alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          26,062                  26,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,435                  54,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,347                  87,347
<PP&E>                                       2,295,290               2,295,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,055                 255,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,141,626               6,141,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,742,168               1,742,168
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    817,000                 817,000
<COMMON>                                    10,079,864              10,079,864
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,023,412)             (7,023,412)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,141,626               6,141,626
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,789                 129,340
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               706,201               1,038,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,624                   9,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (656,036)               (918,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (656,036)               (918,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (656,036)               (918,298)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)                   (.02)
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.

1.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

2.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

3.     
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)      Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

(b)      Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     
Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Issuers fiscal quarter ending
February 29, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.

4.      The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditor and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)      All
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b)      Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date: April 14, 2008 | /s/ *Garry L. Anselmo*     
|-------------------- | ---------------------------
|                     | Garry L. Anselmo           
|                     | Principal Executive Officer

---
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2227 

For the relief of Paul Green. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Paul Green. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPLICATION 

4 FOR CHILD’S INSURANCE BENEFIT AND 

5 LUMP-SUM DEATH BENEFIT UNDER TITLE II 

6 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT. 

7 If an application for a child’s insurance benefit under 

8 section 202(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(d)) is filed by or on behalf of Paul Green of Walnut 

10 Street in Newton, Massachusetts, during the 1-year period 

11 following the date of the enactment of this Act— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2227 IH

1 (1) the application shall be deemed, for pur2 poses of section 202(d) of such Act, to have been 

3 filed during the month in which his mother, Marie 

4 Pendola Grardina (social security account number 

5 000-00-2579), died; and 

6 (2) the application shall be deemed to be an ap7 plication for a lump-sum death benefit under section 

8 202(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(i)), and for pur9 poses of such section 202(i), to have been filed in 

10 the month during which his mother, Marie Pendola 

11 Grardina, died. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
SERVED: DECEMBER 28, 2011 

:^PARTMENTOF 

^riANSPORTATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION^:yrf'r^pp)^'i|-^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '"' '"'- ^''>' ''^'^^ 

WASHINGTON, DC ^^^. . ^ ^^ ^^ ^ 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NU FASHION BEAUTY SUPPLY DISTRIBUTORS 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-2011-1123 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201ICE700023) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

/ - ^ ' — " 

Ronnie A. Yodei^ 

Chief Administrative La.w-Juclge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-201 1-1123 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONECOPY 

Ms. Gaylc Chyu 

Nu Fashion Beauty Supply Distributors, Respondent 

1366 Kingsland Avenue 

St. Louis, MO 63133 

W. Bcavis Schock, Respondent's Counsel 

1111 Botiliomme Avenue, Suite 1300 

S(. Louis, MO 63105 

TEL; 314-721-1698 

FAX: 314-726-2322 

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainanl's Counsel 

Attorney, OlTice of Regional Counsel 

Centra! Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 --

TEL: 816-329-3766 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adwimsirative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attomev-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service vvas by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expediled courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                       5,000
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,181,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                               187,000
<INVENTORY>                                                145,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,146,000
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,425,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      397,000
<BONDS>                                                     84,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    61,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 883,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,425,000
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,844,000
<CGS>                                                    2,285,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         1,459,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            24,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           9,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             91,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         90,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                90,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.01
        
 

</TABLE>
§ 21.5132 Criteria used in determining benefit payments. ( a ) *Training time.* The amount of benefit payment to an individual in all types of training except cooperative training, correspondence training and apprenticeship and other on-job training depends on whether VA determines that the individual is a full-time student, three-quarter-time student, half-time student or one-quarter-time student. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3688; Pub. L. 99-576, Pub. L. 100-689)
( b ) *Contributions.* The amount of benefit payment to an individual also depends on: ( 1 ) The amount the individual has contributed to the fund.
( 2 ) The amount the Secretary of Defense has contributed to the fund for the individual.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3231)
[45 FR 31, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 51746, Nov. 17, 1982; 48 FR 3369, Jan. 25, 1983; 52 FR 3429, Feb. 4, 1987; 53 FR 34498, Sept. 7, 1988; 55 FR 31582, Aug. 3, 1990; 61 FR 29030, June 7, 1996]
#### *Peter Kline *against*Alexander Ramsay.

ON CERTIORARI.

THE counsel for the plaintiff relied principally on the uncertainty and insufficiency of the state of demand, the reversal of this judgment. The opinion delivered, contains so much of this, as is necessary to understand the force of the objection.

*Vroom*for plaintiff.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

The material part of the state of demand, filed in this cause, is this: viz.

*That the defendant did stop and prevent James F. Dumont, a, constable, from arresting by warrant, Joseph Fisher, who had in his possession, a horse belonging to the said plaintiff, which he, the said Joseph Fisher, had unlawfully taken from the inn of Matthias Oramer, after having swapt with the plaintiff; and received also,*27 *dollars boot, in cash and due bills for the same ; and said Kline, defendant, did assist the said Fisher, in making his escape with said horse, from the stable of Jacob Kline, esq. of Tewksbury, and prevented the constable from doing his duty, to my damage*100 *dollars.*

This state of demand is too uncertain. What sort of a warrant this was, whether in a civil or criminal case, when, by whom, and for what issued, what interest the plaintiff had in it, and *how*he was injured by its not being served, is not set forth.

The effect of this uncertainty too, is clearly seen by the subsequent proceedings; for the counsel for the defendant, whose discernment and accuracy is inferior to none of his standing at the bar, actually comes in and pleads for a nonsuit, upon the ground, that the conduct charged upon the defendant in the state of demand, is not of a civil, but of a criminal nature, and therefore is not the subject matter of trial before a justice. And even upon the trial, the warrant is not produced, so that the defendant is left to guess at the real state of demand, till the last.

The formalities of pleading, it is true, are dispensed *160with in these courts, but there must be certainty to a J cofiimon intent. *There must be so much certainty, at least, as that the defendant shall not be cheated out of his defence, by guessing wrong, when he guesses at the meaning of the complaint.

Let judgment, therefore be reversed.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report
of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ending August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

______________________Garry L.
Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer

January 21, 2009

---
1

From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) [SEIDELT@michigan.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:40 AM

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Subject: FW: chrome tests

Attachments: Perfection.pdf

 

From: Maza, Thomas (DNRE) 

Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:30 AM 

To: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) 

Subject: chrome tests

Teresa, 

When you asked for chrome tests I sent you my review - easy for me. Later I realized that most of the reports will be the 

ones sent by the source, and maybe that is what RTI really wants. The attached file is 1 such report. The other report is 

either in the Warren office, or more like sent to records center. If RTI wants another full report from SEMI please have 

them contact me. 

Tom 

Thomas Maza

(v) 313.456.4709

(f) 313.456.4692

 

Cadillac Place

3058 West Grand Boulevard

Suite 2-300

Detroit, Michigan 48202
#### § 19.32 Closing of appeal for failure to respond to Statement of the Case.

The agency of original jurisdiction may close the appeal without notice to an appellant or his or her representative for failure to respond to a Statement of the Case within the period allowed. However, if a Substantive Appeal is subsequently received within the 1-year appeal period (60-day appeal period for simultaneously contested claims), the appeal will be considered to be reactivated.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105(d)(3) (2016))

[57 FR 4104, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
#### § 18b.76 Service on amici curiae.

All briefs, exceptions, memoranda, requests, and decisions referred to in §§ 18b.70 through 18b.76 shall be served upon amici curiae at the same times and in the same manner required for service on parties. Any written statements of position and trial briefs required of parties under § 18b.50 shall be served on amici.
Statement of the Air and Radiat ion Management Administration Department of the Environment

for the Public Hearing Relating to Amendments to Regulation .15 Paint, Resin, and Adhesive Manufacturing and Adhesive Application under COMAR 26.11.19 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes held on January 21, 2010 Baltimore, MD

My name is Husain Waheed. I am a Senior Regulatory and Compliance Engineer with the Regulation Development Division of the Ai r and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the Environment.

This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102

and Sections 2-301 et.seq. of the Environment Article , Annotated Code of Maryland. It is also being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Act under the State Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101.

Notice of this hearing appeared in the:

Maryland Register on December 18, 2009; MDE's website from December 17, 2009 to January 21, 2010; Baltimore Sun on December 18, 2009; Saint Mary's Enterprise on December 18, 2009; Cumberland Times-News on December 18, 2009; Frederick News-Post on December 18, 2009; Salisbury Daily Times on December 18, 2009; and the Washington Post on December 17, 2009.

Copies of these notices were submitted for the record.

Copies of the proposed action and supporting documents were submitted for review to the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies were also made available for public inspection at th e Air and Radiation Management Administration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health departments or local air quality control offices.

The purpose of today's hearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment on proposed amendments to Regulation .15 under COMAR 26.11.19.

Summary

This action repeals the general emission standard for adhesives under COMAR 26.11.19.15C(4) and replaces it with the proposed source-specific Volatile Organic Compound Reasonably Available Control Technology emission limitation for the application of adhesives and sealants to specialty electronic systems and subsystems for defense and homeland security.

12 The limit is 25 pounds per day of VOC from adhesive and sealant application averaged over a monthly period.

Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)

This action will be submitted to the EPA for approval as part of the SIP.

Consideration of Comments

The Department will consider all comments before making a decision to adopt the

amendments.
PUBLIC LAW 107–145—FEB. 14, 2002 116 STAT. 19

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 970:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 148 (2002): Feb. 5, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 107–145

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 39 Tremont

Street, Paris Hill, Maine, as the ‘‘Horatio King Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HORATIO KING POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 39 Tremont Street, Paris Hill, Maine, shall be

known as the ‘‘Horatio King Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the Horatio King Post Office Building.

Approved February 14, 2002.

Feb. 14, 2002

[S. 970]
----

COUNCIL OPINION

of 14 February 2006

on the updated stability programme of Austria, 2005-2008

(2006/C 55/09)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Commission,

After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,

HAS DELIVERED THIS OPINION:

In view of the above assessment, the Council welcomes the ambitious structural adjustment planned over the programme period. However, the Council invites Austria to make sure that the programme's MTO is achieved by the end of the update period by further specifying and implementing the necessary measures that will support the budgetary consolidation planned for the two final years of the programme.

Comparison of key macroeconomic and budgetary projections

----

(1)OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1055/2005 (OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 1). The documents referred to in this text can be found at the following website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/main_en.htm

(2)  It provides all compulsory and most optional data prescribed by the latter. A minor gap is the missing calculation of tax burden in Table 2.

(3)  Details on long-term sustainability are provided in the technical assessment of the programme by the Commission services

(http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/main_en.htm).

(4)  Commission services' calculations on the basis of the information in the programme.

(5)  Commission services' autumn 2005 forecast projections for the deficit and debt ratios have been adjusted to be comparable with the projections in the stability programme by recalculating the ratios on the basis of the new GDP series.

(6)  Based on estimated potential growth of 1,9 %, 2,2 %, 2,2 % and 2,1 % respectively in the period 2004-2007.

Source:

Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2005 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations.

----