alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2021 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2023 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 26th day of May, 2023.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 31.3


Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Barings Private Credit Corporation


pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,


as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Jonathan A. Landsberg, as Chief Financial Officer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Barings Private Credit Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ JONATHAN A. LANDSBERGJonathan A. LandsbergChief Financial OfficerFebruary 23, 2022
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0523**

**Directorate ID 2012 -**  **SW -**  **091 -** **AD AD Number 2013**  **- 23**  **- 09**  **Costs of Compliance** We estimate that this AD will affect 900 helicopters of U.S. Registry
. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. At an average labor rate of $85 per hour, replacing the nuts and washers on the sliding doors w ill require about 1 work
- hour, and required parts costs w ill be minimal, for a cost per helicopter of $85 and a total cost to U.S. operators of $76,500.
Opinion issued January 14, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00477-CV

———————————

LINH T. BUI, Appellant

V.

TRADITION BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-36996

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss, representing that they have 

settled this matter. They request that we grant their motion and dismiss the appeal 

with each party to bear its own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). No opinion 

has issued. See id. 42.1(c).
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal, with costs taxed 

against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(a)(2). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of IR  BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Fermanis
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
§ 6.7 Claims of creditors, taxation. ( a ) Effective January 1, 1958, payments of insurance to a beneficiary under a United States Government life insurance policy shall be subject to levy for taxes due the United States by such beneficiary.
( b ) The provisions of 38 U.S.C. 5301(b) which entitle the United States to collect by setoff out of benefits payable to any beneficiary under a United States Government life insurance policy do not apply to dividends being held to the credit of the insured for the payment of premiums under the provisions of section 1946 of title 38 U.S.C.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5301)
[23 FR 681, Feb. 1, 1958, as amended at 24 FR 15, Jan. 1, 1959; 24 FR 582, Jan. 27, 1959; 46 FR 57043, Nov. 20, 1981. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29024, 29025, June 7, 1996]
§ 17.124 Preparation of claims. Claims for costs of services not previously authorized shall be on such forms as shall be prescribed and shall include the following: ( a ) The claimant shall specify the amount claimed and furnish bills, vouchers, invoices, or receipts or other documentary evidence establishing that such amount was paid or is owed, and
( b ) The claimant shall provide an explanation of the circumstances necessitating the use of community medical care, services, or supplies instead of Department of Veterans Affairs care, services, or supplies, and
( c ) The claimant shall furnish such other evidence or statements as are deemed necessary and requested for adjudication of the claim.
[33 FR 19011, Dec. 20, 1968, as amended at 39 FR 1844, Jan. 15, 1974. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0745

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RONALD LEWIS AMELINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 27, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0745
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LANCE GREENAWALT,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADAMS 

COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 119 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Mozambique

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Mozambique			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mozambique 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Mozambique

The government made significant progress by making topline information on debt obligations, including bilateral debt and state-owned enterprise debt, publicly available within a reasonable period of time.  During the review period, the government did not publish its enacted budget within a reasonable period of time.  It did make its executive budget proposal and end-of-year report publicly available online.  Publicly available budget documents provided an incomplete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, especially allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises, which generally did not have publicly available audited financial statements.  The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to audit or oversight.  For portions of the budget that were relatively complete, information was generally considered reliable.  The supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence.  It reviewed the government’s accounts, and its reports were published within a reasonable period of time.  The criteria and procedures for natural resource extraction were specified in law and appeared to be followed in practice. The government published basic information on natural resource extraction awards.  The country is in the process of establishing a sovereign wealth fund that discloses its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals. Mozambique’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing its enacted budget within a reasonable period of time;
- ensuring budget documents include more detailed information on allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises;
- making audited financial statements for significant, large state-owned enterprises publicly available; and
- subjecting off-budget accounts to adequate audit and oversight.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Mozambique 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMozambique

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 13.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002





The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 of Stevanato Group S.p.A. (the “Annual Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





I, Marco Dal Lago, Chief Financial Officer of Stevanato Group S.p.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), of the Exchange Act; and




(2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stevanato Group S.p.A.






|       |               |                        
|------ | ------------- | -----------------------
|       |               |                        
|Dated: | March 8, 2022 | /s/ Marco Dal Lago     
|       |               | Marco Dal Lago         
|       |               | Chief Financial Officer







| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 









---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,211-01

EX PARTE JEREMY DILLON SPENCER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-13-8384 IN THE 1 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and was sentenced to thirteen years’

imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal for want of jurisdiction. Spencer

v. State, No. 12-19-00310-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 17, 2019)(not designated for publication). 

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to investigate

his alibi and failed to investigate his competence and mental health history. Applicant has alleged

facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent,

393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial
2

court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

This Court remanded this application June 17, 2020, ordering the trial court to obtain a

response from counsel. However, the trial court has sent the Court findings without obtaining a

response from counsel. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial

court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

trial counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for

counsel’s alleged deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and

conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 9, 2020

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 10.2



	 
	
1








	





 



 

	 
	
2








	





 



 

	 
	
3








	





 



 

	 
	
4








	





 



 

	 
	
5








	





 



 

6
Filed 8/18/22 In re Diaz CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re

ANTONIO DIAZ,

On Habeas Corpus.

F084549

(Kern Super. Ct. No. SF019775B)

OPINION

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

Central California Appellate Program and Bradley A. Bristow, for Petitioner.

-ooOooPetitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the doctrine of 

constructive filing. (In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 81–82.) The Attorney General 

was provided the opportunity to respond and was notified that “[t]he failure to file a 

response shall be deemed agreement that petitioner should be granted, without further 

proceedings, a belated appeal.” The time to respond has elapsed, and the Attorney 

General did not provide a response. Petitioner, in his declaration, provided his statements 

under the penalty of perjury regarding his conversations near the time of sentencing 

during which counsel agreed to file a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.

* Before Detjen, Acting P. J., Smith, J. and DeSantos, J.
2

DISPOSITION

Petitioner is granted leave to file a notice of appeal on or before 60 days from the 

date of this order in Kern County Superior Court action No. SF019775B.

Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Clerk of the Kern County Superior Court 

to file said request in its action No. SF019775B, to treat it as timely filed, and to proceed 

with the preparation of the record on appeal in accordance with the applicable rules of the 

California Rules of Court if the clerk of that court receives said request on or before 60 

days of the date of this order.

This opinion is final forthwith as to this court.
**
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James McCullough, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Renalytix AI plc;

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; and 

 
 b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: October 27, 2020  By: 
/s/ James McCullough
         James McCullough         Chief Executive Officer**