alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42224.

#### WHITE v. THE STATE.

Deen, Judge.

1. The defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act under an indictment charging her with murder, death resulting from the performance of an abortion. There was ample evidence, including that of an eyewitness, that the abortion had been performed by the defendant and that as a result of infection following *438the surgical procedure the mother had died. Certain requests to charge were refused by the trial court, the requests being directed to the proposition that, under *Code*§ 26-1101, if the child was quick at the time of the abortion, the penalty would be that imposed for assault with intent to murder. That such an instruction would be error unless there was in fact evidence that the foetus was so far developed as to have independent life. See *Biegun v. State,*206 Ga. 618 (7) (58 SE2d 149). None of the evidence in this case would authorize such an inference. One witness said the defendant stated she would not perform the abortion if the girl were over three months pregnant, and that the decedent had stated there was a possibility she was not pregnant at all. A physician who examined her between the time of the abortion and her death stated that in his opinion the pregnancy had been of approximately six weeks duration, and another, who performed the autopsy, testified that “the uterus could not have contained a child of sufficiently advanced intrauterine maturity to kick,” and that its size was consistent with, but not diagnostic of, a pregnancy of about two months. There was no other evidence on the subject. The requested instructions were properly refused.

Submitted September 12, 1966

Decided September 29, 1966

Rehearing denied October 10, 1966

2. Under prior law, involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act was not a reducible felony *(Hayes v. State,*11 Ga. App. 371 (8) (75 SE 523)), and it was again excepted in Ga. L. 1939, pp. 285, 287 *(Code Ann.*§ 27-2501) from those felonies which might on recommendation of the jury be reduced to misdemeanors. Ga. L. 1964, pp. 483, 484, providing in Sec. 5, that “Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude either the jury or the judge from reducing the punishment for felonies to misdemeanors as provided by an Act approved March 24, 1939 (Ga. L. 1939, p. 285)” in no way affected the existing law as to what felonies might or might not be reducible. The court correctly refused a request to charge the jury that they might recommend misdemeanor punishment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*

*439
      *Aaron Kravitch,*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Andrew J. Ryan, III,*for appellee.
#### SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. V. LEMLEY.

(Decided Nov. 21, 1911.

Rehearing denied June 19, 1912.)

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson.

Lawrence E. Brown, for appellant. Virgil Boulbin, for appellee.

de Graffenried, J. —

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *So. Ry. Co. v. Morgan,*171 Ala. 294.
#### § 21.6525 [Reserved]
#### § 23.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A Kruger, Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Brian CarterBrian Carter, Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4304 Deviations; changes of identity.

A deviation of more than 5 percent between the estimates upon which a certificate of commitment has been issued and the report of final payment of the proceeds of the loan, or a change in the identity of the property upon which the original appraisal was based, will invalidate the certificate of commitment unless such deviation or change be approved by the Secretary. Any deviation in excess of 5 percent or change in the identity of the property upon which the original appraisal was based must be supported by a new or supplemental appraisal of reasonable value: Provided, That substitution of materials of equal or better quality and value approved by the veteran and the designated appraiser shall not be deemed a “change in the identity of the property” within the purview of this section. A deviation not in excess of 5 percent will not require the prior approval of the Secretary.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))
07/03/2012 10:04 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS @001/002



## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF

# TRANSPORTATION~

# e c e 1veo

Z:Jt

## l 

## ..3

In the Matterof OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## .)N 

# 2g

# 28l2
. !!: 

## 0\ WASHINGTON, D.C

. June 28,2012

## ~,~EARING 

# DOCKET
FAA DOCKET NO. CP09AL0011 (Civil PenaltyAction) MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

### ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) 

# _____________________) DMS 

### NO. FAA-,2009-0972 Judge: The Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin

MOTION TO WITHDRAW REQUEST FORA HEARING AND DISMISS THE PROCEEDING


### Pursuant to 

### 14 C.F.R. §13.215, respondent Mesa Airlines, Inc. ("Mesa") hereby moves to withdraw the requestfor a hearing and dismiss this proceeding. As part ofthe claims resolution process 

### in the Chapter 11 

### bankruptcy reorganization of Mesa and its Parent, Mesa Air Group, Inc., the Parties have reached a settlement of this matter, resulting in the resolution ofthe underlying claim in issue in the Complaint. Accordingly, Mesa moves to withdraw the request for a hearing and to dismiss the proceeding.

'\1)0 · 0238GG/000002 • 34:?2GA 1 vI 

### Chnsto ·her
. Pappaioanou 

### V.P. Legal Affairs Mesa Air Group, Inc. 410 

### North 44th 

### Street, Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ85008 TEL: 602-685-4000 

### FAX: 602-685-4350 

### Respondent's Counsel



### 1' . i 07/03/2012 10:04 FAX 2024835142 FAA

SERVICE 

### LIST + OMS**~** 002/002

FAA Docket No. CP09AL0011 (Civil PenaltyAction) I certify that June 28, 2012, I caused this Motion to Withdraw Request for

### a Hearing and Dismiss the Proceeding to be served on the following bythe methods identified: ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue 

### S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2W1000 (BY U.S. Mail)

. ONE COPY Laura E. Jennings. FAA Counsel Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 TEL: 202-267-3452 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2139Attorney-Advisor (202) 366·5121 Legal Assistant FAX: (202) 366-7536 (BY U.S. MAIL AND FACSIMILE)



# ..**~**

·2
An equal opportunity employer

Thomas M. Gray

211(b) Technical Manager

1220 L Street, Northwest

Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480

Fax 202-682-8270

E-mail grayt@api.org

March 23, 2011

Karl Simon

Division Director

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail Code: 6406J

Washington, DC 20460

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Final Submission 

for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07)

Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Toxicity Study 

in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and a 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity 

Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6129)

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the 

following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of 

the testing regulation:

Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole Body Inhalation Toxicity 

Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and a 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and 

Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6129)

The Final Report has undergone review by two independent peer-reviewers, EPA, outside QA/QC, and the 211(b) 

Technical Workgroup. Therefore the report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and 

Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 

211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). 

The EPA Memorandum (Hauchman to Oge, April 27, 2010) requested that Summary and Conclusion sections of

the report be revised at the time of final report submission. The RG response to the EPA comments is attached to 

this transmittal letter. If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please 

contact me.

Regards,

Thomas M. Gray, M.S., DABT

Encl (2): Final report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Toxicity Study 

in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and a 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity 

Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6129

RG response to comments in EPA Memorandum (Hauchman to Oge, April 27, 2010)
Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
SCALE 1:24,000

LUDLOW QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Ludlow Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1969.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Map units were modified from Leo (1974) using

unpublished field maps by F.D. Larsen (1976).

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 20 of 24)

(S

P

RIN

G

FIELD

N

O

R

TH)

(PALM

E

R)

(BELCHERTOWN)

(HAMPDEN) 72°22'30"W

72°22'30"W

72°30'0"W

72°30'0"W

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

42°7'30"N

42°7'30"N

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2654 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2654

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, as the 
               ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELEANOR MCGOVERN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eleanor 
McGovern Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2654

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 202 South Dumont Avenue in Woonsocket, South Dakota, as the 
               ``Eleanor McGovern Post Office Building''.
```
Supreme Court — Appellate Term,

June, 1900.

Before Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

#### Louis Rosenthal, Respondent, v. Jacob Rosenthal et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a Judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan.

C. JL Schampain, for Appellants; J. Marks, for Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No
#### § 17.525 Purpose.

The purpose of §§ 17.525 through 17.531 is to establish the Specialty Education Loan Repayment Program (SELRP). The SELRP is an incentive program for certain individuals to meet VA's need for physicians in medical specialties for which VA determines that recruitment and retention of qualified personnel is difficult. Assistance under the SELRP may be in addition to other assistance available to individuals under the Educational Assistance Program under 38 U.S.C. 7601.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 4(c)



                             [STOCK CERTIFICATE]

               NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                                           CUSIP NO. 910900 20 8

                              UNITED ENERGY CORP.

              PAR VALUE ONE CENT PER SHARE - NON ASSESSABLE VOTING

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF

                   Shares of UNITED ENERGY CORP. Common Stock

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar.

      Witness the facsimiile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

                                [SEAL OF NEVADA]


[illegible]                             [illegible]
-------------------------------         ----------------------------------------
                      SECRETARY                                        PRESIDENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
         registrant's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and
         is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              15,703
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          2,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    43,115
<PP&E>                                              87,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     455,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              511,277
<BONDS>                                             15,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            26,554
<OTHER-SE>                                       (107,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       455,165
<SALES>                                             75,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    75,433
<CGS>                                               31,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       31,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   412,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (371,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (371,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (371,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 360.1 General.

This subpart prescribes procedures under 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(4)(A) and 17 U.S.C. 119(b)(4) whereby parties claiming entitlement to cable compulsory license royalty fees or satellite compulsory license royalty fees must file claims with the Copyright Royalty Board.
# Official Journal C 386/31 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 386 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5731 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 386

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5731 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 386/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2014 to 31 July 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2014/C 386/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2014 to 30 September 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 3 |
| 2014/C 386/03 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2014 to 30 September 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 14 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 386/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2014 to 31 July 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2014/C 386/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2014 to 30 September 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

3

2014/C 386/03

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2014 to 30 September 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

14

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 21.9740 False, late, or missing reports. ( a ) *Eligible individual.* Payments may not be based on false or misleading statements, claims or reports. VA will apply the provisions of §§ 21.4006 and 21.4007 to any individual who submits false or misleading claims, statements, or reports in connection with benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 33 in the same manner as they are applied to people who make similar false or misleading claims for benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 36. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3323(a), 3680, 3690, 6103)
( b ) *Institution of higher learning.* ( 1 ) VA may hold an institution of higher learning liable for overpayments that result from the institution of higher learning's willful or negligent failure to report excessive absences from a course, discontinuance of a course, or interruption of a course by an individual or from willful or negligent false certification by the institution of higher learning. See § 21.9695(b).
( 2 ) If an institution of higher learning willfully and knowingly submits a false report or certification, VA may disapprove that institution of higher learning's programs of education for further enrollments and may discontinue educational assistance to eligible individuals already enrolled. In doing so, VA will apply §§ 21.4210 through 21.4216.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3323(a), 3690)
#### §§ 39.52-39.59 [Reserved]
§ 77.10 Peer review methods. ( a ) VA may subject both pre-applications and formal applications to a peer review process. For both competitive and noncompetitive applications, peer review will normally consist of written comments based on the selection criteria established in § 77.5 and any weighting factors identified in the NOFA or conveyed in writing to the noncompetitive applicant, together with the assignment of numerical values. Peer review may occur at meetings of peer reviewers that are held under VA oversight, through mail reviews, or a combination of both. When advisable, site visits may also be employed. The method of peer review anticipated for each announced competitive program, including the weighting factors to be used by peer reviewers, will be specified in each NOFA.
( b ) When formal applications are required in response to a NOFA, an initial review will be conducted by qualified VA staff, in order to eliminate from peer review consideration applications which do not meet minimum program requirements. Such requirements as listed in § 77.5 and weighting factors will be specified in the NOFA. Applications determined to be qualified and eligible for further consideration may then be considered under the peer review process.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo24603 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
§ 78.120 Amount and payment of grants. ( a ) *Amount of grants.* The maximum funding that a grantee may be awarded under this part is $750,000 per fiscal year.
( b ) *Payment of grants.* Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and manner set forth in the NOFO.