alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.62



 EXHIBIT 10.62 
  

 
 



 
 March 7, 2014 
 Mike
Ezzell 
 3980 E. Navigator Lane 
 Phoenix, AZ 85050 

Dear Mike: 
 On behalf of the Executive Leadership of American
Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to present you with this formal letter amending and rearticulating your current employment arrangement. This letter is intended to address basic employment terms related to your
continuing position with the Company. 
 Effective March 1, 2014, your title will change to Executive Vice President of Private Capital Markets. 

Your semi-monthly salary, paid on the 15th and last business day of each month, will be $14,583.33 (which equates to $350,000 on an annual basis).
Additionally, you will be eligible for discretionary bonus compensation comprised of (a) an annual bonus of up to 100% of your Base Salary and (b) an annual restricted stock grant of up to 100% of Base Salary, vesting over five years from
the date of such grant (collectively, the “Annual Bonus”). The Annual Bonus is at the discretion of the senior management of the Company, based on yours and the Company’s performance during the year and will be paid out during the
first quarter of the following year. 
 The Company is an at-will employer. This means that your employment and compensation may be terminated by you or the
Company at any time, for any reason or no reason. Further, this letter and any discussions that you may have had with employees at the Company do not constitute a contract of employment or an assurance of continued indefinite employment. This letter
shall be governed under the laws of the State of Arizona. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/S/ Don Primosch
	
	Don Primosch
	Director, Human Resources


 I accept the offer of continued employment upon the terms set forth in this letter as of the date set forth below. I
understand that this offer does not constitute a contract of employment or an assurance of continued indefinite employment. 
  

			
	Signature: 		 /s/ Michael Ezzell



			
	Printed Name: 		 Michael Ezzell



			
	Date: 		 3/7/14
# ~p ^ Q U.S . Departmen t „„„ , ^ n f Trancnnrtntin n ^^^ Independenc

e Ave. , S.W . o i I ransponaiio n O^.^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^^^.^ ^ Counse l Washington . D.C . 2059 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 

### SE P0 2 2009 Scott P . Lewis , Esq . B y Fa x an dRegular Mai l Christin e M . Griffin , Esq . Anderso n & Kreige r

LL P On e Cana l Park , Suit e 20 0 Cambridge , M A 0214 1 RE : Skvdiv e Sacrament o v . City o f Lincoln . FA A Docke t

No . 16-09-0 9 Dea r Mr . Lewis : W e hav e receive dyou r

Augus t 25 , 200 9 reques t

for a nextensio no f

tim e unti l Septembe r

21 , 2009 , inwhic ht o fil e an answe r o n behal f

o f th e Respondent , City o f

Lincoln , California , in th e above-captione dproceeding . Th e answe r wa s du e o nAugus t

31 , 2009 . Yo u stat e that you neede dth e additiona l tim e t o prepar e a nappropriat e respons e t o th e complaint . Yo u note dtha t th e City sought

t o obtai n th e consen t

o f Skydiv e Sacrament o t o th e propose dextensio no f time , however , complainan t

decline dt o consen t

absen t unacceptabl e concession s b y th e City . Give n th e fact

that th e City' s answe r

was du e o nMonday , Augus t 31 , yo u contacte dthi s offic e b y telephon e o n Frida y afternoon , Augus t 28 , t o determin e whethe r you r motio nha dbee n granted . I advise dyo u tha t th e City' s motio nha dbee ngranted . Late r tha t afternoon , I receive dth e complainant' s Augus t 2 7 Respons e t o Respondent' s Motio nt o Exten dTime . I n that document , th e complainan t request s that

th e motio nb e denied , o r i nth e alternative , b e grante dbut

onl y for aon e o r tw o day extension . A s I advise dyo u o n Augus t 28 , you r reques t o nbehal f

o f th e City for

th e extensio nha s bee n granted . Th e Responden t City o f Lincoln' s answe r

i s no w du e o no r

befor e Septembe r

21 , 2009 . However , give n th e complainant' s oppositio nandmotion , w e reques t that yo u file th e City' s answe r

a s soo n a s practicable . Sincerely ,

Jonathan W . Cros s , \;s ^ Manager , Airport s La w Branc hr- ^ Airport s an dEnvironmenta l g Law Divisio n : j -'

- cc : Richar dJ . Durden , Esq .CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y that o nSeptembe r

r^ . 2009, 1 cause dt o b e place dinth e Unite dState s mai l (firs t

clas s mail , postag e paid ) o r personall y delivered , atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

addresse dto : Complainant' s Counse l Richar dJ . Durden , Esq . 2798 7 Richmon dHil l Roa d Conifer , Colorad o 8043 3 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n FAA Par t 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t

(AGC-610 ) Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Airport Complianc e Divisio n (Interna l Mail )

Sharic e Jefferso n Airport s & Environmenta l La w Divisio n Offic e o f th e Chie f

Counse l Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2601 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2601

To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees 
   to administer and enforce the provisions relating to the ``Do-not-
            call'' registry of the Telemarketing Sales Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

Mr. Stearns (for himself, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Pitts, 
  Mr. Rush, Mr. Pickering, and Mr. Burgess) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees 
   to administer and enforce the provisions relating to the ``Do-not-
            call'' registry of the Telemarketing Sales Rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FEE COLLECTION AUTHORITY.

    Section 2 of the ``Do-not-call'' Implementation Act (15 U.S.C. 6101 
note) is amended by striking ``through 2007'' and inserting ``through 
2012''.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, Senior United S tates District Judge for the 1 District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

__________ No. 98-2689

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * vs. * Appeal from the United * States District Court Ronald W. Schmitz, * for the Northern District * of Iowa. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] *

__________ Submitted: December 15, 1998 Filed: January 6, 1999

__________ Before BEAM and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge. 1

_________ PER CURIAM.The H onorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court 2 for the Northern District of Iowa. 2 Ronald W. Schmitz appeals his jury conviction and resulting sentence of sixty months for conspiracy to commit money laundering, various evidentiary rulings an d the di strict court’s denial of various post-trial motions. Schmitz raises severa l 2 arguments related to the adm ission of evidence offered by the government, the district court’s limiting of his examination of his coconspirator regarding plea and forfeitur e deals, and in the sufficiency of the evidence in general. Schmitz also raises arguments concerning pre-trial disco very in the case and claims that the district court’s refusal to give a jury instruction regarding the definition of money laundering was in error
. Finally, Schmitz claim s that the sentencing process constitutes an unconstitutional bill of attainder. Having reviewed the

parties’ briefs and submissions, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Because Schmitz’s appeal involves the straightforward application of settl ed principles of law, we conclude that a discussion of the issues by the panel will serve no useful purpose. We have carefully reviewed Schmitz’ s arguments and find the m to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8 Cir. R. th 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 1010.9 Twenty acre lots. ( a ) The sale of lots in a subdivision is exempt from the registration requirements of the Act if, since April 28, 1969, each lot in the subdivision has contained at least twenty acres. In determining eligibility for the exemption, easements for ingress and egress or public utilities are considered part of the total acreage of the lot if the purchaser retains ownership of the property affected by the easement.
( b ) The sale must also comply with the anti-fraud provisions of § 1010.4(b) and (c) of this part.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8964-5]


Proposed Administrative Cost Recovery Agreement Pursuant to 
Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) for the Merrill Meyers Site, 
Wells County, IN

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice and request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 
9622(i), notification is hereby given of a proposed administrative 
settlement agreement regarding partial recovery of costs incurred by 
EPA in implementing a removal action at the Merrill Meyers [sic] Site, 
Petroleum, in Wells County, Indiana. EPA proposes to enter into this 
agreement under the authority of Sections 107 and 122(h) of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. 9607 and 9622(h). The proposed agreement has been executed by 
Merrill A. and Janice A. Myers, residing in Petroleum, Indiana. Under 
the proposed agreement, the Myers will pay $174,706.67 to reimburse the 
Superfund for part of the $228,831.93 in costs incurred by EPA in 
implementing the removal action. For thirty days following the date of 
publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating 
to the proposed agreement. EPA will consider all comments received and 
may decide not to enter into the proposed agreement if comments 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the agreement is 
inappropriate, improper or inadequate.

DATES: Comments on the proposed agreement must be received by EPA on or 
before November 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to the Docket Clerk, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and should refer to: In the Matter of 
Merrill Meyers Site, EPA Docket No. V-W-`09-C-936.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathleen R. Martwick, Associate 
Regional Counsel, by mail at: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Regional Counsel (C-14J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604-3590, or by phone at: (312) 886-7166. A copy of the 
proposed administrative settlement agreement may be obtained in person 
or by mail from the EPA's Region 5 Office of Regional Counsel, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590. Additional background 
information relating to the settlement is available for review at the 
EPA's Region 5 Office of Regional Counsel.

    Authority: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675.

    Dated: September 18, 2009.
Douglas Ballotti,
Acting Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E9-23689 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Official Journal C 387/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 387 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6424 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 387

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6424 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 387/01 | Euro exchange rates — 23 September 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 387/01

Euro exchange rates — 23 September 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 387/02 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of electrolytic chromium coated steel (ECCS) products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Brazil | 2 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 387/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10338 – Galileo/M6/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2021/C 387/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10453 — Blackstone/Francisco/Dynamo) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 17 |
| 2021/C 387/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10401 — SAMI/Dussur/FGA/SAMI Figeac Aero Manufacturing JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 19 |
| 2021/C 387/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10347 — Synthos/Trinseo (synthetic rubber business)) (
  1
  ) | 21 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 387/02

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of electrolytic chromium coated steel (ECCS) products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Brazil

2

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 387/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10338 – Galileo/M6/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

2021/C 387/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10453 — Blackstone/Francisco/Dynamo) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

17

2021/C 387/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10401 — SAMI/Dussur/FGA/SAMI Figeac Aero Manufacturing JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

19

2021/C 387/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10347 — Synthos/Trinseo (synthetic rubber business)) (
  1
  )

1

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Selwyn A. ROBINSON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. George R. ARIYOSHI, Governor, et al. Defendants-Appellants, v. McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, Limited, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 78-2264.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 8, 1986.

Alexander C. Marrack, Hoddick, Reinwald, O’Connor & Marrack, for plaintiffsappellees.

J. Russell Cades, Robert B. Bunn, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, Honolulu, Hawaii, Telford Taylor, Taylor, Ferencz & Simon, Herbert Wechsler, New York City, William F. Quinn, Honolulu, Hawaii, Clinton Shiraishi, Shiraishi & Yamada, Lihue, Hawaii, for McBryde Sugar Co. Ltd., et al.

Williamson B.C. Chang, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, amicus curiae.

Ronald Albu, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Waihe’e Farmers Residents Ass’n.

Clinton R. Ashford, Mitsuo Uyehara, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Ass’n.

Andrew S.O. Lee, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellants.

James H. Dannenberg, First Deputy Atty. Gen., Corinne K.A. Watanabe, Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioners Ariyoshi, et al., on certiorari.

Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellants, on certiorari and on remand.

Before GOODWIN and TANG, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, * District Judge.

*

The Honorable Robert A. Grant, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States in *George R. Ariyoshi, Governor of Hawaii, et al. v. Selwyn A. Robinson, et al.,*— U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3269, 91 L.Ed.2d 560 (1986) the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consideration in light of *Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City,*473 U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986).
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1215.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Motorized Wheeled Armored Vehicles 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and UZBEKISTAN 

Signed at Tashkent November 17, 2011 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
UZBEKISTAN 

Defense: Motorized Wheeled 

 Armored Vehicles 

 Agreement signed at Tashkent November 17, 2011; 

 Entered into force December 15, 2011. 

 With annex.
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 26, 2021 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2021-2 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2023, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of May, 2023.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
Served: August 14 , 2012



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 14 th day of August, 2012

NOTICE

The Department issued Order 2012

- 7

- 19 (July 17 , 2012) requesting proposals from carriers

interested in providing Essential Air Service (EAS) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri . The Order

established August 15 , 2012 as the due date for proposals. The Department has received a

request from Air Choice One to extend the deadline for submissions. The airport and

neighboring communities have not stated an objection to this extension. Therefore, we are

granting an ex tension of the filing dead line by two weeks. Responses will now be due August 29

, 2012.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available

on the World Wide Web at http://www.regualtions.gov Essential Air Service at

FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI

Under 49 U.S.C. § 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1167
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2587

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 555 South 3rd Street Lobby in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Kenneth T. 
                   Whalum, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KENNETH T. WHALUM, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 555 South 3rd Street Lobby in Memphis, Tennessee, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kenneth T. Whalum, Sr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kenneth T. 
Whalum, Sr. Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
H. R. 2570 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk 

Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.