alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS

**TITLE PAGE** 

**DOCUMENT LIST** 

**ACRONYMS AND**  **ABBREVIATIONS**

CHAPTERS

**CHAPTER 1.**  **INTRODUCTION**

**CHAPTER 2.**  **ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK** 

**CHAPTER 3.**  **MARKET AND**  **TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT** 

**CHAPTER 4.**  **SCREENING ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 5.**  **ENGINEERING ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 6.**  **MARKUPS FOR**  **EQUIPMENT PRICE**  **DETERMINATION**

**CHAPTER 7.**  **ENERGY USE**  **CHARACTERIZATION**

**CHAPTER 8.**  **LIFE­CYCLE COST**  **AND PAYBACK**  **PERIOD ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 9.**  **SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 10.**  **NATIONAL IMPACT**  **ANALYSIS**

**CHAPTER 11.**  **LIFE­CYCLE COST**  **SUB­GROUP ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 12.**  **PRELIMINARY MANUFACTURER**  **IMPACT ANALYSIS** 

**CHAPTER 13.**  **UTILITY IMPACT**  **ANALYSIS**

**CHAPTER 14.**  **EMPLOYMENT IMPACT**  **ANALYSIS**

REPORTS

**ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT**  **FOR COMMERCIAL**  **REFRIGERATION**

**EQUIPMENT**

**REGULATORY IMPACT**  **ANALYSIS FOR**  **COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION** 

**EQUIPMENT**

APPENDICES

**APPENDIX A.**  **INSTRUCTIONS FOR**  **USING THE**  **ENGINEERING ANALYSIS** 

**SPREADSHEET**

**APPENDIX B.**  **ENGINEERING DATA** 

**APPENDIX C.**  **DETAILED DATA**  **FOR EQUIPMENT**  **PRICE MARKUPS** 

**APPENDIX D.**  **ANNUAL ENERGY**  **SIMULATION INPUTS AND**  **RESULTS FOR** 

**COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT** 

**APPENDIX E.**  **USER INSTRUCTIONS**  **FOR LIFE**  **CYCLE COST**  **SPREADSHEET**

**APPENDIX F.**  **MAPPING BETWEEN ENGINEERING**  **ANALYSIS AND**  **LIFE**

**CYCLE COST**  **ANALYSIS EFFICIENCY**  **LEVELS**

**APPENDIX G.**  **DETAILED LIFE­CYCLE**  **COST OUTPUT** 

**APPENDIX H.**  **USER INSTRUCTIONS**  **FOR NES**  **AND NPV**  **SPREADSHEET**

**DL­1 APPENDIX**  **I. DETAILED**  **NATIONAL ENERGY**  **SAVINGS AND**  **NATIONAL NET** 

**PRESENT VALUE**  **OUTPUT**

**DL­2**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Tuesday, October 6, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE AND TIME:

 Thursday, October 8, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Implementing DC Court of Appeals Opinion in Shays v. FEC.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-22: Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, by Marc Elias, Esquire.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-23: Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, by B. Holly Schadler and Michael B. Trister, Esqs.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-24: Illinois Green Party, by John Ailey, Treasurer.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-24141 Filed 10-6-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
# C_2012146EN.01000301.xml

| 24.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/3

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2012/C 146/03

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 3/12/EMP |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration |
| Address | Postboks 5 St. Olavs plass |
| 0130 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 3/12/EMP

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

Address

Postboks 5 St. Olavs plass

0130 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.nav.no

Title of the aid measure

Indefinite wage subsidies (Tidsubestemt lønnstilskudd)

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Regulation (EC) No 495/2007 on indefinite wage subsidies

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/ad/xd-20070503-0495.html

Type of measure

Scheme

X

Duration

Scheme

From 3.5.2007

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

X

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Large enterprises

X

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

NOK 350 million 2011

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers
  (Articles 40-42) | Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 40) | ... % | |
| Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 41) | Up to 75 % the first year and up to 66 % the following years | |
| Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers
  (Article 42) | ... % | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers

(Articles 40-42)

Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 40)

... %

Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 41)

Up to 75 % the first year and up to 66 % the following years

Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers

(Article 42)

... %

---
42590.

#### TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. GRIER.

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Argued February 6, 1967

Decided March 6, 1967

Rehearing denied March 22, 1967.

*Greene, Buckley, DeRieux, Moore & Jones, James A. Eichelberger,*for appellants.

*James W. Paris, Wesley Channell,*for appellee.

Hall, Judge.

When this workmen’s compensation case was before this court in 1965 a judgment for the employer was reversed and the case remanded with direction that the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation make findings of fact, as required by *Code*§ 114-707, on the following issues: Whether the claimant sustained an accident; whether any accident sustained arose out of and in the course of her employment; whether the claimant gave the employer notice of any accidental injury; whether the claimant suffered any disability on account of the accident and, if so, its extent and duration; the amount and duration of compensation the claimant was entitled to receive. *Grier v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*112 Ga. App. 159 (144 SE2d 196). The board heard further evidence and entered a new award for compensation for the claimant, and the present appeal followed.

The new award contains adequate findings of fact on the issues as directed by the court. The medical testimony was weak but together with non-expert testimony supported findings in the award dated August 19, 1966, that the claimant was disabled because of an accidental fall at work and had been totally disabled since June 7, 1963. *B. P. O. Elks Lodge No. 230 v. Foster,*91 Ga. App. 696 (86 SE2d 725); *Davis v. Cobb County,*106 Ga. App. 336 (126 SE2d 710).

*Judgment affirmed.*
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0584

CITY OF BILLINGS,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DANIEL WAYNE BRUSARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve the opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 3 2021

12/03/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0584
42472.

#### BARNES v. THE STATE.

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 5, 1967

Decided March 1, 1967

Rehearing denied March 16, 1967.

*Beryl H. Weiner,*for appellant.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

1. The first enumeration of error complains of the judgment of the trial court overruling the appellant’s motion for new trial. All of the special grounds assert error either on the court’s failure to include matter in his charge to the jury or on portions of the instructions given. The record, however, makes it clear that none of these objections was raised in the trial court in the manner demanded by the amendment of 1966 (Sec. 6, Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493-501) to the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18). The amendment became effective on March 15, 1966. This case was tried on August 3, 1966. The special grounds of the motion for new trial as well as Enumeration 2, for this reason, present nothing for review. See *Georgia Power Co. v. Maddox,*113 Ga. App. 642 (1, 2) (149 SE2d 393).

The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial on the general grounds as the evidence supported the verdict.

2. There is no merit in Enumeration 3 objecting to certain rulings of the court on evidentiary matters as the rulings were entered during the trial without objection by the defendant. *Green v. State,*110 Ga. App. 346 (138 SE2d 589).

3. Enumerations 4 and 7 decry an alleged expression of opinion by the judge in his instructions to the jury. These enumerations present nothing for decision, as errors in instruction, even those originating under *Code*§ 81-1104, are subject to the provisions of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965. See Division 1 above.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*432
      *Luther C. Llames, Jr., Solicitor General, Duard B. McDonald, Solicitor,*for appellee.
RPAI-2015-3.31-EX 10.3




Exhibit 10.3


RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC.
AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Retention Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between Niall J. Byrne (“Executive”) and Retail Properties of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), effective as of February 19, 2015.
RECITALS
A.On February 19, 2013, Executive and Company entered into that certain Retention Agreement (the “Retention Agreement”) by and between Executive and Company providing inter alia for certain payments to Executive in the event of the termination of Executive’s employment.
B.The structure of the Company’s bonus program has changed since the date of the execution of the Retention Agreement, and the Company and Executive desire to amend the Retention Agreement to reflect the changes in such structure.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Amendment of Retention Agreement.  Section 3(a) of the Retention Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
(a)    Cash Severance (Non-Change in Control).  Executive shall receive on the sixtieth (60th) day following the Termination Date a lump sum cash amount (less applicable withholdings) equal to the sum of (i) twelve (12) months of Executive’s base salary at the rate then in effect (without giving effect to any reduction in the base salary rate amounting to Good Reason), (ii) an amount equal to 100% of the dollar amount of the Executive’s annual bonus (including 100% of the target cash and equity components), calculated based on the annual bonus for the year in which Executive’s employment was terminated (or the prior year if a target annual bonus (both cash and equity) award amount hadn’t yet been established for such year) that would be paid (or granted) to Executive if Executive’s employment had not terminated and if all performance-based milestones were achieved at 100% of the target level by both the Company and Executive (the “Target Bonus”), and (iii) all annual bonus amounts earned during the year in which the termination occurs through the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the termination date but otherwise remaining unpaid as of the Termination Date.
2.Conflicts.  In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Retention Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall supersede and control.  In all other respects, the Retention Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.
Retail Properties of America, Inc.




	
					
	By:
	/s/ Steven P. Grimes
	 
	Date:
	2/19/15

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Executive
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Niall J. Byrne
	 
	Date:
	2/19/15

	 
	Niall J. Byrne
**Exhibit 13.2** 
 
**SECTION 906 - Certification of Chief Financial Officer
I, Cristian Montes Layahe, the Chief Financial Officer of Madeco S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 

1.	the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 27, 2007

/s/ Cristian Montes LahayeCristian Montes LahayeChief Financial Officer**
§ 252.17 Disclosure of stress test results. ( a ) *Public disclosure of results* — ( 1 ) *General.* A state member bank must publicly disclose a summary of the results of the stress test required under this subpart.
( 2 ) *Timing.* For each stress test cycle in which a stress test is conducted: ( i ) A state member bank that is a covered company subsidiary must publicly disclose a summary of the results of the stress test within 15 calendar days after the Board discloses the results of its supervisory stress test of the covered company pursuant to § 252.46(b), unless that time is extended by the Board in writing; and
( ii ) A state member bank that is not a covered company subsidiary must publicly disclose a summary of the results of the stress test in the period beginning on October 15 and ending on October 31, unless that time is extended by the Board in writing.
( 3 ) *Disclosure method.* The summary required under this section may be disclosed on the website of a state member bank, or in any other forum that is reasonably accessible to the public.
( b ) *Summary of results* — ( 1 ) *State member banks that are subsidiaries of bank holding companies.* A state member bank that is a subsidiary of a bank holding company satisfies the public disclosure requirements under this subpart if the bank holding company publicly discloses summary results of its stress test pursuant to this section or § 252.58, unless the Board determines that the disclosures at the holding company level do not adequately capture the potential impact of the scenarios on the capital of the state member bank and requires the state member bank to make public disclosures.
( 2 ) *State member banks that are not subsidiaries of bank holding companies.* A state member bank that is not a subsidiary of a bank holding company or that is required to make disclosures under paragraph (b)(1) of this section must publicly disclose, at a minimum, the following information regarding the severely adverse scenario: ( i ) A description of the types of risks being included in the stress test;
( ii ) A summary description of the methodologies used in the stress test;
( iii ) Estimates of— ( A ) Aggregate losses;
( B ) Pre-provision net revenue
( C ) Provision for credit losses;
( D ) Net income; and
( E ) Pro forma regulatory capital ratios and any other capital ratios specified by the Board; and
( iv ) An explanation of the most significant causes for the changes in regulatory capital ratios.
( c ) *Content of results.* ( 1 ) The disclosure of aggregate losses, pre-provision net revenue, provision for credit losses, and net income that is required under paragraph (b) of this section must be on a cumulative basis over the planning horizon.
( 2 ) The disclosure of pro forma regulatory capital ratios and any other capital ratios specified by the Board that is required under paragraph (b) of this section must include the beginning value, ending value and minimum value of each ratio over the planning horizon.
[Reg. YY, 79 FR 64045, Oct. 27, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 4245, Feb. 14, 2019; 84 FR 59102, Nov. 1, 2019]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2022111EN.01000101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 111/1 |

---

Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AST-SC/10/20 – Secretaries (SC 1/SC 2)

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 211 A of 25 June 2020](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2020_211_A_TOC)
)

(2022/C 111 A/01)

On page 5, Section 5 ‘Assessment phase’ should read:

‘(5)   
Assessment phase

A maximum of 2 times
 the number of successful candidates sought for each grade will be invited to this phase. If you meet the eligibility requirements according to the data in your online application and if you scored one of the
highest overall marks
 for the Microsoft Office Word skills test, you will be invited to the assessment phase.

Seven general competencies, each marked out of 10, and the field-related competencies required for this competition will be tested during the assessment phase through
two tests
 held in your language 2, as described in the following matrices:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Competency | Tests |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | Analysis and problem solving | | Field-related interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Communication | | Field-related interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 3. | Delivering quality and results | | Role-play |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 4. | Learning and development | | Role-play |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 5. | Prioritising and organising | | Role play |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 6. | Resilience | | Field-related interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7. | Working with others | | Role play |

Pass mark: 35/70 in total.

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Competency | Test | Pass marks |
| Field-related competencies | Field-related interview | 35/70 |

Unless instructed otherwise, candidates will have to upload — to their EPSO account — scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. Further details and instructions will be provided by EPSO.’

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

 

In conjunctionwith the annual report of Sharps Compliance Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Burton J. Kunik, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that

 

(1)                  The Form 10-KSB report for the yearsended June 30, 2003 and 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon September 26, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Form10-KSB report for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofSharps Compliance Corp.

 

 
| By:                            | /s/  BURTON J. KUNIK |   |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                |
| Burton J.  Kunik                    |
| Chairman of  the Board of Directors |
| Chief  Executive Officer            |

 

----
# C_2022405EN.01006901.xml

| 21.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/69

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 October 2022

(2022/C 405/11)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9811 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4389 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87258 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9820 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9836 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,525 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 411,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7728 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9203 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,2257 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5554 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3461 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,7008 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7206 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3959 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9106 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0858 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5353 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 250,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6396 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,742 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,360 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1387 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7005 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1755 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9811

JPY

Japanese yen

146,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4389

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87258

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9820

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9836

ISK

Iceland króna

141,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,525

HUF

Hungarian forint

411,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7728

RON

Romanian leu

4,9203

TRY

Turkish lira

18,2257

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5554

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3461

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,7008

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7206

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3959

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,30

ZAR

South African rand

17,9106

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0858

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5353

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 250,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6396

PHP

Philippine peso

57,742

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,360

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1387

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7005

INR

Indian rupee

81,1755

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---