alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 393/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 393 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5826 November 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 393

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5826 November 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 393/1 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7691 — Apollo/OMG) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 393/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7691 — Apollo/OMG) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 393/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 393/3 | Value added tax (VAT) — Exempt investment gold — List of gold coins meeting the criteria established in Article 344(1), point (2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (special scheme for investment gold) — Valid for the year 2016 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 393/2

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 393/3

Value added tax (VAT) — Exempt investment gold — List of gold coins meeting the criteria established in Article 344(1), point (2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (special scheme for investment gold) — Valid for the year 2016

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 393/4 | Information notice — Public consultation — Geographical indications from Japan | 30 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 393/4

Information notice — Public consultation — Geographical indications from Japan

30

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 4.1

                 COMPENSATION AGREEMENT WITH GREGORY J. CHACHAS.


                               Gregory J. Chachas
                              174 Dorchester Drive
                            Sale Lake City Utah 84103


                                  June 9, 1999
Mr. George G. Cachas
Wenthur & Chachas
4180 La Jolla Village Drive
Suite 500
La Jolla, CA 92067

Re: Covingham Capital Coprp
Acceptance Appointment as director and Officer

Dear George:

As we discussed I accept the appointment as a director and the Vice President of
Covingham Capital corp. Further, as the corporation has limited cash resources,
I agree to accept shares of the common stock as payment director, advisory and
legal services provided to the corporation from time to time.

Sincerely,


/s/ Gregory J Chachas
Gregory J. Chachas
# Official Journal C 65A/25 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6425 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6425 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 65 A/01 | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (Luxembourg) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) COM/2021/20056 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 65 A/01

Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (Luxembourg) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) COM/2021/20056

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 18, 2023 

S 

In the 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00798-CV 

IN RE CARLOS ENRIQUE LORDUY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-23-08291 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Carlyle 

Before the Court is relator’s August 15, 2023 “Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction,” which we construe as a petition for writ of injunction. Relator asks this 

Court to (1) “grant a preliminary injunction ordering the immediate return of [a] 

child to” relator’s custody pending the resolution of the underlying case and 

(2) “investigate the circumstances surrounding the denial of visitation and to ensure 

the child’s safety and well-being moving forward.” 

A petition for a writ of injunction filed in an appellate court must comply with 

the requirements of rule 52. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a) (“Each court of 

appeals . . . may issue . . . all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the 
 –2– 

court.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“An original proceeding seeking extraordinary 

relief—such as [an] . . . injunction . . . —is commenced by filing a petition with the 

clerk of the appropriate appellate court.”). 

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure in numerous respects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, 52.3(a)–(h), (j)–(k), 

52.7(a). For instance, relator’s petition is not certified. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j); 

In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). The 

petition is also not supported by an appendix or record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1); Butler, 270 S.W.3d at 759. Relator bears the burden of 

providing the Court with a sufficient record to show he is entitled to relief. Walker v. 

Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Without a certified 

petition and appendix or record, relator has not carried his burden. See Butler, 270 

S.W.3d at 758–59. 

Additionally, to the extent relator seeks injunctive relief, this Court has 

authority to “issue a writ of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce the 

jurisdiction of the court.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). Relator has an appeal 

pending in this Court in Case No. 05-23-00625-CV. But relator’s requested 

injunctive relief is not necessary to enforce this Court’s jurisdiction in relator’s 

pending appeal, and relator otherwise asserts no appropriate reason for us to enter 

injunctive relief. 
 –3– 

To the extent relator asks this Court to conduct an investigation, our original 

jurisdiction does not include jurisdiction to conduct such investigations. See TEX.

CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221. 

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction. 

230798F.P05 

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
§ 46.5 National Practitioner Data Bank inquiries. VA will request information from the National Practitioner Data Bank, in accordance with the regulations published at 45 CFR part 60, subpart C, as applicable, concerning a physician, dentist, or other licensed health care practitioner as follows: ( a ) At the time a physician, dentist, or other health care practitioner applies for a position at VA Central Office, any of its regional offices, or on the medical staff, or for clinical privileges at a VA hospital or other health care entity operated under the auspice of VA;
( b ) No less often than every 2 years concerning any physician, dentist, or other health care practitioner who is on the medical staff or who has clinical privileges at a VA hospital or other health care entity operated under the auspice of VA; and
( c ) At other times pursuant to VA policy and needs and consistent with the Act and Department of Health and Human Services Regulations (45 CFR part 60).
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Harary
    Joseph M. Harary
    President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
    May 7, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>           SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                   778,395
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             15,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         796,098
<PP&E>                                                 4,176,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,464,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         5,229,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    165,072
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             5,064,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           5,229,259
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,255,946
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            750,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          505,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      505,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             505,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 468/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 468 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5731 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 468

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5731 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 468/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 468/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 468/02 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 2 |
| 2014/C 468/03 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 10 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 468/02

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

2

2014/C 468/03

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.257 Children; no surviving spouse entitled.

Where pension is not payable to a surviving spouse because his or her annual income exceeds the statutory limitation or because of his or her net worth, payments will be made to or for the child or children as if there were no surviving spouse.

[62 FR 5529, Feb. 6, 1997]
§ 75.113 Data breach. Consistent with the definition of data breach in § 75.112 of this subpart, a data breach occurs under this subpart if there is a loss or theft of, or other unauthorized access to, other than an unauthorized access incidental to the scope of employment, data containing sensitive personal information, in electronic or printed form, that results in the potential compromise of the confidentiality or integrity of the data. The term “unauthorized access” used in the definition of “data breach” includes access to an electronic information system and includes, but is not limited to, viewing, obtaining, or using data containing sensitive personal information in any form or in any VA information system. The phrase “unauthorized access incidental to the scope of employment” includes instances when employees of contractors and other entities need access to VA sensitive information in order to perform a contract or agreement with VA but incidentally obtain access to other VA sensitive information. Accordingly, an unauthorized access, other than an unauthorized access incidental to the scope of employment, to data containing sensitive personal information, in electronic or printed form, that results in the potential compromise of the confidentiality or integrity of the data, constitutes a data breach. In addition to these circumstances, VA also interprets data breach to include circumstances in which a user misuses sensitive personal information to which he or she has authorized access. The following circumstances do not constitute a data breach and, consequently, are not subject to the provisions of this subpart: ( a ) An unauthorized access to data containing sensitive personal information that was determined by the Secretary to be incidental to the scope of employment, such as an inadvertent unauthorized viewing of sensitive personal information by a VA employee or a person acting on behalf of VA.
( b ) A loss, theft, or other unauthorized access to data containing sensitive personal information that the Secretary determined to have no possibility of compromising the confidentiality or integrity of the data, such as the inability of compromising the confidentiality or integrity of the data because of encryption or the inadvertent disclosure to another entity that is required to provide the same or a similar level of protection for the data under statutory or regulatory authority.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5724, 5727)
Exhibit 32.2

             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beeper Plus, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Robert Muniz,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/Robert Muniz
------------------
Robert Muniz
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
August 7, 2003
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELDON LEWIS HUFFINE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-30396

D.C. No. CR-05-00019-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2009** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Eldon Lewis Huffine appeals from the five-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

FILED

APR 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-30396

738 (1967), Huffine’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

By order filed February 4, 2010, counsel was advised that the court appeared

to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because appellant has completed his federal

sentence without an additional term of supervised release, and has paid his

restitution, fine, and special assessment. Counsel was ordered to move for

voluntary dismissal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. To

date, counsel has not responded.

Because Huffine has completed his federal sentence, we dismiss the appeal

as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.
#### § 353.1 When granted.

A motion for rehearing may be filed by any participant in the relevant proceeding. The Copyright Royalty Judges may grant rehearing upon a showing that any aspect of the determination may be erroneous.

[71 FR 53330, Sept. 11, 2006]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | February 7, 2005                      |   | /s/ Gerard E. Puorro |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Gerard E. Puorro                      |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138162

FRANK J. LOMBARDO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138162 COA: 289492 Macomb CC: 2 008-005324-CK KOUSAY ASKAR a/k/ a CASEY ASKAR and PITA FRANCHISE CORP., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 29, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould now be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Harary
    Joseph M. Harary
    President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
    August 8, 2005
#### § 1009.6 Exception for certain depository institutions.

The requirements of this part do not apply to any depository institution lacking Federal deposit insurance and located within the United States that does not receive initial deposits of less than an amount equal to the standard maximum deposit insurance amount from individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States, other than money received in connection with any draft or similar instrument issued to transmit money.