alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 158/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 158 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 497 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 158

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 497 July 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 158/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 158/2 | First-processing undertakings in the raw tobacco sector approved by the Member States | 2 |
| 2006/C 158/3 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 5 |
| 2006/C 158/4 | EU25 ethyl alcohol balance for 2005 (established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003) | 9 |
| 2006/C 158/5 | EU25 ethyl alcohol balance — correction for 2004 (established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 158/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 158/2

First-processing undertakings in the raw tobacco sector approved by the Member States

2

2006/C 158/3

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

5

2006/C 158/4

EU25 ethyl alcohol balance for 2005 (established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

9

2006/C 158/5

EU25 ethyl alcohol balance — correction for 2004 (established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(established on 15 May 2006 In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

10

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 158/6 | Preparatory Action 2006 victims of terrorists acts | 11 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 158/6

Preparatory Action 2006 victims of terrorists acts

11

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 158/7 | Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (OJ C 144, 20.6.2006) | 12 |

Corrigenda

2006/C 158/7

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (OJ C 144, 20.6.2006)

(OJ C 144, 20.6.2006)

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 158/8 | Notice | s3 |

2006/C 158/8

Notice

Notice

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### HOROWITZ v. THE UNITED STATES

March 9, 1925.

[58 C. Cls. 189; 267 U. S. 458]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*the Supreme Court deciding;

1. The United States, when sued as a contractor, can not be held liable for an obstruction to the performance of the particular contract resulting from its public and general acts as a sovereign.

2. So *helé,*where the Government, having sold silk to the claimant, did not ship it promptly, owing to an embargo placed on freight shipments of silk by the United States Railroad Administration, so that the claimant lost his opportunity to resell at a. profit.

Mr. Justice SaNeoed

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
#### §§ 4.80-4.84 [Reserved]
§ 20.4 Rule 4. Appeal systems definitions and applicability provisions. ( a ) *Appeal* — ( 1 ) *In general.* An appeal consists of a Notice of Disagreement timely filed to the Board on any issue or issues for which VA provided notice of a decision under 38 U.S.C. 5104 on or after the effective date, as defined in § 19.2(a) of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Appellant's election for review of a legacy claim or appeal in the modernized review system.* The regulations applicable to appeals are also applicable to legacy claims and appeals, as those terms are defined in §§ 3.2400(b) and 19.2(c) of this chapter, where the claimant elects the modernized review system pursuant to § 19.2(d) of this chapter, and upon the timely filing to the Board of a Notice of Disagreement.
( b ) *Applicability of parts 19 and 20* — ( 1 ) *Appeals.* Subparts C, D, E, and I of part 20 apply only to the processing and adjudication of appeals in the modernized review system.
( 2 ) *Legacy claims and appeals.* Part 19 and subparts F, G, and J of part 20 apply only to the processing and adjudication of legacy claims and appeals.
( 3 ) *Both appeals systems.* Except as otherwise provided in specific sections, subparts A, B, H, K, L, M, N, and O of part 20 apply to the processing and adjudication of both appeals and legacy claims and appeals.
(Authority: Sec. 2, Pub. L. 115-55; 131 Stat. 1105)
[84 FR 180, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### § 4.20 Analogous ratings.

When an unlisted condition is encountered it will be permissible to rate under a closely related disease or injury in which not only the functions affected, but the anatomical localization and symptomatology are closely analogous. Conjectural analogies will be avoided, as will the use of analogous ratings for conditions of doubtful diagnosis, or for those not fully supported by clinical and laboratory findings. Nor will ratings assigned to organic diseases and injuries be assigned by analogy to conditions of functional origin.
#### § 21.5705 Transfer of authority.

The Secretary of Defense delegates the authority to administer the benefit payment portion of this program to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and his or her designees. See § 21.5901.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141(b))
#### § 6.13 Policy loans.

At any time after the first policy year and upon the execution of a loan agreement satisfactory to the Secretary the United States will lend to the insured on the sole security of his/her United States Government Life Insurance policy any amount which shall not exceed 94 percent of the cash value, and any indebtedness shall be deducted from the amount advanced on such loan. The loan shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed 5 percent per annum, payable annually, and the loan may be repaid in full or in amounts of $5 or more. Failure to pay either the amount of the loan or the interest thereon shall not void the policy unless the total indebtedness shall equal or exceed the cash value thereof. When the amount of the indebtedness equals or exceeds the cash value, the policy shall cease and become void.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1944)

[48 FR 1963, Jan. 17, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2424 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to 

that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and 

amendments to that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens Protection Act 

5 of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 

7 1990 AND AMENDMENTS TO THAT ACT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (q). 

10 (b) RELATED AMENDMENTS.— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2424 IH

1 (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by 

2 striking paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesig3 nating paragraphs (28), (29), and (32) through (35) 

4 as paragraphs (25) through (30), respectively. 

5 (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘(k), 

7 or (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (k)’’; and 

8 (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesig9 nating paragraphs (5) through (7) as para10 graphs (4) through (6), respectively. 

11 (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 

12 (18 U.S.C. 921 note, 922 note; section 1702 of Pub13 lic Law 101–647; 104 Stat. 4844–4845) is repealed. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steven Kass*


Steven Kass


Chief Financial Officer





Date:  November 16, 2010


*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### § 18.531 General responsibilities.

Each VA recipient must ensure that its programs or activities are in compliance with the Act and these regulations.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6107)

[50 FR 34133, Aug. 23, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51372, Aug. 26, 2003]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2322 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the 35-mile 

drive requirement for designations of critical access hospitals to 30 miles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Mr. DAVIS of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce 

the 35-mile drive requirement for designations of critical 

access hospitals to 30 miles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 35-MILE DRIVE REQUIREMENT FOR DESIGNA4 TIONS OF CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS RE5 DUCED TO 30 MILES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the 

7 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘35-mile drive’’ and inserting ‘‘30- 

9 mile drive’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2322 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to cost reporting periods begin3 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: **Damico, Genevieve** Sent: **Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:47 AM** To: **Ogulei, David** Subject: **FW: Meeting/IEPA CPT approval** Attachments: **IEPA CPT Approval.pdf**

From: Czerniak, George Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:44 AM To: Marshall, Sarah; Damico, Genevieve Subject: FW: Meeting/IEPA CPT approval

From: Doug Harris [ mailto:doug.harris@veoliaes.com ] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:29 AM To: Czerniak, George Subject: Meeting/IEPA CPT approval



### George,

Just wanted to let you know that we appreciate Sara h and Chris meeting with Dave, Dennis and Mike Tues day. They believe a tremendous amount of progress was made an d they have a follow-up call Monday with David Ogul ei when he gets back.

I received a letter from the IEPA suggesting that they also need to approve the CPT plan. Hopefully this will not delay the overall timing of our public notice. I have at tached a copy for your review. I will copy you on our response to the

IEPA.

Finally I would like to invite you to visit our fac ility. I recognize with your schedule this might b e a lot to ask so I wanted to extend an open invitation to you. At your conve n ience, or if you happen to be in the southern part of Illinois on other business and had some time, you could just drop in.

**Doug Harris General Manager** 

**Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC 7 Mobile Ave.**  **Sauget, IL 62201 Office 618-271-2804 Ext. 101**  **Cell: 618-616-7420 Fax: 618-271-2128**  **Doug.harris@veoliaes.com www.veoliaes.com** 

**Service First. Safety Always**

**This e- mail message from Veolia Environmental Services Nor**  **th America Corp. is for the sole use of the intende d recipient**  **and may contain confidential and privileged informa tion. Any unauthorized review, use disclosure or d**  **istribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,**  **please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all**  **copies of the original message and delete same from all computers.** 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MALIK WARE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 151 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 41.208 Content of substantive and responsive motions. The general requirements for motions in contested cases are stated at § 41.121(c). ( a ) In an interference, substantive motions must: ( 1 ) Raise a threshold issue,
( 2 ) Seek to change the scope of the definition of the interfering subject matter or the correspondence of claims to the count,
( 3 ) Seek to change the benefit accorded for the count, or
( 4 ) Seek judgment on derivation or on priority.
( b ) To be sufficient, a motion must provide a showing, supported with appropriate evidence, such that, if unrebutted, it would justify the relief sought. The burden of proof is on the movant.
( c ) *Showing patentability.* ( 1 ) A party moving to add or amend a claim must show the claim is patentable.
( 2 ) A party moving to add or amend a count must show the count is patentable over prior art.
§ 38.600 Definitions. ( a ) The following definitions apply to this part: *Appropriate State official* means a State attorney general or other official with statewide responsibility for law enforcement or penal functions.
*Clear and convincing evidence* means that degree of proof which produces in the mind of the fact-finder a firm belief regarding the question at issue.
*Convicted* means a finding of guilt by a judgment or verdict or based on a plea of guilty, by a Federal or State criminal court.
*Federal capital crime* means an offense under Federal law for which a sentence of imprisonment for life or the death penalty may be imposed.
*Interment* means the burial or entombment of casketed or cremated remains, including the placement of cremated remains in a columbarium niche.
*Life imprisonment* means a sentence of a Federal or State criminal court directing confinement in a penal institution for life.
*Memorialization* means any action taken to honor the memory of a deceased individual.
*Personal representative* means a family member or other individual who has identified himself or herself to the National Cemetery Administration as the person responsible for making decisions concerning the interment of the remains of or memorialization of a deceased individual.
*State capital crime* means, under State law, the willful, deliberate, or premeditated unlawful killing of another human being for which a sentence of imprisonment for life or the death penalty may be imposed.
( b ) Other terms not defined in paragraph (a) of this section may be defined within and be applicable to other sections throughout this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2404, 2411)
[86 FR 43097, Aug. 6, 2021; 86 FR 47387, Aug. 25, 2021, as amended at 89 FR 40391, May 10, 2024]
#### § 61.19 Transfer of capital grants.

In the case of a previously awarded project that can no longer provide services and/or housing and the recipient agency has decided to withdraw or the project has been terminated for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award, VA may transfer a capital grant or non-capital grant to another eligible entity in the same geographical area without competition, in order to prevent a loss of capacity of services and housing to homeless veterans. The new entity must meet all of the requirements to which the original grantee was subject. In the case of a capital grant transfer the new grantee will only be entitled to the funding that remains from the original capital obligation and remains responsible for all commitments made by the original grantee.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2011)
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.13 Discharge to change status. ( a ) A discharge to accept appointment as a commissioned or warrant officer, or to change from a Reserve or Regular commission to accept a commission in the other component, or to reenlist is a conditional discharge if it was issued during one of the following periods: ( 1 ) World War I; prior to November 11, 1918. As to reenlistments, this subparagraph applies only to Army and National Guard. No involuntary extension or other restrictions existed on Navy enlistments.
( 2 ) World War II, the Korean conflict or the Vietnam era; prior to the date the person was eligible for discharge under the point or length of service system, or under any other criteria in effect.
( 3 ) Peacetime service; prior to the date the person was eligible for an unconditional discharge.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the entire period of service under the circumstances stated in paragraph (a) of this section constitutes one period of service and entitlement will be determined by the character of the final termination of such period of active service except that, for death pension purposes, § 3.3(b)(3) and (4) is controlling as to basic entitlement when the conditions prescribed therein are met.
( c ) Despite the fact that no unconditional discharge may have been issued, a person shall be considered to have been unconditionally discharged or released from active military, naval, air, or space service when the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The person served in the active military, naval, air, or space service for the period of time the person was obligated to serve at the time of entry into service;
( 2 ) The person was not discharged or released from such service at the time of completing that period of obligation due to an intervening enlistment or reenlistment; and
( 3 ) The person would have been eligible for a discharge or release under conditions other than dishonorable at that time except for the intervening enlistment or reenlistment.
[26 FR 1566, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 27 FR 4024, Apr. 27, 1962; 32 FR 13224, Sept. 19, 1967; 43 FR 15154, Apr. 11, 1978; 46 FR 23926, Apr. 29, 1981; 87 FR 26125, May 3, 2022]
WorldMarket and Trade Short Reports

|  | Many of the files in these links are in        Adobe Acrobat (pdf) format. Click on the icon if you need        to download the Adobe Acrobat reader. |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Newthis week:

| Feb. 1, 1999  | Calfornia Freeze Reduces U.S.        Fresh Orange Exports/World Citrus Situation      |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jan. 29, 1999 | Chinese Tobacco Production (pdf format)                                               |
| Jan. 27, 1999 | Slight FY 1998 Decline in        U.S. Horticultural Exports Is Only First in 13 Years |

Previousreports:

| Jan. 22, 1999 | Fiscal 1999 Outlook for        U.S. Forest Products Trade                                |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jan. 22, 1999 | Brazil and Argentina        Grain and Oilseed Update                                     |
| Jan. 14, 1999 | U.S.        Soybean Ending Stocks Revised Upward                                         |
| Jan. 13, 1999 | Key        Countries Push World Sunflowerseed Production To Reach        Record Levels   |
| Jan. 13, 1999 | Turkish Grain Exports Grow as TMO Moves to        Reduce Huge Stockpiles                 |
| Jan. 13, 1999 | Southeast Asia's Share of        World Cotton Imports Reaches 10-Year High (.pdf format) |
| Jan. 5, 1999  | FY        99 Fishery and Forest Product Export Forecasts                                 |
| Jan. 4, 1999  | U.S.        Exports of Frozen French Fries Continue to Rise                              |

Also Available

| Full reports | Archives | 1998 Short Features | 1997 Short Features | How to order subscriptions to FAS        circulars |
|--------------|----------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /www.fas.usda.gov">*Last modified: Monday, February 01, 1999*
  |
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. Sprow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ William R. SprowWilliam R. Sprow
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2005
 14