alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4211 Amortization—prepayment. ( a ) To be eligible for guaranty under 38 U.S.C. 3712 a loan shall be amortized fully within the term of the loan in accordance with any generally recognized plan of amortization requiring approximately equal monthly payments. The loan shall not be payable on demand or at sight or presentation, or at a time not specified or computable from the language in the evidence of indebtedness, or on a renewal basis at the option of the holder. The first payment may be deferred not longer than 2 months from the date the loan is closed.
( b ) No guaranteed loan security instrument shall contain any provision giving the holder a right to declare the loan due or otherwise to declare a default if the holder “shall feel insecure” or upon the occurrence of any similar condition at the holder's option, without regard to any act or omission by the debtor.
( c ) The debtor shall have the right, without penalty or fee, to prepay all or not less than one installment of the indebtedness at any time. Credit for any partial prepayment made on other than an installment due date may be postponed to the next installment due date. The holder and the debtor may agree at any time that any prepayment not previously applied in satisfaction of matured installments shall be reapplied for the purpose of curing or preventing any subsequent default. Any prepayment in full of the indebtedness (unpaid principal balance plus earned interest) shall be credited on the date received. In determining the amount required to prepay the indebtedness in full the holder of the loan shall exclude all unearned interest or discount.
( d ) Subject to paragraph (a) of this section any amounts which under the terms of a loan do not become due and payable on or before the last maturity date permissible for loans of its class under the limitations contained in § 36.4204 shall automatically fall due on such date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 5-6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223,                         *saavedrr@ninds.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 17, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22979 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### James Jacques et al., Appellants, *v.*B. Edmund David et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan.

William 0. Reddy, for appellants.

H. A. Yieu, for respondent Abbott.

Frederick Wiener, for respondent David.

*Per Curiam.*

The doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*cannot be invoked by the plaintiffs. Although the defendant David was in possession of the premises as a tenant, the obligation, nevertheless, rested upon the plaintiffs, under the lease, to keep the premises in proper repair. If the happening of the occurrence in question warrants any inference, it must be that the plaintiffs neglected their duty in failing to keep the premises in a state of repair. On the evidence, the judgment of the court below was proper and should be affirmed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebioh and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to both defendants.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1189** 

IGOR BELYAKOV , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 03656

- DKC )

Submitted : July 2 1 , 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Igor Belyakov, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Remy, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Igor Belyakov appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgement to the defendant in Belyakov’s action alleging age discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error . Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Belyakov v. Henry M.
Jackson Found. , No. 8:13

- cv - 03656

- DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on October 14, 2009 at the US Forest Service Office, 35 College 
Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Committee, established by the 
Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 14, 2009, beginning at 1 p.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 
35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.

For Further Information or to Request an Accommodation (One Week Prior 
to Meeting Date) Contact: Arla Hams, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, 
Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 
543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda: (1) 
Aquatic Invasive Species funding; (2) Southern Nevada Public Land 
Management Act (SNPLMA) Round 11 process update, (3) Environmental 
Improvement Program update, (4) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Regional 
Plan update, and (5) public comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal 
Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens 
are encouraged to attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to 
the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at 
the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the 
Committee before or after the meeting.
    Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

    Dated: September 23, 2009.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-23419 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Silverado Gold
Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending February
28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ Garry L. Anselmo       
| | ---------------------------
| | Garry L. Anselmo,          
| | Principal Executive Officer
| |                            
| | April 14, 2010             

---
§ 17.508 Access to quality assurance records and documents within the agency. ( a ) Access to confidential and privileged quality assurance records and documents within the Department pursuant to this section is restricted to VA employees (including consultants and contractors of VA) who have a need for such information to perform their government duties or contractual responsibilities and who are authorized access by the VA medical facility Director, Regional Director, the Under Secretary for Health, or their designees or by the regulations in §§ 17.500 through 17.511.
( b ) To foster continuous quality improvement, practitioners on VA rolls, whether paid or not, will have access to confidential and privileged quality assurance records and documents relating to evaluation of the care they provided.
( c ) Any quality assurance record or document, whether confidential and privileged or not, may be provided to the General Counsel or any attorney within the Office of General Counsel, wherever located. These documents may also be provided to a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney who is investigating a claim or potential claim against the VA or who is preparing for litigation involving the VA. If necessary, such a record or document may be removed from the VA medical facility to the site where the General Counsel or any attorney within the Office of General Counsel or the DOJ attorney is conducting an investigation or preparing for litigation.
( d ) Any quality assurance record or document or the information contained therein, whether confidential and privileged or not, will be provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General upon request. A written request is not required.
( e ) To the extent practicable, documents accessed under paragraph (b) of this section will not include the identity of peer reviewers. Reasonable efforts will be made to edit documents so as to protect the identities of reviewers, but the inability to completely do so will not bar access under paragraph (b).
( f ) No individual shall be permitted access to confidential and privileged quality assurance records and documents identified in § 17.501 unless such individual has been informed of the penalties for unauthorized disclosure. Any misuse of confidential and privileged quality assurance records or documents shall be reported to the appropriate VHA official, e.g., Service Chief, Medical Center Director.
( g ) In general, confidential and privileged quality assurance records and documents will be maintained for a minimum of 3 years and may be held longer if needed for research studies or quality assurance or legal purposes.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5705)
Exhibit 32

                           Cogenco International, Inc.
                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

     To my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2005, containing financial statements for the quarter then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco
International, Inc. for the periods presented.

February 13, 2006

/s/ David W. Brenman
---------------------------------------------
David W. Brenman, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 18b.61 Exceptions to rulings of presiding officer unnecessary.

Exceptions to rulings of the presiding officer are unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling of the presiding officer is sought, makes known the action which the party desires the presiding officer to take, or the party's objection to an action taken, and the party's grounds therefor.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 42.104 Content of petition. In addition to the requirements of §§ 42.6, 42.8, 42.22, and 42.24, the petition must set forth: ( a ) *Grounds for standing.* The petitioner must certify that the patent for which review is sought is available for *inter partes* review and that the petitioner is not barred or estopped from requesting an *inter partes* review challenging the patent claims on the grounds identified in the petition.
( b ) *Identification of challenge.* Provide a statement of the precise relief requested for each claim challenged. The statement must identify the following: ( 1 ) The claim;
( 2 ) The specific statutory grounds under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 on which the challenge to the claim is based and the patents or printed publications relied upon for each ground;
( 3 ) How the challenged claim is to be construed. Where the claim to be construed contains a means-plus-function or step-plus-function limitation as permitted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f), the construction of the claim must identify the specific portions of the specification that describe the structure, material, or acts corresponding to each claimed function;
( 4 ) How the construed claim is unpatentable under the statutory grounds identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The petition must specify where each element of the claim is found in the prior art patents or printed publications relied upon; and
( 5 ) The exhibit number of the supporting evidence relied upon to support the challenge and the relevance of the evidence to the challenge raised, including identifying specific portions of the evidence that support the challenge. The Board may exclude or give no weight to the evidence where a party has failed to state its relevance or to identify specific portions of the evidence that support the challenge.
( c ) A motion may be filed that seeks to correct a clerical or typographical mistake in the petition. The grant of such a motion does not change the filing date of the petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          17,139
<SECURITIES>                                    14,327
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (320)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,705
<PP&E>                                          15,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,218)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,743
<SALES>                                         26,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,307
<CGS>                                           17,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    38
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (451)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (840)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
<FN>
<F1>Interest Income
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 9A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.009.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 9A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5315 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.009.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 9A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5315 January 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 009A/01 | Vacancy for an Executive Director function (Grade AD 14) of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 009A/01

Vacancy for an Executive Director function (Grade AD 14) of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |

5

(FR)

9

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-111 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CROATIA 

Signed at Ramstein AB July 15, 2004 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CROATIA 

Defense: Cooperation 

Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Ramstein AB July 15, 2004; 

 Entered into force January 11, 2006. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
NOTE: It is noted that in the chart above, the titles "PfP SOFA" and "NATO SOFA" should be switched. 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 50246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency 
Dilute Gasoline Engine II

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 25, 2009, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute 
Gasoline Engine II (``HEDGE II''), has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Diamond Electric Corporation, Dundee, MI, 
has been added as a party to the venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE II intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 19, 2009, HEDGE II filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on April 2, 2009 (74 FR 15003).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 17, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38473).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-23402 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M