• The seasonal migration of bovines towards the mountains looking for 

food reduces the time for closing and vaccinate the animals in plains. 

• A long season of intense rains limits the period of implementation of the 

campaign. 

• Rivers overflow in the zone, forming marshlands which prevent the entry 

in the area during long periods of time as there are no roads. 

• A long drought period when animals are in bad health, so vaccination is 

not suitable. 

b. Epidemiological aspects. 

• Extensive grazing livestock of familiar subsistence with self-consumption 

production. 

• Low livestock density (one bovine average each 30 hectares), 

consequently there is a low contact rate between susceptible animals. 

• Very few animal movement, specially of those that will be sent for local 

slaughterhouses. There is not animal flow towards other provinces. 

• Historically, a low occurrence of the disease in these provinces (San 

Juan S/P, La Rioja, 1985. Catamarca and Jujuy, 1991; Salta, 2003, 

without occurrence since 1993, and Mendoza 2001, without occurrence 

since 1990). 

This strategy is similar to the one implemented in the nineties which helps to 

prevent outbreaks at national level during five years (1995/1999). 

• In the Border Control Plan area unlike the rest of the free zone, all 

susceptible domestic species that are vaccinated are individually 
identified with ear tags. The vaccination is official, and the costs of 

the vaccines and operations are met by the govemment. Regional 

supervisors, SENASA veterinarians and hired vaccinators are 

responsible of the operative actions. 

Although the vaccination periods of each Local Plan lasts between 60 and 

120 days, each first or second vaccination period at national level, lasts 

almost SIX MONTHS each. 

CAMPAIGNS IMPLEMENTATION 

The Local Entities of Sanitary struggles are responsible for the 

implementation of the vaccination campaigns. The minutes of FMD and 

brucellosis vaccination, with an affidavit nature, provides evidence for the 

vaccination on behalf of the Local Plan staff. The minutes are issued in 

triplicate, the original is handed over to the owner and/or the people who is 

responsible for the vaccinated animals, the third copy is for the Local Plan 

and the second copy for the Local Office. The second copy is used to 

produce the reports every two weeks on the vaccinations that is carried out. 

SENASA pass on Local Entities of Sanitary Struggle the responsibility of 

implementing vaccination campaigns through the Secretariat of Agriculture, 

Livestock, Fisheries and Food Resolution N° 108/01. 

Each district located within the systematic vaccination area in the country 

have its Local Vaccination Plan. This Plan is produced by the respective 

Local Sanitary Entity and submitted to COPROSA (Provincial Animal Health 

Commiftees) for approval. After COPROSA's approval it is sent to CONALFA 
(National Committee of Struggle against FIVlD) and to SENASA for the 

definitive approval. 

The 361 Vaccination Plans of the country, with their 5900 agents and 

supervised and controlled by SENASA, are responsible for the 

implementation of the vaccination. 

The schedule establishes the required vaccination quantity for each Plan 

every two weeks, to be able to vaccinate all the bovines of its jurisdiction, 

within the period stipulated by SENASA. 

VACCINATION SCHEDULE 

Before each vaccination campaign starts, SENASA jointly with the respective 

COPROSAS and CONALFA, establishes the dates when each Local Plan in 

the country will perform the vaccination. This period may extend 60 or 90 

days depending on the province or region. 

The dates of each Local Plan are different according to production and 

climatic features, as well as the dynamics of animals movement in each 

region, in order to meet an extensive coverage and a higher and more 

constant immunity throughout the year. 

48. How do your future plans and strategies for eradicating FMD 

determfne your vaccination polfcies? (e.g. when to vaccinate, which 

animals, how many times a year, what seasons of the year), and What 

are your vaccination plans in the region for the next 3 years? 
Going on with livestock systematic vaccination, and vaccinating twice a year 

bovines younger than 2 years old, and once a year adult bovines (elder than 

2 years old). Furthermore, there are projects to widen free vaccination areas. 

49. A/so, please give details on record keeping practices in the 

vaccination program, including the type of vaccine being used. 

The vaccinator paticipating in the Local Sanitary Entity Operative Team 

perForms the vaccination in the establishment. He should agree previously 

with the animals' owner. Then, he issues the Vaccination Minutes where he 

reports all data regarding the vaccination (date, type of vaccination used, 

vaccinated animals by category, and the data regarding the animals' owner) 

and is signed by both the owner and vaccinator. 

These Vaccination Minutes are the basic sources of information, as the data 

are recorded in the SENASA Local Office computer system. 

From these reports data the "VACCINATION CAMPAIGNS MONITORING" 

(Resolution N° 815/02) is developed, which is formed by 8 statements sent 

by each Local Office to the specific Office of the Epidemiologic Management. 

At the beginning of the period the N° 1 STATEMENT (beginning) is sent and 

then successively from N° 2 STATEMENT up to N° 7, every 15 days, up to 

the end, when N° 8 STATEMENT is sent (close). This system, in force since 

the 2002 second campaigns, has the advantages of producing more 

accurate data along with its organization. 

The vaccine used in the vaccination campaigns is produced with oily 

coadjutor and saponine, which enlarges the animal immunity period, of 
almost 180 days in the first applications and of 360 days as from the fourth 

application. 

It is rendered inactive with binary ethylenine, being tetravalent, as it has the 

Fields 01 Virus, Cruzeiro A24, A2000 Argentina and A2001 Argentina, in its 

antigen mass. 

50. What system is /n p/ace to ensure that all animals are vacc/nated? 

Before starting the vaccination campaign, each Local Plan establishes the 

number of animals as follows: 

15 days before the beginning of the vaccination period each SENASA Local 

Veterinarian issues a complete list of producers and the number of 

animals they have, through the 'Sanitary Management System' that all 

Local Offices computers have. 

The number is formed by: 

® N° OF BOVINES VACCINATED IN THE LAST CAMPAIGN 

+ 

N° OF INGOING BOVINES 

(Since the end of the last campaign) 

13ASE 

~ llE 

DA'CA 

• S.G.S. DATABASE 

• N° OF OUTGOING BOVINES 

(Since the end of the last campaign) 

~ •-~ ~ :• 

~ 
This is an ebauuto nunnber neuordod for eanh pnoduoer in tha SGS, and 

ahou|d ba aduuted to 'ESTl0lATED'dats. asthero ono ahuodonwin emoh 

eatab|ishmantnotnacondad in tha oyubonnbebwoen oannpaignmwhich modih/ 

• 'S.G.E.'BOVlWESSTOCK RECOROED.(1) 

(Abnn|ubanun~o»r) 

• N"OFCALVESB0R0S|NCETHELASTCAK0P/\|GN I. 

(EstimatetfiQunaaddedtotheproviousnumbar) 

- 

~ 

~ N"OFCALVESDEADS{NCETHELASTCAK8PA|GN ' 

Aaasumwewr 

oowouorco 

aYr*E 

SENASA 

vErsn/wAn, 

xmo 

uuaw/rrsoTo 

ryspLAw1s 

oAvo ospoxc 

r*s 

asG/ww/wu 

numbermported thmughthe'nP1USTby theSENASA Loca|Vetehnarian 

and the Loca| Pban head to the Epidomology Oepartment on the 

veocinabon rma1 beginning day. Thefortnightdeve|oprnentia reported 

thrmugh'L|STS2TO7' ' thathavethedmtuofthevnodnetioncorriodmud 

duhnQthefortniQht(canopaigns monihohngandasseosrnant). Thio is used 

usbaoiatornonihorthonompaignandmeaaureitofina|neau|t. 
The ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BOVINES TO BE VACCINATED is the 

reference figure to be compared with the NUMBER OF BOVINES 

VACCINATED by the Local Plan every two weeks (reported in the 

Monitoring Statements N° 2 to N° 7). This allows to determine the 

'development percentage of the Vaccine', and know whether the 

vaccination course is suitable. 

When the campaign is over, the NUMBER OF VACCINATED BOVINES is 

compared with the 'ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BOVINES TO BE 

VACCINATED DURING THE CAMPAIGN'. The following situations may 

result: 

• EQUAL: when the estimated number agrees with the number of bovines 

finally vaccinated. 

• HIGHER: when the estimated data were lower than the real numbers. 

E.G. a lower number of bom calves was estimated. 

• LOWER: when the estimated data were higher to the real numbers. 

E.G. a higher number of born calves was estimated or the animals 

movement to be slaughtered have a negative influence on slaughter 

movements since the list was done. 

THIS RESULT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE VACCINATION HAS 

BEEN DEVELOPED UNDER THE REAL EXISTING STOCK. 

When the campaign is over, the SENASA Local Veterinary verifies whether 

all producers recorded in the Local Office Sanitary Management System 

have vaccinated their bovines. 

51. Are vaccina#ed animals iden#ifieo' in a permanent manner? 
No, only the animals included in the Border Control Plan. 

52. What is the pena/ty if an orvner does not vaccinate? 

In case a producer failed to perForm his sanitary obligation, the Local 

Veterinary draws up the corresponding minutes stating the result of his 

inspection, bans the holding and the movements within it and calls on him to 

develop the vaccination immediately. 

53. P/ease provide any data on verification of vaccination activities by 

the offscal services and on compllance rates for the past 5 years. 

SENASA Resolution N° 623/02 establishes the duties and responsibilities of 

the Operative Group members, and how they have to perform their duties. 

An strict control on the actions performed by each member of this group is 

carried out both by the Technical Committee members and the SENASA 

Local Veterinary. 

The SENASA Resolution N° 33/02 establishes the audits that the SENASA 

Local Veterinary of the jurisdiction should develop on the Local Plan, 

particularly on the operative group activities, throughout the campaigns. This 

resolutions approves a Procedures Manual and a form for the audit on the 

Vaccination Plans. The official veterinary should control the vaccination 

conditions, the set of instruments used, the schedule, the vaccination 

compliance, sanitary news, data, biosecurity measures. 
54. What is the tota/ population that is not vaccinated? 

The area where the FMD Vaccination Plan is not performed includes the 

provinces of Neuquen, Rio Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz and Tierra del Fuego, 

with a bovine stock of almost 340.000 animals. 

With regards to the northern zone of the country, where the FMD Systematic 

Vaccination Plan is applied, sheep, pigs, goats and camelids are not 

vaccinated, excepting the Border Control Plan, where all susceptible species 

are massive and systematically vaccinated. 

55. Are vaccinated anirrtals allowed to move into the zone where 

vaccination is not practiced? If not, what restrictions are imposed to 

prevent such movement? 

SENASA Resolution N° 1051/02 (see Annex VI) bans the introduction of live 

animals of FMD susceptible species of any origin, condition and destination, 

into the 'Free FMD Area where Vaccination is not practised' and into the 

'Surveillance Zone where Vaccination is not practised', in compliance with 

the cun-ent indications of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE). 

56. How is compliance monitored or enforced? 

See question What geographic barriers or regulatory measures exist to 

contro/ ani nal movement between the vaccination and non-vaccination 

zones? 
57. Is active surveillance done in non-vaccination provinces that border 

the zone of vaccination? 

The provinces where vaccination is not practised and that border the zone of 

vaccination are Neuquen and part of the province of Rio Negro, just south of 

Rio Negro river; both form a particular region, Northern Patagonia B created 

as surveillance area of the free area where vaccination is not practised 

(Southern Patagonia). 

The active surveillance activities carried out in this zone include serological 

samples and inspections to establishments and coldstores. With regards to 

the serological samples this zone is considered in the stratification 

developed for these systematic studies that are conducted annually (see 

Annex IV Samples). 

In 2001, an special serological study was conducted in this zone and in 

southern Patagonia due to the sanitary barrier end in 2000, after Argentina 

attained the FMD free country condition. As a result of the 2001 and 2002 

outbreaks, the study focused on detecting the virus activity in the region, and 

furthermore, on those establishments where animals were introduced from 

the north of Rio Negro river when the restrictions ended. These studies 

showed the absence of virus activity in this zone, keeping the FMD free 

condition in spite of the outbreaks in other zones. 

The inspections that are carried out in the establishments in this zone are 

included within the sanitary programs activities of some diseases, being 

more intensive in this zone the activities related to the sheep scabies, due to 

the wide predominance of this disease. Inspections in coldstores include 

both ovine and bovine species. 
58. The po/yvalent vaccine contafns serotype O, and subtypes A24, 

A2000, and A2001 have been used. Have any studies been done on 

cross reactivity between A24, A2000, and A2001 subtypes? Was the 

vaccine tested for efficacy against A2000 and A2001 using 

combinations of subtype A? 

Crossed protection tests in bovines has been carried out and their result was 

that A 24 strain ofFers a protection of 30% when challenged with the A 2001 

strain or A 2000 strain, due to these results it was decided to add these 

strains to the vaccine formulation. 

CROSSED IMMUNITY SURVEY IN BOVINES UIT VIRAL CHALLENGE OF A 

2001 STRAIN 

The SENASA official laboratory carries out the permanent characterization of all 

the FMD virus samples acting in the field, as part of its diagnosis routine. 

This serological follow-up has allowed the identification of two field virus A 

subtypes different from the regional A24 prototype vaccinal strains and from 

Argentina A87 and A79, as well as being different among them. 

This strains were called A2000 y A 2001.- 

Field samples MC 38796 from Gral Villegas, Province of Buenos Aires were 

taken as virus A 2000 prototype and field samples MC 267 from Trenque 

Lauquen, province of Buenos Aires, as virus A 2001.- 
Complement Fixation 50% studies (CF 50%) against a Hyperimmune sera (HS) 

of Virus A for subtyping allowed inferring that they were two subtypes 

serologically difFerent, which was confirmed after carrying out relations and 

kinship tests according to the CPFA procedures manual. - 

These studies determined the following kinship values: 

A 2000 against A 24 Cruzeiro R=32% 

A 2001 against 24 Cruzeiro R=51% 

A 2001 against A 2000 R=36% 

These results allow concluding that they are two serologically different 

serotypes. 

They were also verified when studying the samples in front of a Monoclonal 

Antibodies Panel (See attached report).- 

The genomic sequencing of this samples established that A 2000 and A 2001 

strains were samples that belonged to different lineage. (See attached report). 

Wth the aim of performing crossed immunity studies, three monovalent oil 

vaccines of strains A 24 Cruzeiro, A 2000 and A 2001 were formulated, with 

similar antigen mass and 10 virgin bovines were vaccinated with each formula. 

A fourth group vaccinated with a 01 Campos, A 24 Cruzeiro and A 2000 vaccine 

formula was included.- 
The results of this test were the following: 

• Bovines vaccinated with A 24 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV 

with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 

2001: 30% Protection.- 

• Bovines vaccinated with A 2000 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 

DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of 

Virus A 2001: 0% Protection 

• Bovines vaccinated with A 2001 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 

DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of 

Virus A 2001: 80% Protection.- 

• Bovines vaccinated with 01 Campos, A 24 Cruzeiro and A 2000 trivalent 

vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting 

Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 2001: 50% Protection.- 

Studies performed before crossed immunity in bovines of A 24 and A 2000 

monovalent vaccines at 30 DPV gave a protection of 30% and 90% 

respectively, against viral challenge with A 2000. 

Conclusions: 

In view of the results obtained in the laboratory and crossed immunity in 

bovines responses, we conclude that there are significant difFerences between 

the strain acting in the field and the reference vaccine strains.- 
The protection given by vaccines formulated with A 24 Cruzeiro alone or 

associated is not enough in animals vaccinated for the first time, although it 

is known that protection in revaccinated animals is satisfactory 

Separation from adjacent regions of higher risk through 

physical or other barriers 

59. P/ease describe in more detail any existing geographic or physical 

barriers to the spread of FMD from other countries. Are there sha/low 

points on rivers, specially during the dry season, or unfenced areas on 

land where livestock can cross into Argentina from neighboring 

courtA-fes? 

Argentine borders are very extensive and they are formed mostly by 

geographic barriers (rivers, mountains, oceans), which form solid natural 

barriers that allow to implement prevention and control measures in those 

points of contact through bridges or crossings, where there is official staff. 

There some land borders and some fordable river courses that have been 

explained in the report already sent, where animals may cross borders 

looking for better pastures. 

Consequently sanitary risks are reduced in the higher risk zones as the 

border with Bolivia and Paraguay (62 per cent of the dried borders) through 

the activities included in the Border Control Plan with vaccination and 

identification of all susceptible animals along with coordinated activities with 

neighboring countries services and the active involvement of other official 

entities and security forces in border zones. 
G[i P&*cse mA* ~ oribxe /nore ym/ly thue gmogmaph/c emtent atid an/n/m/ 

of' Lhm wycc/matiOm U-nd 1-Ymn-wacclfmntion zmnes Ailsx» 

p/aaoe ceaoribe desun/e0an*maoeRnmaotio,ecfonpege 70, inc/umivg 

anymaps, 

The vamcinodun zono indudea aU Uhe zonea whena tha FK8D mysteniahc 

pnogrannisinfo/ceUhroughoudthecounhy. 

!t indudes the provincos of Jujuy. Ga!ta, Ce\anarca, La Rioia, Tuoumio. 

Saniiayo del Eute/o ` Saniu Fe. Co/hontao. ;Viiaionuo. Eoba R[ou, C6nJobu, 

BuenooAinea. La Pampa, San Juan ^ San Luia, yNendoze and som* noDiona 

ufRioNegouawdNeuqu6n, 

R[o Negm river and U)* N*u4u6n bo/de/ foxn the aouthem, burdar. 

aepuraiiog Lhio zooe 0om a vameinaiion on*u thai indudeu the oeat uTiha 

p/ovinoea oT Rio Neg/o aod Neuquen. ca ||ed Northa/n PutuAuoie B. aod 

oer/iee uuinu/vei||anoo ao(iviiieu Ti -i\uzune axienJu up'Lo e FKAD ifee araa 

vvhore vaodnmtion h notpreciiaed thst has been recogn/ze6 by ()|E (K8ay. 

2002) aoJ inu{udes ihe prnvinoey uf ChubuL Suobe Cruz unu' Tie/oy JeI 

FLjegO 

Aonex Differe/3 amni(ary, cundiUono damogeph`a and n*gimna rogardinQ 

FiWU. 

6t N/Ial gowgnephic &anienn mrnegu1ahory nnwasunms oyist to contro/ 

dnl Ina/000me11JUM UULWeeii theveuuH/aVunaildnmn-oamoi riaElonzmnemr ~ 
SENASA Resdudon N^ 58X01. additiunsd reAu|mhons and SENASA 

Reso|uhon N" 10E1/02 euLaNish reQu|ahory n-ieosunoo banning Uhe 

introduo\ionofauauepbbh*eninia}afromnun-vaoohationzonos 

Tha^e aoe \and uhed`pusta a\oogihe oa1u/u| uouroea ofBaoanoaa. Ljmay 

ond Riu Neg/o dvero, eawe!| aa Uxed uont/u| puutaon at/ategio/oadu end 

62. kA117at was the putpmse and eMect mfResolwWrm 9/200 11, which 

I'Fmpf uwneTI&»damamiim,ybmwiet , inpmmai'iel420—F 

The FMDoutbweakogewy/iseto Ne SEN.' ~ SARaaolti6on N»y dated Marcli 

28. 2001. e-estaNiahingiheuonbo|pooio io ParmUe|42. min -iinga\keeping 

!he FN1Darea whem vaooinahun is notpraofieed. AMomwardn, this neso|uUon 

waa ebnogo ~ad by 8ENASA Reso/ubon N" 2J. oeobon 4. duied Aph/ 2G. 

2001.whichwesintum ebo|ishedbySENAS/\Resu|uhon N^58. dated K8uy 

24.2OU1.ounentk/infurno. 

|n a/| camea theae regu!ationo hava been approved lo nupport, keep and 

o'L/eog1hao il-iayaolia/y bania/a000t/o|a{o Paxo||e|42. 

KA ~V~/~~N~~cr~ boio ~~~~~~~~>~ a-uld hY~ ' 

Anove0N_-I'1s 

63 ~ Wbemeaam-esmminiflace6mpmweeit of-ossiriggs at 

pm~~ (~~e~ ~an 6mndar ~m~~~ w~ Aend mr w'~ei~ M~ai ~~vm~s 
tivestocac frotn be;ng brought acros.s the ritreis ot, e-outes betvveert 

_ 

~:a~iecii No®iiis <., 

Sanitary barr,'ers were estabiishecl arriong the different reyions te preEaent crossings 

o+ .,to .,thor th hnr.'a. t v r,:t~ r,tr t f h!' L. .. ~ 1 r. thE ~. 1 .3~~~ ~ ~ .,~ En ., ~ Er p^.CS S. 2 ~~~ r`~ ..., ~~ ~ .^,2 p.OS S.r ~,~ ., ES.z...,tS ~~ E.. ., ~~ 

borders. located on strateglc places, tiqith trained staft during a!1 day 1ong. 

Interaction v,+ith security forces, by assistance and cooperation agreements, shall hP 

summed up to the controis. 

Regarding the Band hordErs most of thern have natura9 barriers, forming a physicai 

separation that reduces risk factors. 

ln the sectors where there are no natural barriers, the control mechanisms 

include strategic checks, mobile patrols and a permanent coordination writh 

ryationa; or provincia! entities %Anth constant presence at route controis 

throughout the nationail territory. 

RRGENTlNE RBRtlBLdC BOR®ERS 

Tota9 Bord®rs :t:31: 34096 

Protect-ed Brarders 

Sea Ceasfs Bordeis krii. 

.Fiuvial Bor ders km: 

A9ountain Borders nm: 

t,.9npa otected Bordea°s 

Us"ii7rotEcted Bordcrs nnn: 

4675 kt-n (v3%) 

341 8R krri (25%) 

4v91 krn (33°'0) 

s ~ J,~ : qa;

~ ~

~ 

i~~ d r.ii ~ ( ~ 

BORL;ERS 

n.__ ~~ i '___a ~ .._ rt__.. t_~ ~

'

_ DICL13 rCUC![1LIdC RCfJUUlIG 

sotal Boreaers kn -i: 1079 kir! 
KmunfluvialbonJars: 1092km 

-OnUruguayhvor 805km 

-[)nPapiriQuazCi/ivec 134km 

-OnSunAntoniohvac 94km 

-Oo|yuuz6hver. 129km 

Uop^u1eoG»d|andbnrdem ~ 27km 

B Yhgmyenzona: 27km 

Uruguay 

TotalBo/demkrn. Uhhhn-i 

KmonOuvia\burders: 86Gkm 

-OoUruguaylivec 49 1 'rlin 

Paraguay 

/oe/uoroenaxn'. u'vwn 

Kmonfluvia|hurdans: 1185km 

-{}n Panend/iva/. 630km 

On Peregueyhv*r 290km 

-On Pi|oomoyohvec 265ko-i 

Kmonunpnofooted|andbordes 2,85 km 

-PUoomayohveruhanQeduuuroe 

(Panta|ifinpxojaot) km 

Bo|ivieRepubUo 

Toiu| Burdera kno. 765 km 
Kmoniluvia|bordee ~ 386km 

~ On PUoumuyurivor 40km 

C)nQrandadaTahjahvoc 120km 

-OnBonnejuhmyr 126km 

-[}nminorhvercuum*a(fordab|ohvera): 100km 

Bondemununpnotoctodlandbondero: 380km 

'PunaandAkip1anoregion ~ 385km 

Chik»RepubUu 

TotadBordo/okm ~ 4591 km 

Kmunmounhainbordem, 4001 km 

-OnthoAndeerange: 4091km 

Kmununproteu!ed|andbondero: 380km. 

-Southom/egiun: 500km 

BorderpoyuapprmedbySENASA 

Landposte:2O 

" Chi!e border- 8 

~ UruAuaybordec 3 

° Bruzi|border ~ G 

° Puraguaybordec 3 

~ Bu|iviabordar 3 

F|uvia|, sea and airporty. 24 

F|uviaKeeopoah ~ 18 

|n|ennadona|airports ~ 6 
64.Qmyouhave any esbmatemoonoerning the amoant and freqtimmcy 

cfoneudhorizedcrmmain&s betwemmcheok points? 

M is impossible tu d*tennine Uhis amount aa b is Ulega| traffic bd tha 

maoauras mendoned in the previouo anovvecy ainn ot reducing the hok of 

suaooptib|aanima|oorpnoductsiUaga|inboduotion. 

Al| nej*obuna ufin1pnrta ^yoorde6 duhnQ 2001120021'2003 and2O04 (up to 

Uho pneoenU aoe ehovved (n dhe A0NEX \U!i abng vxith the neoson ofUhe 

importoroniryrsjevUon 

Thay ae coniro| pos1y auGhorized by SENASA for formign kade, that 

harmonize wjth noighbohng counthea and aU ihe uonbn| and aupamisinn 

actividos anm oani*d uui by th* Son/iue ofDoia" eta/l 

tke lovver nahe border onuoainga, 

harmuniZed wiih non aothorized couniries for pnmdocta moniimned by 
SENA3A. Thore oOher bondar audhorbies and nigratury oonbois in dneye 

postasinnathayeroouthohzadforpeopkemow*mont. 

|n thene coaos` contro|n ofpanaangem entry ann oonductud by borderguaod 

authohtieo (Nabuno| Bondnr Po|ice or Nadona\ Navy)who inspeut if 

passangens cany ausoepUb|e anin1ua ur vage1al or unima| proUucts 

66.YuunmmnbnnmdthatFMD-smmoeptible an|nomkoaraaUAomedentryafterm 

quarantine period at the officia| quarantine fani/by. Please o|arify the 

querantine requirennants and demcribe ony&emt p/ouedureafmrirnpurted 

vacoinaton? 

The onime|s knpnrted are p|aned ond*r quoronbno in tho axpurUng counhy. 

b*foreentehngtotheRopub|kcofArgentinu.Thenonddionsnyquinadnoganding 

FN1D, ane ihoee recnrnmended by the VVndd Organieation hor Anima| Heo|1h 

Countries o/ zonea exporting bnvnao on dhe hoof (Umguayend Brazi Canada 

und USA— up to 2002 and 2003 reopecdvek), ahaop mnd goata on the hoof 

(Uruguuy.Austra|iaandChi|e),poncineoonUhehoof(UruAuayandBnuzi|).deer 

nn the hoof (Novv Zea|and ond Chi\o). and ||amos on the huof (Chi|a) are 

nacugnizad aa FKADfree counthsa orzunaa whure vacoinabon is not pnactioyd 
Unce thoy enterthe Repu@ic ofArgentinu. anima|o intendad to breeding 

(bovnes/bube|inea. yheep, goato, pigo) corry outtha pon| entry quarantno in 

tha QuanonUne Lezansto Cepda| Pn*misea. |n tho cese ofnuminen1 bnoedons ` 

ooming from KAERCOSUR, they can undorQo quarondna outside the Of5cia| 

Lazareto. \n uf5oia|h/ approved pnaooises, underthe supen/ieion of tha SENASA 

Lona|Vatahnahan.dopandingonopanadvanaaaonsandthenumberofinvo1ved 

\n a(|thecoseu. this period |asta un@ aUthatasts treatment, andvaccinoUon 

Aocurding bn 8he abuvo'nnenUoned. duhnA Uhe 2002-2004 pehod. only FKAD 

susoopdb(o anima|o noning from FK8D fnao cuunthea urzonea (wbh orvvdhuut 

vaocinabon)huveentenadU1eRepubUuofArgenUna.|ntheoecaoea.andtaking 

into anoount the currnnt stmtus ofthe RepubUc ofArgendnm. no teota negonding 

thisdioaaaoanouanieduut.aanecummondedbythe0E. 

DuhngthequarantnainArgonhno.thaanhna|smvowycoinoh»duoingtheotrn\ne 

conasponding &o dhe No\iona| P!en, ifdhoirfina| deadnabon in ouroounUY ia a 

zonowhorevacdnotinn is pneoticed. On the onntnary, enima|o knbyndedtothe 

aouth of panoUe| 42^ are authohzed 8u enter in a dino/t thp ur by eir hnm the 

Ezoiza|ntennationa|Ajrportbz1heesdebUshmentofdeytinmdon. 

SENASARasoludon N° 1354/94(seeAnnexVA ^ reyarding Uveaninla|simpod