alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 70.31 Deductibles. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 10037 , Feb. 16, 2023.
Cross Reference
This amendment was delayed until Feb. 16, 2025, at 88 FR 90120 , Dec. 29, 2023.
( a ) VA shall deduct an amount established by the Secretary for each one-way trip from the amount otherwise payable under this part for such one-way trip, except that: ( 1 ) VA shall not deduct any amounts in a calendar month after the completion of six one-way trips for which deductions were made in such calendar month, and
( 2 ) Whenever the Secretary adjusts the mileage rates as a result of the investigation described in § 70.30(a)(1)(iv), the Secretary shall, effective on the date such mileage rate change should occur, adjust proportionally the deductible amount in effect at the time of the adjustment. If a determination is made that a change is warranted, the new deductible(s) will be published in the notice section of the Federal Register. Current deductible(s) can be found at *http://www.va.gov/healtheligibility/Library/pubs/BeneficiaryTravel/BeneficiaryTravel.pdf* or by contacting the Beneficiary Travel office at the closest VA health care facility.
( b ) The provisions under this section for making deductions shall not apply to: ( 1 ) Travel that includes travel by a special mode of transportation,
( 2 ) Travel to a VA facility for a scheduled compensation and pension examination, and
( 3 ) Travel by a non-veteran.
( c ) VA shall waive the deductible under this section when it would cause the beneficiary severe financial hardship. For purposes of this section, severe financial hardship occurs if the beneficiary: ( 1 ) Is in receipt of a VA pension;
( 2 ) Has income for the year prior to the year in which application is made pursuant to § 70.20 that does not exceed the household income threshold determined under 38 U.S.C. 1722(a) (the current income thresholds can be found at *http://www.va.gov/healtheligibility/Library/pubs/VAIncomeThresholds/VAIncomeThresholds.pdf*); or
( 3 ) Has circumstances in the year the application is made pursuant to § 70.20 that cause his or her projected income not to exceed the household income threshold determined under 38 U.S.C. 1722(a).
( d ) Waivers granted under this section are valid: ( 1 ) Through the end of the calendar year of the application made pursuant to § 70.20; or
( 2 ) Until there is a change in the beneficiary's household income during the calendar year of the application made pursuant to § 70.20 that results in the beneficiary no longer meeting the terms of paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) A beneficiary granted a waiver under this section must promptly inform VA of any household income status change during the waiver period that results in the beneficiary no longer meeting the terms of paragraph (c) of this section.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection provisions in this section under control number 2900-0091) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 111, 501, 1701, 1714, 1720, 1728, 1782, 1783, E.O. 11302)
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK, GENERAL TERM,

JUNE, 1900.

#### Louis F. Dommerich, Respondent, *v.*Morris Garfunkel et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

Henry L. Franklin, for appellants.

Max D. Steuer, for respondent.

McCarthy, P. J.

The action was commenced to recover $655.62 for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants, between the 21st day of September, and the 22d day of October, 1897, both days inclusive. The defendants, by their answer, admit all the allegations contained in the complaint, but as a defense and counterclaim they allege “ that the said goods mentioned and described in the complaint were sold to the defendants and represented by the plaintiff to be good and merchantable cloths, fit to be manufactured into cloaks for ordinary wear and *741use, and that defendants, relying on said representations agreed to purchase and did purchase the same from the plaintiff.”

Then the defendants allege that the goods were not of the kind or quality represented, hut that they were of a very much inferior quality, to be manufactured for the purpose mentioned, and that by reason thereof defendants suffered damage to the amount of $975, which they plead as an offset or counterclaim.

The sole question, therefore, is, Did the defendants prove a cause of action for a breach of warranty against the plaintiff ? If they proved such a cause of action the judgment must be reversed, for the dismissal of the counterclaim and the direction of-the verdict in favor of the plaintiff would then be error. If the defendants failed to prove their cause of action for breach of warranty against the plaintiff the judgment in this case must be affirmed.

It will be observed that the defendants allege that the warranty was made with respect to the goods mentioned and described in the complaint, and those goods were sold between the 21st of September, and the 22d day of October, 1897.

The warranty pleaded is a specific one that the “ goods were merchantable and fit to be manufactured into cloaks for ordinary wear.”

The warranty attempted to be proved was that the goods were equal to those purchased in the preceding July. While it was perfectly competent to prove such a warranty if it had been pleaded, it was quite incompetent to prove it in the absence of such a plea, hence the offers of proof as to the July goods were properly excluded, so also were the offers of proof of custom properly excluded, for under the pleadings and proofs they were immaterial.

The warranty pleaded was not proved and hence the verdict directed was right and the judgment entered thereon must he affirmed, with costs.

O’Dwyer, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# C_2022183EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 May 2022

(2022/C 183/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0531 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84194 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3968 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0324 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9042 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,644 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 377,55 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9470 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,5769 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4780 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3498 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2655 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6333 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4559 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6489 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9594 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5499 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 201,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5847 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,260 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,137 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2400 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2947 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,4035 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0531

JPY

Japanese yen

136,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84194

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3968

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0324

ISK

Iceland króna

137,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9042

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,644

HUF

Hungarian forint

377,55

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6875

RON

Romanian leu

4,9470

TRY

Turkish lira

15,5769

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4780

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3498

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2655

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6333

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4559

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,45

ZAR

South African rand

16,6489

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9594

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5499

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 201,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5847

PHP

Philippine peso

55,260

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,137

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2400

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2947

INR

Indian rupee

80,4035

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE I, John A. Edwardson, the chief executive officer of CDW Corporation (CDW), certify that (i)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the 10-K) of CDW fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CDW. /s/ John A. EdwardsonJohn A. EdwardsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerCDW CorporationMarch 15, 2005
#### The People ex rel. Oscar C. Wood, Relator, *v.*The Board of Town Canvassers, etc., of the Town of Randolph, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Chautauqua Special Term,

July, 1900.)

Liquor Tax Law — Local option — Errors of biennial town . meeting cured by action of special town meeting — Mandamus.

Where a special town meeting has duly and regularly passed upon the question of local option, errors committed in the submission of those questions to a prior biennial town meeting may he deemed to have been rectified, and, therefore, the court will not compel the board of canvassers to reconvene and reject the local option ballots which were cast at the biennial town meeting.

This is an application for a writ of peremptory mandamus requiring the respondents to reconvene and reject all ballots cast by the electors of the town of Randolph at the election of 1899 upon the subject of local option in said town.

Wentworth *&*Wentworth and Norman M. Allen, for relator.

Benjamin P. Congdon, for respondents.

White, J.

The moving papers and the affidavits filed, on behalf of the respondents show that the electors of the town of Randolph voted upon the local option questions provided for by the Liquor Tax Law, at the biennial town meeting' in 1899; that those questions were not at that meeting submitted to or voted upon by said electors in the manner prescribed by law, and the result thereof may he assumed to have been void.

Because of the recognized irregularities in the first' submission of the questions, a special town meeting was duly called and held on May 1, 1900, at which said questions were regularly submitted and voted upon and the result thereof declared according to law.

It seems clear to me that the electors, having remedied such irregularities in the manner prescribed by the statute, no effect *132is to *he given to the*irregular votes at the regular meeting in 1899, nor to the result of that meeting as declared, and for that reason the motion for the writ of mandamus should be denied, with ten dollars costs to the respondents.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs to respondents.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Cambodia

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Cambodia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Cambodia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Cambodia

During the review period, the government made significant progress by auditing the government’s executed budget and making the report publicly available within a reasonable period.  The government made its enacted budget available online but did not publish an executive budget proposal or end-of-year report within a reasonable period.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available.  The budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s expenditures and revenue streams, including natural resource revenues.  Significant deviations between projected and actual revenues during the review period, however, undercut the reliability of budget information.  Debt obligations of state-owned enterprises were not disclosed.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence.  The government did not specify in law or regulation the criteria and procedures for natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.  The government instead relied on ad hoc negotiations to award contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not publicly available.

Cambodia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing its executive budget proposal and end-of-year report within a reasonable period;
- Producing and publishing a supplemental budget when actual revenues and expenditures do not correspond to those in the enacted budget;
- Publishing debt obligations of state-owned enterprises;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- Specifying in law or regulation the procedures and criteria by which the government awards natural resource extraction contracts or licenses and ensuring such laws or regulations are followed in practice; and
- Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Cambodia 

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsCambodiaDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000793169
<NAME> EASTERN BANCORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          32,567
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         580,823
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,901
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         269,414
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           260,817
<LOANS>                                        486,932
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 865,818
<DEPOSITS>                                     639,642
<SHORT-TERM>                                    26,113
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,976
<LONG-TERM>                                    127,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 865,818
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,909
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,909
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,744
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,025
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,884
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,393
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,483
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,483
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.03
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,192
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 6,403
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,056
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,906
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      160
<RECOVERIES>                                        32
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,828
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,828
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| */s/              Ben-Tsur Joseph*                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Ben-Tsur                JosephChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:                August 14, 2008   |   |   |   |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 51579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20874]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel; Correction

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities, National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities published a document 
in the Federal Register of August 14, 2012, concerning notice of 
meetings of the Humanities Panel during the month of September 2012. 
Two of the meetings have been cancelled and rescheduled as one meeting. 
All other information in the notice remains the same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, at (202) 606-8322.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 14, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-19899, 
on page 48553, in the first and second columns, remove items 9 and 10 
and replace with:
    9. Date: September 24, 2012.
     Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
     Room: 315. This meeting will discuss applications for the Bridging 
Cultures at Community Colleges: Request for Proposals for a Cooperative 
Agreement program, submitted to the Division of Education Programs.

    Dated: August 20, 2012.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-20874 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 97-50056

_____________________

KELLY S. RODGERS; RUTH C. WHITEHURST, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus FRANKLIN FEDERAL BANCORP, FSB, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

(A-96-CV-82)

_________________________________________________________________ September 11, 1997 Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
After a review of the record, a s tudy of the briefs, and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel, we agree with the district court that the plaintiffs failed to prove, with respect to each of them, that the defendant engaged in either gender discrimination or unlawful retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Consequently, judgment is2 A F F I R M E D.
§ 1410.1 Purpose and scope. This part sets forth the rules for: ( a ) The calculation of premiums;
( b ) The time for payment of the premium required by sections 5.55 and 5.56 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended;
( c ) Interest charges on delinquent payments;
( d ) The form and content of certified statements; and,
( e ) Documentation supporting certified statements.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 24, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: August 13, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

Karl Brooks of EPA gave a summary presentation on August 13, 2014, during the Iowa 

Association of Business and Industry annual policy meeting. The majority of the presentation

centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Karl Brooks

Mark A. Smith

Other Attendees included members of Iowa 

Association of Business and Industryattendee list not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for PruTech Research and
                    Development Partnership III and is qualified 
                    in its entirety by reference to such 
                    financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000794357
<NAME>              PruTech Research and
                    Development Partnership III
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          4,577,473

<SECURITIES>                    3,338,296

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,915,769

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           249,399

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      7,666,370

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,915,769

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,742,050

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                756,990

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    4,985,060

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   109.60

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>