alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                              |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                                                          |   |   |   |
| Ben-Tsur                Joseph, Chief Executive/Financial Officer |   |   |        |
| August                14,                2006                     |   |   |   |

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                        5695
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                17039
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  10567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             33301
<PP&E>                                     2982608
<DEPRECIATION>                            (1714511)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1301398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3393893
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                  45064365
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2525598
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            667584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           83750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (751334)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (751334)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.033)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0792

SAT Date: 9/3/2014

Print Date: 9/30/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0792-94

FATE: Estimations for low weight polymer 

 MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 0.44 (E) 

S = Disp. (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 1.72 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)
log Fish BAF = -0.024 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fractions 

 is expected to be poor all routes (pchem). Concern for lung toxicity from 

interference with the natural balance of the lungs.

 Test Data: P14-0794: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; rat 

oral LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; some eye irritation in rabbits that cleared by day 6; no skin irritation in 

rabbits; no skin sensitization in guinea pigs using the Buehler assay

: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; no 

skin sensitization in a human Repeated Insult Patch Test as a neat oil; no eye irritation in the in 

vitro EpiOcular assay

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.7

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.4

green algal 96-h EC50 1.5

fish _ chronic value 0.709

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.844

algal _ chronic 

value

0.529

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for 

SAR chemical class = 

; modified log Kow = 4.8 (P); 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/ L;;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

53
SARs Nonionic 

SAR Class Nonionic 

Ecotox Category Nonionic 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2282 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2282

  To prohibit the use of Global Nuclear Energy Partnership funds for 
                     certain nuclear waste storage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2007

     Mrs. Schmidt (for herself, Mr. Space, and Mr. Wilson of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of Global Nuclear Energy Partnership funds for 
                     certain nuclear waste storage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Storage Prohibition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    The Secretary of Energy shall not use any funds made available for 
the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership initiative for the transfer or 
storage of spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste to any 
site that is not a site where facilities for reprocessing of that fuel 
or waste have been constructed or are under construction. No spent 
nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste may be retained for long-
term storage at such a site where facilities for reprocessing of fuel 
or waste have been constructed or are under construction.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification Pursuant toSection
  302
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd;

1. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

2. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

3. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Issuers fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2005, that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers
internal control over financial reporting.

4. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditor and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 14, 2006

/s/ Garry L. AnselmoGarry
L. AnselmoPrincipal Accounting Officer

---
Order entered October 1, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00685-CV

ASSOCIATED AIR CENTER LP, ET AL, Appellant

V.

TARY NETWORK, LTD, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-01620

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the sealed clerk’s record in this case. The district clerk has 

sealed the entire record. Upon review of the record, it appears that the trial court ordered sealed 

only three exhibits to motions, specifically exhibits “C” and “D” to Plaintiff’s Motion to Set 

Certain of Defendant’s Corporate Representative Topics for Hearing and Motion to Compel and 

exhibit “E” to Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s No Evidence Motion for 

Summary Judgment. The trial court did not direct the district clerk to seal the entire record. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Gary Fitzsimmons, District Clerk of Dallas County, to 

file within ten (10) days of the date of this order a corrected clerk’s record that files under seal 

only the three documents the trial court ordered sealed and to file unsealed all remaining items 
that the parties have requested or that the rules of appellate procedure require to be included in 

the clerk’s record.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 12, 2003

                                              By: /s/ Daniel Bernstein
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                    Daniel Bernstein, President
                                                     and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 19.28 Determination that a Notice of Disagreement is inadequate protested by claimant or representative.

Whether a Notice of Disagreement is adequate is an appealable issue. If the claimant or his or her representative protests an adverse determination made by the agency of original jurisdiction with respect to the adequacy of a Notice of Disagreement, the claimant will be furnished a Statement of the Case.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105 (2016))

[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### William Wirth et al., Appellants, *v.*Franz Kahlenberg, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, rendered upon a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Davis & Kaufmann (Edward S. Kaufmann, of counsel), for appellants.

Isaac Marks (William Ash, on brief), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think that the trial justice erred in his construction of the contract made between the parties; even the tesmony of defendant proves the justness of this conclusion, because *804he testifies that when said contract was made, the excavation for the foundation wall to he erected on the opposite side of the plaintiffs’ lot was completed. Plaintiffs’ testimony was that not only was the excavation made, but the foundation wall was partially built and run down to the depth of ten or eleven feet. At least we think it was the duty of the trial justice to allow the jury to determine as a question of fact what was the real meaning and intention of the contracting parties in making such contract. In view of the uncertain and ambiguous expressions employed therein, we believe that the court should not have interpreted the contract, but should have left that function to the jury and let them determine and define the intention of the parties thereto, looking to- all the surrounding facts, circumstances and pre-existing relations between the parties and in that way determine their intention and meaning in entering into the same.

Present: Fitzsimoks, Ch. J., and Oowlau, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2563 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 312
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2563

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott 
                         Nisely Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR SCOTT NISELY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Scott Nisely Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Scott Nisely Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 312

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2563

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott 
                         Nisely Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
05/02/2012 15:04 FAX 2024935142 FAA**:~~rNHMENT**

## OF

..**~·~?;·!~POF~T;~T+Of~J.** 

## JOSEPH W. GELDHOF

·.vr,Ef 

## OPt...RA,JO!\!S AttorneyatLaw 2 Marine Way, Suite 207**~t**

## !l ;i{\

### Y**-~**

### 2 P**L~:** 

### 05 Juneau, Alaska 99801

(907) 586-8193 [Office] (907) 723-9901 [Mobile] E-mail: joeg@alaska.com VIA: U.S.P.S. Regular Delivery + OMS @001/001



# RECEIVED APR f

## 9

# 201 HEARING DOCKET April 6, 2012 Glenn H. Brown, Senior Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration U11ited States Department ofTransportation 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 Re: Proposed Civil Penaltyfor Scott Novak DearMr. Brown: I represent Scott Novak, a resident of Juneau, Alaska. Mr. Novak recently received correspondence from the Federal Aviation Administration proposing to fine him $2,700 for unknowingly shipping some of his daughter's cosmetics aboard a commercial air carrier in Alaska. On behalf of Mr. Novak, a hearing is requested according to Subpart G of Part 13, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Given that Mr. Novak is a resident of Juneau, Alaska, l am requesting thatthe hearing be held in Juneau, Alaska. Please call me ifyou have any questions about these matters.

Copy: Hearing Docket; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk /. Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room 924A Washington, DC 20591 Mr. Scott Novak /
#### Margaret J. Hassard, Respondent, *v.*James Harold Warner, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term.

David C. Bennett, Jr., for appellant.

B. Gerson Oppenheim, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

With a view to at once quiet the apprehensions of the parties and prevent possible further preliminary motions in adjusting their differences, and that the issues may be promptly and properly disposed of, the order appealed from herein will be affirmed, without costs.

Present: Hasp alt, and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Order affirmed, without costs.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Sarissa Capital Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

 
Date: March 31, 2022   
/s/ Alexander Denner
   Alexander Denner   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
 
**
§ 79.65 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). When funds are available for legal services grants, VA will publish a NOFO in the Federal Register and on *grants.gov*. The notice will identify: ( a ) The location for obtaining legal services grant applications;
( b ) The date, time, and place for submitting completed legal services grant applications;
( c ) The estimated amount and type of legal services grant funding available, including the maximum grant funding available per award;
( d ) Any priorities for or exclusions from funding to meet the statutory mandates of 38 U.S.C. 2022A and VA goals for the Grant Program;
( e ) The length of term for the legal services grant award;
( f ) Specific point values to be awarded for each criterion listed in §§ 79.35 and 79.45;
( g ) The minimum number of total points and points per category that an applicant or grantee, as applicable, must receive in order for a legal services grant to be funded;
( h ) Any maximum uses of legal services grant funds for specific legal services;
( i ) The timeframes and manner for payments under the legal services grant; and
( j ) Other information necessary for the legal services grant application process as determined by VA, including the requirements, goals, and objectives of the Grant Program, and how the preference under § 79.40(d)(3) may be met.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67725-67726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 346]

Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary 
for East Asian and Pacific Affairs of the Authority To Waive the Visa 
Ban Under the JADE Act

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary by the laws of 
the United

[[Page 67726]]

States, including the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), Section 5(a) of the Tom Lantos Block Burmese 
Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts (JADE) Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-286), 
Presidential Memorandum of August 29, 2012, I hereby delegate to the 
Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, to the extent 
authorized by law, the authority under Section 5(a)(2) to waive the 
visa bans imposed pursuant to Section 5(a)(1) of Public Law 110-286.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources 
may at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This document shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 29, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-27547 Filed 11-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```