# Official Journal C 118/4 Ap

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 118 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 594 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 118

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 594 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2016/C 118/1 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2016/C 118/1

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2016/C 118/2 | Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) | 2 |
| 2016/C 118/3 | Case C-652/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße | 2 |
| 2016/C 118/4 | Case C-655/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by Panrico, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 October 2015 in Case T-534/13 Panrico v OHIM | 3 |
| 2016/C 118/5 | Case C-662/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG v BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH | 4 |
| 2016/C 118/6 | Case C-680/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 December 2015 — Asklepios Kliniken Langen-Seligenstadt GmbH v Ivan Felja | 5 |
| 2016/C 118/7 | Case C-681/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 December 2015 — Asklepios Dienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH v Vittoria Graf | 6 |
| 2016/C 118/8 | Case C-685/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich | 7 |
| 2016/C 118/9 | Case C-689/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2015 — W.F. Gözze Frottierweberei GmbH, Wolfgang Gözze v Verein Bremer Baumwollbörse | 8 |
| 2016/C 118/10 | Case C-2/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 4 January 2016 — Criminal proceedings against J. S. R. | 8 |
| 2016/C 118/11 | Case C-7/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo (Spain) lodged on 6 January 2016 — Banco Popular Español, S.A. and PL Salvador, S.A.R.L. v María Rita Giráldez Villar and Modesto Martínez Baz | 9 |
| 2016/C 118/12 | Case C-20/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Wolfram Bechtel and Marie-Laure Bechtel v Finanzamt Offenburg | 10 |
| 2016/C 118/13 | Case C-21/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Euro Tyre BV v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira | 11 |
| 2016/C 118/14 | Case C-22/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Fondul Proprietatea SA v SC Hidroelectrica SA | 11 |
| 2016/C 118/15 | Case C-42/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Finland | 12 |
| 2016/C 118/16 | Case C-58/16: Action brought on 1 February 2016 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany | 13 |
| 2016/C 118/17 | Case C-66/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-462/13 Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi v Commission | 14 |
| 2016/C 118/18 | Case C-67/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and Centre de Telecomunicacions i Tecnologies de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya (CTTI) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-465/13 Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and CTTI v Commission | 15 |
| 2016/C 118/19 | Case C-68/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-487/13, Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, S.A. v Commission | 16 |
| 2016/C 118/20 | Case C-69/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Cellnex Telecom S.A. and Retevisión I, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-541/13, Abertis Telecom S.A. and Retevisión I v Commission | 17 |
| 2016/C 118/21 | Case C-70/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, S.A. (Retegal) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Joined Cases T-463/13 and T-464/13 Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Retegal v Commission | 19 |
| 2016/C 118/22 | Case C-81/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 February 2016 by the Kingdom of Spain against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-461/13 Spain v Commission | 21 |
| | General Court |
| 2016/C 118/23 | Joined Cases T/546/13, T-108/14 and T-109/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Šumelj and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Accession of Croatia to the European Union — Repeal before accession of national legislation providing for the creation of the profession of public enforcement officer — Harm suffered by the persons previously appointed as public enforcement officers — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures ensuring compliance with the accession commitments — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 36 of the Act of Accession) | 23 |
| 2016/C 118/24 | Case T-210/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings — Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 23 |
| 2016/C 118/25 | Case T-240/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Bodson and Others v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Contractual nature of the employment relationship — Reform of the remuneration scheme and salary progression at the EIB — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion — Errors of law) | 24 |
| 2016/C 118/26 | Case T-241/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Bodson and Others v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Contractual nature of the employment relationship — Remuneration — Reform of the EIB rewards scheme — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion — Errors of law) | 25 |
| 2016/C 118/27 | Case T-402/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — FCC Aqualia v OHIM — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (AQUALOGY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark AQUALOGY — Earlier Community word mark AQUALIA and earlier national figurative mark aqualia — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 25 |
| 2016/C 118/28 | Case T-411/14: Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2016 — Coca-Cola v OHIM (Shape of a contour bottle without fluting) (Community trade mark — Application for three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a contour bottle without fluting — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 26 |
| 2016/C 118/29 | Case T-507/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Vidmar and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Accession of Croatia to the European Union — Repeal before accession of national legislation establishing the profession of bailiff — Loss suffered by persons formerly appointed as bailiffs — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure fulfilment of accession commitments — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 36 of the Act of Accession) | 27 |
| 2016/C 118/30 | Case T-543/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — provima Warenhandels v OHIM — Renfro (HOT SOX) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark HOT SOX — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 27 |
| 2016/C 118/31 | Joined Cases T-589/14 and T-772/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — Musso v Parliament (Emoluments of Members of the Parliament — Old-age pension — Obligation for French Members to claim their pension rights from the national schemes — Rule against overlapping — Implementing measures for the Statute for Members — Decision adopted at the conclusion of the complaint procedure — Debit note — Decision to suspend payment of the pension — Adversarial principle — Reasonable period — Obligation to state reasons) | 28 |
| 2016/C 118/32 | Case T-692/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — Puma v OHIM — Sinda Poland (Representation of an animal) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative mark representing an animal — Earlier international figurative marks representing a puma — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 29 |
| 2016/C 118/33 | Case T-761/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2016 — Consolidated Artists v OHIM — Body Cosmetics International (MANGO) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark MANGO — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 30 |
| 2016/C 118/34 | Case T-816/14: Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2016 — Tayto Group v OHIM — MIP METRO (REAL HAND COOKED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark REAL HAND COOKED — Earlier national figurative mark real QUALITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Misuse of power — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 64, 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 30 |
| 2016/C 118/35 | Case T-279/13: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Ezz and Others v Counsel (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and against associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicants on the list of persons targeted — Legal basis — Failure to fulfil the criteria for listing — Error of law — Error of fact — Right to property — Damage to reputation — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons — Amendment of the claims and pleas in law — Lis pendens — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 31 |
| 2016/C 118/36 | Case T-639/14: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2016 — DEI v Commission (State aid — Complaints — Rejection decisions — Commission’s preliminary assessment — Final decision — Repeal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate) | 32 |
| 2016/C 118/37 | Case T-34/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — Republic of Lithuania v Commission | 32 |
| 2016/C 118/38 | Case T-38/16: Action brought on 28 January 2016 — EEB v Commission | 34 |
| 2016/C 118/39 | Case T-41/16: Action brought on 28 January 2016 — Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry and Others v Commission | 34 |
| 2016/C 118/40 | Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament) | 35 |
| 2016/C 118/41 | Case T-62/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Doosan Infracore (PUMA) | 36 |
| 2016/C 118/42 | Case T-71/16 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-82/12 De Nicola v EIB | 37 |
| 2016/C 118/43 | Case T-72/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — BBY Solutions v EUIPO — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY mobile) | 37 |
| 2016/C 118/44 | Case T-73/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-37/12 De Nicola v EIB | 38 |
| 2016/C 118/45 | Case T-75/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-128/11 De Nicola v EIB | 39 |
| 2016/C 118/46 | Case T-76/16: Action brought on 17 February 2016 — Ikos v EUIPO (AEGYPTISCHE ERDE) | 40 |
| 2016/C 118/47 | Case T-78/16: Action brought on 16 February 2016 — Sartour v Parliament | 40 |
| 2016/C 118/48 | Case T-79/16: Action brought on 19 February 2016 — Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and Others v Commission | 41 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2016/C 118/49 | Case F-33/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 24 February 2016 — Labiri v EESC | 43 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2016/C 118/2

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

2

2016/C 118/3

Case C-652/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße

2

2016/C 118/4

Case C-655/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by Panrico, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 October 2015 in Case T-534/13 Panrico v OHIM

3

2016/C 118/5

Case C-662/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG v BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH

4

2016/C 118/6

Case C-680/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 December 2015 — Asklepios Kliniken Langen-Seligenstadt GmbH v Ivan Felja

5

2016/C 118/7

Case C-681/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 December 2015 — Asklepios Dienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH v Vittoria Graf

6

2016/C 118/8

Case C-685/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich

7

2016/C 118/9

Case C-689/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2015 — W.F. Gözze Frottierweberei GmbH, Wolfgang Gözze v Verein Bremer Baumwollbörse

8

2016/C 118/10

Case C-2/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 4 January 2016 — Criminal proceedings against J. S. R.

8

2016/C 118/11

Case C-7/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo (Spain) lodged on 6 January 2016 — Banco Popular Español, S.A. and PL Salvador, S.A.R.L. v María Rita Giráldez Villar and Modesto Martínez Baz

9

2016/C 118/12

Case C-20/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Wolfram Bechtel and Marie-Laure Bechtel v Finanzamt Offenburg

10

2016/C 118/13

Case C-21/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Euro Tyre BV v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

11

2016/C 118/14

Case C-22/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 15 January 2016 — Fondul Proprietatea SA v SC Hidroelectrica SA

11

2016/C 118/15

Case C-42/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

12

2016/C 118/16

Case C-58/16: Action brought on 1 February 2016 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

13

2016/C 118/17

Case C-66/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-462/13 Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi v Commission

Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi

Commission

14

2016/C 118/18

Case C-67/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and Centre de Telecomunicacions i Tecnologies de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya (CTTI) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-465/13 Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and CTTI v Commission

15

2016/C 118/19

Case C-68/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-487/13, Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, S.A. v Commission

Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, S.A.

Commission

16

2016/C 118/20

Case C-69/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Cellnex Telecom S.A. and Retevisión I, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-541/13, Abertis Telecom S.A. and Retevisión I v Commission

Abertis Telecom S.A. and Retevisión I

Commission

17

2016/C 118/21

Case C-70/16 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2016 by Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, S.A. (Retegal) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Joined Cases T-463/13 and T-464/13 Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Retegal v Commission

19

2016/C 118/22

Case C-81/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 February 2016 by the Kingdom of Spain against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-461/13 Spain v Commission

21

General Court

2016/C 118/23

Joined Cases T/546/13, T-108/14 and T-109/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Šumelj and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Accession of Croatia to the European Union — Repeal before accession of national legislation providing for the creation of the profession of public enforcement officer — Harm suffered by the persons previously appointed as public enforcement officers — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures ensuring compliance with the accession commitments — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 36 of the Act of Accession)

23

2016/C 118/24

Case T-210/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings — Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

23

2016/C 118/25

Case T-240/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Bodson and Others v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Contractual nature of the employment relationship — Reform of the remuneration scheme and salary progression at the EIB — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion — Errors of law)

24

2016/C 118/26

Case T-241/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Bodson and Others v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Contractual nature of the employment relationship — Remuneration — Reform of the EIB rewards scheme — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion — Errors of law)

25

2016/C 118/27

Case T-402/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — FCC Aqualia v OHIM — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (AQUALOGY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark AQUALOGY — Earlier Community word mark AQUALIA and earlier national figurative mark aqualia — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

25

2016/C 118/28

Case T-411/14: Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2016 — Coca-Cola v OHIM (Shape of a contour bottle without fluting) (Community trade mark — Application for three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a contour bottle without fluting — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

26

2016/C 118/29

Case T-507/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Vidmar and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Accession of Croatia to the European Union — Repeal before accession of national legislation establishing the profession of bailiff — Loss suffered by persons formerly appointed as bailiffs — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure fulfilment of accession commitments — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 36 of the Act of Accession)

27

2016/C 118/30

Case T-543/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — provima Warenhandels v OHIM — Renfro (HOT SOX) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark HOT SOX — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

27

2016/C 118/31

Joined Cases T-589/14 and T-772/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — Musso v Parliament (Emoluments of Members of the Parliament — Old-age pension — Obligation for French Members to claim their pension rights from the national schemes — Rule against overlapping — Implementing measures for the Statute for Members — Decision adopted at the conclusion of the complaint procedure — Debit note — Decision to suspend payment of the pension — Adversarial principle — Reasonable period — Obligation to state reasons)

Musso

Parliament

28

2016/C 118/32

Case T-692/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — Puma v OHIM — Sinda Poland (Representation of an animal) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative mark representing an animal — Earlier international figurative marks representing a puma — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

29

2016/C 118/33

Case T-761/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2016 — Consolidated Artists v OHIM — Body Cosmetics International (MANGO) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark MANGO — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)

Consolidated Artists

OHIM

Body Cosmetics International (MANGO)

30

2016/C 118/34

Case T-816/14: Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2016 — Tayto Group v OHIM — MIP METRO (REAL HAND COOKED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark REAL HAND COOKED — Earlier national figurative mark real QUALITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Misuse of power — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 64, 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009)

30

2016/C 118/35

Case T-279/13: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Ezz and Others v Counsel (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and against associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicants on the list of persons targeted — Legal basis — Failure to fulfil the criteria for listing — Error of law — Error of fact — Right to property — Damage to reputation — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons — Amendment of the claims and pleas in law — Lis pendens — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

31

2016/C 118/36

Case T-639/14: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2016 — DEI v Commission (State aid — Complaints — Rejection decisions — Commission’s preliminary assessment — Final decision — Repeal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate)

32

2016/C 118/37

Case T-34/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — Republic of Lithuania v Commission

Republic of Lithuania

Commission

32

2016/C 118/38

Case T-38/16: Action brought on 28 January 2016 — EEB v Commission

34

2016/C 118/39

Case T-41/16: Action brought on 28 January 2016 — Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry and Others v Commission

34

2016/C 118/40

Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)

35

2016/C 118/41

Case T-62/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Doosan Infracore (PUMA)

36

2016/C 118/42

Case T-71/16 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-82/12 De Nicola v EIB

37

2016/C 118/43

Case T-72/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — BBY Solutions v EUIPO — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY mobile)

37

2016/C 118/44

Case T-73/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-37/12 De Nicola v EIB

38

2016/C 118/45

Case T-75/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-128/11 De Nicola v EIB

39

2016/C 118/46

Case T-76/16: Action brought on 17 February 2016 — Ikos v EUIPO (AEGYPTISCHE ERDE)

40

2016/C 118/47

Case T-78/16: Action brought on 16 February 2016 — Sartour v Parliament

40

2016/C 118/48

Case T-79/16: Action brought on 19 February 2016 — Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and Others v Commission

41

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2016/C 118/49

Case F-33/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 24 February 2016 — Labiri v EESC

43

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN