alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11


 


Amendment
No. 1 to:


 


Riverwood
Holding, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan


 


Riverwood
Holding, Inc. Supplemental Long-Term Incentive Plan


 


Riverwood
Holding, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan


 


1.  Purpose of
the Amendment.  Riverwood
Holding Inc. (“Riverwood”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of March 25, 2003, with Riverwood
Acquisition SUB LLC and Graphic Packaging International Corporation
(“Graphic”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Graphic will become a wholly
owned subsidiary of Riverwood at the time that certificates of merger are duly
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State and the Colorado Secretary of State
or at such subsequent time as Riverwood and Graphic shall agree and as shall be
specified in the certificates of merger (such date and time the merger becomes
effective being the “Effective Time”). In connection with the merger, Riverwood
has agreed to amend the Riverwood Holding, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, the
Riverwood Holding, Inc. Supplemental Long-Term Incentive Plan, and the
Riverwood Holding, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the
“Plans”) to preclude the grant of any award under the Plans after the Effective
Time.


 


2.  Amendment.  No further awards may be granted under the Plans
after the Effective Time.
#### Sigmund Biber, Respondent, *v.*Barbara Schmidt, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon a trial had without a jury.

Action upon a promissory note.

The answer was a general denial; failure to give notice of dishonor of the note; lack of consideration and fraud.

Carl L. Schurz, for appellant.

P. O. Taiman, for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

In order to hold the defendant liable as indorser of the promissory note in suit, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that notice of its dishonor was given to her. The Negotiable Instruments Law, General Laws, chap. L, § 160. The record fails to disclose any proof whatever with respect to this essential fact. The plaintiff insists that such evidence is not required, in view of the provisions of section 923 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that the certificate of the notary public shall be presumptive evidence of the facts certified by him, but the difficulty with this position is that the certificate of the notary in the case at bar merely certifies to the presentment and protest of the note, and is silent as to the service of notice of dishonor. Hence, we cannot indulge in the presumption that such notice was given.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Amit Joshi, Chief Financial Officer of Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Apollo Debt Solutions BDC (the “registrant”);




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: March 16, 2023



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Amit Joshi         
|    | Amit Joshi             
|    | Chief Financial Officer





---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40143

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN BISHOP, 

a/k/a Willie Bruce Allen,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-99-CR-97-1

--------------------

August 8, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathan

Bishop, a/k/a Willie Bruce Allen, has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Bishop has received a copy of counsel's motion

and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
No. 00-40143 

-2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.107 Awards where not all dependents apply.

Except as provided in § 3.251(a)(4), in any case where claim has not been filed by or on behalf of all dependents who may be entitled, the awards (original or amended) for those dependents who have filed claim will be made for all periods at the rates and in the same manner as though there were no other dependents. However, if the file reflects the existence of other dependents who have not filed claim and there is potential entitlement to benefits for a period prior to the date of filing claim, the award to a person who has filed claim will be made at the rate which would be payable if all dependents were receiving benefits. If at the expiration of the period allowed, claims have not been filed for such dependents, the full rate will be authorized for the first payee.

[29 FR 9564, July 15, 1964]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.27 Pending trademark application index; access to applications.

(a) An index of pending applications including the name and address of the applicant, a reproduction or description of the mark, the goods or services with which the mark is used, the class number, the dates of use, and the serial number and filing date of the application will be available for public inspection as soon as practicable after filing.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, access to the file of a particular pending application will be permitted prior to publication under § 2.80 upon written request.

(c) Decisions of the Director and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in applications and proceedings relating thereto are published or available for inspection or publication.

(d) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the official records of applications and all proceedings relating thereto are available for public inspection and copies of the documents may be furnished upon payment of the fee required by § 2.6.

(e) Anything ordered to be filed under seal pursuant to a protective order issued or made by any court or by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in any proceeding involving an application or a registration shall be kept confidential and shall not be made available for public inspection or copying unless otherwise ordered by the court or the Board, or unless the party protected by the order voluntarily discloses the matter subject thereto. When possible, only confidential portions of filings with the Board shall be filed under seal.

[36 FR 25406, Dec. 31, 1971, as amended at 48 FR 23134, May 23, 1983; 48 FR 27225, June 14, 1983; 73 FR 67768, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 17.276 Claim filing deadline. ( a ) Unless an exception is granted under paragraph (b) of this section, claims for medical services and supplies must be filed no later than: ( 1 ) One year after the date of service; or
( 2 ) In the case of inpatient care, one year after the date of discharge; or
( 3 ) In the case of retroactive approval for medical services/supplies, 180 days following beneficiary notification of authorization; or
( 4 ) In the case of retroactive approval of CHAMPVA eligibility, 180 days following notification to the beneficiary of authorization for services occurring on or after the date of first eligibility.
( b ) Requests for an exception to the claim filing deadline must be submitted in writing and include a complete explanation of the circumstances resulting in late filing along with all available supporting documentation. Each request for an exception to the claim filing deadline will be reviewed individually and considered on its own merit. VA may grant exceptions to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section if it determines that there was good cause for missing the filing deadline. For example, when dual coverage exists, CHAMPVA payment, if any, cannot be determined until after the primary insurance carrier has adjudicated the claim. In such circumstances an exception may be granted provided that the delay on the part of the primary insurance carrier is not attributable to the beneficiary. Delays due to provider billing procedures do not constitute a valid basis for an exception.
( c ) Claims for CHAMPVA-covered services and supplies provided before the date of the event that qualifies an individual under § 17.271 are not reimbursable.
( d ) CHAMPVA is the last payer to OHI, as that term is defined in § 17.270(b). CHAMPVA benefits will generally not be paid until the claim has been filed with the OHI and the OHI has issued a final payment determination or explanation of benefits. CHAMPVA is secondary payer to Medicare per the terms of § 17.271(b).
[63 FR 48102, Sept. 9, 1998, as amended at 73 FR 65553, Nov. 4, 2008. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 41602, 41603, July 13, 2022]
#### § 20.405 Rule 405. Docketing of simultaneously contested claims at the Board.

After expiration of the 30-day period for response in § 20.404, the Board will place all parties of the simultaneously contested claim on the docket for the type of review requested under § 20.202(b). In the event the parties request different types of review, if any party requests a hearing the appeal will be placed on the docket described in § 20.800(a)(iii), and VA will notify the parties that a hearing will be scheduled. If no party requested a hearing, but any party requested the opportunity to submit additional evidence, the appeal will be placed on the docket described in § 20.800(a)(ii), and the parties will be notified of their opportunity to submit additional evidence within 90 days of the date of such notice.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105A(b)(1))

[84 FR 182, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
§ 21.7124 Overcharges. ( a ) *Overcharges by educational institutions may result in the disapproval of enrollments.* VA may disapprove an educational institution for further enrollments when the educational institution charges or receives from a veteran or servicemember tuition and fees that exceed the established charges that the educational institution requires from similarly circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same course. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3690(a))
( b ) *Overcharges by organizations or entities offering licensing or certification tests may result in disapproval of tests.* VA may disapprove an organization or entity offering a licensing or certification test when the organization or entity offering the test charges or receives from a veteran or servicemember fees that exceed the established fees that the organization or entity requires from similarly circumstanced nonveterans taking the same test.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3689(d), 3690(a))
[72 FR 16981, Apr. 5, 2007]
§ 17.629 Application for the VIOMPSP. ( a ) *Application-general.* Each individual desiring a VIOMPSP scholarship must submit an accurate and complete application, including a signed written acceptance agreement.
( b ) *VA's duties.* VA will notify applicants prior to acceptance in the VIOMPSP of the following information: ( 1 ) A fair summary of the rights and liabilities of an individual whose application is approved by VA and whose acceptance agreement is consummated by VA; and
( 2 ) Full description of the terms and conditions that apply to participation in the VIOMPSP and service in VA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 7502(a)(2))
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0793)
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 14, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-150

Lower Tribunal Nos. 20-148 AP, 19-8673 CC

________________

Nahid M F International, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Madison Acquisitions Corp.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. 

Barket, Judge.

Shlomo Y. Hecht, P.A., and Shlomo Y Hecht (Miramar), for appellant.

Legon Fodiman, P.A., Todd A. Fodiman and Wendy V. Polit, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Ebsary Found. Co. v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 569 

So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Correction:*                     This notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 27, 2009, Volume 74, Number 16, page 4752. The aforementioned meeting has been rescheduled to the following:                

*Time and Date:*                     3:30 p.m.-5 p.m., February 12, 2009 (Closed).                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Brenda Colley Gilbert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, 2877 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30341,                     *telephone:*                     (770) 488-8390.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: January 27, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-2302 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# NATURAL GAS GLOSSARY › FAQS › OVERVIEW DATA ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS Home > Natural Gas> Schematic Geology of Natural Gas Resources 

## Schematic Geology of Natural Gas Resources Released: January 27, 2010

With the growth of natural gas from shale, there is re newed interest in natural gas resources. The diagram sh ows the geologic nature of most major sources of natural gas in the U.S. in schematic form:  Gas-rich shale is the source rock for many natural gas resources, but, unti l now, has not been a focus for production. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have made shale gas an economically viable alternative to convention al gas resources.  Conventional gas accumulations occur when gas migrates from gas rich shale into an overl ying sandstone formation, and then becomes trapped by an overlying imp ermeable formation, called the seal . Associated gas accumulates in conjunction with oil, while non-associated gasdoes not accumulate with oil.  Tight sand gas accumulations occur in a variety of geologic settings where gas migrates from a source rock into a sandstone formation, but is limited in its ability to mi grate upward due to reduced permeability in the sandstone.  Coalbed methane does not migrate from shale, but is generated during the transformation of organic material to coal. 

# Page 1 of 1 Schematic Geology of Natural Gas Resources

1/ 13/2014 http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/special/ngresources/ngresour ces.html
§ 17.240 Sharing health-care resources. Subject to such terms and conditions as the Under Secretary for Health shall prescribe, agreements may be entered into for sharing medical resources between Department health-care facilities and any health-care provider, or other entity or individual with geographical limitations determined by the Under Secretary for Health, provided: ( a ) The agreement will achieve one of the following purposes: ( 1 ) It will secure the use of a health-care resource which otherwise might not be feasibly available by providing for the mutual use or exchange of use of health-care resources when such an agreement will obviate the need for a similar resource to be installed or provided at a facility operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, or
( 2 ) It will secure effective use of Department of Veterans Affairs health-care resources by providing for the mutual use, or exchange of use, of health-care resources in a facility operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, which have been justified on the basis of veterans' care, but which are not utilized to their maximum effective capacity; and
( b ) The agreement is determined to be in the best interest of the prevailing standards of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Program; and
( c ) The agreement provides for reciprocal reimbursement based on a charge which covers the full cost of the use of health-care resources, incidental hospital care or other needed services, supplies used, and normal depreciation and amortization costs of equipment.
( d ) Reimbursement for medical care rendered to an individual who is entitled to hospital or medical services (Medicare) under subchapter XVIII of chapter 7 of title 42 U.S.C., and who has no entitlement to medical care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, will be made to such facility, or if the contract or agreement so provides, to the community health care facility which is party to the agreement, in accordance with: ( 1 ) Rates prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, after consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and
( 2 ) Procedures jointly prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to assure reasonable quality of care and service and efficient and economical utilization of resources.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8153)
[32 FR 6841, May 4, 1967, as amended at 35 FR 18198, Nov. 28, 1970; 39 FR 1846, Jan. 15, 1974; 45 FR 6940, Jan. 31, 1980; 47 FR 58250, Dec. 30, 1982; 54 FR 34983, Aug. 23, 1989. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 17072, Apr. 9, 1997; 79 FR 54616, Sept. 12, 2014]