February 25, 2002

Exemption No. 7132A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2002

- 11485

Mr. Robert W. Kneisley Associate General Counsel, Federal Affairs Southwest Airlines Company
1250 Eye Street NW, Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20005

Dear Mr. Kneisley:

This is in response to your January 15, 2002, letter petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Southwest Airlines Company (Southwest) for an extension of Exempti on No. 7132. That exemption
from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits Southwest to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC)
whil e that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training as specified in § 121.424.

In your petition, you indicate that the conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition upon which the exemption was granted, remain unchanged.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requeste d extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Southwest.

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7132 remains valid with respect to this exe mption.

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained
in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Exemption No. 7132 is hereby amen ded by extending its February 28, 2002, termination date to February 28, 2004, unless sooner superseded or
rescinded.

AFS

- 02

- 181

- E2

All other conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 7132 remain the same. This letter shall be attached to, and is a par t of, Exemption No. 7132.

Please note the FAA has assigned a new docket number to this project (Docket No. FAA

- 2002

- 11485; previously Docket No. 29836). In an effort to allow the public to participate in tracking the FAA’s rulemaking activities, we have transitioned to the Department of Transportation’s

Internet

- accessible Docket Management System (DMS), located at http://dms.dot.gov . This new system enables interested persons to submit, view, and download requests to th e DMS in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.63. Future requests should be submitted through this system.

Sincerely,

/s/ Louis C. Cusimano Acting Director, Flight Standards Service3

AFS

- 02

- 181

- E (Docket No. FAA

- 2002

- 11485) Exemption No. 7132A

MR R OBERT W KNEISLEY

ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL FEDERAL AFFAIRS

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY
1250 EYE STREET NW SUITE 1110
WASHINGTON DC 20005

Certificate Holding Region: AEA

- 200, Flight Standards Service, Eastern Region

### AFS-16-2027-E February 22, 2016



### Exemption No. 7132I Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11485

Mr. Alan Kasher Managing Director, Director of Operations Southwest Airlines Company 2702 Love Field Drive/ TOP-1DO P.O. Box 36611 Dallas, TX 75235

Dear Mr. Kasher:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7132, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision
By letter dated November 12, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Southwest Airlines Compa ny (Southwest) for an extension of Exemption No. 7132, as amended. That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Southwest to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Southwest.

### 2

Our Decision
The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7132, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, Southwest Airlines Company is granted an exemption to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying PIC while that PIC is pe rforming prescribed duties during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. A Southwest check airman or aircrew program designee may conduct a PIC observation in place of an FAA inspector when––

a. The Administrator preapproves that substitution for each observation of a qualifying PIC candidate, thus reserving first right of refusal to the FAA in each case. Southwest, therefore, must contact an appropriate FAA office, in each instance, before substituting that check airman or aircrew program designee;

b. The qualifying PIC candidate has completed no less than 10 hours of supervised operational experience (OE) and accomplished no fewer than two takeoffs and landings; and

c. The qualifying PIC candidate is performing PIC duties during a complete flight leg, including flight deck preparation, before starting engines checklist, taxi, takeoff, all other flight phases, landing, taxi, and securing checklist.

2. Each Southwest check airman or aircrew program designee conducting a PIC observation in place of an FAA inspector must––

a. Be approved by the Administrator to conduct the observation;

b. Have served as a check airman or aircrew program designee for Southwest for no less than 6 months; and

c. Not supervise the OE or conduct the initial line check for the qualifying PIC candidate being observed. d. Conduct the observation from the observer seat only (i.e. not a required flightcrew member seat).

3. Southwest must maintain student, check airman, and aircrew program designee records that demonstrate compliance with the conditions and limitations of this exemption.

### 3

The Effect of Our Decision
This exemption terminates on February 28, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service