alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2649 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2649

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
                        Adjustment Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Hodges Surface Water 
Improvement and Reclamation Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 16__ the following:

``SEC. 16__. LAKE HODGES SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT AND RECLAMATION 
              PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Olivenhain Municipal Water District, California, is authorized to 
participate in the design, planning, and construction of projects to 
treat, reclaim, and reuse impaired surface water from Lakes Hodges in 
San Diego County, California.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the projects 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation or maintenance of a project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 163__ the 
following:

``Sec. 163__. Lake Hodges surface water improvement and reclamation 
                            project.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2649

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
                        Adjustment Act of 1992.
```
# C_2021351EN.01002301.xml

| 1.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/23

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 August 2021

(2021/C 351/10)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1834 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85875 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0799 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,523 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 348,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5296 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9359 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,8310 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6156 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4896 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2086 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6760 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5897 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 370,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2282 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6465 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4900 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 879,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9194 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,765 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,7600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,129 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1386 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,7864 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,3850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1834

JPY

Japanese yen

129,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85875

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1625

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0799

ISK

Iceland króna

149,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,523

HUF

Hungarian forint

348,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5296

RON

Romanian leu

4,9359

TRY

Turkish lira

9,8310

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6156

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4896

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2086

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6760

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5897

KRW

South Korean won

1 370,03

ZAR

South African rand

17,2282

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6465

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4900

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 879,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9194

PHP

Philippine peso

58,765

RUB

Russian rouble

86,7600

THB

Thai baht

38,129

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1386

MXN

Mexican peso

23,7864

INR

Indian rupee

86,3850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# Official Journal C 282/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 282 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6026 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 282

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6026 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 282/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8305 — Rockwell Collins/ B/E Aerospace) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 282/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8251 — Bite/Tele2/Telia Lietuva/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 282/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8449 — Peugeot/Opel) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 282/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8305 — Rockwell Collins/ B/E Aerospace) (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 282/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8251 — Bite/Tele2/Telia Lietuva/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 282/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8449 — Peugeot/Opel) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 282/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 282/04

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 282/05 | Call for proposals — EACEA/33/2017 — Europe for Citizens programme 2014-2020 — Operating grants — Structural support for European think tanks and for civil society organisations at European level | 4 |
| 2017/C 282/06 | Call for proposals — ‘Support for information measures relating to the EU Cohesion policy’ | 10 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 282/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8589 — SCOR/MutRé) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 13 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2017/C 282/05

Call for proposals — EACEA/33/2017 — Europe for Citizens programme 2014-2020 — Operating grants — Structural support for European think tanks and for civil society organisations at European level

4

2017/C 282/06

Call for proposals — ‘Support for information measures relating to the EU Cohesion policy’

10

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 282/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8589 — SCOR/MutRé) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Richard SMITH *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 75-84

528 S.W. 2d 359

Opinion delivered September 22, 1975

*534
      *Bill E. Ross,*Public Defender, for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Gary Isbell,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In March, 1974, the appellant was found guilty of burglary and was sentenced to 21 years in the penitentiary. He did not appeal. Later on he filed the present petition for postconviction relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. In appealing from the denial of his petition he argues four grounds for reversal.

First, we find no denial of the appellant’s right to a speedy trial. After the information was filed in 1972, Smith escaped from jail and left the state. He was arrested in Mississippi and sentenced to prison there. He concedes that it was then his duty to affirmatively request a trial in Arkansas in order to set our statute in motion. *Randall*v. *State,*249 Ark. 258, 458 S.W. 2d 743 (1970). His only request, however, was made under our statutory Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Ark. Stat. Ann., Title 43, Ch. 32 (Supp. 1973). That request was ineffective, because Mississippi had not adopted the statute and hence was not a party to the interstate agreement. *Young*v. *State,*254 Ark. 72, 491 S.W. 2d 789 (1973). Smith was promptly tried after he was returned to Arkansas.

*535His second and third contentions assert matters that occurred before trial: That bail was fixed in an excessive amount, and that conditions in the county jail were so insanitary and oppressive as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Neither point falls within the scope of Rule 1. The denial of bail is not a ground for the dismissal of criminal charges, *Small*v. *City of Little Rock,*253 Ark. 7, 484 S.W. 2d 81 (1972), and certainly does not affect the validity of the sentence. Jail conditions fall in the same category, there being no contention that the conditions complained of affected the petitioner’s trial or sentence.

Fourth, it is argued that some of the prospective jurors, before the trial began, overheard a discussion about the merits of the case and about the appellant’s criminal record. At the Rule 1 hearing the petitioner testified that after the trial someone told him about the incident. The rules of evidence apply to such a hearing. *Lewis*v. *State,*251 Ark. 128, 471 S.W. 2d 349 (1971). Hence the trial court properly sustained an objection to the petitioner’s testimony, as it was hearsay.

Affirmed.

Fogleman, J., not participating.
#### § 48.515 Are there any exceptions to those actions?

The Secretary may waive with respect to a particular award, in writing, a suspension of payments under an award, suspension or termination of an award, or suspension or debarment of a recipient if the Secretary determines that such a waiver would be in the public interest. This exception authority cannot be delegated to any other official.
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

#### § 51.60 Standards applicable for payment of per diem.

The provisions of this subpart are the standards that a State home and facility management must meet for the State to receive per diem for nursing home care.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 21, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00376

- CR

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS , ex. rel. Todd Durden, County Attorney

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patrici a O. Alvarez , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On June 20, 2019, relator filed a motion for temporary relief asking this court to “issue an

Order of Stay” as to three criminal proceedings. The motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on June 21, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No s

. 100 0 5 CR, et al. , styled The State of Texas v. Maria Villarreal Cervantes,

et al. , pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas . The Honorable James T. Shahan and the Honorable

Enrique Fernandez are the respond ents

.
# C_2021475EN.01000401.xml

| 25.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2021/C 475/04)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Malta

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Malta

Subject of commemoration: Heroes of the pandemic

Description of the design: The design is created by Maria Anna Frisone and depicts two medical professional bracing themselves up to face the unknown. It is meant to extoll the services of these selfless individuals who have been on the forefront of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. At the top, in semi-circle, is the inscription ‘HEROES OF THE PANDEMIC’. At the bottom, in semi-circle, is the inscription ‘MALTA – 2021’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 72 500

Date of issue: June 2021

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 07-40087 Summary Calendar

_____________________ SETH T. DYRCZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GRAHAM BROTHERS OF LONGVIEW, LLC d/b/a GRAHAM CENTRAL STATION, OF LONGVIEW; LONGVIEW CLUB ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a GRAND CENTRAL STATION, LONGVIEW; LONGVIEW ENTERPRISES LTD, Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(2:05-CV-476) Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff-Appellant Seth T. Dyrcz appeals from the take-nothing judgment as a matter of law entered by the district court against Dyrcz following a personal injury jury trial in which Dyrcz was awarded $40,724.602

for physical impairment and $10,000 for physical pain and mental anguish, reduced by 40% for his contributory negligence. The basis for the post-verdict take-nothing judgment was a Release and Assumption of Risk executed by Dyrcz immediately prior to a “Dodge Ball Contest,” expressly releasing, indemnifying, and holding harmless Graham Central Station Longview, its partners, agents, and employees, from any responsibility or li ability for personal injury incurred in participating in the dodge ball contest in question. We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal in this case, and the law and evidence pertaining to the validity and extent of coverage of the Release and Assumption of Risk signed by Dyrcz, as well as his testimony and sti pulation regarding the circumstances of the execution of that instrument and his knowledge, appreciation, and understanding of its contents and purposes. Based on this review, we are convinced that the district court correctly granted the motion of Defendant Longvie w Enterprises, Ltd. for a judgment as a matter of law, for the reasons cogently set forth in the court’s Memorandum Order signed November 13, 2006. AFFIRMED.
# C_2013004EN.01000101.xml

| 9.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 January 2013

2013/C 4/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3086 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5766 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2092 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,587 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1245 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3281 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2466 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2899 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1435 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5660 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6080 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 390,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2239 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1462 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5725 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 655,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9817 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,401 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6090 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,834 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6483 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6881 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,0580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3086

JPY

Japanese yen

114,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81450

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5766

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2092

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,587

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1245

RON

Romanian leu

4,4110

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3281

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2466

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2899

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1435

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5660

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6080

KRW

South Korean won

1 390,63

ZAR

South African rand

11,2239

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1462

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5725

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 655,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9817

PHP

Philippine peso

53,401

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6090

THB

Thai baht

39,834

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6483

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6881

INR

Indian rupee

72,0580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 1995, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,769
<INVENTORY>                                        120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,542
<PP&E>                                          47,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        123
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,617
<SALES>                                         18,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,438
<CGS>                                            3,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,394
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,394
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 20.1202-20.1299 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23493]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6773]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Uzbekistan Related to Budget Transparency

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of 
Uzbekistan, and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
 Jacob J. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-23493 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0513

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TERRANCE ANTHONY ROBERTS,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including September 17, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2023

08/10/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0513
§ 14.50 Where insurance activities may take place. ( a ) *General rule.* A bank or Federal savings association must, to the extent practicable, keep the area where the bank or Federal savings association conducts transactions involving insurance products or annuities physically segregated from areas where retail deposits are routinely accepted from the general public, identify the areas where insurance product or annuity sales activities occur, and clearly delineate and distinguish those areas from the areas where the bank's or Federal savings association's retail deposit-taking activities occur.
( b ) *Referrals.* Any person who accepts deposits from the public in an area where such transactions are routinely conducted in the bank or Federal savings association may refer a consumer who seeks to purchase an insurance product or annuity to a qualified person who sells that product only if the person making the referral receives no more than a one-time, nominal fee of a fixed dollar amount for each referral that does not depend on whether the referral results in a transaction.
[65 FR 75839, Dec. 4, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 28399, May 16, 2014]