alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION

                                     between

                               THE BOEING COMPANY

                                       and

                            American Trans Air, Inc.


                   Exhibit A to Purchase Agreement Number 2262



<PAGE>


                             AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION

                            Dated ___________________

                                   relating to

                          BOEING MODEL 737-83N AIRCRAFT


             The Detail Specification is Boeing Detail Specification  D019A001-B
dated as of November  11,  1998.  Such Detail  Specification  will be amended to
incorporate the Options listed herein,  including the effects on  Manufacturer's
Empty Weight (MEW) and Operating  Empty Weight (OEW). As soon as practicable but
in no case later than  delivery of the first  Aircraft,  Boeing will  furnish to
Buyer  copies of the  Detail  Specification,  which  copies  will  reflect  such
Options.  The  Aircraft  Basic Price  reflects  and includes all effects of such
Options,  except such Aircraft Basic Price does not include the price effects of
any Buyer Furnished Equipment or Seller Purchased Equipment.



<PAGE>
#### § 1272.6 Examinations.

Nothing in this part shall limit in any manner the right of FHFA to conduct any examination of any Bank relating to its implementation of an NBA, including pre- or post-implementation safety and soundness examinations, or review of contracts or other agreements between the Bank and any other party.
§ 1234.3 Base risk retention requirement. ( a ) *Base risk retention requirement.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, the sponsor of a securitization transaction (or majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor) shall retain an economic interest in the credit risk of the securitized assets in accordance with any one of §§ 1234.4 through 1234.10. Credit risk in securitized assets required to be retained and held by any person for purposes of compliance with this part, whether a sponsor, an originator, an originator-seller, or a third-party purchaser, except as otherwise provided in this part, may be acquired and held by any of such person's majority-owned affiliates (other than an issuing entity).
( b ) *Multiple sponsors.* If there is more than one sponsor of a securitization transaction, it shall be the responsibility of each sponsor to ensure that at least one of the sponsors of the securitization transaction (or at least one of their majority-owned or wholly-owned affiliates, as applicable) retains an economic interest in the credit risk of the securitized assets in accordance with any one of §§ 1234.4, 1234.5, 1234.8, 1234.9, or 1234.10.
TrilJ~ii~ Bismarck Tribune 

Classified PO BOX 4001 

Advertising LaC:rosse, WI 54602-4001 

.The ----~ ~ Invoice In 51ale 701-250-8218 

F'inCler ~1~ll'VMM Tojl lree 800·472·2273 

"-- / 

US Environmental Protection Agency Customer: 60034295 

Phone; (303) 312-6279 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Mail Code 8P-P3T 

Date: 08/15/2012 

Denver CO 80202·1129 

CREDIT CARD PA YMENT (circle one) 

I 0,1, o.der , ,.~ "''''-

08115112 20606055 'NV 79.56 I Card II: lBl~~ 

~P~d I Exp Date: " . Signature: 

Credit card I/sers: Feu to 70/-223-6584 

CashAml 

---- ---- ---~- --------- -- ------ --------

OOf15/12 OB/I5J12 

Afl'idavit of Public.lion 

Description 

6084391FI Berthold CleWl Air A 

Bismarck Tribune 

PO:NOIice of Interm 

State of North D.ko'- ) SS County of Bur1elgh 

Befo(e me, I Notary Pu!>11c for'M SI.le of North Dakota 

personally appeared -l!.L. who bell1Q duly sworn deposes 

nd layS that he (SM) I. the Clerk olBllmilrdl. Tribune Co 

• tnallhe b on(.) ...... ~madethroughthe " 

day 

sworn 

of 

a b abedlobefOfe Signed 

20 

T4=?\~!4 ~ 

Notary Pub rth Dakota 

GREGORY P ZIEGLER 

Notary Public 

Stale of North Dakota 

My Commission Expires July 22,2015 

Bismarck Tribune 

www blsmarcklrlbune com 

PO BOX 4001 

LaCrosse, WI 54602-4001 

Terms: PAYMENT IS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE 

Clast Code Order AmI 

102.00 79.56 

&i15 _ 608419 

Net AmI Que 

79.56 

79.56
837.5518
**t OFFICE**  OF THE A77ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

**. :**  **. .**  **Dwch 3,**  **1939**
**‘ .**  **. -.**  **. .**  **. .** * ***..**-.t _... -I -.. _ .-. .

.

: -

### .

Zen.L. P. IIeard, ZIaroh 3, 1939,'PaGe3
+ses neeessarg in the proper and lefpl odnduct of his (.ffi38...."

The stetute does r?ot end hero, hut certain fosditions

Or qualifications

upon the exeroiseOS this ro~~or in makin! purchasesare plainly inoerted. The ex- :mses‘COllt3lnplah!d am to be &x!edm~, m-dctemined & nllmod Once coofioxh-?oxennsuln:- nonth. Then :01low3 the E3l;liontion

Sor Zii0Giii0t3 anti :~ymwr of it3 ;?resentation

to end approvalby the CoxnIssloncrs* Court. yurthor,

suoh purohases shall bo made by each offiaor, hen nllowed,only bx recuisitionIn muter providod for
‘ty the county audi%or, it' auy, othernine

by t?leComlssiones* COWt.

By the languageused above, It is evident that theLe&lature intended the official should ooslplg wvith t?le above provisionsas a condition precedentto his be- $0~allowed,as a natter of ri>ht, suob expenses, Their . '~llu.zmoe

o~~only be nodo wham the itaas a& reasonable.‘ . 4 neocssaryand the Comisslonorsl Court is &von discretionary

paver in determiningif such iixms of expense tsv~been inourred and xhether they are reasonab&eand .- ae?essary

as providcd~ln

the above.scotion. It x~ould

appear theri

that any erbiirary~d~srchd of said.oomiitions on the part of a oou$ty ofSiclalwould be at his om risk in demanding payaicnt

for @uchexpenses lnourred.otherwise.

It 19, th&efore, the opinion of this Depart!!ent %xit while certain oauuty officiaLa nay have ohareod to lb?bounty all reasonableeapmses necessary in the proper '-23 lepal ccnduct of their ol'fioes, the conditionsas set fb*h ih Artiale 3099(b) and above.disobssed, must be corn- . :lied rrith befoxe he can, as.a mahte+'oiright., de.amnd that . :he$ be approved and allovled,, sucti belug wlthiu the disc:elionmS the Comnlsaioners~ Court. ra' rama1nTrusting thetthe abtie a&iwersyour inquiry, Veky truly yours

.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODOLFO HERRERA MENA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73671

Agency No. A092-878-235

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Rodolfo Herrera Mena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

DEC 08 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 07-73671

§ 1252. We review de novo whether a particular conviction constitutes an

aggravated felony, Randhawa v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir. 2002),

and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ properly determined that Herrera Mena is removable as an aggravated

felon under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) because his conviction under California

Health & Safety Code § 11351 was for “illicit trafficking in a controlled

substance” as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). See Rendon v. Mukasey, 520

F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir. 2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the

intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”). We

reject Herrera Mena’s contention that the record of conviction was insufficient to

establish that his conviction related to a federally controlled substance. See United

States v. Alvarez, 972 F.2d 1000, 1005-06 (9th Cir. 1992), overruled on other

grounds by Kawashima v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Petitioner’s remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. SC OTT JAM E S, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-10466

D.C . No. 2:11-c r-00208-GEB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Garland E. B urre ll, Jr., Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 18, 2013 ** B e fore : TALLM AN, M . SM ITH, a nd HUR W ITZ, C irc uit Judge s. Sc ott Ja m e s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 80-m onth se nte nc e im

pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a

fe lon in posse ssion of a

fire arm , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 922(g). W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a n d we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED JUN 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Jam e s c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt viola

te d his dueproc e ss rights by re ly ing on he arsay

e vide nc e tha

t la c ke d suffic ie nt indic ia of re lia bility to support an upwa rd a djustm e nt for obstruc tion of justic e unde r U.S.S.G. § 3C 1 .1 a n d a n upwa rd va rian c e . Se e U

n ite d State

s v . Pe tty , 982 F.2d 1365, 1369 (9th C ir. 1993), ame nde d by

992 F.2d 1015 (9th C ir. 1995) (“ Due proc e ss re quire s tha t som e m inim a l indic ia

of re l ia bility a c c om pa ny a he arsay sta te m e nt.” ). W e re vie w the distric t c o urt’ s de t e rm ination of re lia bility for a buse of disc re tion. Se eid. The distric t c o urt did not a

buse its disc re tion in c onc luding tha t the te stim ony

of a spe c ia l a ge nt re la

y ing thesta

te m e nts of disintere ste d unive rsity offic ia ls wa s suffic i e ntly

re lia ble . AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 0 4 6 6 2
§ 1240.204 Measure for spread risk. ( a ) *General requirement* — ( 1 ) *In general.* An Enterprise must calculate its standardized measure for spread risk by following the steps described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. An Enterprise also must calculate an advanced measure for spread risk by following the steps in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) *Measure for spread risk.* An Enterprise must calculate the standardized measure for spread risk, which equals the sum of the spread risk capital requirements of all covered positions using one or more of its internal models except as contemplated by paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section. An Enterprise also must calculate the advanced measure for spread risk, which equals the sum of the spread risk capital requirements of all covered positions calculated using one or more of its internal models.
( b ) *Single point approach* — ( 1 ) *General.* For purposes of the standardized measure for spread risk, the spread risk capital requirement for a covered position that is an RPL, an NPL, a reverse mortgage loan, or a reverse mortgage security is the amount equal to: ( i ) The market value of the covered position; multiplied by
( ii ) The applicable single point shock assumption for the covered position under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) *Applicable single point shock assumption.* The applicable single point shock assumption is: ( i ) 0.0475 for an RPL or an NPL;
( ii ) 0.0160 for a reverse mortgage loan; and
( iii ) 0.0410 for a reverse mortgage security.
( c ) *Spread duration approach* — ( 1 ) *General.* For purposes of the standardized measure for spread risk, the spread risk capital requirement for a covered position that is a multifamily mortgage exposure, a PLS, or an MBS guaranteed by an Enterprise or Ginnie Mae and secured by multifamily mortgage exposures is the amount equal to: ( i ) The market value of the covered position; multiplied by
( ii ) The spread duration of the covered position determined by the Enterprise using one or more of its internal models; multiplied by
( iii ) The applicable spread shock assumption under paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) *Applicable spread shock assumption.* The applicable spread shock is: ( i ) 0.0015 for a multifamily mortgage exposure;
( ii ) 0.0265 for a PLS; and
( iii ) 0.0100 for an MBS guaranteed by an Enterprise or by Ginnie Mae and secured by multifamily mortgage exposures (other than IO securities guaranteed by an Enterprise or Ginnie Mae).
EXHIBIT 21.1

                        SUNGLASS HUT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

            NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                 STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION

Sunglass Hut Corporation                                      Florida
Sunglass Hut Trading Corporation                              Florida
Sunglass Hut of Canada, Ltd.                              Ontario, Canada
Sunglass Hut of Puerto Rico, Inc.                           Puerto Rico
Sunglass Hut of Virgin Islands, Inc.                     US Virgin Islands
Sunglass Hut Realty Corporation                               Florida
Sunglass Hut of Florida, Inc.                                 Florida
Sunglass Hut (UK) Limited                                 United Kingdom
Sunglass Hut Ireland Limited                                  Ireland
Sunglass Hut Netherlands B.V.                               Netherlands
Sunglass Hut Finance B.V.                                   Netherlands
Sunglass Hut Belgium N.V.                                     Belgium
Sunglass Hut Italy S.R.L.                                      Italy
Sunglass Hut de Mexico, S.A de C.V.                           Mexico
Distribuidora Mexicana de Articulos Para Sol S.A de C.V.      Mexico
Sunglass Hut Holdings of France, Inc.                         Florida
Sunglass Hut of Northern France, Inc.                         Florida
Sunglass Hut of Southern France, Inc.                         Florida
Sunglass Hut of France, SNC                                   France
Sunglass Hut Australia PTY Limited                           Australia
Sunglass World Holdings PTY Limited                          Australia
Sunglass Hut Sweden AB                                        Sweden
Sunglass Hut Portugal, Comercio de Oculos, Lda.              Portugal
Sunglass Hut Germany GMBH                                     Germany
Sunglass Hut Spain SL                                          Spain
Watch Station, Inc.                                           Florida
Shadescom, Inc                                                Florida
Sunglass Hut (Sint Maarten) N.V.                        Netherland Antilles
Sunglass Hut (Antigua) Limited                                Antigua
Sunglass Hut New Zealand PTY Ltd.                           New Zealand
Sunglass Hut (Barbados) Inc.                                 Barbados
Sunglass Hut (South East Asia) PTE Ltd.                      Singapore
# C_2022192EN.01009001.xml

| 11.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/90

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 May 2022

(2022/C 192/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0554 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85595 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6075 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0479 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,014 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 380,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9458 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,0883 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5162 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3707 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2847 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6707 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4667 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0050 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0967 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 349,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6248 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,289 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,448 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4232 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4716 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,5425 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0554

JPY

Japanese yen

137,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85595

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6075

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0479

ISK

Iceland króna

139,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,014

HUF

Hungarian forint

380,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6763

RON

Romanian leu

4,9458

TRY

Turkish lira

16,0883

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5162

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3707

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2847

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6707

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4667

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,56

ZAR

South African rand

17,0050

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0967

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 349,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6248

PHP

Philippine peso

55,289

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,448

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4232

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4716

INR

Indian rupee

81,5425

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2022390EN.01000101.xml

| 11.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 October 2022

(2022/C 390/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9697 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87730 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9502 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9680 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3378 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,521 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 428,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8655 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9400 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0131 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5360 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3312 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,6120 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7369 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3939 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 384,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5866 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9344 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5280 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 872,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5091 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,197 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,810 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0328 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,3588 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9678 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9697

JPY

Japanese yen

141,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87730

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9502

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9680

ISK

Iceland króna

139,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3378

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,521

HUF

Hungarian forint

428,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8655

RON

Romanian leu

4,9400

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0131

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5360

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3312

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,6120

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7369

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3939

KRW

South Korean won

1 384,26

ZAR

South African rand

17,5866

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9344

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5280

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 872,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5091

PHP

Philippine peso

57,197

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,810

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0328

MXN

Mexican peso

19,3588

INR

Indian rupee

79,9678

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 128.4 Nondiscriminatory advertising.

No savings association may directly or indirectly engage in any form of advertising that implies or suggests a policy of discrimination or exclusion in violation of title VIII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1968, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, or this part 128. Advertisements for any loan for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing, or maintaining a dwelling or any loan secured by a dwelling shall include a facsimile of the following logotype and legend:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER09AU11.000/ER09AU11.000_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER09AU11.000/ER09AU11.000_original_size.png)
PROMISSORY NOTE

$150,000                                                 Yorba Linda, California
                                                       Dated as of April 1, 1997


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, MICHAEL T. FIORE, promises to pay to
the order of GMS DENTAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), the
principal sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000), with interest
from the date hereof on the unpaid principal at the rate of 6.84%, compounded
annually. The entire unpaid balance of principal and interest shall be payable
on March 31, 2001.

     If payment is not made when due, and if action is instituted on this note,
the undersigned agrees to pay the Company reasonable attorney's fees and costs
of suit, as fixed by court.

     The undersigned shall have the right to prepare all or any part of the
unpaid principal amount of this note, without premium, at any time prior to the
maturity hereof on ten (10) days' prior written notice.

This Promissory Note is a full-recourse note originally secured by a pledge of
750,000 shares of Common Stock on the Company pursuant to a Security Agreement
of even date herewith, which is on file with the Secretary of the Company.

     This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of California.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed, dated and delivered
thisnote as of the date and year first above written.


                                       MICHAEL T. FIORE
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Michael T. Fiore
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of IR  BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the three  months  ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Michael Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                              /S/ Michael Wilhelm
                              -----------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              May 23, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.