alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF 3/31/00 AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOW FOR THE PERIOD
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            (75)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                       141
<INVENTORY>                                      1,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,478
<PP&E>                                           9,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,928
<BONDS>                                          3,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,792
<SALES>                                          2,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,537
<CGS>                                            2,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. 552b]; Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Tuesday, October 6, 2009.

PLACE:  5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of Minutes of July 16, 2009 Quarterly Business Meeting.
    2. Approval of Final Rule on Applying the 1987 DC Board of Parole 
Guidelines to Sellmon cases.
    3. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and 
Section Administrators.

AGENCY CONTACT:  Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission. (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Rockne J. Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-23593 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CKX, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Benson, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 9,2007

|        |   | By:    |     | /s/ THOMAS P.  BENSON                                    |
|--------|--------|--------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |     | Thomas P. Benson                                         |
|   |   |   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President  and* |
|   |   |   | * * | *Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*                |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 30, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0017. IN RE: KEVIN GOUGH.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
October 6, 2014

Docket FAA-2000-8180

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Extension of Exemption 5560, as amended

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Regional Airline Association (“RAA”), on behalf of its Part 135 member airlines,1 petitions 

pursuant to Sections 11.61 and 11.63 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) for an extension of 

Exemption 5560I, which is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2014. 

Exemption 5560I provides relief from 14 CFR §§ 61.3(a) and (c), 63.3(a), and 135.95(a). It 

permits the establishment of special procedures that enable an operator to issue to its flight 

crewmembers, on a temporary basis, confirmation of any required crewmember certificates based upon 

information contained in the operator's approved record system subject to certain conditions and 

limitations. Exemption 5560 has proved to be a useful device that benefits the commercial aviation 

industry and the flying public

Extending this exemption will not compromise or adversely affect safety, as the conditions and 

circumstances pertaining to safety and public interest, which warranted the grant of the original request 

and subsequent extensions, continue to exist. The approved procedures, encompassing the conditions 

and limitations established by previous grants, have been in use for over a decade with no known 

compromise of safety. It is also in the public interest as the exemption can prevent possible and 

unnecessary delays or cancellations of scheduled air service. For these reasons, Exemption 5560I 

should be extended.

1 AirNet Systems, Cape Air, Era Aviation, Grand Canyon Airlines/Scenic, Great Lakes Aviation, New England Airlines

1 of 3

 
In accordance with FAR 11.87, RAA requests that the requirement for publication and comment 

be waived. The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue and this petition does not seek to 

establish a precedent, rather would merely continue an accepted and established practice. Although 

RAA requests waiver of publication, a summary of this petition is attached as required by FAR 11.81.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or require additional 

information. 

Respectfully submitted,

Stacey Bechdolt

Sr. Director, Safety & Technical Affairs

Regulatory Counsel

Regional Airline Association

2025 M Street, NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

202-367-1252

Bechdolt@raa.org

2 of 3
SUMMARY

Petitioner: Regional Airline Association.

Sections of 14 CFR Affected:

14 CFR 61.3(a)

14 CFR 61.3(c)

14 CFR 135.95(a)

Description of Relief Sought:

The Regional Airline Association petitions on behalf of its member airlines for an extension of 

Exemption 5560I. This exemption permits RAA Part 135 member airlines to establish special 

procedures that enable an air carrier to issue to its flight crewmembers, on a temporary basis, 

confirmation of any required crewmember certificate based on information contained in the carrier’s 

approved record system.

3 of 3
§ 21.346 Facility temporarily not offering training or rehabilitation services. ( a ) *Approval of leave of absence not required.* A veteran may receive subsistence allowance, during a period when the facility temporarily is not offering services, without the veteran's being charged with leave when: ( 1 ) The facility is closed temporarily under an executive order of the President or due to an emergency situation;
( 2 ) The veteran is pursuing on-job training and he or she receives holidays established by Federal or State law;
( 3 ) The veteran is pursuing farm cooperative training and is required in the ordinary day to day conduct of farm business to be absent: ( i ) From the farm; or
( ii ) From that part of a farm cooperative course which is given at the educational institution.
( 4 ) The veteran is pursuing a standard college degree; and ( i ) There is an interval between consecutive semesters, terms, quarters or periods of instruction *within a certified enrollment period* which does not exceed a full calendar month;
( ii ) There is an interval, which does not exceed a full calendar month between semesters, terms or quarters when the educational institution only certifies enrollment on a semester, term, or quarter basis; or
( iii ) There is an interval, which does not exceed 30 days, when the veteran, as part of his or her approved program of vocational rehabilitation, transfers from one educational institution to another for the purpose of enrolling in and pursuing a similar program at the second institution;
( 5 ) The veteran is pursuing a non-college-degree course and there is a period of up to 5 days per twelve-month period during which the school offering non-college-degree courses is not operating, because instructors are attending professional meetings.
( b ) *Case manager responsibility.* The case manager may disapprove leave under paragraph (a)(4) of this section if: ( 1 ) Approval would result in or lead to use of more than 48 months of entitlement under Chapter 31, alone; or
( 2 ) Approval would require extension of the scheduled completion date of the veteran's program.
( c ) *Approval of leaves of absence required.* A veteran, who wishes to receive subsistence allowance while the facility temporarily is not offering training under conditions other than those identified in paragraph (a) of this section, must seek an approved leave of absence and be charged leave.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3110)
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.803 Naval pension. ( a ) Payment of naval pension will be authorized on the basis of a certification by the Secretary of the Navy. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 6160)
( b ) Awards of naval pension in effect prior to July 14, 1943, or renewed or continued may be paid concurrently with Department of Veterans Affairs pension or compensation; however, naval pension allowance under 10 U.S.C. 6160 may not exceed one-fourth of the rate of disability pension or compensation otherwise payable, exclusive of additional allowances for dependents or specific disabilities.
( c ) New awards of naval pension may not be made concurrently with Department of Veterans Affairs pension or compensation. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5304(a))
( d ) Naval pension remaining unpaid at the date of the veteran's death is not payable by the Department of Veterans Affairs as an accrued benefit.
[26 FR 1605, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 28 FR 2857, Mar. 22, 1963; 44 FR 22721, Apr. 17, 1979]
§ 48.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.
EX-4.i



 THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN ENDORSEMENT 

This Endorsement forms a part of the Contract to which it is attached. The effective date of this Endorsement is the Contract Date shown on
the Contract Data Page. 
 THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS APPLY TO A CONTRACT WHICH IS ISSUED UNDER A PLAN QUALIFIED UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
(“IRC”) SECTION 401. IN THE CASE OF A CONFLICT WITH ANY PROVISION IN THE CONTRACT, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT WILL CONTROL. 
  

	1)	 The Annuitant of this Contract will be the applicable Owner under the Plan and the Owner of this Contract will be as designated in the Plan.



  

	2)	 This Contract, and the benefits under it, cannot be sold, assigned, discounted, pledged as collateral for a loan or as security for the performance
of an obligation or for any other purpose to any person other than the Company. 


  

	3)	 The terms of this Contract and Endorsement are subject to the provisions of the plan under which this Contract and Endorsement are issued.



  

	4)	 The MISSTATEMENT OF AGE OR SEX section of the Contract is deleted and replaced by the following section entitled “MISSTATEMENT OF AGE”.



 MISSTATEMENT OF AGE 

If the Age of any Annuitant has been misstated, future annuity payments will be adjusted using the correct Age according to Our
rates in effect on the date that annuity payments were determined. Any overpayment from the 1-Year Fixed Account Option, plus interest at the rate of 4% per year, will be deducted from the next payment(s) due. Any underpayment from the 1-Year
Fixed Account Option, plus interest at the rate of 4% per year, will be paid in full with the next payment due. Any overpayment from the Subaccounts will be deducted from the next payment(s) due. Any underpayment from the Subaccounts will be
paid in full with the next payment due. 
  

	5)	 The PROOF OF AGE, SEX OR SURVIVAL section of the Contract is deleted and replaced by the following section entitled “PROOF OF AGE AND
SURVIVAL”. 


 PROOF OF AGE AND SURVIVAL – We may require satisfactory proof of correct age at
any time. If any payment under this Contract depends on the payee being alive, we may require satisfactory proof of survival. 

  

					
	VE-6067 (11/14)		1		









  
 



 
 All other terms and conditions of the Contract remain unchanged. 

THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 
  

 
 



 

  

					
	VE-6067 (11/14)		2
#### § 4.61 Examination.

With any form of arthritis (except traumatic arthritis) it is essential that the examination for rating purposes cover all major joints, with especial reference to Heberden's or Haygarth's nodes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       5,370,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,117,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,952,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 91,739,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           120,333,000
<PP&E>                                     295,291,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (157,672,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             260,288,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,458,000
<BONDS>                                     24,647,000
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,249,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               260,288,000
<SALES>                                    284,687,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           284,687,000
<CGS>                                      220,067,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,960,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,784,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,124,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (367,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (757,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Christopher A. BURGER, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph KEMP, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

No. 81-7419.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 23, 1986.

William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellant, cross-appellee.

Joe Nursey, Andrea I. Young, Millard Farmer, Pamela L.J. Arangno, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.

Before VANCE and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD *, Senior District Judge.

*

 Honorable Clarence W. Allgood, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 13, 1986, 11 Cir., 785 F.2d 890).

PER CURIAM:

The panel opinion of March 13, 1986 should not be interpreted as requiring a defendant to place intent explicitly in issue before he can prevail on a challenge to burden shifting instructions on criminal intent. The panel majority simply noted that evidence of intent is more likely to be overwhelming where the defendant has not attempted to counter the state’s evidence on criminal intent.

With the foregoing clarification of the panel opinion the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, Fed.R.App.P. 35, 11th Cir. Rule 26, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Judge JOHNSON adheres to the viev/s previously expressed in his dissent from the panel opinion.
**EXHIBIT 3-1**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.**

**Pursuantto Section 242 of the**

**GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware**

 

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC., acorporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does herebycertify that:

**FIRST**:          TheBoard of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting held on December 6, 2005,duly adopted a resolution setting forth the proposed amendment to the RestatedCertificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”), declaringsuch amendment to be advisable and calling for the submission of such amendmentto the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval and stating that suchamendment will be effective only after an approval thereof by the stockholdersof the Corporation.

**SECOND**:     Thereafter,pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, suchamendment was submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation at a meetingheld on May 31, 2006, and such holders gave their approval and agreed to theadoption of the following resolution to amend the Certificate:

**RESOLVED,**that Article Fourth ofthe Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company be, and it hereby is,deleted in its entirety and the following Article Fourth is hereby inserted inits place:

“ARTICLEFOURTH:  The total number of shares ofcapital stock which the Corporation is authorized to issue shall be 51,000,000,of which 50,000,000 shall be shares of Common Stock having par value of $.10per share and 1,000,000 shall be shares of Preferred Stock having par value of$.10 per share.”

**THIRD**:         Suchamendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provision of Section 242 of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto sign my name and affirm that the statements madeherein are true under the penalty of perjury, this 9th day of June, 2006.
|   | THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | By:                        |   /s/  Elliot S. Orol |   |
|   |                       |   Elliot  S. Orol |
|   |                       |   Senior  Vice President |
|   |                       |     and  General Counsel |

 

1

----
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00316

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF D.D ., A JUVENILE

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 313

- J

- 2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

D.D. filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P . 42.1(a).

The motion states that the D.D. was “discharged from the Placement facility ordered by

the court and [D.D.] was released from Probation; therefore, there is no need to appeal

the previous order of the trial court as the subsequent trial court’s order discharging from

probation grants the relief that would have been requested on appeal.” Dismissal of this

appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be

entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismi ssed.In th e Matter of D.D

. Page 2 AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 15, 2017

[CV06]
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Silverado Gold
Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending May 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

*/s/ Garry L.
Anselmo*Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer

July 15, 2009

---