alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4407 Guaranteed and direct loans. ( a ) In any case where, in addition to using the benefits of 38 U.S.C. chapter 21, the eligible individual will use his or her entitlement to the loan guaranty benefits of 38 U.S.C. chapter 37, the complete transaction must be in accord with applicable regulations found in this part.
( b ) In any case where, in addition to using the benefits of 38 U.S.C. chapter 21, the eligible individual will use a direct loan under 38 U.S.C. 3711(i), the complete transaction must be in accord with the requirements of § 36.4503 and the loan must be secured by the same housing unit to be purchased, constructed, or adapted with the proceeds of the specially adapted housing grant.
( c ) In any case where, in addition to using the benefits of 38 U.S.C. chapter 21, the eligible individual will use the Native American Direct Loan benefit under 38 U.S.C. chapter 37, subchapter V, the eligible individual's ownership interest in the housing unit must comport with the requirements found in §§ 36.4501, 36.4512, and 36.4527 and in the tribal documents approved by the Secretary, which include, but may not be limited to, the Memorandum of Understanding, the residential lease of tribal-owned land, the tribal lending ordinances, and any relevant tribal resolutions.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2101(d), 3711(i), 3762)
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Bahrain

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Bahrain			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Bahrain 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Bahrain

During the review period, the government made significant progress by publishing for the first time its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period of time.  The government published its enacted budget and mid-year budget execution report within a reasonable period of time.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available.  Publicly available budget documents provided only limited detail on allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises and debt of all major state-owned enterprises was not disclosed.  Only partial details were available on ministry and agency budgets.  Royal court expenditures were not included in the budget.  Budget documents were generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution audited the government’s executed budget, but only published portions of its audit report in local newspapers.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were outlined in law and regulation and appeared to be followed in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund disclosed its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals. Bahrain’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing its executive budget proposal within a reasonable period of time;
- disclosing comprehensive information on allocations to, earnings from, and debt obligations of all major state-owned enterprises;
- providing more detail in the budget on expenditures by ministries and the royal court; and
- making the supreme audit institution’s audit reports available in full and easily accessible to the public.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Bahrain 

Tags

BahrainBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
----

(2004/C 65 E/086)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1394/03

by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 April 2003)

Subject:   The European Commission's Food and Veterinary Office in Ireland

Would the Commission please indicate which companies were responsible for the design and the construction of the European Commission's Food and Veterinary Offices in Ireland?

Please could the Commission also provide:

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(19 June 2003)

The European Commission's Food and Veterinary Office in Grange, Ireland was procured through the Office of Public Works (OPW) in Dublin. The building was designed by the Architectural Services Division of OPW and the contract for construction, following tender procedures, was awarded to Michael Mc Namara & Co.

----
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00370

- CR

HARVEY LEELANE SEARC Y , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 39316CR

ORDER

On June 6, 2016, we received another document sent to us by appellant himself in
the above referenced matter; and on June 17, 2016, we received yet another one. A copy
of the documents are enclosed with this Order. A party represented by counsel is not

e ntitled to hybrid representation. Ex parte Taylor , 36 S.W. 3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App.

2001).
Appellant has sent numerous writings to this Court. We have forwarded these
writings to appellant’s retained counsel and have advised counsel to ask her clien t to stopSearcy v. State Page 2

sending writings to us. This has been unsuccessful in stemming the flow of writings to
us by appellant. Accordingly, we ORDER counsel to notify appellant of the prohibition
of hybrid representation.
Further, we ORDER counsel to notify appella nt that we will not acknowledge or
respond to documents sent to this Court by appellant while an attorney of record
represents the client’s interest.
Finally, we ORDER counsel to notify appellant that the Court will no longer
forward communications from ap pellant to counsel.

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed June 22 , 2016
Exhibit 4.85


 


Maximum Guarantee
Contract


 


Contract No.: 2014 JIYINZUIQUANDAIZI NO.14120745


 


Pledgor : LI YONG HUI


 


Pledgee : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : June 27, 2014


 


Pledge Definition : To ensure multiple loans Party B (Pledgee) has
lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd, Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Guarantee hereunder for Party
B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB60, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From June 27, 2014 to December 23, 2015
§ 1070.5 Service of summonses and complaints. ( a ) Only the General Counsel is authorized to receive and accept summonses or complaints sought to be served upon the CFPB or CFPB employees sued in their official capacity. Such documents should be served upon the General Counsel, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552. This authorization for receipt shall in no way affect the requirements of service elsewhere provided in applicable rules and regulations.
( b ) If, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, any summons or complaint described in that paragraph is delivered to an employee of the CFPB, the employee shall decline to accept the proffered service and may notify the person attempting to make service of the regulations set forth herein. If, notwithstanding this instruction, an employee accepts service of a document described in paragraph (a) of this section, the employee shall immediately notify and deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to the General Counsel.
( c ) When a CFPB employee is sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on behalf of the CFPB (whether or not the officer or employee is also sued in an official capacity), the employee by law is to be served personally with process. *See* Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(3). An employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on behalf of the CFPB shall immediately notify, and deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to, the General Counsel.
( d ) The CFPB will only accept service of process for an employee sued in his or her official capacity. Documents for which the General Counsel accepts service in official capacity shall be marked “Service Accepted in Official Capacity Only.” Acceptance of service shall not constitute an admission or waiver with respect to jurisdiction, propriety of service, improper venue, or any other defense in law or equity available under applicable laws or rules.
[83 FR 46084, Sept. 12, 2018]
§ 1071.103 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $7 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; or
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees.
( 6 ) For purposes of receiving an award for fees and expenses for defending against an excessive Bureau demand, any small entity, as that term is defined under 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
( c ) For purposes of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual or group of individuals, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or any corporation or entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate of that business for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs...2020 Investment Climate Statements

# 					2020 Investment Climate Statements			

							The U.S. Department of State’s Investment Climate Statements provide country-specific information on the business climates of more than 170 countries and economies. They are prepared by economic officers stationed in embassies and posts around the world and analyze a variety of economies that are or could be markets for U.S. businesses of all sizes.						

 In this section										/

													Global Overview											

            -  Global Overview   
            -  Country Reports                -  Africa (Sub-Saharan) 
              -  East Asia and Pacific 
              -  Europe and Eurasia 
              -  Near East (Middle East and North Africa) 
              -  South and Central Asia 
              -  Western Hemisphere 

							Global Overview					

Topics include Openness to Investment, Legal and Regulatory systems, Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property Rights, Transparency, Performance Requirements, State-Owned Enterprises, Responsible Business Conduct, and Corruption.

There are select examples of economies expanding openness to investment, improving transparency, and helping new businesses open. This likely reflects an acknowledgment by those economies of the vital role the private sector can play in economic competitiveness and growth.

On the other hand, the reports highlight a variety of challenges and barriers, such as local content requirements, lack of adequate transparency, problems with corruption, and sectors closed to foreign businesses.

							Country Reports					

### Africa (Sub-Saharan)

### East Asia and Pacific

### Europe and Eurasia

### Near East (Middle East and North Africa)

### South and Central Asia

### Western Hemisphere

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsInvestment ClimateInvestment Climate Statements

## View report by:

### On This Page

                -  Global Overview   
                -  Country Reports                    -  Africa (Sub-Saharan) 
                  -  East Asia and Pacific 
                  -  Europe and Eurasia 
                  -  Near East (Middle East and North Africa) 
                  -  South and Central Asia 
                  -  Western Hemisphere 

Back to Top

01 / Select a Year

02 / Select Sections	

                  -  Select All Sections 

03 / Select Countries You can add more than one country or area.

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 40.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs”, issued on July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on State processes and on State, areawide, regional, and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to improve the internal management of the VA, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the VA or its officers.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
42338.

#### ROSS v. CITY OF LILBURN.

Argued October 3, 1966

Decided October 7, 1966.

*William W. Miller, Jr., John M. Hames,*for appellant.

Deen, Judge.

1. *Code Ann.*§ 19-302 specifies that a traverse to an answer to a petition for certiorari “shall be filed in writing, specifying the defects, within 15 days after the filing of such answer.” Accordingly, where the answer was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Gwinnett County on May 25, 1966, and the traverse was not filed until June 10, it was proper to sustain a motion to dismiss the traverse. The mere fact that a copy of the answer which was mailed to defendant’s counsel on May 25 was not received until May 27 is irrelevant. Chapter 19-3 does not in terms call for serving a copy of the answer upon the defendant. This action is necessitated by *Code Ann.*§ 81-301 relating to service of pleadings generally, which was complied with. A failure to serve the copy at the time of filing would have resulted in the right to a continuance *(Wright Contracting Co. v. Waller,*89 Ga. App. 827 (2c) (81 SE2d 541)), but *here*the copy was mailed on the same day on which the answer was filed.

2. *Code Ann.*§ 68-1707 requires that motor vehicles used by the police on official business shall be marked on the back and on each side. This is an expression of the public policy of the state that vehicles used for the purpose of traffic arrests shall be identified, and where failure to make such identification is the proximate cause of injury, a civil action will lie. *Poole v. City of Louisville,*107 Ga. App. 305 (130 SE2d 157). We are cited to no authority, however, for the proposition that use of a vehicle which, although marked, is not marked in accordance with this statute, will void an otherwise valid arrest, nor do we conceive this to be the law, especially where there is no contention on the part of the defendant that he was ignorant of the identity of the officers or that any act on his part was caused by his ignorance of their identity.

The judge of the superior court properly overruled the petition for certiorari from a conviction in the Mayor’s Court of the City of Lilburn.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*

*429
      *Webb & Fowler, W. Howard Fowler, William G. Tanner,*for appellee.
§ 1011.30 Persons to whom subpart B is inapplicable. Newspaper or periodical publishers, job printers, broadcasters, or telecasters, or any of the employees thereof, are not subject to this subpart unless the publishers, printers, broadcasters, or telecasters: ( a ) Have actual knowledge of the falsity of the advertisement or
( b ) Have any interest in the subdivision advertised or
( c ) Also serve directly or indirectly as the advertising agent or agency for the developer.
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.3 Request for Temporary Waiver. ( a ) *Who can file a Request for Temporary Waiver.* The State Appraisal Agency for the State in which the temporary waiver relief is sought may file a Request for Temporary Waiver.
( b ) *Contents and receipt of a Request for Temporary Waiver.* A Request for Temporary Waiver from a State Appraisal Agency will not be deemed received by the ASC unless it fully and accurately sets out: ( 1 ) A written determination by the State Appraisal Agency that there is a scarcity of certified or licensed appraisers leading to significant delays in the performance of appraisals for FRTs or a specified class of FRTs within either a portion of, or the entire State;
( 2 ) The requirement(s) of State law from which relief is being sought;
( 3 ) The nature of the scarcity of certified or licensed appraisers (including supporting documentation, statistical or otherwise verifiable);
( 4 ) The extent of the delays anticipated or experienced in the performance of appraisals by certified or licensed appraisers (including supporting documentation, statistical or otherwise verifiable);
( 5 ) How complaints concerning appraisals by persons who are not certified or licensed would be processed in the event a temporary waiver is granted; and
( 6 ) Meaningful suggestions and recommendations for remedying the situation.
( c ) *Receipt of a Request for Temporary Waiver.* A Request for Temporary Waiver shall be deemed received for purposes of publication in the Federal Register for notice and comment if the ASC determines that the information submitted meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section to support that a scarcity of appraisers exists and that the scarcity is leading to significant delays in the performance of appraisals for FRTs or a specified class of FRTs within either a portion of, or the entire State.
( d ) *Deny or refer back.* In the event the Request for Temporary Waiver is not deemed received, it may be denied in its entirety or referred back to the State Appraisal Agency for further action. In either case, the ASC shall provide written notice to the State Appraisal Agency providing an explanation for the determination.
§ 1070.45 Affirmative disclosure of confidential information. ( a ) The CFPB may disclose confidential information, in accordance with applicable law, as follows: ( 1 ) To a CFPB employee, as that term is defined in § 1070.2 and in accordance with § 1070.41;
( 2 ) To either House of the Congress or to an appropriate committee or subcommittee of the Congress, as set forth in 12 U.S.C. 5562(d)(2), provided that, upon the receipt by the CFPB of a request from the Congress for confidential information that a financial institution submitted to the CFPB along with a claim that such information consists of a trade secret or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, or confidential supervisory information, the CFPB shall notify the financial institution in writing of its receipt of the request and provide the institution with a copy of the request;
( 3 ) In investigational hearings and witness interviews, or otherwise in the investigation and administration of enforcement actions, as is reasonably necessary, at the discretion of the CFPB;
( 4 ) In an administrative or court proceeding to which the CFPB is a party. In the case of confidential investigative information that contains any trade secret or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, as claimed by designation by the submitter of such material, or confidential supervisory information, the submitter, or the CFPB, in its discretion, may seek an appropriate order prior to disclosure of such material in a proceeding;
( 5 ) In CFPB personnel matters, as necessary and subject to appropriate protections;
( 6 ) To agencies in summary form to the extent necessary to confer with such agencies about matters relevant to the exercise of the agencies' statutory or regulatory authority; or
( 7 ) As required under any other applicable law.
( b ) [Reserved]