alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 25, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133527 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

In re: Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

The Honorable JEANETTE O’BANNER-OWENS, 

36th District Court 

 Justices 

421 Madison, Suite 3068 

Detroit, MI 48226 

 SC: 133527

 JTC: Formal Complaint No. 80 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the petition for interim suspension is considered and, in lieu 

of granting the petition, the parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefs within 

14 days of the date this order addressing the issue whether respondent, as a matter of due 

process, is entitled to disclosure of the eight-page letter or letters sent to the physicians 

who examined respondent pursuant to MCR 9.207(D). The petition for interim 

suspension remains pending. 

p0418 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 25, 2007 

 Clerk
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 13709 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D

. C . D ocket No. 6:13

- cr - 00171

- RBD

- GJK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CLINTON JAMES DUNSTON, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (S eptember 29, 2016) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : The Federal Public Defender’s Office, through attorney Conrad Kahn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in this appeal of the district court’s denial of a motion to reduce sentence brought under 18 U.S.C. §

Case: 15-13709 Date Filed: 09/29/2016 Page: 1 of 22 3582(c)(2) , and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87
S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and the district court’ s denial
of the motion to r educe sentence is AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-13709 Date Filed: 09/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2
How To Wear Soft Foam Earplugs

To get the best protection from your soft foam earplugs, remember to roll, pull,

and hold when putting them in. Use clean hands to keep from getting dirt and

germs into your ears!

1. Roll the earplug up into a small, thin "snake" with

your fingers. You can use one or both hands.

2. Pull the top of your ear up and back with your

opposite hand to straighten out your ear canal.

The rolled-up earplug should slide right in.

3. Hold the earplug in with your finger. Count to 20 or

30 out loud while waiting for the plug to

expand and fill the ear canal. Your voice will

sound muffled when the plug has made a

good seal.

Check the fit when you're all done. Most of the foam body of the earplug should

be within the ear canal. Try cupping your hands tightly over your ears. If sounds

are much more muffled with your hands in place, the earplug may not be sealing

properly. Take the earplug out and try again.
Order entered October 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00517-CR

ARIANNA LINDSEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1171158-J

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief 

tendered to the Clerk of the Court October 6, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
#### Max Goldwasser, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

M. D. Steuer, for respondent.

McCarthy, J.

We find no good grounds urged by the appellant upon which to reverse the judgment herein.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Hascall, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
# C_2022484EN.01002501.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/25

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Belgium

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Belgium

Subject of commemoration: The healthcare sector in recognition of the exceptional commitment during the Covid-19 pandemic

Description of the design: The design depicts in the inner part of the coin the health personnel. At the left you can find the inscription ‘Danke – Merci – Dank u’ together with various pictograms referring to healthcare sector. From top to bottom, a cross, a stethoscope, a heart, a syringe, a wheelchair and a chemical mixture are shown. At the far right are the initials of the designer Luc Luycx located. As the Royal Dutch Mint will strike the coins, the mintmark of Utrecht, a mercury staff is located on the bottom together with the Belgian mint master mark, the coat of arms of the municipality Herzele, the country code BE and the year mark 2022.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 2 000 000

Date of issue: Spring 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
EXHIBIT 4.22


 


[Letterhead of Ernst
& Young Hua Ming LLP ]


 


April 30, 2015


 


Securities and Exchange Commission 


100 F Street, N.E. 


Washington, D.C. 20549 


United States


 


Dear Sirs/Madams,


 


We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F
dated April 30, 2015 of Vimicro International Corporation and are in agreement with the statements contained in the second,
third, fourth, fifth and seventh paragraphs under Item 16F on page 117 therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with
other statements of the registrant contained therein.


 


Regarding the registrant's
statement concerning the lack of internal control to prepare financial statements, included in the   fourth paragraph on page
118 therein, we had considered such matter in determining the nature, timing and extent of procedures performed in our audit
of the registrant's 2012 financial statements.


 


Yours faithfully,


 


/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming LLP
CNO 03.31.2015 EX 10.5






Exhibit 10.5


CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CNO Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is amending the treatment of awards under the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") in the event that your employment is terminated due to death or disability or in connection with a Change in Control.  Capitalized terms used in this letter agreement without definition shall have the meaning set forth in the original award agreement(s).  
(a)Effect on Vesting and Exercisability of Options upon Termination of Employment.  Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary of an outstanding award agreement under the Plan, the following special vesting rules shall apply if your employment with the Company or a Subsidiary terminates prior to an Option becoming fully vested and/or prior to the Expiration Date in the circumstances set forth below:


(i)Termination Due to Death.  If your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary due to your death, any portion of an Option that was not exercisable on the date of such termination shall vest in full as of such date and all outstanding Options shall be exercisable until twelve (12) months after the date of such termination, but in no event after the Expiration Date of the Option.


(ii)Termination Due to Disability.  If your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary due to your Disability, any portion of an Option which remains outstanding at such date shall continue to vest on the dates included in the award agreement and you may exercise the Option until the earlier of (x) the Expiration Date or (y) five years after the date your employment is terminated due to Disability.


(iii)Change in Control.  In the event your employment is terminated by the Company or a Subsidiary without Cause or by you for Good Reason within six months prior to and in anticipation of or within 24 months after a Change in Control has occurred, the Option shall become vested and fully exercisable as to all of the Option Shares.


(b) All other provisions of the outstanding Option award agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 


To execute this amendment and confirm your agreement to its terms you must click the Acknowledge and Agree button in the accompanying email.
Very truly yours,
	
		
	CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Sue Menzel

	Susan L. Menzel, EVP, Human Resources
#### § 1291.43 Approval of AHP applications.

A Bank shall approve applications for AHP direct subsidy under its Homeownership Set-Aside Programs in accordance with the Bank's criteria governing the allocation of funds.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0089

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. H.R., Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Inte rnal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Kathy Seeley , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2023

09/20/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0089
§ 128.3 Nondiscrimination in applications. ( a ) No savings association may discourage, or refuse to allow, receive, or consider, any application, request, or inquiry regarding a loan or other service, or discriminate in imposing conditions upon, or in processing, any such application, request, or inquiry on the basis of the age or location of the dwelling, or on the basis of the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status (having one or more children under the age of 18), marital status, age (provided the person has the capacity to contract), national origin, or other characteristics prohibited from consideration in § 128.2(c) of this part, of the prospective borrower or other person, who: ( 1 ) Makes application for any such loan or other service;
( 2 ) Requests forms or papers to be used to make application for any such loan or other service; or
( 3 ) Inquires about the availability of such loan or other service.
( b ) A savings association shall inform each inquirer of his or her right to file a written loan application, and to receive a copy of the association's underwriting standards.
Note to § 128.3 :
*See also,* § 128.9(a) through (d).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793730
<NAME> NHP RETIREMENT HOUSING PARTNERS I LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,620,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  833,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      63,202,501
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,765,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,012,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     42,672,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,877,376)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,012,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,452,298
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,712,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               415,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,107,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,782,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,782,987)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EON

ERAPERIOD/SUBPERIODEPOCH

Age estimated in million years before present unless otherwise noted

Phanerozoic

Cenozoic (Cz)

Quaternary 

(Q)

Holocene

Pleistocene

Tertiary (T)

Neogene 

(N)

Pliocene

Miocene

Paleogene 

(Pε)

Oligocene

Eocene

Paleocene

Mesozoic (Mz)

Cretaceous 

(K)

Jurassic 

(J)

Triassic 

(TR)

Paleozoic (Pz)

Permian 

(P)

Carboniferous (C)

Pennsylvanian 

(IP)

Mississippian 

(M)

Devonian 

(D)

Silurian 

(S)

Ordovician 

(O)

Cambrian 

(C)

EONERAPERIOD

Age estimated in million years before present

Proterozoic (P)

Neoproterozoic (Z)

Ediacaran

Cryogenian

Tonian

Mesoproterozoic (Y)

Stenian

Ectasian

Calymmian

Paleoproterozoic (X)

Statherian

Orosirian

Rhyacian

Siderian

Archean (A)

Neoarchean Mesoarchean Paleoarchean Eoarchean

Hadean (pA)

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

http://www.usgs.gov

1–888–ASK–USGS

Ages shown for 

divisions of geologic 

time are general 

representations. 

For more specific 

age information, see 

U.S. Geological Survey 

Fact Sheet 2010–3059.

GIP 141

11,700 yr

2.588

5.332

23.03

33.9

55.8

65.5

145.5

199.6

251.0

299.0

318.1

359.2

416.0

443.7

488.3

542.0

635

850

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2050

2300

2500

2800

3200

3600

 4000

 4600  ̃ ̃

Continued on other side
#### § 1271.39 Review of books and records.

FHFA shall examine the Financing Corporation at least annually to determine whether the Financing Corporation is performing its functions in accordance with the requirements of section 21 of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1441) and this subpart.
# C_2021368EN.01000101.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 368/01)

Last publication

OJ C 357, 6.9.2021

Past publications

OJ C 349, 30.8.2021

OJ C 338, 23.8.2021

OJ C 329, 16.8.2021

OJ C 320, 9.8.2021

OJ C 310, 2.8.2021

OJ C 297, 26.7.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 1270.4 Issuance of consolidated obligations. ( a ) *Consolidated obligations issued by the Banks* — ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions of this part and such other rules, regulations, terms, and conditions as the Director may prescribe, the Banks may issue joint debt under section 11(c) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1431(c)), which shall be consolidated obligations, on which the Banks shall be jointly and severally liable in accordance with § 1270.10 of this part.
( 2 ) Consolidated obligations shall be issued only through the Office of Finance, as agent of the Banks pursuant to this part and part 1273 of this chapter.
( 3 ) All consolidated obligations shall be issued in *pari passu.*
( b ) Negative pledge requirement. Each Bank shall at all times maintain assets described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of this section free from any lien or pledge, in an amount at least equal to a *pro rata* share of the total amount of currently outstanding consolidated obligations and equal to such Bank's participation in all such consolidated obligations outstanding, provided that any assets that are subject to a lien or pledge for the benefit of the holders of any issue of consolidated obligations shall be treated as if they were assets free from any lien or pledge for purposes of compliance with this paragraph (b). Eligible assets are: ( 1 ) Cash;
( 2 ) Obligations of or fully guaranteed by the United States;
( 3 ) Secured advances;
( 4 ) Mortgages as to which one or more Banks have any guaranty or insurance, or commitment therefor, by the United States or any agency thereof; and
( 5 ) Investments described in section 16(a) of the Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1436(a)).
[76 FR 18369, Apr. 4, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 67009, Nov. 8, 2013]
### Willie Ray #1210691 Powledge Unit 1400 F.M.3452 

### Palestine,Texas 75803July 2,2015

Clerk Louise Pearson Court Of Criminal Appeals P.O.Box 12308,Capitol Station Austin,Texas 78711

Re:Cause No.: 007-0396-03-B Writ of C0RM NOBIS Ex Parte Willie Ray Dear CLERK, 

### This is Willie Ray,my reason for writing you today is because I would like to get a update on the status of the'cause number stated above please.I thank you 

### for your attention in this matter,and may God bless you.

cc:/file Respectfully Yours Willie Ray Petitioner pro se



### RECEIVEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

### JUL 07 2015 

## Abel Acosta, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6244
DAVON JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EMILIO PAGAN, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-00108-FWB) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 31, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davon Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Davon Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# ~ PlfZr;Mf!o-tlf ---- AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

### Resolution 

### #13-02 

## Board Resolution:


# Be'fore the Placer County

- AirPollution Control DistrictBoard ofDirectors

In the Matter Of: Approve a resolution to adopt amendments to District Rule 214, Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks, as showninExhibit I. The following RESOLUTION was duly passed by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District Board ofDirectors at a regular meeting held on February 21, 2013, by the following vote: Ayes: Holmes,M. ..,/ Barkle 

### v Nader l./ Weygandt v- Ucovich 

### v Holmes, J. 

## v Ruslin 

### v Montgomery 

### v Garcia 

## v Noes: Holmes,M. Barkle Nader Weygandt Ucovich Holmes, J. Ruslin Montgomery Garcia Abstain: Holmes, M. Barkle Nader Weygandt Ucovich Holmes, J. Ruslin Montgomery Garcia Signed andap rovedbyme afterits passage:

WHEREAS, Section 40001 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State ofCalifornia authorizes the Placer County Air Pollution Control District, to adopt and enforce rules and regulations to achieve andmaintain ambient airquality standards withinthe District; and WHEREAS, Section 40702 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State ofCalifornia requires a district to adopt rules and regulations and do such acts as may be necessary orproper to execute the powers and duties granted; and WHEREAS, amendment ofthis regulation is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Title 14, California Administrative Code, Section 15308, as an action by a regulatory agency for the protection ofthe environment; and

49WHEREAS, these proceedings were held in a public hearing and were properly noticed pursuant to Section 40725 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State of California; with any evidence having been received concerning the proposed adoption of this resolution and this Board having duly considered such evidence; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that a need exists to amend Rule 214 to address State Implementation Plan revision approvability comments and rule improvement recommendations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency staff, to make necessary clarification and improvement changes identified by District staff, and to correct grammar, spelling and typographical errors. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board approves and adopts amended Rule 214, TransferofGasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks, as showninExhibit I. BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED, thatthe AirPollution Control Officer is hereby authorized and directed to request that amended Rule 214, Transfer ofGasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks, be adopted by California Air Resources Board into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and that approval ofthe revision to the SIP be requested ofthe United States Environmental Protection Agency, onbehalfofthe Placer CountyAirPollution Control District.

50