SPEC|ALT¥ CONSULT|NG, LTD. 

Air ua|i Test 

Emission Compliance Testing for HE HCI, and PM 

ACME Brick Company 

Sealy, Texas 

Tunnel Kiln Exhaust Stack 

NSR Permit Number 9540 and 40CFR63, Subpart JJJJJ 

Revision 1 

Prepared for: Mr. Jason Pence 

Acme Brick Company 

2821 West 7 th AStreet 

Ft. Worth, TX 76107 

(817) 870-8348 

Prepared by: Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. 

(281) 476- 9898 

Date Tested: 

Date Revised: 

April 12, 2006 

November 27, 20016 

931 Seaco Court = P.O. Box 1898. Deer Park, Texas 77536 

Phone: 281-476-9898. Fax: 281-476-9876. www.goldenspecialty.com 
Emission Compliance Testing for HE HCI, and PM 

ACME Brick 

Sealy, Texas 

Company 

Tunnel Kiln Exhaust Slack 

NSR Permit Number 9540 and 40CFR63, Subpart JJJJJ 

Revision 1 

Prepared for: Mr. Jason Pence 

Acme Brick Company 

2821 West 7 th AStreet 

Ft. Worth, TX 76107 

(817) 870-8348 

Prepared by: Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. 

(281) 476 9898 

Date Tested: 

Date Revised: 

April 12, 2006 

November 27, 2006 
Table of Contents 

Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 

Table 1-1. Summary of Results (3- run Average) 

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 

Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 

Test Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 

Table 1-2. Test Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 3 

Test Methodologies and Procedures ........................................................................................................................... 4 

Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources 4 

Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight 4 

Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 4 

Figure 1-1. Method 5 Sampling Train 7 

Method 5: Determination of Particulate Matter in Stationary Sources 5 

Method 320: Determination of Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) 9 

Figure 1-2 -Schematic of RMFTIR System 78 Meter 10 

Source Information ..................................................................................................................... 13 

Figure 1-3. Diagram of kiln stack sampling location 13 

Figure 1-4. Diagram of DLA Inlet sampling location 14 

Sample Calculations .................................................................................................................................................. 15 

Calculations ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 

Test Results ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 

Table 1-3. Summary Table of Compliance Testing Kiln Stack 19 

Table 1-4. Summary Table of Compliance Testing DLA Inlet 20 

Appendix A Testing Equipment Used A 

Table 1-5. Testing Equipment A 

Appendix B Personnel ............................................................................................................................................... B 

Appendix C Calibration Data 

..................................................................................................................................... C 

Appendix D Field Data 

.............................................................................................................................................. D 

Appendix E Reference Method Data E 

Appendix F Process Data 

......................................................................................................................................... F 

Appendix G Laboratory Data 

.................................................................................................................................... G 
AIR QUALITY" TEST REPORT 

On April 12, 2006, Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (GOLDEN) was contracted by ACME Brick 

Company to perform air testing on the kiln stack, EPN-1, at their facility located in Sealy, Texas. 

This Test Program was performed to demonstrate compliance with ACME Brick's permit 9540; 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40 

Part 63, Subpart JJJJJ. 

For the compliance test program, three (3) 1-hour test runs were performed. All testing was 

performed by experienced test personnel in accordance with United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (USEPA), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60 (40CFR60), and 40CFR63, 

Subpart J J J J J, for hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emitted from brick and structural clay products 

(BSCP) manufacturing facilities. Plant personnel monitored and recorded process conditions and 

relevant diagnostic step changes during testing to verify operating conditions. Included in this test 

report are sections detailing the proposed Test Program, including Executive Summary, Introduction, 

Sampling Procedures, Source Information, Sample Calculation and Test Results Sections; with 

Appendices which will include all quality assurance documentation, calibrations, field data, process 

data, calculated data, and resumes of key personnel. 

All sampling and analysis was performed in accordance with US EPA Methods 1,2, 3, 4, 5, and 320. 

All methods are discussed in the Performance Test Procedures section of this report. 

Tables 1-1 presents the compliance results of the test program performed on the kiln stack. The 

unit was operated at an average of 21:08 ton per hour during testing. Process data collect by ACME 

personnel is included in Appendix F of this report 

Dry Volumetric 

Flow Rate 

Hydrogen 

Fluoride 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 

Hydrogen 

Fluoride 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 

dscfm 

ppmd 

DLA inlet 

20,419 

206.62 

Kiln Stack 

20,369 

22.38 

DRE 

89.17% 

ppmd 18.81 9.91 47.32% 

Ib/hr 13.14 1.60 87.82% 

Ib/hr 2.18 1.29 

Particulate Ib/hr N/A 2.18 

Tal)le t-t. Summary of Results (3- Run •,verage) 

40.83% 

N/A 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD "1 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

The purpose of the compliance test on the kiln stack was to demonstrate compliance for pollutant 

mass emissions. Pollutants tested included hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride (HCI), and 

particulate matter (PM) as required by ACME permit 9540. 

The compliance for the kiln stack consisted of measuring for emissions concentrations of HF, HCl, 

and PM in accordance with Reference Methods (RMs) 1-5 and 320. Specifically, three (3) onehour test runs were performed for the determination of HF and HCI using a Fourier Transform 

Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy at the inlet and outlet of the dry lime absorption (DLA) system. 

Methods 1-4 were performed at the inlet of the DLA system concurrently with the FTIR sampling for 

the determination of mass rates and DLA removal efficiency. The Reference Methods are 

discussed in greater detail in the Performance Test Procedures section of this report. Plant 

personnel monitored and recorded process conditions during testing to verify operating conditions. 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (GOLDEN) was contracted by the ACME Brick Company to 

provide emission testing of the Kiln Stack EPN-1. Mr. Jeff Knapp managed the project, and was 

assisted by Messrs. Greg Burch, Gordon Gossett, and Matt Brumley of GOLDEN. Testing was 

coordinated by Mr. Mike O'Connor of ACME Brick and witnessed by Gary Tidwell, State Observer, 

of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 

Prob|ems •=.countered 

No problems were encountered during this testing period. 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 2 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

'T'es• ¢•verv•ew 

The test program for the DLA system consisted of sampling at the inlet and outlet location per test 

methods and sampling strategies presented below in Table 1-2. 

Sampling/Traverse Points Inlet/Outlet: EPA Method 1 

Velocity/Volumetric Flow Rate Inlet/Outlet: EPA Method 2 S-type Pitot tube 

Molecular Weight Inlet/Outlet: EPA Method 3 Selective Adsorption 

Moisture Content Inlet/Outlet: EPA Method 4 Gravimetdc 

Particulate Matter Outlet: EPA Method 5 Gravimetric 

HF/HCI Inlet/Outlet EPA Method 320 FTIR 

Table 1-2. Tes• Methods 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 3 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

This section provides a detailed description of the methodology and procedures used to conduct this 

program. Test methods from USEPA 40 CFR 60, and 63, Appendix A were employed as written, 

unless otherwise specified below. 

Nlethod t: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources 

Sampling traverse points were determined based on the ratio of the stack 

diameter to the upstream and downstream distances of the sampling plane 

to the closest disturbances. The minimum number of traverse points on the 

sampling plane was determined from Figure 1-2 and Table 1-2 of 40CFR60, 

Appendix A, Method 1. 

Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow 

Rate (Type-S Pitot Tube) 

The average velocity of the stream was determined from differential pressure 

readings at each traverse point using a Type-S Pitot tube and manometer. 

The Pitot tube was constructed per Method 2 design specifications and a 

correction coefficient of 0.84 was assigned. Volumetric flow rate was 

calculated to dry, standard conditions from the average differential pressure, 

source temperature, and moisture measurements. 

Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight 

This method was employed to determine the concentrations of 02 and 002 in 

the gas stream with the use of a Fyrite combustion analyzer. Integrated 

Tedlar@ bag samples were collected and passed through selective adsorbent 

solutions for determination of diluent concentrations by volumetric difference. 

Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 

The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with US EPA 

Reference Method 4 as shown in Figure 1-2. Specifically, stack gas was 

extracted at a constant rate through a glass condenser train consisting of 

four impingers connected in series with leak free, glass U•tube connections. 

The extracted stack gas sample temperature was maintained at a 

temperature below 68°F by use of an ice bath surrounding the glass 

impingers. The gas sample was extracted through the impinger train using a 

rotary vane vacuum pump, and the amount of gas sampled was measured 

with a calibrated dry gas meter. The pump flow was adjusted to maintain 

flow rate through the dry gas meter in order to obtain at least 21.0 dry, 

standard cubic feet (dscf) of sample gas during the test run. At the end of 

each run, the pump was turned off and the final readings were recorded. The 

amount of moisture in the gas stream was determined by measuring the 

volume of condensed moisture in impingers one through three and weighing 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 4 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

the silica gel impinger to calculate percent moisture in the stack flue gas 

stream. One moisture run was performed for every three RA runs. 

Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary 

Sources 

Testing Equipment 

A buttonhook probe nozzle made of stainless steel with a sharp, tapered 

leading edge was used. The angle of the taper was <30 and the taper was 

on the outside to preserve a constant internal diameter. A range of nozzle 

sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling from 1/8 tol/2 inch was available the 

day of testing, and each nozzle was calibrated. The probe liner was made of 

borosilicate glass tubing with a heating system capable of maintaining a gas 

temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120+14°C (248 4-_ 25OF). 

A Type S pitot tube was attached to the probe (as shown in Figure 1-1) to 

allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact (high 

pressure) opening plane of the pitot tube was even with or above the nozzle 

entry plane during sampling. The Type S pitot tube assembly has a 

correction coefficient, typically 0,84 when physical criteria are met. A dual 

inclined/vertical oil-guage manometer was used for velocity head (Dp) and 

orifice differential pressure readings. A borosilicate glass filter holder, with a 

glass frit filter support and a Teflon® coated gasket was used. The holder 

design has a positive pressure seal against leakage from the outside or 

around the filter. The holder is attached immediately at the outlet of the 

probe. 

A filter heating system utilized for this test is capable of maintaining a 

temperature around the filter holder during the sampling of 120+14°C 

(248+25°F). A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to 

within 3°C (5,4°F) is installed so that the temperature around the filter holder 

can be regulated and monitored during sampling. 

The impinger train used to remove moisture from the gas sample consisted 

of four impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or 

any similar leak-free non-contaminating fittings. The first, third and fourth 

impingers were of the Greenburg-Smith design that have been modified by 

replacing the tip with a 1.3 cm (I/2 in.) ID glass tube extending to about 

1.3 cm (1/2 in.) from the bottom of the flask. The second impinger was of the 

Greenburg-Smith design with the standard tip. A thermometer, capable of 

measuring temperature to within 1°C (2°F) was placed at the outlet of the 

fourth impinger for exit temperature monitoring purposes. 

The metering system is made up of the following: vacuum gauge, leak-free 

pump, thermometers capable of measuring temperature to within 3°C 

(5.4°F), dry gas meter (DGM) capable of measuring volume to within 2 

percent, and related equipment, as shown in Figure 1-1. 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 5 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Preparation of Sample Train Co|iection 

During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, all openings where 

contamination can occur are kept covered until just prior to assembly or until 

sampling is about to begin. 100 mL of distilled, deionized water was placed 

in the first two impingers, the third impinger was left empty, and silica gel, 

pre-weighed to the nearest 0.5 g was placed in the fourth impinger. Using 

tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, a labeled (identified) and 

weighed filter was placed in the filter holder. The probe was marked to 

denote the sample point locations, and crushed ice was placed around the 

impingers just before the start of sampling. 

Sample Train Operation 

During the sampling run, an isokinetic sampling rate was maintained, and a 

temperature of 248 + 25°F was maintained around the filter. For each run, 

pertinent data was recorded on the appropriate data sheet. The portholes 

were cleaned prior to the test run to minimize the chance of drawing 

deposited material into the sample. The stack cross-section was traversed, 

as required by Method 5, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the 

stack walls when sampling near the walls or when removing or inserting the 

probe through the portholes; this minimizes the chance of extracting 

deposited material. 

During the test run, periodic adjustments were made to maintain an isokinetic 

sampling rate, and additional ice was added to the impinger train in order to 

maintain an impinger outlet temperature of 68°F or lower. Also, periodic 

checks of the manometer were made to insure it was level and zeroed. 

At the end of the sample run, the coarse adjust valve was closed, the probe 

and nozzle was removed from the stack, the pump was turned off, the final 

DGM meter reading was recorded, and a post-test leak-check was 

conducted. Also, the pitot lines were leak-checked. The lines must pass this 

leak-check in order to validate the velocity head data. Finally, the percent 

isokinetic was calculated to determine whether the run was valid or another 

test run should be made. 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 6 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

TEMPERATURE 

SENSOR 

• IMPINGER TP•kl N 

m 

• • • THERMOMETER 

Nozzle / L • 

•I'•I I•I ,=•I • 

FuF•e• L• 

IMPINGERS 

VACUUM 

THERMOMETERS BYPASS MAIN t• GUAGE 

VALVE VALVE 

GAS 

\ METER 

/ 

VACUUM 

ORIFICE PUMP 

MANOMETER 

Figure '1=t, Method 5 Sampling Train 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 7 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Sample collection procedures began as soon as the probe was removed 

from the stack at the end of the sampling period. The probe was allowed to 

cool so it could be safely handled, all external PM near the tip of the probe 

nozzle was wiped off, and a cap was placed over it to prevent losing or 

gaining PM. The probe was removed from the sample train, any silicone 

grease was wiped clean, and the open outlet of the probe was capped. Care 

was taken not to lose any condensate that might be present. The umbilical 

cord was removed from the last impinger, and the impinger was closed off 

with Teflon® tape. The selected cleanup area was clean and protected from 

the wind so that the chances of contaminating or losing the sample was 

minimized. A portion of the acetone used for cleanup was saved as a blank. 

A volume of 200 mL of this acetone was directly taken from the wash bottle 

being used and placed in a glass sample container labeled "acetone blank." 

The samples were recovered as follows: 

Container No, 1. The filter was carefully removed from the filter holder and 

placed in its original identified petri dish and sealed with Teflon(D tape. A pair 

of tweezers and/or clean disposable surgical gloves was used to handle the 

filter. 

Container No. 2. The recovered PM or any condensate from the probe 

nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder was 

collected by washing these components with acetone and placing the wash 

in a glass container. This container was properly labeled, sealed with 

Teflon® tape, and the sample level was marked with a permanent marker 

prior to transport to the lab. 

Container No. 3. Using a top loaded balance, the liquid that was in the first 

two impingers was measured to within 1 g. The weight was recorded of 

liquid present. This information was required to calculate the moisture 

content of the effluent gas. 

Container No. 4. The color of the indicating silica gel was noted to 

determine whether it had been completely spent, and a notation of its 

condition was made. After taking its final weight, the silica gel was transferred 

from the fourth impinger to its original container and sealed. 

Reagents: The reagents used in sampling are as follows: (1) Glass fiber filters, without 

organic binder, exhibiting at least 99.95 percent efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration) 

on 0.3-micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. The filter efficiency test is conducted 

in accordance with ASTM Method D 2986-71. (2) Silica Gel, Indicating type, 6- to 16- 

mesh. If it has been previously used, it is dried at 175°C (350°F) for 2 hours. Since 

analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required, (3) deionized distilled water 

was used. Analysis of deionized water is run prior to field use to eliminate a high blank 

on test samples. 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 8 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

EPA Method 320: "Deterrninat|or• of Gaseous Compounds by F.xtractive 

Fourier Transform Infrared (FT|R) Spectroscopy" 

This method applies to the analysis of vapor phase organic or inorganic 

compounds that absorb energy in the mid-infrared spectral region, from 

about 400 to 4500 cm-1 (25to 2.5 IJm). These methods were used to 

determine compound-specific concentrations in a multi-component vapor 

phase sample, which is contained in a closed-path gas cell. Spectra of 

samples were collected using a measured background or Io spectrum and a 

stack spectrum, not necessarily collected at the same time. These are 

used to generate the absorbance that is analyzed for gas identifications and 

concentrations. 

Sampling System 

A gas sample was continuously extracted from the source with a heated 

probe and filter heated to 185°C and channeled through 100 feet of heated 

3/8-inch O.D. Teflon® sample line. The quartz filter and sampling system 

was conditioned with gas sample for 19 hours prior to sampling. This line 

temperature was maintained at a constant temperature above 340 F. Digital 

temperature controllers were used to control and monitor the temperature of 

the transport lines that were connected to the instrument. The sample was 

vacuumed through the cell by a sample pump on the exhaust of the cell. The 

pressure and temperature of the instrument were automatically logged in the 

data set and averaged over the same time period as the data. 

Analytica| System and Procedures 

The FTIR system consisted of a source of infrared radiation which was an 

electrically heated ceramic element, an interferometer which modulates the 

IR signal, a heated sample cell of known pathlength through which the gas 

sample was passed, an infrared detector for sensitive detection of the 

infrared energy passed by the cell, and miscellaneous optical elements (flat 

and focusing mirrors) that transfer the infrared radiation between system 

components. The nominal spectral resolution of the system was one half 

wave number (0.5 cm-1 ). 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 9 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Environics 

Model # S-4020 

(Mass Flow 

Controller) 

3-Way Ball 

Valve (• 

System 

Computer 

Exhaust to Atmosphere 

Or return t.•process 

Rotameter 

0-25 LPM 

Figure 1-2 Schematic of RMFTIR System 78 Meter 

(Schematic for 10 Meter is similar) 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD •10 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Pre•Test Procedures 

Performance of instrument and Checks 

Cell Leakage A leak check was performed on both the sample system and the 

cell prior to any testing. For the vacuum test, the cell was pumped to as lowest 

obtainable pressure and sealed; the pressure rise was measured following 2 

minutes. 

System Leakage A leak check from the probe tip to cell outlet was performed by 

connecting a 0 to 25-L/min rotameter to the outlet of the cell. The inlet to the probe 

was closed off, a vacuum of 26 inches mercury was pulled until the rotameter float 

reached zero and maintained a vacuum for two minutes, If any leak was identified it 

was corrected and the test repeated. 

Background -Nitrogen (N2) or zero air were passed through the system and 

internal compartment to minimize ambient effects. 

Path length Determination Freon-22 was passed through the cell and 

analyzed against reference standard spectra using integrated areas to determine the 

operating path length of the FTIR unit. This analysis can be found in the appendices. 

CTS evaluations are contained in calibration data. 

Analyte Spiking Analyte spiking was performed on April 11, 2006. Results of 

the spiking are contained in Appendix G, Laboratory Data. Spiking was performed 

using hydrogen chloride in accordance with EPA 320 for surrogate spiking 

procedures. Surrogate spiking was used because the expected stack concentrations 

differed from expected values. Calibration transfer standards were performed to 

validate the use of hydrogen chloride as a surrogate for hydrogen fluoride. 

Surrogate 

Analyte spiking was conducted with surrogate compound to verify that the 

sampling system could transport the analytes from the probe to the FTIR system. 

The surrogate compound used in a QA spike procedure was representative in 

chemical and physical properties to the target of interest. Under certain 

conditions the use of the surrogate spike results can be representative for 

analytes that are more reactive, more soluble, have a lower absorptivity, or have 

a lower vapor pressure than the surrogate itself. 

Spiking Procedure 

QA spiking was used as a calibration procedure before testing. QA spiking 

involves at least three spiked samples. The analyte concentrations in the spiked 

sample were compared to the expected spike concentration to verify that the 

sampling/analytical system was working properly. When QA spiking is used, the 

method has already been validated at a similar source for the analyte in question. 

The QA spike demonstrates that the validated sampling/analytical conditions are 

being duplicated. If the QA spike fails then the sampling/analytical system is 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD '•1 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

repaired and respiked before testing proceeds. The spike/tracer gas was 

introduced at a constant flow rate of f3 10 percent of the total sample flow, as 

near possible. The use of a rotameter at the end of the sampling train to 

estimate the required spike/tracer gas flow rate was utilized. The use of the 

Environics $4020 SN3437 mass flow meter (4- 2 percent) was utilized to monitor 

the spike flow rate. 

Performance Parar•eters 

Measure System Noise Equivalent Absorbance (NEA) 

System noise was determined by measuring two successive single beam 

spectra at minimal integration time (15 seconds) while the cell was purged 

with pure zero air or N2. The short integration time was to assure that there 

were no changes in the sample or system purge during measurements. The 

absorbance spectrum, which resulted from using one of the single beams as 

background to the other, contained predominantly system noise since the 

spectral features mostly cancelled each other. Noise was then determined by 

measuring the peak-to-peak and RMS absorbance at the wavelength regions 

used for target compound analysis. 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING. LTD "12 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

The testing location on the kiln stack consisted of two, 3-inch diameter ports on a 46.125-inch x 

47.25-inch diameter elliptical stack. The sample port was positioned a distance of 20-ft. upstream 

and 25-ft. downstream from the nearest disturbances. This meets the requirements established in 

the Code of Federal Regulations for sample locations. Traversing was performed at the sample 

points identified below in Figure 1-2. 

2 5 -ft Sampling 

Ports 

CROSS SECTION 

2 0 -ft 

TRAVERSE POINTS: 20 

NUMBER OF PORTS: 2 

POINTS/PORT: 10 

STACK ID:E=46.125/S=47.25 in 

PORT LENGTH: 13.0 in. 

TRAVERSE DISTANCE FROM INSIDE WALL, in. 

POINT NO. East Port South Port 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

14.2 13,7 

16.8 16.4 

19.7 19.5 

23.4 23.3 

28.8 28.8 

43.4 43.5 

48.7 49,5 

52.4 53.3 

55.3 56.3 

57.9 59.0 

Figure 1-3: Diagram of kiln stack sampling location 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD t3 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

The testing location on the DLA inlet consisted of two pods, one on the top being 2-inches in 

diameter and one on the side being 4-inches in diameter, on a 66.5-inch x 64.3-inch diameter 

elliptical stack. The sample port was positioned a distance of 25-ft. from ground leVel: This meets 

the requiremer•ts established in the Code of Federal Regulations for sample locations. Traversing 

was performed at the sample points identified below in Figure 1-2. 

CROSS SECTION 

25-ft 

elevation 

;_ 

TRAVERSE POINTS: 24 

NUMBER OF PORTS: 2 

POINTS/PORT: 12 

STACK ID: S= 64.30/T=66.5 in. 

PORT LENGTH: S=4/T=2 in. 

TRAVERSE 

POINT NO. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

DISTANCE FROM INSIDE WALL, in. 

Side Port Too Port 

8.5 

11.2 

14.2 

17.7 

22.1 

28.3 

45.4 

51.7 

56.0 

59.3 

62.5 

65.3 

6.5 

9.2 

12.2 

15.7 

20.1 

26.3 

43.4 

49.7 

54.0 

57.5 

60.5 

63.3 

Sampling 

Locations 

Figure 1=4: Diagram of DLA inlet sampling location 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD '•4 DEER PARK. TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

The following calculations were used in the emission test program for the kiln outlet stack. The 

values below represent the actual measured data from Run 1 performed on April 12, 2006. 

Caicu|ations 

Stack Gas Flow Rate 

Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) 

tgslalic P•. Pbar +-- 

13.6 

Where: Pbar Barometric pressure 

Pstatic Static pressure of stack gas (in.) 

29.94 in. Hg 

Gas Volume Sampled at Standard Conditions 

Where: Vm Actual gas volume sampled 

Y Gas meter correction factor 

Pbar Measured Barometric Pressure 

Z•H Differential Pressure across meter orifice 

Trn Meter temperature at standard conditions 

46.545 dscf 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD "15 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Water Vapor Collected at Standard Conditions (Vwstd) 

Vwste 0.04707xV•c 

Where: Vic Liquid volume collected in impingers 

(imp 1-3 mL + imp 4 mg) 

Vwst_.__d = 5. 62 • 

Measured Stack Gas Moisture Content 

Vwstd Bws =(Vwstd+Vmstd ) 

B.__•= 10.77 % 

Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) 

M e 0144(%C02 ) + 0.32(%02 ) + 0.28(100 %C0• %02 ) 

M_.._d = 29.14 Ib/Ib-Mole 

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas 

27.94 Ib/Ib-Mole 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD •6 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Stack Gas Velocity 

Where: C• Pitot Coefficient (0. 84) 

Ts Stack Temperature (°R) 

Ps Absolute Stack gas Pressure 

Ms Molecular weight of Stack gas (wet basis) 

44.2 fps 

Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual cubic feet per, wet basis) 

Where: Qs Volumetric flow rate (acfm) 

Ps Absolute Stack gas Pressure 

Ts Stack Temperature (OR) 

C•stdw -• 33,012 acfm 

Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard Conditions, dry basis) 

Q•"• \29.92) (Q' (T.,.) 

Where: Qs Volumetric flow rate (dscfm) 

Ps Absolute Stack gas Pressure 

Ts Stack Temperature (OR) 

B•,s Stack moisture content 

Q•std = 20,137 dscfm 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD '•7 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

( Cgas, ppb I( lb/lb-moleweight C•.s,•b/sc•,db \ 1-• J• 385.26 × 10-6 ft / lb mole 

Where: Cgas, •/sc•, •,b Concentration of compound Iblscf (dry basis) 

Compound Emission Rates 

Elb/,•r Cs,lb/scf cl b 

x Qstd,s• 

Eb_•HF = 1.41 Ib/hr 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 18 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Location .Kiln Stack 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV 

Job # ABSE100 

Date 

Start 

C• 

Y 

AH 

V., 

Vwstd 

% HzO 

% HzOsat 

if el 

%CO2 

%O• 

% CO+ N 

Fo 

Md 

Pg 

Ps 

A• 

%1 

Test Date 

Run Start Time 

Run Finish Time 

Net Traversing Points 

Net Run Time, minutes 

Nozzle Diameter, inches 

Pitot Tube Coefficient 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf 

Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 

Dry Mole Fraction 

Carbon Dioxide, % 

Oxygen, % 

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 

Fuel Factor 

Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 

Average Velocity Head, inches of 

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 

Stack Area, square feet 

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 

4/12/2006 4/12/2006 4112/2006 

9:13 11:38 13:58 

11:11 12:54 15:10 

24 24 24 

60 60 60 

0,297 0,297 0.297 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.996 0,996 0.996 

29.97 29.97 29.97 

2.13 2.22 2.20 

47,314 49.192 49.802 

78.28 82.05 86.65 

46,545 48,066 48.249 

119.4 125.7 129.1 

5.62 5.92 6.08 

10.77 10.96 11.19 

100,0 100.0 100.0 

0.892 0.890 0.888 

3.00 3,50 3.50 

,16.50 16.50 16.50 

80.5 80.0 80.0 

1.47 1.26 1.26 

29.14 29.22 29.22 

27.94 27.99 27.96, 

-0.46 -0.46 -0.46 

29,94 29.94 29,94 

312.8 308.5 310.(• 

0.411 0,429 0.423 

Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 

Particulate Concentration, grains/dscf 

W 

Cgr/dscf 

EIb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 

HCI ppmw Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmw 

HCIppmd Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmd 

HCl Ibs/hr Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr 

HF ppmw Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmw 

HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmd 

HF Ibs/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 

44.2 45.1 44.8 

12,436 12.436 12.431 

20,137 20,598 20,372 

33,012 33,653 33,431 

99.6 100.5 102J 

29.35 40.65 39.10 

0.0097 0.0131 0.0125 

Average 

6C 

0.297 

0.84C 

0.996 

29.97 

2.18 

48.769 

82.3: 

47.620 

124.; 

5.87 

10.97 

100.0 

0.890 

3.333 

16.50 

80.2 

1.33 

29.19 

27.97 

-0.46 

29.936 

310.4 

0.421 

44.7 

12.436 

20,369 

33,365 

100.7 

36.37 

0.0118 

2,04 2.30 2.11 2.18 

11.28 8.40 10.04 9.91 

12.64 9.43 11.30 11.13 

1.45 1.10 1.31 1.29 

20.03 21.49 25.62 22.38 

22.45 24.14 28.85 25.14 

1.41 1.55 1.83 1.60 

Table 1=3. Summary Table of Compliance Testing Kiln Stack 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD '•9 DEER PARK, TX 
AIR QUALITY TEST REPORT 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Location DLA Inlet 

Address Texas 

Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV 

Date 

Start 

O 

Cp 

Y 

PB• 

V•. 

t• 

Vmsld 

Vie 

Vwstd 

% HzO 

Mfd 

%CO• 

%02 

% CO+ N• 

Ma 

Ms 

Pg 

Ps 

t, 

APavg 

Vs 

As 

Oaw 

Test Date 

Run Start Time 

Run Finish Time 

Net Traversing Points 

Net Run Time, minutes 

Pitot Tube Coefficient 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf 

Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 

Dry Mole Fraction 

Carbon Dioxide, % 

Oxygen, % 

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 

Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole 

Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 

Average Velocity Head, inches of H20 

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 

Stack Area, square feet 

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 

4/12/2006 4/12/2006 411212006 

9:10 11:35 14:00 

10:21 12:35 15:00 

24 24 24 

60 60 60 66 

0.84 0.84 0,84 0.84 

0,981 0.981 0.981 0.981 

29.97 29.97 29.97 29.97 

1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 

39.297 40.053 41.353 40.234 

71.25 79.60 81.67 77.47 

38.520 38.660 39.756 38.979 

108.8 101.6 103.8 104.7 

5.12 4.78 4.89 4.93 

11.73 .11.01 10.94 11.23 

0.883 0.890 0.891 0,888 

4.00 3.50 4.00 3.833 

.14.50 14.50 14.50 14.500 

81,5 82.0 81.5 81.7 

29.22 29.14 29.22 29.19 

27.90 27.91 27.99 27,94 

-0.61 -0.82 -0.78 •0.74 

29.93 29.91 29.91 29.92 

313.8 ,328.3 .326.7 322.94 

0.179 0.182 0.156 0.182 

29.2 29.8 30.1 29.7 

19.147 19.147 19.147 19.147 

20,643 20,419 

34,546 34,113 

16.70 

18.81 

2.18 

183.35 

206.62 

13.14 

20,211 20,402 

•33,554 34,240 

HCl ppmw Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmw 14.27 20.39 15.4• 

HCIppmd Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmd 16.17 22.91 17.3• 

HCI Ibs/hr Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr 1.86 2.65 2.03 

HF ppmw Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmw 203.72 169.66 176.66 

HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmd 230.80 190.65 198.36 

HF Ibs/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 14.53 12.12 12.76 

Table 1-4. Summary Table of Compliance Testing DLA Inlet 

GOLDEN SPECIALTY CONSULTING, LTD 20 DEER PARK, TX 

Testing Equipment 

Provided in Table 1-5 below is a list of all testing equipment used in testing of the Kiln Stack. 

Equipment 

80M Base Module 

80M Cell 

Accessory 

10M Base Module 

10M Cell 

Accessory 

Gas Divider 

Mass Flow 

Heated Line 

Rotameter 

Rotameter 

Golden Specialty Consulting Trailer #6 

Model 

B-ZDI24-C 

E-7800-C 

B-ZMI24-C 

E-1000-C 

S-4020 

0-4 Lpm 

100ft Custom 

sections 

0-0.8325 Lpm 

0-16.56 Lpm 

Manufacturer 

IMACC 

IMACC 

IMACC 

IMACC 

Environics 

Dwyer 

Technical Heaters 

Dwyer 

Dwyer 

Serial Number 

BOO2402E 

78-E002903H 

BOO2903H 

EOO2602F 

3437 

G56275 

N/A 

0102100220448-A 

0103050235197-A 

Sample Pump 01320T ADI 103083 

Isokinetic train 010175 APEX 10175 

Gas Meter N/A Millenium 2030 

Table 1-5. Testing Equipment Used 

Scott B. Swiggard 

President/Technical Director 

Professio.a| Experience Summary 

Broad background in environmental compliance and regulatory issues. Has directed projects associated with air permitting, groundwater contamination, air toxins emissions control, hazardous materials control and reporting, wastewater process control (metals removal), energy conservation, industrial ventilation, noise control, bioremediation, and storm water control. 

Extensive background in emission testing, with over 1,300 tests personally conducted and/or supervised. Responsible for the continued development of testing capabilities and their research and development. Provides project management for testing at assigned client's facilities. Provides field support to the project managers on testing protocols and methods. 

Responsible for verification and validation on test data as part of a Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (January 1997 Present) Golden Specialty Laboratory, Ltd.. (April 2005 Present) Position: President/Technical Director 

RAMCON Environmental Corporation (March 1995 -January 1997) Position: Gulf Coast Division Manager 

ARKLATEX Environmental Consultants, Inc. (April 1992 February 1995) Position: Environmental Engineer 

ALLOY Piping Products, Inc. (September 1990 April 1992) Position: Industrial Engineer 

United States Air Force (June 1980 September 1990) Position: Quality Assurance Inspector/Evaluator 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) and Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) Source Testing Accreditation Council (STAC) Board Member 

Education 

Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering, Southern Illinois University, 1991 Associate degree in Aviation Maintenance Technology, Community College of the Air Force, 1990 Graduate of the United States Air Force Air University in Management/Supervision, 1989 Licensed airframe and power plant mechanic 

FTIR 80 hour training course conducted by Dr. Robert Spellicy, IMACC, Round Rock, Texas Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop; Walter Smith & Associates, 2003 
Karen L Swiggard 

Vice President/Quality Assurance Officer 

Professional Work Sur•mary 

Broad background in Safety, environmental compliance and regulatory issues. Has managed projects associated with Hazard Communication, Blood borne pathogens, Tuberculosis Infection Control, Respiratory Projection, Personal Protective Equipment, Life Safety Code, Fire Safety, Electrical Safety, Back Injury Protection, Workplace Violence, Employee Injury and Illness Reporting, Emergency Response, Hazardous Drugs, Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality, and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare 

Organizations (JCAHO) ............. 

Extensive background in employee Training in areas of: Hazard Communication, Blood borne pathogens, Tuberculosis Infection Control• Respiratory Projection, Personal Protective Equipment, Fire Safety, Electrical 

Safety, Back Injury Prevention, Emergency Response, and Computer Ergonomics Developed and presented intensive training courses for Health and Safety professionals at all NASA centers 

including: Occupational Ergonomics and Blood borne Pathogens. 

While working for Texas Water Commission (now Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, TNRCC). She was responsible for the enforcement of RCRA program in Texas including the inspection and 

evaluation of RCRA programs at various chemical plants and other facilities handling hazardous waste. 

Was a key member for emergency response for chemical spills and accidents. 

Managed environment of care accreditation process of Kelsey-Seybold, Houston Texas, for JCAHO in 

which it was awarded. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (February 1999 Present) 

Position: Vice President 

Kelsey-Seybold Clinic (June 1995- February 1999) 

Position: Manager of Environmental Health and Safety 

NASA-Johnson Space Center (April 1986- June 1995) 

Position: Health & Safety Training Specialist/Industrial Hygienist 

Texas Water Commission (February 1984- April 1986) 

Position: Environmental Quality Specialist 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) 

Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) 

American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) 

Education 

Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science, University of Houston, 1984 

Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop, Walter Smith & Associates 2002 
Greg D. Burch, QSTI 

Manager, Emissions Testing 

Professional Experience Summary 

® Responsible for designing, planning and managing sampling programs, daily assignments of field testing crews, sample analysis, data reduction, QA/QC reviews, and reporting activities. 

o Broad background in environmental compliance and regulatory issues. Extensive experience designing and managing test programs to meet federal, state and local compliance demonstration requirements. ® Participated in or supervised over 2,500 tests across twenty-three states and Puerto Rico, including 

agent 

hazardous waste inc. trial burns, EPA Superfund cleanup sites, and compliance testing performed as an for the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 

® Sampling experience includes flow stream characterization and monitoring of a number of types of flow streams for engineering purposes; emissions sampling for regulatory compliance demonstration; emissions sampling for systems audit requirements of continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) and predictive emissions monitoring systems (PEMS). 

• Assist clients in troubleshooting and repairing existing emissions monitoring systems, or designing and implementing new systems. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (April 2000 Present) Position: Manager, Emissions Testing 

ARI Environmental, Inc. (May 1996- April 2000) Position: Project Manager 

RMT- Jones and Neuse, Inc. (May 1994 May 1996) Position: Program Director 

Tracer Technology Division of Team, Inc. (May 1989 May 1994) Position: Staff Engineer 

United States Navy (March 1983 March 1989) Position: Avionics Repair Technician Second Class / Work Center Supervisor 

Professional Affiliatio.s 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) 

Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) 

Professional Education 

Kingwood College, Kingwood, TX, 4.0 GPA, Pres. Honor Roll, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society Southwest Missouri State Electronics Vocational Technical School United States Navy Multiple Electronics and Quality Assurance Courses, 102 credit hours 40 Hour Hazwoper Training 29 CFR 1910.120 

Fundamentals of Instructor Training American Red Cross 

Visible Emissions Certified (EPA Method 9) Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop, Walter Smith & Associates, 2003 and 2004 Preparation for the SES QSTI Exam Workshop, Walter Smith and Associates, 2005 SkilIPath® Seminars, Project Management Workshop, 2003 
Jeff Knapp, QSTI 

Supervisor, Emissions Testing 

Pro•:essionai Experience Sur•i•ary 

Performed emissions testing and managed projects for 12 years throughout the United States utilizing California Air Resources Board (CARB), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Texas 

Air Control Board (TACB) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies. 

Performed over 400 compliance tests using extractive Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Additionally, was consulted and provided supporting data for the development of EPA Method 318 

"Extractive FTIR Method for Measurement of Emissions from the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries." 

Performed on and/or managed projects in El Salvador and Bolivia. 

Recovery team member for DESRET Chemical Depot demilitarization em=ssions trial burns. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (September 05 Present) 

Position: Supervisor, Emissions Testing 

Western Environmental Services and Testing, Inc. (September 1995 September 2005) 

Position: Field Testing Supervisor, Project Manager 

Sierra Environmental Engineering (February 1994 September 1995) 

Position: Chemist 

United States Navy (February 1988 February 1994) 

Position: Nuclear Plant Operator, Engineering Laboratory Technician 

Professional Affiliatio.s, Training, and Certifications 

OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPR 

MSHA 

Houston Area Safety Council 

Louisiana Safety Council 

Certified Visible Emissions Evaluator 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) 

QSTI 

Education 

University of Southern California, Mechanical Engineering 

Hampton University, Nuclear Engineering 

United States NAVY, Nuclear Power School 

United States NAVY, Engineering Laboratory Technician 
Paula Metz 

Reports Coordinator / instrumentation Technician 

Professional Experier•ce Summary 

Experience with EPA testing regulations, including 40 CFR, Part 60 and Part 75. 

Experienced with TCEQ testing regulations, including 30TACl15, 30TACl17, Procedures Manual. and TCEQ Sampling 

CEM instrumentation projects include continuous analysis for carbon monoxide (CO), total oxides of nitrogen (NO×), oxygen (O2), and carbon dioxide (CO2). 

velocity 

Knowledgeable 

and moisture 

in all required regulations and methodologies for the testing and analysis of stack gas content analysis. 

Knowledgeable in the testing requirements and procedures for the testing and analysis of Predictive Emissions monitoring systems (PEMS). 

Assists in report review and finished product. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (February 2001 Present) Position: Instrumentation Technician 

Educatior• 

Working on general education to be credited to a BS Degree in Environmental Science Visible Emissions Certified (EPA Method 9) 12 Hour Basic Instrumentation Training, California Analytical Instruments, January 2003 Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop, Walter Smith & Associates, 2002, 2003 and 2004 SkillPath® Seminars, Employee Management and Supervision Workshop, 2003 
Gordon L. Gossett 

Maintenance Coordinator 

Professional Experience Summary 

Responsible for coordinating/managing maintenance of all company facilities, grounds, vehicles, trailers, 

labs, and environmental equipment. 

Responsible for establishing and maintaining a quality control program to monitor key equipment assets and 

establishing a preventative maintenance process. 

Responsible for designing and building environmental equipment in-house and all equipment and testing 

supply purchasing. 

20+ years of Supervisory experience in construction and maintenance. 

Experience in performing maintenance and calibrations on a variety of air testing equipment. 

Experience with EPA testing regulations, including 40 CFR, Part 60 and Part 75. 

CEM instrumentation projects include continuous analysis for carbon monoxide (CO), total oxides of 

nitrogen (NOx), oxygen (02), and carbon dioxide (CO2). 

Knowledgeable in methodologies for the testing and analysis of stack gas velocity and moisture content 

analysis. 

Knowledgeable in the testing requirements and procedures for the testing and analysis of Predictive 

Emissions monitoring systems (PEMS) and Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEMS). 

Partial Work Experience 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. (October 2003 Present) 

Position: Maintenance Manager 

Brown & Root-Shell Chemical Complex (November 2002 October 2003) 

Position: Pipe Foreman 

Brown & Root-Exxon Chemical Facility (April 2001 October 2002) 

Position: General Foreman 

Encompass Industrial Services-Dow Chemical Company, Seadrift Operations (October 2000 -April 2001) 

Position: Supervisor of Maintenance 

Brown & Root-Union Carbide Plant (April 1986-October 2000) 

Position: Supervisor, Welding Department (Shop & Field) 

Education 

Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop; Walter Smith & Associates, 2004 

Skillpath Seminar, January 2004 

American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector, April 1998 

8-Hr Training in Welding and Quality Control for the Petro-Chem Industry, November 1994 

Certified Instructor for The Construction Education Foundation, July 1993 

24-hr Training Course-Visual Testing, April 1993 

16-hr Training Course-Liquid Penetrant Testing, October 1991 

24-hr Radiographic Film Interpretation, May 1990 

Victoria College, 1973-1974 

H.Po Gas Products, inc. 

P.O. Box 2074 

6701 West Bay Road 

Baytown, TX 77522-2074 

Phone: (281)383-7236 

Fax: (281)573-9267 

Emalh Hpgasproduct@aol.com 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

Customer Information: 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. 

931 Seaco Court 

Deer Park, TX 77536 

POO.#2006006 

Mixture Information: 

Cylinder #: SG9114519 

Valve: 330 CGA 

Volume: 142 scf 

Pressure: 2000 psia 

Certified Gas Standard For Instrument Calibration (+or- 2%) 

Component Requested Concentration Level Reported Concentration Level 

(Mole %) (Mole %) 

Hydrogen Chloride 300 ppm 298 ppm 

Sulfur Hexafluoride 4 ppm 4 ppm 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

Shelf Life: 03 months 

Make Date: 02-14-06 

Exp. Date: 05-13-06 

Additional Remarks: 
H.P. Gas Products• lnco 

P.O. Box 2074 

6701 West Bay Road 

Baytown, TX 77522-2074 

Phone: (281)383-7236 

Fax: (281)573-9267 

Email: Hpgasproduct@aol.com 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

Customer Information: 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. 

931 Seaco Court 

Deer Park, TX 77536 

P.O.#2006006 

Mixture Information: 

Cylinder #: CC169777 

Valve: 350 CGA 

Volume: 142 scf 

Pressure: 2000 psia 

Certified Gas Standard For Instrument Calibration (+or- 2%) 

Component Requested Concentration Level Reported Concentration Level 

(Mole %1 (Mole %) 

Ethylene 10 ppm 10 ppm 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

Shelf Life: 

Make Date: 

Exp. Date: 

06 months 

02-14-06 

08-13-06 

Additional Remarks: 



PITOT TUBE INSPECTION DATA SHEET 

PreF se.mpl e Post Sample D•te•C) • 

eve-l-? 

obstructions ? 

damaged? 

-I0° < •i < +I0° 

-I0 < • < +I0 

-5 < •I < +5 

_5 < • < +5 

¥ 

8 

A 

}.05 Dt < Pa < 1.5 Dt 

I.OS Dt < Pb < 1.5 D t 

3/16"• Dt • 3/8" 

.A tan y < 0.125" 

A tan .• < 0.0312,5" 

Pa Pb + 0.063" 

Comments: 

PltOt" tube/probe number. •_'[ meets or exceeds all: specifications 

criteria and/or appl, lcable design features* and is hereby assigned a 

pitot tube calibration factor of 0.84. 

Signature 

-•See 40 CFR 60, Vo). •Z, No. 160, Hethod ZL V'erify the m•nimum 

inch setbBc• Of •he ther•o¢ou:Ple and Ihe minimum 3/a inch 

s•paration between •he pitot %ube and th• nozzle as sho•n at 

the top of th•s page. 

Date 

•orm GSC TMOOa 
Probe Nozzl• I)i•rnet•} Calibration Q4-2005 

Date 

Set 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005: 

Set 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

12/1/2005 

Nozzle ID# 

A 

A1 

A2 

A3 

A4 

A5 

A6 

A7 

B 

B1 

B2 

B3 

B4 

B5 

B6 

B7 

Nozzle Diameter, Dn (inches) 

Dnl 

0.112 

0.176 

0.238 

0.273 

0.297 

0.338 

0.502 

0.114 

0.177 

0.237 

0.272 

0.371 

0.423 

0.494 

Dn2 

0.113 

0.175 

0.239• 

0.275 

0.299 

0.339 

0.501 

0.114 

0.176i 

0.240 

0.269 

0.369 

0.424 

0.495 

Dn3 

0.111i 

0.175 

0.238 

0.274 

0.298 

0.338 

0.502 

0.115 

0.176 

0.238 

0.271 

DnAvg 

0.112 

0.175 

0.238 

0.274 

0.298 

0.338 

0.502 

0.114 

0.176 

0.238i 

Hi-Low 

0.002 

0.001 

0.001 

0.002 

0.002 

0.001 

0.001 

0.001 

0.001 

0.003 

Pass 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

0.271 0.003 Yes 

0.371 0.370 0.002 Yes 

0.424 0.424 0.001 Yes 

0.494 0.494 0.001 Yes 

QA/QC Check: 

Each Diameter measured to +/-0.001 inches? 

High-Low < 0.004 inches? 
File 

Source 

Pathlength Determination 

_41 c__ l a)_ !,._s_P• Facility ACME Brick 

Kiln Stack, Sealy, TX Date 4/11/2006 

Freon 22 

Temperature Reference 

1050-1200 cm-1 

185 Temperature Standard 185 

Pressure Reference 760 Pressure Standard 754.3 

Pathlength Reference 16.88 Concentration Standard 10.4 

Area Reference 8.119 Area Standard 3.555 

Concentration Reference 10.9 Pathlength Standard 7.80 

Ethylene 800-1150 era-1 

Temperature Reference 185 Temperature Standard 

Pressure Reference 773 Pressure Standard 

Pathlength Reference 6.23 Concentration Standard 

Area Reference 30.509 Area Standard 

Concentration Reference 500 Pathlength Standard 

Carbon Monoxide 

Temperature Reference 185 Temperature Standard 

Pressure Reference 760 Pressure Standard 

Pathlength Reference 26 Concentration Standard 

Area Reference 14.148 Area Standard 

Concentration Reference 225 Pathlength Standard 
Pathlength Determination 

File 411 call a.spa Facility ACME Brick 

Source Kiln Stack, Sealy, TX Date 4/11/2006 

78m 

Freon 22 1050-1200 cm-1 

Temperature Reference 185 Temperature Standard 162.2 

Pressure Reference 760 IPressure Standard 784.2 

Pathlength Reference 16.88 Concentration Standard 10.4 

Area Reference 8.119 Area Standard 21.659 

'Concentration Reference 10.9 Pathlength Standard 43,46 

Ethylene 800-1150 cm-1 

Temperature Reference 185 Temperature Standard 

Pressure Reference 773 Pressure Standard 

Pathlength Reference 6.23 Concentration Standard 

Area Reference 30.509 Area Standard 

Concentration Reference 500 Pathlength Standard 

Carbon Monoxide 

Temperature Reference 

Pressure Reference 

Pathlength Reference 

Area Reference 

Concentration Reference 

185i Temperature Standard 

760 Pressure Standard 

26 Concentration Standard 

14.148 !Area Standard 

225 Pathlength Standard 
Tue Apt 11 t t :45:07 2006 (GMT-05:0O) Collection time: Tue Apt tl 11:50:10 2006 (GI• 

6 

5- 

4- 

3- 

2- 

1 

0 

-1- 

4000 3000 2000 1000 

Wavenumbers (cm-1) 

Quant Results 

No quant results for the selected spectrum! 

Expanded fingerprint region 

o 

(• 

0.12- 

0.10 

0.08 

0.06 

0.04 

0.02 

1200 1000 

Wavenumbers (cm-1) 

Number of sample scans: 179 

Number of background scans: 179 

Resolution: 0.500 

Sample gain: 1.0 

Mirror velocity: 1.8988 

Aperture: 100.00 

Detector: MCT/B 

Beamsplitter: ZnSe 

Source: IR 
Wed A )r "•2 00:t5:09 2006 (GMT=05:0O) Collection time: Wed Apr 12 00:20:13 2006 (GI 

6 

-2 

4000 3000 2000 1000 

Wavenumbers (cm-1) 

Quant Results 

No quant results for the selecte(t spectrum! 

Expanded fingerprint region 

0.6 

0.5. 

0.4 

0.3i 

0.2 

0.1 

1200 1000 

Wavenumbers (cm-1) 

Number of sample scans: 179 

Number of background scans: 179 

Resolution: 0.500 

Sample gain: 1.0 

Mirror velocity: 1.8988 

Aperture: 10.00 

Detector: MCT/A 

Beamsplitter: ZnSe 

Source: IR 
C• u• 

o • ••o 

o • Lu I- n o_ • 0 
Series 4020 

System S/N 3437 

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

MFC#: 1 Size: 10000 SCCM 

SERIAL NUMBER 682200002 

This flow controller was calibrated using a Sierra Cal Bench "I'M, a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standard 

Calibration System. This calibration was performed with Nitrogen at a standard reference temperature 

and pressure of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance data. This data is used by the system 

operating modes to improve the flow accuracy. 

Set Flow True Flow 

5 % 500.0 CCM 528.400 CCM 

10 % 1000.0 CCM 1062:433 CCM 

20 % 2000.0 CCM 2121.767 CCM 

30 % 3000.0 CCM 3160.850 CCM 

40 % 4000.0 CCM 418&297 CCM 

50 % 5000.0 CCM 5201:329 CCM 

60 % 6000.0 CCM 6201.093 CCM 

70 % 7000.0 CCM 7193.614 CCM 

80 % 8000.0 CCM 8180,880 CCM 

90 % 9000.0 CCM 9179.406 CCM 

100 % 10000.0 CCM 10191.920 CCM 

Computerized Gas Mixing/Dilution/Calibration Systems 

Envirenics inc. 69 Industrial Park Road East eTolland, CT 06084 (860) 872-1111 Fax (860) 870-9333 

World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics.com 
Series 4020 

System S/N 3437 

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

MFC#: 2 Size: 10000 SCCM 

SERIAL NUMBER 2357800001 

This flow controller was calibrated using a Sierra Cal Bench TM, a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standard 

Calibration System. This calibration was performed with Nitrogen at a standard reference temperature 

and pressure of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance data. This data is used by the system 

operating modes to improve the flow accuracy. 

Set Flow True Flow 

5 % 500.0 CCM 484.946 CCM 

10 % 1000.0 CCM 1003.851 CCM 

20 % 2000.0 CCM 2032.041 CCM 

30 % 3000.0 CCM 3049.599 CCM 

40. % 4000.0 CCM 4062.055 CCM 

50 % 5000.0 CCM 5066.571 CCM 

60 % 6000.0 CCM 6075.607 CCM 

70 % 7000.0 CCM 7085.042 CCM 

80 % 8000.0 CCM 8099.648 CCM 

90 % 9000,0 CCM 9131.232 CCM 

100 % 10000.0 CCM 10188.685 CCM 

Verified by: .._.•,._= Date: 

Computerized Gas MixingSystems 

Environics inc. 69 Industrial Park Road East oTolland, CT 06084 (860) 872-1111 Fax (860) 870-9333 

World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@enwronics.com 
Series 4020 

System S/N 3437 

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

MFC#: 3 Size: 1000 SCCM 

SERIAL NUMBER 2290000001 

This flow controller was calibrated using a Sierra Cal Bench T•, a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standard 

Calibration System. This calibration was performed with Nitrogen at a standard reference temperature 

and pressure of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance data. This data is used by the system 

operating modes to improve the flow accuracy. 

Set Flow True Flow 

5 % 50.0 CCM 50.269 CCM 

10 % 100.0 CCM 102.032 CCM 

20 % 200.0 CCM 204.758 CCM 

30 % 300.0 CCM 307.028 CCM 

40 % 400.0 CCM 408.855 CCM 

50 % 500.0 CCM 510.196 CCM 

60 % 600.0 CCM 611.501 CCM 

70 % 700.0 CCM 712.166 CCM 

80 % 800.0 CCM 814.780 CCM 

90 % 900.0 CCM 917.009 CCM 

100 % 1000.0 CCM 1021.798 CCM 

Date: 

Computerized Gas MixingSystems 

Environ|cs inc. 69 Industrial Park Road East oTolland, CT 06084 (860) 872-1111 Fax (860) 870-9333 

World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics,com 
Series 4020 

System S/N 3437 

ENVIRONICS FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

MFC#: 4 Size: 100 SCCM 

SERIAL NUMBER 2278800001 

This flow controller was calibrated using a Sierra Cal Bench TM, a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standard 

Calibration System. This calibration was performed with Nitrogen at a.standard reference temperature 

and pressure of 32 and 29.92 in.HG. This is not performance data. This data is used by the system 

operating modes to improve the flow accuracy. 

Set Flow True Flow 

5 % 5.0 CCM 4.889 CCM 

10 % 10.0 CCM 10.099 CCM 

20 % 20.0 CCM 20.419 CCM 

30 % 30.0 CCM 30.664 CCM 

40 % 40.0 CCM 40.885 CCM 

50 % 50.0 CCM 51.005 CCM 

60 % 60.0 CCM 61.114 CCM 

70 % 70.0 CCM 71.194 CCM 

80 % 80.0 CCM 81.319 CCM 

90 % 90.0 CCM 91.399 CCM 

100 % 100.0 CCM 101.699 CCM 

Verified y: Date: 

Computerized Gas MixingSystems 

69 Industrial Park Road East Tolland, CT 06084 (860) 872-1111 Fax (860) 870-9333 

World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics.com 

Client/Plant Name 

City/State 

Test Location 

FIELD DATA SHEET 1 

Sampling and Velocity Traverse Points 

Date/Time 

Personnel 

9130/94:FDI-1 

Distance-from Far Wall to Outside of Port 

Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness 

Stack/Duct (l) Blue P•int Measured 

Depth/Diameter (> 12 #l. ?) 

Width (if rectangular) 

Equiv. Diameter (if rect.) 

D 

e 2 D W/(D + W} 

Area (A) f> 113in. 2 ?) 

A rr Dz/4 or D W 

Upstream l> 2 De?) 

Downstream (> 

Distance D 

Rectangular Matrix 

Circle larger of two. 

No. Pts* 

Pt, 

.2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

% Duct 

Depth 

/2.2 

Dist. from 

Inside Wall* 

Dist. from 

Outside of 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

Do not place closer to stack walls than: 

1.0 in. for stack dia. > 24 in. 

0.5 in. for stack dia. 12 to _<24 in. 

Sketch of Location:" In the space above, sketch a flow diagram of the test location; show the distance from the ports to 

flow disturbances before and •,,•,.-•+-•- .•.•,,e•'o*•h ,h• •,•.•r'•ee-•'=•'fi•n=l.•..,•,.•..,.•roa; show .<amplinno •--nnrt- locations. In horizontal ducts, 

check for dust buildups and measure or estimate the de•,•. 

QA/QC Check / / •" 

Checked by: •-• / / 

Person•.•l•atur•/Date) 

Specifications •?Reasonablene•/• 

er (Signature/Date) 
FIELD DATA SHEE-• 2 

Velocity" Head, Temperature, and Stack Pressure Measurements 

ClienVPlant Name 

City/State •<Av 

Test Location/Run 

9/30/94: 

Job# 

Personnel 

FD2-1 

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned paraflel to the stack or duct axis. 

Pitot Tube ID # 

PitotTube Coefficient (Cp) 

Ap Gauge Sensitivity 

Barometric Pressure (Pb) (in. Hg) 

Test Location Elevation Difference 

from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) 

Corr Pb Pb 0.001 B (in. Hg) 

o.Sy 

O 

(•') Piezometer •,"'Type S 

Static-Pressure (Pq) (in. H20) 

Post-test Leak Check: Side 

Pressure Tap Ap (in. H20) 

Stable for 15 seconds? (yes no) 

Pitot Tube Condition: 

Damaged? •" 

Post-test Intercomponent Spacing: 

Level/Zero Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk 

Start Time: 

Pt. Ap 

# in. H•O °F # 

Velocity Traverses 

I0 Finish Time: /0•0 

Temp. Pt. Ap Temp. 

in, H20 °F 

Average: 

QNQC Check 

Completeness 

Checked by: •Legibility •ccura cy __•Jss pecificatio ns ••Reasonableness__ 

J Pers°•ature/Date) •a 

m •ader (Sign ature/Date) 
Facility: /@,• 

Location: 

West Term: 

Page / •)f /i 

Method 

Test No: / 

Date: 9-ioZ-- o& 

// Source Test Data Sheet 

Pre-test t1. 

Port change 

Port change•_•_• cfm @ 

Post Test @,Og(.) cfm @ iO, O Init.• 

Pitot Leak Checl•: Pre 

PRETEST DATA: 

P Bar: 

Sample Time 

P static • 

Ambient F 

Pitot Factor 

K3 Factor 

Stack 

Diagram 

Meter No. 

Meter Factor 

Filter No. 

Filter Tare 

CalH@ 

Probe 

Nozzle • 

Grams/mL 

Impinger No. Post Pre Net 

1. _.•._•_•_l.nL_•,,•.• .•, 

3. •'t'm• 69.,S'.1 4.-•--m• •--•--- gT• X• 

5. mL 

MOLE 

Bws 

Point 

Layout 

Test SummalT: 

Notes: 

Stm't Time: O •,] (,• Stop Time: 

Point 

Meter Conditions 

AP 

Meter 

Volume 

z • STq. 7o 

IS 

Stack Probe 

Temperatm-e 

Oven Imp. 

Out 

Meter 

Out 

7o 

-7/ 

Vac. 

•,0 

•.o 

•-0 
FIELD DATA SHEET 2. 

Velocity' Head, Temperature, and Stack Pressure Measurements 

Client/Plant Name A • 

City/State "f'•'k • 

Test Location/Run # .'•. 

Job# 

Date 

Persorinel __•/• 

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned parallel to the stack or duct axis. 

9/30/94; FD2-1 

Pitot Tube ID # 

PitotTube Coeffi.cient (C•) 

Ap Gauge Sensitivity 

Barometric Pressure (P•) (in. Hg) 

Test Location Elevation Difference 

[from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) 

Corr Pb Pb 0.001 B (in. Hg) 

o.oS 

(•) Piezometer •/' Type S 

Static. Pressure (Pq) (in. H20) 

Post-test Leak Check: Side 

Pressure Tap Ap (in. H20) 

Stable for 15 seconds? (yes no) 

Pitot Tube Condition: 

Damaged? ,/k/ 

Post-test Intercomponent Spacing: 

A B 

Level/Zero Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk (' 

Velocity Traverses 

Start Time: •" Finish Time: 

Pt. Ap Temp. Pt. Ap Temp. 

# in. H20 F # in. H20 F 

s/ o.tt • 7/ o./• 30# 

a 0_• 300 3 0.I• 33• 

.8 • 333 8 ,•2 •Y2_ 

/o o.• 2 3 3I lo 0.• •. 3Y6 

Average: 

c.,c. /, / Completeness • Legibility" .//Accuracy•Specific.•ations •/•easonableness 

Perso••re/pate) 2a• L•r (Signature/Date) 
Facility: /t•,• 

Location: 

Test Term: .£/) 

Page / of /' 

Method __• Source Test Data Sheet 

Test No: • 

Dat•: •/•/•_- o• 

Pre-test 0,00,<• ofm @ •Init. _• 

Port change. cfm @ __u Init.-- 

Port change_ cfm @ Init. • 

Post Test •.ffj• cfm @ #,•,-•.•-• Init. • 

Pitot Leak Check: Pre a•----•st• 

PRETEST DATA: 

P Bar: • ?/ 

Sample Time __•__ 

P static O- • • 

Ambient F 7y 

Pitot Factor O o•] 

K3 Factor 

Grams/mL 

y. ost Pre Net 

o•. 

CO• 3. _5___ 

MOLE 

Bws 

Stack 

DiagTam • 

Layout 

Test Smmnary: Start Time: /• 2•" Stop Time: 

Notes:••x•• •//•-•(• 

Point Time 

li 'O 

1.23o 

/• 

Meter Conditions 

Meter 

AP •/AP AH Volume Stack Probe 

Temperatm'e 

Oven Imp. 

Out 

q2 

50 

.5-o 

Meter 

om 

78 

fro 

Vac. 

Z, 0 

2.0 

2.0 
Client/Plant Name 

City/State •4,•/•/ 

Test Location/Run # ,_• 

FIELD DATA SHEET 2 

Velocity Head, Temperature, and Stack Pressure Measurements 

ZK•F,*J. • Job# 

Personoel 

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned parallel to the stack or duct axis. 

9/30/94; FD2-1 

Pitot Tube ID # 

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 

Ap Gauge Sensitivity 

Barometric Pressure (Pb) (in. Hg) 

Test Location Elevation Difference 

from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) 

.C °rr Pb Pb 0.001 B (in. Hg) 

(¢') Piezometer J Type S 

Static-Pressure (P•) (in. H20) 

Post-test Leak Check: Side 

Pressure Tap Ap (in. H20 

Stable for 15 seconds? (yes no) 

Pitot Tube Condition: 

Damaged? 

Post-test Intercomponent Spacing: 

Level/Zero Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk...( 

Velocity Traverses 

Start Time: Finish Time: 

Pt. Ap Temp. Pt. Ap Temp. 

# in. H20 °F # in. H20 °F 

.•/ o.o• ,•o# /7 o.// 

2 •2• 3•Y 2 o.• Y 3 3J 

Average: 

Completeness Legibility uracy 

Checked by: 

••...•• 

Personnel (,_•g"•ature/Date) / Te#Leader (Signature/Date) 
Facility: 1•_ ¢lc' 

Location:••. Test Team•" 

Pa•e ---Z-_ of 

Test No. • 

Inil. 

IniL 

IniL • 

PRETEST DATA: 

P Bar.: •5', • 

Sample Time 6 

P static 

Ambient F 

Pitot Factor 

K3 Factor 

Meter No. • • 

Meter Factor • Impingcr No. Post Pre 

Filter No. 2..•g_mL /•o 7• Filter Tare 3. mE • •6g_•_.• 

No•¢ To• g• 

Set co; • 

Mole. 

Bws. 

Stack 

Diagram 

Test Sthnmary: 

Notes: 

Point 

Layout 

Start Time:/•21• Stop Time: 

Meter Conditiom 

Meter 

•AP AH Volume 

•ni•Vol.mo • 

I.S C,•/, 70 

#.• • •,<•'6• 

1• DT•GO 

X• 6•6. •S 

Temperature d# 

Imp. Meter•,, •' Meter Va•. 

Stack Probe Oven Out •I• Out 
Client/Plant Name 

City/State •C_ •<c•47,, i 

Zest Location /•', •/• J•,•-•.,../,•. 

FIELD DATA SHEET 1 

Sampling and Velocity Traverse Points 

Job # 

•'•y//l• / ,,] Personnel 

Port I.D, 

Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port 

Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness 

Stack/Duct (/) Blue Print 

Depth/Diameter (> 12 [n. ?) 

Width (if rectangular) 

Equiv. Diameter (if rect.} 

D 

o 2DW/(D + W) 

Area (A} (> 113in. 2 ?) 

A rfDz/4orDW 

Upstream (•2 De?) 

Downstream (• 0. 

Measured 

Distance No. Pts* D 

Rectangulsr Matrix 

Pt, 

9130194:FDI-1 

Date/Time 

% Duct Dist. from Dist. from 

Depth Inside Wall Outside of 

Port 

13 

* Circ/e larger of two. /• `)" 

14 

•¢:: ..... i'" -\ \,,. 

20 

•'• 

DO not •ace closer to stack wais than: 

• O•fi,• m ].0 •n. for stack dia. >24 

Sketch of Location:" In the space above, sketch a flow diagram of the test location; show the distance from the ports to 

disturbances before, and •,,•*•e,-. ql•,•÷,-h .h• ornee-•n•.tinn•l arP.•: .show samDlin(3 eort locations. In horizontal ducts, 

IIOW 

check for dust buildups and measure or estimate the depth. 

Completeness gibilit uracy 

Checked by: 

Persoi•l-el• S{• nat ure/Date) 

••S pecifications •Reasonableness 

T/•ar• Lea)•( (Signature/Oat 
Facility:•£,•t'• E 

Location:• 

Test Term: 

Page __•L 

Method 

Unit: 

Test No 

Date: 

• Source Test Data Sheet 

Pre-test ,.'0.g0• cfm@• Init. •-• 

Port change cfm @__ INt.__ 

Port change__ cfm @__ INt. 

Post Test •- cf•@ _L(•_•l•i Init. • 

Pitot Leak Check: Pre • Post • 

PRETEST DATA: 

PBar: 

Sample Time 

P static •-CI. •- 

Ambient F •I Pitot Factor 

K3 Factor •3 

Meter No.. 

Meter Factor 

Filter No. O 

Filter Tare 

Cal H@ \. 

Probe 

Nozzle .•. 

Grams/mL 

Impinger No. Post ,,pre o 

5. mL 

Net 

o, Ih,5 

CO•_•__•__ 

MOLE 

Bws 

Stack 

Diagnam 

Point 

q 

•o 

Point 

Layout 

Test Smmnary: Start Time: 

Notes: • rig ,n• 

Meter Conditions 

Time AP •/&P Meter AH Stack Probe Volmne 

Stop Time: 

Temperature 

Oven Imp. Meter In 

Meter 

Vac. Out Out 

D•'!. D £3 13 7• I.o 

aql • 7• q3 •,o 

915 •s ¢o fl• LO 
Location: 

"rest term: 

Page 

Method --• Source Test Data Sheet 

Test No 

Date: 

Pre-test 0. C• % % 

Port change____ 

Port change 

Post Test • 

Pitot Leak Check: 

cfxn @ Init. j, 

cfm @ • Init.,• 

Pre/)j£ •ost 

P Bar: %'1.3 l 

Sample Time _1• 

P static 

Ambient F 

Pitot Factor Q 

K3 Factor •. 

Meter No..2•10 

Meter Factor 

Filter No. ,5"• 

Filter Tare 

C•H• •.•3 

Probe 

Nozzle •- 5 

Grams/mL 

Impinger No. Post, Pre 

5. mL 

6. • 

Net 

co. 

MOLE 

Bws 

Stack 

Diagnam 

Point 

Layout 

Test Smmna,ry: 

Notes: •9 q •. •.• 00• 

Start Time: Time: 

Point Time 

t. 

ll• 

Meter Conditions 

Meter 

AP •/AP AH Volmne 

o.• •..• 

•,.%0 

Temperatm'e 

Imp. Meter 

Stack Probe Oven Meter In Vac. 

Out Out 

•o• • •3 b• qi • 05 
Location'i• Test Team: ¢L'•-•, M•,• 

Test No.._• 

Date: •-t• -o4 

Page._(./ of [' 

PRETEST DATA: 

P Bar.:•2•__. 

Sample Time 

P static OAmbient F• 

Pitot Factor -.•__•,• • 

K3 Factor •;, 

Meter No. • 

Meter Factor 

Filter No. 

Filter Tare • 

Cal. H@ • 

Probe • 

Stack 

Diagram 

Point 

Layout 

Test St•nmary: ..,S•-t Time: Stop Time: 

Meter Conditions 

Point Time AP "4AP AH 

Ni•i!i •ii mi• Voi•mo 

'9,• i• t•.•5 0,.3 

Avg. 

Temperature 

Imp. Meter Meter Vae. 

Stack Probe Oven Out ha Out 

Meter 

Volume 
FIELD DATA SHEET 2 

Velocity Head, Temperature, and Stack Pressure Measurements 

Client/Plant Name •/• Job# 

Test Location/Run # Personnel 

9/30/94:FD2-1 

Note: Ensure that pitot tube is aligned paraflel to the stack or duct axis. 

Pitot Tube ID # 

PitotTube Coefficient (C)_.•__•• 

Ap Gauge Sensitivity 

Barometric Pressure (Pb). (in. Hg) 

Test Location Elevation Difference 

from Bar., (positive if higher) (B) (ft) 

Corr Pb Pb 0+001 B (in. Hg) 

(,/) Piezometer ./j Type S 

Static. F•ressure (Pq) (in. H•O) 0, •: 7 

Post-test Leak Check: Side A 

Pressure Tap Ap (in. H=O) 

Stable for 15 seconds? (yes no) J/' 

Pitot Tube Condition: 

Damaged? 

Post-test Intercomponent Spacing: 

Level/Zero Checks: Mark Pt. #'s with an asterisk__• 

Velocity Traverses 

Start Time: Finish Time: 

Ap Temp. 

in. H20 °F 

OA/QC Check 

Completeness Legibility • Accuracy__ 

Checked by: 

Personnel (signature/Date) 

•icificati•ns _LZ/Reasonableness 

7<•/••/ea m Lead er (Sig n atu "////•/// •/ 

re/Date) 

Summary Table 

Compliance Testing 

Plant 

Location 

ACME BRICK 

Kiln Stack 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Personnel GB• JK• GG• MB• GV 

Job # ABSE100 

Date 

Start 

@ 

DN 

C. 

Y 

PBr 

Test Date 

Run Start Time 

Run Finish Time 

Net Traversing Points 

Net Run Time, minutes 

Nozzle Diameter, inches 

Pitot Tube Coefficient 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 

V 

tm 

Vmstd 

VIc 

Vwstd 

% HzO 

% HzOsat 

ifd 

%CO2 

%02 

% CO+ N2 

Fo 

Md 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf 

Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 

4/12/2006 4/12/2006 4/12/2006 

9:13 11:38 13:58 

11:11 12:54 15:10 

24 24 24 

60 60 60 

0.297 0.297 0.297 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.996 0.996 0.996 

29.97 29.97 29.97 

2.13 2.22 2.20 

49,802 

86.6• 

48.249 

129.1 

6.08 

11.19 

100.( 

i 

Pg 

Ps 

Dry Mole Fraction 

Carbon Dioxide, % 

Oxygen, % 

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 

Fuel Factor 

Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Moie 

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 

47.314 49.192 

78.28 82.05 

46.545 48.066 

119.4 125.7 

5.62 5.92 

10.77 10.96 

100.0 100.0 

APavg 

Vs 

A• 

Qsd 

Oaw 

%1 

Cgr/dscf 

EIb/hr 

HCI ppmw 

HCIppmd 

HCI Ibs/hr 

HF ppmw 

HFppmd 

HF Ibs/hr 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 

Average Velocity Head, inches of H20 

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 

Stack Area, square feet 

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 

Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 

Particulate Concentration, grains/dscf 

Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmw 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmd 

Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmw 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmd 

Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 

0.892 0.890 0.888 

3.00 3.50 3.50 

t6.50 16.50 16.50 

80,5 80.0 80.0 

1.47 1.26 1.26 

29.14 29.22 29.22 

27.94 27.99 27.96 

-0.46 -0.46 -0.46 

29.94 29.94 29,94 

312.8 308.5 310.0 

0.411 0.429 0.423 

44.2 45.1 44,8 

12,436 12.436 12.43( 

20,137 20,598 20,372 

33,012 33,653 33,431 

99.6 100.5 102.0 

29.35 40.65 39.10 

0.0097 0.0131 0.0125 

1.68 2.30 2.18 

11.28 8.40 10,04 

12.64 9.43 11.30 

1.45 1.10 1.3t 

20.03 21.49 25.62 

22.45 24.14 28.85 

1.41 1.55 1.83 

Average 

60 

0.297 

0.840 

0.996 

29.97 

2.18 

48.769 

82•33 

47.620 

124.7 

5.87 

i0•97 

100.0 

0.890 

3,33." 

16;50 

80.2 

1.33 

29.19 

27.97 

-0.46 

29.936 

310•4 

0.421 

44.7 

12.436 

20,369 

33,365 

100,7 

36.37 

0.0118 

2.06 

9.91 

11.13 

1.29 

22.38 

25.14 

1.60 
Plant Acme Brick 

Address Sealy, TX 

Method 1 & 2 

Data Sheet 

Time Date 04.2,0° Fb"A SE100 

29.56 I% moisture 6.0 Ms 28.32 %Oz 17.2, 

-12.2 Fo 2.06 

Location Kiln A Outlet PBr in"Hg 

Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV P static in HzO 

Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port, inches 

Width (if Rectangular) 

Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness, inches 

Diameter, inches 

Equivanlent Diameter (only when rectangular) 

Area in square feet 

60.250 

t2.5 

47.75 

12.44 

Straight Distance before sampling location, inches 

Number of Diameters Before Location* 

Straight Distance after sampling location, inches 

Number of Diameters After Location* 

Enter "P" for Particulates or "V" for velocity 

Minimum Number of Total Points 

Number of Total Points Chosen OK 

Number of Ports OK 

Number of Points per Port OK 

Draw sampling location, plan & top view. 

240.0 

5.0 

300.0 

6.3 

P 

20 

24 

2 

10 

Distance Stack Yaw & Velocity Data 

% Duct from Outside Yaw Angle z•]P Temp Velocity 

Points Depth of Port Degrees inch HzO °F FeetJsec 

A1 2.6% 13.74 0 0.43 313 45.4 

• .8..;.•/• •.•.,.•;z. • .o.• •.•.• •.•.:• 

A3 14.6% t9.47 0 0.50 316 49.1 

• •.:.s..•,/• •.•.•.9. • •:.•! •.• • 

A5 34.2% 28.83 0 0.53 317 50.6 

• .s.•'(• •.•.•.•. • • •.:•.•: •.•:• 

A7 77.4% 49.46 0.460 317 47.1 

A8 85.4% 53.28 0.440 317 46.1 

• •.•.:•'• •.•.,.;• •.:•.• •!.• •.• 

•!..• •.•.o• •..9.•.• •.•.• •.•.• •.•.:•. 

•.• ..z.:.s..°('•. •.•Z•. •.:•..• •J..• •.•..:• 

B2 8.2% 16.42 0.430 315 45.5 

.1•.• !.•.#.."• !..•,.•Z •.•. •.:• •.•.:• 

E•.•: •.• ;•.,.• •.• •.:• •.2..:• 

B.• :•.•,/.• •.•:• •.• •.:• • 

.B.. s. •.:• •.,.•:•. •.:•. •.:• •..:• 

.B..7. "• "•.: •:•(o. •,.•6. •.:4. •..1.• •!.:{•. 

•.• •.: •.(• •,.• •.• •.•.• •. •.:• 

•..9. •.:•'• •.,.;•3 •.• •.•.o. •.•.• 

•.•.•. •(.•,• •,.(• .0..• •..o.• •.•.:.6.. 

Average 0.0 0.423 313,3 45.09 

dscfm 20,676 

Checked By: •Per• (Signature/Date) 

Accuracy 

• QA/QC C eck ./ • • 

Vea•"•der (Signature/Date)• • 
Particulate Data 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Location Kiln Stack 

Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV 

% Moisture 10.8 

Par "Hg 29.97 

H=O -0•46 

K 8.13 

Filter #__ GSC0022 

F/Iter Wt. 

Traver- Elapsed -rime Clock DGM 

Point in Minutes Time Roadin,• 

No, Begin End 24hr f1 

A1 0.0 3.0 9:13:00 AM 645.344 

•.• •.:0. •.• _9.;.!•.;.•.o...A.• •.4"•.! 

A...• r,.:• •.:? •'_..•.•!.•..,•.• •.•. 

IRun No._ 

Equipment ID 

IReag. 

Date 

liS•te 4•[200s Job# Job#ABSE100 

Constants Pre Mid Post ISarnp. A 12.44 Vacuum (in. Hg) 16 16 

IUmbicaf lO0fl Meter box 01112]06 Y DGM 

Meas Stack TC TC 01/12/06 &•l• 1.806 Final DGM 

Meier 10175 Pitot 01/12/01 Cp Leak 0.002 0.007 

Orsat Pump NA Nozzle 01/12]0• ON 0.297 Pitot Good X Good 

Est. Moisture 22.2: gm H•O 119.4 rVI3A 3.0 %coz •lozzle Good X Good 

•alura(adB 100.C' FO= 1.46667 rVIs 27.94• L Md 29.14 

Velocity Stack DGM IOrlficeP Probe Box Filter Imping. Pump 

Temp. Temp. IAH in H,O Temp. Temp. Outlet Temp. Vac. Notes 

31= 71 2.10 2.10 •'"'"'i •'"'"'""i'"'"'"'•'"'""!'"'"'"•"'"'"'i''"'"]':'•'"'"" 

• 314 71.5 2.20 2.2• 300 63 1.0 ....I 

•,• '•.:• •.•=• •.'.•.;.•0..,S.• •.•:.•.. 

•.! !.•.:•. •'[• •.'.•.•.•..•.• •.•.•.. 

•.• •.!.:• • •!,•..•.• •.•:•... 

•.• •.:• •.:• •.'.•!!,•..•.• •.•.•... 

A•.• •!•9. .-•:• •;5•.:.•..•.M •.7.•.•... 

B1 30.0 33.0 43 OOAM 669.92 

B2 33.0 36.0 9:46:00AM 672.16 

B3 36.0 39.0 10 47:30AM 674.83 

B4 39.0 42.0 10:50:30 AM 677,02 

• • •.• • • • •.• 

2.31 2.30 316 64 2.0 

2.10 2.10 319 65 1.8 

!.•. :•.:.•.• • • • E• !.•.• 

1.44 1.43 319 68 1.0 

:•.• :•.,• 28o 6o 1.o 

2.31 2.30 270 59 1.0 

•,.'•.! •:• :•.•0. • • !:.• 

• :•.'• •.•. •=• •.• •? • • • 

2.62 2.61 254 89 1.0 

•:.!• •:•.• 291 60 1.0 

1.69 1.69 255 60 1,0 

•:•? !:.'• •.• • •. •.• •.:.• 

•.• !.•.• • • • • •.•. 

•!.• !.:.!'• • • • • •.• 

Final 11:11 692.658 

Sum avg • 

44.2 I 

22868.3 / 

20136.8 1 

33011.8 • 

•omplcteness 

•hecked By: 

Contents Vol. (mL) Post weigh Pro weight gain 

H20 100 788.8 686.7 102.1 

2 H20 100 621.8 629.8 -8 

E• 0 607,5 596.3 11.2 

4 SG 300 806.3 792.2 14.1 

Legibility 

Probe Rinse 

Filter 

Imp1&2 

Total 

"='•Team Leader (Signature/Date 
Particulate Data 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Address Sealy, TX 

Location Kiln A Outlet 

Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV 

Moisture 11.0 

"Hg 29.97 

HzO -0.46 

5.13 

Meas 

Filter GSC0023 

Filter Wt. 

Traverse Elapsed Time Clock DGM 

Point In Minutes Time Reading 

No. Begin End 24 hr ft 

•.! •:• •.:• !A!•_-.•.• •.•:•.• 

6.2 :•.• •.• •.!..•'!.!.;.•.,•.• •.•.• 

/•.• 6.0 9.0 11:44:00 AM 697.40 

• • !.• !.].•.•.•.•.• •.•:• 

•.• !.•,.• !.•,.q !.•..•;•.•..•.• •.• 

6.•. !.•:.q t•.? !./..•.;•..•.• •.,• 

•.• !.•:.• •.• •.•.•!•.•.• • 

•.• •.:.• •:.• •.•..•.•.•.• •.• 

•.• •.• •.• •.•.'•.!.•.•..• •.•.• 

,•.(• 27.0 30.0 12:05:00 PM 714.98 

E•.;• •.•,9_ •-3.,9 •.•'!.;•..•.• •.!•.=•.•L......[ 

B2 33.0 36.0 12:27:00 PM 718.79 

•.3...i ;•:.q •.• •.•.•.;.•..•.• 

•,• •.•:..o_ •.•,.• •.•.•;•:•.;•.•..•.• •,• 

•.• •2..:.p......[ •.• •.•*•.;.O.•..p•r• •=•.• 

B6 45.0 48.0 12:39:00 PM 729.96 

B7 48.0 51.0 12:42:00 PM 732.69 

Final 

Sum avg 60.0 

•f •,J•;•l 45.1 

• 23134.0 

•s•fm :•] 20598.4 

•a•[ro•l 33653.2 

E•.• 54.0 57.0 12:48:00 PM 

E• •.• •:.• •:. !.•.!•.!.!.•..•.• 

12:54 

735.21 

737,60 

739.94 

•.•:• 

742,094 

aeckedBy: 

•nature/Date) 

Equipment ID 

Reag. Box 

Umbical 

TC 

Meter 

Pump 

Est, Moisture 

Velocity Stack 

Temp. 

AP °F 

...........E•.• • 

•:• • 

•:• •.1.• 

•,.'•.• • 

•,.•.! :•.!.P 

•,.•.• •.? 

•:.•:• :• 

•:• •.• 

•.• • 

•:.•? •. 

•:• • 

•.• •.• 

•.• •.......i 

•:.•.(. •./•.......! 

•..L.... 

•:•.• •..•......I 

0.:'• •.......I 

•:• •..!.......] 

•=•.• •.L...I 

•:.•.• ;]•.•.......I 

IRun No._ 2 

100ft Meter box 

TC Readout 

10175 

Nozzle 

22.21 gm H•O 

DGM 

Temp, 

F 

78.5 

•,.• 

•.•,.• 

.•.•,.• 

•.!.:.• 

•.:•,:,• 

•.:•.:.• 

•:.•,.....,.i 

84.5 

85 

65 

•:•..,....1 

Date •,•00• 

49.192 o.429 3°•'5 62'1 

Checks Pre Mid 

A 12.44 Vacuum 16 16 

01/12/06 Y 0.996 DGM 

•H• Final DGM 

1/12/06 c• Leak 0,003 0.004 

1/12/06 DN 0,297 Pitot Good Good 

125.7 M3A 3:5 '•CO• Good Good 

11,0 16.5 %Oz Good Good 

100.0 Fo= 1.25714 MS 27.991 Md 29.22 

Orifice Pressure Probe Box Filter Imping• Pump 

IAH i,, H20 Temp. Temp• Outlet Temp, Vac. Notes 

Desired IActual oF OF OF °F Hg 

•:.• ;•:• 210 63 o.5 

2.25 2.25 240 55 0.5 

•:•'•, ;•:4.! 240 56 0.5 

2.46 2,46 250 56 0.5 

2.62 2.61 250 58 0.5 

1.95 1.94 248 60 0.5 

1.69 1.69 255 61 0,5 

1.74 1.74 251 64 0.5 

1.54 1.53 254 64 0.5 

•.:•'• •.:.•.• •.......i • • • •:• 

•:.:• •.•:• 257 65 0.5 

2.67 2.66 255 54 0.5 

2.82 2.02 256 53 0,5 

2,92 2,92 255 55 

•:.•..........i.......•.:• • ,57 •:.• 

•:.• •:•.• • • • •:.• 

•:•.• •=.•.• •.• •.• •:.• 

•.:.• •.:•.• •.• •.! ?:.• 

;/.:.• •.:•.• • • • •.! •:• 

H20 100 

H20 100 

Em 0 

SG 300 

Legibility 

797.6 715.6 82.0 Probe Rinse 

640.4 616.6 23.8 Filter 

610.0 602.6 7.4 

801.8 789.3 12.5 Total 

QA/QC 

Accuracy 

Check •S easonablencss 

Team Leader (Signature/Date) 
Particulate Data 

Plant ACM_E BRICK 

Address Sealy, TX 

Location Kiln A Outlet 

Personnel GB, JK, GG, MB, GV 

%Moisture 11,2 

PBr "Hg 29:97 

I•staticin H20 -0.46 

K 5.13 

Filter #__GSC0024 

Filter Wt. 

Meas 

Traven Elapsed Time Clock DGM 

Point In Minutes Time Reading 

No. Begin End 24hr ft 

A1 0.0 3.0 1:58:00 PM 742.327 

A2 3.0 6.0 2:01:00 PM 745.510 

A3 6.0 9.0 2:04:00 PM 74&220 

A4 9.0 12.0 2:07:00 PM 750.970 

,•§ 15.0 18.0 2:13:00PM •.9. 

A7 18.0 21.0 2;16:00 PM 759.310 

A8 21.0 24.0 2:19:00 PM 762.020 

• •:•:• •.•:• •....2.•.!££.•.• •,•=•£ 

•.!.o. •:.• •.o.:• •....•.!£•..•.• -(•:.• 

• •0. •.•.• •.•,!£;£•..•.r• (•:.•.! 

132 33.O 36,0 2:43:00 PM 771.180 

B3 36,0 39.0 46 00 PM 774.930 

IB4 39.0 42.0 2 49 00 PM 776,420 

B5 42.0 45 2:52:00 PM 779.110 

B6 45.0 48.0 2:55:00 PM 782.720 

[37 48.0 51,0 2:58:00 PM 784.340 

• •.•? •.:• •.•£t!•..•.• •.!£ 

• •:? •.•:• •5!£•..•.• •.•.• 

B10 57.0 60.0 3:07:00 PM 790.370 

792.129 

Final 15:1o 

IRun No. 3 

Rea0. Box MS Samp. 

Umblcal 100ft Meier box 01/12/06; 

Stack TC ReadoLr 01/12/0E 

10175 Pilot 01/12/0E 

Pump NA Nozzle 01/12/06 

Est. Moisture 22. gm H20 129.1 

/B::,:= B• 11.2 

100.0 

Velocity 

0.45 

•,.• 

•:.•'• 

•,.• 

•'• 

•.• 

•.• 

•:.• 

•.• 

9:.• 

9:•( 

•:.• 

[Date 4/12/2006 [Job# Job#ABSE100 

Constants Checks Pro Mid 

A= 

&He, 

C• 0.840 

D 0.297 

M3A 3.5 %CO• 

16,5 

•o= 1.25714 

Sum avg • 

•'•%•)• 44,8 

t'¢/i• 22938.0 

•ril •/:•i 20372.3 

• 33431.1 

Vacuum 17 16.5 

Init DGM 

Final DGM 

0.003 0.004 

Good Good 

Nozzle Good Good 

•tack Good Good 

Ms 27.96[ M 29.22 

Notes 

Completeness ,/ / •-.P?• • Legibility • Accuracy 

•IP ,•Sign•u•ate) T¢=n Leader (Signature,•.) 

Contents Vol. (mL, •ost weigh Pro weight gain 

H20 100 779.1 683,3 95.8 

H20' 100 650.4 631,8 18.6 

E• 0 598.5 595.8 2.7 

SG 300 818.3 806.3 12 

49.802 0.423 310"0 86,7 • 

3.• ?... 87.5 1.90 1,89 252 58 0.5 

304 87 1.39 1.38 243 58 0.5 

310 86.5 2.05 2.05 253 62 1.0 

:•.U • •:• •:'• •.• • • •.• •.:.£ 

312 87.5 2.51 51 246 55 1.0 

313 88.5 62 61 257 57 1,0 

313 88.5 67 2.66 254 57 1.0 

311 89 2.21 2.15 256 57 1.0 

310 89.5 1.69 69 251 58 0.5 

310 89.5 1.39 1.38 252 59 0.5 

309 89.5 1.33 1.33 253 60 0.5 

303 90.5 18 17 256 60 0.5 
Acme Brick Particulate Matter Lab Summary Test Bate: 

Sealy. TX April 12, 2006 

Kiln Stack- Outlet 

Run Run Run 

Date 4/12/2006 

Run Start Time 9:13 11:38 13:58 

Run Finish Time 12:54 15:10 

Filter Data 

Run Run Run 

Filter Number 61 52 53 

Final weight (mg) 0.3622 0.3653 0.3667 

Final weight (mg) 0.3622 0.3651 0.3665 

Final weight (rag) 

=ina Filter Weight (rag) 0.3622 0.3652 0.3666 

Filter Tare (rag) 0.3410 0.3391 0.3410 

Filter Tare (mg) 0.3414 0.3390 0.3410 

Filter Tare (rag) 0.3412 0,3391 0.3410 

Probe Rinse (acetone) 

Filter Gain (rag) 21.00 26.15 25.60 

Beaker Number 7 

Volume 191 224 269 293 

Final weight 121.2476 121.1034 121.0374 123.5957 

Final weight 121 2475 121.1032 121,0372 123.5955 

Beaker Gain (mg) 

blank mg/mL 

Gains 

Final Beaker Weight (g) 121.24755 121.1033 121.0373 

Tare Weight (g) 121.2392 121.0889 121.0237 

Tare Weight (g) "21.2392 121.0887 121.0239 

Tare Weight (g) 

Beaker Tare (g) 121.2392 121.0888 121,023•] 

8.35 14.50 13.50 

Probe Rinse 8.35 14.50 13.50 

Filter 21.00 26,15 25.60 

29.35 40.65 39.10 

123.5956 

123.5954 

123.5956 

123.5955 

0.10 

QA/QC Check 

Legibility 

•T•a• •nalure/Date) 

Golden Specialty Consulting, Ltd. Deer Park. TX 
Summary Table 

Compliance Testing 

DLA Inlet 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Location DLA Inlet 

Address Sealy• Texas 

Personnel JK, GG• GB, MB, GV 

ABSE100 

Date 

Start 

Cp 

Y 

PBr 

AH 

t.• 

Vmstd 

Vlc 

Vwstd 

% H•O 

•V•fd 

%CO2 

%02 

% CO+ N2 

Ma 

Pg 

Pa 

ts 

Vs 

Qsd 

HCI ppmw 

HCIppmd 

HCI Ibs/hr 

Test Date 

Run Start Time 

Run Finish Time 

Net Traversing Points 

Net Run Time, minutes 

Pitot Tube Coefficient 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average orifice meter Differential, inches H20 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled actual, acf 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled standard, dscf 

Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 

Dry Mole Fraction 

Carbon Dioxide, % 

Oxygen, % 

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 

Dry Molecular Weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Wet Molecular weight, Ib/Ib-Mole 

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H20 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 

Average Velocity Head; inches of H20 

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 

Stack Area, square feet 

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmw 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmd 

Hydrogen Chloride Emissions, Ib/hr 

HF ppmw Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmw 

HFppmd Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, ppmd 

HF Ibs/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions, Ib/hr 

4/12/2006 

9:10 

10:21 

24 

6O 

0.84 

0.981 

29.97 

1.50 

39.297 

71.25 

38.520 

108.8 

5.12 

11.73 

0.883 

4.00 

14.50 

81.5 

29.22 

27.90 

-0.61 

29.93 

313.8 

0.179 

29.2 

19.147 

20,211 

33,554 

14.27 

16.17 

1.86 

203.72 

230.80 

14.53 

2 3 

4/12/2006 4/12/200( 

11:35 14:00 

12:35 15:00 

24 24 

60 60 

0.84 0.84 

0,981 0.981 

29.97 29.97 

1.50 1.50 

40.053 41.353 

79.50 81.67 

38.660 39.756 

101.6 103.8 

4.78 4.89 

11.01 10.94 

0.890 0.891 

3.50 4.00 

14.50 14.50 

82.0 81.5 

29.14 29.22 

27.91 27.99 

-0.82 -0.78 

29.91 29.91 

328.3 326.7 

0.182 0.186 

29.8 30.1 

19.147 19,147 

20,402 20,643 

34,240 34,546 

20.39 15.44 

22.91 17.34 

2.65 2.03 

169.66 176.68 

190.65 198.39 

12.12 12,76 

Average 

60 

0.84 

0.981 

29.97 

1.50 

40.234 

77:47 

38.979 

104:7 

4.93 

11:23 

0.888 

3.833 

14:500 

81.7 

29.19 

27.94 

-0.74 

29.92 

322;94 

0.182 

29.7! 

19.147 

20,419 

34,113 

16.70 

18.81 

2.18 

183.35 

206.62 

13.14 
Plant Acme Brick 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Location Kiln Stack PBr in"Hg 

Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV P static inH•O 

Method 1 & 2 

Data Sheet 

Date 04/12/06 ABSE100 

29.40 iO/o moisture 11.0 MS 27,99 %Oz 14.5 

-0.31 Fo 1,60 

| Time 

Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port, inches 

Width (if Rectangular) 

Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness, inches 

Diameter, inches 

Equivanlent Diameter (only when rectangular) 

Area in square feet 

66.500 

7.25 

59.25 

19.15 

Straight Distance before sampling location, inches 480.0 

Number of Diameters Before Location* 8.1 

Straight Distance after sampling location, inches 960.0 

Number of Diameters After Location* 16.2 

Enter "P" for Particulates or "V" for velocity p 

Minimum Number of Total Points 12 

Number of Total Points Chosen OK 24 

Number of Ports OK 2 

Number of Points per Port OK 12 

Draw sampling location, plan & top view. 

Distance Stack Yaw & Velocity Data 

% Duct from Outside Yaw Angle AP Temp Velocity 

Points Depth of Port Degrees inch H20 °F FeeUsec 

A1 2.1% 8.49 0 1.20 280 73.0 

A2 6.7% 11.22 0 1.05 279 68.3 

A3 11.8% 14.24 0 1.05 285 68.6 

A5 25.0% 22.06 0 1.20 284 73.2 

A6 35.6% 28.34 0 1.20 283 73.2 

A7 64.4% 45.41 

A8 75.0% 5t.69 

A9 82.3% 56.01 

•,•.• • S.:.•/• .• •,; '•1 

All 93.3% 62.53 

A12 97.9% 65.26 

B1 2.1% 8.49 

B2 6.7% 11.22 

• •..•.•,• !.•,•.• 

B4 17,7% 17.74 

B5 25.0% 22.06 

B6 35.6% 28.34 

• •:M:°#• •,:• 

B8 75.0% 51.69 

B9 82.3% 56.01 

B10 88.2% 59.51 

Btl 93.3% 62.53 

B12 97.9% 65.26 

Average 0.0 1.149 282.7 71.60 

dscfm 51,080 

Leader (Signature/Date) 
Method 1-4 Data 

DLA Inlet 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Location DLA Inlet 

Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV 

% Moisture 11.7 

PBr "Hg 29.97 

P HzO -0.61 

Equipment ID 

Reag. 8ox M5 

Umbical 100ft 

Meas :Stack TC 

Meter box 10175 

Orsat Pump NA 

Est, Moisture 22,2 

IRun No._ 

Date 

Samp. box NA 

Meter box 01/12/06 

TC Readout 1119/06 

=i|ot 1/12/06 

•!ozzle 1/12106 

gm H•O 108.8 

B•asumd 1t.7 

B•=tum•<+ 100.0 

Date "12/200S 

Constants 

Y 0.981 

¢• 0.840 

D 

M3 4.0 %COz 

14.5 %02 

FO 1.6 

[Job # ABSE100 

Checks Pre Mid Post 

Vacuum (in. Hg) 15 10 

Init DGM 

Final DGM 

0.000 0.000 

=itot Good X Good 

klozzle Good X Good 

Stack TC Good X Good 

Me 27.901 M0 29.22 

Traverse Elapsed Time Clock DGM 

Point in Minutes Time Reading 

No, Begin End 24 hr fP 

A1 0.0 5.0 9:10:00 AM 564.714 

A5 20.0 25.0 9:30:00 AM 578.00 

A6 25,0 30.0 9:35:00 AM 581.44 

A7 30.0 35.0 9:40:00 AM 584.73 

•,.• 40.0 45.0 9:50:00 AM 591,47 

B2 

B8 

B9 

R10 

Final 10:21 ;04.011 

Sum avg 

22898.6 

20211.5 

i| 33554.3 

Checked By: • 

Velocity Stack DGM 

Temp. Temp. 

AP °F °F 

£4 ;+• •,•+ 

•::+.++ • • 

•4.•. •2. •.• 

£,J.• •q 

£:• 318 

£• •.!,•. 

•:• •. 

AHin H+O Temp: Setup. °ut'et Temp" vec. Note',, 

C, esire,• l,",o,oa, o• F °• °t• 

•.: • p. 1',•£ 67 2.9 

:t:•.P. !•.• :%..] • • •?• •,.• 

!.:A• !,.•? • •: ?. •+• •,• 

1.50 1.50 68 2.0 

1.50 1.50 44 

1,50 1.50 44 2.0 

1.50 1.50 45 2+0 

1.50 1.50 47 2.0 

0.17 328 

0.09 328 

Contents VoL (mL) Post Weight Pre weight gain 

H20 100 828,2 738.0 90.2 

2 H20 100 693.8 687.3 6.5 

3 Dry 0 629,1 623.6 5.5 

4 SG 871.9 865.3 6.6 

QA/QC Check 

Legibility Accuracy 

•-. 

Reasonableness 

Team Leader(Signature/Date) 
Method 1-4 Data DLA Inlet 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Location Kiln Stack 

Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV 

Moisture 11.0 

IPBr in"Hg 29;97 

HtO -0.82 

LFilt WI. 

Traverse 

Point 

No, 

A1 

A2 

•9 

Elapsed Time Clock 

In Minutes Time 

Begin End 24 hr 

0.0 5.o 11:35:OOAM 

6.0 10.0 11:40:00AM 

10.0 15.0 11:45:00AM 

15.0 20.0 11:50:00 AM 

20.0 25.0 11:55:00AM 

25.0 30.0 12:00:00 PM 

30.0 35.0 12:05:00 PM 

35.0 40.0 12:10:00 PM 

40.0 45.0 12:15:00PM 

Meas 

IRun No._ 

Equipment ID Cal Date 

Box M5 Samp. box 

100ft Meter box 

8tack TC TC Readout 

6ox 10175 Pitot 

Pump NA Nozzle 

IEst. • "•,2 gm H20 

Date 4/12/2006 Job# ABSE100 

Constants Checks Pre Mid Post 

NA A, 19.1 

01112/06 Y 0.981 

01/12/06 ,',1• t.781 

1/12/o6 C• 0,940 

1/12/06 DN 

101,6 M3 3.5 %COz 

11.0 14.5 %Oz 

100.0 Fo= 1.82857 

Velocity Stack DGM Odfice Pressure Probe Box 

Temp, Temp. •H in }-[20 Temp. Temp. 

,•p o17 o17 Desired Actual E °F 

•/acuum 15 15 

nit DGM 

Final DGM 

_eak rate 0.005 0,004 

Pitot Good Good 

Iozzle Good Good 

tack TC Good Good 

Ms 27.911 M, 29.14 

Notes 

DGM Filter Imping. Pump 

Reading Outlet Temp. Vac. 

f•3 F °F Hg 

607,858 

611.50 

0..::•.'• • • 1.60 1.50 69 2.0 

0.12 297 78 1.50 1.50 42 2.0 

014.02 0.10 aoo 78 1.50 t.50 43 2.0 

617.92 0.21 311 79 1,50 1.50 44 2.0 

621.40 0.23 317 79 1.50 1.50 45 2.0 

624.90 0:24 327 80 1.50 1.50 47 2.0 

528.25 0.19 3al 80 1.50 1.50 4• •.0 

631,67 0.23 333 80 1,50 1.50 48 2.0 

63S.02 0.2• 334 80 1.50 a.50 50 2.0 

A10 45,0 50.0 12:20:00 PM 638.40 0.22 335 80 1.50 1.50 50 2.0 

All 50.0 55.0 12:25:00 PM 641,52 16 335 81 1.50 1.50 51 2.0 

A12 55.0 60.0 12:30:00 PM 6•.73 0,11 335 81 1.50 1.50 51 2.0 

B3 0.16 330 

B4 o.,6 aaa 

o.• 334 

•.• 

•7 z4 343 

B8 0.27 3• 

B10 0.28 346 

B12 •:..•.• •..•..• 

Contents Vol, (mL• Post weigh Pre weight gain 

Final 12:35 647.911 

H20 100 603.1 718,6 84.5 Probe Rinse 

H20 160 702.9 B93,9 9 Filter 

Dry 625.8 625.1 0.7 Impinger Catch 

4 SG 300 937.3 929.9 7.4 Total 

Completeness 

• • 

Legibility 

J QA]QC Check • Accuracy Specifi ca[ion.§.• Re•sonabl 

Checked By: 

Team (Signature/Date) 

Ib/mmBTU 29.8 

22925.8 

20402.1 

34239,5 
Method 1-4 Data DLA Inlet 

Plant ACME BRICK 

Address Sealy, Texas 

Location Kiln Stack 

Personnel JK, GG, GB, MB, GV 

% Moisture 10,9 

Per "Hg 29.97 

HzO -0,78 K 

Filter 

Filter Wt. 

Umbi(iiuipment ID 

Reag. Box M5 

100ft 

Meas Stack TC 

IMeter box 1017{ 

IOrsat Pump NA 

!Est. Moisture 22.2 

[Run No., 3 

Cal 

Samp. box NA 

Meter box 01112106 

TC Readoul 

Nozzle 01/12/06 

gm H•O 103.8 

B 10.9 

B•u•=•d 100 

Date 4/12/2006 [Job# ABSE100 

Constants 

As 19.1 

Y 0.981 

D 

Checks Pre Mid Post 

Vacuum 15 10 

Init DGM 

Final DGM 

Leak 0.005 0.000 

M3 4.0 %CO= 

14.5 

Fo= 1.6 

Pitot Good Good 

•ozzle Good Good 

Stack TC Good Good 

MS 27.99J Md 29,22 

Travers Elapsed Time Clock DGM Velocily 

Point In Minutes Time Reading 

No. Begin End 24 hr ft 

A1 0.0 5.0 2:00:00 PM 648.258 0.06 

• •:• !,•9 •.,q•..•.•.• •.•.!.•.q •::•.• 

• •:• !.•P •!.!•!.•.•.• •.•:•.• o..::•,• 

• •.0.: 9 •..s.• •..-•;.q,o..•.• •,•:!.•9 •:• 

.% ;•.•:9 •.9:.0. •;.•;.o.•.,•.• •.•: .s.•.• ,o.:• 

"• •.•:? ?.P.:• •!•!,•.•.M P.•.•:•.• •:• 

,• :•.•:.• •P=• ;•!.•!.•.•.•.....•.•:•P •:• 

A9 40.0 45.0 2:40:00 PM 675.900 0.24 

• •.• •:L...i..,...•.•...P •!•!.•,•.• •:,•P •:•. 

•..• •9:•....:i......•.s.:.• •;.•,o..-'9•..•.• •.•:•[• •::•.• 

•-•.• •:.o. •p:.p •!.•;.•.•.• •.•:•.p .o.:•.p. 

.a.•. •o,.:• .•p.•;.o,,.o,.•.•.. .•.•.•:•:•.• •::/.:• 

• o..::•.s., 

B3 0.14 

B5 0.21 

B6 0.16 

B7 0.24 

B8 0.28 

B10 0.24 

Bll 0.16 

Final 15:00 •89.611 

°F °F IDesired Actua• °F o• o• o• "• 

309 79 1,50 1.50 51 2,0 

313 79 1.50 1.50 54 2.0 

311 80 1.50 1.50 56 0 

•'•.• •'• "•.:•.• •1.:• • 57 2.0 

314 

•.!.•. 

323 

33O 

331 

331 

335 

339 

343 

343 

Contents Vol, (mL', =ost weigh Preweight gain 

H20 100 778,1 699.3 78.8 

2 H20 100 715.4 702,9 12.5 

34545.8 3 Dry 628.4 625.8 2,6 

B•U/tt•:q 4 SG 947.2 937.3 9.9 

QA/QC Check 

Completeness Legibilily Accuracy 

Personnel (Sign•) Team Leader(Signature/Date) 

Ehecked By: 

2813461159 Acme Brick Company SFP 

FULL 

1/3 

2/3 

FULL 

1/3 

213 

FULL 

1/3 

FUI.J. 

1/3 

Z/3 

FULL 

1/3 

•J3 

FU ,U• 

1/3 

•3 

FULL 

I/3 

FULL 

1/3 

1/3 

2/3 

FULL 

1/3 

213 

FULL 

I/3 

FULL 

2/3 

FULL 

1/3 

2t3 

FULL 

41t3 O:'M/ :40 

4/13 0:38:20 2t3 

4Pl 3 • ;05:00 FU• 

4I• 3 • :3• :40 •/3 

•I3 •:58:20 •3 

•13 2:25:• 

•I•3 2:51:40 

•13 3:t8:20 

•3 3;45:• 

•t3 •:38:20 

•13 5:05:• FU• 

•13 5:58:20 
04/1t/2006 NON i4:12 FAX 2813461159 Acme Brick Company SFP 

SCRUBBER EXHAUST •ADING8 

12q'LET 

9:ISAM 

9:30A2VI 

9:45A•M 

10:00•2V[ 

lO:15AM 

11 :O0•kIVi 

II:ISAM 

1130A, IVI 

11:45AM 

12:00PM 

12;15Pik/i 

12:30PM 

12:45PM 

I:00PM 

1 :tStr/vI 

I:30PM 

1:45PM 

2:00PM 

2:15PM7 

2"•OPM 

2:45PM 

• :OOPM 

.g 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.g 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.g 

.g 

.8 

.8 

.g 

-8 

.8 

,8 

.8 

.8 

.8 

.8 

April 12, 2006 

OUTLET 

1,4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

!.4 

1.4 

I..4 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

i.4- 

1.4 

1.4 

1.4 

1,4 
To: Bob Boting 

From: CYaig Moflock 

Subject: Lime Weight per Cycle 

Da|c: 4-i 2-06 

On 4-12-06 Frank emptied the I/me hopper, then weighed the hopper empty and waited for •he scrubber to cycle 2 times and reweighe•l the hopper again @ 119ibs /2 cycles is 49•5 tbs per cycle. 

The Kiln firemen empty the hopper every third full push ( nine scrubber cycles), this e•asures fl•at the scrubber runs on a constant 

cycle rate of 114 lbs per hour or 2,741.52 lhs per 2.4 hours. 

PARTICULATES LOG 

CLIENT: Acme Brick-Sealy-TX 

PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSE'i01 

DATE: April •9, 2006 

FILTER TYPE: Glass Microfibre 

FILTER ID 

GSL060058-0002 

GSL060058-0005 

GSL060058•008 

CLIENT ID 

DLA-OUT-2 

DLAOUT-5 

LAB NO. 

000051 

000052 

iNITIAL 

WEIGHT 

0.3412 

0.3391 

FINAL WEIGHT 

0.3622 

0.3652 

DLAOUT-8 000053 0.3410 0.3666 

931 Seaco Court ® Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898 • Fax (281)476-9876 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX 

PROJECT NO :GSL060058/GSC06AB SE 101 

MEDIA:Glass Microfibre Filter 

RECEIVING DATE:4/14/2006 

ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 

REPORT DATE:4/19/2006 

GSL060058-0002 

GSL060058-0005 

GSL060058-0008 

51 

52 

53 

21.00 

26.10 

25.60 

Claudio de Vera 

Analyst 

Sidney Bonnette 

QC Coordinator 
PARTICULATES LOG 

CLIENT: Acme Brick-Sealy-T× DATE: A=£Eil 19, 2_006 

PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSEo'•01 MEDIA: ACETONE 

SAMPLE ID CLIENT 

GSL060058-0001 DLAOUT-1 

GSL060058-0004 DLAOUT-4 

GSL060058-0007 DLAOUT-7 

GSL060058-0010 DLAOUT-B1 

LAB VOLUME 

NO. (ml) 

Beaker 

4 191 

INITIAL 

WEIGHT 

FINAL 

WEIGHT 

121.2392 121.2476 

Beaker 224 121.0888 121.1033 6 

Beaker 269 121.0238 121.0373 7 

Beaker 293 123.5955 123.5956 8 

931 Seaco Court ® Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898 ® Fax (281)476-9876 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX 

PROJECT NO:GSL060058/GSC06ABSE101 

MEDIA:Acetone 

RECEIVING DATE:4/14/2006 

ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 

REPORT DATE:4/19/2006 

GSL060058-0001 Beaker 4 8.40 

GSL060058-0004 Beaker 6 14.50 

GSL060058-0007 Beaker 7 13.50 

GSL060058-0010 Beaker 8 0.10 

Claudio de Vera 

Analyst 

Sidney Bonnette 

QC Coordinator 
SPEC|ALTY LABORATORY, LTD, 

PARTICULATES LOG 

CLIENT: Acrne Brick-Sealy=TX 

PROJECT: GSL060058/GSC 06ABSE=101 

DATE: April !.9, 2006 

MEDIA: H=•O 

SAMPLE ID CLIENT iD 

GSL060058-0003 DLAOUT-3 

GSL060058-0006 DLAOUT-6 

LAB 

NO. 

Beaker 

9 

Beaker 

10 

Beaker 

11 

VOLUME 

(mi) 

244 

232 

INITIAL 

WEIGHT 

1 O3.1546 

100.4591 

FINAL 

WEIGHT 

103.1608 

100.4622 

GSL060058-0009 DLAOUT-9 228 104.201 1 104.2149 

Beaker GSL060058-0012 DLAOUT-B2 235 121.5945 121.5946 12 

931 Seaco Court o Deer Park, TX 77536 Phone (281)476-9898 • Fax (281)476-9876 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

CLIENT:ACME Brick Sealy, TX 

PROJECT NO:GSL060058/GSC06ABSE101 

MEDIA:H20 

RECEIVING DATE:4/14/2006 

ANALYSIS DATE:4/18-4/19/2006 

REPOR]- DATE:4/19/2006 

GSL060058-0003 Beaker 9 6.20 

GSL060058-0006 Beaker 10 3.10 

GSL060058-0009 Beaker 11 

•SL060058-0012 Beaker 12 

13.80 

0.10 

Claudio de Vera 

Analyst 

Sidnev•Bo•n: £ 

QC Coordinator 

L: L: 

• o 

[] [] 

eoueq•osqv 
0 

0 

0 •0 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 

e0ueqJ0sqv 
eoueqJosq v 

< 

W 
0 

0 

d 

d d o o d d o d • d • 

eoueqJosqv 
0 

W 
o 

o 

0 

0 

eoueqJosqv 

Gas 

Surrogate 

Date 

Facility 

Location 

HCI Cylinder 

SF6 Cylinder 

Spike 1 

SF6 Stack 

Baseline 

DF 

Predicted 

Over 

Under 

Actual 

% Recovery 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

April 11, 2006 

ACME Brick 

Sealy, Texas 

298 

4 

0.41 

16.07 

9.76 

46.61 

60.59 

32.63 

34.67 

74.38 

Pass 

Spiking 

Spike 2 

SF6 Stack 

Baseline 

DF 

Predicted 

Over 

Under 

Actual 

0.41 

17.37 

9.76 

47.91 

62.28 

33.54 

36.64 

76.48 

Pass 

Spike 2 

SF6 Stack 

Baseline 

DF 

Predicted 

Over 

Under 

Actual 

0.40 

18.83 

10.00 

48.63 

63.22 

34.04 

37.87 

77.87 

Pass 

Average 

0:41 

17.42 

9.84 

47.72 

62.03 

33.40 

36.39 

76.24 

Pass 
Spiking Raw Data 

# methodFile(s) C:\l\Methods•ACME3.method 

SF6 HCl 

4/12/2006 2:18 0.00 17.62 

4/12/2006 2:20 0.00 17.23 

4/12/2006 2:22 0.00 16.42 

4/12/2006 2:24 0.00 16.07 

4/12/2006 2:26 0,00 16.09 

4/12/2006 2:28 0.00 16.35 

0.00 16.17 

4/12/2006 2:30 0.04 15.98 

4/12/2006 2:32 0.37 18.34 

4/12/2006 2:34 0.41 26.87 

4/12/2006 2:36 0.42 29.97 

4/12/2006 2:38 0.42 31.47 

4/12/2006 2:40 0.42 32.75 

4/12/2006 2:42 0.41 35.29 

4/12/2006 2:44 0.42 34.49 

4/12/2006 2:46 0.41 34.99 

4/12/2006 2:48 0.41 34.51 

0,41 34.67 

4/12/2006 2:50 0,18 24.58 

4/12/2006 2:52 0.01 17.69 

4/12/2006 2:54 0.00 16.06 

4/12/2006 2:56 0.00 16.05 

4/12/2006 2:58 0.00 16.27 

4/12/2006 3:00 0.00 15.81 

4/12/2006 3:02 0.00 15.80 

0.0O 15.96 

4/12/2006 3:04 0.03 15.14 

4/12/2006 3:06 0.36 20.69 

4/12/2006 3:08 0.41 29.82 

4/12/2006 3:10 0.41 32.83 

4/12/2006 3:12 0.41 34.41 

4/12/2006 3:14 0.41 35.91 

4/12/2006 3:16 0.41 37.35 

4/12/2006 3:18 0.41 36.51 

4/12/2006 3:20 0.41 36.58 

4/12/2006 3:22 0.41 36.83 

0.41 36.64 

4/12/2006 3:24 0.19 27.46 

4/12/2006 3:26 0.01 19.02 

4/12/2006 3:28 0.00 18.23 

4/12/2006 3:30 0.00 16.22 

4/12/2006 3:32 0.00 15.75 

4/12/2006 3:34 0.00 18.84 

4/12/2006 3:36 0.00 18.90 

4/12/2006 3:38 0.00 18.56 

O.0O 18.77 

Baseline 

Spike 1 

Baseline 

Spike 2 

Baseline 
4/12/2006 3:40 

4/12/2006 3:42 

4/12/2006 3:44 

4/12/2006 3:46 

4/12/2006 3:48 

4/12/2006 3:50 

4/12/2006 3:53 

4/12/2006 3:55 

4/12/2006 3:57 

4/12/2006 3:59 

4/12/2006 4:01 

4/12/2006 4:03 

4/12/2006 4:05 

4/12/2006 4:07 

SF6 

0.24 

0.40 

0.40 

0.40 

0.40 

0.40 

0.40 

0.16 

0.02 

0.03 

0.00 

0,00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

HCl 

23.40 

33.40 

36.12 

36.66 

38.04 

38.91 

37.87 

27.25 

19.57 

18.59 

15.68 

18.36 

18.85 

18.83 

18.99 

18.89 

Spike 3 

Baseline 



!i II 


Run 1 0900-1026 

Timestamp 

4/12/2006 9:00 

4/12/2006 9:02 

4112/2006 9:04 

4/12/2006 9:06 

4/12/2006 9:08 

4/12/2006 9:10 

4/12/2006 9:12 

4/12/2006 9:14 

4/12/2006 9:16 

4/12/2006 9:18 

4/12/2006 9:20 

4/12/2006 9:22 

4/12/2006 9:24 

4/12/2006 9:26 

4/12/2006 9:28 

4/12/2006 9:30 

4/12/2006 9:32 

4/12/2006 9:34 

4/12/2006 9:36 

4/12/2006 9:38 

4/12/2006 9:40 

4/12/2006 9:42 

4/12/2006 9:44 

4/12/2006 9:46 

4/12/2006 9:48 

4/12/2006 9:50 

4/12/2006 9:52 

4/12/2006 9:54 

4/12/2006 9:56 

4/12/2006 9:58 

4/12/2006 10:00 

4/12/2008 10:02 

4/12/2006 10:04 

4/12/2006 10:06 

4/12/2006 10:08 

4/1212006 10:10 

4/12/2006 10:12 

4/12/2006 10:14 

4/12/2008 10:16 

4/12/2006 t 0:18 

4/12/2006 10:20 

4/12/2006 10:22 

4/12/2006 10:24 

4/12/2006 10:26 

Averages 

Inlet FTIR Data 

HCI HCIError HF HFError HCI 

17.86 0.44 280.18 3.67 14.11 

18.23 0.45 288.81 3.61 14.92 

19.30 0.55 296.39 4.43 15.18 

19.97 0.55 289.09 3.74 16.05 

19.89 0.60 289.17 4.26 15.97 

19.94 0.56 288.60 5.16 16.56 

20.33 0.56 294.37 5.12 17.44 

19,12 0.57 282.13 4.11 18.39 

17.72 0.47 236,04 3.36 18.69 

18.05 0.48 223.84 3.12 18.11 

16.59 0.43 202.82 3.09 16.50 

15.23 0.41 207.22 3.16 14.85 

14.57 0.40 211.25 3.23 15.48 

14.71 0.41 221.07 2.70 16.01 

14.11 0.40 213.62 2.76 16.21 

13.65 0.39 213.37 2,72 15.83 

14.69 0.40 223.79 2.74 15.79 

14.45 0.39 208.58 2.74 15.79 

14.22 0.39 212.64 2.74 16.36 

14.05 0.38 211.19 2.78 15.69 

14.26 0.42 215.51 2.71 14.77 

12.15 0.37 193.31 2.64 14.59 

15.50 0.41 218.64 2.71 14.06 

13.65 0.39 172.59 2.68 13.27 

12.75 0.35 169.91 2.63 12.06 

12.42 0.37 166.03 2.61 3.96 

11.51 0.44 162.08 2.65 0.97 

11.53 0.41 165.11 2.59 0.64 

11.59 0.39 164.10 2.66 2.89 

11.64 0.39 166.25 2.57 6.92 

11.83 0.41 170.39 2.66 6.70 

12.22 0.38 175.95 2.68 6,52 

12.58 0.39 176.95 2.69 6.32 

13.03 0.39 182.13 2.67 6.69 

11.65 0.38 165.10 2.52 6.77 

11.56 0.43 180,71 2.68 6.69 

12.45 0.37 168.68 2.67 6.65 

11.21 0.39 140.90 2.50 5.88 

10.13 0.35 131.75 2.47 6.39 

9.51 0.39 127.95 2:42 6.50 

10.61 0.40 141.49 2.51 6.28 

11.32 0.39 156.99 2.59 6.00 

12,69 0.45 184.22 2.67 5.68 

13.65 0.37 172.77 2.35 5.26 

14.27 0.42 203.72 2.99 11.28 

Outlet FTIR Data 

HCIError HF 

0.46 25.09 

0,46 27.04 

0.78 28.39 

0.86 26.67 

0.85 28.84 

0.83 28.15 

0.86 29.25 

0.87 31.18 

0.86 29.35 

0.86 30,92 

0.79 25,55 

0.52 24.8O 

0.80 24.52 

0.78 28.88 

&78 29.49 

0.80 31.12 

0.78 28.16 

0,78 28.85 

0.78 29.58 

0.77 28.45 

0.76 27.94 

0.44 26.80 

0.43 26.38 

0.42 26.14 

0.39 23.92 

0.21 6.77 

0.09 2.11 

0.08 1.36 

0.17 3.26 

0.42 13.12 

0.39 12.36 

0.27 11.79 

0.27 10.81 

0.28 11.75 

0.28 12.57 

O.40 11.98 

0.38 11.72 

0.26 10.22 

0.28 10.87 

0.27 11.08 

0.27 10.16 

0.28 10.58 

0.29 11.99 

0.28 11.25 

0.52 20.03 

HFError 

0.91 

1.01 

1.01 

0.96 

0.98 

0.95 

0.99 

0.92 

0.91 

1.01 

0.90 

0.84 

0.89 

0.94 

0.92 

1.02 

0.94 

0.95 

0.93 

0.91 

0.95 

0.92 

0.89 

0.91 

0.82 

0.41 

0.13 

0.13 

0.15 

0.53 

0.54 

0.55 

0.53 

0.53 

0.53 

0.51 

0.50 

0.46 

0.48 

0.49 

0.50 

0.51 

0.53 

0.51 

0.72 
Run 2 1134-1252 Inlet FTIR Data 

Timestamp HCI HCIError HF HFError 

4/12/2006 11:34 10.33 0.42 120.97 1.03 

4/12/2006 11:36 12.61 0.37 126,62 1.08 

4/12/2006 11:38 12.30 0.39 126.65 1.08 

4/12/2006 11:40 13.02 0.37 135.46 2.58 

4/12/2006 11:42 12.77 0.38 138.34 2.59 

4/12/2006 11:44 13.09 0.40 141.12 2.59 

4/12/2006 11:46 13.80 0.40 165.09 2.69 

4/12/2006 11:48 18.87 0.46 296.85 5.71 

4/12/2006 11:50 22.77 0.56 301.55 5.49 

4/12/2006 11:52 24.38 0.63 267.65 4.31 

4/12/2006 11:54 24.82 0.64 245.67 3.54 

4/12/2006 11:56 21.82 0.64 171.00 2.47 

4/12/2006 11:58 24.43 0.64 201.91 2.73 

4/12/2006 12:00 24.12 0.63 191.43 2.73 

4/12/2006 12;02 23.75 0.62 185.73 2.78 

4/12/2006 12:04 23.13 0.62 177.27 2.77 

4/12/2006 12:06 23.21 0.57 171.99 2.73 

4/12/2006 12:08 23.11 0.64 171.46 2.69 

4/12/2006 12:10 23.42 0.61 170.86 2.65 

4/12/2006 12:12 24.12 0.61 173.98 2.66 

4/12/2006 12:14 24.67 0.58 174.10 2.72 

4/12/2006 12:16 24.95 0.62 173.69 2.65 

4/12/2006 12:18 25.15 0.64 176.11 2.64 

4/12/2006 12:20 25.12 0.65 175.83 2.62 

4/12/2006 12:22 20.00 0.55 127.26 2.40 

4/12/2006 12:24 22.65 0.58 148.82 2.53 

4/12/2006 12:26 23.20 0.57 153.15 2.59 

4/12/2006 12:28 22.64 0.57 153.51 2.59 

4/12/2006 12:30 21.85 0.61 152.11 2.61 

4/12/2006 12:32 21.99 0.61 153.64 2.60 

4/12/2006 12:34 21.91 0.56 153.90 2.61 

4/12/2006 12:36 21.80 0.56 156.62 2.58 

4/12/2006 12:38 21.99 0.57 159.33 2.57 

4/12/2006 12:40 21.77 0.60 157.98 2.59 

4/12/2006 12:42 18.78 0.55 156.24 2.61 

4/12/2006 12:44 18.95 0.43 155.98 2.55 

4/12/2006 12:46 19.04 0.43 159.30 2.63 

4/12/2006 12:48 16.46 0.39 137.23 2.50 

4/12/2006 12:50 16.17 0.43 135.81 2.55 

4/12/2006 12:52 16.78 0.41 144.22 2.62 

Averages 20.39 0.54 169,66 2.72 

Run 3 1355-1508 Inlet FTIR Data 

Timestamp HCI HCIError HF HFError 

4/12/2006 13:55 13.00 0.39 127.39 0.97 

4/12/2006 13:57 12.73 0.39 133.77 2.44 

4/12/2006 13:59 13.12 0.35 131.43 2.43 

4/12/2006 14:01 12.92 0.43 131.86 2.48 

4/12/2006 14:03 12.26 0.35 124.79 1.02 

4/12/2006 14:05 11.65 0.41 126.85 1.04 

Outlet FTIR Data 

HCI HClError HF HFError 

7.42 0.47 

7.83 0.71 

8,39 0.51 

8.37 0.48 

8.93 0.41 

8.89 0.42 

8.79 0.41 

8.08 0.47 

7.88 0.47 

7.85 0.48 

8.01 0.47 

7.87 0.47 

7.48 0.46 

7.64 0.45 

7.36 0.49 

7.60 0.46 

7.47 0.45 

7.42 0.45 

7.41 0.45 

7.61 0.47 

7.69 0.46 

6.12 0.26 

1.56 0.12 

0.71 0.11 

0.53 0.10 

1.74 0.15 

7.64 0.43 

9.39 0.41 

10.80 0.41 

11.29 0,41 

11.40 0.40 

11.53 0.41 

12.08 0.41 

12.73 0.43 

12.66 0.42 

12.24 0.43 

12.25 0.43 

12.03 0.43 

12.00 0.43 

11.42 0.41 

8.40 0.41 

26.17 

28.70 

28.06 

27.84 

28.44 

27.22 

26.34 

24.06 

25.20 

25.70 

25.09 

25.25 

24.61 

24.30 

24.75 

23.66 

23.76 

22.63 

22.85 

27.12 

26.33 

19.00 

4.87 

2.02 

1.42 

2.49 

15.17 

18.28 

21.79 

21.35 

22.12 

22.37 

22.30 

23.66 

22.11 

21.71 

20.77 

21.21 

19.96 

19.12 

21.49 

0.92 

0.93 

0.94 

0.95 

0.98 

0.98 

0.95 

0.94 

0.95 

1.00 

0.96 

0.98 

0.96 

0.94 

0.92 

0.93 

0.91 

0.61 

0.60 

1.00 

0.96 

0.53 

0.19 

0.13 

0.14 

0.16 

0.46 

0.52 

0.60 

0.60 

0.62 

0.62 

0.63 

0.98 

0.61 

0.61 

0.62 

0.63 

0.59 

0.57 

0.73 

Outlet FTIR Data 

HCI HCIError HF HFError 

9.48 0.39 19.92 0.62 

9.51 0.39 19.99 0.62 

9.86 0.39 21.70 0.61 

9.69 0.41 26.98 1.06 

11.03 0.42 29.46 1.02 

10.31 0.41 29.95 1.04 
4/12/2006 14:08 11.52 0.38 128.20 1.01 

4/12/2006 14:10 10.44 0.39 115.21 0.98 

4/12/2006 14:12 12.24 0.43 112.31 1.01 

4/12/2006 14:14 11.38 0.36 118.29 1.01 

4/12/2006 14:16 11.45 0.39 126.12 1.04 

4/12/2006 14:18 11.24 0.40 133.32 2.41 

4/12/2006 14:20 12.23 0.40 150.89 2.46 

4/12/2006 14:22 13.16 0.38 169.73 2.63 

4/12/2006 14:24 13.90 0.41 180.77 2.65 

4/12/2006 14:26 15.54 0.39 215.69 2.73 

4/12/2006 14:28 16.27 0.44 226.69 3.46 

4/12/2006 14:30 17.58 0.41 250.03 3.57 

4/12/2006 14:32 18.94 0.40 268.25 4.04 

4/12/2006 14:34 19.04 0.54 275.91 4.04 

4/12/2006 14:36 16.43 0.42 197.54 2.45 

4/12/2006 14:38 19.58 0.60 207.02 2.55 

4/12/2006 14:40 19.31 0.57 209.23 2.54 

4/12/2006 14:42 18.51 0.56 198.88 2.58 

4/12/2006 14:44 18.23 0.45 193.18 2.48 

4/12/2006 14:46 18.25 0.40 188.84 2.55 

4/12/2006 14:48 17.70 0.42 186.58 2.55 

4/12/2006 14:50 17.36 0.42 185.80 2.55 

4/12/2006 14:52 17.32 0.39 193.22 2.55 

4/12/2006 14:54 17.28 0.42 196.10 2.59 

4/12/2006 14:56 17.44 0.38 200.46 2.60 

4/12/2006 14:•J8 18.48 0.47 213.26 2.65 

4/12/2006 15:00 18.50 0.41 218.75 2.69 

4/12/2006 15:02 15.51 0.39 176.92 2.43 

4/12/2006 15:04 16.64 0.39 171.88 2.53 

4/12/2006 15:06 17.33 &44 176.10 2.68 

4/12/2006 15:08 16.71 0.42 175.92 2.56 

Averages 15.44 0.42 176.68 2.35 

8.86 

7.83 

989 

12.20 

13.51 

13.65 

13.92 

14.27 

13.63 

7.04 

1.26 

0.75 

4.13 

7.04 

7.44 

9.04 

10.60 

11.25 

11.67 

11.88 

11.57 

11.65 

11.68 

11.94 

11.46 

11.13 

11.15 

10.20 

9.74 

10.67 

10.75 

10.04 

0.41 

0.49 

0.53 

0.52 

0,47 

0.46 

0.46 

0.46 

0.46 

0.36 

0.12 

0.11 

0.29 

0.45 

0.45 

0.47 

0.47 

0.47 

0.45 

0.43 

0.43 

0.42 

0.42 

0.41 

0.42 

0.41 

0.41 

0.38 

0.39 

0.37 

0.39 

0.41 

26.63 

25.34 

33.41 

35.67 

35.39 

31.47 

35.00 

31.74 

31.96 

15.00 

3.96 

2.35 

9.94 

20,72 

23.90 

29.77 

32.52 

32.13 

32.63 

31.05 

30.24 

28,02 

31.60 

25.26 

27.73 

25.33 

24.70 

21.14 

20.25 

22.08 

22.96 

25.62 

1.07 

1.01 

1.13 

1.08 

1.00 

0.97 

1.13 

1.01 

1.11 

0.44 

0.13 

0.12 

0.45 

0.63 

0.92 

0.99 

1.02 

1.04 

1.06 

1.05 

1.05 

0.94 

1.12 

0.89 

1.06 

0.99 

0.98 

0.57 

0.54 

0.60 

0.61 

0.86 

acme3 

Imacc Quant Method: 

filename C:\l\Methods\ACME3.method 

shift Information: 

shift-reference Z:\Methods\hf-150.spa start 4000 

stop 4300 

maxdela# 10 

interpolate-count 10 

shift-count 10 

Quant Information: 

digit-tolerance 3 

data-size-tolerance 5 

use-dynamic-references true 

use-bias false 

use-radiance false 

report-zero true 

References: 

set-filename 

Acetaldehyde, 

co2, 

HF, 

SF6, 

H20, 

Hcl, 

Z:\Methods\Acetaldehyde 22.4 ppm 770_1_185.SPA z:\Methods\co2-2Ok.spa Z:\Methods\HF6.0ppm.spa Z:\Methods\SF6_384.SPA Z:\Methods\h2o5%-78m. SPA 

Z:\Linearity Sets\Hcl\hcl-lppm-25C.SPA 

code shortname pres(Torr) temp(C) conc(ppm) pathlength(m) 

Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde 22.4 ppm 

1 

co2 co2-20k 760 185 20000 

HF HF6.0ppm 650 185 6 

SF6 SF6_384 750 185 101 

H20 h2o5%-78m 755 185 50000 

HCl hcl-1ppm-25C 760 185 1 

770_1_185 770 185 22.4 

i0 

25.1 

3°8 

78 

I0 

Regions: 

start stop report i nterference 

710.41 1131.05 CO2 

724.42 737.21 

744.65 773.44 

788.47 832.25 

911.07 957.94 

964.00 991.97 

823.45 2935.13 SF6 

913.95 961o81 

857.01 2500.00 H20 

857.01 971.54 

1997.73 2143.12 

2569.69 2999.80 HCl 

2675.39 2678.59 

2700.43 2703.63 

2725.34 2728.65 

2748.91 2754.66 

2770.87 2778.19 

H20 

CO2,H20 

H20 

Page 1 
2796.13 2799.85 

3433,73 4267.35 

4037°96 4039°79 

4074.43 4076o10 

4108o95 4110.89 

4140.96 4175.21 

HF 

acme3 

H20 

Linearity: 

name CO2 

order 4 

force-zero true 

minimize-percent-error true 

dynamic-reference true 

use-dyanamic false 

use-linearity false 

use-shift false 

coefficents 0.58864,2.16232e-OO6,-5oO3205e-O13,-8.90641e-019 

setname co2 

References: 

set-filename C:\IMACC software\Linearity sets\co2\co2_lOM_high H20.set 

Z:\Methods\co2-1.spa Z:\Methods\co2-20.spa Z:\Methods\co2-150.spa Z:\Methods\Co2-2OO.spa Z:\Methods\co2_lk.spa Z:\Methods\co2-5kaspa Z:\Methods\CO2-1Ok.spa 

c02 Z:\Methods\co2-2Ok.spa 

CO2 Z:\Methods\co2-1OOk.spa Z:\Methods\co2_10%ospa 

code shortname pres(Torr) temp(C) conc(ppm) pathlength(m) 

c02 

C02 

co2-1 760 185 1 10 

c02-20 760 185 20 10 

c02-150 760 185 150 10 

co2-200 760 185 200 10 

co2_1k 760 185 1000 10 

co2-5k 760 185 5000 10 

c02-10k 760 185 10000 10 

c02-20k 760 185 20000 10 

co2-100k 650 185 le+005 4.2 

C02_10% 650 185 le+005 7.2 

Linearity: 

name H20 

order 3 

force-zero true 

minimize-percent-error true 

dynamic-reference true 

use-dyanamic false 

use-linearity false 

use-shift false 

coefficents 0.874796,3o15436e-O05,-3.55824e-011 

setname H20 

References: 

set-filename C:\IMACC software\Linearity H20, Z:\Methods\H201%-78m.spa H20, Z:\Methods\13.90%H20.spa H20, Z:\Methods\H202%-78m.spa 

H20, Z:\Methods\H203%-78m.spa 

Page 2 

Sets\H20-78m\H20-10m.set 
code 

H20 

H20 

H20 

H20 

acme3 

shortname pres(Torr) temp(C) conc(ppm) pathlength(m) 

H201%-78m 755 185 10000 78 

13.90%H20 758 185 1.39e+005 10.3 

H202%-78m 755 185 20000 78 

H203%-78m 755 185 30000 78 

10o 3 

24.7 

Linearity: 

name Hcl 

order 4 

force-zero true 

minimize-percent-error true 

dynamic-reference true 

use-dyanamic false 

use-linearity false 

use-shift false 

coefficents 1.33261,0.O00881044,'1.87083e-006,-5o0028e-010 

setname HCl 

References: 

set-filename C:\IMACC Software\Linearity Sets\HCl\HCl-High H20°set 

Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCl\HCL 0.12 ppm 10.3m 650_185C SynthetiCoSPA Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCI\HCL 0.49 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\Linearity SetS\HCI\HCL 1.24 ppm 10o3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\L1nearlty SetS\HCI\HCl 3.1ppm 10°3m 760_185C Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\Llnear•ty Sets\HCl\HCL 4.95 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•near•ty SetS\HCI\HCl 13o2 ppm 10.3 m 689_185C.SPA 

Hcl Z:\L•near•ty Sets\HCI\HCl 15.5ppm 10.3m 760_185C Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•nearlty SetS\HCI\HCl 24°7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA HCl Z:\L•nearlty Sets\HCI\HCl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185 SBS.SPA 

Z:\L•near•ty SetS\HCl\HCl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185 SBS2°SPA 

HCl Z:\L•nearlty Sets\HCI\HCl 31ppm 10.3m 760_185C Synthetic.SPA Z:\L•near•ty Sets\HCI\HCl 40 ppm 10.3 m 769_185C.SPA 

Hcl Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl 49.5 ppm 10.3m 650t_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\Linearity SetS\HCI\HCl 78ppm 10.3m 760_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\L1nearity SetS\HCI\HCl 123.7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl_50ppm.spa Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl 247.5 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl_100ppm.spa Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl 371 ppm 10.3m 650t_185C Synthetic.SPA Z:\Linearity Sets\HCI\HCl 495 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic.sPA Z:\Methods\HCl 91.3 ppm SF6 60 ppm 172C_68.5_850t SBS.SPA 

Z:\Methods\HCl_500ppm.spa 

code shortname pres(Torr) temp(C) conc(ppm) pathlength(m) 

10.3 

10.3 

10° 3 

10.3 

10° 3 

10.3 

HCL 0.12 ppm 10°3m 650_185C Synthetic 650 185 0.12 

HCL 0.49 ppm 10°3m 650_185C Synthetic 650 185 0.49 

HCL 1°24 ppm 10°3m 650_185C synthetic 650 185 1.24 

Hcl 3,1ppm 10.3m 760±185C synthetic 760 185 3.1 

Hcl HCL 4.95 ppm 10.3m 650_185C synthetic 650 185 4.95 

HCl HCl 13.2 ppm 10.3 m 689_185C 689 185 13.2 

HCl Hcl 15.5ppm 10.3m 760_185C Synthetic 760 185 15.5 

Hcl HCl 24.7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C Synthetic 650 185 

10.3 

Hcl Hcl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185 SBS 773 185 25 

Page 3 
iO• 3 

iOo 3 

10.3 

49.5 

123.7 

247°5 

371 

91.3 

10.3 

10.3 

10.3 

acme3 

HCl 25 ppm 760_10.3_185 SBS2 773 185 25 

760 185 31 

185 40 

650 185 

760 185 78 

650 185 

50 25.5 

650 185 

100 25.5 

650 185 

650 185 495 

852 172 

25,5 

Hcl HCl 31ppm 10.3m 760_185C Synthetic 

HCl 40 ppm 10o3 m 769_185C 769 

HCl Hcl 49•5 ppm 10o3m 650t_185C Synthetic 

10o3 

Hcl 78ppm 10o3m 760_185C synthetic 

Hcl 123o7 ppm 10.3m 650_185C synthetic 

10o3 

HCl_5Oppm 650 185 

Hcl 247.5 ppm 10.3m 650_185C synthetic 

10.3 

HCl_lOOppm 650 185 

Hcl 371 ppm 10•3m 650t_185C synthetic 

10.3 

HCl 495 ppm 10o3m 650_185C Synthetic 

HCl 91.3 ppm SF6 60 ppm 172C_68•5_850t SBS 

68.5 

HCl_5OOppm 650 185 500 

Linearity: 

name HF 

order 3 

force-zero true 

minimize-percent-error true 

dynamic-reference true 

use-dyanamic false 

use-linearity false 

use-shift false 

coefficents 0.689127,O.O0254714,1.56567e-006 

setname HF 

References: 

set-filename C:\IMACC Software\Linearity SetS\HF\HF•set 

HF, Z:\Methods\hf-lO.spa z:\Methods\hf-25.spa 

HF, Z:\Methods\HF 301 ppm 650_1_185C.SPA 

HF, Z:\Methods\HF 500.0 ppm 760_1_185C.SPA 

HF, z:\Methods\hf-150.spa Z:\Methods\hf-2OO.spa Z:\Methods\hf-25Ouspa 

code shortname pres(Torr) temp(C) conc(ppm) pathlength(m) 

HF hf-lO 760 185 10 

hf-25 760 185 25 

HF HF 301 ppm 650_1_185C 650 185 

HF HF 500.0 ppm 760_1_185C 760 185 

HF hf-150 760 185 150 

hf-200 760 185 200 

hf-250 760 185 250 

301 

5OO 

i0 

i0 

I0 

i0 

i0 

1 

1 

Bi as 

Page 4