alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 353

To prohibit the export of American black bear viscera, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources and, in addition, to the Committees on International

Relations and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the export of American black bear viscera, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Black Bear Protection

5 Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 353 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPORT OF AMERICAN BLACK

2 BEAR VISCERA.

3 The Secretary of Commerce shall exercise the au4 thorities the Secretary has under the Export Administra5 tion Act of 1979 to prohibit the export from the United

6 States of American black bear viscera.

7 SEC. 3. REPORT BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

8 The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the

9 Secretary of the Treasury, shall prepare and submit to

10 the Congress, not later than 180 days after the date of

11 the enactment of this Act, a report that describes—

12 (1) the effectiveness of the computerized infor13 mation system or any other system of the Fish and

14 Wildlife Service or the United States Customs Serv15 ice that records data on the importation or expor16 tation of wildlife body parts, specifically of the

17 American black bear, to and from the United States;

18 and

19 (2) any plans of the Fish and Wildlife Service

20 to monitor the illegal movement of, or commercial

21 activity in, American black bear viscera or other

22 American black bear body parts.

23 SEC. 4. UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE.

24 The United States Trade Representative shall discuss

25 the issues involving trade in American black bear viscera

26 with the appropriate representatives of those countries
3

•HR 353 IH

1 trading with the United States who are determined jointly

2 by the Secretaries of Commerce and Interior to be the

3 leading importers of American black bear viscera.

4 SEC. 5. DEFINITION.

5 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘American black bear

6 viscera’’ means the gall bladder or any internal organs of

7 an American black bear (Ursus Americanus).

Æ
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Pijush Kanti Sarkar

# 									Pijush Kanti Sarkar							

DS Memorial

January 22, 2002

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2002**

Pijush Kanti Sarkar, Local Law Enforcement, died on January 22, 2002, in Kolkata, India. He was killed protecting the American Cultural Center.

**Photo: Kolkata Police Department image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementIndia

Back to Top
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 719/2005

of 12 May 2005         

fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on products exported in the natural state shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 558/2005 (OJ L 94, 13.4.2005, p. 22).

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(4)OJ L 91, 1.4.1984, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 222/88 (OJ L 28, 1.2.1988, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 12 May 2005 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

----
|   | (i) | the      quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),      whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August      9, 2010 |   |   | /s/HENRY C. PAO                              |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |   | Henry      C. Pao, Ph.D.                     |
|                                  |   |   | President      & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)           |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
In connection with the Quarterly Report of McRae Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ending October 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, D. Gary McRae, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ D. Gary McRae
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – December 2, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – December 2, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

December 1, 2023

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**8:00 p.m**. Secretary Blinken delivers remarks at the Kennedy Center Honors Dinner in Washington, D.C.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### George S. Baxter et al., Respondents, *v.*Gilson, Collins *&*Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

John Jay McKelvey, for appellant.

Allan Lee Smidt, for respondents.

Hascall, J.

Exceptions taken to questions calling for immaterial testimony may be disregarded in considering' this appeal. The actual term's of this contract, for supply of-materials, existing between vendee and a third person, do not affect the merits of this cause, until we arrive at consideration of defendant’s counterclaim.

It is the knowledge of plaintiffs of the existence of such a contract with a stranger, and the disposition of the goods which defendant was to.make after delivery to it by plaintiffs, that should have determined the court below in making its rulings. ' Such special knowledge was a feature that might indicate,- to all the parties, the use to which defendant was to put the goods and-became an element of the contract between plaintiffs and defendant, to be considered in establishing damages, if any, suffered by the vendee for the nondelivery, or late delivery, of the lumber in-question.

We think that the defendant should have had opportunity to substantiate its alleged counterclaim, and this being withheld, by erroneous rulings of the trial court, a new trial must be ordered.

Judgment and order appealed from' reversed and new trial ordered, with costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the 'event.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment and order‘reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. ' '■
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O F TH E SECRETAR Y WASHINGTON , D.C . A•':""' • '" I ' Applicatio n o f CRAI G AI R CENTER , INC . Fo rauthorit yt o conduc t schedule d passenge roperation s a s a commute rai rcarrie runde r4 9 U.S.C.,4173 8 

### poT-oyr-Zoio-oo o t MOTIO N O F CRAI G AI R CENTER , INC . T O WITHHOL D INFORMATIO N FRO M PUBLI C DISCLOSUR E Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t to :

Octobe r23,200 9 Joh n T . Vit o Crai g Ai rCenter , Inc . 855-1 4 St . John s BluffRd . Jacksonville , F L 3222 5 Tel. : (904)641-030 0 Fax : (904)642-201 2 E-Mail : itvito@craiqaircenter.co m

Notice : An yperso n v\/h o wishe s t o support o roppos e thi s applicatio n mus t fil e a n answe rb y[ 7 days afte rreceip t o fth e applicatio n b yth e Departmen t o fTransportation ] an d serv e tha t answe r o n al l person s serve d wit h thi s filing .CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb ycertifytha t I hav e o n thi s da yserve d th e foregoin g motio n fo rconfidentia l treatmen t by firs t clas s mail , postag e prepaid , upo n th e person s show n i n th e followin g servic e list .

Octobe r23 , 200 9 y^Sm n T . Vito , Presid < SERVIC E LIS T Mr . Willia m H . Edward s Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Orland o Fligh t Standard s Distric t Offic e 595 0 Hazeltin e Nationa l Dr . Citade l Int' l - Suit e 50 0 Orlando , F L 3282 2 Jacksonvill e Aviatio n Authorit y P O Bo x1801 8 Jacksonville , F L 32229-801 8 Dept . o fCivi l Aviatio n POBoxN-97 5 Crawfor d St . Nassau , N.P. , Bahama sAFFIDAVI TO F CITIZENSHI P

STAT E O F FLORID A COUNTYO F DUVA L Joh n T . Vit o bein g firs t dul ysworn , depose s an d says : 1 . Tha t h e i s dul yelected , qualified , an d servin g a s Presiden t o fCrai g Ai rCenter , Inc . an d tha t h e i s authorize d t o an d doe s mak e thi s affidavi t fo rit . 2 . Tha t Joh n T . Vit o i s a citize n o fth e Unite d State s withi n th e meanin g o f4 9 U.S.C . 40102(a)(15) .

Dh n T . Vit o Subscribe d an d swor n t o befor e m e thi s y^^4d(Z^C&V^^<::m . 

### I • I I • iii i Wjife^jin " * y ^ NMVMI e •«!*« ( M M 

### ' C0(W*Mlon#OO8»707 7 I C^X^J. ^ S^L^^^-^UyL

^ lon M B yW«BOM I WqOt

yAmi , fNotar

yPubli c (SEAL ) «w««*V<«ir'«"^i^'V W

### AFFIDAVI TO F SAFET YCOMPLIANC E STAT E O F FLORID

A COUNT YO F DUVAL says : Joh n T . Vito bein g firs t dul ysworn , deposes an d

' • toal'di^lt"*XaSr""'" ^ " '"^'^^'"'<=-' = * =»'- • '- • - - -^a,h e I s autabe d Pa« s ,2 , ,135 , a s we . as^-th e no ^ ^i'i'7^'Z!'CrZ:fS^X^T^' " ^ ^

5hn T . Vito Subscribe d an d sworn t o befor e m e this?^da yo f2>ecl^£:^k^ m •yMMM h (SEAL) 

# ^msms

t WlMif PHM B * SMlOlrioiM l

,_CaiwwliiUnfOOSW m '•'"*0 ^ BonMByNailoMlNolMyAttn . ••« ' Notar

yPubli c
§ 18.443 General treatment of students. ( a ) No qualified handicapped student shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic, research, occupational training, housing, health insurance, counseling, financial aid, physical education, athletics, recreation, transportation, other extracurricular, or other aid, benefits, or services operated by a recipient to which this subpart applies.
( b ) A recipient that considers participation by students in education programs or activities not operated wholly by the recipient as part of, or equivalent to, an education program or activity operated by the recipient shall assure itself that the other education program or activity, as a whole, provides an equal opportunity for the participation of qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) A recipient to which this subpart applies may not, on the basis of handicap, exclude any qualified handicapped student from any course, course of study, or other part of its education program or activity.
( d ) A recipient shall operate its program or activity in the most integrated setting appropriate.
[45 FR 63268, Sept. 24, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51370, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO.; Chicago Title Insurance Co., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Kenneth C. COHEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-7904.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1998.

APPEARING FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Allen Kezsbom, Fried, Frank, Haras, Shriver & Jacobson, New York, N.Y.

APPEARING FOR APPELLEES: Steven M. Kayman, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, N.Y.

Present: Honorable Jon O. NEWMAN, Honorable Richard J. CARDAMONE, Honorable Fred I. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

The judgment of the district court is unanimously AFFIRMED. An opinion setting forth the reasons for this disposition will follow shortly.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.6 Public availability of Board records.

(a) *Publication* —

(1) *Generally.* Any Board action is available for public inspection without a party's permission if rendered in a file open to the public pursuant to § 1.11 of this title or in an application that has been published in accordance with §§ 1.211 to 1.221 of this title. The Office may independently publish any Board action that is available for public inspection.

(2) *Determination of special circumstances.* Any Board action not publishable under paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be published or made available for public inspection if the Director believes that special circumstances warrant publication and a party does not, within two months after being notified of the intention to make the action public, object in writing on the ground that the action discloses the objecting party's trade secret or other confidential information and states with specificity that such information is not otherwise publicly available. If the action discloses such information, the party shall identify the deletions in the text of the action considered necessary to protect the information. If the affected party considers that the entire action must be withheld from the public to protect such information, the party must explain why. The party will be given time, not less than twenty days, to request reconsideration and seek court review before any contested portion of the action is made public over its objection.

(b) *Record of proceeding.*

(1) The record of a Board proceeding is available to the public unless a patent application not otherwise available to the public is involved.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, after a final Board action in or judgment in a Board proceeding, the record of the Board proceeding will be made available to the public if any involved file is or becomes open to the public under § 1.11 of this title or an involved application is or becomes published under §§ 1.211 to 1.221 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis

INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL, INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, INC. AND PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2233-10-4 PER CURIAM MARCH 8, 2011 NEZHA ALAOUI

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Joshua M. Wulf; Angela F. Gi bbs; Midkiff, Munc ie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Jin Kim; Chasen Boscol o, on brief), for appellee.

Inova Fairfax Hospital, Inova Health Sy stem Foundation, Inc. and PMA Management Corporation (collectively “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. Employer asserts the commission erred in (1) finding claimant proved her disability, and specifically, the recurrence of post-traumatic headaches, was causally related to her February 12, 2008 workplace injury; (2) finding any disability and medical treatment since August 31, 2009, was causally related to claimant’s workplace injury ; (3) relying on Dr. Rajesh K. Sethi’s medical opinions, diagnosis, and treatm ent to conclude claimant’s disability and medical treatment after August 31, 2009, were causall y related to her wor kplace injury rather than relying on the medical opinion of Dr . John W. Cochran, who reached the opposite conclusion; (4) relying on Dr. Se thi’s medical conclusions when hi s reports failed to explain the recurrence of symptoms after an eight-month laps e in treatment for any symptoms; (5) failing to

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - deny the claim based on inconsistencies in claima nt’s testimony that suggested other possible

causes of her headaches and the duration of symptoms; and (6) failing to deny the claim where all of claimant’s objective tests have been normal and the finding of disability was based solely on claimant’s subjective complaints. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Alaoui v. Inova Fairfax Hosp. , VWC File No. 237-49-81 (Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: March 15, 2005
#### § 20.401 Rule 401. Who can file an appeal in simultaneously contested claims.

In simultaneously contested claims, any claimant or representative of a claimant may file a Notice of Disagreement within the time limits set out in Rule 402 (§ 20.402).

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105(b)(2), 7105A)
§ 12.20 Posting of notice provisions of Pub. L. 382. ( a ) VA Form 10-P-10, Application for Hospital Treatment or Domiciliary Care, includes notice to the applicant that the acceptance of care or treatment by any veteran shall constitute acceptance of the provisions of the act. Similar notice shall be given to each veteran receiving care as of March 26, 1942, by posting notice in a prominent place in each building wherein patients or members are housed. Such notices shall be posted immediately and kept posted.
( b ) Since the provisions of the law are applicable to all veterans receiving care at the expense of the Department of Veterans Affairs (whether in contract, Federal, State or private hospital) it shall be the responsibility of the Department of Veterans Affairs officer authorizing admission of a veteran to other than a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, center or home, to cause the chief officer of such institution to post in a conspicuous place, in all buildings where veterans are housed, the provisions of § 12.19(a), or if he or she declines to post such provisions, notify the patients individually and supply a statement from each acknowledging notice. Such provisions supersede in part the provisions of Form 10-P-10, executed prior to March 26, 1942.
[13 FR 7131, Nov. 27, 1948, as amended at 14 FR 243, Jan. 18, 1949]