alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.31 Appeal to Board.

(a) *Who may appeal and how to file an appeal.* An appeal is taken to the Board by filing a notice of appeal.

(1) Every applicant, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the examiner to the Board by filing a notice of appeal accompanied by the fee set forth in § 41.20(b)(1) within the time period provided under § 1.134 of this title for reply.

(2) Every owner of a patent under *ex parte* reexamination filed under § 1.510 of this title before November 29, 1999, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the examiner to the Board by filing a notice of appeal accompanied by the fee set forth in § 41.20(b)(1) within the time period provided under § 1.134 of this title for reply.

(3) Every owner of a patent under *ex parte* reexamination filed under § 1.510 of this title on or after November 29, 1999, any of whose claims has been finally (§ 1.113 of this title) rejected, may appeal from the decision of the examiner to the Board by filing a notice of appeal accompanied by the fee set forth in § 41.20(b)(1) within the time period provided under § 1.134 of this title for reply.

(b) The signature requirements of §§ 1.33 and 11.18(a) of this title do not apply to a notice of appeal filed under this section.

(c) An appeal, when taken, is presumed to be taken from the rejection of all claims under rejection unless cancelled by an amendment filed by the applicant and entered by the Office. Questions relating to matters not affecting the merits of the invention may be required to be settled before an appeal can be considered.

(d) The time periods set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section are extendable under the provisions of § 1.136 of this title for patent applications and § 1.550(c) of this title for *ex parte* reexamination proceedings.

[69 FR 50003, Aug. 12, 2004, as amended at 76 FR 72296, Nov. 22, 2011]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1931

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EIGHT FIREARMS; ONE BALLAST WITH REFLECTOR AND

SODIUM BULB,

Defendants - Appellees,

FREDERICK JAMES DEXTER,

Party in Interest - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-94-980-2)

Submitted: July 30, 1996 Decided: August 27, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick James Dexter, Appellant Pro Se. Betty Adkins Pullin,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's judgment granting

the government's summary judgment motion and ordering the forfeiture of Appellant's property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error in the district court's denial

of relief on Appellant's Eighth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and

due process claims. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Eight Firearms, No. CA-94-980-2

(S.D.W. Va. Apr. 10, 1995). As to Appellant's claim that the forfeiture of his property violated the Double Jeopardy Clause, we

affirm. See United States v. Ursery, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565

(U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). We deny Appellant's

motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
41999.

#### DARLEY v. THE STATE. THACKER v. THE STATE.

42000.

Submitted May 3, 1966

Decided May 10, 1966.

*Joe Salem,*for appellants.

*Lewis R. Slaton, Solicitor General, J. Robert Sparks, J. Walter LeCraw,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The gist of the defendants’ demurrers is that the indictment fails to negative the many exceptions in such Act. Under decisions exemplified by *Dukes v. State,*9 Ga. App. 537 (2) (71 SE 921); *Holloway v. State,*90 Ga. App. 86 (1) (82 SE2d 235); *Rumph v. State,*119 Ga. 121, 123 (45 SE 1002); and *Elkins v. State,*13 Ga. 435, where exceptions to the operation of a penal Act are stated in the enacting clause it is necessary to negative them in an indictment or accusation, in order that the descriptions of the crime may, in all respects, correspond with the statute. In *Dukes v. State,*supra, the defendant was charged with selling or furnishing cocaine in violation of the Act of 1907 (Ga. L. 1907, p. 121), which provided that it was unlawful to sell, furnish or give *629away cocaine *except*under described circumstances, and this court held that since the indictment failed to negative the exceptions the defendant’s demurrer should have been sustained.

Section 2 of the Act of 1935 (Ga. L. 1935, pp. 418, 423; *Code Ann.*§ 42-803), under which the defendants are indicted in the present case, provides in part: “It shall be unlawful for any person to . . . possess . . . any narcotic drug except as authorized in this Act.” Thus it would seem that an indictment under the Act of 1935, supra, would require that the exceptions be negatived. However, Section 19 of such Act *(Code Ann.*§ 42-9918), provides: “In any complaint, information, or indictment, and in any action or proceeding brought for the enforcement of any provision of this Act, it shall not be necessary to negative any exception, excuse, proviso, or exemption, contained in this Act, and the burden of proof of any such exception, excuse, proviso, or exemption, shall be upon the defendant.” Under such provisions it is not necessary that the State negative the exception, and as long as such section remains a part of the Act an indictment such as that in the present case is not defective. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendants’ demurrers to the indictment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
```

[107th Congress Public Law 151]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ151.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 76]]

Public Law 107-151
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To revise certain grants for continuum of care assistance for homeless 
    individual and families. <<NOTE: Mar. 13, 2002 -  [H.R. 3699]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: Liberty Center for the Homeless 
            Incorporated. Florida.>> TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HOMELESS 
            ASSISTANCE GRANTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Notice of Funding 
Availability for Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs for 
fiscal year 2001, or any action taken in furtherance of such Notice, the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall not award a grant 
pursuant to such Notice to Liberty Center for the Homeless Incorporated 
in excess of $459,600. If an award has been made to such Center in 
excess of such amount before the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall modify the award and distribute the amounts in excess of 
$459,600 to other applicants from the Jacksonville, Florida, Continuum 
of Care in the order listed in the project priority chart contained in 
their application.

    Approved March 13, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3699:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Feb. 12, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Parkway Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Mitchell Collins,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ J. Mitchell Collins |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | J. Mitchell Collins (*) |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 4, 2008        |

 

 

 

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ParkwayProperties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 18.550 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and VA has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) VA issues any finding in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If VA fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, VA will: ( 1 ) Promptly advise the complainant of this fact; and
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Inform the complainant that: ( i ) The complainant may bring a civil action only in a United States district court for the district in which the recipient is found or transacts business;
( ii ) A complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
( iii ) Before commencing the action, the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Secretary, the Attorney General of the United States, and the recipient;
( iv ) The notice must state: The alleged violation of the Act; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and, whether or not attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) The complainant may not bring action if the same alleged violations of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6107)
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.








Date:  August 8, 2011
/s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel BernsteinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3450 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3450

 To provide for modification of the State agreement under title II of 
the Social Security Act with the State of Pennsylvania with respect to 
                           certain students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 1996

   Mr. Clinger (for himself, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fox of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Gekas, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Klink, Mr. McDade, Mr. 
 Shuster, Mr. Walker, and Mr. Mascara) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for modification of the State agreement under title II of 
the Social Security Act with the State of Pennsylvania with respect to 
                           certain students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR STUDENTS EMPLOYED BY STATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, 
              OR UNIVERSITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA.

    Notwithstanding section 218 of the Social Security Act, the 
agreement with the State of Pennsylvania (or any modification thereof) 
entered into pursuant to such section may, at the option of such State, 
be modified at any time before January 1, 1998, so as to exclude 
service performed in the employ of a school, college, or university if 
such service is performed by a student who is enrolled and is regularly 
attending classes at such school, college, or university.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION.

    Any modification of an agreement pursuant to section 1 shall be 
effective with respect to services performed after the end of the 
calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which such agreement 
is modified.

SEC. 3. IRREVOCABILITY OF MODIFICATION.

    If any modification of an agreement pursuant to section 1 
terminates coverage with respect to service performed in the employ of 
a school, college, or university, by a student who is enrolled and 
regularly attending classes at such school, college, or university, the 
Commissioner of Social Security and the State may not thereafter modify 
such agreement so as to again make the agreement applicable to such 
service performed in the employ of such school, college, or university.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.654 Patenting of inventions.

Any invention owned by the Government under the criteria as set forth in 37 CFR 501.6 should be protected by an application for a domestic patent and other necessary documents executed by the employee inventor prepared by or through the General Counsel, Deputy General Counsel or Assistant General Counsel for Professional Staff Group IV, unless some other agency has primary interest or it is decided to dedicate the invention to the public. Such dedication requires approval of the Secretary of Commerce. Applications on behalf of the Government for foreign patents may be made if determined to be in the public interest. The payment of necessary expenses in connection with any application filed or patent obtained under this section by the Department of Veterans Affairs is authorized.

[31 FR 5291, Apr. 2, 1966, as amended at 54 FR 26027, June 21, 1989; 61 FR 29658, June 12, 1996; 62 FR 14822, Mar. 28, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                      13,892,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,791,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 90,852,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           122,316,000
<PP&E>                                     305,277,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (175,958,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,770,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       98,373,000
<BONDS>                                      8,975,000
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (126,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,770,000
<SALES>                                    272,601,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                      207,484,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,394,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,402,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                321,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   145,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   176,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Focus on Phone Leasing**

----
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1
INTELLICORP, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                                  March 31,                     March 31,
(In thousands, except                             ---------                     ---------
per share amounts)                           1997           1996           1997           1996
                                             ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Primary and Fully Diluted:


Total weighted average common
      shares outstanding                      12,809        12,213         12,546         12,178
                                           =========      ========       ========       ========

Loss per share:

      Net loss                             $    (383)     $ (1,385)      $ (2,032)      $ (2,578)

      Preferred stock dividend
          requirement                            (59)           --           (148)            --
                                           ---------      --------       --------       -------- 

      Net loss available to
          common stockholders              $    (442)     $ (1,385)      $ (2,180)      $ (2,578)
                                           =========      ========       ========       ========

      Net loss per share                   $   (0.03)     $  (0.11)      $  (0.17)      $  (0.21)
                                           =========      ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>






                                       14
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000729976
<NAME>                        ENCIBAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,548
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,088
<OTHER-SE>                                    (4,636)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>