This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 61361

Vol. 75, No. 192

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**10 CFR Part 429**

**[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–CE–0014]**

**RIN 1904–AC24**

**Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and**  **Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial**  **Equipment**

Correction

In proposed rule document 2010– 22353 beginning on page 56796 in the issue of Thursday, September 16, 2010 make the following correction:

**§429.9 [Corrected]**

On page 56816, in §429.9(c), in the first column, §429.9(c)(9) through (10) is being printed in its entirety:

(9)(i) For each basic model of direct heating equipment (not including furnaces) a sample of sufficient size shall be tested to insure that–

(A) Any represented value of estimated annual operating cost, energy consumption or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor lower values shall be no less than the higher of:

( 1 ) The mean of the sample, or (2) The upper 97 1 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit of the true mean divided by 1.05, and

(B) Any represented value of the fuel utilization efficiency or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor higher values shall be no greater than the lower of:

( 1 ) The mean of the sample or (2) The lower 97 1 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit of the true mean divided by 0.95.

(ii) In calculating the measures of energy consumption for each unit tested, use the design heating requirement corresponding to the mean of the capacities of the units of the sample.

(10) For each basic model of conventional cooking tops, conventional ovens and microwave ovens a sample of sufficient size shall be tested to insure that–

(i) Any represented value of estimated annual operating cost, energy consumption or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor lower values shall be no less than the higher of:

(A) The mean of the sample, or (B) The upper 97 1 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit of the true mean divided by 1.05, and

(ii) Any represented value of the energy factor or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor higher values shall be no greater than the lower of:

(A) The mean of the sample, or (B) The lower 97 1 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit of the true mean divided by 0.95.

[FR Doc. C1–2010–22353 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0994; Directorate Identifier 2009–NE–39–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211–535 Series Turbofan**  **Engines**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

There have been several findings of cracking at the firtrees of LP Turbine discs. Fatigue crack initiation and subsequent crack propagation at the firtree may result in multiple LP Turbine blade release. The latter may potentially be beyond the containment capabilities of the engine casings. Thus, cracking at the firtrees of LP Turbine discs constitutes a potentially unsafe condition. We are proposing this AD to detect cracks in the low-pressure turbine stage 1, 2, and 3 discs, which could result in an uncontained release of LP turbine blades and damage to the airplane.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 19,
2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. Contact Rolls-Royce plc., P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; Telephone: 011 44 1332 242424, Fax: 011 44 1332 249936; e-mail: tech.help@rolls-royce.com for the service information identified in this proposed AD or download the publication from https:// www.aeromanager.com/. Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the same as the Mail address provided in the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238–7178; fax (781) 238–7199.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about