alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

February 24, 2011

Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director

Maryland Department of the Environment

Air and Radiation Management Administration

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21230

Dear Mr. Aburn:

On December 15 , 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department of the

Environment (MDE). The SIP revision pertains to the adoption of EPA’s Control Technique

Guidelines (CTG) for large appliance coating and includes amendments to Regulation . 06 under

COMAR 26.11.19

– Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. EPA has

determined that the submittal is administrat ively and technically complete and is reviewing it to

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat,

at (215) 814

- 2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Dia ne Franks , MDE
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28






[TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. Letterhead]


         This letter is written to express the understanding between
TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") and Annapolis Partners, LLC
("Partners"). Partners is a joint venture between Mesirow Stein Real Estate and
Maurice B. Tose, President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of the Company.

         Currently the Company's headquarters is located at 275 West Street,
Annapolis, Maryland. The Company has experienced considerable growth and is
interested in consolidating its headquarters. The Company is currently in the
process of identifying appropriate office space in the Annapolis area,
specifically with a goal of centralizing its offices and using its location as a
recruiting tool to attract and retain talented employees. The Company has
experienced difficulty locating an appropriate property due to the lack of prime
commercial waterfront office space in the Annapolis area.

         Partners has been selected by Anne Arundel County to redevelop a
42-acre waterfront property in Annapolis, Maryland formerly operated by the U.S.
Navy as the David Taylor Research Center (the "David Taylor Property"). Partners
expects the redevelopment to occur in stages and expects to take control of the
David Taylor Property from Anne Arundel County in late 2000. Construction is
currently expected to begin in January 2001.

         The Company has approached Partners and is currently in preliminary
negotiations with Partners to become a tenant at the David Taylor Property. The
Company expects to contract with appropriate parties to develop plans for its
headquarters at the David Taylor Property. The Company anticipates spending
approximately $200,000 to develop these plans and will consult with Partners as
part of that process. The parties have agreed that should the Company enter into
a lease for office space at the David Taylor Property, Partners will reimburse
the Company for all the fees and expenses paid by the Company in connection with
the design and plans for its headquarters at the David Taylor Property either in
the form of a reduction of rent in the future or an outright payment of the full
amount. The design and plans for the Company's headquarters at the David Taylor
Property are expected to be the sole property of the Company until Partners
reimburses the Company in full for such fees and expenses.

         This letter merely evidences preliminary negotiations between the
parties and is subject to further modifications and shall not be construed,
under any circumstances, to evidence any binding commitment on the part of the
Company or Partners to enter into any definitive lease agreement for office
space. Such modifications shall be in writing and shall be agreed to by both
parties.




Annapolis Partners, LLC                 TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.


By: /s/ Maurice B. Tose                 By: /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
    --------------------------              ---------------------------
        Maurice B. Tose                         Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3

4 2 5 6 7 7 - 8! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 !

4 2 5 6 7 9 : ;! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 "

4 2 5 6 7 < 9 =! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 #

4 2 5 6 > 7 ?

=! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 $

4 2 5 6 & $ !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 %

4 2 5 6 & @ A

;! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 &

4 2 5 6 & & - 7! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 '

4 2 5 6 B 7 9 4! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 (

4 2 5 6 B - > C! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 )

4 2 5 6 D = 9 8! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3

4 2 5 6 E ? = F! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 !

4 2 5 6 < - G F! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 "

4 2 5 6 F 7 ?

:! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 #

4 2 5 6 F 7 - H! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 ' 3

, 3 ! 3 $

4 2 5 6 F < 9 @
§ 45.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Rwanda

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Rwanda			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Rwanda 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Rwanda

During the review period, the government’s executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report were widely and easily accessible online to the general public within a reasonable period of time.  Information on public debt obligations and publicly guaranteed debt figures were publicly available, however detailed information on specific state-owned enterprise debt guaranteed by the government was unavailable.  Allocations to and earnings from some significant state-owned enterprises were available in budget documents.  The government made available detailed information for some state-owned enterprises but did not make detailed information regarding all transfers easily accessible to the public.  The supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence.  It reviewed the government’s accounts and made its reports publicly available.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were outlined in law and appeared to be followed in practice. Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was public.  The sovereign wealth fund disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals. Rwanda’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- making detailed information on state-owned enterprise debt publicly available; and
- making detailed information on allocations to and earnings from all significant state-owned enterprises publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Rwanda 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentRwanda

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (695)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             245
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                         450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,456
<SALES>                                            100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       35
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (9)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (9)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of IR BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael K. Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


     /s/ Michael K. Wilhelm
     ----------------------
     Chief Executive Officer
     November 13, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
42281.

#### STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH.

Pannbll, Judge.

Where a demurrer to one of the prayers of a petition is sustained and the prayer is ordered deleted from the petition and the petition redrawn, such an order is not a final judgment or such other ruling, judgment, or order as *732will support an appeal under the provisions of Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965. Ga. L. 1965, p. 18 *{Code Ann.*§ 6-701). The appeal, in the present case, from such an order must therefore be dismissed.

Argued September 9, 1966

Decided December 2, 1966.

*L. B. Kent,*for appellant.

*Hatcher, Stubbs, Land ■& Rothschild, J. Rudolph Jones, A. J. Land, Albert W. Stubbs,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
# Official Journal L 15/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.015.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5518 January 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.015.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 15

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5518 January 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 34/2012 of 17 January 2012 amending for the 163rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 35/2012 of 17 January 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 20 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 34/2012 of 17 January 2012 amending for the 163rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 35/2012 of 17 January 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

20

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis 

INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL, 

 INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, INC. AND 

 PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2233-10-4 PER CURIAM 

MARCH 8, 2011 

NEZHA ALAOUI 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Joshua M. Wulf; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., 

on brief), for appellants. 

 (Jin Kim; Chasen Boscolo, on brief), for appellee. 

 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Inova Health System Foundation, Inc. and PMA Management 

Corporation (collectively “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission. Employer asserts the commission erred in (1) finding claimant proved her 

disability, and specifically, the recurrence of post-traumatic headaches, was causally related to 

her February 12, 2008 workplace injury; (2) finding any disability and medical treatment since 

August 31, 2009, was causally related to claimant’s workplace injury; (3) relying on Dr. Rajesh 

K. Sethi’s medical opinions, diagnosis, and treatment to conclude claimant’s disability and 

medical treatment after August 31, 2009, were causally related to her workplace injury rather 

than relying on the medical opinion of Dr. John W. Cochran, who reached the opposite 

conclusion; (4) relying on Dr. Sethi’s medical conclusions when his reports failed to explain the 

recurrence of symptoms after an eight-month lapse in treatment for any symptoms; (5) failing to 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

deny the claim based on inconsistencies in claimant’s testimony that suggested other possible 

causes of her headaches and the duration of symptoms; and (6) failing to deny the claim where 

all of claimant’s objective tests have been normal and the finding of disability was based solely 

on claimant’s subjective complaints. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s 

opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the commission in its final opinion. See Alaoui v. Inova Fairfax Hosp., VWC File No. 

237-49-81 (Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2546 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2546

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
    Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Charles George Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CHARLES GEORGE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
MEDICAL CENTER.
    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
located at 1100 Tunnel Road, Asheville, North Carolina, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Charles George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Charles George Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Center.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                      1,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,109
<PP&E>                                          13,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,065
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,122)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,275
<SALES>                                          4,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,393
<CGS>                                            2,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (114)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                799,767
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                         201,781    
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                                13,424,478    <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,169,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        11,872,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 217,343
<BONDS>                               8,902,152    <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              2,752,925    <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          11,872,420
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      579,557    <F4>
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         293,717    <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    218,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          67,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Bouyer *v.*City of Enterprise.

*Violating Municipal Ordinance.*

(Decided May 30, 1912.

59 South. 188.)

*Intoxicating Liquors; City Ordinance; Variance.*— Where the accused was charged with violating a city ordinance which prohibited the giving away or exchanging intoxicating iiquors, among other acts, and the ordinance introduced in evidence contained no such provision, there was a variance fatal to a conviction.

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

George Bouyer urns convicted of violating a prohibition ordinance of the city of Enterprise, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

H. L. Martin for appellant.

No brief reached the Reporter.

No counsel marked for appellee.

PELHAM, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the mayor’s court of the city of Enterprise, and ap*293pealed to the circuit court. The complaint alleged the violation of an ordinance of the city of Enterprise against selling, giving away, or exchanging spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors. The ordinance introduced on the trial did not correspond with the averments of the complaint. The complaint was for the violation of an ordinance prohibiting, among other acts, giving away or exchanging, and the ordinance introduced contained no such prohibition. The question was properly raised when the ordinance was offered in evidence, and on the authority of *Bouyer v. City of Enterprise, infra,*58 South. 755, this case must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.