50820 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices 

(c) The quantity and value of U.S. 

commercial shipments of the Domestic 

Like Product produced in your U.S. 

plant(s); and 

(d) The quantity and value of U.S. 

internal consumption/company 

transfers of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s). 

(e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost 

of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, 

(iv) selling, general and administrative 

(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating 

income of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include 

both U.S. and export commercial sales, 

internal consumption, and company 

transfers) for your most recently 

completed fiscal year (identify the date 

on which your fiscal year ends). 

(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a 

trade/business association of U.S. 

importers of the Subject Merchandise 

from the Subject Country(ies), provide 

the following information on your 

firm’s(s’) operations on that product 

during calendar year 2008 (report 

quantity data in pounds, drained 

weight, and value data in U.S. dollars). 

If you are a trade/business association, 

provide the information, on an aggregate 

basis, for the firms which are members 

of your association. 

(a) The quantity and value (landed, 

duty-paid but not including 

antidumping duties) of U.S. imports 

and, if known, an estimate of the 

percentage of total U.S. imports of 

Subject Merchandise from each Subject 

Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) 

imports; 

(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping duties) of 

U.S. commercial shipments of Subject 

Merchandise imported from each 

Subject Country; and 

(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping duties) of 

U.S. internal consumption/company 

transfers of Subject Merchandise 

imported from each Subject Country. 

(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, 

or a trade/business association of 

producers or exporters of the Subject 

Merchandise in the Subject 

Country(ies), provide the following 

information on your firm’s(s’) 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2008 (report quantity data 

in pounds, drained weight, and value 

data in U.S. dollars, landed and dutypaid at the U.S. port but not including 

antidumping duties). If you are a trade/ 

business association, provide the 

information, on an aggregate basis, for 

the firms which are members of your 

association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total production of Subject Merchandise 

in each Subject Country accounted for 

by your firm’s(s’) production; and 

(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to 

produce the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country (i.e., the level of 

production that your establishment(s) 

could reasonably have expected to 

attain during the year, assuming normal 

operating conditions (using equipment 

and machinery in place and ready to 

operate), normal operating levels (hours 

per week/weeks per year), time for 

downtime, maintenance, repair, and 

cleanup, and a typical or representative 

product mix); and 

(c) The quantity and value of your 

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of 

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total 

exports to the United States of Subject 

Merchandise from each Subject Country 

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. 

(12) Identify significant changes, if 

any, in the supply and demand 

conditions or business cycle for the 

Domestic Like Product that have 

occurred in the United States or in the 

market for the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country after 2003, and 

significant changes, if any, that are 

likely to occur within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. Supply conditions to 

consider include technology; 

production methods; development 

efforts; ability to increase production 

(including the shift of production 

facilities used for other products and the 

use, cost, or availability of major inputs 

into production); and factors related to 

the ability to shift supply among 

different national markets (including 

barriers to importation in foreign 

markets or changes in market demand 

abroad). Demand conditions to consider 

include end uses and applications; the 

existence and availability of substitute 

products; and the level of competition 

among the Domestic Like Product 

produced in the United States, Subject 

Merchandise produced in each Subject 

Country, and such merchandise from 

other countries. 

(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like Product 

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree 

with either or both of these definitions, 

please explain why and provide 

alternative definitions. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.61 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: September 25, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–23564 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–658] 

In the Matter of Certain Video Game 

Machines and Related ThreeDimensional Pointing Devices; Notice 

of Commission Decision Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on a Settlement Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 44) granting a joint motion 

to terminate the above-captioned 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–1999. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on September 23, 2008, based on a 

complaint filed by Hillcrest 

Laboratories, Inc. of Rockville, 

Maryland (‘‘Hillcrest’’), alleging 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. **1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices 50821 

certain video game machines and 

related three-dimensional pointing 

devices by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of United States Patent 

Nos. 7,139,983; 7,158,118; 7,262,760; 

and 7,414,611. 73 FR 54854 (September 

23, 2008). The complaint named 

Nintendo Co., Ltd. of Japan and 

Nintendo of America, Inc. of Redmond, 

WA (collectively, ‘‘Nintendo’’) as 

respondents. 

On August 21, 2009, Hillcrest and 

Nintendo jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. On August 31, 2009, the 

Commission investigative attorney 

supported the motion. 

On September 8, 2009, the presiding 

administrative law judge issued the 

subject ID terminating the investigation. 

No petitions for review of this ID were 

filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

Issued: September 28, 2009. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–23665 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

in United States v. Waste Management 

of Wisconsin, Inc., et al. Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) 

Notice is hereby given that on 

September 25, 2009, a proposed Consent 

Decree was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Wisconsin in United States v. 

Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc., 

et al., Case No. 09–cv–0135. The 

Consent Decree between the United 

States, on behalf of the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘U.S. 

EPA’’), and the settling defendant 

relates to certain liabilities under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., 

in connection with the Watertown Tire 

Fire Site in Watertown, Wisconsin (the 

‘‘Site’’). Under the proposed Consent 

Decree, the settling defendant is 

required to pay $3,500 to reimburse 

costs incurred by U.S. EPA in 

connection with the Site. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the Consent 

Decree for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Waste Management of 

Wisconsin, Inc., et al., DJ Ref. No. 90– 

11–3–09429. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney for the Eastern District of 

Wisconsin, 517 E. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 

530, Milwaukee, WI 53202–4580 by 

request to Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Matthew Richmond, and at the U.S. 

EPA Region V, 77 West Jackson Blvd., 

Chicago, IL 60604. During the public 

comment period, the Consent Decree 

may also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $4.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–23748 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Parole Commission 

Public Announcement; Pursuant to the 

Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. 

L. 94–409) [5 U.S.C. 552b]; Meeting 

Notice 

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Tuesday, 

October 6, 2009. 

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth 

Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. 

STATUS: Open. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

following matters have been placed on 

the agenda for the open Parole 

Commission meeting: 

1. Approval of Minutes of July 16, 

2009 Quarterly Business Meeting. 

2. Approval of Final Rule on 

Applying the 1987 DC Board of Parole 

Guidelines to Sellmon cases. 

3. Reports from the Chairman, 

Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and 

Section Administrators. 

AGENCY CONTACT: Thomas W. 

Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 

Parole Commission. (301) 492–5990. 

Dated: September 24, 2009. 

Rockne J. Chickinell, 

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–23593 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–31–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

September 25, 2009. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) 

hereby announces the submission of the 

following public information collection 

requests (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

A copy of each ICR, with applicable 

supporting documentation; including 

among other things a description of the 

likely respondents, proposed frequency 

of response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is 

not a toll-free number)/e-mail: 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the 

Department of Labor—ETA, Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 

202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–5806 

(these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within 

30 days from the date of this publication 

in the Federal Register. In order to 

ensure the appropriate consideration, 

comments should reference the OMB 

Control Number (see below). 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES