alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.502 Processing of prior art citations during an *ex parte* reexamination proceeding.

Citations by the patent owner under § 1.555 and by an *ex parte* reexamination requester under either § 1.510 or § 1.535 will be entered in the reexamination file during a reexamination proceeding. The entry in the patent file of citations submitted after the date of an order to reexamine pursuant to § 1.525 by persons other than the patent owner, or an *ex parte* reexamination requester under either § 1.510 or § 1.535, will be delayed until the reexamination proceeding has been concluded by the issuance and publication of a reexamination certificate. See § 1.902 for processing of prior art citations in patent and reexamination files during an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding filed under § 1.913.

[72 FR 18905, Apr. 16, 2007]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 428 -CV

Cha r lie Ra y Ta ylo r , A ppe lla nt

v. State of Texas , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-07- 0010 46 , HO NORAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Charlie Ray

Taylor has filed a

n aff idavit of indige nce a

nd a re ques t f

o r th e p r e paration
o f t h e c o u rt re p o rt er ’s re co rd wi t h o u t ad v an ce p ay m en t o f co s t s . W e ha v e f

o rw ar d edt h es e p l ea d i n gs to t he tr ia l c ourt
.

We here by

abate this appeal so that th e t ri al court may consider the aff

idavit of indige nce and Taylor’s reque st to have the rec ord pre pare d without advance pay ment of costs under both Texas Rul e of A

ppellate Proc edure 20.1 and T ex as Civil P rac tice and Re medies Code Annotated se ction 13.003 (West 2002).

The de adline for

filing c ontests to t h e af

fidavit of indig ence is October 13, 2008. Th e re ma ini ngde a dli ne s w ill c on fo rm to t he pr oc e dure s o utl ine d in Tex as Rule of Ap pe llate Procedur e 20.1.2 This appea l will be reinstated when this Court rec eives a supplemental cle rk’s re cord containing any documents relevant to any contest t o the af fidavit as we ll as the trial cour t’s ruling on the af fidavit and whe ther Ta

y lor i s en t i t l ed to a fre e re porter’ s rec ord. See Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.003; Tex. R. App. P . 20.1.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Abated Filed: Oc tober 1, 2008
§ 104.12 Acceptance of service of process. ( a ) Any summons and complaint to be served in person or by registered or certified mail or as otherwise authorized by law on the Office, on the Director, or on an employee in his or her official capacity, shall be served as indicated in § 104.2.
( b ) Any employee of the Office served with a summons and complaint shall immediately notify, and shall deliver the summons and complaint to, the Office of the General Counsel.
( c ) Any employee receiving a summons and complaint shall note on the summons and complaint the date, hour, and place of service and whether service was by hand or by mail.
( d ) When a legal proceeding is brought to hold an employee personally liable in connection with an action taken in the conduct of official business, rather than liable in an official capacity, the employee by law is to be served personally with process. *See Fed. R. Civ. P.* 4(e). An employee sued personally for an action taken in the conduct of official business shall immediately notify and deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to the General Counsel.
( e ) An employee sued personally in connection with official business may be represented by the Department of Justice at its discretion (28 CFR 50.15 and 50.16).
( f ) The Office will only accept service of process for an employee in the employee's official capacity.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.452 Situations when benefits may be apportioned. Veterans benefits may be apportioned: ( a ) If the veteran is not residing with his or her spouse or his or her children and a claim for apportionment is filed for or on behalf of the spouse or children.
( b ) Pending the appointment of a guardian or other fiduciary.
( c ) ( 1 ) Where an incompetent veteran without a fiduciary is receiving institutional care by the United States or a political subdivision, his or her benefit may be apportioned for a spouse or child, or, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2), for a dependent parent, unless such benefit is paid to a spouse (“as wife” or “as husband”) for the use of the veteran and his or her dependents.
( 2 ) Where a married veteran is receiving section 306 or improved pension and the amount payable is reduced under § 3.551(c) because of hospitalization, an apportionment may be paid to the veteran's spouse as provided in § 3.454(b). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a); 5307; 5503(a))
( d ) Where additional compensation is payable on behalf of a parent and the veteran or his or her guardian neglects or refuses to contribute such an amount to the support of the parent the additional compensation will be paid to the parent upon receipt of a claim.

Cross References:
Disappearance of veteran. *See* § 3.656. Reduction because of hospitalization. *See* § 3.551. Penal institutions. *See* § 3.666. [26 FR 7266, Aug. 11, 1961, as amended at 27 FR 6974, July 24, 1962; 40 FR 21724, May 19, 1975; 44 FR 45940, Aug. 6, 1979; 66 FR 48560, Sept. 21, 2001; 68 FR 34542, June 10, 2003; 83 FR 32738, July 13, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4336 Oversight of servicing. ( a ) Subject to notice and opportunity for a hearing, whenever the Secretary finds that any servicer has failed to maintain adequate loan accounting records, or to demonstrate proper ability to service loans adequately or to exercise proper credit judgment or has willfully or negligently engaged in practices otherwise detrimental to the interest of veterans or of the Government, the Secretary may refuse either temporarily or permanently to guarantee or insure any loans made by such servicer and may bar such servicer from servicing or acquiring guaranteed loans.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, but subject to § 36.4328, the Secretary will not refuse to pay a guaranty or insurance claim on a guaranteed loan theretofore entered into in good faith between a veteran and such servicer.
( c ) The Secretary may also refuse either temporarily or permanently to guarantee or insure any loans made by a lender or holder suspended, debarred, denied, or otherwise restricted from participation in FHA's insurance programs pursuant to a determination of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0515) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703, 3704(d), 3720)
[86 FR 28708, May 28, 2021]
- Our Ocean Home
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOur Ocean Conference...Remarks and Releases

# 						Remarks and Releases – Our Ocean Conference					

26 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerJennifer R. LittlejohnJohn KerryMaxine  BurkettMonica Medina

Select a LocationAustraliaCanadaChileColombiaCosta RicaEgyptFijiFranceGreeceIndonesiaJapanKenyaMaltaPalauPanamaPortugalRomaniaSeychellesSri LankaThailandUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesVietnam

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentFact SheetMedia NoteOther U.S. Government ReleaseRemarksSpecial Briefing via TelephoneUSAID Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeAsia Pacific Media HubBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Global ChangeOffice of Marine ConservationOffice of Ocean and Polar AffairsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    Fact Sheet  		United States Announces $508 Million to Protect Our Ocean	  April 17, 2024 
          -    Remarks  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Head of Delegation Remarks at Our Ocean Conference	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnApril 16, 2024Athens, Greece 
          -    Media Note  		U.S. Delegation to the Ninth Our Ocean Conference	  April 11, 2024 
          -    Remarks  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Remarks at Thai NGO Roundtable on Plastic Pollution and Marine Conservation 	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnJune 23, 2023 
          -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		World Ocean Day 2023:  Celebrating Our Victories, Planning for Our Future 	  Maxine  BurkettJune 8, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		United States Announces $800 Million in International Commitments for Protecting Our Ocean	  March 8, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S Delegation Announced $6 billion USD in Commitments to Address Threats to Our Ocean, Doubling Last Year’s Pledge	  March 3, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Delegation Announced 6 Billion USD in Commitments to Address Threats to Our Ocean, Doubling Last Year’s Pledge at Eighth Our Ocean Conference	  March 3, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		The United States Announces the First Cohort of Countries to Endorse the Ocean Conservation Pledge at COP27	  November 16, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to Greece, Indonesia, and Vietnam	  August 26, 2022 

123next page

Back to Top
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000048420-NOV-201211:17 AM
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverado Gold
Mines, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending May
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ Garry L. Anselmo       
| | ---------------------------
| | Garry L. Anselmo           
| | Principal Financial Officer
| |                            
| | July 15, 2008              

---
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.305 Direct service connection; peacetime service before January 1, 1947. ( a ) *General.* The basic considerations relating to service connection are stated in § 3.303. The criteria in this section apply only to disabilities which may have resulted from service other than in a period of war before January 1, 1947.
( b ) *Presumption of soundness.* A peacetime veteran who has had active, continuous service of 6 months or more will be considered to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted and enrolled for service, except as to defects, infirmities or disorders noted at the time thereof, or where evidence or medical judgment, as distinguished from medical fact and principles, establishes that an injury or disease preexisted service. Any evidence acceptable as competent to indicate the time of existence or inception of the condition may be considered. Determinations based on medical judgment will take cognizance of the time of inception or manifestation of disease or injury following entrance into service, as shown by proper service authorities in service records, entries or reports. Such records will be accorded reasonable weight in consideration of other evidence and sound medical reasoning. Opinions may be solicited from Department of Veterans Affairs medical authorities when considered necessary.
( c ) *Campaigns and expeditions.* In considering claims of veterans who engaged in combat during campaigns or expeditions satisfactory lay or other evidence of incurrence or aggravation in such combat of an injury or disease, if consistent with the circumstances, conditions or hardships of such service will be accepted as sufficient proof of service connection, even when there is no official record of incurrence or aggravation. Service connection for such injury or disease may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
[26 FR 1580, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 28 FR 3088, Mar. 29, 1963; 39 FR 34530, Sept. 26, 1974]
§ 21.5066 Suspension of participation. An individual may suspend participation in the program without disenrolling. If the individual suspends participation, he or she may resume participation at any time thereafter while on active duty. ( a ) An individual may suspend participation any time after 12 months of participation.
( b ) An individual who has participated for less than 12 consecutive months may not suspend unless the Secretary of Defense determines that the reason for the suspension is due to a personal hardship.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3221)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2022

No. 04-21-00313-CR

David GREENWOOD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CRW1707142

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is due on January 31, 2022. On January 26, 2022, appellant filed a 

second unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief. The motion is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due no later than March 2, 2022.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      November 7, 2008





BY:
            /s/
                Colin DunnColin
                Dunn, Vice President ofFinance
#### Willie Fred PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20262.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 24, 1963.

*18John Patrick Keegan, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Gene S. Palmisano, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Louis C. LaCour, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and DE VANE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the denial of a motion under Section 2255 for vacation of the sentence of conviction, it appears that upon the advice of counsel appellant entered a plea of guilty. There being no attack as to the good faith of counsel representing him, the Court is of the view that the plea of guilty under the circumstances constituted a waiver as to any defects which appellant now seeks to raise as to the proceedings touching on his purported confession to the officers prior to his arraignment and plea of guilty.

The judgment is

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00473-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.I.E.C.H. and L.J.C.H.-C., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01727

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is 

AFFIRMED, and appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.

We order that no costs be assessed against the appellant because he is indigent.

SIGNED March 23, 2022.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
# *National Exposure**Report* Home Page

Biomonitoring Data Tables for Environmental Chemicals
Apr. 29, 2024

What's New
May 13, 2024

What's New Archives
May 13, 2024

## For Everyone

About the *National Exposure Report*

* Report *
May 13, 2024

About the Biomonitoring Data Tables
May 13, 2024

Selected Highlights
                    - 
What's New
The latest updates to the National Exposure Report May 13, 2024
                    - 
About the Chemicals
About the ChemicalsMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Interpretation of the Data
Interpretation of the DataMay 13, 2024
                    - 
*Report* Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked QuestionsMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Resources
Resources to help you with the National Exposure ReportMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Suggested Citation
How to cite the National Exposure ReportMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Site Index
Site IndexMay 13, 2024

## For Public Health Professionals

About the Data
May 13, 2024

About the Laboratory Analysis
May 13, 2024

Selected Highlights
                    - 
Resources
Resources to help you with the National Exposure ReportMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Data Analysis
Data AnalysisMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Units
Units of measure May 13, 2024
                    - 
Geometric Means
Geometric MeansMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Limit of Detection
Limit of DetectionMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Procedure to Estimate Percentiles
Procedure to Estimate PercentilesMay 13, 2024
                    - 
Site Index
Site IndexMay 13, 2024
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. V. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W.

Olson and Carey Roberts

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00370

- CV

Trial court case number: 1011229

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: November 13, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant, Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc.

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/

__ Evelyn V. Keyes

_________________________________________

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justi ces Keyes, Higley, and Bland

Date: December 19 , 2013
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the quarterly report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 2, 2005

/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 2, 2005/s/ Matthew T. Farrell
Matthew T. Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:
May 7, 2010





By:
                  /s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel
      Bernstein, Presidentand
      Chief Executive Officer