alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: JANUARY 22, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

.. , ·- ; c ~ J -. ·. 

: __ , """", 

PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SKYDIVING CENTER 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-1116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case Nos. 2014WP130012 and 

2014WP130023) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All 

future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the 

Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

·. ..--- i 

- i, i! 

,,:'--; 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 

8900 SW 1 07th A venue, Suite 203 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-598-4841 

FAX: 305-598-4842 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
§ 80.10 Grant agreement. ( a ) VA will draft a VSTAGP grant agreement to be executed by VA and the grantee.
( b ) The VSTAGP grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees to, and will ensure that each subgrantee (if applicable) agrees to: ( 1 ) Operate the project in accordance with this part and the terms of the agreement.
( 2 ) Abide by the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards under 2 CFR parts 25, 170, and 200 if applicable.
( 3 ) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports for project monitoring and evaluation purposes, as VA may establish for purposes of carrying out the VSTAGP effectively and efficiently and as described in the NOFO; and
( 4 ) Provide any necessary additional information requested by VA in the manner and timeframe specified by VA.
(Authority: Pub. L. 116-315, sec. 4304; 2 CFR 200.203)
#### § 21.7070 Entitlement.

An eligible servicemember or veteran is entitled to a monthly benefit for periods of time during which he or she is enrolled in, and satisfactorily pursuing, an approved program of education.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3014; Pub. L. 98-525)
SERVED: June 24, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2014 JUN ')5 . OFFICE OF HEARINGS . 4 1-\ c;: 31 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

LEARJET INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-01 J3 

·(Civil Penalty Action). 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

The parties have agreed to an extension of discovery deadlines. Accordingly, paragraphs 

#2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and. are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

1. On or before September 26, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, dociunent production, responses 

to production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve 

a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a.timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after 

September 26, 2014, subJect to the availability of courtroom facilities. 

The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a 

separate Order. · 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST -.BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2 W 1 000 1 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Ralph Acs, Vice President & General Manager 

Learjet, Inc., Respondent 

P.O. Box 7707 

Wichita, KS 67277-7707 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: · NOT PROVIDED 

Brenda R. Mesker, 

Director of Legal Services 

Learjet, Inc. 

One Learjet Way 

Wichita, KS 67209 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Kenneth P. Quinn, Esquire, Respondent 's Counsel 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman 

2300 N Street, NW 

Washington, DC 2003 7-1122 

TEL: 202-663-8000 

FAX: 202-663-8007 

David Kessler, Complainant's Co·unsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641. 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0113 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited ~ourier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

2 
----------------........... 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAC(: 202-366-7536 

3
WILL-POWERS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1890.]

Swing, Cox and Smith, TT.

#### * SOPHIA JENNERT, TRUSTEE, v. ELIZA HOUSER ET AL.

Power to Dispose of Property to Heirs.

The provisions of a will devising realty to a devisee, he to divide the fee-simple among the Ijeirs of his body, by deed or will, as to him shall deem best, do not empower such devisee to will the property to one of his heirs to hold for three years and then distribute among certain parties, named in proportions as stated in the will.

On Appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

The question decided in this case arose on a demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of three of the heirs, claiming that the provisions, of the will of Frederick Arleth were not a proper execution of the powers conferred upon him by the will of his wife. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

Kramer & Kramer, and Lowry Jackson, for plaintiff in error.

Jordan.& Jordans, and J. W. O’Hara, for defendants in.error.

*

 This case was dismissed by the supreme court for want of preparation, March 12, 1895. 2 Ohio Legal News, 337.

Swing, J.

The question involved in this case is whether Frederick Arleth, by bis will, made such a disposition of the -property left him by the will of his wife Louise Arleth, as by said will he was authorized to do.

Louise Arleth, by her will, says, “And as-to the fee simple or absolute title thereof, it is my will, and I do direct andTequire him (Frederick Arleth) by deed or -will to convey, give or demise the same to and among the’ heirs of his body, * * * in such.parts and proportions, and by such title as he may deem best.”

By the fourth item of the will Frederick Arleth gave to his daughter-Eliza Arleth, her successors, heirs and assigns, the balance of the estate left him by his wife, in trust, to hold for five years after his death, with power to rent, lease, repair and dispose of in any manner, and for any price and upon any terms, without bond, as she or her successor might see fit, and at the expiration of said term of years to divide and distribute among certain designated persons, in certain sums as he has pointed out.

In doing this, we think he did not act in accordance with the power given him under the will of Louise Arleth. He was.required by deed or will to dispose of the fee simple or absolute title among certain persons. This he has not done. The fee simple, or absolute title, he has given to a trustee, with power by deed to dispose of the property, and the proceeds she is to dispose of as he directs; in other words, he has clearly delegated to another, to do that which he only was authorized to do. This he could not do, and what he has attempted to do by item four of h’is will is, we think void.

The petition of the plaintiff asks for an order of the court to sell the real estate that passed by said item four. This the court can not grant, and the same will therefore be dismissed.

This decision in no wise conflicts with the former decision of this court, wherein this court held that it had no power, in a suit in equity brought for that purpose, to declare this will void, the parties not being in possession.
#### § 53.40 Submissions of information and documents.

All submissions of information and documents required to be presented to VA must be made to the Director, Geriatrics and Extended Care Operations, VHA Headquarters, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection provisions in this section under control number 2900-0709)

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1744)

[73 FR 73560, Dec. 3, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 73313, Dec. 10, 2012]
#### Peter J. McCourt, Respondent, *v.*Cynthia B. Cowperthwait, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to preclude plaintiff from giving evidence at the trial of the above-entitled action in support of the allegations in the amended complaint, wherein plaintiff claims to have expended certain sums for the benefit of the defendant.

Dill, Seymour & Baldwin (Henry Schoenherr, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Walter Cox, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

The defendant having accepted the further bill of particulars served pursuant to the order of May 8, 1899, and having retained the same for five months without objection, we are of opinion that the defendant was guilty of *laches*in applying for an order to preclude the plaintiff from giving evidence at the trial.

The retention of the bill of particulars by the defendant was an admission on her part that the plaintiff had complied with the order requiring the service of a further bill of particulars, and we believe the bill of particulars so served contained all the information that it was possible for the plaintiff to furnish.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars’ costs and disbursements.

Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and Conlan, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
# Official Journal C 141/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 141 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6123 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 141

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6123 April 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 141/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 141/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 141/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8552 — Axalta Coating Systems / IVA) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 141/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8552 — Axalta Coating Systems / IVA) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 21.330 Apportionment. ( a ) *General.* Where in order, VA will apportion subsistence allowance in accordance with § 3.451 of this title, subject to the limitations of § 3.458 of this title. If the veteran is in receipt of benefits at the Chapter 30 rate, VA will not apportion these benefits. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307(c))
( b ) *Effective date.* The effective date of apportionment will be as prescribed in § 3.400(e) of this title. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307(c))
( c ) *Child adopted out of family.* Where evidence establishes that a veteran is the natural parent of a child or children legally adopted outside of the veteran's family, VA will apportion in favor of the child or children only that additional amount of subsistence allowance payable on account of the existence of the child or children. The veteran is not entitled in his or her own right to the additional amount of subsistence allowance payable for the child because of the existence of the child unless the veteran is contributing to the child's support. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307(c))
( d ) *Veteran convicted of a felony.* The subsistence allowance of a veteran in a rehabilitation program after October 17, 1980, may not be apportioned if the veteran is incarcerated because of conviction for a felony.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(g))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 4284, Jan. 30, 1989; 57 FR 57108, Dec. 3, 1992]
§ 21.7280 Death benefit. ( a ) *Overview.* VA will pay a death benefit under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30 when an individual's death meets the criteria of this section; the individual is survived by someone described in this section; and the amount of educational assistance paid or payable to the individual is less than the amount reduced from the individual's basic pay. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3017; Pub. L. 100-689) (July 1, 1985)
( b ) *Necessary criteria for death benefit.* VA may pay a death benefit under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30 only if— ( 1 ) The individual either— ( i ) Dies while on active duty, or
( ii ) Dies after October 28, 1992, and his or her date of death is within one year after the date of his or her last discharge or release from active duty; and
( 2 ) The death of the individual is service connected. In determining if the death is service connected, VA will apply the provisions of § 3.312 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) Either— ( i ) At the time of the individual's death he or she is entitled to basic educational assistance through having met the eligibility requirements of § 21.7042, or
( ii ) At the time of the individual's death he or she is on active duty with the Armed Forces and but for the minimum service requirements of § 21.7042(a)(2) or § 21.7042(b)(3) or (4) or the educational requirements of § 21.7042(a)(3) or § 21.7042(b)(2) or both would be entitled to basic educational assistance through having met the eligibility requirements of § 21.7042. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3017(a))
( c ) *Payee.* ( 1 ) VA shall pay a death benefit to the living person or persons in the order listed in this paragraph. ( i ) The beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the individual under the individual's Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Policy,
( ii ) The surviving spouse of the individual,
( iii ) The surviving child or children of the individual, in equal shares,
( iv ) The surviving parent or parents of the individual in equal shares.
( 2 ) If none of the persons listed in this paragraph is living, VA shall not pay a death benefit under this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3017(a)(2); Pub. L. 100-689) (July 1, 1985)
( d ) *Amount of death benefit.* ( 1 ) The amount of any payment made under this section shall be equal to— ( i ) The amount reduced from the individual's basic pay as provided in § 21.7042(f) less—
( ii ) The total of— ( A ) The amount of educational assistance that has been paid to the individual under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30, and
( B ) The amount of accrued benefits paid or payable with respect to the individual.
( 2 ) VA shall pay no death benefit when the amount determined by subparagraph (1) of this paragraph is zero or less than zero.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3017 (b) and (c); Pub. L. 100-689) (July 1, 1985)
[56 FR 20136, May 2, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 15026, Apr. 24, 1992; 61 FR 6791, Feb. 22, 1996]
# Official Journal L 23/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6625 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 23

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6625 January 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/163 of 18 January 2023 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for DDT and oxathiapiprolin in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2023/164 of 24 January 2023 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) (EUMA/1/2023) | 18 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/165 of 12 January 2023 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Article 4: Stop torture and inhuman treatment at Europe’s borders’, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2023) 39) | 19 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/163 of 18 January 2023 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for DDT and oxathiapiprolin in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2023/164 of 24 January 2023 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) (EUMA/1/2023)

18

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/165 of 12 January 2023 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Article 4: Stop torture and inhuman treatment at Europe’s borders’, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2023) 39)

(notified under document C(2023) 39)

19

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 74.21 What are the ways a business may exit VIP Verification Program status? A participant may: ( a ) Voluntarily cancel its status by submitting a written request to CVE requesting that the concern be removed from public listing in the VIP database; or
( b ) Delete its record entirely from the VIP database; or
( c ) CVE may remove a participant immediately pursuant to § 74.2; or
( d ) CVE may remove a participant from public listing in the VIP database for good cause upon formal notice to the participant in accordance with § 74.22. Examples of good cause include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Submission of false information in the participant's VIP Verification application.
( 2 ) Failure by the participant to maintain its eligibility for program participation.
( 3 ) Failure by the participant for any reason, including the death of an individual upon whom eligibility was based, to maintain ownership, management, and control by veterans, service-disabled veterans, or surviving spouses.
( 4 ) Failure by the concern to disclose to CVE the extent to which non-veteran persons or firms participate in the management of the participant.
( 5 ) Failure to make required submissions or responses to CVE or its agents, including a failure to make available financial statements, requested tax returns, reports, information requested by CVE or VA's Office of Inspector General, or other requested information or data within 30 days of the date of request.
( 6 ) Cessation of the participant's business operations.
( 7 ) Failure by the concern to provide an updated VA Form 0877 within 30 days of any change in ownership, except as provided in § 74.3(f)(3).
( 8 ) Failure to inform CVE of any such changed circumstances, as outlined in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
( 9 ) Failure by the concern to obtain and keep current any and all required permits, licenses, and charters, including suspension or revocation of any professional license required to operate the business.
( e ) The examples of good cause listed in paragraph (d) of this section are intended to be illustrative only. Other grounds for canceling a participant's verified status include any other cause of so serious or compelling a nature that it affects the present responsibility of the participant.
[83 FR 48232, Sept. 24, 2018]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10378 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PABLO GUERRERO-RIVERA, also known as Pablo Eleazar Guerrero, also known as Pablo Eleazar Rivera, also known as Pablo Robert Guerrero, also known as Pablo Guerrero, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-301-ALL-A

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Pablo Guerrero-Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guerrero-Rivera has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counselNo. 04-10378 -2- is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.