alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov> To: <steamhelp@erg.com> Date: 7/6/2010 3:59 PM Subject: Fw: Request for Extension - Luminant Power Attachments: 2010-07-06 Luminant Power request for extension.pdf

----- Forwarded by Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US on 07/06/2010 03:58 PM

----- From: "Spicer, Gary" <Gary.Spicer@luminant.com> To: "Alicea.jexebele@epa.gov" <Alicea.jexebele@epa.gov> Cc: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/06/2010 01:59 PM Subject: Request for Extension - Luminant Power

Dear Ms Alicea, Attached please find Luminant Power’s request for an extension for response to the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines for its eleven recipient plants. If you have any questions, please contact Gary Spicer at 214-875-8299 (office), 214-973-6150 (mobile) or via e-mail at spicer@luminant.com . Also, please respond to this e-mail as a method of confirming that you have received it.
(See attached file: 2010-07-06 Luminant Power request for extension.pdf)
No. [      ]                                                       [ ]Shares


               Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Indiana


                                  AMTRAN, INC.

                               SERIES A1 PREFERRED




                  This is to  certify  that [ ] is the  owner of [ ]  shares  of
Series A1 Preferred Stock of AMTRAN, INC. (the "Company"),  having no par value,
which shares are fully paid and non-assessable, and are transferable only on the
books of the  Company  by the  holder  hereof  in  person  or by  attorney  upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


                  IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the said  corporation  has  caused  this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized  officers and its corporate seal
to be hereunto affixed this [ ] day of [ ].





John P. Tague                               Brian Hunt
President and                               Secretary
Chief Executive Officer










THE SHARES  REPRESENTED  BY THIS  CERTIFICATE  HAVE BEEN  ACQUIRED BY THE HOLDER
SOLELY FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTMENT  AND NOT WITH A VIEW TO
OR FOR SALE IN  CONNECTION  WITH ANY  DISTRIBUTION  THEREOF IN  VIOLATION OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"),  AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS.  THESE  SECURITIES  HAVE NOT BEEN  REGISTERED  UNDER THE ACT OR APPLICABLE
STATE  SECURITIES  LAWS AND, UNLESS  REGISTERED,  MAY NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED
EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION THEREFROM.

THE DESIGNATION OF SERIES A1 PREFERRED STOCK SETTING FORTH THE RELATIVE  RIGHTS,
PREFERENCES  AND  LIMITATIONS  OF THE  SHARES  IS SET FORTH IN THE  ARTICLES  OF
AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY, A COPY OF WHICH SHALL
BE FURNISHED TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE BY THE COMPANY.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0613n.06
No. 14

- 5666 UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ODELL ANDRE HOLDER,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, CLAY, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
ROGERS , Circuit Judge

. This case returns from the Supreme Court on remand for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) , i n which the Supreme Court held that the Armed Career Criminal Act’s (ACCA) residual clause was void for
vagueness. 135 S. Ct. at 2564

. Odell Holder was sentenced as an armed career criminal on account of his previous convictions for violent felonies. One of Holder’s convictions was for evading arrest, a crime which qualified as a violent felony only under the ACCA’ s now invalidated residual clause. B ecause the district court relied on this conviction as one of the three convictions necessary to trigger the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence, Holder must
be resentenced because he has shown the elements of plain error

. Plain error review applies
b ecause Holder did not bring a vagueness challenge against the residual clause in the district

court

. See United States v. Milan , 398 F.3d 445, 450

– 54 (6th Cir. 2005)

. It is plain that Holder ’sNo. 14

- 5666

United States of America v. Holder

- 2

- evading arrest conviction i s n o longer a violent felony under the ACCA

. Even though the district court correctly applied the law at the time of sentencing, “it is enough that an error be ‘plain’ at the time of appellate consideration.” Johnson v. United States , 520 U.S. 461, 468 (199 7) . The erroneous application of the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence to Holder affected Holder’s
substa ntial rights and was an error that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of judicial proceedings. Accordingly, we vacate H older’s sentence and remand his case for resentencing.
#### § 1240.61 Purpose and scope.

Sections 1240.61 through 1240.63 of this subpart establish public disclosure requirements related to the capital requirements and buffers described in subpart B and subpart G.

[87 FR 33429, June 2, 2022]
1

Lee, Anita

From: Lee, Anita

Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:40 PM

To: Lee, Anita

Subject: FW: Send data from Toshiba2050c2

Attachments: DOC021715.pdf; ATT00001.htm

From: Drake, Kerry  

Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:06 AM

To: Hong, Jeanhee; Lee, Anita; Mays, Rory; Clancy, Maeve; Valentine, Stephanie

Subject: Fwd: Send data from Toshiba2050c2

Begin forwarded message: 

From: Tejon Scanner <office@tejontribe.net> 

Date: February 17, 2015 at 9:59:39 AM PST 

To: <drake.kerry@epa.gov> 

Subject: Send data from Toshiba2050c2

Scanned from Toshiba2050c2 

Date:02/17/2015 09:59 

Pages:1 

Resolution:200x200 DPI 

----------------------------------------
HomeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program...Reward Offer for Unknown Co-conspirators Responsible for Murder of Paraguayan Prosecutor Marcelo Daniel Pecci Albertini

# 									Reward Offer for Unknown Co-conspirators Responsible for Murder of Paraguayan Prosecutor Marcelo Daniel Pecci Albertini							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

November 17, 2022

**WANTED: UNSUBS RESPONSIBLE FOR MURDER OF MARCELO PECCI****REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION**

Learn more about this reward offer on our social media!

For more information please see Department of State Announces Reward Offer for Unknown Co-conspirators Responsible for Murder of Paraguayan Prosecutor Marcelo Daniel Pecci Albertini – United States Department of State

**NAME:** Unknown Subjects ResponsIble for Murder of Marcelo Pecci**ALIASES:** None**Date of Birth:** ???**Place of Birth:** ???**NATIONALITY:** Unknown**CITIZENSHIP:** Unknown**HEIGHT:** Unknown**WEIGHT:** Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Unknown**EYE COLOR:**Unknown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Marcelo Pecci was a successful specialized organized crime prosecutor in Paraguay, obtainingconvictions in highly publicized cases involving narcotics trafficking, money laundering, and corruption.Pecci recently married in Asunción and embarked with his new wife on a honeymoon to Cartagena,Colombia. On the morning of May 10, 2022, Pecci and his wife were on the beach when Pecci wasassassinated by gunshot.Subsequent investigation by the Colombian National Police in Cartagena quickly produced noteworthyresults. Video surveillance and immediate canvassing of the area by police helped identify the assassin,two lookouts, and two transporters who brought the gunman to the beach where the murder tookplace. A sixth individual was identified as the hit team organizer. Five of the six individuals werearrested in Colombia and quickly convicted and sentenced to 23 1⁄2 years of imprisonment. One of thetransporters remains a fugitive. Investigators are also seeking those individuals believed to have hiredthe hit team in Colombia.

As a result, the U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION** for informationleading to the arrest and/or conviction of the remaining unknown co-conspirators responsible for themurder of Marcelo Pecci.

If you have information, please contact the Paraguayan Public Ministry at +595-972-150-800(phone/text/WhatsApp/Telegram/ Signal/) or e-mail the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) atPecciReward@dea.gov. If you are located outside of the United States, you may also visit the nearestU.S. Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCrimeRewards for JusticeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program Targets

Back to Top
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Sierra Leone

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Sierra Leone			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Sierra Leone 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Sierra Leone

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing major state-owned enterprise debt information.  Budget documents and information on debt obligations were widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  The budget was substantially complete and generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence.  It reviewed the government’s accounts and made its reports publicly available.  The government specified in law or regulation but did not appear to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not publicly available.

Sierra Leone’s fiscal transparency would be enhanced by:

- Following procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts in practice; and
- Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Sierra Leone 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSenegal

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2022103EN.01000501.xml

| 3.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 March 2022

(2022/C 103/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1106 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4387 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83316 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7880 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0216 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8826 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,866 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 382,31 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8021 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,6280 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4088 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6785 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6404 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5059 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1904 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0153 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 980,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6595 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,206 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,339 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,7313 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9990 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,1765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1106

JPY

Japanese yen

128,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4387

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83316

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7880

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0216

ISK

Iceland króna

143,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8826

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,866

HUF

Hungarian forint

382,31

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8021

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

15,6280

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4088

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6785

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6404

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5059

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,99

ZAR

South African rand

17,1904

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0153

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 980,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6595

PHP

Philippine peso

57,206

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,339

BRL

Brazilian real

5,7313

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9990

INR

Indian rupee

84,1765

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine 
Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the 
Department of Defense announces that the following Federal advisory 
committee meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military 
Personnel Testing will take place:

DATES: Wednesday, February 5, 2009 (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Thursday, 
February 6, 2009 (8:30 a.m. to Noon).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Pine Inn, Ocean Avenue, 
between Lincoln and Monte Verde Street, Carmel, California 93923.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Committee's Designated Federal 
Officer, Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, 
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), 
Room 2B271, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone (703) 
697-9271.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of the meeting is to review 
planned changes and progress in developing computerized and paper-and-
pencil enlistment tests.
    Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of current enlistment test 
development timelines and planned research for the next three years.
    Public's Accessibility to the Meeting: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b 
and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165, and the availability of space, 
this meeting is open to the public.
    Oral Presentations or Written Statements: Persons desiring to make 
oral presentations or submit written statements for consideration at 
the Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. Arabian at the address 
or telephone number above no later than January 14, 2009.

    Dated: January 5, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-239 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### § 150.170 May my other departments or affiliates use fiduciary personnel and facilities to perform other services?

Your other departments or affiliates may use fiduciary officers, employees, and facilities to perform services unrelated to the exercise of fiduciary powers, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James F. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                      |  |    
|Dated: March 17, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES F.
ANDERSON                 
|                      |  |     |  | James F. Anderson Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 21.5901 Delegations of authority. ( a ) *General delegation of authority.* Except as otherwise provided, authority is delegated to the Under Secretary for Benefits and to supervisory or adjudication personnel within the jurisdiction of the Education Service of VA, designated by him or her to make findings and decisions under 10 U.S.C. chapter 107 and the applicable regulations, precedents and instructions concerning the program authorized by these regulations. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2144(c))
( b ) *Delegation of authority concerning the Civil Rights Act of 1984.* The Under Secretary for Benefits is delegated the responsibility to obtain evidence of voluntary compliance with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 from educational institutions and from recognized national organizations whose representatives are afforded space and office facilities under his or her jurisdiction. See part 18 of this title.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000)
[51 FR 27026, July 29, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 55761, Oct. 28, 1997]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices 

# Order

September 23, 2016

153311

PAULETTE HELD,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153311

COA: 321786

Ingham CC: 13

- 000241

- NO

NORTH SHORE CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

PURE GREEN LAWN AND TREE

PROFESSIONALS, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is conside red, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Z AHRA

, J. ( dissenting ).

I would peremptorily reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand

this case to the Ingham Circuit Court for entry of a judgment in favor of defendant North

Shore Condominium Association because the plastic landscape edging over which

plaintiff f ell was open and obvious. As Judge M ETER opined in his dissenting opinion, “a

picture is worth a thousand words.” 1 The photographs of the area where plaintiff fell

indicate that the edging can very clearly be seen curving around the sidewalk, as the re

1 Held v North Shore Condo Ass’n , unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of

Appeals, issued February 4, 2016 (Docket No. 321786) ( M ETER , J., dissenting), p 1

.I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2016

s0920 2

Clerk is a distinct color difference between the edging and the mulch. Thus, “an average

person with ordinary intelligence would have discovered [the edging] upon casual

inspection.” 2 Sometimes error in an unpublished opinion is so blatant, open, and obvious

that it must be corrected to maintain clarity of the law for the bench and bar. This is such

a case. I would reverse.

M ARKMAN

, J., joins the statement of Z AHRA

, J.

2 Hoffner v Lanctoe , 492 Mich 450, 461 (2012).
#### § 1008.303 Financial reporting.

To the extent that CSBS maintains the NMLSR, CSBS must annually provide to the Bureau, and the Bureau will annually collect and make available to the public, NMLSR financial statements, audited in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) promulgated by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, and other data. These financial statements and other data shall include, but not be limited to, the level and categories of funds received in relation to the NMLSR and how such funds are spent, including the aggregate total of funds paid for system development and improvements, the aggregate total of salaries and bonuses paid, the aggregate total of other administrative costs, and detail on other money spent, including money and interest paid to reimburse system investors or lenders, and a report of each state's activity with respect to the NMLSR, including the number of licensees, the state's financial commitment to the system, and the fees collected by the state through the NMLSR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

s0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137956 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137956 

 COA: 277716 

Delta CC: 06-007679-FH 

GREGORY PAUL BRICKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.