alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1240.62 Disclosure requirements. ( a ) An Enterprise must provide timely public disclosures each calendar quarter of the information in the applicable tables in § 1240.63, where for the purpose of these disclosure requirements timely means no later than 10 business days after an Enterprise files its corresponding Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K at the end of a fiscal year or its corresponding Quarterly Report on SEC Form 10-Q at the end of other calendar quarters. If a material change occurs, where for the purpose of these disclosure requirements a material change means a change such that the omission or misstatement of which could change or influence the assessment or decision of a user relying on that information for the purpose of making investment decisions, then an Enterprise must disclose a brief discussion of this change and its likely impact as soon as practicable thereafter, and no later than the end of the next calendar quarter. Qualitative disclosures that have not changed from the prior quarter may be omitted from the next quarterly disclosure but must be disclosed at least annually after the end of the fourth calendar quarter.
( b ) Unless otherwise directed by FHFA, the Enterprise's management may provide all of the disclosures required by §§ 1240.61 through 1240.63 in one place on the Enterprise's public website or may provide the disclosures in more than one public financial report or other regulatory reports, provided that the Enterprise publicly provides a summary table specifically indicating the location(s) of all such disclosures.
( c ) An Enterprise must have a formal disclosure policy approved by the board of directors that addresses its approach for determining the disclosures it makes. The policy must address the associated internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures.
( d ) The Enterprise's board of directors and senior management are responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective internal control structure over the disclosures required by this subpart, and must ensure that appropriate review of the disclosures takes place. The Chief Risk Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Enterprise must attest that the disclosures meet the requirements of this subpart.
( e ) If an Enterprise believes that disclosure of specific commercial or financial information would prejudice seriously its position by making public certain information that is either proprietary or confidential in nature, the Enterprise is not required to disclose these specific items but must disclose more general information about the subject matter of the requirement, together with the fact that, and the reason why, the specific items of information have not been disclosed.
[87 FR 33429, June 2, 2022]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2701

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend to additional military 

retirees with service-connected disabilities the special compensation authority provided for certain retirees with combat-related disabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2003

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend to additional military retirees with service-connected disabilities 

the special compensation authority provided for certain 

retirees with combat-related disabilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE. 

4 The purpose of this Act is to continue the process 

5 of enactment, through an incremental approach, of the 

6 elimination of the requirement, in the case of a retired 

7 member of the uniformed services who has a service-con8 nected disability, of the offset of that member’s military 
2

•HR 2701 IH 

1 retired pay by the amount of disability compensation that 

2 member receives from the Department of Veterans Af3 fairs, with the eventual goal of providing for such a mem4 ber full concurrent receipt of the member’s retired pay and 

5 veterans’ disability compensation. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL COMPENSATION PAYMENT 

7 AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY RETIREES WITH 

8 SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES. 

9 (a) REPEAL OF LIMITATION TO COMBAT-RELATED

10 DISABILITIES.—Section 1413a of title 10, United States 

11 Code, is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘combat-related’’ each place it 

13 appears in subsection (a), (b), (c), and (d); and 

14 (2) in subsection (e)—

15 (A) by striking ‘‘COMBAT-RELATED’’ in 

16 the subsection heading; 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘combat-related’’ in the 

18 matter preceding paragraph (1); and 

19 (C) by striking paragraph (2) and insert20 ing the following: 

21 ‘‘(2) A service-connected disability that is rated 

22 as not less than 50 percent disabling—

23 ‘‘(A) by the Secretary concerned, as of the 

24 date on which the member is retired from the 
3

•HR 2701 IH 

1 uniformed services, under criteria prescribed by 

2 the Secretary of Defense; or 

3 ‘‘(B) by the Secretary of Veterans Af4 fairs.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of 

6 such section is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘§ 1413a. Special compensation for certain disabled 

8 uniformed services retirees ’’. 

9 (2) The item relating to such section in the table of 

10 sections at the beginning of such section is amended to 

11 read as follows:

‘‘1413a. Special compensation for certain disabled uniformed services retirees.’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments of spe14 cial compensation under section 1413a of title 10, United 

15 States Code, as amended by subsection (a), payable for 

16 months beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act.

Æ
# C_2022358EN.01000201.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2022

(2022/C 358/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9954 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7541 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9579 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,497 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 403,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7143 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,1923 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4894 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3226 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,8133 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6717 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4025 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6004 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9787 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5235 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 904,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5141 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,111 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,800 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2279 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0028 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,3605 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9954

JPY

Japanese yen

142,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87400

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7541

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9579

ISK

Iceland króna

138,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,497

HUF

Hungarian forint

403,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7143

RON

Romanian leu

4,9238

TRY

Turkish lira

18,1923

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4894

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3226

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,8133

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6717

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4025

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,58

ZAR

South African rand

17,6004

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9787

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5235

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 904,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5141

PHP

Philippine peso

57,111

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,800

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2279

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0028

INR

Indian rupee

79,3605

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### HOLDEN v. BARRINGER.

No. 31299.

Jan. 18, 1944.

*144 P. 2d 964.*

Sigler & Jackson, of Ardmore, for plaintiff in error.

R. A. Howard, of Ardmore, for defendant in error.

HURST, J.

At his death on July 22, 1941, C. T. Barringer was the owner of a valid judgment against J. C. Holden. On March 31, 1942, Jeanette Barringer moved to revive the judgment in her name, suggesting the death of C. T. Barringer and alleging that as the sole legatee under his will, which had been duly probated, she had succeeded to his interest in the judgment. The court, on the same day, entered an order reviving the judgment in her name. On July 20, 1942, an execution was issued on the judgment. On July 25, 1942, Jeanette Barringer caused the judgment to be assessed for intangible taxes and paid the amount of tax due. On the same day she filed a motion to require Holden to disclose his assets and the court thereupon ordered him to appear and answer questions concerning his property. On July 27, 1942, Holden moved to vacate the order of revivor and to recall the execution on the ground that at the time of the entry of the order and the issuance of the execution the intangible taxes on the judgment were unpaid. When the motion came on to be heard the parties stipulated to the above facts, and the court thereupon entered an order overruling the motion. From such order Holden prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant contends that under 68 O. S. 1941 § 1515 the court was without jurisdiction to enter the order of revivor in the absence of allegation and proof of payment of the intangible tax on said judgment, and that the order was made without jurisdiction and is, therefore, void. But a motion to revive a judgment in the name of an heir is not an “action or suit in any court for the collection” of the judgment, as those terms are used in said statute. It is simply a special statutory proceeding to give life to a judgment which has become dormant upon the death of the judgment creditor. See Shefts v. Oklahoma Co., 192 Okla. 483, 137 P. 2d 589. Such a proceeding is not, therefore, within the purview of section 1515, above.

*412Under this view it is unnecessary to decide whether, as argued by the appellee herein, the subsequent payment of the tax was a good defense to the motion to vacate the order.

GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. CORN, C. J., and DAVISON, J, absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         640,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               858,872
<PP&E>                                      19,607,415
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,646,138)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,820,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,859,173)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,820,149
<SALES>                                        659,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               667,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               322,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             621,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (276,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (276,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (276,908)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.84)


</TABLE>
# C_2014088EN.01001201.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 15 November 2013

in Case E-11/13

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2002/92/EC of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation)

2014/C 88/09

In Case E-11/13, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to correctly implement Article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2, and Article 10 of the Act referred to at point 13b of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations arising under that Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 15 November 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that, by failing to correctly implement Article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2, and Article 10 of the Act referred to at point 13b of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to that Act and pursuant to Article 7 of the EEA Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing to correctly implement Article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2, and Article 10 of the Act referred to at point 13b of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to that Act and pursuant to Article 7 of the EEA Agreement;

| 2. | orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2893 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2893

      To direct the Secretary of Transportation to permit Federal 
    participation in construction projects for the Mackinac Bridge 
                          Authority, Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To direct the Secretary of Transportation to permit Federal 
    participation in construction projects for the Mackinac Bridge 
                          Authority, Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MACKINAC BRIDGE AUTHORITY, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall permit Federal participation 
in construction projects for the Mackinac Bridge Authority, Michigan, 
under section 129 of title 23, United States Code, with regard to the 
limitation contained in section 129(a)(3) of that title.
                                 <all>
```
§ 250.182 Terms defining competitive effects of proposed mergers. Under the Bank Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), a Federal Banking agency receiving a merger application must request the views of the other two banking agencies and the Department of Justice on the competitive factors involved. Standard descriptive terms are used by the Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Comptroller of the Currency. The terms and their definitions are as follows: ( a ) The term *monopoly* means that the proposed transaction must be disapproved in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1828(c)(5)(A).
( b ) The term *substantially adverse* means that the proposed transaction would have anticompetitive effects which preclude approval unless the anticompetitive effects are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served as specified in 12 U.S.C. 1828(c)(5)(B).
( c ) The term *adverse* means that proposed transaction would have anticompetitive effects which would be material to the decision but which would not preclude approval.
( d ) The term *no significant effect* means that the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction, if any, would not be material to the decision.
(12 U.S.C. 1828(c))
[45 FR 45257, July 3, 1980]
# C_2022491EN.01001001.xml

| 23.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 491/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 491/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 December 2022

(2022/C 491/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0633 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88243 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0500 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9852 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 153,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4123 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,215 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 402,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6443 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8993 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,8553 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5804 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4484 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2883 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6918 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4356 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 361,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,2238 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4229 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 525,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7051 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,705 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,849 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5386 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8485 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,0365 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0633

JPY

Japanese yen

140,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88243

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0500

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9852

ISK

Iceland króna

153,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4123

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,215

HUF

Hungarian forint

402,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6443

RON

Romanian leu

4,8993

TRY

Turkish lira

19,8553

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5804

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4484

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2883

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6918

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4356

KRW

South Korean won

1 361,75

ZAR

South African rand

18,2238

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4229

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 525,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7051

PHP

Philippine peso

58,705

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,849

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5386

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8485

INR

Indian rupee

88,0365

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     2,753,500
<SECURITIES>                               1,705,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 14,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,472,500
<PP&E>                                    30,670,300
<DEPRECIATION>                             7,978,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            27,206,900       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,095,900
<BONDS>                                    1,569,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                24,475,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              27,206,900
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,270,800
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,296,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             124,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           199,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,968,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,968,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,968,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.70
        

</TABLE>