alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EE EX_10.03 2015.03.31 FC PSA Amendment






EXHIBIT 10.03

April 13, 2015


El Paso Electric Company
Stanton Tower
100 North Stanton
El Paso, Texas 79901
Attention:    Rocky Miracle, Senior Vice President
of Corporate Planning and Development


Dear Mr. Miracle:


Reference is made to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 17, 2015 (the “Agreement”), between El Paso Electric Company, a Texas corporation (“Seller”), and Arizona Public Service Company, an Arizona corporation (“Purchaser”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter agreement have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.  Purchaser and Seller desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


1.    Seller’s Share of Underfunded/Overfunded Pension and OPEB Liabilities.  The first sentence of Section 1.1.67 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read:


““Seller’s Share of Underfunded/Overfunded Pension and OPEB Liabilities” means the adjusted product of (i) Pension and OPEB Liabilities at the Closing Date minus PNW Plan Assets as of the Closing Date, multiplied by (ii) the proportional share of Pension and OPEB Liabilities related to the Facilities as of the Closing Date as determined by the Operating Agent’s Actuary, multiplied by (iii) an allocation percentage of five and seven-hundredths percent (5.07%).”


Except as expressly set forth in this letter agreement, all terms and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.  In the event of a conflict between the terms of this letter agreement and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this letter agreement shall govern and control.


Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a signed counterpart of this letter agreement to me.






















DMWEST #12015979 v1







            












Very truly yours,


ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, 
an Arizona corporation




By:  /s/ David A. Hansen                                                   
Name: David A. Hansen
Title: Vice President, Fossil Generation




Accepted and agreed to:








EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY,
a Texas corporation






By:  /s/ Rocky Miracle                                                      
Name: Rocky Miracle 
Title: Senior Vice President of Corporate
 Planning and Development
Date: 15 APR 2015                                      




		
	cc:
	El Paso Electric Company


Stanton Tower
100 North Stanton
El Paso, Texas 79901 
Attention: General Counsel


Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Attention: Daniel G. Kelly












DMWEST #12015979 v1

2
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GTDATA CORPORATION
(the  "COMPANY"),  for  the  quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Robert Genesi, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,  do  hereby  certify,  to my knowledge that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert Genesi
--------------------------------------------
Robert  Genesi
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated:   November 19, 2004

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  GTDATA  CORPORATION and will be retained by GTDATA CORPORATION and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 217.45 Recognition of credit risk mitigants for securitization exposures. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) An originating Board-regulated institution that has obtained a credit risk mitigant to hedge its exposure to a synthetic or traditional securitization that satisfies the operational criteria provided in § 217.41 may recognize the credit risk mitigant under §§ 217.36 or 217.37, but only as provided in this section.
( 2 ) An investing Board-regulated institution that has obtained a credit risk mitigant to hedge a securitization exposure may recognize the credit risk mitigant under §§ 217.36 or 217.37, but only as provided in this section.
( b ) *Mismatches.* A Board-regulated institution must make any applicable adjustment to the protection amount of an eligible guarantee or credit derivative as required in § 217.36(d), (e), and (f) for any hedged securitization exposure. In the context of a synthetic securitization, when an eligible guarantee or eligible credit derivative covers multiple hedged exposures that have different residual maturities, the Board-regulated institution must use the longest residual maturity of any of the hedged exposures as the residual maturity of all hedged exposures.
EGU MACT RIA -- Interagency comments on Chapter 7

12/14/2011 04:31 PM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob,

Attached are interagency comments on the RIA Chapter 7.

Regards,

Cortney

Chapter 7_Interagencycomm entsunderEO13563.docx
§ 1777.26 Final notice of order. ( a ) *Determination and notice.* After the Enterprise has submitted its response under § 1777.25 or the response period (as extended or shortened, if applicable) has expired, whichever occurs first, OFHEO will determine, in its discretion, whether to take into consideration such relevant information as is provided by the Enterprise in its response, if any, under § 1777.25. OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with a written final notice of any order issued by OFHEO under this subpart, which is to include a description of the basis for OFHEO's determination.
( b ) *Termination or modification.* An Enterprise that has received an order under paragraph (a) of this section remains subject to each provision of the order until each such provision terminates under the express terms of the order. The Enterprise may submit a written request to OFHEO seeking modification or termination of one or more provisions of the order. Pending OFHEO's review and approval, in OFHEO's discretion of the Enterprise's request, the Enterprise shall remain subject to the provisions of the order.
( c ) *Enforcement of order* — ( 1 ) *Judicial enforcement.* An order issued under paragraph (a) of this section is an order for purposes of section 1375 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4635). An Enterprise in any capital classification may be subject to enforcement of such order in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to such section.
( 2 ) *Administrative enforcement.* An order issued under paragraph (a) of this section constitutes an order under the 1992 Act. An Enterprise, regardless of its capital classification, as well as its executive officers and directors may be subject to action by OFHEO under sections 1371, 1372, and 1376 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632, and 4636) and 12 CFR part 1780 for failure to comply with such order.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Second Japan-U.S. Clean Energy Partnership (JUCEP) Plenary Recognizes Achievements and Affirms Indo-Pacific Support Plans

# 									Second Japan-U.S. Clean Energy Partnership (JUCEP) Plenary Recognizes Achievements and Affirms Indo-Pacific Support Plans							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 23, 2021

At the second Japan-U.S. Clean Energy Partnership (JUCEP) plenary meeting on December 15, 2021, the United States and Japan, led by the U.S. Department of State and Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, reviewed achievements and set priorities to accelerate clean energy deployment in the Indo-Pacific region.

Established in April 2021 to implement the U.S.-Japan Climate Partnership and the U.S.-Japan Competitiveness and Resilience (CoRe) Partnership, JUCEP supports the vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) by advancing open, competitive, and transparent energy markets indispensable to a clean, secure, and sustainable energy supply.

In 2021, JUCEP outreach engaged hundreds of energy firms on renewable energy and grid modernization investment opportunities while highlighting U.S. and Japanese investment support tools. Capacity building activities advanced cooperation on Small Modular Reactor (SMR) nuclear energy, quality infrastructure, global procurement, power grid development, and critical mineral mining sector governance. In 2022, JUCEP will continue to advance progress in these areas as it supports joint pilot projects and cooperation on decarbonization technologies.

Plenary presentations underscored how combining U.S. and Japanese tools and capabilities under JUCEP offers stronger support by:
        - Expanding private sector project finance options and risk insurance;
        - Facilitating joint strategies to accelerate the deployment of zero-emission electricity sector renewable energy projects and grid modernization in the Indo-Pacific region; and
        - Holding a high-level public-private JUCEP Trilateral Commercial Forum in early 2022.

Plenary participants included Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance presenters, as well as Japan’s Bank for International Cooperation, External Trade Organization, International Cooperation Agency, Ministry of Finance, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, and Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation officials. U.S. participants included Department of State, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Treasury, Trade and Development Agency, and Agency for International Development presenters as well as Development Finance Corporation and Export Import Bank officials.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyJapanOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Amendment #2
                                ------------

	By this Amendment, Duke University ("DUKE") and CISTRON
Biotechnology, Inc. ("SPONSOR") agree to amend the terms of the Clinical
Study and Research Agreement entered into by the parties effective
September 1, 1998, ("Agreement") and first amended on December 18, 1998 as
follows:

        1. The parties agree that article 1, Statement of Work, shall be
expanded to include the research described in an additional
Statement of Work, a copy of which is attached to the Agreement as
Exhibit C.  The parties also agree that the SPONSOR shall provide
additional compensation to DUKE for the research set forth in
Exhibit C in accordance with the terms described in the supplemental
budget attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D.

        2. The parties agree that Article 1 will be further expanded to
include the research described in the Statement of Work attached to this
Agreement as Exhibit E.  Likewise, the parties agree that SPONSOR
shall provide additional compensation to DUKE for the research set
forth in Exhibit E in accordance with the terms described in the
supplemental budget attached to this Agreement as Exhibit F.

        3. The parties agree that the term of the Clinical Study and Research
Agreement shall be extended through December 31, 9999 and may be
extended beyond that date by mutual agreement of both parties.

        4. All other terms of the Agreement are unchanged and remain in full
force and effect.

AGREED:

DUKE UNIVERSITY                                 SPONSOR

By: /s/RALPH SNYDERMAN, M.D.                    By: /s/BRUCE C. GALTON
   ------------------------                        ------------------
       Ralph Snyderman, M.D.                        Bruce C. Galton
    Chancellor for Heath Affairs                    Chairman and CEO

Date executed: 3/17/99                          Date executed: 3-22-99

Acknowledged:

By: /s/Herman F. Staats       3/19/99
   --------------------
       Herman Staats, Ph.D.
       Principal Investigator
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.91 How may a foreign bank elect to be treated as a financial holding company? ( a ) *Filing requirement.* A foreign bank that operates a branch or agency or owns or controls a commercial lending company in the United States, or a company that owns or controls such a foreign bank, may elect to be treated as a financial holding company by filing a written declaration with the appropriate Reserve Bank.
( b ) *Contents of declaration.* The declaration must: ( 1 ) State that the foreign bank or the company elects to be treated as a financial holding company;
( 2 ) Provide the risk-based capital ratios and amount of Tier 1 capital and total assets of the foreign bank, and of each foreign bank that maintains a U.S. branch, agency, or commercial lending company and is controlled by the foreign bank or company, as of the close of the most recent quarter and as of the close of the most recent audited reporting period;
( 3 ) Certify that the foreign bank, and each foreign bank that maintains a U.S. branch, agency, or commercial lending company and is controlled by the foreign bank or company, meets the standards of well capitalized set out in § 225.90(b)(1)(i) and (ii) or § 225.90(b)(2) as of the date the foreign bank or company files its election;
( 4 ) Certify that the foreign bank, and each foreign bank that maintains a U.S. branch, agency, or commercial lending company and is controlled by the foreign bank or company, is well managed as defined in § 225.90(c)(1) as of the date the foreign bank or company files its election;
( 5 ) Certify that all U.S. depository institution subsidiaries of the foreign bank or company are well capitalized and well managed as of the date the foreign bank or company files its election; and
( 6 ) Provide the capital ratios for all relevant capital measures (as defined in section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831(o))) as of the close of the previous quarter for each U.S. depository institution subsidiary of the foreign bank or company.
( c ) *Pre-clearance process.* Before filing an election to be treated as a financial holding company, a foreign bank or company may file a request for review of its qualifications to be treated as a financial holding company. The Board will endeavor to make a determination on such requests within 30 days of receipt. A foreign bank that has not been found, or that is chartered in a country where no bank from that country has been found, by the Board under the Bank Holding Company Act or the International Banking Act to be subject to comprehensive supervision or regulation on a consolidated basis by its home country supervisor is required to use this process.
# C_2006297EN.01005101.xml

| 7.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/51

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 3 May 2006

in Case E-3/05

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway

(Failure of a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — free movement of workers — social security for migrant workers with family members residing in an EEA State other than the State of employment — regional residence requirement for family benefits — Article 73 of Regulation EEC 1408/71 — Article 7(2) of Regulation EEC 1612/68 — discrimination — justification on grounds of promoting sustainable settlement)

(Failure of a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — free movement of workers — social security for migrant workers with family members residing in an EEA State other than the State of employment — regional residence requirement for family benefits — Article 73 of Regulation EEC 1408/71 — Article 7(2) of Regulation EEC 1612/68 — discrimination — justification on grounds of promoting sustainable settlement)

(2006/C 297/18)

In Case E-3/05, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway –APPLICATION for a declaration that the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to Article 73 of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VI to the EEA Agreement (Council Regulation EEC No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto; alternatively by maintaining the same requirement, failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Act referred to at Point 2 of Annex V (Council Regulation EEC No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Henrik Bull and Thorgeir Örlygsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 3 May 2006, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the Defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the Defendant.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the Defendant.

---
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| */s/                Ben-Tsur Joseph*Ben-Tsur                JosephChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:                November 14, 2007   |   |   |   |

----
# C_2023316EN.01000201.xml

| 6.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 September 2023

(2023/C 316/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0731 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4533 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85535 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,9145 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9548 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5435 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,161 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 386,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4890 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9496 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,7481 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4652 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4134 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8297 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4614 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 431,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,6045 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 388,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,210 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,079 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3184 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5186 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,0965 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0731

JPY

Japanese yen

158,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4533

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85535

SEK

Swedish krona

11,9145

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9548

ISK

Iceland króna

143,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5435

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,161

HUF

Hungarian forint

386,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4890

RON

Romanian leu

4,9496

TRY

Turkish lira

28,7481

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4652

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4134

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8297

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4614

KRW

South Korean won

1 431,25

ZAR

South African rand

20,6045

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 388,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0060

PHP

Philippine peso

61,210

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,079

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3184

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5186

INR

Indian rupee

89,0965

---

(1)  
  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 4.88


 


Maximum Guaranty
Contract


 


Contract no. 2014JIYINZUIBAOZIDI14120745


Guarantor : LIYONGHUI


Guarantee :
CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : June27, 2014


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party B
(Guarantee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trading Group Co., Ltd., Party A (Guarantor) is willing to provide guaranty for Party
B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB90,000,000


 


Pledge Term : From August 29, 2013
to February 14,2014