alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE UNITED STATES v. WILL J. ALLEN.

[56 C. Cls. 265; 261 U.S. 317.]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Under the act of May 22, 1917, c. 20, 40 Stat. 84, providing that, during the war, warrant and petty officers and enlisted men of the Coast Guard should receive the same rates of pay as those prescribed for corresponding grades or ratings and length of service in the Navy, a yeoman of the Coast Guard, whose duties and qualifications in fact corresponded to those of a chief yeo*705man in the Navy, was entitled to the greater pay of the latter position, notwithstanding an order of the Secretary of the Navy mating a different classification.

Mr. Justice McKeNNA

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 12, 1923.
EXHIBIT 10.32



 Exhibit 10.32 
  
 STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered as of the 6th day of November, 2003 by and between Highland Hospitality Corporation, a
Maryland corporation (the “REIT”) and Brahman C.P.F. Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Investor”). 
  
 THE PARTIES ENTER THIS AGREEMENT on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions: 
  
 WHEREAS, the REIT proposes to undertake an underwritten initial public
offering (the “Offering”) of shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Shares”) pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 (the “Registration Statement”) filed pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Investor desires to purchase Shares directly from the REIT in a private transaction as set forth herein. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties
hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 
  
 1. Investor hereby agrees to purchase 210,000 Shares directly from the REIT on the terms set forth herein. The purchase price per share for the Shares purchased by Investor shall be the initial public offering price set forth in the final
prospectus for the Offering (the “Prospectus”), less an amount equal to the underwriting discount. 
  
 2. Investor understands and agrees that Investor’s purchase of the Shares hereunder is being made pursuant to a private placement exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and the Shares may not be sold, transferred or conveyed by Investor except in compliance with applicable securities laws. 
  
 3. The purchase of the Shares by Investor shall be by means of a cash payment (wire transfer or other means acceptable to
the REIT) and shall close at the time of closing of the Offering. 
  
 4. Investor hereby agrees that Investor’s purchase of the Shares may be described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus. 
  
 5. Investor hereby represents and warrants to the REIT that: 
  
 a. Investor is, and at the time of closing of the purchase of the Shares by Investor will be, a “Qualified Institutional Buyer”
as that term is defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act; and 
  
 b. Investor has received all information Investor deems relevant or necessary with respect to Investor’s purchase of the Shares. 







 6. This Agreement shall terminate if the closing of the Offering shall not have occurred on or before
March 15, 2004. 
  
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into effective as of the 6th day of November, 2003. 
  
  

	 HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 /s/    James L. Francis


	 	 	Name: James L. Francis
	 	 	 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
  
  

	 BRAHMAN C.P.F. PARTNERS, L.P.

		
	By:	 	  /s/    Robert Sobel


	 	 	Name: Robert Sobel
	 	 	Title: Member of G.P.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CLARIDGE
HOTEL AND CASINO CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000730409
<NAME> CLARIDGE HOTEL AND CASINO CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,618,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,092,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   820,000
<INVENTORY>                                    248,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,624,000
<PP&E>                                      47,407,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,106,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,233,000
<BONDS>                                     85,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,379,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,420,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,677,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               55,379,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,408,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,323,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,540,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,540,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,540,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
§ 21.3104 Special training. ( a ) *Initial counseling.* A counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor in the Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) Division will counsel an eligible person with a disability who is a child, spouse, or surviving spouse before referring the case to the Vocational Rehabilitation Panel (established under § 21.60) for consideration as to the child's, spouse's or surviving spouse's need for a course of specialized vocational training or special restorative training. After consulting with the panel, and considering the panel's report, the counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor will determine if the child, spouse, or surviving spouse needs a course of specialized vocational training or special restorative training, and where need is found to exist will prescribe a course which is suitable to accomplish the goals of 38 U.S.C. chapter 35. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3536, 3540-3543, 3561(a))
( b ) *Counseling after special restorative training.* When an eligible person completes or discontinues a course of special restorative training without having selected an objective and a program of education, a counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor in the VR&E Division will provide additional counseling to assist him or her in selecting a program of education suitable to accomplish the purposes of 38 U.S.C. chapter 35.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3561)
[61 FR 26109, May 24, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 2424, Jan. 15, 2008; 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 235 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 235

  To allow for the renegotiation of the payment schedule of contracts 
  between the Secretary of the Interior and the Redwood Valley County 
                Water District, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Thompson of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow for the renegotiation of the payment schedule of contracts 
  between the Secretary of the Interior and the Redwood Valley County 
                Water District, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEGOTIATION OF PAYMENT SCHEDULE.

    Section 15 of Public Law 100-516 (102 Stat. 2573) is amended as 
follows:
            (1) By amending paragraph (2) of subsection (a) to read as 
        follows:
            ``(2) If, as of January 1, 2006, the Secretary of the 
        Interior and the Redwood Valley County Water District have not 
        renegotiated the schedule of payment, the District may enter 
        into such additional non-Federal obligations as are necessary 
        to finance procurement of dedicated water rights and 
        improvements necessary to store and convey those rights to 
        provide for the District's water needs. The renegotiated 
        schedule of payments shall commence when such additional 
        obligations have been financially satisfied by the District. 
        The date of the initial payment owed by the District to the 
        United States shall be regarded as the start of the District's 
        repayment period and the time upon which any interest shall 
        first be computed and assessed under section 5 of the Small 
        Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 (43 U.S.C. 422a et seq.).''.
            (2) By striking subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

Directorate Identifier: 2011

- NM

- 176

- AD

**Costs:** Labor per airplane ( 2 work hour(s) x $8 5 /hour) $ 170 Parts per airplane $ + 0 Cost per airplane $ 170 Number of U.S.

- registered airplanes x 402 Total fleet cost $ 68,340

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a s ignificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         406,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,900
<INVENTORY>                                  1,314,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,849,818
<PP&E>                                       1,302,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,548,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,516,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,313
<OTHER-SE>                                     549,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,548,897
<SALES>                                        176,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,271
<CGS>                                          245,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               550,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (200,658)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,047,052)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,047,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,047,052)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Nicaragua Sanctions

# 									Nicaragua Sanctions							

-  Releases-  May 15, 2024  														Promoting Accountability for Nicaraguan Officials																											 
-  May 15, 2024  														Treasury Sanctions Nicaragua-Based Russian Institution and Gold Companies																													 
-  March 21, 2024  														Sanctions on Nicaragua’s Attorney General																											 
-  March 21, 2024  														Treasury Sanctions Nicaragua’s Attorney General																													 
-  April 19, 2023  														Sanctioning Three Nicaraguan Judges Involved in Depriving Nicaraguans of Their Basic Right to Citizenship																											 
-  April 19, 2023  														Treasury Sanctions Three Nicaraguan Judicial Officials Involved in Human Rights Abuses																													 
-  June 17, 2022  														Holding the Nicaraguan Regime Accountable																											 
-  June 17, 2022  														Treasury Sanctions Nicaraguan State Mining Company																													 
-  January 10, 2022  														Holding Accountable Nicaraguan Agents of Repression																											 
-  January 10, 2022  														Treasury Sanctions Six Nicaraguan Officials Ahead of Ortega-Murillo Sham Inauguration																													 
-  November 15, 2021  														New Sanctions Following Sham Elections in Nicaragua																											 
-  November 15, 2021  														Treasury Sanctions Public Ministry of Nicaragua and Nine Government Officials Following Sham November Elections																													 
-  June 9, 2021  														Announcing Sanctions on the Ortega Regime in Response to Arbitrary Detentions and Other Undemocratic Moves																											 
-  														Archive: Find releases prior to January 20, 2021																											 
-  														Archive: Find releases prior to January 20, 2017																											 
 
-  Department of the Treasury-  														Nicaragua-related Sanctions																													 
 
-  Executive Order-  November 27, 2018  														Executive Order 13851; "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua" 																													 
 
-  Legislation-  														Nicaragua Human Rights and Anticorruption Act of 2018																													 
 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsNicaraguaSanctions

Back to Top
#### § 85.10 Imminent dangers.

Whenever, during the course of, or as a result of, an investigation under this part, the NIOSH officer believes that there is a reasonable basis for an allegation of an imminent danger, NIOSH will immediately advise the employer and those employees who appear to be in immediate danger of such allegation and will inform appropriate representatives of the Department of Labor or the State agency designated under section 18(b) of the OSH Act.

[37 FR 23640, Nov. 7, 1972, as amended at 45 FR 2653, Jan. 14, 1980]
#### § 20.1201 Rule 1201. Amendment of appellate decisions.

A request for amendment of an appellate decision under the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) may be entertained. However, such a request may not be used in lieu of, or to circumvent, the procedures established under Rules 1001 through 1004 (§§ 20.1001-20.1004). The Board will review a request for correction of factual information set forth in a decision. Where the request to amend under the Privacy Act is an attempt to alter a judgment made by the Board and thereby replace the adjudicatory authority and functions of the Board, the request will be denied on the basis that the Act does not authorize a collateral attack upon that which has already been the subject of a decision of the Board. The denial will satisfy the procedural requirements of § 1.579 of this chapter. If otherwise appropriate, the request will be considered one for reconsideration under Rules 1001 through 1004 (§§ 20.1001-20.1004).

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); 38 U.S.C. 7103, 7108)

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 191, Jan. 18, 2019]
§ 2.7 Delegation of authority to provide relief on account of administrative error. ( a ) Section 503(a) of title 38 U.S.C., provides that if the Secretary determines that benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs have not been provided by reason of administrative error on the part of the Federal Government or any of its employees, the Secretary is authorized to provide such relief on account of such error as the Secretary determines equitable, including the payment of moneys to any person whom he determines equitably entitled thereto.
( b ) Section 503(b) of title 38 U.S.C., provides that if the Secretary determines that any veteran, surviving spouse, child of a veteran, or other person, has suffered loss, as a consequence of reliance upon a determination by the Department of Veterans Affairs of eligibility or entitlement to benefits, without knowledge that it was erroneously made, the Secretary is authorized to provide such relief as the Secretary determines equitable, including the payment of moneys to any person equitably entitled thereto. The Secretary is also required to submit an annual report to the Congress, containing a brief summary of each recommendation for relief and its disposition. Preparation of the report shall be the responsibility of the General Counsel.
( c ) The authority to grant the equitable relief, referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, has not been delegated and is reserved to the Secretary. Recommendation for the correction of administrative error and for appropriate equitable relief therefrom will be submitted to the Secretary, through the General Counsel. Such recommendation may be initiated by the head of the administration having responsibility for the benefit, or of any concerned staff office, or by the Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals. When a recommendation for relief under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section is initiated by the head of a staff office, or the Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals, the views of the head of the administration having responsibility for the benefit will be obtained and transmitted with the recommendation of the initiating office.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 503, 512)
[37 FR 22864, Oct. 26, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 30693, Aug. 1, 1984; 54 FR 34981, Aug. 23, 1989; 68 FR 25504, May 13, 2003]
41786.

#### ALLAN-GRAYSON REALTY COMPANY v. STONE MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC.

Felton, Chief Judge.

In this action by a broker to recover commissions on monthly rentals allegedly due the broker under the written contract sued on, a copy of which is allegedly attached to and made a part of the petition, the basis of recovery is the obligation by the lessee to pay to the lessor the rentals specified in the contract, on which commissions are alleged to be due. Since the action is on the contract and the copy attached to the petition does not show the lessee’s signature, there is no valid allegation that the lessee was bound by the contract since the lessor would not be bound in the absence of the signature of the lessee to the purported bilateral contract. While the petition alleges that the contract was entered into by the lessor and lessee, the exhibit controls as to the contents and legal effect of the instrument. *Spiegel v. Hays,*103 Ga. App. 293 (119 SE2d 123).

The lease was for more than one year, and since it was not alleged to have been in writing, only a tenancy at will resulted. *363Compliance with the terms of the contract beyond a year as to the payment of monthly rentals and the payment of the broker’s commissions did not alone take the case out of the statute of frauds. The record shows nothing whatsoever which would estop the lessor from terminating the contract either as to the lessee or the broker so the cases involving estoppel, cited by appellant, are not applicable.

Argued February 7, 1966

Decided March 11, 1966

Rehearing denied March 22, 1966.

*Fine & Roiader, D. W. Roiader,*for appellant.

*Young & Thomason, Hardaway Young, III,*for appellee.

The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Jun-27-1998
<CASH>                                               221,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1,558,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         488,000
<INVENTORY>                                          552,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2,104,000
<PP&E>                                                59,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        59,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,391,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                461,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              62,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         1,829,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2,391,000
<SALES>                                            4,075,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4,075,000
<CGS>                                              2,628,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,228,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      213,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                          22,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  191,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         191,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .03
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 19.103-19.199 [Reserved]