alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J une 2 5 , 2013

VIA E

- MAIL TO PATRICK AU

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Emissions Assessment Branch

Stationary Source Division

Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Subject: SIP Submitt al for Recently Amended Rule 810, Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration

(PSD )

Dear Mr. Guzzetta:

On June 20, 2013 , the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors held a public hearing

on adopting amended Rule 810, Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD ) . After the public hearing, the

Board adopted the amended rule. Transmit ted with this letter is the adopted amended r ule for inclusion in California

State Implementation Plan (SIP)

.

On January 20, 2011 , the District adopted Rule 810 as part of a suite of rules to implement the United States

Environmental Protection Agency’s ( EPA’s) PSD and Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule. Although the District

adhered to the EPA’s model rule, EPA determined that slight changes to Rule 810 were necessary before EPA could

incorporate the rule into the State Implementation Plan. The rule amendments made on June 20, 2013 included the

changes suggested by EPA

.

Reference Checklist Item 3, Complete Copy of the Referenced Rules : The SIP Completeness Checklist requests

copies of all referenced rules, unless previously submitted as part of an earlier SIP submittal. Rule 810 reference s

Rules 102, 201, 204

, 205, 206, 207, 208, and 210 . Our records indicate that the District has pr eviously submitted all

of these rules as part of earlier SIP submittals. It should also be noted that:

a

. EPA had approved Rule 210 into the SIP but deleted it without replacement per 62 FR 34641 on June 27,

1997 (40 CFR 52.220(c)(51)(xiii)(B ) codifies this action) ;

b

. EPA had approved Rules 204, 207, and 208 into the SIP but deleted them without replacement per 69 FR

6706 2 on November 16, 2004 (40 CFR 5 2.220(c)(51)(xiii)(D) codifies this acti on); and

c. The District submitted current Rules 102, 201

, 20 5, and 206 to ARB for inclusion into the SIP as shown in

the following table:

Rule Date of Adoption Date Submitted to ARB

102 June 21, 2012 July 11, 2012

201 June 19, 2008 July 7, 2008

205 April 17, 1997 May 9, 1997

206 October 15, 199 1 November 8, 1991

Reference Checklist Item 5

, Resolution or Minute Order : B oth of these are proved as Attachment 6.
§ 201.14 Warnings of copyright for use by certain libraries and archives. ( a ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) A *Display Warning of Copyright* is a notice under paragraphs (d)(2) and (e)(2) of section 108 of title 17 of the United States Code. As required by those sections the “Display Warning of Copyright” is to be displayed at the place where orders for copies or phonorecords are accepted by certain libraries and archives.
( 2 ) An *Order Warning of Copyright* is a notice under paragraphs (d)(2) and (e)(2) of section 108 of title 17 of the United States Code. As required by those sections the “Order Warning of Copyright” is to be included on printed forms supplied by certain libraries and archives and used by their patrons for ordering copies or phonorecords.
( b ) *Contents.* A Display Warning of Copyright and an Order Warning of Copyright shall consist of a verbatim reproduction of the following notice, printed in such size and form and displayed in such manner as to comply with paragraph (c) of this section: notice warning concerning copyright restrictions The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
( c ) *Form and manner of use.* ( 1 ) A Display Warning of Copyright shall be printed on heavy paper or other durable material in type at least 18 points in size, and shall be displayed prominently, in such manner and location as to be clearly visible, legible, and comprehensible to a casual observer within the immediate vicinity of the place where orders are accepted.
( 2 ) An Order Warning of Copyright shall be printed within a box located prominently on the order form itself, either on the front side of the form or immediately adjacent to the space calling for the name or signature of the person using the form. The notice shall be printed in type size no smaller than that used predominantly throughout the form, and in no case shall the type size be smaller than eight points. The notice shall be printed in such manner as to be clearly legible, comprehensible, and readily apparent to a casual reader of the form.
(Pub. L. 94-553; 17 U.S.C. 108, 702)
[42 FR 59265, Nov. 16, 1977, as amended at 82 FR 9357, Feb. 6, 2017]
#### § 4.18 Unemployability.

A veteran may be considered as unemployable upon termination of employment which was provided on account of disability, or in which special consideration was given on account of the same, when it is satisfactorily shown that he or she is unable to secure further employment. With amputations, sequelae of fractures and other residuals of traumatism shown to be of static character, a showing of continuous unemployability from date of incurrence, or the date the condition reached the stabilized level, is a general requirement in order to establish the fact that present unemployability is the result of the disability. However, consideration is to be given to the circumstances of employment in individual claims, and, if the employment was only occasional, intermittent, tryout or unsuccessful, or eventually terminated on account of the disability, present unemployability may be attributed to the static disability. Where unemployability for pension previously has been established on the basis of combined service-connected and nonservice-connected disabilities and the service-connected disability or disabilities have increased in severity, § 4.16 is for consideration.

[40 FR 42536, Sept. 15, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 45349, Oct. 2, 1978]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... programs andaccomplishments [electronic resource]**
 
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006
 
SuDoc Number:C 13.1/7:
Item Number:0238-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000551549
 
January 28, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2356 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2356

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 4, United States Code, to encourage the display of the 
               flag of the United States on Father's Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL OCCASION FOR DISPLAY OF THE FLAG OF THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``Flag Day, June 14;'' the following: ``Father's Day, 
third Sunday in June;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 1.904 Form of payment.

Claims may be paid in the form of money or, when a contractual basis exists, VA may demand the return of specific property or the performance of specific services.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)

[69 FR 62192, Oct. 25, 2004]
#### § 404.4 Authority to grant licenses.

Federally owned inventions shall be made available for licensing as deemed appropriate in the public interest and each agency shall notify the public of these available inventions. The agencies having custody of these inventions may grant nonexclusive, co-exclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive licenses thereto under this part. Licenses may be royalty-free or for royalties or other consideration. They may be for all or less than all fields of use or in specified geographic areas and may include a release for past infringement. Any license shall not confer on any person immunity from the antitrust laws or from a charge of patent misuse, and the exercise of such rights pursuant to this part shall not be immunized from the operation of state or federal law by reason of the source of the grant.

[71 FR 11512, Mar. 8, 2006]
|Exhibit 32
|----------



|COGENCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|---------------------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco International, Inc. for the periods presented.



|February 17, 2009
|-----------------



|/s/ David Brenman_______________David W. Brenman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2021-1 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A..

Date:  June 16, 2023



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2408 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

\Alpha3\E\HSEENR\h2408--enr.xml [file 1 of 1]

        H.R.2408

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the ``Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.
    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Green Bay, 
Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans 
Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. Any reference to such medical center in 
any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 
United States shall be considered to be a reference to the Milo C. 
Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 18a.2 Delegation to the Under Secretary for Benefits.

The Under Secretary for Benefits is delegated responsibility for obtaining evidence of voluntary compliance for vocational rehabilitation, education, and special restorative training to implement Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964. Authority is delegated to the Under Secretary for Benefits and designee to take any necessary action as to programs of vocational rehabilitation, education, or special restorative training under 38 U.S.C. Chapters 31, 34, 35, and 36 for the purpose of securing evidence of voluntary compliance directly or through the agencies to whom the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has delegated responsibility for various schools or training establishments to implement part 18 of this chapter. The Under Secretary for Benefits also is delegated responsibility for obtaining evidence of voluntary compliance from recognized national organizations whose representatives are afforded space and office facilities in field facilities under jurisdiction of the Under Secretary for Benefits.

[35 FR 10759, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986; 54 FR 34984, Aug. 23, 1989]
#### § 17.150 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4027

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO DENARD TORRENCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:15-cr-00199-WO-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 21, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, John A. Duberstein, Assistant Federal Public 

Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Denard Torrence appeals his conviction for brandishing a firearm during 

and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2012). He 

contends that his § 924(c) conviction is invalid because the residual clause in 

§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague and Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of 

violence under the force clause in § 924(c)(3)(A). Although the Supreme Court has 

invalidated the residual clause, United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2336 (2019), this 

Court has held that Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under the force clause, United 

States v. Mathis, 932 F.3d 242, 266 (4th Cir. 2019). Torrence’s § 924(c) conviction is 

therefore valid, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7752

STEPHEN D. HERTO,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN T. MURPHY, Acting Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:17-cv-00054-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Herto, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Herto seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for 

an evidentiary hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition and giving him an 

opportunity to abandon the claims the district court found unexhausted or to stay the action 

pending exhaustion in state court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Herto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and deny Herto’s motion to stay district court 

proceedings pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 20.905 Rule 905. Content of Board decision, remand, or order in simultaneously contested claims.

The content of the Board's decision, remand, or order in appeals involving a simultaneously contested claim will be limited to information that directly affects the issues involved in the contested claim. Appellate issues that do not involve all of the contesting parties will be addressed in one or more separate written decisions, remands, or orders that will be furnished only to the appellants concerned and their representatives, if any.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), 38 U.S.C. 5701(a))

[61 FR 68666, Dec. 30, 1996. Redesignated at 84 FR 177, Jan. 18, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

LUIS EDUARDO LARA §

 §

 Appellant §

 §

vs. § CASE NO. 14-15-00581-CR

 § 

 § TRIAL COURT NO. 14CR2148

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

 §

Appellee §

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF 

APPEALS:

 COMES NOW LUIS EDUARDO LARA, Appellant in the above-styled and 

numbered cause, by his Counsel of Record, Greg Russell, and pursuant to 

TEX.R.APP.P. 34.6(d), files this Motion For Extension of Time to File Appellant’s 

and in support thereof would show this Honorable Court the following:

I.

 Appellant was found guilty by a jury Sexual Assault of Child, Indecency 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00581-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/9/2015 1:49:55 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/9/2015 1:49:55 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
with a Child by Contact and Continuos Sexual Abuse Child and punishment was 

assessed at 15 years, 8 Years and 28 years, respectively, Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice.

II.

 Appellant’s Brief was due on or before October 5, 2015.

 III. 

 Appellant’s counsel, apparently, incorrectly imputed the due date of 

Appellant’s Brief for November 5, 2015, instead of the correct due date of October 

5, 2015. This was an oversight/mistake on the part of appellant’s counsel.

IV.

 Additionally, appellant’s counsel has been preparing for a trial that will 

begin on October 13, 2015 in Fort Bend County, that involves an automatic life 

sentence upon a conviction. The case is styled The State of Texas vs. Jeremy 

Lange, 14DCR65359, 14DCR65360, 14DCR65361 and 14DCR66459, in the 

400th District Court. Appellant’s counsel has been preparing for this trial for most 

of August and September 2015.
V.

 Due to appellant’s counsel being in trial beginning October 13, 2015 in Fort 

Bend that will in all liklihood last two weeks, appellant respectfully requests a 45 

day extension to file Appellant’s Brief.

 Appellant prays that this extension be granted and that Appellant’s Brief be 

ordered due to this Court within 45 days.

 Respectfully submitted,

 

 /s/ Greg Russell 

 Greg Russell

 Attorney for Appellant

 711 59th Street

 Galveston, Texas 77551

 (409) 497-4743

 (409) 497-4721 Fax

 SBN: 174115
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 Pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 9.5(d), this motion was served on Mr. Jack Roady, 

Galveston County District Attorney, 600 59th Street, 1st Floor, Galveston, Texas, 

77551, by efile/email service, on October 9, 2015.

 /s/ Greg Russell 

 Greg Russell

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 I do hereby that this motion is in compliance with Rule 9.4(i) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is computer generated and its relevant 

portions contain 427 words.

 /s/ Greg Russell 

 Greg Russell