alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 8.4 Deduction of insurance premiums from compensation, retirement pay, or pension. The insured under a National Service life insurance policy which is not lapsed may authorize the monthly deduction of premiums from disability compensation, death compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, retirement pay, disability pension, or death pension that may be due and payable to him under any laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs in accordance with the following provisions. ( a ) The authorization may be made by an insured or the insured's legal representative. If the authorization is made by the insured's legal representative, it must be in writing over the signature of the representative and forwarded to the Department of Veterans Affairs along with a copy of the document which evidences the individual's authority to act on behalf of the insured. If an insured is incompetent and has no legal representative and has a spouse to whom benefits are being paid pursuant to Part 13 of this chapter, the spouse may authorize payment of insurance premiums through the deduction system. If an insured is incompetent and has no legal representative and an institutional award has been made in his or her behalf, the authorization may be executed by the Director of the field facility in which the insured is hospitalized or receiving domiciliary care, and in appropriate cases by the chief officers of State hospitals or other institutions to whom similar awards may have been approved.
( b ) The monthly disability compensation, death compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, retirement pay, disability pension, or death pension so due and payable must be equal to, or in excess of, the amount of the insurance premium figured on a monthly basis.
( c ) The authorization may be cancelled by the insured at any time. Such cancellation will be effective on the first day of the month following the month in which it is received by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( d ) If the benefits payable to the insured are apportioned under the regulations of the Department of Veterans Affairs now in effect or hereafter issued, the deduction authorized by the insured shall be from that portion awarded to the insured under such regulations.
( e ) The deduction authorized by a policyholder issued insurance under 38 U.S.C. 1925 will be automatically adjusted by the Department of Veterans Affairs to take cognizance of any premium adjustment made by the Secretary on such insurance provided the benefit payments due and payable to the insured are of an amount sufficient to pay the monthly insurance premium.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1908)
[13 FR 7110, Nov. 27, 1948, as amended at 14 FR 5241, Aug. 24, 1949; 24 FR 7327, Sept. 9, 1959; 28 FR 1542, Feb. 19, 1963; 30 FR 3645, Mar. 19, 1965; 54 FR 46231, Nov. 2, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29290, 29291, June 10, 1996. Redesignated at 65 FR 7437, Feb. 15, 2000]
SAMPLE
                            Post-Delivery Sale Notice



Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
P.O. Box 3707
Seattle, Washington  98124-2207

Attention:        Vice President - Contracts
                  Mail Stop 21-34

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In  connection   with  the  sale  by  American  Trans  Air,  Inc.   (Seller)  to
________________ (Purchaser) of the aircraft identified below, reference is made
to Purchase  Agreement  No.  _____ dated as of  ___________,  20__,  between The
Boeing Company  (Boeing) and Seller (the Purchase  Agreement) under which Seller
purchased certain Boeing Model ________ aircraft, including the aircraft bearing
Manufacturer's Serial No.(s) ______________________ (the Aircraft). The Purchase
Agreement  incorporated by reference  Aircraft General Terms Agreement  AGTA-AAT
(AGTA).

Capitalized  terms used herein without  definition will have the same meaning as
in the Purchase Agreement.

Seller has sold the  Aircraft,  including in that sale the transfer to Purchaser
of all remaining rights related to the Aircraft under the Purchase Agreement. To
accomplish  this  transfer of rights,  as  authorized  by the  provisions of the
Purchase Agreement:

(1) Purchaser  acknowledges it has reviewed the Purchase Agreement and agrees to
be bound by and comply with all applicable  terms and conditions of the Purchase
Agreement,  including,  without  limitation,  the  DISCLAIMER  AND  RELEASE  and
EXCLUSION OF CONSEQUENTIAL  AND OTHER DAMAGES in Article 11 of Part 2 of Exhibit
C to the AGTA and the insurance provisions in Article 8.2 of the AGTA. Purchaser
further  agrees upon the  written  request of Boeing,  to  promptly  execute and
deliver such further  assurances  and documents and take such further  action as
Boeing  may  reasonably  request  in  order  to  obtain  the  full  benefits  of
Purchaser's agreements in this paragraph; and

(2) Seller will remain  responsible  for any  payments due Boeing as a result of
obligations  relating to the Aircraft  incurred by Seller to Boeing prior to the
effective date of this letter.



<PAGE>


We request  that  Boeing  acknowledge  receipt of this  letter and  confirm  the
transfer of rights set forth above by signing the  acknowledgment and forwarding
one copy of this letter to each of the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

American Trans Air, Inc.                                Purchaser


By                                                      By
     -----------------------------------

Its                                                     Its
     -----------------------------------

Dated                                                   Dated
         -------------------------------


Receipt of the above  letter is  acknowledged  and  transfer of rights under the
Purchase  Agreement  with respect to the Aircraft is confirmed,  effective as of
this date.

THE BOEING COMPANY


By
     -----------------------------------

Its  Attorney-in-Fact
     -----------------------------------

Dated
         -------------------------------



Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number ____________
#### § 1208.50 Authority and scope.

The provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6402(d) and 31 U.S.C. 3720A authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to offset a delinquent debt owed the Federal Government from the tax refund due a taxpayer when other collection efforts have failed to recover the amount due. In addition, FHFA is authorized to collect debts by means of administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716 and, as part of the debt collection process, to notify the United States Department of Treasury's Financial Management Service of the amount of such debt for collection by tax refund offset.
MAY-7-2014 10:37 FROM:PHOENIX UNIFORMS 7 03533575 TO: 12023667638



### 935 Norl Imperial Avenue EJ

### C tro 

### CA92243 6().3SJ·9482

. 0 -q"
7 May 2014 Secretary Anthony Foxx U,S. Department of Transportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE Washingten, DC 20590 R
.E:Doc:ket DOT·OST·1008-0199 

### Dear Secretary Foxx: I write to express my objection to the Dep ent of Transportation's Tentative Order to terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) pr gram in El Centro, California located inImperial County. There will be severe negative econ ic impacts that occur as

### a.result ofthe proposed termination ofthe program. Imperial county Airport 11as a steady track re ord of surpassing the BAS program requirements put forth bythe DOT, as we have dramaticall exceeded the enplaaement minimum in four

## or the last five fiscal yeers, Unfortunately. in FY 2 13. the Imperial C('JUJlty Aitport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, hy reaching 9. enplancrncnts for the first lime Over the last "severalyears, Imperial County as 

### experienced the highest unemployment rate in the nation, Our federal government should e courage economic growth, and consider all factors before terminating a much

-needed program i the region. The BAS improves economic growth in nregion, and out region needs itmore than cr. The recent, temporary downturn in enplanements is due in part to the change in ar carriers, which causes people who use ex-pedia and other internet travel planners, to miss the vailability of air service into Imperial Airport. 1 myself experienced this same problem short! after the change ill uir carriers. As 

### you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to nsider the Imperial Valley'e track record over the last three fiscal years, and ask thnt you consid the void tbat will be left
. should the Department ofTransportation ultimately decide to termin e the desperately-needed Essential Air Service program currently in effect at the Imperial Co ty Airport. Also, the lost time & expense traveled by passengers who will have to use the:San 0 ego airport (a 3S0-mile roued trip). and tbe extra greenhouse gasses polluting the environment reduced by all those extra car trips. are not considered in your proposed 'Termination Ord

_Please rescind the Tentative Order to Terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) rogram inEI Centro, California, Very Truly Yours,

~~~ Bill DuBois El Centro CA
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 07 /25 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** 111d Discussion Call with the State of Colorado held on 07 / 10 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff discussed various questions on the proposed Clean Power Plan for E xisting Power Plants with the State of Colorado goal on 07 / 10 /2014
. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES:** EPA HQ: Travis Johnson EPA Region 8: Laura Farris, Mark Komp Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: Dena Wojtach, Curtis Taipale **ATTACHMENTS** Discussion Questions
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 5,  2004 |                                   | /s/ Gerard  E. Puorro |   |
|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |              | Gerard E.  Puorro                      |
|   |              | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2623 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2623

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the collection of 
copayments for all hospice care furnished by the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF COPAYMENTS FOR ALL HOSPICE CARE 
              FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 1710(f)(1), by inserting ``(except if such 
        care constitutes hospice care)'' after ``nursing home care'';
            (2) in section 1710(g)(1), by inserting ``(except if such 
        services constitute hospice care)'' after ``medical services''; 
        and
            (3) in section 1710B(c)(2), by striking subparagraph (B) 
        and inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 
        subparagraph (B):
            ``(B) to a veteran being furnished inpatient or outpatient 
        hospice care by the Department; or''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2623

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the collection of 
copayments for all hospice care furnished by the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      59,662,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,504,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                   398,610
<INVENTORY>                                 15,039,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            93,646,340
<PP&E>                                      30,366,674
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,897,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             189,889,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,109,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,143,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 168,354,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               189,889,241
<SALES>                                     29,775,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,775,682
<CGS>                                        8,878,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,878,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (15,814)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,308,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,190,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,117,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,117,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-41-16 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

HIROKO URANO,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 4472932)

 

Calendar Date: March 14, 2016

Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Hiroko Urano, Tokyo, Japan, respondent pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

2007, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object
-2- D-41-16 

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
§ 1081.407 Effective date; stays pending judicial review. ( a ) Other than consent orders, which become effective at the time specified therein, an order to cease and desist or for other affirmative action under section 1053(b) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5563(b)) becomes effective at the expiration of 30 days after the date of service pursuant to § 1081.113(d)(2), unless the Director agrees to stay the effectiveness of the order pursuant to this section.
( b ) Any party subject to a final decision and order, other than a consent order, may apply to the Director for a stay of all or part of that order pending judicial review.
( c ) A motion for stay must state the reasons a stay is warranted and the facts relied upon, and must include supporting affidavits or other sworn statements, and a copy of the relevant portions of the record. The motion must address the likelihood of the movant's success on appeal, whether the movant will suffer irreparable harm if a stay is not granted, the degree of injury to other parties if a stay is granted, and why the stay is in the public interest.
( d ) A motion for stay must be filed within 28 days of service of the order on the party. Any party opposing the motion may file a response within seven days after receipt of the motion. The movant may file a reply brief, limited to new matters raised by the response, within seven days after receipt of the response.
( e ) The commencement of proceedings for judicial review of a final decision and order of the Director does not, unless specifically ordered by the Director or a reviewing court, operate as a stay of any order issued by the Director. The Director has discretion, on such terms as the Director finds just, to stay the effectiveness of all or any part of an order pending a final decision on a petition for judicial review of that order.
# Official Journal C 1/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.001.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 544 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.001.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 1

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 544 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 001/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2011/C 001/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 001/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2011/C 001/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20923

USDC No. CR-H-90-291

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HAROLD TEEL TARTER,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

July 12, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harold Teel Tarter, federal prison # 54942-079 and Texas

prison # 283347, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal

from the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Tarter has identified no error in the

dismissal. United States v. Tarter, No. CA-H-95-838 (S.D. Tex.;

Sept. 14, 1995). 

 Accordingly, the appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous

issue, and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't, 811 F.2d 260, 261 
No. 95-20923

-2-

(5th Cir. 1986). The appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motions for appointment of counsel and

to expedite the appeal are also DENIED.

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 1402.23 Waiver or reduction of fees. ( a ) The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation may grant a waiver or reduction of fees if the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation determines that the disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the Government, and the disclosure of the information is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
( b ) The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation will not charge fees to any requester, including commercial use requesters, if the cost of collecting a fee would be equal to or greater than the fee itself. The elements to be considered in determining the “cost of collecting a fee” are the administrative costs of receiving and recording a requester's remittance and processing the fee.
§ 21.348 Leave following completion of a period of training or rehabilitation services. ( a ) *Leave following completion of training or rehabilitation services.* Leave may not be approved following completion of a period of rehabilitation services described in § 21.340(a).
( b ) *Postponement of the date of completion of a period of rehabilitation services prohibited.* The date of completion of the veteran's program may not be extended for the purpose of allowing the veteran to use leave.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3110)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 2, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-22894 Filed 9-18-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P