alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2704 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2704

  To give the consent of Congress to an agreement or compact between 
Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas for the purpose of 
    establishing an all-hazard mitigation, readiness, response, and 
                 recovery plan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2007

   Mr. Bilirakis (for himself and Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To give the consent of Congress to an agreement or compact between 
Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas for the purpose of 
    establishing an all-hazard mitigation, readiness, response, and 
                 recovery plan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gulf Coast All-Hazard Readiness Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CONSENT OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Consent.--The consent of Congress is given to any number of the 
Gulf Coast States to negotiate and enter into an agreement or compact 
that meets the following requirements:
            (1) The agreement or compact is consented to by the 
        legislatures of each of the participating Gulf Coast States 
        through legislation enacted not later than December 31, 2010.
            (2) The agreement or compact is entered into primarily for 
        the purpose of establishing a plan for all-hazard mitigation, 
        readiness, response, and recovery.
            (3) The agreement or compact establishes a multi-state all-
        hazard fund generated by participating Gulf Coast States to be 
        utilized when a disaster affects those States.
            (4) The agreement or compact requires each of the 
        participating Gulf Coast States to appoint a commissioner to 
        organize the operation, management, and disbursement of the 
        multi-state all-hazard fund in coordination with the other 
        commissioners.
            (5) The agreement or compact prohibits participating Gulf 
        Coast States from taking an action prohibited by Federal law at 
        the time of such action.
    (b) Gulf Coast States Defined.--As used in this section, the term 
``Gulf Coast States'' means Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, 
and Texas.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Return Travel on Recently Expired U.S. Passports

# 									Return Travel on Recently Expired U.S. Passports							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 24, 2021

The welfare and safety of U.S. citizens abroad is the highest priority of the Department of State. To alleviate travel difficulties and unprecedented appointment backlogs created by the global COVID-19 pandemic, the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security are working together to facilitate U.S. citizens’ return to the United States.

U.S. citizens currently overseas whose passports expired on or after January 1, 2020, may be able to use their expired U.S. passport for direct return travel to the United States until December 31, 2021. Certain criteria apply, and we encourage U.S. citizens to confirm their eligibility for traveling on an expired passport at COVID-19 Traveler Information prior to finalizing travel arrangements.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (DHS CBP) officers will accept for admission certain expired U.S. passports, thereby assisting U.S. citizens who have been affected by appointment backlogs at embassies and consulates overseas caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recently expired passports cannot be used to travel from the United States to an international destination or to travel to a foreign country for any length of stay longer than an airport connection en route to the United States or to a United States territory.

The State Department continues to strongly recommend U.S. citizens reconsider travel abroad and postpone their trips if possible. We also remind U.S. citizens who wish to return to the United States that proof of a negative COVID-19 test result, taken within 72 hours of their flight’s departure, is required for air travel to the United States. For those wishing to renew their passport upon their return to the United States, current processing times can be found on the U.S. Passports page.

For more information, please see our website at travel.state.gov.

For press inquiries, please contact CAPRESSREQUESTS@state.gov.

****

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsCOVID-19Global HealthGlobal HealthOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### § 1271.22 Computer data.

Nothing in this subpart shall preclude a Bank from arranging with any financial regulatory agency to transmit or allow access to confidential regulatory information with the consent of such agency by means of an electronic computer system. Any such arrangement shall ensure the security of the computerized data stored in a Bank's computer and restrict access to such data in order to preserve confidentiality in a manner agreed upon by the Bank and the financial regulatory agency.
# C_2021480EN.01000701.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2021/C 480/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Vatican City State

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: The Vatican City State

Subject of commemoration: The 700th anniversary of the death of Dante Alighieri

Description of the design: The design features a portrait of Dante and Palazzo Vecchio in Florence. At the top right, in semi-circle, is the name of the issuing country ‘CITTÀ DEL VATICANO’. At the bottom is the inscription ‘Dante’ and underneath are the years ‘1321-2021’ and the name of the artist ‘P. DANIELE’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 86 000

Date of issue: October 2021

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1998, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         534,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,593,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                   372,600
<INVENTORY>                                 24,607,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,705,726
<PP&E>                                      34,965,398
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,295,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,612,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,258,380
<BONDS>                                        800,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,289
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,190,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,612,580
<SALES>                                     67,166,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,166,607
<CGS>                                       43,924,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,924,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,480,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             756,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                   155,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (114,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (114,468)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.25


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$115,619.60                Milpitas, California                     June 6, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com,  Inc.,  promises to pay Michele Ware the sum of
One hundred and fifteen  thousand six hundred  nineteen  dollars and sixty cents
($115,619.60)  with  interest  at the rate of Ten  Percent per annum until paid.
Interest  payable  quarterly  commencing  on July 15, 2000 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2000.  Principal of $115,619.60 is due in one payment on July 24, 2000.
Principal may be paid in whole or in part prior to the due date without  penalty
or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: /S/MICHAEL M. WHEELER
    ---------------------
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller
# C_2010285EN.01001201.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/12

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2010/C 285/04

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 19/09/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Finnmark fylkeskommune |
| Henry Karlsens plass 1 |
| 9815 Vadsø |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 19/09/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Finnmark fylkeskommune

Henry Karlsens plass 1

9815 Vadsø

NORWAY

http://www.ffk.no

Title of the aid measure

Development aid 2009 for Gaisa Næringshage

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Decision from Finnmark County Council

Date 25 August 2009

Ad hoc aid

x

| Gaisa Næringshage |
| --- |
| 9845 Tana |
| NORWAY |

Gaisa Næringshage

9845 Tana

NORWAY

Date of granting

Ad hoc aid

25.8.2009

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

x

Type of beneficiary

SME

x

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

NOK 0,25 (in millions)

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

x

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME-bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects
  (Article 31) | Fundamental research
  (Article 31(2)(a)) | ... % | |
| Industrial research
  (Article 31(2)(b)) | ... % | |
| Experimental development
  (Article 31(2)(c)) | 13,36 % | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME-bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects

(Article 31)

Fundamental research

(Article 31(2)(a))

... %

Industrial research

(Article 31(2)(b))

... %

Experimental development

(Article 31(2)(c))

13,36 %

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                        
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,345,923
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 14,531,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                       7,350
<INVENTORY>                                    4,021,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              20,632,714
<PP&E>                                        16,988,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,428,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                34,458,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,988,379
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                          20,354
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,334,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  34,458,451
<SALES>                                       20,106,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              20,106,575
<CGS>                                         15,804,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,325,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,752,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,223,514
<INCOME-TAX>                                      10,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,212,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,212,605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .050
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .050
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric Hopkins, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GPN Network, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003



/s/ Eric Hopkins
-----------------------
Eric Hopkins
Chief Financial Officer
§ 252.152 Applicability. ( a ) *General applicability.* ( 1 ) A foreign banking organization must: ( i ) Comply with the requirements of this subpart (other than the U.S. intermediate holding company requirement set forth in § 252.153) beginning on the first day of the ninth quarter following the date on which its average combined U.S. assets equal or exceed $100 billion; and
( ii ) Comply with the requirement to establish or designate a U.S. intermediate holding company requirement set forth in § 252.153(a) beginning on the first day of the ninth quarter following the date on which its average U.S. non-branch assets equal or exceed $50 billion or, if the foreign banking organization has established or designated a U.S. intermediate holding company pursuant to § 252.147, beginning on the first day following the date on which the foreign banking organization's average combined U.S. assets equal or exceed $100 billion.
( 2 ) *Changes in requirements following a change in category.* A foreign banking organization that changes from one category of banking organization described in § 252.5(c) through (e) to another of such categories must comply with the requirements applicable to the new category under this subpart no later than on the first day of the second quarter following the change in the foreign banking organization's category.
( b ) *Cessation of requirements* — ( 1 ) *Enhanced prudential standards applicable to the foreign banking organization.* Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a foreign banking organization will remain subject to the applicable requirements of this subpart until its combined U.S. assets are below $100 billion for each of four consecutive calendar quarters.
( 2 ) *Intermediate holding company requirement.* A foreign banking organization will remain subject to the U.S. intermediate holding company requirement set forth in § 252.153 until the sum of the total consolidated assets of the top-tier U.S. subsidiaries of the foreign banking organization (excluding any section 2(h)(2) company and DPC branch subsidiary) is below $50 billion for each of four consecutive calendar quarters, or until the foreign banking organization is subject to subpart N of this part and is in compliance with the U.S. intermediate holding company requirements as set forth in § 252.147.
[84 FR 59114, Nov. 1, 2019]
,s1tptPYtIP (gourf of,

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION,

CLE COMMISSION

2005-SC-000919-KB

V. IN SUPREME COURT

TO BE PUBLISHED

BRUCE WAYNE LOMINAC RESPONDENT

OPINION AND ORDER

The CLE Commission of the Kentucky Bar Association has recommended that

the Court find Respondent, Bruce Wayne Lominac, whose Bar Roster Address is 104

Falls Street, Suite B-1, London, Kentucky 40741 and whose KBA Member Number is

86232, in non-compliance with the minimum annual continuing legal education

requirements (MCLE) of SCR 3.661 for the 2004-2005 educational year. Pursuant to

our Show Cause Order of November 3, 2005, both the Movant and the Respondent

have submitted Responses outlining their respective positions.

Despite numerous warnings, Respondent failed to complete his MCLE

requirements during the time allotted for the 2004-2005 academic year. Similarly, he

failed to submit his Application for Extension of Time for Completion of Continuing Legal

Education in a timely manner-though it was due September 10, 2005 Respondent's

application was postmarked September 13, 2005 . Having reviewed the responses from

each of the parties, it seems clear that Respondent's reliance on his personal records of

CLE attendance, rather than on the official records maintained by the KBA, was a

primary reason for his non-compliance . Although it is unnecessary to provide any
detailed explanation of the circumstances which led to Respondent's deficiency, it must

be noted that Respondent's non-compliance was clearly documented in his official CLE

Record and it was his responsibility to correct any discrepancies which might have

existed between his personal file and the official record .

As such, upon the CLE Commission's certification of the Respondent's name to

this Court for CLE non-compliance under SCR 3.669, we find that Respondent has

failed to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law or

otherwise sanctioned . Wherefore, the following sanctions are adopted pursuant to SCR

3.370(10).

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

For his non-compliance with the minimum CLE requirements of SCR 3.661 for

the 2004-2005 educational year:

(1) We hereby ORDER Respondent to pay a fine in the amount of four hundred

dollars ($400.00), payable to the Kentucky Bar Association within twenty (20) days from

the date of this Order.

(2) It is also ORDERED that the CLE Commission apply back 2.5 hours of the

4.0 technologically-transmitted credits Respondent earned after June 30, 2005 to

Respondent's 2004-2005 CLE record .

(3) Respondent must complete and report to the CLE Commission the remaining

1 .25 live credits he needs for 2005 "apply-back" compliance within twenty (20) days of

the date of this Order. If Respondent fails to complete and report the credits in a timely

manner, he will be subject to suspension from practice for non-compliance upon motion

of the Commission and Order of this Court .
(4) Furthermore, pursuant to SCR 3.667(2), Respondent shall not apply for a

non-hardship extension for either the 2005-2006 or the 2006-2007 educational years.

All concur.

ENTERED : January 19, 2006.