alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 84 E/0889)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0450/04

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Counterfeit banknotes

The European Central Bank has stated that 550 000 counterfeit euro banknotes were withdrawn from circulation in 2003. The banknotes withdrawn included the following denominations: EUR 50 (52 %), EUR 20 (30 %) and EUR 100 (12,7 %). Can the Commission indicate what initiatives it has proposed or intends to propose to curtail this phenomenon, and the total amount of euros withdrawn from circulation?

Answer given by Mrs Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(25 March 2004)

The protection of the euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting is carried out jointly by the competent national authorities, the European Central Bank, Europol and the Commission. The roles and responsibilities of these European institutions and bodies are complementary.

With a view to protecting euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting, Community legislation has been adopted including, ‘inter alia’, the following:

These mechanisms guarantee strong protection for the euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting, through enhanced collaboration across countries and disciplines and intense training at national, European and international level.

The Commission is currently committing significant resources to the complete implementation of the Community acquis regarding the protection of the euro in the new Member States. Particular emphasis is put on combating the rising threat of euro counterfeits coming from countries outside the EU. The establishment of joint investigation teams among Member States, with the involvement of Europol, is enhancing actions by law enforcement agencies.

The Commission, in collaboration with Member States and the other European institutions and bodies, is also working to ensure complete implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001, particularly Article 6 regarding the obligations of credit institutions.

Finally, communication action is being intensified by the European Central Bank and the Commission, as regards the protection of the euro.

The Commission will continue to take all necessary initiatives to reinforce the protection of euro banknotes and coins against fraud and counterfeiting.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 of 28 June 2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, Council Decision of 29 April 1999 extending Europol's mandate to deal with forgery of money, OJ C 149, 28.5.1999.

(2)  Council Framework Decision of 29 May 2000 on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro, OJ L 140, 14.6.2000.

(3)  Council Decision 2001/923/EC of 17 December 2001 establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of euro against counterfeiting OJ L 339, 21.12.2001.

----
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-504 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL RELATIONS 

 Implementing Accord Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHINA 

Signed at Beijing May 4, 2012 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHINA 

Cultural Relations 

 Implementing Accord signed at Beijing May 4, 2012; 

 Entered into force May 4, 2012.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

OBED RADAI ENRIQUEZ

,

Appellant

,

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00169

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20180D01312 )

O R D E R

The Court G R ANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter’s Record until February 4

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WIL BECONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is furth er OR DERED that Evangelina Morales

, Official Court Reporter for the

Criminal District Court No. 1

, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the

A bove styled and numbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before February 4

,

201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20 th day of December , 20 18

.

PER CURIAM

B efore McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1901

___________

Robert M. Jordan, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Dodge County Sheriff's Department; * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

Defendant, * of Nebraska.

*

Dan Weddle, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED]

capacity as Sheriff of Dodge County, *

Nebraska, *

*

Defendant-Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 13, 2000

Filed: January 21, 2000

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert M. Jordan was terminated from his job as a Dodge County, Nebraska

deputy sheriff after an on-the-job injury left him with permanent physical limitations

that rendered him unable to make forcible arrests and unable to lift and carry people in
-2-

need or passively resisting demonstrators. Jordan sued Dodge County Sheriff Dan

Weddle in his individual capacity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming Weddle violated

Jordan's equal protection rights by terminating Jordan because of his disabilities.

Weddle moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and appeals the

denial of that motion. We reverse.

Weddle is entitled to qualified immunity if he did not violate Jordan's

constitutional right to equal protection. Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers

because he has not shown that any other Dodge County officer has been permitted to

continue working with physical limitations and permanent medical restrictions like

Jordan's. Because Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers, no equal protection

violation could have occurred and a reasonable officer in Weddle's place could not have

known equal protection would be offended if Jordan were terminated. See Hansen v.

Rimel, 104 F.3d 189, 190 (8th Cir. 1997). We thus reverse the district court's denial

of Weddle's motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered May 6, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00069-CV

RENESHA O. GRIFFIN, Appellant

V.

ESTELLE VILLAGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-03882-B

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated March 29, 

2022, we notified the Dallas County Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We 

directed the Dallas County Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To

date, the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN

DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that 

appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record and that she 
is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We notify appellant that if we

receive verification she has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the 

record and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we will, without 

further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to:

John Warren

Dallas County Clerk

All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00481-CR

Adrian Robert Brooks

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1207839D)

August 7, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          83,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,945,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,067,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,061,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,067,166
<SALES>                                         99,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,379
<CGS>                                           62,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,421
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2540 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

period of service in uniformed services as continued employment for 

purposes of pension and retirement benefits for individuals who die 

during the period of service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. POMEROY (for himself and Mr. HASTINGS of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

treatment of period of service in uniformed services as 

continued employment for purposes of pension and retirement benefits for individuals who die during the period 

of service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Existing Re5 tirement Obligations for Every Servicemember Act of 

6 2007’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2540 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PERIOD OF SERVICE IN UNI2 FORMED SERVICES AS CONTINUED EMPLOY3 MENT FOR PURPOSES OF PENSION AND RE4 TIREMENT BENEFITS FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO 

5 DIE DURING THE PERIOD OF SERVICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 43 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in section 4312(f)— 

9 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘para10 graph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and 

11 (4)’’; and 

12 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(4) In the case of a person referred to in subsection 

15 (a) who dies during the period of service in the uniformed 

16 services, a surviving relative of the person shall notify the 

17 employer referred to in that subsection of the person’s 

18 death as soon as possible after the death of the person.’’; 

19 and 

20 (2) in section 4318, by adding at the end the 

21 following new subsection: 

22 ‘‘(d) In the case of a person referred to in subsection 

23 (a) of section 4312 who dies during the period of service 

24 in the uniformed services, the employer referred to in that 

25 subsection shall, upon receipt of notice of the person’s 

26 death, for purposes of any benefit covered by this section, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2540 IH

1 treat the person as not having incurred a break in service 

2 with the employer or employers maintaining the plan until 

3 the date of the person’s death. That person shall have the 

4 same rights under this section as a person reemployed 

5 under this chapter and that employer shall be liable under 

6 this section with respect to that person in the same man7 ner the employer is liable to a person reemployed under 

8 this section.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this Act shall apply with respect to a person who dies on 

11 or after January 1, 2007. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Oklahoma Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Oklahoma Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 2:30 p.m. on 
Thursday, October 15, 2009. The purpose of this meeting is to plan 
activities for a future SAC project.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
30354990. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4 p.m. on October 12, 2009.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by November 30, 2009. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5036223f32393e233f3e1025233333227e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f593879a979c9b869a9bb58086969687db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-23801 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2022482EN.01000101.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 482/01)

Last publication

OJ C 472, 12.12.2022

Past publications

OJ C 463, 5.12.2022

OJ C 451, 28.11.2022

OJ C 441, 21.11.2022

OJ C 432, 14.11.2022

OJ C 424, 7.11.2022

OJ C 418, 31.10.2022

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### JOHN L. CRANMER v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 405; 271 U. S. 665]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court April 26, 1926.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctioning Iranian Officials Connected to Serious Human Rights Abuses

# 									Sanctioning Iranian Officials Connected to Serious Human Rights Abuses							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 21, 2022

Since protests erupted across Iran in September, the Iranian regime has responded with ruthless crackdowns on peaceful protestors in an effort to suppress the Iranian people’s voices.  Iranian authorities have killed hundreds of peaceful protestors, including dozens of children, and arbitrarily detained thousands, in addition to using sexual violence against protestors, according to extensive and credible reports.  Iranian courts issued harsh sentences to protestors, including the death penalty, following sham trials lacking fair trial guarantees.

Today, we are taking additional actions to confront these human rights abuses by designating five Iranian officials and one entity, pursuant to Executive Order 13553, which authorizes sanctions with respect to serious human rights abuses by the Government of Iran.  Specifically, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating Mohammad Jafar Montazeri, the Prosecutor-General of Iran; Moslem Moein, the chief of the Basij Cyberspace Headquarters; Hassan Hassanzadeh, the commander of IRGC forces in Tehran; Seyed Sadegh Hosseini, the commander of the IRGC’s Beit-al Moghadas Corps of Kurdistan province; and Hossein Maroufi, the Deputy Coordinator of the Basij.

Additionally, OFAC is designating Imen Sanat Zaman Fara Company, an Iranian manufacturer of armored vehicles, tactical gear, and other materials that are actively used by the Iranian Law Enforcement Forces and other Iranian security forces in protest suppression.

The United States continues to support the people of Iran in the face of this brutal repression, and we are rallying growing international consensus to hold the regime accountable.  Thousands of brave Iranians have risked their lives and their liberty to protest the regime’s long record of oppression and violence.  We again call on Iran’s leadership to immediately cease its violent crackdown and to listen to its people.   We will continue to promote accountability for those involved as we support the Iranian people.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsHuman Rights and DemocracyIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2648

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the use of proceeds 

of tax exempt private activity bonds for community and water facility 

loans guaranteed under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mr. POMBO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

the use of proceeds of tax exempt private activity bonds 

for community and water facility loans guaranteed under 

the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2648 IH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF PROCEEDS OF TAX EXEMPT PRIVATE 

2 ACTIVITY BONDS FOR COMMUNITY AND 

3 WATER FACILITY LOANS GUARANTEED 

4 UNDER CONSOLIDATED FARM AND RURAL 

5 DEVELOPMENT ACT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 149(b) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to excep8 tions) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(E) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS THE PRO11 CEEDS OF WHICH ARE FOR CERTAIN LOANS

12 GUARANTEED UNDER CONSOLIDATED FARM

13 AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT.—Paragraph 

14 (1) shall not apply to any bond the proceeds of 

15 which are used to make a loan which is guaran16 teed by the Secretary of Agriculture under sec17 tion 306(a) of the Consolidated Farm and 

18 Rural Development Act (as in effect on the date 

19 of the enactment of this subparagraph).’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) shall apply to obligations issued after the 

22 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 141.22 [Reserved]
§ 1092.203 Optional one-time registration of NMLS-published covered orders. ( a ) *One-time registration option with respect to an NMLS-published covered order.* With respect to any NMLS-published covered order, a covered nonbank that is identified by name as a party subject to the order may elect to comply with the one-time registration option described in this section in lieu of complying with the requirements of §§ 1092.202 and 1092.204.
( b ) *Information to be provided.* The covered nonbank, in the form and manner specified by the Bureau, shall provide such information that the Bureau determines is appropriate for the purpose of identifying the covered nonbank and the NMLS-published covered order, and otherwise for the purpose of coordinating the nonbank registry with the NMLS.
( c ) *No further obligation to provide or update information with respect to the NMLS-published covered order.* Upon providing such information, the covered nonbank shall have no further obligation under this subpart to provide information to, or update information provided to, the nonbank registry regarding the NMLS-published covered order.