alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[57 C. Cls. 277; 265 U. S. 209]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

For the purpose of securing the reduced rates for transportation of its property over land-grant railroads, the Government purchased goods for prices f. o. b. at place of shipment, paid the freight, and had shipment made by the sellers with government bills of lading. *Held,*that title passed at place of shipment, although the contracts of sale reserved to the Government the right of inspection and rejection at the place of destination and imposed certa'n duties there upon the sellers, and that goods so transported, and accepted by the Government, were entitled to the reduced rates of transportation.

Mr. Justice McKeNNA

delivered the opinion of the Supreme court May 26, 1924.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Venugopal Rathi, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of SL INVESTMENT CORP. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





• the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 21, 2022/s/ Venugopal RathiVenugopal RathiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





* The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extractecd from the
Morgan Keegan, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1999, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,494
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,467
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            504,574
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           18,696
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            593,961
<PP&E>                                          24,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,783,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                   298,400
<PAYABLES>                                     811,087
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   170,650
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              4,848
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              97,993
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,039
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,783,663
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               41,007
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            20,812
<COMMISSIONS>                                   32,739
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    9,276
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   10,694
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,896
<COMPENSATION>                                  60,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,700
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37



</TABLE>
#### William J. ANDERSON v. The PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.

No. 14199.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 24, 1963.

Decided May 8, 1963.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1963.

Gordon E. Neuenschwander, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Thomas C. Jones, McKeesport, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALQDNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion for a new trial and/or judgment N.O.V. will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Rosenberg in his Memorandum Opinion filed August 29, 1962, 217 F.Supp. 956.
NO. 07-09-0039-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JUNE 3, 2009

______________________________

JASON E. STEELY, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2007-417068; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Jason E. Steely, was convicted by a jury

of possession of a controlled substance, a state jail felony. The jury sentenced Appellant

to nineteen months in a state jail facility. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have both

been filed. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on April 16, 2009, but has yet to be filed.
2

Neither has a motion for extension of time been filed. By letter dated April 29, 2009, this

Court notified Appellant’s appointed counsel, Kelly Clark, of the defect and explained that

failure to file the brief by May 11, 2009, would result in the appeal being abated and the

cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2)

and (3). Counsel did not respond to the Court’s notice nor file Appellant’s brief.

Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to

determine the following: 

1. whether Appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel

given appointed counsel’s failure to file a brief;

2. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal; and, if so

3. whether appointed counsel should be removed and new counsel

appointed to pursue this appeal.

Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue the appeal and the trial

court determines Appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel or has retained new

counsel, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of the newlyappointed or newly-retained counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court. Finally,

the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders

it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and

orders, if any, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental reporter’s
3

record of the hearing, if any, shall also be included in the appellate record. Finally, the trial

court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record, if

any, with the Clerk of this Court by July 15, 2009.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 61 FR 7217, Feb. 27, 1996, and 86 FR 51275, Sept. 15, 2021.

#### § 36.4287 Substitution of trustees.

In jurisdictions in which valid, any deed of trust or mortgage securing a guaranteed loan, if it names trustees or confers a power of sale otherwise, shall contain a provision empowering any holder of the indebtedness to appoint substitute trustees or other person with such power to sell, who shall succeed to all the rights, powers, and duties of the trustees, or other person, originally designated.
#### § 20.708 Rule 708. Witness at hearings.

The testimony of witnesses, including appellants, will be heard. All testimony must be given under oath or affirmation. Oath or affirmation is not required for the sole purpose of presenting contentions and argument.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7105(a), 7107)

[61 FR 29028, June 7, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 187, Jan. 18, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,330
<INVENTORY>                                     37,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,499
<PP&E>                                         212,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 466,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,733
<BONDS>                                        236,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,280
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   466,277
<SALES>                                        180,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          142,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# About
GFDL



---

|Overview

Introduction

Full-color
Tour

The
Science of GFDL

Gallery
GFDL
  Organization Chart                                                                                                                | News and Events

News Releases

"Science
and Nonscience Concerning Human-Caused Climate Warming" 
by Jerry Mahlman

Mahlman Symposium

Kurihara
Symposium

Manabe Symposium

Latest Annual
Report
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Accomplishments and Plans

Major Laboratory
Accomplishments

Laboratory Awards

Annual Reports On-line

FY99/00

FY98/99

FY97/98Recent
Program Accomplishments and Current Activites

FY97 Operating Plan
|Postdoctoral
Research Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University                                                                                                                                  



---

| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  |
nfk i dk 1‘

WA E. TA EFF, CHAIRM 

COMMISSION ON PRACTICE 

COMMISSION ON PRACTICE 

301 S. Park Ave., Suite 328 

P.O. Box 203002 

FILED 

09/30/2024 

Helena, Montana 59620-3002 

Phone: (406) 841-2976 

COMMISSION ON PRACTICE 

OF THE SUPREME COURT 

OF THE STA TE OF MONTANA 

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON PRACTICE OF THE 

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

IN THE MATTER OF MARTHA L. GOODLOE, ) Supreme Court No. PR 24-0299 

) ODC File No. 23-139 

An Attorney ) at Law, 

Respondent. ) ORDER TO VACATE AND CONTINUE 

) PUBLIC ADMONITION

) 

) 

-------------------) 

On September 23, 2024, the Respondent filed a Request for Continuance of the Public 

Admonition that is scheduled for October 8, 2024, at 11 :30 a.m., before the Commission on 

Practice. Prior to receiving the Order to Appear for Public Admonition, Respondent had agreed 

to meet with a client and three other businessmen from out of state that had already purchased 

plane tickets and made hotel reservations. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Pamela Bucy, was 

contacted by Respondent, and has no objection to the Continuance. With good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Public Admonition set for October 8, 2024, at 

11:30 a.m., is hereby Vacated, and will be scheduled at a time to be determined by subsequent

Notice served at least 20 days prior to the January 8 - 10, 2025 Commission meeting dates. 

DATED this 30th day of September, 2024. 

Order to Vacate and Continue Public Admonition Page 1 .11 

09/30/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0299
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of September, 2024, I served a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing document by email to the following: 

Martha L. Goodloe 

Attorney at Law 

1603 Jackson Street 

Missoula, MT 59802 

goipclawazmail.corn 

Pam Bucy 

Chief Disciplinaiy Counsel 

P.O. Box 1099 

Helena, MT 59624-1099 

obucy@montanaodc.org 

Order to Vacate and Continue Public Admonition Page 2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Shelly Smith, hereby certify that I have served true and accurate copies of the foregoing Other 

- Other to the following on 09-30-2024:

Martha L. Goodloe (Attorney)

1603 Jackson Street

Missoula MT 59802

Representing: Martha L. Goodloe

Service Method: eService

Pamela D. Bucy (Attorney)

P.O. Box 1099

Helena MT 59624

Representing: Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Service Method: eService

Ward E. Taleff (Attorney)

300 River Drive North,

Suite 5

GREAT FALLS MT 59401

Service Method: eService

E-mail Address: mick@mtresolutelaw.com

 Electronically Signed By: Shelly Smith

Dated: 09-30-2024
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002:     I, Dean Antonis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report.     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or itsreasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.      /s/ Dean Antonis     Dean Antonis  Title: President (Principal Executive Officer)  Date: May 15, 2006
- Home
- Leadership
- Resources
- Remarks and Releases
- Assembly of Local Leaders
- State-to-States Initiative
- Contact Us

HomeSubnational Diplomacy Unit...Remarks and Releases – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy

# 						Remarks and Releases – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy					

38 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenBrian A. NicholsNed PriceNina Hachigian

Select a LocationColombiaGermanyPeruRussiaSpainUkraine

Select a Release TypeDipNoteFPC BriefingMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleaseOther U.S. Government ReleasePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateForeign Press CentersGlobal Engagement CenterOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of Global PartnershipsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Chicago, Illinois	  Ned PriceJanuary 18, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Strengthening Foreign Policy Through Subnational Diplomacy [YouTube]	  Nina HachigianJanuary 17, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Hachigian to Participate in the United States Conference of Mayors’ 91st Winter Meeting	  January 16, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Special Representative Hachigian’s Travel to Richmond, Virginia	  November 3, 2022 
          -    		Nina Hachigian	  October 12, 2022 
          -    		Subnational Diplomacy Unit	  October 11, 2022 
          -    Other U.S. Government Release  		Reps Lieu and Wilson Applaud State Department’s New Subnational Diplomacy Office	  October 3, 2022 
          -    Press Statement  		Naming Ambassador Nina Hachigian as Special Representative for Subnational Diplomacy	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 3, 2022 

previous page1234

Back to Top
#### Matter of Edward W. Braffett.

(Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,

May, 1899.)

Brooklyn Disciplinary Training School — A child, merely disorderly, cannot be detained — Habeas corpus.

A child' cannot, under Laws of 1896, chap. 235, as amended by Laws of 1897, chap. 508, be committed to the Brooklyn Disciplinary Training School, unless he has been arrested or committed as a vagrant or convicted of a criminal offense other, than a felony, and hence his commitment for the adjudged cause that he “ was a disorderly child who deserts his home without sufficient cause, and keeps company with dissolute and vicious persons, against the lawful command of his father, and is bad, ungovernable and disorderly beyond his father’s control ” affords no ground for his detention by the institution • and he will be discharged on *habeas corpus.*

Writ of habeas corpus for the discharge of the petitioner from imprisonment in the Brooklyn Disciplinary Training School.

M. P. Lynch for petitioner.

Percy R. Chittenden opposed.- ■

Gaynor, J.:

The petitioner, who is thirteen years old, is confined in the said institution under a magistrate’s commitment. The adjudged cause -stated therein is that, he *“*was a disorderly child who deserts his home without sufficient cause, and keeps company with dissolute and vicious persons, against the lawful command of his father, and is bad, ungovernable and disorderly beyond his father’s control.” Chapter 23.5 of the laws of 1896, as amended by chapter 508 of .the laws of 1897, authorizes boys between the ages of four and fourteen years to be received in the sáid institute “ who shall be arrested or committed as vagrants or convicted of criminal offenses other than felonies ” in the city of Brooklyn. The petitioner has not been found to be a vagrant and committed as such. The words of the commitment do not bring him within the definition of a vagrant (Penal Code, sec. 291; Criminal Code, sec. 887). ¡Nor has lie been tried and convicted *330of any.“ criminal offense ”. His commitment was therefore without authority of law. The said words of the commitment are taken from chapter 172 of the laws of 1865 (sec. 5), but that statute only authorizes commitments to the House of Refuge in the City of New York.

The petitioner is discharged.