alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Davidson Growth Plus, L.P. 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000795757
<NAME> DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                             732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,355   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,297   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,941     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,591    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,297    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,284    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,211    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 263    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        61     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT VARIABLES

                                             between

                                       THE BOEING COMPANY

                                               and

                                    American Trans Air, Inc.


                   Supplemental Exhibit BFE1 to Purchase Agreement Number 2285




<PAGE>



                               BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT VARIABLES

                                           relating to

                                  BOEING MODEL 757-33N AIRCRAFT


This  Supplemental  Exhibit BFE1 contains vendor selection dates,  on-dock dates
and other variables applicable to the Aircraft.

1.       SUPPLIER SELECTION.
         ------------------

         Customer will:

     1.1 Select  and  notify  Boeing of the  suppliers  and part  numbers of the
following BFE items by the following dates:



Galley System                                            JULY 24, 2000


Galley Inserts                                           JULY 24, 2000


Seats (passenger)                                             COMPLETE


Overhead & Audio System                                       COMPLETE


Miscellaneous Emergency Equipment                        JULY 24, 2000


Cargo Handling Systems*                                       COMPLETE


* For a previously certified system



<PAGE>


2.       ON-DOCK DATES

 On or before October,  2000, Boeing will provide to Customer a BFE Requirements
On-Dock/Inventory  Document (BFE Document) or an electronically  transmitted BFE
Report which may be periodically revised,  setting forth the items,  quantities,
on-dock dates and shipping instructions relating to the in-sequence installation
of BFE. For planning  purposes,  a preliminary BFE on-dock schedule is set forth
below:

                            PRELIMINARY ON-DOCK DATES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                AIRCRAFT DELIVERY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                        (CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                AIRCRAFT DELIVERY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                        (CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED)

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7674

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERMAN LEE TATE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-98-125-9-V)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Lee Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Steven Cromwell, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Herman Lee Tate appeals the district court’s order denying his

petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Tate, No. CR-98-125-9-

V (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 25, 2002; entered Oct. 2, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Kirby L. Cramer, in my individual
capacity and as Director of Unilab Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard A. Michaelson
and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone, from the date
hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in writing, to act
as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and on my behalf to
execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend and/or modify
and deliver one or more registration statements for the filing of securities of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")
and any and all subsequent filings made by or on behalf of the Company with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act
and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of October 1994.

                                          /s/ Kirby L. Cramer
                                          -------------------

                                          Kirby L. Cramer
§ 192.390 Community offering of conversion shares. ( a ) *Purchase preference in subscription offering.* In a subscription offering, a savings association may give a purchase preference to eligible account holders, supplemental eligible account holders, and voting members residing in its local community.
( b ) *Purchase preference in community offering.* In a community offering, a savings association must give a purchase preference to natural persons residing in its local community.
**City Capital Corporation.**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of City Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ephren Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 16, 2009

By: /s/  Ephren W. Taylor II    

                    Ephren W. Taylor II,

Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal executive, financial and accounting officer)
§ 235.4 Fraud-prevention adjustment. ( a ) *In general.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an issuer may receive or charge an amount of no more than 1 cent per transaction in addition to any interchange transaction fee it receives or charges in accordance with § 235.3.
( b ) *Issuer standards.* ( 1 ) To be eligible to receive or charge the fraud-prevention adjustment in paragraph (a) of this section, an issuer must develop and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to take effective steps to reduce the occurrence of, and costs to all parties from, fraudulent electronic debit transactions, including through the development and implementation of cost-effective fraud-prevention technology.
( 2 ) An issuer's policies and procedures must address— ( i ) Methods to identify and prevent fraudulent electronic debit transactions;
( ii ) Monitoring of the volume and value of its fraudulent electronic debit transactions;
( iii ) Appropriate responses to suspicious electronic debit transactions in a manner designed to limit the costs to all parties from and prevent the occurrence of future fraudulent electronic debit transactions;
( iv ) Methods to secure debit card and cardholder data; and
( v ) Such other factors as the issuer considers appropriate.
( 3 ) An issuer must review, at least annually, its fraud-prevention policies and procedures, and their implementation and update them as necessary in light of— ( i ) Their effectiveness in reducing the occurrence of, and cost to all parties from, fraudulent electronic debit transactions involving the issuer;
( ii ) Their cost-effectiveness; and
( iii ) Changes in the types of fraud, methods used to commit fraud, and available methods for detecting and preventing fraudulent electronic debit transactions that the issuer identifies from— ( A ) Its own experience or information;
( B ) Information provided to the issuer by its payment card networks, law enforcement agencies, and fraud-monitoring groups in which the issuer participates; and
( C ) Applicable supervisory guidance.
( c ) *Notification.* To be eligible to receive or charge a fraud-prevention adjustment, an issuer must annually notify its payment card networks that it complies with the standards in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Change in status.* An issuer is not eligible to receive or charge a fraud-prevention adjustment if the issuer is substantially non-compliant with the standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, as determined by the issuer or the appropriate agency under § 235.9. Such an issuer must notify its payment card networks that it is no longer eligible to receive or charge a fraud-prevention adjustment no later than 10 days after determining or receiving notification from the appropriate agency under § 235.9 that the issuer is substantially non-compliant with the standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. The issuer must stop receiving and charging the fraud-prevention adjustment no later than 30 days after notifying its payment card networks.
[77 FR 46280, Aug. 3, 2012]
§ 229.52 Substitute check warranties. ( a ) *Content and provision of substitute-check warranties.* ( 1 ) A bank that transfers, presents, or returns a substitute check (or a paper or electronic representation of a substitute check) for which it receives consideration warrants to the parties listed in paragraph (b) of this section that— ( i ) The substitute check meets the requirements for legal equivalence described in § 229.51(a)(1) and (2); and
( ii ) No depositary bank, drawee, drawer, or indorser will receive presentment or return of, or otherwise be charged for, the substitute check, the original check, or a paper or electronic representation of the substitute check or original check such that that person will be asked to make a payment based on a check that it already has paid.
( 2 ) A bank that rejects a check submitted for deposit and returns to its customer a substitute check (or a paper or electronic representation of a substitute check) makes the warranties in paragraph (a)(1) of this section regardless of whether the bank received consideration.
( b ) *Warranty recipients.* A bank makes the warranties described in paragraph (a) of this section to the person to which the bank transfers, presents, or returns the substitute check or a paper or electronic representation of such substitute check and to any subsequent recipient, which could include a collecting or returning bank, the depositary bank, the drawer, the drawee, the payee, the depositor, and any indorser. These parties receive the warranties regardless of whether they received the substitute check or a paper or electronic representation of a substitute check.
[69 FR 47311, Aug. 4, 2004, as amended at 82 FR 27584, June 15, 2017]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sao Tome and Principe National Day

# 									Sao Tome and Principe National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 12, 2022

On behalf of the United States, I extend my best wishes and congratulations to the people of Sao Tome and Principe on the 47th anniversary of your independence.

On this occasion, we applaud Sao Tome and Principe’s commitment to democracy and good governance.

We look forward to strengthening our partnership on shared priorities, such as maritime security, and wish your nation continued success and prosperity.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSao Tome and PrincipeThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding Between the  Government of the United States of America and the Council of Ministers of Republic of Albania on 4G and 5G Security

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding Between the  Government of the United States of America and the Council of Ministers of Republic of Albania on 4G and 5G Security							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Brussels, Belgium

June 13, 2021

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, Mr. Prime Minister, thank you very much for – first of all, for being here today, but thank you much more importantly for the work that we’ve done together.  I think we’re setting a very strong example together here today, particularly on the need to make sure that when it comes to our most sensitive technology and networks we have, we’re working with trusted vendors.  That’s particularly important now and a strong message to send out, I think.  And more broadly, I’m really grateful for the work that United States and Albanian have been able to do together in so many different areas, including the Defender 21 exercises that we did so successfully.  We’re very much looking forward to you assuming you’re seen on the United Nations Security Council.  I think there’ll be a lot of good work, I think, to do together there.  And across the board, this partnership is growing stronger, growing deeper, and we very much appreciate your leadership and helping to do that.  So thank you for today. 

PRIME MINISTER RAMA:  Thank you very much.  And for me and for us in Albania, it’s a very important moment because, as I believe you know, we have undertaken these issues on our sides this – some years, asking also the other countries in the region join, and to put all together our effort for secure – for a very secure path of communication, and to put this path of communication, of very critical services in the hands of the people of Albania – in the hands of institutions of our security forces, and to not allow – and this may be a compromise by third actors and sometimes malign actors.  So it’s – as always, a pride for Albania to stand with you and to be with the United States all the way.  So thank you very much for this and I hope that together we can convince also the other friends in the region to join in this. 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, thank you.  You’re setting a very strong example.  We’re grateful to have you as a partner now.  Thank you.

PRIME MINISTER RAMA:  Thank you.

###

Tags

5GAlbaniaBelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### §§ 217.137-217.140 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 267 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 267

To amend title 28, United States Code, to repeal the restriction on the 
   jurisdiction of courts, justices, and judges to hear or consider 
   applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of 
             certain aliens detained by the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2007

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to repeal the restriction on the 
   jurisdiction of courts, justices, and judges to hear or consider 
   applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of 
             certain aliens detained by the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Commissions Habeas Corpus 
Restoration Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON HABEAS CORPUS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States 
        Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        section:
``Sec. 1632. Jurisdiction to hear actions against the United States 
              relating to enemy combatants
    ``Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 1005(e) 
of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801 note), no court, 
justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any 
action against the United States or its agents, other than an 
application for a writ of habeas corpus, relating to any aspect of the 
detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of 
an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been 
determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an 
enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new item:

``1632. Jurisdiction to hear actions against the United States relating 
                            to enemy combatants.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of 
the enactment of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-
148; 119 Stat. 2739) which relate to any aspect of the detention, 
transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of detention of an alien 
detained by the United States since September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2014

p1020

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2014

148630(29)

KEVIN J. REID,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148630

COA: 315345 

Genesee CC: 12-098207-CZ

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 27, 2014 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
# C_2007038EN.01001201.xml

| 22.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/12

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 f of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises)

(2007/C 38/09)

| Aid No | Aid to small and medium-sized undertakings 3/06 |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Muncipality of Skien |
| Title of aid scheme | Næringsfond for Skien (Fund for Industrial Development in the Municipality of Skien) |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary decision of 16 June 2006, based on proposition from the Ministry of Trade and Industry in St.prp. nr. 66 (2005-2006) |
| Overall expenditure planned under the scheme | EUR 2,1 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.8.2006 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | The scheme expires when the amount has been exhausted |
| Objective of aid | Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Trade and Industry
  The Fund will be managed by the Skien kommune |
| Ministry of Trade and Industry |
| P.O. Box 8014 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |

Aid No

Aid to small and medium-sized undertakings 3/06

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Muncipality of Skien

Title of aid scheme

Næringsfond for Skien (Fund for Industrial Development in the Municipality of Skien)

Legal basis

Parliamentary decision of 16 June 2006, based on proposition from the Ministry of Trade and Industry in St.prp. nr. 66 (2005-2006)

Overall expenditure planned under the scheme

EUR 2,1 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.8.2006

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

The scheme expires when the amount has been exhausted

Objective of aid

Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Trade and Industry

The Fund will be managed by the Skien kommune

Ministry of Trade and Industry

P.O. Box 8014 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

| Skien kommune |
| --- |
| P.O. Box 158 |
| N-3701 Skien |

Skien kommune

P.O. Box 158

N-3701 Skien

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
#### §§ 217.163-217.170 [Reserved]