alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 1 **Appendix E:** Parent/Guardian Information L etter and Opt

- out
Dear Parent or Guardian, Your district and school are taking part in a math study conducted by the U.S. Department of Education. The study will be on a 4 th grade math program called Developing Mathematical Ideas (DMI). Schools will either continue their regular program in math or provide DMI to their 4 th grade teachers. Teachers will take part in 24 hours of training in teaching 4 th grade math. They will also do homework and classroom exercises. We want to learn more about effective ways to help teachers teach math. Your child was chosen to be a part of this study because we are including all 4th grade classrooms (where the teacher has decided to join the study). This study will not interrupt your child’s learning and there are no risks of any kind. As part of this study, your child will take a 30

- 40 minute math test. The test will be given in their classroom during the last 6 weeks of school. We will also get your child’s state test scores from last year and information such as age and race. Highly trained staff will give the test. We will schedule testing so that your child does not miss class work. **You can take your child out of the study at any time. Al so, your child does not have to**  **answer any test questions he/she does not want to answer.** Your district and school have decided to make this study a regular part of their program this year. This means that your child will take part in this study unless yo u sign the form below. If you **DO NOT** want your child to be a part of this study, please put your child’s name on the form and sign it. If you have any questions, please email me at (madhavi@inresg.org) or call (714) 826

- 9600. Sincerely, Madhavi Jayanthi, Ph.D. Co

- Principal Investigator

### 2

To Whom It May Concern, I have read the letter. I have received a copy of the project description and hereby request that my child __________________________________ be excluded from the study.

(child’s name) My child attends ______________________________ Elementary School. I understand that my child will still attend their regular classroom as assigned by the school per their policies, in which the teacher has decided to participate in the study. **However my chi ld will not take the mathematics**  **assessment, nor will their school records be accessed for this study.**

Parent/Guardian Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF HOSPITAL STAFFING  SERVICES,  INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED  AUGUST 31, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.  
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                            486,327
<SECURITIES>                                       12,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,218,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                      677,179
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,420,702
<PP&E>                                          2,974,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,122,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,493,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,667,537
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            6,360
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,254,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,493,237
<SALES>                                        15,603,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,603,347
<CGS>                                           9,523,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   9,523,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  183,819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                154,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   159,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                       17,406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               141,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      141,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 254A/14 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 254A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4814 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 254A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4814 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 254A/1 | Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of head of team of duty officers – Communicator; Duty officer – Communicator — Reference: Council/B/023 and Council/B/024 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Council

2005/C 254A/1

Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of head of team of duty officers – Communicator; Duty officer – Communicator — Reference: Council/B/023 and Council/B/024

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0 632 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GREGORY M. SMITH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Dec em

ber 3 0 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 19 2020

11/19/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0632
## Dain Gregory From Sent 

## To Cc Subject

Hi

### Ann Hamilton Gordon 

### Monday December 

### 29 2014 

## 138PM Williams Ann Williamson Timothy Stover Michael Abele Ralph Dain Gregory Weitzler Ellen 

# RE Correction to 

### my last

## message Still need Gordon's help

The South Branch Stream runs through the Penobscot Trust land in

### T2R8NWP 

## ME and is a tributary to the Mattamiscontis Stream Gordon
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    this Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Thor Industries, Inc.
 Date:  November 26, 2007
    /s/ Wade F. B. ThompsonWade F. B. ThompsonChairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer(principal executive officer) 19
41917.

#### REESE v. THE STATE.

Submitted April 5, 1966

Decided April 14, 1966

Rehearing denied April 25, 1966.

*Casey Thigpen,*for appellant.

Deen, Judge.

Knowledge that the goods in question were *526stolen is an essential element of the crime of receiving stolen goods. *Sampson v. State,*60 Ga. App. 512 (4 SE2d 290). It may, however, be inferred from circumstances which would lead a reasonable person to believe that the goods found in his possession were in fact stolen. *Birdsong v. State,*120 Ga. 850 (48 SE 329). In assessing the defendant’s unsworn statement, the jury may believe it in part and disbelieve it in part *(Beatty v. State,*54 Ga. App. 280 (1) (187 SE 686)). The evidence here demanded a finding that the feed which the defendant was hauling in her car was stolen by Nelson. The evidence as to guilty knowledge is circumstantial, but reveals that she was worried about chicken feed being found in her car and that she had protested hauling any *more stuff.*The defense raised was merely that the defendant did not know the stolen grain was in the car, but from all the circumstances of the case, including her statement showing knowledge of prior illegal transactions in which she was involved with her husband and Nelson, indubitably, the jury was at liberty to disbelieve the explanation offered.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40761

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRYAN THOMAS FAULK,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CR-003

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bryan Thomas Faulk appeals the revocation of his supervised

release. Faulk contends that his sentence was imposed in

violation of law because the district court sentenced him to a

term of imprisonment in excess of the applicable range set forth

in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, p.s. "[W]hen a court sentences a defendant

upon revoking his supervised release under [18 U.S.C.] § 3583(e),

the policy statements of Chapter 7 are advisory only." United

States v. Mathena, 23 F.3d 87, 93 (5th Cir. 1994); United States
No. 95-40761

-2-

v. Escamilla, 70 F.3d 835, 835 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied,

1996 WL 106088 (U.S. Apr. 1, 1996) (No. 95-8171).

Faulk contends that the panel's decision in Escamilla is

contrary to prior Supreme Court precedent, the plain language of

the 1994 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3551(a)(4), the legislative

purpose of the Guidelines, and the clear intent of the

legislators. However, as only an "overriding Supreme Court

decision," a change in statutory law, or this court sitting en

banc may overrule a panel decision, Faulk cannot prevail on this

claim. United States v. Zuniga-Salinas, 952 F.2d 876, 877 (5th

Cir. 1992) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Order entered November 1 6 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00893

- CV

MATTHEW FULLER AND FULLER WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC , Appellant s

V.

CRAIG HAUSZ, MICHELLE HAUSZ, CMH ADVISORS, PLLS, AND

CMH WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 01154

- 2022

O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 14, 2022 unopposed motion for a

ten

- day extension of time to file their brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER

the brief be filed no later than November 28, 2022.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

April 24, 2015

 

Stephen Lasota

Address of record at Cowen

 

Dear Steve:

 

This letter amendment (this “Amendment”) sets forth the mutual agreement between you and Cowen Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to amend your employment agreement, dated August 2, 2012 (your “Employment Agreement”).  This Amendment becomes effective when signed by you and the Company.

 

Specifically, your Employment Agreement is amended as follows:

 

·                                          Section 1(bb) is deleted.

 

·                                          Section 4(b) is deleted.

 

This Amendment does not amend any other terms of your Employment Agreement, all of which remain in full force and effect.   You acknowledge that this Amendment does not entitle you to terminate your employment for Good Reason under your Employment Agreement.

 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Peter A. Cohen
    
	
 
    	
Peter A. Cohen
    
	
 
    	
CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signed:
    	
/s/ Stephen Lasota
    	
 
    	
April 24, 2015
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Stephen Lasota
    	
 
    	
Date
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.100 Delegations of authority. ( a ) Authority is delegated to the Under Secretary for Benefits and to supervisory or adjudicative personnel within the jurisdiction of the Veterans Benefits Administration designated by the Under Secretary to make findings and decisions under the applicable laws, regulations, precedents, and instructions, as to entitlement of claimants to benefits under all laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs governing the payment of monetary benefits to veterans and their dependents, within the jurisdiction of the Compensation Service or the Pension and Fiduciary Service.
( b ) Authority is delegated to the Director, Compensation Service, and the Director, Pension and Fiduciary Service, and to personnel of each service designated by its Director to determine whether a claimant or payee has forfeited the right to gratuitious benefits or to remit a prior forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 6103 or 6104. See § 3.905.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512(a))
[29 FR 7547, June 12, 1964, as amended at 31 FR 14455, Nov. 10, 1966; 37 FR 10442, May 23, 1972; 53 FR 3207, Feb. 4, 1988; 60 FR 18355, Apr. 11, 1995; 61 FR 20727, May 8, 1996; 78 FR 2100, Jan. 13, 2014]
### 2/15/2015 Version 1.2 SkyFire Services LLC ====== UAV FIXED WING PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST =======

1. Ensure aircraft assembled properly, Battery is in place but NOT CONNECTED, Check CG, Inspect Airf rame & PITOT Tube for any damage

2. Transmitter on

- *** Ensure CORRECT MODEL SELECTED ***

3. Move Transmitter switches to NEUTRAL / OFF Positions, *** THROTTLE OFF ***

4

. Move aircraft to launch point, Install RF Lost Plane Finder, then Connect Battery to aircraft, Plug in Battery Alarm

. After startup ensure all control surfaces operate in MAN mode. Then test stabilized c ontrol surface movements.

5 . Test RF Lost Plane Finder beacon

6 . Connect Ground Station (GCS) laptop to aircraft and ensure Telemetry feed

7 . Ensure OSD battery reading indicates a full battery.

8 . Ensure GPS 3D lock (> 6 sa tellites).

9 . Cycle through each flight mode using Transmitter switches , ensure GCS reads correctly . *** CAUTION in RETL mode

– spinning Prop

10 . Lost Link Test

– turn off Transmitter and ensure RETL mode is engaged. ** * CAUTION SPINNING PROP ***

11

. Start GCS DVR recorder

12 . Start HD Video Camera on aircraft

13 . Ensure strobes are ON

14. Prepare for Launch

– ensure takeoff into wind.

15. Observer grasps aircraft safely, stretches back bungee until sufficient tension for launch achieved.

16. PIC announces ‘ Launch! ’. When Observer hears this they release aircraft.

17. PIC engages motor once bungee cord drops away from aircraft. Climb to 200’ AGL and engage Loiter.

18. PIC tests RETL/Lost Link

– ensures aircraft engages RETL mode and circles o ver ‘ Home Position ’.

19. PIC announces: ‘ Proceeding with Mission! ’
From: Tom Morrissey [ mailto :tomm@woodstove.com ]

Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:15 PM

To: Wood, Gil

Subject: Data is attached

Hi Gil

Attached is the data you asked for yesterday. The pdf is the fi r st dozen pages of the Polytests test

report, and the spreadsheet is summary data from my files. If there are any discrepancies, it would be

because I prepared my data in a rush before the November Woodstove Challenge in DC.

Our goal with this stove was to produce a relatively flat emissions line , which I think we did pretty well.

On the 3 cordwood tests performed by the lab, emissions were lower on high than on low, but all three

tests were below 1 gm/hr using method 5G3. We have had similar results in our lab, but these three

tests were conducted independently. You can see them on the second tab of my spreadsheet.

The hybrid combustion design is capable of performing very well across a wide range of outputs, with

consistently low emissions. We think we are on ly a couple of iterations away from a “zero emissions”

woodstove (well, not zero, but pretty close).

Let me know if you need anything else. You don’t need to treat this as CBI

.

Tom
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-502 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Fuels 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FRANCE 

Signed at Paris and Ft. Belvoir 

March 6 and May 2, 2006 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FRANCE 

Defense: Fuels 

 Agreement signed at Paris and Ft. Belvoir 

 March 6 and May 2, 2006; 

 Entered into force May 2, 2006. 

 With annexes. 



NOTE: Article III should be "RESPONSIBILITIES"
#### LOVELESS & SON V. JEFFERSON FERTILIZER CO.

(Decided June 11, 1912.)

Appeal from Hale Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Charles E. Waller.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
§ 1007.105 Use of unique identifier. ( a ) The covered financial institution shall make the unique identifier(s) of its registered mortgage loan originator(s) available to consumers in a manner and method practicable to the institution.
( b ) A registered mortgage loan originator shall provide his or her unique identifier to a consumer: ( 1 ) Upon request;
( 2 ) Before acting as a mortgage loan originator; and
( 3 ) Through the originator's initial written communication with a consumer, if any, whether on paper or electronically.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Lesotho

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Lesotho			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho

During the review period, the government did not make its enacted budget proposal or end-of-year report publicly available online within a reasonable amount of time.  Information on debt obligations was not publicly available.  Budget documents provided a mostly complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, including natural resource revenues.  According to budget executive reports and end-of-year reports, actual revenues and expenditures did not reasonably correspond to those in the enacted budget.  Information regarding off-budget accounts and expenditures to support executive offices were not publicly available.  The supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and reviewed the government’s accounts.  However, its audit did not cover the entire annual executed budget and it did not make its reports publicly available within a reasonable period of time.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were specified in law.  The government appeared to follow applicable laws and regulations in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not publicly available. Lesotho’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- timely publishing its enacted budget, executive budget proposal, and end-of-year report online;
- making updated information on debt obligations publicly available;
- ensuring actual revenues and expenditures correspond with those in the enacted budget;
- making expenditures to support executive offices publicly available;
- ensuring off-budget accounts are subject to adequate audit and oversight;
- ensuring audit reports cover the entire annual executed budget;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution publishes its reports within a reasonable period of time; and
- making basic information on natural resource extraction publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Lesotho 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentLesotho

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future