alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6116** 

DAVID YOUNG O’SHIELDS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEWIS SMITH , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00483

- WO

- JLW )

Submitted : Ju ne 26 , 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING , and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. David Young O’Shields, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Young O’Sh ields seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of app ealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pr isoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 32 2, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that O’Shields has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
U.S. Department of Energy



## ,,'Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

EEFE Home

Appliances: Home About Standards Laws & Regulations Information Resources Notices & Rules Priority Setting 2006 S chedule Setting Public Workshops & Hearings State Petitions Useful Links Commercial Products ASHR.AE Products Clothes Washers Distribution Transformers Electric Motors Furnaces & Boilers High Intensity Discharge Lamps Refrigeration Equipment Small Electric Motors Unitary Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps Water Heaters Residential Products Search Help 7 More Sea,ch Options a SERE information Center 

## Commercial Clothes Washers The Department held an informal public meeting on April 27, 2006, to discuss and receive comments on issues to be addressed in the Framework Document for establishing energy conservation standards for residential electric and gas ranges and ovens and microwave ovens, dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and commercial clothes washers. The Department is also initiating the data collection. Written comments on these subjects are encouraged and should be received by May 11, 2006. 

### For information related to the April 27, 2006, meeting, visit the Home Appliances Public Meeting webpage. Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs.

Framework Document Rulemaking Framework for Commercial Clothes Washers and Residential Dishwashers, idifiers, and Cooking Products, March 15, 2006 (PDF402KB = 

## Energy Conservation Standard Rulemaking e Notice of public workshop and availability of F^^ra^^,,ework Document, Federal Register, March 27, 2006 (PDF 70 I(-^2^ 

### Contact Information Bryan Berringer Project Manager (202)586-0371

Printable Version
Webmaster I Security & Privacy I Building Technologies Program Home I EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated : 04/28/2006

# Summary of Comments on http://www.eere.energy. gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commer Page: 1 Number : 1 Author: DOE Subject: Note Date: 9/4/2007 4:47:19 PM See comment number 01.1 Number : 2 Author: DOE Subject: Note Date : 9/4/2007 4:47:32 PM See comment number 01.2
41883.

#### BENEFIELD v. HARRIETT & HENDERSON COTTON MILLS, INC. et al.

Argued April 4, 1966

Decided April 29, 1966.

*Howe & Murphy, Harold L. Murphy,*for appellant.

*Pittman & Kinney, L. Hugh Kemp,*for appellee.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. (a) A claim for compensation for an injury as defined in *Code*§ 114-102 must be filed within one year from the date of the .accident causing the injury. *Code*§ 114-305.

(b) Where the accident causing the alleged injury occurred January 28, 1963, and the employee’s claim for compensation was received and filed by the board January 28, 1964, it was not timely filed.

2. A finding by the board that the accident upon which the employee predicated his claim occurred January 28, 1963,. is conr clusive when supported by any evidence.

.3. An “occupational disease” is not compensable unless it is one included in *Code*§ 114-803.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                               Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Terry (for himself, Mr. Fortenberry, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                               Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Nebraska.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will 
reflect the change in the number of judgeships authorized by subsection 
(a), such table is amended by striking the item relating to Nebraska 
and inserting the following:

``Nebraska.................................................         4''.
 

                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00774

- CV

In re David N. Cotton

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__ _

____________________ ___________________ Darlene Byrne

, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Trian a and Smith

Filed: December 29 , 2022
§ 210.23 Designation of the mechanical licensing collective and digital licensee coordinator. The following entities are designated pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 115(d)(3)(B) and (d)(5)(B). Additional information regarding these entities is available on the Copyright Office's website. ( a ) Mechanical Licensing Collective, incorporated in Delaware on March 5, 2019, is designated as the mechanical licensing collective; and
( b ) Digital Licensee Coordinator, Inc., incorporated in Delaware on March 20, 2019, is designated as the digital licensee coordinator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CELESTIAL SEASONINGS, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13042
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (659)
<INVENTORY>                                      17282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32678
<PP&E>                                           33398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   74763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9281
<BONDS>                                           7390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                       58009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     74763
<SALES>                                          89975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 89975
<CGS>                                            32367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    32367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 46777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10272
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6420
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       4,649,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      78,897,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      33,113,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        33,521,000
<LOANS>                                     54,365,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                    924,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,213,000
<DEPOSITS>                                  86,591,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                   367,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            207,000
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,595,000
<COMMON>                                     7,314,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             101,213,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,653,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,334,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               123,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,050,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,102,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,311,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,739,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   86,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,329,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,047,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   699,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .059
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,172,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    93,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,127,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  431,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   142,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              923,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           923,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 18.436 Procedural safeguards. ( a ) A recipient that operates a public elementary or secondary education program shall implement a system of procedural safeguards with respect to actions regarding the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of persons who, because of handicap, need or are believed to need special instruction or related services. The system shall include: ( 1 ) Notice;
( 2 ) An opportunity for the parents or guardian of the person to examine relevant records;
( 3 ) An impartial hearing with opportunity for participation by the person's parents or guardian and representation by counsel; and
( 4 ) Review procedure.
( b ) Compliance with the procedural safeguards of section 615 of the Education of the Handicapped Act is one means of meeting this requirement.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...New Sanctions Targeting Iran’s UAV and Ballistic Missile Industries

# 									New Sanctions Targeting Iran’s UAV and Ballistic Missile Industries							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

January 6, 2023

The United States has designated seven individuals in leadership positions with Qods Aviation Industries (QAI), an Iranian defense manufacturer responsible for the design and production of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and of Iran’s Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO), the main organization responsible for overseeing Iran’s ballistic missile programs.

Today’s action is pursuant to E.O. 13382 and follows our designations in September and November of individuals and entities involved in the production and transfer of Iranian Shahed~~–~~ and Mohajer- series UAVs, which Moscow continues to use in its brutal attacks against Ukraine, including its critical infrastructure.

The Iranian regime’s military support to Russia not only fuels the conflict in Ukraine but has also resulted in violations of UN Security Council resolution 2231 through its provision of military UAVs without advance, case-by-case approval of the UN Security Council.  Iran has now become Russia’s top military backer.  Iran must cease its support for Russia’s unprovoked war of aggression in Ukraine, and we will continue to use every tool at our disposal to disrupt and delay these transfers and impose costs on actors engaged in this activity.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

 

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsDefenseIranOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaThe Secretary of StateUkraineWeapons

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.78

                                                                   Perry A. Sook
                                                                   President/CEO

TO: Brian Jones

FR: Perry A. Sook

RE: Addendum to Employment Agreement

DA: 8/28/03

Reference is hereby made to your Executive Employment Agreement with Nexstar
Broadcasting Group, Inc. This memorandum will serve as an addendum.

Paragraph 6 (b)(i), Termination Payments. The period is hereby extended to one
year.

Please indicate your agreement with and acceptance of the terms and conditions
of this addendum as of the date written by signing below.

Sincerely,                               Agreed and Accepted;

/s/ Perry A. Sook                       /s/ Brian Jones
    Perry A. Sook                           Brian Jones
    President/CEO                           Senior Vice President



                        Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc.
            909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Suite 1450, Irving, TX 75039,
                       (972) 373-8800 fax (972) 373-8888
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM TOFUTTI
BRANDS  INC.'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED JULY 1, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>




<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                     1,547,000
<SECURITIES>                                 259,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,556,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 241,000
<INVENTORY>                                  957,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,632,000
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4,773,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        967,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      64,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,742,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4,773,000
<SALES>                                    6,872,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6,872,000
<CGS>                                      4,292,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,292,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,681,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (31,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              930,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 368,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          562,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 562,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .07



</TABLE>
§ 1.303 Policy. ( a ) *General.* Parking spaces at VA medical facilities shall only be provided under the following conditions: ( 1 ) VA and its employees shall not be liable for any damages to vehicles (or their contents) parked in VA parking facilities, unless such damages are directly caused by such employees acting in the course of their VA employment.
( 2 ) Parking facilities at VA medical facilities shall only be made available at each medical facility for such periods and under such terms as prescribed by the facility director, consistent with §§ 1.300 through 1.303.
( 3 ) VA will limit parking facilities at VA medical facilities to the minimum necessary, and administer those parking facilities in full compliance with ridesharing regulations and Federal laws.
( b ) *Fees.* ( 1 ) As provided in § 1.302, VA will assess VA employees, contractor employees, tenant employees, visitors, and other individuals having business at a VA medical facility where VA parking facilities are available, a parking fee for the use of that parking facility. All parking fees shall be set at a rate which shall be equivalent to one-half of the appropriate fair rental value (*i.e.*, monthly, weekly, daily, hourly) for the use of equivalent commercial space in the vicinity of the medical facility, subject to the terms and conditions stated in paragraph (a) of this section. Fair rental value shall include an allowance for the costs of management of the parking facilities. The Secretary will determine the fair market rental value through use of generally accepted appraisal techniques. If the appraisal establishes that there is no comparable commercial rate because of the absence of commercial parking facilities within a two-mile radius of the medical facility, then the rate established shall be not less than the lowest rate charged for parking at the VA medical facility with the lowest established parking fees. Rates established shall be reviewed biannually by the Secretary to reflect any increase or decrease in value as determined by appraisal updating.
( 2 ) No parking fees shall be established or collected for parking facilities used by or for vehicles of the following: ( i ) Volunteer workers in connection with such workers performing services for the benefit of veterans receiving care at the medical facility;
( ii ) A veteran or an eligible person in connection with such veteran or eligible person receiving examination or treatment;
( iii ) An individual transporting a veteran or eligible person seeking examination or treatment; and
( iv ) Federal Government employees using Government owned or leased or private vehicles for official business.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8109)
[53 FR 25490, July 7, 1988]
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.6
 Compensatory Arrangements for Executive Officers
  Name and Position
    
    
    2007 Base Salary
    
    
    2006 BonusColin Goddard, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer(1)
    
    
    $
    600,000
    
    
    
    
    Michael G. Atieh
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
    
    
    $
    425,000
    
    
    
    $
    205,000Gabriel Leung
Executive Vice President and President,
(OSI) Oncology
    
    
    $
    420,000
    
    
    
    $
    204,000Anker Lundemose, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.
Executive Vice President and President,
(OSI) Prosidion
    
    
    $
    402,250
    
    
    
    $
    196,220Paul Chaney
Executive Vice President and President, (OSI)
Eyetech
    
    
    $
    378,500
    
    
    
    $
    182,000
 (1)
    
    Given the market performance of Macugen® (pegaptanib sodium injection), and the resulting
decision of OSI to exit the eye disease business it acquired through it acquisition of Eyetech
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in November 2005, the Committee concurred with Dr. Goddards
recommendation that he not receive a 2006 bonus or merit increase to his 2007 base salary.
 Cash Bonuses




---



##### 



Name
    
    TargetColin Goddard, Ph.D.
    
    
    *Michael G. Atieh
    
    
    50
    %Gabriel Leung
    
    
    50
    %Paul G. Chaney
    
    
    50
    %Anker Lundemose, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.
    
    
    50
    %
 * No specific target. Determined by the Committee in its discretion.
 Equity Awards
  Perquisites
 -2-




---



##### 



-3-