alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ForeignBuyers Lists

----

| PLEASE NOTE        !! | These lists are        available for distribution         only in the United States. |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

This serviceoffers information on more than 20,000 foreign buyers of food,natural fiber, and wood products in 80 countries. Foreign BuyerLists provide important information on each firm such as contactperson, address, telephone, FAX, and type of product(s) imported.

Foreign BuyerLists are available in either of two formats:-

> 
**By    commodity** - all known buyers of a specific commodity    worldwide, sorted by country;

> 
**By    country** - all known buyers of various agricultural and    food products in a specific country, sorted by product. 

**How toOrder:**

To order, selectthe *product* or *country* list(s) you want from the Foreign Buyer Productor Foreign Buyer Countryindex. Then legibly printor type the code and description for each *product*or *country*list in the space provided on the second page of the form.

Mail or fax thecompleted form to: 

| **AgExport Connections********Ag        Box 1052        AGX/FAS/USDA        Washington, DC 20250-1052** | **Phone: (202) 690-3416        Fax: (202) 690-4374** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|

**NOTE:** Thereis a $15 service fee for each Foreign Buyers List.

Payment may bemade by check, money order, bank draft, or credit card and ***mustbe included with the order form***. Orders may besubmitted by FAX only if payment is made by credit card. No CODor invoice orders will be accepted. All checks, money orders,etc. should be made payable to **FAS-USDA.** Do **not**send cash.

Orders areprocessed within three working days of receipt. The printedForeign Buyer Lists are sent by First Class mail. Lists can alsobe shipped by Federal Express and charged to your FEDEX accountor credit card. Please note that we **DO NOT** fax any ForeignBuyer Lists.

Orderform (Download in .wp format, .pcx format, .pdf format)

***NOTE:****These lists are available for distribution only in the UnitedStates.*

|                                        |
|---------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Thursday, October 22, 1998* |
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 19, 2015 519606 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of

ARLENE K. PARRIS,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 20, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Arlene K. Parris, Houston, Texas, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary

Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed December 10, 2013, which ruled that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.
-2- 519606 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
§ 13.260 Personal funds of patients. ( a ) *Distribution of funds.* Benefits deposited by VA in the personal funds of patients account for a veteran who was rated by VA as being unable to manage his or her VA benefits and who died leaving an account balance are payable to an eligible person. For purposes of this section, *eligible person* means an individual living at the time the account balance is distributed in the following order of preference: ( 1 ) The deceased veteran's spouse, as defined by § 3.1000(d)(1) of this chapter;
( 2 ) The veteran's children (in equal shares), as defined by § 3.57 of this chapter, but without regard to age or marital status; or
( 3 ) The veteran's dependent parents (in equal shares) or surviving parent, as defined by § 3.59 of this chapter, provided that the parents were or parent was dependent within the meaning of § 3.250 of this chapter on the date of the veteran's death.
( 4 ) Any balance remaining in the personal funds of patients account that cannot be distributed in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section will be used by VA to reimburse anyone who bore the expense of the veteran's last sickness or burial or will be deposited to the credit of the applicable current VA appropriation.
( b ) *Application.* A person who seeks distribution of a deceased veteran's funds from the personal funds of patients account under paragraph (a) of this section must file an application with VA not later than 5 years after the veteran's death. If any person who seeks such distribution is under a legal disability that prevents him or her from filing an application at the time of the veteran's death, the 5-year period will run from the date of termination or removal of the legal disability.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5502)
§ 17.90 Medical care for veterans receiving vocational training under 38 U.S.C. chapter 15. Hospital care, nursing home care and medical services may be provided to any veteran who is participating in a vocational training program under 38 U.S.C. chapter 15. ( a ) For purposes of determining eligibility for this medical benefit, the term *participating in a vocational training program under 38 U.S.C. chapter 15* means the same as the term *participating in a rehabilitation program under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31* as defined in § 17.47(i). Eligibility for such medical care will continue only while the veteran is participating in the vocational training program.
( b ) The term *hospital care and medical services* means class V dental care, priority III medical services, nursing home care and non-VA hospital care and/or fee medical/dental care if VA is unable to provide the required medical care economically at VA or other government facilities because of geographic inaccessibility or because of the unavailability of the required services at VA facilities.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1524, 1525, 1516)
[51 FR 19330, May 29, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 3422, Jan. 30, 1991. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21965, 21967, May 13, 1996; 79 FR 54615, Sept. 12, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.304 Capacity test requirements.

(a) NIOSH will conduct the capacity test on a total of 8 to 10 of the units submitted for approval, as follows:

(1) Three units will be tested on a breathing and metabolic simulator in the condition in which they are received from the applicant;

(2) Two units will be tested on a breathing and metabolic simulator after being subjected to the environmental treatments specified in [§ 84.307 of this subpart](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/part-84/section-84.307);

(3) Two units will be tested on a breathing and metabolic simulator at the cold-temperature limit recommended by the manufacturer under [§ 84.302(h)(1)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.302#p-84.302(h)(1)), after the unit has been stored for a minimum of 24 hours at this limit; and

(4) One unit, in the condition in which it is received from the applicant, will be tested by a human subject on a treadmill.

(5) To approve a CCER for use in coal mines, two units will also be tested by a human subject under the specifications of [§§ 84.99](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.99) and [84.100](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.100) that are applicable to man test 4.

(b) The capacity test will begin upon the first inhalation from or exhalation into the unit.

(c) Each unit will be tested at a constant work rate, depending on the capacity value specified by the manufacturer, according to the requirements specified in Table 2. All volumes are given at standard temperature (0 C) and pressure (760 mm Hg), dry, unless otherwise noted.

(d) NIOSH will rate an approved CCER using the appropriate capacity rating, as specified in Table 2.

Table 2—Capacity Test Requirements

| Capacity rating | Capacity (L of O2) | VO2 (L/min) | VCO2 (L/min) | Ve (L/min) | RF (Breaths/min) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cap 1 | 20 ≤L ≤59 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 55 | 22 |
| Cap 2 | 60 ≤L ≤79 | 2.00 | 1.80 | 44 | 20 |
| Cap 3 | L ≥80 | 1.35 | 1.15 | 30 | 18 |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VO2 = volume of oxygen consumed per minute; VCO2 = volume of carbon dioxide produced per minute. | | | | | |
| Ve = ventilation rate in liters of air per minute; RF = respiratory frequency. | | | | | |

(e) NIOSH will document the least value achieved by the seven units tested using the breathing and metabolic simulator. NIOSH will quantify this value of achieved capacity within an increment of 5 liters, rounding intermediate values to the nearest lower 5-liter increment.
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 22 December 2004         

appointing a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/18/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Juan Carlos MARTÍN MALLÉN, Director General de Asuntos Europeos y Acción Exterior — Diputación General de Aragón, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Alain CUENCA GARCÍA for the remainder of his term of office, ending on 25 January 2006.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

C. VEERMAN            

----

(1)OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

----
#### Baumgardner Trust

*Roberts R. Appel*and *Charles Foltz Herr,*for ex-ceptants.

March 5, 1956.

Bowman, P. J.,

The exceptions which were filed by the accountant, the Fulton National Bank of Lancaster, substituted trustee, and the Lancaster Cemetery to the adjudication of April 28, 1955, are to our refusal to permit the accountant to resign as trustee of the trust created under the will of Florine Baumgardner for the maintenance of burial lots in the Lancaster Cemetery and to award the balance as shown in the account to the Cemetery Company which seeks appointment as succeeding trustee.

*220Testatrix, who died April 18, 1931, provided in her will as follows:

> “EIGHTH: I give and bequeath the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1000) unto The Lancaster Trust Company, of Lancaster, Pa., in Trust, the same to be safely invested and the net income derived therefrom shall be expended for the perpetual care and upkeep of the Baumgardner burial lots in Lancaster Cemetery, and of the gravestones erected thereon.”

The account here involved is one of 42 accounts of trusts for the maintenance of cemetery lots in The Lancaster Cemetery filed by this trustee and other corporate trustees. All such accounts were filed to afford the respective trustees an opportunity to present their petitioners to resign and to permit the appointment of The Lancaster Cemetery as succeeding trustee and, subsequently, if that appointment is made, to enable the succeeding trustee to combine and merge the funds and transfer the same to a corporate trustee for investment purposes, all under the provisions of the Act of August 10, 1951, P. L. 1199, 15 PS §§1101-02, and of the Act of June 12,1951, P. L. 520,15 PS §2851-315. It is anticipated that an increase in income would result, thus making it possible to more effectively carry out the purposes for which the trust was created.

What we said in our opinion filed concurrently herewith in Baer Trust, 6 D. & C. 2d 215, concerning the difficulties involved in numerous small cemetery trusts certainly is not applicable to this trust. The balance shown by the account includes the principal of $1,000 and accumulated income of $233.12. The fund produces an annual gross income of $30, and during the years 1952 to 1953 the annual charge for the maintenance of the lot was $25. Unlike the trust created under the will of Sarah A. Baer, supra, or those small trusts involved in Sixty Cemetery Trusts, 5 Fiduc. Rep. 505, no problem is here presented of the *221fund producing inadequate income to carry out the purposes of testatrix or of the trust. We can find no good reason, therefore, why we should permit the present trustee to resign and award the fund to a succeeding trustee to be subsequently transferred to a corporate trustee for investment purposes.
#### § 19.20 What constitutes an appeal.

An appeal consists of a timely filed Notice of Disagreement submitted in accordance with the provisions of § 19.21, and either § 19.52(a) or § 20.501(a) of this chapter, as applicable and, after a Statement of the Case has been furnished, a timely filed Substantive Appeal.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105 (2016))

[79 FR 57698, Sept. 25, 2014. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 177, 178, Jan. 18, 2019]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129654 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129654 

 COA: 252505 
 Wayne CC: 03-005631-01 

DEMETRIUS DARNELL MCBRIDE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
#### § 21.5135 Advance payments.

VA will apply the provisions of § 21.4138(a) in making advance payments to veterans and servicemembers.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3680)

[64 FR 52652, Sept. 30, 1999]
#### Clover Farms, Inc. *v.*W. G. Kielwasser Clover Farms, Inc. *v.*W. G. Kielwasser

(2999)

(3000)

Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued May 4

decided May 19, 1948

*D. Harold Cotter,*for the plaintiff.

*Charles G. Alhom,*with whom was *Nelson Harris,*for the defendant.

Per Curiam.

In each of these cases the Court of Common Pleas rendered a summary judgment for the plaintiff on December 17, 1947; on December 30, 1947, the defendant filed an appeal; and on January 5, 1948, the trial court, on motion of the plaintiff, opened the judgment. The ground of the motion to erase is that there is now no final judgment in effect from which an appeal would lie. The defendant does not question that the motion to erase is the proper procedure to present the matter, nor does he contend that it should not be granted. His claim is that the erasure of the case from the docket should be *623conditioned upon the payment to him of the costs and expenses incurred by him in taking the appeal. As in the case of the Superior Court, there is but one term of the Court of Common Pleas held annually in each county beginning in September. General Statutes, Sup. 1941, § 761f. The trial court had authority to open the judgment when it did, and the fact that an appeal had been filed did not prevent such action. *Thompson*v. *Towle,*98 Conn. 738, 741, 120 A. 503. Whether it should do so or not rested in its discretion. *Kaiser*v. *Second National Bank of New Haven,*123 Conn. 248, 255, 193 A. 761. It might, if justice required, have conditioned the granting of the motion upon the payment to the defendant of costs and expenses properly incurred in taking the appeal before the motion to open was made. Because in such a situation the trial court is familiar with or can ascertain the facts relevant to the justice of imposing such a condition, it is the proper tribunal to pass on the matter. As the term of court still continues, it is not too late for it in this case to revoke its order and make a new order upon such a condition, if the circumstances justify it.

The motion to erase is granted.
#### Henry E. Bowers, Respondent, *v.*Samuel Stewart, Appellant.

■ Appeal- from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

John H. Rogan, for appellant.

Putney & Bishop, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We have examined the case and points submitted, and do not find any error committed.

We, therefore, think the judgment should be affirmed,' with costs.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J.; McCarthy and Hascall, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
GROUP,INC.4717HammersleyRoad,Madison,WI53711P:800.532.7820P:608.271.2233F:608.270.3362March31,2014KathleenB.Hogan,DeputyAssistantSecretaryforEnergyEfficiency,EnergyEfficiencyandRenewableEnergyU.S.DepartmentofEnergy1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585DearSecretaryHogan:SubZerorespectfullyrequestsanaddendumtothewaivergrantedusonFebruary6,2012(CaseRF-020)toaddadditionalbasicmodels.InouroriginalpetitiondatedSeptember6,2011,weincludedallSubZeromodelsusingdualcompressorsthatwereanticipatedatthetime.Sincethen,wehavebegundevelopmentofadditionalmodelsthatrequiretheenergytestprocedureapprovedinDOE’swaiver.Allotheraspectsofthepetitionandwaiverremainunchanged.Thenewmodelsare:BI-42UFD/OBI-42UFD/S/PHBI-42UFD/S/THSub-ZerowouldbepleasedtodiscussthisaddendumwithDOEstaffandprovideanyadditionalinformationthattheDepartmentmightrequire.Sincerely,PaulV.SikirVicePresidentofDesignEngineeringViaemail:AS_WaiverReguests(ee.doe.govSUB*ZEROWOLF
#### § 21.376 Travel expenses for initial evaluation and counseling.

When VA asks a disabled veteran to report to a designated place for an initial evaluation, reevaluation or counseling (including personal or vocational adjustment counseling), the veteran will travel to and from the place of evaluation and counseling at government expense. When a veteran, because of a severe disability, requires the services of an attendant while traveling, VA will authorize payment of travel expenses for the attendant under the provisions of § 21.374.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 111)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL
     FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND
     THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                  14,775,437
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           20,538,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                               317,000
<INVENTORY>                                             23,735,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        59,773,578
<PP&E>                                                  63,937,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                          28,279,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         108,693,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   13,634,690
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                   523,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                              93,428,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           108,693,732
<SALES>                                                 30,758,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        30,758,768
<CGS>                                                   20,314,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           25,119,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          5,791,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                               670,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      5,121,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                             5,121,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .95

        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32**

**Section      1350 Certifications**

| Dated:                November 13, 2006 |                                   |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                   |
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/ Roger                E. Girard |
|                                    | ROGER                E. GIRARD         |
|                                    | CHIEF                EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|                                    |                                   |                                    |
| Dated:                November 13, 2006 |                                   |
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/                Jonathan R. Hunt     |
|                                    | JONATHAN R. HUNT                       |
|                                    | CHIEF                FINANCIAL OFFICER |

----
#### LANCASTER V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 9, 1912.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Frank Cahalan.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Briokell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

Affirmed on the record.
#### § 16.112 Review by Institution

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.