alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 53.20 Application requirements. ( a ) To apply for payments during a Federal fiscal year, a State representative must submit to VA, in accordance with § 53.40, a completed VA Form 10-0430 and documentation specified by the form (VA Form 10-0430 is available at VA medical centers and on the Internet at *http://www1.va.gov/geriatricsshg/* or may be obtained by contacting the Geriatrics and Extended Care Office at 202-461-6750, VHA Headquarters, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420). The submission for payments for a fiscal year must be received by VA during the last quarter (July 1-September 30) of the preceding fiscal year. The State must submit a new application for each fiscal year that the State seeks payments for an incentive program.
( b ) As part of the application, the State representative must submit to VA evidence that the State has sufficient funding, when combined with the VA payments, to fully operate its employee incentive program through the end of the fiscal year. To meet this requirement, the State representative must provide to VA a letter from an authorized State official certifying that, if VA were to approve payments under this part, the non-VA share of the funds for the program would be by a date or dates specified in the certification, available for the employee incentive program without further State action to make such funds available. If the certification is based on a State law authorizing funds for the employee incentive program, a copy of the State law must be submitted with the certification.
( c ) If an application does not contain sufficient information for a determination under this part, the State representative will be notified in writing (electronically and by mail) of any additional submission required and that the State has 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to submit such additional information or no further action will be taken. If the State representative does not submit all of the required information or demonstrate that he or she has good cause for failing to provide the information within 30 calendar days of the notice (which may extend beyond the last quarter of the preceding Federal fiscal year), then the State applicant will be notified in writing that the application for VA assistance will be deemed withdrawn and no further action will be taken.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection provisions in this section under control number 2900-0709) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1744)
[73 FR 73560, Dec. 3, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 73313, Dec. 10, 2012]
OFFiCE 0,F THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

umc.DmNm 

rommmv~ 



w nho aaL ssur attsiltiou to the OQW at aeoebp 

c3uaty c%t%lo co< ‘I* Eo5eraott, ml 9. a* ms* In ?a%%* an* auft wae broughe bar the SA% Collector Pox! th% mu of #3do,oo 

bawd on a oontraat TnrPIi%h ix had eatered into w;lth an lndivldual fdr the prepamtabisn of a tar oertlXi%ats w&&oh was to 

03AkiR llot only the information required that th8 aolloobor 

Sumlrh War Arttolo 73%. supra, but e&e% ,the sfme wa8 t% 

be lnmmd &cwia~ that the &exam wema pal& and by whom pnid. 

The wurt held tbab t&e, tar ool%soDor would &et be bntitlsd 

to reciover for the furnbhlng or fi ctwtifioete euah %B pmvlded in ;*rtiale 7SiZd beoauso the 6wr& was rsithin the 800&w 

of his dutl*s. EScmovst, the oour$ hold that the tax oolleetor 

am14 reawer w.al* the aoatraot in qwution bwfmea the certifloat in qtsetlon mv$ulraU a4d.ltlo~ lnioruw~tlon abavo that 

whioh it is the ttu~ collector’s duty to furniah,umder eaid arctAOlO. The ootlrt abated as ro~fows: 
- 
Lag. 

1. 880 - : 

ATTORNEY GENEFXL OF Tms
#iregg Sharper 

.•-••rDApTfjICMT HP 

m af tijt muitth BtaM imwm m 

mm mmitu Mi^^is^im . '•'^'^^OPERAIIONS 

307 Cnimon J^oiifif ©{(icf jSinlDing ° Sllnsliiiiston, QC 2051S <> 202-2^^^^^ A in- ^'^ 

coMMtrTEES; HOU5SAnvl^^5^^ATlON,DuooE^,JuDKlARY.A^^)JOl^nco^i^1fnEeo^JTHi=l.lanARyo^cotA3Klis'-'-'' ' . * ^ 

SUBCnMt/.rrrtnS: ELECTI0.".'S (HOU-JO AUmlnisnation) 

COURTS & COMPmnO M POUCV Uiid.cisryl and IMMIGRATION CITIZENSHIP. R=a;GEnS, nORDER SllCUmr v & INTERNATIONAL LAW IJiidiLiaivl 

August 25,2010 

Honorable Raymond LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 i 

Dear Secretary LaHood: | 

t 

I am writing in support of the Small Community Air Service Grant application being submitted 

by the Jackson Municipal Airport Authority. ' 

The Jackson Municipal Airport, located in Jackson, Mississippi, provides essential air service for 

government officials, regional businesses, and educational institutions in the Jackson area and 

across the state. The Authority will use this fimding for marketing purposes and to better inform 

the local community of the services offered by the airport and the airlines that currently provide 

service to the region. Affordable access to air travel is a very powerfial tool for economic 

development and also ensures small businesses and the general public in Mississippi have access 

to multiple markets to maximize their earning potential. j 

I 

I offer my support for the Small Community Air Service Grant application submitted by the 

Jackson Municipal Airport Authority. The Authority works extremely hard to market the airport 

services and meet the needs of the community, and I hope you wil 

strong consideration. Again, thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

give their proposal your 

Gregg 

Member of ( igress 

DISTRICT OFFICES 

PtABL 

?507 A Oi o BnAt.'BOH ROA U 

P I Aiu. M S 392Dfl 

MERIDIA N 

823 WK O AvFr-iJE 

t>tfRiriiiN, M S 39301 

001.C33.B681 

STARKVILLE 

1 R.'Sf ARCH BouLr^nnn , SunE 206 

STAnKviiu . M S 39759 

662324000 7 

BnooktiAvtrj 

230 SOUT H WHrrwoHi n SmECT 

BnocKiiAVEN. M S 33S01 

601.0233400 

fRIti rVO ON RECVClCn PA«H
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22990]



[[Page 48601]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1501]


NIJ Metal Detector Standards Workshop

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is hosting a Metal 
Detector Standards Workshop for manufacturers on Tuesday, October 6, 
2009. The meeting will be held from 2:30 to 4 p.m. at the Hyatt Regency 
Denver Tech Center, 7800 East Tufts Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80237. NIJ 
is hosting this workshop specifically to introduce manufacturers to the 
revised NIJ Walk-through Metal Detector Standard and the revised NIJ 
Handheld Metal Detector Standard that are under development and to 
receive feedback. Participants are strongly encouraged to come prepared 
to ask questions and to voice suggestions and concerns.
    Space is limited at this workshop, and as a result, only 50 
participants will be allowed to register. We request that each 
manufacturer limit their representatives to no more than two per 
organization. Exceptions to this limit may occur, should space allow. 
Participants planning to attend are responsible for their own travel 
arrangements. Please send your registration request to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d3e392c23292c3f293e0d2321282e392e60712c6d253f282b70" http: rm.org">rm.org</a>">standards@nlectc-rm.org</a> and indicate in the email that the workshop you 
are requesting to attend is the Metal Detector Standards Workshop. You 
will receive a response to your request within 2 business days.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 2:30 to 4 p.m. on Tuesday, October 
6, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Hyatt Regency Denver Tech Center, 7800 East Tufts Avenue, 
Denver, Colorado 80237.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Castellanos, by telephone at 
202-514-5272 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bccaddd2d9cfcfdd92dfddcfc8d9d0d0ddd2d3cffcd3d6cc92c9cfd8d3d692dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1462757a716767753a77756760717878757a7b67547b7e643a6167707b7e3a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
Kristina Rose,
Acting Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. E9-22990 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.460 Death pension. Death pension will be apportioned if the child or children of the deceased veteran are not in the custody of the surviving spouse. Where the surviving spouse's rate is in excess of $70 monthly because of having been the spouse of the veteran during service or because of need for regular aid and attendance, the additional amount will be added to the surviving spouse's share. ( a ) *Civil, Indian and Spanish-American wars.* Where pension is payable under 38 U.S.C. 1532, 1534, or 1536 apportionment will be based on the facts in the individual case in accordance with § 3.451.
( b ) *Section 306 and old-law death pension.* Appointment of benefits provided under these pension programs will be at rates approved by the Under Secretary for Benefits except when the facts and circumstances in a case warrant special apportionment under § 3.451. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307)
( c ) *Improved death pension.* Apportionment of the benefits provided under this program shall be made under the special apportionment provision of § 3.451.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307)
[41 FR 21324, May 25, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 14018, Apr. 4, 1978; 44 FR 45940, Aug. 6, 1979; 61 FR 20727, May 8, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.306 Aggravation of preservice disability. ( a ) *General.* A preexisting injury or disease will be considered to have been aggravated by active military, naval, air, or space service, where there is an increase in disability during such service, unless there is a specific finding that the increase in disability is due to the natural progress of the disease. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1153)
( b ) *Wartime service; peacetime service after December 31, 1946.* Clear and unmistakable evidence (obvious or manifest) is required to rebut the presumption of aggravation where the preservice disability underwent an increase in severity during service. This includes medical facts and principles which may be considered to determine whether the increase is due to the natural progress of the condition. Aggravation may not be conceded where the disability underwent no increase in severity during service on the basis of all the evidence of record pertaining to the manifestations of the disability prior to, during and subsequent to service. ( 1 ) The usual effects of medical and surgical treatment in service, having the effect of ameliorating disease or other conditions incurred before enlistment, including postoperative scars, absent or poorly functioning parts or organs, will not be considered service connected unless the disease or injury is otherwise aggravated by service.
( 2 ) Due regard will be given the places, types, and circumstances of service and particular consideration will be accorded combat duty and other hardships of service. The development of symptomatic manifestations of a preexisting disease or injury during or proximately following action with the enemy or following a status as a prisoner of war will establish aggravation of a disability. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1154)
( c ) *Peacetime service prior to December 7, 1941.* The specific finding requirement that an increase in disability is due to the natural progress of the condition will be met when the available evidence of a nature generally acceptable as competent shows that the increase in severity of a disease or injury or acceleration in progress was that normally to be expected by reason of the inherent character of the condition, aside from any extraneous or contributing cause or influence peculiar to military service. Consideration will be given to the circumstances, conditions, and hardships of service.
[26 FR 1580, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 57 FR 59296, Dec. 15, 1992; 87 FR 26125, May 3, 2022]
#### Helene M. Canavello, Respondent, *v.*Michael & Company, a Corporation Impleaded, Etc., Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

April, 1900.)

Corporation — A guaranty toy is not within Code C. F., § 1778 — Default.

*Semble,*that an action against a corporation upon a guaranty is not within the scope of section 1778 of the Code of Civil Procedure, declaring that, in actions covered toy that section, unless the corporation serves with its answer or demurrer a copy of a judge’s order directing that the issues toe tried, the plaintiff may take judgment as in case of a default in pleading.

Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment, entered upon failure to serve answer, it being alleged that a copy of answer had been received but was not served in time.

Wertheimer *&*Duffy (Louis Wertheimer, of counsel), for appellant.

Erank H. Gray, for respondent.

Has call, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover upon an alleged agreement by defendant to pay rent, because it had occupied premises, in connection with its codefendant, for two months.

There was no lease but an alleged written obligation, which seems to be treated by all the parties as a guaranty, and which respondent claims is a promise to pay. The case is at once taken out from under section 1778 by good authority (88 N. Y. 424), and as it was thus not necessary to serve with the answer an order that the issues be tried, now, to sustain the order, there must be some other reason than that advanced by the respondent. . Such other reason is that motion costs had not been paid. But the order therefor was only served two days prior to the service of answer, and did not contain, so far as the appeal-book shows, any time limit within which payment was to be made; hence, ten days (§ 779) is the time fixed, of which only two days had expired. The papers also show that the answer had not been returned when judgment was *171entered. This may be held a waiver of objection, and made the entry of judgment an impropriety at that time, now to be relieved against.

Order appealed from reversed and motion granted, with costs and disbursements to be offset against costs of motion accrued below.

O’Dwyer, L, concurs.

Order reversed and motion granted, with costs to be offset against costs of motion.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U. S.
      C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert S. Kendall, Chairman and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Robert S. Kendall





Robert
      S.
      Kendall


Chairman
      and Treasurer


October
      15, 2007




17
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-610 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TELECOMMUNICATION 

Conformity Assessment of Equipment 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Paris May 26, 2011 

with 

Appendices 

and 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MEXICO 

Telecommunication: Conformity Assessment of 

 Equipment 

 Agreement signed at Paris May 26, 2011; 

 Entered into force June 10, 2011. 

 With appendices and annexes. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Spanish text of this Agreement. If the Spanish text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                        97
<INVENTORY>                                      1,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,538
<PP&E>                                           7,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,969
<BONDS>                                          3,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,127
<SALES>                                          7,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,223
<CGS>                                            4,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 84I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 084I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6320 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 084I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6320 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/426 of 19 March 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/426 of 19 March 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### HUDGINS V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 28, 1912.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Coleman, Jr.

No counsel marked for appellant, R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and. W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Walker, P. J. —

No hill of exceptions and no error in the record. Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 89/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.089.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 89 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 521 April 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.089.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 89

English edition

Legislation

Volume 521 April 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 263/2009 of 31 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 264/2009 of 31 March 2009 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 April 2009 | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 265/2009 of 31 March 2009 amending for the 105th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban | 6 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 263/2009 of 31 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 264/2009 of 31 March 2009 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 April 2009

3

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 265/2009 of 31 March 2009 amending for the 105th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.