alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42257.

#### FONG v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

General Motors Acceptance Corporation filed these proceedings against Donald Fong to foreclose a conditional sale contract in the manner provided by *Code*§ 67-701. After the property had been levied upon, the defendant in execution filed an affidavit of illegality and obtained possession of the property by giving bond conditioned for “the eventual payment of the condemnation money.” The levying officer returned the papers in the case to the court. When the case was called for trial, the court proceeded to an adjudication on the merits, and rendered judgment for plaintiff, overruling the illegality. Defendant took this appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his motion for new trial. *Held:*

In the foreclosure of a conditional sale contract the giving of a bond or an affidavit in forma pauperis in compliance with *Code*§ 67-803 is a condition precedent to the return of the papers to court for trial, and if a bond given is not conditioned substantially as the statute requires, the papers ought not to be returned to- court, thus suspending the sale. *Brantley v. Baker,*75 Ga. 676 (1); *Glass v. Austin,*28 Ga. App. 311 (1) (111 SE 84); *Dawson v. Planters’ Bank,*31 Ga. App. 530, 531 (121 SE 242); *Cox v. Taylor,*59 Ga. App. 326, 327 (200 SE 540). An affidavit of illegality which is not accompanied by a replevy bond or affidavit as prescribed by the Code is a mere nullity. *Bridges v. Melton,*34 Ga. App. 480 (1) (129 SE 913). The bond required by *Code*§ 67-803 is *603a bond conditioned for “the return of the property when called for by the levying officer.” The bond here, being conditioned for “the eventual payment of the condemnation money,” did not meet the requirement of the statute. The illegality was therefore not properly before the court, there was no case to try, and the court, not having jurisdiction of the subject matter of this litigation, could not proceed to an adjudication on the merits. The court should have dismissed the illegality with direction that the execution proceed and that the property be held to satisfy the fi. fa. The grounds of error enumerated by defendant are moot.

Argued September 6, 1966

Decided November 14, 1966.

*Beryl H. Weiner, Boy J. Leite, Jr.,*for appellant.

*A. Mims Wilkinson, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further action consistent with this opinion.*

*Jordan and Eherhardt, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Accustem Sciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keeren Shah, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



Dated:
April 15, 2022



|       | /s/
    Keeren Shah                                     | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Keeren
                                            Shah | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer                                 |
§ 1073.301 Scope. ( a ) These salary offset regulations should be read in conjunction with 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart K, and apply to the collection of debts owed by employees of the Bureau or other Federal agencies.
( b ) These salary offset procedures do not apply: ( 1 ) Where an employee consents to the recovery of a debt from his current pay account;
( 2 ) To debts arising under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, U.S. Code), the tariff laws of the United States, or to any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute.
( c ) These procedures do not preclude an employee from requesting a waiver of an erroneous payment under 5 U.S.C. 5584, or from questioning the amount or validity of a debt, in the manner specified by law or these agency regulations. This subpart also does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of the collection of a debt under any other applicable statutory authority.
( d ) When possible, salary offset through centralized administrative offset procedures should be attempted before seeking salary offset from a paying agency different than the creditor agency.
February 26, 1999

       Securities and Exchange Commission 
       450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
       Washington, D.C. 20549 

            Re:  Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. 
                    Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 1999
                    SEC file no.  0-17378 

       Dear Sir or Madam:

       Transmitted herewith through the EDGAR system is Form 10-QSB for the 
quarter ended January 31, 1999 for Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.  Should you have 
any questions or comments concerning this matter please contact the 
undersigned at 303-794-2000.



       Sincerely, 



       Roger Hurst 
       President 


<PAGE>
§ 1261.14 Vacant Bank directorships. ( a ) *Filling unexpired terms.* ( 1 ) When a vacancy occurs on the board of directors of any Bank, the board of directors of the Bank shall elect, by a majority vote of the remaining Bank directors sitting as a board, an individual to fill the unexpired term of office of the vacant directorship, regardless of whether the remaining Bank directors constitute a quorum of the Bank's board of directors.
( 2 ) The board of directors of the Bank may fill an anticipated vacancy prior to the effective date of the vacancy, provided the board does so no sooner than the date of the regularly scheduled board meeting that occurs immediately prior to the effective date of the vacancy.
( 3 ) The board of directors shall elect only an individual who satisfies all the eligibility requirements in the Bank Act and in this subpart that applied to his or her predecessor and, for independent directorships, also satisfies any of the qualifications in the Bank Act or this subpart. If a Bank does not have at least two sitting public interest independent directors, the board of directors of the Bank shall designate the directorship as a public interest directorship and shall elect an individual who satisfies a public interest independent directorship qualification in the Bank Act or in this subpart.
( b ) *Verifying eligibility.* Prior to any election by the board of directors, the Bank shall obtain an executed member director eligibility certification form prescribed by FHFA from each individual being considered to fill a member directorship and an executed independent director application form prescribed by FHFA from each individual being considered to fill an independent directorship. Using the executed forms, each Bank shall verify each individual's eligibility and, as to independent directors, also shall verify the individual's qualifications. Before any independent director is elected by the board of directors of a Bank, the Bank shall deliver to FHFA for its review a copy of the application form of each individual being considered by the board. The Bank shall retain the information it receives in accordance with § 1261.7(c) and (d).
( c ) *Notification.* Promptly after allowing the individual to assume the directorship, as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a Bank shall notify FHFA and each member located in the Bank's district in writing of the following: ( 1 ) For each member directorship filled by the board of a Bank, the name of the director, the name, location, and FHFA ID number of the member the director serves, the director's title or position with the member, the voting State that the director represents, and the expiration date of the director's term of office; and
( 2 ) For each independent directorship filled by the board of a Bank, the name of the director, the name and location of the organization with which the director is affiliated, if any, the director's title or position with such organization, and the expiration date of the director's term of office.
[74 FR 51464, Oct. 7, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 17039, Apr. 5, 2010]
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
  





 
 January 13, 2014 

Mr. Peter Stern 
 60
Columbus Circle 
 New York, NY 10023 

Dear Peter: 
 Pursuant to
Section 1 of the Employment Agreement effective as of November 1, 2011 between you and Time Warner Cable Inc. (the “Agreement”), the Agreement expires on October 31, 2014. This letter offers to amend the Agreement to extend
the term through December 31, 2016. All other provisions of the Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 

Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing extension of the term of your Agreement by executing this letter no later than
January 31, 2014 and returning it immediately via interoffice mail to: Brad Donnelly, HR-Executive Compensation, Charlotte, NC. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

		
	 By:
		 /s/ Rob Marcus

			 Rob Marcus

			 Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer



  

			
	 AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

	
	 Peter Stern

	 /s/ Peter Stern

		
	 Date:    
		         January 15, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50769-50770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23668]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Docket No.: 0909181308-91313-01]


Privacy Act Altered System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology (NIST).

ACTION: Notice; COMMERCE/NIST-7, NIST Emergency Locator System.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) publishes this notice to 
announce the effective date of a Privacy Act System of Records notice 
entitled COMMERCE/NIST-7, NIST Emergency Locator System.

DATES: The system of records becomes effective on October 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: For a copy of the system of records please mail requests to 
Catherine S. Fletcher, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
100 Bureau Drive--Stop 1710, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine S. Fletcher, National 
Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive--Stop 1710, 
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1710.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 1, 2007, the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology published and requested comments on a proposed 
Privacy Act System of Records notice entitled COMMERCE/NIST-7, NIST 
Emergency Locator System. No comments were received in response to the 
request for comments. By this

[[Page 50770]]

notice, the National Institute of Standards and Technology is adopting 
the proposed system as final without changes effective October 1, 2009.

    Dated: September 25, 2009.
Brenda Dolan,
 Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Officer, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.
[FR Doc. E9-23668 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Schlumberger Technology * Original Mandamus Proceeding

Corporation and The Dow Chemical

Company,

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 204

- CV * October 24 , 201 9

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C.J.

Dissenting Memorandum Opinion by

Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and c oncludes that Relator s ’

petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted . Therefore, in

accordance with this court’s opinion, we conditionally grant Relators’ petition for

writ of mandamus. We direct the Honorable Jeffrey Todd Robnett to vacate the

order that he signed on May 28, 2019, which denied Relators’ motion to dismiss,

and to enter an order that di smisses the case. A writ of mandamus will issue only

if Judge Robnett fails to act by November 4, 2019.
§ 1270.12 Law governing rights and obligations of Banks, FHFA, Office of Finance, United States and Federal Reserve Banks; rights of any Person against Banks, FHFA, Office of Finance, United States and Federal Reserve Banks. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the rights and obligations of the Banks, FHFA, the Director, the Office of Finance, the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: A Book-entry consolidated obligation or Security Entitlement and the operation of the Book-entry system, as it applies to consolidated obligations; and the rights of any Person, including a Participant, against the Banks, FHFA, the Director, the Office of Finance, the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: A Book-entry consolidated obligation or Security Entitlement and the operation of the Book-entry system, as it applies to consolidated obligations; are governed solely by regulations of FHFA, including the regulations of this part 1270, the applicable offering notice, applicable procedures established by the Office of Finance, and Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars.
( b ) A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Participant and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 1270.14(c)(1), is governed by the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of the jurisdiction where the head office of the Federal Reserve Bank maintaining the Participant's Securities Account is located. A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Person that is not a Participant, and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 1270.14(c)(1), is governed by the law determined in the manner specified in § 1270.13.
( c ) If the jurisdiction specified in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of this section is a State that has not adopted Revised Article 8, then the law specified in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of this section shall be the law of that State as though Revised Article 8 had been adopted by that State.
§ 61.66 Financial management. ( a ) All recipients must comply with applicable requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards under 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) All entities receiving assistance under this part must use a financial management system that follows generally accepted accounting principles and meets the requirements set forth under 2 CFR part 200. All recipients must implement the requirements of 2 CFR part 200 when determining costs reimbursable under all awards issued under this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[80 FR 43323, July 22, 2015]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries

As of October 31, 1996, the Companies subsidiaries were:

The Lamar Corporation
Interstate Logos, Inc.
Lamar Advertising of Colorado Springs, Inc.
Lamar Advertising of Jackson, Inc.
Lamar Advertising of Mobile, Inc.
Lamar Advertising of South Georgia, Inc.
Lamar Advertising of South Mississippi, Inc.
Pensacola Transit, Inc.
Texas General Partner, Inc.
Texas Limited Partnership
Tennessee Limited Partner, Inc.
Tennessee Limited Partnership
Tennessee Limited Partnership II
TLC Properties, Inc.
Lamar Air, LLC
PCS, Inc.
Missouri Logo, Inc.
Nebraska Logos, Inc.
Oklahoma Logos, Inc.
Utah Logos, Inc.
Ohio Logos, Inc.
Texas Logos, Inc.
Mississippi Logos, Inc.
Georgia Logos, Inc.
South Carolina Logos, Inc.
Virginia Logos, Inc.
Minnesota Logos, Inc.
New Jersey Logos, Inc.
Michigan Logos, Inc.
Tennessee Logos, Inc.
Kansas Logos, Inc.
#### § 1207.4 Limitations.

The regulations in this part do not, are not intended to, and should not be construed to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law, in equity, or through administrative proceeding, by any party against FHFA, the United States, its other departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents.
§ 1070.12 Publication in the *Federal Register*. ( a ) *Requirement.* The CFPB shall separately state, publish and maintain current in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public the following information: ( 1 ) Descriptions of its central and field organization and the established place at which, the persons from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submissions or requests, or obtain decisions;
( 2 ) Statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available;
( 3 ) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations;
( 4 ) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the CFPB; and
( 5 ) Each amendment, revision, or repeal of matters referred to in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Publication of the information under paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to the application of the FOIA exemptions and exclusions (5 U.S.C. 552(b) and (c)) and the limitations provided in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1).
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Belize

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Belize			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Belize 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Belize

During the review period, the government made its enacted budget, end-of-year report, and information on debt obligations widely accessible to the public, including online.  However, it did not publish an executive budget proposal within a reasonable period.  Information on debt obligations were widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  Publicly available budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, including natural resource revenues.  Budget information was generally reliable.  While the supreme audit institution met international standards of independence, it did not publish audit reports within a reasonable period.

Belize’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period; and
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution audits the government’s executed budget and makes audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Belize 

Tags

BelizeBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  June 9, 2009 By:/s/ James R. Musick______________ Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00507

- CR

T RENTON M ARCUS B ROWN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 7

of Tar rant Cou nty (1545505)

August 22, 2019

Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

cou rt is a ffirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2671 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

\Alpha3\E\HSEENR\h2671--enr.xml [file 1 of 1]

        H.R.2671

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 North Miami 
     Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The United States courthouse at 301 North Miami Avenue, Miami, 
Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``C. Clyde Atkins 
United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```