alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2003 AQMP - 2020 STATIONARY BASELINE EMISSIONS WITH GROWH - SOX AND PM10 BY MAJOR SOURCE CATEGORY (T/D)

Road Dust

SOx PM10 SOx PM10 PM10 SOx PM10

010 Electric Utilities 0.34 1.17 0.34 1.17020 Cogeneration 0.01 0.68 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.69030 Oil and Gas Production (Combustion) 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.17040 Petroleum Refining (Combustion) 0.00 2.42 0.00 2.42050 Manufacturing and Industrial 0.17 2.14 0.37 1.06 0.54 3.21052 Food and Agricultural Processing 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.20060 Service and Commercial 0.59 0.97 0.23 0.29 0.82 1.26099 Other (Fuel Combustion) 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.33110 Sewage Treatment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00120 Landfills 0.15 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.21

130 Incinerators 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.13199 Other (Waste Disposal) 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15210 Laundering 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00220 Degreasing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00230 Coatings and Related Process Solvents 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07240 Printing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00250 Sealants & Adhesives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00299 Other (Cleaning and Surface Coatings) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00310 Oil and Gas Production 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03320 Petroleum Refining 4.50 0.79 4.50 0.79330 Petroleum Marketing 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07399 Other (Petroleum Production and Marketing) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00410 Chemical 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62420 Food and Agriculture 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25430 Mineral Processes 0.01 3.26 0.00 1.66 0.01 4.92

440 Metal Processes 0 07 1 91 0 00 0 00 0 07 1 91

Point Area Total Stationary

MSC SumName

440 Metal Processes 0.07 1.91 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.91450 Wood and Paper 0.00 0.09 0.00 1.13 0.00 1.22460 Glass and Related Products 0.31 0.33 0.31 0.33470 Electronics 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01499 Other (Industrial Processes) 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.23

NOX/SOX Reclaim 12.03 12.03

Total Emissions (T/D) 19 16 1 4 0 19.1 20.4

Annual Average inventory.

Rounds off may introduce slight discrepancies in totals.

G:\AIR-3\Permit Programs\NSR Info\District NSR Rulemaking\By Districts\South Coast\Rule 1315\TSD support D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gladys Cate, Office of Minority and Special Populations, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594-0367.

Dated: September 29, 2009.

Alexandra Huttinger,

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.

[FR Doc. E9-24045 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
# C_2021471EN.01000101.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 471/01)

Last publication

OJ C 462, 15.11.2021

Past publications

OJ C 452, 8.11.2021

OJ C 431, 25.10.2021

OJ C 422, 18.10.2021

OJ C 412, 11.10.2021

OJ C 401, 4.10.2021

OJ C 391, 27.9.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Treaty Room

Washington, D.C.

July 19, 2023

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Well, good morning everyone.  It’s a great pleasure to have the secretary-general here.  We have a strong partnership with the Arab League, and evidence of that is the fact that we’re inaugurating our strategic dialogue, which we’ve been very much looking forward to.  It’s an opportunity for us to work even more closely together on the many issues that are affecting the lives of people in all of the countries represented by the Arab League as well as the United States.

We, of course, have a lot to talk about, so many different challenges that we’re facing together, but I think the fact that we’re inaugurating this dialogue with the secretary-general really is evidence of the possibilities, the potential for strengthening and deepening our cooperation.  We deeply value collaboration with the Arab League, and I’m very much looking forward to this conversation today.  It’s especially good to have you back here at the State Department.  Welcome.

**SECRETARY-GENERAL GHEIT:**Thank you, thank you very much Secretary.  Well, as Secretary Blinken said, this is – might be the first time the United States and the League of Arab States are having that kind of very wide dialogue together on the level of the Secretary and the secretary-general of the league.  Our teams will spend the rest of the day working together trying to explore further the level of cooperation.  We are looking forward to deepen the relationship.  And the United States, a great power in the region as well as outside of that region – the region have been passing through most difficult times, and I’m sure that the steady hand of the United States – we will be receiving more and more help and support.  Thank you very much.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Thank you.  Thank you, Secretary-General.  Thanks, everyone.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateStrategic Dialogue

Back to Top
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Mazzoni, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of OPTi Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have: 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is prepared; 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any, fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

July 30, 2007
Supreme Court — Appellate Term,

June, 1900.

Before Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

#### Jacob Meyerowitz et al., Appellants, v. Royal D. Deyo et al., Respondents

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan. William Klingenstein, for appellants ; Pannes & Eberhardt, for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

No opinion.
§ 1501.2 What activities has the Secretary determined to be financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity? ( a ) *Activities permitted under section 5136A(b)(3) of the Revised Statutes ( 12 U.S.C. 24a(b)(3) ).* ( 1 ) The following types of activities are financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity when conducted pursuant to a determination by the Secretary under paragraph (a)(2) of this section: ( i ) Lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others, or safeguarding financial assets other than money or securities;
( ii ) Providing any device or other instrumentality for transferring money or other financial assets; and
( iii ) Arranging, effecting, or facilitating financial transactions for the account of third parties.
( 2 ) *Review of specific activities—* ( i ) *Is a specific request required?* A financial subsidiary that wishes to engage on the basis of paragraph (a)(1) of this section in an activity that is not otherwise permissible for a financial subsidiary must obtain a determination from the Secretary that the activity is permitted under paragraph (a)(1).
( ii ) *Consultation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.* After receiving a request under this section, the Secretary will provide the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) with a copy of the request and consult with the Board in accordance with section 5136A(b)(1)(B)(i) of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a(b)(1)(B)(i)).
( iii ) *Secretary action on requests.* After consultation with the Board, the Secretary will promptly make a written determination regarding whether the specific activity described in the request is included in an activity category listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and is therefore either financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity.
( 3 ) *What factors will the Secretary consider?* In evaluating a request made under this section, the Secretary will take into account the factors listed in section 5136A(b)(2) of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a(b)(2)) that the Secretary must consider when determining whether an activity is financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity.
( 4 ) *What information must the request contain?* Any request by financial subsidiary under this section must be in writing and must: ( i ) Identify and define the activity for which the determination is sought, specifically describing what the activity would involve and how the activity would be conducted; and
( ii ) Provide information supporting the requested determination, including information regarding how the proposed activity falls into one of the categories listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any other information required by the Secretary concerning the proposed activity.
( b ) [Reserved]
[66 FR 260, Jan. 3, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2740 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2740

To amend the National Housing Act to authorize the Government National 
Mortgage Association to guarantee securities backed by loans guaranteed 
 by the Rural Housing Service under section 538 of the Housing Act of 
                                 1949.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2003

  Mr. Bereuter (for himself, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Mr. Renzi, and Mr. 
  Matheson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Housing Act to authorize the Government National 
Mortgage Association to guarantee securities backed by loans guaranteed 
 by the Rural Housing Service under section 538 of the Housing Act of 
                                 1949.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Multifamily Housing Loan 
Guarantee and Ginnie Mae Corrections Act''.

SEC. 2. GINNIE MAE AUTHORITY TO GUARANTEE SECURITIES.

    The first sentence of section 306(g)(1) of the National Housing Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1721(g)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or title V of the Housing Act of 1949'' ; 
        and
            (2) by inserting after ``1944'' the following: ``, title V 
        of the Housing Act of 1949,''.
                                 <all>
```
1 Filed 10/30/13 P. v. Bowen CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sutter)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. ERIC CHRISTOPHER BOWEN, Defendant and Appellant. C073939 (Super. Ct. No. CRF111257)

Appointed counsel for defe ndant Eric Christopher Bowe n has asked this court to
review the record to determ ine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)2 

### B ACKGROUND In February 2011, then 11-y ear-old C.T. told her mother that defendant had been sexually assaulting her. C.T. reported defe ndant had made her orally copulate him and
forced her to have anal sex. The sexual assau lts started when C.T. was five years old. An information charged defendant with so domy of a child 10 years old or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (a); undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code), oral copulation with a child 10 years old or younger (§ 288.7, su bd. (b)), and lewd and
lascivious conduct with a ch ild under the age of 14 year s old (§ 288, subd. (a)). Defendant pleaded no contest to lewd and lascivious conduct with a child. In exchange for the plea, the trial court gr anted defendant probation. In the ensuing year, the tr ial court found defendant violated his probation twice. After the second violation, the trial c ourt denied further probation and sentenced defendant to a term of eight years in stat e prison and awarded 533 days of presentence
credits. Defendant did not obtain a certif icate of probable cause. (§ 1273.5.)



### D ISCUSSION We appointed counsel to represent defenda nt on appeal. Counsel filed an opening
brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of th e right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and
we have received no communication from defe ndant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable e rror that would result in a disposition more
favorable to defendant.3 

### D ISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

HULL , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

MURRAY , J.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exempt from the 
   windfall elimination provision of such title individuals who are 
  entitled to retired pay based on at least 20 years of service as a 
                     member of a uniformed service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2003

 Mr. Michaud (for himself, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
Filner, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. 
 Ryan of Ohio, and Mr. Frost) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exempt from the 
   windfall elimination provision of such title individuals who are 
  entitled to retired pay based on at least 20 years of service as a 
                     member of a uniformed service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Retirees Government 
Employment Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM WINDFALL ELIMINATION PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 215(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 415(a)(7) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(F) This paragraph shall not apply in the case of an individual 
who is entitled to retired pay based on at least 20 years of service by 
such individual as a member of a uniformed service (as defined in 
section 210(m)).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 215(d)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
415(d)(3)) is amended, in the last sentence, by inserting ``or (F)'' 
after ``subparagraph (E)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

     The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
monthly insurance benefits payable under title II of the Social 
Security Act for months beginning after 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding section 215(f) of the Social 
Security Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall adjust primary 
insurance amounts to the extent necessary to take into account the 
amendments made by section 2.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR VLADIMIR GUZMAN

QUINTANILLA; et al.

,

Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73780

Agency Nos. A206

- 773

- 832

A206

- 773

- 833

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Vladimir Guzman

- Quintanilla and his minor sister, natives and

citizens of El Salvador

, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigrati on judge’s decision

denying their application s for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 73780

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Z ehatye

v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioners

failed to establish the harm they fear would be on account of a protected ground.

See I NS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (19 92) (an applicant “must provide

some evidence of [motive], direct or circumstantial”) ; see also Zetino v. Holder

,
622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from

harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members

bears no nexus to a protected ground”).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

petitioners failed to show it is more likely than not they will be tortured by or with

the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador

. See

Aden v. Holde r , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as unsupported by the record petitioners’ contentions that the BIA

violated their due process rights by using its streamlining procedures or by failing

to explain its reasoning.

1 Petitioners each filed their own application s for relief.3 15

- 73780

The temporary stay of rem oval remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We, Capraro,  Centofranchi,  Kramer & Co., P.C.,  consent to the use of
our  report  dated  March 21,  1997 on the  consolidated  balance  sheeet of DHB
Capital Group, Inc. and  Subisidiaries,  as of December 31, 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of operations,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years ended  December 31, 1996 and 1995,  in its annual  10-KSB dated Marach
25, 1997




                                  /s/Capraro,  Centofranchi,  Kramer & Co., P.C.
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                     Capraro,  Centofranchi,  Kramer & Co., P.C.

South Huntington, New York
March 25, 1997
#### § 1072.105 Notice.

The Bureau shall make available to all Bureau employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the Bureau in a manner that apprises them of the protections against discrimination provided by § 504 and this regulation.