alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
  Subsidiaries
    of the Registrant
  State ofSubsidiary

Incorporation593HR, Inc.


TNAllenmore C, LLC


DEAnkeny North MOB, LLC


DEBellaire Medical Plaza SPE, LLC


DEChippenham Medical Offices SPE, LLC


DEDallas County MOB, LLC


DEDes Moines South Medical Building, LLC


DEDurham Medical Office Building, Inc.


TXHealthcare Acquisition of Texas, Inc.


ALHealthcare Realty Services Incorporated


TNHR-Pima, LLC


DEHR Acquisition I Corporation


MDHR Acquisition of Alabama, Inc.


ALHR Acquisition of Pennsylvania, Inc.


PAHR Acquisition of San Antonio, Ltd.


ALHR Acquisition of Virginia Limited Partnership


ALHR Assets, Inc. (inactive)


TXHR Assets, LLC


DEHR Carolinas Holdings, LLC


DEHR Interests, Inc.


TXHR Ladco Holdings, LLC


DEHR of Bonita Bay, Ltd.


ALHR of Carolinas, LLC


DEHR of California, Inc.


ALHR of Iowa, LLC


DEHR of Kingsport, Inc.


ALHR of Las Vegas, Ltd.


ALHR of Los Angeles, Inc.


ALHR of Los Angeles, Ltd.


ALHR of Massachusetts, Inc.


ALHR of San Antonio, Inc.


TXHR of Sarasota, Ltd.


ALHRT Holdings, Inc.


DEHRT of Alabama, Inc.


ALHRT of Delaware, Inc.


DEHRT of Illinois, Inc.


DEHRT of Louisiana, Inc.


LAHRT of Mississippi, Inc.


DEHRT of Roanoke, Inc.


VAHRT of Tennessee, Inc.


TNHRT of Virginia, Inc.


VAHRT Properties of Texas, Ltd.


TX




---



##### 



State ofSubsidiary

IncorporationJohnston-Willis Medical Offices SPE, LLC


DEK-S Building SPE, LLC


DEPasadena Medical Plaza SSJ Ltd.


FLPennsylvania HRT, Inc.


PAProperty Technology Services, Inc.


TNSouthwest General Medical Building (TX) SPE, LLC


DERoseburg Surgery Center, LLC


DEStevens Pavilion, LLC


DEStevens Pavilion Parent, LLC


DEUnico HRT 2005 MOB Venture, LLC


DEUnico HRT 2006 MOB Venture, LLC


DEUnico Medical Properties II, LLC


DEYakima Valley Parent, LLC


DEYakima Valley Subsidiary, LLC


DE
SERVED: July 9, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

Jet Midwest Technik, Inc. 

Docket No. FAA-2015- 0637 

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS 

The parties have filed a joint motion to Stay Proceedings. 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to December 2015. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Proceedings in this matter be and are hereby stayed until December 4, 2015. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 

: l: 

.' . ;~·-~ f ·. ' 
Docket No. FAA-2015-0637 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 lndependence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000 1 

ONE COPY 

Patrick Kraus, President 

Jet Midwest Technik, Inc., Respondent 

9200 NW 11 i 11 Street 

Kansas City, MO 64153 

TEL: 816-399-5096 

FAX: 816-527-8096 

Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Central Region, ACE-7 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway 

Suite 300 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministraNve Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000898904
<NAME>                        AMTRAN INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         129,137
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  57,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,191
<INVENTORY>                                    49,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,208
<PP&E>                                         1,074,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                 412,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,032,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,687
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    80,000
<COMMON>                                       59,012
<OTHER-SE>                                     65,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,032,430
<SALES>                                        1,291,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,291,553
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,288,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,951)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,607)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.28)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                        3,469,909
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,074,110
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        142,561,576
<DEPRECIATION>                46,485,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                101,924,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         66,853
<BONDS>                       152,489,200
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    (50,631,245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  101,924,808
<SALES>                       8,598,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,706,014
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              3,794,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            10,240,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (5,329,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.74)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008297EN.01001101.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/11

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2008/C 297/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 16 July 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number: | 62608 |
| EFTA State: | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary): | Test Centre Mongstad |
| Type of measure: | State's investment |
| Objective: | Environment — Facilitate the development of CO2 capture technology that will contribute to reducing development and operating costs for future full-scale carbon capture |
| Form of aid: | Capital injection |
| Budget: | Net present value of the investment was estimated at NOK 1 480 million (approximately EUR 185 million) in November 2007 |
| Intensity: | Maximum 80 % |
| Duration: | 5 years |
| Economic sectors: | Oil and gas sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority: | Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
| Einar Gerhardsens plass 1 |
| PO Box 8148 Dep. |
| N-0033 Oslo |

Date of adoption of the decision:

Date of adoption of the decision:

16 July 2008

Case number:

Case number:

62608

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Test Centre Mongstad

Type of measure:

Type of measure:

State's investment

Objective:

Objective:

Environment — Facilitate the development of CO2 capture technology that will contribute to reducing development and operating costs for future full-scale carbon capture

2

Form of aid:

Form of aid:

Capital injection

Budget:

Budget:

Net present value of the investment was estimated at NOK 1 480 million (approximately EUR 185 million) in November 2007

Intensity:

Intensity:

Maximum 80 %

Duration:

Duration:

5 years

Economic sectors:

Economic sectors:

Oil and gas sectors

Name and address of the granting authority:

Name and address of the granting authority:

Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

Einar Gerhardsens plass 1

PO Box 8148 Dep.

N-0033 Oslo

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority's website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
§ 229.57 Consumer awareness. ( a ) *General disclosure requirement and content.* Each bank shall provide, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, a brief disclosure to each of its consumer customers that describes— ( 1 ) That a substitute check is the legal equivalent of an original check; and
( 2 ) The consumer recredit rights that apply when a consumer in good faith believes that a substitute check was not properly charged to his or her account.
( b ) *Distribution* — ( 1 ) *Disclosure to consumers who receive paid checks with periodic account statements.* A bank shall provide the disclosure described in paragraph (a) of this section to a consumer customer who receives paid original checks or paid substitute checks with his or her periodic account statement— ( i ) No later than the first regularly scheduled communication with the consumer after October 28, 2004, for each consumer who is a customer of the bank on that date; and
( ii ) At the time the customer relationship is initiated, for each customer relationship established after October 28, 2004.
( 2 ) *Disclosure to consumers who receive substitute checks on an occasional basis* — ( i ) The bank shall provide the disclosure described in paragraph (a) of this section to a consumer customer of the bank who requests an original check or a copy of a check and receives a substitute check. If feasible, the bank shall provide this disclosure at the time of the consumer's request; otherwise, the bank shall provide this disclosure no later than the time at which the bank provides a substitute check in response to the consumer's request.
( ii ) The bank shall provide the disclosure described in paragraph (a) of this section to a consumer customer of the bank who receives a returned substitute check, at the time the bank provides such substitute check.
( 3 ) *Multiple account holders.* A bank need not give separate disclosures to each customer on a jointly held account.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                                                
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,356,360
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11,832,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                       7,500
<INVENTORY>                                    6,001,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19,862,908
<PP&E>                                        15,858,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,191,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                32,766,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20,580,209
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                          20,043
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,140,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  32,766,497
<SALES>                                        9,265,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,265,060
<CGS>                                          7,283,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    421,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               805,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  754,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                      20,171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              734,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                     734,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .031
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .031
        


</TABLE>
§ 238.104 Board action and criteria for review. ( a ) *Board action.* ( 1 ) A subsidiary savings association of a savings and loan holding company may declare a proposed dividend after the end of a 30-day review period commencing on the date of submission to the Federal Reserve System of the complete record on the notice, unless the Board or Reserve Bank disapproves the notice before the end of the period.
( 2 ) A subsidiary savings association of a savings and loan holding company may declare a proposed dividend before the end of the 30-day period if the Board or Reserve Bank notifies the applicant in writing of the Board's or Reserve Bank's intention not to disapprove the notice.
( b ) *Criteria.* The Board or Reserve Bank may disapprove a notice, in whole or in part, if the Board or Reserve Bank makes any of the following determinations. ( 1 ) Following the dividend the subsidiary savings association will be undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized as set forth in applicable regulations under 12 U.S.C. 1831o.
( 2 ) The proposed dividend raises safety or soundness concerns.
( 3 ) The proposed dividend violates a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation, enforcement action, or agreement between the subsidiary savings association or any savings and loan holding company of which it is a subsidiary and an appropriate Federal banking agency, a condition imposed on the subsidiary savings association or any savings and loan holding company of which it is a subsidiary in an application or notice approved by an appropriate Federal banking agency, or any formal or informal enforcement action involving the subsidiary savings association or any savings and loan holding company of which it is a subsidiary. If so, the Board will determine whether it may permit the dividend notwithstanding the prohibition, condition, or enforcement action.
§ 1808.615 Negative covenants of Secondary Borrower. Any additional debt of the Secondary Borrower shall be in accordance with the requirements set forth in the applicable Secondary Loan Requirements and the Secondary Loan agreement, and may include, but shall not be limited to, that: ( a ) The Secondary Borrower will not incur or issue additional long-term or short-term debt payable from and having a lien on all or a portion of the Secondary Loan collateral that is ( 1 ) Equally and ratably secured; or
( 2 ) Superior or senior to the lien thereon of the Secondary Loan as more specifically set forth in the Secondary Loan agreement; and
( b ) So long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Secondary Borrower may, subject to the approval of the Eligible CDFI, incur or issue at any time additional debt payable from and having a lien on all or a portion of the Secondary Loan collateral that is subordinate or junior to the lien thereon of the Secondary Loan and enter into subordinate credit facility agreements, provided that no events of default have occurred and are continuing under the Secondary Loan documents or any parity senior loan documents and that such debt meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

s0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

137898 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137898 

 COA: 284368 

Wayne CC: 00-010334-01-FC 

DENNIS J. LITTLETON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# C_2013347EN.01000701.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/7

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2013/C 347/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 11 September 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74137 |
| Decision number | : | 319/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | NCE Maritime innovation cluster |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid for cluster animation |
| Objective | : | Promotion of innovation |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | Overall budget: NOK 60 million |
| Duration | : | Until July 2016 |
| Economic sectors | : | Maritime |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Innovation Norway |
| PO Box 448 |
| Sentrum, Akersgata 13 |
| 0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

11 September 2013

Case number

:

74137

Decision number

:

319/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

NCE Maritime innovation cluster

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

:

Individual aid for cluster animation

Objective

:

Promotion of innovation

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

:

Overall budget: NOK 60 million

Duration

:

Until July 2016

Economic sectors

:

Maritime

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Innovation Norway

PO Box 448

Sentrum, Akersgata 13

0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
14910-13

-Jl1

7["

-~

loll(

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0676; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-095-AD;

Amendment 3~~~]~2010-*:!:.\1 \ q

R1N 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Learjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

NCURRU;CES

f'><GSYMBOl

-1

~

10

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis

above. This AD requires replacing aluminum fire extinguisher discharge tubes with ne

improved tubes; checking the fire extinguisher container for certain serial numbers;

replacing fire extinguisher containers that have affected serial numbers; inspecting the

pressure indicator on certain fire extinguisher containers for discrepancies; and

performing corrective action if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of

accidental discharge of a fire extinguisher container and damage to an aluminum

-laD

A~h -~

lo/~

OlJl1NC SYM!IO~

1~ITIA••s",ao

discharge tube. Investigation revealed that following the discharge an inaccurate press

indication, due to the indicator dial being incorrJCtly staked, showed that the container L"-"TI,,' ==,-_ IiiliUTINGSYMUOI.

was fully charged. We are issuing this AD to preient inaccurate pressure readings and L,"-m-_~-,-,,---

subsequent damage to the discharge tubes during operation, which could result in failu{e"',,"'" _

of the fire extinguisher system and an uncontained fire in an emergency situation.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference 0 L. _

certain publications listed in the AD as of[INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].