alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MAC - 3.31.2015- Exhibit 10.1 ESPP Amendment


Exhibit 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
THE MACERICH COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


WHEREAS, The Macerich Company (the “Company”) has established and maintains The Macerich Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan originally, originally effective April 1, 2003 and amended and restated effective June 1, 2013 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, Section 19(d) of the Plan authorizes the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan and, at the recommendation of the Plan Committee, the Board of Directors desires to amend the contribution and purchase limitations under the Plan to clarify and simplify the administration of participation elections consistent with the intent and purpose of the Plan; 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective October 23, 2014 as follows:


Section 1 is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end of that paragraph: “The Plan and all offerings and Options hereunder are intended to, and shall be interpreted in all respects to, comply with Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and authorities promulgated thereunder.”


Section 2 is hereby amended to replace the definition of “Exercise Date” in its entirety with the following:


“Exercise Date” means, with respect to an Offering Period, the last day of that Offering Period, provided that if the last day of the Offering Period falls on a weekend or holiday, the Exercise Date shall be the first business day of the Company following such date.  


Section 2 is hereby amended to delete the definition of “Individual Limit.”


Section 4(b) is hereby deleted in its entirety and subparagraph 4(c) is renumbered subparagraph 4(b). 


Section 6(b) is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:


(b)   Contribution Limits.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant may not elect to contribute more than the lesser of fifteen percent (15%), or twenty-six thousand dollars ($26,000), of his or her Compensation for Offering Periods ending in any one calendar year.  The Committee may establish further limitations, rules and procedures regarding Plan Contributions, in its complete and sole discretion.



1





The introductory clause of Section 8(c)(2) is hereby amended to provide, “Notwithstanding anything else contained herein, no Option shall be granted under this Plan to the extent:”


Section 8(c)(2) is hereby deleted in its entirety and subparagraph 8(3) is renumbered subparagraph 8(2).


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers as of October 23, 2014.


THE MACERICH COMPANY:


By           /s/ Thomas J. Leanse            
Title    Senior Executive Vice President, 
               Chief Legal Officer & Secretary 







2
Editorial Note on Part 220
Editorial Note: A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

§ 220.9 Clearance of securities, options, and futures. ( a ) *Credit for clearance of securities.* The provisions of this part shall not apply to the extension or maintenance of any credit that is not for more than one day if it is incidental to the clearance of transactions in securities directly between members of a national securities exchange or association or through any clearing agency registered with the SEC.
( b ) *Deposit of securities with a clearing agency.* The provisions of this part shall not apply to the deposit of securities with an option or futures clearing agency for the purpose of meeting the deposit requirements of the agency if: ( 1 ) The clearing agency: ( i ) Issues, guarantees performance on, or clears transactions in, any security (including options on any security, certificate of deposit, securities index or foreign currency); or
( ii ) Guarantees performance of contracts for the purchase or sale of a commodity for future delivery or options on such contracts;
( 2 ) The clearing agency is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or is the clearing agency for a contract market regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; and
( 3 ) The deposit consists of any margin security and complies with the rules of the clearing agency that have been approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
[Reg. T, 63 FR 2826, Jan. 16, 1998]
Edits on the Preamble, Chapter 5, 7 

 12/16/2011 12:23 PM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

 

Attached are comments on the preamble. Also see comments received on 

chapters 5 and 7 below. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

Chapter 5: 

Please make the language on page 5-100 and 5-101 of Chapter 5 of the RIA 

track better with the Exec Summary page E-4. 

 

 

Chapter 7: 

On page 7-60, move the text in the comment box to the main text. 

 

 

Pg. 7-33: The EPA has determined that this final rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects 

on minority, low income, or indigenous populations because it increases 

the level of environmental protection for all affected populations. 

without having any disproportionately high and adverse human health or 

environmental effects on any population, including any minority, low 

income, or indigenous populations. 

Pg. 7-34: Together, these rules and actions will have substantial and 

long-term effects on both the U.S. power industry and on communities 

currently breathing dirty air. Therefore, we anticipate significant 

interest in many, if not most, of these actions from EJ communities, as 

well as among many others. 

 

Pg. 7-37: This was true both for the counties estimated to have the 

highest concentrations. In summary, the analysis indicates that in 2005, 

educational status, living in one of the poorest counties, and living in 

a 

high-risk county are associated with higher estimated PM2.5 

concentrations, and thus are predicted to have mortality risk that those 

living in other areas do not have. As similar pattern was not observed 

for race is not. 

 

Our analysis predicts that that this final rule will likely significantly 

reduce the PM2.5 mortality among all populations of different races 

living 

throughout the U.S. compared to both 2005 and 2016 pre-rule (i.e., base 

case) levels. The analysis indicates that people living in counties with 
the highest concentrations of PM2.5 (top 5 percent) of PM 2.5 in 2005 

receive the largest reduction in concentrations of PM, thus are predicted 

to have the largest county-level reductions in premature mortality risk 

after this rule takes effect. We also estimate that people living in the 

poorest 5 percent of the counties will experience a larger reduction in 

exposure to PM2.5, thus these counties are predicted to have a a greater 

reduction in mortality risk when compared with all other counties. More 

information can be found below in section 7.11.3. 

EO12866NESHAPMACT_NSPSforUtilitiesMATS2060_AP52Final20111215_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563.

docx
# Official Journal C 302A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.302.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 302A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 539 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.302.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 302A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 539 November 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 302A/01 | Vacancy notice — Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — Bilbao (Spain) (COM/2010/10285) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 302A/01

Vacancy notice — Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — Bilbao (Spain) (COM/2010/10285)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 147 | (FI) |
| 149 | (IT) |
| 150 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | (PL) |
| 157 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 171 | (IT) |
| 178 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 184 | |
| 188 | (DA/DE/EN/FR/SL) |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 196 | (BG/EN/NL/RO/SL) |
| 201 | |
| 204 | (EN/FR) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | (EN/FR) |
| 236 | |
| 238 | |
| 242 | (BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL) |
| 248 | (DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO) |
| 249 | |
| 253 | |
| 254 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 256 | (RO) |
| 257 | (CS/PL) |
| 261 | |
| 262 | |
| 265 | |
| 266 | (RO) |
| 269 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 278 | |
| 285 | (EN/ES/FR/NL) |
| 286 | (HU) |
| 287 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 292 | |
| 296 | |
| 297 | (EL/ES/NL/PT) |
| 298 | (PL) |
| 299 | (RO) |
| 300 | (BG) |
| 302 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(DA/FI/MT)

147

(FI)

149

(IT)

150

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

151

155

156

(PL)

157

163

164

171

(IT)

178

(DE/EN/FR)

184

188

(DA/DE/EN/FR/SL)

190

191

192

(DE/EN/FR)

196

(BG/EN/NL/RO/SL)

201

204

(EN/FR)

219

227

(EN/FR)

236

238

242

(BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL)

248

(DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO)

249

253

254

(DE/EN/FR)

256

(RO)

257

(CS/PL)

261

262

265

266

(RO)

269

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

278

285

(EN/ES/FR/NL)

286

(HU)

287

(DE/EN/FR)

289

290

292

296

297

(EL/ES/NL/PT)

298

(PL)

299

(RO)

300

(BG)

302

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FEB-06-2008 i•:29

SOLVAY

SOLEXIS,

[NC 856 85• 6405

P.OI

FROM
Total Pages including

cover:

Z CON•ibl:NTIAL -• Info Requested Fi For Your Information [] Will call to discuss

[] Hard copy to follow by mail

OJ3 I Lo l 0 7S-

6D- I Solvay

Solexis,

Inc.The NewStandard inFluorochemistry

SOLEF® HALAR® ECTFE HYLAR • PVDF HYLAR 5000® PVDF HYFLON® MFA/PFA ALGOFLON® PTFE POLYMIST® PTFE TECNOFLON® FOMBLINe PFPE FLUOROLINK®PFPE GALDEN® PFPE H-GALDEN®HFPE VATAR ®
Visit us at our website: www.solvaysolexis.com OR emaih solvaysolexisinfo@solvay.com
Tel: 856-853.8119 Main Fax: 856-853-6405 Sales Fax: 856-384-6126FEB-06-2008 16:29

SOLUAY

SOLEXIS,

INC 856 853 6405

P.02

Chemical. Ident•ty: Specific:
• P99-4_•_•_Q•:

[Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C• fraction][CAS

RN 274917-93-0] P99-I_409: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxYlated, C 4 fraction][CAS

RN 274917-94-1] p99-14•9: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, Cs fraction][CAS •N 274917-95-2] [Ethene, tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C 6 fraction][CAS RN 274917-96-3] P99-1412: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarbox•lated, C• fraction][CAS RN 274917-97-4] P99-141•: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-,oxidlzed, polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C• fractlon][CAS RN 274918-01-3] P99•1414: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-,oxidized, polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C9 fraction][CAS

RN 274918-02-4] P99-1415: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C•0 fraction][CAS

RN 274918-03-5] P99-1416: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C11 fraction][CAS RN 274918-09-1] P99-I•17: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C•a fraction][CAS RN 274918-10-4] P99-1418: [Ethene,

tetrafluoro-, oxidized,

polymd.,

reduced, decarboxylated, C• fraction][CAS RN 274918-12-6] Generic: Halogenated

alkyl

ether

oligomers.

TOTAL P. 02
# C_2005253EN.01000601.xml

| 13.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/6

---

COMPOSITION OF THE EFTA COURT

COMPOSITION OF THE EFTA COURT

(2005/C 253/07)

Appointment of the Registrar of the EFTA Court

Mr Henning Harborg was appointed Registrar of the EFTA Court pursuant to Article 9, Protocol 5 of the ESA/Court Agreement for the period from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2007, to succeed Mr Lucien Dedichen. At a public sitting of the EFTA Court of 28 September 2004, Mr Henning Harborg took the oath prescribed in Article 10, Protocol 5 of the ESA/Court Agreement.

---
§ 211.45 Accounting for fees on international loans. ( a ) *Restrictions on fees for restructured international loans.* No banking institution shall charge, in connection with the restructuring of an international loan, any fee exceeding the administrative cost of the restructuring unless it amortizes the amount of the fee exceeding the administrative cost over the effective life of the loan.
( b ) *Accounting treatment.* Subject to paragraph (a) of this section, banking institutions shall account for fees on international loans in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
[Reg. K, 68 FR 1159, Jan. 9, 2003]
### Patrick MacAllister Date: 6/23/15

DBA, Aerial Optics Exemption No. 11430 P.O Box 26 Regulatory Docket No. FAA – 2015 – 0170 Humarock MA 02047 (781)588 - 3259 Patrick@aerialoptics.net U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 To w ho it may concern, Patrick MacAllister DBA, Aerial Optics would like to a dd 11 UAS to our existing exemption , Exe mption No. 11430, Regulatory Docket No. FAA – 2015 – 01 70. Ten are UAS/Rotorcraft and one is an UAS / Fixed wing . All added UAS fall within the FAA section 333 UAS specifications. Aerial Optics is requesting the ability to operate the UAS listed below. All UAS Aerial Optics operates will have equal or better safety features than our current UAS. When operating new and existing UAS Aerial Optics will strictly adhere to our existing operating procedures stated in our exemption # 11430 . The 4 UAS listed below have been approved for use in other section 333 exemptions. DJI Inspire1 - This UAS has been approved in e xemption # 11398 DJI S1000 - This UAS has been approved in e xemption # 11416 DJI S900 - This UAS has been approved in e xemption # 11401 3DRobotics IRIS+ - This UAS has been approved in e xemption # 11419 The 7 UAS listed below have not yet been approved in existing section 333 exemptions. UAS information is available with the provided links : DJI Phantom 3 - http://www.dji.com/product/phantom
- 3 DJI Matri ce 100 - http://dev.dji.com/en/products/flying
- platforms/matrice
- 100 Yuneec Tornado H920 - http://www.yuneec.com/products/aerialuav/h920.html Yuneec Typhoon Q500 - http://www.yuneec.com/products/AerialUAV/typhoon
- q500 - plus.html senseFly eXom - https://www.sensefly.com/drones/exom.html senseFly eBee - https://www.sensefly.com/drones/ebee.html Tayzu Robotics Titan X8 - http://tayzu.com/tayzu
- x8 - drone.html Thank you, Patrick L MacAllister, D.B.A Aerial Optics
# C_2023155EN.01000101.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 155/01)

Last publication

OJ C 134, 17.4.2023

Past publications

OJ C 127, 11.4.2023

OJ C 121, 3.4.2023

OJ C 112, 27.3.2023

OJ C 104, 20.3.2023

OJ C 94, 13.3.2023

OJ C 83, 6.3.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2008297EN.01001501.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/15

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2008/C 297/09)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority proposed appropriate measures concerning the State Aid Guidelines on aid for environmental protection, referred to in the following. The appropriate measures were accepted by Iceland.

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 16 July 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Title of the decision: | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision amending, for the sixty-fifth time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new chapter on State aid for environmental protection |
| Decision number: | 500/08/COL |
| EFTA State: | Iceland |
| Acceptance of appropriate measures: | 18 July 2008 |
| Legal basis: | Article 61(1) and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Duration: | 31 December 2014 |

Date of adoption of the decision:

Date of adoption of the decision:

16 July 2008

Title of the decision:

Title of the decision:

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision amending, for the sixty-fifth time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new chapter on State aid for environmental protection

Decision number:

Decision number:

500/08/COL

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Iceland

Acceptance of appropriate measures:

Acceptance of appropriate measures:

18 July 2008

Legal basis:

Legal basis:

Article 61(1) and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Duration:

Duration:

31 December 2014

---
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Judgment of the Court of 17 December 2010 in Case E-5/10 — Dr Joachim Kottke v Präsidial Anstalt and Sweetyle Stiftung (Security for costs before national courts — Discrimination — Article 4 EEA — Justification) **

*
Official Journal C 148 , 19/05/2011 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Judgment of the Court

of 17 December 2010

in Case E-5/10

Dr Joachim Kottke v Präsidial Anstalt and Sweetyle Stiftung

(Security for costs before national courts — Discrimination — Article 4 EEA — Justification)

2011/C 148/06

In Case E-5/10 between Dr Joachim Kottke and Präsidial Anstalt and Sweetyle Stiftung — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Fürstliches Obergericht (Princely Court of Appeal), Liechtenstein, concerning the interpretation of Article 4 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Thorgeir Örlygsson (Judge-Rapporteur) and Henrik Bull, Judges, gave judgment on 17 December 2010, the operative part of which is as follows:

1. A provision of national law pursuant to which non-resident plaintiffs in civil litigation must provide security for costs of court proceedings, while resident plaintiffs are not obliged to provide such security, entails indirect discrimination within the meaning of Article 4 EEA.

2. In order for such a discrimination to be justified on the basis of public interest objectives, the provision of national law must be necessary and not excessive in attaining them.

3. The latter condition is not met in cases where the State in which the plaintiff is resident allows for the enforcement of a costs award, whether on the basis of treaty obligations or unilaterally.

4. In other cases, too, provision of security may not be required in a manner disproportionately affecting the interests of a non-resident plaintiff in being able to commence legal proceedings. This means in particular that security may not be required for an amount which is out of proportion to the costs likely to be incurred by the defendant or unreasonably high or which must be posted within a very short period of time. The form of security required, the situation giving rise to its imposition and whether or not the plaintiff is entitled to legal aid also constitute important factors.

5. It is for the national court to determine in a particular case whether the conditions for justification are satisfied.

--------------------------------------------------
On March 2, 2015, the FAA received the following question from an individual via email:

When the proposed rules on unmanned aircraft systems (issued February 15, 2015) are finalized, will a

bank that takes a security interest in an unmanned aircraft system, be required to file their security

documents with the FAA? I could not see in the proposed rules that they affect the FAA’s regulation 14

CFR 49 (Recording of Aircraft Titles and Security Documents). Your assistance with my question is

greatly appreciated.

The FAA responded by stating that, under 14 C.F.R. 49.1(a)(1), part 49 applies “the recording of certain

conveyances affecting title to, or any interest in

... [a]ny aircraft registered under 49 U.S.C. 44101

‐

44104.” Since a small unmanned aircraft is an aircraft that, under the proposed rules, would be

registered with the FAA pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 44101

‐ 44104, part 49 would apply to small unmanned

aircraft in the same manner as a manned aircraft.