alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.26 Document subpoenas to nonparties. ( a ) *General rules.* — ( 1 ) Any party may apply to the ALJ for the issuance of a document discovery subpoena addressed to any person who is not a party to the proceeding. The application must contain a proposed document subpoena and a brief statement showing the general relevance and reasonableness of the scope of documents sought. The subpoenaing party must specify a reasonable time, place, and manner for making production in response to the document subpoena.
( 2 ) A party may apply for a document subpoena under this section only within the time period during which such party could serve a discovery request under § 19.24(d). The party obtaining the document subpoena is responsible for serving it on the subpoenaed person and for serving copies on all parties. Document subpoenas may be served in any state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, or as otherwise provided by law.
( 3 ) The ALJ will promptly issue any document subpoena requested pursuant to this section. If the ALJ determines that the application does not set forth a valid basis for the issuance of the subpoena, or that any of its terms are unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, or unduly burdensome, the ALJ may refuse to issue the subpoena or may issue it in a modified form upon such conditions as may be consistent with the Uniform Rules.
( b ) *Motion to quash or modify.* — ( 1 ) Any person to whom a document subpoena is directed may file a motion to quash or modify such subpoena with the ALJ. The motion must be accompanied by a statement of the basis for quashing or modifying the subpoena. The movant must serve the motion on all parties, and any party may respond to such motion within ten days of service of the motion.
( 2 ) Any motion to quash or modify a document subpoena must be filed on the same basis, including the assertion of privilege, upon which a party could object to a discovery request under § 19.25(d), and during the same time limits during which such an objection could be filed.
( c ) *Enforcing document subpoenas.* If a subpoenaed person fails to comply with any subpoena issued pursuant to this section or any order of the ALJ, which directs compliance with all or any portion of a document subpoena, the subpoenaing party or any other aggrieved party may, to the extent authorized by applicable law, apply to an appropriate United States district court for an order requiring compliance with so much of the document subpoena as the ALJ has not quashed or modified. A party's right to seek court enforcement of a document subpoena will in no way limit the sanctions that may be imposed by the ALJ on a party who induces a failure to comply with subpoenas issued under this section.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: ·· 

To: 

Subject: 

Good Morning Brian, 

Paul Cullen <Paui.Cullen@ascensus.com> 

Monday, August 13, 2012 10:33 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

SkyWest - Yes 

I usually don't do emails like this, but I just wanted to put in my two cents. I have moved up to the Brainerd area from 

the Twin Cities. I use the Brainerd Airport often for traveling for work. At all opportunities I fly in and out of 

Brainerd. Also, we have many friends and family that fly up to Minnesota multiple times a year. They try to fly in and 

out of Brainerd if they can. I think it would be important to stick with an Air Carrier that would accommodate 

bathrooms, convenience, and flexibility to keep people flying in and out of Brainerd.(i.e. SkyWest) 

I know from a convenience standpoint, if a carrier from Brainerd to MSP required to go through security and switch from 

HH to MSP International, then all convenience and time efficiency is lost. If this would be the case many colleague 

travelers and myself would just choose to drive down to MSP and fly in and out of there. 

Please choose SkyWest to keep the Brainerd Airport alive and to accommodate business and vacation travelers in and 

out ofthe Brainerd Area! 

Thank You! 

Paul 

Paul J. Cullen, CISP 

Ascensus; ERISA Consultant 

Phone: (218) 825-5035 

Fax: (218) 825-5011 

Email: paul.cullen@ascensus.com 

Visit us on the web at www.ascensus.com 

People Matter. Quality First. Integrity Always. 5

M 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended to be viewed only by the listed recipient(s). It may 

contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 

dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited without our prior written permission. 

If you are not an intended recipient, or if you have received this communication in error, please notify us 

immediately by return e-mail and permanently remove the original message and any copies from your computer 

and all back-up systems. 

1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Missile Defense Agency (MDA), DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with section 2330a of title 10 United States Code as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (NDAA 08) section 807, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Office of the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Office of Strategic Sourcing (DPAP/SS) will make available to the public the first inventory of activities performed pursuant to contracts for services. The inventory will be published to the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Web site at the following location:                         *http://www.mda.mil/​barbb/​barbb.htm.*

# DATES:

Inventory to be made publically available within 30 days after publication of this notice.

# ADDRESSES:

Send written comments and suggestions concerning this inventory to Pamela Bible, Procurement Analyst, MDA/DACP 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20307-7100.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Pamela Bible at (703) 882-6062 or e-mail                         *Pamela.Bible@mda.mil.*

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-24508 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    10,726
<SECURITIES>                             500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            695,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                            1,537,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,412,412
<PP&E>                                15,710,372
<DEPRECIATION>                           942,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        18,700,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  4,172,237
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   5,333
<OTHER-SE>                             9,599,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          18,700,519
<SALES>                                1,473,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,502,792
<CGS>                                  1,648,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,648,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         377,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       322,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (844,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (844,656)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (844,656)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.163)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.163)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011222EN.01000601.xml

| 28.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2011/C 222/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 13 April 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 69146 |
| Decision number | : | 127/11/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Rescue aid scheme involving settlement of claims owned by the Central Bank of Iceland on savings banks |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | : | Settlement of claims |
| Duration | : | The scheme has been temporarily approved until 30 April 2011 |
| Economic sector | : | Financial sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 150 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

13 April 2011

Case number

:

69146

Decision number

:

127/11/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Rescue aid scheme involving settlement of claims owned by the Central Bank of Iceland on savings banks

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

:

Settlement of claims

Duration

:

The scheme has been temporarily approved until 30 April 2011

Economic sector

:

Financial sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

Arnarhvoli

150 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### Michael Pappas *v.*Liquor Control Commission.

Maltbie, C. J., Avery, Brown, Jennings and Ells, Js.

Argued January 9

decided February 7, 1941.

*William J. McKenna,*with whom, on the brief, was *John M. Chapnick,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harry L. Brooks,*assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was *Francis A. Pallotti,*attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff had a restaurant permit under the Liquor Control Act which authorized him to sell alcoholic liquor to be consumed on the premises. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 959e. After a hearing, the liquor control commission revoked the permit for “unsuitability of person by reason of violations of Sections of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes: 1. Section 959e, sales of alcoholic liquors for *722consumption off the premises; 2. Section 979e, sales of alcoholic liquor before hours on Sunday.” The plaintiff appealed, the case was heard upon the evidence and proceedings before the commission, and the appeal dismissed. The evidence before the commission was a sufficient basis upon which it could reasonably conclude that there had been a violation of both sections of the statutes specified in its order of revocation. It could reasonably find that the sales in both instances were of beer within the terms of the act. *State*v. *Boucher,*119 Conn. 436, 439, 177 Atl. 383. That permit was revocable for a violation of any of the provisions of the Liquor Control Act, of which the sections in question were a part. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1935, § 1056c. The violation of these sections was the real basis upon which the commission acted, and we have no occasion to determine whether a general unsuitability of a permittee to continue to hold a permit would in itself justify its revocation.

There is no error.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Member Conflict Review, Program Announcement 
Number (PA) 07-318, Initial Review

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3 p.m., November 9, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 
26506, Telephone: (304) 285-6143.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Member Conflict Review, PA 07-318.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Chris Langub, Scientific 
Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., Mailstop E74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Telephone: (404) 
498-2543.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-24398 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
§ 218.772 Exemption from the definition of “broker” for banks engaging in securities lending transactions. ( a ) A bank is exempt from the definition of the term “broker” under section 3(a)(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)), to the extent that, as an agent, it engages in or effects securities lending transactions, and any securities lending services in connection with such transactions, with or on behalf of a person the bank reasonably believes to be: ( 1 ) A qualified investor as defined in section 3(a)(54)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(54)(A)); or
( 2 ) Any employee benefit plan that owns and invests on a discretionary basis, not less than $ 25,000,000 in investments.
( b ) *Securities lending transaction* means a transaction in which the owner of a security lends the security temporarily to another party pursuant to a written securities lending agreement under which the lender retains the economic interests of an owner of such securities, and has the right to terminate the transaction and to recall the loaned securities on terms agreed by the parties.
( c ) *Securities lending services* means: ( 1 ) Selecting and negotiating with a borrower and executing, or directing the execution of the loan with the borrower;
( 2 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of loaned securities;
( 3 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of collateral;
( 4 ) Providing mark-to-market, corporate action, recordkeeping or other services incidental to the administration of the securities lending transaction;
( 5 ) Investing, or directing the investment of, cash collateral; or
( 6 ) Indemnifying the lender of securities with respect to various matters.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2779

To repeal section 5103 of title 31, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL

To repeal section 5103 of title 31, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honest Money Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LEGAL TENDER LAWS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5103 of title 31, United 

7 States Code, (relating to legal tender) is hereby repealed. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for subchapter I of chapter 51 of title 31, United States 
2

•HR 2779 IH 

1 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

2 5103 and inserting the following new item:

‘‘5103. [Reserved]’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Perry Ellis International, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                     |  |                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2004 |  | /S/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE
|                      |  | Name: Title:        |  | Timothy B. Page Chief Financial Officer (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2012012EN.01001801.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/18 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Publication of the Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications’ intention of awarding a public service contract directly in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 1191/69 and (EEC) No 1107/70( 1 )

2012/C 12/06

| 1. | Name and address of the competent authority:
The Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communication Departement for Rail Transport PO Box 8010 Dep 0030 Oslo NORWAY | The Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communication | Departement for Rail Transport | PO Box 8010 Dep | 0030 Oslo | NORWAY |
| ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------- | ------ |
| The Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communication | | | | | | |
| Departement for Rail Transport | | | | | | |
| PO Box 8010 Dep | | | | | | |
| 0030 Oslo | | | | | | |
| NORWAY | | | | | | |

| 2. | Type of award envisaged:
Direct award |
| -- | -------------------------------------- |

| 3. | Services and areas potentially covered by the award:
National passenger services by rail: all services covered by a public service contract in 2011, except the Gjøvik line and the Ofoten line. |
| -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

---

( 1 )  Published in the EEA Supplement No 2, 12.1.2012, page 5.

---
§ 217.502 Application of the Board's Regulatory Capital Framework to Employee Stock Ownership Plans that are Depository Institution Holding Companies and Certain Trusts that are Savings and Loan Holding Companies. ( a ) *Employee Stock Ownership Plans.* Notwithstanding § 217.1(c), a bank holding company or covered savings and loan holding company that is an employee stock ownership plan is exempt from this part until the Board adopts regulations that directly relate to the application of capital regulations to employee stock ownership plans.
( b ) *Personal or Family Trusts.* Notwithstanding § 217.1(c), a covered savings and loan holding company is exempt from this part if it is a personal or family trust and not a business trust until the Board adopts regulations that apply capital regulations to such a covered savings and loan holding company.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), StevenD. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.