alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An equal opportunity employer Thomas M. Gray 211(b) Technical Manager 1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005

- 4070

Tel 202

- 682

- 84 80

Fax 202

- 682

- 8 270

E

- mail grayt @api.org

March 2 3 , 201 1

Karl Simon

Division Director Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Mail Code: 6406J Washington, DC 20460

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Final Submission

for 211(b) (Docket No. A

- 90

- 07) Final Report : Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13

- Week Whole

- Body Inhalation Toxicity Study

in Rats with Neu rotoxicity Assessments and a 4

- Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity

Assessments ( HLS Study No. 00

- 6129 )

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the

f ollowing information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13

- Week Whole Body Inhalation Toxicity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and a 4

- Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments ( HLS Study No. 00

- 6129 )

The Final Report has undergone review by two independent peer

- reviewers, EPA, outside QA/QC, and the 211(b)

T echnical W orkgroup. Therefor e the report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A

- 90

- 07).

T he EPA Memorandum (Hauchman to Oge, April 27

, 2010 ) requested that Summary and Conclusion sections of the report be revised at the time of final report submission. The RG response to the EPA comments is attached to

this transmittal letter. If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please

contact me.

Regards,

Thomas M. Gray , M.S., DABT

Encl ( 2 ): F inal report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A 13

- Week Whole

- Body Inhalation Toxicity Study

in Rats with Neurotoxicit y Assessments and a 4

- Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity

Assessments ( HLS Study No. 00

- 6129

RG r esponse to comments in EPA M emo randu m (Hauchman to Oge, April 27, 2010 )Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Harary
    Joseph M. Harary
    President, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
    November 8, 2005
§ 21.5053 Restoration of contributions (Persian Gulf War). ( a ) *Restoration of contributions when no entitlement is charged.* If the provisions of § 21.5072(i) require that a veteran's entitlement not be charged for a payment or payments he or she received, the amount of the veteran's contributions which were included in the payment or payments will be restored to the fund by the Department of Defense. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3235; Pub. L. 102-127) (Oct. 10, 1991)
( b ) *Restored contributions are treated like other contributions.* VA will treat contributions which have been restored under paragraph (a) of this section as though the veterans had contributed them for all purposes including— ( 1 ) Computing the veteran's monthly rates and benefit payments under § 21.5138, and
( 2 ) Determining any refund which may become due the veteran under §§ 21.5064 and 21.5065.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3235; Pub. L. 102-127) (Oct. 10, 1991)
[58 FR 34369, June 25, 1993]
2/25/2015 Underground Injection Control Query

http://webapps2.rrc.state.tx.us/EWA/uicQueryAction.do 1/2

Oil & Gas Data Query

Query Menu Help

Injection & Disposal Query Criteria

Enter your search criteria and click on Submit to view the results.

Search Criteria

Choose One: Oil Wells Gas Wells Both

District: None Selected

Oil Lease No./Gas Well ID No: Search for Lease

County: None Selected

Field(s): Search for Field

Operator(s): Search for Operator

UIC No.:

Original Authority Date: (MM/DD/YYYY) to (MM/DD/YYYY)

API Unique No.: 42 ­ ­

Top Injection Zone Depth: Between and

Bottom Injection Zone Depth: Between and

***H­1 No.:

***W­14 No.:
2/25/2015 Underground Injection Control Query

http://webapps2.rrc.state.tx.us/EWA/uicQueryAction.do 2/2

Return

H­10 Status: None Selected

Permitted Fluid: None Selected

Injection Type: None Selected

Special Conditions: None Selected

*** If an H­1 No. is entered, a W­14 cannot be entered at the same time. The same is true when entering a W­14 No.

Submit Reset

Disclaimer | RRC Home | Contact
#### THE UNITED STATES v. FLANNERY ET AL., EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES J. FLANNERY, DECEASED

[59 C. Cls. 719; 268 U. S. 98]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was reversed, the Supreme Court deciding:

1. The revenue act of 1918 provided that net income should include- “ gains ” derived from sales or dealings in property, sections. 212 (a) and 213 (a) ; that there should be allowed as deductions “losses” sustained during the taxable year “incurred in any transaction entered into for profit,” section 214 (a) ; *1027and that “for the purpose of ascertaining the gain derived or loss sustained from the sale or other disposition of property * * * the basis shall be — (1) In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, the fair market value of such property as of that date; and (2) In the case of property acquired on or after that date, the cost thereof.” Section 202 (a). *Held,;*

April 13, 1925.

(a) That the provisions of the act in reference to the gains derived and the losses sustained from the sale of property acquired before March 1, 1913, were correlative, and that whatever effect was intended to be given to the market value of property on that date in determining taxable gains, a corresponding effect was intended to be given to such market value in determining deductible losses;

(b) That the act of 1918 imposed a tax and allowed a deduction to the extent only that an actual gain was derived or an actual loss sustained from the investment, and the provision in reference to the market value on March 1, 1913, was applicable only where there was such an actual gain or loss; that is, that this provision was merely a limitation upon the amount of the actual gain or loss that would otherwise have been taxable or deductible. *Goodrich*v. *Edwards,*255 U. S. 527; *Walsh*v. *Brewster, id.*536.

2. Decisions of this court affecting the business interests of the country should not be disturbed except upon the most cogent reasons.

Mr. Justice SaNpoed

delivered the opinion of tbe Supreme Court
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2488 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2488

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax on 
                distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

Ms. Berkley (for herself, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Berry, Mr. Burton 
  of Indiana, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Crowley, Mr. 
 Culberson, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mr. Lincoln Davis of Tennessee, Mr. 
 Doyle, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Hill, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Meeks 
     of New York, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
Radanovich, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Terry, 
 Mr. Towns, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax on 
                distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN RATE OF TAX ON DISTILLED SPIRITS TO PRE-1985 
              LEVELS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 5001(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition, rate, and attachment of 
tax) is amended by striking ``$13.50'' and inserting ``$10.50''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (a) of section 5010 of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``$13.50'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``$10.50''.
            (2) Subsection (f) of section 7652 of such Code is hereby 
        repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the first date that the Director of the Office of Management 
and Budget projects that--
            (1) there is a Federal budget surplus (determined without 
        regard to the income and expenditures of the social security 
        trust funds) for the fiscal year that includes such date, and
            (2) such surplus is not less than the aggregate revenue 
        reductions during such period resulting from the amendments 
        made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCCC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended


December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),


I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Company.





graphicName:
Bernard ZimmermanTitle:
President, Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
 Dated:   February 7, 2011
# Official Journal C 244/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 244 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6611 July 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 244

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6611 July 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 244/01 | Communication from the Commission extending the transitional period provided for in the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines concerning regional airports | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 244/01

Communication from the Commission extending the transitional period provided for in the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines concerning regional airports

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2023/C 244/02 | Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 4 |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 244/03 | Euro exchange rates – 10 July 2023 | 5 |
| 2023/C 244/04 | Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2023/C 244/02

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

4

European Commission

2023/C 244/03

Euro exchange rates – 10 July 2023

5

2023/C 244/04

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 244/05 | Publication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a protected designation of origin or protected geographical indication in the agricultural products and foodstuffs sector, as referred to in Article 6b(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014 | 8 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2023/C 244/05

Publication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a protected designation of origin or protected geographical indication in the agricultural products and foodstuffs sector, as referred to in Article 6b(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CandelaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 6, 2008 |                                   | /s/  Gerard E. Puorro |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |                  | Gerard E. Puorro                       |
|   |                  | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|        |                       |                                        |                       |  |

 

1

----
Amendment to Change in Control Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.44 
  
 FORM OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”), dated as of July 21, 2003, is made between CONSOL Energy, Inc., 1800 Washington Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
                         (the “Executive”). 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into a Change in Control Severance Agreement (“Agreement”) effective as of July 21,
2003 (the “Effective Date”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to clarify that the provisions of Section 6 of the Agreement, regarding the application of Section 280G of the Code to payments and benefits under the Agreement, are intended to supersede and
replace any provisions in any stock option agreement or other agreement between the Company and the Executive entered into prior to the Effective Date regarding the application of Section 280G of the Code to payments and benefits thereunder.

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and the Executive agree as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 6. Effective as of the Effective Date, the first sentence of Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor: “The provisions of
this Section 6 shall apply notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, and in addition, the provisions of this Section 6 shall supersede and replace any provision in any stock option agreement or other agreement entered into prior to
the Effective Date between the Executive and the Company which relates to the application of Section 280G or Section 4999 of the Code to any payments or benefits provided thereunder, including, without limitation, any provision reducing or limiting
such payments or benefits.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written. 
  

	CONSOL ENERGY, INC.
	
	 By:

	
	 
	

	 Name:

	 Title:


  

	EXECUTIVE
	
	 
	


  

 1
May 21, 2012

Mr. Fred Herschelman 3760 Winding Pine Dr. E.

Metamora, MI 48455

Dear Mr. Herschelman:

This is in response to your letter sent to Rebecca McPhereson, Office of General Counsel,Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA submitted your petition to the docket (No. FAA2012-0305). Your letter proposed the FAA implement immediately that all commercial passenger aircraft within US Airspace have direct feedback for flight controls between pilot and co-pilot.

Your letter was sent to the Transportation Airplane Directorate. They responded to you directly by letter dated May 10, 2012, signed by Dorenda D. Baker, Director, Aircraft

Certification Service.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT K.G., Respondent

v. E.D., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 199 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 3rd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Order entered October 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00146-CR

ESSIE D. HOPKINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-55764-U

ORDER

Appellant’s October 6, 2014 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED. The time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to November 4, 2014.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FREDRICK LEE AVERETTE, A.K.A.

FREDRICK LEE AVERETTE, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00067-CR

Appeal from the

405th District Court 

of Galveston County, Texas1

(TC# 13CR2940)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Fredrick Lee Averette is attempting to appeal his conviction for sexual assault of a child.

Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996) (en banc). In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of 

appeal is due within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed in open court, or ninety days 

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3.
2

after the sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. See 

TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(1), (2). While a court of appeals may extend the time to file the notice of 

appeal, both the notice of appeal and the extension motion must be filed within fifteen days after 

the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.3. In the absence of a timely 

filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the 

appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).

Here, the trial court entered the judgment of conviction on April 7, 2015. Appellant filed 

this notice of appeal on March 9, 2021. The notice of appeal was not timely filed, meaning that 

this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a direct appeal from his conviction at this point 

in time.2 To the extent Averette is requesting the remedy of an out-of-time appeal, only the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant Appellant an out-of-time appeal of his felony 

convictions. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (orig. 

proceeding) (en banc) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas 

Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

June 22, 2021

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

2 The clerk’s record does show that Averette filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on October 6, 2020. However, 

there is no indication the trial court ever ruled on this application. As such, the judgment of conviction is the only 

final appealable judgment appearing before us in the record.