alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ching Lung Po

Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Atkin,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Jerry C. Atkin      |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jerry  C. Atkin          |   |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |   |
| November 5,  2010   |   |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7372

TROY ATERA BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-479-7)

Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2001

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Atera Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Troy Atera Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2000) without prejudice for failure to comply with a district court

order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because Brown may reinstate his

suit by merely providing information requested by the district

court, we lack jurisdiction to decide this appeal. See Domino

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67

(4th Cir. 1993). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

and deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2008017EN.01001201.xml

| 24.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 3 October 2007

in Case E-6/06

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Principality of Liechtenstein

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations — Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise)

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations — Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise)

(2008/C 17/08)

In Case E-6/06, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Principality of Liechtenstein:

APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to adopt, within the time-limit prescribed, or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of the adoption of, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 32g of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, i.e. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfill its obligations under Article 14 of that Act and Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judge, and Henrik Bull Judge-Rapporteur, gave judgment on 3 October 2007, the operative part of which is as follows:

THE COURT

hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time-limit prescribed, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 32g of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, i.e. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto and the sectoral adaptation contained in Annex XX to that Agreement, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time-limit prescribed, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 32g of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, i.e. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto and the sectoral adaptation contained in Annex XX to that Agreement, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | Orders the Principality of Liechtenstein to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Principality of Liechtenstein to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
#### CASTILLO V. BLACK.

(Decided December 19, 1912.)

Appeal from Escambia Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. E. Gamble.

G. W. L. Smith, for appellant. Hamilton & Brooks, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2                         CERTIFICATION

    I, Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Chief
Accounting Officer of Research Frontiers Incorporated ("RFI" or
the "Registrant") certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's  auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's  board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 19, 2004                /s/ Joseph M. Harary
                                       Joseph M. Harary, President,  Treasurer
                                       and Principal Accounting Officer
# WASTE WATER PROCESS FLOW

PHOSPHATE SUMP DEGREASE SUMP

ECOAT SUMP WASTE WATER SUMP METALS TREATMENT TANK FLOC TANK SOLIDS

SETTLE TREATED WATER HOLD TANK



### SLUDGE HOLDING 

### FILTER PRESS TREATED WATER TO CITY SEWER

DRY SLUDGE TO CEMENT KILN CAUSTIC (OH

- ) COAGULANT (1043) POLYMER 

### TO WASTE WATER BUILDING



## A UNLOAD FILTER PRESS B COLLECT AND TEST WATER SAMPLE

C COLLECT SAMPLES FOR SETTLEABILITY OBSERVATIONS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PATRICK STEVENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-98-462, CA-03-363-6)

Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Stevens seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stevens has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2022363EN.01000501.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 September 2022

(2022/C 363/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9906 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4364 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87335 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9214 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9549 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2858 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,637 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 405,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7505 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,1490 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4851 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3262 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,7761 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6844 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4006 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 381,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4879 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9821 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5205 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 866,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5097 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,285 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,786 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0924 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7847 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,1555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9906

JPY

Japanese yen

142,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4364

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87335

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9214

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9549

ISK

Iceland króna

140,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2858

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,637

HUF

Hungarian forint

405,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7505

RON

Romanian leu

4,9443

TRY

Turkish lira

18,1490

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4851

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3262

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,7761

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6844

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4006

KRW

South Korean won

1 381,38

ZAR

South African rand

17,4879

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9821

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5205

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 866,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5097

PHP

Philippine peso

57,285

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,786

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0924

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7847

INR

Indian rupee

79,1555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3194

_____________________________

HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, INC.

and SAFETY NATIONAL 

CASUALTY CORP./CORVEL,

Appellants,

v.

PATRICIA WHITEHEAD,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Ralph J. Humphries, Judge.

Date of Accident: May 3, 2015. 

May 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

A judge of compensation claims awarded workers’ 

compensation benefits based on the so-called “120-day rule,” which 

generally precludes carriers from denying compensability if they 

begin paying benefits and do not challenge compensability within 

120 days. See § 440.20(4), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also Sierra v. 

Metropolitan Protective Servs., 188 So. 3d 863, 866-67 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2015). But “[a] claimant’s ‘defense’ of waiver to an 

[employer’s] ability to deny compensability of an accident or 

specific injury/condition pursuant to the ‘120-Day Rule’ is an 
2

affirmative pleading which must be timely raised and specifically 

plead[ed].” Teco Energy, Inc. v. Williams, 234 So. 3d 816, 823 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2017). Here the claimant did not specifically plead 

application of the 120-day rule. The judge of compensation claims 

therefore erred in awarding benefits based on the rule. 

REVERSED. 

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Daniel M. Schwarz and Gina M. Jacobs of Cole, Scott & Kissane, 

P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.

Daniel J. Glary, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States courthouse located at 200 West 2ndStreet in Dayton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio,

as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building and United States

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 281 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Tony Hall Federal Building

5 and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tony

11 Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1848-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Kansas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1848-DR), dated June 24, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 30, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael R. 
Scott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Michael L. Karl as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-24149 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES





NAME OF SUBSIDIARY*                                 JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
-------------------                                 ----------------------------

OMG Fidelity, Inc.                                             Delaware
Fidelity Chemical Products Malaysia SDN.BHD                    Malaysia
Fidelity Chemical Products (BAH) Limited                       Bahamas
OMG Kokkola Chemicals Oy                                       Finland
OMG Americas, Inc.                                             Ohio
OMG Jett, Inc.                                                 Ohio
OMG Europe GmbH                                                Germany
OMG Asia-Pacific Co., Ltd.                                     Taiwan
SCM Metal Products, Inc.                                       Delaware
OMG Microbond PTE, Ltd. (70%)                                  Singapore
Vasset, S.A.                                                   France
OMG Belleville, Limited                                        Canada
OM Group Export, Limited                                       Barbados
OMG Kokkola Chemicals Holding BV                               Netherlands
OMG Thailand Co., Ltd.                                         Thailand
OMG Japan, Inc.                                                Japan
OM Holdings, Inc.                                              Delaware
Groupement Pour Le Traitement Du Terril De Lubumbashi (58%)    Jersey

* Percentage in parentheses indicates the Company's ownership, if other than
100%
EXHIBIT 10.2


                            (EASTERN BANK LETTERHEAD)



June 17, 2002

Mr. Terrence McCarthy, Vice President & Treasurer
ASA International Ltd.
10 Speen Street
Framingham, MA 01701

Dear Terry,

         This is to advise that the working capital line of credit in the amount
of $1,500,000.00 has been renewed until June 30, 2003 under the terms and
conditions of our financing agreements and any subsequent revisions. This
renewal is based on performance covenants reestablished on an annual basis. For
this fiscal year they are as follows:

                              Actual at        Required at       Testing
                              ---------        -----------       -------
                              FYE 2001         FYE 2002          Frequency
                              --------         --------          ---------
Minimum TNW                   $7,497M          $7,497M           Quarterly
Maximum Debt/TNW              0.98:1           2.00:1            Quarterly
Min. Debt Service Coverage    2.87x            1.25x             Annual
Equity must increase by       ($310M)          75%               Annual
75% of Net Income


         Please acknowledge below and return to me as soon as possible.


Very truly yours,

/s/ John R. O'Brien
-------------------
John R. O'Brien
Vice President

Acknowledged and Agreed:

ASA International Ltd.

/s/ Terrence McCarthy                                         6/19/02
---------------------                                         -------
Terrence McCarthy, Vice President & Treasurer                 Date