alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, I, Gary L. Shell, Chief Financial Officer of Sharps Compliance Corp. (the "Company"), state and attest, to the best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
GARY L. SHELL

Gary
L. Shell
Vice President,
and Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Barings Private Credit Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Bock, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ JONATHAN BOCKJonathan BockCo-Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2022
42175.

#### LeCRAW v. L. P. D., INC.

Submitted July 8, 1966

Decided September 7, 1966.

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to reconsider a previous order of court overruling the defendant’s general and special demurrers to the plaintiff’s petition. *Held:*

The judgment appealed from in the notice of appeal filed by the appellant is neither a final judgment nor one which would have been final if rendered as contended by the appellant for the reason that if the trial court had granted the motion to reconsider, the status of the case in the court below would not have been changed in any way until a subsequent order was rendered after reconsideration vacating the original judgment and entering a countrary ruling. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from not being an appealable judgment under Sec. 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; *Code Ann.*§ 6-701) and no appeal having been taken from the previous judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s general demurrer to the petition, this court is without jurisdiction to review the enumeration of error, and the appeal must be dismissed as authorized by Sec. 13(b) of the Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29; *Code Ann.*§ 6-809). *Birdwell v. Pippen,*113 Ga. App. 202 (147 SE2d 673).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*282*Barber & Bambo, Olin Bambo,*for appellant.

*Bose & Silverman, George S. Stem,*for appellee.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2021-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.               Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.               Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

  

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 0

### CFR Correction

In Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 0 to 19, revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 93, in § 0.607, reinstate paragraph (d) to read as follows:

§ 0.607

* * * * *

(d) The Commissioner presiding at the meeting will prepare a statement setting out the time and place of the meeting, the names of persons other than Commission personnel who were present at the meeting, and the names of Commission personnel who participated in the discussion. These statements will be retained in a public file in the Minute and Rules Branch, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-23479 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 4.105


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. : GONGJIEDAIZIDI2014062625


 


Borrower : Ganglian
Finance Leasing Co., Ltd


Lender : China
Minsheng Bank Shijiazhuang Branch


Signing Date
: June 26, 2014


Loan Amount
: RMB100,000,000


 


Length of maturity
: From June 26, 2014 to June 26, 2015


Use of Loan
: Vehicle Purchase


Loan Interest : 7.80%


Debt Note:    Debt
note is one of the part of the contract, not specified in the contract or records do not match the loan amount, date of draft,
repayment date stated on the debt note, the loan documents shall prevail.


There are three
Debt Note of the contract:


 


		4.	Date of Draft : June 26, 2014



Draft Amount: RMB100,000,000


 


Date of Draft
: June 26, 2014


Withdrawal Amount
: RMB100,000,000


Payment Method : The interest should be repaid by monthly. The principal
shall be fully repaid at the maturity date of the loan.


Repayment Date
: June 26, 2015


 


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Guarantee, Guaranty
of Mortgage


 


- Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trading Group Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum
Mortgage Contract with the lender, with the contract no.GONGGAOBAOZIDI2014061805.


 


- Hebei Ruiliang Trading Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum Pledge
Contract with the lender, with the contract no.GONGGAODIZIDI2014061805.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [STB Ex Parte No. 646 (Sub-No. 2)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Surface Transportation Board published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 30, 2009, which directed the Association of American Railroads, and permitted other parties, to file supplemental evidence so that the Board has a full record on which to base its methodology to calculate a railroad-specific average state tax rate for use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method. The published document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Timothy J. Strafford, (202) 245-0356.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 30, 2009, in FR Doc. 09-02056, on page 5727, in the third column, correct, “Decided: January 23, 2008,” to read, “Decided: January 23, 2009.” All other information remains unchanged.                    

Dated: January 30, 2009.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. E9-2357 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### ALCO PRODUCTS, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, v. EAZOR EXPRESS, INC., a Corporation.

No. 14085.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 11, 1963.

Decided May 15, 1963.

*28Hamilton A. Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (D. H. Trushel, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph F. Weis, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Weis & Weis, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for negligent injury to property the court below granted a motion to dismiss at the end of the plaintiff’s case, ruling that there was no evidence on which the jury could properly find that the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the damage suffered by the plaintiff. The defendant’s alleged negligence occurred when its driver, making a delivery at plaintiff’s plant, drove a truck against a valve, a unit of pipe which carried water to the interior sprinkler system of plaintiff’s building. This accident occurred during the morning of February 18th and rendered the sprinkler system temporarily inoperative. The plaintiff promptly undertook to repair the valve but did not complete the job that day. About eleven o’clock that night a fire broke out in the building and destroyed it. This suit is for that loss, it being the plaintiff’s theory that, had the sprinkler system not been rendered inoperative, the fire would have been controlled and damage would have been small.

There was no proof of the origin or nature of the fire. There was no proof of the potential effectiveness of the sprinkler system, either generally or in relation to the fire in question. It did appear that the sprinkler system was more than forty years old. There was no proof of its actual operation other than the discharge of water from one sprinkler head in 1924. In these circumstances, any conclusion that, but for the break caused by the defendant, the sprinkler system would in fact have controlled the fire could have been based only upon unwarranted speculation. Therefore, the ruling that, on the question of causation, the plaintiff had not established a sufficient case for submission to the jury must be sustained.

The judgment will be affirmed.
# Official Journal C 257A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.257.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 257A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 541 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.257.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 257A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 541 September 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 257A/01 | Vacancy for the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (Grade AD 14) — COM/2011/10316 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2011/C 257A/01

Vacancy for the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (Grade AD 14) — COM/2011/10316

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (BG/RO) |
| 181 | (DA) |
| 183 | (SL) |
| 185 | |
| 193 | (BG/RO) |
| 198 | (CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK) |
| 206 | (CS/ES/LV/MT/SV) |
| 208 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 221 | |
| 222 | (BG/RO) |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 257 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(BG/RO)

181

(DA)

183

(SL)

185

193

(BG/RO)

198

(CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK)

206

(CS/ES/LV/MT/SV)

208

(DE/EN/FR)

221

222

(BG/RO)

223

229

257

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofMay 26, 2021, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period thatis the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
****SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.****By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: 
/s/ Erik Laney
Name: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
Exhibit 8.1

 

|                                                                     |                          |                  |                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------|-------------------|
|                                                                |                     |             | % equity interest |
| Name                                                                | Country of Incorporation | Type of Control  | 2021              |
| Nuova Ompi S.r.l.                                                   | Italy                    | Direct           | 100%              |
| Spami S.r.l.                                                        | Italy                    | Direct           | 100%              |
| Stevanato Group International a.s.                                  | Slovakia                 | Direct           | 100%              |
| Medical Glass a.s.                                                  | Slovakia                 | Indirect         | 99.7%             |
| Stevanato Group N.A. S. de RL de CV                                 | Mexico                   | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Ompi N.A. S. de RL de CV                                            | Mexico                   | Direct

Indirect | 30.76%

69.24%    |
| Ompi of America, Inc.                                               | USA                      | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Ompi do Brasil Industria e Comercio de Embalagens Farmaceutica Ltda | Brazil                   | Direct

Indirect | 79%

21%          |
| Ompi Pharma.Packing Techn. Co. Ltd                                  | China                    | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Innoscan A/S                                                        | Denmark                  | Indirect         | 100%              |
| SVM Automatik A/S                                                   | Denmark                  | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Medirio SA                                                          | Switzerland              | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Balda Medical Gmbh                                                  | Germany                  | Direct           | 100%              |
| Balda C. Brewer, Inc.                                               | USA                      | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Balda Precision, Inc.                                               | USA                      | Indirect         | 100%              |
| Ompi of Japan Co., Ltd.                                             | Japan                    | Direct           | 51%               |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<MULTIPLIER>	1
       
<S>			<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>	JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>	SEP-30-1997
<CASH>		304,581
<SECURITIES>	0
<RECEIVABLES>	14,494
<ALLOWANCES>	0
<INVENTORY>		0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	1,022,695
<PP&E>		208,842
<DEPRECIATION>	155,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	1,086,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	2,885,168
<BONDS>		1,500,000
<COMMON>		191,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	 493,186
<PREFERRED>		1,875
<OTHER-SE>		(3,985,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	1,086,339	
<SALES>		0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	0
<CGS>			0
<TOTAL-COSTS>	174,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	280,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	86,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>	(541,619)
<INCOME-TAX>	0	
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	(541,619)
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	0
<CHANGES>		0
<NET-INCOME>	(541,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>	(.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>	(.03)
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132942 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE PAIGE RENEE HANSON and 

JESSE LARS HANSON, Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a 

FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, 

Petitioner- Appellee, 

v SC: 132942 

 COA: 271110

 Oakland CC

 Family Division: 2004-694210-NA 

MARK HANSON,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0130 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 2, 2007 

Clerk
#### §§ 4.110-4.111 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CMC
SECURITIES CORPORATION I'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               53
<BONDS>                                        333,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                        (63)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,006
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>