alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              75
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                       199
<INVENTORY>                                      1,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,435
<PP&E>                                           7,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,489
<BONDS>                                          3,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,825
<SALES>                                          7,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,586
<CGS>                                            5,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (17)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN WOODSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 253 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of February, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
STATE OF JEFFERSON SURVEYING, LLC – AMMENDMENT ADDING ADDITIONAL UAS Page 1 of 2

January 27, 2016

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) 

Re: Addendum to Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

State of Jefferson Surveying, Inc., has prepared the following addendum to our Exemption #13561. This 

addendum allows for the inclusion of the following additional UAS 

Systems to Add Prior Exemptions 

DJI Phantom 3 Professional 14192, 13697, 13696

DJI Inspire 1 Pro 14416, 14116, 14331

DJI Matrice 13076, 12697, 12378

3DR Solo 13102, 13113, 13126

Aibotix X6 14190, 13604, 11545

Aeryon SkyRanger 12423, 12073, 11265

Riegl RiCopter 13576, 13212, 11581

Each system was previously approved for similar purposes and therefore would not set a precedent. 

This Addendum makes no other changes to the currently approved exemption #13561 reasons for 

exemption request, and/or operating parameters.

The name and contact information of the applicant remains the same: 

Sincerely,

Brian Christensen

President

State of Jefferson Surveying, Inc.

Phone: 530 340-0814

Email: brian@sojsurveying.com

Appendix A – Users Manuals
STATE OF JEFFERSON SURVEYING, LLC – APPENDIX A – USERS MANUALS

APPENDIX A – USERS MANUALS

Users Manuals and/or documentation for each of these systems can be downloaded here. 

State of Jefferson Surveying, LLC will keep the most current copy with each UAS.

DJI Phantom 3 Professional

DJI Inspire 1 Pro

DJI Matrice

3DR Solo

Aibotix X6

Aeryon SkyRanger

Riegl RiCopter
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           30408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1325414
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                    4518001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6735480
<PP&E>                                         4083529
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2320942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9975444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2757175
<BONDS>                                         330219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2691840
<PREFERRED>                                    2691840
<COMMON>                                      10523634
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9975444
<SALES>                                        4119476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4119476
<CGS>                                          2603005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2603005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1089935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 411441
<INCOME-TAX>                                    157847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             253594
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    253594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
#### § 79.115 Legal services grant closeout procedures.

Legal services grants will be closed out in accordance with 2 CFR part 200.
§ 488.68 State Agency responsibilities for OASIS collection and data base requirements. As part of State agency survey responsibilities, the State agency or other entity designated by CMS has overall responsibility for fulfilling the following requirements for operating the OASIS system: ( a ) *Establish and maintain an OASIS database.* The State agency or other entity designated by CMS must— ( 1 ) Use a standard system developed or approved by CMS to collect, store, and analyze data;
( 2 ) Conduct basic system management activities including hardware and software maintenance, system back-up, and monitoring the status of the database; and
( 3 ) Obtain CMS approval before modifying any parts of the CMS standard system including, but not limited to, standard CMS-approved— ( i ) OASIS data items;
( ii ) Record formats and validation edits; and
( iii ) Agency encoding and transmission methods.
( b ) *Analyze and edit OASIS data.* The State agency or other entity designated by CMS must— ( 1 ) Upon receipt of data from an HHA, edit the data as specified by CMS and ensure that the HHA resolves errors within the limits specified by CMS;
( 2 ) At least monthly, make available for retrieval by CMS all edited OASIS records received during that period, according to formats specified by CMS, and correct and retransmit previously rejected data as needed; and
( 3 ) Analyze data and generate reports as specified by CMS.
( c ) *Ensure accuracy of OASIS data.* The State agency must audit the accuracy of the OASIS data through the survey process.
( d ) *Restrict access to OASIS data.* The State agency or other entity designated by CMS must do the following: ( 1 ) Ensure that access to data is restricted except for the transmission of data and reports to— ( i ) CMS;
( ii ) The State agency component that conducts surveys for purposes related to this function; and
( iii ) Other entities if authorized by CMS.
( 2 ) Ensure that patient identifiable OASIS data is released only to the extent that it is permitted under the Privacy Act of 1974.
( e ) *Provide training and technical support for HHAs.* The State agency or other entity designated by CMS must— ( 1 ) Instruct each HHA on the administration of the data set, privacy/confidentiality of the data set, and integration of the OASIS data set into the facility's own record keeping system;
( 2 ) Instruct each HHA on the use of software to encode and transmit OASIS data to the State;
( 3 ) Specify to a facility the method of transmission of data to the State, and instruct the facility on this method.
( 4 ) Monitor each HHA's ability to transmit OASIS data.
( 5 ) Provide ongoing technical assistance and general support to HHAs in implementing the OASIS reporting requirements specified in the conditions of participation for home health agencies; and
( 6 ) Carry out any other functions as designated by CMS necessary to maintain OASIS data on the standard State system.
[64 FR 3763, Jan. 25, 1999]
# Official Journal L 140/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 140 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4929 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 140

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4929 May 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 October 2004 on the State aid partly implemented by France for the ‘Sernam’ company
  (notified under document number C(2004)3940)

   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 March 2006 on the detailed technical requirements for carrying out the tests specified in Directive 2005/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the use of frontal protection systems on motor vehicles
  (notified under document number C(2006) 776)

   (1) | 33 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 20 October 2004 on the State aid partly implemented by France for the ‘Sernam’ company
  (notified under document number C(2004)3940)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2004)3940)

1

*

Commission Decision of 20 March 2006 on the detailed technical requirements for carrying out the tests specified in Directive 2005/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the use of frontal protection systems on motor vehicles
  (notified under document number C(2006) 776)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 776)

33

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

p0616 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

136956 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136956 

 COA: 278189 

St. Joseph CC: 06-013718-FC 

LARRY EUGENE WILCOX, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue 

whether the legislative sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.1 et seq., applied to the 

defendant’s sentence and, if so, whether the defendant is entitled to be resentenced. The 

parties may wish to compare the result in this case with the result in People v Walton, 

unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued June 3, 2008 (Docket 

No. 276161). 

We further ORDER the St. Joseph Circuit Court, in accordance with 

Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, 

to appoint counsel to represent the defendant in this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would also grant leave to appeal with respect to the defendant’s 

challenge to the constitutionality of MCL 768.27a, for the reasons set forth in her 

dissenting statement in People v Xiong, 483 Mich ___ (Docket No. 135158, order entered 

April 17, 2009).
#### §§ 20.1005-20.1099 [Reserved]
#### § 1070.44 Disclosure of confidential consumer complaint information.

The CFPB may, to the extent permitted by law, disclose confidential consumer complaint information as it deems necessary to investigate, resolve, or otherwise respond to consumer complaints or inquiries concerning consumer financial products and services or a violation of Federal consumer financial law.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.318 Presumptive service connection for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis manifested at any time after discharge or release from active military, naval, air, or space service is sufficient to establish service connection for that disease.
( b ) Service connection will not be established under this section: ( 1 ) If there is affirmative evidence that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was not incurred during or aggravated by active military, naval, or air service;
( 2 ) If there is affirmative evidence that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is due to the veteran's own willful misconduct; or
( 3 ) If the veteran did not have active, continuous service of 90 days or more.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a)(1))
[73 FR 54693, Sept. 23, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 26126, May 3, 2022]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: November 7, 2007 | /s/GERARD E. PUORROGerard E. Puorro President and Chief
Executive Officer
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5854-5855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01711]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Application of Scott Air, LLC for Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause (Order 2013-1-12), Docket DOT-
OST-2012-0178.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Scott 
Air, LLC fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
February 1, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2012-0178 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed 
in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine J. OToole, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

[[Page 5855]]

    Dated: January 18, 2013.
Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013-01711 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
§ 77.16 Grantee reporting requirements. ( a ) *Annual report.* All grantees must submit to VA, not later than 60 days after the last day of the Federal fiscal year for which a grant is provided under this part, an annual report which sets forth the following information for that fiscal year: ( 1 ) A detailed record of the time involved in providing adaptive sports activities through direct personal interaction with participants and time expended in adaptive sports activities that do not involve direct personal interaction with participants;
( 2 ) A detailed record of the individual adaptive sports activities conducted;
( 3 ) A detailed record of the adaptive sports programs carried out at the national and local levels through partnerships with VA, DoD, VSOs, and other adaptive sports entities;
( 4 ) The number of veterans and the number of participants in the adapted sports activities funded by the grant including those who participated in any programs carried out through a partnership under this part;
( 5 ) The locations where adaptive sports activities were conducted; and
( 6 ) A detailed accounting of how the grant funds were used including the administrative and personnel expenses incurred by the grantee in carrying out the program and such expenses paid for using grant funds.
( b ) *Quarterly report.* All grantees must submit to VA a quarterly report 30 days after the close of each Federal fiscal quarter of the grant period which includes the same information required for annual reports, as well as projected change requests if applicable.
( c ) *Program variations.* Any changes in a grantee's program activities which result in deviations from the grant agreement must be reported to VA.
( d ) *Additional reporting.* Additional reporting requirements may be requested by VA to allow VA to fully assess program effectiveness.
( e ) *Annual report compliance.* If a grantee does not submit the annual report required under this section for any fiscal year, the grantee shall not be eligible to receive a grant under this part for the subsequent fiscal year.
(OMB has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0820) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 521A(j))
[79 FR 37217, July 1, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 25235, May 4, 2015]
§ 1071.104 Standards for awards. ( a ) For a prevailing party: ( 1 ) An eligible prevailing applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred after initiation of the adversary adjudication in connection with the entire adversary adjudication, or on a substantive portion of the adversary adjudication that is sufficiently significant and discrete to merit treatment as a separate unit, unless the position of the Bureau was substantially justified. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible prevailing applicant because the Bureau's position was substantially justified is on counsel for the Bureau. However, no presumption arises that the Bureau's position was not substantially justified simply because the Bureau did not prevail.
( 2 ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceeding or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
( b ) For a party defending against an excessive demand: ( 1 ) An eligible applicant will receive an award for fees and expenses incurred after initiation of the adversary adjudication related to defending against the portion of a Bureau demand that is substantially in excess of the decision of the adjudicative officer and is unreasonable when compared with that decision under all the facts and circumstances of the case.
( 2 ) An award will be denied if the applicant has committed a willful violation of law or otherwise acted in bad faith or if special circumstances make an award unjust.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (475)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,790
<PP&E>                                             281
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (215)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                         564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>