alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2798

For the relief of Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin Thomas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2003

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin 

Thomas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Ms. Gracekutty Thomas and her son 

7 Gladwin Thomas shall be held and considered to have been 

8 lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent resi9 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 

10 payment of the required visa fees. 
2

•HR 2798 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ms. 

3 Gracekutty Thomas and her son Gladwin Thomas, as pro4 vided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

5 proper officer to reduce by the appropriate number during 

6 the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas 

7 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

8 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
#### § 1808.503 Consultation with Appropriate Regulatory Agencies.

In the case of any CDFI Bond Guarantee Program applicant that is a Federally regulated financial institution (or an Affiliate thereof), the CDFI Fund may consult with the Appropriate Federal Banking Agency or Appropriate State Agency prior to designating the applicant as a Qualified Issuer, Servicer, Master Servicer/Trustee, Program Administrator or other role, making a final Guarantee commitment, issuing a Guarantee, and/or entering into an Agreement to Guarantee. The CDFI Fund also reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to consult with the Appropriate Federal Banking Agency and Appropriate State Agency with respect to any Eligible CDFI that is proposed to receive a Bond Loan or any Secondary Borrower that is proposed to receive a Secondary Loan.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0294]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; extension of comment period; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice; extension of comment period that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 1, 2009 (74 FR 50810). The notice; extension of comment period announced that FDA is extending to December 28, 2009, the comment period for a notice that originally published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 1, 2009 (74 FR 31457). The notice; extension of comment period published with an inadvertent error in the                         **DATES**                         section. This document corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joyce Strong, Office of Policy (HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7010.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E9-23607, appearing on page 50810, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Thursday, October 1, 2009, the following correction is made:                

                    1. On page 50810, in the second column, the “                    **DATES**                    ” section is corrected to read “Submit electronic or written comments by December 28, 2009.”.                

Dated: October 1, 2009.

David Horowitz,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24214 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
42597.

#### SMITH v. GLENN.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Frank Glenn brought this action against Hugh A. Smith to recover for personal injuries caused by defendant’s negligence. The undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff was riding as a guest passenger in a pickup truck operated by defendant. It was nighttime, and the truck was traveling at a speed of approximately 45 miles per hour on a rural post road over hilly terrain and approaching a curve downgrade to the right. Defendant dropped a lighted cigarette, which fell to the floor of the truck. Defendant made no effort to stop the truck, but immediately bent over, as low as he could, to look for the cigarette, averting his eyes from the road for several seconds. While defendant was thus preoccupied, the vehicle ran off the road onto the left shoulder. Defendant then “cut” the vehicle back to the right, and it ran off the road on the right, turned over and crashed into an embankment, injuring plaintiff. There was no evidence that plaintiff was contributorily negligent or that he could have avoided the consequences of defendant’s negligence. Under the facts of this case, it was a question for the jury whether the defendant was guilty of gross negligence, and the trial court erred in directing a verdict for plaintiff on the issue of liability. See *Smith v. Hodges,*44 Ga. App. 318, 321 (161 SE 284); *Jordan v. Lee,*51 Ga. App. 99 (2, 3) (179 SE 739); *Capers v. Martin,*54 Ga. App. 555 (3, 4) (188 *528SE 465); *Austin v. Smith,*96 Ga. App. 659, 663 (101 SE2d 169).

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Submitted February 7, 1967

Decided April 4, 1967.

*Erwin, Birchmore & Epting, Denny C. Galis,*for appellant.

*Grant & Matthews, William F. Grant, C. A. Matthews,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*
42809.

#### BROWN v. THE STATE.

Pannbll, Judge.

Mrs. Mamie C. Brown was tried on an accusation that contained two counts charging her with the illegal sale of whiskey. She was convicted on Count 1 and acquitted on Count 2, and we are not here concerned with the latter count.

1. The evidence under the first count was that the state revenue officer purchased from the defendant a pint bottle which contained one-half pint of whiskey. The officer testified that the bottle shown him was the one he bought from the defendant, that his initials which appeared on the top of the bottle were placed there by him and that it was whiskey. He also identified it by revenue stamps attached to the bottle. *Held:*

(a) This was positive identification, and the court, did not err in admitting it in evidence over the objection of the defendant’s attorney as follows: “I object to the admission of both State’s Exhibit No. 1 and State’s Exhibit No. 2, on the grounds that they have not properly been identified. The proper foundation has not been laid for their introduction into evidence, and we object to it.” (Exhibit No. 2 has no bearing on Count 1.)

(b) This was the only objection made to the introduction of the evidence at the time it was offered and admitted. If there were other objections they should have been made and urged at that time. It is well settled that this court can only consider objections made to evidence at the time the ruling was made. *Harris v. State,*156 Ga. 582 (1) (119 SE 519); *Langston v. State,*153 Ga. 127 (1) (111 SE 561).

2. Error is assigned on the overruling of a motion “to exclude the entire testimony [of a named witness] on the ground that he has violated the rules of evidence, that he used notes that he made this morning, according to his own testimony, some seven and one-half months after the transaction, from somebody else’s notes.”

The evidence of this witness is rather lengthy, he testified that *814he had refreshed his memory as to parts of his testimony from the notes of his fellow officer, and as to some of his testimony, he did not refresh his memory by such notes.

*Bell, P. J., and Joslin, J., concur.*

Submitted May 1, 1967

Decided June 2, 1967.

*Vaughn E. Terrell, Harold N. Wollstein,*for appellant.

*Robert G. Walther, Solicitor,*for appellee.

Assuming but not deciding that a portion of the witness’s testimony was inadmissible, a great portion of it was admissible— and it was not error for the court to overrule the motion. It is well settled that, when a large portion of a witness’s testimony is objected to, an order overruling the objection will not be reversed if any part of the evidence is not subject to the objection made. See *Jackson v. State,*213 Ga. 275 (2) (98 SE2d 571); *Gully v. State,*116 Ga. 527 (2) (42 SE 790); *Barnard v. State,*119 Ga. 436 (3) (46 SE 644).

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2021470EN.01000301.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 470/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 470/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 November 2021

(2021/C 470/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1271 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83928 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0960 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0462 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0483 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,413 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 367,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6818 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 12,5247 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5581 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4254 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7832 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6098 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5344 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7513 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2027 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5160 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 105,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7152 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,073 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,8124 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,969 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2680 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4637 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,6905 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1271

JPY

Japanese yen

128,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83928

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0960

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0462

ISK

Iceland króna

147,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0483

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,413

HUF

Hungarian forint

367,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6818

RON

Romanian leu

4,9495

TRY

Turkish lira

12,5247

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5581

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4254

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7832

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6098

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5344

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,64

ZAR

South African rand

17,7513

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2027

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5160

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 105,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7152

PHP

Philippine peso

57,073

RUB

Russian rouble

82,8124

THB

Thai baht

36,969

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2680

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4637

INR

Indian rupee

83,6905

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 221.125 Credit to brokers and dealers. ( a ) The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-290, 110 Stat. 3416) restricts the Board's margin authority by repealing section 8(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and amending section 7 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78g) to exclude the borrowing by a member of a national securities exchange or a registered broker or dealer “a substantial portion of whose business consists of transactions with persons other than brokers or dealers” and borrowing by a member of a national securities exchange or a registered broker or dealer to finance its activities as a market maker or an underwriter. Notwithstanding this exclusion, the Board may impose such rules and regulations if it determines they are “necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.”
( b ) The Board has not found that it is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors to impose rules and regulations regarding loans to brokers and dealers covered by the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee.

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income 
Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be Thursday, November 12, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee will be held Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 1 
p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. 
Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us 
at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-24108 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          96,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,659,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                   455,322
<INVENTORY>                                  8,895,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,392,126
<PP&E>                                      11,168,088
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,321,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,594,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,688,232
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,230
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,179,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,594,938
<SALES>                                      9,752,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,752,202
<CGS>                                        5,976,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,354,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,603)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (589,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (241,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (348,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (348,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1075.107 Allocating funds to consumer education and financial literacy programs. ( a ) If funds available under § 1075.105(c) remain after the Fund Administrator allocates funds as described in § 1075.106(a), the Fund Administrator may allocate those remaining funds for consumer education and financial literacy programs.
( b ) The Fund Administrator shall not have the authority to allocate funds to particular consumer education or financial literacy programs or otherwise to select the particular consumer education or financial literacy programs for which allocated funds will be used.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01




                            LXR BIOTECHNOLOGY INC.

                      COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Year Ended          Year Ended           Year Ended
                              December 31, 1996   December 31, 1995   December 31, 1994
                              -----------------   -----------------   -----------------
<S>                             <C>                <C>                 <C>
Net loss....................... $(7,622,999)       $  (6,315,947)      $  (5,913,541)
                                ===========         =============       =============

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

  Common stock.................  15,762,729            7,513,541           6,267,407

  Common stock
    subscribed................       52,766                   --                  --
                                -----------        -------------       -------------
                                 15,815,495            7,513,541           6,267,407
                                ===========        =============       =============

Net loss per share.........     $      (.48)       $        (.84)      $        (.94)
                                ===========        =============       =============
</TABLE>
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–708

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

FOR THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE INDEPENDENCE DAY DISTRICT WORK PERIOD

JUNE 28, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 541]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 541, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of a concurrent resolution of either House providing for the adjournment of the two

Houses during the Independence Day district work period. The rule

waives all points of order against the consideration of the resolution. Finally, the rule lays House Resolutions 469 and 482 on the

table.

While adjournment resolutions are ordinarily privileged, a point

of order could be raised against the July 4th district work period

resolution on the grounds that it violates section 309 of the Budget

Act, which requires that the House cannot adjourn for more than

three calendar days in July if it has not completed action on all appropriations bills. A point of order could also be raised on the

grounds that it violates section 310(f) of the Budget Act, which requires that the House cannot adjourn for more than three calendar

days in July unless the House has completed action on any required reconciliation legislation, if the budget resolution requires

reconciliation.

Æ
§ 1237.11 Authority of limited-life regulated entities to obtain credit. ( a ) *Ability to obtain credit.* A limited-life regulated entity may obtain unsecured credit and issue unsecured debt.
( b ) *Inability to obtain credit.* If a limited-life regulated entity is unable to obtain unsecured credit or issue unsecured debt, the Director may authorize the obtaining of credit or the issuance of debt by the limited-life regulated entity with priority over any and all of the obligations of the limited-life regulated entity, secured by a lien on property of the limited-life regulated entity that is not otherwise subject to a lien, or secured by a junior lien on property of the limited-life regulated entity that is subject to a lien.
( c ) *Limitations.* The Director, after notice and a hearing, may authorize a limited-life regulated entity to obtain credit or issue debt that is secured by a senior or equal lien on property of the limited-life regulated entity that is already subject to a lien (other than mortgages that collateralize the mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by an Enterprise) only if the limited-life regulated entity is unable to obtain such credit or issue such debt otherwise on commercially reasonable terms and there is adequate protection of the interest of the holder of the earlier lien on the property with respect to which such senior or equal lien is proposed to be granted.
( d ) *Adequate protection.* The adequate protection referred to in paragraph (c) of this section may be provided by: ( 1 ) Requiring the limited-life regulated entity to make a cash payment or periodic cash payments to the holder of the earlier lien, to the extent that there is likely to be a decrease in the value of such holder's interest in the property subject to the lien;
( 2 ) Providing to the holder of the earlier lien an additional or replacement lien to the extent that there is likely to be a decrease in the value of such holder's interest in the property subject to the lien; or
( 3 ) Granting the holder of the earlier lien such other relief, other than entitling such holder to compensation allowable as an administrative expense under section 1367(c) of the Safety and Soundness Act, as will result in the realization by such holder of the equivalent of such holder's interest in such property.