alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         527,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               845,348
<PP&E>                                      16,728,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,475,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,625,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          690,607
<BONDS>                                     12,285,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,350,291)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,625,552
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,700,380
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,926,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             833,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.52)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>This entity ia a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS - Primary line represents net loss per limited partnership unit.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
§ 1807.403 Economic Development Activities. A CMF Award used for Economic Development Activities must stabilize, sustain, or revitalize communities and neighborhoods to meet the requirements set forth herein. For each individual CMF Award round, the Recipient may use no more than 30 percent of its CMF Award for Economic Development Activities, if such use is approved in its applicable Assistance Agreement. ( a ) *Eligible uses.* A Recipient may use its Economic Development Activity Fund to finance and/or support Economic Development Activities through any Eligible Use pursuant to § 1807.301 except for Affordable Housing Fund.
( b ) *Minimum use Term.* Community Service Facilities or physical structures resulting from Economic Development Activities must be used for allowable Economic Development Activities for a minimum of three years commencing with Project Completion.
( c ) *Concerted strategy.* Economic Development Activities must complement and be undertaken as part of a Concerted Strategy that includes, but is not limited to, education, employment, transportation, financial services, commercial goods and services and other opportunities in a Low-Income Area or Underserved Rural Area.
( d ) *In Conjunction with Affordable Housing Activities.* Economic Development Activities must be: ( 1 ) Located in a Low-Income Area or Underserved Rural Area;
( 2 ) Undertaken in conjunction with any affordable housing that is subject to or authorized by local, State or Federal laws; and
( 3 ) Reasonably available, physically proximate, and benefit residents of such affordable housing. For a Metropolitan Area, the Economic Development Activities must be located within the same census tract or within one mile of such affordable housing. For a Non-Metropolitan Area, Economic Development Activities must be located within the same county, township, or village, or within 10 miles of such affordable housing.
#### DONNER STEEL CO. v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 209; 270 U. S. 643]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court February 1, 1926.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2239

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for vocational rehabilitation benefits administered by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2239 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Early Access to Voca3 tional Rehabilitation and Employment Benefits Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VOCATIONAL RE5 HABILITATION BENEFITS ADMINISTERED BY 

6 THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

7 Section 3102 of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

10 end; 

11 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

12 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(3) the person—

16 ‘‘(A) at the time of the Secretary’s deter17 mination under subparagraph (B), is a member 

18 of the Armed Forces who is hospitalized or re19 ceiving outpatient medical care, services, or 

20 treatment; 

21 ‘‘(B) is determined by the Secretary to 

22 have a total disability permanent in nature in23 curred or aggravated in the line of duty in the 

24 active military, naval, or air service; and 
3

•HR 2239 EH

1 ‘‘(C) is likely to be discharged or released 

2 from such service for such disability.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2239

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand 

fairs.administered by the Secretary of Veterans Afeligibility for vocational rehabilitation benefits
§ 71.10 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part implements the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers, which, among other things, provides certain benefits to eligible veterans who have incurred or aggravated serious injuries during military service, and to their caregivers. This part also implements the Program of General Caregiver Support Services, which provides support services to caregivers of covered veterans from all eras who are enrolled in the VA health care system.
( b ) *Scope.* This part regulates the provision of benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers and the Program of General Caregiver Support Services authorized by 38 U.S.C. 1720G. Persons eligible for such benefits may be eligible for other VA benefits based on other laws or other parts of this title. These benefits are provided only to those individuals residing in a State as that term is defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(20).
[76 FR 26172, May 5, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 1376, Jan. 9, 2015; 85 FR 46293, July 31, 2020]
# C_2022100EN.01003601.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/36

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 100/04)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by France

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: France

Subject of commemoration: The 90th anniversary of President Jacques Chirac’s birth

Description of the design: President of the French Republic for two terms, Jacques Chirac was a major architect of the European construction. As such, he was President when the Euro was introduced in 2002, whose 20th anniversary we celebrate at the beginning of this year.

The design shows a solemn profile of President Jacques Chirac looking towards the future. He is surrounded by several symbols representing his actions: a euro symbol, as sign of his involvement in the introduction of the Euro and his European spirit, and a French flag represented in heraldic colours, itself embellished with the RF as a reference to his presidency. His dates and name are inserted in the Euro’s logo. The mintmarks as well as the year date fit into the design.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 9 000 000

Date of issue: January 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AWH ORLANDO MEMBER, LLC, a §

Delaware limited liability company, § No. 78, 2018

§ 

Defendant Below, § Court Below—Court of Chancery of 

Appellant, § the State of Delaware

§

v. § C.A. No. 2017-0708

§

REJV5 AWH ORLANDO, LLC, a §

Delaware limited liability company, §

§

Plaintiff Below, § 

Appellee, § 

§ 

and §

§

AWH ORLANDO HOLDING, LLC, a §

Delaware limited liability company, §

§

Nominal Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: March 1, 2018

Decided: March 26, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

O R D E R

The appellant seeks interlocutory review of certain rulings that do not entirely 

resolve the case. In a detailed letter opinion, the Court of Chancery explained why 

interlocutory review is not required to protect the appellant from irreparable injury 

and why the costs of interlocutory review outweigh the potential benefits.1 

 

1 REJV5 AWH Orlando, LLC v. AWH Orlando Member, LLC, 2018 WL 1109650 (Del. Chan. Feb. 

28, 2018).
2

Interlocutory review under Supreme Court Rule 42 is addressed to the sound 

discretion of the Court.2 In this case, we agree with the Court of Chancery’s 

reasoning, in its February 28, 2018 letter opinion, that Rule 42(b)’s principles and 

criteria do not weigh in favor of interlocutory review.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is 

REFUSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice 

 

2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).
ZAYNUS C. CRAWFORD

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4363

Opinion filed October 21, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original Jurisdiction

.
Zaynus C. Crawford, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ.

, CONCUR.
#### Isaac D. Zeeman et al., Respondents, *v.*Joseph Rosenthal, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs.

Louis Levy, for appellant.

Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The promise of defendant was not a promise to answer for the debt or default of another. It was an original promise. It was not necessary that it should have been in writing.

We think that no error was committed, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# 12-70014 Narjaryan v. Holder

KLEINFELD and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges; and KENNELLY (Illinois Northern), District Judge

null

978.2088

eng - iTunPGAP0��

eng - iTunNORM 0000013C 00000000 00005C56 00000000 0002BDF0 00000000 00004FBF 00000000 0002D534 00000000�

eng - iTunSMPB 00000000 00000210 000004F0 0000000001491200 00000000 003BB000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000�
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6029

STANLEY D. LINDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ISAAC MCDUFFIE STONE, III, District Attorney; HARRIS BEACH, 

Attorney; SEAN THORNTON, Solicitor; PATRICIA C. GRANT, Clerk 

of Court,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:15-cv-04619-RMG)

Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley D. Linder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stanley D. Linder seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint 

for failing to plead, at least as to one count, sufficient facts 

to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). 

An order dismissing a complaint without prejudice is not an 

appealable final order if “the plaintiff could save his action by 

merely amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar 

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 

Where a district court dismisses an action for failure to plead 

sufficient facts in the complaint, we lack appellate jurisdiction 

because the plaintiff could amend the complaint to cure the 

pleading deficiency. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 

807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015). 

Accordingly, we deny Linder’s motion to appoint counsel,

dismiss the appeal, and remand the case to the district court with 

instructions to allow Linder to file an amended complaint. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 
3

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
§ 151.150 How do my officers and employees file reports of personal securities trading transactions? An officer or employee described in § 151.140(d) must report all personal transactions in securities made by or on behalf of the officer or employee if he or she has a beneficial interest in the security. ( a ) *Contents and filing of report.* The officer or employee must file the report with you no later than 30 calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter. The report must include the following information: ( 1 ) The date of each transaction, the title and number of shares, the interest rate and maturity date (if applicable), and the principal amount of each security involved.
( 2 ) The nature of each transaction (i.e., purchase, sale, or other type of acquisition or disposition).
( 3 ) The price at which each transaction was effected.
( 4 ) The name of the broker, dealer, or other intermediary effecting the transaction.
( 5 ) The date the officer or employee submitted the report.
( b ) *Report not required for certain transactions.* Your officer or employee is not required to report a transaction if: ( 1 ) He or she has no direct or indirect influence or control over the account for which the transaction was effected or over the securities held in that account;
( 2 ) The transaction was in shares issued by an open-end investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
( 3 ) The transaction was in direct obligations of the government of the United States;
( 4 ) The transaction was in bankers' acceptances, bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper or high quality short term debt instruments, including repurchase agreements; or
( 5 ) The officer or employee had an aggregate amount of purchases and sales of $10,000 or less during the calendar quarter.
( c ) *Alternate report.* When you act as an investment adviser to an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, an officer or employee that is an “access person” may fulfill his or her reporting requirements under this section by filing with you the “access person” personal securities trading report required by SEC Rule 17j-1(d), 17 CFR 270.17j-1(d).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Building blocks for fatherinvolvement [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 25.2:F 26/BLOCK 1-5

Item Number:0524-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000745479
 
Volumes: 0102030405
 
April 8, 2020
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.36 Oral presentations. ( a ) *In general.* A party does not have a right to an oral presentation. Under this section, a party's request to make an oral presentation may be denied if such a denial is appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances. An oral presentation shall be considered as an opportunity to offer, emphasize and clarify the facts, policies and laws concerning the proceeding.
( b ) *Method and time of request.* Between the commencement of the proceeding and ten days before the end of the information-gathering phase, any party to the proceeding may file with the Secretary a letter requesting that the Secretary schedule an opportunity for the party to give an oral presentation to the ASC. That letter shall include the reasons why an oral presentation is necessary.
( c ) *ASC processing.* The Secretary must promptly forward the letter request to the Chairman of the ASC. The Chairman, after informally contacting other ASC members and the ASC's senior staff for their views, will instruct the Secretary to forward a letter to the party either: Scheduling a date and time for the oral presentation and specifying the allowable duration of the presentation; or declining the request and providing the reasons therefor. The party's letter request and the ASC's response will be included in the proceeding's public file.
( d ) *Procedure on presentation day.* On the appropriate date and time, the party or his or her attorney (if any) will make the oral presentation before the ASC. Any ASC member may ask the party or the attorney, as the case may be, pertinent questions relating to the content of the oral presentation. Oral presentations will not be recorded or otherwise transcribed. The Secretary must enter promptly into the proceeding's public file a memorandum summarizing the subjects discussed during the oral presentation.
James Turner/R6/USEPA/US 

11/30/2005 03:14 PM 

To Rebamburg@aol.com 

cc 

bcc 

Subject Fw: Rogers Rd Easement 

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 

Bob, I have a break from my work on the Hercules appeal and wanted to check in with you on the 

easement document. When we last communicated you were going to run the draft of Ex. B that I put 

together on existing site uses, past the Gentry's son. Have you done so, and are they Ok with it, or do 

they have suggested changes? Please advise. Thanks and take care. 

James L, Turner 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-S) 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445R0SS Avenue, Ste, 1200 , 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

E-Mail: Turner,James@epa,gov • 

Ph: (214)665-3159 

Fax:(214)665-6460 

Fonwarded by James Turner/R6/USEPA/US on 11/30/2005 03:07 PM • 

James Turner/R6/USEPA/US 

^ 11/16/2005 09:51 AM To Rebamburg@aol.com 

cc 

Subject Re: Fw: Rogers Rd EasementB 

Yes, assuming you are discussing the description of property uses, please do. 

from you after they have seen it. Thanks and take care. 

James L. Turner 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-S) 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste, 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

^E-Mail: Turner.James@epa.gov 

Ph: (214)665-3159 

Fax: (214) 665-6460 

will look forwrd to hearing 

9050345 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 

Rebamburg@aol.com 

Rebamburg@aol.com 

11/16/2005 09:24 AM To James Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 

cc 

Subject Re: Fw: Rogers Rd Easement 

002302
Jim: 

Sounds good to me; do you want me to run it by the owners of the property for their review? 

Let me know, and I'll forward it to their son, who is helping them understand the circumstances. He's a 

former Alderman for the City, and he's been quite helpful in getting the material reviewed and explained to 

his parents. 

Thanks, 

Bob ' 

City of Jacksonville, Arkansas 

By: Robert E, Bamburg 

City Attorney 

P, O, Box 5913 

Jacksonville, AR 72078 

501-982-6303 (Phone) 

501-982-2280 (Fax) 

rebamburq(a)aol,com 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email 

and any attachments contain confidential 

and privileged information intended solely 

for the intended recipient If you are not 

the intended recipient,.please do not 

review, retransmit, copy, or convert any of 

this information. If received in error, 

please notify me and delete this message. 

002303
§ 1807.303 Authorized uses of Program Income. ( a ) Program Income earned in the form of principal and equity repayments must be used by the Recipient in the manner further set forth in the Assistance Agreement.
( b ) Program Income earned in the form of interest payments, and all other forms of Program Income (except for that which is earned as described in paragraph (a) of this section), must be used by the Recipient as set forth in the Assistance Agreement and in accordance with 2 CFR part 200.
#### SUN SHIPBUILDING CO. v. UNITED STATES KENILWORTH CO. v. UNITED STATES DORRIS MOTOR CAR CO. v. UNITED STATES

[59 C. Cls. 757; *id.*156; 60 C. Cls. 68; 271 U. S. 96]

Judgments were rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgments were *affirmed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

Judgments of the Court of Olaims rejecting claims because -settled by agreement or manifestly not justified under the contracts involved, *held*clearly correct.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 19, 1926.
#### § 157.11 To what extent does Federal law preempt deposit-related state laws?

State law applies to the deposit activities of Federal savings associations and their subsidiaries to the same extent and in the same manner that those laws apply to national banks and their subsidiaries.
#### § 1239.21 Compensation of Enterprise board members.

Each Enterprise may pay its directors reasonable and appropriate compensation for the time required of them, and their necessary and reasonable expenses, in the performance of their duties.