39300 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 132 / Thursday, July 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(1) Fully automatic pellet inspection 

stations especially designed or prepared for 

checking final dimensions and surface 

defects of fuel pellets; 

(2) Automatic welding machines especially 

designed or prepared for welding end caps 

onto the fuel pins (or rods); 

(3) Automatic test and inspection stations 

especially designed or prepared for checking 

the integrity of completed fuel pins (or rods). 

This item typically includes equipment for: 

(i) X-ray examination of pin (or rod) end 

cap welds; 

(ii) Helium leak detection from pressurized 

pins (or rods); and 

(iii) Gamma-ray scanning of the pins (or 

rods) to check for correct loading of the fuel 

pellets inside. 

(4) Systems especially designed or 

prepared to manufacture nuclear fuel 

cladding. 

(c) Any other components especially 

designed or prepared for use in a fuel 

element fabrication plant or in any of the 

components described in this appendix. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day 

of June, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mark A. Satorius, 

Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15828 Filed 7–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0341; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–102–AD; Amendment 

39–17874; AD 2014–12–13] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014–03– 

06 for all the Boeing Company Model 

737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and 

–500 series airplanes. AD 2014–03–06 

required repetitive inspections for 

cracking of the aft support fitting for the 

main landing gear (MLG) beam, and the 

rear spar upper chord and rear spar web 

in the area of rear spar station (RSS) 

224.14; and repair if necessary. This AD 

clarifies two paragraph references. This 

AD was prompted by a determination 

that two paragraph references were in 

error. We are issuing this AD to detect 

and correct cracking of the aft support 

fitting for the main landing gear (MLG) 

beam, and the rear spar upper chord and 

rear spar web in the area of rear spar 

station (RSS) 224.14, which could grow 

and result in a fuel leak and possible 

fire. 

DATES: This AD is effective July 25, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of April 9, 2014 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014). 

We must receive any comments on 

this AD by August 25, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206– 

766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0341; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Office (phone: 800–647– 

5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments will be available in the AD 

docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6440; 

fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

nancy.marsh@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

On January 18, 2014, we issued AD 

2014–03–06, Amendment 39–17743 (79 

FR 12368, March 5, 2014), for all the 

Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, 

–200C, –300, –400, and –500 series 

airplanes. AD 2014–03–06 required 

repetitive inspections for cracking of the 

aft support fitting for the main landing 

gear (MLG) beam, and the rear spar 

upper chord and rear spar web in the 

area of rear spar station (RSS) 224.14; 

and repair if necessary. AD 2014–03–06 

resulted from reports of cracks found in 

the aft support fitting, the rear spar 

upper chord, and the rear spar web. We 

issued AD 2014–03–06 to detect and 

correct cracking of the aft support fitting 

for the main landing gear (MLG) beam, 

and the rear spar upper chord and rear 

spar web in the area of rear spar station 

(RSS) 224.14, which could grow and 

result in a fuel leak and possible fire. 

Actions Since AD 2014–03–06 Was 

Issued 

Since we issued AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, 

March 5, 2014), two incorrect paragraph 

references were found. The references to 

paragraphs (g) and (g)(1) in paragraph 

(h)(2) of AD 2014–03–06 are incorrect. 

The correct reference should be to the 

introductory text of paragraph (h) and 

paragraph (h)(1) of AD 2014–03–06. 

Paragraph (h)(2) of AD 2014–03–06 is 

the corrective action for the inspections 

required by the introductory text of 

paragraph (h) and paragraph (h)(1) of 

this AD. In order to mandate the 

corrective actions for the inspections 

required by the introductory text of 

paragraph (h) and paragraph (h)(1) of 

this AD, we have revised the references 

in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are issuing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of these same 

type designs. 

AD Requirements 

This AD requires repetitive 

inspections for cracking of the aft 

support fitting for the MLG beam, and 

the rear spar upper chord and rear spar 

web in the area of RSS 224.14; and 

repair if necessary. This AD corrects 

these paragraph references. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 132 / Thursday, July 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 39301 

FAA’s Justification and Determination 

of the Effective Date 

AD 2014–03–06, Amendment 39– 

17743 (79 FR 12368, March 5, 2014), 

clearly indicated that inspections, and 

repairs if necessary, are required. Since 

this new AD merely corrects incorrect 

paragraph references, notice and 

opportunity for public comment before 

issuing this AD are unnecessary. 

Comments Invited 

This AD is a final rule that involves 

requirements affecting flight safety, and 

we did not provide you with notice and 

an opportunity to provide your 

comments before it becomes effective. 

However, we invite you to send any 

written data, views, or arguments about 

this AD. Send your comments to an 

address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include the docket number 

FAA–2014–0341 and directorate 

identifier 2014–NM–102–AD at the 

beginning of your comments. We 

specifically invite comments on the 

overall regulatory, economic, 

environmental, and energy aspects of 

this AD. We will consider all comments 

received by the closing date and may 

amend this AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 353 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection [Retained actions 

from AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39-17743 (79 

FR 12368, March 5, 2014)].

Up to 86 work-hours × $85 per 

hour = $7,310 per inspection 

cycle.

$0 Up to $7,310 per inspection 

cycle.

Up to $2,580,430 per inspection cycle. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition actions 

specified in this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

2014–03–06, Amendment 39–17743 (79 

FR 12368, March 5, 2014), and adding 

the following new AD: 

2014–12–13 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17874; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0341; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–102–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective July 25, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD replaces AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014). 

(c) Applicability 

(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing 

Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, 

–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes, 

certificated in any category. 

(2) Installation of Supplemental Type 

Certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://

rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_

Library/rgstc.nsf/0/2C6E3DBDDD

36F91C862576A4005D64E2?OpenDocument

&Highlight=st01219se) does not affect the 

ability to accomplish the actions required by 

this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which 

STC ST01219SE is installed, a ‘‘change in 

product’’ alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to 

comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 

39.17. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 57, Wings. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of cracks 

found in the aft support fitting, the rear spar 

upper chord, and the rear spar web. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking 

of the aft support fitting for the main landing 

gear (MLG) beam, and the rear spar upper 

chord and rear spar web in the area of rear 

spar station (RSS) 224.14, which could grow 

and result in a fuel leak and possible fire. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
39302 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 132 / Thursday, July 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(g) Retained Inspections: Group 1 Airplanes 

This paragraph restates the actions 

required by paragraph (g) of AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014) with no changes. For airplanes 

identified in Group 1 of Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–57–1318, 

dated May 15, 2013: At the applicable time 

specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

737–57–1318, dated May 15, 2013, except as 

required by paragraph (i) of this AD, do 

inspections and applicable corrective actions 

using a method approved in accordance with 

the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of 

this AD. 

(h) Retained Inspections: Groups 2–7 

Airplanes 

This paragraph restates the actions 

required by the introductory text of 

paragraph (h) of AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014) with no changes. For airplanes 

identified in Groups 2 through 7 of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–57– 

1318, dated May 15, 2013: At the applicable 

time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–57–1318, dated May 15, 

2013, except as required by paragraph (i) of 

this AD, do high frequency eddy current 

inspections to detect cracking of the aft 

support fitting for the MLG beam, and the 

rear spar upper chord and rear spar web in 

the area of rear spar station 224.14, as 

applicable, in accordance with Option 1, 2, 

or 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

737–57–1318, dated May 15, 2013. 

(1) This paragraph restates the actions 

required by paragraph (h)(1) of AD 2014–03– 

06, Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, 

March 5, 2014) with no changes. If no crack 

is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at 

the time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–57–1318, dated May 15, 

2013, as applicable. Accomplishment of the 

inspection of the 12 fastener holes (locations 

1–12) in accordance with Option 2, Action 3; 

or Option 3, Action 3; as specified in note (b) 

of tables 2 through 5 of paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–57–1318, dated May 15, 

2013; terminates only the corresponding 

inspections that include note (b) in the 

‘‘Repeat Interval’’ column of the applicable 

table. 

(2) This paragraph restates the actions 

required by paragraph (h)(2) of AD 2014–03– 

06, Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, 

March 5, 2014), with revised paragraph 

references to the introductory text of 

paragraph (h) and to paragraph (h)(1) of this 

AD to mandate corrective actions. If any 

crack is found during any inspection 

required by the introductory text of 

paragraph (h) or by paragraph (h)(1) of this 

AD, repair before further flight using a 

method approved in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this 

AD. 

(i) Retained Exception to Service 

Information Specifications 

This paragraph restates the actions 

required by paragraph (i) of AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014), with no changes. Where Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–57– 

1318, dated May 15, 2013, specifies a 

compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date 

of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires 

compliance within the specified compliance 

time after April 9, 2014 (the effective date of 

AD 2014–03–06). 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be 

emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA), which has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2014–03–06, 

Amendment 39–17743 (79 FR 12368, March 

5, 2014), are approved as AMOCs for the 

corresponding provisions of this AD. 

(k) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6440; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: nancy.marsh@faa.gov. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(3) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on April 9, 2014 (79 FR 

12368, March 5, 2014). 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–57–1318, dated May 15, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(4) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(6) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington on June 6, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14475 Filed 7–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 1150 

[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0920] 

RIN 0910–AG81 

Tobacco Products, User Fees, 

Requirements for the Submission of 

Data Needed To Calculate User Fees 

for Domestic Manufacturers and 

Importers of Tobacco Products 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or we) is issuing a 

final rule that requires domestic tobacco 

product manufacturers and importers to 

submit information needed to calculate 

the amount of user fees assessed under 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act (the FD&C Act). The United States 

Department of Agriculture (USDA) has 

been collecting this information and 

providing FDA with the data FDA needs 

to calculate the amount of user fees 

assessed to tobacco product 

manufacturers and importers. USDA 

intends to cease collecting this 

information starting in fiscal year 2015 

(October 2014). Consistent with the 

requirements of the FD&C Act, the final 

rule requires the submission of this 

information to FDA instead of USDA. 

DATES: This rule is effective August 11, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Boocker or Annette Marthaler, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES