alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.5071 Months of entitlement allowed. ( a ) *Entitlement based on monthly contributions.* The Department of Veterans Affairs will credit an individual with 1 month of entitlement for each month he or she contributes to the fund up to a maximum of 36 months or its equivalent in part-time training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3231)
( b ) *Entitlement based on lump-sum contributions.* If an individual elects to make a lump-sum contribution, the Department of Veterans Affairs will credit an individual with 1 month of entitlement for: ( 1 ) Every $100 included in the lump sum, or
( 2 ) Every amount included in the lump sum which: ( i ) Is at least $25 but no more than $100,
( ii ) Is evenly divisible by five, and
( iii ) Is specifically designated by the individual at the time he or she makes the contribution. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3222(d))
( c ) *Entitlement based on both monthly and lump-sum contributions.* ( 1 ) If the individual makes both monthly and lump-sum contributions, the Department of Veterans Affairs will: ( i ) Compute the entitlement due to each type of contribution separately under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and
( ii ) Will combine the results of the computations to determine the individual's total entitlement.
( 2 ) In no event will an individual's entitlement exceed 36 months or its equivalent in part-time training.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3222(d), 3231)
[47 FR 51745, Nov. 17, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 50530, Nov. 2, 1983]
§ 4.26 Bilateral factor. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, when a partial disability results from disease or injury of both arms, or of both legs, or of paired skeletal muscles, the ratings for the disabilities of the right and left sides will be combined as usual, and 10 percent of this value will be added (*i.e.,* not combined) before proceeding with further combinations, or converting to degree of disability. The bilateral factor will be applied to such bilateral disabilities before other combinations are carried out and the rating for such disabilities including the bilateral factor in this section will be treated as one disability for the purpose of arranging in order of severity and for all further combinations. For example, with disabilities evaluated at 60 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent and 10 percent (with the two 10 percent evaluations being bilateral disabilities), the order of severity would be 60, 21 and 20. The 60 and 21 combine to 68 percent and the 68 and 20 combine to 74 percent, converted to 70 percent as the final degree of disability. ( a ) *Definitions.* The use of the terms “arms” and “legs” is not intended to distinguish between the arm, forearm and hand, or the thigh, leg, and foot, but relates to the upper extremities and lower extremities as a whole. Thus with a compensable disability of the right thigh, for example, amputation, and one of the left foot, for example, pes planus, the bilateral factor applies, and similarly whenever there are compensable disabilities affecting use of paired extremities regardless of location or specified type of impairment.
( b ) *Procedure for four affected extremities.* The correct procedure when applying the bilateral factor to disabilities affecting both upper extremities and both lower extremities is to combine the ratings of the disabilities affecting the 4 extremities in the order of their individual severity and apply the bilateral factor by adding, not combining, 10 percent of the combined value thus attained.
( c ) *Applicability.* The bilateral factor is not applicable unless there is partial disability of compensable degree in each of 2 paired extremities, or paired skeletal muscles.
( d ) *Exception.* In cases where the combined evaluation is lower than what could be achieved by not including one or more bilateral disabilities in the bilateral factor calculation, those bilateral disabilities will be removed from the bilateral factor calculation and combined separately, to achieve the combined evaluation most favorable to the veteran.
[29 FR 6718, May 22, 1964, as amended at 88 FR 22917, Apr. 14, 2023]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 239 

To increase the Federal minimum wage and to provide an alternative minimum wage as an incentive to an employer to provide health care and 

child care benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To increase the Federal minimum wage and to provide an 

alternative minimum wage as an incentive to an employer 

to provide health care and child care benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Working Americans 

5 Growing the Economy (WAGE) Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6 of the Fair Labor 

8 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 239 IH

1 (A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as 

2 follows: 

3 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec4 tion, not less than— 

5 ‘‘(A) $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th 

6 day after the date of enactment of the Working 

7 Americans Growing the Economy (WAGE) Act 

8 of 2007; 

9 ‘‘(B) $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months 

10 after that 60th day; and 

11 ‘‘(C) $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months 

12 after that 60th day;’’; and 

13 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) 

14 through (5) as paragraphs (3) through (6), re15 spectively and inserting after paragraph (2) the 

16 following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(2) if an employer provides to an employee 

18 health care benefits or child care benefits totaling 

19 not less than $2,500 per year, the applicable min20 imum wage rate paid by such employer to such em21 ployee shall be as follows: 

22 ‘‘(A) $5.15 an hour, beginning on the 60th 

23 day after the date of enactment of the Working 

24 Americans Growing the Economy (WAGE) Act 

25 of 2007; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 239 IH

1 ‘‘(B) $5.55 an hour, beginning 12 months 

2 after that 60th day; and 

3 ‘‘(C) $6.25 an hour, beginning 24 months 

4 after that 60th day;’’; and 

5 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(c) For purposes of determining the minimum wage 

8 under paragraph (2) of subsection (a), the Secretary, not 

9 later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the 

10 Working Americans Growing the Economy (WAGE) Act 

11 of 2007, shall define the categories of health care benefits 

12 and child care benefits provided by an employer to an em13 ployee which shall qualify an employer to pay the wage 

14 rates specified in such paragraph, and shall establish a 

15 method for determining the value of such benefits pro16 vided. In defining the categories of health care benefits, 

17 the Secretary shall include contributions made by an em18 ployer to a health insurance plan.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of 

21 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 4.3 Resolution of reasonable doubt.

It is the defined and consistently applied policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs to administer the law under a broad interpretation, consistent, however, with the facts shown in every case. When after careful consideration of all procurable and assembled data, a reasonable doubt arises regarding the degree of disability such doubt will be resolved in favor of the claimant. See § 3.102 of this chapter.

[40 FR 42535, Sept. 15, 1975]
AppeAl AM X V»A\/e mdV HekrcI 4W> cR iA Vcu ei/ev\/ ifeeiev/edl

*V. flfly ofiaivJAl APP^aA oo&s stlk*V h \he u^n^Mg KppeA\ t)»sVfc»c\

ot S&m KkiVjUd 1 fcbo u^ks mif&cptfeskt^fed by appca\ kUog^ev

nvidewce: Ao suppor-V VVih cAse; . X u^AA UWoe. Ag Ukic^

il my Appeal oarvs -^ecWeA b^/ ^bu £fc cJiUlt€Ji@jJ A

faAa^c (cppeaI . X*i case: 4* ^cK-c^3 \ss^uU 0»J Allblic

A

liN COURT OF Ari

1?th Court ofAppeal?. DHM.nct

CATHY 3. LUC-
#### § 494.160 [Reserved]
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 15-1779 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

BRIAN ERICK MONTES-FOSSE, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on May 31, 2016, is amended 

as follows: 

 On page 3, line 4, change "the day" to "that day"
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00192

- CR

Davon D. Crenshaw

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1317429D )

Apr il 2, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.57 Privilege for patent practitioners.

(a) *Privileged communications.* A communication between a client and a USPTO patent practitioner or a foreign jurisdiction patent practitioner that is reasonably necessary and incident to the scope of the practitioner's authority shall receive the same protections of privilege under Federal law as if that communication were between a client and an attorney authorized to practice in the United States, including all limitations and exceptions.

(b) *Definitions.* The term “USPTO patent practitioner” means a person who has fulfilled the requirements to practice patent matters before the United States Patent and Trademark Office under § 11.7 of this chapter. “Foreign jurisdiction patent practitioner” means a person who is authorized to provide legal advice on patent matters in a foreign jurisdiction, provided that the jurisdiction establishes professional qualifications and the practitioner satisfies them. For foreign jurisdiction practitioners, this rule applies regardless of whether that jurisdiction provides privilege or an equivalent under its laws.

(c) *Scope of coverage.* USPTO patent practitioners and foreign jurisdiction patent practitioners shall receive the same treatment as attorneys on all issues affecting privilege or waiver, such as communications with employees or assistants of the practitioner and communications between multiple practitioners.

[82 FR 51575, Nov. 7, 2017]
Exhibit 35.1



CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE



The undersigned hereby certifies
that the undersigned is the duly elected and acting Vice President, Controller, and Assistant Corporate Secretary of WISCONSIN ELECTRIC
POWER COMPANY, as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Environmental Control Property Servicing Agreement dated
as of May 12, 2021 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer and WEPCO ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST FINANCE
I, LLC, and further certifies that:



1.        A
review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2022 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement.



2.        To
the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.



|      |                | WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, as Servicer                
|----- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                |                                                              
|      |                | /s/ William J. Guc                                           
|Date: | March 10, 2023 | William J. Guc                                               
|      |                | Vice President, Controller, and Assistant Corporate Secretary
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0 982

_____________________________ A LVIN J. F AYSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. March 4, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS and R OWE , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Alvin J. Fayson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.

Date:  May 12, 2003                     /s/ Brian Beckwith
                                        -----------------------
                                        Brian T. Beckwith,
                                        Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32(b) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Interphase Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Steven P. Kovac, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Steven P. KovacSteven P. KovacChief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2005
PUBLIC LAW 107–168—MAY 1, 2002 116 STAT. 131

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2248:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Apr. 24, considered and passed Senate.

Apr. 30, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 107–168

107th Congress

An Act

To extend the authority of the Export-Import Bank until May 31, 2002.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXPORT-IMPORT BANK.

Notwithstanding the dates specified in section 7 of the ExportImport Bank Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635f) and section 1(c) of Public

Law 103–428, the Export-Import Bank of the United States shall

continue to exercise its functions in connection with and in furtherance of its objects and purposes through May 31, 2002.

Approved May 1, 2002.

12 USC 635f

note.

May 1, 2002

[S. 2248]
§ 21.73 Duration of employment assistance programs. ( a ) *Duration.* Employment assistance may be provided to the veteran for the period necessary to enable the veteran to secure employment in a suitable occupation, and to adjust in the employment. This period shall not exceed 18 months. A veteran may be provided such assistance if he or she is eligible for employment assistance under the provisions of § 21.47 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3105(b))
( b ) *Employment assistance not charged against Chapter 31 entitlement.* The period of employment assistance provided in paragraph (a) of this section is not charged against the months of entitlement under Chapter 31 (see § 21.70).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3105(b))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 21216, May 17, 1989]
#### § 66.112 Other HHS regulations and policies that apply.

Several other regulations and policies may apply to individuals and institutions receiving payments under this subpart. These include, but are not limited to:

[45 CFR part 46](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-46)—Protection of human subjects

[45 CFR part 76](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-76)—Governmentwide debarment and suspension (nonprocurement) and governmentwide requirements for drug-free workplace (grants)

[45 CFR part 80](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-80)—Nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal assistance through the Department of Health and Human Services effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

[45 CFR part 81](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-81)—Practice and procedure for hearings under [part 80 of this Title](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/part-80)

[45 CFR part 84](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-84)—Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance

[45 CFR part 86](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-86)—Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance

[45 CFR part 91](/on/2024-09-17/title-45/part-91)—Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance

[51 FR 16958](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-16958) (May 7, 1986)—NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules.

Note:

This policy is subject to change, and interested persons should contact the Office of Science Policy, Office of Biotechnology Activities, NIH, Suite 302, 6000 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7052, Bethesda, MD 20892-7052, (301) 496-9838 (not a toll-free number) to obtain references to the current version and any amendments.

[[49 FR 38116](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-38116), Sept. 27, 1984, as amended at [66 FR 29500](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-29500), May 31, 2001]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                            Addendum (2003-1) to the
                         Reg S Stock Purchase Agreement
                              dated April 23, 2003


This Addendum, dated June 13, 2003, sets forth an amendment of the terms of the
Reg S Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") dated April 23, 2003 between
Power Efficiency Corp (the "Company"), the address of which is 4220 Varsity
Drive, Suite E, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 USA and Starz Investments Limited, a
Belize corporation (the "Purchaser", and, together with the Company, the
"Parties"), the registered address of which is 60 Market Square, PO Box 364,
Belize City, Belize.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby extend the term of the Agreement from July
11, 2003 to August 15, 2003.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby increases the number of shares the Company
agrees to sell pursuant to the Agreement from 1,500,000 to 4,000,000 and the
Parties agree that all related provisions of the Agreement are amended
accordingly.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby reiterate that the Purchase Price, as defined
in the Agreement, shall be .40 times the Share Price, as defined in the
Agreement, for the first 1,500,000 shares and .30 times the Share Price, as
defined in the Agreement, for all subsequent shares with a floor price of $.25
per share.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree that all other terms and conditions
will remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Addendum (2003-1) to
the Regulation S Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 23, 2003.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POWER EFFICIENCY CORPORATION, a              STARZ INVESTMENTS LIMITED, a Belize
Delaware Corporation                         International business company


By:                                          By:
   --------------------------------             --------------------------------
Name:  Richard Koch                          Name:
Title: President & CEO                       Title:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 4.9 Congenital or developmental defects.

Mere congenital or developmental defects, absent, displaced or supernumerary parts, refractive error of the eye, personality disorder and mental deficiency are not diseases or injuries in the meaning of applicable legislation for disability compensation purposes.

[41 FR 11292, Mar. 18, 1976]
§ 4.86 Exceptional patterns of hearing impairment. ( a ) When the puretone threshold at each of the four specified frequencies (1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hertz) is 55 decibels or more, the rating specialist will determine the Roman numeral designation for hearing impairment from either Table VI or Table VIa, whichever results in the higher numeral. Each ear will be evaluated separately.
( b ) When the puretone threshold is 30 decibels or less at 1000 Hertz, and 70 decibels or more at 2000 Hertz, the rating specialist will determine the Roman numeral designation for hearing impairment from either Table VI or Table VIa, whichever results in the higher numeral. That numeral will then be elevated to the next higher Roman numeral. Each ear will be evaluated separately.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)
[64 FR 25209, May 11, 1999]