alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers. 2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

§ 1.416 The United States International Preliminary Examining Authority. ( a ) Pursuant to appointment by the Assembly, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will act as an International Preliminary Examining Authority for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office and in other Receiving Offices as may be agreed upon by the Director, in accordance with agreement between the Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau.
( b ) The United States Patent and Trademark Office, when acting as an International Preliminary Examining Authority, will be identified by the full title “United States International Preliminary Examining Authority” or by the abbreviation “IPEA/US.”
( c ) The major functions of the International Preliminary Examining Authority include: ( 1 ) Receiving and checking for defects in the Demand;
( 2 ) Forwarding Demands in accordance with PCT Rule 59.3;
( 3 ) Collecting the handling fee for the International Bureau and the preliminary examination fee for the United States International Preliminary Examining Authority;
( 4 ) Informing applicant of receipt of the Demand;
( 5 ) Considering the matter of unity of invention;
( 6 ) Providing an international preliminary examination report which is a non-binding opinion on the questions of whether the claimed invention appears: to be novel, to involve an inventive step (to be nonobvious), and to be industrially applicable; and
( 7 ) Transmitting the international preliminary examination report to applicant and the International Bureau.
[52 FR 20047, May 28, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 29617, June 1, 1998]

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CMC
Securities Corporation I's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               32
<BONDS>                                        627,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                         (41)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,868
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,895
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 103I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 103I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 653 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 103I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 653 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 103 I/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/354, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/353 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| 2022/C 103 I/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 103 I/01

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/354, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/353 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

2022/C 103 I/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997, and 62 FR 45733, Sept. 9, 1997.

§ 9.12 Reinsurance formula. The allocation of insurance to the insurer and each reinsurer will be based upon the following: ( a ) An amount of the total life insurance in force under the policy in proportion to the company's total life insurance in force in the United States where: The first $100 million in force is counted in full, The second $100 million in force is counted at 75 percent, The third $100 million in force is counted at 50 percent, The fourth $100 million in force is counted at 25 percent, And any amount above $400 million in force is counted at 5 percent.
( b ) The allocation will be redetermined at the beginning of each policy year for the primary insurer and the companies then reinsuring, with the portion as set forth in paragraph (a) of this section based upon the corresponding in force (excluding the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance in force) as of the preceding December 31.
( c ) Any life insurance company, which is not initially participating in reinsurance or conversions, but satisfies the criteria set forth in § 9.11, may subsequently apply to the primary insurer to reinsure and convert, or to convert only. The participation of such company will be effective as of the beginning of the policy year following the date on which application is approved by the insurer.
[40 FR 4135, Jan. 28, 1975. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 20135, 20136, May 6, 1996]
#### § 1074.2 Purpose.

The Bureau issues regulations and guidance as part of its supervisory function. This subpart reiterates the distinctions between regulations and guidance, as stated in the Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance (appendix A to this part) (Statement), and provides that the Statement is binding on the Bureau.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
                              <S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                        305,529
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 131,932
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   808,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,457,736
<PP&E>                        312,755
<DEPRECIATION>                181,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,117,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         644,800
<BONDS>                       9,421,803
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         415,003
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      622,089
<OTHER-SE>                    (8,341,652)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2,117,243
<SALES>                       129,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              129,575
<CGS>                         198,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 415,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            169,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (652,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (652,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (652,186)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.01)


</TABLE>
§ 1239.20 Board of directors of the Enterprises. ( a ) *Membership* — ( 1 ) *Limits on service of board members.* — ( i ) *General requirement.* No board member of an Enterprise may serve on the board of directors for more than 10 years or past the age of 72, whichever comes first; provided, however, a board member may serve his or her full term if he or she has served less than 10 years or is 72 years on the date of his or her election or appointment to the board; and
( ii ) *Waiver.* Upon written request of an Enterprise, the Director may waive, in his or her sole discretion and for good cause, the limits on the service of a board member under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) *Independence of board members.* A majority of seated members of the board of directors of an Enterprise shall be independent board members, as defined under rules set forth by the NYSE, as amended from time to time.
( 3 ) *Segregation of duties.* The position of chairperson of the board of directors shall be filled by a person other than the chief executive officer, who shall also be a director of the Enterprise that is independent, as defined under the rules set forth by the NYSE, as amended from time to time.
( b ) *Meetings, quorum and proxies, information, and annual review* — ( 1 ) *Frequency of meetings.* The board of directors of an Enterprise shall meet at least eight times a year and no less than once a calendar quarter to carry out its obligations and duties under applicable laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines.
( 2 ) *Non-management board member meetings.* Non-management directors of an Enterprise shall meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management participation.
( 3 ) *Quorum of board of directors; proxies not permissible.* For the transaction of business, a quorum of the board of directors of an Enterprise is at least a majority of the seated board of directors and a board member may not vote by proxy.
( 4 ) *Information.* Management of an Enterprise shall provide a board member of the Enterprise with such adequate and appropriate information that a reasonable board member would find important to the fulfillment of his or her fiduciary duties and obligations.
( 5 ) *Annual review.* At least annually, the board of directors of an Enterprise shall be informed of significant changes to the requirements of laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines that are applicable to its activities and duties.
# IMMC.EESC-2023-02425-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2023-02425-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

| OPINION |
| --- |
| European Economic and Social Committee |
| Support of Ammunition Production |
| _____________ |
| Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Act in Support of Ammunition Production

  [COM(2023) 237final – 2023/0140 (COD)] |
| |
| INT/1036 |

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Support of Ammunition Production

_____________

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Act in Support of Ammunition Production

  [COM(2023) 237final – 2023/0140 (COD)]

INT/1036

EN

Referral

| Referral | Council of the European Union, 10/05/2023


  European Parliament, 08/05/2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Single Market, Production and Consumption |
| Adopted at plenary | 14/06/2023 |
| Plenary session No | 579 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 193/2/9 |

Referral

Council of the European Union, 10/05/2023

Council of the European Union, 10/05/2023

European Parliament, 08/05/2023

European Parliament, 08/05/2023

Legal basis

Legal basis

Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Single Market, Production and Consumption

Single Market, Production and Consumption

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

14/06/2023

14/06/2023

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

579

579

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

193/2/9

193/2/9

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 June 2023

Brussels, 14 June 2023

Oliver RÖPKE

Oliver RÖPKE

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
§ 1254.5 Solicitation of applications. ( a ) *Required solicitations.* FHFA periodically will require the Enterprises to solicit applications from credit score model developers. FHFA will determine whether a solicitation should be initiated. FHFA will establish the solicitation requirement by notice to the Enterprises, which will include: ( 1 ) The requirement to submit a Credit Score Solicitation to FHFA for review;
( 2 ) A deadline for submission of the Credit Score Solicitation; and
( 3 ) A timeframe for the solicitation period.
( b ) *Credit Score Solicitation.* In connection with each required solicitation, an Enterprise must submit to FHFA a Credit Score Solicitation including: ( 1 ) The opening and closing dates of the solicitation time period during which the Enterprise will accept applications from credit score model developers;
( 2 ) A description of the information that must be submitted with an application;
( 3 ) A description of the process by which the Enterprise will obtain data for the assessment of the credit score model;
( 4 ) A description of the process for the Credit Score Assessment and the Enterprise Business Assessment; and
( 5 ) Any other requirements as determined by the Enterprise.
( c ) *Review by FHFA.* Within 45 days of an Enterprise submission of its Credit Score Solicitation to FHFA, FHFA will either approve or disapprove the Enterprise's Credit Score Solicitation. FHFA may extend the time period for its review as needed. FHFA may impose such terms, conditions, or limitations on the approval of a Credit Score Solicitation as FHFA determines to be appropriate.
( d ) *Publication.* Upon approval by FHFA, the Enterprise must publish the Credit Score Solicitation on its website for at least 90 days prior to the start of the solicitation time period.
( e ) *Initial solicitation.* Each Enterprise must submit its initial Credit Score Solicitation to FHFA within 60 days of the effective date of this regulation. The initial solicitation time period will begin on a date determined by FHFA and will extend for 120 days.
§ 1240.30 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart sets forth methodologies for determining risk-weighted assets for purposes of the generally applicable risk-based capital requirements for the Enterprises.
( b ) This subpart is also applicable to covered positions, as defined in subpart F of this part.
Risk-Weighted Assets for General Credit Risk
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131395 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131395 COA: 260550 Wayne CC: 04-009630-01 ANTONIO CINQUE COCHRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SHANE HEIZMAN,

Petitioner

v.

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 1 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March

, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Mandamus and Extraordinary Relief

seeks extraordinary relief, it is DENIED.

To the extent the Petition for Mandamus and Extraordinary Relief asks that

adjudica tion of the pending PCRA petition be compelled, it is GRANTED. The Court of

Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to adjudicate the PCRA petition

within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its adjudication.

Jurisdiction is RETAINED.

T h e Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the

Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and the Commonwealth.
Order entered October 7, 2022

In the

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00511-CR

No. 05-21-00512-CR

No. 05-21-00513-CR

No. 05-21-00514-CR

OSCAR MALIK KING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-71539-M, F21-00153-M, F21-00154-M, 

F21-00155-M

ORDER

Before the Court are two pro se motions filed by Oscar Malik King: 

(1) Motion to Extend Time to File Brief 10.5(b); and (2) Motion to Suspend. Mr. 

King is represented by counsel in this appeal, however, and he is not entitled to 

hybrid representation. See In re Jackson, No. 05–02–00106–CV, 2002 WL 

172133, at *1 (Tex. App.–Dallas Feb. 5, 2002, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) 
(denying pro se petition for writ of mandamus where relator was represented by 

counsel in trial court); see also Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. 

App. [Panel Op.] 1981) (person represented by counsel is not entitled to hybrid 

representation). Accordingly, Mr. King may not file motions on his own behalf, 

and we DENY Mr. King’s pro se motions on that basis.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN P. STROH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 371 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# Official Journal C 308/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 308 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5924 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 308

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5924 August 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 308/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8114 — Cobepa/JF Hillebrand Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 308/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7854 — Agravis/Wilmar International/H Bögel) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 308/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8114 — Cobepa/JF Hillebrand Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 308/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7854 — Agravis/Wilmar International/H Bögel) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 308/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 308/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 308/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8104 — HNA Group/Gategroup) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 308/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8104 — HNA Group/Gategroup) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1209.37 Pre-hearing submissions. ( a ) *General.* Within the time set by the presiding officer, but in no case later than 10 days before the start of the hearing, each party shall serve on every other party the serving party's: ( 1 ) Pre-hearing statement;
( 2 ) Final list of witnesses to be called to testify at the hearing, including name and address of each witness, and a short summary of the expected testimony of each witness;
( 3 ) List of the exhibits to be introduced at the hearing along with a copy of each exhibit; and
( 4 ) Stipulations of fact, if any.
( b ) *Effect of failure to comply.* No witness may testify and no exhibit may be introduced at the hearing that is not listed in the pre-hearing submissions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, except for good cause shown.