alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (the “Company”),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company        for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 (the “Quarterly Report”)        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                     |

| Date: October 19, 2004 | By:    | */s/ Garry L. Anselmo*      |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   |                             |
|                   | Name:  | Garry L. Anselmo            |
|                   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |

*This written statement is being furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the  Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on  Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall  not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,  as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically  incorporates it by reference.*

----
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0582 Focus Ready Draft 9/3/2009 ENGINEER: Hall \ JAS PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE

OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: No

CRSS : Chemical Name:
S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: 0.00%<500 0.00%<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM] Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (08/28/2009): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T1 Health: 1-2 Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0582file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0582file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM] CBI: MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: Jason A. Sese Organization: ERG CALL TO: Organization:file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM] Date: 08/31/2009 Time: 1:15pm Phone: Concerning BI? PMN: 09-0582
#### § 21.7630 Educational assistance.

VA will pay educational assistance pursuant to 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 to an eligible reservist while he or she is pursuing approved courses in a program of education at the rates specified in § 21.7636 and § 21.7639.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16131(b); Pub. L. 98-525)

[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 CITY OF ROSWELL,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,829

5 OLGA FUENTES,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY

8 James M. Hudson, District Judge

9 Paul V. Sanchez

10 Roswell, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Jesse R. Cosby, P.C.

13 Jesse R. Cosby

14 Roswell, NM 

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 HANISEE, Judge.
2

1 {1} Defendant appeals her conviction for violating a City of Roswell municipal

2 ordinance that outlaws obstructing a peace officer while the officer is in the lawful

3 performance of his duties. We issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to

4 affirm, and Defendant has filed a response indicating she has decided not to challenge

5 the Court’s proposed affirmance. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of

6 proposed disposition, we affirm Defendant’s conviction. 

7 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 

9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 

12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 

13 

14 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
§ 1006.26 Collection of time-barred debts. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Statute of limitations* means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt.
( 2 ) *Time-barred debt* means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired.
( b ) *Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited.* A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
[86 FR 5854, Jan. 19, 2021]
# C_2017305EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8570 — CTDI EU/Regenersis EMEA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 305/01)

On 1 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8570. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8570. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
§ 21.7302 Finality of decisions. ( a ) *Agency decisions generally are binding.* The decision of a VA facility of original jurisdiction on which an action is based— ( 1 ) Will be final,
( 2 ) Will be binding upon all field offices of the VA as to conclusions based on evidence on file at that time, and
( 3 ) Will not be subject to revision on the same factual grounds except by duly constituted appellate authorities or except as provided in § 21.7303 of this part. (See §§ 19.192 and 19.193 of this chapter). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 511)
( b ) *Decisions of an activity within VA.* Current determinations of line of duty and other pertinent elements of eligibility for a program of education made by either an Adjudicative activity or an Insurance activity by application of the same criteria and based on the same facts are binding one upon the other in the absence of clear and unmistakable error. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 511)
( c ) *Character of discharge determinations.* ( 1 ) A determination of the character of a veteran's discharge made by a competent military or naval authority or by the Coast Guard is binding upon VA.
( 2 ) Any determination of the character of a veteran's discharge made by VA in connection with the veteran's eligibility for a benefit other than educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, shall not affect his or her eligibility for educational assistance.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3011(a), 3012(a); Pub. L. 98-525)
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0810 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM195AD

AOT A330 - 32A3256 --- 8/24/11 AOT A340 - 32A4292 --- 8/24/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### M **AY BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                      61,675,000
<SECURITIES>                                47,532,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,838,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,129,000
<INVENTORY>                                 48,057,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           206,489,000
<PP&E>                                      53,576,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,305,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             259,030,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,129,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,351,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 177,664,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               259,030,000
<SALES>                                    267,834,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           267,834,000
<CGS>                                      197,178,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              197,178,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             31,846,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,896,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,950,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,950,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69
        

</TABLE>
#### The Farmers’ Feed Co., Appellant, *v.*The David Stevenson Brewing Co., Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.

Paskusz *&*Oohen (Martin Paskusz, of counsel), for appellant.

William G. McOrea, for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

The complaint sets forth a good cause of action. It was error to dismiss it.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant.

*’ Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and Schuchman, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant.
**EXHIBIT 11-1**

 

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

 

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents

 

*($ and shares inthousands, except per share data)*

 
|                                                                |   | **Three  Months Ended  June 30,** |   | **Six Months  Ended  June 30,** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                |   | **2004**                          |   | **2003**                        |   | **2004** |   | **2003** |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income applicable to common stock                               |   | $                                 | 9,037  |                            | $      | 6,157 |   | $ | 17,950 |   | $ | 10,867 |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average number of common shares outstanding                         |   | 12,587                            |   | 8,516                           |   | 12,570 |   | 8,505 |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income per share - Basic                                        |   | $                                 | 0.72   |                            | $      | 0.72 |   | $ | 1.43 |   | $ | 1.28 |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average number of common shares outstanding                         |   | 12,587                            |   | 8,516                           |   | 12,570 |   | 8,505 |   |
| Add: Assumed exercise of stock options and  vesting of stock grants |   | 60                                |   | 134                             |   | 101 |   | 128 |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Common and common equivalent shares  outstanding                    |   | 12,647                            |   | 8,650                           |   | 12,671 |   | 8,633 |   |
|                                                                |   |                              |   |                            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income per share - Diluted                                      |   | $                                 | 0.71   |                            | $      | 0.71 |   | $ | 1.42 |   | $ | 1.26 |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                                    ------------

                       AMENDMENT TO K*TEC GENERAL MANAGER
                        STOCK OPTION PLAN AND AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to K*TEC General Manager Stock Option Plan and Agreement
(the "Plan"), is effective as of the 2nd day of July, 1997 (the "Effective
Date"), between Kent Electronics Corporation, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), and Rodney J. Corporron (the "Optionee").

     WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Plan effective May 1, 1993; and

     WHEREAS, on July 2, 1997, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved certain amendments to the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises herein, this
Amendment to the Plan further evidences the amendment of the Plan as follows:

     1.   Amendment to the Plan.  The Plan is hereby amended as set forth on
          Exhibit A attached hereto.

     2.   Full Force and Effect.  The Plan, as amended hereby, shall remain in
          full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                              KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION


                              By: /s/ Morrie K. Abramson
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Morrie K. Abramson
                                  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                    Officer and President



ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE:

Optionee:

/s/ Rodney J. Corporron
-------------------------------------
Rodney J. Corporron
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT A

                       AMENDMENT TO K*TEC GENERAL MANAGER
                        STOCK OPTION PLAN AND AGREEMENT

     Section 5 of the K*TEC General Manager Stock Option Plan and Agreement
shall be amended in its entirety to provide for transferability of stock options
as follows:

     5.  Transferability of Option. Except as set forth below, the Option
     granted hereunder shall not be transferable by the Optionee otherwise than
     by will or operation of the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to
     a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of
     the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the
     rules thereunder; provided, however, that the Option may be transferable,
     without payment of consideration, to immediate family members of the
     Optionee or to trusts or partnerships for such family members.
# Official Journal L 110/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 110 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 658 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 110

English edition

Legislation

Volume 658 April 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/580 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 55 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/580 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

3

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

55

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Eldred J. McCabe *v.*W. C. Mason and Company, Inc., et al.

Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued October 16—

decided November 23, 1948

*227
      *Harry Cooper,*with whom was *Frederick J. Rundhaken,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*William E. C. Bulkeley,*for the appellees (defendants) .

Per Curiam.

This is a negligence action arising out of a collision between a passenger car and a truck at a street intersection. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for the defendants. The trial court concluded that the defendants were free from negligence and that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

While the finding is attacked, the evidence supports the following summary of facts: Farmington Avenue, Hartford, runs east and west. Woodland Street intersects it from the north. On July 10, 1946, at about 9:30 p.m., during a rainstorm, the plaintiff was driving west on Farmington Avenue in a passenger car towards the intersection and the defendant Reid was driving a truck for the defendant O’Meara Motors, Inc., east towards it. Farmington Avenue is approximately forty-eight feet wide and Woodland Street is approximately thirty-three feet wide at the intersection. An electric traffic light at the intersection was green for through traffic on Farmington Avenue. Reid, upon reaching the intersection, the plaintiff’s car being then 150 to 200 feet away, displayed the lights on his truck *228signaling a left turn and turned left towards Woodland Street at a speed of 10 to 12 miles an hour. The front end of the truck was about at the Woodland Street crosswalk when the plaintiff’s car struck the rear right side of it, broadside. The plaintiff did not reduce his speed on approaching the intersection, although he said he could have stopped his car in six feet at the rate he was traveling.

While the finding and evidence indicate that Reid was negligent in failing to keep to the right of the intersection of the centers of the highways when turning to the left (Cum. Sup. 1939, § 544e), the facts above recited support the trial court’s conclusion that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in not seeing the truck cross Farmington Avenue and in failing to avoid colliding with it.

There is no error.
#### § 1208.33 Non-waiver of rights by payments.

A debtor's payment, whether voluntary or involuntary, of all or any portion of a debt being collected pursuant to this subpart B shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights that the debtor may have under any statute, regulation, or contract, except as otherwise provided by law or contract.