alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 39.30 General requirements for a grant. ( a ) For a State or Tribal Organization to obtain a grant for the establishment, expansion, or improvement of a State or Tribal veterans cemetery: ( 1 ) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA under § 39.31(e);
( 2 ) Its project must be ranked sufficiently high on the priority list in § 39.3 for the applicable fiscal year so that funds are available for the project;
( 3 ) Its plans and specifications for the project must be approved by VA under § 39.32;
( 4 ) The State or Tribal Organization must meet the application requirements in § 39.34; and
( 5 ) Other requirements specified in §§ 39.6, 39.10, and 39.33 must be satisfied.
( b ) VA may approve under § 39.35 any application under this subpart up to the amount of the grant requested once the requirements under paragraph (a) of this section have been satisfied, provided that sufficient funds are available. In determining whether sufficient funds are available, VA shall consider the project's priority ranking, the total amount of funds available for cemetery grant awards during the applicable fiscal year, and the prospects of higher ranking projects being ready for the award of a grant before the end of the applicable fiscal year.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4474, Jan. 30, 2012]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Robert S. Kendall
-----------------------
Robert S. Kendall
Chief Executive Officer
April 21, 2006
Exhibit 32.1


                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance  Company (the  "Company") as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Christopher M. Condron
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           and Chief Executive Officer



         Date: May 11, 2007
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



### APR 2 7 ~ OFF~ OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. Russell McCallister U.S. Department

of Energy Carlsbad Field Office P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad,

NM 88221 DearMr. McCallister: The EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) hasreviewed the information provided by the Department of Energy(DOE), in an April 18,2006 letter, forwarding a supplemental

calibration report for the Waste Receiving

and Processing

(WRAP) Facility, Gamma Energy Assay (GEA) System Unit B, at Hanford. EPA previously approved this GEA Systemin August2002 (Docket No. A98-49, II-A4-25). EP A's review of the supplemental calibration report for this equipment, found the document

to be technically acceptable.During our review, EP A identified two comments on the report. Thesecomments werediscussed

on April 18,2006with you and representatives

of the Hanford Site. During that conversation, EP A and DOE agreed

that these comments

should be addressed.

On April 25, 2006you providedthe modified pages of the document. These change pages adequately

addressed

our comments. Please contact Rajani Joglekar

(202-343-9462)

or Ed Feltcom (202-343-9422) if you have any questions. Sincerely, ..::~~~:~t~~~tfJ~a)C£,'I~.,Z~~~l~ ~ Sharon White, Acting Director Center for Federal

Regulations RadiationProtection

Division

cc (Electronic Distribution): A. Holland, CBFO K. Watso~ CBFO D. Moody, CBFO

iIl"""'~I-\UnLi. i ji--."tJII.~w

Recycl8dlRecyclabie e Prlnled wiIh Vegetable 011 Bued.. 00 100% PosOInsuNf, P~ aDW18 Free Recycled Pap8f'
#### Matter of Jemime Grote.

(Supreme Court, Albany Special Term,

April, 1900.)

Incompetent persons — Findings of inquisition — Confirmation — Code C. P., — §§ 2335, 2338, 2335.

Section 2335 of the Code of Civil Procedure limits an inquiry, with respect to the competency of an alleged lunatic, to the time of the inquiry, and, therefore it is improper, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 2325 and 2328 of said Code, for the inquisition to determine that the incompetent person had conveyed her real property to her husband during incompetency, or that that condition had extended back for a period of seven months before the inquisition.

The error will not, however, prevent confirmation of the other findings, including that of incompetency at the date of the inquisition.

Motion to confirm an inquisition under a commission *de lunático*inquirendo, and for the appointment of a committee.

Smith O’Brien, for petitioner.

Winfield S. Hevenor, for Adam B. Grote.

Chester, J.

The inquisition returned by the commissioner and jurors and the verdict of the jurors show that they have found that Jemime Grote was incompetent by reason of unsound mind and weakened understanding to care for herself or manage her property, not only at the time of the inquiry, but also that said infirmity dates back at least seven months prior to the inquiry, and that during that time she had conveyed her real estate to her husband, Adam B. Grote.

While section 2325 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizes an allegation in the petition that the alleged 'incompetent person had conveyed her property during her incompetency, as well as allegations to whom, for what value and for what consideration, and section 2328 provides for an inquiry into the matters set forth in the petition, yet section 2335 expressly limits the inquiry upon the question of ineompeteney to the time of the inquiry. For this reason, notwithstanding there was ample testimony to support all the findings made, it was improper to determine that the alleged *100incompetent person had conveyed her property while incompetent, or that her incompetency extended hack for a period of seven months prior to the inquisition. Matter of Demelt, 27 Hun, 480.

The error, however, will not prevent confirmation of the other findings, including the finding of incompetency at the date of the inquisition. Matter of Cook, 6 N. Y. Supp. 720. To this extent the inquisition should be confirmed and a committee appointed.

The attorney for the petitioner may prepare an order of confirmation as above indicated and for the appointment of the petitioner, Maria Van Arnam—the daughter of Mrs. Grote — as committee of her person and estate, and submit it for settlement upon a two days’ notice, at which time the amount of the bond will be fixed and the question of costs determined.

Ordered accordingly.
# Official Journal C 505A/15 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 505A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6415 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 505A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6415 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2021/C 505 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/268/S – Director (Function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Security and Safety – Directorate for Safety, Access and Assistance | 1 |
| 2021/C 505 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/269/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Security and Safety – Directorate for Technologies and Information | 6 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2021/C 505 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/268/S – Director (Function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Security and Safety – Directorate for Safety, Access and Assistance

1

2021/C 505 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/269/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Security and Safety – Directorate for Technologies and Information

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS LEE MOODY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-99-66; CA-03-379-2)

Submitted: June 9, 2004 Decided: June 30, 2004

 

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lyons Taliaferro, Jr., RABINOWITZ, RAFAL, SWARTZ,

TALIAFERRO & GILBERT, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant.

Janet S. Reincke, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lee Moody, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Moody has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 21.194 “Employment services” status. ( a ) *Purpose.* The status *employment services* serves to: ( 1 ) Identify veterans who are being furnished employment services; and
( 2 ) Assure that these veterans receive necessary services in a timely manner.
( b ) *Assignment to employment services* status. A veteran's case may be assigned or reassigned to *employment services* status under the provisions of §§ 21.84, 21.88, and 21.94.
( c ) *Continuation in employment services* status. A case will remain in *employment services* status for the period specified in the IEAP, subject to the limitations specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) *Termination of employment services* status. The veteran will continue in *employment services* status until the earliest of the following events occurs: ( 1 ) He or she is determined to be rehabilitated under the provisions of § 21.283; or
( 2 ) He or she is: ( i ) Employed for at least 60 days in employment that does not meet the criteria for rehabilitation contained in § 21.283, if the veteran intends to maintain this employment and declines further assistance; and
( ii ) Adjusted to the duties and responsibilities of the job.
( 3 ) Either the veteran or VA interrupts the employment services program;
( 4 ) Either the veteran or VA discontinues the employment services program;
( 5 ) He or she reaches the end of the period for which employment services have been authorized and there is no basis for extension; or
( 6 ) Service-connection for the veteran's service-connected disability is severed or he or she otherwise ceases to be eligible. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3117)


Cross References:
See §§ 21.47 Eligibility for employment assistance, 21.250 Overview of employment services, and 21.326 Authorization of employment services. [49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 58 FR 68768, Dec. 29, 1993; 84 FR 193, Jan. 18, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,527
<INVENTORY>                                     70,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,157
<PP&E>                                         649,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                 326,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,159
<BONDS>                                        354,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           676
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,586
<SALES>                                        235,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,979
<CGS>                                          203,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
§ 21.5150 State approving agencies. In administering chapter 32, title 38, United States Code, VA will apply the provisions of the following sections: ( a ) Section 21.4150 (except par. (e))—Designation;
( b ) Section 21.4151—Cooperation;
( c ) Section 21.4152—Control by agencies of the United States;
( d ) Section 21.4153—Reimbursement of expenses;
( e ) Section 21.4154—Report of activities;
( f ) Section 21.4155—Evaluations of State approving agency performance.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3670-3674, 3674A; Pub. L. 94-502, Pub. L. 100-323)
[55 FR 12483, Apr. 4, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 1526, Jan. 22, 1996]
To the United States Securities and Exchange Commission





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Cybin Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 20, 2022, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as at March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of accounting policies.























6/22/2022Chartered Professional AccountantsToronto, OntarioLaurence W. ZeifmanAssurance Partner
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1287/2005

of 4 August 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 August 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 4 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
OAR Box 1112 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

8) ll-B-2e 

Docket Number: 

A-83-22 

Printed 4/16/2008 9:12:06 AM Sheet 8 of 97 

P.1 

- • 
P.2 

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 2*> <* - - ^ 

9700 SOUTIH CASS AVENUE, ARQONNE, IlliNOis 60459 TEfEpk)NE 512/972*64 30 

April 1, 1985 

Dr. Herb Needleman 

Department of Psychiatry 

Childrens Hospital 

125 DeSota St. 

Pittsburgh, PA 15213 

Dear Herb: 

On behalf of the U.S. EPA, I would like to thank you for your willingness to participate in the lead risk assessment study. Your judgments about 

possible effects of lead on the IQ of children are critically needed. Tom 

Wallsten and I are very much looking forward to discussing these issues at our 

meeting with you on Wednesday, April 17 at 10 a.m. 

Enclosed is a copy of the latest version of our IQ protocol which will 

be the basis of our interview session with you. Should you have any questions 

before we meet, please do not hestiate to give me a call. 

Respectfully, 

Ronald G. Whitfield 

Decision and System Sciences Section 

Energy and Environmental Systems Division 

RGWrbf 

Enclosure 

U.S. DEPARTMENT of ENERQY T k UNivERsiry of CNC-AQO
June 11, 2015 

Mr. Brook Aitken 

4734 McKinley Drive 

Boulder, CO 80303 

Dear Mr. Aitken: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 29, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2009), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 196

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Pomeroy (for himself and Mr. Hulshof) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Fuels and Energy 
Independence Promotion Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CREDITS FOR ALCOHOL AND BIODIESEL USED AS A FUEL MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) Income Tax.--
            (1) Alcohol.--Section 40 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 (relating to alcohol used as a fuel) is amended by 
        striking subsection (e).
            (2) Biodiesel.--Section 40A of such Code (relating to 
        biodiesel and renewable diesel used as fuel) is amended by 
        striking subsection (g).
    (b) Excise Tax.--
            (1) Alcohol mixture used as a fuel.--Subsection (b) of 
        section 6426 of such Code (relating to alcohol fuel mixture 
        credit) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
            (2) Biodiesel mixture used as a fuel.--Subsection (c) of 
        section 6426 of such Code (relating to biodiesel mixture 
        credit) is amended by striking paragraph (6).
            (3) Alcohol and biodiesel mixtures not used for taxable 
        purposes.--Paragraph (5) of section 6427(e) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B),
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and
                    (C) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``subparagraph (D)'' and inserting 
                ``subparagraph (B)''.

SEC. 3. ETHANOL TARIFF SCHEDULE.

    Headings 9901.00.50 and 9901.00.52 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States are each amended in the effective period 
column by striking the text and inserting ``On and after the date of 
the enactment of the Renewable Fuels and Energy Independence Promotion 
Act of 2007''.
                                 <all>
```