alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2816 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2816

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs in the management of health care services for veterans 
 to place certain low-income veterans in a higher health-care priority 
                               category.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2003

  Mr. Bishop of New York (for himself and Mrs. McCarthy of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs in the management of health care services for veterans 
 to place certain low-income veterans in a higher health-care priority 
                               category.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH CARE PRIORITY FOR 
              CERTAIN LOW-INCOME VETERANS BASED UPON REGIONAL INCOME 
              THRESHOLDS.

    (a) Change in Priority Category.--Section 1705(a) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(A) who are'' after 
                ``Veterans'';
                    (B) by inserting ``and'' after ``through (4)''; and
                    (C) by inserting before the period at the end the 
                following: ``, or (B) who are described in section 
                1710(a)(3) of this title and are eligible for treatment 
                as a low-income family under section 3(b) of the United 
                States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)) for the 
                area in which such veterans reside, regardless of 
                whether such veterans are treated as single person 
                families under paragraph (3)(A) of such section 3(b) or 
                as families under paragraph (3)(B) of such section 
                3(b)'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (7); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (7) and in 
        that paragraph by striking ``paragraph (7)'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (5)(B)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1710(f)(4) of such title is 
amended by striking ``section 1705(a)(7)'' and inserting ``section 
1705(a)(5)(B)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 2, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Second Senior Officials Meeting on Atlantic Cooperation

# 									Second Senior Officials Meeting on Atlantic Cooperation							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 8, 2023

Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Ambassador Jessye Lapenn hosted the second virtual meeting of senior representatives from 45 Atlantic coastal countries on September 6, 2023, to discuss the draft Declaration on Atlantic Cooperation, which builds upon the Joint Statement issued last September on the margins of the UN General Assembly. The Declaration on Atlantic Cooperation and Action Plan are intended to launch a Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation later this month in New York.

The Atlantic states that joined the meeting reflected a shared a commitment to a peaceful, prosperous, open, and cooperative Atlantic region that will remain a healthy and environmentally resilient resource for generations to come.

For more information, please visit the Atlantic Cooperation website. For media inquiries, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonUnited Nations General Assembly

Back to Top
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
  connection with the Annual Report of Elephant & Castle Group Inc. (the "Company")
  on Form 10-K for the period ended December 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Bryant,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|                      | /s/ Richard
      Bryant   
|--------------------- | ---------------------------
|                      | Richard Bryant             
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and
|                      | President                  
|                      |                            
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |                            



---
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Rosenblum, Daniel N – Republic of Kazakhstan- June 2022

# 									Rosenblum, Daniel N – Republic of Kazakhstan- June 2022							

Certificate of Competency

June 9, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:  Republic of Kazakhstan 

CANDIDATE: Daniel N. Rosenblum 

Daniel N. Rosenblum, a career member of the Senior Executive Service, has served as U.S. Ambassador to Uzbekistan since 2019.  Prior to that, he was a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the State Department’s Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs where he managed U.S. policy and diplomatic relations with the five Central Asian states.  Previously, Rosenblum was appointed to serve as Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia, where he was responsible for ensuring the strategic and efficient expenditure of foreign aid budgets averaging over $1 billion annually.  He also served as the primary U.S. government liaison with other international donors, including the European Union and multilateral development banks.  Earlier, Rosenblum held the positions of Deputy Coordinator, Director of the Eurasia Division, and Special Advisor for Economic Programs in the Assistance Coordinator’s office.  Rosenblum has devoted much of his twenty-five-year State Department career to South and Central Asia.  This extensive and substantive regional experience, coupled with his management experience and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams, makes him a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Kazakhstan.   

Before joining the State Department, Rosenblum spent six years at the Free Trade Union Institute (FTUI) and also worked as a legislative assistant to U.S. Senator Carl Levin, advising him on foreign affairs and trade policy.  Rosenblum received his BA in History from Yale University and an MA in Soviet Studies and International Economics from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.  He speaks Russian. 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             FRONTIER ENERGY CORP.
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



      The undersigned, Robert Genesi, in his capacities as President and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of Frontier Energy  Corp.  does hereby certify that the
Form 10-Q of Frontier Energy Corp. for the quarter ended  March  31, 2008 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))  and  that  the  information
contained in such Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in  all  material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Frontier Energy Corp.

      This certification is given by the undersigned solely  for the purpose of
18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.


      Executed this 15th day of May, 2008.


                                    /s/ Robert Genesi
			            -----------------
                                    Robert Genesi
                                    President and Acting Chief Financial
                                    Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Acadia Realty
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth F. Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

| |                                       | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Kenneth F. Bernstein              | 
| |                                       | 
| | Kenneth F. Bernstein                  | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | February 28, 2011                     | 

---
§ 1253.4 New product determination. ( a ) A new product is any new activity that the Director determines merits public notice and comment about whether it is in the public interest.
( b ) The factors that the Director may consider when determining whether a new product is in the public interest are: ( 1 ) The degree to which the new product might advance any of the purposes of the Enterprise under its authorizing statute;
( 2 ) The degree to which the new product serves underserved markets and housing goals as set forth in sections 1332-1335 of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4562-4565);
( 3 ) The degree to which the new product is being or could be supplied by other market participants;
( 4 ) The degree to which the new product promotes competition in the marketplace or, to the contrary, would result in less competition;
( 5 ) The degree to which the new product overcomes natural market barriers or inefficiencies;
( 6 ) The degree to which the new product might raise or mitigate risks to the mortgage finance or financial system;
( 7 ) The degree to which the new product furthers fair housing and fair lending; and
( 8 ) Such other factors as determined appropriate by the Director.
## TH E CIT Y O F FOR

T WAYN E MEMBE R O F TH E COMMO N COUNCI L ON E MAI N STREE T • ROO M 12 2 • FOR T WAYNE , INDIAN A 4680 2 • 260-427-122 1 • FA X 260-427-137 1
October 11 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretar y U.S
. Department

o f Transportatio n S~''^zP.rr ' 40 0 7 * St. , s w _: > :.^Zt!:'; q Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 —r ^ o O Dea r Secretar y LaHood : — I a mwritin g t o offe

r m y stron g support

t o th e For

t Wayne-Alle n County Airport Authority' s applicatio n fo r th e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program(Docke t

OST-2010-0124)
. Th e Authorit y i s takin g anove l an duniqu e approac h towar dencouragin g competitiv e activity an dcos t reductio n amon g passenge r ai r servic e provider s a

t th e For t Wayn e International Airport (FWA)
. Economi c development

i s essentia l t o Northeastern Indiana , an dcommunity leader s i n th e regio n hav e bee n workin g aggressivel y t o creat e abusines s climat e that support s growth , an davibran t airpor t i s ake y component

t o th e overal l succes s o f

ou r efforts
. Th e geograph y o f th e Fort Wayn e marke t

present s a difficult challeng e fo

r passenge r

servic e developmen t

a t FWA
. Traditionall y airport s hav e sough t t o brin g i n low-cos t

carrier s o r

sel l thei r passenge r

servic e provider s on additional destinations
. A s th e airlin e industry continue s t o consolidate , th e opportunitie s t o "sell " th e airline s on expandin g thei r ai r servic e t o smaller

airport s ar e increasingl y difficult , Th e Authority' s solutio n t o thi s proble mi s uniqu e an di s acredi t t o thei r focu s o n developin g appropriat e marke t researc h an didentifyin g creativ e application s for th e ai r servic e developmen t

challenge
. Throug^ i th e implementatio n o f

ashare dus e platform , multipl e airline s wil l b e abl e t o us e acommo n poin t t o issu e tickets , chang e reservations , an dotl^rwis e proces s thei r individua l passengers . B y removin g th e nee dfo

r individual point s o f

access, cost s wil l b e reduced , sinc e ther e wil l b e commo n dat a line s an dsingula

r equipment , an dth e airpor t wil l realiz e a

n increas e i n flexibility sinc e al l airline s wil l b e abl e t o utiliz e al l gates . Additionally , lea dtim e for ne w service s wil l b e reduced , technologica l barrier s removed , an dphysical expansio n need s revi^d , al l o f whic h wil l serv e t o make operation s a t FW A mor e cos t effectiv e andattractive
. Onc e again , I woul dlike t o expres s m y stron g suppor

t fo r thi s applicatio n an durg e you t o giv e it ever y possibl e consideration
. Than k you . Sincerely ,

Timothy M
. Pap c 5 * Distric t Cit y Councihna n

A N EQUA L OPPORTUNIT Y EWlOYE R
ODFL EXHIBIT 10.19.10 - 1Q2015


Exhibit 10.19.10


2015 DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
PHANTOM STOCK PLAN


This 2015 Declaration of Amendment to the Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. Phantom Stock Plan (“Plan”) is made and entered into by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (“Company”).  Defined terms used in the Plan, effective May 16, 2005 and as restated effective January 1, 2009 and further amended effective May 18, 2009 and May 17, 2011, shall have the same meaning therein as herein. 
 
RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has deemed it advisable to amend Section 9.1 of the Plan to clarify Plan provisions related to domestic relations orders under Section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code; and 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to evidence these changes by this Declaration of Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS DECLARED that upon approval of this Declaration of Amendment by the Board of Directors on January 29, 2015, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows:


1.Section 9.1 is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


9.1    Assignment and Transfer. Except as may be necessary to fulfill a domestic relations order within the meaning of Code Section 414(p)(1)(B), Awards shall not be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and may be realized, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant or by his or her guardian or legal representative.  No Award or interest or right therein shall be liable for the debts, contracts, or engagements of the Participant or his successors in interest or shall be subject to disposition by transfer, alienation, anticipation, pledge, encumbrance, assignment, or any other means whether such disposition be voluntary or involuntary or by operation of law, by judgment, levy, attachment, garnishment, or any other legal or equitable proceedings (including bankruptcy), and any attempted disposition thereof shall be null and void and of no effect, except to the extent that such disposition is permitted by the preceding sentence. The Administrator may accelerate the time or schedule of payment from the Plan in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ii) to the extent necessary to fulfill the terms of a domestic relations order (as defined in Code Section 414(p)(1)(B)); provided, however, that any such distribution may be made only to the extent an Award is vested.


		
	2.
	Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall be unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect. 











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Amendment is executed by the Company. 


OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.




By:    /s/ David S. Congdon            
David S. Congdon, President and Chief
Executive Officer 


ATTEST:




   /s/ Ross H. Parr            
Ross H. Parr
Vice President – Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary 


(Corporate Seal)





2
# C_2006133EN.01000801.xml

| 8.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/8

---

53rd amendment of the State aid guidelines

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

(2006/C 133/06)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: n.a.

Case No: 55134

Title: Introduction of a new Chapter 18 C to the Authority's State Aid Guidelines on ‘State aid in the form of public service compensation’ and proposal for appropriate measures.

Legal basis: College Decision No 328/05/COL

Decision: The appropriate measures, proposed by the Authority and accepted by the EFTA States are as follows:

that the EFTA States bring their existing schemes regarding public service compensation into line with the new guidelines, within 18 months following the notification of the Decision to the EFTA States.

---
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.26 Factors considered in acting on nonbanking proposals. ( a ) *In general.* In evaluating a notice under § 225.23 or § 225.24, the Board shall consider whether the notificant's performance of the activities can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public (such as greater convenience, increased competition, and gains in efficiency) that outweigh possible adverse effects (such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, and unsound banking practices).
( b ) *Financial and managerial resources.* Consideration of the factors in paragraph (a) of this section includes an evaluation of the financial and managerial resources of the notificant, including its subsidiaries and any company to be acquired, the effect of the proposed transaction on those resources, and the management expertise, internal control and risk-management systems, and capital of the entity conducting the activity.
( c ) *Competitive effect of de novo proposals.* Unless the record demonstrates otherwise, the commencement or expansion of a nonbanking activity *de novo* is presumed to result in benefits to the public through increased competition.
( d ) *Denial for lack of information.* The Board may deny any notice submitted under this subpart if the notificant neglects, fails, or refuses to furnish all information required by the Board.
( e ) *Conditional approvals.* The Board may impose conditions on any approval, including conditions to address permissibility, financial, managerial, safety and soundness, competitive, compliance, conflicts of interest, or other concerns to ensure that approval is consistent with the relevant statutory factors and other provisions of the BHC Act.
# C_2011050EN.01000501.xml

| 17.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/5

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 12 October 2010 in the case of Philip Morris Norway AS and Staten/Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet

(Case E-16/10)

2011/C 50/05

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 12 October 2010 from Oslo tingrett (Oslo District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 19 October 2010, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Philip Morris Norway AS v Staten v/Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, on the following questions:

| 1. | Shall Article 11 of the EEA Agreement be understood to mean that a general prohibition against the visible display of tobacco products constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on the free movement of goods? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Shall Article 11 of the EEA Agreement be understood to mean that a general prohibition against the visible display of tobacco products constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on the free movement of goods?

| 2. | Assuming there is a restriction, which criteria would be decisive to determine whether a display prohibition, based on the objective of reduced tobacco use by the public in general and especially amongst young people, would be suitable and necessary having regard to public health? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Assuming there is a restriction, which criteria would be decisive to determine whether a display prohibition, based on the objective of reduced tobacco use by the public in general and especially amongst young people, would be suitable and necessary having regard to public health?

---