alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FSanJoaquin*Valley4AIRPOLLUTIONCOHTROLOlSTRlCTJ.StwanWorthley,ChairSupervisor.TulereCountyAnnJohnston,ViceChairMayor,CityofStocktonTonyBarhaSupwim,KiiCountyJudithO.CaseSupervisor,FrsrnmCountyRonnDomlnicisu#ervirer,MrdsraCountyHenryJayForman,Ph.D.AppointedbyGovernorRandyMillerMayor,ChyofTsHWilllam@BrianSupenrbor,StanirlaurCountyLMOYOtnelllSSupervisor.SanJoaqlrinCountyChrisVierraMayor.CityofCermHubWalshSupervisor,betlCountyRaymondA.WatsonSupenrhr,KamCwntyVacantSdCityRepresentativa,RngrCountyVacantLergeCityReprasentativa,T.&ICi,mVacantAppintndbyGovsrnerSeysdSadredinExecutiveDirectorAkPoUutjPRCantrolOfficerNorthRqjonOffice48M1EmerprissWayMOW%CA96358-8718(2001557-8400FAX(2091557-6475CentralRepimOffice1990EastG~(tvsbureAvmmFresnaCA837ZE0244155912304000FAX15591230-6081DATE:June16,2011TO:SJVUAPCDGoverningBoarFROM:SeyedSadredin,ExecutiveProjectCoordinator:ErrolVillegasRE:ADOPT PROPOSED AMENDMENTSTORULE4401/STEAM-ENHANCED CRUDEOILPRODUCTIONWELLS)RECOMMENDATION:AdoptProposedAmendmentstoRule4401(Steam-EnhancedCrudeOilProductionWells).Authorize the Chairtosigntheattached ResolutionBACKGROUND:IncontinuingeffortstoreduceemissionsfromstationarysourcesintheValley,yourBoardadoptedamendmentstoRule4401(SteamEnhancedCrudeOilProductionWellVents)onDecember14,2006.TheadoptedamendmentssatisfiedcommitmentsintheDistrict2004ExtremeOzoneAttainmentDemonstrationPlan(EOADP)andintheDistrict2003and2006PMIOPlans.Afteradoption,therulewassubmittedtotheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)forevaluationandinclusionintotheStateImplementationPlan(SIP).OnJuly17,2009,EPAevaluated Rule 4401 for approval into theSIP.EPA determinedthatRule 4401 satisfied Reasonably AvailableControl Technology (RACT) requirements for steam-enhanced crudeoil production wells. However, EPA expressed concern with languageinSection6.2regardingtheprocessforapproving alternative testingrequirementsanddid notfully approve therulebased on this concern.Today's recommendations will revise rule language to addressEPA'sconcernandendthe18-month sanction clock associate with theiraction.SauthemRagionOffice34848FlyoverCourtBakenfii,CA93308872618811392-5500FAXM81)382.5585
#### § 17.252 Ex officio member of subcommittee.

The Assistant Chief Medical Director for Academic Affairs shall be an ex officio member of the Subcommittee on Academic Affairs.

[42 FR 54804, Oct. 11, 1977. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
§ 18.437 Nonacademic services. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Elementary, secondary, and adult education programs that receive Federal financial assistance shall provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in a manner which gives handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation in these services and activities.
( 2 ) Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include counseling services, physical recreational athletics, transportation, health services, recreational activities, special interest groups or clubs sponsored by the recipient, referrals to agencies which provide assistance to handicapped persons, and employment of students, including both employment by the recipient and assistance in making available outside employment.
( b ) *Counseling services.* Elementary, secondary, and adult education programs that receive Federal financial assistance and that provide personal, academic, or vocational counseling, guidance, or placement services to their students shall provide these services without discrimination on the basis of handicap and shall ensure that qualified handicapped students are not counseled toward more restrictive career objectives than are nonhandicapped students with similar interests and abilities.
( c ) *Physical education and athletics.* ( 1 ) In providing physical education courses and athletics and similar aid, benefits, or services to any of its students, an elementary, secondary, or adult education program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance may not discriminate on the basis of handicap. A recipient that offers physical education courses or that operates or sponsors interscholastic, club, or intramural activities shall provide to qualified handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation.
( 2 ) A recipient may offer to handicapped students physical education and athletic activities that are separate or different from those offered to nonhandicapped students only if separation or differentiation is consistent with the requirements of § 18.434 and only if no qualified handicapped student is denied the opportunity to compete for teams or to participate in courses that are not separate or different.
[45 FR 63268, Sept. 24, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51370, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### Allie Bruid, Respondent, *v.*Henry W. McVickar et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Flew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

Kellogg, Rose *&*Smith, for appellants.

FToah & Seeley, for respondent.

*Per Gw'iam.*

The record shows that the plaintiff knew that the defendants were acting as agents for the landlord. Her cause of action with respect to the money paid by her, if she has any, is, therefore, against the landlord and not against the defendants. Cooper v. Tim, 16 Misc. Rep. 372.

• It follows that the judgment must be reversed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4338 Supplementary administrative action. ( a ) Notwithstanding any requirement, condition, or limitation stated in or imposed by the regulations concerning the guaranty or insurance of loans to veterans, the Under Secretary for Benefits, or the Executive Director, Loan Guaranty Service, within the limitations and conditions prescribed by the Secretary, is hereby authorized, if he or she finds the interests of the Government are not adversely affected, to relieve undue prejudice to a debtor, holder, or other person, which might otherwise result, provided no such action may be taken which would impair the vested rights of any person affected thereby. If such requirement, condition, or limitation is of an administrative or procedural (not substantive) nature, any employee designated in § 36.4345 is hereby authorized to grant similar relief if he or she finds the failure or error of the lender was due to misunderstanding or mistake and that the interests of the Government are not adversely affected. Provisions of the regulations considered to be of an administrative or procedural (nonsubstantive) nature are limited to the following: ( 1 ) The requirement in § 36.4308(a) that a lender obtain in prior approval of the Secretary before closing a joint loan if the lender or class of lenders is eligible or has been approved by the Secretary to close loans on the automatic basis pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3702(d);
( 2 ) The requirements in § 36.4303(l) concerning the giving of notice in assumption cases under 38 U.S.C. 3714;
( 3 ) The requirement in § 36.4324(d)(3) that no claim is payable unless it is submitted within 1 year after the liquidation sale;
( 4 ) The requirement in § 36.4323(a) to submit notice of election to convey a property to VA within 15 days of the date of liquidation sale;
( 5 ) The determination by the holder in § 36.4323(b) of the amount of indebtedness that must be waived in order to make a property eligible for conveyance;
( 6 ) The determination in § 36.4314(f)(2) of the date beyond which no additional fees or charges will be allowed;
( 7 ) The determination in § 36.4324(a)(3) of the interest payable on a claim under guaranty; and
( 8 ) The reconsideration in § 36.4324(e) of the holder's electronic request for review of any denied items within the claim;
( b ) Authority is hereby granted to the Loan Guaranty Officer to redelegate authority to make any determinations under this section.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3714 and 3720)
[73 FR 6310, Feb. 1, 2008. Redesignated at 75 FR 33705, June 15, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 34319, June 16, 2015]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES DEANGELO COMER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-95-119, CA-98-864-1) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Deangelo Comer, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 12, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 15, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Deangelo Comer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Comer , Nos. CR-95-119; CA-98- 864-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-2134EM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Donald Pinnell, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: December 14, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted Donald Pinnell of possession with intent to distribut e methamphetamine and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The district cour t sentenced Pinnell to 156 months in prison. Pinnell appeals his convictions an d sentence, and we affirm. First, Pinnell contends the evidence does not support his conspiracy conviction. We disagree. Two of Pinnell’s cocons pirators testified they supplied Pinnell quantities of m ethamphetamine for distribution, discussed methamphetamine shipments, an d agreed how to div ide a methamphetamine shipment. Having reviewed the evidence in-2-

the l ight most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists fro m which a reasonable jury could find Pinnell guilty beyond a reasonable doubt o f conspiring to distribute methamphe tamine. See United States v. McCracken , 110 F.3d 535, 540 (8 th Cir. 1997). We also reject Pinnell’s other evidentiary challenges

. Cont rary to Pinnell’s view, the evidence established Pinnell’s participation in th e co nspiracy, thus the district court properly admitted the testimony of Pinnell’ s coconspirators. See United States v. Escobar , 50 F.3d 1414, 1 423 (8th Cir. 1995); Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). Also, the district court did not abuse its discretion when i t admitted evidence of Pinnell’ s earlier methamphetamine-distribution activities because the Gov ernment’s evidence satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidenc e 404(b), and the evidence was more probative than prejudicial. See United States v

. Lyon , 959 F.2d 701, 706 (8th Cir. 1992). Next, we reject Pinnell’s challenge to his sentence because the record shows the district court corr ectly calculated Pinnell’s guideline sentence by attributing to him the amount of

the conspiracy’s methamphetamine that was reasonably foreseeable. Se e United States v. Brown , 148 F.3d 1003, 1008 (8th Cir. 1998). Finally, Pinnell’ s argument that the district court improperly admitted coconspirator testimony exchanged for the Government’s promise of reduced sentences or immunity is foreclosed by th e holdings of this court. See United States v. Payne , 940 F.2d 286, 290-91 (8th Cir

. 1991).
We affirm Pinnell’s convictions and sentence. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### §§ 15.131-15.139 [Reserved]
§ 20.801 Rule 801. The decision. ( a ) *General.* Decisions of the Board will be based on a de novo review of the evidence of record at the time of the agency of original jurisdiction decision on the issue or issues on appeal, and any additional evidence submitted pursuant to Rules 302 and 303 (§§ 20.302 and 20.303). Any findings favorable to the claimant as identified by the agency of original jurisdiction in notification of a decision or in a prior Board decision on an issue on appeal are binding on all agency of original jurisdiction and Board of Veterans' Appeals adjudicators, unless rebutted by evidence that identifies a clear and unmistakable error in the favorable finding. For purposes of this section, findings means conclusions on questions of fact and application of law to facts made by an adjudicator concerning the issue under review.
( b ) *Content.* The decision of the Board will be in writing and will set forth specifically the issue or issues under appellate consideration. Except with respect to appeals which are dismissed because an appellant seeking nonmonetary benefits has died while the appeal was pending, the decision will also include: ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law on all material issues of fact and law presented on the record;
( 2 ) The reasons or bases for those findings and conclusions;
( 3 ) A general statement reflecting whether any evidence was received at a time when not permitted under subpart D, and informing the appellant that any such evidence was not considered by the Board and of the options available to have that evidence reviewed by the Department of Veterans Affairs; and
( 4 ) An order granting or denying the benefit or benefits sought on appeal, dismissing the appeal, or remanding the issue or issues as described in Rule 802 (§ 20.802).
( c ) *Panel decision.* A decision by a panel of Members will be by a majority vote of the panel Members.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7104(d))
[84 FR 188, Jan. 18, 2019]
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
EX-4.b



 CONTRACT DATA PAGE 

Contract Number:
[P9999999999]                        Contract Date: [May 2, 2011] 

 

			
	 Owner: [JOHN DOE]
		 [Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]      Age at Issue: [35]]

		
	 [Owner: [JANE DOE]
		 Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]

		
	 Annuitant: [JOHN DOE]
		 Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]       Age at Issue: [35]

		
	 [Annuitant: [JANE DOE]
		 Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]


 Beneficiary: As named by You 

Initial Purchase Payment: [$10,000.00] 

Purchase Payment Age Limit: [Prior to the 86th birthday] 

Minimum Subsequent Purchase Payment: [$500] 

Fixed Account Options – Minimum Guarantee Rate: [1.0% - 3.0%] 

Minimum Partial Withdrawal Amount: [$1,000] 

Maximum Penalty-Free Withdrawal Percentage: [10%] 

Minimum Systematic Withdrawal Amount: [$100] 

Minimum Amount Remaining After a Partial Withdrawal: [$2,500] 

Withdrawal Charge Schedule: 
  





 
 See Page [11] for Withdrawal Provisions. 

  

					
	AS-993-PPS4 (12/10)		 3
		










 CONTRACT DATA PAGE (Cont’d.) 

 

 Minimum Transfer Amount: [$100] 

Separate Account Charge (including guaranteed death benefit risk charge of [0.10%]): 





 
 Annual Contract Maintenance Fee: [$50] 

Transfer Fee: [$25] 

Earliest Annuity Date After Contract Date: [Two years] 

Latest Annuity Date: [1st day of the month following Age 95] 

Separate Account: [Variable Separate Account] 
  

									
	 




		 Optional Elections:

SunAmerica Income Plus
				 Optional Election Details:
 See
Attached Endorsement ASE-6248
		 





							

  

  

					
	AS-993-PPS4 (12/10)		 4
#### § 21.5141 Tutorial assistance.

An individual who is otherwise eligible to receive benefits under the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program may receive supplemental monetary assistance to provide tutorial services. In determining whether VA will pay the individual this assistance, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4236.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3234, 3492)

[61 FR 29030, June 7, 1996]
§ 17.4000 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* Sections 17.4000 through 17.4040 implement the Veterans Community Care Program, authorized by 38 U.S.C. 1703.
( b ) *Scope.* The Veterans Community Care Program establishes when a covered veteran may elect to have VA authorize an episode of care for hospital care, medical services, or extended care services from an eligible entity or provider. Sections 17.4000 through 17.4040 do not affect eligibility for non-VA care under sections 1724, 1725, 1725A, or 1728 of title 38, United States Code.
#### § 42.44 Right to administrative offset.

The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final, or for which a judgment has been entered under § 42.42 or § 42.43 of this part, or any amount agreed upon in a compromise or settlement under § 42.46 of this part, may be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this subsection against a refund of an overpayment of Federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the defendant.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.450 General. ( a ) ( 1 ) All or any part of the pension, compensation, or emergency officers' retirement pay payable on account of any veteran may be apportioned. ( i ) On behalf of his or her spouse, children, or dependent parents if the veteran is incompetent and is being furnished hospital treatment, institutional, or domiciliary care by the United States, or any political subdivision thereof.
( ii ) If the veteran is not residing with his or her spouse, or if the veteran's children are not residing with the veteran and the veteran is not reasonably discharging his or her responsibility for the spouse's or children's support.
( 2 ) Where any of the children of a deceased veteran are not living with the veteran's surviving spouse, the pension, compensation, or dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to the surviving spouse may be apportioned. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5307)
( b ) Except as provided in § 3.458(e), no apportionment of disability or death benefits will be made or changed solely because a child has entered active duty with the air, military, or naval services of the United States.
( c ) No apportionment will be made where the veteran, the veteran's spouse (when paid “as wife” or “as husband”), surviving spouse, or fiduciary is providing for dependents. The additional benefits for such dependents will be paid to the veteran, spouse, surviving spouse, or fiduciary.
( d ) Any amounts payable for children under §§ 3.459, 3.460 and 3.461 will be equally divided among the children.
( e ) The amount payable for a child in custody of and residing with the surviving spouse shall be paid to the surviving spouse. Amounts payable to a surviving spouse for a child in the surviving spouse's custody but residing with someone else may be apportioned if the surviving spouse is not reasonably contributing to the child's support.
( f ) Prior to release of any amounts the relationship of the claimant and the dependency of a parent will be fully developed, and the necessary evidence secured.
( g ) The provisions of § 3.460 are applicable where the surviving spouse is entitled to a higher rate of pension under the circumstances described in that section.
[26 FR 1594, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 26 FR 7266, Aug. 11, 1961; 27 FR 6974, July 24, 1962; 32 FR 13226, Sept. 19, 1967; 37 FR 6678, Apr. 1, 1972; 44 FR 45939, Aug. 6, 1979]
§ 48.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.