alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-00-0591-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 25, 2001

______________________________

IN RE: JOSE E. QUINTANA

_________________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Relator Jose E. Quintana seeks a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, the

Honorable Samuel Kiser, allegedly the Judge of the 181st District Court of Randall County,

to hear and rule on certain motions filed by relator. We deny the application.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 2, 2001, relator filed with the clerk of this court a pleading entitled

Petition for Writ of Mandamus. In the petition, he alleges that he has filed several motions

in Cause No. 8787-B in the 181st District Court of Randall County (the trial court), which

is styled The State of Texas v. Jose E. Quintana. He further alleges that the motions have

not been heard or ruled on by respondent. We are requested to direct respondent to hear

and rule on the motions. 
2

In support of his application for writ of mandamus, relator has not attached or

furnished any copies of the motions he allegedly has filed, any proof that respondent has

been requested to hear the motions, or other document or record of proceedings. 

LAW

When application for writ of mandamus is made, it is the relator’s burden to show

entitlement to the relief being requested. See generally Johnson v. Fourth District Court

of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding). Relator must file with the

petition a certified sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for

relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding, and a properly authenticated

transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding including any exhibits

offered in evidence or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the

matter complained of. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a).

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus contains only allegations. Certified, sworn

copies of the motions he alleges were filed in the trial court proceeding are not included

with the petition, nor is any other document or transcript. 

Relator has not presented a record which shows entitlement to the relief sought, or

upon which we are authorized to act.
3

Accordingly, relator’s application for writ of mandamus is denied.

Phil Johnson

 Justice

Do not publish.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2308 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2308

 To repeal the amendment made by section 796 of the Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
     Appropriations Act, 2006, exempting from harboring sanctions 
 compensation for alien volunteers for certain religious organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2007

 Mr. Tancredo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the amendment made by section 796 of the Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
     Appropriations Act, 2006, exempting from harboring sanctions 
 compensation for alien volunteers for certain religious organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF IMMIGRATION HARBORING EXCEPTION FOR COMPENSATION 
              OF ALIEN VOLUNTEERS BY CERTAIN BONA FIDE, NONPROFIT 
              RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.

    Section 274(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324(a)(1)) is amended by striking subparagraph (C), as added by 
section 796 of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public 
Law 109-97).
                                 <all>
```
§ 203.9 Administrative appeals. ( a ) *Requirements for making an appeal.* A requester may appeal any adverse determination to the Register of Copyrights. Examples of adverse determinations are provided in § 203.8(e). Requesters can submit appeals by mail to the Register of Copyrights, Copyright Office, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024. The requester must make the appeal in writing and to be considered timely it must be postmarked within 90 calendar days after the date of the Office's response. The appeal should clearly identify the agency determination that is being appealed, include the assigned docket number, and include a statement explaining the basis for the appeal. To facilitate handling, the requester should include on both the appeal letter and envelope “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* ( 1 ) The Register of Copyrights or a designee will adjudicate all appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( c ) *Decisions on appeals.* The Office shall provide its decision on an appeal in writing. A decision that upholds the Office's determination in whole or in part will contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision will provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform the requester of the mediation services offered by the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If the Office's decision is remanded or modified on appeal, the Agency will notify the requester of that determination in writing. The Office will then further process the request in accordance with the appeal determination and will respond directly to the requester.
( d ) *Engaging in dispute resolution.* Mediation is a voluntary process. If the Office agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
( e ) *When an appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of an agency's adverse determination, a requester must first submit a timely administrative appeal.
[82 FR 9508, Feb. 7, 2017]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 69 0 . RECO COUSI NS v . TERRY LANGLEY et a l

.

Reco Co us i n s fi l ed t h i s p ro s e ci v i l act i o n ag a i n s t T e rry Lan gl ey an d o t h er d efen d an t s , as s ert i n g t h at h e was m i s t reat ed wh i l e b ei n g h el d i n t h e Carro l l Co u n t y
J ai l

. Co u s i n s was i n carcerat ed at Ri v erb en d Co rrect i on al Faci l i t y wh en h e fi l ed t h e

act i on

. Th e t ri al co u rt d i s m i s s ed t he act i o n , an d Co u s i n s fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap peal

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Un d er t h e Pri s o n L i t i g at i o n Refo rm Ac t o f 1 99 6
, an ap p eal in a ci v i l act i o n fi led b y a p ri s o ner m

us t b e i n it i at ed b y fi l i n g an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary rev i ew. See OCGA § 4 2 -1 2 -8
, cro s s -referen ci n g OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 ; Br o ck v. Ha r d m a n , 3 0 3 Ga.

7 2 9
, 7 3 1 (2 ) (8 1 4 SE2 d 7 3 6 ) (2 0 1 8 )

. “ C o m p l i an ce wi t h th e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s

p ro ced ure i s ju ri s di ct i o n al

. ” S mo a k v. Dep t

. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 21 G a. Ap p

. 2 5 7,

2 5 7 (4 7 1 SE2 d 6 0 ) (1 9 9 6 ). Becau s e Co u s i n s was i ncarcerat ed w h en h e fi l ed t h i s ci v i l

act i on , h i s fai l ure to co m

p l y wi t h t h e d is cret i o n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f

1 In t h e n o t i ce o f ap p eal , Co u s i n s g av e Ri v erb en d as h is ad d res s

. December 30, 2021ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is d irect ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Br o ck

, 3 0 3 Ga.

at 7 3 1 (2 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/30/2021
The actual amount of the bonuses paid to its executive officers, including the CEO, variesdepending upon the Company’s performance (which is 80% of the total bonus) and, for executiveofficers other than the CEO, such executive officers’ individual performance (which is 20% of thetotal bonus). In 2007, the Committee set the corporate component at 150% for the CEO and 120% forall other executive officers. The individual component of the annual cash bonus is based on theexecutive officer’s individual performance rating, determined in the manner discussed above. For2007, the individual performance component of the annual cash bonus was set between approximately80% and 130% for executive officers who received one of the top three performance ratings.     The bonus targets for the NEOs are either set in accordance with their employment agreementsor are based upon their respective grade levels. The 2008 bonus targets (which represents apercentage of base salary) for the NEOs are as follows:     **Name** **Target**Colin Goddard, Ph.D.  100%Michael G. Atieh  50%Gabriel Leung  50%Anker Lundemose, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.  50%Robert L. Simon  50%*Equity Awards*     OSI grants equity awards to our executive officers, including our NEOs, under our Amended andRestated Stock Incentive Plan. Our practice is to grant equity awards at the end of the yearfollowing our annual performance review; there is no relationship between the timing of our equitygrants and the release of non-public material information. Equity grants to the NEOS are designedto provide a level of equity compensation that is at the approximate 50th percentile of thatawarded by OSI’s peer group of companies. For 2007, individual equity grants for our NEOs weremade within a range of plus or minus 20% of the targeted award level based on each NEOs’ individualperformance rating. Following our review of market practices, we determined to make equity awardsfor 2007 as a mix of stock options and restricted stock units with 50% in the form of stock optionsand 50% in the form of restricted stock units. The value of the 2007 option and restricted stockunit awards granted to the CEO represented values at approximately the 60th percentileof the market data reviewed in 2007.*Perquisites*     We provide very few perquisites to our executive officers. Certain of our named executiveofficers receive reimbursement of relocation and temporary housing expenses, car allowances, 401Kplan match and retirement plan contributions, legal services related to preparation of anemployment agreement, home security systems, tax services and telephone expenses.
§ 1.969 Revision of waiver decisions. ( a ) *Jurisdiction.* A decision involving waiver may be reversed or modified on the basis of new and material evidence, fraud, a change in law or interpretation of law specifically stated in a Department of Veterans Affairs issue, or clear and unmistakable error shown by the evidence in file at the time the prior decision was rendered by the same or any other regional office Committee.
( b ) *Finality of decisions.* Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, a decision involving waiver rendered by the Committee having jurisdiction is final, subject to the provisions of: ( 1 ) Sections 3.104(a), 19.153 and 19.154 of this chapter as to finality of decisions;
( 2 ) Section 3.105 (a) and (b) of this chapter as to revision of decisions, except that the Central Office staff may postaudit or make an administrative review of any decision of a regional office Committee;
( 3 ) Sections 3.103, 19.113 and 19.114 of this chapter as to notice of disagreement and the right of appeal;
( 4 ) Section 19.124 of this chapter as to the filing of administrative appeals and the time limits for filing such appeals.
( c ) *Difference of opinion.* Where reversal or amendment of a decision involving waiver is authorized under § 3.105(b) of this chapter because of a difference of opinion, the effective date of waiver will be governed by the principle contained in § 3.400(h) of this chapter.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[44 FR 59907, Oct. 17, 1979]
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Martin Cohen, Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Martin CohenName: Martin Cohen
Title: Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 3, 2003
§ 21.5250 Courses. ( a ) In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 32, VA and, where appropriate, the State approving agencies shall apply the following sections. ( 1 ) Section 21.4250 (except paragraph (c)(1))—Course and licensing and certification test approval; jurisdiction and notices.
( 2 ) Section 21.4251—Minimum period of operation requirement for educational institutions.
( 3 ) Section 21.4252—Courses precluded; erroneous, deceptive, or misleading practices.
( 4 ) Section 21.4253—Accredited courses.
( 5 ) Section 21.4254—Nonaccredited courses.
( 6 ) Section 21.4255—Refund policy; nonaccredited courses.
( 7 ) Section 21.4256—Correspondence programs and courses.
( 8 ) Section 21.4257—Cooperative courses.
( 9 ) Section 21.4258—Notice of approval.
( 10 ) Section 21.4259—Suspension or disapproval.
( 11 ) Section 21.4260—Courses in foreign countries.
( 12 ) Section 21.4261—Apprentice courses.
( 13 ) Section 21.4262—Other training on-the-job courses.
( 14 ) Section 21.4265—Practical training approved as institutional training or on-job training.
( 15 ) Section 21.4266—Courses offered at subsidiary branches or extensions.
( 16 ) Section 21.4267—Approval of independent study.
( 17 ) Section 21.4268—Approval of licensing and certification tests. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241, 3473, 3476, 3672, 3675, 3676, 3678, 3679, 3686, 3689)
( b ) *Flight courses.* In administering benefits payable for flight training under chapter 32, title 38, U.S.C., VA and the State approving agencies will apply the provisions of § 21.4263 of this part. Educational assistance allowance is payable only for flight training undertaken by a veteran or serviceperson after March 31, 1991.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241; Pub. L. 102-16)(Apr. 1, 1991)
[58 FR 31911, June 7, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 1526, Jan. 22, 1996; 61 FR 7218, Feb. 27, 1996; 72 FR 16979, Apr. 5, 2007]
§ 17.4015 Designated VA medical service lines. ( a ) VA may identify VA medical service lines that are underperforming based on the timeliness of care when compared with the same medical service line at other VA facilities and based on data related to two or more distinct and appropriate quality measures of VA's standards for quality when compared with non-VA medical service lines.
( b ) VA will make determinations regarding VA medical service lines under this section using data described in paragraph (a) of this section, VA standards for quality, and based on factors identified in paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) VA will announce annually any VA medical service lines identified under paragraph (a) of this section by publishing a document in the Federal Register. Such document will identify and describe the standards for quality VA used to inform the determination under paragraph (a), as well as how the data described in paragraph (a) and factors identified in paragraph (e) of this section were used to make the determinations. Such document will also identify limitations, if any, concerning when and where covered veterans can receive qualifying care and services at their election in the community based on this section. Such limitations may include a defined timeframe, a defined geographic area, and a defined scope of services. VA will also take reasonable steps to provide direct notice to covered veterans affected under this section.
( d ) VA will identify no more than 3 VA medical services lines in a single VA facility under this section, and no more than 36 VA medical service lines nationally under this section.
( e ) In determining whether a VA medical service line should be identified under paragraph (a) of this section, and to comply with paragraph (c) of this section, VA will consider: ( 1 ) Whether the differences between performance of individual VA medical service lines, and between performance of VA medical service lines and non-VA medical service lines, is clinically significant.
( 2 ) Likelihood and ease of remediation of the VA medical service line within a short timeframe.
( 3 ) Recent trends concerning the VA medical service line or non-VA medical service line.
( 4 ) The number of covered veterans served by the medical service line or that could be affected by the designation.
( 5 ) The potential impact on patient outcomes.
( 6 ) The effect that designating one VA medical service line would have on other VA medical service lines.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.313 Claims based on service in Vietnam. ( a ) *Service in Vietnam. Service in Vietnam* includes service in the waters offshore, or service in other locations if the conditions of service involved duty or visitation in Vietnam.
( b ) *Service connection based on service in Vietnam.* Service in Vietnam during the Vietnam Era together with the development of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma manifested subsequent to such service is sufficient to establish service connection for that disease.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
[55 FR 43124, Oct. 26, 1990]
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2021-1 Servicing Supplement dated as of January 5, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2021-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.123


 


 


Gary J. Skoien


Chairman, President, and


Chief Executive Officer


 


 


September 17, 2003


 


 


Mr. Tom Rumptz


Horizon Group Properties, Inc.


5000 Hakes Drive


Muskegon, MI   49441


 


Dear Tom:


 


This letter
amends your initial retention letter of 1999 and all subsequent letters.


 


The “Severance
Benefits” identified in Section 3 on Page 2 shall be ten (10) months both for
salary and COBRA.  The “Term of this
Agreement” on Page 2, Section 4 shall be changed to December 31, 2004.


 


Please feel
free to call me with any comments or questions you may have.  Thank you for your hard work and continued
contribution on behalf of Horizon Group Properties, Inc.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly
  yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Gary J.
  Skoien

  



 


1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000730349
<NAME>                        Tofutti Brands Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                            19,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,606,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     337,000
<INVENTORY>                                      430,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,728,000
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,115,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            807,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          61,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,190,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,115,000
<SALES>                                        3,537,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,537,000
<CGS>                                          2,304,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,316,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,012,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  216,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              216,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     216,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .04
        


</TABLE>