alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,351)
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,143
<PP&E>                                           4,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,835
<OTHER-SE>                                    (39,648)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,187
<SALES>                                          4,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,340
<CGS>                                            4,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.





/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-AMarch 24, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                            913,716
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      15,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        66,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,004,048
<PP&E>                                              4,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                         68
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,129,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             152,129
<BONDS>                                             6,000   
<COMMON>                                          341,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        348,343      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      690,284
<SALES>                                            40,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   40,548
<CGS>                                              12,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      12,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  343,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 26,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (315,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (315,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (111,450)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (426,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.04)
<CHANGES>                                               0                                    
        

</TABLE>
42205.

#### RIDER v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Dawson County for the offense of possessing nontaxpaid liquor. The only issue before this court on appeal is whether evidence admitted at the trial was obtained by use of an illegal search warrant. The State introduced parol evidence as to the issuance of the search warrant and facts contained therein relative to the showing of probable cause before the magistrate.

*348Submitted September 12, 1966

Decided September 26, 1966.

*Brannon & Brannon, E. C. Brannon, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor General, C. Frank Strickland, Jr.,*for appellee.

1. .Where a paper which would be admissible in evidence is lost or destroyed, its contents are provable by parol, after proof of loss or destruction; the question of the party’s diligence in regard to its inaccessibility is for the sound dicretion of the trial court. *Code*§ 38-702; *Graham v. Campbell,*56 Ga. 258, 261; *Phillips v. Lindsey,*65 Ga. 139, 143; *Turner v. Elliott,*127 Ga. 338 (56 SE 434). We cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting parol testimony of the search warrant.

2. The information presented under oath to the magistrate in this case was sufficient to support a finding of probable cause. *Marshall v. State,*113 Ga. App. 143 (147 SE2d 666)..

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
#### § 4.65 [Reserved]
#### § 39.120 Documentation of grant accomplishments.

Within 60 days of completion of an Operation and Maintenance Project, the State or Tribal Organization must submit to VCGS a written report regarding the work performed to meet VA's national shrine standards. This report must be based on the original justification for the grant as noted in § 39.81(b)(10) and must include statistical data and detailed pictures of the work accomplished.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)

[77 FR 4478, Jan. 30, 2012]
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Cameroon

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Cameroon			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Cameroon 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Cameroon

During the review period, budget documents were widely and easily accessible to the public online.  Information in budget documents, however, was incomplete.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available and updated quarterly, including for state-owned enterprises.  Allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises were not identified in budget documents, and few state-owned enterprises produced financial statements.  The government did not review its budget throughout the year.  The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to adequate audit or oversight, and there were similar concerns regarding the budget for military and intelligence services.  The information in the budget was considered generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not audit the government’s executed budget.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Cameroon’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Including allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises in its budget;
- Making audited financial statements for state-owned enterprises publicly available;
- Eliminating off-budget accounts or subjecting them to adequate audit and oversight;
- Subjecting military and intelligence budgets to civilian oversight;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence; and
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution audits the government’s executed budget, makes its reports publicly available and follows up on its findings.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Cameroon 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsCameroonDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
42333.

#### UNDERCOFLER, Commissioner v. THOMPSON INDUSTRIES, INC.

Jordan, Judge.

Thompson Industries, Inc. appealed to Lowndes Superior Court on a sales and use tax assessment covering the taxable period from January 1960 through December 1962, and the State Revenue Commissioner has appealed to this court from an adverse decision of the trial court.

The stipulated facts show that the taxpayer is engaged in the manufacture of bright metal parts used as trim and accessories in the production of automobiles, home appliances and other durable consumer goods. The taxpayer obtains tooling required to stamp out these parts from a tool and die plant in accordance with its customer’s design and engineering drawings, in turn selling the tooling to its customers at cost plus sales tax, but retaining the tooling for use in producing the parts thereafter ordered by the customer. After examining the tooling, the customer then authorizes the taxpayer to proceed with the production of the product in such quantities as it desires. The customer might, and often does, require modifications in the tooling from time to time due to engineering changes, model changes or for other reasons.

In general, the same tool and die company which made the original tooling makes the modifications at the request of the *498taxpayer, who pays for the changes, free of any sales tax, and charges its customers the exact cost of the changes. Materials used in such modifications are negligible, and the cost is primarily for services, i.e., engineering, precision work by skilled laborers, and use of equipment, in changing the tooling to enable the taxpayer to produce parts meeting the needs of its customers.

Argued September 7, 1966

Decided October 21, 1966.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, William L. Harper, Louis F. McDonald, Assistant Attorneys General,*for appellant.

*Tillman, Brice, McTier & Coleman, B. Lamar Tillman,*for appellee.

The sales tax was collected and remitted for the cost of the original tooling and the sole issue here is whether the taxpayer properly excluded from its tax base the charges made for modifying the tooling sold to and owned by its customers. *Held:*

Charges by a taxpayer to its customers for modifications in tooling sold by the taxpayer to its customers, but retained and used by the taxpayer to manufacture stamped bright metal parts for the customers, such charges representing the costs to the taxpayer of tax-free services generally obtained from a third party, without any specific charge for the negligible use of materials, are charges for “. . . services rendered in . . . remodeling or repairing property sold . . .” and were therefore properly excluded from the taxable sales price defined in Section 3(c) 3(a) *{Code Ann.*§ 92-3403a E) of the Georgia Retailers’ and Consumers’ Sales and Use Tax Act.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Bberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 1081.403 Briefs filed with the Director. ( a ) *Contents of briefs.* Briefs must be confined to the particular matters at issue. Each exception to the findings or conclusions being reviewed should be stated succinctly. Exceptions must be supported by citation to the relevant portions of the record, including references to the specific pages relied upon, and by concise argument including citation of such statutes, decisions, and other authorities as may be relevant. If the exception relates to the admission or exclusion of evidence, the substance of the evidence admitted or excluded must be set forth in the brief, in an appendix thereto, or by citation to the record. Reply briefs must be confined to matters in answering briefs of other parties.
( b ) *Length limitation.* Except with leave of the Director, opening and answering briefs may not exceed 30 pages, and reply briefs may not exceed 15 pages, exclusive of pages containing the table of contents, table of authorities, and any addendum that consists solely of copies of applicable cases, pertinent legislative provisions or rules, and exhibits. Motions to file briefs in excess of these limitations are disfavored.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 48617)    
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold an Open Meeting on Monday, October 5, 2009, in the Multipurpose Room, L-006. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and will be open to the public, with seating on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 8:30 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks.

On September 15, 2009, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9064), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting. The agenda for the meeting includes: (i) A presentation by SEC staff of potential Commission initiatives; (ii) description of the composition and purpose of the Committee's subcommittees; (iii) consideration of a Committee recusal policy; (iv) reports from the Committee's subcommittees; and (v) discussion of next steps for the Committee, including regarding SEC resources.

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 21, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-23016 Filed 9-21-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-1001 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SOCIAL SECURITY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAPAN 

Signed at Washington February 19, 2004 

 

 with 

 

Administrative Arrangement 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
JAPAN 

Social Security 

 Agreement signed at Washington February 19, 2004; 

 Entered into force October 1, 2005. 

 With administrative arrangement. 












1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
#### THOMAS M. BLAKE v. UNITED STATES MACHINERY *&*METAL SALES CO. v. UNITED STATES

[58 C. Cls. 58; 57 C. Cls. 197; 263 *U.*S. 730]

Judgments were rendered in the court below in favor of the United States. Plaintiffs appealed. The *appeals were dismissed.*
#### § 1208.81 Right of action.

FHFA may sue any employer for any amount that the employer fails to withhold from wages owed and payable to its employee in accordance with this subpart E. However, a suit will not be filed before the termination of the collection action involving a particular debtor, unless earlier filing is necessary to avoid expiration of any applicable statute of limitations. For purposes of this subpart E, “termination of the collection action” occurs when the agency has terminated collection action in accordance with the FCCS or other applicable standards. In any event, termination of the collection action will have been deemed to occur if FHFA has not received any payments to satisfy the debt from the particular debtor whose wages were subject to garnishment, in whole or in part, for a period of one (1) year.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128916 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GWANJUN KIM and KEESOO KIM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128916 

 COA: 260071 

Kent CC: 03-008356-CZ 

KIA MOTORS AMERICA, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to consider the meaning of “deceptive” and 

“misleading” as those words appear in MCL 445.356(1). 

t0120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 27, 2006 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at April 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and the Statement
of Income for the Quarter Ended April 30, 1999 (Unaudited). It is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Apr-30-1999
<CASH>                                       (3553)
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               228143
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 399777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            694638
<PP&E>                                      181703
<DEPRECIATION>                              145381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              869721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       247444
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    281001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                869721
<SALES>                                     306154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            306154
<CGS>                                        78209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               165794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              8761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              53391
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 53391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.01

</TABLE>