alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RFMC TACTICAL ADVISORS FUND, LP
  FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
 AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
 
 This FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, dated as of July 25, 2010 (this “Amendment”), to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of RFMC Tactical Advisors Fund, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), dated as of April 5, 1998, as amended by that First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of December 31, 2002, that Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of November 12, 2003, that Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of September 8, 2006 and that Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of March 10, 2010 (collectively, the “Agreement”), is made and entered by and between Ruvane Fund Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as the general partner of the Partnership the (“General Partner”), and the limited partners of the Partnership. The limited partners of the Partnership shall be referred to herein as “Limited Partners” with the General Partner and the Limited Partners hereinafter referred to as the “Partners”.
   WHEREAS, it is desired that the Agreement be amended to provide for the matters set forth herein;
  NOW, THEREFORE, the  Agreement is amended as follows:
 
 1.           Amendment.
  (a)           Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
  “The Partnership’s business and purpose is to trade, buy, sell or otherwise acquire, hold or dispose of commodity futures contracts, options on physical commodities and on commodity futures contracts, forward contracts ("Commodity and Futures Contracts"), and any rights pertaining thereto and to engage in all activities incident thereto.  The Partnership may also invest in entities (including other partnerships or funds) that trade Commodity and Futures Contracts.  The objective of the Partnership business is the appreciation of its assets through speculative trading.”
  2.           Effectiveness.
  This Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof.
  3.           Governing Law.
  The parties agree that this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
  4.           Amendment.
  On and after the date hereof, any reference in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” or words of like import, shall mean the Agreement as amended hereby.
   
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.
  General PartnerRUVANE FUND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBy:  /s/ Robert L. LernerRobert L. LernerPresident
§ 1320.10 Factors for consideration in designations. In making any proposed or final determination with respect to whether a financial market utility is, or is likely to become, systemically important under this part, the Council shall take into consideration: ( a ) The aggregate monetary value of transactions processed by the financial market utility, including without limitation— ( 1 ) The number of transactions processed, cleared or settled;
( 2 ) The value of transactions processed, cleared or settled; and
( 3 ) The value of other financial flows.
( b ) The aggregate exposure of the financial market utility to its counterparties, including without limitation— ( 1 ) Credit exposures, which includes but is not limited to potential future exposures; and
( 2 ) Liquidity exposures.
( c ) The relationship, interdependencies, or other interactions of the financial market utility with other financial market utilities or payment, clearing, or settlement activities, including without limitation interactions with different types of participants in those utilities or activities.
( d ) The effect that the failure of or a disruption to the financial market utility would have on critical markets, financial institutions, or the broader financial system, including without limitation— ( 1 ) Role of the financial market utility in the market served;
( 2 ) Availability of substitutes;
( 3 ) Concentration of participants;
( 4 ) Concentration by product type;
( 5 ) Degree of tiering; and
( 6 ) Potential impact or spillover in the event of a failure or disruption.
( e ) Any other factors that the Council deems appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 09-52; MB Docket No. 04-318; RM-11040]


Radio Broadcasting Service; Culebra and Vieques, PR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, Media Bureau, has issued a Memorandum 
Opinion and Order that denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
Western New Life, Inc. (``Petitioner''), permittee and operator by 
Special Temporary Authority (``STA'') of Station WJZG(FM), Channel 
293A, Culebra, Puerto Rico, directed against the Report and Order in MB 
Docket No. 04-318. The Memorandum Opinion and Order denies Petitioner's 
request to substitute Channel 291A for Channel 254A at Culebra, Puerto 
Rico, in an attempt to obtain a permanent authorization for Station 
WJZG(FM). It also denies Petitioner's request to accommodate the 
foregoing allotment by deleting vacant Channel 291B at Vieques, Puerto 
Rico. Petitioner's alternative proposal to substitute Channel 254A for 
Channel 291B at Vieques so that Station WJZG(FM) could obtain a 
permanent authorization on Channel 291A at Culebra is also denied.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MB Docket No. 04-318, adopted January 14, 
2009, and released January 16, 2009. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during regular 
business hours at the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 
445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 
12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-
378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will not send a copy 
of this Memorandum Opinion and Order in a report to be sent to Congress 
and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the petition for 
reconsideration was denied.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9-2395 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 1777.28 Appointment of conservator for a significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized Enterprise. ( a ) *Significantly undercapitalized Enterprise.* At any time after an Enterprise is classified as significantly undercapitalized, OFHEO may issue an order appointing a conservator for the Enterprise upon determining that: ( 1 ) The amount of core capital of the Enterprise is less than the minimum capital level; and
( 2 ) The alternative remedies available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act are not satisfactory.
( b ) *Critically undercapitalized Enterprise* — ( 1 ) *Appointment upon classification.* Not later than thirty days after issuing a final notice of capital classification pursuant to § 1777.21(a)(3) classifying an Enterprise as significantly undercapitalized, OFHEO shall issue an order appointing a conservator for the Enterprise.
( 2 ) *Exception.* Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, OFHEO may determine not to appoint a conservator if OFHEO makes a written finding, with the written concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury, that: ( i ) The appointment of a conservator would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions of national financial markets or on the financial stability of the housing finance market; and
( ii ) The public interest would be better served by taking some other enforcement action authorized under this title.
( c ) *Judicial review.* An Enterprise for which a conservator has been appointed pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may seek judicial review of the appointment in accordance with section 1369(b) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4619(b)). Except as provided therein, no court may take any action regarding the removal of a conservator or otherwise restrain or affect the exercise of the powers or functions of a conservator.
( d ) *Termination* — ( 1 ) *Upon reaching the minimum capital level.* OFHEO will issue an order terminating a conservatorship appointment under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section upon a determination that the Enterprise has maintained an amount of core capital that is equal to or exceeds the minimum capital level.
( 2 ) *In OFHEO's discretion.* OFHEO may, in its discretion, issue an order terminating a conservatorship appointment under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section upon a determination that such termination order is in the public interest and may safely be accomplished.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7270
CLARENCE JAY LYNCH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE M. MCMILLAN, Sheriff, Roanoke City, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-230-7) Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: January 9, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Emmette Pilgreen, IV, Harvey Sidney Lutins, LUTINS & PILGREEN, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Clarence Jay Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lynch has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 168.5 Protection of customer information.

Federal savings associations and their subsidiaries (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies, and investment advisers) must comply with the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Information Security Standards set forth in appendix B to part 30 of this chapter. Supplement A to appendix B to part 30 of this chapter provides interpretive guidance.

[76 FR 49129, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 54549, Sept. 11, 2014]
E.O. 12866 Review 2060-AQ43 Email 013111_4.txt

 

 

 From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 01/31/2011 06:09 PM 

 Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Concluded review of RIN 2060-AQ43 

Hi Sharon,

We have concluded review of RIN 2060-AQ43, Residual Risk and Technology

Review: Primary Lead Smelting.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

Page 1
# C_2023216EN.01000201.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/2

---

Appointment of the Registrar

(2023/C 216/02)

On 30 April 2023, Mr Emmanuel Coulon, Registrar of the General Court of the European Union, ceased to hold office. Mr Vittorio Di Bucci, appointed Registrar of the General Court of the European Union by decision of the General Court of 26 April 2023, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 254 TFEU and with Article 32 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, was sworn in on 5 June 2023 and took up his duties for a term of six years until 4 June 2029 inclusive.

---
§ 1230.4 Prior approval of termination agreements of Enterprises. ( a ) *In general.* An Enterprise may not enter into any agreement or contract to provide any payment of money or other thing of current or potential value in connection with the termination of employment of an executive officer unless the agreement or contract is approved in advance by the Director.
( b ) *Covered agreements or contracts.* An agreement or contract that provides for termination payments to an executive officer of an Enterprise that was entered into before October 28, 1992,[1] is not retroactively subject to approval or disapproval by the Director. However, any renegotiation, amendment, or change to such an agreement or contract shall be considered as entering into an agreement or contract that is subject to approval by the Director.
( c ) *Factors to be taken into account.* In making the determination whether to approve or disapprove termination benefits, the Director may consider: ( 1 ) Whether the benefits provided under the agreement or contract are comparable to benefits provided under such agreements or contracts for officers of other public or private entities involved in financial services and housing interests who have comparable duties and responsibilities;
( 2 ) The factors set forth in § 1230.3(b); and
( 3 ) Such other information as deemed appropriate by the Director.
( d ) *Exception to prior approval.* An employment agreement or contract subject to prior approval of the Director under this section may be entered into prior to that approval, provided that such agreement or contract specifically provides notice that termination benefits under the agreement or contract shall not be effective and no payments shall be made under such agreement or contract unless and until approved by the Director. Such notice should make clear that alteration of benefit plans subsequent to FHFA approval under this section, which affect final termination benefits of an executive officer, requires review at the time of the individual's termination from the Enterprise and prior to the payment of any benefits.
( e ) *Effect of prior approval of an agreement or contract.* The Director's approval of an executive officer's termination of employment benefits shall not preclude the Director from making any subsequent determination under this section to prohibit and withhold executive compensation.
( f ) *Form of approval.* The Director's approval pursuant to this section may occur in such form and manner as the Director shall provide through written notice to the regulated entities or the Office of Finance.
Footnotes -
1230.4
[1] This date refers to the date of enactment of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992.
#### § 20.1106 Rule 1106. Claim for death benefits by survivor—prior unfavorable decisions during veteran's lifetime.

Except with respect to benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1311(a)(2) and 1318, and certain cases involving individuals whose Department of Veterans Affairs benefits have been forfeited for treason or for subversive activities under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 6104 and 6105, issues involved in a survivor's claim for death benefits will be decided without regard to any prior disposition of those issues during the veteran's lifetime. Cases in which a person substitutes for a deceased veteran under 38 U.S.C. 5121A are not claims for death benefits and are not subject to this section. Cases in which a person substitutes for a deceased death benefits claimant under 38 U.S.C. 5121A are claims for death benefits subject to this section.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5121A, 7104(b)).

[79 FR 52984, Sept. 5, 2014]
#### Maurice S. Keller, Respondent, *v.*George Simm et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

Blumenthal, Moss & Eeiner, for appellants.

J. Goode, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The action is not one in equity,' and the Municipal Court had jurisdiction to entertain it. Upon the evidence we are not disposed to interfere with the finding of the justice that there was a written memorandum of lease. The defendants failed to show either eviction or acceptance of a surrender of the premises, or an agreement to release one of the defendants and look to the other.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 169.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Security holder.* ( 1 ) The term *security holder* means any person having the right to vote in the affairs of a savings association by virtue of: ( i ) Ownership of any security of the association or
( ii ) Any indebtedness to the association.
( 2 ) For purposes of this part, the term *security holder* shall include any account holder having the right to vote in the affairs of a mutual savings association.
( b ) *Person.* The term *person* includes, in addition to natural persons, corporations, partnerships, pension funds, profit-sharing funds, trusts, and any other group of associated persons of whatever nature.
( c ) *Proxy.* The term *proxy* includes every form of authorization by which a person is, or may be deemed to be, designated to act for the security holder in the exercise of his or her voting rights in the affairs of a savings association. Such an authorization may take the form of failure to dissent or object.
( d ) *Solicit; solicitation.* ( 1 ) The terms *solicit* and *solicitation* refer to: ( i ) Any request for a proxy whether or not accompanied by or included in a form of proxy;
( ii ) Any request to execute, not execute, or revoke a proxy; or
( iii ) The furnishing of a form of proxy or other communication to security holders under circumstances reasonably calculated to result in the procurement, withholding, or revocation of a proxy.
( 2 ) The terms do not apply, however, to the furnishing of a form of proxy to a security holder upon the request of such security holder or to the performance by any person of ministerial acts on behalf of a person soliciting a proxy.
§ 19.110 Scope and definitions. ( a ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to informal hearings afforded to any institution-affiliated party who has been suspended or removed from office or prohibited from further participation in the affairs of any depository institution pursuant to section 8(g) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(g)) by a notice or order issued by the Comptroller.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this subpart— ( 1 ) The term *petitioner* means an individual who has filed a petition for an informal hearing under this subpart.
( 2 ) The term *depository institution* means any national bank, Federal savings association, or Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank.
( 3 ) The term *OCC Supervisory Office* means the Senior Deputy Comptroller or Deputy Comptroller of the OCC department or office responsible for supervision of the depository institution or, in the case of an individual no longer affiliated with a particular depository institution, the Deputy Comptroller for Special Supervision.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              LOMAK PETROLEUM, INC.
                            1997 STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

I, Rodney L. Waller, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Range Resources
Corporation, formerly Lomak Petroleum, Inc., (the "Company") and that, as such,
I am authorized to execute this amendment on behalf of the Company, and, DO
HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT the following resolution was duly approved and
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on September 28, 1999:

         RESOLVED, that the Lomak Petroleum, Inc. 1997 Stock Purchase Plan (the
         "Plan"), as previously amended, be further amended as follows,
         effective September 28, 1999:

                  The Plan shall be renamed the "Range Resources Corporation
                  1997 Stock Purchase Plan" and all references to the name of
                  the Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Plan as renamed
                  herein.

September 28, 1999

                                              /s/ Rodney L. Waller
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                    Rodney L. Waller
                                                    Corporate Secretary


                                       8
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000794154
<NAME>                        SEPRAGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                   83,254
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           489,577
<ALLOWANCES>                            (40,000)
<INVENTORY>                             314,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        865,808
<PP&E>                                  785,531
<DEPRECIATION>                         (689,029)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          962,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   504,092
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                             500,000
<COMMON>                             16,852,499
<OTHER-SE>                          (16,894,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            962,310
<SALES>                               1,034,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,034,209
<CGS>                                   598,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           598,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,602,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (13,375)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,180,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,180,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,180,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Thomas Michaelides 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Bernard Young 

SUPREME Cougr 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A