alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Troy B. Steckenrider III, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of two:

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 (b)
[Omitted]; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: March 31, 2022  By: 
/s/ Troy B. Steckenrider III
   **Troy B. Steckenrider III**   **Chief Financial Officer**   **(Principal Financial Officer)****
1/2 

## EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

AD No : 2008-0014

Date: 17 January 2008

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthi ness Directive applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Directive unless otherwi se agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry. 

### Type Approval Holder’s Name : TURBOMECA Type/Model designation(s) : Arriel 1 series Turboshaft engines

TCDS Number : EASA E.073
Foreign AD : Not applicable
Supersedure : None



### ATA 73 Engine Fuel & Control – Fuel Control Unit (FCU) 3-way Union Plug – Inspection

Manufacturer(s): TURBOMECA

Applicability: Arriel 1E2, 1S and 1S1 turboshaft engines, all serial numbers. These engines are known to be installed on, but not limited to, Eurocopter Deutschland MBB-BK 117 series and Sikorsky S-76A series twin-engine helicopters.

Reason: A plug adapted for engine bench testing (called “red disk” plug) and not approved for service operation, could inadvertently be installed on the engine Fuel Control Unit 3-way union, instead of the sealed plug approved for service operation. Turboméca S.A. has informed EASA of a case of a “red disk” plug that has been actually installed on an engine which has been subsequently released for service operation. This engine ex perienced an in-service high pressure leak event (at the fuel pump outlet) due to cracking of this “red disk“ plug. This leak could lead to in-flight flame-out and/or possibly a fire. For the reasons described above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires a one-time inspection and corrective action, as necessary. Effective Date: 31 January 2008

Compliance: Within 100 operating hours from effective date of this AD, perform a one time inspection of the correct reference of the plug installed on the FCU 3- way union (9 932 30 706 0) and verify its torque to be set between 1.3 and 1.5 daN.m in accordance with Turboméca Mandatory Service Bulletin 292 73 0817.2/2 Ref. Publications: Turboméca, S.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 292 73 0817 dated 06 December 2007. The use of later approved revisions of this document is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this AD.

Remarks : 1. If requested and appro priately substantiated, EASA can accept Alternative Methods of Compliance for this AD. 2. This AD was posted on 17 December 2007 as PAD 07-226 for consultation until 14 January 2008. No comments were received during the consultation period. 3. Enquiries regarding this AD should be referred to the AD Focal Point - Certification Directorate, EASA; E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu

. 4. For any question concerning the te chnical content of the requirements in this AD, please contact: Turboméca, S.A., ARRIEL 1 Cu stomer Support, 40220 TARNOS, FRANCE. Fax: +33 5 59 74 45 15; or contact your nearest technical representative at www.turbomeca-support.com
§ 1006.10 Acquisition of location information. ( a ) *Definition.* The term *location information* means a consumer's: ( 1 ) Place of abode and telephone number at such place; or
( 2 ) Place of employment.
( b ) *Form and content of location communications.* A debt collector communicating with a person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information must: ( 1 ) Identify himself or herself individually by name, state that he or she is confirming or correcting the consumer's location information, and, only if expressly requested, identify his or her employer;
( 2 ) Not state that the consumer owes any debt;
( 3 ) Not communicate by postcard;
( 4 ) Not use any language or symbol on any envelope or in the contents of any communication by mail indicating that the debt collector is in the debt collection business or that the communication relates to the collection of a debt; and
( 5 ) After the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with regard to the subject debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address, not communicate with any person other than that attorney, unless the attorney fails to respond to the debt collector's communication within a reasonable period of time.
( c ) *Frequency of location communications.* In addition to complying with § 1006.14(b)(1), a debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information about the consumer must not communicate more than once with such person unless requested to do so by such person, or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such person is erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location information.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00102-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 372nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1612394R

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JOHN RYAN COOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided 

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: December 30, 2021
p.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

152) VI-E-1 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:21 PM Sheet 152 of 198 
P.2 

A-83-27 / 4 ^ \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

| +MKri | Office of Air Quality Planning and Standard: 

\^iUa>J Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2771 VI-E-1 

\

 J J? 

*>t PRO^& 

? 6 APR 1£Sd 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Teleconference with Hunton & Williams Concerning 

Hawaiian Electric's Petition for Recjjnsideration 

FROM: Fred L. Porter, Chief TT"..~-_S_ ' V*-,"fr.,~ 

Regulation Development Section, SDB (MD-13) 

TO: Docket fo,A-f)-J7 

The teleconference was initiated by Hunton & Williams at 11:00 a.m. 

on March 25, 1988. Their objective was to determine if there was any 

information they and/or their client could provide which might help or 

aid the Agency in considering the merits of Hawaiian Electric's petition 

for reconsideration. Participating in the teleconference were: 

Walt Stevenson and Fred Porter, EPA, OAQPS 

Chris Herman, EPA, OGC 

Henry Nickel and Mel Schulze, Hunton & Williams 

We asked if Hawaiian Electric and/or Hunton & Williams could 

provide data and information in the following areas: 

1. Quantities and sulfur contents of individual residual fuel 

oils used by Hawaiian Electric over the past 2 years? 

2. Quantities and sulfur contents of individual distillate fuel 

oils used by Hawaiian Electric over the past 2 years? 

3. Quantities and sulfur contents of residual fuel oils used by 

non-utility sources over the past 2 years in the Hawaiian islands? 

4. Quantities and sulfur contents of distillate fuel oils used 

by non-utility sources over the past 2 years in the Hawaiian islands? 

5. Capacity of any refinery distillate or residual fuel oil 

desulfurization capacity in the Hawaiian islands? 

6. Quantities and sulfur contents of residual and distillate 

fuel oils imported into the Hawaiian islands over the past 2 years? 

7. Overview of the residual and distillate fuel oil distribution 

system which exists within the Hawaiian islands? 

cc: Chris Herman (LE-132A) Mel Schulze, Hunton & Williams 

Fred Porter (MD-13) Henry Nickel, Hunton & Williams 

Walt Stevenson (MD-13)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2499

BEKELECH TERESA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-416-950) Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua O.A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Springs, Maryland, for Petitioner. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Senior Litigation Counsel, John D. Williams, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bekelech Teresa petitions this court to review the denial of her application for asylum by the Board of Immigrations Appeals (Board). We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order denying asylum and find no reversible error. Accordingly the petition for review is dismissed and we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Bekelech v. INS , No. A72-416-950 (BIA Sept. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000792984
<NAME> RADVA CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                       247
<INVENTORY>                                      1,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,791
<PP&E>                                           8,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,668
<BONDS>                                          1,272
<COMMON>                                            37
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,974
<SALES>                                          2,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,171
<CGS>                                            1,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          40,912
<SECURITIES>                                 1,058,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,250
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,529,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,529,602
<SALES>                                         10,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,262
<CGS>                                            4,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 01- 14

- 00738

- CR No. 01- 14

- 00739

- CR

In the 

### Court of Appeals For the 

### First District of Texas At Houston



No. 1383989 No. 1383990 In the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas




### WILLIAM HORHN Appellant

v. 

### THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee




### STATE’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:
COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for extension of

time in which to file the State’s brief in th is case, and, in support thereof, presents the following: ACCEPTED 01-14-00739-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/30/2015 5:13:27 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK1. In the 338th District Court of Harris County, Texas, on August 27, 2014, in cause

number 13839 89, the Appellant was convicted in The State of Texas v. William

Columbus Horhn. 2. For the offense of debit card abuse, Appellant was sentenced to sixth months in state jail. 3. In the 338th District Court of Harris County, Texas, on August 27, 2014, in cause number 1383990, the Appellant was convicted in The State of Texas v. William

Columbus Horhn. 4. For the offense of fraudulent use of identifying information, Appellant was sentenced to twenty years in prison.

5

. W ritten notice s of appeal w ere time ly filed on August 27 , 2014

.
6

. The Appellant’s brief was filed with this Court on February 23, 2015

.
7

. The State’s brief was due to be filed with this Court on April 30 , 201 5

.
8 . An extension of time in which to file the S tate’s brief is requested un til May 26 ,
2015

.
8

. One p revious extension of time ha s been granted to t he State.

9 . The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are: With his numerous duties as Chief of the Appellate Division, t he undersigned assistant district att orney has needed some additional time in order to respond to the appellant’s brief in this case

.WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will g r ant an extension of time until

May 26 , 2015 , in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectf ully submitted,

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826 TBC No. 05263700 curry_alan@dao.hctx.netCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy o f the foregoing instrument has been mai led to the
appellant ’s attorney at the following address es on April 30, 2015 :


### Mark Kratovil Attorney at Law 1201 Franklin Street, 13th Floor Houston, Texas 77002

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826 TBC No. 05263700 curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

Date: April 30, 2015
#### Otto J. Bueb, Respondent, *v.*Annie M. Geraty et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of replevin and from order denying the defendant’s motion on the minutes for a new trial.

Edmund T. Oldham (John F. Couch, of counsel), for appellants.

Edwin F. Stern, for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

On a careful examination of the appeal-book and consideration of every point raised by appellant’s brief, we do not find -that any reversible error has been committed.

*831Judgment and order appealed from is affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: Fitzsimoes, Ch. J., and Schtjchmae, J.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike McKeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 26, 2024  /s/ Mike McKeever  Mike McKeever  President  Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC  (senior officer in charge of securitization)
§ 11.110 Who may make application for final settlement. A mentally competent veteran to whom an adjusted service certificate has been issued. ( a ) A legally appointed guardian of an incompetent veteran. An application submitted by a legally appointed guardian must be accompanied by letters of guardianship showing the fiduciary relationship, provided such papers are not already on file in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) A representative of a physically incapacitated veteran. Where application is made by a representative of a physically incapacitated veteran, the representative must attach a statement describing the veteran's incapacity. The correctness of such statement must be certified by an officer as designated in § 11.114.
( c ) A superintendent or other bonded officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior to receive funds under the provision of Pub. L. No. 373, 72d Congress, may make application for an incompetent adult or minor Indian who is a recognized ward of the Government. The application must be accompanied by a certification from the superintendent or other bonded officer showing: ( 1 ) That the said beneficiary is a ward of the Government;
( 2 ) that no guardian or other fiduciary has been appointed;
( 3 ) that the officer making application has been designated by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with Pub. L. No. 373, 72d Congress;
( 4 ) that he is properly bonded; and
( 5 ) that he will receive, handle, and account for such benefits in accordance with existing law and regulations of the Department of Interior.
( d ) A manager of a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, or a manager or superintendent of a contract hospital or State institution where the veteran is a patient may make application as custodian for the veteran. Such application must be made with the approval of the regional chief attorney.
[19 FR 5087, Aug. 12, 1954]