alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1
<CURRENCY>             U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                4,907,311
<SECURITIES>                          6,220,455
<RECEIVABLES>                         4,030,483
<ALLOWANCES>                            140,395
<INVENTORY>                             210,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     16,682,570
<PP&E>                                7,808,182
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,942,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       25,345,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                10,669,397
<BONDS>                               3,970,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 43,844
<OTHER-SE>                            9,952,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         25,345,252
<SALES>                              18,661,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     18,661,544
<CGS>                                 2,566,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        12,204,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      5,735,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (80,066)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,446,892
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,673,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,773,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,773,892
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.51


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6244

DAVON JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EMILIO PAGAN, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-00108-FWB)

Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 31, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Davon Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Davon Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by

the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Sao Tome and Principe

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Sao Tome and Principe			

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Sao Tome and Principe 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Sao Tome and Principe

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  However, actual revenues and expenditures did not reasonably correspond to those in the enacted budget, and the government did not publish a revised or supplemental budget.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available.  Public budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue, including natural resource revenues.  Budget documents were not prepared according to internationally accepted principles.  Military and intelligence budgets were subject to parliamentary oversight.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and its reports were not published within a reasonable period.  The government specified in law and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Sao Tome and Principe’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Producing and publicly issuing revised budget estimates or passing a supplementary budget when budget executions deviate significantly from projections;
- Preparing budget documents using internationally accepted principles;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and has sufficient resources; and
- Making audit reports widely and easily accessible to the public within a reasonable period.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Sao Tome and Principe 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSao Tome and Principe

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
E.O. 12866 Review 2060-AQ43 Email 013111_4.txt

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/31/2011 06:09 PM

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Concluded review of RIN 2060-AQ43

Hi Sharon, We have concluded review of RIN 2060-AQ43, Residual Risk and Technology Review: Primary Lead Smelting.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards, Cortney

Page 1
```

[House Report 106-491]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-491

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2005, THE WORKPLACE GOODS JOB 
                 GROWTH AND COMPETITIVENESS ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

  February 1, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 412]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 412, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2005, 
the Workplace Goods Job Growth and Competitiveness Act of 1999, 
under a modified open rule. The rule provides one hour of 
general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule makes in order the Committee on the Judiciary 
amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill 
as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, which shall 
be open for amendment at any point. The rule further makes in 
order only those amendments printed in the Congressional Record 
and pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record may be offered 
only by the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee, 
and each amendment shall be considered as read.
    The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to 
reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if 
the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule 
provides for one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.

                                  

```
# L_2008122EN.01003201.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/32

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES

No 1/2007/SC

of 25 October 2007

amending Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to Protocol 38a on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area, and amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the European Economic Area,

Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 5/2004/SC of 23 September 2004 establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism,

Having regard to the fact that Liechtenstein now is in the position to produce its own official data on Gross Domestic Product (GDP),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Paragraph 6 and 7 of the Annex to the Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism shall be replaced by the following:

| ‘6. | The GDP data on which the contributions for a specific year t are to be based, shall be delivered by 1 February of the same year and shall relate to the years t-4, t-3 and t-2. For Liechtenstein, the three most recent years for which data is available shall be used.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6.

Article 2

This Decision shall take immediate effect. It shall apply for the first time for the tranche 2007-2008.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2007.

For the Standing Committee

The Chairman

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

The Secretary-General

Kåre BRYN

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7008
AFNAN JEROME PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSUPERINTENDENT PROFFITT; MAJOR FRAZIER; LIEUTENANT ROESSNER; SERGEANT WHALEN; SERGEANT MCDANIELS; CORPORAL BREEDING; CORPORAL CRYSTAL; PRIVATE COLT; COUNSELOR JOHNSON; DOCTOR PASTERNACK; DOCTOR IRVING; SERGEANT MCCAFFERTY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR WILDER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-7009
AFNAN JEROME PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSUPERINTENDENT PROFFITT; MAJOR FRAZIER; LIEUTENANT ROESSNER; SERGEANT WHALEN; SERGEANT MCDANIELS; CORPORAL BREEDING; CORPORAL CRYSTAL; PRIVATE COLT; COUNSELOR JOHNSON; DOCTOR PASTERNACK; DOCTOR IRVING; SERGEANT MCCAFFERTY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR WILDER, Defendants - Appellees.23Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-815-R) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Afnan Jerome Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Loftis, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Afnan Jerome Parker appeals from the district court's orders (1) adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing all of the claims in his complaint except the Eighth Amendment claim, (2) entering judgment on the jury verdict against Parker on his Eighth Amendment claim, (3) denying his motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense, and (4) refusing, for lack of jurisdiction, to act on Parker's motion to amend or for a new trial and motion to produce transcripts and court documents. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees' motion todismiss for failure to prosecute, deny Parker's motions for appointment of counsel and for a new trial, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Proffitt , No. CA-94-815-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1996, and May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4255

___________ In re: Virginia P. Dale, * * Debtor, * _________________________ * * Virginia P. Dale, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. HomeQ Servicing Corporation; Betty * Veasey; Ken Thompson; Judy * [UNPUBLISHED] Brookman; Sandra Rodriguez- * Villalovoz; Jill Olsen; Michael P. * Gaughan; Jan Henryck; Kozeny & * McCubbin, L.C.; Amy Hope Davis, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 28, 2006 Filed: January 11, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Jerry W. Venters, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri.
2 This name appears as both “HomEq ” and “HomeQ” in the record. -2- Chapter 13 debtor, Virginia Dale, appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 judgment in favor of HomEq 2 Servicing Corp. (HSC) and num erous others associated with HSC whom Dale sued in an adversary proceeding to resci nd her home mortgage and obtain damages. Upon careful review of the parties’ s ubmissions on appeal, we conclude that Dale’s arguments either are not properly before us or fail to assert an adequate basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
§ 1070.63 Use and collection of Social Security numbers. The CFPB will ensure that employees authorized to collect information are aware: ( a ) That individuals may not be denied any right, benefit, or privilege as a result of refusing to provide their Social Security numbers, unless the collection is authorized either by a statute or by a regulation issued prior to 1975; and
( b ) That individuals requested to provide their Social Security numbers must be informed of: ( 1 ) Whether providing Social Security numbers is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) Any statutory or regulatory authority that authorizes the collection of Social Security numbers; and
( 3 ) The uses that will be made of the numbers.
# C_2023156EN.01002201.xml

| 3.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/22

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

3,50 % on 1 May 2023

Euro exchange rates (2)

2 May 2023

(2023/C 156/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0965 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 150,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87868 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2915 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9841 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,587 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 371,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5758 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9305 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,3508 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6371 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4885 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6075 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7654 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4646 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 470,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1460 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5791 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 143,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8948 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,712 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,478 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4853 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6703 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,7515 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0965

JPY

Japanese yen

150,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87868

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2915

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9841

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,587

HUF

Hungarian forint

371,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5758

RON

Romanian leu

4,9305

TRY

Turkish lira

21,3508

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6371

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4885

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6075

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7654

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4646

KRW

South Korean won

1 470,32

ZAR

South African rand

20,1460

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5791

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 143,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8948

PHP

Philippine peso

60,712

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,478

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4853

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6703

INR

Indian rupee

89,7515

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 150.460 Who may conduct an audit?

Internal auditors, external auditors, or other qualified persons who are responsible only to the board of directors, may conduct an audit.
In the Senate of the United States,

September 30, 2004.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2714) entitled ‘‘An Act to reauthorize the State

Justice Institute.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

1 Page 3, after line 5, insert:

2 SEC. 4. LAW ENFORCEMENT ARMOR VESTS.

3 Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime

4 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.

5 3793(a)(23)) is amended by striking ‘‘2004’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘2007’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2714

AMENDMENT
§ 1215.1 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This regulation sets forth the policies and procedures that must be followed in order to compel an employee of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to produce records or information, or to provide testimony relating to the employee's official duties, in the context of a legal proceeding. Parties seeking records, information, or testimony must comply with these requirements when submitting demands or requests:
( b ) FHFA intends these provisions to: ( 1 ) Promote economy and efficiency in its programs and operations;
( 2 ) Minimize the possibility of involving FHFA in controversial issues not related to its mission and functions;
( 3 ) Maintain FHFA's impartiality;
( 4 ) Protect employees from being compelled to serve as involuntary witnesses for wholly private interests, or as inappropriate expert witnesses regarding current law or the activities of FHFA; and
( 5 ) Protect sensitive, confidential information and FHFA's deliberative processes.
( c ) By providing these policies and procedures, FHFA does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.
( d ) This part provides guidance for FHFA's internal operations. This part does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, that a party may rely upon in any legal proceeding against the United States.
( e ) The production of records, information, or testimony pursuant to this part, does not constitute a waiver by FHFA of any privilege.
F i s h

C r e e k 

Ti ngm i ak si qv i k Ri v e r 

K i

k i a k r o r a k

R i v e r 

Ko g o s u k r u k

R i v e r 

Ju d y

Cr e e k 

Mi g uakiak R. 

C o l v i l l e 

Ikpikp

uk 

River 

R

i

v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

H a r r i s o n

B a y 

B e a u f o r t

S e a 

1 E 2 2 

9 

1 E 

11 

4 

1 S 

6 

9 N 

1 W 

A R C T I C O C E A N

Cape Simpson 

Pitt Point 

Sm ith Bay 

15 N 

4 3 2 1 W 12 11 10 8 7 6 5

Te she kpuk Lak e 

Kogru R. 14 

13 

12 

10 

3 4 5

1 W 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 

8 

7 

5 

3 

2 

1 N 

2 3 4

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 

2 

3 LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF LAKES AND PONDS 

4

Less than 1.6 Meters (about 5 Feet) Maximum Depth 

1.6 to 4.0 Meters (about 5 - 12 Feet) Maximum Depth 

5 Greater than 4.0 Meters (about 12 Feet) Maximum Depth 

0 6 12 6 18

Miles 

Source: USDOI and MMS 2003

Map 3-7. Locations and Depths of Lakes and Ponds in the Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska