alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2559 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Higher Education Extension Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 
2007'' and inserting ``October 31, 2007''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23368]



[[Page 49364]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Air Force Research Laboratory et al.; Notice of Decision on 
Applicationfor Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no 
instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument 
described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that 
was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
    Docket Number: 09-045. Applicant: Air Force Research Laboratory, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433. Instrument: Tilting Goniometer Stages, 
with Resistive Encoders. Manufacturer: Attocube Systems AG, Germany. 
Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 44350, August 28, 2009. Reasons: This 
instrument is unique and is essential to enable the characterization 
and measurement of micromechanical properties of structural aerospace 
metals. Specifically, the instrument can move linear position less than 
5nm wide and to move objects to distances over 5nm and has millidegree 
resolution and a range of tilt of at least 5 degrees. No domestic 
sources make devices with similar capabilities.
    Docket Number: 09-046. Applicant: National Renewable Energy 
Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401. Instrument: Sidewinder Upgrade (ion 
column) Accessory for Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, 
the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 44350, August 28, 
2009. Reasons: This instrument is unique and is essential to the study 
of the chemistry, crystallography and structural morphology of 
materials used in the development of photovoltaic devices. We know of 
no electron microscope, or accessory thereto, suited to these purposes, 
which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order 
of this instrument.

    Dated: September 22, 2009.
Christopher D. Cassel,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-23368 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 23.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 23.300 through 23.310.
#### § 18.547 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

Certain VA procedural provisions applicable to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to VA enforcement of these regulations. They are found at §§ 18.9 through 18.11 and part 18b of this title.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-1607)
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997, and 62 FR 45733, Sept. 9, 1997.

§ 9.10 Health standards. ( a ) For the purpose of determining if a member who incurred a disability or aggravated a preexisting disability during a period of active duty or active duty for training under a call to duty specifying a period of less than 31 days or during a period of inactive duty was rendered uninsurable at standard premium rates, the underwriting criteria used by the insurer in determining good health for persons applying to it for life insurance in amounts not exceeding the maximum amount of coverage then available under 38 U.S.C. 1967 will be used. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1967)
( b ) For all other purposes of determining if a member meets the necessary health requirements except paragraph (a) of this section, the underwriting criteria used by the insurer in determining good health for group life insurance purposes will be used.
[40 FR 4135, Jan. 28, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 17699, May 18, 1988. Redesignated at 61 FR 20135, May 6, 1996]
§ 21.88 Individualized employment assistance plan. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the IEAP (Individualized Employment Assistance Plan) is to assure that a comprehensive, thoughtful approach is taken, enabling eligible veterans to secure suitable employment. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107)
( b ) *Requirement for a plan.* An IEAP will be prepared: ( 1 ) As part of an IWRP; or
( 2 ) When the veteran is eligible for employment assistance under provisions of § 21.47. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107(a))
( c ) *Elements of the plan.* The IEAP shall follow the same structure as the IWRP. Each IEAP will include full utilization of community resources to enable the veteran to: ( 1 ) Secure employment; and
( 2 ) Maintain employment. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3117)
( d ) *Preparation of the IEAP.* Preparation of the IEAP will be completed: ( 1 ) No later than 60 days before the projected end of the period of rehabilitation services leading to the point of employability; or
( 2 ) Following initial evaluation when employment services constitute the whole of the veteran's program under provisions of § 21.47.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107(a))
§ 1092.102 Submission and use of registration information. ( a ) *Filing instructions.* The Bureau shall specify the form and manner for electronic filings and submissions to the nonbank registry that are required or made voluntarily under this part. The Bureau also may provide for extensions of deadlines or time periods prescribed by this part for persons affected by declared disasters or other emergency situations.
( b ) *Coordination or combination of systems.* In administering the nonbank registry, the Bureau may rely on information a person previously submitted to the nonbank registry under this part and may coordinate or combine systems in consultation with State agencies as described in 12 U.S.C. 5512(c)(7)(C) and 12 U.S.C. 5514(b)(7)(D).
( c ) *Bureau use of registration information.* The Bureau may use the information submitted to the nonbank registry under this part to support its objectives and functions, including in determining when to exercise its authority under 12 U.S.C. 5514 to conduct examinations and when to exercise its enforcement powers under subtitle E of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010. However, this part does not alter any applicable process whereby a person may dispute that it qualifies as a person subject to Bureau authority.
( d ) *Calculation of time periods.* In computing any date or period of time prescribed by this part, exclude the day of the event that triggers the period; count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays; and include the last day of the period. If any provision of this part would establish a deadline for an action that is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the deadline is extended to the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday.
#### § 1010.19 [Reserved]
#### §§ 1010.201-1010.207 [Reserved]
§ 1002.102 Definitions. In this subpart: ( a ) *Affiliate* means, with respect to a financial institution, any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, another company, as set forth in the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*). With respect to a business or an applicant, *affiliate* shall have the same meaning as in 13 CFR 121.103.
( b ) *Applicant* means any person who requests or who has received an extension of business credit from a financial institution.
( c ) *Business* is defined in § 1002.106(a).
( d ) *Business credit* shall have the same meaning as in § 1002.2(g).
( e ) *Closed-end credit transaction* means an extension of business credit that is not an open-end credit transaction under paragraph (n) of this section.
( f ) *Covered application* is defined in § 1002.103.
( g ) *Covered credit transaction* is defined in § 1002.104.
( h ) *Covered financial institution* is defined in § 1002.105(b).
( i ) *Credit* shall have the same meaning as in § 1002.2(j).
( j ) *Financial institution* is defined in § 1002.105(a).
( k ) *LGBTQI+ individual* includes an individual who identifies as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex.
( l ) *LGBTQI+-owned business* means a business for which one or more LGBTQI+ individuals hold more than 50 percent of its ownership or control, and for which more than 50 percent of the net profits or losses accrue to one or more such individuals.
( m ) *Minority-owned business* means a business for which one or more American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, or Hispanic or Latino individuals hold more than 50 percent of its ownership or control, and for which more than 50 percent of the net profits or losses accrue to one or more such individuals.
( n ) *Open-end credit transaction* means an open-end credit plan as defined in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.2(a)(20), but without regard to whether the credit is consumer credit, as defined in § 1026.2(a)(12), is extended by a creditor, as defined in § 1026.2(a)(17), or is extended to a consumer, as defined in § 1026.2(a)(11).
( o ) *Principal owner* means an individual who directly owns 25 percent or more of the equity interests of a business.
( p ) *Small business* is defined in § 1002.106(b).
( q ) Small business lending application register or register means the data reported, or required to be reported, annually pursuant to § 1002.109.
( r ) *State* shall have the same meaning as in § 1002.2(aa).
( s ) *Women-owned business* means a business for which more than 50 percent of its ownership or control is held by one or more women, and more than 50 percent of its net profits or losses accrue to one or more women.
#### Catherine Reidy, Respondent, *v.*Abraham I. Bleistift, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

April, 1900.)

Judgment — Motion to vacate not barred by refusal to set aside inquest.

The denial of a *motion to*set aside an inquest is not a bar to a subsequent motion to vacate the judgment, then taken, as excessive in that the complaint did not justify the recovery.

This is a reargument of an appeal from an order of July 29, 1899, which denied a motion made by the defendant to set aside a judgment as irregular, and of the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss an appeal herein from an order of July 7, 1899, which denied a motion made on behalf of the defendant to set aside an inquest taken on the defendant’s default at the trial.

Arthur Furber, for appellant.

Earley, Heath & Stewart (Henry GL K. Heath, of counsel), for respondent.

O’Dwyeb, J.

The time to appeal directly from the order of July seventh had expired when the notice of appeal was served, and conceding (without so deciding) that that order is an intermediate order affecting the final judgment and entitled to review upon appeal from the final judgment (Code Civ. Pro., §§ 1301, 1316), inasmuch as the appeal from the final judgment herein has been dismissed, the appeal from the intermediate order falls, and the motion to dismiss that appeal must therefore be granted, with ten dollars costs. The disposition thus far made of the appeal taken by the defendant herein now leaves for our consideration the appeal from the order of July 29, 1899. Hpon a former hearing of the appeal it was held that the judgment wa£ excessive, it being for a greater sum thani the complaint justified, and, to that extent, we agree with the decision then made. The respondent now insists that the denial of the motion to set aside the inquest was a bar to the motion to vacate the judgment, but *182we do not agree with him in this contention. The two motions were aimed at different relief. The inquest was properly ordered and the motion to set it aside properly denied. The defendant was not entitled to that relief, hut when the judgment was entered and it then appeared that the recovery was for more than the cause of action set forth in the complaint permitted, then the defendant was entitled to have the judgment so entered modified, and the recovery therein limited to the amount justified hy the complaint.

The order appealed from will he reversed and the motion to vacate the judgment granted, without costs, unless within ten days the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment so that the plaintiff shall recover $153, principal, with interest thereon from January 1, 1897, together with the costs of the action and a five per cent, extra ’allowance upon the amount of principal and interest; in which event the order of July 29, 1899, will he affirmed, without costs.

Has gall and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Order reversed and motion granted, without costs, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce judgment so that plaintiff shall recover $153, principal, with interest from January 1, 1897, together with costs, in which event, order affirmed, without costs.
#### Karen J. BERG, Ellen L. Berg, and Larry J. Berg, minors, by Joyce M. Berg, their Guardian Ad Litem, and Joyce M. Berg, individually, Appellants, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Wisconsin Corporation, Appellee. Helen I. WRZESINSKI, Administrator of the Estate of Walter L. Wrzesinski, Deceased, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Wisconsin Corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 18317, 18318.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 21, 1963.

C. H. Schile, Ryegate, Mont., D. L. Holland and Robert J. Holland, Butte, Mont., for appellants.

Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, and J. C. Garlington, Missoula, Mont., for appellees.

*324Before HAMLIN, JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for damages for wrongful death brought by surviving relatives against Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company as a result of a crossing collision between an automobile in which decedents were riding and a train of appellee. The case was tried before the District Court of Montana sitting without a jury.

Appellants contend that the court’s decision was contrary to the evidence and the law. We do not agree. There was ample evidence to support all of the court’s findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon were proper.

We adopt as our own the excellent detailed opinion of District Judge William J. Jameson before whom the case was tried. 207 F.Supp. 460 (D.C.Montana 1962).

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**  I, Brian Carter, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DIRT Motor Sports, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and    c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.        Date:  August 14, 2007 /s/ Brian Carter   Brian Carter,   Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 109/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 109 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6222 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 109

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6222 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 109/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 109/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 109/02 | State Aid — United Kingdom — State Aid SA.35980 (2018/NN) — Electricity Market Reform: Capacity Mechanism — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2019/C 109/03 | State aid — Denmark — State Aid SA.52162 (2019/C) (ex 2018/FC) — State aid in favour of the Øresund Bridge Consortium — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 46 |
| 2019/C 109/04 | State Aid — Sweden — State Aid SA.52617 (2019/C) (ex 2018/FC) — State aid in favour of the Øresund Bridge Consortium — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 72 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 109/02

State Aid — United Kingdom — State Aid SA.35980 (2018/NN) — Electricity Market Reform: Capacity Mechanism — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

3

2019/C 109/03

State aid — Denmark — State Aid SA.52162 (2019/C) (ex 2018/FC) — State aid in favour of the Øresund Bridge Consortium — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

46

2019/C 109/04

State Aid — Sweden — State Aid SA.52617 (2019/C) (ex 2018/FC) — State aid in favour of the Øresund Bridge Consortium — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

72

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of Sports Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. for the period ended
June 30, 2003:

     1)  Complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sports
Entertainment Enterprises, Inc.



/s/ Voss Boreta
Voss Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Sports Entertainment
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Sports Entertainment Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.