alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021430EN.01000601.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 October 2021

(2021/C 430/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1630 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84370 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9748 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0668 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,655 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 363,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5975 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9454 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,1830 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5510 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0412 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6257 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5669 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 368,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0626 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4337 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5265 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 500,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8265 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,084 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 81,8586 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,763 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6304 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5402 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,0740 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1630

JPY

Japanese yen

132,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84370

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9748

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0668

ISK

Iceland króna

150,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,655

HUF

Hungarian forint

363,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5975

RON

Romanian leu

4,9454

TRY

Turkish lira

11,1830

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5510

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0412

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6257

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5669

KRW

South Korean won

1 368,39

ZAR

South African rand

17,0626

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4337

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5265

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 500,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8265

PHP

Philippine peso

59,084

RUB

Russian rouble

81,8586

THB

Thai baht

38,763

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6304

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5402

INR

Indian rupee

87,0740

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Lafayette Square Empire BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Seren Tahiroglu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2022By:/s/ Seren TahirogluSeren TahirogluChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7142

BRUCE RICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusM. E. RAY, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, ESTILL, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-120-6) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bruce Rice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We recently upheld the Bureau of Prisons’ policy of denying a sentence reduction under 18U.S.C.A. § 3621(e) (West Supp. 1998) to a prisoner serving a sentence for felony possession of a firearm. See Pelissero v. United States , ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 559663, at *3-6 (4th Cir. Sept. 3, 1998) (No. 97-6156). Rice currently is incarcerated pursuant to a conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Under Pelissero , he is not entitled to the sentence reduction contemplated by § 3621(e)(2)(B). We therefore affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 45-2008]


Foreign-Trade Zone 72--Indianapolis, IN; Termination of Review of 
Application for Subzone GETRAG Transmission Manufacturing LLC 
(Automotive Transmissions), Tipton, IN

    Notice is hereby given of termination of review of an application 
submitted by the Indianapolis Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 72, 
requesting special-purpose subzone status for the automotive 
transmission manufacturing plant of GETRAG Transmission Manufacturing 
LLC, located in Tipton, Indiana. The application was filed on August 8, 
2008 (73 FR 48194, 8-18-08).
    The termination is a result of changed circumstances, and the case 
has been closed without prejudice.

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Pierre V. Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23697 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2683 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2683

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to require in the annual report of each defined benefit pension plan 
             disclosure of plan investments in hedge funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2007

  Mr. Castle (for himself and Mr. Mahoney of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to require in the annual report of each defined benefit pension plan 
             disclosure of plan investments in hedge funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pension Security Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE IN ANNUAL REPORT OF INVESTMENTS IN HEDGE FUNDS BY 
              DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(b) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1023(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ``value;'' and 
        inserting ``value, including, in the case of a defined benefit 
        pension plan, a separate schedule identifying each hedge fund 
        (as defined in paragraph 5)) in which amounts held for 
        investment under the plan are invested as of the end of the 
        plan year covered by the annual report and the amount so 
        invested in such hedge fund;''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) For purposes of paragraph (3)(C), the term `hedge fund' means 
an unregistered investment pool permitted under sections 3(c)(1) and 
3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1), 
(7)) and section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d(2)) 
and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(17 CFR 230.506).''.
    (b) Effective Date; Regulations.--The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall apply with respect to annual reports for plan years beginning 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of 
Labor, in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
shall issue initial regulations to carry out the amendments made by 
subsection (a) not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.60 Definition of “living with”.

For the purposes of determining entitlement to pension under 38 U.S.C. 1521, a person shall be considered as living with his or her spouse even though they reside apart unless they are estranged.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1521(h)(2))

[44 FR 45935, Aug. 6, 1979]
#### § 1073.205 No requirement for duplicate notice.

Where the Director previously has given a debtor any of the required notice and review opportunities with respect to a particular debt, the Director is not required to duplicate such notice and review opportunities prior to initiating administrative offset.
Exhibit 11-1
 THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  ($ and shares in thousands, except per share data)
 Three Months Ended
    
    
    Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008Net income applicable to common stock
    
    $
    23,650
    
    
    $
    17,421
    
    
    $
    35,650
    
    
    $
    40,671Average number of common shares outstanding
    
    
    16,938
    
    
    
    16,773
    
    
    
    16,910
    
    
    
    16,817Net income per share  Basic
    
    $
    1.40
    
    
    $
    1.04
    
    
    $
    2.11
    
    
    $
    2.42Average number of common shares outstanding
    
    
    16,938
    
    
    
    16,773
    
    
    
    16,910
    
    
    
    16,817Add: Assumed exercise of stock options and vesting
of stock grants
    
    
    55
    
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    185Common and common equivalent shares outstanding
    
    
    16,993
    
    
    
    16,912
    
    
    
    17,010
    
    
    
    17,002Net income per share  Diluted
    
    $
    1.39
    
    
    $
    1.03
    
    
    $
    2.10
    
    
    $
    2.39
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2659

KAREN SNELL, by and through her parents and

guardians, Lillian and Stephen Snell,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES W. BUFFINGTON; DOYLE R. MYERS; GEORGE J.

BROWN; GERALD BOARMAN; JOHN CESCHINI,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

THE PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION;

CATHERINE M. BURCH; MARY C. CANAVAN; THOMAS R.

HENDERSHOT; VERNA P. TEASDALE; FREDERICK C.

HUTCHINSON; SUZANNE K. PLOUGMAN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-93-1184-AW)

Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Matt P. Lavine, College Park, Maryland, for Appellant. Sheldon L.

Gnatt, Roger C. Thomas, REICHELT, NUSSBAUM, LAPLACA & MILLER,

Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Karen Snell appeals the district court's order granting a directed verdict for the Defendants in her civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). Snell, a high school student at the time

of the incidents involved, filed this suit alleging that the Defendants violated her constitutional rights by imposing a disciplinary

suspension as a result of her admitted involvement with an unauthorized student publication. The district court concluded that

Snell had failed to produce sufficient evidence to prevail on her

First Amendment claim or her Fourth Amendment claim and that in any

event the Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.

This Court will uphold the district court's entry of a directed verdict if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable

to the non-moving party, there could be only "`one reasonable

conclusion as to the verdict'" under the applicable law. Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Co., 993 F.2d 417, 420 (4th Cir. 1993) (quoting

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986)). Substantially for the reasons set forth by the district court, we

affirm. See Snell v. The Prince George's County Board of Education, No. AW-93-1184 (D.Md. Aug. 11, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 101

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2595

[Report No. 108–197] 

To restore the operation of the Native American Veteran Housing Loan 

Program during fiscal year 2003 to the scope of that program as in 

effect on September 30, 2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2003

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. RENZI, and Mr. 

UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

JULY 10, 2003

Additional sponsors: Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. CASE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. 

MICHAUD, and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA

JULY 10, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To restore the operation of the Native American Veteran 

Housing Loan Program during fiscal year 2003 to the 

scope of that program as in effect on September 30, 

2002.
2

•HR 2595 RH 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN 

4 HOUSING LOAN PROGRAM. 

5 (a) RESTORATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 TO FIS6 CAL YEAR 2002 LEVEL.—In carrying out the pilot pro7 gram provided by subchapter V of chapter 37 of title 38, 

8 United States Code, under which the Secretary of Vet9 erans Affairs is authorized to make direct housing loans 

10 to Native American veterans, the Secretary shall during 

11 fiscal year 2003 carry out that program without regard 

12 to the proviso under the heading ‘‘Native American Vet13 eran Housing Loan Program Account’’ in title I of the 

14 Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 

15 Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 

16 Act, 2003 (division K of Public Law 108–7; 117 Stat. 

17 476), and such proviso shall be treated as being of no force 

18 or effect. 

19 (b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Any action taken by the 

20 Secretary of Veterans Affairs before the enactment of this 

21 Act that is inconsistent with the proviso referred to in sub22 section (a) is hereby ratified with respect to such incon23 sistency. 

Union Calendar No. 101

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2595

[Report No. 108–197] 

A BILL

To restore the operation of the Native American 

Veteran Housing Loan Program during fiscal year 2003 to the scope of that program as in effect on September 30, 2002. 

JULY 10, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Revocation of License Granted for Dan Gertler

# 									Revocation of License Granted for Dan Gertler							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

March 8, 2021

Today, the Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, revoked the license that was issued to Specially Designated National Dan Gertler on January 15, 2021.

The license previously granted to Mr. Gertler is inconsistent with America’s strong foreign policy interests in combatting corruption around the world, specifically including U.S. efforts to counter corruption and promote stability in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). As the original designation of Mr. Gertler under the Global Magnitsky sanctions program in 2017 and subsequent designations in 2018 made clear, Mr. Gertler engaged in extensive public corruption. Under our Privileged Partnership for Peace and Prosperity, the United States stands firmly with our partners in the DRC to counter malign behavior that undermines the country’s institutions and economic opportunities.

The United States will continue to promote accountability for corrupt actors with all the tools at our disposal, in order to advance democracy, uphold international norms, and impose tangible costs on those who seek to upend them.

 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsCorruptionDemocratic Republic of the CongoOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsPeaceStabilization

Back to Top
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

t1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143513

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143513 COA: 303579 Oakland CC: 2009-227588-FC VALENTINO DEVINE BENNETT, 2009-227589-FC Defendant-Appellant. 2009-227553-FC 2009-227554-FC

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
e Millennium Challenge Corporation is a U.S. Government agency designed to work with some of the poorest countries in the world. 

Established in January , MCC’s mission is to reduce poverty through the promotion of sustainable economic growth. Before a country 

can become eligible to receive assistance, MCC looks at their performance on  independent and transparent policy indicators. Countries 

that perform well on the indicators may be considered eligible for Compact Assistance.

Millennium

Challenge

Corporation

Reducing Poverty Through Growth

Issue Brief

MCC and Mutual Accountability

Mutual accountability is a key principle of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, and is the idea that donors 

and partners should hold each other responsible for development results and be transparent in the use of development resources. The Paris Declaration commitments in this area call upon donors to provide transparent, 

comprehensive information on their aid flows so that partner countries can plan and budget, as well as to assess 

with partner countries country-level progress on the Paris Declaration.

MCC performs well on the mutual accountability commitments of the Paris Declaration. It commits all funding 

in full when a “compact,” or grant agreement, is signed, so partner countries know exactly how much they can 

expect to receive over the life of the compact. MCC also requires that anticipated disbursements for compact 

activities be on-budget wherever possible – that is, reflected in partner countries’national budget documents. 

To help make this feasible, MCC asks partner countries to have a single accounting classification system in place 

to categorize compact activities that mirrors or can easily be converted over to and understood by the national 

budget system. 

MCC also requires that all actual MCC disbursements be included in national financial accounts. The “accountable entities” our partner countries designate to manage and implement their compacts also make information 

publicly available quarterly, such as financial information, procurement notices and awarded procurements, etc...

MCC holds itself accountable by reporting all compact disbursements to Congress on a quarterly basis and by 

making quarterly compact development and implementation status reports available on MCC’s external website. 

On the commitment requiring donors and partner countries to use existing mechanisms to mutually assess their 

performance on the Paris Declaration commitments, MCC has been active in each of the two Monitoring 

the Paris Declaration survey rounds. MCC staff also participate in existing country- and sector-level joint and 

annual review fora and government-donor working groups, where both policy issues and performance on aid 

effectiveness are discussed. MCC supports this commitment and believes that, rather than establishing new 

domestic or even international mutual accountability mechanisms as some have proposed, it should rationalize 

and improve the numerous country-level mechanisms already in existence. 

August 2008
# L_2008320EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 320/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 320/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
§ 1236.3 Prudential standards as regulations or guidelines. ( a ) *Form.* As expressly authorized by 12 U.S.C. 4513b(a), FHFA may establish Standards as regulations or guidelines.
( b ) *Standards established as guidelines.* Each Standard that has been established as a guideline is located in the appendix to this part. FHFA will provide public notice of, and seek public comment on, any Standard it plans to establish as a guideline, or on any material modification to any Standard established as a guideline. FHFA may revoke any Standard established as a guideline at any time by order or notice. Standards established as guidelines are subject to the remedial provisions of §§ 1236.4 and 1236.5.
( c ) *Standards established as regulations.* When establishing a Standard as a regulation or amending such a Standard, FHFA shall follow applicable rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, 12 U.S.C. 553. Standards established as regulations may be set forth as subparts or provisions of this part; or as other parts or subparts, or as provisions of such other parts or subparts, of this chapter XII of title 12. When not set forth as a subpart of this part, the regulation or any provision thereof that is a Standard shall be identified as a Standard in the body of the regulation. Standards established as regulations are subject to this part, including the remedial provisions of §§ 1236.4 and 1236.5, and to the enforcement provisions of 12 U.S.C. chapter 46, subchapter III.
( d ) *Conflicts.* In the case of a direct conflict between a Standard established as a guideline and any FHFA regulation, when it is not possible to comply with both that Standard and the FHFA regulation, the FHFA regulation shall control.
[89 FR 3539, Jan. 19, 2024]