alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1806.300 Eligible Activities. Recipients of BEA Program Awards must use their payments for the following Eligible Activities: ( a ) CDFI Related Activities;
( b ) Distressed Community Financing Activities; and
( c ) Service Activities, and to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements as further described in the applicable NOFA and the Award Agreement.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Form 10-K of Calypte Biomedical Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), Roger I.
      Gale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jerrold D. Dotson,
      Vice-President - Finance and Administration of the Company, each hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) to
      my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Roger I. GaleRoger
                I. GalePresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                28, 2008/s/
                Jerrold D. DotsonJerrold
                D. DotsonVice
                President –
                Finance and
                AdministrationMarch
                28, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Calypte Biomedical Corporation and will
      be
      retained by Calypte Biomedical and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
EX 10.1 2015.03.31






Exhibit 10.1


FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO THE
PLUM CREEK PENSION PLAN


The Plum Creek Pension Plan (“Plan”), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2012 (“2012 Restatement”), is amended as follows, pursuant to Section 12.1 of Parts A and B of the Plan, effective March 27, 2015:


		
	1.
	Section 7.1 Vesting, in Parts A and B of the Plan, are each amended by adding the following at the end thereof:




Further notwithstanding the foregoing, each Participant who was involuntarily terminated on or after March 27, 2015, and before March 31, 2015, due to the Meridian, Idaho mill closure, and whose employment was not terminated for cause, shall be 100 percent vested.  


		
	2.
	Section 7.1 Vesting, in Parts A and B of the Plan, are each amended by replacing the first sentence in the second paragraph with the following:




In addition, each Participant shall have a 100 percent vested nonforfeitable right to his or her Accrued Benefit on the date he or she attains age 65, provided he or she is an Employee on or after such date.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Fourth Amendment to the Plan to be executed on this 26th day of March, 2015.


	
			
	 
	 
	PLUM CREEK TIMBERLANDS, L.P.


By PLUM CREEK TIMBER I, L.L.C.,
Its General Partner

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Christine Wiltz
	 
	By: /s/ David W. Lambert

	Witness
	 
	David W. Lambert
Senior Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Christine Wiltz
	 
	By: /s/ James A. Kraft

	Witness
	 
	James A. Kraft
Senior Vice President General Counsel 
and Corporate Secretary

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Christine Wiltz
	 
	By: /s/ Barbara Crowe

	Witness
	 
	Barbara Crowe
Vice President, Human Resources
# C_2023251EN.01000201.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 July 2023

(2023/C 251/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1221 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4484 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85590 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,4930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9649 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2105 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,777 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 374,55 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4490 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9439 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,3872 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6350 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4728 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7694 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7589 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4820 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 423,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,2032 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0076 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 797,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0786 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,135 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,864 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3847 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9497 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 92,1985 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1221

JPY

Japanese yen

155,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4484

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85590

SEK

Swedish krona

11,4930

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9649

ISK

Iceland króna

146,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2105

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,777

HUF

Hungarian forint

374,55

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4490

RON

Romanian leu

4,9439

TRY

Turkish lira

29,3872

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6350

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4728

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7694

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7589

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4820

KRW

South Korean won

1 423,03

ZAR

South African rand

20,2032

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0076

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 797,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0786

PHP

Philippine peso

61,135

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,864

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3847

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9497

INR

Indian rupee

92,1985

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 23
                      Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23



                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                [Letterhead]



                        Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
FFY Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 
33-85088 on Form S-8 of FFY Financial Corporation of our report dated August 
5, 1998, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of 
FFY Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and 
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and 
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 
1998, which report is incorporated by reference in the June 30, 1998 annual 
report on Form 10-K of FFY Financial Corporation.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
September 22, 1998
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Rashtrapati Bhavan Cultural Center

New Delhi, India

March 2, 2023

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Good afternoon, everyone.  It’s good to see you all, and I’m especially pleased to see my friend, the foreign minister of Brazil.  We were together just recently with President Lula’s visit.  So a great opportunity to follow up on what we thought was a very successful visit of President Lula to Washington, to the White House.  President Biden felt very positive about the meeting itself, but also the agenda that we set for ourselves (inaudible) to follow up on, as well as, of course, the work we’re doing here at the G20. 

And Brazil will take the G20 mantle after India next year.  And I know that we both want to make sure that the G20 is focused on the issues that are affecting people around the world where our economies, as leading economies, have a responsibility to be making a difference, whether it’s food security, energy security, dealing with climate change, et cetera.

So welcome the opportunity to follow up on our presidents’ meeting, and then the G20 agenda itself.

**FOREIGN MINISTER VIEIRA:**  Yeah.  Wonderful occasion to meet you and your team again.  It’s true we had an excellent meeting of our presidents.  When was that, two – three weeks ago?

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**  Three weeks ago, yeah.

**FOREIGN MINISTER VIEIRA:**  Yeah, three weeks ago in Washington.  It was an excellent meeting at the start of President Lula’s new term.  And it set the days for a period (inaudible) four years at least of a good program of work for our countries, and to launch again our bilateral relations.  Excellent.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**  Thank you, my friend.  Thanks, everyone.

**FOREIGN MINISTER VIEIRA:**  Thank you too.

Tags

BrazilBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUzbekistan

Back to Top
#### § 1510.6 What must the Funding Corporation do with surplus funds?

If the Funding Corporation has funds that are not needed for current interest payments on obligations, it must invest the funds in obligations of the United States issued by the Secretary, in accordance with an investment policy approved by the Secretary.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2746 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2746

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 141 Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut, as the ``Barbara B. 
                    Kennelly Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2746

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 141 Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut, as the ``Barbara B. 
                    Kennelly Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 
Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Barbara B. Kennelly Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barbara B. Kennelly Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 209.1 Authority, purpose, scope, and definitions. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 222, 248, 282, 286-288, 289, 321, 323, 327-328, and 466.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to implement the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act relating to the issuance and cancellation of Federal Reserve Bank stock upon becoming or ceasing to be a member bank, or upon changes in the capital and surplus of a member bank, of the Federal Reserve System. This part also implements the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act relating to the payment of dividends to member banks.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to member banks of the Federal Reserve System, to national banks in process of organization, and to state banks applying for membership. National banks and locally-incorporated banks located in United States dependencies and possessions are eligible (with the consent of the Board) but not required to apply for membership under section 19(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. 466.[1]
( d ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this part— ( 1 ) *Capital Stock and Surplus.* Capital stock and surplus of a member bank means the paid-in capital stock[2] and paid-in surplus of the bank, less any deficit in the aggregate of its retained earnings, gains (losses) on available for sale securities, and foreign currency translation accounts, all as shown on the bank's most recent report of condition. Paid-in capital stock and paid-in surplus of a bank in organization means the amount which is to be paid in at the time the bank commences business.
( 2 ) *Dividend proration basis* means the use of a 360-day year of 12 30-day months for purposes of computing dividend payments.
( 3 ) *Total consolidated assets* means the total assets on the stockholder's balance sheet as reported by the stockholder on its Consolidated Report of Condition and Income (Call Report) as of the most recent December 31, except in the case of: ( i ) A new member “total consolidated assets” means (until the next December 31 Call Report becomes available) the total consolidated assets of the new member at the time of its application for capital stock; and
( ii ) A surviving stockholder after a merger “total consolidated assets” means (until the next December 31 Call Report becomes available) the total consolidated assets reported by that stockholder pursuant to § 209.3(d)(5).
[63 FR 37663, July 13, 1998, as amended by Reg. I, 81 FR 9087, Feb. 24, 2016; 87 FR 2030, Jan. 13, 2022] Footnotes -
209.1
[1] A bank located in the Virgin Islands or Puerto Rico should communicate with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York regarding applications for membership under the provisions of section 19(h) of the Federal Reserve Act. A bank located in Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands should communicate with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco regarding applications for membership under the provisions of section 19(h) of the Federal Reserve Act.
[2] Capital stock includes common stock and preferred stock (including sinking fund preferred stock).
42256.

#### KINNON v. MERCER.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

J. B. Kinnon filed a petition against Mamie K. Mercer seeking a declaratory judgment as to his rights under a deed executed by Mrs. Alice Kinnon, now deceased, on October 23, 1961. The deed, prepared on a warranty deed form, contained typewritten provisions in conflict with the printed provisions. The trial court sustained the defendant’s general demurrer to the petition and in the same judgment construed the deed contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, and the plaintiff appealed. The appeal was transferred to this court by the Supreme Court. See *Kinnon v. Mercer,*222 Ga. 309 (149 SE2d 685). *Held:*

Under the decisions of the Supreme Court in *Crews v. Crews,*174 Ga. 45 (162 SE 107) and *Rainey v. Spence,*185 Ga. 763 (196 SE 416), the deed, though poorly worded, showed that it was the intention of the grantor to grant a life estate to the plaintiff with remainder to the daughter of the grantor and grantee. Therefore, the plaintiff’s petition, which had a *405copy of the deed attached thereto as an exhibit, showed on its face that he was not entitled to the relief sought, and under the decision of the Supreme Court in *State Hwy. Dept. v. Williams Lmbr. Co.,*222 Ga. 23 (148 SE2d 426), the general demurrer which challenged the legal sufficiency of the petition and the right of the petitioner to have his case tried was properly sustained.

Argued September 13, 1966

Decided September 30, 1966.

*Helms & Dismukes, Jack J. Helms,*for appellant.

*Kopp & Heavy, J. Edwin Heavy,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and, Deen, JJ., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0205 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY GOMEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 2 4, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2023

03/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0205
§ 213.5 Renegotiations, extensions, and assumptions. ( a ) *Renegotiation.* A renegotiation occurs when a consumer lease subject to this part is satisfied and replaced by a new lease undertaken by the same consumer. A renegotiation requires new disclosures, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Extension.* An extension is a continuation, agreed to by the lessor and the lessee, of an existing consumer lease beyond the originally scheduled end of the lease term, except when the continuation is the result of a renegotiation. An extension that exceeds six months requires new disclosures, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) *Assumption.* New disclosures are not required when a consumer lease is assumed by another person, whether or not the lessor charges an assumption fee.
( d ) *Exceptions.* New disclosures are not required for the following, even if they meet the definition of a renegotiation or an extension: ( 1 ) A reduction in the rent charge;
( 2 ) The deferment of one or more payments, whether or not a fee is charged;
( 3 ) The extension of a lease for not more than six months on a month-to-month basis or otherwise;
( 4 ) A substitution of leased property with property that has a substantially equivalent or greater economic value, provided no other lease terms are changed;
( 5 ) The addition, deletion, or substitution of leased property in a multiple-item lease, provided the average periodic payment does not change by more than 25 percent; or
( 6 ) An agreement resulting from a court proceeding.
[Reg. M, 61 FR 52258, Oct. 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15367, Apr. 1, 1997]
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                   Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                               ORGANIZATION
<S>                                                             <C>
Fidelity Chemical Products Malaysia SDN.BHD                      Malaysia
OM Holdings, Inc.                                                Delaware
OMG Americas, Inc.                                               Ohio
OMG Asia-Pacific Co., Ltd.                                       Taiwan
OMG Belleville, Limited                                          Canada
OMG Europe GmbH                                                  Germany
OMG Fidelity, Inc.                                               Delaware
OMG Finland Oy                                                   Finland
OMG Harjavalta Chemicals Holding BV                              Netherlands
OMG Harjavalta Nickel Oy                                         Finland
OMG Japan, Inc.                                                  Japan
OMG Jett, Inc.                                                   Ohio
OMG Kokkola Chemicals Holding BV                                 Netherlands
OMG Kokkola Chemicals Oy                                         Finland
OMG Chemicals Pte, Ltd.                                          Singapore
OMG Thailand Co., Ltd.                                           Thailand
OMG Vasset, S.A.                                                 France
Harko CV                                                         Netherlands
Groupement Pour Le Traitement Du teril De Lubumbashi (55%)       Jersey
Societe De Traitement du Terril De Lubumbashi (55%)              DRC
OMG Cawse Pty Ltd.                                               Australia
OMG U.K. Limited                                                 United Kingdom
OMG KG Holdings, Inc.                                            Delaware
</TABLE>
Exhibit 24.5

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS  that I, Richard A.  Michaelson,  in my
individual  capacity  and  as  Director  of  Unilab   Corporation,   a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"),  hereby  constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, David
C. Weavil and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone, from
the date hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in writing,
to act as my true and lawful  agent and  attorney-in-fact,  in my name and on my
behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend and/or
modify  and  deliver  one or more  registration  statements  for the  filing  of
securities  of the Company  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  as amended (the
"Securities  Act") and any and all  filings  made by or on behalf of the Company
with the United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  pursuant  to the
Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 18th day of March, 1998.

                                                   /s/ Richard A. Michaelson
                                                   Richard A. Michaelson
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50872 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ARMANDO MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-798-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Armando Martinez-Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.