alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 65, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Respondent.

No. 14179.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 22, 1963.

Filed June 4, 1963.

Warren M. Davison, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Atty., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for petitioner.

Robert D. Corbin, Newark, N. J. (Joseph P. Dunn, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record demonstrates that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence viewing the record as a whole and that its conclusions of law are correct. Moreover we do not regard the case as moot and the fact that there has been compliance with the Board’s order does not militate against the injunction sought by it. Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & etc. Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 715, 71 S.Ct. 966, 95 L.Ed. 1309 (1951); Lakeland Bus Lines Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, 278 F.2d 888, 891-892 (3 Cir. 1960).

A decree may be submitted to enforce the Board’s order in full.
§ 21.3131 Rates of payment. ( a ) *Rates.* ( 1 ) VA will publish the monthly rates of basic educational assistance allowance payable under paragraph (a)(2) of this section on the GI Bill education and training website each time there is an increase in the rates.
( 2 ) Except as provided in § 21.3132, the monthly rate of basic educational assistance allowance payable to an eligible person, as defined in § 21.3021, will be the applicable rate provided in 38 U.S.C. 3532, 3686 or 3687, as increased each fiscal year in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 3564 and 3687(d). The rate of pursuit will be determined in accordance with § 21.4270. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3532, 3534, 3564, 3686, 3687)
( b ) *Less than half time.* The monthly rate for an eligible person who is pursuing an institutional course on less than one-half time basis may not exceed the monthly rate of the cost of the course computed on basis of the total cost for tuition and fees which the school requires similarly circumstanced individuals enrolled in the same course to pay. “Cost of the course” does not include the cost of books or supplies which the student is required to purchase at his or her own expense. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3532(a)(2))
( c ) *Courses leading to a secondary school diploma or equivalency certificate.* The monthly rate of Survivors' and Dependents' Educational Assistance payable for an eligible person enrolled in a course leading to a secondary school diploma or equivalency certificate shall be the rate for institutional training stated in paragraph (a) of this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3532(d), 3533)
( d ) *Payments made to eligible persons in the Republic of the Philippines or to certain Filipinos.* When the eligible person is pursuing training at an institution located in the Republic of the Philippines or when an eligible child's entitlement is based on the service of a veteran in the Philippine Commonwealth Army, or as a Philippine Scout as defined in § 3.40 (b), (c), or (d) of this chapter, payments of educational assistance allowance made after December 31, 1994, will be made at the rate of 50 cents for each dollar authorized.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3532(d), 3565)
[61 FR 26110, May 24, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 67778, Dec. 9, 1998; 66 FR 32227, June 14, 2001; 68 FR 34321, June 9, 2003; 68 FR 37206, June 23, 2003; 69 FR 62207, Oct. 25, 2004; 73 FR 79647, Dec. 30, 2008; 84 FR 22372, May 17, 2019]
§ 21.6042 Entry, reentry and completion. ( a ) *Dates of entry.* A veteran found eligible under the provisions of § 21.6040 of this part may not begin pursuit of a vocational training program before February 1, 1985, or later than December 31, 1992, except under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The veteran receives a pension award less than 120 days before December 31, 1992;
( 2 ) Illness or other circumstance beyond the veteran's control prevent earlier entry. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(4); Pub. L. 102-291)
( b ) *Entry precluded.* In no event may a veteran begin a vocational training program after August 1, 1993. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(4); Pub. L. 100-687; Pub. L. 102-291)
( c ) *Reentry.* The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are also applicable to veterans reentering a vocational training program following a redetermination of eligibility. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(4); Pub. L. 102-291)
( d ) *Final termination of services.* No veteran may receive assistance under this temporary program after January 31, 1998. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(4); Pub. L. 100-687; Pub. L. 102-291)
( e ) *Provision of vocational training and services during the period beginning February 1, 1992 and ending May 20, 1992.* The provision of a vocational training program (including related evaluations and other related services) to a veteran under the provisions of subpart I of this part, and related determinations during the period beginning February 1, 1992, and ending May 20, 1992, is ratified.
(Authority: Pub. L. 102-291)
[53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 17272, Apr. 24, 1990; 58 FR 41637, Aug. 5, 1993]
§ 42.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 42.7 of this part only if— ( 1 ) The Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 42.3 of this part with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to the claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money or the value of property or services, or both, demanded or requested in violation of § 42.3(a) of this part does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time shall include only those claims arising from the same transaction (e.g., grant, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person's claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested.
# H **1/** 

# C **13**



# – **NMR and FT -**  **IR Spectra for Certificate of Com position**  **Sample ID**

**– CIN 10081845 DC**  **- 024723 JWH2011**  **- 25**  **H 1** 



# - **NMR**

__ 25 ___ mg of test substance added to 1mL of CDCL 3 in a 5 mm I.D tube Spectra acquired using a Varian Mercury
- Vx 300 MHz spectrometer (QOD# ATD/EP
- OP
- 001) **C 13** 



# - **NMR**

__ 100 _____ mg of test substance added to 1 ml of CDCL 3 in a 5 mm ID tube Spectra acquired using a Varian Mercury
- Vx 300 MHz spectrometer (QOD# ATD/EP
- OP
- 001) **FT -**  **IR** Sample was run neat between NaCL plates. Spectr a acquired using a Nicolet Nexus 470 spectrometer (EPP: IC AL
- SOP
- 0190 ) Spectra: **Number Type** 

**( 1**  

# H, **1** 

# H/ **1** 

# H, **13** 

# C, D **2** 

# O exchange) **Full Expanded**  **Temperature (oC)**  **Chemical**

**Shifts** 1 H1 X R/T 2 H1 X R/T 3 C13 X R/T 4 C13 X R/T X 5 FT
- IR X R/T **Results** The spectra are consistent with structure for CIN 10081845. This sample contains 0.4 wt% Digl ym e.

O H
C H 3 

# C H 3 

# C H 3 

# C H 3 

# C H 3 

# C H 3 

# C H 3



# Analy st Signature: __



# Bill Lewis

____________________ Date: _ April 6, 2011 FPEG WW IC ROCH QUALITY/ANALYTICAL

# H **1** 

# NMR

**– Full Scale**  pha se fil.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Chemical Shift (ppm) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12NormalizedIntensity



### TMS
CHLOROFORM-d O H
C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3



# H **1** 

# NMR Expanded Scale phasef il.

5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Chemical Shift (ppm) 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.045 0.050 0.055 0.060NormalizedIntensity



### Di glyme O H
C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3

# C **13** 

# NMR Full Scale phasef il.

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Chemical Shift (ppm) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0NormalizedIntensity



### TMS CHLOROFORM- d O H
C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3



# C **13** 

# NMR Expanded scale with Chemical shifts phasefil.

96 88 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 Chemical Shift (ppm) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0NormalizedIntensity



### CHL OROFORM- d69.0352.2133.1232.7030.0128.8422.92 O H
C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 C H 3

# FT **- IR Spectrum neat** 

5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5 7 0 7 5 8 0 8 5%T

8 00 1 00 0 1 50 0 2 00 0 3 00 0 Wa venu mb er s ( cm -1 )
# OAR Box 

# 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 105 ) ll-K-(B)-9 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7 p. i

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 105of 325P. 2 TTyT. ^ 

## ENERG YAN D ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . 

# A-83-2 7

II-K-(B)-9 4 Novembe r 4 , 198 2

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 SUBJECT : Industria l Boiler.NSPS : SO - Cos t Effective Ratio s

EP A Contrac t No . 68-02-285 6 Dea r Robert r Enclose dar e IFCA

M result s fo r alternative SO - regulatory options . Tabl e 1 include s cos t an demissionimpact s an dC E ratio s tha t wer e derive dfro

m the nint hroun

dresult s o f August , 1981 . Tabl e 2 shows coa l marke t share s fo r the nint hround , an dthe numbe r o f new boiler s fo r 1984-8 8 fro

m curren t IFCA

M outputs . The result s i nTabl e 1 incor porat e a roughadjustmen t t o the actua l nint hroun dresult s t o reflec t a chang e i nth

e boile r siz e distributio ninstalle di nIFCA M i nNovember , 1981 . Thes e table s wer e telecopie dt o yo uo nNovembe r 3 , 1982 . Onl y on e chang e wa s mad e i nTabl e l r the "S0 2 baselin e annualize dcosts " inth e sixt hcolum

nwa s change dt o "SO . SI P annualize dcosts. " I f yo uhav e an

y questions , pleas e give me a call .

Respectfull y

yours ,

Kar l F . Hel d KFHrm k Enclosur e
cc : A l Weh eTABL E 1 INDUSTRIAL BOILE R NSP S S0 2 NATIONA L EMISSIONAND COS T IMPACT S IN198 8 FOR S O ALTERNATIV E EMISSIO NREGULATIO N 

### 1 /

Boile r Size s (MMBtu/hr ) 10-5 0 50-10 0 100-25 0 >25 0 TOTA L 2 /

S O SI P ' Emission s (1 0 TPY ) 

### 9 9 

### 10 2 30 4 10 4 60 9 Emissio n

90/5 0 FGD 

### 9 6 8 1 7 5 3 7 Reduction s

1. 2 Coa l 

### 7 3 6 2 5 4

- (Percent )

2.5.,

- - - Coa l 

### 3 5 2 8 2 6

- S O SIP 2 ' '

Annualize d

- - Cost s (1 0 198 2 $ ) 1,48 4 1,40 0 2,53 3 1,62 2 7,03 9 Nationa l

Impact s 90/5 0 FG D 

### 7 0 8 5 

### 15 8 1 0 Contro l Cost s (1 0 198 2 $ ) 1. 2 2. 5 Coa l Coa l 

### 4 8 5 8 

### 11 9

- 

### 3 8 2 7

- Nationa l Cost/To n

(198 2 $/TPY ) 90/5 0 1. 2 FG D Coa l 74 0 66 0 103 0 92 0 69 0 73 0 

### 26 0 Remove d

2. 5 Coa l 

### 9 0 

### 28 0 34 0

-

1 / Result s base d o n nint h round IFCA M mode l runs , date d Augus t 17 , 1981 . Mor e recen t IFCA M outputs , whic h incorporat e change s i n som e o f th e model' s assumptions , ar e no t availabl e fo r S0

_emissio n regulations . Onl yIFCA M run s fo r PM alternativ e regulation s hav e bee n conducte d sinc e August , 1981 . 

### 2 / S O SI P emission s an d S O SI P annualize d cost s ar e take n fro mIFCA M mode l run s wher e th e particula r matte r NSP S i s 0.0 5 lbs/MMBt u fo r al l boiler s >1 0 MMBtu/hr .- I

TABL E 2 COAL MARKE T SHAR E O F INDUSTRIAL BOILE R FOSSI L FUE L US E I N198 8

Boile r Siz e (MMBtu/hr ) 10-5 0 50-10 0 100-25 0 >25 0 TOTA L SO, , Alternat e

S0 o SI P 90/5 0 61 % 13 % 

### 65 % 93 % 79 % 45 %

76 % 78 % Emissio n Regu l FGD 1. 2 Coa l

37 % 

### 48 % 77 % 79 % a t io n

2. 5 Coa l 56 % 

### 64 % 93 % 80 % Tota l

o f Ne w 198 4



### 1 , Numbe r Boiler s -198 8 

### 0 58 4 46 8 14 5 19 7
# Official Journal L 319/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6410 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 319

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6410 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1460 of 9 September 2021 amending for the 322nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/1461 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 8 September 2021 appointing two Advocates-General to the Court of Justice | 4 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/1462 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 8 September 2021 appointing a Judge to the General Court | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1460 of 9 September 2021 amending for the 322nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2021/1461 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 8 September 2021 appointing two Advocates-General to the Court of Justice

4

*

Decision (EU) 2021/1462 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 8 September 2021 appointing a Judge to the General Court

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6269

RANDOLPH KELLY,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HELEN F. FAHEY, Virginia Parole Board Chair; WENDY K. 

BROWN, Court and Legal Services Manager; SCOTT ROBERTS, 

Probation/Parole Officer,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00036-AJT-IDD)

Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph D. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Randolph D. Kelly appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Kelly v. Fahey, No. 1:13-cv-00036-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. 

filed Feb. 11, 2013 & entered Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1571

KAREN HOBBS; DIANE MARKMAN MCCLARD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-97-538-A)

Submitted: October 27, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Beattie, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Sharon

Pandak, County Attorney, Stephen A. MacIsaac, Deputy County

Attorney, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Prince William, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Karen Hobbs and Diane Markman McClard appeal the denial of

their motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary

injunction in this action alleging in conclusory terms various acts

of gender discrimination by their employer, Prince William County

(Virginia). After a hearing, the district court denied the motion

for interlocutory injunctive relief, principally for failure to

demonstrate any irreparable injury from the conduct seemingly challenged. Reviewing that decision for abuse of discretion, we have

carefully considered the briefs and record and, finding no abuse of

discretion, affirm essentially on the reasoning of the district

court. Hobbs et al. v. Prince William County, C.A. No. 97-538-A

(E.D. Va. April 21, 1997).

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.110 Computation of time limit. ( a ) In computing the time limit for any action required of a claimant or beneficiary, including the filing of claims or evidence requested by VA, the first day of the specified period will be excluded and the last day included. This rule is applicable in cases in which the time limit expires on a workday. Where the time limit would expire on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, the next succeeding workday will be included in the computation.
( b ) *The first day of the specified period* referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be the date of mailing of notification to the claimant or beneficiary of the action required and the time limit therefor. The date of the letter of notification shall be considered the date of mailing for purposes of computing time limits. As to appeals, see §§ 19.52, 20.203, and 20.110 of this chapter.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[55 FR 13529, Apr. 11, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 32443, June 10, 1993; 84 FR 168, Jan. 18, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2467 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2467

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ``Frank J. 
                    Guarini Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRANK J. GUARINI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Frank J. Guarini Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank J. 
Guarini Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2467

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ``Frank J. 
                    Guarini Post Office Building''.
```
# Official Journal C 160A/5 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 665 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 665 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2023/C 160 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/288/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments | 1 |
| 2023/C 160 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/289/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support – Directorate for Development and Support | 7 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2023/C 160 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/288/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments

1

2023/C 160 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/289/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support – Directorate for Development and Support

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NO. 06 -18- 00077 CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

DAVEN MICHAEL RAY

, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

TO SAID HONORABLE COURT:

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

James P. Fins trom, appointed counsel for Daven Michael Ray

, Appellant, moves the Court to allow him to withdraw from

representation of Appellant in this cause and shows the Court that he

is familiar with this case and was appointed to represent the

Appellant at the t rial and appeal of this cause and has examined the

record in this cause and is of the opinion that the appeal is without

merit on direct appeal and that there are no grounds which would

arguably support reversal of this conviction on direct appeal and,

fur ther, is of the opinion that the Appellant ’ s plea of true to the ACCEPTED 06-18-00077-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/4/2018 1:25 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK2 allegations in the State ’ s mo tion to adjudicate wi thout any objections

at the hearing is sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, counsel for

Appellant moves that he be permitted to withdraw from representation

in this cause

. Respectfully submitted,

__ /s/ James P. Finstrom

_ James P. Finstrom Counsel for Appellant 202 S. Marshall, P.O. Box 276 Jefferson, Texas 75657 903

- 665

- 7111 Fax: 903

- 665

- 7167 Texas Bar #07038000 jpfinstrom@sbcglobal.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have delivered a true copy of this brief to Hon. Angela Smoak

, counsel for the State

, on this 4 th day of J une , 201 8

.

__ /s/ James P. Finstro m

___ James P. Finstrom
#### John Fenton, Respondent, *v.*Gustave Scholer, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Davis & Looser (Edwin G. Davis, of counsel), for appellant.

Maurice Meyer, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: ■ O’Dwyer and McCarthy, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.