alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2243 

To better provide for compensation for certain persons injured in the course 

of employment at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To better provide for compensation for certain persons injured in the course of employment at the Santa Susana 

Field Laboratory in California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF MEMBER OF SPECIAL EXPO4 SURE COHORT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3621(14) of the Energy 

6 Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

7 Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following new subparagraph: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2243 IH

1 ‘‘(D) The employee was so employed for a 

2 number of work days aggregating at least 250 

3 work days before January 1, 2006, by the De4 partment of Energy or a Department of Energy 

5 contractor or subcontractor at the Santa 

6 Susana Field Laboratory in California.’’. 

7 (b) REAPPLICATION.—A claim that an individual 

8 qualifies, by reason of section 3621(14)(D) of the Energy 

9 Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

10 Act of 2000 (as added by subsection (a) of this Act), for 

11 compensation or benefits under such Act shall be consid12 ered for compensation or benefits notwithstanding any de13 nial of any other claim for compensation with respect to 

14 such individual. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 384.6 Verification of royalty payments. ( a ) *General.* This section prescribes procedures by which the Collective may verify the royalty payments made by a Licensee.
( b ) *Frequency of verification.* The Collective may conduct a single audit of a Licensee, upon reasonable notice and during reasonable business hours, during any given calendar year, for any or all of the prior 3 calendar years, but no calendar year shall be subject to audit more than once.
( c ) *Notice of intent to audit.* The Collective must file with the Copyright Royalty Judges a notice of intent to audit a particular Licensee, which shall, within 30 days of the filing of the notice, publish in the Federal Register a notice announcing such filing. The notification of intent to audit shall be served at the same time on the Licensee to be audited. Any such audit shall be conducted by an independent and Qualified Auditor identified in the notice, and shall be binding on all parties.
( d ) *Acquisition and retention of report.* The Licensee shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain or to provide access to any relevant books and records maintained by third parties for the purpose of the audit. The Collective shall retain the report of the verification for a period of not less than 3 years.
( e ) *Acceptable verification procedure.* An audit, including underlying paperwork, which was performed in the ordinary course of business according to generally accepted auditing standards by an independent and Qualified Auditor, shall serve as an acceptable verification procedure for all parties with respect to the information that is within the scope of the audit.
( f ) *Consultation.* Before rendering a written report to the Collective, except where the auditor has a reasonable basis to suspect fraud and disclosure would, in the reasonable opinion of the auditor, prejudice the investigation of such suspected fraud, the auditor shall review the tentative written findings of the audit with the appropriate agent or employee of the Licensee being audited in order to remedy any factual errors and clarify any issues relating to the audit; Provided that the appropriate agent or employee of the Licensee reasonably cooperates with the auditor to remedy promptly any factual errors or clarify any issues raised by the audit.
( g ) *Costs of the verification procedure.* The Collective shall pay the cost of the verification procedure, unless it is finally determined that there was an underpayment of 10% or more, in which case the Licensee shall, in addition to paying the amount of any underpayment, bear the reasonable costs of the verification procedure.
[73 FR 16199, Mar. 27, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 66278, Nov. 5, 2013]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 340/2005

of 25 February 2005         

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 21 to 24 February 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(2)OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

----
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 1, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-14032 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:08-cv-60630-CMA

EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LP, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Counter-

 Defendant-Appellant,

 versus

KARIN LENZ, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Cross-

 Defendant-Appellee,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Internal Revenue Service,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Cross-Claimantllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Counter-Claimant-Appellee.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(April 1, 2011)
Before BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Equity Investment Partners, LP appeals the district court’s final judgment,

entered after a bench trial, holding that the United States’ federal tax lien on

certain real property located in Florida has priority over Equity’s mortgages on the

same property under 26 U.S.C. § 6323. After hearing witness testimony at trial,

the district court made adverse credibility findings that resolved the factual issues

in this case, and to which we defer. Based thereupon, we find no reversible error

in the district court’s final judgment in favor of the United States.

AFFIRMED.

 Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District *

of Florida, sitting by designation.

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repligen Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the undersigneds knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                              |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Walter C. Herlihy                        |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President        |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |    
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Daniel W. Muehl                          |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer                      |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |
Exhibit 10.79


 


	
   

  	
  July 2, 2003

  



 


 


	
  John Wille

  c/o Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.

  111 Bauer Drive

  Oakland, NJ 07436

  



 


Dear John:


 


As you know, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the
exploration of a possible sale of the Company, although no decision to effect a
sale has been made and there can be no assurance that it will occur or as to
the timing thereof.


 


The Board of Directors believes that your continued service as an
executive and effective participation in the exploration of a possible sale is
important to the Company.  Accordingly,
the Board of Directors has determined that if an unaffiliated purchaser
acquires substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock or assets through
a negotiated transaction on or before December 31, 2003, and you remain
employed by the Company through the consummation of that transaction, you will
be awarded a special bonus of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars
($150,000).  (If for any reason you are
not employed by the Company when the sale is consummated, you will not be
entitled to any payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation
to which you may be entitled from the Company. 
Nothing in this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with
the Company or creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you
as an employee.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Angelica Berrie

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica Berrie

  Chief Executive Officer
-77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

★

●

● ● ●
#### § 18b.57 Evidence.

Irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable, and unduly repetitious evidence will be excluded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                       595
<INVENTORY>                                      9,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,352
<PP&E>                                          26,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,507
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,426
<SALES>                                         25,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,925
<CGS>                                           14,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
#### § 20.701 Rule 701. Who may present oral argument.

Only the appellant and/or his or her authorized representative may appear and present argument in support of an appeal. At the request of an appellant, a Veterans Benefits Counselor of the Department of Veterans Affairs may present the appeal at a hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7105, 7107)

[58 FR 27935, May 12, 1993]
Exhibit 32

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 17, 2004                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer

May 17, 2004                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 83.10 If a petition satisfies all relevant requirements under § 83.9, does this mean the class will be added to the Cohort?

Satisfying the informational requirements for a petition does not mean the class will be added to the Cohort. It means the petition will receive a full evaluation by NIOSH, the Board, and HHS, as described under §§ 83.13 through 83.16. The role of the petitioner(s) is to identify classes of employees that should be considered for addition to the Cohort.
§ 17.109 Presumptive eligibility for psychosis and mental illness other than psychosis. ( a ) *Psychosis.* Eligibility for benefits under this part is established by this section for treatment of an active psychosis, and such condition is exempted from copayments under §§ 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 for any veteran of World War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam era, or the Persian Gulf War who developed such psychosis: ( 1 ) Within 2 years after discharge or release from the active military, naval, or air service; and
( 2 ) Before the following date associated with the war or conflict in which he or she served: ( i ) World War II: July 26, 1949.
( ii ) Korean conflict: February 1, 1957.
( iii ) Vietnam era: May 8, 1977.
( iv ) Persian Gulf War: The end of the 2-year period beginning on the last day of the Persian Gulf War.
( b ) *Mental illness (other than psychosis).* Eligibility under this part is established by this section for treatment of an active mental illness (other than psychosis), and such condition is exempted from copayments under §§ 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 for any veteran of the Persian Gulf War who developed such mental illness other than psychosis: ( 1 ) Within 2 years after discharge or release from the active military, naval, or air service; and
( 2 ) Before the end of the 2-year period beginning on the last day of the Persian Gulf War.
( c ) *No minimum service required.* Eligibility for care and waiver of copayments will be established under this section without regard to the veteran's length of active-duty service.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1702, 5303A)
[78 FR 28143, May 14, 2013]
# Official Journal L 316/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 316 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 647 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 316

English edition

Legislation

Volume 647 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1454 of 6 September 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 6614)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1454 of 6 September 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 6614)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 6614)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 1.901 No private rights created.

Sections 1.900 through 1.953 do not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any other person, nor shall the failure of VA to comply with any of the provisions of §§ 1.900 through 1.953 be available to any debtor as a defense.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 38 U.S.C. 501)

[69 FR 62191, Oct. 25, 2004]
§ 17.4030 Eligible entities and providers. To be eligible to furnish care and services under the Veterans Community Care Program, entities or providers: ( a ) Must enter into a contract, agreement, or other arrangement to furnish care and services under the Veterans Community Care Program under §§ 17.4000 through 17.4040.
( b ) Must either: ( 1 ) Not be a part of, or an employee of, VA; or
( 2 ) If the provider is an employee of VA, not be acting within the scope of such employment while providing hospital care, medical services, or extended care services through the Veterans Community Care Program under §§ 17.4000 through 17.4040.
( c ) Must be accessible to the covered veteran. VA will determine accessibility by considering the following factors: ( 1 ) The length of time the covered veteran would have to wait to receive hospital care, medical services, or extended care services from the entity or provider;
( 2 ) The qualifications of the entity or provider to furnish the hospital care, medical services, or extended care services from the entity or provider; and
( 3 ) The distance between the covered veteran's residence and the entity or provider.
#### § 10.29 Claims for benefits because of elimination of preferred dependent.

A dependent, in subsequent position in the order of preference as defined in section 601 of title VI of the Act, as amended, who makes claim for the benefits of the Act in consequence of the death of a dependent who made application and who stood in preferential position as defined in section 601 of the act, as amended, shall be required to furnish, in support of such claim, proof of death of said dependent. Proof of death of said dependent shall be in accordance with the requirements for proof of death as outlined in the regulations of Department of Veterans Affairs. A dependent who makes claim for the benefits of the act because of remarriage of a widow who did not make and file application before remarriage shall be required to furnish in support of such claim proof of remarriage of said widow. Proof of remarriage of said widow shall be in accordance with the requirements for proof of marriage as outlined in regulations of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
#### PERKINS-CAMPBELL COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[57 C. Cls. 623; 264 U. S. 213]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Where an award, made under the Dent Act for expenses incurred under a war contract, was accepted, with payment, by the claimant, in full discharge of the obligations of the United States under the contract, re-formation of the award is a prerequisite to recovery of additional compensation in the Court of Claims.

It is not a ground for re-forming such an award that the claimant, before accepting it, was advised by Army officers believed to be acting under directions of the board that examined the case, that acceptance would not waive further claim under the contract.

Allegations of a petition *held*insufficient as a basis for re-forming an award on the ground of mutual mistake by the claimant and the United States.

Mr. Justice SaNeoed

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 18, 1924.
HomeDSS Press Releases...FinCEN Issues Notice on the Use of Counterfeit U.S. Passport Cards to Perpetrate Identity Theft and Fraud Schemes at Financial Institutions

# 									FinCEN Issues Notice on the Use of Counterfeit U.S. Passport Cards to Perpetrate Identity Theft and Fraud Schemes at Financial Institutions							

DSS Releases

April 15, 2024

FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK RELEASE

For Immediate release – April 15, 2024

**Click here to read more about this**

 

Tags

District of ColumbiaDSS ReleasesFraudPassportsUnited States

Back to Top