alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Bell YAGER, Appellant, v. Luther THOMAS, Warden, Appellee.

No. 15230.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 13, 1963.

James Bell Yager, in pro. per.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen. of Ky., John B. Browning, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Kentucky, Frankfort, Ky., for respondent-appellee.

Before WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and PECK, District Judge.

ORDER.

The within cause involves the appeal of James Bell Yager from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Petitioner, a prisoner in the Kentucky State Penitentiary at Eddyville, Kentucky, sought, by his petition for habeas corpus, an order directing Kentucky prison authorities to bring him before a Federal Grand Jury so he could give evidence of his knowledge of some undefined claims of violation of the tax laws of the United States by undisclosed persons. No Grand Jury has been convened to consider the subject of this petitioner’s claimed knowledge. The appeal to this Court is without merit and completely frivolous.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: May 7, 2004

                                        By: /s/ Daniel Bernstein
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Daniel Bernstein, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 35970, July 3, 1997; 62 FR 47532, Sept. 9, 1997; and 67 FR 46868, July 17, 2002.

§ 3.20 Surviving spouse's benefit for month of veteran's death. ( a ) Where the veteran died on or after December 1, 1962, and before October 1, 1982, the rate of death pension or dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable for the surviving spouse for the month in which the death occurred shall be not less than the amount of pension or compensation which would have been payable to or for the veteran for that month but for his or her death. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5310)
( b ) Where the veteran dies on or after October 1, 1982, the surviving spouse may be paid death pension or dependency and indemnity compensation for the month in which the veteran died at a rate equal to the amount of compensation or pension which would have been payable to the veteran for that month had death not occurred, but only if such rate is equal to or greater than the monthly rate of death pension or dependency and indemnity compensation to which the surviving spouse is entitled. Otherwise, no payment of death pension or dependency and indemnity compensation may be made for the month in which the veteran died. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5111(c))
( c ) ( 1 ) Where a veteran receiving compensation or pension dies after December 31, 1996, the surviving spouse, if not entitled to death compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, or death pension for the month of death, shall be entitled to a benefit for that month in an amount equal to the amount of compensation or pension the veteran would have received for that month but for his or her death.
( 2 ) A payment issued to a deceased veteran as compensation or pension for the month in which death occurred shall be treated as payable to that veteran's surviving spouse, if the surviving spouse is not entitled to death compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation or death pension for that month and, if negotiated or deposited, shall be considered to be the benefit to which the surviving spouse is entitled under paragraph (c)(1) of this section. However, if such payment is in an amount less than the amount of the benefit under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the unpaid difference shall be treated in the same manner as an accrued benefit under § 3.1000 of this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5310(b))
[48 FR 34471, July 29, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 35422, July 1, 1997; 64 FR 30392, June 8, 1999]
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 8, 2011/s/ Brian T. BeckwithBrian T. Beckwith,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Michael L. DeMarcoMichael L. DeMarco,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





23
§ 21.9720 Certification of enrollment. Except as stated in § 21.9680, an institution of higher learning must certify an eligible individual's enrollment before he or she may receive educational assistance. ( a ) *Institutions of higher learning must certify most enrollments.* VA does not, as a condition of payment of tuition assistance top-up or advance payment, require institutions of higher learning to certify the enrollments of eligible individuals who either are seeking tuition assistance top-up or, in the cases described in § 21.9715, are seeking an advance payment. VA does not require organizations or entities offering a licensing or certification test to certify that the eligible individual took the test. In all other cases, the institution of higher learning must certify the eligible individual's enrollment before he or she may receive educational assistance. This certification must be in a form specified by the Secretary and contain such information as specified by the Secretary. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3014(b), 3031, 3034(a), 3323(a), 3482(g), 3680, 3687, 3689, 5101(a))
( b ) *Length of the enrollment period covered by the enrollment certification.* ( 1 ) Institutions of higher learning that offer courses on a term, quarter, or semester basis will report enrollment for the term, quarter, semester, ordinary school year, or ordinary school year plus summer term. If the certification covers two or more terms, the institution of higher learning will report each term, quarter, or semester separately.
( 2 ) Institutions of higher learning organized on a year-round basis that do not offer courses on a term, quarter, or semester basis will report enrollment for the length of the course. The certification will include a report of the dates during which the institution of higher learning closes for any intervals designated in its approval data as breaks between school years.
( 3 ) When an eligible individual enrolls in a distance learning program leading to a standard college degree, the institution of higher learning's certification will include— ( i ) The enrollment date; and
( ii ) The ending date for the period being certified. If the institution of higher learning has no prescribed maximum time for completion, the certification must include an ending date based on the educational institution's estimate for completion.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034(a), 3323(a), 3684)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2900-0073)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 43.6 Controlling legal authority; no unwritten or non-public binding policy or guidance.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, all decisions of the Board are expected to comport with all applicable statutes, regulations, binding case law, and written Office policy and guidance applicable to Board proceedings. There shall be no unwritten Office or Board policy or guidance that is binding on any panel of the Board. All written policy and guidance binding on panels of the Board shall be made public.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30505

Summary Calendar

CARLA S. SANDERS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., Etc.; ET AL,

Defendants,

RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary of the

Louisiana Department of Public Safety

and Corrections, in his individual

capacity,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-768-T

-------------------- November 28, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant Richard L. Stalder has filed an interlocutory appeal

challenging the magistrate judge’s denial of his qualified immunity

defense to plaintiff Carla Sander s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.

Stalder’s defense was raised as a motion to dismiss the complaint

for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,No. 01-30505

-2-

pursuant to F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 12(b)(6). Stalder contends that Sanders

has failed to allege a violation of a clearly est ablished

constitutional right because no case law from this circuit states

that the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and

Corrections can be held liable for a failure to release a prisoner

through an improper time calculation if he is not per sonally

involved with the calculation. Sanders’s assertion that she was

detained for nineteen days after she should have been released

adequately alleges a claim of false imprisonment, which may be

raised under the Fourth Amendment. S ee Sanders v. English

, 950

F.2d 1152, 1159 (5th Cir. 1992). Her allegations that Stalder was

a decision maker for the Department of Public Safety and

Corrections, that he shut down the division that calculated goodtime credits during an office move, and that he failed to establish

a policy for continuing to calculate accumulated good-time credits

during the shutdown adequately alleges a policy leading to the

constitutional violation, which is sufficient to allege supervisory

liability. Thompkins v. Belt , 828 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1987).

Stalder also alleges that Sanders has made conclusional

allegations in her complaint that are unsupported by the record.

He is incorrect; Sanders’s allegations are drawn from the facts she

has set forth in her complaint. This court is required to read

those allegation in a light most favorable to Sanders. See Shipp

v. McMahon

, 234 F.3d 907, 911 (5th Cir. 2000). When this is done,

Sanders has alleged a possible va lid claim for relief. As a

result, the judgment denying qualified immunity is AFFIRMED.
§ 57.308 Nursing student loan promissory note. ( a ) *Promissory note form.* Each nursing student loan must be evidenced by a properly executed promissory note in a form approved by the Secretary. The school must safeguard the promissory note against fire, theft, and tampering. ( 1 ) Each promissory note must state that the loan will bear interest on the unpaid balance computed only for periods during which repayment of the loan is required, at the rate of 5 percent per year.
( 2 ) Each promissory note must contain an acceleration clause provided by the Secretary, which will permit the acceleration of delinquent loans at the school's option.
( 3 ) A copy of each executed note must be supplied by the school to the student borrower.
( b ) *Security.* A school must require security or endorsement if the borrower is a minor and if, under the applicable State law, the note signed by him or her would not create a binding obligation. The school may not require security or endorsement in any other circumstances.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0047) [50 FR 34434, Aug. 23, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 13771, Apr. 4, 1991; 57 FR 45735, Oct. 5, 1992]
#### Frederic C. Dean, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles Cunningham, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1899.)

Place of trial — Occupation and residence, *by*street and number, of material witnesses must be shown.

Upon an application to change the place of trial of an action, the moving papers should, where alleged material and necessary witnesses are residents of a city, show the street and number of their residences and state their occupations.

Motion to change place of trial.

Horace McGuire, for motion.

Baldwin & Boston, opposed.

Giegerich, J.

The only means of identification which the moving papers afford of the six persons designated as material and necessary witnesses are, that they reside in the city of Bochester, county of Monroe, and State of Few York, and that three of them are employees of the defendant. Feither the street nor number of the house where any of these witnesses reside is given, and, except as above indicated, their occupation is not disclosed. This, to my mind, is insufficient in the light of the rules which control applications to change the place of trial. In Lyman v. Gramercy Club, 28 App. Div. 30, Green, J., speaking for a majority of the court, said (p. 35): *“*The moving and opposing papers used upon such an application should disclose the occupation and the residence by street and number of every person so designated as a material witness when such person is a resident of a city. Otherwise, the opposing party might be unable to ascertain whether such persons were in existence, or to otherwise verify the allegations respecting the necessity of calling them as witnesses at the trial.” The motion is,- therefore, denied, with $10 costs to the plaintiff, with leave to renew on additional papers.

Motion denied, with $10 costs to plaintiff, with leave to renew.
§ 21.342 Leave accounting policy. ( a ) *Amount of leave.* A veteran pursuing one of the programs listed in § 21.340(a) may be authorized up to 30 days of leave by the case manager during a twelve-month period. The beginning date of the first twelve-month period is the commencing date of the original award, and the ending date is twelve months from the beginning date, with subsequent twelve-month periods running consecutively thereafter.
( b ) *Additional leave under exceptional circumstances.* A veteran in a program may be authorized up to 15 additional days of leave during the twelve-month period by the case manager under exceptional circumstances, such as extended illness or family problems.
( c ) *Absence.* For the purpose of determining when a leave of absence may be authorized, a veteran who elects subsistence allowance shall be considered absent during any period in which he or she is: ( 1 ) Not in attendance under the rules and regulations of the educational institution, rehabilitation center, or sheltered workshop;
( 2 ) Not considered at work under the rules of the training establishment; or
( 3 ) Not present at a scheduled period of individual instruction.
( d ) *System of records.* An educational institution, training establishment, rehabilitation center, or other facility or individual providing training and rehabilitation services under Chapter 31 may utilize the same system of records to determine absence as the one used for similarly circumstanced nonveterans.
( e ) *Change in rate of pursuit.* The amount of approved leave is not affected by the veteran's rate of pursuit of a rehabilitation program.
( f ) *Charging leave.* VA shall charge 1 day of leave for each day or part of a day of absence from pursuit of a rehabilitation program.
( g ) *Limitation on carrying leave over to another period.* The veteran may not carry over unused days of leave from one twelve-month period to another.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3110)
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984; 50 FR 9622, Mar. 11, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 14649, Apr. 11, 1991]
33-15-05-04. Methods of measurement. 
3. The determination of particulate matter emissions with an aerodynamic 

diameter less than or equal to ten micrometers [PM10] and particulate 

matter emissions with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 

two and one-half micrometers [PM2.

5] must be made in accordance with 

the methods established in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, 

appendix M, as applicable. 

History: Amended effective October 1, 1987; June 1, 1992; June 1, 2001; March 1, 

2003; January 1, 2013. 

General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03 

Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03 

11
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mortgage market trends[electronic resource].**
 
1997:Volume 01 Issues: 01 | 02
1998:Volume 02 Issues: 01 | 02 | 03
1999:Volume 03 Issues: 01 | 02 | 03
2000:Volume 04 Issues: 01
 
SuDoc Number:T 71.9:
Item Number:0597-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:000544153
 
January 28, 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN P. STROH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 371 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
****

This chart presents 1996 New Jersey exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for New Jersey
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00798

- CV

Stephen W. MABERY and Damon Thorpe,

Appellants

v.

MORANI RIVER RANCH HOLDINGS LP, MORANI GP LLC , Morani River Ranch LLC,

Kevin L. Reid and Stewards of Wildlife Conservation Inc.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI03565

Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Un opposed M otion for Extension o f Time to file Appellant ’ s Re ply Brief is her eby

GRANTED. Time is extended until Oct ober 5, 2020.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and af fixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 10(a)(iv)


Amendment No. 4 dated as of October 29, 2002 to Employment Agreement dated as of
January 1, 1998 (the "Agreement") by and between Colonial Commercial Corp., a
New York corporation (the "Company") and Bernard Korn, residing at 2 Richmond
Road, Apt. #3G, Lido Beach, N.Y. 11561)(the "Employee").

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

        Pursuant to an action by the Board of Directors of Colonial Commercial
Corp. on October 29, 2002, it was resolved that the Employment Agreement of
Bernard Korn be amended to provide for immediate full payment by Universal
Supply Group, Inc. of all compensation required pursuant to the Employment
Agreement for its full term as severance pay, in the event of a change of
ownership of Universal Supply Group. Inc. that shall not be approved by the
Directors of Colonial Commercial Corp. and Universal Supply Group, Inc.

         Accordingly, for good and valuable consideration, a second paragraph to
Section 2.01 of the Agreement should be added to read as follows:

         The Employee shall be entitled to full payment by Universal Supply
Group, Inc. of all compensation required pursuant to the Employment Agreement
for its full term as severance pay, the in the event of a change of ownership of
Universal Supply Group. Inc. that shall not be approved by the Directors of
Colonial Commercial Corp. and Universal Supply Group, Inc.

         Except as amended hereby, the Agreement and any prior amendments is in
full respects ratified and confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment as of the
date set forth above.

                            COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP.


                            By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
                            ----------------------------
                                James W. Stewart
                                Executive Vice President

                            Employee:

                            /S/ BERNARD KORN
                            ----------------------------
                                Bernard Korn



<PAGE>