alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report onForm 10Q  for the Quarter ended June 30, 2003

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which thisCertification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  August 11, 2003 | /s/  SANDRA A. KNELL                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                         | **Sandra A. Knell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**                                                                                                                                                  |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                         | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. |
#### § 18b.16 Parties.

The term party shall include an applicant or recipient or other person to whom a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing has been mailed naming that person as respondent. The Department shall also be deemed a party to all proceedings and shall be represented by the General Counsel.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986; 54 FR 34984, Aug. 23, 1989]
§ 21.7803 Revision of decisions. The revision of a decision on which an action was predicated is subject to the following sections: ( a ) Clear and unmistakable error, § 3.105(a) of this chapter; and
( b ) Difference of opinion, § 3.105(b) of this chapter.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 511)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0638 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN P. MCNELLEY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 4, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 14 2023

02/14/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0638
#### § 19.1 Provisions applicable to legacy appeals.

Part 19 and subparts F, G, and J of part 20 apply only to the processing and adjudication of legacy appeals, as defined in § 19.2. Except as otherwise provided in specific sections, subparts A, B, H, K, L, M, N, and O of part 20 apply to the processing and adjudication of both appeals and legacy appeals. For applicability provisions concerning appeals in the modernized review system, see § 20.4 of this chapter.

[84 FR 177, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### § 93.202 Charge letter.

*Charge letter* means the written notice, as well as any amendments to the notice, that are sent to the respondent stating the findings of research misconduct and any HHS administrative actions. If the charge letter includes a debarment or suspension action, it may be issued jointly by the ORI and the debarring official.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.1003 Returned and canceled checks. Where the payee of a check for benefits has died prior to negotiating the check, the check shall be returned to the issuing office and canceled. ( a ) The amount represented by the returned check, or any amount recovered following improper negotiation of the check, shall be payable to the living person or persons in the order of precedence listed in § 3.1000(a)(1) through (5), except that the total amount payable shall not include any payment for the month in which the payee died (see § 3.500(g)), and payments to persons described in § 3.1000(a)(5) shall be limited to the amount necessary to reimburse such persons for the expenses of last sickness and/or burial. ( 1 ) There is no limit on the retroactive period for which payment of the amount represented by the check may be made, and no time limit for filing a claim to obtain the proceeds of the check or for furnishing evidence to perfect a claim.
( 2 ) Nothing in this section will preclude payment to an otherwise entitled claimant having a lower order of precedence under § 3.1000(a)(1) through (5), if it is shown that the person or persons having a higher order of precedence are deceased at the time the claim is adjudicated.
( b ) Subject to the limitations in § 3.500(g) of this part, any amount not paid in the manner provided in paragraph (a) of this section shall be paid to the estate of the deceased payee, provided that the estate, including the amount paid under this paragraph, will not will not revert to the state because there is no one eligible to inherit it.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not apply to checks for lump sums representing amounts withheld under § 3.551(b) or § 3.557. These amounts are subject to the provisions of §§ 3.1001 and 3.1007, as applicable.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 5122)
[59 FR 25329, May 16, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 54207, Oct. 6, 1999; 80 FR 18117, Apr. 3, 2015]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   January 12, 2005



/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  January 12, 2005



/s/ Matthew Farrell
Matthew Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Mintz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/David Mintz *
----------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2007


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
41725.

#### SCOTT v. EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA.

Argued January 6, 1966

Decided February 23, 1966

Rehearing denied March 9, 1966.

*296*Olon E. Scott,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Benjamin L. Johnson,*

*Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff alleges that the Employees’ Retirement System of Georgia refuses to recognize his eligibility for retirement benefits which he alleges he is entitled to as a result of service as an employee of the State Revenue Department, which service was terminated prior to the filing of the present action. Accordingly, whatever rights the plaintiff has under the Retirement System of Georgia Act (Ga. L. 1949, p. 138), as amended *(Code Ann. Ck.*40-25), have already accrued, and no facts are alleged which show the plaintiff is in danger of taking some future undirected action which if taken without judicial direction might reasonably jeopardize his rights.

“The petition shows that whatever rights the plaintiff has have already accrued. *State Hwy. Dept. v. Georgia, F.*&c. *R. Co.,*216 Ga. 547, 548 (117 SE2d 897), and 216 Ga. 812, 813 (120 SE2d 122). It does not show that the plaintiff is in danger of taking some future undirected action, which if taken without judicial direction might reasonably jeopardize his rights. *Rowan v. Herring,*214 Ga. 370, 373 (105 SE2d 29); *Pinkard v. Mendel,*216 Ga. 487, 490 (117 SE2d 336); *Brewton v. McLeod,*216 Ga. 686, 691 (119 SE2d 105). The Declaratory Judgments Act, *Code Ann.*§ 110-1101 et seq., makes no provision for a judgment which is merely advisory. *Shippen v. Folsom, 200*Ga. 58, 59 (35 SE2d 915); *Liner v. City of Rossville,*212 Ga. 664 (94 SE2d 862); *Henderson v. Alverson,*217 Ga. 541, 542 (123 SE2d 721).” *Bryant v. Clark Glass &c. Co.,*109 Ga. App. 606, supra.

*297Accordingly, since the plaintiff’s petition failed to set forth facts entitling him to a declaratory judgment the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendant’s general demurrer and dismissing the plaintiff’s petition must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48910-48911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economics and Statistics Administration


Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee; Notice of Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economics and Statistics 
Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 
as amended by Pub. L. 94-409, Pub. L. 96-523, Pub. L. 97-375 and Pub. 
L. 105-153), we are announcing a meeting of the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting will address ways in which the 
national economic accounts can be presented more effectively for 
current economic analysis and recent statistical developments in 
national accounting.

DATES: Friday, November 6, 2009, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and 
adjourn at 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis at 1441 L St., NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Newman, Media and Outreach 
Lead, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9265.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. Because 
of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must 
contact Jeffrey Newman of BEA at (202) 606-9265 in advance. The meeting 
is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for 
foreign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to Jeffrey Newman at (202) 606-9265.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established September 2, 
1999. The Committee advises the

[[Page 48911]]

Director of BEA on matters related to the development and improvement 
of BEA's national, regional, industry, and international economic 
accounts, especially in areas of new and rapidly growing economic 
activities arising from innovative and advancing technologies, and 
provides recommendations from the perspectives of the economics 
profession, business, and government. This will be the Committee's 
twentieth meeting.

    Dated: September 14, 2009.
Rosemary D. Marcuss,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9-23069 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announces the following meeting of the aforementioned subcommittee:

*Time and Date:*                         10 a.m.-11:30 a.m., October 15, 2009.                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference. To participate in the teleconference, please dial (866) 919-3560 enter passcode 4168828.                    

*Status:*                         Open to the public; teleconference access is limited only by availability of telephone ports. The public is welcome to participate during the public comment period which is tentatively scheduled from 11:10 a.m.-11:20 a.m.                    

*Purpose:*                         The Ethics Subcommittee will provide counsel to the ACD, CDC, regarding a broad range of public health ethics questions and issues arising from programs, scientists and practitioners.                    

*Matter To Be Discussed:*                         Ethical guidance for ventilator distribution during a severe pandemic.                    

Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Drue Barrett, PhD, Designated Federal Officer, Ethics Subcommittee, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., M/S D-50, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone (404) 639-4690.                         *E-mail: dbarrett@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: September 22, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-23300 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00824-CV

Karen D. GRIFFIN,

Appellant

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Kenneth Piper,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-08523

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Kenneth 

Piper, recover their costs of this appeal from appellant, Karen D. Griffin.

SIGNED April 16, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 623/2005

of 21 April 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified on 15 to 21 April 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of barley shall be 16,50 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
§ 1.508 Disclosure in cases where claimants are charged with or convicted of criminal offenses. ( a ) Where incompetent claimants are charged with, or convicted of, offenses other than those growing out of their relationship with the Department of Veterans Affairs and in which it is desired to disclose information from the files and records of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Regional Counsel, Under Secretary for Benefits, Veterans Benefits Administration, or the General Counsel if the General Counsel deems it necessary and proper, may disclose to the court having jurisdiction so much of the information from the files and records of the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to the mental condition of such beneficiaries, the same to be available as evidence, as may be necessary to show the mental condition of the accused and the time of its onset. This provision, however, does not alter the general procedure for handling offenses growing out of relations with the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) When desired by a U.S. district court, the Regional Counsel or the General Counsel may supply information as to whether any person charged with crime served in the military or naval service of the United States and whether the Department of Veterans Affairs has a file on such person. If the file is desired either by the court or by the prosecution or defense, it may be produced only in accord with §§ 1.501 through 1.526.
[21 FR 10375, Dec. 28, 1956, as amended at 32 FR 10848, July 25, 1967; 54 FR 34980, Aug. 23, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.2 Periods of war. This section sets forth the beginning and ending dates of each war period beginning with the Indian wars. Note that the term *period of war* in reference to pension entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1521, 1541 and 1542 means all of the war periods listed in this section except the Indian wars and the Spanish-American War. See § 3.3(a)(3) and (b)(4)(i). ( a ) *Indian wars.* January 1, 1817, through December 31, 1898, inclusive. Service must have been rendered with the United States military forces against Indian tribes or nations.
( b ) *Spanish-American War.* April 21, 1898, through July 4, 1902, inclusive. If the veteran served with the United States military forces engaged in hostilities in the Moro Province, the ending date is July 15, 1903. The Philippine Insurrection and the Boxer Rebellion are included.
( c ) *World War I.* April 6, 1917, through November 11, 1918, inclusive. If the veteran served with the United States military forces in Russia, the ending date is April 1, 1920. Service after November 11, 1918 and before July 2, 1921 is considered World War I service if the veteran served in the active military, naval, or air service after April 5, 1917 and before November 12, 1918.
( d ) *World War II.* December 7, 1941, through December 31, 1946, inclusive. If the veteran was in service on December 31, 1946, continuous service before July 26, 1947, is considered World War II service.
( e ) *Korean conflict.* June 27, 1950, through January 31, 1955, inclusive.
( f ) *Vietnam era.* The period beginning on November 1, 1955, and ending on May 7, 1975, inclusive, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. The period beginning on August 5, 1964, and ending on May 7, 1975, inclusive, in all other cases. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(29))
( g ) *Future dates.* The period beginning on the date of any future declaration of war by the Congress and ending on a date prescribed by Presidential proclamation or concurrent resolution of the Congress. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101)
( h ) *Mexican border period.* May 9, 1916, through April 5, 1917, in the case of a veteran who during such period served in Mexico, on the borders thereof, or in the waters adjacent thereto. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(30))
( i ) *Persian Gulf War.* August 2, 1990, through date to be prescribed by Presidential proclamation or law.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(33))
[26 FR 1563, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 32 FR 13223, Sept. 19, 1967; 36 FR 8445, May 6, 1971; 37 FR 6676, Apr. 1, 1972; 40 FR 27030, June 26, 1975; 44 FR 45931, Aug. 6, 1979; 56 FR 57986, Nov. 15, 1991; 62 FR 35422, July 1, 1997; 87 FR 68363, Nov. 15, 2022]