50958 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before December 1, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Steven A. Grossman, Office of Financial 

Management, U.S. Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20581. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven A. Grossman, (202) 418–5192; 

FAX (202) 418–5529; e-mail: 

sgrossman@cftc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA, Federal agencies must obtain 

approval from the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 

information they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 

1320.3(c) and includes agency requests 

or requirements that members of the 

public submit reports, keep records, or 

provide information to a third party. 

Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal 

agencies to provide a 60-day notice in 

the Federal Register concerning each 

proposed collection of information, 

including each proposed extension of an 

existing collection of information, 

before submitting the collection to OMB 

for approval. To comply with this 

requirement, the Commission is 

publishing notice of the proposed 

collection of information listed below. 

With respect to the following 

collection of information, the 

Commission invites comments on: 

• Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have a practical use; 

• The accuracy of the Commission’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

• Ways to enhance the quality of, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden of 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

Procurement Contracts, OMB Control 

No. 3038–0031—Extension 

The information collection consists of 

procurement activities relating to 

solicitations, amendments to 

solicitations, requests for quotations, 

construction contracts, awards of 

contracts, performance bonds, and 

payment information for individuals 

(vendors) or contractors engaged in 

providing supplies or services. 

The Commission estimates the burden 

of this collection of information as 

follows: 

ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Annual number of respondents Frequency of 

response 

Total annual 

responses 

Hours per 

response Total hours 

182 ................................................................................................................... Annually 182 2 364 

There are no capital costs or operating 

and maintenance costs associated with 

this collection. 

Dated: September 28, 2009. 

David Stawick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–23815 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Intent To Prepare a Draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Puget Sound Nearshore Marine 

Habitat Restoration Project, WA 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), 

Seattle District, as lead Federal agency, 

will prepare a draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) 

evaluating a process based restoration 

project in the marine nearshore zone of 

Puget Sound, Washington to address the 

interruption and degradation of 

nearshore habitat resulting from the 

disturbance of habitat forming processes 

caused by various human influences. 

This environmental impact statement 

will be a combined Federal NEPA and 

Washington State Environmental Policy 

Act (SEPA) document. The lead agency 

for SEPA will be the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife. This is 

an opportunity for public comment; 

there will not be a separate SEPA 

process. 

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section for meeting dates. 

ADDRESSES: Mrs. Chemine Jackels, 

Environmental Resources Section, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 

3755, Seattle, WA 98124–3755. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions regarding the scoping process 

or preparation of the draft PEIS may be 

directed to: Chemine Jackels (206) 764– 

3646. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

1. Proposed Action: The Corps of 

Engineers and the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife 

propose to evaluate alternative process 

based habitat restoration actions in the 

nearshore zone of Puget Sound (defined 

as that portion of Puget Sound that 

extends waterward from the upland and 

backshore areas that directly influence 

conditions along the marine shoreline to 

the depth offshore where light 

penetration falls below a level that 

supports plant growth and in river 

deltas to the head of tide) which 

encompasses Whatcom, Skagit, Island, 

San Juan, Snohomish, King, Pierce, 

Thurston, Mason, Kitsap, Jefferson, and 

Clallam counties, Washington. For 

preparation of this draft PEIS, the Corps, 

Seattle District is the lead Federal 

agency under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq.) and the Council on Environmental 

Quality’s implementing guidelines (40 

CFR 1500–1508). The Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife is the 

lead State agency under the Washington 

SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW) and the 

SEPA guidelines (Chapter 197–11 

WAC). 

The Corps is authorized to study 

Puget Sound water uses under Section 

209 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 

(Pub. L. 87–874). Corps of Engineers 

activities in ecosystem restoration will 

concentrate on restoring and performing 

scientific analysis of habitat forming 

processes (i.e., hydrology, sediment 

transport, nutrient delivery) in the 

marine nearshore zone of Puget Sound. 

The proposed action could potentially 

restore nearshore ecosystem habitat and 

processes by reconnecting isolated 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 50959 

habitat elements, increasing shoreform 

diversity, establishing areas of estuarine 

habitat, increasing floodplain habitat 

and connectivity, restoring small 

lagoons and estuaries, increasing the 

amount of submerged, emergent, and 

riparian vegetation, replenishing and 

protecting beach sediments, and 

improving tidal exchange. If the 

proposed action were approved, initial 

construction could begin in 2014. 

2. Restoration Alternatives: Three 

programmatic restoration alternatives 

are currently being considered and 

evaluated in the environmental impact 

statement. The No Action alternative, as 

required by NEPA and SEPA, would 

include various agencies and groups 

continuing to implement small-scale 

restoration projects within existing 

frameworks without the implementation 

of this Corps of Engineers and 

Washington Department of Fish and 

Wildlife project. Continued 

implementation of restoration projects 

would focus on reconnecting isolated 

habitat elements, localized shoreline 

revegetation, restoration of estuary 

features and other discrete projects as 

real estate and funding allows. The 

second alternative is to pursue 

restoration of Puget Sound nearshore 

ecosystem processes using physical 

actions to remove or mitigate barriers to 

habitat forming processes and/or create 

habitats that have been lost as a result 

of those barriers. Under this alternative, 

plans may be formulated, including 

strategic restoration, which uses change 

analysis data comparing current and 

historic conditions as a means to 

identify candidate restoration sites 

based on criteria established by an 

interdisciplinary team, as well as 

stakeholders. The third alternative 

focuses on non-structural means to 

restore nearshore processes in Puget 

Sound. This non-structural alternative 

would include actions such as 

education, regulation, and changes in 

land-use policy. These three alternatives 

are not final and may not be analyzed 

in the final EIS, as they may change 

and/or new alternatives may develop 

during the scoping and NEPA process. 

3. Scoping and Public Involvement: 

Public involvement will be sought 

during the study in accordance with 

NEPA and SEPA procedures. Public 

meetings will be held at the beginning 

of the NEPA process to scope the efforts 

that will be undertaken to prepare the 

draft PEIS. The objectives of the public 

meetings will be to clarify issues of 

major concern, identify information that 

might be needed to analyze and evaluate 

impacts, obtain public input on the 

range and acceptability of approaches 

and provide further definition of 

alternatives. This notice of intent 

formally commences the joint scoping 

process under NEPA and SEPA. As part 

of the scoping process, all affected 

Federal, state, and local agencies, Native 

American tribes, and interested private 

organizations, including environmental 

interest groups, are invited to comment 

on the scope of the draft PEIS. 

Comments are requested concerning 

project alternatives, mitigation 

measures, probable significant 

environmental impacts, and permits or 

other approvals that may be required. 

To date, the following impact areas have 

been identified and will be analyzed in 

depth in the draft PEIS: (1) Marine 

mammals, fish, and invertebrates and 

their habitat, (2) sediment supply, (3) 

wetlands and estuaries, (4) submerged, 

emergent, and riparian vegetation, (5) 

wildlife, (6) land use, (7) public safety, 

and (8) hydrologic connectivity. The 

environmental review process will be 

comprehensive and will integrate and 

satisfy the requirements of NEPA 

(Federal), SEPA (Washington State), and 

other relevant Federal, state, and local 

environmental laws. The public scoping 

period will commence on October 26, 

2009 in conjunction with the first 

scoping meeting and will extend 

throughout the development of the joint 

NEPA/SEPA PEIS. Four scoping 

meetings will be held throughout the 

Puget Sound region from 4 p.m. to 7 

p.m. The meeting dates and locations 

are as follows: 

October 26: Highline Community 

College, 2400 S. 240th St., Des Moines, 

WA 98198. 

October 28: The chapel at Fort 

Worden State Park, 200 Battery Way, 

Port Townsend, WA 98368. 

November 3: Lacey Community 

Center, 6729 Pacific Avenue SE., in the 

Woodland Creek Community Park, 

Lacey, WA 98503. 

November 10: Skagit Station, 105 E. 

Kincaid, Mount Vernon, WA 98273. 

All Federal, State, and local agencies, 

Native American Tribes, other 

interested private organizations, and the 

general public are invited to participate. 

Public comments will be considered in 

development of the draft PEIS. The 

formal public comment period will 

extend until December 10, 2009. 

4. Other Environmental Review, 

Coordination, and Permit Requirements: 

Other environmental review, 

coordination, and permit requirements 

include preparation of a Clean Water 

Act, Section 404(b)(1) evaluation by the 

Corps, and consultation among the 

Corps, State of Washington, U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service, and National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration per Section 7 of the 

Endangered Species Act. Coordination 

will be continued with the U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service to meet the 

requirements of the Fish and Wildlife 

Coordination Act and initiated with 

Washington Department of Ecology for 

Clean Water Act compliance, and with 

the Washington Department of 

Archaeology & Historic Preservation for 

compliance with Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act. 

5. Availability of the Draft PEIS: The 

draft PEIS is scheduled for release 

during the summer of 2012 and the final 

PEIS is scheduled for release during the 

winter of 2012. 

Anthony O. Wright, 

Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer. 

[FR Doc. E9–23765 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3720–58–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Notice of Availability of a Novel 

Fiberglass Technology for Exclusive, 

Partially Exclusive or Non-Exclusive 

Licenses 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

announces the general availability of 

exclusive, partially exclusive or nonexclusive licenses relative to a novel 

fiberglass technology (e-glass; s-glass, 

etc.) as described in U.S. Patent 

Application 11/639,221 filed on 12/15/ 

06; entitled ‘‘Nano-Textured Solid 

Surfaces and Methods for Producing 

Same’’; Jensen and McKnight. Any 

license shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 

and 37 CFR part 404. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 

Laboratory, Office of Research and 

Technology Applications, ATTN: 

RDRL–DB/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving 

Ground, MD 21005–5425, Telephone: 

(410) 278–5028. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–23767 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Department of Defense Historical 

Advisory Committee; Meeting 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES