alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

ROBIN RAY MARCHETTI, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-62 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed July 25, 2014. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. 

PER CURIAM. 

 The order striking Robin Ray Marchetti's motion for jail credit as untimely 

is reversed, as the motion was timely filed.1 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) ("For 

sentences imposed prior to July 1, 2013, a motion under this rule may be filed on or 

 1When the postconviction court entered its order in November 2013, the 

rule had not yet been amended to extend the filing limit for defendants whose sentences 

became final before July 1, 2013. See In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of 

Criminal Procedure and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 132 So. 3d 734 (Fla. 

2013); see also Calderon v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D967 (Fla. 2d DCA May 9, 2014). 
- 2 -

before July 1, 2014."). Therefore, we remand for reconsideration of the motion. 

 Reversed and remanded. 

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# CA2006180EN.01000101.xml

| 2.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 180/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 180/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON
                    FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT





The Board of Directors
Lamar Advertising Company:


The audits referred to in (a) our report dated February 5, 2003, except as to
Note 8 which is as of March 7, 2003, and (b) our report dated February 5, 2003,
except as to Note 5 which is as of March 7, 2003, included the related financial
statement schedules of Lamar Advertising Company and subsidiaries and Lamar
Media Corp. and subsidiaries for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2002. These financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedules of Lamar Advertising Company and
subsidiaries and Lamar Media Corp. and subsidiaries, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Lamar
Advertising Company and Lamar Media Corp. on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-89034,
333-10337, 333-79571, 333-37858 and 333-34840), S-3 (Nos. 333-66059 and
333-48288) and S-4 (No. 333-48266) of (a) our report dated February 5, 2003,
except as to Note 8 which is as of March 7, 2003, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Lamar Advertising Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and (b) our report dated February 5, 2003,
except as to Note 5 which is as of March 7, 2003, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Lamar Media Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder's
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002, annual report
on Form 10-K of Lamar Advertising Company.

Our reports refer to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business Combinations", and certain
provisions of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", as required
for goodwill and intangible assets resulting from business combinations
consummated after June 30, 2001 and the full adoption of the provisions of SFAS
No. 142 on January 1, 2002.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 24, 2003
#### § 150.10 What regulations govern the fiduciary operations of Federal savings associations?

A Federal savings association (“you”) must conduct its fiduciary operations in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1464(n) and this part.
#### § 1291.27 Scoring criteria for Targeted Funds.

A Bank shall adopt in its scoring methodology for each Targeted Fund established by the Bank at least three different scoring criteria, as determined by the Bank in its discretion, that allow the Bank to select applications that meet the specific affordable housing need or needs being addressed by the Targeted Fund.
§ 161.38 Political subdivision. The term *political subdivision* includes any subdivision of a public unit, any principal department of such public unit: ( a ) The creation of which subdivision or department has been expressly authorized by state statute,
( b ) To which some functions of government have been delegated by state statute, and
( c ) To which funds have been allocated by statute or ordinance for its exclusive use and control. It also includes drainage, irrigation, navigation, improvement, levee, sanitary, school or power districts and bridge or port authorities and other special districts created by state statute or compacts between the states. Excluded from the term are subordinate or nonautonomous divisions, agencies or boards within principal departments.
#### § 1807.901 Payment of funds.

CMF Awards provided pursuant to this part may be provided in a lump sum payment or in some other manner, as determined appropriate by the CDFI Fund. The CDFI Fund shall not provide any Payment under this part until a Recipient has satisfied all conditions set forth in the applicable NOFA and Assistance Agreement.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of IR BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/S/ JOHN N. FERMANIS
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Samuel Leon Alvarado

# 									Samuel Leon Alvarado							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

Samuel Leon Alvarado is a fentanyl trafficker for the Sinaloa Cartel engaged in the movement of vast quantities of fentanyl from Mexico into the U.S. in pill and powder form.

Between Approximately 2017 and Approximately 2021, Ovidio Guzman Lopez, Samuel Leon Alvarado and another co-conspirator, worked with a third co-conspirator (CC-1), who was based in the U.S., to maintain multiple premises in the Los Angeles metropolitan area for the storage and wholesale distribution of the Sinaloa Cartel’s fentanyl sourced from the Chapitos.  In total, Ovidio Guzman Lopez, Leon Alvarado, and the other co-conspirator sent approximately 80 kilograms of fentanyl to CC-1 in the U.S. for storage and distribution.  CC-1 sold some of the fentanyl locally in Los Angeles, and using commercial parcel carriers, shipped fentanyl to, among other places, Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Samuel Leon Alvarado and others charging them with engaging in a Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Samuel Leon Alvarado.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
#### § 19.17 Collateral attacks on adjudicatory proceeding.

If an interlocutory appeal or collateral attack is brought in any court concerning all or any part of an adjudicatory proceeding, the challenged adjudicatory proceeding will continue without regard to the pendency of that court proceeding. No default or other failure to act as directed in the adjudicatory proceeding within the times prescribed in this subpart will be excused based on the pendency before any court of any interlocutory appeal or collateral attack.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  DHB  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the year ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Dawn Schlegel,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 2, 2005                            By: /s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
                                                   ___________________________
                                                       Dawn M. Schlegel
                                                       Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 95016          Scale: 1,000,000          Edition: 8          Edition Date: 16-DEC-95          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1996/13**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 22, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 22, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0128. EDWARD GRECO v. TALON MERCHANT, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV311093
§ 1252.2 Effective duration. This part shall be in effect for each Enterprise so long as— ( a ) This part has not been superseded through amendment, and
( b ) The Enterprise remains subject to the terms and obligations of the respective Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.
§ 1234.15 Qualifying commercial real estate loans. ( a ) *General exception.* Commercial real estate loans that are securitized through a securitization transaction shall be subject to a 0 percent risk retention requirement under subpart B of this part, provided that the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The CRE assets meet the underwriting standards set forth in § 1234.17;
( 2 ) The securitization transaction is collateralized solely by CRE loans and by servicing assets;
( 3 ) The securitization transaction does not permit reinvestment periods; and
( 4 ) The sponsor provides, or causes to be provided, to potential investors a reasonable period of time prior to the sale of asset-backed securities of the issuing entity, and, upon request, to the Commission, and to the FHFA, in written form under the caption “Credit Risk Retention” a description of the manner in which the sponsor determined the aggregate risk retention requirement for the securitization transaction after including qualifying CRE loans with 0 percent risk retention.
( b ) *Risk retention requirement.* For any securitization transaction described in paragraph (a) of this section, the percentage of risk retention required under § 1234.3(a) is reduced by the percentage evidenced by the ratio of the unpaid principal balance of the qualifying CRE loans to the total unpaid principal balance of CRE loans that are included in the pool of assets collateralizing the asset-backed securities issued pursuant to the securitization transaction (the qualifying asset ratio); provided that; ( 1 ) The qualifying asset ratio is measured as of the cut-off date or similar date for establishing the composition of the securitized assets collateralizing the asset-backed securities issued pursuant to the securitization transaction;
( 2 ) If the qualifying asset ratio would exceed 50 percent, the qualifying asset ratio shall be deemed to be 50 percent; and
( 3 ) The disclosure required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section also includes descriptions of the qualifying CRE loans and descriptions of the CRE loans that are not qualifying CRE loans, and the material differences between the group of qualifying CRE loans and CRE loans that are not qualifying loans with respect to the composition of each group's loan balances, loan terms, interest rates, borrower credit information, and characteristics of any loan collateral.
( c ) *Exception for securitizations of qualifying CRE only.* Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the risk retention requirements of subpart B of this part shall not apply to securitization transactions where the transaction is collateralized solely by servicing assets and qualifying CRE loans.
( d ) Record maintenance. A regulated entity must retain the disclosures required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and the certification required in § 1234.17(a)(10) of this part, in its records until three years after all ABS interests issued in the securitization are no longer outstanding. The regulated entity must provide the disclosures and certifications upon request to the Commission and the FHFA.
[79 FR 77765, Dec. 24, 2014]
1

13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6

Source: USDOI-BLM, 2007 

F i s h 

C r e e k 

T i n g m

i a

k s

i q v i k R i v e r 

K i k i a k r o r a k 

R i v e r 

K o g o s u k r u k 

R i v e r 

A R C T I C O C E A N 

Kogru River 

J u d y

Cr e e k 

Mi g uakiak R. 

Boundary 

Are

a

S

p

e

c

ai l

R

vi er

Colville 

12 11 10

3 12 11 10

3 2 1 W 7 6 5 4

1 W 1 E 

8 

2 2 

9 

3 

3 4

5 4

5 

1 

1 E 

6 

2 2 

7 

3 3 

8 

4 4 

9 

5 

12 

11 

14 

10 

15 N 

13 

8 

4 

1 S 

5 

7 

3 

2 

6 

6 

2 

3 

7 

5 

4 

C o l v i l l e 

I k p i k p 

u

k 

R

v

H a r r i s

n 

B

a

u

al 

L

a

9 N 

1 W 

i

e r 

R

i

v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

o

y 

Pitt Point 

Cape Simpson 

Sm i t h B a y 

B e a u f o r t S e a 

T e s h e k p u k L a k e 

Te

s

h

e

k

p k 

S

p

e

ci

B

o

u

n

d

ary

Area 

ke 

F E 

A B 

G 

D

C 

ALTERNATIVE D 

0 6 12 18

Miles 

Teshe kpuk Lake : De fe r ed f ro m Le asin g; P er ma nent oil a nd gas fa cil it ie spr oh ibi te d onsho re w it hi n1 /4 m il e (S ti pul at ion K -3 ) 

River: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of essential pipelines 

and roads, generally prohibited within 3 miles (Stipulaiton K-1) 

River: Permanenet oil and gas facilities, with the exception of essential pipelines 

and roads, generally prohibited within 1 mile (Stipulation K-1) 

River: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of essential pipelines 

and roads, generally prohibited within 3/4 mile (Stipulaiton K-1) 

River: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of essential pipelines 

and roads, generally prohibited within 1/2 mile (Stipulaiton K-1) 

Coastal Area: Special restrictions on facility development within 3/4 mile of coast

(Stipulation K-6) 

Deep Water Lakes: Permanent oil and gas facilities generally prohibited in and within

1/4 mile of other lakes (Stipulations K-2) 

Teshekpuk Lake: Deferred from leasing; Permanent oil and gas facilities prohibited 

onshore within 1/4 mile of Teshekpuk Lake (Stipulation K-3) 

Teshekpuk Lake Caribou Habitat Area 

Facility Location Study Area (See Map 2-5) 

Goose Molting Area Lakes: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of pipelines, prohibited (Stipulation K-4) 

Goose Molting Area 

Lease Tracts with Surface Occupancy Limited to a Maximum of 300 Acres per Block 

Pik Dunes: Surface structures, except approximately perpendicular pipeline crossings

and ice pads, are prohibited (Stipulation K-8) 

Unavailable for Leasing: Native Corporation Subsurface and Surface 

Areas with Additional Oil and Gas Leasing Conditions 

Southern Caribou Calving Area: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of

pipelines, prohibited (Stipulation K-10)

Caribou Movement Corridors: Permanent oil and gas facilities, with the exception of pipelines, prohibited (Stipulation K-9) 

Available for Leasing with "General Stipulations and ROPs" only 

Map 2-4. Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Alternative D
Exhibit 10.1

 

MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD

2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT NO. 1

 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated May 12, 2012 (the “2012 Plan”), sponsored by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Bermuda (the “Company”), shall become effective as of this 30th day of March 2015.

 

SECTION 1.  Definitions.  Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.

 

SECTION 2.  Amendment.  Section 2(s) of the 2012 Plan is replaced in its entirety with the following:

 

“Good Reason” (i) shall have the meaning set forth in the applicable Award Agreement or (ii) if not defined in an applicable Award Agreement, shall have the meaning set forth in any employment or service agreement between the Participant and the Company or any of its Affiliates or (iii) if not defined in an Award Agreement, employment or service agreement pursuant to this Section 2(s), shall mean (A) for Participants who were subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act immediately prior to the Change in Control, a material diminution in the Participant’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities in effect prior to the Change in Control, (B) a material decrease in a Participant’s annual rate of base salary or total direct target compensation opportunity (base salary plus target annual incentive compensation plus target long-term incentive compensation) or (C) a relocation of such Participant’s principal place of employment by more than fifty miles from the location at which such Participant is then principally employed (or in the case of a Participant located in Bermuda, a relocation of such Participant’s place of employment from Bermuda), in each case, without the consent of the Participant.

 

SECTION 3.  Effect of this Amendment.  Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, this Amendment shall have no effect on any of the Company’s rights or obligations under the Plan or any Award granted thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed, effective as of March 30, 2015.

 

	
 
    	
MONTPELIER   RE HOLDINGS LTD.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Christopher L. Harris
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:    President and CEO