alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1011.50 Advertising disclaimers; subdivisions registered and effective with the Bureau. ( a ) The following disclaimer statement shall be displayed below the text of all printed material and literature used in connection with the sale or lease of lots in a subdivision for which an effective Statement or Record is on file with the Director: “Obtain the Property Report required by Federal law and read it before signing anything. No Federal agency has judged the merits or value, if any, of this property.” If the material or literature consists of more than one page, it shall appear at the bottom of the front page. The disclaimer statement shall be set in type of at least ten point font.
( b ) If the advertising is of a classified type; is not more than five inches long and not more than one column in print wide, the disclaimer statement may be set in type of at least six point font.
( c ) This disclaimer statement need not appear on billboards, on normal size matchbook folders or business cards which are used in advertising nor in advertising of a classified type which is less than one column in print wide and is less than five inches long.
( d ) A developer who is required by any state, or states, to display an advertising disclaimer in the same location, or one of equal prominence, as that of the Federal disclaimer, may combine the wording of the disclaimers. All of the wording of the Federal disclaimer must be included in the resulting combined disclaimer.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                                    ------------

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                          KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
                      STOCK OPTION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS-DISTRIBUTION

     This Amendment to Kent Electronics Corporation Stock Option Plan and
Agreement for Executive Vice President of Operations-Distribution (the "Plan"),
is effective as of the 2nd day of July, 1997 (the "Effective Date"), between
Kent Electronics Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company"), and Mark A.
Zerbe (the "Optionee").

     WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Plan effective May 8, 1995; and

     WHEREAS, on July 2, 1997, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved certain amendments to the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises herein, this
Amendment to the Plan further evidences the amendment of the Plan as follows:

     1.   Amendment to the Plan.  The Plan is hereby amended as set forth on
          Exhibit A attached hereto.

     2.   Full Force and Effect.  The Plan, as amended hereby, shall remain in
          full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                              KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION


                              By: /s/ Morrie K. Abramson
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Morrie K. Abramson
                                  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                    Officer and President


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE:

Optionee:

/s/ Mark A. Zerbe
----------------------------------------
Mark A. Zerbe
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT A

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                          KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
                      STOCK OPTION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS-DISTRIBUTION

     Section 5 of the Kent Electronics Corporation Stock Option Plan and
Agreement for Executive Vice President of Operations-Distribution shall be
amended in its entirety to provide for transferability of stock options as
follows:

     5.  Transferability of Option. Except as set forth below, the Option
     granted hereunder shall not be transferable by the Optionee otherwise than
     by will or operation of the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to
     a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of
     the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the
     rules thereunder; provided, however, that the Option may be transferable,
     without payment of consideration, to immediate family members of the
     Optionee or to trusts or partnerships for such family members.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1106** 

WALTER J. SLOCUM , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United State s District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3:08

- cv - 03714

- CMC )

Submitted : October 25, 2011 Decided: November 15, 2011

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senio r Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part ; dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion
. Cornelius J. Sullivan, SULLIVAN & WALSH, Mattapan, Massachusetts, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Christie V. Newman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; David C. Belt, Acting Chief Counsel, Michael J. Elston, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Walter J. Sloc um appeals the district court ’ s order finding in favor of Defen dant o n Slocum’s age discrimination claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slocum v. Donahoe , N o. 3:08

- cv - 03714

- CMC (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2011)
. Slocum also seeks to appeal the district court’s previous order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Slocum’s disability discrimination claim. However, because Slocum limited the scope of his noti ce of appeal to only the district court’s order on Slocum’s age discrimination claim, his appeal of the district court’s previous order on the disability discrimination claim is not properly before this court and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. , 487 U.S. 312, 317 (1988) (requirement s of Fed. R. App. P. 3 are jurisdictional). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ar gument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4331 Capacity of parties to contract.

Nothing in §§ 36.4300 through 36.4380 shall be construed to relieve any lender of responsibility otherwise existing, for any loss caused by the lack of legal capacity of any person to contract, convey, or encumber, or caused by the existence of other legal disability or defects invalidating, or rendering unenforceable in whole or in part, either the loan obligation or the security therefor.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))

[73 FR 6310, Feb. 1, 2008. Redesignated at 75 FR 33705, June 15, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 34319, June 16, 2015]
#### Henry Corn, Respondent, *v.*Emil Mesnier, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan.

*774Abraham Levy, for appellant. *

Lachman & Goldsmith, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

There was enough evidence to warrant a finding of the relationship of landlord and tenant, for rent had been paid to the petitioner up to December first.

The petition was sufficient to require the justice to issue the precept.

The appeal is without merit. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Teuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 18, 2023 

# S

In the 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00798-CV IN RE CARLOS ENRIQUE LORDUY, Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-23-08291 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court is relator’s A ugust 15, 2023 “Motion for Preliminary Injunction,” which we construe as a petition for writ of inj unction. Relator asks this Court to (1) “grant a preliminary injunc tion ordering the immediate return of [a] child to” relator’s custody pending the resolution of the unde rlying case and (2) “investigate the circumstances surrounding the denial of visitation and to ensure the child’s safety and well-being moving forward.” A petition for a writ of injunction filed in an appellate court must comply with the requirements of rule 52. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a) (“Each court of appeals . . . may issue . . . all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the–2– court.”); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.1 (“An original proceed ing seeking extraordinary relief—such as [an] . . . injunction . . . —is commenced by filing a petition with the clerk of the appropriate appellate court.”). Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.1, 52.3(a)–(h), (j)–(k), 52.7(a). For instance, relator’s petition is not certified. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler , 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.—Dal las 2008, orig. proceeding). The petition is also not supported by an appendix or record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1); Butler , 270 S.W.3d at 759. Relator bears the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient re cord to show he is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Without a certified petition and appendix or record, rela tor has not carried his burden. See Butler , 270 S.W.3d at 758–59. Additionally, to the extent relator s eeks injunctive relie f, this Court has authority to “issue a writ of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.” T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a). Relator has an appeal pending in this Court in Case No. 05-23 -00625-CV. But relator’s requested injunctive relief is not necessary to enfor ce this Court’s jurisdiction in relator’s pending appeal, and relator otherwise assert s no appropriate reason for us to enter injunctive relief.–3– To the extent relator asks this Court to conduct an investigation, our original jurisdiction does not include jurisdic tion to conduct such investigations. See T EX
. C ONST . art. V, § 6; T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction.

230798F.P05 /Cor y L. Carl y le / CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Maldives

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Maldives			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives

During the review period, the government made significant progress by making information on contingent debt, including state-owned enterprise debt, publicly available.  During the review period, the government made budget documents widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  The government did not produce an end-of-year report, but end-of-year data for 2020 were included in the proposed 2021 budget and fiscal data was published in weekly, monthly, and semi-annual updates.  Budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, and budget documents were considered generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution was mandated to review the government’s consolidated annual financial statements, but its audit reports were not publicly available.   Maldives’ fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing an end-of-year report within a reasonable period of time; and
- publishing audit reports within a reasonable period of time.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Maldives 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentMaldives

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 10(10)

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                          LINCOLN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
                EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST AGREEMENT
                       (AS ADOPTED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998)

         Pursuant to rights  reserved  under Section 9.1 of the Lincoln  Federal
Savings Bank Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan and Trust  Agreement (the "Plan"),
Lincoln  Federal  Savings  Bank (the  "Bank")  amends  Section 1.12 of the Plan,
effective January 1, 2000, to provide, in its entirety, as follows:

         Section 1.12.  Compensation  " shall mean the total of all amounts paid
or  payable  in cash by the  Companies  by reason of  services  performed  by an
Employee during any period, including bonuses, overtime, any other cash payments
included on an Employee's W-2,  amounts  deferred by the Employee under any cash
or deferred arrangement maintained by a Company under Section 401(k) of the Code
and any salary reductions elected by the Employee pursuant to a salary reduction
plan  maintained by a Company under Section 125 of the Code but excluding,  with
respect to any Employee,  any other amounts  contributed  by a Company for or on
account of that  Employee  under this Plan or under any other  employee  benefit
plan;  provided,  however,  that for  purposes  of  determining  the  Plan  Year
Compensation of a Participant who receives all or a part of his  Compensation in
commissions  and for purposes of Section 4.2, the commissions in excess of fifty
thousand  dollars  ($50,000)  shall  be  disregarded;  provided,  further,  that
Compensation  in a Plan  Year  in  excess  of one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand
($150,000),  as adjusted  pursuant to Section  401(a)(17) of the Code,  shall be
disregarded.

         This  Second  Amendment  to the  Plan  has  been  executed  this day of
16 day of May, 2000.

                                                  LINCOLN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK


                                                 By: /s/ T. Tim Unger
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     T. Tim Unger
                                                 Its: President/CEO
Attest:

By: /s/ John M. Baer
    ------------------------------
    John M. Baer
Its: Secretary/Treasurer
# C_2006014EN.01000301.xml

| 19.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4019 — Fraport/Deutsche Bank/Budapest Airport)

(2006/C 14/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4019. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4019. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 78.55 Suicide prevention services: Education.

Grantees providing or coordinating the provision of education must provide or coordinate the provision of suicide prevention education programs to educate communities, veterans, and families on how to identify those at risk of suicide, how and when to make referrals for care, and the types of suicide prevention resources available within the area. Education can include gatekeeper training, lethal means safety training, or specific educations programs that assist with identification, assessment, or prevention of suicide.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2605 

To establish a sunset for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. JONES of North 

Carolina, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, 

Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. ELLISON, and Mrs. 

BOYDA of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To establish a sunset for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 

107–243). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sunset of Public Law 

5 107–243 Act of 2007’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2605 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUNSET OF PUBLIC LAW 107–243. 

2 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

3 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243) is amend4 ed by adding at the end the following new section: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 5. SUNSET. 

6 ‘‘This joint resolution shall cease to be effective be7 ginning 180 days after the date of the enactment of the 

8 Sunset of Public Law 107–243 Act of 2007.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

10 Nothing in the amendment made by section 2 of this 

11 Act shall be construed to prevent or prohibit Congress in 

12 the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act from— 

14 (1) reauthorizing Public Law 107–243, with or 

15 without amendment, as appropriate; and 

16 (2) passing a new authorization for the use of 

17 military force against Iraq or a declaration of war 

18 against Iraq, as appropriate. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the Quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by The First Connecticut
Capital Corporation (the "Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.


------------------------------                  -------------------------------
Laurence R. Yurdin                              Priscilla E. Ottowell
President and Chief Executive Officer           Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             381
<SECURITIES>                                      7781
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1062
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (10)
<INVENTORY>                                       2833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12606
<PP&E>                                            8522
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        102392
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13664
<SALES>                                           2561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2767
<CGS>                                             1486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (243)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>