alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Matter of the Petition of Joseph Auerbach to Revoke and Cancel the Liquor Tax Certificate No. 6615, Issued to Johannes M. Johannsen.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1900.)

Liquor Tax Law — Revocation of certificate for false answers — Reference refused.

A liquor tax certificate will be revoked, for false answers to the application, where the holder does not deny by affidavit the verified *45allegation of the petitioner for revocation that the answer to the question, whether he was entitled to traffic in liquors, was false in that he had not obtained the requisite consent of property owners of buildings, used exclusively for dwellings, within the statutory two hundred foot radius.

Where the denial of the holder is only in the form of a pleading, the court will revoke the certificate without appointing a referee to take testimony and report.

Application under subdivision 2 of section 28 of the liquor Tax Law (L. 1896, eh. 112) to revoke a license heretofore issued to Johannes M. Johannsen on the ground that the liquor tax certificate was issued upon an application in which the applicant made false answers.

William S. Gordon, for petitioner.

Lawrence, J.

This is an application under subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law, to revoke a license heretofore issued to Johannes M. Johannsen on the ground, among others, that the liquor tax certificate was issued upon an application in which the applicant made false answers. In the view which I take of this case it is not necessary to consider all the answers which are alleged to be false. In answer to question 13 as to whether the applicant was entitled to traffic in liquors on the premises in question, the appplicant answered, “Tes.”" It appears from the affidavits read on the motion that this statement was false, because two-thirds of the property-owners of all the buildings used exclusively for dwellings within 200 feet of the nearest entrance to the saloon premises did not assent to the applicant obtaining a certificate for the purpose of carrying on the sale of liquors. § 17 of the Liquor Tax Law, subd. 8. In answer to a subsequent question, respondent said there were no buildings exclusively used for dwelling purposes within 200 feet of the nearest entrance to the saloon premises. The petition and affidavits show that there are several of such dwelling-houses within the prescribed limits (see petition and affidavits attached). Although the respondent denies the allegations in the petition in regard to the falsity of his answers, he presents no affidavit in opposition to the petitioner’s affidavits as to the location of his premises being within 200 feet, measured in a straight *46line to the nearest entrance to several buildings used exclusively for dwellings. Such being the case, I do not think that a reference is-necessary. See Matter of Bridge, 36 App. Div. 533.

Ordered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(i)

                               COMM BANCORP, INC.

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William F. Farber, Sr., the President and Chief Executive Officer of Comm
Bancorp, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, of
      the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

Date: August 13, 2004                        /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
                                             -----------------------------
                                             William F. Farber, Sr.
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                       53
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.




Dated:  November
      5, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Colin DunnColin
      Dunn, Vice President of Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      <ARTICLE> 5
      <LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
      </LEGEND>
             
      <S>                                            <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
      <PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
      <CASH>                                          21,045
      <SECURITIES>                                         0
      <RECEIVABLES>                                   10,585
      <ALLOWANCES>                                    73,406
      <INVENTORY>                                          0
      <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,555
      <PP&E>                                         656,581
      <DEPRECIATION>                                  34,160
      <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 884,468
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,848
      <BONDS>                                              0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
      <PREFERRED>                                          0
      <COMMON>                                     4,456,457
      <OTHER-SE>                                 (4,997,302)
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   884,468
      <SALES>                                        231,088
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,306
      <CGS>                                          283,484
      <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  408,016
      <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,864
      <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
      <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
      <INCOME-PRETAX>                              (106,574)
      <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
      <INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (106,574)
      <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
      <CHANGES>                                            0
      <NET-INCOME>                                 (106,574)
      <EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.018)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.018)
              
      
</TABLE>
§ 14.702 Medical testimony in commitment or restoration proceedings. ( a ) *Commitment.* When permissable under State law, Department of Veterans Affairs physicans, upon request of the Regional Counsel, will sign interrogatories or certificates of mental illness or insanity and, unless unavailable, as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, will testify in proceedings which the Regional Counsel is authorized to institute under § 14.701 to commit eligible veterans to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) *Restoration.* ( 1 ) When permissible under State law, Department of Veterans Affairs physicans, upon the request of the Regional Counsel, will testify in proceedings brought for the purpose of restoring a committed veteran to full civil rights when the veteran is a committed patient in a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital.
( 2 ) The Director of a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or the Regional Counsel upon discharge of the veteran, may furnish a certificate of sanity or such similar certificate to the proper civil authorities.
( c ) *Employment of private physicians.* When testimony of Department of Veterans Affairs physicians is prohibited or is unavailable because of a duty assignment, comparative expense or other valid reason, the Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, upon recommendation of the Regional Counsel, may employ any qualified physician for preliminary examination of the veteran and for testimony in any commitment or restoration proceeding which the Regional Counsel is authorized to institute under § 14.701, and authorize the payment of a fee not to exceed the prescribed fee, or in the absence thereof, the customary fee charged for the service rendered.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.166 Specimens.

The applicant may be required to furnish specimens of the plant, or its flower or fruit, in a quantity and at a time in its stage of growth as may be designated, for study and inspection. Such specimens, properly packed, must be forwarded in conformity with instructions furnished to the applicant. When it is not possible to forward such specimens, plants must be made available for official inspection where grown.

(35 U.S.C. 114, 161)

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Reginald Genell Johnson, * From the 104th District Court

 of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 21591B.

Vs. No. 11-19-00137-CR * April 8, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

we modify the judgment of the trial court to reflect that Reginald Genell Johnson 

pleaded “TRUE” to the first enhancement paragraph and that the jury found the 

enhancement paragraph to be “TRUE.” As modified, we affirm the judgment of 

the trial court.
§ 21.9665 Reimbursement for licensing or certification tests. An eligible individual is entitled to receive reimbursement for taking one licensing or certification test. The amount of educational assistance VA will pay as reimbursement for an approved licensing or certification test taken on or after August 1, 2009, is the lesser of the following: ( a ) The fee that the licensing or certification organization offering the test charges for taking the test; or
( b ) $2,000.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3315)
§ 93.105 Time limitations. ( a ) *Six-year limitation.* This part applies only to research misconduct occurring within six years of the date HHS or an institution receives an allegation of research misconduct.
( b ) *Exceptions to the six-year limitation.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply in the following instances: ( 1 ) *Subsequent use exception.* The respondent continues or renews any incident of alleged research misconduct that occurred before the six-year limitation through the citation, republication or other use for the potential benefit of the respondent of the research record that is alleged to have been fabricated, falsified, or plagiarized.
( 2 ) *Health or safety of the public exception.* If ORI or the institution, following consultation with ORI, determines that the alleged misconduct, if it occurred, would possibly have a substantial adverse effect on the health or safety of the public.
( 3 ) *“Grandfather” exception.* If HHS or an institution received the allegation of research misconduct before the effective date of this part.
#### § 20.1300 Rule 1300. Removal of Board records.

No original record, paper, document or exhibit certified to the Board may be taken from the Board except as authorized by the Chairman or except as may be necessary to furnish copies or to transmit copies for other official purposes.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5701)

[61 FR 29028, June 7, 1996]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    this Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2007 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Thor Industries, Inc.
 Date:   July 3, 2007
    /s/ Wade F. B. ThompsonWade F. B. ThompsonChairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) 30
###### Editorial Note on Part 501

#### Editorial Note:

At 78 FR 4766, Jan. 23, 2013, parts 500-599 were transferred from Title 37, Chapter V, to Title 37, Chapter IV. Chapter V was removed and reserved.

#### § 501.4 Determination of inventions and rights.

Each Government agency has the approval of the Secretary to determine whether the results of research, development, or other activity in the agency constitute an invention within the purview of Executive Order 10096, as amended by Executive Order 10930 and Executive Order 10695, and to determine the rights in and to the invention in accordance with the provisions of §§ 501.6 and 501.7.

[61 FR 40999, Aug. 7, 1996]
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 19, 2024


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-B
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
City Court of New York — General Term,

May, 1900.

Before Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.

#### William B. Crawford et al., Respondents, v. John Fury, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

Early, Heath *&*Stewart (Henry K. Heath, of counsel), for Appellant; John J. Brady, for Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE THREE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         31,606,662
<SECURITIES>                                    2,102,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,457,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                      238,000
<INVENTORY>                                    10,646,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,653,276
<PP&E>                                         55,222,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,979,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85,532,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,479,465
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                          514,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     75,588,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   85,532,623
<SALES>                                        19,514,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,514,700
<CGS>                                          13,177,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,565,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,365,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                      399,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,966,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,966,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .56
        



</TABLE>
NO. 07-10-0234-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JULY 13, 2010

In re JOHNNY LEE REY, Relator 

***Memorandum Opinion***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Pending before the court is the petition of Johnny Lee Rey for a writ of mandamus.  Rey asks that we direct the Honorable Ana Estevez, District Judge, 251st Judicial District, to act upon a pending motion and to void an “Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds” (Order to Withdraw).  We deny the petition. 

	The motion in question involved Rey’s effort to have the trial court vacate the aforementioned Order to Withdraw.  The trial court acted upon that motion by denying it on June 25, 2010.  A true and correct copy of that order is attached to this opinion as exhibit A.  Thus, the portion of Rey’s petition asking us to direct the trial court to act upon his motion is now moot.

To the extent that the trial court issued the Order to Withdraw and now denied Rey’s motion to strike or otherwise vacate it, the appropriate avenue for relief available to him is via appeal.  *Harrel v. State*, 286 S.W.3d 315, 321 (Tex. 2009).  Since the Texas Supreme Court has so held, he has an adequate remedy of law and, therefore, is not entitled to relief via mandamus.

	The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

							Per Curiam  

3

# image1.emf
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| Open-File Report 2002–0139 |

## Magnetic Susceptibilities Measured on Rocks of the Upper Cook Inlet, Alaska  

*By* A.A. Alstatt, R.W. Saltus, R.L. Bruhn, *and* P.J.Haeussler

Version 1.0

----

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.

Report PDF file (37 MB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

**Additional PDF files:** Data PDF files Map PDF files Photograph PDF files

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2002/ofr-02-0139/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wed Dec  7 19:04 EDT 2016 |  |

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2356 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to encourage the display of the 

flag of the United States on Father’s Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2007 

Mr. SCOTT of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to encourage the 

display of the flag of the United States on Father’s Day. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL OCCASSION FOR DISPLAY OF THE 

4 FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. 

5 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amend6 ed by inserting after ‘‘Flag Day, June 14;’’ the following: 

7 ‘‘Father’s Day, third Sunday in June;’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### § 21.7659 Reporting fee.

In determining the amount of the reporting fee payable to educational institutions for furnishing required reports, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4206.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3684)

[62 FR 55762, Oct. 28, 1997]
#### § 17.95 Outpatient medical services for Department of Veterans Affairs employees and others in emergencies.

Outpatient medical services for which charges shall be made as required by § 17.102 may be authorized for employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs, their families, and the general public in emergencies, subject to conditions stipulated by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1784)

[47 FR 58249, Dec. 30, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21965, 21967, May 13, 1996; 79 FR 54615, Sept. 12, 2014]