alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 223.23 What valuation and timing principles apply to purchases of and investments in securities issued by an affiliate? ( a ) *Valuation* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of § 223.32 with respect to financial subsidiaries, a member bank's purchase of or investment in a security issued by an affiliate must be valued at the greater of: ( i ) The total amount of consideration given (including liabilities assumed) by the member bank in exchange for the security, reduced to reflect amortization of the security to the extent consistent with GAAP; or
( ii ) The carrying value of the security.
( 2 ) *Examples.* The following are examples of how to value a member bank's purchase of or investment in securities issued by an affiliate (other than a financial subsidiary of the member bank). ( i ) *Purchase of the debt securities of an affiliate.* The parent holding company of a member bank owns 100 percent of the shares of a mortgage company. The member bank purchases debt securities issued by the mortgage company for $600. The initial carrying value of the securities is $600. The member bank initially must value the investment at $600.
( ii ) *Purchase of the shares of an affiliate.* The parent holding company of a member bank owns 51 percent of the shares of a mortgage company. The member bank purchases an additional 30 percent of the shares of the mortgage company from a third party for $100. The initial carrying value of the shares is $100. The member bank initially must value the investment at $100. Going forward, if the member bank's carrying value of the shares declines to $40, the member bank must continue to value the investment at $100.
( iii ) *Contribution of the shares of an affiliate.* The parent holding company of a member bank owns 100 percent of the shares of a mortgage company and contributes 30 percent of the shares to the member bank. The member bank gives no consideration in exchange for the shares. If the initial carrying value of the shares is $300, then the member bank initially must value the investment at $300. Going forward, if the member bank's carrying value of the shares increases to $500, the member bank must value the investment at $500.
( b ) *Timing* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A purchase of or investment in a security issued by an affiliate remains a covered transaction for a member bank for as long as the member bank holds the security.
( 2 ) *A member bank's purchase of or investment in a security issued by a nonaffiliate that becomes an affiliate of the member bank.* A member bank's purchase of or investment in a security issued by a nonaffiliate that becomes an affiliate of the member bank must be treated according to the same transition rules that apply to credit transactions described in paragraph (b)(2) of § 223.21.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly consolidated financial statements of UNUM Corporation and Subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such contained in UNUM 
Corporation's SEC Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         8,993,500
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      27,200
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,140,300
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  227,800
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              11,385,000
<CASH>                                          45,400
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             520,100
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,191,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,869,500
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,700,700
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,650,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                558,500
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,282,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,869,500
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,530,400
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            421,900
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 400
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  39,200
<BENEFITS>                                   1,146,400
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (48,900)<F1>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                208,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            146,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   146,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>This item contains the amounts of deferred and amortized policy acquisition
costs for the period presented.
<F2>Restated to reflect two-for-one common stock split completed June 2, 1997.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,007,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,314,111
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,321,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,720,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,601,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,321,518
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (301,253)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               592,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (893,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (893,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1403.8 Agency review of request for amendment of record. Upon receipt of a request for amendment of a record, the Privacy Act Officer shall: ( a ) Correct any portion of a record which the individual making the request believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete and thereafter inform the individual in writing of such correction, or
( b ) Inform the individual in writing of the refusal to amend the record and of the reasons therefor, and advise that the individual may appeal such determination as provided in § 1403.9.
§ 1291.28 Approval of AHP applications under the General Fund and Targeted Funds. ( a ) *Approval of AHP applications.* Subject to the requirements in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, a Bank shall approve applications for AHP subsidy under its General Fund and any Targeted Funds that meet all of the applicable AHP eligibility requirements in this part in descending order, starting with the highest scoring application until the total funding amount for the particular AHP funding round, except for any amount insufficient to fund the next highest scoring application, has been approved.
( b ) *AHP application alternates.* For the General Fund and any Targeted Funds, the Bank also may, in its discretion, approve a specified number, as determined by the Bank, of the next highest scoring applications as alternates eligible for funding, and may approve any tied applications as alternates eligible for funding pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, if any previously committed AHP subsidies become available, pursuant to a written policy on approving alternates for funding established by the Bank and included in the Bank's AHP Implementation Plan. If a Bank has established such a policy for approving alternates for funding and sufficient previously committed AHP subsidies become available within one year of application approval, the Bank shall approve the designated alternates for funding within that one-year period.
( c ) *Tied applications.* ( 1 ) Where two or more applications to a General Fund or Targeted Fund have identical scores in the same AHP funding round and there is insufficient AHP subsidy to approve all of the tied applications but sufficient subsidy to approve one of them, a Bank shall approve the tied application that prevails under the Bank's scoring tie-breaker methodology in its policy adopted pursuant to § 1291.25(c).
( 2 ) A tied application that does not prevail under the Bank's scoring tie-breaker methodology, or is tied with another application but requested more subsidy than the amount of AHP funds that remain to be awarded under the Fund, shall be approved as an alternate for funding if the Bank has a written policy to approve alternates for funding under the Fund.
( d ) *Applications to multiple Funds—approval under one Fund.* If an application for the same project is submitted to more than one Fund at a Bank in a calendar year and the application scores high enough to be approved under each Fund, the Bank shall approve the application under only one of the Funds pursuant to the Bank's policy established in its AHP Implementation Plan.
( e ) *No delegation.* A Bank's board of directors may not delegate to Bank officers or other Bank employees the responsibility to approve or disapprove the AHP subsidy applications, as well as any alternates under the Bank's General Fund and any Targeted Fund if the Bank has a written policy to approve alternates for funding under such Fund.
§ 19.7 Good faith certification. ( a ) *General requirement.* Every filing or submission of record following the issuance of a notice must be signed by at least one counsel of record in the counsel's individual name and must state that counsel's mailing address, electronic mail address, and telephone number. A party who acts as the party's own counsel must sign that person's individual name and state that person's mailing address, electronic mail address, and telephone number on every filing or submission of record. Electronic signatures may be used to satisfy the signature requirements of this section.
( b ) *Effect of signature.* — ( 1 ) The signature of counsel or a party will constitute a certification that: the counsel or party has read the filing or submission of record; to the best of the counsel's or party's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the filing or submission of record is well-grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and the filing or submission of record is not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
( 2 ) If a filing or submission of record is not signed, the ALJ will strike the filing or submission of record, unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movant.
( c ) *Effect of making oral motion or argument.* The act of making any oral motion or oral argument by any counsel or party constitutes a certification that to the best of the counsel's or party's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the counsel's or party's statements are well-grounded in fact and are warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and are not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as DHB
Industries, Inc.) (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 18, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    LARRY
ELLIS
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Larry Ellis President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
.· Disposition Comments 

Docket No: 2014-0627 

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-217-AD 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2013-008 

Next Step: [8J FRAN 0 SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

~ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received - If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required 

Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal pointfor guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040. IC Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one ofthefollowing: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

lfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter( s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

Page 1 of3 
.- If NO, we don 't agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date 

Branch Manager Date 

Page 3 of3
§ 1815.105 Major decision points. ( a ) The possible environmental effects of an Application, including any Comprehensive Business Plan, must be considered along with technical, economic, and other factors throughout the decisionmaking process. For most Fund actions there are two distinct stages in the decisionmaking process: ( 1 ) Preliminary approval stage, at which point applications are selected for funding; and
( 2 ) Final approval and funding stage.
( b ) Environmental review shall be integrated into the decisionmaking process of the Fund as follows: ( 1 ) During the preliminary approval stage, the designated Fund official shall determine whether the Application proposes actions which are categorically excluded, or normally require an environmental assessment or an EIS;
( 2 ) If the designated Fund official determines that the Application proposes actions which normally require an environmental assessment or an EIS, the applicant shall be informed that the final approval and funding, in addition to any other conditions, is contingent upon: ( i ) The applicant supplying to the Fund all information necessary for the Fund to perform or have performed any environmental review required by this part;
( ii ) The applicant not using any Fund financial assistance to perform any of such proposed actions in the Application that affect the physical environment until Fund approval is received; and
( iii ) The outcome of the environmental review required by this part;
( 3 ) The Fund will perform or have performed the environmental reviews required by this part;
( 4 ) A preliminary approval of an Application may be withdrawn or further conditions may be imposed based upon the outcome of an environmental review required by this part; and
( 5 ) If the designated Fund official determines that the Application proposes actions that require an environmental assessment or an EIS, the environmental assessment and/or EIS must be completed and circulated prior to the use of Federal funds for any activity that triggers the need for an environmental assessment and/or EIS.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XV Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
86-A, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
86-A,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                            /s/ Robert P Johnson
                                Robert P. Johnson, President
                                AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                                Managing General Partner
                                November 10, 2004



                            /s/ Patrick W Keene
                                Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                                AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                                Managing General Partner
                                November 10, 2004
#### ADAMS V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 14, 1913.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Armstead Brown.

No- counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and William L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

No error in the record. Affirmed.
# C_2022199EN.01000801.xml

| 17.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 May 2022

(2022/C 199/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0422 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85045 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4978 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0479 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2188 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,710 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 385,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6675 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9469 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,3121 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5057 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3473 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1812 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6601 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4531 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9195 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0786 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 294,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5836 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,705 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,274 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2819 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9324 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0810 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0422

JPY

Japanese yen

135,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85045

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4978

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0479

ISK

Iceland króna

138,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2188

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,710

HUF

Hungarian forint

385,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6675

RON

Romanian leu

4,9469

TRY

Turkish lira

16,3121

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5057

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3473

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1812

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6601

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4531

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,90

ZAR

South African rand

16,9195

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0786

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 294,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5836

PHP

Philippine peso

54,705

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,274

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2819

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9324

INR

Indian rupee

81,0810

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---