alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

                       SCHEDULE OF NOVEMBER 2003 INVESTORS
                       -----------------------------------

Name of Investor                                                        Number
----------------                                                       of Shares
                                                                       ---------
Wellington Trust Company, National Association Multiple Common
    Trust Funds Trust, Emerging Companies Portfolio                      140,000
Wellington Trust Company, National Association Multiple Collective
    Investment Funds Trust, Emerging Companies Portfolio                 120,000
Wellington Management Portfolios (Dublin) -Global Smaller
    Companies Equity Portfolio                                             4,500
Baystar Capital II, LP                                                   454,714
SEI Institutional Investments Trust, Small Cap Fund                       91,000
SEI Institutional Managed Trust, Small Cap Growth Fund                   112,500
Seligman Global Fund Series, Inc., Seligman Global
    Smaller Companies Fund                                                63,000
Seligman Portfolios Inc., Seligman Global Smaller
    Companies Portfolio                                                    2,000
Government of Singapore Investment Company Pte., Ltd                     370,000
JB Were Global Small Companies Pooled Fund                                75,000
Talvest Global Small Cap Fund                                             22,000
TELUS Corporation Foreign Equity Active Plan                               9,500
New Zealand Funds Management Limited                                      17,000
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation                        43,000
Telstra Super Pty Ltd                                                     22,000
Oregon Investment Council                                                242,000
The Dow Chemical Employees' Retirement Plan                               85,000
The Retirement Program Plan for Employees of
    Union Carbide Corporation                                             72,000
Howard Hughes Medical Institute                                           87,000
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation                                        95,000
New York State Nurses Association Pension Plan                            52,000
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund                                             30,000
Laborers' District Council and Contractors' of
    Ohio Pension Fund                                                     24,000
Australian Retirement Fund                                                25,000
Emergency Services Superannuation Board                                   18,000
Retail Employees Superannuation Trust                                     27,000
BC Telecom Pension Plan for Management and Exempt Employees                4,500
David Cumming                                                              3,000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2052

THANH TAN NGUYEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, USPS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District

Judge. (8:13-cv-00800-AW)

Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 19, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thanh Tan Nguyen, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thanh Tan Nguyen appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his employment discrimination action for lack of 

jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Nguyen v. Donahoe, 

No. 8:13-cv-00800-AW (D. Md. July 12, 2013). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[112th Congress Public Law 115]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 337]]

Public Law 112-115
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the ``Private First 
    Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: May 15, 
                         2012 -  [H.R. 3004]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS ALEJANDRO R. RUIZ POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 15, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3004:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Nov. 14, 16, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Apr. 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4219 Incorporation by reference.

Department of Veterans Affairs regulations issued under 38 U.S.C. 3712, and in effect on the date of any loan which is submitted and accepted or approved for a guaranty thereunder, shall govern the rights, duties, and liabilities of the parties to such loan and any provisions of the loan instruments inconsistent with such regulations are hereby amended and supplemented to conform thereto.
FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE CUSTODY AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT effective as of the last date on the signature block, to the Custody Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of December 9, 2021, is entered into by and between MSD INVESTMENT CORP (f/k/a MSD Investment, LLC), a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America with its principal place of business at Minneapolis, Minnesota (the “Custodian”).

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into the Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to update the Company’s legal name from MSD Investment, LLC to MSD Investment Corp; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to update the fees; and

 

WHEREAS, Section 18.1 of the Agreement allows for its amendment by a written instrument executed by both parties.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

 

 

 

8.1	Fees.  The Custodian and the Document Custodian shall be entitled to compensation for their services in accordance with of that certain fee letter dated December 8, 2021, among the Company, the Custodian and the Document Custodian and as it relates to collateral segregation services in accordance with Exhibit B attached hereto.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

----

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Thirteenth Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more counterparts as of the date and year last written below.

 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

|        |                 |
|--------|-----------------|
| By:    | /s/ Greg Farley |
| Name:  | Greg Farley     |
| Title: | SVP             |
| Date:  | 11/11/2022      |

 

MSD INVESTMENT CORP

|        |                       |
|--------|-----------------------|
| By:    | /s/ Brian S. Williams |
| Name:  | Brian S. Williams     |
| Title: | CFO and Treasurer     |
| Date:  | 11/11/2022            |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
# Official Journal C 189/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 189 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4912 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 189

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4912 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 189/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 189/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4351 — Wolseley/DT Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 189/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 189/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4351 — Wolseley/DT Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 189/3 | Call for applications regarding Commission Decision of 14 July 2006 setting up a Standards Advice Review Group | 3 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 189/3

Call for applications regarding Commission Decision of 14 July 2006 setting up a Standards Advice Review Group

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2550 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2550

     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to 
                         recreational vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

  Mr. Taylor (for himself and Mrs. Miller of Michigan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to 
                         recreational vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recreational Boating Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    (a) Pollutant.--Section 502(6) of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362(6)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or (B)'' and inserting ``(B)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``; or (C) any deck runoff from a recreational 
        vessel, any engine cooling water, gray water, bilge water 
        effluent from properly functioning recreational marine engines, 
        laundry, shower, and galley sink wastes from a recreational 
        vessel, or any other discharge incidental to the normal 
        operation of a recreational vessel; except that this 
        subparagraph does not apply to rubbish, trash, garbage, or 
        other such materials discharged overboard by a recreational 
        vessel''.
    (b) Recreational Vessel.--Such section is further amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``(25) `recreational vessel' means a vessel--
                    ``(A) manufactured for operation, or operated, 
                primarily for recreational purposes; or
                    ``(B) leased, rented, or chartered to an individual 
                for recreational purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 34/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.034.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 558 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.034.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 34

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 558 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2012/C 034/01 | Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on net neutrality, traffic management and the protection of privacy and personal data | 1 |
| 2012/C 034/02 | Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on migration | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

European Data Protection Supervisor

2012/C 034/01

Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on net neutrality, traffic management and the protection of privacy and personal data

1

2012/C 034/02

Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on migration

18

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 034/03 | Euro exchange rates | 27 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 034/03

Euro exchange rates

27

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 034/04 | Notice for the attention of Monir Chouka, Yassin Chouka and Mevlüt Kar who were added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network, by virtue of Commission Regulation (EU) No 97/2012 | 28 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2012/C 034/04

Notice for the attention of Monir Chouka, Yassin Chouka and Mevlüt Kar who were added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network, by virtue of Commission Regulation (EU) No 97/2012

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### MITCHELL V. THE STATE.

(Decided April 11, 1912.)

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Edward F. Leber et al., Respondents, *v.*Campbell Stores, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1900.)

1. Appellate Term — Cannot consider weight of evidence, nor reverse for excessive damages.

The Appellate Term cannot, when determining an appeal from a judgment rendered on a verdict, consider the weight of evidence; nor reverse for excessive damages if there is any evidence to support the verdict.

*2.*Motion to dismiss — Waiver of denial. «

An exception to a denial of a motion to dismiss the complaint is waived if the defendant introduces testimony after such denial.

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial, and from a judgment of affirmance entered thereon.

Hyde & Leonard (William D. Leonard, of counsel), for appellant.

Maurice J. Katz (Herbert R. Limburger and Henry L. Scheuerman, of counsel), for respondents.

*jPer Ouria/ni.*

It has frequently been held that, in determining an appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury, this court cannot consider the weight of the evidence. Meyers v. Cohen, 4 Misc. Rep. 185; Borgan v. Wright, 22 id. 94, and cases there cited. Nor can this court reverse such a judgment on the ground that the damages are excessive, if there is any evidence to sustain the verdict. This leaves us simply to determine the validity of the exceptions taken by the appellant on the trial. The defendant, by introducing testimony after the denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint, made when plaintiffs rested,-waived his exception to the ruling, and the motion to dismiss must be considered upon all the evidence in the case. Hopkins v. Clark, 158 N. Y. 299; Jones v. Union R. Co., 18 App. Div. 267.

*475The case contains testimony tending to show that the defendant negligently allowed certain property, belonging to the plaintiffs, to become damaged while in the defendant’s possession. If any property was damaged to any extent under such circumstances, the motion to dismiss was rightly denied. As has been shown, we cannot consider whether the verdict was against the weight of evidence, or whether the damages were excessive.

The exceptions to the evidence were not well taken; in fact they were not discussed by the appellant on the brief.

Judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugko, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 501
Editorial Note: At 78 FR 4766, Jan. 23, 2013, parts 500-599 were transferred from Title 37, Chapter V, to Title 37, Chapter IV. Chapter V was removed and reserved.

§ 501.3 Definitions. ( a ) The term *Secretary,* as used in this part, means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
( b ) The term *Government agency*, as used in this part, means any Executive department or independent establishment of the Executive branch of the Government (including any independent regulatory commission or board, any corporation wholly owned by the United States, and the Smithsonian Institution), but does not include the Department of Energy for inventions made under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 2182, the Tennessee Valley Authority, or the Postal Service.
( c ) The term *Government employee*, as used in this part, means any officer or employee, civilian or military, of any Government agency, including any special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202 or an individual working for a Federal agency pursuant to the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA), 5 U.S.C. 1304 and 3371-3376, or a part-time consultant or part-time employee as defined in 29 U.S.C. 2101(a)(8) except as may otherwise be provided by agency regulation approved by the Secretary.
( d ) The term *invention*, as used in this part, means any art or process, machine, manufacture, design, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States.
( e ) The term *made* as used in this part in relation to any invention, means the conception or first actual reduction to practice of such invention as stated in *In re King*, 3 USPQ2d (BNA) 1747 (Comm'r Pat. 1987).
[61 FR 40999, Aug. 7, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 4766, Jan. 23, 2013]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Silver Spike Investment
Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:



1) the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2022
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the
year ended March 31, 2022 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 30, 2022 |  | By: | /s/ Scott Gordon                                         
|------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |     | Scott Gordon                                             
|                    |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 1075.101 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: *Bureau* means the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
*Bureau enforcement action* means any judicial or administrative action or proceeding in which the Bureau has obtained relief with respect to a violation.
*Chief Financial Officer* means the Chief Financial Officer of the Bureau or any Bureau employee to whom that officer has delegated authority to act under this part. In the absence of a Chief Financial Officer of the Bureau, the Director shall designate an alternative official of the Bureau to perform the functions of the Chief Financial Officer under this part.
*Civil Penalty Fund* means the Consumer Financial Civil Penalty Fund established by 12 U.S.C. 5497(d).
*Civil Penalty Fund Governance Board* means the body, comprised of senior Bureau officials, established by the Director of the Bureau to advise on matters relating to the Civil Penalty Fund.
*Class of victims* means a group of similarly situated victims who suffered harm from the same or similar violations for which the Bureau obtained relief in a Bureau enforcement action.
*Defendant* means a party in a Bureau enforcement action that is found or alleged to have committed a violation.
*Final order* means a consent order or settlement issued by a court or by the Bureau, or an appealable order issued by a court or by the Bureau as to which the time for filing an appeal has expired and no appeals are pending. For purposes of this definition, “appeals” include petitions for reconsideration, review, rehearing, and certiorari.
*Person* means an individual, partnership, company, corporation, association (incorporated or unincorporated), trust, estate, cooperative organization, or other entity.
*Redress* means any amounts—including but not limited to restitution, refunds, and damages—that a final order requires a defendant: ( 1 ) To distribute, credit, or otherwise pay to those harmed by a violation; or
( 2 ) To pay to the Bureau or another intermediary for distribution to those harmed by the violation.
*Victim* means a person harmed as a result of a violation.
*Violation* means any act or omission that constitutes a violation of law for which the Bureau is authorized to obtain relief pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5565(a).