alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2663

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 

Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2663 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

2 CASTLE NUGENT FARMS. 

3 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

4 (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the south5 eastern shore of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is 

6 the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin 

7 Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 

8 50 years. 

9 (2) This land has the largest and healthiest 

10 fringing coral reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands. 

11 (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and 

12 pasturelands with considerable cultural resources in13 cluding both pre-Columbian and post-European set14 tlement. 

15 (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large his16 toric 17th century Danish estate house that sits on 

17 over 4 miles of pristine Caribbean oceanfront prop18 erty. 

19 (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nest20 ing and night heron nesting, it is the home for the 

21 Senepol cattle breed, a unique breed of cattle that 

22 was developed on St. Croix in the early 1900’s to 

23 adapt to the island’s climate. 

24 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

25 out a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of des-
3

HR 2663 RFS 

1 ignating Castle Nugent Farms as a unit of the National 

2 Park System. 

3 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

4 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 

5 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

6 by this section.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
From: John Miller [mailto:JMiller@wgpaver.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:23 AM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Subject: RE: Whitacre Greer green brick testing results

Gabrielle,

Sorry for the delay. I am attaching the spreadsheet. I have been trying to get info on the shale but they 

have not gotten back to me. When I get it I will forward to you.

Thanks,

John E Miller, PE

Engineering/EHS Manager

Whitacre Greer Co.

jmiller@wgpaver.com

330-823-1610 x230

Fax 330-823-6689

<<Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_WhitacreGreer.xlsx>>

From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 10:11 AM

To: 'jmiller@wgpaver.com' <jmiller@wgpaver.com>

Subject: RE: Whitacre Greer green brick testing results

Hi,

I just got your voicemail, sorry I was out of the office Friday.

For the name of the deposit, something like clay or shale or the name of the pit, or name of the formation. 

For the geologic age of the deposit something like Pennsylvanian, late Cretaceous, Mississippian, 

Paleocene, Eocene, Quaternary, Tertiary, Permian, etc. 

I hope this is helpful, I’ll be in the office Monday so you can call me if you want to talk about it more.

Thanks,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015
From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 12:42 PM

To: 'jmiller@wgpaver.com' <jmiller@wgpaver.com>

Subject: Whitacre Greer green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Miller,

As we discussed in our telephone conversation, I’m attaching a spreadsheet of the Whitacre Greer 

facilities that provided green brick testing results to EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end for 

you to fill out the Name of Clay Deposit, Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the 

Clay Deposit. Any information you are able to provide about the clay deposits will be much appreciated 

and helpful!

Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle 

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_WhitacreGreer.xlsx>>
Exhibit 32.2

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         |  |  |  |              
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------
|/s/ Michael Mazzoni                      |  |  |  | Date: 6/28/10
|Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Belgian Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Belgian Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Palace of Parliament

Bucharest, Romania

November 30, 2022

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Well, good morning, everyone.  It’s a pleasure to get a chance to meet with Foreign Minister Lahbib, really for the first time.  We’ve spoken, and of course we’ve been at the various NATO meetings, but this is our first opportunity to really get together in person, and for me to say again a belated congratulations on taking on the job.  Belgium of course is, to the United States, a close, trusted ally and partner.  It’s the center of activity for so much of our diplomacy between the European Union, NATO, and of course our own strong bilateral partnership, which is growing ever deeper and stronger, both on issues that join us together directly, issues in the Euro-Atlantic region, and indeed around the globe.

So as always, we have a lot to talk about, and I’m really pleased for the opportunity to do so on the margins (inaudible).

**FOREIGN MINISTER LAHBIB:**It’s a pleasure and an honor, as I said, and the occasion to speak a little French with Antony is always a pleasure.  We are a small country in the center of Europe, and it’s very important to have discussion and your support as an ally of the country, and we thank you for that.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRomaniaSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
41835.

#### WILLIAMS et al. v. KEEBLER.

Submitted February 7, 1966

Decided September 23, 1966.

*Albert E. Butler,*for appellants.

*Gibbs & Leaphart, T. Jim Leaphart,*for appellee.

Frankum, Judge.

The appeal in this case is not from a judgment, order or ruling of the trial court within the meaning of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965. Therefore, it follows that this court does not have jurisdiction of the purported appeal. See the answer of the Supreme Court to the certified question in this case. *Williams v. Keebler,*222 Ga. 437 (150 SE2d 674).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
# C_2022306EN.01002101.xml

| 11.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 August 2022

(2022/C 306/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0252 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4397 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84608 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3773 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9713 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9118 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,397 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 397,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7063 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9138 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,4099 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4682 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3207 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,0460 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6211 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4107 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8788 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9222 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5158 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 218,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5693 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,061 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,420 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2510 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7130 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,4680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0252

JPY

Japanese yen

138,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4397

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84608

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3773

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9713

ISK

Iceland króna

139,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9118

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,397

HUF

Hungarian forint

397,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7063

RON

Romanian leu

4,9138

TRY

Turkish lira

18,4099

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4682

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3207

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,0460

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6211

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4107

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,16

ZAR

South African rand

16,8788

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9222

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5158

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 218,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5693

PHP

Philippine peso

57,061

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,420

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2510

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7130

INR

Indian rupee

81,4680

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1310.3 Amendments.

The Council shall not amend or rescind appendix A to this part without providing the public with notice and an opportunity to comment in accordance with the procedures applicable to legislative rules under 5 U.S.C. 553.

[84 FR 8959, Mar. 13, 2019]
#### § 13.3 Business conduct.

A bank that is a government securities broker or dealer shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of its business as a government securities broker or dealer.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.32 Exchange rates for foreign currencies. When determining the rates of pension or parents' DIC or the amounts of burial, plot or headstone allowances or accrued benefits to which a claimant or beneficiary may be entitled, income received or expenses paid in a foreign currency shall be converted into U.S. dollar equivalents employing quarterly exchange rates established by the Department of the Treasury. ( a ) *Pension and parents' DIC.* ( 1 ) Because exchange rates for foreign currencies cannot be determined in advance, rates of pension and parents' DIC shall be projected using the most recent quarterly exchange rate and shall be adjusted retroactively based upon actual exchange rates when an annual eligibility verification report is filed.
( 2 ) Retroactive adjustments due to fluctuations in exchange rates shall be calculated using the average of the four most recent quarterly exchange rates. If the claimant reports income and expenses for a prior reporting period, the retroactive adjustment shall be calculated using the average of the four quarterly rates which were the most recent available on the closing date of the twelve-month period for which income and expenses are reported.
( b ) *Burial, plot or headstone allowances and accrued benefits.* Payment amounts for burial, plot or headstone allowances and claims for accrued benefits as reimbursement from the person who bore the expenses of a deceased beneficiary's last illness or burial shall be determined using the quarterly exchange rate for the quarter in which the expenses forming the basis of the claim were paid. If the claim is filed by an unpaid creditor, however, the quarterly rate for the quarter in which the veteran died shall apply. When entitlement originates during a quarter for which the Department of the Treasury has not yet published a quarterly rate, amounts due shall be calculated using the most recent quarterly exchange rate.

Cross References:
Accrued benefits. See § 3.1000. Accrued benefits payable to foreign beneficiaries. See § 3.1008. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[55 FR 8140, Mar. 7, 1990; 55 FR 10867, Mar. 23, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23848]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: NOAA Teacher-At-Sea Alumni Survey.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): NA.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Number of Respondents: 54.
    Average Hours per Response: 30 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 27.
    Needs and Uses: Consistent with the support for research and 
education under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C. 32 1440) 
and other coastal and marine protection legislation, National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provides educators an opportunity 
to gain first-hand experience with field research activities through 
the Teacher-at-Sea Program. Through this program, educators spend up to 
3 weeks at sea on a NOAA research vessel, participating in an on-going 
research project with NOAA scientists. The Teacher-at-Sea Program would 
like to survey the teacher participants on their experience before, 
during, and after they return from sea, in order to collect program 
evaluation data and improve program operations.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Semi-annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204468594e454b60444f430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83e7cbfaede6e8c3e7ece0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#377356415e5368655844435c524577585a551952584719505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a7e5b4c535e656855494e515f487a555758145f554a145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 29, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23848 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

146 

KA 11-01849 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMAL COOKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci,

Jr., J.), entered July 18, 2011. The order determined that defendant

is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he

is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act

([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant contends that County

Court erred in denying his request for a downward departure from his

presumptive risk level. Specifically, defendant contends that,

because his sentence for the underlying sex offense did not include a

period of postrelease supervision, it was determined that he is not a

risk to the community, and the lack of postrelease supervision

therefore constitutes a mitigating factor warranting a downward

departure. We reject that contention. A downward departure from the

presumptive risk level is warranted where “there exists a[] . . .

mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not

adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines”

(Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and

Commentary at 4 [2006]; see People v Coffey, 45 AD3d 658, 658). 

Inasmuch as defendant’s release from prison without “official”

supervision is a factor adequately taken into account by risk factor

14 (Release Environment: Supervision) of the Risk Assessment

Instrument (RAI), it is not a mitigating factor warranting a downward

departure (see generally People v Riverso, 96 AD3d 1533, 1534). 

Indeed, the RAI assesses more points to a defendant released without

official supervision because “[s]trict supervision is essential when a

sex offender is released into the community” (Sex Offender

Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 17). 

Additionally, we note that, although other law enforcement personnel
-2- 146 

KA 11-01849 

involved in defendant’s criminal action may have determined that

defendant could be released without supervision following his

incarceration, that determination is not controlling on the SORA

court’s risk level determination (see generally People v Jackson, 70

AD3d 1385, 1386, lv denied 14 NY3d 714). 

Entered: March 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. v. UNITED STATES

[60 C. Cls. 608; 270 U. S. 664]

On appeal. *Dismissed,*by the Supreme Court January 15, 1926, on motion of appellant, and mandate granted.
HomeDiplomatic Courier...Richard Dunning

# 									Richard Dunning							

DS Memorial

June 22, 1959

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Diplomatic Courier****Year of Death: 1951**Richard T. Dunning, Diplomatic Courier, died on June 22, 1951, in Sanoyie, Liberia, in the line of duty in an airplane crash.

**DS Public Affairs has been unable to locate the source of this image to seek permission for its use. Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have additional information**

 

Tags

DS Courier

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          336137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1949049
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                    4867690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9188241
<PP&E>                                         4272687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2489670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11434209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3733723
<BONDS>                                         203740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      10671802
<OTHER-SE>                                        3200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11434209
<SALES>                                        4804695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4804695
<CGS>                                          2761843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2761843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1468373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               25445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 557665
<INCOME-TAX>                                    202626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             355039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    355039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1067. THOMAS EDWARD STOKES, JR. v. THE STATE.

On November 27, 2013, Thomas Edward Stokes, Jr. was convicted of rape,

aggravated sexual battery and kidnapping with bodily injury. He filed a timely

motion for new trial. However, on January 21, 2016, Stokes filed a notice of appeal

from his convictions. In this notice of appeal he “waives his previously filed motion

for new trial and proceeds directly to appeal.” We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order sought

to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of the notice of

appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction upon this Court. 

Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Although the filing

of a motion for a new trial generally extends the deadline for filing an appeal, see

OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), Stokes waived his previously filed motion for new trial in this

case prior to entry of an order on that motion. Thus, Stokes’s notice of appeal, filed

more than two years after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, is untimely. 

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Because Stokes is represented by counsel, he is informed of the following in

accordance with Rowland v. State, supra at 875-876: This appeal has been dismissed

because you failed to file a timely notice of appeal from your judgment of conviction. 

If you still wish to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an

out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from

the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the

trial court denies your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to

file a notice of appeal referencing the denial of your requestfor an out-of-time appeal.

May 17, 2016
The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to Stokes and to his

attorney, and the latter also is directed to send a copy to Stokes.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/17/2016