alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10013 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALONZO RICHARD, also known as Tony Sinclair, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-254-H

- - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alonzo Richard, federal prisoner # 23088-077, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal. Richard has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See United States v. Boutwell , 896 F.2d 884, 889-90 (5th Cir. 1990)(one-judge order). Richard’s motion requesting concurrence form was actually a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion which the district court was without jurisdiction to consider without our authorization. Accordingly, Richard’s motion to proceed IFP onNo. 99-10013 -2- appeal is DENIED. Because Richard’s appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Richard’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED. IFP MOTION DENIED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, October 16, 2009; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. Approval of Minutes of September 3, September 11 and September 24 Meetings.

III. Announcements.

IV. Staff Director's Report.

V. Program Planning.
    - Update on Status of 2010 Enforcement Report
    - Approval of First Quarter FY 2010 Briefing Report Topic
    - Update on Status of Briefing Reports; Approval of Commissioner Deadlines for Consideration of Briefing Reports
    - Approval of Calendar of 2010 Commission Meetings
    - National Conference Subcommittee Issues
    - Motion to Appoint Additional Member to the Subcommittee
    - Motion to Delegate to the Subcommittee the Authority to Set the National Conference Date

VI. State Advisory Committee Issues.
    - Reconsideration of a Nominee for the Hawaii SAC

VII. Adjourn.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: October 6, 2009.

Martin Dannenfelser,

Staff Director.

[FR Doc. E9-24433 Filed 10-6-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
SERVED : FEBRUARY28 , 201 2 

### U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARFNG S WASHINGTON , D C "•APARTMEN TO F •;';;K£ TOPERATIONS ^ 

## m i FE B 2 ^ P1

^ ^" ^ ns i THEMATTERO F PLATINU M AI RSERVICE , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2012-002 5 

## HEARIN G NOTIC E NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVEN tha t testimon y andevidenc e will b e heardandconsidere d on Jun e 6 , 2012 . inclusive , i n th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Labo r Courtroom , Suit e 5150 , th e Glen n M . Anderso n Federa l Building , 50 1 Wes t Ocea n Boulevard , Lon g Beach , CA . 90802 . Hearing s will commenc e a t 9:0 0 a.m . andconclud e a t 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday . Settle dcase s wil l no t

b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s) . Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expres s mail , courie r o r posta l service . TchardjC . Goodwi n O.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2012-002 5 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention . Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Arthu r Washerman , Responden f \ s Counse l La w Offic e o f

Arthu r Wasserma n 1638 0 Rosco e Boulevard , Suit e 12 0 Va n Nuys,C A 91406-122 1 TEL : 818-895-823 4 FAX : 818-895-067 5 Nichola s R . Milliard , Complainan i \ s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f

Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington . D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-345 2 FAX ; 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Adminislrafiv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r sen-ic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use tli

c followin g address : Fcdern

l Aviatio n Adniinislration . 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suil

e 2W1000 , Wasliington, D C 20591 , Altcmio

n Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC430 .

- 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2781 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2781

          To provide greater health care freedom for seniors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To provide greater health care freedom for seniors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors Citizen's Freedom of 
Choice''.

SEC. 2. NO ELIGIBILITY CONDITION BASED ON REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN A 
              GOVERNMENT PROGRAM.

    No persons otherwise eligible for old-age benefits under Social 
Security shall be denied such benefits because of their voluntary 
refusal to participate in any part of the Medicare program.
                                 <all>
```
§ 252.83 U.S. Special Resolution Regimes. ( a ) *Covered QFCs not required to be conformed.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding § 252.82, a covered entity is not required to conform a covered QFC to the requirements of this section if: ( i ) The covered QFC designates, in the manner described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the U.S. special resolution regimes as part of the law governing the QFC; and
( ii ) Each party to the covered QFC, other than the covered entity, is: ( A ) An individual that is domiciled in the United States, including any State;
( B ) A company that is incorporated in or organized under the laws of the United States or any State;
( C ) A company the principal place of business of which is located in the United States, including any State; or
( D ) A U.S. branch or U.S. agency.
( 2 ) A covered QFC designates the U.S. special resolution regimes as part of the law governing the QFC if the covered QFC: ( i ) Explicitly provides that the covered QFC is governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States; and
( ii ) Does not explicitly provide that one or both of the U.S. special resolution regimes, or a broader set of laws that includes a U.S. special resolution regime, is excluded from the laws governing the covered QFC.
( b ) *Provisions required.* A covered QFC must explicitly provide that: ( 1 ) In the event the covered entity becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. special resolution regime, the transfer of the covered QFC (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, the covered QFC) from the covered entity will be effective to the same extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. special resolution regime if the covered QFC (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, the covered QFC) were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States; and
( 2 ) In the event the covered entity or an affiliate of the covered entity becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. special resolution regime, default rights with respect to the covered QFC that may be exercised against the covered entity are permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than the default rights could be exercised under the U.S. special resolution regime if the covered QFC were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States.
( c ) *Relevance of creditor protection provisions.* The requirements of this section apply notwithstanding paragraphs (d), (f), and (h) of § 252.84.
# C_2021467EN.01000501.xml

| 19.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 467/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 467/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 November 2021

(2021/C 467/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1345 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84173 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0511 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9523 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,230 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 363,69 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6565 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9497 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 12,5522 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5580 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4295 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8366 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6106 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5408 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 342,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7211 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2419 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5120 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 138,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7439 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,099 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,8200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,030 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2839 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5605 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,2180 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1345

JPY

Japanese yen

129,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84173

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0511

ISK

Iceland króna

148,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9523

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,230

HUF

Hungarian forint

363,69

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6565

RON

Romanian leu

4,9497

TRY

Turkish lira

12,5522

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5580

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4295

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8366

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6106

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5408

KRW

South Korean won

1 342,26

ZAR

South African rand

17,7211

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2419

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5120

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 138,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7439

PHP

Philippine peso

57,099

RUB

Russian rouble

82,8200

THB

Thai baht

37,030

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2839

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5605

INR

Indian rupee

84,2180

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>   1
<TABLE>
                                                                                                           EXHIBIT 11.0


                                                          MICROCOM, INC.
                                                                 
                                                CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                               FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994

                                                            (Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
                                                                         Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                                         -------------------       -------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)                                   1995       1994           1995       1994
                                                                         --------   --------       --------   --------
<S>                                                                       <C>        <C>            <C>        <C>
Net income .....................................................          $ 3,459    $ 1,529        $ 8,662    $ 4,090
                                                                          =======    =======        =======    =======
Reconciliation of average number of shares outstanding to
 amount used in net income per share computation:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding ................           15,339     10,792         14,054     10,697
  Assumed exercise of stock options ............................            1,376      1,129          1,142      1,305
                                                                          -------    -------        -------    -------
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
   as adjusted .................................................           16,715     11,921         15,196     12,002
                                                                          -------    -------        -------    -------

Net income per share ...........................................          $   .21    $   .13        $   .57    $   .34
                                                                          =======    =======        =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                      22
I**~NCE** R. LEfLEUR DIRECTOR RoBERT J. BENTLEY GOVER N O

R

Blnnlnllllam Branch /\ pril23 . 2013 \labama Oep.utment of Environmental Managem ent ndem.alabama
. gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd
. 3611().2400 • Post Office Box 301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130· 1463 (334) 271-7700 • FAX (334) 271-7950

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator EPA Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W . Atlanta, GA 30303
- 8960 Dear Ms. Fleming : Pursuant to Section II 0 of the Clean Air Act, the Alabama Department of Environmental Managemc:nt formally submits lor your approval and inclusion in the Alabama State Implementation Plan (SIP), the redesignation request and maintenance plan tor the Jackson County portion o f the Chattanooga Nonattainmenl Area ( " Chattanooga NAA'') tor the 1997 Annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) tor line particulute matter (PM 2 5). This proposed SIP revision was available for public comment from February 24, 2013, to March 29, 2013 . We received no request for 

### a hearing . The only comments received were from EPA, and these comments have been addressed . Our reconciliation ofcomments is enclosed. The Jackson County portion of the Chattanooga NAA, located in Northeast Alabama, is geographically comprised of a single census block group in Jackson County, Alabama. On May 31 , 20 II. EPA promulgated its determination that the Chattanooga nonattainment area had attained the 1997 annual average PM 25 NAAQS . This detennination was based upon quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring data tor the 2007
-2009 period, which showed all monitors attained the Annual PM n NAAQS of 15**g/ .**  This tinal rule became effective on June 30 , 2011. Monitoring data through 20 II indicates that the area continues to meet the annual PM 2 5 NAAQS. Based on this monitoring data, the Department is requesting rcdesignation of the Jackson County portion of the NAA to attainment status for the 1997 Annual PM 2. 5 NAAQS . If you need additional information concerning this submittal, please call Ron Gore of my staff at (334) 271-7868. Sincerely,

# !ll~m~ Lance R. LeFieur Director LRLIR WG:mmm/bdc

Decatur Branch Mobile Branch Moblr..coastal 110 Vu l can Road Bi rm in gham , AL 352094 702 r2 0 5J 9 42 · 6168 2 715 Sandlin Roa d . S
. W Oecat u r . Al 3 5603· 1 3 33 1 256) 353· 171 3 2204 Perimet e r Road M abile , Al 36615-113 1 (251) 450-3400 t 25 l ) 479-2593 t FAXJ 4 171 Commande rs Drive Mo bile. AL 36615- 1 421 

# I (2 51 ) 4 32·6533 ! 205 ) 9 41 - 1603 ( F AX ) :?56) 3 40.9359 (FAX) I I \ ! 251 ) 432· 6598 (FAX)

# ,

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming

cc : 

### Scott Davis 13cvcrly Bannister Lynorae Benjamin fo 'i le : I' -8-154 1 

### April 23, 2013
# C_2007033EN.01000601.xml

| 15.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/6

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Borgarting Lagmannsrett by decision of that court of 9 October 2006 in the case of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines v Staten v/Finansdepartementet

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Staten v/Finansdepartementet

(Case E-4/06)

(2007/C 33/04)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by decision of 9 October 2006 of Borgarting Lagmannsrett (Borgarting Court of Appeal), which was received at the Court Registry on 16 October 2006, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines v Staten v/Finansdepartementet (The Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Finance) on the following question:

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Staten v/Finansdepartementet

| 1. | What are the legal basis and the prerequisites for a claim of reimbursement of taxes which a Member State has collected in conflict with provisions of the EEA Agreement? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What are the legal basis and the prerequisites for a claim of reimbursement of taxes which a Member State has collected in conflict with provisions of the EEA Agreement?

---
Estimated Costs: 

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Replacment 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Costs per Product (e.g., akcra:ft, engine, I nroueller, aonliance) 

Work·hours Labor Parts Cost 

(include cost 

access, testing, (@$8,Sih 

and close-un) ourl 

1.5 :5 1::::7.:50 $1,000 

s t}_or: 

:;_( .. C 

Total Costs 

(labor+ 

pam) 

; !. '· 'i 

·s . . ;,;. 

:S C::;<:· 

s C·.Ci! 

C.CO 

:S G.;}!) .• r;_,;e .. 

I O.•}C· 

$ C.OO 

.'!i ;;_,)( 

0 0f; 

$ D.\J( 

Number of 

u.s. 

Registered 

Products 

341 

The known number of oroducts in comoliance: 

Total Costs of comoliance for U.S. fleet: 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) 

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

(',li(' 

'<" 

':'. ;)(; 

' ;).!)C s \)_(:!; 

;)_··,;; 

$384,478 

$ 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeun) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hmrr) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES'0 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer .• 

YESO 

Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could' affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

YES'0 

*Explanation:
§ 201.3 Extensions of credit generally. ( a ) *Advances to and discounts for a depository institution.* ( 1 ) A Federal Reserve Bank may lend to a depository institution either by making an advance secured by acceptable collateral under § 201.4 of this part or by discounting certain types of paper. A Federal Reserve Bank generally extends credit by making an advance.
( 2 ) An advance to a depository institution must be secured to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve Bank that makes the advance. Satisfactory collateral generally includes United States government and federal-agency securities, and, if of acceptable quality, mortgage notes covering one-to four-family residences, state and local government securities, and business, consumer, and other customer notes.
( 3 ) If a Federal Reserve Bank concludes that a discount would meet the needs of a depository institution or an institution described in section 13A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 349) more effectively, the Reserve Bank may discount any paper indorsed by the institution, provided the paper meets the requirements specified in the Federal Reserve Act.
( b ) *No obligation to make advances or discounts.* This section does not entitle any person or entity to obtain any credit or any increase, renewal or extension of maturity of any credit from a Federal Reserve Bank.
( c ) *Information requirements.* ( 1 ) Before extending credit to a depository institution, a Federal Reserve Bank should determine if the institution is an undercapitalized insured depository institution or a critically undercapitalized insured depository institution and, if so, follow the lending procedures specified in § 201.5.
( 2 ) Each Federal Reserve Bank shall require any information it believes appropriate or desirable to ensure that assets tendered as collateral for advances or for discount are acceptable and that the borrower uses the credit provided in a manner consistent with this part.
( 3 ) Each Federal Reserve Bank shall: ( i ) Keep itself informed of the general character and amount of the loans and investments of a depository institution as provided in section 4(8) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 301); and
( ii ) Consider such information in determining whether to extend credit.
( d ) *Indirect credit for others.* Except for depository institutions that receive primary credit as described in § 201.4(a), no depository institution shall act as the medium or agent of another depository institution in receiving Federal Reserve credit except with the permission of the Federal Reserve Bank extending credit.
[Reg. A, 67 FR 67786, Nov. 7, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 65016, Dec. 9, 2009; 80 FR 78965, Dec. 18, 2015; 83 FR 21168, May 9, 2018]