### Section 1.fl RevIsion 0 

# ~3Z I Date Jun 23, 1978 Page lofi 1.o ARIZONA 

### SOURCE TEST POLICY The Bureau of AirQuality Control, acting for the 

### Director of the Department of Health Services, is responsible for the determination of each regulated air pollution source’s capability and continuing ability to complywith air p~llutant emission regulations adopted by the Director pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes § 36—1700 et seq.; and any terms of conditional permits issued by the Arizona Air Pollution Control Hearing Board, for all sources under the jurisdiction of the Department in mat ters of air pollutioncontrol. Mass emissions tests and/or visible emissions observations by qualified agency visible emissions evaluators shall be required to assure tha.t each source Is compliantwith all applicable emission limitations as a prerequisite to the issuance or renewal of (air pollution source) operating permits, unless Bureau engineering analysis and field inspection provide defensible assurance of compli’ance. The Bureau may require additional source testing at any time during the permit period that lack of compliance with the applicable regulations is demonstrated or suspected. Regulated air pollution sources shall conduct any required compliance verification mass emissions testing or contract with qualified independent source testing organizations for such testing in accordance with Bureau approved methods. The Bureau shall maintain the capability to conduct air pollution source testing, analysis, and reporting for evaluation of air pollution sources operated by the State or its political subdivisions. The Bureau shall provide consultation services relating to air pollu tion source testing and analysis to Bureau, regulated industry, and Arizona political subdivision agency personnel.

### Section 1.1 Revision 0

, 

# .-,9 Date Jun 23, 1978 /-c2. I 

### Page 1 of 2 1.1 SOURCE TEST QUALIFICATION All source testing and field evaluation for determination 

### of the compliance status of regulated air pollution sources requires 

### the on— site verification by qualified Bureau representatives. 1.1.1 AGENCY OBSERVER REQUIREMENTS 

### Bureau representatives assigned to source test verification are required, byjob description, to have a degree In engineering or related air pollution control discipline from an accredited college, or Its equi valent. Each agency observer undergoes on—the-job training and 

### is subject to technical supervision by the Bureau’s Supervisor of Source Testing to assure Initial and cqntinuing proficiency. Each observer Is also required to maintain current certification as a “visible emissions 

# (~ evaluator”. Verification of compliance to non—emission related regula—

.tory or permit requirements 

### may be provided by other qualified Bureau specialists. 1.1.2 MASS EMISSIONS TEST TRAINING When feasible, Bureau personnel assigned to Independent source test verification shall complete Environmental Protection Agency training sources covering the applicable reference methods of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. As a minimum, all key personnel shall attend Course No. 450, “Sampling for Particulate Emissions”. The Bureau shall conduct periodic stack sampling training courses on approved test methods for Department, county air pollution control agency, and regulated industry personnel. Course content may vary depending on 

### the needs of the participants. Typical course subject areas are showi~ in Exhibit 1.1.2—1.

### Section 1.1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 2 of 2 1.1.3 VISIBLE EMISSIONS ~VALUATOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION 

### The Bureau 

### shall provr?de, or arrange for, training and certifica tion of qualified visible ~misslons evaluators for evaluation or compli ance with applicable,vlsib~le emlss.ians regulations. Detailed training relating to visible emissl~ns observations shall be presented semi annually, and certiflcatio~i testing shall be conducted quarterly. Equipment utilized fc~r 

### visible emissions evaluator training shall be operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with Exhibit 1.1.3-1. To receive certif1caI~1on as a qualified observer, a candidate must be tested and demonstrate the ability to assign opacity readings In 5 percent Increments to 25 different black plumes and 25 dIfferent white plumed, with an error not to exceed 15 percent opacity on any one reading and an average error not ~o exceed 7.5 percent opacity in each category. Successful candidates are issued certification indicating qualification as a visible emissions evdluator (Exhibit 1.1.3-2), which must be renewed at least every six months~



# f

# 1!OPERATION, ~~A24C!, AND CALI3RACION OF t~ S)~ER ~iISSION GERERAT~
A. Introduction To fuLEiU its 

### functi~n as a training and certification device for inspection and enforcement personnel. The smoke generator is designed to provide an effluent of black and white smoke of kno~m opacity. Th~ black smoke is generated through a fire box chamber La which the toluene flow is controlled. This produces incomplete comoustion and varies the oucout opacity through the stack. White smoke is ~roduced by’ injecting dieseL fuel. into a hot muffler which vaporizes the fuel and creates a white effluent output through the stack. A photocell. and incandescent light source is used to measure the density’ of the plume,. The photocel.l output is transmitted to a strip chart recorder for visual and permanent record of the output opacity.
3. Zau4oment the smoke emission generator system consists of the following: 1. PhotoceLl, Selenium type having a spectral response similar to the human eye.

~ 2. Lamp, 11.5-125 VAC, 50-watt incaodesceac, reflective flood.

3. Strip chart recorders, ,Sristol and Escerline Angus, 0—100 my range. 4. Constant voltage regulator, 120 YAC constant output voltage, 250 voLt amp capacity. 5. Smoke emission generator, Trailer, fire box, fuel Hues. 6. Gas generator, Portable, 1300 watt generator.
C. Recuired EPA Smoke Generator Soecifinat~oos Any smoke generator used for the purposes of smoke test certification shall be equinoed mith a smoke meter installed to measure opacity across the diameter of the smoke generator stack, the smoke nets: cutput shall display in-stack opacity based uoon a path Length equal to the stack exit aiamecer, on a fulL 0 to LOG pertenc char: :ecor~er scale. The snake neter and oocical design and performance shall neec the specifica tions shown below:


### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 

### Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 1 of 8

### tncaedes~eut tamp 

### operated a: ±5~ nominal vaJ.tage Photo~Lc ~(dayUght spectral. response of the hisn eye) 1.57. eazimum total angle L57. maximum total angle 

## ± ~ opacity maximum 

## ± 1% opacity. 30 minutes S seconds

+ 27, filters
0. Performance Soecifications of A:izona ~auionent 1.. A constant voltage regulation to the incandescent lamp of + 1% regulation. For a

## ± 13 voLt line voltage change. 2. A selenium photocell stable in the photopic light range. 3. Strip chart recorder with

## ± 17. accuracy, 

### 0-100 my. 

### 4. Angle of view of 12° on. photocell. 5. Angle of projection of 8° p.. la~o. 6. Calibration error less than Z.5~ with neutral density-filters. 

### 7. Drift is 

## ± 17. after 30-minute warm-up on full scale. 8. Output of photocell a. Response time less than 5 seconds b Span drift a~ full, scale (two opacity) less than 

## ± 17..
E. Z~A Physical Design Specifications for the Smoke Generator 1. The angle of view Construction geometry on the angle of view of the photocell Ls not to exceed 1.50. the total angle of ~“Lew can be calculated from 

### e-~ I arctan d/lL where + • total, angle of view, d the sum of the photocell diameter and the diameter of the limiting aperture, and L the dis tance from the photocell to the limiting aperture.



### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 2 of 8 1.. Light source
2. SpectraL responsa of photocell
3. Angle of view ~4.. Angle of protection. 5. Calibration error 6. Zero and span drif: 7. Response time 8. Neutral density fil.ters~.. ~Øim augi.e of projection Construction geometry for the angle of projection of the lamp is 1.ei~ then 15°. the total. angle may be calcuj,~~~ from~... 2 azcra’u d/2!..

~ F. Generatj~ of 3lack and hite Smoke

1. 2lack Smoke A tvo-c~s~a. incinerator or “fire box” is used to burntoluene with the amount. of air for combustion fLied. The fuel flow is varied by using a control. valve Lu the fuel line. !xcasa fuel uses incomplete combustion using unburned carbon to leave the chamber as black smoke. The variation of fuel. effectively causes different ratios of air to fuel. The change of combustion efficiency varies the output opacity of the plume as it La drawn threagn the flue, mixed with dilution air by the ind~ctjo~ fan, and forced up through the stack. (see Zigure I.) 2. White Smoke White smoke is induced by injecting diesel fuel through a needle valve into the exhaust maui~o1d of a portable gasoline engine. The diesel fuel is atomized and vaporized by the (10000 F) high temperature, high velocity exhaust g sea of the engine. The opacity of the smoke is con troLled by varying the L~je~tj~~ rate of the fuel, into the exhaust lice. The smoke from the exhaust is drawn through the same induction fan that is used for black smoke7 mi.xad with dilution air, and forced up through the stack. (see. ?igure 1.)
C. transmissomac~. the plume is forced up through the stack past a transmissonecer which consLst~ aizpl’, of a photocell and a light source sensitive to the phoeoptj~ light range similar to the human eye. The output of the photocell is directly pr000rtional to the amount of Light falling i~pon the cell. 

### Smoke scops and fans (see Figure 1) prevent smoke from the stack coming in contact with the cell or light source and thereby affecting the true reading. The output. of the cell is connected to a strip chart recorder calibrated from 0-100 miLlivolts full scale. the photocell output is read directly on the scrip chart recorder in opacLty or Riuglemanc equivalents. The light source is kept at a constant Light intensity using a constant voltage regulator. This prevents any inherent errors caused by light intensity variation resulting from line voltage changes. The photocell output is thus otly affected by the changing plume de~sicy. 

## a. CaliSration the calibration procedure is very simple and accurate to perform. The ele.tronjcs of the smoke emission generator are turned on and aLLowed to stabilize for 30 minutes. Then the system zero (lO0~ oPacity) La set by 

### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 3 of 8luck .~k. pro4acad b~ batatn;*. ~4 vtg~ Lace ~iei.~c .Lz La t~a lice ck.r. ~iCc a~ac~U produced b~ Injcertuq dLe.eL feeL Leto eukacag oeetioLd e~d LI La veQrlz.d. tapcf La. coodeoced I.e th eodo~ oooLicLd L.adloç le IZI .CacZ. ~kaamc bleek cud m*cr cooke lath raLue, at. dtawo Lace Ike sceck h1 cu taduced cia Lao. lath coLor, era IOU i.parcC.17.

- . TXaoeaic car Caretat. at light carte. and phatoca U. kading at erack eLL~iaang.La Iaka4 Wear Ike ~p.aeaa Ike e;n Ike chegoreLL a pade. ~ie. doo.U7 La ~eeo. e,corOd cc ck. arcar Ladicaciag purarnac opaciq at Liugiaraa ecadia;. CaUbe.cioe- paLcca 0.s~e~acoLf LOG Ltghc cc cod oocar car to 100 cc fulL tca.Li 10, 20, LQ, ~0 63~ opacig~ cc, caliaracad vi.th graccar deucteL DcLII 

### Luger, cod za .hLaaacocar eyecar ‘~riio.

!.‘~0Xt S~CP~ LiGht SQ1JPCZ (I

~ STA~X Figure 

### L
~E~U 

# C)

C) OILUTIOM AtI

WHITE SMOKE cRATING ~OUIPMWT 

# I I

ccc~rQCtIj.

I! 

### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 TRA~4OME~E~ 

### Revision 0

Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 4 of 8blocking the tight source to the photocell. Sy,ste~m full scale (zero opacity) is adjusted with f’.ill tight intensity and using a potentiomacer in th system to set the full scale recorder deflection, the error is then checked for 1 hour for zero and span drift. The zero and svan drift over this period should be less than 

## ± 1% error. A.ftar verifi cation of span and drift commliance, Wracten neutral density filters of different densities are inserted into the tight path A total, of 5 non-consecutive readings of the different filters (10, 20, 40, 50, 63, 30~) are recorded., A calibration curve is then drawn from this data and a new scala is placed on the strip chart recorder. The cali bration error m~sr be less than + 3~, of full scale. Calibrat±on is checked before each lab session by reinserting the neutral density filters and validating the correct reading on the strip chart recorder. the design specifications for smoke generators proposed by EPA are very restrictive. The Arinona snok generator is within all tolerances and speciiicat~ons of the EPA proposed performance standards. The output accuracy with .the new modifications on the smoke emission gen erator have made the Arizona Department of aealth Services generator a model that can be used by other agencies to bring their equipment up to the new EPA pro~osad standards.
t. Maintenance Schedule 

## o mouths oil change, gas generator inspect for fuel, leaks 1. year repack wheel bearings, inspect tires, gas’ engine tune-up & oil change, check hyazaulic fluid, oil, fans, check exhaust system, check running lights, safety inspecrio~ of trailer
J. Calibration Schedule 3 months recal.i’orate electronics every 3 months or prior to each smoke school per cali’oracjon procedure
K. Onerarino tnscructions Park smoke emission generator in a location free of obstructions near the stack. aaise stack to upright positLon using hydraulic jack. Connect AC power line to unit. the main power tine should be direct for blower motors and general controls. A constant voLtage regulator is used to regulate the volage to the lignc source and cc power the chart recorders. (See Figure 2) Rookup cannon. connecter from grey box to black control box en smoke generator. Install photocell, and 

### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 

### Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 

### Page 5 of 8Lignc sourte on stack. This is acomplLshed by- threading the caps onto the pipe. Connect input 1.ead to light source and counec~ photocell leads to span control box. (grey box) This step can be done prior to raising stack, turn power switch on at black control panel on generator to turn on fans. Start recorders and allow smoke generator equipment I! hour waz~ up bela checking calibr~tjon. Checjc calibration. White Smoke Generation 1. Start generator and ~llow to warn up. 2. turn control switch to po~jtjo~ 3 and adjust fuel control for desired opacity. 3. Run at lower opacities until generator 

### is adequately warmed for higher onacities. 4.. Caution do not run 607. and higher opacity for extended periods. Black. Smoke Generation I. Be sure white s~i~ ~ ~ off. 2. Turn control switch to position I. and verify ignitars a operating. Adjust if needed. 3. turn toluene fuel on and leave control switch in position 1. until fuel ignites. 4. After ignition turn control switch to position 2 (run). 5. Initial startup of fire-box requires approximately 30 minutes ‘Jar~p to stabilize fire-box tamoeracure. 6. Do not run an Ringlemann 3 or higher for extended periods. Initial checkou’t and setup will take an hour or nore to allow the electronics to stabilize heating of the fire-box aad varup of the generator.
L. Smoke school students should be positioned approximately 50 feet from the generator with th in backs to. the sun and with an unobstructed view of the stack. It is reco~ended that a few practice runs be conducted with both the black and white smoke. this will allow the students to become familiar with the plume characteristics and cond~tioo then to the visible emission qualification forn and to record the opacity when the horn is sounded. (?igure 3) The practice runs should cover the full range of ?J.nglenaun or opacity settings and after every horn the reading can be given to the students. the practice run also accomplishes full check out of operating opacities and allows the operator adequate time to refamilisrjze himself with fuel adjustments for the different settings.
K. Recameended backup suppLies. and equipment when conducting smoke school. I. spare lano and ~hotocell S. pioe wrench 12” 2. spare igniters 9. 3/~ ~on P.13. witS hitch and 3. gasoline, diesel fuel andtoluene electrical. connector ~ooku~.
~‘. tool box 10. at least a 10 lb CO2 nu1t~.— 5. clean rags purpose dry criemical fire 6. funnel extinguisher is absolutely 7. fuses required during all operations of the smoke geueracLng equioment. Exhibit 1.1.3—1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Pace 6 of S

## L,9-47’

~



### ~1



# C)

C) Exhibit 1.1.3—1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23~ 1978 Page 7 of 8 

### Con7~o/ 

# ~ ———-j i~o VAC Recep7’ac/e

ELECTRICAL BLOCK DIAGRAM SMOKE EMISSIONS GENE1~ATOR Figure 2

# C) AffH i~tlon ~RIZON~ OEPAPThiEN1 ~ ~EM.Th SERVIcES Suresu of Mr 9ueI~ty con~roI VISIBLE EMISSIGI4S ~JALIFICATI0N REC~D

TOTAL Blqck ~•viat [On. 25 BlackS _.WhifaS_4 2_ 9ueIIfi.d: Yes

— No

— Date



### Exhibit 1.1.3—1 Revision 0 Date June 23, 1978 Page 8 of 8 Run No. 8LAOC SMQ(E Record oil emissIons to near.st 3% opacIty.
WHITE S’O(E ~r

—— 

# -1—-

- -



# ~ ~ j~j~

~ C 

# L

~ C C C C C C D,~ .~.! ~ .2.2 O~i 2.2 ~ C ~ — — c > BC

— — C 55

— = C S SC

— — .— ~. — a a

— ~. — a a

— ~. . a a

— ~ a— a a 0 5 Ct

— — V C C

— — V S C

— — 05 CV

— — a ~~aa s s a a a s s a a > S a a as s 

### 58~°~S °8’~

~ C 1.5

~

201 7 

# ~1::~r:= ;zz= 

# i---

-_ 

# ~:~z~’ 8 V. 9• 22 W 23 

# ~F:==::z==

WhIle DevIatIons
Exemincr TOTAL

23-cCmm-~.~

### Section 1.2 Revision 1 Date Sep 30, 1978
1.2 SOURCE TEST PLANNING AND APPROVAL Mass emissions tests for regulated pollutants is required of all sources subject to air pollution control for verification of compliance with applicable Arizona regulations, unless compliance can be assured and documented by agency engineering analysis confirmed by on—site inspec tion. Stationary sources are notified and must provide acceptable test facilities and test plans for Bureau approval prior to the conduct of compliance or investigative tests. Minimum facilities for stack sampling are prescribed in ERhibit 1.2—1. Verification of compliance is required for all major emission points within the source facilities as a prerequisite to the issuance or renewal of air pollution control operation permits. Advance notification of test schedules is required to facilitate Bureau observation of test perfor mance. Major sources having multiple emission points submit facility test schedules assuring annual testing of major emission sources and multiyear rotation of minor emission point verification. When identical or essentially similar air pollution control devices are utilized, compli ance testing may be authorized on a sampling basis. Test plans are reviewed by the Bureau to assure the technical and legal acceptability of test results. Bureau approval of test plans and any approval of variations from published test procedures is recorded and documented (Exhibit 1.2-2).STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Bureau of Mr Quality Control Stack Sampi ing Facilities The following items with definitions, specifications ara sketches con stitute minimum requirements for safe and accessible stack sampl ing facilities.

• Power Source:
a. 115 voit, IS amp, single phase, 60 hertz, alternating current. b. Power source located on the platform and at the base of the stack with grounded weather proof outlet. 2. Sampling ports:
a. For round stacks, two ports, 900 apart* (u~ Showr. in figure I) located eight to ten stack diameters a~jve bends, inlets, or cons~tri.ctions and~at least two stack d!~rneters below stack exit. b. For rectangular stacks or ducts, the ports shall be located in a line across one accessible side of the stack or duct. This line shall be perpendicular to the direction of flow. See figure 2. c. Ports are standard industrial flanged pipe, 3 inch diameter; or 3 inch pipe with standard external threads; ports ex tend no more than six inches from stack on outside (unless additional length is required for installation of’ gate valve, see d. below), and are flush on inside of stack. d. Ports•must be able to support a vertical shear load (from above or below) of two hundred pounds and a radial tension load (outward along stack diameter) of ffty pounds. e. Ports to be equipped with gate valve, whe, stack contains dangerous gases or when under positive pressure or high temperature. 3. Work platform:*
a. Adequate room and strength for two people and one hundred fifty pounds of test equipment. The platform should sHow adequate access to each port from both sides. b. Safe guard—rail on platform and safe ladder (or other Suit able access) leading to platform. c. Additional dimensions and specifications are listed below in paragraphs four and five and are pointed out on the accompany ing sketches.

* If the sum of the inside diameter of the stack and one wall thickness plus port extension exceeds ten feet, four ports and a .3600 work platform are required. The ports are to be located along two diameters, 900 apart.


### Exhibit 1.2—1 Revision 0 Date Sep 30, 1978 Paqe 

### 1 of 54. Dimensions and explanations (see Figure iTypical Stack Sampling Facilities, Top View”):
a. Ladder well

— if a ladder is used for access to platform, the opening should not be located within three feet of the port. b. Minimum platform walk space

— a minimum of three feet of plat form work space is required on each side of the port. c. Minimum horizontal sample box clearance

— a minimum of two feet of horizontal clearance is required, on both sides of the port, from the stack outward to a distance of at least one stack diameter plus three feet. d. Nominal port diameter

— 3 inches. e. Maximum external port extension

— 6 inches (Note exception in Section 2c above). I. Minimum annular platform width

— the platform width must be at least 1~hree feet. 5. Dimensions and explanations (see Figure 3 ‘Typical Stack Sampling Facilities, Elevation. View”i:
a.. Distance to nearest obstruction above port

— a clearance of one foot above the sample port, extending outward a distance of ~t least one stack diameter plus three feet is required. b. Distance to nearest obstruction radially out from port

— this measurement is the outward distance mentioned in 4c, Sa, and 5c, and extends to a distance of at !east one stack •diameter plus three feet. c. Minimum vertical sample box clearance

— a vertical clearance of at least two feet below the port and dxtending outward as mentioned In Sb is required. d. Distance between port and platform

— Nie port should be located no less than four feet, not more than six feet, above the platform..

Exhibit 

### 1.2—1 Revision 0 Date Sep 30, 1978 Paqe 2 of ~apa~



# \J

Figure 1 

### Exhibit 1.2~1 Revision 0 Date Sep 30, 1978 Page 3 of 5 TYPICAL STACK SAM?ILtC FACflJT~S



### TV~

4

2 porte

~: ports flush 

### ~.th iusid.e of stack

p1 rtfor,nC-o~~iii~.Or*<~om-~.(I)Q•-~U,—-~.m000~~*1-.~c~~.ui~~NEARESTUPSTREAMDISTURBANCECJ4—2Stack.......4qDiametersCNEARESTDOWNSTREAMDISTURBANCE~8StackDiametersToporEndViewElevationI•I.II----.t---I----•I•i’II•.IId=D2nD=depthn=no.ofportsiiFigure2.PORTIOCATIONSFORRECTANGULARSTACKSANDDUCTS.-~~Z~mp.~CDL~C*<~mm—U)0UiCl)-.-~.CD0c+.O0~-%~0-4‘rn~fcALSTAC)~LINO)AOIItit~bELEVATIONVIEW.1’-itetendet~Elleareatobotru~tj~~‘Ovepor.tdietastoneareatobetr~ction~adiaU~routfromport.-1-TIC-ICD•ium~unverticalsampleboxcl~urbJ~ce———••-•distanc~betweenportandplatform

### PLANNING REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING.

I. SOURCE INFORMATION 

# ç~ NAME

_______________ 

### PERSON TO CONTACT II. TEST TEAM INFORMATION NAME (Cu~

______________________ 

### ADDRESS

_______ 

### PERSON TO CONTACT

________________ 

### TELEPHONE

______ 

### II!. GAS STREAM INFORMATION CONTROL SYSTEM TO BE SAMPLED (TYPE, SIZE, LOCATION)

POLLUTANTS NUMBER OF POINTS TOTAL TEST TEST METHOD SAMPLED TIME USED
2 3 STACK DIAMETERS TO FLOW DISTURBANCE: UPSTREAM ______________DOWNSTREAM

_________ 

### SAMPLING STATION COMPLIES WITH DEPARTMENT MINIMUM STANDARDS?

____________________ 

### DEFICIENCIES TO BE CORRECTED

______________________________________________________ 

### STACK TEMPERATURE (APPROX) ________________________% 

### WATER (APPROX)

____________ 

### STACK GAS VELOCITY (APPROX) ________________________SIZE OF STACK, DUCT

__________ 

### IV. DIAGRAM OF EQUIPMENT BEING TESTED.



# C) Exhibit 1.~—2 Revision 0 

### Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 1 

### of 1 ADDRESS TELEPHONE



# C)

### Section 1.3 RevisIon 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 

# /~~37i Page 1 of 1 1.3 qUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 1.3.1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 

### AND CALIBRATION Mass emissions test equipment including Instrumentation shall be maintained In accordance with manufacturers Instructions and good engineering practice. Instrumentation formeasurement of pertinent physical parameters shall be currently calibrated with traceability to documented reference standards or procedures. Verification of such maintenance and calibration must be documented In each test record. All calibrations and control checks required by the approved test methods shall be performed and documented. 1.3.2 INTERLA8ORATORY CONTROL AUDITS Master test samples periodically provided by EPA~-DSSE are distributed 

### to one or more 

### agency, industry, or contract laboratory involved in Arizonamass emissions compliance testing. Tests results from these laboratories are submitted to EPA. When the correct values for the reference 

### samples are received they are checked against reported values. If there is not reasonable agreement the cause is ascertained by conference and a quality control check Is made of procedure and standards of the coopera ting source test laboratory.

### Sectidn 1.4 Revision 0 Date Jun 

### 23, 1978 Page 1 of I 1~ DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION 1.4.1 AGENCY OBSERVER ACTIVITIES Qualified Bureau observers 

### are assigned as the representatives of the Director to witness ~ll compliance testing by regulated sources as noted in Exhibit 1.4.1-1. WItnessing of laboratory analysis is also performed on a sampling basis. A sumary of the field observations by 

### the Bureau observer is documented on the Compliance Test-Check List, Exhibit 1.4.1-2. for each test 

### run. In addition, visible emissions are recorded by the observer for each emission point for comparison with the appropriate emission standard. 1.4.2 COMPLIANCE TEST REVIEW 

### Upon the submittal of the final report of the mass emission test data and analysis to the Bureau, the results are checked to assure compliance with isokinetjc sampling rates, accuracy of analysis 

### formass emission rates, and compliance with the applicable emission limit. The 

### review of compliancetest reports is documented on 

### Form DHS/AQC-006, Exhibit 1.4.2-1. 

## 1.4.3 TEST DOCUMENTATION A complete 

### copy of all test records shall be retained by the 

### Bureau for a minimum period of three (3) years. This record shall include all applicable documents noted in this manual.



# (JHEALTHSERVICES TItle

### 9
APPE’IDIX3 GUIDELINESFORMASSEMISSIONCOMPLIANCHTESTING 1. Where required bythe Directorin connectionwith an applicationforan installation or operating permit mass emission compliance testing shall be accompushed~naccordancewith hare~uide1lme.: 2. AnItemofequipment.noscoveredbyanoperatingpermitbutforwhichan installation permithatbeen issuedmaybeoperated,forpurposesofstart-upand testing only ifspecific written pemtirdon~hasbeenobtained from the Director dedgnathigthedatesofsuchoperationfortesting. 3. The Department shall be notified of the datesoFstart-up andenti~saon testingassoonastheyareset,butInnoeventlessthantwoweekspriortotesting orstart-up. 4~ Itistheapplicant’sresponsibilitytohavequalifiedemployeesortoobtaina qualified an~neering than to perform the testing. The Department’s Source EvaluationSection’sapprovalofthrtestmethodsandthesamplingpointsmustbe àbtalnedpriortocommencingtesting. Detailsoftheproposedtestproceduresand samplingpointsshould besubnutted in writing atleastoneweekin advance of testing or start-up. The Directorwill Issuewritten permission foroperation for start-upandtestingatthistime. S. The Department’s Source Evainatlón.Section willsendarepresentativ~ to.

~ witness emmiion testing. The representative may.approve inwritingchanges.in

pioccdurOandsamplingpointsasarethdlcatedbyfieldconditions. 6. All equipmentcovered bythepermitapplicationshallbeoperateddursng thetestinsucha mannerandtheprocess.feedshallbeofsuchcompositionand amountsastoproducethemaxrmumexpectedloadingofcontrolequipment. 7. Equipmentoperatingconditionsshallbem&utdred~dsub’niittedaspart ofthetestreportIncludingprocessfeedcomposition. 8. Acopy of“rawdata” from the emission’testsshall besubmitted tothe •t’sfield~~.~~ntativeatthetoneoftesting.Thefinalreportofthemass emissiontestdataandreportshallbesubmittedtotheDepartmnltwithinten(10) daysfollowingcoinpletionoftests. 9. Nolessthantwotestsshallbemadeatagivensamplingsiteunderthesame equipmentoperatingconditionsofrawmaterialfeedrateandrawmaterialquality. Agieernent in the calculatedmassemissionrateofanytwotestsshallnotexceed ten(10)percent,. Added9-14.



### Exhibit 1.4.1—i 2/28f~ Strop. 77.1 

### Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 1 of 1Company Name

___________ Address

_________________ Location of Source Tests ARIZONA OEPARTNE~4T OF HE.%LTH SERVICES ComoHanca Test

—Check List

Company Representative

____________ Supervisor of Test Team

__________ Purpose ofTest

_________________ Size and Type of Control Eqdioment
I. Best Available Sampling Station?

— 2. Traverse Points Required?

___________ 3. Dry Gas Meter Calibrated (date)

— 4. Magnehelic Gauges Calibrated (date) 5. Pitobe Calibration Fector?

__________ 6. AN Orifice Factor?

________________ 7. Nozzle Round and Sharp?

_____________ 8. Sampling Train•i~ Clean?

__________ 9. Sampling Train Correctly Asseetled? 10. 11. I2. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Meter Box Level?

_______________________ Manometers Zeroed?

___________________ tapingers in Crushed Ice?

____________ Thermemeters Checked Anbient?

_______ Filter Clearly Identified?

__________ Probe Hot Entire Length?

____________ Ff1tar Compartment Not?

_____________ Barometric Pressure? _______________in. Estimated Stack Temperature?

_________ Leak Check Rate at Start?

______________ Nozzle lip Touch Port Wall?

__________ Seeding Port Seal Around Probe? Probe Seal Ooesnt Disturb ~as Flow? Probe Mozzla Sealed in Stackwith Pump Off?

_________________________ Probe Disconnected While in Stack? IfAbove is Yes, was Tip Sealed Prior? Data Records Permanent?

____________ Data Recorded Accurately?

___________ Leak Check at Run Completion_CFT~ Orsat Checked Against Air?

__________ Integrated Bag Leak Checked?

_________ Orsat Leak Checked?

_________________ Open Joints Seale4 Before Moving Seeoling Equipment?

_________________ Sample Clean up Area?

_______________ Probe Clean Outside?

_________________ Probe Brushed?

_________________________ Probe Washed Acetone?

_________________ Filter Handled Expertly?

_____________ NoParticulate ‘Iisibly Lost In Clean up? Probe Lining Clean?

__________________ Nozzle Clean?

________________________ Silica Gel all Pink?

________________ Containers Labeled?



### Exhibit 1.4.1—2

Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 1 of 2 23. 24. 25.

• 26. 27. 23. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42.Compliance Test check List (Contd.)
Conmients on San~flng Procedure and Clean up: 

# (ç)

________

Was Test Supervisor Showii the Form Before Test? 

## £7Yes 

## £7No Was.He Given

## Opportunity to Read everAfterTest? 

## i.7Yes 

## £7No Did He? 

## Z7Yes

## Q No

Observers Name

_________________________ Title

_______________________________ Affiliation

____________________________ Signature

____________________________

5/24/78



### Exhibit 1.4.1—2 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 2 of 2REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE 

### TEST REPORT


### Name of Company

________________ Source Tested

_________________ Person Submitting Test Report Date(s) of 

### Test(s)

____________ Process Rate

___________________ Plant Emission Rates

__________ Maximum Allowable Emission Rate Review of Test Method

________ Review af Test Calculations

— County

______________

Report Demonstrates Compliance with Applicable Emission Standards ~egulation

Reviewer Date

Coninents (precision and accuracy of replicate tests, percent isokinetic sampling, operating anomalies):



# (~ T Engineering Services Section 

# /7 Planning and Special Projects 

### Exhibit 1.4.2-1 Revision 0 Date Jun 23, 1978 Page 1 of 1 DH~/AQC-0O6 (lO/77R)