• The seasonal migration of bovines towards the mountains looking for food reduces the time for closing and vaccinate the animals in plains. • A long season of intense rains limits the period of implementation of the campaign. • Rivers overflow in the zone, forming marshlands which prevent the entry in the area during long periods of time as there are no roads. • A long drought period when animals are in bad health, so vaccination is not suitable.
b. Epidemiological aspects.
• Extensive grazing livestock of familiar subsistence with self-consumption production. • Low livestock density (one bovine average each 30 hectares), consequently there is a low contact rate between susceptible animals. • Very few animal movement, specially of those that will be sent for local slaughterhouses. There is not animal flow towards other provinces. • Historically, a low occurrence of the disease in these provinces (San Juan S/P, La Rioja, 1985. Catamarca and Jujuy, 1991; Salta, 2003, without occurrence since 1993, and Mendoza 2001, without occurrence since 1990).
This strategy is similar to the one implemented in the nineties which helps to prevent outbreaks at national level during five years (1995/1999). • In the Border Control Plan area unlike the rest of the free zone, all susceptible domestic species that are vaccinated are individuallyidentified with ear tags. The vaccination is official, and the costs of the vaccines and operations are met by the govemment. Regional supervisors, SENASA veterinarians and hired vaccinators are responsible of the operative actions.
Although the vaccination periods of each Local Plan lasts between 60 and 120 days, each first or second vaccination period at national level, lasts almost SIX MONTHS each.

CAMPAIGNS IMPLEMENTATION
The Local Entities of Sanitary struggles are responsible for the implementation of the vaccination campaigns. The minutes of FMD and brucellosis vaccination, with an affidavit nature, provides evidence for the vaccination on behalf of the Local Plan staff. The minutes are issued in triplicate, the original is handed over to the owner and/or the people who is responsible for the vaccinated animals, the third copy is for the Local Plan and the second copy for the Local Office. The second copy is used to produce the reports every two weeks on the vaccinations that is carried out. SENASA pass on Local Entities of Sanitary Struggle the responsibility of implementing vaccination campaigns through the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Food Resolution N° 108/01. Each district located within the systematic vaccination area in the country have its Local Vaccination Plan. This Plan is produced by the respective Local Sanitary Entity and submitted to COPROSA (Provincial Animal Health Commiftees) for approval. After COPROSA's approval it is sent to CONALFA(National Committee of Struggle against FIVlD) and to SENASA for the definitive approval. The 361 Vaccination Plans of the country, with their 5900 agents and supervised and controlled by SENASA, are responsible for the implementation of the vaccination. The schedule establishes the required vaccination quantity for each Plan every two weeks, to be able to vaccinate all the bovines of its jurisdiction, within the period stipulated by SENASA.

VACCINATION SCHEDULE
Before each vaccination campaign starts, SENASA jointly with the respective COPROSAS and CONALFA, establishes the dates when each Local Plan in the country will perform the vaccination. This period may extend 60 or 90 days depending on the province or region. The dates of each Local Plan are different according to production and climatic features, as well as the dynamics of animals movement in each region, in order to meet an extensive coverage and a higher and more constant immunity throughout the year.
48. How do your future plans and strategies 

### for eradicating FMD determfne your vaccination polfcies? (e.g. when to vaccinate, which animals, how many times a year, what seasons of the year), and What are your vaccination plans in the region for the next 3 years?Going on with livestock systematic vaccination, and vaccinating twice a year bovines younger than 2 years old, and once a year adult bovines (elder than 2 years old). Furthermore, there are projects to widen free vaccination areas.

49. A/so, 

### please give details on record keeping practices in the 

### vaccination program, including the type of vaccine being used.
The vaccinator paticipating in the Local Sanitary Entity Operative Team perForms the vaccination in the establishment. He should agree previously with the animals' owner. Then, he issues the Vaccination Minutes where he reports all data regarding the vaccination (date, type of vaccination used, vaccinated animals by category, and the data regarding the animals' owner) and is signed by both the owner and vaccinator. These Vaccination Minutes are the basic sources of information, as the data are recorded in the SENASA Local Office computer system. From these reports data the "VACCINATION CAMPAIGNS MONITORING" (Resolution N° 815/02) is developed, which is formed by 8 statements sent by each Local Office to the specific Office of the Epidemiologic Management. At the beginning of the period the N° 1 STATEMENT (beginning) is sent and then successively from N° 2 STATEMENT up to N° 7, every 15 days, up to the end, when N° 8 STATEMENT is sent (close). This system, in force since the 2002 second campaigns, has the advantages of producing more accurate data along with its organization. The vaccine used in the vaccination campaigns is produced with oily coadjutor and saponine, which enlarges the animal immunity period, ofalmost 180 days in the first applications and of 360 days as from the fourth application. It is rendered inactive with binary ethylenine, being tetravalent, as it has the Fields 01 Virus, Cruzeiro A24, A2000 Argentina and A2001 Argentina, in its antigen mass. 

### 50. What system is /n p/ace 

### to ensure that all animals are vacc/nated?
Before starting the vaccination campaign, each Local Plan establishes the number of animals as follows: 15 days before the beginning of the vaccination period each SENASA Local Veterinarian issues a complete list of producers and the number of animals they have, through the 'Sanitary Management System' that all Local Offices computers have. The number is formed by: ® N° OF BOVINES VACCINATED IN THE LAST CAMPAIGN

+ N° OF INGOING BOVINES (Since the end of the last campaign) 13ASE

~ llE DA'CA • S.G.S. DATABASE • N° OF OUTGOING BOVINES (Since the end of the last campaign)

~ •-~ ~ :• ~This is an ebauuto nunnber neuordod for eanh pnoduoer in tha SGS, and ahou|d ba aduuted to 'ESTl0lATED'dats. asthero ono ahuodonwin emoh eatab|ishmantnotnacondad in tha oyubonnbebwoen oannpaignmwhich modih/

• 'S.G.E.'BOVlWESSTOCK RECOROED.(1) (Abnn|ubanun

~ o»r)
• N"OFCALVESB0R0S|NCETHELASTCAK0P/\|GN I. (EstimatetfiQunaaddedtotheproviousnumbar)

-
~

~ N"OFCALVESDEADS{NCETHELASTCAK8PA|GN ' Aaasumwewr oowouorco aYr*E SENASA vErsn/wAn, xmo uuaw/rrsoTo ryspLAw1s oAvo ospoxc r*s asG/ww/wu

numbermported thmughthe'nP1USTby theSENASA Loca|Vetehnarian and the Loca| Pban head to the Epidomology Oepartment on the veocinabon rma1 beginning day. Thefortnightdeve|oprnentia reported thrmugh'L|STS2TO7' ' thathavethedmtuofthevnodnetioncorriodmud duhnQthefortniQht(canopaigns monihohngandasseosrnant). Thio is used usbaoiatornonihorthonompaignandmeaaureitofina|neau|t.The ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BOVINES TO BE VACCINATED is the reference figure to be compared with the NUMBER OF BOVINES VACCINATED by the Local Plan every two weeks (reported in the Monitoring Statements N° 2 to N° 7). This allows to determine the 'development percentage of the Vaccine', and know whether the vaccination course is suitable. When the campaign is over, the NUMBER OF VACCINATED BOVINES is compared with the 'ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BOVINES TO BE VACCINATED DURING THE CAMPAIGN'. The following situations may result:
• EQUAL: when the estimated number agrees with the number of bovines finally vaccinated. • HIGHER: when the estimated data were lower than the real numbers. E.G. a lower number of bom calves was estimated.
• LOWER: when the estimated data were higher to the real numbers. E.G. a higher number of born calves was estimated or the animals movement to be slaughtered have a negative influence on slaughter movements since the list was done. THIS RESULT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE VACCINATION HAS BEEN DEVELOPED UNDER THE REAL EXISTING STOCK. When the campaign is over, the SENASA Local Veterinary verifies whether all producers recorded in the Local Office Sanitary Management System have vaccinated their bovines.

51. 

### Are vaccina#ed animals iden#ifieo' in a permanent manner?No, only the animals included in the Border Control Plan.



### 52. What is the pena/ty if an orvner does not vaccinate?
In case a producer failed to perForm his sanitary obligation, the Local Veterinary draws up the corresponding minutes stating the result of his inspection, bans the holding and the movements within it and calls on him to develop the vaccination immediately.



### 53. P/ease provide any data on verification of vaccination activities by the offscal services and on 

### compllance rates 

### for the past 5 years.
SENASA Resolution N° 623/02 establishes the duties and responsibilities of the Operative Group members, and how they have to perform their duties. An strict control on the actions performed by each member of this group is carried out both by the Technical Committee members and the SENASA Local Veterinary. The SENASA Resolution N° 33/02 establishes the audits that the SENASA Local Veterinary of the jurisdiction should develop on the Local Plan, particularly on the operative group activities, throughout the campaigns. This resolutions approves a Procedures Manual and a form for the audit on the Vaccination Plans. The official veterinary should control the vaccination conditions, the set of instruments used, the schedule, the vaccination compliance, sanitary news, data, biosecurity measures.

### 54. What is the tota/ population that is not vaccinated?
The area where the FMD Vaccination Plan is not performed includes the provinces of Neuquen, Rio Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz and Tierra del Fuego, with a bovine stock of almost 340.000 animals. With regards to the northern zone of the country, where the FMD Systematic Vaccination Plan is applied, sheep, pigs, goats and camelids are not vaccinated, excepting the Border Control Plan, where all susceptible species are massive and systematically vaccinated.



### 55. Are vaccinated anirrtals allowed to move into the zone where vaccination is not practiced? If not, what restrictions are imposed to prevent such movement?
SENASA Resolution N° 1051/02 (see Annex VI) bans the introduction of live animals of FMD susceptible species of any origin, condition and destination, into the 'Free FMD Area where Vaccination is not practised' and into the 'Surveillance Zone where Vaccination is not practised', in compliance with the cun

- ent indications of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE).



### 56. How is compliance monitored or enforced?
See question 

### What geographic barriers or regulatory measures exist to contro/ ani nal movement between the vaccination and non-vaccination zones?

### 57. Is active surveillance done in non-vaccination provinces that border the zone of vaccination?
The provinces where vaccination is not practised and that border the zone of vaccination are Neuquen and part of the province of Rio Negro, just south of Rio Negro river; both form a particular region, Northern Patagonia B created as surveillance area of the free area where vaccination is not practised (Southern Patagonia). The active surveillance activities carried out in this zone include serological samples and inspections to establishments and coldstores. With regards to the serological samples this zone is considered in the stratification developed for these systematic studies that are conducted annually (see 

### Annex IV Samples). In 2001, an special serological study was conducted in this zone and in southern Patagonia due to the sanitary barrier end in 2000, after Argentina attained the FMD free country condition. As a result of the 2001 and 2002 outbreaks, the study focused on detecting the virus activity in the region, and furthermore, on those establishments where animals were introduced from the north of Rio Negro river when the restrictions ended. These studies showed the absence of virus activity in this zone, keeping the FMD free condition in spite of the outbreaks in other zones. The inspections that are carried out in the establishments in this zone are included within the sanitary programs activities of some diseases, being more intensive in this zone the activities related to the sheep scabies, due to the wide predominance of this disease. Inspections in coldstores include both ovine and bovine species.

### 58. The po/yvalent vaccine contafns serotype 

### O, and subtypes A24, A2000, 

### and A2001 have been used. Have any studies been done on
cross 

### reactivity between A24, A2000, and A2001 subtypes? Was the vaccine tested for efficacy against A2000 and A2001 using combinations of subtype A?
Crossed protection tests in bovines has been carried out and their result was that A 24 strain ofFers a protection of 30% when challenged with the A 2001 strain or A 2000 strain, due to these results it was decided to add these strains to the vaccine formulation.

CROSSED IMMUNITY SURVEY IN BOVINES UIT VIRAL CHALLENGE OF A 2001 STRAIN
The SENASA official laboratory carries out the permanent characterization of all the FMD virus samples acting in the field, as part of its diagnosis routine. This serological follow-up has allowed the identification of two field virus A subtypes different from the regional A24 prototype vaccinal strains and from Argentina A87 and A79, as well as being different among them. This strains were called A2000 y A 2001.- Field samples MC 38796 from Gral Villegas, Province of Buenos Aires were taken as virus A 2000 prototype and field samples MC 267 from Trenque Lauquen, province of Buenos Aires, as virus A 2001.-Complement Fixation 50% studies (CF 50%) against a Hyperimmune sera (HS) of Virus A for subtyping allowed inferring that they were two subtypes serologically difFerent, which was confirmed after carrying out relations and kinship tests according to the CPFA procedures manual. -
These studies determined the following kinship values:
A 2000 against A 24 Cruzeiro R=32% A 2001 against 24 Cruzeiro R=51% A 2001 against A 2000 R=36%
These results allow concluding that they are two serologically different serotypes.
They were also verified when studying the samples in front of a Monoclonal Antibodies Panel (See attached report).-
The genomic sequencing of this samples established that A 2000 and A 2001 strains were samples that belonged to different lineage. (See attached report).
Wth the aim of performing crossed immunity studies, three monovalent oil vaccines of strains A 24 Cruzeiro, A 2000 and A 2001 were formulated, with similar antigen mass and 10 virgin bovines were vaccinated with each formula. A fourth group vaccinated with a 01 Campos, A 24 Cruzeiro and A 2000 vaccine formula was included.-The results of this test were the following:
• Bovines vaccinated with A 24 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 2001: 30% Protection.- • Bovines vaccinated with A 2000 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 2001: 0% Protection • Bovines vaccinated with A 2001 monovalent vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 2001: 80% Protection.- • Bovines vaccinated with 01 Campos, A 24 Cruzeiro and A 2000 trivalent vaccine, challenged at 30 DPV with 10000 Unweaned Mice Infecting Dose 50% (UMID 50%) of Virus A 2001: 50% Protection.-
Studies performed before crossed immunity in bovines of A 24 and A 2000 monovalent vaccines at 30 DPV gave a protection of 30% and 90% respectively, against viral challenge with A 2000.

Conclusions:
In view of the results obtained in the laboratory and crossed immunity in bovines responses, we conclude that there are significant difFerences between the strain acting in the field and the reference vaccine strains.-The protection given by vaccines formulated with A 24 Cruzeiro alone or associated is not enough in animals vaccinated for the first time, although it is known that protection in revaccinated animals is satisfactory 

### Separation from adjacent regions of higher risk through

physical or other barriers

59. 

### P/ease describe in more detail any existing geographic or physical barriers to the spread of FMD from other countries. Are there sha/low points on rivers, specially during the dry season, or unfenced areas on land where livestock can cross into Argentina from neighboring
cour tA

- fes?
Argentine borders are very extensive and they are formed mostly by geographic barriers (rivers, mountains, oceans), which form solid natural barriers that allow to implement prevention and control measures in those points of contact through bridges or crossings, where there is official staff. There some land borders and some fordable river courses that have been explained in the report already sent, where animals may cross borders looking for better pastures. Consequently sanitary risks are reduced in the higher risk zones as the border with Bolivia and Paraguay (62 per cent of the dried borders) through the activities included in the Border Control Plan with vaccination and identification of all susceptible animals along with coordinated activities with neighboring countries services and the active involvement of other official entities and security forces in border zones.G[i P&*cse mA*

~ oribxe /nore ym/ly thue gmogmaph/c emtent atid an/n/m/ of' Lhm wycc/matiOm U

- nd 1

- Ymn-wacclfmntion zmnes Ailsx» p/aaoe ceaoribe desun/e0an*maoeRnmaotio,ecfonpege 70, inc/umivg anymaps, The vamcinodun zono indudea aU Uhe zonea whena tha FK8D mysteniahc pnogrannisinfo/ceUhroughoudthecounhy. !t indudes the provincos of Jujuy. Ga!ta, Ce\anarca, La Rioia, Tuoumio. Saniiayo del Eute/o ` Saniu Fe. Co/hontao. ;Viiaionuo. Eoba R[ou, C6nJobu, BuenooAinea. La Pampa, San Juan ^ San Luia, yNendoze and som* noDiona ufRioNegouawdNeuqu6n, R[o Negm river and U)* N*u4u6n bo/de/ foxn the aouthem, burdar. aepuraiiog Lhio zooe 0om a vameinaiion on*u thai indudeu the oeat uTiha p/ovinoea oT Rio Neg/o aod Neuquen. ca ||ed Northa/n PutuAuoie B. aod oer/iee uuinu/vei||anoo ao(iviiieu Ti

- i\uzune axienJu up'Lo e FKAD ifee araa vvhore vaodnmtion h notpreciiaed thst has been recogn/ze6 by ()|E (K8ay. 2002) aoJ inu{udes ihe prnvinoey uf ChubuL Suobe Cruz unu' Tie/oy JeI FLjegO
Aonex Differe/3 amni(ary , cundiUono damogeph`a and n*gimna rogardinQ FiWU.
6t N/Ial gowgnephic &anienn mrnegu1ahory nnwasunms oyist to contro/ dnl Ina/000me11JUM UULWeeii theveuuH/aVunaildnmn-oamoi riaElonzmnemr

~SENASA Resdudon N^ 58X01. additiunsd reAu|mhons and SENASA Reso|uhon N" 10E1/02 euLaNish reQu|ahory n

- ieosunoo banning Uhe introduo\ionofauauepbbh*eninia}afromnun-vaoohationzonos Tha^e aoe \and uhed`pusta a\oogihe oa1u/u| uouroea ofBaoanoaa. Ljmay ond Riu Neg/o dvero, eawe!| aa Uxed uont/u| puutaon at/ategio/oadu end

62. kA117at was the putpmse and eMect mfResolwWrm 9/200 1 1, which I'Fmpf uwneTI&»damamiim,ybmwiet , inpmmai'iel42 0— F
The FMDoutbweakogewy/iseto Ne SEN.'

~ SARaaolti6on N»y dated Marcli 28. 2001. e-estaNiahingiheuonbo|pooio io ParmUe|42. min

- iinga\keeping !he FN1Darea whem vaooinahun is notpraofieed. AMomwardn, this neso|uUon waa ebnogo

~ ad by 8ENASA Reso/ubon N" 2J. oeobon 4. duied Aph/ 2G. 2001.whichwesintum ebo|ishedbySENAS/\Resu|uhon N^58. dated K8uy 24.2OU1.ounentk/infurno. |n a/| camea theae regu!ationo hava been approved lo nupport, keep and o'L/eog1hao il

-

iayaolia/y bania/a000t/o|a{o Paxo||e|42.

KA ~V~/~~N~~cr~ boio ~~~~~~~~>~ a-uld hY

~ '

Anove0N_-I'1s

63 ~ Wbemeaam

- esmminiflace6mpmweeit of

- ossiri g gs at pm ~~ (~~e~ ~ an 6mndar ~m~~~ w~ Aend mr w' ~ei~ M~ai ~~vm~stivestocac frotn be;ng brought acros.s the ritreis ot , e - outes betvveert

_

~ :a

~ iecii No®iiis <

.,
Sanitary barr,'ers were estabiishecl arriong the different reyions te preEaent crossings

o+ .,to .,thor th hnr.'a. t v r,:t ~ r,tr t f h!' L. ..

~ 1 r. thE

~. 1 .3~~~ ~ ~ .,~ En .,
~ Er p^.CS S. 2 ~~~ r`~ ..., ~~ ~ .^,2 p.OS S.r ~,~ ., ES.z...,tS

~~ E.. .,
~~ borders. located on strateglc places, tiqith trained staft during a!1 day 1ong. Interaction v,+ith security forces, by assistance and cooperation agreements, shall hP summed up to the controis. Regarding the Band hordErs most of thern have natura9 barriers, forming a physicai separation that reduces risk factors. ln the sectors where there are no natural barriers, the control mechanisms include strategic checks, mobile patrols and a permanent coordination writh ryationa; or provincia! entities %Anth constant presence at route controis throughout the nationail territory.

RRGENTlNE RBRtlBLdC BOR®ERS Tota9 Bord®rs :t:31: 34096 Protect-ed Brarders Sea Ceasfs Bordeis krii. .Fiuvial Bor ders km: A9ountain Borders nm: t,.9npa otected Bordea°s Us"ii7rotEcted Bordcrs nnn: 4675 kt

- n (v3%) 34 1 8R krri (25%) 4v91 krn (33°'0)

s ~ J,~ : qa;

~ ~ ~ i~~ d r.ii ~ ( ~ BORL;ERS n.__

~~ i '___a

~ .._ rt__.. t

_ ~ ~

' _ DICL13 rCUC![1LIdC RCfJUUlIG sotal Boreaers kn

- i: 1079 kir!KmunfluvialbonJars: 1092km -OnUruguayhvor 805km -[)nPapiriQuazCi/ivec 134km -OnSunAntoniohvac 94km -Oo|yuuz6hver. 129km Uop^u1eoG»d|andbnrdem
~ 27km B Yhgmyenzona: 27km
Uruguay TotalBo/demkrn. Uhhhn

- i KmonOuvia\burders: 86Gkm -OoUruguaylivec 49 1 'rlin

Paraguay /oe/uoroenaxn'. u'vwn Kmonfluvia|hurdans: 1185km -{}n Panend/iva/. 630km On Peregueyhv*r 290km -On Pi|oomoyohvec 265ko

- i Kmonunpnofooted|andbordes 2,85 km -PUoomayohveruhanQeduuuroe (Panta|ifinpxojaot) km
Bo|ivieRepubUo Toiu| Burdera kno. 765 kmKmoniluvia|bordee

~ 386km

~ On PUoumuyurivor 40km C)nQrandadaTahjahvoc 120km -OnBonnejuhmyr 126km -[}nminorhvercuum*a(fordab|ohvera): 100km Bondemununpnotoctodlandbondero: 380km 'PunaandAkip1anoregion

~ 385km
Chik»RepubUu TotadBordo/okm

~ 4591 km Kmunmounhainbordem, 4001 km -OnthoAndeerange: 4091km Kmununproteu!ed|andbondero: 380km. -Southom/egiun: 500km
BorderpoyuapprmedbySENASA Landposte:2O " Chi!e border - 8

~ UruAuaybordec 3 ° Bruzi|border

~ G ° Puraguaybordec 3

~ Bu|iviabordar 3
F|uvia|, sea and airporty. 24 F|uviaKeeopoah

~ 18 |n|ennadona|airports

~ 664.Qmyouhave any esbmatemoonoerning the amoant 

### and freqtimmcy cfoneudhorizedcrmmain&s betwemmcheok points?
M is impossible tu d*tennine Uhis amount aa b is Ulega| traffic bd tha maoauras mendoned in the previouo anovvecy ainn ot reducing the hok of suaooptib|aanima|oorpnoductsiUaga|inboduotion.

Al| nej*obuna ufin1pnrta ^yoorde6 duhnQ 2001120021'2003 and2O04 (up to Uho pneoenU aoe ehovved (n dhe A0NEX \U!i abng vxith the neoson ofUhe importoroniryrsjevUon
Thay ae coniro| pos1y auGhorized by SENASA for formign kade, that harmonize wjth noighbohng counthea and aU ihe uonbn| and aupamisinn actividos anm oani*d uui by th* Son/iue ofDoia" eta/l tke lovver nahe border onuoainga, harmuniZed wiih non aothorized couniries for pnmdocta moniimned bySENA3A. Thore oOher bondar audhorbies and nigratury oonbois in dneye postasinnathayeroouthohzadforpeopkemow*mont. |n thene coaos ` contro|n ofpanaangem entry ann oonductud by borderguaod authohtieo (Nabuno| Bondnr Po|ice or Nadona\ Navy) who inspeut if passangens cany ausoepUb|e anin1ua ur vage1al or unima| proUucts

66.YuunmmnbnnmdthatFMD-smmoeptible an|nomkoaraaUAomedentryafterm quarantine period at the officia| quarantine fani/by. Please o|arify the querantine requirennants and demcribe ony&emt p/ouedureafmrirnpurted

vacoinaton?
The onime|s knpnrted are p|aned ond*r quoronbno in tho axpurUng counhy. b*foreentehngtotheRopub|kcofArgentinu.Thenonddionsnyquinadnoganding FN1D, ane ihoee recnrnmended by the VVndd Organieation hor Anima| Heo|1h

Countries o/ zonea exporting bnvnao on dhe hoof (Umguay end Brazi Canada und USA— up to 2002 and 2003 reopecdvek), ahaop mnd goata on the hoof (Uruguuy.Austra|iaandChi|e),poncineoonUhehoof(UruAuayandBnuzi|).deer nn the hoof (Novv Zea|and ond Chi\o). and ||amos on the huof (Chi|a) are nacugnizad aa FKADfree counthsa orzunaa whure vacoinabon is not pnactioydUnce thoy enterthe Repu@ic ofArgentinu. anima|o intendad to breeding (bovnes/bube|inea. yheep, goato, pigo) corry outtha pon| entry quarantno in tha QuanonUne Lezansto Cepda| Pn*misea. |n tho cese ofnuminen1 bnoedons ` ooming from KAERCOSUR, they can undorQo quarondna outside the Of5cia| Lazareto. \n uf5oia|h/ approved pnaooises, underthe supen/ieion of tha SENASA Lona|Vatahnahan.dopandingonopanadvanaaaonsandthenumberofinvo1ved
\n a(|thecoseu. this period |asta un@ aUthatasts treatment, andvaccinoUon

Aocurding bn 8he abuvo'nnenUoned. duhnA Uhe 2002-2004 pehod. only FKAD susoopdb(o anima|o noning from FK8D fnao cuunthea urzonea (wbh orvvdhuut vaocinabon)huveentenadU1eRepubUuofArgenUna.|ntheoecaoea.andtaking into anoount the currnnt stmtus ofthe RepubUc ofArgendnm. no teota negonding thisdioaaaoanouanieduut.aanecummondedbythe0E. DuhngthequarantnainArgonhno.thaanhna|smvowycoinoh»duoingtheotrn\ne conasponding &o dhe No\iona| P!en, ifdhoirfina| deadnabon in ouroounUY ia a zonowhorevacdnotinn is pneoticed. On the onntnary, enima|o knbyndedtothe aouth of panoUe| 42^ are authohzed 8u enter in a dino/t thp ur by eir hnm the Ezoiza|ntennationa|Ajrportbz1heesdebUshmentofdeytinmdon.
SENASARasoludon N° 1354/94(seeAnnexVA ^ reyarding Uveaninla|simpod