alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 378/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 378 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6312 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 378

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6312 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1673 of 5 November 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Trójniak staropolski tradycyjny’ (TSG)) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1674 of 29 October 2020 authorising Sweden to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port, in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1675 of 11 November 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1673 of 5 November 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Trójniak staropolski tradycyjny’ (TSG))

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1674 of 29 October 2020 authorising Sweden to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port, in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC

3

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1675 of 11 November 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1541

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GREEN DOT CORPORATION; GREEN DOT BANK; FINGERHUT; 

BLUESTEM SALES, INC.; EXPERIAN DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN SERVICES 

CORP.; TRANSUNION DATA SOLUTIONS LLC; TRANSUNION LLC; 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; DOES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:22-cv-00109-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Camille R. Nicodemus, SCHUCKIT 

& ASSOCIATES PC, Zionsville, Indiana, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order denying 

McDaniel’s (a) application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP); and (b) motion for District 

Judge Conrad’s recusal. We have jurisdiction over that part of the order denying 

McDaniel’s IFP application because an order denying “a motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis is an appealable [interlocutory] order.” Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 

845 (1950) (per curiam). However, on appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised 

in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McDaniel’s informal brief does not 

challenge the district court’s rationale for denying her IFP application, McDaniel has 

forfeited appellate review of that portion of the appealed-from order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; 

under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm as to this part of the court’s order. 

Turning to the remainder of this appeal, this court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). While McDaniel’s informal brief restates her allegations of judicial bias, 

that portion of the appealed-from order—specifically, Judge Conrad’s denial of 

McDaniel’s recusal motion—is not an immediately appealable interlocutory or collateral 

ruling. See In re Va. Elec. & Power Co., 539 F.2d 357, 363-64 (4th Cir. 1976). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the remainder of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32-2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul J. Malvasio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Paul J. Malvasio         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Paul J. Malvasio             |
| Executive Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer      |
| August 4, 2005          |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The Navigators Group, Inc. and will be retained by The NavigatorsGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
# Official Journal C 376/30 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 376 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6530 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 376

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6530 September 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 376/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2022 to 31 August 2022(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 376/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2022 to 31 August 2022(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

#### § 51.400 Participant rights.

The State home must protect and promote the rights of a participant in an adult day health care program, including the rights set forth in § 51.70, except for the right set forth in § 51.70(m). For purposes of this section, the references to resident in the cited section also refer to a participant in this section.

(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0160)
## EXHIBIT 32.1

## Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by
FCCC, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
        1934, as amended, and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial conditions
        and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 
| | 

| | Name: Bernard Zimmerman                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 3, 2005

---
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Liberia

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Liberia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia

During the review period, the government did not make its budget documents, including the executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end of year report, publicly available in a reasonable period of time.  Information on debt obligations, with the exception of state-owned enterprise debt, was widely and easily accessible to the general public, including online.  Foreign assistance receipts, largely project-based, were neither adequately captured in the budget nor subject to the same audit and domestic oversight as other budget items.  Significant deviations between projected and actual revenues during the review period undercut the reliability of budget information.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period of time.  The criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts were outlined in law, although there have been reports of corruption and inconsistent application of regulations in practice.  Basic information on some, but not all, natural resource extraction awards was publicly available. Liberia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- making budget documents publicly available within a reasonable period of time;
- making state-owned enterprise debt publicly available;
- ensuring the budget is substantially complete and off-budget accounts are subject to adequate audit and oversight;
- producing and publishing a supplemental budget when actual revenues and expenditures do not correspond to those in the enacted budget;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- making supreme audit institution audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period of time;
- ensuring the criteria and procedures used to award natural resource extraction contracts and licenses are consistent with the requirements set by law or regulation; and
- making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Liberia 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentLiberia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                              765,996
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       216,403
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              13,493,552       <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,895,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      11,253,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             8,685,896        <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            2,377,359        <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        11,253,839
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    611,185          <F4>
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       258,831          <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  213,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        138,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.109 Fees. ( a ) There will be no charge assessed to the individual for the ASC's expense involved in searching for or reviewing the record. Copies of the ASC's records will be provided by a commercial copier at rates established by a contract between the copier and the ASC or by the ASC at the rates in § 1101.4(b)(5)(ii) of 12 CFR part 1101.
( b ) *Waiver or reduction of fees.* Whenever the Executive Director of the ASC determines that good cause exists to grant a request for reduction or waiver of fees for copying documents, he or she may reduce or waive any such fees.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Burundi

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Burundi			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Burundi 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Burundi

During the review period, the government published its enacted budget and end-of-year budget report within a reasonable period.  It did not make an executive budget proposal publicly available.  The government provided a substantially complete picture of its planned expenditures and revenue streams in publicly available budget documents, including information on financial allocations to and earnings from major state-owned enterprises.  Information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was not publicly available, timely, or comprehensive.  Natural resource revenues were not included in the budget.  Though information in the budget was not always complete, it was considered generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence but did not publish an audit report within a reasonable period.  All mining activity approved by the prior government was suspended during the review period.  The government is redrafting its mining sector regulations and will renegotiate its existing contracts under the new regulations.

Burundi’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing an executive budget proposal within a reasonable period;
- Providing timely and comprehensive information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt;
- Ensuring adequate audit and oversight for off-budget accounts;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution audits the government’s executed budget and makes audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period;
- Consistently adhering to applicable laws and regulations for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses; and
- Publishing basic information about natural resource extraction awards.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Burundi 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBurundiDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

SECOND ORDER TO FILE COMPLETE CLERK’S RECORD

Appellate case name: Ralph O. Douglas v. Joyce Booker

Appellate case number: 01-11-00026-CV

Trial court case number: 2005-80795

Trial court: 129th District Court of Harris County

The trial court clerk has filed two clerk’s records on indigence in this case. The secondfiled clerk’s record, however, is styled as a fourth clerk’s record and provides a list of documents 

“previously filed in the other Clerk’s Record.” Not all of the documents enumerated are 

contained in the only other clerk’s record that was filed in this case. The remaining documents 

were presumably filed in clerk’s records prepared for a related case, appellate cause number 01-

06-1069-CV, which records are no longer available.

As a result, on June 29, 2012, the Court ordered the trial court clerk to file the complete 

clerk’s record. The trial court clerk has requested additional clarification of what records are 

missing and still need to be filed. Therefore, the trial court clerk is ORDERED, within 10 days 

of the date of this order, to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the following 

documents: Order issued 5/17/2007; Order signed 10/23/2006; the docket sheet; Order signed 

denying final summary judgment (image number 24976094); and order transferring case to 

another district court (image number 18756588).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 22, 2012
§ 1008.3 Confidentiality of information. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, any requirement under Federal or state law regarding the privacy or confidentiality of any information or material provided to the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry or a system established by the Director under this part, and any privilege arising under Federal or state law (including the rules of any Federal or state court) with respect to such information or material, shall continue to apply to such information or material after the information or material has been disclosed to the system. Such information and material may be shared with all state and Federal regulatory officials with mortgage industry oversight authority without the loss of privilege or the loss of confidentiality protections provided by Federal and state laws.
( b ) Information or material that is subject to a privilege or confidentiality under paragraph (a) of this section shall not be subject to: ( 1 ) Disclosure under any Federal or state law governing the disclosure to the public of information held by an officer or an agency of the Federal Government or the respective state; or
( 2 ) Subpoena or discovery, or admission into evidence, in any private civil action or administrative process, unless with respect to any privilege held by the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry or by the Director with respect to such information or material, the person to whom such information or material pertains, waives, in whole or in part, in the discretion of such person, that privilege.
( c ) Any state law, including any state open record law, relating to the disclosure of confidential supervisory information or any information or material described in paragraph (a) of this section that is inconsistent with paragraph (a), shall be superseded by the requirements of such provision to the extent that state law provides less confidentiality or a weaker privilege.
( d ) This section shall not apply with respect to the information or material relating to the employment history of, and any publicly adjudicated disciplinary and enforcement action against, any loan originator that is included in the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry for access by the public.