alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEITH DEMOND INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-00-783; CA-03-2883) Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Demond Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Keith Demond Ingram seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ingram has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Republic of the Marshall Islands Constitution Day

# 									Republic of the Marshall Islands Constitution Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 30, 2021

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I congratulate the citizens of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on your 42nd Constitution Day.  The United States and the Marshall Islands share a historic friendship underpinned by our Compact of Free Association, and I look forward to strengthening the deep bonds between our nations and citizens.

Building on a foundation of democracy and support for human rights, our countries collaborate at many levels.  From our close cooperation at the United Nations to coordination among our health care experts on delivering COVID-19 vaccines, the relationship between our two countries is essential for achieving our shared goals.

Through the bonds between our citizens and the strong partnership between our governments, together we will continue to confront the climate crisis, work to defeat COVID-19 and prevent future pandemics, and promote regional security for a better future.  Again, I extend my congratulations to all Marshallese on this occasion.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsMarshall IslandsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>


This Schedule contains summary financial information taken from the balance 
sheet as of March 31, 1998 (unaudited) and the statement of operations for 
the nine-month period ended March 31, 1998 (unaudited) and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 
the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997.
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-M0S
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUNE-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                   6,048,597
<SECURITIES>                                 (0)
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,997,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (0)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         9,058,454
<PP&E>                                     727,695
<DEPRECIATION>                             700,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          12,752,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      799,436
<BONDS>                                      (0)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        (0)
<PREFERRED>                                  (0)
<COMMON>                                 8,952,983
<OTHER-SE>                               2,082,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            12,752,362
<SALES>                                    426,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,065,370
<CGS>                                      234,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              234,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,449,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (0)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (0)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (618,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (234,937)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (0)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (0)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (0)
<CHANGES>                                    (0)
<NET-INCOME>                              (383,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### John S. Bacon, Respondent, *v.*Letitia Combes, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

L. L. G. Benedict, for appellant.

John J. O’Brien, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff testified that defendant said, in May, that she would come in the next month as soon as she could get packed up and ready. He also testified that the arrangement was with the defendant, “ all to take effect a few weeks later when she sold her piano, and after she had packed up to move.”

In view of this evidence, there should have been no finding of a renting prior to July first, as it did not appear until July first that defendant failed to come in June.

The evidence of Murel Bacon showed that some one else moved into the premises in the beginning of August, and so there should have been no allowance of rent for August.

The expense for carpet cleaning is not recoverable, as it was not a damage caused by a breach of the agreement.

Plaintiff is not entitled to costs, as it does not appear that he had an attorney actually engaged in the prosecution of the action. Subd. 3, § 1420, Consol. Act.

The judgment is modified so as to be for fourteen dollars damages, and the prospective charges and fees allowed by law (see § 1420), and as modified is affirmed.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment modified and as modified affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act; Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and section 166(h)(4) of the 
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is hereby 
given of the next meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council (NAETC), as constituted under WIA.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Monday, 
November 2, 2009, and continue until 4:30 p.m. that day. The meeting 
will reconvene at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 3, 2009, and adjourn 
at 5 p.m. that day. The period from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on November 
3, 2009 will be reserved for participation and presentations by members 
of the public.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Brown Hotel, 335 West 
Broadway, Louisville, Kentucky 40202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Members of the public not present may submit a written statement on or 
before October 30, 2009, to be included in the record of the meeting. 
Statements are to be submitted to Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, 
Designated Federal Official (DFO), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-4209, Washington, DC 20210. Persons 
who need special accommodations should contact Mr. Craig Lewis at (202) 
693-3384, at least two business days before the meeting. The formal 
agenda will focus on the following topics: (1) U.S. Department of 
Labor, Indian and Native American Program Update; (2) PY 2009-PY 2010 
Strategic Planning; (3) Training and Technical Assistance; (4) 
Community of Practice; (5) 2010 Census; (6) Native American and 
Employment Training Council Workgroup Reports; (7) Council Update; and 
(8) Council Recommendations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, DFO, 
Indian and Native American Program, Employment and Training 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4209, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number (202) 693-3737 
(VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of September 2009.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-23918 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### David Steckler, Respondent, v. Jonas V. Spero, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment and order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan. Louis Alexander, for appellant: David Steckler, respondent in person. Judgment reversed, with costs, and appeal from order dismissed,with ten dollars costs.

No opinion.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-39215, 333-26153, 333-17299, 333-15181, 33-80706 and 33-
65756) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan of OPTi, Inc. of
our report dated January 28, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of OPTi Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Jose, California
March 30, 1999
#### § 4.123 Neuritis, cranial or peripheral.

Neuritis, cranial or peripheral, characterized by loss of reflexes, muscle atrophy, sensory disturbances, and constant pain, at times excruciating, is to be rated on the scale provided for injury of the nerve involved, with a maximum equal to severe, incomplete, paralysis. See nerve involved for diagnostic code number and rating. The maximum rating which may be assigned for neuritis not characterized by organic changes referred to in this section will be that for moderate, or with sciatic nerve involvement, for moderately severe, incomplete paralysis.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of SkyWest, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Atkin, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Jerry C. Atkin      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Jerry C. Atkin          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 8, 2008     |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. AF 06-0263

IN THE MATTER OF THE COURTS OF

LIMITED JURISDICTION

FILED

MAR 2 4 2020

Bowen Greenwo00

Clerk of Supr-scoe Court

O R D c" gv'--f

The Montana Supreme Court's Commission on Courts of Limited Jurisdiction met

on March 20, 2020. The Commission discussed the request of the Court Administrator's

Office to cancel or postpone the statutorily mandated biannual training conference for

limited jurisdiction judges, scheduled for April 27-30, 2020, in light of the ongoing

COVID 19 Pandemic and governmental responses.

The Commission determined that a postponement to a later date, such as during

summer, was not feasible, given that training sessions are scheduled far in advance to allow

judges to set court schedules around the dates of the sessions. The Commission also

determined that it was not feasible to transfer the training to online platforms in time for

the conference. Consequently, after discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to

request permission from the Court to cancel the Spring 2020 training conference and grant

the judges a waiver from the biannual training requirement, pursuant to Sections

3-10-203(3) and 3-11-204(2), MCA.

Under these statutes, the Supreme Court may waive the attendance of limited

jurisdiction judges at training sessions "because of illness, a death in the family, or any

other good cause." Good cause appearing because of the COVID 19 Pandemic and

governmental responses thereto,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all Montana limited court judges and justices are

excused from attendance at the first biannual training session for 2020, scheduled for

April 27-30, 2020. Attendance at the second biannual training session for 2020, now

scheduled for September 2020, shall remain mandatory except upon the granting of

individual waivers by the Commission or until further order of the Court.

03/24/2020

Case Number: AF 06-0263
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Supreme Court's

Commission on Courts of Limited Jurisdiction and to the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this Z-1 ‘1"\- ay of March, 2020.

Chief Justice

/Goy

(94 A4 

Justices

41-L.

2
# C_2023003EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 January 2023

(2023/C 3/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0599 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4374 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88076 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1653 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9843 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 395,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6685 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9264 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 19,8670 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5452 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4363 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2864 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6775 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4212 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 348,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8349 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2985 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 504,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6641 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,330 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,047 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,7758 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4494 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,7910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0599

JPY

Japanese yen

138,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4374

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88076

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1653

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9843

ISK

Iceland króna

151,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

395,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6685

RON

Romanian leu

4,9264

TRY

Turkish lira

19,8670

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5452

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4363

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2864

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6775

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4212

KRW

South Korean won

1 348,95

ZAR

South African rand

17,8349

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2985

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 504,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6641

PHP

Philippine peso

59,330

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,047

BRL

Brazilian real

5,7758

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4494

INR

Indian rupee

87,7910

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2619 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2619

To provide for the expansion of Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2003

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the expansion of Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kilauea Point National Wildlife 
Refuge Expansion Act of 2003'' .

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF KILAUEA POINT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may acquire all or a 
portion of the land or interests in land described in subsection (b), 
as depicted on a map on file with the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service entitled ``Kilauea Point Wildlife Refuge Expansion Area'' and 
dated ________ , 2003.
    (b) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the following:
            (1) Parcel 1, consisting of approximately 12 acres known as 
        the Kilauea Bay property.
            (2) Parcel 2, consisting of approximately 45 acres known as 
        the Kilauea Vistas property.
            (3) Parcel 3, consisting of approximately 162 acres known 
        as the Kilauea Falls Ranch.
    (c) Boundary Revisions.--The Secretary may make such minor 
revisions in the boundaries of any of the parcels described in 
subsection (b) as may be appropriate to facilitate the acquisition of 
land or interests under subsection (a).
    (d) Inclusion in Refuge.--Land and interests acquired under this 
section shall become part of the Kilauea Point National Wildlife 
Refuge.
    (e) Refuge Purposes.--Upon acquisition of any land or interest in 
land described in subsection (b), the purposes of the Kilauea Point 
National Wildlife Refuge shall include--
            (1) the protection and recovery of endangered Hawaiian 
        waterbirds and the endangered Nene (Hawaiian goose); and
            (2) the conservation and management of native coastal 
        strand, riparian, and aquatic biological diversity.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.15 Payments under the grant. ( a ) *Payments to grantees.* Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and manner set forth in the NOFA.
( b ) *Payments to subgrantees.* Payments of grant funds by grantees to subgrantees (including entities with which the grantee has entered into a partnership) for instruction, participation, and competition in sports may only be made for instruction, participation, and competition in Paralympic sports.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 521A)
# C_2022011EN.01000101.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2022/C 11/01)

Last publication

OJ C 2, 3.1.2022

Past publications

OJ C 513, 20.12.2021

OJ C 502, 13.12.2021

OJ C 490, 6.12.2021

OJ C 481, 29.11.2021

OJ C 471, 22.11.2021

OJ C 462, 15.11.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-621.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NARCOTIC DRUGS 

Cooperating Nation Information 

Exchange System 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BELIZE 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Belize City June 20 and 21, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 BELIZE 

 Narcotic Drugs: Cooperating Nation 

 Information Exchange System 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Belize City June 20 and 21, 2005; 

 Entered into force June 21, 2005. 


NOTE: Edit in the second paragraph on this page was done by the United States Embassy in Belize.