alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.2

BERNARD CHAUS, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended December  31,  2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  |              |                                                                                                                     |
|--|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |              |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

February  2,2007

|  | /s/ BartonHeminover                                        BartonHeminoverChief FinancialOfficer |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00378-CV

Cedars Entertainment, L.P., Appellant

v.

Wynona J. Winters as Trustee of Barnett 2005 Family Trust, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY, 35TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 07-05-5961, HONORABLE STEPHEN ELLIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Cedars Entertainment, L.P. has filed its Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. We

grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 19, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Bradford R. Rich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/  Bradford R. Rich    |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |   |
| Bradford  R. Rich        |   |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |   |
| August 7,  2009     |   |   |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
ex4_11.htm






Exhibit 4.11










 


AMENDMENT TO THE


INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC. 401(K) PLAN


 







WHEREAS, International  Specialty Products Inc. (the "Corporation") maintains the International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of eligible employees; and


 







WHEREAS,  pursuant to Article X of the Plan, the Corporation, as sponsor of the Plan, has retained the authority to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and


 







WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act for federal tax law purposes; consequently, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19 detailing the rules for identifying same-sex spouses in a qualified retirement plan (collectively, the "Guidance"); and


 







WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to conform to the Guidance; and


 







NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the  Plan  is  amended  retroactively  to  be effective as of June 26, 2013 as follows:


 








	
  

	
I.

	
The following definition of Spouse shall be added to Article II of the Plan:







 







"Spouse" shall mean the spouse of a Participant determined by Federal law applicable to


 


Code §401(a) as announced in Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19; provided that to the extent required by a qualified domestic relations order pursuant to the terms of this Plan, a former Spouse of the Participant shall be treated as the Spouse of the Participant.


 








	
  

	
II.

	
The term "spouse" wherever found in the Plan shall be amended to be a capitalized word and carry with it the definition of Spouse as provided herein.







 








	
  

	
III.

	
In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.



























 







[signature page immediately follows]






  





  


  





  




























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed this 26 day of Sept., 2014




 


 












	 ATTEST:	 	
INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.


 


 

	 
	
/s/  Issa O. Yesufu

	 	
By:  /s/  Robin Swanson

	 
	
                         Secretary

	 	
Title:  Director, Global Opns. & Benefits
Docket Number FAA-2014-0455

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/9/13

Regional Airline Association 1/9/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/9/13

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/9/13
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8101

TIMOTHY ROYAL KING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT SMITH, Superintendent; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-440-5-BR)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Royal King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that King’s appeal is timely only as to the district

court’s order denying reconsideration, and not as to the underlying

order denying the petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); In re

Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir. 1992).

2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Royal King appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See King v. Smith, No. CA-01-440-

5-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2001).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 19.212 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant must include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 19.214.
# C_2022485EN.01009601.xml

| 21.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 485/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 485/96

---

Corrigendum to Call for proposals 2023 – EAC/A10/2022 – Erasmus+ Programme

(

  Official Journal of the European Union C 444 of 23 November 2022
  )

(2022/C 485/07)

On page 18, in point 5 – Deadline for the submission of applications:

The following deadline for submission of applications is added for Key Action 2:

| Large-scale European Sport Event | 21 February 2023 at 17:00 |
| --- | --- |

Large-scale European Sport Event

21 February 2023 at 17:00

---
#### §§ 1240.501-1240.502 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             FRONTIER ENERGY CORP.
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



      The undersigned, Robert Genesi, in his capacities as President and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of Frontier Energy  Corp.  does hereby certify that the
Form 10-Q of Frontier Energy Corp. for the quarter ended  June  30,  2008 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))  and  that  the  information
contained in such Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in  all  material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Frontier Energy Corp.

      This certification is given by the undersigned solely  for the purpose of
18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.


      Executed this 19th day of August, 2008.


                                  /s/ Robert Genesi
				  -----------------
                                  Robert Genesi
                                  President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                  Principal Financial Officer
§ 212.3 Prohibitions. ( a ) *Community.* A management official of a depository organization may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization if the depository organizations in question (or a depository institution affiliate thereof) have offices in the same community.
( b ) *RMSA.* A management official of a depository organization may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization if the depository organizations in question (or a depository institution affiliate thereof) have offices in the same RMSA and, in the case of depository institutions, each depository organization has total assets of $50 million or more.
( c ) *Major assets.* A management official of a depository organization with total assets exceeding $10 billion (or any affiliate of such an organization) may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization with total assets exceeding $10 billion (or any affiliate of such an organization), regardless of the location of the two depository organizations. The Board will adjust these thresholds, as necessary, based on the year-to-year change in the average of the Consumer Price Index for the Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, not seasonally adjusted, with rounding to the nearest $100 million. The Board will announce the revised thresholds by publishing a final rule without notice and comment in the Federal Register.
[61 FR 40302, Aug. 2, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 51679, Sept. 24, 1999; Reg. L, 72 FR 1276, Jan. 11, 2007; 84 FR 54471, Oct. 10, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000899778
<NAME>                        CASINO RESOURCE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,151,925
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    108,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       36,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,740,167
<PP&E>                                         3,406,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (743,102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,144,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,333,735
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          94,893
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,005,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,144,132
<SALES>                                        3,305,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,305,396
<CGS>                                          7,299,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,906,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,909,959
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               497,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (9,008,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7,008,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,996,462
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (5,011,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
Calypte Biomedical Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-16769) on Form S-8 of Calypte Biomedical Corporation of our report dated
February 19, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Calypte
Biomedical Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
1996 and for the period from February 18, 1988 (inception) through December 31,
1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of Calypte Biomedical Corporation.


                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


San Francisco, California
March 26, 1997
§ 1277.6 Operational risk capital requirement. ( a ) *General requirement.* Except as authorized under paragraph (b) of this section, each Bank's operational risk capital requirement shall at all times equal 30 percent of the sum of the Bank's credit risk capital requirement and market risk capital requirement.
( b ) *Alternative requirements.* With the approval of FHFA, each Bank may have an operational risk capital requirement equal to less than 30 percent but no less than 10 percent of the sum of the Bank's credit risk capital requirement and market risk capital requirement if: ( 1 ) The Bank provides an alternative methodology for assessing and quantifying an operational risk capital requirement; or
( 2 ) The Bank obtains insurance to cover operational risk from an insurer acceptable to FHFA and on terms acceptable to FHFA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              39
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,933
<INVENTORY>                                     19,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,970
<PP&E>                                          18,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           269
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,773)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,557
<SALES>                                         38,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,084
<CGS>                                           30,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (35)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,268)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,267)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        


</TABLE>
1

January 30, 2012

Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12

- 140 Washington, DE 20590

Subject: Petition for Exemption to Title 14 CFR Part 103, Subpart A, sec. 103.1(d) Unpowered, weighs les s than 155 lbs.

To Whom It May Concern:

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. seeks relief from this Federal Aviation Regulation to operate a replica of the Wright B rothers 1911 glider. The original glider weighed 158 lbs. and

was flown off the sand du n es at Kitty Hawk , North Carolina in 1911 for their investigations of the secrets of flight. The replica 1911 glider weighs 172 lbs. which is 17 lbs. over the maximum 155 lbs of the requirement of Title 14 CFR part 103, subpart A. Sec. 103.1(d). The Wright

brothers used a cotton muslin fabr ic on the original 1911 glider. Cotton muslin in this weight is no longer available. The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. has had to use modern cotton muslin that is stronger but heavier than the original fabric. The extra 17 pound weight of the 1911 replica gli der will not adversely affect the safety to the public.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. can and will operate this replica 1911 glider under all the rest of Title 14 CFR part 103, Ultralight vehicles, rules. All the personnel involved with the

WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. are experienced in the aviation operations and maintenance fields. They know and practice the safety rules required by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. plans to continue the Wright Brothers investigation i nto the mystery of flight. The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. is equipping the 1911 replica with an electronic recorder to record the flight parameters such as altitude ( which the glider would be in ground effect at all times ) , temperature, airspeed, control pressures, etc. The Wright brothers

could not record this da ta on their original 1911 glider. 

### The Wright Experience, Inc 

P.O. Box 3365 Warrenton, VA 20188

Phone: 540

- 347

- 1909

Fax : 540

- 349

- 1764 kenwhyde@aol.com www.wrightexperie nce.com

Rediscovering the Secrets of the Wright Brothers to Inspire a New Generation2

It is in the public interest to gather and record this information to show how far advanced the Wright brothers were in their knowledge of flight in their time. Flights will be conducted off the sand dunes of the Jockey’ s Ridge State Park, North Carolina in the area the Wright brothers conducted their flights in 1911.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. has flown over 200 flights off these sand dunes in a 1902 replica glider in 2002 and 2003 and these flights were conducted under Title 14, Pa rt 103. The 1902 glider weighed less than 155 lbs.

The WRIGHT EXPERIENCE, INC. believes it can operate this 1911 glider replica under Title 14, CFR part 103, EXCEPT sec. 103.1(d) without reducing the SAFETY to the PUBLIC, and

maintain a level of SAFETY r equired by Title 14 CFR, PART 103, and continue to add to the knowledge of the Wright B rothers experiments for future generations.

Sincerely,

Ken W. Hyde

President The Wright Experience, Inc.
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer