alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment to the Processing Production Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PROCESSING
PRODUCTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to the
Processing Production Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of the 8th day of August, 2003, by and
between Aurora Foods Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”), and Olmarc Packaging Co., an Illinois corporation (“Producer”). 
  
 WITNESSETH 
  
 WHEREAS, Buyer and Producer entered into that certain Processing Production Agreement dated as of December 23, 1998 (the “Agreement”);

  
 WHEREAS, both parties desire to amend the Agreement.

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual and adequate consideration,
Producer and Buyer agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended so that the Original Term shall end December 23, 2004. 

  

	2.	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorized
representative to be effective as of the date first set forth above. 
  

	 AURORA FOODS INC.
 (“Buyer”)
	 	 	 	 OLMARC PACKAGING CO.
 (“Producer”)

					
	By:	 	 /s/    Steve Smiley        
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    Ken Marchetti        

	 	
	 	 	 	 	

	 Print Name:
	 	 Steve Smiley
	 	 	 	 Print Name:
	 	 Ken Marchetti

	 Title:
	 	 V.P. Purchasing
	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	 C.E.O.
#### § 19.101 Delegation to OFIA.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Comptroller, an ALJ assigned to OFIA conducts administrative adjudications subject to subpart A of this part.
No. 04-14-00906

- CV

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

at SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

DAVID MAUK

Appellant

v.

Appellees

PIPE CREEK WATER WELL, LLC and ROBERT RAE POWELL

Cause No. 2013- CI -00386; Appeal from the 408 th Judicial District Court,

Bexar County, Texas

APPELL EES’ AMENDED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT APPEALS

COURT:

NOW COME, Appellees, ROBERT RAE POWELL and PIPE CREEK WATER WELL,

LLC, and file this Motion to Extend Time to File Brief and will show as follows:

1. Appellees ’ brief is presently due on February 19, 201 5

.

2. An extension for approximately seven (7 ) days is requested making Apellees’ brief

due on February 26, 2015

.

3. Counsel for Appellees have numerous settings and other matters which preclude

diligence in researching and briefing the issues presented herein.

4. This extension is not sought solely for delay, but that justice may be done.

5. Counsel for Appellant does not have an objection to this extension. ACCEPTED

04-14-00906-cv

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

2/17/2015 11:38:06 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERKPRAYER

THEREFORE, Appellees, ROBERT RAE POWELL and PIPE CREEK WATER WELL,

LLC pray that this motion be filed, that an extension of time be granted, and that they have such

other relief, in law or equity, to which they may be justly e ntitled.

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Keith P. Miller, PC

14350 Northbrook, Suite 150

San Antonio, Texas 78232

Tel: (210) 524

- 9040

Fax: (210) 267

- 2982

/S/ Megan H. Kucera

By:

KEITH P. MILLER

State Bar No. 14093725

MEGAN H. KUCERA

State Bar No. 24076449CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify by my signature below that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has

been served by:

___ Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested

___ First Class Mail

_ X _ Telecopier and/or

___ Hand

- delivery

___ EService

To the following:

William M. McKamie

Adolfo Ruiz

McKamie Kruger, LLP

941 Proton Road

San Antonio, Texas 78258

Telecopier: (210) 546

- 2130

adolfo@mckamiekrueger.com

On the 1 7 th day of February, 2015

.

/s/ Megan Kucera

________________________________ Megan H. Kucera
# C_2022304EN.01000401.xml

| 9.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 August 2022

(2022/C 304/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0199 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3650 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9763 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,515 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 394,27 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7043 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9163 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3175 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4607 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3134 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,0061 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6202 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4058 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9694 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8931 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5123 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 147,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5477 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,554 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,380 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2380 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6810 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1660 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0199

JPY

Japanese yen

137,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84165

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3650

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9763

ISK

Iceland króna

140,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,515

HUF

Hungarian forint

394,27

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7043

RON

Romanian leu

4,9163

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3175

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4607

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3134

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,0061

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6202

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4058

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,93

ZAR

South African rand

16,9694

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8931

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5123

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 147,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5477

PHP

Philippine peso

56,554

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,380

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2380

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6810

INR

Indian rupee

81,1660

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR VLADIMIR GUZMANQUINTANILLA; et al., 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73780 

Agency Nos. A206-773-832 

A206-773-833 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. 

Cesar Vladimir Guzman-Quintanilla and his minor sister, natives and 

citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision 

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73780 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye 

v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioners

failed to establish the harm they fear would be on account of a protected ground. 

See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (an applicant “must provide 

some evidence of [motive], direct or circumstantial”); see also Zetino v. Holder, 

622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from 

harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members 

bears no nexus to a protected ground”).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

petitioners failed to show it is more likely than not they will be tortured by or with 

the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as unsupported by the record petitioners’ contentions that the BIA 

violated their due process rights by using its streamlining procedures or by failing 

to explain its reasoning. 

1 Petitioners each filed their own applications for relief.
3 15-73780 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7689

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT G. WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-89-113-R, CA-98-649-R)

Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert G. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-89-

113-R; CA-98-649-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2022123EN.01004101.xml

| 18.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/41

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 March 2022

(2022/C 123/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1051 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0385 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,777 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 372,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6889 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9465 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 16,3123 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5055 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3998 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6391 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6130 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4980 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 340,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5286 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0176 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5730 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 835,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6364 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,690 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,767 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6339 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,7880 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,8435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1051

JPY

Japanese yen

131,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84315

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0385

ISK

Iceland króna

142,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,777

HUF

Hungarian forint

372,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6889

RON

Romanian leu

4,9465

TRY

Turkish lira

16,3123

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5055

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3998

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6391

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6130

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4980

KRW

South Korean won

1 340,02

ZAR

South African rand

16,5286

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0176

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5730

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 835,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6364

PHP

Philippine peso

57,690

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,767

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6339

MXN

Mexican peso

22,7880

INR

Indian rupee

83,8435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0000793981 
<NAME> WEALTH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    36656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      33438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 79405
<PP&E>                                          643740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  102502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  633660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1973119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13644
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1363005)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    633660
<SALES>                                        2168965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2168965
<CGS>                                           586622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   586622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2599623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1017280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1017280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1017280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 12, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue Committee will be held Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 1, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-24110 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 07, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 07, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0155. MCM VENTURES, LLC v. AMERIS BANK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCV2019001331 SUCV2019001334 SUCV2019001333 SUCV2019001335
# C_2021391EN.01000101.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 391/01)

Last publication

OJ C 382, 20.9.2021

Past publications

OJ C 368, 13.9.2021

OJ C 357, 6.9.2021

OJ C 349, 30.8.2021

OJ C 338, 23.8.2021

OJ C 329, 16.8.2021

OJ C 320, 9.8.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
H. R. 274

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the property in Cecil County,

Maryland, known as Garrett Island for inclusion in the Blackwater National

Wildlife Refuge.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blackwater National Wildlife

Refuge Expansion Act’’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) Garrett Island, located at the mouth of the Susquehanna

River in Cecil County, Maryland, is a microcosm of the geology

and geography of the region, including hard rock piedmont,

coastal plain, and volcanic formations.

(2) Garrett Island is the only rocky island in the tidal

waters of the Chesapeake.

(3) Garrett Island and adjacent waters provide high-quality

habitat for bird and fish species.

(4) Garrett Island contains significant archaeological sites

reflecting human history and prehistory of the region.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR INCLUSION IN THE

BLACKWATER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

(a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Interior may use otherwise available amounts to acquire the area known as Garrett Island,

consisting of approximately 198 acres located at the mouth of the

Susquehanna River in Cecil County, Maryland.

(b) ADMINISTRATION.—Lands and interests acquired by the

United States under this section shall be managed by the Secretary

as the Garrett Island Unit of the Blackwater National Wildlife

Refuge.

(c) PURPOSES.—The purposes for which the Garrett Island Unit

is established and shall be managed are the following:

(1) To support the Delmarva Conservation Corridor Demonstration Program.

(2) To conserve, restore, and manage habitats as necessary

to contribute to the migratory bird populations prevalent in

the Atlantic Flyway.

(3) To conserve, restore, and manage the significant aquatic

resource values associated with submerged land adjacent to

the unit and to achieve the habitat objectives of the agreement

known as the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement.
H. R. 274—2

(4) To conserve the archaeological resources on the unit.

(5) To provide public access to the unit in a manner that

does not adversely impact natural resources on and around

the unit.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2022418EN.01000101.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 418/01)

Last publication

OJ C 408, 24.10.2022

Past publications

OJ C 398, 17.10.2022

OJ C 389, 10.10.2022

OJ C 380, 3.10.2022

OJ C 368, 26.9.2022

OJ C 359, 19.9.2022

OJ C 340, 5.9.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 128.5 Equal Housing Lender Poster. ( a ) Each savings association shall post and maintain one or more Equal Housing Lender Posters, the text of which is prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, in the lobby of each of its offices in a prominent place or places readily apparent to all persons seeking loans. The poster shall be at least 11 by 14 inches in size, and the text shall be easily legible. It is recommended that savings associations post a Spanish language version of the poster in offices serving areas with a substantial Spanish-speaking population.
( b ) The text of the Equal Housing Lender Poster shall be as follows:
We Do Business In Accordance With Federal Fair Lending Laws. UNDER THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING ACT, IT IS ILLEGAL, ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, OR FAMILIAL STATUS (HAVING CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 18) TO: [ ] Deny a loan for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing or maintaining a dwelling or to deny any loan secured by a dwelling; or [ ] Discriminate in fixing the amount, interest rate, duration, application procedures, or other terms or conditions of such a loan or in appraising property. IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, YOU SHOULD: SEND A COMPLAINT TO: Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410. For processing under the Federal Fair Housing Act AND TO: [Insert contact information for appropriate Federal regulator] For processing under applicable Regulations. UNDER THE EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT, IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE IN ANY CREDIT TRANSACTION: [ ] On the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or age; [ ] Because income is from public assistance; or [ ] Because a right has been exercised under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, YOU SHOULD SEND A COMPLAINT TO: [Insert contact information for appropriate Federal regulator]
Charge Questions

AEATF Liquid Pour Completed Study (AEA05) 

Study Title: “A Study for Measurement of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Exposure 

during Manual Pouring of a Liquid Containing an Antimicrobial” 

1. Was the research reported in the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II 

(AEATF) completed liquid pour study report (AEA05) faithful to the design and objectives 

of the protocol and governing documents of AEATF? 

2. Has EPA adequately characterized, from a scientific perspective, the limitations on these data 

that should be considered when using the data in estimating the exposure of people who pour 

liquid antimicrobial pesticide products? 

3. Does available information support a determination that the study was conducted in 

substantial compliance with subparts K and L of 40 CFR Part 26?