alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsRemarks & Releases...Remarks at the “America Is All In” Launch Event

# 									Remarks at the “America Is All In” Launch Event							

Remarks

John Kerry, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate

February 19, 2021

*As prepared*

Marcene – thank you very much. I’m delighted to be with all of you on such an important day.

I know many of you were there at Le Bourget a little over five years ago when we gaveled in the historic Paris Agreement. It was the product of many hearts and many hands – a diplomatic balancing act, and at one point it felt like success or failure could come down to a single word.

And for the last four years, there were times when many feared failure would depend on a single word – Trump.

Yet, five years later, the Paris Agreement and the international climate regime are is still standing – all because cities, states, businesses – organizations across the country – stepped up and said, “We are still in.”

We Are Still In was much more than a slogan. In 2017, only 1 state and 33 cities had committed to get 100% of their energy from clean sources; now, 13 states, Puerto Rico, and 165 cities have 100% clean energy commitments.

And since 2017, 16 states have passed or committed to pass regulations and legislation that would phase down the use of HFCs.

You showed the world the real face of the United States, even before 81 million Americans last November changed the public face of leadership that Americans choose to show the world.

And now, we need you to make “all-in” have even more urgency and meaning.

We come to this work with humility knowing that the United States’ global absence did have consequences.

We come to this work with honesty knowing that Paris isn’t enough.

And we come to this work with ambition knowing that even though the U.S. is thankfully back in the Paris Agreement, we need every major economy, including ours, to achieve what Paris never guaranteed: to increase our action to keep 1.5 degrees of warming within reach, and to get on a track to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

That means we need all of America and all of the world to be “All In.”

We need you to join us. Even with the United States back in officially, we need you to represent the best of the United States abroad because your accomplishments of the last four years are proof that progress is possible, and that progress comes with prosperity.

You’re our success stories. So, if you came to the COPs the last three years, keep coming! And if you didn’t, promise that this year we’ll see you in Glasgow, so we all meet this moment and we meet it together.

Let’s get the job done. I look forward to your partnership and your questions.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate and EnvironmentOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2323]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-302; NRC-2009-0039]]


Florida Power Corporation Notice of Receipt and Availability of 
Application for Renewal of Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating 
Plant Facility Operating License No. DPR-72 for an Additional 20-Year 
Period

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received an 
application, dated December 16, 2008, from Florida Power Corporation, 
filed pursuant to Section 104b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 (10 
CFR Part 54), to renew the operating license for the Crystal River Unit 
3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3). Renewal of the license would 
authorize the applicant to operate the facility for an additional 20-
year period beyond the period specified in the current operating 
license. The current operating license for CR-3 expires on December 3, 
2016. CR-3 is a pressurized-water reactor designed by Combustion 
Engineering that is located in Citrus County, Florida. The 
acceptability of the tendered application for docketing, and other 
matters including an opportunity to request a hearing, will be the 
subject of subsequent Federal Register notices.
    Copies of the application are available to the public at the 
Commission's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint 
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852 or through the 
internet from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management 
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room under Accession Number 
ML090080053. The ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room is accessible 
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. In 
addition, the application is available at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html. Persons who do not have 
access to the Internet or who encounter problems in accessing the 
documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff 
at 1-800-397-4209, extension 4737, or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e4f0e6d4fae6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eeefaecdef0ecfdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    A copy of the license renewal application for CR-3 is also 
available to local residents near the site at the Coastal Region 
Library, 8619 W. Crystal St., Crystal River, FL 34428-4468.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of January, 2009.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian E. Holian,
Director, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E9-2323 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
cassi s trave l service s inc

.



### lo s angele s 920 0 Sunse t Blv d Suit e 32 0 Lo s Angele s C A 9006 9 t : 310.246.540 0 f : 310.246.549 9



## ne w yop k 53 5 Fift h Avenu e Suit e 101 0 Ne w Yor k N Y 1001 7 t : 212.333.363 3 f : 212.333.359 5



## londo n 2/4 Circu s Road St.John' s Woo d Londo n N W 8 6P G 207.586.556 6 207.586.909 7 Februar y 24 , 201 0 

## v^Y\'r?CW ' •S1>T0032^00 8

www.travelcts.co m CST R # 1014633-1 0 Tli e Honorabl e Ray LaHoo d

Secretar y Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Subject : Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8
Dear Secretary LaHood : A s adedicate dtrave l partne r o f America n Airlines , I a

mwritin g in support

o f American' s applicatio n t o provid e ne w servic e fromLo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t

at Haneda
. I recogniz e an dapplau dyo u an dth e Obam aadministratio n fo r you r succes s las t Decembe r

in reachin g alandmark

Ope n Skie s agreemen t

wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned at o servic e b y U.S
. airlines
. I encourag e you r

selectio n o f

America n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fromLo s Angele s t o Haned ai n orde r t o provid e a

n essentia l connectio n betwee n tw o o f th e world' s mos t

dynami c commercia l centers . Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o f Japa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore dAmerican' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans
Pacifi c market
. America n i s likewis e committe dt o Lo s Angele s — aworl dcente r

o f business , trade ^ entertainmen t an dtechnolog y ~ an dha s provide dth e city with unsurpasse dai r

servic e fo r

man y decades
. Lo s Angeles , a s wel l a s th e entir e Southern Californi aregio n wil l gai n asignifican t economi c benefi t

fromthes e propose dne w flights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees
. However , w e nee dyou r hel p t o mak e th e LAX/Haned aconnectio n areality. Therefore , I strongl y urg e yo u t o say ye s t o America n Airline s an dit s reques t for slot s t o fl y fro mLo s Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincerely, Cassis/Trave l Services , Inc
. Michel e L
. Mbotgonltr y Presiden t & CE O
§ 1.951 Claims Collection Litigation Report (CCLR). ( a ) Unless excepted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), VA shall complete the CCLR, accompanied by a signed Certificate of Indebtedness, to refer all administratively uncollectible claims to DOJ for litigation. VA shall complete all of the sections of the CCLR appropriate to each claim as required by the CCLR instructions and furnish such other information as may be required in specific cases.
( b ) VA shall indicate clearly on the CCLR the actions it wishes DOJ to take with respect to the referred claim.
( c ) VA shall also use the CCLR to refer claims to DOJ to obtain approval of any proposals to compromise the claims or to suspend or terminate agency collection activity.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)
[69 FR 62200, Oct. 25, 2004]
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

s0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137769

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137769 COA: 284839 Wayne CC: 91-001862-FC DEMETRIUS KNUCKLES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### § 20.500 Rule 500. Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply to legacy appeals, as defined in § 19.2 of this chapter.

[84 FR 183, Jan. 18, 2019]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 545/2005

of 8 April 2005         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2005 for import rights in respect of frozen beef intended for processing may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1206/2004 of 29 June 2004 opening and administering an import tariff quota for frozen beef intended for processing (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005) (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Every application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1206/2004 shall be granted to the following extent, expressed as bone-in beef:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 230, 30.6.2004, p. 42.

(3)OJ L 63, 10.3.2005, p. 20.

----
#### Samuel Diener et al., Respondents, *v.*Adolph Schwab, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1899.)

Replevin — Title in a stranger, connected with the defendant. -

Where the undisputed evidence of the defendant. in an action of replevin tends to show property in a.stranger and' connects the defendant himself with the title, a judgment for the plaintiff cannot ' .be sustained. - ■ 1.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, first district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor- of the plaintiffs. , ''

August P. Wagener,. for appellant.

Louis Levy, for respondents.

MacLean, J.

The action was for wrongful detention of personal property, and the answer a general denial.

The plaintiffs brought replexdn fqr goods which-they had sold and 'delivered"to -ene'Mandel, just previous to Mandel’s failure. .The goods were found in the "possession of .the defendant* who claimed to have bought them acting for another person, "one Eetterer, who testified that he had purchased and paid value for the goods,"in which statement hq was corroborated by the testimony of 'the defendant’s counsel apd clerk. This evidence* tending to show property" in a stranger and connecting the defendant himself therewith, béing in nowise contradicted or discredited, requires *545the reversal of the judgment. Gerber v. Monie, 56 Barb. 652; Stowell v. Otis, *71*N. Y. 36.

Freedman, P. J., concurs; Leventritt, J., concurs 'in result.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
41720.

#### MASSEY v. STEPHENS.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit to recover a judgment for damages allegedly sustained by the plaintiff when his pickup truck was struck from the rear by a “family-purpose car” operated by the defendant’s stepdaughter. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,350; and the plaintiff being dissatisfied with such verdict, appealed to this court from the judgment entered thereon, enumerating as error, (1) the trial court’s refusal to allow the investigat*11ing police officer to testify as to his opinion of the speed of the defendant’s vehicle, and (2) the court’s charge on the doctrine of comparative negligence. *Held:*

Submitted January 11, 1966

Decided January 19, 1966.

*L. B. Kent,*for appellant.

1. The uncontradicted evidence adduced on the trial of this case disclosed that the plaintiff had come to a complete stop in a line of traffic at an intersection in obedience to a traffic light and that after his vehicle had been at rest for approximately 20 seconds, it was struck in the rear by the defendant’s automobile. While the defendant had alleged in his answer to the petition that the sole proximate cause of the collision was the act of the plaintiff in bringing his vehicle to a sudden and abrupt stop without warning, signal or notice of any kind, no evidence whatsoever was introduced in support of this contention, nor was there any evidence adduced on the trial of this case which would have authorized a finding that the plaintiff was negligent in any manner in bringing his vehicle to a stop.

Since it is error to charge on the doctrine of comparative negligence when there is no evidence of such negligence even though the issue of same may have been raised in the defendant’s pleadings *(Beadles v. Bowen,*106 Ga. App. 34, 36 (126 SE2d 254), and cases therein cited), the instruction complained of here was erroneous; and since the verdict rendered by the jury was for an amount less than that sued for, such error was presumptively harmful to the plaintiff and requires the grant of a new trial. *Gleason v. Rhodes Center Pharmacy,*94 Ga. App. 439 (1) (95 SE2d 293).

2. The investigating police officer should have been allowed to testify as to his opinion of the speed of the defendant’s vehicle at the time of impact based upon the data observed by him after the collision with respect to the damage to the vehicles and debris resulting from the collision. *Central Container Corp. v. Westbrook,*105 Ga. App. 855 (4) (126 SE2d 264). Since this case is being reversed on other grounds, it is unnecessary to determine if this error was harmful to the plaintiff.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*12
      *Hatcher, Stubbs, Land & Rothschild, J. Rudolph Jones,*for appellee.
§ 21.186 “Ineligible” status. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of *ineligible* status is to identify the cases in which a veteran requests services under Chapter 31, but the request is denied by VA, usually, on the basis of information developed when the veteran was in *evaluation and planning* status. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)
( b ) *Assignment to ineligible* status. A veteran's case will be assigned to *ineligible* status following a finding by VA that the veteran is not eligible for or entitled to services under Chapter 31. The finding must preclude all possible Chapter 31 services. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106, 3107)
( c ) *Termination of ineligible* status. The assignment of the veteran's case to *ineligible* status should be terminated if the veteran thereafter becomes eligible to receive any Chapter 31 service. Placement of the case in *ineligible* status is a bar to reconsideration of eligibility unless a material change in circumstances occurs.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE SIX MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               44,864,522
<SECURITIES>                                          1,129,284
<RECEIVABLES>                                        22,327,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                            679,000
<INVENTORY>                                          22,697,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     91,600,159
<PP&E>                                               70,380,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                       33,730,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      139,621,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                18,252,400
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                              1,057,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                          119,244,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        139,621,713
<SALES>                                              59,855,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     59,855,125
<CGS>                                                37,647,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        48,392,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      13,546,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                          2,515,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  11,031,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         11,031,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                              1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              1.01





</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. Sprow, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ William R. Sprow

William R. Sprow
Chief Financial Officer
October 13, 2003

13
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48574-48575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: October 6, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Legacy, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Michelle M. Timmerman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 2217, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 301-451-
4573. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7004191d1d15021d111e1d301e191119145e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07736e6a6a62756a66696a47696e666e6329696e6f29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing

[[Page 48575]]

limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-22970 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>