alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                820,795
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                         317,353
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                                13,465,776   <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,537,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        11,661,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 209,085
<BONDS>                               8,799,103    <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              2,653,357    <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          11,661,545
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      628,407       <F4>
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         312,982       <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    216,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          98,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASA International Ltd.
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terrence C. McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Terrence C. McCarthy
------------------------
Terrence C. McCarthy
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  September 30, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice of a decrease of the maximum amount for Small Project Grants to State and local governments and private nonprofit facilities for disasters declared on or after October 1, 2009.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 1, 2009, and applies to major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James A. Walke, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207, prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum grant amount made under section 422, Small Project Grants, Simplified Procedure, relating to the Public Assistance program, to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice of a decrease of the maximum amount of any Small Project Grant made to the State, local government, or to the owner or operator of an eligible private nonprofit facility, under section 422 of the Stafford Act, to $63,200 for all disasters declared on or after October 1, 2009.

FEMA bases the adjustment on a decrease in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.5 percent for the 12-month period ended in August 2009. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on September 16, 2009.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public Assistance Grants.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-24069 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
# C_2006045EN.01001601.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 1 July 2005

in Case E-10/04 Paolo Piazza and Paul Schurte AG

(Admissibility — security for costs before national courts — free movement of capital — freedom to provide services)

(Admissibility — security for costs before national courts — free movement of capital — freedom to provide services)

(2006/C 45/12)

In Case E-10/04 between Paolo Piazza and Paul Schurte AG — REQUEST to the Court by Fürstliches Landgericht (Princely Court of Justice), concerning free movement of services and capital within the EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Tresselt and Thorgeir Örlygsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 1 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Fürstliches Landgericht

A national provision, which excludes all means of security for costs in court proceedings, originating in other Contracting Parties, violates Article 40 EEA and cannot be justified on grounds of public policy in order to ensure the good functioning of the civil justice system.

---
exhibit_4-12.htm











Exhibit 4.12


 



	  	  
	    	
Office Online


Agreement


	  	  





 


English (US)


 



	
Agreement Date : December 04, 2013

	
Reference No : 5225950







 




	
Business Center Details


	
CA, Walnut Creek - Downtown


	
Address

	
2121 North California Blvd.


	  	
Suite 290


	  	
Walnut Creek


	  	
California


	  	
94596


	  	
United States of America


	
Sales Manager

	
Jaime Bishop
















	
Client Details

	  
	
Company Name

	
Medigus


	
Contact Name

	
Chris Rowland


	
Address

	
Building 7A Omer Industrial Park


	  	
PO BOx 3030


	  	
Omar


	  	
8496500


	  	
Israel


	
Phone

	
5089041164


	
Email

	
chris.rowland@medigus.com







 







	
Office Payment Details (exc. tax and exc. services)


	
Office Number

	
Number of people

	
Price per Office


	
200

	
1

	
$1,609.00

	  
	
204

	
1

	
$2,059.00

	  











	
Initial Payment :

	
First month’s fee :

	
$3,668.00

	  
	  	
Service Retainer :

	
$7,336.00

	  
	  	
Total Initial Payment :

	
$11,004.00

	  











	
Service Provision :

	
Start Date

	
January 01, 2014

	
End Date

	
June 30, 2014







 


All agreements end on the last calendar day of the month.


 


Comments:


 


* Office Set Up Fees Waived - Total Savings of $ 150.00


Customer is not required to pay the standard set up fee for their office(s).


* Service Bundle Set Up Fees Waived - Total Savings of $ 316.00


Customer is not required to pay the standard activation fees for phone and internet.






  





  











  







	 	Terms and Conditions	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	We are Regus Management Group, LLC, “Regus”. This Agreement incorporates our terms of business set out on our Terms and Conditions which you confirm you have read and understood. We both agree to comply with those terms and our obligations as set out in them. This agreement is binding from the agreement date and may not be terminated once it is made, except in accordance with its terms. Note that the Agreement does not come to an end automatically. See “Bringing your Agreement to an end”.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	I accept the terms and conditions	 	Download Regus terms and conditions	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	We would like to keep you informed of the latest product news, special offers and other marketing information from Regus and its preferred partners. If you would like to receive this information then select this box.	 






	 





 



	 	Confirm by typing your name in the box below	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Name :	 	on behalf of Medigus	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	I confirm these details are correct to the best of my knowledge	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 		Regus.com is secure. Your personal details are protected at all times.	 	  	   Print Agreement	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






	 
	    Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Regus Locations
	 
	           
	 
	
Copyright © 2009 Regus plc. All rights reserved.


Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Regus plc is prohibited.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED AN TONIO DALEY , A ppellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 22

- 643 LT Cas e No. 2021- DR

- 003838

ELAINE S CHIMMING D ALEY ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed August 16, 2022 Non f inal Appeal from the Circuit C ourt for Seminole County , Christopher Sprysenski , J udge. Wayne C. Golding, Sr., of T he Golding Law G roup, P LC

. , O rlando, for Appellant. Mark S

. T roum, o f The T roum La w Firm, P .A. , M aitland, for A ppellee.
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C .J., EVANDER an d WALLIS, JJ. , concur.
§ 1271.6 Pricing of services. ( a ) *General.* Banks shall charge for services authorized in this subpart in a manner consistent with the principles of section 11A(c) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248a(c)), as interpreted by this subpart.
( b ) *Payment instrument account services.* ( 1 ) In determining the fees for services provided under this subpart, a Bank must take into account all direct and indirect costs of providing the services.
( 2 ) Prices must reflect the imputed rate of return that would have been earned and the taxes that would have been paid if the Bank were a private corporation, by using a cost of capital adjustment factor applied to those assets used in providing services authorized under this subpart.
( c ) *Review and publication.* For any year during which any Bank actually provides services authorized by this subpart: ( 1 ) FHFA shall from time to time and at least annually review the cost of capital adjustment factor and review prices for services authorized in this subpart for compliance with the principles set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and
( 2 ) FHFA shall annually publish in the Federal Register all prices for Bank services authorized in this subpart except those for fees charged to an applicant for draws made by a beneficiary under a standby letter of credit.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00073-CR

Charles Lee Hodges

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1181223D)

December 18, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
# OW

J~~ .~EOsrq~s 

## 2~Ay~ O Z v~

O .101 ~~rqt PHOS UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D

.C. 20460 January 15, 2010 Andrew S. Hartten Project Director DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Barley Mill Plaza - Bldg. 19 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 

### Attn: Memorandum

of Understandin OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXICSUBSTANCES 

# 2010 JAN 19 between the U

.S. Environmental Protection g 

### the public ency (EPA) and E. L DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for a Perfluorooctanoic A 

### of the need for an extension Acid PFOA) EPA notification of the Company and Dear Mr . Hartten:

additional 30 This letter is submitted pursuant to Sections V .E.2.m of the above-identified MOUwhich provides for EPAto request an extension to review the Response to Peer Consultation Panel Input and Outline of Phase III Work Plan Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding Between US EPA and DuPont Company dated December 18, 2009. The DuPont Response was received in my office December 18, 2009 . The MOUprovides 30 days for EPA to provide input days to complete its review . Thus we will on the Response. EPAwill need an provide our input to you no later than February 18, 2010 . Sincerely,

cc: EPA Docket ID No. : OPPT-2004-0113 Cathy Fehrenbacher - Mail Code 7406M Lawrence Libelo - Mail Code 7406M David W . Boothe E. I . du Pont de Nemours and Company 4417 Lancaster Pike, CRP 708/110 Wilmington, DE 19805 Chemical Control Division (7405M) JimWillis, Director 

# JAN 15 2010

Internet with Oil Address (URL) " http://www .epa .gov Recycled/Recyclable . Printed Vegetable Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum25% Postconsumer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 50911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23915]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 50911]]

                Executive Order 13512 of September 29, 2009

                
Amending Executive Order 13390

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 
                U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), and in order to extend the work 
                of the Coordinator of Federal Support for the Recovery 
                and Rebuilding of the Gulf Coast Region, Executive 
                Order 13390 of November 1, 2005, as amended, is further 
                amended by striking ``September 30, 2009,'' and 
                inserting in lieu thereof ``April 1, 2010.''
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 29, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-23915
Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2021 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on April 21, 2021 and ending on February 28, 2022 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 27th day of May, 2022.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
Section 302 Officer Certification

I, Tiberio Dall'Olio, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Madeco;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cost such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure control and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

6.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 29, 2005

/s/Tiberio Dall'Olio
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. 

### FAA

## 2_o l<-/-N.M- 

# :< 2 

## 7- 4.]) Directorate Identifier: 

### -AD {/you make changes 

### to zhe values in rile toh!t: hdow. you must 

### t:n.wre the 

### lotal' update accordingly If they do not, click 

### (or Tub) 

### i11to a11d then out ofrhe**cha~·l-'-g'-e_d_c _·** **'l_l.**

### ________________ ___. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per 

### Product (e.g ., aircraft, engine , {e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access , testing, (@$85 /h parts) 

### Registered and close-up)

_ our) 

### Products Midspar Life Limit I 

# (tQw Program 

### & ' 

# $1p,loo**~tt** 

# ..**~** 500.0 Oven.ving Support ' _ 

### _, 

# b.f

_ -{_;1

# ~'L-1 Fitting Inspection 

# ·ejta.

' f}**~** it l 

### /'Y.i'Jc:, 

## 1-lf I a 

## flb

., ' ; 

## t/ :

'• < i

" ,.·,1 l 

## ••

1f \

., ,, .. ., <i**~ ~**  :) ' .fH.: 

# . '.'**'~** ' c 

### r**~·~~,** : l. ' \. i'' 

### ' . ( 

### ' 

## ' I; ,, C{i ., ; • 1: 

# ____ . 

# ___ s i·

_ ui tl ()> f ;**~ ~**  { d '.**~** l l }{' 

### '**~** ' L t:f ' 

### ' ' L ·,:

. ' \, 

## ·' •<' '• " ') 

### U.< (


## ,. \'i)!• '. .,
The known number of**E.t.:Od~<:.~i!l** comp!L<_tl]CC:

.. 

### --·------- Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $577,500 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $



### On-Condition Costs: • Action Work-hours Labor co st Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include acces s, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup) ' 

### ., ;**~** 0! ·. 'I 

## ·. 1 

## ' 1 

## : '· 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might 

### not be obvious

. 

### This .field can also be used to e .:rplain warranty costs): 

# I**~**

### Executive Order 12866: t1f:ih 

### Could the AD be considered a "significant rcgulatOI)'**action'"?~** 

### *Explanation: DOT 

### Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? ., *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: YES* 

# 0 NO 

# fZJ

YES* 

# D NO 

# fZI

Will the AD have a 

### significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer.**~** YES 

# D NO 

# fZI Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is 

### it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

# fZI *Explanation :
PUBLIC LAW 112–136—JUNE 21, 2012 126 STAT. 385 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5890: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

June 5, considered and passed House. 

June 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–136 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To correct a technical error in Public Law 112–122. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

Section 24 of Public Law 112–122 is amended by striking 

‘‘4 of Public Law 109–438’’ and inserting ‘‘1(c) of Public Law 103– 

428’’. 

Approved June 21, 2012. 

Ante, p. 364. 

June 21, 2012 

[H.R. 5890] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAWS