alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013263EN.01000901.xml

| 12.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/9

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

2013/C 263/10

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 30 April 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 71170 |
| Decision number | : | 176/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Redningsselskapet |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Royal Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs |
| PO Box 8118 Dep. |
| 0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

30 April 2013

Case number

:

71170

Decision number

:

176/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Redningsselskapet

Type of measure

:

No aid

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Royal Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs

PO Box 8118 Dep.

0032 Oslo

NORWAY

and

| Norsk Tipping AS |
| --- |
| PO Box 4414 Bedriftssenteret |
| 2325 Hamar |
| NORWAY |

Norsk Tipping AS

PO Box 4414 Bedriftssenteret

2325 Hamar

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
EXHIBIT 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


            CORPORATION NAME                 % OWNED      STATE         DATE
                                                         OF INC.    INCORPORATED

DHB Armor Group, Inc.                         100 %        FL         02/04/03
DHB Sports Group Inc.                         100 %        DE         05/02/97
NDL Products Inc.                             100 %        FL         12/16/94
Point Blank Body Armor Inc.                    99 %*        DE        01/27/95
Protective Apparel Corporation of America     100 %        NY         01/09/75
Point Blank International S.A.                100 %      Belgium      03/08/99



*In December  2003,  Point Blank Body Armor Inc.  issued an  approximate  0.0065
equity interest to an unaffiliated third party,thereby reducing DHB's percentage
ownership of Point Blank to 99%.
# C_2006100EN.01000201.xml

| 27.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/2

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

(2006/C 100/02)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: Case 57702

Title: Scheme for research and development concerning gas technologies with improved environmental performance (‘Gassnova’)

Objective: The principal objective of the scheme is to strengthen the intensity of R&D concerning gas-fired power stations with carbon dioxide capture and storage in order to reduce CO2 emissions from such power-stations

2

Legal basis: Decision No 352 to the Storting (2002-2003), Decision No 69 to the Storting (2003-2004), Proposition No 250 to the Storting (2003-2004), decision No 549, Budget resolution No 9 to the Storting (2004-2005) from the Committee for Energy and Environment, Royal decree of 17.12.2004 concerning the establishment and decision on by-laws and authority for the administrative agency Gassnova, and Regulation on amendments to Regulation of 16.12.1977, No 14 and Regulation of 16.12.1977, No 15

Budget/Duration: The aid scheme will be financed through annual dividends of a dedicated fund of NOK 2 billion (approximately EUR 253 million). The annual dividends of the fund constitute NOK 91,8 million (approximately EUR 12 million). The duration of the scheme is ten years

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregister

---
```

                      BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 13, 2006

                             /s/ Josephine Chaus
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Josephine Chaus
                             Chairwoman of the Board and
                             Chief Executive Officer
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Record of decision [electronicresource]: environmental impact statement for the South Hilight Field coallease application WYW174596**
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59:SO 8/3

Item Number:0629-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000817265
 
Report | Appendices 01020304
 
March 3, 2020
# C_2022295EN.01000401.xml

| 2.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/4

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 August 2022

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 August 2022

(2022/C 295/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0233 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4457 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3668 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9717 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8638 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,628 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 401,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7340 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9283 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3475 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4535 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3076 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,0329 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6160 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4087 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 333,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8613 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9105 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 203,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5568 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,734 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,977 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2723 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7635 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,9335 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0233

JPY

Japanese yen

135,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4457

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83700

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3668

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9717

ISK

Iceland króna

138,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8638

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,628

HUF

Hungarian forint

401,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7340

RON

Romanian leu

4,9283

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3475

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4535

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3076

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,0329

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6160

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4087

KRW

South Korean won

1 333,30

ZAR

South African rand

16,8613

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9105

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 203,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5568

PHP

Philippine peso

56,734

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,977

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2723

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7635

INR

Indian rupee

80,9335

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
CONSULTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
This  Consulting  and  Services Agreement (this  "Agreement")  is
entered  into  as  of  June  2,2000 between  eConnect,  a  Nevada
corporation, (the "Company" and Richard Epstein, ("Consultant").
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.  Term. The Company hereby retains Consultant as an independent
consultant,  with the duties particularized in Section  2  hereof
and  subject to other terms and conditions particularized herein,
and  Consultant hereby agrees to act as such for the Company, for
the  period  commencing on the date hereof and  expiring  on  the
completion by Consultant of the Services (as defined in Section 2
hereof).
2.   Duties.  During  the  Term,  Consultant  shall  devote   his
reasonable  best efforts to Performing the Services  (as  defined
hereinbelow)  on behalf of the Company, at such reasonable  times
and  places  as determined by Consultant. The Company understands
and  hereby  expressly  acknowledges  that  the  Services  to  be
provided  to  the  Company by Consultant pursuant  to  the  terms
hereof  shall be on a non- exclusive basis only. As  employed  in
this   Agreement,  Services  shall  mean:  Business   consulting,
acquisitions,  technology  and  overall  marketing  advice   with
specific focus on European and Asian contacts.
3.  Consideration to Consultant for Services. In consideration of
the Services to be rendered by Consultant to the Company pursuant
to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company shall  pay  Consultant  the
issuance of 600,000 S-8 consultant free trading shares,  in  lieu
of cash payment.
4.  Representation of Authority. The Company and Consultant  each
hereby  represents and warrants that has the necessary power  and
authority  to enter into and deliver this Agreement,  to  perform
its  obligations  hereunder  and to  consummate  the  transaction
contemplated  hereby,  and  that  such  actions  have  been  duly
authorized  by, respectively, the Company and the  Consultant  in
accordance with applicable law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed
this  Consulting  and Services Agreement as  of  the  date  first
written above.
"THE COMPANY"

eConnect

Name: /s/ Thomas S. Hughes

Title: Chairman & CEO

"CONSULTANT"
By: /s/ Richard Epstein

Name: Richard Epstein

Address: 2148 Coral Rd.
     Coral Gables, FL
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Christine Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.








Date: May 12, 2011
By:
/s/ M. Christine JacobsM. Christine JacobsChief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Frank E. Mainhart, Respondent, *v.*Edward R. Poerschke, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1900.)

Principal and agent — Unless the minds of the contracting parties meet, the broker cannot recover commissions.

A real estate broker is not entitled to commissions upon an alleged procurement of an exchange of real estate, where the minds of the parties have never met upon the time when the client of the broker should yield possession of his premises to the other party — the actual possession of them being in a tenant, as the broker knew at the time he was negotiating.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New Yolk, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff, upon a trial had before the court without a jury. The action was for broker’s commissions.

Fromme Brothers, for appellant.

Frank E. Hipple, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment under review is sought to be upheld upon the ground that the plaintiff produced one Stern, who was ready and willing to exchange his property, situate in Mount Vernon, in the State of New York, for the defendant’s premises, known as No. 23d West One Hundred and Thirty-sixth street, in the borough of Manhattan, upon the terms named by the latter.

While it is true that, through the plaintiff’s efforts, the parties did agree upon a sum which was to be paid to the defendant for the difference in the equities of the lands to be exchanged, yet the record discloses that the minds of the parties never met with respect to the time when possession of the premises owned by the defendant should be given. This, even according to the testimony offered in behalf of the plaintiff, was still an open question when the parties agreed to meet at the office of the attorney for the defendant upon the following day. When they met it was discovered that the tenant, who then occupied the premises owned by the defendant, refused to waive service of ninety days’ notice to vacate *98the same, in case of a transfer of title, to which notice she was entitled by the terms of her lease. The defendant then refused to enter into a contract, unless Stem would stipulate to take the premises subject to such outstanding lease. The latter declined to do so, and the transaction fell through. The plaintiff knew of the existence of this provision of the lease while he was engaged in his negotiations. Since this was an implied contract for the services of a broker, his right to commissions was dependent upon his bringing the minds of the parties to an agreement (Byrne v. Korn, 25 Misc. Rep. 509), and having failed to do so it is obvious that the rendition of the judgment in his favor was erroneous.

It follows, from these views, that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2804 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2804

To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2003 to ensure the 
inclusion of commonly used pesticides in State source water assessment 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2003 to ensure the 
inclusion of commonly used pesticides in State source water assessment 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS TO ENSURE INCLUSION OF COMMONLY 
              USED PESTICIDES IN STATE SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT 
              PROGRAMS.

    The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to provide supplemental 
appropriations for fiscal year 2003:

                    Environmental Protection Agency

                   state and tribal assistance grants

    For an additional amount for ``State and Tribal Assistance 
Grants'', for grants for the Drinking Water State Revolving Funds under 
section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-12) for 
State expenses of formulating source water assessment programs under 
section 1453 of such Act, $85,000,000, to remain available until 
expended.
    Hereafter, source water assessment programs under section 1453 of 
such Act shall include (1) the assessment of the pesticides 
chlorothalonil, pendimethalin, paraquat, cyanazine, bensulide, 
chlorpyrifos, diazinon, metalaxyl, and mecoprop; (2) the assessment of 
surface water sources; (3) the assessment of residential drinking 
wells; and (4) the assessment of contaminated soil.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1310.12 Anti-evasion provision. ( a ) *Determinations.* In order to avoid evasion of title I of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5311-5374) or this part, the Council, on its own initiative or at the request of the Board of Governors, may require that the financial activities of a company shall be supervised by the Board of Governors and subject to prudential standards if the Council determines that— ( 1 ) Material financial distress related to, or the nature, scope, size, scale, concentration, interconnectedness, or mix of, the financial activities conducted directly or indirectly by a company incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States or any State or the financial activities in the United States of a company incorporated or organized in a country other than the United States would pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States, based on consideration of the factors in— ( i ) § 1310.11(a) if the company is incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States or any State; or
( ii ) § 1310.11(b) if the company is incorporated or organized in a country other than the United States; and
( 2 ) The company is organized or operates in such a manner as to evade the application of title I of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5311-5374) or this part.
( b ) *Vote required.* Any proposed or final determination under paragraph (a) of this section shall— ( 1 ) Be made by the Council and shall not be delegated by the Council; and
( 2 ) Require the vote of not fewer than two-thirds of the voting members of the Council then serving, including the affirmative vote of the Chairperson of the Council.
( c ) *Definition of covered financial activities.* For purposes of this section, the term “financial activities”— ( 1 ) Means activities that are financial in nature (as defined in section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956);
( 2 ) Includes the ownership or control of one or more insured depository institutions; and
( 3 ) Does not include internal financial activities conducted for the company or any affiliate thereof, including internal treasury, investment, and employee benefit functions.
( d ) *Application of other provisions.* Sections 1310.20(a), 1310.20(b), 1310.20(c), 1310.20(e), 1310.21, 1310.22, and 1310.23, and the definitions referred to therein, shall apply to proposed and final determinations of the Council with respect to the financial activities of a company pursuant to this section in the same manner as such sections apply to proposed and final determinations of the Council with respect to nonbank financial companies.
#### Joseph J. Meaney, Appellant, *v.*K. Henry Rosenberg, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1900.)

Attorney and client — The attorney cannot retain counsel to assist him.

An attorney has no right to retain associate counsel and charge his client therefor, unless the latter has assented to such retainer with full knowledge of the facts.

Appeal from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, dismissing the complaint. The action was for legal services.

Greene & Stotesbury, for appellant.

Abraham Levy, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

An attorney’s employment is undoubtedly one of personal trust and confidence requiring his personal services, and he has no implied authority to retain associate counsel or to employ a substitute to act in his place, unless such conduct has been assented to by his client, with full knowledge of the facts. Weeks Attys., § 246. Under the record before us, plaintiff was, therefore, not entitled to recover for the services performed by the witness Brown. While the evidence, is not, perhaps, as satisfactory as it might be, it, nevertheless, appears that plaintiff’s assignor rendered certain services himself, and he was entitled to receive compensation therefor. The dismissal of the complaint was, therefore, improper.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
#### § 1320.16 Extension of time periods.

The Council may extend any time period established in § 1320.12, § 1320.14, or § 1320.15 as the Council determines to be necessary or appropriate.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gelu Voicu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. By:
    /s/ Gelu VoicuName:
    Gelu VoicuTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer I, Thomas E. Gay III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. By:
    /s/ Thomas E. Gay IIIName:
    Thomas E. Gay IIITitle:
    Vice President of Finance
and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
TS- AMID30

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter

– Manufacture and Processing