alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23909]



[[Page 51175]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,085]


Emerson Network Power, Embedded Computing, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers of QTI, Madison, WI; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on August 5, 2009, applicable to workers of Emerson Network Power, 
Embedded Computing, including on-site leased workers from QTI, Madison, 
Wisconsin. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the manufacturing of embedded computer products.
    The review shows that on July 30, 2007, a certification of 
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance was issued for all 
workers of Emerson Network Power, Embedded Computing Facility, Madison, 
Wisconsin, separated from employment on or after June 29, 2006 through 
July 30, 2009. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
August 14, 2007 (72 FR 45451).
    In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the 
Department is amending the May 18, 2008 impact date established for TA-
W-70,085, to read July 31, 2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,085 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Emerson Network Power, Embedded Computing, 
including on-site leased workers of QTI, Madison, Wisconsin, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
July 31, 2009, through August 5, 2011, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date 
of certification through two years from the date of certification, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of September 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-23909 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2023095EN.01002201.xml

| 14.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/22

---

Corrigendum to recruitment notice PE/281/S/FINS – Business analysts – SAP (AD 6 and AD 9)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 68 A of 24 February 2023
  )

(2023/C 95/12)

On page 4, in section B.1:

for:

‘NB: When applying online, candidates must specify the grade for which they are applying (AD 6 or AD 9). Candidates who apply for grade AD 9 must then upload their duly completed declaration form to the relevant section of the application. If no declaration is submitted or if the declaration is incomplete, the application will be inadmissible.
  ’,

read:

‘NB: When applying online, candidates must specify the grade for which they are applying (AD 6 or AD 9). All candidates must also upload their duly completed declaration form to the relevant section of the application. If candidates applying for grade AD 9 do not submit a declaration or if the declaration is incomplete, their application will be inadmissible.
  ’

---
# Official Journal C 277/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 277 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 667 August 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 277

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 667 August 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 277/01 | Euro exchange rates – 4 August 2023 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 277/01

Euro exchange rates – 4 August 2023

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 277/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11228 – BENTELER / BEIJING AUTOMOTIVE / JVs) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2023/C 277/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11228 – BENTELER / BEIJING AUTOMOTIVE / JVs) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1273.5 Funding of the OF. ( a ) *Generally.* The Banks are responsible for jointly funding all the expenses of the OF, including the costs of indemnifying the members of the OF board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer, and other officers and employees of the OF, as provided for in this part.
( b ) *Funding policies.* ( 1 ) At the direction of and pursuant to policies and procedures adopted by the OF board of directors, the Banks shall periodically reimburse the OF in order to maintain sufficient operating funds under the budget approved by the OF board of directors. The OF operating funds shall be: ( i ) Available for expenses of the OF and the OF board of directors, according to their approved budgets; and
( ii ) Subject to withdrawal by check, wire transfer or draft signed by the Chief Executive Officer or other persons designated by the OF board of directors.
( 2 ) Each Bank's respective *pro rata* share of the reimbursement described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be based on a reasonable formula approved by the OF board of directors. Such formula shall be subject to the review of FHFA, and the OF board of directors shall make any changes to the formula as may be ordered by FHFA from time to time.
( c ) *Alternative funding method.* With the prior approval of FHFA, the OF board of directors may, by contract with a Bank or Banks, choose to be reimbursed through a fee structure, in lieu of or in addition to assessment, for services provided to the Bank or Banks.
( d ) *Prompt reimbursement.* Each Bank from time to time shall promptly forward funds to the OF in an amount representing its share of the reimbursement described in paragraph (b) of this section when directed to do so by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the procedures of the OF board of directors.
( e ) *Indemnification expenses.* All expenses incident to indemnification of the members of the OF board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer, and other officers and employees of the OF shall be treated as an expense of the OF to be reimbursed by the Banks under the provisions of this part.
( f ) *Operating funds segregated.* Any funds received by the OF from the Banks pursuant to this section for OF operating expenses promptly shall be deposited into one or more accounts and shall not be commingled with any proceeds from the sale of consolidated obligations in any manner.
§ 1260.4 Timing and form of information distribution. ( a ) *Timing of distribution by FHFA.* FHFA may distribute information as provided in the notice issued under § 1260.2(b) after the expiration of the applicable time period specified in § 1260.3(b) unless, within that time period, the affected Bank has filed with FHFA a written request to withhold particular proprietary information that meets the requirements of § 1260.3(a). When a Bank has filed such a request, FHFA shall not distribute the information that is the subject of the request until the Director or his designee has made the determination and provided the notice required by § 1260.3(c) and shall distribute or withhold the subject information in conformity with that determination.
( b ) *Timing of distribution by Banks.* A Bank that is required to distribute information directly to the other Banks and the Office of Finance shall distribute that information at the time specified in the notice issued under § 1260.2(b) unless, within the time period specified in § 1260.3(b)(1)(iii), the Bank has submitted to FHFA a request to withhold particular proprietary information that meets the requirements of § 1260.3(a). If the Bank has filed such a request, it need not distribute the information that is the subject of the request until the Director or his designee has made the determination and provided the notice required by § 1260.3(c). Thereafter, the Bank shall distribute or withhold the subject information in conformity with that determination.
( c ) *Form.* FHFA may distribute information, or require a Bank to distribute information, under this part in either tangible or electronic form, as it deems appropriate.
#### Barret Goldberg et al., Respondents, *v.*Anna Shapiro et al., Appellants.

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs upon a trial had before the court, without a jury. Action for conversion.

*725Abraham A. Joseph, for appellants.

Leon Burkes (Isidor Wasservogel, of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The action is to recover damages for the conversion of twenty-one suits of clothing and other articles. Judgment was rendered against the defendants for $185 damages, together with costs and extra costs.

Although what seems to have been regarded as the value of such suits appears to have been taken into consideration by the justice in assessing the damages, the record fails to disclose any proof whatever that the same were ever in the possession or under the control of the defendants. Under these circumstances, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000793730
<NAME>                        NHP Retirement Housing Partners, I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4,321,081
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         63,996,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,168,469)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 55,966,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        42,622,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,353,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   55,966,753
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,840,757
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,030,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,509,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (901,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (901,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 264/25 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 264 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4825 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 264

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4825 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 264/1 | List of appointments made by the Council — July, August and September 2005 (social field) | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 264/2 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| 2005/C 264/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3876 — Diester Industrie/Bunge/JV) (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 264/4 | Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray and North Ronaldsay (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 264/5 | Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday (1) | 7 |
| 2005/C 264/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3949 — Shell/ERG/IONIO GAS JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 264/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3885 — Apax/Barclays/TFT/Somerfield) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 264/1

List of appointments made by the Council — July, August and September 2005 (social field)

1

Commission

2005/C 264/2

Euro exchange rates

4

2005/C 264/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3876 — Diester Industrie/Bunge/JV) (1)

5

2005/C 264/4

Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray and North Ronaldsay (1)

6

2005/C 264/5

Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday (1)

7

2005/C 264/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3949 — Shell/ERG/IONIO GAS JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

2005/C 264/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3885 — Apax/Barclays/TFT/Somerfield) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### WASHINGTON MARKET CO. v. UNITED STATES

[60 C. Cls. 930; 269 U. S. 571]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 19, 1925.
§ 1012.230 Suspension order pending amendments. A suspension pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) of § 1010.45 of this chapter shall be effected by service of a suspension order which shall contain: ( a ) An identification of the filing to which the order applies.
( b ) An identification of the amendment to the filing which generated the order.
( c ) A statement that the issuance of the order is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of purchasers.
( d ) A statement that the order shall remain in effect until the amendment becomes effective.
( e ) A notice of the hearing rights of the developer under § 1012.235 and of the procedure for invoking those rights.
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe shell company report of Marti Technologies, Inc. (formerly Galata Acquisition Corp.) on Form 20-F of our report dated March 31,2023, which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the ability of Galata Acquisition Corp. to continue as a going concern, with respectto our audits of the financial statements of Galata Acquisition Corp. as of December 31,2022 and 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the period from February 26, 2021 (inception) through December 31,2021, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Galata Acquisition Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2022. Wealso consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Statement of Experts” in the shell company report on Form 20-F.

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

Houston, Texas

July 14, 2023
# C_2021354EN.01000101.xml

| 3.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 September 2021

(2021/C 354/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1846 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85915 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1939 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0848 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2938 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,382 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 347,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5069 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9393 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,7942 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6038 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4944 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2075 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6702 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5921 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 372,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9882 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6503 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5010 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 874,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9256 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,039 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,2301 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,446 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1429 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,6529 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,5205 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1846

JPY

Japanese yen

130,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85915

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1939

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0848

ISK

Iceland króna

150,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2938

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,382

HUF

Hungarian forint

347,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5069

RON

Romanian leu

4,9393

TRY

Turkish lira

9,7942

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6038

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4944

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2075

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6702

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5921

KRW

South Korean won

1 372,66

ZAR

South African rand

16,9882

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6503

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5010

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 874,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9256

PHP

Philippine peso

59,039

RUB

Russian rouble

86,2301

THB

Thai baht

38,446

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1429

MXN

Mexican peso

23,6529

INR

Indian rupee

86,5205

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:53 PM

To: Robert Strieter

Cc: Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com

Subject: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0031-0017[1].pdf - Adobe Reader

I am working on the Primary Aluminum RTR and the Risk Assessment Group plans to 

re-run the risk 

models in December and I noticed in the comments that the Association did not want 

us to use a factor 

of 10 for the acute exposure factors. In the absence of data this is the default 

value that they typically 

use. Do you have any data that we can use to support your argument for the 4 to 6 

times the average 

instead? We would have to do an Acute Effects technical support document to go 

along with whatever 

standard we propose as to why we chose the 4 or 6 factor. Thanks. 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 

Mail Drop D243-02 

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207 

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
(4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 UWlJRRE'\CI'.')
• S'">'!l(I1 IDocket No. FA..

A-1009-0309; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-173-AD; Amendment 

## 1«>\5_ ;1.00'1- 2i<>-13 39-*****; AD  -** -**] R1N 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200. A330-300. A340-200. and A340-300 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lisle above. This AD results fTOm mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (1vlCAI) originated by an aviatiOll authority ofanother country to identify and correCl an unsafe condition on 3n aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Several cases have been rep0l1ed ofin-night loss oftiledrive strut fitting fromthe movable fairing oftlap track No.3. Consequently, the flap track No.3 fairing was detached from its aft end, and found hanging. lnvestigations have shown that the detachment ofthe an lower drive strut fitting fromthe fairing occurred due to the fourbonded inserts being pulled out. This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to in-flight loss ortile affee-ted aircraft parts, potentially resulting ininjuries topersons on the ground_ 

## .llrV.J.

UATh

N1TIAl"<"" ~./' •••••.

-A' 

# ~.- 

# ---- l>An OlJ1'lNGS\'''''OL
'i"",:":-[l'! '~ITl"'..

~~'(, /'"

rl

_ .~ ~m .•• I.S",(l 

### ~",'1l * 

### * * * * * 

### * 

## J~ I~. I We are issuing this AD to require actions tocorrect the unsafe condition on these
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6264

JOHN E. WALSH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-

2421-MJG)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Walsh, Appellant Pro Se. Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Walsh v. Smith, No.

CA-95-2421-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED