alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 66/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5111 March 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 66

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5111 March 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 066/01 | Commission Report pursuant to Article 28(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalized tariff preferences | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 066/01

Commission Report pursuant to Article 28(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalized tariff preferences

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1081.108 Good faith certification. ( a ) *General requirement.* Every filing or submission of record following the issuance of a notice of charges must be signed by at least one counsel of record in counsel's individual name and must state counsel's address, email address, and telephone number. A party who acts as the party's own counsel must sign the party's individual name and state the party's address, email address, and telephone number on every filing or submission of record. Papers filed by electronic transmission may be signed with an “/s/” notation, which will be deemed the signature of the party or representative whose name appears below the signature line.
( b ) *Effect of signature.* ( 1 ) The signature of counsel or a party constitutes a certification that: The counsel or party has read the filing or submission of record; to the best of one's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the filing or submission of record is well-grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and the filing or submission of record is not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
( 2 ) If a filing or submission of record is not signed, the hearing officer must strike the filing or submission of record, unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the filer.
( c ) *Effect of making oral motion or argument.* The act of making any oral motion or oral argument by any counsel or party constitutes a certification that to the best of one's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, one's statements are well-grounded in fact and are warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and are not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
( d ) *Sanctions.* Counsel or a party that fails to abide by the requirements of this section may be subject to sanctions pursuant to § 1081.104(b)(13).
§ 21.8310 Rate of pursuit. ( a ) *General requirements.* VA will approve an eligible child's pursuit of a vocational training program at a rate consistent with his or her ability to successfully pursue training, considering: ( 1 ) Effects of his or her disability;
( 2 ) Family responsibilities;
( 3 ) Travel;
( 4 ) Reasonable adjustment to training; and
( 5 ) Other circumstances affecting the child's ability to pursue training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( b ) *Continuous pursuit.* An eligible child should pursue a program of vocational training with as little interruption as necessary, considering the factors in paragraph (a) of this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( c ) *Responsibility for determining the rate of pursuit.* VR&E staff members will consult with the child when determining the rate and continuity of pursuit of a vocational training program. These staff members will also confer with the medical consultant and the Vocational Rehabilitation Panel described in §§ 21.60 and 21.62, as necessary. This rate and continuity of pursuit determination will occur during development of the individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation, but may change later, as necessary to enable the child to complete training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( d ) *Measurement of training time used.* VA will measure the rate of pursuit in a comparable manner to rate of pursuit measurement under § 21.310 for veterans under the 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 program.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.99 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          55,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             229
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,245
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    205,478
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         140,094
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           145,161
<LOANS>                                      1,320,293
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,805,919
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,485,526
<SHORT-TERM>                                    44,731
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,907
<LONG-TERM>                                     85,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,565
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,805,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 59,922
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,775
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   864
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                70,561
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,469
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,107
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           37,455
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,456
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,555
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,555
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,236
<LOANS-PAST>                                       433
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,090
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,113
<RECOVERIES>                                       164
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,298
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,298
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 14, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,027
<INVENTORY>                                      3,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,402
<PP&E>                                          12,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,374
<BONDS>                                         26,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,123
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,089)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,612
<SALES>                                          2,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,352
<CGS>                                            1,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (234)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,107)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,973)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
41873.

#### HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DECATUR v. SCHROEDER.

Deen, Judge.

This court having on March 8, 1966, entered judgment in the above styled case, 113 Ga. App. 432 (148 SE2d 188), affirming the judgment of the trial court, and that *461judgment having been reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court in *Housing Authority of the City of Decatur v. Schroeder,*222 Ga. 417 (151 SE2d 226), the judgment of this court heretofore rendered is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court with direction that a new trial be granted in this case.

Decided September 29, 1966

Rehearing denied October 13, 1966

*George H. Parley, Claude E. Hambrick,*for appellant.

*George P. Dillard,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
PUBLIC LAW 107–160—APR. 18, 2002 116 STAT. 123

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1432:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Dec. 19, 20, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): Mar. 22, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–160

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3698 Inner

Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Lyn

McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

Approved April 18, 2002.

Apr. 18, 2002

[H.R. 1432]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                 3200
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                          2600
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          35,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     65,000
<PP&E>                                 2000
<DEPRECIATION>                     (18,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      157,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               449,500
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            101,000
<OTHER-SE>                         (290,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        157,800
<SALES>                               8,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      8,200
<CGS>                                 2,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (3,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (3,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (3,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.01)



</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50263 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DAVID AARON DIAZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 708

- 1

Before JOLLY , HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent David Aaron Diaz has moved for

le ave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Diaz h a s not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counsel’s brief s and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50263 Document: 00514122856 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 50263

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANT ED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50263 Document: 00514122856 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN:_____

_____ SE01958

_____________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
CURTESY.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1889.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### SHADDINGER v. FISHER.

Is Subject to Payment of His Wife’s Debts.

The husband takes his curtesy subject to the payment of his wife’s debts.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

Swing, J.

The action below was by Fisher, to recover the value of his curtesy in certain real estate of which his wife died seized. Fisher’s wife and her two brothers were the owners of the fee, and their mother had a dower interest therein. The property was sold after the death of Fisher’s wife, all joining in the deed, and the purchase-money paid to the mother, M rs. Shaddinger.

The claim of Fisher was against'Mrs. Shaddinger, for the amount of his curtesy, claiming that amount was to be paid him out of the purchase-money.

The value of the fee (the one-third) was about $4,600. The value of plaintiff’s curtesy, as found by the court, was about $2,900. In the answer of defendant a claim is set up that the defendant, Mrs. Shaddinger, was the guardian of Fisher’s wife, during her minority, and that as such she had a claim against her estate, for the sum of $800. That on the settlement of her accounts, the probate court had found that amount due her, and that the costs of administration was the sum of $750.

*382Kramer & Kramer, for plaintiff in error.

Mallon & Coffey and N. Bird, for defendant in error.

It appears from the record that such was the case, together with the fact that an appeal had been taken to the court of common pleas, from the finding of the probate court, and that the matter was still pending there.

If the case is decided in favor of Mrs. Shaddinger, she would have a judgment against the estate of her ward, Fisher’s wife, for an amount, including costs, of something near $2,000. ■

If Fisher is to receive the $2,900, there would not be enough left to pay this judgment.

Fisher sued for the value of his curtesy in said real estate. The amount allowed him by the court below was given on the whole amount of the purchase-money of the wife’s interest, and without regard to his wife’s debts.

In so deciding, it seems to us that the court below was at least premature, if not wrong.

We believe the law to be that the husband takes his curtesy subject to the payment of the wife’s debts,

In the present case there is a claim of nearly $2,000 against the wife’s estate, and if judgment is obtained (as it was in the court below), it must be paid regardless of the husband’s claim for the curtesy — but the property did not sell for enough to pay this amount, and the amount allowed Fisher for his curtes)'-, by about $900.

Therefore it seems to us, that the court could not rightfully have found the value of Fisher’s curtesy in said premises to be the amount for which judgment was given.

For this reason it seems to us the judgment should be reversed and remanded for farther proceedings, and that of necessity this matter should be held for determination until the other matter is decided.
Order issued October 20, 2014

S

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

________________________________________

No. 05-14-00193-CR

________________________________________

PATRICIA ANN SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

O R D E R

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the June 3, 2014 motion of Niles 

Illich for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court 

to remove Niles Illich as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Patricia Ann Smith, TDCJ No.

1907479, Hilltop Unit, 1500 State School Road, Gatesville, Texas, 76598-2996.

/ Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC  OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company, LLC (the “Servicer”), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this  certificate in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2020- P1 Servicing Agreement dated as of December 10, 2020, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust  2020-P1, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2023.  By: _______________________________  Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  Exhibit 35.1 /s/ Daniel Gaudreau