alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2022111EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 111/11 |

---

Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/391/21 – Experts in technical support to Member States’ structural reforms and experts in the Schengen acquis (AD 7)

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 120 A of 8 April 2021](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2021_120_A_TOC)
)

(2022/C 111 A/09)

On page 6, Section 5 ‘Assessment centre’ should read:

‘(5)   
Assessment centre

A maximum of 3 times
 the number of successful candidates sought for each field will be invited to this phase. If you meet the eligibility requirements according to the data in your online application and if you scored one of the
highest overall marks
 for the selection based on qualifications, you will be invited to attend an assessment centre (online or in-person) over one or several days in your
language 2 (English or French)
. Please note that the written test in the field may be organised either in one of EPSO’s accredited test centres or remotely. Further details and instructions will be included in your invitation letter.

If the computer-based MCQ tests described in point 2 were
not organised upfront
, you will sit them during the assessment centre phase either in one of EPSO’s accredited centres or remotely. These tests are eliminatory and the marks obtained will not be added to the marks of the other assessment centre tests in the calculation of your total score.

Unless instructed otherwise, you will have to upload scanned copies of your supporting documents to your EPSO account. Further details and instructions will be included in your invitation letter.

Eight general competencies, as well as the field-related competencies required for the competition, will be tested at the assessment centre through
four tests
 as described in the following matrices:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Competency | Tests |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | Analysis and problem-solving | | Situational competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Communication | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 3. | Delivering quality and results | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 4. | Learning and development | | Situational competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 5. | Prioritising and organising | | Situational competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 6. | Resilience | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7. | Working with others | | General competency-based interview |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 8. | Leadership | | Situational competency-based interview |

Each general competency will be marked out of 10. There is no pass mark per competency. However, you must reach a pass mark of at least 40/80 in total.

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Competency | Test | Pass mark |
| Field-related competencies | Field-related interview | 25/50 |
| Written test in the field | 25/50’ |

---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Azerbaijan

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Azerbaijan			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Azerbaijan 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Azerbaijan

During the review period, budget documents were publicly available, including online.  They provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s revenues.  While budget documents did not fully disaggregate allocations to or earnings from state-owned enterprises, more detailed information was available through other public documents.  Audited financial statements for major state-owned enterprises were publicly available online.  Information in budget documents was generally reliable.  Information on debt obligations, including state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available and updated within a reasonable period.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and audited the government’s annual executed budget, and its reports were publicly available within a reasonable period.  The government partially specified in law or regulation the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  It is unclear if it followed those procedures in practice.  Basic information on such awards was made publicly available after contracts were awarded.  The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework and disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Azerbaijan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Specifying fully in law or regulation the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts; and
- Following applicable natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Azerbaijan 

Tags

AzerbaijanBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William J. Sandbrook, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Andretti Acquisition Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Omitted]; 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: March 17, 2022  By: /s/ William J. Sandbrook   **William J. Sandbrook**   **Co-Chief Executive Officer**   **(Principal Executive Officer)**
 
**
§ 1081.200 Commencement of proceeding and contents of notice of charges. ( a ) *Commencement of proceeding.* A proceeding governed by subparts A through D of this part is commenced when the Bureau, through the Office of Enforcement, files a notice of charges in accordance with § 1081.111. The notice of charges must be served by the Office of Enforcement upon the respondent in accordance with § 1081.113(d)(1).
( b ) *Contents of a notice of charges.* The notice of charges must set forth: ( 1 ) The legal authority for the proceeding and for the Bureau's jurisdiction over the proceeding;
( 2 ) A statement of the matters of fact and law showing that the Bureau is entitled to relief;
( 3 ) A proposed order or request for an order granting the relief sought;
( 4 ) The time and place of the hearing as required by law or regulation;
( 5 ) The time within which to file an answer as required by law or regulation;
( 6 ) That the answer must be filed and served in accordance with subpart A of this part; and
( 7 ) The docket number for the adjudication proceeding.
( c ) *Publication of notice of charges.* Unless otherwise ordered by the Director, the notice of charges will be given general circulation by release to the public, by publication on the Bureau's website and, where directed by the hearing officer or the Director, by publication in the Federal Register. The Bureau may publish any notice of charges after 14 days from the date of service except if there is a pending motion for a protective order filed pursuant to § 1081.119.
( d ) *Commencement of proceeding through a consent order.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, where the parties agree to settlement before the filing of a notice of charges, a proceeding may be commenced by filing a stipulation and consent order. The stipulation and consent order must be filed pursuant to § 1081.111. The stipulation must contain the information required under § 1081.120(d), and the consent order must contain the information required under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section. The proceeding will be concluded upon issuance of the consent order by the Director.
( e ) *Voluntary dismissal* — ( 1 ) *Without an order.* The Office of Enforcement may voluntarily dismiss an adjudication proceeding without an order entered by a hearing officer by filing either: ( i ) A notice of dismissal before the respondent(s) serves an answer; or
( ii ) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.
( 2 ) *Effect.* Unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice, and does not operate as an adjudication on the merits.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ GROVER W. PARROTT, Claimant

- Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1728

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 19

- 371, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch, Judge William S. Greenberg , Judge Joseph L. Falvey

, Jr

.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID S COTT J ELSMA , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Denver, CO, argued for claimant

- appellant. Also represented by T HOMAS W. S TOEVER
, J R

.

R ETA E MMA B EZAK , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by J EFFREY B. C LARK
, C LAUDIA B URKE , R OBERT E DWARD K IRSCHMAN
, J R

. ; A MANDA B LACKMON
, B RIAN D. Case: 20-1728 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 01/06/2021G RIFFIN , Offi ce of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Washington, DC

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST
, Chief Judge

, T ARAN TO and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 6, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-1728 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 01/06/2021
§ 71.30 Reassessment of Eligible Veterans and Family Caregivers. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the eligible veteran and Family Caregiver will be reassessed by VA (in collaboration with the primary care team to the maximum extent practicable) on an annual basis to determine their continued eligibility for participation in PCAFC under this part. Reassessments will include consideration of whether the eligible veteran is unable to self-sustain in the community for purposes of the monthly stipend rate under § 71.40(c)(4)(i)(A). Reassessment may include a visit to the eligible veteran's home.
( b ) Reassessments may occur more frequently than annually if a determination is made and documented by VA that more frequent reassessment is appropriate.
( c ) Reassessments may occur on a less than annual basis if a determination is made and documented by VA that an annual reassessment is unnecessary.
( d ) Failure of the eligible veteran or Family Caregiver to participate in any reassessment pursuant to this section will result in revocation pursuant to § 71.45, Revocation and Discharge of Family Caregivers.
( e ) ( 1 ) If the eligible veteran meets the requirements of § 71.20(b) or (c) (*i.e.,* is a legacy participant or a legacy applicant), the eligible veteran and Family Caregiver will be reassessed by VA (in collaboration with the primary care team to the maximum extent practicable) within the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2020 to determine whether the eligible veteran meets the requirements of § 71.20(a). This reassessment may include a visit to the eligible veteran's home. If the eligible veteran meets the requirements of § 71.20(a), the reassessment will consider whether the eligible veteran is unable to self-sustain in the community for purposes of the monthly stipend rate under § 71.40(c)(4)(i)(A).
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(1) of this section, a reassessment will not be completed under paragraph (e)(1) if at some point before a reassessment is completed during the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2020 the individual no longer meets the requirements of § 71.20(b) or (c).
[85 FR 46296, July 31, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 52618, Sept. 22, 2021; 87 FR 57608, Sept. 21, 2022]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                    FORM 10QA

       (X)    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

              For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1995

                                       or

       ( )    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
                         Commission File Number 0-12194

                                ZITEL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



           California                                      94-2566313
   (State or other jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
   incorporation or organization)                     Identification No.)

      47211 Bayside Parkway                                94538-6517
       Fremont, California                                 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (510) 440-9600


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes  X  No 
                      ---    ----

The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of December
31, 1995 was 7,297,187.

<PAGE>

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

           (a)  Exhibit  10.28 - Series A  Preferred  Stock  Purchase  Agreement
between  the  Company  and  MatriDigm   Corporation  dated  November  17,  1995.
(Confidential  treatment has been  requested  for a portion of this exhibit. The
confidential portion has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.)

           (b) No reports on Form 8-K were filed  during the  quarter  for which
this report is filed.





                                     Page 2


<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  Registrant
has duly  caused  this  report  to be signed  on its  behalf by the  undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.


                                          ZITEL CORPORATION              
                                    
                                    
Date:  December 16, 1996                  Henry C. Harris
                                          Henry C. Harris
                                          Vice President, Finance &
                                          Administration
                                          (Chief Financial and
                                          Accounting Officer)
                                    
                                    
                            



                                     Page 3
# C_2021334EN.01000701.xml

| 20.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 August 2021

(2021/C 334/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1696 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85523 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2798 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0723 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5450 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,501 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 350,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5832 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9295 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,9731 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6319 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4919 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1121 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7101 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5942 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 375,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7504 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5901 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5028 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 922,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9573 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,084 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,7175 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,994 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3662 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5852 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,9975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1696

JPY

Japanese yen

128,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85523

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2798

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0723

ISK

Iceland króna

148,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5450

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,501

HUF

Hungarian forint

350,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5832

RON

Romanian leu

4,9295

TRY

Turkish lira

9,9731

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6319

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4919

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1121

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7101

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5942

KRW

South Korean won

1 375,34

ZAR

South African rand

17,7504

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5901

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5028

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 922,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9573

PHP

Philippine peso

59,084

RUB

Russian rouble

86,7175

THB

Thai baht

38,994

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3662

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5852

INR

Indian rupee

86,9975

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3210

___________ William Calhoun, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Wal-Mart, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 31, 2009 Filed: August 5, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William Calhoun appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his employmentdiscrimination suit, in part because he failed to disclose the action in bankruptcy filings. Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion in the application of judicial estoppel to Calhoun’s claim. See Stallings v. Hussmann Corp. , 447 F.3d 1041, 1046 (8th Cir. 2006) (s tandard of review). Wedecline Calhoun’s request to modify the dismissal to be without prejudi ce, given that a without-prejudice dismissal-2- would serve no purpose because Calhoun is es topped from pursuing his action in the future. See Paulucci v. City of Duluth , 826 F.2d 780, 782-83 (8th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559 

AN ACT 

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2559 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Higher Edu3 cation Extension Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS. 

5 Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act 

6 of 2005 (Public Law 109–81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘Oc8 tober 31, 2007’’. 

9 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

10 Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Ex11 tension Act of 2005 as amended by this Act, shall be con12 strued to limit or otherwise alter the authorizations of ap13 propriations for, or the durations of, programs contained 

14 in the amendments made by the Higher Education Rec15 onciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–171) to the pro16 visions of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Tax17 payer-Teacher Protection Act of 2004. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559 

AN ACT 

To temporarily extend the programs under the 

purposes. Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other