alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sarah Killen, Plaintiff, *v.*The Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Kings Trial Term,

April, 1900.)

Negligence — Contributory negligence as ordinarily a question of fact.

Where a woman of unimpaired health, faculties and physical activities, is hit, while crossing an unobstructed street during daylight and about the middle of a. block, by the front of the fender of a trolley car approaching her and seen by her as far away as the nearest intersecting street, the question of her contributory negligence is one-which must be- submitted to the jury.

Action for damages for negligence. Motion on the minutes by the defendant for a new trial.

*291Thos. F. Magner for plaintiff.

Isaac B. Oeland for defendant.

Gayitor, J.:

The plaintiff showed herself on the witness stand to be more than ordinarily alert in her perceptive faculties and understanding; and she is of unimpaired health and physical activity. She went straight across the street in the middle of a block 200 feet long, and was hit by the front of the fender of a passing trolley car. She says she neither saw nor heard the car coming, nor looked to see if one was coming; except that at the curb she looked and saw the car at or approaching the next street crossing,' apparently slowed or slowing down for the crossing. There was no other car or vehicle in the block; in fine it was entirely clear. Ror was there anything to distract her attention, and it was broad daylight. How under such conditions such a person could walk in front of a trolley car and get hit by it without being negligent I am unable to even imagine. For the plaintiff to say she did not see or hear the car seems to me to be only saying that she was not looking; for if she was looking in the most ordinary way it seems to me she could not help knowing the car was there. The case of a person crossing a crowded street and hit like the plaintiff where pedestrians have to go close to cars because of their number, and malee close shaves in order to cross at all, would of course present a question of fact in respect of the plaintiff’s negligence. But it is settled in this judicial department by the appeal from the non-suit in this case at the former trial (48 App. Div. 557), and also by *Hickman*v. *Nassau El. R. R. Co.*(41 App. Div. 629), that cases like that of this plaintiff also present a question of fact on that head.

The motion for a new trial is denied.
SCALE 1:24,000

SPRINGFIELD SOUTH QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-G

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Springfield South Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Janet R. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2010

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1958.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Map units were reproduced from Hartshorn and Koteff (1967).

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 23 of 24)

(WE

S

T

S

P

RIN

G

FIELD)

(HA

M

P

D

E

N)

(SPRINGFIELD NORTH)

(BROAD BROOK) 72°30'0"W

72°30'0"W

72°37'30"W

72°37'30"W

42°7'30"N

42°7'30"N

42°0'0"N

42°0'0"N

Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., compilers, 2010,

Surficial geologic map of the Heath-Northfield-SouthwickHampden 24-quadrangle area in the Connecticut Valley

region, west-central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-G.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/G.
From

: Boyd . Rochelle @ epamail . epa . gov Sent : Thursday , October 21 , 2010 12:53 PM To : Robert Strieter Cc : Michael . Palazzolo @ alcoa . com Subject : EPA - HQ- OAR - 2002-0031-0017 [ 1 ]. pdf - Adobe Reader I am working on the Primary Aluminum RTR and the Risk Assessment Group plans to re - run the risk models in December and I noticed in the comments that the Association did not want us to use a factor of 10 for the acute exposure factors . In the absence of data this is the default value that they typically use . Do you have any data that we can use to support your argument for the 4 to 6 times the average instead ? We would have to do an Acute Effects technical support document to go along with whatever standard we propose as to why we chose the 4 or 6 factor . Thanks . Rochelle Boyd , Environmental Engineer U . S . Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T . W

. Alexander Drive , RTP , NC 27711 Mail Drop D 243 - 02 Ph : ( 919) 541 - 1390 Fax : ( 919) 541 - 3207 Email : boyd . rochelle @ epa . gov
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification



I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2021 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.       Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.       Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.       I
am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects;
and



5.       All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).







|Date: January 21, 2022 | By: | /s/ Rajesh Kalathur                        
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Rajesh Kalathur                            
|                       |     | President of John Deere Capital Corporation
|                       |     | (as Servicer)
#### Guiseppe Grimaldi, Appellant, *v.*Associazione Fraterna Italiana, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Rew York, third • district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendant.

John Palmieri, for appellant.

Achille J. Oishei, for respondent.

0’Gorman, J.

Plaintiff’s claim for sick benefits is resisted on the ground that h.e obtained admission to the society by false representations. While the evidence offered upon the trial amply supported this defense, the plaintiff was, nevertheless, entitled to recover, inasmuch as there was a waiver on the part of the defendant by its acceptance of dues from the plaintiff, with full knowledge of the falsity of the representations now complained of.

Plaintiff became a member of the defendant association in January, 1898. In June, 1899, he was taken ill, and then informed the president of the defendant, as well as defendant’s physician, that prior to his admission into the society, he had been subject to attacks of epilepsy. This is the principal evidence now relied upon by the defendant. ' It appears, however, without contradiction, that notwithstanding this disclosure as to his previous physical condition, the defendant paid the plaintiff sick benefits for his illness in June, 1899; permitted him to remain in the association thereafter, and continued to receive dues •from him down to the time of his illness in question, which occurred in August, 1899. This conduct on the part of the defendant, with full knowledge of the falsity of the statements *746in plaintiff’s application for admission into the society, precludes the defendant from now availing itself of the defense interposed in this action. McCormick v. Cath. Relief *&*Benefit Assn., 56 N. Y. Supp. 905.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Beekmak, P. J., and Giegerich, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2021 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| Date: January 26, 2023 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SS.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John N. Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IR
      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.Date:
      November 16, 2009
            By:
            /s/ John
      N.
      FermanisJohn
      N. FermanisChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 4.99


 


 The Guaranty Contract


 


Contract No.: SJZ0910120140044-15


Guarantor : Hebei Ruijie Hospitality management Limited


Guarantee :
Hua Xia Bank Shijiazhuang Jianhua Branch


 


Signing Date : October 8, 2014


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party B
(Guarantee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trading Co., Ltd., Party A (Guarantor) is willing to provide guaranty for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB150,000,000


 


Pledge Term
: From July19,2015 to July18,2017
#### § 10.2 Evidence required of loss, destruction or mutilation of adjusted service certificate.

The veteran named in an adjusted service certificate issued pursuant to the provisions of section 501 of the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, or the person entitled to payment thereon will be required to furnish evidence of the nonreceipt of the adjusted service certificate, or of its receipt in a mutilated or defaced condition, or of the loss or destruction in whole or in part of defacement of the certificate after its receipt, as the case may be. The evidence must be sufficient to establish to the satisfaction of the Secretary that neither the veteran nor the person entitled to payment thereon, or any person for or on their behalf, received the adjusted service certificate, or that at the time of its receipt it was mutilated or defaced to such an extent as to impair its value, or that after receipt of the certificate it was lost or destroyed in whole or in part or defaced, but without bad faith on the part of the veteran, and that every effort has been made to recover the lost certificate. Unless determination is otherwise made by the Secretary the evidence must be in the form of a written statement sworn to by the veteran or person entitled to payment thereon and witnessed by at least two persons who shall state, under oath that they personally know the affiant, that they have read his or her statement and that it is true to the best of their knowledge and belief. These statements should be supplemented by affidavits of any persons having personal knowledge of additional facts and circumstances concerning the matter, and the Secretary may require any additional evidence deemed necessary.
----

# Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

      -  Home
      -  About
      -  Search
      -  List All

## Search Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

    This web site provides public access and preservation services for the nearly 5,000 CD-ROMs, DVDs, and floppy disks distributed by the GPO under the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP).  These tangible products have been received through the FDLP since the 1980s and consist of millions of individual files containing fundamental data on economics, the environment, population, and life and physical sciences. The products will be more easily accessed through this project as the collection becomes more comprehensive.

    This project is based on proven technologies and techniques that have been developed in the research lab of Dr. Geoffrey Brown, Professor of Computer Science in the School of Informatics and Computing at IU Bloomington, with input from Lou Malcomb, Head, Government Information and the Geosciences Library.  It supports browsing the digital documentation and other files such as data, images, audio, and video in convenient alternative formats, as well as searching the collection metadata and full text via a search engine on the site or through popular web search engines.  Additional access is provided to the collection through IUCAT (Indiana University's online library catalog), the Indiana State Library Catalog, and OCLC WorldCat.

----

IU Bloomington Libraries

           Comments: libgpd@indiana.edu

  			Hosted by the IU Digital Library Program

----

        - Copyright  © 				    
2012
 				The Trustees of  Indiana University
        - Copyright Complaints
        - Libraries Privacy Policy
        - Accessibility Help
Joe Martens Commissioner 

### New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation Office of the Director, 12th Floor 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-7011 Phone: (518) 402-9706 • Fax: (518) 402-9020 Website: www.dec.ny.gov

SENT VIA EMAIL ONLY

Mr. Walter Mugdan ( mugdan.walter@epa.gov ) Director Emergency & Remedial Response Division United States Environmental Protection Agency 290 Broadway, 19 th Fl., E38 New York, New York 10007-1866

RE: Proposed Deletion from the National Priority Listing Hiteman Leather Site Site No. 622007 Village of West Winfield, Herkimer County,

Dear Mr. Mugdan:

The New York State De partment of Environmental Conser vation (Department) has received the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Notice of Intent to Delete the Hiteman Leather Si te (site), EPA ID No. NYD981560915 (NYS ID No. 622007) from the National Priorities List (NPL). During thi s deletion process, in accordance with Section 300.425(e) of the National Contingency Plan, the USEPA must, “consult with the state on proposed deletions from the NPL.” Upon review of the site’s final constr uction and closeout documentation, the Department finds that the remedies are performing as expected and are effective.

The USEPA draft Final Closeout Report docume nts that the remedial actions selected for the site, documented in the Record of Decision and two Explanations of Significant Differences, were implemented by the USEPA and the Department in accordan ce with these decision documents.

Please be informed that this site will remain on the New York State Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites as a Class 4, a sit e that has been remediated and/or closed, but requires continued site management (e.g., maintenance and monitoring). With this understanding, the Department c oncurs with the proposed de letion of the Hiteman Leather Superfund site from the National Priorities List.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael Ryan at (518) 402-9662.

Sincerely,

Dale A. Desnoyers, Director Division of Environmental Remediation Septem b er 21, 2011Attachment

ec: J. Singerman, USEPA ( singerman.joel@epa.gov ) T. Mongelli, USEPA ( mongelli.thomas@epa.gov ) G. Rys, NYSDOH ( gar02@health.state.ny.us ) R. Fedigan, NYSDOH ( rjf01@health.state.ny.us ) S. Bates, NYSDOH ( smb02@health.state.ny.us ) ) K. Anders, NYSDOH ( kma06@health.state.ny.us ) R. Schick M. Ryan D. Crosby S. Edwards K. Lewandowski K. Becker
Exhibit 35.2



Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.



I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of
Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:



A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the
period from March 10, 2021 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2021 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation
AB) through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale
and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 10, 2021 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner
Trust 2021 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled
all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | Deere Credit Services, Inc.               
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                           
|                       |     |                                           
|                       | By: | /s/ Steven N. Owenson                     
|                       |     | Steven N. Owenson                         
|                       |     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director
Editorial Note on Part 1102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 83 FR 43739, Aug. 28, 2018.

§ 1102.100 Authority, purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart is issued under the Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896; 12 U.S.C. 552a, as amended.
( b ) The Privacy Act of 1974 is based, in part, on the finding by Congress that “in order to protect the privacy of individuals identified in information systems maintained by Federal agencies, it is necessary and proper for the Congress to regulate the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of information by such agencies.” To achieve this objective, the Act generally provides that Federal agencies must advise an individual upon request whether records maintained by the agency in a system of records pertain to the individual and must grant the individual access to such records. The Act further provides that individuals may request amendments to records pertaining to them that are maintained by the agency, and that the agency shall either grant the requested amendments or set forth fully its reasons for refusing to do so.
( c ) The Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (ASC), pursuant to subsection (f) of the Privacy Act, adopts the following rules and procedures to implement the provisions of the Act summarized above and other provisions of the Act. These rules and procedures are applicable to all requests for information and access or amendment to records pertaining to an individual that are contained in any system of records that is maintained by the ASC.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 30, 2019

t1023 

# Order

Clerk October 30, 2019

159679

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159679

COA: 343245

Saginaw CC: 16

- 042689

- FH

CARL JOSEPH WARDELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Apri l 9, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.