alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2006 to 30 September 2006

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) )

(2006/C 259/04)

—   Issuing of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

—   Issuing of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Rejected

—   Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

—   Issuing of a marketing authorization (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:

----

(1)OJ L 136 of 30 April 2004, page 1.

----
#  Notice of September 21, 2009—Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism 

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, the President declared a national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). The President took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, in New York and Pennsylvania and against the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks against United States nationals or the United States. Because the actions of persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States, the national emergency declared on September 23, 2001, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 23, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                        and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. E9-23055

Billing code 3195-W9-P
§ 61.10 Capital grants—general. ( a ) Subject to the availability of appropriations provided for such purpose, VA will provide capital grants to public or nonprofit private entities so they can assist homeless veterans by helping to ensure the availability of supportive housing and service centers to furnish outreach, rehabilitative services, and vocational counseling and training. Specifically, VA provides capital grants for up to 65 percent of the cost to: ( 1 ) Construct structures and purchase the underlying land to establish new supportive housing facilities or service centers, or to expand existing supportive housing facilities or service centers;
( 2 ) Acquire structures to establish new supportive housing facilities or service centers, or to expand existing supportive housing facilities or service centers;
( 3 ) Renovate existing structures to establish new supportive housing facilities or service centers, or to expand existing supportive housing facilities or service centers; and
( 4 ) Procure a van in accordance with § 61.18, Capital grants for vans.
( b ) Capital grants may not be used for acquiring buildings located on VA-owned property. However, capital grants may be awarded for construction, expansion, or renovation of buildings located on VA-owned property.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2011)
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 31, 2022 | By:    | /s/ James Bond                                                                    |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | James Bond                                                                        |
|                 |   | President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Mike McKeever, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be providedunder Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of thereports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation and Computershare Trust Company, National Association. 

Date: March 25, 2022 

 

/s/ Mike McKeever
Mike McKeeverPresidentCarvana Receivables Depositor LLC(senior officer in charge of securitization)**
§ 6.11 How dividends are paid. ( a ) Regular annual dividends becoming payable on or after December 31, 1958, shall be payable on the date preceding the anniversary of the policy unless the Secretary shall declare them payable on some other date.
( b ) If the insured has a National Service Life Insurance policy or policies in force, dividends used to pay premiums in advance will be held to the credit of the insured, unless otherwise directed by the insured.
( c ) In the event premiums on more than one policy having the same premium due date are unpaid and the dividend credit of the insured for application to payment of premiums is not sufficient to keep all policies in force, in the absence of instructions to the contrary by the insured, such dividend credit will be applied to pay premiums in such manner as will provide the maximum amount of insurance protection.
( d ) Dividend credit of the insured held for payment of premiums as provided in section 1946 of title 38 U.S.C., may not be used to satisfy any indebtedness due the United States without the insured's consent. If the insured requests payment of such dividend credit, or any unused portion thereof, in cash, or requests that such credit be left to accumulate on deposit, then any indebtedness due the United States, such as described in § 6.7 will be recovered therefrom.
( e ) Dividend credit of the insured held for payment of premiums or dividends left to accumulate on deposit may be applied to the payment of premiums in advance on any National Service Life Insurance policy upon written request of the insured made before default in payment of premium. Upon maturity of the policy, any unpaid dividend will be paid to the person(s) currently entitled to receive payments under the policy.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1944)
[24 FR 15, Jan. 1, 1959, as amended at 25 FR 7369, Aug. 5, 1960; 28 FR 12544, Nov. 23, 1963; 32 FR 13927, Oct. 6, 1967; 48 FR 1962, Jan. 17, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00737

Removed from 

Public (Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 00737\00737_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00737\00737_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00737\00737_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00737\00737_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00737\00737_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00737\00737_PartB.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00737\00737_PartC.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00737\00737_PartD.XLS Plant submitted survey file

00737\Certification Statement_00737.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00737\Supplemental Documents\00737 Part C Revisions.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00737\Supplemental Documents\00737_email.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

00737\Supplemental Documents\00737_Section A Documents.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x (duplicate) 00737\Supplemental Documents\00737_Water Sec A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
### Good Neighbor Environmental Board

May 25, 2010

Dear friends and colleagues,

The Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) will issue its thirteenth report, entitled A

Blueprint for Action on the US - Mexico Border

, on June 17, at the Woodrow Wilson Center in

Washington, DC. We would be honored if yo u would join our distinguished speakers and

other guests at this event, which is cosponsore d with the Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute.

GNEB is an independent advisory committee that reports to the President and Congress on

environmental issues along the U.S.–Mexico border . In this report, the Board responds to the

charge set by the Council on Environmental Qua lity to develop actionable recommendations on

a wide range of environmental issues. An agenda for the event is attached.

Thursday, June 17, 3:00-5:30 p.m.

Fifth-floor conference room

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

One Woodrow Wilson Plaza

1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20004

Please RSVP by June 11 by emailing Ann-Marie Gantner at:

Gantner.Ann-Marie@epa.gov, or by calling (202) 564-4330.

If you have any questions, please contact Dolores Wesson at:

wesson.dolores@epa.gov

We look forward to your participation.

Paul Ganster Dolores Wesson Andrew Selee

Chair Designated Federal Officer Director, Mexico Institute

# G OOD 

# N EIGHBOR 

# E NVIRONMENTAL 

# B OARD

F IFTH

- FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM

W OODROW W ILSON I NTERNATIONAL C ENTER FOR S CHOLARS

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

One Woodrow Wilson Plaza

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

June 17, 2010

OVERVIEW OF REPORT

(3:00-4:00 PM)

Welcome and Introductions

Dolores Wesson, EPA and Designated Federal Officer, GNEB

Paul Ganster, San Diego State University and Chair, GNEB

Council on Environmental Quality

Nancy Sutley, Chair CEQ

Environmental Protection Agency

Michelle DePass, Assist ant Administrator, OITA

United States of Mexico

Enrique Escorza, Head of Section Political and Border Affairs

Questions and answers from the press and the public

R OUNDTABLE D ISCUSSION : A F EDERAL

, S TATE AND L OCAL S TAKEHOLDER P ERSPECTIVE

(4:00-5:30PM)

M ODERATOR : Duncan Wood, Director, Department of International Relations, Instituto Tecnólogico Autónomo de

México (ITAM); Senior Associate, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS); and Senior Advisor,

Renewable Energy Initiative, Woodrow Wilson Center

Department of State, Of fice of Mexican Affairs

Russell Frisbie, Washington Liaison, IBWC

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Steve Niemeyer, Manager for Border Affairs

Gila Resources Information Project, New Mexico

Allyson Siwik , Executive Director

Sonora Environmental Rese arch Institute, Arizona

Ann Marie A. Wolf, President

Cameron County, Texas

John Wood, County Commissioner, Precinct 2
#### Albert E. Rose, Respondent, *v.*Winifred Wallace, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff.

*773H. 0. Wingate, for appellant.

Morris Cukor, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

There is sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment.

Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Teuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
## Grand Canyon NP

Bookmark this report: https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/SSRSReports/Park Specific Reports/Annual Park Visitation (All Years)?Park=GRCA

YearRecreation Visitors 1919 37,745 1920 67,315 1921 67,485 1922 84,700 1923 102,166 1924 108,256 1925 134,053 1926 140,252 1927 162,356 1928 167,226 1929 184,093 1930 172,763 1931 156,964 1932 121,267 1933 105,475 1934 140,220 1935 206,018 1936 268,412 1937 297,876 1938 336,557 1939 395,940 1940 371,613 1941 436,566 1942 132,584 1943 71,650 1944 64,568 1945 169,960 1946 486,834 1947 622,363 1948 618,033 1949 600,690 1950 665,039 1951 682,152 1952 737,159

Annual Park Visitation (All Years) Page 1 of 3 1/8/2013 12:20:23 PMYearRecreation Visitors 1953 836,878 1954 814,700 1955 892,400 1956 1,033,700 1957 1,102,400 1958 1,064,000 1959 1,169,400 1960 1,187,700 1961 1,253,000 1962 1,447,400 1963 1,539,500 1964 1,576,600 1965 1,689,200 1966 1,806,000 1967 1,804,900 1968 1,986,300 1969 2,192,600 1970 2,258,200 1971 2,402,100 1972 2,698,300 1973 1,909,700 1974 1,888,600 1975 2,625,100 1976 2,791,600 19772,627,200 1978 2,748,642 1979 2,131,716 1980 2,304,973 1981 2,472,270 1982 2,293,127 1983 2,248,082 19842,173,584 1985 2,711,529 1986 3,035,787 1987 3,513,030 1988 3,859,886 1989 3,966,209

Annual Park Visitation (All Years) Page 2 of 3 1/8/2013 12:20:23 PMYearRecreation Visitors 1990 3,776,685 1991 3,886,031 1992 4,203,545 19934,575,602 19944,364,316 1995 4,557,645 1996 4,537,703 19974,510,251 19974,791,668 1998 4,239,682 1999 4,575,124 2000 4,460,228 2001 4,104,809 2002 4,001,974 20034,124,900 20044,326,234 2005 4,401,522 2006 4,279,439 20074,413,668 2008 4,425,314 2009 4,348,068 2010 4,388,386 2011 4,298,178 Total184,763,635

Annual Park Visitation (All Years) Page 3 of 3 1/8/2013 12:20:23 PM
Before Beekman, P. J., and Giegerich, J.

#### Benjamin D. Traitel et al., Respondents, v. Thomas Dwyer, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the City of New York, affirming a judgment against defendant, entered upon a verdict.

Hardy & Shellabarger (Charles J. Hardy, of counsel), for Appellant; M. S. &I. S. Isaacs (Julius J Frank, of counsel), for Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                 
<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                    1,527,000 
<SECURITIES>                                      0 
<RECEIVABLES>                             2,941,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                250,000 
<INVENTORY>                               2,788,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          7,617,000 
<PP&E>                                    8,465,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,429,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            9,745,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,431,000 
<BONDS>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                    465,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0 
<PREFERRED>                                       0 
<OTHER-SE>                               11,154,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              9,745,000 
<SALES>                                   7,712,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          7,712,000 
<CGS>                                     6,353,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             6,353,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,171,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          113,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (925,000) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0 
<CHANGES>                                         0 
<NET-INCOME>                              (925,000) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.21) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.21) 
                                               
                                                    
                                       

</TABLE>
#### LeFever Adoption

*John P. Campana,*for petitioner.

October 19, 1956.

Williams, P. J.,

Carl L. LeFever divorced Edith Mae LeFever on May 17, 1954, the union producing Sandra Pauline LeFever, age 9 years, Barry Lee LeFever, age 7 years, and Rickey LeFever, age 6 years.

He remarried on August 30, 1955, and it was verbally agreed that he have custody of the three children.

He now has petitioned this court for the adoption of the three children by himself and his second wife. The *46mother, Edith M. LeFever, objects to the adoption and will not give her consent.

It has been held a valid decree of adoption cannot be made without consent of the parents where there is no specific finding that the parents had abandoned the children sought to be adopted: Petition of Sulewski, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 301. The welfare of the children sought to be adopted will not authorize a decree of adoption unless there is consent or unless there has been abandonment.

In the instant case, there is no abandonment. There was an arrangement whereby the father of the children was to have custody. There has been an effort to show that the mother did not visit the children. Even if the court were to find that her actions were such, this would not be sufficient to show abandonment.

We are of the opinion that in the circumstances of this case the consent of the natural mother is necessary.

*Order*

And now, October 19, 1956, the request for adoption is refused; costs on petitioners.
#### Leonard C. Ketchum, Respondent, *v.*Milo M. Belding, Jr., Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

May, 1900.)

Lloyd’s insurance — The defense that the attorney was not sued before the underwriters must be pleaded.

The defense, to an action upon a Lloyd’s insurance policy, that, contrary to its stipulations, action has been brought against an individual underwriter before any action had been brought against the attorneys for the underwriters, is in the nature of a pleading in abatement and is not available unless it has been pleaded.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial

Lexow, Mackellar & Wells (Clarence Lexow and George M. Mackellar, of counsel), for appellant " _"

Donald McLean and Albert [Ritchie, for respondent

Eirzsyvrons, Ch. J.

This action is on a Lloyd’s fire insurance policy, the defendant and about fourteen other persons being underwriters. The policy provided that no action should be begun under it against the individual underwriters or any of them “ until after suit shall have been brought against the attorneys for the underwriters and for the full amount of the loss or claim,” and each of the underwriters agreed to abide the final determination of any such action, so fixing his individual responsibility under this policy. It is admitted that no such action was brought against said attorneys who are named in the policy and who are also underwriters. The defendant, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, moved to dis*499miss the complaint upon the ground that action had not been brought against the attorneys for the underwriters as trustees, as provided for in the policy, and that, until such action was brought and judgment recovered thereon and execution returned unsatisfied, no cause of action accrued against the defendant as an underwriter under the policy. This motion was denied and was renewed at the close of the defendant’s testimony and was again denied. Judgment was directed in plaintiff’s favor by the court for $395.99 and due exception was taken by defendant. The answer does not set up as a defense the question just mentioned, and, therefore, the motion for a dismissal of the complaint was properly denied. Such a defense is in the nature of a plea in abatement, which should give the names of the parties omitted and show that they are alive and within the jurisdiction of the court and within reach of its process, and should be full, clear and specific. Ralli v. White, 21 Misc. Rep. 291.

The judgment was a just and fair one and must be affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
SERVED: August 13, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MEYER LABORATORY, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0618 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013-GL-70-0054) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon A venue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

Terry Oles, Vice President of Operations 

Meyer Laboratory, Inc., Respondent 

2401 NW Jefferson Street 

Blue Springs, MO 64015 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0618 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-