alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2722

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow additional transit systems 

greater flexibility with certain mass transportation projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2003

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. OTTER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BURGESS, Ms. 

HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. ENGLISH, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. 

GILCHREST, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. 

HOSTETTLER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. BEREUTER, 

Mr. SIMPSON, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow additional 

transit systems greater flexibility with certain mass 

transportation projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transit System Flexi5 bility Protection Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2722 IH 

1 SEC. 2. GENERAL AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 5307(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘200,000.’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘360,000. The Secretary may make grants under this sec5 tion to a transit system to finance the operating cost of 

6 equipment and facilities for use in mass transportation in 

7 an urbanized area with a population of more than 360,000 

8 if such transit system operates less than 100 buses on 

9 fixed route service during peak service hours.’’.

Æ
#### § 1249.11 Maintenance of Enterprise Securities.

An Enterprise Security may be maintained in the form of a Definitive Enterprise Security or a Book-entry Enterprise Security. A Book-entry Enterprise Security shall be maintained in the Book-entry System.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal Management, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Robert C. Larry
-------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
February 2, 2005

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1408.5 Responsibility for collection. ( a ) The collection of claims shall be aggressively pursued in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, the joint regulations issued under that Act, and these regulations. Debts owed to the United States, together with charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs, should be collected in one lump sum unless otherwise provided by law. If a debtor requests installment payments, the debtor, as requested by the Corporation, shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the debtor is unable to pay the debt in one lump sum. When appropriate, the Corporation shall arrange an installment payment schedule. Claims which cannot be collected directly or by administrative offset shall be either written off as administratively uncollectible or referred to the General Counsel for further consideration.
( b ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may compromise claims for money or property arising out of the activities of the Corporation, where the claim (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs) does not exceed $100,000. When the claim exceeds $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs), the authority to accept a compromise rests solely with the Department of Justice. The standards governing the compromise of claims are set forth in 4 CFR part 103.
( c ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may suspend or terminate the collection of claims which do not exceed $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs) after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections. If, after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections, a claim exceeds $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs), the authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with the Department of Justice. The standards governing the suspension or termination of claim collections are set forth in 4 CFR part 104.
( d ) The Corporation shall refer claims to the Department of Justice for litigation or to the General Accounting Office (GAO) for claims arising from audit exceptions taken by the GAO to payments made by the Corporation in accordance with 4 CFR part 105.
§ 19.32 Prehearing submissions. ( a ) *Party prehearing submissions.* Within the time set by the ALJ, but in no case later than 20 days before the start of the hearing, each party must file with the ALJ and serve on every other party: ( 1 ) A prehearing statement that states: ( i ) The party's position with respect to the legal issues presented;
( ii ) The statutory and case law upon which the party relies; and
( iii ) The facts that the party expects to prove at the hearing;
( 2 ) A final list of witnesses to be called to testify at the hearing, including the name, mailing address, and electronic mail address of each witness and a short summary of the expected testimony of each witness, which need not identify the exhibits to be relied upon by each witness at the hearing;
( 3 ) A list of the exhibits expected to be introduced at the hearing along with a copy of each exhibit; and
( 4 ) Stipulations of fact, if any.
( b ) *Effect of failure to comply.* No witness may testify and no exhibits may be introduced at the hearing if such witness or exhibit is not listed in the prehearing submissions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, except for good cause shown.
# C_2004148EN.01000601.xml

| 3.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/6

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 (3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2004/C 148/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that the notified measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61 (1) of the EEA Agreement

| Date of adoption: | 18 February 2004 |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State: | Norway |
| Aid No: | SAM 030.500.052 |
| Title: | Notification of the sale of Tjuvholmen |
| Objective: | Sale of Tjuvholmen from the City of Oslo, Oslo Port Authority, to Selmer Gruppen AS / Aspelin-Ramm Gruppen AS. |
| Legal basis: | Article 61 of the EEA Agreement |
| Budget/ Duration: | n.a. |

Date of adoption:

Date of adoption:

18 February 2004

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Norway

Aid No:

Aid No:

SAM 030.500.052

Title:

Title:

Notification of the sale of Tjuvholmen

Objective:

Objective:

Sale of Tjuvholmen from the City of Oslo, Oslo Port Authority, to Selmer Gruppen AS / Aspelin-Ramm Gruppen AS.

Legal basis:

Legal basis:

Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

Budget/ Duration:

Budget/ Duration:

n.a.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2794

To authorize the transfer of the U.S.S. Narwhal to the National Submarine 

Science Discovery Center in Newport, Kentucky. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2003

Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To authorize the transfer of the U.S.S. Narwhal to the 

National Submarine Science Discovery Center in Newport, Kentucky.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF U.S.S. NARWHAL TO THE NA4 TIONAL SUBMARINE SCIENCE DISCOVERY 

5 CENTER IN NEWPORT, KENTUCKY. 

6 (a) TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the Navy shall 

7 transfer the U.S.S. Narwhal (SSN–671) to the National 

8 Submarine Science Discovery Center in Newport, Ken9 tucky, in accordance with this section and upon satisfac10 tory completion of a ship donation application. Before 
2

•HR 2794 IH 

1 making such transfer, the Secretary shall remove from the 

2 vessel the reactor compartment and other classified and 

3 sensitive military equipment. 

4 (b) FUNDING.—As provided in section 7306(c) of 

5 title 10, United States Code, the transfer of the vessel au6 thorized by this section shall be made at no cost to the 

7 United States (beyond the cost which the United States 

8 would otherwise incur for dismantling and recycling of the 

9 vessel). 

10 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The transfer under this sec11 tion is subject to subsection (b) of section 7306 of title 

12 10, United States Code, but is not subject to subsection 

13 (d) of that section. 

14 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

15 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi16 tions in connection with the transfers required by sub17 section (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                790,874
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         116,354
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                                13,493,552           <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,984,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        11,191,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                               8,656,414            <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              2,287,827            <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          11,191,162
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,131,757            <F4>
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         519,553              <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    428,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          184,100
<EPS-BASIC>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Walter and Frank Prestoff, Executors (Estate of Eva Prestoff) *v.*William Slipkowski.

Maltbie, C. J., Avert, Brown, Jennings and Ells, Js.

Argued November 7

decided November 26, 1940.

*M. F. Stempien,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Edward W. Broder*appeared for the appellee (defendant),

but, at the suggestion of the court, did not argue the cause.

*714Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs, as executors of the estate of their mother, Eva Prestoff, brought this action to recover from the defendant, the husband of the deceased’s sister, upon an alleged loan of $1000 by the deceased to him. The trial court has found the following facts: About six months before she died, the deceased, at her request, was taken in an automobile by the defendant and his wife to a point at the curb in front of a savings bank in which she had a deposit. As she could walk only with very great difficulty, the treasurer of the bank came to the car. She informed him that she wished to withdraw $1000. The necessary formalities being complied with, he brought her a check to her order for that amount. She then stated that she wished cash. He told her that if she would indorse the check, the defendant could cash it at a nearby national bank. Accordingly she indorsed it by her mark, witnessed by the treasurer, and the defendant took it to the national bank where he indorsed it and received $1000 in cash. He returned to the automobile and gave the money to the deceased.. She did not give the money to him nor did he ever borrow it from her. Upon these findings, the only possible judgment was that rendered by the trial court, for the defendant. The plaintiffs in the appeal *do*not attack the finding as made, but seek to have added to it a paragraph to the effect that three days before her death the deceased told them that she had loaned $1000 to the defendant and instructed them to collect it. Only one of the plaintiffs testified to such a statement, although he stated that the other was present at the time; and this, with other circumstances, might well have led the trial court to question whether such a statement had been made. But, even if it had been, this would not suffice to overturn the finding, because it would be but evidence, to be weighed with the other evidence in the *715case, and this the trial court believed sufficient to establish that no loan had been made.

There is no error.
#### § 1805.807 Lobbying restrictions.

No assistance made available under this part may be expended by a Recipient to pay any person to influence or attempt to influence any agency, elected official, officer or employee of a State or local government in connection with the making, award, extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any State or local government contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement as such terms are defined in 31 U.S.C. 1352.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

KENNETH LEE, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE 

AND MICHAEL POTTEIGER, 

CHAIRMAN, COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE, 

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 WAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of Commonwealth 

Court dated February 20, 2014, at No. 629 

MD 2013. 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, the order of the Commonwealth Court 

is hereby AFFIRMED.
§ 19.214 Further proceedings. ( a ) *Process for requesting further proceedings or additional information.* At the request of either the applicant or Enforcement Counsel, or on the presiding officer's own initiative, the presiding officer may, if necessary for a full and fair decision on the application, order the filing of additional written submissions; hold an informal conference or oral argument; or allow for discovery or hold an evidentiary hearing with respect to issues other than whether the OCC's position was substantially justified (such as those involving the applicant's eligibility or substantiation of fees or expenses). Any written submissions must be made, oral argument held, discovery conducted, and evidentiary hearing held as promptly as possible so as not to delay a decision on the application for fees.
( b ) *Requirement to identify additional information sought and reason for requesting additional proceedings.* A request for further proceedings under this section must specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and must explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
# C_2007266EN.01000601.xml

| 8.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/6

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

(2007/C 266/04)

| Date of adoption | : | 24 April 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Aid No | : | 61274 |
| Title | : | Regional direct transport aid scheme |
| Objective | : | The objective of the scheme is to offset competitive disadvantages resulting from extra transport costs for firms located in peripheral areas and within sparsely populated regions and thus situated long distances away from their markets. |
| Legal basis | : | The legal basis for the scheme can be found in the State aid guidelines on National regional aid 2007-2013, National guidelines for regional transport aid (‘Nasjonale retningslinjer for regional transportstøtte (Ytre rammeverk)’) and in the State budget for 2007 (St.prp. nr. 1 (2006-2007) Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet). |
| Budget/Duration | : | The annual budget of the scheme will not exceed NOK 70 million (approximately EUR 9 million). The duration of the scheme is from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2013. |

Date of adoption

:

24 April 2007

EFTA State

:

Norway

Aid No

:

61274

Title

:

Regional direct transport aid scheme

Objective

:

The objective of the scheme is to offset competitive disadvantages resulting from extra transport costs for firms located in peripheral areas and within sparsely populated regions and thus situated long distances away from their markets.

Legal basis

:

The legal basis for the scheme can be found in the State aid guidelines on National regional aid 2007-2013, National guidelines for regional transport aid (‘Nasjonale retningslinjer for regional transportstøtte (Ytre rammeverk)’) and in the State budget for 2007 (St.prp. nr. 1 (2006-2007) Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet).

Budget/Duration

:

The annual budget of the scheme will not exceed NOK 70 million (approximately EUR 9 million). The duration of the scheme is from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2013.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry

---
42512.

#### FRANKLIN COUNTY v. PAYNE.

*Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 3, 1967

Decided January 18, 1967.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, E. J. Summerour, Marshall R. Sims, Assistant Attorneys General, L. Clifford Adams, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, J. Patrick Ward,*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Hill, Jr., Carter Goode,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

“A general appearance by answering a petition waives all irregularities in the service of process.” *Hagins v. Howell,*219 Ga. 276 (1) (133 SE2d 8); *Code*§ 81-209. Accordingly, when the defendant county appeared and answered and demurred to the plaintiff landowner’s petition for damages for diminution of the fair market value of his land by the construction of landfills in the building of a highway, it thereby waived the non-compliance, if any, of the service of process with the requirement of *Code*§ 23-1503 (Ga. L. 1872, p. 39); therefore, the court did not err in its judgment overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition on this ground, made subsequently to its general appearance.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2022437EN.01000201.xml

| 17.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 November 2022

(2022/C 437/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0412 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87483 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8754 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9795 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3675 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,355 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 408,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7065 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9206 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,3783 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5400 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3801 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1444 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6897 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4250 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 378,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0195 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3720 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5443 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 248,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7323 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,678 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,103 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5438 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1227 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,5905 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0412

JPY

Japanese yen

145,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87483

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8754

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9795

ISK

Iceland króna

148,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3675

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,355

HUF

Hungarian forint

408,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7065

RON

Romanian leu

4,9206

TRY

Turkish lira

19,3783

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5400

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3801

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1444

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6897

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4250

KRW

South Korean won

1 378,10

ZAR

South African rand

18,0195

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3720

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5443

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 248,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7323

PHP

Philippine peso

59,678

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,103

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5438

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1227

INR

Indian rupee

84,5905

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 79 FR 61539, Oct. 10, 2014.

§ 249.101 Determining maturity. For purposes of calculating its net stable funding ratio, including its ASF amount and RSF amount, under subparts K through N, a Board-regulated institution shall assume each of the following: ( a ) With respect to any NSFR liability, the NSFR liability matures according to § 249.31(a)(1) of this part without regard to whether the NSFR liability is subject to § 249.32;
( b ) With respect to an asset, the asset matures according to § 249.31(a)(2) of this part without regard to whether the asset is subject to § 249.33 of this part;
( c ) With respect to an NSFR liability or asset that is perpetual, the NSFR liability or asset matures one year or more after the calculation date;
( d ) With respect to an NSFR liability or asset that has an open maturity, the NSFR liability or asset matures on the first calendar day after the calculation date, except that in the case of a deferred tax liability, the NSFR liability matures on the first calendar day after the calculation date on which the deferred tax liability could be realized; and
( e ) With respect to any principal payment of an NSFR liability or asset, such as an amortizing loan, that is due prior to the maturity of the NSFR liability or asset, the payment matures on the date on which it is contractually due.