alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1242.2 Definitions. Unless otherwise indicated, terms used in this part have the meanings that they have in 12 CFR part 1201 and in the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4501 *et seq.*). *Core business line* means a business line of the Enterprise that plausibly would continue to operate in a limited-life regulated entity, considering the purposes, mission, and authorized activities of the Enterprise as set forth in its authorizing statute and the Safety and Soundness Act. *Core business line* includes associated operations, services, functions, and supports necessary for any identified core business line to be continued, such as servicing, credit enhancement, securitization support, information technology support and operations, and human resources and personnel.
*Credible,* with regard to a resolution plan, means a resolution plan that: ( 1 ) Demonstrates consideration of required and prohibited assumptions set forth at § 1242.5(b);
( 2 ) Provides strategic analysis and detailed information as required by § 1242.5(c) through (g) that is well-founded and based on information and data related to the Enterprise that are observable or otherwise verifiable and employ reasonable projections from current and historical conditions within the broader financial markets; and
( 3 ) Plausibly achieves the purposes of § 1242.1(a).
*Material change* means an event, occurrence, change in conditions or circumstances, or other change that results in, or could reasonably be foreseen to have, a material effect on: ( 1 ) The resolvability of the Enterprise;
( 2 ) The Enterprise's resolution strategy; or
( 3 ) How the Enterprise's resolution plan is implemented. Material changes may include the identification of a new core business line or significant increases or decreases in business, operations, funding, or interconnections.
*Rapid and orderly resolution* means a process for establishing a limited-life regulated entity as successor to the Enterprise under section 1367 of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C 4617), including transferring Enterprise assets and liabilities to the limited-life regulated entity, such that succession by the limited-life regulated entity can be accomplished promptly and in a manner that substantially mitigates the risk that the failure of the Enterprise would have serious adverse effects on national housing finance markets.
# C_2021386EN.01000201.xml

| 23.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 September 2021

(2021/C 386/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1729 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1758 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0820 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1268 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,380 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,28 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6325 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9505 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,1523 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6178 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4997 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1333 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5855 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3368 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5850 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4935 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 694,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9174 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,995 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,3877 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,222 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1636 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5533 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,6220 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1729

JPY

Japanese yen

128,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86000

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1758

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0820

ISK

Iceland króna

152,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1268

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,380

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,28

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6325

RON

Romanian leu

4,9505

TRY

Turkish lira

10,1523

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6178

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4997

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1333

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6696

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5855

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,87

ZAR

South African rand

17,3368

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5850

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4935

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 694,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9174

PHP

Philippine peso

58,995

RUB

Russian rouble

85,3877

THB

Thai baht

39,222

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1636

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5533

INR

Indian rupee

86,6220

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
dated December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>                               
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000 
<CURRENCY>     U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               4,230
<SECURITIES>                                        66,458
<RECEIVABLES>                                      152,308 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,185
<INVENTORY>                                         64,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   299,788
<PP&E>                                              44,978         
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,650          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     341,821 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               71,085
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               216 
<OTHER-SE>                                         270,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       341,821
<SALES>                                          1,733,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,733,489
<CGS>                                            1,513,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,513,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   115,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 65,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        65,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         3.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         3.03
        

</TABLE>
# CI2021363EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 363/1

---

Corrigendum to the call for applications for the selection of the Controller of procedural guarantees in the context of investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 279 A of 13 July 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

On page 3, in point 4, under ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

| for: | ‘The closing date for registration is 9 September 2021. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 9 September 2021. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’,

| read: | ‘The closing date for registration is 23 September 2021. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 23 September 2021. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’.

---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Suriname

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Suriname			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Suriname 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Suriname

During the review period, the government made significant progress in four areas:  (1) publishing a budget that included major sources of revenue and expenditure; (2) ensuring actual revenues and expenditures reasonably correspond to those in the enacted budget; (3) ensuring budget documents were prepared according to internationally accepted principles; and (4) publishing an audit that covered the entire annual executed budget.  The government made its executive budget proposal and the enacted budget easily accessible to the public but did not make its end-of-year budget report publicly available.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available, including for the sole state-owned enterprise.  The government generally followed internationally accepted accounting principles, but it continued to treat loans as revenues.  The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to oversight.  The supreme audit institution generally met international standards of independence but lacked the authority and capacity to conduct and publish timely audits.  The government specified in law or regulation the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses but did not appear to follow these procedures in the mining sector specifically.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework.  There are no funds in it, however, and therefore its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals were not disclosed.

Suriname’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing an end-of-year budget report;
- Subjecting off-budget accounts to oversight; and
- Ensuring applicable laws and regulations for contracting and licensing in natural resource extraction are followed in practice;

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Suriname 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSuriname

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
42339.

#### TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. CAMPBELL et al.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In this ease the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation found that claimants, the mother and father of the deceased employee, were wholly dependent upon the employee at the time of his death, and rendered an award for them under *Code Ann.*§ 114-413 (b). On appeal the superior court affirmed the board’s award. The undisputed evidence showed that at the time of the employee’s death his father earned some income as a tenant farmer. The father testified: “Q. And from your share-cropping how much did you make? A. Well, I don’t know. Not too much •—I don’t know, maybe |100 a month.” There was also evidence that brothers of the deceased employee made occasional contributions to the claimants. *Held:*

Contributions to the claimants by the employee’s brothers, if insubstantial or sporadic, would not preclude a finding that claimants were wholly dependent upon the employee. *Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Williams,*80 Ga. App. 337 (1) (56 SE2d 157). However, a claimant is not “wholly dependent” within the meaning of *Code Ann.*§ 114-413 (b) where he earns a substantial part of his support or receives substantial contributions from other sources than the employee. *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Haygood,*81 Ga. App. 726 (59 SE2d 731). As the uncontradicted evidence revealed that the . claimants received an appreciable portion of their support from the father’s farming activities, the board was not authorized to find that claimants were wholly dependent upon the employee for their support. Appellants concede that a finding of partial dependency was demanded by the evidence.

Judgment reversed with direction that the case be remanded to the board in order that findings and an award be made, based on partial dependency under the formula provided in *Code Ann.*§ 114-413 (c).

*602Argued October 5, 1966

Decided November 2, 1966

Rehearing denied November 14, 1966

*Harris, Russell & Watkins, Philip R. Taylor, Joseph H. Chambless,*for appellants.

*Hicks & Hicks, H. T. Hicks, H. Arnold Hiers,*for appellees.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Jordan and Bberhardt, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CEM CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996<F1>    
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,899,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,320,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,059,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,547,000
<PP&E>                                       5,716,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,637,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,636,000
<BONDS>                                      1,504,000
<COMMON>                                       182,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,224,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,637,000
<SALES>                                     16,192,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,192,000
<CGS>                                        6,684,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,684,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,583,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   905,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,678,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,678,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<FN>
<F1>Certain information in the financial data schedule above has been condensed for
interim financial reporting pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1074.3 Implementation of the Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance.

The Statement describes the official policy of the Bureau with respect to the use of supervisory guidance in the supervisory process. The Statement is binding on the Bureau.
ATTORNEY FEES.

[Butler Circuit Court,

November Term, 1892.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### CELESTINE DERRINGER v. WM. H. PUGH ET AL.

Not Necessary to Plead Each Item Separately.

In a petition in an action to recover fees for attorney’s services, it is not necessary to make-a statement of each particular item of service rendered, and make a charge for each, item separately, where they refer to one transaction only.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

SMITH, J.

The errors complained of in this case are that the court of common pleas-overruled a motion of the defendant below to require the plaintiffs to make their petition more definite and certain, and overruled his motion for a new trial on the-ground that the finding of the court as to the amount due to plaintiffs was against the evidence. '

The petition alleged that there was due to the plaintiffs from -the defendant ■the sum of $285.00 for professional services, rendered by them as attorneys at law to him, -at his request, between January 1,1891, and January 17,1891, “in examining records and the law, giving an opinion, and furnishing an abstract of the defects in a -certain tax title and tax deed claimed and held by one H-ohaus to-the real estate of the defendant, and counselling and advising him in relation thereto.” And in substantially a similar manner it alleges services rendered in a. different case pending in court. The motion -was that the plaintiffs be required' ’ *707to malee their petition more definite and certain by itemizing the services alleged to have been performed, and by setting forth the charge made by each item thereof.

Cox & Cox, for plaintiff in error.

Pugh & Dustin, *contra.*

We think the court was not bound to grant this motion as made. The defendant was fully and sufficiently advised of the character and nature of the services alleged to have been performed. They were ^itemized therein. We do not think that the plaintiffs, in a case like this, are bound to make a statement of each particular item of services rendered, where they refer to one particular transaction, and state the charge for each item separately. We find no authority for such particularity. If the charges are for services in two or more wholly different matters, there would be propriety in requiring the value of services rendered in each to be stated separately, but not the value of each particular item of each transaction. In this case, however, the plaintiff in error cannot avail himself of this error, if there was one, for no exception was taken to the ruling of the court on the point.

Nor would we feel justified in holding that t'h^ judgment of the court as to the value of the services was against the weight of the evidence.

The judgment will be affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.08



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                HNC SOFTWARE INC.



        HNC Software Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "CORPORATION"), does
hereby certify that the following amendment to the Corporation's Restated
Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, with the
approval of such amendment by the corporation's stockholders.

        The first sentence of Article IV of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, relating to the Corporation's authorized shares of stock, is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:


                        The total number of shares of all classes of stock which
                the corporation has authority to issue is One Hundred
                Twenty-Four Million (124,000,000) shares, consisting of two
                classes: One Hundred Twenty Million (120,000,000) shares of
                Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, and Four Million
                (4,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per
                share.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 5th day of June,
2000.

                                          HNC SOFTWARE INC.


                                          By:  /s/ Kenneth J. Saunders
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Kenneth J. Saunders, Secretary



                                       43
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Point Blank Solutions, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the registration statement (No. 33-99032) on Form S-8 of Point Blank Solutions, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Point Blank Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Point Blank Solutions, Inc.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Rachlin LLP         
|                        
|Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|                        
|March 16, 2009
#### § 1274.3 Requirements to provide financial and other information to FHFA and the OF.

In order to facilitate the preparation by the OF of combined Bank System annual and quarterly reports, each Bank shall provide to the OF in such form and within such timeframes as FHFA or the OF shall specify, all financial and other information and assistance that the OF shall request for that purpose. Nothing in this section shall contravene or be deemed to circumscribe in any manner the authority of FHFA to obtain any information from any Bank related to the preparation or review of any financial report.