alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

FILED

July 14, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

WINDON H. TAYLOR and ) C/A NO. 01A01-9810-CV-00563

SARAH A. TAYLOR, )

 )

Plaintiffs-Appellees, )

 )

 )

v. ) APPEAL AS OF RIGHT FROM THE

 ) SUMNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

 )

 )

 )

T&N OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC., )

JERALD W. NICHOLS and GAYLE J. )

NICHOLS, )

 ) HONORABLE THOMAS GOODALL,

Defendants-Appellants. ) JUDGE

For Appellant For Appellee

LARRY L. CRAIN LOUIS W. OLIVER, III

Brentwood, Tennessee Hendersonville, Tennessee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED Susano, J.
1

See Taylor, et ux. v. T&N Office Equipment, Inc., et al., C/A No.01A01-

9609-CV-00411, 1997 WL 272444 (Tenn.App. at Nashville, May 23, 1997).

2

The note provides for “reasonable attorneys’ fees and court and other

costs” if it is “placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or for

protection of...interest...in collateral.”

3

Rule 10(b), Rules of the Court of Appeals, provides as follows:

The Court, with the concurrence of all judges

participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or

modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum

opinion when a formal opinion would have no

precedential value. When a case is decided by

memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM

OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be

cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent

unrelated case.

2

When this case was first before us,1 we concluded that

the trial court had failed to conduct a proper hearing on the

subject of the attorney’s fees to which the appellees were

entitled under the terms of the promissory note at issue in this

case.2 We remanded this case to the trial court to hold such a

hearing. The only issue now before us on this second appeal is

whether the trial court’s subsequent award of attorney’s fees of

$11,960.13 is reasonable, considering the criteria set forth in

Disciplinary Rule 2-106(B) of the Code of Professional

Responsibility (Rule 8, Rules of the Supreme Court). Our de novo

review of the record of the proceedings below convinces us that

the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s

determination of a reasonable fee in this case. See Rule 13(d),

T.R.A.P.

The judgment below is affirmed, pursuant to the

provisions of Rule 10(b), Rules of the Court of Appeals.3 The

appellees’ request for fees and expenses in connection with this

appeal is denied. Costs on appeal are taxed against the

appellants. This case is remanded to the trial court for such

further proceedings, if any, as may be required, consistent with
3

this opinion, and for the collection of costs assessed below, all

pursuant to applicable law.

__________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.

CONCUR:

________________________

Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

________________________

Herschel P. Franks, J.
# C_2023217EN.01001101.xml

| 20.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 June 2023

(2023/C 217/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0922 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85268 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6943 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9772 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,6335 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,778 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 374,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4570 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9588 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 25,8250 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5964 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4411 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5379 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7625 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4646 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,8497 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8182 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 381,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0542 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,883 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,987 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2588 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6768 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,5125 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0922

JPY

Japanese yen

154,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85268

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6943

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9772

ISK

Iceland króna

149,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,6335

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,778

HUF

Hungarian forint

374,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4570

RON

Romanian leu

4,9588

TRY

Turkish lira

25,8250

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5964

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4411

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5379

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7625

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4646

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,93

ZAR

South African rand

19,8497

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8182

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 381,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0542

PHP

Philippine peso

60,883

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,987

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2588

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6768

INR

Indian rupee

89,5125

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32(a)
 LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
LAMAR MEDIA CORP.
 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Dated: February 25, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Advertising Company

Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Media Corp.Dated: February 25, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Keith A. IstreKeith A. IstreChief Financial Officer, Lamar Advertising Company

Chief Financial Officer, Lamar Media Corp.
§ 19.196 Disreputable conduct. Disreputable conduct for which an individual may be censured, debarred, or suspended from practice before the OCC includes: ( a ) Willfully or recklessly violating or willfully or recklessly aiding and abetting the violation of any provision of the Federal banking or applicable securities laws or the rules and regulations thereunder or conviction of any offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust;
( b ) Knowingly or recklessly giving false or misleading information, or participating in any way in the giving of false information to the OCC or any officer or employee thereof, or to any tribunal authorized to pass upon matters administered by the OCC in connection with any matter pending or likely to be pending before it. The term “information” includes facts or other statements contained in testimony, financial statements, applications for enrollment, affidavits, declarations, or any other document or written or oral statement;
( c ) Directly or indirectly attempting to influence, or offering or agreeing to attempt to influence, the official action of any officer or employee of the OCC by the use of threats, false accusations, duress, or coercion; by the offer of any special inducement or promise of advantage; or by the bestowing of any gift, favor, or thing of value;
( d ) Disbarment or suspension from practice as an attorney, or debarment or suspension from practice as a certified public accountant or public accountant, by any duly constituted authority of any state, possession, or commonwealth of the United States or the District of Columbia for the conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, where the conviction has not been reversed on appeal;
( e ) Knowingly aiding or abetting another individual to practice before the OCC during that individual's period of suspension, debarment, or ineligibility;
( f ) Contemptuous conduct in connection with practice before the OCC, and knowingly making false accusations and statements, or circulating or publishing malicious or libelous matter;
( g ) Suspension, debarment, or removal from practice before the Board of Governors, the FDIC, the former OTS, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or any other Federal or state agency; and
( h ) Willfully violating any of the regulations contained in this part.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  Exhibit 11.1

                              DIALOGIC CORPORATION
                       CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                                                          Twelve months ended
                                                                                             December 31,
                                                                                      1998              1997             1996
Basic Earnings
<S>                                                                                 <C>              <C>             <C>    
Income applicable to shares used in
     Calculation of net income per share                                          $ 36,608          $ 21,752         $ 25,548
Shares used in calculation of net income per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding                                                 16,010            15,931           15,654
Net income per share                                                              $   2.29          $   1.37         $   1.63


Diluted Earnings
Income applicable to shares used in
     Calculation or net income per share                                          $ 36,608          $ 21,752         $ 25,548
Shares used in calculation of net income per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding                                                 16,010            15,931           15,654
Dilutive  effect of stock options after  application  of treasury  stock
method                                                                                 548               667              763
Number of shares in calculation of net income
     per share                                                                      16,558            16,598           16,417
Net income per share                                                               $  2.21           $  1.31          $  1.56

</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1251/2006

of 18 August 2006         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 of 30 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards trade with third countries in the sugar sector (2), and in particular of the Article 36,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 55, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

(3)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 36.

(4)OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 24.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 19 August 2006

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.III to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
POWER OF ATTORNEY


          WHEREAS,   the   undersigned   officers  and   directors  of  Dialogic
Corporation  desire to authorize Howard G. Bubb, Thomas G. Amato and Theodore M.
Weitz to act as their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of executing
and filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K, including all amendments thereto,

          NOW, THEREFORE,

          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that  each  person  whose  signature
appears  below  constitutes  and  appoints  Howard G. Bubb,  Thomas G. Amato and
Theodore M. Weitz,  and each of them, his true and lawful  attorney-in-fact  and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,  to sign the Dialogic
Corporation  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 1997,
including any and all amendments and supplements  thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents,  and each of them,  full power and  authority to do and perform each and
every  act and  thing  requisite  and  necessary  to be done  in and  about  the
premises,  as fully and to all intents  and  purposes as he might or could do in
person,  hereby  ratifying and  confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes,  may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

          IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  have  executed  this power of
attorney in the following capacities on this __ day of February, 1999.

SIGNATURE                             TITLE



//s Howard G. Bubb
___________________                   President, Chief Executive Officer 
Howard G. Bubb                        and Director


                                      
/s/Kenneth J. Burkhardt, Jr.
_________________________             Director
Kenneth J. Burkhardt, Jr.


/s/Masao Konomi
______________________                Director
Masao Konomi

                                      Director
/s/John N. Lemasters
_____________________
John N. Lemasters

                                      Director
/s/Francis G. Rodgers
_____________________
Francis G. Rodgers

                                      Director
/s/James J. Shinn
_____________________
James J. Shinn


/s/Nicholas Zwick
_____________________                 Director
Nicholas Zwick


/s/Thomas G. Amato
______________________________        Treasurer,  Vice President and Chief 
Thomas G. Amato                       Financial  Officer (Chief Financial and 
                                      Accounting Officer)
#### George N. Adams, Appellant, v. The Old Dominion Steamship Company, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant. Hyland & Zabriskie (Nelson Zabriskie, of counsel), for appellant; Owen & Sturges (Frank D Sturges, of counsel), for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

No opinion.
Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-03240 and Form S-8 No. 33-29491 both amended on March 11, 1998)
pertaining to the Konover Property Trust, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993
Employee Stock Incentive Plan, the Konover Property Trust, Inc. 1995 Outside
Directors' Stock Award Plan, the Konover Property Trust, Inc. 1996 Restricted
Stock Plan and the Konover Property Trust, Inc. 1997 Qualified Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of our report dated January 31, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders'
equity of Konover Property Trust, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 25, 1999
Order filed, March 6, 2013

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 01106

- CR

____________

DOUGLAS WAYNE RING , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Tria l Court Cause No. 64814



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 20, 2013. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because th e reporter’s record

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sarah Caldwell , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 18

Sithe/Independence Power Partners, L.P.
335 Madison Avenue, 28th Floor
New York, New York 10017



Dear Sirs:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Sithe/Independence
Power Partners, L.P. and its subsidiary (collectively, the "Partnership") as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1999, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1999 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
have issued our report thereon dated March 3, 2000. Note 2 to such financial
statements contains a description of your adoption during the year ended
December 31, 1999 of the expense as incurred method of accounting for major
overhaul costs. In our judgement, such change is to an alternative accounting
principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,


Deloitte and Touche LLP


New York, New York
March 3, 2000
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Kenneth Haber, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of OM Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 28, 2008       /s/ Kenneth Haber Kenneth Haber    Chief Financial Officer
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATIONCompugraphics International Limited
    
    United KingdomCompugraphics USA Inc.
    
    DelawareCyantek Corporation
    
    DelawareGroupement Pour Le Traitement Du terril De Lubumbashi (55%)
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsHarko CV
    
    NetherlandsKey Professional Services Ltd.
    
    GibraltarO.M.G. Chemicals (S) Pte. Ltd
    
    SingaporeOM Group (Suzhou) Electronic Chemicals Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaOM Group Ultra Pure Chemicals Limited
    
    United KingdomOM Group Ultra Pure Chemicals Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeOM Group Ultra Pure Chemicals SAS
    
    FranceOM Group Ultra Pure Chemicals Sdn Bhd
    
    MalaysiaOM Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareOMG (Asia) Electronic Chemicals Co., Ltd.
    
    TaiwanOMG (Suzhou) Electronic Chemicals Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaOMG Americas, Inc.
    
    OhioOMG Asia-Pacific Co., Ltd.
    
    TaiwanOMG Belleville Limited
    
    CanadaOMG Borchers GmbH
    
    GermanyOMG Borchers SAS
    
    FranceOMG Electronic Chemicals (M) Sdn Bhd
    
    MalaysiaOMG Electronic Chemicals Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeOMG Electronic Chemicals, Inc.
    
    DelawareOMG Europe GmbH
    
    GermanyOMG Finland Oy
    
    FinlandOMG Harjavalta Chemicals Holding BV
    
    NetherlandsOMG Japan, Inc.
    
    JapanOMG Kokkola Chemicals Holding (Two) BV
    
    NetherlandsOMG Kokkola Chemicals Oy
    
    FinlandOMG UK Limited
    
    United KingdomSociete Congolaise Pour le Traitement du Terril de Lubumbashi (49%)
    
    Democratic Republic of CongoOMG (Shanhai) Trading Company, Ltd.
    
    China
Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the “Servicer”), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021- N1 Servicing Agreement dated as of March 25, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust  2021-N1, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2023.  By: ______________________________  Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1