alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO 
 THE CHOICE
HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 2006 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 

The 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective February 27, 2015, as follows: 

A. Section 1.02 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 

“Effective Date and Duration of Plan. Unless terminated earlier by the Board, this Plan is effective until February 13, 2018.
Any Awards that are made under the Plan prior to the termination date shall continue in effect in accordance with the terms of the Agreement after that date.” 

B. Section 9.04(d) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 

“(d) To the extent consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee (i) may appropriately establish performance
criteria that either disregards or takes into account the effects of charges for restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and all items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or related to
the disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting principle all as determined in accordance with standards established by opinion No. 30 of the Accounting Principles Board or other applicable or successor accounting
provisions, as well as the cumulative effect of accounting changes, in each case as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or identified in the Company’s financial statements or notes to the financial statements,
and (ii) may appropriately establish performance criteria that either includes or excludes gains and losses related to any of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (A) the sale of assets, (B) litigation,
claims, judgments or settlements, (C) the effect of changes in tax law or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, (D) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs, (E) accruals of any amounts for payment
under this Plan or any other compensation arrangement maintained by the Company, and (F) investments in or expenses related to new lines of business or non-core business initiatives that were unbudgeted at the time the performance criteria was
established.” 
 Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect.
§ 1012.40 Processing of filings. ( a ) Statements of Record and accompanying filing fees will be received on behalf of the Director by the Office of Supervision Examinations, for determination of whether the criteria set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section have been satisfied. Where it appears that all three criteria are satisfied and it is otherwise practicable, acceleration of the effectiveness of the Statement of Record will normally be granted. ( 1 ) Completeness of the statement
( 2 ) Adequacy of the filing fee, and
( 3 ) Adequacy of disclosure.
( b ) Filings intended as Statements of Record but which do not comply in form with §§ 1010.105 and 1010.120 of this chapter, whichever is applicable, and Statements of Record accompanied by inadequate filing fees will not be effective to accomplish any purpose under the Act. At the discretion of the Interstate Land Sales Registration Program, such filings and any moneys accompanying them may be immediately returned to the sender or after notification may be held pending the sender's appropriate response.
( c ) Persons filing incomplete or inaccurate Statements of Record will be notified of the deficiencies therein by the Suspension Notice procedure described in § 1010.45(a) of this chapter.
[76 FR 79524, Dec. 21, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 29119, May 11, 2016]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 495/2006

of 27 March 2006         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2006 for import licences for certain egg sector products and poultrymeat pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 593/2004 and (EC) No 1251/96 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 593/2004 of 30 March 2004 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quotas in the egg sector and for egg albumin (1), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 of 28 June 1996 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas in the poultrymeat sector and albumin (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 April to 30 June 2006 are, in the case of certain products, for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said applications are for quantities greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 593/2004 and (EC) No 1251/96 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 10.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 136. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

----

ANNEX

----
#### § 20.100 Rule 100. Establishment of the Board.

The Board of Veterans' Appeals is established by authority of, and functions pursuant to, title 38, United States Code, chapter 71.

[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated at 84 FR 177, Jan. 18, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 180, Jan. 18, 2019]
# Official Journal L 336/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 336 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5722 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 336

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5722 November 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1209/2014 of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 451/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a new statistical classification of products by activity (CPA) and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3696/93 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1209/2014 of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 451/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a new statistical classification of products by activity (CPA) and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3696/93 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 8.6 Calculation of Time Period; Veteran's Age. ( a ) If the last day of a time period specified in § 8.2 or § 8.3, or the last day allowed for filing an application for National Service Life Insurance or for applying for reinstatement thereof, or paying premiums due thereon, falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the time period will be extended to include the following workday.
( b ) For VALife, the premium will be determined using the age of the veteran at his or her nearest birthday on the effective date of the policy.
( c ) For purposes of determining a veteran's eligibility for VALife under 38 U.S.C. 1922B(a)(3)(A), the age of the veteran at his or her last birthday prior to the date of application will be used.
( d ) For purposes of determining a veteran's eligibility for VALife under 38 U.S.C. 1922B(a)(3)(B), with respect to a veteran who has attained 81 years of age, an initial grant of service connection for a new or secondary condition for which the veteran applied for disability compensation before attaining 81 years of age will satisfy the eligibility criteria; however, VA will not grant insurance to such a veteran based on an increase in an existing disability rating, a grant of individual unemployability under 38 CFR 4.18, or a finding of incompetency under 38 CFR 3.353. VA will not issue a VALife policy to a veteran over age 95.
[87 FR 73653, Dec. 1, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                           3,714
<SECURITIES>                                    35,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,161)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,400
<PP&E>                                          20,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,485
<SALES>                                         36,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,092
<CGS>                                           24,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (346)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (162)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (276)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>NET OF INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### BERRY V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 13, 1912.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas TV. Coleman, Jr.

Tate & Walker, for appellant, R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal abated by death of appellant.
#### § 1015.1 Scope of regulations in this part.

This part, known as Regulation O, is issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to implement the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act, Public Law 111-8, section 626, 123 Stat. 524 (Mar. 11, 2009), as clarified by the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, Public Law 111-24, section 511, 123 Stat. 1734 (May 22, 2009), and as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Public Law 111-203, section 1097, 124 Stat. 1376 (July 21, 2010). *This part applies to persons over which the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction under the Federal Trade Commission Act.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Earl Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Apollo Debt Solutions (the “registrant”);




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: March 30, 2022

|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Earl Hunt          
|    | Earl Hunt              
|    | Chief Executive Officer







---
#### Nelson, Trustee, *v.*State, ex rel. Martin et al.

[No. 20,778.

Filed May 28, 1907.]

1. *Schools.—Pupils.—Free*Conveyance.—Mandamus.—Prior to 1907, parents could not, by mandamus, compel township school trustees to furnish conveyance to' pupils, p. 492.

2. *Same.—Establishment.—Trustees.—Decisions.—Appeal from.*—Mandamus.—-Before parents can mandate a township trustee to establish a school, they must appeal, under §§6028, 6029 Burns 1901, §§4537, 4538 R. S. 1881, to the county superintendent. p. 492.

3. Same.—Pupils.-—Conveyance.-—-Statutes.—A right ' of transportation is given to certain pupils, by the act of 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 444). p. 492.

From White Circuit Court; *Charles W. Hanley,*Special Judge.

Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of Gus Martin and others, against John R. Nelson, as trustee of West Point School Township. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

*.Reversed.*

*' E. B. Sellers,*for appellant.

*George F. Palmer*and *Million & Hanna,*for appellee.

Gillett, J.

This was a proceeding by way of mandate against the trustee of West Point school township, in White county. The alternative writ commanded him to. furnish school facilities to relators’ children of school age. A demurrer to the writ was overruled, and an exception reserved. This ruling is assigned as error.

*492
      1. 2. It appears from the petition that the schoolhouse where relators’ children attended school during previous years was destroyed by fire and not rebuilt, and that for a number of years thereafter such children were furnished a conveyance by appellant in going to and from another school, but that this practice was after-wards discontinued. So far as appears from the petition (and as is affirmatively shown in the return), the school which such children formerly attended was legally abandoned. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the precise relief which relators seek-—whether it is to have their children transported to and from school, or to have a school established in the vicinity of their homes. We have but recently held that the trustee cannot, under the law as it existed when this action was brought, be compelled by mandate to furnish a conveyance. *State, ex rel.,*v. *Jackson*(1907), *ante,*384. If the establishment of a new school district is what is sought, it is enough to say that the matter complained of is of an administrative character, and, before resorting to the courts, relators should have sought a remedy, after the adverse decision of appellant, through the due course of appeal to the higher school authorities. §§6028, 6029 Burns 1901, §4537, 4538 R. S. 1881; *State, ex rel.,*v. *Seely*(1904), 163 Ind. 244; *Advisory Board, etc.,*v. *State, ex rel.*(1905), 164 Ind. 295; *State, ex rel.,*v. *Black*(1906), 166 Ind. 138.

3. We may add that under the act of March 11, 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 444), relators will doubtless find a sufficient remedy for their grievance.

Judgment reversed, with a direction to sustain the demurrer to the alternative writ.
#### § 59.121 Amendments to application.

Any amendment of an application that changes the scope of the application or changes the cost estimates by 10 percent or more shall be subject to approval in the same manner as an original application.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form CMC
Securities Corporation I's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               48
<BONDS>                                        426,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                        (58)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   426,612
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,754
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (19)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (19)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (19)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1013.5 Renegotiations, extensions, and assumptions. ( a ) *Renegotiation.* A renegotiation occurs when a consumer lease subject to this part is satisfied and replaced by a new lease undertaken by the same consumer. A renegotiation requires new disclosures, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Extension.* An extension is a continuation, agreed to by the lessor and the lessee, of an existing consumer lease beyond the originally scheduled end of the lease term, except when the continuation is the result of a renegotiation. An extension that exceeds six months requires new disclosures, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) *Assumption.* New disclosures are not required when a consumer lease is assumed by another person, whether or not the lessor charges an assumption fee.
( d ) *Exceptions.* New disclosures are not required for the following, even if they meet the definition of a renegotiation or an extension: ( 1 ) A reduction in the rent charge;
( 2 ) The deferment of one or more payments, whether or not a fee is charged;
( 3 ) The extension of a lease for not more than six months on a month-to-month basis or otherwise;
( 4 ) A substitution of leased property with property that has a substantially equivalent or greater economic value, provided no other lease terms are changed;
( 5 ) The addition, deletion, or substitution of leased property in a multiple-item lease, provided the average periodic payment does not change by more than 25 percent; or
( 6 ) An agreement resulting from a court proceeding.