Facility _Information

facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1073 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information

plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Prairie Creek

3300 C Street SW

Cedar Rapids

IA 52404-7457 3300 C Street SW

Cedar Rapids

IA 52404-7457

Page 2Facility _Information

RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information

ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification No Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 4Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 5Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 6Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 7Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 8Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 9Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 10Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 11Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 12Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 13Facility _Information

Facility: Prairie CreekThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” Web site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR.

Page 14facility _contacts

facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1073 1 Manager Environmental Services Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradleypincombe@alliantenergy.com TRUE 1073 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417943203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy.comorvellashipman@allaintenergy.com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized

facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1073 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized

facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 17facility _other_materials

facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1073 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 5-7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Corrugated Cardboard (OCCR)

TRUE FALSE 5 The amount of Old Corrugated Cardboard (OCCR) fired in boilier #1 and 2 combined shall not exceed 5.0 tons per hour.The amount of OCCR fired in Boiler 1 and 2 shall not exceed 10% of the total Heat Input at any tim e. No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 25 Permitted to burn 25 cubic yards once every 5 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Landfill Gas TRUE TRUE Measurement Units are Cubic Feet. No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Oil/water separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Oily

water TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Turbine Cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 5-7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Used Oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallon/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Used oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1 Permitted to burn one 55 gallon drum per month. No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1073 Water-based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials

rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuelheat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 1073 1 Stoker - overfeed Dry Bottom coal 303.3 245 11.5 1073 2 Stoker - overfeed Dry Bottom coal 303.3 304 11.5 1073 3 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 571.5 562.3 49.5 1073 4 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 1400 1611 148.3

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 9.9 83.38 79.5 950 950 1.01 1.02 FALSE 1.03 9.9 83.38 80.2 950 950 1.05 1.06 FALSE 1.07 46.4 86.25 82.3 1300 1300 1.09 1.11 FALSE 1.12 137.9 87 83.7 2175 1800 1.14 1.15 FALSE 1.16

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.04 6442 49.43 N FALSE FALSE 1.08 6407 54.53 N FALSE FALSE 1.13 3908 35.93 N FALSE FALSE 1.17 3684 33.5 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1073 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.9 1073 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 97.63 1073 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 94.72 1073 1 natural gas 2007 0.08 1073 1 natural gas 2008 2.37 1073 1 natural gas 2009 5.28 1073 1 oil - distillate 2007 0.02 1073 2 coal - subbituminous 2007 95.8 1073 2 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.76 1073 2 coal - subbituminous 2009 93.14 1073 2 natural gas 2007 4.2 1073 2 natural gas 2008 0.24 1073 2 natural gas 2009 6.86 1073 3 coal - subbituminous 2007 92.56 1073 3 coal - subbituminous 2008 76.28 1073 3 coal - subbituminous 2009 74.13 1073 3 natural gas 2007 4.26 1073 3 natural gas 2008 21.15 1073 3 natural gas 2009 25.87 1073 3 oil - distillate 2007 0.08 1073 3 oil - distillate 2008 0.14 1073 3 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2007 3.1 Landfill Gas 1073 3 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2008 2.43 Landfill Gas 1073 4 coal - subbituminous 2007 97.63 1073 4 coal - subbituminous 2008 96.731 1073 4 coal - subbituminous 2009 26.92 1073 4 natural gas 2007 0.42 1073 4 natural gas 2008 0.402 1073 4 natural gas 2009 73.08 1073 4 oil - distillate 2008 0.005 1073 4 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2007 1.95 Landfill gas 1073 4 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2008 2.862 Landfill gasLandfill gas

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1073 3 Overfire Air 9/1/2009 1073 4 Low NOx Burner 6/1/1995 1073 4 Overfire Air 6/1/1995

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 1073 1 Low Sulfur Coal 3/1/1995 1073 2 Low Sulfur Coal 3/1/1995 1073 3 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1990 1073 4 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1990

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online 1073 3 Flue gas conditioning to control opacity (e.g., SO3 injection, ammonia, other) 11/1/2009 1073 4 Flue gas conditioning to control opacity (e.g., SO3 injection, ammonia, other) 1/1/1997

Page 27facility _units

facility _id unit_id 1073 1 1073 2 1073 3 1073 4

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1073 1 1 1073 1 2 1073 1 3 1073 1 4 1073 2 1 1073 2 2 1073 2 3 1073 2 4 1073 3 3 1073 4 4

Page 29facility _controls

facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1073 ESP-1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 10/1/1978 1073 ESP-2 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 10/1/1978 1073 ESP-3 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1971 1073 ESP-4 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1974

Page 30facility _controls

reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports

facility _id sampling_port_id 1073 CS-U1U2 1073 ESP Inlet-4 1073 Stack-3 1073 Stack-4

Page 32facility _stacks

facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1073 Unit 3-Stack 201 12.44 1073 Unit 4-Stack 201 13 1073 Units 1&2 - CS 327 9.958

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1073 Unit 1 1073 Unit 2 1073 Unit 3 1073 Unit 4

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1073 Unit 1 1 1 Unit 1073 Unit 1 CS-U1U2 3 Sam pling Port next 1073 Unit 1 ESP-1 2 PM control 1073 Unit 1 Units 1&2 - CS 4 Stack 1073 Unit 2 2 1 Unit 1073 Unit 2 CS-U1U2 3 Sam pling Port next 1073 Unit 2 ESP-2 2 PM control 1073 Unit 2 Units 1&2 - CS 4 Stack 1073 Unit 3 3 1 Unit 1073 Unit 3 ESP-3 2 PM control 1073 Unit 3 Stack-3 3 Sam pling Port next 1073 Unit 3 Unit 3-Stack 4 Stack 1073 Unit 4 4 1 Unit 1073 Unit 4 ESP Inlet-4 2 Sam pling Port next 1073 Unit 4 ESP-4 3 PM control 1073 Unit 4 Stack-4 4 Sam pling Port next 1073 Unit 4 Unit 4-Stack 5 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1073 Unit 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.16 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 40 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1073 Unit 1 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.16 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 40 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1073 Unit 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

2745 pound per hour (lb/hr) 12023 1073 Unit 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

235 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1202 1073 Unit 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

141 pound per hour (lb/hr) 618 1073 Unit 2 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.16 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 40 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1073 Unit 2 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.16 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 40 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1073 Unit 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

2745 pound per hour (lb/hr) 12023 1073 Unit 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

234 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1202 1073 Unit 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

141 pound per hour (lb/hr) 618 1073 Unit 3 PM (Filterable) State - Permit to Contruct

0.06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1073 Unit 3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

495.9 pound per hour (lb/hr)

24 hours 5 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1073 Unit 3 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.46 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1073 Unit 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

152.75 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 0.25 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1073 Unit 4 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.16 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1073 Unit 4 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1289.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

24 hours 5 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim its 1 and 2 are 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensable for both units (U1 & U2).See Note #1.18 for Limit 3. No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim its 1 and 2 are 3 run average - PM is Total PM10 = PM10 (Filterable) + PM10 Condensable for both units (U1 & U2).See Note 1.19 for PM 10 3rd Limit. No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency Lim it 2 Measurements is Tons/Year for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.21 for 3rd Limit for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.22 for 4th Limit for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A Lim it 1 is a 3 run average for both units (U1 & U2).Limit 2 Measurements is Tons/Hr for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A Lim it 1 is a 3 run average for both units (U1 & U2).Limit 2 Measurements is Tons/Hr for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim its 1 and 2 are 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensable for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.18 for Limit 3. No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim its 1 and 2 are 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensable for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.19 for PM 10 3rd Limit. No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency Lim it 2 Measurements is Tons/Hr for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.21 for 3rd Limit for both units (U1 & U2).See Note # 1.22 for 4th Limit for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A Lim it 1 is a 3 run average for both units (U1 & U2).Limit 2 Measurements is Tons/Hr for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A Lim it 1 is a 3 run average for both units (U1 & U2).Limit 2 Measurements is Tons/Hr for a 12 month rolling total for both units (U1 & U2). No Stack Test N/A pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) This is Total PM = PM (filterable) + PM (condensable) on a 3 run average No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency 2 hours Lim it 2 - Coal only See Note # 1.23 for Limit 3See Note # 1.24 for Limit 4 No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75 No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75 30 days Lim it 3 See Note # 1.26 No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 60 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) This is Total PM = PM (filterable) + PM (condensable) on a 3 run average No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency 2 hours Lim it 2 is burning coal only.See Notes 1.27 & 1.28 for Limits 3 & 4. No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting ESP Agency

O & M Plan ESP Agency

O & M Plan N/A N/A N/A ESP Agency

O & M Plan ESP Agency

O & M Plan N/A N/A N/A ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 38configuration_pollutants1

The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to LCPHD. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 39control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 40control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 41control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 42control_technologies

feed_rate_units

Page 43control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 44control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 45control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 46control_costs

CBI

Page 47misc_controls

facility _id misc_control_id

control_description

Page 48misc_control_configurations

facility _id misc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 49fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 1073 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 10258.53 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1073 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 10278.42 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1073 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 10258.86 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1073 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 30944.56 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1073 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 31205.01 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1073 200912-Coal

12/1/2009 10243.88 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell

Page 50fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Page 51fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1073 200904-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200904-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200904-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200904-Coal

Unit 4 1073 200906-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200906-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200906-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200906-Coal

Unit 4 1073 200907-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200907-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200907-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200907-Coal

Unit 4 1073 200910-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200910-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200910-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200910-Coal

Unit 4 1073 200911-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200911-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200911-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200911-Coal

Unit 4 1073 200912-Coal

Unit 1 1073 200912-Coal

Unit 2 1073 200912-Coal

Unit 3 1073 200912-Coal

Unit 4

Page 52fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 53fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

analysis_copies

Page 56fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 57test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

compliance Unit 1 Carbon Monoxide testing performed on the common stack of units 1 and 2 while unit 2 was off-line 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 No No 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

other diagnostic Unit 1 HCI testing completed completed on the common stack of units 1 and 2 while unit 2 was off-line 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 No No 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

compliance Unit 1 Lead testing performed on the common stack of units 1 and 2 while unit 2 was off-line 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 No No 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

other Diagnostic Metals testing completed for Unit 1 on the common stack of units 1 and 2 while unit 2 as off-line 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 No No 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

compliance NOx testing completed for Unit 1 on CS-U1U2 Stack, while unit 2 as off-line 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 No No 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

other Diagnostic Particulate testing completed for Unit 1 on CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 2 was off-line 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 No No 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

compliance Particulate testing completed for Unit 1 on CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 2 was off-line 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 No No 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

compliance SO2 testing completed for Unit 1 on CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 2 was off-line 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 No No 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 No No 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

other Diagnostic Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 while unit 1 was off-line 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 No No 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

compliance Lead Testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 No No 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

other Diagnostic Metals testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 No No 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

compliance NOx testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 No No 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

other Diagnostic Particulate testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 No No 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

compliance Particulate testing on unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 No No 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

compliance SO2 testing on Unit 2 at CS-U1U2 Stack while unit 1 was off-line 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 No No 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

other Diagnostic Carbon Monoxide testing on Unit 3 at Stack ######## ######## No No 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

other Diagnostic Mercury testing at Uint 3 Stack. 9/20/2006 9/20/2006 No No 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

other Diagnostic Mercury testing on Unit 4 Stack ######## ######## No No 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

other Diagnostic Metals testing at Unit 4 ESP Inlet 8/22/2006 8/22/2006 No No 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

other Diagnostic Metals testing on Unit 4 Stack 8/22/2006 8/22/2006 No No

Page 58test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Page 59test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

Unit 1 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

Unit 1 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

Unit 1 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

Unit 1 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

Unit 1 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

Unit 1 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

Unit 1 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

Unit 1 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

Unit 2 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

Unit 2 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

Unit 2 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

Unit 2 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

Unit 2 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

Unit 2 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

Unit 2 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

Unit 2 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Unit 3 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Unit 4 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

Unit 4 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Unit 4

Page 60test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

Subbitum inous 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

Subbitum inous 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

Subbitum inous 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Subbitum inous 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Subbitum inous 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Subbitum inous 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

Subbitum inous 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Subbitum inous

Page 61test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 62cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 63cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 64test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

CS-U1U2 No No 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Stack-3 No No 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

No No 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 No No 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 No No 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 No No

Page 65test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 66sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

CS-U1U2 average 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 1.47 9.8 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

CS-U1U2 average 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 1.33 11.5 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

CS-U1U2 average 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 1.41 9.8 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 1.36 11.5 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

CS-U1U2 average 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 1.43 9.8 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

CS-U1U2 average 4/26/2005 4/26/2005 1.31 11.5 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 average 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 1.38 9.5 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

CS-U1U2 average 9/1/2009 9/1/2009 1.45 9.8 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

CS-U1U2 average 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 1.66 10.4 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

CS-U1U2 average 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 1.52 9.9 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

CS-U1U2 average 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 1.59 10.4 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 1.55 9.9 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

CS-U1U2 average 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 1.62 10.4 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

CS-U1U2 average 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 1.49 9.9 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 average 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 1.57 9.8 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

CS-U1U2 average 9/2/2009 9/2/2009 1.64 10.4 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Stack-3 average ######## ######## 1.71 12 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

average 9/20/2006 9/20/2006 1.68 8.5 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average ######## ######## 1.77 11 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average 8/22/2006 8/22/2006 1.75 12.6 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average 8/22/2006 8/22/2006 1.73 11.1

Page 67sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 69047 dscfm 68 1 9 10.9 1.48 63318 dscfm 68 1 7.4 12.5 1.34 69047 dscfm 68 1 9 10.9 1.42 63318 dscfm 68 1 7.4 12.5 1.37 69047 dscfm 68 1 9 10.9 1.44 63318 dscfm 68 1 7.4 12.5 1.32 70823 dscfm 68 1 8.9 10.9 1.39 69047 dscfm 68 1 9 10.9 1.46 78010 dscfm 68 1 8.9 11 1.67 71784 dscfm 68 1 7.3 12.5 1.53 78010 dscfm 68 1 8.9 11 1.61 71784 dscfm 68 1 7.3 12.5 1.56 78010 dscfm 68 1 8.9 11 1.63 71784 dscfm 68 1 7.3 12.5 1.51 87409 dscfm 68 1 9 10.9 1.58 78010 dscfm 68 1 8.9 11 1.65 118998 dscfm 68 1 5.2 14.6 1.72 120353 dscfm 68 1 6 14 1.69 324610 dscfm 68 1 8 13 1.78 316017 dscfm 68 1 5.8 13.1 1.76 336270 dscfm 68 1 6.4 11.7 1.74

Page 68sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.98 10 Subbitum inous 1.47 7.12 11929 0.97 26 Subbitum inous 1.33 7.51 11808 0.98 12 Subbitum inous 1.41 7.12 11929 0.97 29 Subbitum inous 1.36 7.51 11808 0.98 7E Subbitum inous 1.43 7.12 11929 0.97 5/202 Subbitum inous 1.31 7.51 11808 0.98 OTM027/202 Subbitum inous 1.38 7.68 11917 0.98 6C Subbitum inous 1.45 7.12 11929 0.98 10 Subbitum inous 1.66 8.32 11859 0.97 26 Subbitum inous 1.52 7.43 11777 0.98 12 Subbitum inous 1.59 8.32 11859 0.97 29 Subbitum inous 1.55 7.43 11777 0.98 7E Subbitum inous 1.62 8.32 11859 0.97 5/202 Subbitum inous 1.49 7.73 11777 0.97 OTM027/202 Subbitum inous 1.57 7.57 11900 0.98 6C Subbitum inous 1.64 8.32 11859 0.96 10 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 1.68 4.89 12756 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 1.77 6.46 12059 0.95 29 Subbitum inous 1.75 8.01 11601 0.98 29 Subbitum inous 1.73 8.01 11601

Page 69sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.42 0.46 0.44 0.56 0.62 0.56 0.62 0.56 0.62 0.46 0.56

0.43 0.4 0.38 0.38

Page 70sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Arsenic (As) 6.02 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Beryllium(Be) 0.098 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Cadmium (Cd) 1.361 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Chromium (Cr) 2.126 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 7.163 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Manganese (Mn) 5.301 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 2.696 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Nickel (Ni) 6.734 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Selenium(Se) 2.312 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0005 FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 average PM (Condensable) 0.016 FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0003 FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20090901

CS-U1U2 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0003 FALSE 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 4.49 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 135.7 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 230.8 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 100.5 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

CS-U1U2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0129 FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20050428

CS-U1U2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0219 FALSE 1073 PC2-HCI-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 0.38 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

CS-U1U2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0107 FALSE 1073 PC1-PM-20050426

CS-U1U2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0092 FALSE 1073 PC1-HCI-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 0.42 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Arsenic (As) 10.683 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Beryllium(Be) 0.168 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Cadmium (Cd) 4.069 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Chromium (Cr) 2.793 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 12.199 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Manganese (Mn) 5.599 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 1.703 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Nickel (Ni) 8.881 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Selenium(Se) 4.546 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0026 FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0074 FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0013 FALSE 1073 PC2-PM-20090902

CS-U1U2 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0007 FALSE 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 12.93 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 130.3 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 231.6 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 247.5 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.48 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.34 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.07 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC3-Hg-20060920

Unit 3-Stack

average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.07 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC3-CO-20071120

Stack-3 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 2.94 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Arsenic (As) 4.748 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Beryllium(Be) 0.477 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Cadmium (Cd) 0.989 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Chromium (Cr) 20.06 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Lead (Pb) 11.488 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Manganese (Mn) 27.497 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE

Page 71sampling_run_pollutants1

1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.709 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Nickel (Ni) 6.435 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Selenium(Se) 9.526 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Arsenic (As) 78.539 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Beryllium(Be) 11.851 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Cadmium (Cd) 8.125 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Chromium (Cr) 515.784 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Lead (Pb) 153.415 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Manganese (Mn) 532.106 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.12 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Nickel (Ni) 134.451 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Selenium(Se) 74.594 microgram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.786 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 3.305 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.432 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.049 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE

Page 72sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 0.00143 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.68E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.32E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 9.2E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000321 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.28E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000505 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 0.000002 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0017 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.76E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00126 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.01E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00064 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.54E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0016 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.35E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000548 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.17E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.319 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0013 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0005 grains/dscf) 9.727 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0388 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0016 grains/dscf) 0.193 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0003 grains/dscf) 0.193 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0003 grains/dscf) 0.0012 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.83E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 67.1 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.279 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 158.72 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.66 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 30.25 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.126 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 7.88 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0275 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0129 grains/dscf) 13.369 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0467 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0219 grains/dscf) 0.153 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0005 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE See Note # 1.54 5.793 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.023 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0107 grains/dscf) 4.949 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0198 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0092 grains/dscf) 0.149 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0006 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE See note 1.35 0.00286 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 9.97E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.49E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.57E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0011 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.8E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000748 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.61E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00327 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.14E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00149 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.22E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000458 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.59E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00283 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.29E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00122 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.25E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.946 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0064 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0026 grains/dscf) 5.517 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0182 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0074 grains/dscf) 0.955 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0031 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0013 grains/dscf) 0.519 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0007 grains/dscf) 0.0038 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.39E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 72.83 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.268 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 179.96 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.661 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 84.13 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.308 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00022 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.15E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00015 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.74E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00003 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.97E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000032 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 6.23E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.52 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.003 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00598 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.23E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0006 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.25E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00124 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.81E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0252 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.79E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0145 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.02E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0346 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.45E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

0.00468 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.3E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00811 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.73E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.012 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.49E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0928 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.72E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.014 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.01E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0096 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.95E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.608 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000441 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.181 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000131 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.628 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000455 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0037 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.67E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.159 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000115 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0882 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000638 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00582 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.7E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00402 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.25E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00174 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.41E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 5.92E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 4.79E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1

run_pollutant_comment

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0005 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0016 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0003 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0003 grains/dscf)

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0129 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0219 grains/dscf) See Note # 1.54 Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0107 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0092 grains/dscf) See note 1.35

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0026 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0074 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0013 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0007 grains/dscf)

Page 75sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1073 PC1-CO-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 2 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Lead-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 2 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Arsenic (As) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Chromium (Cr) 6 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Manganese (Mn) 15 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.09 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-Metals-20050426

CS-U1U2 average Nickel (Ni) 5 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-NOX-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 2 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC1-SO2-20090901

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 2 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-CO-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 3 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Lead-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 3 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Arsenic (As) 2 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Chromium (Cr) 5 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 3 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Manganese (Mn) 15 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.08 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-Metals-20050428

CS-U1U2 average Nickel (Ni) 5 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-NOx-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 3 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC2-SO2-20090902

CS-U1U2 average Lead (Pb) 3 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Hg-20071016

Stack-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Arsenic (As) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Chromium (Cr) 11 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Lead (Pb) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Manganese (Mn) 16 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Inlet-Metals-20060822

ESP Inlet-4 average Nickel (Ni) 9 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Arsenic (As) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Chromium (Cr) 11 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Lead (Pb) 4 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Manganese (Mn) 16 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1073 PC4-Metals-20060822

Stack-4 average Nickel (Ni) 9 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 76sampling_run_fuel

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 77