alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                          84,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,077
<INVENTORY>                                    211,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               516,885
<PP&E>                                         188,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 756,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,870
<BONDS>                                        207,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,056
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   756,840
<SALES>                                        308,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,268
<CGS>                                          254,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,819
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
§ 21.364 Unsatisfactory conduct and cooperation. ( a ) *General.* If VA determines that a veteran has failed to maintain satisfactory conduct or cooperation, VA may, after determining that all reasonable counseling efforts have been made and are found not reasonably likely to be effective, discontinue services and assistance to the veteran, unless the case manager determines that mitigating circumstances exist. In any case in which such services and assistance have been discontinued, VA may reinstitute such services and assistance only if the Counseling Psychologist (CP) or Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor (VRC) determines that: ( 1 ) The unsatisfactory conduct or cooperation of such veteran will not be likely to recur; and
( 2 ) The rehabilitation program which the veteran proposes to pursue (whether the same or revised) is suitable to such veteran's abilities, aptitudes, and interests.
( b ) *Unsatisfactory conduct or cooperation exists.* When the case manager determines that the veteran's conduct and/or cooperation are not in conformity with provisions of § 21.362(c), the case manager will: ( 1 ) Discuss the situation with the veteran;
( 2 ) Arrange for services, particularly counseling services, which may assist in resolving the problems which led to the veteran's unsatisfactory conduct or cooperation;
( 3 ) Interrupt the program to allow for more intense efforts, if the unsatisfactory conduct and cooperation persist. If a reasonable effort to remedy the situation is unsuccessful during the period in which the program is interrupted, the veteran's case will be discontinued and assigned to “discontinued” status unless mitigating circumstances are found. When mitigating circumstances exist the case may be continued in “interrupted” status until VA staff determines the veteran may be reentered into the same or a different program because the veteran's conduct and cooperation will be satisfactory, or if a plan has been developed, to enable the veteran to reenter and try to maintain satisfactory conduct and cooperation. Mitigating circumstances include: ( i ) The effects of the veteran's service and nonservice-connected condition;
( ii ) Family or financial problems which have led the veteran to unsatisfactory conduct or cooperation; or
( iii ) Other circumstances beyond the veteran's control.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3111)
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 81 FR 26132, May 2, 2016]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Sept-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,969,766
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,969,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,296,375
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    635,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,969,766
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              192,326
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              702,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (595,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                  379,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (215,685)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (215,685)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (6.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (6.26)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             825
<SECURITIES>                                     2,695
<RECEIVABLES>                                      548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,282
<PP&E>                                           9,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,554
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,518
<SALES>                                          1,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,899
<CGS>                                              999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7235 

IN RE: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-235-5)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 30, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., faces pending charges in the

Eastern District of North Carolina. The district court ordered

that Tucker be examined to determine his competence to stand trial.

Tucker petitions this court for writ of mandamus directing the

district court to expedite the examination and order a magnetic

resonance imaging scan. Tucker also wants the examination

conducted at a federal prison facility rather than a jail. Tucker

requests that counsel, his seventh so far in this proceeding, be

dismissed and the judge be recused.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a

drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary situations.

See Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used

as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595

F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). In light of these principles, the

relief sought by Tucker is not available through mandamus. To the

extent Tucker asserts bias by the district judge, he has not

demonstrated extrajudicial bias warranting recusal. Beard, 811

F.2d at 827.

Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus. We dispense with oral
- 3 -

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# Official Journal L 303/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 303 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5722 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 303

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5722 October 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1117/2014 of 22 October 2014 on advances of direct payments to be paid from 16 October 2014 in Latvia and Lithuania | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1117/2014 of 22 October 2014 on advances of direct payments to be paid from 16 October 2014 in Latvia and Lithuania

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.404 Derivation fee.

(a) A derivation fee set forth in § 42.15(c) must accompany the petition.

(b) No filing date will be accorded to the petition until payment is complete.
§ 40.7 Communicating with State and local officials concerning VA's programs and activities. The Secretary provides notice to directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local entities in a State of proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development if: ( a ) The State has not adopted a process under the order; or
( b ) The assistance or development involves a program or activity not selected for the State process.
This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other appropriate means, which VA in its discretion deems appropriate. (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4231(b))
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0643

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DANIEL TODD COLLINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 31, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2020

07/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0643
Exhibit 31.1
  *CERTIFICATION*
  I, Daniel Bernstein, certify that:
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bel Fuse Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 ****Date: November 5, 2004
By:
/s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of the First Annual Interagency Report on the Implementation of the Presidential Memorandum on Advancing the Human Rights of LGBTQI+ Persons Around the World

# 									Release of the First Annual Interagency Report on the Implementation of the Presidential Memorandum on Advancing the Human Rights of LGBTQI+ Persons Around the World							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 28, 2022

Today we released the first-ever public report on the U.S. government’s implementation of the 2021 Presidential Memorandum on Advancing the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Persons (LGBTQI+) Around the World.  The report details our efforts to protect and promote the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons globally over the past year.  It is my hope that this historic report inspires other governments around the world to undertake similar actions to advance the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons and to report publicly on those efforts.

Promoting and protecting the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons is a foreign policy priority for this Administration.  It remains vitally important that we address the violence and discrimination faced by LGBTQI+ persons while acknowledging the effects of the intersections of race and ethnicity, gender, disability, religion, and national origin, to name a few.  As the report demonstrates, the U.S. government advances these priorities by supporting efforts to end the criminalization of LGBTQI+ status and conduct, seeking to protect vulnerable LGBTQI+ refugees and asylum seekers, providing foreign assistance to protect the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons and advancing  non-discrimination protections, responding to human rights abuses of LGBTQI+ persons abroad, building coalitions of like-minded nations, and engaging international organizations in the fight against LGBTQI+ discrimination.  Our collective efforts drive toward the goal of ending violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, and sex characteristics.  Equality and equity build stronger societies for all.  

I recognize the deeply meaningful and noble work that LGBTQI+ human rights defenders and civil society organizations undertake as they seek to advance respect for human rights for all.  They are our partners and allies, as are the like-minded governments and multilateral institutions with which we work closely to catalyze progress. 

The report is available to the public at https://www.state.gov/lgbtqi-human-rights/.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman RightsLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 17.801 Definitions. ( a ) *Applicant:* A non-profit organization making application for a loan under this program.
( b ) *Non-profit organization:* A secular or religious organization, no part of the net earnings of which may inure to the benefit of any member, founder, contributor, or individual. The organization must include a voluntary board and must either maintain or designate an entity to maintain an accounting system which is operated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. If not named in, or approved under Title 38 U.S.C. (United States Code), Section 5902, a non-profit organization must provide VA with documentation which demonstrates approval as a non-profit organization under Internal Revenue Code, Section 501.c(3).
( c ) *Recipient:* A non-profit organization which has received a loan from VA under this program.
( d ) *Veteran:* A person who served in the active military, naval, or air service, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable.
(Authority: Sec. 8 of Pub. L. 102-54, 105 Stat 271, 38 U.S.C. 501)
§ 93.308 Notice of the results of the inquiry. ( a ) *Notice to respondent.* The institution must notify the respondent whether the inquiry found that an investigation is warranted. The notice must include a copy of the inquiry report and include a copy of or refer to this part and the institution's policies and procedures adopted under its assurance.
( b ) *Notice to complainants.* The institution may notify the complainant who made the allegation whether the inquiry found that an investigation is warranted. The institution may provide relevant portions of the report to the complainant for comment.
#### Reider Estate

*Walter A. Kieler,*for estate.

*Matthews & Matheny*and *Alfred V.*Papa, for petitioner.

December 28, 1955.

Braham, P. J.,

This proceeding was begun by a petition to strike off an election to take against the will of Joseph Reider, deceased. It was *671filed by Cornelius F. Becker as residuary legatee and devisee. The gist of the petition is an allegation that Sadie Reider, widow of the testator, who has filed a petition to take against the will, deserted testator in his lifetime and thus lost her rights as widow.

Upon the filing of the petition the court issued a rule to show cause why the prayer thereof should not be granted. Attorney for Sadie Reider appeared for her and accepted service of the rule. Subsequently he filed preliminary objections to the petition. These objections will be ruled seriatim.

First objection: It is true that a rule is not original process, Petrovich Appeal, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 138, and that the procedural device employed by the orphans’ court is not a rule but a citation. However, Mrs. Reider has appeared in the action and every end to be attained by issuing and service of a citation has been gained. The parties are now before the court. It is to be noted that respondent did not appear specially so as to challenge jurisdiction but appeared generally.

Second and third objections: The Supreme Court Orphans’ Court rules, section 3, rule 4, lay down the requirements for a petition. Among them are a concise statement of the facts and citation of the act of assembly relied upon. Petitioner’s allegation that Sadie Reider deserted her husband many years ago may pass as a concise statement of the facts but, since this case presents a problem which can be resolved only by the taking of testimony, the petition should state when she deserted her husband. The act of assembly should also be cited.

Fourth objection: The validity of an election to take against the will does not have to await distribution. This type of proceeding is specifically regulated by section 12, rule 3 of the Supreme Court Orphans’ Court Rules. An early decision as to the right of a widow to take is often necessary to an orderly dis*672tribution of an estate and the rule clearly contemplates an early decision.

Fifth and sixth objections: These objections really constitute speaking demurrers because they state facts not of record. When evidence is taken the desertion and nonsupport proceeding can be offered in evidence and given their appropriate weight.

An amended pleading should be filed by petitioner conforming to section 3, rule 4, and to section 12, rule 3, of the Supreme Court Orphans’ Court Rules. When this is answered a time can be set for hearing.