alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THOMAS POULTON,

Appellant,

v.

VERA BARBOSA,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00170

- CV

Appeal from

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014

- DCV

- 2757)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties have

resolved the dispute. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the m otion and dismiss the appeal.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of

the parties, the c ourt will tax costs against the appellant

. ”).

April 2 2 , 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
RE: Revised package Bill Maxwell to: Higgins, Cortney 11/16/2012 10:46 AM Cc: Peter Tsirigotis, RobertJ Wayland

EO12866 redline 110612 vs 111612.docx

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/16/2012 10:41 AM Subject: RE: Revised package

Hi Bob, Can you send the redline as a word document?

Thanks, Cortney

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 10:28 AM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov; tsirigotis.peter@epa.gov Subject: Fw: Revised package Importance: High

Cortney -

Attached below are three (3) files:

(1) 75% CPMS Memo

(2) Revised preamble/regulatory text(3) Redline of preamble/regulatory text off of what was originally submitted to you via ROCIS versus the current state of the package.

Please let me know if you have any further edits/concerns, and we'll work to get the addresses asap.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/16/2012 10:26 AM

-----

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Pamela Garrett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/16/2012 10:20 AM Subject: Revised package

(See attached file: 75 percent CPMS operating limit_111612.pdf)(See attached file: EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Proposal_20121116.pdf)(See attached file: EO12866 redline 110612 vs 111612.pdf)

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430FAX: 919-541-5450
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 01092

- CR

MELVIN RICHARDSON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1384516

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly

weapon and sentenced on October 23, 2013
, to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was not filed
until December 4, 2013

.2

A defendant ’ s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after an appealable order is entered when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial.
See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Although we may grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, it must be filed in the trial court within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal and, within that same fifteen

- day period, the party must file an extension motion in the appellate court. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 26.3(a), (b). Otherwise, we do not have authority t o grant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

– 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The notice of appeal was filed within the fifteen

- day period, but no extension of time to file the notice of appeal was filed.

A n otice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obt ain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamis on and Wise

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2671 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 North Miami 

Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2007 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MICA, Mr. 

BUCHANAN, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZBALART of Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. KELLER

of Florida, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. PUTNAM, 

Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, Ms. CASTOR, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. BOYD of Florida, Mr. MACK, Mr. 

MAHONEY of Florida, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Ms. 

CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. WELDON

of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 

North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘C. Clyde 

Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse at 301 North Miami 

5 Avenue, Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2671 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

5 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United 

6 States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# Date and Time:

11:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 6, 2009.

# Place:

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters Considered:

The following matter will be considered during the closed meeting:

Petition for reconsideration involving one original jurisdiction case pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

# Agency Contact:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission. (301) 492-5990.

Dated: September 24, 2009.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-23595 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
# Official Journal L 63/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 63 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 586 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 63

English edition

Legislation

Volume 586 March 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/340 of 20 February 2015 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures relating to air traffic controllers' licences and certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/340 of 20 February 2015 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures relating to air traffic controllers' licences and certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21337]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 204 and 252

RIN 0750-AG47
[DFARS Case 2011-D039]

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Safeguarding 
Unclassified DoD Information

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add a new subpart and associated 
contract clauses to address requirements for safeguarding unclassified 
DoD information. The comment period is being extended 93 days to 
provide additional time for interested parties to review the proposed 
DFARS changes.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to 
one of the addresses shown below on or before November 30, 2011, to be 
considered in the formation of the final rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2011-D039, using 
any of the following methods:
    [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments.
    [cir] E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2011-D039 in the 
subject line of the message.
    [cir] Fax: 703-602-0350.
    [cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. 
Julian Thrash, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
    Comments received generally will be posted without change to 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    To confirm receipt of your comment, please check 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days 
after submission to verify posting (except allow 93 days for posting of 
comments submitted by mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Julian Thrash, telephone 703-602-
0310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on June 29, 
2011 (76 FR 38089), with a request for comments by August 29, 2011. DoD 
is extending the comment period for 93 days to provide additional time 
for interested parties to review the proposed DFARS changes.

Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2011-21337 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
```
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2570 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2570 EH

1 SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort 

4 Collins, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2570 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postson Post Office Building’’. Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Car- al Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2587

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 555 South 3rd Street Lobby in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Kenneth 
                     T. Whalum, Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 555 South 3rd Street Lobby in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Kenneth 
                     T. Whalum, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KENNETH T. WHALUM, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 555 South 3rd Street Lobby in Memphis, Tennessee, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kenneth T. Whalum, Sr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kenneth T. 
Whalum, Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 8.21 Applicability. The procedures in this subpart apply when: ( a ) The Secretary has notified an OTP in writing that its certification under the regulations in subpart B of this part has been suspended or that the Secretary proposes to revoke the certification; and
( b ) The OTP has, within 30 days of the date of the notification or within 3 days of the date of the notification when seeking an expedited review of a suspension, requested in writing to the reviewing official, an opportunity for an informal review of the suspension or proposed revocation.
( c ) The Secretary has notified an Accreditation Body of an adverse action taken regarding withdrawal of approval of the Accreditation Body under the regulations in subpart A of this part; and
( d ) The Accreditation Body has, within 30 days of the date of the notification, requested in writing an opportunity for a review of the adverse action.
§ 1070.3 Custodian of records; certification; alternative authority. ( a ) *Custodian of records.* The Chief Operating Officer is the official custodian of all records of the CFPB, including records that are in the possession or control of the CFPB or any CFPB employee.
( b ) *Certification of record.* The Chief Operating Officer may certify the authenticity of any CFPB record or any copy of such record, or the absence thereof, for any purpose, and for or before any duly constituted Federal or State court, tribunal, or agency.
( c ) *Alternative authority.* Any action or determination required or permitted to be done by the Chief Operating Officer may be done by any employee who has been duly designated for this purpose by the Chief Operating Officer.
[83 FR 46084, Sept. 12, 2018]
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 26, 2022 

 
19 

**
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Algeria

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Algeria			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Algeria 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Algeria

During the review period, the government made significant progress by disclosing debt of major state-owned enterprises.  The government published its executive budget proposal and enacted its budget within a reasonable period but did not publish an end-of-year report within a reasonable period.  Information regarding debt obligations was publicly available, but not for allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises.  The government maintained off-budget accounts, though they were subject to public audits.  The information in the budget was generally reliable, and the government published budget execution reports.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and audited the government’s executed budget, except certain military equipment purchases, and published substantive reports online.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Algeria’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing its end-of-year reports within a reasonable period; and
- Publishing additional detail regarding revenues and expenditures in the budget, including for state-owned enterprises.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Algeria 

Tags

AlgeriaBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
42305.

#### SHEPPARD v. SHEPPARD et al.

Argued September 13, 1966

Decided October 10, 1966.

Hall, Judge.

The evidence in this negligence action shows that the injuries of the plaintiff were due to the negligence of the defendant, or to the plaintiff’s own negligence, or to both.

The trial court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the ground that the court charged the jury principles of law relating to unavoidable accident. *Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Jones,*132 Ga. 189, 196 (63 SE 834); *Everett v. Clegg,*213 Ga. 168 (97 SE2d 689); *Toles v. Hair,*83 Ga. App. 144 (63 SE2d 3); accord *Bush v. Skelton,*91 Ga. App. 83, 85 (84 SE2d 835).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*

*452*McCamy, Minor, Vining & Phillips, Joseph T. Tuggle, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mitchell & Mitchell, D. W. Mitchell, Jr.,*for appellee.