alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 112–128—JUNE 5, 2012 126 STAT. 373 

Public Law 112–128 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue commercial use authorizations 

to commercial stock operators for operations in designated wilderness within 

the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sequoia and King Canyon 

National Parks Backcountry Access Act’’. 

SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL SERVICES AUTHORIZATIONS IN WILDERNESS 

WITHIN THE SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL 

PARKS. 

(a) CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY.—Until the date on which 

the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) completes any analysis and determination required under 

the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Secretary shall 

continue to issue authorizations to provide commercial services 

for commercial stock operations (including commercial use 

authorizations and concession contracts) within any area designated 

as wilderness in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 

(referred to in this section as the ‘‘Parks)’’ at use levels determined 

by the Secretary to be appropriate and subject to any terms and 

conditions that the Secretary determines to be appropriate. 

(b) WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PLAN.—Not later than 3 years 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete 

a wilderness stewardship plan with respect to the Parks. 

(c) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of the Secretary to issue authorizations under subsection (a) shall terminate 

on the earlier of— 

(1) the date on which the Secretary begins to issue 

authorizations to provide commercial services for commercial 

stock operations within any areas designated as wilderness 

in the Parks, as provided in a record of decision issued in 

accordance with a wilderness stewardship plan completed under 

subsection (b); or 

Deadline. 

Analysis. 

Determination. 

Sequoia and King 

Canyon National 

Parks 

Backcountry 

Access Act. 

June 5, 2012 

[H.R. 4849] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
126 STAT. 374 PUBLIC LAW 112–128—JUNE 5, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4849: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Apr. 27, considered and passed House. 

May 17, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

May 18, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

(2) the date that is 4 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

Approved June 5, 2012. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 107–158—APR. 4, 2002 116 STAT. 121

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2739:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Dec. 19, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): Mar. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–158

107th Congress

An Act

To amend Public Law 107–10 to authorize a United States plan to endorse and

obtain observer status for Taiwan at the annual summit of the World Health

Assembly in May 2002 in Geneva, Switzerland, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO PUBLIC LAW 107–10.

(a) FINDINGS.—Section 1(a) of Public Law 107–10 (115 Stat.

17) is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(12) On May 11, 2001, President Bush stated in his letter

to Senator Murkowski that the United States ‘should find

opportunities for Taiwan’s voice to be heard in international

organizations in order to make a contribution, even if membership is not possible’, further stating that his Administration

‘has focused on finding concrete ways for Taiwan to benefit

and contribute to the WHO.’.

‘‘(13) On May 16, 2001, as part of the United States delegation to the World Health Assembly meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson announced to the American International Club the Administration’s support of Taiwan’s participation in the activities of

the WHO.’’.

(b) PLAN.—Section 1(b)(1) of Public Law 107–10 (115 Stat.

17) is amended by striking ‘‘May 2001’’ and inserting ‘‘May 2002’’.

Approved April 4, 2002.

115 Stat. 18.

Apr. 4, 2002

[H.R. 2739]
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00694- CR

Lasaro Cort ez, Jr ., Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 639 90, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant L asar o Cortez was p la c e d o n d e f e r r e d a d judic ation community supervision afte r he pleade d g uilty to posse ssing more than one g ram of coca ine with intent to de liver and true to a previous felony conviction alleg ed for enhanc ement. See Tex. Hea lth & Safe t y Code Ann. § 481.112(a) , (c) (West 2010)
. The State late r moved to adjudica te, alleg ing two violations of the conditions of supervision. Following a hear ing, the trial court found the alleg ations to be true, adjudg ed appe llant guilty , and imposed a f ourtee n-y ear

prison sentenc e. I n his only issue on appea l, appellant contends that the evidenc e does not support the
cour t ’s order that he pay $565 in attorney ’s fee s. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.05(g ) (West Supp. 2010); Mayer v. State , 309 S.W .3d 552, 556-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The State
conce des that there is no evidenc e of a materia l chang e in appellant’ s financ ial status subsequent to his being found indig ent.The iss ue is sustained. The judgment of conviction i s m odified t o delete the order

that appellant pa

y $565 in attorney ’s fe es. As modified, the judg ment is affirme d.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Modified and, a s Modified, Aff irmed Filed: Aug ust 18, 2011 Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Mintz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tofutti Brands Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: May 13, 2003

/s/David Mintz*
---------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
§ 1.985 Form, notice of, and conduct of hearing. ( a ) After an employee requests a hearing, the hearing official or administrative law judge shall notify the employee of the form of the hearing to be provided. If the hearing will be oral, the notice shall set forth the date, time, and location for the hearing. If the hearing will be paper, the employee shall be notified that he or she should submit his or her position and arguments in writing to the hearing official or administrative law judge by a specified date after which the record shall be closed. This date shall give the employee reasonable time to submit this information.
( b ) An employee who requests an oral hearing shall be provided an oral hearing if the hearing official or administrative law judge determines that the matter cannot be resolved by review of documentary evidence, for example, when an issue of credibility or veracity is involved. If a determination is made to provide an oral hearing, the hearing official or administrative law judge may offer the employee the opportunity for a hearing by telephone conference call. If this offer is rejected or if the hearing official or administrative law judge declines to offer a telephone conference call hearing, the employee shall be provided an oral hearing permitting the personal appearance of the employee, his or her personal representative, and witnesses. A record or transcript of every oral hearing shall be made. Witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation. VA shall not be responsible for the payment of any expenses incident to attendance at the hearing which are incurred by either the employee, his or her representative or Counsel, or witnesses.
( c ) In all other cases where an employee requests a hearing, a paper hearing shall be provided. A paper hearing shall consist of a review of the written evidence of record by the administrative law judge or hearing official.
( d ) In any hearing under this section, the administrative law judge or hearing official may exclude from consideration evidence or testimony which is irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIRO BRAVO PEDROZA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-55784

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01766-LABWVG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry Alan Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Jairo Bravo Pedroza appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 288 (1971), alleging Fifth Amendment and

FILED

NOV 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-55784

malicious prosecution claims in connection with defendants’ decision to

commence removal proceedings against him and his detention incident to those

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Vestron, Inc. v. Home Box Office

Inc., 839 F.2d 1380, 1381 (9th Cir. 1988). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Pedroza’s action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). See Reno v. Am.-Arab AntiDiscrimination Comm., 525 U.S. 471, 482-88 (1999). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Pedroza leave to

amend because further amendment would have been futile in light of the

jurisdictional bar. See L.A. Mem’l Coliseum Comm’n v. City of Oakland, 717 F.2d

470, 473 (9th Cir. 1983) (setting forth standard of review). 

The district court properly declined to file the post-judgment motions

Pedroza submitted after filing his notice of appeal. See Vroman v. United States,

997 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam).

We do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v.

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.3

                                 Default Notice


                                                                November 5, 2003

VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Fax 631-254-2136
FEDEX OVERNIGHT MAIL
CERTIFIED MAIL:  RRR

Robert Rubin, individually
And as President, CEO and Chairman of
American United Global, Inc.
25 Highland Blvd.
Dix Hills, New York  11756

              Re:      Default under Closing Agreement dated June 16, 2003
                       Default under Standstill Agreement dated October 23, 2003

Dear Bob:

     Reference is made to that certain  Closing  Agreement  dated as of June 16,
2003 (the "Closing  Agreement"),  among American United Global,  Inc.  ("AUGI"),
Tracy  Landow,   Redwood  Investments   Associates,   L.P.  a  Delaware  limited
partnership  (Redwood),  myself  and  others and a  standstill  Agreement  dated
October 23, 2003 between  AUGI,  Tracy Landow,  Redwood and myself.  Capitalized
terms not otherwise  defined in this letter shall have the meanings  assigned to
such terms in the Closing Agreement.

     The outstanding principal balance of the Landow Note exceeded $1,000,000 on
October 17, 2003 constituting a Default Event under the Closing Agreement, which
provides  that in such event the Sale of NYMI may be  requested by me. Under the
Standstill Agreement, I agreed not to request the Sale of NYMI until 5:01 PM EST
on October 31, 2003 at which time all Payment Events would have been required to
be consummated.

     Let this letter serve as notice that a Default Event existed on October 31,
2003 at 5:01 PM EST and continues.  I hereby  exercise my rights under Section 4
of the  Closing  Agreement  to  request  the Sale of NYMI.  This  letter  is not
intended  and  should  not be  construed  as a waiver  of any of my  rights  and
entitlements  as  otherwise  provided  for  in the  Closing  Agreement  and  the
Standstill Agreement.

                                                      Sincerely yours,


                                                      /s/ Jonathan S. Landow
                                                      Jonathan S. Landow, M.D.
                                                      President and CEO
                                                      New York Medical, Inc.


cc:      Steven Weiss, Esq.
         Gersten, Savage, Kaplowitz, Wolf & Marcus, LLP
         Fax 212 980-5192
1 

Filed 3/7/13 P. v. Vargas CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

COPY 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or 

ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for 

purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Sacramento) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

DOMINGO GARCIA VARGAS, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C067801 

(Super. Ct. No. 09F05780) 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION 

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] 

 THE COURT: 

 It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 19, 2013, be modified as 

follows: 

 On page 11, the first paragraph of section II, in the first sentence “K.B.” is 

changed to “S.G.” so the sentence reads: 
2 

 Defendant was convicted of both forcible sexual penetration (§ 289(a)(1)) and 

assault with intent to commit forcible sexual penetration (§§ 220/289(a)(1)) of 

S.G. 

 There is no change in the judgment. 

 HULL , J. 

We concur: 

 RAYE , P. J. 

 ROBIE , J.
§ 4.122 Psychomotor epilepsy. The term psychomotor epilepsy refers to a condition that is characterized by seizures and not uncommonly by a chronic psychiatric disturbance as well. ( a ) Psychomotor seizures consist of episodic alterations in conscious control that may be associated with automatic states, generalized convulsions, random motor movements (chewing, lip smacking, fumbling), hallucinatory phenomena (involving taste, smell, sound, vision), perceptual illusions (deja vu, feelings of loneliness, strangeness, macropsia, micropsia, dreamy states), alterations in thinking (not open to reason), alterations in memory, abnormalities of mood or affect (fear, alarm, terror, anger, dread, well-being), and autonomic disturbances (sweating, pallor, flushing of the face, visceral phenomena such as nausea, vomiting, defecation, a rising feeling of warmth in the abdomen). Automatic states or automatisms are characterized by episodes of irrational, irrelevant, disjointed, unconventional, asocial, purposeless though seemingly coordinated and purposeful, confused or inappropriate activity of one to several minutes (or, infrequently, hours) duration with subsequent amnesia for the seizure. Examples: A person of high social standing remained seated, muttered angrily, and rubbed the arms of his chair while the National Anthem was being played; an apparently normal person suddenly disrobed in public; a man traded an expensive automobile for an antiquated automobile in poor mechanical condition and after regaining conscious control, discovered that he had signed an agreement to pay an additional sum of money in the trade. The seizure manifestations of psychomotor epilepsy vary from patient to patient and in the same patient from seizure to seizure.
( b ) A chronic mental disorder is not uncommon as an interseizure manifestation of psychomotor epilepsy and may include psychiatric disturbances extending from minimal anxiety to severe personality disorder (as distinguished from developmental) or almost complete personality disintegration (psychosis). The manifestations of a chronic mental disorder associated with psychomotor epilepsy, like those of the seizures, are protean in character.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ENRIQUE MARTINEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00320-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120D02642)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order this decision be certified below 

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                           APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                               150
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      3,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         (39)
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                               151
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (134)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     3,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                968
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                             587
<OTHER-SE>                                                         1,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       3,400
<SALES>                                                               361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      361
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       155
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         (140)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          295
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0.25



</TABLE>
Order filed, October 08, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00717

- CV

____________ GLOBAL NEW MILLENIUM PARTNERS, LTD. , Appellant

V.
SOUTHWEST READY MIX, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 66078



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due October 03, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been file d with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sheri Ullrich , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021(the “Report”) of SLR HC BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of theRegistrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/ Michael S. Gross
**Name:** Michael S. Gross**Date**: March 1, 2022
 
**