alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4368 Nondiscrimination and equal opportunity in housing certification requirements. ( a ) Any request for a master certificate of reasonable value on proposed or existing construction, and any request for appraisal of individual existing housing not previously occupied, which is received on or after November 21, 1962, will not be assigned for appraisal prior to receipt of a certification from the builder, sponsor or other seller, in the form prescribed by the Secretary, that neither it nor anyone authorized to act for it will decline to sell any property included in such request to a prospective purchaser because of his or her race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
( b ) On requests for appraisal of individual proposed construction received on or after November 21, 1962, the prescribed nondiscrimination certification will be required if the builder is to sell the veteran the lot on which the dwelling is to be constructed, but will not be required if: ( 1 ) The veteran owns the lot; or
( 2 ) The lot is being acquired by the veteran from a seller other than the builder and there is no identity of interest between the builder and the seller of the lot.
( c ) Each builder, sponsor or other seller requesting approval of site and subdivision planning shall be required to furnish a certification, in the form prescribed by the Secretary, that neither it nor anyone authorized to act for it will decline to sell any property included in such request to a prospective purchaser because of his or her race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Site and subdivision analysis will not be commenced by the Department of Veterans Affairs prior to receipt of such certification.
( d ) No commitment shall be issued and no loan shall be guaranteed or insured under 38 U.S.C. chapter 37 unless the veteran certifies, in such form as the Secretary shall prescribe, that ( 1 ) Neither he/she, nor anyone authorized to act for him/her, will refuse to sell or rent, after the making of a bona fide offer, or refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny the dwelling or property covered by this loan to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
( 2 ) He/she recognizes that any restrictive covenant on the property relating to race, color, religion, sex or national origin is illegal and void and any such covenant is specifically disclaimed; and
( 3 ) He/she understands that civil action for preventive relief may be brought by the Attorney General of the United States in any appropriate U.S. District Court against any person responsible for a violation of the applicable law.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Harary
    Joseph M. Harary
    President, Treasurer
    and Principal Accounting Officer
    May 10, 2004
TS-ASLT10/20/30

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2

Worker/Occupational Exposure Informatio n on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF
RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,531,992
<SECURITIES>                                 6,237,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,851,375
<PP&E>                                         165,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,076,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,069,397
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,076,259
<SALES>                                         50,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,073,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,725,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,725,102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
§ 21.5200 Schools. In the administration of benefits payable under the provisions of chapter 32, title 38, U.S.C., the Department of Veterans Affairs will apply the following sections: ( a ) Section 21.4200—Definitions (with the exception of paragraph (a)). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241; Pub. L. 94-502, Pub. L. 99-576)
( b ) Section 21.4201—Restrictions on enrollment; percentage of students receiving financial support. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3473(d))
( c ) Section 21.4202—Overcharges; restrictions on enrollments. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3690)
( d ) Section 21.4203—Reports—Requirements. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3684; Pub. L. 94-502, Pub. L. 99-576)
( e ) Section 21.4204 (except paragraphs (a) and (e))-Periodic certifications. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3684)
( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) Section 21.4206—Reporting fee.
( h ) Section 21.4209—Examination of records. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3690; Pub. L. 94-502, Pub. L. 99-576)
( i ) Section 21.4210—Suspension and discontinuance of educational assistance payments and of enrollments or reenrollments for pursuit of approved courses.
( j ) Section 21.4211—Composition, jurisdiction, and duties of Committee on Educational Allowances.
( k ) Section 21.4212—Referral to Committee on Educational Allowances.
( l ) Section 21.4213—Notice of hearing by Committee on Educational Allowances.
( m ) Section 21.4214—Hearing rules and procedures for Committee on Educational Allowances.
( n ) Section 21.4215—Decision of Director of VA facility of jurisdiction.
( o ) Section 21.4216—Review of decision of Director of VA facility of jurisdiction.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3241(a), 3690)
[45 FR 31, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 34499, Sept. 7, 1988; 57 FR 38613, Aug. 26, 1992; 61 FR 1526, Jan. 22, 1996; 61 FR 29030, June 7, 1996; 63 FR 35836, July 1, 1998; 72 FR 16978, Apr. 5, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### §§ 3.376-3.377 [Reserved]
NO. 07-02-0067-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MARCH 7, 2002

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ, A CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 91-533,594; HONORABLE DREW FARMER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Appellant Jesus Martinez perfected an appeal from a default judgment modifying support in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.  Pending before this Court is appellant’s “Withdrawal of Notice of Restricted Appeal” by which he expresses his desire to no longer pursue this appeal.  We grant his request and dismiss the appeal.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s request is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice

Do not publish.
§ 40.11 Interstate. ( a ) The Secretary is responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development that have an impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in States which have adopted a process and which select VA's program or activity.
( 3 ) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected State, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities in those States that have not adopted a process under the order or do not select VA's program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 40.10 of this part if the Secretary receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with VA have been delegated, or
( b ) The Secretary uses the procedures in § 40.10 if a State process provides a State process recommendation to VA through a single point of contact.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
# C_2015026EN.01001902.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/19

---

Appeal brought on 21 November 2014 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 11 September 2014 in Case T-425/11 Greece v Commission

Greece

Commission

(Case C-530/14 P)

(2015/C 026/23)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and P.J. Loewenthal)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Hellenic Republic

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2014, notified to the Commission on 12 September 2014, in Case Τ-425/11 Greece v Commission (ECLI:EU:T:2014:768); |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2014, notified to the Commission on 12 September 2014, in Case Τ-425/11 Greece v Commission (ECLI:EU:T:2014:768);

Greece

Commission

| — | refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule again; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule again;

| — | reserve the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is based on a single ground: the General Court misinterpreted and misapplied Article 107(1) TFEU in ruling that the contested measure did not provide any advantage for the public casinos. The single ground of appeal advanced by the Commission has three parts.

First, in paragraphs 52 to 58 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court infringed Article 107(1) TFEU in ruling that the public casinos did not enjoy an advantage from the payment of a lower tax for each entering customer on the basis of the contested measure, since the amounts paid represented 80 % of the mandatory entry fees which were charged by both the private and public casinos.

Second, in paragraphs 59 to 68 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court infringed Article 107(1) TFEU in ruling that it was not sufficient for the Commission to define the advantage of the contested measures as direct (de jure) tax discrimination, but that the Commission was obliged to base the existence of an advantage on an economic analysis of the effects of the contested measure.

Third, in paragraphs 74 to 80 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court infringed Article 107(1) TFEU in ruling that (i) the practice of free entry could not confirm the advantage of the contested measure since that measure did not provide any advantage and (ii) before that argument could be effective the Commission was bound to provide evidence that in practice the number of free entries granted was excessively high in comparison with the objectives of the Greek legislation which permitted that practice, so as to be incompatible with the conditions of that national legislation.

---
§ 200.8 AFRH participation in NEPA compliance by other agencies. ( a ) AFRH may participate in the NEPA process as a cooperating agency for another lead agency's project, or as a commenter/reviewer of another agency's NEPA document. AFRH may also participate in environmental studies carried out by non-Federal parties (for example, a local government conducting studies under a State environmental policy law) where such studies are relevant to AFRH's interests or may be incorporated by AFRH into its own studies under NEPA. Where AFRH will be responsible for a decision on a project that is the subject of such a study, and has the authority to do so, AFRH will ensure that the study and its resulting documents meet the standards set forth in these regulations in coordination with the COO.
( b ) As a cooperating agency, AFRH participates in the NEPA process as requested by the lead agency, in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.6 of the CEQ regulations. Tasks may include participating in meetings and providing specific information relevant to the matters over which it has jurisdiction by law or expertise.
( c ) AFRH comments shall be prepared in consultation with, or by, the Master Planner.
( d ) The responsible AFRH official may provide comments and/or reviews of another agency's NEPA documents, and/or other Federal and State environmental documents.
( e ) AFRH comments shall be provided in accordance with 40 CFR 1503.3.
§ 59.60 Additional application requirements. For a project to be eligible for a grant under this part for the fiscal year for which the priority list was made, during that fiscal year the State must submit to VA an original and a copy of the following: ( a ) Complete, updated Standard Forms 424 (mark the box labeled application and submit the information requested for an application), 424C, and 424D (these forms are available on the internet Web site provided in § 59.170 of this part), and
( b ) A completed VA Form 10-0388-5 and all information and documentation specified by VA Form 10-0388-5 (this form is available on the internet Web site provided in § 59.170).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1742, 8105, 8131-8137)
[66 FR 33847, June 26, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 58880, Oct. 8, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.174 Correction of Office mistake.

Whenever Office records clearly disclose a material mistake in a registration, incurred through the fault of the Office, the Office will issue a certificate of correction stating the fact and nature of the mistake, signed by the Director or by an employee designated by the Director, without charge. Thereafter, the corrected certificate shall have the same effect as if it had been originally issued in the corrected form. In the discretion of the Director, the Office may issue a new certificate of registration without charge.

[73 FR 67774, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Skip to Main Content

Library of CongressResearch Guides

      - Library of Congress
      - Research Guides
      - Law Library
      - Home

The Library of Congress welcomes researchers to its reading rooms and research centers. Appointments are **optional**, but **encouraged** to serve you best, ensure collection material is accessible during your visit and optimize your time at the Library. The Thomas Jefferson Building has reopened to visitors via timed, ticketed entry—learn how to obtain a timed-entry pass. Virtual events and online services continue to be available.

# Law Library of Congress

Research guides provide a starting point for researching legal topics and recommend relevant materials in the Law Library's collections and online. The Law Library creates research guides that range from animal and landlord-tenant law to instructions for compiling a federal legislative history. Established by Congress in 1832, the Law Library has a collection of over 2.9 million volumes spanning all systems and periods of law and covering all the nations of the world. Please note that although research guides are selective, inclusion of a site or resource does not constitute endorsement by the Law Library of Congress.  None of the information in any of our research guides is legal advice. LC Bibliographies, Research Guides and Finding Aids page.

            -                -  BY SUBJECT 
              -  ALL GUIDES 
            -  Search:Search this GroupSearch 

## 

## Have a question? Need assistance?

Ask a Librarian

## A-Z Database List

Go to A-Z List

Login to LibApps

**title**

** Back to top

Library of Congress LegalSpringShare Privacy Policy
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-094-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.H., J.H., C.H.,	APPELLANT

AND Z.H., CHILDREN

	------------

	FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On March 26, 2007 and April 9, 2007, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.  

DELIVERED:  May 31, 2007
§ 42.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Other matters that may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ may issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
#### PALMER V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon.

E. B. & K. V. Fite, and A. H. Carmichael, for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Palmer v. The State,*2 Ala. App. 265, 56 South. 50.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
                       
<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<CASH>                          12,582
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   27,791
<ALLOWANCES>                       428
<INVENTORY>                     25,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                70,859
<PP&E>                          52,643
<DEPRECIATION>                  24,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 100,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           25,626
<BONDS>                              0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           593
<OTHER-SE>                      69,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   100,180
<SALES>                         42,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   32,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 6,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,356
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,114
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .23
        

</TABLE>