alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023049EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 February 2023

(2023/C 49/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0735 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3423 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9881 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,782 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 388,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7385 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8975 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,2164 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5416 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4389 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4265 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6971 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4220 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 351,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,9129 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2841 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 227,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6144 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,817 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,973 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5644 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,2984 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,5940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0735

JPY

Japanese yen

140,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88800

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3423

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9881

ISK

Iceland króna

151,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,782

HUF

Hungarian forint

388,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7385

RON

Romanian leu

4,8975

TRY

Turkish lira

20,2164

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5416

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4389

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4265

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6971

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4220

KRW

South Korean won

1 351,40

ZAR

South African rand

18,9129

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2841

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 227,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6144

PHP

Philippine peso

58,817

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

35,973

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5644

MXN

Mexican peso

20,2984

INR

Indian rupee

88,5940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2579 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2579

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the use of funds in 
 the Department of Veterans Affairs readjustment benefits accounts and 
   funds appropriated for such purpose to provide funding for State 
                          approving agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the use of funds in 
 the Department of Veterans Affairs readjustment benefits accounts and 
   funds appropriated for such purpose to provide funding for State 
                          approving agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS READJUSTMENT 
              BENEFITS ACCOUNT AND APPROPRIATED FUNDS FOR STATE 
              APPROVING AGENCIES.

    Section 3674(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``out of amounts 
        available for the payment of readjustment benefits'' and 
        inserting after ``out of amounts in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs readjustment benefits account and amounts appropriated 
        to the Secretary''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the first sentence and 
        inserting the following: ``For each fiscal year, the Secretary 
        shall determine the total amount available under this section, 
        except that the amount available from the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs readjustment benefits account shall be 
        $13,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Boundless Motor
Sports Racing, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul A. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A. Kruger
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 13, 2004
### SERVED: March 25,2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION· OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

InThe Matter Of: COASTAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2011-1005
Case No. 2010-S0-700037

ORDER CORRECTING JANUARY 29, 2013 HEARING TRANSCRIPT OnMarch 7, 2013, a Notice ofJanuary 29, 2013 Hearing Transcript Errors and Proposed CR 60(a) Corrective Action, and Order Setting Deadline to File Any Objection(s) was tiled. This Notice advisedthe parties ofthe administrative court's intentionto correct the January 29, 2013 Hearing Transcript and required the parties to file any objections to the proposed corrections onorbefore March 21, 2013. As oftoday's date, neither party has filed any objections to the Civ. R. 60(a) proposed corrections. It

### Is Hereby Ordered: Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(6), (8) and Civ. R. 60(a) the following corrections are hereby made in the January 29, 2013 Hearing Transcript: PAGE LINE READS CR 60(a) CORRECTION

217 18 accepted excepted 223 

### 1 accepted excepted 223 4 accepted excepted 223 

### 8 accepted excepted 223 10 accepted excepted 224 12 accepted excepted 224 

### 13 accepted excepted 224 14 accepted excepted

______ ....__....,...._ ___ i ·-

# ............**----------~**

PAGE LINE READS CR 60(a) CORRECTION

224 

### 17 accepted excepted
226 14 accepted excepted
276 13 Q I'm sorry. Continue. Ofcourse, Ofcourse,

Attachment: Service List

Page tof2

# ...........--------------

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1005 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL and FAX ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Ms. Rashawn Rich George, Esq. Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 SouthernRegion Federal AviationAdministration P.O. Box20636 Atlanta GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Michael Foster, President Coastal Air Transport, Inc., Respondent 

### P.O. Box 3985 Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00822 TEL & 

### FAX: 340-773-6862
The Honorable J.E. Sullivan U. 

### S. Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 ONE COPY



### U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in

### pers~n orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 lndependi:mce Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.**:~**
#### § 1203.29 Payment of award.

To receive payment of an award of fees and other expenses granted under this part, the applicant must submit a copy of the final decision that grants the award and a certification that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts to the Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. FHFA must pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days of receipt of the submission of the copy of the final decision and the certification, unless judicial review of the award has been sought by any party to the proceedings.

[75 FR 65219, Oct. 22, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 80233, Dec. 24, 2015]
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of D.L.G., Jr., a Juvenile

No. 06

- 22

- 00086

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law of

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

22JV0001

- CCL ). Memorandum Opinion

delivere d by Justic e Rambin

, Chief Justice

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted

. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellan t has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 15, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### § 160.220 [Reserved]
Exhibit 4.104


 


Maximum Mortgage Contract


 


Contract No.: 13100220140064999


 


Mortgagor: Hebei Ruiliang Trading Co., Ltd.


 


Mortgagee : Agricultural Bank of China, Shijiazhuang North City
Branch


 


Signing Date : November 11, 2014


 


Mortgage Definition
: To ensure multiple loans Party B (Mortgagee) has lent to Hebei Ruiliang Trading Co., Ltd., Party A (Mortgagor) is willing to
provide the Maximum Mortgage Guarantee hereunder for Party B.


  


Maximum Amount: RMB100,000,000


 


Mortgage Term : November 7, 2014 to November 6, 2015


 


Collateral: The assets Party A mortgages to Party B as Collateral
are listed in Maximum Mortgage Contract (No. 13100220140064997). The appraised value of the Collateral is RMB 161,293,200
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated this ____ day of
March 1999, effective as of March 1, 1999, by and between KONOVER PROPERTY
TRUST, INC. (formerly FAC Realty Trust, Inc.) (the "Company") and FRED P.
STEINMARK (the "Executive").

                                    RECITALS

        A. The Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of July 1, 1998 (the "Agreement").

        B. The Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows.

                                    AGREEMENT

        1. All capitalized terms shall be deemed to have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Agreement.

        2. Section 2(e)(ii) and Section 2(e)(iii) of the Agreement shall be
amended by deleting, in each section "twenty percent (20%)" and substituting
fifty percent (50%) in its place and stead.

        3. Except as otherwise noted herein, all other provisions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified and affirmed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hand and seal as of the
effective date hereof.

                                       KONOVER PROPERTY TRUST, INC.


                                       By:   /s/ C. Cammack Morton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           C. Cammack Morton
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



                                               /s/ Fred P. Steinmark      (SEAL)
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       FRED P. STEINMARK
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2659
KAREN SNELL, by and through her parents and guardians, Lillian and Stephen Snell, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES W. BUFFINGTON; DOYLE R. MYERS; GEORGE J. BROWN; GERALD BOARMAN; JOHN CESCHINI, Defendants - Appellees, and
THE PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; CATHERINE M. BURCH; MARY C. CANAVAN; THOMAS R. HENDERSHOT; VERNA P. TEASDALE; FREDERICK C. HUTCHINSON; SUZANNE K. PLOUGMAN, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-1184-AW) Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Matt P. Lavine, College Park, Maryland, for Appellant. Sheldon L. Gnatt, Roger C. Thomas, REICHELT, NUSSBAUM, LAPLACA & MILLER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Karen Snell appeals the district court's order granting a directed verdict for the Defendants in her civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). Snell, a high school student at the timeof the incidents involved, filed this suit alleging that the Defendants violated her constitutional rights by imposing a disciplinarysuspension as a result of her admitted involvement with an unauthorized student publication. The district court concluded that Snell had failed to produce sufficient evidence to prevail on her First Amendment claim or her Fourth Amendment claim and that in any event the Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.This Court will uphold the district court's entry of a directed verdict if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there could be only "`one reasonableconclusion as to the verdict'" under the applicable law. Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Co. , 993 F.2d 417, 420 (4th Cir. 1993) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986)). Substantially for the reasons set forth by the district court, we affirm. See Snell v. The Prince George's County Board of Education, No. AW-93-1184 (D.Md. Aug. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022226EN.01000201.xml

| 10.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 June 2022

(2022/C 226/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0743 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4391 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85653 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5045 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0495 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1818 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,689 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 396,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,5104 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4985 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3506 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4317 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6673 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4779 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 348,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4132 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1722 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5223 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 646,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7199 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,872 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,079 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2506 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0248 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,5260 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0743

JPY

Japanese yen

143,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4391

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85653

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5045

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0495

ISK

Iceland króna

138,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1818

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,689

HUF

Hungarian forint

396,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5925

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

18,5104

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4985

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3506

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4317

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6673

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4779

KRW

South Korean won

1 348,99

ZAR

South African rand

16,4132

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1722

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5223

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 646,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7199

PHP

Philippine peso

56,872

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,079

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2506

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0248

INR

Indian rupee

83,5260

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# Official Journal L 37/8 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 37 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 498 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 37

English edition

Legislation

Volume 498 February 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock — noise’ of the trans-European conventional rail system (
  notified under document number C(2005) 5666
  ) (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock — noise’ of the trans-European conventional rail system (
  notified under document number C(2005) 5666
  ) (1)

notified under document number C(2005) 5666

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1221.7 Segregation of collateral. ( a ) A covered swap entity that posts any collateral other than for variation margin with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that all funds or other property other than variation margin provided by the covered swap entity be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( b ) A covered swap entity that collects initial margin required by § 1221.3(a) with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that such initial margin be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the custodian must act pursuant to a custody agreement that: ( 1 ) Prohibits the custodian from rehypothecating, repledging, reusing, or otherwise transferring (through securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement or other means) the collateral held by the custodian, except that cash collateral may be held in a general deposit account with the custodian if the funds in the account are used to purchase an asset described in § 1221.6(a)(2) or (b), such asset is held in compliance with this § 1221.7, and such purchase takes place within a time period reasonably necessary to consummate such purchase after the cash collateral is posted as initial margin; and
( 2 ) Is a legal, valid, binding, and enforceable agreement under the laws of all relevant jurisdictions, including in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a custody agreement may permit the posting party to substitute or direct any reinvestment of posted collateral held by the custodian, provided that, with respect to collateral collected by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 1221.3(a) or posted by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 1221.3(b), the agreement requires the posting party to: ( 1 ) Substitute only funds or other property that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 1221.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 1221.3; and
( 2 ) Direct reinvestment of funds only in assets that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 1221.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 1221.3.
#### § 1254.3 Computation of time.

For purposes of this part, each time period begins on the day after the relevant event occurs *(e.g.,* the day after a submission is made) and continues through the last day of the relevant period. When the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period runs until the end of the next business day.
#### § 19.201 Petition for reinstatement.

At the expiration of the period of time designated in the order of debarment, the Comptroller may entertain a petition for reinstatement from any person debarred from practice before the OCC. The Comptroller may grant reinstatement only if satisfied that the petitioner is likely to act in accordance with the regulations in this part, and that granting reinstatement would not be contrary to the public interest. Any request for reinstatement is limited to written submissions unless the Comptroller, at the Comptroller's discretion, affords the petitioner a hearing.
#### § 141.7 Corporate debt security.

The term *corporate debt security* means a marketable obligation, evidencing the indebtedness of any corporation in the form of a bond, note and/or debenture which is commonly regarded as a debt security and is not predominantly speculative in nature. A security is marketable if it may be sold with reasonable promptness at a price which corresponds reasonably to its fair value.
42323.

#### HOLLOWAY et al. v. POPPELL.

Felton, Chief Judge.

A valid filing of a transcript of evidence prepared from recollection requires the agreement of the parties or their counsel thereon, or, in case of the inability of the parties to agree as to the correctness of such transcript, either the decision of the trial judge thereon or, if he is unable to recall what “transpired,” an order so stating. *Code Ann.*§ 6-805 (g) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). The transcript of evidence prepared from recollection and filed in the trial court by appellants meets none of the above requirements, being signed only by counsel for appellants. A determination *532of the question presented in this appeal from the judgment on the direction of the verdict involves necessarily a consideration of the evidence; and where the evidence is not properly brought up all questions requiring a consideration of evidence will be resolved in favor of the judgment, and it will be affirmed. *Giles v. Peachtree Pantries,*209 Ga. 536 (74 SE2d 545) and cit.; *Clark v. State,*219 Ga. 680, 683 (2) (135 SE2d 270) and cit.; *State Hwy. Dept. v. Attaway,*97 Ga. App. 140 (1) (102 SE2d 514) and cit. Therefore, since no approved transcript is in this record we are required to affirm the judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee.

Submitted September 9, 1966

Decided October 28, 1966.

*Albert E. Butler,*for appellants.

*Thomas & Howard, W. Dan Roberts,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Parnell, JJ., concur.*