alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctioning Cuban Officials in Response to Violence against Peaceful Protestors

# 									Sanctioning Cuban Officials in Response to Violence against Peaceful Protestors							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 13, 2021

In recent weeks, the United States imposed sanctions on Cuban military and security leaders and units in response to the Cuban regime’s violent suppression of peaceful protesters on and after July 11.  Today, we are enacting additional sanctions in connection with this repression.  We take this action pursuant to Executive Order 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.

We are designating Romárico Vidal Sotomayor García, chief of the Political Directorate of the Cuban Ministry of the Interior (MININT); Pedro Orlando Martínez Fernández, chief of the Political Directorate of the Cuban National Revolutionary Police (PNR); and the Tropas de Prevención (TDP) of the Cuban Ministry of Revolutionary Armed Forces (MINFAR).

Sotomayor García’s and Martínez Fernández’s “Political Directorates” are tasked by the Cuban government with maintaining loyalty within the ranks of their organizations to the Cuban Communist Party.  MININT forces, including the PNR, carried out violent repression of peaceful protestors calling for human rights and fundamental freedoms across Cuba.  Indeed, the First Secretary of the Party and President of Cuba Miguel Diaz-Canel called the Party faithful to “combat” against protestors.

The TDP, also known as “Boinas Rojas” or Red Berets, is a unit of MINFAR’s Directorate for Counterintelligence.  During the recent protests, TDP soldiers have been deployed on the streets and have reportedly**attacked and beaten protesters, while making violent arrests.

We stand in solidarity with the courageous Cubans who are protesting for human rights and fundamental freedoms, exercising their rights in the face of repeated oppression and abuse from the Cuban regime.  The Cuban people deserve the ability to safely protest against an authoritarian regime and the failed system that has denied them access to basic necessities for decades.

The United States supports the people of Cuba in their brave call for freedom as we identify those who oppress them and attempt to maintain a repressive system. We will continue to take actions to promote accountability for the Cuban government’s human rights abuses.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCubaDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 145.1 General authority.

A Federal savings association may exercise all authority granted it by the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (“Act”), 12 U.S.C. 1464, as amended, and its charter and bylaws, whether or not implemented specifically by OCC regulations, subject to the limitations and interpretations contained in this part.
Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the “Servicer”), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021- P2 Servicing Agreement dated as of June 24, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust  2021-P2, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2023.  By: ________________________________  Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1
Filed 1/21/15 P. v. Namchek CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SANDRA NAMCHEK,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B257788 (Super. Ct. No . 2012016608) (Ventura County)

Sandra Namchek appeals her c onviction by plea to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) a nd identity theft (Pen. Code, § 530.5, subd. (c)(1)), entered after the trial c ourt denied her motion to suppress evidence. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) The trial court susp ended imposition of se ntence and granted probation with 110 days in county jail. We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On October 24, 2014. we advised a ppellant that she ha d 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which she wished us to consider. We have received no response from appellant. The preliminary hearing transcript re flects that the Port Hueneme Police responded to a domestic dispute call, cond ucted a probation search of appellant, and2 found a $1,046.95 check in the name of Brad ford Bumpus III and a Chase bank statement issued to Maria Garcia in appellant's ba g. Appellant was carrying: a digital scale covered with narcotics residue; information about the Bumpus check, the bank routing number and account number, and the victim's home address; day planners and calendars with the personal information of two individu als; and access card information for five

other individuals. ~ (CT 41) ~ Appellant was also carryi ng two glass pipes and a small plastic baggie of .66 grams of methamphetami ne. The victim, Bradford Bumpus, advised a police detective that his rent check was stolen from the drop box at his apartment complex.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with her respon sibilities and that no arguable issues exist. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal. 3d 436, 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125- 126.) The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J3 Roger Lund, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

________________ ______________

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Su zan E. Hier, Staff Attorney for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance fo r Respondent.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.64



                                                 March 9, 2000


Arthur A. Siciliano, Ph.D.
3 Pavia Place
Framingham, MA   01701

                      Re: AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Dear Art,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the employment agreement dated as
of May 16, 1990, by and between you and PolyMedica Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of June 1, 1991;
December 5, 1991; March 18, 1993; March 31, 1994; April 11, 1995; April 3, 1996;
July 1, 1997; July 1, 1998; September 22, 1998; and June 14, 1999 (together, the
"Employment Agreement").

         SALARY. The Base Salary, as defined in Section 3.1. of the Employment
         Agreement, shall be increased to $330,000 effective April 1, 2000.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Steven J. Lee

                                            Steven J. Lee
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


/s/ Arthur A. Siciliano. Ph.D
------------------------------
Arthur A. Siciliano, Ph.D
President; President, PolyMedica Pharmaceuticals (U.S.A.), Inc.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1102

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

#### § 1102.5 Order initiating a temporary waiver proceeding.

The ASC may exercise discretion in determining whether to issue an Order initiating a temporary waiver proceeding in response to a Petition, or alternatively, the ASC may exercise discretion to initiate a temporary waiver proceeding on its own initiative without a Petition being submitted. In either event, such an Order would include consideration of certain items that would be addressed in a Request for Temporary Waiver. (*See, e.g.,* § 1102.3(b)(2) through (6).) If such an Order is issued, the ASC shall publish a Federal Register notice in accordance with § 1102.6(b).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6085

LARON A. MOTEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN OF THE AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-1087) Submitted: April 7, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laron A. Moten, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Moten does not challenge on appeal the district court’s dismissal of two claims in a prior order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the court’s dismissal of one claim on procedural default grounds. Moten has waived appellate review of these claims by failing to raise them in his informal brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 2 PER CURIAM: Laron A. Moten, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). * An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); seeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moten has not satisfied this standard. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1248.2 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to: ( a ) Enhance liquidity in the MBS marketplace, and to that end, enable adoption of the UMBS, by achieving sufficient similarity of cash flows on cohorts of TBA-eligible MBS such that investors will accept delivery of UMBS from either issuer in settlement of trades on the TBA market.
( b ) Provide transparency and durability into the process for creating alignment.
§ 1249.13 Creation of Participant's Security Entitlement; security interests. ( a ) A Participant's Security Entitlement is created when a Federal Reserve Bank indicates by book-entry that a Book-entry Enterprise Security has been credited to a Participant's Securities Account.
( b ) A security interest in a Security Entitlement of a Participant in favor of the United States to secure deposits of public money, including without limitation deposits to the Treasury tax and loan accounts, or other security interest in favor of the United States that is required by Federal statute, regulation, or agreement, and that is marked on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank is thereby effected and perfected, and has priority over any other interest in the securities. Where a security interest in favor of the United States in a Security Entitlement of a Participant is marked on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank, such Federal Reserve Bank may rely, and is protected in relying, exclusively on the order of an authorized representative of the United States directing the transfer of the security. For purposes of this paragraph, an “authorized representative of the United States” is the official designated in the applicable regulations or agreement to which a Federal Reserve Bank is a party, governing the security interest.
( c ) ( 1 ) An Enterprise and the Federal Reserve Banks have no obligation to agree to act on behalf of any Person or to recognize the interest of any transferee of a security interest or other limited interest in favor of any Person except to the extent of any specific requirement of Federal law or regulation or to the extent set forth in any specific agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank on whose books the interest of the Participant is recorded. To the extent required by such law or regulation or set forth in an agreement with a Federal Reserve Bank, or the Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circular, a security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank, an Enterprise, or a Person may be created and perfected by a Federal Reserve Bank marking its books to record the security interest. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a security interest in a Security Entitlement marked on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank shall have priority over any other interest in the securities.
( 2 ) In addition to the method provided in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a security interest, including a security interest in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank, may be perfected by any method by which a security interest may be perfected under applicable law as described in § 1249.12(b) or (d). The perfection, effect of perfection or non-perfection and priority of a security interest are governed by such applicable law. A security interest in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank shall be treated as a security interest in favor of a clearing corporation in all respects under such law, including with respect to the effect of perfection and priority of such security interest. A Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circular shall be treated as a rule adopted by a clearing corporation for such purposes.
§ 1081.501 Basis for issuance, form, and service. ( a ) *In general.* The Director or the Director's designee may issue a temporary cease-and-desist order if the Director determines that one or more of the alleged violations specified in a notice of charges, or the continuation thereof, is likely to cause the respondent to be insolvent or otherwise prejudice the interests of consumers before the completion of the adjudication proceeding. A temporary cease-and-desist order may require the respondent to cease and desist from any violation or practice specified in the notice of charges and to take affirmative action to prevent or remedy such insolvency or other condition pending completion of the proceedings initiated by the issuance of a notice of charges.
( b ) *Incomplete or inaccurate records.* When a notice of charges specifies, on the basis of particular facts and circumstances, that the books and records of a respondent are so incomplete or inaccurate that the Bureau is unable to determine the financial condition of the respondent or the details or purpose of any transaction or transactions that may have a material effect on the financial condition of the respondent, then the Director or the Director's designee may issue a temporary order requiring: ( 1 ) The cessation of any activity or practice which gave rise, whether in whole or in part, to the incomplete or inaccurate state of the books or records; or
( 2 ) Affirmative action to restore such books or records to a complete and accurate state, until the completion of the adjudication proceeding.
( c ) *Content, scope, and form of order.* Every temporary cease-and-desist order accompanying a notice of charges must describe: ( 1 ) The basis for its issuance, including the alleged violations and the harm that is likely to result without the issuance of an order; and
( 2 ) The act or acts the respondent is to take or refrain from taking.
( d ) *Effective and enforceable upon service.* A temporary cease-and-desist order is effective and enforceable upon service.
( e ) *Service.* Service of a temporary cease-and-desist order will be made pursuant to § 1081.113(d).
# C_2022312EN.01000401.xml

| 17.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 August 2022

(2022/C 312/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0131 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84218 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5365 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9625 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8428 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,540 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 406,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7043 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8820 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,1994 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4463 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3076 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,9449 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6012 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3980 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6556 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8767 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5100 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 968,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5245 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,602 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,930 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1835 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1595 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,3745 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0131

JPY

Japanese yen

136,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84218

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5365

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9625

ISK

Iceland króna

140,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8428

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,540

HUF

Hungarian forint

406,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7043

RON

Romanian leu

4,8820

TRY

Turkish lira

18,1994

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4463

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3076

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,9449

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6012

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3980

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,66

ZAR

South African rand

16,6556

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8767

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5100

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 968,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5245

PHP

Philippine peso

56,602

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

35,930

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1835

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1595

INR

Indian rupee

80,3745

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Guinea

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Guinea 			

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Guinea  

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Guinea 

During the review period, the transition government made significant progress by publishing audit reports within a reasonable period. The transition government published its enacted budget and end-of-year report online within a reasonable period. Nonetheless, the transition government did not publish an executive budget proposal within a reasonable period. The enacted budget provided a substantially full picture by including major sources of revenue and expenditure, except it did not include allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises. Only limited information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available. Actual revenues and expenditures reasonably corresponded to those in the enacted budget. Budget documents were prepared according to internationally accepted principles and were comparable year-to-year. The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence. It published reports that contained substantive findings within a reasonable period, but those reports did not cover the entire annual executed budget. The transition government specified in law and followed in practice the procedures for awarding contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction. Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Guinea’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing an executive budget proposal within a reasonable period;
- Incorporating allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises in budget documents;
- Publishing sufficient information on government debt obligations, including for major state-owned enterprises; and
- Publishing audit reports of the government’s entire annual executed budget.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Guinea  

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentGuinea

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
#### § 1408.4 Delegation of authority.

The Corporation official(s) designated by the Chairman of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation are authorized to perform all duties which the Chairman is authorized to perform under these regulations, the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, and the joint regulations issued under that Act.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 27, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 27, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0263. JONATHAN SAMUEL EVANS v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18CR02859
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00385-CR

Joseph Pastquinel Scott, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 75561, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Joseph Pastquinel Scott seeks to appeal his judgment of conviction and 

sentence for aggravated sexual assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a)(2)(B). The trial court 

has certified that this is a plea-bargain case for which Scott has no right of appeal and that Scott 

has waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). 

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 30, 2022

Do Not Publish