alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50216-50217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 19, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Democracy Two, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-451-3398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0c8c1d9c5d3cae0cdc1c9cc8ecec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="731b120a160019331e121a1f5d1d1a1b5d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 50217]]


    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23611 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 8.23 Examination in connection with total disability benefits.

Physical examination in connection with claim for total disability benefits may be made by a medical officer of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, or Public Health Service, or may be made at Government expense by a full-time or part-time salaried physician or physician's assistant at a regional office or medical facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs. If an insured is unable to travel, because of physical or mental condition, the Director of a regional office or of a medical facility may, on his or her own initiative or at the request of the Insurance activity concerned, authorize at Government expense examination at the residence of the insured. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may require such further medical examination or such additional medical evidence as may be deemed necessary and proper to establish the physical and mental condition of the insured.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1912(b))

[47 FR 11659, Mar. 18, 1982. Redesignated at 61 FR 29290, June 10, 1996. Redesignated at 65 FR 7437, Feb. 15, 2000]
# Official Journal C 13/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 13 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5019 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 13

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5019 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 013/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4320 — ONEX Corporation/AON Warranty Group) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 013/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4168 — Österreichische POST/TRANS-O-FLEX) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 013/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4429 — AIG/GIP/Stratfield) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 013/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4320 — ONEX Corporation/AON Warranty Group) (1)

1

2007/C 013/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4168 — Österreichische POST/TRANS-O-FLEX) (1)

1

2007/C 013/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4429 — AIG/GIP/Stratfield) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 013/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 013/04

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1200.3 Official logo and seal. This section describes and displays the logo adopted by the Director as the official symbol representing FHFA. It is displayed on correspondence, selected documents, and signage. The logo serves as the official seal to certify and authenticate official documents of the agency. ( a ) *Description.* The logo is a disc consisting of three polygons each drawn in a manner resembling a silhouette of a pitched roof house and with distinctive eaves under its roof. Each polygon is placed one in front of the other, two of which are diminished in size from the polygon behind it. Placed in the center of the smallest polygon is the acronym for the organization, “FHFA.” The polygons are encircled by a designation scroll having a solid background and containing the words “FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY” in capital letters with serifs, with two mullets on the extreme left and right of the scroll. Upon approval by the Director, FHFA may employ variations of the color or shading of its logo and seal for specified purposes; these will be available for reference on the agency Web site at *www.fhfa.gov .*
( b ) *Display.* FHFA's official logo and seal appears below:
[77 FR 73264, Dec. 10, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 45599, July 31, 2015]
#### John Seward, jun. *against*Samuel F. Payne.

ON CERTIORARI.

Action for labour, &c. *(a)*

evidence *ent overruled,

(a)

**See *Erving vs. Ingram, 4 Zab. 520. Haslack vs. Mayers, 2 Dutch. 291. Beach vs. Mullin, 5 Vr. 343.*

OPINION of the Court.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

The state of demand, in this case, consists of the copy of an account for work and labour done by day’s work, at 1 dollar per day, giving the dates, that is to say, giving every day on which the day’s work was done. On the trial, many objections were raised by the defendant, *Payne,*against the evidence offered by *Seward.*Among other things, *Seward*offered to prove, that *Payne*had been absent a number of times, a week at a time, while in his employ, and *at the very time*and *for the very time*charged in his account. To this evidence, *Payne*objected, alleging, if the justice’s return be well understood, that *Seward*had theretofore sued him and recovered damages against him, for leaving his work while in his employ; and the justice sustained the objection, and overruled the evidence.

*102But this was a mistake, for it is manifest, that although might have recovered damages against him, for absenting himself from his duty, and leaving his work undone, yet that did not authorize him, in the settlement of his accounts, to charge for the *very time in which he had been absent. The injury of which *Seward*complained, and for which he had recovered, if he had recovered at all, was for deserting his work and leaving it undone, and had nothing at all to do with the settlement of the account for the work actually done.

Let the judgment, therefore, be reversed.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo25443 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
----

# Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

      -  Home
      -  About
      -  Search
      -  List All

NED/SIPS: a stand inventory processor and simulator program for forests of the Northeastern United States

 System Details :

System requirements: 80386- or 80486-based machine; 550K of main memory; DOS version 3.3 or later; 1 MB of free hard disk space; designed to use Expanded (EMS) or eXtended (XMS) memory.

 Notes :

Title from title screen.Title on manual: NED/SIPS user's manual, Northeast Decision Model Stand Inventory Processor and Simulator.Distributed to depository libraries on floppy disk, shipping list no.: 96-0254-P."June 1995"--User's manual, p. [2] of cover.

 Subject Headings :

Forest management -- United States -- SoftwareTrees -- United States -- Growth -- SoftwareForest surveys -- United States -- Software

 Record Info : 

(OCoLC)ocm33091111(GPO)96071997A 13.88 NE-205/FLOPPY(InU)BND9420SE(InU)AGB2864BB

      Indiana University Catalog Information

## A 13.88: NE-205/DISK

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## A 13.88: NE-205/DISK

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

Raw Mets Record

----

IU Bloomington Libraries

           Comments: libgpd@indiana.edu

  			Hosted by the IU Digital Library Program

----

        - Copyright  © 				    
2012
 				The Trustees of  Indiana University
        - Copyright Complaints
        - Libraries Privacy Policy
        - Accessibility Help
----

Action brought on 10 October 2005 — Buendía Sierra v Commission

(Case T-380/05)

(2006/C 10/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Buendía Sierra (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude, V. Landes, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant advances pleas similar to those he advanced previously in Case T-311/04 (1), an action also brought by him.

----

(1)OJ C 262, 23.10.2004, p. 44

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCandela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedDecember 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | February 9, 2004 |                                  | /s/ Gerard E. Puorro |   |
|--------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Gerard E. Puorro                      |
|   |                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
## SERVED: March 19, 2014

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF HOTTON ENTERPRISES,

### INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1081


### NOTICE OF HEARING DATES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered onMay 27 and 28, 2014, inclusive, in Courtroom406 [U.S. Tax Court], SandraDay O'Connor Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse onorbefore 5:00p.m. each day. Settled·cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the properpleading(s). Pleadings1may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service2•

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge

Attachment- Service List
1 Materials filed in theFAA Hearing Docket (except for materials which are sealed) also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. For additional information see: http://dms.dot.gov. 2 The Administrator's civilpenalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions, theRules ofPractice, as well as othermaterials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: http://www.(aa.gov/aboutlo(fice org/headquarters o(fices!agc/pol adjudicationlagc400/civil penalty!; see also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgilt/textltext-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse!Titlel4114tab 02. tpl. In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are availablethrough LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database. For additional information, see the Web site.

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY



### Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-. Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Ashok Vij, President/CEO 

### HottonEnterprises, Inc. 

### d/b/a/ Premier Aviation, Respondent 

### 1951 East Airport Drive Tucson, AZ 85756 TEL: 520-907-8926 FAX: NOT PROVIDED Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

### FDMS No. FAA-2013-1081 (Civil Penalty Action)

Office oftheRegional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region, APW-7.12 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 425-227-2914 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. · 2
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company,LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2021 (as amended from time totime, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2021-A, doeshereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2024.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheet as of June 30, 1997 and income statement for the six months then ended.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191
<INVENTORY>                                        931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,244
<PP&E>                                           7,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,170
<BONDS>                                          3,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,463
<SALES>                                          5,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,065
<CGS>                                            3,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
STAJ

4 L o REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
Richard W. Corey. Executive Officer California AirResources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento. CA 5812 DearMr. Corey: On April 7, 2015, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We havereviewedmaterials submitted with the followingrules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. APCD/AQMD__j_Rule #

# [ Rule Title Monterey Bay 201 Sources NotRequiring Permits Monterey Bay 1002 TransferofGasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks Reduction ofNOx Emissions fromNatural Gas-Fired, South Coast 1 1 1 1 Fan-Type Furnaces MotorVehicle and Mobile EquipmentNon-Assembly South Coast 1151 Line Coating Operations South Coast 1 153.1 Emissions ofNitrogen from Commercial Food Oven SanJoaquin 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type Central Furnaces Vailey Ventura County 74.33 Liquefied Petroleum Gas TransferorDispensing This addresses all ofthe SIP revisions in CARB’s April 7, 2015 submittal. In the coming months we will review the completerevisions for actionpursuant to Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY



## APR 3 0 2015

Sincerely,

Jordan Director. AirDivision

f’r,nted Oil l?e ye/edPapercc: Richard Stedman Air Pollution Control Officer Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District 245 X0 Silver Cloud Court Monterey. California 93940 Sevecl Sadredin Executive Director Air Pollution Control Officer San .Toaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 1990 East Gettysburg Avenue Presno California 03726 Barry Wallerstein Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management District 21 X65 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91 7654 1 X2 Mike Villegas Air Pollution Control Ofticer Ventura Counts’ Air Pollution Control District (6O County Square Drive Second Floor Ventura. California 93003 Karen Magliano. Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division Calilbrnia \ir Resources Board Post Office Box 2X15 Sacramento. CA 958 12
42129.

#### HARRIS v. BETHEL AIR CONDITIONING & ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Where it appeared from the pleadings and from depositions in support of defendant’s motion for summary judgment that plaintiff had contracted with the defendant for the removal of floor furnaces and the installation of a duct system of heating and air conditioning her home, and that while the work was in progress the workmen removed the grille from one of the floor furnaces, pulled the furnace and within less than a minute plaintiff, walking from one room to another across the hall to secure a memorandum, stepped into the hole left by removal of the furnace and was injured/the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judg*256ment was proper. Plaintiff’s contention that the defendant was negligent in failing to warn her of the opening in the floor, or in failing to cover it immediately upon removing the furnace is without merit. *Lunsford v. Childs,*107 Ga. App. 210 (129 SE2d 398). No reason appears in the pleadings or in the evidence submitted why plaintiff could not, in the exercise of ordinary care for her own safety, have avoided stepping into the hole. It was work in progress in her own home which she had engaged to be done. It was in the daytime, and no reason appears why she could not have seen it. *Nechtman v. B. Thorpe & Co.,*99 Ga. App. 626 (109 SE2d 633). See also *Lane Drug Stores v. Story,*72 Ga. App. 886 (35 SE2d 472); *Lanier v. Turner,*73 Ga. App. 749, 753 (38 SE2d 55); *Stephens v. Dover Elevator Co.,*109 Ga. App. 112 (135 SE2d 593). In her deposition plaintiff answered in response to the question as to why she did not see the opening, “Well, I guess I wasn’t looking, because I fell into it.” “[WJhere it is perfectly obvious and apparent, so that one looking ahead would necessarily see it, the fact that the plaintiff merely failed to look will not relieve him from the responsibility for his misadventure.” *Moore v. Kroger Co.,*87 Ga. App. 581, 583 (74 SE2d 481). Accord: *Mills v. Barker,*38 Ga. App. 734 (145 SE 672); *National Bellas-Hess Co. v. Patrick,*49 Ga. App. 280 (175 SE 255); *Tinley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.,*70 Ga. App. 390 (28 SE2d 322); *White v. City of Manchester,*92 Ga. App. 642, 644 (2) (89 SE2d 581).

Argued July 7, 1966

Decided September 6, 1966.

*Frank B. Zeigler,*for appellant.

*Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams & Levy, Frank W. Seiler,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 4.41

                                   SCHEDULE
 (Setting Forth Information on Substantially Identical Notes Dated May 1, 2000
In  the  Principal Amount of $ 80,000 Made Payable to the Order of Apple Suites,
                                     Inc.)

     Apple  Suites,  Inc.  holds 11 promissory notes, which are identical to the
Note  included  in  this  filing  as  Exhibit  4.40,  except  for  the following
particulars:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               LOCATION OF HOTEL
         (STATED IN SECTION 5 OF NOTE)                   MAKER OF NOTE
        -------------------------------   -------------------------------------------
<S>     <C>                               <C>
1.      Atlanta, Georgia (1 of 2)         Apple Suites Management, Inc.
2.      Atlanta, Georgia (2 of 2)         Apple Suites Management, Inc.
3.      Baltimore, Maryland               Apple Suites Management, Inc.
4.      Clearwater, Florida               Apple Suites Management, Inc.
5.      Warren, Michigan                  Apple Suites Management, Inc.
6.      Midvale, Utah                     Apple Suites Management, Inc.
7.      Jackson, Mississippi              Apple Suites Management, Inc.
8.      Malvern, Pennsylvania             Apple Suites Management, Inc.
9.      Addison, Texas                    Apple Suites Services Limited Partnership*
10.     Irving, Texas                     Apple Suites Services Limited Partnership*
11.     Plano, Texas                      Apple Suites Services Limited Partnership*
* Subsidiary of Apple Suites Management, Inc.
</TABLE>
# RECEIVED JUN 

## 162010 

# m, PROTECTIONBRANCH PUBLISIIING COMPANY, INC. 

### AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STAlCE OF 0~~ 

### cow OF Dou'mwm .. .. . .. . . .



### Sworn to and subscribed before