alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-10-00094-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADAM EARLEYWINE A/K/A

ADAM CHRISTOPHER EARLEYWINE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Adam Earleywine a/k/a Adam Christopher Earleywine, attempts to appeal

his conviction for harassment by certain persons in a correctional facility. See TEX.PENAL
2

CODE ANN. § 22.11 (Vernon Supp. 2009). The trial court has certified that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On March 17, 2010, this Court notified appellant’s counsel that the trial court’s

certification failed to show the right to appeal and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record;

(2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by

letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively,

advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On January 30, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. Counsel has also informed the Court that

appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal; that appellant has been released from

prison; and that counsel is unable to locate appellant. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any and all pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

5th day of August, 2010.
H. R. 2912

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Tribe to determine its

membership and form of government.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE OSAGE

TRIBE.

(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows:

(1) The Osage Tribe is a federally recognized tribe based

in Pawhuska, Oklahoma.

(2) The Osage Allotment Act of June 28, 1906 (34 Stat.

539), states that the ‘‘legal membership’’ of the Osage Tribe

includes the persons on the January 1, 1906 roll and their

children, and that each ‘‘member’’ on that roll is entitled to

a headright share in the distribution of funds from the Osage

mineral estate and an allotment of the surface lands of the

Osage Reservation.

(3) Today only Osage Indians who have a headright share

in the mineral estate are ‘‘members’’ of the Osage Tribe.

(4) Adult Osage Indians without a headright interest cannot

vote in Osage government elections and are not eligible to

seek elective office in the Osage Tribe as a matter of Federal

law.

(5) A principal goal of Federal Indian policy is to promote

tribal self-sufficiency and strong tribal government.

(b) REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE OSAGE TRIBE.—

(1) MEMBERSHIP.—Congress hereby clarifies that the term

‘‘legal membership’’ in section 1 of the Act entitled, ‘‘An Act

For the division of lands and funds of the Osage Indians in

Oklahoma Territory, and for other purposes’’, approved June

28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539), means the persons eligible for allotments of Osage Reservation lands and a pro rata share of

the Osage mineral estate as provided in that Act, not membership in the Osage Tribe for all purposes. Congress hereby

reaffirms the inherent sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to

determine its own membership, provided that the rights of

any person to Osage mineral estate shares are not diminished

thereby.

(2) GOVERNMENT.—Notwithstanding section 9 of the Act

entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of lands and funds of the

Osage Indians in Oklahoma Territory, and for other purposes’’,

approved June 28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539), Congress hereby

reaffirms the inherent sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to

determine its own form of government.
H. R. 2912—2

(3) ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA.—At the request of the

Osage Tribe, the Secretary of the Interior shall assist the

Osage Tribe with conducting elections and referenda to implement this section.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1952
TOJUANNA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS DOLLAR, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-122) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tojuanna Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tojuanna Brown appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We find that the district court correctly dismissed the action on the ground that Brown failed to timely exhaust her administrative remedies by contacting an EEO counselor within forty-five days of the alleged discriminatory event. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a) (2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. SeeBrown v. Dollar , No. CA-04-122 (E.D. Va. filed June 1, 2004 & entered June 2, 2004) (dismissing for the reasons stated from the bench). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Selected
Financial Data" in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended January
31, 2001 and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-11598) pertaining to the 1990 Share Option Scheme,
the 1997 Share Option Scheme, the 1998 Directors and Consultants Option Scheme,
the 1999 Employee Savings Related Share Option Scheme and the 1999 U.S.
Employee Share Purchase Plan of Trintech Group PLC of our report dated February
26, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Trintech
Group PLC included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended January
31, 2001.

                                          /S/ ERNST & YOUNG

Dublin, Ireland
May 15, 2001
# C_2023274EN.01000401.xml

| 3.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 August 2023

(2023/C 274/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0985 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4518 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86038 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6810 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9642 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,1615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,929 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 386,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4475 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9341 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,6214 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6691 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4621 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5679 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7961 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4693 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 422,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1579 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8829 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 675,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9916 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,603 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,651 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2561 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5252 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,6750 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0985

JPY

Japanese yen

156,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4518

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86038

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6810

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9642

ISK

Iceland króna

144,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,1615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,929

HUF

Hungarian forint

386,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4475

RON

Romanian leu

4,9341

TRY

Turkish lira

29,6214

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6691

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4621

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5679

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7961

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4693

KRW

South Korean won

1 422,77

ZAR

South African rand

20,1579

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8829

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 675,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9916

PHP

Philippine peso

60,603

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,651

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2561

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5252

INR

Indian rupee

90,6750

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
[FRONTLINE.NET LETTERHEAD]


June 20, 2000


Mike Brown, President
DelaNet, Inc.
262 Quigley Boulevard
New Castle, DE 19720


              Re:    Side Letter re: Bank Account and Accounts Receivable

Dear Mike:

     The purpose of this Side Letter is to set forth the parties' agreement with
regard to certain post-closing obligations. Pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Asset
Purchase   Agreement   dated  June  20,   2000  (the   "Agreement"),   Frontline
Communications  Corp. (the "Purchaser") is acquiring the accounts  receivable of
DelaNet,  Inc.  (the  "Seller")  as well as the  cash  balance  of the  Seller's
Pennsville National Bank Account Number 21-855-3 (the "Bank Account").

     Subsequent to the Closing Date (i.e,  June 20, 2000) the Seller agrees that
it shall not,  without the prior written consent of the Purchaser,  withdraw any
funds from the Bank Account.  Seller  further  agrees that it shall  continue to
collect  accounts  receivable and shall promptly deposit all sums collected into
the Bank Account.  Seller shall provide  Purchaser  with reports  reflecting all
amounts  collected not less than once per week until control of the Bank Account
has been transferred to Purchaser.

<PAGE>


o Page 2                                                            July 5, 2000


     If the foregoing reflects your  understanding,  please execute below. Thank
you.


                                        Sincerely,



                                        Amy Wagner-Mele
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        and General Counsel

AGREED TO THIS ____
DAY OF JUNE, 2000


-----------------------
DELANET, INC.

AWM/mmw
+A,A-201C- OCS::;2

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircrafl Association Eli Cotti Iz.}..;m ~

Regional Airline Association Dave Lolterl-r

17./4/09 -

Aircraft Owners & Pilou Associstioll Robert Hadt.man )2)'1/0'1 -

ATA I ~aig Fabian

~/ IZjc;jrfl -,.nP 7 -

I
# Official Journal L 167/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.167.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 167 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5425 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.167.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 167

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5425 June 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and amending Annexes I and III to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and amending Annexes I and III to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 263.105 Statement of net worth. ( a ) *General rule.* A statement of net worth shall be filed with the application for an award of fees. The statement shall reflect the net worth of the applicant and all affiliates of the applicant, as specified in § 263.103(c)(5). In all cases, the administrative law judge or the Board may call for additional information needed to establish the applicant's net worth as of the initiation of the proceeding.
( b ) *Contents.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise provided herein, the statement of net worth may be in any form convenient to the applicant which fully discloses all the assets and liabilities of the applicant and all the assets and liabilities of its affiliates, as of the time of the initiation of the adversary adjudication. Unaudited financial statements are acceptable for individual applicants as long as the statement provides a reliable basis for evaluation, unless the administrative law judge or the Board otherwise requires. Financial statements or reports filed with or reported to a Federal or State agency, prepared before the initiation of the adversary proceeding for other purposes, and accurate as of a date not more than three months prior to the initiation of the proceeding, shall be acceptable in establishing net worth as of the time of the initiation of the proceeding, unless the administrative law judge or the Board otherwise requires.
( 2 ) In the case of applicants or affiliates that are not banks, net worth shall be considered for the purposes of this subpart to be the excess of total assets over total liabilities, as of the date the underlying proceeding was initiated, except as adjusted under § 263.103(c)(5). The net worth of a bank holding company or a savings and loan holding company shall be considered on a consolidated basis. Assets and liabilities of individuals shall include those beneficially owned.
( 3 ) If the applicant or any of its affiliates is a bank or a savings association, the portion of the statement of net worth which relates to the bank or the savings association shall consist of a copy of the bank's or a savings association's last Consolidated Report of Condition and Income filed before the initiation of the adversary adjudication. Net worth shall be considered for the purposes of this subpart to be the total equity capital (or, in the case of mutual savings banks or mutual savings associations, the total surplus accounts) as reported, in conformity with applicable instructions and guidelines, on the bank's or the savings association's Consolidated Report of Condition and Income filed for the last reporting date before the initiation of the proceeding.
( c ) *Statement confidential.* Unless otherwise ordered by the Board or required by law, the statement of net worth shall be for the confidential use of the Board, counsel for the Board, and the administrative law judge.
[56 FR 38052, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 56605, Sept. 13, 2011]
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, **Ingrid Wiik**, Chief Executive Officer of Alpharma Inc., certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alpharma Inc.;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

		(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

		(b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

		(c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

	5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

		(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
# L_2011078EN.01005701.xml

| 24.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/57

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES

No 5/2010/SC

of 9 December 2010

amending Decision of the Standing Committee No 4/2004/SC establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014,

Having regard to Protocol 38b on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the aforementioned Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014,

Having regard to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014,

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2004/SC of 3 June 2004 establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee (1),

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 1/2010/SC of 28 January 2010 establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2009-2014 (2),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In Article 1 of Decision No 4/2004/SC the second sentence of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following wording:

‘The Committee shall manage the EEA Financial Mechanism 2004-2009 and the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.’

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2010.

For the Standing Committee

The Chairman

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

The Secretary-General

Kåre BRYN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 52, 23.2.2006, p. 54.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 53, 4.3.2010, p. 19.

2

---
IB 

House Calendar No. 29

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

[Report No. 108–84] 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. HOBSON (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. CHABOT, 

Mr. GILLMOR, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. 

LATOURETTE, Mr. NEY, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, 

Mr. REGULA, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, and Mr. 

TURNER of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 1, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building and United States 

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 281 RH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building 

5 and United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tony 

11 Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

House Calendar No. 29

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

[Report No. 108–84] 

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United 

States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

MAY 1, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed