alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(h)
 GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay Equitable Life
Insurance Company of Iowa corporation, the sum of $60 million
($60,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.25%  per annum from the
date hereof, December 30, 1998 until paid.  In any event, this note
will mature on December 29, 2028.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate to
payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as well
as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note
holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in the event of (a)
the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance
Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other
Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance
Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of the
final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By: /s/ Stephen J. Preston
                                   --------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Preston, Executive
                                         Vice President


Attest by:


/s/ David L. Jacobson
-------------------------
David L. Jacobson
Senior Vice President and
    Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>
42325.

#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CLARK.

Argued September 7, 1966

Decided September 23, 1966.

*Sam J. Welsch,*for appellant.

*Cullen M. Ward,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court overruling certain objections of the defendant to interrogatories filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff-appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final and appealable judgment under the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18). *Held:*

While orders denying or requiring answers to interrogatories are reviewable on appeal after final judgment if they have affected the final judgment and are not moot *(Benefield v. Malone,*1101 Ga. App. 607 (2a) (139 SE2d 500)), an order sustaining or overruling objections to interrogatories is merely interlocutory *(Fricks v. Cole,*109 Ga. App. 143, 147 (135 SE2d 512)), and not being a final judgment or one which would have been final if rendered' as contended for by the appellant, such order is not an appealable judgment under Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; *Code Ann.*§ 6-701). *Millholland v. Oglesby,*114 Ga. App. 745. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction of this case, and the appeal must be dismissed as authorized by Section 13 (b) of the Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, as amended; *Code Ann.*§ 6-809).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., conciur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793631
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XV LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         125,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,074
<PP&E>                                       6,660,450
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,210,571)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,574,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,264,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,574,953
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               482,653
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            287,762
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   287,762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    38.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    38.83
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000898904                 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         73,382
<SECURITIES>                                      0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,274
<INVENTORY>                                    13,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,293
<PP&E>                                         433,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,654
<BONDS>                                            0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                        38,341
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,287
<SALES>                                        750,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               750,851
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  786,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (39,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12,907)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.31)
        


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,053
<SECURITIES>                                    96,143
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,729)
<INVENTORY>                                     52,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,457
<PP&E>                                          28,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,293
<SALES>                                        266,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,858
<CGS>                                          137,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1101.1 Scope and purpose.

This part implements the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, with respect to the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (Council), and establishes related information disclosure procedures.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed September 13, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0008

Lower Tribunal No. 21-25124

________________

Brenda Serrano,

Appellant,

vs.

Jeffrey Epstein,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. 

Manno Schurr, Judge.

Andrew M. Kassier, P.A., and Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant.

Law Offices of Kurt R. Klaus, Jr., and Kurt R. Klaus, Jr., for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff below, Brenda Serrano, individually and on behalf of her 
2

minor son (“Serrano”), appeals from the final summary judgment entered in 

favor of defendant Jeffrey Epstein (“Epstein”). We affirm, in part, and 

reverse, in part.

Serrano filed a complaint against several defendants, including 

Epstein and Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase Bank”). Epstein moved for 

summary judgment as to the counts alleged by Serrano against him based 

on his affirmative defenses. Chase Bank did not move for summary 

judgment. At the conclusion of the hearing on Epstein’s motion for 

summary judgment, at which Chase Bank was not present, the trial court

granted Epstein’s motion for summary judgment, and stated that it was 

entering a final summary judgment as to all counts alleged by Serrano, 

which would include the counts Serrano alleged against nonmovant Chase 

Bank. Thereafter, the trial court entered the final summary judgment under 

review. 

Without further discussion, we affirm the portion of the final summary 

judgment entered as to the claims asserted by Serrano against Epstein, as 

the issues raised by Serrano as to those claims lack merit. However, we 

reverse the entry of final summary judgment relating to Serrano’s claims 

alleged against defendant Chase Bank because Chase Bank did not move 

for summary judgment, and Serrano was not provided with notice and with 
3

an opportunity to respond and prepare for the hearing as to her claims 

asserted against Chase Bank. See Ness Racquet Club, LLC, v. Ocean

Four 2108, LLC, 88 So. 3d 200, 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“Where a party 

has not filed a summary judgment motion or where no notice or opportunity 

to be heard has been given to the opposing side to present opposing 

affidavits, a trial court may not sua sponte grant summary judgment in favor 

of the non-movant.”); Hotel 71 Mezz Lender, LLC v. Tutt, 66 So. 3d 1051,

1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (reversing summary judgment in favor of 

nonmoving party where opposing party was not given an opportunity to 

respond and prepare for hearing). Accordingly, we affirm, in part, and 

reverse, in part, the final summary judgment entered against Serrano. 

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10(z)


January 9, 1997


Mr. Jamie W. Ellertson
2270 Silver Sands Court
Vero Beach, FL 32963

RE: Offer Letter

Dear Jamie:

We are delighted to welcome you to Interleaf, beginning January 27, 1997.

You will be joining the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer. You
will also be nominated to be a member of the Company's Board of Directors. You
will receive a base annual salary of $300,000, payable bi-weekly. You will also
be eligible to receive an additional $75,000 upon the Company achieving certain
revenue and cash objectives consistent with the Company's executive bonus
program. Your first annual "on target earnings" ("OTE") shall therefore be
$375,000. You will be eligible to receive all other benefits (medical, dental,
401(k), and life insurance) that are provided to Interleaf executives. 

As an additional inducement, you will be awarded, pursuant to the Company's 
Stock Option Plan, options to purchase 725,000 shares, vesting equally over a 4
year period of time, priced at the Company's closing price on Friday, January
10, 1997. In the event, however, that the Company's Board accepts a definitive
agreement that results in the Company being acquired, the following vesting
schedule shall apply, from the date of this agreement:

               0 - 3 months                    25% vesting
               4 - 12 months                   50% vesting
               13- 24 months                   75% vesting
               24+ months                      100%

Your compensation package, including option grants, shall be reviewed annually
as part of our standard practice.

If you are terminated "not for cause," you will receive one (1) year's base
salary, paid bi-weekly.

We will provide you with relocation assistance up to $40,000.

By signing below, you agree to the terms contained in this letter and agree to
join us on January 27, 1997.

Once again, welcome to Interleaf.

Very truly yours,



/s/Clinton P. Harris
--------------------
Clinton P. Harris
Chairman, Compensation Committee

Accepted:


/s/ Jaime W. Ellertson         
----------------------
Jamie W. Ellertson     1/9/97
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2209
In re: PHILIP JAY FETNER , Debtor ,

------------------------------------- PHILIP JAY FETNER , Debtor

- Appellant ,

v.
KEVIN R. MCCARTHY , Trustee

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00316

- AJT

- MSN )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Philip Jay Fetner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P E R CURIAM: Philip Jay Fetner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his bankruptcy appeal and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fetner v. Hotel St. Cap. , L

. L

. C

. , No. 1:20

- cv - 00316

- AJT

- MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2020 & Oct. 7, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 1264
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1264 appear at 78 FR 2324, Jan. 11, 2013.

§ 1264.5 Housing associate application process. ( a ) *Authority.* The Banks are authorized to approve or deny all applications for certification as a housing associate, subject to the requirements of the Bank Act and this part. A Bank may delegate the authority to approve applications for certification as a housing associate only to a committee of the Bank's board of directors, the Bank president, or a senior officer who reports directly to the Bank president other than an officer with responsibility for business development.
( b ) *Application requirements.* An applicant for certification as a housing associate shall submit an application that satisfies the requirements of the Bank Act and this part to the Bank of the district in which the applicant's principal place of business, as determined in accordance with part 925 of this title, is located.
( c ) *Bank decision process* — ( 1 ) *Action on applications.* A Bank shall approve or deny an application for certification as a housing associate within 60 calendar days of the date the Bank deems the application to be complete. A Bank shall deem an application complete, and so notify the applicant in writing, when it has obtained all of the information required by this part and any other information it deems necessary to process the application. If a Bank determines during the review process that additional information is necessary to process the application, the Bank may deem the application incomplete and stop the 60-day time period by providing written notice to the applicant. When the Bank receives the additional information, it shall again deem the application complete, so notify the applicant in writing, and resume the 60-day time period where it stopped.
( 2 ) *Decision on applications.* The Bank or a duly delegated committee of the Bank's board of directors, the Bank president, or a senior officer who reports directly to the Bank president other than an officer with responsibility for business development shall approve, or the board of directors of a Bank shall deny, each application for certification as a housing associate by a written decision resolution stating the grounds for the decision. Within three business days of a Bank's decision on an application, the Bank shall provide the applicant and the FHFA with a copy of the Bank's decision resolution.
( 3 ) *File.* The Bank shall maintain a certification file for each applicant for at least three years after the date the Bank decides whether to approve or deny certification or the date the FHFA resolves any appeal, whichever is later. At a minimum, the certification file shall include all documents submitted by the applicant or otherwise obtained or generated by the Bank concerning the applicant, all documents the Bank relied upon in making its determination regarding certification, including copies of statutes and regulations, and the decision resolution.
[65 FR 44426, July 18, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 9510, Feb. 28, 2005; 75 FR 8240, Feb. 24, 2010]
§ 150.340 May I exercise rights to purchase additional stock or fractional shares of my stock or obligations or the stock or obligations of my affiliates? If the retention of investments in your stock or obligations or the stock or obligations of an affiliate in fiduciary accounts is consistent with applicable law, you may do either of the following: ( a ) Exercise rights to purchase additional stock (or securities convertible into additional stock) when these rights are offered *pro rata* to stockholders.
( b ) Purchase fractional shares to complement fractional shares acquired through the exercise of rights or through the receipt of a stock dividend resulting in fractional share holdings.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Romania Signs the Artemis Accords

# 									Romania Signs the Artemis Accords							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 1, 2022

At a virtual ceremony, Romania became the 16th nation to sign the Artemis Accords. President and CEO of the Romanian Space Agency Marius-Ioan Piso signed the Accords on behalf of Romania. His actions were witnessed and welcomed by NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, U.S. Embassy in Romania Chargé d’affaires, a.i. David Muniz, and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Jennifer R. Littlejohn.

The Artemis Accords are a set of nonbinding commitments, grounded in the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, to facilitate the peaceful and safe exploration of outer space.  The Artemis Accords lay out certain principles to guide civil space actors, among them: peaceful purposes, transparency, interoperability, commitment to emergency assistance, registration of space objects, release of scientific data, deconfliction of activities, protection of space heritage, and mitigation of orbital debris, including spacecraft disposal.

The other signatories of the Artemis Accords are Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and the United States.

For more information, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Artemis AccordsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRomaniaSpace

Back to Top