alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION** 

**WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION** 

FAA Order No. 2015
- 8 FDMS No. FAA
- 2013
- 0851 1 Served: October 27 , 2015 **ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL** 2 By notice served on October 23, 2015, Complainant withdrew its cross
- appeal of the initial decision issued by

Administrative L aw Judge Richard C. Goodwin on July 27, 2015. Complainant represented that it was withdrawing its appeal pursuant to a settlement agreement. THERE FORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Complainant’s appeal is dismissed.
M IC HAE L P. HUERTA, ADMINISTRATOR Federal Aviation Administration [Original signed b y Vicki S. Leemon] VI CKIS. LEEMON 3 Manager, Adjudication Branch

1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA H earing Docket are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(1).

2 The Administrator’s civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of practice, and other information, are available on the Internet at the following address: www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/AGC400/Civil_Penalty/. See 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions . Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRAN
FAA database). For additional information, see the Web site.

3 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redelegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

###### Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting, #1170.                    

*Date/Time:*                         October 21, 2009: 12:00 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. October 22, 2009: 8:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.                    

*Agenda:*                         The principal focus of the meeting on both days will be to discuss emerging issues and opportunities for the Directorate for Engineering and its divisions and review Committee of Visitors Reports.                    

      ( print page 50258)    
Dated: September 25, 2009.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-23544 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
### SERVED: 

### JUNE 29,2012

-- - 

### -- -**~** ,.,. -.**~.--.-**

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OFHEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### MESA AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKET No. CP05SW0018 (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2005-22891



### ---------------------------------------------- ORDER OFDISMISSAL On October 25, 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. On October 19, 2005, MesaAirlines ("Respondent") hadrequested a hearing. Bymotion dated .(une 28, 2012, Respondent filed a Withdrawal oLRequest for Hearing and moved to dismiss this proceeding, citing settlement ofthe matter in the context ofthereorganization in bankruptcy ofRespondent and its parent company, Mesa Air Group, Inc. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for_a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge
..Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." · WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing having been read and considered, it is .ORDERED that:
. ?· 

### ! ") I_'_,• _)2
1. 

### Respondent's Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing is hereby GRANTED; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED.

Attachments

- Service List

# f.tMC_GwL_~ · 1chard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge 

## ..FAA DocketNo. CP05SW0018 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building

- Room 2014 1
Christopher Pappaioanou Director, Legal Affairs Mesa Air Group 410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85008 TEL: (602) 685-4000 FAX: (602) 685-4350 Annjenet Chennault, Attorney Safety Enforcement Branch Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 TEL: (817) 222-5071 FAX: (817) 222-5092/5946 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 "' U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor (202) 366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: (202) 366-7536 

# ..

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3704 — CVC/Mivisa)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 44/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
#### § 6.4 Proof of age, relationship and marriage.

Whenever it is necessary for a claimant to prove age, relationship or marriage, the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 103(c) and Part 3 this chapter will be followed.

[26 FR 1856, Mar. 3, 1961. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29024, 29025, June 7, 1996]
|   |   |                                         |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                         |   |
|   |   | /s/ James R. Heistand                   |   |
|   |   | James R. Heistand (*)                        |   |
|   |   | Chairman, Board of DirectorsNovember 8, 2011 |   |
|   |   |                                         |   |

| * | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
126 STAT. 330 PUBLIC LAW 112–109—MAY 15, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2079: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Feb. 14, 15, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–109 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 Main 

Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

Approved May 15, 2012. 

May 15, 2012 

[H.R. 2079] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
41711, 41712.

#### TEEMS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (two cases).

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiffs in these cases appeal from judgments of the trial court granting the defendant’s motions for summary judgment.

The defendant issued to Gail Teems, the plaintiffs’ daughter, an automobile liability insurance policy. The policy excluded from coverage for bodily injury liability, “bodily injury to the insured or any member of the family of the insured residing in the same household as the insured.” The insured’s *54mother and father obtained judgments for damages against the insured in actions alleging that the mother was injured while a passenger in an automobile because of its negligent operation by the insured. The defendant refused to defend the suits and to pay the judgments. The following evidence was presented on the motions for summary judgment: At the time of the occurrence out of which the suits arose the insured was 18 years old and was living in the residence of her mother and father and younger sister, where all of them had lived for about 4 years. The insured occupied one of the three bedrooms in the house. Since she graduated from high school two years earlier and started to work the insured had paid rent to her father of $5 a week and paid for a telephone extension to her room. She continued to have use of the house and the family relationship continued to be the same except that the insured was free to do as she pleased; she went where she wanted to and was not disciplined or told by her father what to do; she owned her own automobile, bought her own clothes and paid her own medical bills and expenses. *Held:*

Submitted January 6, 1966

Decided January 28, 1966.

*Glenn T. York, Jr., James I. Parker,*for appellants.

*Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Wade C. Hoyt, Jr.,*for appellee.

The issue presented in these cases was decided by this court in *Morris v. State Farm Mut. &c. Ins. Co.,*88 Ga. App. 844, 848 (78 SE2d 354). Cf. *Varnadoe v. State Farm Mut. &c. Ins. Co.,*112 Ga. App. 366 (145 SE2d 104); see Anno. 50 ALR2d 120. The plaintiffs in the present cases, the mother and father of the insured, were members of the family residing in the same household as the insured.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 CITY OF ROSWELL, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. No. 34,829 4 OLGA FUENTES, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY 7 James M. Hudson, District Judge 8 Paul V. Sanchez 9 Roswell, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jesse R. Cosby, P.C. 12 Jesse R. Cosby 13 Roswell, NM 14 for Appellant 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 HANISEE, Judge. 172 {1} Defendant appeals her conviction for violating a City of Roswell municipal 1 ordinance that outlaws obstructing a peace o fficer while the officer is in the lawful 2 performance of his duties. We issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to 3 affirm, and Defendant has f iled a response indicating she has decided not to challenge 4 the Court’s proposed affirmance. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of 5 proposed disposition, we affi rm Defendant’s conviction. 6
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

8 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 9

WE CONCUR: 10

11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 12

13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                          10,597
<SECURITIES>                                    29,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (162)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,998
<PP&E>                                          20,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,602
<SALES>                                         36,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,175
<CGS>                                           23,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (465)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,231)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
<FN>
<F1>Net of interest income and interest expense
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1
       
<S>                                              <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                                298301
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         137539
<ALLOWANCES>                                           88969
<INVENTORY>                                            16635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      382026
<PP&E>                                                286469
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (268829)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        506475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 137702
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                               42880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                            325893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          506475
<SALES>                                               697677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      701893
<CGS>                                                 209580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         209580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      464871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        27442
<INCOME-TAX>                                            4116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    23326
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           23326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .005
        

</TABLE>
§ 62.21 Threshold requirements prior to scoring supportive services grant applicants. VA will only score applicants that meet the following threshold requirements: ( a ) The application is filed within the time period established in the Notice of Fund Availability, and any additional information or documentation requested by VA under § 62.20(c) is provided within the time frame established by VA;
( b ) The application is completed in all parts;
( c ) The applicant is an eligible entity;
( d ) The activities for which the supportive services grant is requested are eligible for funding under this part;
( e ) The applicant's proposed participants are eligible to receive supportive services under this part;
( f ) The applicant agrees to comply with the requirements of this part;
( g ) The applicant does not have an outstanding obligation to the Federal government that is in arrears and does not have an overdue or unsatisfactory response to an audit; and
( h ) The applicant is not in default by failing to meet the requirements for any previous Federal assistance.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2044)
J.

State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

To the extent that appellant sought to modify his sentence, appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was outside the scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Juan Fernando Lopez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4' 1 2
300 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.  Bldg 1 Tempe, AZ 85281 Office: 602.852.6604 Exhibit 33.6 Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria 1. Carvana, LLC ( “Carvana”), as sponsor and administrator, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all publicly-registered asset-backed securities transactions for which Carvana acted as sponsor and administrator involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platform are set forth in Appendix A hereto. 2. Carvana used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All other servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to Carvana based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 4. Carvana has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Carvana’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period. March 29, 2023 Carvana, LLC By: Name: Paul W. Breaux Title: Vice President, Secretary /s/ Paul W. Breaux
 2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3  Appendix A
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Prime contract awards, sizedistribution [electronic resource].**
 
1975 | 1977 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.57/3-5:
Item Number:0310-E-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000544391
 
January 28, 2020