alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002          The following statement is provided by the  undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q/A for The Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

        The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an  officer of Ruvane Fund Management Corporation, the  general partner of The Willowbridge Fund   L.P., that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in  the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of The Willowbridge  Fund L.P. for the period in question.

| Date:  September 13, 2006
 
By: 
/s/  Robert L. Lerner
 
  
President
 
  
Ruvane Fund Management Corporation        the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund        L.P. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 238.91 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued under the provisions of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act (Interlocks Act) (12 U.S.C. 3201 *et seq.*), as amended.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Interlocks Act and this subpart is to foster competition by generally prohibiting a management official from serving two nonaffiliated depository organizations in situations where the management interlock likely would have an anticompetitive effect.
( c ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to management officials of savings and loan holding companies, and their affiliates.
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

OCS	Air	Permit	Application	for	Drilling,	Exploration,	and	Maintenance	Activities	in	the	EGOM		

EPA’s Incompleteness Determination Letter Dated February 27, 2013

Trinity	Consultants	 	 	

Page	1	of	2	

Additional Information Regarding Comment 8

Well Completion Scenario – Pb Emissions		

Air Emission Sources

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Gas	Well	Completion Oil	Well	Completion	 Stimulation	Vessel	 Third	Party	Equipment

lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	

Tubing	Running	Pumps	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 4.48E‐04	 6.39E‐06	

Fluid	Filtration	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 4.89E‐04	 1.03E‐05	

E‐Line	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 1.10E‐03	 1.64E‐05	

CT	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 2.92E‐03	 4.38E‐05	

CT	Pump	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 4.19E‐03	 6.28E‐05	

Tug	 ‐	 ‐	 0.09	 9.00E‐04	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Barge	 ‐	 ‐	 2.63E‐03	 2.76E‐05	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Flowback	Boiler		 1.68E‐03	 5.05E‐06	 1.68E‐03	 5.05E‐06	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Boom	Flare	 0	 0	 0	 0	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Slickline	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 6.14E‐04	 1.84E‐05	

Stimulation	Vessel	

Engines	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 0.07	 1.28E‐03	 ‐	 ‐	

Drillship	Main	Engines	 3.28E‐02	 3.42E‐03	 3.28E‐02	 3.42E‐03	 3.28E‐02	 3.42E‐03	 3.28E‐02	 3.42E‐03	

Supply	Boats	 3.70E‐02	 3.85E‐03	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 3.70E‐02	 3.85E‐03	

Painting	(paint	+	

thinner)	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Total Emissions		 0.07 7.27E‐03 0.12 4.35E‐03 0.10 4.70E‐03 0.08 7.43E‐03
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

OCS	Air	Permit	Application	for	Drilling,	Exploration,	and	Maintenance	Activities	in	the	EGOM		

EPA’s Incompleteness Determination Letter Dated February 27, 2013

Trinity	Consultants	 	 	

Page	2	of	2	

Well Completion Scenario – GHG Emissions		

Air Emission Sources

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Gas	Well	Completion Oil	Well	Completion	 Stimulation	Vessel	 Third	Party	Equipment

lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	 lb/day	 tpy	

Tubing	Running	Pumps	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 2,529	 36	

Fluid	Filtration	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 2,760	 58	

E‐Line	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 6,184	 93	

CT	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 16,491	 247	

CT	Pump	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 23,637	 355	

Tug	 ‐	 ‐	 483,740	 5,079	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Barge	 ‐	 ‐	 14,842	 156	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Flowback	Boiler		 30,571	 92	 30,571	 92	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Boom	Flare	 7,017,407	 21,052	 4,678,272 14,035	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Slickline	Power	Pack	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 3,465	 104	

Stimulation	Vessel	

Engines	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 398,655	 7,216	 ‐	 ‐	

Drillship	Main	Engines	 184,987	 19,274	 184,988	 19,274	 184,988	 19,274	 184,988	 19,274	

Supply	Boats	 193,183	 20,091	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 193,183	 20,091	

Painting	(paint	+	

thinner)	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	 ‐	

Total Emissions		 7,426,149 60,509 5,392,413 38,635 583,642 26,490 433,236 40,257
# C_2014081EN.01000801.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/8

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2014

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement No 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

2014/C 81/07

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2014- | 6,50 | 0,23 | 1,99 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2014-

6,50

0,23

1,99

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6552

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

WILLIAM T. HOLLOMON, JR., 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:06-cr-00269-HEH-1; 3:08-cv-00146-HEH) 

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William T. Hollomon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

William T. Hollomon, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hollomon has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hollomon’s 

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASA International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Terrence C. McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 13, 2004                               /s/ Terrence C. McCarthy
                                              ------------------------
                                              Terrence C. McCarthy
                                              Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009145EN.01001601.xml

| 25.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/16

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has found that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2009/C 145/10

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 17 December 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 63616 |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Participation of the Icelandic State in the capital increase in E-Farice ehf. related to the Danice project |
| Type of measure | : | Share capital increase |
| Budget | : | ISK 183,5 million (approximately EUR 1,06 million) |
| Economic sectors | : | Telecommunications |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| Arnarhváli |
| 150 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

17 December 2008

Case number

:

63616

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Participation of the Icelandic State in the capital increase in E-Farice ehf. related to the Danice project

Type of measure

:

Share capital increase

Budget

:

ISK 183,5 million (approximately EUR 1,06 million)

Economic sectors

:

Telecommunications

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

Arnarhváli

150 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333- 81741 of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the entity’s change in method of accounting for intangible assets) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 of Perry Ellis International, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2003. 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Miami, Florida 

May 16, 2003
#### § 269b.310 Appeal rights.

Where the investigator has found that a prima facie case does not exist, a party, including an intervenor but excluding the respondent or other parties having the same interest as the respondent, within 5 days after receiving the Center's determination may petition the panel to set aside the determination and to cause formal proceedings, set forth in § 269b.410, to be invoked. The panel may grant such petition only on grounds that the Center or its agents were arbitrary, capricious, or acted contrary to law or the policy, or that the investigator's determination is clearly erroneous. The filing requirements for such a petition shall be the same as that for the filing of a charge, as set forth in § 269b.111.
427 A.2d 244

#### Commonwealth v. Ortiz, Appellant.

*621Submitted March 21, 1980.

Mark S. Refowich, for appellant;

John Gallagher, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
# C_2014066EN.01001301.xml

| 6.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/13

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2014/C 66/10

EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 11 December 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74723 |
| Decision number | : | 495/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title | : | The prolongation of the Icelandic regional aid map 2007-2013 until 30 June 2014 |
| Legal basis | : | The Authority’s Guidelines on National Regional Aid 2007-2013 |
| Type of measure | : | Regional aid map |
| Objective | : | Regional aid |
| Duration | : | 1.1.2014-30.6.2014 |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

11 December 2013

Case number

:

74723

Decision number

:

495/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title

:

The prolongation of the Icelandic regional aid map 2007-2013 until 30 June 2014

Legal basis

:

The Authority’s Guidelines on National Regional Aid 2007-2013

Type of measure

:

Regional aid map

Objective

:

Regional aid

Duration

:

1.1.2014-30.6.2014

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 263.457 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Service.* Service of a subpoena may be made: ( 1 ) By personal service;
( 2 ) If the person to be served is an individual, by delivery to a person of suitable age and discretion at the physical location where the individual resides or works;
( 3 ) By delivery to an agent which, in the case of a corporation or other association, is delivery to an officer, director, managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service and, if the agent is one authorized by statute to receive service and the statute so requires, by also mailing a copy to the party;
( 4 ) By registered or certified mail or by an express delivery service addressed to the person's or authorized agent's last known address; or
( 5 ) In such other manner as is reasonably calculated to give actual notice.
( b ) *Area of service.* Service in any state, territory, possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, on any person or company doing business in any state, territory, possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, or on any person as otherwise provided by law, is effective without regard to the place where the hearing or testimony is held, provided that if service is made on a foreign bank in connection with an action or proceeding involving one or more of its branches or agencies located in any state, territory, possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, service must be made on at least one branch or agency so involved. Foreign nationals are subject to such subpoenas if such service is made upon a duly authorized agent located in the United States or such other means permissible by law.
( c ) *Witness fees and mileage.* Witnesses summoned in any proceeding under this subpart must be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the district courts of the United States. Such fees and mileage need not be tendered when the subpoena is issued on behalf of the Board by any of its designated representatives.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DUANE LEE FREY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 28 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 09-42; MB Docket No. 08-43; RM-11420] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

At the request of White Park Broadcasting, Inc., this document allots Channel 300C3 at Basin, Wyoming, as the community's second local aural transmission service. Channel 300C3 can be allotted at Basin, Wyoming without a site restriction at coordinates 44-22-48 NL, and 108-02-18 WL. 

# DATES:

Effective March 2, 2009. 

# ADDRESSES:

Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Victoria McCauley, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MB Docket No. 08-43, adopted January 14, 2009, and released January 16, 2009. This matter was initiated by a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 73 FR 20005 (April 14, 2008). The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC                           ( print page 6122)                        20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *http://www.BCPIWEB.com.*

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio
      - Radio broadcasting

As stated in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows: 

# PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wyoming is amended by adding Basin, Channel 300C3. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. E9-2378 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 19.246 Petition for reinstatement. ( a ) *Form of petition.* Unless otherwise ordered by the Comptroller, a petition for reinstatement by an independent public accountant, an accounting firm, or an office of a firm that was removed, suspended, or debarred under § 19.243 may be made in writing at any time. The request must contain a concise statement of the action requested. The Comptroller may require the applicant to submit additional information.
( b ) *Procedure.* A petitioner for reinstatement under this section may, in the sole discretion of the Comptroller, be afforded a hearing. The accountant or firm bears the burden of going forward with a petition and proving the grounds asserted in support of the petition. In reinstatement proceedings, the person seeking reinstatement bears the burden of going forward with an application and proving the grounds asserted in support of the application. The Comptroller may, in his sole discretion, direct that any reinstatement proceeding be limited to written submissions. The removal, suspension, or debarment will continue until the Comptroller, for good cause shown, has reinstated the petitioner or until the suspension period has expired. The filing of a petition for reinstatement will not stay the effectiveness of the removal, suspension, or debarment of an accountant or firm.
CERTIFICATION


I, William L. Westerman, the Chief Executive Officer of Riviera Holdings
Corporation, certifies that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Riviera Holdings Corporation;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

              (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
         such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
         likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
         financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

         Date:    March 12, 2004

         William L. Westerman
         William L. Westerman
         Chief Executive Officer