alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of DE-PAR-09-182 R03 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 27, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marilyn Moore-Hoon, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm. 676, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4861,                         *mooremar@nidcr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22971 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 21.6010 Applicability of rules and administrative procedures under 38 U.S.C., Chapter 31. ( a ) *General.* Title 38 U.S.C., section 1524(b)(2)(A) provides, in part, that a vocational training program shall consist of vocationally oriented services and assistance of the kind provided service-disabled veterans under chapter 31, Title 38 U.S.C., and other services and assistance of the kind provided under that chapter as are necessary to enable the veteran to prepare for and participate in vocational training or employment. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2)(A))
( b ) *Applicable chapter 31 rules—general.* The rules and procedures in force for administration of the chapter 31 program (§§ 21.1-21.430) are deemed to be applicable to administration of this program in so far as their use shall not conflict with 38 U.S.C. 1524 or the rules under this subpart. Where a particular grouping of chapter 31 rules are generally applicable, without modification, the rules under this subpart will be deemed to incorporate the chapter 31 rules. The chapter 31 rules may be read as written, but terms such as *chapter 31* and *service-connected disability* shall be understood to read *chapter 15* and *disabilities* whenever used. References in the chapter 31 rules to benefits (subsistence allowances, loans) or eligibility (dependents, service-connection, serious employment handicap) are to be considered inapplicable to this program and do not confer benefits or rights not provided by 38 U.S.C. 1524.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524)
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Dora Jo Motloch, individually and on * From the 70th District

behalf of the Estate of James Motloch, Court of Ector County,

deceased, Trial Court No. A-128,142-A.

Vs. No. 11-12-00142-CV * January 16, 2014

Albuquerque Tortilla Company, Inc., * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J..

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court=s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Dora Jo Motloch, individually and on behalf of the Estate of 

James Motloch, deceased.
Exhibit 32.2

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2006 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance  Company (the  "Company") as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stanley B. Tulin,  Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Stanley B. Tulin
                                        --------------------
                                        Stanley B. Tulin
                                        Vice Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
         Date: May 12, 2006
EXHIBIT 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
  of Heritage Management, Inc.

We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference,  in this  Registration
Statement on Form SB-1 of Heritage Management, Inc. of our report dated June 30,
2003 relating to the financial statements of Heritage Management, Inc. appearing
in the Registrant's  Form SB-1 of Heritage  Management,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2002.




/s/ Malone & Bailey, PLLC
-------------------------
    Malone & Bailey, PLLC
    www.malone-bailey.com
    Houston, Texas


November 3, 2003
§ 93.523 The Administrative Law Judge's ruling. ( a ) The ALJ shall issue a ruling in writing setting forth proposed findings of fact and any conclusions of law within 60 days after the last submission by the parties in the case. If unable to meet the 60-day deadline, the ALJ must set a new deadline and promptly notify the parties, the Assistant Secretary for Health and the debarring official, if debarment or suspension is under review. The ALJ shall serve a copy of the ruling upon the parties and the Assistant Secretary for Health.
( b ) The ruling of the ALJ constitutes a recommended decision to the Assistant Secretary for Health. The Assistant Secretary for Health may review the ALJ's recommended decision and modify or reject it in whole or in part after determining it, or the part modified or rejected, to be arbitrary and capricious or clearly erroneous. The Assistant Secretary for Health shall notify the parties of an intention to review the ALJ's recommended decision within 30 days after service of the recommended decision. If that notification is not provided within the 30-day period, the ALJ's recommended decision shall become final. An ALJ decision that becomes final in that manner or a decision by the Assistant Secretary for Health modifying or rejecting the ALJ's recommended decision in whole or in part is the final HHS action, unless debarment or suspension is an administrative action recommended in the decision.
( c ) If a decision under § 93.523(b) results in a recommendation for debarment or suspension, the Assistant Secretary for Health shall serve a copy of the decision upon the debarring official and the decision shall constitute findings of fact to the debarring official in accordance with 45 CFR 76.845(c). The decision of the debarring official on debarment or suspension is the final HHS decision on those administrative actions.
Exhibit 23.1


                  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS'  REPORT

Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

We  have  reviewed  the accompanying consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Celestial  Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries  (the "Company")  as  of
June  30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income  and
cash flows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June  30,
1999 and 1998.  These financial statements are the responsibility  of
the Company's management.

We  conducted our review in accordance with standards established  by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review  of
interim   financial  information  consists  principally  of  applying
analytical  procedures to financial data and of making  inquiries  of
persons  responsible  for financial and accounting  matters.   It  is
substantially  less  in scope than an audit conducted  in  accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based  on  our review, we are not aware of any material modifications
that  should  be  made to such consolidated financial statements  for
them   to   be  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting
principles.

We  have  previously  audited, in accordance with generally  accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company  as
of  September  30, 1998, and the related consolidated  statements  of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then  ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated November 10, 1998, we
expressed  an  unqualified  opinion on those  consolidated  financial
statements.   In  our  opinion,  the information  set  forth  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,  1998  is
fairly  stated,  in  all  material  respects,  in  relation  to   the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado
July 21, 1999
HomeDSS Press Releases...Multi-Agency Operation Phoenix Arrests Nine Human Traffickers, Rescues 18 Victims

# 									Multi-Agency Operation Phoenix Arrests Nine Human Traffickers, Rescues 18 Victims							

DSS Releases

November 7, 2023

For Immediate Release – November 7, 2023

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

CaliforniaColombiaCrimeDSS ReleasesHuman TraffickingHuman Trafficking

Back to Top
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interphase Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gregory B. Kalush, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gregory B. Kalush

Gregory B. Kalush
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003
Page 1 of 2 **UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTA**  **L PROTECTION A GENCY** 

**WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460**  **OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND** 

**POLLUTION PREVENTION**

**MEMORANDUM Date**  **:** 8/24/11 **SUBJECT: Abamectin.**  **Amendment to the Human Health Risk Assessment for** 

**Proposed Uses on the Bulb Onion Subgroup 3 -**  **07A, Chives, and Dry Beans to include Cowpea in the Dry Bean Tolerance.**  **PC Code:** 122804 **DP Barcode:** D 393232 **Decision No.:** 436 528 **Registration No s**  **. :**  100
- 1351, 100
- 898, 100
- 1154 **Petition No.:** 0E7738 **Regulatory Action:** Section 3 Registration **Risk Assessment Type:** Single Chemical/Aggregate **Case No.:** None **CAS No.:** 71751
- 41
- 2 **T XR No.:**  None **40 CFR:** 180.449 **MRID No.:** None **FROM:** Nancy

Dodd, Chemist/Risk Assessor Nancy Tsaur, Chemist Whang Phang, Toxicologist Risk Assessment Branch III (RAB3) Health Effects Division (HED) (7509P) **THROUGH:** Paula Deschamp, Branch Chief

RAB3/HED (7509P) **TO:** Barbara Madden/Laura Nollen, RM#5

Registration Division (7505P)
**I. CONCLUSIONS**  HED, in consultation with the ChemSAC, has determined that the tolerance for abamectin on dry beans should be on "bean, dry , seed" as originall y proposed b y the petitioner. Cowpea does not need to be excluded from the tolerance. A label restriction should be added such as the following: "To be grown f or bean, dry

seed onl y. Do not feed or harv est c owpea forage or hay .”Page 2 of 2

**II. ACTION REQUESTED**  The Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR
- 4) proposed a tolerance for abamectin on “bean, dry , seed.” HED recommended for a tolerance on “bean, dry , seed, except cowpea” in DP#380 523 (N. Dodd, 7 /18/11 ). In review of the Federal Register Notice for the proposed use, HED’s recommended exclusion of cowpea from the tolerance was questioned. The issue was referred to the ChemSAC for review on 8/24/11. **III .**  **BACKGROUND** HED intended to exclude cowpea from the dry bean tolerance since Table I Feedstuffs (June 2008) lists cowpea forage and hay as feeds for dairy

cattle at 20% of the diet. Cowpea forage and hay are not designated as under grower control in Table I. As part of the review of the FR notice, HED was asked to reconsider exclusion of cowpea for the following reasons: 1) To harvest dry

bean, forage and hay cannot be harvested
. 2) The crop is specifically grown for hay or forage in some areas. 3) Forage varieties are distinct from dry seed variet ies since they

are developed for high dry seed yi elds. 4) If cowpea is excluded , HED should exclude others. Southern pea, blackey e pea, cowpea, and crowder are all the same crop ( Vigna unguiculata ) (Monograph 450 , Food and Feed C rops). **IV. RESULTS/DIS**  **CUSSION** HED has determined, on advice from the ChemSAC, to include cowpea in the tolerance for dry bean s . A label restriction to restrict use of cowpea forage and hay should be added.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YADIRA LIZETH FERNANDEZ; et al.
,

Petitioners,

v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 21

- 1046 Agency No s

. A209

- 399

- 941 A209

- 399

- 942

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2023 **

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges

.
Yadira Lizeth Fernandez and her son
, natives and citizens of Honduras,
petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying

their request for a continuance, their applic ation for asylum
, and Fernandez’s

applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

JUL 6 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 1046

Against Torture (“CAT”)

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

. We
review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v.

Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for

review.

Because p etitioners do not challenge the agency’s determination that they
failed to establish they suffered harm that rises to the level of persecution, we

do not address it. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th
Cir. 2013)

. Substantial evidence supports the agency ’s determination th at
petitioners failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of future

persecution in Honduras

. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.
2003) (possibility of future persecution “too speculative”). Thus, petitioners ’
asylum claim fail s

.

In this case, because Fernandez failed to establish eligibility for asylum,

s he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye , 453

F.3d at 11 90

. In light of this disposition, we do not reach petitioners’ contentions

regarding nexus. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004)
(courts are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).
We reject as unsupported by the reco rd petitioners’ contentions that the

agency ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of their claims.
Because petitioners do not contest the BIA’s determinations that they
waived challenge to the IJ’s denial of their request for a continuance an d3 21

- 1046

Fernandez’s CAT claim, we do not address them

. S ee Lopez

- Vasquez , 706 F.3d

at 1079

- 80

. The stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:58 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney; Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Elman, Barry 

Subject: Re: Biomass language in preamble and memo 

That helps because that is not the intent. We'll work on something (but probably not for the version 

that goes over later tonight) 

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:55:19 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry 

Subject: RE: Biomass language in preamble and memo 

A follow up explanation: 

We prefer to leave open the question of whether biomass is in or not. The way it was framed 

implies it is out and EPA is asking for comments on whether to let it in. 

 

Let me know if you have additional questions; I can arrange a call tomorrow to discuss. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:36 AM 

To: 'Wayland, Robertj' 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin (Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov); Elman, Barry (Elman.Barry@epa.gov) 

Subject: Biomass language in preamble and memo 

Hi all, 

One additional comment on the biomass language in the preamble. I also received comments on 

the BB1&2 memo related to biomass (also attached). 

 
On page 483 of the RSLO version of the preamble EPA included a lot of new text on biomass. We 

had a couple suggested edits: 

 

(page 483 of RLSO) “...States may include measures in their plans beyond those that the EPA 

included in its determination of the BSER. A wide range of other measures that could CO2

emission reductions. These include, for example, transmission improvements, retrofitting EGUs 

with partial CCS, the use of biomass-derived fuels, use of new NGCC units online, and new 

hydroelectric power and increments, and they are among the measures that states might consider 

for inclusion in their plans. The agency solicits comment on whether these measures are 

appropriate to include in a state plan to achieve CO2 emission reductions. We also request 

comment on other measures that would be appropriate. In addition, should the EPA provide 

specific guidance on these measures? 

We request comment, in particular, on the use of biomass-derived fuels, in place of affected EGUs, 

For example, as a measure to include in a state plan to achieve CO2 emission reductions through 

President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, the Administration is working to identify new approaches 

to protect and restore our forests, as well as other critical landscapes including grasslands and 

wetlands, in the face of a changing climate. Sustainable forestry and agriculture can improve 

resiliency to climate change, be part of a national strategy to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, 

and contribute to climate....”
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – October 4, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – October 4, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

October 4, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to France and Mexico from October 4-8, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman is on travel to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan from September 29 – October 8, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**Deputy Secretary McKeon has no public appointments.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland is on travel to France from October 3-5, 2021.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:00 p.m.** Spokesperson Ned Price holds a telephonic press briefing.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Steven Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                        |  
|----------------------- | -
|/s/ Steven Kass         | *
|                        |  
|Steven Kass             |  
|Chief Financial Officer |  

Date: May 17, 2011

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Companys offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.

---