alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Company. |

|        |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |

|   | Name:  | Bernard      Zimmerman                                                                            |
|--------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Title:      | President, Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer                  |

|  |  |
|--|--|
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2402 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased imprisonment 

for certain offenses by public officials. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2007 

Mr. CARDOZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased 

imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Official Ac5 countability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter D of chapter 227 of 

8 title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2402 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses 

2 by public officials. 

3 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In any Federal criminal case 

4 in which a public official is convicted of an offense against 

5 the United States— 

6 ‘‘(1) consisting of conduct during the course of 

7 official duty, intended to enrich that official; and 

8 ‘‘(2) involving bribery, fraud, extortion, or theft 

9 of public funds greater than $10,000; 

10 the sentencing judge may increase the sentence of impris11 onment by an amount of up to 2 years. The sentencing 

12 judge may double the sentence of imprisonment that 

13 would otherwise be imposed in that case: Provided, how14 ever, That in no instance may the sentencing judge be al15 lowed to increase the sentence by more than 2 years. 

16 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘public 

17 official’ means— 

18 ‘‘(1) an elected official of the United States or 

19 of a State or local government; 

20 ‘‘(2) a presidentially-appointed official; and 

21 ‘‘(3) an official appointed to a State or local 

22 governmental office by an elected official of a State 

23 or local government.’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 at the beginning of subchapter D of chapter 227 of title 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2402 IH

1 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new item: 

‘‘3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
### I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-80,333-02

IN RE ANTHONY MUR ILLO , Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1019477 IN THE 182 DISTRICT COURT nd F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for le ave to f ile an applica

tion for a writ of m andamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 182 nd District Court of Harris C ounty , that more than 35 day s have elapsed, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court e ntere d an orde r desig nating issues in J une 2013. Respondent, the J udg e of the 182 District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with n d this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall2

be submitt ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s of the date of this order

. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response

.
Filed: Aug ust 20, 2014 Do not publish
#### § 4.1 Essentials of evaluative rating.

This rating schedule is primarily a guide in the evaluation of disability resulting from all types of diseases and injuries encountered as a result of or incident to military service. The percentage ratings represent as far as can practicably be determined the average impairment in earning capacity resulting from such diseases and injuries and their residual conditions in civil occupations. Generally, the degrees of disability specified are considered adequate to compensate for considerable loss of working time from exacerbations or illnesses proportionate to the severity of the several grades of disability. For the application of this schedule, accurate and fully descriptive medical examinations are required, with emphasis upon the limitation of activity imposed by the disabling condition. Over a period of many years, a veteran's disability claim may require reratings in accordance with changes in laws, medical knowledge and his or her physical or mental condition. It is thus essential, both in the examination and in the evaluation of disability, that each disability be viewed in relation to its history.

[41 FR 11292, Mar. 18, 1976]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4808 No effect on the servicing of the guaranteed loan. ( a ) Servicers must continue to service the guaranteed loan in accordance with subpart B of this part.
( b ) The liability of the United States for any guaranteed loan shall decrease or increase pro rata with any decrease or increase of the amount of the unpaid portion of the guaranteed loan. A partial claim payment does not affect the guaranty percentage established at the time the guaranteed loan was made.
( c ) Receipt of a partial claim payment shall not eliminate a servicer's option under 38 U.S.C. 3732 to convey to the Secretary the security for the guaranteed loan.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c), 3720, 3732)
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.1002 Political subdivisions of United States.

No part of any accrued benefits will be used to reimburse any political subdivision of the United States for expenses incurred in the last sickness or burial of any beneficiary. (See § 3.1(o)).

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5121(b) and 5502(d))

[39 FR 15126, May 1, 1974]
§ 21.7700 State approving agencies. VA and State approving agencies have the same general responsibilities for approving courses for training under 38 U.S.C. chapter 1606 (or 10 U.S.C. chapter 106 as in effect before December 1, 1994) as they do for approving courses for training under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30 or 32. Accordingly, in administering 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 (or 10 U.S.C. chapter 106 as in effect before December 1, 1994), VA will apply the provisions of the following sections: ( a ) § 21.4150—Designation,
( b ) § 21.4151—Cooperation,
( c ) § 21.4152—Control by agencies of the United States,
( d ) § 21.4153—Reimbursement of expenses,
( e ) Section 21.4154—Report of activities,
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3670 through 3676)
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 48844, Nov. 23, 1990; 61 FR 29310, June 10, 1996]
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0011

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF: H.D.K., A Protected Person. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 1 1 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellee ’ s response brief filed electronically on June 28, 2021 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below
-referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. R. 10(6) pertains to use of initials for parties in certain proceedings. It states: “In any proceeding regarding . . . Title 72, Chapter 5, part 3 (Guardians of Incapacitated Persons), only the initials of the child, parent(s), or individual party(i es), as the case may be, may be used in all filings. ” This matter on appeal pertains to § 72 - 5 - 401, MCA, original p etition for appointment or protective order . However, b ecause H.D.K. has been previously deemed a protected person pursuant to Title 7 2, Chapter 5, Part 3 , any reference to her name must utilize initials. A ppellee ’ s brief incorporates her full name on page 5 and her last name on page 6 of the response brief date d June 28, 2021. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellee shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified R ule and that the Appellee shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record ; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or deletions other than 06/28/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0011those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellee and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: Laurie McKinnon Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2021
#### MILES V. THE STATE.

(Decided April 4, 1912.)

Appeal from Marengo- Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. E. J. Gilder.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on the record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CELESTIAL SEASONINGS, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (756)
<INVENTORY>                                      19204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42982
<PP&E>                                           31023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12217)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   81189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            15518
<BONDS>                                          11675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                       53913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     81189
<SALES>                                          37662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37662
<CGS>                                            14003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 19249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4168
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1563
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2605
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
exv10w1



 



Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO THE EMPLOYMENT AND COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CHOICEPOINT INC. AND DEREK V. SMITH

DATED APRIL 25, 2002



Pursuant to the action of the Management Compensation and Benefits Committee
taken on July 29, 2003, the Employment and Compensation Agreement between
ChoicePoint Inc. and Derek V. Smith dated April 25, 2002, is hereby amended as
of July 29, 2003.



	 	(i)	 	Exhibit B is amended by changing the last sentence of Section 3(e)
“Non-Qualified Plan” to read




		
	 	“Executive shall be entitled to a SERP contribution in the
following percentages of ‘Compensation’, as that term is defined
in such plan, for the periods indicated:




		
	 	40% from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003;

45% for years commencing on or after January 1, 2004;” and




	 	(ii)	 	add on said Exhibit B next to the “Benefit – Corporate Aircraft,”
the phrase “and access provided for ten years following the maturity of
this Employment Agreement, including its three-year extension, to an
aircraft comparable to that provided to Executive at the maturity date
(including its three-year extension) of this Employment Agreement, at a
rate of 75 hours per year on the same basis as personal usage during
the term of this Employment Agreement” in the column “Amount”.




	 	 	 
	 	
Employer

CHOICEPOINT INC.
	 	 	
 
	 	By:/s/	
   Kenneth G. Langone
	 	 	


	 	Name:	
Kenneth G. Langone
	 	Title:	
Chairman, Management

Compensation & Benefits Committee
	 	 	
 
	 	
EXECUTIVE:
	 	 	
 
	 	
/s/ Derek V. Smith
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE SIX
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,648,328
<SECURITIES>                                 3,963,220
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,814,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,562,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,605,618
<PP&E>                                      51,992,096
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,435,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,960,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,157,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       507,495
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,383,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,960,517
<SALES>                                     34,710,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,710,894
<CGS>                                       24,478,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,981,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,411,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                   969,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,442,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,442,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.370 Pulmonary tuberculosis shown by X-ray in active service. ( a ) *Active disease.* X-ray evidence alone may be adequate for grant of direct service connection for pulmonary tuberculosis. When under consideration, all available service department films and subsequent films will be secured and read by specialists at designated stations who should have a current examination report and X-ray. Resulting interpretations of service films will be accorded the same consideration for service-connection purposes as if clinically established, however, a compensable rating will not be assigned prior to establishment of an active condition by approved methods.
( b ) *Inactive disease.* Where the veteran was examined at time of entrance into active service but X-ray was not made, or if made, is not available and there was no notation or other evidence of active or inactive reinfection type pulmonary tuberculosis existing prior to such entrance, it will be assumed that the condition occurred during service and direct service connection will be in order for inactive pulmonary tuberculosis shown by X-ray evidence during service in the manner prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, unless lesions are first shown so soon after entry on active service as to compel the conclusion, on the basis of sound medical principles, that they existed prior to entry on active service.
( c ) *Primary lesions.* Healed primary type tuberculosis shown at the time of entrance into active service will not be taken as evidence to rebut direct or presumptive service connection for active reinfection type pulmonary tuberculosis.
[26 FR 1591, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 43 FR 45347, Oct. 2, 1978]
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 22-1847

_______________

JAMES STEUERT,

Appellant

v.

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 1:11-cv-03385)

District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez

_______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) 

on January 26, 2023

Before: BIBAS, NYGAARD, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Filed: January 26, 2023)

_______________

OPINION*

_______________

BIBAS, Circuit Judge. 

James Steuert appeals the dismissal of his complaint. But because the District Court 

never issued a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction to review that dismissal. 28 U.S.C. 

§1291. The District Court gave Steuert twenty days to file an amended complaint but did 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding 

precedent.
2

not “provide[] express notice” that its order would “automatically produce a final order of 

dismissal when the time to amend [ran] out.” Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F.3d 232, 240 (3d 

Cir. 2019). And though Steuert filed a notice of appeal after those twenty days, he did not 

clearly stand on his complaint. See id. So we will dismiss his appeal.
EX-4.a



 CONTRACT DATA PAGE 

Contract Number:
[P9999999999]                        Contract Date: [May 2, 2011] 

 

			
	Owner: [JOHN DOE]		[Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]     Age at Issue: [35]]
		
	[Owner: [JANE DOE]		Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]
		
	Annuitant: [JOHN DOE]		Date of Birth: [March 1, 1976]       Age at Issue: [35]
		
	[Annuitant: [JANE DOE]		Date of Birth: [June 10, 1976]        Age at Issue: [34]]

 Beneficiary: As named by You 

Initial Purchase Payment: [$10,000.00] 
 Purchase
Payment Age Limit: [Prior to the 86th birthday] 
 Minimum Subsequent Purchase Payment:
[$500] 
 Fixed Account Options – Minimum Guarantee Rate: [1.0% - 3.0%] 

Minimum Partial Withdrawal Amount: [$1,000] 
 Maximum
Penalty-Free Withdrawal Percentage: [10%] 
 Minimum Systematic Withdrawal Amount: [$100] 

Minimum Amount Remaining After a Partial Withdrawal: [$2,500] 

Withdrawal Charge Schedule: 
  





 
 See Page 11 for Withdrawal Provisions. 

  

					
	AS-993-PPIII (12/10)		3		










 CONTRACT DATA PAGE (Cont’d.) 

 

 Minimum Transfer Amount: [$100] 

Separate Account Charge (including guaranteed death benefit risk charge of [0.10%]): [1.30%] 

Annual Contract Maintenance Fee: [$50] 
 Transfer
Fee: [$25] 
 Earliest Annuity Date After Contract Date: [Two years] 

Latest Annuity Date: [1st day of the month following Age 95] 

Separate Account: [Variable Separate Account] 
  

									
	



		 Optional Elections:
 SunAmerica Income
Plus
				 Optional Election Details:
 See
Attached Endorsement ASE-6248
		 





							


  

					
	AS-993-PPIII (12/10)		4
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7752

STEPHEN D. HERTO , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN T. MURPHY, Acting Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:17

- cv
- 00054

- JPB

- JPM )

Submitted : March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Stephen D. Herto, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stephen D. Herto seeks to appeal the district court ’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition and giving him an opportunity to abandon the claims the district court found une xhausted or to stay the action pending exhaustion in state court . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (201 8 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (201 8 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). The order Herto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis , dismiss the appeal for la ck of jurisdiction , and deny Herto’s motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid th e decisional process.
DISMISSED