alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13564-000]


 Dexter-Russell, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

September 23, 2009.
    On July 31, 2009, Dexter-Russell, Inc. filed an application, 
pursuant to Section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Dexter-Russell Water Power Project No. 13564, to 
be located on the Quinebaug River, in Worcester County, Massachusetts.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) The existing 11.5-foot-
high, 370-foot-long Russell-Harrington Mill Pond Dam with a 30-foot-
long masonry abutment; (2) an existing 8-acre impoundment with a normal 
water surface elevation of 477.5 feet mean sea level; (3) two new 
siphon turbine generating units with a combined capacity of 500 
kilowatts; (4) a new 790-square-foot forebay and 45-foot-long full-
depth trash rack with automated rake; (5) a new 13.8-kilovolt, 380-
foot-long transmission line; and (6) appurtenant facilities. The 
project would have an estimated annual generation of 1,500 megawatt-
hours.
    Applicant Contact: Robert Ouellette, Dexter-Russell, Inc., 44 River 
Street, Southbridge, MA 01550, (508) 765-0201.
    FERC Contact: Brandon Cherry, (202) 502-8328.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing application: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
    Enter the docket number (P-13564) in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23515 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# COMMUN S OPPT-2006-0621 p. 1 CBIC Control Number 

# 356678 RECEIVED OPPT CaIC 

## 2013 OCT 24 IPM I : 01 Reply To : THOMAS H

. SAMPLES



## EPA P : ;".' 04 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVEMCKET CENTER E.1 . du Pont de Nemours and Company Director, Risk Management 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19898 Scanned &Processed in Telephone

: 302.999.5565 " CIS by: PAULA Email : Thomas.H.Samplest@dunont .com October 31, 2013 PUBLIC COPY- NOCBI OPPT Document Control Office (DCO) Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0621 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW EPA East Building, Room6428 Washington, DC 20004 Dear Sir/Madam

: 2030/15 PFOAStewardship Program Report DuPont is pleased to submit Its annual report documenting our progress In meeting the 2030/15 PFOA Stewardship Programgoals. The report describes accomplishments In 2012 against the major milestones set when the programwas launched in January 2006. For 2012, DuPont has reduced its facility emissions and product content by 99%fromthe base years established for this program . DuPont is also on track to meet the second programgoal to work toward elimination of PFOA and related chemicals by 2015 . Consistent with the DuPont commitment in 2007 to no longer make, buy or use PFOA by 2015, or earlier If possible, DuPont ceased Its manufacture of PFOA In first quarter 2013. DuPont also eliminated use of PFOA in the manufacture of fluoropolymers as of the end of June 2013, two and a half years ahead of the EPA goal . We are on track to complete the conversion to alternatives for the remaining products In 2014. 

# i( Thomas H

. Samples

COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 31, 2013
#### Charles B. Evans, Appellant, v. The American Steel Foundry Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court of New York.

Ashley, Emley & Rubino, for Appellant; Ivins, Kidder & Melcher. for Respondent.

Order affirmed, and judgment absolute for Respondent, under stipulation, with costs. No opinion.
#### § 1070.4 Records of the CFPB not to be otherwise disclosed.

Except as provided by this part, employees or former employees of the CFPB, or others in possession of a record of the CFPB that the CFPB has not already made public, are prohibited from disclosing such records, without authorization, to any person who is not an employee of the CFPB.

[83 FR 46084, Sept. 12, 2018]
§ 1073.203 Omission of procedures. The Bureau shall not be required to follow the procedures described in § 1073.204 where: ( a ) The offset is in the nature of a recoupment;
( b ) The debt arises under a contract as set forth in *Cecile Industries, Inc.* v. *Cheney,* 995 F.2d 1052 (Fed. Cir. 1993); or
( c ) In the case of non-centralized administrative offsets, the Bureau first learns of the existence of the amount owed by the debtor when there is insufficient time before payment would be made to the debtor/payee to allow for prior notice and an opportunity to review. When prior notice and an opportunity to review are omitted, the Director shall give the debtor such notice and an opportunity for review as soon as practicable and shall promptly refund any money ultimately found not to be due to the U.S. Government.
#### § 1014.4 Waiver not permitted.

It is a violation of this part for any person to obtain, or attempt to obtain, a waiver from any consumer of any protection provided by or any right of the consumer under this part.
§ 21.7144 Overpayments. ( a ) *Prevention of overpayments.* In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4008. See § 21.7133. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3690(b))
( b ) *Liability for overpayments.* ( 1 ) The amount of the overpayment of educational assistance paid to a veteran or servicemember constitutes a liability of that veteran or servicemember.
( 2 ) The amount of the overpayment of educational assistance paid to a veteran or servicemember constitutes a liability of the educational institution if VA determines that the overpayment was made as the result of willful or negligent: ( i ) False certification by the educational institution; or
( ii ) Endorsement of a veteran's or servicemember's false certification of his or her actual attendance. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3685)
( c ) *Recovery of overpayments.* In determining whether an overpayment should be recovered from an educational institution, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4009 (except paragraph (a)(1)) to overpayments of educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3685)


Cross Reference:
*Entitlement charges.* See § 21.7076(c).
[62 FR 55761, Oct. 28, 1997. Redesignated at 68 FR 35180, June 12, 2003.]
# Official Journal C 185/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 508 August 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 185

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 508 August 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 185/01 | State aids — Decisions to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty where the Member State concerned has accepted those measures (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 185/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |
| 2007/C 185/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4763 — Cerberus/Torex) (1) | 5 |
| 2007/C 185/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4782 — Delek/Texaco Benelux) (1) | 5 |
| 2007/C 185/05 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4698 — Apollo/CEVA/EGL) (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 185/01

State aids — Decisions to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty where the Member State concerned has accepted those measures (1)

1

2007/C 185/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

2007/C 185/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4763 — Cerberus/Torex) (1)

5

2007/C 185/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4782 — Delek/Texaco Benelux) (1)

5

2007/C 185/05

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4698 — Apollo/CEVA/EGL) (1)

6

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 185/06 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 185/06

Euro exchange rates

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 185/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4781 — Norddeutsche Affinerie/Cumerio) (1) | 8 |
| 2007/C 185/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4837 — Wallenius/Antelo/GAL/CAT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 185/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4781 — Norddeutsche Affinerie/Cumerio) (1)

8

2007/C 185/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4837 — Wallenius/Antelo/GAL/CAT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Bernard ZimmermanName: Bernard Zimmerman
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 3, 2003
42068.

#### NADLER v. OKARMA.

Franiojm, Judge.

The evidence adduced on the trial of this case was not taken down by a court reporter. Counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant were unable to agree upon a brief of the evidence. The trial judge was requested to con*276duct a hearing for the purpose of “settling the brief of evidence,” which request was granted, and at said hearing, the trial judge refused to approve the proposed brief of evidence, and thereupon denied the appellant’s motion for a new trial which was based upon the usual general grounds only. Under these facts, which are conceded by counsel for the appellant in their brief, appellant’s enumeration of errors 1 and 2 are without merit, and since all of the other alleged errors enumerated present no question which can be determined without a consideration of the evidence adduced upon the trial of the case, and there being no certified or approved transcript or brief of such evidence, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. At the time it was overruled the motion for a new trial was ripe for determination, but since there was no proper transcript or brief of the evidence the better practice would have been to dismiss it. Since the legal effect of the judgment denying the motion was the same as a dismissal, such judgment will be affirmed. See *Cain v. State,*131 Ga. 770 (63 SE 289).

Argued June 6, 1966

Decided September 7, 1966.

*Parks & Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg,*for appellant.

*William H. Whaley,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
§ 21.7220 Course approval. ( a ) *Courses must be approved.* ( 1 ) A course of education, including the class schedules of a resident course not leading to a standard college degree, offered by an educational institution must be approved by— ( i ) The State approving agency for the State in which the educational institution is located, or
( ii ) The State approving agency which has appropriate approval authority, or
( iii ) VA, where appropriate. In determining when it is appropriate for VA to approve a course, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4250(b)(3) and (c) of this part.
( 2 ) A course approved under 38 U.S.C. chapter 36 is approved for the purposes of 38 U.S.C. chapter 30 unless it is one of the types of courses listed in § 21.7222 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3672; Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Course approval criteria.* In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, VA and, where appropriate, the State approving agencies, shall apply the following sections. ( 1 ) Section 21.4250 (except paragraph (c)(1))—Jurisdiction for course and licensing and certification test approval and approval notices;
( 2 ) Section 21.4251—Minimum period of operation requirement for educational institutions;
( 3 ) Section 21.4253 (except that portion of paragraph (f)(3) which permits approval of a course leading to a high school diploma)—Accredited courses;
( 4 ) Section 21.4254—Nonaccredited courses;
( 5 ) Section 21.4255—Refund policy—nonaccredited courses;
( 6 ) Section 21.4258—Notice of approval;
( 7 ) Section 21.4259—Suspension or disapproval;
( 8 ) Section 21.4260—Courses in foreign countries;
( 9 ) Section 21.4265—Practical training approved as institutional training or on-job training;
( 10 ) Section 21.4266—Courses offered at subsidiary branches or extensions;
( 11 ) Section 21.4267—Approval of independent study; and
( 12 ) Section 21.4268—Approval of licensing and certification tests. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3476, 3672, 3675, 3676, 3678, 3679, 3680A, 3689)
( c ) *Flight training.* VA and the State approving agencies shall apply the provisions of § 21.4263 when approving flight training under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034)
[53 FR 1757, Jan. 22, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 28392, July 11, 1990; 56 FR 20136, May 2, 1991; 57 FR 15026, Apr. 24, 1992; 61 FR 6790, Feb. 22, 1996; 63 FR 34131, June 23, 1998; 72 FR 16983, Apr. 5, 2007]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2490 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2490

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2008

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a program in 
  the maritime environment for the mobile biometric identification of 
    suspected individuals, including terrorists, to enhance border 
                               security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARITIME BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Within one year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the 
Commandant of the Coast Guard, shall conduct, in the maritime 
environment, a program for the mobile biometric identification of 
suspected individuals, including terrorists, to enhance border security 
and for other purposes.
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary shall ensure the program required 
in this section is coordinated with other biometric identification 
programs within the Department of Homeland Security.
    (c) Cost Analysis.--Within 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Appropriations and Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 
and the Committees on Appropriations and Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate an analysis of the cost of expanding 
the Coast Guard's biometric identification capabilities for use by the 
Coast Guards Deployable Operations Group, cutters, stations, and other 
deployable maritime teams considered appropriate by the Secretary, and 
any other appropriate Department of Homeland Security maritime vessels 
and units. The analysis may include a tiered plan for the deployment of 
this program that gives priority to vessels and units more likely to 
encounter individuals suspected of making illegal border crossings 
through the maritime environment.
    (d) Definition.--For the purposes of this section, the term 
``biometric identification'' means use of fingerprint and digital 
photography images.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge 

Richard F. Cornell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A .fip49
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4503 Amount and amortization. ( a ) The original principal amount of any loan made on or after February 1, 1988, shall not exceed an amount which bears the same ratio to $33,000 as the amount of the guaranty to which the veterans is entitled under 38 U.S.C. 3710 at the time the loan is made bears to $36,000. This limitation shall not preclude the making of advances, otherwise proper, subsequent to the making of the loan pursuant to the provisions of § 36.4511. Except as to home improvement loans, loans made by VA shall near interest at the rate of 71 ⁄ 2 percent per annum. Loans solely for the purposes of energy conservation improvements or other alterations, improvements, or repairs shall bear interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3711(d)(2)(A))
( b ) Each loan shall be repayable on the basis of approximately equal monthly installments; except that in the case of loans made for any of the purposes described in clause (2), (3), or (4) of subsection (a) of 38 U.S.C. 3710, such loans may provide for repayment in quarterly, semiannual, or annual installments, provided that such plan of repayment corresponds to the present and anticipated income of the veteran.
( c ) The first installment payment on a loan to construct, alter or improve a farm residence or other dwelling may be postponed for a period not exceeding 12 months from the date of the loan instruments. The first installment payment for a loan for the purchase of a dwelling or farm on which there is a farm residence may not be postponed more than 60 days from the date of loan closing: *Provided,* That if the loan is repayable in quarterly, semi-annual or annual installments, the first installment payment date may be postponed for not more than 12 months from the date of the loan instruments.
( d ) The final installment on any loan shall not be in excess of two times the average of the preceding installments, except that on a construction loan the final installment may be for an amount not in excess of 5 percent of the original principal amount of the loan. The limitations imposed by this paragraph on the amount of the final installment shall not apply in the case of any loan extended or recast pursuant to § 36.4505 or 36.4506.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 3703(c)(1), 3711(d)(1), 3712 (f) and (g))
[15 FR 6288, Sept. 20, 1950, as amended at 24 FR 2658, Apr. 7, 1959; 52 FR 12382, Apr. 16, 1987; 52 FR 18357, May 15, 1987; 53 FR 18983, May 26, 1988; 53 FR 44401, Nov. 3, 1988; 53 FR 51551, Dec. 22, 1988; 54 FR 24557, June 8, 1989; 54 FR 30384, July 20, 1989; 55 FR 6983, Feb. 28, 1990; 55 FR 40657, Oct. 4, 1990; 57 FR 37713, Aug. 20, 1992]
§ 23.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 23.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 23.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 23.300 through 23.310.