alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.20 Fees.

(a) *Petition fee.* The fee for filing a petition under this part is: $420.00

(b) *Appeal fees.*

(1) For filing a notice of appeal from the examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| By a micro entity (§ 1.29) | $168.00 |
| By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) | 336.00 |
| By other than a small or micro entity | 840.00 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(1)

(2)

(i) For filing a brief in support of an appeal in an application or *ex parte* reexamination proceeding: $0.00

(ii) In addition to the fee for filing a notice of appeal, for filing a brief in support of an appeal in an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| By a micro entity (§ 1.29) | $420.00 |
| By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) | 840.00 |
| By other than a small or micro entity | 2,100.00 |

Table 2 to Paragraph (b)(2)(ii)

(3) For filing a request for an oral hearing before the Board in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 134:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| By a micro entity (§ 1.29) | $272.00 |
| By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) | 544.00 |
| By other than a small or micro entity | 1,360.00 |

Table 3 to Paragraph (b)(3)

(4) In addition to the fee for filing a notice of appeal, for forwarding an appeal in an application or *ex parte* reexamination proceeding to the Board:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| By a micro entity (§ 1.29) | $472.00 |
| By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) | 944.00 |
| By other than a small or micro entity | 2,360.00 |

Table 4 to Paragraph (b)(4)

[78 FR 4290, Jan. 18, 2013, as amended at 82 FR 52817, Nov. 14, 2017; 85 FR 46993, Aug. 3, 2020; 88 FR 17158, Mar. 22, 2023]
.

, 

### 535

OFFICE OF **THE** ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

&morrblr YItir0.n KOon COomirOi0a.r Burrru of Labor StrtlrtLr **Aurtln,** Teur **ClQlnioa il..**  

### O-7337

rim6 **wum but**  **ir not** 

1 1. l +

### .536

.

l a@& ' raw Aakln rppllralu tor aa om lop 

### runt or t or agob A 

### eenn an& hton 8uoh 18 irrwa l 

### 2004 anI rlullyto in, tUo rl8h the Comd!!:~:



### ruttlelmt boa4 ououto4 PI tho 

### rgqllsrnt with 004 uid 8attl,loo$ l 

### uraa#& tha 

### p.naAmua ot llro I

### hoPun D.Uarr (##,W) OyobU to the Stat.

.a.!, oounu b d&L Ua wont lntonbr 

### &ridboa2 rlrrll



### be aoa2ltlono~ @hat 

### tho a rot rloIat0 any or aho

### 4otloI, t;omB, an4 that tho rlu AOt Mko aBy ptwn



### l A4 prrooa .laJuro(. or 

### rgylorod bg say rotlon l oaduot frW npnnnt4tloa or fati 

### rktombnt 0) 4rq wel: uplo~nt 

### 4go t, 

### us mb-uuto O?xoprrauit~tlror nay bria& J t tor trma6.a n&art 

### Ouoh

ttonon totha

l xtont et tlttr (50) r

### r rrnt of the pnal 

### WAABWP

thrnln, tbo Cmd80 onar KAY, 

### by a **notior** 

### b rritlw, 4rlernd **tha** 

### rxmoutlon or l 

### now bond, 

### r~~irh it not l 

### xeoutrd

l 

### b rubdttrdto the Cocsdariorier within tsonty (20) 

### brrr for hl¶ l pproral, raoh falluro to rxeoutr a nor bon4 nhall iprO Sroto 

### forhit end 08~001 tL0 1iOWM i88UOd t0 thB prinOip&l ESZ6d b raid bond.. Art. i&k of V. -, ;. ad, I

### 537

tb lnonrro ot rll lrndr U&w roguirod, ahaAl br

7ko oktut) aow fUblA8 8 wLlo'8 beoomln&i rontr oa rw bwk@or 

### l

bl~atlen et uetbr 

### without tho join4U 

### Or hU $iw?bdm th@ 8~ l8 it &@a im U808 Oi proAl 'I; rlthoP8 auek jolAdorku 

### rotdoa@ not blah 8rl ba; rlth it rbr wy kroev l rutat cm any bond or tmbrtrklng 04 uiothw, whothor the 6a.m **be** ottioirl Or trrdl?lawl, rxorpt rhrrr torblddrn bl WCS other otatuta, rnd rhe and hrr property u-m**bowl. ”**  Pour **flrrt** qucrtion la therefore amwered ln 

### tr.8 recetirri s.5~ four rrroond qucitiac ir mdwrrd in the 8wmtlve. Your rrn truly,
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Victor Coronado v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00161-CR

Trial court case number: 1408703

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Victor Coronado, pleaded guilty to the offense of unauthorized use of a 

motor vehicle. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at 

confinement for three years. Proceeding pro se, appellant filed a notice of appeal of the 

judgment of conviction. On July 21, 2015, this Court dismissed the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. Appellant has filed (1) a motion to dismiss his appeal, (2) a request to 

withdraw his appeal, and (3) an additional motion seeking dismissal of his appeal and 

requesting to withdraw his appeal. Because this Court has already dismissed the appeal, 

we dismiss as moot appellant’s motions to dismiss his appeal and request to withdraw his 

appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Terry Jennings

 

Date: August 25, 2015
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.325 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.30 Frequency of payment of improved pension and parents' dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC). Payment shall be made as shown in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this section; however, beneficiaries receiving payment less frequently than monthly may elect to receive payment monthly in cases in which other Federal benefits would otherwise be denied. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
( a ) *Improved pension—Monthly.* Payment shall be made monthly if the annual rate payable is $228 or more.
( b ) *Improved pension—Quarterly.* Payment shall be made every 3 months on or about March 1, June 1, September l, and December 1, if the annual rate payable is at least $144 but less than $228.
( c ) *Improved pension—Semiannually.* Payment shall be made every 6 months on or about June 1, and December 1, if the annual rate payable is at least $72 but less than $144.
( d ) *Improved pension—Annually.* Payment shall be made annually on or about June 1, if the annual rate payable is less than $72. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1508)
( e ) *Parents' DIC—Semiannually.* Benefits shall be paid every 6 months on or about June 1, and December 1, if the amount of the annual benefit is less than 4 percent of the maximum annual rate payable under 38 U.S.C. 1315.
( f ) *Payment of less than one dollar.* Payments of less than $1 shall not be made.

Cross Reference:
Pension. See § 3.3(a)(3), (b)(4). [44 FR 45935, Aug. 6, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 1790, Jan. 15, 1986; 53 FR 7903, Mar. 11, 1988; 57 FR 10425, Mar. 26, 1992; 71 FR 52290, Sept. 5, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         192,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,647,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,393,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,493,434
<PP&E>                                       5,375,988
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,731,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,470,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,901,991
<BONDS>                                        106,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,806,390
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,470,801
<SALES>                                      5,037,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,037,630
<CGS>                                        3,111,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,111,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,716,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                   116,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2019

No. 04-18-00524-CR

Braulio TIRADO-MORALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6200

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief in these companion cases was originally due to be filed on January 11, 

2019. After neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed, we 

notified appellant’s counsel via letter that the brief was late and requested a response by no later 

than January 28, 2019. Because appellant did not respond to our letter or file a brief or motion 

for extension of time to file the brief, we ordered appellant’s counsel to file a response stating a 

reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrating the steps being taken 

to remedy the deficiency. In response to our order, appellant filed in both causes a motion for 

extension of time to file appellant’s brief, requesting an additional forty-five days to file the 

brief. We granted the motion, ordered that appellant’s brief be filed no later than February 25, 

2019, and advised appellant that further requests for extension of time will be disfavored. As of 

the date of this order, appellant has not filed the brief.

Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten days of 

the date of this order. The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file 

the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney 

fails to file an adequate response within ten days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for 

an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are 

appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
§ 21.210 Supplies. ( a ) *Purpose of furnishing supplies.* Supplies are furnished to enable a veteran to pursue rehabilitation and achieve the goals of his or her program.
( b ) *Definition.* The term *supplies* includes books, tools, and other supplies and equipment which VA determines are necessary for the veteran's rehabilitation program.
( c ) *Periods during which supplies may be furnished.* Supplies may be furnished during: ( 1 ) Extended evaluation;
( 2 ) Rehabilitation to the point of employability;
( 3 ) Employment services; and
( 4 ) An independent living services program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104(a))
( d ) *Supplies precluded.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section, supplies may not be furnished to a veteran who has elected, or is in receipt of, payment at the educational assistance rate paid under Chapter 34.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(a))
Air Data Solutions sUAS Operating Procedures

Air Data Solutions personnel operating all Air Data Solutions sUAS systems will be required to comply 

with the following operating requirements:

 All operations will be conducted within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the Pilot in Command (PIC) 

at all times. Should the operator lose VLOS of the sUAS at any point during the flight operation, 

the aircraft will immediately be commanded to return to launch (RTL) point.

 All aircraft will be configured with the feature to command immediate RTL upon command 

through the pilot controller and upon flight beyond effective radio control range.

 The lost link procedure for all sUAS will be to RTL immediately upon loss of link. If link cannot be 

re-established within 1 minute upon reaching the RTL waypoint, the aircraft we execute an auto 

landing at the launch location.

 Minimum flight visibility required for all operations will be 3 nautical miles or greater.

 Min cloud clearances will be 1000 feet below and 2000’ horizontally. No flights will be 

conducted above clouds.

 No flights will be conducted in visible moisture or known icing conditions.

 No flights will be conducted in winds in excess of the manufactures published wind limitations.

 In the event of a sUAV propulsion failure, the PIC will immediately return the sUAV for landing if 

possible. If the PIC determines that a return to landing cannot be executed safely, then the PIC 

will ditch the aircraft in a safe location as far away from persons or property as practical.

 All operations will be planned to complete the mission flight plan and return to point of 

intended landing allowing a 20% or greater battery reserve. 

 Minimum certification requirements for every Air Data Solutions sUAS operator will be a FAA 

Private Pilot Certificate with a current FAA Class III Medical Certificate.

 All flight operations above 400 feet AGL and/or beyond 1⁄2 nautical mile will require a visual 

observer (VO) separate from the PIC.

 All sUAS operations will yield to all other non-participating aircraft, manned or unmanned.

 No sUAS operations will be conducted without a thorough pre-flight maintenance inspection 

being completed prior to each sUAS flight.

 No sUAS operations will be conducted with a sUAV that has inoperable equipment.

 No sUAS operations will be conducted within one hour after sunrise and within one hour of 

sunset.

 All sUAS PIC’s will not operate sUAS over private or controlled access property without prior 

consent of the property owner or controlling agency.

 No sUAS operations will be conducted in a reckless or careless manner.

All Air Data Solutions operators will comply with these procedures, except as necessary during 

emergency operations. These operating procedure are established to ensure safety to all persons, 

property, and other air traffic in the areas that Air Data Solutions will be conducting sUAS flight 

operations. Any deviations from these procedures will be reported immediately to the designated Air 

Data Solutions Operations Director.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ingrid Wiik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   August 12, 2003





/s/ Ingrid Wiik				Ingrid Wiik
President and Chief Executive Officer







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew Farrell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:   August 12, 2003





/s/ Matthew Farrell			
Matthew Farrell
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC LAW 107–143—FEB. 14, 2002 116 STAT. 17

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 82:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Feb. 6, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–143

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.

Whereas February 6, 2002, is the 91st birthday of Ronald Wilson

Reagan;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is the first former President ever to attain

the age of 91;

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan have

distinguished records of public service to the United States, the

American people, and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming margins as President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore ‘‘the

great, confident roar of American progress, growth, and optimism’’

and ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s leadership was instrumental in extending

freedom and democracy around the globe and uniting a world

divided by the Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of Americans, and by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s eloquence united Americans in times

of triumph and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First Lady

but also led a national crusade against illegal drug use;

Whereas, together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their lives

to promoting national pride and to bettering the quality of life

in the United States and throughout the world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the country

are with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle with Alzheimer’s

disease: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress,

on behalf of the American people, extends its birthday greetings

and best wishes to Ronald Reagan on his 91st birthday.

Approved February 14, 2002.

Feb. 14, 2002

[H.J. Res. 82]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2212 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2212

 To require the President to close the Department of Defense detention 
       facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2007

 Ms. Harman (for herself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the President to close the Department of Defense detention 
       facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRED CLOSURE OF GUANTANAMO BAY DETENTION FACILITY.

    (a) Closure of Detention Facility.--Not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the President shall close the Department of Defense 
        detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and
            (2) all detainees detained at such facility shall be 
        removed from the facility and--
                    (A) transferred to a military or civilian detention 
                facility in the United States and charged with a 
                violation of United States or international law and 
                tried in an Article III court or military legal 
                proceeding before a regularly-constituted court;
                    (B) transferred to a military or civilian detention 
                facility in the United States without being charged 
                with a violation of law if the detainee may be held as 
                an enemy combatant or detained pursuant to other legal 
                authority as Congress may authorize;
                    (C) transferred to an international tribunal 
                operating under the authority of the United Nations 
                with jurisdiction to hold trials of such individuals;
                    (D) transferred to their country of citizenship or 
                a different country for further legal process, provided 
                that such country provides adequate assurances that the 
                individual will not be subject to torture or cruel, 
                inhuman, or degrading treatment; or
                    (E) released from any further detention.
    (b) Immigration Status.--The transfer of an individual under 
subsection (a) shall not be considered an entry into the United States 
for purposes of immigration status.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed November 25, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00831-CV

____________

JENNIFER JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

OXY USA, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-05889

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed October 17, 2014. To date, the 

filing fee of $195.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before December 10, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM