alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 133A/1 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 133A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 571 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 133A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 571 May 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2014/C 133A/01 | Call for expressions of interest for external experts to be appointed as members and alternates of the Administrative Board of Review of the European Central Bank (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Central Bank

2014/C 133A/01

Call for expressions of interest for external experts to be appointed as members and alternates of the Administrative Board of Review of the European Central Bank (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 133A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 5 |

2014/C 133A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 10.31

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

     Amendment  Number One to that certain Term Note dated January 13, 2003 (the
"Note") by and  between  IEC  Electronics  Corp.,  a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Borrower) and SunTrust Bank (the "Bank"), a Georgia banking corporation.

                              W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Note as aforesaid; and

WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Note in certain respects;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

     Payments of  Principal  and  Interest.  Number 2 of the Term Note is hereby
amended by deleting Number 2 in its entirety and inserting the following  Number
2 in lieu thereof:

     2. Payments of Principal and Interest.

     Commencing  February  10,  2003  this  note  shall be  repaid  in eight (8)
consecutive  monthly  installments  of principal in the amount of $100,000  plus
accrued interest followed by a principal payment of $275,000.02 due on September
26, 2003, then followed by twenty seven (27) consecutive monthly installments of
principal  in the amount of  $41,666.66  plus accrued  interest  with all unpaid
principal  and  accrued  interest  due and  payable  on  January  10,  2006 (the
"Maturity Date"), unless sooner accelerated in accordance with the terms hereof.
Interest shall be calculated on the outstanding  principal balance of this Note,
and shall be due and  payable in  arrears;  provided  that,  in the event of any
change in the Prime Rate occurring on or after the date when the Holder mails an
invoice for the monthly  payment amount to the Borrower,  any such change in the
interest payment shall be reflected as an adjustment in the next monthly invoice
sent to the Maker and shall not be deemed to be due and payable until that date.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Amendment Number One this
26th day of September 2003.



Borrower:
IEC Electronics Corp.

By:
Name:  W. Barry Gilbert, Chairman
Title: CFO


SunTrust Bank


By:
Name:
Title:

                                   Page 1 of 1

                                  Page 73 of 79
#### §§ 1208.5-1208.19 [Reserved]
SCALE 1:24,000

GOSHEN QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Goshen Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1972.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Map units were modified from Hatch and Warren (1982).

Some postglacial units mapped using 2005 orthophoto

images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 9 of 24)

(WO

R

THIN

G

T

O

N)

(WILLIA

M

S

B

U

R

G)

(ASHFIELD)

(WESTHAMPTON) 72°45'0"W

72°45'0"W

72°52'30"W

72°52'30"W

42°30'0"N

42°30'0"N

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.
#### MITCHELL v. THE UNITED STATES

[58 C. Cls. 443; 267 U. S. 341]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

1. The act of October 6, 1917, c. 79, 40 Stat. 345, to increase facilities for testing ordnance materials, appropriated money to pay for buildings, land, etc., “ and damages and losses to persons * * * resulting from the procurement of the land,” and provided that if land and improvements could not be procured by purchase, the President was authorized to take them over, with all appurtenant rights, and the United States should make just compensation therefor, to be determined by the President; and that if the amount so determined were un*1021satisfactory to the person entitled, he should be paid 75 per cent of it and be entitled to sue the United States under Jud. Code, sections 24 and 145, to recover such further sum as added to the 75 per cent would make up just compensation. *Held,*that persons whose land was taken and who accepted the compensation fixed by the President were not thereby precluded from claiming additional compensation under the Fifth Amendment, as for a taking of their business, or from claiming damages under-the act itself for the loss of the business.

March 2, 1925.

2. It is a settled rule that damages resulting from a loss or destruction of business incidental to a taking of land are not recoverable as part of the compensation for the land taken.

3. By its reference to “losses * * * resulting from procurement of land,” the above act doubtless authorized the Secretary of War to consider losses resulting from destruction of business when procuring land by agreement, but it is not to be construed as a departure from the settled policy of Congress to limit compensation for a taking of land to interests in the land taken.

Mr. Justice BeaNdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
# FLIGHT PACKING CHECKLIST

1 / 1 | Page AIRCRAFT RELATED GCS RELATED

DESCRIPTION CHECK DESCRIPTION CHECK

Aircraft Flight Computer

Extra Propellers Payload Computer

Flight Batteries Extra SD Cards

Accessory Batteries Backup Harddrive

Charger Radios

Power Supply Antennas

Backup Parts Networking Router

Backup RC RX Serial, USB, Ethernet Chords

Telemetry Module Extension Chords

Antennas Power Strips

TOOLBOX RELATED Antenna Tracker

Connectors (Power & Signal) Joysticks

Appropriate Pins & Sockets Aircraft, Pilot, Maintenance Logs

Socket Set Fire Extinguisher

Hex Wrench Set Appropriate Payload

Screwdriver Set RC RX RELATED

Plier Set RC TX

Crimpers Neck Strap

Portable Soldering Equipment Antenna System

Hot Glue Gun Backup Battery

Velcro Charging Chord

Zip Ties & Straps Voltage Monitor
#### § 1080.3 Policy as to private controversies.

The Bureau shall act only in the public interest and will not initiate an investigation or take other enforcement action when the alleged violation is merely a matter of private controversy and does not tend to affect adversely the public interest.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 113]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 334]]

Public Law 112-113
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the station of the United States Border Patrol located at 
  2136 South Naco Highway in Bisbee, Arizona, as the ``Brian A. Terry 
     Border Patrol Station''. <<NOTE: May 15, 2012 -  [H.R. 2668]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Brian A. Terry 
Memorial Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brian A. Terry Memorial Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) A native of Flat Rock, Michigan, Agent Brian A. Terry 
        served his country proudly with the United States Marine Corps 
        and continued his service as a police officer with the cities of 
        Ecorse and Lincoln Park, Michigan, prior to joining the United 
        States Border Patrol.
            (2) Agent Terry was a member of the 699th Session of the 
        Border Patrol Academy assigned to the Naco Border Patrol Station 
        within the Tucson Sector.
            (3) On December 14, 2010, Border Patrol Agent Brian A. Terry 
        was conducting a Border Patrol Tactical unit (BORTAC) operation 
        in the area of ``Peck Wells''.
            (4) At 11:15 p.m., near Rio Rico, Arizona, and about 15 
        miles north of Nogales, Arizona, Agent Terry and his team 
        spotted a group of individuals approaching their position.
            (5) Shortly thereafter, an encounter ensued and gunfire was 
        exchanged that left Agent Terry mortally wounded.
            (6) Agent Terry succumbed to his injuries on December 15, 
        2010.
            (7) Agent Terry is survived by his mother, father, 
        stepmother, stepfather, brother, and two sisters.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

    The station of the United States Border Patrol located at 2136 South 
Naco Highway in Bisbee, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the 
``Brian A. Terry Border Patrol Station''.
SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the station referred to

[[Page 126 STAT. 335]]

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brian A. Terry 
Border Patrol Station''.

    Approved May 15, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2668:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-326 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Dec. 12, 14, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    May 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4806 Terms of the assistance to the veteran. ( a ) If a veteran chooses to accept VA's assistance (*i.e.,* a partial claim payment to the servicer, on the veteran's behalf), the veteran, and all co-borrowers on the guaranteed loan, must execute a note and security instrument in favor of the “Secretary of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States”. The name of the incumbent Secretary should not be included unless State law requires naming a real person.
( b ) Specific terms of the note and security instrument shall include the following: ( 1 ) The amount to be repaid to the Secretary, by the veteran, is the amount calculated under § 36.4805(e);
( 2 ) Repayment in full is required immediately upon— ( i ) The veteran's transfer of title to the property; or
( ii ) The refinancing or payment in full otherwise of the guaranteed loan with which the partial claim payment is associated.
( 3 ) A veteran may make payments for the subordinate loan, in whole or in part, without charge or penalty. If the veteran makes a partial prepayment, there will be no changes in the due date unless VA agrees in writing to those changes.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0889) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c), 3720, 3732)
[86 FR 28708, May 28, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 46983, Aug. 23, 2021]
#### § 1015.6 Assisting and facilitating.

It is a violation of this rule for a person to provide substantial assistance or support to any mortgage assistance relief service provider when that person knows or consciously avoids knowing that the provider is engaged in any act or practice that violates this rule.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.20 Recognition of a State home. ( a ) *How to apply for recognition.* To apply for recognition of a home for purposes of receiving per diem from VA, a State must submit a letter requesting recognition to the Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care in VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420. The letter must be signed by the State official authorized to make the request. The letter will be reviewed by VA, in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Survey and recommendation by Director.* ( 1 ) After receipt of a letter requesting recognition, VA will survey the home in accordance with § 51.31 to determine whether the facility and program of care meet the applicable requirements of subpart C and the applicable standards in subpart D, E, or F of this part. For purposes of the recognition process including the survey, references to State homes in the standards apply to homes that are being considered by VA for recognition as State homes.
( 2 ) If the Director of the VA Medical Center of jurisdiction determines that the applicable requirements and standards are met, the Director will submit a written recommendation for recognition to the Under Secretary for Health.
( 3 ) If the Director does not recommend recognition, the Director will submit a written recommendation against recognition to the Under Secretary for Health and will notify in writing the State official who signed the letter submitted under paragraph (a) of this section and the State official authorized to oversee operations of the home. The notification will state the following: ( i ) The specific standard(s) not met; and
( ii ) The State's right to submit a response to the Under Secretary for Health, including any additional evidence, no later than 30 calendar days after the date of the notification to the State.
( c ) *Decision by the Under Secretary for Health.* After receipt of a recommendation from the Director, and allowing 30 calendar days for the state to respond to a negative recommendation and to submit evidence, the Under Secretary for Health will award or deny recognition based on all available evidence. The applicant will be notified of the decision in writing. Adverse decisions may be appealed to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (see 38 CFR part 20).
( d ) *Effect of recognition.* ( 1 ) Recognition of a State home means that, at the time of recognition, the facility and its program of care meet the applicable requirements of this part. The State home must obtain certification after recognition in accordance with § 51.30.
( 2 ) After a State home is recognized, any new annex, new branch, or other expansion in the size or capacity of a home or any relocation of the home to a new facility must be separately recognized.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0161)
#### § 42.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the Secretary a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to the claim or statement, the Secretary shall stay the process immediately. The Secretary may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
Since the Gove rnment has a lrea dy located these videotapes, it admits that obtaining 1 them will not cause a

ny unfair disruption or burden on its day -to-day activities. The Gove rnment’s

(continued...) UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA M OHA M M ED AL AD AH I, : : P etitioner , :

: v. : Ci vi l A cti on No. 05 -28 0 (GK) : BARACK

OBAMA, et al., : : Re spo nde nt s. :

AM EN DE D O RD ER Petitioner Al Adahi has moved t o compel R espondent to produce videotapes of three forc ed extractions of Petitioner from his c ell at Guanta namo B ay . Since the filing of this Motion on J une 8, 2009, the Gover

nment has informe d Petitioner of the existence of vide otapes of thr ee a dditional

e xtra c tio ns . Re sp on de nts se e k to us e a numbe r o f s tate me nts ma de by Pe tit ion e r a g a ins t hi m at hi s habea s corpus he aringto be held on Monday , J une 22, 2009. No counsel, either f or the Petitioner or the Gove rnment, has se en the videota pes. Consequently , it is impossible f or any counsel to make repr esentations as to whether the y are or are not e x culpatory

. Petitioner argues that there are rea sons to believe that the a ctions of t he F orce d Cell Ex trac tion Teams (“ FCE Te ams”) ha ve in the past be en abusive, violent, and inhumane . See Exh. A to P etitioner’s Moti on. In this case, one of the for ced extract i o n s occur

red a pproxi mately

15 day s befor e Petitioner Al Ada hi ga ve a ve ry inculpatory statement to Gover

nment interrog ators. Consequently , the videotape s may be ex culpatory , in which

case they would fall squar ely

within paragraph I .D.1 of the Case Manag ement Or der. The ref ore, the videotapes must be pr oduced so that this determination can be made. 1(...continued) 1 c on c e rn that an o rd e r t o c omp e l pr od uc tio n of the vid e ota

pe s in thi s c a se mig ht “ op e n th e do or ” to other detainees to reque st such evidence, is unpersua sive. Eac h merits judge will make his or her own deter mination on the basis of the spec ific fa cts prese nted if such a motion is made. Sin c e thi s is a

six- da y be nc h tri a l, the ta

pe s may be pla

y e d at a late r p oint in

the tr ia l, 2 a f t e r t h e c o n c l u s i o no f

P e t i t i o n e r ’ s c a s e , i f

th e y ar e d e e m e d

e x c u l p a t o r

y. -2- WHEREFORE , it is t his 18th day of June, 2009, hereby OR DE RE D , th a t Pe tit ion e r’ s Moti on to Comp e l Prod uc tio n of I RF Vi de ota

pe s is granted , and the vid e ota

pe s d isc us se d must be pr od uc e d by F ri da

y , J un e 19 , 200 9, un le ss co un se l ar e a ble to ag ree to a diffe rent sche dule. 2

/ s / Glady s Kessler Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ct J u d ge Copies via ECF t o all couns el of recor d
§ 17.132 Appeals. ( a ) This section applies only to legacy claims.
( b ) When any claim for payment or reimbursement of expenses of medical care or services rendered in non-Department of Veterans Affairs facilities or from non-Department of Veterans Affairs resources has been disallowed, the claimant shall be notified of the reasons for the disallowance and of the right to initiate an appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals by filing a Notice of Disagreement, and shall be furnished such other notices or statements as are required by part 19 of this chapter, governing appeals.
[33 FR 19012, Dec. 20, 1968. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 43748, July 22, 2022]
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beeper Plus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Frank DeRenzo,
President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

/s/Frank DeRenzo
-------------------
Frank DeRenzo
President/Director
September 11, 2003
#### § 11.80 Sale or discount of note by holding bank.

Any bank holding a note secured by an Adjusted Service Certificate may sell the note to any bank authorized to make a loan to a veteran and deliver the certificate to such bank. In case a note secured by an Adjusted Service Certificate is sold or transferred, the bank selling, discounting or rediscounting the note is required by law to notify the veteran promptly by mail at his last known post office address. No Adjusted Service Certificate is negotiable or assignable, or may serve as security for a loan, except as provided in section 502 of the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, as amended. Any negotiation, assignment or loan made in violation of section 502 of the World War Adjusted Compensation Act is void. In case of sale, discount or rediscount by the bank which made the loan, the note or notes should be accompanied by the affidavit required by § 11.85.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997, and 62 FR 45733, Sept. 9, 1997.

#### § 9.13 Actions on the policy.

The Assistant Director for Insurance will furnish the name and address of the insuring company upon written request of a member of the uniformed services or his or her beneficiary. Actions at law or in equity to recover on the policy, in which there is not alleged any breach of any obligation undertaken by the United States, should be brought against the insurer.

[40 FR 4135, Jan. 28, 1975. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 20135, 20136, May 6, 1996]
Order entered August 17 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 001 29

- CR No. 05

- 21

- 00130

- CR

VICTORIA IFEANYI ANWUZIA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On A ppeal from the Coun ty Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . CR16

- 088 6 & CR16

- 0887

O RDER
Before the Court is appellant ’s August 16 , 2021 third motion for an

extension o f time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and O R DER
appellant ’ s brief due by August 31 , 2021

.
/ s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4195 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-565 

Vol. 1 of 2

Certain Ink Cartridges and 

Components Thereof
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4195 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-565 

Vol. 1 of 2

Certain Ink Cartridges and 

Components Thereof