alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Thomas P. Benson, certify that:

(1)          Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CKX, Inc.

(2)          Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

(3)          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;

(4)          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the  registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the  registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the  registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

| **Date: August 8, 2006**                        |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| **/s/ THOMAS P. BENSON**                             |   |   |
| Thomas P. Benson                                     |   |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer, Executive Vice President* |   |   |
| *and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)*       |   |   |

 

40

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Gentle Dental Service Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of InterDent, Inc., of our report dated March 12, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Gentle Dental Service Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gentle Dental Service
Corporation.

/s/ KMPG LLP


Orange County, California
March 31, 1999
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6757

BRUCE M. RICHARDSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; WARDEN OF TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (3:09-cv-01107-MBS)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 17, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce M. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., 

Samuel Creighton Waters, Assistant Attorneys General, Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce M. Richardson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition

and its subsequent order denying his motion to reconsider. 

These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
ScanSource Ex10.2 03.31.15 Q3 10Q


Exhibit 10.2
REDACTED – OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND IS DENOTED HEREIN BY ***** 




Avaya Distributor Payment Terms Offer
16 March 2015 (Revised 17 March 2015)
Objective
*****, Avaya is offering to change the payment terms for eligible distribution partners (“Distributors”) to ***** calendar days from the date of the invoice for orders placed for Products or Services beginning March 16, 2015.  The payment terms may be subject to change upon no less than ***** days’ notice from Avaya effective on the date indicated on Avaya’s notice and without a need for any formal amendment to the Agreement.
Eligible Distributors
This change is extended to all US Distributors that meet the eligibility criteria.
Distributor Eligibility
The payment term change will apply to those Distributors ***** annually from Avaya Globally or if Theater only Distributor, ***** within theater and will apply to all products and services.
Distributor must be in good standing in regards to Accounts Receivable.
Timeframe
This new payment term is applicable to orders placed by Distributors beginning 16 March 2015, and will continue until otherwise notified by Avaya upon no less than ***** notice.
Operational Process:
Normal processes should be used and the new payment term will be automatically applied.
Terms and Conditions
1.  The Avaya account representatives have no authority to interpret or vary the terms of this notice.
2.  Avaya reserves the sole right to interpret and establish the terms and conditions of this notice.
3.  All other terms and conditions of the Distributor agreement remain unchanged.
4.      This is a discretionary offer from Avaya which does not give Distributors a contractual right to payment terms ***** calendar days.
5.      Information contained herein is confidential and proprietary information of Avaya and is provided for the internal use of Avaya and its authorized Distributors.  In no event shall Avaya be liable for any errors or omissions resulting from the information contained herein.
§ 21.7644 Overpayments. ( a ) *Prevention of overpayments.* In administering benefits payable under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606, VA will apply the provisions of §§ 21.4008 and 21.4009 of this part in the same manner as they are applied in the administration of 38 U.S.C. chapters 34 and 36. See § 21.7633. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3690(b); Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Penalties are not overpayments.* The Secretary concerned may require a refund from an individual who fails to participate satisfactorily in required training as a member of the Selected Reserve. This refund is subject to waiver by the Secretary. However, this refund— ( 1 ) Is not an overpayment for VA purposes, and
( 2 ) Is not subject to waiver by VA under § 1.957 of this chapter. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16135; Pub. L. 98-525)
( c ) *Liability for overpayments.* ( 1 ) The amount of the overpayment of educational assistance paid to a reservist constitutes a liability of that reservist unless— ( i ) The overpayment is waived as provided in § 1.957 of this chapter, or
( ii ) The overpayment results from an administrative error or an error in judgment. See § 21.7635(o) of this part.
( 2 ) The amount of the overpayment of educational assistance paid to a reservist constitutes as liability of the educational institution if VA determines that the overpayment was made as the result of— ( i ) Willful or negligent false certification by the educational institution, or
( ii ) Willful or negligent failure to certify excessive absences from a course, or discontinuance or interruption of a course by the reservist. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3685; Pub. L. 98-525)
( d ) *Waiver of recovery of overpayments.* ( 1 ) Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section in determining whether an overpayment should be waived or recovered from a reservist, VA will apply the provisions of § 1.957 of this chapter.
( 2 ) In determining whether an overpayment should be recovered from an educational institution, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4009(a)(2), (3), (4), and (5), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this part to overpayments of educational assistance under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 in the same manner as they are applied to overpayments of educational assistance allowance under 38 U.S.C. chapters 34 and 36. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3685, 5302; Pub. L. 98-525)


Cross Reference:
Entitlement charges. See § 21.7576(c) of this part offering training to veterans and servicemembers under 38 U.S.C. ch. 34. [53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996]
#### Ida M. C. Negley, Appellant, *v.*William F. Stone, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

C. I. Schampain, for appellant.

W. E. Deane, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The fact that the plaintiff collected rent for more than a year and a half after April, 1898, raises a very strong presumption that the defendant did not owe rent for April, 1898. In fact there is no evidence in the case that the defendant rented *734the premises for the month of April, 1898. The learned justice should not have allowed the defendant’s set-off for eighty dollars, for medical attendance to the plaintiff.

According to the defendant’s testimony nothing was said about his rendering free medical attendance to the plaintiff or her family. If the defendant was employed the husband of the plaintiff is liable in law and not the plaintiff herself.

This evidently was the defendant’s understanding, for the bill rendered by him was made out to the husband of the plaintiff and not to the plaintiff.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Proceedings of theinternational collaborative effort on perinatal and infant mortality[electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.6202:P 41/

Item Number:0508 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000873985
 
Volumes: 010203
 
April 2, 2020
Amendment, dated May 4, 2015, to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 May 4, 2015 

Mr. Bruce Telkamp 
 935 Damian Way 

Los Altos, CA 94024 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Employment Agreement 

 Dear Bruce: 

Reference is hereby made to the Employment Agreement, dated July 14, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), between you and Health
Insurance Innovations, Inc. The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement. In particular, Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following: 
 “(a) The Company shall employ Executive during the Term (as defined below) as CEO of the Company’s
Consumer Division and the CEO of HealthPocket. Executive shall have such authority and such responsibilities as are assigned or delegated to him from time to time by the Company, which shall include but not be limited to such authority and
responsibilities as are customarily associated with such positions.” 
 Except as amended and modified by this letter agreement, your
Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
 By signing this letter agreement below, you confirm
your agreement to the foregoing. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Michael W. Kosloske
	Michael W. Kosloske,
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed as of May 4, 2015.
		
	Signature:		 /s/ Bruce Telkamp

			Bruce Telkamp, individually
#### § 1033.121 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50770-50771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Docket No.: 0909181310-91315-01]


Privacy Act Altered System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology (NIST).

ACTION: Notice; COMMERCE/NIST-5, Nuclear Reactor Operator Licensees 
File.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) publishes this notice to 
announce the effective date of a Privacy Act System of Records notice 
entitled COMMERCE/NIST-5, Nuclear Reactor Operator Licensees File.

DATES: The system of records becomes effective on October 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: For a copy of the system of records please mail requests to

[[Page 50771]]

Catherine S. Fletcher, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
100 Bureau Drive--Stop 1710, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine S. Fletcher, National 
Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive--Stop 1710, 
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1710.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 1, 2007, the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology published and requested comments on a proposed 
Privacy Act System of Records notice entitled COMMERCE/NIST-5, Nuclear 
Reactor Operator Licensees File. No comments were received in response 
to the request for comments. By this notice, the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology is adopting the proposed system as final 
without changes effective October 1, 2009.

    Dated: September 25, 2009.
Brenda Dolan,
U.S. Department of Commerce, Freedom of Information/Privacy Act 
Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23670 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23732]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Modification Request Received Under the 
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit modification request received under the 
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Science Foundation 
(NSF) has received a request to modify a permit issued to conduct 
activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. 
L. 95-541; Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 670).

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to the permit modification by November 2, 2009. 
The permit modification request may be inspected by interested parties 
at the Permit Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly A. Penhale or Nadene G. Kennedy 
at the above address or (703) 292-8030.

Description of Permit Modification Requested

    On October 26, 2006, the National Science Foundation issued a waste 
management permit (2007 WM-001) to Rennie S. Holt, Director, Antarctic 
Marine Living Resources (AMLR) Program, Southwest Fisheries Service 
after posting a notice in the May 19, 2006 Federal Register. Public 
comments were not received. The issued permit was for the operation and 
maintenance of a remote science field camp at Cape Shirreff. Dr. Rennie 
Holt has subsequently retired and a new Director for the AMLR Program, 
Dr. George Watters, is now the permit holder. He has requested 
modifications to his waste permit to cover the use of an all-terrain 
vehicle (ATV) and construction of a small storage facility. The ATV is 
to replace the one originally provided by the Chilean Program to help 
move supplies and field cargo. In addition the AMLR Program plans to 
use an unmanned aerial vehicle (VTOL-UAV) for conducting census surveys 
of animal colonies. Finally the Program wishes up to release at sea up 
to 150 XBT's (expendable bathythermographs) and 55 drifters per annum 
to collect hydrographic data within the study survey grid to better 
understand the relationship between the target species and their 
environment.
    The duration of the requested modifications is coincident with the 
current permit which expires on April 15, 2011.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23732 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2022068EN.01000501.xml

| 9.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 February 2022

(2022/C 68/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1408 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4437 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84363 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4433 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0545 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0758 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,259 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 353,09 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5312 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9450 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,5558 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6025 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4505 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8923 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7196 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5349 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 367,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6380 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2636 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 418,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7740 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,715 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,7797 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,606 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0209 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5601 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,2545 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1408

JPY

Japanese yen

131,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4437

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84363

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4433

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0545

ISK

Iceland króna

142,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0758

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,259

HUF

Hungarian forint

353,09

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5312

RON

Romanian leu

4,9450

TRY

Turkish lira

15,5558

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6025

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4505

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8923

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7196

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5349

KRW

South Korean won

1 367,88

ZAR

South African rand

17,6380

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2636

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 418,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7740

PHP

Philippine peso

58,715

RUB

Russian rouble

85,7797

THB

Thai baht

37,606

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0209

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5601

INR

Indian rupee

85,2545

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---