alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133330 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133330 

 COA: 274690 

Washtenaw CC: 05-001226-FH 

ROBERT CHARLES PARHAM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000729976
<NAME>                        ENCIBAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         15,216
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,216
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,209
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,904
<OTHER-SE>                                    (6,897)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,216
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,386)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                       513
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   362
<PP&E>                                          10,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,713
<SALES>                                          6,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,434
<CGS>                                            2,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    972
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       990
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 91/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.091.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 91 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.091.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 91

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 March 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 091/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 31 January 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2014/C 091/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 28 February 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 2 |
| 2014/C 091/03 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 28 February 2014(decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 091/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 31 January 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2014/C 091/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 28 February 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

2

2014/C 091/03

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 28 February 2014(decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

11

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 20.110 Rule 110. Computation of time limit for filing. ( a ) *Acceptance of postmark date.* When these Rules require that any written document be filed within a specified period of time, a response postmarked prior to expiration of the applicable time limit will be accepted as having been timely filed. In the event that the postmark is not of record, the postmark date will be presumed to be five days prior to the date of receipt of the document by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In calculating this 5-day period, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays will be excluded.
( b ) *Computation of time limit.* In computing the time limit for filing a written document, the first day of the specified period will be excluded and the last day included. Where the time limit would expire on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the next succeeding workday will be included in the computation.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105)
[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 182, Jan. 18, 2019]
PRESTON PAMPHILE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1785

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.

Preston Pamphile , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant

Attor ney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 39.51 Payment of grant award. The amount of an Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Project grant award will be paid to the State or Tribal Organization or, if designated by the State or Tribal Organization representative, the State or Tribal veterans cemetery for which such project is being carried out, or to any other State or Tribal Organization agency or instrumentality. Such amount shall be paid by way of reimbursement and in installments that are consistent with the progress of the project, as the Director of the Veterans Cemetery Grants Service may determine and certify for payment to the appropriate Federal institution. Funds paid under this section for an approved Establishment, Expansion, and Improvement Project shall be used solely for carrying out such project as approved. As a condition for the final payment, the representative of the State or Tribal Organization must submit to VA the following: ( a ) Standard Form 271 (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs);
( b ) A request in writing for the final architectural/engineering inspection, including the name and telephone number of the local point of contact for the project;
( c ) The written statement, “It is hereby agreed that the monetary commitment of the Federal government will have been met and the project will be considered terminated upon payment of this voucher.”; and
( d ) Evidence that the State or Tribal Organization has met its responsibility for an audit under the Single Audit Act of 1984 (31 U.S.C. 7501 *et seq.*) and § 39.122, if applicable.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 0348-0002) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2408)
[75 FR 34005, June 16, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 4476, Jan. 30, 2012]
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021(the “Report”) of SLR HC BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, BRUCE J. SPOHLER, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of theRegistrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/ Bruce J. Spohler
**Name**: Bruce J. Spohler**Date**: March 1, 2022**
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 3.58 Governmental registers.

(a) The Office will maintain a Departmental Register to record governmental interests required to be recorded by Executive Order 9424. This Departmental Register will not be open to public inspection but will be available for examination and inspection by duly authorized representatives of the Government. Governmental interests recorded on the Departmental Register will be available for public inspection as provided in § 1.12.

(b) The Office will maintain a Secret Register to record governmental interests required to be recorded by Executive Order 9424. Any instrument to be recorded will be placed on this Secret Register at the request of the department or agency submitting the same. No information will be given concerning any instrument in such record or register, and no examination or inspection thereof or of the index thereto will be permitted, except on the written authority of the head of the department or agency which submitted the instrument and requested secrecy, and the approval of such authority by the Director. No instrument or record other than the one specified may be examined, and the examination must take place in the presence of a designated official of the Patent and Trademark Office. When the department or agency which submitted an instrument no longer requires secrecy with respect to that instrument, it must be recorded anew in the Departmental Register.

[62 FR 53203, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 34124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-12742]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Civil Supersonic Aircraft Panel Discussion

Correction

    In notice document 2011-12742 appearing on page 30231 in the issue 
of Tuesday, May 24, 2011, make the following correction:
    Beginning in the second line from the bottom of the first column 
and continuing to the second line in the second column, the Web site 
address should read as follows: https://spreadsheets.google.com/
spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dEFEdlRnYzBiaHZtTUozTHVtbkF4d0E6MQ.

[FR Doc. C1-2011-12742 Filed 6-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
§ 488.18 Documentation of findings. ( a ) The findings of the State agency with respect to each of the conditions of participation, requirements (for SNFs and NFs), or conditions for coverage must be adequately documented. When the State agency certifies to the Secretary that a provider or supplier is not in compliance with the conditions or requirements (for SNFs and NFs), and therefore not eligible to participate in the program, such documentation includes, in addition to the description of the specific deficiencies which resulted in the agency's recommendation, any provider or supplier response.
( b ) If a provider or supplier is certified by the State agency as in compliance with the conditions or participation requirements (for SNFs and NFs) or as meeting the requirements for special certification (see § 488.54), with deficiencies not adversely affecting the health and safety of patients, the following information will be incorporated into the finding: ( 1 ) A statement of the deficiencies that were found.
( 2 ) A description of further action that is required to remove the deficiencies.
( 3 ) A time-phased plan of correction developed by the provider and supplier and concurred with by the State agency.
( 4 ) A scheduled time for a resurvey of the institution or agency to be conducted by the State agency within 90 days following the completion of the survey.
( c ) If, on the basis of the State certification, the Secretary determines that the provider or supplier is eligible to participate, the information described in paragraph (b) of this section will be incorporated into a notice of eligibility to the provider or supplier.
( d ) If the State agency receives information to the effect that a hospital or a critical access hospital (as defined in section 1861(mm)(1) of the Act) or a rural emergency hospital (as defined in section 1861(kkk)(2) of the Act) has violated § 489.24 of this chapter, the State agency is to report the information to CMS promptly.
[39 FR 2251, Jan. 17, 1974. Redesignated at 39 FR 11419, Mar. 28, 1974, and further redesignated at 42 FR 52826, Sept. 30, 1977. Redesignated at 53 FR 23100, June 17, 1988; 59 FR 32120, June 22, 1994; 59 FR 56237, Nov. 10, 1994; 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997; 88 FR 59335, Aug. 28, 2023]
41702.

#### HALL v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY OF SOUTH GEORGIA, INC.

Argued January 10, 1966

Decided January 26, 1966.

*Albert E. Butler,*for appellant.

*Wilson G. Pedrick, J. Edmund Pedrick,*for appellee.

Jordan, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of *Thornton v. Orkin Exterminating Co.,*ante. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
EX10.1 - Amendment No.1 to Fasteners Asset Purchase Agreement


EXHIBIT 10.1


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT dated as of March 24, 2015 (the “Amendment”) is entered into by and between:
(1)ANIXTER INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Seller”); and
(2) OPTIMAS OE SOLUTIONS, LLC (formerly AIP/FASTENERS LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Buyer” and, collectively with the Seller, the “Parties” and each a “Party”).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Parties are party to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 11, 2015 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Definitions.  Except as otherwise expressly indicated herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.


		
	2.
	Amendment of Agreement Section 6.10(a).  The first sentence of Section 6.10(a) of the Agreement shall be, and hereby is, amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“Neither the Seller nor any of its controlled Affiliates will engage, directly or indirectly, in the Business for a period of five (5) years immediately following the Closing Date; provided, however, that nothing herein shall restrict or prohibit the Seller or any of its Affiliates from (i) engaging in Permitted Activities, (ii) acquiring, by any means, any interest in (including through an acquisition of the assets of) a company that is engaged in the distribution or manufacturing of fastener hardware and components, so long as such business does not make up 20% or more of such company’s revenues, or (iii) engaging, directly or indirectly, in the Business in the United Mexican States at anytime after the third (3rd) anniversary of the Closing Date.”
		
	3.
	No Other Amendment.  Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the Agreement is not, and shall not be deemed to be, amended, modified or waived in any manner whatsoever, and, as so amended, is hereby ratified and confirmed.


		
	4.
	Incoporation of Provisions.  The provisions of Sections 12.7, 12.8, 12.9 and 12.12 of the Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Amendment, mutatis mutandi, as effectively as if set forth herein in full.













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written:
ANIXTER INC. 
 
 
By:      /s/ Rod Shoemaker             
Name: /s/ Rod Shoemaker     
Title:   SVP - Treasurer
    
OPTIMAS OE SOLUTIONS, LLC 
 
 
By:      /s/ Stanley Edme                
Name: /s/ Stanley Edme     
Title:    Vice President and Secretary

Active 18198930.1    2
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2021 -CA -0942

Dionne Christy and Demond Chatman

Versus - - 

Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Lionel Franklin, Jr., 

and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

23rd Judicial District Court

Case #: 124956

Ascension Parish

On Application for R " aring filed on 03/ / 2022 by Dionne Christy and Demond Chatman

Rehearing

v

Iv IIit, S' Ju" JY.

kA rM f 4 relFav- w

Date APR 19 2022

Rodd Naquin, Clerk

J n Michael Guidry

G'u/y Holdridge

Wayr a Ray Chutz
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ARTHUR GILBERT, ) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

v. ) Civil Case No. 05-2128 (RJL) 

) 

JANET NAPOLITANO, ) 

hereby 

Defendant. 

) 

) --tc...---

FINAL JUDGMENT 

(January ~2011) 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is 

ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#66] is 

GRANTED, and it is further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. 

RICHAW~ ~eJJ~ United States District Judge
- Under Secretary Home
- Remarks and Releases

HomeUnder Secretary for Management...Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Management

# 						Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Management					

16 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212018

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJohn BassMatthew Graviss

Select a LocationAustraliaFijiIndiaPapua New GuineaThailand

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Science, Technology, and InnovationMedia NoteOther ReleasePress StatementReadout

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of Overseas SchoolsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Management

          -    		John Bass	  December 29, 2021 
          -    		Jennifer Johnson	  December 29, 2021 
          -    DipNote  		U.S. Department of State Launches First-Ever Data Strategy	  September 27, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		Department Renews Charter of Overseas Schools Advisory Council	  June 17, 2021 
          -    		Under Secretary for Management	  January 20, 2021 
          -    		William E. Todd	  February 1, 2018 

previous page12

Back to Top
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2021 -CA - 0942 Dionne Christy and Demond Chatman Versus - - Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Lionel Franklin, Jr., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 23rd Judicial District Court Case #: 124956 Ascension Parish

On Application for R " 

### aring filed on 03/ / 2022 by Dionne Christy and Demond Chatman Rehearing v 

# IIit, 

# S'Ju" Iv 

# JY. kA rM

# f 4 relFav-w

Date 

# APR 19 2022
Rodd Naquin, Clerk J n Michael Guidry G'u/ y Holdridge Wayra Ray Chutz