alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 302/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.302.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5318 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.302.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 302

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5318 November 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 of 12 November 2010 on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 of 12 November 2010 on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 1209.70 Scope.

Subpart D of this part contains rules governing practice by parties or their representatives before FHFA. This subpart addresses the imposition of sanctions by the presiding officer or the Director against parties or their representatives in an adjudicatory proceeding under this part. This subpart also covers other disciplinary sanctions—censure, suspension, or disbarment—against individuals who appear before FHFA in a representational capacity either in an adjudicatory proceeding under this part or in any other matters connected with presentations to FHFA relating to a client's or other principal's rights, privileges, or liabilities. This representation includes, but is not limited to, the practice of attorneys and accountants. Employees of FHFA are not subject to disciplinary proceedings under this subpart.
42130.

#### SIMS, Administrator v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY.

*257Argued July 5, 1966

Decided September 6, 1966.

*Donald E. Austin,*for appellant.

*Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams & Levy, Frank W. Seiler, Walter C. Hartridge, II,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The applicable tariff is as follows: “All station equipment and station wiring, other than any equipment necessary for the suitable termination of the channel facilities on the customer’s premises and other than the control equipment for reversals effected by the customer, referred to in B. 1. c. (2) (a) (I), and other than equipment referred to in D. 4. following, shall be provided by the customer. Program *258channel wiring on the property owned or leased by the customer and upon which the station is located may be included as station wiring . . .” “Premises” is defined in the tariffs before the court on this motion as follows: “The term ‘Premises’ denotes the space occupied by a customer or authorized user when in a building or buildings on contiguous property (except railroad rights of way, etc.) not separated by a public highway.” Each side presented an affidavit attempting to support its construction of the tariff as to the meaning of “premises.” These affidavits are irrelevant. The definition of “premises” stated in the tariff is plain and unambiguous and not subject to construction. It is plain and indisputable that “premises” as used in the tariff refers to a space in one or more buildings and cannot by any stretch of the imagination be construed to mean space reaching from a telephone booth on one side of a public street to the mobile unit of the Coastal Broadcasting Company, Inc. on the other side of the street.

Since the duties of the appellee ceased upon the company’s completion of its preparing the facilities in the telephone booth to carry the broadcast of the customer after the customer had connected its broadcasting unit to the appellee’s wiring in the telephone booth, whatever the telephone company’s agents might have done to assist the company’s customer in stretching the wire from the telephone booth to the broadcasting mobile truck was outside the scope of the authority of the agents and the company as previously held.

The court did not err in granting the summary judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
#### § 1271.1 Definitions.

Unless otherwise defined in this subpart, the terms used in this subpart shall conform, in the following order, to: Regulations of FHFA, the Uniform Commercial Code, regulations of the Federal Reserve System, and general banking usage. As used in this subpart:

*Account processing* includes charging, crediting, and settling of member or eligible institution accounts, excluding individual customer accounts.

*Assets* includes furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, and capitalized start-up costs.

*Data communication* means transmitting and receiving of data to or from Banks, Federal Reserve offices, clearinghouse associations, depository institutions or their service bureaus, and other direct sending entities; arrangement for delivery of information; and telephone inquiry service.

*Data processing* includes capture, storage, and assembling of, and computation of, data from payment instruments received from Federal Reserve offices, Banks, clearinghouse associations, depository institutions, and other direct lending entities.

*Eligible institution* means any institution that is eligible to make application to become a member of a Bank under section 4 of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1424), including any building and loan association, savings and loan association, cooperative bank, homestead association, insurance company, savings bank, community development financial institution, or any insured depository institution (as defined in section 2(9) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1422(9))), regardless of whether the institution applies for or would be approved for membership.

*Issuance of forms* means the designation and distribution of standardized forms for use in collection, processing, and settlement services.

*Presentment* means a demand for acceptance or payment made upon the maker, acceptor, drawee or other payor by or on behalf of the holder, and may involve the use of electronic transmission of an instrument or item or transmission of data from the instrument or item by electronic or mechanical means.

*Statement packaging* includes receiving statement information from members or eligible institutions or their service bureaus on respective customer cycle dates; printing statements; matching customer account statements; packaging the statements with appropriate items and informational materials, as authorized by individual members and eligible institutions, for distribution to their customers; sending the packages to the members or eligible institutions or mailing the packages directly to their customers.

*Storage services* includes filing, storage, and truncation of items.

*Transportation of items* includes transporting items from Federal Reserve offices, other Banks' clearinghouse associations, depository institutions, and other direct sending entities to a Bank; forwarding items to financial institutions after sorting; and forwarding cash items or return items to Federal Reserve offices and other sending entities.
# C_2022007EN.01000101.xml

| 7.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 January 2022

(2022/C 7/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1315 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83593 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0395 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,528 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5614 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9435 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,5504 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5778 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4451 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8272 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6752 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5388 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7932 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2187 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5197 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 291,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7670 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,943 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,5088 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,962 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4420 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2549 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,2475 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1315

JPY

Japanese yen

131,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83593

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3265

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0395

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,528

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5614

RON

Romanian leu

4,9435

TRY

Turkish lira

15,5504

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5778

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4451

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8272

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6752

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5388

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,06

ZAR

South African rand

17,7932

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2187

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5197

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 291,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7670

PHP

Philippine peso

57,943

RUB

Russian rouble

86,5088

THB

Thai baht

37,962

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4420

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2549

INR

Indian rupee

84,2475

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
CNO 03.31.2015 EX 10.6






Exhibit 10.6


CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CNO Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is amending the treatment of awards under the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") in the event that your employment is terminated due to death or disability or in connection with a Change in Control.  Capitalized terms used in this letter agreement without definition shall have the meaning set forth in the original award agreement(s).  
(a)Effect on Vesting and Exercisability of Restricted Shares upon Termination of Employment.  Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary of an outstanding award agreement under the Plan, the following special vesting rules shall apply if your employment with the Company or a Subsidiary terminates prior to Restricted Shares becoming fully vested in the circumstances set forth below:


(i)Termination Due to Death.  If your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary due to your death, any unvested Restricted Shares shall vest in full as of such date.


(ii)Termination Due to Disability.  If your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary due to your Disability, any unvested Restricted Shares shall continue to vest thereafter on the same vesting schedule as if you had remained an employee.


(iii)Change in Control.  In the event your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary without Cause or by you for Good Reason (as defined in your Option award agreements) within six months prior to and in anticipation of or within 24 months after a Change in Control has occurred, any unvested Restricted Shares shall vest in full as of such date of termination.


(b) All other provisions of the outstanding Restricted Share award agreements shall remain in full force and effect.  


To execute this amendment and confirm your agreement to its terms you must click the Acknowledge and Agree button in the accompanying email.


Very truly yours,
	
		
	CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Sue Menzel

	Susan L. Menzel, EVP, Human Resources
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00380-CR

MATTHEW RAY LUCKEY

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-CR-8733-DC

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 1, 2024
# C_2022130EN.01000401.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 March 2022

(2022/C 130/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1024 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4402 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83228 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3822 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0275 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6233 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,679 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 371,23 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6851 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,3432 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4802 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3867 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6285 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5860 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4957 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3430 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0137 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 808,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6483 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,749 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,881 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4105 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3667 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9145 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1024

JPY

Japanese yen

132,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4402

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83228

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3822

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0275

ISK

Iceland króna

142,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6233

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,679

HUF

Hungarian forint

371,23

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6851

RON

Romanian leu

4,9463

TRY

Turkish lira

16,3432

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4802

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3867

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6285

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5860

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4957

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,81

ZAR

South African rand

16,3430

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0137

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 808,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6483

PHP

Philippine peso

57,749

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,881

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4105

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3667

INR

Indian rupee

83,9145

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Maldives

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Maldives			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives  

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives 

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing an audit report of the entire annual executed budget within a reasonable period.Budget documents were made widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.Budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue, and budget documents were considered generally reliable.Information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence.The sovereign wealth fund did not have a sound legal framework or disclose its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Maldives’ fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Ensuring the sovereign wealth fund has a sound legal framework and discloses its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives  

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMaldives

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
**Exhibit 12(a)****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES****(1)**The following table sets forth Lamar Advertising’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for theperiods indicated.                   YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,(dollars in thousands) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Net income (loss) (108,634)(36,328)(39,755)13,155 41,779 43,899            Income tax (benefit) expense (45,674)(19,694)(23,573)11,305 31,899 34,227 Fixed charges 174,143 158,084 142,545 127,933 147,069 173,889                           Earnings 19,835 102,062 79,217 152,393 220,747 252,015                          Interest expense, net 132,200 112,404 93,285 75,584 89,160 111,644            Rents under leasesrepresentative of aninterest factor (1/3) 41,578 45,315 48,895 51,984 57,544 61,880 Preferred dividends 365 365 365 365 365 365                     Fixed charges 174,143 158,084 142,545 127,933 147,069 173,889                          Ratio of earnings tofixedcharges(2) 0.1x0.6x0.6x1.2x1.5x1.5x               (1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earnings divided by fixed charges.For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes andcumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges isdefined as the sum of interest expense, preferred stock dividends and the component of rentalexpense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts. (2) For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, earnings were insufficient to coverfixed charges by $154.3 million, $56.0 million and $63.3 million, respectively.
### ~ ' §

### ~ 

# t• PIJ I. i

### ~~ • I 

# I 

# !i 

# h rli 

# l.h h ilil!lU!h**"!1.~** 

# ib**~** 3

### nn•~ R;

### ~ 

## !fg a; I}( f! 

### 1:! !li 

### f 

### !tlil**I~JJ ~**  

### 111: 

### fi !1111 itti



# - ,1**.~i** 

# u llillllll!n 

# I!III illi 11 n ill 

# nnu 

# h 1

.. 3 

### '1**~~~** 

### i l!li I i!it 

### i IIi! II !I 

### ! 

## li ill**ii~** 

### I

IS f . I f ,. • 

### 'r 

## Is,!. f 

## rtl.. 

# '•I . ! .II I 8**~** i.. . l ..... 

## II l J ,.. I 1 ,, .. J I I .. 

# 'I lJt I 

### lt .. 

## l . - i .. i t- .. , :z: 1 1 

### 1 l I**~·** i 

### 'II } 1 i**1~** ·**r~ ~** **~-~~** I**~** If**~** 91 

### f 1 

### I lor 

### h 

### I**~** j 

### t i I l! J 1**~**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC 

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 689

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of March, 2019, Joseph P. Martone, Esquire, Erie County, 

is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee 

for a term of five years, commencing April 1, 2019.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-4122

Lower Tribunal No. 2022-DP-392

_____________________________

In the Interest of E.M. and I.T., children.

D.T.,

Appellant, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Greg A. Tynan, Judge.

March 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOZNIAK, WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Keith Peterson, of the Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. 

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, of the Department of Children and Families, Bradenton, for 

Appellee, Department of Children and Families.

Lynn James Hinson, Orlando, for Appellee, Guardian ad Litem. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 56031          Scale: 1,000,000          Edition: 1          Edition Date: 01-AUG-92          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1992/39**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7372

TROY ATERA BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-479-7) Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2001 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Atera Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Troy Atera Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) without prejudice for failure to comply with a district court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because Brown may reinstate his suit by merely providing information requested by the district court, we lack jurisdiction to decide this appeal. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1015.11 Severability.

The provisions of this rule are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, it is the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's intention that the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.