alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60613

Summary Calendar

ROTIMI DEJI ADETUNJI, also known as Paul Derek Collins,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A078 543 636

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Rotimi Deji Adetunji appeals the denial of his requests for waivers of

removability made pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(h) and 1227(a)(1)(H). The

immigration judge (IJ) determined that Adetunji did not provide credible

testimony and declined to exercise his discretion to grant the requested relief

after concluding that the negative factors outweighed the positive factors. The

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) concurred in the findings of the IJ.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60613 Document: 00511497356 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2011
No. 10-60613

This court reviews the decision of the BIA, as well as the decision of the IJ

to the extent that his decision influenced the BIA. Zhu v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d

588, 593-94 (5th Cir. 2007). To the extent that Adetunji challenges the IJ’s

credibility determination or his decision not to exercise his discretion in

awarding relief, we are without jurisdiction to hear his petition. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Delgado-Reynua v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 596, 599-600 (5th

Cir. 2006); Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 306 (5th Cir. 2005).

Adetunji also argues that the denial of discretionary relief violated his due

process and equal protection rights. We retain jurisdiction to review legal

questions or constitutional claims. § 1252(a)(2)(D). Adetunji’s assertions that

the IJ’s weighing of the factors resulted in an unfair hearing and constituted a

denial of equal protection are in fact challenges to the agency’s discretionary

determination, which we may not review. See Hadwani v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d

798, 800-01 (5th Cir. 2006). In addition, Adetunji asserts that the IJ was biased

against him, which may rise to the level of a due process violation. Wang v.

Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 540 (5th Cir. 2009). However, his conclusional assertion

and his reliance solely upon the adverse ruling of the IJ is insufficient to

establish bias. Id. at 540-41. Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED in part

for lack of jurisdiction and DENIED in part.

2

Case: 10-60613 Document: 00511497356 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2011
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 1:34 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: OMB/DOE Discussion on HRI and Natural Gas Re-Dispatch 

Hi Bob, 

Attached is spreadsheet for clearance information. Please fill out all the information for attendees 

(including gender) and return to me by COB Wednesday, 5/9. If you do not provide clearance 

information, you won’t be allowed to enter the building. 

Attendees will need to bring government-issued identification to enter the building. 

The address is: 

New Executive Office Building (NEOB) 10103 (10th floor), 725 17th Street NW, DC 

 

Metro directions: From Farragut West (blue/orange line), head south on 17th St NW. You’ll cross 

H St NW, and the NEOB will be on the left, a big red building. If you get to Pennsylvania Ave, 

you’ve gone too far. Give me a call on my Blackberry (202 503 6595) if you have trouble getting 

into the building. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< Waves Format_20_Excel_Template_V1 8 9 (3).xls >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 1:19 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Higgins, Cortney; Tsirigotis, Peter; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; 

Stenhouse, Jeb; Hutson, Nick; Srivastava, Ravi; Fellner, Christian; Forte, Reynaldo; 

Kokopeli, Peter; Adamantiades, Mikhail; Eschmann, Erich 

Cc: Johnson, Mary; Johnson, Tanya; King, Melanie 

Subject: OMB/DOE Discussion on HRI and Natural Gas Re-Dispatch 

When: Friday, May 09, 2014 9:30 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: TBD (Call-in: 1-866-299-3188, passcode: 919-541-5536) 

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss EPA’s Heat Rate Improvement approach for BB1 and 

Natural Gas Re-Dispatch approach for BB2. This meeting will likely be a face-to-face meeting over 

at OMB, but I’ve added a call-in number just in case. Cortney will advise us at a later date on the 

location/logistics. 

EPA – Please invite other critical/key staff on BB’s 1 and 2 as necessary.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51612-51613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m., October 21, 2009; 8 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., October 22, 2009.
    Place: CDC, Tom Harkin Global Communications Center, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Building 19, Kent ``Oz'' Nelson Auditorium, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The committee is charged with advising the Director, 
CDC, on the appropriate uses of immunizing agents. In addition, 
under 42 U.S.C. 1396s, the committee is mandated to establish and 
periodically review and, as appropriate, revise the list of vaccines 
for administration to vaccine-eligible children through the Vaccines 
for Children (VFC) program, along with schedules regarding the 
appropriate periodicity, dosage, and contraindications applicable to 
the vaccines.
    Matters to be Discussed: The agenda will include discussions on: 
Human

[[Page 51613]]

Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines; 2010 Childhood & Adolescent 
Immunization Schedule; 2010 Adult Immunization Schedule; General 
Recommendations; Respiratory Syncytial Virus; Meningococcal 
Vaccines; Yellow Fever Vaccine; Rotavirus Vaccines; 13-Valent 
Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; and Influenza Vaccines. Agenda items 
are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Antonette Hill, 
Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and 
Respiratory Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., (E-05), Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8836, fax 404/639-8905.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both the CDC and ATSDR.

    Dated: September 30, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-24157 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-P
# C_2023015EN.01000101.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 15/01)

Last publication

OJ C 7, 9.1.2023

Past publications

OJ C 482, 19.12.2022

OJ C 472, 12.12.2022

OJ C 463, 5.12.2022

OJ C 451, 28.11.2022

OJ C 441, 21.11.2022

OJ C 432, 14.11.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2023207EN.01000101.xml

| 14.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 June 2023

(2023/C 207/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0793 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 150,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,6400 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9784 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,6235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,813 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 371,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4750 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9627 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 25,5471 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5922 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4403 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4550 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7564 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4467 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 373,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1087 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7167 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 044,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9831 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,252 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,279 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2469 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6655 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,8630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0793

JPY

Japanese yen

150,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85850

SEK

Swedish krona

11,6400

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9784

ISK

Iceland króna

149,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,6235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,813

HUF

Hungarian forint

371,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4750

RON

Romanian leu

4,9627

TRY

Turkish lira

25,5471

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5922

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4403

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4550

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7564

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4467

KRW

South Korean won

1 373,73

ZAR

South African rand

20,1087

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7167

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 044,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9831

PHP

Philippine peso

60,252

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,279

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2469

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6655

INR

Indian rupee

88,8630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 204.128 Deposits at foreign branches guaranteed by domestic office of a depository institution. ( a ) In accepting deposits at branches abroad, some depository institutions may enter into agreements from time to time with depositors that in effect guarantee payment of such deposits in the United States if the foreign branch is precluded from making payment. The question has arisen whether such deposits are subject to Regulation D, and this interpretation is intended as clarification.
( b ) Section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act which establishes reserve requirements does not apply to deposits of a depository institution “payable only at an office thereof located outside of the States of the United States and the District of Columbia” (12 U.S.C. 371a; 12 CFR 204.1(c)(5)). The Board rule in 1918 that the requirements of section 19 as to reserves to be carried by member banks do not apply to foreign branches (1918 *Fed. Res. Bull.* 1123). The Board has also defined the phrase *Any deposit that is payable only at an office located outside the United States,* in § 204.2(t) of Regulation D, 12 CFR 204.2(t).
( c ) The Board believes that this exemption from reserve requirements should be limited to deposits in foreign branches as to which the depositor is entitled, under his agreement with the depository institution, to demand payment only outside the United States, regardless of special circumstances. The exemption is intended principally to enable foreign branches of U.S. depository institutions to compete on a more nearly equal basis with banks in foreign countries in accordance with the laws and regulations of those countries. A customer who makes a deposit that is payable solely at a foreign branch of the depository institution assumes whatever risk may exist that the foreign country in which a branch is located might impose restrictions on withdrawals. When payment of a deposit in a foreign branch is guaranteed by a promise of payment at an office in the United States if not paid at the foreign office, the depositor no longer assumes this risk but enjoys substantially the same rights as if the deposit had been made in a U.S. office of the depository institution. To assure the effectiveness of Regulation D and to prevent evasions thereof, the Board considers that such guaranteed foreign-branch deposits must be subject to that regulation.
( d ) Accordingly, a deposit in a foreign branch of a depository institution that is guaranteed by a domestic office is subject to the reserve requirements of Regulation D the same as if the deposit had been made in the domestic office. This interpretation is not designed in any respect to prevent the head office of a U.S. bank from repaying borrowings from, making advances to, or supplying capital funds to its foreign branches, subject to Eurocurrency liability reserve requirements.
[52 FR 47696, Dec. 16, 1987]
RegistrationStatement
    
    Description
    
    Filing Date333-07531
    
    OM Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors
Equity Compensation PlanForm S-8
Registration Statement250,000 Shares
    
    July 3, 1996333-47230
    
    OM Group, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation PlanForm S-8 Registration
Statement2,000,000 Shares
    
    October 3, 2000333-65852
    
    OM Group, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation PlanForm S-8 Registration
Statement2,000,000 Shares
    
    July 25, 2001333-141033
    
    OM Group, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan
and Inducement Stock Option Grant to
Joseph M. ScaminaceForm S-8
Registration Statement1,488,934 Shares
    
    March 2, 2007333-145238
    
    OM Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation
PlanForm S-8 Registration Statement
3,000,000 Shares
    
    August 8, 2007
Source: BLM 2007 

Fis h C

Nuiqsut

r e e k 

K i

r

k i a k r

k 

R i v e

o

r

r a

A R C T I C O C E A N 

Jud

p 

y 

Miguakiak R. 

H a r r i

12 11 10

12 11 10

13 12 11 10

3 2 1 W 7 6 5 4

1 W 1 E 

8 

2 2 

9 

3 

3 4

5 4

5 

1 N 

1 E 

6 

2 2 

7 

3 3 

8 

4 

4 

9 

5 

9 8 7 6 5

12 

11 

14 

10 

15 N 

13 

8 

4 

1 S 

5 

7 

3 

2 

0 6 12

Miles 6 

6 

2 

VISUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 3 

9 N 

5 

1 W 

4 

C o l v i l l e 

I k i k p u k 

R i v

e

r 

R i v e

R i v e r 

K o g u s u k r u k 

Cr e ek 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

s o n 

B a y 

Pitt Point 

Cape Simpson 

Sm i t h B a y 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

T e s h e k p u k L a k e 

Inventory Classes

(acres approximate) 

Class II 298,000 acres 

Class III 1,477,000 acres 

Classs IV 2,882,000 acres 

Map 3-48. Visual Resource Management Inventory Classes in the Northeast National Petroleum Reserve ­

Alaska
§ 1500.6 What risk management, record keeping and reporting policies are required to make merchant banking investments? ( a ) *What internal controls and records are necessary?* — ( 1 ) *General.* A financial holding company, including a private equity fund controlled by a financial holding company, that makes investments under this part must establish and maintain policies, procedures, records and systems reasonably designed to conduct, monitor and manage such investment activities and the risks associated with such investment activities in a safe and sound manner, including policies, procedures, records and systems reasonably designed to: ( i ) Monitor and assess the carrying value, market value and performance of each investment and the aggregate portfolio;
( ii ) Identify and manage the market, credit, concentration and other risks associated with such investments;
( iii ) Identify, monitor and assess the terms, amounts and risks arising from transactions and relationships (including contingent fees or contingent interests) with each company in which the financial holding company holds an interest under this part;
( iv ) Ensure the maintenance of corporate separateness between the financial holding company and each company in which the financial holding company holds an interest under this part and protect the financial holding company and its depository institution subsidiaries from legal liability for the operations conducted and financial obligations of each such company; and
( v ) Ensure compliance with this part.
( 2 ) *Availability of records.* A financial holding company must make the policies, procedures and records required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section available to the Board or the appropriate Reserve Bank upon request.
( b ) Certain additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements for merchant banking investments are set forth in the Board's Regulation Y, 12 CFR 225.175.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2821 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2821

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
   access to audiologists for Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2003

    Mr. Ryun of Kansas (for himself and Mrs. Capps) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
   access to audiologists for Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hearing Health Accessibility Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. DIRECT ACCESS TO QUALIFIED AUDIOLOGISTS FOR MEDICARE 
              BENEFICIARIES.

    Section 1861(ll)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x(ll)(2)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, without regard to any requirement that the individual 
receiving the audiology services be under the care of (or referred by) 
a physician or other health care practitioner or that such services are 
provided under the supervision of a physician or other health care 
practitioner''.

SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF AUDIOLOGY SERVICES AS A PART B MEDICAL SERVICE; 
              PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (U), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (V), by inserting ``and'' at the end; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(W) audiology services (as defined in subsection 
        (ll)(2));''.
    (b) Payment Under the Physician Fee Schedule.--Section 1848(j)(3) 
of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting 
``(2)(W),'' after ``(2)(S),''.

SEC. 4. CONSTRUCTION; EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to expand 
the scope of audiology services for which payment may be made under 
title XVIII of the Social Security Act on December 31, 2003.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take 
effect with respect to services furnished on or after January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed October 13 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00 638

- CV

____________ LIDIA AKLILU HABTETSION , Appellant

V.

S EAN PATRICK NEARY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 507th Dist rict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 2021

- 73154



### ORDER
The notice of appeal in this case was filed Se ptember 1 , 2022. To date, the appellate filing fee of $ 20 5.00 has not been paid by appellant

. Moreover, t he clerk responsible for prepar ing the record notified this court tha t appellant ha s not made payment for the record. No evidence that appellant ha s established i ndigence has
been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 5, 145. On September 19 , 2022, this court notified appellant that the court may d ismiss the appeal unless she paid the appellate filing fee, and o n September 22 , 2022, this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response with proof of payment for the2

record. No response was filed to eith er notice . Therefore, the court is sue s the following order.
Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the
date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See
Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Appella nt is further ordered to pay the app ellate filing fee in the amount of $205 .00 to the Clerk of this court within ten (10) days of the date
of this order

. If appellant fail s t o timely comply with either of those orders , the appeal will be subject to dism issal without further notice for want of prosecution.
See Tex

. R. App. P. 37.3(b) , 42.3(b)

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.
EXHIBIT 4.1

Certificate No.
For ___________ Shares
Issued to

---------------------

---------------------

---------------------

Dated ______________ 19____

From Whom Transferred

---------------------

Dated _______________ 19____

No. Original               No Original               No of Shares
Certificate                Shares                    Transferred

Received Certificate No. ________

For ____________ Shares

this ________ day of _________, 19____

---------------------------------

---------------------------------


<PAGE>

COMMON   STOCK

THE PBSJ CORPORATION
A Florida Corporation

Authorized Common Stock,
3,000,000 Shares, $.0033 Par Value

This Certifies that _________________ is the owner of ____________________
shares of the Capital Stock of The PBSJ Corporation being fully paid
non-assessable Common Stock, subject to the terms and conditions on the reverse
side hereof, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate Seal so to be hereunto
affixed this ________ day of A.D. 19_____.

<PAGE>


Certificate for _____________ Shares of Capital Stock Issued to ________________
dated ______________________.



For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto
_________________________ ____________________________________ Shares of the
Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint _______________________, Attorney to transfer the said
Stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated _____________________, 19_____


In the presence of

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.