alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.360 Service-connected health-care eligibility of certain persons administratively discharged under other than honorable condition. ( a ) *General.* The health-care and related benefits authorized by chapter 17 of title 38 U.S.C. shall be provided to certain former service persons with administrative discharges under other than honorable conditions for any disability incurred or aggravated during active military, naval, or air service in line of duty.
( b ) *Discharge categorization.* With certain exceptions such benefits shall be furnished for any disability incurred or aggravated during a period of service terminated by a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Specifically, they may not be furnished for any disability incurred or aggravated during a period of service terminated by a bad conduct discharge or when one of the bars listed in § 3.12(c) applies.
( c ) *Eligibility criteria.* In making determinations of health-care eligibility the same criteria will be used as is now applicable to determinations of service incurrence and in line of duty when there is no character of discharge bar.
[43 FR 15154, Apr. 11, 1978]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4206 Underwriting standards, occupancy, and non-discrimination requirements. ( a ) Except for refinancing loans pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3712(a)(1)(F), no loan shall be guaranteed unless the terms of repayment bear a proper relationship to the veteran's present and anticipated income and expenses, and the veteran is a satisfactory credit risk, as determined by use of the standards in § 36.4337 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3712)
( b ) Use of the standards in § 36.4337 of this part for underwriting manufactured home loans will be waived only in extraordinary circumstances. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3712)
( c ) The lender responsibilities contained in § 36.4337 of this part and the certification required and penalties to be assessed under § 36.4337A of this part against lenders making false certifications also apply to lenders originating VA guaranteed manufactured home loans under the authority of 38 U.S.C. 3712. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3712)
( d ) No loan shall be guaranteed pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3712(a)(1) unless: ( 1 ) The veteran certifies, in such form as the Secretary shall prescribe, that he or she will personally occupy the property as his or her home or, if the veteran is on active duty status as a member of the Armed Forces and is for that reason unable to occupy the property, the veteran's spouse must certify that he or she will personally occupy the property as his or her home. For the purposes of this section, the words *personally occupy the property as his or her home* mean that the veteran as of the date of his or her certification actually lives in the property personally as his or her residence or actually intends upon completion of the loan and acquisition of the manufactured home to move into the home personally within a reasonable time and to utilize the home as his or her residence.
( 2 ) The veteran certifies, in such form as the Secretary shall prescribe that: ( i ) Neither the veteran, nor anyone authorized to act for the veteran, will refuse to sell or rent, after the making of a bona fide offer, or refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny the dwelling or property covered by this loan to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin;
( ii ) The veteran recognizes that any restrictive covenant on the property relating to race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin is illegal and void and any such covenant is specifically disclaimed; and
( iii ) The veteran understands that civil action for preventive relief may be brought by the Attorney General of the United States in any appropriate U.S. district court against any person responsible for a violation of the applicable law.
[46 FR 43670, Aug. 31, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 9855, Mar. 8, 1991; 58 FR 37859, July 14, 1993]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2363 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts paid on behalf of Federal employees and members of the Armed 

Forces on active duty under Federal student loan repayment programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2007 

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts paid on behalf of Federal 

employees and members of the Armed Forces on active 

duty under Federal student loan repayment programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Generating Oppor5 tunity by Forgiving Educational Debt for Service Act of 

6 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2363 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS BY 

2 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

3 (a) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME.—Section 

4 108(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

5 student loans) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(5) STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS BY FED8 ERAL GOVERNMENT.—In the case of an individual, 

9 gross income does not include any payments made 

10 by the Federal Government on behalf of such indi11 vidual under— 

12 ‘‘(A)(i) section 5379 of title 5, United 

13 States Code; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) any other similar Federal program for 

15 its employees; or 

16 ‘‘(B) section 510(e)(2), chapter 109, or 

17 chapter 1609 of title 10, United States Code.’’. 

18 (b) EXCLUSION FROM WAGES.— 

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3121(a) of such 

20 Code (defining wages) is amended— 

21 (A) in paragraph (21), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

22 the end; 

23 (B) in paragraph (22), by striking the pe24 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

25 (C) by inserting after paragraph (22) the 

26 following: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2363 IH

1 ‘‘(23) any payment excluded from gross income 

2 under section 108(f)(5) (relating to student loan re3 payments by the Federal Government).’’. 

4 (2) SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Section 209(a) of 

5 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 409(a)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(20) Any payment excluded from gross income 

8 under section 108(f)(5) of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986 (relating to student loan repayments 

10 by Federal Government).’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to payments made on or after the 

13 date of enactment of this Act in taxable years ending after 

14 such date. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### § 6.5 Conditional designation of beneficiary.

If the insured by notice in writing to the Department of Veterans Affairs during his or her lifetime has provided that a designated beneficiary shall be entitled to the proceeds of United States Government life insurance only if such beneficiary shall survive him or her for such period (not more than 30 days), as specified by the insured, no right to the insurance shall vest as to such beneficiary during that period. In the event such beneficiary fails to survive the specified period, payment of the proceeds of United States Government life insurance will be made as if the beneficiary had predeceased the insured.

[14 FR 7175, Nov. 29, 1949, as amended at 46 FR 57043, Nov. 20, 1981. Redesignated at 61 FR 29024, June 7, 1996]
#### §§ 39.12-39.29 [Reserved]
# Official Journal C 160/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6311 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6311 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 160/01 | Euro exchange rates — 8 May 2020 | 1 |
| 2020/C 160/02 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers at its meeting of 24 October 2019 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M. 9064 – Telia/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding Rapporteur: Hungary | 2 |
| 2020/C 160/03 | Final Report of the Hearing Officer Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding (M.9064) | 5 |
| 2020/C 160/04 | Summary of Commission Decision of 12 November 2019 declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.9064 – Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding)
  (notified under document number C(2019) 7985)

   (
  1
  ) | 6 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 160/01

Euro exchange rates — 8 May 2020

1

2020/C 160/02

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers at its meeting of 24 October 2019 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M. 9064 – Telia/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding Rapporteur: Hungary

2

2020/C 160/03

Final Report of the Hearing Officer Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding (M.9064)

5

2020/C 160/04

Summary of Commission Decision of 12 November 2019 declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.9064 – Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding)
  (notified under document number C(2019) 7985)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document number C(2019) 7985)

1

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 160/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9845 – Davidson Kempner Capital Management/GoldenTree Asset Management/Quorum Health Corporation) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2020/C 160/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9801 – Allianz/OMERS Infrastructure/T&R JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 17 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 160/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9845 – Davidson Kempner Capital Management/GoldenTree Asset Management/Quorum Health Corporation) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

2020/C 160/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9801 – Allianz/OMERS Infrastructure/T&R JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
                       
<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   Sept-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<CASH>                           3,809
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   29,328
<ALLOWANCES>                       356
<INVENTORY>                     23,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                63,638
<PP&E>                          49,492
<DEPRECIATION>                  23,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  90,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           25,348
<BONDS>                              0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           593
<OTHER-SE>                      62,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    90,762
<SALES>                        121,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   93,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                16,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 11,862
<INCOME-TAX>                     4,368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              7,494
<DISCONTINUED>                  (7,129)    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                       365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                         <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    326
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,667
<ALLOWANCES>                              (57)
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                                    237
<DEPRECIATION>                           (210)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     331
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  587
<OTHER-SE>                              1,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,962
<SALES>                                   599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          599
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           302
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.26
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2422 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2422

    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2007

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    A railroad carrier shall transmit to the Secretary of 
Transportation, and annually update, a plan for providing notification 
to local emergency responders before transporting hazardous materials 
through their jurisdictions.

SEC. 2. DEMONSTRATION.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a requirement that 
railroad carriers periodically demonstrate to the Secretary that the 
procedures set forth in the plan transmitted under section 1 are 
adequate to provide appropriate notice to local emergency responders.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lena Langman, by her Guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, *v.*L. A. Wilmot Milbury, Doing Business as the Milbury Atlantic Supply Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1900.)

Municipal court o£ the city of Mew York — Jurisdiction not afforded hy defendant’s having a place of business in the city.

The Municipal Court of the city of New York has no jurisdiction of a defendant unless the record shows that he is a resident, and his having a place of business in the city is not enough.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon a trial had before the court, without a jury.

Henry L. Maxson, for appellant.

Ho appearance for respondent.

*■Per Curiam.*

The fact that the defendant had, at the time of the trial, a place of business in the city of Hew York, does not satisfy the jurisdictional requirement. Proof of actual residence will alone suffice (Routenberg v. Schweitzer, 29 Misc. Rep. 653; affd., 50 App. Div. 218; and, since this proof is not furnished by the record, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered. As the question was raised upon the trial, the reversal will be with costs, to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.
<PAGE>

                KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                     (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the Thirteen Weeks Ended              For the Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                          July 3, 1999                            June 27, 1998
                                            -------------------------------------      ------------------------------------
                                                                        Per-Share                                 Per-Share
                                                Income        Shares     Amount          Income        Shares      Amount
                                            --------------    ------    ---------      ------------    ------     ---------
<S>                                         <C>               <C>       <C>            <C>             <C>        <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings                                        $1,909    27,974        $0.07            $4,108    27,213         $0.15
                                                                        =========                                 =========

EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Excess of shares issuable upon
  exercise of stock options over
  shares deemed retired utilizing
  the treasury stock method                              -       355                              -       699
                                            --------------    ------                   ------------    ------

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings plus assumed conversions               $1,909    28,329        $0.07            $4,108    27,912         $0.15
                                            ==============    ======    =========      ============    ======     =========
</TABLE>
# C_2021032EN.01000501.xml

| 29.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions at its meeting on 23 November 2020 at 15.00–17.30 (CEST (1)) concerning a draft decision concerning Case AT.39686 – Cephalon

Rapporteur: Netherlands

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 32/05)

(1)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees that the Parties were potential competitors.

(2)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees that the Parties’ conduct amounts to a restriction of competition by object with the geographic scope: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

(3)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees that the conduct amounts to a restriction of competition by effect with the geographic scope: France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

(4)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive conduct covered by the draft decision does not meet the conditions for exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU and Article 53(3) of the EEA Agreement.

(5)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the Settlement Agreement between Cephalon and Teva as outlined in the draft decision constitutes an anti-competitive agreement between undertakings that infringes Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

(6)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment in the draft decision as regards the duration of the infringement.

(7)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

(8)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the determination of the fine for Cephalon.

(9)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the determination of the fine for Teva.

(10)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fines.

(11)

The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---

(1)  Central European Summer Time (i.e., Brussels time).

1

---