alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.130 When must I settle a securities transaction? ( a ) You may not effect or enter into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security that provides for payment of funds and delivery of securities later than the latest of: ( 1 ) The number of business days in the standard settlement cycle followed by registered broker dealers in the United States after the date of the contract. The number of business days in the standard settlement cycle shall be determined by reference to paragraph (a) of SEC Rule 15c6-1, 17 CFR 240.15c6-1(a);
( 2 ) The fourth business day after the contract, if the contract involves the sale for cash of securities that are priced after 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the date the securities are priced and are sold by an issuer to an underwriter under a firm commitment underwritten offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 77a, *et seq.,* or are sold by you to an initial purchaser participating in the offering;
( 3 ) Such time as the SEC may specify pursuant to an order of exemption in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of SEC Rule 15c6-1; or
( 4 ) Such time as the parties expressly agree at the time of the transaction. The parties to a contract are deemed to have expressly agreed to an alternate date for payment of funds and delivery of securities at the time of the transaction for a contract for the sale for cash of securities under a firm commitment offering, if the managing underwriter and the issuer have agreed to the date for all securities sold under the offering and the parties to the contract have not expressly agreed to another date for payment of funds and delivery of securities at the time of the transaction.
( b ) The deadlines in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to the purchase or sale of limited partnership interests that are not listed on an exchange or for which quotations are not disseminated through an automated quotation system of a registered securities association.
[76 FR 49008, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 26349, June 7, 2018]
# C_2023265EN.01000701.xml

| 28.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/7

---

NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser for HR Strategic Foresight and Innovation

(Grade AD 14)

in the Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security (DG HR)

COM/2023/10436

(2023/C 265/04)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2023/10436) for the function of Principal Adviser for HR Strategic Foresight and Innovation (Grade AD 14) in the Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security (DG HR).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!7DFQww

---
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

December 8, 2023 SC-2023-0822 Ex parte Damion Joseph Bruno. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re:Damion Joseph Bruno v. State of Alabama) (Elmore Circuit Court: CC19-0941.60; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0082).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on December 8, 2023: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Cook, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Stewart, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
#### Frederick Klein, Respondent, *v.*The East River Electric Light Co. et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, upon a verdict directed by the court.

Beardsley & Hemmens (Samuel A. Beardsley and Henry J. Hemmens, of counsel), for appellants.

Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James (A. J. Dittenhoefer and David Gerber, of counsel), for respondent.

Hascall, J.

This appeal only brings up for review a question of law. Both sides, at the trial, moved for direction of a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. No motion for dismissal of complaint was made by defendants when plaintiff rested, as might properly have been done, so their point that plaintiff had not proven ownership *775is not well taken, the right to so object having been waived by their silence. We think that, under the authorities cited (96 U. S. 51, 7 Wall. 82 and 31 Misc. Rep. 87), the ruling of the trial justice was correct.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI 

GOVERNOR 

July 27, 2009 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

U.S. EPA Region I 

1 Congress St., Suite I 100 

Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 

Certification of Required SIP Elements Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 

2006 24-Hour PM1.5 NAAQS 

)ArA 

Dear MS.Conroy: 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed documentation that the Maine State Implementation Plan for 

air quality adequately meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) "infrastructure" requirements of section 

110a(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.SNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

As you know, pursuant to sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA, all states are required to submit 

plans to provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of the 8-hour ozone and 

PM1.5 standards . Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP requirements, 

including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance 

of the standards no later than three years after the promulgation of a new standard (September 21, 

2006) . 

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is submitting this document to certify that its 

existing SIP already satisfies all section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 2006 24-Hour 

PM2 .5 NAAQS. The initial Maine State Implementation Plan was approved by EPA on October 

28, 1972, and has subsequently been revised and expanded on numerous occasions. The 

infrastructure elements required by section 110(a)(2) are fully addressed by existing Maine 

statutes, regulations and plans . 

If you should have any questions, please contact Jeff Crawford at 207-287-2437 . 

James P. Brooks, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Attachments (1) 

cc : Ann Arnold 

Rich Burkhart 

Jeff Crawford 

SIP file (w/encl .) 

EPA file 

AUGUSTA 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333" 0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 

(207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 

RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 

PORTLAND 

312 CANCO ROAD 

PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 

(207) 822 " 6300 FAX: (207) 822"6303 

DAVID P. LITTELL 

COMMISSIONER 

PRESQUE ISLE 

1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK 

PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769" 2094 

(207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 

web site : www.maine .gov/dep printed on recycled paper
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ATORBE AARON ISIBOR, AKA Solomon 

Okuonghae, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-50365 

D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00143-RGK-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2021**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Atorbe Aaron Isibor appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying 

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, see 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Isibor’s 

request for oral argument is denied.

FILED

JUL 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-50365 

United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021), and we affirm.

Isibor argues that the district court abused its discretion by concluding that 

his medical conditions did not provide a basis for relief, and by relying on the 

nature of his offense rather than his rehabilitative efforts and other mitigating 

circumstances. We disagree. The court acknowledged that Isibor’s medical 

conditions were “not insignificant,” but reasonably concluded that they were not 

serious enough to justify release, given the circumstances at his prison and the fact 

that only one of his conditions subjected him to a potentially greater risk from 

COVID-19. Moreover, the court did not abuse its discretion in weighing the 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluding that, given the nature and scope of 

Isibor’s offense, as well as his criminal history, release was not warranted. See 

United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (a district court 

abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or without support 

in the record); United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 

2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the 

discretion of the district court.”). Finally, contrary to Isibor’s contention, there is 

no indication in the record that the district court impermissibly treated U.S.S.G. 

§ 1B1.13 as binding. See Aruda, 993 F.3d at 802.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, November 9, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, November 9, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24099 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 1320.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Financial Stability Oversight Council under sections 111, 112, 804, 809, and 810 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) (12 U.S.C. 5321, 5322, 5463, 5468, and 5469).
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to set forth the standards and procedures governing the Council's designation of a financial market utility that the Council determines is, or is likely to become, systemically important.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Second Meeting of the Semiconductor Informal Exchange Network

# 									Second Meeting of the Semiconductor Informal Exchange Network							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 25, 2023

On September 19-20, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Committee on Industry, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (CIIE) and its Committee on Digital Economy Policy (CDEP) held the second meeting of the Semiconductor Informal Exchange Network.

Launched on June 30, 2023, with support from the U.S. International Technology Security and Innovation (ITSI) Fund, this network of multistakeholder officials involved in industrial policymaking, exchanges information on the current state of the semiconductor ecosystem and recent public and private industry initiatives in their respective countries.  The perspectives from industry and other stakeholders, including from labor, civil society and the technical community, are essential to better understand the semiconductor ecosystem, identify evolving needs, and inform the design of policy initiatives.

The two-day event included stakeholder presenters and leading sectoral experts drawn from private industry, semiconductor associations, and labor unions.  Ensuring the resilience of the global semiconductor ecosystem requires the involvement of all stakeholders.  The informal exchange network discussed ways to encourage more information sharing, recognizing that semiconductor value chains are complex.  Further information is needed on the different stages of the value chain, including inputs, production capacity, output, and inventories to shape effective government programs and mitigate the impact of supply chain disruptions.  The network is looking at how best to understand high impact risks and interdependencies that can weaken or destabilize the broader ecosystem, in order to build more resiliency into the global supply chain.

The United States is committed to working with partners and allies to expand the global semiconductor supply chain and foster transparency and collaboration to make global semiconductor supply chains more resilient.

For further information, please contact eb-press@state.gov or see the website: The U.S. Department of State International Technology Security and Innovation Fund.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonOrganization for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentScientific and Technological CooperationUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of TecScan International,  Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Michael Meservy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Michael Meservy
Michael Meservy
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


October 14, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2394]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; SBIR: Home-Based Lithium Level Testing for Bipolar 
Patients.
    Date: March 10, 2009.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Rebecca C. Steiner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Room 
6149, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-4525, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1c2c5d4d8dfd4c3c3f1dcd0d8dd9fdfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa898e9f93949f8888ba979b9396d4949392d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 27, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-2394 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24042]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Notice of Proposed Information Collection Request

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 27, 2009, the Department of Education published a 
comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 43689, Column 1) 
seeking public comment for an information collection entitled, 
``Federal Pell Grant Program--Maximum Pell Grant to Children of 
Soldiers''. We are now withdrawing this information collection as we 
can obtain this information through other means, and therefore do not 
collect this data from the public. The IC Clearance Official, 
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, 
hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: September 30, 2009.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, 
Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E9-24042 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
C o l v i l l e 

Ikpikp

uk 

River 

R i v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

H a r r i s o n

B

a y 

Pitt Point 

B e a u f o r t

S e a 

F i s h

C r e e k 

T i n g m

i a

k s

i q v i k R i v e r 

K i k i a k r o r a k

R i v e r 

K o g o s u k r u k

R i v e r 

J ud y

Cr e e k 

Migu akiak R. 

1 W 1 E 

9 

2 

11 

8 

9 N 

1 W 

A R C T I C O C E A N

Cape Simpson 

Sm it h Bay 

15 N

3 2 1 W 12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4

Teshekpuk Lake 14

13

12

10

2 3 4 5

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

7

6

5

4

3

2

1 N 

2 3 4 1 E 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

1 S 

LONG-TAILED DUCK

Onshore Density (1992 - 2005) Nearshore Distribution (2006) 3

(Birds per Square Kilometer) (Number of Individuals)

High 1 to 10 4

Medium High 11 to 20

Medium 21 to 40

Low 5

None Observed

0 6 12 

Miles 6

Source: Onshore Density Data and Nearshore Data: USFWS Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK

Map 3-16. Onshore Density and Nearshore Beaufort Sea Distribution of Long-tailed Ducks in the Northeast

National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska 

2
§ 150.300 Where may I deposit fiduciary funds awaiting investment or distribution? ( a ) *Self deposits.* You may deposit funds of a fiduciary account that are awaiting investment or distribution in your other departments, unless prohibited by applicable law.
( b ) *Affiliate deposits.* You may also deposit funds of a fiduciary account that are awaiting investment or distribution with an affiliated insured depository institution, unless prohibited by applicable law.