alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.55 Principles of combined ratings for muscle injuries. ( a ) A muscle injury rating will not be combined with a peripheral nerve paralysis rating of the same body part, unless the injuries affect entirely different functions.
( b ) For rating purposes, the skeletal muscles of the body are divided into 23 muscle groups in 5 anatomical regions: 6 muscle groups for the shoulder girdle and arm (diagnostic codes 5301 through 5306); 3 muscle groups for the forearm and hand (diagnostic codes 5307 through 5309); 3 muscle groups for the foot and leg (diagnostic codes 5310 through 5312); 6 muscle groups for the pelvic girdle and thigh (diagnostic codes 5313 through 5318); and 5 muscle groups for the torso and neck (diagnostic codes 5319 through 5323).
( c ) There will be no rating assigned for muscle groups which act upon an ankylosed joint, with the following exceptions: ( 1 ) In the case of an ankylosed knee, if muscle group XIII is disabled, it will be rated, but at the next lower level than that which would otherwise be assigned.
( 2 ) In the case of an ankylosed shoulder, if muscle groups I and II are severely disabled, the evaluation of the shoulder joint under diagnostic code 5200 will be elevated to the level for unfavorable ankylosis, if not already assigned, but the muscle groups themselves will not be rated.
( d ) The combined evaluation of muscle groups acting upon a single unankylosed joint must be lower than the evaluation for unfavorable ankylosis of that joint, except in the case of muscle groups I and II acting upon the shoulder.
( e ) For compensable muscle group injuries which are in the same anatomical region but do not act on the same joint, the evaluation for the most severely injured muscle group will be increased by one level and used as the combined evaluation for the affected muscle groups.
( f ) For muscle group injuries in different anatomical regions which do not act upon ankylosed joints, each muscle group injury shall be separately rated and the ratings combined under the provisions of § 4.25.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)
[62 FR 30237, June 3, 1997]
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000579 29-MAR-2018 10:32 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2239 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2239

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
  vocational rehabilitation benefits administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2007

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
  vocational rehabilitation benefits administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Early Access to Vocational 
Rehabilitation and Employment Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION BENEFITS 
              ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 3102 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) the person--
                    ``(A) at the time of the Secretary's determination 
                under subparagraph (B), is a member of the Armed Forces 
                who is hospitalized or receiving outpatient medical 
                care, services, or treatment;
                    ``(B) is determined by the Secretary to have a 
                total disability permanent in nature incurred or 
                aggravated in the line of duty in the active military, 
                naval, or air service; and
                    ``(C) is likely to be discharged or released from 
                such service for such disability.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|Date: November 11, 2002 |  | /s/GERARD E. PUORRO                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                        |  | Gerard E. Puorro
Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
#### § 80.17 Non-appealability of grant award decisions.

Grant award decisions are discretionary and are not subject to appeal to any VA official or board.
# Official Journal L 233/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 233 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 609 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 233

English edition

Legislation

Volume 609 September 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1533 of 8 September 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1165 as regards the temporary exceptional support measures for producers of peaches and nectarines in Greece, Spain and Italy | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/1534 of 31 August 2017 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 (EUNAVFOR MED/2/2017) | 4 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/1535 of 4 September 2017 adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1533 of 8 September 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1165 as regards the temporary exceptional support measures for producers of peaches and nectarines in Greece, Spain and Italy

1

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/1534 of 31 August 2017 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2017/681 (EUNAVFOR MED/2/2017)

4

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/1535 of 4 September 2017 adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50624

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Roxanne Ojeda, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-628-11

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roxanne Ojeda

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ojeda has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50624 Document: 00515919875 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2021
No. 20-50624

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-50624 Document: 00515919875 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2021
From: "Lorenzen, Thomas (ENRD)" <Thomas.Lorenzen@usdoj.gov>

To: Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Elliott Zenick/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Miller, Wendy (ENRD)" <Wendy.Miller@usdoj.gov>

Date: 02/03/2012 12:00 PM

Subject: RE: Tom, can we speak to you at 2:00 today?

Howard,

Got your voicemail. I don't think I can talk with you about transitional sources 

outside the inter-agency process at this point, absent some clearance which you'd 

probably have to seek. I'd probably also have to include Wendy Miller from LPS 

on any such call, assuming clearance is obtained.

Tom

-----Original Message-----

From: Howard Hoffman [mailto:hoffman.howard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:18 AM

To: Lorenzen, Thomas (ENRD)

Cc: Elliott Zenick

Subject: Tom, can we speak to you at 2:00 today?

Elliott and me, and possibly Patricia.

Howard J. Hoffman EPA-OGC-ARLO

(202) 564-5582 (v); -5603 (fax); (240) 401-9721 (cell)

The contents of this e-mail and any attachments to it

may be attorney-client or deliberative-process privileged.

From: "Lorenzen, Thomas (ENRD)" <Thomas.Lorenzen@usdoj.gov>

To: Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Rosen, Perry (ENRD)"

 <Perry.Rosen@usdoj.gov>

Date: 01/18/2012 10:28 AM

Subject: Re: Quick question: Could the DC Circuit issue a partial

 stay of a rule, that is, stay just a particular issue in a

 rule, or does the DC Circuit either stay the entire rule or

 dismis the stay petition? Thx. nm

I've not seen them do that, but it would seem to be within their

equitable power to fashion relief that is as narrow as possible,

assuming they find the rule can be severed in that way.

Sent Using U.S. DOJ/ENRD BES 5 Server

From: Howard Hoffman [mailto:hoffman.howard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:13 AM

To: Lorenzen, Thomas (ENRD); Rosen, Perry (ENRD)

Subject: Quick question: Could the DC Circuit issue a partial stay of a

rule, that is, stay just a particular issue in a rule, or does the DC

Circuit either stay the entire rule or dismis the stay petition? Thx. nm

Howard J. Hoffman EPA-OGC-ARLO

(202) 564-5582 (v); -5603 (fax); (240) 401-9721 (cell)
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments to it

may be attorney-client or deliberative-process privileged.
# L_2004170EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

A special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union containing the texts of the Acts of the institutions and of the European Central Bank adopted before accession will be published in the Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene languages. The volumes of this edition will be issued gradually between 1 May and the end of 2004.

Official Journal of the European Union

Pending publication, the electronic version of the texts is available on EUR-Lex.

The EUR-Lex site is at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/accession.html

---
#### § 17.505 Disclosure authorities.

The VA medical facility Director, Regional Director, Under Secretary for Health, or their designees are authorized to disclose any confidential and privileged quality assurance records or documents under their control to other agencies, organizations, or individuals where 38 U.S.C. 5705 or the regulations in §§ 17.500 through 17.511 expressly provide for disclosure.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5705)
§ 75.118 Other credit protection services. ( a ) With respect to individuals found under this subpart by the Secretary to be subject to a reasonable risk for the potential misuse of any sensitive personal information under this subpart, the Secretary may offer one or more of the following as warranted based on considerations specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) One year of credit monitoring services consisting of automatic daily monitoring of at least 3 relevant credit bureau reports;
( 2 ) Data breach analysis;
( 3 ) Fraud resolution services, including writing dispute letters, initiating fraud alerts and credit freezes, to assist affected individuals to bring matters to resolution; and/or
( 4 ) One year of identity theft insurance with $20,000.00 coverage at $0 deductible.
( b ) Consistent with the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*) as interpreted and applied by the Federal Trade Commission, the notice to the individual offering other credit protection services will explain how the individual may obtain the services, including the information required to be submitted by the individual to obtain the services, and the time period within which the individual must act to take advantage of the credit protection services offered.
( c ) In determining whether any or all of the credit protection services specified in paragraph (a) of this section will be offered to individuals subject to a data breach, the Secretary will consider the following: ( 1 ) The data elements involved;
( 2 ) The number of individuals affected or potentially affected;
( 3 ) The likelihood the sensitive personal information will be or has been made accessible to and usable by unauthorized persons;
( 4 ) The risk of potential harm to the affected individuals; and
( 5 ) The ability to mitigate the risk of harm.
( c ) The Secretary will take action to obtain data mining and data breach analyses services, as appropriate, to obtain information relevant for making determinations under this subpart.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5724, 5727)
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4222 Hazard insurance. ( a ) The holder shall require insurance policies to be procured and maintained in an amount sufficient to protect the security against risks or hazards to which it may be subjected to the extent customary in the locality. The costs of such required insurance coverage may be paid for by the veteran. Only the costs for one year may be included in the loan amount. ( 1 ) Flood insurance will be required on any manufactured home, building or personal property securing a loan at any time during the term of the loan that such security is located in an area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as having special flood hazards and in which flood insurance has been made available under the National Flood Insurance Act, as amended. The amount of flood insurance must be at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the loan or the maximum limit of coverage available for the particular type of property under the National Flood Insurance Act, as amended. The Secretary cannot guarantee a loan for the acquisition or construction of property located in an area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as having special flood hazards unless the community in which such area is situated is then participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4106(a))
( 2 ) Broad Lender's Protection Insurance or its equivalent is required to protect against loss for any items missing from the manufactured home at time of repossession and to cover repossession expenses including, but not limited to, breakdown and transport charges, permit and export fees, and an amount, limited by the Secretary, of unpaid park rent.
( b ) All monies under such policies covering payment of insured losses shall be applied to restoration of the security or to the loan balance.
[58 FR 37859, July 14, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 5531, Feb. 6, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                        1,803,279
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,803,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,588,846
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    214,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,803,279
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              25,159
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              115,379
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (90,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (90,220)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (90,220)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (2.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (2.76)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:   May 12, 2004

/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 09-047. Applicant: Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 44350, August 28, 2009.

Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: The foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of this instrument.

Dated: September 22, 2009.

Christopher D. Cassel,

Director.

Subsidies Enforcement Office.

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-23384 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00428-CV

Charlie Ray Taylor, Appellant

v.

State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-07-001046, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Charlie Ray Taylor has filed an affidavit of indigence and a request for the preparation

of the court reporter’srecord without advance payment of costs. We have forwarded these pleadings

to the trial court.

We hereby abate this appeal so that the trial court may consider the affidavit of

indigence and Taylor’s request to have the record prepared without advance payment of costs under

both Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 and Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code

Annotated section 13.003 (West 2002).

The deadline for filing contests to the affidavit of indigence is October 13, 2008.

The remaining deadlines will conform to the procedures outlined in Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 20.1.
2

This appeal will be reinstated when this Court receives a supplemental clerk’s record

containing any documents relevant to any contest to the affidavit as well as the trial court’s ruling

on the affidavit and whether Taylor is entitled to a free reporter’s record. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &

Rem. Code Ann. § 13.003; Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Abated

Filed: October 1, 2008
#### § 39.85 Final review and approval of application.

Following VA approval of bid tabulations and cost estimates, the complete Operation and Maintenance Project grant application will be reviewed for approval in accordance with the requirements of § 39.80. If the application is approved, the grant will be awarded by a Memorandum of Agreement of Federal grant funds.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)