alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.130 Bars to serving as a fiduciary. ( a ) An individual or entity may not serve as a fiduciary for a VA beneficiary if the individual or entity: ( 1 ) Misused or misappropriated a beneficiary's VA benefits while serving as the beneficiary's fiduciary;
( 2 ) Has been convicted of a felony offense. For purposes of this paragraph, *felony offense* means a criminal offense for which the minimum period of imprisonment is 1 year or more, regardless of the actual sentence imposed or the actual time served. However, such conviction is not a bar to serving as a fiduciary for a beneficiary if all of the following conditions are met: ( i ) The conviction occurred more than 10 years preceding the proposed date of appointment;
( ii ) The conviction did not involve any of the following offenses: ( A ) Fraud;
( B ) Theft;
( C ) Bribery;
( D ) Embezzlement;
( E ) Identity theft;
( F ) Money laundering;
( G ) Forgery;
( H ) The abuse of or neglect of another person; or
( I ) Any other financial crime;
( iii ) There is no other person or entity who is willing and qualified to serve; and
( iv ) The Hub Manager determines that the nature of the conviction is such that appointment of the individual poses no risk to the beneficiary and is in the beneficiary's interest.
( b ) An individual may not serve as a fiduciary for a VA beneficiary if the individual: ( 1 ) Refuses or neglects to provide the authorization for VA disclosure of information prescribed in § 13.100(i);
( 2 ) Is unable to manage his or her own Federal or state benefits and is in a Federal or state agency's fiduciary, representative payment, or similar program;
( 3 ) Has been adjudicated by a court with jurisdiction as being unable to manage his or her own financial affairs;
( 4 ) Is incarcerated in a Federal, state, local, or other penal institution or correctional facility, sentenced to home confinement, released from incarceration to a half-way house, or on house arrest or in custody in any facility awaiting trial on pending criminal charges;
( 5 ) Has felony charges pending;
( 6 ) Has been removed as legal guardian by a state court for misconduct;
( 7 ) Is under the age of majority; or
( 8 ) Knowingly violates or refuses to comply with the regulations in this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5502, 5506, 5507, 6101, 6106)
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 163 ) ll-E-1 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:50:59AM

Sheet 163 of 276P. 2 

## CONVERSATIO N R E 

# rnii @ 

# to TYP E Q VISI T Locatio n o

fVisit/Confereno* : 

## II-E-1 4 CONFERENC E g^TELEPHON E 

### /'/ /

• INCOMIN G •OUTGOIN G NAM E O F PERSON(S ) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC Tj ORGANIZATIO N (Office , dept. . bureau . WIT H YO U _j etc. ) UBJEC T'. ~ A 

# uAtttQ TELEPHON E NO . 

## •2? r -*/-T 7 

# £ J 

# Efto LlA—f> SUMMAR

Y 

# W K(UJ^ J £r~ ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L 

# \u_ S- MM_ £.1/^ . 

# * n 7 . IN T



# / . ^^ > fcs^/l ,„-«H / 

# 0/ WtfMf^^i ^.z'lof-beuK 

# fiteTT Ar _A)0x? > A ' f<j? - ,^_x£_lr

_,LAX ~ 0A> C\y 

# (MXjJutX. 

# ZJ &M^)*»tM n)U/ n Ch<$J) 

# ^UA 7krc0£fi • IA, 

# o t © A v ^ 

# JL . C^A^ 

# UcX &AyiJ UJ+*-U1 yr^iuA M/ , 

# 1 

# /u . fl^ /L4^M^A . 

# l**Akj

ACTIO N 

## ^ t j)fl/ L |C»UH

J 

## r ^ O F PERSO N DOCUMENTIN G CONVERSAH O 

# T^^ (WJJ&J!'.
NAM E O F PERSO N DOCUMENTIN G CONVERSATIO N ACTIO N TAK E 

# l(LW * ' <A%' 1 .t / ^ g

SIGNATUR E 

### T.TL E \V\ \

^" ^ 

## \vVv\ AA" v- xV 

## \ DAT E 50271-10 1 * GP O : 198 5 0 - .61-;- ' CONVERSATIO N RECOR D \ A OPTIONA L FOR M 27 1 (12-76 ) DEPARTMEN TO F DEFENS E 12-7 6 ENS E
§ 21.126 Farm cooperative course. ( a ) *Definition.* An approvable farm cooperative course is a full-time course designated to restore employability by training a veteran to: ( 1 ) Operate a farm which he or she owns or leases; or
( 2 ) Manage a farm as the employee of another.
( b ) *Reaching the goal of a farm cooperative course.* The farm cooperative course must enable a veteran to become proficient in the type of farming for which he or she is being provided rehabilitation services. The areas in which proficiency is to be established include: ( 1 ) Planning;
( 2 ) Producing;
( 3 ) Marketing;
( 4 ) Maintaining farm equipment;
( 5 ) Conserving farm resources;
( 6 ) Financing the farm;
( 7 ) Managing the farm; and
( 8 ) Keeping farm and home accounts.
( c ) *Instruction, including organized group instruction.* Instruction in a farm cooperative course may be by a mixture of organized group (classroom) instruction and individual instruction or by individual instruction alone. A course which includes organized group instruction must meet the following criteria to be considered as full-time: ( 1 ) The number of clock hours of instruction which should be provided yearly shall meet the requirements of § 21.310(a)(4) and § 21.4264 pertaining to full-time pursuit of a farm cooperative course:
( 2 ) The individual instructor portion of a farm cooperative course shall include at least 100 hours of individual instruction per year.
( d ) *Instruction given solely by an individual instructor.* ( 1 ) Instruction in a farm cooperative course may be given solely by an individual instructor if organized group instruction is: ( i ) Not available within reasonable commuting distance of the veteran's farm; or
( ii ) The major portion of the organized group instruction that is available does not have a direct relation to the veteran's farming operation and pertinent VA records are fully and clearly documented accordingly.
( 2 ) To be considered full-time pursuit the individual instruction provided in these course must: ( i ) Consist of at least 200 hours of instruction per year;
( ii ) Be given by a fully qualified individual instructor by contract between VA and the instructor or an educational agency which employs the instructor.
( e ) *Plan requirements for farm operator or farm manager.* ( 1 ) The plan for training developed by the case manager and the veteran in collaboration with the instructor must include: ( i ) A complete written survey including but not limited to the areas identified in § 21.298 (a) and (b);
( ii ) An overall, long-term plan based upon the survey of the operation of the farm;
( iii ) An annual plan identifying the part of the overall plan to be implemented which will be prepared before the beginning of each crop year; and
( iv ) A detailed individual training program showing the kind and amount of instruction, classroom and individual, or individual; and
( 2 ) The farm must meet the requirements for selecting a farm found in § 21.298.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104(a)(7))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984; 50 FR 9622, Mar. 11, 1985]
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      May 9, 2008




BY:
            /s/
                Colin DunnColin
                Dunn, Vice President ofFinance
exv10w6



 



Exhibit 10.6




September 2, 2003



Charles B. Cook

President and Chief Executive Officer

MSB Financial, Inc.

107 North Park Street

Marshall, Michigan 49068


Dear Mr. Cook:



     The purpose of this letter is to set forth our mutual understanding
regarding the termination of your existing employment with Marshall Savings
Bank, F.S.B. (“Marshall Savings”) and MSB Financial, Inc. (“MSB”) upon the
consummation of the merger of MSB and Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. (“MCBF”).


     Immediately prior to the closing of the merger, your employment as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Savings and MSB will
terminate. In connection with the termination of your employment, you shall
receive a lump sum payment from Marshall Savings of $454,461 on the closing
date of the merger. If your employment is involuntarily terminated prior to the
closing of the merger, or if your employment terminates as a result of your
death or disability, and at such time the merger is still pending, you or your
estate or beneficiaries will receive such payment promptly after your
employment is terminated. Except for the foregoing payment and any payments to
which you are entitled under any qualified plan sponsored by MSB or Marshall
Savings, there shall be no other benefits or remuneration payable or owing to
you as a result of the termination of your employment.


     Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the event that the payment to
be made to you under this letter agreement, together with any other payments or
benefits received or to be received by you in connection with the merger or
otherwise, would be deemed to include an “excess parachute payment” under
§ 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) as
determined by our independent auditors, then such payments shall be reduced
such that the present value of such payments is one dollar ($1.00) less than
three (3) times your “base amount” under § 280G(b)(3) of the Code. The
allocation of the reduction among all excess parachute payments shall be
determined in your discretion.


 







 


Mr. Charles B. Cook

September 2, 2003

Page 2


     By your acceptance and acknowledgment of this letter agreement, you
acknowledge and agree that, other than this letter agreement, you have no other
severance agreement, written or unwritten, with Marshall Savings or MSB or any
other written or unwritten agreement with Marshall Savings or MSB providing
similar payments or benefits.


     This letter agreement shall be binding upon MSB, Marshall Savings and
their successors and assigns and upon you and your heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, assigns and legal representatives.



	 	 	 
	 	 	
Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Karl F. Loomis


Name: Karl F. Loomis
	 	 	
Title: Director
	 	 	
MSB Financial, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Karl F. Loomis


Name: Karl F. Loomis
	 	 	
Title: Director
	 	 	
Marshall Savings Bank, F.S.B.






	 
	Accepted and Agreed:
	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Charles B. Cook

Charles B. Cook
	 
	 
	Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.
	 
	 
	 
	/s/ John R. Schroll

John R. Schroll

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 21.7112 Programs of education combining two or more types of courses. ( a ) *Concurrent enrollment.* ( 1 ) When a veteran or servicemember cannot successfully schedule his or her complete program at one educational institution, VA may approve a program of concurrent enrollment. When requesting such a program, the veteran or servicemember must show that his or her complete program of education is not available at the educational institution in which he or she will pursue the major portion of his or her program (the primary educational institution), or that it cannot be scheduled successfully within the period in which he or she plans to complete his or her program. When the standards for measurement of the courses pursued concurrently in the two educational institutions are different, the concurrent enrollment shall be measured by converting the measurement of courses being pursued at the second educational institution under the standard applicable to such institution to its equivalent measurement under the standard required for full-time courses applicable to the primary educational institution. For a complete discussion of measurement of concurrent enrollments see § 21.7172 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3688; Pub. L. 99-576)
( 2 ) The veteran or servicemember must submit the monthly certification of attendance and pursuit. Each educational institution where concurrent enrollment is approved must either endorse that certification, or submit a separate certification showing the veteran's or servicemember's enrollment and pursuit. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(b); Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Courses offered under contract.* In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30, the VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4233(e) of this part in the same manner as they are applied under 38 U.S.C. chapter 34. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a); Pub. L. 98-525)
( c ) *Television.* In determining whether a veteran or servicemember may pursue all or part of a program of education under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30 by television, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4233(c).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a))
[53 FR 1757, Jan. 22, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 28386, July 11, 1990; 62 FR 40280, July 28, 1997]
Order filed, October 14, 2015.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-15-00771-CR

LAVOSHAE WYGAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 10

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1980566

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 12, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Bonnie Rodriquez, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

/s/ Evelyn Keyes
 Acting individually
#### § 17.613 Purpose.

The purpose of §§ 17.613 through 17.618 is to establish the requirement for the Veterans Healing Veterans Medical Access and Scholarship Program (VHVMASP). The VHVMASP will provide funding for the medical education of two eligible veterans from each covered medical school.
§ 21.382 Training and staff development for personnel providing assistance under Chapter 31. ( a ) *General.* VA shall provide a program of ongoing professional training and development for staff of the Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) Service engaged in providing rehabilitation services under chapter 31. The objective of such training shall be to insure that rehabilitation services for disabled veterans are provided in accordance with the most advanced knowledge, methods, and techniques available for the rehabilitation of disabled persons. The areas in which training and development services may be provided to enhance staff skills include: ( 1 ) Evaluation and assessment:
( 2 ) Medical aspects of disability;
( 3 ) Psychological aspects of disability;
( 4 ) Counseling theory and techniques;
( 5 ) Personal and vocational adjustment;
( 6 ) Occupational information;
( 7 ) Placement processes and job development;
( 8 ) Special considerations in rehabilitation of the seriously disabled;
( 9 ) Independent living services;
( 10 ) Resources for training and rehabilitation; and
( 11 ) Utilizing research findings and professional publications. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3118)
( b ) *Training and development resources.* For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section VA may: ( 1 ) Employ the services of consultants;
( 2 ) Make grants to and contract with public and private agencies, including institutions of higher learning, to conduct workshop and training activities;
( 3 ) Authorize individual training at institutions of higher learning and other appropriate facilities; and
( 4 ) Utilize chapter 41 of title 5, U.S.C., and related instructions to provide training and staff development activities on a group and individual basis. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3118(b))
( c ) *Interagency coordination.* VA shall coordinate with the Commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration and the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment in planning and carrying out personnel training in areas of mutual programmatic concern.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3118(c))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 3, 2014

No. 04-13-00585-CR

Michael SUTTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-2137-CR

William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 18, 2014, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to 

raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief. Nichols v. 

State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 

176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). On February 27, 2014, the State filed a 

letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro se brief. 

If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so no later than April 18, 2014. 

See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a 

responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this 

court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is 

HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

We further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, 

appellant’s counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I

- 

### Pat McCrory Governor Heather McTeer Toney Regional Administrator USEPA Region
4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 September

3, 2014



### John 

### E. Skva

rl a, Ill Secretary Subject: Withdrawal
of Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) from North Carolina's 2008 Ozone Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Submittal Dear Ms. Toney: On November
2, 2012, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (DAQ) submitted

a final certification to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) demonstrating compliance with Clean Air Act Section 110(a)( 1) and (2) infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

I am writing this letter to request

a withdrawal of element (D)(i)(I) which relates to interstate transport of air pollution. North Carolina relied on the emissions reductions from EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rules (CAIR) and the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR),
as well as the state's Clean Smokestacks Act to show that emissions activities within the state will not significantly contribute
to nonattainment

or interfere with maintenance
of NAAQS in a neighboring state

. In August 2012, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated CSAPR while temporarily reinstating CAIR. In April 2014, the Supreme Court reversed that decision and remanded the CSAPR back to the D. C. Circuit. The appellate court is expected to make a decision on the CSAPR reinstatement, but its outcome and schedule
is uncertain. We are withdrawing element (D)(i)(I) to give us additional time to evaluate the court's decision, and if needed, conduct air quality modeling based on the final ruling and / or CSA emissions limits to determine if North Carolina sources are significantly contributing

to NAAQS attainment and maintenance

in downwind states. We plan to make our final submission
as expeditiously

as possible to satisfy Section 11 O(a)(l) and (2) obligations. SCH/ssm cc: Michael Abraczinskas, DAQ Sushma Masemore, DAQ Scott Davis, USEPA Lynorae Benjamin, USEPA Sincerely, 

# ~~ Sheila Holman, Director Division of Air Quality, NCDENR 1641 Mail Service Center

, Ra le igh
, North Carolina 27699-1641 Phone

: 919-707-8400

\ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov An Equa

l Opportuni

t y I A ffirma

t ive Act

i on Emp

l oyer- Made

i n pa rt by recyc

l ed paper
AirborneGeophysical Surveys

 

More information on geophysics at the USGS. 

For further technical information regarding the
#### § 93.212 Inquiry.

*Inquiry* means preliminary information-gathering and preliminary fact-finding that meets the criteria and follows the procedures of §§ 93.307-93.309.
#### § 14.516 Escheat and post fund cases.

In any case in which the Department of Veterans Affairs is entitled to possession of assets or property under the escheat provisions of 38 U.S.C. 5502(e), the gifts provisions of 38 U.S.C. ch. 83 or the General Post Fund provisions of 38 U.S.C. ch. 85, the Regional Counsel will endeavor to obtain possession of such assets or property in any manner appropriate under local procedure and practice, other than litigation. This procedure would include exploratory inquiry of the person having custody or possession of the assets or property for the purpose of determining whether the person would be willing to turn over the property to the Department of Veterans Affairs without litigation. If unsuccessful in this effort, a complete report will be submitted by the Regional Counsel to the General Counsel so that appropriate action may be taken to obtain the assistance of the Department of Justice in the matter.

[42 FR 41411, Aug. 17, 1977]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.53 Requirements for drawings filed through the TEAS.

The drawing must meet the requirements of § 2.52. In addition, in a TEAS submission, the drawing must meet the following requirements:

(a) *Standard character drawings.* If an applicant seeks registration of a standard character mark, the applicant must enter the mark in the appropriate field on the TEAS form, and check the box to claim that the mark consists of standard characters.

(b) *Special form drawings:* If an applicant is filing a special form drawing, the applicant must attach a digitized image of the mark to the TEAS submission that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.

(c) *Requirements for digitized image:* The image must be in .jpg format and scanned at no less than 300 dots per inch and no more than 350 dots per inch with a length and width of no less than 250 pixels and no more than 944 pixels. All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied.

[68 FR 55764, Sept. 26, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 38774, July 6, 2005; 73 FR 67769, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.