alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal
Management, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice
President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



  /s/ Daniel W. Dienst
--------------------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
February 2, 2006

  /s/ Robert C. Larry
--------------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
February 2, 2006

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Riviera Holdings Corporation,
a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), held at the Riviera Hotel, 2901 Las Vegas
Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 on Thursday, May 8, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
(local time), the Stockholders of the Company to: (i) increase the number of
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common
Stock"), available for purchase there under from 480,000 shares to 1,000,000
shares; and (ii) set an upper limit on the number of options that may be granted
to any individual under the Stock Option Plan in any calendar year. The
Stockholders of the Company approved the amendment to make an additional 520,000
shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Stock Option Plan in
order to allow the Stock Option Plan to remain in effect and to address the need
for available shares for a number of years. Also, the Stockholders of the
Company approved the amendment to set the aggregate number of shares of Common
Stock covered by options that may be granted to any individual under the Stock
Option Plan within any one calendar year at 350,000 shares in order to conform
the Stock Option Plan to United States treasury regulations to ensure that
taxable compensation received by employees upon exercise of options will be
fully deductible by the Company.
§ 238.88 Factors for review. ( a ) *Board review.* ( 1 ) In determining whether to approve an exemption application filed under § 238.87, the Board will consider the extent to which the position that is the subject of the application enables a person to: ( i ) Participate in the major policymaking functions of the savings and loan holding company; or
( ii ) Threaten the safety and soundness of any insured depository institution that is controlled by the savings and loan holding company, the interests of its depositors, or the public confidence in the insured depository institution.
( 2 ) The Board will also consider whether the applicant has demonstrated the person's fitness to hold the described position. Some positions may be approved without an extensive review of a person's fitness because the position does not enable a person to take the actions described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Factors.* In making the determinations under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board will consider the following factors: ( 1 ) The position;
( 2 ) The amount of influence and control a person holding the position will be able to exercise over the affairs and operations of the savings and loan holding company and the insured depository institution;
( 3 ) The ability of the management of the savings and loan holding company to supervise and control the activities of a person holding the position;
( 4 ) The level of ownership that the person will have at the savings and loan holding company;
( 5 ) The specific nature and circumstances of the criminal offense. The question whether a person who was convicted of a crime or who agreed to enter into a pretrial diversion or similar program for a crime was guilty of that crime is not relevant;
( 6 ) Evidence of rehabilitation; and
( 7 ) Any other relevant factor.
EXHIBIT 23  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75811) pertaining to the
1997 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. and restated 1988 Amended and
Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated February 2,
2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statement of Thomas Group, Inc.
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.   //s// Hein &
  Associates LLPHein & Associates
  LLP  Dallas, Texas March 29, 2006
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

August 14, 1998

Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc.
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77094

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 as indicated in
our report dated August 5, 1998; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30917 for Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-52795
for Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
# C_2012284EN.01001201.xml

| 20.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/12

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 284/04

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 15 March 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 69853 |
| Decision number | : | 91/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | n.a. |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Aid for the development phase of the Mongstad CCS facility |
| Legal basis | : | Implementation Agreement between the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Statoil (12 October 2006) and the Development Agreement between the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Statoil (5 April 2011), the latter also signed by Gassnova as a third party as regards ‘those areas in which Gassnova acts on behalf of the State in pursuance of the Agreement’ |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Budget | : | NOK 2 850 million |
| Economic sectors | : | Energy production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Government Administration, Reform and Church Affairs |
| Akersgata 59 |
| P.O Box 8004 Dep. |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

15 March 2012

Case number

:

69853

Decision number

:

91/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

:

n.a.

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Aid for the development phase of the Mongstad CCS facility

Legal basis

:

Implementation Agreement between the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Statoil (12 October 2006) and the Development Agreement between the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Statoil (5 April 2011), the latter also signed by Gassnova as a third party as regards ‘those areas in which Gassnova acts on behalf of the State in pursuance of the Agreement’

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Budget

:

NOK 2 850 million

Economic sectors

:

Energy production

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Government Administration, Reform and Church Affairs

Akersgata 59

P.O Box 8004 Dep.

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# EUR-Lex - E2003C0306(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# E2003C0306(01)

**Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 and 63 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(1) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement — EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures **

*
Official Journal C 052 , 06/03/2003 P. 0016 - 0016 *

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 and 63 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(1) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

(2003/C 52/09)

Date of adoption: 25.9.2002

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 95-010

Title: To propose appropriate measures to Norway with regard to State aid in the form of regionally differentiated social security taxation (Geografisk differensiert arbeidsgiveravgift)

Objective: Regional development

Legal basis: Act relating to national insurance (Lov om folketrygd av 17.6.1966, No 12)

Budget: Unspecified

Aid intensity: Norway is divided into five geographical zones with differentiated social security taxation (Zone 1: 14,1 %, Zone 2: 10,6 %, Zone 3: 6,4 %, Zone 4: 5,1 %, Zone 5: 0,0 %)

Duration: Until 1.1.2004

Other information: The appropriate measures, as accepted by the Norwegian authorities by letter dated 25.10.2002, are as follows:

(a) The Norwegian authorities shall take any legislative, administrative and other measures necessary to eliminate any State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) EEA resulting from the system of regionally differentiated social security tax, or to render such aid compatible with Article 61 of the EEA Agreement,

(b) The Norwegian authorities shall eliminate any such aid or render it compatible with effect from 1.1.2004 unless the Authority agrees to a later date should that be considered objectively necessary and justified by the Authority in order to allow an appropriate transition for the undertakings in question to the adjusted situation; and

(c) The Norwegian authorities shall communicate to the Authority the relevant measures adjusting the aid scheme as soon as possible and in any event no later than 25 March 2003.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795196
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,777,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,043,346
<PP&E>                                      24,189,939
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,717,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,935,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          520,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,414,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,935,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,257,302
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  601,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               603,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,052,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,052,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,052,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.78
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.81

                                  EXTENSION TO
                               SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

        This Extension to Severance Agreement (the "Amendment") is made
effective as of February 27, 2002 by and between Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.,
("Corporation") and Barry Wiley ("Employee") and amends the Severance Agreement
between the Corporation and Employee dated as of September 21, 1999 (the
"Original Agreement"). Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have
the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

        1. Employee is employed by the Corporation.

        2. The Corporation and Employee entered into the Original Agreement with
respect to Employee's employment by the Corporation.

        3. The Company and Employee mutually desire to amend the Original
Agreement to extend the term until April 30, 2003.

                                    AGREEMENT

        In consideration of the mutual convents hereinafter contained, the
Corporation and Employee agree as follows:

        1. Section 1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated to
read in its entirety as follows:

           INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION. If Employee's employment is terminated as a
           result of Involuntary Termination other than for cause, at any time
           prior to April 30, 2003, Employee will be entitled to consideration
           as defined below.

        2. All other provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

        3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be enforceable against the parties, and all of which together shall
constitute one instrument.

        4. This Amendment shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the
State of California without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.



<PAGE>


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Severance Agreement is
hereby executed as of the date first above written.

COMPANY:

CATALYST SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

By:  /s/ Radu Vanco
----------------------------------
        Radu Vanco
        President & CEO

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED
THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002:

EMPLOYEE:

By: /s/ Barry Wiley
----------------------------------
Name:  Barry Wiley



                                       -2-
# C_2016396EN.01000601.xml

| 27.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2016/C 396/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 25 January 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 78337 |
| Decision No | : | 23/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Zero VAT rate for electronic news services |
| Legal basis | : | Act on Value Added Tax of 19 June 2009, No 58, section 6-2; and Regulation concerning Value Added Tax of 15 December 2009, No 1540, section 6-2-1 |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Media plurality and diversity |
| Form of aid | : | Zero VAT rate |
| Budget | : | Approx. NOK 350 million/year |
| Duration | : | Until 1 March 2022 |
| Economic sectors | : | News and current affairs media, including NACE J58.1.3 (Publishing of newspapers) and NACE J60 (Programming and broadcasting activities) |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| P.O. Box 8008 Dep. |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

25 January 2016

Case No

Case No

:

78337

Decision No

Decision No

:

23/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Zero VAT rate for electronic news services

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Act on Value Added Tax of 19 June 2009, No 58, section 6-2; and Regulation concerning Value Added Tax of 15 December 2009, No 1540, section 6-2-1

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Media plurality and diversity

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Zero VAT rate

Budget

Budget

:

Approx. NOK 350 million/year

Duration

Duration

:

Until 1 March 2022

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

News and current affairs media, including NACE J58.1.3 (Publishing of newspapers) and NACE J60 (Programming and broadcasting activities)

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

P.O. Box 8008 Dep.

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<PAGE>
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated April 3, 1998, accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Harry's 
Farmers Market, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 28, 1998. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration 
Statements of Harry's Farmers Market, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-74348, 
effective January 21, 1994, File No. 33-81118, effective July 1, 1994, File No. 
33-81120, effective July 1, 1994, File No. 33-91924, effective May 4, 1995 and 
File No. 333-10403, effective August 19, 1996).


                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP


        
Atlanta, Georgia
April 27, 1998
§ 239.50 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *General.* This subpart governs how a mutual holding company may convert from the mutual to the stock form of ownership. This subpart supersedes all inconsistent charter and bylaw provisions of mutual holding companies converting to stock form.
( b ) *Prescribed forms.* A mutual holding company must use the forms prescribed under this subpart and provide such information as the Board may require under the forms by regulation or otherwise. The forms required under this subpart include: Form AC (Application for Conversion); Form PS (Proxy Statement); Form OC (Offering Circular); and Form OF (Order Form).
( c ) *Waivers.* The Board may waive any requirement of this subpart or a provision in any prescribed form. To obtain a waiver, a mutual holding company must file a written request with the Board that: ( 1 ) Specifies the requirement(s) or provision(s) that the mutual holding company wants the Board to waive;
( 2 ) Demonstrates that the waiver is equitable; is not detrimental to the mutual holding company, mutual members, or other mutual holding companies or savings associations; and is not contrary to the public interest; and
( 3 ) Includes an opinion of counsel demonstrating that applicable law does not conflict with the waiver of the requirement or provision.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–637

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3916, A BILL TO AMEND

THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO REPEAL THE EXCISE TAX

ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICES

MAY 23, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 511]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 511, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of H.R.

3916, a bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the excise tax on telephone and other communication services,

under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The rule waives all

points of order against consideration of the bill.

The rule provides that the amendment recommended by the

Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be

considered as adopted upon adoption of the resolution. Finally, the

rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 4(a)

of rule XIII (requiring a three-day layover of the committee report)

because the report was not filed until Monday, May 22, and the bill

may be considered by the House as early as Wednesday, May 24.

Æ