alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License no.
Name/Address
Date reissued018784N
Champion Cargo Services, LLC, 9523 Jamacha Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91977
October 15, 2008.020535N
Destiny Global Export Corp., 12 Kingsberry Dr., Somerset, NJ 08873
November 13, 2008.016320N
Eurotrans Systems, Inc., 299 Broadway, Suite 1815, New York, NY 10007
December 12, 2008.017234N
Ever-Swift Worldwide Inc., Cargo Bldg. 151, Ste. 377, Jamaica, NY 11430
November 25, 2008.000010F
Footner and Company, Inc., 6610-B Tributary Street, Baltimore, MD 21124
October 8, 2008.002541F
Kog Transport, Inc., 299 Broadway, Ste. 1815, New York, NY 10007
December 12, 2008.003490N
Rose International, Inc., dba Rose Maritime Container Line, 410 Ogden Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07307
October 30, 2008.019149F
Uniwide Cargomovers & Travel, Inc., 1232 W. 223rd Street, Torrance, FL 90502
November 8, 2008.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E9-2367 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
MISCONDUCT OF JURY.

[Guernsey Circuit Court,

December Term, 1892.]

Laubie, Frazier and Woodbury, JJ.

#### ROLAND C. PARKER v. GEO. H. BLACKWELDER.

Admission of Juror’s Verdict to Impeach Verdict.

Proof. — Affidavits of jurors not admissible after verdict to impeach same unless evidence *aliunde*is first offered — The affidavit of one of the attorneys in the case, as to statements of jurors to him, not such evidence *aliunde*as to make competent affidavits of jurors themselves as to the same facts.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Guernsey county.

In the court of common pleas Blackwelder sued Parker upon some notes. The case was tried to a jury, verdict was rendered for Blackwelder for the full amount claimed, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. Parker moved for a new trial upon the ground of misconduct of the jury, and supported this with the affidavits of three jurors, and that of his attorney. The affidavits of the three jurors disclosed that the jury retired for deliberation on Saturday; that on Saturday evening, by consent of counsel, they were permitted to separate until Monday morning; that' at that time they stood six to six upon the issues joined; that on Monday morning when they reassembled, it was represented in the jury room by one or more of their number to those who voted for the defendant below that the defendant below was insolvent, and that a verdict against him would not hurt him; that these three believed this to be true, and accordingly voted for the plaintiff below. The affidavit of the attorney simply disclosed what one of these three jurors, who himself filed an affidavit, had told the attorney, after verdict, of the matters above stated. , The court of common pleas overruled the motion.

R. W. Anderson, for Parker.

Fred. L. Rosemond, *contra.*

WOODBURY, J.

The common pleas' did not err. Affidavits of jurors cannot be received after • verdict to impeach the same unless evidence *aliunde*is first offered; and the affidavit of the attorney did not constitute such a showing *aliunde,*because it simply contained a statement at second hand of what the juror himself testified to in his own affidavit, and the juror’s affidavit itself being incompetent, secondary proof of its statements would be likewise incompetent. The court cited Hulet v. Barnett, 10 O., 460; Farrer v. State, *2*O. S., 54; Kent v. State, 42 O. S., 426.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 4, 2015, is made by and between
Navios Maritime Partners L.P., a Marshall Islands limited partnership (“NMLP”) and Navios ShipManagement Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (“NSM”, and together with NMLP, the “Parties”) and
amends the Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”) entered into among the Parties on November 16, 2007 and the Amendments to the Management Agreement entered into among the Parties on October 27,
2009, October 21, 2011, October 30, 2013, August 29, 2014 and February 10, 2015 (together, with the Management Agreement, the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this
Amendment shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement. 
 W I T N E S S E
T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The following para shall be added in “Schedule “B”, Fees and Costs
and Expenses: 
 The Parties have agreed that NMLP may, upon request, reimburse NSM, its affiliates and/or subsidiaries, partially or
fully, at NMLP’s sole discretion, in cash, cash equivalents or other financial instruments for any of the items referred to in Schedule C(2) and (11). 

2. The following para shall be added in “Schedule “C”, Extraordinary fees and Costs: 

(11) NMLP shall pay for any hire expense adjustment incurred in connection with any time charter of the Vessels to Navios Maritime Holdings
Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries, including but not limited to any off-hire adjustment, Owners’ items to be deducted from hire etc, in accordance with the terms of the relevant time charter. 

3. Full Force and Effect. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. 
 4. Effect. Unless the context otherwise requires, the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment shall be read
together and shall have effect as if the provisions of the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment were contained in one agreement. After the effective date of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement to “this Agreement,”
“hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder” or words of like import referring to the Agreement shall mean the Agreement, as amended, as further modified by this Amendment. 

5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute a single
instrument. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page to follow.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

	
	NAVIOS MARITIME PARTNERS L.P.
	
	 /s/ Efstratios Desypris

	By: Efstratios Desypris
	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	
	NAVIOS SHIPMANAGEMENT INC.
	
	 /s/ George Achniotis

	By: George Achniotis
	Title: President/Director

 [Signature Page – Amendment No. 6 to Management Agreement]
§ 19.23 Applicability of provisions concerning Notice of Disagreement. ( a ) Appeals governed by § 19.21(a) shall be processed in accordance with § 19.24. Sections 19.26 and 19.28 shall not apply to appeals governed by § 19.21(a).
( b ) Appeals governed by § 19.21(b) shall be processed in accordance with §§ 19.26 and 19.28.
[79 FR 57697, Sept. 25, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB
for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics,
Inc.


Date:  September 10, 2004

                                            By: /s/  James R. Musick
                                               --------------------------------
                                            Name:    James R. Musick
                                            Title:   President, Chief Executive
                                                     and Principal Financial
                                                     Officer
                                                     Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
#### Abraham Oberstein et al., Respondents, *v.*Susan M. Diack, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

*710Charles N. Morgan *&*Son, for appellant.

Leon Sanders, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

From the judgment, it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant.

The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife’s interest in the policy.

From the evidence, it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant.

Present: Truax, P. J., Soott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23816]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Issuance of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standard 36, Reporting Comprehensive Long-Term Fiscal Projections for 
the U.S. Government

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued 
Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standard 36, Reporting 
Comprehensive Long-Term Fiscal Projections for the U.S. Government.
    The standard is available on the FASAB home page http://www.fasab.gov/standards.html. Copies can be obtained by contacting 
FASAB at (202) 512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at 
(202) 512-7350.

    Authority:  Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463.

    Dated: September 29, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23816 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

#### § 4.4 Invention promoter reply.

(a) If a submission appears to meet the requirements of a complaint, the invention promoter named in the complaint will be notified of the complaint and given 30 days to respond. The invention promoter's response will be made available to the public along with the complaint. If the invention promoter fails to reply within the 30-day time period set by the Office, the complaint will be made available to the public. Replies sent after the complaint is made available to the public will also be published.

(b) A response must be clearly marked, or otherwise identified, as a response by an invention promoter. The response must contain:

(1) The name and address of the invention promoter;

(2) A reference to a complaint forwarded to the invention promoter or a complaint previously published;

(3) The name of the individual signing the response; and

(4) The title or authority of the individual signing the response.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 1403.3 Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system. ( a ) Any present or former employee of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation seeking access to that person's official civil service records maintained by the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation shall submit a request in such manner as is prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management.
( b ) Individuals shall submit their requests in writing to the Privacy Act Officer, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, McLean, Virginia 22102-0826, when seeking to obtain the following information from the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation: ( 1 ) Notification of whether the agency maintains a record pertaining to that person in a system of records;
( 2 ) Notification of whether the agency has disclosed a record for which an accounting of disclosure is required to be maintained and made available to that person;
( 3 ) A copy of a record pertaining to that person or the accounting of its disclosure; or
( 4 ) The review of a record pertaining to that person or the accounting of its disclosure.
The request shall state the full name and address of the individual, and identify the system or systems of records believed to contain the information or record sought.
#### § 1263.8 Subject to inspection and regulation requirement.

An applicant shall be deemed to be subject to inspection and regulation, as required by section 4(a)(1)(B) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1424 (a)(1)(B)) and § 1263.6(a)(2) if, in the case of an insured depository institution or insurance company applicant, it is subject to inspection and regulation by its appropriate regulator. A CDFI applicant that is certified by the CDFI Fund is not subject to this requirement.
#### Catherine A. Pope, Respondent, *v.*John A. Wilbur et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered on a verdict, and from an order denying a new trial.

Dudley R. Horton, for appellants.

Beniamin F. Edsall (Isaac L. Miller, of counsel), for respondent.

Hascall, J.

We think that the proofs and rulings shown by the case do not justify disturbance of the record below.

Judgment and order appealed' from should "be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB
for the quarter ended April 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics,
Inc.







Date: June 18, 2003                        By: /s/  James R. Musick
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: James R. Musick
                                              Title: President, Chief Executive
                                              and Principal Financial Officer
                                              Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
# \D-oLut_im

Douglas Saitta

=14 g -;AAVEIE-Wi 

### r

court's findings related to NRS 193.165 (weapons enhancement), which required district court to consider factors similar to NRS 193.167(3), would be granted relief only upon showing of plain error). Here, the district court did not expressly indicate that it considered the mandated factors but was aware of the facts and circumstances of the crime and appellant's extensive criminal history. The district court heard argument that appellant suffered physical, mental, and sexual abuse as a child and struggles with substance abuse problems. Although there is no mention of the impact of the crime on the victim, counsel argued that appellant understood that his crime was perpetrated on an elderly victim. And appellant expressed his remorse for the crime, which the district court considered sincere. Although the district court did not strictly follow the requirements of NRS 193.167(3), considering the record as a whole, we conclude that appellant failed to demonstrate plain error. We further conclude that appellant failed to show that the district court abdicated its sentencing responsibility. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

cc: Second Judicial District Court Dept. 8 Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ••••,, 2
§ 1320.14 Emergency exception. ( a ) *Emergency exception.* Notwithstanding §§ 1320.11 and 1320.12, the Council may waive or modify any or all of the notice, hearing, and other requirements of §§ 1320.11 and 1320.12 with respect to a financial market utility if— ( 1 ) The Council determines that the waiver or modification is necessary to prevent or mitigate an immediate threat to the financial system posed by the financial market utility; and
( 2 ) The Council provides notice of the waiver or modification, and an explanation of the basis for the waiver or modification, to the financial market utility concerned, as soon as practicable, but not later than 24 hours after the waiver or modification.
( b ) *Vote required.* Any determination by the Council under paragraph (a) to waive or modify any of the requirements of §§ 1320.11 and 1320.12 shall— ( 1 ) Be made by the Council; and
( 2 ) Require the affirmative vote of not fewer than two-thirds of members then serving, including the affirmative vote of the Chairperson of Council.
( c ) *Request for hearing.* Within 10 calendar days from the date of any provision of notice of waiver or modification of the Council, the financial market utility may request, in writing, an opportunity for a written or oral hearing before the Council to demonstrate that the basis for the waiver or modification is not supported by substantial evidence.
( d ) *Written submissions.* Upon receipt of a timely request, the Council shall fix a time, not more than 30 calendar days after receipt of the request, and place at which the financial market utility may appear, personally or through counsel, to submit written materials, or, at the sole discretion of the Counsel, oral testimony and oral argument.
( e ) *Notification of hearing determination.* If a financial market utility makes a timely request for a hearing under paragraph (c) of this section, the Council shall, not later than 30 calendar days after the hearing date, notify the financial market utility of the determination of the Council, which shall include a statement of the basis for the determination of the Council.
# Official Journal C 90A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.090.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5527 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.090.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5527 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2012/C 090A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/194/10 — English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2012/C 090A/01

Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/194/10 — English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

1

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

| 27.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 90/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 90/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/194/10

ENGLISH-LANGUAGE (EN) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

(2012/C 90 A/01)

Court of Justice

| HILL | Richard |
| --- | --- |
| MACKENZIE | Gordon |
| MAMDANI | Geoffrey Aasif |
| MILTON | Elliot |
| SINFIELD-HAIN | Sandra |
| YATES | Paul |

HILL

Richard

MACKENZIE

Gordon

MAMDANI

Geoffrey Aasif

MILTON

Elliot

SINFIELD-HAIN

Sandra

YATES

Paul

The reserve list will be valid until 23 February 2013 and may be extended.

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

---