alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 340/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 340 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5824 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 340

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5824 December 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2420 of 12 October 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2420 of 12 October 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 4.8

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              LOMAK PETROLEUM, INC.
                    1994 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

         I, Jeffery A. Bynum, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Range
Resources Corporation, formerly Lomak Petroleum, Inc., (the "Company") and that,
as such, I am authorized to execute this amendment on behalf of the Company,
and, DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT the following resolution was duly approved
and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on June 1, 1999:

         RESOLVED, that the Lomak Petroleum, Inc. 1994 Outside Directors Stock
         Option Plan (the "Plan"), as previously amended, be further amended as
         follows, effective June 1, 1999:

         1. The Plan shall be renamed the "Range Resources Corporation 1994
         Outside Directors Stock Option Plan" and all references to the name of
         the Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Plan as renamed herein.

         2. Section 3.(b) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the
         following substituted therefor:

         "(b) A Stock Option shall be exercisable during an Eligible Director's
         lifetime only by him or by his guardian or legal representative. Once
         vested, Stock Options may be exercised at the Exercise Price at any
         time during the period beginning one year after the Date of Grant and
         ending ten years after the Date of Grant, provided that 25% of the
         shares of Common Stock covered by any such Stock Option shall vest one
         year after such Date of Grant, an additional 25% of such shares shall
         vest two years after such Date of Grant, an additional 25% of such
         shares shall vest three years after such Date of Grant, and all
         remaining shares covered by such Stock Option shall vest four years
         after such Date of Grant, provided further that no Stock Option shall
         be exercisable until stockholder approval as described in Section 9 is
         obtained. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Eligible Director ceases
         to be a member of the Board for any reason, any outstanding Stock
         Options held by that Eligible Director may be exercised only in
         accordance with, and in the periods described in, Section 8(d)";

         and it is further

         RESOLVED, that the foregoing amendment of Section 3.(b) to the Plan
         shall be expressly subject to the Corporation obtaining any required
         shareholder approval thereof within twelve months of the date hereof.
         [Approved by Shareholders at May 24, 2000 Annual Meeting.]

June 1, 1999

                                                   /s/ Jeffery A. Bynum
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                          Jeffery A. Bynum
                                                          Corporate Secretary


                                      12
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3951 ) VICTORIA SILVA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 6, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Ching Lung Po



Ching Lung Po

Chief Executive Officer

November 15, 2004
#### Theodore Rosenwald et al., Respondents, *v.*Louis Goldstein et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

M. Strassman, for appellants.

Einstein *&*Townsend, for respondents.

McCarthy, J.

The trial - justice was right in excluding the testimony offered by the defendants for the purpose of showing a diversion of the note in suit by H. Koehler *&*Co.

The plaintiffs became owners of said note prior to its maturity and for a valuable consideration, and had no notice of such alleged diversion.

The fact that plaintiffs gave credit on an antecedent debt due from Koehler *&*Co. to them makes them holders in good faith for value. See § 51, chap. 612, Laws of 1897. Said section reads: “ Value is any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract. An' antecedent or preexisting debt constitutes value; and is deemed such whether the instrument is payable on demand or at a further time.”

Even without the aid of the law just referred to, the plaintiffs were *bona fide*holders of said note, because they received the same in absolute payment of part- of the debt due them.

We find there was no error, and judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Schuchman, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Lebanon

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Lebanon			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lebanon 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Lebanon

During the review period, the government published its executive budget proposal and enacted budget online but did not publish an end-of-year report.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available online.  However, information on state-owned enterprise debt guaranteed by the government was not available.  The budget documents did not present a full picture of expenditures and revenue.  Details regarding allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises were limited.  Military and intelligence budgets were not publicly available and were subject to limited oversight by an inspector general and the President’s High Defense Council.  The information in the budget was not considered reliable or reasonably accurate and did not correspond to actual revenues and expenditures.  The supreme audit institution does not meet international standards of independence and did not make its audit reports publicly available. Lebanon’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing in a timely fashion an end-of-year report;
- making information on state-owned enterprise debt publicly available;
- ensuring budget documents are substantially complete;
- detailing allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises;
- including all military revenue sources and expenditures in budget documents;
- enhancing the reliability of budget documents and publishing supplemental budgets when actual expenditures and revenues differ significantly from estimated figures;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence; and
- making supreme audit institution reports publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lebanon 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentLebanon

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ ) HABTAMU DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0345 (EGS) ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 2, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In its November 3, 2010 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by December 3, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested additional time to do so. Accordingly, the Court treats defendants’ motion as conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge DATED: December 10, 2010
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

 

AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

 

 

This AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC. (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 30, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) by and between OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”) and the Company employee identified on the signature page of this Amendment below (“Employee”).

 

WHEREAS, Employee is currently a party to a Management Retention Agreement entered into between the Company and Employee prior to the date of this Amendment (the “MRA”);

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto mutually desire to enter into this Amendment to amend the MRA, effective as of the Effective Date, to eliminate the so-called “walk at will” provision in the MRA, which provision generally provides Employee with the right, following a Change in Control of the Company, to terminate Employee’s employment with the Company for any reason, or no reason, within the 12-month period commencing with the date of the Change in Control and still receive certain severance payments and benefits as provided for under the terms of the MRA;

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee may amend the MRA though this Amendment if signed by both the Company and Employee; and

 

WHEREAS, certain capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the MRA (as defined below).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Employee hereby acknowledge and agree, effective as of the Effective Date, as follows:

 

1.     Amendment and Restatement of First Sentence of Section 6(b) of the MRA. The first sentence of Section 6(b) of the MRA is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: “by Employee for ‘good reason.’ ”

2.     Entire Agreement. The amended MRA, consisting of the MRA as amended as of the Effective Date by the Amendment, constitutes the full and entire understanding and agreement between the parties to the MRA with regard to the subjects hereof and thereof.

3.     Continuing Effectiveness. Except as otherwise provided in the Amendment, the MRA shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have executed this Amendment effective as of the Effective Date.

 

 

	
 
	
 OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Title:
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4358 [Reserved]
# C_2022032EN.01000101.xml

| 21.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 January 2022

(2022/C 32/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1338 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83265 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3708 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0382 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9578 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,263 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,81 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5228 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,2094 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5662 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4158 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8274 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6731 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5261 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 349,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2531 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1936 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 267,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7489 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,285 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,8952 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,319 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1621 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1684 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,3620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1338

JPY

Japanese yen

129,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83265

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3708

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0382

ISK

Iceland króna

145,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9578

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,263

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,81

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5228

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

15,2094

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5662

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4158

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8274

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6731

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5261

KRW

South Korean won

1 349,16

ZAR

South African rand

17,2531

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1936

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 267,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7489

PHP

Philippine peso

58,285

RUB

Russian rouble

86,8952

THB

Thai baht

37,319

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1621

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1684

INR

Indian rupee

84,3620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Home1994 Treaties and Agreements...Russian Federation (94-114) – Air Transport Agreement

# 									Russian Federation (94-114) – Air Transport Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

January 14, 1994

Transportation:  Aviation

Agreement signed at Moscow January 14, 1994; entered into force January 14, 1994. With annexes.
Download Agreement						 [27 MB]

Tags

Air Transport AgreementsRussiaTransportationTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
§ 1223.2 Policy, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *General policy.* FHFA's policy is to promote non-discrimination, diversity and, at a minimum, the inclusion of women, minorities, and individuals with disabilities in its own activities and in the business and activities of the regulated entities.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes minimum standards and requirements for the regulated entities to promote diversity and ensure, to the maximum extent possible, in balance with financially safe and sound business practices, the inclusion and utilization of minorities, women, individuals with disabilities, and minority-, women-, and disabled-owned businesses at all levels, in management and employment, in all business and activities, and in all contracts for services of any kind, including services that require the services of investment banking, asset management entities, broker-dealers, financial services entities, underwriters, accountants, investment consultants, and providers of legal services.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to each regulated entity's development, implementation, and adherence to diversity, inclusion, and non-discrimination policies, practices, and principles, including opportunities to award contracts for goods and/or services.
[75 FR 81402, Dec. 28, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 34395, July 25, 2017]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.63



                                                  March 9, 2000


Mr. Steven J. Lee
112 Farm Road
Sherborn, MA   01770

                      Re: AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the employment agreement dated as
of May 16, 1990, by and between you and PolyMedica Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of June 1, 1991;
December 5, 1991; March 18, 1993; March 31, 1994; April 11, 1995; April 3, 1996;
July 1, 1997; July 1, 1998; September 22, 1998; and June 14, 1999 (together, the
"Employment Agreement").

         SALARY. The Base Salary, as defined in Section 3.1. of the Employment
         Agreement, shall be increased to $400,000 effective April 1, 2000.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                                      Very truly yours,

                                                      /s/ Arthur A. Siciliano

                                                      Arthur A. Siciliano
                                                      President
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


/s/ Steven J. Lee
------------------------------
Steven J. Lee
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 77.14 Grant agreements. ( a ) *General.* After a grant is approved for award, VA will draft a grant agreement to be executed by VA and the grantee. Upon execution of the grant agreement, VA will obligate the grant amount. The grant agreement will include a provision requiring that the grantee will operate the program in accordance with the provisions of this part, 2 CFR Part 200, and the grant application.
( b ) *Equipment.* If grant funds will be used to procure or operate adaptive sports equipment to directly provide adaptive sports activities, the grant agreement must provide that: ( 1 ) Title to the adaptive sports equipment vests solely in the grantee, or, for leased equipment, in an identified lessor;
( 2 ) The grantee will at a minimum, provide liability insurance for the adaptive sports equipment to the same extent they would insure adaptive sports equipment procured with their own funds; and
( 3 ) Adaptive sports equipment will be safe to use and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
( c ) *Use of funds for administrative and personnel expenses.* ( 1 ) An eligible entity that receives a grant under this part may use a portion of the grant for administrative expenses and personnel expenses of the eligible entity. The amount that may be used for such expenses may not exceed: ( i ) In the case of a grant made for adaptive sports activities taking place during fiscal year 2014, 10 percent of the total amount of the grant;
( ii ) In the case of a grant made for adaptive sports activities taking place during fiscal year 2015, 7.5 percent of the total amount of the grant; and
( iii ) In the case of a grant made for adaptive sports activities taking place during any subsequent fiscal year, 5 percent of the total amount of the grant.
( 2 ) For purposes of § 77.14(c), personnel expenses include any costs associated with an employee of the eligible entity other than reimbursement for time spent by such an employee directly providing coaching or training for participants.
( d ) *Use of grant funds for individuals who are not veterans or members of the Armed Forces.* The grant agreement may authorize grantees to support or provide services (including adaptive sports activities) to individuals with disabilities who are not veterans or members of the Armed Forces, or both, but will prohibit grant funds from being used to support or provide services (including adaptive sports activities) to those individuals.
( e ) *Restrictions on the participation of certain veterans and former servicemembers.* The grant agreement will prohibit grant funds from being used to support or provide services (including adaptive sports activities) to veterans or former servicemembers who are barred from receiving VA benefits based on their service (see 38 U.S.C. 5303-5303A) and to veterans or former servicemembers who, if otherwise eligible, would be barred from receiving VA pension, compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation based on the character of their discharge from military service (see 38 CFR 3.12).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 521A(d)(4))
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley A. Galanski, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stanley  A. Galanski               |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Stanley A.  Galanski                   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 2,  2005                      |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to The Navigators Group, Inc. and will be retained by The NavigatorsGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----