alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
INCLUDED IN ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,316
<PP&E>                                          10,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,932
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,399
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,717
<SALES>                                         71,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,719
<CGS>                                           39,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,663
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.61
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12(b)**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)     The following table sets forth Lamar Media’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicted.                              YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (dollars in thousands) 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006 2007 Net income (loss) $(24,958) $(22,168) $24,219  $47,470  $45,232 $47,001 Income tax (benefit) expense  (12,434)  (12,338)  11,764   35,488   35,753  38,198 Fixed charges  139,376   126,245   116,409   137,889   171,686  224,932                   Earnings  101,984   91,739   152,392   220,847   252,671  310,131                   Interest expense, net  94,061   77,350   64,425   80,345   109,806  158,609 Rent under leases representativeof an interest factor (1/3)  45,315   48,895   51,984   57,544   61,880  66,323 Preferred dividends  0   0   0   0   0  0                   Fixed charges  139,376   126,245   116,409   137,889   171,686  224,932                   Ratio of earnings to fixedcharges(2)  0.7x   0.7x   1.3x   1.6x   1.5x  1.4x                    (1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earningsdivided by fixed charges. For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as netincome (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of achange in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges is defined as the sum ofinterest expenses, preferred stock dividends and the component of rental expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts. (2) For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $37.4 million and $34.5 million, respectively.
M. Anne Swanson 

+ l 202 776 2534 

aswanson@cooley .com 

June 3, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application for Amendment to Exemption 1111 OA, Trimble Navigation Limited 

FAA Docket 2014-0367 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

On May 19, 2015, Trimble Navigation Limited ("Trimble") submitted an amendment to 

add two aircraft to amended Exemption 1111 OA for commercial use in aerial data collection. 

The FAA issued Exemption 11110A on May 7, 2015. 

One of the two aircraft discussed in the amendment is the "Trimble UX3." Trimble has 

now renamed that craft the 'Trimble ZX5." By this letter, Trimble hereby requests that every 

reference to the "UX3" in the May 19, 2015 filing, including in the separately filed manuals, now 

be read to refer instead to the "ZX5." 

We believe this request to be ministerial in nature, but please advise us if other 

procedures are preferred. If you have any other questions, please contact us. /"~t 

VeryA~uly/yours, / · 

11,\()// 

r~f ;A.nne Swanson 

Counsel for Trimble Navigation Limited 

cc: Robert Pappas 

Thuy Cooper 

Jake Troutman 

Dean Griffith 

James Kirkland 

Kyle Gilbertson 

Jonathan Hill 

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM
#### § 1403.12 Exemptions.

*Specific.* Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes in the following system of records is exempt from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G), (H), and (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and from the provisions of this part:

Personnel Security Files—FCSIC.
§ 1222.24 Ownership limitations for State-registered appraisal management companies. ( a ) *Appraiser certification or licensing of owners.* ( 1 ) An AMC subject to State registration pursuant to § 1222.23 shall not be registered by a State or included on the AMC National Registry if such AMC, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, is owned by any person who has had an appraiser license or certificate refused, denied, cancelled, surrendered in lieu of revocation, or revoked in any State for a substantive cause, as determined by the appropriate State appraiser certifying and licensing agency.
( 2 ) An AMC subject to State registration pursuant to § 1222.23 is not barred by paragraph (a)(1) of this section from being registered by a State or included on the AMC National Registry if the license or certificate of the appraiser with an ownership interest was not revoked for a substantive cause and has been reinstated by the State or States in which the appraiser was licensed or certified.
( b ) *Good moral character of owners.* An AMC shall not be registered by a State if any person that owns more than 10 percent of the AMC— ( 1 ) Is determined by the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency not to have good moral character; or
( 2 ) Fails to submit to a background investigation carried out by the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency.
#### § 18b.65 Appeals from ruling of presiding officer.

Rulings of the presiding officer may not be appealed to the reviewing authority prior to consideration of the entire proceeding except with the consent of the presiding officer and where the reviewing authority certifies on the record or in writing that the allowance of an interlocutory appeal is clearly necessary to prevent exceptional delay, expense, or prejudice to any party, or substantial detriment to the public interest. If an appeal is allowed, any party may file a brief with the reviewing authority within such period as the presiding officer directs. No oral argument will be heard unless the reviewing authority directs otherwise. At any time prior to submission of the proceeding to the reviewing authority for decision, the reviewing authority may direct the presiding officer to certify any question or the entire record to the reviewing authority for decision. Where the entire record is so certified, the presiding officer shall recommend a decision.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. O SCA R G U ZM A N G A RFI A S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50403 D. C . No . 2 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 5 9 0 - J HN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a c que l i ne H . N guy e n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O s c a rG uz m a n G a r f

i a s appe a l s f

r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on a nd 37- m onth s e nt e nc e f

orbe i ng a n i l l e ga l a l i e n f ound i n the U ni t e d S t a t e s f ol l ow i ng de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386



# FI LED SEP 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50403 2 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , G a r f

i a s ’ s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f or re l i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded G ar fi as the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent al br i e f ora ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. G ar fi as w ai ved h i s r i gh tt o app ea l hi s c on vi ct i on , w i th the except i on of an ap p e a l b a s e do n ac la im th a t h is p le aw a s in v o lu n tary . H e a ls o w a iv e dth e r ig h t to appealhi s s ent ence , w i th the except i on of the court ’ s c al cul at i on of hi s c ri m i nal hi s t oryc a t e gory . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P enson v. O h io , 4 8 8 U .S . 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f a s to G a r f ia s ’s p le ao rth e c r im in a l h is to ryc a te g o ryc a lc u la te db yth e c o u rt. W e the r e f or e a f f i rm a s t o thos e i s s ue s . W e di s m i s s the r e m a i nde rof the appe a l i n l i ght o f th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 2 3 5 F .3 d1 1 7 9 , 1 1 8 2 ( 9 th C i r. 20 00 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. A F F IR M E D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
```

[Federal Register: June 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 123)]
[Notices]               
[Page 36648]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn10-52]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, Reactor and 
Fuel Cycle Technologies Subcommittee

AGENCY: Office of Nuclear Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 21, 2010, the Department of Energy published a notice 
announcing an open meeting of the Reactor and Fuel Cycle Technologies 
(RFCT) Subcommittee, 75 FR 35001. In that notice, the date of the 
meeting listed under DATES was Monday, July 13, 2010 and is incorrect. 
The correct date is Monday, July 12, 2010.
    Also, in that notice under Public Participation it was indicated 
that the meeting will be available via live audio Webcast. The meeting 
is now planned to be live video Webcast. Additional information will be 
available regarding the live video Webcast via the Commission at http://www.brc.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 22, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-15596 Filed 6-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### § 1010.5 Statutory exemptions.

A listing of the statutory exemptions is contained in 15 U.S.C. 1702. In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1702(a)(2), if the sale involves a condominium or multi-unit construction, a presale clause conditioning the sale of a unit on a certain percentage of sales of other units is permissible if it is legally binding on the parties and is for a period not to exceed 180 days. However, the 180-day provision cannot extend the 2-year period for performance. The permissible 180 days is calculated from the date the first purchaser signs a sales contract in the project or, if a phased project, from the date the first purchaser signs the first sales contract in each phase.

[81 FR 29116, May 11, 2016]
# CA2022093EN.01000101.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 93/1

---

Notice amending Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions – COM/2022/20072

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 43 A of 28 January 2022
  )

(2022/C 93 A/01)

On page 5, ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

| for: | ‘The closing date for registration is 25 February 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 25 February 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’,

| read: | ‘The closing date for registration is 11 March 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 11 March 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’.

---
§ 1202.6 What if my request does not have all the information FHFA requires? If FHFA determines that your request does not reasonably describe the records you seek, cannot be processed for reasons related to fees, or lacks required information, you will be informed in writing why your request cannot be processed. You will be given 15 calendar days to meet all requirements. If you are notified that your request cannot be processed for the reasons cited herein, your request will be placed on hold and will not be considered as being received by FHFA for the purpose of processing your request under this part. ( a ) If you respond with all the necessary information, FHFA will process this response as a new request and the time period for FHFA to respond to your request will start from the date the additional information is actually received by FHFA.
( b ) If you do not respond or provide additional information within the time period allowed, or if the additional information you provide is still incomplete or insufficient, FHFA will consider your request closed and will notify you that it will not be processed.
[82 FR 13745, Mar. 15, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 5683, Feb. 9, 2018]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2021-2 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  June 17, 2022



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 





---
§ 74.15 What length of time may a business participate in VIP Verification Program? ( a ) A participant receives an eligibility term of 3 years from the date of CVE's approval letter establishing verified status.
( b ) The participant must maintain its eligibility during its tenure and must inform CVE of any changes that would affect its eligibility within 30 days.
( c ) The eligibility term may be shortened by removal pursuant to § 74.2, application pursuant to § 74.14(b), voluntary withdrawal by the participant pursuant to § 74.21, or cancellation pursuant to § 74.22.
( d ) CVE may initiate a verification examination whenever it receives credible information concerning a participant's eligibility as a VOSB. Upon its completion of the examination, CVE will issue a written decision regarding the continued eligibility status of the questioned participant.
( e ) If CVE finds that the participant does not qualify as a VOSB, the procedures at § 74.22 will apply, except as provided in § 74.2.
( f ) If CVE finds that the participant continues to qualify as a VOSB, the original eligibility period remains in effect.
[83 FR 48231, Sept. 24, 2018]
§ 1209.54 Exceptions to recommended decision. ( a ) *Filing exceptions.* Within 30 days after service of the recommended decision, recommended findings and conclusions, and proposed order under § 1209.53, a party may file with the Director written exceptions to the presiding officer's recommended decision, recommended findings and conclusions, and proposed order; to the admission or exclusion of evidence; or to the failure of the presiding officer to make a ruling proposed by a party. A supporting brief may be filed at the time the exceptions are filed, either as part of the same document or in a separate document.
( b ) *Effect of failure to file or raise exceptions.* ( 1 ) Failure of a party to file exceptions to those matters specified in paragraph (a) of this section within the time prescribed is deemed a waiver of objection thereto.
( 2 ) No exception need be considered by the Director if the party taking exception had an opportunity to raise the same objection, issue, or argument before the presiding officer and failed to do so.
( c ) *Contents.* ( 1 ) All exceptions and briefs in support of such exceptions must be confined to the particular matters in or omissions from the presiding officer's recommendations to which that party takes exception.
( 2 ) All exceptions and briefs in support of exceptions must set forth page or paragraph references to the specific parts of the presiding officer's recommendations to which exception is taken, the page or paragraph references to those portions of the record relied upon to support each exception, and the legal authority relied upon to support each exception. Exceptions and briefs in support shall not exceed a total of 30 pages, except by leave of the Director on motion.
( 3 ) One reply brief may be submitted by each party opposing the exceptions within 10 days of service of exceptions and briefs in support of exceptions. Reply briefs shall not exceed 15 pages, except by leave of the Director on motion.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 21, 2020

No. 04-20-00501-CR

Kevin Arick O'DELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-19-0000144

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 12, 2020, the trial court signed an order of deferred adjudication, pursuant to 

a plea bargain. On September 28, 2020, appellant filed with the trial court clerk a request for 

forms to appeal the order of deferred adjudication. A copy of appellant’s request for forms was 

filed with our court and docketed as a notice of appeal.

Appellant filed his request for forms well after the prescribed time limit for perfecting an 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; see also R. 26.3 (providing for a fifteen-day grace period). 

“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a 

party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 

615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Accordingly, appellant is 

ORDERED to show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

In addition, the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this criminal case, “is a 

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the 

defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court 

certification to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, showing appellant 

has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 

610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

no pet.).

FILE COPY
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
§ 1237.10 Limited-life regulated entities. ( a ) *Status.* The United States Government shall be considered a person for purposes of section 1367(i)(6)(C)(i) of the Safety and Soundness Act.
( b ) *Investment authority.* The requirements of section 1367(i)(4) shall apply only to the liquidity portfolio of a limited-life regulated entity.
( c ) *Policies and procedures.* The Agency may draft such policies and procedures with respect to limited-life regulated entities as it determines to be necessary and appropriate, including policies and procedures regarding the timing of the creation of limited-life regulated entities.