alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.458 Veteran's benefits not apportionable. Veteran's benefits will not be apportioned: ( a ) Where the total benefit payable to the disabled person does not permit payment of a reasonable amount to any apportionee.
( b ) Where the spouse of the disabled person has been found guilty of conjugal infidelity by a court having proper jurisdiction.
( c ) For purported or legal spouse of the veteran if it has been determined that he or she has lived with another person and held herself or himself out openly to the public to be the spouse of such other person, except where such relationship was entered into in good faith with a reasonable basis (for example trickery on the part of the veteran) for the spouse believing that the marriage to the veteran was legally terminated. No apportionment to the spouse will thereafter be made unless there has been a reconciliation and later estrangement.
( d ) Where the child of the disabled person has been legally adopted by another person.
( e ) Where a child enters the active military, air, or naval service, any additional amount will be paid to the veteran unless such child is included in an existing apportionment to an estranged spouse. No adjustment in the apportioned award will be made based on the child's entry into service.
( f ) ( 1 ) For the spouse, child, father or mother of a disabled veteran, where forfeiture was declared prior to September 2, 1959, if the dependent is determined by the Department of Veterans Affairs to have been guilty of mutiny, treason, sabotage, or rendering assistance to an enemy of the United States or its allies.
( 2 ) For any dependent of a disabled veteran, or surviving spouse where forfeiture of benefits by a person primarily entitled was declared after September 1, 1959, by reason of fraud, treasonable acts, or subversive activities. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 6103(b); 6104(c); 6105(a))
( g ) Until the estranged spouse of a veteran files claim for an apportioned share. If there are any children of the veteran not in his or her custody an apportionment will not be authorized unless and until a claim for an apportioned share is filed in their behalf.

Cross References:
Child. See § 3.57. Child adopted out of family. See § 3.58. [26 FR 7266, Aug. 11, 1961, as amended at 40 FR 21724, May 19, 1975; 44 FR 45940, Aug. 6, 1979; 80 FR 48451, Aug. 13, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.2502 Return by higher-level adjudicator or remand by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.

Upon receipt of a returned claim from a higher-level adjudicator or remand by the Board of Veterans' Appeals, the agency of original jurisdiction will expeditiously readjudicate the claim in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5109B. The agency of original jurisdiction retains jurisdiction of the claim. In readjudicating the claim, the agency of original jurisidction will correct all identified duty to assist errors, complete a new decision and issue notice to the claimant and or his or her legal representative in accordance with 3.103(f). The effective date of any evaluation and award of pension, compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation will be determined in accordance with the date of receipt of the initial claim as prescribed under § 3.2500(g).

[84 FR 172, Jan. 18, 2019]
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL

8 ASSOCIATION AS SUCCESSOR

9 BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK

10 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS 

11 TRUSTEE FOR THE C-BASS

12 MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED

13 CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-SP1,

14 Plaintiff-Appellee,

15 v. NO. 30,808 

16 MUKHTIAR S. KHALSA,

17 Defendant-Appellant,

18 and

19 GURNAM KHALSA, JP MORGAN, CHASE

20 BANK, N.A., and UNKNOWN TENANT

21 (REAL NAME UNKNOWN),

22 Defendants.

23 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

24 Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge

25 Little & Dranttel, P.C.

26 Elizabeth Dranttel

27 Albuquerque, NM

28 for Appellee
2

1 Mukhtiar S. Khalsa

2 Santa Cruz, NM

3 Pro Se Appellant

4 MEMORANDUM OPINION

5 KENNEDY, Judge.

6 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

7 No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing

8 so has expired. DISMISSED.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 

11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 

14 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

15 

16 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2308 

To repeal the amendment made by section 796 of the Agriculture, Rural 

Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, exempting from harboring sanctions compensation for alien volunteers for certain religious organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. TANCREDO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the amendment made by section 796 of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, 

exempting from harboring sanctions compensation for 

alien volunteers for certain religious organizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2308 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF IMMIGRATION HARBORING EXCEP2 TION FOR COMPENSATION OF ALIEN VOLUN3 TEERS BY CERTAIN BONA FIDE, NONPROFIT 

4 RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. 

5 Section 274(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)) is amended by striking sub7 paragraph (C), as added by section 796 of the Agriculture, 

8 Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and 

9 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 

10 109–97). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

p1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143952 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 14 3952 

 COA: 304924 

 Kent CC: 10-001549-FH 

RICHARD JUNIOR DOUGLAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 1, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 229 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 229

  To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members of Congress 
 shall be made in the year following a fiscal year in which there is a 
                        Federal budget deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members of Congress 
 shall be made in the year following a fiscal year in which there is a 
                        Federal budget deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deficit Accountability Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. EFFECT OF A BUDGET DEFICIT.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``Subject to 
        subparagraph (B),'' and inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (B) 
        and paragraph (3),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) An adjustment under paragraph (2) otherwise scheduled to take 
effect in a calendar year shall not be made if, as determined by the 
Office of Management and Budget, there was a deficit (as defined by 
section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 
1974) in the preceding fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
December 29, 2014

Mr. James Ferrandini President and Lead UAS Operator Upward Aerial

208 San Rafael Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901

Dear Mr. Ferrandini:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2014-0765). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation. The description

should include the size.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum. This information can be

located in the aircraft manual.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Your petition references a pre-flight inspection. Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

 Your petition references an aircraft operations manual; however, it was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the manual.

Please provide the additional information by January 12, 2015.2

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst
§ 102.7 Responses to requests. ( a ) *Grants of requests.* If the FOIA Officer makes a determination to grant a request in whole or in part, the FOIA Officer will notify the requester in writing. The FOIA Officer will inform the requester in the notice of any fee charged under § 102.11 and disclose records to the requester promptly upon payment of any applicable fee. Records disclosed in part shall be marked or annotated to show each applicable FOIA exemption and the amount of information deleted, unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption. The location of the information deleted shall also be indicated on the record, if feasible.
( b ) *Adverse determinations of requests.* If the FOIA Officer makes an adverse determination regarding a request, the FOIA Officer will notify the requester of that determination in writing. An adverse determination is a denial of a request in any respect, namely: A determination to withhold any requested record in whole or in part; a determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that a record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought by the requester; a determination that what has been requested is not a record subject to FOIA (except that a determination under § 102.11(j) that records are to be made available under a fee statute other than FOIA is not an adverse determination); a determination against the requester on any disputed fee matter, including a denial of a request for a fee waiver; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment. Each denial letter shall be signed by the FOIA Officer and shall include: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the denying official;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including applicable FOIA exemption(s);
( 3 ) An estimate of the volume of records or information withheld, in number of pages or some other reasonable form of estimation. This estimate need not be provided if the volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable FOIA exemption; and
( 4 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed, and a list of the requirements for filing an appeal under § 102.10(b).
## The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104 - 3741 ASSISTANT CLERK TELEPHONE 334 - 229 - 0733

May 17, 2024 CL - 2023 - 0281 S.S. v. K.S. (Appeal from Lauderdale Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 682.02). CL - 2023 - 0282 S.S. v. K.S. (Appeal from Lauderdale Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 683.02). CL - 2023 - 0283 S.S. v. K.S. (Appeal from Lauderdale Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 684.02). CL - 2023 - 0284 S.S. v. K.S. (Appeal from Lauderdale Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 685.02). CL - 2023 - 0285 S.S. v. K.S. (Appeal from Lauderdale Juvenile Court: JU - 21 - 390.01). ORDER You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on rehearing. Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur. Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
**
**Exhibit 33.6**

**Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria**

1. Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC (the “Depositor”), as depositor, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2021, and for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all asset-backed securities transactions for which theDepositor acted as depositor involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platformare set forth in Appendix A hereto. 

2. The Depositor used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB toassess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All otherservicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the Depositor based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 

4. The Depositor has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2021 and for the Reporting Period withrespect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on theDepositor’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2021 and for the Reporting Period. 

March 25, 2022 

 
Carvana Receivables Depositor, LLCBy: 
/s/ Mike McKeever
Name: Mike McKeeverTitle: President (senior officer in charge of securitization)**

Appendix A 

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4

Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4

 
2
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.64



November 11, 2003

Mr. Vijay C. Tharani
10 Quaker Lane
West Harrison, NY 10604

Dear Mr. Tharani:

This letter will serve as Amendment No. 1 to the agreement dated June 18, 2001,
(the "Agreement"), which sets forth the terms of your employment with Baldwin
Technology Company, Inc. (the "Company").

Paragraph 2D of the Agreement is changed by deleting that Paragraph in its
entirety, and inserting in its place the following:

D. Supplemental Retirement Benefit. On the first day of each month that you are
still providing services under the terms of this Agreement, the Company shall
accrue for your Supplemental Retirement Benefit, an amount necessary to ensure
that, to the extent vested, the amount accrued would be sufficient to support
monthly payments to equal 30% of your average base salary for the previous three
(3) years (see attachment I). These payments ("Supplemental Retirement
Benefits") are to be paid to you in equal monthly installments over a ten (10)
year period beginning at such times as are set forth in this Agreement. These
Supplemental Retirement Benefits will vest in each case assuming you are then
employed by the Company, as follows: as of June 18, 2002 it shall be vested to
the extent of 20%, as of June 18, 2003 it shall be vested to the extent of 40%,
as of June 18, 2004 it shall be vested to the extent of 60%, as of June 18, 2005
it shall be vested to the extent of 80%, and as of June 18, 2006 it shall be
vested to the extent of 100% so that as of the latter date the full amount of
the Aggregate Supplemental Retirement Benefit shall be due and payable in the
instances set forth elsewhere in this Agreement.

All other sections of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as
originally agreed to.

BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.

By:
    -------------------------
    Gerald A. Nathe
    Chairman, President & CEO

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

    -------------------------
    Vijay C. Tharani
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6117

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES SIMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (7:02-cr-00248-GRA-13) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 James Sims appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Sims, No. 7:02-cr00248-GRA-13 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009).* We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

 We consider Sims’ notice of appeal to have been timely 

filed. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
#### § 17.1000 Payment or reimbursement for emergency services for nonservice-connected conditions in non-VA facilities.

Sections 17.1000 through 17.1008 constitute the requirements under 38 U.S.C. 1725 that govern VA payment or reimbursement for non-VA emergency services furnished to a veteran for nonservice-connected conditions.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1725)

Note to § 17.1000:

In cases where a patient is admitted for inpatient care, health care providers furnishing emergency treatment who believe they may have a basis for filing a claim with VA for payment under 38 U.S.C. 1725 should contact VA within 48-hours after admission for emergency treatment. Such contact is not a condition of VA payment. However, the contact will assist the provider in understanding the conditions for payment. The contact may also assist the provider in planning for transfer of the veteran after stabilization.

[66 FR 36470, July 12, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 3404, Jan. 24, 2003]
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT  OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Grant of Deferred Stock Units.
 2. Vesting and Forfeiture.
 3. Settlement of Deferred Stock Units. Exhibit
A




---



##### 



4. Restriction on Transferability
 5. Securities Laws
 6. Withholding of Applicable Taxes.
 7. Subject to Terms of Plan.
 8. No Rights as Stockholder.
 9. Binding Effect
 -2-




---



##### 



10. Governing Law.
 11. Counterparts
  -3-




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Name:Title:DIRECTOR




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 ELECTION FOR RECEIPT OF RESTRICTED STOCK, RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS,
OR DEFERRED STOCK UNITS
 no later than
 Please note that only recipients of restricted stock may make a Section
8 3(b) election.
 Election to Receive Restricted Stock, RSUs or DSUs
  Restricted StockRestricted Stock Units (RSUs)Deferred Stock Units (DSUs)
 Note that if you select both
options below, your OSI shares will be delivered to you on the first to occur of six (6)
months after the termination of your service on the Board of Directors or the alternate date that
you select.
 Six (6) months after my service on the Board of Directors terminates; and/orOn the following alternate date:  [must be no earlier than]




---



##### 



Section 83(b) Election  for recipients of Restricted Stock only
 I intend to make an 83(b) election and request that you prepare an election form on my behalf.I intend to make an 83(b) election but will use my personal accountant to prepare the election form. I will furnish OSI with a copy of the form within 30 days of filing.I do not intend to make an 83(b) election.
 Directors Name (Print)Signature
    
    Date
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.50 Spouse and surviving spouse. ( a ) *Spouse.* “Spouse” means a person of the opposite sex whose marriage to the veteran meets the requirements of § 3.1(j).
( b ) *Surviving spouse.* Except as provided in § 3.52, “surviving spouse” means a person of the opposite sex whose marriage to the veteran meets the requirements of § 3.1(j) and who was the spouse of the veteran at the time of the veteran's death and: ( 1 ) Who lived with the veteran continuously from the date of marriage to the date of the veteran's death except where there was a separation which was due to the misconduct of, or procured by, the veteran without the fault of the spouse; and
( 2 ) Except as provided in § 3.55, has not remarried or has not since the death of the veteran and after September 19, 1962, lived with another person of the opposite sex and held himself or herself out openly to the public to be the spouse of such other person.
[62 FR 5529, Feb. 6, 1997]