alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.7 ASC determination. ( a ) *Order by the ASC.* Within 90 calendar days of the date of publication of the notice in the Federal Register, the ASC, by Order, shall either grant or deny a waiver, in whole or in part, and upon specified terms and conditions, including provisions for waiver termination. The Order shall be published in the Federal Register, which in the case of an Order approving a waiver, shall only be published after FFIEC approval of the waiver (*see* paragraph (b) of this section). Such Order shall respond to comments received from interested members of the public and shall provide the reasons for the ASC's finding(s).
( b ) *Approval by the FFIEC.* Any ASC Order approving a waiver shall be effective only upon FFIEC approval of the waiver. FFIEC consideration of a waiver is not subject to the ASC's 90-day timeframe for a determination.
§ 1402.24 Advance payments—notice. ( a ) Where it is anticipated that the fees chargeable will amount to more than $25 and the requester has not indicated in advance a willingness to pay fees as high as are anticipated, the requester shall be promptly notified of the amount of the anticipated fee or such portion thereof that can be readily estimated.
( b ) If the anticipated fees exceed $250 and if the requester has a history of promptly paying fees charged in connection with information requests, the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation may obtain satisfactory assurances that the requester will fully pay the fees anticipated.
( c ) If the anticipated fees exceed $250 and if the requester has no history of paying fees charged in connection with information requests, the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation may require an advance payment of fees in an amount up to the full amount anticipated.
( d ) If the requester has previously failed to pay a fee charged within 30 days of the date of a billing for fees charged in connection with information requests, the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation may require the requester to pay the fees owed, plus interest, or demonstrate that the full amount owed has been paid, and require the requester to make an advance payment of the full amount of the fees anticipated before processing a new request or a pending request from that requester.
( e ) The notice of the amount of an anticipated fee or a request for an advance deposit shall include an offer to the requester to confer with identified Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation personnel to attempt to reformulate the request in a manner which will meet the needs of the requester at a lower cost.
#### § 1073.208 Refunds.

Amounts recovered by administrative offset but later found not to be owed to the Government shall be promptly refunded. Unless required by law or contract, such refunds shall not bear interest.
# Official Journal C 341/13 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 341 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 341

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 341/01 | Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the European Union Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (2019) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 341/01

Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the European Union Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (2019)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE I, Barbara A. Klein, the chief financial officer of CDW Corporation, (CDW), certify that (i)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the 10-K) of CDW fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CDW. /s/ Barbara A. KleinBarbara A. KleinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerCDW CorporationMarch 15, 2005
# Do7- GJ7- 

## 199£- I

### i71

. '_,·_, RESOLUTION NO. 4276-1485 A RESOLUTIO'N 

# OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRESCOTT, 

### YAYAPAJ COl.JNJY, ARIZONA, SUPPORTING THE CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIALAIR SERVICE 'FOR PRESCOTT MUNICIPALAIRPORT BYGREAT LAKESAVIATION. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Essential Air Service (EAS) program was created by Congress to assure a minimum level of commercial air service to smaller communities served by certificated aircarriers priorto the 1978Airline Deregulation Act; and WHEREAS, Great Lakes Aviation (Great Lakes) was the sole respondent to the recent Order Requesting Proposals (Docket #DOT-OST-1996-1899) issued by the U.S. DepartmentofTransportation; and WHEREAS, the Great Lakes submission identified three (3) EAS options for the City ofPrescott, Arizona (Prescott); and WHEREAS, Prescott has a 10-year history of participating in the EAS Program, and wishes to continue such participation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Prescott wishes to indicate its support for and endorsement ofthe EAS application of Great Lakes, and to affirmatively request that Great · Lakes provide air passenger service to Los Angeles from Prescott (as the subsidized route) on the basis of not less than two (2) roundtrips per day utilizing 30-passenger Embraer EMS 120 aircraft; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Prescott recognizes that the availability ofcommercial air service is vital to the future economic growth ofthe Prescott region, and is an important factor in investmentdecisions by prospective businesses; and WHEREAS, independent research has verified the enhanced economic benefit that would accrue to the Prescott region by air service expansion for Prescott, especially to eastern hubs; and WHEREAS, Prescott has benefitted from air service provided by Great Lakes in recentyears, and wishesto formally convey its supportfortheir proposal. ENACTMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRESCOTTAS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Thatthe City ofPrescott hereby expresses its supportfor continuation of EssentialAir Servicefrom and to Prescott Municipal Airport. Section 2. That Prescott endorses the proposal ofGreat Lakes Aviation to provide Essential AirServiceforthe City.RESOLUTION NO. 4276-1485 PAGE2

Section 3. That the City of Prescott requests that Great Lakes Aviation commit to provide Essential Air Service between Prescott and Los Angeles using Embraer EMB 120 aircraft, with not lessthan two daily nonstopflights. · Section4. That Prescott hereby expresses its strong interest in obtaining air service additional tothat provided underthe EAS program, to other hubs such as Denverand Phoenix, to expand the airtravel choices available to residents ofthe Prescott region. Section 5. That the Mayor and staff are hereby authorized to sign this Resolution and any other necessary documents, and take any further action to effectuate the terms contained herein.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Prescottthis 10th dayofFebruary, 2015.



# ~k~~._~

**~~D. KU~ALL,**  Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVEDAS TO FORM:



# DAe!G~ City Clerk
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Mali

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Mali			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mali  

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Mali 

During the review period, the transition government made its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report available online within a reasonable period.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available, except major state-owned enterprise debt.  Publicly available budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the transition government’s planned expenditures and revenue, including natural resource revenues.  It was unclear whether the transition government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to adequate audit or oversight.  Information regarding allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises was lacking.  The information in the budget was considered broadly reliable, and significant deviations from projections were described in publicly available revised estimates.  The transition government did not have a unified supreme audit institution that met international standards of independence.  Audit institutions reviewed the transition government’s accounts, but audits did not cover the entire annual executed budget and were not published within a reasonable period.  The transition government specified in law and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Mali’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Detailing allocations to, earnings from, and debts of state-owned enterprises; and
- Establishing a single supreme audit institution that meets international standards of independence, audits the entire annual executed budget, and publishes its reports within a reasonable period.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mali  

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMali

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 1080.8 Withholding requested material. ( a ) Any person withholding material responsive to a civil investigative demand or any other request for production of material shall assert a claim of privilege not later than the date set for the production of material. Such person shall, if so directed in the civil investigative demand or other request for production, submit, together with such claim, a schedule of the items withheld which states, as to each such item, the type, specific subject matter, and date of the item; the names, addresses, positions, and organizations of all authors and recipients of the item; and the specific grounds for claiming that the item is privileged. The person who submits the schedule and the attorney stating the grounds for a claim that any item is privileged must sign it.
( b ) A person withholding material solely for reasons described in this subsection shall comply with the requirements of this subsection in lieu of filing a petition for an order modifying or setting aside a civil investigative demand pursuant to section 1080.6(e).
( c ) Disclosure of privileged or protected information or communications produced pursuant to a civil investigative demand shall be handled as follows: ( 1 ) The disclosure of privileged or protected information or communications shall not operate as a waiver with respect to the Bureau if: ( i ) The disclosure was inadvertent;
( ii ) The holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and
( iii ) The holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including notifying a Bureau investigator of the claim of privilege or protection and the basis for it.
( 2 ) After being notified, the Bureau investigator must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if he or she disclosed it before being notified; and, if appropriate, may sequester such material until such time as a hearing officer or court rules on the merits of the claim of privilege or protection. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.
( 3 ) The disclosure of privileged or protected information or communications shall waive the privilege or protection with respect to the Bureau as to undisclosed information or communications only if: ( i ) The waiver is intentional;
( ii ) The disclosed and undisclosed information or communications concern the same subject matter; and
( iii ) They ought in fairness to be considered together.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2023

No. 04-23-00868-CR

EX PARTE Oscar Gamboa QUEZADA

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11369CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the court DISMISSES this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED on December 27, 2023.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of December, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
# C_2022372EN.01000201.xml

| 29.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 September 2022

(2022/C 372/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9565 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90268 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9194 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9437 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4576 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,650 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 411,72 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8043 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9485 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,7311 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4924 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3157 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,5084 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6998 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3846 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 378,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2916 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9199 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5313 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 622,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4281 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,528 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,687 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1728 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5294 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,2655 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9565

JPY

Japanese yen

138,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90268

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9194

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9437

ISK

Iceland króna

139,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4576

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,650

HUF

Hungarian forint

411,72

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8043

RON

Romanian leu

4,9485

TRY

Turkish lira

17,7311

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4924

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3157

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,5084

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6998

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3846

KRW

South Korean won

1 378,84

ZAR

South African rand

17,2916

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9199

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5313

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 622,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4281

PHP

Philippine peso

56,528

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,687

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1728

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5294

INR

Indian rupee

78,2655

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-120260, No. 333-43925, No. 333-48172, and No. 333-98123) of CDW Corporation of our report datedMarch 3, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  Chicago, Illinois  March 3, 2006
Interleaf, Inc.

                  EXHIBIT 11-COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                              Three months ended
                                                                    June 30

                                                                  1997     1996
                                                                  ----     ----
In thousands, except for per share amounts                         (unaudited)
Primary
Weighted average shares outstanding of Common Stock             17,624   16,998
Dilutive Senior Series B and Senior
  Series C Convertible Preferred Stock                           5,178        -
Dilutive stock options                                             147        -
Dilutive stock purchase warrants                                     -        -
Dilutive stock purchase plan rights                                 25        -
                                                               -------  -------
Total                                                           22,974   16,998
                                                               =======  ======= 
                                                               $   386  $(3,800)
                                                               =======  ======= 
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) per share                                    $  0.02  $ (0.22)
                                                               =======  ======= 
 
Fully Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding of Common Stock             17,624   16,998
Dilutive Senior Series B and Senior Series C 
  Convertible Preferred Stock                                    5,178        -
 
Dilutive stock options                                             300        -
Dilutive stock purchase warrants                                     -        -
Dilutive stock purchase plan rights                                 32        -
                                                               -------  -------
                                                                23,134   16,998
                                                               -------  -------
Total
                                                               $   386  $(3,800)
                                                               =======  ======= 
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) per share                                    $  0.02  $ (0.22)
                                                               =======  ======= 

The dilutive effect of stock options, stock purchase warrants, and stock
purchase plan rights are calculated using the treasury stock method. Under this
method, these common stock equivalents are assumed to be exercised and proceeds
from the exercise are assumed to be used to repurchase common stock at the
average market price for primary income (loss) per share and the higher of the
end of the period or average market price for fully diluted income (loss) per
share. The dilutive effect of Convertible Preferred Stock is calculated using
the if-converted method.
#### Jennie Levene, Appellant, *v.*John Hahner, Respondent.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

October, 1900.)

Costs — In Municipal Court, not affected by transfer of action to City Court of the city of New York.

Costs, in an action begun in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, are not affected by a subsequent transfer of the action to the City Court of the city of New York, and it is, therefore, erroneous for the clerk to tax costs in favor of the defendant because the plaintiff, after transfer, did not recover fifty dollars in the City Court.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Special Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming the clerk’s taxation of costs.

Julius Lehmann, for appellant.

Robert L. Turk, for respondent.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, in the Eighth Judicial District of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, for one hundred dollars as damages for the loss of a bicycle belonging to him, through the negligence of the defendant, who was a common carrier. The action, upon the defendant’s motion, was duly transferred to this court. Upon the trial judgment was recovered against the defendant for forty-three dollars and seventy-three cents: Upon the defendant’s application a bill of costs was taxed by the clerk against the plaintiff for- seventy-one dollars and seventy-eight cents because he had failed to recover a judgment of fifty dollars or over. Upon an appeal to the Special Term by the plaintiff, the clerk’s taxation was affirmed; in our judgment this was error. The defendant, in this court, had no greater rights than those conferred upon him in the District Court. His rights, as well as the plaintiff’s rights, remained unchanged by the transfer. Upon the recovery of this judgment, the plaintiff obtained all the rights which he would have had if the action was tried in this court.

*635Order appealed from reversed, also the clerk’s taxation, and he is directed to tax the charges, allowed by the Code of Civil Procedure, in the plaintiff’s favor.

Conlan and Hascall, JJ., concur.

Order reversed.
#### § 1208.44 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs.

FHFA shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on debts owed to the Federal Government, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and the FCCS. FHFA may also assess interest and related charges on debts that are not subject to 31 U.S.C. 3717 and the FCCS to the extent authorized under the common law or other applicable statutory authority.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793631
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XV LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         530,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,097
<PP&E>                                       5,956,575
<DEPRECIATION>                               (920,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,571,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,409,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,571,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               631,184
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                714,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            714,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   714,915
<EPS-BASIC>                                      96.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    96.47


</TABLE>