Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices 49907 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

4See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57323 

(February 13, 2008), 73 FR 9371 (February 20, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–09). 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57826 

(May 15, 2008), 73 FR 29802 (May 22, 2008) (SR– 

NASDAQ–2007–001). 

6See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58328 

(August 8, 2008), 73 FR 47247 (August 13, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–63). 

7See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58732 

(October 3, 2008), 73 FR 61183 (October 15, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–99). 

8See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59255 

(January 15, 2009) 74 FR 4496 (January 26, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–02). 

9See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59581 

(March 9, 2009) 74 FR 12431 (March 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–26). 

10See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59838 

(April 28, 2009) 74 FR 20767 (May 5, 2009) (SR– 

NYSEArca-2009–36) (See NYSE Arca Rule 7.10). 

sending an e-mail to: 

Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) 

Charles Boucher, Director/Chief 

Information Officer, Securities and 

Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley 

Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, 

Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail 

to PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments 

must be submitted within 30 days of 

this notice. 

Dated: September 23, 2009. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–23494 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–60712; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2009–97] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice 

of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness 

of Proposed Rule Change by New York 

Stock Exchange LLC Extending Until 

October 4, 2009, the Operation of 

Interim NYSE Rule 128 Which Permits 

the Exchange To Cancel or Adjust 

Clearly Erroneous Executions If They 

Arise Out of the Use or Operation of 

Any Quotation, Execution or 

Communication System Owned or 

Operated by the Exchange, Including 

Those Executions That Occur in the 

Event of a System Disruption or 

System Malfunction 

September 23, 2009. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on 

September 22, 2009, New York Stock 

Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the proposed 

rule change as described in Items I and 

II below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. NYSE has 

designated the proposed rule change as 

constituting a rule change under Rule 

19b–4(f)(6) under the Act,3 which 

renders the proposal effective upon 

filing with the Commission. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to extend 

until October 4, 2009, the operation of 

interim NYSE Rule 128 (‘‘Clearly 

Erroneous Executions for NYSE 

Equities’’) which permits the Exchange 

to cancel or adjust clearly erroneous 

executions if they arise out of the use or 

operation of any quotation, execution or 

communication system owned or 

operated by the Exchange, including 

those executions that occur in the event 

of a system disruption or system 

malfunction. The text of the proposed 

rule change is available at the Exchange, 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room, and http://www.nyse.com. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to extend 

until October 4, 2009, the operation of 

interim NYSE Rule 128 (‘‘Clearly 

Erroneous Executions for NYSE 

Equities’’) which permits the Exchange 

to cancel or adjust clearly erroneous 

executions if they arise out of the use or 

operation of any quotation, execution or 

communication system owned or 

operated by the Exchange, including 

those executions that occur in the event 

of a system disruption or system 

malfunction. 

Prior to the implementation of NYSE 

Rule 128 on January 28, 2008,4 the 

NYSE did not have a rule providing the 

Exchange with the authority to cancel or 

adjust clearly erroneous trades of 

securities executed on or through the 

systems and facilities of the NYSE. 

In order for the NYSE to be consistent 

with other national securities exchanges 

which have some version of a clearly 

erroneous execution rule, the Exchange 

is drafting an amended clearly 

erroneous rule which will accommodate 

such other exchanges but will be 

appropriate for the NYSE market model. 

The NYSE notes that the Commission 

approved an amended clearly erroneous 

execution rule for Nasdaq in May 2008.5

On July 28, 2008, the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

October 1, 2008 6 in order to review the 

provisions of Nasdaq’s clearly erroneous 

rule and to consider integrating similar 

standards into its own amendment to 

Rule 128. On October 1, 2008,7 the 

Exchange filed with the SEC a further 

request to extend the operation of 

interim Rule 128 until January 9, 2009 

in order to consider integrating similar 

standards into the amendment to Rule 

128. On January 9, 2009,8 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

March 9, 2009, indicating that the 

Exchange was still in the process of 

reviewing the Nasdaq rule with a view 

towards incorporating certain 

provisions into the amendment of 

interim Rule 128. 

On February 10, 2009, NYSE Arca 

submitted a proposal to the SEC to 

amend its clearly erroneous rule. The 

NYSE Arca proposed rule differed in 

certain respects from the Nasdaq clearly 

erroneous rule. On March 9, 2009, the 

Exchange filed with the SEC a request 

to extend the operation of interim Rule 

128 until June 9, 2009 9 to finalize 

review of NYSE Arca’s proposed 

amended CEE rule, which included 

market wide CEE initiatives, to 

determine if it was appropriate to 

incorporate such provisions into the 

Rule 128 amendment. 

Thereafter, on April 24, 2009, NYSE 

Arca filed a revised rule change with the 

Commission to amend its clearly 

erroneous rule (NYSE Arca Rule 7.10).10

The Exchange was in the process of 

finalizing its review of NYSE Arca’s 

revised CEE rule change, which also 

included market wide CEE initiatives, to 

determine if it was appropriate to 

incorporate all such provisions into 

NYSE’s interim Rule 128 amendment. 

On June 9, 2009, the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
49908 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices 

11See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60131 

(June 17, 2009) 74 FR 30196 (June 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–57). 

12See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60312 

(July 15, 2009) 74 FR 36298 (July 22, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–70). 

13See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60419 

(August 7, 2009) 74 FR 39987 (August 10, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–79). 

14See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60478 

(August 11, 2009) 74 FR 41769 (August 18, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–81). 

15See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60563 

(August 21, 2009) 74 FR 44423 (August 28, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–87). 

16See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60597 

(August 31, 2009) 74 FR 46281 (September 8, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–92). 

17See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60649 

(September 10, 2009) 74 FR 47846 (September 17, 

2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–93). 

18See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60678 

(September 16, 2009) 74 FR 48330 (September 22, 

2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–95). 

19 15 U.S.C. 78f(a) [sic]. 

20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

21 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

22 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 

4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give 

the Commission written notice of its intent to file 

the proposed rule change at least five business days 

prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 

change, or such shorter time as designated by the 

Commission. The Commission has determined to 

waive the five-day pre-filing period in this case. 

23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

24 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

25For purposes only of waiving the 30-day 

operative delay, the Commission has considered the 

proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, 

and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 

operation of interim Rule 128 until July 

15, 2009 11 to finalize review of NYSE 

Arca’s proposed amended CEE rule. On 

July 15, 2009 12 the Exchange filed with 

the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 1, 2009 to finalize review of 

NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. On July 31, 2009 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 10, 2009 13 to finalize review of 

NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. On August 11, 2009 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 21, 2009 14 to finalize review of 

NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. On August 21, 2009 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 31, 2009 15 to finalize review of 

NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. On August 31, 2009 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

September 8, 2009 16 to finalize review 

of NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. On September 8, 2009 the 

Exchange filed with the SEC a request 

to extend the operation of interim Rule 

128 until September 15, 2009 17 to 

finalize review of NYSE Arca’s 

proposed amended CEE rule. On 

September 15, 2009 the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

September 22, 2009 18 to finalize review 

of NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule. 

The Exchange anticipates finalizing 

proposed rule text of its clearly 

erroneous execution rule shortly, and is, 

therefore, requesting to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

October 4, 2009. Prior to October 4, 

2009, the Exchange intends to formally 

file a 19b–4 rule change amending 

interim Rule 128. 

1. Statutory Basis 

The basis under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 19 for 

this proposed rule change is the 

requirement under Section 6(b)(5) 20

that an Exchange have rules that are 

designed to promote just and equitable 

principles of trade, to remove 

impediments to and perfect the 

mechanism of a free and open market 

and a national market system and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest. 

As articulated more fully in the 

‘‘Purpose’’ Section above, the proposed 

rule would place the NYSE on equal 

footing with other national securities 

exchanges. This will promote the 

integrity of the market and protect the 

public interest, since it would permit all 

exchanges to cancel or adjust clearly 

erroneous trades when such trades 

occur, rather than canceling them on all 

other markets, but leaving them 

standing on only one market. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Because the foregoing proposed rule 

change does not: (i) Significantly affect 

the protection of investors or the public 

interest; (ii) impose any significant 

burden on competition; and (iii) become 

operative for 30 days from the date on 

which it was filed, or such shorter time 

as the Commission may designate, it has 

become effective pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 21 and Rule 19b– 

4(f)(6) thereunder.22

A proposed rule change filed 

pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the 

Act 23 normally does not become 

operative for 30 days after the date of its 

filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 24

permits the Commission to designate a 

shorter time if such action is consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

public interest. NYSE requests that the 

Commission waive the 30-day operative 

delay because the Exchange believes 

that the absence of such a rule in an 

automated and fast-paced trading 

environment poses a danger to the 

integrity of the markets and the public 

interest. NYSE notes that immediate 

effectiveness of the proposed rule 

change will immediately and timely 

enable NYSE to cancel or adjust clearly 

erroneous trades that may present a risk 

to the integrity of the equities markets 

and all related markets. The 

Commission believes that waiving the 

30-day operative delay 25 is consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

public interest because such waiver will 

permit the Exchange to continue 

operation of interim NYSE Rule 128 on 

an uninterrupted basis, and therefore 

designates the proposal operative upon 

filing. 

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission may summarily abrogate 

such rule change if it appears to the 

Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–97 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices 49909 

26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–97. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for inspection and copying in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, 

DC 20549, on official business days 

between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. 

Copies of such filings also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of the Exchange. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make publicly available. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–97 and should 

be submitted on or before October 20, 

2009. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.26

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–23491 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 6773] 

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to 

the Central Government of Uzbekistan 

Related to Budget Transparency 

Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the 

Department of State, Foreign 

Operations, and Related Programs 

Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 

Pub. L. 111–8) (‘‘the Act’’), and 

Department of State Delegation of 

Authority Number 245–1, I hereby 

determine that it is important to the 

national interest of the United States to 

waive the requirements of section 

7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the 

Government of Uzbekistan, and I hereby 

waive such restriction. 

This determination shall be reported 

to the Congress and published in the 

Federal Register. 

Dated: September 17, 2009. 

Jacob J. Lew, 

Deputy Secretary of State for Management 

and Resources, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. E9–23493 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–46–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Bureau of the Public Debt 

Proposed Collection: Comment 

Request 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A). Currently the Bureau of 

the Public Debt within the Department 

of the Treasury is soliciting comments 

concerning the Release. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before November 16, 

2009, to be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Bureau of the Public Debt, Judi 

Owens, 200 Third Street, A4–A, 

Parkersburg, WV 26106–1328, or e-mail 

to Judi.Owens@bpd.treas.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the form and instructions 

should be directed to Judi Owens, 

Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third 

Street, A4–A, Parkersburg, WV 26106– 

1328, (304) 480–8150. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Release. 

OMB Number: 1535–0114. 

Form Number: PD F 2001. 

Abstract: The information is 

requested to ratify payment of savings 

bonds/notes and release the United 

States of America from any liability. 

Current Actions: None. 

Type of Review: Extension. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

200. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 6 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 20. 

Request for Comments: Comments 

submitted in response to this notice will 

be summarized and/or included in the 

request for OMB approval. All 

comments will become a matter of 

public record. Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the collection of 

information; (c) ways to enhance 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology; and (e) estimates of capital 

or start-up costs and costs of operation, 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

to provide information. 

Dated: September 15, 2009. 

Judi Owens, 

Manager, Information Management. 

[FR Doc. E9–23424 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–39–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 1138 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13(44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

1138, Extension of Time for Payment of 

Taxes by a Corporation Expecting a New 

Operating Loss Carryback. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before November 30, 

2009 to be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to R. Joseph Durbala, Internal Revenue 

Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES