alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. CAAP-23-0000431
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I DANIEL M. SANDOMIRE; KATY YEN-JU CHEN; TRUDI MELOHN, individually and as Co-Trustee under the William Charles Melohn III Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010 and Co-Trustee under the Trudi Melohn Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010; and WILLIAM CHARLES MELOHN III, individually and as Co-Trustee under the William Charles Melohn III Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010 and Co-Trustee under the Trudi Melohn Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DAVID EDWARD BROWN and LANHUA KAO BROWN,

Defendants-Appellants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC151002267)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, and McCullen and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed on April 3, 2024, by Defendants-Appellants David Edward Brown and Lanhua Kao Brown ( Appellants ) , it appears that:

(1) Appellants move for reconsideration of the March 25, 2025 Order denying the February 5, 2024 "2nd Motion to Stay A) Final Judgment [ROA 499] and All Related Orders Including: B) Garnishee Summons October 20, 2023 [CC DKT 543, Exhibit 1] C) the 'Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs,' March 16, 2023; [ROA 450]; D) Garnishee Order, December 15, 2023 [CC DKT 561, Exhibit 2]; E) 2nd Garnishee Order, January 30, 2024,[CC DKT 575; Exhibit 3]," as well as the February 9, 2024 motion with the same title. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000431 25-APR-2024 08:34 AM Dkt. 109 ODMR(2) The motion for reconsideration presents no point

of law or fact that this court overlooked or misapprehended. See Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 25, 2024.
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Presiding Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# Time and Place:

 Tuesday, September 29, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Item:

 PEFCO Secured Note Issues Resolutions.

# Public Participation:

 The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# Further Information:

 For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 202-565-3957).

Jonathan J. Cordone,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-23431 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135178 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135178 COA: 268695 Wayne CC: 05-007563-01 JOHN EARL PARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
#### § 19.38 Action by agency of original jurisdiction when remand received.

When a case is remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals, the agency of original jurisdiction will complete the additional development of the evidence or procedural development required. Following completion of the development, the case will be reviewed to determine whether the additional development, together with the evidence which was previously of record, supports the allowance of all benefits sought on appeal. If so, the appellant and his or her representative, if any, will be promptly informed. If any benefits sought on appeal remain denied following this review, the agency of original jurisdiction will issue a Supplemental Statement of the Case concerning the additional development pertaining to those issues in accordance with the provisions of § 19.31 of this part. Following the 30-day period allowed for a response to the Supplemental Statement of the Case pursuant to § 19.52(c), the case will be returned to the Board for further appellate processing unless the appeal is withdrawn or review of the response to the Supplemental Statement of the Case results in the allowance of all benefits sought on appeal. Remanded cases will not be closed for failure to respond to the Supplemental Statement of the Case.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105(d)(1) (2016))

[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 69 FR 53808, Sept. 3, 2004; 73 FR 40748, July 16, 2008; 84 FR 179, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### § 21.7150 Pursuit.

Except for a veteran or servicemember seeking tuition assistance top-up or reimbursement for taking an approved licensing or certification test, the veteran's or servicemember's educational assistance depends upon his or her pursuit of a program of education. Verification of this pursuit is accomplished by various certifications.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(b))

[53 FR 1757, Jan. 22, 1988, as amended at 72 FR 16982, Apr. 5, 2007]
### Swanson, Brian (OST)
From: 

### Sent: ·· To: 

### Subject:

Good Morning Brian, Paul Cullen <Paui.Cullen@ascensus.com> Monday, August 13, 2012 10:33 AM Swanson, Brian (OST) SkyWest
- Yes

I usually don't do emails like this, but Ijustwanted to put in my two cents. I have moved up to the Brainerd area from the Twin Cities. I use the Brainerd Airport often for traveling forwork. At all opportunities Ifly in and out of Brainerd. Also, we have many friends and family that fly up to Minnesota multiple times a year. They tryto fly in and out of Brainerd ifthey can. Ithink itwould be importantto stick with an Air Carrier that would accommodate bathrooms, convenience, and flexibility to keep people flying in and out of Brainerd.(i.e. SkyWest)
I knowfrom a convenience standpoint, ifa carrier from Brainerd to MSP required to go through security and switch from HH to MSP International, then all convenience and time efficiency is lost. Ifthis would be the case many colleague travelers and myselfwould just choose to drive down to MSP and fly in and out ofthere.
Please choose SkyWest to keep the Brainerd Airport alive and to accommodate business and vacation travelers in and out ofthe Brainerd Area!
Thank You! Paul
Paul 

### J. Cullen, CISP Ascensus; ERISA Consultant Phone: (218) 825-5035 Fax: (218) 825-5011 Email: paul.cullen@ascensus.com Visit us on the web at www.ascensus.com People Matter. Quality First. IntegrityAlways. 5M 

### CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended to be viewed onlybythe listed recipient(s). It

### may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution orcopying ofthis message is strictly prohibited without ourprior written permission. Ifyou are not an intendedrecipient, orifyou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediatelybyreturn e-mail and permanentlyremove the original message and any copies from your computer and all back-up systems.

1
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, David Viney, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A. as indenture trustee of the issuing entity.








/s/ David VineyDavid VineyVice President and Treasurer (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-AMarch 21, 2024
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 656/2005

of 28 April 2005         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 29 APRIL 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(2)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
     (Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                              0000731727
<NAME>                                             Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     Dec-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Aug-31-1998
<CASH>                                                           2,365
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  743,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                     23,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               770,011
<PP&E>                                                       3,334,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (1,347,806)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              17,303,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          715,872
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                    44,665,687
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (30,078,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                17,303,199
<SALES>                                                         99,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                99,857
<CGS>                                                          118,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  118,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             3,147,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (3,166,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (3,166,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        
 

</TABLE>
|   | (i) | the      quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      September 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      5, 2008 |   |   | /s/PHILLIP A.      KAGEL                                 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |   | Phillip      A. Kagel                                    |
|                                    |   |   | Vice      President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    |   |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)         |
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      August 9, 2006




By:
            /s/ Daniel
              BernsteinDaniel
                Bernstein, President
              and
                Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2309 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2309

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the ``Frank G. Lumpkin, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2007

 Mr. Westmoreland (for himself, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. 
Kingston, Mr. Linder, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. 
   Barrow, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Scott of 
 Georgia, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Terry, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Cantor, 
   Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. Pence, Ms. Foxx, and Mr. Mica) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the ``Frank G. Lumpkin, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRANK G. LUMPKIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank G. 
Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
41782.

#### BROWN v. THE STATE.

Submitted February 8, 1966

Decided February 11, 1966.

*Sullivan, Herndon & Smith, John J. Sullivan,*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Robert E. Barker,*for appellee.

Deen, Judge.

1. “The determination of the credibility of the witnesses is so exclusively within the province of the jury that the verdict finding a defendant guilty is not affected by the fact that the- verdict is supported by the testimony of only one witness, whose testimony is directly in conflict with a large number of witnesses who had equal opportunity of knowing the facts, and who, so far as appears from the record, are worthy of credit.” *Jolly v. State,*5 Ga. App. 454 (63 SE 520).

2. The sole witness for the State testified that she was attacked and knocked to the ground by two persons of whom the defendant was one, that there was a street light directly above her, and that she had a good look at the defendant’s face as he bent over to look at her. She later picked out the defendant from among six men in a police line-up, and again identified him on the trial of the case. Indubitably, whether or not she was dazed and confused at the time she was first interviewed by police officers after the robbery, contrary to her testimony on the trial, and whether under these circumstances her eyewitness identification should be accepted as true, are questions which address themselves solely to the jury.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
§ 64.4 RVCP grants—general. ( a ) VA will award five RVCP grants to eligible entities as defined in § 64.2.
( b ) An eligible entity may receive only one RVCP grant, and only one RVCP grant will be awarded in any one pilot project location (see § 64.12(a)(6)).
( c ) RVCP grants will be awarded for a maximum period of 2 years, beginning on the date on which the RVCP grants are awarded. They will not be extended or renewable.
( d ) A grantee will not be required to provide matching funds as a condition of receiving an RVCP grant.
( e ) No participant will be charged a fee for services provided by the grantee or be required to participate in other activities sponsored by the grantee as a condition of receiving services for which the RVCP grant is made.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 523 note)