alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I HE MATT F: )

)

PE P )

)

0

V 9 P : 20

n nt Agr em 01.

On ov mb r 29.2011, Respond nt fil d a Joint Motion to Am nd Adminislrati e

mplalnt anel n nt gr m nt. Th ti n r que t pur uant to par graph' .l.a and F.l

,th gre m nt~ th I th mplaint and nl t e m nt b am n d t in Iud a Rid

pp ndi and m eli I . tion of th p nail

The Revi el pp neli substitute th original Appendix oy reelu ing 23 soure to

15 ources in Tab! A~ 1; reducing 8 sour t 4 in Tab! A-2' redu ing 22 ure 5 to 6 in Tabl

• and, redu ing 74 UI' e t 17in T bl -4. Thi amendm nl r du c th number of

•',i ting roi i 0 ure fr m 127 to 42 and th r b r du . th p n It t

nl mplat db p graph ~.l ofthe riginal dministrati e mpl'm and onsenl

greement.

Th court h r b approv the oti n 1 Am nu to include the R i' d Appendix A and

111 modification 10 par graph .1 bas don th term' t th Complajnt nd ons nl Agr mCI,t

anelfi rg elus .h wn pursuant to 40 ..R.§·2 .14c) _2.1

R p nd nt i b r l ORDERED to c mp!y ith all ofth term ofth

\ weh was ffeeti n ugu t 29 _Oll b Final rd r.

OIl.
CERTIFI ATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies thallhc original of the attached ORDER ON JOI T

MOTION TO AMEND ADMINISTRATIVE COMI'LAINT A D CONSENT

AGREEMENT in the mallcr ofQEP ENERGY COMPANY; DOCKET NO.: CM-OS20 J1-0026, was filed with the Rcgionailleuring Clerk on November 29. 20 I J.

Further, the undersigned ccrtilies thUIII Iruc and comel copy of the document was

delivered to Jim Eppers, Senior Enforcement Anomey. U... EI>A - Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop

Street. Denver. CO 80202-1129. True and correct copics of the ~lforC'll1cntioncd documents

wen:: placed inlhe United Slates nmil on November 30.21011, to;

Eric L. Dady

Vicc~Prcsident & Gcneral OliOSe!

QEP Resources, Inc.

1050 17'" Strect. Suitc 500

Dellver. Co 80265

And clllailcd to:

Elizabeth Whitsel

U. S, Environmental I)rotection Agency

Cincinnati rinancc Cellier

26 W. Martio Luther King Drive (MS-0002)

Cincinnati. Ohio 45268

Novcmb..:r 30. 20 11 01?{~<--~, nu

Tina A(l~mis

ParnlcgallRcgional Ilcaring Clerk
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2224 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and trainees, 

regardless of age or duty limitations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to expand the definition of firefighter to 

include apprentices and trainees, regardless of age or 

duty limitations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.— This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Christopher Kangas Fallen Firefighter Fairness Act’’. 

6 (b) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

7 (1) approximately 50 percent of all firefighters 

8 start out as junior firefighters; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2224 IH

1 (2) Christopher Kangas was a 14 year old full 

2 member of the Brookhaven, Pennsylvania Volunteer 

3 Fire Department who tragically died when he was 

4 hit by a car while he was responding on his bicycle 

5 to a fire alarm; and 

6 (3) because of his age, however, he is not recog7 nized under the Public Safety Officer’s Death Ben8 efit Act nor was he considered eligible to have his 

9 name added to the National Fallen Firefighter’s Me10 morial in Emmetsburg, Maryland. 

11 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF APPRENTICES AND TRAINEES IN 

12 DEFINITION OF FIREFIGHTER. 

13 Section 1204(4) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

14 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(4)) is amend15 ed by inserting ‘‘, regardless of age, status as an appren16 tice or trainee, or duty restrictions imposed because of age 

17 or status as an apprentice or trainee,’’ after ‘‘fire depart18 ment’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with 

21 respect to deaths and injuries which occur on or after May 

22 4, 2002. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### OSAGE OIL AND TRANSPORTATION INC. *v.*CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE

76-72

541 S.W. 2d 922

Opinion delivered October 4, 1976

[Rehearing denied November 8, 1976.]

*Esther M. White,*for appellant.

*James N. McCord,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The appellant, Osage Oil and Transportation, Inc., contends by this appeal that Section *44917B-4(c) of Ordinance No. 18931 of the City of Fayetteville is unconstitutional because it provides for summary removal of signs upon an *ad hoc*determination by the City’s Building Inspector that a particular sign is unlawfully maintained. In support of its contentions, appellant relies upon *McLean*v. *Fort Smith,*185 Ark. 582, 48 S.W. 2d 228 (1932). The City of Fayetteville on the other hand relies upon our decisions in *McKibbin*v. *Fort Smith,*35 Ark. 352 (1880) and *Harvey*v. *DeWoody,*18 Ark. 252 (1856), which permit summary action by a city when no factual dispute is involved.

In the trial court appellant stipulated that it did not obtain the permit required by the sign ordinance to erect its sign and that the sign otherwise violated the sign ordinance because of the size and set back restrictions in the ordinance. Since appellant readily admits that its sign as erected is in violation of the sign ordinance, we affirm the judgment upon the basis set forth in *McKibbin*v. *Fort Smith*and *Harvey*v. *DeWoody, supra,*without reaching the constitutional issue raised by appellant. This is in accord with our long standing rule that we will not pass upon constitutional questions if the litigation can be determined without doing so, *Searcy County*v. *Stephenson,*244 Ark. 54, 424 S.W. 2d 369 (1968).

Appellant also suggests that Section 17B-4(c) of Ordinance 1893 of the City of Fayetteville is ultra vires because the penalty provisions set forth in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-2829(h) are exclusive. We find no merit in this contention because Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-2831 provides:

> “This Act [§§ 19-2825 — 19-2831] shall be construed liberally. The enumeration of any object, purpose, power, manner, method, or thing shall not be deemed to exclude like or similar objects, purposes, powers, manners, methods, or things.”

Appellee has abstracted additional portions of the record and now contends that it is entitled to recover the costs thereof. We deny this request for two reasons:

> *450(1) the abstract of the appellant was sufficient to present the issue upon which it relied; and

> (2) appellee neglected to tell this court the amount of the actual costs or time spent in abstracting the additional portions of the record.

Affirmed.

We agree: Harris, C.J., and Holt and Roy, JJ.

1

We upheld the validity of this sign ordinance in *Board of Adjustment of Fayetteville*v. *Osage Oil and Transportation, Inc.,*258 Ark. 91, 522 S.W. 2d 836 (1975). Appellant erected the sign between the date of the trial court’s judgment and our reversal but no vested rights were acquired thereby.
§ 21.8022 Entry and reentry. ( a ) *Date of program entry.* VA may not enter a child into a vocational training program or provide an evaluation or any training, services, or assistance under this subpart before the date VA first receives an application for a vocational training program filed in accordance with § 21.8014. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1151 note, 1804, 1811, 1811 note, 1812, 1814)
( b ) *Reentry.* If an eligible child interrupts or ends pursuit of a vocational training program and VA subsequently allows the child to reenter the program, the date of reentrance will accord with the facts, but may not precede the date VA receives an application for the reentrance.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804, 1814, 1832)
[67 FR 72565, Dec. 6, 2002, as amended at 76 FR 4250, Jan. 25, 2011]
## Office £*$fe*j£ Canadian 

## destransports ^^^m<9 Transportation du Canada o^M>/ Agency

May 1,2012 M4820-U5-19

BY FACSIMILE
Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. DepartmentofTransportation X40, suite 6402 400 7th Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. Gretch Reference: OST 2006-24269 This letterconfirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions ofthe AirTransport 

### Agreement Between Canadaand the United States ofAmerica, signed March 12, 2007 (Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the Annexto that Agreement, are considered on the basis ofcomity and reciprocity.
Yours .sincerely 

# J/^ lerine MacDonald Manager International Agreements

cc Robert Ready, ANA Marc Rioux, ACEA. Brian Hedberg, US DoT Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0N9 Ottawa Ontario K1A 0N9 www.otc.gc.ca www.cta.gc.ca 

# Canada
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs October 7, 2008

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM GLENN WILEY

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County

No. 95-C-1918 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge

 

No. M2007-01299-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 29, 2009

 

D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., J., concurring.

I agree with the majority that, in spite of numerous misdeeds committed by the State, the

defendant is not entitled to relief. However, rules of discoveryand rules of disclosure of exculpatory

evidence exist for a reason. They are a necessary part of our notion of due process and ensure the

accused an opportunity to adequately prepare for trial. If the State violates the rules, whether

intentionally or negligently, the result, even if correct, is tarnished. As Justice Douglas aptly pointed

out over forty years ago, “[s]ociety wins not only when the guilty are convicted but when criminal

trials are fair; our system of the administration of justice suffers when any accused is treated

unfairly.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). Such is the case herein. 

The record in this case reveals suppression bythe State of a prior inconsistent statement made

by a key State witness. In addition, during the five-day trial, several discoverable documents were

delivered to the Defendant. Evidently, delayed disclosure was so commonplace that the trial court

kept count of the State’s apologies. I note, in answer to the trial court’s question about a discovery

rule violation, the assistant district attorney general said, “Judge . . . I thought the reports had been

provided, they weren’t . . ..” The report in question is noticeably absent from the State’s formal

response to the discovery motion filed with the court. 

In light of the strength of the State’s evidence at trial, I agree that timely disclosure of the

documents and statement in question would not have altered the result. The presence of unidentified

fingerprints at the scene of the crime does not change the fact that the Defendant’s fingerprints are

on the murder weapon. Likewise, the Defendant’s girlfriend’s initial denial of knowledge

concerning the murder does not change the fact that the Defendant admitted hitting the victim in the

head with a vodka bottle and taking his money. It is the strength of the State’s proof that led to the

majority’s holding that the cumulative effect of the errors does not require reversal of the verdict. 

Again, I agree. If the State’s proof was less convincing, I would conclude that the cumulative effect
of the numerous harmless errors requires reversal. As the trial court admonished the State, “This is

not a way to conduct a serious felony trial.” 

 

D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., JUDGE
#### § 6.1 Misstatement of age.

If the age of the insured under a United States Government life insurance policy has been understated, the amount of the insurance payable under the policy shall be such exact amount as the premium paid would have purchased at the correct age; if overstated, the excess of premiums paid shall be refunded without interest. Guaranteed surrender and loan values will be modified accordingly. The age of the insured will be admitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs at any time upon satisfactory proof.

[13 FR 7089, Nov. 27, 1948. Redesignated at 61 FR 29024, June 7, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      3,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,631
<PP&E>                                          11,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,170)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,604
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,429
<SALES>                                          1,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,772
<CGS>                                            1,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (594)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,077)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,914)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133048 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan LORI BENSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133048 COA: 271094 WCAC: 05-000126 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and

DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Medical Imaging Study Section, October 5, 2009, 8 a.m. to October 5, 2009, 4 p.m., Four Points by Sheraton Washington DC Downtown, 1201 K Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20005 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 16, 2009, 74 FR 47589-47592.                

The meeting will be held October 4, 2009, 7 p.m. to October 5, 2009, 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 18, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23068 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
42075.

#### HOLLAND v. THE STATE.

Argued June 8, 1966

Decided June 16, 1966.

*C. C. Perkins,*for appellant.

*Wright Lipford, Solicitor General,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted for assault with intent to murder and convicted of assault and battery. The sole enumeration of error complains that the trial court erred in overruling a motion for mistrial after the mother of the prosecutor interrupted the argument of counsel for the defendant to the jury by making the following or similar remarks in the presence of the jury: “That’s a lie, you know it’s a lie.” The record does not disclose the action taken by the trial court although the motion for new trial does disclose that some action was taken and the jury instructed that such remarks were improper. *Held:*

Where demonstrations occur during the course of a trial it is generally a matter of discretion upon the part of the trial court as to whether the grant of a motion for mistrial is necessary to insure the defendant a fair trial. See *Esa v. State,*19 Ga. App. 14 (3) (90 SE 732); *Elliott v. State,*190 Ga. 803 (2) (10 SE2d 483). It is only where no action is taken, or the jury is not properly instructed, and the demonstration could result in the failure of the defendant to have a fair trial that the discretion of the trial court will be interfered with. See *Glenn v. State,*205 Ga. 32 (52 SE2d 319). In the case sub judice the amended motion for new trial discloses that the trial court did instruct the jury with reference to such outburst but fails to show the actual instructions given, and it cannot be said under such circumstances that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling the motion for mistrial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-929 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FINANCE 

Debt-for-Nature Swap 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Jakarta September 29, 2011 

with 

Schedules 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDONESIA 

 Finance: Debt-for-Nature Swap 

 Agreement signed at Jakarta September 29, 2011; 

 Entered into force September 29, 2011. 

 With schedules.
HomeAnti-Corruption and Transparency...Anti-Corruption and Transparency

# Anti-Corruption and Transparency

121 items

        -    		Development Finance	   
        -    		Law Enforcement Programs in Action	   
        -    		International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEAs)	   
        -    		Cybercrime	   
        -    		Combating Corruption and Promoting Good Governance	   
        -    		Border Security/Migrant Smuggling	   
        -    		Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism	   
        -    		De-risking	   
        -    		Investment Climate Statements	   
        -    TIAS  		Multilateral (13127) – United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, with Protocols	  December 3, 2005 

previous page1…10111213next page

Back to Top
#### § 17.127 Date of filing claims.

The date of filing any claim for payment or reimbursement of the expenses of medical care and services not previously authorized shall be the postmark date of a formal claim, or the date of any preceding telephone call, telegram, or other communication constituting an informal claim.

[39 FR 1844, Jan. 15, 1974. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
H. R. 2408 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Green Bay, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Green 

Bay, Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Milo C. Huempfner Department 

of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

to the Milo C. Huempfner Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.