alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>
         5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
         Superior  Wireless   Communications,   Inc.  June  30,  1997  financial
         statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
         financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                0000793986
<NAME>                               Superior Wireless Communications, Inc.

       

<S>      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                            65
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  482
<PP&E>                                            230,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (143,693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,292,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,635,381
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             6,005
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1,349,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,292,033
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,583
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     157,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  56,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                39,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (192,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (193,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (193,417)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2777 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2777

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of 
   the Federal Reserve System from including any information storage 
capability on the currency of the United States or imposing any fee or 
penalty on any person for the holding by such person of currency of the 
United States, including Federal reserve notes, for any period of time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of 
   the Federal Reserve System from including any information storage 
capability on the currency of the United States or imposing any fee or 
penalty on any person for the holding by such person of currency of the 
United States, including Federal reserve notes, for any period of time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Currency `Carry Tax' Prohibition Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CURRENCY PROVISIONS PROHIBITED.

    (a) United States Currency Notes.--Section 5115 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsections:
    ``(c) Information Storage Capability Prohibited.--The Secretary may 
not include any information storage capability on United States 
currency notes.
    ``(d) Holding Fee Prohibited.--The Secretary may not impose any fee 
or penalty on any person for the holding by such person of any United 
States currency note for any period of time.''.
    (b) Federal Reserve Notes.--
            (1) Information storage capability prohibited.--The 8th 
        undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act 
        (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the following 
        new sentence: ``The Secretary of the Treasury and the Board may 
        not include any information storage capability on any Federal 
        reserve note.''.
            (2) Holding fee prohibited.--The 1st undesignated paragraph 
        of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 411) is 
        amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The 
        Board may not impose any fee or penalty on any person for the 
        holding by such person of any Federal reserve note for any 
        period of time or in connection with a redemption under the 
        preceding sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 192.100 Preparing for a conversion. ( a ) *Meeting with appropriate Federal banking agency prior to passing plan.* A savings association's board, or a subcommittee of its board, must meet, in person or electronically, with the appropriate Federal banking agency before the savings association passes its plan of conversion. At this meeting the savings association must provide the appropriate Federal banking agency with a written strategic plan that outlines the objectives of the proposed conversion and the intended use of the conversion proceeds.
( b ) *Consultation with appropriate Federal banking agency before filing application.* A savings association also should consult with the appropriate Federal banking agency before filing its application for conversion. The appropriate Federal banking agency will discuss the information that the savings association must include in the application for conversion, general issues that it may confront in the conversion process, and any other pertinent issues.
#### § 192.265 Proxies executed under this part.

A savings association may vote a proxy obtained under this part on matters that are incidental to the conduct of the meeting. The savings association may not vote a proxy obtained under this subpart at any meeting other than the meeting (or any adjournment of the meeting) to vote on the plan of conversion.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

April 4 , 2013.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00157

- CR

IN RE LEON HARRISON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 635921



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 26, 2013, relator Leon Harrison filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel Chris Daniel, the Harris County District Clerk, to forward his notice of appeal and “all related documents” in the underlying action to this court. Because the District Clerk has now forwarded relator’s notice of appeal, we dismiss this proceeding as moot.2

This c ourt’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of ap peals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. We ordinarily do not have mandamus juri sdiction over a District Clerk. However, we have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief when a district clerk fails to forward a notice of appeal to the court of appeals because issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Smith
, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding).
The trial court clerk has a mandatory ministerial duty to forward a notice of appeal to the court of appeals. Whitsitt v. Ramsay , 719 S.W.2 d 333, 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (orig. proceeding). On March 21, 2013, the Harris County District Clerk forwarded relator’s notice of appeal to this court, which docketed his appeal as cause number 14

- 13

- 00239

- CR. Because the District Clerk has complie d with his ministerial duty to forward the notice of appeal to the court of appeals, we dismiss this proceeding as moot. As to any additional relief requested, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221.

PER CURIAM

P anel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 1, 2006
____________________
Dean Mitchell 
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 1, 2006
_________________
Matthew T. Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
HomeThird-Party Contractor...Robert Pole

# 									Robert Pole							

DS Memorial

September 7, 2005

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Third-Party Contractor****Year of Death: 2005**

Robert Pole, Private Security Contractor, was killed on September 7, 2005, in Basrah, Iraq, by an improvised explosive device. His hometown is Miller Place, New York.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Third Party ContractorIraq

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Meeting of the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group, 
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, WA

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group, 
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington, 
established by the Secretary of the Interior, will hold a public 
meeting. The purpose of the Conservation Advisory Group is to provide 
technical advice and counsel to the Secretary of the Interior and 
Washington State on the structure, implementation, and oversight of the 
Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program.

DATES: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 9 a.m.-1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Reclamation, Yakima Field Office, 1917 Marsh Road, 
Yakima, Washington.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Walt Larrick, Assistant Program 
Manager, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, 1917 Marsh Road, 
Yakima, Washington, 98901; 509-575-5848, extension 209.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting will be to review 
the option of using the acquired habitat lands to mitigate the impacts 
that occur from the planned conservation measures and develop 
recommendations. This meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: October 23, 2008.
Walter Larrick,
Assistant Program Manager, Pacific Northwest Region.
[FR Doc. E9-24 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2811

To assist local educational agencies in providing financial incentives to attract 

teachers to teach in rural and high-poverty areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2003

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. 

FROST, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, and Mr. THOMPSON of California) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To assist local educational agencies in providing financial 

incentives to attract teachers to teach in rural and highpoverty areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR RECRUITMENT OF 

4 TEACHERS FOR RURAL OR HIGH-POVERTY 

5 AREAS. 

6 Section 2151 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu7 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6651) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new subsection: 
2

•HR 2811 IH 

1 ‘‘(g) FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR RECRUITMENT OF

2 TEACHERS FOR RURAL AND HIGH-POVERTY AREAS.—

3 ‘‘(1) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary is 

4 authorized to make grants to local educational agen5 cies to assist such agencies in recruiting and retain6 ing teachers for high-need schools described in para7 graph (2). 

8 ‘‘(2) HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS.—A high-need 

9 school is an elementary or secondary school that sat10 isfies the following conditions: 

11 ‘‘(A) The school provides a free public edu12 cation. 

13 ‘‘(B) At least 75 percent of the students 

14 attending the school receive a free or reduced15 cost lunch in accordance with the Richard B. 

16 Russell National School Lunch Act. 

17 ‘‘(C) The school has been assigned a school 

18 locale code of 7 or 8, as determined by the Sec19 retary. 

20 ‘‘(3) USE OF GRANTS.—Grants made under this 

21 subsection shall be used to increase the salary of 

22 teachers who are employed full-time in a high-need 

23 school. 

24 ‘‘(4) GRANT AMOUNTS.—Grants under this sub25 section shall be made in the amount of $5000 per 
3

•HR 2811 IH 

1 eligible teacher in the high-need school for which the 

2 grant is made. 

3 ‘‘(5) APPLICATION.—To apply for a grant 

4 under this subsection, a local educational agency 

5 shall submit an application to the Secretary at such 

6 time, in such manner, and containing such informa7 tion as the Secretary may require. Applications for 

8 grants shall be on a per-school basis. 

9 ‘‘(6) RENEWABILITY.—The Secretary may 

10 renew a grant made under this subsection on an an11 nual basis.’’.

Æ
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
Nos. 333-126369, 333-55732, 333-28701, and 333-03631 on Form S-8 of
our report dated March 12, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Riviera Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries (which report
includes explanatory paragraphs related to the adoption of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, on January 1, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Riviera Holding Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2007.




/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP




Las
Vegas, NV


March 31,
2009
§ 1072.101 Purpose. ( a ) This part implements section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, Sec. 119 (Pub. L. 95-602, 92 Stat. 2982), the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-506, 100 Stat. 1810), the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-220, 112 Stat. 936), and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553), to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
( b ) This part is also intended to implement section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended to ensure that employees and members of the public with disabilities have access to, and are able to use, electronic and information technology (EIT) to the same extent as individuals without disabilities, unless an undue burden would be imposed on the department or the Bureau. Specifically, this part clarifies that individuals with disabilities may utilize the complaint procedures established in section 504 to enforce rights guaranteed under section 508.
§ 77.11 Outreach required. ( a ) As a condition of receiving a grant under this part, an eligible entity must agree to conduct a joint outreach campaign with VA to inform all eligible veterans and separating members of the Armed Forces with physical disabilities about the existence of the adaptive sports activities funded by the grant, as appropriate, and shall provide for, facilitate, and encourage participation of such veterans and separating members of the Armed Forces in programs under this part to the extent possible.
( b ) For grantees conducting adaptive sports activities at the community level, outreach must include active liaison with local VA and DoD facilities; State, local, and tribal governments; and VSOs, private agencies, and organizations providing adaptive sport activities to disabled veterans and disabled members of the Armed Forces to be served by the grantee.
( c ) For grantees conducting adaptive sports activities occurring at the national and regional levels, outreach must include active liaison with VA and DoD, State governments, VSOs, and private agencies and organizations providing adaptive sport services to disabled veterans and disabled members of the Armed Forces to be served by the grantee and tailored as appropriate to the deliverables of the grant.
(Authority: 38 USC 521A(e))
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 25, 2010 

# Order

January 25, 2010

140263(7)

IN RE CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

___________________ ____________________ KAREN WAESCHLE, Plaintiff, SC: 140263 v US Dist: 08-10393

OAKLAND COUNTY ME DICAL EXAMINER, and OAKLAND COUNTY, Defendants.

___________________ _____________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion for temporary admission to practice of Patrick J. Perotti and John H. Metz is considered and it is GRANTED.
# C_2012136EN.01000701.xml

| 11.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/7

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for three EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2012

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

2012/C 136/04

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To get the applicable reference rate, appropriate margins have to be added in accordance with the State aid Guidelines. For the discount rate this means that the appropriate margin of 100 basis points has to be added to the base rate. The recovery rate will also normally be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate as foreseen in the Authority’s Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (published in OJ L 340, 22.12.2010, p. 1 and in the EEA Supplement No 72/2010, 22.12.2010, p. 1).

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2012- | 4,70 | 0,31 | 3,57 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2012-

4,70

0,31

3,57

---
The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Easter n 1 District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1133

___________ Jeffrey Holder, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Wal-Mart, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1998 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jeffre yHolder appeals from the district court & s adverse grant of summary 1 judgment in his complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & submissions, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is correct for the reasons set forth in its order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 192.370 Limits on aggregate purchases by officers, directors, and associates.

(a) *In general.* When a savings association converts, its officers, directors, and their associates may not purchase, in the aggregate, more than the following percentage of the savings association's total stock offering:

Table 1 to [§ 192.370](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-192.370)(a)

| Institution size | Officer and director purchases (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| $50,000,000 or less | 35 |
| $50,000,001-100,000,000 | 34 |
| $100,000,001-150,000,000 | 33 |
| $150,000,001-200,000,000 | 32 |
| $200,000,001-250,000,000 | 31 |
| $250,000,001-300,000,000 | 30 |
| $300,000,001-350,000,000 | 29 |
| $350,000,001-400,000,000 | 28 |
| $400,000,001-450,000,000 | 27 |
| $450,000,001-500,000,000 | 26 |
| Over $500,000,000 | 25 |

(b) *Exception.* The purchase limitations in this section do not apply to shares held in tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans that are attributable to the savings association's officers, directors, and their associates.
Exhibit 32.1
 Section 1350 Certification
 
 The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of Bridgeton Tactical Advisors Fund, LP pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridgeton Tactical Advisor Fund, LP
 
 Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ Stephen J. RosemeStephen J. RosemeChief Executive, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer ofBridgeton Fund Management, LLC, the general partner ofBridgeton Tactical Advisors Fund, LP
# C_2022472EN.01000101.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 472/01)

Last publication

OJ C 463, 5.12.2022

Past publications

OJ C 451, 28.11.2022

OJ C 441, 21.11.2022

OJ C 432, 14.11.2022

OJ C 424, 7.11.2022

OJ C 418, 31.10.2022

OJ C 408, 24.10.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---