alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2614 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in certain 

water projects in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in certain water projects in 

California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

5 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

6 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2614 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 163l. YUCAIPA VALLEY REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY 

2 RENEWAL PROJECT. 

3 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera4 tion with the Yucaipa Valley Water District, may partici5 pate in the design, planning, and construction of projects 

6 to treat impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse im7 paired groundwater, and provide brine disposal within the 

8 Santa Ana Watershed as described in the report submitted 

9 under section 1606. 

10 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

11 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

12 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

13 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

14 shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the 

15 project described in subsection (a). 

16 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

17 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

18 $20,000,000. 

19 ‘‘SEC. 163l. CITY OF CORONA WATER UTILITY, CALI20 FORNIA, WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE 

21 PROJECT. 

22 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera23 tion with the City of Corona Water Utility, California, is 

24 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con25 struction of, and land acquisition for, a project to reclaim 

26 and reuse wastewater, including degraded groundwaters, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 2614 IH

1 within and outside of the service area of the City of Co2 rona Water Utility, California. 

3 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

4 of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 

5 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

6 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

7 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

8 authorized by this section.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of sec10 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

11 inserting after the item relating to section 163l the fol12 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 163l. Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Supply Renewal Project. 

‘‘Sec. 163l. City of Corona Water Utility, California, water recycling and 

reuse project.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000595

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

PATRICIA L. HUNT, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

WAILUKU DIVISION

(CASE NO. 2DTI-20-009913)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, we lack appellate

jurisdiction over self-represented Defendant-Appellant

Patricia L. Hunt's (Hunt) appeal from Criminal No. 2DTI-20-009913

in the District Court of the Second Circuit, Wailuku Division

(district court).

It is unclear from the notice of appeal which of the

district court's rulings Hunt seeks to appeal. If she seeks to

appeal from the district court's Judgment entered on June 2,

2020, the appeal is untimely because Hunt did not file her

October 5, 2020 notice of appeal within thirty days after entry

of the Judgment, as Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rule 4(b)(1) requires. Further, Hunt's motion for

reconsideration, filed on June 22, 2020, did not extend the

appeal deadline. See HRAP Rule 4(b)(2) (providing that in

criminal appeals, only motions under HRPP Rule 33 and 34 extend

the deadline to file the notice of appeal).

If Hunt seeks to appeal from the district court's

June 29, 2020 post-judgment order denying Hunt's "Motion to

Request Trial for Tickets," the appeal is likewise untimely

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000595

10-NOV-2020

09:02 AM

Dkt. 7 ODSLJ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

because Hunt's notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days

after entry of that order. 

There is no indication in the record that the district

court granted Hunt an extension of time to file the notice of

appeal, under HRAP Rule 4(b)(2).

"As a general rule, compliance with the requirement of

the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional, . . .

and we must dismiss an appeal on our motion if we lack

jurisdiction." Grattafiori v. State, 79 Hawai#i 10, 13, 897 P.2d

937, 940 (1995) (citations, internal quotation marks, and

brackets omitted). See HRAP Rule 26(b) ("[N]o court or judge or

justice is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements

contained in Rule 4 of these rules.").

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 10, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge 

2
#### Matter of the Examination of John W. Thompson, a Judgment Debtor, etc.

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, vacating and setting aside an order adjudging the judgment debtor herein guilty of contempt.

White & Otheman, for appellant.

Edwin F. Stern, for respondent.

*803
      *Per Curiam.*

The examination of the judgment debtor shows what property he possessed, all of which, except those chattels exempt from levy, he was willing should be turned over to a receiver. The Special Term justice, in addition, made the usual allowance of thirty dollars’ costs to the judgment creditor’s attorney. It was not intended by such provision to impose more than the burden usually imposed upon a judgment debtor .when property of his has been discovered as in this instance; that is to say, that an allowance of thirty dollars was made to the judgment creditor’s attorney, to be taken out of the proceeds of funds realized out of such property.

In this case the Special Term justice declared him guilty of contempt because of his failure to pay such thirty dollars and an order to that effect was entered. Another Special Term justice reversed said order, hence this appeal. We think the reversal was right. It was only intended, as before stated, to make the allowance usually made in these proceedings and payable in the same manner. There was no apparent reason for departing in this instance from this rule.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, but without costs or disbursements to either party.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J., Cohxah and■ O’Dwyer, JJ.

Order affirmed, without costs to either party.
§ 38.755 Grant agreement. After a grant is approved for award, VA will draft a grant agreement to be executed by VA and the grantee. Upon execution of the grant agreement, VA will obligate the grant amount. The grant agreement will provide that the recipient agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient (if applicable) agrees, to: ( a ) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of §§ 38.710 through 38.785, 2 CFR part 200, and the applicant's VLGP application;
( b ) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as VA may establish in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement for purposes of carrying out the VLGP project in an effective and efficient manner; and
( c ) Provide additional information that VA requests with respect to: ( 1 ) Program effectiveness, as defined in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement;
( 2 ) Compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement; and
( 3 ) Criteria for evaluation, as defined in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GerardE. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | February 5, 2007                      |   | /s/ Gerard E. Puorro |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Gerard E. Puorro                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23526]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / 
Notices

[[Page 50162]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors 
Meeting

    Time: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Place: African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I 
Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.
    Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009.
    Status:
1. Open session, Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.; and
2. Closed session, Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.

    Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals 
wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Michele 
M. Rivard at (202) 673-3916 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0cdd2c9d6c1d2c4e0d5d3c1c4c68ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8859a819e899a8ca89d9b898c8ec68f879e">[email protected]</span></a> of your request to 
attend by 5 p.m. on Thursday, October 8, 2009.

Lloyd O. Pierson,
President.
[FR Doc. E9-23526 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exh 10.39






Exhibit 10.39






January 2, 2015


Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq.
140 East 28th Street
#11C
New York, NY  10106
Dear Catherine:
This letter serves as an amendment (the “Amendment”) to  your employment agreement dated as of January 26, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as thereafter amended by amendments on January 9, 2008, August 29, 2008,  reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009, extended on July 7, 2010, extended on January 6, 2012, extended on  November 12, 2012, extended on July 12, 2013, amended on March 11, 2014 and amended on August 4, 2014 and further extended on October 27, 2014 (the 2007 Agreement as so amended and extended, the “Original Agreement”) with respect to your service to the Company as its General Counsel.  This Extension shall become effective (the “Effective Date”) as of January 1, 2015 and shall modify the Original Agreement with respect to those different and additional terms as set forth below.  
		
	1.
	Your Base Salary shall be a minimum of $310,800, reviewed annually.


NeoStem, Inc.
By:/s/ Robin L. Smith
Name:Robin L. Smith
Title: CEO
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
/s/ Catherine M. Vaczy
Catherine M. Vaczy
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  IGENE Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
March  31,  2009,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  (the "Report"), I, Stephen F. Hiu, President  of  the
Registrant,  certify  pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

          (2).  The  information contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Date: May 15, 2009                 By: /S/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                       __________________________
                                           Stephen F. Hiu
                                           President


A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 8.19 Beneficiary and optional settlement changes. ( a ) The insured shall have the right at any time, and from time to time, and without the knowledge or consent of the beneficiary to cancel or change a beneficiary and/or optional settlement designation. A change of beneficiary or optional settlement to be effective must be made by notice in writing signed by the insured and forwarded to the Department of Veterans Affairs by the insured or designated agent, and must contain sufficient information to identify the insured. A beneficiary designation and an optional settlement selection, but not a change of beneficiary, may be made by last will and testament duly probated. Upon receipt by the Department of Veterans Affairs, a valid designation or change of beneficiary or option shall be deemed to be effective as of the date of execution. Any payment made before proper notice of designation or change of beneficiary has been received in the Department of Veterans Affairs shall be deemed to have been properly made and to satisfy fully the obligations of the United States under such insurance policy to the extent of such payments.
( b ) If a beneficiary has been determined to have intentionally and wrongfully killed the insured, the provisions found in 38 CFR 9.5(e) shall be followed.
[61 FR 29293, June 10, 1996. Redesignated at 65 FR 7437, Feb. 15, 2000; 87 FR 73654, Dec. 1 ,2022]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                            Anika Therapeutics, Inc.
           Computation of Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Four Month        Fiscal
                                               Year            Year            Year
                                               Ended          Ended           Ended
                                                 December 31,                August 31,
                                               1997            1996            1996
                                             -----------------------------------------
BASIC:

<S>                                          <C>          <C>             <C>
Net income (loss):                           $3,344,437   ($2,657,599)    ($2,848,879)

Dividend on preferred                           103,035        79,045         224,605
                                             ------------------------  --------------
Net income (loss) per common share:           3,241,402    (2,736,644)     (3,073,484)
Weighted average number of common
  shares as adjusted                          5,436,474     4,905,381       4,052,660
                                             ------------------------  --------------
Basic earnings (loss) per share                   $0.60        ($0.56)         ($0.76)
                                             ========================  ==============
DILUTED:

Net income (loss):                           $3,344,437   ($2,657,599)    ($2,848,879)

Dividend on preferred                                --            --              --
                                             ----------------------------------------
Net income (loss) per common share:           3,344,437    (2,657,599)     (2,848,879)
Weighted average number of common
 shares as adjusted for potentially
 diluted shares                               7,587,393     4,905,381       4,052,660
                                             ------------------------  --------------

Diluted earnings(loss) per share                  $0.44        ($0.56)**       ($0.76)**
                                             ========================  ==============
</TABLE>

* Inclusion in amounts in calculation would be antidilutive; therefore not
included.

*Calculation results in antidiluted earnings per share, as such, presentation on
      statement of operations reverts back to basic.
#### § 1010.108 General information.

Insert and complete the format set forth in section XIII of the appendix to this part: Format for General Information.
42051.

#### BELL, Administratrix, et al. v. BELL.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Section 5 of the Act of 1959 (Ga. L. 1959, pp. 234, 235; *Code Ann.*§ 110-1205) relating to summary judgments provides in part: “Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated [t] herein.” In order to comply with this clear statutory requirement, an affidavit filed in support of a motion for summary judgment must contain evidentiary matter which would be admissible under the rules of evidence if the affiant were in court and testifying on the witness stand. *Planters Rural Tel. Co-op. v. Chance,*108 Ga. App. 146 (132 SE2d 90); *Thornton v. Alford,*112 Ga. App. 321, 323 (145 SE2d 106).

The defendant in this case, moving for summary judgment, relied for support of the motion solely upon his affidavit concerning transactions and communications with plaintiff’s decedent, as to which, under *Code*§ 38-1603 (1) and (5), he *508would not be permitted to testify upon trial of the case. Where there was in the affidavit no other matter sufficient to pierce the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition without the aid of the inadmissible facts, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant.

Argued June 9, 1966

Decided September 22, 1966

Rehearing denied October 25, 1966.

*Nicholson & Fleming, William M. Fleming, Jr., John Fleming,*for appellants.

*Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, Otis F. Askin,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
§ 8.1 Effective date for an insurance policy issued under section 1922(a) or 1922B of title 38 U.S.C. ( a ) *What is the effective date of the policy?* The effective date is the date policy coverage begins. Benefits due under a policy issued under section 1922(a) are payable any time after the effective date. Benefits due under a policy issued under section 1922B are payable any time two years after the effective date.
( b ) *How is the effective date established?* The effective date is the date you deliver both of the following to VA: ( 1 ) A valid application.
( 2 ) A premium payment. Note 1 to paragraph ( b
):
If your valid application and premium are mailed to VA, the postmark date will be the date of delivery.
Note 2 to paragraph ( b
):
If a postmark date is not available, the date of delivery will be the date your valid application and premium are received by VA.
Note 3 to paragraph ( b
):
If you apply for insurance coverage through an electronic medium, the date of delivery of the premium payment will be the date you authorize payment of the initial premium. In cases where the authorization does not result in the required premium payment because there were insufficient funds to cover the full initial premium, the delivery date of the premium payment will be the date your full initial premium is received by VA.
( c ) *Can you have a different effective date?* For insurance other than VALife, if you would like an effective date other than the date of delivery as described in paragraph (b) of this section, you may choose one of the following three options as an effective date: ( 1 ) The first day of the month in which you deliver your valid application and premium payment to VA. For example, if VA receives your application and premium payment on August 15, you may request an effective date of August 1.
( 2 ) The first day of the month following the month in which you deliver your valid application and premium payment. For example, if VA receives your application and premium payment on August 15, you may request an effective date of September 1.
( 3 ) The first day of any month up to six months prior to the month in which you deliver your valid application and premium payment. For example, if VA receives your application and premium payment on August 15, you may request an effective date of February 1 or the first day of any month following up to August 1. However, you must pay the following: ( i ) The insurance reserve amount for the time period for each month starting with the requested effective date up to the first day of the month prior to the month in which you delivered your application to VA; and
( ii ) The premium for the month in which you delivered your application to VA.
Note to paragraph ( c
):
For example, if your postmark date is August 15 and you request an effective date of February 1, you must pay the insurance reserve amount for February 1 through July 31, and also pay the August premium.
[67 FR 54738, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 87 FR 73653, Dec. 1, 2022]