alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SS.1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, John N. Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**IR
                BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.**Date: November
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                John N.
                FermanisJohn
                N. FermanisChief
                Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
# Official Journal C 200/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 200 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6214 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 200

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6214 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 200/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 200/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 5 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 200/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 200/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 200/03 | State aid — Poland — State aid SA.51502 (2018/N) — Reductions from a capacity mechanism levy for EIUs — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 200/03

State aid — Poland — State aid SA.51502 (2018/N) — Reductions from a capacity mechanism levy for EIUs — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Boundless Motor
Sports Racing, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Thomas L. Earnshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas L. EarnshawThomas L. Earnshaw
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 2, 2005
#### § 21.7633 Suspension or discontinuance of payments.

VA may suspend or discontinue payments of educational assistance. In doing so, VA will apply §§ 21.4210 through 21.4216.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3690)

[63 FR 35837, July 1, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.960 Section 306 and old-law pension protection. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any person eligible to elect improved pension under § 3.711 or 3.712 who is in receipt of section 306 or old-law pension on December 31, 1978, shall in the absence of an election to receive improved pension, continue to receive such pension at the monthly rate payable on December 31, 1978.
( b ) *Termination.* Pension payable under paragraph (a) of this section shall be terminated for any one of the following reasons: ( 1 ) A veteran pensioner ceases to be permanently and totally disabled.
( 2 ) A surviving spouse pensioner ceases to meet the definition of *surviving spouse* in 38 U.S.C. 101(3).
( 3 ) A child pensioner ceases to meet the definition of *child* in 38 U.S.C. 101(4).
( 4 ) A section 306 pensioner's countable annual income, determined under §§ 3.250 to 3.270, exceeds the applicable amount stated in § 3.26(a).
( 5 ) An old-law pensioner's countable annual income determined under §§ 3.250 to 3.270 exceeds the applicable amount stated in § 3.26(c).
( 6 ) A section 306 pensioner has a net worth of such size that it is reasonable that some part of it be consumed for the pensioner's maintenance. Evaluation of net worth shall be made under § 3.263.
( c ) *Reduction.* The pension rate payable under paragraph (a) of this section shall be reduced by the amount of any additional pension payable by reason of a dependent upon the loss of such dependent. A veteran or surviving spouse who no longer has any dependents shall not continue to receive either section 306 pension or old-law pension if countable annual income exceeds the appropriate rate in § 3.26(a), (b), or (c).
( d ) *Finality of termination.* Termination of section 306 pension or old-law pension for one of the reasons listed in paragraph (b) of this section precludes a person from thereafter establishing entitlement under any other pension program except the improved pension program.
(Authority: Sec. 306 of Pub. L. 95-588, 92 Stat. 2497)
[44 FR 45944, Aug. 6, 1979, as amended at 56 FR 28824, June 25, 1991]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.751 Statutory awards; retired service personnel.

Retired Regular and Reserve officers and enlisted personnel are not entitled to statutory awards of disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs in addition to their retirement pay. However, under § 3.750(c), eligible persons may waive an amount equal to the basic disability compensation and any statutory award otherwise payable by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

[41 FR 53797, Dec. 9, 1976]
#### § 77.21 Application of other regulations.

For purposes of this part, the requirements in 38 CFR parts 43 and 49 are superseded by those in 2 CFR part 200.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2021

NO. 03-20-00127-CV

Sandra Tobias and Aaron R. Tobias, Appellants

v.

Joseph David Marks, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 16, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellants shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 31, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Shawn Matthews                                                |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Shawn Matthews                                                    |
|                 |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2489 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2489

  To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the 
         prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

 Mr. Berman (for himself and Mr. Pence) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the 
         prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Genocide Accountability Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. GENOCIDE.

    Section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Required Circumstance for Offenses.--The circumstance 
referred to in subsections (a) and (c) is that--
            ``(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within 
        the United States;
            ``(2) the alleged offender is a national of the United 
        States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(3) the alleged offender is an alien lawfully admitted 
        for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is 
        defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
        (8 U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(4) the alleged offender is a stateless person whose 
        habitual residence is in the United States; or
            ``(5) after the conduct required for the offense occurs, 
        the alleged offender is brought into, or found in, the United 
        States, even if that conduct occurred outside the United 
        States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 14959.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 5, 1963.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., Philip Fusco, Director, 8th Region, N. L. R. B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

George S. Maxwell, F. O. Burkhalter, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.

Before CECIL, Chief Judge, MILLER, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion of February 15, 1963, in this case (6 Cir., 313 F.2d 438), we decreed enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board subject to modification of the order with reference to employees wearing bowling shirts with union insignia inscribed thereon during working hours. We remanded the case to the Board with instructions to fashion an order in accordance with the modification.

The Board has now submitted an order purporting to be in accordance with our modification and a motion for its adoption. Counsel for the respondent filed a motion in opposition to the order submitted by the Board. Included in his motion are alternative provisions for paragraph 1(b) of the order and the paragraph of the notice concerning the wearing of bowling shirts by employees during working hours.

Upon consideration of the motions and the order, we are of the opinion that the alternative provisions submitted by counsel for the respondent more effectively comply with our order of modification than do those submitted by the Board. In the alternative provisions, counsel for the respondent has stricken the words “or any other labor organization.” It is proper to include such language in the order and notice and it should not be stricken. National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corporation et al., 368 U.S. 318, 82 S.Ct. 344, 7 L.Ed.2d 312.

The Board is directed to prepare and submit an amended order using the alternative language suggested by counsel *718for the respondent for paragraph 1(b) of the order and the above described paragraph -of the notice, including the language “or any other labor organization.”

The respondent’s objection to the third paragraph of the notice will be overruled.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50942 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LORETO HERNANDEZ, also known as Laredo Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-517-OG

-------------------- August 31, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Loreto Hernandez argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the facts presented at the suppression hearing show that Border Patrol agents did not have a reasonable suspicion that Hernandez was involved in criminal activity. In the context of the denial of a motion to suppress, we review the district court's factual findings for clear error and the ultimate conclusion, that the facts supported a reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory stop, de novo. United States v. Inocencio , 40 F.3d 716, 721 (5th Cir.No. 99-50942 -2- 1994); United States v. Zapata-Ibarra , 212 F.3d 877, 881-82 (5th Cir. 2000). A roving Border Patrol agent may stop a vehicle if the agent's observations lead him reasonably to suspect that the occupants of a particular vehicle may be involved in criminal activity. See United States v. Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. 873, 881 (1975). The factors to be taken into account in determining whether "reasonable suspicion" exists, include: the characteristics of the area; its proximity to the border; the usual patterns of traffic on a particular road and previous experience with alien traffic; information about recent illegal border crossings; the driver's behavior; and the vehicle's appearance, including the type vehicle, appearance of being heavily loaded, number of passengers, or passengers' behavior. Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. at 884-885. The facts articulated by Agent Dale show a vehicle that was not normally in the area, that was not suited for ranch use, that was the type used by smugglers, that was traveling a known path for contraband, and that was apparently trying to avoid border checkpoints. These facts are specific and were articulated in clear terms. The district court did not err in concluding that all of the specific facts considered together supported the stop.
See United States v. Aldaco , 168 F.3d 148, 150 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Mike McKeever, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be providedunder Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed inthe Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of thereports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation and Computershare Trust Company, National Association. 

Date: March 25, 2022 

 

/s/ Mike McKeever
Mike McKeeverPresidentCarvana Receivables Depositor LLC(senior officer in charge of securitization)**
§ 26.9 Information on and public participation in VA environmental process. ( a ) During the preparation of environmental documents, the responsible VA element shall include the participation of environmental agencies, applicants, State and local governments and the public to the extent practicable and in conformance with CEQ Regulations. Information or status reports on environmental documents shall be provided to interested persons upon request.
( b ) Notice of availability or filing requirements vary, depending on the type of environmental documents requested. Specific requirements and procedures are defined for each VA element.
( c ) For those actions relating specifically to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Office of Environmental Affairs, or a VA element, information is available by writing to the Director, Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321-4370a)
718 A.2d 211

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. James M. SLATTERY.

Misc. (Subtitle AG) No. 26,

Sept. Term., 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 22, 1998.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, James M. Slattery, Esquire that the Respondent be indefinitely suspended by consent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 22nd day of September, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, James M. Slattery, be and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that, prior to any petition for reinstatement, Respondent must meet the following conditions:

> 1. He shall continue to abstain from consumption of alcoholic beverages;

> 2. He shall participate in such rehabilitative activities as may be prescribed from time to time by Bar Counsel and the Director of the Lawyer Counseling Program of the Maryland State Bar Association;

> 8. He shall pay costs incurred in connection with this proceeding in the amount of $1,061.40; and it is further

ORDERED, that, should Respondent be reinstated in the future, such reinstatement be conditioned upon Respondent being monitored for a period of two (2) years by Richard Vincent, Director of Lawyer Counseling for the Maryland State Bar Association, and a practice monitor acceptable to Bar Counsel and these monitors shall submit reports on at *241least a quarterly basis or such shorter period as directed by Bar Counsel; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James M. Slattery from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
§ 79.30 Threshold requirements prior to scoring legal services grant applicants. VA will only score applicants that meet the following threshold requirements: ( a ) The application is filed within the time period established in the NOFO, and any additional information or documentation requested by VA under § 79.25(c) is provided within the time frame established by VA;
( b ) The application is completed in all parts;
( c ) The activities for which the legal services grant is requested are eligible for funding under this part;
( d ) The applicant's prospective participants are eligible to receive legal services under this part;
( e ) The applicant agrees to comply with the requirements of this part;
( f ) The applicant does not have an outstanding obligation to the Federal Government that is in arrears and does not have an overdue or unsatisfactory response to an audit; and
( g ) The applicant is not in default by failing to meet the requirements for any previous Federal assistance.