alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 61.15 Capital grants—obtaining additional information and awarding capital grants. ( a ) Each applicant who has been conditionally selected for a capital grant will be requested by VA to submit additional documentation or information as necessary, including: ( 1 ) Any additional information necessary to show that the project is feasible, including a plan from an architect, contractor, or other building professional who provides estimated costs for the proposed design;
( 2 ) Documentation showing the sources of funding for the project and firm financing commitments for the matching requirements described in § 61.16;
( 3 ) Documentation establishing site control described in § 61.17;
( 4 ) Documentation establishing compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470);
( 5 ) Information necessary for VA to ensure compliance both with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines;
( 6 ) Documentation establishing compliance with local and state zoning codes;
( 7 ) Documentation in the form of one set of design development (35 percent completion) drawings demonstrating compliance with local codes, state codes, and the current Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association.
( 8 ) Information necessary for VA to ensure compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*);
( 9 ) A site survey performed by a licensed land surveyor; and
( 10 ) Such other documentation as specified by VA in writing or verbally to the applicant to confirm or clarify information provided in the application.
( b ) Items requested under paragraph (a) of this section must be received by VA in acceptable form within the time frame established in accordance with the Notice of Fund Availability.
( c ) Following receipt of the additional information in acceptable form, VA will execute an agreement and make payments to the grant recipient in accordance with § 61.61 and other applicable provisions of this part.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0554) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2011)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49893-49894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23415]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at the University of Wisconsin, 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times:

October 25, 2009; 5 p.m.-7 p.m.
October 26, 2009; 7:30 a.m.-8 p.m.
October 27, 2009; 8 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Charles Ying, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-8428.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of 
Wisconsin.
    Agenda:

Sunday, October 25, 2009

5 p.m.-5:15 p.m.: Closed--Executive Session.
5:15 p.m.-7 p.m.: Open--Review of the Wisconsin MRSEC.

[[Page 49894]]

Monday, October 26, 2009

7:30 a.m.-8:45 a.m.: Closed--Executive Session.
8:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.: Open--Review of the Wisconsin MRSEC.
4:30 p.m.-8 p.m.: Closed--Executive Session and Dinner Meeting.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m.: Closed--Executive session.
9 a.m.-10 a.m.: Open--Review of the Wisconsin MRSEC.
10 a.m.-3 p.m.: Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review Report.

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 24, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23415 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2535 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

on the feasibility and suitability of constructing a storage 

reservoir, outlet works, and a delivery system for the 

Tule River Indian Tribe of California to provide a water 

supply for domestic, municipal, industrial, and agricultural purposes, and for other purposes. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 2535 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tule River Tribe 

5 Water Development Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Not later than 2 years after 

8 funds are appropriated for this section or the signing of 

9 a reserved water rights settlement agreement by the Tule 

10 River Tribe and other settling water users, whichever is 

11 later, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bu12 reau of Reclamation, shall complete a feasibility study to 

13 evaluate alternatives (including alternatives for a phase I 

14 reservoir storage of an amount of water not to exceed 

15 5,000 acre feet) for a domestic, commercial, municipal, in16 dustrial, and irrigation water supply for the Tule River 

17 Tribe of the Tule River Reservation. 

18 (b) REPORT.—Upon completion of the study con19 ducted under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior 

20 shall transmit the study to the Committee on Natural Re21 sources of the House of Representatives and the Com22 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Com23 mittee on Indian Affairs of the Senate. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

HR 2535 RFS 

1 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

2 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Inte3 rior $3,000,000 to carry out this section. 

4 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS FOR FUTURE PROJECTS. 

5 No project conducted in relation to the feasibility 

6 study conducted under section 2 shall provide water sup7 plies for the proposed Tribal casino to be located in prox8 imity to California Highway 190 near Lake Success, or 

9 any other Tribal casino, except— 

10 (1) the casino in its current form and dimen11 sions operated by the Tribe on the Tule River Res12 ervation; and 

13 (2) any lodging, dining, entertainment, meeting 

14 space, parking, or other similar facilities which may 

15 be constructed in the future in support of current 

16 on-Reservation gaming activities, or in support of 

17 any future expansion of on-Reservation gaming ac18 tivities. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
### Comments on NPDES Drafts

Caton, William

to:

Jennifer Chan, Virginia Garelick, Jack Faulk

12/04/2009 02:22 PM

Cc:

"Schardt, Jeffrey", "Coram, Phil", "Potts, Elsa", "Drew, Richard" , "'Dwinell, Steve'", "'Howard,

Dennis'", "'Daiker, Dave'"

Show Details

History: This message has been forwarded.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) is the lead agency in Florida responsible for

directing the control, eradication, and regulation of noxious aquatic weeds. The FWC implements this

responsibility through a funding program for the management of aquatic plants in publically accessible water

bodies and a permitting program for activities that do not qualify for state funding. NPDES requirements could

have a significant impact on the operations of this program. Therefore, we greatly appreciate the opportunity to

participate in the NPDES PGP process. Attached are comments on: BATs; feasibility and cost estimates; and

reporting requirements.

If this information needs to be sent to others in EPA please forward it to them. If you have any questions or

need additional information, please contact me.

Regards,



### William E. Cat on, Section Leader

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Division of Habitat a nd Species Conservation

Invasive Plant Management Section

3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 705

Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000

bill.caton@myfwc.com

850-245-2809

Fax: 850-245-2834 Page 1 of 1

5/11/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web4282.htm
Exhibit 32.1
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
  ****Date: November 5, 2004
By:
/s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer
EX-4.e



 THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

ENDORSEMENT 

Notwithstanding any provision in the Contract or Certificate (“Contract”) to the contrary, this Endorsement becomes a part of the
Contract to which it is attached. Should any provision in this Endorsement conflict with the Contract, the provisions of this Endorsement will prevail. 

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein this Endorsement provides additional information to the Owner if the Contract was
purchased in connection with the Premium Plus Program. 
  

	1.	 For purposes of this Endorsement, the following definitions apply. Terms not defined in this Endorsement shall have the same meaning as defined in
the Contract. 


 ELIGIBLE PERSON 

Individuals named as Participants or Owners (“Owners”) of the Contract who are: (1) employees
of the Company or Our affiliates; (2) appointed agents, registered representatives and employees of broker-dealers that sell Our variable annuity contracts or the variable annuity contracts of Our affiliates; (3) trustees of mutual funds
offered in Our or Our affiliate’s variable annuity contracts; and (4) the immediate family members of set forth in (1), (2) and (3). 

IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS 

The spouse, child, parent, parent-in-law, brother, brother-in-law, sister or sister-in-law of an individual
identified in items (1), (2) and (3) of the definition of Eligible Person, or such other family member as We may approve. 

YOU, YOUR 

The Eligible Person(s) under this Endorsement. 
  

	2.	 The following paragraph is added to the PURCHASE PAYMENT PROVISIONS of the Contract: 



We will credit an additional amount to Contracts sold to an Eligible Person. The additional amount credited
to a Contract sold to one of the above individuals will generally equal the commission payable on the Initial Purchase Payment of the Contract. If any subsequent Purchase Payments are received under the Contract, an additional amount generally equal
to the commission payable on any subsequent Purchase Payments received will be credited to the Contract. 

  

					
	VE-6245 (11/14)		1		









 If, after purchasing the Contract to which this Endorsement is
part, You choose to exercise Your Right to Examine shown on page 1 of the Contract, the amount refunded to You will not include the additional amount credited as the result of this program. 

This Endorsement is signed by the Company to be effective on the later of the Contract Effective Date
or                                        
                                         
          . 
 THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

 
 



 

  

					
	VE-6245 (11/14)		2
# Official Journal C 118I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 118I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6514 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 118I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6514 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 118 I/01 | Notice for the attention of KHATIBA AL-TAWHID WAL-JIHAD (KTJ), whose name was added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/413 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2022/C 118 I/01

Notice for the attention of KHATIBA AL-TAWHID WAL-JIHAD (KTJ), whose name was added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/413

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
HomeRemarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security...Remarks on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540

# 									Remarks on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540							

Remarks

Ambassador Bonnie Denise Jenkins, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

Virtual

May 23, 2022

***Transcript follows***

Hello. I am Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Bonnie Jenkins.

I’d like to say a few words to you today about a very important document that the United Nations Security Council adopted in 2004, known as UN Security Council Resolution 1540. In the aftermath of September 11, Security Council Resolution 1540 – also known as “Resolution 1540” — required that all the countries of the world take steps to protect against the very serious threats of terrorists, or any other non-state actors, acquiring and potentially using weapons of mass destruction.

To accomplish this, Resolution 1540 requires that all countries pass laws to prevent terrorists and other non-state actors from accessing weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, and related materials and know-how.  And let’s be clear, by non-state actors, I don’t only mean terrorists.  Resolution 1540 is designed to prevent any individuals, groups, or even private companies from posing potential WMD proliferation risks, even unintentionally.  Resolution 1540 aims to prevent those who intend harm from being able to get their hands on or even worse, use weapons capable of killing large numbers of innocent people.

To understand the importance of Resolution 1540, just look at the latest heart wrenching headlines out of Ukraine.  Russia’s unprovoked, unjustifiable war of choice in Ukraine has only underscored the vital importance of Resolution 1540 by putting a spotlight on the vulnerability of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons, facilities, and related materials.

In the coming months, the UN Security Council’s 1540 Committee will meet to review the progress made in preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction to non-state actors.  The Committee will also take stock of the current WMD threat environment as it relates to potential non-state proliferators.

The 1540 Committee and its group of independent technical experts must be empowered to help governments that are undertaking efforts to prevent WMD proliferation.  We look forward to the Committee completing a strong review that will allow the Security Council to best tailor its future work on this vital issue.  The 1540 Committee and the Security Council can count on the full support and engagement of the United States as we all complete this work together.

UN Security Council Resolution 1540 is imperative for keeping us, the entire world, safe from weapons of mass destruction.  And that depends on every country doing its part.

Thank you.

 

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationNonproliferationRussiaUkraineUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International SecurityUnited NationsWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
#### Osba T. SHERRELL et al *v.*A. A. BYRAM

76-409

545 S.W. 2d 603

January 24, 1977

*Ponder & Lingo*and *Murphy & Blair,*for appellants.

*John C. Gregg,*for appellee.

PER CURIAM

The Clerk’s refusal to file this appeal raises the issue of how to calculate the seven months limitation in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.1 (Supp. 1975) for docketing appeals when a motion for new trial has been properly filed and acted upon pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2106.3, § 27-2106.4 and § 27-2106.5. The record shows that the trial court announced its decision on February 24, 1976 and entered a decree thereon on April 6, 1976. The petitioner here, however, filed a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence on March 31, 1976, and on April 29, 1976 the trial court by order set the hearing for May 21, 1976. Following the taking of additional evidence on May 21st, the trial court formally denied the motion for new trial on June 2, 1976. On that same day petitioners filed their notice of appeal from the decree of April 6, 1976 and the order denying the motion for new trial. Thereafter, the trial court properly granted an additional extension of time for the preparation of the transcript. When the record was presented to the Supreme Court Clerk for filing, the Clerk refused to file the record because more than seven months had elapsed from the time the original decree was entered on April 6, 1976.

As pointed out in *St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.*v. *Farrell,*241 Ark. 707, 409 S.W. 2d 341 (1966), the provisions of Ark. *909Stat. Ann. § 27-2106.3 through § 27-2106.6 (Supp. 1975), were enacted to remedy an awkward situation created by Act 555 of 1953 with reference to motions for new trial. While that case only involved the time for filing of the notice of appeal it also demonstrates the awkward situation that would be created by calculating the seven months from the date of the entry of the original decree as the Clerk has done here — *i.e. a*trial court by holding a motion for new trial under advisement for more than seven months could thwart an appeal on any matter except that involved in the motion before the court notwithstanding the fact that the complaining party’s time for giving notice of appeal had not expired. When we consider the practical effect of giving a party ten days from the denial of a motion for new trial in which to file a notice of appeal, we must conclude that the seven months limitation in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.1 (Supp. 1975), must be calculated from the date of an order denying a properly filed and presented motion for new trial pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2106.3 through § 27-2106.5 (Supp. 1975).

It follows that the petition for Rule on Clerk to file the record in this case must be granted.
§ 38.770 Recovery of funds by VA. ( a ) *Recovery of funds.* VA may recover from the grantee any funds that are not used in accordance with a grant agreement. If VA decides to recover such funds, VA will issue to the grantee a notice of intent to recover grant funds, and the grantee will then have 30 days to return the grant funds or submit documentation demonstrating why the grant funds should not be returned. After review of all submitted documentation, VA will determine whether action will be taken to recover the grant funds.
( b ) *Prohibition of additional VLGP payments.* When VA makes a final decision to recover grant funds from the grantee, VA must stop further payments of grant funds under this part until the grant funds are recovered and the condition that led to the decision to recover grant funds has been resolved.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129139 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129139 COA: 259063 Wayne CC: 98-013581 MICHAEL PAUL TUDOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
§ 17.112 Services or ceremonies on Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or center reservations. ( a ) Services or ceremonies on Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or center reservations are subject to the following limitations: ( 1 ) All activities must be conducted with proper decorum, and not interfere with the care and treatment of patients. Organizations must provide assurance that their members will obey all rules in effect at the hospital or center involved, and act in a dignified and proper manner;
( 2 ) Partisan activities are inappropriate and all activities must be nonpartisan in nature. An activity will be considered partisan and therefore inappropriate if it includes commentary in support of, or in opposition to, or attempts to influence, any current policy of the Government of the United States or any State of the United States. If the activity is closely related to partisan activities being conducted outside the hospital or center reservations, it will be considered partisan and therefore inappropriate.
( b ) Requests for permission to hold services or ceremonies will be addressed to the Secretary, or the Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or center involved. Such applications will describe the proposed activity in sufficient detail to enable a determination as to whether it meets the standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. If permission is granted, the Director of the hospital or center involved will assign an appropriate time, and render assistance where appropriate. No organization will be given exclusive permission to use the hospital or center reservation on any particular occasion. Where several requests are received for separate activities, the Director will schedule each so as to avoid overlapping or interference, or require appropriate modifications in the scope or timing of the activity.
[35 FR 2389, Feb. 3, 1970. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996, and further redesignated at 67 FR 35040, May 17, 2002]