alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 11

<TABLE>

                                CML GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


For the periods ended February 1, 1997
and January 27, 1996

<CAPTION>
                                          Second Quarter                   Six Months
                                          --------------                   ----------
                                       1997           1996           1997             1996
                                       ----           ----           ----             ----

<S>                                 <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>       
Primary loss per share:
Weighted average number of
   shares outstanding:
Common                              49,810,109      49,129,197      49,758,660      49,176,906
Shares deemed outstanding from:
   Assumed issuance of deferred
      compensation awards              105,000         105,000         105,000         105,000
   Assumed exercise of stock
      options                          164,545         325,311         258,645         383,720
                                   -----------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Total                               50,079,654      49,559,508      50,122,305      49,665,626
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============

Net loss                           $(5,185,000)   $(30,053,000)   $(18,836,000)   $(45,071,000)
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============

Primary loss per share             $     (0.10)   $      (0.61)   $      (0.38)   $      (0.91)
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============ 
Weighted average number of
   shares outstanding, as above     50,079,654      49,559,508      50,122,305      49,665,626
Shares deemed outstanding from
   the assumed conversion of
   convertible subordinated
   debentures                        1,604,877       1,604,877       1,604,877       1,604,877
Additional shares deemed
   outstanding from the assumed
   exercise of stock options                --              --          24,635              --
                                   -----------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Total                               51,684,531      51,164,385      51,751,817      51,270,503
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============

Additional income from the
   elimination of the interest
   cost of the convertible
   subordinated debentures, net
   of income tax effect            $   446,000    $    398,000    $    800,000    $    779,000
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============

Fully diluted loss per share       $     (0.10)   $      (0.61)   $      (0.38)   $      (0.91)
                                   ===========    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>





                                       19
#### § 19.22 Substantive Appeal.

A Substantive Appeal consists of a properly completed VA Form 9, “Appeal to Board of Veterans' Appeals,” or correspondence containing the necessary information. If the Statement of the Case and any prior Supplemental Statements of the Case addressed several issues, the Substantive Appeal must either indicate that the appeal is being perfected as to all of those issues or must specifically identify the issues appealed. The Substantive Appeal should set out specific arguments relating to errors of fact or law made by the agency of original jurisdiction in reaching the determination, or determinations, being appealed. To the extent feasible, the argument should be related to specific items in the Statement of the Case and any prior Supplemental Statements of the Case. The Board will construe such arguments in a liberal manner for purposes of determining whether they raise issues on appeal, but the Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination, or determinations, being appealed. The Board will not presume that an appellant agrees with any statement of fact contained in a Statement of the Case or a Supplemental Statement of the Case which is not specifically contested. Proper completion and filing of a Substantive Appeal are the last actions the appellant needs to take to perfect an appeal.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2900-0085)

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105(d)(3)-(5) (2016))

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 20450, May 7, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 177, 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0026]


Apothecon et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 103 New Drug 
Applications and 35 Abbreviated New Drug Applications; Correction

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of February 11, 2009 (74 FR 
6896). The document announced the withdrawal of approval of 103 new 
drug applications (NDAs) and 35 abbreviated new drug applications 
(ANDAs). The document published with an error in the identification of 
the ANDA for Amiodarone Hydrochloride Injection, 50 milligrams/
milliliter, held by Hospira, Inc. This document corrects that error.

DATES:  Effective March 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Florine P. Purdie, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6366, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In FR Doc. E9-2901, appearing on page 6896 
in the Federal Register of Wednesday, February 11, 2009, the following 
correction is made:
    On page 6900, in the first column of the table, third item from the 
bottom of the page, the entry ``ANDA 75-108'' is corrected to read 
``ANDA 76-108''.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Douglas C. Throckmorton,
Deputy Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E9-23170 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 10.16


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT is entered
into as of August 7, 2003 by and among Graphic Packaging
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Riverwood
International Corporation) (“Employer”), Graphic Packaging Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (formerly Riverwood Holding, Inc.) (“Graphic”)
and                      (“Executive”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Executive,
Graphic and the Employer are parties to an Employment Agreement, as amended,
dated as of [date] (the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Executive,
Graphic and the Employer wish to amend a certain provision of the employment
Agreement addressing the incentive compensation payable to the Executive.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, each of the
Executive, Graphic and the Employer, for good and valid consideration, agree as
follows:


 


1.  Amendment to
Section 4(a). 
Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“(a) Incentive Compensation.
During the Employment Period, Executive shall participate in Employer’s
incentive compensation programs for its similarly situated executives existing
from time to time, at a level commensurate with his position and duties with
Employer and based on such performance targets as may be established from time
to time by employer’s Board or a committee thereof.”


 


2.  Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly amended hereby, all of
the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement are hereby reaffirmed and
remain in full force and effect. The words “this Agreement,” “hereof,”
“herein,” “hereby” and words of similar import when used in the Employment
Agreement shall refer to the Employment Agreement as amended hereby. This
Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York without reference to principles of conflict of laws. The
section and other headings contained in this Amendment are for reference
purposes and shall not affect the meaning or interpretations of this Amendment.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer
and Graphic have duly executed this Agreement by their authorized
representatives, and Executive has hereunto set his hand, in each case
effective as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  GRAPHIC PACKAGING CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Executive:

  
	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


2
*The National Map* - Washington-Idaho Pilot Project - RETIRED EDITION**Fact Sheet 114-01 (November 2001)**

PLEASE NOTE:
This fact sheet has been replaced by the fact sheet titled "***The National Map***Pilot Projects" located at:
mac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs06202.html for the HTML versionandmac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs06202.pdf for the PDF version
Most browsers will automatically load the new version in 20 seconds.
| Top | Main Table of Contents| MappingPublications| Eastern Region Geography | Geography Home |

U.S. Department of the Interior — U.S. Geological Survey — 509 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA **URL:***http://mac.usgs.gov/mac/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs11401.html* — **Contact:**[email protected]**Page Maintainer:** USGS Eastern Region Geography**Last modified:**   14:26:55 Tue 31 Dec 2002 — USGS Privacy Policy and Disclaimers— Accessibility
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeOffice of Foreign Missions...Regional Offices – Office of Foreign Missions

# 									Regional Offices – Office of Foreign Missions							

The Office of Foreign Missions (OFM) has six regional offices located throughout the United States.  Each OFM regional office is responsible for regulating the activities of foreign missions located outside the National Capital Region in accordance with both the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States.
        - Chicago, IL
        - Houston, TX
        - Los Angeles, CA
        - Miami, FL
        - New York City, NY
        - San Francisco, CA

 

Current days and times OFM’s regional offices are open to foreign missions.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 224

     To provide that no Federal funds may be used for the design, 
renovation, construction, or rental of any headquarters for the United 
   Nations in any location in the United States unless the President 
   transmits to Congress a certification that the United Nations has 
 adopted internationally-recognized best practices in contracting and 
                              procurement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide that no Federal funds may be used for the design, 
renovation, construction, or rental of any headquarters for the United 
   Nations in any location in the United States unless the President 
   transmits to Congress a certification that the United Nations has 
 adopted internationally-recognized best practices in contracting and 
                              procurement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE DESIGN, RENOVATION, 
              CONSTRUCTION, OR RENTAL OF ANY HEADQUARTERS FOR THE 
              UNITED NATIONS IN ANY LOCATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be used for the design, 
renovation, construction, or rental of any headquarters for the United 
Nations in any location in the United States.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall cease to be effective if the 
President transmits to Congress a certification that the United Nations 
has adopted internationally-recognized best practices in contracting 
and procurement.
                                 <all>
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0856

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM093AD

747-25-3381 --- 8/19/10

777-25-0362 IN 01 --- 2/27/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### ROBERTS V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 13, 1912.)

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court,

Heai’d before Hon. Mike Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Briokell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

deGraffenried, J.

Affirmed.
§ 1.302 Applicability and scope. ( a ) The provisions of §§ 1.300 through 1.303 apply to VA medical facility parking facilities in the United States, its territories and possessions, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and to such parking facilities for the use of VA medical facilities jointly shared by VA and another Federal agency when the facility is operated by the VA. Sections 1.300 through 1.303 apply to all users of those parking facilities. Fees shall be assessed and collected at medical facilities where parking garages are constructed, acquired, or altered at a cost exceeding $500,000 (or, in the case of acquisition by lease, $100,000 per year). The Secretary, in the exercise of official discretion, may also determine that parking fees shall be charged at any other VA medical facility.
( b ) All fees established shall be reasonable under the circumstances and shall cover all parking facilities used in connection with such VA medical facility.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8109)
[53 FR 25490, July 7, 1988]
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  First  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Allen R. Christenson,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


November 13, 2002                           /s/Allen R. Christenson
                                            --------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer



                                      -22-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONNA P. BECKNAULD,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 78 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Southern Railway Co. *v.*Graham.

*Damage to Stock.*

(Decided April 18, 1912.

58 South. 672.)

*Appeal and Error; Bill of Exceptions; Necessity.*— To review an order quashing a writ of certiorari, it is essential that the order and the motion to quash be embodied in a bill of exceptions, and thus presented for review.

Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. John T. Lackland.

Action by John S. Graham against the Southern Railway for injury to stock. From a judgment quashing the writ of certiorari to bring up tbe case from the justice to the Circuit Court, the defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Wilson & Tucker, for appellant.

The court erred in quashing the *writ.*— Hines *v.*Tribble, 57 South. 265; *Gray v. Dean,*3 Ala. 716; *Boyd v. Woodfin,*3 Stew. 357; Section 3259, Code 1907.

John S. Graham, pro se.

The court ivas without power to issue the writ, and hence, properly granted the motion to quash it. — Subd. 1, sec. 3259, Code 1907; 3 A. & E. Enc. of Law, 60; 75 Ala. 491; 63 Ala. 153.

*399PELHAM, J.

The appeal in this case is prosecuted from a judgment of the circuit court of Clarke county quashing, on motion of appellee, (plaintiff in the trial court), the writ of certiorari by which the case was brought to that court from the court of a justice of the peace, and dismissing the proceeding in the circuit court. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor does it show that an exception was reserved to the action of the court in granting the motion. To be reviewable here, the motion and the ruling thereon must be shown by bill of exceptions, and not being thus Shown, an affirmation necessarily *follows.*—City *of Jasper v. Barton,*1 Ala. App. 472, 56 South. 42; *Hooper v. State,*141 Ala. 111, 37 South. 662; *Wilson v. State,*136 Ala. 114, 33 South. 831; *Randall v. Wadsworth,*130 Ala. 633, 31 South. 555; *Cottingham v. Greely,*129 Ala. 200, 30 South. 560, 87 Am. St. Rep. 58; *Holley v. Coffee,*123 Ala. 406, 26 South. 239.

Affirmed.
41974.

#### CANNON v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted for the offense of burglary of the “storehouse and place of business of U. S. Mosaic Tile Co., Inc., where valuable goods were contained, within intent to steal.” A motion for new trial was overruled and on appeal the sole contention of the defendant is that there was no evidence “that the place alleged to have been burglarized contained any articles of value or that any goods contained therein have any value.” *Held:*

1. “A part of the offense of burglary under *Code*§ 26-2401 is as follows: ‘Burglary is the breaking and entering into the dwelling, mansion *or storehouse,*or other place of business of another, where *valuable*goods, wares, produce or any other article of *value*are contained or stored.’ The exact value of the property contained in the storehouse or other place of business need not be shown, but, in order to complete the offense, it is necessary to show that some article of property was contained in the place entered, and that such property had some value. *McCrary v. State,*96 Ga. 348 (23 SE 409); *Peterson v. State,*6 Ga. App. 491 (1) (65 SE 311).” *Tyler v. State,*89 Ga. App. 535 (80 SE2d 78).

*702Submitted May 3, 1966

Decided May 10, 1966

Rehearing denied May 19, 1966.

*Wesley R. Asinof, J. R. Parham,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, Solicitor General, J. Walter LeCraw, George K. McPherson, Jr.,*for appellee.

2. Evidence that a named item of personal property was in the building but not showing that such personal property had a value is insufficient to authorize a verdict in a burglary case. *Tyler v. State,*89 Ga. App. 535, supra.

3. In the case sub judice photographs, identified as showing the interior of the building, were introduced in evidence which showed numerous items of personalty contained therein, and while such evidence would be insufficient to prove an exact value of the personal property shown therein, yet it was sufficient to authorize a finding that such personalty had some value.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
§ 17.30 Definitions. When used in Department of Veterans Affairs medical regulations, each of the following terms shall have the meaning ascribed to it in this section: ( a ) *Medical services.* The term *medical services* includes the following: ( 1 ) Medical examination, treatment, and rehabilitative services (as defined in 38 U.S.C. 1701(8)).
( 2 ) Surgical services, dental services and appliances as authorized in §§ 17.160 through 17.166, optometric and podiatric services, chiropractic services, preventive health care services set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1701(9), noninstitutional extended care, and items and services as authorized in §§ 17.3200 through 17.3250.
( 3 ) Consultation, professional counseling, marriage and family counseling, training, and mental health services for the members of the immediate family or legal guardian of the veteran or the individual in whose household the veteran certifies an intention to live, as necessary in connection with the veteran's treatment.
( 4 ) Transportation and incidental expenses for any person entitled to such benefits under the provisions of § 70.10 of this chapter. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1701(6))
( b ) *Domiciliary care.* The term domiciliary care— ( 1 ) Means the furnishing of: ( i ) A temporary home to a veteran, embracing the furnishing of shelter, food, clothing and other comforts of home, including necessary medical services; or
( ii ) A day hospital program consisting of intensive supervised rehabilitation and treatment provided in a therapeutic residential setting for residents with mental health or substance use disorders, and co-occurring medical or psychosocial needs such as homelessness and unemployment.
( 2 ) Includes travel and incidental expenses pursuant to § 70.10.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1701(4))
[23 FR 6498, Aug. 22, 1958] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 17.30, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*