alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-Q for period ended March 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         105878
<SECURITIES>                                   52000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2005437
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200000
<INVENTORY>                                    2265556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4483935
<PP&E>                                         7784725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4313434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8010123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1499587
<BONDS>                                        793071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15857
<OTHER-SE>                                     2591629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5717465
<SALES>                                        8588595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8588595
<CGS>                                          4528000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4528000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2960422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               199801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             56807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1075302
<INCOME-TAX>                                   425886
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            649416
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   649416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.40
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
        32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
        and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 Dated:
        August 5, 2005
 
 
 
 
 BY: /s/
        Colin Dunn
 Colin
        Dunn, Vice President of Finance
§ 493.903 Administrative responsibilities. The proficiency testing program must— ( a ) ( 1 ) Provide HHS or its designees and participating laboratories with an electronic or a hard copy, or both, of reports of proficiency testing results and all scores for each laboratory's performance in a format as required by and approved by CMS for each CLIA-certified specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test within 60 days after the date by which the laboratory must report proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program;
( 2 ) Provide HHS with reports of PT results and scores of individual performance in cytology and provide copies of reports to participating individuals, and to all laboratories that employ the individuals, within *15* working days of the testing event; and
( 3 ) Not change submitted laboratory data and results for any proficiency testing event;
( b ) Furnish to HHS cumulative reports on an individual laboratory's performance and aggregate data on CLIA-certified laboratories for the purpose of establishing a system to make the proficiency testing program's results available, on a reasonable basis, upon request of any person, and include such explanatory information as may be appropriate to assist in the interpretation of the proficiency testing program's results;
( c ) Provide HHS with additional information and data upon request and submit such information necessary for HHS to conduct an annual evaluation to determine whether the proficiency testing program continues to meet the requirements of §§ 493.901 through 493.959;
( d ) Maintain records of laboratories' performance for a period of five years or such time as may be necessary for any legal proceedings; and
( e ) Provide HHS with an annual report and, if needed, an interim report which identifies any previously unrecognized sources of variability in kits, instruments, methods, or PT samples, which adversely affect the programs' ability to evaluate laboratory performance.
[57 FR 7151, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5228, Jan. 19, 1993; 87 FR 41233, July 11, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2242 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2242

  To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on 
                 nonresidents, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2007

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on 
                 nonresidents, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY COMMUTER TAX ON 
              NONRESIDENTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--A State may not impose a tax on the income earned 
in the State by nonresidents unless the tax is of substantial equality 
of treatment for the citizens of the State and the nonresidents so 
commuting.
    (b) State.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term ``State'' 
includes the District of Columbia and any political subdivision of a 
State.
                                 <all>
```
41688.

#### INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS et al. v. LESTER.

Submitted January 5, 1966

Decided February 23, 1966.

*Cowan, Zeigler, Downing & MoAleer, James Edward McAleer, Frank 0. Downing,*for appellants.

*Joseph B. Bergen,*for appellee.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. No exception is taken to that part of the trial court’s judgment overruling various grounds of special demurrer. Accordingly, such rulings establish the law of the case that the paragraphs so attacked were not subject to the criticism alleged in such grounds of demurrer. See *Cloud v. Stewart,*92 Ga. App. 247, 249 (88 SE2d 323), and citations.

As against general demurrer a general allegation of agency is sufficient. See *Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.,*81 Ga. App. 324 (58 SE2d 559), and citations. The petition in the *181present case alleges “that the defendant union, through its members, agents and employees, and the other defendants began picketing plaintiff’s place of employment, the aforesaid members of the defendant union have perpetrated and carried out numerous acts of violence, bombing, shooting and malicious mischief directed against plaintiff ... as a part of the defendants’ scheme and design to accomplish the aforesaid unlawful objectives.” Then followed a list of acts of violence, etc., which the plaintiff alleges were attempts to force him, by unlawful means, to coerce and intimidate him into joining the union, intimidate his family, injure his person and family and deny plaintiff the right to work at his employment because he is not a member of the defendant union.

The plaintiff’s petition set forth a cause of action and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendants’ general demurrers. See *Studdard v. Evans,*108 Ga. App. 819 (135 SE2d 60), and citations.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
- GEC Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Technology Engagement Division
- Disarming Disinformation

HomeGlobal Engagement Center...Remarks and Releases – Global Engagement Center

# 						Remarks and Releases – Global Engagement Center					

55 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120202019

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenNed Price

Select a LocationArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilBulgariaCanadaCentral African RepublicChileChinaCôte d'IvoireFinlandGermanyGuatemalaJapanLatviaLibyaMaliMoldovaNew ZealandPeruRussiaSlovakiaSudanUkraineUnited KingdomXinjiang

Select a Release TypeFact SheetGlobal Engagement Center Special ReportMedia NoteOther ReleasePress StatementReport

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsGlobal Engagement CenterOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of State

          -    		Daniel Kimmage	  February 22, 2021 
          -    		GEC Special Report: Russia’s Pillars of Disinformation and Propaganda	   
          -    		Global Engagement Center	  January 20, 2021 
          -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		Pillars of Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem [PDF]	  August 31, 2020 
          -    		Lea Gabrielle	  February 11, 2019 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-7155 September Term, 2023

1:23-cv-02592-UNA

Filed On: March 22, 2024

Dmt MacTruong, also known as Dr. Mac

Truong,

Appellant

v.

John V. Salierno, Esq., et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson, Millett, and Walker, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 11,

2023 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint on the ground

that it was frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S.

319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint . . . is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in

law or in fact.”). Appellant has not shown any error in the district court’s conclusion that

there is no private right of action under the criminal statutes he cited or under the

Uniform Code of Military Justice. See Crosby v. Catret, 308 F. App’x 453, 453 (D.C.

Cir. 2009) (stating that there is no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 241); see

also Lee v. United States Agency for Int’l Dev., 859 F.3d 74, 77-78 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

(“[T]he express provision of a criminal penalty . . . in a bare criminal statute, with no

other statutory basis for inferring that a civil cause of action exists, is insufficient to

imply Congress intended to create a concomitant civil remedy.”) (cleaned up). 

Moreover, appellant has not shown that the court erred in dismissing the complaint with

prejudice. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam)

(“A dismissal with prejudice is warranted . . . when a trial court determines that the
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-7155 September Term, 2023

allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure

the deficiency.”) (cleaned up).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6222 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JOSEPH GRASSO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(2:03-cr-00092-DCN-2; 2:05-cv-01115-DCN)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Joseph Grasso, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Joseph Grasso seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Grasso has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Morris,

429 F.3d 65, 72 (4th Cir. 2005) (holding that United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) is not retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[107th Congress Public Law 162]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ162.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 125]]

Public Law 107-162
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ``Herbert H. 
 Bateman Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Apr. 18, 2002 -  [H.R. 1749]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 685 
Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved April 18, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1749:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 147 (2001):
                                    Oct. 9, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 148 (2002):
                                    Mar. 22, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.309 Advocate in nonadjudicative proceedings.

A practitioner representing a client before a legislative body or administrative agency in a nonadjudicative proceeding shall disclose that the appearance is in a representative capacity and shall conform to the provisions of §§ 11.303(a) through (c), 11.304(a) through (c), and 11.305.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of R34 Clinical Trial Pilot Applications PAR-08-195 and R01 PA-07-070 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 30, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca Wagenaar Miller, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy, Rm 666, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0652,                         *rwagenaa@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22969 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2011 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2007 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 

4 AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

6 States courthouse located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine 

7 Bluff, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States 

9 Courthouse’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 2011 RCS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building and United States court4 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

5 a reference to the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

6 and United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS