alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 8, 2021
No. 04-20-00467-CV
IN THE COMMITMENT OF STEPHEN PATRICK BLACK From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-1805-CV Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant Stephen Patrick Black seeks to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory “Biennial Review Order” signed on August 5, 2020 finding that “probable cause does not exist to believe that [Black’s] behavioral abnormality has changed to the extent that he is no longer likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence.” The order did not modify any of the requirements of Black’s civil commitment pursuant to Chapter 841 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and provided that “[a]ll requirements of the Final Judgment and Order of Commitment signed on April 7, 2016 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.” As we noted in our previous opinion addressing our jurisdiction over Black’s appeal from his first biennial review order, the legislature did not specifically authorize an appeal from the trial court’s initial probable cause determination in a biennial review and a biennial review order finding no probable cause does not constitute a final judgment. See In re Commitment of Black , 594 S.W.3d 590, 593 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2019, no pet.); see also T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 841.101-.103 (biennial review process), § 841.062(a) (specific authorization to appeal the factfinder’s determination after a trial that a person is a sexually violent predator). Absent a final judgment or specific legislative authorization to appeal an interlocutory order, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. In re Commitment of Black , 594 S.W.3d at 593; see also In re Commitment of Richards , 395 S.W.3d 905, 908 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2013, pet. denied); In re Graves , No. 09- 17-00287-CV, 2017 WL 4319886, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). We note that Black filed a motion requesting permission to appeal the interlocutory order which was denied by the trial court. Accordingly, because it appears that we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we order appellant Black to show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order stating (i) why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and (ii) why this appeal is not frivolous. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f), 45. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal._________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 17.42 Examinations on an outpatient basis.

Physical examinations on an outpatient basis may be furnished to applicants who have been tentatively determined to be eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or domiciliary care to determine their need for such care and to the same categories of persons for whom hospitalization for observation and examination may be authorized under § 17.41.

[35 FR 6586, Apr. 24, 1970. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21965, 21966, May 13, 1996]
§ 21.5270 Assessment and pursuit of course. In the administration of benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 32, VA shall apply the following sections. ( a ) Section 21.4270 (except those portions of the paragraph and footnotes dealing with farm cooperative training)—Measurement of courses. For the purpose of benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 32 that training identified in § 21.4270 as less than one-half and more than one-quarter time will be treated as one-quarter-time training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3688; Pub. L. 94-502, Pub. L. 99-576, Pub. L. 100-689)
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Section 21.4272—Collegiate course measurement. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3688)
( d ) Section 21.4273—Collegiate graduate.
( e ) Section 21.4274—Law courses.
( f ) Section 21.4275—Practical training courses; measurement. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3688)
( g ) Section 21.4277—Discontinuance; unsatisfactory progress, conduct, and attendance.
( h ) Section 21.4278—Reentrance after discontinuance. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3474)
( i ) Section 21.4279—Combination correspondence-residence program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3688)
( j ) [Reserved]
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3473)
[45 FR 31, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 34499, Sept. 7, 1988; 55 FR 31584, Aug. 3, 1990; 61 FR 7218, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 55760, Oct. 28, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50
<INVENTORY>                                  1,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,108
<PP&E>                                       1,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,360
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,503
<COMMON>                                        32
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,684
<SALES>                                        956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               936
<CGS>                                          446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.000)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                             Compensation Agreement
                                     between
                    Guardian Technologies International, Inc.
                                       and
                               Telinks Canada Inc.

On this 18th day of September, 2003, the following parties, Guardian
Technologies International, Inc. (GDTI), 21351 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 300,
Dulles, Virginia 20166 and Telinks Canada, Inc. (Telinks), 3250 Ridgeway Drive,
Suite 17, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 5Y6 Canada hereby enter into a Compensation
Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are as follows:

1. TERM:

              The initial term of the Agreement will be for one (1) year with
              automatic two (2) year renewals unless either party has given
              written notice of an intention to terminate the Agreement not less
              than 60 days prior to the expiry date. Notwithstanding such
              termination, products or services already committed to customers,
              in contract or proposal form, will be honoured for compensation
              purposes.

2. COMMISSION RATE:

              The commssion rate will be five (5%) percent of the gross revenue
              in excess of $2,000,000.00 U.S. (to GDTI - ???????). The Telinks
              commission will be paid within fifteen (15) days upon GDTI's
              receipt of customer's invoiced payment. Telinks has the option to
              receive their commission payment in cash, GDTI common stock at
              then current market value or a combination of the two. For the
              first $2,000,000.00 U.S. ,Telinks can purchase 200,000 GDTI
              warrants at an exercise price of U.S.$2.00. The warrant period is
              from September 17, 2003 to September 16, 2005.

3. This Alliance Partner Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Virginia applicable therein.


FOR GUARDIAN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC:    FOR TELINKS CANADA, INC:


/S/ ROBERT A. DISHAW                              /S/ STEPHEN MENEZES
---------------------------                       ----------------------

ROBERT A. DISHAW - PRESIDENT                      STEPHEN MENEZES - PRESIDENT
     (Name & Title)                                       (Name & Title)


SEPTEMBER 18, 2003                                SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
     (Date)                                               (Date)
#### § 20.1408 Rule 1408. Special rules for simultaneously contested claims.

In the case of a motion under this subpart to revise a final Board decision in a simultaneously contested claim, as that term is used in Rule 3(l) (§ 20.3(l) of this part), a copy of such motion shall, to the extent practicable, be sent to all other contesting parties. Other parties have a period of 30 days from the date of mailing of the copy of the motion to file a brief or argument in answer. The date of mailing of the copy will be presumed to be the same as the date of the letter which accompanies the copy. Notices in simultaneously contested claims will be forwarded to the last address of record of the parties concerned and such action will constitute sufficient evidence of notice.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 193, Jan. 18, 2019]
Exhibit 32



                           COGENCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                             Chief Executive Officer
                           And Chief Financial Officer

     To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007, containing financial statements for the period then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco
International, Inc. for the periods presented.


November 7, 2007


/s/ David W. Brenman
--------------------
David W. Brenman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 64a.104 What requirements are imposed upon grantees? Recipients of training grants under section 303 of the Act that provide a clinical traineeship to any individual must: ( a ) Give each such individual written notice of the service payback and recovery requirements of this part at the time the individual becomes a candidate for the traineeship;
( b ) Before awarding a clinical traineeship, conduct an entrance interview with the individual in order to explain and emphasize the service obligation the individual is incurring, obtain the individual's written assurance that he or she will satisfy the requirements of § 64a.105, and document, in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section, the entrance interview on the form containing the individual's written assurance.
( c ) At the time of termination of the clinical traineeship, ( 1 ) Notify the Secretary in writing of the date on which the individual's traineeship is terminated;
( 2 ) Conduct an exit interview with the individual to remind the trainee of the service obligation, to fully explain the consequences that will incur should the trainee fail to satisfy the obligation, and, to tell the individual that the Secretary has been notified of the date of termination of the traineeship; and
( 3 ) Document, in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section, the exit interview on the form notifying the Secretary of the termination of the traineeship.
( d ) Document the entrance and exit interviews with at least the following information: The date of the interview, the names of the participants involved in the interview, and a statement that the interview included an explanation to the individual of the service payback requirement and the consequences of failing to fulfill the service payback requirement.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0930-0120) [46 FR 39979, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 18359, May 15, 1987]
#### § 18b.18 Complainants not parties.

A person submitting a complaint pursuant to § 18.7(b) of this chapter is not a party to the proceedings governed by this part, but may petition, after proceedings are initiated, to become an amicus curiae.
§ 21.447 VEPFS grant agreement. After an applicant is selected to receive a VEPFS grant in accordance with § 21.446, VA will draft a grant agreement to be executed by VA and the applicant. Upon execution of the VEPFS grant agreement, VA will obligate grant funds to cover the amount of the approved grant, subject to the availability of funding. The VEPFS grant agreement will provide that the recipient agrees, and will ensure that each subcontractor (if applicable) agrees, to: ( a ) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of §§ 21.440 through 21.449, 2 CFR part 200, and the applicant's VEPFS grant application;
( b ) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as VA may establish in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement for purposes of carrying out the VEPFS program in an effective and efficient manner; and
( c ) Provide additional information that VA requests with respect to: ( 1 ) Program effectiveness, as defined in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement;
( 2 ) Compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement; and
( 3 ) Criteria for evaluation, as defined in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 3119)
Order filed, October 08, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00717-CV

____________

GLOBAL NEW MILLENIUM PARTNERS, LTD., Appellant

V.

SOUTHWEST READY MIX, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-66078

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 03, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sheri Ullrich, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
§ 21.7642 Nonduplication of educational assistance. ( a ) *Payments of educational assistance shall not be duplicated.* A reservist is barred from receiving educational assistance concurrently under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 and any of the following provisions of law— ( 1 ) 38 U.S.C. 30 (Montgomery GI Bill—Active Duty);
( 2 ) 38 U.S.C. 31 (Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E));
( 3 ) 38 U.S.C. 32 (Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance);
( 4 ) 38 U.S.C. 33 (Post-9/11 GI Bill);
( 5 ) 38 U.S.C. 35 (Survivors' and Dependents' Educational Assistance);
( 6 ) 10 U.S.C. 1607 (Reserve Educational Assistance Program);
( 7 ) 10 U.S.C. 106a (Educational Assistance Test Program);
( 8 ) Section 903 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1981 (Pub. L. 96-342, 10 U.S.C. 2141 note);
( 9 ) The Hostage Relief Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-449, 5 U.S.C. 5561 note); or
( 10 ) The Omnibus Diplomatic Security Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-399). (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3033(a), 3241(a), 3322(a), 3681)
( b ) When paragraph (a) of this section applies, the reservist must choose which benefit he or she wishes to receive. The reservist may choose to receive benefits under another program (other than 38 U.S.C. chapter 33) at any time, but not more than once in a calendar month. The reservist may choose to receive benefits under 38 U.S.C. chapter 33 at any time, but not more than once during a certified term, quarter, or semester.
( c ) *Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps scholarship program.* Educational assistance may not be provided to a reservist receiving financial assistance under 10 U.S.C. 2107 as a member of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps scholarship program. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16134; Pub. L. 98-525)
( d ) *Nonduplication—Federal program.* Payment of educational assistance is prohibited to an otherwise eligible reservist— ( 1 ) For a unit course or courses which are being paid for entirely or partly by the Armed Forces during any period he or she is on active duty;
( 2 ) For a unit course or courses which are being paid for entirely or partly by the Department of Health and Human Services during any period that he or she is on active duty with the Public Health Service; or
( 3 ) For a unit course or courses which are being paid for entirely or partly by the United States under the Government Employees' Training Act. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3681; Pub. L. 98-525)
( e ) *Service Members Occupational Conversion and Training Act of 1992.* A reservist may not receive educational assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill—Selected Reserve program during the period for which benefits are payable under the Service Members Occupational Conversion and Training Act of 1992.
(Authority: Sec. 4492(a), Pub. L. 102-484, 106 Stat. 2765-2766)
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 9628, Mar. 7, 1991; 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996; 61 FR 29307, June 10, 1996; 74 FR 14671, Mar. 31, 2009; 87 FR 8744, Feb. 16, 2022]
41978.

#### COGGINS v. RHODES.

Jordan, Judge.

The plaintiff filed suit on July 16, 1965, in the Superior Court of Columbia County to recover damages arising out of an automobile collision which occurred in Richmond County, Ga., on September 2, 1964. The petition alleged that the defendant was a resident of North Carolina and service was perfected under the provisions of the Nonresident Motorists Act *(Code Ann. Ch.*68-8). The defendant filed a traverse to the entry of service and a plea to the jurisdiction in which he denied that he was a resident of North Carolina and alleged that he was a legal resident of Spalding County, Ga.

On the trial of the issues made by his traverse and plea, the defendant testified that he was born in Griffin, Spalding County, Ga., on July 1, 1942, and lived there until he enlisted in the Army on August 8, 1962, that while serving in the Army it was his intention to remain a legal resident of his home county; that at the time of the occurrence complained of he was stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and was on temporary assignment to Fort Gordon, Ga.; that he had purchased an automobile in North Carolina and had purchased a North Carolina license tag for the automobile; that he was operating his automobile under such tag when the collision occurred; that he was married in December of 1962 and his wife and child resided in Fort Valley, Ga., with her parents while he was in the Army; and that upon his discharge he returned to Griffin, Spalding County, Ga., and reported to his local draft board as required by law. He further testified that he had not made a tax return in Georgia and that he was not a registered voter in Spalding County, Ga., or elsewhere. The plaintiff did not introduce any evidence.

The jury found against the defendant’s traverse and plea and the defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the ver*838diet in accordance with his previous motion for a directed verdict. This motion was denied and the appeal is from that judgment. *Held:*

Argued May 4, 1966

Decided May 13, 1966

Rehearing denied June 16, 1966

*Allgood & Childs, Thomas F. Allgood,*for appellant.

*Randall Evans, Jr.,*for appellee.

The evidence demanded a finding that the defendant was a legal resident of Spalding County, Ga., when the collision occurred and suit was filed; and the fact that he was temporarily sojourning in North Carolina while on his tour of duty with the Army at such time did not make him subject to service under the Nonresident Motorists Act *(Code Ann. Ch.*68-8). *Davis v. Holt,*105 Ga. App. 125 (123 SE2d 686). The trial court erred therefore in denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and that judgment is reversed with direction that judgment be entered for the defendant.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
#### § 0.600 General.

This section describes the Core Values, Characteristics, and Customer Experience Principles that serve as internal guidelines for employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These Core Values, Characteristics, and Customer Experience Principles define VA employees, articulate what VA stands for, and underscore its moral obligation to veterans, their families, and other beneficiaries. They are intended to establish one overarching set of guidelines that apply to all VA Administrations and staff offices, confirming the values already instilled in many VA employees and enforcing their commitment to provide the best experience possible to veterans, servicemembers, their families, caregivers, and survivors.

[ 84 FR 22710, May 20, 2019]
# L_2007180EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 January 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 27 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 370 | L 30 |
| L 371 | L 45 |
| L 373 | L 121 |
| L 375 | L 70 |

OJ of 27 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 370

L 30

L 371

L 45

L 373

L 121

L 375

L 70

| OJ of 29 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 387 | L 34 |

OJ of 29 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 387

L 34

| OJ of 30 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 396 | L 136 |
| L 400 | L 54 |
| L 405 | L 29 |
| L 407 | L 44 |
| L 408 | L 47 |
| L 409 | L 36 |
| L 410 | L 40 |
| L 411 | L 27 |
| L 413 | L 50 |

OJ of 30 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 396

L 136

L 400

L 54

L 405

L 29

L 407

L 44

L 408

L 47

L 409

L 36

L 410

L 40

L 411

L 27

L 413

L 50

---