alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022246EN.01000301.xml

| 29.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2022

(2022/C 246/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0561 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4394 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86350 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6543 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0101 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,726 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 398,55 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,5891 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5210 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3565 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2880 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6822 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4645 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 361,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9072 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0775 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 669,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6432 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,850 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,154 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5308 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0880 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,4080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0561

JPY

Japanese yen

143,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4394

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86350

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6543

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0101

ISK

Iceland króna

139,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,726

HUF

Hungarian forint

398,55

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6905

RON

Romanian leu

4,9443

TRY

Turkish lira

17,5891

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5210

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3565

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2880

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6822

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4645

KRW

South Korean won

1 361,75

ZAR

South African rand

16,9072

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0775

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 669,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6432

PHP

Philippine peso

57,850

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,154

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5308

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0880

INR

Indian rupee

83,4080

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
•

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State of Connecticut and

University of Connecticut

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and the University of

Connecticut ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8115B and all previous moditications thereto, do now, by mutual

agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May 1, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(I) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May 1,2010.

2. Any references to October lSI with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 3I, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31,2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 81 15B and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(I) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B, as

modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Slreet • Hartford, CT 06106-5127

www.cLgov/dcp

An Equal Opportunity Employer
. ,-,

University ofConnecticut 2 Trading Agreement and Order No, 8115B

Modification NO.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

University of Connecticut

Name: ~ICH-A\li) A. MIL,L.Bl2,

Title: "D112eC:W(Z.., lkPlcG or ~\ll t20tvM~ Tf>l-IC'/

Date: D4-- 01 . l-OO'j

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

~-----L..--cd_~_ Director

Engineering & Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

0'+ - 2~- ..Loo'i

Date

RECEIVED

APR 092009

DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAl. PROTECTION

BUREAU OF AIR MANAGEMENT

AIR ENFORCEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, CONDENSED 
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             3,141,071
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      8,327,175
<ALLOWANCES>                         173,105
<INVENTORY>                           91,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  12,195,201
<PP&E>                             8,928,621
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,979,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    22,187,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              8,640,500
<BONDS>                            3,945,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              43,768
<OTHER-SE>                         8,657,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      22,187,936
<SALES>                           24,630,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  24,630,139
<CGS>                              4,677,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     16,410,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   7,189,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   422,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      607,457
<INCOME-TAX>                         365,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  242,457
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         242,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.07
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2631

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To provide that the actuarial value of the prescription drug 

benefits offered to Medicare eligible enrollees by a plan 

under the Federal employees health benefits program 

shall be at least equal to the actuarial value of the 

prescription drug benefits offered by such plan to its 

enrollees generally.
2

HR 2631 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEGOTIATIONS BY THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

4 MANAGEMENT. 

5 Section 8902 of title 5, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(p)(1) A contract may not be made or a plan ap8 proved which does not offer to Medicare eligible enrollees 

9 prescription drug benefits the actuarial value of which is 

10 at least equal to the actuarial value of the prescription 

11 drug benefits which are offered to enrollees under the plan 

12 generally. 

13 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the Director of 

14 the Office of Personnel Management shall establish proc15 esses and methods for determining the actuarial value of 

16 prescription drug benefits.’’. 

17 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with 

19 respect to contract years beginning after the date of enact20 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32(a)


            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  IGENE Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
June  30,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F.  Hiu,
President  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1). The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2). The   information   contained   in  the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 28, 2005                By: /s/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                            _____________________
                                                STEPHEN F. HIU
                                                President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Order entered January 10, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01407 - CV CHRISTIAN CARE CENTE RS, INC., Appellant V. REBECCA O'BANION AND JANIS L. WOOD, INDIV IDUALLY AND AS PERSO NAL REPRESENTATIVES OF T EH ESTATE O F J.D. RICHMOND, DEC EASED, Appellee s On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 09 - 12201 

### O RDER We GRANT appellees/cross

- appellants’ January 6, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file reply to appe llant’s brief and cross

- appellee’s response brief . We ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 22, 2014. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Christian Faith Missionary Baptist Church

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00057

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 73452

Trial court: 127th District Court of Ha rris County

On February 27, 2014, counsel for Real Parties in Interest filed a Motion of Extension of

Time to File Response. The motion is GRANTED . The response of Real Parties in Interest to

the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, if any, is due March 10, 2 014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 28, 2014
```

[House Report 106-611]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-611

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3709, THE INTERNET 
                         NONDISCRIMINATION ACT

                                _______
                                

 May 9, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 496]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 496, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 3709, 
the Internet Nondiscrimination Act, under a modified open rule. 
The rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally 
between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
three-day layover of the committee report) against 
consideration of the bill. The waiver is necessary because the 
report was filed on Monday, May 8, and the bill may be 
considered on the floor as early as Wednesday, May 10. The rule 
makes in order the Committee on the Judiciary amendment in the 
nature of a substitute now printed in the bill as an original 
bill for the purpose of amendment, which shall be open for 
amendment at any point. The rule provides that the amendment 
process shall not exceed 2 hours.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given 
priority in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise 
consistent with House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during 
consideration of the bill and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                  

```
## NUMBER 13
- 2 4
- 00 0 5 0
- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.M.A., A CHILD

ON APPEAL FROM THE 138TH DISTRICT COURT

OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

A ppellant I.S.N. 1 f iled a pro se notice of appeal from a n order denying her motion

for a new trial

. On January 30 , 2024, the Clerk of this Court advised appellant that it
appeared that there was no t a final, appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 37.1, 42.3 (a)

. The Clerk informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if this defect was not

cured within ten days

. See id. R. 37.1, 42.3 (a). To date, appellant has not responded to

the Clerk ’ s notice or corrected the defect in the appeal.

1 To protect the privacy of the parties involved, we refer to them by initials. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(d); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.8(b)(2).2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file , is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Appellant ’ s notice of appeal assails a
December 20, 2022 order 2 rendered against her whic h denies her motion for new trial

“ on denial of appeal from CPS Court. ” However, an order denying a motion for new trial
is not independently appealable. In re B.L.R. , 592 S.W.3d 453, 462 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.) ; In re Adams , 416 S.W.3d 556, 560 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 2013, orig. proceeding ) ; State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan , 335 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg 2011, pet. denied)

. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See id. R. 42.3(a).

GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice

Delivered and filed on the 11th day of April , 202 4

.

2 We note that appellant ’ s notice of appeal was filed on January 12, 2023 in district court but was not filed with our Court until January 24, 2024. Given our disposition of this appeal, we need not further examine this anomaly. We further note that the district clerk ’ s office has furnished this Court with a copy of the final judgment in this case, the “ Order of Termination, ” signed by the associate judge on March 24, 2022, and adopted by the judge of the trial court on April 3, 2022. The final judgment terminates I.S.N. ’ s parental rights to D.P.M.A., and reflects that appellant was represented by counsel in that proceeding. Our records do not reflect that appellant filed a notice of appeal from that final judgment.
# C_2008239EN.01000801.xml

| 18.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/8

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision regarding the contribution of CHF 2,9 million from the Liechtenstein State to the Personalstiftung Ferdinand Frick AG

(2008/C 239/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.

| Date of adoption: | 12 March 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State: | Liechtenstein |
| Case No: | 60 953 |
| Title: | The contribution of CHF 2,9 million from the Liechtenstein State to the Personalstiftung Ferdinand Frick AG |
| Objective: | Ensure that all the outstanding pension claims of the insured employees were honoured following the bankruptcy of Ferdinand Frick AG |
| Legal basis: | Liechtenstein Government Bill No 79/2006 |
| Duration: | — |

Date of adoption:

12 March 2008

EFTA State:

Liechtenstein

Case No:

60 953

Title:

The contribution of CHF 2,9 million from the Liechtenstein State to the Personalstiftung Ferdinand Frick AG

Objective:

Ensure that all the outstanding pension claims of the insured employees were honoured following the bankruptcy of Ferdinand Frick AG

Legal basis:

Liechtenstein Government Bill No 79/2006

Duration:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


May 14, 2004                           /s/ Josephine Chaus
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Josephine Chaus
                                       Chairwoman of the Board and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly consolidated financial statements of UNUM Corporation and
Subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such contained
in UNUM Corporation's SEC Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,916,200
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      32,500
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,120,900
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  231,200
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               8,650,700
<CASH>                                          39,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,228,100
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         902,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,737,800
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,440,900
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,275,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                544,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,220,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,737,800
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,535,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            329,700
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (5,200)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 158,000
<BENEFITS>                                   1,152,500
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (59,400)<F2>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                298,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            202,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   202,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Reflects two-for-one common stock split completed June 2, 1997.
<F2>This item contains the amounts of deferred and amortized policy acquisition
costs for the period presented.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>