alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Malacha (QF)

16 MW, Hydro

Rocklin (QF)

12 MW, Biomass

Chinese Station (QF)

9 MW, Biomass

Fresno (QF)

12 MW, Biomass

Poso (QF)

18 MW, Coal

Jasmin (QF)

18 MW, Coal

ACE (QF)

32 MW, Coal

SEGS IV,V,VI (QF)

8 MW, Solar

A/C Fuels

Panther Creek (QF)

40 MW, Waste Coal

Safe Harbor (EWG)

278 MW, Hydro

Baltimore Plants

3,665 MW, Coal, Gas, Oil

(see inset, below)

Calvert Cliffs

853 MW, Nuclear

Sunnyside (QF)

26 MW, Waste Coal

West Valley

200 MW, 5 CT’s, Gas

Handsome Lake

268 MW, 5 CTs, Gas

R. E. Ginna

291 MW, Nuclear

Nine Mile Point

777 MW, Nuclear

Quail Run (CC)

550 MW, Gas

Hillabee

740 MW, 2x1 CC, Gas

Updated September 9, 2010 by the Constellation Energy Commercial Analysis Group

Please contact Print & Digital Media Services at http://myconstellation/portal/site/pdms for copies of this map.

Grande Prairie

93 MW, CT, Gas

Notch Cliff

Riverside

Gould Street

Brandon Shores

Perryman

C.P. Crane

Westport

Wagner

Philadelphia 

Road

BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE COUNTY HARFORD COUNTY

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

BALTIMORE PLANTS

Constellation Energy Generation Assets Portfolio

8,950 MW in Operation • 70 MW Under Construction

Keystone (EWG)

357 MW, Coal

2 MW, Oil

Colver (QF)

26 MW, Waste Coal

Conemaugh (EWG)

180 MW, Coal

1 MW, Oil

Eastern Plant Fuel Processing Plant

Western Plant Under Construction

Nuclear Plant Brandon Shores 1, 2 1,273 MW Coal

Wagner 1-4, CT 440 MW Coal (2, 3)

126 MW Gas/Oil (1)

397 MW Oil (4)

13 MW Oil CT

C.P. Crane 1, 2, CT 385 MW Coal (1, 2)

14 MW Oil CT

Riverside 4, 6, 7, 8 74 MW Gas Steam (4)

115 MW Gas/Oil CT (6)

39 MW Oil CT (7, 8)

Westport 5 116 MW Gas CT

Gould Street 97 MW Gas

Philadelphia Road 1-4 61 MW Oil CT

Notch Cliff 1-8 104 MW Gas CT

Perryman 1-4, 51 199 MW Oil CT (1-4)

148 MW Gas/Oil CT (51)

Criterion

70 MW, Wind

Colorado Bend (CC)

550 MW, Gas
Exhibit 4.110


 


Maximum Pledge Contract


 


Contract No.: TL1400018P


 


Pledgor : Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing
Co., Ltd. 


 


Pledgee : China Minsheng Bank Shijiazhuang
Branch 


 


Signing Date : August 4, 2014


 


Pledge Definition : To ensure multiple loans Party B (Pledgee) has
lent to Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd, Party A (Pledgor)


is willing to provide the Maximum Pledge Guarantee hereunder for
Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB105,000,000


 


Pledge Term : From August 4, 2014 to August 4, 2016
EX-10.65



 Exhibit 10.65 
  

			
	



		  
 111 Eighth Avenue

		7th Floor
		New York, NY 10011
		212.624.3700

 As of November 14, 2012 

Michael Glick 
 c/o WebMD Health Corp. 

111 Eighth Avenue 
 New York, NY 10011-5201 

Dear Mike: 
 Reference is made to the grant of a
nonqualified option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock made to you on November 14, 2012 (the “2012 Option”) as evidenced by the Option Agreement dated November 14, 2012 (the “Option
Agreement”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Option Agreement, in the event of the termination of your employment by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in your Letter
Agreement with the Company dated as of February 11, 2011), in either case within twelve (12) months following a Change of Control of WebMD (as defined in the WebMD Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan), the 2012 Option, to
the extent unvested, shall remain outstanding and continue to vest as if you remained in the employ of the Company until the first anniversary of such date of termination, subject to a release of claims (as described your Letter Agreement) being
executed by you and becoming effective and your continued compliance with the restrictive covenant agreements you have signed in connection with your employment. 

Except as set forth herein, the Option Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Douglas W. Wamsley

	Douglas W. Wamsley
	EVP-General Counsel
	
	Agreed to:
	
	 /s/ Michael Glick

	Michael Glick
§ 77.3 Grants—general. ( a ) *Grants.* VA may award adaptive sports grants to eligible entities.
( b ) *Maximum amount.* The maximum grant amounts to be awarded will be specified in the NOFA.
( c ) *No matching requirement.* A grantee will not be required to provide matching funds as a condition of receiving such grant.
( d ) *Participants will not be charged.* A grantee may not charge participants a fee for providing adaptive sports activities that were outlined in their adaptive sports grant application.
( e ) *Grant is not veteran's benefit.* The grant offered by this chapter is not a veteran's benefit. As such, the decisions of the Secretary are final and not subject to the same appeal rights as decisions related to veterans benefits.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 521A)
#### § 1010.6 One hundred lot exemption.

The sale of lots in a subdivision is exempt from the registration requirements of the Act if, since April 28, 1969, the subdivision has contained fewer than 100 lots, exclusive of lots which are exempt from jurisdiction under § 1010.5. In the sale of lots in the subdivision that are not exempt under § 1010.5, the developer must comply with the Act's anti-fraud provisions, set forth in § 1010.4(b) and (c).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc.,
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act 2002, that: 1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 /s/ Robert S. Kendall  
 12
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.435 Nursing services. The State home must provide an organized nursing service with a sufficient number of qualified nursing personnel to meet the total nursing care needs, as determined by participant assessments and individualized comprehensive care plans, of all participants in the program. ( a ) There must be at least one registered nurse on duty each day of operation of the adult day health care program. This nurse must be currently licensed by the State and must have, in writing, administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability for the functions, activities, and training of the nursing and program assistants.
( b ) The number and level of nursing staff is determined by the authorized capacity of participants and the nursing care needs of the participants.
( c ) Nurse staffing must be adequate for meeting the standards of this part.
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0738

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

AMBER MARIE BURNETT,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

This cause, which was previously classified for submission on briefs to a five-justice 

panel, is hereby reclassified for submission to the Court sitting en banc. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 12 2022

01/12/2022

Case Number: DA 19-0738
§ 1010.215 Subdivision characteristics and climate. ( a ) Submit a copy of a current geological survey topographic map, or maps, of the largest scale available from the U.S. Geological Survey with an outline of the entire subdivision and the area included in this Statement of Record clearly indicated. Do not shade the areas on the maps which have been outlined.
( b ) If drainage facilities are proposed but not yet completed, submit a synopsis of the developer's proposed plans that includes a description of the system of collecting surface waters; a description of the steps to be taken to control erosion and sedimentation and the estimated cost of the drainage facilities.
( c ) Submit copies of any bonds, escrow or trust accounts or other financial assurance of completion of the drainage facilities.
( d ) State whether the jurisdiction in which the subdivision is located has a system for rating the land for fire hazards.
[76 FR 79489, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 29117, May 11, 2016]
Certificate of Correction of Middlesex Water Company



 Exhibit 4.3 
  

CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION 
 OF

 MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY 
  

	To:	  	 Secretary of State
 State of New
Jersey


  
 The Undersigned,
hereby submits for filing, a Certificate of Correction, executed on behalf of the above-named Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Section 14A:1-6(5) Corporations, General, of the New Jersey Statutes. 
  

	 	1.	The Certificate to be corrected is: 

  

	 Document

	 	 Filing Date


	Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Middlesex Water Company	 	June 10, 1998

  

	 	2.	The inaccuracies in the Certificate are: 

  

	 	a.	Section 2 includes materials not intended for inclusion in the Certificate of Incorporation. 

  

	 	b.	Part of Section 2 erroneously recites the proposed amendment as: 

  
 “The total authorized capital stock of the Company is 10,169,418, divided into 10,000,000 shares of common stock without nominal or par value, 69,418
shares of preferred stock without nominal or par value (out of 100,000 shares of preferred stock originally authorized) and 100,000 shares of preference stock without nominal or par value.” 








	 	3.	This Certificate of Correction provides (consistent with the amendment voted on by the Corporation’s shareholders) that the first sentence of Article 7A of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation hereby reads as follows: 

  
 “ARTICLE 7A. The total authorized capital stock of the Company is 10,249,980 shares, divided into 10,000,000 shares of common stock without nominal or par value, 149,980 shares of preferred stock without nominal or par value and
100,000 shares of preference stock without nominal or par value.” 
  
 Dated
this 28th day of April, 1999. 
  

	 MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/    MARION F. REYNOLDS

	 	 	

	 	 	 Marion F. Reynolds

	 	 	 Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
**Exhibit 99-2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Bradley D. Wiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 960 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Bradley D. Wiley |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Bradley D. Wiley          |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 14, 2002         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEETS AND CASH FLOWS OF FHP
INTERNATIONAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DECEMBER 31,
1996 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         297,815
<SECURITIES>                                   226,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,027
<INVENTORY>                                      8,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               766,433
<PP&E>                                         396,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 164,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,210,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          802,259
<BONDS>                                        100,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    525,793
<COMMON>                                       431,093
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,210,825
<SALES>                                      2,207,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,207,042
<CGS>                                        2,130,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,130,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
        

</TABLE>
715 A.2d 961

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Anthony E. WALLER.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 49,

Sept. Term, 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 19, 1998.

ORDER

The Court having considered the Consent to Suspension pursuant to Rule 16-716 filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission and Anthony E. Waller, the respondent, it is this 18th day of August, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED and the respondent, Anthony E. Waller, is suspended by consent from the practice of law in Maryland pending further order of this Court, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anthony E. Waller from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
## 2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
8-4-2004 

# I n Re: Glob al T

i s s ue P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-2311

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du . 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" I n Re: Glo b al Ti s s ue " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 419. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/419

## TH E U NIT ED STA TES CO UR T O F A PPE AL S FO R T HE TH IRD CIR CU IT July29, 2004 No. 03-2311 In Re: Global Tissue United States District Court of Delaware (02-cv- 01324) Pre sen t: RO SE NN , Circuit Judge Motion by Appell ee to Amend the Opinion f iled on July7, 2004.

Charlene Cri sden 267-299-4923

O R D E R The motion

to amend t

he opinion

in the above matter

to reflect that the

counsel f or appellee is Christ opher P. Si mon, Cross & Simon, 913 Market St reet, P.O. Box 1380, Suite 1001, Wilmington, DE 19899-1380 is grant ed.

By the C ourt, /s/ Max Rosenn Circuit Judge Date: August 4, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,624
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     (17,764)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (9,624)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0






</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0190 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-188-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2012-0211

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date