alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:
November 6, 2009





By:
              /s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel
      Bernstein, Presidentand
      Chief Executive Officer
#### § 17.700 Purpose and scope.

This section establishes the Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas program. Under this program, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides grants to eligible entities to assist veterans in highly rural areas through innovative transportation services to travel to VA medical centers, and to otherwise assist in providing transportation services in connection with the provision of VA medical care to these veterans.

(Authority: Sec. 307, Pub. L. 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 501)
# Official Journal C 285A/23 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 285A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4723 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 285A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4723 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2004/C 285A/2 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/A/1-10/03 — Assistant administrators (A 8) | 3 |
| 2004/C 285A/3 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/C/1-10/03 — Secretaries (C5/C4) | 25 |
| 2004/C 285A/4 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/LA/11/03 — Assistant translators (LA 8) | 39 |
| 2004/C 285A/5 | Reserve lists — Open competition epso/la/10/03 — Heads of linguistic division in the translation services (career bracket LA 3) | 49 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2004/C 285A/2

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/A/1-10/03 — Assistant administrators (A 8)

3

2004/C 285A/3

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/C/1-10/03 — Secretaries (C5/C4)

25

2004/C 285A/4

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/LA/11/03 — Assistant translators (LA 8)

39

2004/C 285A/5

Reserve lists — Open competition epso/la/10/03 — Heads of linguistic division in the translation services (career bracket LA 3)

49

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
116 STAT. 76 PUBLIC LAW 107–151—MAR. 13, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3699:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Feb. 12, considered and passed House.

Feb. 25, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–151

107th Congress

An Act

To revise certain grants for continuum of care assistance for homeless individual

and families.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

GRANTS.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Notice of

Funding Availability for Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance

Programs for fiscal year 2001, or any action taken in furtherance

of such Notice, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

shall not award a grant pursuant to such Notice to Liberty Center

for the Homeless Incorporated in excess of $459,600. If an award

has been made to such Center in excess of such amount before

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall modify

the award and distribute the amounts in excess of $459,600 to

other applicants from the Jacksonville, Florida, Continuum of Care

in the order listed in the project priority chart contained in their

application.

Approved March 13, 2002.

Liberty Center

for the Homeless

Incorporated.

Florida.

Mar. 13, 2002

[H.R. 3699]
No. 03

- 14

- 00523

- CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

GEORGEINE MIKE KOROMPAY

Appellant

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE

FOR CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005

-

NC3 ASSET BACKED PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES

Appellees

Appeal f rom the County Court at Law 1 Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. C

- 1

- CV

- 14

- 003847

APPELLANT ’ S MOTION TO DISMISS

David Rogers

Texas Bar No. 24014089

Law Office of David Rogers

1201 Spyglass Suite 100

Austin, TX 78 746

Firm@DARogersLaw.com

Matthew Wilson

Texas Bar No. 24079588

Telephone: (512) 923

- 1836

Fax: (512) 201

- 4082

Fax: (512) 777

- 5988

A TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLANT ACCEPTED

03-14-00523-CV

4922396

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/16/2015 4:03:03 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKNo. 03

- 14

- 00523

- CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

GEORGEINE MIKE KOROMPAY

Appellant

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE

FOR CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005

-

NC3 ASSET BACKED PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES

Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law 1 Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. C

- 1

- CV

- 14

- 003847

APPELLANT ’ S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Comes now Appellant, Georgeine Mike Korompay , and files her motion to

dismiss her appeal from Travis County Court at Law No. 1. The part ies have

agreed to a confidential settlement and release agreement that disposes of all

claims in this matter. As such, Appellant no longer wishes to pursue this

appeal and respectfully moves this court to dismiss her appeal and remove

this case from the c ourt’s docket.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,_/s/ David Rogers

__________ DAVID ROGERS

Texas Bar No. 24014089

L AW O FFICE OF D AVID R OGERS

1201 Spyglass

Suite #100

Austin, TX 78746

Telephone: (512) 923

- 1836

Facsimile: (512) 777

- 5988

Email: Firm@DARogersLaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on April 15 , 2015 all parties finished executing a

settlement agreement, a condition of which is the filing of this motion. This

motion is therefore filed as unoppose d.

_/s/ David Rogers

__________ DAVID ROGERS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing motion was

served upon counsel of record for Appellee via t his court’s ECF system on

this 16 th day of April, 2015.

Chri s Ferguson

SBN 24069714

Jack O’Boyle & Associates

P.O.Box 815369

Dallas, TX 75381

(972) 247

- 0653

(972) 247

- 0642 [Facsimile]

Chris @jackoboyle.com

_/s/ David Rogers

__________ DAVID ROGERS
§ 21.3100 Counseling. ( a ) *Purpose of counseling.* The purpose of counseling is to assist: ( 1 ) In selecting an educational or training objective; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520)
( 2 ) In developing a suitable program of education or training; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520)
( 3 ) In selecting an educational institution or training establishment appropriate for the attainment of the educational or training objective; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3561(a))
( 4 ) In resolving any personal problems which are likely to interfere with successful pursuit of a program; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3561(a))
( 5 ) In selecting an employment objective for the eligible person that would be likely to provide the eligible person with satisfactory employment opportunities in light of his or her circumstances. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520, 3561(a))
( b ) *Availability of counseling.* Counseling assistance is available for— ( 1 ) Identifying and removing reasons for academic difficulties which may result in interruption or discontinuance of training; or
( 2 ) In considering changes in career plans, and making sound decisions about the changes. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520, 3561(a))
( c ) *Provision of counseling.* VA shall provide counseling as needed for the purposes identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section upon the request of the eligible person.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520, 3561(a))
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-522 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CLAIMS 

Settlement 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and IRAQ 

Signed at Baghdad September 2, 2010 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 IRAQ 

 Claims: Settlement 

 Agreement signed at Baghdad September 2, 2010; 

 Entered into force May 22, 2011. 

 With annex.
41522.

#### PRITCHETT v. DODD.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. “The unconditional notice by the holder of a written option to purchase land, which is supported by a valuable consideration, to the other party, that *454he has elected to purchase the property at the price and upon the terms stated in the option contract, converts the option contract into a contract of sale which is enforceable by the optionee against the optionor. The option, optionor, and optionee are metamorphosed into a contract of sale, vendor, and vendee.” *Chatham Amusement Co. v. Perry,*216 Ga. 445, 446 (2) (117 SE2d 320), and cit.

2. “An option to purchase can be exercised without the payment of the purchase price, or the tender thereof, unless the option contract provides for such payment as a condition precedent to the exercise of the option.” *Snead v. Wood,*24 Ga. App. 210 (1a) (100 SE 714). “On the sale of land, in the absence of express agreement, the payment of the purchase money and the delivery of the title deed are concurrent acts.” *Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate Exchange,*88 Ga. 321, 327 (14 SE 556).

3. Where a vendee sues to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract by the vendor by refusing to make conveyance, the general rule is that a prerequisite to a recovery therefor is a tender of the purchase money. Such tender is waived, however, by the vendor’s proclaiming, by conduct or declaration, that, if a tender should be made, acceptance would be refused. *Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate Exchange,*88 Ga. 321, 327, supra;*Smith v. Tatum,*140 Ga. 719 (2) (79 SE 775); *Fraser v. Jarrett,*153 Ga. 441, 451 (3) (112 SE 487).

4. As against general demurrer, the instant petition states a cause of action for breach of the written option contract in accordance with the foregoing principles. The only condition of the plaintiff's written notice of election to purchase was as to the date of the purchase, which was ten days after the date of the notice and this was as stipulated in the contract. The provision that the vendor was to execute the deed upon the payment of the purchase money in cash was not a condition precedent to the vendor’s obligation to perform, so as to require a tender of the purchase money by the vendee within the ten-day period, but merely contemplated payment and delivery of the deed as concurrent acts, such as is customarily done in the usual course of such transactions. The notice given by the plaintiff was sufficient to place the burden on the defendant of responding thereto and making the necessary arrangements for the sale within the ten-day period, the failure to do which resulted in a breach of the contract. The *455defendant waived a tender of the purchase money prior to the bringing of the action by giving notice of intention not to honor the contract. The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

Submitted September 8, 1965

Decided October 15, 1965.

*Thomas A. Travis, Jr., Ralph Spain,*for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jordan and Deen, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Youth Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Rifkin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May 23, 2011
/s/ Jay RifkinJay Rifkin

Principal Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1230 CAF 13-00876 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MARY L. KESSLER, PETITIONER,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCOTT M. FANCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

--------------------------------------------- SCOTT A. OTIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 5.)

SCOTT A. OTIS, WATERTOWN, APPELLANT PRO SE. MARY L. KESSLER, PETITIONER PRO SE. SCOTT M. FANCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered September 11, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order dismissed the petition for an order of protection. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Matter of Kessler v Fancher ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 27, 2013]).

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

★99–011 2002

107th Congress, 2nd Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–171

FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2002

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, THE

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

TRANSMITTING

CBO’S FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002,

PURSUANT TO 2 U.S.C. SEC. 904(b)

JANUARY 23, 2002.—Referred to the Committee on the Whole House on

the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

(1)

U.S. CONGRESS,

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE,

Washington, DC, January 15, 2002.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to section 254(b) of the Balanced

Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C.

904(b)), the Congressional Budget Office hereby submits its Final

Sequestration Report for Fiscal Year 2002 to the U.S. House of

Representatives.

Sincerely,

BARRY B. ANDERSON,

Deputy Director.

Enclosure.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,244)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,227
<PP&E>                                           3,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,465)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,589
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,473
<SALES>                                          5,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,900
<CGS>                                            2,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (110)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                      2,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,314
<PP&E>                                          13,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,032
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,280
<SALES>                                          7,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,946
<CGS>                                            3,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (175)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 20.201 Rule 201. What constitutes an appeal.

An appeal of a decision by the agency of original jurisdiction consists of a Notice of Disagreement submitted to the Board in accordance with the provisions of §§ 20.202-20.204.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105)
Exhibit 10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 
  
 PROMISSORY DEMAND NOTE 
  

	$30,000	 	September 12, 2003

  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
H.E.R.C. Products Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to S. Steven Carl (“Holder”), or order, the principal sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), together with interest on the unpaid portion
thereof from date until paid at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from September 12, 2003, on demand, as follows: 
  
 Maker shall make payment in lawful money of the United States of America. 
  
 This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part, without penalty, at the option of Maker and without the consent of Holder.

  
 This Note is nonrecourse as to Maker and is made without the
pledge of any security interest in the property, realty or personalty, of Maker. 
  
 The Maker agrees that in case of the event of default in payment of this Note, and it is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or suit is brought on the same, or same is collected through Probate or
Bankruptcy proceedings, then an additional amount of ten percent (10%) on the principal and interest of this Note shall be added to the same as collection fees. 
  

The laws of the State of Virginia excluding its conflict of laws rules shall govern this Note. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any legal action
instituted by any party to this Note shall be Norfolk, Virginia. 
  
 MAKER: 
  
 H.E.R.C. Products
Incorporated 
  
 (a Delaware Corporation) 
  

			
	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 John A. Gulick III
 Vice
President—Office of General Counsel


  
 HOLDER: 
  
 S. Steven Carl 
  

	 	


  

 18
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      May 9, 2006


By: /s/
      Colin
      Dunn


Colin
      Dunn, Vice President of Finance