alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23813]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6778]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rembrandt's People''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Rembrandt's People'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of 
Art, Hartford, CT, from on or about October 10, 2009, until on or about 
January 24, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C 
Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 28, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-23813 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
ex101to8k04197004_05032015.htm



Exhibit 10.1


 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement (this “Amendment”) is dated as of May 3, 2015, and is between SP Corporate Services LLC (“SP Corporate”), a Delaware limited liability company having an office at 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10022, and Handy & Harman Ltd., a Delaware corporation and Handy & Harman Group Ltd., a Delaware corporation (collectively, the “Company”), having an office at 1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite N-222, White Plains, New York 10604.


 


RECITALS


 


The Company and SP Corporate are parties to a Management Services Agreement dated as of January 1, 2012, as amended by the First Amendment to Management Services Agreement dated as of March 27, 2013 (the “Management Services Agreement”), whereby SP Corporate furnishes the Company and its subsidiaries with certain Services. The parties desire to amend the Management Services Agreement to clarify the Additional Corporate Services to be provided by SP Corporate to the Company and to modify the payments to be made by the Company to SP Corporate.


 


1.           Defined Terms.  Defined terms used but not defined in this Amendment are as defined in the Management Services Agreement.


 


2.           Amendment to Section 3.01(b).  In Section 3.01(b) of the Management Services Agreement, the amount “7,145,046” shall be changed to read “8,810,934.”


 


3.           Amendment to Exhibit B.  Exhibit B to the Management Services Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following to the list of Additional Corporate Services:


 



	
  

	
·

	
Operating group management services.







 


4.           Confirmation of Agreement.  All other terms of the Management Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


5.           Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




  





  











  






 


The parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 



	  	
SP CORPORATE SERVICES LLC


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:

	

/s/ Jack L. Howard




	  	  	
Name:

	
Jack L. Howard


	  	  	
Title:

	
President













	  	
HANDY & HARMAN LTD.


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:

	

/s/ James F. McCabe, Jr.




	  	  	
Name:

	
James F. McCabe, Jr.


	  	  	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President and CFO













	  	
HANDY & HARMAN GROUP LTD.


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:

	

/s/ James F. McCabe, Jr.




	  	  	
Name:

	
James F. McCabe, Jr.


	  	  	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President









 


 


 


 



[Signature Page to Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51125-51126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Fredonia Flood Retarding Structure Rehabilitation Project, 
Coconino County, AZ

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS) Regulations (7 CFR part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Fredonia 
Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) Rehabilitation Project, Coconino 
County, Arizona.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. McKay, State Conservationist, 
USDA-NRCS, 230 North First Avenue, Suite 509, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, 
telephone: (602) 280-8801.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this

[[Page 51126]]

federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. 
Based on evidence presented, David L. McKay, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement are not needed for this project.
    The project proposes to decommission the Fredonia FRS by converting 
the dam to a levee/floodway and directing flows north to a floodway 
discharging to Kanab Creek. This will meet the project purpose of 
providing for continued 100-year flood protection for the Town of 
Fredonia, Arizona, and surrounding areas.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. Copies of 
the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the above 
address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment are 
on file and may be reviewed by contacting Don Paulus, Assistant State 
Conservationist for Programs, at the above address.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials.)

    Dated: September 28, 2009.
David L. McKay,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E9-23890 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
# C_2021507EN.01001001.xml

| 16.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 507/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 507/10

---

New national sides of euro circulation coins

(2021/C 507/05)

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large.

The French national sides of the regular 1-euro and 2-euro coins are renewed for the first time since the introduction of the euro, in order to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the introduction of the euro. It thus complies with the conditions set out in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 729/2014, which stipulates that changes to the designs used for the national sides of regular coins may only be made once every 15 years.

The French national sides of the other denominations remain unchanged.

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Euro | 2 Euro |

Image 1

Image 2

1 Euro

2 Euro

Issuing country: France

Date of issue:1 January 2022

Description of the designs: The new design is in line with the symbolism that already existed on the regular 1-euro and 2-euro coins: the tree of life. The new design represents a mixture of the two species that make up the emblem of the Republic: the oak, image of strength and solidity, and the olive tree, symbol of peace.

The coins’ outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

The edge-lettering of the 2-euro coin is: 2 * *, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p.1, OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p.6 and OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8 for a reference to the other euro coins.

---
#### § 8.16 Conversion of a 5-year level premium term policy as provided for under § 1904 of title 38 U.S.C.

National Service Life Insurance on the level premium term plan which is in force may be exchanged for a permanent plan policy upon written application by the insured and the payment of the current monthly premium at the attained age for the plan of insurance selected (except where premium waiver under 38 U.S.C. 1912 is effective). The reserve (if any) on the policy will be allowed as a credit on the current monthly premium except where premium waiver is effective. Conversion to an endowment plan may not be made while the insured is totally disabled. The conversion will be made without medical examination, except when deemed necessary to determine whether an applicant for conversion to an endowment plan is totally disabled, and upon complete surrender of the term insurance while in force by payment or waiver of premium.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1904)

[61 FR 29293, June 10, 1996. Redesignated at 65 FR 7437, Feb. 15, 2000]
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 1015 Directorate ID : 2007 - SW - 069 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332C, AS332L , and AS332L 1 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 3 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent an uncommanded landing gear retraction that would cause the helicopter nose to drop and hit the ground while the rotor blades are spinning. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $293 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 hours x $ 8 5 /work- hour for the modification) (4.5 hours x $85/work - hour for the functional testing) $ 85 $383 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 761 Total US Fleet Cost $ 2,283 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number o f small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : George Schwab
Exhibit 12(a)
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (1)
  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,(dollars in thousands)
    

2004
    

2005
    

2006
    

2007
    

2008
    

2009Net income (loss)
    
    13,155
    
    41,779
    
    41,946
    
    40,982
    
    2,162
    
    (58,038
    )Income tax expense (benefit)
    
    11,305
    
    31,899
    
    32,994
    
    33,901
    
    9,349
    
    (36,101
    )Fixed charges
    
    127,933
    
    147,069
    
    173,889
    
    232,691
    
    242,877
    
    268,441Earnings
    
    152,393
    
    220,747
    
    248,829
    
    307,574
    
    254,388
    
    174,302Interest expense, net
    
    75,584
    
    89,160
    
    111,644
    
    166,003
    
    169,150
    
    196,520Rents under leases
representative of an
interest factor
    
    51,984
    
    57,544
    
    61,880
    
    66,323
    
    73,362
    
    71,556Preferred dividends
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365Fixed charges
    
    127,933
    
    147,069
    
    173,889
    
    232,691
    
    242,877
    
    268,441Ratio of earnings to
fixed
charges(2)
    
    1.2
    x
    1.5
    x
    1.4
    x
    1.3
    x
    1.0
    x
    0.6
    x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earnings divided by fixed charges.
For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges is
defined as the sum of interest expense, preferred stock dividends and the component of rental
expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts.(2)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2009, earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges by $94.1 million.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40806 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TOMMIE EDWARD WILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-150-1

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tommie Edward Wiley pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine on October 22, 1998. He appeals the district court’s two level increase to his offense level for possession of a dangerous weapon during a drug offense under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1(b)(1). According to the presentence report, a handgun was found in the trunk of a car from which Wiley sold cocaine in June 1998. Wiley argues thatNo. 99-40806 -2- there was insufficient evidence connecting him to the June 1998 offense and that the prior drug incident occurred four months before the drug offense to which he pleaded guilty. The district court’s decision to enhance under § 2D1.1(b)(1) is a factual finding which we review for clear error. United States v. Castillo , 77 F.3d 1480, 1498 (5th Cir. 1996). Wiley may be held accountable under § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possessing a firearm during a drug offense that counted as relevant conduct.
See United States v. Vaquero , 997 F.2d 78, 85 (5th Cir. 1993);

see also U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, Appendix C, Amendment 394. The information in the PSR was sufficient to establish that Wiley was involved in the June 1998 drug offense and that a gun was present where the drug trafficking occurred. Wiley did not present evidence refuting the information in the PSR, and the district court did not err in relying on the PSR to increase Wiley’s offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). See United States v. Angulo , 927 F.2d 202, 204-05 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Republic of the Congo National Day

# 									Republic of the Congo National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 15, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend best wishes and hopes for a bright future to the people of the Republic of the Congo as they celebrate the 61st anniversary of their independence.

The United States is committed to working with Congo and all its partners to address the climate crisis, and we recognize Congo’s leadership in addressing this global challenge.  We will continue to support Congo in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, and our close cooperation in health, trade, and anti-trafficking efforts will remain strong.

As you celebrate your independence, the continued partnership between the United States and the Republic of the Congo will help create a peaceful, democratic, and prosperous future in the year ahead.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonRepublic of the CongoThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by  reference  in  Registration  Statements  No.
33-81414, No. 33-90264, No. 33-93366, No. 333-11373 and No. 333-8183 of Dialogic
Corporation  on Form S-8 and in  Registration  Statements  No.  33-91164 and No.
333-11369 on Form S-3 of Dialogic  Corporation of our Reports dated February 10,
1997  appearing in and  incorporated  by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Dialogic Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 1997
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 00-40509 Summary Calendar Civil Docket #B-99-CR-460-1

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRY O’GRADY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________________________________________________ February 1, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent

Terry O’Grady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). O’Grady

has received a copy of the FPD’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the FPD’s motion to2

withdraw is GRANTED

. The FPD is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. S ee 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6469

RICHARD A. VOGENEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ZEB CREWS; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-204-2-MU)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Vogeney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

reconsideration of the court's prior order denying relief on his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 petition,

which the court properly construed as an action under 42 U.S.C. §

1983 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate.

We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Vogeney v. Crews, No. CA-95-204-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

                          AMENDMENT OF OPTION CONTRACT

         This Amendment of Option Contract by and between HealthStar Corp. ("the
Company") and ______________ (the "Optionee") is entered as of April 28, 2000.

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee entered into a Stock Option
Agreement (the "Agreement") dated December 17, 1999; and

         WHEREAS, the sale of HealthStar, Inc. to Beyond Benefits, Inc. on April
28, 2000 constituted a change in control as defined in Section 12(b)(ii) of the
HealthStar Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan ("the Plan") that would trigger
accelerated vesting of all outstanding options granted to the Optionee absent
this Amendment; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee recognize that the sale of
HealthStar, Inc. to Beyond Benefits was not the type of transaction that the
parties contemplated would result in accelerated vesting:

         The Company and Optionee hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Optionee hereby irrevocably waives Optionee's right to the
accelerated vesting of all outstanding options issued to Optionee under the
Agreement that would otherwise have resulted by virtue of such sale. All
outstanding options will continue to vest in accordance with the schedule
provided in the Agreement.

         2. No other change to or amendment of the Agreement is intended hereby.


HEALTHSTAR CORP.                              OPTIONEE



------------------------                      ------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

​

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

​

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nabors Energy Transition Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony G. Petrello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William Restrepo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

​

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

​

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

​

| ​ | ​                                           |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------|
| ​ | /s/ ANTHONY G. PETRELLO                           |
| ​ | Anthony G. Petrello                               |
| ​ | *Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| ​ | ​                                           |
| ​ | ​                                           |
| ​ | /s/ WILLIAM RESTREPO                              |
| ​ | William Restrepo                                  |
| ​ | *Chief Financial Officer*                         |
| ​ | ​                                           |
| ​ | ​                                           |
| ​ | Date: March 28, 2022                              |

​

----