alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 208.45 Mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions under section 38. ( a ) *Mandatory supervisory actions* — ( 1 ) *Provisions applicable to all banks.* All member banks are subject to the restrictions contained in section 38(d) of the FDI Act on payment of capital distributions and management fees.
( 2 ) *Provisions applicable to undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized banks.* Immediately upon receiving notice or being deemed to have notice, as provided in § 208.42 or § 208.44, that the bank is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, the bank shall become subject to the provisions of section 38 of the FDI Act: ( i ) Restricting payment of capital distributions and management fees (section 38(d));
( ii ) Requiring that the Board monitor the condition of the bank (section 38(e)(1));
( iii ) Requiring submission of a capital restoration plan within the schedule established in this subpart (section 38(e)(2));
( iv ) Restricting the growth of the bank's assets (section 38(e)(3)); and
( v ) Requiring prior approval of certain expansion proposals (section 3(e)(4)).
( 3 ) *Additional provisions applicable to significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized banks.* In addition to the provisions of section 38 of the FDI Act described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, immediately upon receiving notice or being deemed to have notice, as provided in § 208.42 or § 208.44, that the bank is significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, or that the bank is subject to the provisions applicable to institutions that are significantly undercapitalized because the bank failed to submit or implement in any material respect an acceptable capital restoration plan, the bank shall become subject to the provisions of section 38 of the FDI Act that restrict compensation paid to senior executive officers of the institution (section 38(f)(4)).
( 4 ) *Additional provisions applicable to critically undercapitalized banks.* In addition to the provisions of section 38 of the FDI Act described in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, immediately upon receiving notice or being deemed to have notice, as provided in § 208.32, that the bank is critically undercapitalized, the bank shall become subject to the provisions of section 38 of the FDI Act: ( i ) Restricting the activities of the bank (section 38(h)(1)); and
( ii ) Restricting payments on subordinated debt of the bank (section 38(h)(2)).
( b ) *Discretionary supervisory actions.* In taking any action under section 38 that is within the Board's discretion to take in connection with: A member bank that is deemed to be undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, or has been reclassified as undercapitalized, or significantly undercapitalized; an officer or director of such bank; or a company that controls such bank, the Board shall follow the procedures for issuing directives under 12 CFR 263.202 and 263.204, unless otherwise provided in section 38 or this subpart.
# C_2018027EN.01002101.xml

| 25.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

of 11 October 2017

in Case E-14/11 COSTS

Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Taxation of costs — Recoverable costs — Default interest)

(Taxation of costs — Recoverable costs — Default interest)

(2018/C 27/08)

In Case E-14/11 COSTS, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for the taxation of costs awarded by the Court in its judgment of 21 December 2012 in Case E-14/11 Schenker North and Others v ESA [2012] EFTA Ct. Rep. 1178, the Court, composed of, Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Ása Ólafsdóttir (ad hoc), Judges, gave order of 11 October 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

Schenker North and Others

ESA

| 1. | The total remaining costs to be paid by ESA to the applicants are fixed at EUR 95 944. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The total remaining costs to be paid by ESA to the applicants are fixed at EUR 95 944.

| 2. | Default interest shall be due on the amount from the date of notification of the present order until the date of payment; the applicable interest rate shall be calculated on the basis of the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations in force on the first calendar day of the month in which payment is due, increased by three and a half percentage points. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Default interest shall be due on the amount from the date of notification of the present order until the date of payment; the applicable interest rate shall be calculated on the basis of the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations in force on the first calendar day of the month in which payment is due, increased by three and a half percentage points.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51578-51579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. AC09-179-000, AC09-179-001]


XTO Energy Inc.; Notice of Filing

September 30, 2009.
    Take notice that on September 4, 2009, and September 17, 2009, XTO 
Energy Inc. submitted requests for the waiver of the requirement to 
file the FERC Form No. 6 from December 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as

[[Page 51579]]

appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or 
before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not 
necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other 
than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2f4f7e0f1fddcdedbdcd7e1c7c2c2ddc0c6f2d4d7c0d19cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: October 30, 2009.

Kimberly Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24127 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1805.501 Comparability of form and value. ( a ) Matching funds shall be at least comparable in form (*e.g.,* equity investments, deposits, credit union shares, loans and grants) and value to financial assistance provided by the CDFI Fund (except as provided in § 1805.502). The CDFI Fund shall have the discretion to determine whether matching funds pledged are comparable in form and value to the financial assistance requested.
( b ) In the case of a Recipient that raises matching funds from more than one source, through different investment instruments, or under varying terms and conditions, the CDFI Fund may provide financial assistance in a manner that represents the combined characteristics of such instruments.
( c ) A Recipient may meet all or part of its matching requirements by committing available earnings retained from its operations.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005
                                              /s/ Josephine Chaus
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Josephine Chaus
                                              Chairwoman of the Board and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
```
fpi_Ex10_4


		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
		

		
			CONSULTING AGREEMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of April 16, 2015 by and between Farmland Partners Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Jesse J. Hough, an individual (the “Consultant”).
		

		
			W I T N E S S E T H:
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant entered into the Consulting Agreement, dated April 16, 2014, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Agreement”); and 
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to increase Consultant’s compensation in accordance with a resolution taken by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 25, 2015.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained and other valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, covenant and agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			DEFINED TERMS.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning or meanings given to such terms in the Agreement. 




			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			FEES.  Section 2.2 of the Agreement hereby is amended to increase the Annual Fee for the second year of the Initial Term to $125,000. 




			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Agreement Remains in Effect.  Except as provided herein, all provisions, terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. As amended hereby, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects.




		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						Chief Financial Officer

					
						 

					
						 

					
					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

				
	
					
						COMPANY:

					
						 

					
						Farmland Partners Inc.

					
						 

					
						By: /s/ Luca Fabbri                             .

					
						Name: Luca Fabbri

					
						Its:Chief Financial Officer

					
						 

					
					
						CONSULTANT:

					
						 

					
						Jesse J. Hough

					
						 

					
						By: /s/ Jesse J. Hough                         .
<Page>


                                  Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, E. Paul Leishman, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
News Communications, Inc (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/   E. Paul Leishman
----------------------------------
Name: E. Paul Leishman
Date: May 20, 2003


                                       18
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARA LOWRY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-56141

D.C. No. 

3:11-cv-00946-MMA-WMC

Southern District of California, 

San Diego

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

FILED

SEP 16 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60397

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE DOLORES GALDAMEZ,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A73-721-220

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Jose Dolores Galdamez petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from

the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum

and for a withholding of deportation. He argues that the Board

erred by determining that he did not have a well-founded fear of

future persecution by the guerillas in El Salvador. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s

decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-
Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition

for review is DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0683 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LYNDSEY LALICKER ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 2 9, 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 23 2020

03/23/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0683
AFS-11-250-E April 22, 2011

Exemption No. 10178A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1012

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk

President/Chief Executive Officer Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 1210 Watergut Christianstead, VI 00820

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10178. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 31, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10178. That exemption from § 121.305(j) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to conduct domestic, flag, and supplemental operations in the islands of the Caribbean without installing a third gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10178 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10178 to November 30, 2011 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
§ 1408.3 Definitions. In this part (except where the term is defined elsewhere in this part), the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) Administrative offset or offset, as defined in 31 U.S.C. 3701(a)(1), means withholding money payable by the United States Government to, or held by the Government for, a person to satisfy a debt the person owes the Government.
( b ) *Agency* means a department, agency, or instrumentality in the executive or legislative branch of the Government.
( c ) Claim or debt means money or property owed by a person or entity to an agency of the Federal Government. A “claim” or “debt” includes amounts due the Government from loans insured by or guaranteed by the United States and all other amounts due from fees, leases, rents, royalties, services, sales of real or personal property, overpayment, penalties, damages, interest, and fines.
( d ) *Claim certification* means a creditor agency's written request to a paying agency to effect an administrative offset.
( e ) *Corporation* means the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.
( f ) *Creditor agency* means an agency to which a claim or debt is owed.
( g ) *Debtor* means the person or entity owing money to the Federal Government.
( h ) *Hearing official* means an individual who is responsible for reviewing a claim under § 1408.10.
( i ) *Paying agency* means an agency of the Federal Government owing money to a debtor against which an administrative or salary offset can be effected.
( j ) *Salary offset* means an administrative offset to collect a debt under 5 U.S.C. 5514 by deductions at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of a debtor.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                     

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add International Business Reply Service Contracts to the Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642. 

# DATES:

February 5, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret M. Falwell, 703-292-3576. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that it has filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of United States Postal Service To Add International Business Reply Service Contracts to the Competitive Products List, and Notice of Filing Contract (Under Seal) Contract and Enabling Governors' Decision. Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2009-14 and CP2009-20.                

Neva R. Watson, 

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. E9-2420 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 211.33 Investments and extensions of credit. ( a ) *Amount of investments.* In accordance with the procedures of § 211.34, an eligible investor may invest no more than 5 percent of its consolidated capital and surplus in one or more export trading companies, except that an Edge or agreement corporation not engaged in banking may invest as much as 25 percent of its consolidated capital and surplus but no more than 5 percent of the consolidated capital and surplus of its parent bank holding company.
( b ) *Extensions of credit* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* An eligible investor in an export trading company or companies may extend credit directly or indirectly to the export trading company or companies in a total amount that at no time exceeds 10 percent of the investor's consolidated capital and surplus.
( 2 ) *Terms.* ( i ) An eligible investor in an export trading company may not extend credit directly or indirectly to the export trading company or any of its customers or to any other investor holding 10 percent or more of the shares of the export trading company on terms more favorable than those afforded similar borrowers in similar circumstances, and such extensions of credit shall not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
( ii ) For the purposes of this section, an investor in an export trading company includes any affiliate of the investor.
( 3 ) *Collateral requirements.* Covered transactions between a bank and an affiliated export trading company in which a bank holding company has invested pursuant to this subpart are subject to the collateral requirements of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 371c), except where a bank issues a letter of credit or advances funds to an affiliated export trading company solely to finance the purchase of goods for which: ( i ) The export trading company has a bona fide contract for the subsequent sale of the goods; and
( ii ) The bank has a security interest in the goods or in the proceeds from their sale at least equal in value to the letter of credit or the advance.