alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 287/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.287.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 287 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5430 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.287.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 287

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5430 September 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2011/C 287/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 2 | 1 |
| 2011/C 287/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Medicines Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1 | 7 |
| 2011/C 287/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1 | 11 |
| 2011/C 287/04 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1 | 15 |
| 2011/C 287/05 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European GNSS Agency (GSA) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1 | 19 |
| 2011/C 287/06 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1 | 23 |
| 2011/C 287/07 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the financial year 2011 | 27 |
| 2011/C 287/08 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2011 | 33 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2011/C 287/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 2

1

2011/C 287/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Medicines Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1

7

2011/C 287/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1

11

2011/C 287/04

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1

15

2011/C 287/05

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European GNSS Agency (GSA) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1

19

2011/C 287/06

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1

23

2011/C 287/07

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the financial year 2011

27

2011/C 287/08

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2011

33

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD v. THE UNITED STATES

[57 C. Cls. 268; 267 U. S. 395]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, the Supreme Court deciding;

1. Contracts for sale and- delivery of coal to the United States, *construed,*with the advertisements, specifications, and conduct of' *1023on cars at the mine; so that title passed then and the railroad transportation, on Government bills of lading, was subject to land-grant rates.

March 2, 1925.

2. Provisions in such contracts for service by the vendor in transferring the coal to barges at railroad destination, compensation therefor to he included in price of coal; and reserving right of United States to test coal after transportation and reject it if not up to specifications; *held,*not inconsistent with passing of title at time of delivery on cars at the mine.

3. Where the United States contracted for coal to be shipped by rail and delivered at a vessel, use of Government bills of lading and payment of freight by the United States at land-grant rates, were not enough to sustain a finding that the coal was the property of the United States when hauled by the railroad.

4. When a railroad company, entitled to charge the United States the full tariff rate, charges and receives the reduced land-grant rate with full knowledge of the facts, it is bound by its acquiescence and can not recover the difference.

the right of a railroad to charge extra for switching and transferring coal at destination depends upon road-haul revenue being equal to as much as a stated rate per ton, land-grant deductions from the latter allowed the United States are not to be considered in determining its liability to such extra charges.

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
#### § 1014.1 Scope of regulations in this part.

This part, known as Regulation N, is issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to implement the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act, Public L. 111-8, section 626, 123 Stat. 524 (Mar. 11, 2009), as amended by the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, Public Law 111-24, section 511, 123 Stat. 1734 (May 22, 2009), and as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Public Law 111-203, section 1097, 124 Stat. 1376 (July 21, 2010). This part applies to persons over which the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
§ 1022.24 Reasonable opportunity to opt out. ( a ) *In general.* You must not use eligibility information about a consumer that you receive from an affiliate to make a solicitation to the consumer about your products or services, unless the consumer is provided a reasonable opportunity to opt out, as required by § 1022.21(a)(1)(ii) of this part.
( b ) *Examples of a reasonable opportunity to opt out.* The consumer is given a reasonable opportunity to opt out if: ( 1 ) *By mail.* The opt-out notice is mailed to the consumer. The consumer is given 30 days from the date the notice is mailed to elect to opt out by any reasonable means.
( 2 ) *By electronic means.* ( i ) The opt-out notice is provided electronically to the consumer, such as by posting the notice at a Web site at which the consumer has obtained a product or service. The consumer acknowledges receipt of the electronic notice. The consumer is given 30 days after the date the consumer acknowledges receipt to elect to opt out by any reasonable means.
( ii ) The opt-out notice is provided to the consumer by email where the consumer has agreed to receive disclosures by email from the person sending the notice. The consumer is given 30 days after the email is sent to elect to opt out by any reasonable means.
( 3 ) *At the time of an electronic transaction.* The opt-out notice is provided to the consumer at the time of an electronic transaction, such as a transaction conducted on a Web site. The consumer is required to decide, as a necessary part of proceeding with the transaction, whether to opt out before completing the transaction. There is a simple process that the consumer may use to opt out at that time using the same mechanism through which the transaction is conducted.
( 4 ) *At the time of an in-person transaction.* The opt-out notice is provided to the consumer in writing at the time of an in-person transaction. The consumer is required to decide, as a necessary part of proceeding with the transaction, whether to opt out before completing the transaction, and is not permitted to complete the transaction without making a choice. There is a simple process that the consumer may use during the course of the in-person transaction to opt out, such as completing a form that requires consumers to write a “yes” or “no” to indicate their opt-out preference or that requires the consumer to check one of two blank check boxes; one that allows consumers to indicate that they want to opt out and one that allows consumers to indicate that they do not want to opt out.
( 5 ) *By including in a privacy notice.* The opt-out notice is included in a Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy notice. The consumer is allowed to exercise the opt-out within a reasonable period of time and in the same manner as the opt-out under that privacy notice.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2007 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the National Security 

Personnel System shall not apply with respect to certain laboratories 

within the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2007 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, 

and Mr. BOEHNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the 

National Security Personnel System shall not apply with 

respect to certain laboratories within the Department 

of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN LABORATORIES FROM 

4 NATIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9902(c)(1) of title 5, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking all that follows 

7 ‘‘a laboratory under paragraph (2)’’ and inserting a pe8 riod. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2007 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall be effective as of the date of the enact3 ment of this Act or September 30, 2008, whichever is ear4 lier. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
The First Connecticut Capital Corporation 10-QSB-A
         For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001


Exhibit


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the Quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by The First Connecticut
Capital Corporation (the "Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Registrant.



-------------------------------------      -------------------------------
Lawrence R. Yurdin                         Lawrence R. Yurdin
President and Chief Executive Officer      Chief Financial Officer









                                       28
<PAGE>
# C_2019121EN.01004001.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/40

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 121/08)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Quimper - Paris (Orly) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligation | 27 October 2019 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Order of 5 March 2019 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Quimper and Paris (Orly)
  NOR: TRAA1906145A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75 720 Paris cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Quimper - Paris (Orly)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligation

27 October 2019

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Order of 5 March 2019 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Quimper and Paris (Orly)

NOR: TRAA1906145A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75 720 Paris cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D.E.W., a child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 508

[ November 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Kirk C. Volker , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502019CJ000012 X XXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney,

Senior Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
300 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.  Bldg 1 Tempe, AZ 85281 Office: 602.852.6604 Exhibit 33.6 Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria 1. Carvana, LLC ( “Carvana”), as sponsor and administrator, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all publicly-registered asset-backed securities transactions for which Carvana acted as sponsor and administrator involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platform are set forth in Appendix A hereto. 2. Carvana used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All other servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to Carvana based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 4. Carvana has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Carvana’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period. March 29, 2023 Carvana, LLC By: Name: Paul W. Breaux Title: Vice President, Secretary /s/ Paul W. Breaux
 2  Appendix A  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Papua New Guinea

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Papua New Guinea			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea

During the review period, the government made significant progress in three areas, by (1) ensuring the budget provided a substantially full picture by including major sources of revenue and expenditure, (2) ensuring actual revenues and expenditures reasonably corresponded to those in the enacted budget, and (3) publishing a substantive audit.  The executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report were published online.  Information on debt obligations was not available in a reasonable period, including for state-owned enterprises.  The information in the budget was considered generally reliable.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not publish audits that covered the entire annual executed budget.  But for agencies it did audit, however, the most recent audit contained substantive findings and recommendations.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  Basic information was publicly available on how the government awarded natural resource extraction contracts in the mining sector, but not in the oil and gas sector.  The sovereign wealth fund had a sound legal framework and disclosed its source of funding and general approaches to withdrawals.

Papua New Guinea’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Publishing debt information in a reasonable period, including for state-owned enterprises;
- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and publishes complete audit reports within a reasonable period; and
- Making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Papua New Guinea 

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentPapua New Guinea

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# GreenbergTraurig

Dane McKaughan fel 5L2.32O.72OO Fax 512,320.72LO mcka ug ha nd @gtlaw. co m 

### March 

### 27,2015
Jeffrey 

### D. 

### Kyle, Clerk Courtof Appeals 

### -

### Third District of Texas Price 

### Daniel Sr. 

### Building 209 

### West l4th Street, 

### Room 101 

### Austin, 

### Texas 18701 Re 

### Court of Appeals 

### Number: 03-14-00302-CV 

### Trial Court Case 

### Number: D-l-GN-12-001695 

### Style: The 

### Railroad Commission 

### of Texas; CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a CenterPoint 

### Energt Entex; and CenterPoint 

### Energy Texas Gas v.

### Gulf Coast 

### Coalition 

## of Cities Dear 

### Mr. Kyle 

### I hereby 

### notify the Court that 

### I am 

### in receipt

### of the

### Court's March 

### 24,2015 notif,rcation that the above cause has been set

### for submission and oral argument on 

### May 20,2015 at 1:30 p.m. 

## I intend

### to argue

### this case 

### before 

### the Court on behalf 

### of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., 

### dlblaCenterPoint Energy 

### Entex; and CenterPoint Energy Texas Gas. S

Dane 

### DM/cd

AUS 536372378v1
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

### I ATTORNEYS AT LAW T WWW.GTLAW.COM 300 West 6th Street 

### r Suite2050

### r Austin, fX78701

### r Tel 512.320.7200

### r Fax 512.320.7210 ACCEPTED 03-14-00302-CV 4677781 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/27/2015 3:30:33 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
#### § 39.7 Line item adjustment to grants.

After a grant has been awarded, upon request from the State or Tribal Organization representative, VA may approve a change in one or more line items (line items are identified in Standard Form 424C) of up to 10 percent (increase or decrease) of the cost of each line item if the change would be within the scope or objective of the project and the aggregate adjustments would not increase the total amount of the grant.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)

[77 FR 4473, Jan. 30, 2012]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogenco International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David W. Brenman, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: January 17, 2003                                /s/ David W. Brenman
                                                       --------------------
                                                          David W. Brenman
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                        Chief Financial Officer







                                       10
#### § 21.7614 Changes of program.

In determining whether a change of program of education may be approved for the payments of educational assistance, VA will apply § 21.4234 of this part.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3691; Pub. L. 98-525, Pub. L. 101-366) (June 1, 1991)

[58 FR 50846, Sept. 29, 1993]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Gaming Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Frank DeRenzo, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Frank DeRenzo

Frank DeRenzo

President

October 4, 2004