alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert F.X.Sillerman, certify that:

(1)          I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of CKX, Inc.

(2)          Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in thisquarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 8, 2006      |
|----------------------------------|
| /s/ ROBERT F.X. SILLERMAN        |   |
| Robert F.X. Sillerman            |
| *Chief  Executive Officer and*   |
| *Chairman  of the Board*         |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |

 

----
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Chad

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Chad			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Chad 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Chad

During the review period, the government published its enacted budget within a reasonable period of time but not its executive budget proposal.  The government also produced within a reasonable period of time an end-of-year report, although it lacked detail on ministry-level spending. The government sought to improve budget transparency by upgrading its citizens’ budget and online budget portal and by livestreaming parliamentary discussions of the budget.  Budget documents did not include all revenues and expenditures.  Detailed information on debt obligations was publicly available, with the exception of debt information for the country’s only major state-owned enterprise, Société des Hydrocarbures du Tchad (SHT).  SHT also did not have publicly available audited financial statements.  The government maintained some off-budget accounts not subject to audit or oversight.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence or produce public reports.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were specified in law and regulation, but the government did not always appear to follow applicable laws and regulations in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available. Chad’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing online an executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report within a reasonable period of time;
- including all revenues and expenditures in the budget;
- eliminating off-budget accounts or subjecting them to audit and oversight;
- publishing audited financial statements and disclosing debt holdings for significant, large state-owned enterprises;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- making supreme audit institution reports publicly available; and
- adhering to the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses as set out in applicable laws and regulations.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Chad 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsChadDivision for International Finance and Development

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2021-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 20, 2024


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
Docket Number FAA - 2014 - 0490
EX-4.c



 CONTRACT DATA PAGE 

Contract Number:
[P9999999999]                        Contract Date: [May 2, 2011] 

 

			
	Owner: [JOHN DOE]		[Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]      Age at Issue: [35]]
		
	[Owner: [JANE DOE]		Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]
		
	Annuitant: [JOHN DOE]		Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]       Age at Issue: [35]
		
	[Annuitant: [JANE DOE]		Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]

 Beneficiary: As named by You 

Initial Purchase Payment: [$10,000.00] 
 Purchase
Payment Age Limit: [Prior to the 86th birthday] 
 Minimum Subsequent Purchase Payment:
[$500] 
 Fixed Account Options – Minimum Guarantee Rate: [1.0% - 3.0%] 

Minimum Partial Withdrawal Amount: [$1,000] 
 Maximum
Penalty-Free Withdrawal Percentage: [10%] 
 Minimum Systematic Withdrawal Amount: [$100] 

Minimum Amount Remaining After a Partial Withdrawal: [$2,500] 

Withdrawal Charge Schedule: 
  





 
 See Page 11 for Withdrawal Provisions. 

  

					
	AS-993-PPS7 (12/10)		3		










 CONTRACT DATA PAGE (Cont’d.) 

 

 Minimum Transfer Amount: [$100] 

Separate Account Charge (including guaranteed death benefit risk charge of [0.10%]): [1.15%] 

Annual Contract Maintenance Fee: [$50] 
 Transfer
Fee: [$25] 
 Earliest Annuity Date After Contract Date: [Two years] 

Latest Annuity Date: [1st day of the month following Age 95] 

Separate Account: [Variable Separate Account] 
  





 

  

					
	AS-993-PPS7 (12/10)		4
#### Commonwealth v. Glorioso

*Bernard E. DUoseph,*for Commonwealth.

*Jules Pearlstine,*for defendant.

March 25, 1957.

Knight, P. J.,

Defendant was arrested for violating section 1016(a) of The Vehicle Code of May 1,1929, P. L. 905. The information would leave one to believe that the violation took place in the presence of the arresting officer. The present motion was filed asking that the information be quashed because the violation did not take place in the presence of the arresting officer, but it was made by said officer upon information received.

The district attorney and counsel for defense entered into a stipulation that the violation did not take place in the presence of the officer who made the information, but was made by said officer upon information received.

The information does not state that the officer believed the information given him to be true. This is necessary: Commonwealth v. Hockenberry, 72 D. *&*C. 274 (1950); Commonwealth v. Herbein, 68 Montg. 225; Commonwealth v. Barnett, 16 Dist. R. 321.

And now, March 25th, 1957, the motion is allowed and the information is ^quashed. Costs are to be paid by the County of Montgomery.
EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | 1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | IR      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC. |
|                             |                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| Date: October      17, 2008 | By:                      | /s/ Michael K.      Wilhelm                              |
|                             | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                             |                               |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2602 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2602

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
  To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Iron 
  Mountain, Michigan, as the ``Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Medical Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY, 
IRON MOUNTAIN, MICHIGAN.
    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Iron 
Mountain, Michigan, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 
be known and designated as the ``Oscar G. Johnson Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''. Any reference to that medical 
facility in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper 
of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the Oscar 
G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Morgan Keegan, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,812
<RECEIVABLES>                                  724,710
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            582,415
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           21,468
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            490,165
<PP&E>                                          26,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,937,127
<SHORT-TERM>                                   254,500
<PAYABLES>                                     969,858
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   165,220
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              6,336
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             178,644
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,612
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,937,127
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               37,683
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            24,295
<COMMISSIONS>                                   39,854
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   12,166
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   12,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,289
<COMPENSATION>                                  63,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,496
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,496
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,796
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44


</TABLE>
#### § 1.700 Purpose.

Sections 1.700 through 1.705 of this title provide a Missing Children Official Mail Program in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3220(a)(2), 5 U.S.C. 301)

[60 FR 48387, Sept. 19, 1995]
RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### JAN21 2015 

### AbelAcosta, Clerk NO. ECH862-07 IN TOE CCURT CF CRIMimL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

CHARLES CAMP

Appellent
VS STATE CF TEXAS Appellee 

## FILED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEAls 

## JAN 232015 AbelAcosta, Clerk

Eton AppealNo. 02-13-CO247-CR/02-13-00248-CR/ 02-13-CO248-CR/02-13-O025CKR Cn Appeal frati The Seacnd District ofTexas ( Tarrant County/ Texas 

### "Trial Court No. 132456R/1324668RA324671R/1324677R

E3RSP MMEN BOR EXDQETCNCF TDCTO EHE EEananm kr niHSErEOTRZ fewb* TO THE FnCRABLE JUDGES CF THE CCURT CF CRIMINAL APFEALS: 

### Ctmas now, Charles Canp, Petitioner, aid files this Motionfor an extension of sixty (GO) days in which to file petiticn for Discreticnary Review. In support of this notion, appellant shows the Court the following: I The Petitioner was convicted in the 297th District Cburt 'of Tarrant County, Texas of the cffense cf Aggravated Rdcbery in Trial Curt Kb. 1324G67R/0324668R/1324671R and 1324S77R styled State ofTexas vs Charles Canp. ThePetitioner appealed to the Court ofAppeals, SecondDistrict. The case was affirmed Decenber 11, 2014. 

### Thepresent deadline for filing the Petiticn for Discretionary Review is Janurary 10, 2015. ThePetitioner has not requested any extension prior to this request. in 

### Petitioner's request for an extension is based onthe following facts: 1. Petitioner was not informed of the decision of the Court ofAppeals inAffirming his case until January 2, 2014. (1)2. Petitioner is proceeding pro se as a layman and is unskilled and unknowledgeablein natters of law and legal procedure. 

### 3. Petitioners' access to legal research materials located within the priscn unit lawlibrary is limited to approximately 8-12 hours per week. 4. The claims presented for review en appeal by appellate counsel present numerous, caiplex 

### issues which require a substantial amount oftine for Petitioner as a layman in researching 

### and dessaninating legal principles andprocedures in meaningfullypreparing andpresenting Pe titicn for Discretionary Review in this case. 5. Petitionerdoes not seek additional time to file Petiticn for Discretionary Review for undue delay. 

### Wt£HkKH4, Petitioner prays this Cburt grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing Petition for Discreticnary Review in CauseNo. PD-0852-07 up to and including March 11,2015.

(2) Respectfully Submitted, Charles Canp / Petitioner, Ero Se Texas DspartnBnt of Criminal Justice Institutional DL vision F.M. Robertson Unit TDCJ-ID# 1857911 Abilene, TX 79601

# ^0. ftp* \2-?>P3> cCAr^vTDL £>T*7\oU _^£>£iA,JLl^Jlfb1_V\^La^>-

OfrpOjtflU % Zj&tC



## <U:'V)o. Pfr-PW2--01 f'ftlW >rf STVrg
J)lM._JL\£<UL(_ _E.fcLCilfe5.ai _«5_r j^liiift v*A VUl _vbw_. r\0<w\>_^t.X <y><^ ^>K\<^ g.AU^e,. t.s *&-£^\«x>g-f's L_Sj____cV__<_i:__» 

### "^) ^^.Vvtfi-x^A V^JVaa^ __.^<&. ?aJ^>^r\.«JO--Cv5 

## 0«rl^<>._<. ,v\«-^i-v> Arvr So-sfA^Si-,-.
~T»Naw\£. Kl~fv^ Jf&T UCW A^<w«- Q^J> <Art4 CyS-S^W^t^— C*- i-ClA^ M-sJfcar,

J_=A ,u &JLA.<JSL 

### C***Js

_ (IMcwVa-'S C.g 

## _£*jq___ wv^r Y^*_j> b_-



## A^Ux-^^rv. i.ciu,( RECEIVEDIN 

### COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

## JAN 21 2015 

## AbelAcosta, Clerk
41731.

#### MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, INC. v. HILL et al.

Submitted January 4, 1966

Decided January 19, 1966.

*Adams, Adams & Brennan, Edward T. Brennan,*for appellant. *Andrew Benton,*for appellees.

Pannell, Judge.

One question in this case is whether the exemptions contained in U. S. C. A., Title 46, § 601, may apply to a wife alone rather than jointly to a wife and minor children. That section with its proviso reads as follows:

“No wages due or accruing to any seaman or apprentice shall be subject to attachment or arrestment from any court, and every payment of wages to a seaman or apprentice shall be valid in law, notwithstanding any previous sale or assignment of wages or of any attachment, encumbrance, or arrestment thereon; and no assignment or sale of wages or of salvage made prior to the accruing thereof shall bind the party making the same, except such allotments as are authorized by this title. This section shall apply to fishermen employed on fishing vessels as well as to seamen: *Provided,*That nothing contained in this or any preceding section shall interfere with the order by any court regarding the payment by any seaman of any part of his wages for the support and maintenance of his wife and minor children. Mar. 4, 1915, c. 153, § 12, 38 Stat. 1169.” There is an additional proviso to this section which is not here material.

Another question is whether the payment to the defendant in fi. fa., the seaman, upon the oral advice of the Shipping Commissioner to the garnishee (without any submission in writing *13or arbitration, U. S. C. A., Title 46, § 651) relieved the garnishee because noncompliance would have subjected the garnishee to certain penalties provided in the event of nonpayment of wages to the seaman. 46 U. S. C. A., § 596.

Both these questions have been answered contrary to the contentions of the garnishee in Rennebaum v. Rennebaum (1959) 194 NYS2d 653 (22 Misc.2d 614), citing Cunningham v. McCullough, 22 NYS2d 739, n. o. r.; Mickenheim v. Cathcart, 228 La. 890 (84 S2d 449, 54 ALR2d 1418); Avilla v. Avilla, 81 Cal.App.2d 210 (183 P2d 668); see also, Zwingmann v. Zwingmann, 150 App. Div. 358 (134 NYS 1077); Collie v. Ferguson, 281 U.S. 52 (50 SC 189, 74 LE 696); Feldman v. American Palestine Line, (S.D.N.Y.), 25 F2d 1002.

We concur in the ruling in that case. It is obvious that the proviso is for the protection of both the wife and the minor children, the wife alone, the children alone, or the wife and children together. If, as appellant contends, the benefits of the proviso are joint to the wife and children, and that only, the children of a seaman could not secure support out of his wages unless support was granted to a wife also. This, obviously, is not the intent of the statute, as shown by the cases cited in Rennebaum v. Rennebaum, supra.

The trial court did not err in so deciding.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Felton, *C. J., and Frankwm, J., concur.*