alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1669

MELBA BARTON; MONIQUE BARTON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

KENNETH THOMPSON; CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL,

INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn; MANOR CARE,

INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-2154-HAR)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick James O'Guinn, Sr., Sherae Monique McNeal, O'GUINN &

MCNEAL, Columbia, Maryland; Charles Jerome Ware, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellants. Kenneth Thompson, Havre de Grace, Maryland;

Mark D. Laponsky, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Melba and Monique Barton appeal the district court's orders

granting the Appellees' summary judgment in this civil action. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Barton v. Thompson, No. CA-95-2154-HAR (D. Md. May

6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022423EN.01001001.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 November 2022

(2022/C 423/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9872 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4419 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87478 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8538 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9863 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2019 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,422 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 401,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6825 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8893 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3845 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5311 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3351 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,7493 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6769 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3891 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 397,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7983 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0894 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5353 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 491,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6872 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,672 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,906 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,9682 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,2611 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9872

JPY

Japanese yen

145,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4419

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87478

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8538

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9863

ISK

Iceland króna

145,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2019

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,422

HUF

Hungarian forint

401,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6825

RON

Romanian leu

4,8893

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3845

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5311

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3351

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,7493

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6769

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3891

KRW

South Korean won

1 397,70

ZAR

South African rand

17,7983

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0894

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5353

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 491,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6872

PHP

Philippine peso

57,672

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,906

BRL

Brazilian real

4,9682

MXN

Mexican peso

19,2611

INR

Indian rupee

81,0200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000899281
<NAME> SITHE/INDEPENDENCE FUNDING CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,237
<PP&E>                                         782,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                (96,604)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 813,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,414
<BONDS>                                        622,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   813,469
<SALES>                                        382,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,084
<CGS>                                          310,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,503
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        3,775
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,278
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
May 9, 1980.

427 A.2d 241

#### Wallace et al. v. Septa et al. Bowens v. Septa et al. Davis v. Septa et al. Appeal of Septa.

Reargument Denied Aug. 19, 1980.

Argued June 25, 1979.

Norman Hegge, Jr., for appellant; Morrie N. Becker for Wallace et al., appellees (at No. 1647).

Phillip M. Gilligan, for Wallace, appellee (at Nos. 1647, 1648 and 1649).

Drew S. Doreman, for Bowens, appellee (at No. 1648),

Albert M. Hankin, for Davis, appellee (at No. 1649).

Before WIEAND, ROBINSON and LOUIK, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation. President Judge Otto P. Robinson of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawan-na County, Pennsylvania, and Judge Maurice Louik of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

This decision was reached following the death of Robinson, J.

Judgments affirmed.

WIEAND, J., filed a memorandum concurring statement.
#### § 79.60 Fee prohibition.

Grantees must not charge a fee to participants for providing legal services that are funded with amounts from a legal services grant under this part.
§ 1261.24 Board meetings. ( a ) *Number of meetings.* The board of directors of each Bank shall hold as many meetings each year as necessary and appropriate to carry out its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the effective oversight of Bank management and such other duties and obligations as may be imposed by applicable laws, provided the board of directors of a Bank must hold a minimum of six in-person meetings in any year.
( b ) *Site of meetings.* The bank usually should hold board of director and committee meetings within the district served by the Bank. The Bank shall not hold board of director or committee meetings in any location that is not within the United States, including its possessions and territories.
§ 1808.304 Eligible uses of Bond Loan proceeds. ( a ) *Eligible uses.* Bond Loan proceeds shall be only used for Eligible Purposes, to prefund one monthly installment of Bond Loan payments, and to pay Bond Issuance Fees. As a Bond Loan is repaid, such repaid Bond Loan proceeds must be held in the Relending Account and used for additional Secondary Loans, to the extent authorized under § 1808.308.
( b ) *Bond Issuance Fees.* ( 1 ) Amounts not to exceed one percent of Bond Loan proceeds may be applied to pay Bond Issuance Fees. Bond Loan proceeds that are used to pay Bond Issuance Fees shall be applied in the following order of priority: ( i ) To pay reasonable transaction fees and expenses of the Qualified Issuer, its advisors and consultants, related to the Bond issuance (but not including any salaries or administrative costs of the Qualified Issuer unrelated to the Bond issuance);
( ii ) To pay reasonable transaction fees and expenses of the Master Servicer/Trustee, its advisors and consultants, related to the Bond issuance; and
( iii ) To pay reasonable transaction fees and expenses of the Eligible CDFI, its advisors and consultants, related to the making of the Bond Loan.
( 2 ) Any fees and expenses arising out of each transaction which, in the aggregate, exceed the one percent limit on Bond Issuance Fees payable from Bond Loan proceeds must be paid by the Eligible CDFI from monies other than Bond Loan proceeds.
( c ) *Prefunding of Bond Loan payments.* Bond Loan proceeds may be used to prefund one monthly installment of Bond Loan payments.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JONAS TRAMELL GRIFFIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D15-5190

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 2, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judge.

Michael J. P. Baker, Cape Coral, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**Addendum B N** **2 PATENTS (As of** **June 15, 2009 )**  United States **Patents**  U.S. Patent No. 7,028,782 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires”  U.S. Patent No. 6,016,874“Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System”  U.S. Patent No. 6,257,341“Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System”  U.S. Patent No. 7,455,120 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires” **Patent Applications**  U.S. PatentApplicationSerial No. 12/256,841 (ContinuationofUS Patent No. 7,455,120)  U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/878,999 “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” Japan **Patent Applications**  Japanese Patent Application Serial No. JP2001-559550 “Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System”  Japanese Patent Application Serial No. JP2005-509652 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires”  Japanese Patent Application Serial No. <NOT AVAILABLE> “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed June 10, 2009 as National phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) Europe **Patents**  European Patent No. 1,251,910 “Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System” – validations completed in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom **Patent Applications**  European Patent Application Serial No. EP 03753190.2 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires”  European PatentApplication Serial No. EP 07855516.6“SodiumAzide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed June 9, 2009 as Regional phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) NOTE: Hong Kong protection for this invention to be applied for through prosecution ofthis EPO application, at appropriate date. Australian **Patents**  Australian Patent No. 768429 “Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System” **Patent Applications**  Australian Patent Application Serial No. <Not Available> “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed May 26, 2009 as National phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) Canadian **Patent**  Canadian Patent No. 2,398,019 “Compact Affordable Inert Gas Fire Extinguishing System” (Issued July 22, 2008)**Patent Application**  Canadian Patent Application No. 2,499,963 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires”  Canadian Patent Application No. <Not Available> “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed May 27, 2009 as National phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) Chinese **Patent Applications**  Chinese Patent Application No. 03823073.9 “System and Method For SuppressingFires”  Hong Kong Patent Application No. 06100616.8 “System and Method For Suppressing Fires”  Chinese Patent Application No. <Not Available> “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed June 11, 2009 as National phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) Indian **Paten t Applications**   Indian Patent Application No. <Not Available> “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires” (Filed June 1, 2009 as National phase of PCT/CA2007/002234) PCT  PCT Patent Application No. PCT/CA2007/002234 “Sodium Azide Based Suppression of Fires”
§ 210.45 Payment orders. ( a ) *Rejection.* A sender shall not send a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank unless authorized to do so by the Federal Reserve Bank. A Federal Reserve Bank may reject, or impose conditions that must be satisfied before it will accept, a payment order for any reason.
( b ) *Selection of an intermediary bank.* For an interdistrict transfer through the FedNow Service, a Federal Reserve Bank is authorized and directed to execute a payment order through another Federal Reserve Bank. A sender shall not send a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank that requires the Federal Reserve Bank to send a payment order to an intermediary bank (other than a Federal Reserve Bank). A sender shall not send to a Federal Reserve Bank a payment order through the FedNow Service that instructs use by a Federal Reserve Bank of a funds-transfer system or means of transmission other than the FedNow Service, unless the Federal Reserve Bank agrees with the sender in writing to follow such instructions.
( c ) *Execution date and payment date.* A sender shall not issue a payment order through the FedNow Service that instructs a Federal Reserve Bank to execute the payment order or to pay the beneficiary on a FedNow funds-transfer business day that is later than the funds-transfer business day on which the order is received by the Federal Reserve Bank, unless the Federal Reserve Bank agrees with the sender in writing to follow such instructions.
§ 13.220 Fiduciary fees. ( a ) *Authority.* The Hub Manager with jurisdiction over a fiduciary appointment may determine whether a fee is necessary to obtain the services of a fiduciary. A fee is necessary only if no other person or entity is qualified and willing to serve without a fee and the beneficiary's interests would be served by the appointment of a qualified paid fiduciary. The Hub Manager will not authorize a fee if the fiduciary: ( 1 ) Is a spouse, dependent, or other relative of the beneficiary; or
( 2 ) Will receive any other form of payment in connection with providing fiduciary services for the beneficiary.
( b ) *Limitation on fees.* The Hub Manager will authorize a fiduciary to whom a fee is payable under paragraph (a) of this section to deduct from the beneficiary's account a reasonable monthly fee for fiduciary services rendered. ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, *reasonable monthly fee* means a monetary amount that is authorized by the Hub Manager and does not exceed 4 percent of the monthly VA benefit paid to the fiduciary on behalf of the beneficiary for a month in which the fiduciary is eligible under paragraph (b)(2) of this section to collect a fee.
( 2 ) A monthly fee may be collected for any month during which the fiduciary: ( i ) Provides fiduciary services on behalf of the beneficiary,
( ii ) Receives a recurring VA benefit payment for the beneficiary, and
( iii ) Is authorized by the Hub Manager to receive a fee for fiduciary services.
( 3 ) Fees may not be computed based upon: ( i ) Any one-time, retroactive, or lump-sum payment made to the fiduciary on behalf of the beneficiary;
( ii ) Any funds conserved by the fiduciary for the beneficiary in the beneficiary's account under § 13.200 or invested by the fiduciary for the beneficiary under § 13.210, to include any interest income and return on investment derived from any account; or
( iii ) Any funds transferred to the fiduciary by a prior fiduciary for the beneficiary, or from the personal funds of patients or any other source.
( 4 ) The Hub Manager will not authorize a fee for any month for which: ( i ) VA or a court with jurisdiction determines that the fiduciary misused or misappropriated benefits, or
( ii ) The beneficiary does not receive a VA benefit payment. However, the Hub Manager may authorize a fee for a month in which the beneficiary did not receive a benefit payment if VA later issues benefits for that month and the fiduciary: ( A ) Receives VA approval to collect a fee for the month for which payment was made,
( B ) Provided fiduciary services during the month for which payment was made, and
( C ) Was the beneficiary's fiduciary when VA made the retroactive payment.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5502, 6101, 6106)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      4,062,700
<SECURITIES>                               14,960,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19,113,500
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19,126,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      15,006,800
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,119,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               19,126,400
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              290,900
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               276,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           276,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  276,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.46


</TABLE>
Home1998 Treaties and Agreements...Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (98-1126) – Defense Agreement for the Provision of Services for Counter-Drug Purposes

# 									Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (98-1126) – Defense Agreement for the Provision of Services for Counter-Drug Purposes							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 26, 1998

Defense

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Bridgetown and Kingstown November 13 and 26, 1998; entered into force November 26, 1998.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

CrimeDefenseDefense ArticlesDrug TraffickingSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
# C_2022115EN.01001501.xml

| 11.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 March 2022

(2022/C 115/08)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1084 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4401 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84175 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7073 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0270 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,316 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 381,63 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8239 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9491 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,5740 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5109 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4189 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6688 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6185 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5058 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 360,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7264 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0063 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 824,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6414 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,825 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,710 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5958 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3153 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6070 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1084

JPY

Japanese yen

128,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4401

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84175

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7073

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0270

ISK

Iceland króna

145,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,316

HUF

Hungarian forint

381,63

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8239

RON

Romanian leu

4,9491

TRY

Turkish lira

16,5740

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5109

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4189

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6688

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6185

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5058

KRW

South Korean won

1 360,48

ZAR

South African rand

16,7264

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0063

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 824,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6414

PHP

Philippine peso

57,825

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,710

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5958

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3153

INR

Indian rupee

84,6070

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1291.65 Transfer of Program administration.

Without limitation on other remedies, FHFA, upon determining that a Bank has engaged in mismanagement of its Program, may designate another Bank to administer all or a portion of the first Bank's annual AHP contribution, for the benefit of the first Bank's members, under such terms and conditions as FHFA may prescribe.