alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Perry v. The State.

*Assault mid Battery.*

(Decided May 16, 1912.

Rehearing denied May 28, 1912.

59 South. 230.)

*Appeal and Error; Judgment; Necessity.*— Where the record shows a conviction and the assessment by the jury of a. fine and a confession of judgment by accused, and his sureties, but does not show the entry of a judgment- of conviction on the verdict, the appeal cannot be sustained.

Appeal from Russell Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon, Mike Sollie.

William Perry was convicted of a,n assault and battery, and he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Glenn & de Graffenried, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the merits of thé case with citation of author*71ity, and on rehearing they insist that the matters set np therein should induce the court to grant the rehearing upon authority *of.*—Morgan *v. Jones,*48 Ala. 250.

R. C. Brickeel, Attorney General; and W.' L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

The appeal should be dismissed because no judgment was shown. — 71 Ala. 11; *Marks v. The State,*181 Ala. 44.

PELHAM, J.

The record in this case shows a conviction and a fine of $5 assessed by the jury against the defendant for an assault and battery. It also shows a confession of judgment by the defendant and his sureties, but fails to show that a judgment of conviction was entered by the court on the verdict of guilty. The appeal is not from the judgment confessed for fine and costs, and there is no judgment of guilt pronounced by fhe court on the verdict from which an appeal will lie, and, as has been so often held by the Supreme Court, the appeal must be dismissed because there is no judgment of conviction that will support an *appeal.*—Ayres *v. State,*71 Ala. 11; *Nichols v. State,*100 Ala. 23, 14 South. 539; *Wright v. State,*103 Ala. 95, 15 South. 506; *Campbell v. State,*123 Ala. 72, 26 South. 224; *Bridges v. State,*124 Ala. 44, 31 South. *18; Moss v. State,*140 Ala. 199, 37 South. 156.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 16.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
#### § 18.453 Drug and alcohol addicts.

A recipient that operates a general hospital or outpatient facility may not discriminate, with regard to a drug or alcohol abuser or alcoholic who is suffering from a medical condition, in the admission of that person for treatment of the medical condition, or in the treatment of the medical condition because of the person's drug or alcohol abuse or alcoholism.
HomeRemarks and Releases – Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540: Providing Assistance

# 									Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540: Providing Assistance							

Fact Sheet

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

 

The UN Security Council unanimously adopted resolution 1540 (UNSCR 1540) in 2004, creating a Committee to oversee efforts to assist States in their nonproliferation obligations with regard to non-state actors. In 2011, the Security Council reaffirmed the Committee’s mandate by passing Resolution 1977. UNSCR 1540 requires States to take measures to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their delivery systems, to non-state actors. While UNSCR 1540 is legally binding on all Member States, full implementation has not yet been achieved. Several States lack the capacity to implement the resolution’s requirements, and need assistance. The United States is pleased to be a partner in such assistance. Programs are in place to help countries develop their abilities to combat illicit trafficking in WMD and related materials. Others sources of assistance include national governments, organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, regional organizations such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation Europe, the Organization of American States, and non-governmental organizations.

**Procedures for Requesting Assistance**

The Committee established pursuant to resolution 1540 facilitates requests for assistance and matches States in need of assistance with those who can provide help. A list of States offering assistance and a template that States can use to submit assistance requests are available at the website of the 1540 Committee. States can also make requests via traditional diplomatic communication such as a note verbale to the Committee, or simply by letter. Serving as a clearing house, the Committee reviews requests and distributes them to organizations or States offering assistance.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of International Security and NonproliferationInternational SecurityNonproliferationUnited Nations

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32
 COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date:  May 12, 2008
    /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.William F. Farber, Sr.President and Chief Executive Officer  52




---



##### 



COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date:  May 12, 2008
    /s/ Scott A. SeasockScott A. SeasockExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer  53
# Human Trafficking

75 items

        -    Press Statement  		International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken Chairs Interagency Task Force Meeting	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken to Convene Meeting of the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Department of Justice Release  		Queens Woman Sentenced to 25 Months in Prison for Leadership Role in Visa Fraud, Identity Theft and Human Smuggling Scheme	  January 30, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Ambassador-at-Large Dyer’s Travel to Oman	  January 24, 2024 
        -    DSS Releases  		Woman and Her Two Daughters Convicted in Child Labor Trafficking Conspiracy in Chicago Suburbs	  January 23, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On National Human Trafficking Prevention Month	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 11, 2024 
        -    DSS Releases  		Former Teacher Pleads Guilty to Sexually Exploiting Children in Laos	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Fact Sheets for 2023 Trafficking in Persons Report	  December 15, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Understanding Human Trafficking	  December 12, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
§ 14.804 Factors to consider. In deciding whether to authorize the disclosure of VA records or information or the testimony of VA personnel, VA personnel responsible for making the decision should consider the following types of factors: ( a ) The need to avoid spending the time and money of the United States for private purposes and to conserve the time of VA personnel for conducting their official duties concerning servicing the Nation's veteran population;
( b ) How the testimony or production of records would assist VA in performing its statutory duties;
( c ) Whether the disclosure of the records or presentation of testimony is necessary to prevent the perpetration of fraud or other injustice in the matter in question;
( d ) Whether the demand or request is unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable court or administrative rules;
( e ) Whether the testimony or production of records, including release in camera, is appropriate or necessary under the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand or request arose, or under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege;
( f ) Whether the testimony or production of records would violate a statute, executive order, regulation or directive. (Where the production of a record or testimony as to the content of a record or about information contained in a record would violate a confidentiality statute's prohibition against disclosure, disclosure will not be made. Examples of such statutes are the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and sections 5701, 5705 and 7332 of title 38, United States Code.);
( g ) Whether the testimony or production of records, except when *in camera* and necessary to assert a claim of privilege, would reveal information properly classified pursuant to applicable statutes or Executive Orders;
( h ) Whether the testimony would interfere with ongoing law enforcement proceedings, compromise constitutional rights, compromise national security interests, hamper VA or private health care research activities, reveal sensitive patient or beneficiary information, interfere with patient care, disclose trade secrets or similarly confidential commercial or financial information or otherwise be inappropriate under the circumstances.
( i ) Whether such release or testimony reasonably could be expected to result in the appearance of VA or the Federal government favoring one litigant over another;
( j ) Whether such release or testimony reasonably could be expected to result in the appearance of VA or the Federal government endorsing or supporting a position advocated by a party to the proceeding;
( k ) The need to prevent the public's possible misconstruction of variances between personal opinions of VA personnel and VA or Federal policy.
( l ) The need to minimize VA's possible involvement in issues unrelated to its mission;
( m ) Whether the demand or request is within the authority of the party making it;
( n ) Whether the demand or request is sufficiently specific to be answered;
( o ) Other matters or concerns presented for consideration in making the decision.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 (a) and (b); 5 U.S.C. 301)
§ 424.86 Prohibition of assignment of claims by beneficiaries. ( a ) *Basic prohibition.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare does not pay amounts that are due a beneficiary under § 424.53 to any other person under assignment, power of attorney, or any other direct payment arrangement.
( b ) *Exceptions* — ( 1 ) *Payment to a government agency or entity.* Subject to the requirements of the Assignment of Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3727), Medicare may pay a government agency or entity under an assignment by a beneficiary (or by the beneficiary's legal guardian or representative payee).
( 2 ) *Payment under an assignment established by court order.* Medicare may pay under an assignment established by, or in accordance with, a court order if the assignment meets the conditions set forth in § 424.90.
#### *John D. Fanshor and P. Fitz Randolph *against*Thomas B. Stout.

ON CERTIORARI.

Bon(j tai,.en constable ant to deliver h«nselfup.(a)

(a)

 See *Ludlum vs. Wood, Pen. *56.*

OPINION of the Court.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

The plaintiff in this cause, makes his demand upon a bond in the penalty of 9 dollars cents, conditioned that if the said *John D. Fanshor,*shall deliver himself up to the said *Thomas B. Stout,*constable, &c. (on a certain day therein expressed) then the bond to be void ; and alleges that the said *Fanshor,*did not deliver himself up, &c.; stating also, that this bond was the amount of a certain execution which he had against the said *Fanshor.*

The command of these executions from the justice’s courts, is to levy the debt and costs of the goods of the defendant, if goods are to be found, and if not, to take his body, &c. Now upon neither of these can the constable take bond. If goods are found sufficient to satisfy the debt, the constable is bound to take them, if not, and the body be once in his power or custody, he cannot discharge him on such a bond. The bond is void.

Therefore judgment, I think must be reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,724
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         168,485
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,915
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     55,325
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        139,260
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,028
<DEPOSITS>                                     199,033
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,398
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,227
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,718
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 220,028
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,976
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  865
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    40
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,881
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,814
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,844
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,037
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    378
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         378
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       264
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.27
<LOANS-NON>                                        558
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    32
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,696
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       27
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,824
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,060
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            764


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

y0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140341 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140341 

 COA: 293803 

Berrien CC: 1982-002151-FY 

CHARLES STEVEN KENT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 19.37 Consideration of additional evidence received by the agency of original jurisdiction after an appeal has been initiated. ( a ) *Evidence received prior to transfer of records to Board of Veterans' Appeals.* Evidence received by the agency of original jurisdiction prior to transfer of the records to the Board of Veterans' Appeals after an appeal has been initiated (including evidence received after certification has been completed) will be referred to the appropriate rating or authorization activity for review and disposition. If the Statement of the Case and any prior Supplemental Statements of the Case were prepared before the receipt of the additional evidence, a Supplemental Statement of the Case will be furnished to the appellant and his or her representative as provided in § 19.31 of this part, unless the additional evidence received duplicates evidence previously of record which was discussed in the Statement of the Case or a prior Supplemental Statement of the Case or the additional evidence is not relevant to the issue, or issues, on appeal.
( b ) *Evidence received after transfer of records to the Board of Veterans' Appeals.* Additional evidence received by the agency of original jurisdiction after the records have been transferred to the Board of Veterans' Appeals for appellate consideration will be forwarded to the Board if it has a bearing on the appellate issue or issues. The Board will then determine what action is required with respect to the additional evidence.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not apply in proceedings before the General Counsel conducted under part 14 of this chapter to cancel accreditation or to review fee agreements and expenses for reasonableness.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5902, 5903, 5904; 38 U.S.C. 7105(d)(1) (2016))
[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 29879, May 22, 2008; 84 FR 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### Darby et al. *v.*Anderson.

[No. 20,676.

Filed May 29, 1906.

Rehearing denied December 12, 1906.]

From Clinton Circuit Court; *Samuel R. Artman,*Special Judge.

Petition by Edward L. Darby and others, against which John Anderson defends. From a judgment for defendant, petitioners appeal.

*Reversed.*

*John C. Farber, D. S. Holman*and *James V. Kent,*for appellants.

*Asa H. Boulden*and *Martin A. Morrison,*for appellee.

Monks, J.

The questions presented by the record in this cause are the same as those in *Good*v. *Burk*(1906), *ante,*462, and on the authority of that case the judgment in this case is reversed, with instructions to sustain appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal and return the papers in said cause to the board of commissioners for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.2



THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.



Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended June 30, 2004



CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The
Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly
Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2004 |  | /S/    SANDRA A. KNELL                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                       |  | Sandra A. Knell,                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                       
|                       |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.