alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward Smith, and others, *against*Alexander M’Donald.

on certiorari.

*L. Q. 0. ELMER*for plaintiff.

Two defendants, and service of summons on one only, (a)

(a)

*Ford vs. Munson, ante 93.*

Opinion of the Court.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

In this case the summons was returned, served on *Wood*only, without taking notice of either *Smith*or *Lee. Lucius Elmer,*esq. one of the attorn ies of this court, at the return of the summons, appeared for *Smith*and *Wood,*but not for *Lee,*and objected against the justice proceeding in the cause, because *Lee*had not been summoned also.' The justice, notwithstanding, proceeded, and a verdict was found and a judgement rendered against all the defendants for 75 dollars, and *Lee*now comes in to be relieved.

This entering of judgment against an absent defendant, who has not been summoned, and who, for aught that appears, is within the reach of process, has always been hoi don to be error. The question has been looked into again this term, in the case of *Ford*and others against *Munson,*and may be considered as finally settled.

Let the judgment be reversed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2550 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to recreational 

vessels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself and Mrs. MILLER of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating 

to recreational vessels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recreational Boating 

5 Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 (a) POLLUTANT.—Section 502(6) of the Federal 

8 Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362(6)) is 

9 amended— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2550 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘(B)’’; 

2 and 

3 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

4 following: ‘‘; or (C) any deck runoff from a rec5 reational vessel, any engine cooling water, gray 

6 water, bilge water effluent from properly functioning 

7 recreational marine engines, laundry, shower, and 

8 galley sink wastes from a recreational vessel, or any 

9 other discharge incidental to the normal operation of 

10 a recreational vessel; except that this subparagraph 

11 does not apply to rubbish, trash, garbage, or other 

12 such materials discharged overboard by a rec13 reational vessel’’. 

14 (b) RECREATIONAL VESSEL.—Such section is further 

15 amended by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(25) ‘recreational vessel’ means a vessel— 

17 ‘‘(A) manufactured for operation, or oper18 ated, primarily for recreational purposes; or 

19 ‘‘(B) leased, rented, or chartered to an in20 dividual for recreational purposes.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.1001 Hospitalized competent veterans. The provisions of this section apply only to the payment of amounts actually withheld on a running award under § 3.551(b) which are payable in a lump sum after the veteran's death. ( a ) *Basic entitlement.* Where an award of disability pension for a competent veteran without dependents was reduced because of hospital treatment or institutional or domiciliary care by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the veteran dies while receiving such treatment or care or before payment of amounts withheld, the lump sum is payable to the living person first listed as follows: ( 1 ) The veteran's spouse, as defined in § 3.1000(d)(1);
( 2 ) The veteran's children (in equal shares), as defined in § 3.57 but without regard to their age or marital status;
( 3 ) The veteran's dependent parents (in equal shares), or the surviving dependent parent, as defined in § 3.1000(d)(3);
( 4 ) In all other cases, only so much of the lump sum may be paid as may be necessary to reimburse a person who bore the expenses of last sickness or burial. (See § 3.1002.)
( b ) *Claim.* Applications must be filed with the Department of Veterans Affairs within 5 years after the death of the veteran. If, however, any person otherwise entitled is under legal disability at the time of the veteran's death, the 5-year period will run from the date of termination or removal of the legal disability. ( 1 ) There is no time limit on the retroactive period of an award or for furnishing evidence.
( 2 ) Failure to file timely claim, or a waiver of rights, by a preferred dependent will not serve to vest title in a person in a lower class or a claimant for reimbursement; neither will such failure or waiver by a person or persons in a joint class serve to increase the amount payable to another or others in the class.
( c ) *Lump sum withheld after discharge from institution.* The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will apply in the event of the death of any veteran prior to receiving a lump sum which was withheld because treatment or care was terminated against medical advice or as the result of disciplinary action.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5503)
[26 FR 1609, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 27 FR 5539, June 12, 1962; 27 FR 8177, Aug. 16, 1962; 27 FR 11893, Dec. 1, 1962; 39 FR 15126, May 1, 1974]
# Official Journal C 8/9 Ja

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 8 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 629 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 8

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 629 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2019/C 8/01 | Decision | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2019/C 8/01

Decision

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

| 9.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

DECISION

(2019/C 8/01)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended in particular by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended in particular by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE),

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the expiry, on 31 December 2018, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:
  AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the expiry, on 31 December 2018, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 24 October 2018, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 24 October 2018,

HAS DECIDED

Sole Article

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

AD/1/13, AST/4/11, AST/1/13, PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S,

shall be extended until 31 December 2019.

Luxembourg, 30 November 2018.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

2

---
Exhibit 102


		
			Amendment 2 to Commercial Building Lease
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			This Agreement made this _9th__ day of ___February_______, 2015 by and between Potawatomi Properties, LLC, hereinafter referred to as “Lessor”, and Wageworks, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Tenant”.
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Lessor and Tenant have entered into a Commercial Building Lease for 10375 North Baldev Court, Mequon, Wisconsin 53092.
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of amending said Commercial Building Lease.
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties intending to be legally bound do hereby agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			The provisions of Paragraph #29 are deleted in their entirety, and the following new Paragraph #29 is inserted:
		

		
			 
		

		
			29.  OPTION OF TENANT TO RENEW LEASE.  The Tenant will renew the Commercial Building Lease for a period of five (5) years under the same terms and conditions of the current lease.  The Tenant may terminate the lease and vacate the building without penalty, at any time on or after August 31, 2016, provided that the Tenant has given the Lessor nine (9) months’ prior notice of termination (e.g., if Tenant elects to terminate the Commercial Building Lease and vacate the building on August 31, 2016, then the Tenant shall provide Lessor with notice no later than November 30, 2015).  The Tenant shall only be liable for amounts due under the Commercial Building Lease up through the date of termination.     
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor and Tenant hove both duly executed this Amendment #2 to the Commercial Building Lease, all being done on the day and year first above written.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			POTAWATOMI PROPERTIES, LLCWAGEWORKS, INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: __________________________By: ___________________________
		

		
			       Marilyn Beem, ManagerEdgar Montes, COO
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2546 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2546

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
   Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Charles George Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CHARLES GEORGE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
located at 1100 Tunnel Road, Asheville, North Carolina, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Charles George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Charles George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2546

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
   Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Charles George Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
```
Study of

Children's Activity Patterns

•

Gf

~l{')O

vJ<-))

1ttql

CONTRACT NO. A733-149

FINAL REPORT

SEPTEMBER 1991
§ 21.326 Authorization of employment services. ( a ) *General.* Authorization of employment services shall be based upon the services identified and goals established in an IEAP (Individualized Employment Assistance Plan) under provisions of § 21.88. The effective dates for the commencement, or termination of such services will be determined under this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3117(a))
( b ) *Commencing date.* The commencing date authorizing a period of employment services will be the later of: ( 1 ) The date following completion of the period of rehabilitation to the point of employability; or
( 2 ) The date of the original IEAP. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107, 3117(a))
( c ) *Termination of the authorization of employment services.* Authorization for employment services will be terminated the earliest of: ( 1 ) The last day employment services are provided under the terms of an IEAP when employment services are interrupted, discontinued, or the veteran is rehabilitated;
( 2 ) The date the authorization is found to be erroneous because of an act of omission or commission by the veteran, or with his or her knowledge;
( 3 ) The last day of the month in which severance of service connection becomes final;
( 4 ) The day proceding the date of a fraudulent act;
( 5 ) The date preceding the commission of a treasonable or subversive act for which the veteran is convicted.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108, 5113)
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly Report of Radva Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:       November 11, 2004

                                               /s/ Luther I. Dickens
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Luther I. Dickens
                                               Chief Executive Officer



Date:       November 11, 2004

                                               /s/ William F. Fry
                                               --------------------------------
                                               William F. Fry
                                               Vice President-
                                               Chief Financial Officer




                                     - 12 -
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 249 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To restore the prohibition on the commercial sale and 

slaughter of wild free-roaming horses and burros. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 249 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SALE OF WILD FREE-ROAMING HORSES AND 

2 BURROS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(d)(5) of Public Law 

4 92–195 (16 U.S.C. 1333(d)(5)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking the period and inserting the fol6 lowing: ‘‘Provided, That no wild free-roaming horse 

7 or burro or its remains may be sold or transferred 

8 for consideration for processing into commercial 

9 products.’’; and 

10 (2) by striking subsection (e). 

11 (b) CRIMINAL PROVISIONS.—Section (8)(a)(4) of 

12 Public Law 92–195 (16 U.S.C. 1338(a)(4)) is amended 

13 by striking ‘‘except as provided in section 3(e),’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### Michael Takasch *v.*Anna Frederico

Maltbie, C. J., Bkown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued October 4

decided November 15, 1949.

*John B. Dillon,*for the appellant (plaintiff in error).

*Sydney P. Simons,*with whom, on the brief, was *Henry Greenstein,*for the appellee (defendant in error).

Maltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant upon a writ of error in a summary process proceeding tried before a justice of the peace. The claims of error stated in the writ include a group in which complaint is made that during the examination of some of the witnesses the justice permitted counsel for the defendant to make adverse comments as regards the plaintiff’s attorney and that the justice *186himself made such comments; certain rulings upon evidence; a ruling giving the defendant’s counsel the right to challenge two jurors; and a refusal to submit an interrogatory to the jury. The first group of claimed errors could be reviewed by the trial court only if the comments and rulings were properly presented to it;, the allowance of two challenges to the jury could be presented only if the fact of such a ruling was properly before the court; and a review of the refusal of the request to submit an interrogatory would require not only a finding that it was made but also sufficient facts upon which to determine the correctness of the ruling. The only way in which these claims of error could properly be brought before the trial court was by a bill of exceptions allowed and signed by the justice. *Putterman*v. *Miller,*133 Conn. 70, 72, 48 A. 2d 235; *Gaudio*v. *Olderman,*108 Conn. 143, 144, 142 A. 677; 1 Swift’s Digest 771; 2 id. 643. Only in that way could an authoritative statement of the rulings and the facts necessary for their review be put into the record. The record before us contains no bill of exceptions. There appears a brief statement of certain facts the parties offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved which was signed by the justice but which was wholly insufficient to afford a basis for reviewing the claimed errors. There also appears a statement in support of the first group of errors claimed, but it is signed only by counsel. It was offered at the trial in the Court of Common Pleas but was properly excluded because it was not a part of any bill of exceptions and was not in any way authenticated by. the justice. In the absence of a proper bill of exceptions, this court cannot review the errors claimed in the writ.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
y,\. rs •*<• u> 36- M. [7)£P/Co -rfanjOS BhlcjLtlov ^ favavgav fey*^F.5~3 £//v#r 

### *9ifVSL /?/#. 3sv \Soa/& cg^S CHI» 

### Uuugs&nti'rf: V7SS( mM AbQi'Acc^Mv&fcz&^j&kDbW(2W/^ .,'; A^'vJA ' ;\«
afi-gkL Zt'Ffk £d/M^/S&3&$/skic{ 't&Je^'*'} 

### fa ni^^^Mp^A^ feVfiPFtorfif ^Jm^dJL
Suh: 93, /, fa/JOm/a fa&Lffli>3£fl& 

## on fiSeparn/hL 4hm &r•^aM^Jg/^P
MuLmk &rJ2adduQ^e^ %£ma^ 

### (Mi^Jo^^^ &<um^ AJFane you*.

### L/&u {* kAfr&9b&h.Q 3?M hmz) f)#zj/te JxdzdJAtdzi &?/s6Fl4*)./3Z?<?37^. /fv/&/&?7 fc/3-faM &&K6/2BX) Ad-Afe /&3/ldf?/^^<&^ pXZ. m?XU. tjv/Af <?t?rr£A) m?rtJ#f AJ&Cd ClDpfrT^J^,^-^

fatted! ^ZtAjm 7&MJfty c*****/. ^/^6/tzfo7m 

### ^MJMu4iayiaJ>P/^ &?./&£&*$ ^ &*<*& && 3 S^f/J }d&4rtBNhfL 

## Piled ft 27.,gy zhfe^ M*J ^tyhe&Q 1)rkU^^ SkdLea* And ,<&>. lAJhp. -Me DtpheM/7<j^Jpa^ #>?&&

I^jLw^ fy&M£M<>h^\ iS^ 7s€:<2f2<Z 

## *&• (^jfl^oQ^uj^
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00826

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.N.J., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01058 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to Feb ruary 13, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said court on this 13th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 1212.1 Purpose and scope.

This subpart sets forth a one-year post-employment restriction applicable to senior examiners of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). This restriction is in addition to the post-employment restriction applicable to employees of FHFA under 12 U.S.C. 4523.
. 

, 

535 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

&morrblr YItir0.n KOon COomirOi0a.r 

Burrru of Labor StrtlrtLr 

Aurtln, Teur 

ClQlnioa il.. O-7337 

rim6 wum but ir not 

1 1 . l + 
.536 

. 

l a @ & 

' 

raw Aakln rppllralu tor aa om lop 

runt or t or agob A eenn an& hton 8uoh 

18 irrwa 

l 2004 an I 

rlull yto in, tUo rl8h the Comd!!:~: 

ruttlelmt boa4 ououto4 PI tho rgqllsrnt 

with 004 uid 8attl,loo$ l uraa# & tha p.naA mua ot 

llro I hoPun D.Uarr (##,W) OyobU to the Stat. 

.a.!, oounu b d&L Ua wont lntonbr 

&rid boa2 rlrrll be aoa2ltlono~ @hat tho 

a rot rloIat0 any or aho 4otloI, t;omB, 

an4 that tho 

rlu AOt Mko 

aBy ptwn 

l A4 prrooa .laJuro(. or rgylorod bg say rotlon 

l oaduot frW npnnnt4tloa or fati rktombnt 0) 

4rq wel: uplo~nt 4go t, us mb-uuto O? xoprrauit~tlror nay bria& J t tor trma6.a n&art Ouoh 

ttonon to th a lxtont et tlttr ( 50) 

r 

r rrnt of the 

pnal WA ABWP thrnln, tbo Cmd80 onar KAY, by a 

notior b rritlw, 4rlernd tha rxmoutlon or l now bond, 

r~~irh it not l xeoutrd l b rubdttrd to the Cocsdariorier 

within tsonty (20) brrr for h l¶ l pproral, raoh falluro 

to rxeoutr a nor bon4 nhall iprO Sroto forhit end 

08~001 tL0 1iOWM i88UOd t0 thB prinOip&l ESZ6d b 

raid bond.. 

Art. i&k of V. -, ;. ad, I 
537 

tb lnonrro ot rll lrndr U&w roguirod, aha Al br 

7ko oktut) aow fUblA8 8 wLlo'8 beoomln&i rontr 

oa rw bwk@ or l bl~atlen et uetbr without tho join4U Or hU $iw?bdm th@ 8~ l 8 it &@a im U808 Oi 

proAl 

'I; 

rlthoP8 auek jolAdor ku rot doa@ 

not blah 8rl ba; rlth it rbr wy kroev l rutat cm 

any bond or tmbrtrklng 04 uiothw, whothor the 6a.m 

be ottioirl Or trrdl?lawl, rxorpt rhrrr torblddrn bl 

WCS other otatuta, rnd rhe and hrr property u-m bowl.” 

Pour flrrt qucrtion la therefore amwered ln tr.8 recetirri 

s.5~ four rrroond qucitiac ir mdwrrd in the 8wmtlve. 

Your rrn truly,
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.104 Special procedure: Medical records. ( a ) *Statement of physician or mental health professional.* When an individual requests access to records pertaining to the individual that include medical and/or psychological information, the ASC, if it deems it necessary under the particular circumstances, may require the individual to submit with the request a signed statement by the individual's physician or a mental health professional indicating that, in his or her opinion, disclosure of the requested records or information directly to the individual will not have an adverse effect on the individual.
( b ) *Designation of physician or mental health professional to receive records.* If the ASC believes, in good faith, that disclosure of medical and/or psychological information, directly to an individual could have an adverse effect on that individual, the individual may be asked to designate in writing a physician or mental health professional to whom the individual would like the records to be disclosed, and disclosure that otherwise would be made to the individual will instead be made to the designated physician or mental health professional.