alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022234EN.01000401.xml

| 17.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 June 2022

(2022/C 234/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0400 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85550 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6942 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0142 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4588 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,742 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 398,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7138 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0126 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4939 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3446 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1638 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6608 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4451 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6052 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9844 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 427,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5786 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,700 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,566 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2559 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4115 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1945 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0400

JPY

Japanese yen

138,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85550

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6942

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0142

ISK

Iceland króna

137,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4588

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,742

HUF

Hungarian forint

398,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7138

RON

Romanian leu

4,9443

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0126

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4939

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3446

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1638

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6608

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4451

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,88

ZAR

South African rand

16,6052

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9844

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 427,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5786

PHP

Philippine peso

55,700

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,566

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2559

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4115

INR

Indian rupee

81,1945

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### CLARENCE C. CULVER v. UNITED STATES

[60 C. Cls. 825; 271 U. S. 315]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. Upon certiorari the judgment was *reversed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

After issuance by the President of Army Regulation 1269%, an officer of flying status assigned to the War College, as a student, by order of the Secretary of War, was required by that regulation to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights, and was therefore entitled to extra pay under section 13a of the Army reorganization act; but prior to the date of that regulation it was otherwise, since the officer, even though he took regular flights, was not required to do so, being relieved from the Air Service regulation in that regard by the order of the Secretary assigning him to the War College.

Mr. Justice ButleR

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 24, 1926.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20968 Conference Calendar

ROQUE T. ARANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL WILSON; WAYNE SCOTT, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice; FRANK HOKE; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE LAW LIBRARY PERSONNEL, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-2739

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roque T. Aranda, Texas prisoner # 805045, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he alleged denial of access to the courts and challenged the dismissal of previous complaints. Aranda contends that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim when he had not been given an opportunity to amend his complaint.No. 00-20968 -2- Aranda, however, has provided us no basis upon which to determine that he had a viable claim that he could have included in an amended complaint. Accordingly, we must affirm the dismissal. See Jones v. Greninger , 188 F.3d 322, 327 (5th Cir. 1999); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A). The three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) “prohibits a prisoner from proceeding IFP if he has had three actions or appeals dismissed for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim.” Carson v. Johnson , 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997)(citing Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996)). Aranda has previously had at least five strikes against him. Aranda v. Key , No. 00-10849 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2001)(imposing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar); Aranda v. Shaw , No. 00-10844 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2001)(imposing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar); Aranda v. Millsaps , No. 99-11394 (5th Cir. Aug. 29, 2000). Aranda is reminded that he may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
AFFIRMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sheboygan River and Harboraquatic ecological risk assessment**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.2:AQ 3

Item Number:0250-E-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000855722
 
Volumes: 010203
 
April 8, 2020
HomeSchools Worldwide...Schools Worldwide – Schools at Post

# 									Schools Worldwide – Schools at Post							

May 14, 2024

These list contain both assisted and non-assisted schools at posts. Contact information for current assisted schools can be found in the 2023 2024 Assisted School Directory (pdf).  The lists below include U.S. and non-U.S. curriculum, religious, proprietary, and local public schools. 
        - Africa
        - East Asia and Pacific
        - Europe and Eurasia
        - Near East
        - South and Central Asia
        - Western Hemisphere

**Disclaimer:** The U.S. Department of State provides external links solely for our readers’ information and convenience.  The U.S. Department of State does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information contained on a linked website; does not endorse the organizations sponsoring linked websites or the views they express or the products/services they offer, and is not responsible for transmissions users receive from linked websites.

Back to Top
§ 160.60 Suretyship and guaranty. Pursuant to section 5(b)(2) of the HOLA, a Federal savings association may enter into a repayable suretyship or guaranty agreement, subject to the conditions in this section. ( a ) *What is a suretyship or guaranty agreement?* Under a suretyship, a Federal savings association is bound with its principal to pay or perform an obligation to a third person. Under a guaranty agreement, a Federal savings association agrees to satisfy the obligation of the principal only if the principal fails to pay or perform.
( b ) *What requirements apply to suretyship and guaranty agreements under this section?* A Federal savings association may enter into a suretyship or guaranty agreement under this section, subject to each of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The Federal savings association must limit its obligations under the agreement to a fixed dollar amount and a specified duration.
( 2 ) The Federal savings association's performance under the agreement must create an authorized loan or other investment.
( 3 ) The Federal savings association must treat its obligation under the agreement as a loan to the principal for purposes of 12 CFR 31.2 and part 32 of this chapter.
( 4 ) The Federal savings association must take and maintain a perfected security interest in collateral sufficient to cover its total obligation under the agreement.
( c ) *What collateral is sufficient?* ( 1 ) The Federal savings association must take and maintain a perfected security interest in real estate or marketable securities equal to at least 110 percent of its obligation under the agreement, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. ( i ) If the collateral is real estate, the Federal savings association must establish the value by a signed appraisal or evaluation in accordance with part 34, subpart C of this chapter. In determining the value of the collateral, the Federal savings association must factor in the value of any existing senior mortgages, liens or other encumbrances on the property, except those held by the principal to the suretyship or guaranty agreement.
( ii ) If the collateral is marketable securities, the Federal savings association must be authorized to invest in that security taken as collateral. The Federal savings association must ensure that the value of the security is 110 percent of the obligation at all times during the term of agreement.
( 2 ) The Federal savings association may take and maintain a perfected security interest in collateral which is at all times equal to at least 100 percent of its obligation, if the collateral is: ( i ) Cash;
( ii ) Obligations of the United States or its agencies;
( iii ) Obligations fully guarantied by the United States or its agencies as to principal and interest; or
( iv ) Notes, drafts, or bills of exchange or bankers' acceptances that are eligible for rediscount or purchase by a Federal Reserve Bank.
[76 FR 49030, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 37283, June 21, 2012; 79 FR 28401, May 16, 2014; 85 FR 42643, July 14, 2020]
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 378 -CV Ce dar s Ent e r ta inm e nt , L. P . , A ppe lla nt

v. Wynona J. Wi nters as Trusteeof B arnett2005 F am ily Trust , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MI LLS COUNTY , 35TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 07- 05- 5961 , HO NORAB LE STEP HEN ELLIS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Ce d ar s E n te rta inme n t, L . P. h a s f il e d it s U n o p p o s e d

M o ti o nto D is mi s s Ap p e a l. We g ra nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Waldrop a nd Henson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 19, 2008
#### § 1403.6 Special procedures for medical records.

Medical records in the custody of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation which are not subject to Office of Personnel Management regulations shall be disclosed either to the individual to whom they pertain or that person's authorized or legal representative or to a licensed physician named by the individual.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,261
<SECURITIES>                                   700,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,436)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               833,533
<PP&E>                                          78,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,030)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 897,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           782
<OTHER-SE>                                     640,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   897,424
<SALES>                                        291,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,568
<CGS>                                          144,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,017)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                410,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                   160,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,297
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.07


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1901

___________ Robert M. Jordan, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Dodge County Sheriff's Department; * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Defendant, * of Nebraska. * Dan Weddle, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity as Sheriff of Dodge County, * Nebraska, * * Defendant-Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 13, 2000 Filed: January 21, 2000

___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert M. Jordan was terminated from his job as a Dodge County, Nebraska deputy sheriff after an on-the-job injury left him with permanent physical limitations that rendered him unable to make forcible arrests and unable to lift and carry people in-2-

needor passively resisting demonstrators. Jordan sued Dodge County Sheriff Dan Weddle in his individual capacity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming Weddle violated Jordan's equal protection rights by terminating Jordan because of his disabilities. Weddle moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and appeals the denial of that motion. We reverse.
Weddle is entitled to qualified immunity if he did not violate Jordan's constitutional right to equal protection. Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers because he has not shown that any other Dodge County officer has been permitted to continue working with physical limitations and permanent medical restrictions like Jordan's. Because Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers, no equal protection violationcould have occurred and a reasonable officer in Weddle's place could not have known equal protection would be offended if Jordan were terminated. See Hansen v. Rimel , 104 F.3d 189, 190 (8th Cir. 1997). We thus reverse the district court's denial of Weddle's motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 1277.24 Liquidation, merger, or consolidation.

The respective rights of the Class A and Class B stockholders, in the event that the Bank is liquidated, merged, or otherwise consolidated with another Bank, shall be determined in accordance with the capital plan of the Bank, provided, however, that nothing in the capital plan shall be construed to limit any rights or authority granted FHFA under the Bank Act or the Safety and Soundness Act to issue any regulation or order or to take any other action that may affect or otherwise alter the rights or privileges of stock holders in a liquidation, merger, or consolidation of a Bank.
Order entered April 24 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 0 16 7 2
- CR No. 05
- 13
- 0 1720
- CR
FRANCISCO JAVIER ESC OBAR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F13
- 59278
- M, F11
- 71776
- M



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On March 4, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed. On April 22, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeals, we VACATE the March 4, 2014 order requiring findings. Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
§ 1024.30 Scope. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, this subpart applies to any mortgage loan, as that term is defined in § 1024.31.
( b ) *Exemptions.* Except as otherwise provided in § 1024.41(j), §§ 1024.38 through 1024.41 of this subpart shall not apply to the following: ( 1 ) A servicer that qualifies as a small servicer pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.41(e)(4);
( 2 ) A servicer with respect to any reverse mortgage transaction as that term is defined in § 1024.31; and
( 3 ) A servicer with respect to any mortgage loan for which the servicer is a qualified lender as that term is defined in 12 CFR 617.7000.
( c ) *Scope of certain sections.* ( 1 ) Section 1024.33(a) only applies to reverse mortgage transactions.
( 2 ) The procedures set forth in §§ 1024.39 through 1024.41 of this subpart only apply to a mortgage loan that is secured by a property that is a borrower's principal residence.
( d ) *Successors in interest.* A confirmed successor in interest shall be considered a borrower for purposes of § 1024.17 and this subpart.
[78 FR 10876, Feb. 14, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 60437, Oct. 1, 2013; 78 FR 80104, Dec. 31, 2013; 81 FR 72370, Oct. 19, 2016]
#### § 1277.21 Issuance of capital stock.

A Bank may issue either one or both classes of its capital stock (including subclasses), as authorized by § 1277.20, and shall not issue any other class of capital stock. A Bank shall issue its stock only to its members, or to former members to the extent those institutions are required to maintain a minimum stock investment for existing activities under the capital plan, and only in book-entry form. The Bank shall act as its own transfer agent. All capital stock shall be issued in accordance with the Bank's capital plan.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Reuben Earl Brigety, II – Republic of South Africa – February 2022

# 									Reuben Earl Brigety, II – Republic of South Africa – February 2022							

Certificate of Competency

February 1, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		Republic of South Africa

CANDIDATE:	Reuben Earl Brigety, II

	Reuben Brigety is leader, diplomat, policy maker and academic who served as the Vice-Chancellor and President of the University of the South and as the Mayor of Sewanee, Tennessee. Dr. Brigety currently serves as an Adjunct Senior Fellow for African Peace and Security, Council on Foreign Relations, and a Member of the Board of Counselors of McLarty Associates, Washington, D.C.  During the Obama Administration, Dr. Brigety served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau for Population, Refugees and Migration, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau of African Affairs, and then as U.S. Ambassador to the African Union and as the U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. His demonstrated record of leadership, his considerable experience as a diplomat and policy maker, and his extensive knowledge of African affairs makes him a well-qualified candidate to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of South Africa.

	Earlier, Dr. Brigety was a Civil-Military Affairs consultant for the U.S. Central Command, the Director of the Sustainable Security Program for the Center for American Progress, and as the Special Assistant to the Assistant Administrator for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance at the U.S. Agency for International Development. He was also Dean of the Elliott School of International Affairs at The George Washington University, the largest school of international affairs in the United States.

Dr. Brigety earned a B.S. (with merit) in Political Science and was designated a Distinguished Midshipman Graduate from the U. S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.  He holds an M.Phil in International Affairs, and a Ph.D. in International Affairs from the University of Cambridge in England. He is the author of numerous publications and speaks Spanish, French, and Amharic.

Back to Top
# Official Journal L 333/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6128 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 333

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6128 December 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1908 of 6 December 2018 on the accession of Samoa to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1908 of 6 December 2018 on the accession of Samoa to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Sabotage Convention – United States Department of State

- Transportation &#8211; Sabotage Convention &#8211; Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, April 19, 2024 Office of Treaty Affairs
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30628 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DEON THOMAS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-271-1 Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Deon Thomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D July 16, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk