alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Ce1tifications  I, Mike Mckeever, ce1tify that:  1. I have reviewed this repo1t on F01m 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Tmst 202 l-N3 (the "Exchange Act periodic repo1ts"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic repo1ts, taken as a whole, do not contain any untme statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessa1y to make the statements made, in light of the circU111Stances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this repo1t; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this repo1t is included in the Exchange Act periodic repo11s; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic repo1ts, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation repo1ts on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this repo1t in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as othe1wise disclosed in this repo1t. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such repo1ts have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the ce1tifications above, I have reasonably relied on info1mation provided to me by the following  unaffiliated patties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Isl Mike Mckeever  Mike Mckeever  President  Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC  (senior officer in charge of securitization)
§ 21.6501 Overview. ( a ) *Purpose.* The temporary program for trial work periods and vocational rehabilitation is intended to test the extent to which a veteran, who has been awarded a VA compensation rating of total disability by reason of inability to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disability, may benefit from vocational rehabilitation services which may be authorized under 33 U.S.C. chapter 31, and 38 U.S.C. 1163. See §§ 3.340 and 3.341 of this title.
( b ) *Chapter 31 evaluations.* All veterans participating in this temporary program are to be evaluated to determine whether: ( 1 ) They are eligible for and entitled to receive assistance under chapter 31; and
( 2 ) Achievement of a vocational goal is reasonably feasible. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163; Pub. L. 100-687).
( c ) *Applicability of chapter 31 provisions.* The provisions of §§ 21.1 through 21.430, generally applicable to veterans eligible for benefits under chapter 31, apply except as added to or modified by the provisions of the following sections. Participants not found eligible for chapter 31 benefits may nevertheless receive counseling services under 38 U.S.C. 3104(a)(2) and placement and postplacement services under 38 U.S.C. 3104(a)(5).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163)
[51 FR 19333, May 29, 1986. Redesignated at 53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 17272, Apr. 24, 1990]
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

Red Hat, Inc. 
 Clawback
Policy 
 It is the policy of Red Hat, Inc. (the “Corporation”) to require, to the extent permitted by law, any “Covered Executive”
who engaged in “Misconduct” that resulted in a “Financial Restatement” to repay to the Corporation, in cash and upon demand, any “Excess Proceeds” from “Incentive Compensation” received by the Covered
Executive during any “Clawback Period”. The repayment of Excess Proceeds is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other relief available to the Corporation due to the Covered Executive’s Misconduct. This policy shall be effective
June 1, 2009, and apply to Incentive Compensation that is both approved by the Committee and awarded on or after that date. 
 “Clawback Period”
means the twelve-month period following the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of any financial statements that are the subject of a Financial Restatement. 

“Covered Executive” means any participant in the Corporation’s Executive Variable Compensation Plan. 

“Excess Proceeds” means (i) any portion of Incentive Compensation paid or distributed to a Covered Executive during a Clawback Period that is
greater than the amount that would have been paid or distributed if calculated based on any restated financial results and (ii) the net proceeds from gains on any sale or disposition of the Corporation’s common stock distributed pursuant to
incentive compensation arrangements, if the sale or disposition was effected in a Clawback Period. 
 “Financial Restatement” means any material
restatement, whether required by law or determined by the Board of Directors to be in the best interests of the Corporation, of financial statements included in a filing by the Corporation with the SEC because of noncompliance, due to Misconduct,
with financial reporting requirements under federal securities laws. 
 “Incentive Compensation” means any cash or equity-based compensation if
the payment, grant or vesting of such compensation was predicated on the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a Financial Restatement. 

“Misconduct” means an act of embezzlement, fraud, willful misconduct or breach of fiduciary duty, as determined by the Committee or another
committee of independent directors and ratified by the Board of Directors.
#### § 21.5900 Administration of benefits program—chapter 107, title 10 U.S.C.

In administering benefits payable under Chapter 107, Title 10 U.S.C, VA will be bound by the provisions of the §§ 21.5700, 21.5800 and 21.5900 series of regulations.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2144(c))
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
                       
<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<CASH>                           6,282
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   27,574
<ALLOWANCES>                       337
<INVENTORY>                     23,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                61,417
<PP&E>                          50,822
<DEPRECIATION>                  24,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  88,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           21,612
<BONDS>                              0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           594
<OTHER-SE>                      64,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    88,645
<SALES>                         43,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   34,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 5,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,538
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,264
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .26
        

</TABLE>
July 1, 2015

Mr. M i chael O ’ Conner

9 121 Aspen Ave, NE

Albuquerque, NM 87112

Dear Mr. O ’ Conner :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26, 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

2483 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sec tions of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your reques t.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before th e proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2023167EN.01000101.xml

| 11.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2022-2023 SESSION

Sittings of 21 to 24 November 2022

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. FLYNN THOMPSON, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

May 17, 1910.

DRAMSHOP KEEPER: Local Option Election: Conviction After Adoption of Local Option Law for Offense Committed Before Its Adoption. This case involves the same questions of law determined in State v. Walker, 129 Mo. App. 371, and is determined in conformity with the opinion therein rendered.

Appeal from Howell Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *W. N. Evans,*J udge.

*537Affirmed.

*Van Wormer, Hogan & Delaney*for appellant.

*J. L. Bess*for respondent.

GOODE, J.

This is an indictment against defendant for an illegal sale of liquor to a minor. It was submitted to the court without the introduction of evidence on an agreed statement of facts. Defendant admitted he sold the liquor as charged and set up a defense that he should not be convicted because, after the sale and after the indictment, but prior to the trial, the Dramshop Law had been repealed in Howell county by an election held under the local option statutes at which the voters voted against the sale of liquors in the county. This case involves the same question of law determined by this court in State v. Walker, 129 Mo. App. 371, 108 S. W. 615, and certified to the Supreme Court, where it was decided as we decided it, our opinion being adopted. The present case has been held to await the decision of the Walker case by the Supreme Court, and must be determined in conformity with the opinion therein rendered. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4220 Substantive and procedural requirements; waiver. ( a ) Notwithstanding any requirement, condition, or limitation stated in or imposed by the regulations concerning the guaranty of manufactured home loans to veterans, the Under Secretary for Benefits, or the Executive Director, Loan Guaranty Service, within the limitations and conditions prescribed by the Secretary, is hereby authorized, if the Under Secretary for Benefits or Executive Director, Loan Guaranty Service finds the interests of the Government are not adversely affected, to relieve undue prejudice to a debtor, holder, or other person, which might otherwise result, provided no such action may be taken which would impair the vested rights of any person affected thereby. If such requirement, condition, or limitation is of an administrative or procedural (not substantive) nature, any employee designated in § 36.4221 is hereby authorized to grant similar relief if the designated employee finds the failure or error of the lender was due to misunderstanding or mistake and that the interests of the Government are not adversely affected. Provisions of the regulations considered to be of an administrative or procedural (nonsubstantive) nature are limited to the following: ( 1 ) The requirement in § 36.4209(b) that a lender originating a loan under a certificate of commitment report the loan for issuance of guaranty evidence within 60 days following actual payment of the full proceeds of the loan. In such cases it is not necessary that a finding be made that the loan is not in default.
( 2 ) The requirements in § 36.4209(h) of this part concerning the giving of notice in assumption cases under 38 U.S.C. 3714. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3714)
( 3 ) The requirement in § 36.4279 that a holder promptly forward an advice of the terms of any agreement effecting a reamortization or extension of a loan.
( 4 ) The requirement in § 36.4280 concerning the giving of notice of default.
( 5 ) The requirement in § 36.4280 that a holder give 30 days advance notice of its intention to foreclose or repossess the security.
( 6 ) The requirement in § 36.4282 that a holder give notice of repossession of personal property within 10 days after such repossession has occurred.
( 7 ) The requirement in § 36.4210(a) that a lender obtain the prior approval of the Secretary before closing a joint loan if the lender or class of lenders is approved by the Secretary to close loans on the automatic basis pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3712(c)(1). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3712(c)(1))
( b ) No waiver, consent, or approval required or authorized by the regulations concerning guaranty of loans to veterans shall be valid unless in writing signed by the Secretary or the employee designated in § 36.4221.
[36 FR 1253, Jan. 27, 1971, as amended at 46 FR 43670, Aug. 31, 1981; 49 FR 13352, Apr. 4, 1984; 55 FR 37473, Sept. 12, 1990; 61 FR 28058, June 4, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.39

                                    ADDENDUM

THIS ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT is made this first day of 29th day of May 2003,
and entered into by and between J & Lowtree Investors, LLC. ("Landlord") and
Simulations Plus, Inc. ("Tenant").

                                    RECITALS

A. Landlord and Tenant have entered into a written lease dated May 14, 1998 the
("lease") and Addendum dated July 7, 1998, and February 26, 2001 ("Addendum"),
whereby Landlord leased to Simulations Plus, Inc. ("Tenant') and Tenant leased
from Landlord premises located in the County of Los Angeles, State of
California, particularly described in the lease.

B. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the lease.

NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals of fact and for valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Landlord
and Tenant agree as follows:

         1.       Tenant and Landlord agree to extend the ending date of the
                  lease until September 6, 2005. Both parties Acknowledge that
                  Tenant has no remaining options.
         2.       Starting September 7, 2003 the base rental rate shall increase
                  annually by four (4) percent.
         3.       Not withstanding any provisions in the lease to the contrary:
         4.       Except as set forth above, the lease shall remain unmodified
                  and in full force an effect.
         5.       This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
                  of Landlord and Tenant and their respective successors,
                  assigns and personal representatives.

      "TENANT"
SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.


   /S/ WALT WOLTOSZ
--------------------------
WALT WOLTOSZ
PRESIDENT & CEO

DATED 06/10/03



        "LANDLORD"
J & LOWTREE INVESTORS, LLC


     /S/ ROB MARTIN
--------------------------
ROB MARTIN
MANAGING MEMBER

DATED 06/14/03
#### § 70.2 Definitions.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 10036, Feb. 16, 2023.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 10037, Feb. 16, 2023.

###### Cross Reference

These amendments were delayed until Feb. 16, 2025, at 88 FR 90120, Dec. 29, 2023.

For purposes of this part:

*Attendant* means an individual traveling with a beneficiary who is eligible for beneficiary travel and requires the aid and/or physical assistance of another person.

*Beneficiary* means a person determined eligible for VHA benefits.

*Claimant* means a veteran who received services (or his/her guardian) or the hospital, clinic, or community resource that provided the services, or the person other than the veteran who paid for the services.

*Clinician* means a Physician, Physician Assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP), Psychologist, or other independent licensed practitioner.

*Emergency treatment* means treatment for a condition of such a nature that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected that delay in seeking immediate medical attention would have been hazardous to life or health (this standard would be met if there were an emergency medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) that a prudent layperson who possesses an average knowledge of health and medicine could reasonably expect the absence of immediate medical attention to result in placing the health of the individual in serious jeopardy, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part).

*Irregular discharge* means the release of a competent patient from a VA or VA-authorized hospital, nursing home, or domiciliary care due to: refusal, neglect or obstruction of examination or treatment; leaving without the approval of the treating health care clinician; or disorderly conduct and discharge is the appropriate disciplinary action.

*Special mode of transportation* means an ambulance, ambulette, air ambulance, wheelchair van, or other mode of transportation specially designed to transport disabled persons (this would not include a mode of transportation not specifically designed to transport disabled persons, such as a bus, subway, taxi, train, or airplane). A modified, privately-owned vehicle, with special adaptive equipment and/or capable of transporting disabled persons is not a special mode of transportation for the purposes of this part.

*United States* means each of the several States, Territories, and possessions of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

*VA* means the Department of Veterans Affairs.

*VA-authorized health care facility* means a non-VA health care facility where VA has approved care for an eligible beneficiary at VA expense.

*VA facility* means VA Medical Center (VAMC), VA Outpatient Clinic (OPC), or VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC).

*VHA* means the Veterans Health Administration, a principal unit within VA.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 111, 501, 1701, 1714, 1720, 1728, 1782, 1783, E.O. 11302)
#### § 6.20 Jurisdiction.

The Insurance Claims Sections are vested with exclusive jurisdiction in determining the liability of the United States and the United States Government Life Insurance Fund for waiver of payment of premiums, payment of total, total permanent disability, and death insurance benefits under United States Government life insurance and to determine the liability of the United States and the National Service Life Insurance Fund for waiver of payment of premiums due to total disability, payment of total disability insurance benefits, and death insurance benefits under National Service life insurance.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1944)

[27 FR 9604, Sept. 28, 1962, as amended at 48 FR 1965, Jan. 17, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
# Official Journal C 142/22 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 142 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5922 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 142

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5922 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 142/1 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 142/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 13 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 142/1

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 142/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

13

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 142/3 | State aid — Spain — State aid SA.35818 (2012/CP) — Alleged State aid to Iberpotash — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 18 |
| 2016/C 142/4 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38613 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Alleged aid to Ilva in A.S. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 37 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 142/3

State aid — Spain — State aid SA.35818 (2012/CP) — Alleged State aid to Iberpotash — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

18

2016/C 142/4

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38613 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Alleged aid to Ilva in A.S. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

37

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN