alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 332/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 332 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 332

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 332/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10277 — Geely/Futaihua/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 332/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10274 — EDFR/Lumani/GLD) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2021/C 332/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10332 — KKR/Equitix Tetragon/Target) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 332/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10277 — Geely/Futaihua/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 332/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10274 — EDFR/Lumani/GLD) (
  1
  )

1

2

2021/C 332/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10332 — KKR/Equitix Tetragon/Target) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 332/04 | Euro exchange rates — 17 August 2021 | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 332/04

Euro exchange rates — 17 August 2021

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 332/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10287 — Proximus/Besix/SL/i.Leco) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2021/C 332/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10423 — AEA Investors/Polygon Holding) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2021/C 332/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10394 – Platinum Equity Group/Solenis) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 332/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10287 — Proximus/Besix/SL/i.Leco) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2021/C 332/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10423 — AEA Investors/Polygon Holding) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

2021/C 332/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10394 – Platinum Equity Group/Solenis) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 14/20 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 14 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 14

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 014/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 014/2 | State aid — Portugal — State aid No C 41/2004 (ex N 221/2004) — Investment aid to Orfama, Organização Fabril de Malhas S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 014/3 | COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 014/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 014/2

State aid — Portugal — State aid No C 41/2004 (ex N 221/2004) — Investment aid to Orfama, Organização Fabril de Malhas S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

2

2005/C 014/3

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

6

---

| | II   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 014/4 | Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 7 |

II   Preparatory Acts

Commission

2005/C 014/4

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1010.552 Previously accepted state filings. ( a ) Materials filed with a state and accepted by the HUD Secretary as a Statement of Record prior to January 1, 1981, pursuant to 24 CFR 1010.52 through 1010.59 (as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 1979) may continue in effect. However, developers must comply with the applicable amendments to the Federal act and the regulations thereunder. In particular, see §§ 1010.558 and 1010.559, which require that the Property Report and contracts or agreements contain notice of purchaser's revocation rights. In addition, see 15 U.S.C. 1703(a)(2)(D), which provides that it is unlawful to make any representations with regard to the developer's obligation to provide or complete roads, water, sewers, gas, electrical facilities or recreational amenities, unless the developer is obligated to do so in the contract.
( b ) If any such filing becomes inactive or suspended under the laws of the state, the registration with the Director shall be ineffective from that time.
( c ) Such Statement of Record may be suspended pursuant to § 1010.45.
( d ) The Director may refuse to accept any particular filing under this section when it is determined that acceptance is not in the public interest.
( e ) The Director may require such changes, additional information, documents or certification as the Director determines to be reasonably necessary or appropriate in the public interest.
[76 FR 79489, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 29118, May 11, 2016]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27899]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0558; FRL-9919-04]

Proposed Removal of Certain Inert Ingredients From Approved 
Chemical Substance List for Pesticide Products; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of October 22, 
2014, concerning the removal of certain chemical substances from the 
current listing of inert ingredients approved for use in pesticide 
products because the inert ingredients are no longer used in any 
registered pesticide product. This document extends the comment period 
for 60 days, from November 21, 2014, to January 20, 2015. Pesticide 
registrants and other stakeholders potentially impacted by the EPA 
proposal requested an extension on the comment period stating that more 
time was needed to confirm the chemical substances against the 
registrations. EPA grants the extension request to provide stakeholders 
with sufficient time to conduct the necessary record verifications.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2014-0558, must be received on or before January 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in 
the Federal Register document of October 22, 2014 (79 FR 63120) (FRL-
9916-22).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameo G. Smoot, Field and External 
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5454; email address: 
smoot.cameo@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register document of October 22, 
2014. In that document, EPA solicits comment from stakeholders on EPA's 
proposal to remove 72 inert ingredients from the approved chemical 
substance list for pesticide products. EPA is hereby extending the 
comment period, which was set to end on November 21, 2014, to January 
20, 2015.
    To submit comments, or access the public docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of October 22, 2014. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: November 17, 2014.
James J. Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-27899 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
§ 1070.36 Considerations in determining whether the CFPB will comply with a demand or request. ( a ) In deciding whether to comply with a demand or request, CFPB officials and attorneys shall consider, among other pertinent considerations: ( 1 ) Whether such compliance would be unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose;
( 2 ) Whether the number of similar requests would have a cumulative effect on the expenditure of CFPB resources;
( 3 ) Whether compliance is appropriate under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege or disclosure of information;
( 4 ) The public interest;
( 5 ) The need to conserve the time of CFPB employees for the conduct of official business;
( 6 ) The need to avoid spending time and money of the United States for private purposes;
( 7 ) The need to maintain impartiality between private litigants in cases where a substantial government interest is not implicated;
( 8 ) Whether compliance would have an adverse effect on performance by the CFPB of its mission and duties;
( 9 ) The need to avoid involving the CFPB in controversial issues not related to its mission;
( 10 ) Whether compliance would interfere with supervisory examinations, compromise the CFPB's supervisory functions or programs, or undermine public confidence in supervised financial institutions; and
( 11 ) Whether compliance would interfere with the CFPB's ability to monitor for risks to consumers in the offering or provision of consumer financial products and services.
( b ) Among those demands and requests in response to which compliance will not ordinarily be authorized are those with respect to which any of the following factors, inter alia, exist: ( 1 ) Compliance would violate a statute or applicable rule of procedure;
( 2 ) Compliance would violate a specific regulation or Executive order;
( 3 ) Compliance would reveal information properly classified in the interest of national security;
( 4 ) Compliance would reveal confidential or privileged commercial or financial information or trade secrets without the owner's consent;
( 5 ) Compliance would compromise the integrity of the deliberative processes of the CFPB;
( 6 ) Compliance would not be appropriate or necessary under the relevant substantive law governing privilege;
( 7 ) Compliance would reveal confidential information; or
( 8 ) Compliance would interfere with ongoing investigations or enforcement proceedings, compromise constitutional rights, or reveal the identity of a confidential informant.
( c ) The CFPB may condition disclosure of official information pursuant to a request or demand on the entry of an appropriate protective order.
§ 42.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or his or her representative.
§ 1010.556 Previously accepted state filings—amendments and consolidations. ( a ) *Amendments* — ( 1 ) *General requirements.* State accepted materials, filed with the Director pursuant to § 1010.552, shall be amended to reflect any amendment to such materials made effective by the state or any change of a material fact regarding the subdivision. All amendments to such materials, which reflect changes in material facts regarding the subdivision, shall be submitted to the state authorities within 15 days of the date on which the developer knows, or should have known, of such change and to the Director within 15 days after it becomes effective under the applicable State laws. However, such amendment shall not be effective as a Federal registration until the Director has determined that the amendment meets all applicable requirements of these regulations.
( 2 ) Amendments shall include or be accompanied by: ( i ) A letter from the developer giving a narrative statement fully explaining the purpose and significance of the amendment and referring to that section and page of the Statement of Record which is being amended, and;
( ii ) All amended pages of the state accepted materials filed with the Director. These pages shall be copied together with their amendments. Each such page shall have its date of preparation in the lower right hand corner, and;
( iii ) A signed state acceptance certification, and;
( iv ) The appropriate fees as indicated in § 1010.35.
( b ) *Consolidations* — ( 1 ) *When consolidations allowed.* If lots are to be registered pursuant to § 1010.552 which are in the same common promotional plan with other lots already registered with the Director, then new consolidated state accepted materials including such lots may be filed with the Director as a Statement of Record following the format of the previously accepted filing.
( 2 ) Consolidated Statements of Record shall include or be accompanied by: ( i ) State accepted consolidation materials which are also acceptable to the Director as a Statement of Record (state property report inclusive). These state accepted consolidation materials shall cover all lots previously registered in the common promotional plan except those deleted pursuant to other provisions in these regulations. These materials shall also include information and items required for state accepted materials filed as an initial registration Statement of Record, except that, supporting documentation in materials previously made effective by the Director for other lots in the subject common promotional plan may be included incorporated by reference into the new consolidation materials submitted as a Statement of Record. However, such documentation may be incorporated by reference included only if it is applicable to the new consolidated lots as well as to the previously registered lots.
( ii ) A signed state acceptance certification.
( iii ) The appropriate fees as indicated in § 1010.35.
( c ) *Effective date; state filing.* The effective dates of state materials filed as amendments and consolidated Statements of Record shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of § 1010.21.
§ 17.616 Award procedures. ( a ) *Distribution of funds.* ( 1 ) Each covered medical school that opts to participate in the VHVMASP will reserve two seats in the entering class of 2020 for eligible veterans who receive funds for the VHVMASP. Funding will be awarded to two eligible veterans with the highest admissions ranking among veteran applicants for such entering class for each covered medical school.
( 2 ) If two or more eligible veterans do not apply for admission at a covered medical school for the entering class of 2020, VA will distribute the available funding to eligible veterans who applied, and are accepted, for admission at other covered medical schools.
( b ) *Amount of funds.* An eligible veteran will receive funding from the VHVMASP equal to the actual cost of the following: ( 1 ) Tuition at the covered medical school for which the veteran enrolls for a period of not more than 4 years;
( 2 ) Books, fees, and technical equipment;
( 3 ) Fees associated with the National Residency Match Program;
( 4 ) Two away rotations, performed during the fourth year of school, at a VA medical facility; and
( 5 ) A monthly stipend for the four-year period during which the eligible veteran is enrolled in a covered medical school in an amount to be determined by VA.
#### § 20.803 Rule 803. Content of Board decision, remand, or order in simultaneously contested claims.

The content of the Board's decision, remand, or order in appeals involving a simultaneously contested claim will be limited to information that directly affects the issues involved in the contested claim. Appellate issues that do not involve all of the contesting parties will be addressed in one or more separate written decisions, remands, or orders that will be furnished only to the appellants concerned and their representatives, if any.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), 38 U.S.C. 5701(a))

[84 FR 188, Jan. 18, 2019]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20468

Conference Calendar

 

LEWIS BROWN HODGE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HENRY KEENE; WAYNE

SCOTT, Director,

Texas Dep’t of Criminal

Justice, Institutional

Division,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-4998

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. App. P., requires that the

notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of

entry of the judgment or order from which appeal is taken.
No. 96-20468

- 2 -

The district court entered final judgment on April 5, 1996. 

Therefore, the final day for filing a timely notice of appeal was

Monday May 6, 1996, because the thirtieth day was a Sunday. See

Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). Hodge’s notice of appeal was dated May 8,

1996, and was not filed into the court record until May 13, 1996. 

Thus, it was filed after the prescribed appeal period. The time

limitation for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional, and

the lack of a timely notice mandates dismissal of the appeal. 

Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985).

Hodge’s motion for relief from further confinement is

DENIED. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
14910-I3-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Xl.'l1JRR~:Nm

"our,':l:;$"MHOL

IlrR.3.

~snU'OI

Fedenll Aviation Administration

RIN 2120-i\A64

~

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasilelra de Aeronautica 5.A. (EMBRAER) Mod tr'" J

o 2PJ(d}

ERJ 170 Airplanes; and Model ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -200 STD, -20( o,m:~""=iE&-

"'TI -~""'"

LR. and -200 IGW Airplanes ~~

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. °70-( Cvf

><GW"OOL

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). '''T:~H -7

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2009-}~i*~ Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-212-ADJ

INITlAI'>'IG

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product Cf-l.-

IJ"r~

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness m:,,( (4.

illfomlation (MeAt) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

. l'~

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAl describes the unsafe 71i t-tj'Q ~

condition as: -( C'.

The proposed AD would require actions that arc intended Loaddress the unsafe conditi

It has been found the possibi lity of missing points of sealant application on

the vapor ban'ier assembly in the wing stub rear box. In the event of fuel

tank leak in this region associated with an unsealed vapor barrier

assembly, migration of flammable vapors and fluids to middle electronic

bay may occur, which then could lead to an uncontained fire event irthe

nammable vapors find an ignition source.

* * * * * *

INI11AIS~'C

. SDlllO~

described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [insert date 45 days after
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.201 Exchange of evidence; Social Security and Department of Veterans Affairs. ( a ) A claimant for dependency and indemnity compensation may elect to furnish to the Department of Veterans Affairs in support of that claim copies of evidence which was previously furnished to the Social Security Administration or to have the Department of Veterans Affairs obtain such evidence from the Social Security Administration. For the purpose of determining the earliest effective date for payment of dependency and indemnity compensation, such evidence will be deemed to have been received by the Department of Veterans Affairs on the date it was received by the Social Security Administration.
( b ) A copy or certification of evidence filed in the Department of Veterans Affairs in support of a claim for dependency and indemnity compensation will be furnished the Social Security Administration upon request from the agency. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a) and 5105)


Cross Reference:
Claims filed with Social Security. See § 3.153. [26 FR 1571, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 58 FR 25562, Apr. 27, 1993]
#### § 21.7500 Establishment and purpose of educational assistance program.

An educational assistance program for certain members of the Selected Reserve is established to encourage membership in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16131(a); Pub. L. 98-525)