alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1208.61 Notice. At least 30 days before the initiation of garnishment proceedings, FHFA will send, by first class mail to the debtor's last known address, a written notice informing the debtor of: ( a ) The nature and amount of the debt;
( b ) FHFA's intention to initiate proceedings to collect the debt through deductions from the debtor's pay until the debt and all accumulated interest penalties and administrative costs are paid in full;
( c ) An explanation of the debtor's rights as set forth in § 1208.62(c); and
( d ) The time frame within which the debtor may exercise these rights. FHFA shall retain a stamped copy of the notice indicating the date the notice was mailed.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.440 Dietary services. The State home must comply with the requirements concerning the dietary services set forth in § 51.140, except paragraph 51.140(f). For purposes of this section, the references in the cited section to resident refer to a participant in subpart F of this part. The State home adult day health care program will provide nourishment to participants on the following schedule: ( a ) At regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community, each participant may receive and program management must provide at least two meals daily for those veterans staying more than four hours and at least one meal for those staying less than four hours.
( b ) The program management must offer snacks and fluids as appropriate to meet the participants' nutritional and fluid needs.
CAS - EX 10.2 - 3.31.15







March 17, 2015






Mr. Marec E. Edgar, Esq.
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary 
c/o A. M. Castle & Co.
1420 Kensington Road - Suite 220
Oak Brook, IL 60523


Re: Bonus Award


Dear Marec:


In recognition of your continued efforts with respect to the upcoming 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of A. M.  Castle & Co. (the "Company"), the Company will pay you a bonus of $50,000 (the "Bonus")  if you remain actively employed by the Company on a full-time basis through the close of business on date of 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting Date").  You will not receive any portion of the Bonus if, prior to the Annual Meeting  Date, your  employment  with the Company terminates for any reason.


The Company will pay the Bonus in a lump sum within  10 business days following the Annual Meeting Date.  The Bonus will be paid in cash and will be less required tax withholdings.


This letter does not confer upon you any right to continue in the employment of the Company for any period or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Company or you to terminate your employment at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause.


Please indicate your acceptance of the provisions of this letter agreement by signing the enclosed copy of this letter agreement and returning it to my attention.


	
	
	1420 Kensington Road
Suite 220
Oak Brook, IL 60523
amcastle.com









E-1
# C_2021455EN.01000401.xml

| 10.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 November 2021

(2021/C 455/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1577 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0592 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8555 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,197 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 360,99 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5926 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9476 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 11,2605 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5642 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4397 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0186 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6192 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5601 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3964 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3989 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5190 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 500,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8039 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,980 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,1148 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,932 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3847 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5335 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,7910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1577

JPY

Japanese yen

130,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85380

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0592

ISK

Iceland króna

150,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8555

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,197

HUF

Hungarian forint

360,99

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5926

RON

Romanian leu

4,9476

TRY

Turkish lira

11,2605

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5642

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4397

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0186

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6192

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5601

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,47

ZAR

South African rand

17,3964

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3989

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5190

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 500,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8039

PHP

Philippine peso

57,980

RUB

Russian rouble

82,1148

THB

Thai baht

37,932

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3847

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5335

INR

Indian rupee

85,7910

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Hirsch v. Bunker Hill Mutual Insurance Co.

*Marvin H. Levin,*for plaintiff.

*Ralph B. Umsted,*for defendant.

*Owen Biddle,*for garnishee.

*260February 15, 1957.

Reimel, J.,

On May 8, 1956, plaintiff instituted suit against defendant in Fayette County to recover $12,687.50 loss sustained by plaintiff because of fire damage to property which was insured by defendant. The fire which caused such loss occurred on February 13, 1954. On October 15, 1956, judgment for the above mentioned sum was entered against defendant for want of an answer. On November 5, 1956, this judgment was transferred to Philadelphia and judgment execution entered against the garnishees.

On September 27, 1954, the entire business of defendant was suspended by the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth under the authority of section 502 of The Insurance Department Act of May 17,1921, P. L. 789, 40 PS §202. This act was amended effective March 22, 1956, P. L. 1328, and under this amendment: “From the date of such suspension . . . no action at law or equity shall be commenced or prosecuted nor shall any judgment be . . . issued or prosecuted against the suspended company, association, exchange, title insurance company, fraternal benefit society, or beneficial society, or order, or against its property, in any court of this Commonwealth.”

This matter is now before the court on defendant’s rule to show cause why execution shall not be stayed on the ground that the above amendment prohibits plaintiff’s action. Plaintiff contends that said amendment cannot be applied retrospectively and to prohibit this action would so apply it.

Statutes must be construed to apply prospectively rather than retrospectively unless there is clear legislative intent to the contrary: Statutory Construction Act of May 28, 1937, P. L. 1019, art. IV, sec. 56, 46 PS §556. It must be noted that plaintiff’s action was not instituted until well over a month after the *261effective date of the amendment. The statute as amended prohibits an act which had not taken place at the time of its effective date and, therefore, it cannot be called retrospective in this case. It prohibits any suit brought after the insurance company is suspended regardless of whether it was so suspended under the old statute or the amendment thereto. Plaintiff’s suit was instituted after defendant company was suspended from doing business and after the effective date of the amendment and, therefore, is prohibited. For the above reasons, defendant’s rule to stay attachment execution is made absolute.
42396.

#### HOOD v. AKINS.

Jordan, Judge.

An order of the trial judge sustaining plaintiff’s oral motion to strike an amended answer and cross action as barred by the statute of limitation, leaves the case pending in the court below and is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie. *Dove v. Maxwell,*184 Ga. 460 (191 SE 916); *Code Ann.*§ 6-701. The appeal must be dismissed pursuant to Section 13 (b) of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 500). *Birdwell v.*
      *734
      *Pippen,*113 Ga. App. 202 (147 SE2d 673). See *Darden v. Roberts,*193 Ga. 637 (19 SE2d 270); *Sanders v. Sanders,*212 Ga. 244 (91 SE2d 604), and cases cited therein for numerous rulings to the same effect.

Argued November 9, 1966

Decided December 2, 1966.

*Jess H. Watson,*for appellant.

*Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Ralph H. Hicks, Hoke Smith, Sam F. Lowe, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 1071.301 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Bureau may file an answer to the application. Unless Bureau counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as consent to the award requested.
( b ) If Bureau counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days and further extensions may be granted by the adjudicative officer upon joint request by Bureau counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of Bureau counsel's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, Bureau counsel shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 1071.305 of this part.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2080 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to conform the District 

charter to revisions made by the Council of the District of Columbia 

relating to public education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) (both by request): 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to conform the District charter to revisions made by the Council of the District of Columbia relating to public education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONFORMING DISTRICT CHARTER TO COUNCIL 

4 AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PUBLIC EDU5 CATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The District of Columbia Home 

7 Rule Act is amended— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2080 IH

1 (1) by striking section 452 (sec. 1—204.52, 

2 D.C. Official Code); and 

3 (2) by striking section 495 (sec. 1—204.95, 

4 D.C. Official Code). 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

6 of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to 

7 section 452 and the item relating to section 495. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2622 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2622

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
  to require de novo review of claims determinations made by employee 
                             benefit plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2007

  Mrs. McCarthy of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
  to require de novo review of claims determinations made by employee 
                             benefit plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equality for Workers under ERISA Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DE NOVO REVIEW OF CLAIMS DETERMINATIONS BY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 
              PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 502(e) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1132(e)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Any action commenced under subsection (a)(1)(B) shall be 
adjudicated as a de novo proceeding without deference to any claim 
determination made prior to the commencement of such action.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to claim determinations made by plans on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Renal Treatment Centers, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-88418, 33-93060, 33-
96828, 333-3716, 333-10839, 333-10841 and 333-21281) and S-8 (File Nos. 33-
85750, 33-94262) of our report dated July 14, 1995, except for Note 9 as to
which the date is July 24, 1995, relating to the financial statements of the
Wichita Dialysis Group, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Renal Treatment Centers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/Baird, Kurtz & Dobson
----------------------------
BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON

Wichita, Kansas
March 25, 1997
<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radva Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date:             August 9, 2004 /s/ Luther I. Dickens
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 Luther I. Dickens
                                 Chief Executive Officer

Date:             August 9, 2004 /s/ William F. Fry
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 William F. Fry
                                 Vice President-
                                 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE>

                                                                                              EXHIBIT 10(i)
<S>                                                                          <C>
ANDERSEN ANDERSEN & STRONG, L.C.                                             941 East 3300 South, Suite 220
Certified Public Accountants and Business Consultants Board                     Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
Member SEC Practice Section of the AICPA                                             Telephone 801-486-0096
                                                                                           Fax 801-486-0098
</TABLE>



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


THE BRALORNE MINING COMPANY



         We hereby  consent to the use of our report dated January 15, 2000, for
the period ended November 30, 1999 to be included in the form 10-K in accordance
with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



                        Andersen Andersen & Strong, L.C.


 //s// L. Rex Andersen

February 17, 2000
Salt Lake City, Utah

         A member of ACF International with affiliated offices worldwide




                                       59
#### § 1251.2 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to the terms used in and related specifically to this part. Definitions of other terms may be found in 12 CFR part 1201, General Definitions Applying to All Federal Housing Finance Agency Regulations:

*Capital Magnet Fund* means that Fund established at section 1339(a) of the Safety and Soundness Act, 12 U.S.C. 4569(a).

*Housing Trust Fund* means that Fund established by section 1338(a) of the Safety and Soundness Act, 12 U.S.C. 4568(a).
# C_2021369EN.01000101.xml

| 14.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 September 2021

(2021/C 369/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1780 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1853 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0873 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,348 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 349,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5518 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,9468 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6015 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4931 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1641 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6575 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5821 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7103 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6059 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 787,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8893 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,819 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,8875 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,762 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1563 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4010 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,8440 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1780

JPY

Japanese yen

129,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85120

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1853

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0873

ISK

Iceland króna

151,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,348

HUF

Hungarian forint

349,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5518

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

9,9468

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6015

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4931

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1641

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6575

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5821

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,74

ZAR

South African rand

16,7103

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6059

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 787,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8893

PHP

Philippine peso

58,819

RUB

Russian rouble

85,8875

THB

Thai baht

38,762

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1563

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4010

INR

Indian rupee

86,8440

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
ATEC-20150331EX10.1




Exhibit 10.1
Summary of the 2015 Alphatec Holdings, Inc. Discretionary Bonus Plan 
2015 Discretionary Bonus Plan for United States Employees and James Corbett (President and CEO), Michael O’Neill (CFO),Michael Plunkett (COO), Stephen Lubischer (VP, Sales) and Ebun Garner (General Counsel and SVP) 
In the United States, under our 2015 Discretionary Bonus Plan (the “2015 Bonus Plan”) the target cash bonus is a formula expressed as a percentage of each employee’s 2015 base salary, subject to the achievement of corporate performance criteria. The corporate performance criteria were predicated on the achievement of: (i) certain revenue and income targets, and (ii) certain annual free cash flow (defined as EBITDA plus or minus change in working capital (inventory, receivables, payables) minus capital expenditures) targets. Each set of targets were established by the Company’s Nominating, Governance and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) in accordance with the 2015 operating plan that was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. For the executive officers listed above, which are the named executive officers in the Company’s 2015 proxy, and the Company’s other executive officers, 100% of the bonus is based upon the Company’s performance compared to the revenue and income targets. For the remainder of the employees in the United States a portion of their bonus is based upon Company’s performance compared to the revenue and income targets, and a portion of their bonus is based upon the individual’s achievement of such individual’s personal performance goals. The bonus is payable in 2016.  The Committee approved all financial performance criteria for the awarding of such cash bonuses. 


With respect to all of the bonuses described above, we have to have achieved a threshold of financial performance that was established by the Committee before any of the discretionary bonuses based on the financial criteria set forth above would become payable. However, the Committee has the authority to issue bonuses if such criteria has not been achieved if it believes that circumstances warrant the payment of such bonus.  Likewise, even if the financial criteria were met, the Committee has the ability to not issue any individual a bonus if it believes that circumstances warrant the non-payment of such bonus. 
Under the 2015 Bonus Plan, the range of bonus opportunity as a percentage of 2015 base salary for each of our named executive officers in our 2015 proxy statement is as follows: 


	
								
	Name
	 
	2015 
Base Salary
	 
	2015 Target 
Bonus 
Percentage

	James Corbett, President and CEO
	 
	$
	530,000
	

	 
	80
	%

	Michael Plunkett, COO
	 
	$
	335,000
	

	 
	60
	%

	Michael O’Neill, CFO
	 
	$
	325,000
	

	 
	60
	%

	Stephen Lubischer, VP, Sales
	 
	$
	290,000
	

	 
	60 
	%

	Ebun Garner, General Counsel and SVP
	 
	$
	280,000
	

	 
	60
	%