alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021348EN.01000201.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 August 2021

(2021/C 348/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1761 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85703 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2345 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0796 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,563 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 350,87 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5827 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9340 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,8809 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6220 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4914 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1619 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6927 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5888 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 375,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5356 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6195 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4886 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 968,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9279 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,754 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,0549 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,406 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1692 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,9686 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,7010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1761

JPY

Japanese yen

129,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85703

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2345

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0796

ISK

Iceland króna

149,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,563

HUF

Hungarian forint

350,87

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5827

RON

Romanian leu

4,9340

TRY

Turkish lira

9,8809

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6220

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4914

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1619

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6927

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5888

KRW

South Korean won

1 375,78

ZAR

South African rand

17,5356

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6195

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4886

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 968,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9279

PHP

Philippine peso

58,754

RUB

Russian rouble

87,0549

THB

Thai baht

38,406

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1692

MXN

Mexican peso

23,9686

INR

Indian rupee

86,7010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
### Supreme Court ofthe United States Office ofthe Clerk 

### Washington, DC 20543-0001 November 30, 2015 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202)479-3011 Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Cecil Ray Garcia v. Texas No. 14-9369 (Your No. WR-61,850-03) Dear Clerk: 

### The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for rehearing is denied. Sincerely,
Scott S. Harris, Clerk 

# RECEIVED »N AIJS 

# COURTOFCR1«ALAPPEALS DEC 16 2015 

# AbelAcosta, Clerk
#### § 1251.4 Submission of information.

The Director may issue guidance, orders, or notices on compliance with section 1337 and this part by the Enterprises, which may include information submissions by the Enterprises.
SERVED: August 13, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF MEYERLABORATORY, INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0618
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013-GL-70-0054) has been assignedto Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. 

## All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East DevonAvenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 Terry Oles, Vice President ofOperations MeyerLaboratory, Inc., Respondent 

### 2401 NW Jefferson Street Blue Springs, MO 64015 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0618 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.



### -2-
§ 78.40 Selection of grantees for renewal of suicide prevention services grants. VA will use the following process to select grantees applying for renewal of suicide prevention services grants: ( a ) So long as the grantee continues to meet the threshold requirements set forth in § 78.20, VA will score the grantee using the scoring criteria set forth in § 78.35.
( b ) VA will rank those grantees who receive at least the minimum amount of total points and points per category set forth in the NOFO. The grantees will be ranked in order from highest to lowest scores.
( c ) VA will use the grantee's ranking as the basis for selection for funding. VA will fund the highest-ranked grantees for which funding is available.
( d ) At its discretion, VA may award any non-renewed funds to an applicant or existing grantee. If VA chooses to award non-renewed funds to an applicant or existing grantee, funds will be awarded as follows: ( 1 ) VA will first offer to award the non-renewed funds to the applicant or grantee with the highest grant score under the relevant NOFO that applies for, or is awarded a renewal grant in, the same area as, or a proximate area to, the affected area if available. Such applicant or grantee must have the capacity and agree to provide prompt services to the affected area. Under this section, the relevant NOFO is the most recently published NOFO which covers the affected area, or for multi-year grant awards, the NOFO for which the grantee, who is offered the additional funds, received the multi-year award.
( 2 ) If the first such applicant or grantee offered the non-renewed funds refuses the funds, VA will offer to award the funds to the next highest-ranked such applicant or grantee, per the criteria in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, and continue on in rank order until the non-renewed funds are awarded.
( e ) If an applicant would have been selected but for a procedural error committed by VA, VA may select that applicant for funding when sufficient funds become available if there is no material change in the information that would have resulted in the applicant's selection. A new application will not be required for this purpose.
§ 1217.8 Statute of limitations. The statute of limitations for commencing a hearing under this part shall be tolled: ( a ) If the hearing is commenced in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(d)(2)(B) within 6 years after the date on which the claim or statement is made; or
( b ) If the parties agree to such tolling.
EXHIBIT 32.1


            CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly
Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the Company)  on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Saxe, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.


/s/  Robert L. Saxe
     Robert L. Saxe
     Chairman and Chief
     Executive Officer
     October 19, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2582 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2582

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 qualified long-term care services in computing adjusted gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 qualified long-term care services in computing adjusted gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Qualified Long-term Care Fairness 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES ALLOWED IN 
              COMPUTING ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining adjusted gross income) is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (21) the following new paragraph:
            ``(22) Qualified long-term care services.--The deductions 
        that would be allowed by section 213, notwithstanding the 
        requirement in subsection (a) of such section that a deduction 
        only be allowed to the extent that expenses paid for medical 
        care exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income, which consist 
        of amounts paid for qualified long-term care services and 
        qualified long-term care insurance contracts.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2590 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2590

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission to 
  the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are the 
 spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2003

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission to 
  the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are the 
 spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF CERTAIN ``B'' AND ``F'' VISA NONIMMIGRANTS WHO 
              ARE SPOUSES OR CHILDREN OF UNITED STATES PERMANENT 
              RESIDENT ALIENS.

    Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the subsection (p) added by section 
        1505(f) of Public Law 106-386 (114 Stat. 1526) as a subsection 
        (s); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(t)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no alien--
            ``(A) who is--
                    ``(i) the spouse or child of an alien lawfully 
                admitted for permanent residence to the United States; 
                and
                    ``(ii) not eligible to enter the United States as 
                an immigrant except by reason of being such a spouse or 
                child; and
            ``(B) who seeks admission to the United States for purposes 
        of visiting the permanent resident spouse or parent or for 
        studying in the United States; and
            ``(C) who is otherwise qualified;
may be denied issuance of a visa, or may be denied admission to the 
United States, as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 
101(a)(15)(B) who is coming to the United States temporarily for 
pleasure or as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F).
    ``(2) Whenever an alien described in paragraph (1) seeks admission 
to the United States as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 
101(a)(15)(B) who is coming temporarily for pleasure or as a 
nonimmigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F), the fact that a 
petition has been filed on the alien's behalf for classification of the 
alien as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence shall not 
constitute evidence of the alien's intention to abandon his or her 
foreign residence.''.
                                 <all>
```
SIXTHCAI INC
                          4300 N. MILLER RD. SUITE 120
                         SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85251-3620

February 7, 2000

Kenneth R. Lew
4300 North Miller Rd. Suite 120
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

     Re:  Lock-Up Agreement with Sixthcai, Inc.

Gentlemen,

     In consideration of the sale to the holder by Sixthcai,  Inc., (Company) of
its Common Stock ($.0001 par value), the undersigned holder warrants,  covenants
and agrees for the benefit of the Company not to sell, offer to sell, solicit an
offer to buy, contract to sell, make any short sale,  pledge,  grant,  grant any
option to purchase,  or  otherwise  transfer or dispose of, any shares of Common
stock, or any securities  convertible  into or exercisable or  exchangeable  for
Common Stock,  owned directly or beneficially by the undersigned or with respect
to which the undersigned has the power of disposition, except in connection with
or following a completed merger or acquisition by the Company and the Company is
no longer  classified as a blank check company  pursuant to Section 7 (b) (3) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     An attempt to sell, transfer or any type of disposition of the shares shall
be a violation of this letter  agreement and shall be  ineffective  and null and
void.

     In  furtherance  of the  foregoing,  the holder agrees to; (1) delivery his
shares to the  Company  for safe  keeping;  (2) allow the  Company to advise its
Transfer Agent not to transfer said  securities and (3) authorize the company to
deliver a copy of this  Agreement to the  transfer  agent with  instructions  to
decline to make any transfer of securities if such transfer  would  constitute a
violation or breach of this Agreement.

     This  Agreement  shall be  binding  upon the  holder,  its  agents,  heirs,
successors, assignees and beneficiaries.
<PAGE>
     A waiver of the terms and  conditions of this  agreement must be in writing
and executed by the proper officer of the Company and the holder.

     If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this  Agreement,  the holder
agrees  that  there is no  adequate  remedy at law and said  breach  will  cause
irreparable damage. Accordingly,  the holder agrees that the Company is entitled
to the issuance of an immediate injunction without notice to restrain the breach
or  threatened  breach.  This remedy is not exclusive and the holder agrees that
the  Company  and third  party  beneficiaries  shall be  entitled  to seek other
remedies including a claim for other remedies, including money damages.


THE HOLDER


/s/ Kenneth R. Lew
------------------
Kenneth R. Lew                         Constituting 30,000 shares certificate(s)

                                                             #
                                                              ------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4356 Tax, special assessment and other liens.

Tax liens, special assessment liens, and ground rents shall be disregarded with respect to any requirement that loans shall be secured by a lien of specified dignity. With the prior approval of the Secretary, Under Secretary for Benefits, or Executive Director, Loan Guaranty Service, liens retained by nongovernmental entities to secure assessments or charges for municipal type services and facilities clearly within the public purpose doctrine may be disregarded. In determining whether a loan for the purchase or construction of a home is secured by a first lien the Secretary may also disregard a superior lien created by a duly recorded covenant running with the realty in favor of a private entity to secure an obligation to such entity for the homeowner's share of the costs of the management, operation, or maintenance of property, services or programs within and for the benefit of the development or community in which the veteran's realty is located, if the Secretary determines that the interests of the veteran-borrower and of the Government will not be prejudiced by the operation of such covenant. In respect to any such superior lien to be created after June 6, 1969, the Secretary's determination must have been made prior to the recordation of the covenant.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(d)(3))
~c~O STq1.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX 4~. ~.

~ ~oi~ 75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

DEC 1.8 2Ut4

David C. Bloomfield, Plant Manager

Arizona Public Service Company

Four Corners Electric Power Station

P.O. Box 355

Fruitland, NM 874 16-0355

Re: Final Permit Decision for Four Corners Power Plant SCR Project, PSD Permit NN 14-01 and

Minor NSR Permit T-0002-NN

Dear Mr. Bloomfield:

In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended (42 U.S.C 7401 et seq.), the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) has reviewed your application for a CAA Prevention of Significant

Deterioration (PSD) permit and Tribal Minor New Source Review permit authorizing the construction and

operation of Selective Catalytic Reductions systems on Units 4 and 5 at the Four Corners Power Plant.

Enclosed please find your signed permit and our notice announcing EPA’s final permit decision. Your permit

becomes effective 30 days after the service of notice of this final permit decision, unless a petition for appeal

is properly and timely filed with EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). In the event a petition for

review is filed, construction of the FCPP SCR Project cannot begin under this permit until resolution of the

EAB petition(s). The final permit, Response to Comments document and other key documents relevant to the

final permit are also available through a link at our website, www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/r9-permitsissued.html#psd, or at www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0545).

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Lisa Beckham at 415- 972-3811 or

beckham.lisa@epa.gov.

Sincerely,

~~ordan~

Director, Air Division

Enclosures

cc: Mark Hajduk, APS (via email)

Stephen Etsitty, Navajo Nation EPA

Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA (via email)

Printed on Recycled Paper
#### § 11.99 Identification.

Before a loan is made on an adjusted service certificate, the person applying therefor will be identified as the person entitled to the certificate offered as security. Such identification will be made in accordance with § 11.114.

[19 FR 5086, Aug. 12, 1954]
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2671 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 

North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘C. Clyde 

Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 2671 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse at 301 North Miami 

3 Avenue, Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated 

4 as the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

8 States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

9 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United 

10 States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 1041.7 Identification of unfair and abusive practice.

It is an unfair and abusive practice for a lender to make attempts to withdraw payment from consumers' accounts in connection with a covered loan after the lender's second consecutive attempts to withdraw payments from the accounts from which the prior attempts were made have failed due to a lack of sufficient funds, unless the lender obtains the consumers' new and specific authorization to make further withdrawals from the accounts.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6318

KENT BRUMMELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General

of the State of Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:07-cv-02470-WDQ)

Submitted: September 12, 2008 Decided: November 7, 2008

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kent Brummell, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kent Brummell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brummell has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED