alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER02-2001-009; Docket No. ER07-559-000]


Electric Quarterly Reports; Flat Earth Energy, LLC; Notice of 
Revocation of Market-Based Rate Tariff

January 2, 2009.
    On November 20, 2008, the Commission issued an order announcing its 
intent to revoke the market-based rate authority of the above captioned 
public utility, which had failed to file its required Electric 
Quarterly Reports.\1\ The Commission provided the utility fifteen days 
in which to file its overdue Electric Quarterly Reports or face 
revocation of its market-based rate tariff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Electric Quarterly Reports, 125 FERC ] 61,203 (2008) 
(November 20 Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Order No. 2001, the Commission revised its public utility filing 
requirements and established a requirement for public utilities, 
including power marketers, to file Electric Quarterly Reports 
summarizing the contractual terms and conditions in their agreements 
for all jurisdictional services (including market-based power sales, 
cost-based power sales, and transmission service) and providing 
transaction information (including rates) for short-term and long-term 
power sales during the most recent calendar quarter.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements, Order No. 2001, 
67 Fed. Reg. 31,043, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,127, reh'g denied, 
Order No. 2001-A, 100 FERC ] 61,074, reconsideration and 
clarification denied, Order No. 2001-B, 100 FERC ] 61,342, order 
directing filings, Order No. 2001-C, 101 FERC ] 61,314 (2002), order 
directing filing, Order No. 2001-D, 102 FERC ] 61,334 (2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the November 20 Order, the Commission directed Flat Earth 
Energy, LLC to file the required Electric Quarterly Reports within 15 
days of the date of issuance of the order or face revocation of its 
authority to sell power at market-based rates and termination of its 
electric market-based rate tariff. \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ November 20 Order at Ordering Paragraph A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The time period for compliance with the November 20 Order has 
elapsed. The company identified in the November 20 Order (Flat Earth 
Energy, LLC) has failed to file its delinquent Electric Quarterly 
Reports.
    The Commission hereby revokes this company's market-based rate 
authority and terminates the electric market-based rate tariff.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23949 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 1102

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

#### § 1102.32 Notice of Intention to Commence a Proceeding.

The ASC shall instruct the Secretary or other designated officer acting for the ASC to publish in the Federal Register a Notice of Intention To Commence A Proceeding (Notice of Intention). The Notice of Intention shall be served upon the party or parties to the proceeding and shall commence at the time of service. The Notice of Intention shall state the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the proceeding is to be held; shall contain, or incorporate by appropriate reference, a specific statement of the matters of fact or law constituting the grounds for the proceeding; and shall state a date no sooner than 25 days after service of the Notice of Intention is made for termination of the information-gathering phase of the proceeding. The Notice of Intention also must contain a bold-faced warning respecting the effect of a failure to file a Rebuttal or Notice Not To Contest under § 1102.33(d) of this subpart. The ASC may amend a Notice of Intention in any manner and to the extent consistent with provisions of applicable law.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of two (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: March 31, 2022  By: 
/s/ Kevin Hartz
   **Kevin Hartz**   
**Co-Chief Executive Officer**

**(Principal Financial Officer)**
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JACINTO PEREZ-ORTIZ, a.k.a. Jacinto

Ortiz Perez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10445

D.C. No. 4:08-cr-00351-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

Jacinto Perez-Ortiz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month

sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Perez-Ortiz’s counsel has

FILED

OCT 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10445

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Santo Curro, Respondent, *v.*Tony Altieri, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

November, 1900.)

General release — Not to be varied by parol evidence.

Parol evidence is inadmissible to show that a certain demand, made the subject of an action by a party releasing against the party released, was intended to be excepted from the operation of a general release theretofore executed between the parties.

*691Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

Mooney *&*Shipman, for appellant.

J. Krone, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The effect of the testimony to which the counsel for the appellant objected was that although the plaintiff had executed a general release on the 6th day of October, 1899, releasing the defendant of all claims that he, the plaintiff, had against him, the defendant, yet, nevertheless, one particular claim, viz., the claim in suit, was excluded from the effects of the said general release. To admit this testimony was error. It was admitting parol evidence which varied the terms of a written instrument. The release is general and comprehensive, and reaches every debt due defendant to the plaintiff. To show by parol evidence that it was not intended to release every claim that the plaintiff had against the defendant is to contradict the instrument. Pierson v. Hooker, 3 Johns. 68.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.-

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
# C_2023115EN.01000301.xml

| 30.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 March 2023

(2023/C 115/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0847 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4495 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87988 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2955 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9973 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,3005 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,631 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 379,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6870 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,7500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6252 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4739 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5147 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7405 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4425 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 411,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,6494 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4679 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 335,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7927 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,007 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,086 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5958 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7327 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,2985 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0847

JPY

Japanese yen

143,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4495

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87988

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2955

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9973

ISK

Iceland króna

148,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,3005

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,631

HUF

Hungarian forint

379,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6870

RON

Romanian leu

4,9500

TRY

Turkish lira

20,7500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6252

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4739

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5147

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7405

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4425

KRW

South Korean won

1 411,29

ZAR

South African rand

19,6494

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4679

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 335,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7927

PHP

Philippine peso

59,007

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,086

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5958

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7327

INR

Indian rupee

89,2985

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1235.5 Record hold. ( a ) *Notification by FHFA.* In the event that FHFA is requiring a record hold, FHFA shall notify the chief executive officer of the regulated entity or the Office of Finance. Regulated entities and the Office of Finance must have a written policy for handling notice of a record hold.
( b ) *Notification by a regulated entity or the Office of Finance.* The record retention program of a regulated entity and the Office of Finance shall— ( 1 ) Address how employees and, as appropriate, how agents or independent contractors consistent with their respective roles and responsibilities to the regulated entity or the Office of Finance, will receive prompt notification of a record hold;
( 2 ) Designate an individual to communicate specific requirements and instructions, including, when necessary, the instruction to cease immediately any otherwise permissible destruction of records; and
( 3 ) Provide that any employee and, as appropriate, any agent or independent contractor consistent with his or her respective role and responsibility to the regulated entity or Office of Finance, who has received notice of a potential investigation, enforcement proceeding, or litigation by FHFA involving the regulated entity or the Office of Finance or an employee, or otherwise has actual knowledge that an issue is subject to such an investigation, enforcement proceeding or litigation, shall notify immediately the legal department or the individual providing legal services as well as senior management of the regulated entity or the Office of Finance and shall retain any records that may be relevant in any way to such investigation, enforcement proceeding, or litigation.
( c ) *Method of record retention during a record hold.* The record retention program of each regulated entity and the Office of Finance shall address the method by which the regulated entity or the Office of Finance will retain records during a record hold. Specifically, the program shall describe the method for the continued preservation of electronic records, including e-mail, and, as applicable, the conversion of records from paper to electronic form as well as any alternative storage method.
( d ) *Access to and retrieval of records during a record hold.* The record retention program of each regulated entity or the Office of Finance shall ensure access to and retrieval of records by the regulated entity and the Office of Finance, and access, upon request, by FHFA, during a record hold. Such access shall be by reasonable means, consistent with the nature and availability of the records and existing information technology.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.19

                               RELEASE OF GUARANTY

     This RELEASE OF GUARANTY is dated as of December 30, 2005 by Wachovia Bank
of Delaware, National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee") and delivered to
Canadian TODS Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation, Lamar Transit Advertising
Canada, Ltd., a British Columbia corporation and Lamar Canadian Outdoor Company,
a Nova Scotia corporation (collectively, the "Canadian Subsidiaries").
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to such terms in that certain Indenture dated as of December 23,2002 (the "2002
Indenture") among Lamar Media Corp. (the "Company"), the Guarantors party
thereto and the Trustee.

     1. The Canadian Subsidiaries have requested that they be released as
Guarantors pursuant to Section 10.05 of the 2002 Indenture, and the Trustee has
agreed, as provided herein, to release the Canadian Subsidiaries from all
guarantee obligations.

     2. The Canadian Subsidiaries are guarantors with respect to outstanding
Indebtedness of the Company consisting of obligations of the Company under (a)
the 2002 Indenture and (b) that certain Indenture dated as of August 16, 2005
(the "2005 Indenture") among the Company, the Guarantors party thereto and The
Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.

     3. The Trustee hereby agrees to release the Guarantees of the Canadian
Subsidiaries under the 2002 Indenture, such release to be effective
automatically upon satisfaction of the following conditions:

          (a) The delivery to the Trustee by The Bank of New York Trust Company,
     N.A., as trustee with respect to the 2005 Indenture of an executed release
     of the guarantees of the Canadian Subsidiaries in respect the Indebtedness
     of the Company under the 2005 Indenture;

          (b) The delivery to the Trustee of the Opinion of Counsel required to
     be delivered pursuant to Section 10.05 of the 2002 Indenture; and

          (c) The delivery to the Trustee of the Officer's Certificate required
     to be delivered pursuant to Section 10.05 of the 2002 Indenture.

                           [Signature page to follow]

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Release of Guaranty to
be duly executed as an instrument under seal as of the date set forth above.

                                        WACHOVIA BANK OF DELAWARE, N.A.,
                                        as Trustee


                                        By: /s/ Laura Bass
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Laura Bass
                                        Title: Assistant Vice President
# C_2022437EN.01000301.xml

| 17.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/3

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2022/C 437/03)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AST/155/22 – Security and safety assistants (AST 3) in the following fields:

| 1. | Operational security |
| --- | --- |

1.

Operational security

| 2. | Technical security |
| --- | --- |

2.

Technical security

| 3. | Occupational health and safety |
| --- | --- |

3.

Occupational health and safety

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 437 A of 17 November 2022.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
§ 19.184 Service of subpoena and payment of witness expenses. ( a ) *Methods of service.* Service of a subpoena may be made by any of the methods identified in § 19.11(d).
( b ) *Expenses.* The fees and expenses specified in § 19.14 apply to a witness who is subpoenaed to testify pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) *Area of service.* Subpoenas issued in connection with a formal investigation proceeding that require the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of documents, including electronically stored information, may be served on any person or entity within any State, territory, or possession of the United States or the District of Columbia, or as otherwise provided by law. Foreign nationals are subject to such subpoenas if service is made upon a duly authorized agent located in the United States or in accordance with international requirements for service of subpoenas.
#### § 1806.105 OMB control number.

The collections of information contained in this part have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and assigned the applicable, approved OMB Control Numbers associated with the CDFI Fund under 1559.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Tiberio Dall'Olio, the Chief Executive Officer of Madeco S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 

 

1.	the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

Date: June 30, 2004 

 

 

/s/ Tiberio Dall'Olio

Tiberio Dall'Olio

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.5 3-31-15




                                                                                                                                           Exhibit 10.5
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SPARTON CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, Sparton Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the Sparton Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of January 1, 2014; and
WHEREAS, Sparton Corporation has adopted and shareholders have approved the Sparton Corporation 2010 Long-Term Stock Option Incentive Plan
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.10 of the Plan the Company has the authority to amend the plan to the extent permitted by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A; and
WHEREAS, the Company does hereby desire to amend the Plan to permit the participation of their Board of Directors (the “Directors”);
WEHREAS, the plan needs to be amended to include such eligible forms of director compensation;
WHEREAS, the company desires to expand the eligible forms of compensation for non-directors, the plan will be amended to include Restricted Stock Units;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by adoption of the following Resolutions:
RESOLVED, the plan hereby amends Article 1 Section 1.1 as follows: 
By deleting the definition of “Eligible Employee” and replace it as follows: 
“Eligible Employee” means any employee of the Company or an Affiliate and any member of the Board of Directors who is selected to participate herein in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 hereof, and is one of a select group of management or highly compensated employees.
By adding the following definition for “Board of Directors” 
“Board of Directors” means any properly elected member of the Company’s or an Affiliate’s Board of Directors and any independent contractor who is a member of a committee, if such committee is established by and its members appointed by the Board of Directors.
By adding the following definition for “Restricted Stock Units”
“Restricted Stock Units” is defined under section 2 of the Sparton Corporation 2010 Long-Term Stock Option Incentive Plan.
By adding the following at the end of the definition of “Pay Type”

Detroit_3741174_1




For purposes of clarification, as of July 1, 2014, the following chart reflects the types of compensation included as “Pay Types” and the associated maximum deferral percentage for each.
	
		
	Eligible Pay Type
	Maximum Deferral Percentage

	Base Salary
	80%

	Annual Bonus
	80%

	Annual Commissions
	80%

	Director Fees
	100%

	401k Refund
	100%

	Restricted Stock Units
	100%






FURTHER RESOLVED, Restricted Stock Units shall be added to the list of Pay Types in Section I of the Adoption Agreement.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President of Human Resources shall be delegated with the responsibility to carry out such actions necessary to effect the eligibility, enrollment and communication of the Plan to the Eligible Employees; and 
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this shall become effective as of July 1, 2014. 
Signed:     __/s/_Steve Korwin__________
Name:    __Steve Korwin_____________
Title:    _SVP Quality & Engineering___
Date:    __7/1/2014________________

Detroit_3741174_1
§ 1081.306 Record in proceedings before hearing officer; retention of documents; copies. ( a ) *Contents of the record.* The record of the proceeding consists of: ( 1 ) The notice of charges, the answer, and any amendments thereto;
( 2 ) Each motion, submission, or other paper filed in the proceedings, and any amendments and exceptions to or regarding them;
( 3 ) Each stipulation, transcript of testimony, and any document or other item admitted into evidence;
( 4 ) Any transcript of a conference or hearing before the hearing officer;
( 5 ) Any amicus briefs filed pursuant to § 1081.216;
( 6 ) With respect to a request to disqualify a hearing officer or to allow the hearing officer's withdrawal under § 1081.105(c), each affidavit or transcript of testimony taken and the decision made in connection with the request;
( 7 ) All motions, briefs, and other papers filed on interlocutory appeal;
( 8 ) All proposed findings and conclusions;
( 9 ) Each written order issued by the hearing officer or Director; and
( 10 ) Any other document or item accepted into the record by the hearing officer.
( b ) *Retention of documents not admitted.* Any document offered into evidence but excluded will not be considered part of the record. The Office of Administrative Adjudication will retain any such document until the later of the date upon which an order by the Director ending the proceeding becomes final and not appealable, or upon the conclusion of any judicial review of the Director's order.
( c ) *Substitution of copies.* A true copy of a document may be substituted for any document in the record or any document retained pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.