alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1073.307 Voluntary repayment agreements as alternative to salary offset where the CFPB is the creditor agency. ( a ) In response to a Notice of Intent, an employee may propose to voluntarily repay the debt through scheduled voluntary payments, in lieu of salary offset. An employee who wishes to repay a debt in this manner shall submit to the Bureau a written agreement proposing a repayment schedule. This proposal must be received by the Bureau within 30 calendar days following the date of the Notice of Intent.
( b ) The Director shall notify the employee whether the employee's proposed voluntary repayment agreement is acceptable. It is within the discretion of the Director whether to accept or reject the debtor's proposal, or whether to propose to the debtor a modification of the proposed repayment agreement: ( 1 ) If the Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is unacceptable, he or she shall notify the employee and the employee shall have 30 calendar days from the date he or she received notice of the decision in which to file a request for a hearing on the proposed repayment agreement, as provided in § 1073.303; or
( 2 ) If the Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is acceptable or the debtor agrees to a modification proposed by the Director, the agreement shall be put in writing and signed by both the employee and the Director.
#### § 17.242 Coordination of programs with Department of Health and Human Services.

Programs for sharing specialized medical resources or medical information services shall be coordinated to a maximum extent practicable, with programs carried out under part F, title XVI of the Public Health Service Act under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health and Human Services.

[32 FR 6842, May 4, 1967, as amended at 45 FR 6940, Jan. 31, 1980; 47 FR 58250, Dec. 30, 1982. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
#### § 1272.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Business Day* means any calendar day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or legal public holiday listed in 5 U.S.C. 6103.

*NBA Notice Date* means the date on which FHFA receives a new business activity notice.

*New business activity (NBA)* means any business activity undertaken, transacted, conducted, or engaged in by a Bank that entails material risks not previously managed by the Bank. A Bank's acceptance of a new type of advance collateral does not constitute an NBA.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND SUPPLEMENT TO 

SECURITIES PURCHASE AMENDMENT 

Dated April 24, 2015 
 The
undersigned parties hereby amend that certain Amendment, Modification and Supplement to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2015, as amended on April 8, 2015, (the “Amendment”) by and among Medbox,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Redwood Management, LLC (also acting on behalf of Redwood Fund III Ltd., Redwood Fund II LLC and RDW Capital, LLC) (the “Purchaser”) as of the date hereof as follows:

 1. The parties agree and acknowledge that on or about April 24, 2015, an additional Tranche in the aggregate
Principal Amount of $175,000 was closed and is be deemed to be a separate, “Modified Closing” under the Amendment. 

2. The Parties agree and acknowledge that the Fixed Conversion Price of all Debentures pursuant to Section 4(b)(a) thereof
is $0.88 as a result of Dilutive Issuances under Section 5(b) of the Debentures. 
 All other figures, terms and conditions in the
Amendment shall remain unchanged. 
 This amendment may be executed in counterpart, all of which when taken together shall be considered one
and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to each other party. 
  

					
			MEDBOX, INC.
			
			By:		  

			Name:		Doug Mitchell
			Title:		Chief Financial Officer
	
	 REDWOOD MANAGEMENT, LLC (on behalf of itself and Redwood Fund III Ltd., Redwood Fund II LLC and RDW Capital, LLC)

			
			By:		  

			Name:		John DeNobile
			Title:		Manager
#### Emely Sickles, Plaintiff, *v.*Abram H. Kling, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,

July, 1900.)

Case — The title of the cause need appear but once.

In preparing a case on appeal, the title of the action need be written and printed but once, and all papers and proceedings should then follow under proper sub-headings.

The settlement of a case on appeal.

Ferdinand E. M. Bullowa for plaintiff.

Charles E. Thorn for defendant.

*166Gaynor, J.:

In preparing a proposed case on appeal the title to the action should be written and printed only once, and then all papers and proceedings should follow thereunder, and under proper sub-headings. It is very useless, and indeed quite absurd, to keep on repeating the title. A large part of bulky appeal books consists of repetitions of the title of the action. And there are many other things which can be omitted, such as verifications, and the like, merely noting their existence or substance, unless, of course, the appeal involves some point concerning them. The numerous proposed \amendments herein to repeat the title of the action at the head of each paper and so on, must be disallowed.

Amendments disallowed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1858-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1858-DR), dated September 24, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 25, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of  September 24, 2009.

Walker County for Individual Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator,  Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-23959 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 10.11

               PARTIAL LEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT

	WHEREAS, 488 Main Avenue Associates, LLC ("Landlord") and
Electronic Retailing Systems International, Inc. ("Tenant") are
parties to a Lease Agreement dated May, 1997 and an Amendment
No. 1 to Lease Agreement dated July, 1997 (together referred to
as the "Lease"); and

	WHEREAS, pursuant to the Lease, Tenant rents from Landlord
premises on the second floor of the building; and

	WHEREAS, one of the spaces Tenant rents from Landlord on
the second floor is designated as a portion of Area #1 in the
Lease and is designated as the "Expressway" space and is
stipulated to be 2,455 rentable square feet ("Premises #1"); and

	WHEREAS, another of the spaces Tenant rents from Landlord
on the second floor is designated as Area #2 in the Lease and is
designated as the "ABC" space and is stipulated to be 1,460
rentable square feet ("Premises #2"); and

	WHEREAS, Tenant is desirous of Landlord taking back the two
said premises and Landlord is willing to do so pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the herein Partial Lease Termination
Agreement;

	IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Tenant shall deliver both of said premises to the
Landlord, clean and vacant of any of Tenant's personalty,
on or before February 1, 2000.

2. That effective March 1, 2000, Tenant shall have no further
obligation as to Premises #1 and the Lease shall be
terminated with respect to said premises.

3. That effective June 1, 2000, Tenant shall have no further
obligation as to Premises #2 and the Lease shall be
terminated with respect to said premises.

4. That simultaneous with the execution of the herein
Agreement, Tenant will remit to Landlord a check for Ten
Thousand ($10,000) Dollars.




<PAGE>
5. It is the intent of the herein Agreement to terminate the
Lease only as to the two said premises on the second floor
and it is agreed that all other terms and conditions of the
Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

Dated: January 27, 2000


s/James Randel					                   s/Jerry McAuliffe
--------------------------	          	---------------------------
488 Main Avenue Associates, LLC	      Electronic Retailing Systems
                                       International, Inc.
By: James Randel 				                 By:
Its: Managing Member			               Its:
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Somalia

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Somalia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Somalia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Somalia

During the review period, the government made significant progress by reviewing its budget throughout the fiscal year.  The government published its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report online within a reasonable period.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available, including online.  Budget documents were substantially complete.  The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to audit or oversight.  While actual revenues and expenditures may have deviated from projections, the government issued a revised supplemental budget.  The supreme audit institution produced a publicly available review of the government’s accounts.  The supreme audit institution was not fully established in law or statute and did not meet international standards of independence but did publish comprehensive and timely audit reports that contained substantive findings.  The government specified in law the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses and followed those regulations in practice.  The government made basic information on natural resource extraction publicly available.

Somalia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Eliminating off-budget accounts or subjecting them to adequate oversight and audit; and

- Ensuring the supreme audit institution is established in law or statute and meets international standards of independence.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Somalia 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSomalia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 92006          Scale: 1,089,900          Edition: 5          Edition Date: 13-MAR-99          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1999/32**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
#### § 150.500 How much must I deposit if I administer fiduciary assets in more than one state?

If you administer fiduciary assets in more than one state, you must compute the amount of deposit required for each state on the basis of fiduciary assets that you administer primarily from offices located in that state.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00316-CV

IN THE MATTER OF D.D., A JUVENILE

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 313-J-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

D.D. filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a). 

The motion states that the D.D. was “discharged from the Placement facility ordered by 

the court and [D.D.] was released from Probation; therefore, there is no need to appeal 

the previous order of the trial court as the subsequent trial court’s order discharging from 

probation grants the relief that would have been requested on appeal.” Dismissal of this 

appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be 

entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 
In the Matter of D.D. Page 2

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 15, 2017

[CV06]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GERALD S. LEPRE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 142 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of October , 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Andretti Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: March 17, 2022  By: /s/ William J. Sandbrook   **William J. Sandbrook**   **Chief Executive Officer**   **(Principal Executive Officer)**
 

 
3 

**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 50913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23917]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 50913]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2009-31 of September 29, 
                2009

                
 Presidential Determination On the Delegation of 
                Certifications Under Section 1512 of Public Law 105-261

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce

                By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of Title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions of 
                the President under section 1512 of the National 
                Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (NDAA).

                In the performance of your responsibility under this 
                memorandum, you shall consult, as appropriate, the 
                heads of other executive departments and agencies.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 29, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-23917
Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3510-BP-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_____ ____________________________________

Clerk September 28, 2009

0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138378

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 138378

COA: 280523

Kalamazoo CC: 06

- 001743

- FC

MARVIN TAWON ALLEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C ourt, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 42.29 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or representative for— ( 1 ) Failing to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may— ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with the order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon, testimony relating to the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with the request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the ALJ may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief or other document which is not filed in a timely fashion.
§ 1217.4 Investigation. ( a ) *General.* FHFA may initiate an action under chapter 38 of subtitle III of title 31, U.S.C., and this part against a respondent only upon an investigation by the investigating official.
( b ) *Subpoena.* Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3804(a), the investigating official may require by subpoena the production of records and other documents. The subpoena shall state the authority under which it is issued, identify the records sought, and name the person designated to receive the records. The recipient of the subpoena shall provide a certification that the documents sought have been produced, that the documents are not available and the reasons they are not available, or that the documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( c ) *Investigation report.* If the investigating official concludes that an action under chapter 38 of subtitle III of title 31, U.S.C., and this part may be warranted, the investigating official shall prepare a report containing the findings and conclusions of the investigation, including: ( 1 ) A description of the claim or statement at issue;
( 2 ) The evidence supporting the allegations;
( 3 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in violation of § 1217.3; and
( 4 ) Any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claim or statement.
( d ) *Referrals to the Attorney General.* The investigating official may refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for civil relief under other applicable law, as appropriate, or may defer or postpone submitting a report to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

February 24, 2011

Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director

Maryland Department of the Environment

Air and Radiation Management Administration

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21230

Dear Mr. Aburn:

 On December 15, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department of the

Environment (MDE). The SIP revision pertains to the adoption of EPA’s Control Technique 

Guidelines (CTG) for large appliance coating and includes amendments to Regulation .06 under 

COMAR 26.11.19 – Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete and is reviewing it to 

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

 If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Diane Franks, MDE