alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7221

DAVID MCKEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER WALKER; ARLINGTON COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-86)

Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David McKee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David McKee appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Walker, No.

CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). We deny McKee’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-50]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(h)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-50 with attached transmittal, and policy justification.

Dated: September 15, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 48912)          ( print page 48913)          ( print page 48914)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. E9-22942 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
§ 1.479 Disclosures to elements of the criminal justice system which have referred patients. ( a ) VA may disclose information about a patient from records covered by §§ 1.460 through 1.499 of this part to those persons within the criminal justice system which have made participation in a VA treatment program a condition of the disposition of any criminal proceedings against the patient or of the patient's parole or other release from custody if: ( 1 ) The disclosure is made only to those individuals within the criminal justice system who have a need for the information in connection with their duty to monitor the patient's progress (e.g., a prosecuting attorney who is withholding charges against the patient, a court granting pretrial or posttrial release, probation or parole officers responsible for supervision of the patient); and
( 2 ) The patient has signed a written consent as a condition of admission to the treatment program meeting the requirements of § 1.475 of this part (except paragraph (a)(8) which is inconsistent with the revocation provisions of paragraph (c) of this section) and the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Duration of consent.* The written consent must state the period during which it remains in effect. This period must be reasonable, taking into account: ( 1 ) The anticipated length of the treatment recognizing that revocation of consent may not generally be effected while treatment is ongoing;
( 2 ) The type of criminal proceeding involved, the need for the information in connection with the final disposition of that proceeding, and when the final disposition will occur; and
( 3 ) Such other factors as the facility, the patient, and the person(s) who will receive the disclosure consider pertinent.
( c ) *Revocation of consent.* The written consent must state that it is revocable upon the passage of a specified amount of time or the occurrence of a specified, ascertainable event. The time or occurrence upon which consent becomes revocable may be no earlier than the individual's completion of the treatment program and no later than the final disposition of the conditional release or other action in connection with which consent was given.
( d ) *Restrictions on redisclosure and use.* A person who receives patient information under this section may redisclose and use it only to carry out that person's official duties with regard to the patient's conditional release or other action in connection with which the consent was given, including parole.
[60 FR 63929, Dec. 13, 1995, as amended at 85 FR 64043, Oct. 9, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0479 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIEL M. ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until March 17 , 202 3 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 24 2023

02/24/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0479
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2336 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2336

 To amend title 35, United States Code, relating to the funding of the 
               United States Patent and Trademark Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2007

 Mr. Berman (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Coble, 
Mr. Boucher, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, and Mr. 
   Chabot) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 35, United States Code, relating to the funding of the 
               United States Patent and Trademark Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FUNDING.

    (a) Funding.--Section 42 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``Appropriation''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``To the extent'' and all that 
                follows through ``fees'' and inserting ``Fees''; and
                    (B) by striking ``shall be collected by and shall 
                be available to the Director'' and inserting ``shall be 
                collected by the Director and shall be available until 
                expended''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
        shall take effect on October 1, 2007.
            (2) Termination of appropriation.--The provisions of any 
        appropriation Act that make amounts available pursuant to 
        section 42(c) of title 35, United States Code, and are in 
        effect on the effective date set forth in subsection (a) shall 
        cease to be effective on that effective date.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 93.214 Institutional member.

*Institutional member* or *members* means a person who is employed by, is an agent of, or is affiliated by contract or agreement with an institution. Institutional members may include, but are not limited to, officials, tenured and untenured faculty, teaching and support staff, researchers, research coordinators, clinical technicians, postdoctoral and other fellows, students, volunteers, agents, and contractors, subcontractors, and subawardees, and their employees.
§ 20.906 Rule 906. Medical opinions and opinions of the General Counsel. ( a ) *Opinion from the Veterans Health Administration.* The Board may obtain a medical opinion from an appropriate health care professional in the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs on medical questions involved in the consideration of an appeal when, in its judgment, such medical expertise is needed for equitable disposition of an appeal. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5103A(d), 7109)
( b ) *Joint Pathology Center opinions.* The Board may refer pathologic material to the Joint Pathology Center and request an opinion based on that material. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7109(a))
( c ) *Opinion of the General Counsel.* The Board may obtain an opinion from the General Counsel of the Department of Veterans Affairs on legal questions involved in the consideration of an appeal. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7104(c))
( d ) *Independent medical expert opinions.* When, in the judgment of the Board, additional medical opinion is warranted by the medical complexity or controversy involved in an appeal, the Board may obtain an advisory medical opinion from one or more medical experts who are not employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Opinions will be secured, as requested by the Chairman of the Board, from recognized medical schools, universities, clinics, or medical institutions with which arrangements for such opinions have been made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. An appropriate official of the institution will select the individual expert, or experts, to give an opinion. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7109)
( e ) For purposes of this section, the term “the Board” includes the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, any Deputy Vice Chairman, and any Member of the Board before whom a case is pending.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5107(a), 7104(c), 7109)
[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 20453, May 7, 1996; 66 FR 38159, July 23, 2001; 69 FR 19937, Apr. 15, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 188, 190, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
Exhibit
32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 Date: May
9, 2005
****By:
    /s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel
      Bernstein, President and
      Chief
      Executive Officer
#### § 104.31 Scope.

The procedure in this subpart shall be followed if a civil action or proceeding is brought, in any court, against an employee (including the employee's estate) for personal injury, loss of property, or death, resulting from the employee's activities while acting within the scope of the employee's office or employment. When the employee is incapacitated or deceased, actions required of an employee should be performed by the employee's executor, administrator, or comparable legal representative.
From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:58 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney; Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Elman, Barry

Subject: Re: Biomass language in preamble and memo

That helps because that is not the intent. We'll work on something (but probably not for the version that goes over later tonight)

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:55:19 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry

Subject: RE: Biomass language in preamble and memo

A follow up explanation: We prefer to leave open the question of whether biomass is in or not. The way it was framed implies it is out and EPA is asking for comments on whether to let it in.

Let me know if you have additional questions; I can arrange a call tomorrow to discuss.

Regards, Cortney

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:36 AM

To: 'Wayland, Robertj'

Cc: Culligan, Kevin (Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov); Elman, Barry (Elman.Barry@epa.gov)

Subject: Biomass language in preamble and memo

Hi all,

One additional comment on the biomass language in the preamble. I also received comments on the BB1&2 memo related to biomass (also attached).On page 483 of the RSLO version of the preamble EPA included a lot of new text on biomass. We had a couple suggested edits:

(page 483 of RLSO) “...States may include measures in their plans beyond those that the EPA included in its determination of the BSER. A wide range of other measures that could CO 2 emission reductions. These include, for example, transmission improvements, retrofitting EGUs with partial CCS, the use of biomass-derived fuels, use of new NGCC units online, and new hydroelectric power and increments, and they are am ong the measures that states might consider for inclusion in their plans. The agency solicits comment on whether these measures are appropriate to include in a state plan to achieve CO 2 emission reductions. We also request comment on other measures that would be approp riate. In addition, should the EPA provide specific guidance on these measures?

We request comment, in particular, on the use of biomass-derived fuels, in place of affected EGUs, For example, as a measure to include in a state plan to achieve CO 2 emission reductions t hrough President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, the Administration is working to identify new approaches to protect and restore our forests, as well as other critical landscapes including grasslands and wetlands, in the face of a changing climate. Sustainable forestry and agriculture can improve resiliency to climate change, be part of a national strategy to reduce dependence on fossil fuels,

and contribute to climate....”
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.62 Governing body. ( a ) *Governing body.* A PACE organization must be operating under the control of an identifiable governing body (for example, a board of directors) or a designated person functioning as a governing body with full legal authority and responsibility for the following: ( 1 ) Governance and operation of the organization.
( 2 ) Development of policies consistent with the mission.
( 3 ) Management and provision of all services, including the management of contractors.
( 4 ) Establishment of personnel policies that address adequate notice of termination by employees or contractors with direct patient care responsibilities.
( 5 ) Fiscal operations.
( 6 ) Development of policies on participant health and safety, including a comprehensive, systemic operational plan to ensure the health and safety of participants.
( 7 ) A quality improvement program as described in § 460.130.
( b ) *Participant advisory committee.* ( 1 ) A PACE organization must establish a participant advisory committee to provide advice to the governing body on matters of concern to participants. Participants and representatives of participants must constitute a majority of the membership of this committee.
( 2 ) The participant advisory committee must provide the liaison to the governing body with meeting minutes that include participant issues.
( c ) *Participant representation on the governing body.* ( 1 ) A PACE organization must ensure participant representation on issues related to participant care. This shall be achieved by having a participant representative on the governing body.
( 2 ) The participant representative is a liaison of the participant advisory committee to the PACE organization governing body.
( 3 ) *Duty of the participant representative.* The participant representative must present issues from the participant advisory committee to the governing body.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 71334, Dec. 8, 2006; 84 FR 25673, June 3, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CML GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MAY 2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                       2,773,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,869,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,437,000
<INVENTORY>                                 41,010,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,320,000
<PP&E>                                      80,736,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,628,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,941,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      103,955,000
<BONDS>                                     41,593,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,281,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (58,597,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,941,000
<SALES>                                    226,831,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           226,831,000
<CGS>                                      127,839,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              127,839,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               986,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,374,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (70,955,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                31,416,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (102,371,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (102,371,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.05)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2276 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, as the ``Corporal 
            Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTOPHER E. ESCKELSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 1, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 203 North Main Street in Vassar, Michigan, as the ``Corporal 
            Christopher E. Esckelson Post Office Building''.
```
§ 21.276 Incarcerated veterans. ( a ) *General.* The provisions contained in this section describe the limitations on payment of subsistence allowance and charges for tuition and fees for: ( 1 ) Incarcerated veterans;
( 2 ) Formerly incarcerated veterans in halfway houses; and
( 3 ) Incarcerated and formerly incarcerated veterans in work release programs. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(g), 3680(a))
( b ) *Definition.* The term *incarcerated veteran* means any veteran incarcerated in a Federal, State, or local prison, jail, or other penal institution for a felony. It does not include any veteran who is pursuing a rehabilitation program under Chapter 31 while residing in a halfway house or participating in a work-release program in connection with such veteran's conviction of a felony.
( c ) *Subsistence allowance not paid to an incarcerated veteran.* A subsistence allowance may not be paid to an incarcerated veteran convicted of a felony, but VA may pay all or part of the veteran's tuition and fees. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(g))
( d ) *Halfway house.* A subsistence allowance may be paid to a veteran pursuing a rehabilitation program while residing in a halfway house as a result of a felony conviction even though all of the veteran's living expenses are paid by a non-VA Federal, State, or local government program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(a))
( e ) *Work-release program.* A subsistence allowance may be paid to a veteran in a work-release program as a result of a felony conviction.
( f ) *Services.* VA may provide other appropriate services, including but not limited to medical, reader service, and tutorial assistance necessary for the veteran to pursue his or her rehabilitation program. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(g))
( g ) *Payment of allowance at the rates paid under Chapter 30.* A veteran incarcerated for a felony conviction or a veteran in a halfway house or work-release program who elects payment at the educational assistance rate paid under Chapter 30 shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of law applicable to other incarcerated veterans training under Chapter 30. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(f), 3680(a))
( h ) *Apportionment.* Apportionment of subsistence allowance which began before October 17, 1980 made to dependents of an incarcerated veteran convicted of a felony may be continued.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3108(g))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 22807, June 23, 1986; 54 FR 4284, Jan. 30, 1989; 57 FR 57108, Dec. 3, 1992]