### Name:

Title: Company: Sign Date: Name: Title: Company: Sign Date: Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 1 of 13

### Facility Information:

Enter Plant Name (as reported U.S. DOE/EI Enter physical Address

Enter physical city Contact: Person to contact for more detail Phone: Of above person Fax: Of above person Email: Of above person Testing Company: Name of primary testing organization US postal address of above

US postal address of abov Contact: Field test leader Phone: Of above person Fax: Of above person Email: Of above person

Air Permit Number: Enter your facilities ORIS Number here Permitted Source ID/Name: Enter the Boiler ID of the tested boiler (left) SJ9 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: N/A Target Process Test Rate N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: This description should describe the process and associated controls to differentiate this facility from, or document similarity with others of same SCC. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: Enter ARS ID FRS #: Enter FRS ID

SCC / Description 10100404 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Residual Oil - Grade 6 Oil: Tangential Firing

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Stack Exit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location % H2O Method 1 - 4 3 180 0 Stack Exit Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0 Stack Exit Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0 Stack Exit 2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 2 of 131,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0

Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit OCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit OCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Other TCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other PeCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HxCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HpCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other TCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other PeCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HxCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HpCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Total Dioxins Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total Furans Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-

HxCB (PCBs156/157) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit
2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB

(PCB189) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit

Total PCBs Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total TEQ Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total organic compounds

(TOC) as Propane Method 25A 3 120 0 Stack Exit
Hydrogen Chloride Method 26 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0 Stack Exit Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Organic Condensible

Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 3 of 13

### The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. In this section, identify the promulgation date of any specified test method that you use for determining the procedures followed. This field is also used to document any modifications that are necessary to conduct the emissions test if they are outside the requirements of the cited method. If this modification was approved verbally by a regulatory agency, the name and date of approval should be included. Written formal approval should be attached to this file using the "Attach File" button. Test procedures that are different from those published in the Federal Register should be attached using the "Attach File" button.

Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Total Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 240 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 240 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 480 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 480 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 Stack Exit Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Organic Condensible

Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate Method 5 3 240 0 Stack Exit Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 180 0 Stack Exit Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 180 0 Stack Exit



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 4 of 13

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Stack Exit - Method 23 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 10/15/2010 10/16/2010 10/17/2010 Run Start Time 9:04:00 AM 8:55:00 AM Run Finish Time 5:04:00 PM 5:10:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 211.617 212.507 212.062 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.70 0.00 5.350 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.000 Carbon Dioxide, % 10.5 10.3 10.400 Oxygen, % 7.8 8.1 7.950 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 290.13 290.38 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0.0 0.0 0.000 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 0.0 0.0 0.000 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.7 90.5 95.600 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9190 9190 0 6,126.667 Fw 10320 10320 0 6,880.000 Fc 1420 1420 0 946.667



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 5 of 13

### Location Stack Exit - Method 29 Average

Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Fw Fc



### Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Fw Fc



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 6 of 13

### Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Stack Exit - Method 23 Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0000000025 0 0 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 #Num! ng/dscm #Num! ng/dscm@7%O2 #Num!



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 7 of 13

### Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Heat Input 0 Million Btus 0 

### 1 Average Heat Input 992 MMBtu/hr 0 1 Steam Output 718 1000 lb steam/hr 0 1 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 

### 1 Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 1 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 1 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 

### 1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 0 dscfm 0 1 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 1 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 0 pH 0 

### 1 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0 1 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0



### 1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 0 % 0 1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 0 % 0 1 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 

### 1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 1 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 1 Standard Pressure 0 atm 0 

### 1 Standard Temperature 0 Deg F 0 1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 92 MW 0 1 Unit Net Electric Generation 0 MWh 0 

### 2 Heat Input 0 Million Btus 0 2 Average Heat Input 992 MMBtu/hr 0 2 Steam Output 718 1000 lb steam/hr 0 

### 2 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 2 Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 2 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 

### 2 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 2 Flue Gas Flow Rate 0 dscfm 0 2 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 

### 2 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 0 pH 0 2 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 8 of 13

### APCD Run Data

2 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0



### 2 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 0 % 0 2 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 0 % 0 

### 2 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 2 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 2 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 

### 2 Standard Pressure 0 atm 0 2 Standard Temperature 0 Deg F 0 2 Unit Gross Electrical Output 92 MW 0 

### 2 Unit Net Electric Generation 0 MWh 0 3 Heat Input 0 Million Btus 0 3 Average Heat Input 992 MMBtu/hr 0 

### 3 Steam Output 718 1000 lb steam/hr 0 3 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 3 Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 

### 3 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 3 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 3 Flue Gas Flow Rate 0 dscfm 0 

### 3 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 3 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 0 pH 0 3 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0 

### 3 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0

3 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 0 % 0 

### 3 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 0 % 0 3 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 3 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 

### 3 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 3 Standard Pressure 0 atm 0 3 Standard Temperature 0 Deg F 0 

### 3 Unit Gross Electrical Output 92 MW 0 3 Unit Net Electric Generation 0 MWh 0



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 List all emissions control devices in order of 0 0



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 9 of 13

### Process Lab Run Data

process flow. Choose from 

### 1 drop down lists. If not on list add description and provide detailed 0 0

1 desription in section 5a. 0 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments 

### 1 See 4b Comments. 0

Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 10 of 13

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Stack Exit - Method 23 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 10/15/2010 10/16/2010 10/17/2010 Run Start Time 9:04:00 AM 8:55:00 AM Run Finish Time 5:04:00 PM 5:10:00 PM Net Traversing Points 49 49 1 Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.18 0.18 0.180 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.8 29.75 29.775 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 0.62 0.64 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 223.227 224.051 0.000 149.093 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 87.25 86.08 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 211.617 212.507 212.062 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 538.6 0 0 179.533 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 25.35 0.00 0.00 8.450 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.70 0.00 5.350 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.893 1 0.947 Carbon Dioxide, % 10.5 10.3 10.400 Oxygen, % 7.8 8.1 7.950 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 81.7 81.6 81.650 Fuel Factor 1.25 1.24 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.99 29.97 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.71 29.97 29.340 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 1 1 1.000 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.87 29.82 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 290.13 290.38 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.9604088321 41769 0.999856844

071748 0.980
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 65.82 65.80 65.810 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0.0 0.0 0.000 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 0.0 0.0 0.000 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.7 90.5 95.600 Percent Excess Air, % 56.6 60.3 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9190 9190 0 6,126.667 Round Duct Diameter, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10320 10320 0 6,880.000 Fc 1420 1420 0 946.667



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 11 of 13

### Location Stack Exit - Method 29 Average

Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 12 of 13

### Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28 Average

Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 13 of 13