alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 262 

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 

Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 

dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study 

and submit to Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten 

through third grade. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Early Detection of 

5 Dyslexia in Children Act of 2007’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 262 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION 

2 ON IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF 

3 CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDER4 GARTEN THROUGH THIRD GRADE. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Education, in con6 sultation with the National Academy of Sciences, shall 

7 conduct a study on methods for identifying and treating 

8 children with dyslexia in kindergarten through third 

9 grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall con10 sider— 

11 (1) whether there is a biological basis for dys12 lexia; 

13 (2) whether dyslexia is caused by— 

14 (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 

15 prevents an individual from breaking down 

16 written words into component sounds; 

17 (B) post-natal experience, including inad18 equate instruction; or 

19 (C) a combination thereof; and 

20 (3) the cost of implementing a program on a 

21 nationwide basis to identify and treat children with 

22 dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

23 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 262 IH

1 shall prepare and submit to Congress a report containing 

2 the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
RE: Revised package 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Higgins, Cortney 

 11/16/2012 10:46 AM 

 Cc: Peter Tsirigotis, RobertJ Wayland 

EO12866 redline 110612 vs 111612.docx 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/16/2012 10:41 AM 

Subject: RE: Revised package 

Hi Bob, 

Can you send the redline as a word document? 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

 

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 

10:28 AM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov; tsirigotis.peter@epa.gov 

Subject: Fw: Revised package 

Importance: High 

 

Cortney - 

Attached below are three (3) files: 

(1) 75% CPMS Memo 

(2) Revised preamble/regulatory text 
(3) Redline of preamble/regulatory text off of what was originally 

submitted to you via ROCIS versus the current state of the package. 

Please let me know if you have any further edits/concerns, and we'll work 

to get the addresses asap. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/16/2012 10:26 AM 

----- 

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Pamela Garrett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/16/2012 10:20 AM 

Subject: Revised package 

(See attached file: 75 percent CPMS operating limit_111612.pdf)(See 

attached file: 

EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Proposal_20121116.pdf)(See 

attached 

file: EO12866 redline 110612 vs 111612.pdf) 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 
FAX: 919-541-5450
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00427-CR, 04-19-00428-CR & 04-19-00429-CR

The State of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Raymond Soto,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR9018, 2018CR9019 & 2018CR9020

The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State has filed a first amended motion to consolidate appeal numbers 04-19-00427-

CR, 04-19-00428-CR, and 04-19-00429-CR.1 Due to the similarities between the cases, this 

court has determined that the cases should be consolidated for briefing and argument. It is 

therefore ORDERED that the first amended motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The parties 

shall file all motions, briefs, and other documents as if the three appeals were one case, but shall 

include all three appeal numbers in the style of the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3(a). The records 

for the three appeals shall remain separated. In the event oral argument is granted, all three 

appeals shall be argued together, as a single appeal, and the total time limit for each side at oral 

argument shall equal the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court may dispose of all 

three appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 

1 The State’s original motion to consolidate is MOOT.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert E. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 10, 2009 |                    | /s/ Robert E. Quinn |
|--------|------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|   |                   | Robert E. Quinn         |
|   |                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
§ 1016.13 Exception to opt out requirements for service providers and joint marketing. ( a ) *General rule.* ( 1 ) The opt out requirements in §§ 1016.7 and 1016.10 of this part do not apply when you provide nonpublic personal information to a nonaffiliated third party to perform services for you or functions on your behalf, if you: ( i ) Provide the initial notice in accordance with § 1016.4; and
( ii ) Enter into a contractual agreement with the third party that prohibits the third party from disclosing or using the information other than to carry out the purposes for which you disclosed the information, including use under an exception in § 1016.14 or § 1016.15 in the ordinary course of business to carry out those purposes.
( 2 ) *Example.* If you disclose nonpublic personal information under this section to a financial institution with which you perform joint marketing, your contractual agreement with that institution meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section if it prohibits the institution from disclosing or using the nonpublic personal information except as necessary to carry out the joint marketing or under an exception in § 1016.14 or § 1016.15 in the ordinary course of business to carry out that joint marketing.
( b ) *Service may include joint marketing.* The services a nonaffiliated third party performs for you under paragraph (a) of this section may include marketing of your own products or services or marketing of financial products or services offered pursuant to joint agreements between you and one or more financial institutions.
( c ) *Definition of joint agreement.* For purposes of this section, joint agreement means a written contract pursuant to which you and one or more financial institutions jointly offer, endorse, or sponsor a financial product or service.
§ 18a.4 Duties of the Director, Contract Compliance Service. Upon referral by the Chief Medical Director or the Under Secretary for Benefits, the Director, Contract Compliance Service will: ( a ) Investigate and process all complaints arising under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
( b ) Conduct periodic audits, reviews and evaluations;
( c ) Attempt to secure voluntary compliance by conciliatory or other informal means whenever investigation of a complaint, compliance review, failure to furnish assurance of compliance, or other source indicates noncompliance with Title VI; and
report to the Chief Medical Director or the Under Secretary for Benefits, whichever is appropriate, the results of investigations, audits, reviews and evaluations or the results of attempts to secure voluntary compliance. [35 FR 10759, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
SCALE 1:24,000

SPRINGFIELD NORTH QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Springfield North Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1958.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Geology mapped by F.D. Larsen in 1976 (unpublished). Some

postglacial units mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 19 of 24)

(M

O

U

N

T

TO

M)

(LU

DLO

W)

(MOUNT HOLYOKE)

(SPRINGFIELD SOUTH)

72°30'0"W

72°30'0"W

72°37'30"W

72°37'30"W

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

42°7'30"N

42°7'30"N

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor-operated valveperformance issues [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/96-48

Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000774139
 
Notice | SupplementNo 1
 
April 6, 2020
42361.

#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALKER.

Jordan, Judge.

This is the second appeal to this court by the insurer on an action by the insured seeking recovery under a homeowner’s insurance policy for the loss by theft of personal property from a house trailer. On the first appeal this court determined that the pleadings and evidence conclusively showed that the house trailer was a dwelling owned by the insured separate and distinct from the dwelling covered by the policy, that the trailer (as a dwelling owned by an insured in which he was not temporarily residing) and its contents were not covered by the insurance policy, and that under these circumstances a verdict for the insurer was demanded as a matter of law. *Allstate Ins. Co. v. Walker,*111 Ga. App. 120, 123 (140 SE2d 910). Thereafter the insured twice amended his petition, alleging that when he purchased the house trailer he inquired of an agent of the insurer as to what coverage was required to insure him against loss by theft from the trailer, that through the agent and through the insurer’s underwriting office he was advised that the trailer and contents were covered by the homeowner’s insurance policy, and that the insurer was therefore estopped to deny coverage. The insurer moved to strike the amendments and to dismiss the petition, renewed its general and special demurrers, and demurred specially to the amendments. The trial judge sustained one special demurrer and overruled the motion and other demurrers. The insurer appeals from the overruling of the motions and demurrers. *Held:*

*733Argued October 5, 1966

Decided December 2, 1966.

*Gambrell, Harlan, Russell & Moye, Edward W. Killorin, W. Wray Eckl,*for appellant.

1. “ ‘The doctrines of implied waiver and of estoppel, based upon the conduct or action of the insurer, are not available to bring within the coverage of a policy risks not covered by its items, or risks expressly excluded therefrom. . .’ 29 AmJur 690, Insurance, § 903; *Quillian v. Equitable Life Assur. Society,*61 Ga. App. 138 (3) (6 SE2d 108); *Life & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Williams,*200 Ga. 273 (36 SE2d 753, 161 ALR 686); *Doubrly v. Carolina Life Ins. Co.,*58 Ga. App. 178 (198 SE 76); *Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Carter,*55 Ga. App. 622 (191 SE 153), affirmed in 185 Ga. 746 (196 SE 415).” *Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Ramsey,*98 Ga. App. 732, 733 (2) (106 SE2d 820). Also see *Wise v. Royal Ins. Co.,*32 Ga. App. 719 (2) (124 SE 556), and *Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Garrett,*60 Ga. App. 816 (5 SE2d 276).

2. As the petition as finally amended fails to disclose any right of recovery except in a manner not available to the insured, by application of the doctrine of estoppel to the representations of the insurer through its agents that coverage included a house trailer and its contents, i.e., a dwelling and its contents otherwise not within the terms of the policy, the trial judge erred in overruling the renewed general demurrer to the petition. This being controlling, it is unnecessary to consider the other enumerated errors.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

          - 48 CFR Part 201

### CFR Correction

In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 2 (Parts 201 to 299), revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 10, in section 201.304, reinstate paragraph (6) to read as follows:

201.304

* * * * *

                        (6) The Director of Defense Procurement publishes changes to the DFARS in the                         **Federal Register**                         and electronically via the World Wide Web. Each change includes an effective date. Unless guidance accompanying a change states otherwise, contracting officers must include any new or revised clauses, provisions, or forms in solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the change.                    

[FR Doc. E9-23476 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

 

Decided: September 12, 2016

S16Y0976. IN THE MATTER OF NATHAN E. HARDWICK, IV.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the State Bar’s request to

temporarily suspend Respondent Nathan E. Hardwick, IV (State Bar No.

325686) until further order of this Court. The Bar states that Hardwick has been

charged withmultiple feloniesinCriminal CaseNo. 1:16-CR-00065-ELR-CMS

in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and that,

as a condition of his bond, Hardwick has been ordered not to practice law. The

Bar represents that Hardwick has no objection to this request.

Based on the present record, this Court agrees that the Bar’s unopposed

request should be granted. See In the Matter of Smith, 297 Ga. 46 (771 SE2d

901) (2015); In the Matter of Swank, 288 Ga. 479 (704 SE2d 807) (2011).

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Nathan E. Hardwick, IV be suspended from

the practice of law in this State during the pendency of the criminal charges
against him and until further order of this Court. Hardwick is hereby directed to

notify the State Bar’s Office of General Counsel in writing within seven days

of any final disposition of the criminal charges in the district court. Hardwick

is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Suspension until further order of the Court. All the Justices concur.

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00002-CR

IN RE Corey KING

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 15, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 2, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR7910, styled The State of Texas v. Corey King, pending in the 144th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.
DAVID M. ENDERSBEE DIRECT DIAL (202) 973-7935

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com

ZUCKERT SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

888 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006-3309

Telephone [202] 298-8660 Fax [202] 342-0683

www.zsrlaw.com

July 12, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Robert Finamore

Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji Airways

Docket DOT-OST-2005-21868

Dear Mr. Finamore:

On July 11, 2013, Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji Airways filed an Application for 

Renewal of Exemption in the above-referenced docket.

We have completed polling all parties on the service list, and no party has stated any 

objection to the application or to the request for expedited treatment. We respectfully request 

that the Department proceed to grant the requested authority as soon as possible.

A copy of this letter will be submitted to the docket and to all persons on the service list.

Sincerely,

David M. Endersbee

Counsel for Air Pacific Limited d/b/a Fiji 

Airways

cc: service list
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                         1,544
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                   22
<INVENTORY>                                    55,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60,203
<PP&E>                                         18,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 71,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,559
<BONDS>                                        344
<COMMON>                                       44
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   71,456
<SALES>                                        41,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,580
<CGS>                                          32,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  40,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (29)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                   497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            730
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
        


</TABLE>
§ 1008.301 Scope of this subpart. This subpart establishes minimum requirements that apply to administration of the NMLSR by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors or by the Bureau. The NMLSR must accomplish the following objectives: ( a ) Provide uniform license applications and reporting requirements for state-licensed loan originators.
( b ) Provide a comprehensive licensing and supervisory database.
( c ) Aggregate and improve the flow of information to and between regulators.
( d ) Provide increased accountability and tracking of loan originators.
( e ) Streamline the licensing process and reduce the regulatory burden.
( f ) Enhance consumer protections and support anti-fraud measures.
( g ) Provide consumers with easily accessible information, offered at no charge, utilizing electronic media, including the Internet, regarding the employment history of, and publicly adjudicated disciplinary and enforcement actions against, loan originators.
( h ) Establish a means by which residential mortgage loan originators would, to the greatest extent possible, be required to act in the best interests of the consumer.
( i ) Facilitate responsible behavior in the mortgage marketplace and provide comprehensive training and examination requirements related to mortgage lending.
( j ) Facilitate the collection and disbursement of consumer complaints on behalf of state and Federal mortgage regulators.