alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

 

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock and CommonStock Equivalents

*($ and shares in thousands, except per sharedata)*

 
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **March 31,**               | ** ** |
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **2006**                         | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | ** **                       | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| Net income applicable to common stock                               |       | $                                | 15,525     |   | $ | 9,699 |   |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Average number of common shares outstanding                         |       | 16,639                           |       | 12,677 |   |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Net income per share - Basic                                        |       | $                                | 0.93       |   | $ | 0.77 |   |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Average number of common shares outstanding                         |       | 16,639                           |       | 12,677 |   |
| Add: Assumed exercise of stock options and  vesting of stock grants |       | 118                              |       | 83 |   |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Common and common equivalent shares  outstanding                    |       | 16,757                           |       | 12,760 |   |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Net income per share - Diluted                                      |       | $                                | 0.93       |   | $ | 0.76 |   |

 

1

----
#### STATE OF ALASKA, Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of the State of Alaska, and Commissioner of the Department of Revenue, Appellants, v. K *&*L DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Washington Corporation, Appellee.

No. 17183.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 17, 1963.

Ralph E. Moody, Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, Gary Thurlow, Deputy Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, John E. Havelock, Asst. Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska, for appellants.

Franco & Bensussen, Albert M. Franco, Seattle, Wash., McNealy, Merdes & Camarot, Robert J. McNealy, Fairbanks, Alaska, and Peter J. Kalmarides, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

The judgment herein of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, the constitutional court established on or about February 20, 1960, after the termination of the life of the interim court (manned by federal personnel) which functioned in the state after statehood, is vacated.

No federal question is involved and diversity of citizenship was erroneously assumed to exist, but this cannot be because domestic states of the Union have never been regarded as citizens.

The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. It may be assumed that a court always has jurisdiction to keep house and control of its records. The parties appear to be agreeable that the district court transfer the case to the Superior Court for the State of Alaska. If the district court should choose to transfer the case to the state judicial system, questions of jurisdiction, if any, would be for the state side of the street and not the federal in view of the posture of the case.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4311 Prepayment.

The debtor shall have the right to prepay at any time, without premium or fee, the entire indebtedness or any part thereof not less than the amount of one installment, or $100, whichever is less. Any prepayment in full of the indebtedness shall be credited on the date received, and no interest may be charged thereafter. Any partial prepayment made on other than an installment due date need not be credited until the next following installment due date or 30 days after such prepayment, whichever is earlier. The holder and the debtor may agree at any time that any prepayment not previously applied in satisfaction of matured installments shall be reapplied for the purpose of curing or preventing any subsequent default.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(d))
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00386

- CR

Deshawn Ondrey WILLIAMS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 360545

Honorable Phil Chavarria Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we MODIFY the judgment and bill of

costs to delete Williams’s requirement to pay attorney’s fees. The trial court’s judgm ent is

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SIGNED April 16, 2014.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/Afor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert F.X.Sillerman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

**Dated:  March 13, 2006**

|        |   | By:    |   | /s/ ROBERT  F. X. SILLERMAN                         |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Robert F. X. Sillerman                              |
|   |   |   |   | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board* |
|   |   |   |   | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                     |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB/Apursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 34.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the shareholder and Board of Directors of

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

Milwaukee, Wisconsin



We have examined management's assertion for Wisconsin Electric Power
Company and subsidiary (the “Company”) regarding compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB (“Regulation AB”) for the Environmental Trust Bonds Series 2021
(the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, excluding criteria items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii),
1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. The Company’s management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company
performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each item
included in the Platform. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about management’s assertion. The nature,
timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of
management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with
the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.



| | /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP | 
| | ------------------------- | 
| |                           | 
| | Milwaukee, Wisconsin      | 
| | March 11, 2022            |
# Official Journal C 107/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 107 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 605 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 107

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 605 April 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 107/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8308 — Munksjö/Ahlstrom II) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 107/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8308 — Munksjö/Ahlstrom II) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 107/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 107/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 107/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8385 — Pillarstone/Famar) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2017/C 107/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8434 — Emil Frey France/PGA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 107/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8385 — Pillarstone/Famar) (
  1
  )

1

3

2017/C 107/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8434 — Emil Frey France/PGA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2017/C 107/05 | Corrigendum to the Notice 2017/C 62/07 ( OJ C 62, 25.2.2017 ) | 5 |

Corrigenda

2017/C 107/05

Corrigendum to the Notice 2017/C 62/07 ( OJ C 62, 25.2.2017 )

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### *Benjamin Springer *against*John Reeves.

ON CERTIORARI.

CHAPMAN and *Woodruff*for plaintiff. *Armstrong*for defendant. *White*and

The jury rendered a special verdict. (a)

(a)

 See *Paterson Gas Co. vs. Brady, 3 Dutch. 250. Nix. Dig. 452*§ *35.*

Opinion of the Court.

Southard J.

At the trial of this cause before the justice, the jury rendered a special verdict, in strict legal form, and this is now the only objection made to the legality of the judgment, it being insisted by the counsel for the plaintiff in *certiorari,*that in the court for the trial of small causes, no such verdict can be received; and in support of this doctrine, reliance was had upon *Pen. on Small Causes*177-8, and *Griffith’s Treatise,*121-2. The former of these writers, when speaking of verdicts in this court, says, “ The verdict should always be positive and general, and not conditional or special;” the latter, that “ a conditional verdict or a special one, or one in the form of an award, would be erroneous.” Great respect is certainly due to the opinions which shall be entertained by those gentlemen, and nothing short of that respect, would have created, in my mind, a doubt worthy of investigation. I am persuaded, however, that their opinion, however correct as to other verdicts, is, as to special ones, hasty and inaccurate. The right of juries to find special verdicts has existed in *England,*since the passage of the statute of *West.*2nd 18 *Ed.*1 *cap.*30, sec. 2; and in this state, since the first establishment of our juridical system. The express words of our statute, *Pat.*261, sec. 17. “ that *no jury*shall, in any case, be compelled to give *236a general verdict, so that they find a special verdict and ■shew the truth of the fact, and require the aid of the court,” &c. preclude all question on the subject at this day. This section, in its terms, comprehends juries sworn in the court for the trial of small causes, as well as those sworn in any other court. And no sound reason can be given why it should not apply to them. Questions of legal difficulty often arise there, which the jurors ought not to be compelled to decide. They need the aid of the court in expounding the law, and the *duty of expounding it presses as strongly upon that court, as those of a higher jurisdiction.

The court think, therefore, that the jury did right in finding a special verdict in this cause; that the court judged correctly in all respects, upon the finding; and that the judgment ought to be *affirmed.*

Judgment affirmed.
!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 

425677-8
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3!

425679:;
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3"

42567<9=
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3#

4256>7? =
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3$

4256& $!
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3%

4256&@A ;
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3&

4256&&-7
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3'

4256B794
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3(

4256B->C
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 )

4256D=98
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3  

4256E? =F
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 !

4256<-GF
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 "

4256F7? :
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 #

4256F7-H
 

!"#$&'()* + ,-./012' 3,3! 3 $

4256F<9@
<PAGE>
 
                 KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                     (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                            For the Thirteen Weeks Ended     For the Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                   June 27, 1998                      June 28, 1997
                                           ------------------------------    ------------------------------
                                                                Per-Share                         Per-Share
                                           Income     Shares     Amount      Income     Shares     Amount
                                           -------    ------    ---------    ------     ------    ---------
<S>                                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>       <C> 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings                               $ 4,108    27,213     $  0.15    $ 8,775     26,257    $  0.33
                                                                 =======                          =======
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Excess of shares issuable upon
  exercise of stock options over
  shares deemed retired utilizing
  the treasury stock method                      -       699                      -      1,505  
                                           -------    ------                -------     ------
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings plus assumed conversions      $ 4,108    27,912     $  0.15    $ 8,775     27,762    $  0.32
                                           =======    ======     =======    =======     ======    ======= 
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officers of FCCC,
Inc. hereby certify that (a) FCCC. Incs Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Quarterly
Report) and the Quarterly Report, as amended, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
FCCC, Inc.

|Date: February 4, 2009 | 
|---------------------- | 
|                       | 

| | Bernard Zimmerman                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | President, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer

---
#### § 77.7 Withdrawal of grant application.

An applicant may withdraw its application by submitting to VA a written document that withdraws the application.
§ 71.50 Provision of certain counseling, training, and mental health services to certain family members of veterans. ( a ) *Benefits provided under this section.* VA will provide consultation, professional counseling, marriage and family counseling, training, and mental health services to a family member when necessary in connection with the treatment of a disability for which the veteran is receiving treatment through VA. For the purposes of this section, provision of a benefit is “in connection with the treatment” of a veteran's disability if, in the clinical judgment of a VA medical professional who is providing treatment to the veteran, the provision of the benefit to the family member would further the objectives of the veteran's medical treatment plan. The listed benefits provided under this section are to be provided within the following guidelines: ( 1 ) All benefits will consist of psychotherapy, counseling, training, or education; VA will not provide prescriptions or medications to family members. VA also will not provide inpatient services under this section.
( 2 ) This section does not authorize the provision of clinical evaluation or treatment that is not necessary in connection with the veteran's treatment or that involves treatment other than consultation, professional counseling, marriage and family counseling, training, and mental health services.
( 3 ) Marriage and family counseling includes services to help the veteran address mental health issues, manage physical health problems, and strengthen environmental supports as specified in the veteran's treatment plan. It also includes interventions to reduce the negative impact for the veteran of mental illnesses or other medical conditions in family members.
( b ) *Definition of family member.* For the purpose of this section, which provides certain benefits and services to eligible family members, a family member is: ( 1 ) A person related to the veteran by birth or marriage who lives with the veteran or has regular personal contact with the veteran;
( 2 ) The veteran's legal guardian or surrogate;
( 3 ) A Primary or Secondary Family Caregiver or a General Caregiver; or
( 4 ) The individual in whose household the veteran has certified an intention to live.
( c ) *Family members or caregivers who need treatment not related to the treatment of the veteran.* Where a VA clinician believes that medical care or services are needed for a family member but cannot provide benefits under this section because such need is not necessary in connection with the treatment of the veteran, VA may refer such family member to an appropriate provider in the community, so that the family member may obtain care through other health coverage including care to which a Primary or Secondary Family Caregiver may be eligible under this part.
[76 FR 26172, May 5, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 46300, July 31, 2020]