alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF DELAWARE

OFFICE OF THE

SECRETA.RY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL­ RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
89 KINGS HIGHWAY DOVER, DELAWARE 1990 I PHONE: FA.x: (302, 739·9000 (302) 739-6242 May 25, 2011

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

# Dear~ I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State ofDelaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The revision is to 7 DE Admin. Code 1124­ CONTROL OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS

- Section 47.0 "Offset Lithographic Printing. The revision update relevant regulations to implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) controls on emission sources covered in EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) or Alternate Control Techniques (ACT). EPA has updated several CTGs and the afore-mentioned revision to 7 DE Admin Code 1124 reflect DE's efforts accordingly. This revision is effective April 11,2011.

The requirements ofthe CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearing process established by the State ofDelaware with proper notification (30 days) priorto the convening ofthe public hearing. Attachments A and B are copies ofaffidavits as proofofpropernotification. It is the position ofthe State ofDelaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean AirAct Amendments have been met.

We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this important work. As always, feel free to contact me orAli Mirzakhalili, Director, Division ofAir Quality, (302) 739-9402, ifyou have any questions concerning the enclosed documents.

Enclosures

cc: Diana Esher, EPA w/encl. Ali Mirzakhalili

## Vef4et!afZe'~ 

# tJood 1tatevze 0#

## ~!
§ 71.20 Public health prevention measures to detect communicable disease. ( a ) The Director may conduct public health prevention measures, at U.S. ports of entry or other locations, through non-invasive procedures as defined in section 71.1 to detect the potential presence of communicable diseases.
( b ) As part of the public health prevention measures, the Director may require individuals to provide contact information such as U.S. and foreign addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and other contact information, as well as information concerning their intended destination, health status, known or possible exposure history, and travel history.
[82 FR 6975, Jan. 19, 2017]
Exhibit 31.2
 
 *CERTIFICATION*
  I, Colin Dunn, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bel Fuse Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   ****Date: November 5, 2004
By:
/s/ Colin DunnColin Dunn, Vice President of Finance
```

[107th Congress Public Law 167]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ167.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 130]]

Public Law 107-167
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
375 Carlls Path in Deer Park, New York, as the ``Raymond M. Downey Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Apr. 18, 2002 -  [H.R. 3379]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 375 
Carlls Path in Deer Park, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``Raymond M. Downey Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Raymond M. Downey Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved April 18, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3379:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 147 (2001):
                                    Dec. 18, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 148 (2002):
                                    Mar. 22, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50771 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALLEN BRENTWOOD MARDIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-90-CR-58

- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Allen Brentwood Mardis, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se , appeals from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence filed under an unidentified provision or statute. Mardis, who pleaded guilty in 1990 to theft of postal moneys, argues only that he is entitled to a three-level offense level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. The relief Mardis seeks is not available under any of several statutory vehicles for post-conviction relief. SeeNo. 95-50771 - 2 - United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140 (5th Cir.), cert
. denied , 115 S. Ct. 600 (1994); United States v. Vaughn , 955 F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992). Mardis’ substantive claim is in any event frivolous. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of his motion is
AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.651 Change in status of dependents. Except as otherwise provided: ( a ) A payee who becomes entitled to pension, compensation, or dependency and indemnity compensation or to a greater rate because payment of that benefit to another payee has been reduced or discontinued will be awarded the benefit or increased benefit without the filing of a new claim.
( b ) The commencement or adjustment will be effective the day following the reduction or discontinuance of the award to the other payee if the necessary evidence is received in the Department of Veterans Affairs within 1 year from the date of request therefor; otherwise from the date of receipt of a new claim.
( c ) The rate for the persons entitled will be the rate that would have been payable if they had been the only original persons entitled.
[26 FR 1598, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended 27 FR 11890, Dec. 1, 1962; 30 FR 133, Jan. 7, 1965]
§ 21.3024 Nonduplication; Federal Employees' Compensation Act. ( a ) *Civilian employment.* The provisions of this paragraph are applicable to cases where there is eligibility for benefits from the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) based on the disability or death as a result of civilian employment of the veteran from whom eligibility for educational assistance is derived. ( 1 ) *Child, spouse or surviving spouse.* A person who is eligible for educational assistance and is also eligible for Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits, under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) must elect which benefit he or she will receive.
( 2 ) *Veteran, spouse and child—surviving spouse and child.* An eligible person may receive educational assistance notwithstanding that the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) are being paid to a veteran, or surviving spouse.
( 3 ) *Election.* An election of Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits, under the Federal employees' Compensation Act (FECA), by or for a child filed on or after July 4, 1966, is a bar to subsequent payments of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits during the period of concurrent eligibility. An election of Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) by a surviving spouse filed on or after December 1, 1968, is a bar to subsequent payments of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits during the period of concurrent eligibility.
( b ) *Military service.* The provisions of this paragraph are applicable to cases where there is eligibility for benefits from Office of Workers' Compensation Program, under the Federal Employee's Compensation Act (FECA) based on the disability or death as a result of military service by the veteran from whom eligibility for educational assistance is derived. ( 1 ) *Child, spouse or surviving spouse.* A person who is eligible for educational assistance and is also eligible for Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits, under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) must elect which benefit he or she will receive. The election may be made at any time.
( 2 ) *Veteran, spouse and child—surviving spouse and child.* An eligible person may receive educational assistance notwithstanding that the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits, under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) are being paid to a veteran, or surviving spouse.

Cross Reference:
*Federal Employees' Compensation.* See § 3.708 of this chapter.
[40 FR 42879, Sept. 17, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 27826, July 8, 1985]
# Official Journal C 107/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 107 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 654 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 107

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 654 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 107/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine | 1 |
| 2022/C 107/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine apply | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 107/01

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

1

2022/C 107/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Robert SAULSBURY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lamoyne GREEN, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15271.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 18, 1963.

Robert Saulsbury, in pro. per.

John Cianflona, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, on brief, for appellee.

Before WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and BROOKS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Saulsbury appeals to this Court from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Saulsbury is a prisoner in one of the state prisons in Ohio, there confined under judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio. His petition alleged that his conviction of violation of the narcotics laws was tainted with violation of his federally granted Constitutional rights.

The petition does not allege that he took any appeal from his conviction and the only remedy attempted by him in the state courts of Ohio was an application for writ of habeas corpus to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Tenth District, which denied his petition. Upon the filing of his present petition for writ of habeas corpus, the respondent, Superintendent of the Marion Correctional Institution, moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that Saulsbury did not, as required by Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, exhaust remedies available to him in the State of Ohio. The motion was granted.

 Under Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837, Sauls*321bury’s failure to have employed state remedies not now available to him would not bar his present entry into the United States Courts. However, there still remains available to Saulsbury state court remedies in Ohio in which he can raise the constitutional question now asserted by him. Under Article 4, Section 2 of the Ohio Constitution, the Supreme Court of that state has original jurisdiction in habeas corpus. This remedy is recited as a procedural right under Section 2725.02 of the Ohio Revised Code. Likewise, under Section 2953.05 of the Ohio Revised Code, Saulsbury could, by obtaining leave of court, seek a delayed appeal. These remedies being still available to Saulsbury, we are of the opinion that his petition to the District Court in this case was properly dismissed.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.359 Determination of service connection for former members of the Armed Forces of Czechoslovakia or Poland.

Rating boards will determine whether or not the condition for which treatment is claimed by former members of the Armed Forces of Czechoslovakia or Poland under 38 U.S.C. 109(c) is service connected. This determination will be made using the same criteria that applies to determinations of service connection based on service in the Armed Forces of the United States.

[43 FR 4424, Feb. 2, 1978]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2434 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide regular notice to individuals submitting claims for 

benefits administered by the Secretary on the status of such claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mrs. DRAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide regular notice to 

individuals submitting claims for benefits administered 

by the Secretary on the status of such claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Right to 

5 Know Act of 2007’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2434 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS TO PROVIDE REGULAR NOTICE TO 

3 CLAIMANTS OF BENEFITS ADMINISTERED BY 

4 THE SECRETARY OF STATUS OF CLAIM. 

5 (a) NOTICE REQUIREMENT.—Chapter 51 of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 

7 5102 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 5102A. Notice to claimants of status of claims 

9 ‘‘(a) NOTICE REQUIRED.—For any claim for a ben10 efit under a law administered by the Secretary with re11 spect to which the Secretary has made no decision, the 

12 Secretary shall provide to the claimant (and to the claim13 ant’s representative) notice of the status of the claim, 

14 using the method selected by the claimant pursuant to 

15 subsection (b), by not later than the date that is 60 days 

16 after the date on which the claim was submitted and every 

17 60 days thereafter until the Secretary makes a decision 

18 with respect to the claim, unless the claimant chooses not 

19 to receive such notice pursuant to such subsection. 

20 ‘‘(b) METHOD OF NOTICE.—When a person submits 

21 a claim for a benefit under a law administered by the Sec22 retary, the Secretary shall furnish such person, free of all 

23 expense, notice of the Secretary’s requirement to provide 

24 notice under subsection (a) and an appropriate form on 

25 which the person may choose a preferred method of receiv26 ing such notice or not to receive such notice.’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 2434 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

3 after the item relating to section 5102 the following new 

4 item: 

‘‘5102A. Notice to claimants of status of claims.’’. 

5 (c) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The Sec6 retary of Veterans Affairs shall implement the notice re7 quirement under section 5102A of title 38, United States 

8 Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 60 

9 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 21.254 Supportive services. ( a ) *General.* Supportive services which may be provided during a period or program of employment services include a broad range of medical treatment, care and services, supplies, license and other fees, special services, including services to the blind and deaf, transportation assistance, services to the veteran's family, and other appropriate services, subject to the limitations provided in VA regulations governing the provisions of these services under Chapter 31.
( b ) *Exclusions.* The following benefits may not be provided to the veteran by VA during a period or program of employment services: ( 1 ) Subsistence allowance, or payment of an allowance at the educational assistance rate paid under Chapter 30 for similar training;
( 2 ) Education and training services, other than brief courses, such as review courses necessary for licensure;
( 3 ) Revolving Fund Loan; and
( 4 ) Work-study allowance. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104(a), 3108(f))
( c ) *Individuals with service-connected disability(ies) trained for self-employment under a State rehabilitation agency.* An individual with service-connected disability(ies) who has trained for self-employment under a State rehabilitation agency may be provided supplemental equipment and initial stocks and supplies similar to the materials supplied under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 to individuals with the most severe service-connected disability(ies) who require self-employment as defined in § 21.257(b) if VA determines that the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The individual is eligible for employment assistance under the provisions of § 21.47;
( 2 ) Evidence of record indicates that the individual has successfully completed training for a self-employment program under a State rehabilitation agency;
( 3 ) No other non-VA sources of assistance are known to be available for the individual to complete his or her self-employment program; and
( 4 ) The individual meets the requirements of the definition in § 21.257(b).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104, 3117(b)(2))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 4283, Jan. 30, 1989; 57 FR 57108, Dec. 3, 1992; 62 FR 17709, Apr. 11, 1997; 75 FR 3169, Jan. 20, 2010]