alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DAVID M

. ENDERSBEE DIRECT DIAL (202) 973

- 79 35 dmendersbee @zsrlaw.com 

### ZUCKERT SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P

. ATTORNEYS AT LAW
888 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006

- 3309 Telephone [202] 298

- 8660 Fax [202] 342

- 0683 www.zsrlaw.com

July 12, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Robert Finamore Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590
Re: Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji Airways Docket DOT

- OST

- 2005

- 21868

Dear Mr. Finamore:
On July 11 , 2013, Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji Airways filed an Application for Renewal of Exemption in the above

- referenced docket. We have completed polling all parties on the service list, and no party has stated any objection to the application or to the request for expedited treatment. We respectfully request that the Department proceed to grant the requested authorit y as soon as possible. A copy of this letter will be submitted to the docket and to all persons on the service list.

Sincerely ,

David M. Endersbee Counsel for Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji Airways

cc: service list
#### § 4.58 Arthritis due to strain.

With service incurred lower extremity amputation or shortening, a disabling arthritis, developing in the same extremity, or in both lower extremities, with indications of earlier, or more severe, arthritis in the injured extremity, including also arthritis of the lumbosacral joints and lumbar spine, if associated with the leg amputation or shortening, will be considered as service incurred, provided, however, that arthritis affecting joints not directly subject to strain as a result of the service incurred amputation will not be granted service connection. This will generally require separate evaluation of the arthritis in the joints directly subject to strain. Amputation, or injury to an upper extremity, is not considered as a causative factor with subsequently developing arthritis, except in joints subject to direct strain or actually injured.
# Official Journal C 344/13 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 344 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6013 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 344

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6013 October 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 344/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 344/02 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity and Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 32 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 344/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

1

2017/C 344/02

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity and Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

32

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert F.X.Sillerman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

**Dated:  May 9, 2006**
|        |   | By:    |   | /s/ ROBERT  F. X. SILLERMAN                         |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Robert F. X. Sillerman                              |
|   |   |   |   | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board* |
|   |   |   |   | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                     |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 4.98


 


 The Guaranty Contract


 


Contract No.: SJZ0910120140044-14


Guarantor : Hebei Ruituo Auto Trading Co., Ltd


Guarantee : Hua Xia Bank Shijiazhuang Jianhua Branch


Signing Date : October 8, 2014


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party B
(Guarantee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trading Group Co., Ltd., Party A (Guarantor) is willing to provide guaranty for Party
B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB150,000,000


 


Pledge Term
: From July19,2015 to July18,2017
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2016-4223

 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-108-AD

GV AMM, R43 --- 2/15/2015

G550 AMM, R24 --- 2/15/2015

G500 AMM, R24 --- 2/15/2015

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the September 30, 1996
10-Q and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             131
<SECURITIES>                                     40130
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   602
<PP&E>                                            3392
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   49703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                       11431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     49703
<SALES>                                          22181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 22181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 20137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1386
<INCOME-TAX>                                       517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                869
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 21/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.021.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 21 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5425 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.021.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 21

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5425 January 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 58/2011 of 24 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/47/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 January 2011 on a derogation from the rules of origin set out in Council Decision 2001/822/EC as regards sugar from the Netherlands Antilles
  (notified under document C(2011) 140) | 3 |
| | | 2011/48/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 24 January 2011 concerning the placing on the market for essential use of biocidal products containing temephos in the French overseas departments
  (notified under document C(2011) 167) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EU) No 58/2011 of 24 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

2011/47/EU

*

Commission Decision of 20 January 2011 on a derogation from the rules of origin set out in Council Decision 2001/822/EC as regards sugar from the Netherlands Antilles
  (notified under document C(2011) 140)

(notified under document C(2011) 140)

3

2011/48/EU

*

Commission Decision of 24 January 2011 concerning the placing on the market for essential use of biocidal products containing temephos in the French overseas departments
  (notified under document C(2011) 167)

(notified under document C(2011) 167)

6

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Directive 2010/84/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards pharmacovigilance, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 348, 31.12.2010) | 8 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Directive 2010/84/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards pharmacovigilance, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 348, 31.12.2010)

(OJ L 348, 31.12.2010)

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00752-CR

David Jacob Garcia, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 05-1075-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due March 23, 2006. The time for filing was

extended to May 22, 2006, on counsel’s motion. On June 9, 2006, no brief having been filed, this

Court ordered appellant’s attorney, Mr. John R. Duer, to file a brief on appellant’s behalf no later

than June 30, 2006. Counsel did not file a brief as ordered.

The appeal is abated. The district court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

Mr. Duer, the attorney it appointed, has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The

court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint

substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant on appeal. A record from this hearing,

including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be
2

forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than August 11,

2006. Rule 38.8(b)(3).

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: July 28, 2006

Do Not Publish
# C_2013298EN.01001102.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/11

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Sun Capital Partners v OHIM — Sun Capital Partners (SUN CAPITAL)

(Case T-164/13) (1)

1

2013/C 298/19

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Ingrid Wiik, Chief Executive Officer of Alpharma Inc., certify that:



1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alpharma Inc.;



2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;



(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.









Date: November 8, 2005

/s/ Ingrid WiikIngrid Wiik 
President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

SELMA PINCHEFSKY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 96-1898

COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF

AMERICA, AFL-CIO,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-615)

Submitted: March 31, 1997

Decided: April 11, 1997

Before HALL, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Beverly D. Crawford, Sa'ad El-Amin, EL-AMIN & CRAWFORD,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberly Neeb, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Selma Pinchefsky appeals the district court's order granting the

Communications Workers of America AFL-CIO's (CWA) motion for

summary judgment. She claims that the district court erred in finding

that her claim for breach of the duty of fair representation against

CWA was barred by the applicable statute of limitations period. She

also claims that the district court erred in finding that her claim is

barred because she failed to avail herself of the union's internal

appeals procedure. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, § 10(b), 29 U.S.C.

§ 160(b) (1994), the statute of limitations period for Pinchefsky's

claim is six months. See DelCostello v. International Bhd. of

Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 169 (1983). The issue before us is whether

Pinchefsky should have known of her injury based on an August 3,

1994, meeting she had with the President of her local, in which CWA

claims Pinchefsky was informed that it intended to withdraw its arbitration demand previously advanced on her behalf. Pinchefsky testified in her deposition that she recalled this meeting, and that she was

informed at this meeting about CWA's internal appeals process.

While Pinchefsky later submitted an affidavit in which she denies

remembering the meeting, we agree with the district court that this

denial is not sufficient to overcome her deposition testimony, or to

create a genuine issue of material fact. See Military Servs. Realty, Inc.

v. Realty Consultants of Virginia, Ltd., 823 F.2d 829, 832 (4th Cir.

1987). We therefore find that Pinchefsky knew or should have known

that CWA was withdrawing its arbitration demand as of August 3,

1994, and that her claim is accordingly barred by the statute of limitations. We further find that Pinchefsky's claim is barred based on her

failure to avail herself of CWA's internal appeals process. See

Clayton v. United Auto. Workers, 451 U.S. 679, 681 (1981).

AFFIRMED

 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2654 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 391
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2654

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 26, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, as the 
               ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELEANOR MCGOVERN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eleanor 
McGovern Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 391

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2654

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, as the 
               ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
EDWARD D. BUNN,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

HELEN D. KARSH, 

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NOS. 1D14-1677 & 1D14-2361

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Toby S. Monaco, Judge.

Robert Bunn, Gainesville, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

James H. Wyman of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, for 

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.