alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007091EN.01003301.xml

| 26.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/33

---

Public holidays in 2007: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions

(2007/C 91/09)

| 2007 | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 January | X | X | X | X | X |
| 2 January | | X | | | |
| 6 January | | X | | | |
| 2 February | | X | | | |
| 20 February | | X | | | |
| 19 March | | X | | | |
| 5 April | X | | X | | |
| 6 April | X | X | X | X | |
| 9 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| 19 April | X | | | | |
| 1 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 17 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 18 May | | | | X | |
| 28 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 7 June | | X | | | |
| 17 June | X | | | | |
| 23 June | | | | | X |
| 6 August | X | | | | |
| 15 August | | X | | | X |
| 8 September | | X | | | |
| 1 November | | X | | X | X |
| 8 December | | X | | | |
| 24 December | | X | | | |
| 25 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 26 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 31 December | | X | | | |

2007

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

1 January

X

X

X

X

X

2 January

X

6 January

X

2 February

X

20 February

X

19 March

X

5 April

X

X

6 April

X

X

X

X

9 April

X

X

X

X

X

19 April

X

1 May

X

X

X

X

X

17 May

X

X

X

X

X

18 May

X

28 May

X

X

X

X

X

7 June

X

17 June

X

23 June

X

6 August

X

15 August

X

X

8 September

X

1 November

X

X

X

8 December

X

24 December

X

25 December

X

X

X

X

X

26 December

X

X

X

X

X

31 December

X

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00169-REB-MEH WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff,
v. KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 13, 2010. The Federal Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Temporarily Stay All Proceedings [filed April 12, 2010; docket #10 ] is granted . All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed , pending a decision on the Federal Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Actions by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The partie s shall file a status report within five business days upon receipt of the Judicial Panel’s decision. The Scheduling Conference set for April 22, 2010, is vacated
.
#### § 161.44 Security.

The term *security* means any non-withdrawable account, note, stock, treasury stock, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a *security,* or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing, except that a *security* shall not include an account or deposit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENT FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               455,154
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      5,443,837
<ALLOWANCES>                         110,497
<INVENTORY>                           86,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   6,638,154
<PP&E>                             7,637,067
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,364,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    17,261,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              5,554,551
<BONDS>                            3,009,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              40,884
<OTHER-SE>                         8,276,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      17,261,521
<SALES>                           11,681,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  11,681,802
<CGS>                              1,822,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      7,387,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   3,675,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   198,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      420,661
<INCOME-TAX>                         168,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  252,663
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         252,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,888,908
<SECURITIES>                                 8,768,468
<RECEIVABLES>                                 (32,609)
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,383,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,008,095
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,008,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        (488,155)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,519,939
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      4,677,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,677,547
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (996,116)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,681,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,681,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 192.520 Declaring and paying dividends after the conversion. A savings association may declare or pay a dividend on its shares after the conversion if: ( a ) The dividend will not reduce the savings association's regulatory capital below the amount required for the liquidation account under § 192.450;
( b ) The savings association complies with all capital requirements under 12 CFR part 3 after it declares or pays dividends;
( c ) The savings association complies with the capital distribution requirements under 12 CFR 5.55; and
( d ) The savings association does not return any capital, other than ordinary dividends, to purchasers during the term of the business plan submitted with the conversion.
#### Louis Mishner, Respondent, v. The Singer Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff. Benjamin L. Brandner (George Hahn, of counsel for appellant; Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel,) for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

No opinion.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

1 

# COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 2022 KW 1251 DONALD BOYLE 

### JANUARY 17, 2023 In Re: 

### Donald Boyle, applying for supervisory Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 0400-F-2019. BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, 

# ~.sJ DEPUTY CLERK FOR THEFIRST CIRCUIT OF COURT COURT MRT WRC CHH 

### writs, Tammany, 22nd No.
CONSULTING AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
This  Consulting  and  Services Agreement (this  "Agreement")  is
entered  into  as  of  June 10,2000 between  eConnect,  a  Nevada
corporation, (the "Company" and Louis Sabatasso, ("Consultant").
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.  Term. The Company hereby retains Consultant as an independent
consultant,  with the duties particularized in Section  2  hereof
and  subject to other terms and conditions particularized herein,
and  Consultant hereby agrees to act as such for the Company, for
the  period  commencing on the date hereof and  expiring  on  the
completion by Consultant of the Services (as defined in Section 2
hereof).
2.   Duties.  During  the  Term,  Consultant  shall  devote   his
reasonable  best efforts to Performing the Services  (as  defined
hereinbelow)  on behalf of the Company, at such reasonable  times
and  places  as determined by Consultant. The Company understands
and  hereby  expressly  acknowledges  that  the  Services  to  be
provided  to  the  Company by Consultant pursuant  to  the  terms
hereof  shall be on a non- exclusive basis only. As  employed  in
this  Agreement,  Services shall mean:  Gaming  consulting,  with
specific  focus  on  the  selling of the eCashPad  to  Las  Vegas
casinos.
3.  Consideration to Consultant for Services. In consideration of
the Services to be rendered by Consultant to the Company pursuant
to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company shall  pay  Consultant  the
issuance of 300,000 S-8 consultant free trading shares,  in  lieu
of cash payment.
4.  Representation of Authority. The Company and Consultant  each
hereby  represents and warrants that has the necessary power  and
authority  to enter into and deliver this Agreement,  to  perform
its  obligations  hereunder  and to  consummate  the  transaction
contemplated  hereby,  and  that  such  actions  have  been  duly
authorized  by, respectively, the Company and the  Consultant  in
accordance with applicable law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed
this  Consulting  and Services Agreement as  of  the  date  first
written above.
"THE COMPANY"
eConnect
Name: /s/ Thomas S. Hughes
Title: Chairman & CEO
"CONSULTANT"
By: /s/ Louis Sabatasso
Name: Louis Sabatasso    6/26/2000
#### § 219.24 Retention period.

All records that are required to be retained by this subpart shall be retained for a period of five years. All these records shall be filed or stored in such a way as to be accessible within a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the record and the amount of time that has expired since the record was made. Any records required to be retained by this subpart shall be made available to the Board upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I,
Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: 7/30/2007



/S/    MICHAEL MAZZONIMichael Mazzoni,Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008040EN.01001501.xml

| 14.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/15

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Follo tingrett dated 24 October 2007 in the Case of L'Oréal Norge AS v Per Aarskog AS and others

(Case E-9/07)

(2008/C 40/06)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 24 October 2007 from Follo tingrett (Follo District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 31 October 2007, for an Advisory Opinion in the Case of L'Oréal Norge AS v Per Aarskog AS and others, on the following questions:

| 1. | Is Article 7(1) of Council Directive 89/104/EEC to be understood to the effect that a trade mark proprietor has the right to prevent imports from third countries outside the EEA when such imports take place without the consent of the trade mark proprietor? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 7(1) of Council Directive 89/104/EEC to be understood to the effect that a trade mark proprietor has the right to prevent imports from third countries outside the EEA when such imports take place without the consent of the trade mark proprietor?

| 2. | Is Article 7(1) of Directive 89/104/EEC to be understood to the effect that international exhaustion is permitted? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 7(1) of Directive 89/104/EEC to be understood to the effect that international exhaustion is permitted?

---
#### Morris Markowitz, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion made to set aside a verdict on the ground of newly-discovered evidence and surprise.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, of counsel), for appellant.

Julius H. Cohn, for respondent.

Conlan, J.

The cause was tried and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff.

Upon the trial, a witness for the defendant, the doctor, testified in effect that the case had been settled prior to the trial, and there*752after the defendant moved for a new trial at Special Term, and asked leave to serve a supplemental answer, which set forth a general release claimed to have been executed and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant for the alleged consideration of $115.

There is a significant fact connected with this case which we are in no disposition to overlook. It appears that the doctor also furnished to the plaintiff a memorandum, in writing upon an occasion when some money was handed to the plaintiff, which might be termed an emergency fee, if no stronger characterization be applied, and which amounted to $10, and the release at the same time mentions the sum of $115 as being the sum paid.

The plaintiff, in his affidavit, details all the circumstances which surrounded this somewhat mysterious transaction, and asserts his ignorance of the paper presented by the defendant, and of his inability to understand, writing beyond a few letters or characters in the Hebrew language.

This whole transaction does not call for the least particle of sympathy, and does not commend itself to the favor of the court. Transactions between the opposing parties to a suit of this character, even if carried on without the knowledge of the attorney, must be, in all respects, fair and just, and able to stand the light of day. No advantage which is taken or attempted upon the guileless and innocent, or unlettered and ignorant will be upheld by the court when its authority is invoked to interfere to prevent a wrong.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GTDATA CORPORATION
(the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Robert
Genesi,  Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial Officer of the
Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  do  hereby  certify,  to my knowledge that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert Genesi
--------------------------------------------
Robert  Genesi
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated:     August  20,  2004
A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  GTDATA  CORPORATION and will be retained by GTDATA CORPORATION and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
427 A.2d 243

#### Commonwealth v. Jackson, Appellant.

Submitted November 16, 1979.

John H. Corbett, Jr., for appellant;

Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Order entered October 16, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 00954 - CV MICHAEL MILLER, Appellant

V. GEORGE M. HARIZ, M.D ., ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from t he County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 15 - 04020 - D



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 12, 2017 agreed first motion seeking a sixty

- day extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion TO THE EXTENT tha t appellant shall file a brief by November 15, 2017

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### § 1808.625 CDFI Fund deemed not to control.

The CDFI Fund shall not be deemed to control a CDFI Bond Guarantee Program participant by reason of any Guarantee provided under the Act for the purpose of any applicable law.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed February 26, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00491-CV
LAGATHRE DENISE MOORE, Appellant V. BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AN D BRADLEY BOYTE, Appellees
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-15441-E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright a nd Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellee Baylor Health Care System moves to dismiss this appeal, noting appellant has
failed to pay the fee for the clerk’s record desp ite being cautioned that the appeal would be
dismissed for want of prosecution if she did not pay the fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
The motion reflects Baylor’s couns el conferred with appellant’s counsel, and appellant does not
oppose the motion. Accordingly, we gran t the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

.
P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

130491F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

LAGATHRE DENISE MOORE, Appellant

No. 05-13-00491-CV V.

BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AND BRADLEY BOYTE, Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-15441-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellees Baylor Health Care System and Bradley Boyte recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Lagathre Denise Moore.

Judgment entered February 26, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2005135EN.01001501.xml

| 2.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/15

---

Announcement from Norway concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 may 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

Announcement of invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf — Awards in Predefined Areas 2005

(2005/C 135/07)

The Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy hereby announces an invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf in accordance with Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons, Article 3, para 2, litra a).

Applications for petroleum production licences shall be submitted to

| The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
| --- |
| PB 8148 Dep. |
| N-0033 OSLO |

The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

PB 8148 Dep.

N-0033 OSLO

by 30 September 2005.

The award of petroleum production licences in the Awards in Predefined Areas 2005 on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is planned to take place in December 2005.

Further information may be obtained by contacting the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, tel. (47) 22 24 63 33.

---