alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10-2**

 

**THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.**

**2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**OPTION AWARD CERTIFICATE**

 

This Certificate, when executed by a duly authorizedofficer of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”), evidences the grant tothe Participant named herein of an Option to purchase shares of the CommonStock of the Company in accordance with the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

 

1.             Participant:

 

2.             Number of shares of Common Stock subject tothe Option:  

 

3.             Option Price:  $       pershare

 

4.             Effective date of the Option:

 

5.             Expiration Date of the Option:

 

6.             Type of  Option:

 

7.             Option Vesting Period (see Plan document forcomplete details):

 

With respect to the shares subject to the Option, aParticipant may exercise 25% of such shares beginning one year after theeffective date of the Option, 50% of such shares beginning two years after theeffective date of the Option, 75% of such shares beginning three years afterthe effective date of the Option and 100% of such shares beginning four yearsafter the effective date of the Option.

 

8.             Employee shall make such arrangements withthe Company with respect to income tax withholding as the Company shalldetermine in its sole discretion is appropriate to ensure payment of federal,state or local income taxes.

 

9.             An Option may be exercised only by a writtennotice to the Company of intent to exercise such Option with respect to aspecific number of shares of the Common Stock (minimum of 500 shares or theentire amount vested if less than 500 shares) and payment to the Company of theamount of the option price multiplied by the number of shares of the CommonStock so specified.

 

10.           The Option is subject to, and governed by,all of the terms of the Plan.  Byacceptance of this Certificate, the Participant agrees to abide by all terms and  conditions of thePlan.  Terms defined in the Plan are usedin this Certificate as so defined.

 

**This Certificate is not a security and does not represent the Optiondescribed herein but, rather, describes the Option granted to the Participantas reflected on the books and records of the Company.  Neither this Certificate nor the Optionrepresented hereby are assignable or transferable bythe Participant except as otherwise permitted under the Plan.**

 
|   | The Navigators Group, Inc. |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   | By:                        |   |   |
|   |                       | Stanley A. Galanski |   |
|   |                       | President & Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
# Official Journal C 218A/6 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 218A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 486 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 218A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 486 September 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 218A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for Director — (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10003 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 218A/1

Publication of a vacancy for Director — (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10003

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

III Notices

Commission

| 6.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 218/1

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10003

(2005/C 218 A/01)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for the Institute for Health and Consumer Protection of the Directorate-General Joint Research Centre in Ispra (Italy).

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

To be eligible candidates must: - be a citizen of a European Union Member State; - hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies; - have at least 15 years' postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission, including at least five years at a high management level; - have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

and follow the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration.

The closing date for registration is 6 October 2005. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

---
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 15-1779 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. BRIAN ERICK MONTES-FOSSE, Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court issued on May 31, 2016, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 4, change "the day" to "that day"
15A NCAC 02D .0409 is amended as published in 23:18 NCR 1888 as follows: 

15A NCAC 02D .0409 PM10 PARTICULATE MATTER 

(a) The ambient air quality standards standard for PM10 particulate matter are: is

(1) 150 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3), 24-hour average concentration. concentration; and

(2) 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3), annual arithmetic mean.

These standards are This standard is attained when the annual arithmetic mean concentration is less than or 

equal to 50 ug/m3, and when the 99th percentile 24-hour concentration is less than or equal to 150 ug/m3, as 

determined according to Appendix N of 40 CFR Part 50. 50, is not exceeded more than once per year on 

average over a three-year period.

(b) For the purpose of determining attainment of the standards in Paragraph (a) of this Rule, particulate matter 

shall be measured in the ambient air as PM10 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a 

nominal 10 micrometers) by either: 

(1) a reference method based on Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 50 and designated according to 40 

CFR Part 53; or 

(2) an equivalent method designated according to 40 CFR Part 53. 

History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.107(a)(3); 

Eff. July 1, 1988; 

Amended Eff. January 1, 2010; April 1, 1999.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2096

DAGOBERTO MEJIA

- ALVARADO , Petitioner ,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : February 27, 2020 Decided: March 6, 2020

Before KING, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.
Dismissed in part, denied in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Dagoberto Mejia

- Alvarado, Petitioner Pro Se. Todd J. Cochran, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Dagoberto Mejia

- Alvarado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. While
M ejia

- Alvarado claims on appeal that he qualified for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, and further requests a grant of cancellation of removal, he did not administratively exhaust these claims before the B oard. “[A]rguments that a petitioner did not raise in the [Board] proceedings have not been exhausted and the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider them.” Cabrera v. Barr , 930 F.3d 627, 631 (4th Cir. 2019); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2018) (stating t hat Court “may review a final order of removal only if . . . the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right”). “Only after the [Board] has rendered a decision on an argument or claim is that argument or claim said t o have been exhausted.” Cabrera , 930 F.3d at 631. “In sum, we have consistently held that . . . when a petition contains an argument that has never been presented to the [Board] for consideration, we lack jurisdiction to consider it even if other argumen ts in the petition have been exhausted.” Id

. Accordingly, as Mejia

- Alvarado ’s claims for relief h a ve not been administratively exhausted, we lack jurisdiction to consider them and dismiss the petition for review with respect to th ose claims. To the exten t Mejia

- Alvarado challenges the Board’s denial of his request for remand, we have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion. See Obioha v. Gonzales , 431 F.3d 400, 408 (4th Cir. 2005); see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2019). We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated3 by the Board. In re Mejia

- Alvarado (B.I.A. Sept. 19, 2019)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED IN PART, DEN IED IN PART
# C_2022407EN.01000401.xml

| 24.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 October 2022

(2022/C 407/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9730 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87728 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0868 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9855 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,511 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 412,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7885 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0988 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5646 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3465 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,6376 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7347 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3917 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0021 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0504 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 199,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6101 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,287 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,349 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1117 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5521 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,7390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9730

JPY

Japanese yen

147,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87728

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0868

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9855

ISK

Iceland króna

141,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,511

HUF

Hungarian forint

412,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7885

RON

Romanian leu

4,9125

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0988

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5646

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3465

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,6376

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7347

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3917

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,32

ZAR

South African rand

18,0021

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0504

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 199,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6101

PHP

Philippine peso

57,287

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,349

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1117

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5521

INR

Indian rupee

80,7390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.1.5



                                  DATUM INC.
                               FIFTH AMENDMENT
                                      TO
                          1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


        As approved by the stockholders of Datum Inc. (the "Company") at the
Company's duly called, noticed and held annual meeting of stockholders of June
8, 2000, the Company's 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is amended as of
such date such that the second and third sentences of Section 2 of the Plan are
amended and restated in their entirety as follows:

        The total number of shares of Common Stock of the Company which may be
        issued under the Plan shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 1,477,217
        shares which amount shall increase by 2% of the number of shares of
        common stock outstanding as of the Company's fiscal year-end. The
        aggregate maximum number of shares represented by options or rights to
        purchase under this Plan that may be granted or offered under stock
        options or rights to purchase to any one person may not exceed one
        hundred fifty thousand (150,000) shares per calendar year.
#### § 210.14 Extension of time limits.

If a bank (including a Reserve Bank) or nonbank payor is delayed in acting on an item beyond applicable time limits because of interruption of communication or computer facilities, suspension of payments by a bank or nonbank payor, war, emergency conditions, failure of equipment, or other circumstances beyond its control, its time for acting is extended for the time necessary to complete the action, if it exercises such diligence as the circumstances require.

[Reg. J, 59 FR 22967, May 4, 1994]
#### ELMORE LUMBER COMPANY V. NIXON.

(Decided December 17, 1912.)

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Frank W. Lull, for appellant. J. M. Holly, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of *Tice v. The State,*3 Ala. App. 164; 57 South. 506.
§ 1808.306 Conditions precedent to Bond and Bond Loan. The ability of the Qualified Issuer to issue a Bond and make a Bond Loan shall be subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent: ( a ) Evidence satisfactory to the Qualified Issuer that the Eligible CDFI will comply with the terms and conditions of the Bond Loan documents, including repayment of the Bond Loan;
( b ) Evidence satisfactory to the Qualified Issuer, the Guarantor, and the CDFI Fund that the Eligible CDFI has the authority to enter into the Bond Loan, has secured the Credit Enhancement, if any, demonstrated a reasonable prospect of repayment of the Bond Loan, and pledged the collateral (including executed security documents, UCC-1 financing statements or mortgages, as applicable);
( c ) A Guarantee Application that has been approved by the Guarantor;
( d ) A satisfactory credit review by the CDFI Fund and in compliance with the Bond Loan Requirements, including submission of complete and accurate Guarantee Application materials, submitted in a timely manner, demonstrating the Eligible CDFI's ability to repay the Bond Loan;
( e ) Opinions of legal counsel to the Qualified Issuer and the Eligible CDFI;
( f ) Executed Bond Loan documents;
( g ) Organizational documents of the Eligible CDFI;
( h ) Certifications by the Qualified Issuer and Eligible CDFIs that Bond Proceeds and Bond Loan proceeds will not be used for lobbying by recipients of Federal loans or guarantees;
( i ) A statement that no default, event of default, or due and unsatisfied liability has occurred and is continuing with respect to any obligations of the Qualified Issuer and each Eligible CDFI to the CDFI Fund, the Guarantor, the Bond Purchaser, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or any other agency, authority or instrumentality of the Federal Government; and
( j ) Any other conditions precedent set forth in the Bond Loan documents, including documentation that any credit enhancements have been secured by the Eligible CDFI.
#### § 1807.106 Presumptive Compliance with Other Federal Programs.

The CDFI Fund may deem certain other Federal program requirements, designations and/or reporting criteria as being Presumptively Compliant with any of the CMF program requirements set forth herein. Recipients participating in and meeting the program requirements of such designated Federal programs may be deemed compliant with certain CMF program requirements, as provided for in the Assistance Agreement or other CDFI Fund guidance and materials.
§ 1805.303 Technical assistance. ( a ) *General.* The CDFI Fund may provide technical assistance to build the capacity of a CDFI or an entity that proposes to become a CDFI. Such technical assistance may include: training for management and other personnel; development of programs, products and services; improving financial management and internal operations; enhancing a CDFI's community impact; or other activities deemed appropriate by the CDFI Fund. The CDFI Fund, in its sole discretion, may provide technical assistance in amounts or under terms and conditions that are different from those requested by an Applicant or Recipient. The CDFI Fund may not provide any technical assistance funding to an Applicant for the purpose of assisting in the preparation of an application for federal assistance. The CDFI Fund may provide technical assistance to a CDFI directly, through grants, or by contracting with organizations that possess the appropriate expertise.
( b ) The CDFI Fund may provide technical assistance regardless of whether the Recipient also receives financial assistance under this part. Technical assistance provided pursuant to this part is subject to the assistance limits described in § 1805.402.
( c ) An Applicant seeking technical assistance must meet the eligibility requirements described in § 1805.200 and submit an application as described in § 1805.600.
( d ) Applicants for technical assistance pursuant to this part will be evaluated pursuant to the merit-based qualitative review criteria in subpart G of this part, except as otherwise may be provided in the applicable Notice of Funds Availability. In addition, the requirements for matching funds are not applicable to technical assistance requests.
1The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1911

___________

Benjamin E. Schreiber, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Matt Murphy; Don Kirkendall, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1999

 Filed: October 13, 1999

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin E. Schreiber appeals from the district court’s1 order granting summary

judgment in favor of defendant jail officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm

for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...Results and Impact – PEPFAR

# 									Results and Impact – PEPFAR							

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Over the past 21 years, PEPFAR has had remarkable lifesaving results. As of September 30, 2023, the U.S. President Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) supported antiretroviral treatment for nearly 20.5 million people. 

PEPFAR has enabled 5.5 million babies to be born HIV-free to mothers living with HIV. The program has provided critical care and support for 7 million orphans, vulnerable children, and their caregivers so they can survive and thrive.

PEPFAR has helped prevent HIV infection in men and boys, including by supporting 32.5 million voluntary medical male circumcisions in east and Southern Africa. Since 2015, new HIV diagnoses among adolescent girls and young women have declined in all geographic areas implementing the PEPFAR-led DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe) public-private partnership.

PEPFAR’s investments also strengthen the systems that drive effective, efficient, and sustainable health care. PEPFAR is directly supporting 327,000 health workers to deliver and improve HIV care and other health services, creating a lasting health system for partner countries to confront other current and future health challenges.

Back to Top
§ 1214.2 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to control the dissemination of non-public information, which includes confidential supervisory information, and maintain its controlled, sensitive, privileged, or proprietary nature, as appropriate.
( b ) *Scope.* This part imposes a broad-based prohibition against unauthorized disclosure of any non-public information. This part does not supersede the regulations at 12 CFR part 1202 (governing disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act); 12 CFR part 1204 (governing disclosure under the Privacy Act); and the sections describing permitted disclosures in any FHFA rules on Federal Home Loan Bank Information Sharing or on the FHFA Public Use Database.
( c ) These provisions also do not supersede or otherwise alter the rights or liabilities created by 5 U.S.C. 7211 (governing disclosures to Congress); 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) (governing disclosures of illegality, waste, fraud, abuse, or public health or safety threats); or 12 U.S.C. 3401 (governing disclosure of financial institution customer information).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as DHB
Industries, Inc.) (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James F. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 18, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES F.
ANDERSON
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | James F. Anderson      
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.