alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011278EN.01000801.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/8

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2011/C 278/09

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 29 March 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case Number | : | 68962 |
| Decision Number | : | 96/11/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Notodden airport, Tuven |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) and the Chapter on the financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports in part IV of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid |
| Objective | : | Airport infrastructure |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | NOK 9 485 000 |
| Economic sectors | : | Airport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Transport and Communication |
| PO Box 8010 Dep. |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

29 March 2011

Case Number

:

68962

Decision Number

:

96/11/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Notodden airport, Tuven

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) and the Chapter on the financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports in part IV of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines

Type of measure

:

Individual aid

Objective

:

Airport infrastructure

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

:

NOK 9 485 000

Economic sectors

:

Airport

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Transport and Communication

PO Box 8010 Dep.

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-52655)  of  ATA  Holdings  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries   (Debtor  and
Debtors-In-Possession as of October 26, 2004) and in the related Prospectus,  in
the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  33-65708)  pertaining  to the 1993
Incentive  Stock Plan for Key Employees of ATA Holdings Corp.  and  Subsidiaries
(Debtor  and   Debtors-In-Possession   as  of  October  26,  2004)  and  in  the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-3 No.  333-86791)  of ATA  Holdings  Corp.  and
Subsidiaries  (Debtor and  Debtors-In-Possession  as of October 26, 2004) and in
the latest  Prospectus  of our report dated  February  11, 2005,  except for the
seventh  paragraph in Note 1 and last paragraph in Note 19, as to which the date
is March 25, 2005,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and
financial statement schedule of ATA Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries  (Debtor and
Debtors-In-Possession  as of October 26,  2004),  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 25, 2005
# L_2009067EN.01009301.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/93

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES

No 5/2008/SC

of 4 December 2008

amending the Decisions of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC and No 1/2007/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to Protocol 38a on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area, and amended by the Agreement on the participation of Bulgaria and Romania in the European Economic Area,

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 5/2004/SC of 23 September 2004 establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism,

Having regard to the fact that Liechtenstein now is in the position to produce its own official data on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), however with a delay of normally two years,

Having regard to the Recommendations of the Heads of National Statistical Institutes of 24 April 2008,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of Article 1 of the Decision of the Standing Committee No 1/2007/SC amending the Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism, shall be replaced by the following:

‘Paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Annex to the Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism shall be replaced by the following:

| “6. | The GDP data on which the contributions for a specific year t are to be based, shall be delivered by 1 February of the same year and shall relate to the year t-2. When GDP data for the year t-2 is not available, for Liechtenstein a proxy based on the latest GDP data available (t-4) adjusted by the growth rate of the Swiss GDP for t-3 and t-2 shall be used. This method is subject to a review within three years.” ’ |
| --- | --- |

“6.

Article 2

This Decision shall take immediate effect and apply to the fifth/last tranche (2008/2009).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2008.

For the Standing Committee

The Chairman

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

The Secretary-General

Kåre BRYN

---
# C_2023129EN.01000201.xml

| 13.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2023

(2023/C 129/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0922 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4506 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88038 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3480 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9853 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,4745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,421 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 376,23 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6631 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9385 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,0976 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6377 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4728 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5737 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7649 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4538 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 448,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1330 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5183 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 253,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8193 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,291 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,391 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4635 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7972 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,6875 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0922

JPY

Japanese yen

146,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4506

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88038

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3480

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9853

ISK

Iceland króna

149,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,4745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,421

HUF

Hungarian forint

376,23

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6631

RON

Romanian leu

4,9385

TRY

Turkish lira

21,0976

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6377

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4728

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5737

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7649

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4538

KRW

South Korean won

1 448,10

ZAR

South African rand

20,1330

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5183

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 253,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8193

PHP

Philippine peso

60,291

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,391

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4635

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7972

INR

Indian rupee

89,6875

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### Philip Pommerantz, Respondent, *v.*Philip Bloom, Appellant.

Appeal from order of Special Term, directing payment to sheriff by third party in proceedings supplementary to execution, etc.

A. H. Sarasohn, for appellant.

S. Cohen, for respondent.

Hascall, J.

It is quite clear that the intent and reading of section 2441 of the Code is to vest great discretion in the justice at Special Term in making the order thereunder. The distinction sought to be drawn by appellant, between *“*ordering ” and “ per*755mitting,” as a ground for reversal, while, possibly, logical, is not, necessarily, practical; and, therefore, we do not think, in view of the old, familiar adage, that this alone would be sufficient to disturb the order below. The principal question is whether it was a preliminary necessity that appellant should have reasonable notice of application for the order appealed from, whether any notice at all was required. The extreme latitude bestowed by the Legislature, in these words, *“*may, in his discretion, and upon such a notice, given to such persons as he deems just, or, *without notice,*make an order,” etc., leaves the matter almost completely within control of the justice making the order, and, unless there has been an abuse of power, a serious overstepping of judicial discretion, the General Term will not interfere.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Schuchman, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.
428 A.2d 231

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Alan James RAVERT, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted March 21, 1980.

Filed April 3, 1981.

*47Charles P. Gelso, Wilkes-Barre, for appellant.

Chester B. Muroski, District Attorney, Wilkes-Barre, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, BROSKY and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was charged with possession and delivery of a controlled substance—marijuana. A preliminary hearing was held at which Ravert asserts the Commonwealth failed to establish by evidence the essential elements of the crime. Additionally, Ravert claims the Commonwealth failed to show the appellant was not a person who was registered under the Controlled Substance Act1 or licensed by the appropriate state board.

Ravert moved to quash the indictment at the end of the presentation of the Commonwealth’s case. The trial court reviewed and denied the appellant’s application to quash the proceedings. From this determination, the appellant has appealed.

*48The matter before this court is the appealability of the trial court’s decision to deny the appellant’s motion. Generally, a defendant may not appeal until sentence has been imposed. *Commonwealth v. Myers,*457 Pa. 317, 322 A.2d 131 (1974). An appeal will be allowed where the grounds upon which it is founded include a claim that the defendant is being placed in double jeopardy. *Commonwealth v. Bolden,*472 Pa. 602, 373 A.2d 90 (1977). This court has also held that an appeal may be taken where “exceptional circumstances” are presented. *Commonwealth v. Warfield,*424 Pa. 555, 227 A.2d 177 (1967).

In the instant case, none of the circumstances where an appeal may be taken which would otherwise be interlocutory exist. Thus, in view of our decision that this appeal is interlocutory, we express no view as to the correctness of the opinion of the trial court.

Appeal quashed and this, matter is remanded for trial without prejudice to the parties.

1

. 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30).
# C_2011156EN.01000901.xml

| 26.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/9

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 156/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 15 December 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68553 |
| Decision number | : | 490/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Name of the beneficiary | : | Nord Trøndelag Elektrisitetsverk Energi AS |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection |
| Scheme | : | The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 125/06/COL of 3 May 2006 |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Aid amount | : | NOK 228 million |
| Economic sectors | : | Electricity production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Borchsgt. 2 |
| 7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

15 December 2010

Case number

:

68553

Decision number

:

490/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Name of the beneficiary

:

Nord Trøndelag Elektrisitetsverk Energi AS

Type of measure

:

Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection

Scheme

:

The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 125/06/COL of 3 May 2006

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

:

Grant

Aid amount

:

NOK 228 million

Economic sectors

:

Electricity production

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Borchsgt. 2

7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### § 48.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 48.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 48.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) The performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) The performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) You believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the Department of Veterans Affairs awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |
§ 1073.206 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs. ( a ) Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717, the Director shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on debts owed to the United States. Interest, penalties, and administrative costs will be assessed in accordance with 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) The Director shall waive collection of interest on a debt or any portion of the debt which is paid in full within 30 days after the date on which the interest began to accrue.
( c ) The Director may waive interest accrued during a period a disputed debt is under investigation or review by the Bureau, *i.e.,* from the date the Bureau receives a request for review until the date the Bureau issues a final agency decision. The Director may only grant this waiver for good cause shown by the debtor. This waiver must be requested by the debtor before the expiration of the 30-day waiver period described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The Director may at any time waive collection of interest, penalties, or administrative costs if he or she finds that one or more of the following conditions exists: ( 1 ) The Debtor is unable to pay any significant sum toward the debt within a reasonable period of time;
( 2 ) Collection of interest, penalties, or administrative costs will jeopardize collection of the principal of the debt;
( 3 ) The Bureau is unable to enforce collection in full within a reasonable period of time through collection proceedings; or
( 4 ) Collection is against equity and good conscience or is not in the best interest of the United States.
( e ) The Director is authorized to assess interest, penalties, administrative costs, or other related charges on debts that are not subject to 31 U.S.C. 3717 to the extent authorized under the common law or other applicable statutory authority.
# C_2005325EN.01002401.xml

| 22.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/24

---

List of natural mineral waters in Iceland and Norway pursuant to Article 1 of Council Directive 80/777/EEC of 15 July 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters

(2005/C 325/12)

LIST OF NATURAL MINERAL WATERS RECOGNISED BY ICELAND:

| Trade name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Icelandic Spring | Jadar spring area | Reykjavik |

Trade name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Icelandic Spring

Jadar spring area

Reykjavik

LIST OF NATURAL MINERAL WATERS RECOGNISED BY NORWAY:

| Trade name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Farris | Kong Olavs kilde | Larvik |
| Fjellbekk | Ivar Aasen kilde | Volda |
| Fyresdal | Fyresdalkilden | Fyresdal |
| Olden | Blåfjellkilden | Olderdalen |
| Osa | Osakilden | Ilvik/Hardanger |

Trade name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Farris

Kong Olavs kilde

Larvik

Fjellbekk

Ivar Aasen kilde

Volda

Fyresdal

Fyresdalkilden

Fyresdal

Olden

Blåfjellkilden

Olderdalen

Osa

Osakilden

Ilvik/Hardanger

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                            12,753
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     13,205
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                      990,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,416,176
<PP&E>                           574,674
<DEPRECIATION>                   232,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,911,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            214,185
<BONDS>                        8,590,284
<COMMON>                         394,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            445,064
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                     7,518,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,911,407
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,916
<CGS>                            126,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,089,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               517,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,729,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,729,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,729,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.06)


</TABLE>
# C_2023121EN.01000101.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 121/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 112, 27.3.2023

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 104, 20.3.2023

OJ C 94, 13.3.2023

OJ C 83, 6.3.2023

OJ C 71, 27.2.2023

OJ C 63, 20.2.2023

OJ C 54, 13.2.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### Marcus Braun, Respondent, *v.*Seward Webb, as President of The Wagner Palace Car Co., Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

July, 1900.)

Negligence — Verdict of §750 to a sleeping-car passenger compelled to sit up all night in a day coach.

A verdict of §750 is not excessive in the case of a sleeping car passenger who, after he had paid for his berth and had had it assigned to him, was subsequently excluded therefrom and compelled to sit up during a cold night in a day coach, because the company by mistake had sold the same berth to another person who occupied it.

Reargument of an appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered upon a verdict for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the minutes.

Action by a passenger to recover damages for being excluded from a sleeping car of the defendant. The plaintiff, a newspaperman, on the morning of July 10, 1899, at Cleveland, O., secured and paid for a lower berth on the evening train for blew York. On reaching the train the berth was assigned to him but, as appeared a few minutes later, had been also sold to other persons, and they occupied it. The plaintiff sat up all night in a day car. The night was cold. The jury rendered a verdict for $750.

Saunders, Webb *&*Worcester (Thorndike Saunders, of counsel), for appellant.

Morris Cukor, for respondent.

Hascall, J.

Reading the case from the appellant’s standpoint, the position most favorable to him, and even conceding that his reiteration of the facts is beyond criticism, the question still is, was the jury justified, by the evidence, in its verdict?

Payment to the car company of the charges demanded by it for occupancy of the sleeping berth, hours before the departure of the train; receiving the respondent as a guest at the time of starting; *244assigning him his cot and section for the night, and making his bed, were certainly acts of common and every-day occurrence. But *then*to have a conductor tell him, without prior or timely warning: “ Well, you cannot have that berth * * * because it is occupied by some one else,” to be compelled to sit up all night in an ordinary day coach, or secure such rest as he might therein, to be told upon his application for redress “ you ,can have back only your money ” furnish, altogether, cold comfort for a passenger treated, as the record shows, in such manner as was this respondent. If the jury had been over liberal, in appellant’s estimation,- in naming a just compensation to respondent, we still think, the judgment under all the evidence, just, and that it ought to be maintained.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Schuchman, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.