alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Lakhdhir, Kamala Shirin – Republic of Indonesia – November 2023

# 									Lakhdhir, Kamala Shirin – Republic of Indonesia – November 2023							

Certificate of Competency

November 6, 2023

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                         Republic of Indonesia

CANDIDATE:             Kamala Shirin Lakhdhir

Kamala Shirin Lakhdhir, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, was most recently the Executive Secretary of the Department of State.  She is a former Ambassador to Malaysia.  She has served as Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, and Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs.  A recognized expert on East Asian affairs, Lakhdhir’s extensive senior foreign policy experience in Washington and overseas demonstrates that she is well-qualified to serve as Ambassador to the Republic of Indonesia.

Lakhdhir served as U.S. Consul General at Consulate General Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.  She has served as Director of the Office of Maritime Southeast Asia, which includes responsibility for U.S. relations with Indonesia, and was a political officer in U.S. Embassy Beijing.  She also served as a Pearson Fellow in the House International Relations Committee’s Asia and Pacific Subcommittee, and the House Financial Services Committee’s International Monetary Policy and Trade Subcommittee.  Early in her career, she was Deputy Coordinator of the Taiwan Coordination Staff in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, and a Line Officer in the Department’s Executive Secretariat.  Other overseas assignments were in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia.

Lakhdhir earned a B.A. from Harvard College and an M.S. from the National War College.  She has won numerous Department of State performance awards.  Her languages are Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, and Bahasa Indonesia.

Back to Top
Last Updated:  22 July 1996National Domestic Violence Hotline:  1-800-799-SAFETDD for the Hearing Impaired:  1-800-787-3224What Can You Say to a Victim?- I'm afraid for your safety. I'm afraid for the safety of your children.
It will only get worse.
We're here for you when you when you are ready or when you are able to leave.
You deserve better than this.
Let's figure out a safety plan for you.
Adapted from: Sarah Buel, Esq., in "Courts and Communities: Confronting Violence in theFamily," Conference Highlights, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, 1994.

Return to the Violence Against Women Home Page
#### § 14.562 Collections or adjustments.

When it is determined that a submission is to be made to the U.S. Attorney, no demand for payment or adjustment will be made without the advice of the U.S. Attorney. However, if, before or after submission, the potential defendant or other person tenders payment of the liability to the United States, payment will be accepted if the U.S. Attorney has no objection. If the U.S. Attorney determines that prosecution is not indicated, or when prosecution has ended, the file will be returned to the appropriate office with a report as to the action taken.

[42 FR 41413, Aug. 17, 1977]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 7.25 Sections of part 2 applicable to extension of protection.

(a) Except for §§ 2.21, 2.22, 2.76, 2.88, 2.89, 2.130, 2.131, 2.160 through 2.166, 2.168, 2.173, 2.175, and 2.181 through 2.186, all sections in parts 2 and 11 of this chapter shall apply to an extension of protection of an international registration to the United States, including sections related to proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, unless otherwise stated.

(b) The Office will refer to a request for an extension of protection to the United States as an application under section 66(a) of the Act, and references to applications and registrations in part 2 of this chapter include extensions of protection to the United States.

(c) Upon registration in the United States under section 69 of the Act, an extension of protection to the United States is referred to as a registration, a registered extension of protection, or a section 66(a) registration.

[68 FR 55769, Sept. 26, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 57186, Sept. 24, 2004; 70 FR 38774, July 6, 2005; 73 FR 47686, Aug. 14, 2008; 73 FR 67776, Nov. 17, 2008; 75 FR 35977, June 24, 2010; 78 FR 20197, Apr. 3, 2013; 80 FR 2313, Jan. 16, 2015; 84 FR 37099, July 31, 2019]
§ 14.504 Domestic relations questions, authority and exceptions. ( a ) Regional Counsels have the same authority with respect to domestic relations questions as they do with respect to matters covered by § 14.503 except as specifically excluded by the provisions of paragraph (a) of that section.
( b ) In the following instances the Regional Counsel, regardless of whether State law is wholly controlling or a Department of Veterans Affairs precedent is available, will prepare a tentative opinion, researched as completely as possible with reasonably available facilities, and forward two copies thereof directly to the General Counsel for review and disposition (as provided in § 14.503 respecting other than domestic relations matters): ( 1 ) Where it is not clear under applicable State law: ( i ) Whether the marriage of a veteran's child or the remarriage of a veteran's widow was void without decree of annulment, or
( ii ) whether an annulment decree was rendered by a court with basic authority to render annulment decrees;
( 2 ) When fraud or collusion by either party appears to have influenced the granting of an annulment decree;
( 3 ) Cases in which there are contesting claims;
( 4 ) Unusual situations, such as those involving proxy marriages, the law of two or more jurisdictions or of a foreign country;
( 5 ) Cases involving difference of opinion between Regional Counsels or between a Regional Counsel and the official who submitted the question involved.
[42 FR 41411, Aug. 17, 1977]
#### § 18b.60 Objections.

Objections to evidence shall be timely and briefly state the ground relied upon.
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.1 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership (the Managing General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer of the Managing General Partner, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITT President and Chief Executive Officer November 10, 2005/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLER Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer November 10, 2005
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2361 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the credit for 

renewable diesel in the case of fuel coproduced with petroleum, natural 

gas, or coal feedstocks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2007 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

ANDREWS, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. CARNAHAN, 

Ms. CARSON, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. EMANUEL, 

Mr. FARR, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, 

Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. INSLEE, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. KIND, 

Ms. LEE, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. 

OBERSTAR, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SOLIS, 

Mr. STARK, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. WATSON, Mr. WELCH of Vermont, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. 

WATERS, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow 

the credit for renewable diesel in the case of fuel coproduced with petroleum, natural gas, or coal feedstocks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2361 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Renewable 

3 Energy Tax Credit Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF RENEWABLE DIESEL CREDIT 

5 FOR FUEL COPRODUCED WITH CERTAIN 

6 FEEDSTOCKS. 

7 (a) COPRODUCTION WITH PETROLEUM FEED8 STOCK.—Paragraph (3) of section 40A(f) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining renewable diesel) is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following flush sen11 tence: 

12 ‘‘Such term does not include any fuel derived from 

13 coprocessing biomass with a feedstock which is not 

14 biomass. For purposes of this paragraph, the term 

15 ‘biomass’ has the meaning given such term by sec16 tion 45K(c)(3).’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 40A(f)(3) 

18 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘(as defined in sec19 tion 45K(c)(3))’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to fuel produced after June 30, 

22 2007. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
**Sandoval-Santa Fe Survey Area
 **
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert S. Kendall, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and
6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: October 13, 2003
/s/ Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer
#### The People ex rel. John B. Kleet et al., Relators, *v.*Town Board of the Town of West Turin, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Onondaga Special Term,

May, 1899.)

Towns — Compensation of election officers not increased for long hours of work.

Although town election officers have worked from about half-past 5 O’clock ih -the morning until nearly midnight of the day of a general . election, they are entitled to only one day’s pay under the Town Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 569, § 178, as amended by Laws of 1897, chap. 252), as the statuté, fixing the number- of hours which shall constitute . a day’s work, has no application to such officers..

Application for a writ of mandamus.

E. M. Bagg, for relators.

C. S. Mereness, for'defendant.

Hiscock, J.

The relators were election officers in the town of West Turin and served as such at the general election in November, 1898. They worked until a little before 12 o’clock midnight of that day in completing their labors, and the. only question presented in this matter is Whether they are entitled to compensation for more than one day. -

It seems to me'clearly that they are not. The statutes required that the polls upon election day should be opened from 6 o’clock, a. h., until ,5 o’clock, p. h. It required that these relators- as election officials should be present at least half an hour before the polls' opened, and imposed on. them the discharge of certain duties which necessarily, required-work-after the polls closed. Section 178 of chapter 569 of the Laws of 1890, as. amended by chapter- 25,2 of the Laws of 1897, provides that -relators “ for each day actually and necessarily devoted by them ”• to the discharge of their duties shall. *471receive two dollars per day in the absence of action by the board of supervisors fixing their compensation at a higher rate, which concededly was not done. They performed all of their services before midnight upon election day. The law fixing the number of hours which shall constitute a day’s work by its terms manifestly does not apply to relators. This being so, they have no right to divide the ordinary and legal day of twenty-four hours into two or three days and receive compensation therefor.

It is not necessary here to decide whether an election officer would be entitled to compensation for more than one day if the discharge of his duties fairly warranted an adjournment over until the second day and such adjournment Was actually taken. In this case no such adjournment was taken and the services Were completed on the first day.

It very likely may be that the relators have been called upon to work for many more hours than would constitute a reasonable day’s work. But under the facts as they are presented there does not seem to be opportunity for relief in these proceedings, and furthermore, as appears by the facts as submitted, the town board have awarded them extra compensation.

Ordered accordingly.
#### § 14.805 Contents of a demand or request.

The request or demand for testimony or production of documents shall set forth in, or be accompanied by, an affidavit, or if that is not feasible, in, or accompanied by, a written statement by the party seeking the testimony or records or by the party's attorney, a summary of the nature and relevance of the testimony or records sought in the legal proceedings containing sufficient information for the responsible VA official to determine whether VA personnel should be allowed to testify or records should be produced. Where the materials are considered insufficient to make the determination as described in § 14.807, the responsible VA official may ask the requester to provide additional information.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 (a) and (b); 5 U.S.C. 301)
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2089 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed 

Services Veterans Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. JEFFERSON (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BAKER, Mr. BOUSTANY, 

Mr. JINDAL, Mr. MCCRERY, and Mr. MELANCON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOUISIANA ARMED SERVICES VETERANS POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New OrleVerDate Aug 31 2005 20:30 May 02, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2089.IH H2089

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2089 IH

1 ans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louisiana Armed 

7 Services Veterans Post Office’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### § 18b.15 Exclusion from hearing for misconduct.

Disrespectful, disorderly, or contumacious language or contemptuous conduct, refusal to comply with directions, or continued use of dilatory tactics by any person at any hearing before a presiding officer shall constitute grounds for immediate exclusion of such person from the hearing by the presiding officer.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

Docket No. FAA-2015-0842; Airspace Docket No. 15-ACE-2

Amendment of Class E Airspace for the Following Missouri Towns: 
Chillicothe, MO; Cuba, MO; Farmington, MO; Lamar, MO; Mountain View, 
MO; Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in a final rule published in the 
Federal Register of October 19, 2015, by amending the magnetic bearing 
to a true bearing in the Class E surface area airspace description for 
Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 10, 2015. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Pharmakis, Central Service Center, 
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest 
Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone: 817-
222-5855.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register amending 
Class E surface area airspace at multiple airports in Missouri, 
including Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO (80 FR 63085 
October 19, 2015). Subsequent to publication the FAA identified that a 
magnetic bearing was used to describe parameters of the Class E surface 
area airspace for Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO. This 
action replaces the magnetic bearing with a true bearing.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the 
Federal Register of October 19, 2015 (80 FR 63085) FR Doc. 2015-26273, 
the bearing in the regulatory text on page 63086, column 3, line 9, is 
corrected as follows:

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

ACE MO E2 Farmington, MO (Corrected)

0
Remove ``202[deg] bearing'' and add in its place ``204[deg] bearing''

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2015.
Walter Tweedy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-28122 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
HomeMaritime Matters Status Lists...Agreement Concerning Interim Arrangements Relating to Polymetallic Nodules of the Deep Sea Bed, done at Washington September 2, 1982

# 									Agreement Concerning Interim Arrangements Relating to Polymetallic Nodules of the Deep Sea Bed, done at Washington September 2, 1982							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force September 2, 1982.

In accordance with Article 11, this Agreement shall enter into force upon signature. After entry into force of this Agreement, additional States may be invited to accede to this Agreement at any time with the consent of all Parties.
Download Status list						 [112 KB]

Tags

Maritime MattersMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top