alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-4191

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL SHAWN TUCKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00179) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Schles, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Monica L. Dillon, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*Although Tucker’s brief states that he received an eightyseven month sentence, the judgment provides a term of eighty-four months’ imprisonment. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Shawn Tucker appeals the eighty-four month sentence he received after pleading guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). Tucker argues that this court improperly affords a presumption of reasonableness to sentences that fall within the properly calculated guidelines range, and that the sentence he received exceeded the term necessary to effectuate the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006). As we conclude that neither claim has merit, we affirm. At sentencing, the parties agreed that the applicable advisory guidelines range was seventy to eight-seven months’ imprisonment. The eighty-four month term of imprisonment imposed by the district court falls within that range. * Moreover, the term is substantially below the twenty-year maximum authorized by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (2000). Accordingly, Tucker’s sentence is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Johnson , 445 F.3d 339, 341 (4th Cir. 2006). Although Tucker challenges the validity and constitutionality of this presumption of reasonableness, the Supreme Court recently upheld our application of the presumption, Rita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007), and Tucker offers no compelling argument to rebut it. Accordingly, Tucker’s- 3 - challenge fails. We further reject Tucker’s conclusory contention that his sentence exceeds that which would be necessary to fulfill the sentencing objectives enumerated in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a). We affirm Tucker’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021009EN.01003402.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/34

---

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DV and Others v Commission

(Case T-576/19) (1)

(2021/C 9/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.                    

*Date:*                         November 19-20, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Johns Hopkins Bayview Campus, Baltimore, MD 21223.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stephen J. Heishman, PhD, Research Psychologist, Clinical                               ( print page 50805)                            Pharmacology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, (410) 550-1547.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 24, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23602 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Official Journal C 115/9 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 115 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 519 May 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 115

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 519 May 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2008/C 115/01 | Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union | 1 |
| Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union | 13 |
| Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union | 47 |
| Protocols | 201 |
| Annexes | 329 |
| Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon | 335 |
| Tables of equivalences | 361 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2008/C 115/01

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

1

Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union

13

Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

47

Protocols

201

Annexes

329

Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon

335

Tables of equivalences

361

---

NOTE TO THE READER

This publication contains the consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, together with the annexes and protocols thereto, as they will result from the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 in Lisbon. It also contains the declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon.

The Treaty of Lisbon is still in the process of being ratified by the Member States, in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. As provided for in Article 6 thereof, the Treaty will enter into force on 1 January 2009, provided that all the instruments of ratification have been deposited, or, failing that, on the first day of the month following the deposit of the last instrument of ratification.

This publication is provisional in nature. Until the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, a number of rectifications may be made to one or other language version of the text, in order to correct possible errors which may come to light in the Treaty of Lisbon or in the prior Treaties.

This text has been produced for documentary purposes and does not involve the responsibility of the institutions of the European Union.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1
       
<S>                                              <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 18110
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          78841 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (22682)
<INVENTORY>                                            10969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      348766
<PP&E>                                                293085
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (276007)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        504944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 326126
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                               42880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                            135938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          504944
<SALES>                                               460844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      464081
<CGS>                                                 108375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         108375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      467676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      3377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (111970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (15700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (96270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (96270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.022)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.022)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.39

 

AGREEMENT ON TERMINATION

 

Party A: Xiaobing Sang

 

Party B: Shanghai Rampage Shopping Co., Ltd.

 

Party C: Rampage Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

 

WHEAERS, all parties have entered into the loan agreement, pledge agreement, purchase option agreement and related documents (Be known as “A Series of Agreements “ hereinafter)

 

Three parties have reached unanimity through friendly consultations, and entered into this Contract to terminate a series of agreements.

 

1.              A Series of Agreements shall be terminated on June 12, 2014 with consents of all of three parties

 

2.              Party B shall bear the taxes payable arising from the transactions contemplated under A Series of Agreements.

 

3.              All of three parties confirm that Party C has received the loan equal to RMB 0.5 million from Party A.

 

4.              All of three parties have no dispute and unfinished matter.

 

5.              This Contract shall have three originals. Each party shall hold one original.

 

	
Party A:
   /s/ Xiaobing Sang
    	
 
    	
Party B:
   /s/ Shanghai Rampage
    	
 
    	
Party C:
   /s/ Rampage Trading
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Shopping Co., Ltd.
    	
 
    	
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
	
Date:
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
 
    	
Date:
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Oman

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Oman			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Oman 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Oman

During the review period, the government made its enacted budget and end-of-year report widely and easily accessible to the general public, including online.  It did not publish an executive budget proposal.  Limited information on debt obligations was publicly available online.  However, the government did not publicly disclose the debts of state-owned enterprises.  Publicly available budget documents lacked sufficient detail and did not include allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises, or allocations to the royal family.  The government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to audit or oversight.  Military and intelligence budgets were not subject to civilian oversight.  The supreme audit institution does not meet international standards of independence, and it did not audit the government’s executed budget.  The process for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts was outlined in law.  While the criteria for making natural resource extraction awards were not generally public, bidders have been informed about the criteria for awards through the bidding process.  Basic information on awards was publicly available. Oman’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- making its executive budget proposal widely and easily accessible to the general public within a reasonable period of time;
- disclosing allocations to, earnings from and debt information of state-owned enterprises;
- publishing expenditures for the royal family;
- subjecting military and intelligence budgets to civilian oversight;
- subjecting off-budget accounts to audit and oversight and making information on such accounts publicly available;
- ensuring supreme audit institution meets international standards, audits the government’s annual executed budget, and makes its reports public; and
- making the criteria for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Oman 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentOman

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# Official Journal L 175/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 175 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5930 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 175

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5930 June 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/1033 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 on market abuse and Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2016/1034 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2016 amending Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (
  1
  ) | 8 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/1033 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 on market abuse and Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories (
  1
  )

1

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2016/1034 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2016 amending Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (
  1
  )

1

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V120

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE I — PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION - Article III-120***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0055 - 0055*

Article III-120

Consumer protection requirements shall be taken into account in defining and implementing other Union policies and activities.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
#### *Jacob Kerr *againd*The President and Directors of the State Bank of New-Brunswick.

MOTION TO CHANGE THE VENUE.

SCOTT, for the defendant, presented an affidavit, which stated that the cause of action, as alleged by the plaintiff, arose from transactions at the bank in *New-Brunswick,*in the county of *Middlesex:*that all the accounts between them were kept in the books of the bank, which were large, numerous, and contained the accounts of all other individuals who had transactions with the bank ; were highly valuable to the bank and to them ; and were every night deposited in the vault for safe keeping: that the witnesses were the officers of the bank, residing in *New-Brunswick,*near to the court-house in *Middlesex ;*and that neither the officers nor the books could be spared to attend court in *Sussex,*without great inconvenience and injury to the defendant, and those who had dealings with them.

Change of VLnue. (a)

(a)

*Abrams vs. Rolfe, ante 30. Hall ads. Cumberland Bk., 2 South, 718. Meldrum vs. Sarvis, Coxe 203. Wildes vs. Mairs, 1 Hal. 320. Dauchy vs. Taylor, 4 Hal. 96. Worley vs. Scudder, 5 Hal. 231. Bell vs. Morris Canal, 3 Gr. 63. Murrray vs. N. J. R. R., 3 Zab. 68. Thorn vs. Central R. R., 2 Dutch. 121. Parker vs. Sussex Bank, 3 Hal. 160. Kerr vs. Whitaker, Pen. *514. Wistar vs. Johnson, Coxe 260. Ward vs. Holmes, 2 Hal. 171. Duyckinck vs. Clinton Ins. Co. 3 Zab. 279. State Bank vs. Hedenburg, 1 Har. 352.*

Upon this affidavit, the court directed the venue to be changed from *Sussex*to *Middlesex.*
(a)  A review of Exeter Finance LLC’s
        activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2020 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Exeter Holdings Trust 2021-1, EFCAR, LLC, Exeter Finance LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the
        “Servicer”), Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and backup servicer, during the year ended December 31, 2022 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the best of my knowledge,
        based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
   By:  /s/ Ben Miller
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### §§ 1.117-1.119 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.