alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.6021 Nonduplication—38 U.S.C., chapters 30, 31, 32, 34 and 35. ( a ) *Election between this temporary program and chapter 31 required.* A service-disabled veteran awarded VA pension who is offered a vocational training program under 38 U.S.C. chapter 15 and is also eligible for such assistance under chapter 31, must elect which benefit he or she will receive. The veteran may reelect at any time if he or she is still eligible for the benefit desired. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2); Pub. L. 100-687).
( b ) *VA educational assistance programs.* A veteran who is eligible under this program may receive an educational assistance allowance under chapter 30, 32, 34 or 35 if he or she is otherwise eligible under one of these programs. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2))
( c ) *Prior training under VA programs.* If a veteran has pursued an educational or training program under chapter 30, 32, 34 or 35, or a vocational rehabilitation program under chapter 31, the training received in the earlier program shall be considered, to the extent feasible, in determining the character and duration of the services to be furnished under this program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( d ) *Other prior training.* If a veteran has pursued other significant training under non-VA programs or on his or her own, such training will be considered in determining the character and duration of services to be furnished. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( e ) *Not limited by use of other entitlement.* The number of months of services provided under this program are not subject to the provisions of § 21.4020 of this part which limit the aggregate months of VA benefits to be provided.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2))
[53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 17272, Apr. 24, 1990]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL
     FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND
     THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
     SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             41,108,173
<SECURITIES>                                        1,830,183
<RECEIVABLES>                                      13,287,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                          238,000
<INVENTORY>                                         9,610,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   66,492,284
<PP&E>                                             57,240,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                     27,713,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     96,550,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              12,076,485
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                              520,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         82,930,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       96,550,982
<SALES>                                            60,195,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   60,195,036
<CGS>                                              39,616,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      50,502,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    11,133,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,477,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 9,656,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                        9,656,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            1.85

        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2019

s0225 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2019

158214

STRATEGY AND EXECUTION, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 158214

COA: 337105

Oakland CC: 2015

- 146756

- CK

LXR BIOTECH, LLC,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicatio n for leave to appeal the June 28, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2022043EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 January 2022

(2022/C 43/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1160 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4428 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83368 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4450 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0391 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9903 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,427 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,09 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5592 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9466 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,1946 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5771 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4161 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6951 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6872 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5089 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1112 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1061 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5328 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 052,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6844 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,295 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,1390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,124 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0159 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1430 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,7893 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1160

JPY

Japanese yen

128,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4428

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83368

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4450

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0391

ISK

Iceland króna

145,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9903

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,427

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,09

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5592

RON

Romanian leu

4,9466

TRY

Turkish lira

15,1946

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5771

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4161

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6951

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6872

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5089

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,50

ZAR

South African rand

17,1112

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1061

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5328

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 052,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6844

PHP

Philippine peso

57,295

RUB

Russian rouble

87,1390

THB

Thai baht

37,124

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0159

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1430

INR

Indian rupee

83,7893

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

OSCAR GUZMAN GARFIAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50403

D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00590-JHN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jacqueline H. Nguyen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Guzman Garfias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

37-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

FILED

SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-50403

U.S. 738 (1967), Garfias’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

Garfias the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental

brief or answering brief has been filed.

Garfias waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an

appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to

appeal his sentence, with the exception of the court’s calculation of his criminal

history category. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to

Garfias’s plea or the criminal history category calculated by the court. We

therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light

of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th

Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
# C_2021513EN.01000202.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/2

---

Election of the President of the Court

(2021/C 513/03)

At a meeting on 8 October 2021, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Lenaerts as President of the Court for the period from 8 October 2021 to 6 October 2024.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2619

To provide for the expansion of Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To provide for the expansion of Kilauea Point National 

Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kilauea Point National 

5 Wildlife Refuge Expansion Act of 2003’’ . 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF KILAUEA POINT NATIONAL WILD7 LIFE REFUGE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

9 acquire all or a portion of the land or interests in land 

10 described in subsection (b), as depicted on a map on file 

11 with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service entitled 
2

•HR 2619 IH 

1 ‘‘Kilauea Point Wildlife Refuge Expansion Area’’ and 

2 dated llll , 2003. 

3 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

4 subsection (a) is the following: 

5 (1) Parcel 1, consisting of approximately 12 

6 acres known as the Kilauea Bay property. 

7 (2) Parcel 2, consisting of approximately 45 

8 acres known as the Kilauea Vistas property. 

9 (3) Parcel 3, consisting of approximately 162 

10 acres known as the Kilauea Falls Ranch. 

11 (c) BOUNDARY REVISIONS.—The Secretary may 

12 make such minor revisions in the boundaries of any of the 

13 parcels described in subsection (b) as may be appropriate 

14 to facilitate the acquisition of land or interests under sub15 section (a). 

16 (d) INCLUSION IN REFUGE.—Land and interests ac17 quired under this section shall become part of the Kilauea 

18 Point National Wildlife Refuge. 

19 (e) REFUGE PURPOSES.—Upon acquisition of any 

20 land or interest in land described in subsection (b), the 

21 purposes of the Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge 

22 shall include—

23 (1) the protection and recovery of endangered 

24 Hawaiian waterbirds and the endangered Nene (Ha25 waiian goose); and 
3

•HR 2619 IH 

1 (2) the conservation and management of native 

2 coastal strand, riparian, and aquatic biological diver3 sity.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Consumers Financial Corporation because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2005.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on September 29, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 12, 2009.                

      ( print page 50852)    
By the Commission.

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-23805 Filed 9-29-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 21.3130 Educational assistance. ( a ) *Approval of a program of education.* VA will approve a program of education selected by an eligible person if: ( 1 ) The program is described in § 21.3021 (h) and (i) or (j);
( 2 ) The individual is not already qualified for the objective of the program of education;
( 3 ) The proposed educational institution or training establishment is in compliance with all the requirements of 38 U.S.C. chapters 35 and 36; and
( 4 ) It does not appear that the enrollment in or pursuit of such person's program of education would violate any provision of 38 U.S.C. chapters 35 and 36. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3521)
( b ) *Payments.* VA will pay educational assistance at the rate specified in § 21.3131 (subject to the reductions required by § 21.3132) while the eligible person is pursuing an approved program of education or training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3521, 3532)
( c ) *No payment for excessive training.* ( 1 ) VA will make no payment for: ( i ) Training in an apprenticeship or other on-job training program in excess of the number of hours approved by the State approving agency or VA; or
( ii ) Lessons completed in a correspondence course in excess of the number approved by the State approving agency.
( 2 ) A school's standards of progress may permit a student to repeat a course or portion of a course in which he or she has done poorly. VA considers the repeated courses to be part of the program of education. VA will make no payment for courses or training if the courses or training are not part of the eligible person's program of education. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3501(a)(5), 3521)
( d ) *Courses precluded.* VA may not pay educational assistance: ( 1 ) For pursuit of a course if approval of the enrollment in the course is precluded by § 21.4252;
( 2 ) For training in a foreign country unless the training is in the Philippines or is approved pursuant to the provisions of § 21.4260;
( 3 ) For pursuit of a course offered by open-circuit television, unless the eligible person's pursuit meets the requirements of § 21.4233(c); or
( 4 ) For pursuit of a course offered by independent study, unless the course is accredited, meets the requirements of § 21.4253, and leads to a standard college degree. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3523)
( e ) *Commencing date.* In determining the commencing date of an award of educational assistance, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4131.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5113)
[61 FR 26109, May 24, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 2424, Jan. 15, 2008]
#### § 21.45 Extending the period of eligibility for a program of independent living beyond basic period of eligibility.

A Counseling Psychologist (CP) or Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor (VRC) may extend the period of eligibility for a veteran's program of independent living services beyond the veteran's basic period of eligibility if the CP or VRC determines that an extension is necessary for the veteran to achieve maximum independence in daily living. The extension may be for such period as the CP or VRC determines is needed for the veteran to achieve the goals of his or her program of independent living. (*See* § 21.76(b) concerning duration of independent living services.)

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3103(d))

[75 FR 3166, Jan. 20, 2010]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MEJIA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 21

- 16550

D.C. No. 4:21

- cv

- 01351

- HSG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022 * *

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jose Me jia appeals pro se from t he district court’s order dismissing his

diversity action alleging state law breach of contract and negligence claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

failure to state claim under Federal Rule of Civil Proce dure (12)(b)(6)

. Cervantes

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 16550

v. United States , 330 F.3d 1186, 1187 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mejia’s action because Mejia failed to

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S.

662, 678 (2009) ( to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual

matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face”

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted) ) ; Oasis W. Re alty, LLC v. Goldman

,

250 P.3d 1115, 1121 (Cal. 2011) (elements of a breach of contract claim);

Castellon v. U.S. Bancorp

, 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 637, 640 ( Ct. App. 2013) (elements of

a negligence claim).

AFFIRMED.
§ 401.11 Appeals. ( a ) The agency official initially authorized to take any of the following actions shall provide the contractor with a written statement of the basis for his or her action at the time the action is taken, including any relevant facts that were relied upon in taking the action. ( 1 ) A refusal to grant an extension under paragraph (c)(5) of the standard clause at § 401.14.
( 2 ) A request for a conveyance of title under paragraph (d)(1) of the standard clause at § 401.14.
( 3 ) A refusal to grant a waiver under paragraph (i) of the standard clause at § 401.14.
( 4 ) A refusal to approve an assignment under paragraph (k)(1) of the standard clause at § 401.14.
( b ) Each agency shall establish and publish procedures under which any of the agency actions listed in paragraph (a) of this section may be appealed to the head of the agency or designee. Review at this level shall consider both the factual and legal basis for the actions and its consistency with the policy and objectives of 35 U.S.C. 200-206.
( c ) Appeals procedures established under paragraph (b) of this section shall include administrative due process procedures and standards for fact-finding at least comparable to those set forth in § 401.6(a)(4) through (6) whenever there is a dispute as to the factual basis for an agency request for a conveyance of title under paragraph (d) of the standard clause at § 401.14, including any dispute as to whether or not an invention is a subject invention.
( d ) To the extent that any of the actions described in paragraph (a) of this section are subject to appeal under the Contract Dispute Act, the procedures under the Act will satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
[88 FR 17737, Mar. 24, 2023]
§ 1291.16 Conflicts of interest. ( a ) *Bank directors and employees.* ( 1 ) Each Bank's board of directors shall adopt a written policy providing that if a Bank director or employee, or such person's family member, has a financial interest in, or is a director, officer, or employee of an organization involved in, a project that is the subject of a pending or approved AHP application, the Bank director or employee shall not participate in or attempt to influence decisions by the Bank regarding the evaluation, approval, funding, monitoring, or any remedial process for such project.
( 2 ) If a Bank director or employee, or such person's family member, has a financial interest in, or is a director, officer, or employee of an organization involved in, an AHP project such that he or she is subject to the requirements in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, such person shall not participate in or attempt to influence decisions by the Bank regarding the evaluation, approval, funding, monitoring, or any remedial process for such project.
( b ) *Advisory Council members.* ( 1 ) Each Bank's board of directors shall adopt a written policy providing that if an Advisory Council member, or such person's family member, has a financial interest in, or is a director, officer, or employee of an organization involved in, a project that is the subject of a pending or approved AHP application, the Advisory Council member shall not participate in or attempt to influence decisions by the Bank regarding the approval for such project.
( 2 ) If an Advisory Council member, or such person's family member, has a financial interest in, or is a director, officer, or employee of an organization involved in, an AHP project such that he or she is subject to the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, such person shall not participate in or attempt to influence decisions by the Bank regarding the approval for such project.
( c ) *No delegation.* A Bank's board of directors shall not delegate to Bank officers or other Bank employees the responsibility to adopt the conflict of interest policies required by this section.