alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00317-CV

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CIV-19-0018

AND

No. 02-21-00318-CV

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CIV-21-0663

ORDER

On the court’s own motion, the court has determined that the above 

referenced appeals should be consolidated.

IN THE INTEREST OF A.W., A CHILD

IN THE INTEREST OF W.W., A CHILD

FILE COPY
2

It is therefore ORDERED that appellate cause number 02-21-00317-CV, In the 

Interest of A.W., a Child is consolidated with appellate cause number 02-21-00318-CV, 

In the Interest of W.W., a Child. Each appeal shall continue to bear its respective cause 

number. 

In appellate cause number 02-21-00318-CV, trial court case number CIV-21-

0663, In the Interest of W.W., a Child, the court has received a copy of the trial court’s 

“Agreed Order Terminating Parental Rights and Agreed Order in Suit Affecting the 

Parent-Child Relationship,” which was signed November 30, 3021, after a notice of 

appeal was prematurely filed on October 4, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(a) 

(providing that in a civil case, a prematurely filed notice of appeal is effect and 

deemed filed on the day of, but after, the event that begins the period for perfecting 

the appeal). Therefore, we are continuing that appeal, and the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s record are due immediately.1

In appellate cause number 02-21-00317-CV, trial court case number CIV-19-

0018, In the Interest of A.W., a Child, we have notified appellant father for a third time 

to make payment arrangements with the court reporter for the preparation of the 

reporter’s record by Monday, January 31, 2022. 

Additionally, attorney Michael G. Maloney, who represented the appellant in 

the trial court, filed a motion to withdraw in appellate cause number 02-21-00317-CV, 

which this court granted. However, Mr. Maloney did not file a motion to withdraw in 

1To the extent that the designated reporter’s record for both appeals is the 

same, only one reporter’s record need be filed. 

FILE COPY
3

appellate cause number 02-21-00318-CV. Therefore, this court has not withdrawn 

him from appellate cause number 02-21-00318-CV.

We direct the clerk of this court to send a notice of this order to the appellant, 

the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court 

reporter.

Dated February 2, 2022.

Per Curiam

FILE COPY
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1541

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. GREEN DOT CORPORATION; GREEN DOT BANK; FINGERHUT; BLUESTEM SALES, INC.; EXPERIAN DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN SERVICES CORP.; TRANSUNION DATA SOLUTIONS LLC; TRANSUNION LLC; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; DOES , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J . Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:22

- cv - 00109

- RJC

- DCK )

Submitted : November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Camille R. Nicodemus, SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES PC, Zionsville, Indiana, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order denying McDaniel’s (a) application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP); and (b) motion for District Judge Conrad ’s recusal . We have jurisdiction over that part of the order denying McDaniel’s IFP application because an ord er denying “a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is an appealable [interlocutory] order

. ” Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam) . However, on appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. S ee 4th Ci r. R. 34(b). Because McDaniel’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s rationale for denying her IFP application, McDaniel has forfeited appellate review of that portion of the appealed

- from order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 1 77 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm as to this part of the court’s order. Turning to the remainder of this appea l, t his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). While McDaniel’ s informal brief restates her allegations of judicial bias, that portion of the appealed

- from order

— specifically, Judge Conrad’s denial of McDaniel’s recusal motion

— is not an immediately appealable interlocutory or collateral ruling

. See In re Va. Elec. & Power Co. , 539 F.2d 357, 363

- 64 (4th Cir. 1976). Accordingly, we dismiss the remainder of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART , DISMISSED IN PART USCA4 Appeal: 22-1541 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
#### § 21.3030 Claims.

The provisions of subpart B of this part apply with respect to submission of a claim for educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35, VA actions upon receiving a claim, and time limits connected with claims.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3513, 5101, 5102, 5103)

[64 FR 23772, May 4, 1999]
# Official Journal C 183A/4 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 183A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 584 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 183A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 584 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 183A/01 | Notice of open competitions — Doctors (AD 11) — EPSO/AD/308/15 — Brussels site — EPSO/AD/309/15 — Luxembourg and Ispra sites | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 183A/01

Notice of open competitions — Doctors (AD 11) — EPSO/AD/308/15 — Brussels site — EPSO/AD/309/15 — Luxembourg and Ispra sites

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OY AL P OR T E R Mc HE NR Y, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y S H E R IF F ’S D E P A R T M E N T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 55447 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 7 3 3 8 - R - J WJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R o yal P o rt er M cH en ry, an i n m at e i n L o s A n g el es C o u n ty Jai l , ap p eal s p ro se f r o m th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s j u d g me n td i s mi s s i n g , w i th o u tp r e j u d i c e , h i s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 98 3 act i on for f

ai l ure t o com pl y w i th a courtorder. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED APR21 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , P a g ta lu n a n v. G a la za , 291 F. 3 d6 3 9 , 6 4 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n di s m i s s i ng the a c t i on b e c au s e M c H e n ryf

a ile d to c o m p lyw ith th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rr e q u ir in g h im to f ile a n a m e n d e d c o m p la in t w ith in as p e c if ie dtim e p e r io d . Se e i d. a t642–43 ( di s c us s i ng f

a c t or s ac ourtm us tw e i gh t o de t e rm i ne w he the rt o di s m i s s ac l a i m f or f a ilu r e to c o m p lyw ith ac o u rt o r d e r ) . F u rth e r , M c H e n rya s k e dth e d is tr ic t c o u rt to di sm i ss thi s a ct i on . T o the ext entM cH enrysoug htt o st and o n the ori gi nal com pl ai nt , w e a gree w i th the m agi stra t e j ud ge’ s orderof D ec em ber 4, 20 07 , that th e c o m p la in t f

a ile dto a lle g e s u f

f ic ie n t f a c ts to p u t d e f

e n d a n ts o n n o tic e o f

ac la im a g a i n s tth e m. W e d o n o t c o n s id e ris s u e s n o t p r o p e r lyr a is e db e f o r e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. See Sm i th v. M

a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). M cH enry ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 26, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00332

- CV

In re Commitment of Aaron Gipson

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPIN ION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on March 8, 2018

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The State

shall pay all costs relating to this app eal, both in this Court an d in the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2369 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2369

    To extend the authorization of appropriations for the Office of 
              Government Ethics through fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2007

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the authorization of appropriations for the Office of 
              Government Ethics through fiscal year 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR OFFICE OF 
              GOVERNMENT ETHICS.

    Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and inserting ``each of 
fiscal years 2008 through 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 23.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0463

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DALLAS PETERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until April 6, 2022, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 1 2022

03/01/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0463
#### Caleb T. Ames et al., Appellants, *v.*Samuel McMillan, Respondent.

Appeal from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.

W. H. Knox, for appellants.

Whalen & Dunn, for respondent

*Per Ouriam.*

The only question involved in this appeal is one of fact, which has been resolved by the Trial Court in favor of the defendant We are asked to reverse on the ground that the evidence preponderated in favor of the appellants, but under a long line of decisions in the Court of Common Pleas as well as in this court, such a condition must be obvious and indisputable to justify the Appellate Court in taking such action, a situation which does not at all exist in the case at bar. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Present: Beekmae, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmae, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

September 11, 2015

Scott Brumley

Potter County Attorney's Office

500 S Fillmore St., Room 301

Amarillo, TX 79101-2437

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Brooks Barfield, Jr.

BARFIELD LAW FIRM

P. O. Box 308

Amarillo, TX 79105-0308

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00205-CR, 07-15-00206-CR, 07-15-00207-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 141066, 141094, 141118

Style: Daniel Lee Ainsworth v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

Appellant’s corrected brief was filed on Thursday, September 10, 2015. The

corrected brief will be deemed and referred to as Appellant’s brief.

Pursuant to direction of the court, Appellant’s original, uncorrected brief has been

stricken. The original, uncorrected brief will be retained for administrative purposes

only.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2490 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2490

   To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a pilot 
    program for the mobile biometric identification in the maritime 
environment of aliens unlawfully attempting to enter the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Souder, and Mr. 
  David Davis of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a pilot 
    program for the mobile biometric identification in the maritime 
environment of aliens unlawfully attempting to enter the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION OF UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a 
pilot program for the mobile biometric identification in the maritime 
environment of aliens unlawfully attempting to enter the United States.
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary shall ensure that the pilot 
program is coordinated with other biometric identification programs 
within the Department of Homeland Security and shall evaluate the costs 
and feasibility of expanding the capability to all appropriate 
Department of Homeland Security maritime vessels.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section for fiscal year 
2008.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 87A/23 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 87A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6523 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 87A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6523 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2022/C 87 A/01 | Call for applications | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2022/C 87 A/01

Call for applications

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered July 26, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00618-CV

DONALD DAVIS, Appellant

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-07331

ORDER

Before the Court is pro se appellant’s July 24, 2017 “Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Appellant’s Brief and Notice of Late Filed Clerk’s Record.” Appellant is indigent and 

incarcerated. Although appellant asserts in his motion that the clerk’s record has not been filed, 

the clerk’s record was filed with this Court on July 19, 2017. 

We GRANT appellant’s motion as follows: we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send 

appellant a paper copy of the clerk’s record and we ORDER appellant to file a brief by August 

31, 2017.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
11/29/201 0 11:0 9 FA X 202493514 2 FA A DM S 1001/00 1 

# o U.S
. Departmen l O f Transportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic eo f Rcsiona l Counse l Novembe r

10,201 0 Northwes t Mountai nRegio n Colorado , Idaho , Montana , Oregon , Utah , Washington , Wyoming

Honorabl eRichar dC
. Ooodwi n AdrmTiisti'atTvc La w Juclgc — Offic eo f Hearings , M-20 , Roo m541 1 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportaiio n 40 0 Sevent hStreet , S W Washington , D C 2059 0 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc eAvenu eS W Washington , D.C
. 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AOC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suii c 2WI0O 0 Re : Pete r

Simon s - 2009NM700173 , CP10NM000 4 160 1 Lin dAvenu eS.W
. Renton , Washingto n9805 7 Tel ; (425)227-141 7 Tax : (425 ) 227-100 7 SCOTT.MORlUS.@FAA.GO V

J O > ^ ^

V J J O 

# ^OlD'O^i ^

Dea r Judg eGoodwin : Thi s i s t o infon nyo u tha t w e hav e settle dth e above-reference dcase . Therefore , w ehereb y withdra w ou r

Complain t

date dMa y 21 , 2010
. Sincerely ,

TS
. WTTLIAM S Regiona l Counse l
cc : Pet eSimon, ? and/o r Gar y Pollac k 221 6 N
. Farragu t

Avenu e Colorad o Springs , C O 8090 7
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59577-59578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23979]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0439; FRL-9364-3]

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of 
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of pesticide petition; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of Wednesday, July 
25, 2012, concerning Pesticide Petition (PP) 2F8026, which requests to 
establish tolerances for residues of the herbicide pyroxasulfone and 
its metabolites in or on wheat (grain, straw, forage, and hay). This 
document corrects a typographical error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Walsh, Registration Division 
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone 
number: (703) 308-2972; email address: walsh.michael@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the notice a list of those who may be 
potentially affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0439, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The

[[Page 59578]]

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What does this correction do?

    The preamble for FR Doc. 2012-17899, published in the Federal 
Register of Wednesday, July 25, 2012 (77 FR 43562) (FRL-9353-6), is 
corrected as follows: On page 43565, second column, first full 
paragraph, item ``13.,'' line 24, correct ``wheat, grain at 0.6 ppm'' 
to read ``wheat, straw at 0.6 ppm.''

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, 
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: September 21, 2012.
 Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-23979 Filed 9-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```