alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of New Restricted Stock Bonus Grant to Chief Executive Officer



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 New Restricted Stock Bonus Grants to Chief Executive Officer Under The Openwave Systems Inc 2001 Stock Compensation Plan 

 
 The following grant was made using the form of Restricted Stock Bonus agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 14, 2003 
  

	Participant	  	Grant Date	  	Restricted
Shares	  	Vesting Schedule
	

	 Don Listwin
	  	10/20/2003	  	20,833	  	1/36 of the shares monthly beginning on 11/20/03
§ 1.922 Exemptions. ( a ) Sections 1.900 through 1.953, to the extent they reflect remedies or procedures prescribed by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, such as administrative offset, use of credit bureaus, contracting for collection agencies, and interest and related charges, do not apply to debts arising under, or payments made under, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*), except to the extent provided under 42 U.S.C. 404 and 31 U.S.C. 3716(c); or the tariff laws of the United States. These remedies and procedures, however, may be authorized with respect to debts that are exempt from the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the DCIA of 1996, to the extent that they are authorized under some other statute or the common law.
( b ) This section should not be construed as prohibiting the use of §§ 1.900 through 1.953 when collecting debts owed by persons employed by agencies administering the laws cited in paragraph (a) of this section unless the debt arose under those laws.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)
[69 FR 62196, Oct. 25, 2004]
§ 38.735 Additional factors for deciding applications. ( a ) *Applicant's performance on prior award.* VA may consider the applicant's noncompliance with requirements applicable to prior VA or other Federal agency awards as reflected in past written evaluation reports and memoranda on performance and the completeness of required prior submissions.
( b ) *Applicant's fiscal integrity.* Applicants must meet and maintain standards of fiscal integrity for participation in Federal grant programs as reflected in 2 CFR 200.205.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.382 [Reserved]
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 6, 2010

0429 

# Order

May 6, 2010

140215

ROBERT M. MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140215 COA: 289602 Dickinson CC: 08-015152-CK FARM BUREAU GENE RAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Official Journal C 153/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 623 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 623 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 153/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2019(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 153/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2019(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 12 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 153/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2019(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 153/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2019(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-801 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and PARAGUAY 

Signed at Asuncion May 2, 2005 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
PARAGUAY 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Asuncion May 2, 2005; 

 Entered into force August 1, 2006. 

 With annexes. 















Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Spanish text of this Agreement. If the Spanish text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 11, 2009



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Date:  August  12,  2003
To:  John  Creel
From:  Steve  Meineke
Subject:  Amendment  to  Employment  Agreement  related  to  Stock  Options

This  will  memorialize an agreement between Rapidtron, Inc. and John Creel that
amends  the  Employment  Agreement  dated January 17, 2003 between Rapidtron and
John  Creel,  as amended on April 11, 2003 (the "Agreement"). Section 5.c of the
Agreement  is  amended  to extend the time for Rapidtron to adopt a stock option
plan  from  July  31,  2003,  until  no  later  than  September  15,  2003.

By  signing  below,  each  party hereby acknowledges and agrees to the foregoing
amendment.  Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall continue in
full  force  and effect and the parties hereby ratify and reaffirm the Agreement
as  modified  herein.

RAPIDTRON,  INC.



               By: /s/  Steve  Meineke
                   ---------------------------------------------
                   Steve  Meineke,  Secretary  &  Treasurer





ACKNOWLEDGED  AND  AGREED:



                   /s/  John  Creel
                   ------------------------------------------------
                   JOHN  CREEL,  an  individual


<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc.,
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William R. Sprow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                     | 
|-------------------- | 
|/s/ William R. Sprow | 

William R. Sprow
Chief Financial Officer
July 14, 2003

14
#### § 14.561 Administrative action prior to submission.

Before a submission is made to the U.S. Attorney in cases involving personnel or claims, the General Counsel, if the file is in Central Office, or the Regional Counsel at the regional office, hospital or center, if the file is in the regional office or other field facility, will first ascertain that necessary administrative or adjudicatory (forfeiture (see Pub. L. 86-222; 73 Stat. 452), etc.), action has been taken; except that in urgent cases such as breaches of the peace, disorderly conduct, trespass, robbery, or where the evidence may be lost by delay, or prosecution barred by the statute of limitations, submission to the U.S. Attorney will be made immediately.

[42 FR 41413, Aug. 17, 1977]
II 

Calendar No. 496 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2276 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 2, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 14, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Corporal Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTOPHER E. ESCKELSON POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 203 North Main Street in Vas7 sar, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cor8 poral Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2276 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Christopher 

5 E. Esckelson Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 496 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2276 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostE. Esckelson Post Office Building’’. Vassar, Michigan, as the ‘‘Corporal Christopher al Service located at 203 North Main Street in 

NOVEMBER 14, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Q12015Exhibit10.1-ExecutiveServiceAgreementAmendment




EXHIBIT 10.1




	
	
	
































AMENDMENT TWO TO THE EXECUTIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT 




Between








INC Research Holding Limited




And




Alistair MacDonald













































1









INC Research Holding Limited, River View, The Meadows Business Park, Station Approach, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB, United Kingdom (hereinafter “INC Research”)


and 


Alistair MacDonald of Little Birches, Coronation Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 9LQ (hereinafter “the Employee”)


Hereby agree as follows:


Amendment One, executed on January 20, 2015, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by this Amendment Two. 


Due to the Employee’s recent change in job title, effective 1st January 2015, the Executive Service Agreement, dated July 31, 2014, will be amended as follows:




		
	1.
	SALARY




The Employee’s salary shall be increased to £296,053.00 gross per annum subject to tax and Insurance and any other deductions required by law.  The Employee’s salary will accrue on a day-to-day basis and will be payable monthly in arrears, on or about the 25th of every month.  The Employee’s salary is paid in respect of the Employee’s duties both for the Company and any other Group Company for whom the Employee is required to work.


Please note this salary increase takes into account the annual merit increase for 2014.
  


		
	2.
	JOB TITLE




The Employee’s new title will be President and Chief Operating Officer.






All other terms and conditions of the Executive Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


	
					
	Signed on behalf of INC Research:
	 
	/s/ Christopher L. Gaenzle  
	 
	Dated: 22 April 2015

	 
	 
	Christopher L. Gaenzle
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Director
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Signed by the Employee:
	 
	/s/ Alistair Macdonald
	 
	Dated: 18 April 2015

	 
	 
	Alistair MacDonald
	 
	 






                





2
#### Meyer S. Rich, Respondent, *v.*Simon Schendel, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, seventh, district, borough of Manhattan.

William P. Schoen, for appellant.

M. Meyer, for respondent.

*Per Guriam.*

As the record does not show that the defendant was a resident of the city of New York, the jurisdictional facts do not appear, and the judgment must, accordingly, be reversed. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. Rep. 750.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerioh and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.
#### § 4.121 Identification of epilepsy.

When there is doubt as to the true nature of epileptiform attacks, neurological observation in a hospital adequate to make such a study is necessary. To warrant a rating for epilepsy, the seizures must be witnessed or verified at some time by a physician. As to frequency, competent, consistent lay testimony emphasizing convulsive and immediate post-convulsive characteristics may be accepted. The frequency of seizures should be ascertained under the ordinary conditions of life (while not hospitalized).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7141

RONALD STEVEN PHILLIP,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RANDY LEE, Warden, Caledonia Institution,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-99-243-1)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul M. Green, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

for Appellee.
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 20, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 21, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Steven Phillip appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Respondents and denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Phillip v. Lee, No. CA-99-243-1 (M.D.N.C. July 21,

2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Willie Ray #1210691

Powledge Unit

1400 F.M.3452

Palestine,Texas 75803

July 2,2015

Clerk Louise Pearson

Court Of Criminal Appeals

P.O.Box 12308,Capitol Station

Austin,Texas 78711

Re:Cause No.: 007-0396-03-B

Writ of C0RM NOBIS

Ex Parte

Willie Ray

Dear CLERK,

This is Willie Ray,my reason for writing you today

is because I would like to get a update on the status

of the'cause number stated above please.I thank you

for your attention in this matter,and may God bless

you.

cc:/file

Respectfully Yours

Willie Ray

Petitioner pro se

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 07 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 07-0011

IN THE MATTEROF CALLINGA RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE 

# FiLED AUG 1 1 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

The Honorable Heather Perry, Judge of the District Court for the Tenth Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District Judge Wm. Nels Swandal to assumejurisdiction of Petroleum County Cause No. DP-2020-06, In the Matter ofthe Estate ofCalR. Nunn. Judge Swandal has retired under the provisions ofthe Montana Judges' Retirement System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Tenth Judicial District Court with the above-listed matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active service in the District Court ofthe Tenth Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, to assumejudicial authority ofPetroleum County CauseNo. DP-2020-06,In the Matter of the Estate ofCalR. Nunn, and is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including final resolution ofsaid matter. 2. For all active service, Judge Swandal shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be reimbursed. 3. A copy ofthis Order shall be filed with the Clerk ofCourt ofthe Tenth Judicial District, Petroleum County,withtherequest that this Orderbe sent to all counsel ofrecord in the above-listed matter. 08/11/2022

Case Number: PR 07-0011

### 4. A copy ofthis Order shall also be furnished to the Honorable Heather Perry, the

Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme Court Administrator. This Order is entered by the ChiefJustice pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of the 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof.

, "1"\-N DATED this 1 I 'day ofAugust, 2022.

ChiefJustice

2
21553 RUDDER LANE, UNIT 1 P O BOX 760 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

Phone: 302

- 855

- 2355 Fax: 302

- 855

- 9738

January 8, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Washington D

. C

., 20590

Re: Request for A dditional Information for Docket FAA

- 2015

- 4463

Dear Sir or Madam :

In response to you r letter dated December 31, 2015

, following is the r equested additional information.

 My request is in the public interest because utilizing a UAV to conduct aerial photography will reduce the number of powered aircraft in the National Airspace System, thereby re ducing congestion in the NAS. Also, b ecause the UAV is electrically powered, t here will be reduced air pollution and reduced noise pollution

.

 Safety will be enhanced because the size of the UAV is significantly smaller as compared to a traditional fixed wing ai rcraft. Therefore, in the event of an accident, the damage will be substantially reduced. In addition, the DJI Phantom has several safety features integrated into the operating software, such as Re turn to Home, and geofenci ng.

 My request is similar to many other request s which have been granted. However, my request is being made by a highly experienced aviator with a long track record of safely navigating the NAS.
I have been a pilot for over 20 years, including over 10 years as a Certified Flight Instructor. I have a perfect safety record and have never been involved in an incident or accident, nor have I ever had an administrative actions taken against my certificat e.

T hank you for your prompt attention to this matter and please contact me with any further questions. I can be reached at 302

- 542

- 4251 or garrett@georgetownair.com

Sincerely,

Garrett Dernoga
Owner

, Georgetown Air Services , LLC
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 41314 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ARTURO RIOS

- PENA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 131

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Rios

- Pena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rios

- Pena h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-41314 Document: 00512704207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2014No. 13

- 41314

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-41314 Document: 00512704207 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2014