alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 160.40 Commercial paper and corporate debt securities. Pursuant to HOLA section 5(c)(2)(D), a Federal savings association may invest in, sell, or hold commercial paper and corporate debt securities subject to the provisions of this section. ( a ) *Limitations.* ( 1 ) Commercial paper must be: ( i ) Investment grade as of the date of purchase; or
( ii ) Guaranteed by a company having outstanding paper that meets the standard set forth in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) Corporate debt securities must be: ( i ) Securities that may be sold with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to their fair value; and
( ii ) Investment grade.
( 3 ) A Federal savings association's total investment in the commercial paper and corporate debt securities of any one issuer, or issued by any one person or entity affiliated with such issuer, together with other loans, shall not exceed the general lending limitations contained in § 32.3(a) of this chapter.
( 4 ) Investments in corporate debt securities convertible into stock are subject to the following additional limitations: ( i ) The purchase of securities convertible into stock at the option of the issuer is prohibited;
( ii ) At the time of purchase, the cost of such securities must be written down to an amount that represents the investment value of the securities considered independently of the conversion feature; and
( iii ) Federal savings associations are prohibited from exercising the conversion feature.
( 5 ) A Federal savings association shall maintain information in its files adequate to demonstrate that it has exercised prudent judgment in making investments under this section.
( b ) Notwithstanding the limitations contained in this section, the OCC may permit investment in corporate debt securities of another savings association in connection with the purchase or sale of a branch office or in connection with a supervisory merger or acquisition.
( c ) *Underwriting.* Before committing to acquire any investment security, a Federal savings association must determine whether the investment is safe and sound and suitable for the association. The Federal savings association must consider, as appropriate, the interest rate, credit, liquidity, price, transaction, and other risks associated with the investment activity. The Federal savings association must also determine that the issuer has adequate resources and the willingness to provide for all required payments on its obligations in a timely manner.
[76 FR 49030, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 35258, June 13, 2012; 77 FR 37283, June 21, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.5 Registration, reports, and inspections. ( a ) *Registration of bank holding companies.* Each company shall register within 180 days after becoming a bank holding company by furnishing information in the manner and form prescribed by the Board. A company that receives the Board's prior approval under subpart B of this part to become a bank holding company may complete this registration requirement through submission of its first annual report to the Board as required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Reports of bank holding companies.* Each bank holding company shall furnish, in the manner and form prescribed by the Board, an annual report of the company's operations for the fiscal year in which it becomes a bank holding company, and for each fiscal year during which it remains a bank holding company. Additional information and reports shall be furnished as the Board may require.
( c ) *Examinations and inspections.* The Board may examine or inspect any bank holding company and each of its subsidiaries and prepare a report of their operations and activities. With respect to a foreign banking organization, the Board may also examine any branch or agency of a foreign bank in any state of the United States and may examine or inspect each of the organization's subsidiaries in the United States and prepare reports of their operations and activities. The Board shall rely, as far as possible, on the reports of examination made by the primary federal or state supervisor of the subsidiary bank of the bank holding company or of the branch or agency of the foreign bank.
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60778

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MALCOLM HARTZOG,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CR-3-PS

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Malcolm Hartzog appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

distribution of cocaine. He argues that the district court erred

in increasing his base offense level by two points under U.S.S.G.

§ 3B1.1(c) for his role in the offense, and his rights under the

Double Jeopardy Clause were violated in the computation of his

criminal history category under § 4A1.1 and the civil forfeiture
2

proceeding. We review these issues under the plain error standard

because Hartzog raises these grounds for the first time on appeal.

See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)

(en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

 Hartzog has not demonstrated any error, plain or otherwise.

Hartzog has not carried his burden of showing that the district

court considered unreliable information in imposing sentence.

Further, he did not object, but agreed to the Government's

stipulation that a two-level increase for his role in the offense

was appropriate. United States v. Angulo, 927 F.2d 202, 2105 (5th

Cir. 1991); United States v. Branch, 46 F.3d 440, 442 (5th Cir.

1995).

 Hartzog has not shown an error in the computation of his

criminal history category. The sentencing court did not impose

greater punishment under the guidelines than Congress intended.

See United States v. Bigelow, 897 F.2d 160, 161 (5th Cir. 1990)

(citing inter alia Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 343-44

(1981)). Moreover, Hartzog has not provided any portion of the

record of the forfeiture proceeding to support a review of his

double jeopardy argument. See United States v. Gonzalez, 76 F.3d

1339, 1342 (5th Cir. 1996); Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2), 11(a).

 AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                   Amendment No. 3 to the Commercial Lease of
                   December 31, 1991 between Philip R. Thomas
                     and Wayne Heirtzler Thomas, OWNERS and
                           Thomas Group, Inc., LESSEE


The following amendment to that certain Commercial Lease December 31, 1991 is
hereby adopted:

2.3      Upon termination of this lease on November 20, 2016 or at the
         expiration of the renewal option period if said option is exercised by
         LESSEE, OWNER shall pay to LESSEE the fair market value of all
         leasehold improvements placed on the premises by LESSEE at any time and
         remaining on the premises at termination of this lease.

Signed by the parties on _________________________, 1993 in the presence of the
subscribing witnesses.

WITNESSES:








                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Philip R. Thomas, Owner




                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Wayne Heirtzler Thomas, Owner
-----------------------------------





                                    THOMAS GROUP, INC. LESSEE




                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Robert C. Pearson, Vice President
                                    And Chief Financial Officer
-----------------------------------
Exhibit 31.4

I, Jorge Narino, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perry Ellis International, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 1, 2018/s/ Jorge NarinoJorge Narino Interim Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  851,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,438
<INVENTORY>                                  1,583,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,605,871
<PP&E>                                         880,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                 707,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,845,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,720,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,583
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,434,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,845,899
<SALES>                                      9,568,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        6,893,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,515,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,515,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,515,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Trustees
ProLogis: We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-92490, 333-38515,
333-74917, 333-79813, 333-86081, 333-43546, 333-43544, 333-36578, 333-04961, 333-60374, 333-63992,
333-95737, 333-75722, 333-88150, 333-102166 and 333-105717 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
Nos. 333-31421, 333-26597, 333-69001, 333-46700, 333-46698, 333-70274 and 333-97895 on Form S-8, of
ProLogis of our reports dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
ProLogis and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of ProLogis. KPMG LLP
IB 

Union Calendar No. 141

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292

[Report No. 108–250] 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War Veterans 

Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should especially 

be displayed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Additional sponsors: Mr. PORTER, Mr. SIMMONS, and Mr. STRICKLAND

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National 

Korean War Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days 

on which the flag should especially be displayed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 292 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korean War Veterans 

3 Recognition Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VET5 ERANS ARMISTICE DAY. 

6 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amend7 ed by inserting ‘‘National Korean War Veterans Armistice 

8 Day, July 27;’’ after ‘‘July 4;’’. 

Union Calendar No. 141

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292

[Report No. 108–250] 

A BILL

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day to 

the list of days on which the flag should especially be displayed. 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Editorial Note on Part 1266
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1266 appear at 75 FR 76622, Dec. 9, 2010.

§ 1266.10 Collateral valuation; appraisals. ( a ) *Collateral valuation.* Each Bank shall determine the value of collateral securing the Bank's advances in accordance with the collateral valuation procedures set forth in the Bank's member products policy established pursuant to § 1239.30 of this chapter.
( b ) *Fair application of procedures.* Each Bank shall apply the collateral valuation procedures consistently and fairly to all borrowing members, and the valuation ascribed to any item of collateral by the Bank shall be conclusive as between the Bank and the member.
( c ) *Appraisals.* A Bank may require a member to obtain an appraisal of any item of collateral, and to perform such other investigations of collateral as the Bank deems necessary and proper.
[65 FR 44430, July 18, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 76297, Nov. 2, 2016]
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 NAM CORPORATION

                 (Under Section 242 of General Corporation Law)


                  NAM CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), in order
to amend its Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Certificate of
Incorporation"), does hereby certify that:

         FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is NAM Corporation.

         SECOND:  The corporation hereby amends its Certificate of Incorporation
as follows:

               Article FIRST of the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation
is amended to read in its entirety as follow:

                  "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is clickNsettle.com, Inc."

         THIRD: The amendments effected hereby were authorized by a vote of the
holders of a majority of all of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereto
pursuant to Sections 211 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NAM Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed this 15th day of June, 2000.



                                                  NAM CORPORATION


                                                  By: /s/ Roy Israel
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Roy Israel, President


ATTEST:


/s/ Carla Israel
-----------------------
Carla Israel, Secretary
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00120

- CR

SERGIO MALDONADO FACUNDO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CR

- 16

- 25804

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Court Reporter Charla Reamy recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause number 06

- 17

- 00120

- CR, styled Sergio Maldonado Facundo v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number CR

- 16

- 25804 in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in this matter on July 11, 2017. That deadline was extended twice by this Court, resulting in the most recent due date of September 11, 2017. Reamy has now filed a third request for an extension o f the filing deadline. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appe llate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonabl e amount of time. Therefore, we order Reamy to file the reporter’s record in appellate cause number 06

- 17

- 00120

- CR, styled Sergio Maldonado Facundo v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number CR

16

- 25804 in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, Texas, to be received no later than the close of business on Wednesday, October 11, 2017. If the reporter’s record is not received on or before October 11, we warn Reamy that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she sho uld not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: September 19, 2017
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.26

                          ELEPHANT & CASTLE GROUP INC.
                                 LEASE ABSTRACT

1.     PROJECT             CLUB QUARTERS HOTEL, SAN FRANCSICO, CALIFORNIA

2.     TENANT              BC Restaurants, LLC

3.     STORE AREA          Approx 5,500 sf, excluding conference rooms

4.     TRADE NAME          Elephant & Castle Pub Restaurant

5.     USE                 Operation of a full service casual dining restaurant,
                           additionally providing services in both club, meeting
                           and conference space(s) of hotel premises

6.     TERM                10 years

7.     TERM START          March 26, 2003
       DATE

8.     TERM EXPIRY         February 28, 2013
       DATE

9.     MINIMUM RENT        Nil, exclusive of CAM, Taxes and insurance


10.    EXTENSION           None
       PERIODS

11.    PERCENTAGE          5% of Gross Proceeds from Banquet Services & guest
                           rooms

12.    PREPAID RENT        Nil

13.    SECURITY
       DEPOSIT             None

14.    INITIAL PRO-        Nil
       MOTION CHARGE

15.    FIXTURING           Nil
       PERIOD

16.    LANDLORD            Battery & Clay Associates, LLC
       ADDRESS             C/O Masterworks Development Corporation
                           555 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY   10036

17.    GUARANTOR           None

18.    PROPERTY
       MANAGER             Nil

19.    LANDLORD TENANT     Landlord to construct and fit out the premises
       ALLOWANCE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2816

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs in the management of health care services for veterans to place 

certain low-income veterans in a higher health-care priority category. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2003

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself and Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in the management of health 

care services for veterans to place certain low-income 

veterans in a higher health-care priority category.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH 

4 CARE PRIORITY FOR CERTAIN LOW-INCOME 

5 VETERANS BASED UPON REGIONAL INCOME 

6 THRESHOLDS. 

7 (a) CHANGE IN PRIORITY CATEGORY.—Section 

8 1705(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 2816 IH 

1 (1) in paragraph (5)—

2 (A) by inserting ‘‘(A) who are’’ after ‘‘Vet3 erans’’; 

4 (B) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘through 

5 (4)’’; and 

6 (C) by inserting before the period at the 

7 end the following: ‘‘, or (B) who are described 

8 in section 1710(a)(3) of this title and are eligi9 ble for treatment as a low-income family under 

10 section 3(b) of the United States Housing Act 

11 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)) for the area in 

12 which such veterans reside, regardless of wheth13 er such veterans are treated as single person 

14 families under paragraph (3)(A) of such section 

15 3(b) or as families under paragraph (3)(B) of 

16 such section 3(b)’’; 

17 (2) by striking paragraph (7); and 

18 (3) by redesignating paragraph (8) as para19 graph (7) and in that paragraph by striking ‘‘para20 graph (7)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (5)(B)’’. 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1710(f)(4) 

22 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘section 1705(a)(7)’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘section 1705(a)(5)(B)’’. 
3

•HR 2816 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on October 2, 2004.

Æ