alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF THE COMPANY'S MOST RECENT
QUARTER DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIOD AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD UP TO THE DATE OF THE BALANCE SHEET AND THE COMPARABLE PERIOD OF THE 
PRECEDING FISCAL YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
UNAUDITED STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,702
<INVENTORY>                                     51,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,036
<PP&E>                                           6,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          994,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,098,050
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,287
<SALES>                                        148,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,594
<CGS>                                          122,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,462)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023014EN.01000501.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 14/04)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by France

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: France

Subject of commemoration: Olympic Games 2024

Description of the design: One hundred years after the 1924 Olympic Games, France is once again hosting the Summer Games, which will take place in Paris in 2024, an event with international echo whose intensity gradually builds in the years leading up to the event.

On the occasion of the countdown to the Olympic Games, Monnaie de Paris wishes to celebrate the road to the Games. It therefore plans to issue each year 2022, 2023 and 2024 a commemorative two-euro coin with an original face celebrating the Games, through the heritage of France and Paris.

The design represents the genius, a national figure and icon of French numismatics. It is depicted practicing discus throwing in an ‘ancient’ way in reference to the Olympic Games of the Antique era. His silhouette blends with the one of the Arc de Triomphe, a key element of Parisian heritage. It forms a common axis with this emblematic monument of victory. In the background, an athletics track in which the emblem of Paris 2024 is inserted on the right side, is represented. The year date, the mention RF and the mintmarks are inserted under the arch and around the foot of the Arc.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 260 000

Date of issue: September 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
<PAGE>


                                                          EXHIBIT 10 (a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 16 to Registration Statement No. 33-41628 of Sun Life of Canada (U.S.)
Variable Account F on Form N-4 of our report dated February 10, 2000
accompanying the financial statements of Regatta, Regatta Gold, Regatta
Classic and Regatta Platinum Sub-Accounts included in Sun Life of Canada
(U.S.) Variable Account F, to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 10, 2000 accompanying the financial statements of Futurity,
Futurity II, Futurity Focus and Futurity Accolade Sub-Accounts included in
Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Variable Account F appearing in the Statements of
Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement, to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 10, 2000 accompanying
the statutory financial statements of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
(U.S.), which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of
statutory accounting practices which differ from accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, appearing in each of the
Prospectuses, which are part of such Registration Statement, and to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 10, 2000 appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
for the year ended December 31, 1999, which includes explanatory paragraphs
relating to the use of statutory accounting practices which differ from
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.




We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Accountants" and
Appendix B - "Condensed Financial Information - Accumulation Units Values"
in each Prospectus and under the heading "Accountants" in the Statement of
Additional Information relating to each Prospectus, which are incorporated by
reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
June 26, 2000
```

[110th Congress Public Law 35]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ035.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 225]]

Public Law 110-35
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To suspend the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban 
   Development regarding electronic filing of previous participation 
 certificates and regarding filing of such certificates with respect to 
  certain low-income housing investors. <<NOTE: June 15, 2007 -  [H.R. 
                                1675]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Preservation Approval 
Process Improvement Act of 2007.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preservation Approval Process 
Improvement Act of 2007''.
SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENT.

    The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall--
            (1) <<NOTE: Regulations.>>  suspend mandatory processing of 
        Previous Participation Certificates (form HUD-2530) under the 
        Department of Housing and Urban Development's Automated Partners 
        Performance System (APPS) and permit paper filings of such 
        certificates until such time that the Secretary--
                    (A) revises the December 2006 draft proposed 
                regulations under subpart H of part 200 of title 24, 
                Code of Federal Regulations, to eliminate the 
                unnecessary burdens and disincentives for program 
                participants; and
                    (B) submits such revised draft proposed regulations 
                to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of 
                Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                and Urban Affairs of the Senate for review by such 
                Committees; and
            (2) suspend immediately all filing requirements under the 
        Previous Participation Certificate process with respect to 
        limited liability corporate investors who own or expect to own 
        an interest in entities which are allowed or are expected to 

[[Page 121 STAT. 226]]

        be allowed low-income housing tax credits under section 42 of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Approved June 15, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1675:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-106 (Comm. on Financial Services).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Apr. 24, considered and passed House.
            May 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
In the Senate of the United States,

September 16, 2003.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2754) entitled ‘‘An Act making appropriations for

energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the

following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any

2 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the

3 fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, for energy and

4 water development, and for other purposes, namely:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENT FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         3,937,071
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,080,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                     201,040
<INVENTORY>                                      209,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13,068,287
<PP&E>                                         9,143,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,131,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,606,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,726,760
<BONDS>                                        4,007,043
<COMMON>                                          43,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    10,105,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,606,145
<SALES>                                       13,402,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13,402,935
<CGS>                                          1,833,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,464,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,057,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                47,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,655,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,798,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,857,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,857,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.53


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials will be held November 
17-18, 2009, at the Hamilton Crowne Plaza, 14th and K Streets, NW., 
Washington, DC. The sessions will begin at 8 a.m. on November 17 and at 
8:30 a.m. on November 18 and adjourn at 4 p.m. on both days. The 
meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of national cemeteries, soldiers' lots 
and plots, the selection of new national cemetery sites, the erection 
of appropriate memorials, and the adequacy of Federal burial benefits.
    On November 17, the Committee will receive updates on National 
Cemetery Administration issues. On November 18, the Committee will tour 
the Baltimore National Cemetery, 5501 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, 
Maryland, from approximately 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., and reconvene at 
the hotel for a business session, including discussions of committee 
recommendations, future meeting sites, and potential agenda topics for 
upcoming meetings.
    Time will be allocated for receiving public comments at 1 p.m. on 
November 18. Public comments will be limited to three minutes each. 
Individuals wishing to make oral statements before the Committee will 
be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals who 
speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the 
time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting record.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit written 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting to Mr. 
Michael Nacincik, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, National Cemetery Administration (41C2), 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4904202a21282c256727093f28672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcb1959f949d9990d292bc8a9dd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>. In the public's 
communications with the Committee, the writers must identify themselves 
and state the organizations, associations, or persons they represent. 
Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting should contact 
Mr. Nacincik at (202) 461-6240.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24313 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2415** 

MCELROY COAL COMPANY; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY , Petitioner s ,

v.
MIKEL C. TRADER ; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , Respondent s .

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

. ( 12

- 0658

- BLA )

Submitted : June 30 , 2014 Decided: July 11, 2014

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia , for Petitioner s . Heath M. Long, PAWLOWSKI, BILONICK & LONG, Ebensburg, Pennsylvania ; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg , Gary K. Stearman , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wash ington, D.C. , for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: McElroy Coal Company and Consolidation Coal Company petition for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administr ative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and
is without reversible error . Acc ordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal
Co. v. Trader , No. 12

- 0658

- BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
MEMORANDUM

TO: SIP Fix Rulemaking Do cket, ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0107

FROM: Lisa Sutton

DATE: September 20, 2010

SUBJECT: Call with Alaska on SIP Fix Rules

This documents my telephone conversation today with Rebecca Smith, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC ), (907) 465-5121. I confirmed that the due date for the proposal's "30-day letters" in response to our SIP Call proposal is still Mon. 10/4/10, even though the comment period for the FIP proposal extends to Thurs. 10/14/10.

Rebecca and I reviewed Alaska's anticipated sche dule for revision of its PSD regulations as well as our general process for SIP submittals.

LS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6360

KEITH ERVIN FRAZIER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:13-hc-02010-F)

Submitted: July 30, 2015 Decided: August 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Ervin Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Ervin Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for 

reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 

369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Frazier has not made the requisite showing.* Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * Because Frazier’s informal brief does not challenge the 

bases for the district court’s dispositions, but instead argues 

the merits of his petition, Frazier has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s orders. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
# C_2011034EN.01000701.xml

| 3.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/7

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 34/08

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 9 November 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 62275 |
| Decision number | : | 438/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Type of measure | : | Cross-subsidisation and capital injection |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

9 November 2010

Case number

:

62275

Decision number

:

438/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Type of measure

:

Cross-subsidisation and capital injection

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
42436.

#### STONE v. CITIZENS CASUALTY COMPANY et al.

Submitted November 8, 1966

Decided December 2, 1966

Rehearing denied December 15, 1966

*Wade H. Leonard,*for appellant.

*8haw, Stolz & Fletcher, Irwin W. Stolz, Jr.,*for appellees.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The compromise settlement of this workmen’s compensation claim was made and approved in accordance with all of the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 114-106 (Ga. L. 1920, p. 178; Ga. L. 1931, pp. 7, 43), as amended by Ga. L. 1963, pp. 141, 142, which bars amendment, modification or change of the agreement or a change of condition hearing under § 114-709. See *Proctor v. Dixie Bell Mills, Inc.,*113 Ga. App. 787 (2) (149 SE2d 550). The settlement stipulated that it was in full, final and complete settlement of any and all claims arising out of the compensable injury; therefore, the Superior Court of Catoosa County did not err in its judgment affirming the award of the board denying the claim for medical expenses incurred after the approval of the settlement.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
§ 1249.16 Withdrawal of Eligible Book-entry Enterprise Securities for conversion to definitive form. ( a ) Eligible Book-entry Enterprise Securities may be withdrawn from the Book-entry System by requesting delivery of like Definitive Enterprise Securities.
( b ) A Federal Reserve Bank shall, upon receipt of appropriate instructions to withdraw Eligible Book-entry Enterprise Securities from book-entry in the Book-entry System, convert such securities into Definitive Enterprise Securities and deliver them in accordance with such instructions. No such conversion shall affect existing interests in such Enterprise Securities.
( c ) All requests for withdrawal of Eligible Book-entry Enterprise Securities must be made prior to the maturity or date of call of the securities.
( d ) Enterprise Securities which are to be delivered upon withdrawal may be issued in either registered or bearer form, to the extent permitted by the applicable Securities Documentation.