alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1266
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1266 appear at 75 FR 76622, Dec. 9, 2010.

§ 1266.9 Pledged collateral; verification. ( a ) *Collateral safekeeping.* ( 1 ) A Bank may permit a member that is a depository institution to retain documents evidencing collateral pledged to the Bank, provided that the Bank and such member have executed a written security agreement pursuant to § 1266.2(c) of this part whereby such collateral is retained solely for the Bank's benefit and subject to the Bank's control and direction.
( 2 ) A Bank shall take any steps necessary to ensure that its security interest in all collateral pledged by non-depository institutions for an advance is as secure as its security interest in collateral pledged by depository institutions.
( 3 ) A Bank may at any time perfect its security interest in collateral securing an advance to a member.
( b ) *Collateral verification.* Each Bank shall establish written procedures and standards for verifying the existence of collateral securing the Bank's advances, and shall regularly verify the existence of the collateral securing its advances in accordance with such procedures and standards.
[58 FR 29469, May 20, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 16621, Apr. 6, 1999; 65 FR 8263, Feb. 18, 2000. Redesignated at 65 FR 44430, July 18, 2000; 67 FR 12851, Mar. 20, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000899778
<NAME>                        CASINO RESOURCE CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,658,435
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    272,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       33,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,615,850
<PP&E>                                         1,085,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                   498,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,141,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,470,461
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         104,319
<OTHER-SE>                                      (857,648)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,141,510
<SALES>                                        8,228,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,228,220
<CGS>                                          6,266,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,038,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 532,785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               614,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,908,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (2,000,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,908,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (1,587,648)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,496,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.56)


</TABLE>
§ 223.51 What is the market terms requirement of section 23B? A member bank may not engage in a transaction described in § 223.52 unless the transaction is: ( a ) On terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the member bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving nonaffiliates; or
( b ) In the absence of comparable transactions, on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that in good faith would be offered to, or would apply to, nonaffiliates.
§ 19.18 Commencement of proceeding and contents of notice. ( a ) *Commencement of proceeding.* — ( 1 ) ( i ) Except for change-in-control proceedings under section 7(j)(4) of the FDIA, 12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(4), a proceeding governed by this subpart is commenced by issuance of a notice by the Comptroller.
( ii ) The notice must be served by Enforcement Counsel upon the respondent and given to any other appropriate financial institution supervisory authority where required by law. Enforcement Counsel may serve the notice upon counsel for the respondent, provided that Enforcement Counsel has confirmed that counsel represents the respondent in the matter and will accept service of the notice on behalf of the respondent.
( iii ) Enforcement Counsel must file the notice with OFIA.
( 2 ) Change-in control proceedings under section 7(j)(4) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(4)) commence with the issuance of an order by the Comptroller.
( b ) *Contents of notice.* Notice pleading applies. The notice must provide: ( 1 ) The legal authority for the proceeding and for the OCC's jurisdiction over the proceeding;
( 2 ) Matters of fact or law showing that the OCC is entitled to relief;
( 3 ) A proposed order or prayer for an order granting the requested relief;
( 4 ) The time, place, and nature of the hearing as required by law or regulation;
( 5 ) The time within which to file an answer as required by law or regulation;
( 6 ) The time within which to request a hearing as required by law or regulation; and
( 7 ) That the answer and/or request for a hearing must be filed with OFIA.
§ 1010.118 Receipt, agent certification, and cancellation page. ( a ) *Format.* The receipt, agent certification and cancellation page shall be prepared in accordance with the sample found in section XXVII of the appendix to this part: Sample Receipt, Agent Certification and Cancellation Page.
( b ) The original and one copy of this executed page shall be attached to the Property Report delivered to prospective purchasers. After the purchaser has signed the receipt and the salesman has signed the certification, the copies can be retained by the developer for a period of three years from the date of execution or the term of the contract, whichever is the longer. Upon demand by the Director, the developer shall, without delay, make the copies of these receipts and certifications available for inspection by the Director or the developer shall forward to the Director any of the receipts and certifications, or copies thereof, as the Director may specify.
( c ) If the transaction takes place through the mails, the cost figures shall be entered and the person most active in dealing with the prospective purchaser shall sign the certification prior to mailing the Property Report to the purchaser. Otherwise, the certification shall be executed in the presence of the purchaser.
( d ) The date of Report appearing on the receipt shall be the same as that appearing on the cover sheet of the Property Report.
( e ) Notification of cancellation by mail shall be considered given at the time post-marked.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 33-71788 and No. 33-80306) of Titan International, Inc. of our report
dated February 25, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial
statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Form
10-K.
  /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 St.
Louis, MO
 February
25, 2010
§ 238.140 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 1467; 1467a, 1818, 5361, 5365.
( b ) *Purpose.* This subpart establishes the requirement for a covered company to conduct stress tests. This subpart also establishes definitions of stress test and related terms, methodologies for conducting stress tests, and reporting and disclosure requirements.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3




Report of Independent Accountants



Card Acquisition Funding LLC, Transferor,
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Servicer,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card
Receivables, that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2002, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
servicing of the securitized credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
maintained effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables as of December 31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects,
based upon the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.







March 25, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24024]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Science


Notice of Renewal of the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory 
Committee

    Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) and in accordance with 41of the Code of Federal Regulations, 
Section 102-3.65, and following consultation with the Committee 
Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is 
hereby given that the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee has 
been renewed for a two-year period.
    The Committee will provide advice to the Associate Director of the 
Office of Science for Nuclear Physics (DOE), and the Assistant 
Director, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (NSF), on 
scientific priorities within the field of basic nuclear science 
research. The Under Secretary for Science has determined that renewal 
of the Committee is essential to conduct business of the Department of 
Energy and the National Science Foundation and is in the public 
interest in connection with the performance duties imposed by law upon 
the Department of Energy. The Committee will continue to operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95-91), and 
implementing regulations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rachel Samuel at (202) 586-3279.

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 1, 2009.
Eric Nicoll,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24024 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.403 Collection and transmission of annual AMC registry fees. ( a ) *Collection of annual AMC registry fees.* States that elect to register and supervise AMCs pursuant to the AMC Rule shall collect an annual registry fee as established in § 1102.402 from AMCs eligible to be on the AMC Registry.
( b ) *Transmission of annual AMC registry fee.* States that elect to register and supervise AMCs pursuant to the AMC Rule shall transmit AMC registry fees as established in § 1102.402 to the ASC on an annual basis. States may align a one-year period with any 12-month period, which may, or may not, be based on the calendar year. Only those AMCs whose registry fees have been transmitted to the ASC will be eligible to be on the AMC Registry.
#### § 1808.600 Full faith and credit and incontestability of Guarantee.

The full faith and credit of the Federal Government is pledged to the payment of all Bonds issued as part of a Bond Issue with respect to Verifiable Losses of Principal, Interest, and Call Premium. An executed Guarantee shall be conclusive evidence that: the Guarantee has been properly authorized; the underlying Bond qualified for such Guarantee; and, but for fraud or material misrepresentation, such Guarantee will be presumed to be legally valid, binding, and enforceable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793631
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XV LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         134,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,328
<PP&E>                                       6,480,450
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,281,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,344,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,049,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,344,004
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,519
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.75
        

</TABLE>
**BB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 05 13 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TERRANCE ANTHONY ROBERTS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 17 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 10 2023

08/10/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0513
Exhibit 4.1


NUMBER                                                                    SHARES

                               INTER-CON/PC, INC.
               ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA


                                      ****

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

                                    **NAME**

IS THE OWNER AND REGISTERED HOLDER OF

                              **NUMBER OF SHARES**

SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF INTER-CON/PC, NO PAR VALUE

TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR
BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY
ENDORSED.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS CERTIFICATE TO
BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND TO BE SEALED WITH THE SEAL OF THE
CORPORATION THIS         DAY OF                     ,                        .
                 -------        --------------------  -----------------------


    ----------------------------------      ----------------------------------
                  SECRETARY                               PRESIDENT
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 11a0777n.06

No. 10-2059

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

CORRINE MELTON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CLARICE STOVALL,

Respondent-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FORTHE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

M E M O R A N D U M

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: SILER, McKEAGUE and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Petitioner Corrine Melton was tried in 2004 and found guilty by a jury of 

several offenses under Michigan law: first degree home invasion, six counts of larceny of a firearm,

larceny in a building, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The Tuscola

County Circuit Court imposed several ten to twenty-five year prison sentences, to run concurrently,

and a two-year prison term on the possession of a firearm offense, to run consecutively. The

convictions and sentences were upheld by the Michigan Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. 

Petitioner’s subsequent petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied by the district court in a tenpage opinion issued on July 20, 2010. One issue has been certified for appeal. Petitioner contends

the prosecution’s circumstantial case was comprised of constitutionally insufficient evidence to

sustain her convictions. 
No. 10-2059

Melton v. Stovall

On appeal, petitioner reiterates her arguments that the prosecution’s case against her was

devoid of physical evidence tying her to the alleged home invasion and theft of firearms. She

maintains that the state’s circumstantial evidence was sufficient only to create suspicion that she was

the perpetrator and could not support the jury’s finding that she was guilty beyond a reasonable

doubt. 

Petitioner has not raised any argument that is not completely and properly addressed in the

district court’s opinion. The district court correctly recognized that federal court review of the state

courts’ rulings is limited by the constraints imposed by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The district court also recognized that assessment of the

sufficiency of the evidence must be undertaken in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and

that the jury’s verdict must be upheld unless no reasonable juror could have found the essential

elements of the charged offenses established beyond a reasonable doubt. Having duly considered

the district court’s opinion in light of petitioner’s appellate arguments, we find no error. 

Accordingly, finding that a separate opinion would be duplicative and unnecessary, we hereby

AFFIRM the district court’s order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus on the reasoning

of its opinion. 

- 2 -
<PAGE>

11)  Statement re:    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      For the Nine Months Ended
                                                            September 30
                                                             (Unaudited)
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      1997                 1996
                                                   ----------           ---------
<S>                                              <C>                  <C>
Net Loss for Computing Earnings
   per Common Share                              $   (236,733)        $   (812,516)
                                                 ------------         ------------
                                                 ------------         ------------

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding during each period without
   dilution                                        45,842,479           28,754,955

Addition from assumed exercise of Common
   Stock Warrants                                   3,570,000              245,000

Addition from assumed conversion of
   Preferred Stock                                    300,000              300,000
                                                 ------------         ------------

                                                   49,712,479           29,299,955
                                                 ------------         ------------
                                                 ------------         ------------

Net Income Per Common Stock

   Without Dilution                              $      (0.00)        $      (0.03)

   Fully Diluted                                 $      (0.00)        $      (0.03)
</TABLE>