alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 45.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
# CE2004084EN.01009701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/97

---

(2004/C 84 E/0126)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3779/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the municipality of Terni under the action programme to promote civil protection

Subject:

In reply to my earlier question E-1103/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Terni had submitted projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

1

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome was?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25370]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

[Docket No. 2012-10]

Extension of Comment Period: Resale Royalty Right

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is extending the period of public comment 
in response to its September 19, 2012 Notice of Inquiry requesting 
comments regarding issues relating to consideration of a federal resale 
royalty right.

DATES: Comments are due December 5, 2012.

ADDRESSES: All comments and reply comments shall be submitted 
electronically. A comment page containing a comment form is posted on 
the Office Web site at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/resaleroyalty. The 
Web site interface requires commenting parties to complete a form 
specifying name and organization, as applicable, and to upload comments 
as an attachment via a browser button. To meet accessibility standards, 
commenting parties must upload comments in a single file not to exceed 
six megabytes (MB) in one of the following formats: the Adobe Portable 
Document File (PDF) format that contains searchable, accessible text 
(not an image); Microsoft Word; WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or 
ASCII text file format (not a scanned document). The form and face of 
the comments must include both the name of the submitter and 
organization. The Office will post the comments publicly on the 
Office's Web site exactly as they are received, along with names and 
organizations. If electronic submission of comments is not feasible, 
please contact the Office at 202-707-8350 for special instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Okai, Counsel, Office of Policy 
and International Affairs, by email at jokai@loc.gov or by telephone at 
202-707-9444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 19, 2012, the Copyright Office 
published a Notice of Inquiry inviting public comments on consideration 
of a federal resale royalty right. Due to the number and complexity of 
the issues raised in that Notice, it appears that some stakeholders may 
need additional time to respond. In order to facilitate full and 
adequate public comment, the Office hereby extends the time for filing 
additional comments to December 5, 2012.

    Dated: October 10, 2012.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2012-25370 Filed 10-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
```
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Djibouti

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Djibouti			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Djibouti 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Djibouti

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing the enacted budget and end-of-year report within a reasonable period.  It did not publish the executive budget proposal within a reasonable period.  The government published online sufficient information on debt obligations.  Public budget documents did not provide a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams.  While financial allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises were included in public budget documents, the figures were outdated.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and published an audit report within a reasonable period.

Djibouti’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period; and
- Providing a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams in its budget documents, including up-to-date allocations to, earnings from, and debt holdings of state-owned enterprises.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Djibouti 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentDjibouti

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7540

LARRY NORMAN GAMBRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden of Perry Correctional

Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney

General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-00-593-23-9)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Norman Gambrell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Norman Gambrell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal

was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March

29, 2001. The notice of appeal was filed on October 7, 2002.

Because Gambrell failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### 9. **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  7/9/10 --- **Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer**  7/9/10 --- **Airc raft Owners & Pilots Association**  **Robert Hackman** 7/9/10 --- **ATA M Lopez**  7/9/10 ---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Saudi Arabia

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Saudi Arabia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period and made its enacted budget and end-of-year report publicly available online within a reasonable period.Information on debt obligations, including for state-owned enterprises, was publicly available online.The limited data available in the government’s annual budget statement broke down expenditures by category, but not by ministry or agency.The annual budget statement did not show allocations to the royal family and the government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to public oversight.Military and intelligence budgets were not subject to oversight by the Saudi legislative Majlis or a civilian public body.When actual revenues and expenditures did not reasonably correspond to those in the enacted budget, the government produced and publicly issued revised budget estimates.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and followed up on its findings, but its reports were not publicly available.The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not consistently made publicly available.The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework and disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

Saudi Arabia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Breaking down budget expenditures by ministry or government agency and by support to executive offices;
-  Eliminating off-budget accounts or subjecting them to adequate oversight and audit;
-  Subjecting military and intelligence budgets to legislative or civilian public oversight;
-  Making audit reports of the government’s executed budget widely and easily accessible to the public within a reasonable period; and
-  Making basic information on natural resource awards consistently available to the public.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSaudi Arabia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 32(b)


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the IGENE Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March  31,  2006
as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I,  Edward  J.  Weisberger, Chief Financial Officer of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best  of
my knowledge:

          (1).  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
          1934, as amended; and

          (2).   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 19, 2006                By: /S/ EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
      ____________                    _______________________________
                                          EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                          Chief Financial Officer


A  signed original of this written statement required by Section  906
has  been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Tam Cheuk Ho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Tam Cheuk Ho



Tam Cheuk Ho

Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,545
<INVENTORY>                                        330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,845
<PP&E>                                          50,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         86
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,858
<SALES>                                         11,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,639
<CGS>                                            3,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,159<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,127)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,127)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,127)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES A $4.8 MILLION CHARGE FOR RESTRUCTURING OF THE COMPANY'S WORLDWIDE
OPERATIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2546 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center in Asheville, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Charles 

George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2546 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CHARLES GEORGE DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CEN3 TER. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af5 fairs Medical Center located at 1100 Tunnel Road, Ashe6 ville, North Carolina, shall after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Charles 

8 George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

11 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

12 shall be considered to be a reference to the Charles George 

13 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2546 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs 

fairs Medical Center’’. the ‘‘Charles George Department of Veterans AfMedical Center in Asheville, North Carolina, as
October 7, 2004

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Plantex USA, Inc.

Gentlemen:

	This is to confirm that the date of  ******** shall, and hereby is, inserted in lieu of the date of  ********" in Section 2 c. of the September 24, 2004 Amendment Number One to the Selective Waiver Agreement dated April 26, 2004 and the Amended and Restated Supply Agreement dated April 26, 2004.

	This letter shall be effective as of the date hereof and, except as set forth herein, the Selective Waiver Agreement, Amended and Restated Supply Agreement and Amendment Number One thereto shall remain in full force and effect and shall be other wise unaffected.  This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

	Please indicate your agreement to the contents of this letter by signing a counterpart of this letter as indicated below.

 

Very truly yours, 
ALPHARMA INC.
By /s/ Robert F. Wrobel 
PUREPAC PHARMACEUTICAL CO.
AGREED:By /s/ Robert F. Wrobel

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL 
INDUSTRIES LTD
By /s/ Richard Egossi 
PLANTEX USA, INC.
By /s/ Richard Egossi
#### § 1011.5 Reimbursement.

If a purchaser exercises rights under 15 U.S.C. 1703(b), (c), or (d), but cannot reconvey the lot in substantially similar condition, the developer may subtract from the amount paid by the purchaser, and otherwise due to the purchaser under 15 U.S.C. 1703, any diminished value in the lot caused by the acts of the purchaser.
ERROR.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

November Term, 1890.]

Cox, Shauck and Swing, JJ.

(Judge Shauck, of the Second Circuit, taking the place of Judge Smith.)

#### JOHN HAUFF v. CINCINNATI, HAMILTON & DAYTON RD. CO.

Granting Motion for New Trian for Excessive Verdtct not a Finan Order.

The granting of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the judgment is excessive, is not such a final order as entitles the party recovering the verdict to go up on error.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

SWING, J.

The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad Co. instituted proceedings in the probate court of Hamilton county to assess the value of land which it wanted *231to appropriate for railroad purposes. The jury fixed the value of the land at $8,250, which was $1,750 more than a jury had found the property to be worth at a previous trial. The verdicts were successively set aside on the ground that they were excessive, and to the action of the court as to the second verdict a petition in error was filed in the court of common pleas.

Davidson & Conway, for Hauff.

Ramsey, Maxwell & Ramsey, for the railroad company.

A motion by the railroad company to dismiss the petition, on the ground that the order of the probate court in setting aside the verdict for excessiveness and granting a new trial was not such a final order as to entitle a party to take the case up on error, was granted in the court of common pleas, and from that order the case was taken to the circuit court, where the action of the common pleas was affirmed.
§ 17.646 Obligated service. ( a ) *General provision.* A participant's obligated service will begin on the date on which the participant begins full-time, permanent employment with VA in the field of psychiatric medicine in a location determined by VA. Obligated service must be full-time, permanent employment and does not include any period of temporary or contractual employment.
( b ) *Duration of service.* The participant will agree in the acceptance of conditions to serve for an obligated service period of 2 or more calendar years.
( c ) *Location and position of obligated service.* VA reserves the right to make final decisions on the location and position of the obligated service.