alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    155,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               385,167
<PP&E>                                         420,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,171,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,615
<BONDS>                                        365,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,573
<OTHER-SE>                                     292,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,171,741
<SALES>                                        523,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,729
<CGS>                                          287,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  287,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,471
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vigil Neuroscience, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|                     |  |     |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2022 |  | By: | /s/ Ivana Magovčević-Liebisch        
|                     |  |     | Ivana Magovčević-Liebisch            
|                     |  |     | President and Chief Executive Officer



| |  |  |                              
| |  |  | -----------------------------
| |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)





---
#### § 4.10 Functional impairment.

The basis of disability evaluations is the ability of the body as a whole, or of the psyche, or of a system or organ of the body to function under the ordinary conditions of daily life including employment. Whether the upper or lower extremities, the back or abdominal wall, the eyes or ears, or the cardiovascular, digestive, or other system, or psyche are affected, evaluations are based upon lack of usefulness, of these parts or systems, especially in self-support. This imposes upon the medical examiner the responsibility of furnishing, in addition to the etiological, anatomical, pathological, laboratory and prognostic data required for ordinary medical classification, full description of the effects of disability upon the person's ordinary activity. In this connection, it will be remembered that a person may be too disabled to engage in employment although he or she is up and about and fairly comfortable at home or upon limited activity.

[41 FR 11292, Mar. 18, 1976]
# C_2016034EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7900 — CVC Capital Partners/USS WAY LP/Moto Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 34/01)

On 22 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7900. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7900. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# Official Journal C 48A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.048.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 48A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5326 February 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.048.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 48A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5326 February 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 048A/01 | Vacancy for an Executive Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Asylum Support Office, Malta — COM/2010/10234 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 048A/01

Vacancy for an Executive Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Asylum Support Office, Malta — COM/2010/10234

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The Cosmetic
Center, Inc's June 27, 1998 financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           2,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      787
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2
<INVENTORY>                                     73,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,254
<PP&E>                                          25,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,669
<BONDS>                                         13,255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,687
<SALES>                                         39,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,478
<CGS>                                           37,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,706
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,057)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)
        


</TABLE>
#### Luigi Falanga, Appellant, *v.*Enrico P. Berti, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

*791John Palmieri, for appellant.

John T. Eenlon, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The lease provides that' the deposit is to he made by the parties of the second part. It further provides that Felice La Rocca is made one of the parties of the second part. We think, therefore, she was a necessary party, and the failure to join her warranted a dismissal of the complaint.

The judgment should, therefore, he affirmed, with costs.

Present: Bebkman, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 1.100 Indirect general obligations. ( a ) *Obligation issued by an obligor not possessing general powers of taxation.* Pursuant to § 1.2(b), an obligation issued by an obligor not possessing general powers of taxation qualifies as a general obligation of a State or political subdivision for the purposes of 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh), if a party possessing general powers of taxation unconditionally promises to make sufficient funds available for all required payments in connection with the obligation.
( b ) *Indirect commitment of full faith and credit.* The indirect commitment of the full faith and credit of a State or political subdivision (that possesses general powers of taxation) in support of an obligation may be demonstrated by any of the following methods, alone or in combination, when the State or political subdivision pledges its full faith and credit in support of the obligation. ( 1 ) *Lease/rental agreement.* The lease agreement must be valid and binding on the State or the political subdivision, and the State or political subdivision must unconditionally promise to pay rentals that, together with any other available funds, are sufficient for the timely payment of interest on, and principal of, the obligation. These lease/rental agreement may, for instance, provide support for obligations financing the acquisition or operation of public projects in the areas of education, medical care, transportation, recreation, public buildings, and facilities.
( 2 ) *Service/purchase agreement.* The agreement must be valid and binding on the State or the political subdivision, and the State or political subdivision must unconditionally promise in the agreement to make payments for services or resources provided through or by the issuer of the obligation. These payments, together with any other available funds, must be sufficient for the timely payment of interest on, and principal of, the obligation. An agreement to purchase municipal sewer, water, waste disposal, or electric services may, for instance, provide support for obligations financing the construction or acquisition of facilities supplying those services.
( 3 ) *Refillable debt service reserve fund.* The reserve fund must at least equal the amount necessary to meet the annual payment of interest on, and principal of, the obligation as required by applicable law. The maintenance of a refillable reserve fund may be provided, for instance, by statutory direction for an appropriation, or by statutory automatic apportionment and payment from the State funds of amounts necessary to restore the fund to the required level.
( 4 ) *Other grants or support.* A statutory provision or agreement must unconditionally commit the State or the political subdivision to provide funds which, together with other available funds, are sufficient for the timely payment of interest on, and principal of, the obligation. Those funds may, for instance, be supplied in the form of annual grants or may be advanced whenever the other available revenues are not sufficient for the payment of principal and interest.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| */s/Ben-Tsur              Joseph *                                                                                             |   |   |        |
| Ben-Tsur                JosephChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:                November 14, 2006  |   |   |        |

----
#### § 6.15 Cash value; special endowment at age 96 plan policy.

Provisions for cash value shall become effective at the completion of the first policy year; all values and net single premiums are as prescribed by the Secretary and published in VA Pamphlet 90-2A. The cash value at the end of the first policy year and at the end of any policy year thereafter shall be the reserve as set forth in the policy together with any dividend accumulations. For each month after the first policy year the reserve at the end of the preceding policy year shall be increased by one-twelfth of the increase in reserve for the current policy year. Upon written request therefor and upon complete surrender of the insurance with all claims thereunder made by the insured, the United States will pay to the insured the cash value of the policy less any indebtedness, provided the policy has been in force for at least 1 year. Unless otherwise requested by the insured, a surrender will be deemed completed as of the end of the month in which the application for cash surrender is delivered to the Department of Veterans Affairs, or as of the date of the check for the cash value, whichever is later. If the application is forwarded by mail, properly addressed, the postmark date will be taken as the date of delivery. If it is forwarded through military channels, the date the application is placed in military channels will be taken as the date of delivery.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1944)

[48 FR 1963, Jan. 17, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
§ 59.124 Inspections, audits, and reports. ( a ) A State will allow VA inspectors and auditors to conduct inspections and audits as necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this part. The State will provide evidence that it has met its responsibility under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards under 2 CFR part 200 and submit that evidence to VA.
( b ) A State will make such reports in such form and containing such information as the Chief Consultant, Geriatrics and Extended Care, may from time to time reasonably require and give the Chief Consultant, Geriatrics and Extended Care, upon demand, access to the records upon which such information is based.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)
[66 FR 33847, June 26, 2001, as amended at 80 FR 43323, July 22, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of Steele Creek Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Applegate Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |       | /s/ Douglas Applegate Jr.
| | ----- | -------------------------
| | Name: | Douglas Applegate Jr.    
| | Date: | March 31, 2022
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the    “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Robert F.X. Sillerman,    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the    Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,    as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.      By: /s/  Robert    F. X. Sillerman    Robert F. X. Sillerman*Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board**(Principal Executive Officer)*     Dated: August 14, 2007
### SERVED: June 17,2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFJCE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MA TIEROF 

### CHEMSYSTEMS, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0911 

### POSTPONEMENT OF HEARING ·r**·.·qT~'E.NT** 

## OF**i,~j·,** .. Ill

- -. 'I
.

## "'f

## ORTA""IO' ! 

### :··,,.1'!) J 

### I t';

### ~.

## J<Ef

## OPERATIONS

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Agency") has filed a Motion for Continuance ofthe matter currently set for June 23, 24, 25 and 26, 2014, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 7006, Casey U.S. Courthouse, 515 RuskAvenue, Houston, TX 77002. ChemSystems, Inc., (hereafter "Respondent") has yet to file a response. This is the second continuance ofthis matter. The matter will be continued and reset after September 1, 2014. There will be no further continuances ofthis case.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachments

- Service ListSERVICE LISTBY US. MAIL & FAX
ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001
Nancy Meikle, President ChemSystems, Inc., Respondent 1

0101 Genard Road Houston, TX 77041 Robert Fling, Respondent's Counsel 

## .s. Robert Fling, PLLC. P.O. Box 411, Katy, TX 77492 5518 Fifth Street, Suite C Katy, TX 77493 TEL: 281-391-2003 FAX: 281-727-0082 ONE COPY

Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office oftheRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0911 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2

## .. The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536
.

3
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.710 Civil service annuitants.

Department of Veterans Affairs benefits may be paid concurrently with civil service retirement benefits. However, payments will be considered income as provided in § 3.262 (e) and (h).

[29 FR 15208, Nov. 11, 1964]