alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO.  23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Amendment on Form S-3 to Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 (File No. 333-83385) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-25887, 333-56973, 333-33930 and 333-50136) filed by Global Capital
Partners Inc., of our report dated June 25, 2001 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Global Capital Partners Inc. and Subsidiaries, which
report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (this "Annual Report") of
Global Capital Partners Inc. for the years ended March 31, 2001 and 2000.




                                                     /s/ Spicer, Jeffries & Co.

                                                     SPICER, JEFFRIES & CO.

Denver, Colorado
June 29, 2001
§ 1808.401 Application requirements. ( a ) *Qualified Issuer Application.* A Qualified Issuer applicant shall provide all required information in its Qualified Issuer Application to establish that it meets all criteria for designation as a Qualified Issuer and can carry out all Qualified Issuer responsibilities and requirements including, but not limited to, information that demonstrates that the applicant has the appropriate expertise, capacity, and experience and is qualified to make, administer and service Bond Loans for Eligible Purposes. After receipt of a Qualified Issuer Application, the CDFI Fund may request additional information and clarifying or technical information on the materials submitted as part of the Qualified Issuer Application. The CDFI Fund will provide the template for the Qualified Issuer Application.
( b ) *Guarantee Application.* ( 1 ) A Qualified Issuer shall provide all required information in its Guarantee Application to establish that it meets all criteria set forth in this interim rule to receive a Guarantee and can carry out all Guarantee requirements including, but not limited to, information that demonstrates that the Qualified Issuer has the appropriate expertise, capacity, and experience and is qualified to make, administer and service Bond Loans for Eligible Purposes. The Guarantee Application shall include a Capital Distribution Plan and a Secondary Capital Distribution Plan for each potential Eligible CDFI, as well as any other requirements set forth in the applicable Notice of Guarantee Availability or as may be required by the CDFI Fund in its sole discretion for the evaluation and selection of Guarantee applicants. After receipt of a Guarantee Application, the CDFI Fund may request additional information and clarifying or technical information on the materials submitted as part of the Guarantee Application. The CDFI Fund will provide the template for the Guarantee Application.
( 2 ) The Capital Distribution Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: ( i ) Statement of Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds;
( ii ) For the Qualified Issuer and each Certified CDFI seeking a Bond Loan, an organizational capacity statement, a plan that describes how the proposed Bond Loan will meet Eligible Purposes, and a description of Credit Enhancement, if any;
( iii ) A Secondary Capital Distribution Plan, if applicable; and
( iv ) Assurances and certifications that not less than 100 percent of the principal amount of Bonds will be used to make Bond Loans for Eligible Purposes beginning on the Bond Issue Date, and that Secondary Loans shall be made as set forth in subsection 1808.307(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01




                            LXR BIOTECHNOLOGY INC.

                      COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Year Ended          Year Ended           Year Ended
                              December 31, 1996   December 31, 1995   December 31, 1994
                              -----------------   -----------------   -----------------
<S>                             <C>                <C>                 <C>           
Net loss....................... $(7,622,999)       $  (6,315,947)      $  (5,913,541)
                                ===========         =============       =============

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

  Common stock.................  15,762,729            7,513,541           6,267,407

  Common stock
    subscribed................       52,766                   --                  --
                                -----------        -------------       -------------
                                 15,815,495            7,513,541           6,267,407
                                ===========        =============       =============

Net loss per share.........     $      (.48)       $        (.84)      $        (.94)
                                ===========        =============       =============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.10(a)


 


HORACE MANN SERVICE CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN


 


SCHEDULE A PARTICIPANTS


 


Note: The effective date of entry shall be subject to Section 4.2(a).


 


	NAME OR TITLE	EFFECTIVE DATE

OF

PARTICIPATION*
	 	 
	TIER I PARTICIPANTS
	President and CEO	May 16, 2013
	 	 
	TIER II PARTICIPANTS
	EVP and CFO	**
	EVP and CMO	December 10, 2014
	EVP, Annuity, Life, Group	February 15, 2012
	 	 
	TIER III PARTICIPANTS
	SVP and CHRO	June 4, 2014


 


* Subject to acceptance within 30 days of effective date of participation

** Subject to Section 4.2(b) of the Plan


 


Last updated: March 4, 2015


 




    	-1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           42046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5517
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         3275708
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3358457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               74
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3356383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3358457
<SALES>                                        1015981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                239985
<CGS>                                           676198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   780286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 216734
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             216734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    216734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    28.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    28.90
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN LEWIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JAN SCULLY, District Attorney, 

Sacramento County; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15241 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01080-TLN-KJN 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Kevin Lewis appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations 

arising from his state court conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-15241 

2011) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Whitaker v. Garcetti, 486 F.3d 572, 

579 (9th Cir. 2007) (dismissal under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)). 

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lewis’s action as Heck-barred because 

success on Lewis’s claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction, 

and Lewis failed to show that his conviction had been invalidated. See Heck, 512 

U.S. at 486-87 (if “a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the 

invalidity of his conviction or sentence . . . the complaint must be dismissed unless 

the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been 

invalidated”).

The district court properly dismissed claims for damages against Judges 

Mendez, Gilliard, and Newman on the basis of judicial immunity because Lewis 

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that these defendants acted “in the clear 

absence of all jurisdiction or perform[ed] an act that [was] not judicial in nature.” 

Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202, 1204 (9th Cir. 1988) (explaining judicial 

immunity doctrine).

The district court properly dismissed claims for damages against defendants 

Scully and Asker on the basis of prosecutorial immunity because Lewis failed to 
3 17-15241 

allege facts sufficient to show that the actions of these defendants were not 

“intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.” Van de 

Kamp v. Goldstein, 555 U.S. 335, 341 (2009) (citation and internal quotation 

marks omitted) (explaining prosecutorial immunity doctrine).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lewis’s motion to 

recuse because Lewis failed to establish any grounds for such relief. See United 

States v. Johnson, 610 F.3d 1138, 1147 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of 

review and grounds for recusal).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
§ 238.75 Standards for review. ( a ) *Notice of disapproval.* The Board or Reserve Bank will disapprove a notice if, pursuant to the standard set forth in 12 U.S.C. 1831i(e), the Board or Reserve Bank finds that the competence, experience, character, or integrity of the proposed individual indicates that it would not be in the best interests of the depositors of the savings and loan holding company or of the public to permit the individual to be employed by, or associated with, the savings and loan holding company. If the Board or Reserve Bank disapproves a notice, it will issue a written notice that explains why the Board or Reserve Bank disapproved the notice. The Board or Reserve Bank will send the notice to the savings and loan holding company and the individual.
( b ) *Appeal of a notice of disapproval.* ( 1 ) A disapproved individual or a regulated institution that has submitted a notice that is disapproved under this section may appeal the disapproval to the Board within 15 days of the effective date of the notice of disapproval. An appeal shall be in writing and explain the reasons for the appeal and include all facts, documents, and arguments that the appealing party wishes to be considered in the appeal, and state whether the appealing party is requesting an informal hearing.
( 2 ) Written notice of the final decision of the Board shall be sent to the appealing party within 60 days of the receipt of an appeal, unless the appealing party's request for an informal hearing is granted.
( 3 ) The disapproved individual may not serve as a director or senior executive officer of the state member bank or bank holding company while the appeal is pending.
( c ) *Informal hearing.* ( 1 ) An individual or regulated institution whose notice under this section has been disapproved may request an informal hearing on the notice. A request for an informal hearing shall be in writing and shall be submitted within 15 days of a notice of disapproval. The Board may, in its sole discretion, order an informal hearing if the Board finds that oral argument is appropriate or necessary to resolve disputes regarding material issues of fact.
( 2 ) An informal hearing shall be held within 30 days of a request, if granted, unless the requesting party agrees to a later date.
( 3 ) Written notice of the final decision of the Board shall be given to the individual and the regulated institution within 60 days of the conclusion of any informal hearing ordered by the Board, unless the requesting party agrees to a later date.
§ 238.103 Filing requirement. ( a ) *Filing.* A subsidiary savings association of a savings and loan holding company must file a notice with the appropriate Reserve Bank on the designated form at least 30 days before the proposed declaration of a dividend by its board of directors.
( b ) *Schedules.* A notice may include a schedule proposing dividends over a specified period, not to exceed 12 months.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Casino Data Systems and Subsidiaries
Las Vegas, Nevada

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-66275 and No. 333-63577, of Casino Data Systems and subsidiaries (the
"Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 2000.

    Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, listed in Item 14. This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

                                          DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

March 30, 2000
### QrM/J AIR-ANM-OJII-I"-I Date: 9(0112007 

# Record of Contacts OMSDocket

No. FAA~201P-0380

__ •••••• "' •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~.5l •.•

## ss •• &_ ••••• 

## m ••.•a •••.• __ •••••••••• _ •• _ With whom outSide th..-: FAA has this proposal been di:s\:!lssed (e.g .. AT A, RAA, ,\LI',\, elC.)? OrgaoiutioD P~nDlI C"MUltd Ihle .\01''\ Rob(1"\ lI~<:kmall 12;31011 F ..\A £.LawfCo~t 12/8'Oll 

### to \,\U Waher O~~n>ljU IUlliQlI



# _____ ,_._,.,.w.u.,w,_,

_ ,._-- •• --- •••• •..• s_s_:_:W __ o· 

# _'m_,.u_. •

UNCONTROLLEO COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Chod. Itle_lei Us110 v~ 1ha:"TWills

_ C_ Revis"", Be!ore Use
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00695-CR

John Ellis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-301521, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant John Ellis seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for delivery of a

controlled substance. The trial court has certified that Ellis waived his right of appeal. A waiver of

the right to appeal that is freely and voluntarily made is binding upon the appellant. Monreal

v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 27, 2010

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23830]



[[Page 51254]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Malheur National Forest, USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of New Fee Sites.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Malheur National Forest is planning to charge a $60 fee 
for the overnight rental of Short Creek and Sunshine Cabins. These 
cabins have not been available for recreation use prior to this date. 
Rentals of other cabins on the Malheur National Forest have shown that 
people appreciate and enjoy the availability of historic rental cabins. 
Funds from the rental will be used for the continued operation and 
maintenance of Short Creek and Sunshine Cabins.

DATES: Short Creek and Sunshine Cabins will become available for 
recreation rental May, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor, Malheur National Forest, P.O. Box 909, 
John Day, OR 97845.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Harris, Recreation Fee 
Coordinator, 541-575-3008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established.
    This new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory 
Committee prior to a final decision and implementation.
    The Malheur National Forest currently has three other cabin 
rentals. These rentals are often fully booked throughout their rental 
season. An analysis of Short Creek and Sunshine Cabins has shown that 
people desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Malheur 
National Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $60/per night fee 
is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation 
experience.
    People wanting to rent Short Creek and Sunshine Cabins will need to 
do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at http://www.reserveusa.com or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National 
Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee for reservations.

    Date: September 17, 2009.
Doug Gochnour,
Malheur National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-23830 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 223.11 What is the maximum amount of covered transactions that a member bank may enter into with any single affiliate?

A member bank may not engage in a covered transaction with an affiliate (other than a financial subsidiary of the member bank) if the aggregate amount of the member bank's covered transactions with such affiliate would exceed 10 percent of the capital stock and surplus of the member bank.
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.94 What are the consequences of an insured branch or depository institution failing to maintain a satisfactory or better rating under the Community Reinvestment Act? ( a ) *Insured branch as an “insured depository institution.”* A U.S. branch of a foreign bank that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be treated as an “insured depository institution” for purposes of § 225.84.
( b ) *Applicability.* The provisions of § 225.84, with the modifications contained in this section, shall apply to a foreign bank that operates an insured branch referred to in paragraph (a) of this section or an insured depository institution in the United States, and any company that owns or controls such a foreign bank, that has made an effective election under § 225.92 in the same manner and to the same extent as they apply to a financial holding company.
# C_2023185EN.01005401.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/54

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 May 2023

(2023/C 185/13)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0735 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4502 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86793 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,5490 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9708 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,645 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 372,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5110 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,3944 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6443 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4599 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4092 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7655 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4515 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,7466 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5891 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 040,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,132 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,154 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3320 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,0797 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,8055 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0735

JPY

Japanese yen

149,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4502

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86793

SEK

Swedish krona

11,5490

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9708

ISK

Iceland króna

150,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,645

HUF

Hungarian forint

372,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5110

RON

Romanian leu

4,9495

TRY

Turkish lira

21,3944

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6443

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4599

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4092

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7655

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4515

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,30

ZAR

South African rand

20,7466

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5891

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 040,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9655

PHP

Philippine peso

60,132

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,154

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3320

MXN

Mexican peso

19,0797

INR

Indian rupee

88,8055

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Proposal under the Small Community 

Air Service Development Program

Docket #: DOT-OST-2011-0119

Legal sponsor: County of Kalamazoo

DUNS: 134404099

Congressional District Code: MI-06

Contact: Clifton E. Moshoginis, CM - Airport Director

Address: 5235 Portage Road, Kalamazoo, MI 49002-1766

Phone: (269) 388-3668 

Email: cemosh@kalcounty.com

Kalamazoo-Battle Creek

International Airport

Kalamazoo, MI