alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cogenco International, Inc. (the Registrant) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W. Brenman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |   |  |                                                                                                 
|-- | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1 | ) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities     
|   |   |  | Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                       
|  
|(2 | ) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
|   |   |  | condition and results of operations of the Company.                                             

|          |                                                                                                                                                                           
|--------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
By: | August 14, 2009
 /s/    DAVIDW. BRENMAN
David W. BrenmanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARINE MAZAN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73527 

Agency No. A088-478-905 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 12, 2019

Pasadena, California

Before: KELLY,** PAEZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Carine Mazan, a native and citizen of France, entered the United States 

under the Visa Waiver Program. About three years after her arrival, she filed an 

application for asylum, withholding-of-removal, and withholding-of-removal 

under The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Treatment or Punishment (CAT). The Immigration Judge (IJ) found Mazan 

competent to proceed and denied her application. The Board of Immigration 

Appeals (BIA) affirmed the IJ’s denial. We deny Mazan’s petition for review.

1. After reviewing the supplemental briefs, we conclude we have 

jurisdiction over Mazan’s petition for review.1 We agree with the government that 

the referral of Mazan to an IJ for consideration of her asylum application in 

conjunction with the agency’s denial of her application is the functional equivalent 

of a final order of removal. See Bao Tai Nian v. Holder, 683 F.3d 1227, 1229–30

(9th Cir. 2012); Nicusor-Remus v. Sessions, 902 F.3d 895, 898–99 (9th Cir. 2018).

2. The IJ did not err in conducting the competency inquiry required by 

Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). The IJ noted that Mazan had 

presented an “indicia of incompetency,” and proceeded to evaluate whether Mazan

had a rational understanding of the nature and object of the proceedings. She 

reviewed Mazan’s personal and medical history and allowed Mazan a reasonable 

opportunity to consult with an attorney and examine and present relevant evidence. 

Because the IJ concluded Mazan was competent to proceed, she was not required 

to select and employ safeguards for the proceeding. Id. at 481–82. In addition, 

substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Mazan was competent.

1 Although not germane to our jurisdictional holding, we grant the government’s 

request for judicial notice, Dkt. No. 93.
3 

3. We decline to review whether Mazan was entitled to counsel under the 

Rehabilitation Act. This issue is raised only by an amicus curiae, and was not 

adopted by Mazan in her briefing. See, e.g., Russian River Watershed Prot. 

Comm. v. City of Santa Rosa, 142 F.3d 1136, 1141 (9th Cir. 1998); see also 

Artichoke Joe’s Cal. Grand Casino v. Norton, 353 F.3d 712, 719 n.10 (9th Cir. 

2003) (“In the absence of exceptional circumstances, which are not present here, 

we do not address issues raised only in an amicus brief.”).

The petition for review is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                          COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION
                             250 STEPHENSON HIGHWAY
                              TROY, MICHIGAN 48083

                                October 10, 2003

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Michael A. Mitchell
4968 Driftwood Drive
Comers Township, Michigan  48382

         RE:  AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Dear Mike:

         This letter modifies and amends your Employment Agreement with Collins
& Aikman Products Company (the "Company"), dated December 20, 2001 ("Employment
Agreement"). If the modifications and amendments described in this letter are
satisfactory to you, please indicate your acceptance by returning a signed copy
of this letter to the attention of Greg Tinnell, Senior Vice President, Human
Resources, at our Troy headquarters.

         The Employment Agreement recites an initial term that expires on
December 19, 2004. By this letter agreement, you and the Company agree that the
initial term of the Employment Agreement will be extended to the end of business
on July 31, 2005.

         The Employment Agreement will expire at the end of business on July 31,
2005, and such expiration will not be a "Constructive Termination" for purposes
of Section 6(e)(iv) of the Employment Agreement. Any employment with the Company
after July 31, 2005, will be at-will, unless you and the Company subsequently
enter into a new agreement regarding your employment after that date.

         Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended to increase your
base salary to an annual rate of $450,000.

         You will be eligible for Retirement under the Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan ("SRIP") on the earlier of (i) the date that you satisfy the
eligibility requirements for Retirement under the Plan, or (ii) in the event of
a No Cause or Constructive Termination under the Employment Agreement before the
date that you would otherwise be eligible for Retirement under the SRIP, the
date of such termination. The terms and conditions of the SRIP otherwise
continue to apply, including, without limitation, any adjustments for early

<PAGE>

Mr. Michael A. Mitchell
November 6, 2003
Page 2

commencement before age 62. The accelerated vesting described in this paragraph
would relate only to your eligibility for Retirement; it does not affect your
service credit for purposes of calculating the amount of any benefit under
Article IV of the SRIP.

         Except as modified and amended by this letter, your Employment
Agreement remains in effect in accordance with its terms.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION

                                        /S/ David Stockman
                                        ----------------------------------------

                                        David Stockman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Enclosure

/S/  Michael A. Mitchell
------------------------------------
Michael A. Mitchell

Date: October 13, 2003
41684.

#### WILLIAMS v. COMMERCIAL TIRE COMPANY.

Submitted January 10, 1966

Decided February 8, 1966.

*87*Telford, Wayne & Greer, Joe K. Telford,*for appellant.

*Stow <& Garvin, Frank B. Stow, Wendell C. Lindsey,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

Properly construed, this was an action on open account and not a suit on an unconditional contract in writing. *Gordy Tire Co. v. Bulman,*96 Ga. App. 739 (1) (101 SE2d 220). Accordingly, the defendant’s answer which denied the allegations of indebtedness and demand for payment was sufficient to set forth an issuable defense to the action and the *88trial court erred in dismissing the answer and in entering a default judgment in behalf of the plaintiff. *Jones v. Hodges,*21 Ga. App. 594 (1) (94 SE 831); *De Soto Plantation Co. v. Hammett,*111 Ga. 24 (36 SE 304); *Keiser v. American Exp. Co.,*112 Ga. App. 493 (145 SE2d 698).

While Exhibit “A” to the petition was styled a “Conditional Sale Contract and Chattel Mortgage,” it was not alleged in the petition that such contract had been executed by the parties and the instrument was not declared upon as the basis of the plaintiff’s cause of action, the petition merely alleging that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in a stated amount as more fully shown by an attached bill of particulars which is an itemized statement of account.

As held by this court in *Chatham Abattoir*&c. *Co. v. Painter Engineering Co.,*28 Ga. App. 383 (111 SE 82), “In such a suit, the contract not being declared on, its breach does not constitute the cause of action, but the contract can be used merely as evidence of the indebtedness.” Since the petition in this case did not expressly declare upon a written contract as the basis of the suit, it was not necessary for the defendant to file a sworn plea of non est factum in order to be entitled to deny the execution of the contract or claim a material alteration therein should it be introduced on the trial of this case as evidence of the indebtedness sued upon. *Howard Piano Co. v. Glover, 7*Ga. App. 548, 549 (67 SE 277).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4195

_____________________________
V ERNON S TEWART P OLK , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Escambia County

. Thomas V. Dannheisser , Judge

. January 11 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. J AY , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9. 330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Vernon Stewart Polk, pro se, Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
§ 21.400 Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary shall appoint an advisory committee to be known as the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purposes of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation, hereafter referred to as the committee, are to: ( 1 ) Assess the rehabilitation needs of service and nonservice-disabled veterans; and
( 2 ) Review the programs and activities of VA designed to meet such needs; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3121(c))
( c ) *Members.* The committee shall include: ( 1 ) Members of the general public;
( 2 ) Appropriate representation of veterans with service-connected disabilities; and
( 3 ) Persons who have distinguished themselves in the public and private sectors in the fields of rehabilitation, and employment and training programs.
( d ) *Members terms.* The Secretary shall appoint members of the committee for three-year terms. Members may be reappointed for additional three-year terms.
( e ) *Chairperson.* The Secretary will designate one of the members of the committee to chair the committee.
( f ) *Ex-officio members.* The committee shall also include ex-officio members named by the following agencies. The ex-officio members shall include one representative from: ( 1 ) The Veterans Health Services and Research Administration;
( 2 ) The Veterans Benefits Administration;
( 3 ) The Rehabilitation Services Administration and one from the National Institute for Handicapped Research of the Department of Education; and
( 4 ) The Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' Employment of the Department of Labor.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3121(a))
§ 42.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conference to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at deposition or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise any other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to find invalid Federal statutes or regulations.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
  quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
  ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
  I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and

(2) The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
  condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated result of
  operations of the Company for the periods presented.

|Dated: August
      6, 2004
|---------------------------



| |     |                           
| | --- | --------------------------
| | By: | /s/Colin
      Dunn       
| |     |                           
| |     | Colin Dunn, Vice President
| |     | of Finance                







---
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4523 Geographical limits.

Any real property purchased, constructed, or improved with the proceeds of a loan under 38 U.S.C. 3711 shall be situated in the United States, which for purposes of 38 U.S.C. Chapter 37 is here defined as the several States, Territories, and possessions, and the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: *Provided.* That no loan shall be made pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3711 unless the real property is located in one of the areas designated from time to time by the Department of Veterans Affairs as an area in which private capital is not available under 38 U.S.C. chapter 37 to eligible veterans for financing of the purchase, construction, repairs, alterations, or improvement of a farm residence or other dwelling, as the case may be.

[46 FR 43675, Aug. 31, 1981]
§ 23.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 23.225 and 23.230, and §§ 23.300 through 23.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 23.300 through .310.* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 23.300 through 23.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 23.300 through 23.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 23.300 through 23.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
HomePeople...Daniel Kimmage

# 				Daniel Kimmage			

															Acting Coordinator						Global Engagement Center												

				February 22, 2021 -									June 30, 2021							

**Daniel Kimmage's term ended on June 30, 2021.** Daniel Kimmage is currently the Acting Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center at the Department of State. In this role, Mr. Kimmage leads efforts to coordinate and synchronize U.S. government communications efforts designed to counter terrorist recruitment and state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation.Mr. Kimmage’s public service career includes serving in a number of State Department positions, including covering counterterrorism issues for the Office of Policy Planning and as the Principal Deputy Coordinator of the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications.From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Kimmage was an independent consultant and Senior Fellow at the Homeland Security Policy Institute. Prior to that, from 2003 to 2008, he was a regional analyst at Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, where he focused on Russian and Central Asian issues.His published reports on extremist media strategies include Iraqi Insurgent Media: The War of Images and Ideas (co-author, 2007), The Al-Qaeda Media Nexus (author, 2008), and Al-Qaeda Central and the Internet (author, 2010). He has also written extensively on Russian politics, including the chapter Selective Capitalism and Kleptocracy in the collection Undermining Democracy: 21st Century Authoritarians (2009).Mr. Kimmage received his undergraduate education at the State University of New York at Binghamton, and earned an M.A. in Russian and Islamic history from Cornell University. He is fluent in Russian and Arabic.
Tags
Global Engagement CenterState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 24, 2021 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2021-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2022, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2022.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
§ 18.534 Information requirements. Each recipient shall: ( a ) Make available upon request to VA information necessary to determine whether the recipient is complying with the Act and these regulations.
( b ) Permit reasonable access by VA to the books, records, accounts, and other recipient facilities and sources of information to the extent necessary to determine whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act and these regulations.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6107)
§ 21.152 Interpreter service for the hearing impaired. ( a ) *General.* The main purpose of interpreter service for the hearing impaired is to facilitate instructor-student communication. VA will provide interpreter service as necessary for the development and pursuit of a rehabilitation program. This service will be provided if: ( 1 ) A VA physician determines that: ( i ) The veteran is deaf or his or her hearing is severely impaired; and
( ii ) All appropriate services and aids have been furnished to improve the veteran's residual hearing; or
( 2 ) A VA physician determines that the veteran: ( i ) Can benefit from language and speech training; and
( ii ) Agrees to undertake language and speech training.
( b ) *Periods during which interpreter service may be provided.* Interpreter service may be furnished during: ( 1 ) Initial evaluation or reevaluation;
( 2 ) Extended evaluation;
( 3 ) Rehabilitation to the point of employability;
( 4 ) Independent living services; or
( 5 ) Employment services, including the first three months of employment.
( c ) *Selecting the interpreter.* Only certified interpreters or persons meeting generally accepted standards for interpreters shall provide interpreter service. When an individual is not certified by a State or professional association, VA shall seek the assistance of a State certifying agency or a professional association in ascertaining whether the individual is qualified to serve as an interpreter. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104(a)(14))
( d ) *Relatives.* Interpreter service at VA expense may not be provided by a relative of the veteran. The term *relative* has the same meaning as under § 21.374 pertaining to the use of relatives as attendants.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3492)
#### § 10.0 Adjusted service pay entitlements.

A veteran entitled to adjusted service pay is one whose adjusted service credit does not amount to more than $50 as distinguished from a veteran whose adjusted service credit exceeds $50 and who therefore is entitled to an adjusted service certificate.