alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01092-CR

MELVIN RICHARDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1384516

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly 

weapon and sentenced on October 23, 2013, to confinement for two years in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. No timely 

motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was not filed 

until December 4, 2013.
2

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after an 

appealable order is entered when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Although we may grant an extension of time to file 

a notice of appeal, it must be filed in the trial court within fifteen days after the 

deadline for filing the notice of appeal and, within that same fifteen-day period, the 

party must file an extension motion in the appellate court. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 

26.3(a), (b). Otherwise, we do not have authority to grant an extension of time to 

file the notice of appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–4 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996). The notice of appeal was filed within the fifteen-day period, but no 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was filed.

A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is 

essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 

208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of 

appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under 

those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of SETO Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Craig Pian, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,, that to the
knowledge of the undersigned:  3.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: December 14, 2004 /s/ Craig PianCraig PianExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer This certification
accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
# C_2011325EN.01000901.xml

| 10.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/9

---

Action brought on 13 September 2011 by Asker Brygge AS against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-12/11)

2011/C 325/05

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 13 September 2011 by Asker Brygge AS, represented by Thomas Nordby, attorney-at-law and Espen Bakken, attorney-at-law, Arntzen de Besche Advokatfirma AS, Bygdøy allé 2, 0204 Oslo, Norway.

The applicant requests the EFTA Court to:

| 1. | declare void Articles 1 and 2 of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 232/11/COL; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare void Articles 1 and 2 of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 232/11/COL;

| 2. | order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | In its Decision No 232/11/COL of 13 July 2011 on the notification of the sale of land at Nesøyveien 8, gnr. 32 bnr. 17, in the municipality of Asker, the EFTA Surveillance Authority found that the sale constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement and that it shall be subject to recovery. |
| --- | --- |

—

In its Decision No 232/11/COL of 13 July 2011 on the notification of the sale of land at Nesøyveien 8, gnr. 32 bnr. 17, in the municipality of Asker, the EFTA Surveillance Authority found that the sale constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement and that it shall be subject to recovery.

| — | The applicant seeks the annulment of the contested Decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

The applicant seeks the annulment of the contested Decision.

| — | The applicant claims, inter alia, that the EFTA Surveillance Authority:






  — | has misapplied Article 61(1) of the in its assessment of whether Asker Brygge received economic advantage within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

The applicant claims, inter alia, that the EFTA Surveillance Authority:

—

has misapplied Article 61(1) of the in its assessment of whether Asker Brygge received economic advantage within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA,

| — | has erred in its assessment of the relevant time for the basis for calculation of whether State aid was granted within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA, and |
| --- | --- |

—

has erred in its assessment of the relevant time for the basis for calculation of whether State aid was granted within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA, and

| — | has not taken duly into account the fact that the sale is based on an option agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

has not taken duly into account the fact that the sale is based on an option agreement.

---
From: "Hill, Donna B." <DBHILL@southernco.com>

To: Josh Hall/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/14/2009 05:19 PM Subject: Volunteers for Study

Josh, Please find attached the list of volunteers for EPA's collision cell methods development study. I hope this list of facilities meets your needs. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need more information. Please keep us apprised of w hat you are doing and if we can provide any assistance. Thanks, Donna Donna B. Hill Southern Co. Services Research & Environmental Affairs 600 North 18th Street, Bin 14N - 8195 Birmingham, AL 35203 Tel 205 - 257 - 5234 Cel 205 - 587 - 4846 Fax 205 - 257 - 7294 (See attached file: FGD Wastewater Chart - Tentative Facilities for EPA CC Analytical Study of FGD Wastew ater.DOC)
**Exhibit32-1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley A. Galanski, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)            The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)            The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Stanley A. Galanski               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Stanley A. Galanski                   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 1, 2006                        |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The NavigatorsGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Navigators Group, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      3,817,200
<SECURITIES>                                  497,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,405,700
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,418,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          70,100
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,348,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,418,600
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              564,900
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               54,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               505,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           505,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  505,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.84


</TABLE>
State ofUtah 

GARY R. HERBERT 

Governor 

SPENCER J. COX 

Lieutenant Governor 

November 26, 2013 

Department of 

Environmental Quality 

Amanda Smith 

Executive Director 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY 

Bryce C. Bird 

Director 

Carl Daly, Director, Air Program 

US EPA Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-1129 

Dear Mr. Daly: 

~ DEC 23 2013 ~ SP-A 

DAQP-070-13 

On March 21 , 2011 , EPA promulgated new rules under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart LLLLStandards of Performance for New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units and 40 CFR Part 60, 

Subpart MMMM-Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Existing sewage Sludge 

Incineration Units. The Utah Division of Air Quality is hereby notifying EPA Region 8 that there 

are no new or existing sewage sludge incineration units in the state of Utah. Therefore, we will 

not be submitting a Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Plan under 111(d) of the Federal Clean Air 

Act. 

Sincerely, 

-4&<-e-7-LA 

Bryce C. Bird 

Director 

BCB/MB/svw 

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT 

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84 114-4820 

Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801 )536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-44 14 

www.deq.utah.gov 

Printed on 1 00% recycled paper 

f j 

State ofUtah 

Department of 

Environmental Quality 

Amanda Smith 

Executive Director 

GARY R. HERBERT 

Governor 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY 

Bryce C. Bird 

Director 

GREG BELL 

Lieutenant Governor 

March 26, 2013 

Carl Daly, Director, Air Program 

US EPA Region 8 

Mail Code: 8P-AR 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, Colorado 80202-1129 

Dear Mr. Daly: 

DAQP-027-13 

On March 21, 2011, EPA promulgated new rules under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart LLLLStandards of Performance for New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units and 40 CFR Part 60, 

Subpart MMMM-Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Existing Sewage Sludge 

Incineration Units. The Utah Division of Air Quality is hereby notifying EPA Region 8 that there 

are no new or existing sewage sludge incineration units in the state of Utah. Therefore, we will 

not be submitting a Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Plan under 111(d) of the Federal Clean Air 

Act. 

Sincerely, 

-44<-v4-¥ 

Bryce C. Bird 

Director 

BCB/MB/svw 

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT 

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 

Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801)536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 

www.deq.utah. gov 

Printed on I 00% recycled paper 
• • •
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                       69,764
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                443,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,350
<INVENTORY>                                  700,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,347,410
<PP&E>                                     1,718,475
<DEPRECIATION>                               540,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,794,046   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        746,715
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                      11,723
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,412,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,794,046
<SALES>                                    1,882,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,882,093
<CGS>                                        670,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                997,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            33,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              201,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          194,893
<DISCONTINUED>                              (429,753)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                (234,860)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          42,804,000
<SECURITIES>                                    20,318,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,653,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,611,964
<INVENTORY>                                      3,432,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,585,000
<PP&E>                                         262,022,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,718,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,990,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,260,000
<BONDS>                                        175,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         4,523,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,990,000
<SALES>                                        171,809,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,173,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,080,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,448,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,330,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,461,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,869,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.58)





</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) DNA 
Samples: Guidelines for Proposals To Use Samples and Cost Schedule 
[Correction]

    The notice ``National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 
(NHANES) DNA Samples: Guidelines for Proposals to Use Samples and Cost 
Schedule,'' was published in the Federal Register on September 3rd, 
2009, (Vol. 74 FR No. 170). This notice is corrected as follows:
    On page 45647 first column, under Public Availability of Data, the 
Web site should read: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/genetics/genetic_types.htm.
    Proposals for secondary data analyses linking NHANES public use 
data with genetic variation data will be reviewed by the Research Data 
Center see: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/r&d/rdc.htm for proposal 
guidelines.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
James Stephens,
Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-24297 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**617 CAF 15-00409**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF AZALEAYANNA S.G.-B. AND RAJAHALEE D.G.-B.

---------------------------------------------- HERKIMER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; QUANEESHA S.G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

JOHN J. RASPANTE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. JACQUELYN M. ASNOE, HERKIMER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Family Court, Herkimer County (John J. Brennan, J.), entered March 4, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The judgment, among other things, adjudged that the subject children are abandoned children and transferred respondent’s guardianship and custody rights to petitioner. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051).

Entered: July 1, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**GAO-07-928R**                      Published: May 30, 2007. Publicly Released: May 30, 2007.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This letter responds to Congress's May 10, 2007, request that we address questions submitted for the record related to the May 9, 2007, hearing entitled The Future of Air Traffic Control Modernization.

## Full Report

Full Report (15 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Transportation

Air traffic control systemsAir traffic controllersAir transportationCommercial aviationConcept of operationsEnterprise architectureFuture budget projectionsProgram evaluationProgram managementStrategic planningSystems conversionsTransportation planning