alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41751.

#### HAGGARD v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. Statements made under oath upon the trial of the case being heard are not declarations but testimony. *Crawley v. Selby,*208 Ga. 530, 536 (67 SE2d 775).

2. “One may be legally convicted of a felony other than treason or perjury where the only evidence directly connecting him *186with the offense charged is the testimony of an accomplice, and where the only corroboration is the testimony of other accomplices.” *Pope v. State,*171 Ga. 655 (156 SE 599).

Submitted January 5, 1966

Decided February 23, 1966.

*Ballard & Thigpen, Troy R. Thigpen,*for appellant.

*Richard Bell, Solicitor General,*for appellee.

3. *“*‘It is not error to admit evidence which is objected to as a whole when any part of that objected to is admissible. A party objecting to evidence must specify the portion which is objectionable, and if he fails to point out exactly that portion which is objectionable and move its exclusion he cannot complain that the whole of the evidence objected to, a part of which was admissible, was admitted over his objection. . . . *Gully v. State,*116 Ga. 527 (2) (42 SE 790).’ *Turner v. McKee,*97 Ga. App. 531, 536 (103 SE2d 658).” *Brantley v. Heller,*101 Ga. App. 16, 18 (112 SE2d 685).

4. Where a defendant admits his presence at the scene of a crime and knowledge of the commission of the crime, but in the same breath denies his participation in such crime, the statement is not a confession but at most an incriminating admission.

5. Where a defendant makes an incriminating admission, not amounting to a confession, it is error to charge the law on confessions. See *Johnson v. State,*204 Ga. 528 (50 SE2d 334); *Hobbs v. State,*206 Ga. 94 (1) (55 SE2d 610). The trial court erred in charging on confessions.

6. The remaining enumerations of error deal with matters which will probably not recur on another trial and which, accordingly, will not be dealt with.

*Case remanded for new trial.*

*Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.*
§ 21.262 Procurement and reimbursement of cost for training and rehabilitation services, supplies, or facilities. ( a ) *General.* Whenever services, supplies and facilities from source outside VA are required by any of these regulations, they shall be provided through contract, agreement of other cooperative arrangement between VA and the vendor. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3115(b))
( b ) *VA Acquisition Regulations.* Payments of charges for training and rehabilitation services, supplies, or facilities, authorized under Chapter 31 are subject to the provisions of applicable VA Acquisition Regulations especially 48 CFR part 831 and subpart 871.2.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3115(a))
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silverado Gold Mines
Ltd;

1.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

2.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

3.      The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Issuers fiscal quarter ending
August 31, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.

4.      The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditor and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: October 16, 2006

/s/ Garry L. Anselmo Garry
L. Anselmo Principal Executive Officer

---
#### § 18b.11 Use of number.

As used in this part, words importing the singular number may extend and be applied to several persons or things, and vice versa.

[51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
#### Matter of Judicial Settlement of the Account of Frank Geis, as Administrator of Francis J. Geis, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

May, 1899.)

Surrogate’s Court — Power to try an issue whether a legacy was assigned.

The court of the surrogate has power to try the question whether an assignment of a legacy, executed by a decedent to his widow and recognized by his administrator by payment thereunder as Valid, was ever made by the decedent, as such an issue is purely- one of fact and does not call for the exercise of any equitable powers.

Exceptions to referee’s report.

Andrew Blake, for contestant.

.Norman A. Lawlor, for administrator.

John E. Burke and Frederick A. Camp, for executors.

Varnum, S.

This motion was argued before .Surrogate Arnold and has now been submitted to me for decision. The administrator herein -paid the proceeds of a certain legacy given by decedent to the latter’s widow, in recognition of an alleged assignment. The referee properly found that no such assignment took place, and that the 'account of the administrator should be surcharged with the amount of the moneys so paid out by him. It is contended that the court had no jurisdiction to try this issue. . I.t is true that, where an apparently valid assignment of a legacy is attacked on the ground of fraud or mistake, the Surrogate’s Court, not being a tribunal with equity powers, has no jurisdiction to determine the validity of the paper. Matter of Randall, 152 N. Y. 508. Such is not the case here, however. The question whether or not the decedent made the assignment under which the administrator assumed to act presented an issue of fact not *491calling for the exercise of any equity power. The issue was not the validity, but the. existence of an assignment. The administrator, by allowing the claim made to the proceeds of the legacy, did not preclude the persons interested in the estate from inquiring into his act and contesting its propriety. Matter of Perry’s Estate, 5 Misc. Rep. 149; 25 N. Y. Supp. 716, 720. It appearing that a will of the decedent has been probated, and letters issued thereunder, since the filing of the report of the referee, the payments directed cannot at this time be made. In all other respects, the exceptions filed are overruled, and the report will be confirmed. The decree to be entered should direct the administrator to pay the surplus in his hands to the executor, to whom letters have been issued.

Decreed accordingly.
#### § 1.201 Employee's duty to report.

All VA employees with knowledge or information about actual or possible violations of criminal law related to VA programs, operations, facilities, contracts, or information technology systems shall immediately report such knowledge or information to their supervisor, any management official, or directly to the Office of Inspector General.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. 3, 38 U.S.C. 902)

[68 FR 17550, Apr. 10, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2039 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2039

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the alternative 
                fuel vehicle refueling property credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2007

  Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the alternative 
                fuel vehicle refueling property credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE REFUELING PROPERTY 
              CREDIT.

    (a) Increase in Credit Amount.--Section 30C of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to alternative fuel vehicle refueling property 
credit) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``30 percent'' in subsection (a) and 
        inserting ``50 percent'', and
            (2) by striking ``$30,000'' in subsection (b)(1) and 
        inserting ``$50,000''.
    (b) Extension of Credit.--Subsection (g) section 30C of such Code 
(relating to termination) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Termination of Availability of Credit.--This section shall 
not apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2014.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
#### PRESSLER, MEMBER, U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES *v.*BLUMENTHAL, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, et al.

No. 76-1005.

Decided May 16, 1977

Per Curiam.

The motion of We the People for leave to file a brief, as *amicus curiae,*is granted. The motion of James W. Jeffords, et al., for leave to file a brief, as *amici curiae,*is granted.

Appellant challenges the operation of certain provisions of the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act of 1967, 2 U. S. C. §§ 351-361, and of the 1975 Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act, 2 U. S. C. § 31 (1970 ed., Supp. V), relating to increases in salaries paid members of Congress. He asserts that the operation of these Acts violates Art. I, § 1, and § 6, cl. 1 (the Ascertainment Clause), of the Constitution.

On April 4, 1977, Congress passed an amendment to the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act. On April 12, the President signed that amendment into law. Pub. L. 95-19, 91 Stat. 45.

It appearing that the amendment to the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act will alter materially the scope and perhaps the nature of appellant's suit, the judgment of the District *170Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of the new legislation.

*It is so ordered.*

Me. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint.
116 STAT. 132 PUBLIC LAW 107–169—MAY 7, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 861:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–16 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): Apr. 18, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–169

107th Congress

An Act

To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States Code.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1) through

(4) of subsection (a) 2 ems;

(2) by striking ‘‘Where’’ in such paragraphs and inserting

‘‘where’’;

(3) by striking the period at the end of paragraphs (1),

(2), and (3) of subsection (a) and inserting a semicolon and

by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (3);

(4) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and

(5) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Where an award’’ and

inserting ‘‘If an award’’, by inserting a comma after ‘‘expired’’,

and by redesignating the paragraph as subsection (b).

Approved May 7, 2002.

May 7, 2002

[H.R. 861]
#### § 303.8 Construction and waiver.

The regulations of the Copyright Royalty Judges in this chapter are intended to provide efficient and just administrative proceedings and will be construed to advance these purposes. For purposes of an individual proceeding, the provisions of subchapters A and B may be suspended or waived, in whole or in part, upon a showing of good cause, to the extent allowable by law.
§ 17.104 Terminations and suspensions. Any proposal to suspend or terminate collection action on any charges or claim for $20,000 or less asserted by the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection with the medical program shall be referred as follows: ( a ) *Of charges for medical services.* If the debt represents charges made under §§ 17.108, 17.110, or 17.111 questions concerning suspension or termination of collection action shall be referred to the Chief Financial Officer of the Consolidated Patient Account Center for application of the collection standards in § 1.900 *et seq.* of this chapter, or
( b ) *Of other debts.* If the debt is of a type other than those contemplated in paragraph (a) of this section, questions concerning suspension or termination of collection action shall be referred in accordance with the same referral procedures for compromise offers (except the Fiscal activity shall make final determinations in terminations or suspensions involving claims of $150 or less pursuant to the provisions of § 1.900 *et seq.* of this chapter.)
[34 FR 7807, May 16, 1969, as amended at 39 FR 26403, July 19, 1974. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21966, 21967, May 13, 1996; 80 FR 23241, Apr. 27, 2015]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 38782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15434]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8361]

Lifting of Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) Proliferation 
Sanctions Against Chinese Entities

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made, pursuant to Section 81(e) of 
the Arms Export Control Act and Section 11C(e) of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979, as amended, to lift nonproliferation 
measures on Chinese entities.

DATES:  Effective Date: Upon publication in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela K. Durham, Office of Missile, 
Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation, Bureau of International 
Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State, Telephone (202) 
647-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 81(e) of the Arms Export 
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2798(d)) and Section 11C(e) of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2410c(d)), the 
Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security 
determined and certified to Congress that lifting sanctions on the 
following Chinese entities, their sub-units and successors is important 
to the national security interests of the United States:

1. China Machinery and Equipment Import Export Corporation
2. China National Machinery and Equipment Import Export Corporation
3. CMEC Machinery and Electric Equipment Import and Export Company Ltd.
4. CMEC Machinery and Electrical Import Export Company, Ltd.
5. China Machinery and Electric Equipment Import and Export Company

    These restrictions were imposed on July 9, 2002 (see Volume 67 FR 
Public Notice 4071).

    Dated: June 21, 2013.
 Thomas M. Countryman,
Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2013-15434 Filed 6-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-03-P
```
Supporting Materials #2 

Current and Projected Emissions Inventory 

See Attachment: 

+ Revised GRIC EI 2007
#### § 18b.55 Depositions.

Upon such terms as may be just, for the convenience of the parties or of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the presiding officer may authorize or direct the testimony of any witness to be taken by deposition.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.151 Admissibility.

Evidence that is not taken, sought, or filed in accordance with this subpart shall not be admissible.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CLARIDGE
HOTEL AND CASINO CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000730409
<NAME> Claridge Hotel and Casino Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                    US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                        10,356,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,904,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,341,000
<INVENTORY>                                      267,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19,446,000
<PP&E>                                        41,851,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                13,146,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               132,444,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         43,897,000
<BONDS>                                       85,020,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (26,750,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 132,444,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              92,991,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 54,545,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              34,208,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 418,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,337,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,517,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,517,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,517,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>