alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Corn *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 22,036.

Filed February 15, 1912.]

Criminal *Law.—Trial.—Instruction.—Obscivre Definition of Reasonable Doubt.—Failure to Request Broader*Instruction.—A judgment of conviction will not be reversed merely because the court’s instruction on reasonable doubt was incomplete and obscure, where defendant failed to request a more complete, exact and broader instruction on the subject

From Newton Circuit Court; *Charles W. Hanley,*Judge.

Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Joseph Corn. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*T. B. Cunningham,*for appellant.

*Thomas M. Honan,*Attorney-General, *Thomas H. Branaman, Edwin Corr,*and *James E. McCullough,*for the State.

Cox, J.—

The appellant was indicted for the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed upon the person of a girl thirteen years of age, was tried by a jury and found guilty. Being forty years of age, he was given an indeterminate sentence of from two to twenty-one years in the State Prison. From that sentence he appeals, and assigns for error the action of the trial court in overruling his motion for a new trial.

The only proposition or point stated in appellant’s brief relates to instruction four, given by the court, which involves a definition of reasonable doubt, and which was merely incomplete and obscure. If appellant was not satisfied with the instruction as given, and desired a more complete, exact and broader instruction on the subject, he should have tendered one and requested the court to give it; and if the court refused to do so, and it appeared that appellant was harmed thereby, he would then have ground for a reversal. *Sullivan*v. *State*(1876), 52 Ind. 309; *Colee*v. *State*(1881), *15975 Ind. 511; *Heyl*v. *State*(1887), 109 Ind. 589, 10 N. E. 916; *Harris*v. *State*(1900), 155 Ind. 265, 58 N. E. 75.

Furthermore, an examination of the evidence convinces that appellant was in no event harmed by the instruction in question. The crime was a most revolting and shocking one, and there was direct and positive evidence that appellant committed it. There was no testimony given in his behalf which had more than the slightest tendency to show the contrary, except his own denial, and his own testimony disclosed an immoral, shameless and degraded character.

The judgment is affirmed.

Note.—Reported in 97 N. E. 421. See, also, 12 Cyc. C60 and 97 Am. Dec. 118.
#### § 19.230 Scope.

This subpart applies to informal hearings afforded to any director or senior executive officer dismissed pursuant to an order issued under section 38 of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1831o) and 12 CFR part 6 (prompt corrective action). For purposes of this subpart, *insured depository institution* means an insured national bank, an insured Federal savings association, an insured Federal savings bank, or an insured Federal branch of a foreign bank.
Kiakakrorak

R iver 

K o gosukruk R iv er 

Fish

Creek 

Judy

C re e

k 

Tu n alik

River 

To p ag oruk 

Inaru River 

Kuk 

Riv er 

Co l v il e 

Ikpikpuk 

River 

Meade 

Col v i ll e 

Meade River 

River 

River 

Ri v e r 

R i v e r 

Maybe Creek 

Titaluk River 

Atigaru Point 

Harrison

Bay 

Be a uf ort S ea 

Dease Inlet 

Peard ay 

Ch uk c hi S e a 

Kasegaluk 

Lagoon 

Cape

Pit

mpson 

B

A R C T I C O C E A N 

Point Barrow

Barrow 

Point Belcher 

Walakpa Bay Tangent Point 

Cape Si Point Franklin 

t Point

Admiralt Smith Bay Bayy 

Halkett

Wainwright 

Teshekpuk Lake

Icy Cape Atqasuk

Nuiqsut 

Point Lay 

ATQASUK SUBSISTENCE USE AREAS Umiat 

Bird Harvest Area 

Fish Harvest Area 

Moose Harvest Area 

Caribou Harvest Area 

Native Corporations Surface Ownership 

0 6 12 18

Miles 

Source: Pederson 1979

Map3-40. Atqasuk Subsistence Use Areas for Caribou, Moose, Fish, and Birds in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska 

l
§ 21.3305 “Interrupted” status. ( a ) *Special restorative training should be uninterrupted.* An eligible person once entered into special restorative training should pursue his or her course to completion without interruption. Wherever possible, continuous training shall be provided for each eligible person, including training during the summer, except where, because of his or her physical condition or other good reason, it would not be to his or her best interest to pursue training. As long as the eligible person is progressing satisfactorily toward overcoming the effects of his or her disability(ies), the eligible person will be continued in his or her course of training without accounting for days of nonattendance within the authorized enrollment. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3541)
( b ) *Interrupting special restorative training.* Special restorative training will be interrupted as necessary under the following conditions: ( 1 ) During summer vacations or periods when no instruction is given before and after summer sessions.
( 2 ) During a prolonged period of illness or medical infeasibility.
( 3 ) When the eligible person voluntarily abandons special restorative training.
( 4 ) When the eligible person fails to make satisfactory progress in the special restorative training course.
( 5 ) When the eligible person is no longer acceptable to the institution because of failure to maintain satisfactory conduct or progress in accordance with the rules of the institution.
( 6 ) When the eligible person's progress is materially retarded because of his or her negligence, lack of application or misconduct.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3541, 3543(b))
[48 FR 37973, Aug. 22, 1983, as amended at 73 FR 2425, Jan. 15, 2008]
# C_2022359EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 359/01)

Last publication

OJ C 340, 5.9.2022

Past publications

OJ C 326, 29.8.2022

OJ C 318, 22.8.2022

OJ C 311, 16.8.2022

OJ C 303, 8.8.2022

OJ C 294, 1.8.2022

OJ C 284, 25.7.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
RPAI-2015-3.31-EX 10.2




Exhibit 10.2


RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC.
AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Retention Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between Angela M. Aman (“Executive”) and Retail Properties of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), effective as of February 19, 2015.
RECITALS
A.On February 19, 2013, Executive and Company entered into that certain Retention Agreement (the “Retention Agreement”) by and between Executive and Company providing inter alia for certain payments to Executive in the event of the termination of Executive’s employment.
B.The structure of the Company’s bonus program has changed since the date of the execution of the Retention Agreement, and the Company and Executive desire to amend the Retention Agreement to reflect the changes in such structure.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Amendment of Retention Agreement.  Section 3(a) of the Retention Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
(a)    Cash Severance (Non-Change in Control).  Executive shall receive on the sixtieth (60th) day following the Termination Date a lump sum cash amount (less applicable withholdings) equal to the sum of (i) twelve (12) months of Executive’s base salary at the rate then in effect (without giving effect to any reduction in the base salary rate amounting to Good Reason), (ii) an amount equal to 100% of the dollar amount of the Executive’s annual bonus (including 100% of the target cash and equity components), calculated based on the annual bonus for the year in which Executive’s employment was terminated (or the prior year if a target annual bonus (both cash and equity) award amount hadn’t yet been established for such year) that would be paid (or granted) to Executive if Executive’s employment had not terminated and if all performance-based milestones were achieved at 100% of the target level by both the Company and Executive (the “Target Bonus”), and (iii) all annual bonus amounts earned during the year in which the termination occurs through the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the termination date but otherwise remaining unpaid as of the Termination Date.
2.Conflicts.  In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Retention Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall supersede and control.  In all other respects, the Retention Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.
Retail Properties of America, Inc.




	
					
	By:
	/s/ Steven P. Grimes
	 
	Date:
	2/19/15

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Executive
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Angela M. Aman
	 
	Date:
	2/19/15

	 
	Angela M. Aman
§ 1260.3 Requests to withhold proprietary information. ( a ) *General.* A Bank may request in writing that FHFA withhold from distribution, or determine that the Bank may withhold from distribution, particular information relating to the Bank that may otherwise be subject to distribution under § 1260.2 on the basis that it is proprietary information and the public interest requires that it not be shared. Any such request shall identify the particular information the Bank believes should not be distributed and provide support for the assertions that it is proprietary information and that withholding it from the other Banks and the Office of Finance is necessary to protect the public interest.
( b ) *Timing of requests.* ( 1 ) *General.* Unless otherwise specified as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the period within which a Bank may make a request to withhold proprietary information under paragraph (a) of this section shall be as follows: ( i ) For information that a Bank submits to FHFA, the request shall be delivered to FHFA no later than the time at which the Bank submits the subject information to FHFA.
( ii ) For information that FHFA creates (not including compilations of data submitted by the Banks), prior to distributing any information relating to a particular Bank, FHFA shall provide that Bank with a copy of the information to be distributed, after which the Bank shall have ten (10) business days within which to deliver the request to FHFA.
( iii ) For information that a Bank is required to distribute directly to the other Banks and the Office of Finance, the request shall be delivered to FHFA no later than ten (10) business days prior to the date on which the Bank would otherwise be required to distribute the information.
( 2 ) *As otherwise specified by FHFA.* Any notice issued by FHFA under § 1260.2(b) may establish requirements for the timing of requests to withhold proprietary information that are different from those specified under paragraph (b)(1) of this section for any category of information to be distributed thereunder. In establishing such requirements, FHFA shall give due regard to the volume and complexity of the information to be reviewed, the Bank's existing familiarity with the information, the frequency of submission or distribution of the information, the likelihood that the information will contain proprietary information, and the effect that any delay in the distribution of the information would have on the fulfillment of the purposes of section 20A(a) of the Bank Act.
( c ) *Determination and notice by FHFA.* After receiving a written request that meets the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the Director or his designee shall promptly determine whether FHFA will, or the Bank may, withhold any information from distribution pursuant to the request, which determination shall be final. FHFA shall promptly notify the affected Bank of that determination and shall not distribute any information that is the subject of the request until it has provided the required notice to the Bank.
# C_2022218EN.01000501.xml

| 2.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 June 2022

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 June 2022

(2022/C 218/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0712 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85158 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4758 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0305 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0438 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,748 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 395,03 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5913 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9428 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,6223 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4861 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3536 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4057 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6442 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4700 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6090 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1586 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5345 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 574,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6951 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,182 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,801 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0646 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0678 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,0510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0712

JPY

Japanese yen

138,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85158

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4758

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0305

ISK

Iceland króna

137,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0438

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,748

HUF

Hungarian forint

395,03

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5913

RON

Romanian leu

4,9428

TRY

Turkish lira

17,6223

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4861

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3536

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4057

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6442

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4700

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,44

ZAR

South African rand

16,6090

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1586

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5345

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 574,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6951

PHP

Philippine peso

56,182

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,801

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0646

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0678

INR

Indian rupee

83,0510

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting

# 									Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Bayerischer Hof

Munich, Germany

February 17, 2024

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Well, good afternoon, everyone, Mr. President.  I very much appreciate this opportunity to spend time with President Aliyev.  We’ve had many opportunities over the last few years to speak and to meet.  I think this is an important time – important in Azerbaijan taking on the leadership of COP, something we strongly support and we look forward to doing everything we can to make that successful; but also in pursuing a durable and dignified peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, an area where the United States has worked to be helpful and will continue to do so, as requested.

There’s lots to talk about.  Mr. President, thank you so much for spending the time today.

**PRESIDENT ALIYEV:**Thank you, Mr. Secretary.  And as the Secretary mentioned, the COP29 is an important part of our bilateral agenda, or it expands, actually, topics on our agenda, and we count on the support from your government in all our initiatives during this year.  And as Mr. Secretary mentioned, we have also one issue on our agenda, which is the regional situation in the Caucasus, particularly prospects for a peace settlement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.  Azerbaijan is committed to peace, and reaching a peace agreement as soon as possible is in our national interest.  I’m very grateful to the United States, and personally to the Secretary for his efforts in this direction.

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Thanks, everyone.

Tags

AzerbaijanBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate ChangeGermanyOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsPeaceSecretary TripThe Secretary of StateTravel

Back to Top
<PAGE>
                                                 EXHIBIT 10(i)

               GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay First Columbine
Life Insurance Company a Colorado corporation, the sum of $35 million
($35,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.979% per annum from
the date hereof, December 8, 1999 until paid.  In any event, this
note will mature on December 7, 2029.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate
to payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as
well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than
surplus note holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in
the event of (a) the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization,
insolvency or liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American
Life Insurance Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver
or other Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life
Insurance Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of
the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.

                              GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                              By: /s/ David L. Jacobson
                                  --------------------------------
                                  David L. Jacobson, Senior Vice
                                  President and Assistant Secretary


Attest by:

/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and Secretary

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FOR NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000793500
<NAME> NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,168)
<INVENTORY>                                     26,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,042
<PP&E>                                          44,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,512
<BONDS>                                         15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,644
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,632
<SALES>                                        235,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,139
<CGS>                                          157,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,965
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2415

MCELROY COAL COMPANY; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,

Petitioners,

v.

MIKEL C. TRADER; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(12-0658-BLA)

Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 11, 2014

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West 

Virginia, for Petitioners. Heath M. Long, PAWLOWSKI, BILONICK & 

LONG, Ebensburg, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Gary K. 

Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., 

for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

McElroy Coal Company and Consolidation Coal Company 

petition for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and 

order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black 

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our 

review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses 

that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and 

is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition 

for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal 

Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED