alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification Pursuant toSection 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silverado Gold Mines
Ltd;

1.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

2.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

3.      The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Issuers fiscal quarter ending
August 31, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.

4.      The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditor and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: October 16, 2006

/s/ Garry L. AnselmoGarry
L. Anselmo Principal Accounting Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2379 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2379

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require staff working 
with developmentally disabled individuals to call emergency services in 
               the event of a life-threatening situation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2007

   Mr. Holt (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
    Payne, Mr. Towns, Mr. Jefferson, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. 
Grijalva, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. 
  Ferguson, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of 
   California, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. 
   Norton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require staff working 
with developmentally disabled individuals to call emergency services in 
               the event of a life-threatening situation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Danielle's Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF STAFF WORKING WITH DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED 
              PERSONS TO CALL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN THE EVENT OF A 
              LIFE-THREATENING SITUATION.

    (a) Requirement.--Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (66), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (67), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (67) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(68) provide, in accordance with regulations of the 
        Secretary, that direct care staff providing health-related 
        services to a person with a developmental disability or 
        traumatic brain injury are required to call the 911 emergency 
        telephone service or equivalent emergency management service 
        for assistance in the event of a life-threatening emergency to 
        such person and to report such call to the appropriate State 
        agency or department.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Motion Granted and Order filed August 7 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00726

- CV

____________ LAURA MARCIA JONES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR FOR THE EST ATE OF BYFORD ATHAL JONES,

DECEASED , Appellant

V

. AQUINAS OIL & GAS, L .L.C. , Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 422,684

- 401



### ORDER The court abated this appeal on May 22, 2018 to allow the parties to engage in settlement discussions. On July 23, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion to extend the abatement period to allow continued settlement negotiations. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following order.
The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from thiscourt’s active docket until September 6 , 2018 . The appeal will be reinstated on

this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate
moti on to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell.
§ 1.940 Scope and application. Except as otherwise provided in § 1.945: ( a ) The standards set forth in §§ 1.940 through 1.944 apply to the suspension or termination of collection activity pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 on debts that do not exceed $100,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, after deducting the amount of partial payments or collections, if any. Prior to referring a debt to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for litigation, VA may suspend or terminate collection under this part with respect to the debt.
( b ) If, after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections, the principal amount of a debt exceeds $100,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, the authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with DOJ. If VA believes that suspension or termination of any debt in excess of $100,000 may be appropriate, it shall refer the debt to the Civil Division or other appropriate division in DOJ, using the Claims Collection Litigation Report (CCLR). The referral should specify the reasons for VA's recommendation. If, prior to referral to DOJ, VA determines that a debt is plainly erroneous or clearly without legal merit, VA may terminate collection activity regardless of the amount involved without obtaining DOJ concurrence.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)
[69 FR 62199, Oct. 25, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 53201, Aug. 31, 2010]
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4506 Recasting.

In the event of default or to avoid imminent default, the Department of Veterans Affairs may at any time enter into an agreement with the borrower which will permit the latter temporarily to repay the obligation on a basis appropriate to the borrower's apparent current ability to pay or may enter into an appropriate recasting or extension agreement: *Provided,* That no such agreement shall extend the ultimate repayment of a loan beyond the expiration of 30 years and 32 days from the date of the loan. *Provided further,* That nothing in this section shall be deemed to limit the forbearance or indulgence which the Secretary may extend in an individual case pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 3720(f).

[46 FR 43675, Aug. 31, 1981]
§ 64.8 Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA). When funds are available for RVCP grants, VA will publish a NOFA in the Federal Register and in Grants.gov (*http://www.grants.gov*). The NOFA will identify: ( a ) The location for obtaining RVCP grant applications, including the specific forms that will be required;
( b ) The date, time, and place for submitting completed RVCP grant applications;
( c ) The estimated total amount of funds available and the maximum funds available to a single grantee;
( d ) The minimum number of total points and points per category that an applicant must receive to be considered for a grant and information regarding the scoring process;
( e ) Any timeframes and manner for payments under the RVCP grant; and
( f ) Other information necessary for the RVCP grant application process, as determined by VA, including contact information for the office that will oversee the RVCP within VA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 523 note)
# L_2008252EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### § 14.634 Banks or trust companies acting as guardians.

Banks or trust companies, corporate entities, acting as guardians for claimants, may be represented before adjudicating agencies as authorized representatives of claimants by an officer or employee, including a regularly employed attorney, if the employee or attorney represents the corporation in its fiduciary capacity.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5903, 5904)

[43 FR 46535, Oct. 10, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992; 68 FR 8547, Feb. 24, 2003]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2021-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2022
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Eswatini

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Eswatini			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Eswatini 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Eswatini

During the review period, budget documents were available to the general public; however, the executive budget proposal and the end-of-year report were not available online within a reasonable amount of time.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available online.  While budget documents provided a general picture of government revenues and expenditures, expenditures for royal emoluments were not broken down.  Information in the budget was considered generally reliable.  Eswatini’s supreme audit institution published an audit report within a reasonable period of time.  However the supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence.  The criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts were outlined in law, but the opacity of the procedures, which involve submitting applications for licenses directly to the king, cast doubt on whether the government actually followed the law in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not always publicly available.  Sovereign wealth funds do not disclose source of funding and general approach to withdrawals. Eswatini’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing the executive budget proposal and end-of-year report online within a reasonable period of time;
- providing expenditure information for royal emoluments broken down by type in budget documents;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- demonstrating applicable laws are followed in practice for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses;
- making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available; and
- disclosing sovereign wealth funds’ sources of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Eswatini 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentEswatini

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 1002.103 Covered applications. ( a ) *Covered application.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, covered application means an oral or written request for a covered credit transaction that is made in accordance with procedures used by a financial institution for the type of credit requested.
( b ) *Circumstances that are not covered applications.* A covered application does not include: ( 1 ) Reevaluation, extension, or renewal requests on an existing business credit account, unless the request seeks additional credit amounts.
( 2 ) Inquiries and prequalification requests.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 12, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00017

- CR

James MO ODY

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 413867 The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Pat Montgomery, counsel for appellant, has filed a third request for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief. This court granted appellants’ prior two requests for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief. We grant appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief. We order Pat Montgomery to file the appellant’s brief by August 30, 2016.

Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the

e fforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court generally does not consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraord inary circumstance.

Counsel is further advised that if the appellant’s brief or a motion strictly complying with this order is not timely filed, the appeal will be abated and the case remanded to the trial court for an abandonment hearing.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of August, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.402 Who may file a petition for a derivation proceeding.

An applicant for patent may file a petition to institute a derivation proceeding in the Office.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Mintz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/David Mintz*
--------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2005


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### Matter of the Application of James F. McGuire, Respondent, *v.*Frederick H. Schroeder, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

April, 1900.)

Supplementary proceedings — Affidavit for second examination.

An affidavit of a judgment creditor to the effect that he “ verily believes ” that the judgment debtor has acquired certain property, *180specified, since his first examination in supplementary proceedings was abandoned without result, is an insufficient basis for the granting of an order for a second examination, as the grounds of the affiant’s belief must be stated.

Appeal from an order denying a motion on behalf of a judgment-debtor, Frederick H. Schroeder, to vacate and set aside a second order in supplementary proceedings for his examination.

Hichols *&*Bacon (George Edwin Joseph, of counsel), for'appellant.

Lavinia Bally, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

The motion-was made on the ground of the insufficiency of the moving affidavit, the affidavit alleging “ That an examination of the judgment-debtor, under the judgment of plaintiff, was had in 1897 and discontinued and abandoned and no property was reached or discovered on said examination; that deponent *verily believes*that since said examination the said Frederick H. Schroeder has acquired property and is now the owner of a thousand shares of stock in the Standard Gold Production Co. of Boulder County, Colorado, worth more than the sum of one thousand dollars.”

A second order for the examination of a judgment-debtor will not be granted, except upon proof that he has since acquired property, and the allegation in the affidavit that the deponent *v&rily believes*the defendant has acquired property, is insufficient. He should have stated the ¿rounds for that belief, and, having failed to do so, the affidavit is defective, and the motion to- dismiss the proceeding should have been granted. Pierce v. Parrish, 28 App. Div. 624; Losee v. Allen, 17 Misc. Rep. 275.

Order appealed from reversed and motion to vacate and set aside the second order for the examination of the judgment-debtor granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. to- be credited upon the judgment herein.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Order reversed and motion granted, with ten dollars to be credited upon judgment herein.