alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA method for the calculation of external lift, moment, and pressure drag of slender open-nose bodies of revolution at supersonic speedsAn approximate method is presented for the calculation of the external lift, moment, and pressure drag of slender open-nose bodies of revolution of supersonic speeds. The lift, moment, and pressure drag of a typical ram-jet body shape are calculated at Mach numbers 1.45, 1.60, 1.75, and 3.00; and the lift and moment results are compared with available experimental data. The agreement of the calculated lift and moment data with the experimental data is excellent. The pressure-drag comparison was not presented because of the uncertainty of the amount of skin-friction drag present in the experimental results.Document ID19930091887Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOtherAuthorsBrown, Clinton EParker, Hermon MDate AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1945Report/Patent NumberNACA-TR-808Accession Number93R21177Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930091887.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Official Journal C 80/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.080.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 80 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 523 April 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.080.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 80

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 523 April 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 080/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2009/C 080/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 4 |
| 2009/C 080/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 080/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2009/C 080/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

4

2009/C 080/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

7

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 080/04 | Euro exchange rates | 10 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 080/04

Euro exchange rates

10

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 080/05 | Call for applications 2009 — Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013) (1) | 11 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 080/06 | Notice for the attention of Mr Uthman Omar Mahmoud concerning his inclusion in the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban | 12 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2009/C 080/05

Call for applications 2009 — Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013) (1)

11

OTHER ACTS

Commission

2009/C 080/06

Notice for the attention of Mr Uthman Omar Mahmoud concerning his inclusion in the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 19.33 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,413
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         174,565
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,095
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     54,986
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        148,388
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,318
<DEPOSITS>                                     203,295
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,402
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,061
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,718
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 224,318
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,078
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,763
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   235
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,076
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,876
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,935
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,141
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      270
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (13)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    818
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         818
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       577
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.19
<LOANS-NON>                                        862
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    32
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    265
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,696
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       91
<RECOVERIES>                                        35
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,910
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,251
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            659


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2435 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to provide for criminal 

liability for willful safety standard violations resulting in the death of 

contract employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas (for himself, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, 

Mr. LYNCH, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, 

Mr. HARE, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Ms. DELAURO, and Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to provide 

for criminal liability for willful safety standard violations 

resulting in the death of contract employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection for 

5 All Workers Act’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2435 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE. 

2 Section 17(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

3 Act (29 U.S.C. 666(e)) is amended by inserting ‘‘including 

4 any individual employed under contract,’’ after ‘‘em5 ployee,’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4337 Conformance of loan instruments.

Regulations issued under 38 U.S.C. chapter 37 and in effect on the date of any loan which is submitted and accepted or approved for a guaranty or for insurance thereunder, shall govern the rights, duties, and liabilities of the parties to such loan and any provisions of the loan instruments inconsistent with such regulations are hereby amended and supplemented to conform thereto.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4207 Manufactured home standards. To qualify for purchase with a guaranteed loan a manufactured home must: ( a ) Meet the following dimensional requirements. ( 1 ) A single-wide unit must be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide and have a minimum floor area of four hundred (400) square feet.
( 2 ) A double-wide unit, when assembled, must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide and have a minimum floor area of seven hundred (700) square feet.
( b ) Be so constructed as to be towed on its own chassis and undercarriage and/or independent undercarriage;
( c ) Contain living facilities for year around occupancy by one family, including permanent provisions for heat, sleeping, cooking, and sanitation; and
( d ) Comply with the specifications in effect at the time the loan is made that are prescribed by the Secretary.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3712(h)(1))
[36 FR 1253, Jan. 27, 1971, as amended at 40 FR 13213, Mar. 25, 1975; 44 FR 22725, Apr. 17, 1979; 56 FR 9855, Mar. 8, 1991]
§ 21.5062 Date of disenrollment. An individual will be disenrolled effective: ( a ) The date the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Service Department determines he or she has ceased to be legally entitled to participate; or
( b ) The date the individual negotiates the check which represents a refund of his or her remaining contributions to the fund, whichever is earlier.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3221(d))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                           3,836
<SECURITIES>                                    26,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,859)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,435
<PP&E>                                          23,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,257
<SALES>                                         34,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,563
<CGS>                                           25,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (228)     <F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,870)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,062)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,808)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
<FN>
<F1>NET OF INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### CORONA COAL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

[57 C. Cls. 607; 263 U. S. 537]

Judgment was rendered in the court' below in favor of the United States. Plaintiff appealed, and the *appeal was dismissed,*the Supreme Court deciding :•

Where coal, requisitioned by the' Fuel Administration for the Railroad Administration, was paid for by the latter at prices fixed in contracts between certain carriers, which it took over, - and the- coal owner,

*Bold: (a)*That the owner’s claims against the Railroad Administration, reserved in the requisition, for the difference between the price paid and ihe greater price then fixed generally by the Fuel Administration, were causes of action arising out of the possession, use and operation of the carriers by the President, within Transportation Act, section 206a, authorizing suit against the agent appointed by him.

(6) Under Judicial Code, section 154, the institution and pendency of such actions in the district court prevents prosecution of an appeal pending here from an earlier judgment of the Court of Claims rejecting a claim against the United States for the same cause.

(e) This prohibition of section 154 can not be avoided upon the ground that the later actions v-ere brought to avoid the time limitation of the Transportation Act.

Mr. Justice Sutherland

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 7, 1924.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

p1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143952

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 14 3952 COA: 304924 Kent CC: 10-001549-FH RICHARD JUNIOR DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 1, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
§ 7.2 Certification of military service. ( a ) A statement over the signature of the Commanding Officer or a commissioned officer of equal or higher rank than the insured, on the insured's application, may be accepted as a certification that the insured is a person in the military service.
( b ) If the insured is unavailable because of service, the application may be certified by the person who has custody of the insured's service record.
( c ) If an application is submitted by a person designated by the insured or by the insured's beneficiary, the Department of Veterans Affairs will obtain from the service department evidence that the insured is a person in the military service.
(Authority 50 U.S.C. app. 547)
[61 FR 29026, June 7, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      3,480,000
<SECURITIES>                                  302,000         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,805,700 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,814,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          69,200
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,737,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,814,000
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              188,300
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (51,100) 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               164,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                  168,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
§ 20.904 Rule 904. Remand or referral for further action. ( a ) *Remand.* If further evidence, clarification of the evidence, correction of a procedural defect, or any other action is essential for a proper appellate decision, a Veterans Law Judge or panel of Veterans Law Judges shall remand the case to the agency of original jurisdiction, specifying the action to be undertaken.
( b ) *Referral.* The Board shall refer to the agency of original jurisdiction for appropriate consideration and handling in the first instance all claims reasonably raised by the record that have not been initially adjudicated by the agency of original jurisdiction, except for claims over which the Board has original jurisdiction.
( c ) *Remand for a Statement of the Case.* In cases before the Board in which a claimant has timely filed a Notice of Disagreement with a determination of the agency of original jurisdiction on a claim, but the record reflects that the agency of original jurisdiction has not subsequently granted the claim in full and has not furnished the claimant with a Statement of the Case, the Board shall remand the claim to the agency of original jurisdiction with instructions to prepare and issue a Statement of the Case in accordance with the provisions of part 19, subpart B of this chapter. A remand for a Statement of the Case is not required if the claimant, consistent with the withdrawal requirements of § 19.55 of this chapter, withdraws the Notice of Disagreement.
( d ) *Exceptions.* A remand or referral to the agency of original jurisdiction is not necessary for any of the following purposes: ( 1 ) Clarifying a procedural matter before the Board, including the appellant's choice of representative before the Board, the issues on appeal, or requests for a hearing before the Board;
( 2 ) Considering law not already considered by the agency of original jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, statutes, regulations, and court decisions;
( 3 ) Reviewing additional evidence received by the Board, if, pursuant to Rule 1305 (§ 20.1305(c) of this part), the appellant or the appellant's representative waives the right to initial consideration by the agency of original jurisdiction, or if the Board determines that the benefit or benefits to which the evidence relates may be fully allowed on appeal;
( 4 ) Requesting an opinion under Rule 906 (§ 20.906 of this part);
( 5 ) Supplementing the record with a recognized medical treatise; or
( 6 ) Considering a matter over which the Board has original jurisdiction.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7103(c); 38 U.S.C. 7104(a), 7105 (2016)).
[67 FR 3104, Jan. 23, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 53808, Sept. 3, 2004; 76 FR 17547, Mar. 30, 2011. Redesignated at 84 FR 177, Jan. 18, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019; 84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6085

LARON A. MOTEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN OF THE AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-1087)

Submitted: April 7, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laron A. Moten, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 Moten does not challenge on appeal the district court’s

dismissal of two claims in a prior order for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction or the court’s dismissal of one claim on procedural

default grounds. Moten has waived appellate review of these claims

by failing to raise them in his informal brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

2

PER CURIAM:

Laron A. Moten, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000).* An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000);

see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moten has not

satisfied this standard. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED