alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Robinson, Christopher T. – Republic of Latvia – July 2022

# 									Robinson, Christopher T. – Republic of Latvia – July 2022							

Certificate of Competency

July 7, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:             Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Republic of Latvia

CANDIDATE:     Christopher T. Robinson

Christopher Robinson, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.  Prior to that, Robinson was Minister Counselor for Political Affairs at U.S. Embassy Moscow, Russia.  Previously, he served as Deputy Director for Russian Affairs at the State Department, as Political Counselor at the U.S. Mission to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna, Austria, and as Political Counselor in Managua, Nicaragua.  Other assignments include Iraq, Belarus, Canada, Russia, and assignments in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs and the Bureau of European Affairs.

Robinson’s twenty-seven years of diplomatic experience, combined with his regional expertise, language knowledge, extensive background as a manager, and his demonstrated ability to lead policy-oriented offices, make him a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Latvia.

Robinson received an M.S. in strategic studies from the National War College and a B.A. in international affairs from the George Washington University.  He is the recipient of multiple State Department performance awards, including two Senior Foreign Service Performance Awards and a Distinguished Honor Award.  Robinson speaks Russian and Spanish.

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      8,101,400
<SECURITIES>                                4,474,300         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  61,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12,637,500 
<PP&E>                                     18,043,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,855,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             26,850,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,379,600
<BONDS>                                     1,569,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 17,836,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               26,850,500
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              703,600
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 175,600 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               45,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               342,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           342,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  342,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .55
        


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). D A T / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SHAU N ROE, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 30038 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 0 0 2 - T MB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka T i m othyM . B ur ge s s , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , a n dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S h au n R o e ap p e a ls f

r o m th e 1 6 8 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir in g to d is tr ib u te a n dto p o s s e s s w ith in te n t to di s tr i but e he r oi n, i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 846 a nd 841( b) ( 1) ( A ) . W e ha ve



# FI LED MA R 31 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD AT / Res ea r ch 09- 30038 2 j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. T h e G o v ern m en tco n t en d s th atw e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n o v er th i s ap p eal b ecau se R oe w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l hi s c onvi c t i on a nd s e nt e nc e . T hi s c ont e nt i on l a c ks m e r it. Se e U

n ite d S ta tes v . J

a c o b o Ca s tillo , 49 6 F . 3d 94 7, 95 7 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( en banc) (e nforceabl e app ea l w ai ver does notdepri ve thi s c ou rtof j uri sdi ct i on ). R oe cont ends thatal tho ug h h e w ai ved h i s r i gh tt o app ea l i n a w ri tt en pl ea ag reem en t , th e w ai v er i s n o ten fo rceab l e b ecau se th e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tad v i se h im a t h is c h a n g e o f

p le ah e a r in g th a t h is s ta te m e n ts , u n d e ro a th , c o u ldb e u s e din s ubs e que ntpe r

j urypr oc e e di ngs . T hi s c ont e nt i on l a c ks m e r i tbe c aus e the g o v e rn m e n t d idn o t in itia te ap e r ju rya c tio n a g a in s t R o e . See Fe d . R. Cr i m. P. 1 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( B ) ; s e e al

s o U ni te d States v . V

onn , 29 4 F . 3d 10 93 , 10 94 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) ( o r d e r ) . T hu s, R oe’ s c on t ent i on thatthe di stri ctcourterre d i n i m po si ng a f ou r- l evel l ea ders hi p enh ance m entpu rs uantt o U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 1(a) i s pre cl ud ed by the appeal w a iv e r . See U

ni ted States v. B i bl er , 4 9 5 F .3 d6 2 1 , 6 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . AF F I RME D.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Turkmenistan

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Turkmenistan			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan

During the review period, budget documents and information on debt obligations were not made public, including for state-owned enterprises.  The government published aggregate revenue data online in its state-run newspaper.  Publicly available budget information was not complete and did not include government revenues from natural resources.  Information on the government’s off-budget stabilization fund was not publicly available.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its reports publicly available despite purportedly reviewing the government’s financial statements.  The government did not fully specify in law or regulation the procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.  It was unclear if the laws and regulations that do exist were followed in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not always publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund did not have a sound legal framework or disclose its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Turkmenistan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Making budget documents publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Making information on debt obligations, including for state-owned enterprises, publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Ensuring budget documents are substantially complete and reliable;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- Making supreme audit institution reports publicly available;
- Fully outlining the criteria and procedures for allocating natural resource extraction licenses and contracts in law or regulation;
- Following applicable natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice;
- Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available; and
- Establishing a sound legal framework for the sovereign wealth fund and disclosing its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentTurkmenistan

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2008175EN.01001001.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/10

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections against the notified measure

(2008/C 175/12)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28 November 2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number | 62777 |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Mo i Rana |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Investment support in favour of Celsa Ameringsstål to reduce mercury emissions |
| Legal basis | Decision by the Ministry of Trade and Industry |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Grant |
| Budget | NOK 20,6 million (EUR 2,5 million) |
| Intensity | 35 % |
| Economic sectors | Steel reinforcing products, Innovation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | PB 448 Sentrum |
| N-0104 Oslo |

Date of adoption of the decision

28 November 2007

Case number

62777

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Mo i Rana

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Investment support in favour of Celsa Ameringsstål to reduce mercury emissions

Legal basis

Decision by the Ministry of Trade and Industry

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Grant

Budget

NOK 20,6 million (EUR 2,5 million)

Intensity

35 %

Economic sectors

Steel reinforcing products, Innovation

Name and address of the granting authority

PB 448 Sentrum

N-0104 Oslo

Other information

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
§ 1209.4 Scope and authority. The rules of practice and procedure set forth in Subpart C (Rules of Practice and Procedure) of this part shall be applicable to any hearing on the record conducted by FHFA in accordance with sections 1371 through 1379D of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4631 through 4641), as follows: ( a ) Cease-and-desist proceedings under sections 1371 and 1373 of the Safety and Soundness Act, (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4633);
( b ) Civil money penalty assessment proceedings under sections 1373 and 1376 of the Safety and Soundness Act, (12 U.S.C. 4633, 4636); and
( c ) Removal and prohibition proceedings under sections 1373 and 1377 of the Safety and Soundness Act, (12 U.S.C. 4633, 4636a), except removal proceedings under section 1377(h) of the Safety and Soundness Act, (12 U.S.C. 4636a(h)).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     financial data schedule
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000793730  
<NAME>                        NHP 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         4,049,802
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         63,803,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13,372,733)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,279,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        42,672,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,546,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,279,909
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,776,511
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,775,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               376,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,325,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,700,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,700,565)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
§ 19.122 Civil money penalty authority under Federal securities laws. ( a ) *Scope.* Except as provided in this section, subpart A of this part applies to proceedings by the Comptroller to determine whether, pursuant to authority contained in section 21B of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78u-2), in proceedings commenced pursuant to sections 15B, 15C, and 17A of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-4, 78o-5, or 78q-1) for which the OCC is the appropriate regulatory agency under section 3(a)(34) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(34)), the Comptroller may impose a civil money penalty against the following: ( 1 ) A bank that is a municipal securities dealer, any person associated with a bank that is a municipal securities dealer, or any person seeking to become associated with a bank that is a municipal securities dealer;
( 2 ) A bank that is a government securities broker or government securities dealer, any person associated with a bank that is a government securities broker or government securities dealer, or any person seeking to become associated with a government securities broker or government securities dealer; or
( 3 ) A bank that is a transfer agent, any person associated with a bank that is a transfer agent, or any person seeking to become associated with a bank that is a transfer agent.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section: ( 1 ) The term *bank* means a national bank or Federal savings association, and, when referring to a government securities broker or government securities dealer, a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank;
( 2 ) The terms *transfer agent, municipal securities dealer, government securities broker,* and *government securities dealer* have the same meaning as such terms in sections 3(a)(25), 3(a)(30), 3(a)(43), and 3(a)(44) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(25), 78c(a)(30), 78c(a)(43), and 78c(a)(44)), respectively;
( 3 ) The term *person associated with a bank that is a municipal securities dealer* has the same meaning as *person associated with a municipal securities dealer* in section 3(a)(32) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(32));
( 4 ) The term *person associated with a bank that is a government securities broker or government securities dealer* has the same meaning as *person associated with a government securities broker or government securities dealer* in section 3(a)(45) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(45)); and
( 5 ) The term *person associated with a bank that is a transfer agent* has the same meaning as *person associated with a transfer agent* in section 3(a)(49) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(49)).
( c ) *Public basis of proceedings; private hearings.* All proceedings under this section must be commenced, and the notice of assessment must be filed, on a public basis, unless otherwise ordered by the Comptroller. Pursuant to § 19.33(a), any request for a private hearing may be filed within 20 days of service of the notice.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of DHB  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dawn Schlegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 30, 2004                         By: /s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
                                                  ______________________________
                                                       Dawn M. Schlegel
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


This certification  accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-Q for The Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


        The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane
Investment Corporation, the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund. L.P.,
that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the fnancial condition and results of operations of The
Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.



/s/ Robert L. Lerner
----------------------
Robert L. Lerner
President
Ruvane Investment Corporation, the general
partner of The Willowbridge Fund L.P.
Order entered January 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01407-CV

CHRISTIAN CARE CENTERS, INC., Appellant

V.

REBECCA O'BANION AND JANIS L. WOOD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVES OF TEH ESTATE OF J.D. RICHMOND, DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-12201

ORDER

We GRANT appellees/cross-appellants’ January 6, 2014 unopposed motion to extend 

time to file reply to appellant’s brief and cross-appellee’s response brief. We ORDER the brief 

be filed no later than January 22, 2014. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent 

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2022076EN.01000301.xml

| 17.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 February 2022

(2022/C 76/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1372 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4410 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5363 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0516 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1095 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,365 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4961 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9436 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,4810 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4416 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8712 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7108 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5291 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 361,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2140 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2101 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5295 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 232,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7595 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,346 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,3679 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,771 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,8765 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1718 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3885 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1372

JPY

Japanese yen

131,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4410

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83940

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5363

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0516

ISK

Iceland króna

141,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1095

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,365

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4961

RON

Romanian leu

4,9436

TRY

Turkish lira

15,4810

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4416

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8712

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7108

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5291

KRW

South Korean won

1 361,31

ZAR

South African rand

17,2140

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2101

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5295

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 232,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7595

PHP

Philippine peso

58,346

RUB

Russian rouble

85,3679

THB

Thai baht

36,771

BRL

Brazilian real

5,8765

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1718

INR

Indian rupee

85,3885

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Barings Private Credit Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan A. Landsberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ JONATHAN A. LANDSBERGJonathan A. LandsbergChief Financial OfficerFebruary 23, 2022