alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                       63,185
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                8,955
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  990,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             1,492,722
<PP&E>                       574,674
<DEPRECIATION>               218,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               2,012,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        231,981
<BONDS>                      8,498,420
<COMMON>                     344,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        440,329
<PREFERRED>                  0
<OTHER-SE>                   (7,270,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 2,012,785
<SALES>                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             3,174
<CGS>                        119,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                775,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           343,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (892,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (892,210)
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 (892,210)
<EPS-BASIC>                (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (0.02)


</TABLE>
#### Angelo De Grazia, Respondent, *v.*Andrew Ferretti et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.

Weekes Brothers (John A. Weekes, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

Joel M. Marx, for respondent.

*Per Guriqm.*

Defendants offered in evidence a paper which, under the objection of plaintiff that “ there was no proof that there was any such document,” was excluded. To this ruling defendants excepted. We believe the ruling was wrong for the evidence of the plaintiff as to the paper was in effect an admission that the paper showed the agreement if the words “to his satisfaction” were excluded and so connected with this admission the paper was admissible.

*762The statement of counsel in respect to the offer of judgment was quite improper, and while we are unwilling to say that because of it the court was called upon to grant the motion that a juror be withdrawn, we feel that had defendants later in the trial, when it became apparent that they had been prejudiced by the remarks, asked for relief, it should have been accorded to him.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Present: Tbtjax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
Opinion filed Octobe r 16, 2020



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ _ ___ _ ____ 

### No. 11

- 20

- 00 202

- CR

____ __ ______ 

### JAIME RAMIREZ

- VALLES, JR. , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Tay lor County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 2418B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant entered into a plea agreement with the State . Pursuant to that plea agreement, Appellant pleaded guilty to t he thir d

- degree felony offense of possession of methamphetamine and true to one enhancement allegation

. T he trial court
assessed Appellant’s punishment
, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, at confinement for seven years

. We dismiss the appeal

. T his court notified A ppellant by letter that the t rial c ourt had certified that th is
is a plea bargain case in which Appellant has no right of appeal

. See T EX

. R.2

A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d) ; see also T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. a rt

. 44.02 (West
2018 )

. We requested that A ppellant respond and show grounds to continue the appeal , but w e have not received a response from Appellant. Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment does not exceed the punishment agreed to in the plea bargain, “a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written mot ion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal , or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2)

. Subsections (A), (B), and (C) are not applicable here. We no te that Rule 25.2 does not permit a plea

- bargaining defendant to appeal matters related to the voluntariness of the plea bargain

—

unless the defendant has obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. See Cooper v. State , 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001);
Carender v. State , 155 S.W.3d 929, 931 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2005, no pet.).
The documents on file in th is appeal reflect that Appellant entered into a plea bargain
, that h is punishment wa s assessed in accordance with the plea bargain , and
that he waived h is right of appeal. T he trial court certified that Appellant has no right of appeal

. Both the plea agreement and t he trial court’s certification w ere signed by Appellant, Appellant ’s trial counsel
, and the judge of the trial court. T he
documents on file in this court sup port the trial court’s certification

. See Dears v.
State , 154 S.W.3d 610 , 613

– 14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Accordingly , we must dismiss t h is appeal without further action. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State
, 183 S.W.3d 6 75, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).3

This appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

Octo ber 16 , 2020 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1
Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
#### § 1272.5 Additional information.

FHFA may request additional information from a Bank necessary to issue a determination regarding an NBA. After an initial request for information, FHFA may make subsequent requests for information only to the extent that the information provided by the Bank does not fully respond to a previous request, the subsequent request seeks information needed to clarify the Bank's previous response, or the information provided by the Bank raises new legal, policy, or supervisory issues not evident based on the Bank's NBA notice or responses to previous requests for information. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall limit the Director's authority to request additional information from a Bank regarding an NBA for which the Director has extended the review period.
#### Matter of Theodore C. Marceau.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

July, 1900.)

1. Crimes — A person cannot kidnap his own child.

Where the return to a writ of habeas corpus, procured by a prisoner arrested for kidnapping a child, does not deny the allegation of the petition that the .petitioner duly obtained a divorce from his wife and was thereupon awarded the custody of the said child, the latter bearing his name, the prisoner must be discharged, as he cannot, under such circumstances, be guilty of kidnapping his own child.

2. Same — Habeas corpus to review legality of detention before indictment found.

Where a warrant is issued before an indictment has been found, the prisoner is entitled to have the legality of his detention passed upon.

Application on habeas corpus for discharge from imprisonment.

Howe *&*Hummel, for petitioner.

Forbes J. Hennessy, Assistant District Attorney, for People.

McAdam, J.

The prisoner was arrested in the city of New York by the chief of police thereof, under a warrant issued by the recorder of the city of Ogdensburg, on the charge of kidnapping. There being no denial by return filed, it must be taken as true, as alleged by the prisoner, that he obtained a divorce from his wife, and was awarded by a competent court the custody of the child, which bears his name and which he is charged with *218kidnapping. It was impossible for the prisoner to be guilty of kidnapping his own child under such circumstances. The warrant was issued before indictment, and the prisoner is, therefore, entitled to have the legality of his detention inquired into and passed upon. Code Civ. Pro., § 2031; People v. Martin, 1 Park. Or. 187, 189; Ex parte Tayloe, 5 Cow. 50, 51; People ex rel. Pickard v. Sheriff, 11 Civ. Pro. 172, 179; 15 Am. *&*Eng. Ency. of Law (2d ed.), § 161. It cannot be that a mere *ex parte*complaint before a magistrate deprives the Supreme Court of its power under the writ of habeas corpus of determining whether the imprisonment of the citizen is justifiable or not, particularly where the warrant is to take him to a place remote from his home or friends. The prisoner committed no crime, and is entitled to his liberty.

Application granted.
### North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator USEPA, Region 4 SamNunn Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

### Division of Air Quality Sheila C. Holman Director November 30, 2012 Dee Freeman Secretary

Subject: Withdrawal ofRequest for Approval ofCertain Rule Amendments DearMs. Fleming: On September 18, 2009 and November9, 2010, the North Carolina Division ofAir Quality submitted amendments to 15A NCAC 02D .0952, Petition for Alternative Controls for RACT, to clarify language (part ofNC-141) and update cross references (part ofNC-154), respectively. Based on discussions with your staff, North Carolina is withdrawing its request for approval ofthese amendments to these rules at this time. Please contactJoelle Burleson ofmy staffat (919) 707-8720 ifyou have any questions regarding this matter.

Enclosures SCH/jbb
c: BeverlyBanister ScottDavis Lynorae Benjamin NacostaWard (hardcopy and CD) MichaelAbraczinskas SushmaMasemore

1641 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 217 West Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603 Phone: 919-707·84011 FAX 919-715-0718 /Internet: www ncatr.org An Equal OpportunttyiAffirmative Action Employer Sincerely,

Sheila C. Holman



# N2JThcarolina 

# ;vaturalllf
08/03/2011 16:52 FAX 2024935142 FAA - DWS 001/003 

DSRARTjyiEf([ OF 

. ^,l;v^ij|y%^cWMj\^'^- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS r:GCKET'(3PERATiONo ^^m . 

m \ AUG -Ll A OFEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

b 

FF.DBRAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

DEAN INTERNATIONAL, INC, 

Respondent. 

-;^A:^;-^G DOC 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-0069 

FAA Case Nos. 2010SO190256, 

2010SO190260 

Judge Sullivan 

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

The FAA has rtcciveJ ResponUenls request to depose six FAA inspectors on August 23-

24, 2011. The undersigned has confirmed that the inspectors are available on the days requested. 

However, while the Notice requests that the depositions be held at Respondent's counsel's office 

in Miami, this would cause undue disruption to FAA operations. As all six requesled deponenis 

work' and are stationed at the South Florida FSDO in Miramar, Florida, they will be made 

available at this location instead. This will permit Respondent full access to the proposed 

deponents, while also eliminating unnecessary interference with the FAA's responsibilities. 

Respondent has not sought agency counsel's prior consent pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 9.7(b). 

However, with this location accommodation, agency counsel consents to the depositions. 

Additionally, the undersigned presumes that, pursuant to § 9.7(b), questions at the 

depositions will be limited to relevant facts of which the deponents have personal knowledge. 

.Agency counsel's consent does not extend beyond such permissible questions. 
08/03/201 1 ie-.52 FAX 2024335142 FAA ^ DMS ©002/00 3 

To the extent that Respondent intends to go beyond the location or subject matter 

limitations set forth above, the FAA objects to the Motices of Deposition. 

M^^^y ^ 

CHRISTOPHER R. STF.VENSON 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

July 29, 2010 
08/03/201 1 16:52 FAX 2024935142 FAA - QMS ©003/00 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

1 hereby certify that the foregoing Response to Notice of Deposition was sent: 

original and one copy via certified mail and Federal Express to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

goo Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wnght Building - Suite 2W1000 

one copy via certified mail and Federal Express to: 

1 he Honorable Jeslyn E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings,'M-20, Room E12-320 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile to: 

Stuart Goldstein, Esq. 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P. A. 

9350 South DLXie Highway, 10th Floor 

Miami, FL.33156 

facsimile (305) 670-7065 

/ GERALD A. JEli/NINGS 

Program Analyst 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

JUL 2 9 Wf
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Salim Jamil Ayyash

# 									Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Salim Jamil Ayyash							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 29, 2021

The U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice program is offering a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to the location or identification of Salim Jamil Ayyash, a senior operative in the assassination unit of the terrorist organization Lebanese Hizballah, or information leading to preventing him from engaging in an act of international terrorism against a U.S. person or U.S. property.

Ayyash is a senior operative in Hizballah’s Unit 121, the group’s assassinations squad which receives its orders directly from Hizballah leader Hasan Nasrallah. Ayyash is known to have been involved in efforts to harm U.S. military personnel.

On December 11, 2020, an international tribunal sentenced Ayyash in absentia to five concurrent sentences of life imprisonment on terrorism-related charges pertaining to the February 2005 suicide truck bombing in Beirut that killed Lebanon’s former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The attack also killed 21 others and wounded 226 persons.

The tribunal found that Ayyash led the ‘assassination team’ that carried out the attack on Hariri and was actively involved in the assassination on the day of the attack.

Ayyash was born November 10, 1963 in Harouf, Lebanon. He has resided in multiple areas of Lebanon including Hadath, Nabatiyyeh, and Beirut’s southern suburbs.

More information about this reward offer is located on the Rewards for Justice website at www.rewardsforjustice.net.  We encourage anyone with information on Salim Jamil Ayyash to text the Rewards for Justice office via Signal, Telegram, or WhatsApp at +1-202-702-7843.  All information will be kept strictly confidential.

The Rewards for Justice Program is an effective law enforcement tool and is administered by the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service.  Since its inception in 1984, the program has paid in excess of $200 million to more than 200 people who provided actionable information that helped bring terrorists to justice or prevented acts of international terrorism worldwide.  Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/RFJ_USA.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsLebanonOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for Justice

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 1282.64 Periodic reports.

Each Enterprise shall provide to the Director such reports, information and data as the Director may request from time to time.
# C_2022066EN.01002601.xml

| 8.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 February 2022

(2022/C 66/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1447 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4483 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0571 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0658 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,222 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 353,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5432 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9461 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,5235 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6097 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9202 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7278 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5389 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 371,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7000 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2807 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 478,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7909 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,978 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,5824 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,735 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0541 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5750 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,5345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1447

JPY

Japanese yen

131,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84685

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4483

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0571

ISK

Iceland króna

143,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0658

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,222

HUF

Hungarian forint

353,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5432

RON

Romanian leu

4,9461

TRY

Turkish lira

15,5235

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6097

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9202

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7278

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5389

KRW

South Korean won

1 371,76

ZAR

South African rand

17,7000

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2807

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 478,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7909

PHP

Philippine peso

58,978

RUB

Russian rouble

86,5824

THB

Thai baht

37,735

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0541

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5750

INR

Indian rupee

85,5345

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Galveston Bay to Cedar Lakes,Texas [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:11322/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000876756
 
ZIP Files: 1974-76 | 1977-82
 
March 3, 2020
# C_2023109EN.01008201.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/82

---

Corrigendum to Public holidays 2023

(

  Official Journal of the European Union C 39 of 1 February 2023

  )

(2023/C 109/08)

On page 20, in the 24th row of the table:

for:

| ‘Slovenija | 2.1, 6.4, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 29.5, 21.7, 31.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Slovenija

2.1, 6.4, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 29.5, 21.7, 31.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12’

read:

| ‘Slovenija | 1.1, 2.1, 8.2, 10.4, 27.4, 1.5, 2.5, 25.6, 15.8, 31.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Slovenija

1.1, 2.1, 8.2, 10.4, 27.4, 1.5, 2.5, 25.6, 15.8, 31.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12’

---
NON-RECOURSE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                ------------------------------------
$102,158.27                                         January 28, 2000


        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Richard S. Dondero (the "Maker")
hereby promises to pay to the order of Cistron Biotechnology,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cistron"), at Cistron's principal
offices at 10 Bloomfield Avenue, Pine Brook, New Jersey 07058,
or such other address as Cistron shall have given to the Maker,
the principal sum of One Hundred Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty-
Eight Dollars and Twenty-Seven Cents ($102,158.27) on the
earliest of January 1, 2002, the merger or sale of Cistron, or
the liquidation or dissolution of Cistron

        Payments shall be made in such currency of the United
States as at the time of payment shall be legal tender for the
payment of public and private debts.

        This Note evidences the Loan made by Cistron under the
Loan and Pledge Agreement dated the date hereof (the
"Agreement") between Cistron and the Maker providing, among
other things, for the securing of the Note by a pledge of the
Shares, for the prepayment of this Note and for the acceleration
of the maturity of this Note following an Event of Default, all
on the terms set forth in the Agreement.

        This Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any
time and from time to time without premium.  This Note shall be
paid without deduction by reason of any set-off, defense or
counterclaim of the Maker.

        Upon any sale of the Shares, this Note shall become
due and payable as set forth in the Agreement.  In addition,
upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the
Agreement), this Note shall become due and payable as set forth
in the Agreement.

        The Maker agrees to pay to the holder hereof all
expenses incurred by such holder, including reasonable
attorneys' fees, in enforcing and collecting this Note.  The
Maker



<PAGE> 2

does not assume any personal liability or responsibility for the
failure to pay the principal amount of this Note.  The sole
remedy available upon such failure shall be to proceed against
the Collateral in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

The Maker hereby forever waives presentment, demand,
presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of
dishonor of this Note and all other demands and notices in
connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance and
enforcement of this Note.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey and shall be
binding upon the heirs or legal representatives of the Maker and
shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of
Cistron.


/s/RICHARD S. DONDERO
--------------------
Richard S. Dondero
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Sanctioning Two State-Owned Banks and the Ministry of Defense for the Burma Military Regime’s Atrocities

# 									Sanctioning Two State-Owned Banks and the Ministry of Defense for the Burma Military Regime’s Atrocities							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 21, 2023

Today, the United States is designating Burma’s Ministry of Defense (MoD) and two of Burma’s largest regime-controlled banks, Myanma Foreign Trade Bank (MFTB) and Myanma Investment and Commercial Bank (MICB).  MFTB and MICB have been instrumental in facilitating the regime’s use of foreign currency to procure arms from abroad for the MoD.  These banks also allow Burma’s revenue-generating state-owned enterprises to easily access international markets using the banks’ offshore accounts, providing significant financial resources for the regime to exploit for military purposes.

The United States will not waver in its support for the people of Burma as they seek peace, justice, and a genuine democratic future for their country.  We will continue to engage with our partners and allies in the broader international community to constrain the regime’s ability to exploit the international financial system to advance its violence and prolong the crisis, while restricting the regime’s ability to transfer hard currency to Russia’s defense sector.

*The designations of**MoD,**MFTB, and**MICB**were taken pursuant to*Executive Order 14014*for being political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities of the military regime.  For more information on today’s Treasury actions, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaThe Secretary of State

Back to Top