alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5


CERTIFICATION


I, Greg Cavers, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cybin Inc.;


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.    The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:


a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.    The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditor and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: June 22, 2022    By: /s/ Greg Cavers  Greg CaversChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.26 Section 306 and old-law pension annual income limitations. ( a ) The annual income limitations for section 306 pension shall be the amounts specified in section 306(a)(2)(A) of Pub. L. 95-588, as increased from time to time under section 306(a)(3) of Pub. L. 95-588.
( b ) If a beneficiary under section 306 pension is in need of aid and attendance, the annual income limitation under paragraph (a) of this section shall be increased in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1521(d), as in effect on December 31, 1978.
( c ) The annual income limitations for old-law pension shall be the amounts specified in section 306(b)(3) of Pub. L. 95-588, as increased from time to time under section 306(b)(4) of Pub. L. 95-588.
( d ) Each time there is an increase under section 306 (a)(3) or (b)(4) of Pub. L. 95-588, the actual income limitations will be published in the “Notices” section of the Federal Register.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[52 FR 34908, Sept. 14, 1987]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20682 Summary Calendar CHARLES B. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-3959

___________________________________________

March 9, 2000 Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The district court erred in dismissing Charles B. Williams’ (Texas prisoner # 554523) 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed Williams’ second state postconviction application on October 1, 1997, not on April 9, 1997, as found by the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings.2

VACATED AND REMANDED.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
THE FIRST CONNECTICUT CAPITAL CORPORATION (10QSB AMENDED)


Exhibit

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the Quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by The First Connecticut
Capital Corporation (the "Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Registrant.


-------------------------------------       -------------------------------
Lawrence R. Yurdin                          Lawrence R. Yurdin
President and Chief Executive Officer       Chief Financial Officer


                                       27
<PAGE>
§ 1.963a Waiver; erroneous payments of pay and allowances. ( a ) The provisions applicable to VA (including refunds) concerning waiver actions relating to erroneous payments to VA employees of pay and allowances, and travel, transportation, and relocation expenses and allowances, are set forth in 5 U.S.C. 5584. The members of Committees on Waivers and Compromises assigned to waiver actions under § 1.955 of this part are delegated all authority granted the Secretary under 5 U.S.C. 5584 to deny waiver or to grant waiver in whole or in part of any debt regardless of the amount of the indebtedness. Committee members also have exclusive authority to consider and render a decision on the appeal of a waiver denial or the granting of a partial waiver. However, the Chairperson of the Committee must assign the appeal to a different Committee member or members than the member or members who made the original decision that is now the subject of the appeal. The following are the only provisions of §§ 1.955 through 1.970 of this part applicable to waiver actions concerning erroneous payments of pay and allowances, and travel, transportation, and relocation expenses and allowances, under 5 U.S.C. 5584: §§ 1.955(a) through (e)(2), 1.956(a)(introductory text) and (a)(3), 1.959, 1.960, 1.963a, and 1.967(c).
( b ) Waiver may be granted under this section and 5 U.S.C. 5584 when collection would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interest of the United States. Generally, these criteria will be met by a finding that the erroneous payment occurred through administrative error and that there is no indication of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack of good faith on the part of the employee or other person having an interest in obtaining a waiver of the claim, and waiver would not otherwise be inequitable. Generally, waiver is precluded when an employee receives a significant unexplained increase in pay or allowances, or otherwise knows, or reasonably should know, that an erroneous payment has occurred, and fails to make inquiries or bring the matter to the attention of the appropriate officials. Waiver under this standard will depend upon the facts existing in each case.
( c ) An application for waiver must be received within 3 years immediately following the date on which the erroneous payment was discovered.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5584; 38 U.S.C. 501).
[69 FR 62202, Oct. 25, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           70625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2232207
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                    5704474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10062923
<PP&E>                                         4347122
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2534138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12336673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4321399
<BONDS>                                         169125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      10703015
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12336673
<SALES>                                        5053512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5053512
<CGS>                                          3203428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3203428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1395246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               61814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 385631
<INCOME-TAX>                                    171742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             213889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    213889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q OF
RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30,2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,326,249
<SECURITIES>                                 7,279,912
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,785,461
<PP&E>                                         343,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,152,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,159,583
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,152,016
<SALES>                                        298,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               942,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,813,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,870,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,870,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.49)


</TABLE>
§ 21.4003 Revision of decisions. The revision of a decision on which an action was predicated will be subject to the following sections: ( a ) Clear and unmistakable error, § 3.105(a) of this chapter;
( b ) Difference of opinion, § 3.105(b) of this chapter;
( c ) Character of discharge, § 3.105(c) of this chapter;
( d ) Severance of service connection, § 3.105(d) of this chapter;
( e ) Veteran no longer totally and permanently disabled, § 21.4135(o).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20593 Summary Calendar

JOHN SCOTT,
Plaintiff-Appellant

v. BILLY PIERCE, Chaplain-Director- Texas Department of Criminal Justice; AKBAR SHABAZZ, Chaplain

- Texas Department of Criminal Justice; KEITH THEDFORD, Chaplain

- Texas Department of Criminal Justice; TRACY BAILEY, Warden

- Texas Department of Criminal Justice; BREWER, Warden; VANCE DRUM , Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13 -CV- 3572

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Scott, Texas prisoner # 806296, is a practitioner of Islam and, in particular, an adherent of the Moorish Science Temple of America sect of
Islam. While in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED May 16, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20593 Document: 00513994856 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2017No. 15

- 20593

2 Estelle Unit, Scott filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit alleging that the prison’s religious programming policies violated his rights under the First Amendment
and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denied Scott’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed his lawsuit with prejudice.
We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo. Haverda v. Hays County , 723 F.3d 586, 591 (5th Cir. 2013). “ The First Amendment . . . is violated when prisoners are not afforded ‘reasonable opportunity’ to exercise their religious beliefs. ” Davis v. Davis , 826 F.3d 258, 265 (5th Cir. 2016)

. “RLUIPA imposes a higher burden than does the First Amendment in that the statute requires prison regulators to put forth a stronger justification for regulations that impinge on the religious practices of prison inmates.” Mayfield v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice , 529 F.3d 599, 612 (5th Cir. 2008). Under RLUIPA, “[n]o government shall impose a

s ubstantial burden on [an inmate’s] religious exercise . . . unless [it] demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person -- (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that . . . interest.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc- 1(a). In view of Scott’s conclusional allegations and the defendants’ summary judgment evidence, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-20593 Document: 00513994856 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2017
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 0 3

- 0 4

- 00 228

- CV

Pecan Square Condominiums Homeowners

Association, Inc. , Appellant

v.

Randall K. Frizzell and Brenda T.

Frizzell , Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN400145 , HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Pecan Square Condominiums Homeowners Association, Inc. appeals from a default

judgment rendered against them in this cause. Because the district court granted appellant

= s motion for new

trial, this Court has no jurisd iction over this appeal. We dismiss this appeal.

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and PuryearDismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 30, 2004
§ 1.652 Criteria for determining rights to employee inventions. ( a ) The criteria to be applied in determining the respective rights of the Government and of the employee-inventor in and to any invention subject to these provisions shall be in accordance with the Uniform Patent Policy regulations found at 37 CFR 501.6 and 501.7.
( b ) Ownership in and to inventions arising under Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) pursuant to 15 USC 3710a shall be governed by the provisions of the pertinent CRADA, as authorized by the Federal Technology Transfer Act.
(Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3710a; 37 CFR part 501)
[61 FR 29658, June 12, 1996]
#### § 1.961 Releases.

On matters within its jurisdiction, the Committee may authorize the release of any right, title, claim, lien or demand, however acquired, against any person obligated on a loan guaranteed, insured, or made by the Department of Veterans Affairs under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. ch. 37, or on an acquired loan, or on a vendee account.

[39 FR 26400, July 19, 1974]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    170,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,457
<PP&E>                                         414,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                 175,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,137,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,517
<BONDS>                                        368,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,001
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,137,648
<SALES>                                        188,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,280
<CGS>                                           98,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,114
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.74


 


	
   

  	
  July 2, 2003

  



 


	
  A. Curts Cooke

  c/o Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.

  111 Bauer Drive

  Oakland, NJ 07436

  



 


Dear Curts:


 


As you know, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the
exploration of a possible sale of the Company, although no decision to effect a
sale has been made and there can be no assurance that it will occur or as to
the timing thereof.


 


The Board of Directors believes that your continued service as an
executive and effective participation in the exploration of a possible sale is
important to the Company.  Accordingly,
the Board of Directors has determined that if an unaffiliated purchaser
acquires substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock or assets through
a negotiated transaction on or before December 31, 2003, and you remain
employed by the Company through the consummation of that transaction, you will
be awarded a special bonus of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars
($150,000).  (If for any reason you are
not employed by the Company when the sale is consummated, you will not be
entitled to any payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation
to which you may be entitled from the Company. 
Nothing in this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with
the Company or creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you
as an employee.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Angelica Berrie

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica Berrie

  Chief Executive Officer
```

[107th Congress Public Law 165]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ165.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 128]]

Public Law 107-165
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
3131 South Crater Road in Petersburg, Virginia, as the ``Norman Sisisky 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Apr. 18, 2002 -  [H.R. 2910]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3131 
South Crater Road in Petersburg, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Norman Sisisky Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norman Sisisky Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved April 18, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2910:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 147 (2001):
                                    Oct. 30, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 148 (2002):
                                    Mar. 22, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```