alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4462

SHELLY LEE ANDERSON, JR., a/k/a

Shelly Anderson,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.

Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(CR-00-934)

Submitted: January 24, 2002

Decided: February 8, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

John H. Hare, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellant. William Kenneth Witherspoon, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Shelly Lee Anderson, Jr., pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute greater than 500 grams but less than five kilograms

of cocaine and was sentenced to sixty months of imprisonment and

five years of supervised release. Anderson’s attorney has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but raises

two issues: whether the district court complied with Fed. R. Crim. P.

11 and whether Anderson was properly sentenced. For the reasons

that follow, we affirm. 

First, we do not find that the district court committed reversible

error in conducting its Rule 11 colloquy with Anderson at the plea

hearing. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(h) (noting that any variance from

Rule 11 that does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded);

United States v. Goins, 51 F.3d 400, 402 (4th Cir. 1995) (stating

review standard). Second, we find no error in Anderson’s sentence.

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b); United States v. Pinckney, 938 F.2d 519,

522 (4th Cir. 1991). 

We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with

the requirements of Anders, and find no meritorious issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires that counsel inform his

client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the

United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous,

then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served

on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON
**State Facility Name**  **Facility ID (ORISPL) Year**  **Program(s) Selected SO2 (tons)** 

NH Merrimack 2364 2012ARP 1,004.2 NH Merrimack 2364 2013 ARP 1,400.5 NH Merrimack 2364 2014ARP 1,044.0
Data source: EPA's Air Market's Program website at: http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/
# C_2022412EN.01000201.xml

| 27.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 October 2022

(2022/C 412/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0023 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4381 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86603 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9530 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9917 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3408 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,535 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 408,09 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8806 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,6461 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5466 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3568 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,8678 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7249 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4104 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 422,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0212 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1948 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 589,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7262 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,493 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,862 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2944 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8501 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,2060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0023

JPY

Japanese yen

147,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4381

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86603

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9530

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9917

ISK

Iceland króna

143,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3408

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,535

HUF

Hungarian forint

408,09

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7548

RON

Romanian leu

4,8806

TRY

Turkish lira

18,6461

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5466

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3568

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,8678

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7249

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4104

KRW

South Korean won

1 422,11

ZAR

South African rand

18,0212

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1948

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 589,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7262

PHP

Philippine peso

58,493

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,862

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2944

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8501

INR

Indian rupee

82,2060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GerardE. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  | May 7, 2004                                  |   | /s/ Gerard E. Puorro |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Gerard E. Puorro                             |
|   |  President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2666

To authorize funds for fiscal year 2004 for research, development, test, 

and evaluation for a prototype multi-role, long-range sniper system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2003

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To authorize funds for fiscal year 2004 for research, development, test, and evaluation for a prototype multi-role, 

long-range sniper system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING FOR PROTOTYPE 

4 MULTI-ROLE LONG-RANGE SNIPER SYSTEM. 

5 Of the amount made available under section 201 of 

6 the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

7 2004 for Defense-Wide research, development, test, and 

8 evaluation for fiscal year 2004, $475,000 shall be available 

9 for a prototype multi-role, long-range sniper system capa-
2

•HR 2666 IH 

1 ble of firing a 30-millimeter projectile to a range of ap2 proximately 4,500 yards.

Æ
# C_2021520EN.01000501.xml

| 27.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 520/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 520/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 December 2021

(2021/C 520/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1301 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2906 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0432 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0613 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,240 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 368,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6320 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9503 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 14,0719 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5758 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4589 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8155 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6674 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5422 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9668 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1999 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5208 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 102,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7617 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,772 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,4396 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,130 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4616 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4700 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,4070 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1301

JPY

Japanese yen

129,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84900

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2906

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0432

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0613

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,240

HUF

Hungarian forint

368,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6320

RON

Romanian leu

4,9503

TRY

Turkish lira

14,0719

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5758

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4589

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8155

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6674

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5422

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,25

ZAR

South African rand

17,9668

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1999

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5208

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 102,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7617

PHP

Philippine peso

56,772

RUB

Russian rouble

83,4396

THB

Thai baht

38,130

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4616

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4700

INR

Indian rupee

85,4070

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### ARNOLD V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 23, 1913.)

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2023002EN.01001801.xml

| 4.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/18

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

2,50 % on 1 January 2023

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 January 2023

(2023/C 2/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0545 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4370 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88048 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1430 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9879 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,124 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 403,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6831 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9310 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,7566 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5708 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4414 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2392 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6932 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4188 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0190 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2863 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 471,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6439 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,020 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,254 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6656 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5283 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,4095 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0545

JPY

Japanese yen

137,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4370

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88048

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1430

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9879

ISK

Iceland króna

151,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,124

HUF

Hungarian forint

403,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6831

RON

Romanian leu

4,9310

TRY

Turkish lira

19,7566

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5708

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4414

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2392

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6932

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4188

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,51

ZAR

South African rand

18,0190

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2863

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 471,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6439

PHP

Philippine peso

59,020

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,254

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6656

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5283

INR

Indian rupee

87,4095

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
*This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 **The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMBO NJIE,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 10-71019

Agency No. A096-634-115

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 9, 2011** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, FISHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because

Njie’s testimony about the purported arrest warrant was internally contradictory

and contradicted the copy of the warrant submitted as evidence, and the

inconsistencies were not trivial. See Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1044 (9th

FILED

MAR 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Cir. 2010). In the absence of credible testimony or documentary evidence, the

BIA’s denial of all relief was supported by substantial evidence because Njie failed

to carry his burdens of proof to show a well-founded fear of persecution or

likelihood of torture. Consequently, we need not reach Njie’s other arguments.

PETITION DENIED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2714

To reauthorize the State Justice Institute. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2003

Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To reauthorize the State Justice Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Justice Institute 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 Section 215 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 

8 (42 U.S.C. 10713) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OFAPPROPRIATIONS

10 ‘‘SEC. 215. There are authorized to be appropriated 

11 to carry out the purposes of this title, $7,000,000 for each 

12 of fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. Amounts ap-
2

•HR 2714 IH 

1 propriated for each such year are to remain available until 

2 expended.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS. 

4 (a) STATUS OF INSTITUTE.—Section 205(c) of the 

5 State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(c)) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(3) The Institute may purchase goods and services 

9 from the General Services Administration in order to carry 

10 out its functions.’’. 

11 (b) STATUS AS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OFTHE

12 UNITED STATES.—Section 205(d)(2) of the State Justice 

13 Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(d)(2)) is amended 

14 by inserting ‘‘, notwithstanding section 8914 of such title’’ 

15 after ‘‘(relating to health insurance)’’. 

16 (c) MEETINGS.—Section 204(j) of the State Justice 

17 Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10703(j)) is amended 

18 by inserting ‘‘(on any occasion on which that committee 

19 has been delegated the authority to act on behalf of the 

20 Board)’’ after ‘‘executive committee of the Board’’.

Æ
#### § 1271.41 Bank employees.

Upon the request of the Directorate of the Resolution Funding Corporation, established pursuant to section 21B(b) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441b(b)), officers, employees, or agents of the Banks are authorized to act for and on behalf of the Resolution Funding Corporation in such manner as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Resolution Funding Corporation as provided in section 21B(c)(6)(B) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441b(c)(6)(B)).
# C_2023193EN.01000401.xml

| 1.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 May 2023

(2023/C 193/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0683 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4480 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86405 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6278 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9724 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 12,0045 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,741 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 370,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5368 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9695 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 22,1320 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6497 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4582 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3696 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7793 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4467 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 21,1353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5926 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 030,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9307 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,053 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,134 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4288 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9263 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,3400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0683

JPY

Japanese yen

149,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4480

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86405

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6278

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9724

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

12,0045

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,741

HUF

Hungarian forint

370,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5368

RON

Romanian leu

4,9695

TRY

Turkish lira

22,1320

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6497

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4582

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3696

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7793

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4467

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,29

ZAR

South African rand

21,1353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5926

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 030,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9307

PHP

Philippine peso

60,053

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,134

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4288

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9263

INR

Indian rupee

88,3400

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2006297EN.01005001.xml

| 7.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/50

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 f of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises)

(2006/C 297/17)

| Aid No | Aid to small and medium-sized undertakings 1/2006 |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Hordaland, Western Norway |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Pilotprosjekt for å utløyse ei bioenerginæring i Hordaland.
  (Pilot project to stimulate establishing of a bioenergy sector in the Hordaland region). |
| Legal basis | Budget decision dated 12.10.2005, Hordaland County Council, (fylkestinget), letter from Hordaland County Council 17.1.2006 |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme | Annual overall amount:
  EUR 0,25 million in 2006 (NOK 2 million), EUR 0,125 in 2007 (NOK 1 million), EUR 0,125 million in 2008 (NOK 1 million) |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 16.3.2006 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | 31.12.2008 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises
  Investment aid and aid to consultancy and other services. |
| Economic sectors concerned | Limited to specific sectors: other manufacturing (Bioenergy) |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Osterfjord Næringssamarbeid |
| N-5282 Lonevåg |
| Large individual aid grants | In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation |

Aid No

Aid to small and medium-sized undertakings 1/2006

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Hordaland, Western Norway

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Pilotprosjekt for å utløyse ei bioenerginæring i Hordaland.

(Pilot project to stimulate establishing of a bioenergy sector in the Hordaland region).

Legal basis

Budget decision dated 12.10.2005, Hordaland County Council, (fylkestinget), letter from Hordaland County Council 17.1.2006

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme

Annual overall amount:

EUR 0,25 million in 2006 (NOK 2 million), EUR 0,125 in 2007 (NOK 1 million), EUR 0,125 million in 2008 (NOK 1 million)

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

16.3.2006

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

31.12.2008

Objective of aid

Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

Investment aid and aid to consultancy and other services.

Economic sectors concerned

Limited to specific sectors: other manufacturing (Bioenergy)

Name and address of the granting authority

Osterfjord Næringssamarbeid

N-5282 Lonevåg

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
§ 192.255 Form of proxy requirements. The form of proxy must include all of the following: ( a ) A statement in bold face type stating that management is soliciting the proxy.
( b ) Blank spaces where the member must date and sign the proxy.
( c ) Clear and impartial identification of each matter or group of related matters that members will vote upon. The savings association must include any proposed charitable contribution as an item to be voted on separately.
( d ) The phrase “Revocable Proxy” in bold face type (at least 18 point).
( e ) A description of any charter or State law requirement that restricts or conditions votes by proxy.
( f ) An acknowledgment that the member received a proxy statement before he or she signed the form of proxy.
( g ) The date, time, and the place of the meeting, when available.
( h ) A way for the member to specify by ballot whether he or she approves or disapproves of each matter that members will vote upon.
( i ) A statement that management will vote the proxy in accordance with the member's specifications.
( j ) A statement in bold face type indicating how management will vote the proxy if the member does not specify a choice for a matter.