alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on ISIS-K Leader Sanaullah Ghafari and Kabul Airport Attack

# 									Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on ISIS-K Leader Sanaullah Ghafari and Kabul Airport Attack							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 7, 2022

The U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice (RFJ) program, administered by the Diplomatic Security Service, is offering a reward of up to $10 million each for information leading to the identification or location of ISIS-K leader Sanaullah Ghafari, also known as Shahab al-Muhajir, and for information leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of those responsible for the August 26, 2021, terrorist attack at the Kabul airport.

In June 2020, Sanaullah Ghafari was appointed by the ISIS core to lead ISIS-K. Ghafari is responsible for approving all ISIS-K operations throughout Afghanistan and arranging funding to conduct operations. On November 22, 2021, the Department of State designated Ghafari as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist under Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, as amended.

On August 26, 2021, terrorists launched a suicide bombing against the airport as the United States and other governments conducted a large-scale evacuation of their citizens and vulnerable Afghans from the country. At least 185 people were killed in the attack, including 13 U.S. service members supporting evacuation operations. More than 150 people, including 18 U.S. service members, were wounded. ISIS-K claimed responsibility for the attack.

On September 29, 2015, the U.S. government designated ISIS-K as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), and on January 14, 2016, the Department of State designated it a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).

More information about this reward offer is located on the Rewards for Justice website at www.rewardsforjustice.net. We encourage anyone with information on past or planned attacks against U.S. persons or property in Afghanistan to text Rewards for Justice via Signal, Telegram, or WhatsApp at +1-202-702-7843. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

Since its inception in 1984, the program has paid more than $200 million to more than 100 people across the globe who provided actionable information that helped prevent terrorism, bring terrorist leaders to justice, and resolve threats to U.S. national security. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/RFJ_USA.

Tags

AfghanistanBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for JusticeTerrorismTerrorist Designation

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                         DEMAND NOTE
                               
  
$35,000                                             April 8, 1996


  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Casino 
Resource  Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, the principal amount of 
Thirty-five Thousand and no/100 ($35,000.00) Dollars with interest thereon at 
prime as published from U.S. Banking in the Wall Street Journal this date, 
plus one (1%) percent, adjusted annually. Principal and interest shall be due 
upon demand. This and other executed notes are secured by One Hundred 
Thousand (100,000) shares of Casino Resource Corporation stock.

  All makers, endorsers, sureties and guarantors agree to pay all costs of 
collection, including  reasonable fees to the extent not prohibited by law.

  Without affecting my liability or the liability of an endorser, surety or 
guarantor, the holder may, without notice, grant renewals or extensions, 
accept partial payments, release or impair any collateral security for this 
Note or agree not to sue any party liable on it. Presentment, protest, 
demands and notice of dishonor are waived.

  The maker of this Note reserves the right to prepay principal at any time 
in any amounts without penalty.

  This note has been executed and delivered in the state of Mississippi and 
shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of 
Mississippi.

  Maker acknowledges receipt of an exact copy of this Note.


/s/ John J. Pilger
----------------------------------
John J. Pilger
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

734.2 

CA 11-00925 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

BRIAN S. DERMODY AND GINA V. DERMODY, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

DARRYL D. TILTON, SANDRA J. TILTON, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 3.)

 

OHL & ALEXSON, HONEOYE (WAYNE I. OHL OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

THE BROCKLEBANK FIRM, CANANDAIGUA (DEREK G. BROCKLEBANK OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Ontario County

(William F. Kocher, A.J.), dated August 24, 2010. The decision

concluded that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against

defendants Darryl D. Tilton and Sandra J. Tilton should be granted. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Pecora v Lawrence, 28 AD3d 1136, 1137). 

Entered: June 17, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# C_2023239EN.01000101.xml

| 6.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 July 2023

(2023/C 239/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0879 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4482 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,8295 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9782 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,6455 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,775 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 378,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4558 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9515 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 28,3828 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6329 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4447 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5108 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7590 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4714 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,3894 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8798 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 380,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0620 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,328 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,979 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2933 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5602 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,5175 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0879

JPY

Japanese yen

157,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4482

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85685

SEK

Swedish krona

11,8295

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9782

ISK

Iceland króna

149,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,6455

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,775

HUF

Hungarian forint

378,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4558

RON

Romanian leu

4,9515

TRY

Turkish lira

28,3828

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6329

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4447

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5108

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7590

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4714

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,29

ZAR

South African rand

20,3894

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8798

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 380,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0620

PHP

Philippine peso

60,328

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,979

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2933

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5602

INR

Indian rupee

89,5175

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
ex10-10.htm


EXHIBIT 10.10

 

Description of Director Compensation

 

Directors who are employees of YuMe, Inc. (“YuMe”) do not receive compensation from YuMe for the services they provide as directors.  Each non-employee director will be eligible to receive compensation for his or her service consisting of annual cash retainers and equity awards as follows:

 

	
Position
	 	
Retainer
	 
	
Board Member
	 	$	30,000	 
	
Lead Independent Director
	 	 	15,000	 
	
Audit Committee Chair
	 	 	20,000	 
	
Compensation Committee Chair
	 	 	15,000	 
	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
	 	 	7,500	 
	
Audit Committee Member
	 	 	7,500	 
	
Compensation Committee Member
	 	 	7,500	 
	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
	 	 	3,500	 


 

Each of the above-mentioned cash retainers will be paid in four quarterly installments. Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for customary travel expenses incurred attending Company meetings and for continuing education opportunities. The Company does not pay, and its directors do not receive, any “per-meeting” fees.

 

Equity awards consist of an initial stock option or restricted stock unit grant, upon first appointment to our board of directors, with a Black-Scholes value of $175,000, and annual awards at each meeting of the stockholders thereafter with a Black-Scholes value of $85,000. Options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of YuMe’s common stock on the date of grant and vest annually over three years after the grant date (for initial grants) or one year after the grant date (for annual grants). Restricted stock awards will be granted with a fair market value equal to the closing price of YuMe’s common stock on the date of grant and vest over three years after the grant date (for initial grants) or one year after the grant date (for annual grants).
# C_2022073EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 73/01)

Last publication

OJ C 64, 7.2.2022

Past publications

OJ C 51, 31.1.2022

OJ C 37, 24.1.2022

OJ C 24, 17.1.2022

OJ C 11, 10.1.2022

OJ C 2, 3.1.2022

OJ C 513, 20.12.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2004319EN.01007001.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/70

---

Action brought on 31 August 2004 by Fesil ASA and Finnfjord Smelteverk AS against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-5/04)

(2004/C 319/12)

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 31 August 2004 by Fesil ASA and Finnfjord Smelteverk AS, represented by Jan Magne Langseth, Advokat, Advokatfirmaet Schjødt AS, Dronning Mauds gt. 11, P.b. 2444 Solli, N-0201 Oslo.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and

| 2. | Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL (the ‘Decision’) concludes that the Norwegian measure exempting the manufacturing and the mining industries from the tax on electricity consumption constitutes State aid and that it constitutes new aid as from 1 January 2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL (the ‘Decision’) concludes that the Norwegian measure exempting the manufacturing and the mining industries from the tax on electricity consumption constitutes State aid and that it constitutes new aid as from 1 January 2002.

| — | The Decision concludes that the relevant measures are incompatible with the EEA Agreement and the incompatible aid must be recovered from the aid recipients. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Decision concludes that the relevant measures are incompatible with the EEA Agreement and the incompatible aid must be recovered from the aid recipients.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority has not made a correct assessment of Article 61(1) EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has not made a correct assessment of Article 61(1) EEA.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority misuses its powers under the EEA Agreement by its incorrect application of Article 61(3) EEA and the Environmental Guidelines. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority misuses its powers under the EEA Agreement by its incorrect application of Article 61(3) EEA and the Environmental Guidelines.

| — | There is no legal basis for recovery of the alleged aid from the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

There is no legal basis for recovery of the alleged aid from the applicants.

---
§ 1092.200 Scope and purpose. ( a ) *Scope.* This subpart requires nonbank covered persons that are subject to certain public agency and court orders to register with the Bureau and to submit a copy of each such public order to the Bureau. This subpart also requires certain nonbank covered persons that are supervised by the Bureau to prepare and submit an annual written statement, signed by a designated individual, regarding compliance with each such public order. Finally, this subpart also describes the registration information the Bureau may make publicly available.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purposes of the information collection requirements contained in this subpart are: ( 1 ) To support Bureau functions by monitoring for risks to consumers in the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services, including developments in markets for such products or services, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5512(c)(1);
( 2 ) To prescribe rules regarding registration requirements applicable to nonbank covered persons, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5512(c)(7);
( 3 ) To facilitate the supervision of persons described in 12 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1), pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5514(b);
( 4 ) To assess and detect risks to consumers, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5514(b); and
( 5 ) To ensure that persons described in 12 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1) are legitimate entities and are able to perform their obligations to consumers, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5514(b).
§ 21.5134 Restrictions on paying benefits to servicepersons. The Department of Veterans Affairs may not pay benefits to a serviceperson (other than one enrolled in a course, courses or a program of education leading to a secondary school diploma or an equivalency certificate) unless he or she: ( a ) Has completed 3 months of contributions to the fund or has made a lump-sum payment which is the equivalent of at least 3 months of contributions to the fund;
( b ) Has agreed either to have a monthly deduction from his or her military pay, or has made a lump-sum contribution to the fund, or both, so that the 12 months participation requirement of § 21.5052(a) of this part will be met; and
( c ) Is serving on active duty in an enlistment period subsequent to the initial period of active duty defined in § 21.5040(b)(3) of this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3221, 3231, Pub. L. 94-502)
[45 FR 31, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 51746, Nov. 17, 1982; 54 FR 49977, Dec. 4, 1989]
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Ching Lung Po
-----------------------
Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Mongolia

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Mongolia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mongolia  

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Mongolia 

During the review period, the government’s budget and information on debt obligations were widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.The budget was substantially complete and generally reliable.Information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available, including online.The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to audit or oversight, although the government disclosed their existence and moved to publish a portion of them toward the end of the review period.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence, reviewed the government’s accounts, and made its reports publicly available.The process for allocating licenses and contracts for natural resource extraction was outlined in law and appeared to be followed in practice.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.The sovereign wealth fund disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals, although there were some inconsistencies.

Mongolia’s fiscal transparency would be enhanced by:

-  Eliminating off-budget accounts or subjecting them to adequate oversight and audit.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mongolia  

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMongolia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2023060EN.01000801.xml

| 17.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 February 2023

(2023/C 60/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0700 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4490 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88883 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1420 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9873 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 154,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9513 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,685 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 382,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7765 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9009 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,1685 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5500 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4334 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3985 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7033 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4287 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 376,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4066 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3351 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 193,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7123 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,011 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,738 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6090 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8720 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,4574 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0700

JPY

Japanese yen

143,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4490

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88883

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1420

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9873

ISK

Iceland króna

154,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9513

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,685

HUF

Hungarian forint

382,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7765

RON

Romanian leu

4,9009

TRY

Turkish lira

20,1685

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5500

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4334

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3985

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7033

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4287

KRW

South Korean won

1 376,52

ZAR

South African rand

19,4066

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3351

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 193,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7123

PHP

Philippine peso

59,011

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,738

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6090

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8720

INR

Indian rupee

88,4574

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Home1999 Treaties and Agreements...Saint Kitts and Nevis (99-311) – Agreement regarding Defense Articles and Services

# 									Saint Kitts and Nevis (99-311) – Agreement regarding Defense Articles and Services							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

March 11, 1999

Defense

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Bridgetown and Basseterre November 13, 1998 and March 11, 1999; entered into force March 11, 1999.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

DefenseDefense ArticlesDrug TraffickingPolitical-Military CooperationSaint Kitts and NevisTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
#### BLEVINS V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 28, 1912.)

Appeal from Cullman County Court.

Heard before Hon. J. D. Burke.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant At- . torney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In Re: THE ARKANSAS CRIMINAL CODE REVISION COMMISSION, Ex Parte In The Matter of Rules of Criminal Procedure

74-345

PER CURIAM

The» Arkansas Criminal Code Revision Commission in their amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure as published by the Bobbs-Merrill Company included in their amended Rule 36.10 a subsection (d). This subsection was inadvertently omitted from our Per Curiam order of December 22, 1975. Rule 36.10 is hereby amended by adding thereto subsection (d) as follows:

> (d) A decision by the Arkansas Supreme Court sustaining in its entirety an order appealed under subsection (a) hereof shall bar further proceedings against the defendant on the charge.

> This amendment shall be effective 30 days after this date.

*876In Re Rules of Criminal Procedure. Per Curiam. The fourth word in Rule 32.1 is changed from “shall” to “may,” so that the use of the questionnaires becomes discretionary instead of mandatory. The court’s decision to make this change is based upon the recommendation of a majority of the Criminal Code Revision Commission and a majority of the circuit judges.

In Re Model Criminal Jury Instructions. Per curiam. The Honorable Bobby Steel, at his own request, is relieved as a member of the Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The court expresses its appreciation to Judge Steel for his services on the committee.