alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 17.4130 Discontinuation of Veterans Care Agreements. ( a ) Discontinuation of the agreement by the entity or provider requires a written notice of request to discontinue, in accordance with the terms of the Veterans Care Agreement and the following notice requirements: ( 1 ) Written notice must be received by VA at least 45 calendar days before the discontinuation date and must specify the discontinuation date; and
( 2 ) Such notice must be delivered to the designated VA official to which such notice must be submitted under the terms of the Veterans Care Agreement, and the notice and delivery must comply with all terms of the Veterans Care Agreement.
( b ) ( 1 ) Discontinuation of the agreement by VA requires a written notice of discontinuation to the entity or provider in accordance with the terms of the Veterans Care Agreement and the following notice standards: ( i ) Written notice of discontinuation will be issued at least 45 calendar days before the discontinuation date, except as provided in subparagraph (ii).
( ii ) Notice may be issued fewer than 45 calendar days before the discontinuation date, including notice that is effective immediately upon issuance, when VA determines such abbreviated or immediate notice is necessary to protect the health of covered individuals or when such abbreviated or immediate notice is permitted under the terms of the Veterans Care Agreement.
( 2 ) Notice will be delivered to the entity or provider in accordance with the terms of the Veterans Care Agreement.
( 3 ) VA may discontinue a Veterans Care Agreement for the following reasons: ( i ) If VA determines the entity or provider failed to comply substantially with the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1703A or 38 CFR 17.4100-17.4135
( ii ) If VA determines the entity or provider failed to comply substantially with the provisions, terms, or conditions of the Veterans Care Agreement;
( iii ) If VA determines the entity or provider is excluded from participation in a Federal health care program (as defined in section 1128B(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(f)) under section 1128 or 1128A of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7 and 1320a-7a), or is identified as an excluded source on the System for Award Management Exclusions list described in part 9 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations, and part 180 of title 2 of such Code, or successor regulations;
( iv ) If VA ascertains that the entity or provider has been convicted of a felony or other serious offense under federal or state law and determines that discontinuation of the Veterans Care Agreement would be in the best interest of a covered individual or VA; or
( v ) If VA determines it is reasonable to discontinue the Veterans Care Agreement based on the health care needs of a covered individual.
(Office of Management and Budget approved the collection of information under control number 2900-0872) [84 FR 21678, May 14, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 50861, Sept. 13, 2021]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Dairy plants surveyed andapproved for USDA grading service**
 
2003:Jan
2004:Jul | Oct
2005:Oct
2006:Jan | Apr| Oct
2007:Jan
2008:Jul
2009:Oct
2010:Jan
2011:Oct
2013:Jul
 
SuDoc Number:A 88.14/12:
Item Number:0021-Q (online)
CGP systemNumber:000542292
 
June 27, 2019
§ 21.430 Accountability for authorization and payment of training and rehabilitation services. ( a ) *General.* VA shall maintain policies and procedures which provide accountability in the authorization and payment of program costs for training and rehabilitation services. The procedures established under this section are applicable to all program costs except subsistence allowance (or the optional allowance at Chapter 34 rates). Policies and procedures governing payment of subsistence allowance are governed by §§ 21.260 through 21.276, and §§ 21.320 through 21.334.
( b ) *Determining necessary costs for training and rehabilitation services.* The estimates of program costs during a calendar year or lesser period shall be based upon the services necessary to carry out the veteran's rehabilitation plan during that period (§§ 21.80 through 21.96). The estimates will be developed by the VBA case manager. If additional approval is required, the VBA case manager shall secure such additional approval prior to authorization of services.
( c ) *Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) Officer's review of program costs.* The VR&E Officer will review the program costs for the services in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section if the case manager's program cost estimate for a calendar year exceeds $25,000. The VR&E Officer may not delegate this responsibility. The case manager will neither sign a rehabilitation plan nor authorize expenditures before the VR&E Officer approves the program costs. The services subject to this review are: ( 1 ) Providing supplies to help establish a small business;
( 2 ) A period of extended evaluation; or
( 3 ) A program of independent living services. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3115(b)(4))


Cross References:
See § 21.156. Other incidental goods and services. § 21.258. Special assistance for veterans in self-employment. [49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 45767, Dec. 22, 1986; 55 FR 25975, June 26, 1990; 62 FR 17710, Apr. 11, 1997; 84 FR 194, Jan. 18, 2019; 87 FR 8743, Feb. 16, 2022]
§ 21.57 Extended evaluation. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of an extended evaluation for a veteran with a serious employment handicap is to determine the current feasibility of the veteran achieving a vocational goal, when this decision reasonably cannot be made on the basis of information developed during the initial evaluation. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106(c), Pub. L. 99-576)
( b ) *Scope of services.* During the extended evaluation, a veteran may be provided: ( 1 ) Diagnostic and evaluative services;
( 2 ) Services to improve his or her ability to attain a vocational goal;
( 3 ) Services to improve his or her ability to live and function independently in the community;
( 4 ) An allowance as provided in § 21.260. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3104)
( c ) *Determination.* ( 1 ) The determination of the reasonable feasibility of a veteran achieving a vocational goal will be made at the earliest time possible during an extended evaluation, but not later than the end of the period of evaluation, or an extension of that period. Any reasonable doubt as to feasibility will be resolved in the veteran's favor; (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106(d))
( 2 ) When it is reasonably feasible for the veteran to achieve a vocational goal, an individualized written rehabilitation plan (IWRP) will be developed as indicated in § 21.84 of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106(b))
( d ) *Responsibility for determining the need for a period of extended evaluation.* A Counseling Psychologist (CP) or Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor (VRC) in the Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) Division shall determine whether a period of extended evaluation is needed.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106(c))
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 50956, Dec. 19, 1988; 54 FR 37332, Sept. 8, 1989; 62 FR 17707, Apr. 11, 1997; 81 FR 26131, May 2, 2016; 87 FR 8742, Feb. 16, 2022]
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2197 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National 

Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2197 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hopewell Culture Na3 tional Historical Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY EXPANSION. 

5 Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to rename and 

6 expand the boundaries of the Mound City Group National 

7 Monument in Ohio’’, approved May 27, 1992 (106 Stat. 

8 185), is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subsection 

10 (a)(3); 

11 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub12 section (a)(4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

13 (3) by adding after subsection (a)(4) the fol14 lowing new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(5) the map entitled ‘Hopewell Culture Na16 tional Historical Park, Ohio Proposed Boundary Ad17 justment’ numbered 353/80,049 and dated June, 

18 2006.’’; and 

19 (4) by adding after subsection (d)(2) the fol20 lowing new paragraph: 
3 

•HR 2197 EH

1 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may acquire lands added by 

2 subsection (a)(5) only from willing sellers.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2197 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture 

and for other purposes. National Historical Park in the State of Ohio,
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER CASTRO,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2459

[July 6, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Edward Merrigan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-8608 

CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. 

Comras, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, KLINGENSMITH, JJ., and METZGER, ELIZABETH A., Associate Judge, 

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1.200 Purpose.

This subpart establishes a duty upon and sets forth the mechanism for VA employees to report information about actual or possible criminal violations to appropriate law enforcement entities.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. 3, 38 U.S.C. 902)

[68 FR 17550, Apr. 10, 2003]
#### § 18b.24 Date of service.

The date of service shall be the day when the matter is deposited in the U.S. mail or is delivered in person, except that the date of service of the initial notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing shall be the date of its delivery, or of its attempted delivery if refused.
#### Re: JUDICIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE

December 6, 1976

PER CURIAM

In accordance with the resolution adopted by the Arkansas Judicial Council on October 9, 1976, whereby the Council requested that the Supreme Court establish a permanent Judicial Planning Committee to improve the administration of justice in Arkansas, the Judicial Planning Committee of Arkansas is hereby established.

1. The name of the Committee shall be the “Judicial Planning Committee”. It shall meet regularly to perform research and make recommendations on a long-range basis to improve the administration of justice in the Courts of Arkansas. The Committee shall prepare an annual master plan and a multi-year plan for improving the state court system and shall incorporate into its plans special provisions pertaining to criminal justice in the Courts. The Committee may establish advisory committees to assist it in its deliberations and promote involvement of the public, the executive and legislative branches of government, and other interested parties, in its efforts to upgrade the state court system. The Committee shall be empowered to review applications to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration for assistance in court projects, to establish priorities for improving the state court system, and to develop and coordinate programs for improving the courts.

2. The Committee shall consist of twelve members as follows: One Supreme Court Justice to serve as chairman, three Circuit Judges, three Chancery Judges, three Municipal Judges, one Prosecuting Attorney, and one criminal defense attorney or public defender, to serve terms of two years’ duration. A majority shall constitute a quorum. The Arkansas Judicial Department shall assist the Committee, administer its operations, and provide necessary staff subject to the approval of the Committee and this Court.

3. This Court may request recommendations of persons to serve on the Committee from the Arkansas Judicial Coun*735cil, the Arkansas Municipal Judges’ Association, the Arkansas Prosecuting Attorneys’ Association, and the Arkansas Bar Association.

4. This order shall be effective on December 13, 1976.

Byrd, ]., not participating.
#### § 20.403 Rule 403. Notice to contesting parties on receipt of Notice of Disagreement in simultaneously contested claims.

Upon the filing of a Notice of Disagreement in a simultaneously contested claim, all interested parties and their representatives will be furnished a copy of the substance of the Notice of Disagreement. The notice will inform the contesting party or parties of what type of review the appellant who initially filed a Notice of Disagreement selected under § 20.202(b), including whether a hearing was requested.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105A)
#### § 21.9765 Program of education approval.

VA may provide educational assistance for pursuit of a program of education offered by an institution of higher learning if that program of education is approved under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30 in accordance with §§ 21.7220 and 21.7222.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3313(b), 3323(a))
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  First  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Leon Zimmerman,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


November 13, 2002                           /s/Leon Zimmerman
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer
§ 86.33 Human subjects; animal welfare. Where the application is for training at a non-Federal institution, no award may be made under this subpart unless said institution has complied with: ( a ) 45 CFR part 46 pertaining to the protection of human subjects; and
( b ) Chapter 1-43 of the Department Grants Administration Manual[2] concerning animal welfare.
Footnotes -
86.33
[2] See footnote 2 to § 86.19.
#### § 21.7805 Conflicting interests.

In administering benefits payable under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606, VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4005 in the same manner as they are applied in the administration of 38 U.S.C. chapters 34 and 36.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 3683; Pub. L. 98-525)

[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996; 61 FR 29483, June 11, 1996]
#### § 18b.32 Amendment of notice or answer.

The General Counsel may amend the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing once as a matter of course before an answer thereto is served, and each respondent may amend the answer once as a matter of course not later than 10 days before the date fixed for hearing but in no event later than 20 days from the date of service of the original answer. Otherwise a notice or answer may be amended only by leave of the presiding officer. A respondent shall file the answer to an amended notice within the time remaining for filing the answer to the original notice or within 10 days after service of the amended notice, whichever period may be the longer, unless the presiding officer otherwise orders.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
HomeRefugee Admissions...Safe Mobility Initiative

# 									Safe Mobility Initiative							

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

The United States has led the largest expansion in decades of lawful pathways to the United States to help refugees, vulnerable migrants, and other forcibly displaced persons in the Western Hemisphere.

Individuals seeking international protection and other lawful pathways have many options, including seeking refugee resettlement, humanitarian parole, family reunification, labor pathways, and seeking asylum in host countries, as well as various support services provided by international organizations and NGOs.

The Safe Mobility (SMO) initiative is one of the many ways the United States is facilitating access to safe and lawful pathways from partner countries in the region at no cost, so refugees and vulnerable migrants don’t have to undertake dangerous journeys in search of safety and better opportunities.

**There are various pathways available depending on the profile and needs of the applicant:**

The Safe Mobility initiative facilitates expedited refugee processing via the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) and provides information and/or referrals to humanitarian parole, family reunification, and labor pathways through MovilidadSegura.org and Safe Mobility Offices (SMOs) in Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Ecuador.

Tens of thousands of people have already submitted a free application on MovilidadSegura.org.SMOs are reviewing applications for eligibility and international protection needs and contacting applicants to provide information about a potential lawful pathway and to schedule an appointment for further processing.

Individuals in the region seeking international protection and other lawful pathways have several options, including seeking refugee resettlement, humanitarian parole, family reunification, labor pathways, and seeking asylum in host countries, as well as various support services provided by international organizations and NGOs.

Tags

Refugee Admissions

Back to Top
#### § 17.545 Purpose.

The purpose of §§ 17.545 through 17.553 is to establish the Readjustment Counseling Service Scholarship Program (RCSSP) as part of VA's Educational Assistance Program. For purposes of the RCSSP, the term Vet Center has the meaning given that term in 38 U.S.C. 1712A(h).
§ 17.103 Referrals of compromise settlement offers. Any offer to compromise or settle any charges or claim for $20,000 or less asserted by the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection with the medical program shall be referred as follows: ( a ) *To Chief Financial Officers of the Consolidated Patient Account Centers.* If the debt represents charges made under §§ 17.108, 17.110, or 17.111, the compromise offer shall be referred to the Chief Financial Officer of the Consolidated Patient Account Center (CPAC) for application of the collection standards in § 1.900 *et seq.* of this chapter, provided: ( 1 ) The debt does not exceed $1,000, and
( 2 ) There has been a previous denial of waiver of the debt by the CPAC Committee on Waivers and Compromises.
( b ) *To Regional Counsel.* If the debt in any amount represents charges for medical services for which there is or may be a claim against a third party tort-feasor or under workers' compensation laws or Pub. L. 87-693; 76 Stat. 593 (see § 1.903 of this chapter) or involves a claim contemplated by § 1.902 of this chapter over which the Department of Veterans Affairs lacks jurisdiction, the compromise offer (or request for waiver or proposal to terminate or suspend collection action) shall be promptly referred to the field station Regional Counsel having jurisdiction in the area in which the claim arose, or
( c ) *To Committee on Waivers and Compromises.* If one of the following situations contemplated in paragraph (c)(1) through (3) of this section applies ( 1 ) If the debt represents charges made under § 17.101(a), but is not of a type contemplated in paragraph (a) of this section, or
( 2 ) If the debt represents charges for medical services made under § 17.101(b), or
( 3 ) A claim arising in connection with any transaction of the Veterans Health Administration for which the instructions in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or in § 17.105(c) are not applicable, then, the compromise offer should be referred for disposition under § 1.900 *et seq.* of this chapter to the field station Committee on Waivers and Compromises which shall take final action.
[39 FR 26403, July 19, 1974, as amended at 47 FR 58250, Dec. 30, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21966, 21967, May 13, 1996; 62 FR 17072, Apr. 9, 1997; 80 FR 23241, Apr. 27, 2015]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2021

No. 04-20-00467-CV

IN THE COMMITMENT OF STEPHEN PATRICK BLACK

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-1805-CV

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Stephen Patrick Black seeks to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory “Biennial 

Review Order” signed on August 5, 2020 finding that “probable cause does not exist to believe 

that [Black’s] behavioral abnormality has changed to the extent that he is no longer likely to 

engage in a predatory act of sexual violence.” The order did not modify any of the requirements 

of Black’s civil commitment pursuant to Chapter 841 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and 

provided that “[a]ll requirements of the Final Judgment and Order of Commitment signed on 

April 7, 2016 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.” As we noted in our previous 

opinion addressing our jurisdiction over Black’s appeal from his first biennial review order, the 

legislature did not specifically authorize an appeal from the trial court’s initial probable cause 

determination in a biennial review and a biennial review order finding no probable cause does 

not constitute a final judgment. See In re Commitment of Black, 594 S.W.3d 590, 593 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio 2019, no pet.); see also TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 841.101-.103 

(biennial review process), § 841.062(a) (specific authorization to appeal the factfinder’s 

determination after a trial that a person is a sexually violent predator). Absent a final judgment 

or specific legislative authorization to appeal an interlocutory order, we do not have jurisdiction 

over this appeal. In re Commitment of Black, 594 S.W.3d at 593; see also In re Commitment of 

Richards, 395 S.W.3d 905, 908 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2013, pet. denied); In re Graves, No. 09-

17-00287-CV, 2017 WL 4319886, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. 

op.). We note that Black filed a motion requesting permission to appeal the interlocutory order 

which was denied by the trial court.

Accordingly, because it appears that we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we 

order appellant Black to show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this 

order stating (i) why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and (ii) why this 

appeal is not frivolous. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f), 45. All appellate deadlines are suspended 

pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

FILE COPY
_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY