alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010067EN.01001101.xml

| 18.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/11

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 67/06

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 18 November 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 63204 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged State aid being granted to Westfal-Larsen Gruppen/Scandinavian Electric AS |
| Type of measure | : | No aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | The municipality of Bergen |
| Postboks 7700 |
| 5020 Bergen |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

18 November 2009

Case number

:

63204

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged State aid being granted to Westfal-Larsen Gruppen/Scandinavian Electric AS

Type of measure

:

No aid

Name and address of the granting authority

:

The municipality of Bergen

Postboks 7700

5020 Bergen

NORWAY

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:28 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Murphy.Deirdre@epamail.epa.gov; Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov; 

Watkins.Nealson@epamail.epa.gov; Weinstock.Lewis@epamail.epa.gov; Orlin.David@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Final clean and redline files for the CO NAAQS

Heidi, 

Attached is a clean copy of our final file and a redline of this compared to the file sent to you in 

December.

 

There is one slight amendment concerning the number of monitors in the required monitoring network. 

The preamble had said that the near-road requirements are estimated to result in 75 monitors in 53 

CBSAs. While the 53 CBSAs are correct, the number of monitors is 77, not 75. The correct statement is 

that we will have approximately 77 monitors in 53 CBSAs. We have made the correction in the ICR and 

the impact of going from 75 to 77 monitors is negligible as far as cost. For the sake of clarity, I have 

modified the language that I sent you yesterday on the ICR numbers so that it is now correct. Please let 

me know if you have any questions. Thanks Heidi. Here is the revised language on the ICR:

The ICR requires creating an estimate for operation of the entire network. This estimate as an 

annual average reporting burden for the collection under 40 CFR part 58 (averaged over the first 

3 years of this ICR) for a network of 311 CO monitors is $7,235,483. The portion of this cost 

specifically attributable to installing/relocating existing CO monitors at an estimated 77 new 

near-road NO2 sites, is estimated to be $8961 per year. For purposes of calculating the annual 

cost of the network, the relocation cost for these 77 monitors was amortized over 7 years. Thus 

the total cost for installing/relocating these monitors is $62,727.
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of FCCC, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:   February 6, 2009 | 
|------------------------- | 
|                          | 

| | Bernard Zimmerman                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | President, Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Boundless Motor
Sports Racing, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Thomas L. Earnshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/Thomas L. EarnshawThomas L. EarnshawChief Financial OfficerDate: May 24, 2004
SUPREME COURT, ONONDAGA SPECIAL TERM,

JULY, 1900.

#### Forest G. Weeks, Plaintiff, *v.*Thomas Ryan, Defendant.

Motion for a nonsuit, the decision thereof having been held pending the submission of certain questions to the jury in-accordance with the provisions of section 1187, Code.

W. S. Jenney, for motion.

Edwin Nottingham, opposed.

*700Hiscock, J.

Motion for nonsuit is denied upon the ground that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the jury that subsequent to the making of the contract in question the defend ant Ryan, with full knowledge of its substantial details, ratified the same.

Motion denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

R.L.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 167 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Madeco S.A.

| | 
| | 

|Name                             | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Soinmad S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Optel Ltda.                      | Brazil                       
|Madeco Brasil Ltda.              | Brazil                       
|Metalurgica e Industrial S.A.    | Argentina                    
|Metacab S.A.                     | Argentina                    
|H.B. San Luis S.A.               | Argentina                    
|Comercial Madeco S.A.            | Argentina                    
|Madeco Overseas S.A.             | Cayman Islands               
|Metal Overseas S.A.              | Cayman Islands               
|Nexans S.A.                      | France                       
|Madeco S.A. Agencia Islas Caiman | Cayman Islands               
|Armat S.A.                       | Chile                        
|Decker S.A.                      | Argentina                    
|Madeco Brass Mills S.A.          | Chile                        
|Alusa S.A.                       | Chile                        
|Alufoil S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Inversiones Alusa S.A.           | Chile                        
|Peruplast S.A.                   | Peru                         
|Aluflex S.A.                     | Argentina                    
|Alusa Overseas                   | Cayman Islands               
|Indalum S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Alumco S.A.                      | Chile                        
|Inversiones Alumco S.A.          | Chile                        
|Ingewall S.A.                    | Chile                        
|PVTEC S.A.                       | Chile
#### Morris Jacobson, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered upon a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for,a new trial.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondent.

Conlan, J.

The action is to recover for an injury alleged to have occurred to the plaintiff’s horse and wagon by reason of the negligence of -the defendant.

It is conceded that the damages are not excessive if the recovery can be sustained. We are asked by the' defendant to reverse this judgment on the usual grounds of contributory negligence of the plaintiff’s servants, and of the freedom from negligence of the defendant, but the record fails to convince us that either of these elements appear, and the submission of the whole ease to the jury was given under a charge which was eminently fair to both sides. Indeed, the jury were so positively instructed by the co-urt upon the question of interest of two of the witnesses called by the plaintiff, and who had each an action pending against the defendant for personal injuries growing out of this very accident, that preponderance of evidence in the plaintiff’s favor was the only reason for the result attained. There was no exception to the charge, and we are unable to find in the whole ease any element or circumstance which calls for an interference with the judgment and order appealed from.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Hascall, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
## t 

# CHE R O - 

# ~ ~j ~ ~j



## ~AK ENNETH D

. 

## • 

# BRICK& TILE COMPAAT

WATERVILLE ROAD P.O. BOX 4567 MACON, GEORGIA 31208 TELEPI•ftiNE 478-781-6800

FAX 478-781-8954
r"1pri117, 2013

Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy Cortney Higgins, U,S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: My narne is Kenneth Sams and I am CEO of Cherokee Brick & Tile Company in Macon, Georgia. My great grandfather purcbased the company in 1900 and I am the fourth continuous generation in my family to run the company. It is my hope that my daughter Kate, general counsel of Cherokee, will one day be the fifth generation to run the company. For the past six years our industry has been in the worst recession since the 1930's. I can remember stories from my grandfather about how they survived the great depression. It would be no exaggeration to suggest we have faced a business climate that rivals what my grandfather faced. We have done everything possible to comply or exceed the requirements o£ all the envitonmental la.ws and 1VIACT standards. Since 1985 we have continually used methane gas from a local landfill to supply 20°10 - 30% of our fuel needs. No clay or finished product from our manufacturing process is ever thrown away. Even the waste water from our sample shop (where brick are wet-sawed for samples) is recycled. Our pits from which clay is mined is converted back to wetlands and wildlife habitat In other words we have txied to be good stewards of the environment. We employ in normal times between 300 and 400 people. We are not what you would call a high tech industry. However what we do to manufacture brick takes a lot of skill and knowledge gleaned. from many years of woxking in the industry. We manufacture a product that lasts and does its job probably longer than any other product with no maintenance. Because we are a sxnall industry.very few of oux employees join the company with any brick makiing experience. We train them and alnmost all promotions come from within the company. We are a cosnpany that prides itself on helping our employees become more productive as they gain experience. Our cornpany is just a microcosm of the industry as a whole. What is our future and the future of our employees? The controls we have already put in place are working. We are extrernely concerned by what apPears to be the direction of the re-promulgation of

### the second MACT. At some point we will 

### not be 

### able to meet the requirements and our only choice



### will be to go out of business. I respectfiilly request that those who 

### are writing the requirements remember they are 

### not dealing with a very laarge industry, but many small companies much like us who a.te providi.ng a superior product and jobs for 

### its einployees. Thank you for yotur consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,

Kenneth D. Sams Chairman and CEO

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 274 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.274

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the property in 
  Cecil County, Maryland, known as Garrett Island for inclusion in the 
                  Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

     The Congress finds the following:
        (1) Garrett Island, located at the mouth of the Susquehanna 
    River in Cecil County, Maryland, is a microcosm of the geology and 
    geography of the region, including hard rock piedmont, coastal 
    plain, and volcanic formations.
        (2) Garrett Island is the only rocky island in the tidal waters 
    of the Chesapeake.
        (3) Garrett Island and adjacent waters provide high-quality 
    habitat for bird and fish species.
        (4) Garrett Island contains significant archaeological sites 
    reflecting human history and prehistory of the region.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR INCLUSION IN THE BLACKWATER 
              NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior may use otherwise 
available amounts to acquire the area known as Garrett Island, 
consisting of approximately 198 acres located at the mouth of the 
Susquehanna River in Cecil County, Maryland.
    (b) Administration.--Lands and interests acquired by the United 
States under this section shall be managed by the Secretary as the 
Garrett Island Unit of the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge.
    (c) Purposes.--The purposes for which the Garrett Island Unit is 
established and shall be managed are the following:
        (1) To support the Delmarva Conservation Corridor Demonstration 
    Program.
        (2) To conserve, restore, and manage habitats as necessary to 
    contribute to the migratory bird populations prevalent in the 
    Atlantic Flyway.
        (3) To conserve, restore, and manage the significant aquatic 
    resource values associated with submerged land adjacent to the unit 
    and to achieve the habitat objectives of the agreement known as the 
    Chesapeake 2000 Agreement.
        (4) To conserve the archaeological resources on the unit.
        (5) To provide public access to the unit in a manner that does 
    not adversely impact natural resources on and around the unit.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Order entered July 22, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00054
- CV KWIK INDUSTIRES, INC ., Appellant
V. TSFG, INC. , ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05
- 10901 

### O RDER Before the Court is the motion of Sheretta Martin, Official Court Reporter for the 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, requesting a sixty

- day extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the motion to the extent that the reporter’s record shall be filed within thirty days of the date of this order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c).

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34

                              AMENDMENT #1 TO THE
                         WESTERN MULTIPLEX CORPORATION
               2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Pursuant to the right reserved by the Board of Directors of Western Multiplex
Corporation under Section 25 of the Western Multiplex Corporation 2000 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Director Plan"):

     (i)   Section 27(a) of the Director Plan is hereby amended by deleting the
date "May 12, 2000" and replacing such date with "June 8, 2000".

     (ii)  Section 27(b) of the Director Plan is hereby amended by deleting the
date "May 10, 2010" and replacing such date with "June 8, 2010."



June 19, 2000
#### TOWAR COTTON MILLS v. UNITED STATES

[59 C. Cls. 841; 270 U. S. 375]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

1. Where there are no findings of the Court of Claims that claimant suffered any loss or damage under or by reason of the cancellation of his contract with the War Department, it is unnecessary to consider whether an award made by the Secretary of War and accepted by the claimant was binding on the latter.

2. Where claimant entered.into two contracts, one to supply goods to the Government and the other, later, by which the Government advanced money to carry out the first and took his note, upon which were to be credited deductions from payments falling due under the first, an award to the claimant on the first (after its cancellation), did not bar the Government’s counterclaim on the note, and the award was properly credited as of its date, rather than the date when the earlier contract was canceled.

Mr. Justice StoNe

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 1, 1926.
§ 1293.41 Required Enterprise data collection and reporting. Each Enterprise shall collect, maintain, and provide to FHFA the following data relating to single-family mortgages: ( a ) The language preference of applicants and borrowers; and
( b ) Whether applicants and borrowers have completed homeownership education or housing counseling and information about the homeownership education or housing counseling.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_______ _________________ No. 13

- 1 1962 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ District No. 1:12

- c v
- 00500

- TWT RICKY J. SAMPSON,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus KASIM REED, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Atlanta, et al.,
De fendant s, ROBERT C. GODWIN, individually, REGINALD PETTIS, individually,
Defendants

- Appellants.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nor thern District of Georgia

________________________ (October 2, 2013)

Before WILSON, HILL , and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-11962 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Robert Godwin and Reginald Pettis appeal the denial of their motions for summary judgment in this Section 1983 action against them by plaintiff, Ricky Sampson. The district court, in a well

- reasoned and thorough opinion, denied summary judgment as to the officers’ affirmative defenses of qualified immunity and official immunity. The district co urt also found that Sampson had presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to his claims of false imprisonment and abuse in being arrested. Finally, the district court held that there was sufficient evidence to support Sam pson’s battery claim against Officer Pettis, but not against Officer Godwin, whom the undisputed evidence showed did not touch Sampson. Sampson does not appeal the grant of summary judgment to
Officer Godwin on this claim.
We have reviewed the record in t his case and the district court’s thoughtful opinion. Finding no reversible error, we shall affirm.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for further proceedings. Case: 13-11962 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


National Advisory Council on Migrant Health; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Dates and Times: November 2, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; November 
3, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Hilton Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Telephone: (301) 468-1100, Fax: (301) 468-0308.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public.
    Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and 
issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and 
their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services.
    Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of the Council's general 
business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from 
experts on farmworker issues, including the status of farmworker 
health at the local and national levels.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gladys Cate, Office of Minority and 
Special Populations, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources 
and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 
20857; telephone (301) 594-0367.

    Dated: September 29, 2009.
Alexandra Huttinger,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. E9-24045 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P