CALIFORNIAAIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST
*** 

### TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICTAND RETURNED TO ARB *** All rules submitted tothe EPAas State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information and documentation for the rule packagesto be deemed completefor review by the EPA. Ruleswill not beevaluatedforApprovability by the EPA unlessthe submittal packages are complete. To assistyou in determining thatall necessary materialsare included in rules packages senttheARB for submittaltothe EPA, please fill outthe following formand include itwith the rule packageyou sendARB. SeetheARB's Guidelines on the Implementation ofthe EPA's DraftSIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, for a more detailed explanation than is provided here. Agency: California Air Resources Board
Rule No: Title 17, CaliforniaCodeofRegulations, Subchapter8.5, sections 94508-94517 (Article2. Consumer Products. (the "Consumer Products Regulation").
Rule Title: Article 2 "Consumer Products"
DateAdopted orAmended: Hearing Date Adopted Amended OALApproval Implementation
June26, 2008 NA 05-05-09 06-18-09 12-31-10to 12-31-15



### Attached (x) 

### Not Attached 

### () N/A 

### \) ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

COMPLETE COpy OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the

entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board. (x) 

### ( ) ( ) UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COpy OF THE RULE: If an amended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout format all languagewhich has been added, deleted, orchanged sincethe rulewas lastadopted oramended. 

# o (x) 

# o COMPLETE COpyOF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): Forany rulewhich includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitted to EPAas partofa previous SIP submittal. (x) 

### () () PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of pUblication, which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy ofthe actual pUblished notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however. enough of the newspaper page must be included to show the date of publication. the notice must specifically identify by title and numbereach rule adopted oramended. (x) 

### () 

### () RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the information in the public notice. It mustalso list the rules thatwereadopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725-40728 (Administrative ProceduresAct). (x) 

### () 

# o PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies ofwritten public comments made during the notice period and atthe pUblic hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public comments and responses is adequate. Iftherewere no comments made during the notice period oratthe hearing, please indicate 

### N/A to the left.

### CALIFORNIAAIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

Not Attached Attached (x) 

### ()
() ( )

() ()



# o ()

(x) 

### ()

(ARBFORM

- 6/93) 

### TECHNICAL MATERIALS



### NJA 

# "0 RULE EVALUATION FORM: 

### See instructions for completing the Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sampleform. (x) 

### NON-EPA TEST METHOD: 

### Include all test methods that are referenced in the rule, but not previously submitted to EPA. Provide an explanaton ofthe purpose and principle for the test method and include the following supporting technical data: describethetest details (numberoftests to be carried out, their precision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical basis, compare the method with the appropriate EPAIASTM method; explain the technical differences ofthe two methods and howthey affect monitoring of the parameters of interest; explain how the test method affects the implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule; explain the advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test method. (x) 

### MODELING SUPPORT: 

### Provide if appropriate; in general modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources**(~** 

### 100 TPY) in an attainment area for S02, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx (for N02 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. Ifcurrent EPA modeling guidelineswere not used, then new modeling may be required. (x) 

### ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM EPA POLICIES: 

### As appropriate, describe special circumstances, Le., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance data are included, etc. A completed SIP Approvability Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this reqUirement. 

### () ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: 

### Provide any other supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes, such as staff reports.