alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1744

JENNEBAH S. VILLE, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. UNITED AIR LINES, INCORPORATED, Dulles Airport Virginia, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00900-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennebah S. Ville, Appellant Pro Se. Eric J. Janson, Michael Andrew Viccora, SEYFARTH & SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jennebah S. Ville appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant, and dismissing with prejudice Ville’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e)-(e)17 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ville v. United Air Lines, Inc. , No. 1:07-00900-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. filed June 23, 2008; entered June 24, 2008). We deny Ville’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 6.2 Premium rate.

Effective January 1, 1983, United States Government Life Insurance policies, and total disability income provisions, on a premium paying status are paid-up and no premiums are required to maintain such policies and provisions in force.

[48 FR 1960, Jan. 17, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29024, 29025, June 7, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                          158
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 4,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    (45)
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                           53
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (38)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                4,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,597
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                        587
<OTHER-SE>                                                    1,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  4,128
<SALES>                                                         547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                547
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 217
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    260
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.22



</TABLE>
#### Lewis A. Miller, Respondent, *v.*William Hartman, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Kew York, third district, borough of Manhattan.

Herbert F. Andrews, for appellant.

Joseph M. Williams, for respondent.

*Per CuHam.*

There is no evidence that at the time of the making of the check the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in the bank upon which it was drawn. The judgment mnst, therefore, be reversed.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ. •

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
### -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0 39.5 40.0



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### § 74.29 When will VA dispose of records?

The records, including those pertaining to businesses not determined to be eligible for the program, will be kept intact and in good condition and retained in accordance with VA records management procedures following a program examination or the date of the last Notice of Verified Status Approval letter. Longer retention will not be required unless a written request is received from the Government Accountability Office not later than 30 days prior to the end of the retention period.

[83 FR 48232, Sept. 24, 2018]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Glossary [electronic resource]: defense acquisition acronyms and terms.**
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.127:

Item Number:0307-A-69 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000797803
 
11th| 12th | 13th | 14th | 15th
 
April 2, 2020
# CE2004065EN.01026401.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/264 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/264

---

(2004/C 65 E/278)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3047/03

by Elspeth Attwooll (ELDR), Heinz Kindermann (PSE), John McCartin (PPE-DE) and Willi Görlach (PSE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   Recreational fisheries and tourism statistics

Subject:

The Commission and Council are aware that there is a need to improve the common statistical base on tourism. A common platform of know-how is a precondition for benchmarking, for change of views, for learning and for addressing strategic problems in the tourism sector. Also that there is a need to develop statistically valid and comparable data on tourism. A common goal is to initiate the implementation of national Tourism Satellite Accounts (TSA) in the Member States. Recreational fisheries (angling tourism) are a significant part of the European tourism sector.

Will the Commission make sure that recreational fisheries are measured and their figures mentioned in their own right within the overall frame for tourism statistics?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

(18 November 2003)

The Commission would like to draw the attention to the usefulness of the existing statistical legislation (Directive 95/57/EC) (1) for the production of internationally comparable statistics in the field of tourism. Its implementation in the Member States has led to constant progress in the availability of valid and comparable data on tourism. This data is published regularly by the Commission. As regards the Acceding Countries, major progress has been made, so that they can provide the same level of information as the present Member States at the moment when they will be joining the Union on 1 May 2004.

1

In the above-mentioned Directive, many breakdowns of the data are already requested, such as breakdowns by nationality, by length of stay or by principal mode of transport. No breakdown is requested concerning the type of holidays. As a result, it is not possible to distinguish recreational fisheries (or any other type of holiday) in the tourism statistics. In order to limit response burden, an introduction of additional breakdowns is not foreseen.

---

(1)  Council Directive 95/57/EC of 23 November 1995 on the collection of statistical information in the field of tourism, OJ L 291, 6.12.1995.

1

---
PPtitinnPrBrian J. (BJ) McCall 17196 Woodforest Drive Waller,Tx 77484 832-755-5325 bimac7l@gmail.com
In this Petition for Exemption, Brian J. (BJ) McCall is hereafter referred to as the Operator.
Scope: Acquire photos and video for real estate listings, using the DJI Phantom 3 Professional Unmanned Aerial System.

UAV Phantom 3 Professional: The DJI Phantom 3 Professional is a quad-rotor Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) weighing less than 3 pounds. The UAS features a safety Return to Home function that in the event of a signal loss, the UAS will return to a preset position and land. The Return to Home feature can also be triggered manually. The remote connects to your phone or tablet, and a 720p HD view of everything your camera sees as you fly is displayed in real time. From takeoff to landing, the Phantom 3 responds to commands while automatically handling the most complex aspects of safe, stable flight.
Request: An exemption from 91.7(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2) and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) as was granted to:
Donald Collins Jr. Exemption No.13989 Ralph J. Apel Exemption No. 11410 Douglas Trudeau,Realtor Exemption No.11138

Petition: I request an exemption from TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113 (a) and (b); 91.7 (a); 91.119 (c); 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (1) and (2); 91.417(a) and (b)
#### Jimmy D. CARTY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig NELSON, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-56766.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005.

Filed Oct. 17, 2005.

Amended Dec. 15, 2005.

Matthew D. Brown, CJA, San Francisco, CA (argued); Christopher R.J. Pace, Cooley Goodward LLP, San Diego, CA (briefed), for the petitioner-appellant.

*1186Bradley A. Weinreb, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for the respondents-appellees.

Before PREGERSON, FISHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

At slip op. 14213, change “the San Diego County District Attorney contends” to “the State contends.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en bane, and the panel voted to deny the Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petitions filed by both parties for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-083)]


NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Earth Science 
Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Earth Science Subcommittee of the NASA 
Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science 
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of 
soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific 
and technical information relevant to program planning.

DATES: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Thursday, 
October 15, 2009, 8 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, 
DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, 
fax (202) 358-4118, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#325f5c5d40405b41725c5341531c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc0c3c2dfdfc4deedc3ccdecc83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Earth Science Division Update;
--Decadal Survey Status Update;
--Data and Information Systems Status and Long-Term Plans.
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. 
Attendees will be requested to sign a register.

    Dated: September 22, 2009.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-23340 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Aaron L. Jaffe, Respondent, *v.*The Bowery Bank, Appellant.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

James E. Pearsall, for appellant.

Louis Cohen, for respondent.

*Per Guriam.*

The evidence before the Trial Court was sufficient to support the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. It was shown that one Sol Moses was doing business under the name of Moses Brothers; that he opened an account with the defendant in the latter name, and that at the time of the execution of the assignment below mentioned there was a balance standing to the credit of said account. On the 23d day of December, 1899, Sol Moses made, executed and delivered to the plaintiff an assignment in which, after describing himself as “trading under the name of Moses Brothers,” he assigns to the plaintiff “ .all the moneys now on deposit standing to my credit in the Bowery Bank, in the borough of Manhattan, City, County and State of Hew York. ” The assignment further contained a power “ to sign, execute and acknowledge any and all checks, receipts or other, instruments in writing which the said Bowery Bank shall require for the purpose of paying over and delivering to the said Aaron L. Jaffe the said sums of money hereby assigned.” It also appeared that the assignor had no other account with the defendant bank than the one above mentioned. There can be no doubt that the assignment, construed in the light of the surrounding circuim stances, was intended to and did transfer to the plaintiff the moneys which were on deposit with the defendant to the credit of “ Moses Brothers.” Sol Moses and he alone was the depositor under a description adopted by him for trading purposes, as he himself states in the assignment in question, and as is also shown by the proofs. Moneys then on deposit with the defendant in terms credited to Moses Brother’s were in legal effect moneys standing to his credit. He was the creditor of the bank, and the latter was debtor to him. The plaintiff having thus acquired title to the moneys in question presented his assignment to the bank and demanded payment, which was refused, whereupon this action was *779brought for the recovery of the debt. Upon the facts as proven, and necessarily found by the justice in rendering judgment for the plaintiff, we are clearly of the opinion that the plaintiff had a complete cause of action against the bank upon its refusal to pay the money to him. The cause of action was not of an equitable character and the action was properly brought as one at law.

The judgment was right and should be affirmed.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegebich and O’Goemaw, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 48.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the Department of Veterans Affairs; or

(2) A(n) Department of Veterans Affairs awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 48.605 and 48.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) Department of Veterans Affairs awarding official | A, D and E. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            2977
<SECURITIES>                                      9367
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4184
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (238)
<INVENTORY>                                       9659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27406
<PP&E>                                           13992
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8765)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         24194
<OTHER-SE>                                        5067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33624
<SALES>                                           3379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3379
<CGS>                                             2155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (682)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)
        

</TABLE>
|  Date: November 3, 2010 |   |                                            |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                            |   |
|                         |   | /s/ Steve G. Rogers                        |   |
|                         |   | Steven G. Rogers (*)                            |   |
|                         |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |
|                         |   |                                            |   |

| * | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 40.2 Definitions. For the purposes of §§ 40.1 through 40.13, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *VA* means the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) *Order* means Executive Order 12372, issued July 14, 1982, and amended April 8, 1983, and titled “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.”
( c ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of the Department of Veterans Affairs or an official or employee of VA acting for the Secretary under delegation of authority.
( d ) *State* means any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
( e ) *Emergency* means a sudden, urgent, unforeseen situation in which immediate action is needed to prevent or respond to significant harm to life or property. Harm to property would include damage to the environment.
( f ) *Unusual circumstances* means the end of a fiscal year, a statutory deadline or any other circumstance making it impracticable for the agency to provide 60 days for comment.
( g ) *Affected* means for purposes of interstate situations those States physically affected by the specific plans and projects.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))