alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.362 Satisfactory conduct and cooperation. ( a ) *General.* The successful development and implementation of a program of rehabilitation services require the full and effective participation of the veteran in the rehabilitation process. ( 1 ) The veteran is responsible for satisfactory conduct and cooperation in developing and implementing a program of rehabilitation services under Chapter 31;
( 2 ) The staff is responsible for insuring satisfactory conduct and cooperation on the veteran's part; and
( 3 ) VA staff shall take required action when the veteran's conduct and cooperation are not satisfactory. (See § 21.364)
( b ) *VA responsibility.* VA shall make a reasonable effort to inform the veteran and assure his or her understanding of: ( 1 ) The services and assistance which may be provided under Chapter 31 to help the veteran maintain satisfactory cooperation and conduct and to cope with problems directly related to the rehabilitation process, especially counseling services;
( 2 ) Other services which Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) staff can assist the veteran in securing through non-VA programs; and
( 3 ) The specific responsibilities of the veteran in the process of developing and implementing a program of rehabilitation services, especially the specific responsibility for satisfactory conduct and cooperation.
( c ) *Veteran's responsibility.* A veteran requesting or being provided services under Chapter 31 must: ( 1 ) Cooperate with VA staff in carrying out the initial evaluation and developing a rehabilitation plan;
( 2 ) Arrange a schedule which allows him or her to devote the time needed to attain the goals of the rehabilitation plan;
( 3 ) Seek the assistance of VA staff, as necessary, to resolve problems which affect attainment of the goals of the rehabilitation plan;
( 4 ) Conform to procedures established by VA governing pursuit of a rehabilitation plan including: ( i ) Enrollment and reenrollment in a course;
( ii ) Changing the rate at which a course is pursued;
( iii ) Requesting a leave of absence;
( iv ) Requesting medical care and treatment;
( v ) Securing supplies; and
( vi ) Other applicable procedures.
( 5 ) Conform to the rules and regulations of the training or rehabilitation facility at which services are being provided.
( d ) *Responsibility for determining satisfactory conduct and cooperation.* VR&E staff with case management responsibility in the veteran's case will: ( 1 ) Monitor the veteran's conduct and cooperation as necessary to assure consistency with provisions of paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) Provide assistance which may be authorized under Chapter 31, or for which arrangements may be made under other programs to enable the veteran to maintain satisfactory conduct and cooperation.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3111)
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
<PAGE>
[GMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES LETTERHEAD]                              Exhibit 10.242


                                        July 28, 2003

Meadow Valley Corporation
Attn: Mr. Clinton Tryon Secretary/Treasurer
4411 S. 40th St., Suite D-11
Phoenix, AZ 85040

Re: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL CREDIT

Dear Mr. Tryon,

We finished reviewing the application for commercial credit that you recently
submitted to GMAC. At this time, we are unable to provide you with the financing
accommodations under the terms you were seeking.

However, we can offer you financing accommodations under the following terms:

The lesser of a $750,000 or twenty vehicle line of credit expires July 31,
2004, subject to the following:

     - Approved for Retail/ComTRAC financing for terms up to 60 months with
       $1.00 residual for 60 month financing.

     - Maximum advance limited to 80% of factory invoice.

     - Satisfactory reference from GE Capital Fleet Services must be submitted
       to GMAC.

     - Contracts in the name of Meadow Valley Corporation or contracts in the
       name of Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. with the guaranty of Meadow
       Valley Corporation.

     - Executed Cross Default and Cross Collateralization Agreement by Meadow
       Valley Corporation.

     - Rates to be determined at time of delivery.

If this offer is acceptable to you, please notify us at the above address
within 30 days.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        /s/ John J. Wright

                                        John J. Wright
                                        Commercial Lending Analyst


CC: Todd Carter, Brown & Brown Commercial

IF GMAC TAKES ADVERSE ACTION ON YOUR COMMERCIAL CREDIT APPLICATION, YOU THE
APPLICANT HAVE THE RIGHT TO A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC REASONS FOR
THE DECISION. TO OBTAIN THE STATEMENT, YOU MUST CONTACT GMAC IN WRITING AT THE
ABOVE ADDRESS WITHIN 60 DAYS
<PAGE>
[GMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES LETTERHEAD]

FROM THE DATE OF NOTIFICATION BY GMAC OF THE DECISION. GMAC WILL SEND YOU A
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE REASONS FOR THE ADVERSE ACTION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF
RECEIVING THE REQUEST.

NOTICE: THE FEDERAL EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT PROHIBITS CREDITORS FROM
DISCRIMINATING AGAINST CREDIT APPLICANTS ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, MARITAL STATUS, AGE (PROVIDED THE APPLICANT HAS THE
CAPACITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CONTRACT); BECAUSE ALL OR PART OF THE
APPLICANT'S INCOME DERIVES FROM ANY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAM; OR BECAUSE THE
APPLICANT HAS IN GOOD FAITH EXERCISED ANY RIGHT UNDER THE CONSUMER CREDIT
PROTECTION ACT. THE FEDERAL AGENCY THAT ADMINISTERS COMPLIANCE WITH THIS LAW
CONCERNING THIS CREDITOR IS THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, EQUAL CREDIT
OPPORTUNITY, WASHINGTON, D.C., 20580.
§ 10.33 Determination of dependency. A determination of the existence of the alleged dependency will be made upon consideration of all facts relating to dependency, and upon such investigation of such facts as may be warranted. The following facts as existing at the time of the death of the veteran, or at any time thereafter and on or before January 2, 1935, or where it is established that the veteran is deceased as provided in section 312(a), at the beginning of such 7-year period or at any time thereafter and before the expiration of such period, shall be taken into consideration in determining dependency in a given case: ( a ) Claimant's age.
( b ) Amount contributed to claimant by deceased veteran.
( c ) Value of all real and personal property owned by claimant.
( d ) Total monthly expenses of the claimant and total monthly income.
( e ) The fact that claimant did or did not receive an allotment of pay or allowance during the veteran's military or naval service.
( f ) Incapability of self-support by reason of mental or physical defect.
( g ) Any other fact or facts pertinent to the determination of dependency.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Remembering the Victims of Hizballah Attacks

# 									Remembering the Victims of Hizballah Attacks							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

July 18, 2022

Today brings a moment of somber reflection for the victims and survivors of two heinous Hizballah attacks: the 1994 bombing of the Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina (AMIA), a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and the 2012 attack on a tour bus in Burgas, Bulgaria, carrying Israeli tourists. The two Hizballah attacks, carried out with Iranian support, devastated hundreds of families.

The single deadliest antisemitic attack in more than half a century, the AMIA bombing underscored Hizballah’s global ambitions and is a clear example of Iran’s support of international terrorism. High-level Iranian government officials were directly implicated in the attack, and Hizballah carried it out at the direction of the Iranian regime. While no one responsible for the attack has been brought to justice, the United States believes all Argentines deserve to have those responsible held accountable for this despicable and cowardly attack.

Eighteen years later, Hizballah murdered five Israeli tourists and a Bulgarian bus driver in a bomb attack in Burgas, which also injured 45 Israeli youth traveling on the bus. While Bulgarian courts convicted two Hizballah operatives in absentia in connection with the bombing, justice has yet to be served.

The United States is committed to countering Hizballah and Iran’s malign influence. The funding, training, weapons, and other support Iran provides Hizballah support complex and heinous terrorist attacks like these. The callous murder of civilians must not stand. With our support, more than a dozen countries across Europe, South America, Central America, and the Pacific have issued national level designations, bans, or other restrictions against Hizballah. We urge more countries to take similar measures, which make it harder for the group and its backers in Tehran to threaten peace and security around the globe.

Tags

AntisemitismArgentinaBulgariaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsIranOffice of the SpokespersonTerrorism

Back to Top
# C_2019245DE.01000901.xml

| 22.7.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 245/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 245/9

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses des Präsidiums des Europäischen Parlaments vom 1. Juli 2019 zur Änderung der Durchführungsbestimmungen zum Abgeordnetenstatut des Europäischen Parlaments

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 235 vom 12. Juli 2019
  )

(2019/C 245/08)

Seite 4, Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| „b) | Absatz 4 erhält folgende Fassung:






  ‚4. | Ein Abgeordneter, die die Fahrscheine im Reisebüro des Parlaments erwerben, können, unter ihrer alleinigen Verantwortung und nach Unterzeichnung einer Empfangsbescheinigung, beantragen, dass die zuständige Dienststelle diese Kosten dem Reisebüro direkt erstattet. Ist dies der Fall, kann die zuständige Dienststelle die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Belege aus dem Reservierungssystem des Reisebüros abrufen.‘“ |
| --- | --- | --- |

„b)

‚4.

Ein Abgeordneter, die die Fahrscheine im Reisebüro des Parlaments erwerben, können, unter ihrer alleinigen Verantwortung und nach Unterzeichnung einer Empfangsbescheinigung, beantragen, dass die zuständige Dienststelle diese Kosten dem Reisebüro direkt erstattet. Ist dies der Fall, kann die zuständige Dienststelle die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Belege aus dem Reservierungssystem des Reisebüros abrufen.‘“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

| „b) | Absatz 4 erhält folgende Fassung:






  ‚4. | Die Abgeordneten, die die Fahrscheine im Reisebüro des Parlaments erwerben, können, unter ihrer alleinigen Verantwortung und nach Unterzeichnung einer Empfangsbescheinigung, beantragen, dass die zuständige Dienststelle diese Kosten dem Reisebüro direkt erstattet. Ist dies der Fall, kann die zuständige Dienststelle die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Belege aus dem Reservierungssystem des Reisebüros abrufen.‘“ |
| --- | --- | --- |

„b)

‚4.

Die Abgeordneten, die die Fahrscheine im Reisebüro des Parlaments erwerben, können, unter ihrer alleinigen Verantwortung und nach Unterzeichnung einer Empfangsbescheinigung, beantragen, dass die zuständige Dienststelle diese Kosten dem Reisebüro direkt erstattet. Ist dies der Fall, kann die zuständige Dienststelle die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Belege aus dem Reservierungssystem des Reisebüros abrufen.‘“

---
EXHIBIT 32
 COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date:  May 13, 2009
    /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.William F. Farber, Sr.President and Chief Executive Officer







54



---



##### 



COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: May 13, 2009
    /s/ Scott A. SeasockScott A. SeasockExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer







55
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1184

MEYLIN YOHANA REYES NUNEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 25, 2018 Decided: November 9, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley B. Banias, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON, & HELMS, Charleston, 

South Carolina, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Erica 

B. Miles, Senior Litigation Counsel, Elizabeth K. Fitzgerald-Sambou, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Meylin Yohana Reyes Nunez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review 

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the 

immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

*

 We deny the petition for 

review.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of the merits 

hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not 

compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that 

Reyes Nunez failed to establish a nexus between past persecution or fear of future 

persecution and a protected ground or that her social group was sufficiently particular, see 

INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992) (stating standard of review); Oliva v. 

Lynch, 807 F.3d 53, 59 (4th Cir. 2015) (noting applicant bears burden of showing past or 

feared persecution on account of protected ground).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also deny Reyes Nunez’s motion 

to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

 * Reyes Nunez has waived review of the denial of protection under the CAT because 

she does not raise the issue in the argument section of her brief. Suarez-Valenzuela v. 

Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (failing to raise challenge to Board’s ruling 

or finding in opening brief waives issue). 
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 1.672 Responsibilities. ( a ) The issuance of an allotment to the administration and staff office heads (allottees) is required and is the responsibility of the Director, Office of Budget and Finance. The sum of such allotments shall not be in excess of the amount indicated in the apportionment or reapportionment document.
( b ) The issuance of an allowance is discretionary with department or staff office heads (allottees), as an allowance is merely a management device which allottees may utilize in carrying out their responsibilities. Allottees are responsible for keeping obligations within the amounts of their allotments, whether allowances are issued or not.
( c ) The Director, Office of Budget and Finance, is responsible for requesting apportionments and reapportionments from the Office of Management and Budget. Administration and staff heads shall promptly request that an appropriation or fund be reapportioned if feasible whenever it appears that obligations may exceed the level of the apportionment.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 1514)
§ 23.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 23.500 through 23.550.
#### §§ 4.101-4.103 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.958 Federal employees' compensation cases.

Any award approved prior to September 13, 1960, authorizing Department of Veterans Affairs benefits concurrently with an award of benefits under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act based on a finding that the same disability or death was due to civilian employment is not affected by the prohibition against concurrent awards contained in 5 U.S.C. 8116(b).

[41 FR 20408, May 18, 1976]
§ 42.7 Complaint. ( a ) On or after the date the Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), the reviewing official may serve a complaint on the defendant, as provided in § 42.8 of this part.
( b ) The complaint shall state— ( 1 ) The allegations of liability against the defendant, including the statutory basis for liability, an identification of the claims or statements that are the basis for the alleged liability, and the reasons why liability allegedly arises from the claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) Instructions for filing an answer to request a hearing, including a specific statement of the defendant's right to request a hearing by filing an answer and to be represented by a representative; and
( 4 ) That failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in the imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessments without right to appeal, as provided in § 42.10 of this part.
( c ) The reviewing official shall serve the defendant with a copy of these regulations at the same time as service of the complaint.
# Countering Terrorism

471 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bahrain	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Algeria	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Türkiye	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Spain	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Serbia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Russia	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1…56789…48next page

Back to Top
# Official Journal C 85/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6522 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 85

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6522 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 85/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10604 – OXFORD PROPERTIES / PINEBRIDGE BENSON ELLIOT / SIGMA) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 85/02 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9987– NVIDIA / ARM) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2022/C 85/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10555 – ADIA / TRANSURBAN / AUSTRALIANSUPER / CPP INVESTMENTS / WCX) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 85/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10604 – OXFORD PROPERTIES / PINEBRIDGE BENSON ELLIOT / SIGMA) (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 85/02

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9987– NVIDIA / ARM) (
  1
  )

1

2

2022/C 85/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10555 – ADIA / TRANSURBAN / AUSTRALIANSUPER / CPP INVESTMENTS / WCX) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 85/04 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: — 0,00 % on 1 February 2022 — Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2022/C 85/05 | Special report No 4/2022 – Investment funds: EU actions have not yet created a true single market benefiting investors | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 85/04

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: — 0,00 % on 1 February 2022 — Euro exchange rates

4

Court of Auditors

2022/C 85/05

Special report No 4/2022 – Investment funds: EU actions have not yet created a true single market benefiting investors

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 85/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10625 - CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 85/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10625 - CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN