alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2387

FABIOLA CHINO TECONGO; E.J.C.C.,

 Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 13, 2021 Decided: October 13, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fabiola Chino Tecongo, E.J.C.C., Appellants Pro Se. Lynda Do, Ann M. Welhaf, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fabiola Chino Tecongo and her minor child, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) declining to consider 

their appeal by certification pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(c) (2021) and dismissing the

appeal as untimely. Because we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to exercise 

its discretionary authority to certify the case, we dismiss the petition for review. See 

Abdulla v. Att’y Gen., 971 F.3d 409, 414 (3d Cir. 2020) (“[C]oncluding that, as a general 

matter, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to self-certify an appeal” and 

collecting cases). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
§ 192.355 Subscription rights for eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders. ( a ) *Eligible account holders.* A savings association must give each eligible account holder subscription rights to purchase conversion shares in an amount equal to the greater of: ( 1 ) The maximum purchase limitation established for the community offering or the public offering under § 192.395;
( 2 ) One-tenth of one percent of the total stock offering; or
( 3 ) Fifteen times the following number: The total number of conversion shares that the savings association will issue, multiplied by the following fraction. The numerator is the total qualifying deposit of the eligible account holder. The denominator is the total qualifying deposits of all eligible account holders. The savings association must round down the product of this multiplied fraction to the next whole number.
( b ) *Supplemental eligible account holders.* The savings association must give subscription rights to purchase shares to each supplemental eligible account holder in the same amount as described in paragraph (a) of this section, except that the savings association must compute the fraction described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section as follows: The numerator is the total qualifying deposit of the supplemental eligible account holder. The denominator is the total qualifying deposits of all supplemental eligible account holders.
§ 192.275 Filing revised proxy materials. ( a ) *In general.* A savings association must file revised proxy solicitation materials as an amendment to its application for conversion. The proxy solicitation materials must be in the form in which it furnished the materials to its members.
( b ) *Content of filing.* To revise its proxy solicitation materials, the savings association must file: ( 1 ) Its revised proxy materials as required by Form PS;
( 2 ) Its revised form of proxy, if applicable;
( 3 ) Any additional proxy solicitation material subject to § 192.270; and
( 4 ) A copy of the revised proxy solicitation materials marked to clearly indicate changes from the prior filing.
( c ) *When to file.* The savings association must file no later than the date that it sends or gives the proxy solicitation material to its members. The savings association must indicate the date that it will release the materials.
( d ) *Material not required to be filed.* Unless requested by the appropriate Federal banking agency, the savings association does not have to file copies of replies to inquiries from its members or copies of communications that merely request members to sign and return proxy forms.
#### UNITED STATES v. METAL PRODUCTS CO.

[61 C. Cls. 997; 270 U. S. 670]

On appeal. *Dismissed*by the Supreme Court April 12, 1926, on motion of appellant, and mandate granted.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN SCOTT SUTHERLAND ABBOTT,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D14-4617

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 14, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Lake County,

Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.

Justin M. Bleakley, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Liles, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D892 (Fla. 5th DCA Apr. 8, 

2016).

PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 261.20 General. ( a ) All confidential supervisory information and other nonpublic information, including but not limited to information made available under this subpart, remains the property of the Board, and except as otherwise provided in this regulation, no person, entity, agency, or authority to whom the information is made available or who otherwise possesses the information, including any officer, director, employee, or agent thereof, may use any such information for an unauthorized purpose or disclose any such information without the prior written permission of the General Counsel.
( b ) The disclosure of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information in accordance with this subpart shall not constitute a waiver by the Board of any applicable privileges.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to limit or restrict the authority of the Board to impose any additional conditions or limitations on the use and disclosure of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information. Further, nothing in this subpart shall be construed to limit or restrict the authority of the Board to make discretionary disclosures of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information in addition to the disclosures expressly provided for in this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation®, (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M.
Christine Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ M. Christine
Jacobs M. Christine JacobsChief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Theragenics Corporation® and
will be retained by Theragenics Corporation® and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 233.3 Designated payment systems. The following payment systems could be used by participants in connection with, or to facilitate, a restricted transaction: ( a ) Automated clearing house systems;
( b ) Card systems;
( c ) Check collection systems;
( d ) Money transmitting businesses solely to the extent they ( 1 ) Engage in the transmission of funds, which does not include check cashing, currency exchange, or the issuance or redemption of money orders, travelers' checks, and other similar instruments; and
( 2 ) Permit customers to initiate transmission of funds transactions remotely from a location other than a physical office of the money transmitting business; and
( e ) Wire transfer systems.
Mario F. Fabrizio July 11 , 2015

290 Calamus Circle Medina, MN 55340 Cell (612) 360

- 9017

Email: mario@fabrizios.com

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Petition for Amendment to Exemption 11950 Issued to Mario F. Fabrizio Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1472)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Mario F. Fabrizio

, referred to herea fter as the P etitioner, requests that the FAA grant an amendment

to the referenced exemption to include the following items:

1) Modify references from “ Mario F. Fabrizio ” to “ Mario F. Fabrizio dba Planeview Services ”

Since submitting the original exemption request, the Petitioner has established a “ dba ” name for providing the commercial services and desires to have this accurately reflected.

2) Expand the target for services from the originally requested “ fire departments and other emergency service organizations ” to include “ and any other organizations or individuals ”

The ability to provide commercially reasonable services requires the Petitioner to have the flexibility to reach larger target markets, thereby enabling a cost efficiency, and furthering the business of the Petitioner. This only effects the target audience to which services will be potentially marketed. All operations, use and limitations of the UAS will remain unchanged from the previously granted exemption.

3) Add the DJI Phantom 3 Professional to the exemption

The original exemption include d the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. The Petitioner desires to also use the DJI Phantom 3 professional in its operations. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional is, in all practical aspects of its flight characteristics, the same as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ which was

pre viously granted in the original exemption. The difference lies mainly in the camera system and its associated software. All previous safety standards and features from the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + are incorporated into the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as some additional, and more intuitive, remote control functions.

The Petitioner will use the DJI Phantom 3 Professional in its business the same way, in an accordance with the same procedures , use and limitations, as originally granted.

The operator ’ s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional, as well as the quick start manual, are

available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3/download . The file size is 13.2mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website due to

Respectfully submitted

Mario F. Fabrizio
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,055
<PP&E>                                          49,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,166
<BONDS>                                         22,031
<COMMON>                                        22,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,964
<SALES>                                        212,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,068
<CGS>                                          156,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
STAJ

4L o

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Richard W. Corey. Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

Post Office Box 2815

Sacramento. CA 5812

Dear Mr. Corey:

On April 7, 2015, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We

have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness

criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.

APCD/AQMD__j_Rule # [ Rule Title

Monterey Bay 201 Sources Not Requiring Permits

Monterey Bay 1002 Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks

Reduction of NOx Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired, South Coast 1 1 1 1 Fan-Type Furnaces

Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly South Coast 1151 Line Coating Operations

South Coast 1 153.1 Emissions of Nitrogen from Commercial Food Oven

San Joaquin 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type Central Furnaces Vail ey

Ventura County 74.33 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transfer or Dispensing

This addresses all of the SIP revisions in CARB’s April 7, 2015 submittal. In the coming months we will

review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k).

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

APR 3 0 2015

Sincerely,

Jordan

Director. Air Division

f’r,n ted Oil l?e ye/ed Paper
cc: Richard Stedman

Air Pollution Control Officer

Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District

245 X0 Silver Cloud Court

Monterey. California 93940

Sevecl Sadredin

Executive Director Air Pollution Control Officer

San .Toaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

1990 East Gettysburg Avenue

Presno California 03726

Barry Wallerstein

Executive Officer

South Coast Air Quality Management District

21 X65 Copley Drive

Diamond Bar, California 91 7654 1 X2

Mike Villegas

Air Pollution Control Ofticer

Ventura Counts’ Air Pollution Control District

(6O County Square Drive

Second Floor

Ventura. California 93003

Karen Magliano. Chief

Air Quality Planning and Science Division

Calilbrnia \ir Resources Board

Post Office Box 2X15

Sacramento. CA 958 12
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
# C_2023303EN.01000201.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 August 2023

(2023/C 303/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4537 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85643 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,8950 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9564 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,117 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 381,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4690 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9390 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,6164 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6809 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4672 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4770 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8248 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4641 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 430,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1578 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8783 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 521,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0149 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,227 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,898 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2524 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1243 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,3040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0808

JPY

Japanese yen

157,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4537

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85643

SEK

Swedish krona

11,8950

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9564

ISK

Iceland króna

143,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,117

HUF

Hungarian forint

381,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4690

RON

Romanian leu

4,9390

TRY

Turkish lira

28,6164

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6809

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4672

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4770

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8248

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4641

KRW

South Korean won

1 430,58

ZAR

South African rand

20,1578

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8783

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 521,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0149

PHP

Philippine peso

61,227

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,898

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2524

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1243

INR

Indian rupee

89,3040

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
42571.

#### KIMBELL v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 6, 1967

Decided March 17, 1967.

*Benjamin B. Garland,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, E. J. Summerour, Assistant Attorneys General, John A. Sligh, Jr., Richard W. Watkins, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

1. The State Highway Department brought condemnation proceedings against J. R. Kimbell to acquire a part of condemnee’s land for construction of an interstate highway. In examining one of its witnesses on the trial, condemnor asked the witness whether condemnee could “go to the court of ordinary” to acquire a private way into that portion of his property which would be landlocked by the highway. While the court correctly excluded the testimony as to a legal conclusion, which this question was calculated to elicit, nevertheless the question merely suggested matter which the jury would be authorized to take into consideration in fixing consequential damages to the land not taken. See *State Hwy. Dept. v. Ball,*112 Ga. App. 480, 483 (145 SE2d 577). The question therefore did not furnish any basis for the grant of a mistrial.

2. The second enumeration alleges error in the court’s charge to the jury, as to which there was no objection made on the trial. This ground has no merit. *Georgia Power Co. v. Maddox,*113 Ga. App. 642, 647 (3) (149 SE2d 393); *Palmer v. Stevens,*115 Ga. App. 398 (17).

*Judgment affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24311]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans will be held on Monday, 
November 2, 2009, in the Coolidge Room at the Washington Marriot 
Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW., Washington, DC, from 8 a.m. 
to 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs with an on-going assessment of the effectiveness of 
the policies, organizational structures, and services of the Department 
in assisting homeless Veterans. The Committee shall assemble and review 
information relating to the needs of homeless Veterans and provide on-
going advice on the most appropriate means of providing assistance to 
homeless Veterans. The Committee will make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding such activities.
    The agenda will include briefings from VA and other officials 
regarding services for homeless Veterans. The Committee will also 
discuss final preparation of its upcoming annual report and 
recommendations to the Secretary.
    Those wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Pete 
Dougherty, Department of Veterans Affairs, at (202) 461-7401. No time 
will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the public. 
However, the Committee will accept written comments from interested 
parties on issues affecting homeless Veterans. Such comments should be 
referred to the Committee at the following address: Advisory Committee 
on Homeless Veterans, Homeless Veterans Programs Office (075D), U.S. 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20420.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24311 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P