alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129806 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129806 COA: 264838 Macomb CC: 03-003566-FC BRIAN DAVID FOSSETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 26, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
Exhibit 10.16


 





May 1, 2015


 


FEE WAIVER


 


Sidoti Micro Cap Fund, LP

122 East 42nd Street, 4th Floor


New York, New York 10168


 


Ladies and Gentleman,


 


On October 2, 2014, Sidoti Capital Management,
LLC (the “Adviser”) entered into an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”)
with Sidoti Micro Cap Fund, LP (the “Partnership”) and Sidoti Micro Cap GP, LLC (the “General Partner”).
Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Partnership has agreed to pay the Adviser a management fee in the amount of
2.00% per annum of the net asset value of the Partnership, payable quarterly.


 


The Adviser hereby exercises its discretion
to waive the management fee, as set forth in the limited partnership agreement dated June 16, 2014 between the General Partner
and the limited partners of the Partnership. This waiver shall continue until the Partnership attains $10 million of unaffiliated
limited partner subscriptions, at which time the Partnership’s obligation to pay the management fee shall be restored.


 


[Signature Page Follows]






    	 



    	 



    

The undersigned have executed this
letter as of the date first written above.


 


	 	SIDOTI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Peter T. Sidoti
	 	 	Peter T. Sidoti, Manager



 






	Acknowledgement:
	SIDOTI MICRO CAP FUND, LP
	 	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Peter T. Sidoti
	 	Peter T. Sidoti




 


 


 


[Signature Page to Adviser Fee Waiver]
Exhibit 10.1 - 2015 Q1 AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN






EXHIBIT 10.1


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
AK STEEL CORPORATION
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN


(as amended and restated effective as of October 18, 2007)




Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved to AK Steel Corporation under the terms of Section 14 of the AK Steel Corporation Annual Management Incentive Plan (as amended and restated as of October 18, 2007) (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 22, 2015:


The last sentence of the first paragraph in Section 6 is changed in its entirety to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, Performance Awards may be granted with respect to the threshold goals for safety and/or quality even if the threshold goal for net income for the Performance Period is not achieved.”
    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AK Steel Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to the Plan to be executed this 20th day of February, 2015.




AK STEEL HOLDING CORPORATION
AK STEEL CORPORATION


By:/s/ David C. Horn                
David C. Horn, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, and Secretary
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING
ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Gaming
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I DeAnn Moore, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and



(2)  the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/DeAnn MooreDeAnn MooreSecretary/Treasurer

June 14, 2005
Whyteburg Limited
                                 Aeulestrasse 5

                                   P.O.Box 470
                                   Vaduz 9490
                                  Liechtenstein

Friday, April 30, 1999

EnterTech Media Group, Inc.
50 West Liberty Street, suite 880
Reno

Nevada 89501
USA

Dear Sirs:

We confirm that we will make available to you a loan on the terms and conditions
of this letter (the "Loan").

The Loan will consist of sums advanced to you from time to time.

You will repay the Loan  together  with all  interest  outstanding  on it within
fourteen days of a written demand being made. You may repay the Loan or any part
of it at any time.

The  principal  amount of the Loan  outstanding  from  time to time  will  carry
interest at the rate of 1% per calendar or part thereof and compounding  monthly
in arrears on the last day in each calendar  month with the principal  amount of
the Loan plus interest then outstanding.

You will make all  repayments  in US Dollars  to us at our  account at CIBC Wood
Gundy in Toronto,  Canada  (details of which are attached  hereto) or such other
account as we may from time to time  advise you of in  writing.  If any  payment
becomes  due on a day that is not a day on which  banks are  generally  open for
business in Toronto,  then the due date of such  payment will be extended to the
next business  day. You will make all payments  under or in respect of this Loan
without deduction,  abatement,  setoff or counterclaim and free and clear of any
withholding  or deduction  for or on account of tax,  save as may be required by
law.

Any  demand or notice  in  respect  of this  letter  and/or  the Loan will be in
writing and (without  prejudice to any other  effective means of serving it) may
be  served on you by  delivering  it to the above  address.  Any such  demand or
notice delivered by hand shall be deemed to have been received  immediately upon
delivery.  Any such  demand or notice  sent by post shall be deemed to have been
received at the opening of business on the first  working day  following the day
on which it was posted, even if returned undelivered.

<PAGE>

Time shall be of the essence in respect of your obligations  under or in respect
of this Loan but no failure by us to exercise or delay by us in  exercising  any
right or remedy  under or in respect  of this Loan shall  operate as a waiver of
it, nor shall any single,  partial or defective exercise by us of any such right
or remedy  preclude any other or further  exercise of that or any other right or
remedy.

It is agreed that English Law governs this letter and the Loan.

Yours sincerely,


For and on behalf of Whyteburg Limited

         Agreed and accepted by:

         Date:

         Name:

         As authorised by EnterTech Media Group, Inc.

         Witnessed by:

         Name:

         Address:
# C_2022138EN.01000201.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/2

---

DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

of 1 February 2022

on official holidays and judicial vacations

(2022/C 138/02)

THE COURT

Having regards to Article 24(2), (4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure,

Whereas it is necessary, in accordance with that provision, to establish the list of official holidays and to set the dates of the judicial vacations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The list of official holidays within the meaning of Article 24(4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure is established as follows:

| — | New Year’s Day, |
| --- | --- |

—

New Year’s Day,

| — | Easter Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter Monday,

| — | 1 May, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 May,

| — | 9 May, |
| --- | --- |

—

9 May,

| — | Ascension, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ascension,

| — | Whit Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Whit Monday,

| — | 23 June, |
| --- | --- |

—

23 June,

| — | 15 August, |
| --- | --- |

—

15 August,

| — | 1 November, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 November,

| — | 25 December, |
| --- | --- |

—

25 December,

| — | 26 December. |
| --- | --- |

—

26 December.

Article 2

For the period from 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2023, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 24(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2022: from Monday 19 December 2022 to Sunday 8 January 2023 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2022: from Monday 19 December 2022 to Sunday 8 January 2023 inclusive,

| — | Easter 2023: from Monday 3 April 2023 to Sunday 16 April 2023 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2023: from Monday 3 April 2023 to Sunday 16 April 2023 inclusive,

| — | Summer 2023: from Sunday 16 July 2023 to Thursday 31 August 2023 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2023: from Sunday 16 July 2023 to Thursday 31 August 2023 inclusive.

Article 3

This decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Luxembourg, 1 February 2022.

Registrar

A. CALOT ESCOBAR

President

K. LENAERTS

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00169-REB-MEH

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 13, 2010.

The Federal Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Temporarily Stay All Proceedings [filed

April 12, 2010; docket #10] is granted. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed, pending

a decision on the Federal Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Actions by the Judicial Panel on

Multidistrict Litigation. The parties shall file a status report within five business days upon receipt

of the Judicial Panel’s decision. 

The Scheduling Conference set for April 22, 2010, is vacated.
42095.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. EVANS.

Hall, Judge.

The State Highway Department, as condemnor, appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict establishing an award of compensation for property of condemnee taken pursuant to Ga. L. 1961, p. 517, as amended *(Code Ann.*§ 36-1301 et seq.).

1. The trial court did not err in permitting certain cross examination of the condemnor’s witness by the condemnee, when thereafter the court sustained the objection to the questioning and ruled out any response thereto and instructed the jury to disregard it, and the condemnor made no further objection, motion, or request-for instruction. *Ivy v. State,*220 Ga. 699, 703 (141 SE2d 541); *Livingston v. State,*17 Ga. App. 136, 140 (86 SE 449); *Humphries v. Miller,*66 Ga. App. 871, 873 (19 SE2d 321); *State Hwy. Dept. v. Edmunds,*113 Ga. App. 550 (149 SE2d 182). Accord *Kendrick v. Kendrick,*218 Ga. 460, 462 (128 SE2d 496); *State Hwy. Dept. v. Knox,*113 Ga. App. 607 (149 SE2d 188).

2. Several enumerations of error complain of testimony and evidence of sales of other properties as not shown to be comparable to the condemnee’s property. The sales in question were of properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the condemnee’s property, and witnesses testified as to their similarities to- and differences from the condemnee’s property in size, location, characteristics, value and the time of sale. The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of these sales. *West v. Fulton County,*95 Ga. App. 320, 321 (97 SE2d 785); *Georgia Power Co. v. Walker,*101 Ga. App. 454, 457 (114 SE2d 159, 80 ALR2d 1264); *Fulton County v. Power,*109 Ga. App. 783, 784 (137 SE2d 474); *Schrimsher v. State Hwy. Dept.,*110 Ga. App. 705, 707 (140 SE2d 64); *State Hwy. Dept. v. Rutland,*112 Ga. App. 792, 794 (146 SE2d 544).

3. The trial court did not err in overruling the condemnor’s motion to exclude the testimony of a witness with reference to the value of the land taken, on the ground that the witness’ testimony on cross examination impeached his testimony as to value given on direct examination. *Southern R. Co. v. Richardson,*48 Ga. App. 25, 30 (172 SE 79); *State Hwy. Dept. v. Wells,*102 Ga. App. 152, 154 (115 SE2d 585); accord *Williams v. Colonial Pipeline Co.,*110 Ga. App. 824, 826 (140 SE2d 150).

*39Argued June 8, 1966

Decided June 23, 1966

Rehearing denied July 6, 1966.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, 'Richard L. Chambers, James H. Wood, Assistant Attorneys General, D. Field Yow, L. Clifford Adams, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, Lon L-Fleming,*for appellant.

*Kenneth Goolsby, Randall Evans, Jr.,*for appellee.

4. The condemnor made a motion to exclude the testimony of Monroe Kimbrel, presented by deposition taken before the trial, on the ground that the witness’ opinion of the value of the condemnee’s property did not relate to the date of the taking. The trial court did not err in admitting the evidence. *State Hwy. Dept. v. Knox,*113 Ga. App. 607, supra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat  Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat  Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Treaty Room

Washington, D.C.

November 1, 2023

 

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Good morning.  It’s a great pleasure to welcome Chairperson Faki here to the State Department, to Washington, for what is now our ninth High-Level Dialogue between the African Union and the United States.  I think this reflects the vital and increasingly close partnership between the United States and the AU, and it also reflects the critical role that the AU plays not only regionally but around the world that was further reflected in the fact that the AU was welcomed into the G20 just this year.

We are partners in working to strengthen democratic institutions to provide for regional security to deal with the most important challenges that our people face, whether it’s dealing with climate change, food insecurity, infrastructure, global health.  In each of these areas and more, the African Union and the United States are partners.  The relationship between the United States and the African Union is maybe the best example of our commitment and our conviction that, when it comes to Africa, it’s not what we’re doing for Africa; it’s what we’re doing with Africa and in support of Africa.

So it’s a great pleasure, my friend, to welcome you here to the State Department.

**CHAIRPERSON FAKI:**Thank you.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Thank you for being here.

**CHAIRPERSON FAKI:**(Via interpreter) Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary of State.  It is a pleasure to be here in Washington for the ninth High-Level Dialogue that we have with the United States.  In fact, it coincides with the tenth anniversary of the agreement that we have had since we have started this dialogue.

In fact, since we have launched this dialogue (inaudible) High-Level Dialogue between the United States and Africa, the priorities of our partnership (inaudible) yourself described it – peace and security, democracy, development, climate change.  And this partnership is very fruitful, we want to expand it, and even deepen this partnership.

In fact, we’ve (inaudible) stop of what we have been doing on the occasion of this tenth anniversary and stress that there is a possibility of our expanding the partnership and (inaudible) into a high level and also deal with the issues that you have already mentioned, and also the partnership that the continent has with the United States.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Thank you.  Thank you.

Tags

African UnionBureau of African AffairsDemocracyGlobal HealthGlobal SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsPeaceThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated this ____ day of
March 1999, effective as of March 1, 1999, by and between KONOVER PROPERTY
TRUST, INC. (formerly FAC Realty Trust, Inc.) (the "Company") and WILLIAM H.
NEVILLE (the "Executive").

                                    RECITALS

        A. The Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment
Agreement with an Effective Date of September 8, 1997 (the "Agreement").

        B. The Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows.

                                    AGREEMENT

        1. All capitalized terms shall be deemed to have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Agreement.

        2. Section 2(e)(ii) and Section 2(e)(iii) of the Agreement shall be
amended by deleting, in each section "twenty percent (20%)" and substituting
fifty percent (50%) in its place and stead.

        3. Except as otherwise noted herein, all other provisions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified and affirmed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hand and seal as of the
effective date hereof.

                                       KONOVER PROPERTY TRUST, INC.


                                       By:   /c/ C. Cammack Morton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           C. Cammack Morton
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



                                               /s/ William H. Neville     (SEAL)
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       WILLIAM H. NEVILLE
June 2, 2016

Mr. Carlos Gomez Vice President, Director of Maintenance Florida Air Transport Inc.

5820 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014

Dear Mr. Gomez:

We have received your May 23, 2016, correspondence withdrawing your February 2, 2016, petition on behalf of Florida Air Transport Inc. for an exemption from §§ 125.265 and 91.529 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2016-3412). No further action will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Katie Haley Acting Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division Office of Rulemaking
# C_2023166EN.01000601.xml

| 11.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/6

---

Notice of cancellation of open competition EPSO/AST/154/22 – Assistants (AST 3) in the following fields: 1. Financial management 2. Accounting and treasury 3. Public procurement 4. Graphic design and visual content production 5. Social and digital media 6. Webmaster

(2023/C 166/06)

Open competition EPSO/AST/154/22 for which the notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (1) is cancelled.

The decision to cancel the competition has been taken by EPSO’s Director as the Appointing Authority, in agreement with EPSO’s governing body, the interinstitutional Management Board. The decision to cancel the competition was reached after a careful analysis, taking into consideration a number of accumulated difficulties surrounding the first phase of selection, in particular as regards the implementation of remotely proctored tests, including technical dysfunctions and data protection concerns. These difficulties compromised the expected overall standard of quality and the principle of equal treatment applicable to all candidates participating in the competition. It is therefore in the interest of the service not to continue the selection under competition EPSO/AST/154/22.

---

(1)  OJ C 363 A, 22.9.2022, p. 1.

---
§ 150.330 Are there investments in which I may not invest funds of a fiduciary account? You may not invest funds of a fiduciary account for which you have investment discretion in the following assets, unless authorized by applicable law: ( a ) The stock or obligations of, or assets acquired from, you or any of your directors, officers, or employees.
( b ) The stock or obligations of, or assets acquired from, your affiliates or any of their directors, officers, or employees.
( c ) The stock or obligations of, or assets acquired from, other individuals or organizations if you have an interest in the individual or organization that might affect the exercise of your best judgment.
# Official Journal L 40/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.040.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 40 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5412 February 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.040.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 40

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5412 February 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/84/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9667) | 1 |
| | | 2011/85/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9676) | 206 |
| | | 2011/86/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the Pannonian biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9677) | 300 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2011/84/EU

*

Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9667)

(notified under document C(2010) 9667)

1

2011/85/EU

*

Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9676)

(notified under document C(2010) 9676)

206

2011/86/EU

*

Commission Decision of 10 January 2011 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the Pannonian biogeographical region
  (notified under document C(2010) 9677)

(notified under document C(2010) 9677)

300

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.