alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1805.105 Uniform Requirements; Waiver authority. ( a ) *Uniform Requirements.* The Uniform Requirements will be applied to all awards made pursuant to this part, as applicable.
( b ) *Waiver authority.* The CDFI Fund may waive any requirement of this part that is not required by law upon a determination of good cause. Each such waiver shall be in writing and supported by a statement of the facts and the grounds forming the basis of the waiver. For a waiver in an individual case, the CDFI Fund must determine that application of the requirement to be waived would adversely affect the achievement of the purposes of the Act. For waivers of general applicability, the CDFI Fund will publish notification of granted waivers in the Federal Register.
# C_2022145EN.01000801.xml

| 1.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/8

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 145/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovenia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Slovenia

Subject of commemoration: The 150th anniversary of the birth of architect Jože Plečnik

Description of the design: The design shows a detail of the grand window of the National and University library’s reading room with a pillar in front of it. It is supplemented with a composition of letters A R H. P L E Č N I K. These letters are built into the window in exact order and can be metaphorically read as the architect’s signature, which is actually exhibited in his own work. The letters are inserted into deepened window openings and can be understood (in the language of architect Plečnik) as spatial architectural interventions, as emphases, inserted into façade or as geometrically designed objects. The whole composition displays an idea of space that reflects the wealth of the architect’s ideas. It is centred around the main pillar, which has a role to mark the coin’s space and set the ratio outside – inside or front – back, one of Plečnik’s common gestures when designing space. With that, the composition becomes a spatial miniature, space within space, multi-layered and mystical. At the bottom, the inscription “JOŽE PLEČNIK«. At the left, vertically, the year ‘1872’. At the right, vertically, the country of issuance ‘SLOVENIJA’ and underneath the year of issuance ‘2022’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: January 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Wilhelm, certify that:


1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB/A of IR  BioSciences
Holdings, Inc.


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods represented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) =for the registrant and we have:

a. designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.  evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


                                        /s/ Michael Wilhelm
                                        -----------------------
                                        Michael Wilhelm
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 16, 2005
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

mur 

tion or th4 r0rt1 

13, istio1e 9048 

e4rtdn rmw 

ti oux htorpr*%a1 Tax lmf (3scbton 

1, 

tuta*)) unbr 

for aonvaol6aoe en8 

oonnecbion with the 

on gelmtall~ i8 esthor 

oL8rod aLl8 us68 in 60nnaarehiolee, tioti only to 

of fhi8 state, but 8160 

the 64mwtbetl 

. Rive ol maah 

. and fn oonneation with oaah 

ba authorlmd to Irma 

warraata in nael 3x aefubl olabf4 

tilid ior P motor furl usad rar 

oper*tlng a ty or the ~it.0 rerwred to la the tin 

itas abom ’ (Artfol* Toa, Section Mu)” 

3eatLon W, I\rOlole 7068, Vertwnta uuiotatml Qlvll 

Statutes, inoluder wrlthln it8 alght mbreotlona ,611 aC th6 

t&l-s5 a%¶ ~roYln~On8 regulating the x8urklng anb tilWWa@ Of 

refund alrimr by the State for taxan oolleatbd 5ri tb aah Oi 

sotor ru0i wlthio the stat4 for ufm under osrtafn eopditlona 


820. 
821 
822 
823 
824 
825 
826 

~QAVtW4ly, it 18 8Ur QpintOa t&t tha tUI B?l 

~motor tuel wad Sor the 

(b P 

urpowr und under tbe ooaditZon4 

r&tad la aubllvl~i8n of y8ur lift% quurtlon, wul.4 nob 

be ruhfsot 80 refud boammo the aaotor vehiaio UM~ here 

1s *operated or lntamtsrl to 50 opuuted lea whole or in part 

upon tbr B1&wayo, roads rr4 rtrttots of this :%ato.* 

~cbhoiid u-a ik OOmif0tf0~ ah rambg op4mhw3, w 40 

not t&k it i&r *traotor w4& for atgicultun~ pawpo448,m 

wlthla the amtorylatior of the nfund grovlafona, becaom 

it 1s OOn8tl'U4t.& and 864i@I@3 ior tSUWJVOFti~ PrOPB'tY 

t@on w&l along tbe hk$iwayr 4f tha State, and nlaht be 44 

a+lVentrnt&f tlS%d b7 ~OtitSMtOS8 OS OtttoP ;arSollS tPUlI8- 

pmtlnG piOg4l?t7 by tPt@l.llP, a0 br fUEi@l(l. It i8 Wt th0 

6h6a Of ;41r66n6 u8hQ3 such tructor nkioh 1s dbt4tinatlm 

4r lta ln41u4lon la the ratis prsrrlslonr or thr law,' but 

ratkar th4 ~68 to rdrlak roah traotor i6 put* 

Xlth crieren& to 

of this DeprrtmeQt adwrteab tD 

undu date 0r Iby 7, 19W, 4aiI 

lQS3, both dLreOt%d t6 pu, rc) 

glwn, 94~8~~4~04~to erurul* 

the two OutstaAaing o;rlnloa4 

ln your lofter, tk4 firat 

tb8 oihar of 4ata June T,.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctions on Nicaragua’s Attorney General

# 									Sanctions on Nicaragua’s Attorney General							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 21, 2024

The United States is designating Nicaragua’s Attorney General Wendy Carolina Morales Urbina for her role in supporting the ruthless oppression of peaceful opposition members in Nicaragua by President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Vice President Rosario Murillo.

As Attorney General, Morales Urbina silenced opposition voices, and seized the property of over 300 Nicaraguans.  She supported Ortega’s move to strip exiled political prisoners of their citizenship.  She is responsible for the arbitrary shuttering of over 3,500 civil society organizations, including over 250 evangelical groups.  Morales Urbina took part in the Ortega-Murillo regime’s baseless attacks on religious institutions, which included false charges and unjust detentions of religious leaders.  We reaffirm our commitment to promote accountability for the malign conduct of the Nicaraguan regime and its collaborators.

*The Department of the Treasury is imposing sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13851.  For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsNicaraguaOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top
# International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling and Protocol – United States Department of State
# C_2023122EN.01000101.xml

| 4.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

3,50 % on 1 April 2023

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 April 2023

(2023/C 122/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0870 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4504 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9949 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,440 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 378,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6765 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9367 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,8726 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6080 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4628 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5328 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7283 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4464 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 429,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4208 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4832 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 269,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8035 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,383 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,306 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4786 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5519 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,4710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0870

JPY

Japanese yen

144,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4504

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87790

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2835

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9949

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,440

HUF

Hungarian forint

378,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6765

RON

Romanian leu

4,9367

TRY

Turkish lira

20,8726

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6080

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4628

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5328

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7283

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4464

KRW

South Korean won

1 429,43

ZAR

South African rand

19,4208

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4832

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 269,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8035

PHP

Philippine peso

59,383

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,306

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4786

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5519

INR

Indian rupee

89,4710

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Home1987 Treaties and Agreements...Saint Kitts and Nevis (87-609) – Defense Agreement concerning Status of Forces

# 									Saint Kitts and Nevis (87-609) – Defense Agreement concerning Status of Forces							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 9, 1987

Defense:  Status of Forces

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at St. John’s and Basseterre March 2 and June 9, 1987; entered into force June 9, 1987.
Download Agreement						 [839 KB]

Tags

DefenseDefense ArticlesSaint Kitts and NevisTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
reviews the district court's findings of fact for substantial evidence. 

### In re

Parental Rights as to A.L., 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 91, 337 P.3d 758, 761 (2014). Substantial evidence supports the district court's findings of parental fault. Both parties agree that appellant had not seen the children since 2008, had not made an effort to keep in touch with respondent or the children between 2008 and 2011, and had paid no child support except for an IRS tax return intercept. This undisputed evidence supports the district court's findings that appellant abandoned the children, made only token efforts to communicate with the children, and made no effort to support the children, and thus, that parental fault grounds existed under NRS 128.105(2)(a) and (f)(1). 

### SeeNRS 128.012 (defining abandonment of a child for parental fault purposes).

Substantial evidence also supports the district court's finding that terminating appellant's rights would serve the children's best
interest. 

### See NRS 128.105(1). The district court concluded that terminating appellant's rights would promote stability in the children's lives, strengthen their family unit, and best serve the continuing needs of the children for mental and emotional growth and development. Respondent testified that the children do not know appellant, and that reintroducing her to them would be psychologically damaging and cause negative behavior in the children. He explained that the older child had a pervasive developmental disorder which would cause irreparable damage if appellant came back into his life and left again. Respondent testified that based on appellant's past behavior he was concerned that if appellant's rights were not terminated she would exercise visitation for a short period of time and then disappear, which would cause behavioral

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A )9M0

### problems and psychological damage to both children. Appellant's past

depression and drug use, inability to follow through with a court-ordered psychological evaluation, and three-year delay in seeking to reunite with the children even after becoming clean, lends credence to these concerns. Appellant sought to rebut respondent's testimony, testifying that she was seeking treatment for her depression and would be a stable figure in the children's lives. This court, however, will not reweigh on appeal the credibility of witnesses. Castle v. Simmons, 

### 120 Nev. 98, 103, 86 P.3d 1042, 1046 (2004) (providing that the duty of weighing witness credibility 'rests within the trier of fact's sound discretion"). Taken in sum, the record provides substantial evidence supporting the district court's finding that the children's best interest would be served by terminating appellant's parental rights.

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. James E Wilson, District Judge Robert B. Walker Robert A. Grayson Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 3

(0) 1947A 

### e
# L_2013189EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
From: Paula Hirtz
, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

To : OSWRO Rulemaking Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0360 Date : January 21, 2015 Subject: Correspondence with Eastman Chemical Company on the Off

- Site Waste and Recovery

Operations NESHAP

In e mail correspondence dated November 3, 2014 and January 21, 2015
, Mr. Chris Manley of Eastman Chemical Company indicated that Eastman facilities located in Longview, Texas and Kingsport, Tennessee can receive very limited volumes of off

- site waste from other Eastman owned loca tions or, potentially, very limited scenarios where Eastman products are involved which might be located off

site. When asked for clarification on this he stated that as Eastman is not in the business of commercially handling other company’s wastes, and t hat their OSWRO applicability at these facilities arises from taking materials from other Eastman sites, or for Eastman products that may have become contaminated or off

- specification that may need to be returned. Mr

. Manley sent the Title V permits for bot h facilities.

In phone correspondence dated January 13, 2015, Mr. Manley indicated that Eastman facilities located in Longview, Texas and Kingsport, Tennessee had experienced reductions in emissions of HAP, as reflected by TRI and NEI data for these facil ities , when comparing data from 2005 and 2011. Mr. M anley indicated that the Longview, TX facility experienced emission reductions due to the shutdown of assets including an ethylene plant that was not restarted and other emission reduction projects. He al so stated that the process emitting maleic anhydride was shut down and that improvements were made in startup and shutdown practices that reduced the amount of flaring. For the Kingsport, TN facility he stated that reductions in HAP emissions were due to n ormal variations in coal composition and feed rates to coal fired boilers.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A028
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/Afor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Benson,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

**Dated:  March 13, 2006**

|        |   | By:    |   | /s/ THOMAS  P. BENSON                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Thomas P. Benson                                                                                 |
|   |   |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President  and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB/Apursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
The DII Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos.
33-73556, 33-90572, 33-79940, 333-10999, 333-11001, 333-11005 and 333-11007 of
the DII Group, Inc. on Form S-8, of our reports dated January 28, 1999 (February
18, 1999 as to the redemption of convertible subordinated notes described in
Note 6 and September 8, 1999 as to Note 15), which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the restatement
discussed in Note 15, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of the DII Group, Inc. for the 53 weeks ended January 3, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Denver, Colorado
September 8, 1999
#### Alfred Ward, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, of counsel), for appellant.

C. H. Haubert (J. Campbell Thompson, of counsel), for respondent

Hascall, J.

No sufficient reason is shown for disturbing the findings and conclusions below.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.