alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08196**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 08196\08196_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 08196\08196_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 08196\08196_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 08196\08196_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08196\08196_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08196\08196_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08196\08196_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 08196\Supporting Documentation\08196_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 08196\Supporting Documentation\08196_Aerial Map_2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08196\Supporting Documentation\08196_Water Blance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q OF
RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,606,547
<SECURITIES>                                 3,292,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,273,621
<PP&E>                                         318,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,614,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,215,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,134,571
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,614,357
<SALES>                                        198,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               615,721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,474,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,859,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,859,143)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.49)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 499/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 499 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6410 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 499

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6410 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 499/01 | Position (EU) No 37/2021 of the Council at First Reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1999/62/EC, 1999/37/EC and (EU) 2019/520, as regards the charging of vehicles for the use of certain infrastructuresAdopted by the Council on 9 November 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 499/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 37/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1999/62/EC, 1999/37/EC and (EU) 2019/520, as regards the charging of vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures | 42 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 499/01

Position (EU) No 37/2021 of the Council at First Reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1999/62/EC, 1999/37/EC and (EU) 2019/520, as regards the charging of vehicles for the use of certain infrastructuresAdopted by the Council on 9 November 2021

1

2021/C 499/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 37/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1999/62/EC, 1999/37/EC and (EU) 2019/520, as regards the charging of vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures

42

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2006143EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/1

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the Court of Justice

(2006/C 143/01)

Following his appointment as Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Communities of 6 April 2006 (1), Mr Paolo Mengozzi took the oath before the Court on 3 May 2006.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 104 of 13 April 2006, p. 36

1

---
§ 21.7610 Selection of a program of education. ( a ) *General requirement.* An individual must be pursuing an approved program of education in order to receive educational assistance. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16131; Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Approval of a program of education.* VA will approve a program of education selected by a reservist for payment of educational assistance under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 if— ( 1 ) The program accords with the definition of a program of education found in § 21.7520(b)(17) of this part,
( 2 ) It has an educational, professional or vocational objective (as defined in § 21.7520(b)(7) and (28) of this part), and
( 3 ) The courses and subjects in the program are approved for VA purposes as provided in § 21.7720 of this part.
( 4 ) The reservist is not already qualified for the objective of the program.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 1671; Pub. L. 98-525)
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996]
§ 14.706 Legal services in behalf of beneficiaries. ( a ) The Regional Counsel may furnish legal services in behalf of minor and incompetent beneficiaries of the Department of Veterans Affairs in fiduciary appointment and estate administration matters involving Department of Veterans Affairs benefits or property derived therefrom when the beneficiary's estate or income is not sufficient to justify the employment of an attorney.
( b ) The Regional Counsel may also furnish legal services in hardship situations when restoration from legal disability is a condition of precedent to direct payment of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.
( c ) Where the fiduciary does not in due course institute the necessary action to terminate the trust relationship and the beneficiary requests representation by the Regional Counsel or in any such case where there is in question the proper administration of the estate, the Regional Counsel may file the necessary action and supply legal services. Costs, unless assessed against the fiduciary, should be charged to the estate of the beneficiary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,264,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,600,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,992,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,975,000
<PP&E>                                       8,944,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,549,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,466,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,113,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       466,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,154,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,466,000
<SALES>                                     12,117,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,117,000
<CGS>                                       10,009,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,009,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (51,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,008,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,008,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE *v.*BRANNEN.

1. Appeal and Error — Bastardy Proceedings — Criminal Law —Judgment.

A writ of error does not lie in any case before judgment, and will not issue to review bastardy proceedings after conviction and before judgment or sentenoe.

2. Same — Certiorari.

No judgment known to tbe common law is rendered in such cases; the proceedings are purely statutory, the judgment being final and reviewable only by writ of certiorari.

Error to Oakland; Smith, J.

Submitted November 14, 1912.

(Docket No. 136.)

Decided December 17, 1912.

Hugh J. Brannen was convicted of being the father of an illegitimate child.

Dismissed.

*Andrew L. Moore,*for appellant.

*Carl H. Pelton,*Prosecuting Attorney, and *Clinton McGee,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Pee Cubiam.

In bastardy proceedings respondent was convicted by a jury. A motion for a new trial was denied. No judgment has been entered. Respondent assigned errors and settled a bill of exceptions, which is brought into this court by writ of error.

A writ of error lies in any case only to review a judgment. Aside from this, the practice in such cases has been misconceived. We are aware that in one, and, perhaps, in more than one, case the proceeding appears to have been reviewed upon writ of error; no notice being taken of the use of the writ. See *Hull*v. *People,*41 Mich. 167 (2 N. W. 175). The proceeding is, however, purely statutory, not after the course of the common law, and is summary. No judgment known to the common *412law follows the verdict, and the judgment rendered is final. 2 Comp. Laws, §§ 5904, 5905 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] §§ 4989, 4990). The only remedy available to an aggrieved party is by writ of certiorari. *Cross*v. People, 8 Mich. 113.

The writ must be dismissed.
§ 78.60 Suicide prevention services: Clinical services for emergency treatment. ( a ) Grantees providing or coordinating the provision of clinical services for emergency treatment must provide or coordinate the provision of clinical services for emergency treatment of a participant.
( b ) If an eligible individual is furnished clinical services for emergency treatment under paragraph (a) of this section and the grantee determines that the eligible individual requires ongoing services, the grantee must refer the eligible individual to VA for additional care. If the eligible individual refuses the grantee's referral to VA, any ongoing clinical services provided to the eligible individual by the grantee are at the expense of the grantee. The grantee may not charge, bill, or otherwise hold liable eligible individuals for the receipt of such care or services.
( c ) If a participant other than an eligible individual is furnished clinical services for emergency treatment under paragraph (a) of this section and the grantee determines that the participant requires ongoing services, the grantee must refer the participant to appropriate health care services in the area for additional care. Except as provided for under paragraph (a) of this section, funds provided under this grant program may not be used to provide ongoing clinical services to such participants, and any ongoing clinical services provided to the participant by the grantee are at the expense of the grantee. The grantee may not charge, bill, or otherwise hold liable such participants for the receipt of such care or services.
( d ) For purposes of this section, emergency treatment means medical services, professional services, ambulance services, ancillary care and medication (including a short course of medication related to and necessary for the treatment of the emergency condition that is provided directly to or prescribed for the patient for use after the emergency condition is stabilized and the patient is discharged) was rendered in a medical emergency of such nature that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected that delay in seeking immediate medical attention would have been hazardous to life or health. This standard is met by an emergency medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) that a prudent layperson who possesses an average knowledge of health and medicine could reasonably expect the absence of immediate medical attention to result in placing the health of the individual in serious jeopardy, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part.
( e ) The direct provision of clinical services for emergency treatment by grantees under this section is not prohibited by § 78.80(a).
[87 FR 13835, Mar. 10, 2022; 87 FR 16101, Mar. 22, 2022]
### Fw: Our response to your first set of comments Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 03:53 PM 

### Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664 Mailcode: C404-05
----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 03:53 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Laity, James A." <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov>, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lea Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/12/2011 02:11 PM Subject: Our response to your first set of comments 

### Jim, and Dom, Attached is our response to your comments on page one of the notice in the first set of comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you are in agreement with these edits. Thanks. Lydia
# C_2009026EN.01S00301.xml

| 3.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radva Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:             November 11, 2004
                                                /s/ Luther I. Dickens
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Luther I. Dickens
                                                Chief Executive Officer



Date:             November 11, 2004
                                                /s/ William F. Fry
                                                ------------------------------
                                                William F. Fry
                                                Vice President-
                                                Chief Financial Officer
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK, GENERAL TERM,

APRIL, 1900.

#### Elizabeth Hines, Respondent, *v.*The John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Langbein Bros. & Langbein (Leonard J. Langbein, of counsel), . for appellant. ■ • .

William J. O’Leary (J. Delahunty, of counsel), for respondent.

Hascall, J.

A careful reading and consideration of the case on appeal convince us that it was error for the court to direct a verdict for plaintiff. - Even if the evidence, when plaintiff rested, *810were convincing, and the court determined that a *prima facie*case had been made out, still, considering that the defense was fraud, the permission to defendant to proceed with its side of the proofs at the trial certainly brought up an issue of fact that the defendant was entitled to have passed upon by the jury.

If we are right in stating that the question of fraud or fraudulent intent is always one of fact, then error was committed below in not permitting the jury to pass upon that question in this case. The direction of a verdict goes for the plaintiff when he has made out his case, under the rules governing the trial, upon all the evidence; or defendant has, beyond a reasonable doubt, succeeded upon all the evidence in establishing its defense. Where there is that reasonable doubt which brings in question plaintiff’s necessary preponderance of evidence the situation is no longer upon a question of law for the court,, but becomes one of fact for the jury — a positive right in favor of the party that the trial justice may not take from them.

We think the papers show a clear right to the defendant to have its defense passed upon by the jury, and that verdict should have been undirected by the court.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.
SUPREME COURT, ONONDAGA SPECIAL TERM,

MAY, 1900.

#### Charles N. Bliss et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*The Village of Baldwinsville, Defendant.

Action to foreclose mechanic’s liens.

C. P. Ryan, J. O. Meldram and E. H. Wilson, for plaintiffs.

J. W. Shea, for defendant.

Hiscock, J.

Judgment is ordered for defendant upon the ground that Baldwin and Ostrander completed the building contracted to be built for defendant by Jennie Van Dusen, under an arrangement with said defendant to so complete it for the moneys unpaid on said contract when abandoned by said Van Dusen, and save themselves from liability as her bondsmen; that defendant had the right under such arrangement to pay to said Baldwin and Ostrander the amount not earned under said contract when abandoned as aforesaid and which moneys plaintiffs seek to reach in this action. McChesney v. City of Syracuse, 75 Hun, 503.

Judgment for defendant.