alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 122A/16 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 122A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5816 April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 122A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5816 April 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions — Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) specialising in legal research — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Lawyers with Bulgarian legal training (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Lawyers with German legal training (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Lawyers with Croatian legal training (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Lawyers with Irish legal training (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Lawyers with Lithuanian legal training (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Lawyers with Slovak legal training (SK) — ( OJ C 68 A, 26.2.2015 ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2015/C 122A/01

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions — Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) specialising in legal research — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Lawyers with Bulgarian legal training (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Lawyers with German legal training (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Lawyers with Croatian legal training (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Lawyers with Irish legal training (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Lawyers with Lithuanian legal training (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Lawyers with Slovak legal training (SK) — ( OJ C 68 A, 26.2.2015 )

( OJ C 68 A, 26.2.2015 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 16.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 122/1

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions — Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) specialising in legal research — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Lawyers with Bulgarian legal training (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Lawyers with German legal training (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Lawyers with Croatian legal training (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Lawyers with Irish legal training (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Lawyers with Lithuanian legal training (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Lawyers with Slovak legal training (SK)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 68 A of 26 February 2015
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

On page 2, Section I, point 3:

for:

‘Deadline (including validation): 31 March 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’,

read:

‘Deadline (including validation): 9 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’.

---
§ 1030.1 Authority, purpose, coverage, and effect on state laws. ( a ) *Authority.* This part, known as Regulation DD, is issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to implement the Truth in Savings Act of 1991 (the act), contained in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 3201 *et seq.,* Public Law 102-242, 105 Stat. 2236), as amended by title X, section 1100B of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376). Information-collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and have been assigned OMB No. 3170-0004.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to enable consumers to make informed decisions about accounts at depository institutions. This part requires depository institutions to provide disclosures so that consumers can make meaningful comparisons among depository institutions.
( c ) *Coverage.* This part applies to depository institutions except for credit unions. In addition, the advertising rules in § 1030.8 of this part apply to any person who advertises an account offered by a depository institution, including deposit brokers.
( d ) *Effect on state laws.* State law requirements that are inconsistent with the requirements of the act and this part are preempted to the extent of the inconsistency. Additional information on inconsistent state laws and the procedures for requesting a preemption determination from the Bureau are set forth in appendix C of this part.
( e ) *Relationship to Regulation CC.* The Director of the Bureau and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System jointly issue regulations under sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004, 4008(a)) that are codified within Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229).
[76 FR 79278, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 84 FR 31698, July 3, 2019]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133330 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133330 COA: 274690 Washtenaw CC: 05-001226-FH ROBERT CHARLES PARHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 10.8.5

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment to the License Agreement, effective as of this 16th day of March, 2015 (the “Amendment Date”) by and between NephroGenex, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at 2300 Englert Drive, Durham, NC, 27713 (“LICENSEE”) and Vanderbilt University by and through its Center for Technology Transfer and Commercialization, having a principal place of business at 1207 17th Avenue South, Suite 105, Nashville, TN 37212 (hereinafter referred to as “VANDERBILT”),

 

WHEREAS LICENSEE and VANDERBILT have entered into a RESTATED and AMENDED LICENSE AGREEMENT effective as of July 1, 2012 (the “License Agreement”), as amended on November 6, 2013 (the “First Amendment to the License Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS LICENSEE and VANDERBILT have a desire to amend Appendix A of the License Agreement to clarify the Licensed Patents subject to the License Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promise and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, LICENSEE and VANDERBILT hereto replace Appendix A in the License Agreement with amended Appendix A attached hereto.

 

Except as otherwise provided in this Second Amendment to the License Agreement, all other provisions, terms, and conditions of the License agreement, as amended by the First Amendment to the License Agreement, shall remain unchanged

 

[[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LICENSEE and VANDERBILT have executed this Second Amendment to the License Agreement as of the date set forth in the first paragraph above.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
NephroGenex, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
4/27/15
    	
 
    	
/s/   J. Wesley Fox
    
	
Dated
    	
 
    	
J.   Wesley Fox, Ph.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President,   Chief Scientific Officer and Director
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Vanderbilt   University
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
4/23/15
    	
 
    	
/s/   A. Bentley
    
	
Dated
    	
 
    	
Name A. Bentley
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title   Asst. VC — Tech Transfer
    


 











 

Appendix A

 

LICENSED TECHNOLOGY

 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No 14/302968 Publication No:20140296303

USE OF PYRIDOXAMINE TO TREAT AND/OR PREVENT DISEASE PROCESSES

 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 62/078299 filed November 11, 2014

METHODS FOR LIMITING ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 62/130435 filed March 9, 2015

METHODS FOR LIMITING ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees of Hangar 481, at Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Hangar 481 at Kirtland Air Force Base.                    

*Location:*                         Albuquerque, New Mexico.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees who worked at Hangar 481, at Kirtland Air Force Base.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         March 1, 1989 through June 30, 1996.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. E9-23685 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2433 

To prohibit the designation of any agency, bureau, or other entity of the 

Department of Homeland Security as a separate agency or bureau for 

purposes of post employment restrictions in title 18, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the designation of any agency, bureau, or other 

entity of the Department of Homeland Security as a 

separate agency or bureau for purposes of post employment restrictions in title 18, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTEGRITY IN POST-EMPLOYMENT. 

4 (a) DESIGNATIONS AS SEPARATE AGENCIES AND BU5 REAUS BARRED.—No agency, bureau, or other entity of 

6 the Department of Homeland Security may be designated 

7 under section 207(h)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

8 as a separate agency or bureau. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2433 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—This section takes effect on 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

4 (2) APPLICABILITY TO DESIGNATIONS.—The 

5 following shall cease to be effective on the date of 

6 the enactment of this Act: 

7 (A) Any waiver of restrictions made under 

8 section 207(c)(2)(C) of title 18, United States 

9 Code, before the enactment of this Act, with re10 spect to any position, or category of positions, 

11 in the Department of Homeland Security. 

12 (B) Any designation of an agency, bureau, 

13 or other entity in the Department of Homeland 

14 Security, before the enactment of this Act, 

15 under section 207(h)(1) of title 18, United 

16 States Code, as a separate agency or bureau. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### FRANK BORNN, TRADING AS THE BORNN DISTILLING CO., v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 425; 271 U. S. 684]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court June 7, 1926.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 91096          Scale: 80,000          Edition: 1          Edition Date: 01-AUG-51          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1954/51**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
# Official Journal C 384/13 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 384 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 384

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 384/01 | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Consolidated annual accounts of the European Union 2019 | 1 |
| 2020/C 384/02 | The ECA's statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council – independent auditor’s report | 180 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 384/01

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Consolidated annual accounts of the European Union 2019

1

2020/C 384/02

The ECA's statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council – independent auditor’s report

180

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1012.237 Hearings—notice of proceedings pursuant to withdrawal of state certification. ( a ) A State, upon receipt of a notice of proceedings issued pursuant to § 1010.505 of this chapter, may obtain a hearing by filing a written request in accordance with the instructions regarding such request contained in the notice of proceedings. Such request must be filed within 15 days of receipt of the notice of proceedings and must be accompanied by an answer conforming to the requirements of § 1081.201(b) and (c).
( b ) When a hearing is requested pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, such hearing shall be held within 45 days of receipt of this request. The time and place for the hearing shall be fixed with due regard for the public interest and the convenience and necessity of the parties or their representatives.
( c ) Failure to answer within the time allowed by paragraph (a) of this section or failure to appear at a hearing duly scheduled shall result in an appropriate order under § 1010.505 of this chapter withdrawing the State's certification. Such order shall be effective as of the date of service or receipt.
Exhibit 10.2

 

MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD

2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT NO. 2

 

This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated May 23, 2007 and amended August 1, 2010 (the “2007 Plan”), sponsored by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Bermuda (the “Company”), shall become effective as of this 30th day of March 2015.

 

SECTION 1.  Definitions.  Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.

 

SECTION 2.  Amendment.  Section 9(j) of the 2007 Plan is replaced in its entirety with the following:

 

“Constructive Termination” shall mean a termination of a Participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary at the initiative of the Participant that the Participant declares by prior written notice delivered to the Secretary of the Company to be a Constructive Termination by the Company or subsidiary and which follows (i) a material decrease in a Participant’s annual rate of base salary or total direct target compensation opportunity (base salary plus target annual incentive compensation plus target long-term incentive compensation), (ii) a material diminution in the authority, duties or responsibilities of his or her position with the result that the Participant makes a determination in good faith that he or she cannot continue to carry out his or her job in substantially the same manner as it was intended to be carried out immediately before such diminution or (iii) a relocation of such Participant’s principal place of employment by more than fifty miles from the location at which such Participant is then principally employed (or in the case of a Participant located in Bermuda, a relocation of such Participant’s place of employment from Bermuda), in each case, without the consent of the Participant. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Constructive Termination shall not occur within the meaning of this paragraph unless, within 120 days of the event constituting Constructive Termination, the Participant has given to the Company or subsidiary, as the case may be, a notice of intent to terminate employment due to a Constructive Termination and the Company or subsidiary, as the case may be, has been given an opportunity (and has failed) over a 30 day period to cure the circumstances constituting Constructive Termination.

 

SECTION 3.  Effect of this Amendment.  Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, this Amendment shall have no effect on any of the Company’s rights or obligations under the Plan or any Award granted thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed, effective as of March 30, 2015.

 

	
 
    	
MONTPELIER   RE HOLDINGS LTD.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Christopher L. Harris
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:    President and CEO
Exhibit 31.6


Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Barings Private Credit Corporation


pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,


as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Jonathan Landsberg, as Chief Financial Officer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barings Private Credit Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


/s/ JONATHAN LANDSBERGJonathan LandsbergChief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2022
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCO MARTINEZ

- SEREN, AKA Marco

Martinez Seren,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 72927

Agency No. A200

- 115

- 388

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 19, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Marco Martinez

- Seren , a native and citizen of Honduras , petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) order denying h is motion to

reopen and remand removal proceedings

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252

. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen and remand for ab use

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 72927

of discretion. Movsisian v. Ashcroft , 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005)

. We

deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez

- Seren’s motion to

reopen and remand to apply for cancellation of removal where he fai led to

establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought

. See Garcia v. Holder , 621

F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir. 2010) (providing that a motion to reopen will not be

granted absent a showing of prima facie eligibility for relief based on

demonstrating “ a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief

have been satisfied ” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) )

.

We reject as unsupported by the record Martinez

- Seren’s contentions that

the BIA ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of his motion.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.