# Official Journal C 90/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6319 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6319 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 90/01 | Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 90/01

Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2020/C 90/02 | Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2019 in Case E-1/19 Andreas Gyrre v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality
  (Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot) | 2 |
| 2020/C 90/03 | Judgment of the Court of 13 December 2019 in Case E-1/18 EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway
  (Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits) | 3 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 90/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2020/C 90/02

Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2019 in Case E-1/19 Andreas Gyrre v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality
  (Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot)

(Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot)

2

2020/C 90/03

Judgment of the Court of 13 December 2019 in Case E-1/18 EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway
  (Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

(Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

3

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 90/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 March 2020

(2020/C 90/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0934 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4732 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0223 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0546 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7010 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,154 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 351,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5010 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8450 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,0491 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8568 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5749 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4917 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8727 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5760 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 377,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,5624 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6925 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5935 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 892,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7793 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,441 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,0959 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,448 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6133 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,2014 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1355 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0934

JPY

Japanese yen

117,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4732

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92190

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0223

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0546

ISK

Iceland króna

152,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7010

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,154

HUF

Hungarian forint

351,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5010

RON

Romanian leu

4,8450

TRY

Turkish lira

7,0491

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8568

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5749

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4917

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8727

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5760

KRW

South Korean won

1 377,80

ZAR

South African rand

18,5624

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6925

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5935

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 892,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7793

PHP

Philippine peso

56,441

RUB

Russian rouble

87,0959

THB

Thai baht

35,448

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6133

MXN

Mexican peso

26,2014

INR

Indian rupee

81,1355

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

V Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 December 2019

in Case E-1/19

Andreas Gyrre

v

The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality

(Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot)

(2020/C 90/02)

In Case E-1/19, Andreas Gyrre v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Borgarting Court of Appeal (Borgarting lagmannsrett) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and in particular point 9 of Annex I thereto, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), and Siri Teigum (ad hoc Judge), gave judgment on 14 December 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:

Point 9 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as encompassing situations in which a trader states or otherwise creates the impression, based on the overall impression conveyed to the average consumer at the time of the transactional decision, that a product can legally be sold when it cannot. It does not have a bearing on that assessment whether such a national legislative prohibition, as in the present case, applies in either the EEA State of sale or the EEA State of performance or in both. Nor is that assessment affected by the national legislative prohibition in question being subsequently found to be contrary to EEA law.

---

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 13 December 2019

in Case E-1/18

EFTA Surveillance Authority

v

The Kingdom of Norway

(Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

(2020/C 90/03)

In Case E-1/18, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that, by maintaining in force provisions such as Section 14-13 first, second and third paragraphs and Section 14-14 first paragraph of the National Insurance Act, which render the father’s entitlement to parental benefits dependent on the mother’s situation whereas the mother’s entitlement is not dependent on the father’s situation, Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1)(c) of the Act referred to at point 21b of Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)), the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), and Siri Teigum (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 13 December 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 90/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Salini Impregilo S.p.A. (‘Salini Impregilo’, Italy); |
| --- | --- |

—

Salini Impregilo S.p.A. (‘Salini Impregilo’, Italy);

| — | Astaldi S.p.A. (‘Astaldi’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

Astaldi S.p.A. (‘Astaldi’, Italy).

Salini Impregilo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Astaldi.

The concentration is accomplished in two phases: first, the acquisition of control will be accomplished through contractual rights arising from an offer submitted by Salini Impregilo to Astaldi’s controlling shareholder and, at the end of the court-supervised insolvency proceedings, by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Salini Impregilo: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in 10 EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in other 30 countries outside the EEA; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Salini Impregilo: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in 10 EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in other 30 countries outside the EEA;

| — | for Astaldi: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in four EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in 14 countries outside the EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Astaldi: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in four EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in 14 countries outside the EEA.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---