alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42215.

#### WILLIAMSON, Director v. MODERN HOMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in fi. fa. from the judgment of the trial court sustaining in part the affidavit of illegality filed by the defendant in fi. fa. to an unemployment contribution fi. fa., upon which levy was made, issued by the State Revenue Commissioner for the use of the Commissioner of Labor in the amount of $9,906.32 plus interest claimed to be due the State of Georgia as delinquent contributions on wages allegedly paid to employees of the defendant under the provisions of the Georgia Employment Security Law. *Held:*

1. “1. In determining whether an individual comes within the scope of the Employment Security Law *(Code Ann.*§ 54-601 et seq.), it is first necessary to establish that the individual in question performs services for wages, and this major premise must be established before the exceptions enumerated in *Code Ann.*§ 54-657 (h 6) of the law become material.

“2. One whose income is determined by the profit and loss which he derives from his individual business is not rendering services for wages within the purview of the Employment Security Law even though he is contributing his personal services to the enterprise.” *National &c. Convoy v. Undercofler,*109 Ga. App. 703 (137 SE2d 328).

2. The evidence adduced on the trial of this case authorized the finding of the trial court that certain of the individuals claimed by the Department of Labor to be employees for wages of the defendant in fi. fa. were independent contractors and not em-. ployees, and that such individuals did not perform services for wages so as to bring them within the scope of the Employ*341ment Security Law *(Code Ann.*§ 54-601 et seq.). The trial court did not err therefore in sustaining the affidavit of illegality filed by the defendant in fi. fa. with respect to these individuals and in allowing the fi. fa. to proceed for collection only as to that sum admitted by the defendant in fi. fa. to be due as accrued contributions under the Employment Security Law.

Argued September 6, 1966

Decided September 23, 1966.

*Otis L. Hath cock, Raymond R. Callaway,*for appellant.

*B. Lamar Tillman, Cam U. Young,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 163.201 Corporate opportunity. ( a ) If you are a director or officer of a Federal savings association, or have the power to direct its management or policies, or otherwise owe a fiduciary duty to a Federal savings association, you must not take advantage of corporate opportunities belonging to the savings association.
( b ) A corporate opportunity belongs to a Federal savings association if: ( 1 ) The opportunity is within the corporate powers of the savings association or a subsidiary of the savings association; and
( 2 ) The opportunity is of present or potential practical advantage to the savings association, either directly or through its subsidiary.
( c ) The OCC will not deem you to have taken advantage of a corporate opportunity belonging to the Federal savings association if a disinterested and independent majority of the savings association's board of directors, after receiving a full and fair presentation of the matter, rejected the opportunity as a matter of sound business judgment.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2022111EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 111/5 |

---

Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/382/20 – Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) in the field of external relations

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 300 A of 10 September 2020](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2020_300_A_TOC)
)

(2022/C 111 A/04)

On page 5, Section 5 ‘Assessment centre’ should read:

‘5)   
Assessment centre

A maximum of 3 times
 the number of successful candidates sought for each grade will be invited to this phase. If you meet the eligibility requirements according to the data in your online application and if you scored one of the
highest overall marks
 for the selection based on qualifications, you will be invited to the assessment centre.

Eight general competencies and the field-related competencies required for this competition will be tested at the assessment centre through
four tests
 held in your language 2, as described in the following matrices:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Competency | Tests |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | Analysis and problem-solving | | Case study |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Communication | | Case study |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 3. | Delivering quality and results | | Case study |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 4. | Learning and development | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 5. | Prioritising and organising | | Case study |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 6. | Resilience | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7. | Working with others | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 8. | Leadership | | General competency-based interview |

Each general competency will be marked out of 10. There is no pass mark per competency. However, you must reach a pass mark of at least 40/80 in total.

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Competency | Test | Pass mark |
| Field-related competencies | Field-related interview | 25/50 |
| Written test in the field | 25/50 |

Unless instructed otherwise, candidates will have to upload — to their EPSO account — scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. Further details and instructions will be provided by EPSO.’

---
Exhibit 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Haywood D. Cochrane,  Jr., in my
individual  capacity  and  as  Director  of  Unilab   Corporation,   a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban,  severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date  hereof  until such time as this Power of  Attorney  is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge,  record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration  statements for the filing of
securities  of the Company  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  as amended (the
"Securities  Act") and any and all  filings  made by or on behalf of the Company
with the United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  pursuant  to the
Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 17th day of June 1997.

                                              /s/ Haywood D. Cochrane
                                              Haywood D. Cochrane, Jr.
§ 222.26 Delivery of opt-out notices. ( a ) *In general.* The opt-out notice must be provided so that each consumer can reasonably be expected to receive actual notice. For opt-out notices provided electronically, the notice may be provided in compliance with either the electronic disclosure provisions in this subpart or the provisions in section 101 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 *et seq.*
( b ) *Examples of reasonable expectation of actual notice.* A consumer may reasonably be expected to receive actual notice if the affiliate providing the notice: ( 1 ) Hand-delivers a printed copy of the notice to the consumer;
( 2 ) Mails a printed copy of the notice to the last known mailing address of the consumer;
( 3 ) Provides a notice by e-mail to a consumer who has agreed to receive electronic disclosures by e-mail from the affiliate providing the notice; or
( 4 ) Posts the notice on the Internet Web site at which the consumer obtained a product or service electronically and requires the consumer to acknowledge receipt of the notice.
( c ) *Examples of no reasonable expectation of actual notice.* A consumer may *not* reasonably be expected to receive actual notice if the affiliate providing the notice: ( 1 ) Only posts the notice on a sign in a branch or office or generally publishes the notice in a newspaper;
( 2 ) Sends the notice via e-mail to a consumer who has not agreed to receive electronic disclosures by e-mail from the affiliate providing the notice; or
( 3 ) Posts the notice on an Internet Web site without requiring the consumer to acknowledge receipt of the notice.
## APPENDIX E

Rule Consistency Analysis For

Amendments to Rule 4601

December 17, 2009SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix E: Rule Consistency Analysis December 17 , 2009

E-2 Final Staff Report with Appendices For

Amendments to Rule 4601 This page intentionally blank.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix E: Rule Consistency Analysis December 17 , 2009

E-3 Final Staff Report with Appendices For

Amendments to Rule 4601 

### APPENDIX E Rule Consistency Analysis

I. REQUIREMENTS OF ANALYSIS

Pursuant to Section 40727.2 of the California Healt h and Safety Code, prior to adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or regulation, the Di strict is required to perform a written analysis that identifies and compares the air pollu tion control elements of the rule or regulation with corresponding elements of existing or proposed District and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules, regulations, and guidelines that apply to the same source category. The elements th at were analyzed are emission standards, monitoring and testing, and recordkeepin g and reporting requirements.

II. RULE CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

A. District Rules

Facilities could be subject to other District rules including:

 Rule 2010 Permits Required

 Rule 4102 Nuisance

 Rule 4652 Coatings and Ink Manufacturing

 Rule 4653 Adhesives

 Rule 4663 Organic Solvent Cleaning, Storage, and D isposal

The above-listed rules are not in conflict with, no r are they inconsistent with the requirements of Revised Proposed Rule 4601.

B. Federal EPA Rules and Regulations

1. Federal Control Techniques Guideline (CTG)

There is no EPA CTG for this source category.

2. Alternative Control Technology (ACT)

There is no EPA ACT for this source category.

3. Federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

There is no NSPS for this source category.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix E: Rule Consistency Analysis December 17 , 2009

E-4 Final Staff Report with Appendices For

Amendments to Rule 4601 4. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Po llutants (NESHAPs) and Maximum Achievable Performance Standards (MACTs)

There is no NESHAP or MACT for this source category

.

5. EPA Policy on Recordkeeping

The recordkeeping requirement in Rule 4601is consis tent with EPA’s policy to keep and maintain records for at least five years.

III. CONCLUSION

Based on the above analysis, District staff conclud es that Revised Proposed Rule 4601 satisfies RACT for architectural coatings in terms of emission limits and equipment

standards.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-955]


Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People's Republic of 
China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing 
Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski or Justin Neuman, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1395 and (202) 482-0486, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 18, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the countervailing duty investigation of certain magnesia 
carbon bricks from the People's Republic of China. See Certain Magnesia 
Carbon Bricks from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 FR 42858 (August 25, 2009). 
Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than October 
22, 2009.

Postponement of Due Date for the Preliminary Determination

    Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a 
countervailing duty investigation within 65 days after the date on 
which the Department initiated the investigation. However, the 
Department may postpone making the preliminary determination until no 
later than 130 days after the date on which the administering authority 
initiated the investigation if the petitioner makes a timely request 
for an extension pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act. In the 
instant investigation, the petitioner made a timely request on 
September 25, 2009, requesting a postponement until 120 days from the 
initiation date. See 19 CFR 351.205(e) and the petitioner's September 
25, 2009 letter requesting postponement of the preliminary 
determination. Therefore, pursuant to the discretion afforded the 
Department under 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and because the Department 
does not find any compelling reason to deny the request, we are 
extending the due date until 120 days after the Department's initiation 
for the preliminary determination. Therefore, the deadline for the 
completion of the preliminary determination is now December 16, 2009.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) 
of the Act.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24213 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 219.4 Exceptions. A financial institution is not entitled to reimbursement under this subpart for costs incurred in assembling or providing financial records or information related to: ( a ) *Security interests, bankruptcy claims, debt collection.* Any financial records provided as an incident to perfecting a security interest, proving a claim in bankruptcy, or otherwise collecting on a debt owing either to the financial institution itself or in its role as a fiduciary.
( b ) *Government loan programs.* Financial records that are necessary to permit the appropriate government authority to carry out its responsibilities under a government loan, loan guaranty or loan insurance program.
( c ) *Nonidentifiable information.* Financial records that are not identified with or identifiable as being derived from the financial records of a particular customer.
( d ) *Financial supervisory agencies.* Financial records disclosed to a financial supervisory agency in the exercise of its supervisory, regulatory, or monetary functions with respect to a financial institution.
( e ) *Internal Revenue summons.* Financial records disclosed in accordance with procedures authorized by the Internal Revenue Code.
( f ) *Federally required reports.* Financial records required to be reported in accordance with any federal statute or rule promulgated thereunder.
( g ) *Government civil or criminal litigation.* Financial records sought by a government authority under the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure or comparable rules of other courts in connection with litigation to which the government authority and the customer are parties.
( h ) *Administrative agency subpoenas.* Financial records sought by a government authority pursuant to an administrative subpoena issued by an administrative law judge in an adjudicatory proceeding subject to 5 U.S.C. 554, and to which the government authority and the customer are parties.
( i ) *Investigation of financial institution or its noncustomer.* Financial records sought by a government authority in connection with a lawful proceeding, investigation, examination, or inspection directed at the financial institution in possession of such records, or at an entity that is not a *customer* as defined in § 219.2 of this part.
( j ) *General Accounting Office requests.* Financial records sought by the General Accounting Office pursuant to an authorized proceeding, investigation, examination, or audit directed at a government authority.
( k ) *Federal Housing Finance Board requests.* Financial records or information sought by the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) or any of the Federal home loan banks in the exercise of the FHFB's authority to extend credit to financial institutions or others.
( l ) *Department of Veterans Affairs.* The disclosure of the name and address of any customer to the Department of Veterans Affairs where such disclosure is necessary to, and used solely for, the proper administration of benefits programs under laws administered by that Department.
[Reg. S, 61 FR 29640, June 12, 1996]
# C_2023222EN.01004301.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/43

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 June 2023

(2023/C 222/16)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0985 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,7224 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9825 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5990 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 369,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4253 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9631 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 26,6249 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6194 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4463 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5987 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7698 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4741 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,2575 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8866 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 425,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1091 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,133 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,535 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2331 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8431 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,0300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0985

JPY

Japanese yen

156,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86115

SEK

Swedish krona

11,7224

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9825

ISK

Iceland króna

148,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5990

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

369,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4253

RON

Romanian leu

4,9631

TRY

Turkish lira

26,6249

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6194

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4463

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5987

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7698

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4741

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,62

ZAR

South African rand

20,2575

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8866

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 425,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1091

PHP

Philippine peso

61,133

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,535

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2331

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8431

INR

Indian rupee

90,0300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calypte Biomedical Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




March 30,
2010




/s/ Adel
Karas


Adel
Karas


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and
FinancialOfficer)
#### § 4.59 Painful motion.

With any form of arthritis, painful motion is an important factor of disability, the facial expression, wincing, etc., on pressure or manipulation, should be carefully noted and definitely related to affected joints. Muscle spasm will greatly assist the identification. Sciatic neuritis is not uncommonly caused by arthritis of the spine. The intent of the schedule is to recognize painful motion with joint or periarticular pathology as productive of disability. It is the intention to recognize actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joints, due to healed injury, as entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint. Crepitation either in the soft tissues such as the tendons or ligaments, or crepitation within the joint structures should be noted carefully as points of contact which are diseased. Flexion elicits such manifestations. The joints involved should be tested for pain on both active and passive motion, in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing and, if possible, with the range of the opposite undamaged joint.
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09132013b [10/30/2013 1:27:10 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 9 / 13 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA

Nick Hutson EPA Joann Spalding Sierra Club John Coequyt Sierra Club

Bruce Buckheit Sierra Club

Jia Li CEQ Phillip Foy CEQ

Bruce Rodan OSTP 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries Video Performances Live Streams Podcasts Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural The Administration

President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards About the White House

Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps Our Government

The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09132013b [10/30/2013 1:27:10 PM] Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job