alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023249EN.01000701.xml

| 14.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 July 2023

(2023/C 249/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1182 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4523 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85553 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,5100 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9644 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,752 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 375,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4323 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9433 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,2478 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6299 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4714 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7481 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7580 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4816 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 418,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,2148 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0098 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 727,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1280 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,780 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,667 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3747 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9248 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 91,7935 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1182

JPY

Japanese yen

154,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4523

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85553

SEK

Swedish krona

11,5100

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9644

ISK

Iceland króna

146,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,752

HUF

Hungarian forint

375,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4323

RON

Romanian leu

4,9433

TRY

Turkish lira

29,2478

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6299

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4714

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7481

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7580

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4816

KRW

South Korean won

1 418,67

ZAR

South African rand

20,2148

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0098

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 727,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1280

PHP

Philippine peso

60,780

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,667

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3747

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9248

INR

Indian rupee

91,7935

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
```

[Federal Register: July 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 135)]
[Notices]               
[Page 41274]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15jy10-113]                         

[[Page 41274]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7089]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The World of Khubilai Khan: Chinese Art in the Yuan 
Dynasty''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 15, 2010, notice was published on pages 19668-19669 
of the Federal Register (volume 75, number 72) of determination made by 
the Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ``From Xanadu to 
Dadu: The World of Khubilai Khan.'' The reference notice is corrected 
to accommodate additional objects to be included in the exhibition, and 
the exhibit name is now titled, ``The World of Khubilai Khan: Chinese 
Art in the Yuan Dynasty.'' Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 
the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive 
Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby 
determine that the additional objects to be included in the exhibition 
``The World of Khubilai Khan: Chinese Art in the Yuan Dynasty,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The additional objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit 
objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or 
about September 28, 2010, until on or about January 2, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: July 9, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-17308 Filed 7-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
§ 1282.62 Mortgage reports. ( a ) *Loan-level data elements.* To implement the data collection and submission requirements for mortgage data, and to assist the Director in monitoring the Enterprises' housing goal activities, each Enterprise shall collect and compile computerized loan-level data on each mortgage purchased in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1456(e) and 1723a(m). The Director may, from time to time, issue a list entitled “Required Loan-level Data Elements” specifying the loan-level data elements to be collected and maintained by the Enterprises and provided to the Director. The Director may revise the list by written notice to the Enterprises.
( b ) *Quarterly Mortgage Reports.* Each Enterprise shall submit to the Director a quarterly Mortgage Report. The fourth quarter Mortgage Report shall serve as the Annual Mortgage Report and shall be designated as such. Each Mortgage Report shall include: ( 1 ) Aggregations of the loan-level mortgage data compiled by the Enterprise under paragraph (a) of this section for year-to-date mortgage purchases, in the format specified in writing by the Director;
( 2 ) Year-to-date dollar volume, number of units, and number of mortgages on owner-occupied and rental properties purchased by the Enterprise that do, and do not, qualify under each housing goal as set forth in this part; and
( 3 ) Year-to-date computerized loan-level data consisting of the data elements required under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Timing of Reports.* The Enterprises shall submit the Mortgage Report for each of the first 3 quarters of each year within 60 days of the end of the quarter. Each Enterprise shall submit its Annual Mortgage Report within 75 days after the end of the calendar year.
( d ) *Revisions to Reports.* At any time before submission of its Annual Mortgage Report, an Enterprise may revise any of its quarterly reports for that year.
( e ) *Format.* The Enterprises shall submit to the Director computerized loan-level data with the Mortgage Report, in the format specified in writing by the Director.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by FCCC, Inc. (the
Registrant), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President ,Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Registrant.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 
| | 

| | Name: Bernard Zimmerman                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 8, 2007

---
§ 16.32 Fraudulent transactions and unsafe or unsound practices. ( a ) No person in the offer or sale of national bank or Federal savings association securities shall directly or indirectly: ( 1 ) Employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud;
( 2 ) Make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
( 3 ) Engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security of a national bank or Federal savings association.
( b ) Nothing in this section limits the applicability of section 17 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77q) or section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78j) or Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 CFR 240.10b-5).
( c ) Any violation of this section also constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice under 12 U.S.C. 1818.
( d ) SEC Rule 175 (17 CFR 230.175—Liability for certain statements by issuers) applies to this part.
[59 FR 54798, Nov. 2, 1994, as amended at 82 FR 8109, Jan. 23, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations found on pages 3, 4 and 5 of the Company's Form 10-QSB
for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         829,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,505,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,058,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,436,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,861,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,869,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,871,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,461,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,861,000 
<SALES>                                      3,756,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,236,000
<CGS>                                        2,959,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,959,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,377,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (100,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (100,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38,000)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                         433,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,844,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                   229,315
<INVENTORY>                                 11,086,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,765,462
<PP&E>                                      13,062,176
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,335,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,570,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,576,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,490
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,336,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,570,100
<SALES>                                     36,521,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,521,094
<CGS>                                       22,138,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,562,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,771)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,773,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,137,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,636,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,636,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10587

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS DIAZ CARDOZO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-340-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Diaz Cardozo appeals the 27-month sentence imposed in 

connection with his conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. He 

argues that the district court plainly erred in applying the eight-level 

enhancement under former U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2015). He contends that 

his prior conviction under Texas Penal Code (TPC) § 46.04 does not qualify as 

an aggravated felony because the Texas definitions of felony and firearm are 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 9, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10587 Document: 00514108664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2017
No. 16-10587

2

broader than the definitions of those terms in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He 

concedes that this court rejected these arguments in the recent decision of 

United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218, 226 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc), 

petition for cert. filed (June 28, 2017) (No. 17-5054), and he raises the issue 

merely to preserve it for further review. The Government has filed an 

unopposed motion for summary affirmance.

Summary affirmance is proper where, among other instances, “the 

position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there 

can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke 

Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The summary 

procedure is generally reserved for cases in which the parties concede that the 

issues are foreclosed by circuit precedent. See United States v. Lopez, 461 F. 

App’x 372, 374 n.6 (5th Cir. 2012).

The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the district 

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. 

 Case: 16-10587 Document: 00514108664 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2017
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6362
In Re: EL SHADDAI MASADA, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-2536-9-17BG) Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 8, 2002 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. El Shaddai Masada, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: El Shaddai Masada filed this mandamus petition seeking to compel the district court to reinstate two dismissed defendants in his civil action. Mandamus is a drastic remedy only to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought and there are no other adequate means for obtaining the requested relief. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980); Beard , 811 F.2d at 826. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Because Masada has not demonstrated both a clear right to relief and the absence of other means to obtain the relief, we deny the petition. We grant Masada’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Masada’s motion for recusal of the magistrate judge, for sanctions, and to consolidate this case with another mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 100.2 Waiver authority.

The Comptroller of the Currency may, for good cause and to the extent permitted by statute, waive the applicability of any provision of parts 1 through 197 of this chapter I, as applicable, with respect to Federal savings associations.

[76 FR 48956, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 28479, May 18, 2015]
ndards Rule Meeting Log 

ce meetings and conference calls between EPA personnel and non-government stakeholders following signature 

sed Rulemaking on July 20, 2010 (75 FR 42238). 

Location: DC and Video Conf to AA 

avid Korotney, Lester 

, Paul Machiele 

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation: Michael A. Berson Kinghorn, Hilbert & Associates, LLC 

 

discuss their new Bioenergy and Bioproducts Center. 

gasification unit designed in partnership with Community Power Company 

Location: Conference call 

avid Korotney, Lester 

, Jarrod Brown 

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation: Carl Kelley Nature's Fuels 

 

hnology, RFS regulations for registration, and participation in the RFS program 
Location: Conference call 

rrod Brown, Lester 

ele, Robert Larson, 

Camobreco 

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation: Patrick Wright Range Fuels 

 

gy for producing cellulosic methanol and ethanol. Options for generation RINs. 

Location: Conference call 

d Korotney, Meg 

rauch, Robert Larson, 

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation: Southwest Georgia Ethanol
§ 19.20 Amended pleadings. ( a ) *Amendments.* The notice or answer may be amended or supplemented at any stage of the proceeding. The respondent must answer an amended notice within the time remaining for the respondent's answer to the original notice, or within ten days after service of the amended notice, whichever period is longer, unless the Comptroller or ALJ orders otherwise for good cause.
( b ) *Amendments to conform to the evidence.* When issues not raised in the notice or answer are tried at the hearing by express or implied consent of the parties, they will be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the notice or answer, and no formal amendments are required. If evidence is objected to at the hearing on the ground that it is not within the issues raised by the notice or answer, the ALJ may admit the evidence when admission is likely to assist in adjudicating the merits of the action and the objecting party fails to satisfy the ALJ that the admission of such evidence would unfairly prejudice that party's action or defense upon the merits. The ALJ may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.
42373.

#### THONI OIL MAGIC BENZOL GAS STATIONS, INC. v. KIMSEY.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

It is undisputed in this case that the employer was a corporation; that the deceased was an employee of the corporation; and that the notice of rejection of the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, filed with the board and posted on the corporate premises where the *639employee was killed, was signed in the name of an individual only and contained no reference whatsoever to the corporate employer. *Held:*

Argued October 5, 1966

Decided November 1, 1966

Rehearing denied November 16, 1966.

*Wallace, Wallace & Driebe, Charles J. Driebe,*for appellant.

*Quillian & Quillian, Kelley Quillian, Sam G. Dettelbach,*for appellee.

Under these facts the notice of rejection did not purport to be an undertaking of the corporation but merely the individual undertaking of the signer. See *Broyles v. Kirkwood Court Apartments,*97 Ga. App. 384 (103 SE2d 97). A corporation is an artificial person created by law. The corporate identity is entirely separate from the identity of its officers and stockholders. A corporation and even its sole owner are two separate and distinct persons. *Waycross Air-Line R. Co. v. Offerman & W. R. Co.,*109 Ga. 827 (35 SE 275); *Newton Mfg. Co. v. White,*42 Ga. 148; *Shingler v. Shingler,*184 Ga. 671 (3) (192 SE 824); *Garmany v. Lawton,*124 Ga. 876, 879 (1) (53 SE 669, 110 ASR 207).

The trial judge properly affirmed the award of the board based on its finding that the corporate employer had not rejected the Act and was bound by its terms.

It is unnecessary to consider the remaining enumeration of error as the question it raises is moot.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GTDATA CORP. (the
"COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Robert
Genesi, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge
that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
Robert Genesi
 
 Robert
Genesi
 Principal
Executive Officer
 Principal
Financial Officer
 
 Dated:
August 15, 2005
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
GTDATA CORP. and will be retained by GTDATA CORP. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.