alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6416

ANTHONY LORENZO COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00046-AWA-LRL)

Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 25, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lorenzo Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kiernan Fitzgerald, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lorenzo Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition, and its order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for 

reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coleman has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2022233EN.01002801.xml

| 16.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/28

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 June 2022

(2022/C 233/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0431 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4392 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86328 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6278 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0435 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3868 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,703 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 397,96 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6690 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9427 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0465 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5051 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3498 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1883 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6706 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4519 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7111 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0013 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 361,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6037 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,627 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,529 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3164 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4763 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,5142 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0431

JPY

Japanese yen

140,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4392

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86328

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6278

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0435

ISK

Iceland króna

137,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3868

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,703

HUF

Hungarian forint

397,96

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6690

RON

Romanian leu

4,9427

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0465

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5051

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3498

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1883

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6706

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4519

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,86

ZAR

South African rand

16,7111

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0013

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 361,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6037

PHP

Philippine peso

55,627

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,529

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3164

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4763

INR

Indian rupee

81,5142

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-218 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SATELLITES 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAPAN 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington February 18, 2005 

with 

Implementing Arrangement 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
JAPAN 

Satellites 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes 

 at Washington February 18, 2005; 

 Entered into force February 18, 2005. 

 With implementing arrangement.
# National Public Lands Recognition Day, 2009 

Borne out of a commitment to protect and preserve our natural treasures, America's public lands are an indispensable component of American life. As we work to protect their integrity for future generations, vast expanses of land remain available for the use and enjoyment of all who visit them. National Public Lands Day is an opportunity for all Americans, young and old, to celebrate the majesty of our open spaces and devote our collective efforts to conserving our Nation's unique landscapes.

Today, from the largest National Parks and Forests to neighborhood playgrounds and urban parks, 130,000 volunteers are working on over 2,000 public land improvement projects across the Nation. Committed individuals, including participants from schools and universities, private businesses, non-profit organizations, and government agencies, are continuing the American tradition of stewardship through their service.

Dedicated to improving all aspects of our natural environment, this year's Public Lands Day focuses on water. Across the country, volunteers are highlighting the need to protect our Nation's water bodies by monitoring water quality in rivers and lakes, restoring wetlands, preventing stormwater runoff and erosion, cleaning up trash from shorelines, and learning techniques to conserve water at home.

Public lands help preserve our Nation's quality of life, offering fresh water, abundant natural resources, and educational and recreational opportunities. I was proud to sign the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to add to our Nation's treasured landscapes and build on our rich history as guardians of our natural environment. Today, we affirm our resolve to conserve these cherished spaces for our enjoyment and for that of future generations.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 26, 2009, as National Public Lands Day. I invite all my fellow citizens to join me in a day of service for our public lands.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-23757

Billing code 3195-W9-P
# C_2021513EN.01000203.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/2

---

Election of the Vice-President of the Court

(2021/C 513/04)

At a meeting on 8 October 2021, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to Article 8(4) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Bay Larsen as Vice-President of the Court for the period from 8 October 2021 to 6 October 2024.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Population Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: November 5-6, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Madison Hotel, 1177 15th St., NW., Washington, DC 
20005.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435-6898. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5324323f3f2030133e323a3f7d3d3a3b7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97e0f6fbfbe4f4d7faf6fefbb9f9feffb9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23716 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D IE T Z IN T E RN A T IO N A L P U B L IC A D J U S T E R S O F C A L I F O RN I A , I N C ., a C a l i f orni ac orpor a t i on, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. E VA NS T ON I NS UR AN C E C OMP AN Y, a n I l l i noi s c orpor a t i on, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 56267 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c v-06 66 2-M M M -E ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a r ga r e tM . M orr ow , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 11, 2013 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: B E R Z O N , T A L L M A N , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED APR15 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

P l a i nt i f f D i e t z I nt e rna t i ona l P ubl i c A dj us t e r s of C a l i f orni a , I nc . appe a l s the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f

s u m m a ryju d g m e n t to d e f e n d an t E v an s to n I n s u r an c e C o . in D i e t z ’ s d i v e r s i tya c t i o n s e e k i n g r e i mb u r s e me n to f p ay me n t s ma d e t o s e tt l e c l a i ms a ga i ns ti t . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, H a n sen v. D ep ’t

o f T rea su ry , 5 2 8 F .3 d5 9 7 , 6 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) , an dw e a f f irm . T h e s ta tu to rylan g u a g e o f S e c tio n 5 5 4 o f

th e C a lif

o rn iaI n s u r an c e C o d e is u n a m b ig u o u s a n dd o e s n o t p r e c lu d e E v an s to n f r o m e n f o r c in g ap r o v is io n in D i e t z ’ s pr of

e s s i ona l l i abi l i tyi ns ur anc e pol i c ytha tba r s D i e t z f r om m a ki ng v o lu n taryp a y m e n ts to s e ttle c la im s a g a in s t it. Se e I ns ua v . Sc ot t

s dale I ns . C o. , 104 C a l. A p p . 4 th 7 3 7 , 7 4 3 ( 2 0 0 2 ) , re vi ew deni ed , N o. S 112788 ( F e b 25, 2003) (hol di ng thati nsurercoul d ass ertvo l un t ary pay m ent s def ense even w hen i tfa i l ed t o p rom pt l y a ss erta l at e not i ce defe nse) . O n its f a c e , S e c tio n 5 5 4 p r o v id e s o n lyf o rth e w a iv e ro f

a n in s u r e r ’s la te n o tic e d e f

e n s e , as ub s tan tiv e lyd if f e r e n t d e f e n s e th an th e v o lu n taryp ay m e n ts d e f e n s e th a t E v a n s to n a s s e rte da t s u m m aryju d g m e n t. Se e id. B ec ause D i etz f ai l ed to d e m o n s tr a te th a t E v a n s to n in te n tio n a llyr e lin q u is h e dits r ig h t to r a is e its vo l un t ary pay m ent s def ense , E vanst on has notw ai ved thatdefe nse und er C a lif o rn ialaw . See W

al lerv. T ruck Ins. E xc h. , Inc. , 11 C al . 4th 1 , 31 (199 5). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 12(a)
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (1)
  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,(dollars in thousands)
    

2003
    

2004
    

2005
    

2006
    

2007
    

2008Net (loss) income
    
    (39,755
    )
    13,155
    
    41,779
    
    43,899
    
    46,217
    
    9,723Income tax (benefit) expense
    
    (23,573
    )
    11,305
    
    31,899
    
    34,227
    
    37,185
    
    14,086Fixed charges
    
    142,545
    
    127,933
    
    147,069
    
    173,889
    
    226,537
    
    231,683Earnings
    
    79,217
    
    152,393
    
    220,747
    
    252,015
    
    309,939
    
    255,492Interest expense, net
    
    93,285
    
    75,584
    
    89,160
    
    111,644
    
    159,849
    
    157,956Rents under leases
representative of an
interest factor
    
    48,895
    
    51,984
    
    57,544
    
    61,880
    
    66,323
    
    73,362Preferred dividends
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365
    
    365Fixed charges
    
    142,545
    
    127,933
    
    147,069
    
    173,889
    
    226,537
    
    231,683Ratio of earnings to
fixed
charges(2)
    
    0.6
    x
    1.2
    x
    1.5
    x
    1.5
    x
    1.4
    x
    1.1
    x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earnings divided by fixed charges.
For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges is
defined as the sum of interest expense, preferred stock dividends and the component of rental
expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts.(2)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2003, earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges by $63.3 million.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-302 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MOZAMBIQUE 

Signed at Maputo June 24, 2003 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MOZAMBIQUE 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at Maputo June 24, 2003; 

 Entered into force March 2, 2004.
#### § 1301.1 General.

This subpart contains the regulations of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the “Council”) implementing the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. These regulations set forth procedures for requesting access to records maintained by the Council. These regulations should be read together with the FOIA, which provides additional information about this topic.
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

JUNE, 1900.

#### The Eureka Stable Co., Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment of $328.83, rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before Hon. Theodore E. Hascall and a jury. The action was brought to recover damages for injury to the team of the plaintiff.

Henry A. Robinson (Charles F. Brown, of counsel), for appellant.

Holm *&*Smith (Victor E. Whitlock, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff’s witness Schildwachter, who had qualified as an expert, was asked “ What would you say to be the difference between the value of that coach at the time you saw it then that day, and after it left your shop; after it had been repaired? ” To this question the defendant objected on the ground that it was “ incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial, as assuming facts not proved, and that it is a comparison which is a question for the jury in this case.” This objection was overruled, and the defendant duly excepted. On cross-examination the witness testified, in substance, that he had no particular remembrance of the condition of the carriage before the accident, and thereupon the defendant moved to strike out .the evidence of the witness as to value, on the ground that it appeared that the witness was not able-to state what the condition of the carriage was before the accident. Tin's motion was denied, and the defendant duly excepted. This motion should have been granted. The witness, not knowing the condition of the carriage before the accident, was not able to tell how much it had been injured by the accident.

But he had testified that he made certain repairs to the carriage* *701and the reasonable and fair value of the work he did was $158.70, and, therefore, the judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless the respondent consents to a reduction of the verdict to $158.70, in which «event the judgment and order appealed from will be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court, or in the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appel-' lant to abide event, unless respondent consents to reduce the verdict to $158.70, in which event judgment affirmed, without costs.
# Official Journal L 174I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 174I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6418 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 174I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6418 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/796 of 17 May 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/796 of 17 May 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1102

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

#### § 1102.28 Documents and exhibits in proceedings public.

Unless and until otherwise ordered by the ASC or unless otherwise provided by statute or by ASC regulation, all documents, papers and exhibits filed in connection with any proceeding, other than those that may be withheld from disclosure under applicable law, shall be placed by the Secretary in the proceeding's public file and will be available for public inspection and copying at the address set out in § 1102.24 of this subpart.
Exhibit 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XV Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  June  30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Larson,  Chief  Financial Officer of AEI  Fund  Management  86-A,
Inc.,  the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                              /s/ Mark E Larson
                                  Mark E. Larson
                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                  AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.,
                                  the Managing General Partner
                                  August 6, 2002
- Office Home
- About Us
- Resources
- Protocol Reference
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of the Chief of Protocol...Resources

# 						Resources					

4 items

          -    		Deans of the Diplomatic Corps	   
          -    		Airport Escort Screening Courtesies	   
          -    		Port Courtesies	   
          -    		Domestic Workers	   

Back to Top