alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• .,:J:=:t>-. Br1dgecrest'  1720 W. Rio Salado Parkway -Tempe, AZ.- 85281 (602) 852-66001  Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the "Servicer''), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021- N3 Servicing Agreement dated as of September 9, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust  2021-N3, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2022.  By:-----------­ Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

*Date/Time:*                         Thursday, October 13, 2009. 9:15 a.m.-3:15 p.m.                    

*Location:*                         1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.                    

*Status:*                         Open Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.                    

*Agenda:*                         October 13, 2009 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One Hundred Thirty-Fourth Meeting (July 23-24, 2009) of the Board of Directors; Chairmans Report; Presidents Report; Finalizing the strategic plan; Selection of National Peace Essay contest topics; Updates on Afghanistan/Pakistan, Sudan and Prevention Work; Other General Issues.                    

*Contact:*                         Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.                    

Dated: September 25, 2009.

Michael B. Graham,

Vice President for Management, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. E9-23599 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
§ 1005.7 Initial disclosures. ( a ) *Timing of disclosures.* A financial institution shall make the disclosures required by this section at the time a consumer contracts for an electronic fund transfer service or before the first electronic fund transfer is made involving the consumer's account.
( b ) *Content of disclosures.* A financial institution shall provide the following disclosures, as applicable: ( 1 ) *Liability of consumer.* A summary of the consumer's liability, under § 1005.6 or under state or other applicable law or agreement, for unauthorized electronic fund transfers.
( 2 ) *Telephone number and address.* The telephone number and address of the person or office to be notified when the consumer believes that an unauthorized electronic fund transfer has been or may be made.
( 3 ) *Business days.* The financial institution's business days.
( 4 ) *Types of transfers; limitations.* The type of electronic fund transfers that the consumer may make and any limitations on the frequency and dollar amount of transfers. Details of the limitations need not be disclosed if confidentiality is essential to maintain the security of the electronic fund transfer system.
( 5 ) *Fees.* Any fees imposed by the financial institution for electronic fund transfers or for the right to make transfers.
( 6 ) *Documentation.* A summary of the consumer's right to receipts and periodic statements, as provided in § 1005.9 of this part, and notices regarding preauthorized transfers as provided in § 1005.10(a) and (d).
( 7 ) *Stop payment.* A summary of the consumer's right to stop payment of a preauthorized electronic fund transfer and the procedure for placing a stop-payment order, as provided in § 1005.10(c).
( 8 ) *Liability of institution.* A summary of the financial institution's liability to the consumer under section 910 of the Act for failure to make or to stop certain transfers.
( 9 ) *Confidentiality.* The circumstances under which, in the ordinary course of business, the financial institution may provide information concerning the consumer's account to third parties.
( 10 ) *Error resolution.* A notice that is substantially similar to Model Form A-3 as set out in appendix A of this part concerning error resolution.
( 11 ) *ATM fees.* A notice that a fee may be imposed by an automated teller machine operator as defined in § 1005.16(a), when the consumer initiates an electronic fund transfer or makes a balance inquiry, and by any network used to complete the transaction.
( c ) *Addition of electronic fund transfer services.* If an electronic fund transfer service is added to a consumer's account and is subject to terms and conditions different from those described in the initial disclosures, disclosures for the new service are required.
[76 FR 81023, Dec. 27, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 70320, Oct. 12, 2016]
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silverado Gold Mines
Ltd;

1.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

2.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

3.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Issuers fiscal quarter ending
September 30, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditor and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: April 13, 2006

/s/ Garry L. AnselmoGarry
L. Anselmo Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### Elsie R. Coale, Respondent, *v.*Daniel H. Bennett et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor on the verdict of the jury and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

J. Woolsey Shepard, for appellants.

Rudolph Loreck, for respondent.

Scotchman, J.

This action is brought to recover $200.85 against all of the defendants for alleged professional services rendered as stenographer, and for adjournments upon a reference. The only question in dispute is the alleged services for adjournments. The charge made for stenographer’s fees and transcribing minutes of the testimony has not been questioned. There was no agreement in writing or stipulation, it is admitted, as to the payment of fees for adjournments. The proofs at the trial show that one-half of the claim set up in the complaint was paid by other parties interested, and that only one-half, namely, $100.43, is claimed in this action against the present defendants. There being no agreement, the plaintiff sought to establish her ■claim as to adjournments by attempting to prove a custom; that it was *her*usual custom to charge for such adjournments at the rate of $5 each. All questions in relation to this custom were obected and the allowance thereof excepted to and repeated motions were made to strike out the answers given, and the denial thereof excepted to. To establish a custom, it must be shown that it is general, uniform and known. This, the evidence in this case fails to show. What the plaintiff charged for adjournments during thirteen years past is not competent to establish a custom. There being no evidence competent to establish a custom, the trial justice erred in submitting the case to the jury on the question of custom.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed and new trial ■ordered, with costs and disbursements to the appellants to abide the event.

Eitzsimons, Oh. J., concurs.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
# Official Journal C 140A/21 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 140A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5921 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 140A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5921 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2016/C 140A/1 | Recruitment notice PE/190/S | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2016/C 140A/1

Recruitment notice PE/190/S

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-727.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and VIETNAM 

Signed at Washington June 22, 2005 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 VIETNAM 

 Economic and Technical Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington June 22, 2005; 

 Entered into force July 27, 2005.
# Official Journal C 176/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.176.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 176 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5519 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.176.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 176

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5519 June 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 176/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 176/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 38.760 Payments under the grant. ( a ) Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and manner set forth in the NOFA.
( b ) *Availability of grant funds.* Federal financial assistance will become available subsequent to the effective date of the grant as set forth in the grant agreement. Recipients may be reimbursed for costs resulting from obligations incurred before the effective date of the grant, if such costs are authorized by VA in the NOFA or the grant agreement or authorized subsequently by VA in writing, and otherwise would be allowable as costs of the grant under applicable guidelines, regulations, and terms and conditions of the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
----

            COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/587/CFSP

of 28 July 2005         

extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Marc OTTE as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East peace process as set out in Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP is hereby extended until 28 February 2006.

Article 2

Article 5(1) of Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR shall be EUR 560 000.’

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW            

----

(1)OJ L 326, 13.12.2003, p. 46.

(2)OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 73.

----
§ 1081.104 Authority of the hearing officer. ( a ) *General rule.* The hearing officer will have all powers necessary to conduct a proceeding in a fair and impartial manner and to avoid unnecessary delay. No provision of this part may be construed to limit the powers of the hearing officers provided by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 556, 557.
( b ) *Powers.* The powers of the hearing officer include but are not limited to the power: ( 1 ) To administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) To issue subpoenas, subpoenas *duces tecum,* and protective orders, as authorized by this part, and to quash or modify any such subpoenas or orders;
( 3 ) To take depositions or cause depositions to be taken;
( 4 ) To receive relevant evidence and to rule upon the admission of evidence and offers of proof;
( 5 ) To regulate the course of a proceeding and the conduct of parties and their counsel;
( 6 ) To reject written submissions that materially fail to comply with the requirements of this part, and to deny confidential status to documents and testimony without prejudice until a party complies with all relevant rules of this chapter;
( 7 ) To hold conferences for settlement, simplification of the issues, or any other proper purpose and require the attendance at any such conference of at least one representative of each party who has authority to negotiate concerning the resolution of issues in controversy;
( 8 ) To inform the parties as to the availability of one or more alternative means of dispute resolution, and to encourage the use of such methods;
( 9 ) To certify questions to the Director for the Director's determination in accordance with the rules of this part;
( 10 ) To consider and rule upon, as justice may require, all procedural and other motions appropriate in adjudication proceedings;
( 11 ) To issue and file preliminary findings and conclusions;
( 12 ) To recuse oneself by motion made by a party or on the hearing officer's own motion;
( 13 ) To issue such sanctions against parties or their counsel as may be necessary to deter repetition of sanctionable conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated, as provided for in this part or as otherwise necessary to the appropriate conduct of hearings and related proceedings, provided that no sanction will be imposed before providing the sanctioned person an opportunity to show cause why no such sanction should issue; and
( 14 ) To do all other things necessary and appropriate to discharge the duties of a presiding officer.
**
**Exhibit 33.6**

**Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria**

1. Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC (the “Depositor”), as depositor, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2021, and for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all asset-backed securities transactions for which theDepositor acted as depositor involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platformare set forth in Appendix A hereto. 

2. The Depositor used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB toassess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All otherservicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the Depositor based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 

4. The Depositor has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2021 and for the Reporting Period withrespect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report onthe Depositor’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2021 and for the Reporting Period. 

March 25, 2022 

 
Carvana Receivables Depositor, LLCBy: 
/s/ Mike McKeever
Name: Mike McKeeverTitle: President (senior officer in charge of securitization)**

Appendix A 

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4

 
2
41870.

#### NELSON v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced to 12 months for possessing nontax-paid liquor.

1. The trial court did not err in charging the jury the law of confession. The defendant cites cases in which it was held that a charge on the subject of confession was unauthorized, because while the statement of the defendant admitted inculpatory facts or admitted a homicide, or admitted the defendant’s presence when a homicide was committed, it also related circumstances of excuse or justification, and was not an acknowledgment of guilt of the offense charged. See *Dumas v. State,*63 Ga, 600; *Covington v. State,*79 Ga. 687 (7 SE 153); *Pressley v. Stale,*201 Ga. 267 (39 SE2d 478); *Green v. State,*210 Ga. 745 (82 SE2d 703).

There was evidence in this case that the defendant stated to the investigating officer that a case of wine found in the house where the defendant was, was hers and that the two pints of liquor found in the case of wine were hers, too. The defendant herself testified under oath that when the officer repeated the question to her whether the whiskey was hers, she said “Yes, sir.” The defendant’s statement in evidence did not include any circumstances of excuse or justification that would prevent it being an acknowledgment of guilt of the offense charged.

2. The trial court did not err in failing to charge the jury that there is a legal presumption that all household effects, including any intoxicating liquors found in the house, belong to the head of the household. Such presumption has been • applied when liquor was found in the house of the defendant's husband where the defendant lived with him. *Jenkins v. State,*51 Ga. App. 95 (179 SE 597). In the present case the defendant was the mother-in-law of the owner of the house where the liquor was found and did not live there, and we need not decide whether the presumption would apply. In any event, while it is error in a criminal case to fail to *361charge on the presumption of innocence with which the accused enters upon his trial *(Kelly v. State,*204 Ga. 239 (49 SE2d 489)), we find no authority requiring the court to charge without request on the presumption the defendant contends should have been charged in this case. Of. *Anderson v. State,*196 Ga. 468, 469 (26 SE2d 755). See Greene, Georgia Law of Evidence 89, 93, §§ 23, 25.

Argued March 8, 1966

Decided March 18, 1966.

*Johnson & Johnson, W. P. Johnson, B. J. Brown,*for appellant.

*Wright Lipford, Solicitor General,*for appellee.

3. Though there was testimony contradicting the evidence that the defendant possessed nontax-paid liquor, there were circumstances and testimony of the defendant herself that corroborated the defendant’s confession. The evidence authorized the conviction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*