alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the OM
Group, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the OM
Group, Inc. Statements of Consolidated Income for the three months ended March
31, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
                                             
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    223,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,984
<PP&E>                                         197,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 592,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   592,955
<SALES>                                        110,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,055
<CGS>                                           83,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (306)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                  71
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           83
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,065
<PP&E>                                  104
<DEPRECIATION>                          44
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,387
<BONDS>                                 75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                13,648
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            5,061
<SALES>                                 4,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        4,243
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                          (41)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.22)


</TABLE>
KENNETH L. SHIRAH, SR.

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF I F FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4157

Opinion filed November 5, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Or iginal Jurisdiction

.

Kenneth L. Shirah, Sr., pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

T he petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY , JJ., CONCUR.
§ 1081.404 Oral argument before the Director. ( a ) *Availability.* The Director will consider appeals, motions, and other matters properly before the Director on the basis of the papers filed by the parties without oral argument unless the Director determines that the presentation of facts and legal arguments in the briefs and record and decisional process would be significantly aided by oral argument, in which case the Director will issue an order setting the date on which argument will be held. A party seeking oral argument must so indicate on the first page of that party's opening or answering brief.
( b ) *Public arguments; transcription.* All oral arguments will be public unless otherwise ordered by the Director. Oral arguments before the Director will be reported stenographically, unless otherwise ordered by the Director. Motions to correct the transcript of oral argument must be made according to the same procedure provided in § 1081.304(b).
300 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.  Bldg 1 Tempe, AZ 85281 Office: 602.852.6604 Exhibit 33.6 Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria 1. Carvana, LLC ( “Carvana”), as sponsor and administrator, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all publicly-registered asset-backed securities transactions for which Carvana acted as sponsor and administrator involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platform are set forth in Appendix A hereto. 2. Carvana used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All other servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to Carvana based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 4. Carvana has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Carvana’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period. March 29, 2023 Title: Vice President, Secretary Carvana, LLC By: /s/ Paul Breaux Name: Paul W. Breaux
 2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3  Appendix A  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Availability of a Novel Fiberglass Technology for 
Exclusive, Partially Exclusive or Non-Exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to 
a novel fiberglass technology (e-glass; s-glass, etc.) as described in 
U.S. Patent Application 11/639,221 filed on 12/15/06; entitled ``Nano-
Textured Solid Surfaces and Methods for Producing Same''; Jensen and 
McKnight. Any license shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 
404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: RDRL-
DB/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, Telephone: (410) 
278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23767 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7322

KERRY LEE SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN GARRAGHTY, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-763-3) Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kerry Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purposes of this appeal we assume that the date Smith wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Kerry Lee Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition for habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Smith’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 27, 1999. Smith’s notice of appeal was filed on September 28, 1999. * Because Smith failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1265.3 Core mission activities. The following Bank activities qualify as core mission activities: ( a ) Advances;
( b ) Acquired member assets (AMA), except that United States government-insured or guaranteed whole single-family residential mortgage loans acquired under a commitment entered into after April 12, 2000 shall qualify only in a cumulative dollar amount up to 33 percent of: The cumulative total dollar amount of AMA acquired by a Bank after April 12, 2000, less the cumulative dollar amount of United States government-insured or guaranteed whole single-family residential mortgage loans acquired after April 12, 2000 under commitments entered into on or before April 12, 2000 (which calculation, at the discretion of two or more Banks, may be made based on aggregate transactions among those Banks);
( c ) Standby letters of credit;
( d ) Intermediary derivative contracts;
( e ) Debt or equity investments: ( 1 ) That primarily benefit households having a targeted income level, a significant proportion of which must benefit households with incomes at or below 80 percent of area median income, or areas targeted for redevelopment by local, state, tribal or Federal government (including Federal Empowerment Zones and Enterprise and Champion Communities), by providing or supporting one or more of the following activities: ( i ) Housing;
( ii ) Economic development;
( iii ) Community services;
( iv ) Permanent jobs; or
( v ) Area revitalization or stabilization;
( 2 ) In the case of mortgage- or asset-backed securities, the acquisition of which would expand liquidity for loans that are not otherwise adequately provided by the private sector and do not have a readily available or well established secondary market; and
( 3 ) That involve one or more members or housing associates in a manner, financial or otherwise, and to a degree to be determined by the Bank;
( f ) Investments in SBICs, where one or more members or housing associates of the Bank also make a material investment in the same activity;
( g ) SBIC debentures, the short term tranche of SBIC securities, ore other debentures that are guaranteed by the Small Business Administration under title III of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (15 U.S.C. 681 *et seq.*);
( h ) Section 108 Interim Notes and Participation Certificates guaranteed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development under section 108 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5308); and
( i ) Investments and obligations issued or guaranteed under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 *et seq.*).
[65 FR 43981, July 17, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,249,655
<SECURITIES>                                 1,342,027
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,499,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                   303,320
<INVENTORY>                                  7,290,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,636,640
<PP&E>                                       1,834,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 669,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,160,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,736,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,146
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,956,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,160,419
<SALES>                                     23,378,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,378,698
<CGS>                                       19,027,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,668,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,382,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             327,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,703,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (834,191)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,865,872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,865,872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANTONIO DALEY, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-643

LT Case No. 2021-DR-003838

ELAINE SCHIMMING DALEY, 

Appellee. 

_______________________________/ 

Decision filed August 16, 2022

Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Seminole County, 

Christopher Sprysenski, Judge.

Wayne C. Golding, Sr., of The

Golding Law Group, PLC., Orlando,

for Appellant.

Mark S. Troum, of The Troum Law

Firm, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
41452.

#### HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. MARYS v. EASON, Administrator.

Decided October 20, 1966

Rehearing deniedOctober 28, 1966.

*Bennet, Gilbert, Gilbert & Whittle, Wallace E. Harrell, Robert W. Harrison, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Nathan, Hutto■ & Lee, Jack S. Hutto,*for appellee.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court in reversing this court’s judgment in *Hospital Authority of City of St. Marys v. Eason,*113 Ga. App. 401 (148 SE2d 499), held that the principle of res ipsa loquitur was inapplicable to the case and that otherwise the evidence was insufficient to raise an issue as to the defendant’s liability for its patient’s injuries. Accordingly, this court’s previous judgment in the case is vacated. See 222 Ga. 536.

The effect of the holding of the Supreme Court is that the evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is reversed with direction to the trial court to grant the motion and enter judgment for the defendant.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                        Report of Independent Accountants



Card Acquisition Funding LLC, Transferor,
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Servicer,

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card
Receivables, that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank"), as servicer of
the Chase USA Master Trust (formerly known as Providian Master Trust),
maintained effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables as of December 31, 2003, based upon the criteria for effective
internal control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Bank's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
servicing of securitized credit card receivables. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
servicing of the securitized credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., as
servicer of the Chase USA Master Trust, maintained effective internal control
over servicing of securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2003,
is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon the criteria for
effective internal control established in "Internal Control - Integrated
Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 25, 2004
**EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 333-120260, No.333-43925, No. 333-48172, No. 333-94223, and No. 333-98123) of CDW Corporation of our report datedMarch 15, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  Chicago, Illinois  March 15, 2005
#### § 150.510 What must I do if state authorities refuse my deposit?

If state authorities refuse to accept your deposit under § 150.490, you must deposit the securities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of which you are a member. The Federal Home Loan Bank will hold the securities for the protection of private or court trusts to the same extent as if the securities had been deposited with state authorities.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-39215, 333-26153, 333-17299, 333-15181, 33-80706, and 33-
65756) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan of OPTi, Inc. of
our report dated February 14, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of OPTi Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ KPMG

San Jose, California
March 30, 2000
# Official Journal C 302/30 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4830 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 302

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4830 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 302/1 | Final annual accounts of the European Communities — Financial year 2004 — Volume I — Consolidated reports on implementation of the budget and consolidated financial statements | 1 |
| 2005/C 302/2 | The Court of Auditors' Statement of Assurance | 100 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 302/1

Final annual accounts of the European Communities — Financial year 2004 — Volume I — Consolidated reports on implementation of the budget and consolidated financial statements

1

2005/C 302/2

The Court of Auditors' Statement of Assurance

100

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN