alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                          356,000
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,134,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,490,000
<PP&E>                          000
<DEPRECIATION>                  000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,555,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           204,000
<BONDS>                         000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<COMMON>                        000
<OTHER-SE>                      1,351,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,555,000
<SALES>                         000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,122,000
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   21,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                245,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 856,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             856,000
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    856,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   13.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                   13.28
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,973
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,183
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    159,824
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         112,623
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           115,639
<LOANS>                                      1,067,688
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,440,070
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,167,455
<SHORT-TERM>                                    76,908
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,599
<LONG-TERM>                                     53,379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,041
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,440,070
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,498
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,132
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   565
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                54,196
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,443
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,753
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,256
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  69
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,036
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,036
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,300
<LOANS-PAST>                                        73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,447
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      769
<RECOVERIES>                                       191
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,090
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,090
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1206.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth the policy and procedures of the FHFA with respect to the establishment and collection of the assessments of the Regulated Entities under 12 U.S.C. 4516.
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for 1

the Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-4050

___________

Lorena Fay Overfield, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Francis N. Bonsignore; Marsh and * Western District of Missouri.

McLennan Companies; William *

M. Mercer, Inc.; William M. * (UNPUBLISHED)

Mercer of Kentucky, Inc., *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 1996

 Filed: October 15 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lorena Overfield appeals from the district court's orders dismissing 1

one defendant and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in

her action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

(ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Having carefully reviewed the record and

the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court was

correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Annie Le Bowski, Plaintiff, *v.*Jacob J. Le Bowski, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

June, 1899.)

Action for a separation — Supreme Court will not grant alimony.

The Supreme Court will not allow a wife alimony and counsel fees in an action for a separation, as the police courts afford her ample remedies for compelling her husband to support her.

Motion for alimony and counsel fee in a suit for a separation.

N. Smith, for motion.

C. H. Van Sinderen, .opposed.

Gildersleeve, J.

This is a motion for alimony and counsel fee in an action for a separation. It is not my custom, to grant this kind of application in separation cases." The police courts afford to the wife ample means to compel her husband to supply her with proper support and maintenance, and there is no reason fon applying to the Supreme Court for the relief here demanded. The motion must be denied, without costs and without prejudice to police remedies.

Motion denied, without costs.
§ 1026.21 Treatment of credit balances. When a credit balance in excess of $1 is created in connection with a transaction (through transmittal of funds to a creditor in excess of the total balance due on an account, through rebates of unearned finance charges or insurance premiums, or through amounts otherwise owed to or held for the benefit of a consumer), the creditor shall: ( a ) Credit the amount of the credit balance to the consumer's account;
( b ) Refund any part of the remaining credit balance, upon the written request of the consumer; and
( c ) Make a good faith effort to refund to the consumer by cash, check, or money order, or credit to a deposit account of the consumer, any part of the credit balance remaining in the account for more than 6 months, except that no further action is required if the consumer's current location is not known to the creditor and cannot be traced through the consumer's last known address or telephone number.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           18000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           515000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        101000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (602000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1016000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Paul A. Kruger, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc. 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date:March 2, 2005 /s/ Paul A. Kruger   Paul A. Kruger, Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer and President
§ 205.2 Address for mail and service; telephone number. ( a ) Mail under this part should be addressed to the General Counsel at the address specified in § 201.1(c)(1) of this chapter.
( b ) Service by hand shall be made upon an authorized person from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday in the Copyright Information Section, U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress, James Madison Memorial Building, Room LM-401, 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC. Persons authorized to accept service of process are the General Counsel of the Copyright Office and his or her designees.
( c ) The Office of the General Counsel may be reached by telephone during normal business hours specified in paragraph (b) of this section at 202-707-8380.
[69 FR 39334, June 30, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 37840, July 2, 2008; 82 FR 9365, Feb. 6, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTERLY 
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER 
ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,768,790
<SECURITIES>                                 4,199,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,019,739
<PP&E>                                         189,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,272,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,285,760
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,272,397
<SALES>                                         60,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,448,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,998,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,998,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID JONES AND LINDA JONES

,

Appellant,

v.

TRANSPECOS BANK

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 217

- C V

Appeal from the

143 rd D istrict Court

of Reeves C ounty, Texas

(TC# 13

- 10

- 20505

- CVR )

O R D E R

The Court has reviewed Appellee’s objections to Appellants’ docketing statement.

Because Appellee requests that the Court act on the objections and order Appellants to amend

the docketing statement, we have construed the objections as a motion. The purpo se of the

docketing statement is to provide the appellate court with basic information about an appeal

before the record is filed. The statements made in Appellants’ docketing statement related to

jurisdiction, the type of relief sought in the appeal, and the nature and finality of the trial court’s

judgment are not determinative of these issues. Accordingly, the Court overrules Appellee’s

objections and denies its request for the Court to order Appellants to amend the docketing

statement.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20 th day of August , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 23, 2022


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2020-B
#### TOLEIKIS *v.*AUSTIN.

Appeal and Error — Demurrer—Finality of Orders.

A case is still pending for further proceedings in the lower court and a writ of error is unavailable where an action for false imprisonment is against three defendants jointly, and a demurrer to the declaration is sustained in favor of two of them and overruled as to the third.

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J.

Submitted June 25, 1917.

(Docket No. 12.)

Decided July 26, 1917.

Case by John Toleikis against John L. Austin and others for false imprisonment. From an order sustaining demurrers in part, plaintiff brings error.

Writ dismissed.

*Proctor K. Owens,*for appellant.

*Philip H. Robinson (John L. Austin,*of counsel), for appellees.

Moore, J.

The plaintiff filed his declaration against the defendants, John L. Austin, a justice of the peace of the village of Highland Park, Charles Seymour, chief of police of said village, and Charles Brown, a patrolman of said village. The declaration attempts to set forth a case because of the false imprisonment of the plaintiff and contains two counts. The defendants demurred to said declaration, claiming it did not state a cause of action. Upon the hearing the lower court entered an order sustaining said demurrers as to all of the defendants to the second count of plaintiff’s declaration, and sustaining the demurrers of the defendants Austin and Seymour as to the first count of the declaration, and overruled the demurrer of defendant Brown, the patrolman, to the first count of *334the declaration. The plaintiff seeks to bring the case here by writ of error.

Defendants assert that a writ of error will not lie in this case; that the province of a writ of error is only to review a final judgment. It is also claimed by the defendants that the declaration does not state a cause of action. •

The case is one against three defendants sued jointly. The demurrer is sustained as to two of them, and overruled as to one of them. This leaves the case still pending for further proceedings in the court below. Under such circumstances the writ of error is not available. *Perry*v. *Church,*107 Mich. 480 (65 N. W. 273), and the cases cited therein; *In re Apsey’s Estate,*173 Mich. 426 (138 N. W. 1054).

The case is dismissed, and the record remanded, with costs in favor of defendants.

Kuhn, C. J., and Stone, Ostrander, Bird, Steere, Brooke, and Fellows, JJ., concurred.
#### § 39.8 Withdrawal of grant application.

A State or Tribal Organization representative may withdraw an application by submitting to VA a written document requesting withdrawal.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)

[77 FR 4473, Jan. 30, 2012]
§ 59.170 Forms. All forms required by this part are available on the internet at “*http://www.va.gov/forms/ ”* for VA Forms and at “*http://www.gsa.gov ”* for Standard Forms, or at the Veterans Health Administration, Room 789, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20420. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137, Section 2, 3, 4, and 4a of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended, Pub. L. 90-480, 42 U.S.C. 4151-4157)
[73 FR 58880, Oct. 8, 2008]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1229/2004

of 2 July 2004         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 July 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 2 July 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----