alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 15a0613n.06

No. 14-5666

UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ODELL ANDRE HOLDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE WESTERN 

DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, CLAY, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This case returns from the Supreme Court on remand for 

further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), in which the 

Supreme Court held that the Armed Career Criminal Act’s (ACCA) residual clause was void for 

vagueness. 135 S. Ct. at 2564. Odell Holder was sentenced as an armed career criminal on 

account of his previous convictions for violent felonies. One of Holder’s convictions was for 

evading arrest, a crime which qualified as a violent felony only under the ACCA’s nowinvalidated residual clause. Because the district court relied on this conviction as one of the 

three convictions necessary to trigger the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence, Holder must 

be resentenced because he has shown the elements of plain error. Plain error review applies 

because Holder did not bring a vagueness challenge against the residual clause in the district 

court. See United States v. Milan, 398 F.3d 445, 450–54 (6th Cir. 2005). It is plain that Holder’s 
No. 14-5666

United States of America v. Holder

-2-

evading arrest conviction is no longer a violent felony under the ACCA. Even though the district 

court correctly applied the law at the time of sentencing, “it is enough that an error be ‘plain’ at 

the time of appellate consideration.” Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 (1997). The 

erroneous application of the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence to Holder affected Holder’s 

substantial rights and was an error that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, and public 

reputation of judicial proceedings. Accordingly, we vacate Holder’s sentence and remand his 

case for resentencing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7689

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT G. WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-113-R, CA-98-649-R) Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert G. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wright , Nos. CR-89- 113-R; CA-98-649-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6264
JOHN E. WALSH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B altimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95- 2421-MJG) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John E. Walsh, Appellant Pro Se. Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Walsh v. Smith , No.CA-95-2421-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1806.500 Award Agreement; sanctions. ( a ) *General.* After the CDFI Fund selects a Recipient, the CDFI Fund and the Recipient will enter into an Award Agreement. In addition to the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, the Award Agreement will require that the Recipient: ( 1 ) Must carry out its Eligible Activities in accordance with applicable law, the approved BEA Program application, and all other applicable requirements;
( 2 ) Must comply with such other terms and conditions that the CDFI Fund may establish;
( 3 ) Will not receive any BEA Program Award payment until the CDFI Fund has determined that the Recipient has fulfilled all applicable requirements;
( 4 ) Must comply with performance goals that have been established by the CDFI Fund. Such performance goals will include measures that require the Recipient to use its BEA Program Award funds for Eligible Activities; and
( 5 ) Must comply with all data collection and reporting requirements. Each Recipient must submit to the CDFI Fund such information and documentation that will permit the CDFI Fund to review the Recipient's progress in satisfying the terms and conditions of its Award Agreement, including: ( i ) *Annual report.* Each Recipient shall submit to the CDFI Fund at least annually and within 90 days after the end of each year of the Recipient's performance period, an annual report that will provide data that, among other things, demonstrates the Recipient's compliance with its performance goals (including a description of any noncompliance), its uses of the BEA Program Award funds, and the impact of the BEA Program and the CDFI industry. Recipients are responsible for the timely and complete submission of the annual report.
( ii ) *Financial statement.* A Recipient is not required to submit its financial statement to the CDFI Fund. The CDFI Fund may obtain the necessary information from publicly available sources.
( b ) *Sanctions.* In the event of any fraud, misrepresentation, or noncompliance with the terms of the Award Agreement by the Recipient, the CDFI Fund may terminate, reduce, or recapture the award, bar the Recipient and/or its Affiliates from applying for an award from the CDFI Fund for a period to be decided by the CDFI Fund in its sole discretion, and pursue any other available legal remedies.
( c ) *Compliance with other CDFI Fund awards.* In the event that an Applicant, Recipient, or its Subsidiary or Affiliate is not in compliance, as determined by the CDFI Fund, with the terms and conditions of any CDFI Fund award, the CDFI Fund may, in its sole discretion, bar said Applicant or Recipient from applying for future BEA Program Awards or withhold payment (either initial or subsequent) of BEA Program Award funds.
( d ) *Notice.* Prior to imposing any sanctions pursuant to this section or an Award Agreement, the CDFI Fund will provide the Recipient with written notice of the proposed sanction and an opportunity to respond. Nothing in this section, however, will provide a Recipient with the right to any formal or informal hearing or comparable proceeding not otherwise required by law.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50804-50805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    Date: November 19-20, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, NIH, Johns Hopkins Bayview Campus, Baltimore, MD 21223.
    Contact Person: Stephen J. Heishman, PhD, Research Psychologist, 
Clinical

[[Page 50805]]

Pharmacology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute 
on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 5500 Nathan 
Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, (410) 550-1547.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23602 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 1282.41 Housing plans. ( a ) *General.* If the Director determines that an Enterprise did not comply with, or there is a substantial probability that an Enterprise will not comply with, the duty to serve a particular underserved market in a given year, the Director may require the Enterprise to submit a housing plan for approval by the Director.
( b ) *Nature of housing plan.* If the Director requires a housing plan, the housing plan must: ( 1 ) Be feasible;
( 2 ) Be sufficiently specific to enable the Director to monitor compliance periodically;
( 3 ) Describe the specific actions that the Enterprise will take: ( i ) To comply with the duty to serve a particular underserved market for the next calendar year; or
( ii ) To make such improvements and changes in its operations as are reasonable in the remainder of the year, if the Director determines that there is a substantial probability that the Enterprise will fail to comply with the duty to serve a particular underserved market in such year; and
( 4 ) Address any additional matters relevant to the housing plan as required, in writing, by the Director.
( c ) *Deadline for submission.* The Enterprise must submit the housing plan to the Director within 45 days after issuance of a notice requiring the Enterprise to submit a housing plan. The Director may extend the deadline for submission of a housing plan, in writing and for a time certain, to the extent the Director determines an extension is necessary.
( d ) *Review of housing plans.* The Director will review and approve or disapprove housing plans in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 4566(c)(4) and (c)(5).
( e ) *Resubmission.* If the Director disapproves an initial housing plan submitted by an Enterprise, the Enterprise must submit an amended housing plan acceptable to the Director not later than 15 days after the Director's disapproval of the initial housing plan. The Director may extend the deadline if the Director determines that an extension is in the public interest. If the amended housing plan is not acceptable to the Director, the Director may afford the Enterprise 15 days to submit a new housing plan.
§ 1805.302 Restrictions on use of assistance. ( a ) A Recipient shall use assistance provided by the CDFI Fund and its corresponding matching funds only for the eligible activities approved by the CDFI Fund and described in the Assistance Agreement.
( b ) A Recipient may not distribute assistance to an Affiliate without the CDFI Fund's consent.
( c ) Assistance provided upon approval of an application involving a Community Partnership shall only be distributed to the Recipient and shall not be used to fund any activities carried out by a Community Partner or an Affiliate of a Community Partner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 02, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-1999
<CASH>                                             674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                       583
<INVENTORY>                                        633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,058
<PP&E>                                         135,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,851
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,559
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (225)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA-2014-0486
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                           9,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,503
<PP&E>                                         207,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           427
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,503
<SALES>                                        635,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               635,603
<CGS>                                          368,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  368,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                     738
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2654 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, as the ‘‘Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2007 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN (for herself and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, 

South Dakota, as the ‘‘Eleanor McGovern Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELEANOR MCGOVERN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 202 South Dumont Avenue in 

6 Woonsocket, South Dakota, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2654 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Eleanor McGovern 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# C_2022240EN.01001301.xml

| 22.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 June 2022

(2022/C 240/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0550 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0214 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3283 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,690 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 396,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6435 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9462 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3049 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5177 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3660 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2817 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6675 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4612 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 365,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7881 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0680 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5205 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 639,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6399 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,304 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,294 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4420 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2485 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,4230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0550

JPY

Japanese yen

143,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86010

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0214

ISK

Iceland króna

138,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3283

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,690

HUF

Hungarian forint

396,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6435

RON

Romanian leu

4,9462

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3049

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5177

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3660

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2817

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6675

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4612

KRW

South Korean won

1 365,09

ZAR

South African rand

16,7881

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0680

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5205

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 639,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6399

PHP

Philippine peso

57,304

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,294

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4420

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2485

INR

Indian rupee

82,4230

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 50806)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Function, Integration, and Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Legacy, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-6908.                         *ak41o@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 25, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23723 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P