alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 33/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 33 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5831 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 33

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5831 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 033/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7220 — Chiquita Brands International/Fyffes) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 033/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7220 — Chiquita Brands International/Fyffes) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 033/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 033/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |
| 2015/C 033/04 | List of registered and certified credit rating agencies | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 033/02

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 033/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

2015/C 033/04

List of registered and certified credit rating agencies

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 033/05 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 6 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 033/05

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 17.142 Authority to approve sharing agreements, contracts for scarce medical specialist services and contracts for other medical services. The Under Secretary for Health is delegated authority to enter into ( a ) Sharing agreements authorized under 38 U.S.C. 8153 and § 17.240;
( b ) Contracts with schools and colleges of medicine, osteopathy, dentistry, podiatry, optometry, and nursing, clinics, and any other group or individual capable of furnishing such services to provide scarce medical specialist services at Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities (including, but not limited to, services of physicians, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists, nurses, physicians' assistants, expanded function dental auxiliaries, technicians, and other medical support personnel); and
( c ) When a sharing agreement or contract for scarce medical specialist services is not warranted, contracts authorized under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 8153 for medical and ancillary services. The authority under this section generally will be exercised by approval of proposed contracts or agreements negotiated at the health care facility level. Such approval, however, will not be necessary in the case of any purchase order or individual authorization for which authority has been delegated in 48 CFR 801.670-3. All such contracts and agreements will be negotiated pursuant to 48 CFR chapters 1 and 8.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512, 7409, 8153)
[45 FR 6938, Jan. 31, 1980. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 17072, Apr. 9, 1997; 79 FR 54616, Sept. 12, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.654 Active service pay. ( a ) *General.* Pension, compensation, or retirement pay will be discontinued under the circumstances stated in § 3.700(a)(1) for any period for which the veteran received active service pay. For the purposes of this section, active service pay means pay received for active duty, active duty for training or inactive duty training.
( b ) *Active duty or active duty for training.* ( 1 ) Where the veteran receives active service pay as a result of returning to active duty status or active duty for training as described in § 3.6(c), with the exception of annual active duty for training typically performed 15 days each year by reservists and members of the National Guard and Active Duty for Special Work to receive training (see paragraph (c) of this section), the award will be discontinued effective the day preceding reentrance into active duty or active duty for training status. If the exact date is not known, payments will be discontinued effective date of last payment, and the effective date of discontinuance will be adjusted to the day preceding reentrance when the date of reentrance has been ascertained from the service department.
( 2 ) Payments, if otherwise in order, will be resumed effective the day following release from active duty or active duty for training if notice from the Department of Defense of such release or a claim for recommencement of payments is received within one year from the date of such release; otherwise, payments will be resumed effective one year prior to the date of receipt of a new claim. Prior determinations of service connection will not be disturbed except as provided in § 3.105. Compensation will be resumed based on the combined evaluation in effect at the time payments were discontinued. If a reduction in evaluation that lowers the combined evaluation is considered warranted, the provisions of § 3.105(e) will apply. If a disability is incurred or aggravated, or a service-connected disability worsens in the most recent period of service, compensation for that disability or increase in disability cannot be paid unless a claim therefor is filed.
( c ) *Training duty.* Prospective adjustment of awards may be made where the veteran waives his or her Department of Veterans Affairs benefit covering anticipated receipt of active service pay because of expected periods of active duty for training (annual active duty for training typically performed 15 days each year by reservists and members of the National Guard or Active Duty for Special Work to receive training) or inactive duty training. Where readjustment is in order because service pay was not received for expected training duty, retroactive payments may be authorized if a claim for readjustment is received within one year after the end of the fiscal year for which payments were waived.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a) and 5304(c))
[27 FR 11890, Dec. 1, 1962, as amended at 88 FR 86062, Dec. 12, 2023]
41386.

#### WHITLOCK v. INTERSTATE LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY.

Argued July 8, 1965

Decided September 9, 1965.

Felton, Chief Judge.

This case arose out of the same action as *Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Whitlock,*112 Ga. App. 212, ante. The trial court, after directing the verdict for the face amount of the policy in favor of the plaintiff-insured, submitted the issue of bad faith to the jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1.00 for bad faith and $1,000 as attorney’s fees. The court granted the defendant-insurer’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to that portion of the verdict awarding bad faith penalties, to which judgment the plaintiff excepts. *Held:*

In an action to recover penalties and attorney’s fees for the refusal in bad faith of an insurer to pay a claim, the burden of showing that the refusal was made in bad faith is on the insured and a defense going far enough to show reasonable and probable cause for making it would vindicate the good faith of the company as effectually as would a complete defense to the action. *Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Williamson,*110 Ga. App. 557 (139 SE2d 429) by answer to certified question in 220 Ga. 323 (138 SE2d 668). Whether or not the jury finds the defense of the company to the action complete in the new trial granted in the company’s appeal, the evidence, as set out in our ruling on the company’s appeal, infra, was sufficient to show “reasonable and probable cause” in the denial of the claim. There was no evidence that the decedent had been known to drink heavily in the past and that his blood contained enough alcohol, -0.30%, to raise a presumption of intoxication. The trial court erred initially in submitting the issue of bad faith to the jury since there was evidence which showed reasonable and probable cause for the denial of the claim. The court therefore did not err in its judgment granting the judgment n.o.v. in favor of the defendant-insurer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Deen, JJ., concur.*

*236*William Edward Spence,*for plaintiff in error.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Theodore G. Frankel, Lynn A. Downey,*contra.
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Niger

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Niger			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report accessible to the public, including online.  Information on debt obligations was publicly available.  Niger published state-owned enterprise debt information, although not within a reasonable period of time.  Budget documents provided an incomplete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams, with insufficient detail on allocations to and earnings from state-owned enterprises.  The government published revised budgets when revenues and expenditures deviated from initial projections.  The supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence.  It audited the government’s executed budget and made its audit reports publicly available within a reasonable period of time.  The criteria and procedures by which the national government awards contracts or licenses for natural resource extraction were specified in law and regulation, but the government does not appear to have consistently followed applicable laws and regulations in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available. Niger’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- ensuring budget documents include allocations to, earnings from, and debt holdings of state-owned enterprises;
- more accurately estimating budget revenues and expenditures; and
- following in practice applicable laws and procedures for awarding contracts and licenses for natural resource extraction.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Niger 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentNiger

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.405 Filipino veterans and their survivors; benefits at the full-dollar rate. Public Laws 106-377 and 108-183, which provide disability compensation and dependency and indemnity compensation at full-dollar rates to certain Filipino veterans and their survivors, are considered liberalizing laws. As such, the provisions of 38 CFR 3.114(a) apply when determining the effective date of an award. If the requirements of § 3.114(a) are not satisfied, then the effective date of an award of benefits at the full-dollar rate under § 3.42 will be determined as follows: ( a ) *Initial entitlement to full-dollar rate.* The latest of the following: ( 1 ) Date entitlement arose;
( 2 ) Date on which the veteran or survivor first met the residency and citizenship or permanent resident alien status requirements in § 3.42, if VA receives evidence of this within one year of that date; or
( 3 ) Effective date of service connection, provided VA receives evidence that the veteran or survivor meets the residency and citizenship or permanent resident alien status requirements in § 3.42 within one year of the date of notification of the decision establishing service connection.
( b ) *Resumption of full-dollar rate.* ( 1 ) Date the veteran or survivor returned to the United States after an absence of more than 60 consecutive days; or
( 2 ) First day of the calendar year following the year in which the veteran or survivor was absent from the United States for a total of 183 days or more, or the first day after that date that the veteran or survivor returns to the United States.
[71 FR 8221, Feb. 16, 2006]
Retention Bonus dates as of June 27, 2003



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615
Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  

June 27, 2003 
  
 John L. Klag 
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear John: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain
additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between
New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Bank under your new employment
agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $600,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time
other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will
immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of
which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora


	 Joseph R. Ficalora
 President and Chief Executive Officer



  

	 Acknowledged and Agreed:

	
	 /s/ John L. Klag


	 John L. Klag


  
  

 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1189

IGOR BELYAKOV,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:13-cv-03656-DKC)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Igor Belyakov, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Remy, JACKSON 

LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Igor Belyakov appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgement to the defendant in Belyakov’s action alleging 

age discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Belyakov v. Henry M. 

Jackson Found., No. 8:13-cv-03656-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2422 

To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for notifying 

local emergency responders before transporting hazardous materials 

through their jurisdictions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. GONZALEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan 

for notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous materials through their jurisdictions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 

4 A railroad carrier shall transmit to the Secretary of 

5 Transportation, and annually update, a plan for providing 

6 notification to local emergency responders before trans7 porting hazardous materials through their jurisdictions. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2422 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEMONSTRATION. 

2 The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a re3 quirement that railroad carriers periodically demonstrate 

4 to the Secretary that the procedures set forth in the plan 

5 transmitted under section 1 are adequate to provide ap6 propriate notice to local emergency responders. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# Official Journal C 232/17 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 232 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4717 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 232

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4717 September 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 232/1 | Euro exchange rates |

Notice No

Contents

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 232/1

Euro exchange rates

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 232/2 | Amendment to Call FP6-2003-SME-1 (OJ C 307, 17.12.2003) |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 232/2

Amendment to Call FP6-2003-SME-1 (OJ C 307, 17.12.2003)

(OJ C 307, 17.12.2003)

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 48.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Secretary determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
DANIEL W. UHLFELDER,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO 

WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., A 

NATIONAL BANKING 

ASSOCIATION, FOREST LAKES 

COMMUNITY OWNERS' 

ASSOCIATION, INC., A 

FLORIDA NON-PROFIT 

CORPORATION; AND 

UNKNOWN 

SPOUSE/OWNER(S)/TENANT(S) 

IN POSSESSION,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4381

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Walton County.

William P. White, Jr., Judge.

Daniel W. Uhlfelder, pro se, Appellant.

Joseph H. Lang, Jr. and Donald R. Kirk, of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellee.
2

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 

26, 2015, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. Accordingly, the 

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ROBERTS, C. J., SWANSON and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 243 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 

Combat-Related Special Compensation to members of the Armed Forces 

retired for disability with less than 20 years of active military service 

who were awarded the Purple Heart. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Mr. WELLER of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the 

payment of Combat-Related Special Compensation to 

members of the Armed Forces retired for disability with 

less than 20 years of active military service who were 

awarded the Purple Heart. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combat Military Medi5 cally Retired Veteran’s Fairness Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 243 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO 20-YEAR SERVICE REQUIREMENT 

2 FOR MEMBERS AWARDED THE PURPLE 

3 HEART. 

4 (a) ENTITLEMENT.—Section 1413a of title 10, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘GEN7 ERALLY’’ after ‘‘RETIREES’’; 

8 (2) by redesignating subsections (d) through (i) 

9 as subsections (e) through (j), respectively; and 

10 (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol11 lowing new subsection (d): 

12 ‘‘(d) EXCEPTION TO 20-YEAR SERVICE REQUIRE13 MENT FOR PURPLE HEART RECIPIENTS.—In addition to 

14 members described in subsection (c), a member of the uni15 formed services retired under chapter 61 of this title with 

16 less than 20 years of service creditable under section 1405 

17 of this title is an eligible combat-related uniformed serv18 ices retiree for the purposes of subsection (a) if the mem19 ber has a combat-related disability that is attributable to 

20 an injury for which the member was awarded the Purple 

21 Heart. The determination under subsection (b) of the 

22 amount of compensation to be paid to such a member shall 

23 be made without regard to paragraph (3) of such sub24 section.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (d) of section 

26 1413a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:42 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H243.IH H243

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 243 IH

1 section (a)(3), shall apply with respect to payments of 

2 compensation under such section for months beginning on 

3 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS