alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014088EN.01001401.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 6 December 2013

in Case E-15/13

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EEA State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests)

2014/C 88/11

In Case E-15/13, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to adopt, or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 7d of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests), as adapted by the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 6 December 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 7d of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests), as adapted by the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 7d of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests), as adapted by the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement;

| 2. | orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 225

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

#### § 225.196 Information to be presented to the Appraisal Subcommittee by participating States.

Each State electing to register AMCs for purposes of permitting AMCs to provide appraisal management services relating to covered transactions in the State must submit to the Appraisal Subcommittee the information required to be submitted by Appraisal Subcommittee regulations or guidance concerning AMCs that operate in the State.
#### Martin J. Cassidy et al., Respondents, *v.*Elias Spingarn, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Hoadly, Lauterbach *&*Johnson (Henry Siegrist, Jr., and Alfred Lauterbach, of counsel), for appellant.

Mandelbaum Bros., for respondents.

Conlan, J.

This action was brought upon an alleged contract for the purchase of seventeen bales of a certain brand of tobacco, of which two were received and paid for.

*753It is claimed by the plaintiffs that they had an option on the balance of fifteen bales for one week, which they exercised within the period, but the defendant failed to comply therewith.

The defense is that two bales were purchased, and that an option of two days was given on the balance, which was not exercised.

The charge is somewhat voluminous and covered the whole case, and, we think, very fairly submitted the questions involved for the consideration of the jury.

Upon the questions of the contract itself there was, as we have already seen, a conflict, so also was there a dispute as to the amount of damages recoverable thereunder, but these precise questions went to the jury without any objection other than may be inferred from the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint; however, no exception was taken to the charge or to any portion thereof, so that the form of submission must have been entirely satisfactory.

That the motion to dismiss was properly denied is evident, because of the serious conflict of evidence, and because there was evidence sufficient to entitle the plaintiffs to go to the jury upon the question of the contract and the damages which might flow from its breach.

We have -carefully examined the record for any errors which might have been committed upon the trial calling for our interference with the determination there had, and we are not able to find anything which calls for such interference on this appeal.

Judgment and order appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
From: Brian Coffey

Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:04 PM

To: Rob Greeson; thomas.patzner@schneider-e lectric.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com

Cc: Matthew Nardotti; Chris Bolduc; Richard Parker

Subject: LV Negotiating Group Technical Subcommittee

Rob, Thomas, Vijay,

I was not able to attend last Wednesday’s LV Negotiation Committee meeting, unfortunately, but

learned of the establishment of a LV Technical Committee convened to look specifically at the

engineering analysis. First, are there others that I ought to be including? Second, what steps did you

have in min d for us to beg in working? I will start by including a template I sent to the MV Committee

members this afternoon that could be used to facilitate an bidirectional exchange of engineering data.

I believe we have standing nondisclosure agreements with Federal and Schneider, Rob and Thomas.

Vijay, I would be happy to set one up if you wished to provide con f idential engineering data to Navigant.

I’ll copy/paste my email to the MV group below.

Best,

Brian

MV Committee Members,

Several of the group have proposed that DOE facilitate a bidirectional exchange of engineering data.

Attached is one kind of te mplate tha t could be used to compare the ways in which different parties can

achieve certain efficiency levels. DOE would populate the spreadsheet with detailed design information

for the least cost transformers able to achieve the draft efficiency levels using different steels.

Data provided to DOE could then be co mpared to the DOE d esigns and differences explained. Because

this data would likely be considered confidential, Navigant is willing to enter into nondisclosure

agreements with any party submitting such data. This process would first be used to verify the

engineering analysis of the current representative units and could be expanded to analyze scaling

relationships.

We welcome comme nts and spe cific suggestions of how this process could be implemented.

Best,

Brian Coffey

______________________________________________________________ Brian Coffey | Senior Consultant | Energy | Navigant Consulting, Inc.

1801 K Street NW | Suite 500 | Washington, DC 20006

+1.202.481.7521 Office
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC21-1189

____________

IN RE: AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL 

PROCEDURE 3.691.

May 19, 2022

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a proposed 

amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691. See Fla. 

R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). We have jurisdiction. See

art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee 

(Committee) filed a report proposing an amendment to Florida Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 3.691 (Post-Trial Release). The Board of 

Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously approved the 

Committee’s proposal. The Committee and the Court published the 

proposal for comment in The Florida Bar News, but no comments 

were received.
- 2 -

Having considered the Committee’s report, the Court hereby 

adopts the amendment as proposed by the Committee. In 

subdivision (a) (When Authorized) of rule 3.691, the phrase 

“adjudicated guilty of” is replaced by the phrase “sentenced for.” 

This amendment clarifies that post-trial release is available to 

defendants who otherwise qualify for release where the adjudication 

was withheld.

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Criminal 

Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New 

language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by 

struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective 

July 1, 2022, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, 

COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER 

THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Alan S. Apte, Chair, Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Orlando, 

Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, and Mikalla Andies 

Davis, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner
- 3 -

APPENDIX

RULE 3.691. POST-TRIAL RELEASE

(a) When Authorized. A defendant who has been 

adjudicated guilty ofsentenced for the commission of any noncapital offense for which bail is not prohibited under section 

903.133, Florida Statutes, may be released, pending review of the 

conviction, at the discretion of either the trial or appellate court, 

applying the principles enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So. 2d 

308 (Fla. 1956). No defendant may be admitted to bail on appeal 

from a conviction of a felony unless the defendant establishes that 

the appeal is taken in good faith, on grounds fairly debatable, and 

not frivolous. However, in no case shall bail be granted if the 

defendant has previously been convicted of a felony, the 

commission of which occurred prior to the commission of the 

subsequent felony, and the defendant’s civil rights have not been 

restored or if other felony charges are pending against the 

defendant and probable cause has been found that the defendant 

has committed the felony or felonies at the time the request for bail 

is made.

(b) – (e) [No change]

Committee Notes

[No change]
RICK SNYDER 

GOVERNOR 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

LANSING 

February 13,2012 

r ^ 

CO 

ro 

••. V 

en 

KIRKT. STEUDLE 

; ; OIRECTOR 

113 

O'.' 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Subject: Alternate Essential Air Service Proposal, Docket# DOT-OST-2004-18715 

The Michigan Department of Transportation's Office of Aeronautics is the agency tasked with 

promoting air service within the State of Michigan. As such, we express our strong support for 

the Alternative Essential Air Service proposal of the Manistee-Blacker Airport Authority 

(MBAA) under Docket# DOT-OST-2004-18715. 

We believe that the proposal, while unconventional, offers a reasonable chance for the 

commimity to retain air service and build upon recent gains in ridership. As structured, the 

proposal allows the community service by Public Charters, Inc. (in coordination with Charter Air 

Transport) to Chicago Midway Airport. 

A significant portion of the Manistee origin and destination traffic is centered in the Greater 

Chicago Area. In addition, the MBAA plans to partner with Public Charters Inc. to develop 

interline agreements with other Chicago-based airlines to enhance travel options for Manisteebased travelers. These factors, combined with strong community support, provide an excellent 

opportunity to build upon the positive trend in local support for air service. 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for this proposal. If you have any 

questions or would like to discuss the proposal fUrther, please feel fi-ee to contact me at 

517-335-9568 or Mr. Matt Brinker at 517-335-9918. 

Sincerely, 

Mike Trout, Executive Administrator 

Office of Aeronautics 

MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING • P.O. BOX 30050 • LANSING. MICHIGAN 48909 

www.mlchigan.gov • (517) 373-2090 

LH-LAN-0 (01/11)
121 STAT. 230 PUBLIC LAW 110–38—JUNE 21, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 676:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–35 (Comm. on Foreign Relations).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Mar. 15, considered and passed Senate.

June 11, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 110–38

110th Congress

An Act

To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American Development Bank

or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-American Development Bank

may serve on the Board of Directors of the Inter-American Foundation.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR

ALTERNATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK TO THE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION.

The third sentence of section 401(g) of the Foreign Assistance

Act of 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f(g)) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘Three members of the Board shall be appointed from among the

following: officers or employees of agencies of the United States

concerned with inter-American affairs, the United States Executive

Director of the Inter-American Development Bank, or the Alternate

Executive Director of the Inter-American Development Bank.’’.

Approved June 21, 2007.

June 21, 2007

[S. 676]
§ 1777.24 Notice of intent to issue an order. ( a ) *Orders under section 1366 of the 1992 Act ( 12 U.S.C. 4616 ).* In addition to any other action taken under this part, part 1780 of this chapter, or any other applicable authority, OFHEO may, in its discretion, issue an order to an Enterprise that is classified as significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized, or is in conservatorship, directing the Enterprise to take one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Limit any increase in, or reduce, any obligations of the Enterprise, including off-balance sheet obligations;
( 2 ) Limit or eliminate growth of the Enterprise's assets or reduce the amount of the Enterprise's assets;
( 3 ) Acquire new capital, in such form and amount as determined by OFHEO; or
( 4 ) Terminate, reduce, or modify any activity of the Enterprise that OFHEO determines creates excessive risk to the Enterprise.
( b ) *Notice of intent to issue an order.* Before OFHEO issues an order to an Enterprise pursuant to section 1366 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4616), OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with written notice containing the proposed order.
( c ) *Contents of notice.* A notice of intent to issue an order under this subpart shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of the Enterprise's capital classification and its minimum capital level or critical capital level, and its risk-based capital level;
( 2 ) A description of the restrictions, prohibitions, or affirmative actions that OFHEO proposes to impose or require; and
( 3 ) The proposed date when such restrictions or prohibitions would become effective or the proposed date for the commencement and/or completion of the affirmative actions.
Exhibit 32.2
                          RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with the periodic report of Riviera Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Duane Krohn, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  March 25, 2005
                                       /s/ Duane Krohn
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.6.1

               FIRST AMENDMENT TO MARKETING AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

        This Amendment No. 1 ("this Amendment") to that certain Marketing and
License Agreement dated September 30, 1999 (the "Agreement") by and between
FREEREALTIME.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation ("FRT") and TELESCAN, INC. a
Delaware corporation ("Telescan") is made and entered into by FRT and Telescan
and is dated and effective as of March 2, 2000.

        In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Telescan and FRT agree as follows:

        1.      Preliminary Statement. FRT and Telescan are parties to a
Marketing and License Agreement dated and effective September 30, 1999 (the
"Agreement") relating to, among other things, the exchange by FRT and Telescan
of certain technology licenses. FRT and Telescan have experienced a delay in
launching certain applications utilizing the licensed technology, and desire to
extend the terms of such licenses. This Amendment No. 1 sets forth certain
modifications to the Agreement to be effective as of March 2, 2000.

        2.      Amendments. The provisions of the Agreement are amended as
follows:

A.      Section 10(d) of the Agreement (Term) is modified by revising the first
sentence thereof and adding a sentence immediately after such revision to read
in the following manner:

The initial term of this Agreement will take effect on the date hereof and
unless terminated earlier pursuant to this Agreement, will terminate on June 30,
2002 (the "Initial Term"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Initial Term for
Sections 3, 4, S, 6 and 8 of the Agreement will terminate on September 30, 2001.

The remainder of Section 10(d) shall remain unchanged, and references to the
Initial Term shall apply to the applicable term for the relevant section(s) of
the Agreement.

        3.      Effect of Amendment. This Amendment will be effective on and
after March 2, 2000. All other provisions of the Agreement will remain in full
force and effect as originally written.

<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>
FRT:                                           Telescan:
FREEREALTIME.COM, INC.                         TELESCAN, INC.

By: /s/ BRAD G. GUNN                           By: /s/ ROGER C. WADSWORTH
    ----------------------------                   ----------------------------

Printed Name: Brad G. Gunn                     Printed Name: Roger C. Wadsworth
              ------------------                             ------------------

Title: PRESIDENT & CO-CEO                      Title: Senior V.P.
       -------------------------                      -------------------------

Date: 06/07/2000                               Date: 06/6/00
      --------------------------                     --------------------------

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Treaty Room

Washington, D.C.

February 13, 2023

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**  Well, good afternoon, everyone.  It’s a great pleasure to have Foreign Minister Rasmussen here today at the State Department in Washington.  Denmark and the United States are the closest of partners, of allies.  We are working together on regional challenges, on global challenges, and for the United States, the strength and depth of the partnership could not be more appreciated.  Especially in challenging times, the most important thing, I think, for both of us is the closeness of the partnership and the work we’re doing together.

We see that, of course, in Ukraine and in our strong common defense in supporting the Ukrainian people and making sure that they have what they need to deal with the aggression from Russia, and we see it in a whole diversity of areas, including, for example, on green technology, where both of our countries are leaders and there’s more and more that we’re doing together.

I was especially eager, Mr. Minister, to get a chance to see you today, particularly to hear about the priorities of the new government.  We congratulate you.  I congratulate you on being, as we would say, a glutton for punishment – (laughter) – coming back into leadership.  But grateful to have you as a partner.

**FOREIGN MINISTER RASMUSSEN:**  Thank you so much, and it’s an honor to be back, and I’m so pleased that you received me so soon after my appointment as minister of foreign affairs.  It’s nice to be back in Washington, D.C. in an official capacity.  As you just stated, we have excellent bilateral relations.  And I mean, if the only problem the world should solve are the problems between us, it will be an easy job.  (Laughter.)  But I realize that you have a much – tough job.  But we look eye to eye on so many things, and I really appreciate our close cooperation in trade, security, green transition – where I admire what you guys are going to do with this country.  So I’m looking forward to our cooperation, and I hope this will not be my last visit.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**  Absolutely not.  Thank you.

**FOREIGN MINISTER RASMUSSEN:**Thank you.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDenmarkGlobal HealthOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top