alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON
                    FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Lamar Advertising Company:

The audits referred to in our reports dated February 2, 2001, included the
related financial statement schedules of (a) Lamar Advertising Company and
subsidiaries, and (b) Lamar Media Corp. and subsidiaries for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statement
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our
audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules of (a) Lamar
Advertising Company and subsidiaries, and (b) Lamar Media Corp. and
subsidiaries, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Lamar
Advertising Company on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-10337, 333-79571, 333-37858 and
333-34840), the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-52851, 333-66059,
333-71929, 333-48288 and 333-45490), and the Registration Statements on Form S-4
(No. 333-48266) of our reports dated February 2, 2001, relating to (a) the
consolidated balance sheets of Lamar Advertising Company and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and (b) the
consolidated balance sheets of Lamar Media Corp. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Lamar Advertising Company.

Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for costs of start-up
activities.

                                                              KPMG LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 22, 2001
#### § 1073.304 Failure to timely submit request for a hearing.

If the Bureau does not receive an employee's request for hearing within the 15-day period set forth in § 1073.303, the employee shall not be entitled to a hearing, and salary offset may be initiated. However, the Bureau may accept an untimely request for hearing if the employee can show that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice of the time limit (unless otherwise aware of it).
# C_2023255EN.01000701.xml

| 20.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2023/C 255/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EUIPO/AD/01/23 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of intellectual property

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union
  C 254 A of 20 July 2023
  .

Further information can be found on the EPSO website (1).

---

(1)  https://epso.europa.eu/en

---
# Official Journal L 240/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 240 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6019 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 240

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6019 September 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/1539 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 laying down the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25) to less significant supervised entities which are subject to national accounting frameworks
  (ECB/2017/26) | 212 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25)

(ECB/2017/25)

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/1539 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 laying down the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25) to less significant supervised entities which are subject to national accounting frameworks
  (ECB/2017/26)

(ECB/2017/26)

212

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Samoa Independence Day

# 									Samoa Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 31, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I would like to congratulate all Samoans on the 60th anniversary of your independence on June 1.

The close friendship between Samoa and the United States is rooted in our strong historical, cultural, economic, and people-to-people ties.

Our longstanding partnership in building an open, connected, prosperous, resilient, and secure Indo-Pacific has enabled us to tackle numerous challenges, including responding to the global pandemic.  Together, we will advance our shared climate goals and expand bilateral trade and investment.  I look forward to deepening our comprehensive relationship with Samoa in the coming year.

Once again, I send my warmest congratulations to the people of Samoa on this special day.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSamoaThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Public Comment Form 

Mystic Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest

PACTOLA PROJECT AREA 

Draft EIS Comments 

NAME: _________________________________________ 

ADDRESS: ______________________________________ 

 ______________________________________ 

 ______________________________________ 

( ) I have no comments, please keep me informed. 

( ) Please remove me from your Pactola Project Area mailing list. 

( ) I have the following comments about the Pactola Project Area: 

 

 

 

Return to: Robert Thompson, District Ranger, Mystic Ranger District, Pactola Project Area, 8221 S 

Hwy 16, Rapid City, SD 57702 (Or fold, seal, and add a stamp to the back of the sheet). 
........................................................................................................................................................... 

............................................................................................................................................. 

place 

stamp 

 ____________________________ here 

______________________________ 

______________________________ 

 Robert Thompson, District Ranger 

 Mystic Ranger District 

 Pactola Project Area 

 8221 South Highway 16 

 Rapid City SD 57702
HomeReportsBureau of CounterterrorismCountry Reports on Terrorism 2019…Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

# 					Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea			

 In this section										

                -  Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 

## Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

On November 20, 2017, the Secretary of State designated the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.  The Secretary determined that the DPRK government repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, as the DPRK was implicated in assassinations on foreign soil.

The DPRK was previously designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism in 1988 primarily because of its involvement in the bombing of a Korean Airlines passenger flight in 1987.  The DPRK’s designation was rescinded in 2008 after a thorough review found the DPRK met the statutory requirements for rescission.  In 2017, the Secretary of State determined the DPRK had repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism since its State Sponsor of Terrorism designation was rescinded in 2008.  The DPRK has also failed to take action to address historical support for acts of international terrorism.  Four Japanese Red Army members wanted by the Japanese government for participating in a 1970 Japan Airlines hijacking continue to shelter in the DPRK.  The Japanese government also continues to seek a full accounting of the fate of a number of Japanese nationals believed to have been abducted by DPRK state entities in the 1970s and 1980s; only five such abductees have been repatriated to Japan since 2002.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCountering TerrorismCountering Violent ExtremismCounterterrorismNorth KoreaTerrorism

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2710

To ensure that a flag is furnished to drape the casket of each public safety 

officer killed in the line of duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2003

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To ensure that a flag is furnished to drape the casket of 

each public safety officer killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Safety Officers 

5 Flag Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLAG FURNISHED FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS 

7 KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu9 rity shall furnish a flag to drape the casket of each public 

10 safety officer killed in the line of duty. 
2

•HR 2710 IH 

1 (b) FURNISHING AFTER BURIAL.—After the burial 

2 of such a public safety officer, the flag so furnished shall 

3 be given to the officer’s next of kin. If no claim is made 

4 for the flag by the next of kin, it may be given, upon re5 quest, to a close friend or associate of the deceased officer. 

6 If a flag is given to a close friend or associate of the de7 ceased officer, no flag shall be given to any other person 

8 on account of the death of such officer. 

9 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘public 

10 safety officer’’ means an individual serving a public agency 

11 in an official capacity, with or without compensation, as 

12 a law enforcement officer, as a firefighter, or as a member 

13 of a rescue squad or ambulance crew.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,064
<INVENTORY>                                        407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,992
<PP&E>                                          11,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         73
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,411
<SALES>                                          3,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,006
<CGS>                                              516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    369
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       272
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
§ 151.140 What policies and procedures must I maintain and follow for securities transactions? If you effect securities transactions for customers, you must maintain and follow policies and procedures that meet all of the following requirements: ( a ) Your policies and procedures must assign responsibility for the supervision of all officers or employees who: ( 1 ) Transmit orders to, or place orders with, registered broker-dealers;
( 2 ) Execute transactions in securities for customers; or
( 3 ) Process orders for notice or settlement purposes, or perform other back office functions for securities transactions that you effect for customers. Policies and procedures for personnel described in this paragraph (a)(3) must provide supervision and reporting lines that are separate from supervision and reporting lines for personnel described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
( b ) Your policies and procedures must provide for the fair and equitable allocation of securities and prices to accounts when you receive orders for the same security at approximately the same time and you place the orders for execution either individually or in combination.
( c ) Your policies and procedures must provide for securities transactions in which you act as agent for the buyer and seller (crossing of buy and sell orders) on a fair and equitable basis to the parties to the transaction, where permissible under applicable law.
( d ) Your policies and procedures must require your officers and employees to file the personal securities trading reports described at § 151.150, if the officer or employee: ( 1 ) Makes investment recommendations or decisions for the accounts of customers;
( 2 ) Participates in the determination of these recommendations or decisions; or
( 3 ) In connection with their duties, obtains information concerning which securities you intend to purchase, sell, or recommend for purchase or sale.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          72,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        1,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,803
<PP&E>                                          31,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          844,186 
<BONDS>                                      1,500,000
<COMMON>                                       142,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          478,508
<PREFERRED>                                      1,875
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,693,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,228
<SALES>                                          18,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,195
<CGS>                                            13,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (100,041)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (324,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (324,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (324,943)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7270

CLARENCE JAY LYNCH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE M. MCMILLAN, Sheriff, Roanoke City,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-230-7)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: January 9, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Emmette Pilgreen, IV, Harvey Sidney Lutins, LUTINS & PILGREEN,

P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Jay Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Lynch has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE
                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


     In  conjunction  with the annual  report of Sharps  Compliance  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Burton J.
Kunik,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman  of the  Board of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that

     (1)  The Form  10-KSB/A  report for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
          filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on September 14,
          2005,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 10-KSB/A  report for the years
          ended  June  30,  2005  and  2004  fairly  presents,  in all  material
          respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Sharps
          Compliance Corp.



      By:  /s/ BURTON J. KUNIK


      Burton J. Kunik
      Chairman of the Board of Directors
      Chief Executive Officer

      Date: October 31, 2005


                                      F-22
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RBD INVESTMENT TRUST, MS INVESTMENT TRUST, RON DAVIS, AND MIKE WOLFINGTON

Appellant s ,

v. Case No. 5D22- 2351 LT Case No. 2017- CA -55151 BABCOCK COQUINA MINE, LLC, AND JEFFERY W. WELLS

Appellee s. ________________________________/ Decision filed August 1, 20 23 Appeal from Circuit Court f or Brevard County, George Paulk, Judge. Thomas C. Allison, of Thomas C. Allison, P.A. , Winter Park, and Robin F. Hazel, of Hazel Law P.A., Hollywood, for Appellants. Howard Poznanski, Coconut Creek , f or Appellees. PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. MAKAR, JAY and SOUD, JJ., concur.
F i s h 

C r e e k 

T i n g m

i a

k s i q v i k R i v e r 

K i

k i a k r o r a k 

R i v e r 

K o g o s u k r u k 

R i v e r 

Ju d y

Cr e e k 

Migu akiak R. 

C o l v i l l e 

Ikpikp

uk 

River 

R

i

v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

H a r r i s o n 

B

a y 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

1 E 

9 

2 

8 

4 

6 

9 N 

Pitt Point 

A R C T I C O C E A N

Cape Simpson 

Sm ith Bay 

15 N

4 3 2 1 W 12 11 10 8 7 6 5

T e s h e k p u k L a k e Kogru R. 14

13

12

10

2 3 4 5

1 W 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

5

3

2

1 N 

2 3 4 5

1 W 1 E 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

1 S 

2

3

RINGED SEAL 

4

Ringed Seal Sighting 

5

0 6 12

Miles

Source: USDOI MMS and Naval Ocean Systems Center 2002

Map 3-27. Ringed Seal Sightings Offshore of the Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

(1979 - 1999) 

11 

7