alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00507-CV

In the Interest of Z. M., C. M. and A. G.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-06-003144, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Thomas Maldonado’s brief on appeal was originally due March 17, 2008.

On July 18, 2008, this Court ordered appellant’s counsel to file a brief on appellant’s behalf no later

than August 18. In response, counsel filed a motion stating that despite repeated attempts, he has

been unable to reach Maldonado since July 17, 2007. Counsel further represents that due to this lack

of communication, he has been unable to obtain Maldonado’s authorization to proceed with this

appeal. To date, no appellant’s brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. Accordingly,

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 17, 2008
# C_2016015EN.01000801.xml

| 16.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/8

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 February 2016

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(2016/C 15/03)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 418, 16.12.2015, p. 14.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.2.2016 | ... | 0,09 | 0,09 | 1,63 | 0,09 | 0,46 | 0,09 | 0,36 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 1,92 | 1,37 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 1,83 | 0,09 | 1,65 | - 0,22 | 0,09 | 0,09 | 1,04 |
| 1.1.2016 | 31.1.2016 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,63 | 0,12 | 0,46 | 0,12 | 0,36 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,92 | 1,37 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,83 | 0,12 | 1,65 | - 0,22 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,04 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.2.2016

...

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

1,63

0,09

0,09

0,46

0,09

0,09

0,36

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

1,92

1,37

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

1,83

0,09

0,09

1,65

- 0,22

0,09

0,09

0,09

0,09

1,04

1.1.2016

31.1.2016

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,63

1,63

0,12

0,12

0,46

0,46

0,12

0,12

0,36

0,36

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,92

1,92

1,37

1,37

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,83

1,83

0,12

0,12

1,65

1,65

- 0,22

0,22

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,04

1,04

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Genova Biotherapeutics Inc. (“Genova”).

Genova is incorporated under the laws of Nevada and has its primary headquarters in New York, New York. Questions have arisen regarding stock promotional activity for Genova and the adequacy and accuracy of press releases, financial statements, and statements on the company's Web site concerning the company's current financial condition, business and operations, and stock promoting activity.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in Genova's securities.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, on September 23, 2009 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on October 6, 2009.                

By the Commission.

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-23297 Filed 9-23-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Research Frontiers
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Saxe,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert L. Saxe
    Robert L. Saxe
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    November 6, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47951-47952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22254]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-36]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use To assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: September 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.


[[Page 47952]]


    Dated: September 10, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9-22254 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.951 Preservation of disability ratings. ( a ) A readjustment to the Schedule for Rating Disabilities shall not be grounds for reduction of a disability rating in effect on the date of the readjustment unless medical evidence establishes that the disability to be evaluated has actually improved. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)
( b ) A disability which has been continuously rated at or above any evaluation of disability for 20 or more years for compensation purposes under laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs will not be reduced to less than such evaluation except upon a showing that such rating was based on fraud. Likewise, a rating of permanent total disability for pension purposes which has been in force for 20 or more years will not be reduced except upon a showing that the rating was based on fraud. The 20-year period will be computed from the effective date of the evaluation to the effective date of reduction of evaluation.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 110)
[34 FR 11970, July 16, 1969, as amended at 57 FR 10426, Mar. 26, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   894
<PP&E>                                          12,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,687,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,232
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2408 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Milo C. 

Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2408 EH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 OUTPATIENT CLINIC, GREEN BAY, WIS3 CONSIN. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic 

5 in Green Bay, Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Milo 

7 C. Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

8 Clinic’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 

9 regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

10 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

11 Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Out12 patient Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2408 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs 

fairs Outpatient Clinic’’. ‘‘Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans Afoutpatient clinic in Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the
​

**Exhibit 35.2**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 31, 2022 through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 10, 2021 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2021 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| 2024                  | ​                     | ​                                    |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​               | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​               | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

​

----
§ 8.28 Expedited procedures for review of immediate suspension. ( a ) *Applicability.* When the Secretary notifies an OTP in writing that its certification has been immediately suspended, the appellant may request an expedited review of the suspension and any proposed revocation. The appellant must submit this request in writing to the reviewing official within 10 days of the date the OTP received notice of the suspension. The request for review must include a copy of the suspension and any proposed revocation, a brief statement of why the decision to suspend and propose revocation is incorrect, and the appellant's request for an oral presentation, if desired. A copy of the request for review must also be sent to the respondent.
( b ) *Reviewing official's response.* As soon as practicable after the request for review is received, the reviewing official will send an acknowledgment with a copy to the respondent.
( c ) *Review file and briefs.* Within 10 days of the date the request for review is received, but no later than 2 days before an oral presentation, each party shall submit to the reviewing official the following: ( 1 ) A review file containing essential documents relevant to the review, tabbed, indexed, and organized chronologically; and
( 2 ) A written statement, not to exceed 20 double-spaced pages, explaining the party's position concerning the suspension and any proposed revocation. No reply brief is permitted.
( d ) *Oral presentation.* If an oral presentation is requested by the appellant or otherwise granted by the reviewing official in accordance with § 8.27(a), the presiding official will attempt to schedule the oral presentation within 20 to 30 days of the date of appellant's request for review at a time and place determined by the presiding official following consultation with the parties. The presiding official may hold a pre-hearing conference in accordance with § 8.27(c) and will conduct the oral presentation in accordance with the procedures of § 8.27(e), (f), and (g).
( e ) *Written decision.* The reviewing official shall issue a written decision upholding or denying the suspension or proposed revocation and will attempt to issue the decision within 7 to 10 days of the date of the oral presentation or within 3 days of the date on which the transcript is received or the date of the last submission by either party, whichever is later. All other provisions set forth in § 8.33 apply.
( f ) *Transmission of written communications.* Because of the importance of timeliness for the expedited procedures in this section, all written communications between the parties and between either party and the reviewing official shall be sent by facsimile transmission, personal service, or commercial overnight delivery service.
#### § 23.455 Textbooks and curricular material.

Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted as requiring or prohibiting or abridging in any way the use of particular textbooks or curricular materials.
## EXHIBIT 32.2

## Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by FCCC, Inc. (the
Registrant), I, Martin Cohen, Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 
| | 

| | Name: Martin Cohen                                                                                                                           
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Title: Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal
                                                                      Financial Officer

Dated: November 7, 2005

---
#### THE UNITED STATES v. NOCE

June 8, 1925.

[58 C. Cls. 688; 268 U. S. 613]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *reversed,*the Supreme Court deciding:

1. An Army officer *held*not entitled to count for longevity pay Ms service as a cadet in the Military Academy.

2. The proviso in section 13 of the act of May 18, 1920, 41 Stat. 601,. “ that hereafter longevity pay for officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Public Health Service and Coast and Geodetic Survey shall be based on the total of all service in any or all of said services,” does not deal with rules of longevity in any one service but intends to produce equality as between all the services named and did not repeal the provisions in the Army and Naval Appropriation acts of October 24, 1912, and March ■ 4 1913, respectively, directing that service in the Military and Naval Academies shall not be counted in computing for any purpose the length of service of an officer of the Army, Navy, or Marine Corps.

Mr. Chief Justioe Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                     1,975,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,270,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 300,000
<INVENTORY>                                5,163,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,468,000
<PP&E>                                    18,529,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            11,707,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            18,823,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,400,000
<BONDS>                                           00
<COMMON>                                     466,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                11,154,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              18,823,000
<SALES>                                   35,934,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          35,934,000
<CGS>                                     31,615,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             31,615,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           919,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6,295,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (6,295,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.41)
        


</TABLE>
exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Wilhelm
Michael Wilhelm
Chief Executive Officer
December 23, 2003


/s/ Eric Hopkins
Eric Hopkins
Chief Financial Officer
December 23, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.