alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Egypt

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Egypt			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Egypt 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Egypt

During the review period, the government made its budget documents widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available online, except state-owned enterprise debt.  Budget documents did not include allocations to military state-owned enterprises, nor were audit reports for major state-owned enterprises made public.  Publicly available budget documents did not specify expenditures to support executive offices.  The information in the budget was generally reliable, but incomplete.  Egypt’s supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and its reports were not public.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  The government did not always make natural resource extraction awards publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework but did not disclose its source of funding or general approach to withdrawals.

Egypt’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Making information on state-owned enterprise debt publicly available;
- Including in its budget documents all revenues and expenditures, including those for remaining off-budget accounts, executive offices, and allocations to, earnings from, and debts of state-owned enterprises;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution carries out audits of the government’s executed budget and makes its reports publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Consistently making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available; and
- Disclosing the sovereign wealth fund’s source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Egypt 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentEgypt

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
----

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS

European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)

Support for Democracy, Good Governance and the Rule of Law

EuropeAid/119508/C/G

(2004/C 130/02)

The European Commission is seeking proposals for support for democracy, good governance and the rule of law in one or more EIDHR focus countries, listed in the Guidelines, with financial assistance from the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights programme of the European Communities.

The full Guidelines for Applicants are available for consultation at ‘European Commission, EuropeAid Unit F6, 54 Rue Joseph II, office 01/140, 1049 Brussels, Belgium’ and on the following Internet site:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl

The deadline for submission of preliminary proposals is 29.06.2004, 16:00 Brussels time.

----
# C_2023290EN.01002601.xml

| 18.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 August 2023

(2023/C 290/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0900 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4518 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,8666 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9555 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,4985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,078 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 384,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4718 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9385 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,5376 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6931 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4718 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5318 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8298 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4793 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 458,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,7417 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9387 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 726,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0712 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,738 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,542 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4127 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6156 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,4995 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0900

JPY

Japanese yen

158,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4518

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85395

SEK

Swedish krona

11,8666

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9555

ISK

Iceland króna

144,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,4985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,078

HUF

Hungarian forint

384,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4718

RON

Romanian leu

4,9385

TRY

Turkish lira

29,5376

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6931

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4718

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5318

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8298

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4793

KRW

South Korean won

1 458,28

ZAR

South African rand

20,7417

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9387

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 726,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0712

PHP

Philippine peso

61,738

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,542

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4127

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6156

INR

Indian rupee

90,4995

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. TROXLER HOSIERY CO., INC., and Gerald S. Schafer, trustee, Appellants.

No. 84-1846.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 5, 1986.

Decided Aug. 4, 1986.

Charles M. Ivey (Ivey, Ivey & Johns, Greensboro, N.C., on brief), for appellants.

John R. Fleder, Office of Consumer Litigation, Civil Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice (Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Kenneth W. McAllister, U.S. Atty., Richard L. Robertson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, N.C., David P. Grise, Office of Consumer Litigation, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Troxler Hosiery Company, Inc., was convicted of criminal contempt1 and fined $80,-000 plus costs2 for removing previously *724seized hazardous sleepwear and contracting for its sale in a foreign country and for falsifying company records to conceal its actions. Troxler was given twelve months to pay the fine, but on November 3,1982, it filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The government filed proof of a secured claim in the amount of the fine and costs, no part of which has been paid. Later, the government filed an adversary proceeding complaint in bankruptcy seeking a declaratory judgment that the automatic stay did not apply to its attempts to collect the criminal fine. In March 1984, the bankruptcy proceeding was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation.

The bankruptcy court ruled as a matter of law that the automatic stay applied to the government’s efforts to collect a contempt fine. On appeal to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, the order of the bankruptcy court was reversed. The district judge found that the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362 (1982 & Supp. II 1984) did not apply to the collection of the fine and costs for criminal contempt and that such fine survived the bankruptcy.

Troxler appealed, and the government filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal to include portions of depositions of Robert Andrew Troxler, Sr., and Robert Andrew Troxler, Jr. We conclude that the information contained in the supplement is not necessary to a decision in this case, and we deny the motion.

We adopt the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Hiram H. Ward filed July 28, 1984, 41 B.R. 457, and we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

1

. *United States v. Troxler Hosiery Co.,*672 F.2d 365 (4th Cir.1982).

2

. *United States v. Troxler Hosiery Co.,*681 F.2d 934 (4th Cir.1982).
427 A.2d 247

#### Commonwealth v. Senft, Appellant.

Argued March 6, 1980.

Allen H. Smith, for appellant;

Floyd P. Jones, Assistant District Attorney, submitted a brief on behalf of Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P.J., and WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of 10X Capital Venture Acquisition Corp. III (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guhan Kandasamy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2022 

 
/s/ Guhan KandasamyGuhan KandasamyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
## • 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of The State ofConnecticut and University ofConnecticut ) ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B Modification No.3

Whereas, the CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and the University of Connecticut ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8115B and all previous moditications thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: I. All references to May 1, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to comply with the emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(I) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are hereby replaced with May 1,2010. 2. Any references to October lSI with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009. 3. Any references to May 3I, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31,2009 and May 31, 2010. 4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009. 5. No laterthan May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 81 15B and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(I) and 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations. 6. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8115B, as modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Slreet • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.cLgov/dcp An Equal Opportunity Employer,

# - 

# . , University ofConnecticut 2 Trading Agreement and OrderNo, 8115B Modification NO.3 The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. University ofConnecticut

Name:**~ICH-A\li)** 

## A. MIL,L.Bl2, Title: 

### "D112eC:W(Z.., 

### lkPlcG 

# or**~\ll t20tvM~**  

### Tf>l-IC'/ Date: 

### D

### 4-- 01
. l-OO'j

Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order.

# ~-----L..--cd**_~_** Director Engineering & Enforcement Division Bureau ofAir Management 

## 0'+ -**2~-** 

### ..Loo'i Date



# RECEIVED APR 092009 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAl. PROTECTION

BUREAU OFAIR MANAGEMENT AIR ENFORCEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000793934
<NAME>                        PS PARTNERS VIII, LTD.,
<MULTIPLIER>                                                1
<CURRENCY>                                             U.S. $
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1
<CASH>                                                191,000
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          11,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      202,000
<PP&E>                                             17,137,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (4,800,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     17,690,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 365,000
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                         17,325,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       17,690,000
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,374,000
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         424,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      314,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       636,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   636,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          636,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           10.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           10.43
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131395 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131395 

 COA: 260550 
 Wayne CC: 04-009630-01

ANTONIO CINQUE COCHRAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
#### § 217.405 Method 2 score.

(a) *General.* A global systemically important BHC's method 2 score is equal to:

(1) The sum of:

(i) The global systemically important BHC's systemic indicator scores for the nine systemic indicators set forth Table 1 of this section, as determined under [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-217.405#p-217.405(b)) of this section; and

(ii) The global systemically important BHC's short-term wholesale funding score, calculated pursuant to [§ 217.406](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-217.406).

(b) *Systemic indicator score.* A global systemically important BHC's score for a systemic indicator is equal to:

(1) The amount of the systemic indicator, as reported by the bank holding company as of December 31 of the previous calendar year, expressed in billions of dollars;

(2) Multiplied by the coefficient corresponding to the systemic indicator set forth in Table 1 of this section.

Table 1 to [§ 217.405](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-217.405)—Coefficients for Systemic Indicators

| Category | Systemic indicator | Coefficient value (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Size | Total exposures | 4.423 |
| Interconnectedness | Intra-financial system assets | 12.007 |
| | Intra-financial system liabilities | 12.490 |
| | Securities outstanding | 9.056 |
| Complexity | Notional amount of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives | 0.155 |
| | Trading and available-for-sale (AFS) securities | 30.169 |
| | Level 3 assets | 161.177 |
| Cross-jurisdictional activity | Cross-jurisdictional claims | 9.277 |
| | Cross-jurisdictional liabilities | 9.926 |

[Reg. Q, [80 FR 49105](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-49105), Aug. 14, 2015, as amended at [81 FR 90954](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-90954), Dec. 16, 2016]
#### § 19.190 Scope.

This subpart contains rules relating to parties and representational practice before the OCC. This subpart includes the imposition of sanctions by the ALJ, any other presiding officer appointed pursuant to subpart C of this part and § 19.120, or the Comptroller against parties or their counsel in an adjudicatory proceeding under this part. This subpart also covers other disciplinary sanctions—censure, suspension, or debarment—against individuals who appear before the OCC in a representational capacity either in an adjudicatory proceeding under this part or in any other matters connected with presentations to the OCC relating to a client's rights, privileges, or liabilities. This representation includes, but is not limited to, the practice of attorneys and accountants. Employees of the OCC are not subject to disciplinary proceedings under this subpart.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80706, 33-65756) of OPTi, Inc. ofour report dated June 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of OPTi, Inc. as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the yearsthen ended, which report appears in the March 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of OPTi, Inc. 

 

San Ramon, California

June 29, 2010
# NCEURA

&G	&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Page &P of &N	&"Arial Narrow,Regular"U.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Department of the Interior

[The United States Geological Survey (USGS) surveys international mineral industries to generate statistics on the global production, distribution, and resources of industrial minerals. This directory highlights the economically significant mineral facilities of the independent countries of the former U.S.S.R.  Distribution of these facilities is shown on the accompanying map. Each record represents one commodity and one facility type for a single location. Facility types include mines, oil and gas fields, and processing plants such as refineries, smelters, and mills. Facility identification numbers (“Position”) are ordered alphabetically by country, followed by commodity, and then by capacity (descending). The “Year” field establishes the year for which the data were reported in Minerals Yearbook, Volume III – Area Reports: Mineral Industries of Europe and Central Eurasia. In the “DMS Latitiude” and “DMS Longitude” fields, coordinates are provided in degree-minute-second (DMS) format; “DD Latitude” and “DD Longitude” provide coordinates in decimal degrees (DD). Data were converted from DMS to DD. Coordinates reflect the most precise data available. Where necessary, coordinates are estimated using the nearest city or other administrative district.“Status” indicates the most recent operating status of the facility. Closed facilities are excluded from this report. In the “Notes” field, combined annual capacity represents the total of two or more facilities, plus additional comments provided by country specialists (see table 2, on map).][Abbreviations used: -, not applicable; DMS, degrees-minutes-seconds; DD, decimal degrees; kt, kilotons; NA, not available; Nb2O5, Niobium pentoxide; P2O5, Phosphorus pentoxide; S, surface mine; SU, surface and underground mines; SX-EW, solvent extraction / electrowinning; Ta2O5, Tantalum pentoxide; U, underground mine; F, coordinates are at or are very-close to a facility; A, coordinates are approximate or are the best-known locations]The production of these maps was performed by on-site contractors from ETI Professionals and University of Puerto Rico—Mayagüez Campus, Youth Initiative Program students under supervision of USGS National Minerals Information Center (NMIC) Global Minerals Analysis section (GMA) country specialists.
http://www.mqdata.com/data/show_operator.asp?id=1615957966

# image1.png
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradford R. Rich, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Bradford R. Rich    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Bradford R. Rich        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August 8, 2008     |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----