alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.4 Compensation. ( a ) *Compensation.* This term means a monthly payment made by the Department of Veterans Affairs to a veteran because of service-connected disability, or to a surviving spouse, child, or parent of a veteran because of the service-connected death of the veteran occurring before January 1, 1957, or under the circumstances outlined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. If the veteran was discharged or released from service, the discharge or release must have been under conditions other than dishonorable. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(2), (13))
( b ) *Disability compensation.* ( 1 ) Basic entitlement for a veteran exists if the veteran is disabled as the result of a personal injury or disease (including aggravation of a condition existing prior to service) while in active service if the injury or the disease was incurred or aggravated in line of duty. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1110, 1131)
( 2 ) An additional amount of compensation may be payable for a spouse, child, and/or dependent parent where a veteran is entitled to compensation based on disability evaluated as 30 per centum or more disabling. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1115)
( c ) *Death compensation.* Basic entitlement exists for a surviving spouse, child or children, and dependent parent or parents if: ( 1 ) The veteran died before January 1, 1957; or
( 2 ) The veteran died on or after May 1, 1957, and before January 1, 1972, if at the time of death a policy of United States Government Life Insurance or National Service Life Insurance was in effect under waiver of premiums under 38 U.S.C. 1924 unless the waiver was granted under the first proviso of section 622(a) of the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, and the veteran died before return to military jurisdiction or within 120 days thereafter. (See § 3.5(d) as to Public Health Service.)
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1121, 1141)
[26 FR 1564, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 38 FR 21923, Aug. 14, 1973; 39 FR 34529, Sept. 26, 1974; 44 FR 22717, Apr. 17, 1979]
#### § 19.250 Scope.

Except as provided in this subpart, subpart A of this part applies to proceedings by the Comptroller to determine whether, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 93(d) or 12 U.S.C. 1464(w), as applicable, to terminate all rights, privileges, and franchises of a national bank, Federal savings association, or Federal branch or agency convicted of a criminal offense under 18 U.S.C. 1956 or 1957 or 31 U.S.C. 5322 or 5324.
# C_2022485EN.01009301.xml

| 21.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 485/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 485/93

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 December 2022

(2022/C 485/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0599 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87530 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5098 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,181 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 403,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6757 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,7744 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5972 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4451 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2488 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6816 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4347 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 363,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,4239 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3900 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5471 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 537,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6991 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,549 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,853 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6234 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9355 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,6649 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0599

JPY

Japanese yen

140,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4388

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87530

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0615

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9854

ISK

Iceland króna

151,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5098

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,181

HUF

Hungarian forint

403,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6757

RON

Romanian leu

4,9125

TRY

Turkish lira

19,7744

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5972

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4451

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2488

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6816

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4347

KRW

South Korean won

1 363,73

ZAR

South African rand

18,4239

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3900

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5471

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 537,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6991

PHP

Philippine peso

58,549

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,853

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6234

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9355

INR

Indian rupee

87,6649

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 150.480 How do I report the results of the audit? ( a ) *Annual audit.* If you conduct an annual audit, you must note the results of the audit (including significant actions taken as a result of the audit) in the minutes of the board of directors.
( b ) *Continuous audit.* If you adopt a continuous audit system, you must note the results of all discrete audits conducted since the last audit report (including significant actions taken as a result of the audits) in the minutes of the board of directors at least once during each calendar year.
429 A.2d 658

#### Winston CARTER v. AAACON AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1979.

Filed May 8, 1981.

*548Alan H. Perer, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Neil R. Rosen, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before CERCONE, President Judge, and MONTGOMERY and LIPEZ, JJ.

CERCONE, President Judge:

Appellee, Winston Carter, filed a complaint against appellant, Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., [hereinafter Aaacon], alleging breach of appellant’s contract to transport appellee’s automobile from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to Anglewood, California. After an arbitration hearing on June 29, 1977, an award was entered for Carter. Aaacon appealed from this judgment to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, and on May 24,1978, a non-jury trial was held, which resulted in an order in favor of Carter. Thereafter, Aaacon filed exceptions, which were dismissed by the court *en banc*on December 5, 1978. It is from this December 5, 1978 order that appellant takes the present appeal. *549Because an order dismissing exceptions is not an appealable one, this appeal is quashed. To perfect such an order for appeal purposes, it must be reduced to judgment in compliance with both the rules of appellate and civil procedure. *See Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay,*283 Pa.Super. 558, 424 A.2d 950 (1981); *Slaseman*v. *Myers,*285 Pa.Super. 167, 427 A.2d 165 (1981). *See also*Pa.R.A.P. 301(c), (d) and Pa.R.C.P. 1039.

The appeal is quashed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2010041EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/2 |

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty — General Block Exemption Regulation)

2010/C 41/02

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | GBER 12/2009/REG | | |
| Member State | Romania | | |
| Granting authority | Name | Innovation Norway | |
| Address | | | | --- | | Akersgt 13 | | 0158 Oslo | | NORWAY | | |
| Web page | http://www.norwaygrants.org | |
| Title of the aid measure | Regional investment scheme under the Norwegian cooperation programmes for economic growth and sustainable development in Romania and Bulgaria respectively. | | |
| Web link to the full text of the aid measure | http://www.norwaygrants.org | | |
| Type of measure | Scheme — yes | | |
| Duration | Scheme | 26.2.2009 to 30.4.2011 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid | Yes | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | Yes | |
| Large enterprises | Yes | |
| Budget | Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 48 million in the entire duration | |
| Aid instrument (Article 5) | Grant | | Yes |
| Repayable advances | | Yes |

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| General objectives | Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| Regional investment and employment aid (Article 13) | Scheme | 50 % | 20/10 % |

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                        EXHIBIT 23.01


                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
LXR Biotechnology Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
(No. 33-92488) on Form S-8 of LXR Biotechnology Inc. of our report dated
February 26, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LXR
Biotechnology Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 
31, 1996, and for the period from April 20, 1992 (date of incorporation) through
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report
on Form 10-KSB of LXR Biotechnology Inc.


                                      /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


San Francisco, California
March 25, 1998
Exhibit 10.31


 


Amended Distribution Agreement by and between Noveda Technologies, Inc. and Canalytix LLC.


 


Please refer to the attached 7 page document in pdf format. It
includes the signatures executed as of the effective date: December 3, 2014.
#### § 161.12 Consumer credit.

The term *consumer credit* means credit extended to a natural person for personal, family, or household purposes, including loans secured by liens on real estate and chattel liens secured by mobile homes and leases of personal property to consumers that may be considered the functional equivalent of loans on personal security: *Provided,* the savings association relies substantially upon other factors, such as the general credit standing of the borrower, guaranties, or security other than the real estate or mobile home, as the primary security for the loan. Appropriate evidence to demonstrate justification for such reliance should be retained in a savings association's files. Among the types of credit included within this term are consumer loans; educational loans; unsecured loans for real property alteration, repair or improvement, or for the equipping of real property; loans in the nature of overdraft protection; and credit extended in connection with credit cards.
# C_2023116EN.01002901.xml

| 31.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/29

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 116/10)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Spain

Subject of commemoration: UNESCO: Cáceres

Description of the design: The Old Town of Cáceres is an urban ensemble located in the Autonomous Community of Extremadura in the west of the Iberian Peninsula. It was registered on the World Heritage Site list for being unique due to its historic features, which (from the Middle Ages to the classical period) bear the traces of highly diverse and contradictory influences, such as Northern Gothic, Islamic, Italian Renaissance and arts of the New World.

The design depicts a panoramic view of the monumental complex, specifically of the main square. At the top and in capital letters are the word ‘ESPAÑA’ and the year of minting ‘2023’. On the upper right hand is the mintmark. At the bottom and in capital letters is the word ‘CÁCERES’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 500 000

Date of issue: First quarter 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
# C_2023264EN.01007001.xml

| 27.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/70

---

Corrigendum to Open call for proposals – GP/DVQ/ReferNet_FPA/001/23 – ReferNet – Cedefop’s European Network of Expertise in Vocational Education and Training (VET)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 243 of 10 July 2023
  )

(2023/C 264/13)

On page 8, in point 4, ‘Deadline’:

for:

‘Applications for the framework partnership agreement and Specific Agreement for ReferNet action 2024 must be submitted at the latest by 22 September 2023.’,

read:

‘Applications for the framework partnership agreement and Specific Agreement for ReferNet action 2024 must be submitted at the latest by 6 October 2023.’;

on page 8, in point 5, ‘Further information’:

for:

‘The detailed specifications of the call for proposals, the application form and its annexes will be available as of 10.7.2023 on Cedefop’s website at the following address:

http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/about-cedefop/public-procurement’,

read:

‘The detailed specifications of the call for proposals, the application form and its annexes have been available as of 10.7.2023 on Cedefop’s website at the following address:

http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/about-cedefop/public-procurement’.

---
§ 1808.614 Covenants of Secondary Borrower with respect to Secondary Loan. In addition to making specific representations and warranties with respect to the collateral and the project being financed by the Secondary Loan proceeds, each Secondary Borrower shall covenant in the Secondary Loan agreement that it will: ( a ) Periodically, as directed by the Eligible CDFI, furnish to the Eligible CDFI certain annual and periodic financial and performance reporting;
( b ) Maintain books and records related to the Secondary Loan, the collateral and the project that is to be financed by Bond Loan proceeds, and allow inspection thereof;
( c ) Preserve its corporate existence, as applicable;
( d ) Comply with all laws to which it is subject;
( e ) Maintain insurance, as directed by the Eligible CDFI, against such risks as would customarily be maintained by commercially reasonable companies in a similar line of business;
( f ) Pay and discharge all Federal, State and local taxes;
( g ) Ensure proper use of proceeds of the Secondary Loan;
( h ) Maintain the collateral;
( i ) Periodically, as directed by the Eligible CDFI, furnish to the Eligible CDFI certain information designed to measure the impacts of the Bond Loan and the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program; and
( j ) Comply with all other representations and warranties set forth in the Secondary Loan documents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                         661,197
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  85,342
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               0
<PP&E>                         16,958,250           <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 18,340,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          0
<BONDS>                        8,562,237            <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       0                    <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   0
<SALES>                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               539,274              <F4>
<CGS>                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  183,784              <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             201,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                0
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            0
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   153,694
<EPS-BASIC>                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2675 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2675

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat Indian tribes the 
   same as State governments for purposes of chapter 35 of such Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2003

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat Indian tribes the 
   same as State governments for purposes of chapter 35 of such Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Government Tax Fairness Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DECLARATIONS AND AFFIRMATIONS.

    The Congress declares and affirms that:
            (1) The United States Constitution, U.S. Federal Court 
        decisions, and U.S. Statutes recognize that Indian tribes are 
        governments, retaining sovereign authority over their lands.
            (2) Through treaties, statutes, and executive orders, the 
        United States set aside Indian reservations to be used as 
        ``permanent homes'' for Indian Tribes.
            (3) As governments, Indian Tribes have the responsibility 
        and authority to provide governmental services, develop Tribal 
        economies, and build community infrastructure to ensure that 
        Indian reservation lands serve as livable ``permanent homes''.
            (4) Congress is vested with the authority to regulate 
        commerce with Indian Tribes, and hereby exercises that 
        authority and affirms the United States government-to-
        government relationship with Indian Tribes.
            (5) In enacting the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (Public 
        Law 100-497), Congress intended to treat Indian Tribes as State 
        governments for purposes of chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986.

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBES AS GOVERNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 7871 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Indian tribal governments treated as 
States for certain purposes) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end 
of paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) 
and inserting ``; and'', and by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(8) chapter 35 (relating to taxes on wagering).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to wagers received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013075EN.01001501.xml

| 14.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 30 November 2012

in Case E-19/11

Vín Tríó ehf. v the Icelandic State

(Free movement of goods — Admissibility — Product coverage — Articles 11 and 16 EEA — State monopolies of a commercial character — Rules concerning the existence and operation of a monopoly — Product selection rules — Refusal to sell alcoholic beverages containing stimulants such as caffeine — Discrimination between domestic and imported products — Absence of domestic production)

2013/C 75/08

In Case E-19/11 Vín Tríó ehf. v the Icelandic State — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavík District Court), on whether Articles 11 and 16 of the EEA Agreement preclude a State monopoly on the retail of alcohol from refusing to accept for sale in its retail outlets alcoholic beverages containing stimulants such as caffeine, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 30 November 2012, the operative part of which is as follows:

| | It does not contravene Article 16(1) EEA if an EEA State provides in legislation, or through administrative acts, that a body exercising a State monopoly on the retail of alcohol may refuse to accept for sale in its outlets alcoholic beverages containing stimulants such as caffeine. |
| --- | --- |

It does not contravene Article 16(1) EEA if an EEA State provides in legislation, or through administrative acts, that a body exercising a State monopoly on the retail of alcohol may refuse to accept for sale in its outlets alcoholic beverages containing stimulants such as caffeine.

| | However, such a selection rule must apply in the same manner to domestic and imported alcoholic beverages containing stimulants. If, as in the present case, there is no domestic production, and the selection rule does not aim to protect domestic production of similar products, it cannot be deemed to place operators or products from other EEA States at a disadvantage. |
| --- | --- |

However, such a selection rule must apply in the same manner to domestic and imported alcoholic beverages containing stimulants. If, as in the present case, there is no domestic production, and the selection rule does not aim to protect domestic production of similar products, it cannot be deemed to place operators or products from other EEA States at a disadvantage.

---