alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1235.6 Access to records.

Each regulated entity and the Office of Finance shall make its records available promptly upon request by FHFA, at a location and in a form and manner acceptable to FHFA.
#### § 150.210 Must I conduct another review of an account after I accept it?

After you accept a fiduciary account for which you have investment discretion, you must conduct a prompt review of all assets of the account to evaluate whether they are appropriate, individually and collectively, for the account.
HomeKey Topics – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Research

# 									Research							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## 								Learn More							

        -            - Fighting Human Trafficking Through Research
          - Research Inroads
          - U.S. Government-Funded Research 

Research is an integral vehicle for enhancing the U.S. government’s understanding of the multifaceted nature of human trafficking and guiding its anti-trafficking policies and programs. Research has also led the anti-trafficking community to rethink existing assumptions and examine new approaches to combat human trafficking. The TIP Office supports evidence-based research that identifies effective strategies for combating this crime.

### Commitment To Fighting Human Trafficking Through Research

Over the last decade the U.S. government has funded research focused on labor and sex trafficking in every global area. There has been research on a myriad of topics related to human trafficking, including victim services, law enforcement actions, and methods of prevention. There have also been significant research evaluation studies to measure program effectiveness, impact, and potential for replication. Research has begun to make inroads and close knowledge gaps in our understanding about human trafficking.

### Research Inroads

        - For example, Department of Justice funded research has begun to track trafficking within the United States and has uncovered effective techniques for both finding victims and improving law enforcement responses to these victims.
        - The Department of State, for instance, has funded IOM’s Counter-Trafficking Module Database, leading to greater analysis of evolving trends. These trends include the growing recognition of trafficking of men, greater identification of an older victim population, and an increased awareness of forced labor cases.
        - The U.S. government continues to fund qualified organizations through grants and cooperative agreements. U.S. government agencies periodically seek proposals from qualified U.S. organizations, researchers, and academic institutions to conduct research on human trafficking.

### U.S. Government-Funded Research

Want to learn more?

To find out more information on a specific research report, please see the research links found in the chart [113 KB] or contact the authors directly.

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
42121.

#### MASSEY v. STEPHENS.

Argued July 6, 1966

Decided September 6, 1966.

*L. B. Kent,*for appellant.

*Hatcher, Stubbs, Land & Rothschild, J. Rudolph Jones,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Herschel F. Massey sued Ralph Stephens to recover for injuries and damages sustained when an automobile owned by the defendant, and being driven by a member of his family as a family-purpose automobile, struck the rear of the plaintiff’s truck while the plaintiff had stopped in a line of traffic. No question of comparative negligence was involved in the case, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $810. On appeal the plaintiff contends that the verdict in the amount of $810 was so grossly inadequate as to be contrary to law. *Held:*

A verdict finding for the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, and where under the uncontradicted evidence the plaintiff’s special damages (medical expenses, damage to his truck and loss of earnings) amounted to more than the verdict without even considering any amount for pain and suffering, the verdict was so inadequate as to require a new trial. See *McLendon v. Floyd,*59 Ga. App. 506 (1 SE2d 446); *Tallent v. McKelvey,*105 Ga. App. 660 (125 SE2d 65).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(2006/C 286/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and of other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all state aid within the sector.

(2)  This scheme will be adapted according to the rules applicable after review of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002.

(3)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

----
#### George F. Adams, Appellant, *v.*The Old Dominion Steamship Co., Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of defendant.

Hyland & Zabriskie (Nelson Zabriskie, of counsel), for appellant.

Owen *&*Sturges (Frank D. Sturges, of counsel), for respondent.

Hascall, J.

We think that the case was properly tried and determined upon the merits below, and that the ^appellant’s exceptions do not call for reversal.

Judgment and order denying "motion for new trial affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.-

Conlan, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of DHB Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dawn
Schlegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2003                         By: /s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
                                                  ________________________
                                                   Dawn M. Schlegel
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 1012.238 Notices of proceedings to terminate exemptions. A proceeding to terminate a self-determining exemption under § 1010.14 or an exemption order under § 1010.15 or § 1010.16 is commenced by issuance and service of a notice which shall contain: ( a ) In the case of an exemption under § 1010.14, an identification of the developer and subdivision to which this notice applies. In the case of an exemption under either § 1010.15 or § 1010.16, an identification of the exemption order to which the notice applies.
( b ) A clear and concise statement of material facts, sufficient to inform the respondent with reasonable definiteness of the basis for the Director's determination that further exemption from the registration and disclosure requirements is not in the public interest or that the sales or leases do not meet the requirements for exemption, or both.
( c ) A notice of hearing rights of the respondent under § 1012.239 and of the procedures for invoking those rights.
( d ) A notice that failure to file an answer conforming to the requirements of § 1081.201(b) and (c) will result, in the case of a notice issued under § 1010.14, in an order terminating eligibility for the exemption, or, in the case of a notice issued under either § 1010.15 or § 1010.16, in an order terminating the exemption order.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Irina Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Andrew Pantin, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gialleonardo, Frankini &amp; Harms (Doris Rinck, Esq.), for appellant.Law Offices of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C. (Marina Josovich, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered May 14, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on the first two causes of action and denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing those causes of action.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order as granted the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on the first two causes of action and denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing those causes of action.</p><p>Contrary to defendant's argument, the Civil Court properly granted the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on the first two causes of action and denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing those causes of action on the ground that the first independent medical examination had not been scheduled to be held within 30 days of defendant's receipt of the claims underlying those causes of action, as required by 11 NYCRR 65-3.5 (d) <i>(see W.H.O. Acupuncture, P.C. v Travelers Home &amp; Mar. Ins. Co.</i>, 36 Misc 3d 152[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51707[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2012]; <a href="../2015/2015_50476.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also O &amp; M Med., P.C. v Travelers Indem. Co.</i>, 47 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50476[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 27, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert F.X. Sillerman, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

**Dated:  August 8, 2006**

|        |   | By:    |     | /s/ ROBERT F.  X. SILLERMAN                         |
|--------|--------|--------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |     | Robert F. X. Sillerman                              |
|   |   |   | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board* |
|   |   |   | * * | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                     |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

41

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         3,124
<SECURITIES>                                   5,218
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    13,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,245
<PP&E>                                         39,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 78,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,022
<BONDS>                                        23,853
<COMMON>                                       30
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   78,960
<SALES>                                        19,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,790
<CGS>                                          22,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,612 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
TOTAL COSTS INCLUDE EXPENSES FOR BOTH FUNDED AND UNFUNDED R&D PROJECTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 61.82 Participant fees for supportive housing. ( a ) Each participant of supportive housing may be required to pay a participant fee in an amount determined by the recipient, except that such participant fee may not exceed 30 percent of the participant's monthly income after deducting medical expenses, child care expenses, court ordered child support payments, or other court ordered payments; nor may it exceed the program's set maximum rate or the HUD Fair Market Rent for that type of housing and its location, whichever is less. The participant fee determination and collection process/procedures should be documented in the grant recipient's operating procedures to ensure consistency, fairness, and accuracy of fees collected. The participant's monthly income includes all income earned by or paid to the participant.
( b ) Retroactive benefit payments from any source to program participants, for the purpose of this part, may be considered income in the month received and therefore may be used in calculating the participant fee for that month.
( c ) Participant fees may be used for costs of operating the supportive housing or to assist supportive housing residents' move to permanent housing, and must have a therapeutic benefit.
( d ) In addition to a participant fee, recipients may charge residents reasonable fees for extracurricular services and activities (extracurricular fee) that participants are not required to receive under the terms of the grant award, are not paid for by VA per diem, or provided by VA. Extracurricular fees must be voluntary on the part of the participant.
( e ) In projects funded under this part where participants sign agreements, VA treats the costs associated with participant eviction to be as unallowable.
( f ) Use of participant agreements. ( 1 ) Participant agreements must be between the grant recipient of record and the program participant.
( 2 ) Participant agreements must be part of a therapeutic plan to increase self-determination and responsibility.
( 3 ) Participant agreements must include a clause that allows program participants the ability to break the lease or program agreement without penalty for medical or clinical necessity.
( 4 ) Participant agreements may not be used to exclude homeless veterans with little or no income from the program.
( 5 ) Participant agreements and conditions must be fully disclosed to potential participants and acknowledged in writing by both parties.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2011, 2012, 2061)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Day

# 									Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 27, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, please accept my best wishes as Saint Vincent and the Grenadines celebrates its 44th year of independence.

The United States is committed to its long-standing partnership with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. We are proud of our work together under the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative to address crime and violence and help support a safe, secure, and prosperous Caribbean. Going forward we are excited to collaborate on the U.S.-Caribbean Partnership to Address the Climate Crisis 2030 (PACC 2030), which will help Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and other countries in the region tackle one of the most pressing global challenges.

On this anniversary of your country’s Independence Day the United States hopes for a happy and prosperous year to come for all Vincentians.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 1263.2 Membership application requirements. ( a ) *Application.* Except as otherwise specified in this part, no institution may become a member of a Bank unless it has submitted to that Bank an application that satisfies the requirements of this part. The application shall include a written resolution or certification duly adopted by the applicant's board of directors, or by an individual with authority to act on behalf of the applicant's board of directors, of the following: ( 1 ) *Applicant review.* The applicant has reviewed the requirements of this part and, as required by this part, has provided to the best of its knowledge the most recent, accurate, and complete information available; and
( 2 ) *Duty to supplement.* The applicant will promptly supplement the application with any relevant information that comes to its attention prior to the Bank's decision on whether to approve or deny the application, and if the Bank's decision is appealed pursuant to § 1263.5, prior to resolution of any appeal by FHFA.
( b ) *Digest.* The Bank shall prepare a written digest for each applicant stating whether or not the applicant meets each of the requirements in §§ 1263.6 to 1263.19, the Bank's findings, and the reasons therefor. In preparing a digest for an applicant whose satisfaction of the membership eligibility requirements of § 1263.6(a) is contingent upon its meeting the definition of “insurance company” set forth in § 1263.1, the Bank shall state its conclusion as to whether the applicant meets that definition and summarize the bases for that conclusion. In preparing a digest for a non-federally-insured credit union applicant, the Bank shall summarize the manner in which the applicant has complied with the requirements of § 1263.19(a).
( c ) *File.* The Bank shall maintain a membership file for each applicant for at least three years after the Bank decides whether to approve or deny membership or, in the case of an appeal to FHFA, for three years after the resolution of the appeal. The membership file shall contain at a minimum: ( 1 ) *Digest.* The digest required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) *Required documents.* All documents required by §§ 1263.6 to 1263.19, including documents required to establish or rebut a presumption under this part, shall be described in and attached to the digest. The Bank is not required to retain in the file portions of regulatory financial reports that are not relevant to its decision on the membership application. If an applicant's appropriate regulator requires return or destruction of a regulatory examination report, the date that the report is returned or destroyed shall be noted in the file.
( 3 ) *Additional documents.* Any additional document submitted by the applicant, or otherwise obtained or generated by the Bank, concerning the applicant.
( 4 ) *Decision resolution.* The decision resolution described in § 1263.3(b).
[81 FR 3277, Jan. 20, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 25722, June 5, 2017]