T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r ab l e Ed w a r d R. K o rma n , Se n i o rD i s tr i c tJ u d g e f o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC ourtf

orE a s t e rn N e w Y ork, B r ookl y n, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MUNA Z ARR AH MAN, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70611 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 376- 344 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a y4, 2011 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f or e : N O O N A N a nd W A R D L A W , C i r c ui tJ udge s , a nd K O R M A N , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. ** M una z a rR a hm an ( “ R a hm a n” ) , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of B a ngl a de s h, pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar d o f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is



# FI LED MA Y24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e gr a ntthe pe t i t i on a nd r e m a nd. 1 . “W e h a v e lo n g h e ldth a t th e B I A ab u s e s its d is c r e tio n w h e n it f a ils to prov i de a r ea soned exp l anat i on for i t s a ct i on s. ” Mo vs is ia n v . A s h c r o ft , 395 F . 3d 1095, 1098 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . A r a t i ona l s y s t e m of l a w r e qui r e s s i m i l a rtr e a tm e ntof i de nt i c a l a s y l um c l a i m s , or , a tthe ve ryl e a s t , ar e a s onabl e e xpl a na t i on of in c o n s is te n t tr e a tm e n t. Se e N ju g u n a v . A s h c r o

ft , 37 4 F . 3d 76 5, 77 1 n . 4 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) ; W a n gv . A s h c r o

ft , 341 F . 3d 1015, 1019 n. 2 ( 9th C i r . 2003) . H e r e , the g o v ern m en t failed to p ro v id e a n y e x p lan atio n fo r w h y it d en ied R ah m an ’s appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um butgr a nt e d hi s ol de rs i s t e r ’ s . B oth s i bl i ngs ’ appl i c a t i ons w e r e ba s e d on the de t e nt i on a nd abus e of the i rm othe r , T a

j r i naR a hm a n, a nd on the m o th e r ’s c ap to r s ’ th r e a t to k id n ap a n d k ill h e rc h ild r e n . W e r e m a n d w ith i ns truc t i ons tha tthe a ge nc ypr ovi de a n e xpl a na t i on f orthe i nc ons i s t e nttr e a tm e nt of R ahm an’ s app l i ca t i on and thatof hi s s i st er . 2 . “T h e g o v e rn m e n t in im m ig r a tio n c a s e s m a yb e s u b je c t to e q u itab le es t op pel i f i thas e ng aged i n aff i rm at i ve m i sc on du ct . ” Sa l ga do -D i az v. G on zales , 3 9 5 F .3 d 1 1 5 8 , 1 1 6 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . T h e g o v e rn m e n t h a s ad u tyto a d ju d ic a te ap p lic a tio n s f

o ra s y lu m . See 5 U . S . C . § 555( b) ; 8 C . F . R . §§ 103. 2( b) ( 19) , 208. 14, 20 8. 19 . T he re cord cont ai ns no evi dence as t o w hether the go vernm enteveri ss ued3

a f i nal deci si on on the as yl um appl i ca t i on T aj ri na R ahm an fi l ed i n 1 99 3, on w hi ch s h e lis te d R a h m a n a s ad e r iv a tiv e b e n e f ic ia ry . A t o r a l a r g u m e n t a n d in r e s p o n s e to ourA pr i l 7, 2011 or de r , the gove rnm e nta s s e rt e d tha tthe D e pa rtm e ntof H om e l a nd S e c ur i ty( “ D H S ” ) “ de ni e d” R a hm a n’ s m othe r ’ s a s y l um appl i c a t i on. H ow e ve r , the o n l y ev i d en ce i n th e reco rd as t o th e st atu s o f T aj ri n a R ah m an ’ s ap p l i cat i o n i s a Jul y 14, 19 97 l ett eri n w hi ch the as yl um offi ce i nform ed her thati thad r e c o m m e n d e d ap p r o v a l o f h e rap p lic a tio n . T h e r e c o r d r e f

le c ts th a t th e g o v e rn m e n t a tto rn e yw a s p r e p a r e d s tip u la te to the I m m i gr a t i on J udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) gr a nt i ng R a hm a n a s y l um a s s oon a s the gr a ntof a s y l um t o R a hm a n’ s m othe rbe c a m e f i na l . T he I Jpos tpone d the he a r i ng on the me r i t s o f Ra h ma n ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m s e v e r a l t i me s i n o r d e rt o p r o v i d e a d d i t i o n a l t i me for the agency t o i ss ue a f i nal approv al of hi s m other’ s a sy l um appl i ca t i on . A tan i m m i gr a t i on c ourthe a r i ng on J ul y25, 2002, gove rnm e ntc ouns e l s t a t e d tha tthe g o v e rn m e n t “lo s t th e f

ile ” o f th e R a h m a n f

am ily . O n r e m a nd, the B I A s ha l l de t e rm i ne w he the rthe gove rnm e nt ’ s l os s of T aj ri na R ahm an’ s f

i l e and fa i l ure t o adj ud i ca t e heras yl um appl i ca t i on for over a d e c a d e c o n s titu te s a f

f irm a tiv e m is c o n d u c t. T he pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w i s G R A N T E D a nd the c a s e i s R E M A N D E D . T he p an el ret ai n s j u ri sd i ct i o n fo r p u rp o ses o f an y fu tu re ap p eal s.