alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofMay 26, 2021, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period thatis the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2023By: /s/ Vikas GuptaName: Vikas GuptaTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2023**
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-21-00067-CR

JOHN CHARLES DENELSBECK, III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Delta County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7735

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

ORDER

Our review of the Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains un-redacted 

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Unless a court orders otherwise, “an electronic or paper filing with 

the court . . . must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b). Sensitive data includes 

“the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP.

P. 9.10(a)(3). The Appellant’s brief includes the real names of child victims mentioned during 

trial. 

“Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or 

character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been 

redacted.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d). To protect the identity of the child victims, we hereby strike 

the Appellant’s brief and order that it be redacted in accordance with Section 9.10 of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant’s properly redacted brief be

refiled on or before January 10, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

BY THE COURT

Date: January 6, 2022
§ 1070.60 Exempt records. ( a ) *Exempt systems of records.* Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the CFPB exempts the systems of records listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G)-(H), and (f), and §§ 1070.53 through 1070.59, to the extent that such systems of records contain investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes, provided, however, that if any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit to which he or she would otherwise be entitled under Federal law, or for which he or she would otherwise be eligible as a result of the maintenance of such material, such material shall be disclosed to such individual, except to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the CFPB under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence: ( 1 ) CFPB.002 Depository Institution Supervision Database.
( 2 ) CFPB.003 Non-Depository Institution Supervision Database.
( 3 ) CFPB.004 Enforcement Database.
( 4 ) CFPB.005 Consumer Response System.
( b ) *Information compiled for civil actions or proceedings.* This subpart does not permit an individual to have access to any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION



 Exhibit 4.1 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION 
  
 OF THE 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION 
  
 FOR 
  
 SERIES G
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK 
  
 OF 
  
 VIE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 
  
 Pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, 
  
 VIE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation
(the “Corporation”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT: 
  
 1.
The Certificate of Designation for Series G Convertible Preferred Stock of the Corporation (the “Certificate of Designation”) was filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware on June 30, 2003, and the Certificate of
Designation requires correction as permitted by subsection (f) of Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
  
 2. The inaccuracy or defect of the Certificate of Designation is that said Certificate of Designation provided that the conversion price for the Series G
Preferred Stock shall be adjusted in certain circumstances for a period of ninety days commencing on the date on which the first share of Series G Preferred Stock is issued, whereas the ninety-day period for adjustment of the conversion price for
the Series G Preferred Stock should have commenced on the date on which the last share of Series G Preferred Stock is issued. 
  
 3. The inaccuracy or defect of the Certificate of Designation shall be corrected as follows: in the first sentence of Section 4(c)(ii), “first”
shall be replaced by “last”. 
  
 4. Section 4(c)(ii) is
corrected to read as follows: 
  
 For a period of 90 days
commencing on the date on which the last share of Series G Preferred Stock is issued, if the Corporation issues Common Stock, or a security convertible into Common Stock, for a price per share of Common Stock (on an as converted basis) less than the
Series G Conversion Price, then the Series G Conversion Rate shall be adjusted by replacing the Series G Conversion Price then in effect with the price per share at which the Common Stock, or security convertible into Common Stock, was issued;
provided, however, that an issuance of options by the Corporation under its 2002 Option Plan shall not trigger an adjustment hereunder. An adjustment made pursuant to this Section 4(c)(ii) shall become effective immediately after the opening
of business on the next day 







 
following the date on which the Common Stock, or security convertible into Common Stock, triggering the adjustment is issued. The Corporation shall give each
holder of Series G Preferred Stock written notice within 30 days of the adjustment taking effect, delivered to the applicable address set forth on the record books of the Corporation of each adjustment made pursuant to Section 4(c)(ii). 

 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Vie Financial Group, Inc. has caused this Certificate
of Correction of the Certificate of Designation for Series G Convertible Preferred Stock of Vie Financial Group, Inc. to be signed this 30th day of October, 2003. 
  

	 VIE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

		
	 By
	 	/S/    DEAN G. STAMOS
	 	 	

	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Dean G. Stamos

	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Chief Executive Officer



  

 2
#### § 1024.11 Mailing.

The provisions of this part requiring or permitting mailing of documents shall be deemed to be satisfied by placing the document in the mail (whether or not received by the addressee) addressed to the addresses stated in the loan application or in other information submitted to or obtained by the lender at the time of loan application or submitted or obtained by the lender or settlement agent, except that a revised address shall be used where the lender or settlement agent has been expressly informed in writing of a change in address.
Motion Granted and Order filed January 27, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00854-CV

____________

THOMAS RHONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A RHONE 

INVESTMENTS, Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF TEXAS CITY, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20CV1621

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction.

We have been notified that the trial court signed an amended temporary injunction 

order on January 5, 2021.

On January 26, 2021, appellee filed an emergency motion for enforcement of 

the amended temporary injunction order. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.4. The motion states 

appellant has not complied with the amended order’s requirement that he vacate all 
2

inhabitants of the property at issue in this lawsuit by January 25, 2021. 

Rule 29.4 provides that, while an appeal from an interlocutory order is 

pending, only the appellate court may enforce the order. Id. However, the rule also 

permits an appellate court to refer enforcement proceedings to the trial court. See id.

Appellee asks this court to enforce the amended order or refer the enforcement of 

the amended order to the trial court. See id. We grant the request to refer the 

enforcement to the trial court.

Accordingly, we order the Judge of the 405th District Court, Galveston 

County, to hold a hearing immediately concerning appellee’s motion to enforce the

trial court’s January 5, 2021 amended temporary injunction order. The trial court 

shall hear evidence and grant appropriate relief. The trial court shall see that a 

record of the hearing is made and direct the court reporter to file a transcript of the 

hearing in this court. The trial court shall order the trial court clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order on appellee’s motion 

in this court. The hearing transcript and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed 

with the clerk of this court on or before February 26, 2021. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Hassan, and Wilson.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2251

In re: TERRY DOWDELL,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

(No. 5:14-cv-25032)

Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Dowdell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Dowdell petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an 

order requiring resolution of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) 

petition within the time limits of 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (2012). We 

conclude that Dowdell is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in 

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 

509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the 

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Because the relief sought by Dowdell is not clear and 

indisputable, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | 1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | IR      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC. |
|                            |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| Date: August      14, 2008 | By:                      | /s/ Michael K.      Wilhelm                              |
|                            | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                            |                               |
Order entered October 8 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00517

- CR

ARIANNA LINDSEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1171158

- J



### O RDER

We GRANT appellee’s motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief

tendered to the Clerk of the Court October 6, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
§ 1010.505 Withdrawal of state certification. ( a ) The Director shall periodically review the laws, regulations and administration thereof, of a certified state. If the Director finds that, taken as a whole, the laws, regulations or administration thereof, no longer meet the requirements of subpart C, then the Director may issue a notice to withdraw the certification of that state.
( b ) The notice of proceedings to withdraw a state's certification will be issued to the state by the Director pursuant to § 1012.236. The Director may, after notice and after an opportunity for a hearing, pursuant to § 1012.237, issue an order withdrawing certification. In the event that a withdrawal order is issued, the order shall remain in effect until the state has amended its laws, regulations or the administration thereof or has otherwise complied with the requirements of the order. When the state has complied with the requirements of the order, the Director shall so declare and the withdrawal order shall cease to be effective.
( c ) Withdrawal orders issued pursuant to this subsection will be effective as of the date the order is received by the state. The withdrawal order shall be published in the Federal Register.
( d ) The rules of 12 CFR part 1080, unless otherwise specified in 12 CFR part 1012, subpart D, will generally apply to hearings on withdrawal of a state's certification.
Honorable John Hanger, Acting Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building, 1 6th Floor 

400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17 101 -2301 

Dear Secretary Hanger: 

On March 12,2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the 

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone to provide increased protection of 

public health and welfare fiom ozone pollution. The new primary ozone standard was lowered 

fiom 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm based on numerous epidemiological studies 

conducted during the past decade in which many of the health effects associated with ozone 

exposure have been demonstrated at and below the level of the 0.08 ppm standard, which was 

promulgated in 1997. These include a range of serious respiratory effects and increased 

premature mortality. EPA also strengthened the secondary 8-hour ozone standard, making it 

identical to the revised primary standard, to protect against welfare effects such as impacts on 

vegetation and forested ecosystems. 

Within one year of promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, section 1 O7(d)(l)(A) of 

the Clean Air Act requires the Governor of each state to submit to EPA a list of all areas in the 

state, recommending designations for each as "attainment," "nonattainment," or "unclassifiable" 

with respect to the new or revised standard. Therefore, EPA asks that you provide your 

designation recommendations, including appropriate area boundaries, to EPA by March 12,2009 

with respect to the revised ozone NAAQS. Establishing area designations is a key step in the 

process of providing the health protections that the Clean Air Act mandates. rea as that are 

designated as not attaining the air quality standards will be required to adopt plans to reduce 

ambient concentrations of ozone. 

The enclosed memorandum provides guidance to state and local air pollution control 

agencies and Tribes on the process for designating areas under the 2008 revised ozone standard. 

EPA plans to announce our intended designations as early as possible after receipt of your 

recommendations, but no later than 120 days prior to promulgating final designations. 

Following the announcement of intended designations, states and Tribes will have the 

' opportunity to comment on any modifications EPA proposes to their recommendations. In 

accordance with section 107(d)(l)(B) of the Clean Air Act, we intend to issue final designations 

by March 12,201 0 (although that deadline may be extended up to one additional year if EPA 

determines that insufficient information is available to establish designations by that date). Our 

designations will be based on the most recent three years of certified, quality assured monitoring 

data available. Ozone nonattainment areas will be classified at the time of designation. The 

approach EPA will use to classify nonattainment areas under the 2008 revised ozone NAAQS 
Sincerely, 

Is1 

Donald S. Welsh 

Regional Administrator 

Enclosure 

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
§ 21.7040 Categories of basic eligibility. Eligibility for basic educational assistance can be established by: ( a ) Some individuals who first become members of the Armed Forces or who first enter on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces after June 30, 1985, and
( b ) Some individuals who are eligible for educational assistance allowance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 34.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3011, 3012; Pub. L. 98-525)
[53 FR 1757, Jan. 22, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 28384, July 11, 1990]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2294 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

revise the definition of ‘‘violent offender’’ for the purpose of participation 

in drug courts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to revise the definition of ‘‘violent offender’’ 

for the purpose of participation in drug courts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhanced Participa5 tion in Drug Courts Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF VIOLENT OFFENDER. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 2953(a)(1) of the Omni8 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 

9 U.S.C. 3797u–2(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘that is 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2294 IH

1 punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year’’ 

2 after ‘‘convicted of an offense’’. 

3 (b) PERIOD FOR COMPLIANCE.—Notwithstanding 

4 section 2952(2) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

5 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797u–1(2)), each grantee 

6 under part EE of such Act shall have not more than 3 

7 years from the date of enactment of this Act to adopt the 

8 definition of ‘‘violent offender’’ under such part, as 

9 amended by subsection (a) of this section. 

10 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the 

11 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall re12 vise any regulations or guidelines described in section 

13 2952 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 

14 of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797u–1) in accordance with the 

15 amendments made by subsection (a). Such regulations 

16 shall specify that grant amounts under part EE of such 

17 Act shall be reduced for any drug court that does not 

18 adopt the definition of ‘‘violent offender’’ under such part, 

19 as amended by subsection (a) of this section, within 3 

20 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0582

Focus Ready Draft 9/3/2009

ENGINEER: Hall \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: No

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: 0.00%<500 0.00%<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (08/28/2009):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0582
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

 

 

 

 
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0582
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

 

 

 

 

CBI: 

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Jason A. Sese

Organization: ERG

CALL TO: 

Organization: 
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/reports%20for%20sanitization/CBI%20engineering%20reports/p090582.eng.txt[4/23/2010 12:28:51 PM]

Date: 08/31/2009

Time: 1:15pm

Phone: 

Concerning BI?

PMN: 09-0582
#### § 1024.16 Title companies.

No seller of property that will be purchased with the assistance of a federally related mortgage loan shall violate section 9 of RESPA (12 U.S.C. 2608). Section 1024.2 defines “required use” of a provider of a settlement service.
§ 21.5824 Nonduplication: Federal programs. ( a ) *Duplication of some benefits prohibited.* An individual who is receiving educational assistance under programs authorized by 38 U.S.C. Chapters 30, 31, 32, 34, 35 or 36 may not receive concurrently either educational assistance or subsistence allowance under the §§ 21.5700, 21.5800 and 21.5900 series of regulations for the same program of education, but may receive them sequentially.
( b ) *Debts may result from duplication.* ( 1 ) If an individual receives benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapters 30, 31, 32, 34, 35 or 36 for training, and he or she has previously received educational assistance or subsistence allowance (or both) under §§ 21.5700, 21.5800, 21.5900 series of regulations the amount of the benefits received under 38 U.S.C. Chapters 30, 31, 32, 34 or 35 shall not constitute a debt due the United States.
( 2 ) If an individual receives benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 34, and had signed an agreement with the Department of Defense to waive those benefits in return for receiving benefits under the educational assistance test program: ( i ) Any benefits already paid under the educational assistance test program will constitute a debt due the United States, and
( ii ) No further benefits under the educational assistance test program will be paid to the individual or to anyone to whom entitlement may be transferred.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141)