alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                                    
                    NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANY
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (a)
                              (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
(thousands, except per share data)               June 30,                June 30,
----------------------------------          -------------------   ------------------
                                             1997        1996      1997       1996
                                            -------     -------   -------   -------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>
Computation of Earnings Per Common 
 and Common Equivalent Share
 Net Income                                 $ 1,217     $ 1,321   $ 1,842   $ 2,153
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
Average Number of Shares of
 Common Stock Outstanding                     6,226       6,140     6,204     6,132
Incremental Effect of
 Unexercised Stock Options                       52          86        63        76
                                            -------     -------   -------   -------
Average Number of Shares of 
 Common Stock and Common Stock
 Equivalents Outstanding                      6,278       6,226     6,267     6,208
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
Earnings per Common and Common
 Equivalent Share                           $  0.19     $  0.21   $  0.29   $  0.35
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
Computation of Earnings Per Common
 Share Assuming Full Dilution
 Net Income                                 $ 1,217     $ 1,321   $ 1,842   $ 2,153
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
Average Number of Shares of
 Common Stock Outstanding                     6,226       6,140     6,204     6,132
Incremental Effect of
 Unexercised Stock Options                       96          91        85        95
                                            -------     -------   -------   -------
Average Number of Shares of
 Common Stock Assuming
 Full Dilution                                6,322       6,231     6,289     6,227
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
Earnings Per Common Share
 Assuming Full Dilution                     $  0.19     $  0.21   $  0.29   $  0.35
                                            =======     =======   =======   =======
(a)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.  Because the incremental effect of unexercised stock options results in dilution
of less than 3%, the per share data presented in the consolidated statement of income
excludes the impact of common stock equivalents.
</TABLE>
                                  E-1
                               Page 9 of 9<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the NHP Retirement  Housing  Partners I Limited
Partnership  Form  10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended  March 31,  2003,  the
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirement of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


                                            /s/ Robert Lankford
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Robert Lankford
                                           Chief executive officer and
                                           Chief financial officer of
                                           the General Partner
                                           May 14, 2003
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-4255

___________

In re: Virginia P. Dale, *

*

Debtor, *

_________________________ *

*

Virginia P. Dale, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

* for the Eighth Circuit.

HomeQ Servicing Corporation; Betty *

Veasey; Ken Thompson; Judy * [UNPUBLISHED]

Brookman; Sandra Rodriguez- *

Villalovoz; Jill Olsen; Michael P. *

Gaughan; Jan Henryck; Kozeny & *

McCubbin, L.C.; Amy Hope Davis, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 28, 2006

Filed: January 11, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jerry W. Venters, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court

for the Western District of Missouri.

2

This name appears as both “HomEq” and “HomeQ” in the record. 

-2-

Chapter 13 debtor, Virginia Dale, appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s1

 judgment in favor of HomEq2

Servicing Corp. (HSC) and numerous others associated with HSC whom Dale sued

in an adversary proceeding to rescind her home mortgage and obtain damages.

Upon careful review of the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that

Dale’s arguments either are not properly before us or fail to assert an adequate basis

for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

JULY, 1900.

#### Francesco Alleva, Appellant, *v.*James J. Hagerty, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

H. Moeller, for appellant.

Stickney, Spencer & Ordway, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The record shows that the judgment dismissing the complaint was rendered at the plaintiff’s request. No appeal *712lies from such a judgment. It is unnecessary to pass upon the question sought to he raised by appellant as to the power of the Municipal Court to stay an action for nonpayment of costs awarded in a former action.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022193EN.01000401.xml

| 12.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 May 2022

(2022/C 193/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0553 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85393 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0446 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1793 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,365 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 379,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6575 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9470 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,1851 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5055 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3685 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2839 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6645 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4622 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9275 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0893 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 308,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6185 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,992 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,492 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3859 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3870 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,4935 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0553

JPY

Japanese yen

137,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85393

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0446

ISK

Iceland króna

139,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1793

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,365

HUF

Hungarian forint

379,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6575

RON

Romanian leu

4,9470

TRY

Turkish lira

16,1851

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5055

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3685

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2839

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6645

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4622

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,99

ZAR

South African rand

16,9275

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0893

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 308,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6185

PHP

Philippine peso

54,992

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,492

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3859

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3870

INR

Indian rupee

81,4935

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2021505EN.01000201.xml

| 15.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 505/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 505/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 December 2021

(2021/C 505/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1309 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85345 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2810 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0404 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,334 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 366,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6300 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9494 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,2092 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5866 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4490 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8227 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6723 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5469 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1219 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1956 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5213 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 179,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7860 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,882 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,1963 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,716 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3723 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,7839 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,8790 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1309

JPY

Japanese yen

128,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85345

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2810

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0404

ISK

Iceland króna

147,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,334

HUF

Hungarian forint

366,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6300

RON

Romanian leu

4,9494

TRY

Turkish lira

16,2092

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5866

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4490

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8227

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6723

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5469

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,31

ZAR

South African rand

18,1219

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1956

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5213

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 179,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7860

PHP

Philippine peso

56,882

RUB

Russian rouble

83,1963

THB

Thai baht

37,716

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3723

MXN

Mexican peso

23,7839

INR

Indian rupee

85,8790

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      Exhibit 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(all amounts except ratios are shown in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                                      ----------------------------------------------
                                                       2005      2004      2003      2002      2001
                                                      ------    ------    ------    -------   ------
<S>                                                   <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
  income taxes and minority interest                  $ 30.9    $162.3    $(42.7)   $(132.5)  $(14.2)

Less:  Equity in earnings of 50%-or-less owned
  companies                                             (3.2)     (4.5)     (1.1)     (0.5)      0.2

Add:  Fixed charges net of capitalized interest         42.9      39.8      41.1      39.7      35.1

Add: Amortization expense of previously capitalized
   interest                                              1.4       1.4       1.3       1.1       0.4
                                                      ------    ------    ------    -------   ------

Total earnings                                          72.0     199.0      (1.4)    (92.2)     21.5

Fixed charges                                           42.9      39.8      41.5      42.3      40.0

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       1.7       5.0       (a)       (a)       (a)
</TABLE>

----------

(a)   - Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $42.9 million, $134.5
      million, and $18.5 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
EXHIBIT 32

                           COGENCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                           Principal Executive Officer

     To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2006, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco
International, Inc. for the periods presented.


August 9, 2006


/s/ David W. Brenman
---------------------------
David W. Brenman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 150.150 Who is responsible for the exercise of fiduciary powers?

The exercise of your fiduciary powers must be managed by or under the direction of your board of directors. In discharging its responsibilities, the board may assign any function related to the exercise of fiduciary powers to any director, officer, employee, or committee of directors, officers, or employees.
Exhibit 12.1
<TABLE>

            Electronic Retailing Systems International, Inc.
            Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                    (Amounts in thousands of dollars)

<CAPTION>
                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                      ----------------------------
                                      1997      1996      1995
                                      ----------------------------
<S>                                   <C>        <C>      <C>
Pre-tax loss from continuing
 operations                           $(26,873)  $(9,412) $(10,868)
                                      --------   -------   -------

Fixed charges:
-------------
Interest expense & amortization         14,024       382       291

Rentals:
  Buildings-33%                            141        93        98
  Office and other leased equipment-33%     13        11        13
                                      --------   -------   --------
Total fixed charges                     14,178       486       402
                                      --------   -------   --------

Earnings before income taxes,
 minority interest and fixed charges   (12,695)   (8,926)  (10,466)
                                      --------   -------   -------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(A)     --        --         --
                                      ========   =======   ========

Deficiency of earnings to fixed
  charges                              $26,873   $ 9,412   $ 10,868
                                      ========   =======   ========



(A)  As a result of losses incurred in the periods presented, the
Company was unable to cover the indicated fixed charges.
</TABLE>
# C_2023055EN.01000201.xml

| 14.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 February 2023

(2023/C 55/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0686 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4485 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88281 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1550 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9849 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 153,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,8213 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,739 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 385,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9031 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,1377 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5388 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4263 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3885 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6846 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4229 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 364,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,1664 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2930 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 278,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6618 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,581 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,177 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5576 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8946 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,3950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0686

JPY

Japanese yen

141,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4485

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88281

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1550

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9849

ISK

Iceland króna

153,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,8213

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,739

HUF

Hungarian forint

385,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7875

RON

Romanian leu

4,9031

TRY

Turkish lira

20,1377

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5388

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4263

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3885

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6846

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4229

KRW

South Korean won

1 364,06

ZAR

South African rand

19,1664

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2930

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 278,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6618

PHP

Philippine peso

58,581

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,177

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5576

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8946

INR

Indian rupee

88,3950

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2675

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat Indian tribes the 

same as State governments for purposes of chapter 35 of such Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2003

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat Indian 

tribes the same as State governments for purposes of 

chapter 35 of such Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Government 

5 Tax Fairness Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DECLARATIONS AND AFFIRMATIONS. 

7 The Congress declares and affirms that: 

8 (1) The United States Constitution, U.S. Fed9 eral Court decisions, and U.S. Statutes recognize 
2

•HR 2675 IH 

1 that Indian tribes are governments, retaining sov2 ereign authority over their lands. 

3 (2) Through treaties, statutes, and executive or4 ders, the United States set aside Indian reservations 

5 to be used as ‘‘permanent homes’’ for Indian Tribes. 

6 (3) As governments, Indian Tribes have the re7 sponsibility and authority to provide governmental 

8 services, develop Tribal economies, and build com9 munity infrastructure to ensure that Indian reserva10 tion lands serve as livable ‘‘permanent homes’’. 

11 (4) Congress is vested with the authority to 

12 regulate commerce with Indian Tribes, and hereby 

13 exercises that authority and affirms the United 

14 States government-to-government relationship with 

15 Indian Tribes. 

16 (5) In enacting the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

17 Act (Public Law 100–497), Congress intended to 

18 treat Indian Tribes as State governments for pur19 poses of chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

20 1986. 

21 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBES AS GOVERNMENTS. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 7871 of 

23 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Indian 

24 tribal governments treated as States for certain purposes) 

25 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6), 
3

•HR 2675 IH 

1 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and 

2 inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the following 

3 new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(8) chapter 35 (relating to taxes on wager5 ing).’’

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to wagers received after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
42209.

#### R. V. WELCH ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

Pannell, Judge.

Section 7 of the Act of 1961 (Ga. L. 1961, pp. 517, 525) as amended by Section 5 of the Act of 1962 (Ga. L. 1962, Sept. Sess.; pp. 37, 46; *Code Ann.*§ 36-1307) establishing an additional method of condemning private property for public road purposes provides: “[w]here there has been an appeal to a jury, and a verdict has been had, the court shall, in instances where no motion for new trial is filed or bill of exceptions taken, within the time provided for by law, or where such verdict has been affirmed by a proper appellate court and the remittitur from such court has been made the judgment of the superior court, enter up judgment in favor of the condemnee and against the condemnor in the amount of such verdict, together with the accrued court costs, which judgment shall be immediately credited with the sum of money deposited by the condemnor with the declaration of taking, and which shall bear interest at the rate of seven per centum per annum upon any increase from the amount so deposited; and, upon the failure or refusal of the condemnor to immediately deposit such increase in such sum into the registry of the court, as well as the accrued court costs, it shall be the duty of said clerk to issue execution therefor.” Where, as in the present case, a verdict of the jury was rendered on November 17, 1964, finding an amount as damages in excess of the original amount estimated and deposited with the court under Section 3 of said Act as amended *(Code Ann.*§ 36-1303) and the trial judge, without waiting the expiration of the time for moving for a new trial, entered a judgment in favor of the condemnee and against the condemnor for the amount of damages found by the jury, and after the filing on December 1, 1964, of the condemnee’s motion for new trial and the amount found by the jury was disbursed to the condemnee and accepted by it, the appeal to this court- from the judgment of November 17, 1964, after the overruling of a motion for new trial presents only moot questions. See *Grizzel v. Grizzel,*190 Ga. 219 (3) (9 SE2d 247); *Allen v. Allen,*198 Ga. 267 (31 SE2d 481). The fact that the judgment entered by the trial judge may have been prematurely entered does not alter the situation, as the condemnee, by accepting the payments thereunder, effectively terminated its *483right to appeal from the judgment. While provision is made for the withdrawal of the estimated amount of damages deposited in the registry of the court upon the filing of the declaration of taking without any penalties being attached, no such provision is made for the condemnee to “draw down” the amount of the final judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury.

Argued September 8, 1966

Decided October 13, 1966.

*Kemp & Watson, John L. Watson, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, E. J. Summerour, Assistant Attorneys General, J. Patrick Ward, John R. McCannon,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*