alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DUNLAP v. SHULER.

No. 31141.

Sept. 28, 1943.

*141*P. *2d 585.*

Everest, McKenzie & Gibbens, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Tom S. Williams, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced by O. M. Shuler, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, to recover on a contract for the purchase of two water pumps. The action was maintained against Homer Dunlap, doing business under the firm name and style of the Dunlap Company. Homer Dunlap personally filed the petition in error as plaintiff in error, and the testimony in the record is that he is the trustee of a common-law trust. Reference to him as defendant will be in his individual ca*126pacity. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the sum of $525. The defendant appeals and presents two allegations of error.

It is first argued that there is no competent evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the trial court entered thereon. The second allegation of error is that the trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial. These two allegations of error are covered in four general specifications presented by the defendant. In these two specifications of error the entire argument is based upon the alleged error of the trial court in admitting certain evidence of conversations had between the plaintiff and R. L. Knight, an uncle of the defendant.

The facts established are, substantially, that Homer Dunlap contacted the plaintiff and sought to purchase two water pumps. The plaintiff and Homer Dunlap never agreed upon the price of these water pumps. Subsequent to the dealing between Homer Dunlap and the plaintiff, R. L. Knight entered into a contract for the purchase of the two pumps in question for the sum of $525.

In our opinion the testimony of Homer Dunlap is sufficient to establish that R. L. Knight was acting for him as agent. The defendant testified that subsequent to his contacting the plaintiff, Knight had a conversation with the plaintiff and agreed to purchase the pumps for $525; that plaintiff accepted Knight’s proposition. According to the record this was the only proposition upon which the pumps were delivered to the defendant. Questions of agency and the scope of agent’s authority may be proved by circumstantial evidence and are questions of fact for the jury. Phillips Pet. Co. v. Ward, 181 Okla. 462, 74 P. 2d 614; Beasley v. Parks, 163 Okla. 15, 20 P. 2d 584; Loveland v. Loafman, 92 Okla. 133, 218 P. 851; Champlin Refining Co. v. Crisp, 184 Okla. 248, 86 P. 2d 784.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CORN, C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V. C. J., absent.
H. R. 2744

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 17th

Street in Moline, Illinois, as the ‘‘David Bybee Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

514 17th Street in Moline, Illinois, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘David Bybee Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘David

Bybee Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2023264EN.01004301.xml

| 27.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/43

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2023/C 264/09)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AD/403/23 — Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields:

| 1. | Crisis management |
| --- | --- |

1.

Crisis management

| 2. | Migration and internal security |
| --- | --- |

2.

Migration and internal security

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union
  C 264 A of 27 July 2023
  .

Further information can be found on the EPSO website (1).

---

(1)  https://epso.europa.eu/en

---
# C_2008113EN.01001701.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/17

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 21 February 2008

in Case E-5/07

Private Barnehagers Landsforbund v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Municipal kindergartens — State aid — Notion of undertaking — Decision not to raise objections — Initiation of the formal investigation procedure — Admissibility)

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — Municipal kindergartens — State aid — Notion of undertaking — Decision not to raise objections — Initiation of the formal investigation procedure — Admissibility)

(2008/C 113/14)

In Case E-5/07, Private Barnehagers Landsforbund v EFTA Surveillance Authority — application for the annulment of Decision No 39/07/COL of 27 February 2007 on public financing of municipal day-care institutions in Norway, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judge, and Bjørg Ven, ad hoc Judge, gave judgment on 21 February 2008, the operative part of which is as follows:

ad hoc

‘THE COURT

hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the Applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Defendant.’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Defendant.’.

---
HomeThird-Party Contractor...Robert Jason Gore

# 									Robert Jason Gore							

DS Memorial

April 21, 2005

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Third-Party Contractor****Year of Death: 2005**

Robert Jason Gore, Private Security Contractor, died on April 21, 2005, in Iraq, north of Baghdad. He was killed in a helicopter crash (missile attack). His hometown is Nevada, Iowa.

**Photo: Private collection image**

Tags

DS Third Party ContractorIraq

Back to Top
# C_2023297EN.01000101.xml

| 22.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 August 2023

(2023/C 297/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0908 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 159,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,9095 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9588 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5205 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,020 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 381,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4785 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9406 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 29,6305 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6995 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4723 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5488 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8407 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4791 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 460,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,6760 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9456 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 718,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0706 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,543 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,314 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4140 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5927 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 90,6615 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0908

JPY

Japanese yen

159,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85475

SEK

Swedish krona

11,9095

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9588

ISK

Iceland króna

143,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5205

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,020

HUF

Hungarian forint

381,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4785

RON

Romanian leu

4,9406

TRY

Turkish lira

29,6305

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6995

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4723

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5488

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8407

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4791

KRW

South Korean won

1 460,32

ZAR

South African rand

20,6760

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9456

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 718,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0706

PHP

Philippine peso

61,543

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

38,314

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4140

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5927

INR

Indian rupee

90,6615

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

NOVEMBER, 1900.

#### Arthur W. McLaughlin et al., Appellants, *v.*Frances Louise Ranger et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants.

A. Thain, for appellants.

C. C. Leeds (Arthur C. Palmer, of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiffs insist that prejudicial error was committed upon the trial, in that certain irrelevant evidence was received which may have affected the verdict. It is unnecessary to pass upon this question, because the cause should not have been submitted to the jury at all. In order to maintain their action it was -necessary for the plaintiffs to show that J. Henry Ranger was authorized to act as the agent of the defendants for the purpose of negotiating the loan in respect to which the plaintiffs claim a commission. No competent evidence of such an agency was presented. Consequently the complaint should have been dismissed by the court.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# C_2021352EN.01000501.xml

| 2.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 September 2021

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 September 2021

(2021/C 352/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1817 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85863 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1961 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0845 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2633 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,406 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 348,03 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5078 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9346 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,7985 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4879 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1907 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6776 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5916 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 369,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0532 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6421 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4900 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 872,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9085 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,163 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,3373 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,204 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0886 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,6484 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,3480 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1817

JPY

Japanese yen

130,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85863

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1961

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0845

ISK

Iceland króna

149,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2633

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,406

HUF

Hungarian forint

348,03

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5078

RON

Romanian leu

4,9346

TRY

Turkish lira

9,7985

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4879

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1907

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6776

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5916

KRW

South Korean won

1 369,25

ZAR

South African rand

17,0532

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6421

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4900

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 872,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9085

PHP

Philippine peso

59,163

RUB

Russian rouble

86,3373

THB

Thai baht

38,204

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0886

MXN

Mexican peso

23,6484

INR

Indian rupee

86,3480

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1292.7 Documentation. ( a ) A Bank shall require the borrower to certify to the Bank that each project funded under a CICA program (other than AHP) meets the respective targeting requirements of the CICA program. Such certification shall include a description of how the project meets the requirements, and where appropriate, a statistical summary or list of incomes of the borrowers, rents for the project, or salaries of jobs created or retained.
( b ) For those CICA-funded projects that also receive funds from another targeted Federal economic development program that has income targeting requirements that are the same as, or more restrictive than, the targeting requirements of the applicable CICA program, the Bank shall permit the borrower to certify that compliance with the criteria of such Federal economic development program will meet the requirements of the respective CICA program.
( c ) Such certifications shall satisfy the Bank's obligations to document compliance with the CICA funding provisions of this part.
# C_2011025EN.01000201.xml

| 27.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/2

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2011/C 25/02

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 3/10/R&D |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) |
| Address | Drammensveien 211 |
| Postboks 5091 Majorstua |
| 0301 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 3/10/R&D

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)

Address

Drammensveien 211

Postboks 5091 Majorstua

0301 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.nve.no/

Title of the aid measure

Aid for Avalanche Research ‘Tilskudd til snøskredforskning’

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Prop. 1 S (2009-10) Chapter 18.30, item 22

Letter of allocation 2.7.2010

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.nve.no/no/Flom-og-skred/Skred/FoU—skred/Tilskudd-til-snoskredforskning

Ad hoc aid

Norges geotekniske institutt

Date of granting

Ad hoc aid

2 July 2010

Economic sector(s) concerned

Limited to specific sectors — Please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2

74.909

Type of beneficiary

SME

Yes

Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking

NOK 10,5 million (not yet allocated for 2011 and 2012)

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

Yes

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME-bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for research, development and innovation
  (Articles 30-37) | Aid for research and development projects
  (Article 31) | Fundamental research
  (Article 31(2)(a)) | ... % | |
| Industrial research
  (Article 31(2)(b)) | 65 % (50 % + 15 %) | |
| Experimental development
  (Article 31(2)(c)) | ... % | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME-bonuses in %

Aid for research, development and innovation

(Articles 30-37)

Aid for research and development projects

(Article 31)

Fundamental research

(Article 31(2)(a))

... %

Industrial research

(Article 31(2)(b))

65 % (50 % + 15 %)

Experimental development

(Article 31(2)(c))

... %

---
# C_2010332EN.01000701.xml

| 9.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/7

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2010/C 332/05

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 5/10/ENV |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | All regions | Regional aid status |
| Granting authority | Name | Innovation Norway |
| Address | PO Box 448 Sentrum |
| 0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 5/10/ENV

EFTA State

Norway

Region

All regions

Regional aid status

Granting authority

Name

Innovation Norway

Address

PO Box 448 Sentrum

0104 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.innovationnorway.com

Title of the aid measure

Investment aid scheme for the promotion of energy from renewable energy resources (Investeringsstøtte til pilot- og demonstrasjonsanlegg innenfor fornybar energi)

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Prop. 1 S (2009-2010), page 141, see

http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/2250745/PDFS/PRP200920100001NHDDDDPDFS.pdf

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.innovationnorway.com

The exact webpage is under construction, and will be published in July. ESA will be informed as soon as it is published, which will be before the scheme is put into effect.

Type of measure

Scheme

Yes (grants to beneficiaries)

Duration

Scheme

1.8.2010 to 31.12.2013

Subject to the parliamentary budgetary procedure

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

All sectors

Type of beneficiary

SME

Yes

Large enterprises

Yes

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

NOK 50 million

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

Yes

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME-bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for Environmental protection
  (Articles 17-25) | Environmental investment aid for the promotion of energy from renewable energy sources
  (Article 23) | 45 % for large enterprises | 65 % (total) for small enterprises, 55 % for medium sized enterprises |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME-bonuses in %

Aid for Environmental protection

(Articles 17-25)

Environmental investment aid for the promotion of energy from renewable energy sources

(Article 23)

45 % for large enterprises

65 % (total) for small enterprises, 55 % for medium sized enterprises

---
§ 1500.8 Definitions. ( a ) *What do references to a financial holding company include?* — ( 1 ) Except as otherwise expressly provided, the term “financial holding company” as used in this part means the financial holding company and all of its subsidiaries, including a private equity fund or other fund controlled by the financial holding company.
( 2 ) Except as otherwise expressly provided, the term “financial holding company” does not include a depository institution or subsidiary of a depository institution or any portfolio company controlled directly or indirectly by the financial holding company.
( b ) *What do references to a depository institution include?* For purposes of this part, the term “depository institution” includes a U.S. branch or agency of a foreign bank.
( c ) *What is a portfolio company?* A portfolio company is any company or entity: ( 1 ) That is engaged in any activity not authorized for the financial holding company under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843); and
( 2 ) Any shares, assets or ownership interests of which are held, owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the financial holding company pursuant to this part, including through a private equity fund that the financial holding company controls.
( d ) *Who are the executive officers of a company?* — ( 1 ) An executive officer of a company is any person who participates or has the authority to participate (other than in the capacity as a director) in major policymaking functions of the company, whether or not the officer has an official title, the title designates the officer as an assistant, or the officer serves without salary or other compensation.
( 2 ) The term “executive officer” does not include— ( i ) Any person, including a person with an official title, who may exercise a certain measure of discretion in the performance of his duties, including the discretion to make decisions in the ordinary course of the company's business, but who does not participate in the determination of major policies of the company and whose decisions are limited by policy standards fixed by senior management of the company; or
( ii ) Any person who is excluded from participating (other than in the capacity of a director) in major policymaking functions of the company by resolution of the board of directors or by the bylaws of the company and who does not in fact participate in such policymaking functions.
( e ) *What is the Board?* The Board means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
( f ) *How are other terms that are used in this part defined?* Unless otherwise defined in this part, all terms used have the meanings given such terms in the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24100]



[[Page 51659]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, November 18, 2009, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. 
For more information please contact Mrs. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-24100 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P