alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:34 a.m. on Tuesday, September 29, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), seconded by Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), concurred in by Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: September 29, 2009.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-23814 Filed 9-29-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.753 Public Health Service. Disability compensation may be paid concurrently with retirement pay to an officer of the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service, who was receiving disability compensation on December 31, 1956, as follows: ( a ) An officer who incurred a disability before July 29, 1945, but retired for nondisability purposes prior to such date.
( b ) An officer who incurred a disability before July 29, 1945, but retired for nondisability purposes between July 4, 1952, and December 31, 1956.
( c ) An officer who incurred a disability between July 29, 1945, and July 3, 1952, but retired for nondisability purposes between July 4, 1952, and December 31, 1956.
[26 FR 1604, Feb. 24, 1961]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1


Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

August 12, 2002

Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc.
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77002

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) and
subsidiaries (the "Company") for the three and nine-month periods ended June 30,
2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated August 12, 2002; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30917 for the
Company on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-52795 for the Company
on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
§ 218.740 Defined terms relating to the sweep accounts exception from the definition of “broker.” For purposes of section 3(a)(4)(B)(v) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)(B)(v)), the following terms shall have the meaning provided: ( a ) *Deferred sales load* has the same meaning as in 17 CFR 270.6c-10.
( b ) *Money market fund* means an open-end company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 *et seq.*) that is regulated as a money market fund pursuant to 17 CFR 270.2a-7.
( c ) ( 1 ) *No-load* , in the context of an investment company or the securities issued by an investment company, means, for securities of the class or series in which a bank effects transactions, that: ( i ) That class or series is not subject to a sales load or a deferred sales load; and
( ii ) Total charges against net assets of that class or series of the investment company's securities for sales or sales promotion expenses, for personal service, or for the maintenance of shareholder accounts do not exceed 0.25 of 1% of average net assets annually.
( 2 ) For purposes of this definition, charges for the following will not be considered charges against net assets of a class or series of an investment company's securities for sales or sales promotion expenses, for personal service, or for the maintenance of shareholder accounts: ( i ) Providing transfer agent or sub-transfer agent services for beneficial owners of investment company shares;
( ii ) Aggregating and processing purchase and redemption orders for investment company shares;
( iii ) Providing beneficial owners with account statements showing their purchases, sales, and positions in the investment company;
( iv ) Processing dividend payments for the investment company;
( v ) Providing sub-accounting services to the investment company for shares held beneficially;
( vi ) Forwarding communications from the investment company to the beneficial owners, including proxies, shareholder reports, dividend and tax notices, and updated prospectuses; or
( vii ) Receiving, tabulating, and transmitting proxies executed by beneficial owners of investment company shares.
( d ) *Open-end company* has the same meaning as in section 5(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(1)).
( e ) *Sales load* has the same meaning as in section 2(a)(35) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(35)).
# C_2017123EN.01000801.xml

| 20.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/8

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Borgarting lagmannsrett dated 27 September 2016 in the case of Yara International ASA v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Finance

(Case E-15/16)

(2017/C 123/09)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 27 September 2016 from Borgarting lagmannsrett (Borgarting Court of Appeal), which was received at the Court Registry on 4 October 2016, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Yara International ASA v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Finance on the following question:

Is it compatible with Articles 31 and 34 EEA that national rules on intra-group contributions, such as the rules in the Norwegian Taxation Act, under which the contribution reduces the transferor’s taxable income and is included in the recipient’s taxable income regardless of whether the recipient makes a loss or a profit for tax purposes, lay down the condition that both the transferor and the recipient are liable to taxation in the EEA State in question, or must the EEA rules be interpreted to mean that, on certain conditions, an exception must be granted from the requirement for tax liability in the realm?

---
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60098

Summary Calendar

 

VILMA REYES BUSTILLO,

 Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

 Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 134 333

--------------------

Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Vilma Reyes Bustillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ affirmance of the immigration judge’s denial of her

applications for political asylum and withholding of deportation.

Bustillo argues that the evidence was sufficient to support a

finding of past persecution and a well-founded fear of persecution

based on her political affiliation. 
2

When, as in this case, the Board of Immigration Appeals adopts

without opinion the immigration judge’s decision, this court

reviews the immigration judge’s decision. Mikhael v. INS, 115

F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Here, the immigration judge’s

determination that Bustillo had not shown past persecution or a

well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to El Salvador

was supported by substantial evidence. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293

F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002); Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d

194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Bustillo’s petition for review is

DENIED.
§ 1222.23 Appraisal management company registration. Each State electing to register AMCs pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section must: ( a ) Establish and maintain within the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency a licensing program that is subject to the limitations set forth in § 1222.24 and with the legal authority and mechanisms to: ( 1 ) Review and approve or deny an AMC's application for initial registration;
( 2 ) Review and renew or review and deny an AMC's registration periodically;
( 3 ) Examine the books and records of an AMC operating in the State and require the AMC to submit reports, information, and documents;
( 4 ) Verify that the appraisers on the AMC's panel hold valid State certifications or licenses, as applicable;
( 5 ) Conduct investigations of AMCs to assess potential violations of applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders;
( 6 ) Discipline, suspend, terminate, or deny renewal of the registration of an AMC that violates applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders; and
( 7 ) Report an AMC's violation of applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders, as well as disciplinary and enforcement actions and other relevant information about an AMC's operations, to the Appraisal Subcommittee.
( b ) Impose requirements on AMCs that are not owned and controlled by an insured depository institution and not regulated by a Federal financial institutions regulatory agency to: ( 1 ) Register with and be subject to supervision by the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency;
( 2 ) Engage only State-certified or State-licensed appraisers for Federally related transactions in conformity with any Federally related transaction regulations;
( 3 ) Establish and comply with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC, in engaging an appraiser, selects an appraiser who is independent of the transaction and who has the requisite education, expertise, and experience necessary to competently complete the appraisal assignment for the particular market and property type;
( 4 ) Direct the appraiser to perform the assignment in accordance with USPAP; and
( 5 ) Establish and comply with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC conducts its appraisal management services in accordance with the requirements of section 129E(a)-(i) of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1639e(a)-(i), and regulations thereunder.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.2


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                       TO

                          FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM AGREEMENT
                          ----------------------------

THIS AMENDMENT (the "AMENDMENT") is entered into as of May 5, 2000, by and
between PF.Net Corp., a Delaware corporation ("BUILDER") and AT&T Corp., a New
York corporation ("AT&T").

WHEREAS, Builder and AT&T entered into a Fiber Optic System Agreement, dated as
of October 29, 1999 (the "CONTRACT"; capitalized terms used herein without
definition having the meanings given to such terms in the Contract).

WHEREAS, both Builder and AT&T desire to amend Article 29 of the Contract in
order to modify the covenants that require John Warta and Stephen Irwin
(collectively, the "MANAGERS") to exercise primary management direction and
control of the activities associated with the construction of the AT&T System.

WHEREAS, Section 30 of the Contract provides that the consent of Builder and
AT&T shall be required for any modification of the provisions of the Contract.

NOW THEREFORE, the following amendments are hereby made to the Contract:

   Section 1.   Section 29.4 of the Contract is hereby replaced in its entirety
with the following:

     "If Thomas R. McCaleb ceases to exercise primary management direction and
control of the activities associated with the construction of the AT&T System
at any time before 31 December 2001, Builder's Board of Directors may propose a
qualified successor candidate for whom AT&T will not unreasonably withhold
approval. AT&T shall notify Builder of its determination within 10 days of
receipt of notice of the proposed successor. If Builder engages a successor who
is not reasonably acceptable to AT&T, such action by Builder shall constitute a
material breach of this Contract. The foregoing shall apply to any further
successors to such position."

     Section 2.  Section 29.5 of the Contract is hereby replaced in its entirety
with the following:

         "[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]."


<PAGE>



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AT&T and Builder have executed this Amendment as of the date
first referenced above.

                             AT&T CORP.

                             By:      /S/ STEPHEN R. ALLEN
                              ------------------------------
                             Name:  Stephen R. Allen
                             Title:    Division Manager

                             PF.NET CORP.
                             By:      /S/  MUZZAFAR MIRZA
                             ------------------------------
                             Name:  Muzzafar Mirza
                             Title:    Chairman of the Board
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2879 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2879

    To repeal the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2003

Mr. Michaud (for himself, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Grijalva, 
    Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Lee, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Peterson of 
 Minnesota, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. 
Sanders, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Stupak, and Mrs. Jones of Ohio) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF BIPARTISAN TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY ACT OF 2002.

    (a) Repeal.--Division B of the Trade Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 3801 et 
seq.), and the items relating to that division in the table of contents 
for that Act, are repealed.
    (b) Amendments.--The amendments made by section 2110 of the 
Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002, as enacted, shall 
cease to be effective on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 308.24 Scope of document discovery. ( a ) *Limits on discovery.* ( 1 ) Subject to the limitations set out in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a party to a proceeding under this subpart may obtain document discovery by serving a written request to produce documents. For purposes of a request to produce documents, the term *documents* includes writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, recordings, electronically stored information, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained either directly or, if necessary, after translation by the responding party, into a reasonably usable form.
( 2 ) Discovery by use of deposition is governed by subpart B of this part.
( 3 ) Discovery by use of either interrogatories or requests for admission is not permitted.
( 4 ) Any request to produce documents that calls for irrelevant material; or that is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, unduly burdensome, or repetitive of previous requests, or that seeks to obtain privileged documents will be denied or modified. A request is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, or unduly burdensome if, among other things, it fails to include justifiable limitations on the time period covered and the geographic locations to be searched, or the time provided to respond in the request is inadequate.
( b ) *Relevance.* A party may obtain document discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that has material relevance to the merits of the pending action.
( c ) *Privileged matter.* Privileged documents are not discoverable. Privileges include the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, bank examination privilege, law enforcement privilege, any government's or government agency's deliberative process privilege, and any other privileges the Constitution, any applicable act of Congress, or the principles of common law provide.
( d ) *Time limits.* All document discovery, including all responses to discovery requests, must be completed by the date set by the ALJ and no later than 30 days prior to the date scheduled for the commencement of the hearing, except as provided in the Local Rules. No exceptions to this time limit are permitted, unless the ALJ finds on the record that good cause exists for waiving the requirements of this paragraph (d).
----

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the                Report. |

|                                  |       |                                 |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Date: November                9, 2006 | By:   |  /s/              Francis J. Tarallo |
|                                       |            | Francis                J. Tarallo         |
|                                       |            | Chief                Financial Officer    |
#### § 1263.22 Annual calculation of stock holdings.

A Bank shall calculate annually each member's required minimum holdings of Bank stock using calendar year-end financial data provided by the member to the Bank, pursuant to § 1263.31(d), and shall notify each member of the result. The notice shall clearly state that the Bank's calculation of each member's minimum stock holdings is to be used to determine the number of votes that the member may cast in that year's election of directors and shall identify the State within the district in which the member will vote. A member that does not agree with the Bank's calculation of the minimum stock purchase requirement or with the identification of its voting State may request FHFA to review the Bank's determination. FHFA shall promptly determine the member's minimum required holdings and its proper voting State, which determination shall be final.