alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Initial Review Group.                    

*Date:*                         October 15-16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5966,                         *wli@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 28, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23786 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JONATHAN MICHAEL STONE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 596 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0075 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2012 - SW - 104 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60567 (Summary Calendar)

ROBERT N. ANDERSON, JR., Petitioner,

versus

SOUTHERN STEVEDORING COMPANY, INC; TEXAS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE ASSOCIATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

Petition for Review of an Order of
the Benefits Review Board (86-2610)

May 19, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert N. Anderson appeals an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of medical benefits

under t he Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Anderson also appeals the ALJ’s

denial of a petition to modify the original denial. The Benefits Review Board (BRB) affirmed t he2

ALJ’s decisions. We have reviewed the record and the briefs, and conclude that the ALJ’s rulings

are supported by substantial evidence. The judgment of the BRB is therefore AFFIRMED.
**National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology** 

**Agenda August**  **2**
**- 3**  **, 2012 U.S. EPA**  **1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Ariel Rios South Building**  **, Room 2**  **13 8**  **Washington, DC 20460** 

**Thursday ,**  **August 2**  **, 2012 8:**  **00 am**  **Registration 8:30 am**  **Welcome, Introductions, and Overview of Agenda**

Mark Joy ce Associate Director and NACEPT Acting Designated Federal Officer EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach Cy nthia Jones

- Jackson Acting Director EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach NACEPT Chair
**9:00 am Opening Remarks** 

Bob Perciasepe EPA Deputy

Administrator
**9: 3**  **0 am Overview and Discussion of EPA’s**  **Internal Sustainability Initiatives** 

Craig E. Hooks Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Administration and Resources Management

**10:15 am Break** **10:30 am Overview and Discussion of EPA’s**  **External Sustainability Initiatives: Response to the**  **NAS Green Book “**  **Sustainability and the U.S.**  **EPA”** Bicky Corman Deputy Associate Administrator EPA Office of Policy

**11:15 am Overview of the Office of Research and Development’s** 

**Realignment Around Sustainability**
Dr. Robert Kavlock Deputy Assist ant Administrator for Science EPA Office of Research and Development **12:00 pm Public Comments**  **12:30 pm Lunch 1:30**  **pm Perspectives on the Development of Sustainability Metrics** 

Dr. Ronald Meissen Senior Director of Sustainability Baxter International Sara Kendall Vice President Corporate Affairs , Sustainability & EHS Wey erhaeuser Company Al ison Tay lor Vice President Sustainability

- America Sie mens Corpor ation Bridgett Luther President Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation I nstitute Bill Ross Visiting Professor of Environmental Sciences and Policy Duke Universit y **3:3 0 pm Break** **3 :**  **4 5**  **pm Sustainability Workgroups meet in separate, concurrent sessions.** 

**5:45 pm Adjourn** 

**Friday, August 3 , 2012** 

**8:30 am Discussion of Draft Advice Letter from the** 

**NACEPT Breakthrough Workgroup** Dr. Olufemi Osidele Senior Research Engineer Southwest Research Institute
**9:45 am**  **Discussion of Draft Advice Letter from the NACEPT Strengths Workgroup** 

Dr. Ronald Meissen Senior Director of Sustainability Baxter I nternational
**11:00 am Public Comments**  **11:30 am**  **Action Items 12:00 pm**  **Sustainability Workgroups meet in separate, concurrent sessions.**  **2:00 pm ADJOURN**
21 A PRIL 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Lee Vincent v. State

12

- 15

- 00019

- CR

Ms. Lusk :

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the

Court and the right to file a PDR. In accordance with Rule 48.4, t his letter was sent, by certified

mail to the defendant’s last known address

, however, we ha ve yet to receive the green card back.

As such, we are also enclosing a copy of our internal postage order receipt showing that on 31

March 2015, we sent the letter to Mr. Vincent by certified mail

.

Because the USPS tracking could not confirm any information about delivery, we have again

sent a letter regarding the opinion issued, and will confirm when this letter has been delivered.

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve JacksonIMb Tracing Number: 94147102008306680692

Print Date & Time: 03/31/15 12:58 PM

Ship Date: 03/31/15

Account: 780979

Type: Stamp

Postage Amount: $6.69

Address: Mr. Lee Vincent

Inmate: 01978797

Gurney Unit

1385 Fm 3328

Palestine TX 75803

- 5000

Piece Count: 2618

Postage Class: First

- Class Mail

Mailpiece: Letter

Services: Return Receipt, Certified Mail

Weight: 2 oz

Balance: $66.42

Description:

Insurance: None

Reference Number:27 M ARCH 2015

Mr. Lee Vincent

Inmate: 01978797

Gurney Unit

1385 FM 3328

Palestine, TX 75803

Re: Opinion

Mr. Vincent

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. The

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your

petition prior to the expira tion of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. That is by, 24

April 2015.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
§ 1209.36 Scheduling and pre-hearing conferences. ( a ) *Scheduling conference.* After service of a notice of charges commencing a proceeding under this part, the presiding officer shall order the representative(s) of record for each party, and any party not so represented who is appearing *pro se,* to meet in person or to confer by telephone at a specified time within 30 days of service of such notice for the purpose of setting the time and place of the testimonial hearing on the record to be held within the District of Columbia and scheduling the course and conduct of the proceeding (the “scheduling conference”). The identification of potential witnesses, the time for and manner of discovery, and the exchange of any pre-hearing materials including witness lists, statements of issues, stipulations, exhibits, and any other materials also may be determined at the scheduling conference.
( b ) *Pre-hearing conferences.* The presiding officer may, in addition to the scheduling conference, on his or her own motion or at the request of any party, direct representatives for the parties to meet with (in person or by telephone) at a pre-hearing conference to address any or all of the following: ( 1 ) Simplification and clarification of the issues;
( 2 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact and the contents, authenticity and admissibility into evidence of documents;
( 3 ) Matters of which official notice may be taken;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 5 ) Summary disposition of any or all issues;
( 6 ) Resolution of discovery issues or disputes;
( 7 ) Amendments to pleadings; and
( 8 ) Such other matters as may aid in the orderly disposition of the proceeding.
( c ) *Transcript.* The presiding officer, in his or her discretion, may require that a scheduling or pre-hearing conference be recorded by a court reporter. Any transcript of the conference and any materials filed, including orders, become part of the record of the proceeding. A party may obtain a copy of a transcript at such party's expense.
( d ) *Scheduling or pre-hearing orders.* Within a reasonable time following the conclusion of the scheduling conference or any pre-hearing conference, the presiding officer shall serve on each party an order setting forth any agreements reached and any procedural determinations made.
#### § 1268.7 Reporting requirements for acquired member assets.

Each Bank shall report information related to AMA in accordance with the instructions provided in the Data Reporting Manual issued by FHFA, as amended from time to time.
§ 1263.23 Excess stock. ( a ) *Sale of excess stock.* Subject to the restriction in paragraph (b) of this section, a member may purchase excess stock as long as the purchase is approved by the member's Bank and is permitted by the laws under which the member operates.
( b ) *Restriction.* Any Bank with excess stock greater than one percent of its total assets shall not declare or pay any dividends in the form of additional shares of Bank stock or otherwise issue any excess stock. A Bank shall not issue excess stock, as a dividend or otherwise, if after the issuance, the outstanding excess stock at the Bank would be greater than one percent of its total assets.
Exhibit - 10 ii



                           Reimbursement Agreements


The Scott James Fund will reimburse officers and directors not affiliated with
the Investment Adviser to compensate for travel expenses associated with
performance of their duties.  As the Fund grows in total assets, the  Board of
Directors may place them on salaries commensurate with their duties.

The Fund has no plans to compensate officers, employees and directors  who  are
affiliated with the Investment Adviser  except indirectly through payment of the
management fee.




























                                     - 1 -
#### § 1091.100 Scope and purpose.

This part sets forth procedures to implement section 1024(a)(1)(C) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1)(C)) and establishes rules to facilitate the Bureau's supervisory authority over certain nonbank covered persons pursuant to section 1024(b)(7) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 5514(b)(7)).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee; Allergy, Immunology & Transplantation Research Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 15, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Chicago,  151 Wacker Drive,  Chicago, IL 60601.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katrin Eichelberg, PhD,  Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Program,  Division of Extramural Activities,  NIAID/NIH/DHHS,  6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616,  Bethesda, MD 20892,  301-496-0818,                         *keichelberg@niaid.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation  Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 24, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23615 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Edits on the Preamble, Chapter 5, 7
12/16/2011 12:23 PM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob,

Attached are comments on the preamble. Also see comments received on chapters 5 and 7 below.

Regards,
Cortney

Chapter 5: Please make the language on page 5-100 and 5-101 of Chapter 5 of the RIA track better with the Exec Summary page E-4.

Chapter 7: On page 7-60, move the text in the comment box to the main text.

Pg. 7-33: The EPA has determined that this final rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low income, or indigenous populations because it increases the level of environmental protection for all affected populations. without having any disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any population, including any minority, low income, or indigenous populations. Pg. 7-34: Together, these rules and actions will have substantial and long-term effects on both the U.S. power industry and on communities currently breathing dirty air. Therefore, we anticipate significant interest in many, if not most, of these actions from EJ communities, as well as among many others.

Pg. 7-37: This was true both for the counties estimated to have the highest concentrations. In summary, the analysis indicates that in 2005, educational status, living in one of the poorest counties, and living in

a high-risk county are associated with higher estimated PM2.5 concentrations, and thus are predicted to have mortality risk that those living in other areas do not have. As similar pattern was not observed
for race is not.

Our analysis predicts that that this final rule will likely significantly reduce the PM2.5 mortality among all populations of different races living throughout the U.S. compared to both 2005 and 2016 pre-rule (i.e., base case) levels. The analysis indicates that people living in counties withthe highest concentrations of PM2.5 (top 5 percent) of PM 2.5 in 2005 receive the largest reduction in concentrations of PM, thus are predicted to have the largest county-level reductions in premature mortality risk after this rule takes effect. We also estimate that people living in the poorest 5 percent of the counties will experience a larger reduction in exposure to PM2.5, thus these counties are predicted to have a a greater reduction in mortality risk when compared with all other counties. More
information can be found below in section 7.11.3.

EO12866NESHAPMACT_NSPSforUtilitie sMATS2060_AP52Final20111215_Int eragencycommentsunderEO13563. docx
ISBA_2015_StockAwardIncentivePlan_Ex10.1




Exhibit 10.1
                                                                                                       
Stock Award Incentive Plan 


Isabella Bank Corporation adopts this equity incentive plan, to be called the Isabella Bank Corporation Stock Award Incentive Plan. The primary purpose of the plan is to promote the growth and profitability of the bank by attracting and retaining executive officers and key employees of outstanding competence through ownership of equity that provides them with incentives to achieve corporate objectives.
Eligibility Requirements
		
	•
	Eligible employees include the Bank Corporation CEO, Bank President, and Bank Corporation President.


		
	•
	Employees hired prior to October 1st of the plan year will be eligible for a prorated portion. Employees hired after October 1st will be eligible for this incentive plan beginning the next calendar year.


		
	•
	In order to receive the stock award, an employee must be actively employed on December 31st of the incentive plan year.  


		
	•
	Retirees will be paid a prorated portion of the incentive based on retirement date.  


		
	•
	No payouts will be made under this plan to an employee who has been terminated for misconduct, even if they were eligible according to dates of employment.


		
	•
	In order to receive the stock payment the employee must have received a “Meets Expectations” or higher on their most recent evaluation.




Stock Award Incentive Plan Details
		
	•
	The plan is based on the calendar year.


		
	•
	The incentive plan payout potential is 10% of an employee’s annualized base wage realized in Isabella Bank Stock.  


		
	•
	The Stock Award Incentive targets and measurements will mirror the objectives set yearly by the Board of Directors for the Employee Cash Incentive Plan.




Grant Conditions
The grant of stock shares is subject to the grant conditions set forth.  The shares will be issued only upon the satisfaction of the yearly performance measures and associated performance targets set by the Board of Directors.  If the grant conditions set by the Board of Directors are not satisfied as required, then this award and the grant of the shares shall lapse or be adjusted appropriately at the discretion of the Board of Directors.





Vesting
Granted shares shall be considered 100% vested in terms of ownership, common voting rights in all matters, right to be paid dividends, and any necessary tax considerations as a result of stock ownership. 
Restrictions on Transfer
Stock shares granted under the plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged, or assigned prior to the grantee satisfying one of the following conditions:  the employee’s retirement, the grantee’s voluntary/involuntary separation from service with or without cause, or the employee’s death or disability while an employee of the company.