alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014207EN.01004201.xml

| 3.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/42

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2014/C 207/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 12 March 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74081 |
| Decision number | : | 111/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Region | : | Norðurþing Municipality in north-east Iceland |
| Title | : | Construction of PCC Silicon Metal Plant at Bakki |
| Legal basis | : | Act No 52/2013 which authorises the Minister of Industry and Innovation in Iceland, on behalf of the Treasury, to enter into an Investment Agreement with the company PCC on measures for the construction of a silicon metal plant |
| Objective | : | Regional development |
| Form of aid | : | Direct cash grant for site preparation
  Fixed land lease for 10 years
  Exemptions and discounts from taxes and charges |
| Budget | : | EUR 23,3 million in nominal terms |
| Duration | : | 1 January 2014-27 September 2027 |
| Economic sector | : | Silicon Metal |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Industry and Innovation |
| Skúlagötu 4 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

12 March 2014

Case number

Case number

:

74081

Decision number

Decision number

:

111/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Region

Region

:

Norðurþing Municipality in north-east Iceland

Title

Title

:

Construction of PCC Silicon Metal Plant at Bakki

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Act No 52/2013 which authorises the Minister of Industry and Innovation in Iceland, on behalf of the Treasury, to enter into an Investment Agreement with the company PCC on measures for the construction of a silicon metal plant

Objective

Objective

:

Regional development

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Direct cash grant for site preparation

Fixed land lease for 10 years

Exemptions and discounts from taxes and charges

Budget

Budget

:

EUR 23,3 million in nominal terms

Duration

Duration

:

1 January 2014-27 September 2027

Economic sector

Economic sector

:

Silicon Metal

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Industry and Innovation

Skúlagötu 4

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

and

| Norðurþing Municipality |
| --- |
| Ketilsbraut 7-9 |
| 640 Húsavík |
| ICELAND |

Norðurþing Municipality

Ketilsbraut 7-9

640 Húsavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 19.14 Witness fees and expenses. ( a ) *In general.* A witness, including an expert witness, who testifies at a deposition or hearing will be paid the same fees for attendance and mileage as are paid in the United States district courts in proceedings in which the United States is a party, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and unless otherwise waived.
( b ) *Exception for testimony by a party.* In the case of testimony by a party, no witness fees or mileage need to be paid. The OCC will not be required to pay any fees to, or expenses of, any witness not subpoenaed by the OCC.
( c ) *Timing of payment.* Fees and mileage in accordance with this paragraph (c) must be paid in advance by the party requesting the subpoena, except that fees and mileage need not be tendered in advance where the OCC is the party requesting the subpoena.
IEC-EX10.2_2014.03.27.10Q






Exhibit 10.2




SALARY CONTINUATION AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT 1




THIS SALARY CONTINUATION AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 1 (“Amendment”), effective January 27, 2015, is made to the Salary Continuation and Non-Competition Agreement (“Agreement”) that was effective as of January 29, 2014 between IEC ELECTRONICS CORP. (separately and together with its subsidiaries, “IEC”) and BRETT E. MANCINI (“Executive”).  


A new Section 4.10 is hereby added to the Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:


4.10    Enforcement.  In the event that Executive brings any legal action to enforce any provisions of this Agreement and prevails in any such action, Executive shall be entitled, in addition to any other costs, expenses, damages, awards or other rights to which Executive may be entitled, to reimbursement from IEC of all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by Executive in the course of enforcing this Agreement.


All other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.  Execution of this Amendment by electronic, PDF, facsimile or similar means shall be effective.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first written above.


IEC ELECTRONICS CORP.






By:        /s/ W. Barry Gilbert                /s/ Brett E. Mancini
W. Barry Gilbert                Brett E. Mancini
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
HomeResources...Port Courtesies

# 									Port Courtesies							

Office of the Chief of Protocol

A Courtesy of the Port, or Port Courtesies, is an expedited clearance through customs and immigration at the first port of entry into the United States for Foreign Government Officials and their official entourage members traveling on official business. This program is managed by the Department of State’s Office of the Chief of Protocol in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Diplomatic Security (DS), and Consular Affairs. For more information on the Port Courtesies Program policies and procedures, please review the Port Courtesy Handbook [4 MB]

2017 Diplomatic Note: Foreign Protective Escorts (FPE)

Contact Information:202-647-4074202-997-4923

Email: portcourtesies@state.gov

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1
[10.55]      Promissory Note payable to Oliver Washburn, July 18, 1996

                  [Letterhead of Scientific NRG, Incorporated]

                                PROMISSORY NOTE



$10,000                                                          July 18, 1996

On demand, for value received, Scientific NRG, Incorporated ("Maker") promises
to pay to the order of Oliver Washburn, ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), in
lawful money of the United States of America, at 171 Wildwood Ave., White Bear
Lake, MN 55110, with interest at the rate of 8% per cent per annum.

This note is unsecured.

Should suit be commenced to enforce payment of this note, Maker promises to pay
such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees in
said suit.

Dated at Tustin, CA this 18th day of July, 1996


Scientific NRG Incorporated



By: /s/ Malcolm L. Fickel
    --------------------------------------
Name: Malcolm L. Fickel
Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
# C_2023286EN.01000101.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 286/01)

Last publication

OJ C 278, 7.8.2023

Past publications

OJ C 271, 31.7.2023

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023

OJ C 252, 17.7.2023

OJ C 235, 3.7.2023

OJ C 223, 26.6.2023

OJ C 216, 19.6.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2023204EN.01003101.xml

| 12.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/31

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 204/10)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by San Marino

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: San Marino

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the death of Perugino

Description of the design: The design shows in the centre the Virgin Mary with the Child Jesus, detail of the painting ‘Madonna with Child, Saint Sebastian and Saint John the Baptist’ by Perugino, preserved in the Uffizi Galleries (Florence). At the left-hand side are the inscription ‘PERUGINO’, the dates ‘1523’ and ‘2023’ and the mintmark ‘R’. At the right- hand side is the name of the issuing country ‘SAN MARINO’ and at the bottom right are the initials of the author Maria Angela Cassol, MAC.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 56 000

Date of issue: April 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, I, Burton J. Kunik, Chief Executive officer of Sharps Compliance Corp. (the "Company"), state and attest, to the best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
BURTON J. KUNIK

Dr.
Burton J. Kunik
Chairman of the Board,
and Chief Executive Officer
September 21, 2002

---

QuickLinks
# C_2008180EN.01001901.xml

| 17.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/19

---

Announcement from Norway concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

Announcement of invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf — 20th Licensing Round

(2008/C 180/11)

The Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy hereby announces an invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf in accordance with Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons.

Applications for petroleum production licences shall be submitted to:

| The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
| --- |
| PO Box 8148 Dep. |
| N-0033 Oslo |

The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

PO Box 8148 Dep.

N-0033 Oslo

by 7 November 2008.

The award of petroleum production licences in the 20th Licensing Round on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is planned to take place during spring of 2009.

Further information including detailed maps of available areas may be obtained by visiting www.npd.no/20runde or by contacting the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (tel. (47) 22 24 62 09).

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00191-CV

IN THE MATTER OF S.S.

------------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

Appellant S.S. filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment but 

did not file a brief or respond to our September 26, 2012 written inquiry. We 

therefore abated this appeal and remanded this case to the trial court to determine 

among other things whether Appellant wanted to continue his appeal. On 

November 21, 2012, in the hearing held pursuant to our order, Appellant and his 

mother both testified that they did not wish to appeal the trial court’s judgment, and 

Appellant’s appointed counsel stated on the record that he had filed the notice of 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

appeal in error. The trial court found that Appellant did not wish to pursue an 

appeal. Appellant and the State were both represented by counsel at the hearing.

We hold that this procedure substantially complies with rule 42.1(a)(1) of the rules of 

appellate procedure.2

No decision of this court having been delivered before we received evidence 

of Appellant’s desire to dismiss his appeal, we dismiss this appeal.3

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 31, 2013

 

2See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) (providing for voluntary dismissal of civil case 

on appellant’s motion); Maynard v. State, No. 02-09-00045-CR, 2010 WL 1006295, 

at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 18, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication) (holding same in criminal case regarding corresponding criminal rule of 

appellate procedure 42.2(a)).

3See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
42794.

#### MAVITY v. FIRST OF GEORGIA INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. “The principal place of business of a corporation as fixed by its charter is its legal residence and the only place it can be sued in the absence of the application of special statutory provisions. [Cases cited].” *Singuefield v. General Oglethorpe Hotel Co.,*113 Ga. App. 326, 327 (148 SE2d 92).

2. The provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 56-1201 (3) (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 500), authorizing venue for actions on any “claim or demand” on insurance companies in any county where the company’s “agent or place of doing business was located at the time the cause of action accrued or the contract was made out of which *such*cause of action arose” (emphasis supplied), do not apply to tort actions. “The object of the legislation is to fix the venue of actions against insurers *on their contracts of insurance.”*(Emphasis supplied.) *Dependable Ins. Co. v. Gibbs,*218 Ga. 305, 313 (3) (127 SE2d 454).

3. Tort actions may be brought against any corporation chartered by authority of this State in the county where the cause of action originated only if the corporation has in such county an agent or, if there be none, then an agency or place of business. *Code*§ 22-1102 (Ga. L. 1884-5, p. 99); *Tuggle v. Enter**764*prise Lumber Co.,*123 Ga. 480 (51 SE 433); *Swift & Co. v. Lawson,*95 Ga. App. 35, 43 (1, a) (97 SE2d 168) and cases cited.

*Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Argued May 3, 1967

Decided May 22, 1967.

*Gearinger & Vineyard, H. H. Gearinger,*for appellant.

*Cumming, Nixon, Eve, Waller •& Capers, Samuel C. Wall&r, Frank M. Gleason,*for appellees.

4. “Where lack of jurisdiction appears on the face of the petition, it is proper to take advantage of such defect by demurrer.” *Butler v. Winton,*56 Ga. App. 443, 448 (192 SE 835) and cit.

5. Accordingly, where the petition in this libel action, brought in the Superior Court of Catoosa County, shows that the defendant insurance company’s principal place of business is in Richmond County and that the plaintiff had been an agent of the defendants in Catoosa County at the time the alleged libelous letter was written, but was not their agent at the time the suit was filed, and fails to allege the existence of an agent, or an agency or place of business of the defendants in Catoosa County at the time the action was brought, the jurisdiction and venue of such action was in Richmond County, notwithstanding the service of the defendants by second original. The trial court, therefore, did not err in its judgment sustaining the general demurrer to the petition on the ground of the court’s lack of jurisdiction.

*Judgment affirmed.*
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20

- 0584 CITY OF BILLINGS ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. DANIEL WAYNE BRUSARD ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 12, 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 3 2021

12/03/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0584
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 21

- 00067

- CR

JOHN CHARLES DENELSBECK, III , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Delta County, Texas Trial Court No. 7735

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 ORDER
Our review of the Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains un

- redacted “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(a). Unless a court orders otherwise, “an electronic or paper filing with
the court

. . . must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(b). Sensitive data includes “the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10 (a)(3). The Appellant’s br ief includes the real name s of child victim s mentioned during
trial

. “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or character or by removing the sensi tive data in a manner indicating that the data has been
reda cted.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(d). To protect the identity of the child victim s , we hereby strike the Appellant’s brief and order that it be redacted in accordance with Section 9.10 of the Texas
Ru les of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant ’s properly red acted brief b e refiled on or before January 10, 2022

. IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 6, 2022
# Official Journal C 319/8 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 668 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 319

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 668 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 319/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.63191 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 319/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108179 (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2023/C 319/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108459 | 4 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 319/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.63191 (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 319/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108179 (
  1
  )

1

3

2023/C 319/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108459

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered July 11, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2014-2172 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 03, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

514 17th Street in Moline, Illinois, as the ‘‘David Bybee Post Office 

Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2003

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. 

EMANUEL, Mr. HYDE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. WELLER, Mr. 

COSTELLO, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 514 17th Street in Moline, Illinois, as the 

‘‘David Bybee Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DAVID BYBEE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 514 17th Street in Moline, Illi6 nois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘David Bybee 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2744 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the David Bybee Post Of5 fice Building.

Æ