UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

              For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-15675


                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         Delaware                                           52-1462866
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the  registrant  was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X   No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the  registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes __ No X_

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $   73
   Receivables and deposits                                                     109
   Restricted escrows                                                           300
   Other assets                                                                 846
   Investment properties:
       Land                                                  $ 4,650
       Buildings and related personal property                 24,658
                                                               29,308
       Less accumulated depreciation                          (16,748)       12,560
                                                                           $ 13,888
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 599
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           94
   Accrued property taxes                                                       396
   Other liabilities                                                            275
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                 1,734
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    18,717

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                          $ (1,055)
   Limited partners (28,371.75 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (6,872)       (7,927)
                                                                           $ 13,888

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months               Nine Months
                                         Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                          2005         2004          2005        2004

Revenues:
<S>                                     <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
  Rental income                         $ 1,258       $ 1,184      $ 3,620      $ 3,396
  Other income                              127           132          348          384
      Total revenues                      1,385         1,316        3,968        3,780

Expenses:
  Operating                                 787           613        1,952        1,645
  General and administrative                 57            48          159          160
  Depreciation                              292           266          850          807
  Interest                                  372           363        1,106        1,094
  Property taxes                            125           136          396          432
      Total expenses                      1,633         1,426        4,463        4,138

Net loss                                 $ (248)      $ (110)       $ (495)     $ (358)
Net loss allocated to general
  partners (3%)                           $ (8)        $ (3)        $ (15)       $ (11)
Net loss allocated to limited
  partners (97%)                           (240)         (107)        (480)        (347)

                                         $ (248)      $ (110)       $ (495)     $ (358)

Net loss per limited partnership
  unit                                  $ (8.46)      $ (3.77)     $(16.92)     $(12.23)

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                     Limited
                                   Partnership    General      Limited
                                      Units      Partners     Partners       Total

<S>                                 <C>             <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions      28,371.75       $ 1        $28,376      $28,377

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2004                28,371.75     $(1,040)     $(6,392)     $(7,432)


Net loss for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2005                --         (15)        (480)        (495)

Partners' deficit at
   September 30, 2005               28,371.75     $(1,055)     $(6,872)      $(7,927)


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   Nine Months Ended
                                                                     September 30,
                                                                      2005       2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                                <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                         $ (495)      $ (358)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                     850          807
     Casualty loss                                                     12           --
     Amortization of loan costs                                        35           32
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                         (3)         (19)
      Other assets                                                    (96)        (100)
      Accounts payable                                                (12)         (33)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                               6           (6)
      Accrued property taxes                                          158          (23)
      Other liabilities                                               (77)          19
      Due to affiliates                                               113           89
         Net cash provided by operating activities                    491          408

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (1,068)        (352)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                  (73)         (42)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (1,141)        (394)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                 (461)        (421)
  Advances from affiliate                                             981          344
         Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities          520          (77)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                            (130)         (63)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                      203          275
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                          $ 73        $ 212

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 1,088      $ 1,057

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow activity:
  Property improvements and replacements in accounts
    payable                                                        $ 547        $ --

At  December  31,  2004,  approximately  $53,000 of  property  improvements  and
replacements  were  included  in accounts  payable and are  included in property
improvements and replacements at September 30, 2005.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                          DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited consolidated financial statements of Davidson Growth
Plus, L.P. (the  "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial information
and with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB and Item 310(b) of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
In the opinion of Davidson  Growth Plus GP Corporation  (the  "Managing  General
Partner"),  all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the
three and nine month  periods  ended  September  30, 2005,  are not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2005. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004.  The Managing  General
Partner  is  an  affiliate  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and
its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of  all  Partnership
activities.   Affiliates  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  provide  property
management and asset  management  services to the  Partnership.  The Partnership
Agreement  provides  for (i)  payments  to  affiliates  for  services  and  (ii)
reimbursement  of  certain  expenses  incurred  by  affiliates  on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of  the  Partnership's   properties  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$194,000 and $185,000  for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement
of accountable  administrative  expenses amounting to approximately $159,000 and
$114,000 for the nine months ended  September  30, 2005 and 2004,  respectively,
which  is  included  in  general  and  administrative   expense  and  investment
properties.   The  portion  of  these  reimbursements   included  in  investment
properties  for the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2005 and 2004 are fees
related to  construction  management  services  provided by an  affiliate of the
Managing General Partner of approximately $56,000 and $2,000, respectively.  The
fees  are  calculated  based  on a  percentage  of  current  year  additions  to
investment  properties.  As of  September  30,  2005,  the  Partnership  owed an
affiliate  of the Managing  General  Partner  approximately  $256,000 of accrued
accountable  administrative expenses and related interest,  which is included in
due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement provides for the Managing General Partner to receive a
fee for managing the affairs of the Partnership.  The fee is 2% of adjusted cash
from  operations  as  defined  in the  Partnership  Agreement.  Payment  of this
management fee is  subordinated  and is payable only after the  Partnership  has
distributed to the limited  partners  adjusted cash from  operations in any year
equal to 10% of the limited partners adjusted  invested  capital,  as defined in
the  Partnership  Agreement,  or upon the refinance or sale of a property in the
Partnership. No Partnership management fees were accrued or paid during the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2005 and 2004.  Unpaid  subordinated  Partnership
management  fees at September  30, 2005,  are  approximately  $44,000,  which is
included in other liabilities.

During the nine months ended  September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Managing  General
Partner  advanced  approximately  $981,000 and  $344,000,  respectively,  to the
Partnership  to pay real estate  taxes,  accounts  payable and the mortgage debt
obligation for certain of the investment properties.  At September 30, 2005, the
amount of  outstanding  loans and interest was  approximately  $1,478,000 and is
included in due to affiliates on the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet.
Interest on the advances is charged at prime plus 2%, or 8.75% at September  30,
2005. Interest expense on the advances was approximately  $40,000 and $6,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,  respectively.  Subsequent to
September 30, 2005, an affiliate of the Managing  General  Partner  advanced the
Partnership   approximately   $640,000  for  capital   improvements  at  Fairway
Apartments  and real  estate  taxes  and  accounts  payable  at  Brighton  Crest
Apartments.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related  to  workers  compensation,   property  casualty,   general
liability and vehicle  liability.  The Partnership  insures its properties above
the AIMCO limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained by AIMCO from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the Managing  General  Partner.  During the nine months ended
September  30,  2005 and 2004,  the  Partnership  was  charged  by AIMCO and its
affiliates  approximately  $76,000  and  $74,000,  respectively,  for  insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

Note C - Minority Interest in Joint Venture

The  Partnership  owns an 82.5% general  partner  interest in the Sterling Crest
Joint Venture ("Joint Venture") which operates  Brighton Crest  Apartments.  The
Partnership  exercises  control  over the  activities  of the Joint  Venture  in
accordance  with  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement.  The  minority  partner  is an
affiliated  public  partnership.  As a result of the use of the equity method of
accounting  for the minority  partner's  investment in the joint  venture,  that
minority  interest  has been  reduced  to zero.  When the  Joint  Venture  makes
distributions  in excess  of the  minority  partner's  investment  balance,  the
Partnership,  as the  majority  partner,  records a charge equal to the minority
partner's  excess  distribution  over the  investment  balance.  The  charge  is
classified as distributions to minority interest partner in excess of investment
on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Losses are allocated
to the minority partner to the extent they do not create a minority deficit,  in
which case the Partnership  recognizes  100% of the losses in operating  income.
The Partnership will recognize 100% of future net income of the Joint Venture to
the extent of previously unallocated losses and distributions.  Distributions to
the  minority  partner have reduced its  investment  balance to zero.  The Joint
Venture  had a net loss of  approximately  $291,000  and  $160,000  for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,  respectively.  The minority partner's
share of net losses for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2005 and 2004 was
approximately  $51,000  and  $28,000,  respectively.  However,  the  Partnership
recognized  100% of the net loss for both periods due to the minority  partner's
investment  balance being reduced to zero in 2002.  There were no  distributions
from the Joint  Venture to the  minority  partner  during the nine months  ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004. The remaining  unallocated losses and distributions
at September 30, 2005 are approximately $921,000.

Note D - Casualty

In August  2004,  the  Partnership's  investment  property  located in  Brandon,
Florida,  The Village Apartments,  sustained damage from Hurricane Frances.  The
damage was estimated to be  approximately  $64,000 and the Partnership  does not
expect to receive any insurance proceeds. During the nine months ended September
30, 2005, the Partnership  wrote off the net book value of the damaged assets of
approximately  $12,000,  which resulted in a casualty loss. The casualty loss is
included in  operating  expense on the  accompanying  consolidated  statement of
operations.

Note E - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  On June 13, 2003,  the
court granted final approval of the settlement and entered  judgment in both the
Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an
appeal (the "Appeal")  seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order  approving the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a
second appeal  challenging  the court's use of a referee and its order requiring
Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  On June 10, 2005, the California  Supreme Court
denied  Objector's  Petition for Review and the Court of Appeals sent the matter
back to the trial court on June 21,  2005.  The parties  intend to ask the trial
court to make further findings in connection with settlement consistent with the
Court of Appeal's  remand order.  With respect to the related Heller appeal,  on
July 28, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  reversed the trial court's order  striking
the first amended complaint.

On August 18, 2005,  Objector and his counsel filed a motion to  disqualify  the
trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for
cause on October 17, 2005. On or about October 13, 2005 Objector  filed a motion
to  intervene  and on or about  October  19,  2005  filed  both a motion to take
discovery  relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative  representatives
and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.
On October 27, 2005, the Court denied Objector's peremptory challenge and struck
Objector's motion to disqualify for cause. No hearing has been set on Objector's
remaining motions. On November 3, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a writ of
mandate to the Court of Appeals challenging the court's October 27, 2005 order.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and NHP  Management  Company,  both  affiliates  of the
Managing  General  Partner,  are  defendants  in a  lawsuit  alleging  that they
willfully  violated  the Fair Labor  Standards  Act  ("FLSA")  by failing to pay
maintenance  workers  overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week.
The  complaint,  filed in the United States  District  Court for the District of
Columbia,  attempts  to bring a  collective  action  under the FLSA and seeks to
certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
Specifically,  the  plaintiffs  contend  that  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and  NHP
Management Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they
were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  complaint  alleges  AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. In June 2005 the Court conditionally  certified the collective action
on both the on-call and overtime issues,  which allows the plaintiffs to provide
notice of the  collective  action to all  non-exempt  maintenance  workers  from
August 7, 2000 through the present. Those employees will have the opportunity to
opt-in to the collective action,  and AIMCO Properties,  L.P. and NHP Management
Company will have the  opportunity to move to decertify the  collective  action.
Because the court denied  plaintiffs'  motion to certify  state  subclasses,  on
September  26,  2005,  the  plaintiffs  filed  a  class  action  with  the  same
allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County).  Although
the outcome of any  litigation is  uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various  Federal,  state and local laws subject  property owners or operators to
liability for management,  and the costs of removal or  remediation,  of certain
hazardous  substances  present on a property.  Such laws often impose  liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the  hazardous  substances.  The  presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly,  hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected  apartment  communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties.  In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation  actions  brought by government  agencies,  and potential  fines, or
penalties  imposed by such  agencies in  connection  therewith,  the presence of
hazardous  substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs
for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also
impose  liability for the cost of removal,  remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances  through a  licensed  disposal  or  treatment  facility.  Anyone  who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  substances  is  potentially
liable  under such laws.  These laws often impose  liability  whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal  facility.
In connection  with the ownership,  operation and management of its  properties,
the Partnership  could  potentially be liable for  environmental  liabilities or
costs associated with its properties.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits  against owners and managers of multifamily
property  asserting  claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial  monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims  arising from the  presence of mold and for  personal  injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have
implemented a national  policy and  procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its properties  and the Managing  General  Partner  believes that these measures
will  minimize  the  effects  that mold could have on  residents.  To date,  the
Partnership  has not  incurred  any material  costs or  liabilities  relating to
claims of mold exposure or to abate mold  conditions.  Because the law regarding
mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no
assurance  that  liabilities  resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold
will  not have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Partnership's  consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.

SEC Investigation

The  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "SEC")  continues its formal  investigation  relating to certain
matters.  Although  the staff of the SEC is not limited in the areas that it may
investigate,  AIMCO believes the areas of  investigation  have included  AIMCO's
miscalculated   monthly  net  rental  income  figures  in  third  quarter  2003,
forecasted  guidance,  accounts  payable,  rent  concessions,   vendor  rebates,
capitalization  of payroll and certain other costs, tax credit  transactions and
tender offers for limited  partnership  interests.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully.
AIMCO is not able to predict when the investigation will be resolved. AIMCO does
not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of three apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2005       2004

      Brighton Crest Apartments                     90%        87%
         Marietta, Georgia
      The Fairway Apartments                        87%        82%
         Plano, Texas
      The Village Apartments                        94%        92%
         Brandon, Florida

The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at The Fairway
Apartments to a more competitive pricing structure. The Managing General Partner
attributes  the  increase in occupancy at Brighton  Crest  Apartments  to rental
concessions and increased marketing efforts.

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the  ability to attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment  properties,
interest  rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the  investment
properties,  general  economic  conditions  and weather.  As part of the ongoing
business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General  Partner  monitors the
rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility
of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing  occupancy levels and protecting
the Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the Managing
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the Managing  General Partner may use
rental  concessions  and  rental  rate  reductions  to offset  softening  market
conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner
will be able to  sustain  such a plan.  Further,  a number of  factors  that are
outside the control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and
weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the three and nine months ended  September  30,
2005 was approximately $248,000 and $495,000, respectively, compared to net loss
of  approximately  $110,000  and  $358,000  for the three and nine months  ended
September  30,  2004,  respectively.  The increase in net loss for the three and
nine months  ended  September  30, 2005 is due to an increase in total  expenses
partially  offset by an  increase in total  revenues.  Total  revenues  for both
periods  increased  due to an increase in rental  income  partially  offset by a
decrease in other income.  Rental income increased due to increases in occupancy
at all of the Partnership's investment properties and in the average rental rate
at The Village  Apartments and The Fairway Apartments and a decrease in bad debt
expense at all of the investment  properties  partially  offset by a decrease in
the average rental rate at Brighton Crest Apartments. Other income decreased due
to decreases in late charges at The Fairways and Brighton Crest Apartments and a
decrease in lease cancellation fees at The Fairways.

The increase in total  expenses for the three month period ended  September  30,
2005 is due to an increase in operating,  general and  administrative,  interest
and depreciation expense partially offset by a decrease in property tax expense.
The increase in total  expenses for the nine month  period ended  September  30,
2005 is due to an increase in  operating,  depreciation,  and  interest  expense
partially  offset by a decrease  in  property  tax  expense.  Operating  expense
increased  for  both  periods  due  to  increases  in   advertising,   property,
administrative, and maintenance expense. Advertising expense increased due to an
increase  in  referral  fees at Brighton  Crest  Apartments,  and an increase in
periodical costs at The Fairways and Brighton Crest Apartments. Property expense
increased  due to an  increase  in  payroll  and  related  benefits  at all  the
investment  properties.  Administrative  expense increased due to an increase in
temporary  labor  costs  at  Brighton  Crest  Apartments.   Maintenance  expense
increased  due to an increase in contract  labor at The  Fairways  and  Brighton
Crest Apartments.  Depreciation  expense increased for the three and nine months
due to assets being placed into service, primarily at Brighton Crest Apartments.
Property  tax  expense  decreased  due to a decrease in the  assessed  value for
Brighton Crest  Apartments.  Interest  expense  increased for both the three and
nine months ended  September 30, 2005 due to an increase in interest  expense on
advances from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner partially offset by a
decrease  in  interest  expense  on the  mortgages  encumbering  the  investment
properties as a result of payment of regularly scheduled principal payments.

General and administrative expense for the three month period September 30, 2005
increased  due to an increase in audit  related  costs.  Included in general and
administrative  expenses for the nine months ended  September  30, 2005 and 2004
are management  reimbursements  to the Managing General Partner as allowed under
the Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expenses
for  both  periods  are  costs   associated   with  the   quarterly  and  annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the Partnership Agreement.

The  Partnership  owns an 82.5% general  partner  interest in the Sterling Crest
Joint Venture ("Joint Venture") which operates  Brighton Crest  Apartments.  The
Partnership  exercises  control  over the  activities  of the Joint  Venture  in
accordance  with  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement.  The  minority  partner  is an
affiliated  public  partnership.  As a result of the use of the equity method of
accounting  for the minority  partner's  investment in the joint  venture,  that
minority  interest  has been  reduced  to zero.  When the  Joint  Venture  makes
distributions  in excess  of the  minority  partner's  investment  balance,  the
Partnership,  as the  majority  partner,  records a charge equal to the minority
partner's  excess  distribution  over the  investment  balance.  The  charge  is
classified as distributions to minority interest partner in excess of investment
on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Losses are allocated
to the minority partner to the extent they do not create a minority deficit,  in
which case the Partnership  recognizes  100% of the losses in operating  income.
The Partnership will recognize 100% of future net income of the Joint Venture to
the extent of previously unallocated losses and distributions.  Distributions to
the  minority  partner have reduced its  investment  balance to zero.  The Joint
Venture  had a net loss of  approximately  $291,000  and  $160,000  for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,  respectively.  The minority partner's
share of net losses for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2005 and 2004 was
approximately  $51,000  and  $28,000,  respectively.  However,  the  Partnership
recognized  100% of the net loss for both periods due to the minority  partner's
investment  balance being reduced to zero in 2002.  There were no  distributions
from the Joint  Venture to the  minority  partner  during the nine months  ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004. The remaining  unallocated losses and distributions
at September 30, 2005 are approximately $921,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2005,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $73,000 compared to approximately  $212,000 at September 30, 2004.
Cash and cash equivalents  decreased  approximately  $130,000 since December 31,
2004  due to  approximately  $1,141,000  of cash  used in  investing  activities
partially  offset  by  approximately  $491,000  of cash  provided  by  operating
activities and approximately  $520,000 of cash provided by financing activities.
Cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of  property  improvements  and
replacements and net deposits to restricted  escrow  accounts.  Cash provided by
financing  activities  consisted  of advances  from an affiliate of the Managing
General  Partner  partially  offset by principal  payments made on the mortgages
encumbering the Partnership's investment properties. The Partnership invests its
working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the Partnership's properties to adequately maintain the
physical  assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with
Federal,  state,  and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing
General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory
compliance.  For example,  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 mandates or suggests
additional compliance measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and
other areas.  In light of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will
incur higher expenses  related to compliance.  Capital  improvements for each of
the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Brighton Crest Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $540,000 of capital  improvements  at Brighton Crest  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of structural  improvement,  furniture  and fixtures,  and
floor covering and appliance  replacements.  These improvements were funded from
operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement
needs of the property.  While the  Partnership  has no material  commitments for
property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

The Fairway Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $701,000  of  capital  improvements  at The  Fairways  Apartments
arising from the redevelopment of the property which includes  capitalization of
construction  period  interest of  approximately  $3,000,  real estate  taxes of
approximately  $1,000  and  other  construction  period  costs of  approximately
$1,000.  Additional  capital  improvements of approximately  $190,000 during the
nine months ended  September 30, 2005 consisted  primarily of interior  building
improvements,   structural   upgrades,   and  floor   covering   and   appliance
replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash flow and
advances  from an affiliate of the Managing  General  Partner.  The  Partnership
regularly  evaluates the capital  improvement  needs of the property.  In August
2005,  the  Partnership  began a major  redevelopment  project  in order for the
property to become more  competitive  with other  properties in the Dallas area.
Based on current  redevelopment  plans, the Managing General Partner anticipates
the redevelopment to be complete in the first quarter of 2006 at a total cost of
approximately  $2,152,000.  The  project is  expected  to consist of  structural
upgrades,  interior  and  exterior  building  improvements,   balcony  and  deck
upgrades,  partial  roof  replacement,   major  landscaping,  and  parking  area
upgrades.  In August 2005, the Partnership entered into a construction  contract
for  approximately  $1,892,000  related to this  project.  At September 30, 2005
there  were  8  units  down  as a  result  of  the  redevelopment  project.  The
Partnership  expects  to fund the  redevelopment  from  operating  cash flow and
advances from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner. In addition, certain
routine capital  expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2005. Such
capital  expenditures  will depend on the physical  condition of the property as
well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The Village Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $131,000  of  capital  improvements  at The  Village  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of roof replacement,  major landscaping and floor covering
and appliance  replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow. The Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the
property.  While  the  Partnership  has no  material  commitments  for  property
improvements  and  replacements,   certain  routine  capital   expenditures  are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Additional capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from
operations,  Partnership reserves,  and advances from affiliates of the Managing
General  Partner.  To the extent that such  budgeted  capital  improvements  are
completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely
affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  of  the  Partnership's   investment  properties  of  approximately
$18,717,000 is amortized over 20 years and matures  January 1, 2021 and February
1, 2022, at which time the loans are scheduled to be fully amortized.

There were no distributions  during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004. Future cash  distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing of debt
maturities,   refinancings,   and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash
available  for  distribution  is  reviewed on a monthly  basis.  In light of the
amounts  accrued and payable to  affiliates of the Managing  General  Partner at
September 30, 2005, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate
sufficient funds from operations, after required capital improvements, to permit
any  distributions  to its partners  during the  remainder of 2005 or subsequent
periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the managing  general partner interest
in the Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 17,664 limited  partnership
units (the "Units") in the  Partnership  representing  62.19% of the outstanding
Units at September 30, 2005. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to
tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 62.19% of
the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the Partnership.  Although the Managing General
Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the
Managing  General  Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to  AIMCO as its sole
stockholder.  As a  result,  the  duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as
managing general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited partners may come
into  conflict with the duties of the Managing  General  Partner to AIMCO as its
sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States,   which  require  the
Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  The Partnership believes that of
its significant  accounting policies,  the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response  to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes  in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line  basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership  evaluates all
accounts  receivable  from  residents and  establishes  an allowance,  after the
application of security deposits,  for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  On June 13, 2003,  the
court granted final approval of the settlement and entered  judgment in both the
Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an
appeal (the "Appeal")  seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order  approving the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a
second appeal  challenging  the court's use of a referee and its order requiring
Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  On June 10, 2005, the California  Supreme Court
denied  Objector's  Petition for Review and the Court of Appeals sent the matter
back to the trial court on June 21,  2005.  The parties  intend to ask the trial
court to make further findings in connection with settlement consistent with the
Court of Appeal's  remand order.  With respect to the related Heller appeal,  on
July 28, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  reversed the trial court's order  striking
the first amended complaint.

On August 18, 2005,  Objector and his counsel filed a motion to  disqualify  the
trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for
cause on October 17, 2005. On or about October 13, 2005 Objector  filed a motion
to  intervene  and on or about  October  19,  2005  filed  both a motion to take
discovery  relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative  representatives
and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.
On October 27, 2005, the Court denied Objector's peremptory challenge and struck
Objector's motion to disqualify for cause. No hearing has been set on Objector's
remaining motions. On November 3, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a writ of
mandate to the Court of Appeals challenging the court's October 27, 2005 order.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and NHP  Management  Company,  both  affiliates  of the
Managing  General  Partner,  are  defendants  in a  lawsuit  alleging  that they
willfully  violated  the Fair Labor  Standards  Act  ("FLSA")  by failing to pay
maintenance  workers  overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week.
The  complaint,  filed in the United States  District  Court for the District of
Columbia,  attempts  to bring a  collective  action  under the FLSA and seeks to
certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
Specifically,  the  plaintiffs  contend  that  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  and  NHP
Management Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they
were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  complaint  alleges  AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. In June 2005 the Court conditionally  certified the collective action
on both the on-call and overtime issues,  which allows the plaintiffs to provide
notice of the  collective  action to all  non-exempt  maintenance  workers  from
August 7, 2000 through the present. Those employees will have the opportunity to
opt-in to the collective action,  and AIMCO Properties,  L.P. and NHP Management
Company will have the  opportunity to move to decertify the  collective  action.
Because the court denied  plaintiffs'  motion to certify  state  subclasses,  on
September  26,  2005,  the  plaintiffs  filed  a  class  action  with  the  same
allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County).  Although
the outcome of any  litigation is  uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.

ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION

            None.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

            See Exhibit Index.
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.

                                    DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.


                                    By:   DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS GP CORPORATION
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                           Stephen B. Waters
                                           Vice President


                                    Date: November 14, 2005




<PAGE>


                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit


   3              Agreement of Limited  Partnership is incorporated by reference
                  to Exhibit A to the Prospectus of the  Registrant  dated April
                  13, 1986 as filed with the Commission  pursuant to Rule 424(b)
                  under the Act.

   3A             Amendments to the Partnership  Agreement dated August 20, 1986
                  and January 1, 1987 are  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit
                  3A to the  Registrant's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K for the
                  fiscal year ended December 31, 1987.

   4              Certificate  of Limited  Partnership  dated May 20,  1986 is
                  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 4 to the  Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated June 23, 1986.

  10M             Sterling Crest Joint Venture  Agreement  dated June 29, 1987
                  between  Freeman  Income  Real  Estate,   L.P.  and  Freeman
                  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc. is  incorporated  by  reference  to
                  Exhibit  10(c) to the  Registrant's  Report  on Form 8 dated
                  December 29, 1987.

  100             Amended and Restated  Sterling Crest Joint Venture Agreement
                  dated June 29, 1987 among Freeman Income Real Estate,  L.P.,
                  Freeman  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc.  and  the  Registrant,  is
                  incorporated   by   reference   to  Exhibit   10(e)  to  the
                  Registrant's Report on Form 8 dated December 29, 1987.

  10P             Assignment and Indemnity  Agreement dated September 25, 1987
                  among Freeman  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc.,  the Registrant and
                  Freeman Income Real Estate,  L.P. relating to Sterling Crest
                  Apartments,  is  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10(a)
                  to  the  Registrant's  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  dated
                  September 25, 1987.

  10Q             Warranty Deed dated September 30, 1987 between  Sterling Crest
                  Development  Partners,  Ltd., and Sterling Crest Joint Venture
                  is   incorporated   by  reference  to  Exhibit  10(b)  to  the
                  Registrant's  Current  Report on Form 8-K dated  September 25,
                  1987.

  10DD            Multifamily  Note dated  December 15,  2000,  by and between
                  The  Fairways,  L.P., a Delaware  limited  partnership,  and
                  Reilly  Mortgage   Group,   Inc.,  a  District  of  Columbia
                  Corporation,   relating  to  The  Fairways   Apartments   is
                  incorporated   by   reference   to   Exhibit   10DD  of  the
                  Registrant's  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  year
                  ended December 31, 2001.

  10EE            Multifamily  Note  dated  January 8,  2002,  by and  between
                  AIMCO  Village,  L.P., a Delaware  limited  partnership  and
                  ARCS Commercial  Mortgage Co., L.P.  relating to The Village
                  Apartments  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10EE filed
                  with the  Registrant's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
                  year ended December 31, 2002).

  10FF            Multifamily  Note dated  January  14,  2002,  by and between
                  Brighton Crest,  L.P., a South Carolina limited  partnership
                  and ARCS Commercial  Mortgage Co., L.P. relating to Brighton
                  Crest Apartments  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10FF
                  filed with the  Registrant's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB
                  for the year ended December 31, 2002).
<PAGE>
31.1              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1              Certification  of  the  equivalent  of the  Chief  Executive
                  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                  Section  1350,  as Adopted  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  99              Agreement of Limited Partnership for The New Fairways,  L.P.
                  between  Davidson  Growth  Plus GP Limited  Partnership  and
                  Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.

  99A             Agreement  of Limited  Partnership  for Brighton  Crest,  L.P.
                  between Brighton Crest Limited  Partnership and Sterling Crest
                  Joint   Venture   entered  into  on  September   15,  1993  is
                  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 28A of the  Registrant's
                  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended
                  September 30, 1993.

  99B             Agreement  of Limited  Partnership  for  Brighton  Crest GP,
                  L.P.  between  Davidson  Diversified  Properties,  Inc.  and
                  Sterling  Crest Joint Venture  entered into on September 15,
                  1993 is  incorporated  by  reference  to Exhibit  28B of the
                  Registrant's   Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the
                  quarter ended September 30, 1993.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson  Growth
      Plus, L.P.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2005

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior Vice  President  of  Davidson  Growth
                                    Plus GP Corporation, equivalent of the chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson  Growth
      Plus, L.P.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2005

                                  /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                  Stephen B. Waters
                                  Vice President of Davidson Growth
                                  Plus GP Corporation, equivalent of
                                  the chief financial officer of the
                                  Partnership

<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson Growth Plus,
L.P. (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive  officer of
the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  November 14, 2005


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  November 14, 2005


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.