alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1 Contracts 2015






Exhibit 10.1
FORM OF EXTENSION OF TERM
OF EMPLOYMENT PERIOD
MEMORANDUM




		
	To:
	     


		
	From:
	Patricia Smith Lawler,


EVP/Human Resources Division
		
	Re:
	Extension of Employment Period


		
	Date:
	May ___, 2015


The Board of Directors of BankFinancial Corporation (the “Company”) and its Human Resources Committee have completed their annual review of your Employment Agreement with the Company dated                     , as amended, and have determined to offer to amend your Employment Agreement to extend the term of the “Employment Period” as referenced in Section 2(a) of your Employment Agreement to                     .
If you are agreeable to amending your Employment Agreement as provided above, please sign and date this document in the space indicated below and return it to me by no later than _________________. 
If you do not sign and return this document to me by such date, the term of your Employment Period and the Anniversary Date applicable to your Employment Agreement will remain unchanged. 


		
	Name:
	     




		
	Signature:
	     




		
	Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2688 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2688

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, as the ``Dolph Briscoe, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOLPH BRISCOE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dolph Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dolph 
Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2688

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, as the ``Dolph Briscoe, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
```

[112th Congress Public Law 112]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 333]]

Public Law 112-112
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the ``Tomball 
     Veterans Post Office''. <<NOTE: May 15, 2012 -  [H.R. 2660]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TOMBALL VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tomball Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomball 
Veterans Post Office''.

    Approved May 15, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2660:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Nov. 14, 16, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Apr. 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 273

      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2007

  Mr. Camp of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Oberstar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF APPLICABILITY OF SUNSET OF THE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND 
              TAX RELIEF RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2001 WITH RESPECT TO 
              ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to the amendments made by section 202 of such 
Act (relating to expansion of adoption credit and adoption assistance 
programs).
                                 <all>
```
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Lesotho

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Lesotho			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho

During the review period, the government made significant progress by making its budget proposal and enacted budget publicly available in a reasonable period.  The government did not, however, publish an end-of-year report in a reasonable period.  The government also made significant progress by publishing information on debt obligations, including state-owned enterprise debt, within a reasonable period.  Budget documents provided a mostly complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, including natural resource revenues.  According to budget executive reports and end-of-year reports, actual revenues and expenditures did not reasonably correspond to those in the enacted budget.  The supreme audit institution met international standards of independence and published audits that covered the entire budget and contained substantive findings.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not publicly available.

Lesotho’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing an end-of-year report online within a reasonable period;
- Ensuring actual revenues and expenditures correspond with those in the enacted budget;
- Making expenditures to support executive offices publicly available; and
- Making basic information on natural resource extraction publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentLesotho

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 78.10 Eligible individuals. ( a ) To be an eligible individual under this part, a person must be at risk of suicide and further meet the definition of eligible individual in section 201(q) of Public Law 116-171.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, risk of suicide means exposure to, or the existence of, any of the following factors, to any degree, that increase the risk for suicidal ideation and/or behaviors: ( 1 ) Health risk factors, including mental health challenges, substance use disorder, serious or chronic health conditions or pain, and traumatic brain injury.
( 2 ) Environmental risk factors, including prolonged stress, stressful life events, unemployment, homelessness, recent loss, and legal or financial challenges.
( 3 ) Historical risk factors, including previous suicide attempts, family history of suicide, and history of abuse, neglect, or trauma, including military sexual trauma.
Note 1 to paragraph ( b
):
Grantees must use these risk factors and the impact thereof to determine the degree of risk of suicide for eligible individuals using a screening tool approved by the Department. The degree of risk depends on the presence of one or more suicide risk factors and the impact of those factors on an individual's mental health and wellbeing.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection provisions in this section under control number 2900-0904) [87 FR 13835, Mar. 10, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 62663, Aug. 1, 2024]
§ 1206.4 Increased costs of regulation. ( a ) *Increase for inadequate capitalization.* The Director may, at his or her discretion, increase the amount of a semiannual payment allocated to a Regulated Entity that is not classified as adequately capitalized to pay additional estimated costs of regulation of that Regulated Entity.
( b ) *Increase for enforcement activities.* The Director may, at his or her discretion, adjust the amount of a semiannual payment allocated to a Regulated Entity to ensure that the Regulated Entity bears the estimated costs of enforcement activities under the Act related to that Regulated Entity.
( c ) *Additional assessment for deficiencies.* At any time, the Director may make and collect from any Regulated Entity an assessment, payable immediately or through increased semiannual payments, to cover the estimated amount of any deficiency for the semiannual period as a result of increased costs of regulation of a Regulated Entity due to its classification as other than adequately capitalized, or as a result of enforcement activities related to that Regulated Entity. Any amount remaining from such additional assessment and the semiannual payments at the end of any semiannual period during which such an additional assessment is made shall be deducted *pro rata* (based upon the amount of the additional assessments) from the assessment for the following semiannual period for that Regulated Entity.
Specimen Stock Certificate

     Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware




 POWERNOMICS ENTERPRISE CORPORATION

     Total Authorized Issue
     50,000,000 Shares Par Value $.0001 Each
     Common Stock

This is to certify that is the owner of fully paid and non-assessable shares of
the above corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the
holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the
Certificate properly endorse.
Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.


Dated                           Secretary                President



<PAGE>
AllenPhyschemEffluent:QuestionableMercuryResultsResultshaving"<‐‐>"inthecolumntotheleftindicatestheparameterwasnotdetectedabovethelaboratorydetectionlimitLabFileName SampleDate BDLBio2EffMercury(ppb)Prism09‐DEC‐019312/29/09 0.71ShealyEnv 10‐JAN‐0051 01/11/10 0.092
§ 4.88a Chronic fatigue syndrome. ( a ) For VA purposes, the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome requires: ( 1 ) new onset of debilitating fatigue severe enough to reduce daily activity to less than 50 percent of the usual level for at least six months; and
( 2 ) the exclusion, by history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, of all other clinical conditions that may produce similar symptoms; and
( 3 ) six or more of the following: ( i ) acute onset of the condition,
( ii ) low grade fever,
( iii ) nonexudative pharyngitis,
( iv ) palpable or tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes,
( v ) generalized muscle aches or weakness,
( vi ) fatigue lasting 24 hours or longer after exercise,
( vii ) headaches (of a type, severity, or pattern that is different from headaches in the pre-morbid state),
( viii ) migratory joint pains,
( ix ) neuropsychologic symptoms,
( x ) sleep disturbance.
( b ) [Reserved]
[59 FR 60902, Nov. 29, 1994]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7142

BRUCE RICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

M. E. RAY, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, ESTILL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-120-6)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Rice appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We recently upheld the

Bureau of Prisons’ policy of denying a sentence reduction under 18

U.S.C.A. § 3621(e) (West Supp. 1998) to a prisoner serving a sentence for felony possession of a firearm. See Pelissero v. United

States, ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 559663, at *3-6 (4th Cir. Sept. 3,

1998) (No. 97-6156). Rice currently is incarcerated pursuant to a

conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Under

Pelissero, he is not entitled to the sentence reduction contemplated by § 3621(e)(2)(B). We therefore affirm the decision of the

district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 51/1 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 51 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 491 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 51

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 491 March 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 051/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 051/2 | Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in Russia: change of the name of a company from which an undertaking was accepted | 2 |
| 2006/C 051/3 | Group of experts on the property consequences of marriage and other forms of union and on succession and wills in the European Union (‘PRM-III/IV’) | 3 |
| 2006/C 051/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3786 — BPI/Euler Hermes/COSEC) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 051/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4130 — ENI/Grupo Amorim/CGD/Galp) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 051/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4101 — Matlin Patterson/Deutsche Bank/Michel Thierry) (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 051/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 051/2

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in Russia: change of the name of a company from which an undertaking was accepted

inter alia

2

2006/C 051/3

Group of experts on the property consequences of marriage and other forms of union and on succession and wills in the European Union (‘PRM-III/IV’)

3

2006/C 051/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3786 — BPI/Euler Hermes/COSEC) (1)

4

2006/C 051/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4130 — ENI/Grupo Amorim/CGD/Galp) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

2006/C 051/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4101 — Matlin Patterson/Deutsche Bank/Michel Thierry) (1)

6

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 051/7 | P-São Miguel: operation of scheduled air services — Invitation to tender issued by the Autonomous Region of the Azores under Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 in respect of the operation of scheduled air services within the Autonomous Region of the Azores (1) | 7 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 051/7

P-São Miguel: operation of scheduled air services — Invitation to tender issued by the Autonomous Region of the Azores under Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 in respect of the operation of scheduled air services within the Autonomous Region of the Azores (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 1222.1 Purpose and scope.

This subpart cross-references the requirement that creditors extending credit in the form of higher-priced mortgage loans comply with Section 129H of the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. 1639h, and its implementing regulations in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.35. Neither the Banks nor the Enterprises are subject to Section 129H of TILA or 12 CFR 1026.35. Originators of higher-priced mortgage loans, including Bank members and institutions that sell mortgage loans to the Enterprises, are subject to those provisions. A failure of those institutions to comply with Section 129H of TILA and 12 CFR 1026.35 may limit their ability to sell such loans to the Banks or Enterprises or to pledge such loans to the Banks as collateral, to the extent provided in the parties' agreements.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.1

                               RETAINER AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is by and between Henry D. Coleman and R. Neil Sudol of
Coleman Sudol, LLP, having a business address at 708 Third Avenue, Fourteenth
Floor, New York, New York 10017-4101, (hereinafter "LAWYERS") and CRYO-CELL
International, Inc. (hereinafter "CLIENT"), a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware and having a business address at 3165
McMullen Booth Road, Bldg. B, Clearwater, Florida 33761,

         WHEREAS LAWYERS practice law in the area of intellectual property,
including, but not limited to, patent, trademark, unfair competition, trade
secret, and copyright law.

         WHEREAS CLIENT, an international technology company, requires patent
counsel on a continuing basis for purposes of advising company employees as to
intellectual property affairs, including, but not limited to, patent, trademark,
unfair competition, trade secret, and copyright issues.

         WHEREAS CLIENT has utilized the professional services of LAWYERS, for
nine years and wishes to continue using those services.

         Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows:

         1.   CLIENT will continue to request advice and other legal services
              from LAWYERS, as the need arises in the course of CLIENT'S
              business.

         2.   LAWYERS will provide professional services to CLIENT in response
              to requests for such services from CLIENT.

         3.   LAWYERS will invoice CLIENT for services rendered and
              out-of-pocket expenses incurred as services are performed and
              expenses incurred.

         4.   On request by LAWYERS, CLIENT will issue stock to LAWYERS
              individually in equal amounts to collectively equal or exceed
              invoiced amounts outstanding, the number of shares of stock being
              sufficient at the then current market prices so that an immediate
              sale of the issued stock by LAWYERS will eliminate the accrued
              debt owed to LAWYERS by CLIENT.

         5.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, CLIENT has the option, on any
              request made by LAWYERS under Paragraph 4 above, to settle the
              invoiced amounts outstanding partially or totally by a cash
              payment to LAWYERS.

         6.   This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party.
              Upon termination, amounts owed by CLIENT to LAWYERS will be
              settled pursuant to Paragraph 4 or 5 above.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or have caused this
         Agreement to be executed, in duplicate, by themselves or their
         respective duly authorized representatives.





                                       6