alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 6A/6 Ja

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 6A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 656 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 6A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 656 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Corrigendum to the Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Irish language (GA) Lawyer linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 466 A, 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2022/C 6 A/01

Corrigendum to the Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Irish language (GA) Lawyer linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

( OJ C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 6.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 6/1

---

Corrigendum to the Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Irish language (GA) Lawyer linguists (AD 7)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 466 A of 18 November 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

On page 1:

| for: | ‘Deadline for registration: 21 December 2021 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘Deadline for registration: 21 December 2021 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’,

| read: | ‘Deadline for registration: 25 January 2022 at 12.00 (midday), Luxembourg time’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘Deadline for registration: 25 January 2022 at 12.00 (midday), Luxembourg time’.

On page 5:

| for: | ‘Apply online on the EPSO website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities by:

  21 December 2021 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

for:

‘Apply online on the EPSO website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities by:

21 December 2021 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’,

| read: | ‘Apply online on the EPSO website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities by:

  25 January 2022 at 12.00 (midday), Luxembourg time.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘Apply online on the EPSO website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities by:

25 January 2022 at 12.00 (midday), Luxembourg time.’.

---
§ 1230.2 Definitions. The following definitions apply to the terms used in this part: *Charter acts* mean the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act, which are codified at 12 U.S.C. 1716 through 1723i and 12 U.S.C. 1451 through 1459, respectively.
*Compensation* means any payment of money or the provision of any other thing of current or potential value in connection with employment. Compensation includes all direct and indirect payments of benefits, both cash and non-cash, granted to or for the benefit of any executive officer, including, but not limited to, payments and benefits derived from an employment contract, compensation or benefit agreement, fee arrangement, perquisite, stock option plan, post-employment benefit, or other compensatory arrangement.
*Enterprise* means the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, Enterprises) and, except as provided by the Director, any affiliate thereof.
*Executive officer* means: ( 1 ) With respect to an Enterprise: ( i ) The chairman of the board of directors, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, president, vice chairman, any executive vice president, any senior vice president, any individual in charge of a principal business unit, division, or function, and any individual who performs functions similar to such positions whether or not the individual has an official title; and
( ii ) Any other officer as identified by the Director;
( 2 ) With respect to a Bank: ( i ) The president, the chief financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated officers; and
( ii ) Any other officer as identified by the Director.
( 3 ) With respect to the Office of Finance: ( i ) The chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief operating officer; and
( ii ) Any other officer identified by the Director.
*Reasonable and comparable* means compensation that is: ( 1 ) *Reasonable* —compensation, taken in whole or in part, that would be appropriate for the position and based on a review of relevant factors including, but not limited to: ( i ) The duties and responsibilities of the position;
( ii ) Compensation factors that indicate added or diminished risks, constraints, or aids in carrying out the responsibilities of the position; and
( iii ) Performance of the regulated entity, the specific employee, or one of the entity's significant components with respect to achievement of goals, consistency with supervisory guidance and internal rules of the entity, and compliance with applicable law and regulation.
( 2 ) *Comparable* —compensation that, taken in whole or in part, does not materially exceed compensation paid at institutions of similar size and function for similar duties and responsibilities.
*Regulated entity* means any Enterprise and any Federal Home Loan Bank.
# C_2022069EN.01001001.xml

| 10.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/10

---

Calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2022 under Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)

(2022/C 69/10)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2022 under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027).

The Commission has adopted the EIC Work Programme 2022 by Decision C(2022) 701 of 7 February 2022.

Proposals are invited for these calls. The EIC Work Programme 2022, including deadlines and budgets, is available through the Funding & Tender opportunities website along with information on the modalities of the calls and related activities and the information for applicants on how to submit proposals:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home

---
# Official Journal L 361/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 361 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5717 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 361

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5717 December 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1320/2014 of 1 December 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1320/2014 of 1 December 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
SERVED: JUNE 29,2012 

-- - -- - ~ ,.,. -. ~.--.-

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP05SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2005-22891 

----------------------------------------------

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On October 25, 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed 

a Complaint. On October 19, 2005, Mesa Airlines ("Respondent") had requested a 

hearing. By motion dated .(une 28, 2012, Respondent filed a Withdrawal oLRequest for 

Hearing and moved to dismiss this proceeding, citing settlement of the matter in the 

context of the reorganization in bankruptcy of Respondent and its parent company, Mesa 

Air Group, Inc. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for_ a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge .. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." · 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is .ORDERED that: . 

?· ! ") I_'_,• _) 
2 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing is hereby GRANTED; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachments - Service List 

f.tMC_GwL_~ · 1chard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

.. 
FAA Docket No. CP05SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 20141 

Christopher Pappaioanou 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: (602) 685-4000 

FAX: (602) 685-4350 

Annjenet Chennault, Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL: (817) 222-5071 

FAX: (817) 222-5092/5946 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 "' 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

.. 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building- Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1024.34 Timely escrow payments and treatment of escrow account balances. ( a ) *Timely escrow disbursements required.* If the terms of a mortgage loan require the borrower to make payments to the servicer of the mortgage loan for deposit into an escrow account to pay taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges for the mortgaged property, the servicer shall make payments from the escrow account in a timely manner, that is, on or before the deadline to avoid a penalty, as governed by the requirements in § 1024.17(k).
( b ) *Refund of escrow balance* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, within 20 days (excluding legal public holidays, Saturdays, and Sundays) of a borrower's payment of a mortgage loan in full, a servicer shall return to the borrower any amounts remaining in an escrow account that is within the servicer's control.
( 2 ) *Servicer may credit funds to a new escrow account.* Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if the borrower agrees, a servicer may credit any amounts remaining in an escrow account that is within the servicer's control to an escrow account for a new mortgage loan as of the date of the settlement of the new mortgage loan if the new mortgage loan is provided to the borrower by a lender that: ( i ) Was also the lender to whom the prior mortgage loan was initially payable;
( ii ) Is the owner or assignee of the prior mortgage loan; or
( iii ) Uses the same servicer that serviced the prior mortgage loan to service the new mortgage loan.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40972

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS LOZANO-HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-216-ALL 

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Lozano-Herrera (“Lozano”) pleaded guilty to one count

of being found in the United States without having obtained

permission to re-enter after deportation and was sentenced to 

46 months of imprisonment. Lozano argues, for the first time on

appeal, that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Lozano’s argument

is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998). See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.

2000). 
No. 04-40972

-2-

Also for the first time on appeal, Lozano, relying on the

possibility that Almendarez-Torres will be overruled, as well as

on Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), argues that the

federal sentencing guidelines are unconstitutional because they

permit the enhancement of a sentence based on prior convictions. 

Lozano’s argument fails because Almendarez-Torres has not been

overruled and because the enhancement of a sentence based on

prior convictions does not violate the Sixth Amendment. See

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2709 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2709

  To extend the minimum wage index established by regulation for each 
   all-urban State under the Medicare inpatient hospital prospective 
                            payment system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2007

  Mr. Saxton (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the minimum wage index established by regulation for each 
   all-urban State under the Medicare inpatient hospital prospective 
                            payment system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE MINIMUM WAGE INDEX ESTABLISHED BY 
              REGULATION FOR EACH ALL-URBAN STATE UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              INPATIENT HOSPITAL PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM.

    Section 412.64 of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations shall 
be administered as if ``and before September 30, 2007'' were deleted 
from paragraph (h)(4) of such section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  September 11, 2009 By:/s/ James R. Musick_________ Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
§ 21.7110 Selection of a program of education. ( a ) *Payments of educational assistance are usually based on pursuit of a program of education.* In order to receive educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, a veteran or servicemember must— ( 1 ) Be pursuing an approved program of education;
( 2 ) Be pursuing refresher or deficiency courses;
( 3 ) Be pursuing other preparatory or special education or training courses necessary to enable the veteran or servicemember to pursue an approved program of education;
( 4 ) Have taken an approved licensing or certification test, for which he or she is requesting reimbursement; or
( 5 ) Be an individual who has taken a course for which the individual received tuition assistance provided under a program administered by the Secretary of a military department under 10 U.S.C. 2007(a) or (c), for which the individual is requesting tuition assistance top-up. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3014, 3023, 3034, 3689)
( b ) *Approval of a program of education.* VA will approve a program of education under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30 that a veteran or servicemember selects if: ( 1 ) It meets the definition of a program of education found in § 21.7020(b)(23);
( 2 ) Except for a program consisting of a licensing or certification test, has an objective as described in § 21.7020(b)(13) or (22);
( 3 ) The courses, subjects, or licensing or certification tests in the program are approved for VA training; and
( 4 ) Except for a program consisting of a licensing or certification test designed to help the veteran or servicemember maintain employment in a vocation or profession, the veteran or servicemember is not already qualified for the objective of the program.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3002(3), 3034, 3471, 3689)
[72 FR 16980, Apr. 5, 2007]
§ 1.930 Scope and application. ( a ) The standards set forth in §§ 1.930 through 1.936 of this part apply to the compromise of debts pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711. VA may exercise such compromise authority when the amount of the debt due, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, does not exceed $100,000 or any higher amount authorized by the Attorney General.
( b ) Unless otherwise provided by law, when the principal balance of a debt, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, exceeds $100,000 or any higher amount authorized by the Attorney General, the authority to accept the compromise rests with the Department of Justice (DOJ). If VA receives an offer to compromise any debt in excess of $100,000, VA should evaluate the compromise offer using the same factors as set forth in § 1.931 of this part. If VA believes the offer has merit, it shall refer the debt to the Civil Division or other appropriate division in DOJ using a Claims Collection Litigation Report (CCLR). The referral shall include appropriate financial information and a recommendation for the acceptance of the compromise offer. DOJ approval is not required if VA decides to reject a compromise offer.
( c ) The $100,000 limit in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply to debts that arise out of participation in a VA loan program under Chapter 37 of Title 38 of the U.S. Code. VA has unlimited authority to compromise debts arising out of participation in a Chapter 37 loan program, regardless of the amount of the debt.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C 501, 3720)
[69 FR 62198, Oct. 25, 2004]
IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

FERNANDO MAGALDE §

Appellant §

§

V- • & 08-12^00065-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee §

FILED IN

MDTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CRIMINAL APPEALS

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ,._,_ n „„,„

: ; FEB 02 ^j

CAUSE NO 08-12-00064-CR

§

Abel Acosta, Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

COMES Now, The Appellant Fernando Magalde Pro se to file this Motion

for an extension of time of 90 days to prepare and file his out of time motion

and /Petition for Discretionary Review/In support thereof will show the court

the following

I

On January 14/2015/The court of Criminal Appeals recently ruled d>n favor

of the .^Appellant granting his Application*! for Writ of Habeas pursuant to

Article 11.07 T-C.C.P An the Opportunity to file an Out-of-time petition

for Discretionary Review of the judgment of the 8th Court of Appeals that

affirmed his Conviction in TC NO 20110D06141/TC NO 20110D05035 from the

120th District Court of El Paso County ,the order requires that the petition _•

be filed 30 days after the mandate has issued -Writ NO 82/561-®!

RECEIVEDIN

0URT OFCRIMINAL APPEAL

JAN 29 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
II

Therefore totadeqaatelyy discharge his Responsibilities Applicant Respectforly

seeks an extension of 90 days,the additional time will allow hiTM;to review

court Documents and Determine the best approch in preparing his petition

and the arqument of the issues presented therein / / as Such this motion

is made in good faith and is in no way meant to delay of hinder the appellate

process, / Appellant is pro se and without Counsel and needs the addition

time to Conduct Research ancf Case Laws in an efforded to provide the court

with a Meaningful arqument for review

PRAfER

Wherefore Premises Considered, Appellant motion for an extension of time and

qrant the relief prayed for herein

Respectfully Submitted

Fernando Maqalde TDCJ-#

01828858

McConnell Unit

3001 S/Emily DR

Beeville,Texas 78102

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I/Fernando Maqalde / hereby-certify that a true and correct copy of the

above foreqoinq instrument has been sent to the clerk of the Court of

Criminal Appeals P.O.Box 12308 Capito.l Station Austin,Texas 78711, ON THIS

—^^ day of vQftl gag 2015 By placing the same in the U. S Postage Mail

box here at the McConnell Unit

Respectfully Submitted

Fenando Maqalde TDCJ-#

01828858
FERNANDO MAGALDE -V. THE STATE OF TEXAS RE:WR-82,561-01

The the Clerk of said court

Please find enclosed the appellants Motion for an extension of time

appellant recieved the opinion of the court in the above Referance number

granting his Writ Applicafcioni for Hebeas Relief /as such the opinion states

that he is to file his out-of-time petition for Discretionary Review 30 days

after issuance of the mandate /Appellant has not recieved a copy of such

and felted it best to seek addition time with that said please date sstamp

and file the -..attached motion for a ruling by this Honorable Court

Respectfully

Fernando Magaldo /TDCJ

# 1828058

McConnell Unit

3001 S,Emily DR

Beeville Texas 78102

t / 26 / 2015

^U>74^?</0 c