alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert J. LEE, Appellant, v. James LEE, Orie Lee, Louise Lee, Laura Hill and Harris Hill, Appellees.

No. 81-825.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 17, 1982.

Joseph E. Foster of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for appellant.

Frank M. Townsend of Townsend & Townsend, Kissimmee, for appellee James Lee.

No appearance for appellees, Orie Lee, Louise Lee, Laura Hill and Harris Hill.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, C. J.,

dissents with opinion.

I respectfully dissent.

In my opinion there is a genuine issue of fact as to whether James Lee knew, or under the circumstances should have known, that the property in question was partnership property. As the law requires, I have resolved all doubts and inferences in favor of the non-movant and am left convinced this case should not have been decided by summary judgment. I would reverse the summary judgment and have the case returned for trial. In that event, all the facts could be brought before a jury to determine the matter after resolving the conflicts in the evidence.
#### Margaret Hynes, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Charles F. Brown and Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

Charles Steckler, for respondent.

O’Dwyeb, J.

The plaintiff had a verdict and the only ground upon which the defendant seeks to reverse it is that it is against the weight of evidence. There were two versions of the accident and the jury had the right to consider the probabilities, and it was for them to say, in view of the evidence, which was the true one. The plaintiff, contending that the car had come to a stop and while she was attempting to alight, suddenly starting and throwing her to the ground, and the defendant insisting that she (at the time of the accident, a woman over forty-three years of age) deliberately leaped from the car while it was in full motion, going about six miles an hour, although the accident occurred a little after ten o’clock at night, and it was as dark as usual at that time of night. The conflict in the evidence was submitted in a charge (to which no exception was taken) with full advice to the jury with respect to the law and the obligations of the plaintiff to sustain her contention by a fair preponderance of the evidence, and although there are four witnesses in favor of the defendant and only the plaintiff in her own behalf, we are not prepared to say on this record that the jury failed to discharge their full duty to the defendant, or that the verdict is the result of passion, prejudice, corruption or mistake. Sawalsky v. Penn. R. R. Co., 39 App. Div. 661.

A fair preponderance of evidence does not mean the largest number of witnesses. Martin v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 3 App. Div. 448 ; Norton v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 26 id. 60.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimoes, Oh. J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
§ 20.1001 Rule 1001. When reconsideration is accorded. Reconsideration of an appellate decision may be accorded at any time by the Board of Veterans' Appeals on motion by the appellant or his or her representative or on the Board's own motion: ( a ) Upon allegation of obvious error of fact or law;
( b ) Upon discovery of new evidence in the form of relevant records or reports of the service department concerned; or
( c ) Upon allegation that an allowance of benefits by the Board has been materially influenced by false or fraudulent evidence submitted by or on behalf of the appellant.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7103, 7104)
[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 190, 191, Jan. 18, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 184 (Thursday, September 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48729-48730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1699-000]


Eurus Combine Hills II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 17, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Eurus Combine Hills II, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 17, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 48730]]

dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9afacbbaaa6878580878cba9c9999869b9da98f8c9b8ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cd8b889f8e82a3a1a4a3a89eb8bdbda2bfb98daba8bfaee3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22999 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4809 Expiration of the COVID-19 Veterans Assistance Partial Claim Payment program. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary will not accept a request for a partial claim payment after the date that is 180 days after the date the COVID-19 national emergency ends under the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C.161.
( b ) If a veteran's COVID-19 forbearance does not end until after the date described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary shall accept a request for a partial claim payment, provided that such request is submitted to the Secretary not later than 120 days after the date the veteran exits the COVID-19 forbearance.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the Secretary will not accept a request for a partial claim payment after October 28, 2022.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c), 3720, 3732)
§ 21.8010 Definitions and abbreviations. ( a ) *Program-specific definitions and abbreviations.* For the purposes of this subpart: *Covered birth defect* means the same as defined at § 3.815(c)(3) of this title.
*Eligible child* means, as appropriate, either an *individual* as defined at § 3.814(c)(3) of this title who suffers from spina bifida, or an *individual* as defined at § 3.815(c)(2) of this title who has a covered birth defect other than a birth defect described in § 3.815(a)(2).
*Employment assistance* means employment counseling, placement and post-placement services, and personal and work adjustment training.
*Institution of higher education* has the same meaning that § 21.4200 provides for the term *institution of higher learning.*
*Program of employment services* means the services an eligible child may receive if the child's entire program consists only of employment assistance.
*Program participant* means an eligible child who, following an evaluation in which VA finds the child's achievement of a vocational goal is reasonably feasible, elects to participate in a vocational training program under this subpart.
*Spina bifida* means the same as defined at § 3.814(c)(4) of this title.
*Veteran with covered service in Korea* means a veteran defined at § 3.814(c)(2) of this title.
*Vietnam veteran* means, in the case of a child suffering from spina bifida, the same as defined at § 3.814(c)(1) or § 3.815(c)(1) of this title and, in the case of a child with a covered birth defect, the same as defined at § 3.815(c)(1) of this title.
*Vocational training program* means the vocationally oriented training services, and assistance, including placement and post-placement services, and personal and work-adjustment training that VA finds necessary to enable an eligible child to prepare for and participate in vocational training or employment. A vocational training program may include a program of education offered by an institution of higher education only if the program is predominantly vocational in content.
*VR&E* refers to the Veteran Readiness and Employment activity (usually a division) in a Veterans Benefits Administration regional office, the staff members of that activity in the regional office or in outbased locations, and the services that activity provides. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 1802, 1804, 1811-1812, 1814, 1821, 1831)
( b ) *Other terms and abbreviations.* The following terms and abbreviations have the same meaning or explanation that § 21.35 provides: ( 1 ) CP (Counseling psychologist);
( 2 ) Program of education;
( 3 ) Rehabilitation facility;
( 4 ) School, educational institution, or institution;
( 5 ) Training establishment;
( 6 ) Vocational goal;
( 7 ) VRC (Vocational rehabilitation counselor); and
( 8 ) Workshop.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804, 1811, 1814, 1831)
[67 FR 72565, Dec. 6, 2002, as amended at 76 FR 4250, Jan. 25, 2011; 87 FR 8744, Feb. 16, 2022]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The 1997 Pacific West Coastupper continental slope trawl survey of groundfish resources off Washington,Oregon, and California [electronic resource] : estimates of distribution,abundance, and length composition**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.13/2:NMFS-AFSC-98

Item Number:0208-C-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000726774
 
Text |Appendices: AB | Figures | Tables
 
April 2, 2020
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

 39.2

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
January 15, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID AUSTIN PRICE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00487

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repligen Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the undersigneds knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 8, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Walter C. Herlihy                
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        



|                       |  |     |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: February 8, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Daniel W. Muehl                         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

§ 3.25 Recording requirements for trademark applications and registrations. ( a ) *Documents affecting title.* To record documents affecting title to a trademark application or registration, a legible cover sheet (*see* § 3.31) and one of the following must be submitted: ( 1 ) A copy of the original document;
( 2 ) A copy of an extract from the document evidencing the effect on title; or
( 3 ) A statement signed by both the party conveying the interest and the party receiving the interest explaining how the conveyance affects title.
( b ) *Name changes.* Only a legible cover sheet is required (*See* § 3.31).
( c ) *All documents.* ( 1 ) *For electronic submissions:* All documents must be submitted as digitized images in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) or another form as prescribed by the Director. When printed to a paper size of either 21.6 by 27.9 cm (81 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches) or 21.0 by 29.7 cm (DIN size A4), a 2.5 cm (one-inch) margin must be present on all sides.
( 2 ) *For paper or facsimile submissions:* All documents should be submitted on white and non-shiny paper that is either 81 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches (21.6 by 27.9 cm) or DIN size A4 (21.0 by 29.7 cm) with a one-inch (2.5 cm) margin on all sides in either case. Only one side of each page may be used. The Office will not return recorded documents, so original documents should not be submitted for recording.
[69 FR 29879, May 26, 2004]

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 200.7 Cooperating agencies. ( a ) Federal agencies with jurisdiction by law will be invited to serve as cooperating agencies and Federal agencies with special expertise may be invited to serve as cooperating agencies in the conduct of NEPA review of an AFRH proposed action.
( b ) The responsible AFRH official will invite other Tribal, State, and local agencies to serve as cooperating agencies with subject matter jurisdiction or special expertise in the conduct of NEPA review of an AFRH proposed action.
#### SMITH V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 16, 1912.)

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hou. W. W. Pearson.

Hill, Hill, Wi-iiting & Sterne, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. .Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Walker, P. J.

Reversed and remanded, on the authority of *Townsend v. The*State, 137 Ala. 93; 34 South. 382.
#### § 21.7030 Applications, claims, and time limits.

The provisions of subpart B of this part apply with respect to claims for educational assistance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, VA actions upon receiving a claim, and time limits connected with claims.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3018B, 3034(a), 3471, 5101, 5102, 5103)

[64 FR 23773, May 4, 1999]
§ 14.503 Requests for legal advice and assistance in other than domestic relations matters. ( a ) Requests from administrative officials in the field for legal advice or assistance will be addressed to the appropriate Regional Counsel and will be in writing if requested by the Regional Counsel. Questions regarding insurance activities at St. Paul and Philadelphia should be referred to the Regional Counsel at the respective station. Except as to matters referred to in § 14.504(b), the Regional Counsel's authority to render legal advice and assistance shall extend to the release (unless otherwise instructed by the General Counsel), without prior approval of the General Counsel, of opinions on all legal questions which are either: ( 1 ) Wholly controlled by the interpretation or application of the laws of the State or States in the district office area, or
( 2 ) Covered by Department of Veterans Affairs precedents and opinions of the General Counsel which the Regional Counsel knows to be currently authoritative on the issues involved. In cases covered by § 14.504(b) and all others not included in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) or paragraph (b) of this section, the Regional Counsel will prepare a tentative opinion (including identification of the benefit sought) and forward it to the General Counsel for review. When it is returned, the Regional Counsel will conform the opinion (if necessary) to the views of the General Counsel, and release it to the requesting official. The Regional Counsel may release any modified opinion as the opinion of the General Counsel.
( b ) The Regional Counsel may submit to the General Counsel any legal question, opinion, or question pertinent to legal functions, upon which the views or advice of the General Counsel are desired. This request should set forth the special circumstances, contain a statement of the legal implications involved (including any Department of Veterans Affairs benefits claimed), set forth the facts out of which they arise, and cite any statutes or court decisions readily available, regulations, related opinions of the General Counsel and other matters deemed pertinent, with appropriate discussion. If any administration will be affected, a copy of the reply will be forwarded to that administration head.
[42 FR 41411, Aug. 17, 1977, as amended at 54 FR 34982, Aug. 23, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.176 Consideration of above matters.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 86 FR 64332, Nov. 17, 2021.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 87 FR 62032, Oct. 13, 2022.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 88 FR 62463, Sept. 12, 2023.

The matters in §§ 2.171 to 2.175 will be considered in the first instance by the Post Registration examiners, except for requests to amend registrations involved in *inter partes* proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, as specified in § 2.173(a), which shall be considered by the Board. If an action of the examiner is adverse, the owner of the registration may petition the Director to review the action under § 2.146. If the owner does not respond to an adverse action of the examiner within six months of the date of issuance, the matter will be considered abandoned.

[73 FR 67774, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Waiver Request Support Document

82 Attachment 7 2012 Amendments to OBD II Monito ring Requirements That Clarify Pre-Existing Requirements Amendments to 1968.2
A. Section (c): Definitions. 1. “Calculated load value” 2. “Fueled engine operation” 3. “Hybrid vehicle” 4. “Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles” 5. “Propulsion system active” B. Section (d): General Requirements 1. Section (d)(2.5.2)(B)(iii): Erasing a Permanent Fault Code. 2. Section (d)(4.3.2)(D): Denominator Specifications C. Section (g): Standardization Requirements 1. Section (g)(1.4.1): Reference Documents 2. Section (g)(4.2.6): Required Emission Related Functions