alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DJI Phantom

Pre F light Checklist

Date: H3DS Flight No.:

Serial No : FAA Reg. No .:

ENVIRONMENTAL

☐ Check for people, animals, property in the flight path (500 foot clear zone required)

☐ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner(s) of your intentions

☐ No airport or ARP within 5 miles

☐ Visibility greater than 3 miles from control station

☐ Determine ideal takeoff and landing locations (level ground and safe locations)

☐ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible and visible to anyone in the area.



### HARDWARE/EQUIPMENT

VISUALLY INSPECT THE FRAME

☐ Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints)

☐ Loose or damaged screws, fasteners, bands, straps and/or ties

☐ Loose or damaged wiring

☐ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc.)

☐ Inspect propeller mounts and screws. Apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened

construction

☐ Inspect and clean camera and camera mounts and ens ure they are secured

☐ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated and secured

☐ Propellers are smooth and free of damage/defects (check blade, surface and hubs)

☐ Confirm the model and transmitter are compatible



### PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

☐ DJI Phantom placed on level ground in a safe location for takeoff and landing.

☐ If utilizing onboard camera, turn camera on

☐ All RC transmitter controls move freely in all directions, trims in its neutral position, switches in correct

position and throttle to zero.

☐ Radio transmitter on

☐ Connect power on batter to airframe

☐ Ensure LED indicators and audible tones are all correct

☐ Quickly switch the control mode switch from ATTI to GPS back and forth 6

- 10 times

☐ Pick up the DJI Phantom and rotate around the horizontal axis 360°, until the LED changes to

constant Green

☐ Hold the DJI Phantom vertically and rotate it (its nose is downward) around the vertical axis until the

LED turns off

☐ Scan for nearby people or animals

☐ Stand clear

– audibly, loudly announce the word “CLEAR”

☐ Arm the flight controller



### PRE TAKEOFF CHECKLIST

☐ Turn motors on

☐ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities

☐ Hover at 3

- 5 feet for approximately 30 seconds (observer for any vibrations or abnormal sounds)



### Note abnormalities on PostFlight Checklist

sUAS

- 10 2

- Phantom © Haag 3D Solution, LLC 2015 April 2015
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49892-49893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Office of Information Policy; Attorney General Memorandum for 
Executive Departments and Agencies Concerning the Freedom of 
Information Act

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 21, 2009, the President issued a memorandum for the 
heads of executive departments and agencies on the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA). That memorandum required that the Attorney 
General issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of 
executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to 
accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the 
Federal Register. Pursuant to the President's directive, the Attorney 
General issued new FOIA guidelines on March 19, 2009. Those guidelines 
are now published here.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Ann Pustay, Director, Office 
of Information Policy, U.S. Department of Justice, 1425 New York 
Avenue, NW., Suite 11050, Washington, DC 20009, telephone (202) 514-
3642.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In his January 21, 2009 memorandum on the 
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) the President stated that ``[a]ll 
agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to 
renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher 
in a new era of open Government.'' This memorandum is published in the 
Federal Register at 74 FR 4683-84 and is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/thepress_office/FreedomoflnformationAct/.
    The President also directed the Attorney I General ``to issue new 
guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and 
agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and 
transparency.'' Pursuant to this instruction, the

[[Page 49893]]

Attorney General issued new FOIA guidelines on March 19, 2009; The 
purpose of the Attorney General's memorandum is to underscore the 
FOIA's purpose of providing an open government and to help ensure that 
it is realized in practice. The guidelines provided by the Attorney 
General stress the important implications of the President's call for a 
presumption of openness, emphasize that the FOIA is everyone's 
responsibility, and direct agencies to work proactively and promptly. A 
full text of these guidelines is available on the Department of 
Justice's Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/foia-memo-march2009.pdf. 
Pursuant to the President's instruction, the Attorney General's 
guidelines are also published here.

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
Melanie Ann Pustay,
Director, Office of Information Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23375 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
§ 42.22 Exchange of witness lists, statements, and exhibits. ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other time as may be ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall exchange witness lists, copies of prior statements of proposed witnesses, and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony in accordance with § 42.33(b) of this part. At the time the above documents are exchanged, any party that intends to rely on the transcript of deposition testimony in lieu of live testimony at the hearing, if permitted by the ALJ, shall provide each party with a copy of the specific pages of the transcript it intends to introduce into evidence.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ shall not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to the opposing party as provided above unless the ALJ finds good cause for the failure or that there is no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless another party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
#### § 20.301 Rule 301. Appeals with no request for a Board hearing and no additional evidence.

For appeals in which the appellant requested, on the Notice of Disagreement, direct review by the Board without submission of additional evidence and without a Board hearing, the Board's decision will be based on a review of the evidence of record at the time of the agency of original jurisdiction decision on the issue or issues on appeal.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105, 7107, 7113(a))

[84 FR 182, Jan. 18, 2019]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: February 7,  2006 | /s/ Gerard E.  Puorro                  |   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Gerard E. Puorro                       |
|                         | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.
2 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-2403

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Carlus L. Phillips, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 11, 2010 Filed: January 19, 2010

___________ Before MURPHY and BYE, Circuit Judges, and STROM, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. In 2003, Carlus Phillips pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base (crack cocaine) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841 (b)(1)(B). The district court2sentenced him to 252 months of imprisonment, a sentence which fell near th e top of the applicable Guidelines range of 210-262 months. In 2009, Phillips moved for a reduction in his sentence under 183 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- U.S.C. § 3582(c) based on Amendment 706 to the Guidelines, which reduced the base offense level for crack cocaine offenses by two levels. The ame nded Guidelines range for Phillips's crack cocaine offense thus became 168-210 months. The district court 3 resentenced Phillips to 202 months, selecting a sentence that fell near the top of the amended Guidelines range, proportionally cons istent with the original sentence of 252 months. Phillips appeals his amended sentence c ontending the district court erred by failing to elaborate on its reasons for sel ecting a sentence near the high end of the amended Guidelines range, and by failing to c onsider or explain its application of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
The district court's selection of a sent ence within the amended Guidelines range that was proportionally consistent with th e original sentence, coupled with the discussion of the § 3553(a) factors conducte d in the original sentencing proceeding, sufficiently explain the amended sentence. SeeUnited States v. Clark , 563 F.3d 722, 725 (8th Cir. 2009) (affirming a sentence amended pursuant to § 3582(c) which was near the high end of the amended Guidelin es range, where the original sentence was also at the high end of the Gu idelines range, and where the di strict court at the original sentencing hearing provided an adequate e xplanation of the § 3553(a) factors and gave the reasons for selecting its sentence).
We affirm.

______________________________
§ 23.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 00 30 6 B CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7850-7851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02947]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Extension of Public Comment Period, Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of 
availability and public hearing on December 17, 2014 and a correction 
on December 29, 2014 that provided for a comment period ending March 
19, 2015. DOE is extending the public comment period for the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line 
Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0486) to April 20, 2015.

DATES: DOE extends the public comment period to April 20, 2015. 
Comments submitted to DOE concerning the Plains & Eastern EIS prior to 
this announcement do not need to be resubmitted as a result of this 
extension of the comment period.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the Draft EIS may be provided on the EIS

[[Page 7851]]

Web site at http://www.plainsandeasterneis.com (preferred) or addressed 
to Plains & Eastern EIS, 216 16th Street, Suite 1500, Denver, Colorado 
80202; via email to comments@PlainsandEasternEIS.com; or by facsimile 
to (303) 295-2818. Please mark envelopes and email subject lines as 
Plains & Eastern Draft EIS Comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Summerson, Ph.D., DOE NEPA 
Document Manager on behalf of the Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, NNSA, PO Box 391 
Building 401, Kirtland Air Force Base East, Albuquerque, NM 87185; 
email at Jane.Summerson01@nnsa.doe.gov; or phone (505) 845-4091.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 17, 2014, DOE published a notice 
of availability and public hearing (79 FR 75132) and on December 29, 
2014, DOE published a correction (79 FR 78079) that announced that 
comments on the Plains & Eastern EIS should be submitted within a 90-
day period beginning on December 19, 2014 and ending on March 19, 2015. 
DOE is extending the time allowed for submittal of comments to April 
20, 2015.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 6, 2015.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery 
and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2015-02947 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### William H. Mueller *v.*The Darcey Transportation Company

Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued December 7, 1948—

decided February 1, 1949

*315
      *Ernest W. McCormick,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Warren Maxwell,*for the appellee (defendant).

Maltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff, driving a passenger car in the dusk and with his windshield wiper going because it was misting, overtook and collided with the defendant’s truck part way up a steep hill. His contention was that the truck rolled back on his car, causing the injuries sued for. The trial court held that he was guilty of contributory negligence and rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.

The trial court found these facts: As the truck proceeded up the hill its motor began to sputter and its speed decreased, and the plaintiff, following it, slowed his car but continued to approach the truck until the distance between them was twenty to thirty feet; the plaintiff noticed that the truck was beginning to slow down very perceptibly, but he continued to follow directly behind it. The speed of his car decreased until it was between five and ten miles an hour and the motor began to buck. His car was then twenty feet or less behind the truck and proceeding in high gear. The motor of the truck finally stopped and the truck came to a halt. The plaintiff continued on, and while he was in the process of shifting from high to low gear he crashed into the end of the truck. While the plaintiff attacks certain of these findings, there was evidence before the court which directly or by inference supported them. We cannot hold that the trial court could not reasonably reach the conclusion that the *316plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in that, in view of the way in which the truck was proceeding, he did not have his car in such control that he could, in the exercise of reasonable care, have stopped it so as to avoid the collision, and, proceeding at a speed of only five to ten miles an hour, he did not stop it but continued on until it crashed into the rear of the truck. There is no error.

In this opinion Jennings and Ells, Js., concurred; Dickenson, J., concurred in the result; Brown, J., dissented.
#### § 6.3 Incontestability of United States Government life insurance.

Discharge or release of an insured from military or naval service for the reason of fraudulent enlistment shall not invalidate United States Government life insurance issued on the basis of such service unless the Secretary determines that the insured was mentally or legally incapable of entering into a contract of enlistment. In such case the United States Government life insurance so issued will be canceled as of the effective date of such insurance.

[13 FR 7091, Nov. 27, 1948, as amended at 17 FR 3162, Apr. 10, 1952; 24 FR 7321, Sept. 11, 1959. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29024, 29025, June 7, 1996]
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 27,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert E. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:  | February 5,  2009 |                                                | /s/ Robert E.  Quinn |
|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|   |                   | Robert E. Quinn                                     |
|   |                   | Vice President,  Finance, Treasurer, and            |
|   |                   | Corporate  Controller (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.31 Surveys for recognition and/or certification. ( a ) *General.* Both before and after a home is recognized and certified, VA may survey the home as necessary to determine whether it complies with applicable regulations. VA will provide advance notice before a recognition survey, but advance notice is not required before other surveys. A survey, as necessary, may cover all parts of the home or only certain parts, and may include review, audit, and production of any records that have a bearing on compliance with the requirements of this part (including any reports from state or local entities), as well as the completion and submission to VA of all required forms. The Director will designate the VA officials and/or contractors to survey the home.
( b ) *Recognition surveys.* VA will not conduct a recognition survey unless the following minimum requirements are met: ( 1 ) For nursing homes and domiciliaries, the home has at least 20 residents or has a number of residents consisting of at least 50 percent of the resident capacity of the home;
( 2 ) For adult day health care programs of care, the program has at least 10 participants or has a number of participants consisting of at least 50 percent of participant capacity of the program.
( c ) *Threats to public, resident, or participant safety.* If VA identifies a condition at the home that poses an immediate threat to public, resident or participant safety, or other information indicating the existence of such a threat, the Director of the VA medical center of jurisdiction will immediately report this to the VA Network Director (10N1-22); the Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care in VA Central Office; and the State official authorized to oversee operations of the home.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0160)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                         202,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,296
<INVENTORY>                                    119,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,338
<PP&E>                                         175,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 600,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,193
<BONDS>                                        207,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   600,720
<SALES>                                        459,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,981
<CGS>                                          385,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  385,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    89
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (230)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (352)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  The Newsletter (STAT-USA: Online)
Spring1996,Summer1996,Summer1997,Summer2001, Fall2001,Summer2002,Summer2003,Fall2003,Winter2003, Summer2004

 
SuDoc:C 1.91/2:������� 
�Item Number:0128-P (online)
CGP system Number:000463295