alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

October 6, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00623

- CR

EX PARTE Luis Alfredo APARICIO

From the County Court

, Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 3976
Hono rable Mark R. Luitjen , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was due on September 2 1 , 2022. On October 3 , 2022

, the court reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension until October 21 , 2022

. W e GRANT the reporter’s request for extension

. The court reporter is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record with this court no later than October 21 , 202 2

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt o set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of October, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
*The National Map* - Utah Transportation Pilot Project - RETIRED EDITION**Fact Sheet 118-01 (November 2001)**

PLEASE NOTE:
This fact sheet has been replaced by the fact sheet titled "***The National Map***Pilot Projects" located at:
mac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs06202.html for the HTML versionandmac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs06202.pdf for the PDF version
Most browsers will automatically load the new version in 20 seconds.
| Top | Main Table of Contents| MappingPublications| Eastern Region Geography | Geography Home |

U.S. Department of the Interior — U.S. Geological Survey — 509 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA **URL:***http://mac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs11801.html* — **Contact:**[email protected]**Page Maintainer:** USGS Eastern Region Geography**Last modified:**   14:26:55 Tue 31 Dec 2002 — USGS Privacy Policy and Disclaimers— Accessibility
1 The HONORABLE ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, United States Bankruptcy

Judge for the Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1077

___________ In re: Richard Charles Tolbert, * * Debtor, *

------------------------------------------------ * * Appeal from the United States Richard Charles Tolbert, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * For the Eighth Circuit. Appellant, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Richard Fink, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 6, 2001 Filed: July 20, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Richard Charles Tolbert appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s 1 dismissal of his Chapter 13 petition. For the reasons explained in the bankruptcy appellate panel’s opinion, we affirm the decision of the bankruptcy-2-

court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The appellee is awarded double costs because the appeal is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Eleanor R. Pierson, Respondent, *v.*James M. Ward, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff by the Municipal Court, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan.

Adams & Hyde, for appellant.

James S. Lehmaier, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The defendant, by his answer, duly pleaded that at the time of tíie commencement of the action, the defendant was, and still is, a nonresident of the county of Hew York, and that by reason thereof the court in which the action was brought had no jurisdiction, etc. At the trial the defendant showed that at the various times referred to he resided at Red'Bank in the state of Hew Jersey. It was held by this court in Rieser v. Parker & Co., 27 Misc. Rep. 205, that the provisions of the Greater Hew York charter attempting to confer upon the Municipal' Court of the ,Oity of Hew York jurisdiction of actions in which the defendant is a nonresident of the state, are ipiconstitutional, and the case at bar is covered by that decision.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide' event.
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

§ 36.4393 Complaint and hearing procedure. ( a ) Upon receipt of a written complaint signed by the complainant to the effect that any person, firm or entity has violated the undertakings referred to in § 36.4392, such person, firm or other entity shall be invited to discuss the matter in an informal hearing with the Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs regional office or center.
( b ) If the existence of a violation is denied by the person, firm or other entity against which a complaint has been made, the Director or designee shall conduct such inquiries and hearings as may be deemed appropriate for the purpose of ascertaining the facts.
( c ) If it is found that the person, firm or other entity against which a complaint has been made has not violated the undertakings referred to in § 36.4392, the parties shall be so notified.
( d ) If it is found that there has been a violation of the undertakings referred to in § 36.4392, the person, firm or other entity in violation shall be requested to attend a conference for the purpose of discussing the matter. Failure or refusal to attend such a conference shall be proper basis for the application of sanctions.
( e ) The conference arranged for discussing a violation shall be conducted in an informal manner and shall have as its primary objective the elimination of the violation. If the violation is eliminated and satisfactory assurances are received that the person, firm or other entity in violation will comply with the undertakings pursuant to § 36.4392 in the future, the parties concerned shall be so notified.
( f ) Failure or refusal to comply and give satisfactory assurances of future compliance with the equal employment opportunity requirements shall be proper basis for applying sanctions. The sanctions shall be applied in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 11246 as amended and the regulations of the Secretary of Labor.
( g ) Upon written application, a complainant or a person, firm or other entity against which a complaint has been filed may apply to the Under Secretary for Benefits for a review of the action taken by a Director. Upon receiving such application, the Under Secretary for Benefits may designate a representative or representatives to conduct an informal hearing and to make a report of findings. The Under Secretary for Benefits may, after a review of such report, modify or reverse an action taken by a Director.
( h ) Reinstatement of restricted persons, firms or other entities shall be within the discretion of the Under Secretary for Benefits and under such terms as the Under Secretary for Benefits may prescribe.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3703(c)(1))
[73 FR 6310, Feb. 1, 2008. Redesignated at 75 FR 33705, June 15, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 34319, June 16, 2015]
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

	I, **Ingrid Wiik**, Chief Executive Officer of Alpharma Inc., certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Alpharma Inc.;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

		(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

		(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

		(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

	5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

		(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

		(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

Date: January 12, 2005

/s/ Ingrid Wiik______________

Ingrid Wiik
AMERICAN AIRLINES

September 24, 2010 

Linda L. Lundell 

U.S. Carrier Licensing 

 Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 Re: American Airlines, Chicago-Mexico City 

 (DOT-OST-2004-16945)__________________

Dear Ms. Lundell: 

 American Airlines has completed its poll of the parties 

served with our notice of September 23, 2010 in the captioned 

docket that we plan to resume own-metal nonstop service between 

Chicago and Mexico City effective December 16, 2010. 

 We have received non-objections from each of the parties 

we served. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 Carl B. Nelson 

 Associate General Counsel 

 American Airlines, Inc. 

 1101 17th Street, N.W., Suite 600 

 Washington, D.C. 20036 

 (202) 496-5647 

 carl.nelson@aa.com 

cc: Docket Branch 

 Paul Gretch 

 Esta Rosenberg 

 Brian Hedberg 

 Service list 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have this day served the 

foregoing document by email on the following carriers: 

 Air Tran epfaberman@wileyrein.com 

 Frontier 

 

 Alaska/Horizon msinick@ssd.com 

Amerijet jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

 

 Continental dan.weiss@coair.com 

 ExpressJet 

 

 Delta sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

 Pinnacle 

 SkyWest 

 JetBlue jhill@dowlohnes.com 

 Spirit jyoung@yklaw.com 

 Sun Country john.fredericksen@suncountry.com 

 United, Mesa jeffrey.manley@united.com 

US Airways howard.kass@usairways.com 

 USA 3000 pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

 FedEx nssparks@fedex.com 

 UPS dfisher@kelleydrye.com 

 ABX rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

 

 ________________________ 

 CARL B. NELSON 

September 24, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.263 Corpus of estate; net worth. ( a ) *General.* The following rules are for application in determining the corpus of estate of a parent where dependency is a factor under § 3.250, and the net worth of a veteran, surviving spouse, or child where pension is subject to Pub. L. 86-211 (73 Stat. 432) under § 3.252(b). Only the estate of the parent, in claims based on dependency, or the estate of the veteran, surviving spouse, or child-claimant in claims for pension, will be considered. In the absence of contradictory information, the claimant's statement as to ownership and estimate of value will be accepted.
( b ) *Definition. Corpus of estate* and *net worth* mean the market value, less mortgages or other encumbrances, of all real and personal property owned by the claimant except the claimant's dwelling (single-family unit) including a reasonable lot area, and personal effects suitable to and consistent with the claimant's reasonable mode of life.
( c ) *Ownership.* See § 3.262(k).
( d ) *Evaluation.* In determining whether some part of the claimant's estate should be consumed for his or her maintenance, consideration will be given to the amount of the claimant's income, together with the following factors: whether the property can be readily converted into cash at no substantial sacrifice; ability to dispose of property as limited by community property laws; life expectancy; number of dependents who meet the requirements of § 3.250(b)(2); potential rate of depletion, including unusual medical expenses under the principles outlined in § 3.262(l) for the claimant and his or her dependents.
( e ) VA will exclude from the corpus of estate or net worth any amount designated by statute as not countable as a resource. See § 3.279.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395w-141(g)(6))
[28 FR 33, Jan. 1, 1963, as amended at 39 FR 28527, Aug. 8, 1974; 44 FR 45936, Aug. 6, 1979; 57 FR 59299, Dec. 15, 1992; 58 FR 33767, June 21, 1993; 62 FR 51279, Sept. 30, 1997; 67 FR 49587, July 31, 2002; 68 FR 60852, Oct. 24, 2003; 70 FR 15591, Mar. 28, 2005; 76 FR 4248, Jan. 25, 2011; 83 FR 47269, Sept. 18, 2018]
# Official Journal C 262/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 625 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 625 August 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 262/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9371 — DSV/Panalpina Welttransport) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 262/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9371 — DSV/Panalpina Welttransport) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 262/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 262/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    this Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Thor Industries, Inc.
 Date: June 19, 2007
    /s/ Wade F. B. ThompsonWade F. B. ThompsonChairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer)
Order entered January 21 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01220
- CR HUBERT WILLIAMS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F11
- 53043
- M



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the State’s motion for extension of time to file the State’s brief. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           10505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    98028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     127645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                251082
<PP&E>                                          339880
<DEPRECIATION>                                  142153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  570295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           110253
<BONDS>                                         226070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4670
<OTHER-SE>                                      193712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    570295
<SALES>                                         240410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                240410
<CGS>                                           140848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   140848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 80748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9315
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2021-B23 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; KeyBank National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Benchmark 2021-B23 Certifications

---
# CE2004084EN.01029601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/296 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/296

---

(2004/C 84 E/0343)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0031/04

by Astrid Lulling (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Practices of some Luxembourg insurance companies

Subject:

Since the beginning of 2004, some insurance companies in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg have required independent experts in the automobile sector to work with the Belgian loss adjuster Informex.

Does the Commission take the view that this practice is compatible with the principle of the free movement of services established by Articles 14 and 49 of the EC Treaty? If not, what measures will it take to put an end to these discriminatory practices?

Some of the companies involved prescribe which garage their clients must use for their repairs.

Does not the Commission share my view that that practice infringes the principle of the free movement of services established by Articles 14 and 49 of the EC Treaty referred to above? If so, is it prepared to take the measures required to put an end thereto?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(3 March 2004)

(3 March 2004)

The Commission has taken note of the facts referred to by the Honourable Member. However, in accordance with Article 49 of the EC Treaty and in light of the information provided by the Honourable Member, the Commission is not able to act in this case in accordance with the infringement procedure provided for in Article 226 of the EC Treaty because the facts refer to existing contractual relations between several private entities.

The provisions of the EC Treaty which relate to providing services are formally addressed to the Member States. Although this does not mean that rights cannot be conferred simultaneously on any individual who may be affected by the observance of the rules, as defined here, contesting the practices of private entities falls mainly within the competence of the national courts. In fact, it is established case law that it is firstly the responsibility of national courts to apply Community law and to establish the implications of the case law of the Court of Justice within the procedural framework. Since it is a question of the interpretation of Community law, it is necessary in any event to mention the possibility for national courts to use the mechanism of the preliminary question provided for in Article 234 of the EC Treaty to obtain an interpretation of the provisions of Community law from the Court of Justice, which alone has jurisdiction in this respect.

If the choice of Informex by each insurance company was made in cooperation with competing companies and not independently, such cooperation could be interpreted under Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty. This Article prohibits agreements between companies which are likely to affect trade between Member States and which are aimed at restricting competition. However, the Commission does not have any information which indicates that such cooperation might exist.

---