alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-IA-2009-N201]
[96300-1671-0000-P5]

Receipt of Applications for Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications for permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, invite the public to 
comment on the following applications for permits to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. The Endangered Species Act requires 
that we invite public comment on these permit applications.

DATES: Written data, comments or requests must be received by October 
26, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these 
applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of 
the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who 
submits a written request for a copy of such documents within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, 
Room 212, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority, 
telephone 703/358-2104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Endangered Species

    The public is invited to comment on the following applications for 
a permit to conduct certain activities with endangered species. This 
notice is provided pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Submit your written 
data, comments, or requests for copies of the complete applications to 
the address shown in ADDRESSES.
Applicant: Hollywood Animals, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, PRT-060474, PRT-
207080
    The applicant requests permits to export/re-export and re-import 
two captive-born leopards (Panthera pardus) to worldwide locations for 
the purpose of enhancement of the species through conservation 
education. The permit numbers and animals are: PRT-060474, Athari; PRT-
207080, Murphy. This notification covers activities to be conducted by 
the applicant over a three-year period and the import of any potential 
progeny born while overseas.
    The following applicants request a permit to import the sport-
hunted trophy of one male bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) 
culled from a captive herd maintained under the management program of 
the Republic of South Africa, for the purpose of enhancement of the 
survival of the species.
Applicant: Richard R. Arend, Rochester, MN, PRT-220562
Applicant: Joe B. Tinney, Houston, TX, PRT-222864
Applicant: Lorenzo J. Ferraro, Chester Springs, PA, PRT-225871

    Dated: September 18, 2009.
Lisa J. Lierheimer,
Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management 
Authority.
[FR Doc. E9-23187 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-S
```
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01037-CV 

IN RE JUAN GUERRA AND JUAN DELTORO, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-07967 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which relators complain of 

the trial court’s order granting the amended motion to compel arbitration filed by the real parties 

in interest. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential 

Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, 

we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we 

deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the 

petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). 

181037F.P05 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002



     *    The originally  executed copy of this Certification will be maintained
          at the Company's  offices and will be made  available  for  inspection
          upon request.
41776.

#### RICKER v. BRANCALE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “As against general demurrer, the general allegation of agency of one of the defendants for the other is sufficient.” *Williams v. Ballenger,*87 Ga. App. 255 (2) (73 SE2d 509).

(a) “In an action founded upon negligence, mere general averments of negligence are sufficient against general demurrer. *Hudgins v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.,*122 Ga. 695 (50 SE 974).” *Harvey v. Zell,*87 Ga. App. 280, 284 (73 SE2d 605).

(b) Assuming but not deciding that the plaintiff’s petition as originally filed was subject to special demurrer it was not subject to the defendant’s general demurrer, and the amendments filed prior to the first judgment on demurrers cured any alleged defects in the original petition.

(c) The second amendment to the plaintiff’s petition was not subject to the defendant’s renewed and additional demurrers and objections thereto.

2. “Whether, after the plaintiff has closed his case in chief and the defendant has closed its evidence, the plaintiff should be allowed to introduce evidence, not in rebuttal, is a matter in the discretion of the trial court.” *Georgia R. & Bkg. Co. v. Churchill,*113 Ga. 12 (3) (38 SE 336). See also *Autrey v. State,*23 Ga. App. 763 (99 SE 389), and citations.

3. Mere ownership of property does not authorize the owner to testify as to its value without giving the facts on which he bases his opinion. See *Hoard v. Wiley,*113 Ga. App. 328 (147 SE2d 782). While there were dissents and special concurrences in such case there was no dissent as to this principle of law.

(a) The trial court erred in permitting the plaintiff to testify over objection as to the value of his automobile before and after the collision without testifying as to the facts on which he based such opinion.

4. The evidence adduced demanded a finding for the plaintiff on *448the question of liability and the refusal of the trial court to exclude the jury so that the defendant could make a motion for directed verdict for the defendant was not harmful error.

Submitted February 8, 1966

Decided April 5, 1966.

*Oze R. Horton,*for appellant.

*Owens & Porter,*for appellee.

5. Since there was no competent evidence as to the plaintiff’s damages, and the trial court erred in admitting the “conclusion” of the plaintiff as to the value of his automobile, the case must be remanded for another trial.

*Remanded for new trial.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
#### § 21.410 Delegation of authority.

The Secretary delegates authority to the Under Secretary for Benefits to make findings and decisions under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 and regulations, precedents, and instructions that affect vocational rehabilitation services for disabled veterans. The Under Secretary for Benefits may further delegate this authority to supervisory and non-supervisory Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) staff members.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512(a))

[62 FR 17710, Apr. 11, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
50

 
audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 8, 2009              /s/ Pierre Legault   Pierre Legault   Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer  
51
# Official Journal L 184/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 184 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 598 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 184

English edition

Legislation

Volume 598 July 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1075 of 23 March 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parltime and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the content of recovery plans, resolution plans and group resolution plans, the minimum criteria that the competent authority is to assess as regards recovery plans and group recovery plans, the conditions for group financial support, the requirements for independent valuers, the contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers, the procedures and contents of notification requirements and of notice of suspension and the operational functioning of the resolution colleges (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1075 of 23 March 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parltime and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the content of recovery plans, resolution plans and group resolution plans, the minimum criteria that the competent authority is to assess as regards recovery plans and group recovery plans, the conditions for group financial support, the requirements for independent valuers, the contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers, the procedures and contents of notification requirements and of notice of suspension and the operational functioning of the resolution colleges (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.715 Radiation Exposure Compensation Act of 1990, as amended. ( a ) *Compensation.* ( 1 ) A radiation-exposed veteran, as defined in 38 CFR 3.309(d)(3), who receives a payment under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) (RECA), will not be denied compensation to which the veteran is entitled under 38 CFR 3.309(d) for months beginning after March 26, 2002.
( 2 ) A veteran who is not a “radiation-exposed veteran,” as defined in 38 CFR 3.309(d)(3), is not entitled to VA compensation for disability caused by a disease that is attributable to exposure to radiation for which the veteran has received a payment under RECA.
( b ) *Dependency and indemnity compensation.* A person who receives a payment under RECA based upon a veteran's death will not be denied dependency and indemnity compensation to which the person is entitled under 38 CFR 3.5 and 3.22 for months beginning after March 26, 2002.
( c ) *Offset of RECA payment against VA benefits.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the amount of a RECA payment will be deducted from the amount of compensation payable pursuant to § 3.309(d) or the amount of dependency and indemnity compensation payable.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1112(c)(4), 1310(c); 42 U.S.C. 2210 note)
[71 FR 44919, Aug. 8, 2006]
#### §§ 39.102-39.119 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                                  FORM 53-901F
                              (PREVIOUSLY FORM 27)



1.       REPORTING ISSUER

         Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the "Company")
         Suite 654 -- 999 Canada Place
         Vancouver, B.C.
         V6C 3E1


2.       DATE OF MATERIAL CHANGE

         December 31, 2001

3.       PRESS RELEASE

         Date of Issuance:      January 7, 2002
         Place of Issuance:     Vancouver, British Columbia


4.       SUMMARY OF MATERIAL CHANGE

         Loans owed by certain subsidiaries of the Company to entities (the
         "Lenders") controlled by Robert M. Friedland, the Chairman of the
         Company, were converted by the Lenders into 30,625,000 common shares of
         the Company.


5.       FULL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CHANGE

         In connection with the Company's acquisition of ABM Mining Limited
         ("ABM") in December, 2000, loans owed by ABM and its subsidiaries to
         the Lenders were made convertible into common shares of the Company, at
         a price of CDN$1.20 per share, subject to the issuance of a maximum of
         30,625,000 common shares. All of the Lenders are controlled by Robert
         M. Friedland and the loans were convertible at the Lenders' option.
         Since the loans have been converted into the maximum number of common
         shares issuable, approximately US$5 million of the loans remain
         outstanding and no longer carry conversion rights.

         As a result of the conversion, the Company has a total of 171,158,484
         common shares issued and outstanding. Mr. Friedland now controls
         100,758,334 common shares, amounting to approximately 59% of the
         Company's outstanding common shares. Mr. Friedland has announced that
         he is holding his newly acquired shares for investment purposes.


<PAGE>


                                      - 2 -

6.       RELIANCE ON SECTION 75(3) OF THE ACT

         Not applicable


7.       OMITTED INFORMATION

         Not applicable


8.       SENIOR OFFICER

         For further information contact:

         Beverly Bartlett, Corporate Secretary
         Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
         Suite 654 -- 999 Canada Place
         Vancouver, B.C.  V6C 3E1

         Telephone:  (604) 688-5755


9.       STATEMENT OF SENIOR OFFICER

         The foregoing accurately discloses the material change referred to
         herein.

         DATED at Vancouver this 7th day of January, 2002.

         IVANHOE MINES LTD.


         Per:
                  --------------------------------------------
                  Beverly Bartlett
                  Corporate Secretary
§ 82.31 How can the public recommend changes to scientific elements underlying the dose reconstruction process? ( a ) At any time, the public can submit written recommendations to NIOSH for changes to scientific elements underlying the dose reconstruction process, based on relevant new research findings and technological advances. NIOSH will provide these recommendations to the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to be addressed at a public meeting of the Advisory Board, with notification provided to the source of the recommendations. Recommendations should be addressed to: Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-R45, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.
( b ) The public can also submit recommendations by e-mail. Instructions will be provided on the NIOSH Internet homepage at *www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas .*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6529

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ALVIS DAMON WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 3:13

- cr - 00758

- JFA

- 1 )

Submitted : November 18, 2021 Decided: December 6, 2021

Before WYNN, FLOYD and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alvis Damon Williams , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alvis Damon Williams appeals the district court’s order deny ing his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and the court’s order denying his motion for discovery. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s d enial of his motion for compassionate release , he has forfeited appellate review of that order , and w e affirm

. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. As for the court’s order denying Williams’ motion for discovery, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No. 3:13

- cr - 00758

- JFA

- 1 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2021). We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    this Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Thor Industries, Inc.
 Date:  November 27, 2006
    /s/      Walter L. BennettWalter L. BennettExecutive Vice President,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer) 21
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.



Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The
Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly
Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated : May 12, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    SANDRA A. KNELL
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Sandra A. Knell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.