alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 192.380 Purchase of conversion shares by employee stock ownership plan. ( a ) *In general.* A savings association's tax-qualified employee stock ownership plan may purchase up to 10 percent of the total offering of the savings association's conversion shares.
( b ) *Revised stock valuation range.* If the appropriate Federal banking agency approves a revised stock valuation range as described in § 192.330(e), and the final conversion stock valuation range exceeds the former maximum stock offering range, a savings association may allocate conversion shares to its tax-qualified employee stock ownership plan, up to the 10 percent limit in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Open market purchase.* If a savings association's tax-qualified employee stock ownership plan is not able to or chooses not to purchase stock in the offering, it may, with prior appropriate Federal banking agency approval and appropriate disclosure in the savings association's offering circular, purchase stock in the open market, or purchase authorized but unissued conversion shares.
( d ) *Charitable organizations.* A savings association may include stock contributed to a charitable organization in the conversion in the calculation of the total offering of conversion shares under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, unless the appropriate Federal banking agency objects on supervisory grounds.
1

MEMORANDUM

Date: July 30, 2012

Subject: EPA

– Felman Corporation Teleconference Summary ( June 7, 2012)

From: Beth Friedman, EC/R Incorporated

To: Conrad Chin, OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02)

I. Introduction:

A conference call was held on June 7, 2012 to d iscuss the status and content of the stack test protocol being developed by Felman Production for planned stack testing in July. Felman and Eramet Marietta (EMI) are coordinating their upcoming particulate matter compliance
tests in order to obtain additi onal data on manganese, mercury, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), formaldehyde and hydrochloric acid (HCl). The plants are collecting this information on a voluntary basis with the intent of providing data for EPA to consider in setting stack limi ts for the final Ferroalloys Production National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). This memo provides an overview of the issues
discussed.

II. Participants:

Felman Production, Inc. John Konrady, Rich Lunn, Shawn McCutchan, Robert Po well Beveridge & Diamond : Amy Lincoln Policy Navigation Group : Troy Hillier West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection : James Robertson

EPA/ OAQPS : Conrad Chin, Jason Dewees, Chuck French, Stef Johnson, Robin Segall,
Peter Westlin EC/R Incorporate d (Contractor for EPA) : Beth Friedman

III. Summary of Discussions:

The following topics were discussed.

 Felman and Eramet are coordinating development of their test protocols to ensure they collect comparable data. They believe this will address issues that exist with the current data set, where some pollutants were collected using different2 methods

, and address the plants ’ concerns whether the previous source tests conducted by them correctly adjusted for CO 2 concentration.

 The plants are using the test pro tocol from the 2010 information collection request as a starting point in developing their protocols. EPA provided the following comments on that protocol:

o The plants should disregard the direction to provide a correction to 2% CO 2

.

o The plants should pr ovide information on production rate data during the test.

o The plants should test PAHs at the stack at both plants.

o For mercury testing, the plants should use Method 30B.

 The EPA offered to send the plants a list of suggested test methods for their
review.

 The group discussed the potential to test for fugitive emissions at the roof. Felman noted that there are several roof vents (dog boxes) that are used to house fans. It is not physically possible to access these vents from the exterior, and
interior acc ess is prevented by the movement of the crane. There is also no measurable velocity at these vents. They added that emissions are the result of ladle raking, which is a limited event (15 minutes). The EPA noted that it would be possible to develop a via ble testing protocol given time and resources.

 Felman noted that they are considering closing some of these roof vents permanently to eliminate fugitive emissions from them.
#### § 212.9 Effect of Interlocks Act on Clayton Act.

The Board regards the provisions of the first three paragraphs of section 8 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 19) to have been supplanted by the revised and more comprehensive prohibitions on management official interlocks between depository organizations in the Interlocks Act.
# EUR-Lex - E2003C1016(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# E2003C1016(02)

**Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement — EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections **

*
Official Journal C 248 , 16/10/2003 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

(2003/C 248/07)

Date of adoption: 16 July 2003

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: SAM 030.02.011

Title: Special Tax Regime for Shipping Companies

Objective: To preserve Norway's maritime interests by enhancing the competitiveness of the shipping industry

Legal basis: General Tax Act, Section 8-10 to Section 8-20

Duration: Unlimited (scheme is subject to annual budget appropriations by the Norwegian Parliament)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable John Quigley, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironment Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 Dear Secretary Quigley: 

### MAR 

### 30 2016

On March 3, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP), dated March 2, 2016, from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection pertaining to implementation ofreasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for the control ofvolatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2166, or at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

# ~t{J Nikos Singelis, Acting Director Air Protection Division
cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau ofAir Quality



## 0 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: ·l-800-438-2474
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                            JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                     28,896,000
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               4,427,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (473,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                 2,848,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           39,254,000
<PP&E>                                                    145,443,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (20,843,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            166,374,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      22,264,000
<BONDS>                                                   100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        4,939
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              166,374,000
<SALES>                                                    43,877,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           40,931,000
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              36,093,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              123,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2,751,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             2,087,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  670,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                1,417,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.27


</TABLE>
# C_2022409EN.01001301.xml

| 25.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 October 2022

(2022/C 409/09)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9851 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0795 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9856 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,482 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 411,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7908 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9128 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3298 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5631 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3502 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,7329 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7343 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4008 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 418,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0625 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1544 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5337 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 362,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6674 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,021 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,600 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1461 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6514 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,5451 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9851

JPY

Japanese yen

146,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87070

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0795

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9856

ISK

Iceland króna

142,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,482

HUF

Hungarian forint

411,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7908

RON

Romanian leu

4,9128

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3298

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5631

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3502

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,7329

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7343

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4008

KRW

South Korean won

1 418,40

ZAR

South African rand

18,0625

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1544

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5337

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 362,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6674

PHP

Philippine peso

58,021

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,600

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1461

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6514

INR

Indian rupee

81,5451

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
x10c1-q12015






EXHIBIT 10(c)1






BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2015 of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Georgia Power Company and certain other executive officers of Georgia Power Company who served during 2014.




	
		
	W. Paul Bowers
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$814,895

	W. Ron Hinson
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
And Treasurer
	$372,254

	Joseph A. Miller
Executive Vice President
	$567,582

	John L. Pemberton
Executive Vice President
	$336,929

	Anthony L. Wilson
Executive Vice President
	$368,280
810-100311-005 

%€f 

KANSA S 

^MN!l/^HAN f?tGK:>^JAl AIHPO«1 

March 1.2010 

Hie Honorable Raymond II. Lallood 

Secretary 

U.S. Deparlnicnt of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-00>4 ^^^'^ '<^^' ^^ 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

I am writing to express my support Tor the application for antitrust immunity and 

proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines (AA) and Japan Airlines 

(JAL). The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld 

alliance to compete clTcctively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This increased 

alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies 

policy - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for 

further openness across Asia. 

1 strongly encourage the Department of Iransportation to approve this application as it 

would enable these oneworld allitince airlines to work closely together to deliver highly 

competiiivc air transportation services. Approval of the AA/JAL alliance will have a 

positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing 

options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit fi"om the competition 

afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sinccrclv. 

Peter C. Van Kuren 

Airport Director 

FLY .COM 

Manhattan Regional Airport
42691.

#### BEASLEY v. THE STATE.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The defendant-appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction and sentence for the offense of “shooting at another.”

1. Error is enumerated on the denial by the trial judge of the appellant’s motion for a continuance on the ground of the absence of a witness. There are eight statutory requirements each of which must be met before the appellate courts may review a trial judge’s discretion in denying a motion for a continuance on this ground. These are (1) that the witness is absent (2 )that he has been subpoenaed (3) that he does not reside more than 100 miles from the place of trial by the nearest practical route, (4) that his testimony is material, (5) that the witness is not absent by permission (directly or *828indirectly) of the movant, (6) that movant expects to be able to procure the testimony of the witness at the next term of court, (7) that the continuance is not requested for purposes of delay but to enable the party to procure the testimony of the absent witness and, (8) the facts expected to be proved by the absent witness must be stated. *Code Ann.*§ 81-1410. Here th,e record is silent with respect to the statutory essentials numbers 3 and 6 above and at best is unpersuasive with respect to essential 4. Under these circumstances the judge’s exercise of discretion in denying the continuance will not be disturbed. *Carroll v. Crawford,*218 Ga. 635, 637 (1) (129 SE2d 865); *Smith v. State,*170 Ga. 234 (1) (152 SE 482); *Evans v. State,*167 Ga. 261, 262 (1) (145 SE 512); *Teal v. State,*17 Ga. App. 324 (1) (86 SE 739); *McClain v. State,*17 Ga. App. 750 (1) (88 SE 409).

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Submitted April 4, 1967

Decided May 26, 1967

Rehearing denied June 8, 1967.

*W. Owen Slate, Charles W. Bergman,*for appellant.

*Lewis B. Slaton, Solicitor General, Jess H. Watson, J. Walter LeCraw, Amber W. Anderson,*for appellee.

2. The remaining 5 enumerations, though paraphrased, contend only that the evidence did not support the verdict of guilt but demanded an acquittal. These grounds have no merit. As shown by the syrorn testimony of the defendant and the person shot, the evidence is undisputed that the defendant did in fact shoot the other with a .22 caliber pistol. The evidence revealed the events, facts and circumstances preceding, including and following the shooting which were sufficient to authorize the jury to find the defendant guilty of the statutory offense of shooting at another. *Perry v. State,*104 Ga. App. 383 (121 SE2d 692); *Polhill v. State,*67 Ga. App. 325 (20 SE2d 200); *Fallon v. State,*5 Ga. App. 659 (63 SE 806); *Harris v. State,*120 Ga. 167 (47 SE 520); *Baldwin v. State,*120 Ga. 188 (1) (47 SE 558).

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 1002.113 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart, or any application of a provision, is stayed or determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions or applications are severable and shall continue in effect.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10.1
                              [TSS+P LETTERHEAD]




F.A.O. Mr. T. Broughton
Global CyberSports.com
5th Floor
Royal London House
Christchurch Road
Bournemouth
Dorset
BH1 3LT

4 March 2000



Dear Tony,

These are the terms that we are prepared to offer GlobalCyberSports.com:

GCSC will receive a 30% discount on the prevailing UK wholesale price of all
adult ranges of Formula 1 merchandise currently produced under license by TSS+P
Ltd.

GCSC are granted non-exclusive rights to sell the above stated merchandise via
the World Wide Web on a Global basis.

All retail prices for the sale of goods via the WWW or otherwise must be
approved by TSS+P prior to any sale.

All commerce websites, promotional material or press releases whether
on-line, electronic or otherwise featuring the Ferrari name, logos or
trademarks must be approved in advance by TSS+P.

Internet orders fulfilled by TSS+P or their nominated agents will be handled
on a direct consumer basis only.  All monies will be collected by automated
credit card authorization only.  Monies received via the internet will be
paid to GCSC on a monthly basis less the agreed discount purchase price,
distribution and delivery costs and all credit card commissions, once cleared
funds are received from the assuring bank.

TSS+P is the largest manufacturer of clothing and promotional material for
the Formula 1 market and hold the world wide license's for Ferrari, Michael
Schumacher and Benetton.

Our annual turnover for F1 goods is (Pound Sterling) 20,000,000.

<PAGE>   2

This agreement is valid until December 22nd 2000.

Any breach of the above terms will result in the immediate termination of this
agreement and a withdrawal of all fulfillment services.

I trust the above meets with your approval but should you have any further
queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Your sincerely,



T.M. Chandler
Chief Executive
UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
March 31, 1999

EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                            ------------------
(Unaudited - Dollars in millions)                           1999          1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                              $ 48.5        $134.4
  Add:  Fixed charges                                       19.7          14.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings as adjusted                                      $ 68.2        $148.6
==============================================================================
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                        $ 16.8        $ 11.7
  Interest portion of rent expense                           2.9           2.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                                       $ 19.7        $ 14.2
==============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           3.5          10.5
==============================================================================

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income before income taxes and fixed charges.  Fixed charges
consist of interest expense and the estimated interest portion of rent expense.
#### § 23.5 Requirement for separate records.

If a national bank enters into both CEBA Leases and Section 24(Seventh) Leases, the bank's records must distinguish the CEBA Leases from the Section 24(Seventh) Leases.
§ 221.4 Employee stock option, purchase, and ownership plans. ( a ) *Plan-lender; eligible plan.* ( 1 ) Plan-lender means any corporation, (including a wholly-owned subsidiary, or a lender that is a thrift organization whose membership is limited to employees and former employees of the corporation, its subsidiaries or affiliates) that extends or maintains credit to finance the acquisition of margin stock of the corporation, its subsidiaries or affiliates under an eligible plan.
( 2 ) *Eligible plan.* An eligible plan means any employee stock option, purchase, or ownership plan adopted by a corporation and approved by its stockholders that provides for the purchase of margin stock of the corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
( b ) *Credit to exercise rights under or finance an eligible plan.* ( 1 ) If a plan-lender extends or maintains credit under an eligible plan, any margin stock that directly or indirectly secured that credit shall have good faith loan value.
( 2 ) Credit extended under this section shall be treated separately from credit extended under any other section of this part except § 221.3(b)(1) and (b)(3).
( c ) *Credit to ESOPs.* A nonbank lender may extend and maintain purpose credit without regard to the provisions of this part, except for § 221.3(b)(1) and (b)(3), if such credit is extended to an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 401).
§ 192.115 Review of business plan by the appropriate Federal banking agency. ( a ) *Agency review.* The appropriate Federal banking agency will review the savings association's business plan to determine that it demonstrates a safe and sound deployment of conversion proceeds, as part of its review of the application for conversion. In making its determination, the appropriate Federal banking agency will consider how the savings association has addressed the applicable factors of § 192.105. No single factor will be determinative.
( b ) *Filing of business plan.* A savings association must file its business plan as a separate confidential exhibit to the Form AC with the appropriate OCC licensing office if it is a Federal savings association, or with the appropriate Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) region if it is a State savings association. The appropriate Federal banking agency may request additional information, if necessary, to support its determination under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Operation within business plan.* If the appropriate Federal banking agency approves a savings association's application for conversion and the conversion is completed, the savings association must operate within the parameters of its business plan. The savings association must obtain the prior written approval of the appropriate Federal banking agency for any material deviations from its business plan.