alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-Q for The Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane
Investment Corporation, the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund. L.P.,
that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the fnancial condition and results of operations of The Willowbridge
Fund L.P. for the period in question.



/s/ Robert L. Lerner
----------------------
Robert L. Lerner
President
Ruvane Investment Corporation, the general
partner of The Willowbridge Fund, L.P.
#### § 269b.510 Review by panel.

The panel shall review the report and recommendations of each hearing officer, the record of the hearing, and such other documents as enumerated in § 269b.450, whether or not any party files an appeal, unless the parties file with the panel a settlement agreement within 10 days after service of the hearing officer's report upon them. In the course of such review, the panel may require oral argument or written briefs on any relevant issue within such time limits as the panel may prescribe, and may reopen the record in any case and receive further evidence.
§ 1291.32 Use of AHP subsidy in loan pools. Pursuant to written policies established by a Bank's board of directors after consultation with its Advisory Council, a Bank, in its discretion, may provide AHP subsidy under its General Fund or any Targeted Funds for the origination of first mortgage or rehabilitation loans with subsidized interest rates to AHP-eligible households through a purchase commitment by an entity that will purchase and pool the loans, provided the following requirements are met: ( a ) *Eligibility requirements.* The loan pool sponsor's use of the AHP subsidies shall meet the requirements under this section, and shall not be used for the purpose of providing liquidity to the originator or holder of the loans, or paying the loan pool's operating or secondary market transaction costs.
( b ) *Forward commitment.* ( 1 ) The loan pool sponsor shall purchase the loans pursuant to a forward commitment that identifies the loans to be originated with interest-rate reductions as specified in the approved application for AHP subsidy to households with incomes at or below 80 percent of the median income for the area. Both initial purchases of loans for the AHP loan pool and subsequent purchases of loans to substitute for repaid loans in the pool shall be made pursuant to the terms of such forward commitment and subject to time limits on the use of the AHP subsidy as specified by the Bank in its AHP Implementation Plan and the Bank's agreement with the loan pool sponsor, which shall not exceed one year from the date of approval of the AHP application.
( 2 ) As an alternative to using a forward commitment, the loan pool sponsor may purchase an initial round of loans that were not originated pursuant to an AHP-specific forward commitment, provided that the entities from which the loans were purchased are required to use the proceeds from the initial loan purchases within time limits on the use of the AHP subsidy as specified by the Bank in its AHP Implementation Plan and the Bank's agreement with the loan pool sponsor, which shall not exceed one year from the date of approval of the AHP application. The proceeds shall be used by such entities to assist households that are income-eligible under the approved AHP application during subsequent rounds of lending, and such assistance shall be provided in the form of a below-market AHP-subsidized interest rate as specified in the approved AHP application.
( c ) Each AHP-assisted owner-occupied unit and rental project receiving AHP direct subsidy or a subsidized advance shall be subject to the requirements of §§ 1291.15, 1291.50, and 1291.60, respectively.
( d ) Where AHP direct subsidy is being used to buy down the interest rate of a loan or loans from a member or other party, the loan pool sponsor shall use the full amount of the AHP direct subsidy to buy down the interest rate on a permanent basis at the time of closing on such loan or loans.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2994

To amend the Small Business Act to prohibit the Administrator of the 

Small Business Administration from selling loans made by the Administrator under the disaster loan program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from selling 

loans made by the Administrator under the disaster loan 

program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF DISASTER LOANS. 

4 Section 4 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 633) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(g) PROHIBITION ON SALE OF DISASTER LOANS.—

7 The Administrator may not sell any portion of the Admin8 istration’s interest in, or the rights of the Administration 
2

•HR 2994 IH 

1 with respect to, any loan made directly or through imme2 diate participation under section 7(b), including by direct 

3 sale, through the sale of loan participations, or by includ4 ing such loans in a pool of assets for the purpose of selling 

5 asset-backed securities.’’.

Æ
No. 76-678.

#### Shell Oil Co. *v.*Dartt.

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 429 U. S. 1089.] Motion of Equal Employment Advisory Council for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
#### § 1805.403 Authority to sell.

The CDFI Fund may, at any time, sell its equity investments and loans, provided the CDFI Fund shall retain the authority to enforce the provisions of the Assistance Agreement until the performance goals specified therein have been met.
<PAGE>

11) Statement re: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    For the Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30
                                                           (Unaudited)
                                                 ------------        ------------
                                                     1997                1996
                                                 ------------        ------------
<S>                                              <C>                 <C>
Net Loss for Computing Earnings
   per Common Share                              $   (157,569)       $   (321,011)
                                                 ============        ============
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding during each period without
   dilution                                        45,074,702          24,922,588

Addition from assumed exercise of Common
   Stock Warrants                                   1,075,000           1,245,000

Addition from assumed conversion of
   Preferred Stock                                    300,000             300,000
                                                 ------------        ------------
                                                   45,634,702          26,467,588
                                                 ------------        ------------
                                                 ------------        ------------
Net Income Per Common Stock

   Without Dilution                              $      (0.00)       $      (0.01)

   Fully Diluted                                 $      (0.00)       $      (0.01)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calypte Biomedical Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  November 11, 2011
 /s/ Adel KarasAdel KarasPresident, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer (Principal Executive andPrincipal Financial Officer)
§ 308.113 Answer to notice of disapproval. ( a ) *Contents.* ( 1 ) An answer to the notice of disapproval of a proposed acquisition of control shall be filed within 20 days after service of the notice of disapproval and shall specifically deny those portions of the notice of disapproval which are disputed. Those portions of the notice of disapproval which are not specifically denied are deemed admitted by the applicant.
( 2 ) Any hearing under this subpart shall be limited to those parts of the notice of disapproval that are specifically denied.
( b ) *Failure to answer.* Failure of a respondent to file an answer required by this section within the time provided constitutes a waiver of his or her right to appear and contest the allegations in the notice of disapproval. If no timely answer is filed, Enforcement Counsel may file a motion for entry of an order of default. Upon a finding that no good cause has been shown for the failure to file a timely answer, the administrative law judge shall file a recommended decision containing the findings and relief sought in the notice. A final order issued by the Board of Directors based upon a respondent's failure to answer is deemed to be an order issued upon consent.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2721

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 to provide 

certain relief under that Act for members of the reserve components 

who are attending postsecondary educational institutions when called 

or ordered to active duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2003

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 

to provide certain relief under that Act for members 

of the reserve components who are attending postsecondary educational institutions when called or ordered 

to active duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF UNDER THE SOLDIERS’ AND SAILORS’ 

4 CIVIL RELIEF ACT OF 1940 RELATING TO STU5 DENT LOANS. 

6 Section 206 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief 

7 Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. 526) is amended—
2

•HR 2721 IH 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘No obligation’’; 

2 (2) by designating the second sentence as sub3 section (c); and 

4 (3) by inserting after subsection (a), as des5 ignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(b) Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to stu8 dent loans, including student loans under title IV of the 

9 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.), 

10 student loans under any other Federal student loan pro11 gram, or any other student loan.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2943 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2943

  To waive, for grants awarded in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, certain 
   restrictions on the hiring or rehiring of career law enforcement 
officers under the COPS grant program under Part Q of the Omnibus Crime 
     Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

Ms. Hooley of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To waive, for grants awarded in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, certain 
   restrictions on the hiring or rehiring of career law enforcement 
officers under the COPS grant program under Part Q of the Omnibus Crime 
     Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responders Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY WAIVER OF MATCHING FUNDS AND INCREASE IN MAXIMUM 
              GRANT FOR HIRING COSTS.

    (a) Waiver of Matching Funds.--Subsections (e) and (i) of section 
1701 of part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd) shall not apply to a covered COPS grant.
    (b) Increase in Maximum Grant for Hiring Costs.--Subsection (c) of 
section 1704 of such part (42 U.S.C. 3796dd-3) shall not apply to a 
covered COPS grant. Funding provided under a covered COPS grant for 
hiring or rehiring a career law enforcement officer may not exceed 
$150,000, unless the Attorney General grants a waiver from this 
limitation.
    (c) Waiver of Retention Requirement.--Paragraph (8) of section 
1702(c) of such part (42 U.S.C. 3796dd-1) shall not apply to a covered 
COPS grant. The Attorney General shall award covered COPS grants 
without regard to whether the applicant has any plans described in that 
paragraph.
    (d) Covered COPS Grant.--In this section, the term ``covered COPS 
grant'' means a grant under part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime 
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd et seq.) that is 
awarded in fiscal year 2004 or 2005, regardless of the period for which 
the grant is made.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTELA MARIA HERNANDEZ DE

MONTES,

Petitioner,

 v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 09-72065

Agency No. A075-304-149

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued July 12, 2017; Resubmitted August 22, 2017

San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and MARSHALL,**

 District

Judge.

 

Petitioner Estela Maria Hernandez De Montes petitions for review of an

order by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying Petitioner’s third motion to

reopen to reapply for asylum, for withholding of removal and relief under the

FILED

AUG 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, Senior United States District Judge

for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
Convention Against Torture, and to reapply for cancellation of removal (the

“Motion”). The Motion sought relief based on Petitioner’s husband’s then-existing

medical condition—“end stage renal failure awaiting availability of an organ

transplantation,” which “requires hemodialysis three (3) times per week.”

Petitioner’s husband has since received a kidney transplant. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Pilate v. Burrell (In re

Burrell), 415 F.3d 994, 998 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A case is moot if the issues presented

are no longer live and there fails to be a ‘case or controversy’ under Article III of

the Constitution.”); Pub. Utils. Comm’n v. FERC, 100 F.3d 1451, 1458 (9th Cir.

1996) (“The court must be able to grant effective relief, or it lacks jurisdiction and

must dismiss the appeal.”).

DISMISSED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         $21,685,191
<SECURITIES>                                     6,714,375
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,546,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                        53,773
<INVENTORY>                                        670,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,245,289
<PP&E>                                          49,109,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,222,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,428,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,781,240
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           293,862
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,428,448
<SALES>                                         28,123,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,123,740
<CGS>                                            7,786,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,427,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,697,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,032,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,665,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,665,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .35
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2714 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2714

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
              To reauthorize the State Justice Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Justice Institute 
Reauthorization Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 215 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10713) is amended to read as follows:

                   ``authorization of appropriations

    ``Sec. 215. There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
the purposes of this title, $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005, 
2006, 2007, and 2008. Amounts appropriated for each such year are to 
remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Status of Institute.--Section 205(c) of the State Justice 
Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(c)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Institute may purchase goods and services from the 
General Services Administration in order to carry out its functions.''.
    (b) Status as Officers and Employees of the United States.--Section 
205(d)(2) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10704(d)(2)) is amended by inserting ``, notwithstanding section 8914 
of such title'' after ``(relating to health insurance)''.
    (c) Meetings.--Section 204(j) of the State Justice Institute Act of 
1984 (42 U.S.C. 10703(j)) is amended by inserting ``(on any occasion on 
which that committee has been delegated the authority to act on behalf 
of the Board)'' after ``executive committee of the Board''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0919; FRL-9913-91-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
Conformity of General Federal Actions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the 
State of Texas on October 28, 2011. These revisions remove the State 
general conformity provisions from the SIP so that Federal rules will 
govern conformity of general Federal actions within the State of Texas. 
The revisions also update the narrative portion of the SIP. This action 
is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 18, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air 
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, (214) 665-8542, 
riley.jeffrey@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no relevant adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in 
response to this action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA 
receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this action should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 7, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-16825 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```