alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 42.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-509, 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (October 21, 1986), to be codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. Section 3809 of title 31 U.S.C., requires each authority head, such as the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part: ( 1 ) Establishes and provides the only administrative procedures and actions for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents, and
( 2 ) Specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
DECISION NOTICE

Appendix B. Decision Notice, July 1985

The Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Study was conducted pursuant to 

the National Trails System Act, Public Law 90-543, as amended. An environmental 

assessment and study plan that recommend federal legislation to designate the 1,170-

mile Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) Trail as a national historic trail and a component of the 

National Trails System were distributed to 431 individuals, groups, federal and state 

agencies, and elected officials. 

Based on the analysis and evaluation described in the original environmental 

assessment and subsequent public review and response, it is my decision to adopt the 

joint Forest Service/National Park Service preferred Alternative C-1. This alternative 

best protects a historically significant event, provides additional opportunities for low 

impact recreation, and responds to public demands. Alternative C-1 designates the 

entire 1,170-mile route as a national historic trail. It includes marking, for identification 

and interpretation, along highways and other connecting roads. It also includes 

development of certain important segments identified in the study as "high potential 

route segments." 

While Alternative A, the no-Federal-action alternative, is considered to be the 

environmentally preferable, it is not responsive to the basic criteria set forth in the 

National Trails System Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-543), as amended by Public Law 95-625, 

November 10, 1978, Section 5(b), (11) (A), (B), and (C). Alternative A is also not 

responsive to additional issues developed through public participation. During the 45-

day review period, public response indicated that Alternative D -- the most extensive 

development alternative considered -- was felt to require more funding, construction 

and use of private land than is currently necessary to meet the objectives. 

I have determined, through the environmental analysis, that the proposed action would 

not significantly affect the quality of the human environment; therefore, an 

environmental impact statement is not needed. This determination was made 

considering the following factors: (a) Marking along highways and trail construction and 

reconstruction along selected route segments will have only a slight effect on the 

ecosystem, (b) condemnation procedures to acquire private land easements will not be 

used by administering agencies, (c) the adverse effects on certain threatened and 

endangered species in Yellowstone National Park and the Shoshone National Forest are 

considered to be minimal, and (d) the physical and biological effects are limited to the 

area of planned development and use. 

Implementation of this project proposal is contingent upon Congressional approval. 

/s/ Peter C. Myers 

JULY 1, 1985 
Peter C. Myers 

Asst. Secretary of Agriculture
§ 42.35 The record. ( a ) The hearing will be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the ALJ at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication.
( b ) The transcription of testimony, exhibits and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the ALJ and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
( c ) The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by anyone, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 42.24 of this part.
§ 40.10 Making efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns. ( a ) If a State process provides a State process recommendation to VA through its single point of contact, the Secretary either: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation;
( 2 ) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the State process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with such written explanation of the decision, as the Secretary in his or her discretion deems appropriate. The Secretary may also supplement the written explanation by providing the explanation to the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Secretary informs the single point of contact that: ( 1 ) The VA will not implement its decision for at least ten days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) The Secretary has reviewed the decision and determined that, because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification five days after the date of mailing of such notification.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0664]


Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Cancellation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee 
scheduled for October 6, 2009, is cancelled. This meeting was announced 
in the Federal Register of August 25, 2009 (74 FR 42907). The October 
6, 2009, Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting was to discuss 
ApoPharma, Inc.'s new drug application (NDA) 021-825 for proposed trade 
name FERRIPROX (deferiprone) film-coated tablets. This meeting has been 
cancelled to allow time for FDA to review and resolve several 
outstanding issues. The agency intends to continue evaluating NDA 021-
825 and, as needed, may schedule an advisory committee meeting in the 
future.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Vesely, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane (for express delivery, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1093), 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-6793, FAX: 301-827-6776, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f09e99939f9c95de869583959c89b0969491de989883de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="533d3a303c3f367d253620363f2a133537327d3b3b207d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 
1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 
3014512542. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information 
on this meeting.

    Dated: September 28, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23764 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

As of June 14, 2000, I have been engaged as a consultant with
Electronic Identification, Inc. (the "Company"). In that role I
have advised and will continue to advise the Company concerning
bona-fide business matters as generally described below. I will
receive, as part of my compensation for these services, common
stock of the Company in an amount to be determined. I hereby
acknowledge the following representations to the Company.

I certify that I have not, and do not intend to, consult with or
advise the Company, as part of this Agreement, in connection with
the offer or sale of its securities in a capital-raising
transaction, and have not and will not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for the Company's securities. I
enter into this agreement as a natural person on my own behalf,
not on behalf of any corporation, partnership, or other entity.

Signed this 20th day of June, 2000,




/s/ Stuart Brazier
Signature


Stuart Brazier
Print Name

General Services to be provided:
   Sales and Marketing
   strategic planning
   consulting
#### §§ 1022.124-1022.129 [Reserved]
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 030 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. CORENA MARIE MOUNTAIN CHIEF ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 7 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including March 26 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 10 2023

03/10/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0030
§ 1209.53 Recommended decision and filing of record. ( a ) *Filing of recommended decision and record.* Within 45 days after expiration of the time allowed for filing reply briefs under § 1209.52(b), the presiding officer shall file with and certify to the Director, for decision, the record of the proceeding. The record must include the presiding officer's recommended decision, recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, and proposed order; all pre-hearing and hearing transcripts, exhibits and rulings; and the motions, briefs, memoranda, and other supporting papers filed in connection with the hearing. The presiding officer shall serve upon each party the recommended decision, recommended findings and conclusions, and proposed order.
( b ) *Filing of index.* At the same time the presiding officer files with and certifies to the Director, for final determination, the record of the proceeding, the presiding officer shall furnish to the Director a certified index of the entire record of the proceeding. The certified index shall include, at a minimum, an entry for each paper, document or motion filed with the presiding officer in the proceeding, the date of the filing, and the identity of the filer. The certified index shall also include an exhibit index containing, at a minimum, an entry consisting of exhibit number and title or description for: each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing; and each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing.
# C_2022003EN.01000101.xml

| 4.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 January 2022

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 January 2022

(2022/C 3/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1355 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2958 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0372 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0013 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,818 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 367,71 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5895 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9483 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,0777 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5691 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4420 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8541 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6651 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5333 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 354,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9661 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2174 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5190 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 202,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7379 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,051 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 84,5313 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,665 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3539 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2259 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,3949 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1355

JPY

Japanese yen

130,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84135

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2958

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0372

ISK

Iceland króna

147,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0013

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,818

HUF

Hungarian forint

367,71

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5895

RON

Romanian leu

4,9483

TRY

Turkish lira

15,0777

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5691

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4420

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8541

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6651

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5333

KRW

South Korean won

1 354,40

ZAR

South African rand

17,9661

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2174

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5190

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 202,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7379

PHP

Philippine peso

58,051

RUB

Russian rouble

84,5313

THB

Thai baht

37,665

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3539

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2259

INR

Indian rupee

84,3949

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1237.8 Alternate procedures for determination of claims.

Claimants seeking a review of the determination of claims may seek alternative dispute resolution from the Agency as receiver in lieu of a judicial determination. The Director may by order, policy statement, or directive establish alternative dispute resolution procedures for this purpose.
# C_2021528EN.01003601.xml

| 30.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 528/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 528/36

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 December 2021

(2021/C 528/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1303 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2608 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0380 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9883 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,958 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 370,22 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6037 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 14,1525 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5638 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4486 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8127 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6625 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5309 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9471 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1994 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 112,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7269 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,592 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,5863 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,888 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3824 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2544 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,3880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1303

JPY

Japanese yen

129,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84115

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2608

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0380

ISK

Iceland króna

147,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9883

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,958

HUF

Hungarian forint

370,22

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6037

RON

Romanian leu

4,9499

TRY

Turkish lira

14,1525

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5638

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4486

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8127

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6625

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5309

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,06

ZAR

South African rand

17,9471

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1994

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 112,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7269

PHP

Philippine peso

57,592

RUB

Russian rouble

83,5863

THB

Thai baht

37,888

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3824

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2544

INR

Indian rupee

84,3880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# Official Journal C 207/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.207.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 522 September 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.207.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 522 September 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 207/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 2 September 2009 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 207/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 2 September 2009 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 207/02 | State aid — Kingdom of Denmark — State aid C 19/09 (ex N 64/09) — Restructuring aid to TV2 Danmark A/S — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2009/C 207/02

State aid — Kingdom of Denmark — State aid C 19/09 (ex N 64/09) — Restructuring aid to TV2 Danmark A/S — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Saudi Arabia

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Saudi Arabia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia

During the review period, the government made its enacted budget and end-of-year report publicly available online within a reasonable period, but it did not publish its executive budget proposal at least one month before the start of the fiscal year.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available online.  The limited data available in the government’s annual budget statement broke down expenditures by category, but not by ministry or agency.  Some major state-owned enterprises did not have publicly available audited financial statements.  The annual budget statement did not show allocations to the royal family and the government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to public oversight.  Deviations from planned expenditures and revenues were disclosed.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and followed up on its findings, but its reports were not publicly available.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not consistently made publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework and disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Saudi Arabia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing the executive budget proposal within a reasonable period;
- Publishing expenditures by ministry or agency in the budget;
- Ensuring audit reports for major state-owned enterprises are publicly available;
- Making audit reports of the government’s executed budget widely and easily accessible to the public within a reasonable period; and
- Making basic information on natural resource awards consistently available to the public.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSaudi Arabia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Dialogic Corporation
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-08183,  No. 333-11373, and No. 333-26993 of Dialogic Corporation of Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-11369 and Amendment No. 1 to Registration No.
333-11369 of Dialogic  Corporation  on Form S-3 of our report dated February 10,
1998  (except  for Notes 7 and 9, as to which the date is  February  18,  1998),
incorporated  by  reference  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Dialogic
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997.


Parsippany, New Jersey                       DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 27, 1998
Exhibit 10.2


 



Second Amendment to Compensation Matters Agreement of Lori Lipcaman







This second amendment to Compensation Matters Agreement (the "Second Amendment"), made as of March 3, 2015 by and between Vishay Europe GmbH, a German company ("Vishay Europe") and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay"), and LORI LIPCAMAN ("Executive") (collectively the "Parties").







WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Vishay Europe and is a Party to that certain Compensation Matters Agreement made between the Parties as of August 23, 2011, as amended by the first amendment to the Compensation Matters Agreement made between the parties as of March 4, 2014 (collectively, the "Compensation Matters Agreement");







WHEREAS, Vishay Europe and Executive may amend the Compensation Matters Agreement by mutual agreement in writing; and







 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Compensation Matters Agreement as set forth in this Second Amendment.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:







1.Paragraph two of the Compensation Matters Agreement is hereby amended by replacing "2012" and "25%" in the third sentence with "2015" and "40%", respectively.







2.The amendments to the Compensation Matters Agreement made by paragraph 1 of this Second Amendment shall be effective as of March 3, 2015.







3.Except as set forth in this Second Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Compensation Matters Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







4.This Second Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Second Amendment to be executed on its behalf as of the date first above written.







VISHAY EUROPE GMBH












By: /s/ Werner Gebhardt


Name: Werner Gebhardt


Title: Managing Director







Date: April 28, 2015







[Executive's signature on next page]


 













 




/s/ Lori Lipcaman


Lori Lipcaman


 


 


Date: April 23, 2015