alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## List of Attachments 

# /.

2.

3.



# 7· Int ernational Labour [sic] Office ( 1971, I 972) Chemical Burn s. In: Encyc lopaed ia o f Occupationa l Health and Safet y, Volume 1

- A

- K, pages 22 0-221 Internationa l Labour Office , C H 1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland , 1971. Special McGraw

- Hill Edition , 1972, Library o f Co ngress Card Nu mb er: 74-39329 , In ternationa l Standard Book N um ber: 07-079555-X

. May 6, 2007 compla int to the FBI a nd Co ngres s from Cate J enkins, Ph

. D. , "Co mplaint a nd Add itional Evidence of p/11-i-aud by : USGS , OSI/A, ATSDR. NYC, EPA, and EPA-j imd ed sc i e ntist s; (I} Falsification o.fco rr osive pH data for WTC dust , (2) Historicalji·aud by HPA of hazardous pH leve ls s in ce 1980

. " http :l/ v.-vi\V.scribd.com f doc/451 8 0048 /Jcn kin s-050607-F BI-W TC'**-p~ -LI**  E S- 1 s t-('omplain t Octobe r I 3, 2008 co mplaint to FBI fr om C at e Jenkins , Ph.D. ,**"S uppl** **nt ll** **~·vidence:** Fraud in the Conduct and Dissemination 

### t?{ Human '/'issue Co rr osivit y Data (p H t ests) in th e Ajiermath of I he World Trade Ce nter Disaster ." http: //www.scribcl.com / doc/ 45 1 &04 I 0 /J e nkin s -1 0 130 8-FBI -Ncw

- WTC-p ii-Li es- ? nd- Co rnpl a int
R

o bert W. Dellinger , former Director , Materials Recovery and Waste Manag e ment D ivision, EPA, hand- written co mments on J e nkin s' May 6, 2007 comp laint to t h e FBI and Co n gress. August 16 , 2 0 I 0 Declaration of Rober1 W. Dellinger (under penalty of p e rjury) April 22,2 011 Depo s ition of Robert W. D e lling er , former Dir ector, Material s Recover y and Wa ste Managem e nt Division , EPA, pp. I 61- I 76. July 29,2011 Declaration of Greg o ry Hel ms (under p e nalty of p e rjury)



### 38
#### § 1013.6 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Class Tuition Waiver

AGENCY: Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 3, 2009, the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 
(Plans), Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Personnel and Readiness), signed a memorandum to the Director, 
Department of Defense Education Activity, designating for enrollment on 
a space-available, tuition-free basis, classes of dependents of 
military and diplomatic personnel whose nations participated in the 
Partnership for Peace (PfP) Program in Brussels and Mons, Belgium; 
Naples, Italy; London, United Kingdom; Brunssum, the Netherlands; and 
Oberammergau, Germany, prior to gaining status as full members of NATO 
during the period between January 2009 and January 2014. Subject to the 
availability of space, this waiver may be applied for the duration of 
the sponsor's tour not to exceed a total of three years for each 
eligible dependent. This class waiver is effective immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mike Lynch, 4040 North Fairfax 
Drive, Arlington, VA 22203-1635.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please note that the availability of space 
in the Defense Dependents' Education System varies from year to year 
and is not guaranteed. Commanders should ensure that enrollments are 
timely and do not disrupt the dependent's or school's educational 
program.

    Dated: September 23, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-23416 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
| | Exhibit 34.2
| | ------------



Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association



We have examined management’s assertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association
(the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides
trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, except for
servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the servicing platform covered by this
report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine
whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated
or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, for the U.S. Bank
Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 21, 2021
CRIMINAL LAW.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

November Term, 1887.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### *JOHN J. MASSA v. STATE OF OHIO.

Averment as to Special Grade of a City.

The court cannot take judicial notice that a city is one of a certain grade or class to which a special statute applies only, and an information filed in the police court charging a violation of such a statute, must aver the fact.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

E. G. Hewitt, for plaintiff in error.

J. C. Schwartz, prosecuting attorney police court, for state.

*

 For decision of common pleas court in this case see 9 Dec. R., 000 (s. c. 17 B., 175.)

By the Court.

The plaintiff in error was charged in the police court of the city of Cincinnati, with the violation of the statute, entitled, “An act to prevent the sale of intoxicating liquors in the cities of the first grade of the first class, during certain hours therein named,” passed April 30, 1885, 82 O. L., 185. The information filed against him, while containing all other proper averments, did not allege that the city of Cincinnati, in which the offense was charged to have been committed, was a “city of the first grade of the first class.” A demurrer was filed to this information, on the ground that it did not state an offense punishable by the laws of the state, which was overruled by the court, and objection taken by the defendant. Trial was then had, and the defendant found guilty by the court, and adjudged to pay a fine of $-and the costs. A motion in arrest of judgment was then filed on the same ground, which was also overruled by the court, and exception taken. To reverse this judgment, a petition in error was filed in the court of common pleas, but on hearing it was affirmed, and this proceeding in error is prosecuted seeking the reversal of the judgment of that court.

Held: That under the terms of the statute in question, it was essential to the sufficiency of such information, that it should allege that the city of Cincinnati was a city of the first grade of the first class. The court could not 'take judicial notice that such is the fact. It is one which must be alleged and proved. Bolton v. Cleveland, 35 O. S., 319, 321.
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO Bridgecrest Credit Company OFFICERS CERTIFICATE The
undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit Company (the Servicer), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit
Company, and certifies that:  1.
I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period June 3, 2021 through December 31,
2021 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and  2.
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has
substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is
delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021-N2 Servicing Agreement dated as of June 3, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust
2021-N2, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This certificate is dated as of December 31, 2021.  By: /s/ Daniel GaudreauDaniel GaudreauChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tam Cheuk Ho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Tam Cheuk Ho

Tam Cheuk Ho
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
#### David ROTHGEB et ux *v.*SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY of America

75-320

534 S.W. 2d 759

Opinion delivered March 29, 1976

*531*Parker & Henry,*for appellants.

*Barnett, Wheatley, Smith & Deacon,*for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants brought this action to recover damages under the provisions of a blanket corporate surety bond issued by appellee on the members of the Arkansas Realtors Association. A surety bond is required by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 71-1305 (c) (Supp. 1975). Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment inasmuch as there existed material issues of fact.

It appears the undisputed facts are that Wimpy and Steele, a real estate partnership, owned some property which they sold to appellants. Appellants brought this action for damages against Wimpy and Steele, individually and as partners, alleging that Wimpy committed acts during the course of their dealings with them which were in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 71-1307 (Supp. 1975). Also appellee surety was joined as a defendant pursuant to the provisions of § 71-1305. Wimpy and Steele declared bankruptcy. Appellee moved for a summary judgment on the basis that Wimpy and Steele were the owners of the property at the time appellants contracted with them and, therefore, Wimpy, as an owner of the property, was not functioning as a real estate agent within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 71-1301, et seq. (Supp. 1975), at the time of the transaction. Alternatively, it was asserted that appellee’s blanket statutory $2,000 bond with the Arkansas Realtors Association provided that it did not extend coverage to the members of that group who were bonded, as Wimpy was here, under another real estate broker’s bond.

We must agree with appellee’s position that since Wimpy was selling land owned by him and Steele, he could not be considered an agent or broker, which requires a license, within the meaning of § 71-1302. If Wimpy was acting solely as the owner, he would not come within the provisions of § 71-1302. Cf. *Phillips*v. *Ark. Real Estate Comm.,*244 Ark. 577, *532426 S.W. 2d 412 (1968). Likewise, since the property was jointly owned by him and his partner, Steele, the act is not applicable to them.

We deem it unnecessary to discuss appellee’s alternative motion for a summary judgment.

Affirmed.

Byrd, J., not participating.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

146
KA 11-01849

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMAL COOKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered July 18, 2011. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq. ). Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Specifically, defendant contends that, because his sentence for the underlying sex offense did not include a period of postrelease supervision, it was determined that he is not a risk to the community, and the lack of postrelease supervision therefore constitutes a mitigating factor warranting a downward departure. We reject that contention. A downward departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where “there exists a[] . . . mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]; see People v Coffey , 45 AD3d 658, 658). Inasmuch as defendant’s release from prison without “official” supervision is a factor adequately taken into account by risk factor 14 (Release Environment: Supervision) of the Risk Assessment Instrument (RAI), it is not a mitigating factor warranting a downward departure ( see generally People v Riverso , 96 AD3d 1533, 1534). Indeed, the RAI assesses more points to a defendant released without official supervision because “[s]trict supervision is essential when a sex offender is released into the community” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 17). Additionally, we note that, although other law enforcement personnel-2- 146
KA 11-01849

involved in defendant’s criminal action may have determined that defendant could be released without supervision following his incarceration, that determination is not controlling on the SORA court’s risk level determination ( see generally People v Jackson , 70 AD3d 1385, 1386, lv denied 14 NY3d 714).

Entered: March 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,949
<SECURITIES>                                 2,153,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                  988,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,219,939
<PP&E>                                       1,104,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                 171,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,161,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,883,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,161,356
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                185,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,858
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE 1997 ACQUISITIONS OF WISCONSIN BAN CORP. AND CITIZENS 
NATIONAL BANCORPORATION INC. AND BANCSECURITY CORPORATION.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          59,854
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             887
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                42,568
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    325,498
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         151,322
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           156,604
<LOANS>                                      1,511,265
<ALLOWANCE>                                     20,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,156,215
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,770,500
<SHORT-TERM>                                    93,609
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,995
<LONG-TERM>                                     68,422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,404
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,156,215
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 97,455
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,445
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,272
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               120,172
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              53,176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,747
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           61,425
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,166
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  85
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 39,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,233
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      29,233
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,046
<LOANS-PAST>                                       901
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,864
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,292
<RECOVERIES>                                       532
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            20,150
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans will meet on October 27-29, 2009, in the Pan American Room at the Capital Hilton, 1001 16th Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 until 4:30 p.m., each day. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding the needs of women Veterans with respect to health care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and activities administered by VA designed to meet such needs. The Committee makes recommendations to the Secretary regarding such programs and activities.

The agenda will include updates on recommendations from the 2006 and 2008 reports, and briefings on VA/National Guard and Reserves initiatives, prosthetic services for women Veterans, Veterans employment initiatives, readjustment counseling, and homeless initiatives for women Veterans.

                    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Ms. Shannon L. Middleton at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Women Veterans (00W), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone at (202) 461-6193, fax at (202) 273-7092, or e-mail at                     *00W@mail.va.gov.*                     Interested persons may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Committee. Written statements must be filed before the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting.                

Dated: September 25, 2009.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-23577 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### § 21.7305 Conflicting interests.

In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4005.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3036)

[62 FR 55761, Oct. 28, 1997]