alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010298EN.01000701.xml

| 4.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/7

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 298/05

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 21 June 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 67159 |
| Decision number | : | 253/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Rescue aid scheme involving settlement of claims owned by the Central Bank of Iceland on savings banks |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(b) EEA |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | : | Settlement of claims |
| Budget | : | ISK 9,345 million |
| Duration | : | The scheme has been temporarily approved until 21 December 2010 |
| Economic sectors | : | Financial sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Finance |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 150 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

21 June 2010

Case number

:

67159

Decision number

:

253/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Rescue aid scheme involving settlement of claims owned by the Central Bank of Iceland on savings banks

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(b) EEA

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Remedy a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

:

Settlement of claims

Budget

:

ISK 9,345 million

Duration

:

The scheme has been temporarily approved until 21 December 2010

Economic sectors

:

Financial sector

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Finance

Arnarhvoli

150 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
The DII Group, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos.
33-73556, 33-90572, 33-79940, 333-10999, 333-11001, 333-11005 and 333-11007 on
Form S-8, and No. 33-80175 on Form S-3 of The DII Group, Inc. of our reports
dated January 28, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows of the DII Group, Inc. for the 52 weeks
ended December 29, 1996 and related schedule, which reports appear in the 1998
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The DII Group, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 17, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51659-51660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer 
Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, November 10, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marisa Knispel. For more information please

[[Page 51660]]

contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP 
Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or 
contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-24103 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-Q for The Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane
Investment Corporation, the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund. L.P.,
that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the fnancial condition and results of operations of The
Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.



/s/ Robert L. Lerner
----------------------
Robert L. Lerner
President of Ruvane Investment Corporation,
the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund, L.P.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10775 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LESLIE NASHON SLATON, also known as Leslie Nashon Slayton , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 51

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leslie Nashon
Slaton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Slaton h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 16, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10775 Document: 00513118458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/16/2015No. 14

- 10775

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-10775 Document: 00513118458 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/16/2015
Parent company name: GE 

Motors subsidiary: Regal-Beloit 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: N/A 

Contact position: N/A 

Motor model: ICE 59 

Attachment: ICE59Release.pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; this motor is 1/15 hp and uses line voltage (nominally 115 V). 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes. 
Parent company name: Minebea 

Motors subsidiary: NMB Tech 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: Irvine Sloan 

Contact position: Program Manager 

Motor model(s): BLDC40, BLDC65 

Attachment(s): BLDC_motor_details.pdf, BLDC40SG.pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; these motors range from 0.025 to 0.26 hp and 12 to 48 V supply voltage. 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes. 
Parent company name: Ametek 

Motors subsidiary: Pittman 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: Lou Tecsi 

Contact position: Engineering Department 

Motor model(s): 2.5” Series, 3.55” Series, 5.25” Series 

Attachment(s): 2%2e5 BLDC Motor[1].pdf, 3%2e55 BLDC Motor[1].pdf, 5%2e25 BLDC 

Motor[1].pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; these motors range from 0.068 to 0.59 hp and from 24 to 27.6 V supply voltage. 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes.
§ 218.780 Exemption for banks from liability under section 29 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ( a ) No contract entered into before March 31, 2009, shall be void or considered voidable by reason of section 29(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78cc(b)) because any bank that is a party to the contract violated the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(a)), any other applicable provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder based solely on the bank's status as a broker when the contract was created.
( b ) No contract shall be void or considered voidable by reason of section 29(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78cc(b)) because any bank that is a party to the contract violated the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(a)) or the rules and regulations thereunder based solely on the bank's status as a broker when the contract was created, if: ( 1 ) At the time the contract was created, the bank acted in good faith and had reasonable policies and procedures in place to comply with section 3(a)(4)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)(B)) and the rules and regulations thereunder; and
( 2 ) At the time the contract was created, any violation of the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act by the bank did not result in any significant harm or financial loss or cost to the person seeking to void the contract.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-17299) of OPTi, Inc. of our report, dated June 29, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of OPTi, Inc., as of March 31, 2011 and2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the March 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of OPTi, Inc. 

/s/ ARMANINO McKENNA LLP 

San Ramon, California 

June 29, 2011
§ 251.6 Reporting requirements. By March 31 of each year: ( a ) A U.S. financial company (other than a U.S. financial company that is required to file the Bank Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report), the Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9C), the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP), or the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Holding Companies (FR Y-9LP), or is required to report consolidated total liabilities on the Quarterly Savings and Loan Holding Company Report (FR 2320)) must report to the Board its consolidated liabilities as of the previous calendar year-end in the manner and form prescribed by the Board; and
( b ) A foreign financial company (other than a foreign financial company that is required to file a FR Y-7) must report to the Board its U.S. liabilities as of the previous calendar year-end in the manner and form prescribed by the Board.
Order entered June 10, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01084-CV

ALFREDO SANCHEZ AND FERMIN LOPEZ, Appellants

V.

LUIS TORRES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-03653

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ June 7, 2021 third motion seeking a thirtyday extension of time to file their brief on the merits. In our May 3, 2021 order 

granting appellants’ second extension motion, we cautioned them that further 

extension requests would be strongly disfavored. Accordingly, we GRANT the 

motion ONLY TO THE EXTENT that we extend the time to June 18, 2021. No 

further extension will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                                                                              |                                 |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                                                                                   |
|                          |                                                                                                                         | /s/ SCOTT                KINCER |
|                          | Scott                Kincer*President                and Chief Executive Officer and**Principal                Financial Officer* |
|                          |                                                                                                                              |
| March                28, 2008 |

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51319-51320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 701-TA-461 (Final)]


Ni-Resist Piston Inserts From Korea

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 21, 2009, the Department of Commerce published 
notice in the Federal Register of a negative final determination of 
subsidies in connection with the subject investigation (Ni-Resist 
Piston Inserts from the Republic of Korea: Final Negative 
Countervailing Duty Determination, 74 FR 48059, September 21, 2009). 
Accordingly, pursuant to section 207.40(a) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.40(a)), the countervailing duty 
investigation concerning Ni-resist piston inserts from Korea 
(investigation No. 701-TA-461 (Final)) is terminated.
    DATES: Effective Date: September 21, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela M. W. Newell (202-708-5409),

[[Page 51320]]

Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record 
for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic 
docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

    Authority:  This investigation is being terminated under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 
CFR 201.10).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 30, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-23990 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SUBMITTAL 

Planning Area: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – 

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions 

Enclosed Notes 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee X See ARB Executive Order S-09-006. 

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X 

See San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control District Board Resolution 

#09-04-12. 

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executive Order S-09-006. 

2.1(d) Copy of : 

a. Attainment Plan 

b: Contingency Measures 

Not applicable 

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements X 

See San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control District Board Resolution 

#09-04-12. as certified by Board Clerk 

and ARB Executive Order S-09-006. 

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 X See attachment 2 of the District submittal. 

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice X 

See San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control District Board Resolution 

#09-04-12.

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses 

See Appendix A of the San Joaquin 

Valley Air Pollution Control District 

Staff Report. 

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable. 

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status Not applicable. 

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable. 

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

Not applicable. 

2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
# C_2018466EN.01003001.xml

| 28.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/30

---

Corrigendum to Judgment of the Court of 17 September 2018 in Case E-10/17 Nye Kystlink AS Color Group AS and Color Line AS (Article 53 EEA — Article 54 EEA — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — National rules on the limitation period for claims for damages)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 459 of 20 December 2018
  )

(2018/C 466/15)

On page 47, and on the cover, in the title:

for:

‘Nye Kystlink AS Color Group AS and Color Line AS’,

read:

read:

‘Nye Kystlink AS v Color Group AS and Color Line AS’.

---
§ 269b.112 Contents of the charge. A charge shall contain the following: ( a ) The full name, address, and telephone number of the person, bank, or labor organization making the charge (hereinafter referred to as the charging party) and of the person signing the charge who shall state also his relation to or his capacity with the complainant. Where discrimination is alleged, all known discriminatees shall be named;
( b ) The name, address, and telephone number of the bank or labor organization against whom the charge is made (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) and of any parties in interest;
( c ) A clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practice, including the time and place of occurrence of the particular acts, and a statement of the portion or portions of the policy alleged to have been violated. A charge shall not incorporate by reference affidavits or other documents submitted in support of the charge;
( d ) A statement of the relief sought;
( e ) A statement of any other remedies invoked for the redress of the alleged violations of the policy and the results, if any, of their invocation. If the issue in such charge is subject to an established grievance procedure, the complainant must irrevocably elect, prior to the completion of the first applicable step of the grievance procedure, whether he will invoke the grievance procedure or whether he will invoke the unfair labor practice procedures of the panel. A charge which is withdrawn or rejected by the panel as defective prior to the institution of any formal proceedings by the panel shall not prejudice the filing of a grievance on the same matter, unless the parties otherwise so provide;
( f ) A declaration by the person signing the charge, that its contents are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, such declaration to be subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Criminal Code (18 U.S.C. 1001).
###### Editorial Note on Part 220

#### Editorial Note:

A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

#### §§ 220.125-220.126 [Reserved]
#### § 264.101 Cross-reference to employees' ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Employees of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) are subject to the executive branch-wide standards of ethical conduct at 5 CFR part 2635 and the Board's regulation at 5 CFR part 6801, which supplements the executive branch-wide standards, and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulation at 5 CFR part 2634.

[61 FR 53830, Oct. 16, 1996]