alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 18b.1 Scope of rules.

The rules of procedure in this part supplement §§ 18.9 and 18.10 of this chapter and govern the practice for hearings, decisions, and administrative review conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (section 602, 78 Stat. 252) and part 18 of this chapter.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Parkway Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Flatt,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

|  | /s/ William R. Flatt    |
|--|-------------------------|
|  | William R. Flatt (*)    |
|  | Chief Financial Officer |
|  | August 4, 2006          |

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parkway Properties,Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
4.4


ALLONGE
(Extension) TO PROMISSORY NOTE


Dated
_____________________________________, 2013,


In
the original amount of $ _____________________________________ ,


Having
DynaResource, Inc. as Borrower and  _____________________________________as Lender 


(the
"Note")


1.     The provision of the Note entitled "Promise to Pay" is amended in its entirety, to read as follows:


PROMISE
TO PAY. DynaResource, Inc., office address in Irving Texas as set forth above ("Borrower")
hereby promises to pay to  ______________ ("LENDER") in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal
amount of ________________________________ ($______________), together with interest at the rate of 12.5% per annum
on the unpaid principal' balance from the date of the note until maturity.


The
loan will accrue interest for twelve months with the accrued interest added to principal. After the First Year, Interest will
be paid Quarterly, in arrears, with the first payment due in Month sixteen and continuing until maturity unless redeemed earlier.
Notwithstanding, the 2nd and 3"1- scheduled quarterly interest payments (quarter ended September 30,
2014 and December 31, 2014) will continue to accrue and be paid July 15, 2015.


		2.	    The
                                         provision of the Note entitled "Payment" is amended in its entirety, to read
                                         as follows:



 


PAYMENT,
Borrower will pay interest only, quarterly in arrears starting in month sixteen. Interest will accrue for fifteen months and
paid in month sixteen, and being paid quarterly in arrears thereafter and continuing until the note principal is paid in full.
The annual interest rate for this Note is computed on a simple interest basis at 12.5% per annum. Borrower will pay Lender at
Lender's address as shown on this loan document, or at such other place as Lender may designate in writing.


 


		3.	The
provision of the Note entitled "Maturity Date" is amended in its entirety, to read as follows:



 


 MATURITY DATE. December 31, 2016.


 


4.     
The provision of the Note entitled "Convertibility" is amended in its entirety, to read as follows:


CONVERTIBILITY.
The Lender may, at any time prior to maturity or prepayment, Convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest into common
stock of DynaResource, Inc. at the conversion price of $5.00 per share. Additionally, on conversion, lender would receive a Warrant
exercisable into the Company's common stock at $7.50, such warrant expiring on December 31, 2016.


In
addition, until March 31, 2015, the Lender may convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest into common stock at a conversion
price of $2.50 per share.


 


		5.	In
                                         all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain unchanged.



 


 


 





 


 


SIGNATURES:


 


 


 


BORROWER:


 


DynaResource,
Inc.


a
Delaware corporation 


  





		 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 By:	 	 
	 	 	K.D. DIEPHOLZ 	 
	 	 	Chairman/CEO	 






 


 


 


LENDER:


 


 





 





		 By:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 41.127 Judgment. ( a ) *Effect within Office* — ( 1 ) *Estoppel.* A judgment disposes of all issues that were, or by motion could have properly been, raised and decided. A losing party who could have properly moved for relief on an issue, but did not so move, may not take action in the Office after the judgment that is inconsistent with that party's failure to move, except that a losing party shall not be estopped with respect to any contested subject matter for which that party was awarded a favorable judgment.
( 2 ) *Final disposal of claim.* Adverse judgment against a claim is a final action of the Office requiring no further action by the Office to dispose of the claim permanently.
( b ) *Request for adverse judgment.* A party may at any time in the proceeding request judgment against itself. Actions construed to be a request for adverse judgment include: ( 1 ) Abandonment of an involved application such that the party no longer has an application or patent involved in the proceeding,
( 2 ) Cancellation or disclaiming of a claim such that the party no longer has a claim involved in the proceeding,
( 3 ) Concession of priority or unpatentability of the contested subject matter, and
( 4 ) Abandonment of the contest.
( c ) *Recommendation.* The judgment may include a recommendation for further action by the examiner or by the Director. If the Board recommends rejection of a claim of an involved application, the examiner must enter and maintain the recommended rejection unless an amendment or showing of facts not previously of record is filed which, in the opinion of the examiner, overcomes the recommended rejection.
( d ) *Rehearing.* A party dissatisfied with the judgment may file a request for rehearing within 30 days of the entry of the judgment. The request must specifically identify all matters the party believes to have been misapprehended or overlooked, and the place where the matter was previously addressed in a motion, opposition, or reply.
[69 FR 50003, Aug. 12, 2004, as amended at 69 FR 58260, Sept. 30, 2004]
#### State v. Lindsey

*[Cite as 6 AOA 279]*

*Case No. 1887*

*Medina County, (9th)*

*Decided August 15, 1990*

*Dean Holman, Prosecuting Attorney, 135 S. Jefferson St, Medina, Ohio 44256, for Plaintiff.*

*Thomas J. Dougan, Attorney at Law, 5 W. College St, Oberlin, Ohio 44074, for Defendant*

CIRIGLIANO, J.

Appellant Maurice Lindsay, appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of complicity to commit aggravated trafficking. We affirm. Assignment of Error

"I. The verdict herein is against the manifest weight of the evidence and contrary to law and the court erred in denying appellant's motion for acquittal under Rule 29 and instead this court instructed the jury regarding complicity under 2923.03 to the prejudice of appellant."

Lindsey contends that he was merely present when his companion sold cocaine to agent Pearlman of the Medina County Drug Enforcement Unit and that mere presence is insufficient to convict him of complicity. We agree that in *State v. Sims*(1983), 10 Ohio App. 3d 56, the court found that mere presence may be insufficient to establish complicity. The record before us establishes Lindsey was far more involved than being a "mere presence."

In a statement taken after his arrest and played for the jury, Lindsey told the police officers that he wished to cooperate with them, that on this occasion and on two other occasion^ Lindsey rode along in the car with the principal offender, Jeffrey Shipp while Shipp made a cocaine deal. Lindsey stated that he knew Shipp was coming to Medina to make a cocaine deal. There was testimony that a gun was found in the back seat next to where Lindsey sat.

Based on our review of the record, the trial court properly denied Lindsay's Crim. R. 29(A) motion for judgment of acquittal. *State v. Bridgeman*(1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 261, syllabus. There was substantial evidence upon which a jury could conclude that all elements of conspira*280cy to commit drug trafficking were proven beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. Eley*(1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 169, syllabus. It was not error to instruct on complicity. Lindsey's first assignment of error is overruled.

Assignment of Error

"Appellant's indefinite sentence of six (6) to twenty-five (25) years is contrary to section 2925.03(0X6) and, therefore, must be set aside."

This court addressed the argument that Lindsey now asserts in *State v. Dickey*(Dec. 27, 1989), Summit App. No. 14425, unreported. We certified our case to the Ohio Supreme Court as being a conflict with *State v. Russo*(Feb. 25, 1988), Cuyahoga App. No. 53571, unreported, the case upon which Lindsey relies to support his argument. Although there has been no ruling on our certification, we follow the precedent established by *State v. Dickey, supra*and overrule the second assignment of error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The Court finds that there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

CIRIGLIANO, J., for the court.

REECE, P.J., and CACIOPPO, J., concur.
§ 401.13 Confidentiality of contractor submissions. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 202(c)(5) and 205, the following procedures shall govern confidentiality of documents submitted under paragraph (c) of the standard clause found at § 401.14: ( a ) Agencies shall not disclose to third parties pursuant to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) any information disclosing a subject invention during the time which an initial patent application may be filed under paragraph (c) of the standard clause found at § 401.14 or such other clause in the funding agreement. This prohibition does not apply to information that has previously been published by the inventor, contractor, or otherwise.
( b ) Agencies shall not disclose or release, pursuant to requests under the Freedom of Information Act or otherwise, copies of any document which is part of an application for patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or any foreign patent office filed by the contractor (or its assignees, licensees, or employees) on a subject invention to which the contractor has elected to retain title. This prohibition does not extend to disclosure to other government agencies or contractors of government agencies under an obligation to maintain such information in confidence. This prohibition does not apply to documents published by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or any foreign patent office.
( c ) When implementing policies that encourage public dissemination of the results of work supported by the agency through government publications or other publications of technical reports, agencies shall not include copies of documents submitted by contractors pursuant to § 401.14(c) when a contractor notifies the agency that a particular report or other submission contains a disclosure of a subject invention to which it has elected title or may elect title, or such publication could create a statutory bar to obtaining patent protection.
[88 FR 17737, Mar. 24, 2023]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-110 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

Interface Region Imaging 

Spectrograph Mission 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and NORWAY 

Signed at Washington and Oslo 

December 14, 2010 and January 10, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
NORWAY 

Space Cooperation: Interface Region Imaging 

 Spectrograph Mission 

 Arrangement signed at Washington and Oslo 

 December 14, 2010 and January 10, 2011; 

 Entered into force January 10, 2011.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of SMART FOR LIFE, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this statement on March 31, 2022.



| | /s/ Alan B. Bergman                                                     
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Alan B. Bergman                                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Smart for Life, Inc. and will be retained by Smart for Life, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Official Journal L 283/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.283.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 283 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5516 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.283.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 283

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5516 October 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 936/2012 of 4 October 2012 on amending the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European order for payment procedure | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 936/2012 of 4 October 2012 on amending the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European order for payment procedure

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 1030.10 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Boundless Motor
Sports Racing, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul A. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A. KrugerChief Executive OfficerDate: February 11, 2004
# **Exhibit 10.2.8**

#  

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

CANDELA CORPORATION

1990 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 

The Board of Directors of Candela Corporation has amended the CandelaCorporation 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) as follows:

 

1.   Effective January 19, 2009, Article 5of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of the secondparagraph:

 

For Payment Periods beginning on or after January 1, 2009, theOption Price for each Payment Period shall be 85% of the average market priceof the Company’s Common Stock on the last business day of the Payment Period,rounded up to the nearest penny.

 

All provisions of the Plan not specifically mentioned in this Amendmentshall be considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with thechanges made in this Amendment.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

       

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                   4,977,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,666,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               300,000
<INVENTORY>                              2,720,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        10,500,000
<PP&E>                                   9,033,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           6,020,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,583,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,174,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   466,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              11,154,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,583,000
<SALES>                                  4,006,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,006,000
<CGS>                                    3,296,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,296,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (53,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (409,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (409,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0

        


</TABLE>
KALU Exhibit 10.6 - 3.31.2015 - 10-Q






Exhibit 10.6
2015 STI Umbrella Plan
2015 Performance Goal and Bonus Pool            
The performance goal for the STI Performance Period shall be $5.0 million in Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported in the Company’s Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (“Cash Flow”).  The bonus pool, representing the amount available for payment of bonuses, shall equal 15% of Cash Flow.        
Allocation of Bonus Pool to Executives
	
			
	Executive Name
	Executive Title
	Percent of Pool Allocated 
to Executive1

	Jack A. Hockema
	Chief Executive Officer
	39.8943%

	Keith A. Harvey
	EVP - Fabricated Products
	22.4571%

	John M. Donnan
	EVP - Legal, Compliance and Human Resources
	18.0317%

	John Barneson
	SVP - Corporate Development
	10.8322%

	[Other Designated Participant]
	[Designated Participant Title]
	 8.7847%






1 Subject to an aggregate maximum bonus opportunity per executive of $5.0 million per calendar year, pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan.


Administrative Provisions


The 2015 STI Umbrella Plan only applies to the calculation and award of incentive awards, if any.  There will be no duplication of benefits created by the 2015 STI Umbrella Plan.
The 2015 STI Umbrella Plan will not increase any benefits that may be payable under any severance and/or change in control agreements
§ 101.1 Authority and purposes. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued pursuant to sections 3, 4, 5, and 5A of the Home Owners' Loan Act (HOLA) (12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464, and 1464a), section 5239A of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 93a), and section 312(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5412(b)(2)(B)).
( b ) *Purposes.* This part establishes standards and procedures for a Federal savings association to elect to operate as a covered savings association pursuant to section 5A of the HOLA and clarifies the requirements for the treatment of covered savings associations. It also establishes standards and procedures to terminate an election and to reelect to operate as a covered savings association.