alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   378,362
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              8,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         390,375
<PP&E>                                                 5,775,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,748,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,648,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    148,605
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,499,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,648,018
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         861,985
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            562,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          299,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      299,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             299,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1                         CERTIFICATION

    I, Robert L. Saxe, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Research Frontiers Incorporated ( "RFI" or the "Registrant"),
certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's  auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's  board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 19, 2004                /s/ Robert L. Saxe
                                       Robert L. Saxe, Chairman and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 15, 2005
    /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A Kruger, Chief Executive Officer Date: August 15, 2005
    /s/ Brian CarterBrian Carter, Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4330 Substitution of trustees.

In jurisdictions in which valid, any deed of trust or mortgage securing a guaranteed or insured loan, if it names trustees, or confers a power of sale otherwise, shall contain a provision empowering any holder of the indebtedness to appoint substitute trustees, or other person with such power to sell, who shall succeed to all the rights, powers and duties of the trustees, or other person, originally designated.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))
# Official Journal C 89/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 89 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6318 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 89

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6318 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 89/01 | Euro exchange rates — 17 March 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 89/01

Euro exchange rates — 17 March 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 89/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9705 — EXOR/GEDI) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 89/03 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 4 |
| 2020/C 89/04 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 18 |
| 2020/C 89/05 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 26 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 89/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9705 — EXOR/GEDI) (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 89/03

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

4

2020/C 89/04

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

18

2020/C 89/05

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

26

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE020 8 9 A 5

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | February 14,  2011                                                                                                                     |   |
|-------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:   | /s/ David W. Brenman David W. BrenmanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(principal executive officer and principal financial officer) |   |
#### § 61.65 Inspections.

VA may inspect the facility and records of any applicant or recipient when necessary to determine compliance with this part or an agreement under § 61.61. The authority to inspect does not authorize VA to manage or control the applicant or recipient.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2011, 2012, 2061, 2064)
Exhibit 10.1
 
 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM
 TO:
    
    Ron Fenech
    
    April 23, 2010CC:
    
    Chris FarmanFROM:
    
    Peter B. OrthweinRE:
    
    MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN FOR RON FENECH BEGINNING 5/1/2010
  1.
    
    Payment of the MIP will be quarterly after the closing of the books.
 The final MIP payment for FY 2010 will be paid within 5 days after receipt of the auditors
report for the year ended July 31, 2010 (approximately September 30, 2010).
 2.
    
    You must be employed at the time of MIP payment.3.
    
    In the unlikely event of losses in any quarter, they will be carried forward to
future quarters. However, they wont be carried forward into the next fiscal year.4.
    
    Your base salary will increase to $1,000,000 per year effective as of February
1, 2010.5.
    
    The maximum you can earn from your MIP in any year is $10,000,000.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Debt Solutions BDC (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:



1. the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 16, 2023

|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Earl Hunt          
|    | Earl Hunt              
|    | Chief Executive Officer







---
J. 

State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district 

court did not err in denying this portion of the motion. 

To the extent that appellant sought to modify his sentence, 

appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was outside the scope 

of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. 

State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the district 

court did not err in denying this portion of the motion. 

Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Juan Fernando Lopez 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 4'1 

2
# Official Journal C 84A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.084.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 84A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5522 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.084.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 84A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5522 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2012/C 084A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competitions | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2012/C 084A/01

Reserve lists — Open competitions

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CERTIFICATIONS BY

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: July 30, 2008

 

/s/ Dean J. Mitchell
§ 21.84 Individualized written rehabilitation plan. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purposes of the IWRP (Individualized Written Rehabilitation Plan) are to: ( 1 ) Identify goals and objectives to be achieved by the veteran during the period of rehabilitation services that will lead to the point of employability;
( 2 ) Plan for placement of the veteran in the occupational field for which training and other services will be provided; and
( 3 ) Specify the key services needed by the veteran to achieve the goals and objectives of the plan. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107)
( b ) *Elements of the plan.* A plan will include the following: ( 1 ) A statement of long-range rehabilitation goals. Each statement of long-range goals shall include at a minimum: ( i ) One vocational goal for a veteran with an employment handicap; or
( ii ) One vocational goal and, if applicable, one independent living goal for a veteran with a serious employment handicap.
( 2 ) Intermediate rehabilitation objectives; Intermediate objectives are statements of achievement expected of the veteran to attain the long-range goal. The development of appropriate intermediate objectives is the cornerstone of an effective plan. Intermediate objectives should have the following characteristics: ( i ) The activity specified relates to the achievement of the goal;
( ii ) The activity specified is definable in terms of observable behavior (e.g., pursuing an A.A. degree);
( iii ) The activity has a projected completion date;
( iv ) The outcome desired upon completion is measurable (e.g., receiving an A.A. degree).
( 3 ) The specific services to be provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs as stated. Counseling shall be included in all plans for a veteran with a serious employment handicap.
( 4 ) The projected starting and completion dates of the planned services and the duration of each service;
( 5 ) Objective criteria and an evaluation procedure and schedule for determining whether the objectives and goals are being achieved as set forth; and
( 6 ) The name, location, and phone number of the VBA case manager.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107(a))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984; 50 FR 9622, Mar. 11, 1985]
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0654n.06

No. 13-3968

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PERCY HUTTON, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. CHARLOTTE JENKINS, Warden Respondent-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

BEFORE: MERRITT, ROGERS, a nd DONALD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This death-penalty case comes back to our court on remand after the Supreme Court’s decision in Jenkins v. Hutton , 137 S. Ct. 1769 (2017). There the Court reversed this panel’s conditional grant of Hutt on’s habeas petition, holding that we improperly applied the fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice excep tion to procedural default when we granted relief on Hutton’s jury -instruction claim. See id. at 1771–73. Because that exception does not apply and because, for the reasons given in our previous opinion, Hutton has not otherwise

shown a valid basis for excusi ng the procedural default, Hutton v. Mitchell , 839 F.3d 486, 500– 01 (2016), the district court properl y denied his jury-instr uction claim as proce durally defaulted. With respect to Hutton’s other claims of error, we reject them for the r easons given in our prior opinion. See id. at 500–05. We therefore affirm the judg ment of the district court denying Hutton’s petition for habeas corpus.Case No. 13-3968, Hutton v. Percy

-2- MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This death-penalty case is now back before us after the Supreme Court reversed our decision to conditionally grant habeas relief unless Hutton received a new sentencing hearing. Jenkins v. Hutton , 137 S. Ct. 1769 (2017), reh’g denied , 2017 WL 3642151 (Aug. 25, 2017). There is no dispute that Hutton’s jury was never instructed on what “aggravating” factors it could consider in deciding between lif e and death for Hutton. The result was a jury with “unfe ttered discretion” to im pose a death sentence in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Gregg v. Georgia , 428 U.S. 153 (1976); see also Furman v. Georgia , 408 U.S. 238 (1972). In its opinion, th e Supreme Court did not rule on, or even mention, the issue raised in my separate concurrence in our 2016 opinion regarding whethe r the issue concerning the lack of a jury instruction on aggravators wa s procedurally defaulted. Because the Supreme Court did not address this issue, I continue to believe, for th e reasons set forth in my 2016 separate opinion, that th e three Ohio Supreme Cour t Justices were correct to reach the conclusion that the lack of a proper jury instruction violated Gregg

. Hutton v. Mitchell , 839 F.3d 486, 505 (6th Cir. 2016) (Merritt, J., conc urring). I continue to adhere to my original position that there was no basis for our holding that the issu e had been procedurally defaulted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

VINCENT J. BRANSON, § § No. 273, 2014 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below — Court of § Chancery of the State of v. § Delaware § DAVID BRANSON, Executor of § ROW No. 260-S the Estate of Dorothea Branson, § § Respondent Below, § Appellee. § Submitted: September 26, 2014 Decided: December 12, 2014

Before HOLLAND , RIDGELY and VALIHURA , Justices.

O R D E R

This 12 th day of December 2014, the Court has considered thi s matter on the briefs of the parties and has concluded that the ju dgment should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its April 30, 2013 bench ruling concluding that the appellant was with out standing to file exceptions in an estate matter and in the Court of Chancery’s letter opinion and order of April 22, 2014, assessing attorney’s fees. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgm ent of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1480

THE HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD G. SHERMAN; TRACY O. HOBSON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MORTGAGE POWER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; JANG HOO JOO; HYUNG SON; JORGE ESTRADA;

JOSE JOVEL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-2498-AW)

Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Hansel H. Rhee, LEE & MCSHANE, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John R. Tjaden, Silver Spring, Maryland; Kevin Karpinski,

ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

The Huntington Mortgage Company appeals from the district

court’s order awarding summary judgment to Richard Sherman and

Tracy Hobson on its claim alleging negligent misrepresentation

under Maryland law. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs,

and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Hobson’s motion to file a surreply brief and

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. The Huntington

Mortgage Co. v. Sherman, No. CA-97-2498-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 31,

1999; entered Sept. 3, 1999; filed Mar. 14, 2000; entered Mar. 15,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED