alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December
31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,538
<INVENTORY>                                        279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,212
<PP&E>                                          50,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        187
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,120
<SALES>                                         15,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,987
<CGS>                                            4,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,458<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,636)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,636)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,636)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.37)
<FN>
<F1>Includes a $8.5 million charge for restructuring of the Company's worldwide
operations.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 192.120 Confidentiality of conversion information. ( a ) *Permitted disclosure.* A savings association may discuss information about its conversion with individuals that the savings association authorizes to prepare documents for its conversion.
( b ) *Confidential information.* Except as permitted under paragraph (a) of this section, a savings association must keep all information about its conversion confidential until its board of directors adopts the plan of conversion.
( c ) *Violations of confidentiality.* If a savings association violates this section, the appropriate Federal banking agency may require the savings association to take remedial action. For example, the appropriate Federal banking agency may require the savings association to take any or all of the following actions: ( 1 ) Publicly announce that the savings association is considering a conversion;
( 2 ) Set an eligibility record date acceptable to the appropriate Federal banking agency;
( 3 ) Limit the subscription rights of any person who violates or aids a violation of this section; or
( 4 ) Any other action to assure that the conversion is fair and equitable.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 292 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 141
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 292

                          [Report No. 108-250]

   To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War 
  Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should 
                        especially be displayed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 3, 2003

    Additional sponsors: Mr. Porter, Mr. Simmons, and Mr. Strickland

                           September 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War 
  Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should 
                        especially be displayed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Korean War Veterans Recognition Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VETERANS ARMISTICE DAY.

     Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day, July 27;'' 
after ``July 4;''.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 141

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 292

                          [Report No. 108-250]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War 
  Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should 
                        especially be displayed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 96-11366

_______________________

NATIONAL HOUSING EXCHANGE, INC, a North Carolina Corporation,

Plaintiff,

DAVID J KRUPP, arf National Housing Exchange, Inc,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

NATIONAL HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellee

versus
ARAPAHO CAR WASH, A Texas General Partnership; THOMAS H STEWART; DAVID M WARREN,
Defendants - Counter Claimants - Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Dallas Division

_________________________________________________________________ August 8, 1997 Before JONES, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

David R. Krupp, receiver for National Housing Exchange,

later replaced by National Heritage Life Insurance Company (“NHL”),brought this suit against Arapaho Car Wash Thomas H. Stewart, and

David M. Warren (collectively, “Arapaho”) to collect on a
promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment for

NHL and subsequently denied Arapaho’s Motion to Enforce Settlement

Agreement . Arapaho argues that there was insufficient summary
judgment evidence to establis h the chain of title giving NHL
ownership of the note and guarantees. Arapaho also challenges the

district court’s conclusion that the parties did not have a

settlement agreement in writing, signed and filed with the court as
required by Texas law. After hearing oral argument, reviewing the
briefs, the authorities cited therein and the record, we find no
reversible error of fact or law. Thus, we AFFIRM the judgment of

the district court.

AFFIRMED.
### Approximate water-level changes in wells completed in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, 1977-87 and 1986-87, and measured compaction, 1973-87, in the Houston-Galveston region, Texas

By: James F. Williams IIIC. E. Ranzau Jr.W. B. Lind

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr87108

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

This report consists of: (1) four maps that present data on water level changes during 1977-87 and 1986-87 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, and in the Houston-Galveston region, Texas, and (2) one set of graphs and one map that present data on land subsidence caused by compaction of sub-surface materials for 1973-87. (USGS)

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 221.7 Supplement: Maximum loan value of margin stock and other collateral. ( a ) *Maximum loan value of margin stock.* The maximum loan value of any margin stock is fifty per cent of its current market value.
( b ) *Maximum loan value of nonmargin stock and all other collateral.* The maximum loan value of nonmargin stock and all other collateral except puts, calls, or combinations thereof is their good faith loan value.
( c ) *Maximum loan value of options.* Except for options that qualify as margin stock, puts, calls, and combinations thereof have no loan value.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated April 11, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Harry's
Farmers Market, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statements of Harry's Farmers Market, Inc. and Subsidiaries on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-74348, effective January 21, 1994, File No. 33-81118,
effective July 1, 1994, File No. 33-81120, effective July 1, 1994, File No. 33-
91924, effective May 4, 1995, File No. 333-10403, effective August 19, 1996,
File No. 333-56025 effective June 4, 1998, File No. 333-36292, effective May 4,
2000 and File No. 333-53676, effective January 12, 2001).


                                                /s/ Grant Thorton LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
May 15, 2001
42459, 42460.

#### BYARS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; and vice versa.

*Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 9, 1967

Decided March 10, 1967.

Frankum, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal and a cross appeal wherein the notices of appeal were filed in the trial court on July 15, 1966, and on August 2, 1966, respectively. The transcript of the evidence and proceedings was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court on October 3, 1966. No order extending the time for filing the transcript was procured by either appellant or cross appellant. Neither party designated the transcript to be omitted on appeal, and it must be presumed, therefore, that the transcript is essential to a consideration of the appeals. Under the provisions of Sec. 11 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 27), the transcript not having been filed within 30 days from the date the notice of appeal was filed, and under the ruling in *Davis v. Davis,*222 Ga. 579 (151 SE2d 123), these appeals must be dismissed.

*Appeal and cross appeal dismissed.*

*369
      *Jack K. Bohler,*for appellant.

*Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Scott Charlton,*for appellee.
USA

Reference: 0/01/01-02.02.187

Your reference:

Qur reference: fjlContact Person: Laurence Fontana Jungo

Tel. +41 31 32304 10, Fax +41 31 325 92 12, Laurence.fontana-jungo@bazl.admin.ch

Ittigen, 27 August 2013

Deciaration of Reciprocity

Dear Mr. Gretch IQfZ4— PLLLThe Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith deciares, that it will consider applicationsby U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland in accordance with theprovisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the United States of

America, dated 21 June 2010, and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to the Agreement, on

the basis of comity and reciprocity.

Yours sincerely

Marcel Zuckschwercit Laurence Fontana Jungo

Director Chief Negotiator Air Services AgreementsHead Aviation Policy and Strategy

Federal Office of Clvii AviationMühlestrasse 3, 3063 IttigenPostal address: CH-3003 Bern

Tel. +41 31 325 80 39/40, Fax +41 31 325 80 32

www.aviation.admin.ch
#### § 238.99 Interlocking relationships permitted pursuant to Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

A management official or prospective management official of a depository organization may enter into an otherwise prohibited interlocking relationship with another depository organization for a period of up to 10 years if such relationship is approved by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation pursuant to section 13(k)(1)(A)(v) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1823(k)(1)(A)(v)).
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation ® , (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M.
Christine Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
    Report.
 
 
 By: /s/ M.
Christine Jacobs
 M.
Christine Jacobs
 Chief
Executive Officer
 May 13,
2005
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Theragenics Corporation ® and will
be retained by Theragenics Corporation ® and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.2
Criteria For Incentive Compensation Program Awards

         Each November our Compensation Committee sets financial targets for the
following calendar year for Riviera Las Vegas, Riviera Black Hawk and Riviera
Corporate. Officers and employees in any of these three groups will be eligible
for Incentive Compensation Program awards if the pre-determined financial
targets are achieved. There are various levels of incentive bonuses:

o        Riviera Las Vegas has five incentive bonus levels as follows: $7,000;
         $10,000; $15,000; $20,000; and $200,000.
o        Riviera Black Hawk has six incentive bonus levels as follows: $5,000;
         $10,000; $15,000; $20,000; $25,000; and $50,000.
o        Riviera Corporate has two incentive bonus levels as follows:
         $20,000 and $100,000.

         The position held by an individual in each respective group above
determines the Incentive Compensation Program bonus level for which that
individual is eligible. Our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
has discretion to change the bonus level associated with any position.

         Executive officers are eligible for the following bonus levels: Mr.
Westerman does not participate in the Incentive Compensation Plan, Mr. Vannucci
participates in the Riviera Las Vegas Plan at the $200,000 level and Messers
Krohn, Johnson and Marchionne participate in the Riviera Corporate Plan at the
$100,000 level.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Harbor BioSciences, Inc. 

San Diego, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements: No. 333-18725 on Form S-8 to Form S-4,No. 333-69727 on Form S-3, No. 333-72853 on Form S-3, No. 333-92185 on Form S-8, No. 333-51286 on Form S-8, No. 333-65712 on Form S-8, No. 333-101219 on Form S-8, No. 333-101221 on Form S-3, No. 333-103851 onForm S-3, No. 333-105378 on Form S-3, No. 333-106860 on Form S-8, No. 333-121216 on Form S-8, No. 333-130670 on Form S-8, No. 333-135095 on Form S-3, No. 333-136554 on Form S-3, No. 333-136555 on Form S-8,No. 333-148088 on Form S-8, No. 333-156111 on Form S-8, No. 333-163936 on Form S-8 of Harbor BioSciences, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2010 relating to the financial statements of Harbor BioSciences, Inc. which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

San Diego,California 

March 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Autonomous
Technologies Corporation 12-31-96 financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,980,036
<SECURITIES>                                 9,425,754
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    262,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,731,415
<PP&E>                                         774,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                 321,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,144,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,463,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,632
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,516,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,144,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,563,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,008,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,008,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,008,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1408.10 Review procedures. ( a ) Unless an oral hearing is required by § 1408.23(d), the Corporation's review shall be a review of the written record of the claim.
( b ) If an oral hearing is required under § 1408.23(d) the Corporation shall provide the debtor with a reasonable opportunity for such a hearing. The oral hearing, however, shall not be an adversarial adjudication and need not take the form of a formal evidentiary hearing. All significant matters discussed at the hearing, however, will be carefully documented.
( c ) Any review required by this part, whether a review of the written record or an oral hearing, shall be conducted by a hearing official. In the case of a salary offset, the hearing official shall not be under the supervision or control of the Chairman of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.
( d ) The Corporation may be represented by legal counsel. The debtor may represent himself or herself or may be represented by an individual of the debtor's choice and at the debtor's expense.
( e ) The hearing official shall issue a final written decision based on documentary evidence and, if applicable, information developed at an oral hearing. The written decision shall be issued as soon as practicable after the review but not later than 60 days after the date on which the request for review was received by the Corporation, unless the debtor requests a delay in the proceedings. A delay in the proceedings shall be granted if the hearing official determines, in his or her sole discretion, that there is good cause to grant the delay. If a delay is granted, the 60-day decision period shall be extended by the number of days by which the review was postponed.
( f ) Upon issuance of the written opinion, the Corporation shall promptly notify the debtor of the hearing official's decision. Said notification shall include a copy of the written decision issued by the hearing official pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section.