alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

p0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138944

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138944 COA: 283288 Wayne CC: 07-013696-FC RICKY ALLEN HYSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 252.11 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 321-338a, 1818, 1831p-1, 3906-3909, 5365.
( b ) *Purpose.* This subpart implements section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)), which requires state member banks with total consolidated assets of greater than $250 billion to conduct stress tests. This subpart also establishes definitions of stress tests and related terms, methodologies for conducting stress tests, and reporting and disclosure requirements.
[84 FR 59100, Nov. 1, 2019]
42589.

#### DAVIS HOUSE, INC. v. MINK.

Quillian, Judge.

Appeal was taken from the overruling of a general demurrer to the petition. Subsequent to the case being docketed in this court, appellee, plaintiff below, filed a material amendment to her petition. Appellee then filed her written motion to dismiss the appeal, attaching thereto a certified copy of the amendment and of the order allowing the same filed. *Held:*

The trial judge having jurisdiction to allow the amendment *(Westbrook v. Nationwide Ins. Co.,*113 Ga. App. 299, 300 (147 SE2d 819); *Ware v. Martin,*208 Ga. 330 (3) (66 SE2d 737)), the ruling enumerated as error, not going to the petition as amended, has become moot, and a reversal would be *265of no benefit to the appellant. *Gillon v. Johns,*105 Ga. App. 599, 600 (125 SE2d 70); *Studdard v. Evans,*108 Ga. App. 819, 821 (135 SE2d 60).

*Frankum, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*

Argued February 8, 1967

Decided February 17, 1967.

*Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Scott Charlton,*for appellant.

*Schell & Flowers, Ed B. Flowers,*for appellee.

Since the question raised became moot as a result of the appellee’s action after the case was docketed in this court, the appeal is dismissed with costs of appeal assessed against the appellee. *Gillon v. Johns,*105 Ga. App. 599, 600, supra;*Baird v. City of Atlanta,*131 Ga. 451 (2) (62 SE 525).

*Appeal dismissed.*
#### Prince Hardy *v.*Conyer Scott.

Maltbie, C. J., A.veby, Brown, Jennings and Ells, Js.

Argued March 5

decided April 4, 1941.

*Franklin Coeller,*for the appellant (defendant).

*723
      *William L. Beers,*with whom, on the brief, was *George E. Beers,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff deeded the property in question to the defendant and the latter’s wife, Francener Scott, reserving a life use and on condition that the Scotts support him during his life, with reversion to the grantor on breach of the condition; Francener Scott died intestate about two years before the bringing of the action leaving the defendant as her sole heir-at-law and successor in title; the condition of the deed was broken by the defendant and the plaintiff was entitled to possession and title to the premises. The defendant demurred because neither the administrator, heirs or personal representatives of Francener were made parties. The demurrer was overruled and this action was assigned as error. Errors in the charge were also assigned but these are not before us since there is no finding in the record.

The demurrer admitted facts well pleaded. *State’s Attorney*v. *Selectmen of Branford,*59 Conn. 402, 411, 22 Atl. 336. It therefore admitted the allegation that the defendant was Francener’s sole heir-at-law. This might have been so. General Statutes, § 5156. Title to intestate lands vests at once in the heirs “subject only to such rights as might arise out of the need to come upon them to satisfy debts and expenses of administration, and distribution was not necessary to confer title.” *Perkins*v. *August,*109 Conn. 452, 456, 146 Atl. 831; *Bowen*v. *Morgillo,*127 Conn. 161, 168, 14 Atl. (2d) 724. Extraneous facts may exist which would disclose a deficiency of necessary parties but these could not be taken advantage of by demurrer.

There is no error.
§ 252.167 Disclosure requirements for resolution Covered IHCs. ( a ) A resolution Covered IHC that has any outstanding eligible external debt securities must publicly disclose a description of the financial consequences to unsecured debtholders of the resolution Covered IHC entering into a resolution proceeding in which the resolution Covered IHC is the only entity in the United States that would be subject to the resolution proceeding.
( b ) A resolution Covered IHC must provide the disclosure required by paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) In the offering documents for all of its eligible external debt securities; and
( 2 ) Either: ( i ) On the resolution Covered IHC's Web site; or
( ii ) In more than one public financial report or other public regulatory reports, provided that the resolution Covered IHC publicly provides a summary table specifically indicating the location(s) of this disclosure.
CHARLES L. JOEKEL
                         TEXAS STAFFING SERVICES, INC.
                        3000 Richmond Avenue, Suite 120
                              Houston, Texas 77098
                              Phone (713) 529-0202
                               Fax (713) 524-4454


                                   May 4, 2000

                          PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

VIA FACSIMILE:  713-771-7536

Elorian Landers, President
Internet Venture Group, Inc.
9307 West Sam Houston Parkway
Building 100
Houston, Texas  77099

RE:     Internet Venture Group, Inc. ("iVG"); Proposed purchase of the stock of
        Texas Staffing Services, Inc., d/b/a Trendsetter Staffing Services
        ("TSS") from Charles L. Joekel ("Joekel"); First Amendment to the Letter
        of Intent ("LOI") dated April 25, 2000

Dear Elorian:

     This letter is the First Amendment to the Letter of Intent executed between
iVG and TSS on April 25, 2000. As indicated by the  execution of this  agreement
by iVG.

     Paragraph II.4 is amended to add the following to the end of the paragraph:

               "It is agreed that any Confidentiality  Agreement entered into by
               the  Purchaser,  iVG, with any third party to which  Confidential
               Information   of   the   Company   is   to  be   provided,   such
               Confidentiality   Agreement   entered   into  to   protect   such
               Confidential  Information  from  disclosure  by such third party,
               shall not alter,  amend, or release the Purchaser,  iVG, from its
               principal  and  primary  duty  under  this  LOI  to  protect  the
               confidentiality of the Confidential Information,  notwithstanding
               the fact that the Seller or the Company,  as the case may be, may
               be a party to and enter into such Confidentiality  Agreement, the
               effect of which is to provide  the  Company  with an  independent
               right  and  cause  of  action,  distinct  from  iVG,  to  protect
               confidentiality    of   its    information   and   enforce   such
               Confidentiality Agreement."

<PAGE>


Elorian Landers, President
Internet Venture Group
May 4, 2000
Page 2

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        CHARLES L. JOEKEL (Seller)


                                        ----------------------------------------

AGREED AND ACCEPTED on this _________ day of ____________, 2000.

INTERNET VENTURE GROUP, INC. (Purchaser)


By: ------------------------------
    Elorian Landers, President


c:      Drew N. Bagot, Esq.
        Vial, Hamilton, Koch & Knox, LLP
        1717 Main Street, Suite 4400
        Dallas, Texas  75201

c:      Thomas G. Gruenert, Esq.
        7707 Fannin, Suite 203
        Houston, Texas  77054
427 A.2d 239

#### Commonwealth v. Dressler, Appellant.

Argued March 18, 1980.

Brian C. Dressier, appellant, in propria persona;

Ronald T. Williamson, Assistant District Attorney, submitted a brief on behalf of Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.

Order affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

San Diego,California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the following registration statements: No. 333-18725 on Form S-8 to Form S-4, No. 333-18725 on Form S-3 to Form S-4, No. 333-56155 on Form S-3, No. 333-56157 on Form S-3, No. 333-69725 on Form S-3, No. 333-69727 onForm S-3, No. 333-72853 on Form S-3, No. 333-92179 on Form S-3, No. 333-92185 on Form S-8, No. 333-96181 on Form S-3, No. 333-34180 on Form S-3, No. 333-51284 on Form S-3, No. 333-51286 on Form S-8,No. 333-65712 on Form S-8, No. 333-75860 on Form S-3, No. 333-83372 on Form S-3, No. 333-101219 on Form S-8, No. 333-101221 on Form S-3, No. 333-13831 on Form S-3, No. 333-103851 on Form S-3, No. 333-105378 onForm S-3, No. 333-106835 on Form S-3, No. 333-106860 on Form S-8, No. 333-107318 on Form S-3, and No. 333-121216 on Form S-8, No. 333-126458 on Form S-3, No. 333-130670 on Form S-8, No. 333-135095 on Form S-3,No. 333-136554 on Form S-3, No. 333-136555 on Form S-8, No. 333-148088 on Form S-8, No. 333-156111 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 30, 2009 relating to the financial statements of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. includedin this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 30, 2009
§ 217.303 Temporary exclusions from total leverage exposure. ( a ) *In general.* Subject to paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section and notwithstanding any other requirement in this part, when calculating on-balance sheet assets as of each day of a reporting quarter for purposes of determining the Board-regulated institution's total leverage exposure under § 217.10(c), a Board-regulated institution that is a depository institution holding company or a U.S. intermediate holding company must, and a Board-regulated institution that is a state member bank may, exclude the balance sheet carrying value of the following items: ( 1 ) U.S. Treasury securities; and
( 2 ) Funds on deposit at a Federal Reserve Bank.
( b ) *Opt-in period.* Before applying the relief provided in paragraph (a) of this section, a state member bank must first notify the Board before July 1, 2020.
( c ) *Calculation of relief.* When calculating on-balance sheet assets as of each day of a reporting quarter, the relief provided in paragraph (a) of this section applies from the beginning of the reporting quarter in which the state member bank filed an opt-in notice through the termination date specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) *Termination of exclusions.* This section shall cease to be effective after the reporting period that ends March 31, 2021.
( e ) *Custodial banking organizations.* A custodial banking organization must reduce the amount in § 217.10(c)(2)(x)(A) (to no less than zero) by any amount excluded under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( f ) *Disclosure.* Notwithstanding Table 13 to § 217.173, a Board-regulated institution that is required to make the disclosures pursuant to § 217.173 must exclude the items excluded pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section from Table 13 to § 217.173.
( g ) *Board approval for distributions.* During the calendar quarter beginning on July 1, 2020, and until March 31, 2021, no state member bank that has opted in to the relief provided under paragraph (a) of this section may make a distribution, or create an obligation to make such a distribution, without prior Board approval. When reviewing a request under this paragraph (g), the Board will consider all relevant factors, including whether the distribution would be contrary to the safety and soundness of the state member bank; the nature, purpose, and extent of the request; and the particular circumstances giving rise to the request.
[Reg. Q, 85 FR 32989, June 1, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 738, Jan. 6, 2021]
§ 24.1 Authority, purpose, and OMB control number. ( a ) *Authority.* The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issues this part pursuant to its authority under 12 U.S.C. 24(Eleventh), 93a, and 481.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part implements 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh). It is the OCC's policy to encourage a national bank to make investments described in § 24.3, consistent with safety and soundness. This part provides the standards and procedures that apply to these investments.
( c ) *OMB control number.* The collection of information requirements contained in this part were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 1557-0194.
( d ) A national bank that makes loans or investments that are authorized under both 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) and other provisions of the Federal banking laws may do so under such other provisions without regard to the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) or this part.
( e ) Investments made, or written commitments to make investments made, prior to October 13, 2006, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) and this part, continue to be subject to the statutes and regulations in effect prior to the enactment of the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-351).
[61 FR 49660, Sept. 23, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 70990, Dec. 20, 1999; 68 FR 48775, Aug. 15, 2003; 73 FR 22244, Apr. 24, 2008]
TEN-2015.3.31-10Q Exhibit 10.5






EXHIBIT 10.5




FIRST AMENDMENT TO
TENNECO INC. EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN
WHEREAS, Tenneco Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Tenneco Inc. Excess Benefit Plan (the “Plan”); 
WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2013; and
WHEREAS, it is now desirable to amend the Plan to add a Supplement to the Plan to reflect benefits granted to a newly hired executive in connection with his commencement of employment; 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 6, 2015, by adding the following new Supplement C to the Plan immediately following Supplement B thereof:


“SUPPLEMENT C
TO
TENNECO INC.
EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN


		
	Application
	C-1.  This Supplement C to Tenneco Inc. Excess Benefit Plan shall apply as of January 6, 2015 to the benefits of Participant Brian J. Kesseler (“Kesseler”).


		
	Definitions
	C-2.  Unless the context clearly implies or indicates the contrary, a word, term or phrase used or defined in the Plan is similarly used or defined for purposes of this Supplement C.


		
	Employer Retirement
	C-3.  Kesseler’s benefits under Section 3.2 of the Plan shall be 


		
	Contributions
	calculated in accordance with Section 3.2 of the Plan except as follows: 


		
	(a)
	The Employer Bonus Contributions (as defined in Section 3.2(b) of the Plan) to which Kesseler shall be entitled for any Plan Year shall be calculated in accordance with Section 3.2(b) of the Plan; provided, however, that the Company Retirement Contribution percentage that will be applied to determine the amount of the Employer Bonus Contributions shall be 3%. 


		
	(b)
	The Employer Retirement Contributions (as defined in Section 3.2(c) of the Plan) to which Kesseler shall be entitled for any Plan Year shall be calculated in accordance with Section 3.2(c) of the Plan; provided, however, that the Company Retirement Contribution percentage that will be applied to determine the amount of the Employer Retirement Contributions shall be 3%.


		
	Other Terms of Plan
	C-4.  Except as otherwise provided in this Supplement C the terms and conditions of the Plan shall apply to Kesseler.








    









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the Plan to be amended as set forth herein by its authorized officer, effective as of January 6, 2015.




	
				
	 
	TENNECO INC.
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/Gregg A. Bolt
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Gregg A. Bolt
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Its:
	Senior Vice President,
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Global Human Resources and Administration
§ 202.13 Information for monitoring purposes. ( a ) *Information to be requested.* ( 1 ) A creditor that receives an application for credit primarily for the purchase or refinancing of a dwelling occupied or to be occupied by the applicant as a principal residence, where the extension of credit will be secured by the dwelling, shall request as part of the application the following information regarding the applicant(s): ( i ) Ethnicity, using the categories Hispanic or Latino, and not Hispanic or Latino; and race, using the categories American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White;
( ii ) Sex;
( iii ) Marital status, using the categories married, unmarried, and separated; and
( iv ) Age.
( 2 ) *Dwelling* means a residential structure that contains one to four units, whether or not that structure is attached to real property. The term includes, but is not limited to, an individual condominium or cooperative unit and a mobile or other manufactured home.
( b ) *Obtaining information.* Questions regarding ethnicity, race, sex, marital status, and age may be listed, at the creditor's option, on the application form or on a separate form that refers to the application. The applicant(s) shall be asked but not required to supply the requested information. If the applicant(s) chooses not to provide the information or any part of it, that fact shall be noted on the form. The creditor shall then also note on the form, to the extent possible, the ethnicity, race, and sex of the applicant(s) on the basis of visual observation or surname.
( c ) *Disclosure to applicant(s).* The creditor shall inform the applicant(s) that the information regarding ethnicity, race, sex, marital status, and age is being requested by the federal government for the purpose of monitoring compliance with federal statutes that prohibit creditors from discriminating against applicants on those bases. The creditor shall also inform the applicant(s) that if the applicant(s) chooses not to provide the information, the creditor is required to note the ethnicity, race and sex on the basis of visual observation or surname.
( d ) *Substitute monitoring program.* A monitoring program required by an agency charged with administrative enforcement under section 704 of the Act may be substituted for the requirements contained in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1725-000]


Cross Border Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 2, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Cross Border Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is October 21, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edaba8bfaea28381848388be989d9d829f99ad8b889f8ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbfdfee9f8f4d5d7d2d5dee8cecbcbd4c9cffbdddec9d895dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24494 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2780 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2780

              To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUNSET OF BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENTS ACT.

    The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286 et seq.) is hereby 
repealed 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Treasury shall withdraw the United States from the 
International Monetary Fund, and shall negotiate an agreement on the 
method of settling accounts with the International Monetary Fund.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO THE CONGRESS ON ALTERNATIVES.

    On the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on 
Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on alternative ways of 
addressing the problems that the International Monetary Fund is 
designed to address, including reliance on the operation of private 
capital markets, merging the International Monetary Fund with the 
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and establishing 
an institution to address such problems in a different manner than the 
International Monetary Fund has addressed such problems.
                                 <all>
```