# Official Journal C 228/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.228.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 228 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 567 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.228.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 228

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 567 August 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 228/01 | Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin products | 1 |
| 2013/C 228/02 | Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for pigmeat products | 2 |
| 2013/C 228/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6813 — McCain Foods Group/Lutosa Business) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2013/C 228/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6986 — Bain Capital/Maisons du Monde) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 228/01

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin products

1

2013/C 228/02

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for pigmeat products

2

2013/C 228/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6813 — McCain Foods Group/Lutosa Business) (
  1
  )

1

3

2013/C 228/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6986 — Bain Capital/Maisons du Monde) (
  1
  )

1

3

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2013/C 228/05 | Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (2013/I) | 4 |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 228/06 | Euro exchange rates | 27 |
| 2013/C 228/07 | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 | 28 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2013/C 228/05

Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (2013/I)

4

European Commission

2013/C 228/06

Euro exchange rates

27

2013/C 228/07

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

28

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 228/08 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 30 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2013/C 228/08

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

30

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/1

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin products

2013/C 228/01

Commission Regulations (EC) No 533/2007 (1), (EC) No 536/2007 (2), (EC) No 539/2007 (3), (EC) No 1384/2007 (4) and (EC) No 1385/2007 (5) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2013 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2013 are, for quotas 09.4068, 09.4070, 09.4169, 09.4015, 09.4401, 09.4402, 09.4091, 09.4092 and 09.4421, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (6), the quantities not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2013; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.

(2)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

(3)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 19.

(4)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

(5)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

(6)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4068 | 1 768 000 |
| 09.4070 | 445 250 |
| 09.4169 | 5 311 250 |
| 09.4015 | 27 000 000 |
| 09.4401 | 120 760 |
| 09.4402 | 3 011 588 |
| 09.4091 | 420 000 |
| 09.4092 | 482 500 |
| 09.4421 | 525 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013

(in kg)

09.4068

1 768 000

09.4070

445 250

09.4169

5 311 250

09.4015

27 000 000

09.4401

120 760

09.4402

3 011 588

09.4091

420 000

09.4092

482 500

09.4421

525 000

---

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for pigmeat products

2013/C 228/02

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2013 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2013 are, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2013; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 8 536 250 |
| 09.4170 | 1 230 500 |
| 09.4204 | 1 156 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013

(in kg)

09.4038

8 536 250

09.4170

1 230 500

09.4204

1 156 000

---

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6813 — McCain Foods Group/Lutosa Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 228/03

On 28 May 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6813. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6813. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6986 — Bain Capital/Maisons du Monde)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 228/04

On 31 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/4

---

Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (2013/I)

2013/C 228/05

Introduction

In line with the EU Strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction adopted by the European Council in December 2003 (doc. 15708/03), progress reports on the implementation of the Strategy are foreseen every six months. This progress report covers activities carried out in the first half of 2013.

The guiding principles of the EU in the field continue to be:

| (i) | the overall aim of effective multilateralism, including the promotion of the universality of international treaties, conventions and other instruments and their national implementation, in accordance with the objectives of the European Security Strategy, the EU WMD Non-proliferation strategy and the New lines for action (doc. 17172/08); |
| --- | --- |

(i)

the overall aim of effective multilateralism, including the promotion of the universality of international treaties, conventions and other instruments and their national implementation, in accordance with the objectives of the European Security Strategy, the EU WMD Non-proliferation strategy and the New lines for action (doc. 17172/08);

| (ii) | close cooperation with partners and other third countries striving towards a global convergence of views on the need to strengthen the international non-proliferation regime — efforts have continued to address non-proliferation issues in the EU's bilateral relations with all relevant countries, in particular through political dialogue meetings and more informal contacts; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

close cooperation with partners and other third countries striving towards a global convergence of views on the need to strengthen the international non-proliferation regime — efforts have continued to address non-proliferation issues in the EU's bilateral relations with all relevant countries, in particular through political dialogue meetings and more informal contacts;

| (iii) | effective and complementary use of all available instruments and financial resources (CFSP budget, Instrument for Stability, other instruments) in order to maximise the impact of its activities in pursuit of the EU Foreign Policy objectives. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

effective and complementary use of all available instruments and financial resources (CFSP budget, Instrument for Stability, other instruments) in order to maximise the impact of its activities in pursuit of the EU Foreign Policy objectives.

On 9 November 2012, the High Representative, Catherine Ashton, announced the nomintion of Jacek Bylica as Principal Advisor and Special Envoy for Non-proliferation and Disarmament, The Special Envoy took up function on 18 February 2013 and already represented the EU in a number of key international meetings (notably the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Preparatory Committee, the Chemical Weapons Convention Review Conference, the Proliferation Security Initiative High-Level Meeting, the Open-ended Consultations on the draft International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities).

In the first months of his mandate, the Special Envoy focused the following.

| — | Enhancing efforts to uphold the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which remains for the EU a top priority, given also its direct relevance for regional proliferation major challenges in Iran and DPRK. This year's NPT PrepCom was held in the shadow of the fact that a Conference on the establishment in the Middle East of a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction was not convened in 2012, as envisioned in the documents of the 2010 Review Conference. As for the EU, the efforts of the Finnish Facilitator to that effect were supported, also through the organisation, with the assistance of the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium, of informal seminars facilitating dialogue among relevant parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

Enhancing efforts to uphold the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which remains for the EU a top priority, given also its direct relevance for regional proliferation major challenges in Iran and DPRK. This year's NPT PrepCom was held in the shadow of the fact that a Conference on the establishment in the Middle East of a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction was not convened in 2012, as envisioned in the documents of the 2010 Review Conference. As for the EU, the efforts of the Finnish Facilitator to that effect were supported, also through the organisation, with the assistance of the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium, of informal seminars facilitating dialogue among relevant parties.

| — | Taking forward the initiative to launch, on behalf of the international community, a Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities. The Special Envoy engaged in numerous bilateral outreach meetings with key partners and briefed the UN Group of Governmental Experts on TCBMs in Outer Space (Geneva, 2 April 2013). On 16 and 17 May 2013, in Kiev, he chaired the first round of Open-ended consultations on the draft Code, bringing together around 140 representatives from 61 countries. |
| --- | --- |

—

Taking forward the initiative to launch, on behalf of the international community, a Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities. The Special Envoy engaged in numerous bilateral outreach meetings with key partners and briefed the UN Group of Governmental Experts on TCBMs in Outer Space (Geneva, 2 April 2013). On 16 and 17 May 2013, in Kiev, he chaired the first round of Open-ended consultations on the draft Code, bringing together around 140 representatives from 61 countries.

| — | Intensifying/initiating non-proliferation dialogues with major partners outside of the EU. The EU has continued close cooperation with partners and other third countries striving towards a global convergence of views on the need to strengthen the international non-proliferation regime. Efforts have continued to address non-proliferation issues in the EU's bilateral relations with all relevant countries, in particular through political dialogue meetings and more informal contacts. |
| --- | --- |

—

Intensifying/initiating non-proliferation dialogues with major partners outside of the EU. The EU has continued close cooperation with partners and other third countries striving towards a global convergence of views on the need to strengthen the international non-proliferation regime. Efforts have continued to address non-proliferation issues in the EU's bilateral relations with all relevant countries, in particular through political dialogue meetings and more informal contacts.

The EU has continued to work for the effective and complementary use of all available instruments and financial resources (CFSP budget, Instrument for Stability, other instruments) in order to maximise the impact of its activities in supporting international organisations and third countries.

1.   NUCLEAR ISSUES

The Non-Proliferation Working Group (CONOP) contributed actively to preparations of EU positions for the IAEA Board of Governors meetings in March and June 2013. It discussed and prepared the EU contributions to the NPT Preparatory Committee (April–May 2013), the GICNT expert-level meetings and Plenary, the NSG Consultative Group meeting and Plenary, the CTBTO working group and Preparatory Commission meetings, as well as other relevant meetings in the nuclear field. It pursued the implementation of the New Lines of Action by the EU in combating the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems through discussion of various actions envisaged in this field, inter alia, on consular vigilance, and prepared Council guidance to ensure that work would continue in the areas in which progress is still needed.

1.1.   Follow up to the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference

The EU actively participated in the NPT Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) meeting organised in Geneva from 22 April to 3 May 2013, and reported on its activities with regard to the implementation of the Action Plan adopted at the 2010 NPT Review Conference, including the understandings reached on the Middle East. The meeting was successfully chaired by Ambassador Cornel Feruta, Political Director in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania. The EU contributed to the debate with one General Statement and three Cluster Statements, and made two interventions in the thematic debates on the Middle East and Article X/withdrawal. It presented a Working Paper on ‘Priority issues for discussion and progress with regard to the implementation of the NPT 2010 Review Conference conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions (2010 Action Plan)’ and organised a well-attended side event on ‘Regional Nuclear Material accountancy and Control mechanisms, the European model (EURATOM)’. The Chair's Summary reflects EU positions and puts high emphasis on non-compliance in relation to the DPRK, Iran and Syria, an EU priority. As anticipated, the issue of the Conference on a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone in the Middle East very much dominated the proceeding of the whole session. The EU voiced its strong support to the Facilitator for this Conference and expressed its hope that it will be convened as soon as possible this year.

1.2.   International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

The EU has enhanced its support to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna. The EU remains a key donor to the Nuclear Security Fund, with more than EUR 31 million committed since 2004. Work has started on sustaining the EU contribution. Further, on nuclear security, the EU has contributed with its technical expertise to training activities and workshops organised by IAEA and targeting third countries to enhance capabilities in combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and other radioactive materials. The EU and the IAEA have continued to coordinate their support to third countries in this field. A first-ever EU-IAEA Annual Senior Officials Meeting (SOM), involving the EEAS, the European Commission/Euratom and IAEA representatives at senior level, was held on 25 January 2013 in Brussels to enhance cooperation in other areas of the IAEA activity, increase visibility of EU contributions and further coordinate action in particular in the field of Nuclear Security, in order to ensure complementarity and avoid overlap between activities undertaken by the EU CBRN Centres of Excellence and the IAEA, and take benefit from such complementarity (to these effect, EU and IAEA had also agreed on Practical Arrangements to guide their cooperation).

The EU has committed since 2008 by Council Conclusions to contribute up to EUR 25 million to the IAEA LEU (Low Enriched Uranium) Bank. The EU contributed EUR 20 million from the Instrument for Stability to support the Bank. Another contribution is to be provided from the CFSP budget, based on a Council Decision. The Council's approval will depend on progress made between the IAEA and the Host Country for the Bank, Kazakhstan.

Furthermore, the European Commission's Nuclear Safeguards Directorate continues to apply safeguards on all civil nuclear material in all 27 EU Member States. The European Commission implements this task in close cooperation with the IAEA. To do so, it disposes of an annual budget of approximately EUR 20 million.

In the current economic situation, the IAEA and the Commission envisage enhancing their cooperation in the field of nuclear material safeguards with the aim to optimise the use of human and financial resources, while maintaining the effectiveness of safeguards.

The EU has also committed EUR 5 million to support an international project aiming at expanding and modernising the Seibersdorf Safeguards laboratory in Austria (with EUR 4,75 million already paid in December 2011). An additional contribution of EUR 5 million was committed (of which an amount of 4,75 million has been paid in December 2012).

The EU has continued to provide important technical support to the IAEA in the field of nuclear safeguards through the European Commission Cooperative Support Programme. The EU has used its various instruments to enable safe and secure implementation of peaceful uses of nuclear technology in third countries, including through the IAEA, and is working on further projects together with the IAEA.

At expert level, the European Commission in cooperation with the IAEA has launched a process to assess the IAEA's Illicit Trafficking Database (ITDB) with regard to its response to user needs. The results of the Commission-funded project will be available in 2013.

EU funds provided to IAEA under Joint Actions from I to IV, and Council Decision V helped to advance the IAEA's efforts by raising awareness and improving understanding of nuclear security and its many component parts. Priority was given to those States that needed to determine the radioactive and nuclear material they had, the means to control it and the ways to reduce the risks it posed. Efforts focused on specific areas, strengthening States' legislative and regulatory infrastructure related to nuclear and other radioactive material to enable the country to fulfil its national and international obligations, nuclear security measures for nuclear and other radioactive material in use, storage and transport and their related facilities, States' capabilities for dealing with nuclear and radioactive material out of control of national regulatory control. EU funds were appropriated in response to a growing need for tighter control of nuclear and radioactive material and a better understanding of how to implement policies and procedures to ensure that effective nuclear security measures are in place. An additional region was added to each Joint Action, with Central Asia, South-Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East and South-East Asia being covered by EU Joint Action IV in 2008. EU Council Decision V expanded the reach of the programme to States in the Gulf, South America, the Caribbean and Middle America regions, with 126 States eligible for support worldwide.

1.3.   Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)

The EU has actively promoted the early entry into force of the Comprehensive-Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), based on the relevant Council Decisions (1) in support of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) and by conducting outreach efforts towards all countries that have not yet signed or ratified the CTBT, including the remaining Annex 2 States whose ratification is required for the entry into force of the Treaty. Based on its updated internal guidelines supporting the entry into force of the CTBT, the EU will continue to raise awareness of the CTBT in various contexts, including in political dialogue meetings, in order to create further momentum for the ratification of the Treaty.

The nuclear test conducted by the DPRK on 12 February 2013 has clearly shown the real importance of the CTBTO Detection Stations Network, which is one of the projects that the EU is supporting through its Council Decisions. CTBTO teams have been mobilised for providing all countries that signed the CTBT with relevant hot-line data for feeding decision-makers. The nuclear test has also shown the importance of conducting exercises such as the Integrated Field Exercise to be organised in 2014 in Jordan to test and improve real detection systems. The efforts of the maintenance of the 321 seismic auxiliary stations assisted through Joint Actions from I to V, and the implementation of the CTBTO International Data Centre which collects, analyses and distributes data coming from the stations network will contribute to the necessary sustainability of the system.

1.4.   Regional issues (Iran, DPRK)

The EU has remained fully committed to the ongoing efforts aimed at achieving a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear issue through negotiations, based on the NPT and the full implementation of all relevant UNSC and IAEA Board of Governors Resolutions. The EU has urged Iran to take concrete and practical steps aimed at building confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear programme, and to comply with all its international obligations in order to address the serious concerns of the International Community. During two rounds of talks held in February and April in 2013 in Almaty, the EU High Representative, together with the E3 + 3, has continued her efforts to engage Iran into discussions on the substance of a concrete proposal for an initial confidence-building step. In addition, an E3/EU + 3 technical experts meeting with Iran took place in March 2013 in Istanbul, aimed at providing further technical details on the confidence-building proposal put forward to Iran during the first Almaty meeting. Iran has so far failed to demonstrate a clear commitment to agree on a meaningful confidence-building step, based on the Almaty confidence-building proposal which would address the most urgent concerns regarding its nuclear programme. Iran's ongoing expansion of its sensitive nuclear activities, as reported by the IAEA, further increases international concerns. Moreover, serious concern persists that due to lack of sufficient Iranian cooperation for more than one and a half years, no progress was made in the IAEA efforts to resolve outstanding issues, including those related to possible military dimensions to the Iranian nuclear programme, and no agreement was reached on a ‘structured approach’ which should outline how to proceed with the clarification of those issues. Iran thereby continues to defy the requirements contained in the IAEA Board of Governors resolution adopted on 13 September 2012 with overwhelming majority.

Regarding the DPRK, the EU has continued to urge the DPRK to abide by its obligations assumed under the relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, including by abandoning all its existing nuclear and ballistic missile programs in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner. It strongly condemned the nuclear test conducted by the DPRK on 12 February 2013, which was an outright violation of its international obligations under the UN Security Council Resolutions 1718, 1874 and 2087, and resulted in the adoption of UNSCR 2094. The EU has continued to call on the DPRK to return to full compliance with the NPT and IAEA safeguards obligations, and provide the IAEA with the requested access to individuals, documentation, equipment and facilities. The EU has constantly been supportive of the resumption of the Six-Party Talks process, and has called for DPRK to return to credible and authentic international negotiations. In addition to implementing UN Security Council resolutions, the EU has also introduced additional autonomous restrictive measures, including strengthened controls on dual use goods and the proliferation of conventional arms. The EU renewed its appeal to the DPRK urging it to ratify the CTBT and to refrain from any further provocative acts.

2.   CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT (CD)/TREATY BANNING THE PRODUCTION OF FISSILE MATERIAL FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS OR OTHER NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE DEVICES

For the EU, the immediate commencement and early conclusion of the negotiation in the Conference on Disarmament (CD) of a Treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices on the basis of document CD/1299 and the mandate contained therein remains a clear priority. Such a treaty constitutes an urgent necessity in the nuclear disarmament field as a complement to the NPT and the CTBT.

National security concerns, while legitimate, can and should be addressed as part of the negotiation process rather than as a prerequisite. Confidence-building measures could be taken immediately, without the need to wait for the commencement of formal negotiations. In this regard, pending negotiations and the entry into force of the treaty, the European Union calls on all States concerned to declare and uphold an immediate moratorium on the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

The EU reaffirms its commitment to engage in substantive discussions on all the other core issues included in CD/1864: on practical steps for progressive and systematic efforts to reduce nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of their elimination, including on approaches toward potential future work of a multilateral character; on all issues related to the prevention of an arms race in outer space and on effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear weapon states against the use or the threat of use of nuclear weapons, as well as on other issues.

The EU reiterates the longstanding commitment of its Member States to the enlargement of the CD and looks forward to enhanced interaction between civil society and the CD.

The EU is deeply concerned by the continued dysfunction of a crucial part of the disarmament machinery: the ongoing stalemate in the CD. The EU remains strongly committed to the CD as the single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum of the international community. The EU is ready to engage constructively with all partners to put the CD back on track and start substantial work, in accordance with the mandate by the UN General Assembly.

3.   CHEMICAL WEAPONS

The EU played an active role in the Third Review Conference of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) which took place 8–19 April in The Hague. An EU statement was delivered and through active coordination among the EU delegations on the ground chaired by Ireland the EU objectives were promoted. The Review Conference was able to adopt by consensus a report which includes a number of issues which are priorities for EU (2), notably (i) completing the destruction of existing stockpiles; (ii) promoting universality of the CWC (eight states not yet parties); (iii) shifting to non-proliferation efforts; (iv) promoting capacity-building with regard to safety and security in the chemical industry in developing countries, in accordance with Article XI, and responding to the use of chemical weapons, under Article X. However, a number of EU and WEOG countries also expressed disappointment that the Review Conference was not able to adopt stronger language on Syria and on national implementation.

The EU also organised a successful side event on the cooperation with OPCW and the way forward.

In terms of implementation of the EU support, all countries which had been selected to receive grants utilised these to fill critical technical gaps, allowing these States Parties to make significant progress towards national implementation of the CWC. Additionally, as the only source of funding for this form of activity was from the EU, the Joint Actions/Council Decisions remain the only possible means of providing grants to tackle implementation shortcomings. From the 90 national implementation sub-projects carried out by the Technical Secretariat, about half could not have been performed without Joint Actions/Council Decisions funds.

As universality is concerned, in March 2013, Ideas and practical steps on EU action for promoting the universality and the national implementation of the CWC were adopted, which form the basis for work in this area in the coming period. In this respect, the EU démarches to the Governments of Angola, Egypt, Israel, Myanmar, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Somalia and South Sudan were conducted requesting those seven countries to adhere as soon as possible to the CWC. On 29 May 2013, Somalia deposited its instrument of accession to the CWC with the UN Secretary-General. Thirty days after, the Convention entered into force for Somalia and thus the country became the 189th State Party to the CWC.

Nineteen countries have joined the Convention since the first Joint Action was adopted and half of the countries that joined the Convention in 2005 (four out of eight) had been involved in a JA/CD-funded outreach activity, this was the case for all countries who joined during the following years.

4.   BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS

Following the Seventh BTWC Review Conference (Geneva, December 2011), the EU has engaged constructively in the intersessional process contributing with statements and specific working papers on: (i) international cooperation and assistance; (ii) strengthening of national implementation; (iii) capacity-building in bio-safety and bio-security. Further to the side event on the promotion of the Council Decision 2012/421/CFSP, which took place in the margins of the meeting of the States Parties held in December 2012, the Implementation Support Unit of the BTWC organised a workshop in June 2013, in Geneva, for EU experts assisting beneficiary countries with the objective of discussing best practices and appropriate preparations for assistance activities.

In terms of general output from EU support, it has made possible bringing together national and regional stakeholders through workshops, assistance visits, submission of initial CBMs by several States Parties, development of guide materials, embarkation on communication with some States not yet parties and others. The knowledge and awareness among professionals from the targeted States on the BTWC and its process was improved considerably as seen from the very positive feedback expressed by the participants in workshops. Moreover, the regional approach was highly appreciated as it laid the ground for enhanced regional networking and interactions with regional organisations. Regional organisations were actively involved in workshops and have shown an interest in future cooperation in future activities. The assistance visits successfully reached their goals, whether the visits were focused on awareness-raising among national stakeholders, building national networks or were focused on more specific aspects of national implementation such as legislation or CBM submissions.

The aims of the EU action included increased adherence to the BTWC in all geographic regions; an enhanced understanding of the BTWC among relevant national authorities and/or strengthened sub-regional networking in order to promote accession to the BTWC; and promotion of voluntary implementation of the BTWC prior to ratification/accession. The number of countries, which have consented to be bound by the Convention and its obligations, has increased. During the period 2009 to 2013, four States joined the Convention. Communication channels have been established with several other non-members in Asia, Africa and Latin America, which has laid a foundation for future activities.

The activities performed under the EU action further aimed to increase the appointment of national points of contact for CBM submissions, create or enhance national mechanisms for preparing and compiling information needed for CBM submissions, increase regular submissions of CBMs and improve technical/electronic tools for CBM submissions and security and maintenance of the CBM website. During the full implementation period of the EU action, 2009–11, 10 States Parties submitted their first CBMs. Of these, three received assistance for CBM submissions, two hosted EU-supported workshops, and four were sponsored to attend workshops organised under the EU action. The CBM Guidance Brochure produced through the EU support facilitated CBM submissions; the numbers of annual CBM submissions are the highest ever for the years 2010 and 2011.

5.   MISSILES

The EU has strongly supported the Hague Code of Conduct against ballistic missile proliferation (HCoC) since its inception and considers the Code as an important multilateral instrument aimed at curbing the proliferation of ballistic missiles systems and related technologies through transparency and confidence building measures. All EU Member States have subscribed to the Code. The EU has continued to pursue and support the three aspects of the Code: universality, implementation, and enhanced and improved functioning.

Based on the Council Decision 2012/423/CFSP in support to HCoC and missile non-proliferation in general, on 15 January 2013 the EU organised a commemorative conference in Vienna to mark the 10th anniversary of the signing of the HCoC. On 31 May 2013, in the margins of the HCoC Annual Regular Meeting, the EU organised an outreach event in Vienna, in support of the HCoC.

Good efforts were made to ensure EU visibility, including prominent participation of the EU Head of Delegation, clear references to the EU funding, which were echoed by nearly all speakers. Innovation introduced through live-streaming of the event and the discussions on the internet. Regarding the further implementation of the Council Decision, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS) is planning to hold an awareness-building session in Paris in early September, an outreach event in Geneva in late August or early September and another one in New York in mid-October, a regional seminar in Jakarta in late September and another one in Abu Dhabi in mid-December.

6.   CBRN RISK MITIGATION

The EU has continued to progress with regard to the implementation of the EU CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear) Action Plan adopted in 2009 and supported by the Prevention of and Fight against Crime (ISEC) Programme. With the aim of coordinating the implementation of the EU CBRN Action Plan, the Commission is working with Member States through an Advisory Group on CBRN security. In order to maximise synergies between the implementation of the CBRN Action Plan and the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Enhancing the Security of Explosives, common structures are currently being set up.

Work undertaken in the framework of the CBRN Action Plan includes the Nuclear Security Training Centre — EUSECTRA — which was inaugurated on 18 April 2013 (Karlsruhe).

Furthermore, the Commission is engaged in assessing and enhancing detection technology for radioactive materials through the project ITRAP+10, is working on the analysis of existing radioactive dispersal modelling tools, and is considering the development of a virtual reality-based training tool for first responders in the area of radiological security. The Commission is also planning to extend its support to Member States in the laboratory analysis of radioactive materials. In addition, studies are ongoing taking stock of the implementation by EU Member States of the IAEA Code of Conduct on the safety and security of radioactive materials and the state-of-play of radioactive sources outside regulatory control in the EU Member States.

The ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’ (CoE) Initiative, funded through the Instrument for Stability, was launched by the EU in May 2010. EU CBRN Centres of Excellence are being created in response to the recognition of insufficient institutional capacity of several countries to mitigate the CBRN risk: criminal activities (CBRN proliferation or terrorism), natural (zoonosis and epidemics) and accidental disasters (industrial accidents). Their objective is to develop an all-hazard CBRN policy at national and regional level to anticipate and respond to these risks. In short, these are structural measures to reduce the vulnerability of countries to the CBRN events in the reciprocal interest of regions and the EU security.

The way to achieve this objective is to support the creation of regional networks of expertise in the legal, regulatory, technical, control and enforcement matters regarding the CBRN risk mitigation.

Six regional centres are being established in: (i) North Africa (Algiers), (ii) Atlantic Façade (Rabat), (iii) Middle East (Amman), (iv) South East Europe — Southern Caucasus — R. Moldova — Ukraine (Tbilisi), (v) South East Asia (Manila) and (vi) Sub-Saharan Africa (Nairobi), and have started their work. The next step will see the opening of regional Secretariats in Central Asia (Tashkent — tbc) and Gulf Countries (Abu Dhabi). In addition to 33 projects adding up to EUR 26 million previously contracted, new projects amounting to around EUR 10 million are being contracted with different consortia, including from the Member States.

7.   THINK TANKS

Based on the Council Decision 2010/430/CFSP of 26 July 2010, the EU's work under the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction has been actively supported by the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium that started its activity in January 2011. Following the successful activities organised in 2012 (WMDFZ in the Middle East Seminar on 5 and 6 November 2012 and first Annual Meeting entitled ‘EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Conference’ on 3 and 4 February 2012) a new annual international conference on Non Proliferation and Disarmament will be held on 30 September and 1 October 2013 preceded by the EU Second Consultative meeting held on 17 and 18 June 2013. In the meantime, the Consortium stepped up its research activities, in cooperation with other European think tanks in the field, and published working papers relevant to the implementation of the WMD Non-proliferation strategy, available on the Consortium's website (http://www.nonproliferation.eu/). Further contributions to the broader non-proliferation and disarmament discussion will be published.

8.   UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1540 AND EXPORT CONTROLS

(a)   UNSCR 1540

The EU had expressed, by signing a joint declaration with the United States on the margins of the 66th session of the United Nations General Assembly (New York, 19 October 2011), its longstanding commitment towards pursuing the implementation of resolutions 1540 and 1977.

A new Council Decision in support of UNSCR 1540 that focuses on national implementation efforts was endorsed at working group level in February 2012 and will be adopted by the Council at the end of July 2013. It will resource the UNODA to organise regional workshops and country assistance visits.

The EU CBRN Centres of Excellence Initiative contribute together with other EU funds, provided through the CFSP budget, to the objectives of the UNSC Resolution 1540 on the fight against illicit trafficking or criminal use of CBRN materials.

(b)   Export Controls

Various activities supporting export controls have continued. At policy level, the European Commission issued on 17 January 2013 a report (Staff Working Document 2013/7) presenting the conclusions of the wide public consultation launched under the Green Paper on Export controls: ensuring security and competitiveness in a changing world. This report opens the way to a review of the EU Export control regime in 2013, with targeted and sectoral consultations of stakeholders, a dedicated ‘Strategic export control conference’ in June 2013 and the preparation of a Communication outlining the Commission's plans by the end of 2013.

On the regulatory side, discussions continued on the proposed amendment to the EU dual-use Regulation No 428/2009 with a view to expediting the updates of the EU dual-use control lists, with a view to concluding the first reading of the proposal. Export controls implementation was supported by two meetings of the Article 23 Coordination Group, as well as a joint meeting with the European Nuclear Energy Forum (ENEF) in February 2013 focusing on nuclear export and transfer controls. A ‘peer visit’ organised in Dublin in May 2013 brought together experts from Member States and provided a forum for a detailed exchange of views in the context of the export control policy review.

EU coordination took place to promote the agreed EU positions in the relevant meetings of the export control regimes held in the first semester (Nuclear Suppliers Group: Consultative Group in March 2013 and Plenary meeting in June 2013; Wassenaar Arrangement: General Working Group in May 2013; Australia Group: Plenary meeting in June 2013).

The objectives set forth for the regional seminars were successfully met. Active dialogue and interactive discussion were guaranteed. The seminars offered a platform for assessing further need of assistance. EU Member States had a unique opportunity to share experiences and to strengthen the regional approach to the implementation of UNSCR 1540.

Regulatory, border, export and customs control officials were the main target but also sub-regional organisations and agencies were involved where possible.

9.   SPACE

Since 2007, the EU has been promoting the development of an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities. This international and voluntary set of guidelines would strengthen safety, security and predictability of all space activities. Such guidelines should, among other things, limit or minimise harmful interference, collisions or accidents in outer space, as well as the creation of debris.

On 5 June 2012, the EU had introduced to the international community in Vienna a new draft, now also supported by a large number of countries outside Europe, which foresees that the International Code would be applicable to all outer space activities conducted by States or non-governmental entities. As the draft code would be voluntary and open to all States, it would lay down the basic rules to be observed by space faring nations in both civil and military space activities.

Following the meeting on 5 June 2012 in Vienna, the EU remains committed to continue the process of multilateral consultations to refine the draft Code in a transparent and inclusive process.

UN Member States were invited to Open-ended Consultations on the draft text that were held in Kiev on 16 and 17 May 2013, bringing together around 140 representatives from 61 countries. Following the meeting in Kiev, the EU plans to present to the international community an updated draft in the coming months and invite UN Member States to a second round of consultations before the end of 2013.

Under the Council Decision in support of the EU's proposal on the Code, implementing partner UNIDIR has organised regional seminars in South East Asia and Africa, which have served as platform of knowledge building of norms of behaviour in outer space and on the proposal for a Code itself. UNIDIR has also helped with the organisation of the first round of Open-ended consultations in Kiev.

10.   WMD NON-PROLIERATION CLAUSES

The EU continued, in accordance with its WMD Non-proliferation strategy, to mainstream non-proliferation of WMD into its contractual relations with third countries.

Further progress was achieved in the negotiation of WMD non-proliferation clauses in relevant agreements between the EU and third countries, and in particular with Australia, Brunei, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and Thailand.

11.   OTHER MULTILATERAL FORUMS

—   G8

The EU played an active role in several meetings of the Non-proliferation and Disarmament Directors in preparing the G8 Summit Statement on non-proliferation and assisted in carrying out several demarches on the IAEA Additional Protocol and UNSCR 1540 national implementation, in association with the UK presidency.

The Global Partnership (GP), nine years after its creation in 2002, has expanded beyond the G8 to become a platform of coordination and cooperation, counting now 17 additional partners. At the Deauville Summit in May 2011, leaders have agreed to further strengthen biological security, 1540 implementation and nuclear security. The United States in 2012 and the United Kingdom in 2013 took this agenda forward, in particular by creating four new sub-working groups on biological security, chemical security, nuclear security and Centres of Excellence (CoE) under the GP Working Group. Bringing in (other) regional organisations as well as reinforcing regional ownership were important subjects of discussion. The EU Centres of Excellence, which were at the origin of the CoE sub-working group, continued to gain momentum within the G8 and the G8GP, in particular as a tool to facilitate exchange of information regionally and, possibly, avoid duplication among donors.

—   Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT)

The EU, as an observer to the GICNT, has been actively involved — in particular through the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission — in the activities of the GICNT Implementation and Assessment Group (IAG), in all areas discussed (nuclear detection, nuclear forensics and response and mitigation). The EU has actively contributed to the substance of all reference documents of the IAG working groups, and delivered a statement at the GICNT Plenary held in Mexico City on 24 May 2013. Spain, an EU Member State, successfully ended its 3-year mandate as the first GICNT IAG Coordinator.

—   Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)

The EU continues to support the objectives of the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) as embodied first of all in the Interdiction Principles adopted in Paris in September 2003. On 28 and 29 May 2013, the Special Envoy participated in a High-Level Political Meeting in Warsaw on the 10th Anniversary of PSI and delivered remarks on EU's relevance to the achievement of PSI objectives.

12.   POLITICAL DIALOGUE MEETINGS

Political dialogue meetings on non-proliferation and disarmament at working group level were organised with Russia (Moscow, 4 March 2013) and Ukraine (Brussels, 15 May 2013). The newly appointed Principal Advisor and Special Envoy for Non-Proliferation and Disarmament held a number of informal consultations with various actors in the margins of important events, including the ATT Conference held in March 2013 in New York (including Algeria, Brazil, Egypt, India, NATO, Nigeria, Mexico, Pakistan, United States, Venezuela, UNODA, Vietnam, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Peru, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand), the Second NPT PrepCom held in April–May 2013 in Geneva (including Egypt, the League of Arab States, South Africa, Peru), and the Third CWC Review Conference held in April 2013 in The Hague (including the OPCW and the United States).

---

(1)  Council Decisions 2010/461/CFSP of 26 July 2010 and 2012/699/CFSP of 13 November 2012.

(2)  As referred to in Council Decisions 2012/166/CFSP of 23 March and 2012/712/CFSP of 19 November 2012.

---

ANNEX I

ANNEX TO THE SIX-MONTHLY WMD PROGRESS REPORT

Overview of EU Council joint actions and Council decisions in the framework of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD)

| Title | Objective and implementing entity | Budget and duration |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Council Decision 2012/699/CFSP of 13 November 2012 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction | The Union will support four projects, the objectives of which are the following:






  (a) | to provide technical assistance and capacity-building to State Signatories to enable them to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBT verification system; |

Title

Objective and implementing entity

Budget and duration

Council Decision 2012/699/CFSP of 13 November 2012 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The Union will support four projects, the objectives of which are the following:

(a)

to provide technical assistance and capacity-building to State Signatories to enable them to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBT verification system;

| (b) | to develop capacity for future generations of CTBT experts through the Capacity Development Initiative (CDI); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to develop capacity for future generations of CTBT experts through the Capacity Development Initiative (CDI);

| (c) | to enhance the Atmospheric Transport Model (ATM); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to enhance the Atmospheric Transport Model (ATM);

| (d) | to characterise and mitigate radio xenon noble gases; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to characterise and mitigate radio xenon noble gases;

| (e) | to support the Integrated Field Exercise in 2014 (IFE14) through the development of an integrated multispectral array; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to support the Integrated Field Exercise in 2014 (IFE14) through the development of an integrated multispectral array;

| (f) | to improve the sustainment of certified IMS Auxiliary Seismic Stations. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

to improve the sustainment of certified IMS Auxiliary Seismic Stations.

Implementing entity: The Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO

Budget: EUR 5 185 028

Official Journal: L 314, 14.11.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Council Decision 2012/423/CFSP of 23 July 2012 on support of ballistic missile non-proliferation in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and of the Council Common Position 2003/805/CFSP

The objectives are:

| (a) | to support activities in support of the Hague Code of Conduct against ballistic missile proliferation, in particular with the aims of:






  — | promoting the universality of the Code, and in particular the subscription to the Code by all States with ballistic missile capabilities; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

to support activities in support of the Hague Code of Conduct against ballistic missile proliferation, in particular with the aims of:

—

promoting the universality of the Code, and in particular the subscription to the Code by all States with ballistic missile capabilities;

| — | supporting the implementation of the Code; |
| --- | --- |

—

supporting the implementation of the Code;

| — | reinforcing the visibility of the Code, in particular on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of its signature; |
| --- | --- |

—

reinforcing the visibility of the Code, in particular on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of its signature;

| (b) | more generally, to support a range of activities to fight against the proliferation of ballistic missiles, aimed notably at raising awareness of this threat, stepping up efforts to increase the effectiveness of multilateral instruments, building up support to initiatives to address these specific challenges and helping interested countries to reinforce nationally their relevant export control regimes. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

more generally, to support a range of activities to fight against the proliferation of ballistic missiles, aimed notably at raising awareness of this threat, stepping up efforts to increase the effectiveness of multilateral instruments, building up support to initiatives to address these specific challenges and helping interested countries to reinforce nationally their relevant export control regimes.

Implementing entity: Fondation pour le Recherche Stratégique

Budget: EUR 930 000

Official Journal: L 196, 24.7.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

To be closed in 2013

Council Decision 2012/422/CFSP of 23 July 2012 in support of a process leading to the establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East

The objectives are:

| (a) | to support the work of the Facilitator for the 2012 Conference on the establishment of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to support the work of the Facilitator for the 2012 Conference on the establishment of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction;

| (b) | to enhance the visibility of the Union as a global actor and in the region in the field of non-proliferation; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to enhance the visibility of the Union as a global actor and in the region in the field of non-proliferation;

| (c) | to encourage regional political and security-related dialogue within civil societies and governments, and more particularly among experts, officials and academics; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to encourage regional political and security-related dialogue within civil societies and governments, and more particularly among experts, officials and academics;

| (d) | to identify concrete confidence-building measures that could serve as practical steps towards the prospect of a Middle East zone free of WMD and their means of delivery; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to identify concrete confidence-building measures that could serve as practical steps towards the prospect of a Middle East zone free of WMD and their means of delivery;

| (e) | to encourage discussion on the universalization and implementation of relevant international treaties and other instruments to prevent the proliferation of WMD and their delivery systems; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to encourage discussion on the universalization and implementation of relevant international treaties and other instruments to prevent the proliferation of WMD and their delivery systems;

| (f) | to discuss issues related to peaceful uses of nuclear energy and international and regional cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

to discuss issues related to peaceful uses of nuclear energy and international and regional cooperation.

Implementing entity: EU Non-Proliferation Consortium

Budget: EUR 352 000

Official Journal: L 196, 24.7.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

To be closed in 2013

Council Decision 2012/421/CFSP of 23 July 2012 in support of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), in the framework of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The objectives are:

| (a) | promoting the universality of the BTWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promoting the universality of the BTWC;

| (b) | supporting the implementation of the BTWC, including submission of CBMs by the States Parties; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

supporting the implementation of the BTWC, including submission of CBMs by the States Parties;

| (c) | supporting the work of the 2012-15 intersessional programme with a view to strengthening the implementation and effectiveness of the BTWC. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

supporting the work of the 2012-15 intersessional programme with a view to strengthening the implementation and effectiveness of the BTWC.

Implementing entity: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UN ODA)

Budget: EUR 1 700 000

Official Journal: L 196, 24.7.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Council Decision 2012/281/CFSP of 29 May 2012 in the framework of the European Security strategy in support of the Union proposal for an international Code of Conduct on outer-space activities

The objectives are:

| (a) | consultations with States, active or not yet active on space issues to discuss the proposal and to gather their views; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

consultations with States, active or not yet active on space issues to discuss the proposal and to gather their views;

| (b) | gathering expert support for the process of developing an international Code of Conduct for outer-space activities. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

gathering expert support for the process of developing an international Code of Conduct for outer-space activities.

Implementing entity: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)

Budget: EUR 1 490 000

Official Journal: L 140, 30.5.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Council Decision 2012/166/CFSP of 23 March 2012 in support of activities of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

The objectives are:

| (a) | to enhance the capacities of States Parties in fulfilling their obligations under the CWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to enhance the capacities of States Parties in fulfilling their obligations under the CWC;

| (b) | to enhance the preparedness of States Parties to prevent and respond to attacks involving toxic chemicals; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to enhance the preparedness of States Parties to prevent and respond to attacks involving toxic chemicals;

| (c) | to enhance international cooperation in the field of chemical activities; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to enhance international cooperation in the field of chemical activities;

| (d) | to support the ability of the OPCW to adapt to developments in the field of science and technology; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to support the ability of the OPCW to adapt to developments in the field of science and technology;

| (e) | to promote universality by encouraging States not Parties to join the CWC. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to promote universality by encouraging States not Parties to join the CWC.

Implementing entity: The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons

Budget: EUR 2 140 000

Official Journal: L 87, 24.3.2012

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Council Decision 2010/799/CFSP of 13 December 2010 in support of a process of confidence-building leading to the establishment of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery in the Middle East in support of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The objectives are:

| (a) | to encourage regional political and security-related dialogue within civil societies and governments, and more particularly among experts, officials and academics; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to encourage regional political and security-related dialogue within civil societies and governments, and more particularly among experts, officials and academics;

| (b) | to identify confidence-building measures that could serve as practical steps towards the prospect of a Middle East zone free of WMD and their means of delivery; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to identify confidence-building measures that could serve as practical steps towards the prospect of a Middle East zone free of WMD and their means of delivery;

| (c) | to encourage discussion on the universalisation and implementation of relevant international treaties and other instruments to prevent the proliferation of WMD and their delivery systems; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to encourage discussion on the universalisation and implementation of relevant international treaties and other instruments to prevent the proliferation of WMD and their delivery systems;

| (d) | to discuss issues related to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and international and regional cooperation in this regard. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to discuss issues related to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and international and regional cooperation in this regard.

Implementing entity: EU Non-Proliferation Consortium

Budget: EUR 347 700

Official Journal: L 341/27, 23.12.2012

Project closed on 6.5.2013

Council Decision 2010/585/CFSP of 27 September 2010 on support for IAEA activities in the areas of nuclear security and verification and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The objectives are:

| (a) | strengthening national legislative and regulatory infrastructures for the implementation of relevant international instruments in the areas of nuclear security and verification, including comprehensive safeguards agreements and the Additional Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

strengthening national legislative and regulatory infrastructures for the implementation of relevant international instruments in the areas of nuclear security and verification, including comprehensive safeguards agreements and the Additional Protocol;

| (b) | assisting States in strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

assisting States in strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials;

| (c) | strengthening States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking in nuclear and other radioactive materials. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

strengthening States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking in nuclear and other radioactive materials.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Budget: EUR 9 966 000

Official Journal: L 302, 1.10.2010

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Council Decision 2010/430/CFSP of 26 July 2010 establishing a European network of independent non-proliferation think tanks in support of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The objective of this network of independent non-proliferation think tanks is to encourage political and security-related dialogue and the long-term discussion of measures to combat the WMD proliferation and their delivery systems within civil societies, and more particularly among experts, researchers and academics. It will constitute a useful stepping stone for non-proliferation action by the Union and the international community. The Union wishes to support this network as follows:

| (a) | through organising a kick-off meeting and an annual conference with a view to submitting a report and/or recommendations to the representative of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

through organising a kick-off meeting and an annual conference with a view to submitting a report and/or recommendations to the representative of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR);

| (b) | through creating an Internet platform to facilitate contacts and foster research dialogue among the network of non-proliferation think tanks. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

through creating an Internet platform to facilitate contacts and foster research dialogue among the network of non-proliferation think tanks.

Implementing entity: EU Non-Proliferation Consortium

Budget: EUR 2 182 000

Official Journal: L 205, 4.8.2010

Estimated duration of the action: 36 months

Council Decision 2010/461/CFSP of 26 July 2010 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

The objectives are:

| (a) | to improve the operation and sustainability of the auxiliary seismic stations network of the CTBT’s International Monitoring System; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to improve the operation and sustainability of the auxiliary seismic stations network of the CTBT’s International Monitoring System;

| (b) | to improve the CTBT verification system through strengthened cooperation with the scientific community; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to improve the CTBT verification system through strengthened cooperation with the scientific community;

| (c) | to provide technical assistance to States Signatories in Africa and in the Latin American and Caribbean Region so as to enable them to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBT verification system; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to provide technical assistance to States Signatories in Africa and in the Latin American and Caribbean Region so as to enable them to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBT verification system;

| (d) | to develop an OSI noble gas capable detection system. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to develop an OSI noble gas capable detection system.

Implementing entity: The Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO

Budget: EUR 5 280 000

Official Journal: L 219, 20.8.2010

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Council Decision 2009/569/CFSP of 27 July 2009 — OPCW

The objective is to support the universalisation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), and in particular to promote the ratification/accession to the CWC by States not Parties (signatory States as well as non-signatory States) and to support the full implementation of the CWC by the States Parties:

| (a) | to enhance the capacities of States Parties in fulfilling their obligations under the Convention; and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to enhance the capacities of States Parties in fulfilling their obligations under the Convention; and

| (b) | to promote universality. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to promote universality.

Implementing entity: The Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons

Budget: EUR 2 110 000

Official Journal: L 197, 29.7.2009

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Implemented

Council Decision 2008/974/CFSP of 18 December 2008 in support of HCoC

The EU supports three aspects of the Code as follows:

| (a) | universality of the Code; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

universality of the Code;

| (b) | implementation of the Code; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

implementation of the Code;

| (c) | enhancement and improved functioning of the Code. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

enhancement and improved functioning of the Code.

Implementing entity: Fondation pour le Recherche Stratégique

Budget: EUR 1 015 000

Official Journal: L 345, 23.12.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Implemented

To be closed in 2013

Council Joint Action 2008/588/CFSP of 10 November 2008 in support of BTWC

The overall objective is:

| (a) | to support the universalisation of the BTWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to support the universalisation of the BTWC;

| (b) | to enhance the implementation of the BTWC, including the submission of CBM declarations; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to enhance the implementation of the BTWC, including the submission of CBM declarations; and

| (c) | to support the best use of the intersessional process 2007-10 for the preparation of the 2011 Review Conference. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to support the best use of the intersessional process 2007-10 for the preparation of the 2011 Review Conference.

Implementing entity: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) — Geneva

Budget: EUR 1 400 000

Official Journal: L 302, 13.11.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2008/588/CFSP of 15 July 2008 in support of CTBTO

The EU supports the development of capacity of the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO in the area of verification by:

| (a) | noble gas monitoring: radio-xenon measurements and data analysis; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

noble gas monitoring: radio-xenon measurements and data analysis;

| (b) | integrating States Signatories in Africa to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBTO monitoring and verification system. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

integrating States Signatories in Africa to fully participate in and contribute to the implementation of the CTBTO monitoring and verification system.

Implementing entity: The CTBTO Preparatory Commission

Budget: EUR 2 316 000

Official Journal: L 189, 17.7.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Implemented

Closed on 7.3.2013

Council Joint Action 2008/368/CFSP of 14 May 2008 in support of the implementation of UNSCR 1540

The projects in support of the implementation of UNSCR 1540 will take the form of six workshops aiming at enhancing the capacity of officials responsible for managing the export control process in six sub regions (Africa, Central America, Mercosur, the Middle East and Gulf Regions, Pacific Islands and South-East Asia), so that they can at a practical level undertake implementation efforts of UNSCR 1540. The proposed workshops will be specifically tailored for border, customs and regulatory officials and will comprise the main elements of an export control process including applicable laws (including national and international legal aspects), regulatory controls (including licensing provisions, end-user verification and awareness-raising programmes) and enforcement (including commodity identification, risk-assessment and detection methods).

Implementing entity: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

Budget: EUR 475 000

Official Journal: L 127, 15.5.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Implemented

Closed on 30.11.2012

Council Joint Action 2008/314/CFSP of 14 April 2008 on support for IAEA activities in the areas of nuclear security and verification — IAEA IV

The objectives are:

| (a) | strengthening national legislative and regulatory infrastructures for the implementation of relevant international instruments in the areas of nuclear security and verification, including comprehensive safeguards agreements and the Additional Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

strengthening national legislative and regulatory infrastructures for the implementation of relevant international instruments in the areas of nuclear security and verification, including comprehensive safeguards agreements and the Additional Protocol;

| (b) | assisting States in strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

assisting States in strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials;

| (c) | strengthening States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking in nuclear and other radioactive materials. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

strengthening States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking in nuclear and other radioactive materials.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Budget: EUR 7 703 000

Official Journal: L 107, 17.4.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Implemented

To be closed in 2013

Council Joint Action 2008/307/CFSP of 14 April 2008 in support of World Health Organisation activities in the area of laboratory bio-safety and bio-security

The overall objective is to support, the implementation of the BTWC, in particular those aspects that relate to the safety and security of microbial or other biological agents and toxins in laboratories and other facilities, including during transportation as appropriate, in order to prevent unauthorised access to and removal of such agents and toxins.

| (a) | promotion of bio-risk reduction management through regional and national outreach; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promotion of bio-risk reduction management through regional and national outreach;

| (b) | strengthening the security and laboratory management practices against biological risks. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

strengthening the security and laboratory management practices against biological risks.

Implementing entity: The World Health Organisation

Budget: EUR 2 105 000

Official Journal: L 106, 16.4.2008

Estimated duration of the action: 24 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2007/753/CFSP of 19 November 2007 in support of IAEA monitoring and verification activities in the DPRK

The objective is to contribute to the implementation of monitoring and verification activities in the DPRK, in accordance with the Initial Actions of 13 February 2007, as agreed in the framework of the six-partytalks.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA Department of Safeguards)

Budget: EUR 1 780 000

Official Journal: L 304, 22.11.2007

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Suspension, force majeure

Council Joint Action 2007/468/CFSP of 28 June 2007 — CTBTO II

The objective is to support the early entry into force of the Treaty, and need to the rapid build-up of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) verification regime via:

| (a) | improvement of the knowledge of Provisional Technical Secretariat noble gas measurements; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

improvement of the knowledge of Provisional Technical Secretariat noble gas measurements;

| (b) | support to on-site inspection via the support for the Preparations for the Integrated Field Exercise 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

support to on-site inspection via the support for the Preparations for the Integrated Field Exercise 2008.

Implementing entity: The CTBTO Preparatory Commission

Budget: EUR 1 670 000

Official Journal: L 176, 6.7.2007

Estimated duration of the action: 15 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2007/185/CFSP of 19 March 2007 — OPCW

The objective is to support the universalisation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), and in particular to promote the ratification/accession to the CWC by States not Parties (signatory States as well as non-signatory States) and to support the full implementation of the CWC by the States Parties:

| (a) | promotion of universality of the CWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promotion of universality of the CWC;

| (b) | support for full implementation of the CWC by States Parties; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

support for full implementation of the CWC by States Parties;

| (c) | international cooperation in the field of chemical activities, as accompanying measures to the implementation of the CWC; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

international cooperation in the field of chemical activities, as accompanying measures to the implementation of the CWC;

| (d) | support for the creation of a collaborative framework among the chemical industry, OPCW and national authorities in the context of the 10th anniversary of the OPCW. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

support for the creation of a collaborative framework among the chemical industry, OPCW and national authorities in the context of the 10th anniversary of the OPCW.

Implementing entity: The Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons

Budget: EUR 1 700 000

Official Journal: L 85, 27.3.2007

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2007/178/CFSP of 19 March 2007 — Russian Federation IV

The objective is to assist the Russian Federation in destroying some of its chemical weapons, towards fulfilment of Russia’s obligations under the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction. This Joint Action supported the completion of the electricity supply infrastructure at Shchuch’ye chemical weapon destruction facility, in order to provide a reliable power supply for the operation of the chemical weapon destruction facility.

Implementing entity: The Ministry of Defence of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Budget: EUR 3 145 000

Official Journal: L 81, 22.3.2007

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2006/418/CFSP of 12 June 2006 — IAEA III

The objective is to strengthen nuclear security in selected countries which have received EU assistance such as:

| (a) | legislative and regulatory assistance; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

legislative and regulatory assistance;

| (b) | strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

strengthening the security and control of nuclear and other radioactive materials;

| (c) | strengthening of States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

strengthening of States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency

Budget: EUR 6 995 000

Official Journal: L 165, 17.6.2006

Estimated duration of the action: 15 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2006/419/CFSP of 12 June 2006 — UNSCR 1540

The action aimed at addressing three aspects of the implementation:

| (a) | awareness-raising of requirements and obligations under the Resolution; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

awareness-raising of requirements and obligations under the Resolution;

| (b) | contributing to strengthening national capacities in three target regions (Africa, Latin America and Caribbean, Asia-Pacific) in drafting national reports on the implementation of UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004); and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

contributing to strengthening national capacities in three target regions (Africa, Latin America and Caribbean, Asia-Pacific) in drafting national reports on the implementation of UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004); and

| (c) | sharing experience from the adoption of national measures required for the implementation of the Resolution. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

sharing experience from the adoption of national measures required for the implementation of the Resolution.

Implementing entity: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

Budget: EUR 195 000

Official Journal: L 165, 17.6.2006

Estimated duration of the action: 22 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2006/243/CFSP of 20 March 2006 — CTBTO I

The objective is to improve the capacity of CTBT Signatory States to fulfil their verification responsibilities under the CTBT and to enable them to fully benefit from participation in the treaty regime by a computer-based training/self-study.

Implementing entity: The CTBTO Preparatory Commission

Budget: EUR 1 133 000

Official Journal: L 88, 25.3.2006

Estimated duration of the action: 15 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2006/184/CFSP of 27 February 2006 — BTWC

Overall objective: to support the universalisation of the BTWC and, in particular, to promote the accession to the BTWC by States not Party (signatory States as well as non-signatory States) and to support the implementation of the BTWC by the States Parties.

| (a) | promotion of the universality of the BTWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promotion of the universality of the BTWC;

| (b) | support for implementation of the BTWC by the States Parties. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

support for implementation of the BTWC by the States Parties.

Implementing entity: The Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva

Budget: EUR 867 000

Official Journal: L 65, 7.3.2006

Estimated duration of the action: 18 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2005/913/CFSP of 12 December 2005 — OPCW II

The objective is to support the universalisation of the CWC and in particular to promote the accession to the CWC by States not Party (signatory States as well as non-signatory States) and to support the implementation of the CWC by the States Parties:

| (a) | promotion of universality of the CWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promotion of universality of the CWC;

| (b) | support for implementation of the CWC by the States Parties; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

support for implementation of the CWC by the States Parties;

| (c) | international cooperation in the field of chemical activities. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

international cooperation in the field of chemical activities.

Implementing entity: The Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons

Budget: EUR 1 697 000

Official Journal: L 331, 17.12.2005

Estimated duration of the action: 12 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2005/574/CFSP of 18 July 2005 — IAEA II

The objective is to strengthen nuclear security in selected countries which have received EU assistance such as:

| (a) | strengthening the physical protection of nuclear materials and other radioactive materials in use, storage and transport and of nuclear facilities; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

strengthening the physical protection of nuclear materials and other radioactive materials in use, storage and transport and of nuclear facilities;

| (b) | strengthening of security of radioactive materials in non-nuclear applications; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

strengthening of security of radioactive materials in non-nuclear applications;

| (c) | strengthening of States’ capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

strengthening of States’ capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking;

| (d) | legislative assistance for the implementation of States’ obligations under IAEA safeguards agreements and additional protocols. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

legislative assistance for the implementation of States’ obligations under IAEA safeguards agreements and additional protocols.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency

Budget: EUR 3 914 000

Official Journal: L 193, 23.7.2005

Estimated duration of the action: 15 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2004/797/CFSP of 22 November 2004 — OPCW I

The objective is to support the universalisation of the CWC and in particular to promote the accession to the CWC by States not Party (signatory States as well as non-signatory States) and to support the implementation of the CWC by the States Parties

| (a) | promotion of universality of the CWC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promotion of universality of the CWC;

| (b) | support for implementation of the CWC by the States Parties; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

support for implementation of the CWC by the States Parties;

| (c) | international cooperation in the field of chemical activities. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

international cooperation in the field of chemical activities.

Implementing entity: The Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons

Budget: EUR 1 841 000

Official Journal: L 349, 25.11.2004

Estimated duration of the action: 12 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2004/796/CFSP of 22 November 2004 — Russian Federation III

The objective is to contribute to reinforcing the physical protection of nuclear sites in Russia, so as to reduce the risk of theft of nuclear fissile material and of sabotage by improving the physical protection for fissile materials at the Bochvar Institute in Moscow (VNIINM) of the Russian Federal Agency for Atomic Energy FAAE (formerly MINATOM).

Implementing entity: The Federal Republic of Germany

Budget: EUR 7 730 000

Official Journal: L 349, 25.11.2004

Estimated duration of the action: 36 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2004/495/CFSP of 17 May 2004 — IAEA I

The objective is to strengthen nuclear security in selected countries which have received EU assistance such as:

| (a) | strengthening the physical protection of nuclear materials and other radioactive materials in use, storage and transport and of nuclear facilities; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

strengthening the physical protection of nuclear materials and other radioactive materials in use, storage and transport and of nuclear facilities;

| (b) | strengthening of security of radioactive materials in non-nuclear applications; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

strengthening of security of radioactive materials in non-nuclear applications;

| (c) | strengthening of States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

strengthening of States' capabilities for detection and response to illicit trafficking.

Implementing entity: The International Atomic Energy Agency

Budget: EUR 3 329 000

Official Journal: L 182, 19.5.2004

Estimated duration of the action: 15 months

Implemented

Council Joint Action 2003/472/CFSP of 24 June 2003 — Russian Federation II

This Joint Action aims at financing a unit of experts under the cooperation programme for non-proliferation and disarmament in the Russian Federation.

Implementing entity: The Russian Federation

Budget: EUR 680 000

Official Journal: L 157, 26.6.2003

Expired on the date of expiry of EU Common Strategy 1999/414/CFSP on Russia

Implemented

Council Joint Action 1999/878/CFSP of 17 December 1999 — Russian Federation I

The project contributed to:

| (a) | a chemical weapons pilot destruction plant situated in Gorny, Saratov region, Russia; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a chemical weapons pilot destruction plant situated in Gorny, Saratov region, Russia;

| (b) | a set studies and experimental studies on plutonium transport, storage and disposition. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a set studies and experimental studies on plutonium transport, storage and disposition.

Implementing entity: The Russian Federation

Budget: EUR 8 900 000

Official Journal: L 331, 23.12.1999

Estimated duration of the action: 48 months

Implemented

---

ANNEX II

ANNEX TO THE SIX-MONTHLY WMD PROGRESS REPORT

Overview of instrument for stability, priority 1

‘Risk mitigation and preparedness relating to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear materials or agents’

| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n.a. | Retraining former weapon scientists and engineers through support for International Science and Technology Centre (ISTC, Moscow) and Science and Technology Centre (STCU, Kiev) | The main objective of the Centres is to redirect scientists/engineers' talents to civilian and peaceful activities through science and technological cooperation. | ISTC/STCU | | TACIS |
| EUR 235 million | 1997-2006 |
| | IFS |
| EUR 15 million | 2007 |
| EUR 8 million | 2008 |
| EUR 7,5 million | 2009 |
| EUR 5,0 million | 2010 |
| EUR 4,5 million | 2011 |
| EUR 4,0 million | 2012 |

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

n.a.

Retraining former weapon scientists and engineers through support for International Science and Technology Centre (ISTC, Moscow) and Science and Technology Centre (STCU, Kiev)

The main objective of the Centres is to redirect scientists/engineers' talents to civilian and peaceful activities through science and technological cooperation.

ISTC/STCU

TACIS

EUR 235 million

1997-2006

IFS

EUR 15 million

2007

EUR 8 million

2008

EUR 7,5 million

2009

EUR 5,0 million

2010

EUR 4,5 million

2011

EUR 4,0 million

2012

| AAP 2007 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| IFS/2008/145-156 | Combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials in FSU countries (Russian Federation, Ukraine, Armenia, Moldova, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Belarus) | The purpose of the action is to supply equipment for detection of NRM at border check points as it was identified in the previous phase of the activity financed by TACIS Nuclear Safety programme, contributing thus to reduce nuclear and radiation terrorism threat. | JRC | EUR 5 million | 11.7.2008-12.4.2013 |
| IFS/2008/145-130 | Assistance in export control of dual-use goods | The specific objective is to support the development of the legal framework and institutional capacities for the establishment and enforcement of effective export controls on dual-use items, including measures for regional cooperation with a view of contributing to the fight against the proliferation of WMD and related materials, equipment and technologies. | BAFA (D) | ca EUR 5 million | 19.3.2008-31.12.2010 |
| IFS/2008/145-132 | Knowledge Management System on CBRN Trafficking | The overall objective of the activity is to improve capabilities of participating states, neighbouring countries of the EU in South-East Europe and possibly Caucasus, to combat the illicit trafficking and criminal use of CBRN materials (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’). | UNICRI | EUR 1 million | 31.1.2008-1.8.2010 |

AAP 2007 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

IFS/2008/145-156

Combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials in FSU countries (Russian Federation, Ukraine, Armenia, Moldova, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Belarus)

The purpose of the action is to supply equipment for detection of NRM at border check points as it was identified in the previous phase of the activity financed by TACIS Nuclear Safety programme, contributing thus to reduce nuclear and radiation terrorism threat.

JRC

EUR 5 million

11.7.2008-12.4.2013

IFS/2008/145-130

Assistance in export control of dual-use goods

The specific objective is to support the development of the legal framework and institutional capacities for the establishment and enforcement of effective export controls on dual-use items, including measures for regional cooperation with a view of contributing to the fight against the proliferation of WMD and related materials, equipment and technologies.

BAFA (D)

ca EUR 5 million

19.3.2008-31.12.2010

IFS/2008/145-132

Knowledge Management System on CBRN Trafficking

The overall objective of the activity is to improve capabilities of participating states, neighbouring countries of the EU in South-East Europe and possibly Caucasus, to combat the illicit trafficking and criminal use of CBRN materials (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’).

UNICRI

EUR 1 million

31.1.2008-1.8.2010

| AAP 2008 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| IFS/2009/200-523 | Knowledge management system on CBRN trafficking in North Africa and selected countries in the Middle East | The aim of the project would be to develop a durable cooperation legacy in the area of trafficking of CBRN materials (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’). | UNICRI | EUR 1 million | 16.3.2009-15.7.2011 |
| IFS/2009/217-540 | Strengthening bio-safety and bio-security capabilities in Central Asian countries | The project will address shortcomings in the safety/security practices of key biological facilities in selected countries of Central Asia. The main objectives of the project are to raise the skills of the personnel working at facilities (laboratories) handling dangerous biological agents or supervising those facilities, and to provide additional equipment, as needed, to ensure an adequate level of bio-safety and security. | ISTC | EUR 6,8 million | 21.9.2009-21.9.2014 |
| IFS/2009/219-636 | Combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials in selected FSU and Mediterranean Basin countries and preparation of border management activities in the ASEAN region | The overall objective of this project is to reduce the threat of nuclear and radiation terrorism. For this purpose, the assistance will be provided to the partner countries in the improvement of the technical and organisational measures for detection of nuclear and radioactive materials (NRM) illicit trafficking. | JRC | EUR 6,7 million | 2.12.2009-1.12.2014 |
| IFS/2009/216-327 | Awareness-raising of exporters export Control of dual-use goods | The overall objective of the project is to enhance the effectiveness of export control of dual-use items in the Russian Federation, with a view to contribute to the fight against the proliferation of WMD. The specific objectives will be achieved through information exchange with EU exporters, support industry and researchers for awareness-raising, organisation of seminars for exporters in the regions of the Russian Federation. | Russian independent non-profit organisation for professional advancement ‘Export Control Training Centre’ | EUR 1 million | 1.9.2009-1.3.2011 |

AAP 2008 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

IFS/2009/200-523

Knowledge management system on CBRN trafficking in North Africa and selected countries in the Middle East

The aim of the project would be to develop a durable cooperation legacy in the area of trafficking of CBRN materials (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’).

UNICRI

EUR 1 million

16.3.2009-15.7.2011

IFS/2009/217-540

Strengthening bio-safety and bio-security capabilities in Central Asian countries

The project will address shortcomings in the safety/security practices of key biological facilities in selected countries of Central Asia. The main objectives of the project are to raise the skills of the personnel working at facilities (laboratories) handling dangerous biological agents or supervising those facilities, and to provide additional equipment, as needed, to ensure an adequate level of bio-safety and security.

ISTC

EUR 6,8 million

21.9.2009-21.9.2014

IFS/2009/219-636

Combating illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials in selected FSU and Mediterranean Basin countries and preparation of border management activities in the ASEAN region

The overall objective of this project is to reduce the threat of nuclear and radiation terrorism. For this purpose, the assistance will be provided to the partner countries in the improvement of the technical and organisational measures for detection of nuclear and radioactive materials (NRM) illicit trafficking.

JRC

EUR 6,7 million

2.12.2009-1.12.2014

IFS/2009/216-327

Awareness-raising of exporters export Control of dual-use goods

The overall objective of the project is to enhance the effectiveness of export control of dual-use items in the Russian Federation, with a view to contribute to the fight against the proliferation of WMD. The specific objectives will be achieved through information exchange with EU exporters, support industry and researchers for awareness-raising, organisation of seminars for exporters in the regions of the Russian Federation.

Russian independent non-profit organisation for professional advancement ‘Export Control Training Centre’

EUR 1 million

1.9.2009-1.3.2011

| AAP 2009 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| IFS/2010/239-471 (UNICRI main) — IFS/2010/239-481 (JRC main) — IFS/2010/253-483 and IFS/2010/253-485 (pilot projects JRC and Univ. Milan)/IFS/2010/250-984 (UNICRI establishment of 2 Secretariats) | CBRN Centre of Excellence — First Phase | To set up a mechanism contributing to strengthen the long-term national and regional capabilities of responsible authorities and to develop a durable cooperation legacy in the fight against the CBRN threat | UNICRI/JRC main contracts/2 pilot projects in South-East Asia/first step (2 Secretariats in Caucasus and South-East Asia) | EUR 5 million | May 2010-May 2012 |
| IFS/2010/235-364 | Border monitoring activities in the Republic of Georgia, Central Asia and Afghanistan | To enhance the detection of radioactive and nuclear materials at identified borders crossing and/or nodal points in the Republic of Georgia, at Southern borders of selected Central Asian countries with Afghanistan and at the airport of Kabul | JRC | EUR 4 million | 4.5.2010-4.5.2013 |
| IFS/2010/238-194 | EpiSouth: a network for the control of health and security threats and other bio-security risks in the Mediterranean Region and South-East Europe | To increase through capacity-building the bio-security in the Mediterranean region and South-East Europe (10 EU + 17 non EU countries) | Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome (Italy) | EUR 3 million | 15.10.2010-15.4.2013 |
| IFS/2010/247-264 (service)
  IFS/2010/248-064 + IFS/2010/258-635 (supply) | Redirection of former Iraqi WMD scientists through capacity-building for decommissioning of nuclear facilities, including site and radioactive waste management | To assist Iraq with redirection of scientists and engineers possessing WMD-related skills and dual-use knowledge through their engagement in a comprehensive decommissioning, dismantling and decontamination of nuclear facilities | UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DELL'INSUBRIA (service) — CANBERRA + NNL (supplies) | EUR 2,5 million
  (1,5 M for service + 1,5 M for supplies) | Aug 2010-Aug 2013 |
| IFS/2010/253-484 | Knowledge Management System on CBRN risk mitigation — Evolving towards CoE ‘Mediterranean Basin’ | To integrate the existing Knowledge Management Systems, namely for South-East Europe and for North Africa, and to prepare the evolution towards a Centre of Excellence in the Mediterranean Basin dealing with CBRN risk mitigation (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’) | UNICRI | EUR 0,5 million | 25.11.2010-30.4.2012 |
| IFS/2010/254-942 | Bio-safety and bio-security improvement at the Ukrainian anti-plague station (UAPS) in Simferopol | To contribute to full implementation of the BTWC (Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention) in Ukraine, which includes the prevention of illicit access to pathogens by terrorists and other criminals | STCU | EUR 4 million | 22.11.2010-21.8.2014 |
| IFS/2010/256-885 | Assistance in export control of dual-use goods | Continuation of the ongoing activities in this field in the already covered countries, with possible extension to other regions/countries | BAFA (D) | EUR 5 million | 21.12.2010-1.7.2013 |

AAP 2009 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

IFS/2010/239-471 (UNICRI main) — IFS/2010/239-481 (JRC main) — IFS/2010/253-483 and IFS/2010/253-485 (pilot projects JRC and Univ. Milan)/IFS/2010/250-984 (UNICRI establishment of 2 Secretariats)

CBRN Centre of Excellence — First Phase

To set up a mechanism contributing to strengthen the long-term national and regional capabilities of responsible authorities and to develop a durable cooperation legacy in the fight against the CBRN threat

UNICRI/JRC main contracts/2 pilot projects in South-East Asia/first step (2 Secretariats in Caucasus and South-East Asia)

EUR 5 million

May 2010-May 2012

IFS/2010/235-364

Border monitoring activities in the Republic of Georgia, Central Asia and Afghanistan

To enhance the detection of radioactive and nuclear materials at identified borders crossing and/or nodal points in the Republic of Georgia, at Southern borders of selected Central Asian countries with Afghanistan and at the airport of Kabul

JRC

EUR 4 million

4.5.2010-4.5.2013

IFS/2010/238-194

EpiSouth: a network for the control of health and security threats and other bio-security risks in the Mediterranean Region and South-East Europe

To increase through capacity-building the bio-security in the Mediterranean region and South-East Europe (10 EU + 17 non EU countries)

Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome (Italy)

EUR 3 million

15.10.2010-15.4.2013

IFS/2010/247-264 (service)

IFS/2010/248-064 + IFS/2010/258-635 (supply)

Redirection of former Iraqi WMD scientists through capacity-building for decommissioning of nuclear facilities, including site and radioactive waste management

To assist Iraq with redirection of scientists and engineers possessing WMD-related skills and dual-use knowledge through their engagement in a comprehensive decommissioning, dismantling and decontamination of nuclear facilities

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DELL'INSUBRIA (service) — CANBERRA + NNL (supplies)

EUR 2,5 million

(1,5 M for service + 1,5 M for supplies)

Aug 2010-Aug 2013

IFS/2010/253-484

Knowledge Management System on CBRN risk mitigation — Evolving towards CoE ‘Mediterranean Basin’

To integrate the existing Knowledge Management Systems, namely for South-East Europe and for North Africa, and to prepare the evolution towards a Centre of Excellence in the Mediterranean Basin dealing with CBRN risk mitigation (preparation phase to ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’)

UNICRI

EUR 0,5 million

25.11.2010-30.4.2012

IFS/2010/254-942

Bio-safety and bio-security improvement at the Ukrainian anti-plague station (UAPS) in Simferopol

To contribute to full implementation of the BTWC (Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention) in Ukraine, which includes the prevention of illicit access to pathogens by terrorists and other criminals

STCU

EUR 4 million

22.11.2010-21.8.2014

IFS/2010/256-885

Assistance in export control of dual-use goods

Continuation of the ongoing activities in this field in the already covered countries, with possible extension to other regions/countries

BAFA (D)

EUR 5 million

21.12.2010-1.7.2013

| AAP 2010 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| IFS/2011/263-555 (set-up)
  IFS/2011/273-506 (actions) | CBRN Centres of Excellence — Second phase | Set-up of three to four new centres in the Middle East and, possibly, Gulf region, Mediterranean Basin, Central Asia and Southern Africa and extension of the projects in South-East Asia and in Ukraine/South Caucasus and implementation of thematic projects in all project areas of priority 1 | UNICRI | EUR 4,5 million
  EUR 16,3 million | 23.8.2011-28.2.2013 |
| IFS/2011/273-571 | Enhancing the capability of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Service (ECAS) — EU contribution to the new Nuclear Material Laboratory (NML) | To ensure that the IAEA has a strong independent analytical capability for safeguards in the decades to come by means of expansion and modernisation of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Services | IAEA | EUR 5 million | 30.11.2011-30.11.2015 |
| IFS/2011/272-372 (service) and IFS/2011/272-424 (supplies) | Establishment of Mobile Laboratories for Pathogens up to Risk Group 4 in combination with CBRN Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa | Implementation of two units of mobile labs to be used to perform diagnosis of up to group 4 infectious agents in sub-Saharan Africa and one ‘stand-by’ unit based in EU for training purposes and to be deployed in other countries outside EU where these agents are endemic or outbreaks occur | BERNHARD-NOCHT-INSTITUT FUR TROPENMEDIZIN (service) — supply under evaluation | EUR 3,5 million | 15.12.2011-14.12.2015 |
| IFS/2011/273-572 | Strengthening bio-safety and bio-security capabilities in South Caucasus and in Central Asian Countries | To raise the capabilities of State organisations in target countries responsible for bio-safety and bio-security in a way that will result in a substantial improvement of the countries’ bio-safety/security situations | UNICRI | EUR 5 million | 1.1.2012-31.12.2015 |

AAP 2010 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

IFS/2011/263-555 (set-up)

IFS/2011/273-506 (actions)

CBRN Centres of Excellence — Second phase

Set-up of three to four new centres in the Middle East and, possibly, Gulf region, Mediterranean Basin, Central Asia and Southern Africa and extension of the projects in South-East Asia and in Ukraine/South Caucasus and implementation of thematic projects in all project areas of priority 1

UNICRI

EUR 4,5 million

EUR 16,3 million

23.8.2011-28.2.2013

IFS/2011/273-571

Enhancing the capability of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Service (ECAS) — EU contribution to the new Nuclear Material Laboratory (NML)

To ensure that the IAEA has a strong independent analytical capability for safeguards in the decades to come by means of expansion and modernisation of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Services

IAEA

EUR 5 million

30.11.2011-30.11.2015

IFS/2011/272-372 (service) and IFS/2011/272-424 (supplies)

Establishment of Mobile Laboratories for Pathogens up to Risk Group 4 in combination with CBRN Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa

Implementation of two units of mobile labs to be used to perform diagnosis of up to group 4 infectious agents in sub-Saharan Africa and one ‘stand-by’ unit based in EU for training purposes and to be deployed in other countries outside EU where these agents are endemic or outbreaks occur

BERNHARD-NOCHT-INSTITUT FUR TROPENMEDIZIN (service) — supply under evaluation

EUR 3,5 million

15.12.2011-14.12.2015

IFS/2011/273-572

Strengthening bio-safety and bio-security capabilities in South Caucasus and in Central Asian Countries

To raise the capabilities of State organisations in target countries responsible for bio-safety and bio-security in a way that will result in a substantial improvement of the countries’ bio-safety/security situations

UNICRI

EUR 5 million

1.1.2012-31.12.2015

| AAP 2011 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| IFS/2011/278-349 | Multilateral Nuclear Assurances — EU contribution to the Low Enriched Uranium bank under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) | The IfS contribution (EUR 20 million) will be dedicated to the purchase of a quantity of Low Enriched Uranium. | IAEA | EUR 20 million | 30.11.2011-30.11.2013 |
| — | Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence — Third Phase | (1) to extend existing activities (management contracts with JRC and UNICRI) until the end of 2014 with the aim of improving national CBRN policies and defining comprehensive tailored assistance packages, in a coherent and effective combination of national and regional dimensions (EUR 5,5 million); (2) to improve national CBRN policies through the implementation of concrete actions in the areas of export control of dual-use goods, illicit trafficking of CBRN materials, bio-safety and bio-security, scientists' engagement (EUR 9,2 million) including governance. | | EUR 14,7 million | 1.2013-12.2014 |
| — | Border monitoring activities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Russian Federation, Ukraine and South-East Asia | To counteract nuclear and radiation terrorism threats — for this purpose, the assistance should be provided to the identified countries in the improvement of the technical and organisational measures for detection of Nuclear and Radioactive Materials (NRM) illicit trafficking, including training and establishment of an expert network. | | EUR 5,8 million | 1.2013-12.2014 |
| — | Co-operation in export control of dual-use goods | To strengthen the export control systems of partner countries, with a strong link with the Regional Centres of Excellence activities, by aligning them to the standard of the international export control regimes and treaties and therefore meeting the requirements of the UNSCR 1540 (2004) | | EUR 3,65 million | 1.2013-12.2014 |

AAP 2011 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

IFS/2011/278-349

Multilateral Nuclear Assurances — EU contribution to the Low Enriched Uranium bank under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

The IfS contribution (EUR 20 million) will be dedicated to the purchase of a quantity of Low Enriched Uranium.

IAEA

EUR 20 million

30.11.2011-30.11.2013

—

Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence — Third Phase

(1) to extend existing activities (management contracts with JRC and UNICRI) until the end of 2014 with the aim of improving national CBRN policies and defining comprehensive tailored assistance packages, in a coherent and effective combination of national and regional dimensions (EUR 5,5 million); (2) to improve national CBRN policies through the implementation of concrete actions in the areas of export control of dual-use goods, illicit trafficking of CBRN materials, bio-safety and bio-security, scientists' engagement (EUR 9,2 million) including governance.

EUR 14,7 million

1.2013-12.2014

—

Border monitoring activities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Russian Federation, Ukraine and South-East Asia

To counteract nuclear and radiation terrorism threats — for this purpose, the assistance should be provided to the identified countries in the improvement of the technical and organisational measures for detection of Nuclear and Radioactive Materials (NRM) illicit trafficking, including training and establishment of an expert network.

EUR 5,8 million

1.2013-12.2014

—

Co-operation in export control of dual-use goods

To strengthen the export control systems of partner countries, with a strong link with the Regional Centres of Excellence activities, by aligning them to the standard of the international export control regimes and treaties and therefore meeting the requirements of the UNSCR 1540 (2004)

EUR 3,65 million

1.2013-12.2014

| AAP 2012 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU) |
| --- |
| Project identification | Title | Objective | Contractor | Amount | Execution period |
| — | Enhancing the Capability of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safeguards Analytical Service (ECAS) — EU contribution to the new Nuclear Material Laboratory (NML) | To support ECAS in their effort to constructing and outfitting laboratories for the analysis of special and environmental samples according to the latest quality and safety standards, with sample logistics being an integral part of it to ensure that the IAEA has a strong independent analytical capability or safeguards in the decades to come by means of expansion and modernisation of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Services | IAEA | EUR 5 million | 1.2013-12.2014 |
| — | Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence — Fourth Phase | (1) To extend existing activities (management contracts with JRC) until the end of 2014 (EUR 3,5 million); (2) to extend the existing Regional Secretariats managed by UNICRI until the end of 2014 (EUR 3,1 million); and (3) to improve national CBRN policies through the implementation of concrete actions in the areas of export control of dual-use goods, illicit trafficking of CBRN materials, bio-safety and bio-security, engagement of scientists (EUR 30,2 million) | JRC
  UNICRI
  Consortia (EU MS) | EUR 36,8 million | 1.2013-12.2014 |

AAP 2012 (Excluding funding for ISTC/STCU)

Project identification

Title

Objective

Contractor

Amount

Execution period

—

Enhancing the Capability of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safeguards Analytical Service (ECAS) — EU contribution to the new Nuclear Material Laboratory (NML)

To support ECAS in their effort to constructing and outfitting laboratories for the analysis of special and environmental samples according to the latest quality and safety standards, with sample logistics being an integral part of it to ensure that the IAEA has a strong independent analytical capability or safeguards in the decades to come by means of expansion and modernisation of the IAEA Safeguards Analytical Services

IAEA

EUR 5 million

1.2013-12.2014

—

Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence — Fourth Phase

(1) To extend existing activities (management contracts with JRC) until the end of 2014 (EUR 3,5 million); (2) to extend the existing Regional Secretariats managed by UNICRI until the end of 2014 (EUR 3,1 million); and (3) to improve national CBRN policies through the implementation of concrete actions in the areas of export control of dual-use goods, illicit trafficking of CBRN materials, bio-safety and bio-security, engagement of scientists (EUR 30,2 million)

JRC

UNICRI

Consortia (EU MS)

EUR 36,8 million

1.2013-12.2014

---

European Commission

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/27

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 August 2013

2013/C 228/06

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3280 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4567 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86575 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7112 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2313 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8610 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,920 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2144 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4053 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5620 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4817 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3778 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3002 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6890 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6842 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 480,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1232 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1295 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5138 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 656,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3116 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,804 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,6945 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,699 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0550 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8058 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,7540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3280

JPY

Japanese yen

130,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4567

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86575

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7112

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2313

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8610

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,920

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2144

RON

Romanian leu

4,4053

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5620

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4817

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3778

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3002

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6890

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6842

KRW

South Korean won

1 480,31

ZAR

South African rand

13,1232

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1295

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5138

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 656,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3116

PHP

Philippine peso

57,804

RUB

Russian rouble

43,6945

THB

Thai baht

41,699

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0550

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8058

INR

Indian rupee

80,7540

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/28

---

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS

Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

2013/C 228/07

Article 107(1), (2) and (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Reference period: July 2013

Application period: October, November and December 2013

| 07-2013 | EUR | BGN | CZK | DKK | HRK | LVL | LTL | HUF |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EUR = | 1 | 1,95580 | 25,9439 | 7,45793 | 7,50609 | 0,702365 | 3,45280 | 294,899 |
| 1 BGN = | 0,511300 | 1 | 13,2651 | 3,81324 | 3,83786 | 0,359119 | 1,76542 | 150,782 |
| 1 CZK = | 0,0385447 | 0,0753857 | 1 | 0,287463 | 0,289320 | 0,0270724 | 0,133087 | 11,3668 |
| 1 DKK = | 0,134086 | 0,262244 | 3,47870 | 1 | 1,00646 | 0,0941770 | 0,462971 | 39,5416 |
| 1 HRK = | 0,133225 | 0,260562 | 3,45638 | 0,993584 | 1 | 0,0935728 | 0,460000 | 39,2879 |
| 1 LVL = | 1,42376 | 2,78459 | 36,9379 | 10,6183 | 10,6869 | 1 | 4,91596 | 419,865 |
| 1 LTL = | 0,289620 | 0,566439 | 7,51388 | 2,15996 | 2,17391 | 0,203419 | 1 | 85,4086 |
| 1 HUF = | 0,00339099 | 0,00663211 | 0,0879757 | 0,0252898 | 0,0254531 | 0,00238172 | 0,0117084 | 1 |
| 1 PLN = | 0,233943 | 0,457545 | 6,06939 | 1,74473 | 1,75600 | 0,164313 | 0,807758 | 68,9894 |
| 1 RON = | 0,226020 | 0,442051 | 5,86386 | 1,68564 | 1,69653 | 0,158749 | 0,780403 | 66,6531 |
| 1 SEK = | 0,115461 | 0,225819 | 2,99551 | 0,861101 | 0,866661 | 0,0810959 | 0,398664 | 34,0493 |
| 1 GBP = | 1,16020 | 2,26911 | 30,1000 | 8,65265 | 8,70853 | 0,814881 | 4,00592 | 342,140 |
| 1 NOK = | 0,126843 | 0,248080 | 3,29081 | 0,945988 | 0,952097 | 0,0890904 | 0,437965 | 37,4059 |
| 1 ISK = | 0,00623761 | 0,0121995 | 0,161828 | 0,0465196 | 0,0468200 | 0,00438108 | 0,0215372 | 1,83946 |
| 1 CHF = | 0,808677 | 1,58161 | 20,9803 | 6,03106 | 6,07000 | 0,567987 | 2,79220 | 238,478 |

07-2013

EUR

BGN

CZK

DKK

HRK

LVL

LTL

HUF

1 EUR =

1

1,95580

25,9439

7,45793

7,50609

0,702365

3,45280

294,899

1 BGN =

0,511300

1

13,2651

3,81324

3,83786

0,359119

1,76542

150,782

1 CZK =

0,0385447

0,0753857

1

0,287463

0,289320

0,0270724

0,133087

11,3668

1 DKK =

0,134086

0,262244

3,47870

1

1,00646

0,0941770

0,462971

39,5416

1 HRK =

0,133225

0,260562

3,45638

0,993584

1

0,0935728

0,460000

39,2879

1 LVL =

1,42376

2,78459

36,9379

10,6183

10,6869

1

4,91596

419,865

1 LTL =

0,289620

0,566439

7,51388

2,15996

2,17391

0,203419

1

85,4086

1 HUF =

0,00339099

0,00663211

0,0879757

0,0252898

0,0254531

0,00238172

0,0117084

1

1 PLN =

0,233943

0,457545

6,06939

1,74473

1,75600

0,164313

0,807758

68,9894

1 RON =

0,226020

0,442051

5,86386

1,68564

1,69653

0,158749

0,780403

66,6531

1 SEK =

0,115461

0,225819

2,99551

0,861101

0,866661

0,0810959

0,398664

34,0493

1 GBP =

1,16020

2,26911

30,1000

8,65265

8,70853

0,814881

4,00592

342,140

1 NOK =

0,126843

0,248080

3,29081

0,945988

0,952097

0,0890904

0,437965

37,4059

1 ISK =

0,00623761

0,0121995

0,161828

0,0465196

0,0468200

0,00438108

0,0215372

1,83946

1 CHF =

0,808677

1,58161

20,9803

6,03106

6,07000

0,567987

2,79220

238,478

| 07-2013 | PLN | RON | SEK | GBP | NOK | ISK | CHF |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EUR = | 4,27455 | 4,42438 | 8,66092 | 0,861924 | 7,88374 | 160,318 | 1,23659 |
| 1 BGN = | 2,18558 | 2,26218 | 4,42833 | 0,440701 | 4,03095 | 81,9705 | 0,632267 |
| 1 CZK = | 0,164761 | 0,170536 | 0,333833 | 0,0332226 | 0,303876 | 6,17940 | 0,0476639 |
| 1 DKK = | 0,573155 | 0,593245 | 1,16130 | 0,115572 | 1,05710 | 21,4963 | 0,165808 |
| 1 HRK = | 0,569478 | 0,589439 | 1,15385 | 0,114830 | 1,05031 | 21,3584 | 0,164745 |
| 1 LVL = | 6,08593 | 6,29926 | 12,3311 | 1,22717 | 11,2246 | 228,254 | 1,76060 |
| 1 LTL = | 1,23799 | 1,28139 | 2,50838 | 0,249630 | 2,28329 | 46,4313 | 0,358140 |
| 1 HUF = | 0,0144950 | 0,0150030 | 0,0293691 | 0,00292278 | 0,0267337 | 0,543637 | 0,00419326 |
| 1 PLN = | 1 | 1,03505 | 2,02616 | 0,201641 | 1,84434 | 37,5052 | 0,289291 |
| 1 RON = | 0,966135 | 1 | 1,95755 | 0,194812 | 1,78189 | 36,2351 | 0,279494 |
| 1 SEK = | 0,493544 | 0,510844 | 1 | 0,0995187 | 0,910266 | 18,5105 | 0,142778 |
| 1 GBP = | 4,95931 | 5,13314 | 10,0484 | 1 | 9,14668 | 186,000 | 1,43468 |
| 1 NOK = | 0,542198 | 0,561203 | 1,09858 | 0,109329 | 1 | 20,3353 | 0,156853 |
| 1 ISK = | 0,0266630 | 0,0275975 | 0,0540234 | 0,00537634 | 0,0491757 | 1 | 0,00771335 |
| 1 CHF = | 3,45673 | 3,57789 | 7,00389 | 0,697018 | 6,37540 | 129,645 | 1 |

07-2013

PLN

RON

SEK

GBP

NOK

ISK

CHF

1 EUR =

4,27455

4,42438

8,66092

0,861924

7,88374

160,318

1,23659

1 BGN =

2,18558

2,26218

4,42833

0,440701

4,03095

81,9705

0,632267

1 CZK =

0,164761

0,170536

0,333833

0,0332226

0,303876

6,17940

0,0476639

1 DKK =

0,573155

0,593245

1,16130

0,115572

1,05710

21,4963

0,165808

1 HRK =

0,569478

0,589439

1,15385

0,114830

1,05031

21,3584

0,164745

1 LVL =

6,08593

6,29926

12,3311

1,22717

11,2246

228,254

1,76060

1 LTL =

1,23799

1,28139

2,50838

0,249630

2,28329

46,4313

0,358140

1 HUF =

0,0144950

0,0150030

0,0293691

0,00292278

0,0267337

0,543637

0,00419326

1 PLN =

1

1,03505

2,02616

0,201641

1,84434

37,5052

0,289291

1 RON =

0,966135

1

1,95755

0,194812

1,78189

36,2351

0,279494

1 SEK =

0,493544

0,510844

1

0,0995187

0,910266

18,5105

0,142778

1 GBP =

4,95931

5,13314

10,0484

1

9,14668

186,000

1,43468

1 NOK =

0,542198

0,561203

1,09858

0,109329

1

20,3353

0,156853

1 ISK =

0,0266630

0,0275975

0,0540234

0,00537634

0,0491757

1

0,00771335

1 CHF =

3,45673

3,57789

7,00389

0,697018

6,37540

129,645

1

Note: all cross rates involving ISK are calculated using ISK/EUR rate data from the Central Bank of Iceland

| reference: Jul-13 | 1 EUR in national currency | 1 unit of N.C. in EUR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BGN | 1,95580 | 0,511300 |
| CZK | 25,9439 | 0,0385447 |
| DKK | 7,45793 | 0,134086 |
| HRK | 7,50609 | 0,133225 |
| LVL | 0,702365 | 1,42376 |
| LTL | 3,45280 | 0,289620 |
| HUF | 294,899 | 0,00339099 |
| PLN | 4,27455 | 0,233943 |
| RON | 4,42438 | 0,226020 |
| SEK | 8,66092 | 0,115461 |
| GBP | 0,861924 | 1,16020 |
| NOK | 7,88374 | 0,126843 |
| ISK | 160,318 | 0,00623761 |
| CHF | 1,23659 | 0,808677 |

reference: Jul-13

1 EUR in national currency

1 unit of N.C. in EUR

BGN

1,95580

0,511300

CZK

25,9439

0,0385447

DKK

7,45793

0,134086

HRK

7,50609

0,133225

LVL

0,702365

1,42376

LTL

3,45280

0,289620

HUF

294,899

0,00339099

PLN

4,27455

0,233943

RON

4,42438

0,226020

SEK

8,66092

0,115461

GBP

0,861924

1,16020

NOK

7,88374

0,126843

ISK

160,318

0,00623761

CHF

1,23659

0,808677

Note: ISK/EUR rates based on data from the Central Bank of Iceland

| 1. | Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 determines that the rate for the conversion into a currency of amounts denominated in another currency shall be the rate calculated by the Commission and based on the monthly average, during the reference period specified in paragraph 2, of reference rates of exchange of currencies published by the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 determines that the rate for the conversion into a currency of amounts denominated in another currency shall be the rate calculated by the Commission and based on the monthly average, during the reference period specified in paragraph 2, of reference rates of exchange of currencies published by the European Central Bank.

| 2. | The reference period shall be:






  — | the month of January for rates of conversion applicable from 1 April following, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The reference period shall be:

—

the month of January for rates of conversion applicable from 1 April following,

| — | the month of April for rates of conversion applicable from 1 July following, |
| --- | --- |

—

the month of April for rates of conversion applicable from 1 July following,

| — | the month of July for rates of conversion applicable from 1 October following, |
| --- | --- |

—

the month of July for rates of conversion applicable from 1 October following,

| — | the month of October for rates of conversion applicable from 1 January following. |
| --- | --- |

—

the month of October for rates of conversion applicable from 1 January following.

The rates for the conversion of currencies shall be published in the second Official Journal of the European Union (C series) of the months of February, May, August and November.

---

V Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/30

---

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

2013/C 228/08

This publication confers the right to oppose the application, pursuant to Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

AMENDMENT APPLICATION

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
   (2)

AMENDMENT APPLICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 9

‘ΚΟΝΣΕΡΒΟΛΙΑ ΡΟΒΙΩΝ’ (KONSERVOLIA ROVION)

EC No: EL-PDO-0117-0974-14.02.2012

PGI ( ) PDO ( X )

1.   Heading in the product specification affected by the amendment

| — |  | Name of product |
| --- | --- | --- |
| — | ☒ | Description of product |
| — |  | Geographical area |
| — | ☒ | Proof of origin |
| — | ☒ | Method of production |
| — |  | Link |
| — |  | Labelling |
| — |  | National requirements |
| — | ☒ | Other (Packaging) |

—



Name of product

—

☒

Description of product

—



Geographical area

—

☒

Proof of origin

—

☒

Method of production

—



Link

—



Labelling

—



National requirements

—

☒

Other (Packaging)

2.   Type of amendment(s)

| — |  | Amendment to single document or summary sheet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| — | ☒ | Amendment to specification of registered PDO or PGI for which neither the single document nor the summary sheet has been published |
| — |  | Amendment to specification that requires no amendment to the published single document (Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) |
| — |  | Temporary amendment to specification resulting from imposition of obligatory sanitary or phytosanitary measures by public authorities (Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) |

—



Amendment to single document or summary sheet

—

☒

Amendment to specification of registered PDO or PGI for which neither the single document nor the summary sheet has been published

—



Amendment to specification that requires no amendment to the published single document (Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)

—



Temporary amendment to specification resulting from imposition of obligatory sanitary or phytosanitary measures by public authorities (Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)

3.   Amendment(s)

This amendment application is part of a general effort being made to support olive growing in the area of Rovies and make ‘Konservolia Rovion’ more competitive so that it can achieve the recognition it deserves at both national and international level.

Specifically, we hereby request the following amendments:

3.1.   Description of product

Market requirements and changing consumer habits have led to the need to diversify the commercial types available on the market. We therefore request that the description of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ be amended to include olives turning colour (‘blonde olives’).

The International Olive Council's trade standard for table olives (COI/OT/NC No 1 of December 2004) provides that the types of table olive placed on the market may include:

| — | olives turning colour: fruits harvested before the stage of complete ripeness is attained, when the colour is changing from green to black. |
| --- | --- |

—

olives turning colour: fruits harvested before the stage of complete ripeness is attained, when the colour is changing from green to black.

Olives turning colour are processed in exactly the same way as ‘Konservolia Rovion’ whole black olives, as regards removal of the bitterness, sorting and presentation for sale.

We therefore believe this amendment should be made as the turning of colour is a natural stage in the ripening of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives from green to black. It will not affect or change the product's link with the geographical area, but will simply facilitate promotion and sale of the product abroad.

The average size of PDO ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives has been changed (from 120-160 to 120-260) to bring it into line with the current situation that has resulted from conversion to organic farming. The International Olive Council's trade standard for table olives (COI/OT/NC No 1 of December 2004), as currently in force, grades olive size according to the number of fruits per kilogram. For ‘Konservolia Rovion’ the size scale, in one kilogram, is as follows:

91/100, 101/110, 111/120, 121/140, 141/160, 161/180, 181/200, 201/230, 231/260, 261/290, 291/320, 321/350.

Market requirements and changing consumer habits have led to the need to diversify the commercial types available on the market. We therefore request that the description of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ be amended to include whole cracked olives, whole pitted olives, halved/quartered olives and sliced olives (i.e. addition of the commercial types (b) to (e) in the relevant section of the updated specification).

The olives used for cracked olives are ‘Konservolia Rovion’ PDO whole olives which have already undergone fermentation and have therefore acquired their final physical and chemical and organoleptic characteristics. According to the International Olive Council's trade standard for table olives (COI/OT/NC No 1 of December 2004), cracked olives are olives that are cracked lengthwise, without breaking the stone (pit), which remains intact inside the fruit. This is done with a special cracking machine. The olives are then placed in a 7-10 % brine solution, as appropriate, exactly like ‘Konservolia Rovion’ PDO whole olives. Thus the characteristics of the cracked olives (taste, colour, smell) do not differ in any way from those of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ PDO whole olives, as the cracking takes place once the olive has acquired its final organoleptic characteristics. Furthermore, the composition of the brine, which can generally change a product's taste, is exactly the same for the whole olives and the cracked ones.

Exactly the same method is used when the ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives are pitted or cut into halves/quarters or slices and therefore the product's link with the geographical area does not change.

Pitted olives: the stone is removed with a special pitting machine, always through the major axis of the fruit.

The halved/quartered and sliced olives are ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives that have first been pitted. They are cut into halves/quarters or slices with special machines.

The information on the colours of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ PDO olives has also been updated.

3.2.   Proof of origin

Market requirements regarding traceability of foodstuffs and the need to protect the product from adulteration have led to the adoption of a stricter system which will safeguard the product's identity and ensure consistent quality in the future.

3.3.   Method of production

As a result of the development of organic farming since the year 2000 (70 % of olive groves planted with ‘Konservolia Rovion’ are now organically farmed) and the conversion of a substantial part of olive production to organic, caustic soda may no longer be used to remove the bitterness from the fruit. Instead, the bitterness is removed from organic olives in the traditional natural way, i.e. in tanks filled with a solution of sodium chloride. Until they are consumed, the olives are preserved in a 7-10 % brine solution. This is assisted by the acidity that develops when organic acids are produced by the lactic fermentation that takes place when the containers are closed. It is therefore requested that the specification for PDO ‘Konservolia Rovion’ be amended to include this natural fermentation method.

In more detail, the bitterness is removed as follows:

| 1. | for green olives, olives turning colour and black olives that fully meet organic standards and for conventional olives turning colour and conventional black olives, by using the traditional natural method, i.e. in containers filled with a solution of sodium chloride (brine). The olives are preserved until they are consumed by being kept in a 7-10 % acidified brine solution. This is assisted by the acidity that develops when organic acids are produced by the lactic fermentation that takes place when the containers are closed. The removal of bitterness takes approximately 4-6 months depending on the temperature; |
| --- | --- |

1.

for green olives, olives turning colour and black olives that fully meet organic standards and for conventional olives turning colour and conventional black olives, by using the traditional natural method, i.e. in containers filled with a solution of sodium chloride (brine). The olives are preserved until they are consumed by being kept in a 7-10 % acidified brine solution. This is assisted by the acidity that develops when organic acids are produced by the lactic fermentation that takes place when the containers are closed. The removal of bitterness takes approximately 4-6 months depending on the temperature;

| 2. | by using a 2 % caustic soda solution, only for conventional green olives. The removal of bitterness takes approximately 12 hours, depending on the temperature. The olives are then washed in plenty of water (three changes of water) for 24 hours. They are then put in tubs of brine (approximately 8 Baume), where lactobacilli cause them to ferment. After fermentation they are left to mature in the same brine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

by using a 2 % caustic soda solution, only for conventional green olives. The removal of bitterness takes approximately 12 hours, depending on the temperature. The olives are then washed in plenty of water (three changes of water) for 24 hours. They are then put in tubs of brine (approximately 8 Baume), where lactobacilli cause them to ferment. After fermentation they are left to mature in the same brine.

It is also requested that the use of organic fertilisers be included in the specification, because of organic farming.

Finally, the times of harvesting, which are based on the colour of the PDO ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives, have been updated because a new type has been introduced (‘blonde olives’).

3.4.   Packaging

In view of technological developments and continually evolving consumer demands, it is requested that the packaging size restrictions be removed so that ‘Konservolia Rovion’ may be packaged in any packaging that meets the requirements of Greek and EU legislation. This will make the product easier to trade and more competitive. The size of the packaging does not affect the specific characteristics of the product.

Declaration of legitimate interest

The Rovies Agricultural Cooperative is located within the defined geographical area and currently produces and processes all the ‘Konservolia Rovion’. This Cooperative submitted the initial application for registration of the name ‘Konservolia Rovion’ in the EU's PDO-PGI register.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
   (3)

‘ΚΟΝΣΕΡΒΟΛΙΑ ΡΟΒΙΩΝ’ (KONSERVOLIA ROVION)

EC No: EL-PDO-0117-0974-14.02.2012

PGI ( ) PDO ( X )

1.   Name

‘Κονσερβολιά Ροβιών’ (Konservolia Rovion)

2.   Member State or third country

Greece

3.   Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff

3.1.   Type of product

| Class 1.6. | Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed |
| --- | --- |

Class 1.6.

Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

3.2.   Description of product to which the name in point 1 applies

The fruit is firm, crunchy and rich in sugars. The ripe (black) olive has an average oil content of 17-18 %.

The quality characteristics of the final product are as follows:

| — | medium sized (average 120-260 pieces/kg). The International Olive Council's trade standard for table olives (COI/OT/NC No 1 of December 2004), as currently in force, grades olive size according to the number of fruits per kilogram. For ‘Konservolia Rovion’ the size scale is as follows:
  91/100, 101/110, 111/120, 121/140, 141/160, 161/180, 181/200, 201/230, 231/260, 261/290, 291/320, 321/350, |
| --- | --- |

—

medium sized (average 120-260 pieces/kg). The International Olive Council's trade standard for table olives (COI/OT/NC No 1 of December 2004), as currently in force, grades olive size according to the number of fruits per kilogram. For ‘Konservolia Rovion’ the size scale is as follows:

91/100, 101/110, 111/120, 121/140, 141/160, 161/180, 181/200, 201/230, 231/260, 261/290, 291/320, 321/350,

| — | green olives: long-lasting colour ranging from yellowish-green to dark green. Olives turning colour: colour ranging from light green and yellow to light shades of brown. Black olives: colour ranging from light to dark brown and dark purple, |
| --- | --- |

—

green olives: long-lasting colour ranging from yellowish-green to dark green. Olives turning colour: colour ranging from light green and yellow to light shades of brown. Black olives: colour ranging from light to dark brown and dark purple,

| — | crunchy, tasty flesh, with a characteristic aroma of olive oil, |
| --- | --- |

—

crunchy, tasty flesh, with a characteristic aroma of olive oil,

| — | a high sugar content with a long-lasting fruity taste, |
| --- | --- |

—

a high sugar content with a long-lasting fruity taste,

| — | highly resistant to other forms of alteration. |
| --- | --- |

—

highly resistant to other forms of alteration.

The green olives are ‘ripe’ for harvesting from the beginning of September, earlier than any other variety of olive in any other area of Greece.

There are three types available: green olives, olives turning colour (‘blonde olives’) and black olives.

The product is marketed in the following styles:

| A. | whole; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whole;

| B. | pitted; |
| --- | --- |

B.

pitted;

| C. | halved/quartered; |
| --- | --- |

C.

halved/quartered;

| D. | sliced; |
| --- | --- |

D.

sliced;

| E. | cracked. |
| --- | --- |

E.

cracked.

The olives may be packed in oil or brine and traditional herbs, spices or almond kernels, etc. may be added.

3.3.   Raw materials (for processed products only)

‘Konservolia Rovion’ is obtained solely by the processing of the Konservolia variety of table olive.

3.4.   Feed (for products of animal origin only)

—

3.5.   Specific steps in production that must take place in the defined geographical area

‘Konservolia Rovion’ must be grown and processed within the defined geographical area.

3.6.   Specific rules concerning slicing, grating, packaging, etc.

—

3.7.   Specific rules concerning labelling

—

4.   Concise definition of the geographical area

The area defined by the administrative boundaries of Rovies in the prefecture of Evia, including all settlements. ‘Konservolia Rovion’ must be grown and processed within this area.

5.   Link with the geographical area

5.1.   Specificity of the geographical area

Climate

The natural environment helps to give ‘Konservolia Rovion’ its excellent characteristics. The area has a mild, Mediterranean climate, with no frosts (extremely rare) and long hours of sunshine. The winds are usually north-north-easterly. In addition, however, there are often south-south-westerly winds (boukadoura — local wind) which also help create the area's microclimate.

The olive grove is south-facing and protected from cold north-north-easterly winds by Mount Telethrio and Mount Xiro, which are richly forested.

The cool air currents from these forested mountains and the sea breeze from the other side of the geographical area on hot summer days keep temperatures mild during the summer.

Average rainfall is around 550 mm, falling mostly in autumn and winter (November to March). The olive grove's main aquifer is fed by the waters of the Gerania stream.

Soil

The soil in the olive grove is of average mechanical composition, well drained, fertile and generally contains sufficient calcium.

Human factors

The contribution of the producers is equally important in shaping the final product. This comes from their long-standing experience of olive growing, their use of special cultivation techniques to produce fruit of the right quality, and their consistent interest in producing and safeguarding a special product. More specifically, the cultivation practices include: (a) pruning, which is done to encourage new growth and ensure that the trees are exposed to ample light and are well aired; (b) systematic irrigation of the trees to protect them from distress caused by lack of water and; (c) harvesting by hand to obtain top quality olives and ensure successful processing. Finally, there is the processing unit, where the quality selection and filling is done by hand, guaranteeing a top quality final product, and where traditional practices and processing techniques are combined to ensure that any problems that could arise during fermentation can be overcome. Thus the organoleptic characteristics of the olives remain unaltered and a unique product is obtained.

5.2.   Specificity of the product

‘Konservolia Rovion’ is obtained solely by the processing of the Konservolia variety of table olive.

The fruit is firm and of medium size (120-260 fruits/kilo). The colour is long-lasting and ranges from yellowish-green to dark green for green olives, from light green and yellow to light shades of brown for olives turning colour and from light brown to dark brown and dark purple for black olives, and the flesh is crunchy, tasty and has a characteristic aroma of olive oil. The olives have a high sugar content with a long-lasting fruity taste and are highly resistant to other forms of alteration.

Another specific characteristic of ‘Konservolia Rovion’ is that it is harvested very early. It is said to be the very first olive harvested in Greece today.

5.3.   Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI)

The specific characteristics of the product and early harvesting are due to the techniques used for growing and processing the olives and the area's natural environment and particular microclimate (the nearby forests, southern exposure, protection from northerly winds, local winds, temperature, cool night wind, rainfall, aquifer, etc.).

More specifically:

| 1. | The distinct Konservolia olive variety, which in the Rovies area produces Greece's earliest table olive. Grafts of the best strains of Konservolia were used as parent material for the Papadopoulos olive grove (which was compact and irrigated, with the trees planted in straight lines) and later on for all the olive trees in Rovies. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distinct Konservolia olive variety, which in the Rovies area produces Greece's earliest table olive. Grafts of the best strains of Konservolia were used as parent material for the Papadopoulos olive grove (which was compact and irrigated, with the trees planted in straight lines) and later on for all the olive trees in Rovies.

| 2. | The unique climatic conditions in the olive groves in the defined geographical area, and more specifically:






  — | the fact that the olive grove is south-facing (long hours of sunshine) and protected from north-north-easterly winds by Mount Telethrio and Mount Xiro contributes to early cropping, proper flowering and a high sugar content conducive to fast, successful fermentation. The long hours of sunshine and the fact that temperatures are mild during the winter because the area is protected from north-north-easterly winds and the frequent south-south-westerly winds (boukadoura — local wind) mean that the area receives ample light and there are no major fluctuations in temperature, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The unique climatic conditions in the olive groves in the defined geographical area, and more specifically:

—

the fact that the olive grove is south-facing (long hours of sunshine) and protected from north-north-easterly winds by Mount Telethrio and Mount Xiro contributes to early cropping, proper flowering and a high sugar content conducive to fast, successful fermentation. The long hours of sunshine and the fact that temperatures are mild during the winter because the area is protected from north-north-easterly winds and the frequent south-south-westerly winds (boukadoura — local wind) mean that the area receives ample light and there are no major fluctuations in temperature,

| — | the cool air currents from these forested mountains and the sea breeze from the other side of the defined area on hot summer days help create a microclimate, which gives ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives their special quality characteristics. More specifically, the cool air currents and the sea breeze keep temperatures mild during the summer, with no major fluctuations.
  This microclimate produces early fruit (quick, successful fermentation because of the high sugar content), with a bright green colour and compact texture (firm, crunchy) and favours the development of aromatic substances, |
| --- | --- |

—

the cool air currents from these forested mountains and the sea breeze from the other side of the defined area on hot summer days help create a microclimate, which gives ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives their special quality characteristics. More specifically, the cool air currents and the sea breeze keep temperatures mild during the summer, with no major fluctuations.

This microclimate produces early fruit (quick, successful fermentation because of the high sugar content), with a bright green colour and compact texture (firm, crunchy) and favours the development of aromatic substances,

| — | average rainfall is around 550 mm, falling mostly in autumn and winter (November to March). The olive grove's main aquifer is fed by the waters of the Gerania stream. The rains contribute to the proper flowering of the olive trees, successful pollination and proper fruiting, and help ensure that the olives are of the right shape, |
| --- | --- |

—

average rainfall is around 550 mm, falling mostly in autumn and winter (November to March). The olive grove's main aquifer is fed by the waters of the Gerania stream. The rains contribute to the proper flowering of the olive trees, successful pollination and proper fruiting, and help ensure that the olives are of the right shape,

| — | the winds are usually north-north-easterly but they are mitigated by Mount Telethrio and Mount Xiro. The presence of moderate winds contributes to proper flowering and proper ripening of the fruit, |
| --- | --- |

—

the winds are usually north-north-easterly but they are mitigated by Mount Telethrio and Mount Xiro. The presence of moderate winds contributes to proper flowering and proper ripening of the fruit,

| — | the soil in the olive grove is of average mechanical composition, well drained, fertile and generally contains sufficient calcium. Because of the calcium content the olives are rich in volatile substances, which give them their long-lasting fruity taste and aroma, and their compact texture. |
| --- | --- |

—

the soil in the olive grove is of average mechanical composition, well drained, fertile and generally contains sufficient calcium. Because of the calcium content the olives are rich in volatile substances, which give them their long-lasting fruity taste and aroma, and their compact texture.

| 3. | The combination of olive-growing techniques, harvesting and processing, and more specifically: | The harvesting of the green olives begins earlier than in any other area of Greece, from the beginning of September (the major part), and ends around the end of October. Quantities of ‘blonde olives’ (of the same variety) and black olives (also of the same variety) are also gathered and sold, mainly on the Greek market, in October and November respectively. |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

The combination of olive-growing techniques, harvesting and processing, and more specifically:

The harvesting of the green olives begins earlier than in any other area of Greece, from the beginning of September (the major part), and ends around the end of October. Quantities of ‘blonde olives’ (of the same variety) and black olives (also of the same variety) are also gathered and sold, mainly on the Greek market, in October and November respectively.

| | ‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives are harvested individually by hand, using ladders, so there will be no bruising or ‘browning’ of the colour. They are transported on the same day, delivered, weighed and then processing begins immediately. Besides the good physiological characteristics and early harvesting of ‘Konservolia Rovion’, the relatively high temperatures in September-October help to ensure that the removal of bitterness, fermentation and ripening progress quickly and the fruit does not become soft. |
| --- | --- |

‘Konservolia Rovion’ olives are harvested individually by hand, using ladders, so there will be no bruising or ‘browning’ of the colour. They are transported on the same day, delivered, weighed and then processing begins immediately. Besides the good physiological characteristics and early harvesting of ‘Konservolia Rovion’, the relatively high temperatures in September-October help to ensure that the removal of bitterness, fermentation and ripening progress quickly and the fruit does not become soft.

| 4. | The tradition of growing ‘Konservolia Rovion’, which goes back to 1928 when planting of the Papadopoulos olive grove began, and the fact that olive growing has become an integral part of daily life in the community of Rovies.
  ‘Konservolia Rovion’ comes from the long-established, well-known Papadopoulos farm. Planting of the Papadopoulos olive grove began around 1920 and was completed in 1938. It covers most of the flat agricultural land within the administrative boundaries of Rovies.
  In 1974 and 1981, the Papadopoulos olive grove was voluntarily divided into large parcels averaging 40 stremmata (40 000 m2) or more, which were shared out between a large number of olive growers in the community of Rovies. It is generally said that the Rovies olive grove is Evia's best cultivated olive grove in every way and in earlier times the Papadopoulos farm was regarded as a ‘model’ olive grove nationwide. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The tradition of growing ‘Konservolia Rovion’, which goes back to 1928 when planting of the Papadopoulos olive grove began, and the fact that olive growing has become an integral part of daily life in the community of Rovies.

‘Konservolia Rovion’ comes from the long-established, well-known Papadopoulos farm. Planting of the Papadopoulos olive grove began around 1920 and was completed in 1938. It covers most of the flat agricultural land within the administrative boundaries of Rovies.

In 1974 and 1981, the Papadopoulos olive grove was voluntarily divided into large parcels averaging 40 stremmata (40 000 m2) or more, which were shared out between a large number of olive growers in the community of Rovies. It is generally said that the Rovies olive grove is Evia's best cultivated olive grove in every way and in earlier times the Papadopoulos farm was regarded as a ‘model’ olive grove nationwide.

Publication reference of the specification

(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (4))

http://www.minagric.gr/images/stories/docs/agrotis/POP-PGE/prodiagrafes_konserbopoils_robion150313.pdf

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Replaced by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.

(3)  See footnote 2.

(4)  See footnote 2.

---