alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 39.121 State or Tribal Organization responsibilities following project completion. ( a ) A State or Tribal Organization that has received an Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Project grant or an Operation and Maintenance Project grant shall monitor use of the cemetery by various subgroups and minority groups, including women veterans. If VA determines that under-utilization by any of these groups exists, the State or Tribal Organization shall establish a program to inform members of these groups about benefits available to them. If a significant number or portion of the population eligible to be served or likely to be directly affected by the grant program needs benefits information in a language other than English, the State or Tribal Organization shall make such information available in the necessary language.
( b ) A State or Tribal veterans cemetery that has received an Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Project grant or an Operation and Maintenance Project grant shall be operated and maintained as follows: ( 1 ) Buildings, grounds, roads, walks, and other structures shall be kept in reasonable repair to prevent undue deterioration and hazards to users.
( 2 ) The cemetery shall be kept open for public use at reasonable hours based on the time of the year.
( c ) VA, in coordination with the State or Tribal Organization, shall inspect the project for compliance with the standards set forth in subpart B of this part for Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Projects and with the standards set forth in subpart C of this part for Operation and Maintenance Projects at the project's completion and at least once in every 3-year period following completion of the project throughout the period the facility is operated as a State or Tribal veterans cemetery. The State or Tribal Organization shall forward to the Director, Veterans Cemetery Grants Service, a copy of the inspection report, giving the date and location the inspection was made and citing any deficiencies and corrective action to be taken or proposed.
( d ) Failure of a State or Tribal Organization to comply with any of paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall be considered cause for VA to suspend any payments due the State or Tribal Organization on any project until the compliance failure is corrected.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408; and E.O. 13166, 65 FR 50121)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4478, Jan. 30, 2012]
### 9 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e. g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection/Modify

Upper and Lower

Wing Skin

- t0

- Rib

A ttachments at WS

167 and WS 209. 560.0 $ 47,600.

00 

### $5,000 $ 52,600.00 

### 4 $ 210,400.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 210,400



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspec tion,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Repair (unknown) $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

### 10

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty c osts) 

### : 

### Man

- hours and

materials required to accomplish necessary repairs found during inspections per this AD will be

dependent upon extent of damage and type of repair required.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
' SEWERS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1892.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### † STATE OF OHIO EX REL. v. THOS. W. GRAYDON, ET AL.

Abutter who did not Pay Assessments may tap Upon Payment oe Eicense Fee.

An abutting proprietor has the right to tap a public sewer on payment of the license fée, without paying two dollars a foot, although the assessment for its construction was adjudged invalid, and he consequently never paid but part of it.

Mandamus.

†

This judgment was affirmed by the supreme court without report, November 21, 1893. Bradbury, Spear and Minshall, JJ„ dissent.

SMITH, J.

We are of the opinion that on the pleadings and evidence, relator is entitled to the relief prayed for, and that it comes within the ruling of this court in the case of Springmyer v. Bowler, 1 Ohio Circ. Dec. 279.

The sewer,in question is a public sewer, and under the law of the state and the ordinances of the city, the owners of lots adjacent thereto are authorized, on the payment of the license fee fixed by the statute and ordinances, and a tender of performance of all the other requirements thereof (all of which have been tendered in this case), to tap or make connection therewith, without paying the amount of $2.00 per front foot of his lot, which the city authorities seek to require him to pay, on the ground that the assessment of that amount laid upon his prop*622erty, and that of a part of the other property adjacent thereto, for the construction of the sewer, was by the judgment of the Superior Court held to be invalid, and a much larger part of the cost of the construction thereof, than was intended, was cast upon the city. The relator’s property cannot, for this reason, be in this way, in effect, assessed to the full amount allowed by the law.

Herbert Jenney, for plaintiff.

John Galvin, assistant city solicitor, for defendant.

A peremptory writ will therefore issue against the defendants requiring them to issue such license, to be delivered to relator on the payment of the regular license fees, and the fulfillment of the other requirements of the statute and ordinance.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11888 and #11889]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1858-DR), dated 09/26/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/18/2009 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/26/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/25/2009.
                        ( print page 50991) *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/28/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/26/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Carroll, Catoosa, Chattooga, Cobb, Douglas, Gwinnett, Paulding, Stephens, Walker. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 118886 and for economic injury is 118896
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-23776 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Swing Line Note, dated  August 19, 2003




 Exhibit 10.1.7 
  
 SWING LINE NOTE 
  

	 $1,000,000
	 	August 19, 2003

  
 On the Revolving
Credit Maturity Date, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, SC Merger Sub, Inc., a Texas corporation (“Company”), Research Applications, Inc. (“RAI”) and Staktek Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings” and together with the Company and RAI, the
“Borrowers’) jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Comerica Bank (“Swing Line Bank”) at Detroit, Michigan, in lawful money of the United States of America, so much of the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000), as
may from time to time have been advanced by Swing Line Bank to the Borrower and then be outstanding hereunder pursuant to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 19, 2003 by and among the Borrowers, the Banks signatories
thereto, Comerica Bank, as Administrative Agent, Documentation Agent, Structuring Agent and Lead Arranger as the same may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”), together with interest
thereon as hereinafter set forth. 
  
 Each of the Advances made
hereunder shall bear interest at the Applicable Interest Rate from time to time applicable thereto under the Credit Agreement or as otherwise determined thereunder, and interest shall be computed, assessed and payable as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. 
  
 This Note is a Swing Line Note under which Advances
of the Swing Line (including refundings and conversions), repayments and readvances may be made from time to time by Swing Line Bank, but only in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement. This Note evidences borrowings under,
is subject to, is secured in accordance with, and may be accelerated or prepaid under, the terms of the Credit Agreement, to which reference is hereby made. Capitalized terms used herein, except as defined to the contrary, shall have the meanings
given them in the Credit Agreement. 
  
 This Note shall be
interpreted and the rights of the parties shall be determined under the laws of, and enforceable in, the State of Michigan. 
  
 Borrowers hereby waive presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonor and nonpayment of this Note and agrees that no obligation hereunder
shall be discharged by reason of any extension, indulgence, release, or forbearance granted by any holder of this Note to any party now or hereafter liable hereon or any present or subsequent owner of any property, real or personal, which is now or
hereafter security for this Note. 








 Nothing herein shall limit any right granted Swing Line Bank by any other instrument or by law.

  

	SC MERGER SUB, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph C Aragona


	 	 	 Joseph C. Aragona

	 	 	 Its President

	
	STAKTEK HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph C Aragona


	 	 	 Joseph C. Aragona

	 	 	 Its President

	
	RESEARCH APPLICATIONS, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph C Aragona


	 	 	 Joseph C. Aragona

	 	 	 Its President



  
 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO SWING LINE NOTE]
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany (successor by conversion to Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2020 (as amended, the“Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Company LLC II (successor by conversion to Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II), as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 29th day of June, 2023. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum

Kevin J. Cullum

President and Chief Executive Officer

 
21 

**
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned officers and directors of Zurich Reinsurance Centre
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby severally constitute and appoint Peter
Porrino, Mark Sarlitto and Karen O'Connor Rubsam, each of them singly, as our
true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to
sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Company's
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Power of Attorney has been executed and
delivered by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                   Title                                       Date
---------                                   -----                                       ----
<S>                                         <C>                                         <C>
                                            Chairman of the Board and
/s/ Steven M. Gluckstern                    Director                                    March 28, 1997
Steven M. Gluckstern


                                            Director, President and
/s/ Richard E. Smith                        Chief Executive Officer                     March 28, 1997
Richard E. Smith

                                            Vice Chairman of the
/s/ Detlef Steiner                          Board of Directors                          March 28, 1997
Detlef Steiner

/s/ William H. Bolinder                     Director                                    March 28, 1997
William H. Bolinder

/s/ Philip Caldwell                         Director                                    March 28, 1997
Philip Caldwell

/s/ Laurence W. Cheng                       Director                                    March 28, 1997
Laurence W. Cheng

/s/ Judith Richards Hope                    Director                                    March 28, 1997
Judith Richards Hope

/s/ Rolf Hueppi                             Director                                    March 28, 1997
Rolf Hueppi

/s/ Robert T. Marto                         Director                                    March 28, 1997
Robert T. Marto

/s/ Peter J. Neff                           Director                                    March 28, 1997
Peter J. Neff


/s/ Michael D. Palm                         Director                                    March 28, 1997
Michael D. Palm

/s/ George G.C. Parker                      Director                                    March 28, 1997
George G.C. Parker
</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (the registrant).

1. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

2. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

3. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter ending
May 31, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditor and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date: July 15, 2008 | /s/
      Garry L. Anselmo 
|------------------- | ---------------------------
|                    | Garry L. Anselmo           
|                    | Principal Financial Officer

---
§ 1022.25 Reasonable and simple methods of opting out. ( a ) *In general.* You must not use eligibility information about a consumer that you receive from an affiliate to make a solicitation to the consumer about your products or services, unless the consumer is provided a reasonable and simple method to opt out, as required by § 1022.21(a)(1)(ii) of this part.
( b ) *Examples* — ( 1 ) *Reasonable and simple opt-out methods.* Reasonable and simple methods for exercising the opt-out right include: ( i ) Designating a check-off box in a prominent position on the opt-out form;
( ii ) Including a reply form and a self-addressed envelope together with the opt-out notice;
( iii ) Providing an electronic means to opt out, such as a form that can be electronically mailed or processed at a Web site, if the consumer agrees to the electronic delivery of information;
( iv ) Providing a toll-free telephone number that consumers may call to opt out; or
( v ) Allowing consumers to exercise all of their opt-out rights described in a consolidated opt-out notice that includes the privacy opt-out under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 *et seq.,* the affiliate sharing opt-out under the Act, and the affiliate marketing opt-out under the Act, by a single method, such as by calling a single toll-free telephone number.
( 2 ) *Opt-out methods that are not reasonable and simple.* Reasonable and simple methods for exercising an opt-out right *do not* include— ( i ) Requiring the consumer to write his or her own letter;
( ii ) Requiring the consumer to call or write to obtain a form for opting out, rather than including the form with the opt-out notice;
( iii ) Requiring the consumer who receives the opt-out notice in electronic form only, such as through posting at a Web site, to opt out solely by paper mail or by visiting a different Web site without providing a link to that site.
( c ) *Specific opt-out means.* Each consumer may be required to opt out through a specific means, as long as that means is reasonable and simple for that consumer.