alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 5 April 2005         

terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyester high tenacity filament yarn originating in Belarus, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan

(2005/289/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1) (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 9 thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A.   PROCEDURE

1.   General

2.   Initiation

3.   Questionnaires

B.   PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT

1.   Product concerned

2.   Like product

C.   DUMPING

1.   General methodology

1.1.   Normal value

1.2.   Export price

1.3.   Comparison

1.4.   Dumping margin

2.   Belarus

2.1.   Analogue country

2.2.   Normal value

2.3.   Export price

2.4.   Comparison

2.5.   Dumping margin

3.   Republic of Korea

3.1.   Normal value

3.2.   Export price

3.3.   Comparison

3.4.   Dumping margins

4.   Taiwan

4.1.   Normal value

4.2.   Export price

4.3.   Comparison

4.4.   Dumping margins

D.   INJURY

1.   Definition of the Community Industry

2.   Community consumption

3.   Volume of the dumped imports and market share

4.   Prices of the imports concerned

(a)   Evolution of prices

(b)   Price undercutting

5.   Situation of the Community industry

(a)   Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation

(b)   Stocks

(c)   Sales volume and market share

(d)   Sales prices

(e)   Profitability

(f)   Investments and return on investments

(g)   Cash flow and ability to raise capital

(h)   Employment, productivity and wages

(i)   Magnitude of dumping

(j)   Recovery from past dumping or subsidization

6.   Conclusion on injury

E.   CAUSALITY

1.   Introduction

2.   Effects of the dumped imports

3.   Effects of other factors

Imports originating in other countries

(a)   Imports not having a negative impact on the situation of the Community industry

(b)   Imports having a negative impact on the situation of the Community industry

4.   Conclusion on causation

F.   CONCLUSION

DECIDES:

Article 1

The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of high-tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of polyesters of less than 67 decitex, falling within CN code 5402 20 00 and originating in Belarus, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, is hereby terminated.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 April 2005.

For the Commission

Peter MANDELSON            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

(2)OJ C 24, 28.1.2004, p. 20.

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00002

- CR

IN RE Corey KING

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 15, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 2, 2020, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Acc ordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR7910, styled The State of Texas v. Corey King , pending in the 144th

Judicial District Cour t, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.
#### § 12.24 Operation of lost and found service.

Unless maintained by the Public Buildings Service, the lost and found service will be maintained by an employee designated by the Manager to be known as the lost and found custodian. VA Form 3771, Record of Lost or Found Article, will be used for recording articles of any personal property lost or found. Every effort will be made to determine rightful ownership of found articles and to recover items which have been reported lost. Currency, including readily negotiable instruments, found and delivered to the lost and found custodian will not be retained beyond the official closing hour. The currency or negotiable instruments will be delivered to the agent cashier before the close of business. Individuals claiming found articles will furnish complete identification and satisfy the facility authority of rightful ownership. Where more than one individual claims ownership the matter will be referred to the Manager for decision. All articles of personal property remaining unclaimed for 90 days or more will be disposed of in accordance with § 12.8.

[21 FR 3875, June 6, 1956]
#### § 1.507 Disclosures to members of Congress.

Members of Congress shall be furnished in their official capacity in any case such information contained in the Department of Veterans Affairs files as may be requested for official use. However, in any unusual case, the request will be presented to the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, or staff or administration head for personal action. When the requested information is of a type which may not be furnished a claimant, the member of Congress shall be advised that the information is furnished to him or her confidentially in his official capacity and should be so treated by him or her. (See 38 U.S.C. 5701.) Information concerning the beneficiary designation of a United States Government Life Insurance or National Service Life Insurance policy is deemed confidential and privileged and during the insured's lifetime shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the insured or his or her duly appointed fiduciary unless the insured or the fiduciary authorizes the release of such information.

[32 FR 10848, July 25, 1967]
#### Charles H. Duryea, Appellant, *v.*Joseph Matranga, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan.

Lyman B. Bunnell, for appellant.

John Palmieri, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It was error to take this case from the jury. The identity of name raises a presumption of identity of person where there is similarity of residence or occupation (Lawson Presump. Ev. 307), and, notwithstanding the defendant’s denial, the question as to the defendant’s identity should have been submitted to the jury. There is sufficient evidence in the record to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff.

Present: Beekmatt, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
TS-ASLT10/20/30 

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2 

Worker/Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
# Official Journal C 310/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.310.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 310 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5315 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.310.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 310

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5315 November 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 310/01 | Final accounts of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2009 | 1 |
| 2010/C 310/02 | Independent Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the EDFs | 211 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 310/01

Final accounts of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2009

1

2010/C 310/02

Independent Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the EDFs

211

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2463 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2463

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the special rule 
  for recognition of gain on dispositions to implement Federal Energy 
     Regulatory Commission or State electric restructuring policy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2007

Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, and Mr. Levin) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the special rule 
  for recognition of gain on dispositions to implement Federal Energy 
     Regulatory Commission or State electric restructuring policy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR RECOGNITION OF GAIN ON 
              DISPOSITIONS TO IMPLEMENT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
              COMMISSION OR STATE ELECTRIC RESTRUCTURING POLICY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 451(i) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 2008'' in 
paragraph (3) and inserting ``January 1, 2010''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Clause (ii) of section 451(i)(4)(B) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``December 31, 2007'' and inserting 
``the date which is 4 years after the close of the taxable year in 
which occurs the transaction to which the election under this 
subsection applies''.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by this section shall apply to transactions 
        after December 31, 2007.
            (2) Technical amendment.--The amendment made by subsection 
        (b) shall take effect as if included in section 909 of the 
        American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
                                 <all>
```
#### The Climax Specialty Co., Respondent, *v.*Benjamin C. Smith & Sons, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

April, 1900.)

Verification of complaint — By attorney of domestic corporation — Code Civ. Pro., § 525, subd. 3.

Where all the officers of a domestic corporation are absent from the county where its attorney resides, he may verify the complaint in an action brought by the corporation.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, upon a trial had before the court, without a jury.

Samuel S. Walters, for appellant.

William Stuart, for respondent.

O’Gorman, J.

The judgment in this case which was taken on defendant’s default and rendered upon a verified complaint, is assailed by the defendant upon the ground that the verification of the complaint was made by the plaintiff’s attorney, defendant’s contention being that a pleading of a domestic corporation must be verified by an officer, and that subdivision 3 of section 525 of the Code of Civil Procedure has no application to pleadings interposed on behalf of a domestic corporation. We cannot yield our assent to this contention. A reading of the entire section of the Code in question seems to warrant the conclusion that subdivision 3 applies to all parties, whether domestic corporations or not, and where, as in the ease before us, it appears by the attorney’s verification that all the officers are absent from the county where the attorney resides, the verification should be held to be a proper one. High Rock Knitting Co. v. Bronner, 18 Misc. Rep. 627; affirmed, 29 App. Div. 627; Syracuse Moulding Co. v. Squires, 13 N. Y. Supp. 547. In the cases cited by the appellant, the precise point under consideration was not involved. Defendant’s claim, therefore, that the court was without juris*276diction to render judgment on the verified complaint, is not well taken, and as the other points raised are without merit, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Beekmae, P. J., and Giegerigh, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129815(51) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, CLARK HILL, PLC, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129815 

 COA: 261480 

Oakland CC: 2004-058339-CK 

TRACY KATZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of May 

30, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
IB 

Union Calendar No. 292 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2489 

[Report No. 110–468] 

To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the 

prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. BERMAN (for himself and Mr. PENCE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 4, 2007 

Additional sponsors: Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. STARK, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Mr. KIRK, Ms. WATERS, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. 

DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. 

SHAYS, and Mr. MITCHELL

DECEMBER 4, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, 

to allow the prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2489 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Genocide Account3 ability Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GENOCIDE. 

5 Section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(d) REQUIRED CIRCUMSTANCE FOR OFFENSES.— 

9 The circumstance referred to in subsections (a) and (c) 

10 is that— 

11 ‘‘(1) the offense is committed in whole or in 

12 part within the United States; 

13 ‘‘(2) the alleged offender is a national of the 

14 United States (as that term is defined in section 101 

15 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

16 1101)); 

17 ‘‘(3) the alleged offender is an alien lawfully ad18 mitted for permanent residence in the United States 

19 (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)); 

21 ‘‘(4) the alleged offender is a stateless person 

22 whose habitual residence is in the United States; or 

23 ‘‘(5) after the conduct required for the offense 

24 occurs, the alleged offender is brought into, or found 

25 in, the United States, even if that conduct occurred 

26 outside the United States.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 292 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2489 

[Report No. 110

–468] 

A BILL 

To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States 

propriate circumstances. Code, to allow the prosecution of genocide in apDECEMBER 4, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# Official Journal L 361/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 361 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6330 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 361

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6330 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1577 of 21 September 2020 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1577 of 21 September 2020 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 4/7 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 4 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 497 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 4

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 497 January 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 004/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 004/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4069 — Cognis B.V./Golden Hope Plantations BHD/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 004/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 004/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4069 — Cognis B.V./Golden Hope Plantations BHD/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.652 Periodic certification of continued eligibility. Except as otherwise provided: ( a ) Individuals to whom benefits are being paid are required to certify, when requested, that any or all of the eligibility factors which established entitlement to the benefit being paid continue to exist. The beneficiary will be advised at the time of the request that the certification must be furnished within 60 days from the date of the request therefor and that failure to do so will result in the reduction or termination of benefits. ( 1 ) If the certification is not received within 60 days from the date of the request, the eligibility factor(s) for which certification was requested will be considered to have ceased to exist as of the end of the month in which it was last shown by the evidence of record to have existed. For purposes of this paragraph, the effective date of reduction or termination of benefits will be in accordance with §§ 3.500 through 3.504 as in effect on the date the eligibility factor(s) is considered to have ceased to exist. The claimant will be advised of the proposed reduction or termination of benefits and the date the proposed action will be effective. An additional 60 days from the date of notice of the proposed action will be provided for the claimant to respond.
( 2 ) If the certification is not received within the additional 60 day period, the proposed reduction or termination of benefits will be put into effect.
( b ) When the required certification is received, benefits will be adjusted, if necessary, in accordance with the facts found. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)


Cross References:
Employment Questionnaire, failure to return. See § 3.501(f). Income and Net Worth Questionnaires. See § 3.661. [52 FR 43063, Nov. 9, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2495 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2495

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary 
 and exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-
             connected disability and to their dependents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Souder, Ms. Foxx, 
Mr. Conaway, Mr. Lincoln Davis of Tennessee, and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary 
 and exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-
             connected disability and to their dependents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Commissary and 
Exchange Store Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES FOR DISABLED VETERANS 
              AND THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    (a) Extension of Privileges.--Chapter 54 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans 
              and their dependents
    ``(a) Disabled Veterans.--A veteran with a compensable service-
connected disability shall be permitted to use commissary and exchange 
stores on the same basis as a member of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(b) Dependents.--A dependent of a veteran described in subsection 
(a) shall be permitted to use commissary and exchange stores on the 
same basis as a dependent of a member of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms `veteran' and 
`service-connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 
of title 38.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and 
                            their dependents.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--Section 1065 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```