Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 2015 / Notices 45655 

The EPA’s adequacy review is separate 

from the EPA’s attainment plan 

completeness review and it is not 

dispositive of the EPA’s ultimate action 

on the attainment plan. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–767Iq. 

Dated: July 15, 2015. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2015–18832 Filed 7–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0322: FRL–9931–62– 

Region 10] 

Adequacy Determination for the Grants 

Pass, Oregon Carbon Monoxide State 

Implementation Plan for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy 

determination. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is notifying the public of 

its finding that the Grants Pass, Oregon 

second 10-year limited maintenance 

plan (LMP) for carbon monoxide (CO) is 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. The LMP was submitted to 

the EPA by the State of Oregon 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ODEQ or the State) on April 22, 2015. 

As a result of our adequacy finding, 

regional emissions analyses will no 

longer be required as part of the 

transportation conformity 

demonstrations for CO for the Grants 

Pass area. 

DATES: This finding is effective August 

17, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

finding will be available at the EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. You may also 

contact Dr. Karl Pepple, U.S. EPA, 

Region 10 (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth 

Ave., Suite 900, Seattle WA 98101; (206) 

553–1778; or by email at pepple.karl@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action provides notice of the EPA’s 

adequacy finding regarding the second 

10-year CO limited maintenance plan 

(LMP) for the Grants Pass area for 

purposes of transportation conformity. 

The EPA’s finding was made pursuant 

to the adequacy review process for 

implementation plan submissions 

delineated at 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1) under 

which the EPA reviews the adequacy of 

a state implementation plan (SIP) 

submission prior to the EPA’s final 

action on the implementation plan. 

The State submitted the LMP to the 

EPA on April 22, 2015. Pursuant to 40 

CFR 93.118(f)(1), the EPA notified the 

public of its receipt of this plan and its 

review for an adequacy determination 

on the EPA’s Web site and requested 

public comment by no later than June 3, 

2015. The EPA received no comments 

on the plan during the comment period. 

As part of our analysis, we also 

reviewed the State’s compilation of 

public comments and response to 

comments that were submitted during 

the State’s public process for the LMP. 

There were no adverse comments 

directed at the on-road portion of the 

LMP. 

Based on our review, the EPA believes 

it is appropriate to find this LMP 

adequate for use in transportation 

conformity prior to final action on the 

LMP. The EPA has moved forward with 

an approval notice for the Grants Pass 

CO LMP. Until that action is final and 

effective, this adequacy finding allows 

the State to apply the LMP for 

transportation conformity purposes. 

The EPA notified ODEQ in a letter 

dated June 24, 2015 (adequacy letter), 

subsequent to the close of the EPA 

comment period, that the EPA had 

found the LMP to be adequate for use in 

transportation conformity. A copy of the 

adequacy letter and its enclosure are 

available in the docket for this action 

and at the EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.109(e), limited 

maintenance plans are not required to 

contain on-road motor vehicle 

emissions budgets. Accordingly, as a 

result of this adequacy finding, regional 

emissions analyses will no longer be 

required as a part of the transportation 

conformity demonstrations for CO for 

the Grants Pass area. However, other 

conformity requirements still remain 

such as consultation (40 CFR 93.112), 

transportation control measures (40 CFR 

93.113), and project level analysis (40 

CFR 93.116). 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

Transportation conformity to a SIP 

means that on-road transportation 

activities will not produce new air 

quality violations, worsen existing 

violations, or delay timely attainment of 

the national ambient air quality 

standards. The minimum criteria by 

which we determine whether a SIP is 

adequate for conformity purposes are 

specified at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The 

EPA’s analysis of how the LMP satisfies 

these criteria is found in the adequacy 

letter and its enclosure. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–767Iq. 

Dated: July 15, 2015. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2015–18830 Filed 7–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0085; FRL– 

9931–71–OEI] 

Proposed Information Collection 

Request; Comment Request; NESHAP 

for Radionuclides (Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency is planning to submit an 

information collection request (ICR), 

‘‘NESHAP for Radionuclides (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 1100.15, OMB Control No. 

2060–0249) to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

approval in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is 

soliciting public comments on specific 

aspects of the proposed information 

collection as described below. This is a 

proposed extension of the ICR. An 

Agency may not conduct or sponsor and 

a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing the above referenced Docket 

ID Number online using 

www.regulations.gov (our preferred 

method), or by mail to: EPA Docket 

Center, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Philip Egidi, Radiation Protection 

Division, Office of Radiation and Indoor 

Air, Mail Code 6608J, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES