alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

ruCK PERRY 

GOVERNOR 

June 24, 2011 

Alfredo "AI" Armendariz, Ph.D. 


Regional Administrator 


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 


1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 


Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 


RE: 	 Proposed Listing of the US Oil Recovery Site on the federal National Priorities List 

Dear Dr. Armendariz: 

Texas supports the decision that the US Oil Recovery site be considered as a candidate site for 

the federal National Priorities List (NPL) for cleanup. 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality believes that this site is eligible for the 

proposed NPL listing based on agency evaluation of the site under the federal Hazard Ranking 

System. 

~~J Rick Perry 


Governor 


RP:tbp 

cc: 	 Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman, TCEQ 

Mark R. Vickery, P.G., Executive Director, TCEQ 

Mr. John Sadlier, Deputy Director, Office of Compliance and Enforcement, TCEQ 

Mr. Brent Wade, Director, Remediation Division, TCEQ 

Mr. Sam Coleman, Superfund Division Director, EPA 

Ms. Wren Stenger, Superfund Associate Director, EPA 

Mr. John Meyer, Chief Risk and Site Assessment, EPA 

Ms. Brenda Nixon Cook, Region 6, NPL Coordinator, EPA 

POST OFFICE Box 12428 AUSITN, TEXAS 78711 (512)463-2000 (VorCE)/DlAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES 

VISIT WWW.TEXASONUNE.COM mE OFFICIAL WEB SrIT OF THE STAlE OF TEXAS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of DHB  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Dawn
Schlegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 15, 2004                         By: /s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
                                                  ______________________________
                                                       Dawn M. Schlegel
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


This certification  accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2021513EN.01000301.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/3

---

Election of the First Advocate General

(2021/C 513/06)

At a meeting on 8 October 2021, the Advocates General elected, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Szpunar as First Advocate General for the period from 8 October 2021 to 6 October 2024.

---
#### Moses L. Leffler et al., Appellants, *v.*Sigmund Beck, Respondent.

Appeal from ah order of the City Court of the city of New York, opening a default taken at Trial Term and restoring the cause to the calendar, without costs.

George Hahn, for appellants.

Alfred B. Jaworower (Max D. Steuer, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It is contended on this appeal that the papers before the court on the motion were wholly insufficient to warrant *777the order made, and we agree with such contention. The default sought to he opened was regularly taken at the Trial Term. On the motion the only paper used by the respondent was the affidavit of the attorney, presented in obtaining the order to show cause, and while the order recites that it is made on the pleadings, the record does not bring that before us on this appeal. No affidavit of merits was used on the motion. The order was erroneously granted and must he reversed. See Deane v. Loucks, 58 Hun, 555; 25 Misc. Rep. 635.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order reversed, with costs.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Funding Opportunities
- Research and Resources
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Research and Resources – Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

# Research and Resources – Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

Research is instrumental in helping the Bureau and its partners adapt programs and policy engagement to emerging challenges and priorities, including through the development of tools, operational guidance, and best practices.

The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) supports humanitarian research in order to:
        - Promote evidence-based decision making on priority protection, assistance, and durable solution challenges
        - Enhance knowledge and develop guidance and tools to improve the performance of the Bureau and its partners
        - Disseminate and encourage the use of research findings and recommendations, guidance and tools by other humanitarian stakeholders

Learn more about PRM-funded research and evaluation. PRM also publishes Documents for Congress and an Annual Summary of Major Activities.

----

Please visit the state.gov archive to view PRM-funded research and evaluations and the Summary of Major Activities published prior to January 21, 2021.

Back to Top
# C_2023062EN.01000301.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 February 2023

(2023/C 62/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0625 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4464 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88888 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1983 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9896 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 154,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0150 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,715 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 386,61 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7773 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9165 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,0478 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5560 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4366 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3349 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7123 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4231 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,2650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3081 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 160,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7090 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,831 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,741 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5487 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7313 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,0210 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0625

JPY

Japanese yen

143,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4464

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88888

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1983

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9896

ISK

Iceland króna

154,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0150

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,715

HUF

Hungarian forint

386,61

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7773

RON

Romanian leu

4,9165

TRY

Turkish lira

20,0478

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5560

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4366

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3349

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7123

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4231

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,32

ZAR

South African rand

19,2650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3081

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 160,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7090

PHP

Philippine peso

58,831

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,741

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5487

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7313

INR

Indian rupee

88,0210

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1208.48 Requests for administrative offset from other Federal agencies. ( a ) Any agency may request that funds due and payable to a debtor by FHFA be administratively offset in order to collect a debt owed to such agency by the debtor.
( b ) FHFA shall initiate the requested administrative offset only upon: ( 1 ) Receipt of written certification from the creditor agency that: ( i ) The debtor owes the debt, including the amount and basis of the debt;
( ii ) The agency has prescribed regulations for the exercise of administrative offset; and
( iii ) The agency has complied with its own administrative offset regulations and with the applicable provisions of the FCCS, including providing any required hearing or review.
( 2 ) A determination by FHFA that collection by administrative offset against funds payable by FHFA would be in the best interest of the Federal Government as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case and that such administrative offset would not otherwise be contrary to law.
# C_2023043EN.01000101.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 February 2023

(2023/C 43/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0937 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89250 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3323 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9989 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 153,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9783 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,725 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 386,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6920 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9020 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 20,5806 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5499 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4616 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5802 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6886 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4331 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,7624 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3689 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 312,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6570 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,721 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,114 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,5414 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4625 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,5920 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0937

JPY

Japanese yen

140,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89250

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3323

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9989

ISK

Iceland króna

153,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9783

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,725

HUF

Hungarian forint

386,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6920

RON

Romanian leu

4,9020

TRY

Turkish lira

20,5806

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5499

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4616

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5802

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6886

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4331

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,17

ZAR

South African rand

18,7624

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3689

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 312,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6570

PHP

Philippine peso

58,721

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,114

BRL

Brazilian real

5,5414

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4625

INR

Indian rupee

89,5920

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of News Communications, Inc. ("NCI") on
Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
A. Finkelstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of NCI, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/    James A. Finkelstein
---------------------------
Name: James A. Finkelstein
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 20, 2005
reviews the district court's findings of fact for substantial evidence. In re 

Parental Rights as to A.L., 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 91, 337 P.3d 758, 761 

(2014). 

Substantial evidence supports the district court's findings of 

parental fault. Both parties agree that appellant had not seen the 

children since 2008, had not made an effort to keep in touch with 

respondent or the children between 2008 and 2011, and had paid no child 

support except for an IRS tax return intercept. This undisputed evidence 

supports the district court's findings that appellant abandoned the 

children, made only token efforts to communicate with the children, and 

made no effort to support the children, and thus, that parental fault 

grounds existed under NRS 128.105(2)(a) and (f)(1). See NRS 128.012 

(defining abandonment of a child for parental fault purposes). 

Substantial evidence also supports the district court's finding 

that terminating appellant's rights would serve the children's best 

interest. See NRS 128.105(1). The district court concluded that 

terminating appellant's rights would promote stability in the children's 

lives, strengthen their family unit, and best serve the continuing needs of 

the children for mental and emotional growth and development. 

Respondent testified that the children do not know appellant, and that 

reintroducing her to them would be psychologically damaging and cause 

negative behavior in the children. He explained that the older child had a 

pervasive developmental disorder which would cause irreparable damage 

if appellant came back into his life and left again. Respondent testified 

that based on appellant's past behavior he was concerned that if 

appellant's rights were not terminated she would exercise visitation for a 

short period of time and then disappear, which would cause behavioral 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A )9M0 
problems and psychological damage to both children. Appellant's past 

depression and drug use, inability to follow through with a court-ordered 

psychological evaluation, and three-year delay in seeking to reunite with 

the children even after becoming clean, lends credence to these concerns. 

Appellant sought to rebut respondent's testimony, testifying that she was 

seeking treatment for her depression and would be a stable figure in the 

children's lives. This court, however, will not reweigh on appeal the 

credibility of witnesses. Castle v. Simmons, 120 Nev. 98, 103, 86 P.3d 

1042, 1046 (2004) (providing that the duty of weighing witness credibility 

'rests within the trier of fact's sound discretion"). Taken in sum, the 

record provides substantial evidence supporting the district court's finding 

that the children's best interest would be served by terminating 

appellant's parental rights. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. James E Wilson, District Judge 

Robert B. Walker 

Robert A. Grayson 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 5148 5096 5146 5124 5007 4226 3986 4722 5089 5086 5237 5313

2002 5619 5528 5415 5502 5437 4563 4332 4905 5244 5355 5384 5467

2003 5850 5868 5937 5822 5816 4973 4853 5346 5899 5980 6020 6081

2004 6035 6136 6153 6143 6003 5298 4886 5255 5883 5974 6051 6109

2005 6293 6230 6070 6113 5915 5184 5000 5474 6182 6263 6297 6419

2006 6480 6451 6412 6349 6226 5271 5106 5674 6416 6443 6360 6451

2007 6671 6662 6682 6703 6672 5823 5653 6151 6604 6590 6622 6579

2008 6819 6785 6863 6774 6407 5848 5642 6255 6764 6828 7038 6950

2009 7002 6806 6898 7007 6723 6092 5845 6308 6817 6984 7077 7041

2010 7152 7138 7065 7026 6982 6443 6122 6583 7183 7175 7265 7182

2011 7260 7283 7147 7098

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

16 to 17 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05000086

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 16-17 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:33 PM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

4932

5229

5704

5827

5953

6136

6451

6581

6717

6943

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:33 PM)
#### § 1208.65 Failure to timely request a hearing.

If FHFA receives a debtor's written request for a hearing after 15 business days of the date FHFA mailed its notice of intent to seek garnishment, FHFA shall provide a hearing to the debtor. However, FHFA will not delay issuance of a withholding order unless it determines that the untimely filing of the request was caused by factors over which the debtor had no control, or FHFA receives information that FHFA believes justifies a delay or cancellation of the withholding order.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A ug. 25, 2008 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] IN THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 13394 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 06 -001 09 -C R -1-1 U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s J O E H I L L S , J R ., D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rnD is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( A u gu s t25, 2008) B efo re B IR C H , D U B IN A an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: M i chae lN . L oebl , coun se lfor J oe H i l l s, Jr . i n thi s di re ctcr i m i nalappeal , has2

m ov ed t o w i thd raw fr om further r epre se nt at i on of the appel l antand fi l ed a bri ef pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 (1 9 6 7 ). O u r in d ep en d en t rev iew o f th e e n ti re re co rdre v ea ls th at co u n se l’ s a s s e s s m e ntof

the r e l at i ve m e r i tof

the appe a li s c orr e c t . B e c aus e i nde pe nde nt ex am in atio n o f th e e n ti re re co rdre v ea ls n o ar g u ab le issu es o f m er it , co u n se l’ s m o t i o n t o w i th draw i s G R A N TED , and H i l l s’ s c on vi ct i on and sent ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.1



                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Casino Data Systems:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-62108), (No. 33-84236) and (33-97386) on Form S-8 of Casino Data
Systems of our reports dated March 24, 1998 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Casino Data Systems and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and all related schedules, which reports appear in the
December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Casino Data Systems.


                                    /S/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Las Vegas, Nevada
March 30, 1998
§ 1777.2 Preservation of other authority. ( a ) *Supervisory standards.* Notwithstanding the existence of procedures in § 1777.10 for the Director of OFHEO to designate certain developments for supervisory response under subpart A of this part, nothing in this part in any way limits the authority of OFHEO otherwise to take such actions with respect to any issue as is deemed appropriate by the Director of OFHEO to ensure that the Enterprises maintain adequate capital, operate in a safe and sound manner, and comply with the 1992 Act and regulations, orders, and agreements thereunder.
( b ) *Capital floor.* Classification of an Enterprise as adequately capitalized in accordance with subtitle B of the 1992 Act and subpart B of this part indicates that the Enterprise meets the capital levels under sections 1361 and 1362 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611 and 4612) and regulations promulgated thereunder as of the times specified in the classification determination. Nothing in subpart B of this part or subtitle B of the 1992 Act limits OFHEO's authority otherwise to address circumstances that would require additional capital through regulations, orders, notices, guidance, or other actions.
( c ) *Form of supervisory action or response.* In addition to the supervisory responses contemplated under subpart A of this part, and the authority to classify and reclassify the Enterprises, to issue orders, and to appoint conservators under subpart B of this part, the 1992 Act grants OFHEO broad discretion to take such other supervisory actions as may be deemed by OFHEO to be appropriate, including issuing temporary and permanent cease and desist orders, imposing civil money penalties, appointing a conservator under section 1369(a)(1) through (2) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4619(a)(1) through (2)), entering into a written agreement the violation of which is actionable through enforcement proceedings, or entering into any other formal or informal agreement with an Enterprise. Neither the 1992 Act nor this part in any way limit OFHEO's discretion over the selection of the type of these actions, and the selection of one type of action under this part or under these other statutory authorities, or a combination thereof, does not foreclose OFHEO from pursuing any other action.