alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.6015 Claims and elections. ( a ) *Claims by veterans under age 45 for whom participation in an evaluation is required.* A veteran under age 45 who is awarded pension during the program period will be scheduled for an evaluation to determine whether achievement of a vocational goal is reasonably feasible, unless it is determined that the veteran is unable to participate in an evaluation for reasons beyond his or her control. If VA, as a result of the evaluation, determines that achievement of a vocational goal is reasonably feasible, the veteran may elect to pursue a vocational training program. To make this election, the veteran must file a claim, in a form prescribed by VA, for services under this temporary program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b); Pub. L. 100-687, Pub. L. 100-687, Pub. L. 101-237).
( b ) *Claims by qualified veterans for whom participation in an evaluation is not required.* Qualified veterans in the following categories will be provided an evaluation if they request assistance under the temporary program, and are found to have good employment potential. These veterans include: ( 1 ) Veterans age 45 and more who are awarded pension during the program period;
( 2 ) Veterans awarded pension prior to the beginning of the program period on February 1, 1985, who meet the conditions contained in § 21.6005(c) of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b), Pub. L. 100-687, Pub. L. 101-237).
( c ) *Filing a claim.* A veteran in one of the categories identified in paragraph (b) of this section must file a claim in the form prescribed by VA in order to be considered for an evaluation of his or her ability to achieve a vocational goal through participation in this temporary program. The veteran's claim is considered a request for both the evaluation, and if achievement of a vocational goal is found reasonably feasible, for participation in the vocational training program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524, Pub. L. 100-687).
( d ) *Claims following failure to timely pursue a vocational training program.* ( 1 ) If a veteran for whom achievement of a vocational goal is found reasonably feasible does not undertake a vocational training program within the time limits specified in § 21.32, he or she must file an original or reopened claim, as appropriate, in a form prescribed by VA in order to be considered for such services to determine if achievement of the previous vocational goal or a new vocational goal is reasonably feasible.
( 2 ) If a veteran has been placed in discontinued case status by the VA, he or she must file a new claim in a form prescribed by the VA to reopen the case. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b))
( e ) *Informal claims.* Informal claims shall be governed by § 21.31 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(a))
( f ) *Time limit.* The time limit for making a claim to pursue a vocational training program shall be governed by § 21.32 of this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(a))
[53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 17271, Apr. 24, 1990; 56 FR 21448, May 9, 1991]
IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

JAMES SMITH §

§

Petitioner §

§

VS §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

§

Appellee §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 11 -1 2 -00 095

- CR

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes James Smith, appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves

for an extension of time of 45 days to file a Petition for Discretionary Review, and for good

cause shows the following:

1. The deadline for filing a Petition for Discretionary Review is April 10, 2015.

2. The length of the extension sought is 45 days.

3. No previous extensions have been requested.

4. Counsel for peti tioner has been preparing a brief for Jonathan Sanchez vs. State of

Texas; Court of Appeal No. 11-14 -00290 -CR. Further, counsel for petitioner has been involved PD-0405-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/10/2015 11:40:08 AM

Accepted 4/15/2015 3:39:16 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERKin the preparation of a jury trial, Cause No. 7505 , entitled State of Texas v. Jeremy Wade Grimes

which is set to begin on April 14, 2015. Counsel for petitioner was involved in the preparation

and jury trial, Sta te of Texas vs. Narada Norman; Cause N o . 11149

- D in the 350 th Judicial

District of Taylor Co unty which began on March 16, 2015.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED

, petitioner respectfully requests an

extension of 45 days, i.e. until May 25, 2015 , to file a Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

Parker & Blizzard, P.L.L.C.

702

- C Hickory

Abilene, TX 79601

Tel: (325) 480

- 2903

Fax: (866) 651

- 2320

By: 

# /s / Jacob Blizzard

Jacob Blizzard

State Bar No. 24068558

Attorney for James Smith

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 10, 2015 , a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing document was served on the Taylor County District Attorney's Office, Taylor County,

Texas, by facsimile transmission to 325

- 674

- 1306.



# /s/ Jacob Blizzard

Jacob BlizzardIN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

JAMES SMITH §

§

Petitioner §

§

VS §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

§

Appellee §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 11

- 1 2

- 00 095

- CR

ORDER FOR A SETTING

On , 2015 , the Defendant filed a Motion to Extend Time to File

Brief in Support of Petition for Discretionary Review. The Court finds that the party is entitled

to a hearing on this matter, and it is THEREFORE ORDERED that a hearing on this motion is

set for , at

.

Signed on

.

JUDGE PRESIDINGIN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

JAMES SMITH §

§

Petitioner §

§

VS §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

§

Appellee §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 11

- 1 2

- 00 095

- CR

O R D E R

On , 2015 , came on to be considered James Smith 's Motion to

Extend Time to File Brief in Support of Petition for Discretionary Review, and said motion is

hereby

(Granted) (Denied)

JUDGE PRESIDING
**Exhibit10.1**

**Candela Corporation**

**Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan**

CandelaCorporation’s Second Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan (the “1998 Stock Plan”)is hereby amended as follows:

1.                                       Thesecond sentence of Section 4 of the 1998 Stock Plan is amended and restated inits entirety as follows:

“The aggregatenumber of shares which may be issued pursuant to the Plan is 7,800,000, subjectto adjustment as provided in paragraph 13.”

2.                                       Exceptas modified hereby, the 1998 Stock Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

3.                                       Thisamendment may be memorialized as a separate amendment to the 1998 Stock Plan orincluded in an amended and restated 1998 Stock Plan.

----
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

C-4 Crack Cocaine

An Investigation of the Belated

Production of Documents in the

Oklahoma City Bombing Case

Office of the Inspector General

March 19, 2002

DRAFT
# Official Journal L 374/27 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 374 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4927 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 374

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4927 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Directive 2006/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the regulation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 3 , Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (codified version) (1) | 1 |
| | * | Directive 2006/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage of goods by road (codified version) (1) | 5 |
| | * | Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits (codified version) (1) | 10 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Directive 2006/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the regulation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 3 , Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (codified version) (1)

1

*

Directive 2006/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage of goods by road (codified version) (1)

5

*

Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits (codified version) (1)

10

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence (OJ L 196, 2.8.2003) | 20 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence (OJ L 196, 2.8.2003)

20

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2444 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide that it is especially 

appropriate to display the flag on Father’s Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. TIAHRT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide that it 

is especially appropriate to display the flag on Father’s Day. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring America’s 

5 Fathers Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDING OF CONGRESS. 

7 Upon the recommendation of the students of Roo8 sevelt Middle School in Coffeyville, Kansas, the Congress 

9 finds that it is appropriate to recognize fathers by dis10 playing the flag on Father’s Day. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2444 IH

1 SEC. 3. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON FATHER’S DAY. 

2 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code. is amend3 ed by inserting ‘‘Father’s Day, third Sunday in June;’’ 

4 after ‘‘Flag Day, June 14;’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
§ 17.715 Grant agreements. ( a ) *General.* After a grantee is awarded a grant in accordance with § 17.705(b) or § 17.705(d), VA will draft a grant agreement to be executed by VA and the grantee. Upon execution of the grant agreement, VA will obligate the approved amount to the grantee. The grant agreement will provide that: ( 1 ) The grantee must operate the program in accordance with the provisions of this section and the grant application.
( 2 ) If a grantee's application identified a subrecipient, such subrecipient must operate the program in accordance with the provisions of this section and the grant application.
( 3 ) If a grantee's application identified that funds will be used to procure or operate vehicles to directly provide transportation services, the following requirements must be met: ( i ) Title to the vehicles must vest solely in the grantee or identified subrecipient, or with leased vehicles in an identified lender.
( ii ) The grantee or identified subrecipient must, at a minimum, provide motor vehicle liability insurance for the vehicles to the same extent they would insure vehicles procured with their own funds.
( iii ) All vehicle operators must be licensed in a U.S. State or Territory to operate such vehicles.
( iv ) Vehicles must be safe and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
( v ) Vehicles must be operated in accordance with applicable Department of Transportation regulations concerning transit requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
( b ) *Additional requirements.* Grantees and identified subrecipients are subject to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards under 2 CFR part 200, and subject to 2 CFR parts 25 and 170, if applicable.
(Authority: Sec. 307, Pub. L. 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 501)
[78 FR 19593, Apr. 2, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 43322, July 22, 2015]
THE FIRST CONNECTICUT CAPITAL CORPORATION


                                     Exhibit


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the Quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") by The First Connecticut
Capital Corporation (the "Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

           1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended, and

           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Registrant.



/S/ LAURENCE R. YURDIN                  /S/ DAVID ENGELSON
------------------------------          -------------------------------
Laurence R. Yurdin                      David Engelson
President and Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer
--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------





<PAGE>
F15 Form 10-K EX 10.33






Exhibit 10.33
SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
Compensation: Non-employee directors shall receive the following remuneration: 
	
			
	Cash retainer
	 
	$85,000

	Lead Director retainer, if any
	 
	$25,000

	Non-Executive Chairman retainer
	 
	$150,000

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee fee
	 
	$10,000

	Audit Committee and Leadership Development and Compensation Committee fee
	 
	$15,000 per committee

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair fee
	 
	$20,000

	Audit Committee Chair and Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Chair fee
	 
	$25,000 per committee

	Deferred Stock Payment
	 
	$115,000




Directors may elect to defer payment of their fees under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Under this Plan, a non-employee director may elect to have payment of all or a portion of the director’s fees deferred and credited to a deferred stock account or into a deferred cash account. Non-employee directors who were former employees of SUPERVALU are not eligible to participate in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan and instead receive an equivalent amount in cash compensation. If a director chooses to defer fees into a deferred stock account, SUPERVALU then credits the director’s account with an additional amount equal to 10 percent of the amount of fees the director has elected to defer and contributes the total amount in the director’s account to a grantor (“rabbi”) trust that uses the amount to purchase shares of SUPERVALU common stock, which are then allocated to an account for the director under the trust. Each director is entitled to direct the trustee to vote all shares allocated to the director’s account in the trust. The common stock in each director’s deferred stock account will be distributed to the director after the director leaves the Board, in accordance with the directors’ payment election. Until that time, the trust assets remain subject to the claims of our creditors. Dividends paid on the shares of common stock held in each of the directors’ accounts are used to purchase additional shares for these accounts each quarter. If a director chooses to defer all or a portion of fees into a deferred cash account, interest is payable on the amount of deferred cash compensation at an annual rate equal to the twelve-month rolling average of Moody’s Corporate Average Bond Index for the twelve-month period ending in the month of October preceding the first day of the calendar year. Payment in cash is made from the cash account after the director leaves the Board.
#### § 21.8280 Effective date of induction into a vocational training program.

Subject to the limitations in § 21.8022, the date an eligible child is inducted into a vocational training program will be the date the child first begins to receive training, services, or assistance under an individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), (d), 1814)
#### Herman Horenburger et al., Respondents, *v.*Lazarus Levy, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

A. L. Phillips, for appellant.

A. J. Westermayr, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

In view of the possibilities, the conflict of evidence and the unreliability of the plaintiffs’ memory as evidenced by the variances between the allegations of their verified complaint and their testimony, it seems that the only writing which bore upon the arrangements between the parties should have been controlling so far as its contents are concerned. I refer to the receipt in full. The judgment should be modified so as to be for $227, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Present: Teuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment modified, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.
----

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Freiburg — Germany) — Bernd Voigt

(Case C-83/05) (1)

(Completion of the internal market - Approximation of laws - Motor vehicles - Community type-approval procedure - Directive 70/156/EEC - Scope - Classification according to the technical characteristics of vehicle types - Effect on vehicle classification of a national regulation governing road traffic)

(2006/C 224/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Freiburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bernd Voigt

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Freiburg — Interpretation of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (OJ, English Special Edition 1970 (I), p. 96), as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC of 18 June 1992 (OJ 1992 L 225 p. 1) — Registration by a Member State of a category M1 vehicle (passenger car) covered by Community type-approval — Whether the national authorities may penalise the driver of such a vehicle for road traffic offences which relate to goods vehicles — Motorway speed limits applicable solely to goods vehicles

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC of 18 June 1992, is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national rules which provide that a vehicle such as the one in question in the main proceedings is not subject to the national speed limits for passenger cars, even where that vehicle has been registered as a passenger car on the basis of a Community type-approval granted pursuant to that directive.

----

(1)OJ C 82 of 2.4.2005.

----
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4509 Joint loans. ( a ) No loan will be made unless an eligible veteran is the sole principal obligor, or such veteran and spouse or eligible veteran co-applicant are the principal obligors thereon, nor unless such veteran alone, or together with a spouse or eligible veteran co-applicant, acquire the entire fee simple or other permissible estate in the realty for the acquisition of which the loan was obtained. Nothing in this section shall preclude other parties from becoming liable as comaker, endorser, guarantor, or surety.
( b ) Notwithstanding that an applicant and spouse or other co-applicant are both eligible veterans and will be jointly and severally liable as borrowers, the original principal amount of the loan may not exceed the maximum permissible under § 36.4503(a). In any event the loan may not exceed $33,000.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3711(d)(2)(A) and (3))
[43 FR 60460, Dec. 28, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated financial statements of CML Group, Inc. for the six months ended
February 1, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      38,434,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,362,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,888,000
<INVENTORY>                                 43,491,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           114,220,000
<PP&E>                                      94,502,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              41,298,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,520,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,878,000
<BONDS>                                     41,593,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,279,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,597,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,520,000
<SALES>                                    182,339,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           182,339,000
<CGS>                                       81,578,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               81,578,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               622,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             756,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (28,539,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (9,703,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,836,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,836,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>