alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,555-02

EX PARTE LARRY JOSEPH TILLMAN, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1059831-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life imprisonment. His case was affirmed by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in

Tillman v. State, No. 14-08-00846-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 27, 2010). On

October 5, 2011, this Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. 

On July 24, 2012, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed Applicant’s conviction on remand. 

Applicant contends that counsel failed to notify him that the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
2

affirmed his conviction on remand. Applicant contends he was denied the opportunity to file a

second petition for discretionary review (PDR). 

Counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court stating that his file is incomplete due to an

officemove and does not reflect if and when Applicant was notified of the appellate court’s decision. 

Counsel also states that he notified the Fourteenth Court of Appeals that he would be filing a second

PDR, but was informed that Applicant would be appointed new counsel. Applicant was not

appointed new counsel. 

The trial court made no recommendation. We conclude that there was a breakdown in the

system. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the

judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00846-CR that affirmed his

conviction in Cause No. 1059831 from the 262nd District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall

file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: May 25, 2016

Do not publish
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 238 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in certain 

areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro 

Rail project, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. WAXMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for 

tunneling in certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail project, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION. 

4 The second sentence of section 321 of the Depart5 ment of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropria6 tions Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 1287) is repealed. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 21.7674 Measurement of practical training courses. ( a ) *Nursing courses.* ( 1 ) Courses for the objective of registered nurse or registered professional nurse will be measured on the basis of credit hours or clock hours of attendance, whichever is appropriate. The clock hours of attendance may include academic class time, clinical training, and supervised study periods.
( 2 ) Courses offered by institutions of higher learning which lead to the objective of practical nurse, practical trained nurse, or licensed practical nurse will be measured on credit hours or clock hours of attendance per week whichever is appropriate. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3688; Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Medical and dental assistants courses for VA.* Programs approved in accordance with the provisions of § 21.7720(b)(9) will be measured on a clock-hour basis as provided in § 21.7672. However, the program will be regarded as full-time institutional training, provided the combined total of the classroom and other formal instruction portion of the program and the on-the-job portion of the program requires 30 or more clock hours of attendance per week. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3688; Pub. L. 98-525)
( c ) *Other practical training courses.* These courses will be measured in semester hours of credit or clock hours of attendance per week, whichever is appropriate.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b) 38 U.S.C. 3688; Pub. L. 98-525
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 29310, June 10, 1996]
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Bernard ZimmermanName: Bernard Zimmerman
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 29, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4
                                                                    ------------

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                  1991 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

     Section VIII(b) of the Kent Electronics Corporation 1991 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan shall be amended in its entirety to provide for
transferability of stock options as follows:

     (b) Except as set forth below, a Stock Option granted hereunder shall not
     be transferable by the Participant otherwise than by will or operation of
     the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic
     relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of the Employee
     Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules
     thereunder; provided, however, that the Stock Option may be transferable,
     without payment of consideration, to immediate family members of the
     Participant or to trusts or partnerships for such family members.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   November 5, 2004



/s/ Ingrid Wiik_______
Ingrid Wiik
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 4, 2004



/s/ Matthew Farrell_____
Matthew Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      _____________, 2006





By: /s/
      Daniel Bernstein


Daniel
      Bernstein, President


and
      Chief
      Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

JUNE, 1900.

#### Henry Krieger, Respondent, *v.*Charles Kaye et al., Appellants.

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

Samuel Greenbaum, for appellants.

Alfred Steckler, for respondent.

*Per Guriam.*

No appeal lies to this court from an order of the City Court denying a motion for a new trial, so that the facts of the case cannot be reviewed here. All that we can consider is the exception to the rulings of the Trial Court. None of these, however, presents sufficient ground for reversing the judgment. The evidence given by the witnesses Cohen and Strauss was, we thiffk, admissible in corroboration of the plaintiff’s claim that he had a contract of employment with them for a year at the time he entered upon his negotiations with the defendants, which as he testifies, and as the jury has found, resulted in the making of the contract in suit. That such an agreement as the one above referred to with Cohen and Strauss had been actually made was a ■circumstance which the jury was entitled to consider in its hearing upon the probability of the plaintiff’s testimony, for it legiti*776mately suggested the inquiry whether it was likely that the plaintiff would have thrown it up, as he did, without securing from the defendants the concession which he claims they made. The discussion contained in the opinions of the learned judges, who wrote in the case of Bronner v. Frauenthal, 37 N. Y. 166, indicates, we think, the principle which applies to the case at bar.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gieoebich and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2021-B23 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; KeyBank National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.



Date:  March 28, 2024

/s/ Richard Simpson___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Benchmark 2021-B23 Certifications


---
§ 17.644 Selection of participants. ( a ) *Selection criteria.* In evaluating and selecting participants, VA will consider the following factors: ( 1 ) The applicant meets all of the eligibility criteria in § 17.642 and has submitted a complete application under § 17.643;
( 2 ) The strength of the applicant's letters of reference;
( 3 ) The applicant is in good to excellent standing in the residency program, as determined from the Program Director letter of reference;
( 4 ) The applicant demonstrates a strong commitment to VA's mission and core values;
( 5 ) The applicant has personal career goals that match VA needs (*i.e.*, to work with patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, substance abuse, or post-traumatic stress disorder);
( 6 ) The applicant's expresses a desire to work at a location that matches with VA needs; and
( 7 ) The applicant does not have any identifiable circumstances relating to education, training, licensure, certification and review of health status, previous experience, clinical privileges, professional references, malpractice history and adverse actions, or criminal violations that would adversely affect the applicant's credentialing process.
( b ) *Selection.* VA will select not less than 10 individuals who meet the requirements of this section to participate in the program for the repayment of educational loans for each year in which VA carries out the program.
( c ) *Notification of selection.* VA will notify applicants that they have been selected in writing. An individual becomes a participant in the PREL once the participant submits and VA signs the acceptance of conditions.
[81 FR 66820, Sept. 29, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 4796, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### § 48.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin
Goddard, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: February 3, 2004                    /s/ Colin Goddard, Ph.D.
      ----------------                    ------------------------------------
                                          Colin Goddard, Ph.D.
                                          Chief Executive Officer




                                       33
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Saudi Arabia

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Saudi Arabia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia

During the review period, the government made some, but not all, budget documents publicly available online.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available online.  The limited data available in the government’s annual budget statement broke down expenditures by category, but not by ministry or agency.  Some significant, large state-owned enterprises did not have publicly available audited financial statements.  The annual budget statement did not show allocations to the royal family or Council of Ministers, and the government maintained off-budget accounts not subject to public oversight.  Deviations from planned expenditures and revenues were disclosed.  The supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence, but its reports were not publicly available.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were specified in law and regulation and appeared to be followed in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not consistently made publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund disclosed its source of funding, and general approach to withdrawals. Saudi Arabia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- publishing expenditures by ministry or agency in the budget;
- making publicly available detailed and complete budget documents;
- ensuring audit reports for significant, large state-owned enterprises are publicly available;
- making audit reports of the government’s executed budget widely and easily accessible to the public within a reasonable period of time; and
- make basic information on natural resource awards consistently available to the public.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Saudi Arabia 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSaudi Arabia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# Official Journal C 106/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 106 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5010 May 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 106

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5010 May 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 106/01 | List of quality wines produced in specified regions (Published pursuant to Article 54 (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 106/01

List of quality wines produced in specified regions (Published pursuant to Article 54 (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Petition of

-- ) ) First Division Design, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. FA5270-l3-P-O 177 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE PETITIONER: ASBCA No. 60884-975

Mr. Craig F. Pierce

Manager/Member APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. Air Force Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney Phillip E. Reiman, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDERPURSUANT TO RULE l(a)(5) DIRECTING CONTRACTING OFFICERTO ISSUE DECISION The contractor filed, under Rule l(a)(5), a request for an order directing the contracting officerto render a decision on the contractor's settlement proposal and claim. The government has advised that a final decision will be issued by 19 December 2016. We deem this date reasonable. This Order completes all necessary action by the Board. Dated: 15 December 2016

(Signatures continued) 

### r MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

# ~ACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

# -~h- PERD.TING Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals 

# s

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order Pursuant to Rule l(a)(5) ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA 60884-975, Petition of First Division Design, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 32.1

PRESIDENT CERTIFICATION

I,
Richard T. Miller, certify that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TCW Direct Lending
VIII LLC; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2022 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard T. Miller        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Richard T. Miller            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2013241EN.01S00302.xml

| 10.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---