alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          59,655
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             196
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,862
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    393,560
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         167,936
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           175,615
<LOANS>                                      1,730,399
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,445,717
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,971,062
<SHORT-TERM>                                    94,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             26,856
<LONG-TERM>                                    111,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,609
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,445,717
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,725
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,648
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   611
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,984
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,276
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,492
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,492
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      462
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 117
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,796
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,796
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.5
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,701
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,395
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,291
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      541
<RECOVERIES>                                       117
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            23,329
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Edward F. Leber et al., Respondents, *v.*Campbell Stores, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

Hyde & Leonard (Wm. D. Leonard, of counsel), for appellant.

Maurice J. Katz, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

It was clearly the duty of the defendant to place the goods in question in its warehouse; instead it the kraut to remain in a very exposed place in its wharf in the severest and most inclement weather during last winter. If this act was the cause of the damage, then, of course, defendant was liable to plaintiffs for the injuries sustained.

We think that there was abundant evidence showing that if defendant had performed its duty and placed the kraut in the storage-house, away from the wind and weather, that it would- not have been injured. Besides, plaintiffs duly warned defendant that failure to remove the goods from the wharf into the warehouse would surely cause its injury. Such warning passed un*805heeded and was ignored. Under these circumstances, we think, the question of defendant’s negligence was a question of fact for the jury and that it was properly submitted to them. It was also a question of fact, whether such act was really the cause of the freezing of the kraut and was also properly submitted. The evidence also shows that it was in good condition at the time of its delivery to defendant.

We do not think the verdict was excessive; in fact, it was reasonable. The evidence justified a larger one.

We cannot find any reason why the judgment should be reversed; it is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49825-49826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 11


Emergency Alert System (EAS)

CFR Correction

    In Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 0 to 19, 
revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 719, in Sec.  11.31, in 
paragraph (b), before the last sentence, reinstate the following 
sentence:

[[Page 49826]]

Sec.  11.31  EAS protocol.

* * * * *
    (b) * * * Unused characters must be ASCII space characters. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-23478 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
§ 1270.19 Reference to certain Department of Treasury commentary and determinations. Notwithstanding provisions in § 1270.6 regarding Department of Treasury regulations set forth in 31 CFR part 357: ( a ) The Department of Treasury TRADES Commentary (31 CFR part 357, appendix B) addressing the Department of Treasury regulations governing book-entry procedure for Treasury Securities is hereby referenced, so far as applicable and as necessarily modified to relate to Book-entry consolidated obligations, as an interpretive aid to this subpart D of this part.
( b ) Determinations of the Department of Treasury regarding whether a State shall be considered to have adopted Revised Article 8 for purposes of 31 CFR part 357, as published in the Federal Register or otherwise, shall also apply to this subpart D of this part.
HomeResources...Domestic Workers

# 									Domestic Workers							

Office of the Chief of Protocol

### Circular Diplomatic Notes and Notices

**October 2023: Hourly Wages for Domestic Worker Employment [1 MB]June 2023:**Domestic Worker Travel [578 KB]**September 2018:**Domestic Worker Program Requirements Note To Bilateral Missions [472 KB]**September 2018:**Domestic Worker Program Requirements Note To International Organizations [737 KB]**October 2015:**Diplomatic Note on Launch of In-Person Registration**September 2015:**Annual Review of Domestic Workers [164 KB]**June 2015:**Consolidated Requirements for Employment of a Domestic Worker [150 KB]**February 2015:**OFM Tax – Health Care Note [161 KB]December 2014: OFM Social SecurityDecember 2014: OFM Social Security NoticeInternational Organization Acknowledgement Statement [23 KB]Embassy Consulate Acknowledgement Statement [23 KB]OAS Mission Acknowledgement Statement [22 KB]A 3 And G 5 Employment Contract Template [2 MB]

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# Official Journal C 159/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.159.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 159 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5213 July 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.159.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 159

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5213 July 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2009/C 159/01 | Decision of the Bureau of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

European Parliament

2009/C 159/01

Decision of the Bureau of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 1239.31 [Reserved]
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW  ALL  MEN BY  THESE  PRESENTS  that I,  Robert  E.  Whalen,  in my
individual  capacity  and  as  Director  of  Unilab   Corporation,   a  Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  constitute  and appoint David Gee and/or
Brian D. Urban, jointly or individually, from the date hereof until such time as
this Power of Attorney is revoked in writing, to act as my true and lawful agent
and attorney-in-fact,  in my name and on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear
to,  acknowledge,  record,  file,  amend  and/or  modify and deliver one or more
registration  statements  for the filing of  securities of the Company under the
Securities  Act of 1933,  as  amended  (the  "Securities  Act")  and any and all
filings  made by or on behalf of the Company with the United  States  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the  Securities  Act and/or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 22nd day of March 2000.

                                               /s/ Robert E. Whalen
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Robert E. Whalen
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2697 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2697

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
   veterans' mortgage life insurance to include members of the Armed 
    Forces receiving specially adapted housing assistance from the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2007

 Mr. Lamborn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
   veterans' mortgage life insurance to include members of the Armed 
    Forces receiving specially adapted housing assistance from the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS' MORTGAGE LIFE 
              INSURANCE TO INCLUDE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
              RECEIVING SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING ASSISTANCE FROM THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 2106 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``veteran'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``veteran or member of the Armed Forces'';
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``veterans' election'' 
        and inserting ``election of the veteran or member of the Armed 
        Forces'';
            (3) in subsection (f), by inserting ``, members of the 
        Armed Forces,'' after ``veterans''; and
            (4) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``veteran's 
                indebtedness'' and inserting ``indebtedness of the 
                veteran or member of the Armed Forces''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``veteran's 
                ownership'' and inserting ``ownership of the veteran or 
                member of the Armed Forces''.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). I H / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OD OL F O H E R R E R A ME NA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73671 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 878- 235 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , a n dT A S H I M A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R od ol fo H erre raM ena, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e mo v a l o r d e r . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED DE C 08 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI H / Res ea r ch 07- 73671 2 § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo w hether apart i cul arconv i ct i on const i tut es an a g g r a v a te df

e lo n y , R a n dh a w a v . A s h c r o ft , 29 8 F . 3d 11 48 , 11 51 (9th C i r. 20 02 ), a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he IJprop er l y det erm i ned thatH erre raM ena i s r em ov abl e a s an agg ravat ed f e lo n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( iii) b e c au s e h is c o n v ic tio n u n d e rC a lif o rn ia H ea l th & S af

ety C od e § 11 35 1 w as for “ i l l i ci ttra ff i cki ng i n a control l ed s ub s tan c e ” a s d e f

in e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 1 0 1 ( a ) ( 4 3 ) ( B ) . See R endo n v. Mukasey , 520 F . 3d 967, 976 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( “ [ P ] os s e s s i on of ac ontr ol l e d s ubs t a nc e w i th the in te n t to s e ll c o n ta in s atr a f f ic k in g e le m e n t an dis a n a g g r a v a te df e lo n y .” ) . W e r e je c t H e rr e r aM e n a ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e r e c o r do f c o n v ic tio n w a s in s u f

f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h th a t h is c o n v ic tio n r e la te dto af e d e r a llyc o n tr o lle ds ub s tan c e . See U ni ted States v. A lvarez , 9 7 2 F .2 d1 0 0 0 , 1 0 0 5 - 0 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 2 ) , overruled on other gr ounds by Kaw ashi m a v. Mukasey , 5 3 0 F .3 d1 1 1 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . P e titio n e r ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s la c km e r it. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Richard B. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer of Hollis-Eden
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Daniel D. Burgess, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1.    The Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and



2.    The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/    RICHARD B.
HOLLISRichard B. Hollis Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated: March 12, 2004



By:

/s/    DANIEL D.
BURGESSDaniel D. BurgessChief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




Dated: March 12, 2004
#### BARR V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 23, 1913.)

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022484EN.01003701.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/37

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/19)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Finland

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Finland

Subject of commemoration: Climate research in Finland

Description of the design: The theme of the coin is a stylized beard lichen, with its root like structure embossed in the centre of the inner part of the coin. The outer sides of the inner part of the coin bear the lettering ‘CLIMATE RESEARCH’ in Finnish on the left-hand side and ‘CLIMATE RESEARCH’ in Swedish on the right-hand side. The bottom of the inner part of the coin bears the lettering ‘2022 FI’. The top of the inner part of the coin bears the mintmark of the Mint of Finland.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 400 000

Date of issue: Autumn 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q forRFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of RuvaneFund Management Corporation, the general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund  L.P., that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofRFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.

| Date:  November            14, 2006 |   | By:   /s/  Robert L. Lerner                                                       

President

Ruvane Fund Management Corporationthe general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Madagascar

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Madagascar			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Madagascar 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Madagascar

During the review period, the government made its enacted budget widely and easily accessible to the general public, including online, but did not publish its executive budget proposal or end-of-year report within a reasonable period of time.  Information on debt obligations, including contingent and state-owned enterprise debt, was not published in a reasonable period of time.  Budget documents did not provide a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, although the government published a revised budget.  Budget documents contained gaps and omitted details on natural resource revenues and allocations to and from state-owned enterprises.  The information in the budget, though incomplete, was considered reliable.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and has not published a complete budget audit since 2017, even though it did publish substantive interim findings.  The government did not formally award any natural resource extraction licenses or contracts during the reporting period, but procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts are specified in law.  Despite the formal suspension of permits, some companies obtain permits, and the terms of these agreements were not made public. Madagascar’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing an executive budget proposal and end-of-year-report within a reasonable period of time;
- publishing debt obligations within a reasonable period of time;
- providing greater detail in the budget on revenues from natural resources and allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises; and
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards and publishes reports within a reasonable period of time; and
- ensuring procedures for awarding natural resource extraction practices are followed in practice.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Madagascar 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMadagascar

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ching Lung Po
------------------------
Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003