alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Turkmenistan

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Turkmenistan			

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan

During the review period, budget documents and information on debt obligations were not made public, including for state-owned enterprises.The government published aggregate revenue data online in its state-run newspaper.Publicly available budget information was not complete and did not include government revenue from natural resources.Information on the government’s off-budget stabilization fund was not publicly available.The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its reports publicly available despite purportedly reviewing the government’s financial statements.The government exercised legal authority over natural resource extraction but did not fully specify in law or regulation the procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.It was unclear if the laws and regulations that do exist were followed in practice.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not always publicly available.The sovereign wealth fund did not have a sound legal framework or disclose its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Turkmenistan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Making budget documents publicly available within a reasonable period;
-  Making information on debt obligations, including for state-owned enterprises, publicly available within a reasonable period;
-  Ensuring budget documents are substantially complete and reliable;
-  Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
-  Making supreme audit institution reports publicly available;
-  Fully outlining the criteria and procedures for allocating natural resource extraction licenses and contracts in law or regulation;
-  Following natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice;
-  Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available; and
-  Establishing a sound legal framework for the sovereign wealth fund and disclosing its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentTurkmenistan

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
March 31, 2003



Board of Directors
Alpharma Inc.
One Executive Drive
Fort Lee, NJ 07024

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003.  Note 3 there in describes a change in accounting principle from the last in, first out ("LIFO") to the first in, first out ("FIFO).  It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for domestic inventories has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable.  Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2002.  Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of November 7, 2009 meeting for Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets the date of the November 7, 2009 meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

# DATES:

The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on Saturday, November 7, 2009 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The Commission will meet jointly with the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force.

*Location:*                         The meeting will be held at the Somerset County Courthouse, Court Room #1, located at 111 E. Union Street, Somerset, PA 15501.                    

*Agenda:*                         The November 7, 2009 joint Commission and Task Force meeting will consist of the following:                    

1. Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance.

2. Review and Approval of Commission Minutes from August 1, 2009.

3. Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and National Park Service.

4. Old Business.

5. New Business.

6. Public Comments.

7. Closing Remarks.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501, 814-443-4557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. Address all statements to: Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501.

Joanne M. Hanley,

Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.

[FR Doc. E9-23700 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-25-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME
STATEMENT FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE BY SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         442,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,001,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                   160,395
<INVENTORY>                                     98,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,296,990
<PP&E>                                       9,574,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,948,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,684,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,566,743
<BONDS>                                      2,519,543
<COMMON>                                        39,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,941,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,684,397
<SALES>                                     18,821,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,821,574
<CGS>                                        2,620,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,818,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,869,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (190,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (190,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (190,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023104EN.01000101.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 104/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 94, 13.3.2023

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 83, 6.3.2023

OJ C 71, 27.2.2023

OJ C 63, 20.2.2023

OJ C 54, 13.2.2023

OJ C 45, 6.2.2023

OJ C 35, 30.1.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 1808.604 Agreement to Guarantee. ( a ) *General.* The Qualified Issuer must enter into an Agreement to Guarantee that sets forth the terms and conditions on which the Guarantor will provide the Guarantee of the Bonds issued as part of a Bond Issue.
( b ) *Terms and conditions.* The terms and conditions of the Agreement to Guarantee may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The form and amount of Guarantee;
( 2 ) Any prohibited amendments of Bond Documents or limitations on transfer of the Guarantee;
( 3 ) Terms and conditions of the Risk-Share Pool and any Credit Enhancement that may be required by the CDFI Fund and the Guarantor;
( 4 ) Provisions regarding the Agency Administrative Fee;
( 5 ) Representations and warranties of the Qualified Issuer;
( 6 ) Pledged security;
( 7 ) Financial covenants;
( 8 ) Events of default and remedies;
( 9 ) Assignment of Bond Loans to the Guarantor;
( 10 ) Guarantor payment does not discharge Qualified Issuer; subrogation;
( 11 ) Undertakings for the benefit of the Bondholder including: notices, registration, prohibited amendments, prohibited transfers, and indemnification;
( 12 ) Governing law;
( 13 ) Terms and conditions of Bond Loans;
( 14 ) Prohibition against subordination; and
( 15 ) Such other matters as the Guarantor or the CDFI Fund may deem necessary or appropriate.
( c ) *Access to funds.* In the event that the Qualified Issuer does not execute Bond Loan agreements for 100 percent of the Bond principal on the Bond Issue Date, the Qualified Issuer will have no further access to the amount of funds for which Bond Loan agreements were not executed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SEC. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of OM Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: March 30, 2005

/s/ Frank E. Butler
--------------------------------------------
Frank E. Butler
Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

/s/ R. Louis Schneeberger
-------------------------
R. Louis Schneeberger
Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of D.L.G., Jr., a Juvenile

No. 06-22-00086-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

22JV0001-CCL). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Rambin, Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 15, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2022118EN.01000601.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 March 2022

(2022/C 118/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0990 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4402 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0230 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8033 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,213 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 380,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7820 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,2554 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5017 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4024 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6007 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6053 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4949 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 354,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4896 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9633 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5713 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 696,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6098 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,461 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,542 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5077 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9524 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9875 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0990

JPY

Japanese yen

128,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4402

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83970

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0230

ISK

Iceland króna

144,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8033

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,213

HUF

Hungarian forint

380,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7820

RON

Romanian leu

4,9490

TRY

Turkish lira

16,2554

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5017

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4024

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6007

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6053

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4949

KRW

South Korean won

1 354,04

ZAR

South African rand

16,4896

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9633

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5713

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 696,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6098

PHP

Philippine peso

57,461

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,542

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5077

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9524

INR

Indian rupee

83,9875

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4705 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form. ( a ) *Use of form.* The Secretary shall use the standard flood hazard determination form developed by the Director of FEMA (as set forth in appendix A of 44 CFR part 65) when determining whether the building or mobile home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act. The standard flood hazard determination form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner.
( b ) *Retention of form.* The Secretary shall retain a copy of the completed standard flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for the period of time the Secretary owns the loan.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104b)
[62 FR 5533, Feb. 6, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24023]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Decision 
To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees at the St. 
Louis Airport Storage Site, St. Louis, MO, To Be Included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision 
to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at the St. 
Louis Airport Storage site, St. Louis, Missouri, to be included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for 
the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the 
evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: St. Louis Airport Storage site.
    Location: St. Louis, Missouri.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All workers who worked in any area 
and in any job capacity.
    Period of Employment: During the operational period from January 1, 
1946 through December 31, 1966 and the residual period from January 1, 
1967 through December 31, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efa0acaebcafacabacc1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcb3bfbdafbcbfb8bfd2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-24023 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2663 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, 
 Virgin Islands, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
                               purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, 
 Virgin Islands, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING CASTLE NUGENT FARMS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the southeastern shore 
        of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is the largest parcel of 
        privately-held land in the Virgin Islands and has been an 
        operating cattle ranch for 50 years.
            (2) This land has the largest and healthiest fringing coral 
        reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands.
            (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and pasturelands 
        with considerable cultural resources including both pre-
        Columbian and post-European settlement.
            (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large historic 17th 
        century Danish estate house that sits on over 4 miles of 
        pristine Caribbean oceanfront property.
            (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nesting and 
        night heron nesting, it is the home for the Senepol cattle 
        breed, a unique breed of cattle that was developed on St. Croix 
        in the early 1900's to adapt to the island's climate.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall carry out a study 
regarding the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 
Farms as a unit of the National Park System.
    (c) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2677 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2677

 To amend title 1, United States Code, to eliminate any Federal policy 
                     on the definition of marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2003

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 1, United States Code, to eliminate any Federal policy 
                     on the definition of marriage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Regulation of Marriage Is 
Appropriate Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF FEDERAL POLICY ON THE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

    (a) In General.--Title 1, United States Code, is amended by 
striking section 7.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 1 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 7.
                                 <all>
```