alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1266. STANLEY HAMILTON v. THE STATE.

Following a jury trial, Stanley Hamilton was convicted of aggravated assault.

He filed an untimely motion for new trial, which the trial court dismissed. Hamilton

then filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the court also dismissed. He

next followed a motion for out-of-time appeal, which the trial court granted, but

Hamilton failed to timely file either a motion for new trial or a notice of appeal within

30 days. He filed a second motion for out-of-time appeal, which the trial court also

granted. Hamilton then filed a motion for new trial within 30 days of the court

granting him an out-of-time appeal. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court

denied the motion for new trial on the merits on February 24, 2022. This appeal

ensued. Recent precedent from the Supreme Court, however, precludes us from

addressing the merits of this appeal.

Recently, the Supreme Court eliminated the out-of-time appeal procedure,

holding that a trial court is “without jurisdiction to decide [a] motion for out-of-time

appeal” on the merits because “there was and is no legal authority for motions for

out-of-time appeal in trial courts.” Cook v. State, ___ Ga. ___ (5) (slip op. at 82)

(Case No. S21A1270, decided March 15, 2022). Cook also concluded that this

holding applies to “all cases that are currently on direct review or otherwise not yet

final[,]” id., and directed that “pending and future motions for out-of-time appeals in

trial courtsshould be dismissed, and trial court ordersthat have decided such motions

on the merits . . . should be vacated if direct review of the case remains pending or if

the case is otherwise not final.” Id. at ___ (4) (slip op. at 80-81).

In light of Cook, Hamilton “had no right to file a motion for an out-of-time

April 26, 2022
appeal in the trial court; his remedy, if any, lies in habeas corpus.” Rutledge v. State,

___ Ga. ___, ___ (slip op. at 4) (Case No. S21A1036, decided March 15, 2022).

Accordingly, the trial court’s November 19, 2021 order granting Hamilton’s motion

for out-of-time appeal is hereby VACATED, and this case is hereby REMANDED

for the entry of an order dismissing Hamilton’s motion. Additionally, given that

Hamilton’s motion for out-of-time appeal was granted in this case, the trial court is

DIRECTED to vacate any subsequent rulings on filings that the court lacked

jurisdiction to decide without the granted out-of-time appeal, such asthe February 24,

2022 order denying Hamilton’s otherwise untimelymotion for new trial, and a March

11, 2022 order denying Hamilton’s motion for reconsideration of that order.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/26/2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Mintz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/David Mintz *
----------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 12, 2008


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJuly 22, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”)during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2023By: 
/s/ Vikas Gupta
Name: Vikas GuptaTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2023**
Skip Navigation LinksBLS News Release
    Washington, D.C. 20212
    DOL LogoBLS Home | 
		Programs & Surveys |
		Get Detailed Statistics |
		Glossary |
		What's New |
		Find It! In DOLLPC Home  OTHER AVAILABLE ECONOMIC NEWS RELEASES--Employment Situation--Commissioner's Statement on the Employment Situation--Consumer Price Index--Employment Cost Index--Producer Price Index--Productivity and Costs--Real Earnings--U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes


Productivity and Costs
Table of Contents

Productivity and Costs, Third Quarter 2004, Preliminary
Technical note
Table 1. Business sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, unit labor costs, and prices, seasonally adjusted
Table 2. Nonfarm business sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, unit labor costs, and prices, seasonally adjusted
Table 3. Manufacturing sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, and unit labor costs, seasonally adjusted
Table 4. Durable manufacturing sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, and unit labor costs, seasonally adjusted
Table 5. Nondurable manufacturing sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, and unit labor costs, seasonally adjusted
Table 6. Nonfinancial corporations: Productivity, hourly compensation, unit labor costs, unit profits, and prices, seasonally adjusted
Sources and footnotes for tables
Text version of entire news releaseThe PDF version of the news release
Supplemental Files Table of Contents**Last Modified Date:** November 04, 2004 
	

  Back to Top
      www.dol.govFrequently Asked Questions | 
Freedom of Information Act | 
Customer SurveyPrivacy & Security Statement | 
Linking to Our Site | 
Accessibility**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
		Office of Productivity and Technology
		Suite 2150
		2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE 
		Washington, DC 20212-0001
      URL: http://www.bls.gov/LPC
		Phone: (202) 691-5600 
		Fax: (202) 691-5664
		Quarterly productivity data questions: dprweb@bls.gov
		Industry productivity data questions: dipsweb@bls.gov
			Technical (web) questions: webmaster@bls.gov
			Other comments: feedback@bls.gov
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.92 Exhalation valve leakage test. ( a ) Dry exhalation valves and valve seats will be subjected to a suction of 25 mm. (1 inch) water-column height while in a normal operating position.
( b ) Leakage between the valve and the valve seat shall not exceed 30 milliliters per minute.
II 

Calendar No. 818 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2197 

[Report No. 110–386] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 23, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

JUNE 16, 2008 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National 

Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hopewell Culture Na5 tional Historical Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY EXPANSION. 

7 Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to rename and 

8 expand the boundaries of the Mound City Group National 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2197 RS

1 Monument in Ohio’’, approved May 27, 1992 (106 Stat. 

2 185), is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subsection 

4 (a)(3); 

5 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub6 section (a)(4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

7 (3) by adding after subsection (a)(4) the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(5) the map entitled ‘Hopewell Culture Na10 tional Historical Park, Ohio Proposed Boundary Ad11 justment’ numbered 353/80,049 and dated June, 

12 2006.’’; and 

13 (4) by adding after subsection (d)(2) the fol14 lowing new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may acquire lands added by 

16 subsection (a)(5) only from willing sellers.’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Calendar No. 818 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2197 

[Report No. 110

–386] 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture 

and for other purposes. National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, 

JUNE 16, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 16.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).
#### John Podmore, as Administrator, Etc., of Annie Podmore, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*The South Brooklyn Savings Institution, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

April, 1899.)

Action by administrator — When he need not give security for costs. Where an administrator sues in good faith and has a reasonable prospect of success, the fact that his estate is without assets is ■ not alone sufficient to compel him to give security for costs.

Motion for security for costs.

Arnold *&*Greene, for motion.

Hymes, Woytisek & Schaap, opposed.

*121Giegerich, J.

In view of the affidavits filed in support of the plaintiff’s proceedings in the Surrogate’s Court, I am inclined to believe that the action is prosecuted with a reasonable prospect of success; and that a substantial issue exists as to the validity of the payment made by defendant in recognition of the claim of a gift *causa mortis.*It appears that the plaintiff has brought the action in good faith, and, under the authorities, the fact that the estate is without assets is not alone sufficient to call for an order for security for costs. Rutherford v. Town of Madrid, 77 Hun, 545; Hale v. Mason, 86 id. 499; Brown v. Dean, 83 id. 613; Fagan v. Strong, 19 Civ. Pro. 88; 7 N. Y. Supp. 919; Sullivan v. McManus, N. Y. Law Jour., Nov. 1, 1894; Ridgway v. Symons, 14 Misc. Rep. 78; Cahn v. Sugenheimer, N. Y. Law Jour., April 4, 1899. For these reasons, the motion to compel the administrator to give security for costs is denied.

Motion denied.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 125]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ125.107]

Public Law 107-125
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To provide for work authorization for nonimmigrant spouses of 
intracompany transferees, and to reduce the period of time during which 
certain intracompany transferees have to be continuously employed before 
     applying for admission to the United States. <<NOTE: Jan. 16, 
                         2002 -  [H.R. 2278]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WORK AUTHORIZATION FOR SPOUSES OF INTRACOMPANY TRANSFEREES.

    Section 214(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(E) In the case of an alien spouse admitted under section 
101(a)(15)(L), who is accompanying or following to join a principal 
alien admitted under such section, the Attorney General shall authorize 
the alien spouse to engage in employment in the United States and 
provide the spouse with an `employment authorized' endorsement or other 
appropriate work permit.''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF REQUIRED PERIOD OF PRIOR CONTINUOUS EMPLOYMENT FOR 
            CERTAIN INTRACOMPANY TRANSFEREES.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(c)(2)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(2)(A)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
``In the case of an alien seeking admission under section 101(a)(15)(L), 
the 1-year period of continuous employment required under such section 
is deemed to be reduced to a 6-month period if the importing employer 
has filed a blanket petition under this subparagraph and met the 
requirements for expedited processing of aliens covered under such 
petition.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(L)) is amended by striking 
``an alien who,'' and inserting ``subject to section 214(c)(2), an alien 
who,''.

    Approved January 16, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2278:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-188 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Sept. 5, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1770 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 40 ) XII-A-3 8 Docket Number: 

# A-79-1 5

Printed 107287200810:20:29AM Sheet 40of 93P. 2 

# (3) Docke t No . A-79-1 5 Ite mNo . XII-A-3 8
Unite dState s Environmental Protectio n Agenc y Offic e Of Ai r Qualit y Plannin g An dStandard s Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 EPA-453/R-01-00 3 Januar y 200 1 Air 

# c/EP A 

# National-Scal e Ai r Toxics Assessmentfor 1996

NOTE : THI S DOCUMEN T I S A PRELIMINAR Y DRAFT . I t ha s no t bee n formall y release db y th e U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y an dshoul dnot a t thi s stag e b e construe dt o represen t Agenc y polic y o r

factua l conclusions . Thi s documen t i s bein g provide dno w fo r revie w t o EPA' s Scienc e Advisor y Board . I t

shoul dno t

b e cite do r

referre dt o a s EPA' s final National-Scal e Ai r

Toxic s Assessment .

Thi s documen t

i s availabl e a

t http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/sab/natareport.pd f

# 3\AJ3r > 

### EPA-453/R-01-00 3



## National-Scale Air Toxic

s Assessmen

tfo r 199 6

EP A Offic e o

f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an dStandard s DRAF T fo r

EP A Scienc e Advisor y Boar dReview : Januar y 18,200 1



# A P. 3 •
§ 0.735-11 Other conduct on the job. *Relationship with beneficiaries and claimants.* Employees are expected to be helpful to beneficiaries, patients and claimants, but: ( a ) An employee shall not procure intoxicants or drugs for, or attempt to sell intoxicants or drugs to, patients or members, or give or attempt to give intoxicants or drugs to them unless officially prescribed for medical use;
( b ) An employee shall not abuse patients, members, or other beneficiaries, whether or not provoked.
#### § 17.164 Patient responsibility in making and keeping dental appointments.

Any veteran eligible for dental treatment on a one-time completion basis only and who has not received such treatment within 3 years after filing the application shall be presumed to have abandoned the claim for dental treatment.

[45 FR 6939, Jan. 31, 1980. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM TOFUTTI
BRANDS  INC.'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.

<ARTICLE>                     5




<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                     995,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,471,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               158,000
<INVENTORY>                                579,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,161,000
<PP&E>                                      59,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              59,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,460,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      661,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    63,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,717,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,460,000
<SALES>                                  6,074,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         6,074,000
<CGS>                                    3,917,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,917,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,420,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            735,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               294,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        441,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               441,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .06



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
  ****Date: November 5, 2004
By:
/s/ Colin DunnColin Dunn, Vice President of Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE NINE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                56,392,945
<SECURITIES>                                           1,044,957
<RECEIVABLES>                                         24,893,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                             688,000
<INVENTORY>                                           23,826,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     106,332,226
<PP&E>                                                72,553,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                        34,854,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       155,013,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 24,337,241
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                               1,058,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                           128,811,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         155,013,038
<SALES>                                              101,415,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     101,415,534
<CGS>                                                 62,392,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         79,413,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       24,951,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                           3,736,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   21,215,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          21,215,452
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.94



</TABLE>