alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000729976
<NAME>                        ENCIBAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,621
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,904
<OTHER-SE>                                    (5,525)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.201 Copies and certified copies.

(a) Non-certified copies of trademark registrations and of any trademark records or trademark documents within the jurisdiction of the Office and open to the public, will be furnished by the Office to any person entitled thereto, upon payment of the appropriate fee required by § 2.6.

(b) Certified copies of trademark registrations and of any trademark records or trademark documents within the jurisdiction of the Office and open to the public will be authenticated by the seal of the Office and certified by the Director, or in his or her name attested by an officer of the Office authorized by the Director, upon payment of the fee required by § 2.6.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 49389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 1, 2009, 11 a.m. to 
October 1, 2009, 12 p.m., One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington 
Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the Federal 
Register on September 15, 2009, 74 FR 47262-47264.
    The meeting was cancelled due to administration problems.

    Dated: September 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23238 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 93.310 Institutional investigation. Institutions conducting research misconduct investigations must: ( a ) *Time.* Begin the investigation within 30 days after determining that an investigation is warranted.
( b ) *Notice to ORI.* Notify the ORI Director of the decision to begin an investigation on or before the date the investigation begins and provide an inquiry report that meets the requirements of § 93.307 and § 93.309.
( c ) *Notice to the respondent.* Notify the respondent in writing of the allegations within a reasonable amount of time after determining that an investigation is warranted, but before the investigation begins. The institution must give the respondent written notice of any new allegations of research misconduct within a reasonable amount of time of deciding to pursue allegations not addressed during the inquiry or in the initial notice of investigation.
( d ) *Custody of the records.* To the extent they have not already done so at the allegation or inquiry stages, take all reasonable and practical steps to obtain custody of all the research records and evidence needed to conduct the research misconduct proceeding, inventory the records and evidence, and sequester them in a secure manner, except that where the research records or evidence encompass scientific instruments shared by a number of users, custody may be limited to copies of the data or evidence on such instruments, so long as those copies are substantially equivalent to the evidentiary value of the instruments. Whenever possible, the institution must take custody of the records— ( 1 ) Before or at the time the institution notifies the respondent; and
( 2 ) Whenever additional items become known or relevant to the investigation.
( e ) *Documentation.* Use diligent efforts to ensure that the investigation is thorough and sufficiently documented and includes examination of all research records and evidence relevant to reaching a decision on the merits of the allegations.
( f ) *Ensuring a fair investigation.* Take reasonable steps to ensure an impartial and unbiased investigation to the maximum extent practicable, including participation of persons with appropriate scientific expertise who do not have unresolved personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest with those involved with the inquiry or investigation.
( g ) *Interviews.* Interview each respondent, complainant, and any other available person who has been reasonably identified as having information regarding any relevant aspects of the investigation, including witnesses identified by the respondent, and record or transcribe each interview, provide the recording or transcript to the interviewee for correction, and include the recording or transcript in the record of the investigation.
( h ) *Pursue leads.* Pursue diligently all significant issues and leads discovered that are determined relevant to the investigation, including any evidence of additional instances of possible research misconduct, and continue the investigation to completion.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.251 Income of parents; dependency and indemnity compensation. ( a ) *Annual income limitations and rates.* ( 1 ) Dependency and indemnity compensation is not payable to a parent or parents whose annual income exceeds the limitations set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1315 (b), (c), or (d).
( 2 ) Where there is only one parent, and the parent has remarried and is living with his or her spouse, dependency and indemnity compensation will be paid under either the formula in 38 U.S.C. 1315(b)(1) or the formula in 38 U.S.C. 1315(d), whichever will provide the greater monthly rate of dependency and indemnity compensation. The total combined annual income of the parent and spouse will be counted. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1315)
( 3 ) Where the claim is based on service in the Commonwealth Army of the Philippines, or as a guerrilla or as a Philippine Scout under section 14, Pub. L. 190, 79th Congress, the income limitation will be at a rate of $0.50 for each dollar. See § 3.100(b). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107)
( 4 ) If the remarriage of a parent has been terminated, or the parent is separated from his or her spouse, the rate of dependency and indemnity compensation for the parent will be that which would be payable if there were one parent alone or two parents not living together, whichever is applicable.
( 5 ) Where there are two parents living and only one parent has filed claim, the rate of dependency and indemnity compensation will be that which would be payable if both parents had filed claim.
( b ) *Basic rule.* Payments of any kind or from any source will be counted as income unless specifically excluded. Income will be counted for the calendar year in which it is received and total income for the full calendar year will be considered except as provided in § 3.260.
[28 FR 29, Jan. 1, 1963, as amended at 31 FR 14455, Nov. 10, 1966; 40 FR 16065, Apr. 9, 1975; 41 FR 15411, Apr. 13, 1976; 60 FR 18355, Apr. 11, 1995]
§ 21.6420 Coordination with the Veterans Service Center. It is the responsibility of the VR&E Division to inform the Veterans Service Center in writing of the following changes in the veteran's circumstances contained in the following paragraphs. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524, Pub. L. 101-237)
( a ) *Evaluation.* ( 1 ) The date an evaluation being provided a veteran under age 45, who is required to participate in such evaluation, is suspended because of unsatisfactory conduct or cooperation; and
( 2 ) The date the evaluation is resumed. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524, Pub. L. 101-237)
( b ) *Income information.* Any information relating to income from work or training which may affect the veteran's continued entitlement to pension, including participation in: ( 1 ) A work adjustment program, incentive or therapeutic work program, vocational training in a rehabilitation facility, or employment in a rehabilitation facility or sheltered workshop;
( 2 ) On-job training;
( 3 ) The work portion of a cooperative or combination program;
( 4 ) Internships; and
( 5 ) Full- or part-time employment. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524)
( c ) *Dependency changes.* Information regarding dependency changes if the case manager learns of such changes in the normal course of performing his or her duties. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524)
( d ) *Information to determine if the veteran's permanent and total disability rating is protected under § 3.343 .* The information provided by the case manager includes: ( 1 ) The employment was within the scope of the vocational goal identified in the veteran's individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation, or in a related field, and the employment secured by the veteran requires the use of the training or services furnished under the rehabilitation plan.
( 2 ) Employment was secured not later than one year after the date the veteran's eligibility for counseling expired. A veteran's eligibility for counseling expires on the date employment services are terminated by VA or the veteran completes rehabilitation to the point of employability and terminates program participation, whichever is later; and
( 3 ) The veteran maintained his or her employment for 12 consecutive months.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524, Pub. L. 101-237)
[53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 21449, May 9, 1991; 71 FR 28586, May 17, 2006]
#### § 23.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 38 CFR 18.6 through 18.11.

[65 FR 52890, Aug. 30, 2000]
#### Pete LOWREY Jr. v. Lucy LOWREY

76-75

538 S.W. 2d 36

Opinion delivered July 6, 1976

*William R. Wilson, Jr.,*P.A., for appellant.

*Daggett, Daggett & Van Dover,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in awarding appellee Lucy Lowrey, as part of her property rights under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Repl. 1962), a one-third interest in a pending Jones Act claim of appellant Pete Lowrey, Jr. The trial court, upon the award of divorce to appellee, awarded “as her statutory interest, one-third of all proceeds derived either by judgment or settlement from the suit of Pete Lowrey, Jr. v. Canal Barge Lines Inc. ” and directed appellant to execute an assignment.

We reverse the action of the trial court for the reasons set forth in *Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company*v. *Wright Oil Company, Inc.,*248 Ark. 803, 454 S.W. 2d 69 (1970) and *Fenney*v. *Fenney,*259 Ark. 858, 537 S.W. 2d 367 (1976). See also *In re Schmelzer,*350 F. Supp. 429 (S.D. Ohio 1972). Under those authorities an unliquidated personal injury claim does not constitute personal property for purposes of assignment or by operation of law in matters of bankruptcy. Consequently, we conclude that such a personal injury claim does not constitute personal property within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214.

Appellee’s suggestion that the assignability of the unli*129quidated personal injury claim was raised for the first time on appeal is not supported by the record.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment not inconsistent herewith.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, D. Gary McRae, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.    Date: June 14, 2005 /s/ D. Gary McRae              D. Gary McRae President and CEO
23
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7357

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. FRANKLIN ROBBS, a/k/a Frankie Boo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. ( 3:12

- cr - 00188

- FDW

- 21 ; 3:16

- cv 00538

- FDW )

Submitted : February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Franklin Robbs , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Kent , Asheville, North Carolina, Jill Westmoreland Rose , Daniel Steven Ryan , Kevin Zolot , OFFICE OF T HE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Franklin Robbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) mot ion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deba table, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robbs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifi cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.52

 

Ninth Amendment

To The Exclusive Ragnarok Online License and Distribution Agreement

 

This AMENDMENT (“this Amendment”) is made and entered into on this 1st of January, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “Amendment Date”) by and between Gravity Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Licensor”) and Gravity Interactive, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Licensee”).

 

RECITALS:

 

WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee (“Parties” collectively) entered into the Exclusive Ragnarok Online License and Distribution Agreement (“the Original Agreement”), dated January 1st, 2006.

 

WHEREAS, the Parties has entered into the amendments to the Original Agreement (“Amendments”)  eight times to amend certain terms and conditions of the Original Agreement(the Original Agreement amended by Amendments until now is hereinafter referred to as “The Agreement”) ;

 

WHEREAS, both Parties to The Agreement now desire to amend The Agreement as set forth below;

 

AGREEMENT

 

NOW; THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, Licensor and Licensee agree as follows:

 

1. Term Extension of the Agreement

 

Parties agreed to extend the Agreement for Two (2) years (“Fifth Renewed Term”) from the expiration date with conditions stated below in this Amendment. The newly extended term of the Agreement shall be from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016.

 

2. Territory

 

The Article 1.12 of The Agreement shall be amended as follows :

 

1











 

1.12     “Territory” shall mean the following territories :

(a) United States of America

(b) Canada

(c) Australia

(d) New Zealand

(e) India

(f) Singapore

(g) Malaysia

(h) Middle East and North Africa region(UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Lebanon, Mauritania, Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia)

(i) Philippines

 

3.     Effective Date

 

All the Articles of The Agreement amended by this Amendment shall be effective and applicable on and from the Amendment Date defined above, and any of them shall not be  construed or regarded to be retroactively effective.

 

4.     Continuing Effectiveness of the Agreement

 

Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants, or agreements contained in The Agreement, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year first above-written.

 

 

	
GRAVITY CO., LTD.
    	
Gravity Interactive Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
Name: Hyun Chul Park
    	
Name: Kitamura   Yoshinori
    
	
Title: CEO
    	
Title: CEO
    
	
Date:
    	
Date:
    


 

2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2005


/s/ Brian T. Beckwith
--------------------------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
Chief Executive Officer

                                        25