alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 20 10 - 0 564 Directorate ID: 20 10 - SW - 1 3 -AD Helicopter Model: Arrow Falcon Exporters, Inc. (previously Utah State University); Firefly Aviation Helicopter Services (previously Erickson Air - Crane Co.); California Dep artment of Forestry; Garlick Helicopters, Inc.; Global Helicopter Technology, Inc.; Hagglund Helicopters, LLC (previously Western International Aviation, Inc.); International Helicopters, Inc.; Precision Helicopters, LLC; Robinson Air Crane, Inc.; San Joaquin Helicopters (previously Hawkins and Powers Aviation, Inc.); S.M.&T. Aircraft (previously US Helicopters, Inc., UNC Helicopter, Inc., Southern Aero Corporation, and Wilco Aviation); Smith Helicopters; Southern Helicopter, Inc.; Southwest Florida Aviatio n International, Inc. (previously Jamie R. Hill and Southwest Florida Aviation); Tamarack Helicopters, Inc. (previously Ranger Helicopter Services, Inc.); US Helicopter, Inc. (previously UNC Helicopter, Inc.); West Coast Fabrication; and Williams Helicopter Corporation (previously Scott Paper Co.) Model HH - 1K, TH - 1F, TH - 1L, UH - 1A, UH - 1B, UH - 1E, UH - 1F, UH - 1H, UH - 1L, and UH - 1P Helicopters; and Southwest Florida Aviation Model UH - 1B (SW204 and SW204HP) and UH - 1H (SW205) Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 20 T he actions will take the following approximate number of work hours per helicopter to accomplish at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour:  Create new component history cards or equivalent: 2 work hours;  Maintain records: 5 work hours per year;  24 visual inspections using a magnifying glass: 12 work hours per year;  1⁄2 of a buffer pad inspection: 1.5 hours per year;  1⁄4 of a fluorescent penetrant inspection: .5 work hour per year;  4 UT inspections: 4 work hours per year; and  Remove and replace grip set: 20 work hours per year. Required parts wil l cost approximately $37,590 per set of grips. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the AD is $828,300, if one set of grips is installed on the total affected fleet of helicopters at the end of the first year. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )
#### § 493.1487 Condition: Laboratories performing high complexity testing; testing personnel.

The laboratory has a sufficient number of individuals who meet the qualification requirements of § 493.1489 of this subpart to perform the functions specified in § 493.1495 of this subpart for the volume and complexity of testing performed.
#### § 93.223 Research misconduct proceeding.

*Research misconduct proceeding* means any actions related to alleged research misconduct taken under this part, including but not limited to, allegation assessments, inquiries, investigations, ORI oversight reviews, hearings, and administrative appeals.
41991.

#### BLEVINS v. THE STATE.

Submitted May 3, 1966

Decided May 19, 1966.

*703
      *Frank M. Gleason,*for appellant.

*Earl B. Self, Solicitor General, Bobby Lee Cook,*for appellee.

Hall, Judge.

A speedy trial is a fundamental constitutional right *(Code*§§ 2-105, 1-806, 1-815), not a privilege; it has existed in England from the time of the Magna Carta. 21 Am. Jur. 2d 278, 279, § 241; 22A CJS 20, § 467(2). “The right to a speedy trial is intended to avoid oppression and prevent delay by imposing on the courts and on the prosecution an obligation to proceed with reasonable dispatch. It has been said that the basic policy underlying the constitutional guaranty and the statutes enacted to implement it is to protect the accused from having criminal charges pending against him an undue length of time. However, the guaranty has been held to serve a threefold purpose: It protects the accused, if held in jail to await trial, against prolonged imprisonment; it relieves him of the anxiety and public suspicion attendant upon an untried accusation of crime; and, like statutes of limitation, it prevents him from being exposed to the hazard of a trial after the lapse of so great a time that the means of proving his innocence may have been lost.” 21 Am. Jur. 2d 279, § 242. “It also applies to a person who is at large on bail, since, in addition to protecting an accused against prolonged incarceration, the right also serves other purposes which are applicable whether the defendant is on bail or not.” 21 Am. Jur. 2d 280, § 244.

“The rule is that 'all causes shall be called and tried in the order in which they are docketed’ . . ; and, unless it appears to the contrary it will be presumed that the judge complied with this rule.” *Duffey v. Harris,*19 Ga. App. 646 (4) (91 SE 1007); *Code Ann.*§ 24-3343. “A different order in calling the docket *704may be pursued by the court, in its discretion, for the purpose of giving facility and expedition to its proceedings, or for furthering the ends of justice.” *Code Ann.*§ 24-3343. The defendant in this case has moved that his case be tried in order that the mandate of “a speedy trial” be enforced. The defendant having affirmatively asserted this right and the State having made no reasonable showing for a continuance *(Code Ann.*§ 27-2001), we hold that the trial court erred when it declined to grant the defendant his right to a trial upon this demand. This is particularly true since the defendant’s petition shows that he was tried under another indictment, returned the same day as the one upon which he now seeks trial, over two years ago; and it is presumed, no countershowing being made, that the prior trial took place in its regular order.

*The case is reversed and remanded with direction that ■ the defendant be tried at the next regular term of court or be discharged.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
#### § 16.121 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]               
[Page 61819]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-163]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 2, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, MacIntosh-NBAA Room and Hilton-ATA Room, Washington, DC 
20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access 
Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

November 2, 2010

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 RTCA Functional Overview
 Previous Committee History
 Current Committee Scope, Terms of Reference Overview 
(Presentation)
 Discussion of Terms of Reference for This Update
 Discussion of Scope/Areas for This Update
 Organization of Work, Assign Tasks and Workgroups
     Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations
     Assignment of Responsibilities
     Other Business
     Establish Agenda for Next Meeting
     Date and Place of Next Meeting

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-25203 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EX-10.(b)


	Exhibit 10(b) 




	CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






	We consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report, dated February 4,  2003 with respect to the financial statements of Mercury
International Value  V.I. Fund for the year ended December 31, 2002 in this Registration
Statement on  Form N-1A under the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 2-74452) and under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (File No. 811-3290) of Merrill Lynch Variable  Series
Funds, Inc.





	 	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




	MetroPark, New Jersey
November 18, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2267 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2267

 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2007

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

    (a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may award the 
Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of the Secretary of the 
Army through Headquarters, Department of the Army Letter 600-05-1, 
dated June 3, 2005) to a person who, while a member of the Army, 
participated in combat during which the person personally engaged, or 
was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period 
beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the 
date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity for the 
award of such decoration), if the Secretary determines that the person 
has not been previously recognized in an appropriate manner for such 
participation.
    (b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may make 
arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that 
eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to 
subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby 
eliminating or at least substantially reducing administrative costs for 
the Army to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### Tyler et al. v. Davis.

[No. 20,733.

Filed April 6, 1906.]

Appeal and Error. — *From Appellate to Supreme Court.*— *“Amount in Controversy.”—Fraudulent*Conveyances.—An appeal, in a suit for the setting aside of a fraudulent conveyance, does not lie from the Appellate Court to the Supreme, under subdivision 3, §1337j Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10, providing for such an appeal when “the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest on the judgment of the trial court, exceeds $6,000.”

Erom Greene Circuit Court; *Orion B. Harris,*Judge.

Suit by Annie V. Davis against Dallas Tyler and others. Erom a judgment of the Appellate Court (37 Ind. App. 557) affirming a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal under subd. 3, §1337j Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*W. R. Gardiner, C. G. Gardiner*and *T. D. Slimp,*for appellants.

*C. K. Tharp*and *Ogden & Inman,*for appellee.

Hadley, J.

—This purports to be an appeal from the Appellate Court under §1337j Burns 1901, cl. 3, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10, which gives to the losing party “the right to appeal to the Supreme Court, only when the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest on the judgment *367of the trial court, exceeds $6,000.” This action is prosecuted by the appellee to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance and have certain real estate declared subject to the payment of a judgment for appellee’s benefit previously recovered against Dallas Tyler and another.

The subject of controversy involved in this suit is not a sum of money, but the right to sell certain real property, as the property of Dallas Tyler, to pay a certain judgment previously recovered against him. It is shown as a recital in the decree that more than $8,000 of the previous judgment remained unpaid; but the former judgment is in no sense involved in this action, and can be affected in no way, except so far as it may result in the recovery of property for application to its payment. The facts bring the case squarely within the rule declared in the following cases: *Smith*v. *American, etc., Co.*(1903), 160 Ind. 141 (that part of the case appearing on page 144 having been modified in *Avery*v. *Nordyke & Marmon Co.*[1905], 164 Ind. 186, 188); *Burke*v. *Barrett*(1903), 161 Ind. 416; *Crum*v. *North Vernon Pump, etc., Co.*(1904), 163 Ind. 596; *Avery*v. *Nordyke & Marmon Co., supra.*

It follows that we have no jurisdiction of the appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48969-48970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 13, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. PCAP Managers, LLC; Parthenon Investors III, L.P.; PCAP 
Associates; J&R Advisors F.F., LLC; J&R Founders Fund II, L.P.; and 
PCAP-SNBT, LLC, all of Boston, Massachusetts; to acquire voting shares 
of Three Shores Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Seaside National Bank & Trust, both of Orlando, 
Florida.

[[Page 48970]]

    2. Lovell Minnick Holdings, LLC; Lovell Minnick Partners, LLC; 
Lovell Minnick Equity Advisors II, LLC; Lovell Minnick Equity Partners 
II, L.P.; and LM-SNBT, LLC, all of El Segundo, California; to voting 
shares of Three Shores Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Seaside National Bank & Trust, both of 
Orlando, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Harmon A. Brown, Chicago, Illinois; to become independent 
trustee of the LCK 1993 Trust; LCK Dynasty Trust; LCK Legacy Trust; the 
Katz Millennium Trust; and LCK Trust No. 2, and acquire voting shares 
of First Community Bancshares, Inc., Killeen, Texas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of FCBI Delaware Inc., Wilmington, 
Delaware, First National Bank Texas, Killeen, Texas, and Fort Hood 
National Bank, Fort Hood, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 22, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-23156 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### §§ 20.206-20.299 [Reserved]
#### § 11.127 Identification.

Before payment may be made on the adjusted service certificate, the person applying therefor will be identified as the person entitled to payment for which application is made. Such identification will be accepted if made by an authorized person as stated in § 11.114; also, fingerprint impressions shall be placed in the space provided on the application in accordance with § 11.114(a).
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 5.13 Petition for license; no corresponding application.

If no corresponding national, international design, or international application has been filed in the United States, the petition for license under § 5.12(b) must also be accompanied by a legible copy of the material upon which a license is desired. This copy will be retained as a measure of the license granted.

[80 FR 17970, Apr. 2, 2015]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
# Official Journal L 186/18 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 186 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4818 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 186

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4818 July 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission recommendation of 3 June 2005 on common guidelines for the national sides of euro circulation coins
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1648) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission recommendation of 3 June 2005 on common guidelines for the national sides of euro circulation coins
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1648)

(notified under document number C(2005) 1648)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 17.241 Sharing medical information services. ( a ) *Agreements for exchange of information.* Subject to such terms and conditions as the Under Secretary for Health shall prescribe, Directors of Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers, may enter into agreements with medical schools, Federal, State or local, public or private hospitals, research centers, and individual members of the medical profession, under which medical information and techniques will be freely exchanged and the medical information services of all parties to the agreement will be available for use by any party to the agreement under conditions specified in the agreement.
( b ) *Purpose of sharing agreements.* Agreements for the exchange of information shall be used to the maximum extent practicable to create at each Department of Veterans Affairs medical center which has entered into such an agreement, an environment of academic medicine which will help the hospital attract and retain highly trained and qualified members of the medical profession.
( c ) *Use of electronic equipment.* Recent developments in electronic equipment shall be utilized under information sharing programs to provide a close educational, scientific, and professional link between Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and major medical centers.
( d ) *Furnishing information services on a fee basis.* The educational facilities and programs established at Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers and the electronic link to medical centers shall be made available for use by medical entities in the surrounding medical community which have not entered into sharing agreements with the Department of Veterans Affairs, in order to bring about utilization of all medical information in the surrounding medical community, particularly in remote areas, and to foster and encourage the widest possible cooperation and consultation among all members of the medical profession in the surrounding medical community.
( e ) *Establishing fees for information services.* Subject to such terms and conditions as the Under Secretary for Health shall prescribe, Directors of Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers shall charge for information and educational facilities and services made available under paragraph (d) of this section. The fee may be on an annual or other periodic basis, at rates determined, after appropriate study, to be fair and equitable. The financial status of any user of such services shall be taken into consideration in establishing the amount of the fee to be paid.
[32 FR 6841, May 4, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 58250, Dec. 30, 1982. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 17072, Apr. 9, 1997]
#### § 51b.601 To which programs does this subpart apply?

The regulations in this subpart apply to the award of venereal disease control project grants for research, demonstrations, public information, and education activities which can be applied to achieve improvements in venereal disease prevention and control under section 318(b) of the Act.