alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1010.4 Exemptions—general. ( a ) The exemptions available under §§ 1010.5 through 1010.16 are not applicable when the method of sale, lease or other disposition of land or an interest in land is adopted for the purpose of evasion of the Act.
( b ) With the exception of the sales or leases which are exempt under § 1010.5, the anti-fraud provisions of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1703(a)(2)) apply to exempt transactions. The anti-fraud provisions make it unlawful for a developer or agent to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to: ( 1 ) Defraud;
( 2 ) To obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact, or
( 3 ) To omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made not misleading, with respect to any information pertinent to the lot or subdivision; or
( 4 ) To engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a purchaser.
( c ) The anti-fraud provisions of the Act require that certain representations be included in the contract in transactions which are not exempt under § 1010.5. Specifically, the Act requires that if a developer or agent represents that roads, sewers, water, gas or electric service or recreational amenities will be provided or completed by the developer, the contract must stipulate that the services or amenities will be provided or completed.
( d ) Eligibility for exemptions available under §§ 1010.5 through 1010.14 is self-determining. With the exception of the exemptions available under §§ 1010.15 and 1010.16, a developer is not required to file notice with or obtain the approval of the Director in order to take advantage of an exemption. If a developer elects to take advantage of an exemption, the developer is responsible for maintaining records to demonstrate that the requirements of the exemption have been met.
( e ) A developer may present evidence, or otherwise discuss, in an informal hearing before the Office of Supervision Examinations, the Bureau's position on the jurisdiction or non-exempt status of a particular subdivision.
[76 FR 79489, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 29115, May 11, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Research Frontiers
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Saxe,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert L. Saxe
    Robert L. Saxe
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    August 10, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-113289-08]
          - RIN 1545-BH81

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on notice of proposed rulemaking on modifications of the regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (Circular 230).

# DATES:

The public hearing, originally scheduled for November 20, 2009 at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Regina Johnson of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 (74 FR 37183) announced that a public hearing was scheduled for November 20, 2009, at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under Circular 230 of the Internal Revenue Code.                

                    The public comment period for these regulations expired on September 10, 2009. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the hearing were due on September 10, 2009. The notice of proposed                           ( print page 48889)                        rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak, and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Monday, September 21, 2009, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for November 20, 2009, is cancelled.                

LaNita VanDyke,

Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. E9-23159 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Cotton: World Markets and Trade            FAS

----

Frequency of Release:Monthly

----

Category:Crops and Crop Products:Cotton and Cottonseed

Keywords:cottoncrop yieldcropland harvestedexportsimportstrade

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 
            -  3 
            -  4 
            -  5 
            -  ... 
            -  27 
            -  28 

| Sep 12, 2024 | PDF | Sep 12, 2024: Cotton: World Markets and Trade detailsx                Sep 12, 2024: Cotton: World Markets and TradeRelease datetime:Sep 12, 2024Close |
|--------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:Foreign Agricultural Service

Contact email:Press@fas.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
1The HONORABLE ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, United States Bankruptcy

Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1077

___________

In re: Richard Charles Tolbert, *

*

Debtor, *

------------------------------------------------ *

* Appeal from the United States

Richard Charles Tolbert, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

* For the Eighth Circuit.

Appellant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Richard Fink, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 6, 2001

 Filed: July 20, 2001 

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Charles Tolbert appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s affirmance of

the bankruptcy court’s1 dismissal of his Chapter 13 petition. For the reasons explained

in the bankruptcy appellate panel’s opinion, we affirm the decision of the bankruptcy
-2-

court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The appellee is awarded double costs because the appeal

is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Maud *Van*Buren Holme, Respondent, *v.*Thomas E. Crimmins, Appellant.

Appeal from an order granting, in part only, a bill of particulars, and denying motion therefor in part.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. Wing, for respondent.

Hascall, J.

We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary and should follow those ordered by the Special Term.

So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.
§ 101.4 Treatment of covered savings associations. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *National bank activities.* Except as provided in this section, a covered savings association may engage in any activity that is permissible for a similarly located national bank to engage in as part of, or incidental to, the business of banking, or explicitly authorized by statute for a national bank, subject to the same authorization, terms, and conditions that would apply to a similarly located national bank, as determined by the OCC for purposes of this part.
( 2 ) *Treatment as a Federal savings association.* A covered savings association shall continue to comply with the provisions of law that apply to Federal savings associations for purposes of: ( i ) Governance (including incorporation, bylaws, boards of directors, shareholders, members, and distribution of dividends);
( ii ) Consolidation, merger, dissolution, conversion (including conversion to a stock bank or to another charter), conservatorship, and receivership;
( iii ) Provisions of law applicable only to Federal mutual savings associations;
( iv ) Offers and sales of securities at an office of a Federal savings association;
( v ) Savings bank activities authorized by section 5(i)(4) of HOLA;
( vi ) Issuance of subordinated debt securities and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock;
( vii ) Increases in permanent capital of a Federal stock savings association;
( viii ) Rules of practice and procedure in adjudicatory proceedings;
( ix ) Rules for investigative proceedings and formal examination proceedings;
( x ) Removals, suspensions, and prohibitions where a crime is charged or proven;
( xi ) Security procedures;
( xii ) Maintenance of records and recordkeeping and confirmation requirements for securities transactions;
( xiii ) Accounting and disclosure standards;
( xiv ) Nondiscrimination; and
( xv ) Advertising.
( b ) *Existing branches.* A covered savings association may continue to operate any branch or agency that the covered savings association operated on the effective date of the election.
( c ) *Assets greater than $20 billion.* A covered savings association may continue to operate as a covered savings association if, after the effective date of the election, it has total consolidated assets greater than $20 billion.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation



I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation,
state:



A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the
period from November 2, 2020 through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s
performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 11, 2020 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables
LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2020 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere
Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.



|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | John Deere Capital Corporation
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|                       |     |                               
|                       | By: | /s/ Katrin Watkins            
|                       |     | Katrin Watkins                
|                       |     | Assistant Secretary
#### § 59.4 Decisionmakers, notifications, and additional information.

The decisionmaker for decisions required under this part will be the Director, Capital Asset Management and Support, unless specified to be the Secretary or other VA official. The VA decisionmaker will provide written notice to affected States of approvals, denials, or requests for additional information under this part.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)

[66 FR 33847, June 26, 2001, as amended at 78 FR 21265, Apr. 10, 2013]
# Official Journal C 194/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.194.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5317 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.194.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5317 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 194/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 194/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 194/02 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2010/C 194/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 194/02

Euro exchange rates

5

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2010/C 194/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 194/04 | ESPON 2013 Programme — New Calls for Project Proposals | 8 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 194/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5910 — Martank/MTTI/VTTI) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 194/04

ESPON 2013 Programme — New Calls for Project Proposals

8

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 194/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5910 — Martank/MTTI/VTTI) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
717 A.2d 388

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Bruce Scott GILBERT.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 17,

Sept. Term, 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 11, 1998.

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Gail Kessler, Assistant Bar Counsel, for the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner.

F. Patrick Kelly, Rockville, for Respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 16-716 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Attorney Grievance Commission petitioned the Court for the suspension of the respondent, Bruce Scott Gilbert, from the practice of law in this State as a result of the respondent’s conviction for violation of Md.Code (1996 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, Sec. 287 (possession of cocaine) in the Circuit Court for Washington County.

After the respondent, in response to a show cause order, filed an answer in opposition to the petition, the Court held a hearing. Upon careful consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, it is this 11th day of September, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend attorney be, and it is hereby, DENIED.
§ 39.80 General requirements for a grant. ( a ) For a State or Tribal Organization to obtain a grant for the operation or maintenance of a State or Tribal veterans cemetery: ( 1 ) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA under § 39.81(e);
( 2 ) Its project must be ranked sufficiently high within Priority Group 4 as defined in § 39.3 for the applicable fiscal year so that funds are available for the project, and a grant for the project must not result in payment of more than the $10 million total amount permissible for all Operation and Maintenance Projects in any fiscal year;
( 3 ) Its plans and specifications for the project must be approved by VA under § 39.82;
( 4 ) The State or Tribal Organization must meet the application requirements in § 39.84; and
( 5 ) Other requirements specified in §§ 39.6, 39.10, and 39.83 must be satisfied.
( b ) VA may approve under § 39.85 any Operation and Maintenance Project grant application up to the amount of the grant requested once the requirements under paragraph (a) of this section have been satisfied, provided that sufficient funds are available, and that total amount of grants awarded during any fiscal year for Operation and Maintenance Projects does not exceed $10 million. In determining whether sufficient funds are available, VA shall consider the project's ranking in Priority Group 4; the total amount of funds available for cemetery grant awards in Priority Group 4 during the applicable fiscal year; and the prospects of higher-ranking projects being ready for the award of a grant before the end of the applicable fiscal year.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4477, Jan. 30, 2012; 87 FR 80461, Dec. 30, 2022]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00348-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-003890-1

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

RYAN W KEPHART AND STEFFANIE KEPHART, Appellants

V.

CHUXIONG DING, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On November 4, 2020, and November 18, 2020, we notified appellants, in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal 

unless they paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellants have

not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellants have not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 10, 2020

1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).