alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                      BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 12, 2003

                                     /s/ Barton Heminover
                                     --------------------------------
                                     Barton Heminover
                                     Chief Financial Officer




                                       25
§ 192.335 Procedures for the sale of conversion shares. ( a ) *Distribution of order forms.* A savings association must distribute order forms to all eligible account holders, supplemental eligible account holders, and other voting members to enable them to subscribe for the conversion shares they are permitted under the plan of conversion. The savings association may either send the order forms with its offering circular or after the savings association distributes its offering circular.
( b ) *Sale of shares.* A savings association may sell its conversion shares in a community offering, a public offering, or both. The savings association may begin the community offering, the public offering, or both at any time during the subscription offering or upon conclusion of the subscription offering.
( c ) *Underwriting commissions and fees.* A savings association may pay underwriting commissions (including underwriting discounts). The appropriate Federal banking agency may object to the payment of unreasonable commissions. The savings association may reimburse an underwriter for accountable expenses in a subscription offering if the public offering is limited. If no public offering occurs, the savings association may pay an underwriter a consulting fee. The appropriate Federal banking agency may object to the payment of unreasonable consulting fees.
( d ) *Sequence of order fulfillment.* If a savings association conducts the community offering, the public offering, or both at the same time as the subscription offering, the savings association must fill all subscription orders first.
( e ) *Preparation of order form.* A savings association must prepare its order form in compliance with this part and Form OF.
x10a2-q12015






Exhibit 10(a)2




BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


THE SOUTHERN COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2015, unless otherwise noted, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Southern Company (the “Company”) and certain other executive officers of the Company who served during 2014.




	
		
	Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


	$1,250,000

	Art P. Beattie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


	$700,438

	W. Paul Bowers
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power Company


	$814,895

	Kimberly S. Greene
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer


	$666,250

	Stephen E. Kuczynski
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Southern Nuclear Operating Company


	$708,496

	Charles D. McCrary*
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power Company


	$803,247








		
	*
	Retired May 1, 2014.  Salary shown was Mr. McCrary’s salary effective March 1, 2014.
427 A.2d 246

#### Smith v. Ingwersen et vir., Appellants.

Argued November 13, 1979.

Floyd L. Arbo-gast Jr., for appellants;

Bruno A. Muscatello, submitted a brief on behalf of appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and CAVANAUGH, JJ.

The order of the trial court dated October 23, 1978, is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential Securities Aggressive
                    Growth Fund LP and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<CIK>               0000899174
<NAME>              Prudential Securities Aggressive Growth Fund LP
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,811,247

<SECURITIES>                    5,166,390

<RECEIVABLES>                   1,341

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,978,978

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,978,978

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           686,013

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      6,292,965

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,978,978

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                805,913

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,007,879

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (201,966)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (2.44)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### § 1041.14 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
#### Lulu Richardson, Respondent, *v.*Albert Borrill, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

William Henry Knox, for appellant.

G. A. C. Barnett, for respondent.

*719
      *Per Curiam.*

In view of the receipt of August eleventh (Defendant’s Exhibit B), the conflict between the statements of the witness M. H. Barton and her signatures, the improbability of the truth of the plaintiff’s evidence that she did not know of the sale by her mother in August, and the fact that it does not appear that plaintiff made any claim until December, the defendant should have prevailed.

The value of the property in question was fixed by the judgment at $100, although there was no evidence of value.

For the reasons assigned the judgment will be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., and Dugro, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2642 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2642

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Procion Yellow H-EXL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2003

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Procion Yellow H-EXL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON PROCION YELLOW H-EXL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.32.46 and inserting the following:

      

``      9902.32.46       Mixture of 1,5-      Free       No change        No change        On or before 12/
                          Naphthalenedisulfo                                                31/2008           ''
                          nic acid, 3,3-((3-                                                                   .
                          methyl (CAS No.
                          72906-24-2) and
                          the 4-methyl
                          compound -1,2-
                          phyenylene)bis(imi
                          no(6-chloro-1,3,5-
                          triazine-4,2-
                          diyl)imino(2-
                          (acetylamino)-5-
                          methoxy-4,1-
                          phenylene)azo))bis-
                          , tetrasodium salt
                          (CAS No. 72906-25-
                          3) (the foregoing
                          provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.16.30).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50282 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ROMELIA MENDOZA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11

- CR

- 763

- 5

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Romelia Mendoza

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza h a s not filed a response. W e have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
October 18 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50282 Document: 00513722566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 16

- 50282

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRA NTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50282 Document: 00513722566 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
#### ANGLIN V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 23, 1913.)

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 1261.6 Determination of member votes. ( a ) *In general.* Each Bank shall determine, in accordance with this section, the number of votes that each member of the Bank may cast for each directorship that is to be filled by the vote of the members.
( b ) *Number of votes.* For each member directorship and each independent directorship that is to be filled in an election, each member shall be entitled to cast one vote for each share of Bank stock that the member was required to hold as of the record date. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the number of votes that any member may cast for any one directorship shall not exceed the average number of shares of Bank stock required to be held as of the record date by all members located in the same State as of the record date. If a Bank has issued more than one class of stock, it shall calculate the average number of shares separately for each class of stock, using the total number of members in a State as the denominator, and shall apply those limits separately in determining the maximum number of votes that any member owning that class of stock may cast in the election. The number of shares of Bank stock that a member was required to hold as of the record date shall be determined in accordance with the minimum investment requirement established by the Bank's capital plan.
( c ) *Voting preferences.* If the board of directors of a Bank includes any voting preferences as part of its approved capital plan, those preferences shall supersede the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section that otherwise would allow a member to cast one vote for each share of Bank stock it was required to hold as of the record date. If a Bank establishes a voting preference for a class of stock, the members with voting rights shall remain subject to the provisions of section 7(b) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1427(b)) that prohibit any member from casting any vote in excess of the average number of shares of stock required to be held by all members in its state.
[73 FR 55715, Sept. 26, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 51461, Oct. 7, 2009. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 17039, Apr. 5, 2010; 81 FR 76296, Nov. 2, 2016]
EXHIBIT 99.2
        TO CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. REPORT ON FORM 10Q
                           FEBRUARY 28, 2003
            CERTIFICATION BY KEVIN J. MCANDREW PURSUANT TO
       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Canterbury Consulting
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
February 28, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") accompanying this
certification fully complies with the requirements of the Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. The foregoing certification is
incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used
for any other purpose.


                             /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew
                             -----------------------
                             Kevin J. McAndrew
                             Chief Financial Officer


Dated:   April 11, 2003
# C_2010332EN.01001001.xml

| 9.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/10

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 332/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 15 September 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68546 |
| Decision number | : | 348/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | CLIMIT/Gassnova aid scheme |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3) EEA and the R&D&I Guidelines |
| Objective | : | R&D&I |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Gassnova SF |
| Dokkveien 10 |
| 9320 Porsgrunn |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

15 September 2010

Case number

:

68546

Decision number

:

348/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

CLIMIT/Gassnova aid scheme

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3) EEA and the R&D&I Guidelines

Objective

:

R&D&I

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Gassnova SF

Dokkveien 10

9320 Porsgrunn

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 222.91 Duties of card issuers regarding changes of address. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to a person described in § 222.90(a) that issues a debit or credit card (card issuer).
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Cardholder* means a consumer who has been issued a credit or debit card.
( 2 ) *Clear and conspicuous* means reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information presented.
( c ) *Address validation requirements.* A card issuer must establish and implement reasonable policies and procedures to assess the validity of a change of address if it receives notification of a change of address for a consumer's debit or credit card account and, within a short period of time afterwards (during at least the first 30 days after it receives such notification), the card issuer receives a request for an additional or replacement card for the same account. Under these circumstances, the card issuer may not issue an additional or replacement card, until, in accordance with its reasonable policies and procedures and for the purpose of assessing the validity of the change of address, the card issuer: ( 1 ) ( i ) Notifies the cardholder of the request: ( A ) At the cardholder's former address; or
( B ) By any other means of communication that the card issuer and the cardholder have previously agreed to use; and
( ii ) Provides to the cardholder a reasonable means of promptly reporting incorrect address changes; or
( 2 ) Otherwise assesses the validity of the change of address in accordance with the policies and procedures the card issuer has established pursuant to § 222.90 of this part.
( d ) *Alternative timing of address validation.* A card issuer may satisfy the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section if it validates an address pursuant to the methods in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section when it receives an address change notification, before it receives a request for an additional or replacement card.
( e ) *Form of notice.* Any written or electronic notice that the card issuer provides under this paragraph must be clear and conspicuous and provided separately from its regular correspondence with the cardholder.
# C_2015193EN.01000601.xml

| 11.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2015/C 193/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 4 February 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 76531 |
| Decision number | : | 37/15/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Individual aid in favour of Hydro Aluminium AS for the construction of the Karmøy demonstration plant |
| Legal basis | : | The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid under the Energy Fund scheme, subject to a detailed assessment |
| Objective | : | Promotion of new energy technology |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | Overall budget: NOK 1 486 million |
| Duration | : | Until 2017 |
| Economic sectors | : | Primary aluminium, aluminium smelting cell technology |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova Professor |
| Borchsgt. 2 |
| N-7030 Trondheim |
| Norway |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

4 February 2015

Case number

Case number

:

76531

Decision number

Decision number

:

37/15/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Individual aid in favour of Hydro Aluminium AS for the construction of the Karmøy demonstration plant

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Individual aid under the Energy Fund scheme, subject to a detailed assessment

Objective

Objective

:

Promotion of new energy technology

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

Budget

:

Overall budget: NOK 1 486 million

Duration

Duration

:

Until 2017

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Primary aluminium, aluminium smelting cell technology

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova Professor

Borchsgt. 2

N-7030 Trondheim

Norway

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### Samuel Sabinson, Respondent, *v.*Peter Herter, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

Hirsh *&*Ehrhorn, for appellant.

Louis Levy, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The pretended oral release by the defendant is without- evidence to support it, and it was clearly erroneous to exclude testimony tending to establish any of the items of the counterclaim.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.