FR 35266, July 22, 2019]
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building and United States 

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 281 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building 

5 and United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tony 

11 Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

By MARTHA C. MORRISON, 

Deputy Clerk.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 22, 2005
    
    /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A Kruger, Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 22, 2005
    
    /s/ Glenn A. JacksonGlenn A. Jackson, Chief Accounting Officer
§ 150.580 When may I conduct fiduciary activities without obtaining OCC approval? Subject to the requirements of this subpart E, you do not need OCC approval under subpart B if you conduct fiduciary activities in the following fiduciary capacities: ( a ) Trustee of a trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan qualifying for specific tax treatment under section 401(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 401(d)).
( b ) Trustee or custodian of a Individual Retirement Account within the meaning of section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 408(a)).
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
      333-106389, No. 333-127089 and No. 333-127090 on Form S-8 and No. 333-119646,
      No. 333-125051, and No. 333-126460 on Form S-3 of Calypte Biomedical Corporation
      of our report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial
      statements of Calypte Biomedical Corporation (which report expresses an
      unqualified opinion and includes a matter of emphasis paragraph relating to
      the
      Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) included in this Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.




/s/  Odenberg,
      Ullakko, Muranishi & Co. LLP




San
      Francisco, California


March
      30,
      2007
- 257 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports DICK v . KOSKI PROF. GROUP Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff,

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland &

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, appellee and cross-appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., for appellant. Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick. Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.
Heavican , C.J., Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam

. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/16/2021 08:08 AM CDT- 258 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports DICK v . KOSKI PROF. GROUP Cite as 308 Neb. 257 concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group , 307 Neb. 599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020). We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows: (1) In the background section, under the subheading

“ Peremptory Challenges ,” we withdraw the last sentence of the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental tran

script, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in the appellate record.” (2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “ Peremptory Challenges ( Assignment of Error No . 1),” we withdraw the seventh paragraph and substitute the following: We do not decide that question here. While KPG has offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the record is insufficient to support its assignment of error even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Miller-Lerman , J., not participating.
# C_2023189EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 189/01)

Last publication

OJ C 179, 22.5.2023

Past publications

OJ C 173, 15.5.2023

OJ C 164, 8.5.2023

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023

OJ C 134, 17.4.2023

OJ C 127, 11.4.2023

OJ C 121, 3.4.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23614]



[[Page 50218]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B 
Subcommittee.
    Date: October 14, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Allerton Hotel, 701 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, 
IL 60611.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-3528, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#385f55090a4f78565150165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3d4de8281c4f3dddadb9dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; MIP V.
    Date: November 2-3, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activites, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 3129, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-3564, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ffafcaea8e8dff1f6f7b1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f3a3c6e68281f31363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23614 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>