alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Max Goldwasser, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

November, 1900.)

Negligence — Starting a surface street car while a passenger is trying to board it.

Where a conductor, who knows that a truck ahead of his ear is standing close to the track, starts his car while a passenger is trying to board it and is being impeded by persons who got on before him, and the passenger is injured by being carried on and struck against the truck, there is evidence of negligence in the conductor sufficient to justify a jury in giving damages to the passenger against the corporation operating the car.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. A truck was standing in the street, some twenty or thirty feet ahead of the car. The plaintiff claimed that, before he could get up the step and into the car, he was carried along, and struck his right side and leg against the truck.

H. A. Robinson (John T. Little, of counsel), for appellant.

M. D. Steuer, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the car was standing still when the plaintiff attempted to board'it; that the conductor knew at the time that the truck was standing close to the track; and that the car was started before the plaintiff had reached the platform, being impeded by *683the other passengers who hoarded the car just ahead of him. The conductor testifies that he saw two or three men attempting to board the car at once, and under these circumstances, knowing as he did the position of the truck, he should not have started the car until the plaintiff had safely boarded it. Moylan v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 583, differs materially as to its facts from the present case. There the plaintiff boarded the car while it was still moving, and when it was within six or seven feet of the wagon which he struck. It did not appear that the conductor had aiiy knowledge of the position of the wagon. In Caspers v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 156, the plaintiff remained standing on the foot board unnecessarily until he was hit by a truck standing near the track. There was nothing, as he himself testified, to prevent his entering the car if he had chosen to do so. In the present case the plaintiff was unable to get upon the platform. The charge was as favorable to the defendant as it had the right to ask, and there was evidence upon which the jury might properly find as it did, that the defendant had been guilty of negligence and the plaintiff free from contributory negligence.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in federally tax-exempt
revenue bonds, which financed construction and/or ownership of multi-
family residential properties.  In accordance with industry practice, its
balance sheet is unclassified.  For full informaiton, refer to the
accompanying unaudited financial statements.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1997
[CASH]                                       5,024,383
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  458,356
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             125,089,291<F1>
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                             0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                 117,305,243<F2>
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]               125,089,291<F3>
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             7,351,071<F4>
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               987,270<F5>
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              6,363,801
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          6,363,801
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 6,363,801
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .84<F6>
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include investment in
revenue bonds of $117,786,000, net deferred expenses of $888,301 and
escrowed funds of $932,251.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $1,127,799 
and excess of equity in losses of property-owning investees over investments
therein of $6,656,249.
<F4>Total revenue includes interest income of $7,351,071.
<F5>Other expenses include equity in losses of property-owning investees of
$636,587 and general and administrative expenses of $350,683.
<F6>Represents net income per Assigned Benefit Certificate.
</FN>
</TABLE>
# C_2022472EN.01000203.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/2

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court in respect of cases referred to Chambers of three Judges

(2022/C 472/04)

At its General Meeting on 11 October 2022, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Sixth Chamber

Mr Xuereb, President of the Chamber

Mr von Danwitz

Mr Kumin

Ms Ziemele

Seventh Chamber

Ms Arastey Sahún, President of the Chamber

Mr Biltgen

Mr Wahl

Mr Passer

Eighth Chamber

Mr Safjan, President of the Chamber

Mr Piçarra

Mr Jääskinen

Mr Gavalec

Ninth Chamber

Ms Rossi, President of the Chamber

Mr Bonichot

Mr Rodin

Ms Spineanu-Matei

Tenth Chamber

Mr Gratsias, President of the Chamber

Mr Ilešič

Mr Jarukaitis

Mr Csehi

---
#### The Western Union Sewing Machine Co., Appellant, *v.*Annie Sachs et al., Respondents.

Appear from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

C. B. Plante, for appellant.

A. Oberstein, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The burden of proof was upon the plaintiff and was not sustained. It appears that the whole agreement between *737the parties was not evidenced by the writing. There was a payment of two dollars and one of ten dollars on an unexplained account. If it was an account of rental as indicated on Exhibit 6., there was no default shown. If it was on account of purchase price there must have been a modification of the agreement suggested by Exhibit 6, and as it does not appear in what respect there was a modification it cannot be said that the plaintiff was entitled to the property.

In addition it may be said that there was no evidence of a refusal to deliver. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (OJP) Docket No. 1503]


Meeting of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an announcement of a meeting of the Public Safety 
Officer Medal of Valor Review Board to review applications for the 
2008-2009 Medal of Valor Awards and to discuss upcoming activities. The 
meeting time and location are located below.

DATES: October 23, 2009, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Office of Justice 
Programs, 810 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Joy, Policy Advisor, Bureau of 
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, 810 7th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531, by telephone at (202) 514-1369, toll free (866) 
859-2687, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98ffeafdfff7eae1b6f2f7e1d8edebfcf7f2b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddbaafb8bab2afa4f3b7b2a49da8aeb9b2b7f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor 
Review Board carries out those advisory functions specified in 42 
U.S.C. 15202. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15201, the President of the United 
States is authorized to award the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor, 
the highest national award for valor by a public safety officer. The 
purpose of this meeting is to review applications for the 2008-2009 
Medal of Valor Awards and to discuss upcoming activities related 
thereto.
    This meeting will be open to the public. For security purposes, 
members of the public who wish to attend must register at least five 
(5) days in advance of the meeting by contacting Mr. Joy. All attendees 
will be required to sign in at the front desk.

    Note:  Photo identification will be required for admission. 
Additional identification documents may be required.

    Access to the meeting will not be allowed without prior 
registration. Anyone requiring special accommodations should contact 
Mr. Joy at least five (5) days in advance of the meeting.

Pamela Cammarata,
Associate Deputy Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-24018 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2021502EN.01000101.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 502/01)

Last publication

OJ C 490, 6.12.2021

Past publications

OJ C 481, 29.11.2021

OJ C 471, 22.11.2021

OJ C 462, 15.11.2021

OJ C 452, 8.11.2021

OJ C 431, 25.10.2021

OJ C 422, 18.10.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2685

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

reauthorize the Matching Grant Program for School Security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2003

Mr. ROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. FROST, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. WHITFIELD, 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. EVANS, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. 

BOSWELL, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. CASE, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Ms. LINDA

T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. JACKSONLEE of Texas, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mrs. BONO, 

Mr. NADLER, and Mr. HYDE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to reauthorize the Matching Grant Program 

for School Security.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2685 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF MATCHING GRANT PRO2 GRAM FOR SCHOOL SECURITY. 

3 Section 2705 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

4 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797e) is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2008’’.

Æ
#### § 192.440 Stockholder voting rights after conversion.

A savings association must provide its stockholders with exclusive voting rights, except as provided in § 192.445(c).
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Riley, Richard H – Federal Republic of Somalia – March 2023

# 									Riley, Richard H – Federal Republic of Somalia – March 2023							

Certificate of Competency

April 28, 2023

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

 

SUBJECT:        Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:             Federal Republic of Somalia

CANDIDATE:  Richard H. Riley

Richard H. Riley, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as the Minister Counselor for Economic Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa, Canada.  Previously, Riley was the Consul General at U.S. Consulate General Peshawar, Pakistan, Assistant Chief of Mission at U.S. Embassy Kabul, Afghanistan, Deputy Chief of Mission at U.S. Embassy Sana’a, Yemen, and Senior Civilian Representative (Team Leader) at the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Nangahar Province, Afghanistan.  Earlier, he was Deputy Director of the Office of Egypt and Levant Affairs at the Department of State, Senior Coordinator for Democracy and Human Rights at U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Iraq, and Deputy Team Leader of the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Dhi Qar (Nassiriyah), Iraq.   His extensive senior leadership experience, including in Washington and at high-threat posts throughout the region, makes Riley well-qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Somalia.

During thirty years as a Foreign Service officer, Riley has also served as Charge d’Affaires a.i. and Deputy Chief of Mission at U.S. Embassy Oslo, Norway, and in Beijing and Chengdu, China; London, Moscow, and Kingston, Jamaica.  He is a recipient of the Matilda Sinclaire Language Award (Russian).

Riley earned a B.B.A. from the University of Georgia at Athens, an M.B.A. at Harvard Business School, and an M.S. (Distinguished Graduate) at the National War College.  He speaks Mandarin Chinese, French, Russian, Arabic and Pashto.

Back to Top
#### Eudora H. Blakely-Nellis, Respondent, v. Alfred M. Rau, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

Greenhall *&*Levy, for appellant.

L. & A. U. Linke, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment modified so as to be for $310.17, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
# Official Journal C 136/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.136.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 136 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5326 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.136.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 136

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5326 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 136/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 136/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY

                                LAMAR MEDIA CORP.


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



         Each of the undersigned officers of Lamar Advertising Company ("Lamar")
and Lamar Media Corp. ("Media") certifies, to his knowledge and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Lamar and Media for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in that combined Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Lamar and Media.



Dated:  March 25, 2003      By:  /s/ Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                 Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Advertising
                                 Company
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Lamar Media Corp.


Dated:  March 25, 2003      By:  /s/ Keith A. Istre
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                 Keith A. Istre
                                 Chief Financial Officer, Lamar Advertising
                                 Company
                                 Chief Financial Officer, Lamar Media Corp.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lamar and Media and will be retained by Lamar and Media and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1102

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

#### § 1102.110 Penalties.

Title 18 U.S.C. 1001 makes it a criminal offense, subject to a maximum fine of $10,000, or imprisonment for not more than 5 years or both, to knowingly and willingly make or cause to be made any false or fraudulent statements or representations in any matter within the jurisdiction of any agency of the United States. 5 U.S.C. 552a(i) makes it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000 for any person knowingly and willfully to request or obtain any record concerning an individual from the ASC under false pretenses. 5 U.S.C. 552a(i) (1) and (2) provide criminal penalties for certain violations of the Privacy Act by officers and employees of the ASC.
§ 19.40 Review by the Comptroller. ( a ) *Notice of submission to the Comptroller.* When the Comptroller determines that the record in the proceeding is complete, the Comptroller will serve notice upon the parties that the proceeding has been submitted to the Comptroller for final decision.
( b ) *Oral argument before the Comptroller.* Upon the initiative of the Comptroller or on the written request of any party filed with the Comptroller within the time for filing exceptions, the Comptroller may order and hear oral argument on the recommended findings, conclusions, decision, and order of the ALJ. A written request by a party must show good cause for oral argument and state reasons why arguments cannot be presented adequately in writing. A denial of a request for oral argument may be set forth in the Comptroller's final decision. Oral argument before the Comptroller must be on the record.
( c ) *Comptroller's final decision* — ( 1 ) Decisional employees may advise and assist the Comptroller in the consideration and disposition of the case. The final decision of the Comptroller will be based upon review of the entire record of the proceeding, except that the Comptroller may limit the issues to be reviewed to those findings and conclusions to which opposing arguments or exceptions have been filed by the parties.
( 2 ) The Comptroller will render a final decision within 90 days after notification of the parties that the case has been submitted for final decision, or 90 days after oral argument, whichever is later, unless the Comptroller orders that the action or any aspect thereof be remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings. Copies of the final decision and order of the Comptroller will be served upon each party to the proceeding, upon other persons required by statute, and, if directed by the Comptroller or required by statute, upon any appropriate State or Federal supervisory authority.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, I, Burton J. Kunik, Chief Executive officer of Sharps Compliance Corp. (the "Company"), state and attest, to the best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
BURTON J. KUNIK

Dr.
Burton J. Kunik
Chairman of the Board,
and Chief Executive Officer
September 20, 2002

---

QuickLinks
116 STAT. 128 PUBLIC LAW 107–165—APR. 18, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2910:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Oct. 30, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): Mar. 22, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–165

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3131 South

Crater Road in Petersburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘Norman Sisisky Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3131 South Crater Road in Petersburg, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Norman Sisisky Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Norman

Sisisky Post Office Building’’.

Approved April 18, 2002.

Apr. 18, 2002

[H.R. 2910]
June 2, 2016 

Mr. Carlos Gomez 

Vice President, Director of Maintenance 

Florida Air Transport Inc. 

5820 Miami Lakes Drive East 

Miami Lakes, FL 33014 

Dear Mr. Gomez: 

We have received your May 23, 2016, correspondence withdrawing your February 2, 2016, 

petition on behalf of Florida Air Transport Inc. for an exemption from §§ 125.265 and 91.529 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2016-3412). No further action 

will be taken on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Katie Haley 

Acting Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Office of Rulemaking
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 39 40 41 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/16 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●