### 52916 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

you cannot positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or –2 disc assembly is not installed, within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD or within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the tail rotor driveshaft system to determine if P/N 101584–1 or –2 is installed.

(3) If, during the maintenance records check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or –2 disc assembly is not installed, no further action is required. Before further flight, make an entry in the log book showing compliance with this AD.

(4) If, during the maintenance records check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or –2 disc assembly is installed, within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD or within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or –2 with disc assembly P/N 32721–1.

(5) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or –2.

FAA AD Differences

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ or service information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222–5122; fax: (817) 222–5961. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.

Related Information

(h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada, AD No. CF–2010–07, dated February 24, 2010; Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 206–09–123, REV A, dated June 10, 2009; and Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 206L–09–157, REV A, dated June 10, 2009, for related information.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 19,
2010. Mark R. Schilling, Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21589 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0107; FRL–9190–1]**

**RIN–2060–AQ45**

**Action To Ensure Authority To Issue Permits Under the Prevention of**  **Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas**  **Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of public hearing.

**SUMMARY :**  The EPA is announcing a public hearing to be held for the proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan’’ which will publish in the near future in the Federal Register . The hearing will be held on September 14, 2010, in Arlington, VA.

**DATES :**  The public hearing will be held on September 14, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  The September 14, 2010 hearing will be held at the EPA Ariel Rios East building, Room 1153, 1301 Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20460. The public hearing will convene at 9 a.m. (Eastern standard time) and continue until the later of 6 p.m. or 1 hour after the last registered speaker has spoken. The EPA will make every effort to accommodate all speakers that arrive and register. A lunch break is scheduled from 12:30 p.m. until 2 p.m. Because this hearing is being held at U.S. government facilities, individuals planning to attend the hearing should be prepared to show valid picture identification to the security staff in order to gain access to the meeting room. In addition, you will need to obtain a property pass for any personal belongings you bring with you. Upon leaving the building, you will be required to return this property pass to the security desk. No large signs will be allowed in the building, cameras may only be used outside of the building, and demonstrations will not be allowed on federal property for security reasons. The EPA Web Site for the rulemaking, which includes the proposal and information about the public hearing, can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/

nsr.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  If you would like to present oral testimony at the public hearing, please contact Ms. Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Planning Division, (C504–03), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone (919) 541–0641, fax number (919) 541– 5509, e-mail address: long.pam@epa.gov (preferred method for registering), no later than September 10, 2010. If using e-mail, please provide the following information: Time you wish to speak (morning, afternoon, evening), name, affiliation, address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers.

Questions concerning the August 2010 proposed rule should be addressed to Ms. Lisa Sutton, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, New Source Review Group, (C504–03), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711,telephone number (919) 541–3450, email at sutton.lisa@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The public hearing is to provide the public an opportunity to present oral comments regarding EPA’s proposed

‘‘Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan, ’’ which proposes a Federal Implementation Plan to apply in any state that is unable to submit, by its deadline, a corrective State Implementation Plan revision to ensure that the state has authority to issue permits under the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration program for sources of greenhouse gases.

Public hearing: The proposal for which EPA is holding the public hearing will publish in the near future in the Federal Register and is available
at: http://www.epa.gov/nsr and also in the rulemaking docket. The public hearing will provide interested parties the opportunity to present data, views, or arguments concerning the proposal. The EPA may ask clarifying questions during the oral presentations, but will not respond to the presentations at that time. Written statements and supporting information submitted during the comment period will be considered with the same weight as oral comments and supporting information presented at


### 52917 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

the public hearing. Written comments on the proposed rule must be postmarked by October 14, 2010, 30 days after the September 14, 2010 hearing.

Commenters should notify Ms. Long if they will need specific equipment, or if there are other special needs related to providing comments at the hearing. The EPA will provide equipment for commenters to show overhead slides or make computerized slide presentations if we receive special requests in advance. Oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes for each commenter. The EPA encourages commenters to provide EPA with a copy of their oral testimony electronically (via e-mail or CD) or in hard copy form.

The hearing schedule, including lists of speakers, will be posted on EPA’s Web Site http://www.epa.gov/nsr. Verbatim transcripts of the hearings and written statements will be included in the docket for the rulemaking.

EPA will make every effort to follow the schedule as closely as possible on the day of the hearing; however, please plan for the hearing to run either ahead of schedule or behind schedule.
How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

The EPA has established a docket for the proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan’’ under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2010–0107 (available at http:// www.regulations.gov ). As stated previously, the proposed rule will publish in the near future in the Federal Register and is available at http://www.epa.gov/nsr and in the rulemaking docket.

Dated: August 24, 2010. Mary Henigin, Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2010–21691 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE** 

**Defense Acquisition Regulations System** 

**48 CFR Parts 211, 246, and 252**

**Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS);**  **Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items, DFARS Case 2009–D018** 

**AGENCY :**  Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule with request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a policy memorandum of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics dated February 6, 2007, that required definition of the requirements to track warranties for items subject to Item Unique Identification in the Item Unique Identification registry. This proposed rule stresses that the enforcement of warranties is essential to the effectiveness and efficiency of DoD’s material readiness.

**DATES :**  Comments on this proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before October 29, 2010, to be considered in the formation of the final rule.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2009–D018, using any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2009–D018 in the subject line of the message.

Fax: 703–602–0350. Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Julian E. Thrash, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP/DARS, Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060.

Comments received generally will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Julian E. Thrash, 703–602–0310.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  A. Background

The Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics issued a policy memorandum dated February 6, 2007, that instructed the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, to define the requirements to track warranties for items subject to Item Unique Identification (IUID) in the IUID registry. This proposed rule addresses the requirement to more effectively track warranties for IUID items.

The tracking of warranties, from the identification of the requirement to the expiration date of the warranted item, will enhance significantly the ability of DoD to take full advantage of warranties when they are part of an acquisition. Presently, DoD lacks the enterprise capability that would provide visibility and accountability of warranty data associated with acquired goods. The capability to track warranties will result in—

(a) Reduced costs; (b) Ability to recognize benefits included for free;

(c) Ability to compare performance against Government specified warranties;

(d) Increased level of insurance for purchased goods;

(e) Sufficient durations of warranties for specific goods;

(f) Ability to identify and enforce warranties ( e.g., against fraudulent vendors, or for criminal actions).

DoD proposes the following changes:

• Revise DFARS 211.274–2(a)(4), Policy for unique item identification, to add any warranted item.

• Revise the definitions of

‘‘ acceptance ’’ and ‘‘ defect, ’’ and add a definition for ‘‘warranty tracking’’ at DFARS 246.701.

• Add DFARS 246.710(5) to include provision and clause prescriptions 252.246–70XX and 252.246–70YY.

• Revise DFARS 252.211–7003, Item Identification and Valuation, definition of ‘‘issuing agency. ’’

• Add provision 252.246–70XX, Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items.

• Add clause 252.246–70YY, Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items.

This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 20, 1993. This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

DoD has prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603 et seq. A copy of the analysis may be obtained from the point of contact specified herein. The objective of this rule is for DoD to develop a more effective way to track warranties for items subject to Item Unique Identification (IUID). Presently, DoD lacks the enterprise capability that would provide visibility and accountability of warranty data