alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-10394

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00167-GAP-GJK-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MICHAEL PATRICK WAHL, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 14, 2013)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-10394 Date Filed: 11/14/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Mark Wahl appeals his 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute and manufacture marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and 

possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vii), (b)(1)(D), and 2. Wahl contends his mandatory 

minimum 120-month sentence was not just, fair, or appropriate, and implicated his 

Eighth Amendment right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment. He 

concedes, however, there is no case law on point to support his position. 

“We review de novo the legality of a sentence under the Eighth 

Amendment.” United States v. McGarity, 669 F.3d 1218, 1255 (11th Cir. 2012).

“Our jurisprudence recognizes a ‘narrow proportionality principle that applies to 

noncapital sentences.” Id. at 1255-56 (citing United States v Johnson, 451 F.3d 

1239, 1242 (11th Cir. 2006)). When addressing an Eighth Amendment challenge: 

a reviewing court must make a threshold determination that the 

sentence imposed is grossly disproportionate to the offense committed 

and, if it is grossly disproportionate, the court must then consider the 

sentences imposed on others convicted in the same jurisdiction and 

the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other 

jurisdictions. 

United States v. Raad, 406 F.3d 1322, 1324 (11th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). 

The burden lies with the defendant to make a threshold showing that his sentence 

is grossly disproportionate to the offense. McGarity, 669 F.3d at 1256.

We have upheld mandatory minimum sentences in various contexts. See 

Raad, 406 F.3d at 1324 (outlining case law upholding mandatory minimum 

Case: 13-10394 Date Filed: 11/14/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
3

sentences). Sentences as high as mandatory life have been held constitutional by 

the Supreme Court. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 994-95 (1991). 

Wahl has failed to carry his burden to make a threshold showing that his 

sentence violated the Eighth Amendment, and has conceded that no case law 

supports his position. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-10394 Date Filed: 11/14/2013 Page: 3 of 3
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-41-16

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; HIROKO URANO, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4472932)

Calendar Date: March 14, 2016 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Hiroko Urano, Tokyo, Japan, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2007, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object-2- D-41-16

to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofThe Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley A. Galanski, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stanley A. Galanski |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Stanley A. Galanski     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 15, 2003            |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The NavigatorsGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Navigators Group, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
§ 1200.1 Federal Housing Finance Agency. ( a ) *Scope and authority.* The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is an independent agency of the Federal Government. Division A of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, Public Law 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654, titled the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008, amended the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501 *et seq.*) (Safety and Soundness Act) and the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1421-1449) to establish FHFA. FHFA administers the Safety and Soundness Act and the regulated entities' authorizing statutes: the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act. FHFA is responsible for the supervision and regulation of the Federal National Mortgage Corporation (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), (together, Enterprises), the Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks) (collectively, the “regulated entities”), and the Office of Finance (OF). FHFA is charged with ensuring that the regulated entities: Operate in a safe and sound manner, including maintaining adequate capital and internal controls; foster liquid, efficient, competitive, and resilient national housing finance markets; comply with the Safety and Soundness Act and their respective authorizing statutes, and rules, regulations and orders issued under the Safety and Soundness Act and the authorizing statutes; and carry out their respective statutory missions through activities and operations that are authorized and consistent with the Safety and Soundness Act, their respective authorizing statutes, and the public interest. FHFA's costs and expenses are funded by annual assessments paid by the regulated entities. FHFA is headed by a director, who is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for a five-year term.
( b ) *Location.* FHFA's headquarters is located at 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. FHFA's official hours of business are 8:00 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern Time), Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
[77 FR 73264, Dec. 10, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 80233, Dec. 24, 2015]
#### § 1070.48 Disclosure of confidential information by the Inspector General.

Nothing in this subpart shall limit the discretion of the Office of the Inspector General of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to disclose confidential information as needed in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
§ 71.35 General Caregivers. ( a ) A General Caregiver is a person who: ( 1 ) Is not a Primary or Secondary Family Caregiver; and
( 2 ) Provides personal care services to a covered veteran under this section, even if the individual does not reside with the veteran.
( b ) A covered veteran, for purposes of this section, is a veteran who is enrolled in the VA health care system and needs personal care services because the veteran either: ( 1 ) Is unable to perform an activity of daily living; or
( 2 ) Needs supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological or other impairment or injury.
( c ) No application or clinical evaluation is required to obtain benefits as a General Caregiver. Veterans or General Caregivers may request any of the benefits listed in § 71.40(a) as needed, from the appropriate VA clinicians and staff at their local VA facilities.
( d ) A veteran is not required to meet the eligibility requirements in § 71.20 to be considered a covered veteran.
[76 FR 26172, May 5, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 1377, Jan. 9, 2015. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 46296, July 31, 2020]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 5, 2009 |   | /s/ Gerard E.  Puorro                  |
|--------|------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Gerard E. Puorro                       |
|   |             |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2012182EN.01000701.xml

| 22.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2012

2012/C 182/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2670 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4330 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8360 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4960 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2537 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2735 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2444 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2907 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8313 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5857 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6102 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 462,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4319 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0643 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 983,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0246 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,753 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,177 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5719 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3374 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,3380 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2670

JPY

Japanese yen

101,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4330

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80695

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8360

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4960

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2537

RON

Romanian leu

4,4660

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2735

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2444

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2907

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8313

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5857

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6102

KRW

South Korean won

1 462,48

ZAR

South African rand

10,4319

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0643

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 983,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0246

PHP

Philippine peso

53,753

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6200

THB

Thai baht

40,177

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5719

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3374

INR

Indian rupee

71,3380

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1322 

CA 14-00594 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SMALL SMILES LITIGATION

--------------------------------------------

KELLY VARANO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN 

OF INFANT JEREMY BOHN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

 

V ORDER

FORBA HOLDINGS, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS CHURCH STREET 

HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, FORBA, N.Y., LLC, 

FORBA, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS LICSAC, LLC, FORBA 

NY, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS LICSAC NY, LLC, DD 

MARKETING, INC., DEROSE MANAGEMENT, LLC, SMALL 

SMILES DENTISTRY OF SYRACUSE, LLC, DANIEL E. 

DEROSE, MICHAEL A. DEROSE, D.D.S., EDWARD J. 

DEROSE, D.D.S., ADOLPH R. PADULA, D.D.S., 

WILLIAM A. MUELLER, D.D.S., MICHAEL W. ROUMPH, 

NAVEED AMAN, D.D.S., KOURY BONDS, D.D.S., AND 

YAQOOB KHAN, D.D.S., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, ALBANY (MATTHEW S. LERNER OF COUNSEL), AND

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE, FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS FORBA HOLDINGS, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS CHURCH STREET 

HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, FORBA, N.Y., LLC, AND SMALL 

SMILES DENTISTRY OF SYRACUSE, LLC. 

O’CONNOR, O’CONNOR, BRESEE & FIRST, P.C., ALBANY (LIA B. MITCHELL OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS FORBA, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS LICSAC,

LLC, FORBA NY, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS LICSAC NY, LLC, DD MARKETING, INC.,

DEROSE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIEL E. DEROSE, MICHAEL A. DEROSE, D.D.S.,

EDWARD J. DEROSE, D.D.S., ADOLPH R. PADULA, D.D.S., WILLIAM A.

MUELLER, D.D.S., AND MICHAEL W. ROUMPH. 

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, ALBANY (MELISSA A.

MURPHY-PETROS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS NAVEED AMAN,

D.D.S., KOURY BONDS, D.D.S., AND YAQOOB KHAN, D.D.S. 

POWERS & SANTOLA, LLP, ALBANY (MICHAEL J. HUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered December 3, 2013. The order

granted the motion of plaintiff for a new trial.
-2- 1322 

CA 14-00594 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 

985, 985). 

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# Official Journal C 152/9 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 479 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 479 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 152/1

Euro exchange rates

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 9.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1040 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5229 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,243 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5957 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,870 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0262 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2294

JPY

Japanese yen

135,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4349

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1040

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5229

ISK

Iceland króna

87,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58300

CZK

Czech koruna

31,243

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6623

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4263

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5957

ROL

Romanian leu

40 758

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,1500

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,870

TRL

Turkish lira

1 811 841

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7507

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6520

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5838

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9568

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0990

KRW

South Korean won

1 423,46

ZAR

South African rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
§ 1081.215 Prehearing submissions. ( a ) *Generally.* Within the time set by the hearing officer, but in no case later than 14 days before the start of the hearing, each party must serve on every other party: ( 1 ) A prehearing statement, which must include an outline or narrative summary of the party's case or defense, and the legal theories upon which the party will rely;
( 2 ) A final list of witnesses to be called to testify at the hearing, including the name and address of each witness and a short summary of the expected testimony of each witness;
( 3 ) Any prior sworn statements that a party intends to admit into evidence pursuant to § 1081.303(h);
( 4 ) A list of the exhibits to be introduced at the hearing along with a copy of each exhibit; and
( 5 ) Any stipulations of fact or liability.
( b ) *Expert witnesses.* Each party who intends to call an expert witness must also serve, in addition to the information required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a statement of the expert's qualifications, a listing of other proceedings in which the expert has given or sought to give expert testimony at trial or hearing or by deposition within the preceding four years, and a list of publications authored or co-authored by the expert within the preceding ten years, to the extent such information has not already been provided pursuant to § 1081.210.
( c ) *Effect of failure to comply.* No witness may testify and no exhibits may be introduced at the hearing if such witness or exhibit is not listed in the prehearing submissions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, except for good cause shown.
# Official Journal C 233A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 233A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6211 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 233A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6211 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2019/C 233 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/08/19 — Parliamentary Ushers (SC 1/SC 2) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2019/C 233 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/08/19 — Parliamentary Ushers (SC 1/SC 2)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Retention Bonus Agreement dated as of June 27, 2003



 EXHIBIT 10.18 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615 Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  
 June 27, 2003 
  
 Daniel L. Murphy  
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear Daniel: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the
“Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn
Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Bank under your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you
will receive a retention bonus of $600,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your
new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the
product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 	 	 	 	 Sincerely,

				
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Joseph R. Ficalora

 President and Chief Executive Officer

			
	 Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Daniel L. Murphy

	 	 	 	 
	 Daniel L. Murphy
	 	 	 	 

  

 2
§ 21.8286 Training resources. ( a ) *Applicable 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 resource provisions.* The provisions of § 21.146 and §§ 21.290 through 21.298 apply to children pursuing a vocational training program under this subpart in a comparable manner as for veterans under the 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 program, except as paragraph (b) of this section specifies. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( b ) *Limitations.* The provisions of § 21.294(b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(ii) pertaining to independent living services do not apply to this subpart. The provisions of § 21.294(b)(1)(iii) pertaining to authorization of independent living services as a part of an individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation apply to children under this subpart in a comparable manner as for veterans under the 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 program only to the extent § 21.8050 allows.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)