alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                             993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                       347
<INVENTORY>                                     56,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,706
<PP&E>                                         121,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,925
<BONDS>                                         50,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,746
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,557
<SALES>                                        137,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,551
<CGS>                                          112,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (590)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)
        

</TABLE>
41237.

#### DEKALB COUNTY v. DEASON.

Frankum, Judge.

1. This court, on November 16, 1965, rendered an opinion in this case in which it held that the petition failed to state a cause of action against the county, and that the trial court erred in so much of its order as overruled the defendant’s general demurrer. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed this court as to that ruling. See *Deason v. DeKalb County,*222 Ga. 63 (148 SE2d 414). Accordingly, the judgment of this court reversing the trial court in so far as its order overruled the defendant’s general demurrer has been vacated, and we hold in conformity with the ruling and judgment of the Supreme Court that the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s general demurrer.

2. When this case initially came to this court on a bill of exceptions under the former appellate practice and procedure the plaintiff in error, DeKalb County, assigned error on the single judgment of the trial court which overruled the defendant’s general demurrer, overruled the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment, and granted the plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment. With respect to the latter portions of the judge’s order relating to the motion for a summary judgment, this court, being in doubt as to whether the Civil and Criminal Court of DeKalb County is a court of record within the meaning of that term as used in Section 9 of the Act approved March 17, 1959 (Ga. L. 1959, p. 234; *Code Ann.*§ 110-1209), so as to be authorized thereby to grant summary judgments in cases pending therein, certified that question to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court answered that question in the negative. See *DeKalb County v. Deason,*221 Ga. 237 (144 SE2d 446). In conformity with that opinion of the Supreme Court, we hold that the Judge of the Civil and Criminal Court of DeKalb County erred in ■ denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment made upon the ground that the Civil and Criminal Court of DeKalb County was not a court of record and in rendering a summary judgment for the plaintiff, since that court had no jurisdiction to render summary judgments. Therefore, so much of the judgment as purported to render a summary judgment for the plaintiff must be reversed. *556
      *Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part.*

Decided April 29, 1966.

*George P. Dillard, Herbert 0. Edwards, Robert E. Mozley,*for appellant.

*E. T. Hendon, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
#### § 18.402 Application.

This part applies to each recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs and to each program or activity that receives such assistance.

[45 FR 63268, Sept. 24, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51370, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 17.256 Amended or supplemental applications.

An amended application, or an application for a supplemental grant, may be considered either before or after final action has been taken on the original application. Amended applications and applications for supplemental grants shall be subject to the same terms, conditions and requirements necessary for original applications.

[33 FR 6012, Apr. 19, 1968. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
§ 1.984 Request for a hearing. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in § 1.982, an employee wishing a hearing on the existence or amount of the debt or on the proposed offset schedule must send such a request to the office which sent the notice of the debt. The employee must also specify whether an oral or paper hearing is requested. If an oral hearing is requested, the request should explain why the matter cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence. The request must be received by the office which sent the notice of the debt not later than 30 calendar days from the date of the notice.
( b ) If the employee files a request for a hearing after the expiration of the 30 day period provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, VA may accept the request if the employee shows that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive the written notice of the filing deadline (unless the employee has actual notice of the filing deadline).
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
[52 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 62203, Oct. 25, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

          - 10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
          - RIN 1991-AB77

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44273). In this document, DOE amended its Financial Assistance Regulations to update, streamline, and simplify the general rules, and also removed regulations governing the DOE Financial Assistance Appeals Board.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective September 28, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, U.S. Department of Energy, at 202-287-1342, or by e-mail at                         *jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E9-20299, appearing on page 44273 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Friday, August 28, 2009, the following correction is made:                

§ 600.6 

On page 44275, third column, § 600.6, introductory paragraph (c), the phrase “DOE may award a grant or cooperative agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of the follow selection criteria:” is corrected to read “DOE may award a grant or cooperative agreement or technology investment agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of the follow selection criteria:”.

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 21, 2009.

Edward R. Simpson,

Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, Office of Management, Department of Energy.

Joe Waddell,

Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, National Nuclear Security Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-23188 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
# C_2008094EN.01S00301.xml

| 16.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 16 April 2008, in Official Journal of the European Union C 94 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Third supplement to the 26th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see: http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.14.1



Letter from Edge Executive


To:  Verdisys

I, Scott Sossen, CEO of Edge Capital, acknowledge that Verdisys, Inc has
performed under the contract dated June 16, 2003 as amended, and I accept the
work performed under the contract through the period ended September 30, 2003. I
acknowledge that Edge Capital owes Verdisys $1,696,000 at September 30, 2003 and
is due and payable. I hereby commit Edge Capital to pay such amount within the
next two weeks.
#### § 18.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.

[29 FR 19301, Dec. 31, 1964. Redesignated at 45 FR 63268, Sept. 24, 1980]
#### Samuel Rosenstock et al., as Executors, Etc., Appellants, *v.*Clara Montague, Respondent.

Appeal-from an order in favor of the defendant, entered upon a •verdict directed by the court, • \

Emanuel Arñstéin (Ahner C. Thomas, of counsel), for appellants. . 1

Robert E. Redficld, for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

judgment appealed from 'affirmed, with costs.

Present: O’Dwyee and Sohuohmax, Jj.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 20.108 Rule 108. Delegation of authority to Chairman and Vice Chairman, Board of Veterans' Appeals. The Chairman and/or Vice Chairman have authority delegated by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to: ( a ) Approve the assumption of appellate jurisdiction of an adjudicative determination which has not become final in order to grant a benefit, and
( b ) Order VA Central Office investigations of matters before the Board.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 303, 512(a))
[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated at 84 FR 177, Jan. 18, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of CML Group, Inc. for the three months ended
November 2, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                      41,928,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,609,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,527,000
<INVENTORY>                                 37,566,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           117,693,000
<PP&E>                                      93,472,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,696,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,693,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,899,000
<BONDS>                                     41,593,000
<COMMON>                                     5,274,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,739,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,693,000
<SALES>                                     66,958,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,958,000
<CGS>                                       29,371,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,371,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               379,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             461,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,497,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (7,846,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,651,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,651,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        



















</TABLE>
§ 21.6320 Authorization of services under Chapter 31 rules. ( a ) *General.* Sections 21.320 through 21.334 of this part are not applicable to a veteran pursuing a vocational training program except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2))
( b ) *Applicable rule.* Section 21.326 of this part pertaining to the beginning and ending dates of a period of employment services is applicable to veterans under this temporary program.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524(b)(2))
#### § 18b.53 Exhibits.

Proposed exhibits shall be exchanged at the prehearing conference, or otherwise prior to the hearing if the presiding officer so requires. Proposed exhibits not so exchanged may be denied admission as evidence. The authenticity of all proposed exhibits exchanged prior to hearing will be deemed admitted unless written objection thereto is filed prior to the hearing or unless good cause is shown at the hearing for failure to file such written objection.
41764.

#### A.A.A. PARKING, INC. v. BIGGER.

Argued January 11, 1966

Decided April 20, 1966

Rehearing denied May 3, 1966

Bell, Presiding Judge.

1. This case involves a factual situation similar to that in *A.A.A. Parking, Inc. v. Bigger,*ante, and is between the same plaintiff and the same defendant but involves a different automobile. The original petition alleged demand for the return of the bailed property and the bailee’s refusal to redeliver. While this allegation of a breach of duty was in terms appropriate to an action ex delicto, in trover, it was appropriate also to an action ex contractu. Other allegations of the petition did not reveal whether the plaintiff intended to proceed in contract or in tort. The defective petition was susceptible of being construed as proceeding under either theory and was therefore ambiguous. Under these circumstances it was the right of plaintiff, at his own option, to treat his action as one arising from contract or as one sounding in tort and to amend so as to show clearly whether he was suing for a tort or for a breach of contract. *King v. Southern R. Co.,*128 Ga. 285, 288 (57 SE 507); *Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse &c. Co.,*157 Ga. 434, 455 (122 SE 327); *Jenkins v. Seaboard A. L. R.,*3 Ga. App. 381, 384 (59 SE 1120); *Raines v. Rice,*65 Ga. App. 68, 73 (15 SE2d 246). The trial court did not err in allowing the amendment.

2. Decision upon defendant’s general demurrer to the amended petition is controlled by *A.A.A. Parking, Inc. v. Bigger,*ante. The trial court did not err in overruling the general demurrer.

3. The trial court did not err in overruling defendant’s special demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

*585*Charles W. Bergman,*for appellant.

*Henning & Martin,*for appellee.
#### § 21.9735 Other required reports.

VA will apply the provisions of § 21.7156 to individuals and institutions of higher learning under 38 U.S.C. chapter 33 as those provisions are applied to veterans and educational institutions under 38 U.S.C. chapter 30.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3323(a))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,626
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         114,766
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,895
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,565
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         83,163
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,366
<DEPOSITS>                                     134,244
<SHORT-TERM>                                       290
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,726
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,485
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 151,366
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,802
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,212
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   228
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,242
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,878
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,890
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      153
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   8
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    179
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         179
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,259
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    384
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,302
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      146
<RECOVERIES>                                        41
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,350
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               736
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            614
        

</TABLE>
Municipal Airport 

Phone (928) 764-3330 • Fax (928) 764-2310 LAKE HAVASU CITY 

----------------------------------

February 15, 2016 

Mr. James T. Brown 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Director, Office of Airport Compliance 

And Management Analysis 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington. DC 20591 

Dear Mr. Brown; 

Thank you for your time on the telephone during the week of February 8th addressing questions 

regarding the Jet Fuel tax issue and allowing an extension to convey of our City Action Plan 

response which follows. 

Lake Havasu City Tax Code § 3.04.422 provides for a three cents ($.03) per gallon tax on the 

sale of jet fuel by businesses with permanent business locations within City limits. The Lake 

Havasu City Finance Department has identified businesses the tax on 

aviation fuel sales. 

current practice is to include jet fuel TPT revenues with other categories of TPT collections and 

deposit those funds Into the City's General Fund. 

In order to prospectively comply with the Federal Aviation Administration Policy and Procedures 

Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel (79 Fed. Reg. 

6628) (Amendment), the City will include in its Fiscal Year 2016-17 (Beginning July 1, 2016) 

Annual Budget a provision to allocate the TPT revenues collected on the sale of aviation fuel to 

the City's Airport Enterprise Fund. The City Council, which serves as the City's legislative 

board, is required by State Statute to formally adopt an annual budget by the third Monday in 

July (A.R.S. § 42-17101). The City is committed to complying with the Amendment on an 

ongoing basis by allocating the revenue to the Airport Enterprise Fund each year after June 30, 

2017. 

To comply with the budget provision, each month the City's Finance Department will allocate the 

revenues identified as collections from the three cent per gallon tax on aviation jet fuel to a 

separate revenue account in the Airport Enterprise Fund. This revenue will be expended in 

accordance with the Airport Fund's operating and/or capital budget. 

5600 North Hwy. 95, #1• Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404 

www.lhcaz.gov 
Should you have any further questions please contact Ms. Tabatha Miller at 928 854 4230. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

R. Steven Johnston 

Airport Supervisor 

Lake Havasu Municipal Airport
§ 21.414 Revision of decision. The revision of a decision on which an action is based is subject to the following regulations: ( a ) Clear and unmistakable error, § 3.105(a);
( b ) Difference of opinion, § 3.105(b);
( c ) Character of discharge, § 3.105(c);
( d ) Severance of service-connection, § 3.105(d);
( e ) Reduction to less than compensable evaluation, § 3.105(e); (See §§ 21.48, 21.322, and 21.324)
( f ) Review of decisions, § 21.416.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5104B, 5108, and 5112)
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984, as amended at 84 FR 193, Jan. 18, 2019]