alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 2

- 00 569

- C V



### ____________________

IN THE ESTATE OF DONNA FELLS

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 86 109

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

After submission of the appeal, it came to the attention of the Court that the

judgment may not have finally adjudicated all claims between the parties. The

parties agreed that the case should be returned to the trial court so that the trial

court may clarify the judgment.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. All appellate timetables are

suspended while the trial court retains jurisdiction over the case. A supplemental

record shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by September 3, 2013. The appeal2 will be reinstated without further order of this Court when the supplemental clerk’s

record is filed.

ORDER ENTERED August 1 , 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
#### § 163.171 [Reserved]
§ 1610.2 General definitions. *Council* means the Financial Stability Oversight Council.
*Legal Entity Identifier* or LEI for an entity means the global legal entity identifier maintained for such entity by a utility accredited by the Global LEI Foundation or by a utility endorsed by the Regulatory Oversight Committee that satisfies the standards implemented by the Global LEI Foundation. As used in this definition: ( 1 ) Regulatory Oversight Committee means the Regulatory Oversight Committee (of the Global LEI System), whose charter was set forth by the Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors of the Group of Twenty and the Financial Stability Board, or any successor thereof; and
( 2 ) Global LEI Foundation means the not-for-profit organization organized under Swiss law by the Financial Stability Board in 2014, or any successor thereof.
*Office* means the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Financial Research.
§ 205.5 Issuance of access devices. ( a ) *Solicited issuance.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a financial institution may issue an access device to a consumer only: ( 1 ) In response to an oral or written request for the device; or
( 2 ) As a renewal of, or in substitution for, an accepted access device whether issued by the institution or a successor.
( b ) *Unsolicited issuance.* A financial institution may distribute an access device to a consumer on an unsolicited basis if the access device is: ( 1 ) Not validated, meaning that the institution has not yet performed all the procedures that would enable a consumer to initiate an electronic fund transfer using the access device;
( 2 ) Accompanied by a clear explanation that the access device is not validated and how the consumer may dispose of it if validation is not desired;
( 3 ) Accompanied by the disclosures required by § 205.7, of the consumer's rights and liabilities that will apply if the access device is validated; and
( 4 ) Validated only in response to the consumer's oral or written request for validation, after the institution has verified the consumer's identity by a reasonable means.
# C_2022414EN.01003901.xml

| 28.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/39

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 October 2022

(2022/C 414/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0037 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4387 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9583 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9949 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3420 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,530 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 412,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7585 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8893 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,6810 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5610 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3672 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,8782 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7316 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4154 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 428,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1521 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2552 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 629,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7324 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,441 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,975 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3889 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0150 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,6560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0037

JPY

Japanese yen

147,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4387

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86745

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9583

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9949

ISK

Iceland króna

143,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3420

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,530

HUF

Hungarian forint

412,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7585

RON

Romanian leu

4,8893

TRY

Turkish lira

18,6810

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5610

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3672

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,8782

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7316

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4154

KRW

South Korean won

1 428,57

ZAR

South African rand

18,1521

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2552

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 629,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7324

PHP

Philippine peso

58,441

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,975

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3889

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0150

INR

Indian rupee

82,6560

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 21.5838 Overpayments. ( a ) *Educational assistance.* If an individual receives educational assistance but the educational assistance must be discontinued according to § 21.5835, the amount of educational assistance attributable to the portion of the term, quarter or semester following the effective date of discontinuance shall constitute a debt due the United States. ( 1 ) The amount of the debt is equal to the product of— ( i ) The number of days the individual was entitled to receive subsistence allowance during the enrollment period for which educational assistance was paid, divided by the total number of days in that enrollment period, and
( ii ) The amount of educational assistance provided for that enrollment period.
( 2 ) Nothing in this method of calculation shall change the fact that the number of months of educational assistance to which the individual remains entitled shall always be the same as the number of months of subsistence allowance to which the individual is entitled. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2143)
( b ) *Subsistence allowance.* If an individual receives subsistence allowance under any of the following conditions, the amount of that subsistence allowance shall constitute a debt due the United States unless the debt is waived as provided by §§ 1.955 through 1.970 of this chapter. ( 1 ) Subsistence allowance received for courses pursued while on active duty;
( 2 ) Subsistence allowance received for courses which are precluded under § 21.5800(b);
( 3 ) Subsistence allowance received by a person who is not eligible for educational assistance under § 21.5740;
( 4 ) Subsistence allowance received by an individual who has exhausted all entitlement provided under § 21.5742;
( 5 ) Subsistence allowance received by an individual for a period before the commencing date determined by § 21.5831.
( 6 ) Subsistence allowance received by an individual for a period following a discontinuance date determined by § 21.5835.
( 7 ) Subsistence allowance received by an individual in excess of the part-time rate for a period following a reduction date determined by § 21.5835.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2144)
# C_2007301EN.01002001.xml

| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/20

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Stavanger tingrett dated 25 May 2007 in the case of Seabrokers AS v Den Norske Stat v/Skattedirektoratet

(Case E-7/07)

(2007/C 301/12)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 25 May 2007 from Stavanger tingrett (Stavanger District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 30 May 2007, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Seabrokers AS v Den Norske Stat v/Skattedirektoratet, on the following questions:

| 1. | Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, debt interest to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, debt interest to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance?

Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, debt interest to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance?

| 2. | Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, group contributions to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, group contributions to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance?

Is it contrary to Article 4, 31 or 40 of the EEA Agreement to attribute, according to the principle of net income taxation, group contributions to the income abroad when calculating the maximum credit allowance?

| 3. | Will the answer to question 1 and/or 2 be the same if the debt interest and/or the group contributions can only be linked to the business in Norway? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Will the answer to question 1 and/or 2 be the same if the debt interest and/or the group contributions can only be linked to the business in Norway?

Will the answer to question 1 and/or 2 be the same if the debt interest and/or the group contributions can only be linked to the business in Norway?

---
429 A.2d 40

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Terrance DAVIS, Appellant. 

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Nov. 11, 1980.

Filed July 10, 1981.

Reargument Denied August 3, 1981.

Ivan S. Abrams, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Robert L. Eberhardt, Deputy District Attorney, Pittsburgh, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, WICKERSHAM and LIPEZ, JJ.

*480PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claims that the court below erred 1) in refusing to sever counts 14, 15 and 16 from counts 23 and 24 and from counts 19, 20, 21 and 22, trial on all of which was on the same day; and 2) in refusing to sever counts 4 and 5 from counts 6 and 7, which four counts were tied together in another single proceeding, were not raised below in written post-verdict motions and, therefore, are not preserved for appellate review. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(a); *Commonwealth v. Blair,*460 Pa. 31, 33 n. 1, 331 A.2d 213, 215 n. 1 (1975). The opinion of the court below adequately disposes of appellant’s remaining contentions.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed on the able (and extremely well organized) opinion of Judge Lewis of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County.

SPAETH and WICKERSHAM, JJ., concur in the result.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 11

                                 CEM CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
             For the three months ended September 30, 1997 and 1996


(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          1997           1996
                                                                               `         ------         ------

<S>                                                                                      <C>            <C>   
Net income                                                                               $  241         $  106
                                                                                         ======         ======

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                             3,486          3,540

    Number of shares purchasable upon exercise of options, reduced by the number
      of shares which could have been purchased with proceeds from
      exercise of such options at average market price                                       18             69
                                                                                         ------         ------

    Weighted average number of shares outstanding, as adjusted                            3,504          3,609
                                                                                         ======         ======

Primary earnings per share                                                               $  .07         $  .03
                                                                                         ======         ======



Net income                                                                               $  241         $  106
                                                                                         ======         ======

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                             3,486          3,540

    Number of shares purchasable upon exercise of options, reduced by the number
      of shares which could have been purchased with proceeds from exercise of
      such options at the greater of period-end market price
      or average market price                                                                43             69
                                                                                         ------         ------

    Weighted average number of shares outstanding, as adjusted                            3,529          3,609
                                                                                         ======         ======

Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution                                        $  .07         $  .03
                                                                                         ======         ======
</TABLE>




                                  Page 12 of 12
SERVED: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF PRO FORM PRODUCTS LTD. DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-1122 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2012S0700264) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

.
.

Attachment

- Service List ··., **----** ....,
.// fl-../,/ eA. Yoder /SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001

President Pro FormProducts Ltd., Respondent 604 McGeachie Drive Milton, Ontario Canada L9T3Y5 ONE COPY

Stuart A. Laven, Jr., Respondent's Counsel Cavitch, Familo & Durkin Twentieth Floor 1300 EastNinth Street Cleveland, OH 44114 TEL: 216-621-7860 FAX: 216-621-3415 Robert B. Dixon, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1122 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Source: BLM 2007 

F i s h 

C

Nuiqsut

r e e k 

K

K o g u s u k r

i

u

k i a k r

k 

k 

o r a

A R C T I C O C E A N 

J u d y

Cr e e k 

Miguakiak R. 

H a r r i

n 

Umiat

13 

12 11 10

12 11 10

12 11 10

3 2 1 W 7 6 5 4

1 W 1 E 

8 

2 2 

9 

3 

3 4

5 4

5 

1 N 

1 E 

6 

2 2 

7 

3 3 

8 

4 

4 

9 

9 8 7 6 5

12 

11 

14 

10 

15 N 

13 

8 

4 

1 S 

0 6 12

Miles 

5 

7 

3 

VISUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2 

6 

2 

3 

9 N 

5 

1 W 

4 

C o l v i l l e 

Ikpikp

uk 

Rive

Atigaru Point 

B

r 

R i v

e

r 

R i

e v

r 

R i v e r 

Cape Halkett 

s o

a y 

Pitt Point 

Cape Simpson 

Sm i t h B a y 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

T e s h e k p u k L a k e 

Sensitivity Levels 

High

Moderate 

Low 

Map 3-46. Visual Resource Management Sensitivity Levels in the Northeast National Petroleum Reserve ­

Alaska
§ 1075.108 Distributing payments to victims. ( a ) *Designation of a payments administrator.* Upon allocating Civil Penalty Fund funds to a class of victims pursuant to § 1075.106, the Fund Administrator will designate a payments administrator who will be responsible for distributing payments to the victims in that class. A payments administrator may be any person, including a Bureau employee or contractor.
( b ) *Distribution plan.* The payments administrator must submit to the Fund Administrator a proposed plan for the distribution of funds allocated to a class of victims. The Fund Administrator will approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed distribution plan. If the Fund Administrator disapproves a proposed plan, the payments administrator must submit a new proposed plan.
( c ) *Contents of plan.* The Fund Administrator will instruct the payments administrator to prepare a distribution plan and may require that plan to include: ( 1 ) Procedures for determining the amount each victim will receive. Such procedures may, but need not, include a process for submitting and approving claims.
( 2 ) Procedures for locating and notifying victims eligible or potentially eligible for payment.
( 3 ) The method or methods by which the payments will be made.
( 4 ) The method or methods by which potentially eligible victims may contact the payments administrator.
( 5 ) Any other provisions that the Fund Administrator deems appropriate.
( d ) *Distribution of payments.* The payments administrator will make payments to victims in a class, except to the extent such payments are impracticable, in accordance with the distribution plan approved under paragraph (b) of this section and subject to the Fund Administrator's supervision.
( e ) *Disposition of funds remaining after attempted distribution to a class of victims.* If funds allocated to a class of victims remain after a payments administrator distributes payments to that class, the payments administrator will distribute those remaining funds as follows: ( 1 ) To the extent practicable, the payments administrator will distribute those remaining funds to victims in that class up to the amount of their remaining uncompensated harm as described in § 1075.104(b).
( 2 ) Any remaining funds that cannot be distributed pursuant to paragraph (e)(1) of this section will be returned to the Civil Penalty Fund.
#### § 1402.25 Interest.

The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation may begin charging interest on unpaid fees, starting on the 31st day following the day on which the bill for such fees was sent. Interest will not accrue if payment of the fees has been received by the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, even if said payment has not been processed. Interest will accrue at the rate prescribed in section 3717 of title 31, United States Code, and will accrue from the day on which the bill for such fees was sent.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30443 Conference Calendar

CRAIG A. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT; HARRY CONNICK; WILLARD HILL, JR.; TYRONE VAIL; JOSEPH WILLIAMS; DONALD POKE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-231-L

-------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Craig Singleton appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Singleton’s attempt to incorporate by reference his district court habeas corpus petition is insufficient to preserve error. See Perillo v. Johnson , 79 F.3d 441, 443 n.1 (5th Cir. 1996). Singleton has not filed an appellate brief containing legal argument explaining why the district court’s decision was error. He has therefore waivedNo. 01-30443 -2- that issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.