alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901



### Mr. Robert D. Fletcher 

## MAY 1 

## 2 2011 Deputy Executive Officer California Air ResourcesBoard 

### P. 0. Box 2815 Sacrameno, California 95812 Dear

# 3 Jletcher: 

# /' On January 28,2011, 

### the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submittedwith the following rule and found that it fulfills the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.



### This addresses all revisions in this submittal. 

### In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuantto CleanAir Act section 1lo@). APCDIAQMD Sacramento Metropolitan



### Questions regarding our completeness review should be directedto Cynthia G. Allen at (415) 947-4 120.

Director, Air Division Rule #

203



### cc: Mr. Larry 

### Greene, APCO Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Rule Title Preventionof Signiticant Deterioration



### Mr. Michael Guzzetta,Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division

Prinred on Recycled Paper

-.- . .... .. ...

### EPA 

### Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix 

### V Key: 

### C 

### = Complete 

### I 

### = Incomplete 

### NIA 

### = Not ApplicableTo Rule 0 

### = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer January 28,2011 Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD February 9,2011 C.G. Allen



### ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix 

### V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee

- - - - (b) Evidence of adoption X X (c) StatelDistrict legal authority to adopt 

# 1 (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out 

# 1 X 

# 1 1 I 1 X (dl) Copy of actual rulelplan 

# / (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

# 1 X 

# 1 I I I I X 

# 1 I I I I

- - - (f) Copy of public notice X (g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice


### TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix 

### V, Section

### 2.2) I I I I I X 

# / (h) Public comments 

### & agency response 

### ( (a) Regulated pollutants identified 

# 1 N/A 

# 1 1 1 1 1 I I I X


# 1 (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

# 1 X 

# 1 1 1 

# 1 

# / (c) Rulelplan emissions impact

- (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

## 1 (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions 

## I NIA 

## 1 

## 1 1 

## I

(e) Modeling support as appropriate 

# I (g) Evidence of limits 

### & other needed requirements 

# I N/A 

# I NIA NIA 

# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy -

I I I I

Notes: 

# I

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### C
41742.

#### ATLANTA REALTY COMPANY, INC. v. PIASSICK et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. Where a case as laid in an action as amended is not proved, there can be no recovery for the plaintiff. *Code Ann.*§ 81-116, catchwords “Case as laid.”

2. Atlanta Realty Company, Inc., sued two individual defendants to recover damages for the breach of an alleged express agreement by them to pay the plaintiff $3,000 if it procured a purchaser for them who was ready, able and willing to purchase a grocery business owned by the defendants as individuals, the petition alleging that the plaintiff had performed its undertaking to procure such a purchaser. There was a *234conflict in the evidence as to whether the alleged contract was entered into, but assuming that it was, the evidence demanded a verdict for the defendants because it showed that after the time of the alleged contract the defendants incorporated the grocery business and one of the defendants sold his half of the stock in the corporation to the purchaser allegedly procured by the plaintiff. The cause of action is joint and the evidence fails to show a performance of the contract by the plaintiff in that the entire grocery business was not sold and no prospective purchaser offered to buy it on the terms made by the defendants. There being no evidence to authorize a recoveiy by the plaintiff on the joint cause of action against both defendants, the court, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, correctly found for the defendants.

Argued February 7, 1966

Decided March 2, 1966.

*Gilbert, Patton & Carter, Fred A. Gilbert,*for appellant.

*Parks & Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
#### § 20.111 Rule 111. Legal holidays.

For the purpose of Rule 110 (§ 20.110), the legal holidays, in addition to any other day appointed as a holiday by the President or the Congress of the United States, are as follows: New Year's Day—January 1; Inauguration Day—January 20 of every fourth year or, if the 20th falls on a Sunday, the next succeeding day selected for public observance of the inauguration; Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.—Third Monday in January; Washington's Birthday—Third Monday in February; Memorial Day—Last Monday in May; Independence Day—July 4; Labor Day—First Monday in September; Columbus Day—Second Monday in October; Veterans Day—November 11; Thanksgiving Day—Fourth Thursday in November; and Christmas Day—December 25. When a holiday occurs on a Saturday, the Friday immediately before is the legal public holiday. When a holiday occurs on a Sunday, the Monday immediately after is the legal public holiday.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 6103)

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 182, Jan. 18, 2019]
§ 21.5067 Death of participant. ( a ) *Disposition of unused contributions.* If an individual dies, the Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay the amount of his or her unused contributions to the fund to the living person or persons in the order listed in this paragraph. ( 1 ) The beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the individual under the individual's Servicemen's Group Life Insurance policy;
( 2 ) The surviving spouse of the individual;
( 3 ) The surviving child or children of the individual, in equal shares;
( 4 ) The surviving parent or parents of the individual in equal shares.
( b ) *Payments to the individual's estate.* If none of the persons listed in paragraph (a) of this section is living, the Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay the amount of the individual's unused contributions to the fund to the individual's estate. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3224)
( c ) *Payments of accrued benefits.* Educational assistance remaining due and unpaid at the date of the veteran's death is payable under the provisions of § 3.1000 of this chapter. For this purpose accrued benefits include the portion of the benefit represented by the individual's contribution as well as the portion included by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5121)
[47 FR 51745, Nov. 17, 1982]
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000009 01-JUL-2013 08:32 AM

SCWC-12-0000009 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. CHAD GETZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000009; CR. NO. 11-1-0608) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 17, 2013, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, July 1, 2013. Summer M.M. Kupau for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
§ 16.114 Cooperative Research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
§ 1.944 Discharge of indebtedness; reporting requirements. ( a ) Before discharging a delinquent debt (also referred to as a close out of the debt), VA shall take all appropriate steps to collect the debt in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(g), including, as applicable, administrative offset, tax refund offset, Federal salary offset, referral to Treasury or Treasury-designated debt collection centers or private collection contractors, credit bureau reporting, wage garnishment, litigation, and foreclosure. Discharge of indebtedness is distinct from termination or suspension of collection activity under §§ 1.940 through 1.943 and is governed by the Internal Revenue Code (see 26 U.S.C. 6050P). When collection action on a debt is suspended or terminated, the debt remains delinquent and further collection action may be pursued at a later date in accordance with the standards set forth in §§ 1.900 through 1.953. When VA discharges a debt in full or in part, further collection action is prohibited. Therefore, VA should make the determination that collection action is no longer warranted before discharging a debt. Before discharging a debt, VA must terminate debt collection action.
( b ) Upon discharge of an indebtedness, VA must report the discharge to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in accordance with the requirements of 26 U.S.C. 6050P and 26 CFR 1.6050P-1. VA may request Treasury or Treasury-designated debt collection centers to file such a discharge report to the IRS on VA's behalf.
( c ) When discharging a debt, VA must request that any liens of record securing the debt be released.
( d ) 31 U.S.C. 3711(i)(2) requires agencies to sell a delinquent nontax debt upon termination of collection action if the Secretary of the Treasury determines such a sale is in the best interests of the United States. Since the discharge of a debt precludes any further collection action (including the sale of a delinquent debt), VA may not discharge a debt until the requirements of § 3711(i)(2) have been met.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)
[69 FR 62200, Oct. 25, 2004]
#### § 17.800 Purpose.

The purpose of the Transitional Housing Loan Program regulations is to establish application provisions and selection criteria for loans to non-profit organizations for use in initial startup costs for transitional housing for veterans who are in (or have recently been in) a program for the treatment of substance abuse. This program is intended to increase the amount of transitional housing available for such veterans who need a period of supportive housing to encourage sobriety maintenance and reestablishment of social and community relationships.
41993.

#### HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al. v. PARSLEY.

Submitted May 4, 1966

Decided May 26, 1966

Rehearing denied June 14, 1966.

*Woodruff, Saveli, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams,*for appellants.

*Telford, Wayne & Greer, Dent Bostick, Robinson, Thompson, Buice & Harben, Sam S. Harben,*for appellee.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. There is no coverage under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act unless there is a relation of employer and employee. *Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*174 Ga. 525 (163 SE 159). “In determining whether or not the relationship of master and servant prevails in a compensation case, the same principles that exist under the common law obtain.” *Travelers Ins. Co. v. Clark,*58 Ga. App. 115, 121 (197 SE 650). Where there is a relationship of independent contractor and contractee no coverage is afforded. *Richards v. Marco Realty Co.,*57 Ga. App. 242 (194 SE 880). 2. The facts in this case are strikingly similar to those in *National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Undercofler,*109 Ga. App. 703, 709 (2) (137 SE2d 328), where it was held that “the status of these individuals, when viewed in the light of common law principles, was clearly that of independent contractor, and not that of employee.” And see *Poss Bros. Lumber Co. v. Haynie,*37 Ga. App. 60 (139 SE 127); *Cooper v. Dixie Constr. Co.,*45 Ga. App. 420 (165 SE 152); *Durham Land Co. v. Kilgore,*56 Ga. App. 785 (194 SE 49); *Lokey & Simpson v. Hightower,*57 Ga. App. 577 (196 SE 210); *Malcom v. Sudderth,*98 Ga. App. 674, 686 (106 SE2d 367). We find no application of any erroneous legal theory in the award of the board denying compensation, and the judgment of the superior court reversing the award, which is amply supported by evidence must be

*Reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RAMON GOMEZ-MALDONADO, a/k/a Fidel, a/k/a Pepe, Defendant - Appellant. No. 15-5054 (D.C. No. 4:14-CR-00132-GKF-1) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HARTZ , EBEL , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

Pursuant to a plea agreement with a broad appeal waiver, Ramon GomezMaldonado pleaded guilty to one count of c onspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. The district court sentenced him to 121 months’ imprisonment, which was at the low end of the advisory guideline range of 121 to 151 months. Despite his appeal waiver , Mr. Gomez-Maldonado filed a notice of

* This panel has determined that oral ar gument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It ma y be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32. 1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 17, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United States

v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

Counsel for Mr. Gomez-Maldonado file d a response stati ng a belief that opposition to the motion to enforce would be frivolous and moved to withdraw. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Gi ven these circumstances, we gave Mr. Gomez-Maldonado an opportunity to file a pro se response to the motion,

see id . He did not f ile a response.

In Hahn , 359 F.3d at 1325, we held that we would enforce appeal waivers as long as three conditions were met: (1) the matter on appeal “falls within the scope of the waiver”; (2) the defendant-appellant “knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights”; and (3) enfo rcing the waiver will not “r esult in a miscarriage of justice.” We have conducted an i ndependent examination of the record, see Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, and we agree with th e government that Mr. Gomez-Maldonado’s appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the wa iver was knowing and voluntary, and enforcing the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, we grant the motion to enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss th is appeal. We also grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
|   | (i) | the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     Dated:  February 8, 2011 |   |   | /s/PHILLIP A. KAGEL                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |   |   | Phillip A. Kagel                                    |
|                                                       |   |   | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                       |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        |
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.103 Diligence.

A practitioner shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM TOFUTTI
BRANDS  INC.'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.

<ARTICLE>                     5




<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                   1,408,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,671,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               178,000
<INVENTORY>                                636,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,456,000
<PP&E>                                      59,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              59,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,796,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      689,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    63,000
<OTHER-SE>                               3,031,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,796,000
<SALES>                                  9,326,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         9,326,000
<CGS>                                    5,945,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,945,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,133,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,248,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               497,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               751,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10



</TABLE>
#### § 1.895 Review and evaluation.

The part-time career employment program will be reviewed through regular employment reports to determine levels of part-time employment. This program will also be designated an item of special interest to be reviewed during personnel management reviews.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 3402)

[61 FR 38571, July 25, 1996]
2/15/2015 Version 1.2 SkyFire Services LLC

====== UAV FIXED WING PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST =======

1. Ensure aircraft assembled properly, Battery is in place but NOT CONNECTED, Check CG, Inspect Airframe & PITOT Tube for any damage

2. Transmitter on - *** Ensure CORRECT MODEL SELECTED ***

3. Move Transmitter switches to NEUTRAL / OFF Positions, *** THROTTLE OFF ***

4. Move aircraft to launch point, Install RF Lost Plane Finder, then Connect Battery to aircraft, Plug in Battery Alarm. 

 After startup ensure all control surfaces operate in MAN mode. Then test stabilized control surface movements.

5. Test RF Lost Plane Finder beacon

6. Connect Ground Station (GCS) laptop to aircraft and ensure Telemetry feed

7. Ensure OSD battery reading indicates a full battery.

8. Ensure GPS 3D lock (> 6 satellites).

9. Cycle through each flight mode using Transmitter switches, ensure GCS reads correctly. *** CAUTION in RETL mode – spinning Prop

10. Lost Link Test – turn off Transmitter and ensure RETL mode is engaged. *** CAUTION SPINNING PROP ***

11. Start GCS DVR recorder

12. Start HD Video Camera on aircraft

13. Ensure strobes are ON

14. Prepare for Launch – ensure takeoff into wind. 

15. Observer grasps aircraft safely, stretches back bungee until sufficient tension for launch achieved. 

16. PIC announces ‘Launch!’. When Observer hears this they release aircraft.

17. PIC engages motor once bungee cord drops away from aircraft. Climb to 200’ AGL and engage Loiter.

18. PIC tests RETL/Lost Link – ensures aircraft engages RETL mode and circles over ‘Home Position’.

19. PIC announces: ‘Proceeding with Mission!’