alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41713.

#### LESTER v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS et al.

Pannell, Judge.

1. The trial judge had the right to construe his order of September 16th due to the ambiguity in the language therein, and since the same ambiguity appears in the ruling on the special demurrers, this language in reference to the special demurrers should be given the same construction as that given by the trial judge to the similar language on the general demurrers; thus construing the language, it appears that the special demurrers were not passed on.

2. There being no statute in this State, nor any rule of court presented, which requires that demurrers to a petition which *397has been amended be renewed within any particular period of time, it does not appear that the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss the demurrers on the sole ground that they were not renewed to the petition within the time required by law. Whether the special demurrers should have been dismissed because they were filed too late is not a question presented for decision.

Argued January 4, 1966

Decided March 16, 1966

Rehearing denied March 30, 1966.

*Joseph B. Bergen, Converse Bright,*for appellant.

*James Edward McAleer, Frank 0. Downing,*for appellees.

3. “The simplest test of the sufficiency of a petition against general demurrer is whether the defendant can admit all that is alleged and still escape liability. *Ga. R. & Banking Co. v. Rayford,*115 Ga. 937 (42 SE 234); *Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Martin,*92 Ga. 161 (18 SE 364).” *Harvey v. Zell,*87 Ga. App. 280, 284 (73 SE2d 605); *Hartridge v. Savannah News-Press,*107 Ga. App. 274, 276 (129 SE2d 536). The petition, as amended, although somewhat general in its allegations relating to agency, sufficiently alleged a cause of action against the defendant. See, in this connection, *Gilmer v. Allen,*9 Ga. 208 (4); *Lewis v. Amorous,*3 Ga. App. 50, 53 (59 SE 338); *Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.,*81 Ga. App. 324, 327 (58 SE2d 559); *Chatham v. Texaco, Inc.,*109 Ga. App. 419 (136 SE2d 489). It follows, therefore, that the trial court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
§ 23.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 23.450.
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 27, 2020 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2020-2 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2023, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of May, 2023.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
41868.

#### STRICKLAND v. WAYNE COUNTY et al.

Argued March 8, 1966

Decided April 5, 1966

Rehearing denied April 19, 1966.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “The Act of 1960 (Ga. L. 1960, p. 289) enacting a New Insurance Code, provides (p. 673, New Code Section *56-2437—Code Ann.*§ 56-2437) that a county may obtain insurance to cover liability on account of bodily injury arising out of the ownership, maintenance, operation, or use of any motor vehicle under its management, control or supervision, whether engaged in any governmental undertaking or not, and prohibits the county from pleading governmental immunity as a defense, and provides that the securing of such insurance is a waiver of such immunity to the extent of the insurance so purchased. It follows that where the county purchases such insurance governmental immunity is lost accordingly.” *Hall County v. Loggins,*110 Ga. App. 432 (138 SE2d 699).

2. The negligent loading of a truck is negligence arising from the operation of such vehicle. *Allen v. Reed,*93 Ga. App. 215, 218 (91 SE2d 308).

3. Where, as in this case, plaintiff’s. petition alleges the purchase of such a liability insurance policy as contemplated and described in *Code Ann.*§ 56-2437, supra, and alleges further bodily injury as the result of the negligence of defendant county’s servants in the operation and use of its motor vehicles a cause of action, as against a general demurrer, is set out and the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s plea of immunity and general demurrer.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*

*500*Albert E. Butler,*for appellant.

*Luhr G. C. Beckmann, Hitch, Miller, Beckmann & Simpson, Zorn ■& Boyal, J. Kenneth Boyal, Gibbs & Leaphart, J. Alvin Leaphart,*for appellees.
§ 21.5133 Certifications and release of payments. A veteran or servicemember must be pursuing a program of education in order to receive payment of educational assistance allowance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 32. To ensure that this is the case, the provisions of this section must be met when a veteran or servicemember is seeking such payment. ( a ) *General.* VA will pay educational assistance to a veteran or servicemember (other than one pursuing a program of apprenticeship, other on-job training, or a correspondence course; one seeking reimbursement for taking an approved licensing or certification test; or one who qualifies for an advance payment) only after: ( 1 ) The educational institution has certified his or her enrollment as provided in § 21.5200(d) of this part; and
( 2 ) VA has received from the individual a verification of the enrollment. Generally, this verification will be required monthly, resulting in monthly payments.
( b ) *Apprenticeship and other on-job training.* VA will pay educational assistance to a veteran pursuing a program of apprenticeship or other on-job training only after— ( 1 ) The training establishment has certified his or her enrollment in the training program as provided in § 21.5200(d); and
( 2 ) VA has received from the training establishment a certification of hours worked. Generally, this certification will be required monthly, resulting in monthly payments.
( c ) *Correspondence training.* VA will pay educational assistance to a veteran or servicemember who is pursuing a correspondence course or the correspondence portion of a combined correspondence-residence course only after— ( 1 ) The educational institution has certified his or her enrollment;
( 2 ) VA has received from the veteran or servicemember a certification as to the number of lessons completed and serviced by the educational institution; and
( 3 ) VA has received from the educational institution a certification or an endorsement on the veteran's or servicemember's certificate, as to the number of lessons completed by the veteran or servicemember and serviced by the educational institution. Generally, this certification will be required quarterly, resulting in quarterly payments.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 2900-0178 and 2900-0465) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3680(c), 3680(g), 3689)
[57 FR 38612, Aug. 26, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 16978, Apr. 5, 2007; 85 FR 59191, Sept. 21, 2020]
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Lawrence R. Yurdin, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Lawrence R. YurdinName: Lawrence R. Yurdin
Title: Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 6, 2003
#### § 21.7114 Change of program.

In determining whether a veteran or servicemember may change his or her program of education under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4234 of this part. VA will not consider programs of education a veteran or servicemember may have pursued under 38 U.S.C. ch. 34 or 36 before January 1, 1990, if he or she wishes to change programs of education under 38 U.S.C. ch. 30.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3691; Pub. L. 98-525, Pub. L. 101-366) (June 1, 1991)

[57 FR 29027, June 30, 1992]
#### STATE of Arkansas *v.*Jack BLAND

CR 76-88

542 S.W. 2d 497

Opinion delivered October 25, 1976 (In Banc)

[Rehearing denied November 22, 1976.]

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., *by. Jack T. Lassiter,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

*Gordon, Gordon & Eddy,*by: *Allen Gordon,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The State seeks to take an appeal from an interlocutory order entered on February 19, 1976, following an Omnibus Hearing held pursuant to Ark. Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 20.3. The notice of appeal was filed the same date. After obtaining two extensions in the trial court for obtaining a transcript, the attorney general filed the record in this Court on May 20, 1976, Rule 36.10(c), of the Ark. Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires appeals by the state to be filed in this Court within 60 days after the filing of the notice. Since the present appeal was not filed within the 60 day period, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeHuman Trafficking

# Human Trafficking

77 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Unifying Trauma-Informed Practices and Voices of Survivor Leadership	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Understanding Human Trafficking	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The Role of the Financial Sector: Promising Practices in the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Navigating the Unique Complexities in Familial Trafficking	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Forced Labor in China’s Xinjiang Region	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Child-Friendly Spaces for Survivors of Human Trafficking	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Acknowledging Historical and Ongoing Harm: The Connections Between Systemic Racism and Human Trafficking	  July 1, 2021 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Release of the 2021 Trafficking in Persons Report	  Kari JohnstoneJuly 1, 2021Thursday, July 1, 2021: 4:00 p.m. EDTWashington, D.C.  
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Acting Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs Julie Chung and Special Envoy for the Northern Triangle Ricardo Zuniga	  Julie J. ChungJune 4, 2021 
        -    		Report on Human Trafficking in Fishing in International Waters	   

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top
Source Date:

September 2013

Air Quality Planning Branch, AQPSD

Area Designations for National

Ambient Air Quality Standards

PMIO

0 50 100

MOUNTAIN

COUNTIES

150 200

Sacramento

Mono

Basin

Lake GREAT

BASIN

VALLEYS

SAN

BAY

Santa

COAST

COAST

SOUTH

I______ Unclassified

_____ Attainment

______ Nonattainment SAN

Air Basin

County
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.404 Respect for rights of third persons.

(a) In representing a client, a practitioner shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.

(b) A practitioner who receives a document or electronically stored information relating to the representation of the practitioner's client and knows or reasonably should know that the document or electronically stored information was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender.
**8820 EAST PINE STREET**  **TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74158 -**  **2833 PHONE: 1**  **- 918**  **- 836**  **- 6886**   **TOLL FREE: 1 -**  **800 -**  **331 -**  **1204** August 18 , 2014 Dear Sir or Madam , The Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology in Tulsa Oklahoma, Air Agency Certificate Number DF2S766K, is seeking an exemption from FAR 61.138 specific to its training of foreign air carrier contract students. These students are already employed by foreign air carriers and will not be serving as flight officers for a US Domestic Carrier. Further, our interest in this matter is solely for the authorization to take the Airline Transport Pilot Knowledge Test. No applicant will be testing for an Airline T ransport Pilot Certificate as part of their course or training with Spartan. As a control measur e for the proposed exemption, Spartan would agree to: 1) The Testing center Administrator will stamp the original test result with a red ink stamp that reads “Not Valid for the FAA ATP Flight Test”. 2) A copy of the test results will be provided to the app licant with the original being maintained with the students records for inspections as required by the FAA. 3) A written notification of each applicant taking the Airlines Transport Pilot Knowledge Test under this exemption would be made to the FAA’s Airman Records Division. We would be happy to discuss any additional requirements that may be necessary to ensure that this proposed exemption works for all parties and that the ATP Knowledge Test Results could not be used for the ATP Practical Flight Test. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Best Regards, Ryan

**Ryan Goertzen** President Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology 8820 E. Pine St. Tulsa, OK 74158

- 2833 Office: (+1)918.831.5227 Cell: (+1)918.576.9981 ryan.goertzen@spartan.edu
#### § 21.5231 Combination.

In the administration of benefits payable under chapter 32, title 38, U.S.C., the Department of Veterans Affairs will apply § 21.4233(b), (c), and (e).

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241)

[45 FR 31, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 7218, Feb. 27, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (491)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             244
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (204)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                         474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,648
<SALES>                                            384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   384
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       54
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    171
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        15
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   May 6, 2005

/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 6, 2005

/s/ Matthew T. Farrell
Matthew T. Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                             AMARIN CORPORATION PLC
                             2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         WHEREAS, Amarin Corporation plc, an English company (the "Company") has
established and maintains the Amarin Corporation plc 2002 Stock Option Plan,
effective as of January 1, 2002 (the "Plan"), which authorizes the grant of
stock options to certain employees and non-employees of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company has reserved 2,000,000 outstanding ordinary shares
("Shares") for issuance under the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Plan reserves to the Board of Directors of
the Company the right to amend the Plan at any time; and

         WHEREAS, the Company's stockholders have approved by majority vote on
July 25, 2003 to further increase the number of Shares available for grant under
the Plan by an additional 2,000,000 Shares for an aggregate of 4,000,000 Shares;
and

         WHEREAS, the Plan has stated as one of its purposes the ability to
award "incentive stock options" that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), and Section 422 of the Code requires
such an increase in Shares available for issuance to be approved by the
Company's stockholders.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section
4.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of July 25, 2003, to read as
follows:

         "Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the
         Plan may issue up to 4 million Shares under all Awards (the "Plan
         Limit")."

                                      * * *

         IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be
executed by its duly authorized officer this 21st day of November, 2003.


                                 AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

                                 By: Jonathan Lamb
                                     ---------------------------------------

                                 Name: /s/ Jonathan Lamb
                                       -------------------------------------

                                 Its: General Counsel and Company Secretary
                                      --------------------------------------