alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10-F-1
                                                                  --------------


                                April 13, 2000



Mr. Elbert O. Hand
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Hartmarx Corporation
101 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606


Dear Bert:

Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 1,
1996 (the "Employment Agreement"), between you, as Executive, and Hartmarx
Corporation.

Hartmarx Corporation has been authorized by the Compensation and Stock Option
Committee of the Board of Directors to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:

        The Agreement Period is hereby extended for two years and shall
        continue in effect through December 31, 2002.

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

Please sign both copies of this letter where indicated below evidencing your
agreement to this amendment. When fully executed, this letter will serve as an
amendment to the Employment Agreement.


                                       Sincerely,
                                       HARTMARX CORPORATION


                                       Raymond F. Farley, Chairman
Agreed and Accepted this               Compensation and Stock Option
13th day of April, 2000                Committee of the Board of Directors


---------------------------
         E.O. Hand
§ 1412.6 Permissible indemnification payments. ( a ) A System institution may make or agree to make reasonable indemnification payments to an IRP with respect to an administrative proceeding or civil action initiated by the FCA if: ( 1 ) The System institution's board of directors, in good faith, determines in writing after due investigation and consideration that the IRP acted in good faith and in a manner he/she believed to be in the best interests of the institution;
( 2 ) The System institution's board of directors, in good faith, determines in writing after due investigation and consideration that the payment of such expenses will not materially adversely affect the institution's safety and soundness;
( 3 ) The indemnification payments do not constitute prohibited indemnification payments as that term is defined in § 1412.2(l); and
( 4 ) The IRP agrees in writing to reimburse the System institution, to the extent not covered by payments from insurance or bonds purchased pursuant to § 1412.2(l)(2), for that portion of the advanced indemnification payments which subsequently become prohibited indemnification payments, as defined herein.
( b ) An IRP requesting indemnification payments shall not participate in any way in the board's discussion and approval of such payments; *provided, however,* that such IRP may present his/her request to the board and respond to any inquiries from the board concerning his/her involvement in the circumstances giving rise to the administrative proceeding or civil action.
( c ) In the event that a majority of the members of the board of directors are named as respondents in an administrative proceeding or civil action and request indemnification, the remaining members of the board may authorize independent legal counsel to review the indemnification request and provide the remaining members of the board with a written opinion of counsel as to whether the conditions delineated in paragraph (a) of this section have been met. If independent legal counsel opines that said conditions have been met, the remaining members of the board of directors may rely on such opinion in authorizing the requested indemnification.
( d ) In the event that all of the members of the board of directors are named as respondents in an administrative proceeding or civil action and request indemnification, the board shall authorize independent legal counsel to review the indemnification request and provide the board with a written opinion of counsel as to whether the conditions delineated in paragraph (a) of this section have been met. If independent legal counsel opines that said conditions have been met, the board of directors may rely on such opinion in authorizing the requested indemnification.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Luke Annells

XM2 LLC

3585 S Vermont Avenue, #7367

Los Angeles, CA 90007

Re: FAA–2015–7036

Dear Mr. Annells:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4(ii)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               STRYKER CORPORATION


                         -------------------------------



                  1. The present name of the corporation is Stryker Corporation.
The registered office of the corporation is 2725 Fairfield Road, Kalamazoo,
Michigan 49002.

                  2. The former name of the corporation was Orthopedic Frame
Company.

                  3. The date of filing the original Articles of Incorporation
was February 20, 1946.

                  4. Section A of Article III of the Articles of Incorporation,
as amended and restated to date, is hereby amended to increase the authorized
Common Stock to 500,000,000 shares, and as so amended shall read in its entirety
as follows:

         A. The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the
         corporation shall have authority to issue is 500,500,000 to be divided
         into two classes consisting of 500,000 shares of a class designated
         "Preferred Stock", of the par value of One Dollar ($1) per share, and
         500,000,000 shares of a class designated "Common Stock", of the par
         value of Ten Cents ($.10) per share.

                  5. This amendment was duly adopted by the shareholders of the
corporation on the 19th day of April, 2000 in accordance with the provisions of
subsection (3) of Section 611 of the Business Corporation Act of Michigan.

Dated this 19th day of April, 2000.

                                               STRYKER CORPORATION



                                               By   /s/ John W. Brown
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    John W. Brown, Chairman,
                                                     President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer
42621.

#### KAPLAN v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY.

Submitted March 6, 1967

Decided March 9, 1967.

*Lewis & Javetz, Emanuel Lewis,*for appellant.

*Brannen, Clark & Hester, Perry Brannen,*for appellee.

Eberhardt, Judge.

The insurance company’s motion for directed verdict was based upon three grounds, all relating to the provisions of the insurance contract. We need only consider one of these grounds to affirm the judgment below.

The liability of the company under the contract is, by its terms, made subject to the conditions stated therein. Condition 5 provides: “Books and records. The insured shall keep records of all the insured property in such manner that the company can accurately determine therefrom the amount of loss.”

It is admitted in the brief for the insured that “[i]f an in*366sured keeps no books, the insurance company has a complete defense to an action on a policy requiring records.” The insured contends, however, that if he did in fact keep books and records, then the adequacy of his records required by the policy is a matter for determination by a jury, citing *American Cas. Co. v. Cohen,*40 Ga. App. 593 (151 SE 56) and Lumbermen’s Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson Lumber Co., 53 F2d 940 (5th Cir.).

The insured did maintain a set of books or business records from which the amount of cash taken from the safe could be determined. But it is undisputed that there is no record of any kind relative to the diamond ring—nothing as to when or from whom it was acquired, the weight, cut or quality of the stone, its cost or value. Perhaps the record-keeping requirement of this policy does not demand all of this, but no records simply cannot be equated with adequate records for determining the amount of the loss, and as to property on which no records were made and kept there is no insurance. Cf. *Continental Ins. Co. v. Binford-Sutton Drug Co.,*33 Ga. App. 111 (125 SE 384).

Condition 5 of this policy cannot be circumvented by an assertion that there is no place in the ordinary set of business records where personal items might be appropriately entered, and that it would be “most unusual” to expect a merchant to keep a record of personal items customarily kept in his safe on his business premises. Condition 5 does not require records of inventory, cash on hand, accounts receivable, fixtures, or assets—it requires records of “all the *insured property.”*If the ring was to be “insured property” within the meaning of the insurance contract, as insured contends it was, then he must have made and kept a record of it “in such manner that the company can accurately determine therefrom the amount of loss.” This is his contract.

The contention that the court erred in not submitting to the jury the question of whether the business records kept by the insured were adequate is without merit, and the court did not err in directing the verdict and entering judgment thereon.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Banyan Acquisition Corp. (the
 “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 31, 2022 |  | /s/Keith Jaffee                                          
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Keith Jaffee                                             
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ George Courtot                                       
|                     |  | George Courtot                                           
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)





1
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

CHARLES EDWARD SMITH *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

Misc. AG Docket No. 4 5

September Term, 20 22

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension, filed by Bar

Counsel and the Respondent, Charles Edward Smith, on January 17, 2023, it is this 23rd

day of January, 2023

,

ORDERED , by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition is

GRANTED and, effective February 18, 2023, the Respondent, Charles Edward Smith

, is

temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pursuant to

Maryland Rule 19

- 738(e) pe nding further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED

, that, on February 18, 2023, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name

of Charles Edward Smith from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact

to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761(b) ; and it is further

ORDERED

, that the January 10, 2023 Show Cause Order issued pursuant to

Maryland Rule 19

- 738(d ) is satisfied.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts

Senior Ju stice

*Chief Justice Fader did not participate in consideration of this matter.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10-F-2
                                                                  --------------


                                April 13, 2000


Mr. Homi B. Patel
President and Chief Operating Officer
Hartmarx Corporation
101 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606



Dear Homi:

Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 1,
1996 (the "Employment Agreement"), between you, as Executive, and Hartmarx
Corporation.

Hartmarx Corporation has been authorized by the Compensation and Stock Option
Committee of the Board of Directors to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:

       The Agreement Period is hereby extended for two years and shall
       continue in effect through December 31, 2002.

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

Please sign both copies of this letter where indicated below evidencing your
agreement to this amendment. When fully executed, this letter will serve as an
amendment to the Employment Agreement.


                                       Sincerely,
                                       HARTMARX CORPORATION


                                       Raymond F. Farley, Chairman
Agreed and Accepted this               Compensation and Stock Option
13th day of April, 2000                Committee of the Board of Directors



-----------------------------
        Homi B. Patel
<PAGE>



                             DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
                  U.S. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS COMMAND
                          ACQUISITION CENTER-WASHINGTON
                2481 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22331-0700


[LOGO] REPLY TO ATTENTION OF                                             [LOGO]

Acquisition Division B                                    21 December 1998


H. Power Corporation
Attn:  Mr. Arthur Kaufman,
  Vice President
60 Montgomery Street
Belleville, NJ 07109

SUBJECT: Modification 03 to DAAB07-98-3-6003 (Other Transaction) for Fuel
Cell/Battery Hybrid

1. This document constitutes Modification 03 to the subject Other Transaction
Agreement between H. Power Corporation and U.S. Army CECOM Acquisition Center -
Washington, under the terms of Article III, paragraph C.3 and Article V,
paragraph A.1.

2. The agreement is modified to obligate incremental funding in the amount of
$131,966. ACRN BB is hereby established as follows:

ACRN BB:  219 2040 0000 962 7530 P622705.H11.04.11.00 2552 9JC804 CY9JCA34YIA
000000 S28043                                                        $131,966.00

3. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.


                                          /s/ Peggy R. Melanson
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Peggy A. Melanson
                                          Grants & Cooperative Agreement Officer
                                          United States of America
Exhibit 32.1

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I,
Bernard T. Marren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: 6/26/09



/s/    BERNARD T. MARRENBernard T. Marren,Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the September 30, 1997
10-Q and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             574
<SECURITIES>                                     22762
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1897
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   463
<PP&E>                                            4663
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            15833
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       12129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28326
<SALES>                                          24752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24752
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3064
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2631

AN ACT

To provide that the actuarial value of the prescription drug benefits offered to Medicare eligible enrollees by a plan under the Federal employees

health benefits program shall be at least equal tothe actuarial value of the prescription drug benefits offered by such plan to its enrollees generally.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2631

AN ACT

To provide that the actuarial value of the prescription drug

benefits offered to Medicare eligible enrollees by a plan

under the Federal employees health benefits program

shall be at least equal to the actuarial value of the

prescription drug benefits offered by such plan to its

enrollees generally.
2

•HR 2631 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEGOTIATIONS BY THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

4 MANAGEMENT.

5 Section 8902 of title 5, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(p)(1) A contract may not be made or a plan ap8 proved which does not offer to Medicare eligible enrollees

9 prescription drug benefits the actuarial value of which is

10 at least equal to the actuarial value of the prescription

11 drug benefits which are offered to enrollees under the plan

12 generally.

13 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the Director of

14 the Office of Personnel Management shall establish proc15 esses and methods for determining the actuarial value of

16 prescription drug benefits.’’.

17 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

18 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

19 respect to contract years beginning after the date of enact20 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Stock Certificate Border Graphics]

        Not Valid Unless Countersigned by Transfer Agent
        Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Nevada


     Number                                            Shares

  [No. of Cert]                                 [No. of Shares]


                   NEW PARADIGM PRODUCTIONS, INC.
           Authorized Common Stock: 24,000,000 Shares
                     Par Value: $.001


THIS CERTIFIES THAT  [Name of Shareholder]

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF  [Number of Shares]

      Shares of NEW PARADIGM PRODUCTIONS, INC. Common Stock

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by
the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

     Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:  [date of Certificate]


/s/Jody St. Clair                              /s/Jody St. Clair
     Secretary                                 President


                 [Graphic of Corporate Seal]

[Border Graphics]

Interwest Transfer Co. Inc. P.O. Box 17136/Salt Lake City, Utah 84117

Countersigned & Registered ______________________________