alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.68 Declaration in lieu of oath.

Any document to be filed in the Patent and Trademark Office and which is required by any law, rule, or other regulation to be under oath may be subscribed to by a written declaration. Such declaration may be used in lieu of the oath otherwise required, if, and only if, the declarant is on the same document, warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C. 1001) and may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issuing thereon. The declarant must set forth in the body of the declaration that all statements made of the declarant's own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

[49 FR 48452, Dec. 12, 1984]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 18b.95 Filing of ex parte communications.

A prohibited communication in writing received by the Secretary, the reviewing authority, or by the presiding officer, shall be made public by placing it in the correspondence file of the docket in the case and will not be considered as part of the record for decision. If the prohibited communication is received orally, a memorandum setting forth its substance shall be made and filed in the correspondence section of the docket in the case. A person referred to in such memorandum may file a comment for inclusion in the docket if the memorandum is considered to be incorrect.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10387, Mar. 26, 1986]
#### J. Charles Dicken *v.*The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines, Appellant.

Argued Oct. 19, 1908.

Appeal, No. 15, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court April T., 1907, No. 184, affirming decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 600, on bill in equity in case of J. Charles Dicken v. The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines.

Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

January 4, 1909:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed in Davis v. The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines, ante, p. 56.
|   | (i) | the      quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      September 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      4, 2009 |   |   | /s/PHILLIP A. KAGEL                                      |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |   | Phillip      A. Kagel                                    |
|                                    |   |   | Vice      President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)        |
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Qatar National Day

# 									Qatar National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 18, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our best wishes to the State of Qatar as you celebrate your National Day.

I am thankful for Qatar’s continuing friendship and partnership, which continues to broaden and deepen to the benefit of both countries. I want to express my gratitude for Qatar’s key role as a mediator in efforts to secure the release of unjustly detained Americans in Iran in September, and hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. These efforts reflect a shared U.S. and Qatari commitment to promote security and stability in the Middle East and beyond.

Please accept my warmest congratulations on this special occasion.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsQatarThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
41900.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. KNOX.

Eberhakdt, Judge.

1. After verdict the evidence should be construed to uphold it. *Y.M.C.A. v. Bailey,*112 Ga. App. 684, 690 (136 SE2d 324). Where an expert witness testifying as to the value of land taken did not specifically state that he was referring to the date of the taking in giving his opinion as to value, but in testifying located and identified the land on a plat of the proposed highway, stating that he was familiar with land values in that area, and with other transactions in that general area, the evidence should be construed to refer to the time of taking, and its admission was not error. Moreover, as an additional reason for so construing it, we note that there was other evidence in the record placing the value at the time of taking at an amount equal to or in excess of that stated by this expert.

In any event, the portion of the testimony describing the area in which the land is located relative to the availability of city water, its proximity to an airport, the beautification that had been accomplished on it, the presence of a nearby recreation area, etc., was relevant for consideration - in determining the value as of the date of taking, for they obviously had not been matters appearing after the taking, and even if his evidence fixing value could not be construed to refer to the particular date of taking, an objection to the entire deposition or a motion to exclude it in its entirety must fail because some of the evidence was relevant and admissible. *Goddard v. Boyd,*144 Ga. 18 (2) (85 SE 1013); *MacGregor v. Roux,*198 Ga. 520 (2b) (32 SE2d 289); *State Hwy. Dept. v. Jackson,*100 Ga. App. 704, 705 (112 SE2d 356), and citations.

*608Argued April 4, 1966

Decided April 14, 1966

Rehearing denied May 10, 1966.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, James H. Wood, Assistant Attorneys General, D. Field Yow, Lon L. Fleming, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Knox, Warren D. Evans,*for appellee.

2. Where counsel for the condemnee in his argument to the jury referred to the condemnee as a civic-minded man who had done much for the community and a motion for mistrial was made on the ground that the argument, wholly unsupported by evidence, was calculated to- be prejudicial and harmful, and the court, overruling the motion, admonished the jury to disabuse their minds of the argument and give it no effect in their considerations, no error appears. *Southern Poultry Co. v. Fletcher,*113 Ga. App. 374 (147 SE2d 870). There was no renewal of the motion, after overruling, and this enumeration of error raises no question for decision. *Kendrick v. Kendrick,*218 Ga. 460 (4) (128 SE2d 496).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert S. Kendall, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sentex SensingTechnology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 28, 2004   /s/ Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive OfficerSignature & Title   
11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Army announces the general availability of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to Journal Bearing Analysis Suite computer modeling code. See this link for a description of the suite and its capabilities:                         *http://www.grc.nasa.gov/​WWW/​SurfSci/​JournalBearings/​main-text.html.*                         Any license shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: AMSRD-ARL-DP-P/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-22552 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of TCW Direct Lending VIII LLC (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard T. Miller, as President of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Richard T. Miller
|Name:                 |  | Richard T. Miller
|Title:                |  | President        
|Date:                 |  | March 28, 2022   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.45 Amendment of pleadings.

The OED Director may, without Committee on Discipline authorization, but with the authorization of the hearing officer, amend the complaint to include additional charges based upon conduct committed before or after the complaint was filed. If amendment of the complaint is authorized, the hearing officer shall authorize amendment of the answer. Any party who would otherwise be prejudiced by the amendment will be given reasonable opportunity to meet the allegations in the complaint or answer as amended, and the hearing officer shall make findings on any issue presented by the complaint or answer as amended.
#### § 233.1 General.

This part prescribes rules pertaining to the management of the Copyright Claims Board's (Board's) docket and prevention of abuse of the Board's proceedings.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00402-CV

Annette Cooper, Appellant

v.

Brad Cooper, Appellee 

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 19,008, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES, III, JUDGE PRESIDING 

Appellant Annette Cooper has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal. She represents that 

appellee agrees with her motion.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**KENDALE L. WISE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 198 MM 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 27th day of January, 2015, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is** DENIED

**.**
**Exhibit 32
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934**

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Frank P. Marino,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(IPALCO), each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO.
          Date:November 7, 2007By: /s/ Ann D. Murtlow    Ann D. Murtlow    *President and Chief Executive Officer*                Date:November 7, 2007By: /s/ Frank P. Marino    Frank P. Marino    *Senior Vice President and*    *Chief Financial Officer 
A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.***
HomeOffice of Civil RightsRemarks & Releases...NO FEAR Act For 3rd Quarter 2019

# 									NO FEAR Act For 3rd Quarter 2019							

Report

Office of Civil Rights

August 6, 2019

						Download Report												[470 KB]

**Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act:**

**HQ/SOCR (and below)**

For 3rd Quarter 2019 for period ending June 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags

Civil RightsDiscriminationEqual OpportunityNo FEAR ActOffice of Civil Rights

Back to Top
#### Henry Brien, Respondent, *v.*Guiseppe Romano, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

April, 1899.)

Dispossession of monthly tenant holding over in the city of Hew York — Hotice of termination of tenancy.

Proof of due service of the written statutory notice of five days, that the landlord elects to terminate the tenancy of a monthly tenant in the city of New York, who holds over his term, is a condition precedent to the granting of a final order of dispossession.

Appeal from a final order, in favor of the landlord, made in . a summary proceeding in the- Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough, of Manhattan, for the tenth district.

Martin Wechsler, for appellant.

Richard B. Kelly, for respondent.

Leventritt, J.

The landlord instituted summary proceedings against the tenant, alleging that he was holding over on a monthly tenancy. The petition besides reciting the customary facts sets forth that the statutory notice in writing to the effect that the landlord elected to terminate the tenancy, had been duly served on the tenant five days .before the expiration of the alleged term. The answer denied every allegation of the petition, except that the respondent was the landlord of the' premises. At the trial no proof whatever was offered of the service of this notice. This 'defect of proof has in this court but recently been held to constitute substantial and reversible error (Hedden v. Nederburg, 25 Misc. Rep. 722; 55 N. Y. Supp. 613), and following.that and kindred decisions (Tolman v. Heading, 11 App. Div. 264; Beach v. Bainbridge, 7 Hun, 81; Posson v. Dean, 8 Civ. Pro. 177), we must reverse the order. '

Fbeedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant ■to abide event.