alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2663

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin 

Islands, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2003

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 

Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

4 CASTLE NUGENT FARMS. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the south7 eastern shore of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is 

8 the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin 
2

•HR 2663 IH 

1 Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 

2 50 years. 

3 (2) This land has the largest and healthiest 

4 fringing coral reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands. 

5 (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and 

6 pasturelands with considerable cultural resources in7 cluding both pre-Columbian and post-European set8 tlement. 

9 (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large his10 toric 17th century Danish estate house that sits on 

11 over 4 miles of pristine Caribbean oceanfront prop12 erty. 

13 (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nest14 ing and night heron nesting, it is the home for the 

15 Senepol cattle breed, a unique breed of cattle that 

16 was developed on St. Croix in the early 1900’s to 

17 adapt to the island’s climate. 

18 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

19 out a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of des20 ignating Castle Nugent Farms as a unit of the National 

21 Park System. 

22 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

23 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 
3

•HR 2663 IH 

1 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

2 by this section.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2400

___________

Marvin Livingston, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Edward Adams, Originally Sued As Ed *

Adams; Cynthia Hunter, Originally * [UNPUBLISHED]

Sued As Hunter; Emmett Johnson, *

Originally Sued As Johnson; Sandra *

Dolphin, Originally Sued As Dolphin, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 5, 2012

Filed: May 3, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Marvin Livingston appeals the district court’s judgment

1

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after an evidentiary hearing. Following

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas. 
careful review, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that

defendant Edward Adams did not use excessive force during a January 27, 2009

incident, given the evidence of Livingston’s aggressive behavior and Adams’s use 

of an amount of force he deemed necessary to subdue Livingston. See Hartsfield v.

Colburn, 491 F.3d 394, 395-96 (8th Cir. 2007) (where there is no jury demand,

evidentiary hearing before magistrate judge in inmate’s conditions-of-confinement

case “is the equivalent of a bench trial”; appellate court reviews district court’s

factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo); Andrews v. Neer,

253 F.3d 1052, 1060-61 & n.7 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard for evaluating

excessive-force claims of pretrial detainees). We also agree with the district court

that Livingston’s failure to establish an excessive-force claim against Adams is fatal

to his claimthat the other defendants should have intervened. See Hicks v. Norwood,

640 F.3d 839, 843 (8th Cir. 2011). Further, to the extent Livingston is challenging

any discovery rulings, we find no abuse of discretion. See Lee v. Armontrout, 991

F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 0602 IN THE MATTER OF: B.A.B., Respondent and Appellant. **GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 2 , 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 2 2021

03/02/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0602
§ 19.38 Recommended decision and filing of record. ( a ) *Filing of recommended decision and record.* Within 45 days after expiration of the time allowed for filing reply briefs under § 19.37(b), the ALJ will file with and certify to the Comptroller, for decision, the record of the proceeding. The record must include the ALJ's recommended decision, recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law, and proposed order; all prehearing and hearing transcripts, exhibits, and rulings; and the motions, briefs, memoranda, and other supporting papers filed in connection with the hearing. The ALJ will serve upon each party the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order.
( b ) *Filing of index.* At the same time the ALJ files with and certifies to the Comptroller for final determination the record of the proceeding, the ALJ will furnish to the Comptroller a certified index of the entire record of the proceeding. The certified index must include, at a minimum, an entry for each paper, document, or motion filed with the ALJ in the proceeding, the date of the filing, and the identity of the filer. The certified index must also include an exhibit index containing, at a minimum, an entry consisting of exhibit number and title or description for: each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing; and each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing.
#### § 17.720 Payments under the grant.

Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and manner set forth in the Notice of Fund Availability.

(Authority: Sec. 307, Pub. L. 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 501)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00278

- CR

Sindey R. DENBINA

, Ap pellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR8319

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Extension of time to file the court reporter’s record is this date GRANTED IN PART . Time is

extended to August 3, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Nicolas A. Lahood

District Attorney, Bexar County

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205

Bettina J. Williams

Official Court Reporter

- 187th District Court

Cadena

- Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 2129

San Antonio, TX 78205 Anthony Cantu

Bexar County District Clerk

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva, Suite 217

San Antonio, TX 782 05

Michael D. Robbins

Appellate Public Defender's Office

101 W. Nueva, Suite 310

Paul Elizondo Tower 1

San Antonio, TX 78205
HomeAssisted Schools...Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Santa Cruz Cooperative School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Santa Cruz Cooperative School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +591-3-353-0808 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail:contactus@sccs.ed.bo | Website: web.sccs.edu.bo 
        -  This Fact Sheet is intended to provide general information. For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (overseasschools@state.gov / +1-202-261-8200) or the school directly.    

**Download Special Needs Profiles** (Santa Cruz 2024 Special Needs- Bolivia,) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**The Santa Cruz Cooperative School**is a private, coeducational day school, which offers an educational program from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 1959 and officially formed into a cooperative of parents in 1971. The school year comprises two semesters extending from the beginning of August to mid-December and from mid-January to the beginning of June. The school has maintained accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools since 1987, the Bolivian Ministry of Education since 1960, is a member of the American International Schools in the Americas (AMISA) and has been re-accredited by COGNIA in April 2019.

*This profile is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

 

Tags

BoliviaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Exhibit 31


                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, James R. Musick provides the following certification.

     I, James R. Musick, President, Chief Executive and Principal Financial
Officer of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company") certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14)
          for the registrant and have designed such disclosure controls and
          procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company
          is made know to me by others, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
          auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
          performing the equivalent functions):

          a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
               and have identified for the Company's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls, and

          b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees which have a significant role in the Company's
               internal controls; and

     6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
          significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could
          significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my
          most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
          to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: March 15, 2004                       /s/  James R. Musick
                                              ---------------------------------
                                               James R. Musick, President, Chief
                                               Executive and Principal Financial
                                               Officer
§ 1282.11 General. ( a ) *General.* Pursuant to the requirements of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4561-4564, 4566), this subpart establishes: ( 1 ) Three single-family owner-occupied purchase money mortgage housing goals, a single-family owner-occupied purchase money mortgage housing subgoal, a single-family refinancing mortgage housing goal, a multifamily special affordable housing goal, and two multifamily special affordable housing subgoals;
( 2 ) Requirements for measuring performance under the goals; and
( 3 ) Procedures for monitoring and enforcing the goals.
( b ) *Annual goals.* Each housing goal shall be established by regulation no later than December 1 of the preceding year, except that any housing goal may be adjusted by regulation to reflect subsequent available data and market developments.
[75 FR 55930, Sept. 14, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 53430, Sept. 3, 2015; 86 FR 73657, Dec. 28, 2021]
HomeSchools Worldwide...Schools Worldwide – Assisted Schools

# Schools Worldwide – Assisted Schools

The U.S. Department of State provides assistance to overseas schools through direct and indirect support programs designed to promote an American-style program.
							See All Assisted Schools							

## 						Learn more about assisted schools					

Learn more about each assisted school and a link to the Worldwide Fact Sheet.

Back to Top
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into
as of the 20th day of June, 2000 between Rosemary Street Productions, LLC
("Assignor") and Overseas Filmgroup, Inc. ("Assignee").

          WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee are parties to a Securities Purchase
Agreement dated May 3, 2000 ("Purchase Agreement"), pursuant to which Assignor
has agreed, among other things, to purchase the Securities from the Assignee
(capitalized terms not otherwise identified herein shall have the meaning
assigned to them in the Purchase Agreement); and

          WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign its rights and obligations under
the Assigned Contracts to Assignee, which desires to assume such
obligations.

          IT IS AGREED:

          1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of its right,
title and interest in and to and obligations under the Assigned Contracts.

          2. Assumption. Assignee hereby assumes such rights and agrees to pay,
satisfy and perform all of the obligations of Assignor pursuant to the
Assigned Contracts.

          3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the law of the State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this
Agreement on the date first above written.

                                    ROSEMARY STREET PRODUCTIONS, LLC


                                        /s/ Christopher Cooney
                                    By:______________________________________
                                       Name:   Christopher Cooney
                                       Title:  President


                                    OVERSEAS FILMGROUP, INC.


                                        /s/ William Lischak
                                    By:_______________________________________
                                       Name:  William Lischak
                                       Title: Chief Operating Officer, Chief
                                              Financial Officer and Secretary
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2665

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to protect the rights 

of employees to receive overtime compensation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2003

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. 

MCHUGH, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. ANDREWS, 

Mr. OWENS, and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to protect 

the rights of employees to receive overtime compensation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Overtime Compensa5 tion Protection Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF OVERTIME COMPENSATION. 

7 Section 13 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

8 is amended to read as follows: 
2

•HR 2665 IH 

1 ‘‘(k)(1) The Secretary shall not promulgate any regu2 lation that has the effect of exempting from the require3 ments of section 7 any employee who is not otherwise ex4 empted pursuant to regulations promulgated under this 

5 section that are in effect on the date of enactment of this 

6 subsection. 

7 ‘‘(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to 

8 prohibit the Secretary from reducing the number of em9 ployees who are exempt from the requirements of section 

10 7 by regulations promulgated under this section.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JerryC. Atkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ Jerry C. Atkin      |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |
| Jerry C. Atkin          |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| May 7, 2009        |   |   |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00192-CR

Davon D. Crenshaw

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1317429D)

April 2, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
#### § 1808.301 Eligible uses of Bond Proceeds.

Bond Proceeds must be used by a Qualified Issuer to finance Bond Loans or Refinance loans to Eligible CDFIs for Eligible Purposes as defined in section 1808.102 of this interim rule. A Qualified Issuer that is also a Certified CDFI may not finance a Bond Loan to itself or refinance its own loan. One hundred percent of the principal amount of each Bond must be used to make Bond Loans. As a Bond Loan is repaid, such repaid Bond Loan proceeds in excess of those required for debt service payments on the Bond must be used to repay the Bond or held in the Relending Account and used for additional Secondary Loans, to the extent authorized under § 1808.308.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-111 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

International Space Station 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ITALY 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Rome 

April 18, 2001 and January 11, 2005 

with 

Memorandum of Understanding 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ITALY 

 Space Cooperation: International Space Station 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Rome April 18, 2001 and January 11, 2005; 

 Entered into force January 11, 2005. 

 With memorandum of understanding. 

NOTE: This is an unofficial translation provided by the Government of Italy. When the official English translation becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
#### UNITED STATES v. BRILLIANT COAL CO.

[59 C. Cls. 481; 269 U. S. 588]

On appeal. *Dismissed*by the Supreme Court October 5, 1925, on motion of appellant.