alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023030EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/8 |

---

Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2)

Establishment of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 ([OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2006_210_R_TOC)))

(2023/C 30/08)

I. 1)   Name, address and contact point:

Registered name: Európske zoskupenie územnej spolupráce Veľká Morava s ručením obmedzeným

Registered office:Starohájska 10, 917 01 Trnava, SR

Contact point: Július Fekiač (director)

I. 2)   Duration of the grouping:

Duration of the grouping: unlimited

Date of registration:30.11.2022

II.   OBJECTIVES

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | development of the economic, social and territorial cohesion of its members in the framework of cross-border cooperation in the territory in which the grouping operates (i.e. the administrative area of the founding and acceding members of the grouping) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | strategic management of the regional development of the territory concerned |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | development of cooperation between its members, in accordance with their competences, in particular in the following areas: | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | Infrastructure | | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Energy | | | | | --- | --- | | 3. | Information technology | | | | | --- | --- | | 4. | Regional development | | | | | --- | --- | | 5. | Tourism | | | | | --- | --- | | 6. | Education | | | | | --- | --- | | 7. | Culture and sport | | | | | --- | --- | | 8. | Social sphere and healthcare | | | | | --- | --- | | 9. | Development of small and medium-sized enterprises | | | | | --- | --- | | 10. | Environmental protection and agriculture | | | | | --- | --- | | 11. | Rural development | | | | | --- | --- | | 12. | Crisis management | | | | | --- | --- | | 13. | Cybersecurity and information security | | | | | --- | --- | | 14. | Cross-border cooperation | | | | | --- | --- | | 15. | Transport | | | | | --- | --- | | 16. | Strengthening research, technological development and innovation. | |

III.   ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON NAME OF THE GROUPING

Name in English: EGTC Great Moravia with Limited Liability

IV.   MEMBERS

IV. 1)   Total number of members in the grouping: 2

IV. 2)   Nationalities of the members of the grouping: Czech and Slovak

IV. 3)   Member information

Official name: Trnavský samosprávny kraj

Postal address:Starohájska 10, 917 01 Trnava, SR

Internet address: www.trnava-vuc.sk

Type of member: Regional authority

Official name: Jihomoravský kraj

Postal address:Žerotínovo náměstí 449/3, 601 82 Brno, ČR

Internet address: www.jmk.cz

Type of member: Regional authority

---
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

5600 Sand Lake Road Orlando, Florida 32819-8907

Exemption Letter for § 91.121: Altimeter Settings:

4/13/2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

FAA Rule Making Office (ARM), Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590

Mr. Jim Ryan,

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC) is re-applying for a special airworthiness 

certificate “Experimental Category” for its unmanned aircraft system (UAS). LMMFC proposes 

to operate the UAS at its corporate owned test facility (ETS Test Site) near Orlando, Florida. 

Presently, 14 CFR 91.121 states:

§ 91.121 Altimeter settings. 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, 

as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating—

Current configuration of the UAS does not permit installation of an altimeter to meet the 

minimum requirements of 14 CFR 91.121. The UAS has a digital telemetry altimeter made by 

Spektrum (SPMA9575) electronics to measure above ground level altitudes. Advanced software 

allows the processor to compute for variation in temperature and displays above ground level 

altitude via handheld device (apple software). The Spektrum altimeter is certified and tested by 

the manufacture. LMMFC procedure limits flight testing altitude to 1000’ AGL, and requires the 

aircraft to remain within line of sight (LOS). LMMFC is requesting exemption from 14 CFR 

91.121; considering current configuration and operational limitations previously accepted by the 

FAA. This exemption poses no risk to general public safety.

Please contact me if you require additional information:

4/16/2015

X Jacob A. Senior

Orlando Aviation Consultants

P.O. Box 621295, Orlando FL 32862

Signed by: Jacob Senior (affiliate)
# C_2022139EN.01000201.xml

| 29.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 March 2022

(2022/C 139/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0966 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83643 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4225 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0257 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5123 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,650 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 374,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7180 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9483 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,2750 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4590 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3702 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5861 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5838 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4921 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 342,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9925 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9862 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5735 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 737,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6238 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,080 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,027 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2133 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9841 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,4825 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0966

JPY

Japanese yen

135,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83643

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4225

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0257

ISK

Iceland króna

142,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5123

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,650

HUF

Hungarian forint

374,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7180

RON

Romanian leu

4,9483

TRY

Turkish lira

16,2750

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4590

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3702

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5861

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5838

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4921

KRW

South Korean won

1 342,49

ZAR

South African rand

15,9925

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9862

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5735

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 737,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6238

PHP

Philippine peso

57,080

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,027

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2133

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9841

INR

Indian rupee

83,4825

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1091.402 Time limits.

In computing any period of time prescribed by this part, or by order of the Director, the date of the act or event that commences the designated period of time is not included. The last day so computed is included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a). When the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays are included in the computation of time, except when the time period within which an act is to be performed is ten days or less. Changes to time limits are addressed in § 1091.404.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule contains summary information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the six month period ended August
31, 1997.  Information contained in this Financial Data Schedule is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     64,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,799
<PP&E>                                         398,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          946,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,418
<OTHER-SE>                                   (325,745)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,318
<SALES>                                      2,720,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,721,348
<CGS>                                          741,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,197,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (497,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (497,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (497,222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 40.13 Waiver.

In an emergency, the Secretary may waive any provision of these regulations.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut, as the ‘‘Barbara B. Kennelly

Post Office Building’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 141 Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut,

as the ‘‘Barbara B. Kennelly Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2746 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 141 Weston Street in Hartford, Connecticut,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Barbara B. Ken5 nelly Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Barbara B. Kennelly Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
41878.

#### NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE COMPANY v. FULTON NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA et al.

Decided November 3, 1966.

*Harmon & Thackston, Nolan B. Harmon, G. William Thackston, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Theodore G. Frankel, Gerald A. Friedlander, Clarence C. Calhoun, Jr.,*for appellees.

Hall, Judge.

This court in its previous opinion deplored the confusion, if not conflict, in judicial precedents deciding whether a contract in dispute was one of suretyship or guaranty. *National Acceptance Co. v. Fulton Nat. Bank,*113 Ga. App. 517, 518 (148 SE2d 907). We relied upon the language of the Supreme Court in *Greenwold Grift Co. v. Durham,*191 Ga. 586 (13 SE2d 346), wherein it stated: “An undertaking by which one induces the subsequent furnishing of goods to a third person . . . has been recognized as an independent contract of guaranty and not of suretyship. . . .” The Supreme Court now holds that in order to create a contract of guaranty there must be a “new, separate and independent consideration” flowing directly to the promisor.

Our judgment in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court in *Wolkin v. National Acceptance Co.,*222 Ga. 487 (150 SE2d 831), we hereby vacate our judgment and enter another affirming the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in its opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of TecScan International,  Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Michael Meservy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Michael Meservy
Michael Meservy
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


October 14, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
January 16, 1997 

       Securities and Exchange Commission 
       450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
       Washington, D.C. 20549 

            Re:  Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. 
                    Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ending July 31, 1996
                    SEC file no.  0-17378 

       Dear Sir or Madam:

Transmitted herewith through the EDGAR system is Form 10-QSB for the quarter 
ended  July  31, 1996 for Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.  Should you have any 
questions or comments concerning this matter please contact the undersigned at 
303-794-2000.



       Sincerely, 



       Roger Hurst 
       President 


<PAGE>
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Sao Tome and Principe (22-618) – Extension and Amendment of Agreement for the Operation of Radio Transmission Facilities

# 									Sao Tome and Principe (22-618) – Extension and Amendment of Agreement for the Operation of Radio Transmission Facilities							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 18, 2022

Telecommunication: Radio Transmissions Facilities

Signed at Sao Tome June 18, 2022; entered into force June 18, 2022.

Extension of Agreement signed May 22, 1992: TIAS 97-214.
Download Agreement						 [840 KB]

Tags

Sao Tome and PrincipeTelecommunicationsTreaties

Back to Top
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Frontier Energy Corp.
(the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Robert Genesi, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge
that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
Robert Genesi
 
 Robert
Genesi
 Principal
Executive Officer
 Principal
Financial Officer
 
 Dated:
November 21, 2005
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Frontier Energy Corp. and will be retained by Frontier Energy Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,730,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,167,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,206,000
<PP&E>                                         414,271,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (50,134,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,626,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,796,000
<BONDS>                                        233,903,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,162,000
<COMMON>                                           119,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,643,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   403,626,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,726,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,323,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,397,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,436,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (430,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (430,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (986,000)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,416,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NESTOR PAUL HERNANDEZMORALES, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-72198 Agency No. A074-319-906
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 6, 2012 ** Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) did not err in finding that Hernandez was statutorily ineligible for an adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255. Because Hernandez entered the Un ited States illegally, he does not meet 

# FILED
JUN 08 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 the requirement of § 1255(a) that an alie n be “inspected and admitted or paroled” into the country. Hernandez does not otherwise qualify as having been “grandfathered” into the statute. See 8 C.F.R. § 1245.10; Landin-Molina v. Holder , 580 F.3d 913, 915-17 (9th Cir. 2009). 2. Hernandez was also not eligible for nunc pro tunc permission to reapply for admission. Because Hernandez illegally returned to the United States and remained in the country after ha ving been deported, the BIA properly concluded that he was among a class of “ illegal entrants” who were “inadmissible for being present without admission or parole.” 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A). 3. The BIA did not err in finding Hernandez had failed to establish extraordinary circumstances excusing his untimely filing as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D). The failure of the border offi cials to refer him to an asylum officer or immigration judge in 2007, two years before his most recent reentry, does not rise to the level of an extraordinary circumstance. Similarly, the officers’ actions di d not constitute affirmative misconduct which would subject the government to e quitable estoppel. Hernandez must show more than official negligence, and not hing in the record suggests the officers engaged in a “deliberate lie” or “pattern of false promises.” See Socop-Gonzalez v. INS , 272 F.3d 1176, 1184 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).3 4. We lack jurisdiction to consider Hernandez’s contention that the immigration judge violated his right to due process and confrontation of witnesses. Hernandez’s counsel waived the claim before the IJ and also failed to exhaust the issue before the BIA. Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004). PETITION DENIED.
#### § 1805.500 Matching funds—general.

All financial assistance awarded under this part shall be matched with funds from sources other than the Federal government. Except as provided in § 1805.502, such matching funds shall be provided on the basis of not less than one dollar for each dollar provided by the CDFI Fund. Funds that have been used to satisfy a legal requirement for obtaining funds under either the CDFI Program or another Federal grant or award program may not be used to satisfy the matching requirements described in this section. Community Development Block Grant Program and other funds provided pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5301 *et seq.*), shall be considered Federal government funds and shall not be used to meet the matching requirements. Matching funds shall be used as provided in the applicable Notice of Funds Availability and/or the corresponding Assistance Agreement. Funds that are used prior to the execution of the Assistance Agreement may nevertheless qualify as matching funds provided they were used as provided in the applicable Notice of Funds Availability and/or Assistance Agreement.
§ 14.10 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *General rule.* This part establishes consumer protections in connection with retail sales practices, solicitations, advertising, or offers of any insurance product or annuity to a consumer by: ( 1 ) Any national bank or Federal savings association; or
( 2 ) Any other person that is engaged in such activities at an office of the national bank or Federal savings association, or on behalf of the national bank or Federal savings association.
( b ) *Application to operating subsidiaries.* For purposes of § 5.34(e)(3) of this chapter for national banks and § 5.38(e)(3) of this chapter for Federal savings associations, an operating subsidiary is subject to this part only to the extent that it sells, solicits, advertises, or offers insurance products or annuities at an office of a national bank or Federal savings association, or on behalf of a national bank or Federal savings association.
[79 FR 28398, May 16, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 28472, May 18, 2015]