alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00162

- CR

Trial Court Cause

Number: 11CR0210

Style: J.B. Degrassa, Jr.

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : January 14, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File State's Re sponse Brief

Party filing motion: State

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 12, 2012

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

Date Requested: February 11, 2013

O rdered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 11, 2013

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: January 23, 2013
EXHIBIT 10.8
                                                                    ------------



                            FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE

     THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is written and made in duplicate on this 9th
day of July, 2001, by and between SCHNITZER INVESTMENT CORP. ("Landlord") and
SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. ("Tenant"). Each may be referred to from time
to time as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties."


                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, under a certain indenture of Lease (the "Lease") dated September
1, 1988, as amended by the Amendment of Lease dated July 2, 1990, the Second
Amendment of Lease dated October 28, 1994, the Third Amendment of Lease dated
February, 1998 and the Fourth Amendment of Lease dated July 1, 1998, which are,
with the Lease, incorporated by this reference, Landlord leased certain real
property in Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, as described in the Lease to
Tenant.

     WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have agreed to temporarily modify Tenant's
"Base Rent", as that term is defined in the Lease; and it is the purpose of the
Fifth Amendment of Lease to set forth all the terms and conditions of the
Parties agreement in that regard.


                                    AGREEMENT

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained in this Fifth Amendment of Lease, the Parties covenant and agree as
follows:

     1.  RENT REDUCTION: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Lease,
     Tenant's Base Rent for the months of August, 2001 and September, 2001 will
     be $91.767.00 per month.

     2.  OTHER TERMS: Except as they may be modified in this Fifth Amendment of
     Lease, all the other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain
     unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Fifth Amendment to
Lease as of the date first hereinabove written.



LANDLORD:                                   TENANT:

SCHNITZER INVESTMENT CORP.                  SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.


By:  Linda M. Wakefield                     By: Terry Glucoft
     ---------------------                      ---------------------
     Linda Wakefield
     Vice President                         Title: V.P.
                                                   ------------------
§ 10.37 Claim of widow not living with veteran at time of veteran's death. If a veteran and widow were not living together at the time of the death of the veteran the widow will be required to establish: ( a ) That the living apart was not due to her willful act, and
( b ) Actual dependency upon the veteran at the time of his death or at any time thereafter and before January 2, 1935. ( 1 ) A determination of what shall constitute a willful act, as used in section 602(a) of the Act, as amended, will be made upon consideration of all facts relating to such act and upon such investigation of such facts as may be deemed warranted. For the purpose of this section, the fact that a veteran lived apart from the widow because of any act by the widow involving desertion or moral turpitude will be construed as the willful act of the widow. Cause of separation and time and duration of separation at the time of the death of the veteran shall be taken into consideration in determining a willful act.
( 2 ) A determination of the existence of actual dependency will be made under the criteria set forth in §§ 10.32 and 10.33 with respect to dependency of a mother or father.
#### § 4.19 Age in service-connected claims.

Age may not be considered as a factor in evaluating service-connected disability; and unemployability, in service-connected claims, associated with advancing age or intercurrent disability, may not be used as a basis for a total disability rating. Age, as such, is a factor only in evaluations of disability not resulting from service, *i.e.*, for the purposes of pension.

[29 FR 6718, May 22, 1964, as amended at 43 FR 45349, Oct. 2, 1978]
#### § 46.8 Independent contractors.

Independent contractors acting on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs are subject to the National Practitioner Data Bank reporting provisions of this part. In the following circumstances, VA will provide the contractor with notice that a report of a clinical privileges action will be filed with the National Practitioner Data Bank with a copy with the State Licensing Board in the State(s) in which the contractor is licensed and in which the facility is located: where VA terminates a contract for possible incompetence or improper professional conduct, thereby automatically revoking the contractor's clinical privileges, or where the contractor terminates the contract, thereby surrendering clinical privileges, either while under investigation relating to possible incompetence or improper professional conduct or in return for not conducting such an investigation or proceeding.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5705)
#### § 61.0 Purpose.

This part implements the VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program which consists of the following components: capital grants, per diem, special need capital and non-capital grants, and technical assistance grants.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2001, 2002, 2011, 2012, 2061, 2064)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.9 Action by owner.

(a) *Entire interest.* An owner of the entire interest in an application or patent involved in a Board proceeding may act in the proceeding to the exclusion of the inventor (*see* §§ 3.71 and 3.73 of this title).

(b) *Part interest.* An owner of a part interest in an application or patent involved in a Board proceeding may petition to act in the proceeding to the exclusion of an inventor or a co-owner. The petition must show the inability or refusal of an inventor or co-owner to prosecute the proceeding or other cause why it is in the interest of justice to permit the owner of a part interest to act in the proceeding. An order granting the petition may set conditions on the actions of the parties during the proceeding.

[69 FR 50003, Aug. 12, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 48826, Aug. 14, 2012]
From: Phil Hopkinson [mailto:phopkinson@hvolt.com] 

Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 2:42 PM 

To: Caskey, John; Brian Coffey; Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; 

Bruce Smith; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Silcox, Clark; 

Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg 

Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; 

Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. 

Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; 

Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard Parker; Rick Anderson; Rob 

Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve 

Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Cc: Bob Smith (bsmith@federalpacific.com); (rjstahara@centralmoloneyinc.com); Ali Ghafourian 

(aghafourian@ermco-eci.com); Ned Brush (Ned.efbrush@gmail.com); Dave Brender 

(dbrender@cda.copper.org); jay.ballard@schneider-electric.com; Kenneth.Harden@schneiderelectric.com; Tom Patzner (thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com); Steve Nizinski 

Subject: RE: Distribution Transformer Loading 

Good afternoon Richard and all: 

Attached, you will find my analysis of distribution transformer loading, both medium voltage 

and low voltage, that may prove to be useful for the negotiations. I plan to attend this week’s 

meetings and would be happy to explain this report if it would add value. 

I would also be glad to explain my earlier report on medium voltage distribution transformer 

selling prices to the end user versus efficiency. 

Thanks in advance, 

Phil 

Philip J Hopkinson, PE 

President & CEO HVOLT Inc. 

3704 High Ridge Rd. 

Charlotte, NC 28270 

phopkinson@hvolt.com

Ph 704-846-3290 

Fx 704-845-2520 

Cell 704-236-3320 

www.hvolt.com
#### DRAKE V. THE STATE.

(Decided Feb. 8, 1912.)

Appeal from Madison Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. James H. Ballentine.

Betts & Betts, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Abated by death of appellant.
§ 1.991 Procedures for salary offset: when deductions may begin. ( a ) Deductions to liquidate an employee's debt will be by the method and in the amount stated in the notice to collect from the employee's current pay as modified by a written decision issued under § 1.982 or § 1.988, or parts 19 and 20 or by written agreement between the employee and the VA under § 1.990.
( b ) If the employee filed a request for a hearing as provided by § 1.984 before the expiration of the period provided for in that section, deductions will not begin until after the hearing official or administrative law judge has provided the employee with a hearing, and has rendered a final written decision.
( c ) If the employee failed to file a timely request for a hearing, deductions will begin on the date specified in the notice of intention to offset, unless a hearing is granted pursuant to § 1.984(b).
( d ) If an employee retires, resigns, or his or her employment ends before collection of the amount of the indebtedness is completed, the remaining indebtedness will be collected according to procedures for administrative offset (*see* 5 CFR 831.1801 through 831.1808, 31 CFR 901.3, and 38 CFR 1.912).
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
[52 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 62203, Oct. 25, 2004]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4255 Loans for the acquisition of a lot. ( a ) A loan to finance all or part of the cost of acquisition by the veteran of a lot on which to place a manufactured home owned by the veteran shall be eligible for guaranty, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The veteran will acquire title to such lot that conforms to the requirements of § 36.4253(a),
( 2 ) The loan is secured as required by § 36.4253(d),
( 3 ) The lot is determined by the Secretary to be an acceptable manufactured homesite pursuant to § 36.4208,
( 4 ) The portion of the loan allocated to acquisition of the lot does not exceed the reasonable value of the lot as determined by the Secretary,
( 5 ) The loan conforms otherwise to the requirements of the § 36.4200 series.
( b ) The cost of lot acquisition which will not be paid from the proceeds of the loan must be paid by the veteran in cash from his or her own resources.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, acquisition of a manufactured home lot includes: ( 1 ) The refinancing of the balance owed by the veteran as purchaser under an existing real estate installment contract, and
( 2 ) The refinancing of existing mortgage loans or other liens which are secured of record on a manufactured home lot owned by the veteran.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and 3712(g))
[40 FR 13215, Mar. 25, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 40231, Sept. 6, 1983]
§ 21.8032 Evaluations. ( a ) *Scope and nature of evaluation.* The scope and nature of the evaluation under this program will be comparable to an evaluation of the reasonable feasibility of achieving a vocational goal for a veteran under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 and §§ 21.50(b)(3) and 21.53(b) and (d). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(a), 1814)
( b ) *Specific services to determine the reasonable feasibility of achieving a vocational goal.* As a part of the evaluation of reasonable feasibility of achieving a vocational goal, VA may provide the following specific services, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Assessment of feasibility by a CP or VRC;
( 2 ) Review of feasibility assessment and of need for special services by the Vocational Rehabilitation Panel;
( 3 ) Provision of medical, testing, and other diagnostic services to ascertain the child's capacity for training and employment; and
( 4 ) Evaluation of employability by professional staff of an educational or rehabilitation facility, for a period not to exceed 30 days. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(a), 1814)
( c ) *Responsibility for evaluation.* A CP or VRC will make all determinations as to the reasonable feasibility of achieving a vocational goal.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(a), (b), 1814)
[67 FR 72565, Dec. 6, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 14043, Mar. 26, 2007]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1120

DAVID M. KISSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD M. KREMEN, Defendant - Appellee, and DK&R COMPANY, Debtor - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (1:05- cv-2414-PJM; 1-05-cv-03458-PJM; 1:05-cv-02641-PJM) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY, US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David M. Kissi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his amended motion to reconsider an award of compensation and expenses to the trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kissi v. Kremen , Nos. 1:05-cv-2414-PJM; 1:05-cv03458-PJM; 1:05-cv-02641-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 12, 2005). We deny Kissi’s motions for a change of venue, to consolidate cases, and to remand, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverado Gold
Mines, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending
August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Garry L. AnselmoGarry L.
Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer

October 20, 2008

---
DPN



Exhibit 4.2

DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$100,000



In consideration of receiving a loan of US$100,000, the undersigned Manu Forti Group Inc., of 3990 Warren Way, Reno, Nevada, USA, 89509, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to Steve McMannaman of Maison Houcarde, Gouze, Orthez, France, 64300, the sum of US$100,000, without interest, payable on demand. 

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 15th day of September, 2003.


 

	
/s/ "Tina Miller"
	
/s/ "Gordon Samson"

	
Tina Miller
	
Gordon Samson

	
Signature of Witness
	
Manu Forti Group Inc.
§ 38.745 Disposition of applications. ( a ) *Disposition of applications.* Upon review of an application and dependent on availability of funds, VA will: ( 1 ) Approve the application for funding, in whole or in part, for such amount of funds, and subject to such conditions that VA deems necessary or desirable;
( 2 ) Determine that the application is of acceptable quality for funding, in that it meets minimum criteria, but disapprove the application for funding because it does not rank sufficiently high in relation to other applications to qualify for an award based on the level of funding available, or for another reason as provided in the decision document; or
( 3 ) Defer action on the application for such reasons as lack of funds or a need for further review.
( b ) *Notification of disposition.* VA will notify the applicant in writing of the disposition of the application. A signed grant agreement form, as defined in § 38.755, will be issued to the applicant of an approved application.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Christopher Abel Board Certified Criminal Law Specialist 2609 Sagebrush Drive
Suite 202 Flower Mound, Texas 75028 972-584-7837(office) 972-947-3813(fax)
chris@flowermoundcriminaldefense.com
www.flowermoundcriminaldefense.com

December 22, 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals Post Office Box 12308, Capital Station Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Dewan Morgan v. State of Texas
CCA No. PD-0758 -15 Trial Court Case No. F-2013 -1704 -C

Dear Mr. Acosta:

Pursuant to this Court ’ s letter dated December 16, 2015, oral argument will be permitted in the above-referenced cause. Accordingly, this correspondence will confirm that I will present oral argument to the Court on January 13, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.

Sincerely,

/s/ Chris Abel
Chris Abel
Bar No. 24043516 Attorney for Appellant

CA /kwr PD-0758-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/22/2015 11:35:01 AM Accepted 12/22/2015 11:50:31 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
ForeFlight Current Weather VFR Airspace Outside Class B Weather Within Personal Minimums Airports Proximity and Type/Permission Crew Briefing Flight Plan - Emg. Procedures Flight Area Secure UAS Flight BatteryConnect Weather VFR GPS Satellites Acquired Weather Within Personal Minimums Camera Gimbal Test Motion Op Area Safe for Flight Ops iOS-Camera Join WiFi Network iOS-Camera Power On Flight Mode Set to GPS IMSAFE PIC OK for Flight? Motors Start Weather Above Personal Minimums Flight Controls Check Crew Briefing Stay Clear Director/Crew Announce Ready for Flight UAS Visual CheckScrews Wire, etc... Secure

UAS Flight BatteryCharged and Tested Controller BatteriesCharged and Tested Clock Start Camera Batteries Charged and Tested Power Full Power for quick clearance UAS Battery AlarmInstalled and Set Clock Monitor UAS Remote Power on LED Alarm Monitor UAS Remote Verify Battery Level Aural Alarm Monotor and RTB UAS Flight BatteryConnect GPS Satellites Acquired UAS Compass Calibrated Camera Gimbal Test Motion Director/Crew Announce Returning/Caution Camera Filter Set Landing Area Clear Camera Power on Approach Clear of Crew and Obstacles Camera WiFi on iOS-Camera Join WiFi Network iOS-Camera Set Mode iOS-Camera Power Off iOS-Camera Test Recording/Playback UAS Flight BatteryDisconnect iOS-Camera Power Off UAS Controller Power Off Flight Mode Set to GPS Motors Start Flight Controls Check Motors Stop UAS Flight BatteryDisconnect UAS Remote Power Off 

# SHUT DOWN MOTOR START UAS-Multi-Rotor Checklist



# BEFORE FLIGHT

APPROACH & LANDING TAKEOFF UAS-Multi-Rotor Checklist 

# SITE ASSESSMENT
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.374 Effect of diagnosis of active tuberculosis. ( a ) *Service diagnosis.* Service department diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis will be accepted unless a board of medical examiners, Clinic Director or Chief, Outpatient Service certifies, after considering all the evidence, including the favoring or opposing tuberculosis and activity, that such diagnosis was incorrect. Doubtful cases may be referred to the Chief Medical Director in Central Office.
( b ) *Department of Veterans Affairs diagnosis.* Diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis by the medical authorities of the Department of Veterans Affairs as the result of examination, observation, or treatment will be accepted for rating purposes. Reference to the Clinic Director or Chief, Outpatient Service, will be in order in questionable cases and, if necessary, to the Chief Medical Director in Central Office.
( c ) *Private physician's diagnosis.* Diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis by private physicians on the basis of their examination, observation or treatment will not be accepted to show the disease was initially manifested after discharge from active service unless confirmed by acceptable clinical, X-ray or laboratory studies, or by findings of active tuberculosis based upon acceptable hospital observation or treatment.
[26 FR 1591, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 27 FR 6387, July 6, 1962; 33 FR 16275, Nov. 6, 1968; 43 FR 45348, Oct. 2, 1978]
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Funding Opportunities
- Research and Resources
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Leadership – Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration

# 						Leadership – Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration					

6											Items									

          -  							Noyes, Julieta Valls						Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 
          -  							Youth, Marta Costanzo						Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 
          -  							Cross, Sarah						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 
          -  							Campbell, Elizabeth H.						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 
          -  							Turner, Scott C. 						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 
          -  							Wynne, Janine 						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 

Back to Top