alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2


                                 SECOND ADDENDUM
                                       TO
                                LETTER OF INTENT
                            DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2002


By and Between MedStrong International Corporation,  hereinafter "MedStrong" and
JVF  International  Solutions,  Inc.,  hereinafter  "JVF."  The  purpose of this
addendum is to grant JVF an  extension on their  performance  under the original
Letter of Intent, and the Addendum of February 2003, to December 31, 2003.

All other terms and  conditions of the September 18, 2002 Letter of Intent shall
remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this being the further  agreement  between the parties,  we
hereby execute this Addendum this    18    day of July 2003, at SAN JUAN
                                  --------                      --------
MEDSTRONG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


/S/ Jerry R. Farrar
------------------------
By:      Jerry R. Farrar
         President/CEO



JVF INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS, INC.


/S/ Julio Vasquez Fernandez
-----------------------------
By:      Julio Vazquez
         President/CEO
NO. CAAP-23-0000431

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DANIEL M. SANDOMIRE; KATY YEN-JU CHEN; TRUDI MELOHN, 

individually and as Co-Trustee under the William

Charles Melohn III Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010

and Co-Trustee under the Trudi Melohn Revocable Trust

dated June 4, 2010; and WILLIAM CHARLES MELOHN III,

individually and as Co-Trustee under the William 

Charles Melohn III Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010

and Co-Trustee under the Trudi Melohn Revocable Trust

dated June 4, 2010, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

DAVID EDWARD BROWN and LANHUA KAO BROWN,

Defendants-Appellants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC151002267)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, and McCullen and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration

filed on April 3, 2024, by Defendants-Appellants David Edward

Brown and Lanhua Kao Brown (Appellants), it appears that:

(1) Appellants move for reconsideration of the

March 25, 2025 Order denying the February 5, 2024 "2nd Motion to

Stay A) Final Judgment [ROA 499] and All Related Orders

Including: B) Garnishee Summons October 20, 2023 [CC DKT 543,

Exhibit 1] C) the 'Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part

Plaintiffs' Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs,'

March 16, 2023; [ROA 450]; D) Garnishee Order, December 15, 2023

[CC DKT 561, Exhibit 2]; E) 2nd Garnishee Order, January 30,

2024,[CC DKT 575; Exhibit 3]," as well as the February 9, 2024

motion with the same title.

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000431

25-APR-2024

08:34 AM

Dkt. 109 ODMR
(2) The motion for reconsideration presents no point

of law or fact that this court overlooked or misapprehended. See

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 25, 2024.

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

2
# Official Journal L 118/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 118 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 664 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 118

English edition

Legislation

Volume 664 May 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/893 of 21 April 2023 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/340 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures relating to air traffic controllers’ licences and certificates | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/893 of 21 April 2023 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/340 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures relating to air traffic controllers’ licences and certificates

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.29 Rounding. ( a ) *Annual rates.* Where the computation of an increase in improved pension rates under §§ 3.23 and 3.24 would otherwise result in a figure which includes a fraction of a dollar, the benefit rate will be adjusted to the next higher dollar amount. This method of computation will also apply to increases in old-law and section 306 pension annual income limitations under § 3.26, including the income of a spouse which is excluded from a veteran's countable income, and parents' dependency and indemnity compensation benefit rates and annual income limitations under § 3.25. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5312(c)(2))
( b ) *Monthly or other periodic pension rates.* After determining the monthly or other periodic rate of improved pension under §§ 3.273 and 3.30 or the rate payable under section 306(a) of Pub. L. 95-588 (92 Stat. 2508), the resulting rate, if not a multiple of one dollar, will be rounded down to the nearest whole dollar amount. The provisions of this paragraph apply with respect to amounts of pension payable for periods beginning on or after June 1, 1983, under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1521, 1541 or 1542, or under section 306(a) of Pub. L. 95-588. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5123)
( c ) *Monthly rates under 38 U.S.C. chapter 18 .* When increasing the monthly monetary allowance rates under 38 U.S.C. chapter 18 for certain individuals who are children of Vietnam veterans or children of veterans with covered service in Korea, VA will round any resulting rate that is not an even dollar amount to the next higher dollar.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1805(b)(3), 1815(d), 1821, 5312)
[48 FR 34471, July 29, 1983, as amended at 65 FR 35282, June 2, 2000; 67 FR 49586, July 31, 2002; 75 FR 4247, Jan. 25, 2011]
# Official Journal L 34/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5810 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 34

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5810 February 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 on amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 on amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Docket Operations, M-30

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140, West Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Subject: Petition for Exception

I, D. Logan Seale Jr., of 220 Kenoza Ave. in Haverhill, MA 01830 hereby petition the FAA for an 

exemption from various sections of 49 USC of Federal Aviation Regulations. I am associated with 

Logan Seale Photography/Interactive of 220 Kenoza Ave, Haverhill, MA, and will be the Pilot in 

command of any aerial photography, following approval of this request.

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95, I

request certain exemptions in order to conduct residential and commercial aerial photography

(henceforth meaning still and/or video) using a small Unmanned Aircraft System- the 3D Robotics 

Iris+

Sincerely,

D. Logan Seale Jr.

220 Kenoza Ave

Haverhill, MA 01830

Logan@LSPhoto.com
42136, 42140.

#### DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM et al. v. GROSSMAN (two cases).

Decided June 13, 1966.

*Rawls &■ Campbell, H. G. Rawls, C. B. Rogers,*for appellants.

*Burt ■& Burt,*for appellee.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Judgments adverse to the defendant having been entered, from which appeals were filed in this court, and counsel for both appellant and appellee having filed with the clerk a written request that, for the purpose of effecting a settlement of the cases and ending the litigation, the judgments be reversed, it is ordered that the judgment in each case be and it is hereby

*Reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2356 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2356

 To amend title 4, United States Code, to encourage the display of the 
               flag of the United States on Father's Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 4, United States Code, to encourage the display of the 
               flag of the United States on Father's Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL OCCASSION FOR DISPLAY OF THE FLAG OF THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``Flag Day, June 14;'' the following: ``Father's Day, 
third Sunday in June;''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00687

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.R. , a Child From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01303 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 22, 2019
AFFIRMED Appellant E.C . appeals the trial court ’ s order terminating h er parental rights to h er child,
J.A.R. Appellant ’ s court

- appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he concluded there are no arguable grounds to be raised on appeal

. T he brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (recognizing Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases ). Additionally, counsel certified he sent appellant a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw , advised appellant of h er right to review the record and file h er own brief, and provided appellant a form motion to request access to the record. This co urt issued an order setting deadlines for appellant to request the record and file a pro se brief ; however, a ppellant did not request the record or file a pro se brief.04

- 18

- 00687

- CV

- 2

- After reviewing the record and counsel ’ s brief, we agree there are no arguable grounds to be raised on appeal. T herefore, we affirm the trial court ’ s order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw b ecause he does not assert any ground for withdrawal other than his conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. S ee id. at 27

– 28 (holding counsel ’ s o bligations in parental termination cases extend through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals, including the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court). Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
§ 18.452 Health and other social services. ( a ) *General.* In providing health, or other social services or benefits, a recipient may not, on the basis of handicap: ( 1 ) Deny a qualified handicapped person these benefits or services;
( 2 ) Give a qualified handicapped person the opportunity to receive benefits or services that are not equal to those offered nonhandicapped persons.
( 3 ) Provide a qualified handicapped person with benefits or services that are not as effective (as defined in § 18.404(b)(2)) as the benefits or services provided to others;
( 4 ) Provide benefits or services in a manner that limits or has the effect of limiting the participation of qualified handicapped persons; or
( 5 ) Provide different or separate benefits or services to handicapped persons except where necessary to provide qualified handicapped persons with benefits and services that are as effective as those provided to others.
( b ) *Notice.* A recipient that provides notice concerning benefits or services or written material concerning waivers of rights of consent to treatment shall ensure that qualified handicapped persons, including those with impaired sensory or speaking skills, are not denied effective notice because of their handicap.
( c ) *Emergency treatment for the hearing impaired.* A recipient hospital that provides health services or benefits shall establish a procedure for effective communication with persons with impaired hearing for the purpose of providing emergency care.
( d ) *Auxiliary aids.* ( 1 ) A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, where necessary to give these persons an equal opportunity to benefit from the service in question.
( 2 ) The Secretary may require recipients with fewer than fifteen employees to provide auxiliary aids where the provision of aids would not significantly impair the ability of the recipient to provide its benefits or services.
( 3 ) Auxiliary aids may include brailled and taped material, interpreters, and aids for persons with impaired hearing or vision.
§ 21.5812 Reports of withdrawals and terminations of attendance and changes in training time. ( a ) *Reports of withdrawals and terminations of attendance.* ( 1 ) An individual shall report to VA facility of jurisdiction whenever he or she withdraws from school or terminates his or her attendance. He or she shall report the last day of attendance. The individual may request that the school verify this information.
( 2 ) The report shall include— ( i ) The date of withdrawal or last date of attendance, as appropriate; and
( ii ) The amount of educational expenses actually incurred by the individual during the period of enrollment before the date of withdrawal, or if the individual does not formally withdraw when he or she stops attending the amount of educational expenses actually incurred by the individual during the period of enrollment before the last date of attendance. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141)
( b ) *Reports of changes in training.* ( 1 ) An individual shall report to the VA field station of jurisdiction each time the individual increases or decreases the number of credit hours or clock hours of training in which he or she is enrolled or otherwise alters the duration of the enrollment.
( 2 ) The report shall include— ( i ) The new number of credit hours or clock hours in which the individual is enrolled;
( ii ) The amount of educational expenses, enumerated in § 21.5810(b)(2), which the individual will incur during the revised period of enrollment; and
( iii ) The effective date of the change in the number of credit hours or clock hours, including any revision in the term of the enrollment.
( 3 ) The individual or VA may ask the school to verify the individual's reports of changes in training.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2900-0156)
#### § 18b.36 Responses to motions and petitions.

Within 8 days after a written motion or petition is served, or such other period as the reviewing authority or the presiding officer may fix, any party may file a response thereto. An immediate oral response may be made to an oral motion.
CO UR T OF AP P E ALS E I G H T H D I S T RI C T O F T E X AS E L P AS O , T E X AS I N RE D O N AL D SM A SAL , SR ., C A N D ID A TE F OR M A YOR OF T HE T OW

N OF H O RI Z O N C I T Y , T E X AS REL A T OR § § § § § § No . 08 - 09 - 00 10 3- CV

A n Ori gi n al Pr o cee di n g i n M an dam us

M EM ORANDAU M OP I NI ON ON P ET I TI ON F OR WRI T OF M ANDAMUS Re l at o r, Do n al d Smas al , Sr . , candi dat e f o r May o r o f t h e To wn

o f Ho ri zo n Ci t y , T ex as a s k s t h i s C o urt t o i s s u e a

w ri t o f man d am u s a g a i n s t t h e C i t y C l e rk o f H o riz o n C i t y , Te x a s . In or d e rto b e e n

ti tl e d to man d am

u s r e l i e f , a r e l atorm u s t me e t tw o r e qu i

r e me n ts . F i r s t, th e r e l ator m u s t s h o wt h at t h e t ri a l

c o urt c l e arl

y a b u s e d i t s d i s c re t i o n . In re P

rudential I

ns ur ance C ompany of A mer ica , 1 4 8 S . W. 3 d

1 2 4 , 1 3 5 ( T e x. 2 0 0 4 ) . S e c o nd , t he r e l at o rm u s t d e mo ns t r at e he ha s no a d e qu at e re me dy

b y a p p e a l . Id. at 1 3 5 - 3 6 . B a s e d on th e r e c or d

b e f or e u s , w e ar e un a

b l e to co n cl ude R el at o r i s en

t i t l ed t o man dam

us rel i ef . A cco rdi n gl y , t h e pet i t i o n f o r wr i t o f man dam us i s d e ni e d . Fu r t he r , w e d e ny t he r e qu e s t ma d e by

t he T o w n o f

H o r iz o n C i

t y , T e xa s f

o rs anc t i o ns p ur s u an t to T EX .R .APP . P. 52. 11.

A pri l 29, 2009 DA VID WE L L INGT ON C HEW , Chi ef J us t i ce Bef o r e Ch ew, C. J. , McCl

ur e, an d Ri

v er a, JJ.
DJI Phantom

PreFlight Checklist

Date: H3DS Flight No.:

Serial No: FAA Reg. No.:

ENVIRONMENTAL

☐ Check for people, animals, property in the flight path (500 foot clear zone required)

☐ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner(s) of your intentions

☐ No airport or ARP within 5 miles

☐ Visibility greater than 3 miles from control station

☐ Determine ideal takeoff and landing locations (level ground and safe locations)

☐ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible and visible to anyone in the area.

HARDWARE/EQUIPMENT

VISUALLY INSPECT THE FRAME

☐ Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints)

☐ Loose or damaged screws, fasteners, bands, straps and/or ties

☐ Loose or damaged wiring

☐ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc.)

☐ Inspect propeller mounts and screws. Apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened 

construction

☐ Inspect and clean camera and camera mounts and ensure they are secured

☐ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated and secured

☐ Propellers are smooth and free of damage/defects (check blade, surface and hubs)

☐ Confirm the model and transmitter are compatible

PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

☐ DJI Phantom placed on level ground in a safe location for takeoff and landing.

☐ If utilizing onboard camera, turn camera on

☐ All RC transmitter controls move freely in all directions, trims in its neutral position, switches in correct 

position and throttle to zero.

☐ Radio transmitter on

☐ Connect power on batter to airframe

☐ Ensure LED indicators and audible tones are all correct

☐ Quickly switch the control mode switch from ATTI to GPS back and forth 6-10 times

☐ Pick up the DJI Phantom and rotate around the horizontal axis 360°, until the LED changes to 

constant Green

☐ Hold the DJI Phantom vertically and rotate it (its nose is downward) around the vertical axis until the 

LED turns off

☐ Scan for nearby people or animals

☐ Stand clear – audibly, loudly announce the word “CLEAR”

☐ Arm the flight controller

PRETAKEOFF CHECKLIST

☐ Turn motors on

☐ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities

☐ Hover at 3-5 feet for approximately 30 seconds (observer for any vibrations or abnormal sounds)

Note abnormalities on PostFlight Checklist

sUAS-102-Phantom © Haag 3D Solution, LLC 2015 April 2015
§ 21.4146 Assignments of benefits prohibited. ( a ) *General.* Section 5301(a), Title 38 U.S.C., provides that payments of benefits due or to become due under the laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs shall not be assigned, except to the extent specifically authorized by law. No law specifically authorizes assignments of educational assistance allowances payable under 38 U.S.C. chapters 30, 32, 33, 35, or 36, or 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606, and therefore none shall be made.
( b ) *Designating an attorney-in-fact.* In any case where a payee of an educational assistance allowance has designated the address of an attorney-in-fact as the payee's address for the purpose of receiving his or her benefit check and has executed a power of attorney giving the attorney-in-fact authority to negotiate such benefit check, such action shall be deemed to be an assignment and is prohibited.
( c ) *Arrangements amounting to an assignment.* Payments may be made to a post office box address or a bank address only if the educational institution (other than an organization or entity offering a licensing or certification test) attests that it has not entered into an assignment agreement with the student, and is not the attorney-in-fact of the student with power to negotiate an educational assistance check on behalf of the student and is not otherwise able to control the proceeds of the benefits check. Such statements shall be subject to review and when determined to be false, may be cause for creation of an overpayment to the account of the veteran or other eligible person, for which the educational institution (other than an organization or entity offering a licensing or certification test) may be liable under the provisions of § 21.4009.
( d ) *Correspondence school addresses.* A request by a veteran or other eligible person to send the benefit check payable to him or her at an address which is an educational institution primarily engaged in correspondence course instruction will be presumed not to be the actual address of the veteran or other eligible person and will not be honored. Benefits checks will not be sent to the veteran or other eligible person in that event until a new address is provided designating the individual's mailing address.
( e ) *Referral to Committee on Educational Allowances.* When the evidence of record indicates that an educational institution has violated the terms of this section, the matter will be referred to the facility Committee on Educational Allowances as provided in §§ 21.4210(g) and 21.4212.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5301(a))
[43 FR 35296, Aug. 9, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 62498, Oct. 31, 1979; 61 FR 26114, May 24, 1996; 63 FR 35831, July 1, 1998; 72 FR 16969, Apr. 5, 2007; 74 FR 14667, Mar. 31, 2009]