alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U n ited S tates C o u rt o f A p p ea ls Fo r th e Se ve n th C irc u it Ch i cago , I l l i noi s 6 0604 A ugust 5 , 20 09 Befo re R IC H A R D D . C U D A H Y , Cir cu i tJudg e K E N N E T H F. R IP P L E , Cir cu i tJudg e D IA N E P . W O O D , Cir cu i tJudg e
N o. 08
- 3287 UNI T E D S T AT E S O F AME R I C A,

P lain tiff-A p p elle e,

v . J E F F E R Y D E AN,

Defe nd ant- A pp el l ant. A pp ealfro m the U ni ted S tat es D istri ct C ou rt forthe Sou th ern Di st r i cto fI ndi an a, New A lba ny Divi si on N o. 4: 06- cr- 0023
- SEB-M GN
- 14 Sara h Evans Bar ker, J udg e .

O RD E R I t i s o rder ed that the fol l owing cor re cti ons be m ade i n the opi ni on o fthe cour t date d J uly31 , 20 09: S l i p o pi ni o n pa g e 5 a nd 6 , f o o t no t e 3

— F o o tno t e 3 i s o mi t t e d;

S l i p o pi ni o n pa g e 6 , f o o t no t e 5

— F o o t no t e 5 i s o mi t t e d.
I ti s s o o r de r e d.
#### § 145.101 Fiscal agency.

A Federal savings association designated fiscal agent by the Secretary of the Treasury or with OCC approval by another instrumentality of the United States, shall, as such, perform such reasonable duties and exercise only such powers and privileges as the Secretary of the Treasury or such instrumentality may prescribe.
#### §§ 1010.24-1010.28 [Reserved]
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Malawi

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Malawi			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Malawi 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Malawi

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal and end-of-year reports publicly available online within a reasonable period.  However, the enacted budget was not published within a reasonable period.  While information on most debt obligations was publicly available, information on state-owned enterprise debt was not accessible.  Publicly available budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, including natural resource revenues.  The information in the budget was generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and its audit of the government’s annual financial accounts was published within a reasonable period.  The government specified in law but did not appear to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Malawi’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Ensuring the enacted budget is published within a reasonable period;
- Disclosing all state-owned enterprise debt; and
- Ensuring procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts are followed in practice.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Malawi 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMalawi

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
## GEE Productions UAS **PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST**

Environmental: □ Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity. □ Nofy any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intenons. □ If flying in controlled airspace, nofy airspace authority of yo ur intentions. □ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area Equipment: □ Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints) □ Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / es □ Loose or damaged wiring □ Loose or damaged connecons (solder, plugs, etc) □ Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened construcon □ Ba ery/ba eries fully charged, properly seated & secured □ Remove props an d test fail - safe behavior (if applicable) □ Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub) □ Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over ghten which may damage prop) □ Ensure voltage alarm is connected □ Ensure arming/idle meout is properly configured (6 - 15 seconds is generally acceptable) □ Check whether the right model is selected in the transmi er (if applicable) □ Check your RC transmi er shows the right range and centering for all scks □ If desired, perform range test Pre Flight: □ Secure Locaon □ Set up boundaries with cones/markers □ Safety meeting with all crew and production personnel □ Have all none essenal producon personnel leave landing/take offzones □ Ba eries charged & secured □ Posion UAS in a level, safe location for takeoff □ If using onbo ard video recorder, turn on camera □ All transmi er controls move freely in all direcons, Trims neutral, switches typically away □ Transmi er thro le to zero □ Radio transmi er on □ Connect/power on battery to airframe □ Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct □ Scan for nearby people, animals or obstrucons again □ Stand clear - audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR” □ Arm flight controller □ Increase thro le slight ly listening for any abnormalities □ Short 20- 30 second hover at 3 - 5 feet (listen for any vibrations or anything that sounds abnormal) Imposed Restrictions:

- We change props every 100hrs or any sign of wear

- We rebuild the UAV every 200hrs - checkin g wires, welds, connections, etc

- We do not fly within 10’ of any obstacles

- We do not fly over an y persons or moving objects

- We fly only line of sight with a maximum distance & h e ight of 300’

- All personnel have to stand behind the UAV operator at no less than 25’ distance

- We go th rough our safety/ preflight checklist and have safety meeting with production personnel

- We do a quick takeoff and landing checking all systems before we begin shooting

- Inflight we monitor the system with our OSD te lemetry

- We land the UAV at no less than 22.5volts loaded (we use 6S batteries so this is 3.8 volts per cell loaded which relates to 2 0% life left in batteries loaded or 30% none loaded (we only fly with dual/parallel batteries for redundancy).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1881421
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4670000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    3943816
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3821624
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3869466
<LOANS>                                       58928939
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (267000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                76470253
<DEPOSITS>                                    59120090
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1000000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1807953
<LONG-TERM>                                    8118734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2649
<OTHER-SE>                                     6420827
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                76470253
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4538145
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               809146
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5347291
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2413807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3006786
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2340505
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    65023
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2073046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 570471
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      570471
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    362471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.37
<LOANS-NON>                                     262000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                276300
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    74323
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               267000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            267000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EX-32                                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                         SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Turf
Corporation of America ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003               /s/  Gary Borglund
                                       Gary Borglund
                                       President/Secretary/Treasurer
# Official Journal L 235/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6322 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 235

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6322 July 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1079 of 20 July 2020 on the verification and correction of data referred to in Regulation (EU) 2018/956 on the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1079 of 20 July 2020 on the verification and correction of data referred to in Regulation (EU) 2018/956 on the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (
  1
  )

2

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Quenisha Gardner, Appellant

No. 06-13-00018-CR v.

State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court of 

Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 003-

0149-09). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Quenisha Gardner, has adequately indicated her inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 2, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Revocation of Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations Designations and the Delisting of Six Deceased Individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists

# 									Revocation of Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations Designations and the Delisting of Six Deceased Individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 20, 2022

Today, the Department of State is announcing the revocation of five Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designations under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): Basque Fatherland and Liberty, Aum Shinrikyo, Mujahidin Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem, Kahane Chai, and Gama’a al-Islamiyya.  All five organizations will remain designated as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGT) entities under Executive Order 13224.  The Department is retaining these SDGT designations for a number of reasons, including to support law enforcement actions or ensure frozen assets are not released to still active individual terrorists.

In addition to these five FTO revocations, the Department of State is also announcing the revocation of six now deceased individuals as SDGTs designated under Executive Order 13224: Abu al-Wardah, Mohad Moalim, Farah Mohamed Shirdon, Musa Abu Dawud, Aliaskhab Kebekov, and Ibrahim al-Rubaysh.

As required by the INA, the Department reviews FTO designations every five years to determine if the circumstances that were the basis of the designation have changed in such a manner as to warrant a revocation.  Our review of these five FTO designations determined that, as defined by the INA, the five organizations are no longer engaged in terrorism or terrorist activity and do not retain the capability and intent to do so.  Therefore, as required by the INA, these FTO designations are being revoked.

These actions are intended to reflect the United States’ resolve to comply with legal requirements to review and revoke FTO designations when the facts compel such action.  These revocations do not seek to overlook or excuse the terrorist acts each of these groups previously engaged in or the harm the organizations caused its victims, but rather recognize the success Egypt, Israel, Japan, and Spain have had in defusing the threat of terrorism by these groups.  Revoking FTO designations and the delisting of deceased individuals ensures our terrorism sanctions remain current and credible and does not reflect any change in policy towards the past activities of any of these terrorists or of the organizations in which they were members.

The United States remains committed to combating the activities of terrorists worldwide.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonTerrorist Designation

Back to Top
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Pakistan

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Pakistan			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Pakistan 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Pakistan

During the review period, the government made its enacted budget and end-of-year report widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.It did not publish its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period.Only limited information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available.Publicly available budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of most of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue, including natural resource revenues.The military and intelligence budgets were not subject to adequate parliamentary or civilian public oversight.The information in the budget was considered generally reliable and subject to audit by the supreme audit institution.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence.Its audit reports were made publicly available within a reasonable period and provided substantive findings.The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Pakistan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Making its executive budget proposal publicly available within a reasonable period;
-  Disclosing detailed information on government debt obligations, including for state-owned enterprises; and
-  Subjecting the military and intelligence agencies’ budgets to parliamentary or civilian public oversight.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Pakistan 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentPakistan

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         210,049                 210,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  214,428                 214,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,736                  40,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               401,124                 401,124
<PP&E>                                         245,027                 245,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,555                 217,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 500,264                 500,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          972,715                 972,715
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                       108,441                 108,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (580,892)               (580,892)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   500,264                 500,264
<SALES>                                        306,323                 625,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,323                 625,407
<CGS>                                          240,684                 451,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,684                 451,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,604                 357,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,273                  17,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (121,238)               (200,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (121,238)               (200,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (121,238)               (200,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                   (.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021513EN.01000302.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/3

---

Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges

(2021/C 513/07)

At a meeting on 11 October 2021, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to Article 12(2) of the Rules of Procedure, Ms Ziemele as President of the Sixth Chamber, Mr Passer as President of the Seventh Chamber, Mr Jääskinen as President of the Eighth Chamber, Mr Rodin as President of the Ninth Chamber and Mr Jarukaitis as President of the Tenth Chamber for the period from 11 October 2021 to 6 October 2022.

---
# C_2022484EN.01002801.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/28

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/10)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Spain

Subject of commemoration: UNESCO: Garajonay National Park

Description of the design: The Garajonay National Park is situated in the middle of the island of La Gomera.in the Canary Islands archipelago, was registered on the World Heritage Sites list for being an outstanding well-preserved example of laurisilva (Laurel forest), an exceptional ecosystem of the living remnant of the old rainforests and warm temperate forests that occupied much of Europe and North Africa during the Tertiary.

The coin depicts a view of the ‘Roque de Agando’ and a detail of the ‘Laurisilva forest’. On the upper right hand and in capital letters are the word ‘ESPAÑA’ and the year of minting ‘2022’. At the top on the right hand side is the mint mark.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: First quarter 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---