alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant                           ( print page 51868)                        applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Biology Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         November 2, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Courtyard Gaithersburg Washingtonian Ctr., 204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter Zelazowski, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-6902,                         *Peter.Zelazowski@Nih.Gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24227 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Sanctioning Fentanyl Network Run by Sinaloa Cartel Family Members

# 									Sanctioning Fentanyl Network Run by Sinaloa Cartel Family Members							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 12, 2023

Last week, 85 countries and 13 international organizations convened virtually to launch a Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drug Threats.  Today, in another step to combat the illicit manufacture and trafficking of fentanyl and other synthetic drugs, the Department of the Treasury sanctioned one Mexico-based company and 10 Mexican nationals including several Sinaloa Cartel members and fugitives, who are responsible for a significant portion of the illicit fentanyl and other deadly drugs trafficked into the United States.  The company regularly receives chemical shipments from exporters in the People’s Republic of China.  This action was coordinated closely with the Government of Mexico and targets entities and individuals from one of the most pervasive drug trafficking organizations in the world.

The United States continues to take steps to combat the illicit fentanyl epidemic, including by providing support to more than 20 million Americans in recovery, partnering with law enforcement around the world to disrupt and dismantle transnational criminal organizations, and offering over 30 rewards –totaling over $75 million– for information to help bring fentanyl traffickers to justice, through the Narcotics and Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Programs.

This Administration remains committed to disrupting the illicit synthetic drugs supply chain, from chemical diversion to production to smuggling to distribution.  We are steadfast in our resolve to address this public health crisis and to seek accountability for those who perpetuate it.

*The individuals and entity sanctioned by the Department of the Treasury, pursuant to Executive Order 14059, were involved in drug trafficking and transportation, precursor chemical sales, overseeing illicit drug laboratories, cross-border tunnels, and enforcement operations for Los Chapitos.**In April 2023, the Department of State issued reward offers for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of three of today’s sanctioned individuals:**Oscar Noe Medina Gonzalez (up to $4 million), Nestor Isidro Perez Salas (up to $3 million), and Noel Lopez Perez (up to $1 million).*

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDrug TraffickingMexicoOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1904

COREY LEVON BECKHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00161-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Levon Beckham, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Corey Levon Beckham seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on 

Beckham’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) 

motion to alter or amend judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Beckham has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of CITY CAPITAL CORPORATION (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ephren
W. Taylor II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: November 19, 2007

/S/ EPHREN W. TAYLOR II
--------------------------------------
    EPHREN W. TAYLOR II, CHAIRMAN
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
#### § 1808.609 Representations and warranties of Secondary Borrower.

Each Secondary Borrower shall make identical representations and warranties as the Eligible CDFI and shall make specific representations and warranties with respect to the collateral and the project that is proposed to be financed by the Secondary Loan, upon which the Eligible CDFI, the Qualified Issuer, the Bondholder, the Guarantor, and the CDFI Fund may rely. These representation and warranties shall be to the satisfaction of the Guarantor and the CDFI Fund.
#### § 1270.20 Consolidated obligations are not obligations of the United States or guaranteed by the United States.

Consolidated obligations are not obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by the United States.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 1, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41682

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO ALTATO-PUES, also known as Lucho 

Gatica-Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-1770-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Altato-Pues (Altato) appeals the sentence imposed

upon his guilty-plea conviction for transporting illegal aliens

via motor vehicle into the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324. 

Altato argues that under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), the district court was not authorized to increase his

sentence based on its factual finding that he recklessly

endangered the lives of his alien passengers. Both the
No. 04-41682

-2-

Government and Altato contest whether Altato admitted the facts

supporting the reckless endangerment adjustment. However,

neither party provided this court with a transcript of the

rearraignment proceeding. Absent the transcript, this court

cannot review this claim. See e.g., United States v. Holmes, 406

F.3d 337, 366 & n.49 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 375

(2005). 

The district court, however, committed “Fanfan” error by

sentencing Altato pursuant to a mandatory guidelines scheme. See

United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). 

The Government concedes that Altato preserved his Fanfan claim. 

As such, this court reviews the claim for harmless error. See

Walters, 418 F.3d at 464. This court has rejected the argument

that a Fanfan error is structural. See Walters, 418 F.3d at 463. 

There is no indication in the record that the district court

would have imposed the same sentence had the guidelines been

advisory rather than mandatory. The Government has not satisfied

its burden of showing that the district court’s Fanfan error was

harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See Walters, 418 F.3d at

463-64. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for

resentencing in accordance with Booker. 

This court need not address at this time Altato’s remaining

argument challenging the district court’s denial of his request

for a downward departure. See United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d

360, 377 n.62 (5th Cir. 2005). 
No. 04-41682

-3-

SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 12(b)
 (1)
  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,(dollars in thousands)
    

2004
    
    

2005
    
    

2006
    
    

2007
    
    

2008
    

2009Net  income (loss)
    
    $
    24,219
    
    
    $
    47,470
    
    
    $
    43,279
    
    
    $
    45,551
    

    $
    10,360


    (55,823
)Income tax expense (benefit)
    
    
    11,764
    
    
    
    35,488
    
    
    
    34,520
    
    
    
    37,283
    

    
    14,487


    (36,146
)Fixed charges
    
    
    116,409
    
    
    
    137,889
    
    
    
    171,686
    
    
    
    224,932
    

    
    230,078


    263,011Earnings
    
    
    152,392
    
    
    
    220,847
    
    
    
    249,485
    
    
    
    307,766
    

    
    254,925


    171,042Interest expense, net
    
    
    64,425
    
    
    
    80,345
    
    
    
    109,806
    
    
    
    158,609
    

    
    156,716


    191,455Rent under leases representative
of an interest factor
    
    
    51,984
    
    
    
    57,544
    
    
    
    61,880
    
    
    
    66,323
    

    
    73,362


    71,556Preferred dividends
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    

    
    0


    0Fixed charges
    
    
    116,409
    
    
    
    137,889
    
    
    
    171,686
    
    
    
    224,932
    

    
    230,078


    263,011Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(2)
    
    
    1.3x
    
    
    
    1.6x
    
    
    
    1.5x
    
    
    
    1.4x
    

    
    1.1x


    0.7x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earnings
divided by fixed charges. For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as net
income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges is defined as the sum of
interest expenses, preferred stock dividends and the component of rental expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts.(2)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2009, earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges by $92.0 million.
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Thomas Michaelides Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Bernard Young

SUPREME Cougr

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
# C_2021489EN.01000201.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 489/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 489/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 December 2021

(2021/C 489/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1291 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85048 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0387 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2875 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,415 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 363,86 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5923 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,6131 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5999 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4471 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8006 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6634 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5466 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 334,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9509 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1935 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5273 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 288,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7772 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,048 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,0225 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,254 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3687 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,9841 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8455 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1291

JPY

Japanese yen

127,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85048

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0387

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2875

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,415

HUF

Hungarian forint

363,86

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5923

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

15,6131

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5999

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4471

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8006

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6634

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5466

KRW

South Korean won

1 334,04

ZAR

South African rand

17,9509

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1935

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5273

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 288,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7772

PHP

Philippine peso

57,048

RUB

Russian rouble

83,0225

THB

Thai baht

38,254

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3687

MXN

Mexican peso

23,9841

INR

Indian rupee

84,8455

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1808.607 Representations and warranties of Qualified Issuer with respect to Guarantee. The Qualified Issuer shall represent and warrant to the Guarantor, at the execution of any Agreement to Guarantee to which it is a party and thereafter at the closing of any Bond Loan and the issuance of any Bond, the following: ( a ) The Qualified Issuer is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing in its State of organization with the power and authority to enter into the agreements and consummate the transactions thereby contemplated;
( b ) The information contained in the Qualified Issuer Application is true and correct;
( c ) The Bonds, when executed, are and will be duly authorized, executed, valid, binding and enforceable obligations of the Qualified Issuer;
( d ) Except as disclosed to the Guarantor, no claim or litigation is pending or threatened which would materially adversely affect the Qualified Issuer's ability to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Agreement to Guarantee, the Bond, or the Bond Loan;
( e ) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement to Guarantee, the Bond, and the Bond Loan will not conflict with or constitute an event of default under any law or agreement to which the Qualified Issuer is subject;
( f ) No authorization, approval or consent of a governmental authority is necessary on the part of the Qualified Issuer to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Bond or the Bond Loan which has not been obtained;
( g ) No funds from any other CDFI Fund program are being used to pay principal, interest, fees, administrative costs, or issuance costs (including Bond Issuance Fees) related to the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program, or to fund the Risk-Share Pool; and
( h ) Any other representation or warranty deemed appropriate by the Guarantor, the CDFI Fund or the Bond Purchaser.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   409,928
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              7,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         420,919
<PP&E>                                                 5,737,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,669,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,723,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    180,518
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,542,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,723,171
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         431,450
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            289,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          142,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      142,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             142,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest's Tri-County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Friday, October 15, 2009, from 5 p.m. until 8 p.m., in Deer Lodge, Montana. The purpose of the meeting is to review funding proposals for Title II funding.

# DATES:

Friday, October 15, 2009, from 5 p.m. until 8 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USDA building located 1002 Hollenback Road, Deer Lodge, Montana (MT 59722).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Patty Bates, Committee Coordinator, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 420 Barrett Road, Dillon, MT 59725 (406) 683-3979; E-MAIL                         *pbates@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda for this meeting include discussion about accomplishments, monitoring, priorities and funding for new project proposals. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: September 28, 2009.

David R. Myers,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. E9-24028 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M8