alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.14

                      CANADIAN RAINFOREST RESTAURANTS, INC.
                                 Lease Abstract

1.     PROJECT           Scarborough Shopping Centre, Scarborough,
                         Ontario

2.     TENANT            Canadian Rainforest Restaurants, Inc.

3.     STORE AREA        Unspecified Gross Leaseable Area of not less
                         than 20,000 square feet

4.     TRADE NAME        Rainforest Cafe

5.     USE               For the operation of a traditional
                         "Rainforest Cafe" restaurant

6.     TERM              15 years

7.     TERM START
         DATE            January 1, 1999

8.     TERM EXPIRY
         DATE            December 31, 2013

9.     GROSS RENT        CDN $53.64 per sq ft of the exact Gross Leaseable
                         Area of the store

10.    EXTENSION         First Extension Term: 5 years
       PERIODS           Second Extension Term: 5 years

11.    PERCENTAGE        5.00% of Gross Revenue, less the aggregate of
       RENT              the Artificial Gross Rent and the amount of Realty
                         Taxes (other than any Initial Business Tax Component)
                         Payable by tenant under section 3.3, all as provided
                         under section 3.2. For the purpose of this key data
                         item 11 and section 3.2, the "Artificial Gross Rent
                         "means $33.00 per square foot per annum of the Gross
                         Leaseable Area of the Store.

12.    PREPAID RENT      Nil

13.    SECURITY          Nil
       DEPOSIT


ELEPHANT & CASTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.                    5 GTM/LEH/JAW 042199
ALAMO GRILL  FRANCHISE AGREEMENT                                     475250.5
<PAGE>

14.    INITIAL PRO-      Nil
       MOTION CHARGE

15.    FIXTURING         180 Days
         PERIOD

16.    LANDLORD          c/o 20 Vic Management Inc., 20 Victoria Street,
         ADDRESS         Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2N8

17.    GUARANTOR         None

18.    PROPERTY          20 Vic Management Inc.
       MANAGER

19.    LANDLORD TENANT
       ALLOWANCE         CDN $2,000,000


ELEPHANT & CASTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.                    5 GTM/LEH/JAW 042199
ALAMO GRILL  FRANCHISE AGREEMENT                                     475250.5
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1



May 2, 2001

Board of Directors
Metal Management, Inc.
500 North Dearborn, Suite 405
Chicago, IL 60610

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your
Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2000. Note 3 therein describes a change in
accounting principle for assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangible assets from using an undiscounted future cash flows method to using a
fair value method. It should be understood that the preferability of one
acceptable method of accounting over another for assessing the recoverability of
goodwill and other intangible assets has not been addressed in any authoritative
accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on
management's determination that this change in accounting principle is
preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our
discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business
planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such
change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
20.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to March 31, 2000. Accordingly, our comments are
subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements
covering the period of the change in accounting principle.


Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
§ 263.109 Further proceedings. ( a ) *General rule.* The determination of a recommended award shall be made by the administrative law judge on the basis of the written record of the adversary adjudication, including any supporting affidavits submitted in connection with the application, unless, on the motion of either the applicant or Board counsel, or sua sponte, the administrative law judge or the Board orders further proceedings to amplify the record such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions, or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application and shall be conducted promptly and expeditiously.
( b ) *Request for further proceedings.* A request for further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the issues in dispute and shall explain why additional proceedings are necessary.
( c ) *Hearing.* The administrative law judge shall hold an oral evidentiary hearing only on disputed issues of material fact which cannot be adequately resolved through written submissions.
42342.

#### SMALLWOOD v. THE STATE.

Submitted October 3, 1966

Decided October 11, 1966.

*Joseph H. Blackshear, Reed & Dunn, Robert J. Reed, Elliott Dunn, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor General, Frank C. Strickland, Jr.,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“ ‘Verbal absurdities will not render an indictment or other pleadings subject to demurrer, where the language, taken as a whole, nevertheless clearly, adequately, and definitely charges a crime.’ *Mixon v. State, 7*Ga. App. 805, 806 (68 SE 315).” *Middlebrooks v. State,*107 Ga. App. 587 (1) (130 SE2d 798). The defendant was charged with possessing nontax-paid liquor and under the decisions in *Jenkins v. State,*93 Ga. App. 360, 363 (92 SE2d 43) and *Martin v. State,*96 Ga. App. 557 (100 SE2d 645), the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s demurrers to the indictment.

During the trial of the case the State’s witness C. J. Lynch testified that he saw the defendant approach a “stash” of nontaxpaid whiskey and pour some from a large container into a smaller container, that he called the defendant by name although he did not know him personally. When asked why he called him by name the witness replied: “Well, I knew where I was going to *460make my investigation and I knew who I was supposed to find at the stash or who I was supposed . . .” At this point the defendant’s counsel objected on the ground that the testimony of this witness was a conclusion and highly prejudicial. The trial court sustained the obj ection and counsel for the defendant then moved for a mistrial. This motion was overruled and is the basis of the defendant’s second enumeration of error.

*Code*§ 38-302 provides: “When, in a legal investigation, information, conversations, letters and replies, and similar evidence are facts to explain conduct and ascertain motives, they shall be admitted in evidence, not as hearsay, but as original evidence.” Under this Code section and cases exemplified by *Phillips v. State,*206 Ga. 418 (57 SE2d 555), and cases there cited, the testimony of the State’s witness explaining his conduct in calling the defendant by name was admissible evidence which the trial court, on motion of the defendant, excluded. Accordingly, there was no error in thereafter overruling the defendant’s motion for a mistrial.

“Identity is a question for the trior of fact, and where a witness identifies a defendant (whether the identification be based on the defendant’s eyes, clothes, hairline, or some intangible factor not capable of description), the credibility of the witness making such identification is not to be decided by this court.” *Strickland v. Mayor &c. of Athens,*111 Ga. App. 280 (2) (141 SE2d 594). The State’s witness identified the defendant as the person possessing the liquor, while the defendant, as well as his witnesses, sought to prove that the defendant was not the person at the “stash” of liquor. Such evidence presented a question for the jury as to identity, and it cannot be said that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Quad Systems Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan and Quad
Systems Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-04755) and the Quad
Systems Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-93436) of our
report dated November 6, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Quad Systems Corporation included in Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended September 30, 1998.
    

                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
   
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795196
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,029,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,095,632
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,183,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          714,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,468,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,183,003
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,642,078
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,140,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,140,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,140,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                      20.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.62


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications. Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Structure and finances of U.S.farms**** 
SuDoc Number:A 1.75/2:
Item Number:0004 (online), 0004-B (online)
CGP SystemNumber:000602988
 
2005 | 2007 | 2010 | 2014
 
March4, 2020**
[Maxus Properties Letterhead]

Via Fax and UPS Overnight

March 29, 2000

Mr. Bradley J. Schafer
SCHAFERICHARDSON, Inc.
530 Ford Centre
420 North Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN  55401

RE:  Cobblestone Court Sale Agreement

Dear Brad:

The purpose of this letter is to set forth an amendment to the Cobblestone Court
Shopping Center Sale Agreement dated January 28, 2000 (the "Agreement"), between
Nooney Real  Property  Investors - Four,  L.P. (now known as Maxus Real Property
Investors - Four, L.P. "Seller") and Farrington Properties, Inc. ("Buyer").

Buyer and Seller agree as follows:

         1. The initial  closing date set forth in Paragraph 8 of the  Agreement
was March 28, 2000, and the  transaction  has not closed.  Buyer hs not made the
$100,000 additional Earnest Deposit to the Title Company required by Paragraph 8
to extend the closing date for an additional forty-five (45) day period.

         2. Seller  provided  to Buyer the  subordination,  non-disturbance  and
attornment  agreements  (the  "SNDA's")  and  estoppel  letters  from all of the
tenants of the Property in form  reasonably  required by Buyer's lender prior to
March 28, 2000 as required by Paragraph 19 of the Agreement.  Buyer acknowledges
that Seller has complied with all of the "Contingency" requirements set forth in
Paragraph 19 of the Agreement  and this  Paragraph is removed from the Agreement
with the exception of the final sentence which will remain.

         3. Buyer will deposit the $100,000  additional Earnest Deposit required
by  Paragraph  8 at the Title  Company no later  than March 31,  2000 which will
extend the closing date to no later than May 15, 2000.



                   1100 Main, Suite 2100 Kansas City, MO 64105
       806-421-4670 P.O. Box 26730 Kansas City, MO 64198 FAX 816-221-1829
<PAGE>

May 29, 2000
Bradley J. Schafer
Page 2

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and affect.

If the terms and  conditions of this  amendment are  acceptable,  acknowledge as
such by signing below and returning to me along with evidence of the  additional
$100,000 deposit no later than March 31, 2000.

Sincerely,

/s/ Daniel W. Pishny
Daniel W. Pishny
President

AGREED BY

Maxus Real Property Investors-Four, L.P.        Farrington Properties, Inc.



/s/ Daniel W. Pishny                            /s/ Bradley J. Schafer
Daniel W. Pishny                                Bradley J. Schafer
President of Maxus Capital Corp,                SCHAFERICHARDSON, INC.
General Partner                                 Managing Agent for Farrington
                                                Properties, Inc.
# C_2023126EN.01000101.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 April 2023

(2023/C 126/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0940 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9901 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,3990 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,429 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 376,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6818 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9314 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,0619 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6325 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4719 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5877 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7349 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4512 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 434,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,6107 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5265 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 330,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8120 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,604 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,032 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5497 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8441 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,7215 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0940

JPY

Japanese yen

143,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87685

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3265

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9901

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,3990

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,429

HUF

Hungarian forint

376,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6818

RON

Romanian leu

4,9314

TRY

Turkish lira

21,0619

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6325

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4719

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5877

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7349

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4512

KRW

South Korean won

1 434,80

ZAR

South African rand

19,6107

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5265

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 330,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8120

PHP

Philippine peso

59,604

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,032

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5497

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8441

INR

Indian rupee

89,7215

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 12.2

I, Vittorio Notarpietro, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2014



/s/ Vittorio NotarpietroName:

Vittorio NotarpietroTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
## SERVE D MARC H 7 , 201 2 OErhRTIvlEN TO F ii-^ANSPORTATIO N U.S . DEPARTMEN T OFTRANSPORTATIO N .-CKh T 0PEH/\TI0NS OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C ?l;!?f!AR- 8 A 9 : 3 8 I N THEMATTERO F CROWCO N DETECTIO N INSTRUMENT S LIMITE D FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Proceeding ) FDM S NO . FAA-2012-002 6 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 2010SO700428) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La

w Judg e .I.E . Sullivan . Al l futur e pleading s an dothe r

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n the Judge , the FA

A Hearin g Docket , andthe othe r persori s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Chie f Administrativ e La Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFDM S NO . FAA-2012-002 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Flearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Bria n S . Sullivan , Responden l ' s Counse l Dinsmor c & Shohl , LL P 255E . Fift

hStreet , Suit e 190 0 Cincinnati , O H 4520 2 TEL : 513-977-823 3 FAX : 513-977-814 1 Geral dA . Ellis , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P . O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e J.E . SuWiwau , Adminisirafiv e La w ,ludg, e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . - • • Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administralion , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh l Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC'430 .

_ 9 _
#### § 16.10 Sales of securities at an office of a Federal savings association.

Sales of securities of a Federal savings association or its affiliates at an office of a Federal savings association may be made only in accordance with the provisions of 12 CFR 163.76. For the purpose of this section, “affiliate” has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 161.4.

[82 FR 8108, Jan. 23, 2017]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9


                  AMENDMENT #2 TO COMMERCIAL LAND LEASE, DATED
                 31 DECEMBER 1991, BETWEEN PHILIP R. THOMAS AND
                       WAYNE HEIRTZLER THOMAS, OWNERS, AND
                            THOMAS GROUP, INC. LESSEE

The following Amendment to that certain Commercial Lease of December 31, 1991
between OWNERS and LESSEE is hereby adopted:

         "14.1    After sixteen (16) years from the date of this lease, OWNER
                  may, by giving one year's notice to LESSEE, purchase LESSEE's
                  rights under this lease and terminate the lease on the
                  following terms and conditions:"

Done and signed by the parties on 1 February, 1993 in the presence of the
subscribing witness.

WITNESSES:







                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Philip R. Thomas, Owner
-----------------------------------





                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Wayne Heirtzler Thomas, Owner





-----------------------------------
                                    Thomas Group, Inc., Lessee





                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Alex W. Young
                                    President and Chief Operating Officer