alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. DOLLARA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                      53,404
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               506,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                 10,500
<INVENTORY>                                 180,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,728,716
<PP&E>                                    1,220,605
<DEPRECIATION>                              602,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,696,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       947,699
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     11,329
<OTHER-SE>                                2,957,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,696,197
<SALES>                                   2,482,794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,482,794
<CGS>                                     1,268,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,166,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           79,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (32,467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (6,553)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (25,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (25,914)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00



</TABLE>
# C_2012016EN.01001001.xml

| 19.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/10

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 16/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 19 October 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 70526 |
| Decision number | : | 325/11/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title | : | Authorisation of aid granted to Islandsbanki for the acquisition of Byr and prolongation of the temporary approval of the SLF |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement |
| Objective | : | To remedy a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Duration | : | The aid has been temporarily approved |
| Economic sectors | : | Financial sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| Arnarhvoli |
| Lindargata |
| 150 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

19 October 2011

Case number

:

70526

Decision number

:

325/11/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title

:

Authorisation of aid granted to Islandsbanki for the acquisition of Byr and prolongation of the temporary approval of the SLF

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement

Objective

:

To remedy a serious disturbance in the economy

Duration

:

The aid has been temporarily approved

Economic sectors

:

Financial sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

Arnarhvoli

Lindargata

150 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2826 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2826

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1000 Avenida Sanchez Osorio in Carolina, Puerto Rico, as the ``Roberto 
                 Clemente Walker Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1000 
Avenida Sanchez Osorio in Carolina, Puerto Rico, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Roberto Clemente Walker Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roberto Clemente Walker Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 21.188 “Extended evaluation” status. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purposes of *extended evaluation* status are to: ( 1 ) Identify a veteran for whom a period of *extended evaluation* is needed; and
( 2 ) Assure that necessary services are provided by VA during the extended evaluation. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)
( b ) *Assignment to extended evaluation* status. A veteran's case may be assigned or reassigned to *extended evaluation* status under provisions of § 21.57, § 21.74, § 21.86, § 21.94, or § 21.96. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107)
( c ) *Continuation in extended evaluation* status. A veteran's case will be in *extended evaluation* status during periods in which: ( 1 ) The veteran is pending induction into the facility at which rehabilitation services will be provided;
( 2 ) The veteran is receiving rehabilitation services prescribed in the IEEP (§ 21.86); or
( 3 ) The veteran is on authorized leave of absence during an extended evaluation. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108)
( d ) *Termination of extended evaluation status.* A veteran in *extended evaluation* status will remain in that status until one of the following events occur: ( 1 ) Following notification of necessary arrangements to begin an extended evaluation, the date the extended evaluation begins, and instructions as to the next steps to be taken, the veteran: ( i ) Fails to report and does not respond to followup contact by the case manager;
( ii ) Declines or refuses to enter the program; or
( iii ) Defers induction for a period exceeding 30 days beyond the scheduled date of induction, except where the deferment is due to illness or other sufficient reason;
( 2 ) VA determines the reasonable feasibility of a vocational goal for the veteran before completion of all of the planned evaluation because the decision does not require the further evaluation;
( 3 ) The veteran completes the extended evaluation;
( 4 ) Either the veteran or VA interrupts the extended evaluation;
( 5 ) Either the veteran or VA discontinues the extended evaluation; or
( 6 ) Service-connection for the veteran's service-connected disability is severed by VA or his or her continued eligibility otherwise ceases. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)


Cross References:
See §§ 21.57 Extended evaluation, 21.322 Commencing dates, 21.324 Reduction or termination. [49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 84 FR 193, Jan. 18, 2019]
42248.

#### STAMPS TIRE COMPANY, INC. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY.

Bell,' Presiding Judge.

1. The trial court in this case sustained defendant’s plea in bar to plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff contends that the court erred in considering the plea in bar where the plea was not renewed after plaintiff had materially amended its petition. The two different functions of general demurrer and plea in bar are not analogous. General demurrer challenges the sufficiency of plaintiff’s allegations and must therefore be renewed whenever those allegations are changed by material amendment. See *General Acc. &c. Corp. v. Way,*20 Ga. App. 106 (2) (92 SE 650). The plea in bar alleges additional facts, not in denial of the allegations of the petition, to show that plaintiff is not entitled to any relief in the action in question regardless of the allegations of the petition. Ga. Procedure and Practice §§ 10-1 (p. 236), 10-11 (p. 243). Since the plea does not attack plaintiff’s allegations, there is no reason why it should be renewed whenever plaintiff amends the petition.

2. Having filed this action in Fulton Civil Court and having failed to file a written demand for jury trial in accordance with the terms of Sec. 39 of an Act of 1913 (Ga. L. 1913, pp. 145, 165) as amended by Sec. 4 of an Act of 1935 (Ga. L. 1935, pp. 500, 502), the plaintiff must be held to have waived a trial by jury. *Owen v. Stevenson,*18 Ga. App. 391 (89 SE 435); *Cherry v. McCutcheon,*68 Ga. App. 682, 690 (23 SE2d 587). The court did not err in refusing to commit trial of the plea in bar to a jury.

3. Defendant’s plea in bar raises issues of fact, and the record on appeal contains no information as to what, if any, evidence or admissions or stipulations of fact were heard by the trial court before sustaining the plea. Under these circumstances it must be presumed that the trial judge had before him ample evidence or admissions to authorize the judgment rendered.

*327*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Argued September 6, 1966

Decided February 9, 1967

Rehearing denied March 1, 1967.

*Miles B. Sams,*for appellant.

*Best, Chambers & Mabry, Eugene P. Chambers, Jr.,*for appellee.

4. This case having been finally terminated by the judgment sustaining defendant’s plea in bar and dismissing the petition, subsequent rulings of the trial court also purporting to dismiss the petition are mere nullities and do not permit discussion. *Waldor v. Waldor,*217 Ga. 496 (1) (123 SE2d 660).

*Judgment affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, being the ChiefFinancial Officer of ProLogis (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), which accompanies thiscertification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: February 27, 2007 By:  /s/ DESSA M. BOKIDES    Name:  Dessa M. Bokides    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
§ 22.8 Determination fees. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129), any national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on behalf of the national bank or Federal savings association, may charge a reasonable fee for determining whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special flood hazard area. A determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-loan monitoring.
( b ) *Borrower fee.* The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may be charged to the borrower if the determination: ( 1 ) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan that is initiated by the borrower;
( 2 ) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA's revision or updating of flood plain areas or flood-risk zones;
( 3 ) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA's publication of a notice or compendium that: ( i ) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or
( ii ) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area; or
( 4 ) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender, or its servicer, on behalf of the borrower under § 22.7.
( c ) *Purchaser or transferee fee.* The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer of the loan.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Lamar Advertising Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-10337) on Form S-8 of Lamar Advertising Company of our report dated January
20, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lamar Advertising
Company and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1995 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 1996,
which report appears in the October 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of
Lamar Advertising Company.


                                        /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
January 27, 1997
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20682

Summary Calendar

 

CHARLES B. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-3959

___________________________________________

March 9, 2000

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court erred in dismissing Charles B. Williams’ (Texas prisoner #

554523) 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. The Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals dismissed Williams’ second state postconviction application on October 1,

1997, not on April 9, 1997, as found by the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the

judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
2

VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### § 1808.104 Deviations.

To the extent that such requirements are not specified by statute, the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget, may authorize deviations on an individual or general basis from the requirements of this interim rule upon a finding that such deviation is essential to program objectives, and the special circumstances stated in the proposal make such deviation clearly in the best interest of the Federal Government. All proposals must be in writing and supported by a statement of the facts and the grounds forming the basis of the deviation. For deviations of general applicability, after a determination is made by the Secretary of the Treasury based on the deviation proposal, the CDFI Fund must publish notification of granted deviations in the Federal Register. Any deviation that was not captured in the original credit subsidy cost estimate will require either additional fees, or discretionary appropriations to cover the cost.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection
with the Annual Report of Acadia Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth F. Bernstein,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                        | 
| | -------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Kenneth
 F. Bernstein              | 
| |                                        | 
| | Kenneth F.
 Bernstein                  | 
| | President
 and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | March 1,
 2010                         | 

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
San Diego, CA



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 
26, 1999 relating to the financial statements of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, 
Inc., incorporated by reference into the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K 
for the year ended December 31, 1998, into the prospectuses constituting a part 
of the following registration statements: No. 333-18725 on Form S-8 to Form S-4,
No. 333-18725 on Form S-3 to Form S-4, No. 333-56155 on Form S-3, No. 333-56157 
on Form S-3, and No. 333-69727 on Form S-3.

We also consent to the references to us under the caption "Experts" in the 
Prospectuses.




                                                 BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                 New York, NY


March 30, 1998
Exhibit 11

                            QUAD SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                               PER SHARE EARNINGS

               (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                      -----------------------------------------------
                                                         1997             1996              1995
                                                         ----             ----              ----

<S>                                                    <C>               <C>                <C>      
PRIMARY
Average shares outstanding                             4,286,556         4,221,888          4,130,482

Net effect of dilutive options
      based on the treasury method                       177,154            97,432            195,971

Net effect of dilutive stock purchase plan
     shares based on the treasury method                     103             1,857              2,521
                                                       ---------         ---------          ---------
Total                                                  4,463,813         4,321,177          4,328,974
                                                       =========         =========          =========
Net income                                                $1,987            $1,492             $2,688
                                                       =========         =========          =========
Net income per share                                       $0.45             $0.35              $0.62
                                                       =========         =========          =========
</TABLE>

The calculation of fully diluted earnings per share is the same as the
calculation of primary earnings per share.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Sep-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     Sep-25-1995
<PERIOD-END>                       Sep-29-1996
<CASH>                                   2,636
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           15,076
<ALLOWANCES>                               633
<INVENTORY>                             16,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        37,299
<PP&E>                                   2,487
<DEPRECIATION>                           4,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          43,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   13,982
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   128
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            28,091
<SALES>                                 71,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        71,591
<CGS>                                   43,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           43,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        23,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,407
<INCOME-TAX>                               915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,889
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .35
        

</TABLE>