alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO Bridgecrest Credit Company OFFICERS CERTIFICATE The
undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit Company (the Servicer), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit
Company, and certifies that:  1.
I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period June 24, 2021 through December 31,
2021 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and  2.
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has
substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is
delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021-P2 Servicing Agreement dated as of June 24, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust
2021-P2, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This certificate is dated as of December 31, 2021.  By:

/s/ Daniel GaudreauDaniel GaudreauChief Financial Officer
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cogenco International, Inc. (the Registrant) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W. Brenman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

|      |                                                              
|----- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 20, 2009                                            
|By:   | /s/  DAVID W. BRENMAN                                        
|      |                                                              
|      | David W. Brenman                                             
|      | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer          
|      | (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antoni o, Texas

July 16, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00126

- CV

IN RE NEWPORT CLASSIC HOMES, L.P. L.L.C.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice 2

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Real Party in Interest ’ s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response is

hereby GRANTED . Time is extended to July 26, 2018.

It is so ORDERED on July 16, 2018

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CI

- 02113, styled Rafael Lagunes v. Newport Classic Homes, L.P.,

LLC., et al. , pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Rosie Alvarado

signed the order at issue in this proceedin g.
#### § 10.50 Section 601 and section 603 payments made on first day of calendar quarter.

Cash payments and the first installment of installment payments authorized in sections 601 and 603, respectively of title VI of the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, as amended, will be made as of the first day of the calendar quarter following the finding by the director that the applicant is a dependent entitled to the benefits of the act, but in no case shall any such payments be made before March 1, 1925: *Provided, however,* That payments authorized by section 608 of title VI of the Act, as amended, shall be paid in a lump sum to the preferred dependent without reference to payments under section 603 of title VI of the Act, as amended.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Illini Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the hereof (the “Report”), I George A.Rosenbaum, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ George  A. Rosenbaum, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |
| George A.  Rosenbaum, Jr.          |
| Chief  Financial Officer           |
| August 13,  2002                   |

 

----
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2021 Fiscal Transparency Report…Turkmenistan

# 					2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Turkmenistan			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan

During the review period, the government published aggregate revenue data online in its state-run newspaper, but budget documents and information on debt obligations were not made public, including for state-owned enterprises.  Publicly available budget information was not complete and did not include government revenues from natural resources.  Information on the government’s off-budget stabilization fund was not publicly available.  Given the lack of availability of budget documents, the budget’s reliability cannot be assessed.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not make its reports publicly available despite purportedly reviewing the government’s financial statements.  The laws and regulations for allocating licenses and contracts for natural resource extraction did not fully detail the conditions and procedures for issuing licenses and contracts.  Therefore, it was unclear if the laws and regulations were followed in practice.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was not always publicly available.  The sovereign wealth fund did not disclose its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals. Turkmenistan’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- making budget documents publicly available within a reasonable period of time;
- making information on debt obligations, including for state-owned enterprises, publicly available within a reasonable period of time;
- ensuring budget documents are substantially complete and reliable;
- ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence;
- making supreme audit institution reports publicly available;
- fully outlining the criteria and procedures for allocating natural resource extraction licenses and contracts in law or regulation;
- following applicable natural resource extraction laws and regulations in practice;
- making basic information on natural resource extraction awards publicly available; and
- disclosing the wealth fund’s source of funding and general approach to withdrawals.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Turkmenistan 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentTurkmenistan

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# L_2004171EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

A special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union containing the texts of the Acts of the institutions and of the European Central Bank adopted before accession will be published in the Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene languages. The volumes of this edition will be issued gradually between 1 May and the end of 2004.

Official Journal of the European Union

Pending publication, the electronic version of the texts is available on EUR-Lex.

The EUR-Lex site is at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/accession.html

---
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Garry  L.  Anselmo,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. for the period ended February
28,  2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  that  the information contained in the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.


By:

     Garry  L.  Anselmo
Name:
     Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
Title:
Date:
     April  14,  2003
Exhibit 10.16

Essential Innovations Technology Corp.
Through Essential Innovations Corporation (Canada)


Stevan Perry


Position -        V.P. Systems Integration

                  Essential Innovations Technology Corp. & Essential Innovations
                  Corporation (Canada)

Term -            August 1, 2003 to July 31, 2005; automatic 1 year renewal at
                  July 31, 2004 (extending contract to July 31, 2006) and every
                  year thereafter unless Company advises that contract will not
                  be renewed; at time of automatic 1 year renewal July 31, 2004,
                  if appropriate funding is available, the salary may be
                  re-negotiated for the third year extension,

Basic Salary:     First year                US $108,000
                  Second year               US $119,000

Salary to accrue until such time as the Company has the cash reserves to begin
to make payment in a timely manner each month; additionally, the option will be
given to convert accrued wages to shares of stock at the desire of the executive
at a pre-determined conversion price.

                  Bonus plan to be agreed upon

Options -         additional 250,000 to be issued upon entering into new
                  agreement

        -         Participation in any further option plan instigated by EITC

Benefits:

        -         vehicle + operating costs

        -         group health / dental (for self and family if applicable)

        -         any other benefits that the Company may implement for similar
                  position

        -         reimbursement of business expenses

        -         pay for professional association dues

        -         pay for required continuing professional education

        -         paid vacation of 4 weeks per year
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.659 Two parents in same parental line. The provisions of this section are applicable for periods commencing on or after January 1, 1957 in cases involving payments of death compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation, and in addition, for periods commencing on or after June 9, 1960, in cases involving payments of death pension based on death on or after that date. ( a ) If death pension, compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation is payable based on the service of one parent, an award of such benefits to or on account of a child will be made subject to any payments of these benefits made to or on account of that child over the same period of time based on the service of another parent in the same parental line.
( b ) Any reduction or discontinuance of an award to the child or to a surviving spouse will be effective the day preceding the commencing date of death pension, compensation, or dependency and indemnity compensation or, under the circumstances described in § 3.707, the commencing date of dependents' educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. ch. 35, to or on account of the child based on the service of another parent in the same parental line. Any increase to a surviving spouse or another child will be effective the commencing date of the award to the child.

Cross Reference:
Two-parent cases. See § 3.503(a)(7). Two parents in same parental line. See § 3.703. [27 FR 4917, May 25, 1962, as amended at 29 FR 9564, July 15, 1964; 41 FR 17387, Apr. 26, 1976]
#### STEFANO SANGUINETTI v. THE UNITED STATES

[55 C. Cls. 107; 264 U. S. 146]

Judgment was rendered in the court below in favor of the United States. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

A canal, constructed by the Government to improve navigation, overflowed intermittently, flooding the claimant’s land but not ousting him from his customary user, except for brief periods, or inflicting permanent injury; and it did not appear *956either Government or its offleers, or that it was attributable directly, in whole or in part, to the improvement, rather, than to natural conditions. *Held,*that no taking could be implied, and the Un'ted States was not liable *ex contractu.*

Mr. Justice Sutherland

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 18, 1924.
#### ST. LOUIS, BROWNSVILLE & MEXICO RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[59 C. Cls. 82; 268 U. S. 169]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed*in part and *reversed*in part, the Supreme Court deciding:

1. Claims presented to the Court of Claims but not pressed, in the same proceeding in which others were allowed and paid, *held*barred by Jud. Code, section 178, providing: “ The payment of the amount due by any judgment of the Court of Claims * * * shall be a full discharge to the United States of all claim and demand touching any of the matters involved in the controversy.”

*1028April *21,*1925.

a bill for transporting Army impedimenta at tariff rates, the Auditor for the War Department erroneously made a deduction, by way of counterclaim, upon the ground that part of the transportation was covered, under the railroad’s passenger tariff, by the baggage allowance of soldiers who had moved over the line at the same time as the impedimenta: *Held,*that acceptance of the amount allowed, without protest or appeal to the Comptroller of the Treasury, was not acquiescence on the part of the railroad and did not bar it from suing for the balance in the Court of Claims.

3. No action of the accounting officials can bar the right of a claimant to have the Court of Claims determine whether he is entitled to recover under a contract with the Government.

*4.*To constitute acquiescence in payment by the Government of a smaller sum than is due, something more must be shown than acceptance of the smaller sum without protest; there must have been some conduct of the creditor akin to abandonment or waiver, or from which an estoppel might arise.

5. The provision of the Dockery Act, July 31, 1894, c. 174, sections 7, 8, 28 Stat. 162, 206, 207, making acceptance of payment under the auditor’s settlement, without appeal to the comptroller, conclusive, does not prevent proceedings in the Court of Claims.

Mr. Justice BRANdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )

)

v. ) I .D. No. 1 112000553

)

OMAR MITCHELL

, )

)

Defendant. )

Date Submitted: March 2 , 202 3

Date Decided: May 9 , 202 3

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant ’s pro se Motion for Postconviction Relief 1

(“Motion”), Superior Court Criminal Rule 61

, statutory and decisional law, and the

record in this case, IT APPEARS THAT :

(1) On August 14 , 20 1 4

, Defendant pled guilty to Murder Second Degree,

three counts of Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony

(“P F DCF”), two counts of Robbery First Degree, and Possession of a

Firearm /Ammunition by a Person Prohibited (“PFBPP/PABPP”)

. 2

(2) By Order dated January 23

, 20 1 5 , effective December 1, 20 1 1

,

Defendant was sentenced to a total of 47 years of unsuspended Level V time

. 3

1 D.I. 120

. 2 D.I. 109.

3 D.I. 113. Defendant ’s sentence is as follows: for Murder Second Degree, 28 years at Level V,

suspended after 26 years at Level V for 2 years at Level IV DOC Discretion, followed by

decreasing levels of supervision; for each count of PFDCF, 3 years at Level V, for each count of

Robbery First Degree, 3 years at Level V, and for PFB PP/PABPP, 6 years at Level V . The Court2

(3) On March 2, 20 23 , Defendant filed the instant motion for

postconviction relief

. 4 In his Motion, Defendant asserts a claim of ineffective

assistance of counsel , arguing that his trial attorneys violated the Delaware Rules of

Professional Conduct by allowing him to enter a plea that was neither knowingly nor

intelligently made. 5

(4) Before addressing the merits of any claim for postconviction relief, the

Court must first determine whether any of the procedural bars under Rule 61 are

applicable. 6 A motion under this Rule may be subject to summary dismissal if it is

untimely, repetiti ve, previously adjudicated, or procedurally defaulted. 7 The issue

here is timeliness. Under Rule 61(i)(1)

, a motion must be filed no more than “one

year after the judgment of conviction is final . . .” 8 “A judgment of conviction is

final . . . 30 days after the Superior Court imposes sentence.” 9

(5) Here, the Court imposed its sentence on January 23 , 201 5

, 10 and it

became final thirty days later, on February 23 , 201 5 . Defendant filed the instant

motion on March 2 , 2023, more than five years later ; accordingly

, Defendant’s

Motion is procedurally barred as untimely.

also ordered Defendant to pay $5965.00 in restitution.

4 D.I. 120.

5 Id.

6 Younger v. State , 580 A.2d 552, 554 (Del. 1990).

7 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(1)

- (4)

. 8 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(1).

9 Super. Ct. Crim . R. 61(m).

10 D.I. 112

.3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s

Motion for Postconviction Relief is SUMMARILY DISMISSED

.

/s/ Jan R . Jurden

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

c c: Original to Prothonotary

Abigail E. Rodgers

, DAG

Omar Mitchell ( SBI# 00521134 )
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000792984
<NAME> RADVA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                       244
<INVENTORY>                                      1,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,835
<PP&E>                                           6,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,943
<BONDS>                                          2,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,842
<SALES>                                          2,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,026
<CGS>                                            1,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (56)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (56)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (56)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>