alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2688 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2688

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal authorities 
             relating to H1-B visas for temporary workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2003

 Mr. Tancredo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal authorities 
             relating to H1-B visas for temporary workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO H1-B VISAS FOR TEMPORARY 
              WORKERS.

    (a) Repeal of H1-B Provisions.--The Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended by striking section 
101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), section 212(n), section 214(c)(9), section 
214(c)(10), and section 286(s).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 214(c)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality 
        Act (8 U.S.C 1184(c)(5)(A)) is amended by striking 
        ``101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) or''.
            (2) Section 214(g)(1) (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)) is amended by 
        striking ``1992)--'' and all that follows through ``(B)'' and 
        inserting ``1992)''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 197/30 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 197 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5030 July 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 197

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5030 July 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2007/526/EC |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 18 June 2007 on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes
  (notified under document number C(2007) 2525)


   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

Commission

2007/526/EC

*

Commission Recommendation of 18 June 2007 on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes
  (notified under document number C(2007) 2525)


   (1)

(notified under document number C(2007) 2525)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 151.30 What requirements apply to all transactions?

You must effect all transactions, including transactions excepted under § 151.20, in a safe and sound manner. You must maintain effective systems of records and controls regarding your customers' securities transactions. These systems must clearly and accurately reflect all appropriate information and provide an adequate basis for an audit.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE

 EVOLENT HEALTH, INC. 2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) is made by Evolent Health Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), as of September 23,
2013. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Evolent Health, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 

WHEREAS, pursuant to (i) that certain Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among the Company, Evolent Health, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Evolent”) and Evolent Health LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and (ii) that certain Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among the Company and Evolent, the Company assumed Evolent’s rights
and obligations under the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the Company now maintains the Plan; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company reserves the authority to amend the Plan (the
“Board”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board and the stockholders of the Company have determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company to amend the Plan to provide for an increase in the maximum number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for issuance under the plan to 2,286,583 and have authorized said increase. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the foregoing, the Plan is amended as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

3.3 The grant of any Award shall be evidenced by the Grantee executing the appropriate Award Agreement. 

2. Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

4.1. Authorized Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 15, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock
that may be initially issued pursuant to the Plan is Two Million Two Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand Three Hundred Seventeen (2,285,317) shares. The total number of shares of Common Stock described in the preceding sentence shall be available for
issuance under Incentive Stock Options. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased on the open market or otherwise, all as determined by the Company from time
to time. No later than the end of the Transition Period, the maximum number of shares for each type of Stock- Based Award, and the maximum amount of cash for any cash-based Award, intended to constitute
“performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) granted to any 







 
Grantee in any specified period shall be established by the Company and approved by the Company’s stockholders. 

3. Except as modified by this Amendment, all the terms and provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, to record the adoption of this Amendment to the Plan, the Company has
caused the execution of this instrument on this 23rd day of September, 2013. 
  

			
	EVOLENT HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:		 /s/ Seth Blackley

			Name: Seth Blackley
			Title:   President


 [Signature Page to Amendment to Equity Incentive Plan]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4839

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CHARLES D. IZAC, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CR-02-58) Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: May 18, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Warren Bennett, Sicilia S. Chinn, BENNETT & LAWLOR, LLP, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Jeb T. Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles D. Izac, Jr. was indicted on one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a person previously convicted of a felony. Before trial, the Government filed a motion inlimine seeking to preclude Izac from presenting a justification defense. The district court initially denied the motion. The Government later renewed its motion, and after conducting a hearing the district court ruled that Izac did not meet the standard of proof required to present a justification defense. Izac then entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s ruling on the availability of the justification defense. The district court accepted the plea and sentenced Izac to 180 months’ imprisonment. Izac now appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion in limine . We recently held that a conditional guilty plea is not valid if it purports to preserve for appeal a non-case-dispositive issue. United States v. Bundy , 392 F.3d 641, 647 (4th Cir. 2004). The issue sought to be preserved for appeal in this case -- whether the defendant was entitled to present a justification defense -- is not case-dispositive. A favorable ruling for Izac would not necessarily result in dismissal of the charge against him; rather, such a ruling would merely allow him to make an additional argument at trial. See id. at 648. Accordingly, Izac’s purported conditional guilty plea is invalid.3 The record makes clear the parties’ understanding that Izac pled guilty only on the condition that he be permitted to appeal the district court’s ruling on the Government’s motion inlimine . Thus, we cannot say that Izac’s plea was unconditional. See id. at 649. “Because there is no valid plea -- conditional or unconditional -- to support the judgment of conviction, that judgment must be vacated” and the case remanded for further proceedings. Id. On remand, Izac must decide whether to enter another guilty plea or proceed to trial. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue has been authoritatively decided, and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). VACATED AND REMANDED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2714 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2714

              To reauthorize the State Justice Institute.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2003

Mr. Smith of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To reauthorize the State Justice Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Justice Institute 
Reauthorization Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 215 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10713) is amended to read as follows:

                   ``authorization of appropriations

    ``Sec. 215. There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
the purposes of this title, $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005, 
2006, 2007, and 2008. Amounts appropriated for each such year are to 
remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Status of Institute.--Section 205(c) of the State Justice 
Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(c)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Institute may purchase goods and services from the 
General Services Administration in order to carry out its functions.''.
    (b) Status as Officers and Employees of the United States.--Section 
205(d)(2) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10704(d)(2)) is amended by inserting ``, notwithstanding section 8914 
of such title'' after ``(relating to health insurance)''.
    (c) Meetings.--Section 204(j) of the State Justice Institute Act of 
1984 (42 U.S.C. 10703(j)) is amended by inserting ``(on any occasion on 
which that committee has been delegated the authority to act on behalf 
of the Board)'' after ``executive committee of the Board''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      21,482,173              13,156,998
<SECURITIES>                                 6,802,259                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,050,377              11,888,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,367,747                  88,848
<INVENTORY>                                 15,219,571               5,314,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,764,395              30,117,441
<PP&E>                                      39,763,329              23,274,008
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,327,475               1,531,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,422,344              60,307,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,538,334               6,981,079
<BONDS>                                      4,482,346               4,304,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    83,624,448              33,330,010
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,422,344              60,307,019
<SALES>                                     70,870,875              32,893,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            70,870,875              32,893,502
<CGS>                                       38,619,684              13,626,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,900,757              26,652,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,792,747                  88,848
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             481,383                  73,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,046,774               7,125,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,232,192               2,392,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,814,582               4,731,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,814,582               4,731,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29                     .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29                     .35


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                               95460
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         8154
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    190043
<PP&E>                                               20281
<DEPRECIATION>                                       12279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      199045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                59069
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              9047
<OTHER-SE>                                          125237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        199045
<SALES>                                             175857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    175857
<CGS>                                                45473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    539898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2056061
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (403145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    2459206
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       2056061
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.21



</TABLE>
# C_2023113EN.01003701.xml

| 28.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/37

---

Corrigendum to Public holidays 2023

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 39 of 1 February 2023
  )

(2023/C 113/14)

On page 20 in row 3:

for:

| Česká republika | 1.1, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12 |
| --- | --- |

Česká republika

1.1, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12

read:

| Česká republika | 1.1, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12 |
| --- | --- |

Česká republika

1.1, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12

---
#### Edward C. Amer et al., Respondents, *v.*John F. Folk et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered upon a verdict rendered by a jury, and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Hastings & Gleason (George S. Hastings, of counsel), for appellants.

Blumenstiel *&*Hirsch (Morris J. Hirsch, of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Conlan, Hascall and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          25,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,771
<INVENTORY>                                     47,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,698
<PP&E>                                         154,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,991
<BONDS>                                         86,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,851
<SALES>                                        458,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,893
<CGS>                                          372,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1282.61 General.

This subpart establishes data submission and reporting requirements to carry out the requirements of the Enterprises' Charter Acts and the Safety and Soundness Act.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2450 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 

of 2002 (Public Law 107–243). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2007 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107–243. 

4 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

5 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 50 U.S.C. 

6 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 26, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00440

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.T. JR. AND E.A.T., Children,

From the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01457 The Honorable Kimberly Burley , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court sig ned a final appealable order on September 18, 2021. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due by October 8, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P

. 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due by October 25,

2 021. See Tex. R. App. P . 26.3. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 11, 2021

— within the time allowed for filing a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appel lant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.

Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (con struing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id

.

Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed but within the fifteen

- day grace period,

we ORDER appellant to file a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner by November 5, 2021 . If appellant fails to respond within

the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this court.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of October, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court