alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.8210 Supplies. ( a ) *Purpose of furnishing supplies.* VA will provide the child with the supplies that the child needs to pursue training, to obtain and maintain employment, and otherwise to achieve the goal of his or her vocational training program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( b ) *Types of supplies.* VA may provide books, tools, and other supplies and equipment that VA determines are necessary for the child's vocational training program and are required by similarly circumstanced veterans pursuing such training under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( c ) *Periods during which VA may furnish supplies.* VA may provide supplies to an eligible child receiving: ( 1 ) An initial or extended evaluation;
( 2 ) Vocational training, services, and assistance to reach the point of employability; or
( 3 ) Employment services. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
( d ) *Other rules.* The provisions of §§ 21.212 through 21.224 apply to children pursuing a vocational training program under this subpart in a comparable manner as VA provides supplies to veterans under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31, except the following portions: ( 1 ) Section 21.216(a)(3) pertaining to special modifications, including automobile adaptive equipment;
( 2 ) Section 21.220(a)(1) pertaining to advancements from the revolving fund loan;
( 3 ) Section 21.222(b)(1)(x) pertaining to discontinuance from an independent living services program.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(c), 1814)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2015

No. 04-14-00712-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.F., C.J., JR., C.J., C.J., Children,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02455

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant Daniele Amezquita’s brief was originally due on January 19, 2015. Appellant 

Amezquita filed her first request for an extension of time, requesting an additional twenty days. 

Appellant Amezquita’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this court 

no later than February 9, 2015. Absent extenuating circumstances, no further extensions will 

be given. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Administrative Rule Review Report- ARR13-060 

Legislative Service Office 

September 23, 2013 

AGENCY 

DATE SUBMITTED: 

SUBJECT: 

NATURE OF RULES: 

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: 

Department of Environmental Quality 

September 17,2013 

Chapter 3 - General Emission Standards; Chapter 4 -

State Performance Standards for Specific Existing 

Sources; Chapter 5 - National Emission Standards; 

Chapter 6 - Permitting Requirements; Chapter 8 -

Nonattainment Area Regulations; Chapter 11 

National Acid Rain Program. 

Legislative and Procedural. 

W.S. 35-ll-112(a)(i) and 35-ll-202(a). 

DETERMINATION OF PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE BASED UPON 

INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

QUALITY TO LSO: Apparently complete to date. 

SUMMARY OF RULES: These rules amend the Department of Environmental Quality, 

Wyoming Air Quality program. 

Chapter 3 (General Emission Standards) is amended to: address the treatment of excess 

emissions from stationary or portable diesel engines within the standards for particulate 

matter; and incorporate by reference an updated provision of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) related to the State Implementation Plan. 

Chapter 4 (State Performance Standards for Specific Existing Sources) is amended to: 

incorporate by reference the CFR cited within the chapter; and reflect the current 

standards and requirements mandated by the CFR for pollutants from 

hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators. 

Chapter 5 (National Emission Standards) is amended to: incorporate by reference the 

updated provisions of the CFR; revise the definition of "commenced" to conform to the 

definition within the CFR; update the hazardous air pollutants table to reflect provisions 

of the CFR. 

Chapter 6 (Permitting Requirements) is amended to: list new minor source baseline dates 

for fine particulate; revise the language for treatment of condensable particulate matter; 
clarify when the maximum allowable increment is exceeded for particular matter; and 

incorporate by reference updated provisions of the CFR. 

Chapter 8 (Nonattainment Area Regulations) is amended to: include provisions for the 

ozone nonattainment emission inventory rule; reserve several sections for future 

rulemaking; reorganize to accommodate these additions; and incorporate by reference the 

revised provisions of the CFR. 

Chapter 11 (National Acid Rain Program) is amended to incorporate by reference the 

revised provisions of the CFR. 

FINDINGS: The rules appear to be within the scope of statutory authority and legislative 

intent. 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the rules be placed on the Consent List and be 

----~a~p~p~ro=v~eccod 5y tl::ieCouncil as su5mitted-5y tlie Agency. 

TaniaH 

Staff Atto ey 

Lynda G. Cook 

Staff Attorney
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1557

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Michael Lee Gene Stapleton lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________ Submitted: August 6, 2024 Filed: August 9, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Michael Lee Gene Stapleton appeals after he pled guilty to mail fraud charges pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver and the districtcourt 1 imposed a within-Guidelines sentence and ordered restitution. His counsel has

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence and restitution order and suggesting Stapleton asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We decline to consider any claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th Cir. 2006) (stating that ineffective-assistance claims are usually best litigated in collateral proceedings where record can be properly developed). Upon careful review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the other issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of the waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). Further, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2300 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. 

LIPINSKI, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. DAVIS of 

Illinois, Ms. BEAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KIRK, Mr. WELLER of Illinois, 

Mr. COSTELLO, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

HARE, Mr. LAHOOD, and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 127 East Locust Street in 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2300 IH

1 Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
HomeKey Topics – Office of Overseas Schools...Summer Programs

# 									Summer Programs							

Office of Overseas Schools

## Summer 2024

 

----

### Leadership Seminar for Overseas Principals (LSOP)

**June 25-28, 2024**

An invitational three-day seminar to explore concepts, practices, and processes of executive leadership.  Tuition, room, and board provided.

----

### Summer Institute for International College Admissions Counselors

**June 25-28, 2024**

A four-day College Board information/professional development institute specifically for college guidance counselors in American/international schools to be held at New York University, New York, NY.  Fee supported.  Scholarships are available for OS assisted schools.
        - New Counselor Strand :  Fundamentals of university advising.
        - Experienced Counselor Strand : Refine existing college counseling.

To learn more visit www.collegeboard.org/si-intl. Questions: Email Nga-Chi Lai at nlai[at]collegeboard.org.

----

### World Digital School

**June 23-26, 2024**

Supports technology learning, growth, and practice in assisted schools by focusing on cyber security and safe online systems, innovative practices to enhance school capacity to optimize teaching and learning in any mode – virtual, hybrid, or in-person, and promoting leadership in technology at the school, regional, and global levels.

----

### American Education Reaches Out (www.projectaero.org)

**June 23-28, 2024**

Six curriculum/content and leadership strands will be held at Marymount University in Arlington, Virginia.
        - Academic Leaders Strand : For curriculum coordinators and administrators
        - AERO Workshops Strands on curriculum design and teaching content  English, World Languages, Social Studies, Mathematics, Science

Preference will be given to administrator/curriculum coordinator and teacher teams.  Tuition, room, and board provided.

----

### Directors/School Heads New to OS Schools

**July 8-9, 2024**

A two-day workshop at the US Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools, to inform and support school heads new to OS assisted schools.  Invitational with all local costs supported.

----

### Leadership Paradoxes and Possibilities Program

**July 10-13, 2024**

An OS invitational program for current school heads, using the Washington DC region as a learning laboratory to investigate the complexities and future of school leadership.  Guided by literature, contemporary leadership research and best practice, we’ll embark on these essential conversations together.

Tags

Overseas Schools

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

VINCENT J. BRANSON, § 

 § No. 273, 2014 

 Petitioner Below, § 

Appellant, § Court Below — Court of 

 § Chancery of the State of 

v. § Delaware 

 § 

DAVID BRANSON, Executor of § ROW No. 260-S 

the Estate of Dorothea Branson, § 

 § 

 Respondent Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: September 26, 2014 

Decided: December 12, 2014 

Before HOLLAND, RIDGELY and VALIHURA, Justices. 

O R D E R 

This 12th day of December 2014, the Court has considered this matter on the 

briefs of the parties and has concluded that the judgment should be affirmed on the 

basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its April 30, 2013 

bench ruling concluding that the appellant was without standing to file exceptions 

in an estate matter and in the Court of Chancery’s letter opinion and order of April 

22, 2014, assessing attorney’s fees. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely

 Justice
Exhibit 10.3

 



 

April 24, 2015

 

Owen Littman

Address of record at Cowen

 

Dear Owen:

 

This letter amendment (this “Amendment”) sets forth the mutual agreement between you and Cowen Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to amend your employment agreement, dated August 2, 2012 (your “Employment Agreement”).   This Amendment becomes effective when signed by you and the Company.

 

Specifically, your Employment Agreement is amended as follows:

 

·                                          Section 1(bb) is deleted.

 

·                                          Section 4(b) is deleted.

 

This Amendment does not amend any other terms of your Employment Agreement, all of which remain in full force and effect.   You acknowledge that this Amendment does not entitle you to terminate your employment for Good Reason under your Employment Agreement.

 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Peter A. Cohen
    
	
 
    	
Peter A. Cohen
    
	
 
    	
CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signed:
    	
/s/ Owen Littman
    	
 
    	
April 24, 2015
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Owen Littman
    	
 
    	
Date
----

            COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2006/380/CFSP

of 29 May 2006         

updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2006/231/CFSP

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 15 and 34 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

The list of persons, groups and entities to which Common Position 2001/931/CFSP applies is contained in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

Common Position 2006/231/CFSP is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 4

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2006.

For the Council

The President

M. BARTENSTEIN            

----

(1)OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 93.

(2)OJ L 82, 21.3.2006, p. 20.

----

ANNEX

List of persons, groups and entities referred to in Article 1 (1)

1.   PERSONS

2.   GROUPS AND ENTITIES

----

(1)  Persons, groups and entities marked with an * shall be the subject of Article 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP only.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4367 Requirement of construction warranty.

Each certificate of reasonable value issued by the Secretary relating to a proposed or newly constructed dwelling unit, except those covering one-family residential units in condominium housing developments or projects within the purview of §§ 36.4360 through 36.4365, shall be subject to the express condition that the builder, seller, or the real party in interest in the transaction shall deliver to the veteran constructing or purchasing such dwelling with the aid of a guaranteed or insured loan a warranty, in the form prescribed by the Secretary, that the property has been completed in substantial conformity with the plans and specifications upon which the Secretary based the valuation of the property, including any modifications thereof, or changes or variations therein, approved in writing by the Secretary, and no certificate of guaranty or insurance credit shall be issued unless a copy of such warranty duly receipted by the purchaser is submitted with the loan papers.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1), 3705)

[73 FR 6310, Feb. 1, 2008. Redesignated at 75 FR 33705, June 15, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 34319, June 16, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.380 Diseases of allergic etiology.

Diseases of allergic etiology, including bronchial asthma and urticaria, may not be disposed of routinely for compensation purposes as constitutional or developmental abnormalities. Service connection must be determined on the evidence as to existence prior to enlistment and, if so existent, a comparative study must be made of its severity at enlistment and subsequently. Increase in the degree of disability during service may not be disposed of routinely as natural progress nor as due to the inherent nature of the disease. Seasonal and other acute allergic manifestations subsiding on the absence of or removal of the allergen are generally to be regarded as acute diseases, healing without residuals. The determination as to service incurrence or aggravation must be on the whole evidentiary showing.

[26 FR 1592, Feb. 24, 1961]
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2021-1  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
§ 21.6310 Rate of pursuit. ( a ) *General requirements.* A veteran should pursue a vocational training program at a rate which is consistent with his or her ability to successfully pursue training, considering: ( 1 ) Effects of his or her disability;
( 2 ) Family responsibilities;
( 3 ) Travel;
( 4 ) Reasonable adjustment to training; and
( 5 ) Other circumstances which affect the veteran's ability to pursue training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( b ) *Continuous pursuit.* A veteran should pursue a program of vocational training with as little interruption as necessary, considering the factors described in paragraph (a) of this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( c ) *Responsibility for determining the rate of pursuit.* VR&E staff, in consultation with the veteran, will determine the rate and continuity of pursuit of training. Consultation with the medical consultant and the Vocational Rehabilitation Panel should be utilized as necessary. This determination will be made in the course of developing the plan, but may be changed later, as necessary to enable the veteran to complete his or her training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( d ) *Measurement of training time used.* The rate of pursuit shall be measured on the basis of the provisions of § 21.310 of this part. A veteran may not pursue training on a less than half-time basis as measured under § 21.310 of this part, except for brief periods, after which training must be resumed on a half-time or greater basis. Brief periods are limited to all or part of a semester, term or quarter, or up to 90 days in a course not conducted on a semester, term, or quarter basis. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1))
( e ) *Reduced work tolerance.* The provisions of § 21.312 of this part are not applicable to this temporary program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b))
( f ) *Pursuit of training under special circumstances.* The provisions of § 21.314 of this part are not applicable to this temporary program.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2))
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Celestial
Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month and
six-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to such consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of September 30,
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated November 3, 1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 1999 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.



Deloitte & Touche LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 12, 2000

                                      17