alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the IGENE Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007
as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I,  Edward  J.  Weisberger, Chief Financial Officer of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best  of
my knowledge:

          (1).  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
          1934, as amended; and

          (2).   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 11,  2007             By:  /S/EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                          ___________________________
                                             EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A  signed original of this written statement required by Section  906
has  been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF
                            THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT


     In conjunction with the annual report of Sharps Compliance Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David P.
Tusa, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that

     (3)  The Form 10-KSB report for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003,
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Form 10-KSB report for the years
          ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sharps
          Compliance Corp.



By:  /s/  DAVID P. TUSA

David P. Tusa
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00102-CR

DOUGLAS SHANE MAREK

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CR-1917-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 7, 2014
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1304/2006

of 31 August 2006         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 25 to 31 August 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2006, the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported shall be 19,90 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 67 000 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 192, 13.7.2006, p. 11.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
# Official Journal C 132E/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 132E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 497 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 132E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 497 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 132E/1 | Common Position (EC) No 7/2006 of 10 March 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2006/C 132E/1

Common Position (EC) No 7/2006 of 10 March 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 242/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 242 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6126 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 242

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6126 September 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1283 of 24 August 2018 laying down rules on the format and timetables for the submission of annual data collection reports in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors
  (notified under document C(2018) 5270) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1283 of 24 August 2018 laying down rules on the format and timetables for the submission of annual data collection reports in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors
  (notified under document C(2018) 5270)

(notified under document C(2018) 5270)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    500,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               500,000
<PP&E>                                           6,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 506,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,210,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           225
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   506,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               884,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,410,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,410,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,413,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (62.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (62.84)
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 17, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1619

Lower Tribunal No. F18-23125

________________

Zachery McBurrows,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, 

Judge.

Zachery McBurrows, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. Zachery McBurrows appeals his conviction and sentence 

following revocation of his probation. We affirm in all respects, but remand 

for the entry of an order of revocation of probation. See Robinson v. State, 

74 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (Upon revocation of probation, the trial 

court is required to enter a written order specifying the conditions of 

probation that were violated.).
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.904 Effect of forfeiture after veteran's death. ( a ) *Fraud.* Whenever a veteran has forfeited his or her right by reason of fraud, his or her surviving dependents upon proper application may be paid pension, compensation, or dependency and indemnity compensation, if otherwise eligible. No benefits are payable to any person who participated in the fraud causing the forfeiture. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 6103(c))
( b ) *Treasonable acts.* Death benefits may be paid as provided in paragraph (a) of this section where forfeiture by reason of a treasonable act was declared before September 2, 1959, and such benefits were authorized prior to that date. Otherwise, no award of gratuitous benefits (including the right to burial in a national cemetery) may be made to any person based on any period of service commencing before the date of commission of the offense which resulted in the forfeiture. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 6104(c))
( c ) *Subversive activities.* Where the veteran was convicted of subversive activities after September 1, 1959, no award of gratuitous benefits (including the right to burial in a national cemetery) may be made to any person based on any period of service commencing before the date of commission of the offense which resulted in the forfeiture unless the veteran had been granted a pardon of the offense by the President of the United States. If pardoned, the veteran's surviving dependents upon proper application may be paid pension, compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation, if otherwise eligible, and the right to burial in a national cemetery is restored.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 6105(a))
[27 FR 8591, Aug. 28, 1962, as amended at 38 FR 30106, Nov. 1, 1973; 39 FR 13970, Apr. 19, 1974; 53 FR 16924, May 19, 1988]
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Mike McKeever, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be providedunder Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of thereports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation and Computershare Trust Company, National Association. 

Date: March 25, 2022 

 

/s/ Mike McKeever
Mike McKeeverPresidentCarvana Receivables Depositor LLC(senior officer in charge of securitization)**
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 42 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 033-83560 under the Securities Act of
1933 and Amendment No. 101 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 811-08750 under the Securities Act of 1940 of Separate Account VA BNY of our report dated April 24, 2015 relating to the financial statements of Separate Account VA BNY
and to the use of our report dated April 29, 2015 with respect to the financial statements of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement. 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
 Chicago, Illinois  

April 29, 2015 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information
and to the use of our reports: (1) dated February 6, 2015, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, (2) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the
financial statements of the subaccounts of the Separate Account VA BNY, included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 42 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-83560) and related Prospectus of Transamerica Landmark NY Variable
Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des
Moines, IA 
 April 29, 2015
#### UNITED STATES v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. R. CO.

[61 C. Cls. 1; 270 U. S. 645]

Petition for writ of certiorari *dismissed*by the Supreme Court March 4, 1926, on motion of petitioner.
#### Bernard KAHLENBERG, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 84-5196.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 29, 1986.

Sharon B. Jacobs, Miami, Fla., for petitioner.

Leon Kellner, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., James A. Hunolt, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civ. Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before RONEY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS *, Senior District Judge.

*

 Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

ORDER

In our opinion *Kahlenberg v. Ins.,*763 F.2d 1346 (11th Cir.1985), we held that Mr. Kahlenberg was statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status as an investor since his application for adjustment of status was not approved on or before June 1, 1978, so as to qualify him as a non-preference immigrant thereby exempting him from the labor certification requirements of Section 212(a)(14) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act.

Our holding was influenced, to a large extent, by our reliance upon the Immigra*1328tion Service’s interpretation of its own regulations. The Board of Immigration Appeals recently had the opportunity to address this issue in light of 8 C.F.R. § 245.1(C)(2)(iv) (1986). In *Matter of Amornvootiskul,*Case Nos. 5 [ A-XXXXXXXX ] and [ A-XXXXXXXX ], Board of, Immigration Appeals Interim Decision No. 3009 (April 1, 1986), the Board held that an alien will have qualified as a non-preference immigrant if the application for investor status was subsequently approved with a priority date on or before June 1, 1978.

Upon reconsideration of the matter, we hereby RECALL OUR MANDATE and remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for review and reconsideration in light of *Matter of Amornvootiskul, supra*and 8 C.F.R. § 245.1(c)(2)(iv)(1986). Accordingly, a stay of deportation will issue until such time as the Board of Immigration Appeals has reviewed the same pursuant to this remand.
## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

____________ No. 05-1225 M ICHAEL A. S VEUM , Petitioner-Appellant , v. J UDY P. S MITH , Respondent-Appellee.

____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 00-C-563-C— Barbara B. Crabb , Chief Judge.

____________ S UBMITTED F EBRUARY 25, 2005—D ECIDED M ARCH 31, 2005

____________

Before P OSNER , W OOD , and E VANS , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM . The district court denied Michael Sveum’s habeas corpus petition in December 2000. Four years later, Sveum filed a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) arguing that the district court had impr operly denied his petition by not holding an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Th e district court concluded that Sveum’s motion was an unauthorized successive collateral attack, dismissed the motion fo r lack of jurisdiction, and later denied Sveum’s motion for reconsideration.2 No. 05-1225 In deciding whether to grant Sveum’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the district court struggled with the issue of wh ether a petitioner who files an unauthorized collateral attack needs a certificate of appealability in order to be allowed to appeal. Jones v. Braxton ,392 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2004), holds that a district court’s dismissal of a motion on the ground that it is an unauthorized successive collateral attack co nstitutes a final order within the scope of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and therefore a certificate of appealability is required. Id. at 688. We agree. Were this not the rule, a prisoner could circumvent the certificate requirement just by labeling his succe ssive collateral attack a Rule 60(b) motion. Sveum’s Rule 60(b) motion was a mislabeled habeas corpus petition reasse rting his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Dunlap v. Litscher , 301 F.3d 873, 875 (7thCir. 2002). He must therefore obtain a certificate of appealability in order to be able to proceed. Jones v. Braxton , supra ,392 F.3d at 688. And because this is an unauthorized successive collateral attack, Sveum cannot satisfy the criteria for a certificate of appealability, so we D ENY his request for one.
A true Copy: Teste:

_____________________________ Clerk of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

USCA-02-C-0072—3-31-05
# Official Journal L 104/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 104 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6124 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 104

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6124 April 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 of 5 March 2018 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431 | 37 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/627 of 20 April 2018 correcting certain language versions of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives (
  1
  ) | 57 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 of 5 March 2018 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431

37

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/627 of 20 April 2018 correcting certain language versions of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives (
  1
  )

1

57

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.