alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1010.507 Effect of suspension or withdrawal of certification granted under 15 U.S.C. 1708(a)(1): Full disclosure requirement. ( a ) If a state certified under 15 U.S.C. 1708(a)(1) suspends its own certification or has its certification withdrawn under § 1010.505, the Federal disclosure materials accepted and made effective by the Director, pursuant to § 1010.506, prior to the suspension or withdrawal shall remain in effect unless otherwise suspended by the Director.
( b ) In the event that there is a change in a material fact with regard to a subdivision that remains registered under the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the developer shall file a new registration with the Director meeting the requirements of the then applicable Federal registration regulations. Modifications of the Federal format may be used as specified by the Director.
[76 FR 79489, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 29118, May 11, 2016]
§ 1263.5 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals by applicants.* — ( 1 ) *Filing procedure.* Within 90 calendar days of the date of a Bank's decision to deny an application for membership, the applicant may file a written appeal of the decision with FHFA.
( 2 ) *Documents.* The applicant's appeal shall be addressed to the Deputy Director for Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation, Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219, with a copy to the Bank, and shall include the following documents: ( i ) *Bank's decision resolution.* A copy of the Bank's decision resolution; and
( ii ) *Basis for appeal.* An applicant must provide a statement of the basis for the appeal with sufficient facts, information, analysis, and explanation to rebut any applicable presumptions, or otherwise to support the applicant's position.
( b ) *Record for appeal.* — ( 1 ) *Copy of membership file.* Upon receiving a copy of an appeal, the Bank whose action has been appealed (appellee Bank) shall provide FHFA with a copy of the applicant's complete membership file. Until FHFA resolves the appeal, the appellee Bank shall supplement the materials provided to FHFA as any new materials are received.
( 2 ) *Additional information.* FHFA may request additional information or further supporting arguments from the appellant, the appellee Bank, or any other party that FHFA deems appropriate.
( c ) *Deciding appeals.* FHFA shall consider the record for appeal described in paragraph (b) of this section and shall resolve the appeal based on the requirements of the Bank Act and this part within 90 calendar days of the date the appeal is filed with FHFA. In deciding the appeal, FHFA shall apply the presumptions in this part, unless the appellant or appellee Bank presents evidence to rebut a presumption as provided in § 1263.17.
#### § 1208.53 No requirement for duplicate notice.

Where FHFA has previously given a debtor any of the required notice and review opportunities with respect to a particular debt, FHFA is not required to duplicate such notice and review opportunities prior to initiating tax refund offset.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-134204, No. 333-120260, No. 333-43925, No. 333-48172, and No. 333-98123) of CDW Corporation ofour report dated March 1, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Chicago, Illinois    March 1, 2007
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133825 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ANTONIO L. THOMAS and ANTONIO L. Stephen J. Markman, THOMAS ASSOCIATED, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 133825 COA: 273283 Wayne CC: 02-220633-CZ LA-VAN HAWKINS and URBAN CITY FOODS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees,

and

MELVIN BUTCH HOLLOWELL, Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
HomeClimate and Environment...Climate and Environment

# Climate and Environment

355 items

        -    Remarks  		Briefing with Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry	  John KerryApril 8, 2021New Delhi, India 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s Visit to India and Meetings with Prime Minister and Top Officials in the Government of India	  April 8, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry with Raj Chengappa of India Today	  John KerryApril 8, 2021New Delhi, India 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry Travels to United Arab Emirates, India, and Bangladesh to Discuss the Climate Crisis   	  March 31, 2021 
        -    		Virtual Travel to the United Nations, New York, March 29, 2021	   
        -    		Independence and National Day of Bangladesh	  Ervin MassingaMarch 26, 2021Bangladesh EmbassyWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Renewal of the Charter for the Shipping Advisory Committee	  March 26, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Virtual Travel to the United Nations, New York	  Ned PriceMarch 26, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the Ministerial on Climate Action	  John KerryMarch 23, 2021Ministerial on Climate Action 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for the Monaco Blue Initiative	  John KerryMarch 22, 2021 

previous page1…3031323334…36next page

Back to Top
#### § 1041.13 Prohibition against evasion.

A lender must not take any action with the intent of evading the requirements of this part.
#### HELD V. BUCKLEY.

(Decided May 28, 1912.)

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. D. Merrill.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 396 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2649 

[Report No. 110–634] 

To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 

Adjustment Act of 1992. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2007 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

MAY 13, 2008 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 11, 2007] 

A BILL 

To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects 

Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hodges Surface 

5 Water Improvement and Reclamation Act of 2008’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2649 RH

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by insert5 ing after section 16ll the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. LAKE HODGES SURFACE WATER IMPROVE7 MENT AND RECLAMATION PROJECT. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in cooperation 

9 with the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, California, 

10 is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and 

11 construction of projects to treat, reclaim, and reuse im12 paired surface water from Lakes Hodges in San Diego 

13 County, California. 

14 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs of 

15 the projects authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 

16 percent of the total cost. 

17 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

18 funds for the operation or maintenance of a project author19 ized by this section.’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections in 

21 section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Ad22 justment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the item 

23 relating to section 163ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 163ll. Lake Hodges surface water improvement and reclamation 

project.’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 396 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2649 

[Report No. 110

–634] 

A BILL 

To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects 

Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992. 

MAY 13, 2008 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# C_2021448EN.01000401.xml

| 5.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 November 2021

(2021/C 448/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1569 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85350 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9060 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0554 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8590 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,469 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,86 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6067 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9494 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,2503 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5602 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4365 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0059 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6235 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5627 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 369,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5896 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3983 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5240 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 618,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8052 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,579 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,7443 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,542 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4833 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8191 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,0955 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1569

JPY

Japanese yen

131,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85350

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9060

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0554

ISK

Iceland króna

150,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8590

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,469

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,86

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6067

RON

Romanian leu

4,9494

TRY

Turkish lira

11,2503

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5602

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4365

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0059

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6235

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5627

KRW

South Korean won

1 369,33

ZAR

South African rand

17,5896

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3983

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5240

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 618,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8052

PHP

Philippine peso

58,579

RUB

Russian rouble

82,7443

THB

Thai baht

38,542

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4833

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8191

INR

Indian rupee

86,0955

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000302

07-OCT-2015

11:19 AM
§ 1263.19 Non-federally-insured credit unions. ( a ) *Applicants.* Except where otherwise provided, a non-federally-insured credit union applying to become a member of a Bank shall be treated as an insured depository institution for purposes of determining its eligibility for membership under this part, provided that all of the following requirements have been met: ( 1 ) *Notice.* Upon receiving from a non-federally-insured credit union an application for membership, a Bank shall promptly notify the applicant in writing that its application will not be deemed complete or be acted upon by the Bank until the applicant has, in addition to satisfying all other generally applicable requirements, complied with paragraph (a)(2) of this section and subsequently provided one of the items listed in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( 2 ) *Request to regulator.* After receiving the notice required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a non-federally-insured credit union applicant shall send to its appropriate State regulator a written request for a determination that the applicant met all of the eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance as of the date of the request. The applicant shall provide to the Bank a copy of that request simultaneously with its transmittal to the regulator.
( 3 ) *Completion of application.* A Bank may deem the application of a non-federally-insured credit union to be complete and may act upon the application, as provided under § 1263.3(c), only if it has received from the applicant one of the following items: ( i ) A written statement from the applicant's appropriate State regulator that the applicant met all of the eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance as of the date of the request sent pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( ii ) A written statement from the applicant's appropriate State regulator that it cannot or will not make a determination regarding the applicant's eligibility for Federal share insurance; or
( iii ) A written statement from the applicant, prepared no earlier than the end of the six-month period beginning on the date of the request sent pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, certifying that the applicant did not receive from its appropriate State regulator within that six-month period either a response as described in paragraph (a)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section or a response stating that the applicant did not meet all of the eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance as of the date of the request sent pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) *Members canceling Federal share insurance.* A Bank member that is a federally insured credit union and that subsequently cancels its Federal share insurance may remain a member of the Bank, subject to all regulatory provisions applicable to insured depository institution members, provided that the Bank has determined that the institution has canceled its Federal share insurance voluntarily.
[82 FR 25723, June 5, 2017]
EXHIBIT 99 
 
 
 
                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 
 
 
Board of Directors
FFY Financial Corp.
Youngstown, Ohio

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial 
condition of FFY Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1995 and the 
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity 
and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 1995. 
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the 
company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these 
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to 
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, 
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and 
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to 
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial 
position of FFY Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1995 and the 
consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows 
for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 1995 in conformity 
with generally accepted accounting principles.

     As discussed in Notes 1c and 12b to the consolidated financial 
statements, the company changed its method of accounting for securities and 
their Employee Stock Ownership Plan effective July 1, 1994. As discussed in 
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the company changed its 
method of accounting for income taxes effective July 1, 1993.


                                       /s/ HILL, BARTH & KING, INC.
                                           Hill, Barth & King, Inc.


Youngstown, Ohio
August 4, 1995
§ 1208.27 Notice of salary offset where FHFA is the paying agency. ( a ) *Notice.* Upon issuance of a proper certification by FHFA (for debts owed to FHFA) or upon receipt of a proper certification from another creditor agency, FHFA shall send the employee a written notice of salary offset.
( b ) *Content of notice.* Such written notice of salary offset shall advise the employee of the: ( 1 ) Certification that has been issued by FHFA or received from another creditor agency;
( 2 ) Amount of the debt and of the deductions to be made; and
( 3 ) Date and pay period when the salary offset will begin.
( c ) If FHFA is not the creditor agency, FHFA shall provide a copy of the notice of salary offset to the creditor agency and advise the creditor agency of the dollar amount to be offset and the pay period when the offset will begin.
#### § 1070.35 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If a stay of, or other relief from, the effect of a demand made pursuant to §§ 1070.33 and 1070.34 is declined or not obtained, or if the court or other judicial or quasi-judicial authority declines to stay the effect of the demand made pursuant to §§ 1070.33 and 1070.34, or if the court or other authority rules that the demand must be complied with irrespective of the General Counsel's instructions not to produce the material or disclose the information sought, the employee upon whom the demand has been made shall decline to comply with the demand citing this subpart and *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
**EXHIBIT11(a)**Lamar Advertising Company and Subsidiaries Earnings Per Share Computation InformationYears ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004               Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended   December 31,  December 31,  December 31,   2006  2005  2004 Net income applicable to common stock $43,534,000  $41,414,000  $12,790,000  Weighted average common shares outstanding  102,720,744   105,605,873   104,041,030 Shares issueable upon exercise of stock options  774,778   483,884   530,453 Incremental shares of convertible debt  —   —   —           Weighted average common shares and commonequivalents outstanding  103,495,522   106,089,757   104,571,483 Net income per common share basic and diluted $0.42  $0.39  $0.12 The above earnings per share (EPS) calculations are submitted in accordance with Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 128. An EPS calculation in accordance with Regulation S-K item601 (b) (11) is not shown above for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 because itproduces an antidilutive result. The following information is disclosed for purposes of calculatingantidilutive EPS for that period.               Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended   December 31,  December 31,  December 31,   2006  2005  2004 Net income (loss) applicable to common stock $43,534,000  $41,414,000  $12,790,000 Income impact of assumed conversions  5,042,031   5,042,031   5,042,031           Income(loss) available to common shareholders plus assumed conversion $48,576,031  $46,456,031  $17,832,031            Weighted average common shares outstanding  102,720,744   105,605,873   104,041,030 Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options  774,778   483,884   530,453 Incremental shares from convertible debt  5,581,755   5,581,755   5,581,755            Weighted average common shares plus dilutivepotential common shares  109,077,277   111,671,512   110,153,238           Net income (loss) per common share $0.45  $0.42  $0.16
§ 1408.41 Requesting current paying agency to offset salary. ( a ) To request a paying agency to impose a salary offset against amounts owed to the debtor, the Corporation shall provide the paying agency with a claim certification which meets the requirements set forth in § 1408.25(a) of this part. The Corporation shall also provide the paying agency with a repayment schedule determined under the provisions of § 1408.39 or in accordance with a repayment agreement entered into with the debtor.
( b ) If the employee separates from the paying agency before the debt is paid in full, the paying agency shall certify the total amount collected on the debt. A copy of this certification shall be sent to the employee and a copy shall be sent to the Corporation. If the paying agency is aware that the employee is entitled to payments from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, or other similar payments, it must provide written notification to the agency responsible for making such payments that the debtor owes a debt (including the amount) and that the provisions of this section have been fully complied with. However, the Corporation must submit a properly certified claim to the agency responsible for making such payments before the collection can be made.
( c ) When an employee transfers to another paying agency, the Corporation is not required to repeat the due process procedures set forth in 5 U.S.C. 5514 and this part to resume the collection. The Corporation shall, however, review the debt upon receiving the former paying agency's notice of the employee's transfer to make sure the collection is resumed by the new paying agency.
( d ) If a special review is conducted pursuant to § 1408.11 and results in a revised offset or repayment schedule, the Corporation shall provide a new claim certification to the paying agency.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2728 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the station of the United States Border Patrol 

located at 25762 Madison Avenue in Murrieta, California, as the ‘‘Theodore L. Newton, Jr. and George 

F. Azrak Border Patrol Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 2728 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The station of the United States Border Patrol lo3 cated at 25762 Madison Avenue in Murrieta, California, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore L. New5 ton, Jr. and George F. Azrak Border Patrol Station’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the station 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Theodore L. Newton, Jr. and George F. Azrak 

11 Border Patrol Station’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS