alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
September 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60098 Summary Calendar

VILMA REYES BUSTILLO,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A77 134 333

-------------------- Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Vilma Reyes Bustillo , a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ affirmance of the immigra tion judge’s denial of her

applications for political asylum and withholding of deportation.

Bustillo argues that t he evidence was sufficient to support a

finding of past persecution and a well-founded fear of persecution

based on her political affiliation.2

When, as in this case, the Board of Immigration Appeals adopts

without opinion the immig ration judge’s decision, this court

reviews the immigration judge’s decision. M ikhael v. INS , 115

F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Here, the immigration judge’s

determination that Bustillo had not shown past persecut ion or a

well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to El Salvador

was supported by substantial evidence. S ee Efe v. Ashcroft
, 293

F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002); Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d

194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Bustillo’s petition for review is

DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boundless Motor Sports
Racing, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul Kruger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

/s/ Paul Kruger
    Paul Kruger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boundless Motor Sports
Racing, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Roy Mers, Chief Financial Officer the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

/s/ Roy Mers
    Roy Mers, Chief Financial Officer
§ 1005.16 Disclosures at automated teller machines. ( a ) *Definition.* “Automated teller machine operator” means any person that operates an automated teller machine at which a consumer initiates an electronic fund transfer or a balance inquiry and that does not hold the account to or from which the transfer is made, or about which an inquiry is made.
( b ) *General.* An automated teller machine operator that imposes a fee on a consumer for initiating an electronic fund transfer or a balance inquiry must provide a notice that a fee will be imposed for providing electronic fund transfer services or a balance inquiry that discloses the amount of the fee.
( c ) *Notice requirement.* An automated teller machine operator must provide the notice required by paragraph (b) of this section either by showing it on the screen of the automated teller machine or by providing it on paper, before the consumer is committed to paying a fee.
( d ) *Imposition of fee.* An automated teller machine operator may impose a fee on a consumer for initiating an electronic fund transfer or a balance inquiry only if: ( 1 ) The consumer is provided the notice required under paragraph (c) of this section, and
( 2 ) The consumer elects to continue the transaction or inquiry after receiving such notice.
[76 FR 81023, Dec. 27, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 18224, Mar. 26, 2013]
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Liberia

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Liberia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing the enacted budget within a reasonable period and by ensuring actual revenues and expenditures reasonably corresponded to those in the enacted budget.  However, it did not make its executive budget proposal or its end-of-year report publicly available in a reasonable period.  Information on debt obligations, except state-owned enterprise debt, was widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period.  The government specified in law or the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses, but there are reports of corruption and inconsistent application of regulations in practice.  Basic information on some natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Liberia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Making the executive budget proposal and end-of-year report publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Making state-owned enterprise debt information publicly available;
- Ensuring off-budget accounts are subject to adequate audit and oversight;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- Making supreme audit institution audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Ensuring the laws or regulations for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses are followed in practice; and
- Making basic information on all natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentLiberia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2017

a1023 

# Order

Clerk October 31, 2017

152470

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152470

COA: 321573

Wayne CC: 10

- 006933

- FC

JAMES ANTHONY TERRELL,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 25, 2016, the application for leave to appeal the September 29,

2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in

People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946

- 8). On order of the Court, the cases having been deci ded on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich 453

(2017), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.30 5(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that

remands this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for proceedings under People v Lockridge

, 498 Mich 358 (2015). As the parties agree, the Court of Appeals erroneously concluded

that relief is warranted under Lockridge even where the defendant’s guidelines range was

not enhanced by judicial fact

- finding. See Lockridge , 498 Mich at 394

- 395. In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining

aspects of the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
§ 1240.100 Purpose, applicability, and principle of conservatism. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart establishes: ( 1 ) Minimum requirements for using Enterprise-specific internal risk measurement and management processes for calculating risk-based capital requirements; and
( 2 ) Methodologies for the Enterprises to calculate their advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets.
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) This subpart applies to each Enterprise.
( 2 ) An Enterprise must also include in its calculation of advanced credit risk-weighted assets under this subpart all covered positions, as defined in subpart F of this part.
( c ) *Principle of conservatism.* Notwithstanding the requirements of this subpart, an Enterprise may choose not to apply a provision of this subpart to one or more exposures provided that: ( 1 ) The Enterprise can demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of FHFA that not applying the provision would, in all circumstances, unambiguously generate a risk-based capital requirement for each such exposure greater than that which would otherwise be required under this subpart;
( 2 ) The Enterprise appropriately manages the risk of each such exposure;
( 3 ) The Enterprise notifies FHFA in writing prior to applying this principle to each such exposure; and
( 4 ) The exposures to which the Enterprise applies this principle are not, in the aggregate, material to the Enterprise.
# C_2022121EN.01000301.xml

| 16.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 March 2022

(2022/C 121/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0991 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4410 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84053 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0322 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 144,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8490 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,867 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 371,41 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7355 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9482 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,0968 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5234 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4099 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6026 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6216 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 366,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6249 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0117 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 710,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6239 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,536 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,842 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6385 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9352 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0991

JPY

Japanese yen

129,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4410

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84053

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0322

ISK

Iceland króna

144,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8490

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,867

HUF

Hungarian forint

371,41

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7355

RON

Romanian leu

4,9482

TRY

Turkish lira

16,0968

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5234

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4099

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6026

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6216

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4993

KRW

South Korean won

1 366,05

ZAR

South African rand

16,6249

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0117

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 710,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6239

PHP

Philippine peso

57,536

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,842

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6385

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9352

INR

Indian rupee

83,9555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### §§ 1209.39-1209.49 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2563 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2563

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott 
                         Nisely Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2007

  Mr. Latham (for himself, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. 
  Boswell, and Mr. Loebsack) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott 
                         Nisely Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR SCOTT NISELY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Scott Nisely Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Scott Nisely Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          44,088
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             211
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,056
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    181,872
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         130,074
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           134,711
<LOANS>                                      1,255,410
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,684,668
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,379,387
<SHORT-TERM>                                    62,020
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,615
<LONG-TERM>                                     69,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                         9,923    
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,684,668
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,168
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,445
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   517
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                33,130
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,991
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,615
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,515
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      692
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,024
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,024
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,785
<LOANS-PAST>                                       800
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,090
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      639
<RECOVERIES>                                       104
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,841
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,841
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE 1997 ACQUISITIONS OF WISCONSIN BAN CORP AND CITIZENS
NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### George S. Goodwin, Respondent, *v.*William T. Washburn et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York after a trial of the issues before a jury.

Mayo W. Hazeltine, for appellants.

Holland, Trenholm *&*Whealton (Frank Trenholm, of counsel), ¡for respondent.

*770Conlan, J.

The action is for labor and services, and for materials furnished; it is admitted that the work was done and the materials furnished, but the distinct defense is that the liability was not one for the defendants individually, but was against the executors of one Benjamin Richardson, deceased. This issue was distinctly presented to the jury upon all the evidence, and no exception was taken by the defendants to the whole or any part of the charge. With the province of the jury in determining disputed questions of fact the court on appeal is not inclined to interfere, unless it distinctly appears that the result was reached. through prejudice or undue influence or willful disregard of the evidence adduced on the trial, and as no such element appears by the record, we think the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons Ch. J., and Hascall, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# C_2022057EN.01000101.xml

| 3.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 February 2022

(2022/C 57/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1323 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4383 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3850 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0399 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9228 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,298 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 354,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5449 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,3011 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5828 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4330 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8245 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7010 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5254 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 359,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3459 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2026 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5260 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 243,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7392 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,785 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,8150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,575 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9677 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2134 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6130 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1323

JPY

Japanese yen

129,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4383

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83395

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3850

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0399

ISK

Iceland króna

143,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9228

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,298

HUF

Hungarian forint

354,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5449

RON

Romanian leu

4,9463

TRY

Turkish lira

15,3011

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5828

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4330

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8245

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7010

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5254

KRW

South Korean won

1 359,23

ZAR

South African rand

17,3459

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2026

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5260

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 243,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7392

PHP

Philippine peso

57,785

RUB

Russian rouble

85,8150

THB

Thai baht

37,575

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9677

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2134

INR

Indian rupee

84,6130

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Retrofit to Amersham 660Posilock radiography camera to correct inconsistency in 10 CFR Part 34compatibility**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/96-53

Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000774311
 
Notice | SupplementNo. 1
 
April 6, 2020