Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices 50257 

Ames Research Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. 

Location 3. 

Dryden Flight Research Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, PO 

Box 273, Edwards, CA 93523–0273. 

Location 4. 

Goddard Space Flight Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Greenbelt, MD 20771–0001. 

Location 5. 

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Houston, TX 77058–3696. 

Location 6. 

John F. Kennedy Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899–0001. 

Location 7. 

Langley Research Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Hampton, VA 23681–2199. 

Location 8. 

John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis 

Field, National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, 21000 Brookpark Road, 

Cleveland, OH 44135–3191. 

Location 9. 

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, Marshall Space Flight 

Center, AL 35812–0001. 

Location 10. 

HQ NASA Management Office-JPL, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, 

Pasadena, CA 91109–8099. 

Location 11. 

John C. Stennis Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–6000. 

Location 12. 

JSC White Sands Test Facility, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, P.O. 

Drawer MM, Las Cruces, NM 88004–0020. 

Location 13. 

GRC Plum Brook Station, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Sandusky, OH 44870. 

Location 14. 

MSFC Michoud Assembly Facility, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, P.O. Box 29300, New 

Orleans, LA 70189. 

Location 15. 

NASA Independent Verification and 

Validation Facility (NASA IV&V), 100 

University Drive, Fairmont, WV 26554. 

Location 16. 

New Jersey Post of Duty, 402 East State 

Street, Trenton, NJ 08608. 

Location 17. 

Western Field Office, Glenn Anderson 

Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Blvd., 

Long Beach, CA 90802–4222. 

Location 18. 

NASA Shared Services Center (NSSC), 

Building 5100, Stennis Space Center, MS 

39529–6000. 

Appendix B 

Standard Routine Uses—NASA 

The following routine uses of information 

contained in SORs, subject to the Privacy Act 

of 1974, are standard for many NASA 

systems. They are cited by reference in the 

paragraph ‘‘Routine uses of records 

maintained in the system, including 

categories of users and the purpose of such 

uses’’ of the Federal Register Notice on those 

systems to which they apply. 

Standard Routine Use No. 1—LAW 

ENFORCEMENT—In the event this system of 

records indicates a violation or potential 

violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or 

regulatory in nature, and whether arising by 

general statute or particular program statute, 

or by regulation, rule or order issued 

pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the 

SOR may be referred, as a routine use, to the 

appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, 

local or foreign, charged with the 

responsibility of investigating or prosecuting 

such violation or charged with enforcing or 

implementing the statute, or rule, regulation 

or order issued pursuant thereto. 

Standard Routine Use No. 2— 

DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED 

INFORMATION—A record from this SOR 

may be disclosed as a ‘‘routine use’’ to a 

Federal, State, or local agency maintaining 

civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement 

information or other pertinent information, 

such as current licenses, if necessary to 

obtain information relevant to an agency 

decision concerning the hiring or retention of 

an employee, the issuance of a security 

clearance, the letting of a contract, or the 

issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. 

Standard Routine Use No. 3— 

DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED 

INFORMATION—A record from this SOR 

may be disclosed to a Federal agency, in 

response to its request, in connection with 

the hiring or retention of an employee, the 

issuance of a security clearance, the reporting 

of an investigation of an employee, the letting 

of a contract, or the issuance of a license, 

grant, or other benefit by the requesting 

agency, to the extent that the information is 

relevant and necessary to the requesting 

agency’s decision on the matter. 

Standard Routine Use No. 4— 

DISCLOSURE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE FOR USE IN LITIGATION—It shall 

be a routine use of the records in this system 

of records to disclose them to the Department 

of Justice when (a) the Agency, or any 

component thereof; or (b) any employee of 

the Agency in his or her official capacity; or 

(c) any employee of the Agency in his or her 

individual capacity where the Department of 

Justice or the Agency has agreed to represent 

the employee; or (d) the United States, where 

the Agency determines that litigation is likely 

to affect the Agency or any of its components, 

is a party to litigation or has an interest in 

such litigation, and the use of such records 

by the Department of Justice or the Agency 

is deemed by the Agency to be relevant and 

necessary to the litigation provided, however, 

that in each case it has been determined that 

the disclosure is compatible with the purpose 

for which the records were collected. 

Standard Routine Use 5—ROUTINE USE 

FOR AGENCY DISCLOSURE IN 

LITIGATION—It shall be a routine use of the 

records in this system of records to disclose 

them in a proceeding before a court or 

adjudicative body before which the agency is 

authorized to appear, when: (a) The Agency, 

or any component thereof; or (b) any 

employee of the Agency in his or her official 

capacity; or (c) any employee of the Agency 

in his or her individual capacity where the 

Agency has agreed to represent the employee; 

or (d) the United States, where the Agency 

determines that litigation is likely to affect 

the Agency or any of its components, is a 

party to litigation or has an interest in such 

litigation, and the use of such records by the 

Agency is deemed to be relevant and 

necessary to the litigation, provided, 

however, that in each case, the Agency has 

determined that the disclosure is compatible 

with the purpose for which the records were 

collected. 

Standard Routine Use No. 6—SUSPECTED 

OR CONFIRMED CONFIDENTIALITY 

COMPROMISE—A record from this SOR may 

be disclosed to appropriate agencies, entities, 

and persons when (1) NASA suspects or has 

confirmed that the security or confidentiality 

of information in the system of records has 

been compromised; (2) NASA has 

determined that as a result of the suspected 

or confirmed compromise there is a risk of 

harm to economic or property interests, 

identity theft or fraud, or harm to the security 

or integrity of this system or other systems 

or programs (whether maintained by NASA 

or another agency or entity) that rely upon 

the compromised information; and (3) the 

disclosure made to such agencies, entities, 

and persons is reasonably necessary to assist 

in connection with NASA’s efforts to respond 

to the suspected or confirmed compromise 

and prevent, minimize, or remedy such 

harm. 

[FR Doc. E9–23497 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Advisory Committee for Engineering; 

Notice of Meeting 

In accordance with Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as 

amended), the National Science 

Foundation announces the following 

meeting: 

Name: Engineering Advisory Committee 

Meeting, #1170. 

Date/Time: October 21, 2009: 12:00 p.m. to 

6:15 p.m. October 22, 2009: 8:15 a.m. to 12:15 

p.m. 

Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 

Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, 

Virginia 22230. 

Type of Meeting: Open. 

Contact Person: Deborah Young, National 

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, 

recommendations and counsel on major goals 

and policies pertaining to engineering 

programs and activities. 

Agenda: The principal focus of the meeting 

on both days will be to discuss emerging 

issues and opportunities for the Directorate 

for Engineering and its divisions and review 

Committee of Visitors Reports. 


CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
50258 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices 

Dated: September 25, 2009. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–23544 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 70–152; NRC–2009–0400] 

Notice of License Acceptance of 

Renewal Application for Purdue 

University and Opportunity To Request 

a Hearing; Special Nuclear Materials 

License SNM–142, West Lafayette, IN 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of license renewal 

application and opportunity to request a 

hearing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Adams, Senior Project Manager, 

Fuel Manufacturing Branch, Division of 

Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Rockville, Maryland 

20852. Telephone: (301) 492–3113; Fax: 

(301) 492–3363; e-mail: 

Mary.Adams@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has accepted an 

application for renewal of Special 

Nuclear Material License SNM–142 for 

the continued use of special nuclear 

materials (SNM) for education, research, 

and training programs at Purdue 

University in West Lafayette, Indiana. 

Purdue requested renewal of SNM–142 

for a period of 10 years. This license 

renewal, if approved, would authorize 

Purdue to continue to possess and use 

special nuclear materials under the 

provisions of Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 70, 

Domestic Licensing of SNM. 

II. Discussion 

In an application dated July 31, 2009, 

Purdue requested renewal of SNM–142. 

Following an administrative review, and 

as documented in a letter to Purdue 

University dated August 28, 2009, the 

NRC staff determined that the request 

for renewal contains all essential 

elements and accepted it for technical 

review and docketing. The application 

has been docketed in Docket No. 70– 

152, the existing docket for Special 

Nuclear Materials License SNM–142. In 

accordance with 10 CFR 70.38(a), 

Purdue is permitted to continue using 

the SNM in accordance with existing 

license SNM–142, pending a final 

Commission decision on the renewal 

request. The acceptance letter estimated 

that NRC staff would complete the 

review by September 2010. 

If the NRC approves the renewal 

application, the approval will be 

documented in renewal of NRC License 

SNM–142. However, before approving 

the proposed amendment, the NRC will 

need to make the findings required by 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended (the Act), and the NRC’s 

regulations. These findings will be 

documented in a Safety Evaluation 

Report. Because the licensed material 

will be used for research and 

development and for educational 

purposes, renewal of SNM–142 is an 

action that is categorically excluded 

from the requirement to prepare an 

environmental assessment or 

environmental impact statement, 

pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(c)(14)(v). 

II. Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

The NRC hereby provides notice that 

this is a proceeding on an application 

for the renewal of Special Nuclear 

Material License SNM–142 issued to 

Purdue University in West Lafayette, 

Indiana. Any person whose interest may 

be affected by this proceeding, and who 

desires to participate as a party, must 

file a request for a hearing and a 

specification of the contentions which 

the person seeks to have litigated in the 

hearing, in accordance with the NRC E– 

Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated 

on August 28, 2007 (72 FR 49139). All 

documents filed in NRC adjudicatory 

proceedings, including documents filed 

by interested governmental entities 

participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c) and 

any motion or other document filed in 

the proceeding prior to the submission 

of a request for hearing or petition to 

intervene, must be filed in accordance 

with the E–Filing rule. The E–Filing 

rule requires participants to submit and 

serve all adjudicatory documents over 

the Internet or in some cases to mail 

copies on electronic storage media. 

Participants may not submit paper 

copies of their filings unless they seek 

a waiver in accordance with the 

procedures described below. 

To comply with the procedural 

requirements of E–Filing, at least ten 

(10) days prior to the filing deadline, the 

petitioner/requestor must contact the 

Office of the Secretary by e-mail at 

Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov, or by calling 

(301) 415–1677, to request: (1) A digital 

Identification (ID) certificate, which 

allows the participant (or its counsel or 

representative) to digitally sign 

documents and access the E–Submittal 

server for any proceeding in which it is 

participating; and/or (2) creation of an 

electronic docket for the proceeding 

(even in instances in which the 

petitioner/requestor, or its counsel or 

representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Each 

petitioner/requestor will need to 

download the Workplace Forms 

Viewer TM to access the Electronic 

Information Exchange (EIE), a 

component of the E–Filing system. The 

Workplace Forms Viewer TM is free and 

is available at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

sitehelp/e-submittals/installviewer.html. Information about applying 

for a digital ID certificate is available on 

NRC’s public Web site at http:// 

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ 

applycertificates.html. 

Once a petitioner/requestor has 

obtained a digital ID certificate, had a 

docket created, and downloaded the EIE 

viewer, it can then submit a request for 

hearing or petition for leave to 

intervene. Submissions should be in 

Portable Document Format (PDF) in 

accordance with NRC guidance 

available on the NRC public Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered 

complete at the time the filer submits its 

documents through EIE. To be timely, 

an electronic filing must be submitted to 

the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m., 

Eastern Time on the due date. Upon 

receipt of a transmission, the E–Filing 

system time-stamps the document and 

sends the submitter an e-mail notice 

confirming receipt of the document. The 

EIE system also distributes an e-mail 

notice that provides access to the 

document to the NRC Office of the 

General Counsel and any others who 

have advised the Office of the Secretary 

that they wish to participate in the 

proceeding, so that the filer need not 

serve the documents on those 

participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before a hearing request/ 

petition to intervene is filed so that they 

can obtain access to the document via 

the E–Filing system. 

A person filing electronically may 

seek assistance through the ‘‘Contact 

Us’’ link located on the NRC Web site 

at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html or by calling the NRC 

technical help line, which is available 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding government holidays. The 

toll-free help line number is (800) 672– 

7640. A person filing electronically may 

also seek assistance by sending an 


CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES