alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6626
CYNTHIA ANN ROYAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLAY HESTER, Sheriff; DEPUTY WICKMAN; DEPUTY MASON; DEPUTY SANDER; DEPUTY NICKSON; DEPUTY BENNETT; DEPUTY HAWKS; SERGEANT ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-554-3) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 27, 1996 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Cynthia Ann Royal, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant Cynthia Ann Royal appeals from the magistrate judge's * final judgment denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's final judgment and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Royal v. Hester , No. CA-95-554-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Katharine Friedman, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles Saul, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1900.)

1. Party wall — Removal.

A party wall can be removed only where it has become ruinous, or where either building abutting thereon has become so unsafe that its removal would endanger the entire wall. A removal must be made upon due notice and its necessity must be established by experts.

2. Same — Injunction.

Where an owner had procured an injunction restraining such a removal by his neighbor and it was not clear that the party wall was ruinous before anything had been done towards removing it, the court *53vacated the injunction upon condition that the defendant should protect the plaintiff’s building and give her a bond for any damage she might sustain by the removal.

Motion to vacate an injunction.

Adolph Cohen, for plaintiff.

A. Stem, for defendant.

Leventbitt, J.

It was in effect conceded on the argument, what appears presumptively from the papers, that the wall in question is a party-wall. Rogers v. Sinsheimer, 50 N. Y. 646, 648. The defendant could remove it, therefore, only if the wall had become ruinous, or if either building had become dilapidated or unsafe so that the removal thereof would endanger the entire wall. Partridge v. Lyon, 67 Hun, 29; McAdam Land. & Ten. (2d ed.) 559. In such cases the necessity for reparation must be established by men skilled in the business, and can only be made on due previous notice. Washb. Ease. 612; Campbell v. Mesier, 4 Johns. Ch. 334. The defendant seeks to bring himself within these principles by alleging a proper notice to the plaintiff and by presenting affidavits of various persons tending to show that his building as well as the party-wall were in a ruinous and dilapidated condition. The allegations are often evasive and inconclusive and not sufficiently specific either as to time or locality. It is not quite clear whether the present alleged ruinous condition was not to some extent produced by the partial removal of the wall. At the same time the plaintiff has not seen fit to interpose answering affidavits, so that the defendant’s allegations are practically unchallenged. Should these be established on the trial, according to their most favorable interpretation, the defendant could prevail; but the facts not being fully developed in the papers, the outcome of the trial remains quite uncertain. The burden is on the defendant, and, in the absence of very clear proof of the necessary facts, he should fully protect the plaintiff. As the latter is, according to her complaint, able to specify her damage, I am of the opinion that the rights and interests of all parties will best be subserved by directing the defendant to carry out his expressed willingness of protecting the plaintiff’s building and by giving a bond in the sum of $5,000 to secure the *54payment to her of any damage which she may sustain by reason of the removal of the wall for which the defendant may be liable. Wynkoop v. Van Beuren, 33 N. Y. St. Repr. 994. Upon complying with those conditions the injunction will be vacated, ten dollars costs to abide event.

Ordered accordingly.
#### § 18b.2 Reviewing authority.

The term *reviewing authority* means the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or any person or persons acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Secretary to carry out responsibility under § 18.10 of this chapter. The term includes the Secretary with respect to action under § 18b.75.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Solar Corporation (the Registrant) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W. Brenman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

|      |  |                                                              
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | February 16, 2010                                            
|By:   |  | /s/   DAVIDW. BRENMAN                                        
|     
|      |  | David W. Brenman                                             
|      |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer          
|      |  | (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

---
#### § 46.2 Purpose.

The National Practitioner Data Bank, authorized by the Act and administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, was established for the purpose of collecting and releasing certain information concerning physicians, dentists, and other health care practitioners. The Act mandates that the Department of Health and Human Services seek to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the purpose of having VA participate in the National Practitioner Data Bank. Such a Memorandum of Understanding has been established. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, VA will obtain information from the Data Bank concerning physicians, dentists, and other health care practitioners who provide or seek to provide health care services at VA facilities and also report information regarding malpractice payments and adverse clinical privileges actions to the Data Bank. This part essentially restates or interprets provisions of that Memorandum of Understanding and constitutes the policy of VA for participation in the National Practitioner Data Bank.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RICHARD MIEZE AND LORRAINE MIEZE,

Petitioners

v.

CITY OF PITTSBURGH,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 45 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0192 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM225AD

A330 - 28 - 3113 --- 7/19/11 A340 - 28 -4129 --- 7/19/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 4.40 Functional loss.

Disability of the musculoskeletal system is primarily the inability, due to damage or infection in parts of the system, to perform the normal working movements of the body with normal excursion, strength, speed, coordination and endurance. It is essential that the examination on which ratings are based adequately portray the anatomical damage, and the functional loss, with respect to all these elements. The functional loss may be due to absence of part, or all, of the necessary bones, joints and muscles, or associated structures, or to deformity, adhesions, defective innervation, or other pathology, or it may be due to pain, supported by adequate pathology and evidenced by the visible behavior of the claimant undertaking the motion. Weakness is as important as limitation of motion, and a part which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously disabled. A little used part of the musculoskeletal system may be expected to show evidence of disuse, either through atrophy, the condition of the skin, absence of normal callosity or the like.
Second Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.3 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. 
 DEFERRED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 

(2005 Restatement) 
 The “APOGEE ENTERPRISES,
INC. DEFERRED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN” as adopted by APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and first effective February 27, 1986, and as amended and restated in a document entitled “Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred
Incentive Compensation Plan (2005 Restatement)” effective January 1, 2005 and as amended by a prior amendment is hereby further amended in the following respects: 
 1. EARNINGS ON THE ACCOUNT. Effective December 31, 2009 for elections made by the Participant for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, Section 3.2 of the Plan Statement is amended to
read in full as follows: 
 3.2. Earnings on the Account. The balance of each Participant’s Deferred Compensation Account shall be credited as
a book entry with interest, compounded quarter-annually, on the last day of each quarter of each Fiscal Year, or pro-rata for such lesser period as may occur in the event that the Deferred Compensation Account is credited with deferred compensation
or reduced by a distribution from the Deferred Compensation Account on a day other than the last day of a Fiscal Year quarter. The applicable interest rate in any Fiscal Year shall be determined as of the beginning of each Fiscal Year and shall be
the monthly average yield for the last calendar month of the prior Fiscal Year on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of ten (10) years, as calculated and published by the Federal Reserve Board, or, if the Federal
Reserve Board discontinues its publication of such yields, as calculated by such other source, based upon comparable information, as the Committee may select. 
 2. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as herein expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect. 
  

					
	February 27, 2009	 	APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
			
		 	By	 	 /s/ Russell Huffer

		 		 	Its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the Company);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date: November 3, 2010
    Signature:
    /s/ Gregory B. KalushChief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 269/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5715 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 269

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5715 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 269/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 269/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 269/02 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 2 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 269/02

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF
RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      16,341,760
<SECURITIES>                                 1,246,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,885,441
<PP&E>                                         331,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,239,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          779,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,097,671
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,239,999
<SALES>                                         98,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,003
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,306,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,019,741)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,019,741)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.34)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 234/17 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 234 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5817 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 234

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5817 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 234/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 234/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 234/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 234/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997             SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           2,196                   3,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,076                   6,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                       204                     317
<INVENTORY>                                      7,538                   5,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,594                  16,736
<PP&E>                                           7,975                   4,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,505                   3,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,154                  18,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,503                   7,782
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            54                      53
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,200                  10,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,154                  18,729
<SALES>                                          7,822                   7,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,830                   7,654
<CGS>                                            4,502                   3,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,502                   3,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,036                   3,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65                      17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (773)                     728
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78                     218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (851)                     510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (851)                     510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)                    0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)                    0.09
        

</TABLE>
#### § 77.18 Visits to monitor operations and compliance.

VA has the right, at all reasonable times, to make visits to all grantee locations where a grantee is using adaptive sports grant funds in order to review grantee accomplishments and management control systems and to provide such technical assistance as may be required. VA may conduct inspections of all program locations and records of a grantee at such times as are deemed necessary to determine compliance with the provisions of this part. In the event that a grantee delivers services at a location away from the grantee's place of business, VA may accompany the grantee. If any visit is made by VA on the premises of the grantee or a subcontractor under the adaptive sports grant, the grantee must provide, and must require its subcontractors to provide, all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of the VA representatives in the performance of their duties. All visits and evaluations will be performed in such as manner as will not unduly delay services.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Harary
    Joseph M. Harary
    President, Treasurer
    and Principal Accounting Officer
    August 13, 2003