alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2004



     * The originally  executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   250,143
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             15,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         274,613
<PP&E>                                                 5,778,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,923,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,354,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    178,422
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,176,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,354,820
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         781,272
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            560,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          220,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      220,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             299,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        9900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 56.604 Grant evaluation and award. ( a ) Within the limit of funds determined by the Secretary to be available the Secretary may award grants under this subpart to applicants therefor which will, in his judgment, provide needed health services in a catchment area which will not be served by another project funded under this part and meet the applicable requirements of section 319(d)(1)(C) of the Act and this subpart, in accordance with priorities established pursuant to section 319(b) of the Act and § 56.107 of subpart A of this part; *Provided,* That in the case of applicants which propose to serve substantially the same catchment areas or where available funds are insufficient to fund all approvable applications within a priority category specified in § 56.107, ( 1 ) Priority shall be given to applications submitted by community-based organizations which are representative of the population to be served by the project. For purposes of this paragraph, an applicant shall be deemed to be such an organization if it provides a formal mechanism (such as membership on the organization's governing body or membership on an advisory body) which gives migratory seasonal agricultural workers and their families significant involvement in the formulation of the organization's policies; and
( 2 ) Where all such applicants are community-based organizations representative of the population to be served by the project, the Secretary shall award the grant to the applicants which will, in his judgment, best promote the purposes of section 319(d)(1)(C) of the Act and the applicable regulations of this part, taking into account with respect to each application: ( i ) The degree to which the proposed project satisfactorily provides for the elements set forth in § 56.203;
( ii ) The administrative and management capability of the applicant;
( iii ) The extent to which community resources will be utilized in the project; and
( iv ) The degree to which the applicant intends to integrate services supported by a grant under this part with health services provided under other federally assisted health services or reimbursement programs or projects.
719 A.2d 980

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. John David ASH, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 62

Sept. Term, 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 23, 1998.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and John David Ash, Respondent. The Court having considered the petition, it is this 23rd day of October, 1998,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, John David Ash, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3 and 1.4 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

*659ORDERED that the Respondent’s law practice shall be monitored for a period of one year by Charles E. Kountz, Jr., Esquire, who is charged with the responsibility of making quarterly reports to Bar Counsel concerning the Respondent’s law practice management during that period; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland the sum of $492.75, for which amount judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against John David Ash.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Amit Joshi, Chief Financial Officer of Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Apollo Debt Solutions (the “registrant”);




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: March 30, 2022



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Amit Joshi         
|    | Amit Joshi             
|    | Chief Financial Officer





---
Page 3 of 31
Page 4 of 31
Page 5 of 31
Page 6 of 31
Page 7 of 31
Page 8 of 31
Page 9 of 31
Page 10 of 31
Page 11 of 31
Page 12 of 31
Page 13 of 31
Page 14 of 31
Page 15 of 31
Page 16 of 31
Page 17 of 31
Page 18 of 31
Page 19 of 31
Page 20 of 31
Page 21 of 31
Page 22 of 31
 

 

 

Page 23 of 31
 

 

 

 

Page 24 of 31
 

Page 25 of 31
 

 

 

 

 

Page 26 of 31
 

 

 

 

 

Page 27 of 31
 

 

 

Page 28 of 31
 

Page 29 of 31
 

 

 

Page 30 of 31
Page 31 of 31
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JUAN CARRILLO, a.k.a. Cholo, Defendant - Appellant. No. 12-50445 D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00442-PA-20
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 27, 2013 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Juan Carrillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the condition of supervised release requiring him to abstain from consuming alcohol. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

# FILED
NOV 20 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Carrillo did not object to the condition of supervised release in the district court, and we therefore review for plain error. See United States v. MacielVasquez , 458 F.3d 994, 996 n.3 (9th Cir. 2006). Because there is “some indication in the record of a problem of abuse,” the district court did not plainly err when it imposed the condition of supervised release requiring Carrillo to abstain from alcohol. See United States v. Betts , 511 F.3d 872, 881 (9th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Vega , 545 F.3d 743, 747-48 (9th Cir. 2008) (recognizing the connection between drug abuse and alcoholabuse when affirming a condition of supervised release prohibiting the consumption of alcohol). AFFIRMED
.

12-50445 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

COMPANY SECRETARIAL DEPARTMENT                  [DIAGEO LOGO]

                                                DIAGEO PLC
                                                8 Henrietta Place
                                                London W1G 0NB

                                                Tel: +44 (0)20 7927 5200
                                                Fax: +44 (0)20 7927 4708



7 March 2002


Lord Blyth of Rowington
Windmill House
Finwood Road
Rowington
Warwickshire CV35 7DF                                                   Personal


Dear James

Following a review of remuneration received by the Chairmen of major UK-based
companies, the Board has decided to increase your total remuneration to Pound
Sterling 450,000 with effect from 1st January 2002.

As discussed, we have agreed that it is appropriate for this additional
remuneration to be in the form of Diageo shares, in order to demonstrate further
the alignment of your interests with those of the shareholders. However, we have
received legal advice that this would require a change in the Company's Articles
- which would not practical until the next AGM in October 2002.

You have, accordingly, undertaken as follows:

1.   You will apply the after tax amount of the increase in remuneration (Pound
     Sterling 150,000), and of any future increase to the purchase of ordinary
     shares in Diageo, pursuant to a standing order with Stocktrade. You will
     instruct Stocktrade to advise the Company Secretary's office of each such
     purchase, as your agent, so that the appropriate notification can be made
     to the London Stock Exchange.

2.   You will retain such shares until such time as you retire from the Company
     or cease to be a director for any other reason.

3.   The next review of your fees will not be before 1st January 2003 and any
     such review will be dependent on any material change of the remuneration of
     Non Executive Chairmen.

4.   Finally, it is confirmed that the role of Chairman of Diageo is expected to
     need an average of three days per week of your time.



<PAGE>

Please confirm that the above accurately reflects our discussion, and that you
agree to be legally bound by the above undertakings, by signing and returning
the enclosed copy of this letter to me.


Yours sincerely

/s/ Roger Myddelton


ROGER MYDDELTON
COMPANY SECRETARY


Signed: /s/ Blyth                               DATE: 7 MARCH 2002
                                                      ------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   November 8, 2005

/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 8, 2005

/s/ Matthew Farrell
Matthew Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         269
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                   8847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             10656
<PP&E>                                     3107938
<DEPRECIATION>                            (1510639)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3207955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3515240
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                  44347955
<OTHER-SE>                               (44655240)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3207955
<SALES>                                      15859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             15859
<CGS>                                        14601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                14601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            807286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (806028)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (806028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7361

WILLIE J. WHITE, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus COLIE L. RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02757-CMC) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie J. White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Willie J. White seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s orders denying his § 2254 petition and his motion for reconsideration were entered on the docket on May 23, 2006 and June 20, 2006, respectively. The notice of appeal was filed on July 21, 2006. *Because White failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately- 3 - presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 756/2005

of 18 May 2005         

fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2783/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin (3), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003.

(3)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 104. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2916/95 (OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49).

(4)OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 563/2005 (OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 42).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 18 May 2005 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

                     ‘ANNEX I

----

(1)  Origin of imports:

----