alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
        for the three months ended February 28, 2005 (the “Quarterly Report”)
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                         
|    

| | By:    | */s/ Garry L. Anselmo*     
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | Name:  | Garry L. Anselmo           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| | Date:  | April 18, 2005             

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB.
  A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will
  be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
  not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company
  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
§ 1229.7 Discretionary actions applicable to undercapitalized Banks. ( a ) *Discretionary safeguards.* The Director may take any action with regard to an undercapitalized Bank that may be taken with regard to a significantly undercapitalized Bank under section 1366 of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4616) or § 1229.8 or § 1229.9 if the Director determines that such action is necessary to assure the safe and sound operation of the Bank and the Bank's compliance with its risk-based and minimum capital requirements in a reasonable period of time.
( b ) *Procedures.* Before finalizing any action under this section, the Director shall provide a Bank written notice describing the proposed action or actions and an opportunity to submit information that the Bank considers relevant to the Director's decision to take such action in accordance with § 1229.12 of this subpart.
[74 FR 5604, Jan. 30, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 76295, Nov. 2, 2016]
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________ No . 2 2

- 1 847

_______________ JA MES STEUERT , Appellant
v. L

- 3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

_______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 1 : 11

- cv - 0 3385 ) District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez

_______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on January 26 , 202 3 Before: BIBAS , NYGAARD, and FUENTES , Circuit Judges (Filed: January 26, 2023 )

_______________ OPINION *

_______________ BIBAS, Circuit Judge

. James Steuert appeals the dismissal of his complaint. But because the District Court never issued a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction to review that dismissal. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The District Court gave Steuert twenty days to file an amended complaint but did

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding precedent.2 not “pr ovid e [ ] express notice” that it s order would “automatically produce a final order of dismissal when the time to amend [ran] out.” Weber v. McGrogan , 939 F.3d 232, 240 (3d Cir. 2019). And though Steuert filed a notice of appeal after those twenty days, he d id not clearly stand on his complaint. See i d. So we will dismiss his appeal.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Ben-Tsur Joseph                                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ben-Tsur                JosephChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:                November 14, 2008   |

----
## LB-^RTMENTO F 

# 'EstaSCisfied : 180 2 

# Toz mofMassem , 9\[ez

u 7orl<^^§ ^ ZOiOl'GV 1 5 PU:0 1 ImmHat L315-769-358 8 6 0 Mai nStree t

(!Faj d315-769-057 8 !Massena, 0^iu'yor((^1366 Zfittp://wzvzo.masseTmxvorl(;s.a)m/totun/indej(.asp

Novembe r15 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s J . DeVaney , Chie f EA S & Domesti cAnalysi s Divisio n Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Essentia l Ai rServic e Division , X-5 3 W8 6 308,120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Re : DOT-OST-1997-284 2 Proposa l fo rCap e Ai rt o Provid e Subsidize d Essentia l Ai rServic e fo rMassena , Ne wYor k Dea rMr . DeVaney : O n behal fo f th e Tow n o fMassen a an d it s Tow n Council , I a m writin g t o commen t o n th e secon d roun d o fproposal s submitte d fo rou rEssentia l Ai rServic e contrac t whic h expire d i n September . O n Novembe r 10 , 2010 , th e Massen a Tow n Council vote d b ya margi n o f4- 1 t o suppor t th e Optio n 3 proposa l fro m Cap e Air . I t i s ou rbelie ftha t Massen a wil l b e bes t serve d b yth e Cap e Ai rproposa l t o provid e servic e t o Alban y wit h a connectin g fligh t t o Boston . Whil e w e wer e intrigue d b yth e competin g proposal s fro m tw o othe r bidders , ther e wa s a significan t leve l o funcertaint ywit h bot h o fthos e proposals . Th e Tow n Council has bee n impresse d wit h Cap e Air' s servic e an d reliabilit ydurin g it s initia l contrac t t o provid e EA

S t o ou rcommunity . Thi s servic e i s indee d "essential " fo rcommunitie s lik e our s tha t fin d themselve s locate d prohibitiv e distance s fro m mediu m an d larg e airlin e hubs . Th e DO Ti s t o b e commende d fo rassistin g i n securin g Cap e Ai rt o provid e Massena' s presen t EA S afte r th e failur e o fBi g Sk

yAirline s lef t u s wit h n o servic e a fe wyear s ago . Cap e Air' s presenc e an d servic e wa s a welcom e relie ft o traveler s wh o wer e face d wit h th e prospec t o ftravelin g 7 0 t o 10 0 mile s t o boar d a n airplane . W e than k

bot h Cap e Ai ran d you ragencyfo rcomin g t o ou rassistanc e a t tha t time . No ww e loo k

t o ente ra ne wchapte rwit h EA S an d Cap e Air .

# I , Th e Tow n Counci l i s please d tha t th e DO Ttakes ou ropinio n int o consideratio n i n thi s process . W e ar e als o confiden t tha t DOT' s oversigh t an d du e diligenc e wil l ensur e tha t whoeve ri s awarde d th e EA S contrac t fo rMassen a has adequat e busines s resource s t o preven t an yfutur e interruptio n o fou rai r service . Th e EA S progra m i s a wonderfu l exampl e o fho wth e federa l governmen t ca n hav e a direc t impac t o n th e America n publi cb yprovidin g service s a t th e loca l level . W e ar e thankfu l i t exist s an d w e hop e i t wil l continu e fo rman ymor e years . I fyo u hav e an yquestion s o rconcern s regardin g thi s lette ro rth e Tow n Council' s stanc e o n thes e EA S proposals , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t me . Sincerely , Josep h D . Gray , Superviso r Tow n o fMassen a
Exhibit 4.48

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

We, 1Verge Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a limited liability company registered in the PRC, hereby irrevocably authorize any individual appointed, in writing, by 1Verge Internet Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”)  who is approved by Youku Tudou Inc. (“Authorizee”), to the extent permitted by PRC Law, as our sole attorney to solely exercise, in the manner approved by Youku Tudou Inc., the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney (“POA”) pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Business Operations Agreement entered into among the WFOE, Heyi Pictures Inc.  (“Heyi Pictures”), Zhu Huilong and us on December 22, 2014 (the “Operations Agreement”):

 

We hereby authorize and designate the Authorizee to vote on our behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of Heyi Pictures and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to us by law and under the Articles of Association of Heyi Pictures, including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders’ meetings, to accept any notification about the holding and discussion procedures of such meetings, to attend the shareholders’ meetings of Heyi Pictures and exercise our full voting rights (e.g. as my authorized representative at the shareholders’ meetings of the company, to designate and appoint the executive director or directors of the Board and the general manager and to decide the allotment of profits, etc.), and to sell or transfer any or all of our shares of Heyi Pictures .

 

The authorization we grant to the WFOE can be re-authorized or assigned to any third party without our consent.  In exercising the rights and powers provided hereunder, the Authorizee shall act with due care and diligence and pursuant to this POA and the applicable laws.

 

The POA shall take effect retrospectively from October 1, 2014 and will remain effective as long as Heyi Pictures exists.

 

 

	
 
    	
1Verge   Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ 1Verge   Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date: December 22, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         116,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  920,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    634,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,868,625
<PP&E>                                      24,478,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,030,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,799,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     6,107,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,666,957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,030,730
<SALES>                                      7,704,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,704,295
<CGS>                                        3,384,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,384,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,270,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,112,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,234,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (231,719)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,002,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,002,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)


</TABLE>
Sherry Radack

ChiefJustice

Terry Jennings

Evelyn Keyes

Laura Carter Higley

Jane Bland

Michael Massengale

Harvey Brown

Rebeca Huddle

Russell Lloyd

Justices

Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk ofthe Court

Janet Williams

Chief Staff Attorney

Phone: 713-274-2700

Fax: 713-755-8131

www.txcourts.gov/lstcoa.aspx

May 12, 2015

Michael William Elliott

905 Front Street

Richmond, TX 77469

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Daniel DeSantiago-Caraza

#145761

Fort Bend County Jail

1410 Williams Way Blvd

Richmond, TX 77469

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-14-00506-CR Trial Court Case Number: 12-DCR-059524

Style: Daniel DeSantiago-Caraza

v.

The State of Texas

John J. Harritylll

Assistant District Attorney

Fort Bend County

301 Jackson Street Room 101

Richmond, TX 77469

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

The First Court of Appeals has set the above cause for submission on June 16, 2015 before a panel

consisting of ChiefJustice Radack, JusticeHigley and Justice Massengale, subjectto change by the Court.

The Court will not hear oral argument.

Parties are encouraged to sign up for automated e-mail notices on the "CaseMail" page of the Court's

website (http://www.txcourts.gOv/lstcoa).

Very truly yours,

C

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court
Court of Appeals, First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066
§ 4.45 The joints. As regards the joints the factors of disability reside in reductions of their normal excursion of movements in different planes. Inquiry will be directed to these considerations: ( a ) Less movement than normal (due to ankylosis, limitation or blocking, adhesions, tendon-tie-up, contracted scars, etc.).
( b ) More movement than normal (from flail joint, resections, nonunion of fracture, relaxation of ligaments, etc.).
( c ) Weakened movement (due to muscle injury, disease or injury of peripheral nerves, divided or lengthened tendons, etc.).
( d ) Excess fatigability.
( e ) Incoordination, impaired ability to execute skilled movements smoothly.
( f ) Pain on movement, swelling, deformity or atrophy of disuse. Instability of station, disturbance of locomotion, interference with sitting, standing and weight-bearing are related considerations. For the purpose of rating disability from arthritis, the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle are considered major joints; multiple involvements of the interphalangeal, metacarpal and carpal joints of the upper extremities, the interphalangeal, metatarsal and tarsal joints of the lower extremities, the cervical vertebrae, the dorsal vertebrae, and the lumbar vertebrae, are considered groups of minor joints, ratable on a parity with major joints. The lumbosacral articulation and both sacroiliac joints are considered to be a group of minor joints, ratable on disturbance of lumbar spine functions.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2508 

To require Federal contractors to participate in the basic pilot program 

for employment eligibility verification. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require Federal contractors to participate in the basic 

pilot program for employment eligibility verification. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS 

4 TO PARTICIPATE IN BASIC PILOT PROGRAM 

5 FOR EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY 

6 VERIFICATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(e)(1) of the Illegal 

8 Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2508 IH

1 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following: 

3 ‘‘(C) FEDERAL CONTRACTORS AND SUB4 CONTRACTORS.— 

5 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Any Federal con6 tractor described in clause (ii), and any 

7 subcontractor described in clause (iii), 

8 shall elect to participate in the basic pilot 

9 program described in section 403(a) and 

10 shall comply with the terms and conditions 

11 of such election. 

12 ‘‘(ii) FEDERAL CONTRACTORS DE13 SCRIBED.—A Federal contractor is de14 scribed in this clause if the contractor— 

15 ‘‘(I) employs individuals; and 

16 ‘‘(II) has been awarded (and has 

17 not completed performance of) a con18 tract by the Federal government for 

19 the procurement of goods or services 

20 in an amount exceeding the simplified 

21 acquisition threshold. 

22 ‘‘(iii) SUBCONTRACTORS DE23 SCRIBED.—A subcontractor is described in 

24 this clause if the subcontractor— 

25 ‘‘(I) employs individuals; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2508 IH

1 ‘‘(II) has been awarded (and has 

2 not completed performance of) a sub3 contract by a Federal contractor de4 scribed in clause (ii). 

5 ‘‘(iv) COVERAGE OF ENTIRE WORK6 FORCE.—In implementing this subpara7 graph, the Attorney General shall ensure 

8 that the pilot program is applied to all of 

9 the employees of a Federal contractor or 

10 subcontractor, not just the employees per11 forming the contract or subcontract, as the 

12 case may be.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply to contracts entered into on or 

15 after the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 70.40 Administrative procedures. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 10037 , Feb. 16, 2023.
Cross Reference
This amendment was delayed until Feb. 16, 2025, at 88 FR 90120 , Dec. 29, 2023.
( a ) This section applies only to legacy claims.
( b ) Upon denial of an initial claim for beneficiary travel, VA will provide the claimant written notice of the decision and advise the claimant of reconsideration and appeal rights. A claimant who disagrees with the initial decision denying the claim for beneficiary travel, in whole or in part, may obtain reconsideration under § 17.133 of this chapter and may file an appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals under parts 19 and 20 of this chapter. An appeal may be made directly to the Board of Veterans' Appeals without requesting reconsideration.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 111, 501, 1701, 1714, 1720, 1728, 1782, 1783, E.O. 11302)
[73 FR 36798, June 30, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 43748, July 22, 2022]
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike McKeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 26, 2024  /s/ Mike McKeever  Mike McKeever  President  Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC  (senior officer in charge of securitization)