alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1221.4 Variation margin. ( a ) *General.* After the date on which a covered swap entity enters into a non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap with a swap entity or financial end user, the covered swap entity shall collect variation margin equal to the variation margin amount from the counterparty to such non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap when the amount is positive and post variation margin equal to the variation margin amount to the counterparty to such non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap when the amount is negative.
( b ) *Timing.* A covered swap entity shall comply with the variation margin requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section on each business day, for a period beginning on or before the business day following the day of execution and ending on the date the non-cleared swap or non-cleared security based swap terminates or expires.
( c ) *Other counterparties.* A covered swap entity is not required to collect or post variation margin with respect to any non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap described in § 1221.1(d). For any other non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap between a covered swap entity and a counterparty that is neither a financial end user nor a swap entity, the covered swap entity shall collect variation margin at such times and in such forms and such amounts (if any), that the covered swap entity determines appropriately addresses the credit risk posed by the counterparty and the risks of such non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap.
KENNETH L. SHIRAH, SR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4157

Opinion filed November 5, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Kenneth L. Shirah, Sr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
427 A.2d 239

#### Commonwealth v. Jackson, Appellant.

Submitted December 8, 1978.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P. J., and HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
# C_2022160EN.01002601.xml

| 13.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2022

(2022/C 160/08)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0861 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4379 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83455 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3320 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0131 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,450 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 377,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6552 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9417 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,9548 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4599 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3724 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5112 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5874 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4803 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,8490 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9199 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5513 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 609,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5972 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,574 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,531 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0944 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5616 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,7285 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0861

JPY

Japanese yen

136,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4379

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83455

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3320

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0131

ISK

Iceland króna

139,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,450

HUF

Hungarian forint

377,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6552

RON

Romanian leu

4,9417

TRY

Turkish lira

15,9548

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4599

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3724

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5112

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5874

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4803

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,49

ZAR

South African rand

15,8490

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9199

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5513

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 609,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5972

PHP

Philippine peso

56,574

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,531

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0944

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5616

INR

Indian rupee

82,7285

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1070.59 Restrictions on disclosure.

The CFPB will not disclose any record about an individual contained in a system of records to any person or agency without the prior written consent of that individual unless the disclosure is authorized by 5 U.S.C. 552a(b). Disclosures authorized by 5 U.S.C. 552a(b) include disclosures that are compatible with one or more routine uses that are contained within the CFPB's Systems of Records Notices, which are available on the CFPB's website, at *http://www.consumerfinance.gov.*
CITY OF PENDLETON 

November 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Albert Muldoon 

United States Dept. of Transportation 

Essential Air Service Division 

Washington, D.C. 

Re: EAS subsidy for Pendleton 

Gentlemen: 

Office of the Mayor 

500 S.W. Dorion Avenue 

Pendleton, Oregon 97801-2090 

Telephone (541) 966-0201 

FAX (541) 966-0231 

TOO (541) 966-0230 

www.pendleton.or.us 

L .. } 

·u 

The Pendleton City Council, at their November 6, 2012 meeting, heard and discussed 

the two proposals to provide commercial air service between Pendleton and Portland, 

Oregon for the period beginning January 1, 2013. The Council voted unanimously to 

recommend the proposal of SeaPort Airlines for 4 years in the amount of 

$1,834,708,681 for 2013, and $1,926,444 for years 2014, 15, and 16. 

The City Council also unanimously voted to waive the twin engine specifications for 

EAS proposals. 

Please let us know if you need any additional information for us. 

Thank you for all your assistance, support, and cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

Jk4f w 1/&uA_ 

Phillip W. Houk 

Mayor 

Cc: Robert L. McKinney, President, SeaPort Airlines, Portland, Oregon 

Robert B. Karns, V.P. Sovereign Air, Inc., Belcourt, NO 

Governor John Kitzhaber, Salem, Oregon 

Mark Gardiner, Chair, Oregon Dept. of Aviation Board 

.... Home ojthe World Famous Pendleton Round-Up ....
# C_2022083EN.01000101.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 February 2022

(2022/C 83/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1354 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83425 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5796 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0452 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,337 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 356,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5201 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,4678 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5754 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4424 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8566 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6896 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5255 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 356,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0858 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1840 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5355 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 304,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7528 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,403 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,2815 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,435 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,8435 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0270 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6525 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1354

JPY

Japanese yen

130,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83425

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5796

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0452

ISK

Iceland króna

140,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,337

HUF

Hungarian forint

356,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5201

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

15,4678

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5754

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4424

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8566

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6896

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5255

KRW

South Korean won

1 356,45

ZAR

South African rand

17,0858

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1840

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5355

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 304,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7528

PHP

Philippine peso

58,403

RUB

Russian rouble

86,2815

THB

Thai baht

36,435

BRL

Brazilian real

5,8435

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0270

INR

Indian rupee

84,6525

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2022024EN.01000101.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 24/01)

Last publication

OJ C 11, 10.1.2022

Past publications

OJ C 2, 3.1.2022

OJ C 513, 20.12.2021

OJ C 502, 13.12.2021

OJ C 490, 6.12.2021

OJ C 481, 29.11.2021

OJ C 471, 22.11.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert E. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 5, 2009 |   | /s/ Robert E. Quinn                                 |
|--------|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Robert E. Quinn                                     |
|   |             |   | Vice President,  Finance, Treasurer, and            |
|   |             |   | Corporate Controller  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 225

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

#### § 225.130 Issuance and sale of short-term debt obligations by bank holding companies.

For text of interpretation, see § 250.221 of this chapter.

[38 FR 35231, Dec. 26, 1973]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29199]

[[Page 70428]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2011-OS-0120]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice to Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is deleting a systems 
of record notice from its existing inventory of record systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
December 14, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, 2nd floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard, Privacy Act 
Officer, Office of Freedom of Information, Washington Headquarters 
Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1155, or by phone 
at (571) 372-0461.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete one 
system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed 
deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act 
of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of 
a new or altered system report.

    Dated: November 7, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion

DWHS B44
    OSD Travel File (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).

Reason:
    Based on a recent review of DWHS B44, OSD Travel File (February 22, 
1993, 58 FR 10227), it has been determined it is no longer being used 
and all records have reached the record retention requirements and have 
been destroyed; therefore this system can now be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2011-29199 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                  2000 Amendment to Third Amended and Restated
                  1995 Stock Option Plan of JAKKS PACIFIC, INC.


                  The Third Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan is
hereby amended as follows:

                  1. Capitalized terms are used herein as defined in the Third
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan of JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

                  2. Section 3 of the Third Amended Plan is amended by replacing
the second sentence thereof with the following:

                  The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be
                  issued pursuant to Options granted under the Third Amended
                  Plan shall not exceed Three Million Two Hundred Seventy Five
                  Thousand (3,275,000) shares, subject to adjustment in
                  accordance with the provisions of Section 13 hereof.

<PAGE>   2

                  3. This 2000 Amendment to the Third Amended Plan was adopted
by the Board on May 11, 2000, but shall become effective only if and as of the
date on which it is ratified and approved by the Company's stockholders in
accordance with Section 16 thereof.


                                        2
#### Louis Kopf, Plaintiff, *v.*The Dry Dock Savings Institution, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

June, 1900.)

Savings bank — Husband of depositor bound by rule of bank forbidding payment to anyone except her representatives.

A wife, accompanied by her husband, deposited money in a savings bank under rules, one of which provided that “ on the decease of any depositor the amount standing to the credit of the deceased shall be paid to his or her legal representatives.” After several deposits and withdrawals had been made, the wife died and the husband sued the bank to recover the balance, as representing his own earnings.

Held, that the by-law bound him as well as his wife, and that the bank would not be protected in paying any one except her legal representatives.

Action to recover moneys on deposit.

S. D. Levy, for plaintiff.

Benjamin Wright, for defendant.

McAdam, J.

The plaintiff, accompanied by his wife, on April 11, 1895, went to the defendant’s bank, and a deposit of $500 was then made in said bank in the wife’s name. Subsequently other deposits were made and certain moneys withdrawn, so that on September 16, 1900, there was left a balance to the wife’s credit of $1,525.65. On the last-named date she died, leaving her surviving her husband, the plaintiff, and three minor children. The plaintiff now sues the bank to recover said balance on the ground that the moneys deposited were his earnings, citing Beaver v. Beaver, 117 N. Y. 428, and Orr v. McGregor, 7 N. Y. St. Repr. *36150, to sustain his right of action. In those cases the persons in whose names the accounts were opened had nothing whatever to do with opening the accounts and no knowledge of the transactions at the time; hence neither a gift nor a trust necessarily followed in their favor. In this instance, however, the wife accompanied her husband to the bank when the account was opened, and, as a condition of opening it, she was required to and did subscribe to the by-laws of the bank, one of which (art. 11, § 3) provides that “ on the decease of any depositor the amount standing to the credit of the deceased shall be paid to his or her legal representatives ”. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff is as much bound by this by-law as the depositor herself, it being the condition on which the deposit was received. See Howard v. Windham Co. Sav. Bank, 40 Vt. 597. The entries in the hooks of the defendant and in the pass-book of the depositor, and the by-laws, which are signed by the depositor, constitute the contract between the parties and the hank. Clearly a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would leave the hank open to an action by the legal representatives of the depositor, who are not parties to the record, and cannot he concluded by any adjudication made here. It follows, therefore, that the plaintiff has misconceived his remedy, and there must be judgment for the defendant.

Judgment for defendant.
#### § 141.26 Surplus.

The term *surplus* means undistributed earnings held as unallocated reserves for general corporate use.
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, James A. Finkelstein, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of News Communications, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ James A. Finkelstein
----------------------------------
Name:      James A. Finkelstein
Date:      November 19, 2003
----

|   | TITAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | (Registrant)              |

| Date:   | November 9, 2011 | By:   | /s/ MAURICE M. TAYLOR JR.            |
|-------------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------|
|              |             |            | Maurice M. Taylor Jr.                |
|              |             |            | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|              |             |            | (Principal Executive Officer)        |

|   |   | By:   | /s/ PAUL G. REITZ             |
|--------|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------|
|   |   |            | Paul G. Reitz                 |
|   |   |            | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   |   |            | (Principal Financial Officer) |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                         Credence DUO Rental Agreement

This Credence DUO Tester Rental Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of
May 5, 1999 ("Effective Date") by and between Artest Corporation, with offices
at 678 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA  94086 ("Artest") and MMC Networks Inc.,
with offices at 1134 East Arques Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA  94086 ("MMC").

Whereas, Artest agrees to provide engineering rental time on one high-pincount
Credence DUO to MMC;

Now, therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.  Terms and Conditions

A.  The duration of this Agreement is 12 months from the Effective Date.
B.  This Agreement is renewable with mutual consent of both parties.
C.  [*].
D.  Artest will make all reasonable efforts to provide additional hours to MMC
    if needed.
E.  [*].
F.  Artest to make all reasonable efforts to provide capacity and tester
    configuration based on MMC's forecasts. Artest and MMC to mutually agree on
    future capacity and tester configuration.
G.  In the event that MMC notifies Artest that it will not utilize the minimum
    number of hours per week, Artest will make all reasonable efforts to sell
    the tester time to another party. MMC will not be invoiced for any time that
    Artest is able to resell.
H.  Artest will invoice MMC on a monthly basis; payment terms are NET30.
I.  MMC will submit purchase orders based on their fiscal quarters.
J.  All precautions will be taken by Artest to insure that the tester and
    equipment are in excellent condition.  If any damage to the tester and
    associated equipment is caused by MMC personnel during usage, then MMC will
    assume responsibility for repair charges after MMC verifies cause of damage
    in association with Artest.
K.  The validity, performance and construction of this Agreement shall be
    governed by the laws of the State of California, U.S.A.

Accepted and Agreed:

Artest Corporation                          MMC Networks

Signature: /s/ Suheil Samaan                Signature: /s/ Sena Reddy
           -----------------                           -------------------

Name:  Suheil Samaan                        Name:  Sena Reddy

Title: Vice President, Operations           Title: Executive Vice President of
                                                   Operations
Date:  May 5, 1999                          Date:  May 14, 1999

* Confidential Treatment Requested
#### § 192.485 Required liquidation account provision in new Federal charter.

If a savings association converts to Federal stock form, it must include the following provision in its new charter: “Liquidation Account. Under appropriate Federal banking agency regulations, the association must establish and maintain a liquidation account for the benefit of its savings account holders as of ______. If the association undergoes a complete liquidation, it must comply with appropriate Federal banking agency regulations with respect to the amount and priorities on liquidation of each of the savings account holder's interests in the liquidation account. A savings account holder's interest in the liquidation account does not entitle the savings account holder to any voting rights.”