alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                683,203
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         56,870
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                                16,324,500           <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        17,836,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                               8,496,598            <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              0                    <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          0
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,556,514            <F4>
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         638,288              <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    629,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          289,165
<EPS-BASIC>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2021349EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 349/01)

Last publication

OJ C 338, 23.8.2021

Past publications

OJ C 329, 16.8.2021

OJ C 320, 9.8.2021

OJ C 310, 2.8.2021

OJ C 297, 26.7.2021

OJ C 289, 19.7.2021

OJ C 278, 12.7.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2499

BEKELECH TERESA,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A72-416-950)

Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua O.A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Springs,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney

General, Terri J. Scadron, Senior Litigation Counsel, John D.

Williams, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bekelech Teresa petitions this court to review the denial of

her application for asylum by the Board of Immigrations Appeals

(Board). We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order denying

asylum and find no reversible error. Accordingly the petition for

review is dismissed and we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Bekelech v. INS, No. A72-416-950 (BIA Sept. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

Calendar No. 312 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, 

as the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAJOR SCOTT NISELY POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 309 East Linn Street in 

6 Marshalltown, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Major Scott Nisely Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2563 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely 

5 Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 312 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely al Service located at 309 East Linn Street in 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
### SIP ADOPTION ORDER

The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) held a public comment period fi•om July 10 to August 14, 2015 and offered to hold a public hearing on August 11 to receive comments on the proposal to: • Include select Benton Clean Air Agency Regulation 1 sections in the Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP). These proposed changes are necessary to align state and local air quality SIP-approved rules and to clarify for SIP and federal enforceability purposes where Benton has corresponding local rules that apply in lieu of Chapter 173-400 WAC. Ecology published a public hearing and comment period notice in the Daily Journal of Commerce on August 10, 2015. This allowed Ecology to meet the requirement for more than the 31 days of advanced notice. No comments were received; Ecology met all state and federal procedural requirements. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the referenced document, constituting the revision, is approved and adopted by the Department of Ecology as part of the Washington State Implementation Plan. All provisions of the Washington State Implementation Plan inconsistent with the attached documents are superseded. 

# 16u

a A 

# o . LOk Maia Bellon, Director Department of Ecology

Dae
Exhibit 99.7





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Glass House Brands Inc.

Long Beach, California



We hereby consent to our report dated March 22,
2022, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Glass House Brands Inc. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2021
and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, which appears in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form
40-F (the “Annual Report”) as filed with the United States Securities Exchange Commission.



/s/ Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP



Los Angeles, California

March 22, 2022



|Macias Gini & O’Connell
    LLP    |                | 
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | 
|2029 Century Park East, Suite 1500 | www.mgocpa.com | 
|Los Angeles, CA 90067              |
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Niger

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Niger			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal and enacted budget accessible to the public, including online.  It did not publish an end-of-year report within a reasonable period.  Information on some debt obligations was publicly available but was not available for state-owned enterprises.  Budget documents provided an incomplete picture of the government’s expenditures and revenues and insufficient detail on allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises.  The government published revised budgets when revenues and expenditures deviated from initial projections in its end-of-year report.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence.  It audited the government’s executed budget and made its audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period.  The government specified in law the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses but did not always follow those regulations in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Niger’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Making its end-of-year report publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Ensuring the budget provides a substantially full picture by including major sources of revenue and expenditure;
- Detailing allocations to, earnings from, and debt holdings of major state-owned enterprises; and
- Following natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentNiger

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2570 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. 

Carson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

TANCREDO, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. SALAZAR, and Ms. DEGETTE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort 

6 Collins, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2570 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 12, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Chris Sherry, EPA 

SUBJECT: October 31, 2014 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held between EPA staff and a group of Princeton University undergraduates on a 

study tour. The meeting focused on answering clarifying questions about the proposed Clean 

Power Plan. 

ATTENDEES 

US EPA 

Chris Sherry OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division 

Princeton Student Group 

Tate Crosby 

Daniel Jang 

Anne Merrill 

Max Grear 

Frank Nguyen 

Davy Perlman 

Gokul P. Mukunda 

Manali Gokhale 

Rohan Doshi 

Evaline Tsai
# C_2022147EN.01000301.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/3

---

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(2022/C 147/03)

I.   Name of the EGTC, address and contact point (as it is currently in the EGTC register)

Official name: EGTC Linieland van Waas en Hulst

Registered office: Burgemeester Omer De Meyplein 1, 9170 Sint-Gillis-Waas

Person responsible (Director): Richard Meersschaert

E-mail address: info@egtslinieland.eu

Internet address of the Grouping: www.egtslinieland.eu

II.   New members

Official name: Maatschappij Linkerscheldeoever

Postal address: Sint-Paulusplein 27, 9120 Beveren

Internet address: www.mlso.be

Country: Belgium

---
# Official Journal L 137/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 137 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5712 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 137

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5712 May 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 476/2014 of 12 May 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/263/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 6 May 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee | 6 |
| | | 2014/264/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 6 May 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Hungary | 7 |
| | * | Council Decision 2014/265/CFSP of 12 May 2014 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 476/2014 of 12 May 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

3

DECISIONS

2014/263/EU

*

Council Decision of 6 May 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

6

2014/264/EU

*

Council Decision of 6 May 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Hungary

7

*

Council Decision 2014/265/CFSP of 12 May 2014 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### EVANS *v.*WOODLEY.

Mechanics’ Liens — Contracts—Performance—Breach.

Complainant was not entitled to a mechanic’s lien under a contract providing that defendant should pay a stipulated sum when the work should be performed and accepted, upon a showing that he abandoned, the work before he completed the contract, that to complete it would cost §110, and that the actual cost of completion was $250, and that defendant never accepted complainant’s work.

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J.

Submitted October 10,1912.

(Docket No. 19.)

Decided November 8, 1912.

Bill by John Evans against Jennie N. Woodley for the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

*Ralph M. Tate,*for complainant.

*Frank D. Andrus,*for defendant.

*21Brooke, J.

The hill of complaint in this case is filed to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The contract between the parties contained the following clause:

> “ The party of the first part, for and in consideration of the fulfillment by the said party of the second part of the covenants and agreements of the said party of the second part herein contained, does hereby covenant and agree to pay or cause to be paid to said party of the second part the sum of $495, when the work is completed and accepted by the said party of the first part.”

Complainant introduced evidence tending to show that he had never fully completed his contract, and that defendant had not accepted the work. He further offered the evidence of two contractors, who examined the job after he abandoned it. They testified that to complete the job according to the contract would cost $110. Under these proofs defendant moved the court for a decree dismissing the bill. This having been denied, defendant offered evidence tending to show that to complete the contract she had been obliged to pay the sum of $250.

We are of opinion that the bill should have been dismissed. Here is an indivisible contract, by the terms of which nothing is due the contractor until the work is completed and accepted by the owner. By his own testimony complainant shows failure to complete on his part and failure to accept on the part of defendant. Under such a state of facts, the refusal to accept being reasonable, a bill will not lie to enforce a mechanic’s lien for a balance claimed to be due. *Boots*v. *Steinberg,*100 Mich. 134 (58 N. W. 657).

The bill of complaint is dismissed, with costs of both courts.

Moore, *C.*J., and Steere, McAlvay, Kuhn, Stone, Ostrander, and Bird, JJ., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49435-49436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 29, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC, 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. METRO: L'Enfant Plaza Station 
(Use 7th & Maryland Exit).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 
meeting. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions).
    <bullet> ATMAC ADS-B WG Report, Discussion, and Tasking.
    <bullet> RTCA Task Force on NextGen Mid-Term Implementation 
(NextGen TF): Recommendations and Post TF Collaboration.
    <bullet> Trajectory Based Operations: Discussion and Potential 
Tasking.
    <bullet> ATMAC R&P WG Report, Discussion, and Tasking.
    <bullet> ATMAC Member Discussion and Recommendations.
    <bullet> Proposed 2010 Meeting Schedule.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary (Other Business, Member Discussion, 
Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability.

[[Page 49436]]

With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present 
oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements 
or obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR 
FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 22, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-23275 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4519 Eligible purposes and reasonable value requirements. ( a ) A loan may be made only for the purpose hereinafter set forth in this paragraph, and the loan may not exceed the reasonable value of the property as established by the Department of Veterans Affairs: ( 1 ) To purchase or construct a dwelling to be owned and occupied by the veteran as a home;
( 2 ) To purchase a farm on which there is a farm residence to be occupied by the veteran as a home;
( 3 ) To construct on land owned by the veteran a farm residence to be occupied by the veteran as a home;
( 4 ) To repair, alter, or improve a farm residence or other dwelling owned and occupied or to be reoccupied after the completion of major alterations, repairs, or improvements to the property, by the veteran as his or her home;
( 5 ) To make energy conservation improvements to a dwelling owned and occupied or to be occupied after the completion of major alterations, repairs, or improvements to the property, by the veteran as his or her home;
( 6 ) To refinance (38 U.S.C. 3710(a)(5)) existing mortgage loans or other lines which are secured of record on a dwelling or farm residence owned and occupied or to be reoccupied after the completion of major alterations, repairs or improvements to the property, by the veteran as the veteran's home; *Provided,* The veteran certifies, in such form as the Secretary may prescribe, that he or she has paid in cash from his or her own resources on account of such purchase, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement a sum equal to the difference, if any, between the purchase price or cost of the property and its reasonable value.
( b ) In the case of a loan for the construction of a farm residence or other dwelling on land owned by the veteran, a portion of the loan proceeds may be expended to liquidate an indebtedness secured by a lien against such land, but only if the reasonable value of the land is equal to or in excess of the amount of the indebtedness secured by such lien and if the liquidation of such indebtedness will permit the loan to be secured by a first lien. Except as provided in § 36.4507, no portion of the proceeds of a loan for repairs, alterations or improvements to a farm residence or other dwelling may be expended to liquidate a prior lien against the property.
( c ) No direct loan may be made for the purpose of an interest rate reduction refinancing loan pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3710(a)(8).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3711(b))
[20 FR 6261, Aug. 26, 1955, as amended at 43 FR 60461, Dec. 28, 1978; 46 FR 43675, Aug. 31, 1981; 49 FR 42571, Oct. 23, 1984]