alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Farm Safety and Health Week, 2009

Our Nation’s prosperity has been built on the skill and productivity of our farmers and ranchers. Two centuries ago, many American families toiled in fields and grasslands so that they might feed themselves. Today, those in the agricultural sector provide food, fiber, biofuels, and many other life necessities for millions across our Nation and around the world. The hard work and talent of those in the agricultural industry, and continued advances in technology and efficiency, have provided great security to the United States.

As they offer great benefits to our Nation, farmers and ranchers also face significant risks in the course of their everyday duties. They often transport and operate heavy and hazardous equipment and work in extreme weather conditions. Farmers may be exposed to pesticides, fertilizers, chemicals, and dust that can be harmful to human health. They also work in dangerous areas such as wells, silos, and grain elevators. These individuals must take great precautions to protect their health and safety, especially since rural residents may have to travel long distances to receive trauma care for an accident-related injury. They must also take particular care to avoid accidents involving children.

As the fall harvest season approaches, I encourage farm and ranch families and workers to participate in farm safety and health programs. I also encourage them to follow optimal farm safety and health practices. Businesses and communities, and organizations and neighbors, can encourage one another to understand the risks of this work so that we can prevent accidents, prevent exposure to potential hazards, and save lives.

Working long hours at physically demanding and often dangerous tasks, farmers and ranchers provide for our Nation and countless others across the world. Even as they have faced risks, they have made our agricultural sector more productive and practiced good stewardship of our country’s natural resources. This week, Americans express gratitude for the untold benefits we enjoy from their labor, and we honor their achievements by urging continued commitment to the highest standards of safety and health. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 20 through September 26, 2009, as National Farm Safety and Health Week. I call upon the people of the United States to join me in celebrating the vital contributions of farmers and ranchers to our Nation and in reflecting upon the importance of farm safety and health in communities across America.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-23414

Billing code 3195-W9-P
# C_2021405EN.01000301.xml

| 7.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/3

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2021/C 405/03)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AD/394/21 – ANTI-FRAUD INVESTIGATORS (AD 7) AND ANTI-FRAUD EXPERTS (AD 9) in the following fields:

| Field 1 | : | Anti-fraud investigations and operations in the field of EU expenditure and anti-corruption |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Field 2 | : | Anti-fraud investigations and operations in the field of customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods |

Field 1

:

Anti-fraud investigations and operations in the field of EU expenditure and anti-corruption

Field 2

:

Anti-fraud investigations and operations in the field of customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 405 A of 7 October 2021.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
# C_2010054EN.01002201.xml

| 4.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/22

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for three EFTA States applicable as from 1 December 2009

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

2010/C 54/03

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To get the applicable reference rate, appropriate margins have to be added in accordance with the State aid Guidelines. For the discount rate this means that the appropriate margin of 100 basis points has to be added to the base rate. The recovery rate will also normally be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate as foreseen in the Authority’s Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (published in OJ L 139, of 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1).

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2009-31.1.2009 | 16,42 | 2,95 | 6,43 |
| 1.2.2009-28.2.2009 | 16,42 | 2,33 | 5,41 |
| 1.3.2009-31.3.2009 | 16,42 | 1,58 | 4,26 |
| 1.4.2009-30.6.2009 | 16,42 | 1,10 | 3,38 |
| 1.7.2009-31.7.2009 | 11,24 | 0,86 | 2,84 |
| 1.8.2009-31.8.2009 | 8,52 | 0,86 | 2,84 |
| 1.9.2009-30.11.2009 | 6,67 | 0,86 | 2,84 |
| 1.12.2009- | 6,67 | 0,72 | 2,84 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2009-31.1.2009

16,42

2,95

6,43

1.2.2009-28.2.2009

16,42

2,33

5,41

1.3.2009-31.3.2009

16,42

1,58

4,26

1.4.2009-30.6.2009

16,42

1,10

3,38

1.7.2009-31.7.2009

11,24

0,86

2,84

1.8.2009-31.8.2009

8,52

0,86

2,84

1.9.2009-30.11.2009

6,67

0,86

2,84

1.12.2009-

6,67

0,72

2,84

---
# C_2023126EN.01000201.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 April 2023

(2023/C 126/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0915 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4510 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3875 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9878 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,3855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,409 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 376,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6863 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9369 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,0195 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6312 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4704 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5682 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7387 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4507 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,8929 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5014 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 290,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8015 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,562 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,171 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5096 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9624 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,3655 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0915

JPY

Japanese yen

143,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4510

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87495

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3875

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9878

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,3855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,409

HUF

Hungarian forint

376,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6863

RON

Romanian leu

4,9369

TRY

Turkish lira

21,0195

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6312

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4704

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5682

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7387

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4507

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,81

ZAR

South African rand

19,8929

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5014

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 290,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8015

PHP

Philippine peso

59,562

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,171

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5096

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9624

INR

Indian rupee

89,3655

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2007143EN.01000701.xml

| 28.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/7

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1 f of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises)

(2007/C 143/05)

Aid No: Aid to SME — 4/2006 — Norway

EFTA State: Norway

Title of aid scheme: Wood-based Innovation Scheme

Legal basis: St.prp. nr 1, chapter 1149 under item 71. Yearly letter of allocation from the Royal Ministry of Food and Agriculture

Annual expenditure planned under the aid scheme: Annual overall amount: Approximately EUR 4,3 million per year

Maximum aid intensity: In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation, and in conformity with Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004, Articles 5a-5c

n

Date of implementation:

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: Dependent on yearly grants from the authorities

Objective of aid: Aid to SMEs

Economic sectors concerned: All sectors contributing to increased use of wood and value adding within the wood-based production chain (except aid to development of bioenergy production and pulp and paper production)

Name and address of the granting authority:

Large individual aid grants: In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
September 17, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

SUBJECT: Economy-Wide Impacts of Heavy-Duty Truck Fuel Efficiency and GHG 

Standards

EPA has undertaken an analysis of the economy-wide impacts of the proposed heavy-duty truck 

fuel efficiency and GHG standards. To estimate the impacts of this proposal on U.S. Gross 

Domestic Product (GDP) and personal consumption, EPA has used an economy-wide, 

computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The economy-wide model used in this analysis is 

the Intertemporal General Equilibrium Model (IGEM). The detailed output from the IGEM 

model are included in the associated spreadsheet.
41793.

#### MOORE v. THE STATE.

Argued February 8, 1966

Decided February 24, 1966.

*Robinson, Thompson, Buice & Barben, Sam S. Barben, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor General, C. Frank Strickland, Jr.,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. In support of the ground of the amended motion for new trial based upon newly discovered *198evidence the defendant attaches affidavits of two witnesses who placed him in Sunnyside, Ga. (some seventy miles from Gaines-ville, Ga. where the theft and stripping operation occurred) at the time the stolen automobile was being stripped. These affidavits are supported by the affidavits required by the decisions of the Supreme Court from which *Code*§ 70-205 (which was repealed by the Act of 1965, Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 39) was codified, and no countershowing was made by the State.

Under the decisions of the Supreme Court in *Fellows v. State,*114 Ga. 233 (39 SE 885), and of this court in *Saylors v. State,*supra, and *Graham v. State,*86 Ga. App. 896 (73 SE2d 46), and similar cases, the evidence as to alibi was of the nature which requires a new trial. While it is true that the defendant made reference in his unsworn statement as to his whereabouts at the time he was supposed to be “stripping” the automobile, there was no evidence to support his statement, and as to diligence, the one witness who placed him at the scene of the “stripping operation” was a co-indictee whose name did not appear on the indictment as a witness. Any inquiry as to the time of the theft, so that alibi witnesses could be sought, would have shown the actual theft took place hours before the time the defendant was implicated. Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying the defendant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence.

2. The evidence adduced upon the trial of the case did not authorize the charges upon lesser crimes as contended by the defendant. Under the evidence adduced he was guilty or not guilty of the crime charged.

3. Inasmuch as the case must be tried again and the evidence may not be the same on such trial the issues raised by the enumeration of errors that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, contrary to law and without evidence to- support it will not be passed upon.

*Case remanded for new trial.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
# C_2023271EN.01000101.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 271/01)

Last publication

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023

Past publications

OJ C 252, 17.7.2023

OJ C 235, 3.7.2023

OJ C 223, 26.6.2023

OJ C 216, 19.6.2023

OJ C 205, 12.6.2023

OJ C 189, 30.5.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Order filed, March 6, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01106-CR

____________

DOUGLAS WAYNE RING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 64814

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 20, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sarah Caldwell, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### § 1263.32 Official membership insignia.

Members may display the approved insignia of membership on their documents, advertising and quarters, and likewise use the words “Member Federal Home Loan Bank System.”
Hi BobIn reference to your email of 2/7/12 and your question regarding the SO2 emissions in 

Table 10-8 and 10-9, the tables below have been corrected to reflect the sulfur 

reductions addressed in 9.4.2, specifically the area source reductions resulting from 

controls of 51,817 TPY. These corrections apply to the 2018 emissions for both MANEVU and NYS. Those numbers have been corrected and are reflected in Tables 10-8 and 

10-9. There is no Table 10-10; this was a numbering error. There are also minor 

corrections to 10.4.6. Please replace our 3/15/10 version of 10.4.6 with the information 

below.

10.4.6 Changes to Emissions by 2018

The emission inventory for New York projects changes to point, area and mobile 

source inventories by the end of the first implementation period resulting from 

population growth; industrial, energy and natural resources development; land 

management; and air pollution control. A summary of these changes is given in 

Table 10-9 for emissions of sulfur dioxide. More detail is provided in:

 Development of Emissions Projections for 2009, 2012, and 2018 for 

NonEGU Point, Area, and Non-road Sources in the MANE-VU Region

(MACTEC, February 2007) (Appendix E), and

 Documentation of 2018 Emissions from Electric Generation Units in the 

Eastern United States for MANE-VU’s Regional Haze Modeling (Alpine 

Geophysics, March 2008) (Appendix W).

Table 10-8 - Emissions from Point, Area and Mobile Sources in MANE-VU (SO2

tpy)

Baseline 2002 2018 (with additional 

measures for RPG)

Area 286,921 253,620

Non-EGU 

Point

264,377 91,438

EGU Point 1,643,257 368,717

On-Road 

Mobile

40,091 8,757

Non-Road 

Mobile

57,257 8,643

Table 10-9 - Emissions from Point, Area and Mobile Sources in New York (SO2

tpy)

Baseline 2002 2018 (with additional 

measures for RPG)

Area 130,409 89,591

Non-EGU 

Point

58,197 46,038

EGU Point 236,719 72,898

On-Road 

Mobile

10,229 1,794

Non-Road 

Mobile

13,288 1,686
Source: ftp://ftp.marama.org/2018%20Best%20and%20Final%20Modeling%20Files/Summaries/10.4.5 

Emissions Tables_032408.xls
#### § 150.390 May my officer or employee retain compensation for acting as a co-fiduciary?

You may not permit your officers or employees to retain any compensation for acting as a co-fiduciary with you in the administration of a fiduciary account, except with the specific approval of your board of directors.
# C_2023264EN.01004201.xml

| 27.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/42

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 July 2023

(2023/C 264/08)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1059 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4517 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,5313 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9549 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,050 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 384,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4200 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9288 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,8020 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6401 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4620 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6308 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7814 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4682 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 410,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,5801 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9109 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 639,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0313 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,421 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,910 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2401 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6702 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,7231 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1059

JPY

Japanese yen

155,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4517

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85695

SEK

Swedish krona

11,5313

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9549

ISK

Iceland króna

145,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,050

HUF

Hungarian forint

384,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4200

RON

Romanian leu

4,9288

TRY

Turkish lira

29,8020

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6401

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4620

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6308

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7814

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4682

KRW

South Korean won

1 410,55

ZAR

South African rand

19,5801

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9109

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 639,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0313

PHP

Philippine peso

60,421

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,910

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2401

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6702

INR

Indian rupee

90,7231

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2295
<PP&E>                                            4363
<DEPRECIATION>                                     832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2791860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3548
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2789582)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5826
<SALES>                                          30147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 30147
<CGS>                                            16532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                547438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (533823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (533823)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
OFFICE OF ‘I-NE AlTORNRY GENERAL OF - 

AWTtN 
.k. i ij 

Honorable John R. Shook~, Page E 

tiomi are rillsd xithout expense to the 

County, the Court bellming that the additional training eooured by suoh employee6 

nil1 Breatly benerit tbs County and would 

con~tltllte El good investuidnt oven if it 

were necrsssary to pay for substitute emQlOyll%8. 

"our quef3tion than l,r 

wGan the Comaiesloners* Court grant a 

lwva or abmenuo, with pay, to oomtp health 

employees to enable therp to take a special 

traInin& aourcw outside or the County where 

the State Department of Health la providing: 

substitutes to perform their Qutiee at 110 

mlM.tiona1 ooat to the Gonntrrp . . r" 

Under the authorities o&ted in 

or this dapnrtaeaent; a aopy of utiah la 

o fnion No. O-M&, 

enc E 0mea hanrith; it 

b our opinion that your question should be answered la the 

nsgattve an4 it 2.6 no amwered. 

X rurther rwuson why the orxinty xuap not pay the 

edertu 0r therr eaploymos whllo they em 00 a loat0 or 

abamnee 14 that 8wh eat would asoust to a 

%a Inh ib ited by Ar t%,p”n” o 

mtu& 

3 

rhiah 

l 8, Swtfo n 58 o f c ur c a a stita o a . 

Ver y tr uly y o ul=B 

FIX? ASSISTANT 

A'ZTSRNEY GENERAL vim. S. Bsnnl.ng 

Amidant 

COMMm-EE
# C_2006002EN.01002401.xml

| 5.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/24

---

Public presentation of the preliminary findings of the energy sector inquiry

(2006/C 2/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has conducted a sector inquiry into the electricity sector pursuant to Article 17 of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement. A public presentation of the preliminary findings of this inquiry will be held in Brussels on 16 February 2006 and an opportunity to comment will be given. Interest in attending this public presentation should be expressed before 11 January 2006 by e-mail to:

electinquiry@eftasurv.int

Further information can be found on the website of the EFTA Surveillance Authority:

http://www.eftasurv.int/information/pressreleases/2005pr/dbaFile8190.html

---
§ 1208.31 Refunds. ( a ) Where FHFA is the creditor agency, FHFA shall promptly refund any amount deducted under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 5514 when: ( 1 ) FHFA receives notice that the debt has been waived or otherwise found not to be owing to the Federal Government; or
( 2 ) An administrative or judicial order directs FHFA to make a refund.
( b ) Unless required by law or contract, refunds under this section shall not bear interest.