alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 150.260 How may I invest funds of a fiduciary account? ( a ) *General.* You must invest funds of a fiduciary account in a manner consistent with applicable law.
( b ) *Collective investment funds.* ( 1 ) You may invest funds of a fiduciary account in a collective investment fund, including a collective investment fund that you have established. In establishing and administering such funds, you must comply with 12 CFR 9.18.
( 2 ) If you must file a document with the OCC under 12 CFR 9.18, the OCC may review such documents for compliance with this part and other laws and regulations.
( 3 ) “Bank” and “national bank” as used in 12 CFR 9.18 shall be deemed to include a Federal savings association.
§ 192.285 Prohibited solicitations. ( a ) *False or misleading statements.* ( 1 ) No one may use proxy solicitation material for the members' meeting if the material contains any statement which, considering the time and the circumstances of the statement: ( i ) Is false or misleading with respect to any material fact;
( ii ) Omits any material fact that is necessary to make the statements not false or misleading; or
( iii ) Omits any material fact that is necessary to correct a statement in an earlier communication that has become false or misleading.
( 2 ) No one may represent or imply that the appropriate Federal banking agency determined that the proxy solicitation material is accurate, complete, not false or not misleading, or passed upon the merits of or approved any proposal.
( b ) *Other prohibited solicitations.* No person may solicit: ( 1 ) An undated or post-dated proxy;
( 2 ) A proxy that states it will be dated after the date it is signed by a member;
( 3 ) A proxy that is not revocable at will by the member; or
( 4 ) A proxy that is part of another document or instrument.
# C_2022497EN.01000201.xml

| 30.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 497/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 497/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 December 2022

(2022/C 497/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0649 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88549 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1580 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9840 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,191 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 399,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6855 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,9340 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4475 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2994 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6887 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4360 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 350,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1967 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4151 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 680,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7106 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,367 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,877 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5351 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6510 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,2295 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0649

JPY

Japanese yen

142,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88549

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1580

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9840

ISK

Iceland króna

152,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,191

HUF

Hungarian forint

399,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6855

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

19,9340

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4475

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2994

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6887

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4360

KRW

South Korean won

1 350,18

ZAR

South African rand

18,1967

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4151

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 680,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7106

PHP

Philippine peso

59,367

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,877

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5351

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6510

INR

Indian rupee

88,2295

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 19.24 Scope of document discovery. ( a ) *Limits on discovery* — ( 1 ) Subject to the limitations set out in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, a party to a proceeding under this subpart may obtain document discovery by serving a written request to produce documents. For purposes of a request to produce documents, the term *documents* includes writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, recordings, electronically stored information, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained either directly or, if necessary, after translation by the responding party, into a reasonably usable form.
( 2 ) Discovery by use of deposition is governed by subpart I of this part.
( 3 ) Discovery by use of either interrogatories or requests for admission is not permitted.
( 4 ) Any request to produce documents that calls for irrelevant material; or that is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, unduly burdensome, or repetitive of previous requests, or that seeks to obtain privileged documents will be denied or modified. A request is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, or unduly burdensome if, among other things, it fails to include justifiable limitations on the time period covered and the geographic locations to be searched, or the time provided to respond in the request is inadequate.
( b ) *Relevance.* A party may obtain document discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that has material relevance to the merits of the pending action.
( c ) *Privileged matter.* Privileged documents are not discoverable. Privileges include the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, bank examination privilege, law enforcement privilege, any government's or government agency's deliberative process privilege, and any other privileges the Constitution, any applicable act of Congress, or the principles of common law provide.
( d ) *Time limits.* All document discovery, including all responses to discovery requests, must be completed by the date set by the ALJ and no later than 30 days prior to the date scheduled for the commencement of the hearing, except as provided in the Local Rules. No exceptions to this time limit are permitted, unless the ALJ finds on the record that good cause exists for waiving the requirements of paragraph (d).
# Official Journal L 341/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.341.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 341 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5222 December 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.341.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 341

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5222 December 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/965/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 30 November 2009 on the reference document referred to in Article 27(4) of Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community
  (notified under document C(2009) 8680)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2009/966/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 30 November 2009 adopting Community import decisions for certain chemicals pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Decisions 2000/657/EC, 2001/852/EC, 2003/508/EC, 2004/382/EC and 2005/416/EC | 14 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/965/EC

*

Commission Decision of 30 November 2009 on the reference document referred to in Article 27(4) of Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community
  (notified under document C(2009) 8680)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 8680)

1

2009/966/EC

*

Commission Decision of 30 November 2009 adopting Community import decisions for certain chemicals pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Decisions 2000/657/EC, 2001/852/EC, 2003/508/EC, 2004/382/EC and 2005/416/EC

14

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1278.3 Merger agreement. A merger of Banks under the authority of § 1278.2 shall require a written merger agreement that: ( a ) Has been authorized by the affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum of the board of directors of each Constituent Bank at a meeting on the record and has been executed by authorized signing officers of each Constituent Bank; and
( b ) Sets forth all material terms and conditions of the merger, including, without limitation, provisions addressing each of the following matters— ( 1 ) The proposed Effective Date and the proposed acquisition date for purposes of accounting for the transaction under GAAP, if that date is to be different from the Effective Date;
( 2 ) The proposed organization certificate and bylaws of the Continuing Bank;
( 3 ) The proposed capital structure plan for the Continuing Bank;
( 4 ) The proposed size and structure of the board of directors for the Continuing Bank;
( 5 ) The formula to be used to exchange the stock of the Constituent Banks for the stock of the Continuing Bank, and a provision prohibiting the issuance of fractional shares of stock;
( 6 ) Any conditions that must be satisfied prior to the Effective Date, which must include approval by the Director and ratification by the members of the Constituent Banks;
( 7 ) A statement of the representations or warranties, if any, made or to be made by any Constituent Bank;
( 8 ) A description of the legal or accounting opinions or rulings, if any, that are required to be obtained or furnished by any party in connection with the proposed merger; and
( 9 ) A statement that the board of directors of a Constituent Bank may terminate the merger agreement before the Effective Date upon a determination that: ( i ) The information disclosed to members contained material errors or omissions;
( ii ) Material misrepresentations were made to members regarding the impact of the merger;
( iii ) Fraudulent activities were used to obtain members' approval; or
( iv ) An event occurred subsequent to the members' vote that would have a significant adverse impact on the future viability of the Continuing Bank.
41876.

#### SMITH et al. v. SHARPE.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

T. Malone Sharpe brought this action against D. B. Smith and J. H. Smith to recover attorney’s fees for legal services rendered by Sharpe. The evidence showed that Pauline Morgan and Mrs. Laurie Moses sued the Smiths to enjoin them from cutting timber on certain land and to adjudicate title to the land. Sharpe agreed to represent the Smiths as their attorney for a fee of $500. At that time the amount of land involved in the dispute was one tract of 37.2' acres. Later, Pauline Morgan and Mrs. Moses amended their petition to bring into controversy numerous tracts comprising several hundred acres. The evidence thus authorized the jury to find the plaintiff here rendered additional necessary services not contemplated by the original agreement between plaintiff and defendants and to return a verdict for plaintiff of $1,000, which included an amount *839for the additional services on a quantum meruit basis, less a credit of $300 which had been previously paid to plaintiff. Where one contracts to render services to another and performs additional services which are not contemplated in the original agreement and which are accepted by the latter, a promise is implied to pay the reasonable value of the additional services and a recovery in quantum meruit is authorized. *Code*§ 3-107; *Rushing v. Jones,*68 Ga. App. 300 (22 SE2d 675); *Wyatt v. Murray,*90 Ga. App. 138, 141 (4) (82 SE2d 159). The defendants’ enumerations of error are without merit.

Submitted March 9, 1966

Decided June 16, 1966.

*Ralph U. Bacon,*for appellants.

*T. Malone Sharpe,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
# C_2022359EN.01000201.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/2

---

Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court

(2022/C 359/02)

Following their appointment as Judges at the General Court of the European Union for the period from 30 June 2022 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 June 2022, (1) Ms Beatrix Ricziová and Mr Tihamér Tóth took the oath before the Court of Justice on 6 July 2022.

---

(1)  OJ L 173, 30.6.2022, p. 77.

---
§ 1235.7 Supervisory action. ( a ) *Supervisory action.* Failure by a regulated entity or the Office of Finance to comply with this part may subject the regulated entity or the Office of Finance or the board members, officers, or employees thereof to supervisory action by FHFA under the Safety and Soundness Act, including but not limited to cease-and-desist proceedings, temporary cease-and-desist proceedings, and civil money penalties.
( b ) *No limitation of authority.* This part does not limit or restrict the authority of FHFA to act under its safety and soundness mandate, in accordance with the Safety and Soundness Act. Such authority includes, but is not limited to, conducting examinations, requiring reports and disclosures, and enforcing compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Madeco S.A.

| | 
| | 

|Name                             | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Soinmad S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Cotelsa S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Colada Continua Chilena S.A.     | Chile                        
|Ficap S.A.                       | Brazil                       
|Optel Ltda.                      | Brazil                       
|Madeco Brasil Ltda.              | Brazil                       
|Indeco S.A.                      | Peru                         
|Cobrecon S.A.                    | Peru                         
|Cedsa S.A.                       | Colombia                     
|Metalurgica e Industrial S.A.    | Argentina                    
|Metacab S.A.                     | Argentina                    
|H.B. San Luis S.A.               | Argentina                    
|Comercial Madeco S.A.            | Argentina                    
|Optel Argentina S.A.             | Argentina                    
|Indelqui S.A.                    | Argentina                    
|Madeco Overseas S.A.             | Cayman Islands               
|Invercable S.A.                  | Chile                        
|Madeco Cables S.A.               | Chile                        
|Metal Overseas S.A.              | Cayman Islands               
|Madeco S.A. Agencia Islas Caiman | Cayman Islands               
|Armat S.A.                       | Chile                        
|Decker Indelqui S.A.             | Argentina                    
|Madeco Brass Mills S.A.          | Chile                        
|Alusa S.A.                       | Chile                        
|Alufoil S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Inversiones Alusa S.A.           | Chile                        
|Peruplast S.A.                   | Peru                         
|Aluflex S.A.                     | Argentina                    
|Alusa Overseas                   | Cayman Islands               
|Indalum S.A.                     | Chile                        
|Alumco S.A.                      | Chile                        
|Inversiones Alumco S.A.          | Chile                        
|Ingewall S.A.                    | Chile                        
|PVTEC S.A.                       | Chile
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JOE AB B O TT, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. E. TOOTELL, Doc tor; J. GR ANT, Doc tor, De fe nda

nts - Appe lla

nts. No. 14-15599

D.C . No. 5:11-c v-00183-LHK
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia L uc y H. Koh, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. De fe nda nts Drs. Gra

nt a n d Toote ll a

ppe a l from

the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of the i r m otion for sum

m ary judgm e nt on theground of qua lifie d im m unity . W e have jurisdic tion ove r this inte rloc utory a ppe a l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. Mitc he ll
v . Forsy t h , 472 U.S. 511, 526-27 (1985). W e re vie w de novo thedistric t c o urt’ s



# FIL ED JAN 27 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).ruling on qualifie d im m unity , Ge orgev . Edholm , 752 F.3d 1206, 1214 (9th C ir. 2014), a nd we a ffirm
. The distric t c ourt prope rly de nie d sum

m ary judgm e nt to de fe nda

nts Gra nt
and Toote ll on Abbott’ s Eighth Am e ndm e n t de libe ra te indiffe re nc e c la im be c a use Abbott ra ise d a

ge nuine dispute of m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda

nts a c te d with de libe ra te indiffe re nc e to his shoulde r pa in. Se e Farme r v . Bre n nan , 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (to e s ta

blish a n Eighth Am e ndm e nt c l a im , a prison “ offic ia l m ust both be aware of fa c ts from whic h the infe re nc e c ould be draw n tha t a substa ntia l risk of se rious ha

rm e xists, a nd he m ust a lso dra

w the infe re nc e .” ). M ore ove r, the la w wa s c le arly

e sta blishe d at the tim e of de fe n da nts’ c onduc t tha

t knowle dge and
c onsc i ous disre ga

rd of “ a n e xc e ssive risk to inmate he a lth” viola te s the Eighth Am e ndm e nt. Id. ; se ealso Ashc roft v . al-K idd, 131 S. C t. 2074, 2080, 2083 (2011) (se tting forth qualifie d im m unity te st a nd re c ogniz i ng tha

t a c le arly e sta blishe d right doe s “ not re quire a

c a se dire c tly

on point” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 4
- 1 5 5 9 9 2
#### § 1805.101 Summary.

Through the Community Development Financial Institutions Program, the CDFI Fund provides financial and technical assistance to Recipients selected by the CDFI Fund in order to enhance their ability to provide Financial Products, Financial Services and Development Services to and in their Target Markets. Each Recipient must serve an Investment Area(s), a Targeted Population(s), or both. The CDFI Fund will select Recipients to receive financial or technical assistance through a merit-based, qualitative application process. Each Recipient must enter into an Assistance Agreement that requires it to achieve specific performance goals and abide by other terms and conditions pertinent to any assistance received under this part, as well as the Uniform Requirements, as applicable. All CDFI Program awards shall be made subject to funding availability.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1833** 

JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES ,

Petitioners

– Appellants ,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

. ( Tax Ct. No. 3685

- 11 )

Submitted : November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013

Before WYNN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Carol Barthel, Randolph Lyons Hutter, Kathryn Keneally , Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C. , for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preceden t in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal

from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s
determination of a deficiency and accuracy

- related penalty with
respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Yates v.

Comm ’r of Internal Revenue , Tax Ct. No. 3685

- 11 (U.S. Tax Ct.
Mar. 28. 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1213.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the term:

*Business relationship* means any existing or potential interaction between a person and a regulated entity or the Office of Finance for the provision of goods or services. The term *business relationship* does not include any interaction between a mortgagor and a regulated entity that directly or indirectly owns, purchased, guarantees, or sold the mortgage.

*Director* means the Director of FHFA or his or her designee.

*FHFA* means the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

*Office of Finance* means the Office of Finance of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.

*Person* means an organization, business entity, or individual that has a business relationship with a regulated entity or the Office of Finance, or that represents the interests of a person that has a business relationship with a regulated entity or the Office of Finance. The term *person* does not include an individual borrower.

*Regulated entity* means the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate, and any Federal Home Loan Bank.
§ 210.29 Agreement of receiving bank. ( a ) *Payment.* A receiving bank (other than a Federal Reserve Bank) that receives a payment order from its Federal Reserve Bank authorizes that Federal Reserve Bank to pay for the payment order by crediting the amount of the payment order to the receiving bank's account.
( b ) *Off-line banks.* An off-line bank that does not expressly notify its Federal Reserve Bank in writing that it maintains an account for another bank warrants to that Federal Reserve Bank that the off-line bank does not act as an intermediary bank or a beneficiary's bank with respect to payment orders received through the Fedwire Funds Service for a beneficiary that is a bank.
[55 FR 40801, Oct. 5, 1990; 55 FR 47428, Nov. 13, 1990, as amended by Reg. J, 83 FR 61522, Nov. 30, 2018]