### SUPPORTING STATEMENT **ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources**  **(40 CFR Part 63**  **, Subpart JJJJJJ** **) (Renewal) 1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal) , EPA I CR Number 2253.03 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0668

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources ( 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ ) were proposed o n June 4, 2010, and promulgated on March 21, 2011

. At promulgation , EPA announced i t was reconsidering certain portions of the emission standards. EPA proposed a limited number of amendments and technical corrections to the final rule on December 23, 2011. On February

1, 2013, EPA finalized the standard by amending compliance dates and technical corrections to clarify

definitions, references, applicability , and compliance issues raised by petitioners and other stakeholders affected b y the rule. None of the se amendments affected the respondent burden associated with th is information coll ection request (I CR). These regulations apply to existing and new boilers at major and area sources that are designed to burn biomass, coal, or liquid fuels. A major source emits or has the potential to emit 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any single hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or 25 tpy or more of any combination of HAP s . An area source is a HAP

- emitting stationary source that is not a major source. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification , or reconstruction after the date of proposal (i.e ., June 4, 2010). This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to the NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office.

### 2

Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of two affected sources at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 191, 710 existing units at 95,855 facilities will be subject to the se standard s . We estimate an additional 2,260 new units at 1,130 facilities per ye ar will become subject to the standard s . The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) approved the currentl y ac tive IC R without any

Terms of Clearance.
The “Affected Public” are owners and operators of new or existing industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers. The “burden ” to the Affected Public may be found below in :

 Table 1 A : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– Existing and New Large Solid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal );

 Table 1B: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– Existing and New Large Liquid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal) ;

 Table 1C: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– Existing and New S mall Solid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal) ; and

 Table 1D: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– Existing and New Small Liquid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)

. The “burden ” to the Federal Government is attribute d entirel y to work performed by either F ederal emplo yees or government contractor s . This burden may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the**  **Collection** The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. Inaddition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement

### 3

of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such int ervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance c ertifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y r equire. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers either cause or co ntribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health and/or welfare. Therefore, the NE SHAP were promulgated for this source category

at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data**

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure s compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in l egal proceedings. The information will be used by EPA to: (1) i dentify

new, modified, reconstructed and existing sources subject to the NESHAP; (2) ensure the NESHAP is being applied properl y; (3) ensure compliance with the NESHAP; (4) ensure, on a continuous basis, that the operating parameters established during the initial performance test are not exceeded. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emi ssion monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. The notifications required in the se standard s are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The rev iewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , that leaks are being detected and repaired , and that the se standard s are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required annual and biennial reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify

problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. In addition, records and reports are necessary to enable EPA to identify facilities that may not be in compliance. Based on reported information, EPA will decide which facilities should be

### 4

inspected and what records or units should be inspected at the facilities. The records that facilities maintain wil l indicate to EPA whether facility personnel are properly

operating and maintaining boiler s , as well as associated control equipment. **3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state o r local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register (78 FR 35023) on June 11, 2013. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have b een considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our research conducted in preparation of the final rule reconsideration. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard s as they were being developed and the se same standard s have been reviewed previousl y to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this I CR, we contacted both the Council of Industrial Boiler Owners , at (540) 349

- 9043 , and the American Forest & Paper Association , at (202) 463

- 2588. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice.

### 5

**3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likel y. **3(e) General Guidelines** These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR Part 1320, Section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of li mitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five ye ars allow s EPA to establish the compliance history of a source , any pattern of non - compliance , and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, C hapter 1, P art 2, S ubpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976 ; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes** The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners and operators of new or existing industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers

. The NESHAP affects any industry , federal, state, local, or tribal government, or any institution (e.g., an university) using a boiler as defined in the regulation s . This includes, but is not limited to, the following United States Standard Industrial Cla ssification ( SI C ) code s and corresponding North

### 6

American Industry

Classification Sy stem (NAICS ) codes in the following table : **40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ SIC Codes**  **NAICS Codes** Wood product manufacturing 24 321 Food manufacturing 20 311 Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing 32 327
Wholesale trade, nondurable goods 51 424 Real estate 65 531 Educational services 82 611 Religious, grant making, civic, professional, and similar organizations 8 6 813

Public administration 91

- 98 92 Food services and drinking places 58 722 Health care and social assistance 80, 83 62 Based on the distribution of facilities in the boiler inspector inventory for thirteen states, the EPA estimates that 49% of units are located in the private sector and 51 % of units are located in the public sector. **4(b) Information Requeste d**  **(i) Data Items** In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources ( 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ ). A source must make the following reports: **Reports/ Notifications**  Initial Notification that Source is Subject 63.11225 (a) Notification of Compliance Status 63.11225 (a) Initial Report on Results of Energy Audit 63.11210 (j) Annual Compliance Report 63.11225 (b) Biennial Compliance Report 63.11225 (b)

### 7 **Reports/ Notifications**  Performance Test Results 63.11225(e) Notification of Intent to Commence or Recommence Combustion of Solid Waste 63.11225(f) Notification of Switched Fuels or Phys ical Changes to Boiler 63.11225(g) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Records of Operating Parameter Values 63.11225 (c)(7) Records of Deviations 63.11225 (c)(4) and (5) Records of Stack Tests 63.11225 (c)(1) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations 63.11225 (c)(6) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 63.11225 (c)(1) Records of Monthl y Fuel Use 63.11225 (c)(2) Records of Biennial Tune

- up 63.11225 (c)(2) Retain Records for Five Years 63.11225 (d) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate continuous monitoring sy stem ( CMS ) for opacity for electrostatic precipitator sy stems (ESPs) and bag leak detection (BLD) s ys tems. Perform initial performance test, Reference EPA Method s 1, 2, 3A , 3B, 4, 5D, 10, 10A, 10B, 17, 19, 29, 30A, 30B, or 101A , and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above.

### 8 **Respondent Activities** Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem. Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to compl y with the emission standard , and to note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in

### 9

compliance and enforcement programs. The annual and biennial reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compli ance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegat ed Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** The EPA expect s the NESHAP to adversel y affect small entities. In developing the regulation, small entity

is defined as a small business . A ccording to Small Business Administration ’s size standards b y the NA IC S category of the owning entity , the small business size standard for manufacturing sectors in the expected industries potentially affected by

this rule is less than 500 employees. For trade sectors, the size standard is : (1) less than 100 employees; (2) a small organization that is any n ot

- for

- profit enterprise that is independently

- owned and

- operated and is not dominant in its field. For non

- profit and service industries , the small business size range for potentially

- affected sources is based on total sales of the entity , which range f rom sales less than $10 and up to $50 million dollars; (3) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district , or special district with a population of less than 50,000 individuals

. The EPA has determined that there are approximately 189,450 existing affected sources at 94,725 facilities. O f these affected units, the EPA has reduced testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for 175,635 units with design heat capacities less than 10 MMBtu/hr because the Agency found it is impracticable to enforce the emission standards for these small units due to technical or economic limitations. In stead of requiring small sources to conduct and submit stack test reports, the final rule requires small unit s to comply with the rule by conducting a biennial tune

- up and preparing a summary report of the procedures followed during the tune

- up. Based on the definition for sectors potentially affected by

this rule, EPA computed the overall share of small entitie s to the overall number of affected entities. The overall share of small entities from manufacturing, trading, service, not

- for

- profit, and state, local, and tribal governments is estimated to be 97 percent, or 183,767 existing units subject to recordkeep ing and reporting requirements. By reducing the requirements for small sources, the EPA has substantially

reduced the burden on small entities. Further, EPA is not requiring Maximum Achievable Control Technology ( MACT ) floor control for mercury from biom ass and liquid units. This reduces the compliance , testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements on nearl y al l units. Mercury control testing and monitoring will be required at 573 large coal

- fired boilers out of the 189,450 total boilers, but will be achieving 95 percent reduction of the estimated mercury emissions from the entire source category . By not requiring

### 10

MACT control for mercury from biomass and liquid

- fired units , we are providing flexibility to over 99 percent of affected unit s, including the small entities. The Area Boilers NESHAP does not contain any provisions reserved exclusively for the benefit of small entities. However, the regulation does contain several provisions that reduce the impact on all regulated entities, which include small entities. The alternative work practice standards provide for enhanced compliance flexibility and reduced recordkeeping and reporting requirements for affected sources with small boiler s. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity w ithin this request is shown in below Tables 1A through 1D

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respo ndent Burden**  The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 1,656,984 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table s 1 A through 1D ). These hours are based on Agency studies an d background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously

- approved ICR, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $127.43 ($60.68 + 110%) Technical $99.16 ($47.22 + 110%) Clerical $50.88 ($24.23 + 110%)

### 11

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs**  The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor s and other costs su ch as photocop yi ng and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Continuous Monitoring Device Capital/Startup

Cost for One Respondent Number of

New Respondents Total

Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) Annual

O&M Costs for One Respondent Number of

Respondents with O&M Total O&M,

(E X F)

**Large Solid Boilers** Initial Stack Test and Report (Hg) $5,000 0 $0 $0 0 $0 Triennial Stack Test and Report (Hg) $0 286.5 $0 $1,650 286.5 $472,725.000 Initial Stack Test and Report (CO) $6,000 0 $0 $0 0 $0 Triennial Stack Test and Report (CO) $0 286.5 $0 $1,980 286.5 $567,270.000 Initial Stack Test and Report (PM) $8,000 1.83 $14,640.000 $0 1.83 $0 Triennial Stack Test and Report (PM) $0 9.16 $0 $2,640 9.16 $24,182.400 Electrostatic Precipitator System $43,100 1.83 $78,873.000 $14,700 9.16 $134,652.000 Bag Leak Detection Sy stem $25,500 0 $0 $9,700 286.5 $2,779,050.000 Biennial Tune

- Up $0 1,783 $0 $1,437.5 1,783 $2,563,062.500 Subtotal $93,513 $6,540,942 **Large Liquid Boilers** Initial Stack Test and Report (PM) $8,000 81.17 $649,360 $0 81.17 $0 Triennial Stack Test and Report (PM) $0 405.84 $0 $2,640 405.84 $1,071,417.6 Electrostatic Precipitator System $43,100 81.17 $3,498,427 $14,700 405.84 $5,965,848

### 12 **Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Continuous Monitoring Device Capital/Startup

Cost for One Respondent Number of

New Respondents Total

Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) Annual

O&M Costs for One Respondent Number of

Respondents with O&M Total O&M,

(E X F)
Bag Leak Detection Sy stem $25,500 7.50 $191,250 $9,700 15 $145,500 Biennial Tune

- Up $0 5,020.33 $0 $1,438 5,020.33 $7,216,724.38 Subtotal $4,339,037 $14,399,490 **Sm all Solid Boilers**  Biennial Tune

- Up $0 5,560.33 $0 $1,114 5,560.33 $6,194,207.62 Subtotal $0 $6,194,208 **Sm all Liquid Boilers**  Biennial Tune

- Up $0 84,334.5 $0 $1,114 84,334.5 $93,948,633 Subtotal $0 $93,948,633 **Total $4,432,550**  **$121,083,273** 

### The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $4,432,550 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $121,083,273

. This is the total of column G.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 125,515,823

. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $6,821,798

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 3 General Schedule , which excludes locality

rates of pay

. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for

### 13

the benefit packages available to government employees . Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sourc es (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 95,855 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional 1,130 respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 9 6,985 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table th at addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR. **Number of Respondents**

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

**Large Solid Boilers**
1 10 2,049.5 0 0 2,0 5 9.5 2 10 2,0 5 9.5 0 0 2,0 6 9.5 3 10 2,0 6 9.5 0 0 2,079.5 Average 10 2,060 0 0 2,070 **Large Liquid Boilers**
1 81.17 4,858 0 0 4,939.17 2 81.17 4,939.17 0 0 5,020.34 3 81.17 5,020.34 0 0 5,101.51 Average 81 4,939 0 0 5,020

### 14 **Number of Respondents**
**Sm all Solid Boilers** 
1 49.17 5,462 0 0 5,511.17 2 49.17 5,511.17 0 0 5,560.34 3 49.17 5,560.34 0 0 5,609.51 Average 49 5,511 0 0 5,560
**Sm all Liquid Boilers** 
1 989.5 82,355.5 0 0 83,345 2 989.5 83,345 0 0 84,334.5 3 989.5 84,334.5 0 0 85,324 Average 990 83,345 0 0 84,33 5
**Total 1,130**  **95,855 0**  **0 96,985**  1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. 

### C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 96,985

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table: **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

**Large Solid Boilers** Initial Notification 10 1 0 10 Notification of Compliance Status 10 1 0 10 Annual Compliance Report 2,069.5 1 0 2,069.5 Biennial Compliance Report 1,783 0.5 0 891.5 Subtotal 2,981 **Large Liquid Boilers** Initial Notification 81.17 1 0 81.17

### 15 **Total Annual Responses** Notification of Compliance Status 81.17 1 0 81.17 Annual Compliance Report 405.84 1 0 405.84 Biennial Compliance Report 5,020.33 0.5 0 2,510.17 Subtotal 3,078 **Sm all Solid Boilers**  Initial Notification 49.17 1 0 49.17 Notification of Compliance Status 49.17 1 0 49.17 Biennial Compliance Report 5,560.33 0.5 0 2,780.17 Subtotal 2,879 **Sm all Liquid Boilers**  Initial Notification 989.5 1 0 989.5 Notification of Compliance Status 989.5 1 0 989.5 Biennial Compliance Report 84,334.5 0.5 0 42,167.25 Subtotal 44,146
**Total 53,084**  

### The number of Total Annual Responses is 53,084

. The total annual labor costs are $159,386,70 5

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table s 1 A through 1D

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables**  The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown below in Tables 1 A through 1D and 2 below , respectively , and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 1,656,984 hours

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table s 1 A through 1D

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 1 hours per response

.

### 16

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $125,515,823

. The cost calculations are detailed above in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

**(ii) The Agency Tally**  The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 149,141 labor hours at a cost of $6,821,798 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

–

NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden**  There is a decrease in the total estimated burden as currentl y identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This de crease is not due to any program changes. The change in burden and cost estimates occurred because the standard s have been in effect for more than three ye ars and the requirements are different during initial compliance (new facilities) , as compared to the on

- going compliance, which is reflected in this estimates for this I CR. The previous I CR reflected those burdens and costs associated with initial activities for subject facilities. This includes purchasing monitoring equipment and conducting performance tests. This I CR, by

in large, reflects the on

- going burden and costs for existing facilities. The overall result is a decrease in burden hours and costs. There is also a decrease in total annual capital/startup and O&M costs as compared to the previous I CR. This decrease is attributed to the fact that initial compliance with the standard occurred during the period of the previous ICR (e.g., monitors were purchased). For the next three ye ars, fewer monitors will be purchased ; however, existing CEM monitors will have on

going O&M costs. **6(g ) Burden Statement**  The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 1 h ours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying inform ation, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

### 17

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0298 . An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ , which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Infor mation Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s. The telephon e number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0298 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0668 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.

### 18

**Table 1 A**  **: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– Existing and New Large Solid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial,** 

**Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H**
**Technical Person** 
**** **Hours per Occurrence**  **Occurrences**

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year**  **(C=AxB) Respondents** 

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements c 40 1 40 10 400 40 20 $44,248 B. Required Activities 1) Conduct Energy Audit a) Industrial d, e 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 b) Commercial d, e 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 2) Initial Stack Test (Hg) f, g 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 3) Initial Stack Test (CO) f 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 4) Initial Stack Test (PM) f, h 12 1 12 1.83 21.96 2.2 1.1 $2,429.66 5) Triennial Stack Test (Hg) f 12 0.33 3.96 286.5 1,134.54 113.45 56.73 $125,502.43 6) Triennial Stack Test (CO) f 12 0.33 3.96 286.5 1,134.54 113.45 56.73 $125,502.43 7) Triennial Stack Test (PM) f, h 12 0.33 3.96 9.16 36.27 3.63 1.81 $4,011.88 8) Initial Fuel Analysis for Hg Content g 5 1 5 0 0 0 0.00 $0 9) Monthly Fuel Analysis for Hg Contentg 5 12 60 0 0 0 0 $0 10) Continuous Parameter Monitoring a) Establish Site

- Specific Monitoring Plan (Hg, CO, and PM) f, i 40 1 40 10 400 40 20 $44,247.80 b) Opacity (All Sources with ESPs) i) Initial

j 10 1 10 1.83 $18.3 $1.83 $0.92 $2,025 ii) Annual

j 10 1 10 9.16 $91.6 $9.16 $4.58 $10,132.75 c) BLD System Operation (All Sources with Fabric Filters) i) Initial k 10 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 ii) Annual k 10 1 10 286.5 2,865 287 143 $316,924.87 11) Biennial Tune

- Up l 12 0.5 6 1,783 10,698 1,070 535 $1,183,407.41 C. Create Information N/A

### 19

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H**
**Technical Person** 
**** **Hours per Occurrence**  **Occurrences**

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year**  **(C=AxB) Respondents** 

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** D. Gather Information N/A E. Report Preparation 1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 1 2 10 20 2 1 $2,212.39 2) Notification of Compliance Status 8 1 8 10 80 8 4 $8,849.56 3) Initial Report on Results of Energy Audit d 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 $0 4) Annual Compliance Report 30 1 30 2,069.5 62,085 6,209 3,104 $6,867,811.66 5) Bennial Compliance Reportl 5 0.5 2.5 1,783 4,457.5 445.75 222.88 $493,087.06 6) Affirmative Defense m 30 1 30 0 0 0 0 $0 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 95,959**  **$9,230,393** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions See 3A B. Implement Activities N/A C. Develop Record Systemn N/A D. Record Information 1) Records of Operating Parameter Values f 20 1 20 295.7 5,913 591 295.7 $654,137.35 2) Records of Deviations f 15 1 15 295.7 4,435.1 443.51 221.75 $490,602.95 3) Records of Stack Tests f 2 1 2 295.7 591 59.1 29.57 $65,413.91 4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations f 2 1 2 295.7 591 59.1 29.57 $65,413.91 5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted f 2 2 4 2,069.5 8,278 827.8 413.9 $915,708.22 6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use f 0.5 12 6 295.7 1,774 177.4 88.700 $196,240.98 7) Records of Biennial Tune

- Up 0.5 0.5 0.25 1,783 445.750 44.580 22.290 $49,309.22 E. Personnel Training N/A F. Time for Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 25,333**  **$2,436,827 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (ROUNDED)**  **121,292 $11,667,2**  **20** Notes: N/A

– Not Applicable
a On average, over the 3

- year period of this ICR, we estimate 4,119 existing large solid boilers (i.e., biomass

- and coal

- fired boilers >10 MMBtu/hr) at 2,059.5 facilities will be subject to the rule. We also estimate 20 new boilers at 10 facilities per year, all of which are biomass

- fired, for a total of 4,139 boilers at 2,069.5

### 20

facilities. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $99.16 for technical, $127.43 for managerial, and $50.88 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2013, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by oc cupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry.
c This burden applies to new sources only . The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements and submit an initial notifications was incurred during a previous ICR period. d This burden applies to existing large solid fuel boilers only. All existing sources were required to complete the energy audit by the conclusion of the previous ICR period; therefore, no new or existing sources will incur this burden over the next three years.
e Cost per occurrence for certified energy audit professionals includes a phone screening to dis cuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2

- to 4

- hour site visit, and an additional 2 to 4 hours to prepare a follow

-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10% of sources will be industrial and 90% will be commercial. f Only existing and new large coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury (Hg) and carbon monoxide (CO) limits, while new large coal and biomass boilers are subject to particulate matter (PM) limits. g All projected large solid fuel boilers are expected to comply through stack testing instead of the fuel testing compliance option

. h Only boilers <30 MMBtu/hr that are not subject to limits under the NSPS (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts Db, Dc) will incur additional testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs under this rule. It is estimated that 11 boilers (5.5 facilities, assuming 2 boilers per f acility) will be subject to additional testing. i Sources demonstrating compliance with any applicable emissio n limits through stack testing must develop a site

- specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan. j All new biomass boilers >10 MMBtu/hr are expected to meet PM limits with an electrostatic precipitator (ESP); therefore, those sources will install opacity mo nitors. k All new coal boilers >10 MMBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters equipped with bag leak detection (BLD) systems instead of opacity monitors. No new large coal boilers are projected over the three

- year ICR period. l Only existing large biomass boilers are subject to biennial tune

- ups. m It is assumed that no affirmative defense claims will be filed over the three

- year ICR period.
n It is assumed that facilities must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance scheduling; therefore, no new record system would be required.

### 21

**Table 1B: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– Existing and**  **New Large Liquid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial,**

**Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H**
**Technical Person** 
**** **Hours per Occurrence**  **Occurrences**

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year**  **(C=AxB) Respondents** 

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements c 40 1 40 81.17 3,247 325 162 $359,159.39 B. Required Activities 1) Conduct Energy Audit a) Industrial d, e 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 b) Commercial d, e 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 2) Initial Stack Test and Report (PM) f 12 1 12 81.17 974.04 97.4 48.7 $107,747.36 3) Triennial Stack Test and Report (PM) f 12 0.33 3.96 405.84 1,607.13 160.71 80.4 $177,780.21 4) Continuous Parameter Monitoring a) Establish Site

- specific monitoring plan g 40 1 40 81.17 3,246.80 324.68 162.3 $359,159.39 b) Opacity (All Sources with ESPs) i) Initial 10 1 10 81.17 811.70 81.17 40.6 $89,790.49 ii) Annual 10 1 10 405.84 4,058.40 405.84 202.9 $448,938.18 c) BLD System Operation (All Sources with Fabric Filters) i) Initial 10 1 10 7.5 75 7.5 3.75 $8,296.46 ii) Annual 10 1 10 15 150 15 7.5 $16,592.93 5) Biennial Tune

- Up 12 0.5 6 5,020.3 30,122 3,012.2 1,506.10 $3,332,078.6 C. Create Information N/A D. Gather Information N/A E. Report Preparation 1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 1 2 81.17 162.34 16.23 8.12 $17,958.15 2) Notification of Compliance Status 8 1 8 81.17 649.36 64.94 32.47 $71,832.34 3) Initial Report on Results of Energy Audit d 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 $0 4) Annual Compliance Report 30 1 30 405.84 12,175.2 1,217.52 608.76 $1,346,814.54

### 22

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H**
**Technical Person** 
**** **Hours per Occurrence**  **Occurrences**

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year**  **(C=AxB) Respondents** 

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** 5) Biennial Compliance Report 5 0.5 2.5 5,020.3 12,550.83 1,255.08 627.54 $1,388,366.20 6) Affirmative Defense h 30 1 30 0 0 0 0 $0 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements**  **80,304 $7,724,514**  4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions See 3A B. Implement Activities N/A C. Develop Record Systemi N/A D. Record Information 1) Records of Operating Parameter Values 20 1 20 5,020.33 100,406.6 10,040.66 5,020.33 $11,106,927.89 2) Records of Deviations 15 1 15 5,020.33 75,304.95 7,530.5 3,765.25 $8,330,196.49 3) Records of Stack Tests 2 1 2 5,020.33 10,040.66 1,004.07 502.03 $1,110,692.61 4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations 2 1 2 5,020.33 10,040.66 1,004.07 502.03 $1,110,692.61 5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 2 4 5,020.33 20,081.32 2,008.13 1,004.07 $2,221,385.99 6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use 0.5 12 6 5,020.33 30,121.98 3,012.2 1,506.1 $3,332,078.60 7) Records of Biennial Tune

- Up 0.5 0.5 0.25 5,020.33 1,255.08 125.51 62.75 $138,835.91 E. Personnel Training N/A

. F. Time for Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 284,339**  **$27,350,810 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (ROUNDED)**  **364,643 $35,075,324**  Notes: N/A

– Not Applicable
a On average, over the 3

- year period of this ICR, we estimate 9,878 existing large liquid boilers (i.e., units > 10 MMBtu/hr) at 4,939 facilities will be subject to the rule. We also estimate 162 new boilers at 81 facilities per year, for a total of 10,040 boilers at 5,020 facilities. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $99.16 for technical, $127.43 for managerial, and $50.88 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2013, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by oc cupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry.
c This burden applies to new sources only. The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements and submit an initial notifications was incurred during a previous ICR period. d This burden applies to existing large liquid fuel boilers onl y. All existing sources were required to complete the energy audit by the conclusion of the previous ICR period; therefore, no new or existing sources will incur this burden over the next three years.
e Cost per occurrence for certified energy audit profes sionals includes a phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2

- to 4

- hour site visit, and an

### 23

additional 2 to 4 hours to prepare a follow

-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or comme rcial. It is assumed that 10% of sources will be industrial and 90% will be commercial. f All projected large liquid fuel boilers are expected to comply through stack testing instead of the fuel testing compliance o ption. Only units <30 MMBtu/hr that are not subject to PM limits under the NSPS (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts Db, Dc) will incur additional testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs under this rule. g Sources demonstrating compliance with any applicable emission limits through stack testing must develop a site

- specific monitoring plan. All new large liquid fuel units are expected to develop this plan. h It is assumed that no affirmative defense claims will be filed over the three

- year ICR period. i It is assumed that facilities must alre ady maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance scheduling; therefore, no new record system would be required.

### 24

**Table 1C: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– Existing and New Small Solid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial,** 

**Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H Technical**  **Person**
  ** Hours per** **Occurrence Occurrences** 

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year (C=AxB)**  **Respondents**

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements c 40 1 40 49.17 1,966.8 196.68 98.34 $217,566.43 B. Required Activities Biennial Tune

- Up 12 0.5 6 5,560.33 33,361.98 3,336.20 1,668.1 $3,690,485.78 C. Create Information N/A D. Gather Information N/A E. Report Preparation 1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 1 2 49.17 98.34 9.83 4.92 $10,878.50 2) Notification of Compliance Status 8 1 8 49.17 393.36 39.34 19.67 $43,513.74 3) Biennial Compliance Report 5 0.5 2.5 5,560.33 13,900.83 1,390.08 695.04 $1,537,702.52 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 57,180**  **$5,500,147** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions See 3A B. Implement Activities N/A C. Develop Record Systemd N/A D. Record Information 1) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 1 2 5,560.33 11,120.66 1,112.07 556.03 $1,230,161.67 2) Records of Biennial Tune

- Up 0.5 0.5 0.25 5,560.33 1,390.08 139.01 69.5 $153,769.55 E. Personnel Training N/A F. Time for Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 14,387**  **$1,383,931 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (ROUNDED)**  **71,567 $6,884,078**  Notes: N/A

– Not Applicable
a On average, over the 3

- year period of this ICR, we estimate 11,022 existing small solid boilers (i.e., units <10 MMBtu/hr) at 5,511 facilities will be subject to the rule. We also estimate 98 new boilers at 49 facilities per year, for a total of 11,120 b oilers at 5,560 facilities.

### 25

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $99.16 for technical, $127.43 for managerial, and $50.88 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2013, “Tab le 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry.
c This burden applies to new sources only. The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements and submit i nitial notifications was incurred during a previous ICR period. d It is assumed that facilities must already maintain records on b oiler insurance and/or maintenance scheduling; therefore, no new record system would be required.

### 26

**Table 1D: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– Existing and New Small Liquid Fuel Boilers, NESHAP for Industrial,** 

**Commercial, and Institut ional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal)** 

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H Technical**  **Person**
  ** Hours per** **Occurrence Occurrences** 

**per Respondent**  **per Year Technical** 

**Person**
**- Hours**  **per Respondent per Year**  **(C=AxB) Respondents** 

**per Year a**  **Technical**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=CxD) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Ex0.10) Management** 

**Hours per Year**  **(G=Ex0.05) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **b** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements c 40 1 40 989.5 39,580 3,958 1,979 $4,378,320 B. Required Activities Biennial Tune

- Up 12 0.5 6 84,334.5 506,007 50,600.7 25,300.35 $55,974,241 C. Create Information N/A D. Gather Information N/A E. Report Preparation 1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 1 2 989.5 1,979 197.9 98.95 $218,916 2) Notification of Compliance Status 8 1 8 989.5 7,916 791.6 395.8 $875,664 3) Biennial Compliance Report 5 0.5 2.5 84,334.5 210,836.25 21,083.63 10,541.81 $23,322,600 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 881,266**  **$84,769,742** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions See 3A B. Implement Activities N/A C. Develop Record Systemd N/A D. Record Information 1) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 1 2 84,335 168,669 16,866.9 8,433.45 $18,658,080 2) Records of Biennial Tune

- Up 0.5 0.5 0.25 84,335 21,083.63 2,108.36 1,054.18 $2,332,260 E. Personnel Training N/A F. Time for Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements**  **218,216 $20,990,341**  **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (ROUNDED) 1,099,482**  **$105,760,08 3**  Notes: N/A

– Not Applicable
a On average, over the 3

- year period of this ICR, we estimate 166,690 existing small liquid boilers (i.e., units <10 MMBtu/hr) at 83,345 facilities wi ll be subject to the rule. We also estimate 1,979 new boilers at 989.5 facilities per year, for a total of 168,669 boilers at 84,334.5 facilities.

### 27

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $99.16 for technical, $127.43 for managerial, and $50.88 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Decemb er 2013, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry

. c This burden applies to new sources only. The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements and submit i nitial notifications was incurred during a previous ICR period. d It is assumed that facilities must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance scheduling; therefore, no new record system would be required.

### 28

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institu**  **tional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ) (Renewal).** 

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **Technical Person** 
**** **Hours per Occurrence**  **Occurrences**

**per Year Technical Person** 
****

**Hours per Respondent**  **per Year (C=AxB) Technical** 

**Hours per Year (D=C)**  **Management**

**Hours per Year**  **(E=Dx0.05) Clerical** 

**Hours per Year**  **(F=Dx0.10) Total Cost** 

**per Year ($)**  **a** 1. Read and Understand Rule Requirements b 40 0 0 0 0 0 $0 2. Enter and Update I

nformation into Agency Recordkeeping Systemc 2 1,129.84 2,259.68 2,259.68 112.98 225.97 $117,106.59 3. Required Activities a) Observe I

nitial Stack/Performance Test d 40 83 3,320 3,320 166 332 $172,057.34 b) Observe Repeat Performance Test e 40 8.3 332 332 16.6 33.2 $17,205.73 c) Review Operating Parameters f 2 83 166 166 8.3 16.6 $8,602.87 d) Review Continuous Parameter Monitoring g 2 5,316 10,632 10,632 531.6 1,063.2 $550,998.08 4. Excess Emissions Enforcement Activities and I nspections h 24 8.30 199.2 199.2 9.96 19.92 $10,323.44 5. Notification Requirements a) Review Initial Notification that Sources are Subject to the Standard c 2 1,129.84 2,259.68 2,259.68 112.98 225.97 $117,106.59 b) Review Notification of I nitial Performance Tests and Review Test Plan f 20 83 1,660 1,660 83 166 $86,028.67 c) Review Notification of Compliance Status c 2 1,129.84 2,259.68 2,259.68 112.98 225.97 $117,106.59 6. Reporting Requirements 0 a) Review Annual Compliance Report 4 2,475.34 9,901.36 9,901.36 495.07 990.14 $513,133.26 b) Review Biennial Compliance Report 2 48,349.08 96,698.16 96,698.16 4,834.91 9,669.82 $5,011,334. 02 c) Review Initial Report on Energy Audit Results i 2 0 0 0 0 0 $0 7. Travel Expenses for Performance Tests Observed j $100,795.2 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (ROUNDED) 149,141**  **$6,821,798**
Notes: N/A

– Not Applicable
a This ICR uses the following labor rates: $46.21 for technical, $62.27 for managerial, and $25.01 for clerical labor. These r ates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2013 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates hav e been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. b No burden will be incurred over the three

- year ICR period, as this was a one

- time requirement during the previous ICR period.
c All new sources must submit initial notifications and notifications of compliance status, regardless of subcategory. d It is assumed that EPA will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
e It is assumed that 10% of initial performance tests will be rep eated, which will be observed by EPA. f The number of occurrences is based on the number of new facilities that will test and set/submit operating limits. All new s ources must submit operating limits,

### 29

regardless of subcategory. g The number of occurrences is based on the number of facilities maintaining records of control device parameters. h It is assumed that 10% of new facilities will have exceedances, requiring EPA enforcement. i All existing sources at the time of promulgation of the standard were required to complete the energy audit by the conclusion of the previous ICR period; therefore, no new or existing sources will incur this burden over the next three years. j The total cost is based on the number of performance tests observed by EPA multiplied by the cost of each trip. Based on EPA experience with other rulemakings, each trip is estimated to be 3 days x ($110 hotel + $58 meals/incidentals) + ($600 round trip) = $1,104 per trip

.