alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                CERTIFICATION
          Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Robert Muniz, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Beeper Plus, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
    prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of the registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
    quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
    controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
    controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
    weaknesses.

Dated:  September 11, 2003

/s/Robert Muniz
----------------
Robert Muniz
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2601 

To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees 

to administer and enforce the provisions relating to the ‘‘Do-not-call’’ 

registry of the Telemarketing Sales Rule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. PITTS, 

Mr. RUSH, Mr. PICKERING, and Mr. BURGESS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission 

to collect fees to administer and enforce the provisions 

relating to the ‘‘Do-not-call’’ registry of the Telemarketing Sales Rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FEE COLLECTION AUTHORITY. 

4 Section 2 of the ‘‘Do-not-call’’ Implementation Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 6101 note) is amended by striking ‘‘through 

6 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2012’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-1026 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Support 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GERMANY 

Amending and Extending the 

Agreement of April 18, 1995 

Signed at Koblenz and Arlington 

October 12 and 26, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GERMANY 

 Defense: Support 

 Agreement amending and extending the 

 agreement of April 18, 1995. 

 Signed at Koblenz and Arlington 

 October 12 and 26, 2005; 

 Entered into force October 26, 2005.
#### § 1270.17 Liability of Banks, FHFA, Office of Finance and Federal Reserve Banks.

The Banks, FHFA, the Director, the Office of Finance and the Federal Reserve Banks may rely on the information provided in a tender, transaction request form, other transaction documentation, or Transfer Message, and are not required to verify the information. Neither the Banks, FHFA, the Director, the Office of Finance, the United States, nor the Federal Reserve Banks shall be liable for any action taken in accordance with the information set out in a tender, transaction request form, other transaction documentation, or Transfer Message, or evidence submitted in support thereof.
# Official Journal C 130/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 130 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6414 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 130

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6414 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 130/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9221 — CMA CGM/CEVA) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 130/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9221 — CMA CGM/CEVA) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 130/02 | Euro exchange rates — 13 April 2021 | 2 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2021/C 130/03 | Special Report 5/2021 – Infrastructure for charging electric vehicles: more charging stations but uneven deployment makes travel across the EU complicated | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 130/02

Euro exchange rates — 13 April 2021

2

Court of Auditors

2021/C 130/03

Special Report 5/2021 – Infrastructure for charging electric vehicles: more charging stations but uneven deployment makes travel across the EU complicated

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 130/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10225 — AES/Coatue/Schneider Electric/Uplight) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2021/C 130/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10209 — Ceravis/Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft/E-VITA JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 130/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10225 — AES/Coatue/Schneider Electric/Uplight) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2021/C 130/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10209 — Ceravis/Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft/E-VITA JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### The Van Publishing Co., Appellant, *v.*The Teachers’ Magazine Publishing Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order taxing a bill of costs and disbursements incurred by the sheriff on levy and sale.

Lyon *&*Smith, for appellant.

Philip J. Britt (Burritt S. Stone, of counsel), for respondent.

Conlan, J.

Objection is made to an item of sixty dollars for keeper’s fees. It appears that a sale was advertised for the thirteenth of February, and before the day of sale notice was sent to the plaintiff’s attorney that the sale would be postponed to February fifteenth. To this no objection was made. On the fourteenth of February, the sheriff was served with an order appointing a receiver of the defendant and enjoining sale on the fifteenth, and the sale subsequently occurred on February twenty-fourth by an order of the Supreme Court. The keepers of the sheriff were in charge of the property until February twenty-third, and the amount taxed is the reasonable allowance for such service. We cannot say that any error was committed by the sheriff, and the order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, but as the amount of the fund realized on the sale is so small, we do not think any costs should be awarded on this appeal to the prevailing party.

Hascall, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, without costs.
SERVED: JANUARY 22, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ..,·- ;c**~** J -. ·. : __

, """",

PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SKYDIVING CENTER DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-1116 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case Nos. 2014WP130012 and 2014WP130023) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List ·. ..--- i

- i, i!

,,:'--;SERVICE LIST - BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region P. 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
#### Hugh G. Kelly, Respondent, *v.*William J. Merritt Company and The Continental Real Estate Holding and Building Company, Appellants.

Appeal by the defendant, the Continental Real Estate Holding & Building Company, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Stedman & Larkin (John Larkin, of counsel), for appellant Continental Company.

John J. Brady, for respondent.

Alexander S. Andrews, for defendant W. J. Merritt Company.

Conlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

The action is brought for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff against the premises Nos. 7 and 9 West Eighteenth street, New York city; the work was done under two separate contracts, the first of which was in writing and called for work and materials in the amount of $1,050, and on which it is admitted the sum of $900 has been paid, leaving a balance of $150. The second was a verbal contract on which it was agreed that $1,200 should be paid for the work to be done and the materials furnished thereunder. On the last contract it is admitted nothing has been paid.

It is perfectly-clear to us that there can be no recovery in the present action to enforce the lien for the balance due under the first contract for the evidence is plain that the lien was not filed within the statutory time after the contract was fully completed and performed.

It has been seen that the amounts claimed to be due are not in dispute; the only remaining question for us to determine is, was the lien filed within the time fixed by law, as far as the amount due on the second contract is concerned? And we are forced to answer that question in the affirmative. An effort was made, as is disclosed by the evidence, to defeat the plaintiff’s right to a lien by several conveyances of the property, so as apparently to confuse or mislead the plaintiff as to the real ownership, and the true situation of the same, and this should not be permitted to weigh against the claim and right of plaintiff in the premises.

*797We are satisfied from a careful examination of the record that the work was not completed within the time alleged by the defendant, and that under the verbal or second contract the plaintiff acquired a good and sufficient lien upon the property by the filing of the notice on the fifteenth day of March, and which was fully within the period of ninety days after the completion of the work, as fixed by the statute.

Having reached this conclusion, it follows that the judgment against the Wm. J. Merritt Company for $1,350 should stand, and that the sum of $150, together with the interest which has been computed thereon and included in the amount of the judgment for the enforcement of the lien herein, should be deducted from the whole amount of such judgment, and as to the balance thus remaining the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

O’Dwyeb, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
**We're sorry but RePORTER doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001090425
<NAME> LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,928
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,493
<PP&E>                                       1,412,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,206,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,706
<BONDS>                                      1,611,463
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,391,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,206,945
<SALES>                                        444,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,135
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,065
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (53,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,596)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (182)
<CHANGES>                                        (767)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,535)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)


</TABLE>
#### § 128.10 Supplementary guidelines.

The policy statement found at 12 CFR 128.9 supplements this part and should be read together with this part. Refer also to the HUD Fair Housing regulations at 24 CFR parts 100 through 125, Federal Reserve Regulation B at 12 CFR part 202, and Federal Reserve Regulation C at 12 CFR part 203.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Ecuador

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Ecuador			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Ecuador 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Ecuador

During the review period, the government published its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report online within a reasonable period.The government excluded complete information on financial allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises.Budget documents were substantially complete and generally reliable.Information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available, including online.The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence, audited the government’s annual financial statements, and made its reports publicly available within a reasonable period.The government did not formally award any natural resource extraction licenses or contracts during the reporting period but specified in law or regulation procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.Basic information on pre-existing natural resource extraction license and awards was not publicly available.

Ecuador’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

-  Including financial allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises in public budget documents; and
-  Publishing basic information on natural resource extraction licenses and awards.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Ecuador 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentEcuador

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 1227.3 Scope of suspension orders. ( a ) *General.* A suspending official may issue a final suspension order to the regulated entities directing them to cease or refrain from engaging in any covered transactions with a particular person and any affiliates thereof for a specified period of time or permanently, pursuant to the requirements of this part.
( b ) *No effect on other actions by FHFA.* Nothing in this part shall limit the authority of FHFA to pursue any other regulatory or supervisory action with respect to any regulated entity or any other person and any affiliates thereof, whether instead of or in addition to any action taken under this part.
( c ) *No effect on other actions by a regulated entity.* Nothing in this part shall limit the authority of any regulated entity to take any action it determines appropriate to address risks from any person and any affiliates thereof with which it engages in covered transactions.
( d ) *No effect on residential mortgage loans secured by respondent's own personal or household residence.* A final suspension order issued pursuant to this part shall have no effect on any transaction involving a residential mortgage loan if the loan is secured by the respondent's own personal or household residence.
[78 FR 63012, Oct. 23, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 79680, Dec. 23, 2015]
```

[112th Congress Public Law 136]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 385]]

Public Law 112-136
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To correct a technical error in Public Law 112-122. <<NOTE: June 21, 
                         2012 -  [H.R. 5890]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 24 of Public Law 112-122 <<NOTE: Ante, p. 364.>>  is amended 
by striking ``4 of Public Law 109-438'' and inserting ``1(c) of Public 
Law 103-428''.

    Approved June 21, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5890:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            June 5, considered and passed House.
            June 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.34 Briefs, memoranda and statements. ( a ) *By the parties.* Until the end of the information-gathering phase of the proceeding, any party may file with the Secretary a written brief, memorandum or other statement providing factual data and policy and legal arguments regarding the matters set out in the Notice of Intention. The filing party shall simultaneously serve other parties to the proceeding with a copy of the document. No later than ten days after such service, any party may file with the Secretary a written response to the document and must simultaneously serve a copy thereof on the other parties to the proceeding. The Secretary will receive documents and responses and will place them in the public file.
( b ) *By interested persons, in non-recognition proceedings.* Until the end of the information-gathering phase of a proceeding under section 1118 of FIRREA (12 U.S.C. 3347), any person with a demonstrable, direct interest in the outcome of the proceeding may file with the Secretary a written brief, memorandum or other statement providing factual data and policy and legal arguments regarding the matters set out in the Notice of Intention. The ASC's Chairperson or his or her designee may not accept any such written brief, memorandum or other statement if the submitting person cannot demonstrate a direct interest in the outcome of the proceeding. Upon acceptance of the written brief, memorandum or other statement, the Secretary shall make copies of the document and forward one copy thereof to each party to the proceeding. No later than ten days after such service, any party may file with the Secretary a written response to the document and must simultaneously serve one copy thereof on the other parties to the proceeding. The Secretary will place a copy of such briefs, memoranda, statements and responses in the public file.
"'STmIcm 

62. Deed Indian Hill (September 9,1877) 
APPROXIMATE SCALE 

0 3 6Mib 

LEGEND