alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Freeman *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law.*

(Decided June 13, 1912.

59 South. 228.)

*Intoxicating Liquors; Indictment; Sufficiency.*— An indictment for selling liquor without license need not name the party to whom the liquor was alleged to have been sold.

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

John Freeman was convicted , of violating , the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

G. L. Comer, for appellant.

No brief reached the Beporter.

B. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

The indictment was *sufficient.*— Mitchell *v. The State,*141 Ala. 90; *Compton v. The State,*95 Ala. 25.

de GBAFFENBIED, J.

The indictment in this case charges that the defendant sold spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors without a license and contrary to law. The *194defendant assigned numerous grounds of demurrer to the indictment, the court overruled the demurrer, there was a trial by jury, and from the judgment of the court, pronounced upon a verdict of guilty as charged in the inclictinent, accompanied by a fine of $50, the defendant appeals.

The only question presented to us goes to the sufficiency of the indictment. The indictment was not subject to demurrer because it failed to name the party to whom the liquor was *sold.*—Jones *v. State,*136 Ala. 118, 34 South. 236; *Grace v. State,*1 Ala. App. 211, 56 South. 25. Section 7 of the act approved August 9, 1909 (General and Local Acts Special Session 1909, p. 12), which is “an act to promote temperance,” etc., declares that the act shall be liberally construed, so as to accomplish the purpose thereof, which is to promote temperance and discourage the use and consumption of prohibited liquors. Giving a *strict*construction to every word in the above indictment, it was plainly sufficient. It may charge more than the law now requires such an indictment to charge, but it plainly charges the defendant with a violation of our present prohibition laws.—Code, § 7353; *Mitchell v. State,*141 Ala. 90, 37 South. 407; *Olmstead v. State,*89 Ala. 16, 7 South. 775; *Tonsey v. State,*151 Ala. 83, 44 South. 183.

There is no error in the record. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    231,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               487,362
<PP&E>                                         502,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,492,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,440
<BONDS>                                        370,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     526,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,492,163
<SALES>                                        407,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               407,825
<CGS>                                          219,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,946
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,946
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59


</TABLE>
HomePolicy Issues…Global Health

Policy Issues

# Global Health

To protect the American people, the United States actively works to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats. Outbreaks of infectious disease do not respect national borders. Halting and treating diseases at their points of origin is one of the best and most economical ways of saving lives and protecting Americans.

The Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD) at the U.S. Department of State leads and coordinates the Department’s work on strengthening global health security to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS. The Bureau leads U.S. diplomatic engagement; leverages and helps coordinate U.S. foreign assistance; and promotes international cooperation at the national, regional, and multilateral levels to better protect the United States and the world from health threats. The Bureau elevates and integrates global health security as a core component of U.S. national security and foreign policy.

Learn more about GHSD.

## 			Top Stories		

					December 1, 2023				

## PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2023

                    -  May 1, 2024							Taiwan as an Observer at the 77th World Health Assembly						   
                    -  April 19, 2024							G7 Italy 2024 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Addressing Global Challenges, Fostering Partnerships						   
                    -  April 16, 2024							Release of 2024 U.S. Global Health Security Strategy						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 4.7



                                   innovative
                                    software
                                  technologies



December 31, 2001

Iwasaka Investments Limited
11 Duddel Street, 12th Floor
Central, Hong Kong


Dear Sir:

RE:   Amendment to Finance Agreement Dated January 25, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------

We are requesting approval for issuance of 350,000 shares of INIV Series A
Preferred Stock and 700,000 shares of INIV Common Stock in exchange for all
shares of INIV Common Stock previously issued to Iwasaka Investments, Limited.
The dollar amount invested was $700,000 as of December 31, 2001.

The 350,000 shares of INIV Series A Preferred Stock will be issued to Glendower
Holdings, Ltd, 36 Hilgrove Street, St. Helier, Jersey JE4 8TR, Channel Islands,
additionally the 700,000 shares of INIV Common Stock will be issued to Ripley
Associates Limited, Level 23, CD Tower, 313 Silom Road, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand
as you have requested.

The remaining capital to be invested in Innovative Software Technologies, Inc.
will be at a conversion price of $.50 per share.

In addition we are requesting the approval of the issuance of 3,529,412 INIV
Common shares and 1,500,000 Shares of Series A Preferred for the acquisition of
Energy Professional Marketing Group, Inc. As of December 31, 2001, Douglas Shane
Hackett CEO has converted $248,490.50 to 248,491 shares of INIV Series A
Preferred shares.

Enclosed you will find a copy of the Board of Directors Consent and the letter
to the transfer agent for the issuance of the stock for your review. Please sign
the line below and forward to us at the above address.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions on this
please call me at 1-816-584-8030.

Sincerely,


/s/ Douglas Shane Hackett
Douglas Shane Hackett
President

Accepted and agreed to by /s/ M. Yussuf              CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
                         ------------------------    REQUESTED BY INNOVATIVE
Iwasaka Investments Limited                          SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                 112 N.W. Parkway
                               Riverside, MO 64150
                               816-584-8030 voice
                                816-584-0324 fax
                                 www.ist-co.com
# Official Journal C 253E/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5321 September 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5321 September 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 253E/01 | Position (EU) No 13/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationalityAdopted by the Council on 26 July 2010 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

Council

2010/C 253E/01

Position (EU) No 13/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationalityAdopted by the Council on 26 July 2010

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 21.5810 Certifications of enrollment. ( a ) *Enrollment certifications.* An individual who wishes to receive educational assistance and subsistence allowance shall ensure that the accredited institution he or she is attending certifies the individual's enrollment to VA. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141)
( b ) *Content of certification.* The certification should include— ( 1 ) The number of credit hours or clock hours in which the individual is enrolled;
( 2 ) The amount of the cost of tuition, fees, books, laboratory fees, and shop fees for consumable materials used as part of classroom or laboratory instruction which the individual will incur during the period of enrollment; and
( 3 ) The beginning and ending dates of the period of enrollment. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2142)
( c ) *Length of certification.* A school should not certify more than one term, quarter or semester at a time.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2900-0073)
# Official Journal L 236/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 236 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6322 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 236

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6322 July 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Decision of the European Investment Fund of 4 June 2020 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data in the framework of activities carried out by the European Investment Fund | 1 |
| | * | Decision No 1/2020 of the Governing Board of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking of 26 March 2020 laying down internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the S2R JU | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Decision of the European Investment Fund of 4 June 2020 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data in the framework of activities carried out by the European Investment Fund

1

*

Decision No 1/2020 of the Governing Board of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking of 26 March 2020 laying down internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the S2R JU

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
41722.

#### GEORGIA RAILROAD & BANKING COMPANY v. THIGPEN et al.

Dejdn, Judge.

1. Actions for injury to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues. *Code*§ 3-1004. The word “year” means a calendar year *(Code*§ 102-103), that is from January 1 to December 31, inclusive. *Carroll v. Wright,*131 Ga. 728 (5) (63 SE 260). Where the plaintiff’s injury occurred November 28, 1962, and the suit was filed November 27, 1964, the action is brought “within two years” regardless of the fact that 1964, being leap year, has 366 days. Since both the first and last days are counted, the following day, November 28, 1965, would have been more than two years (see *Texas Co. v. Davis,*157 Ga. 538 (122 SE 62)), but November 27, being exactly two years from the date of injury, is “within two years” in the meaning of the statute.

2. Where the plaintiff first alleged that the defendant railroad company “had a standard guage spur railroad track line which ran generally in a northerly and southerly direction in the center of Wayne Street,” and thereafter amended the paragraph to read that the defendant “was the lessee of a standard guage spur railroad track line,” etc., the capacity in which the defendant is sued is not changed by reason of the showing that the interest which the defendant had in the railroad was a leasehold interest.

3. Although the courts take judicial notice of charters granted *66to railroad companies by the Secretary of State *(Atlanta & W.P.R. Co. v. Atlanta B.*& *R. Co.,*124 Ga. 125 (1) (52 SE 320)) and of cities through which the roadbeds of such companies run *(Gainesville Midland R. Co. v. Tyner,*204 Ga. 535, 538 (50 SE2d 108)), the courts cannot take judicial notice contrary to the allegations of pleadings of the type of track (whether a main track or spur track) or of the exact streets within a municipality along which such roadbed is laid. These are matters to be proved by evidence on the trial of the case. The court does not take judicial notice of the location of city streets. *Harmon v. Harmon,*209 Ga. 474 (2) (74 SE2d 75).

Argued January 6, 1966

Decided January 18, 1966

Rehearing denied February 4, 1966.

*Milton F. Gardner, Erwin Sibley,*for appellant.

*G. Lee Dickens, Jr., Lanier, Powell, Cooper & Cooper, Jack L. Cooper, Gordon B. Lanier, Carlton G. Matthews,*for appellees.

The trial court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers to the petition as amended.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
----

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

 

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I,Martin Cohen, Chairman, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, herebycertify that:

 

| 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of		section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as		amended, and  
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly		presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results		of operations of Registrant.
 
       /s/ Martin Cohen  
Martin Cohen  
Chairman, Treasurer				and Principal Financial Officer 
 

Dated: January 28, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 74 FR 19432, Apr. 29, 2009.

§ 51.130 Nursing services. The facility management must provide an organized nursing service with a sufficient number of qualified nursing personnel to meet the total nursing care needs, as determined by resident assessment and individualized comprehensive plans of care, of all patients within the facility 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. ( a ) The nursing service must be under the direction of a full-time registered nurse who is currently licensed by the State and has, in writing, administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability for the functions, activities, and training of the nursing services staff.
( b ) The facility management must provide registered nurses 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
( c ) The director of nursing service must designate a registered nurse as a supervising nurse for each tour of duty. ( 1 ) Based on the application and results of the case mix and staffing methodology, the director of nursing may serve in a dual role as director and as an onsite-supervising nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents in nursing home.
( 2 ) Based on the application and results of the case mix and staffing methodology, the evening or night supervising nurse may serve in a dual role as supervising nurse as well as provides direct patient care only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents in nursing home.
( d ) The facility management must provide nursing services to ensure that there is direct care nurse staffing of no less than 2.5 hours per patient per 24 hours, 7 days per week in the portion of any building providing nursing home care.
( e ) Nurse staffing must be based on a staffing methodology that applies case mix and is adequate for meeting the standards of this part.
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0160) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1741-1743)
[65 FR 968, Jan. 6, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 19434, Apr. 29, 2009]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KCG, INC., as successor to K.C. Wall Products and Ruco Drywall Products, Inc.

, Appellant,

v.

STEVEN BOLIN and DEBORAH BOLIN, his wife, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 927

[ August 8, 2018 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin Bidwill , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 018220(27)

.

Michael B. Buckley of Buckley Law Group, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Rebecca S. Vinocur of Reb ecca S. Vinocur, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the authority of Southern Wall Products v.

Bolin , Case No. 4D18

- 875 (Fla. 4 th DCA July 25 , 2018 ) . Both cases arise out of the same underlying case, and the jurisdictional allegations are similar. In this case, Bolin alleged he was exposed to asbestos in materials manufactured by KCG or its predecessor from 1975 to 19 77 in Florida.

Th e affidavit filed by a KCG representative stated that it did not have any

contacts with Florida prior to 1994. I ts predecessor operated a plant in Florida starting in the early 1980’s , after Bolin’s alleged exposure . Bolin

offered no evidence of minimum contacts , other than his own use of a product which he identified as distributed or manufactured by KCG in the

1970’s. Just as in Southern Wall Products , Bolin failed to satisfy the constitutional minimum contacts for KCG to be subje ct to jurisdiction in

Florida.2 We therefore reverse and remand for entry of an order dismissing KCG

from the action.

W ARNER
, L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0143 SAT Date: 12/20/2013

Print Date: 1/8/2014

Related cases :

Ecotox related cases : Analogs:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 2 1 2

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: ONCO; MUTA; DEVEL; LIVER; AQUATOX-A,C; IRR-S,E,MM; THYROID; UNCERT-SENS Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0143 FATE: log Kow = -0.17 (M) log Koc = 0.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.02 (E) FATE:log Kow = 0.43 (E) log Koc = 5.69 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.06 (E) PMN Substance:
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = via biodeg;
Sorption to soils/sediments = PBT Potential: *CEB FATE:

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed from the skin, absorbed from the lung ( p che m ), p oor absorption from the GI tract (analog). Concern for acute toxicity based

toxicity based mg /kg); mutagenicity based on positive results in several mutagenicity assays for analogues ,) ; and ).

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.047 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.054 green algal 96-h EC50 1.3 fish

_ chronic value 0.005 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.005
algal

_ chronic value 0.14
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR nearest analog methods for ; SAR chemical class =effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations ; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: K.Moran, 564-4322