alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LB-^RTMENT OF 

'EstaSCisfied: 1802 

Tozm ofMassem, 9\[ezu 7orl<^^§^ 

ZOiOl'GV 1 5 P U:0 1 

ImmHatL 315-769-3588 

60 Main Street (!Fajd 315-769-0578 

!Massena, 0^iu'yor((^1366Z fittp://wzvzo.masseTmxvorl(;s.a)m/totun/indej(.asp 

November 15, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVaney, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

W86 308,1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: DOT-OST-1997-2842 

Proposal for Cape Air to Provide Subsidized Essential Air Service for Massena, New York 

Dear Mr. DeVaney: 

On behalf of the Town of Massena and its Town Council, I am writing to comment on the second round 

of proposals submitted for our Essential Air Service contract which expired in September. On November 

10, 2010, the Massena Town Council voted by a margin of 4-1 to support the Option 3 proposal from 

Cape Air. 

It is our belief that Massena will be best served by the Cape Air proposal to provide service to Albany 

with a connecting flight to Boston. While we were intrigued by the competing proposals from two other 

bidders, there was a significant level of uncertainty with both of those proposals. 

The Town Council has been impressed with Cape Air's service and reliability during its initial contract to 

provide EAS to our community. This service is indeed "essential" for communities like ours that find 

themselves located prohibitive distances from medium and large airline hubs. 

The DOT is to be commended for assisting in securing Cape Air to provide Massena's present EAS after 

the failure of Big Sky Airlines left us with no service a few years ago. Cape Air's presence and service was 

a welcome relief to travelers who were faced with the prospect of traveling 70 to 100 miles to board an 

airplane. We thank both Cape Air and your agency for coming to our assistance at that time. 

Now we look to enter a new chapter with EAS and Cape Air. 
I , 

The Town Council is pleased that the DOT takes our opinion into consideration in this process. We are 

also confident that DOT's oversight and due diligence will ensure that whoever is awarded the EAS 

contract for Massena has adequate business resources to prevent any future interruption of our air 

service. 

The EAS program is a wonderful example of how the federal government can have a direct impact on 

the American public by providing services at the local level. We are thankful it exists and we hope it will 

continue for many more years. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter or the Town Council's stance on these EAS 

proposals, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Joseph D. Gray, Supervisor 

Town of Massena
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby  given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and  552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Instruments and Devices for the Neonatal Intensive Care Units.                    

*Date:*                         November 2, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute, of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, 301-435-6889.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan  Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 25, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23725 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING
ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Gaming
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I DeAnn Moore, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and



(2)  the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/DeAnn MooreDeAnn MooreSecretary/Treasurer

March 17, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR 3RD QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Apr-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                Jan-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,663
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,816
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   26,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                          24,717
<COMMON>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     26,997
<SALES>                                           1,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,871
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    848
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
                                            

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.5


Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer of Barings Private Credit Corporation


pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,


as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Jonathan Bock, as Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barings Private Credit Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


/s/ JONATHAN BOCKJonathan BockCo-Chief Executive OfficerApril 29, 2022
# Official Journal L 73/18 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4818 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 73

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4818 March 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | 2005/204/EC:Decision No 199 of 13 October 2004 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 300 series) (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

2005/204/EC:Decision No 199 of 13 October 2004 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 300 series) (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance and for the EU/Switzerland Agreement |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance and for the EU/Switzerland Agreement

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Before Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Conlan, J.

#### Elihu B. Frost, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, v. The Weehawken Wharf Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint. Norman G. Johnson, for appellant; wilder & Anderson (Frederick E. Anderson, of counsel), for respondent. Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

No opinion.
§ 78.45 Suicide prevention services: Outreach. ( a ) Grantees providing or coordinating the provision of outreach must use their best efforts to ensure that eligible individuals, including those who are at highest risk of suicide or who are not receiving health care or other services furnished by VA, and their families are identified, engaged, and provided suicide prevention services.
( b ) Outreach must include active liaison with local VA facilities; State, local, or tribal government (if any); and private agencies and organizations providing suicide prevention services to eligible individuals and their families in the area to be served by the grantee.
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

 No. 04-51087

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

LUIS ROBERTO TOVAR-MARTINEZ, also known as Francisco

Calderon-Juarez, also known as Emilio Gomez-Perez

 Defendant - Appellant

 _____________________

 

 No. 04-51088

 _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

LUIS ROBERTO TOVAR-MARTINEZ, also known as Francisco

Calderon-Juarez

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

 for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-886)

(04-CR-1439)

---------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

_______________

*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand the case to the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso Division for resentencing is

granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed

alternative motion to extend time to file the Appellee’s brief

until fourteen (14) days from the Court’s denial of the

Appellee’s motion to vacate and motion to remand is denied as

moot.
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1289

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Jose Alfonso Castaneda-Villa, also *

known as David Robert Escarpita, * [PUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 23, 2003

 Filed: September 30, 2003

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Alfonso Castaneda-Villa (Castaneda) pleaded guilty to conspiring to

distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture

containing methamphetamine and 5 kilograms or more of a mixture containing

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. At sentencing, Castaneda contended that the

recent revision to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(3) was unclear, and urged the district court1

to limit his base offense level to 30. The court construed Castaneda’s argument as an
-2-

objection to the presentence report (PSR) and overruled it, and sentenced him to 70

months imprisonment followed by 5 years supervised release. Castaneda appeals,

reasserting his sentencing argument.

As amended in November 2002, section 2D1.1(a)(3) prescribes the base

offense level for a drug offense as that specified in the drug quantity table, “except

that if the defendant receives an adjustment under § 3B1.2 (Mitigating Role), the base

offense level under this subsection shall be not more than level 30.” After careful

review of the record, we find that the district court did not err in sentencing

Castaneda as Castaneda stipulated in his plea agreement that he was not eligible for

a mitigating-role reduction, and unobjected-to statements in the PSR support such a

finding. See United States v. Charles, 209 F.3d 1088, 1089-90 (8th Cir. 2000)

(standard of review); United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995)

(defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may

not challenge that punishment on appeal); United States v. Beatty, 9 F.3d 686, 690

(8th Cir. 1993) (district court may accept as true all unobjected-to factual statements

in PSR).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
Before Truax, P. J., and Dugro, J.

#### Albert Borrill, Appellant, v. Minnie Barton, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan. William Henry Knox, for appellant; G. A. C. Barnett, for respondent. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

No opinion.
#### § 1212.4 Waiver.

At the written request of a senior examiner or former senior examiner, the Director may waive the post-employment restriction in § 1212.3 if he or she certifies, in writing, and on a case-by-case basis, that granting a waiver of such restriction does not affect the integrity of the supervisory program of FHFA.
# Official Journal C 372/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 372 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5810 November 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 372

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5810 November 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 372/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 372/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 372/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7816 — EGP/F2i/JV) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2015/C 372/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7778 — Vattenfall/ENGIE/GASAG) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 372/4 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 372/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7816 — EGP/F2i/JV) (
  1
  )

1

2

2015/C 372/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7778 — Vattenfall/ENGIE/GASAG) (
  1
  )

1

3

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 372/4

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIA MEI CHEN,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72838

Agency No. A088

- 276

- 541

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2016 **

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges.

Xia Mei Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 2 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidenc e the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse

credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590

F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

S ubstantial evidence supports th e agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the IJ’s negative demeanor finding and on Chen’s internally inconsistent

testimony as to the circumstances of her release from detention. See Shrestha , 590

F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility finding rea sonable under the totality of the

circumstances) ; Huang v. Holder , 744 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir. 2014) (“The need

for deference [to agency credibility determinations] is particularly strong in the

context of demeanor assessments.”)

. Chen’s explanations do not compel a

contrary result. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). S ubstantial

evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that, even if Chen is Christian, she

failed to establish a well

- founded fear of future persecution in China

. See Gu v.

Gonzales , 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner failed to present

compelling evidence of a well

- founded fear of future persecution).

Because Chen failed to establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily failed

to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Huang , 744 F.3d at 1156.3

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Chen failed to show it is more likely than not that she would be tortured

by or with the co nsent or acquiescence of the Chinese government. See id. at

1156.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# S

# TATE O

# F 

# NEVAD A jim Gibbons, Governor

E ..,RONMENTAL PROTECTION DlVlSlON OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Leo M. Drozdofi PE., Administrator protecting the future for generations February 18,2010 Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator ORA-1, USEPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street SanFrancisco CA 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: On behalf of Governor Gibbons, as his appointed designee, this letter transmits to you two hard copies and one electronic copy of a replacement for a portion of Appendix A of the 

### Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 

### (RH SIP). The 

### RH SIP was submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on IUovember 18, 2009. This replacement package provides evidence of public participation and adoption for a proposed regulation submitted with the 

### RH SIP last November. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection requests that the EPA replace the contents page and section A.l of Appendix A of Nevada's 

### RH SIP with the material in today's submittal. Theenclosed submittal includes: A new contents page; A copy of the BART regulation revision which became effective on January 28,2010; Evidence of adoption and public participationin the adoption process. If you have any questions about this submittal or require additional clarification, please contact Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau ofAir Quality Planning at (775) 687-9359. Sincerely,

Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E. Administrator Enclosure
cc: Robin Reedy, Chief of Staff, Office ofthe Governor Allen Biaggi, Director, DCNR Colleen Cripps, Deputy Administrator, NDEP Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP 

### ,.--. Thomas Webb, Air Division (AIR-2), EPA Region IX Eleanor Kaplan, Air Division (AIR-2), EPA Region IX Certified MailNo. 7008 114000044029 43 16
90 1 S. Stewart Street, Suite 400 1 Carson City, Nevada 8970 1 p: 775.687.4670 f: 775.687.5856 www.ndep.nv.gov printed on recycled paper