alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116 STAT. 80 PUBLIC LAW 107–154—MAR. 25, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3986:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Mar. 19, considered and passed House.

Mar. 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–154

107th Congress

An Act

To extend the period of availability of unemployment assistance under the Robert

T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in the case of victims

of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE.

Notwithstanding section 410(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5177(a)),

in the case of any individual eligible to receive unemployment

assistance under section 410(a) of that Act as a result of the

terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the President shall make

such assistance available for 39 weeks after the major disaster

is declared.

Approved March 25, 2002.

President.

Mar. 25, 2002

[H.R. 3986]
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Bangladesh

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Bangladesh			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Bangladesh 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Bangladesh

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal and enacted budget publicly available, including online.It did not make its end-of-year report publicly available within a reasonable period.Information in the budget was considered generally reliable, although budget documents were not prepared according to internationally accepted principles.Information on debt obligations was publicly available.Budget documents provided a reasonably complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue, including natural resource revenues.However, the government did not break down expenditures to support executive offices.Publicly available budget documents included financial allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises.Information on debt obligations was publicly available.The government’s supreme audit institution reviewed the government’s accounts, but its reports did not contain substantive findings and were not made publicly available within a reasonable period.The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence.The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not consistently made publicly available.

Bangladesh’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Making its end-of-year report publicly available within a reasonable period;
-  Preparing budget documents according to internationally accepted principles;
-  Breaking down expenditures to support executive offices in the budget;
-  Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and has sufficient resources;
-  Publishing timely audit reports that contain substantive findings, recommendations, and narratives; and
-  Making basic information about natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Bangladesh 

Tags

BangladeshBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# Official Journal C 144A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.144.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 144A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 533 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.144.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 144A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 533 June 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2010/C 144A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/74/08 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of security | 1 |
| 2010/C 144A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/141/08 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of security | 3 |
| 2010/C 144A/03 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/49-50/08 — Assistants (AST 3) — Audit — Statistics/Economics — EU12 | 4 |
| 2010/C 144A/04 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/54-55/08 — Assistants (AST 3) — Audit — Statistics/Economics — EU27 | 7 |
| 2010/C 144A/05 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/78-81-82-84/09 — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field (CZ/LT/LV/PL) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2010/C 144A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/74/08 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of security

1

2010/C 144A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/141/08 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of security

3

2010/C 144A/03

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/49-50/08 — Assistants (AST 3) — Audit — Statistics/Economics — EU12

4

2010/C 144A/04

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/54-55/08 — Assistants (AST 3) — Audit — Statistics/Economics — EU27

7

2010/C 144A/05

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AST/78-81-82-84/09 — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field (CZ/LT/LV/PL)

10

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 22 7 . HARVEY VI NCENT et a l . v . BRANDI CHEYANNE VI NCENT.

Harv ey Vi n cen t an d A n ni e Nel l V i n cen t

, t h e p at er n a l g r an d p aren t s o f m i n o r

c h i l d ren L. G. V. an d B. T. V., fi l ed a p et it i on fo r g ran d p aren t v is it at i o n

. Th e i r

fo rm er d au g ht er-i n-l aw, Bran d i Ch ey an n e V i ncen t

, was n am ed as res p on d e n t

. T h e

t ri al co u rt d en i ed th e g ran dp aren t s ’ s p et it i on , an d t h ey fi l ed t hi s ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary

ap peal

. U n d er OCGA § 5-6 -3 4 (a) (1 1 ), “ [a] l l ju d g m en t s o r o rd ers i n ch il d c u s t o d y

cas es a w a r d i n g , refu s i n g to ch an g e, o r m o d i fy i ng ch i l d cu st od y o r h o l d i n g o r

d ecl i ni n g t o h o l d p ers o n s i n co n t em p t of s u ch ch i l d cu s t o d y j u d gm en t o r o rd ers ” m ay

b e ap p eal ed d i rect l y

. Un d er Geo rg i a l aw, “ [v ] is it at i o n i s co n s i d ered a cu s t o d y i s s u e.”

Da n i el s v. Ba rn es , 2 8 9 Ga. Ap p

. 8 9 7

, 8 9 9 n

. 1 (6 5 8 SE2 d 4 7 2) (2 0 08 ); s ee al s o

OCGA § 1 9
- 9 -4 1 (4 ) (d efi n i n g “ ch i l d cu s t o d y p ro ceed i n g ” as “ a p ro ceed i n g i n wh i ch

l eg al cu s t o d y , p h y s i cal cu s t o d y , o r v i s i t at i o n wi th res p ect t o a ch i l d i s i n i s s u e.”).

Th u s, t he o rd er t h at t h e g ran d paren t s s eek t o ap p eal i s d i rect l y ap p eal ab le.

Ord i n ari l y , we wi l l g ran t a ti m el y ap p l i cat io n wh en t h e l o wer co u rt ’ s o rd er i s

s u b ject t o d i rect ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). In t h i s cas e, h owev er, t h e

g r a n d paren t s h av e al read y fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er.

Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s s u p erfl u ou s , an d i t i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/30/2015 January 30, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000899045
<NAME> LAMAR ADVERTISING
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,246
<SECURITIES>                                       679
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,311
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,420
<PP&E>                                         429,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 651,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,758
<BONDS>                                        534,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,649
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   651,336
<SALES>                                        200,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,062
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,098
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,654
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
§ 1261.5 Director eligibility. ( a ) *Eligibility requirements for member directors.* Each member director, and each nominee to a member directorship, shall be: ( 1 ) A citizen of the United States; and
( 2 ) An officer or director of a member that is located in the district in which the Bank is located and that meets all minimum capital requirements established by its appropriate Federal banking agency or appropriate State regulator. In the case of a director elected by the members, the institution of which the director is an officer or director must have been a member as of the record date. In the case of a director elected by a Bank's board of directors to fill a vacancy, the institution of which the director is an officer or director must be a member at the time the board acts.
( b ) *State designation for member directors.* Each member director, and each nominee to a member directorship, shall be an officer or director of a member that is located in the State to which the Director has allocated such directorship under § 1261.4(c).
( c ) *Eligibility requirements for independent directors.* Each independent director, and each nominee to an independent directorship, shall be: ( 1 ) A citizen of the United States; and
( 2 ) A bona fide resident of the district in which the Bank is located.
( d ) *Restrictions.* ( 1 ) A nominee is not eligible if he or she: ( i ) Is an incumbent director, unless: ( A ) The incumbent director's term of office would expire before the new term of office would begin; and
( B ) The new term of office would not be barred by the term limit provision of section 7(d) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1427(d)); or
( ii ) Is a former director whose service would be barred by the term limit provision of section 7(d) of the Bank Act.
( 2 ) For purposes of applying the term limit provision of section 7(d) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1427(d)): ( i ) A term of office that is adjusted after July 30, 2008 to a period of fewer than four years shall not be deemed to be a full term;
( ii ) Any member director's election and service to a directorship with a three year term of office prior to July 30, 2008 shall be deemed to be a full term;
( iii ) Any three-year term of office that ends immediately before a term of office that is adjusted after July 30, 2008 to a period of fewer than four years, and any term of office commencing immediately following such adjusted term of office, shall constitute consecutive full terms of office; and
( iv ) Any period of time served by a director who has been elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy shall not be deemed to constitute a full term.
( e ) *Loss of eligibility.* A director shall become ineligible to remain in office if, during his or her term of office, the directorship to which he or she has been elected is eliminated. The incumbent director shall become ineligible after the close of business on December 31 of the year in which the directorship is eliminated.
[73 FR 55715, Sept. 26, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 51461, Oct. 7, 2009; 75 FR 17039, 17040, Apr. 5, 2010; 81 FR 76296, Nov. 2, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   273,536
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             13,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         290,544
<PP&E>                                                 5,531,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,668,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,385,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    152,467
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,233,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,385,922
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         378,712
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            266,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          112,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      112,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             112,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1282.19 Affordability—Rent level definitions—tenant income is not known.

For purposes of determining whether a rental unit is affordable where the income of the family in the dwelling unit is not known to the Enterprise, the affordability of the unit is determined based on unit size as follows:

(a) *For moderate-income,* maximum affordable rents to count as housing for moderate-income families shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 21 |
| 1 bedroom | 22.5 |
| 2 bedrooms | 27 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | \* |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*31.2% plus (3.6% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(b) *For low-income (80%),* maximum affordable rents to count as housing for low-income (80%) families shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 16.8 |
| 1 bedroom | 18 |
| 2 bedrooms | 21.6 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | \* |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*24.96% plus (2.88% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(c) *For low-income (60%),* maximum affordable rents to count as housing for low-income (60%) families shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 12.6 |
| 1 bedroom | 13.5 |
| 2 bedrooms | 16.2 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | \* |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*18.72% plus (2.16% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(d) *For very low-income,* maximum affordable rents to count as housing for very low-income families shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 10.5 |
| 1 bedroom | 11.25 |
| 2 bedrooms | 13.5 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | \* |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*15.6% plus (1.8% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(e) *For extremely low-income,* maximum affordable rents to count as housing for extremely low-income families shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 6.3 |
| 1 bedroom | 6.75 |
| 2 bedrooms | 8.1 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | \* |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \* 9.36% plus (1.08% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

[[75 FR 55930](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-55930), Sept. 14, 2010, as amended at [80 FR 53432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-53432), Sept. 3, 2015]
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SS.1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                             |                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | **IR                BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.** |
|                              |                                        |                                                                                                              |
| Date:                November 14, 2007 | By:                                    | /s/                Michael K.                Wilhelm            |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer           |
|                                   |                                             |
#### John J. Little et al., Respondents, *v.*The Greater New York Amusement Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

A. I. Sire, for appellant.

John Poth, Jr., for respondents.

Hascall, J.

This appeal brings up no question of fact for review, and we think that the disposition of the issues was properly made at the Trial Term.

Judgment appealed from will be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Oxford Construction of Pennsylvania, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W9 l 2GB-l 3--C-OO 17 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61311 

Michael H. Payne, Esq. 

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall 

& Furman PC 

Philadelphia, PA 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Brett R. Howard, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Europe 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: May 23, 2019 

Admmistrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61311, Appeal of Oxford 

Construction of Pennsylvania, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals