T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r ab l e M a rkL. W o l f , Se n i o rD i s tr i c tJ u d g e f o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC ourtf

orthe D i s tr i c tof

M a s s a c hus e tt s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S O L I D 21, I N C . , aN e va daC orpor a t i on headqu art er ed i n L os A ng el es , C al i forni a, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. B R E I T L I N G U S A , I N C . , aC onne c t i c ut C o rp o rat i o n an d B R E IT L IN G S A , a S w i ss C orpor a t i on, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 56439 D . C. N o . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 4 5 7 - G A FPL A ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a ryA . F e e s s , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 7, 2013 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: W A R D L A W and G O U L D , C i rc ui tJudg es , and W O L F , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** 

# FI LED MA R 19 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSSo l i d 2 1 d o e s n o tc h a l l e n g e th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s d i s mi s s a l o f i t s c l a i ms 1 r e l a t e d t o i t s unr e gi s t e r e d c l a i m e d tr a de m a rk i n the gol d a l l oyw i th a n a m be rhue thati tuses i n i t s produ ct s ( “ the C ol or M ark”). 2 So l i d 2 1 , I n c . ( So l i d 2 1 ) ap p e a l s th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s d i s mi s s a l o f i t s c l a i ms a g a in s t B r e itlin g U S A , I n c . a n d B r e itlin g S A ( c o lle c tiv e ly , B r e itlin g ) p u r s u a n t to Fe d e r a l Ru l e o f

Ci v i l Pr o c e d u r e 1 2 ( b ) ( 6 ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. 1 § 1291, a nd w e r e ve r s e a nd r e m a nd. T he di stri ctcourterre d i n d i sm i ss i ng S ol i d 2 1’ s c l ai m s w i th p re j ud i ce un der R ul e 12( b) ( 6) f

orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m . S ol i d 21 ha s a l l e ge d i n i t s c om pl a i nta nd s u b m itte d s u p p o rtin g d o c u m e n ta tio n in d ic a tin g th a t its “R e d G o ld ” m a rkis r e g is te r e d in a c c o r d a n c e w ith th e L a n h a m A c t. S o lid2 1 ’s f e d e r a l r e g is tr a tio n o f

its tr a d e ma rkc o n s t i tu t e s p r i maf a c i e e v i d e n c e o f

th e ma rk ’ s v a l i d i ty , 1 5 U . S. C. § 1 05 7(b), ent i t l es S ol i d 2 1 t o a “ strong pres um pt i on ” thatthe m ark i s notgeneri c, Zo b m o n do En tm ’ t

, LLC v . Fa l l

s Me d i a , LLC , 602 F . 3d 1108, 1113 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( quot i ng K

P P e rm ane nt

M ake - U p, I nc . v . L as t i ng I

m pr e s s i on I

, I nc . , 408 F . 3d 596, 6 0 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 )), an d sh i ft s th e b u rd en t o B rei t l i n g t o sh o w “ b y a p r e p o n d e r a n c e o f

th e e v id e n c e ” th a t th e m a rkis n o t p r o te c tab le , id . a t1114 ( c i t i ng T i e T ech , In c. v. Ki n ed

yn e C o rp ., 2 9 6 F .3 d 7 7 8 , 7 8 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ; V u itto n e t Fils S. A . v . J . Y oung E nte rs . , I

nc ., 6 4 4 F .2 d 7 6 9 , 7 7 5 - 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 1 ) ) ; ac c ord Y e l low Cab C o. of

Sa cram ento v. Y

el low Cab of

E lk G rove, Inc. , 4 1 9 F .3 d 9 2 5 , 9 2 8 ( 9 thB re i t l i ng ar gu es stre nu ou sl y on app ea l thatthe pres um pt i on of a r egi st er ed 2 m a rk’ s va l i di tyi s a“ bur s t i ng” pr e s um pt i on— i n othe rw or ds , tha tonc e a ny contraryevi dence of i nv al i di ty i s pre se nt ed, the pres um pt i on l oses al l evi dent i ary s i gni f i c a nc e . H ow e ve r , the c a s e s t o w hi c h B r e i t l i ng c i t e s f orthi s pr opos i t i on, T alki ng R ai n B e v e r age C o. v . South B e ac h B e v e r age C o. , 34 9 F . 3d 60 1 (9th C i r. 2003) a nd T

i e T ec h, Inc. , 296 F . 3d 778, m e r e l yr e c ogni z e tha tthe pr e s um pt i on of val i di ty i s r ebutt abl e and m ayno tbe suff i ci enti n and of i t se l f t o p re cl ud e su m m a ry j udgm e nt . T

a lkin gR a in , 3 4 9 F .3 d a t 6 0 3 ; T i e T ec h , 2 9 6 F .3 d a t 7 8 3 ; c

f . Zobm ondo En tm ’ t , LLC , 6 0 2 F . 3 d at1 1 1 8 (n o t i n g th at , o n rem an d , th e tri er o f factm u st m e a s ur e c om pe t i t orZ obm ondo’ s e vi de nc e of thi r d pa rtyus e of

am a rk “ a ga i ns tthe pr e s um pt i on of

va l i di tya f

f or de d t o F a l l s M e di a ’ s r e gi s t e r e d m a rk a nd a ga i ns ta ny other e vi dence of di st i nct i veness thatF al l s M edi a has proffe re d”). 3 C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . O u rp r e c e d e n t m a k e s c le a rth a t th e p r e s u m p tio n o f v a lid ityis d if

f ic u lt to o v e r c o m e , e v e n a t th e s u m m a ryju d g m e n t s ta g e . Se e Zobm ondo , 60 2 F . 3d at 1115 ( “ [ T ] he pr e s um pt i on of va l i di tyi s as tr ong one , a nd the bur de n on the d e f e n d a n t n e c e s s a ryto o v e r c o m e th a t p r e s u m p tio n a t s u m m a ryju d g m e n t is heavy. ”) . B r e itlin g ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e m a rkis , in f a c t, g e n e r ic is a n a tte m p t to in tr o d u c e e v id e n c e to r e b u t th e c o m p la in t, w h ic h is im p e rm is s ib le a t th e m o tio n to di s m i s s s t a ge . W hi l e ac ourtm a y c ons i de rj udi c i a l l ynot i c e abl e f a c t s i n r e s ol vi ng 2 am o tio n to d is m is s , s e e, e . g. , C olonyC ov e s P r ops . , L L Cv . C i t yof Cars on , 640 F . 3d 94 8, 95 5 (9th C i r. 20 11 ), the i nq ui ryun der R ul e 12(b)(6) i s i nt o the adequacy of the pl ea di ng s, no tthe adequacy of the evi dence. T he part i es ’ pend i ng re qu es t s f or j ud i ci al no t i ce on appeal ar e D EN I ED .4

R EVER SED A N D R EM A N D ED .