alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.24 Filing requirements. ( a ) *Filing.* All papers filed with the ASC in any proceeding shall be filed with the Secretary, Appraisal Subcommittee, 1325 G Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005.
( b ) *Manner of filing.* Unless otherwise specified by the ASC, filing may be accomplished by: ( 1 ) Personal service;
( 2 ) Delivering the papers to a reliable commercial courier service, overnight delivery service, or to the U.S. Post Office for Express Mail delivery; and
( 3 ) Mailing the papers by first class, registered, or certified mail.
[57 FR 31650, July 17, 1992, as amended at 69 FR 2501, Jan. 16, 2004]
Enertopia Corp.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






THIS JV EXTENSION AGREEMENT is made as of the
__29__ day of April, 2015. 

AMONG 

ENERTOPIA CORPORATION, a
corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada with its
executive office at 950-1130 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia


("Enertopia") 

AND: 

THE GREEN CANVAS
LTD., a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of
Saskatchewan with its registered and records office at 2923 Dewdney Avenue,
Regina, Saskatchewan S4T 0Y1. 

("GCL" and together with Enertopia, the
"Parties") 

AND: 

TIM SELENSKI, an
individual with an address at 2923 Dewdney Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4T 0Y1


("Selenski") 

WHEREAS: 

A. The Parties and Selenski have previously entered into an
certain Acquisition and Joint Venture Agreement dated February 28, 2014 and due
to expire on February 28, 2015 (the "Agreement"); and 

B. Due to unforeseeable delays caused by significant arm’s
length changes in the industry sector the parties now wish to make certain
amendments to the provisions of the Agreement. 

C. The Parties and Selenski have conducted good faith
negotiations meant to revise and modify the Agreement to make it better reflect
the changed market conditions and are actively continuing these negotiations.


NOW THEREFORE THIS JOINT VENTURE EXTENSION AGREEMENT
WITNESSETH that in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is also
hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties hereto hereby
agree as follows: 




2 

	1. 	
      Both parties agree to continue in good faith to extend or
      amend the Existing Joint Venture based on the conditions noted
    above.

	 	 
	2. 	
      The deadline for completing the Joint Venture extension
      or amendment is June 30, 2015 or on a month to month basis with both
      parties approving such monthly extensions after June 30,
  2015:



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amending Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 

ENERTOPIA CORPORATION 
by its authorized signatory


Per: 

______________________________
Authorized Signatory 

THE GREEN CANVAS LTD. 
by its authorized
signatory 

Per: 

______________________________
Authorized Signatory 

	____________________________________________
(Witness)
    	______________________________________________
TIM
      SELENSKI
42057.

#### ODOM v. BEARD.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

“Residence” and “domicile” are not synonymous and convertible terms. *Worsham v. Ligon,*144 Ga. 707, 711 (87 SE 1025); *Avery v. Bower,*170 Ga. 202, 204 (152 SE 239); *Commercial Bank v. Pharr,*75 Ga. App. 364, 376 (43 SE2d 439). This being so, it seems inconsistent to hold, as held in *Daniel v. Sullivan,*46 Ga. 277 (1872), that one’s legal residence for the purpose of being sued in this state is necessarily the same county as his domicile where domicile is determined by that part of *Code*§ 79-401 which provides, “The domicile of every person of full age, and laboring under no disability, is the place where the family of *365such person shall permanently reside, if in this state.” However, we are compelled to follow the *Daniel*case here, as there is no substantial basis in fact to distinguish that case from this one. Where the defendant in this case actually resided part of the time in Chatham County and part of the time in Toombs County and his family permanently resided in Toombs County at the time this action for personal injuries was brought against him in Chatham County, his legal residence for the purpose of this case was in Toombs County. The trial court erred in finding against the defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction of the Chatham Superior Court.

Argued June 9, 1966

Decided September 15, 1966

Rehearing denied September 29, 1966

*CoHsh, Smith & Bernier, Julian F. Corish,*for appellant.

*Donald E. Austin,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****IRS international tax forum.**
 
1996:Summer | Fall
1997:Winter
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.44/2:1392/
Item Number:0964-B | 0964-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:000332475
 
January 24, 2020
FY2015_Q2_10Q_EX10.5






Exhibit 10.5
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
DISNEY SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010
    
WHEREAS, The Walt Disney Company (the “Company”) maintains the Disney Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, Article 12 of the Plan authorizes the Committee under the Plan to make certain Plan amendments; and


WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to change the compensation limit for matching contributions;


NOW, THEREFORE, this Fourth Amendment to the Plan is hereby adopted, effective January 1, 2015:


		
	1.
	Section 3.02(a) (“Matching Contributions”) of the Plan, shall be amended in its entirety to read:




(a) Each Employer will contribute, with respect to Participants (other than ESPN Regular Remote Employees) employed by it who have met the eligibility requirements set forth in Section 3.02(b), a Matching Contribution equal to 50% of so much of the aggregate Tax-Deferred Contributions and Roth Contributions made on behalf of the Participant for the Plan Year as do not exceed 4% (6% to the extent the Participant is a Covered Employee described in Section 1.19(a)(ii) or (iii)) of the Participant’s Compensation for the Plan Year, determined without regard to the Maximum Compensation Limitation, disregarding, for the Plan Year in which the Participant first satisfies the eligibility requirements, contributions made and Compensation earned before the Participant satisfies the eligibility requirements or enrolls in the Plan, if later; provided, however, that Matching Contributions made on behalf of a Participant for any Plan Year shall not exceed 2% (3% to the extent the Participant is a Covered Employee described in Section 1.19(a)(ii) or (iii)) of the Participant’s Compensation Maximum Compensation Limitation for the Plan Year, limited by the Maximum Compensation Limitation. 
    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Fourth Amendment to be executed this 30th day of April, 2015.




	
			
	By:
	 
	/s/ JEFFERY E. SHAPIRO

	 
	 
	Jeffrey E. Shapiro
Vice President, Enterprise Benefits
Authorized Representative and Committee Member
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Mine Safety and Health Administration

# ACTION:

Correction notice.

# SUMMARY:

On September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48601), the Mine Safety and Inspection Service published a notice document soliciting comments concerning the extension of information collection related to Gamma Radiation Exposure Records. This document corrects a typographical error that appeared in that document.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        John Rowlett,                         *Rowlett.John@dol.gov*, (202) 693-9827.                    

## Correction

On page 48602, in the first column, in the “Background” section, in the second paragraph, the word “lunch”, should have read “lung”.

Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 25th day of September, 2009.

John Rowlett,

Director, Management Services Division.

[FR Doc. E9-23548 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-43-P
```

[House Document 107-171]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 2nd Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-171 

 
            FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

          THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

                              TRANSMITTING

 CBO'S FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002, PURSUANT TO 2 
                           U.S.C. SEC. 904(b)

January 23, 2002.--Referred to the Committee on the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed
                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
STAR 99-011                WASHINGTON : 2002

                                     U.S. Congress,
                               Congressional Budget Office,
                                  Washington, DC, January 15, 2002.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to section 254(b) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 
U.S.C. 904(b)), the Congressional Budget Office hereby submits 
its Final Sequestration Report for Fiscal Year 2002 to the U.S. 
House of Representatives.
            Sincerely,
                                         Barry B. Anderson,
                                                   Deputy Director.
    Enclosure.
    

```
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
 FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of FCCC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Company.




Date: February 7, 2012
By:Bernard ZimmermanPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
§ 1209.23 Commencement of proceeding and contents of notice of charges. Proceedings under subpart C of this part are commenced by the Director by the issuance of a notice of charges, as defined in § 1209.3(p), that must be served upon a respondent. A notice of charges shall state all of the following: ( a ) The legal authority for the proceeding and for FHFA's jurisdiction over the proceeding;
( b ) A statement of the matters of fact or law showing that FHFA is entitled to relief;
( c ) A proposed order or prayer for an order granting the requested relief;
( d ) Information concerning the nature of the proceeding and pertinent procedural matters, including: the requirement that the hearing shall be held in the District of Columbia; the presiding officer will set the date and location for an evidentiary hearing in a scheduling order to be issued not less than 30 days or more than 60 days after service of the notice of charges; contact information for FHFA enforcement counsel and the presiding officer, if known; submission information for filings and appearances, the time within which to request a hearing, and citation to FHFA Rules of Practice and Procedure; and
( e ) Information concerning proper filing of the answer, including the time within which to file the answer as required by law or regulation, a statement that the answer shall be filed with the presiding officer or with FHFA as specified therein, and the address for filing the answer (and request for a hearing, if applicable).
EX-10.60



 Exhibit 10.60 
  

			
	



		  
 111 Eighth Avenue

7th Floor

New York, NY 10011
 212.624.3700


 As of March 25, 2015 

Steven Zatz, M.D. 
 c/o WebMD Health Corp. 

111 Eighth Avenue 
 New York, NY 10011-5201 

Dear Steve: 
 Reference is made to the grant of
(i) a nonqualified option to purchase 80,000 shares of WebMD Health Corp.’s (the “Company”) Common Stock made to you on March 25, 2015 (the “2015 Option”) as evidenced by the Option Agreement dated March 25,
2015 (the “Option Agreement”) and (ii) 40,000 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock made to you on the same date (the “2015 Restricted Stock Grant” and collectively with the 2015 Option, the “2015
Grants”) and evidenced by a Restricted Stock Agreement dated March 25, 2015 (the “Restricted Stock Agreement”). 
  

	 	1.	Impact of Certain Terminations following a Change of Control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Option Agreement or the Restricted Stock Agreement, in the event of the termination
of your employment by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in your Employment Agreement with the Company dated July 14, 2005, as amended, (the “Employment Agreement”)), in either case
following a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan): 

  

	 	(a)	the 2015 Option, to the extent unvested, shall be deemed vested on the date of termination and shall remain outstanding as if you remained in the employ of the Company through the expiration of the originally scheduled
term of the 2015 Option; and 

  

	 	(b)	the 2015 Restricted Stock Grant, to the extent unvested, shall be deemed vested on the date of termination. 


The acceleration of vesting of the 2015 Grants and the continued exercisability of the 2015 Option are expressly conditioned on (i) a
release of claims (as described in the Employment Agreement) being executed by you and becoming effective and (ii) your continued compliance with the restrictive covenant agreements you have signed in connection with your employment. 








	 	2.	Effect on Agreements. Except as set forth herein, the Option Agreement and the Restricted Stock Agreement remain in full force and effect. 


 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	WEBMD HEALTH CORP
		
	By:		 /s/ Lewis H. Leicher

			Lewis H. Leicher
			Senior Vice President
	
	Agreed to:
	
	 /s/ Steven Zatz

	Steven Zatz, M.D.


  
 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23462]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 14, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Robert D. Fleming and Phyllis A. Fleming, both of Ipava, 
Illinois, as a group acting in concert, and Joseph J. Dietz, Lewistown, 
Illinois; to retain voting shares of ISB Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Ipava State Bank, both of Ipava, 
Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 24, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-23462 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000654 06-JAN-2016 09:50 AM
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0173 SAT Date: 12/31/2013 Print Date: 1/31/2014
Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases : Analogs:

. Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: FATE: S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion based on and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on t properties of the PMN material.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.26 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.050 green algal 96-h EC50 0.018 fish

_ chronic value 0.004 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.006 algal

_ chronic value 0.008 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; MW log Kow 5.67 (EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S = 3.1 mg/L or dispersible (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 25, 2009, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II (“HEDGE II”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Diamond Electric Corporation, Dundee, MI, has been added as a party to the venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HEDGE II intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 19, 2009, HEDGE II filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 2, 2009 (74 FR 15003).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 17, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38473).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-23402 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M