alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for PruTech Research and
                    Development Partnership III and is qualified 
                    in its entirety by reference to such 
                    financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000794357
<NAME>              PruTech Research and
                    Development Partnership III
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          1,951,646

<SECURITIES>                    6,200,387

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,152,033

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,152,033

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           293,505

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      7,858,528

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,152,033

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,494,125

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                526,821

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    3,967,304

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   87.23

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4529 Vendee loan post-origination fees. ( a ) The Secretary may charge a borrower the following reasonable fees, per use, following origination, in connection with the servicing of any vendee loan: ( 1 ) Processing assumption fee for the transfer of legal liability of repaying the mortgage when the individual assuming the loan is approved. Such fee will not exceed $300, plus the actual cost of the credit report. If the assumption is denied, the fee will not exceed the actual cost of the credit report;
( 2 ) Processing subordination fee, not to exceed $350, to ensure that a modified vendee loan retains its first lien position;
( 3 ) Processing partial release fee, not to exceed $350, to exclude collateral from the mortgage contract once a certain amount of the mortgage loan has been paid;
( 4 ) Processing release of lien fee, not to exceed $15, for the release of an obligor from a mortgage loan in connection with a division of real property;
( 5 ) Processing payoff statement fee, not to exceed $30, for a payoff statement showing the itemized amount due to satisfy a mortgage loan as of a specific date;
( 6 ) Processing payment by phone fee, not to exceed $12, when a payment is made by phone and handled by a servicing representative; and
( 7 ) Processing payment by phone fee, not to exceed $10, when a payment is made by phone and handled through an interactive voice response system, without contacting a servicing representative.
( b ) The specific fees to be charged on each account may be negotiated between the Secretary and the borrower. The Secretary will review the maximum fees under paragraph (a) of this section bi-annually to determine that they remain reasonable.
( c ) The Secretary may charge a borrower reasonable fees established in the loan instrument, including but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Property inspection fees;
( 2 ) Property preservation fees;
( 3 ) Appraisal fees;
( 4 ) Attorneys' fees;
( 5 ) Returned-check fees;
( 6 ) Late fees; and
( 7 ) Any other fee the Secretary determines reasonably necessary for the protection of the Secretary's investment.
( d ) Any fee included in the loan instrument and permitted under paragraph (c) of this section would be based on the amount customarily charged in the industry for the performance of the service in the particular area, the status of the loan, and the characteristics of the affected property.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2041, 3720, 3733)
[82 FR 35904, Aug. 2, 2017]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50158 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM EARL MILLS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-94-CR-112

- - - - - - - - - - October 29, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William Earl Mills appeals his convictions for bank robbery, using and carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of an unregistered firearm, and escape from custody. He argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence, that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for using and carrying a firearm duringNo. 96-50158 - 2 - the commission of a crime of violence, that the district court erred when it increased his criminal history level without discussing intermediate levels, and that the district court erred when it used the obstruction-of-justice enhancement twice when calculating the offense level on his multiple-count conviction. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the evidence Mills sought to suppress was not the product of an unlawful search because he voluntarily abandoned the duffle bag which contained the evidence. United States v. Quiroz-Hernandez , 48 F.3d 858, 864 (5th Cir. 1995). We further hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Mills guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. United States v. Bell , 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), aff'd , 462 U.S. 356 (1983). As to Mills’s contention that the district court failed to articulate its reasons for enhancing Mills’s criminal history, we find that the record provides a reasonable basis by which this court can conclude that the district court thoroughly considered the appropriate guidelines in arriving at its sentence. See United States v. McKenzie , 991 F.2d 203, 205 (5th Cir. 1993). Last, we find that the district court did not err when it overruled Mills’s objection to the enhancement of his base offense level for the obstruction of justice.
AFFIRMED.
1

The Honorable James S. Halpern, United States Tax Court.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2286

___________

Charles Robert Schetzer, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 3, 2002

 Filed: December 23, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Schetzer (Schetzer) appeals the tax court’s1

 decision affirming the

Internal Revenue Service’s assessment of federal income tax deficiencies against him

for the 1996 taxable year, and upholding 26 U.S.C. § 469(i) (allowing $25,000 offset

against income for rental real estate activities) against Schetzer’s equal protection

challenge. 
In support of his equal protection challenge, Schetzer argues, as he did below,

that section 469(i) improperly favors those who rent real estate over persons, such as

himself, who rent cars. We conclude Schetzer’s equal protection challenge is

unavailing. See Regan v. Taxation With Representation, 461 U.S. 540, 547-48

(1983) (statutory classifications are valid if they bear rational relation to legitimate

governmental purpose, unless statute interferes with fundamental right or employs

suspect classification; burden is particularly high to overcome presumption of

constitutionality of tax statute). Schetzer’s remaining arguments are either raised for

the first time on appeal, are frivolous, or are not material to the issue of his tax

liabilities. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2012128EN.01001001.xml

| 3.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/10

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur, dated 22 December 2011, in the case of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Kaupthing hf.

(Case E-18/11)

2012/C 128/06

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 22 December 2011 from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 22 December 2011, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Kaupthing hf., on the following questions:

| 1. | In the case of a discrepancy between the text of the EEA Agreement or rules based upon it, in different languages, so that the substance of individual provisions or rules is unclear, how should their substance be construed in order to apply them in resolving disputes? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the case of a discrepancy between the text of the EEA Agreement or rules based upon it, in different languages, so that the substance of individual provisions or rules is unclear, how should their substance be construed in order to apply them in resolving disputes?

| 2. | Having regard to the answer to question 1, does it comply with paragraph 1 of Article 14 of Directive 2001/24/EC on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions, that the national legislation of a State, which is a member of the European Economic Area, vests the winding-up board or other competent authority or agency with competence to decide whether information should be disclosed on the aspects described in the provision, with an advertisement published abroad instead of individually notifying all known creditors? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Having regard to the answer to question 1, does it comply with paragraph 1 of Article 14 of Directive 2001/24/EC on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions, that the national legislation of a State, which is a member of the European Economic Area, vests the winding-up board or other competent authority or agency with competence to decide whether information should be disclosed on the aspects described in the provision, with an advertisement published abroad instead of individually notifying all known creditors?

---
# C_2023027EN.01000101.xml

| 25.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 January 2023

(2023/C 27/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0858 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4399 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88368 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0053 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7193 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,874 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 397,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7130 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9171 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,4234 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5470 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4517 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5014 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6743 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4337 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,7687 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3642 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 259,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6448 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,122 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,609 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6164 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4603 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,6235 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0858

JPY

Japanese yen

141,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4399

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88368

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0053

ISK

Iceland króna

156,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7193

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,874

HUF

Hungarian forint

397,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7130

RON

Romanian leu

4,9171

TRY

Turkish lira

20,4234

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5470

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4517

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5014

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6743

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4337

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,60

ZAR

South African rand

18,7687

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3642

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 259,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6448

PHP

Philippine peso

59,122

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

35,609

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6164

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4603

INR

Indian rupee

88,6235

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Dain Gregory

From

Sent

To

Cc

Subject

Hi Ann

Hamilton Gordon

Monday December 29 2014 138PM

Williams Ann

Williamson Timothy Stover Michael Abele Ralph Dain Gregory Weitzler Ellen

RE Correction to my last message Still need Gordon's help

The South Branch Stream runs through the Penobscot Trust land in T2R8NWP ME and is a tributary to the

Mattamiscontis Stream

Gordon

EPA003477
Home...Sanctioning the Iranian Entity Responsible for a Bounty on Salman Rushdie

# 									Sanctioning the Iranian Entity Responsible for a Bounty on Salman Rushdie							

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 28, 2022

In response to the attack on author Salman Rushdie, the United States is designating the Iranian entity ‘15 Khordad Foundation.’ Before the attack, this entity had issued and subsequently increased a bounty on Rushdie’s life in support of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s order calling for Rushdie’s death.  We are designating it today for providing financial support for an act of terrorism.

In 1989, following the publication of Rushdie’s novel *The Satanic Verses*, then-Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for the author’s death, leading to attacks on Rushdie and those associated with him.  The fatwa was reaffirmed by Iran’s current Supreme Leader in 2017 and was republished by Iranian state-controlled media as recently as August 2022.  15 Khordad Foundation issued a bounty on Rushdie in support of Khomeini’s 1989 fatwa, and later, in 2012, increased the bounty.  Several of Rushdie’s translators and business associates involved with the publication of *The Satanic Verses* in several countries have been killed or severely injured as a result of this incitement, as have dozens of innocent civilians.

The infamous fatwa was intended to incite terrorism and violence, bring about the death of Rushdie and his associates, and intimidate others.  The United States condemns such incitement and the attack on Rushdie in the strongest terms as a blatant assault on freedom of speech and an act of terrorism.  Today’s action is another clear signal that we will not stand by in the face of it.

For more information on today’s actions, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWYD01000-2009-LL13100000-NB0000-LXSI016K0000]


Notice of the Meeting Schedule for the Pinedale Anticline Working 
Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(1976), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), and the Record of 
Decision (ROD) for the Pinedale Anticline Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (2008), the U.S. Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale Anticline Working 
Group (PAWG) will meet in Pinedale, Wyoming. Meetings are open to the 
public and public comment will be taken.

DATES: Beginning at 1 p.m. MST: November 5, 2009; January 28, 2010; 
February 25, 2010; March 25, 2010; April 22, 2010; May 27, 2010; June 
24, 2010; July 22, 2010; August 26, 2010; September 23, 2010; and 
October 28, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The PAWG meetings will be held at the BLM Pinedale Field 
Office, 1625 West Pine Street in Pinedale, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shelley Gregory, PAWG Designated 
Federal Officer, Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, 1625 
West Pine Street, P.O. Box 768, Pinedale, WY 82941; 307-367-5328; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f7c676a63636a7650687d6a68607d764f6d636221686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="582b303d34343d21073f2a3d3f372a21183a3435763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pinedale Anticline Working Group (PAWG) 
was authorized and established with release of the Record of Decision 
(ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement of the Pinedale 
Anticline Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Project Area (PAPA) 
on July 27, 2000 and carried forward with the release of the ROD for 
the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) of the 
PAPA on September 12, 2008. The PAWG advises the BLM on the development 
and implementation of monitoring plans and adaptive management 
decisions as PAPA development proceeds. Meeting agendas will include 
discussions concerning the implementation of the PAPA FSEIS ROD, the 
development of the Pinedale Anticline Project Office (PAPO), any 
modifications the PAWG or task groups wish to make to their 
recommendations, and overall adaptive management implementation as it 
applies to the PAWG. Additional information about the PAWG can be found 
at: http://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/field_offices/Pinedale/pawg.html.

    Dated: September 28, 2009.
Chuck Otto,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-24216 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Saul Jesus Diaz Herrera

# 									Saul Jesus Diaz Herrera							

DS Memorial

March 20, 2002

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2002**

Saul Jesus Diaz Herrera, Local Law Enforcement, died on March 20, 2002, in Lima, Peru. He was killed by a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device that detonated across fromU.S. Embassy Lima.

**Peruvian National Police Department image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementPeru

Back to Top
# C_2022440EN.01001401.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 November 2022

(2022/C 440/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0366 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87063 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9805 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9881 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4860 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,351 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 407,41 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7033 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9413 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,3009 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5433 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3841 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1092 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6757 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4229 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 389,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9080 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3790 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5415 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 224,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7202 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,410 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,069 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5470 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1620 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6875 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0366

JPY

Japanese yen

145,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87063

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9805

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9881

ISK

Iceland króna

148,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4860

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,351

HUF

Hungarian forint

407,41

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7033

RON

Romanian leu

4,9413

TRY

Turkish lira

19,3009

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5433

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3841

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1092

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6757

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4229

KRW

South Korean won

1 389,02

ZAR

South African rand

17,9080

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3790

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5415

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 224,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7202

PHP

Philippine peso

59,410

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,069

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5470

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1620

INR

Indian rupee

84,6875

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2005140EN.01000801.xml

| 9.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/8

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2005/C 140/09)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that some of the notified measures do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement and has further decided not to raise objections against the remaining notified measures.

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: Case 55 364

Title: Certain derogations from electricity tax

Objective: Taxation of electricity mainly used as a substitute for fuels. The electricity tax should curb increases in electricity use and stimulate the use of alternative energies. The derogations from the tax are necessary because of a loss of international competitiveness and to help companies adapt to a national tax which is higher than the minimum stipulated in Community legislation.

Legal basis: Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

Budget/Duration: Reduced electricity tax for the manufacturing, mining and quarrying industry, as well as for social works activities in so far as they use electricity for industry production in the same manner as the manufacturing/mining and quarrying industry until 2014. Regionally reduced electricity tax for Finnmark and North Troms until the end of 2006.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregister

---