alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.182 “Applicant” status. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purposes of *applicant* status are to: ( 1 ) Process a veteran's claim for assistance under Chapter 31 in a timely manner; and
( 2 ) Identify service-disabled veterans whom VA should contact individually to increase their awareness and understanding of how they may benefit from services furnished under Chapter 31. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3102)
( b ) *Assignment to applicant* status. VA will assign a veteran's records to *applicant* status when either: ( 1 ) VA receives a formal or informal application from a veteran for services under Chapter 31; or
( 2 ) The Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) Division: ( i ) Advises a veteran in writing of the veteran's potential eligibility for Chapter 31 services, or
( ii ) Is informed that the veteran has been advised in writing of his or her potential eligibility for Chapter 31 services by other VA elements. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3102(2))
( c ) *Termination of applicant* status. *Applicant* status will be terminated when: ( 1 ) An appointment for an initial evaluation has been kept by the veteran; or
( 2 ) The veteran's service-connected disability is reduced to a noncompensable degree; or
( 3 ) The veteran's service-connected disability is severed; or
( 4 ) The veteran's application is invalid because of fraud or error; or
( 5 ) The veteran withdraws his or her claim, or otherwise indicates that no further assistance is desired. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)
( d ) *Transfer of terminated cases to discontinued* status. Each instance in which a veteran's case is terminated for reasons described in paragraph (c)(4) or (5) of this section shall be placed in *discontinued* status. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3102)


Cross Reference:
See §§ 21.30 Claims, 21.31 Informal claims, and 21.32 Time limits. [49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 2518, Jan. 23, 1987; 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
42049.

#### FLEMING v. THE STATE.

Submitted June 8, 1966

Decided June 22, 1966.

*Lewis ■& Javetz, Emanuel Lewis,*for appellant.

Deen, Judge.

1. When this ease was here before *(Fleming v. State,*113 Ga. App. 113 (147 SE2d 480)) this court held that the defendant’s right to be present when sentence is imposed includes all material portions thereof, and that an attack on a sentence because not imposed on the defendant in his presence was good cause for setting the sentence aside. In accordance with this court’s direction, after the remittitur was received by the trial court, sentence was again imposed, this time in his presence, and the defendant now contends that the provision thereof that it shall be served consecutively to another sentence previously imposed is void because at the time of the original sentencing the judge did not include such provision in his oral pronouncement made in the defendant’s presence. “Oral declarations of the judge constitute no part of the sentence until they have been put in writing and duly entered as such. *Freeman v. Brown,*115 Ga. 23 (41 SE 385); *Alexander v. Chipstead,*152 Ga. 851 (111 SE 552); *Foy v. McCrary,*157 Ga. 461 (121 SE 804); *Conley v. Pope,*161 Ga. 462 (131 SE 168); *Morgan v. Mount,*195 Ga. 281 (24 SE2d 17).” *Long v. Stanley,*200 Ga. 239, 241 (36 SE2d 785). Indubitably, the original sentence having been set aside at the defendant’s instance, and the new sentence being in accordance with law, he can neither complain that he has been sentenced anew nor can he rely upon .oral declarations of the trial court made prior to the signing of the original sentence by the court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
#### § 18b.94 Matters not prohibited.

A request for information which merely inquires about the status of a proceeding without discussing issues or expressing points of view is not deemed an ex parte communication. Such requests should be directed to the civil rights hearing clerk. Communications with respect to minor procedural matters or inquiries or emergency requests for extensions of time are not deemed ex parte communications prohibited by § 18b.92. Where feasible, however, such communications should be by letter with copies to all parties. Ex parte communications between a respondent and the responsible agency official or the Secretary with respect to securing such respondent's voluntary compliance with any requirement of part 18 of this chapter are not prohibited.
#### § 20.504 Rule 504. Extension of time for filing a Substantive Appeal in simultaneously contested claims.

An extension of the 30-day period to file a Substantive Appeal in simultaneously contested claims may be granted if good cause is shown. In granting an extension, consideration will be given to the interests of the other parties involved. A request for such an extension must be in writing and must be made prior to expiration of the time limit for filing the Substantive Appeal.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105A(b) (2016))

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 183, Jan. 18, 2019]
§ 21.7722 Courses and enrollments which may not be approved. ( a ) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not approve an enrollment by a reservist in, and a State approving agency may not approve for training under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 (or 10 U.S.C. chapter 106 as in effect before December 1, 1994): ( 1 ) A bartending or personality development course;
( 2 ) A course offered by radio;
( 3 ) Except for enrollments in a nurse's aide course approved pursuant to § 21.4253(a)(5), an institutional course for the objective of nurse's aide or a nonaccredited nursing course which does not meet the licensing requirements in the State where the course is offered; or
( 4 ) Effective October 29, 1992, a nonaccredited course or unit subject offered entirely or partly by independent study. However, see §§ 21.7620(c) and 21.7622(f) concerning payment of educational assistance to reservists enrolled in such a course. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16131(c)(1), 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3452)
( b ) A State approving agency (or VA when acting as a State approving agency) may approve the following courses for training under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 (or 10 U.S.C. chapter 106 as in effect before December 1, 1994), but VA may not approve an enrollment in any of these courses by a reservist who is limited in the types of courses he or she may pursue, as provided in § 21.7540 (b)(2) and (b)(3): ( 1 ) A correspondence course;
( 2 ) A cooperative course;
( 3 ) An apprenticeship or other on-job training program;
( 4 ) A nursing course offered by an autonomous school of nursing;
( 5 ) A medical or dental specialty course not offered by an institution of higher learning;
( 6 ) A refresher, remedial, or deficiency course; or
( 7 ) A course or combination of courses consisting solely of independent study.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2131(c), 2136(b), 16131(c)(1), 16136(b); 38 U.S.C. 3670 through 3676; sec. 705(a)(1), Pub. L. 98-525, 98 Stat. 2565, 2567; sec. 642, Pub. L. 101-189, 103 Stat. 1456-1458)
[61 FR 29310, June 10, 1996]
Last Updated:  22 July 1996National Domestic Violence Hotline:  1-800-799-SAFETDD for the Hearing Impaired:  1-800-787-3224What is a Safety Plan?Every individual in an abusive relationship needs a safety plan.  The District of ColumbiaCoalition Against Domestic Violence has published wallet-sized card that gives names andphone numbers of shelters, legal services, and support groups, and lists basic elements of a safetyplan. (The number is listed in the back.)  Shelters and crisis counselors have been urging safetyplans for years, police departments, victim services, hospitals, and courts have adopted thisstrategy.  Safety plans should be individualized -- for example, taking account of age, maritalstatus, whether children are involved, geographic location, and resources available -- but stillcontain common elements.
When creating a safety plan: 
- Think about all possible escape routes .  Doors, first-floor windows, basement exits,elevators, stairwells.  Rehearse if possible. Choose a place to go.
 To the home of a friend or relative who will offerunconditional support, or a motel, or hotel, or a shelter -- most importantly somewhere you willfeel safe.
Pack a survival kit. Money for cab fare, a change of clothes, extra house and carkeys, birth certificates, passports, medications, and copies of prescriptions, insuranceinformation, checkbook credit cards, legal documents such as separation agreements andprotection orders, address books, and valuable jewelry, and papers that show jointly ownedassets.  Conceal it in the home or leave it with a trusted neighbor, friend, or relative.  Importantpapers can also be left in a bank deposit box.
Try to start an individual savings account.
 Have statements sent to a trusted relativeor friend.
Avoid arguments with the abuser in areas with potential weapons.
 Kitchen, garage,or in small spaces without an outside door.
Know the telephone number of the domestic violence hotline. Contact it forinformation on resources and legal rights.
Review the safety plan monthly.
 Adapted from: "Preventing Domestic Violence" by Laura Crites in PreventionCommunique, March 1992, Crime Prevention Division, Department of the AttorneyGeneral, Hawaii.
Return to the Violence Against Women Home Page
#### § 18.461 Procedures.

The procedural provisions applicable to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to this part. These procedures are found in §§ 18.6 through 18.11 and part 18b of this chapter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7780

JOHN A. ONWUKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNKNOWNS, (names not readily available),

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:11-cv-01398-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Onwuka, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John A. Onwuka appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Onwuka v. Unknowns, No. 1:11-cv-01398-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. 

filed Sept. 13, 2012; entered Sept. 14, 2012). We further deny 

Onwuka’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7415

MICHAEL RANKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEONARD BONNER, Defendant - Appellee, and GREGORY BONNER, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-744-5-H) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Rankins, Appellant Pro Se. Louis Phillip Hornthal, Jr., HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael Rankins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rankins v. Bonner , No. CA-99-744-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 14.806 Scope of testimony or production.

VA personnel shall not, in response to a request or demand for testimony or production of records in legal proceedings, comment or testify or produce records without the prior written approval of the responsible VA official designated in § 14.807(b). VA personnel may only testify concerning or comment upon official VA information, subjects or activities, or produce records, that were specified in writing, submitted to and properly approved by the responsible VA official.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 (a) and (b); 5 U.S.C. 301)
§ 233.3 Temporary limitations on proceedings. ( a ) *Moratorium on new claims.* If the Board has determined that the number of pending cases before it has overwhelmed the capacity of the Board, the Board may impose a temporary stay on the filing of claims. The Board shall publish an announcement of that determination on its website, stating the effective date of the stay, and the duration of the stay, not to exceed six months.
( b ) *Exception to moratorium.* If a claimant's statute of limitations under 17 U.S.C. 1504(b) is about to expire during the stay issued under paragraph (a) of this section, the claimant may file a claim on or before the statutory deadline accompanied by a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that the statute of limitations will expire during the stay and setting forth facts in support of that conclusion. If the Board determines that the statute of limitations likely will expire during the stay based on the facts set forth in the declaration, the Board shall hold the claim in abeyance and conduct a compliance review following the end of the stay.
Order entered October 4 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00021 - CR LUIS JOSE HERRERA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F - 1230982 - W



### O RDER Before the Court is State’s September 24, 2019, motion for second extension of time to file brief , as well as the State’s October 3, 2019 letter clarifying the motion . W e GRANT this motion and ORDER the State’s brief, received on September 24, 2019, filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave. 

### NORTH DAKOTA Bismarck, NO 58501-1947 DEPARTMENT

### of HEALTH 701.328.5200 (fax) www.ndhealth.gov

March 8, 2012

Mr. Carl Daly (8P-AR) Chief, Air Programs U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Re: Section 128 Commitment DearMr. Daly: This letter is written to provide a commitment by the North Dakota Department ofHealth to comply with the requirements of Section 128 of the Clean Air Act. The Department will incorporate the following requirements ofthe North Dakota Department ofHealth's Ethics Policy in the State Implementation Plan for the Control ofAir Pollution: 

### Conflicts ofInterest A conflict of interest is 

### definedas the conflict between the duties assignedto the employee andthe self-interest or other interests ofthe employee. Employees must avoid any interest, influence or relationship that might conflictor appear to conflict with the best interests of the Department of Health or the State of North Dakota, or that might affect one's workingjudgment or loyalty. Employees must avoid any situation in which their loyalty may be divided andpromptly disclose to their division director any situation where an actual or potentialconflictmay exist. 

### Ifemployees have a potential conflict ofinterest in any program, contract or legal matter involving the Department of Health or reasonably relatedto theirposition with the Department of Health, the employees must notifY the division director, section chiefor supervisor in writing ofthe potential conflict and the cause ofthe potential conflict and remove themselves from any negotiations, deliberations or decisions involving the conflict. The SIP revision will be applicable to anyone who approves permits or enforcement actions under North Dakota's Implementation ofthe Federal Clean Air Act. We believe these requirements 

### fultl11 the stipulations ofSection 128 ofthe Federal Clean Air Act. The SIP revision will be submitted by May 31, 2013. Ifyou have any questions, please contactme.

# r---:~7~ Terry L. O'Clair, P.E. Director Division ofAir Quality TLO/TB:saj xc: Margaret Olson, Ass't. Attorney General

Environmental Health Division of Division of Division of Division of Section Chief's Office Air Quality Municipal Facilities Waste Management Water Quality 701.328.5150 701.328.5188 701.328.5211 701.328.5166 701.328.5210 Printedon recycledpaper.
#### § 2.1 General provisions.

In addition to the delegations of authority in this part, numerous delegations of authority are set forth throughout this title.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512)

[64 FR 47111, Aug. 30, 1999]
#### § 63.5 How will NIH make awards?

Subject to the regulations of this part, the Director may award traineeships to those qualified applicants who are best able in that official's judgment to carry out the purpose of the traineeships. These awards may be made for a period of one (1) year or other period, including extensions or renewals, as may be specified.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:  May
11, 2009





BY:
              /s/ Colin DunnColin
      Dunn, Vice President ofFinance
#### § 1.520 Confidentiality of social data.

Persons having access to social data will be conscious of the fact that the family, acquaintances, and even the veteran have been willing to reveal these data only on the promise that they will be held in complete confidence. There will be avoided direct, ill-considered references which may jeopardize the personal safety of these individuals and the relationship existing among them, the patient, and the social worker, or may destroy their mutual confidence and influence, rendering it impossible to secure further cooperation from these individuals and agencies. Physicians in talking with beneficiaries will not quote these data directly but will regard them as indicating possible directions toward which they may wish to guide the patient's self-revelations without reproaching the patient for his or her behavior or arousing natural curiosity or suspicion regarding any informant's statement. The representatives of service organizations and duly authorized representatives of veterans will be especially cautioned as to their grave responsibility in this connection.

[46 FR 62059, Dec. 22, 1981]
• ~f&Lb-~ .. · ~am; ~ut7(_fi~h5 _ __;______:...._.__ _____ -------''-------------

~:B-'d.~·-t4--· ___ · ---~------------;--

~_/!i._._k_osf&_l~---------------­

. · . · · · . I. Wt\.S wft,JII'!J_torJUAJ'Aj-lb-y-lllQfLo~-~1) . 

. . c_c:;w±t!.X.ll-'.Ct_~tJij;{IJ_y_t/&7,:£_/biHfc:d_£<><.J-.d/zcLC:AJ<;/_oj__. ----'---

-~C. .. ~-ycu-oku~-Lt-l.e<!.ieu:d-~6y~+-hG~-I/,_o/_~ .. -· . __ _ 

IJ-yw~h-flrl)2;-Cai<J-y/:V-(JI~~/d2b~lleJ~5~kJ-t<k.J~'f-()_U_~u4 ·._ 

· .J.iJJ.:LcJ> ... l_~,!e_,l_,£jJJ:Jy~·~lbtJ-.J~ ~ . yru'l-llt2J2. · . · .. 

--RECI:IVElliN------,--------,--------

_.cruJp: m C '!li.~INALAPPEALS 

___ JAtLL4_2Q15__,_· .· ._· -~-----------~-'----

Abel. Acosta, Clerk 

••• _). 

' . .. -~·-"-·-- •---- ---;------ --~ ----------r--=----· __ ....__ __ ··-----•--;-•-· •- ··-------,....-- -------------··-------~~--------·-·--·- -· •
#### § 11.100 Form of note.

The form of note used in making loans secured by adjusted service certificates shall follow Form 1185.
#### § 21.7570 Entitlement.

Except as provided in § 21.7576(e) each reservist is entitled to a maximum of 36 months of educational assistance (or its equivalent in part-time educational assistance) under this program, but is also subject to the provisions of § 21.4020 (a) and (b).

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16131(c); Pub. L. 98-525, Pub. L. 102-127) (Oct. 10, 1991)

[58 FR 51783, Oct. 5, 1993]
#### § 20.707 Rule 707. Prehearing conference.

An appellant's authorized representative may request a prehearing conference with the presiding Member of a hearing to clarify the issues to be considered at a hearing on appeal, obtain rulings on the admissibility of evidence, develop stipulations of fact, establish the length of argument which will be permitted, or take other steps which will make the hearing itself more efficient and productive.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7107)

[84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6117

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES SIMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00248-GRA-13)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

James Sims appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Sims , No. 7:02-cr00248-GRA-13 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009). * We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We consider Sims’ notice of appeal to have been timely filed. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
```

[House Hearing, 107 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
  GENETIC NONDISCRIMINATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

              SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

                                 OF THE

                       COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND
                             THE WORKFORCE

                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                      ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                               __________

             HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, JULY 24, 2001

                               __________

                           Serial No. 107-25
                               __________

  Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce

                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
77-674                          WASHINGTON : 2002
_____________________________________________________________________________
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov  Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512-1800  
Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001

```