alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q for RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane Fund Management Corporation, the general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P., that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.

| Date:  November 14, 2008 |   | By:   /s/   Robert L.                                Lerner                                                 

President, Principal Executive Officer and                                Principal Financial Officer

Ruvane Fund Management Corporationthe general partner of RFMC Willowbridge Fund L.P. |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# CI2021432EN.01000101.xml

| 26.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 432/1

---

Call for Proposals for the establishment of a Knowledge and Innovation Community of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology

Call Identifier: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

In conformity with Regulation (EU) 2021/819 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals for a new EIT Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC). Proposals are invited for the call.

Priority area addressed by the call: Cultural and Creative Sectors and Industries

The call deadline and all relevant information on the modalities of the call, the evaluation criteria and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available in the call text and on the call page of the EIT website:

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793631
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XV LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         511,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               533,282
<PP&E>                                       6,232,499
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,179,561)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,586,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,288,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,586,220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,080
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            181,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   181,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    24.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    24.44
        


</TABLE>
§ 1235.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part, the term— *Electronic record* means a record created, generated, communicated, or stored by electronic means.
*E-mail* means a document created or received on a computer network for transmitting messages electronically, and any attachments which may be transmitted with the document.
*Employee* means any officer or employee of a regulated entity or the Office of Finance.
*Record* means any information, whether generated internally or received from outside sources by a regulated entity or the Office of Finance, related to the conduct of the business of a regulated entity or the Office of Finance (which business, in the case of the Office of Finance, shall include any functions performed with respect to the Financing Corporation) or to legal or regulatory requirements, regardless of the following— ( 1 ) Form or format, including hard copy documents (*e.g.,* files, logs, and reports), electronic documents (*e.g.,* e-mail, databases, spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations, electronic reporting systems, electronic tapes and back-up tapes, optical discs, CD-ROMS, and DVDs), and voicemail or recorded telephone line records;
( 2 ) Where the information is stored or located, including network servers, desktop or laptop computers and handheld computers, other wireless devices with text messaging capabilities, and on-site or off-site at a storage facility;
( 3 ) Whether the information is maintained or used on regulated entity or Office of Finance equipment, or on personal or home computer systems of an employee; or
( 4 ) Whether the information is active or inactive.
*Record hold* means a requirement, an order, or a directive from a regulated entity, the Office of Finance, or FHFA that the regulated entity or the Office of Finance is to retain records relating to a particular issue in connection with an actual or a potential FHFA examination, investigation, enforcement proceeding, or litigation of which the regulated entity or the Office of Finance has received notice from FHFA or otherwise has knowledge.
*Record retention schedule* means a schedule that details the categories of records a regulated entity or the Office of Finance is required to retain and the corresponding retention periods. The record retention schedule includes all media, such as microfilm and machine-readable computer records, for each record category.
*Retention period* means the length of time that records must be kept before they are destroyed, as determined by the organization's record retention schedule. Records not authorized for destruction have a retention period of “permanent.”
[76 FR 33127, June 8, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 2324, Jan. 11, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2784 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2784

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals 
      who have attained age 50 and who are unemployed to receive 
 distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 
                        percent additional tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2003

 Mr. Platts (for himself and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals 
      who have attained age 50 and who are unemployed to receive 
 distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 
                        percent additional tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO ADDITIONAL TAX ON DISTRIBUTIONS FROM QUALIFIED RETIREMENT 
              PLANS TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE ATTAINED AGE 50 AND 
              WHO ARE UNEMPLOYED.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to subsection not to apply to certain 
distributions) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(G) Distributions to certain individuals who have 
                attained age 50 and who are unemployed.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Distributions to an 
                        individual after separation from employment 
                        if--
                                    ``(I) as of the date of such 
                                distribution, such individual has 
                                attained age 50,
                                    ``(II) such individual has received 
                                unemployment compensation for 12 
                                consecutive weeks under any Federal or 
                                State unemployment compensation law by 
                                reason of such separation, and
                                    ``(III) such distribution is made 
                                during any taxable year during which 
                                such unemployment compensation is paid 
                                or any succeeding taxable year.
                            ``(ii) Reemployment and self-employment.--
                        Rules similar to the rules of clauses (ii) and 
                        (iii) of subparagraph (D) shall apply for 
                        purposes of this subparagraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to distributions made after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 19.213 Settlement.

The applicant and Enforcement Counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with § 19.15. If a prevailing party and Enforcement Counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application must be filed with the proposed settlement. If a proposed settlement of an underlying proceeding provides that each side must bear its own expenses and the settlement is accepted, no application may be filed. If, after an application is filed, Enforcement Counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement will extend, under § 19.211, the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the presiding officer upon request by Enforcement Counsel and the applicant.
§ 1265.1 Definitions. As used in this part: *Advance* means a loan from a Bank that is: ( 1 ) Provided pursuant to a written agreement;
( 2 ) Supported by a note or other written evidence of the borrower's obligations; and
( 3 ) Fully secured by collateral in accordance with the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1421 through 1449) and applicable regulations.
*SBIC* means a small business investment company formed pursuant to section 301 of the Small Business Investment Act (15 U.S.C. 681).
*Targeted income level* means: ( 1 ) For rural areas, incomes at or below 115 percent of the median income for the area, as adjusted for family size in accordance with the methodology of the applicable area median income standard or, at the option of the Bank, for a family of four; and
( 2 ) For urban areas, incomes at or below 100 percent of the median income for the area, as adjusted for family size in accordance with the methodology of the applicable area median income standard or, at the option of the Bank, for a family of four.
[75 FR 8240, Feb. 24, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 2324, Jan. 11, 2013]
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

MAY, 1900.

#### Alexander C. Clerihew, Respondent, *v.*The Standard Railroad Signal Co., Appellant.

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.

Masten *&*Nichols (Arthur H. Masten and James D. Layng, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

G. W. Hopkins, for respondent.

*Per Guriarn.*

The defendant properly excepted to a ruling by which he was prevented from showing that at the time of the making of the alleged agreement a certain statement was made by Mr. Cade, one of the persons through whom the agreement was claimed to have been made, with respect to his reason for not signing a paper presented to him for signature. The statement was relevant as tending to show one of the circumstances surrounding the making of the alleged contract and bore upon the probability of the truth of the plaintiff’s version. It might, if admitted, have had material weight with the jury, and so its exclusion was prejudicial error.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 21-0361

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MAUREEN THERESE DOUBEK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is

given an extension of time until July 18, 2022 to prepare, file and serve the 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 23 2022

06/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0361
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           225,230
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     6,344
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 241,920
<CASH>                                         3,646
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             213,481
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         11,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,651
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                370,157
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            79,065
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                22,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       846
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   638,651
<PREMIUMS>                                     41,808
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            8,840
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             71
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,492
<BENEFITS>                                     25,917
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    8,570
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           11,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,926
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,090
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.37
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 170,530
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                166,606
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
NO. 07-08-0433-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	NOVEMBER 25, 2008

	______________________________

	CARL VAN JOHNSON, APPELLANT

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 54,470-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant, Carl Van Johnson, was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to 20 years incarceration in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal in which he requested appointment of appellate counsel.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

	Appellant’s sentence was imposed on January 7, 2008.  His notice of appeal1 bears a file stamp date from the District Clerk of July 21, 2008.  Unless certain post-judgment motions are filed, a defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide for a 15-day extension in which to file a notice of appeal if it is accompanied by a motion for extension of time.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal if it is not timely perfected.  See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).  Appellant’s notice, which was filed more than seven months after sentence was imposed, is untimely and does not invoke our jurisdiction.

	Accordingly, the purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2

	Mackey K. Hancock

	Justice
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.304 Federal Register publication. The ASC publishes the following information in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public: ( a ) Description of its organization and the established places at which, the officers from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may secure information, make submittals or re nests, or obtain decisions;
( b ) Statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available;
( c ) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports or examinations;
( d ) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the ASC;
( e ) Every amendment, revision or repeal of the foregoing; and
( f ) General notices of proposed rulemaking.
[64 FR 72497, Dec. 28, 1999]
#### Samuel Engel, Respondent, *v.*James H. Sillcocks, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment, after trial, before a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*748George W. Gibbons (D. T. Kimball, of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel S. Koenig (Michael Schaap, of counsel), for respondent.

Conlan, J.

The action was brought to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant’s workmen in removing a quantity of water from the roof of 124 Prince street, in this city. In attempting to clear out the conductor pipe leading from the roof to the sewer in the cellar, the workmen removed a trap or cover, and made a hole in the pipe itself, and the water came down with such force and in such volume as to flood the cellar and damage a quantity of tobacco stored there.

There is no serious dispute upon the facts of the case. The judge charged the jury upon the whole question, and no exception was taken by the defendant to any portion thereof. It was peculiarly the province of the jury to determine the questions' of fact submitted, and we are not inclined to disturb the conclusion arrived at.

No serious questions are presented for our consideration, and the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Space platform expendablesresupply concept definition study**
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:178820 | NAS 1.26:178821| NAS 1.26:178822

Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000876683
 
Volumes: 010203
 
April 8, 2020