alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2
 THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 Agreement Date of Grant Company Participant Plan
 Participant:
    
    Mr. Ronald FenechAddress:Total Option Shares:
    
    750,000 shares of Thor common stockExercise Price Per Share:
    
    $35.18Date of Grant:
    
    April 28, 2010Expiration Date:
    
    April 28, 2020
 Type of Stock Option(Check One):
    
    o Incentive Stock Optionþ Nonstatutory Stock Option
 1. Grant of Option Option Shares Exercise
Price
 2. Exercise Period; Vesting




---



##### 



3. Expiration
 4. Termination of Continuous Service
 Forfeiture of Unvested Options; Cause
 Termination for Any Reason Except Death, Disability or Cause
 Termination Because of Death or Disability
 No Obligation to Employ
 5. Manner of Exercise
 Stock Option Exercise Agreement Exercise Agreement
 2




---



##### 



Tax Withholding
 Issuance of Shares
 6. Compliance With Laws And Regulations
 7. Nontransferability of Option
 8. Privileges of Stock Ownership
 9. Securities Law Restrictions on Transfer
 3




---



##### 



10. Adjustments Upon Changes in Stock
 11. Restrictive Covenants
 Confidentiality
 Non-solicitation and Non-competition
 12. General
 Interpretation
 Entire Agreement
 4




---



##### 



Notices
 Successors and Assigns
 Governing Law
 13. Acceptance
 14. Section 409A Limitation
  5




---



##### 



THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
    
    
    
    PARTICIPANTBy:
    
    /s/ Peter B. Orthwein
    
    
    
    /s/ Ronald FenechName: Peter B. Orthwein
    
    
    
    (Signature)Title:   Chairman, President & CEORonald Fenech(Please print name)
 6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 FORM OF STOCK OPTION EXERCISE AGREEMENT
 [ ] Incentive Stock Option
    
    
    
    Optionee:[ ] Nonstatutory Stock Option
    
    
    
    Date:
 STOCK OPTION EXERCISE NOTICE
 
  1. Option Option Shares Company Plan Stock
Option Agreement
 Date of Option Grant:Number of Option Shares:Exercise Price per Share:
    
    $
 2. Exercise of Option
 Total Shares Purchased:Total Exercise Price
    
    (Total Shares X Price per Share)

    
    
    $
 3. Payments
 Cash:   $Check: $
 4. Tax Withholding
 A-1




---



##### 



5. Optionee Information .
  
  
 6. Notice of Disqualifying Disposition
 7. Binding Effect
  Very truly yours,(Signature)   By:Name:Title:Dated: A-2
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Papua New Guinea

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Papua New Guinea			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea

During the review period, the government made budget documents publicly available.  The enacted budget and end-of-year report were published online, but the executive budget proposal was not.  Information on debt obligations was not available in a reasonable period of time, including for state-owned enterprises.  Publicly available budget documents were incomplete and did not include royalties and levies from the oil and gas industry held in off-budget trust accounts, which lacked adequate oversight and audit.  The information in the budget was considered generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its reports publicly available within a reasonable period of time.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were specified in law.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards in the mining sector was publicly available, but not in the oil and gas sector. Sovereign wealth funds disclosed their sources of funding and general approaches to withdrawals. Papua New Guinea’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing debt information in a reasonable period of time, including for state-owned enterprises;
- establishing adequate audit and oversight for revenues from natural resources and spending from associated off-budget trust accounts;
- making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and publishes complete audit reports within a reasonable period of time; and
- publishing basic information regarding natural resource extraction awards.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentPapua New Guinea

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-412 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Global Peace Operations Initiative 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ITALY 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Rome April 6 and 12, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ITALY 

 Defense: Global Peace Operations Initiative 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Rome April 6 and 12, 2006; 

 Entered into force April 12, 2006.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4492

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SILVANO TEJADA-CRUZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CR-03-369)
Submitted: June 10, 2005 Decided: June 27, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Silvano Tejada-Cruz appeals the district court’s judgment entered pursuant to his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b) (2000). On appeal, Tejada-Cruz asserts that in applying the three-point increase to his criminal history points, the district court engaged in unconstitutional fact-finding, in vio lation of Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). He does not cha llenge his conviction on appeal. Because Tejada-Cruz did not object to the sentencing range set forth in the Presentence Report (“PSR”) and adopted by the district court, this court’s review of the district court’s guideline calculation is for plain error. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732 (199 3); United States v. Hughes , 401 F.3d 540, 547 (4th Cir. 2005). Under the plain error standard, Tejada-Cruz must show: (1) there was error; (2) the error was plain; and (3) the error affected his substantial rights. Olano , 507 U.S. at 732- 34. Even when these conditions are satisfied, this court may exercise its discretion to notice the error only if the error “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 736 (internal quotation marks omitted).Because Tejada-Cruz is not challenging the fact of his prior convictions or disputing a fact about the convictions, we- 3 - conclude that the district court’s addition of three points to his criminal history score based on the prior convictions and their recency did not violate his Sixth Amendment rights. United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005) (reaffirming its holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), that “any fact other than a prior conviction” must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury); Shepard v. United States , 125 S. Ct. 1254, 1262 (2005) (recognizing the prior conviction exception post Booker , but holding that Sixth Amendment protections apply to disputed facts about a prior conviction).Accordingly, because we find no error, we affirm TejadaCruz’s conviction and sentence. Olano , 507 U.S. at 732-34; Hughes , 401 F.3d at 547. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Fermanis, certify that:


1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB/A of IR  BioSciences
Holdings, Inc.


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods represented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.  evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


                    /S/ John Fermanis
                    -----------------------
                    JOHN FERMANIS
                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    NOVEMBER 16, 2005


<
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       May 15, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Brian      M. Carter                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Brian      M. Carter                                     |   |
|                          |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                                     |   |
P. 1



# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 208 ) IV-C-17

5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:02 AM Sheet 208of 232P. 2



## JU LI 7 133 ! 

# flJ_J_J_JL_U. .fjj )

AU G- I 1991 Governor.Jame s G . Marti n Stat e o f Nort h Carolin a Offic e o f the Governo r Raleigh , NC 27603-800 1 Dea r Governo r Martin : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r t o EPAAdministrato r WilliamK . Reill ydate d Jun e 12 , 1991 , regarding the implementatio n o f onboar d refueling vapo r control s for.moto r vehicles . W e appreciat e you r comments . A s yo u pointe d ou t i n you r letter , Congres s directe d the EPAt o promulgat e a n onboar d rul e withi n on e yea r o f enactmen t o f the Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendments , tha t is , b yNovembe r 15 , 1991 . I t als o directe d EPAt o consul t wit h the Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) regarding onboar d systemsafet ya s par t o f thi s rulemaking . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , whic h i s par t o f th e DOT , i s planning t o releas e a n assessmen t o f onboar d systemsafet ythi s month . Whe n w e receiv e thi s repor t EPAwil l publis h a notic e i n the Federa l Registe r announcing th e reopening o f th e publi c commen t perio d o n th e origina l onboar d proposal , whic h wa s issue d i n 1987 . Becaus e thi s wa s severa l year s ago , the Federa l Registe r notic e wil l contai n a n assessmen t o f circumstance s tha t hav e change d sinc e tha t time . W e wil l als o conduc t a publi c hearing o n the matte r late r thi s summer . Thank s agai n fo r you r comments . Theywil l b e include d i n th e publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e i f yo u requir e an yadditiona l information . Sincerel yyours , 

### ORIGINA L SIGNED ' B Y DONAL D E . ZINGE R Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s SDSB:H.Puliese:334:256 5 Plymout h Rd:DD#4738 W Las t Reviewe d b

yPhi l Lorang:7/16/91:Contro l No . AX91192 4 Reviewe d b

yDZINGER:hp:x27647:7/17/91:AR-455:Wang N0-2328 T
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing the price of the United States Mint 2009 Braille Education Set.

Public Law 109-247, the Louis Braille Bicentennial-Braille Literacy Commemorative Coin Act, authorizes the United States Mint to mint and issue 2009 Louis Braille Bicentennial Silver Dollars. In addition to these commemorative coins, the United States Mint is offering a limited edition collectible product capturing the life and legacy of Louis Braille and the importance the Braille system plays in the literacy and independence of blind people. This product will consist of a Louis Braille Bicentennial Uncirculated Silver Dollar presented in a folder designed to highlight the life of Louis Braille.

The United States Mint 2009 Braille Education Set will be offered for sale on October 8, 2009, at a price of $44.95.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B.B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing, United States Mint, 801 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority:31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

Dated: September 23, 2009.

Edmund C. Moy,

Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. E9-23382 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
- 00000001
- 00000002
- 00000003
- 00000004
- 00000005
- 00000006
- 00000007
- 00000008
- 00000009
- 00000010
- 00000011
- 00000012
- 00000013
- 00000014
- 00000015
- 00000016
- 00000017
- 00000018
- 00000019
- 00000020
- 00000021
- 00000022
- 00000023
- 00000024
- 00000025
- 00000026
- 00000027
- 00000028
- 00000029
- 00000030
- 00000031
- 00000032
- 00000033
- 00000034
- 00000035
- 00000036
- 00000037
- 00000038
- 00000039
- 00000040
- 00000041
- 00000042
- 00000043
- 00000044
- 00000045
- 00000046
- 00000047
- 00000048
- 00000049
- 00000050
- 00000051
- 00000052
- 00000053
- 00000054
- 00000055
- 00000056
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Notice of Closed Meeting

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby  given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and  552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel. K99.                

*Date:*                     October 29, 2009.                

*Time:*                     1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate grant applications.                

*Place:*                     National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call).                

*Contact Person:*                     Megan Libbey, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6148, MSC 9609, Rockville, MD 20852-9609. 301-402-6807.                      *libbeym@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 21, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23337 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 4.71 Measurement of ankylosis and joint motion.

Plates I and II provide a standardized description of ankylosis and joint motion measurement. The anatomical position is considered as 0°, with two major exceptions: (a) Shoulder rotation—arm abducted to 90°, elbow flexed to 90° with the position of the forearm reflecting the midpoint 0° between internal and external rotation of the shoulder; and (b) supination and pronation—the arm next to the body, elbow flexed to 90°, and the forearm in midposition 0° between supination and pronation. Motion of the thumb and fingers should be described by appropriate reference to the joints (See Plate III) whose movement is limited, with a statement as to how near, in centimeters, the tip of the thumb can approximate the fingers, or how near the tips of the fingers can approximate the proximal transverse crease of palm.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04NO91.001/EC04NO91.001_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04NO91.001/EC04NO91.001_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04NO91.002/EC04NO91.002_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04NO91.002/EC04NO91.002_original_size.png)

[[29 FR 6718](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/29-FR-6718), May 22, 1964, as amended at [43 FR 45349](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/43-FR-45349), Oct. 2, 1978; [67 FR 48785](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-48785), July 26, 2002]
# Official Journal C 153A/2 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 612 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 612 May 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Systemic Risk Board |
| 2018/C 153 A/01 | Call for expressions of interest from external experts to be appointed as members of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Systemic Risk Board

2018/C 153 A/01

Call for expressions of interest from external experts to be appointed as members of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN