alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.711 Rule 711. Hearings in simultaneously contested claims. ( a ) *General.* If a hearing is scheduled for any party to a simultaneously contested claim, the other contesting claimants and their representatives, if any, will be notified and afforded an opportunity to be present. The appellant will be allowed to present opening testimony and argument. Thereafter, any other contesting party who wishes to do so may present testimony and argument. The appellant will then be allowed an opportunity to present testimony and argument in rebuttal. Cross-examination will not be allowed.
( b ) *Requests for changes in hearing dates.* ( 1 ) General. Except as described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, any party to a simultaneously contested claim may request a change in a hearing date in accordance with the provisions of Rule 704, paragraph (c) (§ 20.704(c)).
( 2 ) ( i ) A request under Rule 704, paragraph (c) must be made within 60 days from the date of the letter of notification of the time and place of the hearing, or not later than two weeks prior to the scheduled hearing date, whichever is earlier.
( ii ) In order to obtain a new hearing date under the provisions of Rule 704, paragraph (c) (§ 20.704(c)), the consent of all other interested parties must be obtained and submitted with the request for a new hearing date. If such consent is not obtained, the date of the hearing will become fixed. After a hearing date has become fixed, an extension of time for appearance at a hearing will be granted only for good cause, with due consideration of the interests of other parties. Examples of good cause include, but are not limited to, illness of the appellant and/or representative, difficulty in obtaining necessary records, and unavailability of a necessary witness. The motion for a new hearing date must be in writing and must explain why a new hearing date is necessary. If good cause is shown, the hearing will be rescheduled for the next available hearing date after the appellant or his or her representative gives notice that the contingency which gave rise to the request for postponement has been removed. Ordinarily, however, hearings will not be postponed more than 30 days. Whether good cause for establishing a new hearing date has been shown will be determined by the presiding Member assigned to conduct the hearing.
( 3 ) A copy of any motion for a new hearing date required by these rules must be mailed to all other interested parties by certified mail, return receipt requested. The receipts, which must bear the signatures of the other interested parties, and a letter explaining that they relate to the motion for a new hearing date and containing the applicable Department of Veterans Affairs file number must be filed at the same address where the motion was filed as proof of service of the motion. Each interested party will be allowed a period of 10 days from the date that the copy of the motion was received by that party to file written argument in response to the motion.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105A)
[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 187, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
Flash point

Confidential Business Information
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Population Health Investment Company Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: January 7, 2022  By: /s/ Clive Meanwell   **Clive Meanwell**   **Chief Executive Officer**   **(Principal Executive Officer)****
# Official Journal C 153/10 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4710 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4710 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 153/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 153/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**THE SPE NEWS ON-LINEARCHIVED ISSUES**

----

----

|                                                                                                                                                                                              | October 24, 2003September 30, 2003August 14, 2003July 11, 2003June 10, 2003April 15, 2003March 7, 2003January 10, 2003                                                                               | November 1, 2002October 17, 2002July 15, 2002June 11, 2002May 10, 2002March 25, 2002February 28, 2002January 16, 2002                                                                                | December 17, 2001November 14, 2001October 17, 2001October 10, 2001September 13, 2001August 16, 2001July 25, 2001June 28, 2001May 25, 2001April 23, 2001April 10, 2001March 7, 2001February 8, 2001January 2, 2001 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| October 25, 2000October 3, 2000September 25, 2000September 20, 2000August 24, 2000July 20, 2000June 21, 2000May 25, 2000May 18, 2000April 20, 2000March 16, 2000February 10, 2000January 13, 2000 | November 29, 1999November 9, 1999October 8, 1999September 30, 1999September 24, 1999August 10, 1999July 7, 1999May 28, 1999May 7, 1999March 4, 1999February 17, 1999January 29, 1999January 22, 1999 | December 15, 1998December 4, 1998November 23, 1998November 3, 1998September 24, 1998August 20, 1998June 24, 1998June 1, 1998May 8, 1998April 24, 1998March 16, 1998February 17, 1998January 20, 1998 | December 18, 1997November 25, 1997October 31, 1997October 10, 1997                                                                                                                                                |
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0856 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM093AD
747 -25 - 3381 --- 8/19/10 777 -25 - 0362 IN 01 --- 2/27/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report
of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

*/s/ Garry L.
Anselmo*Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer

January 21, 2009

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7613

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL J. PAVLOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,

District Judge. (1:10-cr-00007-IMK-RWT-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Pavlock, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew R. Cogar, Shawn 

Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Clarksburg, 

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Pavlock appeals the district court’s orders

denying his third motion for an extension of time to respond to 

the Government’s motion for a final order of forfeiture, and 

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Pavlock, No. 

1:10-cr-00007-IMK-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 10, 2014; Sept. 15, 

2014; Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   June 2, 2004



/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  June 2, 2004



/s/ Matthew Farrell
Matthew Farrell 
 Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC LAW 107–156—MAR. 31, 2002 116 STAT. 117

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2019:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Mar. 14, considered and passed Senate.

Mar. 19, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 107–156

107th Congress

An Act

To extend the authority of the Export-Import Bank until April 30, 2002.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXPORT-IMPORT BANK.

Notwithstanding the dates specified in section 7 of the ExportImport Bank Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635f) and section 1(c) of Public

Law 103–428, the Export-Import Bank of the United States shall

continue to exercise its functions in connection with and in furtherance of its objects and purposes through April 30, 2002.

Approved March 31, 2002.

12 USC 635f

note.

Mar. 31, 2002

[S. 2019]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2240 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to restore the Office for 

National Capital Region Coordination to the administrative jurisdiction 

of the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. WYNN, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, 

Mr. WOLF, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to restore 

the Office for National Capital Region Coordination to 

the administrative jurisdiction of the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office for National 

5 Capital Region Coordination Restoration Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2240 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF OFFICE FOR NATIONAL CAPITAL 

2 REGION COORDINATION TO ADMINISTRATIVE 

3 JURISDICTION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SEC4 RETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 

5 (a) RESTORATION.—The Office for National Capital 

6 Region Coordination shall be administered within the Of7 fice of the Secretary as provided in section 882(a)(1) of 

8 the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 462(a)(1). 

9 (b) OTHER AUTHORITY NOT APPLICABLE.—Section 

10 882 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 462) 

11 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(e) OTHER AUTHORITY NOT APPLICABLE.—The 

13 authority under section 872(a) does not extend to the Of14 fice for National Capital Region Coordination.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 12.1 Designee cases; competent veterans. ( a ) *Designees—general.* ( 1 ) Upon admission to a VA field facility, VA will request and encourage a competent veteran to designate in writing, on the relevant VA form, an individual to whom VA will deliver the veteran's funds and effects in the event of the veteran's death in such VA field facility. The individual named by the veteran is referred to in this part as the designee.
( 2 ) The veteran may change or revoke a designation in writing, on the relevant VA form, at any time.
( 3 ) If the veteran does not name a designee or if a designee is unable or unwilling to accept delivery of funds or effects, § 12.5 Nondesignee cases, applies.
( 4 ) The designee may not be a VA employee unless such employee is a member of the veteran's family. For purposes of this section, a family member includes the spouse, parent, child, step family member, extended family member or an individual who lives with the veteran but is not a member of the veteran's family.
( 5 ) To be effective, a completed form must be received by the facility head or facility designee prior to the veteran's death.
( b ) *Delivery of funds and effects.* The delivery of the veteran's funds or effects to the designee is only a delivery of possession. Such delivery of possession does not affect in any manner: ( 1 ) The title to such funds or effects; or
( 2 ) The person legally entitled to ownership of such funds or effects.
( c ) *Veteran becomes incompetent.* If a veteran is determined to be incompetent pursuant to an order of a state court or is determined to be unable to manage monetary VA benefits by a VA clinician after the veteran is admitted to a VA field facility, the VA field facility staff will contact the Veterans Benefits Administration for the application of 38 CFR 3.353, regarding an incompetency rating as to whether the veteran is able to manage monetary VA benefits, and, if appropriate, 38 CFR 13.55, regarding VA fiduciary appointments. If the Veterans Benefits Administration determines that a veteran is incompetent to manage monetary VA benefits, any designation by the veteran under paragraph (a) of this section will cease with respect to VA benefits that are deposited by VA into the Personal Funds of Patients. The veteran's designation will not change with respect to disposition of funds and personal effects derived from non-VA sources, unless a court-appointed guardian or conservator changes or revokes the existing designation.
( d ) *Retention of funds and effects by a veteran.* Upon admission to a VA field facility, VA will encourage a competent veteran to: ( 1 ) Place articles of little or no use to the veteran during the period of care in the custody of a family member or friend; and
( 2 ) Retain only such funds and effects that are actually required and necessary for the veteran's immediate convenience.
(The information collection is pending Office of Management and Budget approval.) (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8502)
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirement in this section under control number 2900-0817 [79 FR 68129, Nov. 14, 2014]
#### Jose Roberto FERNANDEZ-RUIZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74533.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 2005.

Erica K. Rocush, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner.

Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz, I&NS— Service Processing Center, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of The District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Donald E. Keener, Esq., John J. Andre, Esq., DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1953 Eighth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  January 3, 1953 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1952 Sixth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  July 1, 1952 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1952 Seventh Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  April 2, 1952 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1952 Sixth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  January 8, 1952 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1952 Fifth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  January 1, 1952 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1951 Fifth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  April 6, 1951 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1951 Fourth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  April 1, 1951 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1950 Fourth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  July 20, 1950 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1950 Third Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information (Summary)	  July 1, 1950 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1950 Third Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  April 18, 1950 

previous page1…11121314next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN: 0648-XR82


Catch Share Workshop; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) will hold a 
Catch Share Workshop for Council members, staff, its Advisory Panel 
Chairmen, the Science and Statistical Committee Chairman and Mid-
Atlantic Council members. The intent of this meeting is to share 
information and concerns about the use of catch shares in NEFMC managed 
fisheries; help decision makers learn from successes, failures and 
challenges in other regions and place catch shares in context with what 
has already been approved in New England with an eye toward future 
direction and action.

DATES: The workshop will be held on October 20 and October 21, 2009. 
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific dates and times.

ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held at the Mount Washington Resort, 
310 Mount Washington Road, Route 302, Bretton Woods, NH 03575; 
telephone: (603) 278-8854; fax: (603) 278-7907.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The workshop will begin at 9 a.m. on 
Tuesday, October 20, 2009 and recess at 5 p.m., or when business is 
complete; reconvene at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, October 21, 2009 and 
recess at 5 p.m., or when business is complete.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 22, 2009.
William D. Chappell,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-23210 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S