alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020023EN.01001001.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/10

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Complaints Board for Public Procurement dated 18 October 2019 in the case of Scanteam AS v the Norwegian Government

(Case E-8/19)

(2020/C 23/10)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 18 October 2019 from the Complaints Board for Public Procurement (Klagenemnda for offentlige anskaffelser), which was received at the Court Registry on 18 October 2019, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Scanteam AS v the Norwegian Government, on the following question:

Is Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement applicable to procurement procedures undertaken by a foreign mission of an EFTA State in a third country (outside the EEA)?

---
# C_2023279EN.01000601.xml

| 8.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 August 2023

(2023/C 279/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0984 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4515 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86163 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9625 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,1485 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,224 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 389,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4138 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,6575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6715 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4688 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5744 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8004 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4730 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,4371 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8976 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 688,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0076 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,654 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,246 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3609 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7490 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,8738 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0984

JPY

Japanese yen

156,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4515

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86163

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6625

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9625

ISK

Iceland króna

145,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,1485

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,224

HUF

Hungarian forint

389,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4138

RON

Romanian leu

4,9490

TRY

Turkish lira

29,6575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6715

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4688

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5744

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8004

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4730

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,38

ZAR

South African rand

20,4371

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8976

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 688,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0076

PHP

Philippine peso

61,654

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,246

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3609

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7490

INR

Indian rupee

90,8738

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 238.96 General exemption. ( a ) *Exemption.* The Board may by agency order exempt an interlock from the prohibitions in § 238.93 if the Board finds that the interlock would not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition and would not present safety and soundness concerns. A depository organization may apply to the Board for an exemption.
( b ) *Presumptions.* In reviewing an application for an exemption under this section, the Board will apply a rebuttable presumption that an interlock will not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition if the depository organization seeking to add a management official: ( 1 ) Primarily serves low- and moderate-income areas;
( 2 ) Is controlled or managed by persons who are members of a minority group, or women;
( 3 ) Is a depository institution that has been chartered for less than two years; or
( 4 ) Is deemed to be in “troubled condition” as defined in § 238.72.
( c ) *Duration.* Unless a shorter expiration period is provided in the Board approval, an exemption permitted by paragraph (a) of this section may continue so long as it does not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition, or is unsafe or unsound. If the Board grants an interlock exemption in reliance upon a presumption under paragraph (b) of this section, the interlock may continue for three years, unless otherwise provided by the Board in writing.
EX 10.2 First Amendment to Rocket Travel 2012 Stock Incentive Plan




Exhibit 10.2


ROCKET TRAVEL, INC.


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


Rocket Travel, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) has on the date set forth below adopted this First Amendment to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan of the Corporation (the “Plan”). 
    
1.    Sections 3(a) and 3(b) of the Plan are amended in their entirety to read:


“3.    Stock Available for Awards
a.    Number of Shares.  Subject to adjustment under Section 3(c), the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan is 524,321 shares.  If any Award expires unexercised or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, the unissued Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan.  If shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the Plan are repurchased by, or are surrendered or forfeited to, the Company at no more than cost, such shares of Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the cumulative number of shares that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 524,321 shares.  Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.
b.    Per-Participant Limit.  Subject to adjustment under Section 3(c), no Participant may be granted Awards during any one fiscal year to purchase more than 524,321 shares of Common Stock.”


I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on November 21, 2013 and approved by the shareholders of the Corporation on November 21, 2013.






                                                        ______________________________
                                                      Harry A. Hanson, III, Secretary
# L_2006332EN.01003401.xml

| 30.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/34

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES

No 1/2004/SC

of 5 February 2004

establishing an Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Enlargement Agreement,

Having regard to Protocol 38a on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the EEA Enlargement Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Community on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2004-2009,

Having regard to Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2003/SC of 4 December 2003 establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   An Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism 2004-2009 and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism is hereby established.

2.   The Office shall assist in the management of the EEA Financial Mechanism and of the Norwegian Financial Mechanism.

3.   The Office shall also assist in the management of the EEA Financial Instrument 1999-2003 as well as the Financial Mechanism 1994-1998.

4.   The present Financial Instrument Unit in the EFTA Secretariat shall be integrated into the new Office. Regarding the EEA Financial Mechanism, the Office shall report to the EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee until the entering into force of the EEA Enlargement Agreement, and thereafter to the new EEA Financial Mechanism Committee.

5.   Regarding the Norwegian Financial Mechanism, the Office shall report to the Norwegian authorities.

6.   The Office shall administratively be part of the EFTA Secretariat. The Office will have a separate administrative budget, financed by the funds on a ratio based on their respective costs.

7.   The Director of the Office shall be appointed by the Standing Committee upon nomination by the EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee.

Article 2

This Decision shall take immediate effect.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2004.

For the Standing Committee

The Chairman

H.S.H. Prince Nikolaus of LIECHTENSTEIN

The Secretary-General

William ROSSIER

---
§ 211.20 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) under the authority of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (BHC Act) (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*) and the International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA) (12 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*).
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart is in furtherance of the purposes of the BHC Act and the IBA. It applies to foreign banks and foreign banking organizations with respect to: ( 1 ) The limitations on interstate banking under section 5 of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3103);
( 2 ) The exemptions from the nonbanking prohibitions of the BHC Act and the IBA afforded by sections 2(h) and 4(c)(9) of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(h), 1843(c)(9));
( 3 ) Board approval of the establishment of an office of a foreign bank in the United States under sections 7(d) and 10(a) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(d), 3107(a));
( 4 ) The termination by the Board of a foreign bank's representative office, state branch, state agency, or commercial lending company subsidiary under sections 7(e) and 10(b) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(e), 3107(b)), and the transmission of a recommendation to the Comptroller to terminate a federal branch or federal agency under section 7(e)(5) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(e)(5));
( 5 ) The examination of an office or affiliate of a foreign bank in the United States as provided in sections 7(c) and 10(c) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(c), 3107(c));
( 6 ) The disclosure of supervisory information to a foreign supervisor under section 15 of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3109);
( 7 ) The limitations on loans to one borrower by state branches and state agencies of a foreign bank under section 7(h)(2) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(h)(2));
( 8 ) The limitation of a state branch and a state agency to conducting only activities that are permissible for a federal branch under section (7)(h)(1) of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3105(h)(1)); and
( 9 ) The deposit insurance requirement for retail deposit taking by a foreign bank under section 6 of the IBA (12 U.S.C. 3104).
( 10 ) The management of shell branches (12 U.S.C. 3105(k)).
( c ) *Additional requirements.* Compliance by a foreign bank with the requirements of this subpart and the laws administered and enforced by the Board does not relieve the foreign bank of responsibility to comply with the laws and regulations administered by the licensing authority.
§ 252.15 Methodologies and practices. ( a ) *Potential impact on capital.* In conducting a stress test under § 252.14, for each quarter of the planning horizon, a state member bank must estimate the following for each scenario required to be used: ( 1 ) Losses, pre-provision net revenue, provision for credit losses, and net income; and
( 2 ) The potential impact on the regulatory capital levels and ratios applicable to the covered bank, and any other capital ratios specified by the Board, incorporating the effects of any capital action over the planning horizon and maintenance of an allowance for loan losses or adjusted allowance for credit losses, as appropriate, for credit exposures throughout the planning horizon.
( b ) *Controls and oversight of stress testing processes* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The senior management of a state member bank must establish and maintain a system of controls, oversight, and documentation, including policies and procedures, that are designed to ensure that its stress testing processes are effective in meeting the requirements in this subpart. These policies and procedures must, at a minimum, describe the company's stress testing practices and methodologies, and processes for validating and updating the company's stress test practices and methodologies consistent with applicable laws and regulations.
( 2 ) *Oversight of stress testing processes.* The board of directors, or a committee thereof, of a state member bank must review and approve the policies and procedures of the stress testing processes as frequently as economic conditions or the condition of the company may warrant, but no less than each year that a stress test is conducted. The board of directors and senior management of the state member bank must receive a summary of the results of the stress test conducted under this section.
( 3 ) *Role of stress testing results.* The board of directors and senior management of a state member bank must consider the results of the stress test in the normal course of business, including but not limited to, the state member bank's capital planning, assessment of capital adequacy, and risk management practices.
[Reg. YY, 79 FR 64045, Oct. 27, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 75425, Dec. 2, 2015; 84 FR 4245, Feb. 14, 2019; 84 FR 59101, Nov. 1, 2019]
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2780

To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL

To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUNSET OF BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENTS 

4 ACT. 

5 The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286 

6 et seq.) is hereby repealed 3 years after the date of enact7 ment of this Act. 

8 SEC. 2. SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS. 

9 Not later than 3 years after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall with11 draw the United States from the International Monetary 

12 Fund, and shall negotiate an agreement on the method 
2

•HR 2780 IH 

1 of settling accounts with the International Monetary 

2 Fund. 

3 SEC. 3. REPORT TO THE CONGRESS ON ALTERNATIVES. 

4 On the date that is 2 years after the date of the en5 actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 

6 submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the 

7 House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign 

8 Relations of the Senate a report on alternative ways of 

9 addressing the problems that the International Monetary 

10 Fund is designed to address, including reliance on the op11 eration of private capital markets, merging the Inter12 national Monetary Fund with the International Bank for 

13 Reconstruction and Development, and establishing an in14 stitution to address such problems in a different manner 

15 than the International Monetary Fund has addressed such 

16 problems.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal
Management, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2005
(the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice
President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



 /s/ Daniel W. Dienst
------------------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
November 2, 2005

 /s/ Robert C. Larry
------------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
November 2, 2005

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 268.205 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Craig Pian, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SETO
Holdings, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on
for 10-QSB of SETO Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respects to
the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;  a.
    
    designed such disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of
the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); andc.
    
    presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
Registrants board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions):  d.
    
    all significant deficiencies in
the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrants auditors and
material weaknesses in internal controls; ande.
    
    any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal controls; and  6.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: September 13, 2004/s/ Craig PianCraig Pian
**GAO-07-918R**                      Published: May 29, 2007. Publicly Released: May 29, 2007.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This letter responds to Congress's April 24, 2007, request that GAO address questions submitted for the record by Members of the Subcommittee related to the March 29, 2007, hearing entitled JPDO and the Next Generation Air Transportation System: Status and Issues.

## Full Report

Full Report (10 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Transportation

Air traffic control systemsAir traffic controllersAir transportationCommercial aviationConcept of operationsEnterprise architectureFuture budget projectionsProgram evaluationProgram managementStrategic planningSystems conversionsTransportation planning