alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022409EN.01001401.xml

| 25.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/14

---

Publication of a vacancy for a Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board at grade AD 14 (Principal Adviser)

Secretariat-General

Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants

COM/2022/10418

(2022/C 409/10)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2022/10418) to establish a shortlist of suitable candidates to take up duties as Principal Adviser – Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board in the Secretariat-General (grade AD 14).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website:

| | https://europa.eu/!nFCdbF |
| --- | --- |

https://europa.eu/!nFCdbF

---
### RE: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on ozone secondary standard ? King, Heidi R. to: Ron Evans, Thomas.Grahame 11/09/2009 01:47 PM Cc: Amy Lamson, Tricia Crabtree
Ron, that's a generous offer, but OMB isn't allowed to outsource coordination of review. This RIA chapter has already been distributed to all interagency reviewers along with the draft rule, so I suspect that Tom seeks something else. Tom, if you could describe as specifically as possible what you are looking for, we'll work on getting a response. Best, heidi -----Original Message----- From: Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:38 PM To: Thomas.Grahame@HQ.DOE.GOV Cc: King, Heidi R.; Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Fw: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on ozone secondary standard? Tom, Amy forwarded your request to me. She has provided me with information you have requested which I am forwarding here. Please let us know if you have any questions based on this. In the future, please send any requests you have about the RIAs thru me, I will make sure you get information you need. I realize this was a special request based on Amy's statement during the meeting, no harm done.

Ron Evans Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA Mail Drop C-439-02 919-541-5488 919-541-0839 fax Attached is the requested document. The relevant sections are S4-2 through S4-7. (See attached file: S4-Supplemental Analysis- Secondary Standard 10.15.09.docx) ----- Forwarded by Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/09/2009 01:22 PM -----
From: "Grahame, Thomas" <Thomas.Grahame@HQ.DOE.GOV>To: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/09/2009 01:13 PM

Subject: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on ozone secondary standard?

Amy, this would save me time, if you could do me the favor of sending me the document, and telling me where to look for the county info?
Thanks,

Tom
Thomas J. Grahame
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585
202 586 7149 (voice)
202 586 7085 (fax)
42398.

#### SNYDER v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*

Argued November 8, 1966

Decided January 30, 1967.

Pannell, Judge.

The notice required under *Code*§ 114-303 must be of an .injury by accident. Defendant’s knowledge solely of the claimant’s accident, in the absence of any indication to the employer that the accident had produced an injury is not sufficient notice that the claimant had sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. *Kresge v. Holley,*104 Ga. App. 144 (121 SE2d 182); *Royal Indem. Co. v. Coulter,*213 Ga. 277 (98 SE2d 899). There was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the full board that the claimant had not notified the employer of the injury occasioned by the accident and there was no error in denying compensation because of failure to give notice.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*112*Henritze, Baker & Bailey, Walter M. Henritze, Jr.,*for appellant. •

*Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, James B. Hiers, Jr.,*for appellees.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Natuzzi S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Amendment No. 1 to the annual report
on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                         
|------------------- | ------------------------
|Dated: July 7, 2017 | /s/ Pasquale Natuzzi    
|                    | Pasquale Natuzzi        
|                    | Chief Executive Officer 
|                    |                         
|Dated: July 7, 2017 | /s/ Vittorio Notarpietro
|                    | Vittorio Notarpietro    
|                    | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Natuzzi S.p.A. and will be retained by Natuzzi S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

The Honorable Dennis J. Hastert

Speaker of the House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

Enclosed for your infornlation is a copy of the FY 2005 Annual Report of the Overseas

Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) required by Section 203 of the Notification and

Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002, ("No FEAR Act"),

Public Law 107-174.

If I can be of further assistance please let me know.

Enclosures

1100 NEW YORK AVE.. N. W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20527, USA

OFFICE OF THE

PRESIDENT

June 16, 2006

,

. (202) 336-8401 . WASHINGTON. D. c. 20527 . FAX (202) 408-5133
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Annual Report

on the

Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002

("No FEAR Act")

Fiscal Year 2005
2
3
Equal Empk>yment Oppa'tunity Data Posted

Pursuant to the No Fear Act:

OPIC Internal Complaint Activity

D8t8 .. of September 30, 2005 - Fourth Qu.rter FY 2GOS
Commercial/Industrial Pumps ASRAC Working Group: Public Meeting and Webinar

Mar 26, 2014 08:20 AM EDT

First 

Name Last Name Email Address Phone City Industry State Organization Zip Code

Al Iseppon 293 Wright Street 262-728-7217 Delavan Manufacturing WI 53115

Prem Vuppuluri 902 Battelle Blvd 509-375-4492 Richland Energy, 

Chemical, 

Utilities

WA Pacific 

Northwest 

National 

99354

Erica Johnson 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354

David Hernandez 4620 Forest Ave. Norwood Manufacturing OH Siemens 45212

Callie Reis 77 South Bedford Street Burlington MA Navigant 02139

Jiangan Hu 6400 W. Enterprise 12625122418 Mequon Manufacturing WI 53092

Jeffrey Alascio 16250 Gledale rd 2624088978 New Berlin WI ABB, Inc 53151

Tim Schumann 1295 Old Spartanburg Lyman Manufacturing SC 29322

Daniel Stewart 6400 W. Enterprise 

Drive

262.512.2607 Mequon Manufacturing WI Rockwell 

Automation

53092

Mark Menzer 11112 Chessington Pl Reston VA 20194

Jeffrey Alascio 16250 Glendale Rd 2624088978 New Berlin Manufacturing WI ABB, Inc 53024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 96-11366

_______________________

NATIONAL HOUSING EXCHANGE, INC, a North Carolina Corporation,

Plaintiff,

DAVID J KRUPP, arf National Housing Exchange, Inc,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

NATIONAL HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation,

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellee

versus

ARAPAHO CAR WASH, A Texas General Partnership; THOMAS H STEWART;

DAVID M WARREN,

Defendants - Counter Claimants - Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

Dallas Division

_________________________________________________________________

August 8, 1997

Before JONES, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM:*

David R. Krupp, receiver for National Housing Exchange,

later replaced by National Heritage Life Insurance Company (“NHL”),
brought this suit against Arapaho Car Wash Thomas H. Stewart, and

David M. Warren (collectively, “Arapaho”) to collect on a

promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment for

NHL and subsequently denied Arapaho’s Motion to Enforce Settlement

Agreement. Arapaho argues that there was insufficient summary

judgment evidence to establish the chain of title giving NHL

ownership of the note and guarantees. Arapaho also challenges the

district court’s conclusion that the parties did not have a

settlement agreement in writing, signed and filed with the court as

required by Texas law. After hearing oral argument, reviewing the

briefs, the authorities cited therein and the record, we find no

reversible error of fact or law. Thus, we AFFIRM the judgment of

the district court.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XV Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  March 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
86-A, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
86-A,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not

constitute a part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) accompanying
this letter.

Kevin J. McAndrew, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., certifies that to my knowledge:


1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. (as of and for the periods presented in the
Report).


                             /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew
                             --------------------------------------

                                 Kevin J. McAndrew
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 3, 2005










1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Clarent Energy Services, Inc. and Graham Gilliam v. Leasing 

Ventures, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-18-00036-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-50734

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 14, 2017. The clerk’s record was 

filed February 12, 2018. Appellants have filed an unagreed motion to supplement the clerk’s 

record with documents attached to the motion. The motion is DENIED.

The motion states: “It became clear that the record was missing several documents filed 

by the parties in the days prior to the judgment and notice of appeal.” The motion provides no 

explanation why such a problem with the record was not rectified prior to the entry of judgment 

and the filing of a notice of appeal. In any case, the rules of appellate procedure provide for 

records to be certified by the trial court clerk, and there is a specific procedure for 

supplementation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c). Even an agreed clerk’s record 

must be prepared pursuant to Rule 34.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.2. To the extent appellants’ 

motion can be read to suggest that part of the clerk’s record has been lost or destroyed, the 

relevant rule should be followed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 10, 2018
---

Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Bryant, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Elephant
      & Castle Group, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by this report;

|Date: April 30, 2007 | /s/Richard Bryant            
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Chairman of the Board,       
|                     | Chief Executive Officer and  
|                     | President                    
|                     | (principal executive officer)

---
#### § 263.16 The Board's right to conduct examination.

Nothing contained in this subpart limits in any manner the right of the Board to conduct any examination, inspection, or visitation of any institution or institution-affiliated party, or the right of the Board to conduct or continue any form of investigation authorized by law.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

                    The notice “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) DNA Samples: Guidelines for Proposals to Use Samples and Cost Schedule,” was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 3rd, 2009, (Vol. 74 FR No. 170). This notice is corrected as follows:                

                    On page 45647 first column, under Public Availability of Data, the Web site should read:                     *http://www.cdc.gov/​nchs/​nhanes/​genetics/​genetic_​types.htm*.                

                    Proposals for secondary data analyses linking NHANES public use data with genetic variation data will be reviewed by the Research Data Center see:                     *http://www.cdc.gov/​nchs/​r&​d/​rdc.htm*                     for proposal guidelines.                

Dated: October 1, 2009.

James Stephens,

Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-24297 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit
      31.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      David
      P. Lieberman, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATASCENSION INC.





2.Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
      registrant and have:





a)designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this annual report is being prepared;





b)evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
      of a
      date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
      "Evaluation Date"); and





c)presented
      in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





a)all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.
      I have
      indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes
      in
      internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
      corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
      weaknesses.




Dated:
                May 13, 2008/s/
                David P. LiebermanDavid
                P. LiebermanPrincipal
                Financial Officer
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an

order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir.

R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/25/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

CALVIN BOLDING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DENNIS LEONARD, Pastor;

PASTOR DAVE,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1421

(D.C. No. 95-S-1483)

(Dist. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R.

34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
1

 The district court granted in forma pauperis status to Mr. Bolding

for appeal purposes.

-2-

Mr. Calvin Bolding filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging

that defendants, both ministers with Heritage Christian Center, violated his First

Amendment rights. The district court dismissed Mr. Bolding’s complaint

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). Mr. Bolding appeals, 1 and we affirm.

Section 1983 requires the plaintiff to “show that the defendant deprived him

of [a] constitutional right ‘under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,

custom, or usage, of any State or Territory.’ This . . . element requires that the

plaintiff show that the defendant acted ‘under color of law.’” Adickes v. S. H.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 150 (1970); see also Pino v. Higgs, 75 F.3d 1461, 1464

(10th Cir. 1996).

Mr. Bolding stated in his complaint that neither defendant acted under color

of state law. Mr. Bolding also stated in his complaint that he did not wish to

assert jurisdiction under a statute other than section 1983. On appeal, Mr.

Bolding again admits that neither defendant is a state actor. Because Mr. Bolding

failed to meet this specific requirement of section 1983, we agree with the district

court that his complaint must be dismissed. 
-3-

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. The mandate shall issue

forthwith.

SUBMITTED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge