alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 123A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.123.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 123A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 523 June 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.123.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 123A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 523 June 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 123A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fifth supplement to the 27th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 123A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fifth supplement to the 27th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
AAM-10-292-E 

June 14, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10080 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0568 

Mr. William Pearson 

Owner 

Coastal Aviation 

700 Airport Road 

Mount Pleasant, SC 29466 

Dear Mr. Pearson: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Coastal Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Coastal Aviation, which is 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Coastal Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Coastal Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the extent 

necessary to allow Coastal Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Coastal Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

 Coastal Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 20, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
----

(2004/C 84 E/0302)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3858/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Invalidity pensions in the European Union

It transpires from the Court of Auditors' Special Report 3/2003 (1), on the invalidity pensions scheme of the European institutions, that in 2001, 0,78 % of the European Communities' staff retired due to invalidity.

Could the Commission state the percentage of staff awarded invalidity pensions in 2002, and what checks and controls have been undertaken?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(11 February 2004)

In 2002 invalidity pensions were awarded to 1,1 % of Commission staff (officials and temporary agents).

In those instances where, in its decision granting invalidity, the Invalidity Committee recommend that checks are necessary, they are carried out systematically until the former official reaches the age of 60 (in accordance with Article 15 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations).

Every individual official subject to such checks is required to undergo an in-depth examination by the medical service. If deemed appropriate, that examination is complemented by a further analysis carried out by external experts.

In 2002, 154 such checks were carried out. Three officials were reinstated during this period.

The attention of the Honourable Member is drawn to the reply by the Commission to the special report from the Court of Auditors 3/2003, in which the Commission announced its intention of developing an overall policy aimed at both preventing invalidity and helping and encouraging rehabilitation, and to inform the Parliament of the results of its work.

----

(1)OJ C 109, 7.5.2003, p. 1.

----
§ 61.50 Technical assistance grants—general. ( a ) *General.* VA provides technical assistance grants to entities or organizations with expertise in preparing grant applications relating to the provision of assistance for homeless veterans. The recipients must use the grants to provide technical assistance to nonprofit organizations with experience in providing assistance to homeless veterans in order to help such groups apply for grants under this part, or from any other source, for addressing the needs of homeless veterans. Current recipients of any grant under this part (other than a technical assistance grant), or their sub-recipients, are ineligible for technical assistance grants.
( b ) *Allowable activities.* Technical assistance grant recipients may use grant funds for the following activities: ( 1 ) Group or individual “how-to” grant writing seminars, providing instructions on applying for a grant. Topics must include: ( i ) Determining eligibility;
( ii ) Matching the awarding agency's grant mission to the applicant agency's strengths;
( iii ) Meeting the specific grant outcome requirements;
( iv ) Creating measurable goals and objectives for grants;
( v ) Relating clear and concise grant project planning;
( vi ) Ensuring appropriate grant project staffing; and
( vii ) Demonstrating the applicant's abilities.
( 2 ) Creation and dissemination of “how-to” grant writing materials, *i.e.*, compact disks, booklets, web pages or other media specifically designed to facilitate and instruct applicants in the completion of grant applications.
( 3 ) Group or individual seminars, providing instructions on the legal obligations associated with grant applications. Topics must include: ( i ) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards under 2 CFR part 200;
( ii ) Federal funding match and fund separation requirements; and
( iii ) Property and equipment disposition.
( 4 ) Telephone, video conferencing or email with potential grant applicants that specifically address grant application questions.
( c ) *Unallowable activities.* Technical assistance grant recipients may not use grant funds for the following activities: ( 1 ) Meetings, consortia, or any similar activity that does not assist community agencies in seeking grants to aid homeless veterans.
( 2 ) Referral of individual veterans to agencies for benefits, housing, medical assistance, or social services.
( 3 ) Lobbying.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 and 2064)
[78 FR 12604, Feb. 25, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 43323, July 22, 2015]
41800.

#### FLEMING v. THE STATE.

Submitted February 8, 1966

Decided February 11, 1966.

*Lewis & Javetz, Emanuel Lewis,*for appellant.

*Andreio J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Robert E. Barker,*for appellee.

Deen, Judge.

1. *Code*§ 27-2510 provides that all sentences pronounced in criminal cases shall be served concurrently “unless otherwise specifically provided therein.” Whether a sentence is to be served concurrently with or consecutively to another previously passed on the defendant and which he is engaged in serving at the time is, accordingly, a part of the second sentence, and where the court stipulates that it shall “run consecutively to any other sentence heretofore imposed upon this defendant in the State of Georgia” this provision, too, is a part of the sentence and should be pronounced in the presence of the defendant. Sec *Chastain v. State,*75 Ga. App. 880, 884 (45 SE2d 81).

2. However, a judgment of conviction will not be reversed and a new trial granted because of an error or irregularity in the manner of sentencing; the remedy is for the court to recall the defendant and sentence him as provided by law. *King v. State,*103 Ga. App. 272 (3) (119 SE2d 77); *Heard v. Gill,*204 Ga. 261 (491 SE2d 656); *Peppers v. Balkcom,*218 Ga. 749 (2c) (130 SE2d 709). The case is therefore remanded with direction that the defendant be sentenced in accordance with law.

*Judgment affirmed and case remanded with direction that the defendant be resentenced.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly
Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company")  on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report") , I, Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer
and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.


/s/  Joseph M. Harary
     Joseph M. Harary
     President, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
     October 28, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-1
# Official Journal L 271/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.271.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 271 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 555 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.271.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 271

English edition

Legislation

Volume 555 October 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2012 of 4 October 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/538/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 24 September 2012 appointing a Maltese alternate member of the Committee of the Regions | 3 |
| | | 2012/539/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 26 September 2012 exempting the production and wholesale of electricity produced from conventional sources in macro-zone north and macro-zone south in Italy from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sector and amending Commission Decision 2010/403/EU
  (notified under document C(2012) 6665)

   (1) | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2012 of 4 October 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

2012/538/EU

*

Council Decision of 24 September 2012 appointing a Maltese alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

3

2012/539/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 26 September 2012 exempting the production and wholesale of electricity produced from conventional sources in macro-zone north and macro-zone south in Italy from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sector and amending Commission Decision 2010/403/EU
  (notified under document C(2012) 6665)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 6665)

4

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Cecilio M. Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of Commonwealth Credit Partners BDC I, Inc., certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Credit Partners BDC I,Inc.;

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 
b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: March 25, 2022/s/ Cecilio M. RodriguezCecilio M. Rodriguez**
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document^umber: 

# $l26gfll-F- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:12 AM

Sheet 252 of 264I 

### P. 2 

# tt'-P- 1 Ki m Tea l To : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EP A 07/18/200 0 04:1 7 PIV

1 cc : Subject : Re : Plasti cPart s Definitio n Questio n FYI ! Applicabilityofth e plasti c part s standar d t o reduce multipl e requirement s o n singl e operation . Forwarde d b

yKi m Teal/RTP/USEPA/U S o n 07/18/200 0 04:1 0 P M Kim Tea l To : HetheG@mail01.dnr.state.wi.u s

, .7/18/200 0 09:2 7 A M cc : Subject : Re : Plasti cPart s Definitio n Questio n



# . t Mr . Hetherington , Plasti c Parts & Product s (Surfac e Coating ) NESHA P i s not coverin g th e manufactur e (fabrication ) ofplasti c part s & products . W e ar e onl ycoverin g "coating " (e.g. , paints , caulks , sealants , adhesives , etc. ) applie d t o a plasti c par t o rproduct post-fabricatio n o rpost-mold . I hope thi s helps ; let m e kno wi fI ca n b e o ffurthe rassistance . Sincerely , Ki m R. Tea l Environmenta l Protectio n Specialist U.S . EPA/OAR/OAQPS/ESD/CCP G (MD-13 ) Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 (919)541-558 0 (919)541-5689-FA X teal.kim@epa.go v
HetheG@mail0 1 .dnr.state.wi.u s

HetheG@mail01.dnr.s

t To : Ki m Teal/RTP/USEPA/US@EP A ate.wi.u s 07/18/200 0 08:5 9 A M cc : Subject : Plasti cPart

s Definitio n Questio n

Ms . Teal : I hav e anothe rquestio n pertainin g t o plasti c part s coating . I s polyurethan e foa m considere d a plasti c part ? Apparently , i t i s manufacture d unde ra rang e ofpressure s dependin g o n desire d characteristic s o fth e foam . Then , i t ca n b

e cu t int o pieces fo rproduct s suc h as seat cushions .

# w P. 3

Thanks , Gran t D
. Hetheringto n Wisconsi n Departmen t o fNatura l Resource s Burea u o fAi rManagemen t Ozon e Sectio n 

### (608 ) 267-753 9
§ 39.84 Application requirements. For an Operation and Maintenance Project to be considered for grant funding under this subpart, the State or Tribal Organization must submit an application (as opposed to a preapplication) consisting of the following: ( a ) Standard Form 424 (Application for Federal Assistance) with the box labeled “application” marked;
( b ) Standard Form 424C (Budget Information), which documents the amount of funds requested based on the construction costs as estimated by the successful construction bid;
( c ) A copy of itemized bid tabulations; and
( d ) Standard Form 424D (Assurances—Construction Program).
( e ) VA Form 40-0895-11 (Memorandum of Agreement for a Grant to Construct or Modify a State or Tribal Government Veterans Cemetery) to identify the parties (VA and applicant), identify the scope of the project, and indicate how the grant award funds will be paid to the applicant.
( f ) VA Form 40-0895-12 (Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions (Contractor)) to ensure that the contractor has not been debarred or suspended, and is eligible to participate in the VA grant process and receive Federal funds.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control numbers 4040-0002, 4040-0008, 4040-0009, and 2900-0559) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4478, Jan. 30, 2012]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2276 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2276

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, as the ``Corporal 
            Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2007

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, as the ``Corporal 
            Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTOPHER E. ESCKELSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```