alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices 

# Order

September 19, 2014

149020

- 2

In re ROSA LOUISE PARKS TRUST.

_________________________________________

ROSA AND RAYMOND PARKS INSTITUTE

FOR SELF

- DEVELOPMENT and ELAINE

STEELE,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v SC: 149020

COA: 310948

Wayne PC: 2006

- 707697

- TV

JOHN M. CHASE, JR. and MELVIN D.

JEFFERSON,

Respondents

- Appellees,

and

FREDDIE G. BURTON, JR.,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

In re ROSA LOUISE PARKS TRUST.

_________________________________________

ROSA AND RAYMOND PARKS INSTITUTE

FOR SELF

- DEVELOPMENT and ELAINE

STEELE,

Appellants,

v SC: 149021

COA: 311647

Wayne PC: 2006

- 707697

- TV

JOHN M. CHASE, JR. and MELVIN D.

JEFFERSON,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 19, 2014

d0916 2

Clerk In re ROSA LOUISE PARKS TRUST.

_________________________________________

JOHN M. CHASE, JR. and MELVIN D.

JEFFERSON,

Appellees,

v SC: 149022

COA: 312822

Wayne PC: 2006

- 707697

- TV

ROSA AND RAYMOND PARKS INSTITUTE

FOR SELF

- DEVELOPMENT and ELAINE

STEELE,

Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justi ce, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
#### Louis C. Raegener, as Receiver, Etc., Plaintiff, *v.*Morris A. Tynberg et al., Defendants.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

October, 1900.)

1. Bills and notes — Demand capital stock note, payable on a contingency — Statute of Limitations.

A demand capital stock note delivered to a mutual fire insurance company, upon its incorporation, pursuant to a statute requiring the note to remain as security for all losses and claims of the company until the accumulation of profits invested as required by law should equal the amount of capital required to be possessed by stock fire insurance corporations, is not due at once, is payable upon a contingency, and the Statute of Limitations begins to run against it only from the time when an assessment was levied upon it.

2. Same — Agent’s right to receive payment.

An agent of the company, with power to issue policies and receive premiums therefor, has no implied authority to receive payment of such a note where it was never intrusted to his power or control; nor can he, in any event, collect it before it becomes due.

*659Action on capital stock note made by defendants. Motion by defendants for new trial on minutes after direction of a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

Wallack *&*Cook, for plaintiff.

James, Schell & Elkus, for defendants.

McAdam, J.

The capital stock note sued on was made by the defendants and delivered to the Equitable Mutual Fire Insurance corporation on its incorporation, agreeably to the direction of the statute that it “ Shall remain as security for all losses and claims until the accumulation of profits invested as required by law shall equal the amount of the capital required to be possessed by stock fire insurance corporations,” etc. 2 R. S. (Banks’ 9th ed.) 1178, § 113. It was not the ordinary demand note, but one payable upon a contingency which happened when the plaintiff, as receiver, levied an assessment upon the note, and the Statute of limitations commenced to run only from that time, so that its operation .never affected the obligation. Raegener v. Medicus, 32 Misc. Rep. 591. As to the alleged payment of the note there are two legal objections: (1) There was no proof of express authority on the part of Ward Phillips to receive payment thereof, and the fact that he had power to issue policies and receive premiums thereon does not carry with it implied authority to receive payment of a capital stock note given under the statutory provision before referred to, when said note was never intrusted to his possession or control. Smith v. Kidd, 68 N. Y. 130; Crane v. Gruenewald, 120 id. 274; Central Trust Co. v. Folsom, 26 App. Div. 40; Frank v. Tuozzo, id. 447. (2) An agent has no implied authority to collect a note or bond before it becomes due. Story Agency (7th ed.), § 98; Smith v. Kidd, *supra;*Fellows v. Northrup, 39 N. Y. 121; Doubleday v. Kress, 50 id. 410. The direction to find for the plaintiff was right, and the motion for a new trial must be denied, without costs.

Motion denied, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, George Feldenkreis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Perry Ellis International, Inc.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ GEORGE FELDENKREIS 
|Name:  |  | George Feldenkreis     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Perry Ellis International, Inc. and will be retained by Perry Ellis International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Section 8 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973f, I hereby certify that in my judgment the appointment of federal observers is necessary to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States in the Bethel Census Area, Alaska. This area is included within the scope of the determinations of the Attorney General and the Director of the Census made under Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973b(b), and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 22, 1975 (40 FR 49,422).                

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Eric H. Holder Jr.,

Attorney General of the United States. 

[FR Doc. E9-24109 Filed 10-2-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-13-P
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.301 Definitions. ( a ) Except as modified in this subpart, or unless the context otherwise requires, the terms used in this subpart have the same meanings as set forth in 12 U.S.C. 1813.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply. ( 1 ) *Banking organization* means a U.S. bank holding company; U.S. savings and loan holding company; state member bank; the U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations; and an Edge or agreement corporation; provided, however, that no designated financial market utility shall be considered a banking organization.
( 2 ) *Bank service provider* means a bank service company or other person that performs covered services; provided, however, that no designated financial market utility shall be considered a bank service provider.
( 3 ) *Business line* means a product or service offered by a banking organization to serve its customers or support other business needs.
( 4 ) *Computer-security incident* is an occurrence that results in actual harm to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or the information that the system processes, stores, or transmits.
( 5 ) *Covered services* are services performed, by a person, that are subject to the Bank Service Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1861-1867).
( 6 ) *Designated financial market utility* has the same meaning as set forth at 12 U.S.C. 5462(4).
( 7 ) *Notification incident* is a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, a banking organization's— ( i ) Ability to carry out banking operations, activities, or processes, or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, in the ordinary course of business;
( ii ) Business line(s), including associated operations, services, functions, and support, that upon failure would result in a material loss of revenue, profit, or franchise value; or
( iii ) Operations, including associated services, functions and support, as applicable, the failure or discontinuance of which would pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States.
( 8 ) *Person* has the same meaning as set forth at 12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(8)(A).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 13, 2003


                                       /s/ Barton Heminover
                                     --------------------------------
                                       Barton Heminover
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1203.22 Reply to the response.

Within 15 days after service of a response, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the underlying adversary adjudication, the applicant must include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 1203.25.
---

ELEPHANT & CASTLE GROUP INC.

EXHIBITS TO 10-K FILE NO. 1-12134

EXHIBIT 21 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

**Subsidiary**
    Jurisdiction of
      Incorporation
    Date of
      IncorporationElephant & Castle Group,
      Inc.
    British Columbia
    December 14, 1992The Elephant and Castle Canada Inc.
    Ontario
    May 1, 1990Elephant & Castle, Inc.
    Texas
    August 26, 1983Elephant & Castle, Inc.
    Washington
    September 6, 1989Elephant and Castle of Pennsylvania, Inc.
    Pennsylvania
    January 24, 1994E & C Pub, Inc.
    California
    October 24, 1995Massachusetts Elephant & Castle Group,
      Inc.
    Massachusetts
    April 25, 1997Elephant & Castle International, Inc.
    Texas
    September 4, 1997Elephant & Castle (Chicago) Corporation
    Nevada
    January 29, 2002Elephant & Castle East Huron,
      LLC (formerly Good Times Restaurants, LLC)
    Illinois
    June 18, 2002E&C San Francisco, LLC
    California
    November 12, 2002BC Restaurants, LLC
    California
    November 12, 2002E&C Capital, LLC
    Delaware
    April 29, 2004


---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Subsidiary                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Formation
         ----------                     ---------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>
Cableshare B.V.                                       Netherlands
Cable Share International Inc.                        Barbados
Cableshare (U.S.) Limited                             Illinois
Interactive Channel, Inc.                             Delaware
Interactive Channel Technologies Inc.                 Ontario, Canada
IT Network, Inc.                                      Delaware
1229501 Ontario Inc.                                  Ontario, Canada
997758 Ontario Inc.                                   Ontario, Canada
SMI Holdings, Inc.                                    Delaware
Source Investments, Inc.                              Nevada
SourceSuite LLC(1)                                    Delaware
</TABLE>


(1) The Company directly owns 50% of the membership interests and acts as the
manager of SourceSuite LLC.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Those Responsible for the Murder of Shakeel Khan

# 									Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Those Responsible for the Murder of Shakeel Khan							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 30, 2023

The U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice (RFJ) program, which is administered by the Diplomatic Security Service, is offering a reward of up to $5 million for certain information leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual, who committed, attempted or conspired to commit, or aided or abetted in the commission of the murder of Shakeel Khan.

Shakeel Khan, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, was murdered outside his place of employment in Johnson City, New York on March 30, 2019.

Khan, a native of the Swat region in Pakistan, was openly involved in political activities opposing terrorist organizations in that country.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of New York and the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force are investigating the murder of Shakeel Khan.  In November 2020, the FBI issued a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible for the murder. The reward offer from RFJ is in addition to the FBI’s reward offer and seeks information that would assist the FBI in identifying those responsible for Khan’s murder.

More information about this reward offer is located on the Rewards for Justice website at www.rewardsforjustice.net. Anyone with information on those responsible for the murder of Shakeel Khan should contact Rewards for Justice via Signal, Telegram, or WhatsApp at +1-202-702-7843.  All information will be kept strictly confidential.

Since its inception in 1984, Rewards for Justice has paid out in excess of $250 million to more than 125 people across the globe who provided actionable information that helped resolve threats to U.S. national security. Follow RFJ on Twitter at https://twitter.com/RFJ_USA.

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonPakistanRewards for JusticeTerrorism

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23.01



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
LXR Biotechnology Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92488) on Form S-8 of LXR Biotechnology Inc. and subsidiary, a development
stage enterprise, of our report dated February 22, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of LXR Biotechnology Inc. and subsidiary as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998 and for the period from April
20, 1992 (date of incorporation) through December 31, 1998, which report appears
in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of LXR Biotechnology Inc.

Our report dated February 22, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
limited liquidity, both of which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



                                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 29, 1999
# C_2014081EN.01001101.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/11

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Fürstentum Liechtenstein dated 21 October 2013 in the case of the Hellenic Capital Market Commission

(Case E-23/13)

2014/C 81/10

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 21 October 2013 from Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Fürstentum Liechtenstein (the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 25 October 2013, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of the Hellenic Capital Market Commission, on the following question:

Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Fürstentum Liechtenstein

Must an authority making a request to the competent authority of another Member State in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2003/6/EC set out in its request the facts that give rise to the suspicion that the prohibition on insider dealing and market manipulation has been infringed?

---
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 23 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of OM Group, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of OM Group, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997:



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration Number                     Description                             Filing Date
-------------------                     -----------                             -----------
<S>                         <C>                                                <C>
33-74674                    OM Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation
                              Plan -- Form S-8 Registration Statement --
                              1,015,625 Shares                                 January 27, 1994

333-07529                  OMG Americas, Inc. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan
                              -- Form S-8 Registration Statement -- 250,000
                              Shares                                           July 3, 1996

333-07531                  OM Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Equity
                              Plan  -- Form S-8 Registration Statement --
                              250,000 Shares                                   July 3, 1996

                                                        
Cleveland, Ohio
March 19, 1998                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report of Acadia Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan W. Grisham, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Jonathan W. Grisham


Jonathan W. Grisham


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


February 28, 2012
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                          NATIONAL HOME CENTERS, INC.


                    Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share

                  Years ended January 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended January 31
                                              -----------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>                   <C>
                                                          2001                  2000                 1999
                                                    ----------            ----------          -----------

Net earnings (loss)                                 $  225,840            $1,115,381          $(2,959,443)
                                                    ----------            ----------          -----------

Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                             7,142,251             7,142,251            7,142,251
                                                    ==========            ==========          ===========

Earnings (loss) per share                           $     0.03            $     0.16          $     (0.41)
                                                    ==========            ==========          ===========
</TABLE>
#### § 263.101 Standards for awards.

A respondent in a covered proceeding that prevails on the merits of that proceeding against the Board, and that is eligible under this subpart as defined in § 263.103, may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in the proceeding unless the position of the Board during the proceeding was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The position of the Board includes, in addition to the position taken by the Board in the adversary proceeding, the action or failure to act by the Board upon which the adversary proceeding was based. An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceedings.