alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60800 (Summary Calendar)

HAROLD J. BLAKELY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(USDC No. 2:95-CV-108-PG)

- - - - - - - - - - July 28, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harold J. Blakely appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security income. Blakely argues that substantial evidence did not exist to support the fi nding that he was not disabled and that a prior application should have been reopened. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Further, this court lacks2

jurisdiction to address Blakely’s argum ent that his previous application should have been reopened. See Torres v. Shalala , 48 F.3d 887, 890 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
#### §§ 20.7-20.99 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  333,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,400
<PP&E>                                         934,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,274,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          536,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     588,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,274,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               415,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3631 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-060-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modify the cockpit 

door frame 53.0 $4,505.0

0

$2,430 $6,935.00 70 $485,450.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $485,450

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in April 2004, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Technical Bulletin 2009-1,                     *Deferral of the Effective Date of**Technical Bulletin 2006-1.*

                    Technical Bulletin 2009-1 defers the effective date of Technical Bulletin 2006-1,                     *Recognition and Measurement of**Asbestos-Related Cleanup Costs,*                     for two years to provide Federal agencies with additional time to resolve implementation issues that have been identified since Technical Bulletin 2006-1 was issued.                 

                    The Technical Bulletin is available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​tchbl.html.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512-7350. 

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463. 

Dated: September 22, 2009. 

Charles Jackson, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-23252 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 6-09]

                    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the                           ( print page 47618)                        transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows:                

# Date and Time:

Wednesday, September 23, 2009, at 11 a.m.

# Subject Matter:

Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against Albania and Libya.

# Status:

Open.

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. E9-22360 Filed 9-14-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
#### § 404.14 Confidentiality of information.

35 U.S.C. 209(f) requires that any plan submitted pursuant to § 404.8(a)(8) and any report required by 35 U.S.C. 209(d)(2) shall be treated as commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged and confidential and not subject to disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552.

[88 FR 17740, Mar. 24, 2023]
§ 0.601 Core Values. VA's Core Values define VA employees. They describe the organization's culture and character, and serve as the foundation for the way VA employees should interact with each other, as well as with people outside the organization. They also serve as a common bond between all employees regardless of their grade, specialty area, or location. These Core Values are Integrity, Commitment, Advocacy, Respect, and Excellence. Together, the first letters of the Core Values spell “I CARE,” and VA employees should adopt this motto and these Core Values in their day-to-day operations. ( a ) *Integrity.* VA employees will act with high moral principle, adhere to the highest professional standards, and maintain the trust and confidence of all with whom they engage.
( b ) *Commitment.* VA employees will work diligently to serve veterans and other beneficiaries, be driven by an earnest belief in VA's mission, and fulfill their individual responsibilities and organizational responsibilities.
( c ) *Advocacy.* VA employees will be truly veteran-centric by identifying, fully considering, and appropriately advancing the interests of veterans and other beneficiaries.
( d ) *Respect.* VA employees will treat all those they serve and with whom they work with dignity and respect, and they will show respect to earn it.
( e ) *Excellence.* VA employees will strive for the highest quality and continuous improvement, and be thoughtful and decisive in leadership, accountable for their actions, willing to admit mistakes, and rigorous in correcting them.
[Cite as State v. Cole, 124 Ohio St.3d 98, 2009-Ohio-6411.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . C OLE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State v. Cole, 124 Ohio St.3d 98, 2009-Ohio-6411.] Certified question answe red by State v. Cargile — Cause remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of State v. Cargile. (Nos. 2009-0030 and 2009-0315

— Submitted November 18, 2009

— Decided December 10, 2009.)
A PPEAL from and C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 91305, 2008-Ohio-6647.

__________________ {¶ 1} The certified question in case No. 2009-0315 is answered by our opinion in State v. Cargile , 123 Ohio St.3d 343, 2009-Ohio-4939, 916 N.E.2d
775. {¶ 2} There is no indication in the c ourt of appeals’ opinion below whether the defendant was warned that bringing illegal contraband into the detention facility would result in additional charges or whether the defendant affirmatively denied possessing any such material. However, whether a warning by an officer and a denial of possession of contraband by the defendant are required prior to a conviction for illega l conveyance was not a consideration
before this court in State v. Cargile . Accordingly, in order to give the parties the opportunity to consider these factor s, case No. 2009-0030 is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of State v. Cargile and consideration of whether the absence of both an officer’s warning and the defendant’s denial of possession of contraband, if a pplicable, would alter the result below

. M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 O’D ONNELL , J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

__________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Thorin Freeman, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defende r, and Andrew J. King, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

______________________
***Public and Private School Principle in the United States: A Statistical Profile, 1987-88 to 1993-94*****Table B4.-Standard errors for Table A4:  Percentage of public school principals           by community type, by sex, race-ethnicity, and age:  1993-94**----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                   Community type                                 -------------------------------------------------------Principal characteristics        Central city  Urban fringe/large town  Rural/small town----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total number                        287.5                369.3                326.9Sex Male                                1.51                 1.31                 0.93 Female                              1.51                 1.31                 0.93Race-ethnicity American Indian/Alaska Native       0.18                 0.14                 0.13 Asian/Pacific Islander              0.32                 0.36                 0.05 Black non-Hispanic                  1.34                 0.83                 0.28 White non-Hispanic                  1.68                 1.06                 0.34 Hispanic                            1.06                 0.74                 0.26Total minority                       1.68                 1.06                 0.34Age Under 35                            0.26                 0.26                 0.28 35-39                               0.73                 0.61                 0.52 40-44                               1.08                 1.17                 0.84 45-49                               1.68                 1.30                 0.89 50-54                               1.19                 1.21                 0.84 55 or over                          1.15                 0.88                 0.76Average age                          0.17                 0.15                 0.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SOURCE:  U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey:  1993-94 (Public School Principal and School Questionnaires).
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.949 Examiner's Office action closing prosecution in *inter partes* reexamination.

Upon consideration of the issues a second or subsequent time, or upon a determination of patentability of all claims, the examiner shall issue an Office action treating all claims present in the *inter partes* reexamination, which may be an action closing prosecution. The Office action shall set forth all rejections and determinations not to make a proposed rejection, and the grounds therefor. An Office action will not usually close prosecution if it includes a new ground of rejection which was not previously addressed by the patent owner, unless the new ground was necessitated by an amendment.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 20.901 Rule 901. Submission of additional evidence after initiation of appeal.

Subject to the limitations set forth in Rule 1304 (§ 20.1304 of this part), an appellant may submit additional evidence, or information as to the availability of additional evidence, after initiating an appeal. The provisions of this section do not apply in proceedings before the General Counsel conducted under part 14 of this chapter to cancel accreditation or to review fee agreements and expenses for reasonableness.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5902, 5903, 5904; 38 U.S.C. 5904, 7105(d)(1) (2016))

[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 29879, May 22, 2008. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 188, 190, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.3 Jurisdiction.

(a) The Board may exercise exclusive jurisdiction within the Office over every involved application and patent during the proceeding, as the Board may order.

(b) A petition to institute a trial must be filed with the Board consistent with any time period required by statute.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Illini Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the hereof (the “Report”), I Burnard K. McHone,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ Burnard K. McHone                  |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                   |   |   |
| Burnard K. McHone                      |   |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |   |
| November 10, 2004                      |   |   |
|                                        |        |        |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 12, 2008



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.