alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021332EN.01000401.xml

| 18.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 August 2021

(2021/C 332/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1767 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85323 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1948 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0713 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3983 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,441 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 351,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5605 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9256 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,9113 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6138 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4838 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1704 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6983 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 381,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4416 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6244 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4910 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 932,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9869 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,346 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,3767 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,208 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2065 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4266 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,4390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1767

JPY

Japanese yen

128,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85323

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1948

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0713

ISK

Iceland króna

148,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3983

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,441

HUF

Hungarian forint

351,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5605

RON

Romanian leu

4,9256

TRY

Turkish lira

9,9113

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6138

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4838

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1704

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6983

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5993

KRW

South Korean won

1 381,91

ZAR

South African rand

17,4416

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6244

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4910

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 932,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9869

PHP

Philippine peso

59,346

RUB

Russian rouble

86,3767

THB

Thai baht

39,208

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2065

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4266

INR

Indian rupee

87,4390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection
with the REVLON WORLDWIDE CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
17th day of February, 1997.



                                                     /s/ Donald G. Drapkin
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     DONALD G. DRAPKIN
----

|                                     | Jurisdiction      of |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Name                                     | Incorporation        |
| Titan      Tire Corporation              | Illinois             |
|                                     |                 |
| Titan      Tire Corporation of Bryan     | Ohio                 |
|                                     |                 |
| Titan      Tire Corporation of Freeport  | Illinois             |
|                                     |                 |
| Titan      Tire Corporation of Texas     | Texas                |
|                                     |                 |
| Titan      Wheel Corporation of Illinois | Illinois             |
|                                     |                 |
| Titan      Wheel Corporation of Virginia | Virginia             |
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 28, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00336-CV

ALICE ADRIANNE JARMAN, Appellant

V.

BELINDA DIANNE JARMAN BROWN COSBY AND CHERYL LYNN 

JARMAN FOSTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 441992-401

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Alice Adrianne Jarman petitions this court to allow a permissive 

interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2021 amended order denying 

appellant’s motion for summary judgment. 

To be to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not 

otherwise entitled be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the 

order to be appealed involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is a 
2

substantial ground for difference of opinion” and (2) an immediate appeal from the 

order “may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Tex. Civ. 

Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (e)(4); Tex. 

R. Civ. P. 168. After reviewing the petition, the record, appellees’ response, and 

appellant’s reply, we conclude that the petition does not meet the requirements for a 

permissive interlocutory appeal. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for permissive interlocutory appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
# Official Journal L 255/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.255.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 255 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5329 September 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.255.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 255

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5329 September 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 107 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 107 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# EUR-Lex - E2003G0004 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# E2003G0004

**2003/4/: Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2003/SC of 4 December 2003 establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee **

*
Official Journal L 058 , 26/02/2004 P. 0025 - 0026 *

Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States

No 4/2003/SC

of 4 December 2003

establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Enlargement Agreement,

Having regard to Protocol 38a on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the EEA Enlargement Agreement,

Having regard to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Community on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2004 to 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. An EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee, hereinafter referred to as the Interim Committee, which should be operative as soon as possible, is hereby established.

2. The Interim Committee shall assist the EFTA States in preparing for the implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism for 2004 to 2009.

3. The Interim Committee shall report to the Standing Committee.

4. The Interim Committee may be assisted by the Missions of the EEA and EFTA States to the EU.

5. The Interim Committee shall, on the day of entering into force of the EEA Enlargement Agreement, be replaced by an EEA Financial Mechanism Committee.

6. The Interim Committee shall also discuss and assess coordination and integration between the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism.

7. The Interim Committee shall agree upon a President who shall be confirmed by the Standing Committee.

Article 2

This Decision shall take immediate effect.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2003.

For the Standing Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von Liechtenstein
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting part 224, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 224.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority and purpose.* Regulation X (this part) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*). This part implements section 7(f) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78g(f)), the purpose of which is to require that credit obtained within or outside the United States complies with the limitations of the Board's Margin Regulations T and U (12 CFR parts 220 and 221, respectively).
( b ) *Scope and exemptions.* The Act and this part apply the Board's margin regulations to United States persons and foreign persons controlled by or acting on behalf of or in conjunction with United States persons (hereinafter borrowers), who obtain credit outside the United States to purchase or carry United States securities, or within the United States to purchase or carry any securities (both types of credit are hereinafter referred to as purpose credit). The following borrowers are exempt from the Act and this part: ( 1 ) Any borrower who obtains purpose credit within the United States, unless the borrower willfully causes the credit to be extended in contravention of Regulations T or U.
( 2 ) Any borrower whose permanent residence is outside the United States and who does not obtain or have outstanding, during any calendar year, a total of more than $100,000 in purpose credit obtained outside the United States; and
( 3 ) Any borrower who is exempt by Order upon terms and conditions set by the Board.
[Reg. X, 48 FR 56572, Dec. 22, 1983, as amended by Reg. X, 63 FR 2839, Jan. 16, 1998]
Exhibit 24.3
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Michael B. Hoffman, in my
individual capacity and as Director of Unilab Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration statements for the filing of
securities of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") and any and all subsequent filings made by or on behalf of the
Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 11th day of October 1994.

                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael B. Hoffman
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Government Guest House

Ottawa, Canada

October 27, 2022

**FOREIGN MINISTER JOLY:**Well, welcome, Tony, to Ottawa.  It’s great to have you in town and actually also to show you my hometown tomorrow, Montreal.  We have a very strong relationship between Canada and the U.S., based on our shared history, common values, and a very strong friendship.  And also thank you for your friendship, because it’s been really terrific working with you over the last year.  And at the same time, we’re facing many global challenges, so let’s get to work.

(In French via interpreter) It’s a pleasure for me to host you here, of course, in Ottawa and tomorrow in Montreal, at my hometown.  We have a friendship between the two of us, but it’s also based on a friendship between our two countries, Canada and the U.S.   Now we’re dealing with huge international challenges, so let’s get to work.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**  Thank you so much, Mélanie.  It’s wonderful to be back in Canada.  I say technically back in Canada, because my very first visit technically as Secretary of State was a virtual visit to Canada, but there is nothing like actually being here and being here with my partner and friend, Mélanie Joly.

As the foreign minister said, we have been working incredibly closely together, quite literally around the world, including most recently in Washington just a few weeks ago.

**FOREIGN MINISTER JOLY:**  Yes, yeah.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**And the challenges that we face, as she said, are real and are significant.  But precisely because we’re facing them together as friends, as allies, as partners, that gives me tremendous optimism and confidence about the future.  The United States and Canada, working together as closely as we are, makes a big difference for our own people and around the world.

(In French via interpreter) I’m very happy to be back in Canada.  This is my second visit, because we had a virtual visit at the beginning of my term, but I’m here now.  It’s important because we have challenges, as my friend Mélanie said, but if we deal with these challenges together, as is the case between U.S. and Canada, we will succeed, succeed for our citizens but succeed also for countries around the world.  And I also applaud not only our partnership but our friendship facing these challenges.  As Mélanie said, let’s get to work.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCanadaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of IR BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/S/ JOHN N. FERMANIS
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      Exhibit 12
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(all amounts except ratios are shown in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        December 31,
                                       -----------------------------------------------
                                         2002      2001      2000      1999      1998
                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>

Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes,        $(204.8)    126.1   $  99.5   $  71.6   $  57.9
minority interests, equity income
and extraordinary item

Add (deduct) earnings of less than           0         0         0         0         0
50% owned affiliates (net of
distributed earnings) included in
pretax income

Add losses of less than 50% owned            0         0         0         0         0
affiliates included in pretax income

Add fixed charges net of capitalized      81.2      66.7      37.8      16.5      12.5
interest

Add previously capitalized interest        0.6       0.1       0.1       0.1       0.1
amortized during the period
                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Earnings                               $(123.0)  $ 192.9   $ 137.4   $  88.2   $  70.5

Gross interest expense including
capitalized interest (fixed charges)   $  86.4   $  77.0   $  48.8   $  23.6   $  14.1

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        (a)        2.5       2.8       3.7       5.0
</TABLE>

(a) - Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $209.4 million.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRY L. ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 21-6292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRY L. ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00064-LO-1)

Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021
2

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry L. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Terry L. Adams challenges the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 

115-291, §§ 401, 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5220-22. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Adams’ motion for appointment of counsel and 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Adams, No. 1:11-cr00064-LO-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

         STATEMENT RE:    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                            SEPTEMBER  30                     SEPTEMBER 30
                                      -------------------------       ---------------------------
                                           1996         1995               1996         1995 
                                      -------------  ----------       ------------   ------------
<S>                               <C>                <C>              <C>                <C>
Net income (loss) for computing
earnings per common share         $     (491,505)    $ (217,398)      $   (812,516)      (574,172)

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
during each period without
         dilution                     32,584,197     19,684,426         28,754,955     18,932,759

Addition from assumed exercise
of Common Stock warrants                 245,000      1,120,000            245,000      1,120,000

Addition from assumed
conversion of Preferred Stock            300,000        300,000            300,000        300,000 
                                  --------------     ----------       ------------    -----------  

                                      33,129,197     21,104,426         29,299,955     20,352,759
                                  ==============     ==========       ============    ===========
                
Net income per common share

  Without Dilution                $        (0.02)    $    (0.01)      $      (0.03)   $     (0.03)
                                     
  Fully diluted                   $        (0.02)    $    (0.01)      $      (0.03)   $     (0.03)
</TABLE>



                                     -12-