alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY

LAMAR MEDIA CORP.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Lamar Advertising Company (Lamar)
and Lamar Media Corp. (Media) certifies, to his knowledge and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the combined Annual Report on
Form 10-K of
Lamar and Media for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in that combined Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Lamar and Media.

|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.                          
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|                         |  |     |  | Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.                              
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Advertising Company
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Media Corp.        
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|Dated: November 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Keith A. Istre                                
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|                         |  |     |  | Keith A. Istre                                    
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Lamar Advertising Company
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Lamar Media Corp.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for year ended December 31, 2013(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  April 1, 2014

   

   

   /s/ Steven RothName:

   Steven RothTitle:

   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-05-00744- CV

K e nne th Le e M c Al lis te r , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY , 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 05-4 57- C26, H ONO RAB LE BI LLY RAY STUB B LEF IELD, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant filed his notice of appea l wit h t h i s Court on November 1, 2005. On Dec ember

13, the Will iamson County District Clerk informed t h i s Court that she had notified appellant on November 8 of hi s responsibility to pay the fe e for

the pre paration of the cler k’s re cord, but appellant had f

ailed to timely pay or m ake a rra ng ements for

the pay ment of this fee . On J anuar y 18, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the cler k’s rec ord wa s overdue and that appe llant’s appea l would be di smissed for want of prosecution if he did not respond to this Court by J anuar y 30. Spe c if ic a lly , a pp e lla nt w a s r e qu e ste d to “ make arr a ng e me nts fo r t

he c le rk’s reco rd and

su bmi t a status report r eg ardingthis appeal.”2 To date, a

ppellant has not re plied to this C ourt nor made arr ang ements for the prepa ration and filing of the cler k’s rec ord. We there foredismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 37.3(b).

W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice B e fo re Chi e f Jus tic e L aw, Justi c e s B . A . Sm ith and Pember ton Dismissed for Want of Prosec ution Filed: Mar ch 2, 2006
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Linda Pace, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Carlyle Secured Lending III (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





• the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


• the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 3, 2022/s/    Linda PaceLinda PaceChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





*The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 211.31 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) under the authority of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (BHC Act) (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*), the Bank Export Services Act (title II, Pub. L. 97-290, 96 Stat. 1235 (1982)) (BESA), and the Export Trading Company Act Amendments of 1988 (title III, Pub. L. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1384 (1988)) (ETC Act Amendments).
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart is in furtherance of the purposes of the BHC Act, the BESA, and the ETC Act Amendments, the latter two statutes being designed to increase U.S. exports by encouraging investments and participation in export trading companies by bank holding companies and the specified investors. The provisions of this subpart apply to eligible investors as defined in this subpart.
§ 16.30 Request for interpretive advice or no-objection letter. Any person requesting interpretive advice or a no-objection letter from the OCC with respect to any provision of this part shall: ( a ) File a copy of the request, including any supporting attachments, with the OCC's Law Department at the address provided at *www.occ.gov*;
( b ) Identify or describe the provisions of this part to which the request relates, the participants in the proposed transaction, and the reasons for the request; and
( c ) Include with the request a legal opinion as to each legal issue raised and an accounting opinion as to each accounting issue raised.
[59 FR 54798, Nov. 2, 1994, as amended at 82 FR 8109, Jan. 23, 2017; 85 FR 42641, July 14, 2020]
# C_2006272EN.01003701.xml

| 9.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/37

---

Authorisation of State measure pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 (3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2006/C 272/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections to the notified measure

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 58699

Title: EFTA Surveillance Authority decision of 8 March 2006 on the notification of an amendment of the nationwide seed capital scheme

Objective: To increase the supply of seed capital

Legal basis: St.prp. nr.1 (2004-2005), Budsjett-innst. S.nr. 6 (2004-2005) and Budsjett-innst. S. nr. 8 (2004-2005)

Duration: Up to 15 years

Budget: Subordinated loans of NOK 667 million (approximately EUR 81 million) and a loss-fund of NOK 167 million (approximately EUR 20 million)

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 16, 2009, 8 a.m. to October 16, 2009, 5 p.m., Grand Hyatt Seattle, 721 Pine Street, Seattle, WA 98101 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 22, 2009, 74 FR 48269-48273.                

The time of the meeting on October 16, 2009 has been changed to 7:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 29, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24032 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
--Et? E&zFfij*.., . T. r. -, - ,**m*.*m Par q . M- v.

JR. Pm 1- u 2. w . WSAVY -..-D W. & m I -- T O MLr o w m* 

### OFFICE OF THE All-ORNEY GENERAL c- mnT* *vIo) Y. - JOCSIMIU **AUSTIN DIQ**  **smlm SAIL-**  **mumvm** **-*Twu** **-C. “**  **-*** **s?msIIuoH-w- -**  **WAISQ -..w**  **w. L**  **wtu.lmumm** 

### January 6, 1999
Hon. Harry w. 

## nmge DistrlotAttorney Cataatille,Texas Dear Sir:

on as to whether Court hfia

authority advised that it iu t the Ceunty Wmbui1.d vised Civil Statutiia O? .k~ttar,

and Article totes 

### whfak artiolse 

### refer 4hxui8llo~*r‘~



### Oourt to use the 

### plural wo deem it aet forth these artiolea at lengtk,

## 4.3

Hon. &rry W. Flentge, January 6, 1959, Pa&a 2

. and a oopg of same Is enolosad herewith. Yours rei3peotfully. -ATTORNEY CENERAL OF TEXAS

Assistant

WJF:AW ENCLOBURE

A'I!TORWEYGEWERAL **OFTEXAS**
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA2_o l<-/-N.M- :< 2 7- 4.]) 

Directorate Identifier: -AD 

{/you make changes to zhe values in rile toh!t: hdow. you must t:n.wre the lotal' update accordingly If 

they do not, click (or Tub) i11to a11d then out ofrhe cha~·l-'-g'-e_d_c_· 'l_l. ________________ ___. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

{e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) _ our) Products 

Midspar Life Limit I (tQw Program & ' 

Oven.ving Support 

500.0 

' _ 

$1p,loo _, ~tt .. ~ 

Fitting Inspection ·ejta. b.f_-{_;1 ~'L-1 ' f} ~ it l /'Y.i'Jc:, 1-lf Ia flb ., ' ; t/ : 

'• < i 

" ,.·,1 l 

•• 1f \ 

., ,, .. ., <i ~ ~ 

:) ' .fH.: . '.' '~ ' c r ~·~~, : l. 

' \. i'' ' . ( ' 

' I; ,, C{i ____ ., ; • 1: . ___ s i· _ui tl ()> 

f ; ~ ~ { d 

'. ~ l l }{' ' ~ ' 

L t:f ' ' ' 

L ·,: . ' 

\, ·' •<' '• " 

') U.< ( 

,. \'i)!• '. ., 

The known number of E.t.:Od~<:.~i!l comp!L<_tl]CC: .. --·------- Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $577,500 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

' ., ; ~ 

0! ·. 'I 

·. 1 

' 1 : '· 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This .field can also be used to e.:rplain warranty costs): 

I 

~ 
Executive Order 12866: 

t1f:ih 

Could the AD be considered a "significant rcgulatOI)' action'"?~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ., 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

YES* 0 NO fZJ 

YES* D NO fZI 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NO fZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO fZI 

*Explanation:
§ 1277.22 Minimum investment in capital stock. ( a ) A Bank shall require each member to maintain a minimum investment in the capital stock of the Bank, both as a condition to becoming and remaining a member of the Bank and as a condition to transacting business with the Bank or obtaining advances and other services from the Bank. The amount of the required minimum investment shall be determined in accordance with the Bank's capital plan and shall be sufficient to ensure that the Bank remains in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements. A Bank shall require each member to maintain its minimum investment for as long as the institution remains a member of the Bank and shall require each member and former member to maintain its minimum investment for as long as the institution engages in any activity with the Bank for which the capital plan requires the institution to maintain capital stock.
( b ) A Bank may establish the minimum investment as a percentage of the total assets of an institution, as a percentage of the advances outstanding to that institution, as a percentage of any other business activity conducted with the institution, on any other basis that is approved by the Director, or any combination thereof.
( c ) A Bank may require that the minimum investment requirement be satisfied through the purchase of either Class A or Class B stock, or through the purchase of one or more combinations of Class A and Class B stock that have been authorized by the board of directors of the Bank in its capital plan. A Bank, in its discretion, may establish a lower minimum investment to the extent the requirement is met through investment in Class B stock than if the requirement is met through investment in Class A stock, provided that such reduced investment provides sufficient capital for the Bank to remain in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.
( d ) Each member, or if applicable, former member, of a Bank shall at all times maintain an investment in the capital stock of the Bank in an amount that is sufficient to satisfy the minimum investment required under the Bank's capital plan.
# C_2023164EN.01000101.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 164/01)

Last publication

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023

Past publications

OJ C 134, 17.4.2023

OJ C 127, 11.4.2023

OJ C 121, 3.4.2023

OJ C 112, 27.3.2023

OJ C 104, 20.3.2023

OJ C 94, 13.3.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01


                             LXR BIOTECHNOLOGY INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Year Ended          Year Ended         Year Ended
                                      December 31, 1997   December 31, 1996   December 31, 1995
                                      -----------------   -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                  <C>                  <C>                 <C>          
Net loss                                $ (9,270,287)        $ (7,622,999)       $ (6,315,947)
                                        ============         ============        ============
Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding:
Common stock                              22,020,391           15,762,729           7,513,541
Common stock to be issued                    157,600               52,766                  --
                                        ------------         ------------        ------------
                                          22,177,991           15,815,495           7,513,541
                                        ============         ============        ============
Net loss per share                      $       (.42)        $       (.48)       $       (.84)
                                        ============         ============        ============
</TABLE>
#### Solomon L. Pakas, Respondent, v. William E. Hollingshead et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Spiegelberg & Wise (Edmond E. Wise, of counsel), for appellants; Max D. Steuer, for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

No opinion.
Exhibit 10.2 Amendment to Promissory Note





AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE







THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of May 7, 2015 (the “Amendment”) to the Promissory Note referred to below is entered into by and between, McKinley Enterprise, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the “Creditor”) and Jolley Marketing, Inc. (the “Debtor”).




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Promissory Note on February 8, 2012 (the “Note”);




WHEREAS, the original maturity date of the Note was February 8, 2014.




WHEREAS, an amendment to the promissory note was made on November 3, 2014 to extend the 

maturity date to February 8, 2015.




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Note to extend the maturity date thereof.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the receipt of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




MATURITY:  The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to February 8, 2016.




EFFECTIVE DATE:  The effective date of this Amendment shall be May 7, 2015.




GENERAL PROVISIONS:




(a)

Except as amended hereby, the Note shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall not, except as otherwise provided herein, be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any other term or condition of the Note or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which the parties may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Note, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.




(b)

The terms of the Note are incorporated herein by reference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed individually or by its officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the respective dates set forth below.




JOLLEY MARKETING, INC.







Date:  May 7, 2015

/s/  Steve White

By Steve White, President 










McKINLEY ENTERPRISE, INC. PROFIT 

            SHARING PLAN







Date:  May 7, 2015

/s/  David Namelka

By David Namelka, Trustee
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCCC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Company.





graphicName:
Bernard ZimmermanTitle:
President, Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
 Dated:   November 9, 2010
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released December 13, 2022)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-22-163 Hauschildt v. Nebraska Medicine

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.