alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors

     Non-employee directors, other than the Chairman of our Audit Committee, are
each paid an annual fee of $50,000. Our non-employee director who is Chairman of
our Audit Committee is paid an annual fee of $75,000. Each non-employee director
is also  reimbursed  for expenses  incurred in  connection  with  attendance  at
meetings of the Board of Directors.

     Our 2005 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Director Plan")
provides that on each  anniversary  of the effective  date of the Director Plan,
each individual elected, reelected or continuing as a non-employee director will
receive a nonqualified stock option for 6,000 shares of our Common Stock with an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of
grant.  These  options vest at the rate of 20% per year  commencing on the first
anniversary of the grant.

     Under our Nonqualified  Stock Option Plan for  Non-Employee  Directors (the
"1996 Plan"),  which expired in 2003,  each  individual  elected,  re-elected or
continuing as a non-employee  director would  automatically  receive options for
6,000 shares of our Common Stock (as adjusted for the 2005 stock split), with an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of
grant. In 2004 before we determined that the 1996 Plan had expired, we attempted
to grant options to our  non-employee  directors for a total of 30,000 shares of
our Common Stock.  In substitution  for those options,  in 2005 we issued 30,000
shares of Common Stock to our non-employee directors.  Messrs Silver, Harvey and
DiVito each received 6,000 shares and Mr. Land received 12,000 shares.

     Directors who are also our officers or employees do not receive  additional
compensation  for  services  as a  director.  Directors  who are  members of our
Compensation  Committee  have the right to receive  all or part of their  annual
fees in the form of our Common  Stock  having a fair  market  value equal to the
amount of their fees.
§ 40.9 Comment receipt and response to comments. ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 40.10 if: ( 1 ) A State office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a State process and all Federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a State process recommendation for a program selected under § 40.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from State, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no State process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a State process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from State, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a State has not established a process, or is unable to submit a State process recommendation, State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to VA.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a State process, State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to VA. In addition, if a State process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to VA by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 40.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a State process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 40.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the VA by a commenting party.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
# C_2008175EN.01000801.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/8

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 d of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 175/10)

| Aid No | Training aid — 1/08 — Norway |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Nordland/Salten |
| Title of aid scheme | Nordland Fylkeskommmune (Nordland County) |
| Legal basis | State budget for 2008 (St. prp. nr. 1 (2007-2008), Chapter 5.5.1, Section 61) |
| Overall expenditure planned under the scheme | EUR 3 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1 January 2008 |
| Duration of scheme | Until 1 January 2014 |
| Objective of aid | General and specific training |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for training aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Nordland Fylkeskommmune (Nordland County) |
| N-8048 Bodø |

Aid No

Training aid — 1/08 — Norway

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Nordland/Salten

Title of aid scheme

Nordland Fylkeskommmune (Nordland County)

Legal basis

State budget for 2008 (St. prp. nr. 1 (2007-2008), Chapter 5.5.1, Section 61)

Overall expenditure planned under the scheme

EUR 3 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1 January 2008

Duration of scheme

Until 1 January 2014

Objective of aid

General and specific training

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for training aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Nordland Fylkeskommmune (Nordland County)

N-8048 Bodø

da-bodo@nfk.no

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 5 of the Regulation

---
§ 210.46 Payment by a Federal Reserve Bank to a receiving bank or beneficiary. ( a ) *Payment to a receiving bank.* Payment of a Federal Reserve Bank's obligation to pay a receiving bank (other than a Federal Reserve Bank) occurs at the earlier of the time when the amount of the payment order is credited to the receiving bank's settlement account or when the payment order is sent to the receiving bank.
( b ) *Payment to a beneficiary.* Payment by a Federal Reserve Bank to a beneficiary of a payment order, where the Federal Reserve Bank is the beneficiary's bank, occurs at the earlier of the time when the amount of the payment order is credited to the beneficiary's settlement account or when notice of the credit is sent to the beneficiary.
#### §§ 1024.18-1024.19 [Reserved]
# C_2023116EN.01002801.xml

| 31.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/28

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 116/09)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Finland

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Finland

Subject of commemoration: Finland’s First Nature Conservation Act

Description of the design: The theme of the coin is a stylized beetle. On the top in semi-circle is the lettering ‘NATURE CONSERVATION’ in Finnish and at the bottom in semi-circle are the lettering ‘NATURE CONSERVATION’ in Swedish and the year of issuance ‘2023’. The right-hand side of the inner part of the coin bears the lettering ‘FI’. The left-hand side of the inner part of the coin bears the mintmark of the Mint of Finland.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 400 000

Date of issue: Spring 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
Exhibit 4.118


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. :ABC(2012)1003-1


13010120140003173


 


Borrower : Shijie
Kaiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd.


Lender : Agricultural
Bank of China, Shijiazhuang North City Branch


 


Signing Date : December 26, 2014


Loan Amount
: RMB100,000,000 


Length of maturity
: December 26, 2014 to December 25, 2015


Use of Loan
: Vehicle Purchase


 


Loan Interest : 6.72%


Date of Draft : January 4, 2015


Withdrawal Amount : RMB100,000,000


 


Payment Method : The principal and interest shall be fully repaid
at the maturity date of the loan.


Repayment Date
: January 3, 2016


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Mortgage .


 


- Hebei Ruiliang Trading Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum Pledge
Contract with the lender, with the contract no13010120140003173.
HomeRecent Actions for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Science and Technology Recent Actions

# 									Science and Technology Recent Actions							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

World Meteorological Organization – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Andorra and Nauru, December 23, 2019

Tags

MultilateralScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
§ 211.41 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) under the authority of the International Lending Supervision Act of 1983 (Pub. L. 98-181, title IX, 97 Stat. 1153) (International Lending Supervision Act); the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 221 *et seq.*) (FRA), and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*) (BHC Act).
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart is issued in furtherance of the purposes of the International Lending Supervision Act. It applies to State banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System (State member banks); corporations organized under section 25A of the FRA (12 U.S.C. 611 through 631) (Edge Corporations); corporations operating subject to an agreement with the Board under section 25 of the FRA (12 U.S.C. 601 through 604a) (Agreement Corporations); and bank holding companies (as defined in section 2 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)) but not including a bank holding company that is a foreign banking organization as defined in § 211.21(o).
[Reg. K, 68 FR 1159, Jan. 9, 2003]
42422.

#### WHITEHEAD et al. v. HENSON et al.

*82Argued November 8, 1966

Decided January 6, 1967

Rehearing denied January 24, 1967 —

*A. Tate Conyers,*for appellants.

*Harold Cheats, J. C. Murphy, Charles M. Lokey,*for appellees.

*83Felton, Chief Judge.

It is the duty of the board of tax assessors to receive and inspect the tax returns and to assess and fix the “just and fair valuation” to be placed on property when, in their opinion, the taxpayer has failed to do so. *Code Ann.*§ 92-6911 (Ga. L. 1937, pp. 517, 519). The taxing authorities are not prevented from increasing the valuation by the fact that the property has been returned for a lower valuation in the past and that there have been no improvements thereon, or that no particular fixed system was used to derive the valuation, as long as there is a just and fair valuation and the valuation as between individual taxpayers is justly and fairly equalized. *Hutchins v. Williams,*212 Ga. 754 (95 SE2d 674); *Code Ann.*§ 92-6911. The board of arbitrators provided for in *Code Ann.*§ 92-6912 (Ga. L. 1913, pp. 123, 127, as amended) are not vested with authority to determine questions of taxability, but' are limited to a review and determination (or assessment, in the words of the statute) of *values*respecting the property assessed for taxation. *Montgomery v. Suttles,*191 Ga. 781 (2) (13 SE2d 781). The “value” to be thus established is that at which all property is required by *Code*§ 92-5701 (Ga. L. 1909, p. 72) to be returned for taxation, i. e., market value, as defined by *Code*§ 92-5702 (Ga. L. 1909, p. 75). As pointed out in *Montgomery v. Suttles,*supra (2 b), assumption of jurisdiction by the board of arbitrators over anything more than the assessment of mere (fair market) value would involve power to pass on intricate questions of law (not intended by the statutory law relating to assessment of property, and arbitration of such assessments).

Consequently, the portion of the arbitrators’ award which exceeded their statutory function was void and not binding on the taxing authorities. The board was authorized in using the arbitrators’ finding of the valuation of the property, applying thereto the customary tax rates, and in rejecting the arbitrators’ unauthorized assessment of the amount of taxes due. Inasmuch as the petition fails to show that the board and the other defendants exceeded their statutory authority and discretion, it fails to state a cause of action for any of the relief *84sought; therefore, the court did not err in its judgment sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> RENMINRI YUAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   8.30
<CASH>                                          85,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               442,792
<PP&E>                                          11,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        270
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,249
<SALES>                                        474,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,102
<CGS>                                          449,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of B.L.R., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-16-00219-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-04570J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

On March 15, 2016, appellant, A.M.B., filed a notice of appeal in the trial court 

from the order granting the motion to dismiss her petition to modify the parent-child 

relationship and, in the alternative, motion to deny appellant’s motion for temporary 

orders, signed on February 15, 2016. On March 16, 2016, the trial clerk’s letter of 

assignment to this Court designated this case as an accelerated appeal apparently because 

it previously involved the termination of parental rights.

On March 24, 2016, appellant filed an amended notice of appeal seeking to appeal 

from both the order granting adoption to petitioners P.R.H. and H.R.H., signed on 

December 17, 2015, and the order granting the motion to dismiss her modification 

petition, signed on February 15, 2016. Appellant, who was the foster mother, and is the 

adoptive mother of the biological sibling of the child, B.L.R., the subject of this suit, 

contended that this should not be an accelerated appeal because the issue of termination 

was not being appealed, merely the subsequent order denying her petition to modify the 

prior termination decree. One of the appellees, the Texas Department of Family and 

Protective Services (“DFPS”), filed a memo contending that this case should remain as an 

accelerated appeal, while appellant filed a response in opposition.

The reporter’s record was filed in this Court on May 22, 2016. The sealed original 

clerk’s record was filed on May 13, 2016, and the first and second supplemental clerk’s 

records were filed on June 23 and July 6 and 13, 2016, respectively. Thus, the appellate 

records appear to be complete.
2

After a preliminary review of the records, however, it appears that this is not an 

accelerated appeal. Neither of the orders on appeal arose from a suit in which the 

termination of parental rights was at issue or from a child protection case filed by a 

governmental entity, such as DFPS, for managing conservatorship. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

28.4(a)(2). In addition, neither of the orders on appeal contained the specific language 

that is required in all child protection cases to be listed in all capital letters warning that 

any appeal in a suit involving the termination of parental rights will be governed by the 

rules for accelerated appeals. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(b) (West Supp. 

2015).

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to designate this case as a standard 

appeal in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Thus, the appellant’s brief is 

ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 

38.6(a)(1), (d). The appellees’ briefs, if any, are ORDERED to be filed within 30 days

of the date of the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Higley

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 14, 2016
# C_2023109EN.01007201.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/72

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 March 2023

(2023/C 109/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0879 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4482 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88523 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9969 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2840 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,658 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 384,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6868 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9228 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,7179 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6242 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4875 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5396 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7373 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4434 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 396,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,7787 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4312 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 450,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8063 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,125 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,119 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6995 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1915 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,4810 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0879

JPY

Japanese yen

142,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4482

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88523

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2220

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9969

ISK

Iceland króna

149,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2840

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,658

HUF

Hungarian forint

384,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6868

RON

Romanian leu

4,9228

TRY

Turkish lira

20,7179

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6242

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4875

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5396

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7373

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4434

KRW

South Korean won

1 396,18

ZAR

South African rand

19,7787

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4312

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 450,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8063

PHP

Philippine peso

59,125

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,119

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6995

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1915

INR

Indian rupee

89,4810

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000900017
<NAME> THOMAS GROUP,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,422
<PP&E>                                           7,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               62
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,890
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (252)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,217
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>