alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


 



Second Amendment to Employment Agreement







This second amendment to the Employment Agreement (the "Second Amendment"), made as of March 3, 2015 by and between Vishay Americas, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay Americas") and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay"), and DAVID VALLETTA ("Executive") (collectively the "Parties").







WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Vishay Americas and is a Party to that certain Employment Agreement made between the Parties as of September 1, 2011, as amended by the first amendment to the Employment Agreement made between the Parties as of March 4, 2014, (collectively, the "Agreement");







WHEREAS, Vishay Americas and Executive may amend the Agreement by mutual agreement in writing pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Agreement; and







 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Second Amendment.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


      1.Section 4.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing "2012" and "25%" in the first sentence with "2015" and "40%", respectively.







2.The amendments to the Agreement made by paragraph 1 of this Second Amendment shall be effective as of March 3, 2015.







3.Except as set forth in this Second Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







4.This Second Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Second Amendment to be executed on its behalf as of the date first above written.







[signature on next page]








VISHAY AMERICAS, INC.







By: /s/ David L. Tomlinson


Name: David L. Tomlinson


Title: Sr VP, Finance and Asst. Sec.


Date: April 29, 2015





































/s/ David Valletta


David Valletta







Date: April 27, 2015
# C_2023014EN.01000601.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/6

---

Call for proposals

SIT 2023 — Ideas that change the world: the EIB Institute’s 2023 Social Innovation Tournament

(2023/C 14/05)

EIB Institute organises its 12th Social Innovation Tournament.

The SIT promotes innovative ideas and rewards initiatives that create social and environmental impact, covering projects in a wide range of fields — from education, healthcare and job creation to new technologies, systems and processes. All projects compete for two prizes in a General Category, and projects addressing this year’s topic of sustainable cities and communities will also compete for two prizes in the Special Category. The winning projects in both categories will be awarded a first or second prize of EUR 100 000 or EUR 40 000, and an Audience Choice Award of EUR 10 000.

Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/EibInstitute

For further information on this tournament and how to submit an innovative proposal, go to: http://institute.eib.org/programmes/social/social-innovation-tournament/

---
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Congo, Republic of (21-914) – Agreement for Economic and Technical Cooperation

# 									Congo, Republic of (21-914) – Agreement for Economic and Technical Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 14, 2021

Foreign Assistance: Economic and Technical Cooperation

Signed at Brazzaville September 14, 2021; entered into force September 14, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [2 MB]

Tags

Foreign AssistanceRepublic of the CongoTreaties

Back to Top
# C_2010285EN.01001401.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/14

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2010/C 285/06

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 21/09/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Finnmark fylkeskommune |
| Henry Karlsens plass 1 |
| 9815 Vadsø |
| NORWAY |
| http://www.ffk.no |

Aid No

GBER 21/09/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Finnmark fylkeskommune

Henry Karlsens plass 1

9815 Vadsø

NORWAY

http://www.ffk.no

Title of the aid measure

Development aid 2009 for Hermetikken Næringshage AS

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Decision from Finnmark County Council

Date 25 August 2009

Ad hoc aid

x

| Hermetikken Næringshage AS |
| --- |
| 9800 Vadsø |
| NORWAY |

Hermetikken Næringshage AS

9800 Vadsø

NORWAY

Date of granting

Ad hoc aid

25.8.2009

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

x

Type of beneficiary

SME

x

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

NOK 0,25 (in millions)

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

x

PART II

| General Objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME-bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects (Article 31) | Fundamental research (Article 31(2)(a)) | ... % | |
| Industrial research (Article 31(2)(b)) | ... % | |
| Experimental development (Article 31(2)(c)) | 4,7 % | |

General Objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME-bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation (Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects (Article 31)

Fundamental research (Article 31(2)(a))

... %

Industrial research (Article 31(2)(b))

... %

Experimental development (Article 31(2)(c))

4,7 %

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2635

To make permanent the reduction in capital gains rates for individuals made 

by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To make permanent the reduction in capital gains rates 

for individuals made by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief 

Reconciliation Act of 2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CAPITAL GAINS RATES FOR IN4 DIVIDUALS MADE PERMANENT. 

5 Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Rec6 onciliation Act of 2003 is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘this title’’ and inserting ‘‘sec8 tion 302’’, and 
2

•HR 2635 IH 

1 (2) in the heading, by striking ‘‘TITLE’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘SECTION 302’’.

Æ
# C_2023123EN.01000601.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 123/06)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Germany

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Germany

Subject of commemoration: Bundeslander series – Hamburg

Description of the design: The design shows the Elbphilharmonie concert hall, Hamburg’s newest landmark. The impressive and detailed representation of the concert building against the background of the maritime urban landscape represents the Land of Hamburg in an exceptionally convincing manner. The left half of the coin’s inner section includes Germany’s issuing country code, ‘D’, the year ‘2023’ and the mintmark of the respective mint (‘A’, ‘D’, ‘F’, ‘G’ or ‘J’). The right half features the artist’s initials, and the lower part features the inscription ‘HAMBURG’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 30 000 000

Date of issue: January 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
§ 1209.52 Post-hearing filings. ( a ) *Proposed findings and conclusions and supporting briefs.* ( 1 ) Using the same method of service for each party, the presiding officer shall serve notice upon each party that the certified transcript, together with all hearing exhibits and exhibits introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing, has been filed with the presiding officer. Any party may file with the presiding officer proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law, and a proposed order within 30 days after the parties have received notice that the transcript has been filed with the presiding officer, unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer.
( 2 ) Proposed findings and conclusions must be supported by citation to any relevant authorities and by page and line references to any relevant portions of the record. A post-hearing brief may be filed in support of proposed findings and conclusions, either as part of the same document or in a separate document.
( 3 ) A party is deemed to have waived any issue not raised in proposed findings or conclusions timely filed by that party.
( b ) *Reply briefs.* Reply briefs may be filed within 15 days after the date on which the parties' proposed findings and conclusions and proposed order are due. Reply briefs shall be limited strictly to responding to new matters, issues, or arguments raised by another party in papers filed in the proceeding. A party who has not filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law or a post-hearing brief may not file a reply brief.
( c ) *Simultaneous filing required.* The presiding officer shall not order the filing by any party of any brief or reply brief supporting proposed findings and conclusions in advance of the other party's filing of its brief.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1916

GREG GIVENS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, 

individually and collectively,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; 

UNITED BANK - DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; 

ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST 

VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE 

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00025-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Murray Hall, JENKINS 

FENSTERMAKER, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Keith C. Gamble, 

PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West 

Virginia; James Thomas McClure, GOMPERS, MCCARTHY & MCCLURE, 

Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Greg Givens appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Givens v. Criswell, No. 5:08-cv-00025-FPS-JSK (N.D. W. Va. 

July 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2023305EN.01000601.xml

| 29.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 August 2023

(2023/C 305/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4530 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85815 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,9000 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9559 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,138 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 382,63 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4735 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,7045 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6839 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4693 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4789 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8283 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4659 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 433,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1598 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8822 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 523,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0306 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,281 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,125 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2633 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0507 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,3040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0808

JPY

Japanese yen

158,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4530

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85815

SEK

Swedish krona

11,9000

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9559

ISK

Iceland króna

142,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,138

HUF

Hungarian forint

382,63

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4735

RON

Romanian leu

4,9360

TRY

Turkish lira

28,7045

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6839

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4693

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4789

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8283

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4659

KRW

South Korean won

1 433,73

ZAR

South African rand

20,1598

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8822

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 523,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0306

PHP

Philippine peso

61,281

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,125

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2633

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0507

INR

Indian rupee

89,3040

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.2

BERNARD CHAUS, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |              |                                                                                                                       |
|--|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |              |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

May 04, 2007

|  | /s/ Barton Heminover        Barton HeminoverChief Financial Officer |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Tajikistan

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Tajikistan			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Tajikistan  

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Tajikistan 

During the review period, the government made significant progress by ensuring the supreme audit institution effectively follows up on findings.The government also made its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.Information on debt obligations, except major state-owned enterprise debt, was made public within a reasonable period.The budget documents did not provide a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures.Budget documents lacked detail regarding expenditures for ministries and agencies and did not identify allocations to, earnings from, or debt holdings of state-owned enterprises.The government did not maintain significant off-budget accounts.While military expenditures were included in the budget, the intelligence budget was not, although parliament reviewed it.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence.The government specified in law or regulation but did not appear to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not publicly available.

Tajikistan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Publishing information on major state-owned enterprise debt obligations;
-  Producing substantially complete and sufficiently detailed budget documents that include allocations to, earnings from, and debt holdings of state-owned enterprises;
-  Following natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice; and
-  Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Tajikistan  

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentTajikistan

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
427 A.2d 243

#### Commonwealth v. Hude, Appellant.

Submitted September 10, 1979.

Thomas F. Traud, Jr., for appellant;

William H. Platt, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and CAVANAUGH, JJ.

Order affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Form  10-KSB of  Calypte  Biomedical
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"),
J. Richard  George,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and
Richard Brounstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) to my knowledge,  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ J. Richard George
----------------------------------------------------
J. Richard George
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005


/s/ Richard D. Brounstein
----------------------------------------------------
Richard D. Brounstein
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Calypte Biomedical Corporation and
will be retained by Calypte  Biomedical  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      IV-3