alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David B. Dunham, Respondent, *v.*David Silberstein and Edward M. Harlam, Appellants.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

October, 1900.)

Chattel mortgage — When void as to judgment creditor.

A chattel mortgage, not filed until after issue of execution against the mortgagor, is void as to the judgment creditor even though he had actual notice of its existence before entry of his judgment.

*643Appeal from judgment on verdict and order denying new trial. The action was brought to recover possession of seven carriages, or their value. The defendants are the substituted indemnitors of the sheriff, the original defendant. The answer denied every thing except the taking, and justified that under an execution in favor of the defendant, Edward M. Harlam, and against John E. Cammann, the plaintiff’s mortgagor.

Joseph Rosenzweig, for appellants.

David M. Neuberger, for respondent.

Hascall, J.

This appeal involves the main question as to whether a chattel mortgage, not filed until after issue of execution against the mortgagor, is still valid against the creditor, he having had actual notice of its existence prior to the time of entry of his judgment. We think the law upon this point is established that, as to a purchaser having knowledge of the mortgage lien, even though the instrument be not filed, he is bound; but, as to the judgment creditor, such mortgage is actually void, notwithstanding he may have had notice of its existence brought home to him. Stephens v. Perrine, 143 N. Y. 476. We write upon this same subject in another ease at this present term, presenting the like proposition. McDonald v. City Trust, etc., Co. And see also Hale v. Sweet, 40 N. Y. 99. The facts before us, shown by the record, would call for reversal on other grounds, discussed by counsel, concerning testimony admitted over objection and exception; but since the main question is resolved in favor of the appellants, such grounds need not be further considered.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Conlan, J., concurs.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
# C_2023082EN.01000301.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 March 2023

(2023/C 82/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0615 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88530 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1430 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9958 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0610 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,508 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 378,71 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7080 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9235 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,0628 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5728 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4437 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3325 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7069 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4296 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,2837 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3326 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 256,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7513 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,128 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,781 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5248 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1997 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,9185 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0615

JPY

Japanese yen

144,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88530

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1430

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9958

ISK

Iceland króna

150,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0610

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,508

HUF

Hungarian forint

378,71

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7080

RON

Romanian leu

4,9235

TRY

Turkish lira

20,0628

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5728

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4437

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3325

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7069

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4296

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,24

ZAR

South African rand

19,2837

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3326

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 256,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7513

PHP

Philippine peso

58,128

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,781

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5248

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1997

INR

Indian rupee

86,9185

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
51062 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

Amended Restoration Plan 

Tuesday, September 29, 2009. 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC). 

ACTION: Amendment of Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation Restoration Plan. 

On October 7, 2008, the FDIC 

established a Restoration Plan for the 

Deposit Insurance Fund (the DIF or the 

Fund), which was implemented 

immediately. The Restoration Plan 

called for the FDIC to set assessment 

rates such that the reserve ratio would 

return to 1.15 percent within five years. 

On February 27, 2009, the FDIC 

concluded that the problems facing the 

financial services sector and the 

economy at large constituted 

extraordinary circumstances and 

amended the Restoration Plan and 

extended the time within which the 

reserve ratio would return to 1.15 

percent from five to seven years 

(Amended Restoration Plan). 

In May 2009, Congress amended the 

statutory provision governing 

establishment and implementation of a 

Restoration Plan to allow the FDIC eight 

years to bring the reserve ratio back to 

1.15 percent, absent extraordinary 

circumstances. The FDIC has concluded 

that the Amended Restoration Plan 

should be extended from seven to eight 

years as is allowed under current law. 

Therefore, the FDIC amends the 

Amended Restoration Plan adopted on 

February 27, 2009, as follows: 

1. The period of the Amended 

Restoration Plan is extended to eight 

years. 

2. The FDIC will not impose any 

further special assessments under the 

final rule adopted in May 2009. 

3. The FDIC plans to maintain 

assessment rates at their current levels 

through the end of 2010. The FDIC is 

immediately adopting a uniform 3 basis 

point increase in assessment rates 

effective January 1, 2011, to ensure that 

the fund returns to 1.15 percent within 

the Amended Restoration Plan period of 

eight years. 

4. At least semi-annually hereafter, 

the FDIC will update its loss and 

income projections for the Fund. If 

necessary to return the reserve ratio to 

1.15 percent, the Board will increase 

assessment rates prior to the end of the 

eight-year period, following notice-andcomment rulemaking. 

5. This Amended Restoration Plan 

shall be implemented immediately. 

By order of the Board of Directors. 

Dated at Washington, DC, this 29th of 

September, 2009. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–23802 Filed 9–30–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714–01–P 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         229,583                 216,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  258,152                 389,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,833                  40,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,804                 587,172
<PP&E>                                         243,859                 270,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,050                 207,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 571,381                 670,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          922,586                 942,430
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                       108,441                 108,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (459,646)               (380,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   571,381                 670,636
<SALES>                                        390,624               1,113,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,369               1,133,244
<CGS>                                          279,979                 669,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,284               1,318,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,529                 121,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                (30,970)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,206                 129,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,410)               (326,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,410)               (326,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0               2,854,831
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,410)               2,528,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                     .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                     .23
        

</TABLE>
§ 192.575 Other requirements for charitable organizations. ( a ) *Charter and gift instrument requirements.* The charitable organization's charter (or trust agreement) and the gift instrument for the contribution must provide that: ( 1 ) The appropriate Federal banking agency may examine the charitable organization at the charitable organization's expense;
( 2 ) The charitable organization must comply with all supervisory directives that the appropriate Federal banking agency imposes;
( 3 ) The charitable organization must operate according to written policies adopted by its board of directors (or board of trustees), including a conflict of interest policy;
( 4 ) The charitable organization must not engage in self-dealing; and
( 5 ) The charitable organization must comply with all laws necessary to maintain its tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code.
( b ) *Stock certificate requirement.* The savings association must include the following legend in the stock certificates of shares that the savings association contributes to the charitable organization or that the charitable organization otherwise acquires: “The board of directors must consider the shares that this stock certificate represents as voted in the same ratio as all other shares voted on each proposal considered by the shareholders, as long as the shares are controlled by the charitable organization.”
( c ) *Voting ratio.* As long as the charitable organization controls shares, the savings association must consider those shares as voted in the same ratio as all of the shares voted on each proposal considered by the savings association's shareholders.
( d ) *Filing requirement.* After the savings association completes its stock offering, it must submit copies of the following documents to the appropriate OCC licensing office if it is a Federal savings association or with the appropriate FDIC region if it is a State savings association: ( 1 ) The charitable organization's charter and bylaws (or trust agreement);
( 2 ) The charitable organization's operating plan (within six months after the savings association's stock offering);
( 3 ) The charitable organization's conflict of interest policy; and
( 4 ) The gift instrument for the contributions of either stock or cash to the charitable organization.
|   | 1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | IR      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC. |
|                    |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| Date:      May 15, 2009 | By:                      | /s/ Michael K.      Wilhelm                              |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                    |                               |
Exhibit 32.1

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Bernard T. Marren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  |  |  |              
|----------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------
|/s/ Bernard T. Marren                     |  |  |  | Date: 6/28/10
|Bernard T Marren, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |
<PAGE> 1

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                              DATED March 7, 2000



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-3 (No.  333-60025)  and  Form S-8 (No.  333-43925)  of CDW
Computer  Centers,  Inc. of our reports  dated  January 20, 2000 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form
10-K.

                                            PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 7, 2000
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 271 

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to extend the applicability 

of such Act to individuals determined to have a mental capacity of 

less than 18 years of age. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to extend 

the applicability of such Act to individuals determined 

to have a mental capacity of less than 18 years of 

age. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the United States Code 

5 ‘‘Audrey Nerenberg Act’’ . 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 403(1) of the Missing Children’s Assistance 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 5772(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 271 IH

1 whose mental capacity is less than 18 years of age as de2 termined by an appropriate medical authority)’’ after 

3 ‘‘age’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall 

6 take effect on the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year beginning 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# C_2023321EN.01000101.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 321/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 314, 4.9.2023

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 304, 28.8.2023

OJ C 296, 21.8.2023

OJ C 286, 14.8.2023

OJ C 278, 7.8.2023

OJ C 271, 31.7.2023

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Russian Federation (21-203) – Extension of the Treaty of April 8, 2010

# 									Russian Federation (21-203) – Extension of the Treaty of April 8, 2010							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

February 3, 2021

Arms Control

Exchange of notes at Moscow January 26, 2021; entered into force February 3, 2021.

Extension of agreement signed April 8, 2010: TIAS 11-205
Download Agreement						 [864 KB]

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationRussiaTreaties

Back to Top
427 A.2d 241

#### Augustine et ux. v. Augustine et ux. Appeal of Stephanie D. Augustine.

Submitted November 16, 1979.

John M. Leonard, for appellants;

Richmond H. Ferguson, for appellees.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Order affirmed.
§ 150.490 When must I deposit securities with state authorities? You must deposit securities with a state's authorities or, if applicable, a Federal Home Loan Bank under § 150.510, if you meet all of the following: ( a ) You are located in the state.
( b ) You act as a private or court-appointed trustee.
( c ) The law of the state requires corporations acting in a fiduciary capacity to deposit securities with state authorities for the protection of private or court trusts.
# C_2023223EN.01000101.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 223/01)

Last publication

OJ C 216, 19.6.2023

Past publications

OJ C 205, 12.6.2023

OJ C 189, 30.5.2023

OJ C 173, 15.5.2023

OJ C 164, 8.5.2023

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023

OJ C 134, 17.4.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### § 1411.1 Inflation adjustment of civil money penalties for failure to file a certified statement, pay any premium required or obtain approval before employment of persons convicted of criminal offenses.

In accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended, a civil money penalty imposed pursuant to section 5.65(c) or (d) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, shall not exceed $257 per day for each day the violation continues.

[89 FR 1445, Jan. 10, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                            5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                               1,490,219
<SECURITIES>                         000
<RECEIVABLES>                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                         000
<INVENTORY>                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,490,219
<PP&E>                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,490,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                1,635,804
<BONDS>                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                000
<PREFERRED>                          000
<COMMON>                             000
<OTHER-SE>                           (145,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,490,219
<SALES>                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     36,779
<CGS>                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     201,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (164,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (164,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      000
<CHANGES>                            000
<NET-INCOME>                         (164,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.56)


</TABLE>
#### GIRARD TRUST CO., GEORGE STEVENSON, WILLIAM R. VERNER, ET AL., v. UNITED STATES

[59 C. Cls. 727; 270 U. S. 163]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was reversed, the Supreme Court deciding:

1. Where interest on tax refunds is allowed by statute, a suit for the interest after refund of a tax is maintainable in the Court of Claims. *Stewart*v. *Barnes,*153 U. S. 456, distinguished.

2. Under section 1324 (a) of the revenue act of November 23, 1921, which provides that, upon the allowance of a claim for the refund of internal-revenue taxes paid, interest shall be allowed and paid upon the total amount of such refund “ to the date of such allowance,” the date to which the interest runs is neither the date of actual repayment nor the date on which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue first decides that there has been an overassessment and refers the matter to the collector for examination and report of the amounts to be refunded, but the date on which the commissioner approves the amount thus ascertained for payment.

3. The above section dates the interest (a) from the time when the tax was paid, if it was paid *“*under a specific protest setting *755forth in detail the basis of and reasons for such protest,” but (b) from six months after the date of filing claim for refund, if there was no protest or payment pursuant to additional assessment. *Helé,*that in order to date the interest from time of payment of tax the protest under which it was paid must set forth a specific and valid reason for a refund.

4. Where a tax payment was less than the amount illegally assessed, due to deduction of the discount allowed on anticipatory payments by section 1009 of the revenue act of October 3, 1917, the amount refundable, with interest, was the amount actually paid, not including the discount.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 1, 1926.