alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022208EN.01000201.xml

| 24.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 May 2022

(2022/C 208/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0659 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84783 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4918 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0310 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,594 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 381,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6210 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9470 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,8672 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4982 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3626 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3664 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6463 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4639 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7437 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0850 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5275 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 609,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6782 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,686 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,410 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1623 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,1273 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,6795 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0659

JPY

Japanese yen

136,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84783

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4918

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0310

ISK

Iceland króna

139,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,594

HUF

Hungarian forint

381,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6210

RON

Romanian leu

4,9470

TRY

Turkish lira

16,8672

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4982

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3626

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3664

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6463

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4639

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,19

ZAR

South African rand

16,7437

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0850

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5275

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 609,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6782

PHP

Philippine peso

55,686

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,410

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1623

MXN

Mexican peso

21,1273

INR

Indian rupee

82,6795

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
42391.

#### McINTOSH v. MARVIN M. BLACK COMPANY.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. An action brought by the assignee of a written contract in its own name must affirmatively show that the transfer or assignment was in writing in order to withstand a proper demurrer. *Foster v. Sutlive,*110 Ga. 297 (34 SE 1037); *Thornton v. Reeve,*41 Ga. App. 446 (153 SE 436); *Alropa Corp. v. Richardson,*58 Ga. App. 656, 657 (199 SE 666); *Fenner & Beane v. Nelson,*64 Ga. App. 600, 607 (13 SE2d 694). Accordingly, where the sole allegation as to the assignment of the contract sued on was that the action was brought by “Marvin M. Black Company as asignee [sic] of Marvin M. Black and Joeanne R. Black, d/b/a Marvin M. Black Company, a contractor,” the court erred in its judgment overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the petition.

2. The demurrer to the petition having been erroneously overruled, the subsequent trial and the verdict and judgment *778lor the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, were nugatory.

Argued November 8, 1966

Decided November 28, 1966

Rehearing denied December 13, 1966.

*Cohen, Kohler, Barnwell & Chambers, John W. Chambers,*for appellant.

*T. Charles Allen,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
#### COLLIER MANUFACTURING CO. v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 32; 271 U. S. 680]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court June 1, 1926.
# C_2021497EN.01001901.xml

| 10.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 497/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 497/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 December 2021

(2021/C 497/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1311 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2570 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0446 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1550 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,434 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 365,81 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6045 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,6175 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5840 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4363 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8186 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6672 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5446 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0190 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2114 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5305 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 265,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7693 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,045 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,2976 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,960 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2718 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8011 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,5075 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1311

JPY

Japanese yen

128,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85740

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2570

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0446

ISK

Iceland króna

147,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1550

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,434

HUF

Hungarian forint

365,81

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6045

RON

Romanian leu

4,9493

TRY

Turkish lira

15,6175

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5840

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4363

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8186

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6672

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5446

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,42

ZAR

South African rand

18,0190

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2114

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5305

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 265,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7693

PHP

Philippine peso

57,045

RUB

Russian rouble

83,2976

THB

Thai baht

37,960

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2718

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8011

INR

Indian rupee

85,5075

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2022138EN.01000301.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/3

---

DECISION OF THE GENERAL COURT

of 9 February 2022

on judicial vacations

(2022/C 138/03)

THE GENERAL COURT

Having regard to Article 41(2) of the Rules of Procedure,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

For the judicial year beginning on 1 September 2022, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 41(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2022: from Monday 19 December 2022 to Sunday 8 January 2023 inclusive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2022: from Monday 19 December 2022 to Sunday 8 January 2023 inclusive;

| — | Easter 2023: from Monday 3 April 2023 to Sunday 16 April 2023 inclusive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2023: from Monday 3 April 2023 to Sunday 16 April 2023 inclusive;

| — | Summer 2023: from Sunday 16 July 2023 to Thursday 31 August 2023 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2023: from Sunday 16 July 2023 to Thursday 31 August 2023 inclusive.

Article 2

This decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Luxembourg, 8 March 2022.

Registrar

E. COULON

President

M. VAN DER WOUDE

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50850 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-257-5

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Hugo Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1858-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1858-DR), dated September 24, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 25, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 24, 2009.

Carroll, Chattooga, and Stephens Counties for Individual Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-23955 Filed 10-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                54,547
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          5,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     248,148
<PP&E>                                                87,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                        86,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       249,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                280,497
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              40,071
<OTHER-SE>                                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         249,287
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (85,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (85,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2688 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2688

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, as the ``Dolph S. Briscoe, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2007

 Mr. Rodriguez (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Poe, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
  Texas, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. 
  Culberson, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. McCaul of 
    Texas, Mr. Conaway, Ms. Granger, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
    Hinojosa, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Edwards, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. 
    Neugebauer, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Lampson, Mr. 
 Marchant, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Gene 
Green of Texas, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Carter, and Mr. 
  Sessions) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, as the ``Dolph S. Briscoe, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOLPH S. BRISCOE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dolph S. Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dolph S. 
Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2644

To suspend temporarily the duty on Procion Navy H–EXL. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Procion Navy H–EXL.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON PROCION NAVY H–

4 EXL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by striking heading 9902.32.50 and inserting the 

8 following:
2

•HR 2644 IH 

‘‘ 9902.32.50 Mixture of 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 4-

amino-3,6-bis[[5-[[4-chloro-6-[(2-methyl-4-

sulfophenyl) amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-

2-sulfophenyl]azo]-5-hydroxy-, hexasodium salt 

(CAS No. 186554–27–8); and 1,5-

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2-((8-((4-chloro-6-

((3-(((4-chloro-6-((7-((1,5-disulfo-2-

naphthalenyl)azo)-8-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-1-

naphthlenyl)amino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino) 

methyl)phenyl)amino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-

yl)amino)-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2-

naphthalenyl)azo)-, octa- (CAS No. 186554–

26–7) (the foregoing mixture provided for in 

subheading 3204.16.30) ................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2710

 To repeal and modify certain provisions of law relating to the review 
                 of the detention of enemy combatants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2007

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal and modify certain provisions of law relating to the review 
                 of the detention of enemy combatants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO 
              REVIEW OF DETENTION OF ENEMY COMBATANTS.

    (a) Repeal of Limitation on Judicial Review of Detention of Enemy 
Combatants.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Repeal of Review of Decisions of Combatant Status Review 
Tribunals of Propriety of Detention.--Section 1005(e) of the Detainee 
Treatment Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-148; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) and 
section 1405(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-
163; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) are each amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (c) Modification of Review of Military Commission Procedures and 
Actions.--Section 950j of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Limited Review of Military Commission Procedures and 
Actions.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or in section 
2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court, justice, or judge 
shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of 
action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the 
date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating 
to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under 
this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of 
military commissions under this chapter.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

===============================================================================
                                   EXHIBIT 4.1

                             CHINA VENTURES LIMITED
                      (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands)

                                SHARE CERTIFICATE


Certificate Number: 002                               Number of Shares: 123,750

     This Certifies that HONG YANG is the registered holder of ONE HUNDRED
TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY ORDINARY SHARES OF US $0.001
EACH, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company and
transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person or
by Attorney only upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

     In Witness Whereof, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed.

     This 16th day of December, 1999.

                                            ------------------------------
                                            For Trident Directors (Cayman) Ltd.
                                            Director

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                  TRANSFER FORM

For value received I/We ______________________________________________ do hereby
transfer unto _______________________________________________
____________________________________________________ shares standing in my/our
name in the books of the company whose certificate appears above.

Transferor:__________________________ Date:__________________________


===============================================================================
#### ISELIN v. UNITED STATES

[59 C. Cls. 654; 270 U. S. 245]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *reversed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

1. Paragraph 3 of section 800 (a) of revenue act of 1918, laying taxes on theater and opera tickets sold at news stands, hotels, etc., for more than the “ established price ” at the ticket office of the theater or opera house, *helé*inapplicable to sale by a stockholder of box tickets, issued as an incident of his investment in an opera-house company, which were not sold at the box office and for which there was no established price.

2. A statute imposing taxes with particularity, and in plain, unambiguous language, can not be enlarged by construction to cover other cases omitted through presumable inadvertence of the legislature.

3. An administrative practice which enlarges the scope of an unambiguous statute, and which is neither uniform, general, nor long continued, can not be given legal force or effect, nor be accepted as a reason why subsequent reenactment of the statute without change should be taken as a legislative interpretation of its original meaning as justifying such practice.

Mr. Justice BhaNdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 1, 1926.
# C_2021338EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 338/01)

Last publication

OJ C 329, 16.8.2021

Past publications

OJ C 320, 9.8.2021

OJ C 310, 2.8.2021

OJ C 297, 26.7.2021

OJ C 289, 19.7.2021

OJ C 278, 12.7.2021

OJ C 263, 5.7.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---