alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2656 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2656

To amend the Graton Rancheria Restoration Act to give the Secretary of 
       the Interior discretion regarding taking land into trust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2003

Ms. Woolsey (for herself and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Graton Rancheria Restoration Act to give the Secretary of 
       the Interior discretion regarding taking land into trust.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO GIVE SECRETARY AND STATE DISCRETION CONCERNING 
              TRUST LANDS.

    (a) Review.--Section 1404 of the Graton Rancheria Restoration Act 
(25 U.S.C. 1300n-2) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(f) Review.--No land taken into trust for the benefit of the 
Tribe shall be construed to satisfy the terms for an exception under 
section 20(b)(1)(B) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2719(b)(1)(B)) to the prohibition on gaming on lands acquired by the 
Secretary in trust for the benefit of an Indian tribe after October 17, 
1988, under section 20(a) of such Act (25 U.S.C. 2719(a)).''.
    (b) Land Into Trust.--Section 1405(a) of the Graton Rancheria 
Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300n-3(a)) is amended by striking ``shall'' 
and inserting ``may''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, James T. Posillico provides the following certification.

     I, James T. Posillico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitro
Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company") certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14)
          for the registrant and have designed such disclosure controls and
          procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company
          is made know to me by others, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
          auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
          performing the equivalent functions):

               a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                    internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
                    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
                    date and have identified for the Company's auditors any
                    material weaknesses in internal controls, and

               b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                    or other employees which have a significant role in the
                    Company's internal controls; and

               6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not
                    there were significant changes in internal control or in
                    other factors that could significantly affect internal
                    controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
                    evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
                    significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     Date: September 14, 2005

                                            ------------------------------
                                            James T. Posillico, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          47,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,791
<PP&E>                                          62,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          539,926
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,057
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,447,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,780
<SALES>                                        288,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,691
<CGS>                                           81,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,247,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (914,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (914,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (914,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be Thursday, November 12, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be held Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: October 1, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24108 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 1101.2 Authority and functions. ( a ) The Council was established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (Act), 12 U.S.C. 3301-3308. It is composed of the Comptroller of the Currency; the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; a Governor of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; the Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board; and the Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration Board.
( b ) The statutory functions of the Council are set out at 12 U.S.C. 3305. In summary, the mission of the Council is to promote consistency and progress in federal examination and supervision of financial institutions and their affiliates. The Council is empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards, and reporting forms and systems; make recommendations in the interest of uniformity; and conduct examiner schools open to personnel of the agencies represented on the Council and employees of state financial institutions supervisory agencies.
SCALE 1:24,000

WESTHAMPTON QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Westhampton Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1972.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Geology mapped by C.R. Warren in 1976 (unpublished).

Distribution of bedrock outcrops from Clark (1987). Some

postglacial units mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

(SHEET 13 of 24)

(C

H

E

S

TE

R)

(EA

S

THA

M

P

TO

N)

(GOSHEN)

(WORONOCO)

72°45'0"W

72°45'0"W

72°52'30"W

72°52'30"W

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.
#### Solomon J. Pakas, Respondent, *v.*William R. Hollingshead et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Spiegelberg & Wise (Edmond E. Wise, of counsel), for appellants.

Max D. Steuer, for respondent.

Conlan, J.

The action was one upon contract for the purchase and delivery of certain goods, which the defendants were requested to furnish to the plaintiff. The trial justice, in his charge to the jury, distinctly submitted to them each and every one of the fourteen requests by the defendants in the precise language requested, *749in addition to the general question that they were to determine under the contract whether the plaintiff was entitled to have delivered to him a distinct article, as to which testimony had been adduced upon the trial, and there were no exceptions by the defendants to any portion of the charge. There was no refusal and, therefore, no exception to a refusal. The jury, after their deliberations, reached the conclusion that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. There was no dispute as to the amount if the jury found for the plaintiff.

We are not inclined to disturb this finding, and the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
# C_2022393EN.01000401.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 October 2022

(2022/C 393/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9706 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4399 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0200 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9664 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,561 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 429,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8495 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9400 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0427 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5525 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3395 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,6192 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7372 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3941 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 384,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6876 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9603 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 907,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5448 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,148 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,902 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1378 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4522 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8955 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9706

JPY

Japanese yen

142,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4399

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87840

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0200

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9664

ISK

Iceland króna

140,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,561

HUF

Hungarian forint

429,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8495

RON

Romanian leu

4,9400

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0427

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5525

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3395

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,6192

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7372

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3941

KRW

South Korean won

1 384,66

ZAR

South African rand

17,6876

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9603

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 907,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5448

PHP

Philippine peso

57,148

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,902

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1378

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4522

INR

Indian rupee

79,8955

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GEORGE GRIGSBY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 12

- 1672 (EGS)

)

JUDGE MARY THOMAS, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of George Grigsby’s pro se “Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, 2254.” P etitioner is challenging “ THE

DECISION OF JUDGE MARY MAXWELL O R JUDE THOMAS OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS TO PLACE HI M IN A MENTAL INSTIT UTION WITHOUT

A GRAND JURY INDICTM ENT .” Pet. at 1 (emphasis in original).

It is unclear whether the petitioner currently is in custody for purposes of habeas relief.

See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c) (requiring some form of custody as the basis for seeking habeas relief).

Assuming that the petitioner is currently in custody, his r ecourse lies in the judicial district

having personal jurisdiction over his immediate custodian. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 546 U.S. 426,

434

- 35 (200 4); Blair

- Bey v. Quick , 151 F.3d 1036, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citing Chatman

- Bey v.

Thornburgh , 864 F.2d 804, 810 (D.C. Cir. 1988)). And, “ a district court may not entertain a

habeas petition involving present phys i cal custody unless the respondent custod ian is within its

territorial jurisdiction. ” Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 374 F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. Cir. 2004).2 Neither the petitioner nor his custodian are located in the District of Columbia, and this Court,

therefore, cannot entertain this petition. Accordingly, the petition will be denied and this case

will be dismissed. An Order is issued separately.

Signed: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

United States District Judge

Dated: November 5, 2012
§ 1815.112 Preparation of an environmental assessment. ( a ) The Fund shall begin the preparation of an environmental assessment as early as possible after the designated Fund official has determined that it is required. The Fund may prepare an environmental assessment at any time to assist planning and decisionmaking.
( b ) An environmental assessment is a concise public document used to determine whether to prepare an EIS. An environmental assessment aids in complying with the NEPA when no EIS is necessary, and it facilitates the preparation of an EIS, if one is necessary. The environmental assessment shall contain brief discussions of the following topics: ( 1 ) Purpose and need for the proposed action;
( 2 ) Description of the proposed action;
( 3 ) Alternatives considered, including the no action alternative;
( 4 ) Environmental effects of the proposed action and alternative actions; and
( 5 ) Listing of agencies, organizations or persons consulted.
( c ) The most important or significant environmental consequences and effects on the areas listed below should be addressed in the environmental assessment. Only those areas which are specifically relevant to the particular proposal should be addressed. Those areas should be addressed in as much detail as is necessary to allow an analysis of the alternatives and the proposal. The areas to be considered are the following: ( 1 ) Natural/ecological features (such as floodplain, wetlands, coastal zones, wildlife refuges, and endangered species);
( 2 ) Air quality;
( 3 ) Sound levels;
( 4 ) Water supply, wastewater treatment and water runoff;
( 5 ) Energy requirements and conservation;
( 6 ) Solid waste;
( 7 ) Transportation;
( 8 ) Community facilities and services;
( 9 ) Social and economic;
( 10 ) Historic and aesthetic; and
( 11 ) Other relevant factors.
( d ) If the Fund completes an environmental assessment and determines that an EIS is not required, then the Fund shall prepare a finding of no significant impact. The finding of no significant impact shall be made available to the public by the Fund as specified in 40 CFR 1506.6 of the CEQ regulations.
§ 1268.3 Asset requirement. Assets that qualify as AMA shall be limited to the following: ( a ) Whole loans that are eligible to secure advances under § 1266.7(a)(1)(i), ( a ) (2)(ii), (a)(4), or (b)(1) of this chapter, excluding: ( 1 ) Single-family mortgage loans where the loan amount exceeds the limits established pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1717(b)(2), unless the loan is guaranteed or insured by an agency or department of the U.S. government, in which case the limits in 12 U.S.C. 1717(b)(2) do not apply; and ( 2 ) Loans made to an entity, or secured by property, not located in a state; ( b ) Whole loans secured by manufactured housing, regardless of whether such housing qualifies as residential real property under applicable state law; ( c ) State and local housing finance agency bonds; or ( d ) Certificates representing interests in whole loans if: ( 1 ) The loans qualify as AMA under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section and meet the nexus requirement of § 1268.4; and ( 2 ) The certificates: ( i ) Meet the credit enhancement requirements of § 1268.5; ( ii ) Are issued pursuant to an agreement between the Bank and a participating financial institution to share risks consistent with the requirements of this part; and ( iii ) Are acquired substantially by the initiating Bank or Banks.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Saudi Arabia (23-508) – Agreement for Technical Cooperation

# 									Saudi Arabia (23-508) – Agreement for Technical Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

May 8, 2023

Civil Affairs: Technical Cooperation

Signed at Jeddah May 8, 2023; entered into force May 8, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [6 MB]

Tags

Civil AffairsSaudi ArabiaTreaties

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARYL WENDELL BARLEY, a/k/a Black,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cr-00010-JLK-1)

Submitted: November 16, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

Daryl Wendell Barley, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Wendell Barley seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting relief on 

his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-

391, 132 Stat. 5194, and granting Barley’s motion for reconsideration but declining to 

further reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Barley, No. 4:10-cr-00010-JLK-1 (W.D. Va. May 

18, 2020; June 3, 2020). We deny Barley’s motion for appointment of counsel and grant 

his motion for leave to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED