alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50942

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LORETO HERNANDEZ, also known as Laredo Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-99-CR-517-OG

--------------------

August 31, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Loreto Hernandez argues that the district court erred by

denying his motion to suppress because the facts presented at the

suppression hearing show that Border Patrol agents did not have a

reasonable suspicion that Hernandez was involved in criminal

activity. In the context of the denial of a motion to suppress,

we review the district court's factual findings for clear error

and the ultimate conclusion, that the facts supported a

reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory stop,

de novo. United States v. Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716, 721 (5th Cir.
No. 99-50942

-2-

1994); United States v. Zapata-Ibarra, 212 F.3d 877, 881-82 (5th

Cir. 2000). 

 A roving Border Patrol agent may stop a vehicle if the

agent's observations lead him reasonably to suspect that the

occupants of a particular vehicle may be involved in criminal

activity. See United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 881

(1975). The factors to be taken into account in determining

whether "reasonable suspicion" exists, include: the

characteristics of the area; its proximity to the border; the

usual patterns of traffic on a particular road and previous

experience with alien traffic; information about recent illegal

border crossings; the driver's behavior; and the vehicle's

appearance, including the type vehicle, appearance of being

heavily loaded, number of passengers, or passengers' behavior. 

Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. at 884-885. 

 The facts articulated by Agent Dale show a vehicle that was

not normally in the area, that was not suited for ranch use, that

was the type used by smugglers, that was traveling a known path

for contraband, and that was apparently trying to avoid border

checkpoints. These facts are specific and were articulated in

clear terms. The district court did not err in concluding that

all of the specific facts considered together supported the stop. 

See United States v. Aldaco, 168 F.3d 148, 150 (5th Cir. 1999). 

 AFFIRMED.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 108]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 329]]

Public Law 112-108
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the ``Specialist 
    Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''. <<NOTE: May 15, 2012 -  [H.R. 
                                1423]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MICHEAL E. PHILLIPS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.

    Approved May 15, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1423:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    May 2, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Apr. 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2424 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2424

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2007

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizens Protection Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 1990 AND AMENDMENTS 
              TO THAT ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (q).
    (b) Related Amendments.--
            (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by striking 
        paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesignating paragraphs (28), 
        (29), and (32) through (35) as paragraphs (25) through (30), 
        respectively.
            (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``(k), or 
                (q)'' and inserting ``or (k)''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating 
                paragraphs (5) through (7) as paragraphs (4) through 
                (6), respectively.
            (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (18 U.S.C. 921 
        note, 922 note; section 1702 of Public Law 101-647; 104 Stat. 
        4844-4845) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.9 Waiver termination. ( a ) *Mandatory waiver termination.* The ASC shall terminate a temporary waiver Order when the ASC determines that significant delays in the performance of appraisals by certified or licensed appraisers no longer exist.
( b ) *Discretionary waiver termination.* The ASC at any time may terminate a waiver Order on the finding that the terms and conditions of the waiver Order are not being satisfied.
( c ) Publication in the Federal Register. The ASC shall publish either a mandatory or discretionary waiver termination in the Federal Register, and a discretionary waiver termination requires such publication with a 30-day comment period. In the absence of further ASC action to the contrary, a discretionary waiver termination automatically becomes final 21 calendar days after the close of the comment period. A mandatory waiver termination is final upon such a determination being made by the ASC.
42186.

#### REESE v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was charged and convicted of knowingly receiving stolen goods *(Code Ann.*§ 26-2620) on November 26, 1965. On appeal, she contends there is a fatal variance between the allegations and proof for the reason that the accusation against the principal thief, which was introduced in evidence, shows that the latter did not steal the property until November 27, 1965. The guilt of the principal thief is an essential element of the crime of receiving stolen goods, but the conviction of the principal thief is not. While the State must prove a conviction of the principal thief, if he is known and can be apprehended, as a condition precedent to proceeding against the alleged receiver of stolen goods, such proof is only prima facie establishment of the guilt of the principal tlieif. After proof of the conviction, his guilt, including the date of the offense, is in issue. There is sufficient evidence in this record to show that the principal thief was guilty of the theft of the goods received by the *316defendant, that the theft took place on November 26, 1965, and preceded the receipt by the defendant of the stolen goods. *Johnson v. State,*96 Ga. App. 151 (99 SE2d 484); cf. *Lee v. State,*8 Ga. App. 413, 418 (69 SE 310). The defendant also contends that there was no evidence showing that the defendant received the stolen goods with knowledge that they were stolen. There was evidence of facts and circumstances sufficient to support a finding that the defendant received the goods knowing them to be stolen. *Licette v. State,*75 Ga. 253, 257; *Cobb v. State,*76 Ga. 664, 666. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of the jury.

Submitted July 6, 1966

Decided September 6, 1966

Rehearing denied September 21, 1966.

*Casey Thigpen,*for appellant.

*Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
§ 1012.220 Hearings—notice of proceedings subsequent to effective date. ( a ) A developer, upon receipt of a notice of proceedings issued pursuant to § 1010.45(b)(1) of this chapter, may obtain a hearing by filing a written request in accordance with the instructions regarding such request contained in the notice of proceedings. Such a request must be filed within 15 days of receipt of the notice of proceedings and must be accompanied by an answer conforming to the requirements of § 1081.201(b) and (c).
( b ) When a hearing is requested pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, such hearing shall be held within 45 days of receipt of the request by the Director unless it is determined that it is not in the public interest. The time and place for hearing shall be fixed with due regard for the public interest and the convenience and necessity of the parties or their representatives.
( c ) Failure to answer within the time allowed by paragraph (a) of this section or failure of a developer to appear at a hearing duly scheduled shall result in an appropriate order under § 1010.45(b)(1) of this chapter suspending the statement of record. Such order shall be effective as of the date of service or receipt.
§ 1002.1 Authority, scope and purpose. ( a ) *Authority and scope.* This part, known as Regulation B, is issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) pursuant to title VII (Equal Credit Opportunity Act) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*). Except as otherwise provided herein, this subpart applies to all persons who are creditors, as defined in § 1002.2(l), other than a person excluded from coverage of this part by section 1029 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376. Information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and have been assigned OMB No. 3170-0013.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to promote the availability of credit to all creditworthy applicants without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age (provided the applicant has the capacity to contract); to the fact that all or part of the applicant's income derives from a public assistance program; or to the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The regulation prohibits creditor practices that discriminate on the basis of any of these factors. The regulation also requires creditors to notify applicants of action taken on their applications; to report credit history in the names of both spouses on an account; to retain records of credit applications; to collect information about the applicant's race and other personal characteristics in applications for certain dwelling-related loans; and to provide applicants with copies of appraisal reports used in connection with credit transactions.
[76 FR 79445, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 88 FR 35527, May 31, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of WTI Fund X, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Wanek, Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.











/s/ David R. Wanek


David R. Wanek


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: March 14, 2022
Exhibit 32(a)


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In   connection   with   the  IGENE  Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30,  2007,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F. Hiu, President of the
Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,  to
the best of my knowledge:

          (1).  The  Report fully complies with the requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
          1934, as amended; and

          (2).  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
          presents,   in   all  material  respects,  the   financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 11, 2007                 By: /S/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                            ________________________
                                                STEPHEN F. HIU
                                                President



A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
62. Dead Indian Hill (September 9.1877)
**Exhibit 32-2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul J. Malvasio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Paul J. Malvasio                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul J. Malvasio                                      |
| Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| November 4, 2004                                 |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to The Navigators Group, Inc.and will be retained by The Navigators Group, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
§ 1002.4 General rules. ( a ) *Discrimination.* A creditor shall not discriminate against an applicant on a prohibited basis regarding any aspect of a credit transaction.
( b ) *Discouragement.* A creditor shall not make any oral or written statement, in advertising or otherwise, to applicants or prospective applicants that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application.
( c ) *Written applications.* A creditor shall take written applications for the dwelling-related types of credit covered by § 1002.13(a).
( d ) *Form of disclosures* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* A creditor that provides in writing any disclosures or information required by this part must provide the disclosures in a clear and conspicuous manner and, except for the disclosures required by §§ 1002.5 and 1002.13, in a form the applicant may retain.
( 2 ) *Disclosures in electronic form.* The disclosures required by this part that are required to be given in writing may be provided to the applicant in electronic form, subject to compliance with the consumer consent and other applicable provisions of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign Act) (15 U.S.C. 7001 *et seq.*). Where the disclosures under §§ 1002.5(b)(1), 1002.5(b)(2), 1002.5(d)(1), 1002.5(d)(2), 1002.13, and 1002.14(a)(2) accompany an application accessed by the applicant in electronic form, these disclosures may be provided to the applicant in electronic form on or with the application form, without regard to the consumer consent or other provisions of the E-Sign Act.
( e ) *Foreign-language disclosures.* Disclosures may be made in languages other than English, provided they are available in English upon request.
[76 FR 79445, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 7248, Jan. 31, 2013]
Platform i.e. i.e.





Applicable Servicing Criteria





Period










| | • | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | • | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange
            Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | • | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------














/s/ James Maitland


Managing Director








Asset-backed Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform
 
 DEAL NAME  DEAL NAME
  AMCAR 2017-2  SDART 2022-7
 AMCAR 2017-3  VALET 2018-1
 AMCAR 2018-2  VALT 2019-A
 AMCAR 2018-3  VALT 2020-A
 AMCAR 2019-3  VALT 2022-A
# CA2004254EN.01000101.xml

| 14.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 254/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        747,653
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 118,447
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        16,958,250               <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                18,521,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       8,626,223                <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,571,166                <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  0
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,317,839                <F4>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 599,281                  <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            498,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  219,560
<EPS-BASIC>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGE PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
         INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 1073.102 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to implement Federal statutes and regulatory standards authorizing the Bureau to collect debts owed to the United States. This part is intended to be consistent with the following Federal statutes and regulations: ( 1 ) DCIA at 31 U.S.C. 3711 (collection and compromise of claims), section 3716 (administrative offset), section 3717 (interest and penalty on claims), and section 3718 (contracts for collection services); 31 CFR part 285 (debt collection authorities under the DCIA)
( 2 ) 31 CFR chapter IX and parts 900 through 904 (FCCS);
( 3 ) 5 U.S.C. 5514, 5 CFR part 550, subpart K (salary offset);
( 4 ) 5 U.S.C. 5584 (waiver of claims for overpayment);
( 5 ) 31 U.S.C. 3720D, 31 CFR 285.11 (administrative wage garnishment); and
( 6 ) 26 U.S.C. 6402(d), 31 U.S.C. 3720A, and 31 CFR 285.2 (tax refund offset).
#### § 20.713 Rule 713. Recording of hearing by appellant or representative.

An appellant or representative may record the hearing with his or her own equipment. Filming, videotaping or televising the hearing may only be authorized when prior written consent is obtained from all appellants and contesting claimants, if any, and made a matter of record. In no event will such additional equipment be used if it interferes with the conduct of the hearing or the official recording apparatus. In all such situations, advance arrangements must be made with the Board of Veterans' Appeals, P.O. Box 27063, Washington, DC 20038.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7107)

[84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]