alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on [Part 3](/current/title-38/part-3?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at [61 FR 7216](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-7216), Feb. 27, 1996; [62 FR 35970](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-35970), July 3, 1997; [62 FR 47532](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-47532), Sept. 9, 1997; and [67 FR 46868](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-46868), July 17, 2002.

#### § 3.108 State Department as agent of Department of Veterans Affairs.

Diplomatic and consular officers of the Department of State are authorized to act as agents of the Department of Veterans Affairs and therefore a complete claim as set forth in [§ 3.160(a)](/on/2024-09-18/title-38/section-3.160#p-3.160(a)) or an intent to file a claim as set forth in [§ 3.155(b)](/on/2024-09-18/title-38/section-3.155#p-3.155(b)) or evidence submitted in support of a claim filed in a foreign country will be considered as filed in the Department of Veterans Affairs as of the date of receipt by the State Department representative.

Cross Reference:

Evidence from foreign countries. See [§ 3.202](/on/2024-09-18/title-38/section-3.202).

[[26 FR 1569](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/26-FR-1569), Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at [79 FR 57695](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-57695), Sept. 25, 2014]
GUALBERTO SANCHEZ

QUINTANA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2083

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judge

.

Gualberto Sanchez

- Quintana, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for App ellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.420(a)(2); see Rivera v. Dep’t of Health , 177

So. 3d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

DAVID SANCHEZ GARZA , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0527 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2015

- 137939 The Honorable Erin O’Brien Otis , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

APPEARANCES Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Robert E. Prather Counsel for Respondent

David Sanchez Garza , Buckeye Petitioner FILED 11-20-18STATE v. GARZA Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Paul J. McMurdie , and Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner David Sanchez Garza seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’ s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’ s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
§ 21.4213 Notice of hearing by Committee on Educational Allowances. ( a ) *Content of hearing notice.* In any case referred to the Committee on Educational Allowances for consideration, a hearing will be held. If, as provided in § 21.4212(b), the educational institution has timely notified the Committee of its intent to participate in the hearing, the educational institution will be notified by certified letter from the Chairperson of the date when the hearing will be held. This hearing notification will inform the educational institution of— ( 1 ) The time and place of the hearing;
( 2 ) The matters to be considered;
( 3 ) The right of the educational institution to appear at the hearing with representation by counsel, to present witnesses, to offer testimony, to present arguments, and/or to submit a written statement or brief; and
( 4 ) The complete hearing rules and procedures.
( b ) *Expenses connected with hearing.* The notice also will inform the educational institution that VA will not pay any expenses incurred by the educational institution resulting from its participation in the hearing, including the expenses of counsel or witnesses on behalf of the educational institution.
( c ) *Publication of hearing notice.* Notice of the hearing will be published in the Federal Register, which will constitute notice to any interested individuals, and will indicate that, while such individuals may attend and observe the hearing, they may not participate unless called as witnesses by VA or the educational institution.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3241(a), 3323(a), 3689(d), 3690)
[63 FR 35834, July 1, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 16972, Apr. 5, 2007; 74 FR 14669, Mar. 31, 2009]
§ 21.3044 Entitlement. ( a ) *Limitations on entitlement.* Each eligible person in entitled to educational assistance not in excess of 45 months, or the equivalent thereof in part-time training. The Department of Veterans Affairs will not authorize an extension of entitlement except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. The period of entitlement when added to education or training received under any or all of the laws cited in § 21.4020 will not exceed 48 months of full-time educational assistance. The period of entitlement will not be reduced by any period during which employment adjustment allowance was paid after the eligible person completes a period of rehabilitation and reaches a point of employability.
( b ) *Continuous pursuit is not required.* The 45-month period of entitlement is any 45 months within the period of eligibility. The eligible person is not required to pursue his or her program for 45 consecutive months. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3511(a))
( c ) *Exceeding the 45 months limitation.* The 45 months limitation may be exceeded only in the following cases: ( 1 ) Where no charge against the entitlement is made based on a course or courses pursued by a spouse or surviving spouse under the special assistance for the educationally disadvantaged program (See § 21.3344(d); or
( 2 ) Where special restorative training authorized under § 21.3300 exceeds 45 months.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3541(b), 3533(b))
[49 FR 48692, Dec. 14, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 26109, May 24, 1996]
Exhibit 31.2
I, William R. Sprow, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sentex SensingTechnology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 28, 2004   /s/ William R. Sprow, Chief Financial OfficerSignature & Title   
12
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 435

- C V



### ____________________

$6,451.27 U.S. CURRENCY

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. CV1205670

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Eric Loften filed a notice of appeal of an interlocutory order granting

counsel’s motion to withdraw. On October 9 , 2014, we notified the parties that our

jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and that the appeal would

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. Loften filed a response, but failed to establish

this Court’ s jurisdiction.2 Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judg ment. Lehmann v.

Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) . We dismiss the appeal without

reference to the merits. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

_____________________ ___________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on November 12, 2014

Opinion Delivered November 13, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3386 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3386

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to require prosecutors in the 
                  Department of Justice to be ethical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

  Mr. McDade introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to require prosecutors in the 
                  Department of Justice to be ethical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ethical Standards for Federal 
Prosecutors Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 31 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 530B. Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government
    ``(a) An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws 
and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each 
State where such attorney engages in that attorney's duties, to the 
same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys in that State.
    ``(b) The Attorney General shall make and amend rules of the 
Department of Justice to assure compliance with this section.
    ``(c) As used in this section, the term `attorney for the 
Government' includes any attorney described in section 77.2(a) of part 
77 of title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 31 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``530B. Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 17.553 Failure to comply with terms and conditions of agreement. ( a ) *Liquidated damages.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a participant of the RCSSP who fails to accept payment or instructs the educational institution in which the participant is enrolled not to accept payment, in whole or in part, of a scholarship under the agreement entered into under § 17.551 will be liable to the United States for liquidated damages in the amount of $1,500.
( b ) *Liability during program of study.* Liability under this section is in lieu of any service obligation arising under the agreement. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, a participant of the RCSSP will be liable to the United States for the amount that has been paid to or on behalf of the participant under the agreement if any of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The participant fails to maintain an acceptable level of academic standing in the educational institution in which the participant is enrolled, as determined by the educational institution;
( 2 ) The participant is dismissed from the educational institution for disciplinary reasons; or
( 3 ) The participant voluntarily terminates the program of study in the educational institution before the completion of the program of study for which the RCSSP was awarded.
( c ) *Liability during period of obligated service.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, if a participant of the RCSSP does not complete their period of obligated service, the United States will be entitled to recover from the participant an amount determined in accordance with the following formula: A = 3Φ(t−s/t), where: ( 1 ) `A' is the amount the United States is entitled to recover;
( 2 ) `Φ' is the sum of: ( i ) The amounts paid under this subchapter to or on behalf of the participant, and
( ii ) The interest on such amounts, which would be payable if at the time the amounts were paid they were loans bearing interest at the maximum legal prevailing rate, as determined by the Treasurer of the United States.
( 3 ) `t' is the total number of months in the period of obligated service of the participant; and
( 4 ) `s' is the number of months of such period served by the participant.
( d ) *Limitation on liability for reductions-in-force.* Liability will not arise under paragraph (c) of this section if the participant fails to maintain employment as a VA employee due to a staffing adjustment.
( e ) *Repayment period.* The participant will pay the amount of damages that the United States is entitled to recover under this section in full to the United States no later than one year after the date of the breach of the agreement.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.953 Pub. L. 85-56 and Pub. L. 85-857. ( a ) *In receipt of or entitled to receive benefits on December 31, 1958.* Any person receiving or entitled to receive benefits under any public law administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs on December 31, 1958, may, except where there was fraud, clear and unmistakable error of fact or law, or misrepresentation of material facts, continue to receive such benefits as long as the conditions warranting such payment under those laws continue. The greater benefit under the previous law or the corresponding section of title 38 U.S.C., will be paid in the absence of an election to receive the lesser benefit. (Authority: Section 10, Pub. L. 85-857)
( b ) *Emergency officers' retirement pay.* Any person who was receiving, or entitled to receive, emergency officers' retirement pay, or other privileges or benefits as a retired emergency officer of World War I, on December 31, 1958, under the laws in effect on that day, will, except where there was fraud, clear and unmistakable error as to conclusion of fact or law, or misrepresentation of material facts, continue to receive, or be entitled to receive, emergency officers' retirement pay at the rate otherwise payable on December 31, 1958, and such other privileges and benefits, so long as the conditions warranting such pay, privileges, and benefits under those laws continue. (Authority: Section 11, Pub. L. 85-857)
( c ) *Service connection established under prior laws.* In the absence of fraud, misrepresentation of material facts or clear and unmistakable error, all cases where compensation was payable on December 31, 1957, for disability service connected under prior laws, repealed by Pub. L. 85-56, including those service connected under the second proviso of section 200 of the World War Veterans' Act, 1924, as amended, are protected by section 2316(b), Pub. L. 85-56 and section 10, Pub. L. 85-857 as to both service connection and rate of compensation, so long as the conditions warranting such status and rate continue. Any disability so service connected may be evaluated under the Schedule for Rating Disabilities, 1945 (looseleaf edition) and benefits awarded on the basis thereof, as well as special monthly compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1114, provided such action results in compensation payable at a rate equal to or higher than that payable on December 31, 1957. Where a changed physical condition warrants reevaluation of service-connected disabilities, compensation will be awarded under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1114.
[26 FR 1608, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 26 FR 8561, Sept. 13, 1961; 26 FR 12766, Dec. 30, 1961]
# L DEPARTMEN TG F RIGIOHA L AlUPOS r 

## ,M:nNGrQRTATIQ N l^CC mOPERfdlOH

S ^OiOQCI- g A S:2 I 

# Congres s o t

tfj c Unitct J ^tares ' Hous e o f J\cprtscutatiUcf

i Sillaflliinstoi

u S C 20515-010 2 Aui'usl24 , 20! 0 ocsBvenic-ii T

Kr*•-•^•^tu.^*.tz*•^'.*£^ x '•?•» • •J'h e I luiiOKible Raymon dM . LaHoo d Sccrct.i i y o f

TninspiirlHLi<i

n U.S . D?p?.rturc o f

rrRnsponouci i nOONc w .ler.scy Ave . .SI" . WasliinGion , D C 203!J(

> Rt : Smnl l C'oinimuiih ' Ai r .Scivic c Developmen t

Ciran t .Appliculii m Diiihu n Ri.-[;iun!il'Airi)url - DUNS/ / 04-06-4822 2 Dear Honorabl e LaHood : I on i wTitiii

R1 0 cxprcs s m y iiimo.s i siippiiri lo r th e Siiii H Coiiiniuiiii y Ai r Scr\'ic c Dcvtlopiiicn i (iriiii i applicaiio: ) Siibniinc db y tli c Doihn nKcgionn l Airpisrl . Tli e S750,OuC'^riini wil l fundnsmnu p phas e l o csiuhlisl i dircvr i servit e beiwtft s UoilianRoGJojin i Airpor t nn dth e Ainerkat i Airline s hu b ftt Dallas-fo nWon hAirpon . ! i i s critica l thn t

Dotha n Kcgiona l Airpo n cnsiomcr. ^ i-.Hv e ncccs. ^ ii ) th e Dalla^i-rort Woril i nirport . B S ii i s alo p ilrsliimiit mlo r hih^jiuciS iraveler s i nth e wiiccias s SKS . Frovidini j direc t acci;.s s t o Dallas-Kort

Won hAiipo n wo'ilv l improv e ihc iihilii y in uliriic i ne w businesses , iiicreus e th e iimoiin i o f

inveslmen i o f

c.si.'ciiii u bu.=!inesse. s an dgro w th e econom y o f somhcas i .Alfihnma . A s (h e IJ-S . CijiiiiivssnKi n lo r th e Secon dConcressiona l District , I nmv.c H ir.vur e ol'ih e benefit s ihi s proarn mwoul dbrir. g i n ih e Ooiiiu nRcijionu l Airpnrl . Thi s girui : woul dposiiivel y inii>u a'.lie ecnnOnii c Wel l bciji g oi'man y businesses , constitucr.i s an dcomniuniiie. s in'.h e surroundin g nrcn . Therefore , I urit c yiui r ful l eonsiceraiiu n vi

f ilii. s proposa S cut

dawai t afavorabl e response . Sineerelv .

Memhe r o ( CirngTcs.* ;

iCfitJiv«i>iir.Tiv9t . f : ,- • • 7 3 ••'fj.*,; , :;r-»»T,ri:n * i n ^ ^ r . ,ui:>*«*^ , A : j ; m l Fi^.i:'.3M.'!^.JJ-,1 3 ?Hl\l1 D OKItE.'-'ia D I'-tril l Dotha n Regiona l Airport , Dothan , Alabam a Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Proposa l - 201 0 

## 4 2
§ 21.5103 Travel expenses. ( a ) *General.* VA shall determine and pay the necessary expense of travel to and from the place of counseling for a veteran who is required to receive counseling as provided under 38 U.S.C. 111 (a), (d), (e), and (g). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 111(a), (d), (e), and (g))
( b ) *Restriction.* VA will not pay the necessary cost of travel to and from the place of counseling when counseling is not required, but is provided as a result of a voluntary request by the veteran.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 111)
[61 FR 29030, June 7, 1996]
steam_record - Fw: ICR Extension Request 

 

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 09:16PM ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Fletcher, Kent" <k_fletcher@wfec.com> 

Date: 06/24/2010 04:43PM 

cc: "Fletcher, Kent" <k_fletcher@wfec.com> 

Subject: ICR Extension Request 

Dear Ms. Alicea:

Attached is a letter requesting a 90 day extension for Western Farmers Electric Cooperative’s ICR for all three 

of our plants. 

WFEC will also mail the original copy.

Thank you for your consideration,

Kent Fletcher

Kent Fletcher

Environmental Specialist

Western Farmers Electric Cooperative

Office: (405) 247-4298

Cell: (405)255-3887

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <steam_record@erg.com>, <jordan.ronald@epa.gov>

Date: 7/2/2010 8:16 PM

Subject: Fw: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: June 24 2010 Extension Request.PDF

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E4939DO... 3/1/2011
§ 232.1 General. ( a ) For purposes of this part, a *participant* includes all parties, including any legal counsel or other *authorized representatives* participating in CCB proceedings.
( b ) All *participants* shall act with the utmost respect for others and shall behave ethically and truthfully in connection with all submissions and appearances before the Copyright Claims Board (Board).
[87 FR 30090, May 17, 2022; 87 FR 36061, June 15, 2022]
§ 17.548 Application procedures. ( a ) *Availability.* VA will make awards under the RCSSP only when VA determines it is necessary to assist in alleviating shortages of psychologists, social workers, marriage and family therapists, or mental health counseling professionals in Vet Centers. VA's determination of the number of RCSSP scholarships to be awarded in a fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations.
( b ) *Application-general.* Each individual desiring a RCSSP scholarship must submit an accurate and complete application, including a signed written acceptance agreement.
( c ) *VA's duties.* VA will notify applicants prior to acceptance in the RCSSP of the following information: ( 1 ) A fair summary of the rights and liabilities of an individual whose application is approved by VA and whose acceptance agreement is consummated by VA; and
( 2 ) A full description of the terms and conditions that apply to participation in the RCSSP and service in VA.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0899.)