40968 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP 

Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic 

or nonattainment area 

State submittal/ 

effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Infrastructure for 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS.

Statewide, except for 

Bernalillo County and 

Indian country.

6/12/2009 7/9/2013 [Insert FR page number where document begins].1/22/2013, (78 FR 4337): 

Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), 

(B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (PSD 

portion), (D)(ii), (E), (F), 

(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and 

(M). 7/9/2013, ([Insert FR 

page number where document begins]): Approval 

for 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–16345 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0190; FRL–9830–8] 

Notice of Extension of Deadline to 

Commence Construction Under Clean 

Air Act Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Permit Issued to Avenal 

Power Center, LLC 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final action. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces that 

the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’) has extended the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(‘‘PSD’’) permit deadline for 

commencing construction for a final 

Clean Air Act PSD permit that 

authorizes Avenal Power Center, LLC 

(‘‘APC’’) to construct the Avenal Energy 

Project (‘‘AEP’’). The AEP is to be 

located in Kings County, California. 

DATES: EPA’s PSD permit for the AEP 

became effective on August 18, 2011, 

and included a deadline for 

commencing construction of February 

18, 2013. Prior to February 18, 2013, 

APC requested an 18-month extension 

of the deadline for commencing 

construction under the PSD permit for 

the AEP. EPA has granted such an 

extension until August 18, 2014. 

Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), 

judicial review of this extension 

decision may be sought by filing a 

petition for review in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

by September 9, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0190 for 

this action. Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at the following address: U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 

Francisco, CA 94105–3901. See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more 

information about how to make an 

appointment to view these hard copy 

documents during normal business 

hours at EPA Region IX’s office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shirley Rivera, Air Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San 

Francisco, CA 94105, 415–972–3966, 

rivera.shirley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AEP, 

proposed by APC, is a new 600- 

megawatt natural gas-fired combinedcycle power plant that will be located in 

Kings County, California. The PSD 

permit decision issued by EPA for the 

AEP became effective on August 18, 

2011 as published in the Federal 

Register on September 9, 2011 (76 FR 

55799). In November 2011, the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 

Circuit received petitions for review of 

EPA’s PSD permit decision for the AEP; 

this Court of Appeals proceeding is 

pending. In letters dated December 19, 

2012 and February 15, 2013, APC 

requested that EPA provide an 18- 

month extension of the deadline for 

commencing construction in the PSD 

permit for the AEP. Pursuant to 40 CFR 

Part 52.21(r), in a response to APC dated 

June 26, 2013, EPA Region 9 determined 

that a satisfactory showing justifying the 

extension had been made, and EPA 

extended the deadline for commencing 

construction in the PSD permit for AEP 

for 18 months, so that the PSD permit 

will become invalid if construction of 

the AEP is not commenced by August 

18, 2014. 

The docket for this action includes, 

among other documents, EPA’s analysis 

supporting this action. In addition to the 

electronic docket for this action, hard 

copy versions of the docket materials 

are available for public inspection 

during normal business hours at the 

following address: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. To arrange for viewing of these 

documents at EPA Region IX’s office, 

call Shirley Rivera at (415) 972–3966. 

Due to building security procedures, 

visitors should call at least 48 hours in 

advance to arrange a visit. 

Dated: June 26, 2013. 

Deborah Jordan, 

Director, Air Division, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2013–16334 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket No. 11–42; DA 13–1441] 

Lifeline and Link Up Modernization and 

Reform 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this Order, the Wireline 

Competition Bureau (Bureau) 

underscores certain compliance 

requirements that are contained in the 

Lifeline Reform Order and its 

accompanying rules. The Bureau 

codifies the Commission’s requirement 

that eligible telecommunications 

carriers (ETCs) verify a Lifeline 

subscriber’s eligibility for Lifeline 

service before activating such service, 

pursuant to the authority delegated in 

the Lifeline Reform Order. 

DATES: Effective August 8, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Radhika Karmarkar, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400 or 

TTY: (202) 418–0484. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES