# Official Journal C 340/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 340 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5730 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 340

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5730 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 340/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2014/C 340/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7268 — CSAV/HGV/Kühne Maritime/Hapag-Lloyd AG) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2014/C 340/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7241 — Advent International/Bain Capital Investors/Nets Holding) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 340/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2014/C 340/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7268 — CSAV/HGV/Kühne Maritime/Hapag-Lloyd AG) (
  1
  )

1

1

2014/C 340/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7241 — Advent International/Bain Capital Investors/Nets Holding) (
  1
  )

1

2

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2014/C 340/04 | Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 15 September 2014 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 340/05 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2014/C 340/04

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 15 September 2014 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament

3

European Commission

2014/C 340/05

Euro exchange rates

5

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 340/06 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 6 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 340/06

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 340/01

On 23 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7391. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7391. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7268 — CSAV/HGV/Kühne Maritime/Hapag-Lloyd AG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 340/02

On 11 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7268. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7268. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7241 — Advent International/Bain Capital Investors/Nets Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 340/03

On 8 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7241. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7241. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/3

---

DECISION OF THE BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 15 September 2014

amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament

2014/C 340/04

THE BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 223(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (1) (‘the Statute’),

Having regard to Rules 10 and 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | Some Members of the European Parliament continue to be paid salary, transitional allowance and pension in accordance with their respective national systems, having exercised the option provided for in Article 25 of the Statute in 2009. Such decisions are ‘final and irrevocable’ according to Article 26(2) of the Statute and are effective ‘for the entire duration of their membership of the European Parliament’ according to Article 25(1) of the Statute. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Some Members of the European Parliament continue to be paid salary, transitional allowance and pension in accordance with their respective national systems, having exercised the option provided for in Article 25 of the Statute in 2009. Such decisions are ‘final and irrevocable’ according to Article 26(2) of the Statute and are effective ‘for the entire duration of their membership of the European Parliament’ according to Article 25(1) of the Statute.

| (2) | Under Article 81(4) of the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2) (‘the Implementing Measures’), such Members remain entitled to reimbursement of medical expenses by Parliament provided that they are in receipt of a national pension and that they do not enjoy primary cover against the risk of illness. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under Article 81(4) of the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2) (‘the Implementing Measures’), such Members remain entitled to reimbursement of medical expenses by Parliament provided that they are in receipt of a national pension and that they do not enjoy primary cover against the risk of illness.

| (3) | The application of Article 81(4) of the Implementing Measures has proved insufficient to cover all circumstances in which a Member should be entitled to claim reimbursement of medical expenses from Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The application of Article 81(4) of the Implementing Measures has proved insufficient to cover all circumstances in which a Member should be entitled to claim reimbursement of medical expenses from Parliament.

| (4) | Where, during a Member’s mandate, he or she suffers a recognised serious illness preventing the completion of that mandate, Parliament should, subject to the fulfilment of appropriate conditions, ensure that the necessary ongoing treatment can be continued for as long as is medically necessary. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Where, during a Member’s mandate, he or she suffers a recognised serious illness preventing the completion of that mandate, Parliament should, subject to the fulfilment of appropriate conditions, ensure that the necessary ongoing treatment can be continued for as long as is medically necessary.

| (5) | In particular, reimbursement of medical expenses should be limited to cases in which the serious illness was caused by an event which occurred during the mandate and prevented the Member from exercising the last part thereof, that illness was recognised to be a serious illness by Parliament during the mandate and the treatment of the illness was initiated during the Member’s mandate. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In particular, reimbursement of medical expenses should be limited to cases in which the serious illness was caused by an event which occurred during the mandate and prevented the Member from exercising the last part thereof, that illness was recognised to be a serious illness by Parliament during the mandate and the treatment of the illness was initiated during the Member’s mandate.

| (6) | In addition, where medical expenses are partially covered at national level, Parliament’s liability for such expenses should be complementary only, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In addition, where medical expenses are partially covered at national level, Parliament’s liability for such expenses should be complementary only,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 81 of the Implementing Measures, the following paragraph is added:

‘5.   The former Members who are in receipt of a national pension, pursuant to Article 25 or Article 29 of the Statute, and are suffering from a recognised serious illness shall be entitled to reimbursement of their medical expenses related to the continuation of an ongoing treatment, in accordance with the conditions laid down in these implementing measures, provided that:

| (a) | the serious illness was caused by an event which occurred during the mandate and prevented the Member from exercising the last part thereof; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the serious illness was caused by an event which occurred during the mandate and prevented the Member from exercising the last part thereof;

| (b) | the illness was recognised as a serious illness by Parliament during the Member’s mandate; and, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the illness was recognised as a serious illness by Parliament during the Member’s mandate; and,

| (c) | the treatment of the illness was initiated during the Member’s mandate. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the treatment of the illness was initiated during the Member’s mandate.

If the former Member enjoys a primary cover, this entitlement shall apply on a complementary basis, i.e. only for those costs which are not covered by the primary cover.’.

Article 2

1.   This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

2.   This Decision shall apply from 1 July 2014.

---

(1)  Decision 2005/684/EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ L 262, 7.10.2005, p. 1).

1

(2)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ C 159, 13.7.2009, p. 1).

2

---

European Commission

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 September 2014

2014/C 340/05

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2701 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4432 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78270 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2018 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2071 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1960 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,540 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1827 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9047 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4555 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4172 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8625 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6351 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6182 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3604 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8143 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 464,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1440 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,248 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,1927 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,132 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1431 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1845 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,2572 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2701

JPY

Japanese yen

138,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4432

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78270

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2018

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2071

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1960

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,540

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1827

RON

Romanian leu

4,4125

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9047

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4555

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4172

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8625

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6351

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6182

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,86

ZAR

South African rand

14,3604

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8143

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 464,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1440

PHP

Philippine peso

57,248

RUB

Russian rouble

50,1927

THB

Thai baht

41,132

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1431

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1845

INR

Indian rupee

78,2572

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

V Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/6

---

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

2014/C 340/06

This publication confers the right to oppose the application pursuant to Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (1).

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TSG

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 509/2006

on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed
   (2)

‘HEUMILCH’/‘HAYMILK’/‘LATTE FIENO’/‘LAIT DE FOIN’/‘LECHE DE HENO’

EC No: AT-TSG-0007-01035 — 27.8.2012

1.   Name and address of the applicant group

| Name: | ARGE Heumilch Österreich |
| --- | --- |
| Address: | Grabenweg 68, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria |
| Tel. | +43 512345245 |
| E-mail: | office@heumilch.at |

Name:

ARGE Heumilch Österreich

Address:

Grabenweg 68, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Tel.

+43 512345245

E-mail:

office@heumilch.at

2.   Member State or Third Country

Austria

3.   Product specification

3.1.   Names to be registered

‘Heumilch’ (DE); ‘Haymilk’ (EN); ‘Latte fieno’ (IT); ‘Lait de foin’ (FR); ‘Leche de heno’ (ES)

3.2.   Whether the name

☐
  is specific in itself

☒
  expresses the specific character of the agricultural product or foodstuff

Haymilk production is the most natural form of milk production. The milk comes from animals in traditional, sustainable dairy farms. The key difference between standard milk and haymilk, and haymilk’s traditional character, stems from the fact that as in the earliest form of milk production, animals are not fed fermented fodder. Since the 1960s, on account of the industrialisation and mechanisation of farming, the production of silage (fermented fodder) has become increasingly popular, thus reducing fresh-fodder farming. Moreover, regulations forbid the use of animals and feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation. The feeding procedure is adapted to match seasonal changes: in the ‘green-feeding period’, animals are fed fresh grass and foliage and some hay and forms of feed permitted under point 3.6; in the winter period, animals are fed hay, or other forms of feed permitted under point 3.6.

3.3.   Whether reservation of the name is sought under Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006

☒
  Registration with reservation of the name

☐
  Registration, without reservation of the name

3.4.   Type of product

Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

3.5.   Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff to which the name under point 3.1 applies

Cow’s milk in accordance with the applicable legislation.

3.6.   Description of the production method of the agricultural product or foodstuff to which the name under point 3.1 applies

Haymilk is produced according to traditional production conditions that comply with the ‘Heumilchregulativ’ (regulations on haymilk production). This form of milk is distinguished by rules forbidding the use of fermented fodder, such as silage, and rules forbidding the use of animals and feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation.

‘Heumilchregulativ’

| — | ‘Haymilk’ is a form of cow’s milk extracted from lactating cows, produced by dairy farmers who have undertaken to comply with the following criteria: no animals or feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation may be used. |
| --- | --- |

—

‘Haymilk’ is a form of cow’s milk extracted from lactating cows, produced by dairy farmers who have undertaken to comply with the following criteria: no animals or feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation may be used.

Permitted types of feed

| — | The animals are mainly fed fresh grass and foliage during the ‘green-feeding period’, and hay in the winter period. Roughage must make up at least 75 % of the daily ration of dry feed. |
| --- | --- |

—

The animals are mainly fed fresh grass and foliage during the ‘green-feeding period’, and hay in the winter period. Roughage must make up at least 75 % of the daily ration of dry feed.

| — | The following auxiliary forms of feed are permitted: green rapeseed, green maize, green rye and fodder beets, and hay, lucerne and maize pellets. |
| --- | --- |

—

The following auxiliary forms of feed are permitted: green rapeseed, green maize, green rye and fodder beets, and hay, lucerne and maize pellets.

| — | The following cereal crops are also permitted, in their conventional marketed form and in composites with bran, pellets, etc.: wheat, barley, oats, triticale, rye and maize. |
| --- | --- |

—

The following cereal crops are also permitted, in their conventional marketed form and in composites with bran, pellets, etc.: wheat, barley, oats, triticale, rye and maize.

| — | The following may also be used as feed: beans, field peas, oleaginous fruits, and extraction meal or cakes. |
| --- | --- |

—

The following may also be used as feed: beans, field peas, oleaginous fruits, and extraction meal or cakes.

Forbidden types of feed

| — | The following types of feed are prohibited: silage (fermented fodder), moist hay and fermented hay. |
| --- | --- |

—

The following types of feed are prohibited: silage (fermented fodder), moist hay and fermented hay.

| — | Animals may not be fed by-products from breweries, distilleries, fruit pressing, or other by-products from the food industry, such as wet brewer’s grains or wet cuttings. Exception: dry cuttings as a by-product of sugar manufacturing, and dry protein feed produced during grain processing. |
| --- | --- |

—

Animals may not be fed by-products from breweries, distilleries, fruit pressing, or other by-products from the food industry, such as wet brewer’s grains or wet cuttings. Exception: dry cuttings as a by-product of sugar manufacturing, and dry protein feed produced during grain processing.

| — | Lactating animals may not be fed any form of wet fodder. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lactating animals may not be fed any form of wet fodder.

| — | Animals may not be fed products of animal origin (milk, whey, meat-and-bone meal, etc.), except for young cows, which may be fed milk and whey. |
| --- | --- |

—

Animals may not be fed products of animal origin (milk, whey, meat-and-bone meal, etc.), except for young cows, which may be fed milk and whey.

| — | Animals may not be fed garden waste, fallen fruit, potatoes or urea. |
| --- | --- |

—

Animals may not be fed garden waste, fallen fruit, potatoes or urea.

Fertilisation conditions

| — | The use of sewage sludge, sewage sludge products, or compost from municipal treatment plants is prohibited on all areas agriculturally exploited by the milk supplier. |
| --- | --- |

—

The use of sewage sludge, sewage sludge products, or compost from municipal treatment plants is prohibited on all areas agriculturally exploited by the milk supplier.

| — | Milk suppliers must wait at least three weeks after manure spreading before use of land to graze livestock. |
| --- | --- |

—

Milk suppliers must wait at least three weeks after manure spreading before use of land to graze livestock.

Use of chemical auxiliary substances

| — | Only the selective use of synthetic chemical pesticides under the expert supervision of agronomic specialists, and the targeting of specific sites in any of the green fodder areas of the dairy farm is permitted. |
| --- | --- |

—

Only the selective use of synthetic chemical pesticides under the expert supervision of agronomic specialists, and the targeting of specific sites in any of the green fodder areas of the dairy farm is permitted.

| — | Permitted fly sprays may be used in dairy stalls only when the lactating cows are absent. |
| --- | --- |

—

Permitted fly sprays may be used in dairy stalls only when the lactating cows are absent.

Delivery prohibitions

| — | Milk may not be delivered as ‘haymilk’ within 10 days after calving. |
| --- | --- |

—

Milk may not be delivered as ‘haymilk’ within 10 days after calving.

| — | When cows that have been fed silage (fermented fodder) are used, there must be a waiting period of least 14 days. |
| --- | --- |

—

When cows that have been fed silage (fermented fodder) are used, there must be a waiting period of least 14 days.

| — | As regards alpine animals on their farms which have been fed silage (fermented fodder), either they must be fed silage-free food for 14 days before they are driven up to alpine pastures, or their milk can be classed as ‘haymilk’ only once they have spent 14 days on alpine pastures (owned by the haymilk supplier). No silage may be produced or used as feed on the alpine pasture. |
| --- | --- |

—

As regards alpine animals on their farms which have been fed silage (fermented fodder), either they must be fed silage-free food for 14 days before they are driven up to alpine pastures, or their milk can be classed as ‘haymilk’ only once they have spent 14 days on alpine pastures (owned by the haymilk supplier). No silage may be produced or used as feed on the alpine pasture.

Prohibition of genetically modified food and feed

| — | In order to preserve the traditional production of haymilk, no animals or feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation may be used. |
| --- | --- |

—

In order to preserve the traditional production of haymilk, no animals or feed which are to be identified as ‘genetically modified’ under prevailing legislation may be used.

Other regulations

| — | No silage (fermented fodder) may be produced on any of the areas exploited by haymilk producers. |
| --- | --- |

—

No silage (fermented fodder) may be produced on any of the areas exploited by haymilk producers.

| — | No film-wrapped round bales of any type may be produced or stored. |
| --- | --- |

—

No film-wrapped round bales of any type may be produced or stored.

| — | No moist hay or fermented hay may be produced on any of the areas exploited by haymilk producers. |
| --- | --- |

—

No moist hay or fermented hay may be produced on any of the areas exploited by haymilk producers.

3.7.   Specific character of the agricultural product or foodstuff

Haymilk is different from standard cow’s milk on account of its special production conditions pursuant to point 3.6 of the ‘Heumilchregulativ’.

Studies by Dr Ginzinger et al. of the Bundesanstalt für alpenländische Milchwirtschaft (Federal Agency for alpine dairy farming) in Rotholz, in 1995 and 2001, showed that 65 % of the silage-milk samples analysed had over 1 000 clostridia spores per litre. Analysis of milk delivered to a large cheese manufacturer showed that 52 % of the samples had over 10 000 clostridia spores per litre. Studies showed that 85 % of the silage-free haymilk samples analysed had less than 200 spores per litre, and 15 % of the samples contained between 200 and 300 spores per litre. Haymilk has a particularly low level of clostridia spores on account of special feeding methods. When hard cheese is manufactured from raw haymilk, there are fewer major problems regarding holes and flavour.

As part of the research project on ‘the influence of silage on milk quality’, the taste of milk from animals that had and had not been fed on silage was analysed (Ginzinger and Tschager, Bundesanstalt für alpenländische Milchwirtschaft, Rotholz, 1993). 77 % of the examined milk samples from hay-fed animals did not have taste problems. As regards milk samples from silage-fed animals (standard milk), only 29 % of the sampled milk was free from taste problems. There was also a significant difference between tests on milk from delivery lorry tanks. 94 % of the tests on silage-free haymilk had no taste problems. However, the proportion of silage-milk samples free from taste problems was only 45 %.

A thesis study at the University of Vienna (by Schreiner, Seiz and Ginzinger, 2011) proved that haymilk has approximately double the content of Omega 3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids when compared to standard milk, on account of the feeding based on roughage and pasture associated with that form of milk.

3.8.   Traditional character of the agricultural product or foodstuff

Haymilk production and processing is as old as the tradition of dairy farming (dating back to around the fifth century BCE). In the Middle Ages, in the foothills of the Alps and the Tyrolean mountains, cheese was already being produced from haymilk on ‘Schwaighöfen’ (small-scale Alpine dairy farms). The word ‘Schwaig’ comes from Middle High German and denotes a special form of settlement and, in particular, farming in the Alpine region. ‘Schwaighof’ farms were often established as permanent settlements by landowners and their cattle stock was primarily used for dairy farming (particularly for cheese production). They have existed in the Tyrol and Salzburg since the 12th century. In the mountainous areas, haymilk was originally linked to the production of hard cheese from raw milk. As early as around 1900, laws (milk regulations) were already passed regarding silage-free milk suitable for the production of hard cheese. In Austria, such laws formed the basis of the ‘Milchregulative’ (milk regulations) of the provinces of Vorarlberg, the Tyrol and Salzburg around 1950. In 1975 these ‘Milchregulative’ were streamlined and defined as the prerequisites for milk suitable for the production of hard cheese by the Austrian dairy farming body (see: ‘Bestimmungen über die Übernahme von hartkäsetauglicher Milch’ (rules on milk suitable for producing hard cheese), Österreichische Milchwirtschaft Heft 14, Beilage 6 Nr. 23c, 21 July 1975). The former dairy farming authority in Austria regulated certain production areas known as ‘silage-free zones’ up until 1993, in order to preserve the raw material ‘haymilk’ (also known as ‘silage-free milk’ and ‘milk suitable for the production of hard cheese’) for cheese manufacturers reliant on raw milk. In 1995, the silage-free zone for haymilk was further protected by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Water and Environment Management in its ‘non-use of silage measure’, contained in the ‘special guidelines to promote an environmentally friendly, extensive form of agriculture that protects natural living space’ (the Austrian programme for environmentally friendly agriculture, known as ‘ÖPUL’).

In alpine regions animals have always traditionally been fed according to the haymilk criteria. There are documents and certificates dating from 1544 charting alpine cheese production for the Wildschönauer Holzalm alpine pasture in the Tyrol.

Since the start of the 1980s, some haymilk farmers have also been farming according to organic/ecological criteria.

3.9.   Minimum requirements and procedures to check the specific character

—

4.   Authorities or bodies verifying compliance with the product specification

4.1.   Name and address

—

4.2.   Specific tasks of the authority or body

—

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1. Replaced by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.

---