alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 10, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01383-CV

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 

BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., HOME EQUITY ASSET TRUST 2004-4, 

HOME EQUITY PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-4, Appellant

V.

DEMETRIA AMARO AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 311 NORTH RAVINIA 

DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75211, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-04360-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

This is an appeal from a judgment for possession of property in a forcible detainer suit. 

Appellees move to dismiss for mootness. They assert they have vacated the property, and 

appellant has confirmed they have. Accordingly, we grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s 

judgment, and dismiss the case as moot. See Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 

S.W.3d 782, 788 (Tex. 2006).

131383F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
Court 

S

of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE 

FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE 

SECURITIES CORP., HOME EQUITY 

ASSET TRUST 2004-4, HOME EQUITY 

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, 

SERIES 2004-4, Appellant

No. 05-13-01383-CV V.

DEMETRIA AMARO AND ALL OTHER 

OCCUPANTS OF 311 NORTH RAVINIA 

DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75211, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-04360-A.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. 

Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Demetria Amaro and all other occupants of 311 North 

Ravinia Drive, Dallas, Texas 75211 recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant US 

Bank National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., 

Home Equity Asset Trust 2004-4, Home Equity Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-4.

Judgment entered this 10th day of April, 2014.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
```

[112th Congress Public Law 114]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 336]]

Public Law 112-114
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, as the ``William T. 
  Trant Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: May 15, 2012 -  [H.R. 2767]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILLIAM T. TRANT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``William T. Trant Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William T. 
Trant Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 15, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2767:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Dec. 12, 13, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Apr. 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1012.215 Notice of proceedings subsequent to effective date. A proceeding pursuant to § 1010.45(b)(1) of this chapter is commenced by issuance and service of a notice which shall contain: ( a ) A clear and accurate identification of the filing or filings to which the notice relates.
( b ) A clear and concise statement of material facts, sufficient to inform the respondent with reasonable definiteness of the statements, omissions, conduct, circumstances or practices alleged to constitute the grounds for the proposed suspension order under § 1010.45(b)(1) of this chapter.
( c ) A notice of hearing rights of the developer under § 1012.220 and of the procedures for invoking those rights.
( d ) Designation of the administrative law judge appointed to preside over pre-hearing procedures and over the hearings.
( e ) A notice that failure to file an answer conforming to the requirements of § 1081.201(b) and (c) will result in an order suspending the Statement of Record.
**Exhibit 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the    “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Thomas P. Benson,    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the    Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,    as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.      By: /s/  Thomas    P. Benson    Thomas P. Benson*Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and**Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*     Dated: November 8, 2007
#### Jacob Hertz, Landlord-Respondent, *v.*Conrad Schmidt, Tenant-Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1900.)

Summary proceedings in New York city — Jurisdiction not lost by adjournment on trial.

A justice of the Municipal Court of the city of New York does not lose jurisdiction of summary proceedings merely because, at the request of one party, he granted an adjournment after the commencement of the trial, where the adjournment did not exceed ten days.

Appeal from final order in summary proceedings of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.

August P. Wagener, for appellant.

H. S. Levy, for respondent.

O’Gorman, J.

Plaintiff’s contention that the court below lost jurisdiction by permitting an adjournment after the commencement of the trial is not well taken. Trials in the Municipal Court are conducted the same as in courts of record (Consol. Act, § 1381), and a justice of the Municipal Court now has the power possessed by a justice of a court of record with respect to the adjournment of a trial, excepting that the trial of an action cannot be adjourned for a longer period than eight days (Consol. Act, § 1362), *726and the trial of a summary proceeding cannot be adjourned for a longer period than ten days (Code Civ. Pro., § 2248), unless by consent. In Boller v. Mayor, 40 N. Y. Super. Ct. 537, there was an unauthorized adjournment for three weeks, and in Kiernan v. Reming, 7 Civ. Pro. 311, no answer was interposed, and consequently there was no trial. These cases, therefore, do not uphold appellant’s position. Aberhall v. Roach, 3 E. D. Smith, 345, and the other cases cited by the appellant, are no longer recognized as authorities, owing to the changes which have since taken place in the law governing the Municipal Court and its procedure. Jourdan v. Healey, 19 N. Y. Supp. 240; Goff v. Vedder, 12 Civ. Pro. 358.

Final order affirmed, with costs.

Beekman, P. J., and Giegebioh, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Silverado Gold
Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending February
28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald Balletto, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ Donald Balletto        
| | ---------------------------
| | Donald Balletto            
| | Principal Financial Officer
| |                            
| | April 14, 2010             

---
§ 62.30 Supportive service: Outreach services. ( a ) Grantees must provide outreach services and use their best efforts to ensure that hard-to-reach very low-income veteran families occupying permanent housing are found, engaged, and provided supportive services.
( b ) Outreach services must include active liaison with local VA facilities, State, local, tribal (if any), and private agencies and organizations providing supportive services to very low-income veteran families in the area or community to be served by the grantee.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2044)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Partnerships for Development of 
Vaccines for Selected Pathogens.
    Date: October 27-28, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Tracy A. Shahan, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Room 3121, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 451-2606, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f480879c959c959ab49a9d959d90da9a9d9cda939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9aeee9f2fbf2fbf4daf4f3fbf3feb4f4f3f2b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23610 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 4.114


 


Maximum Guarantee
Contract


 


2014JIYINZUIQUANBAOZIDI14120746


Guarantor: LI YONG HUI 


 


Guarantee: CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : June 27, 2014


 


Guarantee Definition : To ensure multiple loans Party B (Guarantee)
has lent to Hebei Xuhua Trading Co.,Ltd., Party A (Guarantor) is willing to provide the Maximum Guarantee hereunder for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB105,000,000


 


Guarantee Term : From June 27, 2014 to December 23, 2015
§ 5.15 Procedures for issuing guidance documents. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each guidance document should clearly and prominently state that it does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract. * * * Guidance documents may include the following or similar disclaimer language: The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
( 2 ) Each guidance document should include the following information in the published guidance document: ( i ) The term guidance;
( ii ) The agency or office issuing the document;
( iii ) To what and to whom the document applies;
( iv ) The date of issuance;
( v ) The title and unique identification number of the document;
( vi ) Citation to statutory or regulatory authority that the guidance document interprets or applies;
( vii ) A short summary of the subject matter covered at the beginning of the guidance document; and
( viii ) As applicable, the guidance document being revised or replaced.
( b ) *Significant guidance documents.* VA will refer to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget, or the Administrator's designee, the question of whether a guidance document is significant. Significant guidance documents should contain the disclaimer and information described in paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, unless the Administrator of OIRA, pursuant to review under E.O. 12866, and VA agree that exigency, safety, health, or other compelling cause warrants an exemption, the following additional procedures apply: ( 1 ) The Secretary or a VA component head appointed by the President (with or without confirmation by the Senate), or by an official who is serving in an acting capacity as either of the foregoing, must approve any significant guidance document prior to issuance. This approval authority is not delegable.
( 2 ) Significant guidance documents must be submitted to OIRA for review under Executive Order 12866 prior to issuance.
( 3 ) Significant guidance documents must comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13609.
[85 FR 72570, Nov. 13, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 30184, June 7, 2021]
#### § 48.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2009-0022]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by November 
2, 2009.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Recruiting Information 
Support System (AFRISS); OMB control number 0701-0150.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3,100.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,100.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,033.
    Needs and Uses: Air Force Recruiting Service requires the 
collection of specific information on prospective Air Force enlistees 
(prospective Air Force enlistees include Active, Guard, and Reserve) 
entering the Air Force. The information is used to create the initial 
personnel record, prescreen and qualify enlistees fit for service and 
ultimately induction. The information is also collected to process 
security clearances and to record metrics to be used for demographics/
market research and system performance.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: September 21, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-23735 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Editorial Note on Part 1204
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1204 appear at 77 FR 4646, Jan. 31, 2012.

§ 1204.8 How are records secured? ( a ) *What controls must FHFA and FHFA-OIG have in place?* FHFA and FHFA-OIG must establish administrative and physical controls to prevent unauthorized access to their systems of records, unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of records, and physical damage to or destruction of records. The stringency of these controls corresponds to the sensitivity of the records that the controls protect. At a minimum, the administrative and physical controls must ensure that— ( 1 ) Records are protected from public view;
( 2 ) The area in which records are kept is supervised during business hours to prevent unauthorized persons from having access to them;
( 3 ) Records are inaccessible to unauthorized persons outside of business hours; and
( 4 ) Records are not disclosed to unauthorized persons or under unauthorized circumstances in either oral or written form.
( b ) *Is access to records restricted?* Access to records is restricted to authorized employees who require access in order to perform their official duties.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Uganda

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Uganda			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Uganda 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Uganda

During the review period, the government’s budget and information on debt obligations were widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  The budget was substantially complete and generally reliable.  However, the government did not subject the increasingly large military budget to civilian public oversight.  Auditors and legislators who review the military budget are sworn to secrecy.  The supreme audit institution reviewed the government’s accounts and made its reports publicly available.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Uganda’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Subjecting the military budget to civilian public oversight.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Uganda 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentUganda

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
#### § 48.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 48.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.
§ 200.5 Coordination with other authorities. ( a ) To the maximum extent feasible, NEPA review shall be coordinated with review of proposed actions under other environmental legal authorities, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); the Endangered Species Act (ESA); Executive Orders 11988, 11990, and 13006; and other applicable authorities.
( b ) In effecting such coordination, responsible AFRH officials will ensure that the substantive and procedural requirements of other environmental authorities are met, together with the requirements of NEPA. It will be explicitly understood that compliance with NEPA does not substitute for compliance with other environmental authorities, nor does compliance with such other authority substitute for compliance with NEPA.