alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# IMMC.EESC-2018-04699-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2018-04699-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

European Economic and Social Committee

European Economic and Social Committee

ECO/480

ECO/480

Frontloading of resources for YEI (Youth Employment Initiative)

Frontloading of resources for YEI (Youth Employment Initiative)

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and correcting that Regulation as regards the resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and correcting that Regulation as regards the resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal

[COM(2018) 498 final - 2018/0265 (COD)]

[COM(2018) 498 final - 2018/0265 (COD)]

Consultation

| Consultation | European Parliament, 05/07/2018


  Council of the European Union, 19/07/2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 17/10/2018 |
| Plenary session No | 538 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 214/0/2 |

Consultation

European Parliament, 05/07/2018

European Parliament, 05/07/2018

Council of the European Union, 19/07/2018

Council of the European Union, 19/07/2018

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

17/10/2018

17/10/2018

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

538

538

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

214/0/2

214/0/2

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 538th plenary session of 17 and 18 October 2018 (meeting of 17 October 2018), by 214 votes with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 538th plenary session of 17 and 18 October 2018 (meeting of 17 October 2018), by 214 votes with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 17 October 2018

Brussels, 17 October 2018

Luca JAHIER

The president of European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
# C_2023080EN.01005201.xml

| 3.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/52

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 February 2023

(2023/C 80/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0988 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89289 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3587 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9992 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 153,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9535 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,809 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 387,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7015 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9025 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,6766 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5407 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4602 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6183 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6855 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4352 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 345,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,7046 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3878 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 360,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,170 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,030 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4859 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4050 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,3015 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0988

JPY

Japanese yen

141,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89289

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3587

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9992

ISK

Iceland króna

153,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9535

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,809

HUF

Hungarian forint

387,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7015

RON

Romanian leu

4,9025

TRY

Turkish lira

20,6766

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5407

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4602

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6183

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6855

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4352

KRW

South Korean won

1 345,90

ZAR

South African rand

18,7046

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3878

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 360,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6655

PHP

Philippine peso

59,170

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,030

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4859

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4050

INR

Indian rupee

90,3015

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
42158.

#### JACOBS v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In this action for declaratory judgment, plaintiff, the alleged insured, sought to have determined the question whether the defendant insurer was obligated, upon an automobile liability insurance policy, to defend plaintiff in a suit by a third party to recover damages resulting from *297an automobile collision. Plaintiff took this appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining all the grounds of defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.

Argued July 8, 1966

Decided September 16, 1966.

*Carroll Russell,*for appellant.

*Memory, Barnes & Memory, S. F. Memory, Jr.,*for appellee.

1. “The test of the sufficiency of a complaint in a declaratory judgment proceeding is not whether the complaint shows that the plaintiff is entitled to the declaration of rights in accordance with his theory, but whether he is entitled to a declaration of rights at all, so that even if the plaintiff is on the wrong side of the controversy, if he states the existence of a controversy which should be settled, he states a cause of suit for a declaratory judgment.” *Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Peek,*112 Ga. App. 260, 262 (145 SE2d 50) and citations. Thus, the plaintiff may be entitled to prevail on general demurrer even if as a matter of law he could not prevail upon a trial of the issues. The elaborated second, third, fourth and fifth grounds of general demurrer raised only the question whether the plaintiff was entitled to a declaration of rights in accordance with his theory and did not reach the question whether the petition stated a cause of action for declaratory relief. The trial court erred in sustaining these grounds of demurrer since the effect of the judgment would be to declare the rights of the parties, which the court was not authorized to do on demurrer.

2. The first ground of demurrer, objecting broadly that “The allegations of the petition as a whole . . . fail to allege facts which entitle petitioner to a declaratory judgment or any other relief,” aptly raised the question whether plaintiff alleged a justiciable controversy, and decision on this ground of demurrer is controlled, adversely to plaintiff, by *U. S. Cas. Co. v. Georgia Ac. R. Co.,*95 Ga. App. 100, 103 (97 SE2d 185).

The judgment of the trial court sustaining defendant’s general demurrer and dismissing plaintiff’s petition is affirmed on ground 1 with directions to the trial court to modify the judgment so as to exclude the sustaining of grounds 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the defendant’s general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed with direction.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
HomeDiplomatic Security Memorial...Richard T. Dunning

# 									Richard T. Dunning							

DSS Articles

By Vince Crawley, DSS Public Affairs

September 20, 2016

Richard True Dunning was among 31 passengers and nine crew members who were killed in the crash of Pan-Am Flight 151 in Liberia.

The Lockheed Constellation aircraft was en route from Johannesburg, South Africa, to New York, with planned stopovers in Kinshasa, Accra, Monrovia, Dakar, Lisbon and the Azores.

According to news reports, the aircraft departed Accra, in present-day Ghana, on the evening of June 21. The aircraft planned to stop at Roberts Field, Liberia, and radioed at 2:45 A.M. that it intended to land in 30 minutes. It was not heard from again. Following a massive multinational air search, the wreckage was found the next day on a 1,000-foot mountain near the village of Sanoyie.

Dunning had served in the U.S. Army in World War II. After his discharge, he joined the U.S. Department of State and was a diplomatic courier based at the U.S. Embassy in Paris.

Born in Dallas, Texas, he grew up in Glendale, California, where his mother lived. At the time of Dunning’s death, his father was working in Paris with the Economic Cooperation Administration, the agency that oversaw the postwar Marshall Plan and was the precursor to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

----

*The Diplomatic Security Memorial honors 137 employees, contractors, military personnel,**and host-nation security personnel who lost their lives in service to diplomatic security.*

*For more information, visit www.dsmemorial.state.gov*

Tags

Diplomatic SecurityDSS Articles

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 31.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Dawn M. Schlegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of DHB Industries, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the  registrant  and we have:  a)
designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that  material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period  in  which  this  annual  report  is being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and procedures as of a
date  within  90 days  prior  to the  filing  date of this  annual  report  (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about
the  effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls  which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
         record,   process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
         identified  for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
         internal  controls;  and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that involves  management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
_______________________
Dawn M. Schlegel
Chief Financial Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-12-00569-CV

____________________

IN THE ESTATE OF DONNA FELLS

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 86109 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

After submission of the appeal, it came to the attention of the Court that the 

judgment may not have finally adjudicated all claims between the parties. The 

parties agreed that the case should be returned to the trial court so that the trial 

court may clarify the judgment.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is 

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. All appellate timetables are 

suspended while the trial court retains jurisdiction over the case. A supplemental 

record shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by September 3, 2013. The appeal 
2

will be reinstated without further order of this Court when the supplemental clerk’s 

record is filed.

ORDER ENTERED August 1, 2013.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information taken from the
balance sheet as of September 30, 1999 (unaudited) and the statement of
operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 1999 (unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,311,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,264,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                   230,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,401,778
<PP&E>                                         732,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 708,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,411,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          986,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       296,839
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,849,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,411,775
<SALES>                                         51,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,266
<CGS>                                           41,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               383,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (186,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (186,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 17, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, November 17, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24101 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctioning Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security for Malign Cyber Activities

# 									Sanctioning Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security for Malign Cyber Activities							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 9, 2022

The United States is designating Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) and its Minister of Intelligence, Esmail Khatib, for engaging in cyber-enabled activities against the United States and its Allies.

In July 2022, cyber threat actors assessed to be sponsored by the Government of Iran and its MOIS disrupted Albanian government computer systems, forcing the government to suspend public services for its citizens.  Since at least 2007, the MOIS and its cyber actor proxies have conducted malicious cyber operations targeting a range of government and private-sector organizations across various critical infrastructure sectors.

Iran’s cyberattacks targeting civilian government services and critical infrastructure sectors can cause grave damage to these services and disregard norms of responsible peacetime state behavior in cyberspace.  The United States will continue to use all appropriate tools to counter cyberattacks against the United States and our Allies.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyCyber SecurityDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
# C_2021405EN.01000101.xml

| 7.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 October 2021

(2021/C 405/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1542 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4398 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1628 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0715 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9230 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,415 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9458 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,2802 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5913 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4575 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9876 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6728 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5712 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 379,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4561 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4407 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 487,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8297 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,804 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,6242 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,116 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3584 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,9641 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,4380 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1542

JPY

Japanese yen

128,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4398

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84970

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1628

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0715

ISK

Iceland króna

148,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9230

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,415

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5925

RON

Romanian leu

4,9458

TRY

Turkish lira

10,2802

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5913

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4575

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9876

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6728

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5712

KRW

South Korean won

1 379,91

ZAR

South African rand

17,4561

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4407

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 487,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8297

PHP

Philippine peso

58,804

RUB

Russian rouble

83,6242

THB

Thai baht

39,116

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3584

MXN

Mexican peso

23,9641

INR

Indian rupee

86,4380

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1807.801 Evaluation of Applications. ( a ) *Eligibility and completeness.* An Applicant will not be eligible to receive a CMF Award if it fails to meet the eligibility requirements described in § 1807.200 and in the applicable NOFA, or if the Applicant has not submitted complete Application materials. For the purposes of this paragraph (a), the CDFI Fund reserves the right to request additional information from the Applicant, if the CDFI Fund deems it appropriate.
( b ) *Substantive review.* In evaluating and selecting Applications to receive assistance, the CDFI Fund will evaluate the Applicant's likelihood of success in meeting the factors set forth in the applicable NOFA.
( c ) *Other factors.* The CDFI Fund may consider any other factors that it deems appropriate in reviewing an Application, as set forth in the applicable NOFA, the Application and related guidance materials.
( d ) *Consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies.* In the case of an Applicant that is a Federally regulated financial institution, the CDFI Fund may consult with the Appropriate Federal Banking Agency or Appropriate State Agency prior to making a final award decision and prior to entering into an Assistance Agreement.
( e ) *Recipient selection.* The CDFI Fund will select Recipients based on the criteria described in paragraph (b) of this section and any other criteria set forth in this part.