alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2285]



[[Page 6027]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL08-80-003]


American Electric Power Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

January 28, 2009.
    Take notice that on January 26, 2009, American Electric Power 
Service Corporation, on behalf of AEP East and AEP West Companies filed 
a refund report, pursuant to the Commission's November 26, 2008 Order, 
Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma v. American Electric 
Power Company, 125 FERC ] 61,237 (2008) (the November 26 Order) and the 
Notice of Extension of Time issued December 18, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b5b6a1b0bc9d9f9a9d96a08683839c8187b395968190dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 17, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2285 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6561

JAMES DONNIE SKELTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN L. LAMANNA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (9:06-cv-00247-GRA) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Donnie Skelton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Donnie Skelton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § § 2241 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Skelton that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a dis trict court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Skelton failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see alsoThomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Skelton has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARROWHEAD ECD PROPERTIES, LLC

v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST

PIKELAND TOWNSHIP

v.

MARY PATRICIA BRANDOLINI

PETITION OF: ARROWHEAD ECD PROPERTIES, LLC :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 464 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

## Fact Sheet

Public Affairs Division – Washington, DC

At The Frontline Against Violent Crime

June 2008

www.atf.gov

Contact: ATF Public Affairs Division

(202) 648-8500

### “Don’t Lie For The Other Guy” Campaign

#### Purpose

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has partnered with the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF)-the trade association for the firearms industry-in designing an educational program to assist firearm retailers in the detection and possible deterrence of “straw purchases,” the illegal purchase of a firearm by one person for another. The Department of Justice’s Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative has enhanced the program by providing funding to raise public awareness of the criminality involved in purchasing a firearm for a prohibited person.

#### Goals

The goal of the “Don’t Lie for the Other Guy” program is to reduce firearm straw purchases at the retail level and to educate would-be straw purchasers of the penalties of knowingly participating in an illegal firearm purchase. The denial of guns to prohibited persons is critical to the mission of ATF in preventing violent crime and protecting the nation.

#### Strategy/Results

ATF, in partnership with NSSF, has conducted more than 60 firearms retailer educational seminars to better inform and train several thousand Federal firearms licensees (FFL) in detecting and deterring illegal straw purchases.

NSSF has distributed Don’t Lie retailer education kits to more than 34,000 firearms retailers and to gun show promoters and pawn shops.

The program encourages licensees to work closely with their local ATF office to deter straw purchases. Residents in ATF-selected areas are made aware of the program’s message through billboard advertising, radio and TV public service announcements, as well as through media coverage of news conferences attended by U.S. Attorneys, ATF, law enforcement and representatives from the firearms industry. The combination of retailer education and public awareness components sends a powerful message to deter straw purchases.

In 2008-2009, the revamped campaign is being released in six cities.  ATF and NSSF expanded the campaign to include alerting potential straw purchasers of the penalties of buying a gun for someone who cannot or will not buy one for themselves.  This new consumer awareness program reinforces the message that buying a gun for someone who is prohibited is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.  The revised campaign includes public service radio announcements, highway bill boards, and high-profile signage at transit bus stops and on the sides of buses.

For more information on ATF’s programs, please visit the website at www.atf.gov.

###
----

# Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

      -  Home
      -  About
      -  Search
      -  List All

National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

 System Details :

System requirements: Microcomputer with Pentium processor; minimum 16MB RAM; Windows 95, 98 or NT 4.0 or greater with NT service pack 4.0 or greater operating system; MS mouse or equivalent pointing device; hard disk with 40MB available; CD-ROM drive; VGA color monitor with resolution 640 x 480; Windows-supported graphics-capable printer.

 Notes :

Survey data is accessible through the Statistical Export and Tabulation System (SETS)--retrieval software, which accompanies each issue.Corrected ed. also issued for 1990 (also dated July 1994).Summaries of the data contained in this CD-ROM publication are available in: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ... summary, United States; and: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ... summary (Advance data).

 Subject Headings :

              National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (U.S.)             -- DatabasesPhysician services utilization -- United States -- Statistics -- DatabasesAmbulatory medical care -- Utilization -- United States -- Statistics -- Databases

 Record Info : 

(OCoLC)ocm31251342(OCoLC)31251342

      Indiana University Catalog Information

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.11 1995

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.14 1996

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.2 1990 rev. 1994

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.24 1998

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.3 1991

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.4 1992

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.6 1993

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

## HE 20.6209/4-5: 13/ no.8 1994

Installation Notes :

        -  Download :     Browse   

Raw Mets Record

----

IU Bloomington Libraries

           Comments: libgpd@indiana.edu

  			Hosted by the IU Digital Library Program

----

        - Copyright  © 				    
2012
 				The Trustees of  Indiana University
        - Copyright Complaints
        - Libraries Privacy Policy
        - Accessibility Help
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.140 Dietary services. The facility management must provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets the daily nutritional and special dietary needs of each resident. ( a ) *Staffing.* The facility management must employ a qualified dietitian either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis. ( 1 ) If a dietitian is not employed, the facility management must designate a person to serve as the director of food service who receives at least a monthly scheduled consultation from a qualified dietitian.
( 2 ) A qualified dietitian is one who is qualified based upon registration by the Commission on Dietetic Registration of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
( b ) *Sufficient staff.* The facility management must employ sufficient support personnel competent to carry out the functions of the dietary service.
( c ) *Menus and nutritional adequacy.* Menus must— ( 1 ) Meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences;
( 2 ) Be prepared in advance; and
( 3 ) Be followed.
( d ) *Food.* Each resident receives and the facility provides— ( 1 ) Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance;
( 2 ) Food that is palatable, attractive, and at the proper temperature;
( 3 ) Food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs; and
( 4 ) Substitutes offered of similar nutritive value to residents.
( e ) *Therapeutic diets.* Therapeutic diets must be prescribed by the primary care physician.
( f ) *Frequency of meals.* ( 1 ) Each resident receives and the facility provides at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community.
( 2 ) There must be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and the availability of breakfast the following day, except as provided in (f)(4) of this section.
( 3 ) The facility staff must offer snacks at bedtime daily.
( 4 ) When a nourishing snack is provided at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day.
( g ) *Assistive devices.* The facility management must provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them.
( h ) *Sanitary conditions.* The facility must— ( 1 ) Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by Federal, State, or local authorities;
( 2 ) Store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions; and
( 3 ) Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1741-1743)
[65 FR 968, Jan. 6, 2000, as amended at 83 FR 61276, Nov. 28, 2018]
CTRX.EX10.1 2015Q1






Exhibit 10.1 


Amendment No. 4 to the Catamaran Corp.
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan


WHEREAS, Catamaran Corporation (the “Company”) has adopted and maintains the Catamaran Corp. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 15.2 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	The following new Article 26 is hereby added to read in its entirety as follows:




ARTICLE 26 – Suspension of Plan


26.1  Effective as of the close of business on March 31, 2015, all future payroll deductions under the Plan shall be suspended and no Common Shares may be purchased under the Plan with respect to any Purchase Period beginning after March 31, 2015; provided, however, if the Arrangement Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2015, by and among the Company, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota, USA, and 1031387 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, an unlimited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, shall terminate without consummation of the transactions contemplated thereunder, then the Plan shall resume in accordance with its terms with respect to the first Purchase Period commencing after the date on which the Arrangement Agreement is terminated, without regard to this Article 26.


In all other respects, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


As adopted by the Board of Directors of Catamaran Corp. on March 29, 2015.
Exhibit 10.5 Q1'15






Exhibit 10.5


ZELTIQ Aesthetics, Inc. 
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
Effective:  July 17, 2014


Each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ZELTIQ Aesthetics, Inc. (“ZELTIQ”) who is not also serving as an employee of ZELTIQ or any of its subsidiaries (each such member, a “Non-Employee Director”) will receive the following compensation for his or her Board service:


Cash Compensation - Annual Retainers


Non-Employee Director:  $40,000 


Chairman of the Audit Committee:  $14,000 


Audit Committee Member (other than Chairman):  $6,000 


Chairman of the Compensation Committee:  $10,000 


Compensation Committee Member (other than Chairman):  $4,500 


Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:  $6,000 


Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member (other than Chairman):  $3,000 
_________________
All retainers for committee service are in addition to the retainer as a Non-Employee Director 


All retainers are paid quarterly in arrears, and will be pro rated for service for a portion of the quarter


Equity Compensation


The equity compensation set forth below will be granted under ZELTIQ’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  All equity compensation granted under this policy will be Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). 


1.    Initial Grant:  On the date in which a Non-Employee Director(s) is appointed to the Board of Directors, each Non-Employee Director will automatically, and without further action by the Board, be granted RSUs to acquire the number of shares of ZELTIQ common stock which shall equal two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) divided by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) per share of ZELTIQ common stock as of the date of appointment, and rounding down to the next whole share. Such RSUs of ZELTIQ common stock shall vest monthly over three (3) years, subject to the Non-Employee Director’s continuous Service.


2.    Annual Grant:  On the date of each ZELTIQ annual meeting of stockholders, each Non-Employee Director will automatically, and without further action by the Board, be granted RSUs to acquire the number of shares of ZELTIQ common stock which shall equal one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) divided by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) per share of ZELTIQ common stock as of the date of appointment, and rounding down to the next whole share. Such RSUs of ZELTIQ common stock, shall vest monthly over one (1) year, provided that such RSUs shall in any event become fully vested on the day immediately preceding the next annual meeting of stockholders, subject to the Non-Employee Director’s continuous Service.  


3.    Acceleration of Vesting.  Each of the Initial Grant and the Annual Grant will be subject to acceleration of vesting in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan) as set forth in Section 13.2 of the Plan.
#### § 59.122 Withdrawal of application.

A State representative may withdraw an application by submitting to VA a written document requesting withdrawal.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)
EXHIBIT 21


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            State of 
                                                             Percent      Incorporation
                                                               of              or
      Parent                         Subsidiary             Ownership     Organization
-------------------          --------------------------     ---------     -------------

<S>                          <C>                               <C>           <C>
FFY Financial Corp.          First Federal Savings Bank        100%          Federal
                              of Youngstown

FFY Financial Corp.          FFY Holdings, Inc.                100%          Ohio

FFY Holdings, Inc.           First Real Estate, Ltd.            67%          Ohio

First Federal Savings        Ardent Service Corporation        100%          Ohio
Bank of Youngstown

Ardent Service Corporation   Hedgerows Development, Ltd.        50%          Ohio
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, James T. Posillico provides the following certification.

     I, James T. Posillico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitro
Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company") certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14)
          for the registrant and have designed such disclosure controls and
          procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company
          is made know to me by others, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
          auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
          performing the equivalent functions):

          a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial date
               and have identified for the Company's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls, and

          b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees which have a significant role in the Company's
               internal controls; and

     6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
          significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could
          significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my
          most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
          to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2006
                                               /s/ James T. Posillico
                                               ----------------------
                                               James T. Posillico, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
October 26, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONALD E. KILPATRICK, Appellant

NO. 14-17-00356-CV V.

NOBLE CAPITAL SERVICING LLC, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on February 22, 2017. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Donald E. Kilpatrick.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.