alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. 20460

September 16, 2004

THE ADMINISTRATOR

EPA-SAB-COUNCIL-ADV-04-004 Dr. Trudy Ann Cameron Chair Advisory Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis Office of the Science Advisory Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Dr. Cameron: Thank you for writing on behalf of the Advisory Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis to offer valuable advice on the Environmental Protection Agency’s plans for the review of the Revised Analytical Plan for the upcomi ng Second Prospective Analysis of the Clean Air Act. I applaud the thoroughness and technical sophistication of your advisory, and I appreciate the Council’s ongoing efforts to provide high-quality advice regarding the design and implementation of this important series of studies. Given the substantial scope and depth of the advisory, EPA will respond by taking specific actions to address and implement the report’s recommendations through the redirection of our analytical efforts. These analytical changes will be reflected in the first draft of the study report, which will be submitted to the Council for review. In addition, EPA anticipates conducting additional interim consultations with the Council and its subcommittees, during which the project team will describe EPA’s efforts to address all the key elements of your advisory. Again, I appreciate the scientifically rigorous and sound advice provided by the Advisory Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis, and I look forward to continuing the productive working relationship between the Council and EPA. Sincerely, / Signed /

Michael O. Leavitt
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 27, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00802

- CV

Southwest Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. d/b/a American Pharmacies, Appellant

v.

Texas Health and Human Services Commission; and Kyle Janek
, solely in h is official Capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND HENSON ;

JUSTICE HENSON NOT P ARTICIPATING

AFFIRMED

-- OP INION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adj udged and ordered that the judgment of the

district court is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified

below for obse rvance.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Second United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Activities

# 									Second United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Activities							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 29, 2024

On March 29, the United States hosted the second meeting of the U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea (ROK) Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group to counter cyber threats posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), following the first trilateral Working Group in Tokyo in December 2023.  Led by U.S. Deputy Special Representative for the DPRK Lyn Debevoise, Japanese Ambassador in charge of  Cyber Policy Kumagai Naoki, and ROK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director General for North Korean Nuclear Affairs Lee Jun-il, the group reviewed the substantial progress made in deepening trilateral collaboration to disrupt the DPRK’s ability to generate revenue through malicious cyber activity and IT workers, which it uses to fund its unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs.

Through this working group, the United States, the ROK, and Japan will continue to coordinate on a wide range of trilateral actions, underscoring the historic cooperation agreed to at the Camp David Summit, to share information, disrupt DPRK IT worker networks, engage partners and private industry on the DPRK cyber threat, and develop trilateral capacity building assistance efforts.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCyber IssuesCyber SecurityJapanNorth KoreaOffice of the Coordinator for Cyber IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonTechnologyWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
# C_2021375EN.01000201.xml

| 17.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2021

(2021/C 375/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1763 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85025 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1518 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0886 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1293 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,281 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 350,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9488 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,9663 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6077 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4863 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1575 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6548 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5805 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 380,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0544 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5849 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5041 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 766,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8952 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,715 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,2347 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,918 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1611 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3728 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,4730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1763

JPY

Japanese yen

128,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85025

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1518

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0886

ISK

Iceland króna

151,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1293

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,281

HUF

Hungarian forint

350,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5763

RON

Romanian leu

4,9488

TRY

Turkish lira

9,9663

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6077

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4863

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1575

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6548

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5805

KRW

South Korean won

1 380,44

ZAR

South African rand

17,0544

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5849

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5041

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 766,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8952

PHP

Philippine peso

58,715

RUB

Russian rouble

85,2347

THB

Thai baht

38,918

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1611

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3728

INR

Indian rupee

86,4730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices 

# Order

September 9, 2015

148412

- 3 & (89)

EMILY KINCAID,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 148412

COA: 310148

Wayne CC: 11

- 004918

- NI

ROBERT CROSKEY and WOLPIN

COMPANY, d/b/a TRI

- COUNTY

BEVERAGE COMPANY/WAYNE

COUNTY,

Defendants

- Appellants/

Cross

- Appellees,

and

EXAMWORKS,

Nonparty

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellee.

___________________________________/

EMILY KINCAID,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 148413

COA: 311857

Wayne CC: 11

- 004918

- NI

ROBERT CROSKEY and WOLPIN

COMPANY, d/b/a TRI

- COUNTY

BEVERAGE COMPANY/WAYNE

COUNTY,

Defendants

- Appellants/

Cross

- Appellees,

and

CLIFFORD LEE, JR.,

Intervening Plaintiff.

___________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

a0831 2

Clerk On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

question s presented should be reviewed by this Court.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON REHEARING

NO. 03-12-00538-CR

Cheri Lucille Howard, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 69690, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We withdraw our opinion and judgment issued on February 28, 2013 and substitute

the following opinion in place of the earlier opinion.

Appellant Cheri Lucille Howard appeals from a judgment convicting her of

possession of a controlled substance less than one gram, enhanced. See Tex. Health & Safety Code

Ann. § 481.115 (West 2010).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009);see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75
(1988). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of her right to examine the

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant has filed letters

with the Court. Although she raises the failure to receive effective counsel as a possible ground for

appeal, she requests that the appeal be dismissed. We have independently reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. See Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with appellant’s counsel that the record reflects no arguably

meritorious grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous. 

However, as pointed out by appellant’s counsel in his brief, the judgment orders

appellant to pay attorney’s fees of $450 after release from incarceration. “A defendant who is

determined by the court to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the remainder of the

proceedings in the case unless a material change in the defendant’s financial circumstances occurs.” 

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2012); Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 557

(Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The trial court determined that appellant was indigent, and we find nothing

in the record to support a finding that appellant’s financial circumstances have materially changed. 

Therefore, no evidence supports the trial court’s orderrequiring appellant to payattorney’s fees. See

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2012). Accordingly, we modify the judgment

to reflect that appellant does not owe attorney’s fees.

As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted.

2
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed

Filed: March 26, 2013

Do Not Publish

3
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1904

COREY LEVON BECKHAM , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 7:16

- cv - 00161

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Corey Levon Beckham, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Core y Levon Beckham seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on Beckham’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or jud ge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Beckham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pau peris, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63

OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Barbara A. Klein, the chief financial officer of CDW Computer Centers,
Inc, (CDW), certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the 10-K) of CDW fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CDW.

| |                                                                                                                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Barbara A. Klein

Barbara A. Klein
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CDW Computer Centers, Inc.
March 28, 2003
<PAGE>

September 27, 1999

Mr. Paul Boyer
P.O. Box 980064
3504 West Daybreaker Drive
Park City, UT 84098-0064

VIA Fax:  801-974-1928

Dear Paul,

Per our discussion, this letter serves as our offer of employment with
BriteSmile, Walnut Creek, California.

Position and Terms:        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
------------------

                           Annual Base Salary $160,000

-Stock Options:            150,000 shares vested over five years on the
                           following schedule

                           -Year 1 - 50,000 shares vest at the anniversary of
                           your starting date.

                           -Years 2-5 - 25,000 shares vest at the end of each
                           year.

Temporary Living Expense:  BriteSmile will pay for temporary living expenses
                           including travel up to three months (i.e.
                           rent/utilities). BriteSmile will also provide the
                           equivalent of one month's salary to cover incidental
                           expenses.

-Moving Expenses:          All household goods from Utah to California at
                           reasonable competitive costs.

-Other Benefits:           Medical and dental benefits are covered in the
                           enclosed package.

-Involuntary Termination:  If your employment is terminated at any time without
                           cause, you will be entitled to six months salary
                           continuation.

Paul I believe the above summarizes our offer in brief but concise terms.  We
are extremely happy that you will be joining the BriteSmile team and we look
forward to your starting with us.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Reed
-------------
John Reed                                            Accepted:

cc:  Linda Oubre                                     /s/ Paul A. Boyer 9-27-99
     Tony Pilaro
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 50804)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; NRSA Predoctoral Training Program in Systems Biology.                    

*Date:*                         October 28, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, 301-435-6889.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 25, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23718 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7262

ARTHUR J. RIDLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-98-1201-JFM)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur J. Ridley, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur J. Ridley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ridley v. Beshears, No. CA-98-1201-

JFM (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2021520EN.01000701.xml

| 27.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 520/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 520/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 December 2021

(2021/C 520/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1317 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84389 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3300 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0402 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0043 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,014 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 370,82 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6190 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9498 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 13,2402 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5645 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4502 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8255 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6589 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5343 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5821 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2064 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5108 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 056,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7480 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,592 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,2027 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,833 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4229 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3103 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1317

JPY

Japanese yen

129,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84389

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3300

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0402

ISK

Iceland króna

147,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0043

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,014

HUF

Hungarian forint

370,82

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6190

RON

Romanian leu

4,9498

TRY

Turkish lira

13,2402

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5645

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4502

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8255

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6589

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5343

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,18

ZAR

South African rand

17,5821

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2064

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5108

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 056,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7480

PHP

Philippine peso

56,592

RUB

Russian rouble

83,2027

THB

Thai baht

37,833

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4229

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3103

INR

Indian rupee

84,8850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### § 1408.35 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365 (5 U.S.C. 5514)), which authorizes the collection of debts owed by Federal employees to the Federal Government by means of salary offsets. These regulations provide procedures for the collection of a debt owed to the Government by the imposition of a salary offset against amounts payable to a Federal employee as salary. These regulations are consistent with the regulations on salary offset published by the Office of Personnel Management, codified in 5 CFR part 550, subpart K. Since salary offset is a type of administrative offset, the requirements of subpart B also apply to salary offsets.