alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1271.30 Definitions. As used in this subpart: *Administrative expenses.* ( 1 ) Include general office and operating expenses such as telephone and photocopy charges, printing, legal, and professional fees, postage, courier services, and office supplies; and
( 2 ) Do not include any form of employee compensation, custodian fees, issuance costs, or any interest on (and any redemption premium with respect to) any Financing Corporation obligations.
*Custodian fees* means any fee incurred by the Financing Corporation in connection with the transfer of any security to, or maintenance of any security in, the segregated account established under section 21(g)(2) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441(g)(2)), and any other expense incurred by the Financing Corporation in connection with the establishment or maintenance of such account.
*Directorate* means the board established under section 21(b) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441(b)) to manage the Financing Corporation.
*Insured depository institution* has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
*Issuance costs* means issuance fees and commissions incurred by the Financing Corporation in connection with the issuance or servicing of Financing Corporation obligations, including legal and accounting expenses, trustee, fiscal, and paying agent charges, securities processing charges, joint collection agent charges, advertising expenses, and costs incurred in connection with preparing and printing offering materials to the extent the Financing Corporation incurs such costs in connection with issuing any obligations.
*Non-administrative expenses* means custodian fees, issuance costs, and interest on Financing Corporation obligations.
*Obligations* means debentures, bonds, and similar debt securities issued by the Financing Corporation under sections 21(c)(3) and (e) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441(c)(3) and (e)).
*Receivership proceeds* means the liquidating dividends and payments made on claims received by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation Resolution Fund established under section 11A of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1821a) from receiverships, that are not required by the Resolution Funding Corporation to provide funds for the Funding Corporation Principal Fund established under section 21B of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441b).
§ 1269.2 Standby letters of credit on behalf of members. ( a ) *Authority and purposes.* Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm on behalf of members standby letters of credit that comply with the requirements of this part, for any of the following purposes: ( 1 ) To assist members in facilitating residential housing finance;
( 2 ) To assist members in facilitating community lending;
( 3 ) To assist members with asset/liability management; or
( 4 ) To provide members with liquidity or other funding.
( b ) *Fully secured.* A Bank, at the time it issues or confirms a standby letter of credit on behalf of a member, shall obtain and maintain a security interest in collateral that is sufficient to secure fully the member's unconditional obligation described in § 1269.4(a)(2) of this part, and that complies with the requirements set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Eligible collateral.* ( 1 ) Any standby letter of credit issued or confirmed on behalf of a member may be secured in accordance with the requirements for advances under § 1266.7 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A standby letter of credit issued or confirmed on behalf of a member for a purpose described in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section may, in addition to the collateral described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, be secured by obligations of state or local government units or agencies, where such obligations have a readily ascertainable value, can be reliably discounted to account for liquidation and other risks, and can be liquidated in due course.
[63 FR 65699, Nov. 30, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 8265, Feb. 18, 2000; 65 FR 44431, July 18, 2000. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 12853, Mar. 20, 2002; 75 FR 8240, Feb. 24, 2010; 75 FR 76623, Dec. 9, 2010; 78 FR 67009, Nov. 8, 2013]
EXHIBIT 10.03


                      ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT'S FISCAL YEAR 2001
                              EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN


Target annual bonuses are set for each executive based upon a percentage of base
salary.  Bonuses are generally  paid in two parts,  one of which relates only to
the Company's  earnings  results,  and the second part is  discretionary  and is
measured against each individual executive's contributions.  Some executives may
have a third part  which  relates to a  specific  business  unit's or  product's
financial performance achievement.  Bonuses are paid after the end of the fiscal
year.  If profits in any period are less than 85% of plan, no bonus based on the
Company's  performance is paid for that period.  If profits exceed plan during a
period,  the bonus rate is accelerated for the  incremental  profits above plan,
with a maximum of 200% payout of the bonus target.
§ 16.16 Effectiveness. ( a ) Registration statements and amendments filed with the OCC pursuant to this part will become effective in accordance with sections 8(a) and (c) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77h(a) and (c)) and SEC Regulation C (17 CFR part 230, Regulation C—Registration).
( b ) The OCC will deem registration statements and amendments that become effective pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section to be declared effective. If the OCC deems a registration statement to be declared effective, the OCC will also deem the prospectus that was filed as a part of that registration statement to be declared effective.
[59 FR 54798, Nov. 2, 1994, as amended at 82 FR 8108, Jan. 23, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Statement of Financial Condition at April 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the 
Statement of Income for the Quarter Ended April 30, 1998 (Unaudited). It 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Apr-30-1998
<CASH>                                       14639
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               176686
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 276718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            433151
<PP&E>                                      158010
<DEPRECIATION>                              131346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              607595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       241058
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    281001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                607595
<SALES>                                     783908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            783908
<CGS>                                       316333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               215292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             19227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             233056
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                233056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.04

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1266
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1266 appear at 75 FR 76622, Dec. 9, 2010.

§ 1266.13 Special advances to savings associations. ( a ) *Eligible institutions.* ( 1 ) A Bank, upon receipt of a written request from the OCC, with respect to a federal savings association, or from the FDIC, with respect to a state chartered savings association, may make short-term advances to a savings association member pursuant to section 10(h) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1430(h)).
( 2 ) Such request must certify that the savings association member: ( i ) Is solvent but presents a supervisory concern to the OCC or FDIC, as appropriate, because of the member's financial condition; and
( ii ) Has reasonable and demonstrable prospects of returning to a satisfactory financial condition.
( b ) *Terms and conditions.* Advances made by a Bank to a member savings association under this section shall: ( 1 ) Be subject to all applicable collateral requirements of the Bank, this part and section 10(a) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1430(a)); and
( 2 ) Be at the interest rate applicable to advances of similar type and maturity that are made available to other members that do not pose such a supervisory concern.
[58 FR 29469, May 20, 1993. Redesignated at 65 FR 8256, Feb. 18, 2000 and further redesignated at 65 FR 44430, July 18, 2000; 81 FR 76298, Nov. 2, 2016]
EXHIBIT 31.1              CERTIFICATION
I, Robert L. Saxe, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Research Frontiers Incorporated ("RFI" or the "registrant")
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant  fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 9, 2004          /s/ Robert L. Saxe
                                   Robert L. Saxe
                                   Chairman and Chief
                                   Executive Officer
#### §§ 1610.4-1610.9 [Reserved]
§ 19.200 Effect of debarment, suspension, or censure. ( a ) *Debarment.* If the final order against the respondent is for debarment, the individual may not practice before the OCC unless otherwise permitted to do so by the Comptroller pursuant to § 19.201.
( b ) *Suspension.* If the final order against the respondent is for suspension, the individual may not practice before the OCC during the period of suspension.
( c ) *Censure.* If the final order against the respondent is for censure, the individual may be permitted to practice before the OCC, but such individual's future representations may be subject to conditions designed to promote high standards of conduct. If a written letter of censure is issued, a copy will be maintained in the OCC's files.
( d ) *Notice of debarment or suspension.* Upon the issuance of a final order for suspension or debarment, the Comptroller will give notice of the order to appropriate officers and employees of the OCC and to interested departments and agencies of the Federal government. The Comptroller will also give notice to the appropriate authorities of the state in which any debarred or suspended individual is or was licensed to practice.
Exhibit 10.4


 



Second Amendment to Terms & Conditions Regarding the Appointment of Mr. Vandoorn as Chief Technology Officer







This second amendment to Terms & Conditions Regarding the Appointment of Mr. Vandoorn as Chief Technology Officer (the "Second Amendment"), made as of March 3, 2015 by and between Vishay Capacitors Belgium N.V., a Belgian company ("Vishay Belgium"), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay"), and JOHAN VANDOORN ("Executive") (collectively the "Parties").







WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Vishay Belgium and is a Party to the Terms & Conditions Regarding the Appointment of Mr. Vandoorn as Chief Technology Officer made between the Parties dated January 16, 2012, as amended by the first amendment to the Terms & Conditions made between the Parties as of March 4, 2014 (collectively, the "Terms & Conditions");







WHEREAS, Vishay Belgium and Executive may amend the Terms & Conditions by mutual agreement in writing; and







 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Terms & Conditions as set forth in this Second Amendment.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


      1.Section 7.7(a) of the Terms & Conditions is hereby amended by replacing "2012" and "25%" in the first sentence with "2015" and "40%", respectively.







2.The amendments to the Terms & Conditions made by paragraph 1 of this Second Amendment shall be effective as of March 3, 2015.







3.Except as set forth in this Second Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Terms & Conditions shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







4.This Second Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.












[signatures on next page]




















  







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf as of the date first above written.












VISHAY CAPACITORS BELGIUM N.V.







By: /s/ W. Renders                              By:







Name: W. Renders                               Name:







Title: Managing Director                          Title:







Date: May 2, 2015                                Date:















































/s/ Johan Vandoorn




Johan Vandoorn







Date: April 20, 2015
#### § 48.630 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a Federal agency to prohibit a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions. A recipient so prohibited is debarred, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689.
HomeTransportation Recent Actions...Transportation – Sabotage Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, April 19, 2024

# 									Transportation – Sabotage Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, April 19, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [159 KB]

Tags

San MarinoTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
Exhibit 4.21.1

 



 

	
 
    	
ADDRESS REPLY TO

P.O. BOX 1734

ATLANTA, GA 30301

 
    


 

404 676-2121
    


 

Embotelladora Andina S.A.

Miraflores 9153, Renca

Santiago Chile

 

Dear Sirs,

 

In relation to the Bottler Agreement effective September 1, 2008, between THE COCA-COLA COMPANY (hereinafter the “Company”) and EMBOTELLADORA ANDINA S.A. (hereinafter the “Bottler”), by which the Bottler is authorized to prepare and package the Beverage COCA-COLA and in relation to any other supplementary authorization for other Company Beverages for sale and distribution under the Trademarks for the territory described in the Bottler Agreement (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Bottler Agreement”). The terms used herein have the same meaning attributed to them as in the Bottler Agreement, unless otherwise specifically noted.

 

The Bottler Agreement is hereby extended from June 30, 2014 until:

 

September 30, 2014

 

With the exception of said extension, all terms and conditions of the Bottler Agreement will remain in full force and effect and upon expiration of said extension, it inevitably will expire on September 30, 2014, without any notice and the Bottler shall not be entitled to claim a tacit renewal of the agreement.

 

Sincerely,

 

	
 
    	
ACCEPTED BY:
    
	
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
    	
EMBOTELLADORA ANDINA S.A.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By
    	
 
    
	
Authorized Representative
    	
Authorized Representative
42296.

#### ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. HALL.

*539Argued September 7, 1966

Decided October 7, 1966

Rehearing denied November 1, 1966

*Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, Larry E. Pedrick, John W. Bennett,*for appellant.

*Thomas A. Parker, Gibson, McGee & Blount, Lamar Gibson,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

The rule is well established in Georgia that the testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own behalf is to be construed most strongly against him when it is self-contradictory, vague or equivocal. *Western <&c. B. Co. v. Evans,*96 Ga. 481 (23 SE 494); *Southern B. Co. v. Hobbs,*121 Ga. 428 (49 SE 294), and many subsequent cases. *540We cannot agree with, appellant’s contention, however, that this rule should be applied under the circumstances existing here.

This court has strictly applied the rule and has held that it does not extend to or include a pre-trial deposition *(Branan v. LaGrange Truck Lines,*94 Ga. App. 829 (96 SE2d 364)); to an extra-judicial affidavit and letter *(Swift & Co. v. Hall,*94 Ga. App. 239 (94 SE2d 145)); to stricken pleadings containing an admission *(Bynes v. Stafford,*106 Ga. App. 406 (127 SE2d 159)), or to a signed statement taken by an investigator. *Tuggle v. Waller,*91 Ga. App. 721 (87 SE2d 123). In this case we have a statement taken by the company investigator and signed by the plaintiff. Even though such statement in some ways contradicted the testimony of the plaintiff on the trial of the case and was introduced in evidence by the defendant, the stated rule would not aid the defendant under the authorities cited above limiting its application to the actual testimony given by the party witness at the time of the trial. The plaintiff’s testimony at the time of the trial was to some extent explanatory of the discrepancies, and taken as a whole was not so contradictory, vague or equivocal as to the basic elements of his case as to invoke the application of the rule in this case.

In an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 TJ.S.C. § 51) there must be a complete absence of probative facts to support the verdict of the jury before reversible error appears on an issue as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The jury, in arriving at its verdict, if there is an evidentiary basis to support its conclusion, is free to discard or disbelieve whatever facts are inconsistent with its conclusion. Lavender v. Kurnm, 327 U. S. 645, 653 (66 SC 740, 90 LE 916); Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co., 375 U. S. 208, 210 (84 SC 291, 11 LE2d 256).

*“. . .*[W]hether a jury question is presented is narrowly limited to the single inquiry whether, with reason, the conclusion may be drawn that negligence of the employer played any part at all in the injury or death.” Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 507 (77 SC 443, 1 LE2d 493).

Applying this test the verdict for the plaintiff is supported by the evidence, and the trial court did not err in overruling the *541defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. in accordance with its previous motion for a directed verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 1208.42 Administrative offset prior to completion of procedures. FHFA shall not be required to follow the procedures described in § 1208.43 where: ( a ) Prior to the completion of the procedures described in § 1208.43, FHFA may effect administrative offset if failure to offset would substantially prejudice its ability to collect the debt, and if the time before the payment is to be made does not reasonably permit completion of the procedures described in § 1208.43. Such prior administrative offset shall be followed promptly by the completion of the procedures described in § 1208.43. Amounts recovered by administrative offset but later found not to be owed to FHFA shall be promptly refunded. This section applies only to administrative offset pursuant to 31 CFR 901.3(c), and does not apply when debts are referred to the Department of the Treasury for mandatory centralized administrative offset under 31 CFR 901.3(b)(1).
( b ) The administrative offset is in the nature of a recoupment (*i.e.,* FHFA may offset a payment due to the debtor when both the payment due to the debtor and the debt owed to FHFA arose from the same transaction); or
( c ) In the case of non-centralized administrative offsets, FHFA first learns of the existence of a debt due when there would be insufficient time to afford the debtor due process under these procedures before the paying agency makes payment to the debtor; in such cases, the Director shall give the debtor notice and an opportunity for review as soon as practical and shall refund any money ultimately found not to be due to the Federal Government.