alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41774.

#### DAVIS v. HILL.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. An action brought November 24, 1964, to recover damages for an injury sustained November 24, 1962, is barred by the statute of limitation, *Code*§ 3-1004; *Jones v. Smith,*28 Ga. 41; *Peterson v. Georgia R. &c. Co.,*97 Ga. 798 (25 SE 370). The running of the statute begins on the day the injury was suffered and without reference to the time of day or fractions of days. *Dowling v. Lester,*74 Ga. App. 290 (39 SE2d 576).

2. Where the time prescribed for the doing of an act, including the bringing of an action, is to be computed by years or months, Sundays are not to be excluded. That the last day of the period falls on Sunday does not, therefore, prevent the bar of the statute. *McLendon v. State,*14 Ga. App. 274 (80 SE 692); *Brown v. Emerson Brick Co.,*15 Ga. App. 332, 333 (3) (83 SE 160). There is stronger reason for applying this *281rule to a situation where the injury was suffered on a Sunday and holding, as we do here, that it does not toll the beginning of the running of the statute.

Argued February 9, 1966

Decided March 8, 1966.

*Pickett, Pickett, Ackerman, Shipley*<fc *Norvell,*for appellant.

*Bryan, Carter, Ansley •& Smith, W. Colquitt Carter,*for appellee.

3. An allegation that plaintiff suffered great physical and mental pain and that he was physically and mentally incapacitated because thereof and unable to file any action during the entire week following the injury does not toll the running of the statute. *Lowe v. Bailey,*112 Ga. App. 516 (145 SE2d 760).

The sustaining of the general demurrer on the ground that the action was barred must be

*Affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
# Official Journal L 407/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 407 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 633 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 407

English edition

Legislation

Volume 633 December 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1815 of 23 November 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications | 1 |
| | * | Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1815 of 23 November 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications

1

*

Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.77

                                                                   Perry A. Sook
                                                                   President/CEO

TO: Tim Busch

FR: Perry A. Sook

RE: Addendum to Employment Agreement

DA: 8/28/03


Reference is hereby made to your Executive Employment Agreement with Nexstar
Broadcasting Group, Inc. This memorandum will serve as an addendum.

Paragraph 6 (b)(i), Termination Payments. The period is hereby extended to one
year.

Please indicate your agreement with and acceptance of the terms and conditions
of this addendum as of the date written by signing below.

Sincerely,                                 Agreed and Accepted;


/s/ Perry A. Sook                          /s/ Tim Busch
Perry A. Sook                              Tim Busch
President/CEO                              Senior Vice President



                        Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc.
            909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Suite 1450, Irving, TX 75039,
                       (972) 373-8800 FAX (972) 373-8888
§ 14.667 Claims payable. ( a ) No claim shall be paid unless timely filed in proper form as provided in § 14.665 and the preponderance of the evidence establishes that the loss or damage: ( 1 ) Actually occurred and the amount claimed is reasonable,
( 2 ) Was incident to the employee's service and his or her possession of the property was reasonable, useful, or proper under the circumstances,
( 3 ) Did not occur at quarters occupied within the 50 States or the District of Columbia that were not assigned to the claimant or otherwise provided in kind by the United States.
( 4 ) Was not caused wholly or partly by the negligent act of claimant, the claimant's agent, or employee, and that the claimant has no right to indemnification for the loss or damage from other than the United States, except to the extent that the claimant assigns such right to the United States and agrees to furnish evidence required to enable the United States to enforce such right. In the event there is a right to recovery for the loss or damage from a carrier or insurer the claimant will be required to file a timely claim for such recovery before consideration of the claim against the United States.
( b ) No claim for the cost of repair or replacement of personal property of employees damaged or destroyed by patients or domiciliary members while such employees are engaged in the performance of official duties shall be entertained under §§ 14.664 through 14.667, unless claim filed pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 703(a)(5) (§ 17.78 of this chapter) has been finally denied for the reason that such claim did not meet the criteria established by that law.
[38 FR 5475, Mar. 1, 1973, as amended at 42 FR 41422, Aug. 17, 1977]
HomeRemarks and Releases – London International Media Hub

# 						Remarks and Releases – London International Media Hub					

							Press briefings from the London International Media Hub						

		Subscribe		

22 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAimee CutronaChristopher A. LandbergDouglas HoytGayle E. SmithGeoffrey R. PyattJohn T. GodfreyKaren DonfriedNathaniel C. FickRena BitterRina AmiriSeth Center

Select a LocationBangladeshEgyptGermanyGuinea-BissauIndiaIranIraqIsraelJordanLiberiaLibyaPakistanPalestinian TerritoriesRussiaSaudi ArabiaSierra LeoneSudanTunisiaTurkeyUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomWest Bank

Select a Release TypeSpecial BriefingSpecial Briefing via Telephone

Select a Bureau/OfficeAfrica Regional Media HubBureau of Near Eastern AffairsLondon International Media Hub

          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with USAID Response Director Dan Dieckhaus and Vice Admiral Brad Cooper	  May 15, 2024 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Special Envoy for Sudan Tom Perriello	  March 21, 2024London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with  Geoffrey R. Pyatt, Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources	  February 5, 2024London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on Power of Democracy and the Future of Peacekeeping in Africa After the AU Financing Security Council Resolution	  January 31, 2024 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Nathaniel C. Fick Ambassador-at-Large for Cyberspace and Digital Policy and Dr. Seth Center Deputy Envoy for Critical and Emerging Technology	  Nathaniel C. FickJuly 26, 2023London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Rear Admiral Ronald J. Piret, Commander of the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command	  June 22, 2023London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Dilawar Syed, Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs	  June 20, 2023London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Lieutenant General DeAnna M. Burt, United States Space Force	  June 1, 2023 
          -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on the 40th Anniversary of the U.S. Department of State’s Antiterrorism Program	  April 27, 2023The London Hub 
          -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO, Ambassador Julianne Smith	  March 31, 2023 

123next page

Back to Top
#### John F. Porter, Respondent, *v.*Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, tenth district, borough of Manhattan, entered in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury. .

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

Hart *&*Hopkins, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The Appellate Division of this department having declared the act creating the Municipal Court of the City of New York constitutional (Irwin v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 38 App. Div. 253), the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman, P. J., and MaoLear, J.

Levertritt, J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 184 (Thursday, September 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), 1301.34(a), this is notice that on July 1, 2009, Fisher Clinical 
Services, Inc., 7554 Schantz Road, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18106, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of Noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed substance for analytical 
research and clinical trials.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than October 26, 2009.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants 
for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance in 
schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such 
registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 
1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-23066 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
*The HONORABLE CHARLES R. WOLLE, Chief Judge of the

United States District Court for the Southern District of

Iowa, sitting by designation.

___________

No. 95-2395

___________

Donna M. Fouts, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner * Northern District of Iowa.

of Social Security, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 14, 1995

 Filed: January 16, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and WOLLE,* Chief District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Following a fall at work, Donna M. Fouts underwent back

surgery in October 1991 and applied for Social Security disability

benefits in March 1992, alleging a disability onset date of

September 17, 1991. After her application was denied initially and

on reconsideration, an administrative hearing was held in February

1993. The administrative law judge denied Ms. Fouts's application,

finding that she has the residual functional capacity to perform

jobs such as statistical clerk, night clerk, timekeeper, office

helper, assembler, and hand packager. The Commissioner's Appeals

Council accepted additional medical evidence but denied review.
 1

The HONORABLE EDWARD J. McMANUS, United States District Judge

for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-

Ms. Fouts then sought judicial review of the final agency action

denying her application for benefits. 

The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of the

Commissioner, concluding that her decision denying benefits is

supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Ms.

Fouts appealed, contending that the objective medical evidence, the

observations of third parties, her pain medication, her functional

limitations, and her daily activities are consistent with her claim

of disabling pain; that the ALJ erred in considering her refusal of

certain treatment; and that the ALJ's questions to a vocational

expert did not properly include all her limitations. Having

carefully considered the administrative record, we conclude that

the Commissioner's decision must be affirmed for the reasons stated

by the district court in its Order of April 3, 1995. See 8th Cir.

Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 1.656 Information to be submitted by inventor. ( a ) In the case of an invention or believed invention, the inventor will prepare a statement for submission to his or her immediate superior. It will be submitted regardless of where the ownership is believed to exist. The statement will consist of two parts: ( 1 ) One part of the statement will be a disclosure of the invention sufficient to permit the preparation of a patent applicant. It shall consist of a description, including where applicable, of the parts or components of the invention as shown on the drawings or blueprints, accompanied further by a description of the construction and operation of the invention. Photographs of the invention may be included. The inventor should state pertinent prior art known to him or her, and set forth in detail as clearly as possible the respects which his or her invention differs.
( 2 ) The other part of the statement will set forth the circumstances attending the making of the invention. It will include the full name and address of the inventor; the grade and title of his or her position; whether full time or part time; his or her duties at the time the invention was made; the facts pertinent to a determination whether the invention bore a direct relation to or was made in consequence of such official duties; whether there was, and if so, the terms of any special agreement or understanding with respect to use or manufacture of his or her invention; date of the invention; when and where it was conceived, constructed and tested; whether it was made entirely during working hours; whether, and to what extent there was a contribution by the Government of any of the following: Facilities; equipment; materials or supplies; funds; information; time or services of other Government employees on duty. When the invention is disclosed through publication, or in consultation with a manufacturer or attorney, simultaneous notification of the publication shall be given to the Office of General Counsel. A copy of the article will accompany the notification.
( b ) The inventor's immediate superior shall promptly review the statement of the employee inventor for completeness and accuracy, and shall certify that the employee's statement of circumstances attending the invention is or is not correct, giving reasons if pertinent. The file should then be submitted through the facility head (or administration heads or top staff officials in the case of Central Office employees) to the General Counsel together with any comments or recommendations.
[61 FR 29658, June 12, 1996]
#### §§ 15.112-15.129 [Reserved]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 441/2005

of 17 March 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 11 to 17 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
#### Frederick Bayerdorfer, Appellant, v. Frank Bowles, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term.

Carl FisehertiHansen, for appellant.

Barge' & Btaliknecht (Walter .Barge, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In making the order appealed from the Special Term justice follows the settled practice of this court. Where a summons is served with a notice but no verified complaint served,., the practice here is to apply to the Special Term for leave to enter, judgment. We think that it was not necessary .in this, instance to appoint a referee to determine the amount of damage. ,

The clerk may do so, nor do- we think that costs should have been allowed. Therefore, the order must be modified by striking therefrom the costs allowed, also the provision for appointing a referee, and as -so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs Or disbursements to either party. Of course the plaintiff’s attorney will credit on the issuance of the execution the amount received herein (by the client.

Present: Fitzsím'ons, Oh. J.',. and McCarthy, J.

Order modified, and' as modified affirmed, without costs.
§ 17.547 Eligibility. An individual is eligible to participate in the RCSSP if the individual meets the following requirements: ( a ) Is accepted for enrollment or be currently enrolled on a full-time basis in a program of study at an accredited educational institution, school, or training program leading to a terminal doctorate degree in psychology, or a terminal masters degree in social work, marriage and family therapy, or mental health counseling that would meet the education requirements for appointment to a position in one of those fields under 38 U.S.C. 7402(b); and
( b ) Enters into an agreement with the Secretary under § 17.551.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.183 Suspension of rules.

In an extraordinary situation, when justice requires, any requirement of the regulations in this part which is not a requirement of the statutes may be suspended or waived by the Director or the Director's designee, *sua sponte*, or on petition of the interested party, subject to such other requirements as may be imposed. Any petition under this section must be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in § 1.17(f).

[69 FR 56544, Sept. 21, 2004]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.