alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 39.60 General requirements for site selection and construction of veterans cemeteries. ( a ) The various codes, requirements, and recommendations of State or Tribal Organization and local authorities or technical and professional organizations, to the extent and manner in which those codes, requirements, and recommendations are referenced in this subpart, are applicable to grants involving construction of veterans cemeteries. Additional information concerning these codes, requirements, and recommendations may be obtained from VA, National Cemetery Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.
( b ) The standards in §§ 39.60, 39.61, 39.62, and 39.63 constitute general design and construction criteria and shall apply to all Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Projects for which Federal assistance is requested under 38 U.S.C. 2408.
( c ) In developing these standards, no attempt has been made to comply with all of the various State and local codes and regulations. The standards contained in §§ 39.60, 39.61, 39.62, and 39.63 shall be followed where they exceed State or local codes and regulations. Departure will be permitted, however, when alternate standards are demonstrated to provide equivalent or better design criteria than the standards in these sections. Conversely, compliance is required with State and local codes where such requirements provide a standard higher than those in these sections. The additional cost, if any, in using standards that are higher than those of VA should be documented and justified in the application.
( d ) The space criteria and area requirements referred to in these standards shall be used as a guide in planning. Additional area and facilities beyond those specified as basic may be included if found to be necessary to meet the functional requirements of the project but are subject to approval by VA. Substantial deviation from the space criteria or area standards shall be carefully considered and justified. Failing to meet the criteria or standards or exceeding them by more than 10 percent in the completed plan would be regarded as evidence of inferior design or as exceeding the boundaries of professional requirements. In those projects that unjustifiably exceed maximum space criteria or area requirements, VA funding may be subject to reduction in proportion to the amount by which the space or area of the cemetery exceeds the maximum specified in these standards.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4476, Jan. 30, 2012]
§ 6.18 Other disabilities deemed to be total and permanent. ( a ) In addition to the conditions specified in 38 U.S.C. 1958, the following also will be deemed to be total and permanent disabilities: Organic loss of speech; permanently helpless or permanently bedridden.
( b ) Organic loss of speech will mean the loss of the ability to express oneself, both by voice and whisper, through the normal organs of speech if such loss is caused by organic changes in such organs. Where such loss exists, the fact that some speech can be produced through the use of an artificial appliance or other organs of the body will be disregarded.
[61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Brian Carter, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dirt Motor Sports, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.        Date: August 15, 2005 /s/ Brian Carter   Brian Carter,   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. Paul Broyer, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 13, 2003 |                     | /s/ F. Paul  Broyer |   |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |         | F. Paul  Broyer          |
|   |         | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CandelaCorporation and will be retained by Candela Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# Official Journal C 195A/7 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 195A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 617 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 195A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 617 June 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 195 A/01 | Directorate-General for Budget (DG BUDG) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), Brussels (Article 29 § 2 of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10380 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2018/C 195 A/01

Directorate-General for Budget (DG BUDG) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), Brussels (Article 29 § 2 of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10380

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 198/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 198 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 198

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 198/01 | Position (EU) No 19/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘Fiscalis’ programme for cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013Adopted by the Council on 10 May 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 198/02 | Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 19/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘Fiscalis’ programme for cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013 | 18 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 198/01

Position (EU) No 19/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘Fiscalis’ programme for cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013Adopted by the Council on 10 May 2021

1

2021/C 198/02

Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 19/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘Fiscalis’ programme for cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 21.96 Review of the plan. ( a ) *General.* The veteran's progress in reaching the goals of the plan will be reviewed and evaluated as scheduled in the plan by the case manager and the veteran.
( b ) *Comprehensive review required.* The case manager and the veteran will review all of the terms of the plan and the veteran's progress at least every twelve months. On the basis of such review the veteran and the case manager will agree whether the plan should be: ( 1 ) Retained in its current form;
( 2 ) Amended; or
( 3 ) Redeveloped.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107(b))
#### BIRMINGHAM RY. L. & P. CO. V. PINSON.

(Decided April 11, 1912.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. Charles W. Ferguson.

Tillman, Bradley & Morrow, for appellant. Harsh, Beddow & Fitts, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed by agreement.
EXHIBIT 32.1


            CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly
Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the Company)  on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Saxe, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.


/s/  Robert L. Saxe
     Robert L. Saxe
     Chairman and Chief
     Executive Officer
     October 28, 2004
# Official Journal C 337A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.337.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 337A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5314 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.337.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 337A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5314 December 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 337A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 29th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 337A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 29th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 101.8 Evasion.

The OCC may disapprove any notice submitted pursuant to this part if the OCC determines that the notice is made for the purpose of evading § 101.5, including as that section applies to a covered savings association terminating an election.
#### A. Palmer Dudley, Respondent, *v.*Henry Campbell, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment upon a verdict and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*800John H. Bogan, for appellant.

Julius Offenbach, for respondent.

0 oylay, J.

The action was to recover for services of the plaintiff as a physician and surgeon, performed, as it is alleged, at the request of the defendant. The answer denies the contract and the evidence on both sides is conflicting.

In the charge to the jury the court, among other things, said: “ Now, it is purely a question of fact; you are the sole judges of the fact; the simple question is whether this contract has been made or whether it has not been made. If you come to the conclusion from all the evidence that the contract has been made, as Dr. Dudley testified, then, of course, the plaintiff would be entitled to a verdict.”

Upon this submission of the controversy the jury determined the facts in favor of the plaintiff, and we have no disposition to interfere with the conclusions thus reached. There was no exception to any portion of the charge; the question was purely one of fact and was peculiarly for the jury to pass upon.

For the reasons stated, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimoys, Oh. J., and O’Dwyeb, J., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul J. Malvasio, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Paul J.  Malvasio                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul J.  Malvasio                                      |
| Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| August 5,  2004                                        |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The Navigators Group, Inc. and will be retained by The NavigatorsGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
#### § 53.32 Recapture provisions.

If a State fails to use the funds provided under this part for the purpose for which payment was made or receives more than is allowed under this part, the United States shall be entitled to recover from the State the amount not used for such purpose or the excess amount received.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1744)
Matrice 100- Aircraft Status Indicator Description 

FIOmDHWiki 

Normal 

@ ...... Flashing Red, Green and Yellow Alternatively Power on and self-check 

:tf;$j:i$'): ...... Flashing Green and Yellow Alternatively 

@; .. · .. · Flashing Green Slowly ... 

$-...... flashing Yellow Slowly .,. 

Warning 

:tJf: ...... Flashing Yellow Rapidly 

...... Flashing Red Slowly 

:f/!f. ...... Flashing Red Rapidly 

® · · · · · · Flashing Red Alternatively 

:®.· - Solid Red 

:f/!1.- '¢J ...... Flashing Red and Yellow Alternatively 

Retriewd from "hhlp:llwiki.clji.com/eu/indelr.php?titlFMafrice_l()().. 

_AircJ8t\_Stalui_Indicator_Deecription&old.id--23291" 

• This pap wu last modified on 21 July 2015, at 05:37. 

• This page hu been IIC<lOIIIed 1991imes. 

Aircraft warming up 

Safe to Fly (P-Mode with GPS) 

Safe to Fly (No GPS) 

Remote controller signal Lost 

Low battery warning 

Critically low battery warning 

IMU error 

Critical error 

Compass calibration required 

1/1
Draft Proposal CB-42 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Mechanical Commissioning Order of Events (CB-42) 

Objective:  Clarify the order in which commissioning events take place.

Revise Section C408.2 as follows:

C406.2 Mechanical systems commissioning and completion requirements. Prior to passing the final 

mechanical inspection, the registered design professional shall provide evidence of mechanical systems 

commissioning and completion in accordance with this section. 

(Remainder of the section remains unchanged.)

Reason:  Clarification.  The current code requires something to be done in advance of a future event.  

The registered design professional can only provide something either prior to an inspection or after

passage of the inspection.  

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024

RIN 1991-AB77


Assistance Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is correcting a final rule that 
appeared in the Federal Register of August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44273). In 
this document, DOE amended its Financial Assistance Regulations to 
update, streamline, and simplify the general rules, and also removed 
regulations governing the DOE Financial Assistance Appeals Board.

DATES: This correction is effective September 28, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of 
Procurement and Assistance Policy, U.S. Department of Energy, at 202-
287-1342, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e9e2e0f2f6e6efeaede6ade8edeaf0e8e6f1edc3ebf2ade7ece6ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f29893918387979e9b9c97dc999c9b819997809cb29a83dc969d97dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E9-20299, appearing on page 44273 
in the Federal Register of Friday, August 28, 2009, the following 
correction is made:


Sec.  600.6  [Corrected]

    On page 44275, third column, Sec.  600.6, introductory paragraph 
(c), the phrase ``DOE may award a grant or cooperative agreement on a 
noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of 
the follow selection criteria:'' is corrected to read ``DOE may award a 
grant or cooperative agreement or technology investment agreement on a 
noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of 
the follow selection criteria:''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 21, 2009.
Edward R. Simpson,
Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, Office of 
Management, Department of Energy.
Joe Waddell,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, National 
Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-23188 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 10.37


 


AMENDMENT


 


                THIS
AGREEMENT made effective as of October 8, 2003, between Anika Therapeutics,
Inc. (“ANIKA”) and MedChem Products, Inc. (“MEDCHEM”).


 


                WHEREAS,
ANIKA and MEDCHEM are parties to that Sublease effective November 1, 2001 (the
“SUBLEASE”);


 


                WHEREAS,
ANIKA and MEDCHEM are desirous of amending the SUBLEASE;


 


                NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the parties agree to amend
the SUBLEASE as follows:


 


1.                          Section 1 is
deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 


 


            “1. Sublandlord hereby leases to
Subtenant, and Subtenant hereby takes and leases from Sublandlord, the
Subleased Premises for an initial term which commences on November 1, 2001 (the
“Commencement Date”) and ends on October 31, 2004.  After the expiration of the initial term, this Sublease shall
thereafter remain in effect until terminated by one party upon at least ninety
(90) days prior written notice to the other party.  The Subleased Premises are to be delivered to Subtenant in their
“as is” condition and the Subleased Premises shall be treated as delivered on
the Commencement Date.”


 


2.                          In all other
respects, the SUBLEASE shall remain in full force and effect.


 


                IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives
to execute this Amendment.


 


 


	
  Anika Therapeutics, Inc.

  	
   

  	
  MedChem Products, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ William J. Knight

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Brian P. Kelly

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Brian P. Kelly

  
	
  Title:

  	
  CFO

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Vice President