alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Virginia E. Ver Planck, Plaintiff, *v.*Mary A. Godfrey et al., Defendants.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1900.)

Foreclosure — Order of publication, directing copies of the summons to be deposited “ in the general post-office *”*at New York, void — Code C. P., § 440.

An order of publication, in foreclosure, having the "caption “ Supreme Court, State of New York”, dated “New York, December 21, 1899”, and directing that copies of the summons should be deposited “ in the general post-office” is defective and should be vacated, as there are a number of general post-offices in the consolidated city of New York and no “ specified post-office ” (Code C. P., § 440) can be said to have been designated in the order.

Motion to vacate an order of publication in an action of foreclosure.

Wyatt *&*Trimble, for plaintiff.

Alden *&*Carpenter, for defendant Godfrey.

Leventbitt, J.

The action is to foreclose a mortgage and application is made to vacate an order of publication. While the allegations tending to show the inability with due diligence to make personal service of the summons are intrinsically weak and are fairly open to the criticism that the efforts made disclose a failure to follow up the ordinary channels pursued in order to obtain information, the more serious defect is a noneompliance with section 440 of the Code of Civil Procedure in that the post-office in which the copies are directed to be deposited is not specified in the order. *55The order provides that “ plaintiff deposit in the general post-office three sets of copies.” The caption of the order reads “ Supreme Court, State of New York,” and it is dated “ New York, December 21, 1899.” The old Code required merely that the order direct the copies be deposited *“*in the post-office.” § 135. The Code of Civil Procedure requires the order to dire*ct*a specified post-office ” (§ 440), and it has been held in several instances that the omission to specify constituted a fatal jurisdictional defect. Eleventh Ward Bank v. Powers, 43 App. Div. 178; McCool v. Boller, 14 Hun, 73; Walter v. DeGraaf, 19 Abb. N. C. 406; Smith v. Wells, 69 N. Y. 600. The use of the words “ general post-office ” is not, in my opinion, a sufficient compliance with the Code provision. The order is equally defective whether we regard the required designation as referring to a differentiation into general and branch offices, or, as is more proper, referring to the locality in which the office is situated from which the mailing is to take place. There are a number of “ general ” post-offices in the present consolidated city of New York, and no locality whatsoever is designated. As the Code, of course, applies to the whole State, to hamlets and villages where there is merely a single post-office as well as to the large cities where there are many, it seems evident that the territorial locality was intended to be designated under the requirement of a specified post-office. The motion to vacate the order of publication must be granted, with ten dollars costs.

Notion granted, with ten dollars costs.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60567

(Summary Calendar)

ROBERT N. ANDERSON, JR.,

Petitioner,

versus

SOUTHERN STEVEDORING COMPANY, INC; TEXAS

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE ASSOCIATION; DIRECTOR, 

OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Benefits Review Board

(86-2610)

May 19, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert N. Anderson appeals an Administrative Law Judge’s(ALJ) denial of medical benefits

under t he Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Anderson also appeals the ALJ’s

denial of a petition to modify the original denial. The Benefits Review Board (BRB) affirmed the
2

ALJ’s decisions. We have reviewed the record and the briefs, and conclude that the ALJ’s rulings

are supported by substantial evidence. The judgment of the BRB is therefore AFFIRMED.
#### § 21.7530 Applications, claims, and time limits.

The provisions of subpart B of this part apply with respect to claims for educational assistance under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606, VA actions upon receiving a claim, and time limits connected with claims.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3472)

[64 FR 23773, May 4, 1999]
#### Julia Kreizer, Respondent, v. Emanuel Frey, Appellant.

Appeal from judgments in favor-of the plaintiff, rendered * in. the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, seventh district. Warren Leslie, for appellant, Fromme Brothers, for respondent. Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

No opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2467 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2467

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ``Frank J. 
                    Guarini Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2007

  Mr. Sires (for himself, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Andrews, Mr. 
      Holt, Mr. Payne, Mr. Rothman, Mr. Saxton, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. 
 Frelinghuysen, and Mr. Ferguson) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ``Frank J. 
                    Guarini Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRANK J. GUARINI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 69 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Frank J. Guarini Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank J. 
Guarini Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 6.19 Evidence to establish death of the insured.

Whenever a claim is filed on account of the death of a person insured under yearly renewable term insurance or United States Government life insurance, the proof of death shall be established in accordance with the provisions of Part 3 of this chapter.

[26 FR 1856, Mar. 3, 1961. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 29025, June 7, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.311 Notice of allowance.

(a) If, on examination, it appears that the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law, a notice of allowance will be sent to the applicant at the correspondence address indicated in § 1.33. The notice of allowance shall specify a sum constituting the issue fee and any required publication fee (§ 1.211(e)), which issue fee and any required publication fee must both be paid within three months from the date of mailing of the notice of allowance to avoid abandonment of the application. This three-month period is not extendable.

(b) An authorization to charge the issue fee or other post-allowance fees set forth in § 1.18 to a deposit account may be filed in an individual application only after mailing of the notice of allowance. The submission of either of the following after the mailing of a notice of allowance will operate as a request to charge the correct issue fee or any publication fee due to any deposit account identified in a previously filed authorization to charge such fees:

(1) An incorrect issue fee or publication fee; or

(2) A fee transmittal form (or letter) for payment of issue fee or publication fee.

[65 FR 57060, Sept. 20, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 67096, Dec. 28, 2001; 69 FR 56545, Sept. 21, 2004; 78 FR 62406, Oct. 21, 2013]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
# Official Journal L 4/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 4 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 509 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 4

English edition

Legislation

Volume 509 January 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 6/2007 of 8 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 7/2007 of 8 January 2007 altering the export refunds on milk and milk products | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 8/2007 of 8 January 2007 providing for the rejection of applications for export licences for certain milk products | 7 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 9/2007 of 8 January 2007 amending the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty | 8 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 6/2007 of 8 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 7/2007 of 8 January 2007 altering the export refunds on milk and milk products

3

Commission Regulation (EC) No 8/2007 of 8 January 2007 providing for the rejection of applications for export licences for certain milk products

7

Commission Regulation (EC) No 9/2007 of 8 January 2007 amending the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
List of Attachments 

/. 

2. 

3. 

7· 

International Labour [sic] Office ( 1971, I 972) Chemical Burns. In: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and 

Safety, Volume 1- A - K, pages 220-221 International Labour Office, CH 1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, 1971. 

Special McGraw-Hill Edition, 1972, Library of Congress Card Number: 74-39329, International Standard Book 

Num ber: 07-079555-X. 

May 6, 2007 complaint to the FBI and Congress from Cate Jenkins, Ph.D., "Complaint and Additional Evidence of 

p/11-i-aud by: USGS, OSI/A, ATSDR. NYC, EPA, and EPA-jimded scientists; (I} Falsification o.fcorrosive pH data 

for WTC dust, (2) Historicalji·aud by HPA of hazardous pH levels since 1980." 

http:l/v.-vi\V.scribd.comfdoc/451 80048/Jcnkins-050607-FBI-WTC' -p~ -LI ES-1 st-('omplaint 

October I 3, 2008 complaint to FBI from Cate Jenkins, Ph.D., "Suppl nt ll~·vidence: Fraud in the Conduct and 

Dissemination t?{ Human '/'issue Corrosivity Data (pH tests) in the Ajiermath of I he World Trade Center Disaster." 

http://www.scribcl.com/doc/45 1 &04 I 0/Jenkins-1 0 1308-FBI-Ncw-WTC-pii-Lies-?nd-Cornplaint 

Robert W. Dellinger, former Director, Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division, EPA, hand-written 

comments on Jenkins' May 6, 2007 complaint to the FBI and Congress. 

August 16, 20 I 0 Declaration of Rober1 W. Dellinger (under penalty of perjury) 

April 22,2011 Deposition of Robert W. Dellinger, former Director, Materials Recovery and Waste Management 

Division, EPA, pp. I 61-I 76. 

July 29,2011 Declaration of Gregory Helms (under penalty of perjury) 

38
§ 21.7612 Programs of education combining two or more types of courses. An approved program may consist of courses offered by two educational institutions concurrently, or courses offered through class attendance and by television concurrently. An educational institution may contract the actual training to another educational institution, provided the course is approved by the State approving agency having approval jurisdiction over the educational institution actually providing the training. ( a ) *Concurrent enrollment.* When a reservist cannot schedule his or her complete program at one educational institution, VA may approve a program of concurrent enrollment. When requesting such a program, the reservist must show that his or her complete program of education is not available at the educational institution in which he or she will pursue the major portion of his or her program (the primary educational institution), or that it cannot be scheduled within the period in which he or she plans to complete his or her program. A reservist who is limited in the types of courses he or she may pursue, as provided in § 21.7540 (b)(2) and (b)(3), may pursue courses only at an institution of higher learning. If such a reservist cannot complete his or her program at one institution of higher learning, VA may approve a concurrent enrollment only if both the educational institutions the reservist enrolls in are institutions of higher learning. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2131(c), 2136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3680(g); sec. 705(a)(1), Pub. L. 98-525, 98 Stat. 2565, 2567; sec. 642, Pub. L. 101-189, 103 Stat. 1456-1458)
( b ) *Television.* In determining whether a reservist may pursue all or part of a program of education by television, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4233(c).
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3680A)
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996; 61 FR 29303, June 10, 1996; 62 FR 40280, July 28, 1997]
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 18 May 2005         

amending for the fifth time Decision 2004/122/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in North Korea

(notified under document number C(2005) 1451)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/390/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/122/EC is replaced by the following text:

‘1.   Member States shall suspend the importation from Cambodia, China including Hong Kong, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, North Korea, Pakistan, Thailand and Vietnam of:

Article 2

The Member States shall amend the measures they apply to imports so as to bring them into compliance with this Decision and they shall give immediate appropriate publicity to the measures adopted. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 278, 31.10.2000, p. 26. Decision as last amended by Decision 2002/279/EC (OJ L 99, 16.4.2002, p. 17).

(4)OJ L 273, 10.10.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2005 (OJ L 66, 12.3.2005, p. 10).

(5)OJ L 36, 7.2.2004, p. 59. Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/194/EC (OJ L 63, 10.3.2005, p. 25).

----
----

|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 1, 2022 | /s/ Lew Frankfort                                                    |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Lew Frankfort                                                        |
|                | Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, D. Gary McRae, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: December 13, 2005     /s/ D. Gary McRae   D. Gary McRae
# Official Journal C 195/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.195.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 195 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 542 July 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.195.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 195

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 542 July 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2011/C 195/01 | Opinion No 4/2011 on the Commission’s Green Paper on the Modernisation of Public Procurement Policy (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

Court of Auditors

2011/C 195/01

Opinion No 4/2011 on the Commission’s Green Paper on the Modernisation of Public Procurement Policy (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

(pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN