alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20658

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNIE FOWLER III,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CR-217-1)

July 15, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnnie Fowler III appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to
 

1

21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A).

 

2United States v. Castillo, 77 F.3d 1480 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 180 (1996).

 

3United States v. Packer, 70 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 75 (1996).

 

4United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

2

distribute more than 100 grams of phencyclidine (PCP).1 Our review of the record and

the relevant authorities persuades that no reversible error was committed. Fowler

complains of the evidence of the quantity of drugs. The quantity of drugs is not an

element of the offense.2 The record reflects that Fowler possessed 28.78 actual grams

of PCP. Under Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(c)(7), the Drug Quantity Table, that

amount of drugs corresponds to a base offense level of 26, the base offense level used

by the district court in the sentencing computation. 

Fowler complains ofthe use of a prior conviction. The government complied with

21 U.S.C. § 851 by filing an information before trial identifying the prior convictions

upon which it wasrelying. Fowler made no challenge thereto. The district court did not

err in enhancing Fowler’s sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B).

The record is not sufficiently developed for us to address, on this direct appeal,

Fowler’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims.3 That must remain for another day.

Finally, Fowler’s complaint concerning the admission of extraneous evidence

about an earlier search of his home, involving his father, does not rise to the level of

adversely affecting his substantial rights.4 We perceive no basis for reversible error.
3

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.340 Physician and other licensed medical practitioner services. The State home must provide its residents the primary care necessary to enable them to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. When a resident needs care other than the State home is required to provide under this subpart, the State home is responsible to assist the resident to obtain that care. The State home must ensure that a physician personally approves in writing a recommendation that an individual be admitted to a domiciliary. Each resident must remain at all times under the care of a licensed medical practitioner assigned by the State home. The name of the practitioner will be listed in the resident's medical record. The State home must ensure that all of the following conditions in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section are met: ( a ) *Supervision of medical practitioners.* Any licensed medical practitioner who is not a physician may provide medical care to a resident within the practitioner's scope of practice without physician supervision when permitted by State law.
( b ) *Availability of medical practitioners.* If the resident's assigned licensed medical practitioner is unavailable, another licensed medical practitioner must be available to provide care for that resident.
( c ) *Visits.* The primary care physician or other licensed medical practitioner, for each visit required by paragraph (d) of this section, must ( 1 ) Review the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments;
( 2 ) Write, sign, and date progress notes; and
( 3 ) Sign and date all orders.
( d ) *Frequency of visits.* The primary care physician or other licensed medical practitioner must conduct an in-person medical assessment of the resident at least once a calendar year, or more frequently based on the resident's condition.
( e ) *Availability of emergency care.* The State home must assist residents in obtaining emergency care.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctioning Evasion Network Supporting Russia’s Military-Industrial Complex

# 									Sanctioning Evasion Network Supporting Russia’s Military-Industrial Complex							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 1, 2023

The United States, in coordination with our allies and partners, will continue to fully enforce our sanctions against Russia’s war machine and those that support its efforts.  These actions will decrease Russia’s ability to wage war and weaken its military-industrial complex.

Today, the Department of the Treasury is designating 22 persons, across multiple jurisdictions, who are connected to a sanctions evasion network supporting Russia’s defense sector, including prominent gray arms dealer Igor Vladimirovich Zimenkov.  Today’s actions, taken pursuant to Executive Order 14024, are another example of our determination to crack down on sanctions evasion efforts.

It has become increasingly difficult for Russia’s military-industrial complex to re-supply the Kremlin’s war machine, forcing it to rely on nefarious suppliers, such as Iran and the DPRK.  By trying to use proxies to circumvent U.S. sanctions, Russia demonstrates that our sanctions are having impact.  Our work will continue.

Today’s action was also taken as part of the U.S. commitment to the Russian Elites, Proxies, and Oligarchs (REPO) Task Force, a multilateral effort to identify and seize assets of Russian proxies around the world.  The REPO Task Force aims to maximize the effect of multilateral sanctions, ensuring that Russia is unable to easily evade the consequences wrought by its destructive and needless war against Ukraine.

For more information on today’s actions, see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDefenseOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
##### 



CONTRACT FOR THE SALE  OF CoCu Concentrate
 N° CTA/507/KCO
 Between :
 CENTRAL TRADING OF AFRICA Ltd,
 CTA
 And
 OMG KOKKOLA CHEMICALS Oy,
 KCO
 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 Table of contents:
 :
 ARTICLE 1 : DEFINITIONS
  CIF
 1




---



##### 



Business Day  Business Day, Business Day
 LMB
 LME
 Dispatched Lot and Dispatched Sub-Lot: CoCu Concentrate, KCO CTA
 Shipping CoCu Concentrate Received Lots.
 Received Lot : Received Lot
 Month Month.
 Quotational period:
 CoCu Concentrate:
 Ton metric Ton
 WMT
 DMT
 USD
 ARTICLE 2 : PURPOSE  DURATION and RECONDUCTION
 CoCu Concentrate
 CoCu Concentrate CIF
 st
  ARTICLE 3: CHARACTERISTICS& SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PRODUCTS TO BE DELIVERED
 CoCu
Concentrate
  CoCu Concentrate
 ARTICLE 4: PRICE
 2




---



##### 



4.1. Reference and Quotation Period
 4.1.1 For the Cobalt contained:
  4.1.2. For the Copper contained:
  4.2. Price calculation
 4.2.1 For the Cobalt contained:
  **
 4.2.2 For the Copper contained
 :
 **
 4.3. Penalty  Premium for the Cobalt
 4.3.1 Penalty if the Cobalt contained is **
 Received Lot
   4.3.2 Premium if the Cobalt contained is **
 Received Lot
   4.4. Invoicing / Payments
 4.4.1. Provisional invoice / payment
   -
 -
 -
 3




---



##### 



4.4.2. Final Invoice
  ARTICLE 5 : SAMPLING AND FINAL ANALYSIS
 Received Lot
 5.1. Weighing  Sampling
  Received Lot
        5.2. Analysis
    
  
 4




---



##### 



Received Lot, Shipping.
  ARTICLE 6: APPOINTMENT
    ARTICLE 7: NOTICES
  For CTA
CTA Ltd
 For KCO
 KCO
 5




---



##### 



ARTICLE 8: DEFAULT PROCEDURE
     ARTICLE 9: FORCE MAJEURE
     ARTICLE 10: REFERENCE DOCUMENT
  ARTICLE 11: AMENDMENT
   ARTICLE 12: NO WAIVER
 6




---



##### 



ARTICLE 13: VALIDITY OF THE CLAUSES AND HEADINGS
   ARTICLE 14: INTERPRETATION
  ARTICLE 15: AMICABLE SETTLEMENT
    ARTICLE 16: COMPETENT COURTS  LANGUAGE
    th
 /s/
    
    /s/ Jöran SopoCTA
    
    KCO
 7




---



##### 



Appendix 1  to the contract CTA/507/KCO
 **
 ** Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain information contained within
this document. Confidential portions are omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
 8
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

#### § 51.1 Purpose and scope of this part.

The purpose of this part is to establish VA's policies, procedures, and standards applicable to the payment of per diem to State homes that provide nursing home care, domiciliary care, or adult day health care to eligible veterans. Subpart B of this part sets forth the procedures for recognition and certification of a State home. Subpart C sets forth requirements governing the rates of, and procedures applicable to, the payment of per diem; the provision of drugs and medicines; and for which veterans VA will pay per diem. Subparts D, E, and F set forth standards that any State home seeking per diem payments for nursing home care (subpart D), domiciliary care (subpart E), or adult day health care (subpart F) must meet.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KAELYN J. DRUMMOND

, 1

Respondent Below

Appellant,

v.

MITCHELL R. DRUMMOND,

P etitioner Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 267, 2017

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. CN10

- 05898

§ Petition No. 15

- 39427

§

Submitted: March 5 , 201 8

Decided: March 15 , 2018

O R D E R

This 15 th day of March 2018

, it appears that the Court issued by certified mail

a notice to the appellant to show cause why h er appeal should not be dismissed for

her failure to file her opening brief . The appellant failed to accept service of the

notice, which was resent to her by first class mail at the address she provided. The

appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten

day period

. Thus, d ismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7224** 

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 00322

- GCM )

Submitted : October 1 , 2010 Decided: October 2 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Tompkins v. Mitchell , No. 1:08

- cv - 00322

- GCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009)

. Tompkins’ motions for default judgment, for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005090EN.01001001.xml

| 14.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/10

---

48th amendment of the State aid guidelines

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

(2005/C 90/05)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: n.a.

Case No: 47811

Title: Amendment to Chapter 16 on ‘State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring firms in difficulty’ of the State aid guidelines by replacing Chapter 16 with a new text and a proposal for appropriate measures.

Legal basis: College Decision No 305/04/COL

Decision: The appropriate measures, proposed by the Authority and accepted by the EFTA States are as follows:

to amend their existing aid schemes relating to State aid covered by the amended Chapter 16 of the Authority's State aid guidelines so to comply with the Guidelines by 1 June 2005 at the latest.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 33-71788 and No. 33-80306) of Titan International, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2011, except for the effects of the restatement described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and the matter described in the penultimate paragraph of Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Restated) as to which the date is November 9, 2011, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in this Form 10-K/A.
 
 
 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 St. Louis, MO
 November 9, 2011
#### § 141.14 Home.

The term *home* means real estate comprising a single-family dwelling(s) or a dwelling unit(s) for four or fewer families in the aggregate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000793730
<NAME>                        NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          5,712,130
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   8,829
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          24,668,806
<DEPRECIATION>                  (6,068,558)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  24,730,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         20,157,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      (9,866,141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    24,730,243
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,674,608
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,927,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                376,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,550,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,180,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,180,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2757

To direct the President to assess the advisability of requiring each State 

to use the Death Master File of the Social Security Administration 

in issuing drivers’ licenses to individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2003

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To direct the President to assess the advisability of requiring 

each State to use the Death Master File of the Social 

Security Administration in issuing drivers’ licenses to 

individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Identity Protec5 tion Act’’. 
2

•HR 2757 IH 

1 SEC. 2. USE OF MASTER DEATH FILE IN ISSUANCE OF DRIV2 ERS’ LICENSES. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The President shall conduct a study to 

4 assess the advisability of requiring each State to use the 

5 Death Master File of the Social Security Administration 

6 in issuing drivers’ licenses to individuals as a method of 

7 determining the validity of the social security numbers 

8 supplied by the individuals. 

9 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

10 of enactment of this Act, the President shall transmit to 

11 Congress a report on the results of the study. 

12 (c) DELEGATION.—The President shall conduct the 

13 study acting through the head of an appropriate Federal 

14 department or agency, as designated by the President.

Æ
§ 1807.400 Affordable Housing—General. ( a ) For any amount of the CMF Award used for Affordable Housing Activities, 100 percent of such Eligible Project Costs must be attributable to Affordable Housing, meaning that the Affordable Housing complies with the affordability qualifications set forth in this subpart for Eligible-Income Families. Further, as a subset of said 100 percent, greater than 50 percent of the Eligible Project Costs must be attributable to Affordable Housing that comply with the affordability qualifications set forth in this subpart for Low-Income, Very Low-Income, or Extremely Low-Income Families, or as further set forth in the applicable NOFA and/or Assistance Agreement.
( b ) Affordable Housing must be Permanent Housing.
( c ) All the occupants of the Affordable Housing must not be full-time students unless they are: ( 1 ) Married students who file a joint tax return;
( 2 ) Students who receive assistance under Title IV of the Social Security Act;
( 3 ) Students enrolled in a job training program;
( 4 ) Students who are single parents with children who are their dependents, as defined in IRC sec. 152;
( 5 ) Students who previously were part of a foster care program; or
( 6 ) Meet other criteria specified by the CDFI Fund.
#### § 12.8 Waivers.

A national bank may file a written request with the OCC for waiver of one or more of the requirements set forth in §§ 12.2 through 12.7, either in whole or in part. The OCC may grant a waiver from the requirements of this part to any national bank, or any class of national banks, with regard to a specific transaction or a specific class of transactions.
§ 22.7 Force placement of flood insurance. ( a ) *Notice and purchase of coverage.* If a national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on behalf of the bank or savings association, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under § 22.3, then the national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall notify the borrower that the borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower's expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount required under § 22.3, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood insurance within 45 days after notification, then the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, shall purchase insurance on the borrower's behalf. The national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount.
( b ) *Termination of force-placed insurance* — ( 1 ) *Termination and refund.* Within 30 days of receipt by a national bank or Federal savings association, or by a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage, the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, shall: ( i ) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( ii ) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or by its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section during any period during which the borrower's flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, were each in effect, and any related fees charged to the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, during such period.
( 2 ) *Sufficiency of demonstration.* For purposes of confirming a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, a national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company or agent.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00430-CV

HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant 

V.

SAUL RODRIGUEZ, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 127th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-40476 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 7, 2018. The clerk’s record 

was filed July 10, 2018. The reporter’s record was filed July 2, 2018. No brief was 

filed.

On November 6, 2018, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

filed a brief on or before November 21, 2018, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered 

dismissed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell.