alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Study Report 

Title: Porosity of Test Substance Films (Fabrics) by Scanning Electron 

 Microscopy – Summary of Data 

Report Date: October 30, 2014

File Reference: 

Principal Investigator(s): {

 

Sponsor: {

EPA Reference: TS-ZF02NT 
2

Study Report 

Porosity of Test Substance Films (Fabrics) by Scanning Electron Microscopy 

– Summary of Data 

1) Introduction: 

In connection with product research and development activities, the Sponsor has 

characterized the porosity of non-woven films of the TS-ZF02NT Test Substance formed by 

depositing aqueous suspensions of the Test Substance (“Solution”) onto a substrate using 

spin-coat techniques. This study reports on the porosity of several Test Substance films, with 

example analysis and resultant pore size distribution. 

2) Purpose & Scope: 

This study provides porosity characterization of the Test Substance after deposition onto a 

substrate as a non-woven film from a Solution by spin-coat techniques. This summary is to 

be used to inform chemical identification processes, {

} 

3) Administrative Organization: 

This report was prepared by the principal investigator, { }. The underlying 

analyses were performed at 

}.

4) Test Substance: 

The underlying measurements were conducted on films of the TS-ZF02NT new chemical 

substance (“Test Substance”), after processing into a Solution (as described in TS-ZF02NT), 

and deposition from the Solution onto a 200 mm titanium nitride-coated wafer by spin-coat 

techniques. Films of the Test Substance represent a normal end use of the Test Substance. 

5) Principle and Study Design: 

The Test Substance porosity was qualitatively determined through image processing of 

scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs using available ImageJ software. 

Collected images are processed by the ImageJ software to identify and select the void spaces. 

These are then measured in the first few layers of the nonwoven fabric. 

6) Sample Handling and Preparation: 

Non-woven Test Substance film samples are prepared in accordance with the Sponsor’s 

specification for 200 mm wafer spin coating, { } Images were collected as 

described in the sponsor’s standard operating procedure, { .}. 

7) Study Results: 

SEM micrographs like that shown in the top left of Figure 1 was examined to determine the 

size and frequency of void (holes) in deposited fabrics. Here, the voids appear as small dark 

regions that are easily distinguishable from the rest of the fabric. To count and measure these 

voids, a macro (Appendix III) was written that determined the mean grayscale pixel value as 
3

well as the standard deviation (σ). Void regions were selected by thresholding and selecting 

regions with grayscale pixel values less than 2σ (see histogram in Figure 1). Thresholded 

results are shown in the bottom SEM micrograph of Figure 1. 

 
4

 
5

* * * *
I-1 

Appendix II 

Standard Operating Procedure { } 
I-2 

} 
I-3 

 

 }
I-4 
II-1 

Appendix II: 

Standard Operating Procedure {

} 
II-2 

 } 
II-3 

4.0
II-4 
II-5
#### Benjamin Steinhardt, Appellant, *v.*John F. Burt, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment, in favor of the defendant,-rendei-ed in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan, for the second district.

Nathan Cohen, for appellant..

J. C. Julius Langbein, for respondent.

Leventritt, J.

The plaintiff seeks tq recover for moneys claimed to ,have been expended for the account .of the . defendant-. A lease, was executed between the parties whereby the' plaintiff ag landlord demised to the defendant “ the comer building known as 3683 Third avenue, in the city of New York, consisting only of the cellar, store and floor above being known as the front avenue building and does not include rear or any premises in rear of said front building.”

The lease - contains, among, others, the. following covenant: “The tenant shall pay the Croton water.rent .which shall be asr sessed on said premises when due and on his failure to pay the same shall become due on his. next month’s rent.”

. hinder this covenant the- plaintiff claims the right to hold, the defendant for the water rents of the. entire premises, including front and rear .building, while the defendant having.paid .the rents for the front building contends, that, he has discharged Ms entire .liability. The obvious -intention of .the parties as disclosed by the *783lease supports the defense. The term premises, in common parlance, is used to signify the land with its appurtenances, but its usual and appropriate meaning -in conveyances is the thing demised or granted by the deed. 19 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 4; Zinc Co. v. Franklinite Co., 13 N. J. Eq. 331. The “ said premises ” referred to in. the covenant embraced only, the front building and the defendant could- not, under the lease, be charged with the water tax imposed upon the rear building which was not demised to him.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7415

MICHAEL RANKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEONARD BONNER,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

GREGORY BONNER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-99-744-5-H)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rankins, Appellant Pro Se. Louis Phillip Hornthal, Jr.,

HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina,

for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rankins appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Rankins v. Bonner, No. CA-99-744-5-H

(E.D.N.C. July 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(Including Amendments No. 1, 2, 3 and 4)
 1. Purpose
   2. Definitions
  Award Agreement .
 Fair Market Value




---



##### 



Code
 Incentive Stock Option
 Non-Qualified Stock Option
 Restricted Stock
 Stock Appreciation Right
 Stock Award
 Stock Bonus
 3. Administration of the Plan
   2




---



##### 



4. Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan
 provided, however,
 5. Eligibility
  6. Granting of Options
  Type of Option
 Option Price
 Medium and Time of Payment
 3




---



##### 



Waiting Period
 Non-Assignability of Options
 Effect of Termination of Employment
 4




---



##### 



Leave of Absence
 Sale or Reorganization
 Restrictions on Sale of Shares.
 7. Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights
  5




---



##### 



8. Grant of Restricted Stock
  9. Grant of Stock Bonus
  10. Minimum Vesting Provisions
  6




---



##### 



11. Adjustments in the Event of Recapitalization
  12. Withholding of Applicable Taxes
  13. General Restrictions
   7




---



##### 



14. Termination and Amendment of the Plan and Stock Awards
  15. Term of the Plan
  16. Compliance with Rule 16b-3
  8




---



##### 



17. Rights as a Stockholder
  18. Options Granted to Employees and Directors of any Subsidiary in the UK
   Election
 Independent Transfer Agent
 Optionholder
 Secondary NIC
 SSCBA
 UK Option
 UK Subsidiary
  9




---



##### 



10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Morgan Keegan, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 1997, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,273
<RECEIVABLES>                                  474,116
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            371,002
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           25,768
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            498,832
<PP&E>                                          22,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,476,257
<SHORT-TERM>                                   251,300
<PAYABLES>                                     666,899
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    95,920
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              8,013
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              92,095
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,174
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,476,257
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               31,202
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            17,895
<COMMISSIONS>                                   28,452
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   15,795
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    7,854
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,498
<COMPENSATION>                                  50,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,688
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,688
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.907 Definitions. ( a ) The definitions and construction found in the Federal Claims Collection Standards in 31 CFR 900.2(a) through (d), and the definitions in the provisions on administrative wage garnishment in 31 CFR 285.11(c) shall apply to §§ 1.900 through 1.953, except as otherwise stated.
( b ) As used in §§ 1.900 through 1.953, *referral for litigation* means referral to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal actions, except in those specified instances where a case is referred to a VA Regional Counsel for legal action.
( c ) As used in §§ 1.900 through 1.953, *VA benefit program* means medical care, home loan, and benefits payment programs administered by VA under Title 38 of the United States Code, except as otherwise stated.
( d ) As used in §§ 1.900 through 1.953, *Treasury* means the United States Department of the Treasury.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501, 5316)
[69 FR 62192, Oct. 25, 2004]
§ 20.1 Rule 1. Purpose and construction of Rules of Practice. ( a ) *Purpose.* These rules establish the practices and procedures governing appeals to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board). (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 7102, 7104)
( b ) *Construction.* These rules are to be construed to secure a just and speedy decision in every appeal.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 5107, 7104)
[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 179, Jan. 18, 2019]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





October
28, 2009





By: /s/Francis V.
Dane


Chief
Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.3 Respirators for mine rescue or other emergency use in mines. ( a ) ( 1 ) NIOSH and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, shall jointly review and issue certifications for respirators used for mine emergencies and mine rescue, including any associated service-life plans, users' manuals and other supporting documentation.
( 2 ) Each certification for a respirator designed for mine rescue or other emergency use in mines shall include, as a condition of approval, any use limitations related to mine safety and health.
( b ) NIOSH and MSHA shall jointly determine appropriate recall and retrofit remedies for field complaints or identified deficiencies involving any respirators used in the mining environment.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2346 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a process for determining whether a geographic area is sufficiently served by the national 

cemeteries located in that geographic area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2007 

Mr. FOSSELLA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a 

process for determining whether a geographic area is 

sufficiently served by the national cemeteries located in 

that geographic area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

4 AFFAIRS OF WHETHER A GEOGRAPHIC AREA 

5 IS SERVED BY NATIONAL CEMETERIES LO6 CATED IN THAT AREA. 

7 (a) PROCESS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Veterans 

8 Affairs shall establish a process for determining whether 


jlentini on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2346 IH

1 a geographic area is sufficiently served by the national 

2 cemeteries located in that geographic area. Such process 

3 shall take into account each of the following: 

4 (1) The number of veterans living in the geo5 graphic area. 

6 (2) The average distance a resident of the geo7 graphic area must travel to reach the nearest na8 tional cemetery. 

9 (3) The population density of the geographic 

10 area. 

11 (4) The average amount of time it takes a resi12 dent of the geographic area to travel to the nearest 

13 national cemetery. 

14 (5) The availability of public transportation for 

15 purposes of traveling to national cemeteries located 

16 in the geographic area. 

17 (6) The average amount of any fees charged to 

18 an individual traveling on the major roads leading to 

19 the national cemeteries located in the geographic 

20 area. 

21 (b) CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES.—In the case 

22 of a geographic area in which sufficient land is not avail23 able to the Secretary for the establishment of a cemetery, 


jlentini on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2346 IH

1 the Secretary shall consider alternatives to establishing a 

2 cemetery, including establishing a mausoleum. 

Æ 


jlentini on PRODPC74 with BILLS
- GEC Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Technology Engagement Division
- Disarming Disinformation

HomeGlobal Engagement Center...Remarks and Releases – Global Engagement Center

# 						Remarks and Releases – Global Engagement Center					

55 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120202019

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenNed Price

Select a LocationArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilBulgariaCanadaCentral African RepublicChileChinaCôte d'IvoireFinlandGermanyGuatemalaJapanLatviaLibyaMaliMoldovaNew ZealandPeruRussiaSlovakiaSudanUkraineUnited KingdomXinjiang

Select a Release TypeFact SheetGlobal Engagement Center Special ReportMedia NoteOther ReleasePress StatementReport

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsGlobal Engagement CenterOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of State

          -    		Russia Must Stop Its Attacks on Food Security	  May 23, 2023 
          -    		Faces of Kremlin Propaganda: Maria Zakharova	  April 24, 2023 
          -    		Gendered Disinformation: Tactics, Themes, and Trends by Foreign Malign Actors	  March 27, 2023 
          -    		The Kremlin’s Never-Ending Attempt to Spread Disinformation about Biological Weapons	  March 14, 2023 
          -    Report  		Disinformation Roulette: The Kremlin’s Year of Lies to Justify an Unjustifiable War	  February 23, 2023 
          -    		James P. Rubin	  December 21, 2022 
          -    Press Statement  		Appointment of James P. Rubin as Special Envoy and Coordinator of the Global Engagement Center	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 16, 2022 
          -    Press Statement  		Targeting Russian Corruption in the Guatemalan Mining Sector	  Ned PriceNovember 18, 2022 
          -    Other Release  		Yevgeniy Prigozhin’s Africa-Wide Disinformation Campaign	  November 4, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Acting Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center Bray’s Trip to Germany	  October 11, 2022 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Readout of Acting CT Coordinator Godfrey’s Travel to Malta

# 									Readout of Acting CT Coordinator Godfrey’s Travel to Malta							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 12, 2021

Acting Counterterrorism Coordinator John Godfrey traveled to Valetta, Malta to co-chair the annual meeting of the Governing Board of Administrators for the International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law (IIJ) this week.  In Malta, Coordinator Godfrey also met with Christopher Cutajar, Malta’s Permanent Secretary at the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs, to discuss issues of mutual interest, including Libya and countering the financing of terrorism.

Since its founding in 2014, the IIJ has become a preeminent center for building the capacity of law enforcement and justice sector practitioners whose responsibilities include counterterrorism.  The IIJ has trained over 7,000 lawmakers, police, prosecutors, judges, corrections officials, and other justice stakeholders from over 123 countries in the last seven years.

 

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCounterterrorismMaltaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
#### § 10.22 Payment to estate of decedent.

Wherever the face value of an adjusted service certificate, issued pursuant to the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, as amended, becomes payable to the estate of any decedent and the amount thereof is not over $500 and an administrator has not been or is not to be appointed, such amount will be paid to such person or persons as would, under the laws of the State of residence of the decedent, be entitled to his personal property in case of intestacy.
#### § 18b.58 Cross-examination.

A witness may be cross-examined on any matter material to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his direct examination.
EXHIBIT  10.27



 Exhibit 10.27 
  
 STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered as of the 6th day of November, 2003 by and between Highland Hospitality Corporation, a
Maryland corporation (the “REIT”) and Libra Fund LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Investor”). 
  
 THE PARTIES ENTER THIS AGREEMENT on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions: 
  
 WHEREAS, the REIT proposes to undertake an underwritten initial public
offering (the “Offering”) of shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Shares”) pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 (the “Registration Statement”) filed pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Investor desires to purchase Shares directly from the REIT in a private transaction as set forth herein. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties
hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 
  
 1. Investor hereby agrees to purchase 830,000 Shares directly from the REIT on the terms set forth herein. The purchase price per share for the Shares purchased by Investor shall be the initial public offering price set forth in the final
prospectus for the Offering (the “Prospectus”), less an amount equal to the underwriting discount. 
  
 2. Investor understands and agrees that Investor’s purchase of the Shares hereunder is being made pursuant to a private placement exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and the Shares may not be sold, transferred or conveyed by Investor except in compliance with applicable securities laws. 
  
 3. The purchase of the Shares by Investor shall be by means of a cash payment (wire transfer or other means acceptable to
the REIT) and shall close at the time of closing of the Offering. 
  
 4. Investor hereby agrees that Investor’s purchase of the Shares may be described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus. 
  
 5. Investor hereby represents and warrants to the REIT that: 
  
 a. Investor is, and at the time of closing of the purchase of the Shares by Investor will be, a “Qualified Institutional Buyer”
as that term is defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act; and 
  
 b. Investor has received all information Investor deems relevant or necessary with respect to Investor’s purchase of the Shares. 







 6. This Agreement shall terminate if the closing of the Offering shall not have occurred on or before
March 15, 2004. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into effective as of the 6th day of November, 2003.

  

	HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
			
	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    James L. Francis        

	 	 	 	

	 	 	Name:	 	 James L. Francis

	 	 	Title:	 	 President and Chief Executive Officer



  
  

	LIBRA FUND LP
	By: Libra Associates Ltd
			
	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    Ranjan Tandon        

	 	 	 	

	 	 	Name:	 	 Ranjan Tandon

	 	 	Title:	 	 Managing Member