alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.480 Prohibited coverage limitations, preexisting condition exclusions, and relation to other laws. ( a ) *Prohibited coverage limitations.* The State may not impose any annual, lifetime or other aggregate dollar limitations on any medical or dental services which are covered under the State plan.
( b ) *Preexisting condition exclusions.* ( 1 ) Except as permitted under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the State may not permit the imposition of any pre-existing condition exclusion for covered services under the State plan.
( 2 ) If the State obtains health benefits coverage through payment or a contract for health benefits coverage under a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, the State may permit the imposition of a pre-existing condition exclusion but only to the extent that the exclusion is permitted under the applicable provisions of part 7 of subtitle B of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act.
( c ) *Relation of title XXI to other laws.* ( 1 ) ERISA. Nothing in this title affects or modifies section 514 of ERISA with respect to a group health plan as defined by section 2791(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act.
( 2 ) *Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).* Health benefits coverage provided under a State plan and coverage provided as a cost-effective alternative, as described in subpart J of this part, is creditable coverage for purposes of part 7 of subtitle B of title II of ERISA, title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act, and subtitle K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( 3 ) *Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA).* Health benefits coverage under a group health plan provided under a State plan must comply with the requirements of the MHPA of 1996 regarding parity in the application of annual and lifetime dollar limits to mental health benefits in accordance with 45 CFR 146.136.
( 4 ) *Newborns and Mothers Health Protection Act (NMHPA).* Health benefits coverage under a group health plan provided under a State plan must comply with the requirements of the NMHPA of 1996 regarding requirements for minimum hospital stays for mothers and newborns in accordance with 45 CFR 146.130 and 148.170.
[66 FR 2678, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 89 FR 22876, Apr. 2, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008. The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   November 14, 2008                 /s/ Raul S. McQuivey
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Raul S. McQuivey
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated:   November 14, 2008                 /s/ Sidney C. Hooper
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Sidney C. Hooper
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6869
JEROME E. CASSELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEVESTER THOMPSON; JULIA LAFOON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-690-3) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome E. Cassell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his § 1983 action for failure to obey magistrate judge's order to submit evidence of exhaustion of administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no rev ersible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cassell v. Thompson , No. CA95-690-3 (E.D. Va. May 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 20.109 Rule 109. Delegation of authority to Vice Chairman, Deputy Vice Chairmen, or Members of the Board. ( a ) The authority exercised by the Chairman of the Board of Veterans' Appeals described in Rules 106(b) and 107(b) (§§ 20.106(b) and 20.107(b)) may also be exercised by the Vice Chairman of the Board.
( b ) The authority exercised by the Chairman of the Board of Veterans' Appeals described in Rules 1004 and 1002(c) (§§ 20.1004 and 20.1002(c)) may also be exercised by the Vice Chairman of the Board and by Deputy Vice Chairmen of the Board.
( c ) The authority exercised by the Chairman of the Board of Veterans' Appeals described in Rule 2 (§ 20.2), may also be exercised by the Vice Chairman of the Board; by Deputy Vice Chairmen of the Board; and, in connection with a proceeding or motion assigned to them by the Chairman, by a Member or Members of the Board.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512(a), 7102, 7104)
[84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2336 

To amend title 35, United States Code, relating to the funding of the 

United States Patent and Trademark Office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2007 

Mr. BERMAN (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COBLE, 

Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, 

and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, relating to the 

funding of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FUNDING. 

4 (a) FUNDING.—Section 42 of title 35, United States 

5 Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Appropria7 tion’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (c), in the first sentence— 


jlentini on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2336 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘To the extent’’ and all 

2 that follows through ‘‘fees’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘Fees’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘shall be collected by and 

5 shall be available to the Director’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘shall be collected by the Director and shall be 

7 available until expended’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2007. 

11 (2) TERMINATION OF APPROPRIATION.—The 

12 provisions of any appropriation Act that make 

13 amounts available pursuant to section 42(c) of title 

14 35, United States Code, and are in effect on the ef15 fective date set forth in subsection (a) shall cease to 

16 be effective on that effective date. 

Æ 


jlentini on PRODPC74 with BILLS
HomePopulations...Men

# Men

Data from many high-burden countries show that men, particularly those ages 24-35 years, access HIV testing and treatment at low rates. Therefore, many men living with HIV do not know they are HIV-positive, endangering their own health and helping fuel the spread of HIV among adolescent girls and young women.

PEPFAR is committed to expanding access to HIV prevention and treatment for men. These efforts includes supporting specific male-friendly strategies for HIV service delivery, such as dedicated men’s corners at existing health clinics, scaled up HIV index testing, expanded clinic hours, and deeper community engagement to better reach men.

##### MenStar Coalition

At the 2018 International AIDS Conference, PEPFAR joined the Elton John AIDS Foundation, Unitaid, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and Gilead Sciences to launch the MenStar Coalition. Announced by Sir Elton John and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, MenStar supports innovative approaches to deliver appropriate and effective HIV/AIDS services for men, increasing their rapid uptake of HIV testing, linkage to HIV treatment, and achievement of viral suppression. 

Under MenStar, multiple approaches are being deployed including:  data analytics and human-centered design to better adapt services to men; nuanced demand creation; targeted marketing; innovations, such as HIV self-testing; and supply-side solutions. The partnership is also ensuring that essential HIV commodities and services are available to meet increased consumer demand. MenStar brings together the HIV service delivery capacities of the public sector with the consumer-oriented marketing acumen of the private sector to optimize efforts in reaching men with HIV testing and treatment.

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000731727
<NAME>     SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                      18,063
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,963
<PP&E>                                   2,982,608
<DEPRECIATION>                          (1,804,549)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,227,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,831,823
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                45,355,365
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,451,222
<SALES>                                      6,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,387
<CGS>                                       10,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,418,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         123,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,545,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,545,847)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.060)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 08, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16379

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 09-00132-CR-ORL-22GJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

THOMAS K. TANNER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 8, 2010)

Before BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HUNT, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

 Honorable Willis B. Hunt, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation.
Thomas K. Tanner appeals his 262-month sentence following a plea of

guilty for distribution of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 2252A(a)(2)(B). Tanner seeks reversal of his sentence arguing that the district

court erred in finding that he had a prior conviction that subjected him to an

increased minimum and maximum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(1). On

this record, we find no reversible error. In evaluating Tanner’s prior conviction

for sentencing purposes, the district court did not err in considering the state court

indictment for his prior conviction in light of the ambiguity in the state court’s

final judgment in that case. See United States v. Aguilar-Ortiz, 450 F.3d 1271,

1273-74 (11th Cir. 2006). Based thereupon, the district court did not err in

determining that Tanner had a prior conviction in state court for the felony

exposure of his sexual or genital parts to a child under Virginia Code § 18.2-370,

which supports the sentence imposed within the increased statutory range of 15 to

40 years as set forth in § 2252A(b)(1). 

AFFIRMED.

2
§ 17.549 Award procedures. ( a ) *Priority.* In selecting individuals to participate in the RCSSP, VA will give priority to the following individuals: ( 1 ) An individual who agrees to be employed by Vet Centers located in communities that are: ( i ) Designated as a medically underserved population under section 330(b)(3) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(b)(3)); and
( ii ) In States with a per capita population of more than five percent veterans according to the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics and the Bureau of the Census.
( 2 ) A veteran.
( b ) *Placement criteria.* When determining which Vet Center a scholarship recipient will be placed to carry out their service obligation, VA will consider the priority criteria in paragraph (a) of this section and the size and professional makeup of the current Vet Center staff to ensure that the Vet Center staff has health care professionals that are licensed to supervise participants of the RCSSP from the same health care profession as required by VA professional qualification standards and a requirement of some State licensure boards for some disciplines for each of the four professions.
( c ) *Amount of funds.* VA will provide a scholarship to individuals who participate in the RCSSP to cover the actual costs of such individuals obtaining a terminal degree in psychology, social work, marriage and family therapy, or professional mental health counseling for a maximum of two years. If a participant completes their terminal degree in less than two years, the period of obligated service remains unchanged. ( 1 ) Social work, marriage and family therapy, and professional mental health counseling are master level programs that require approximately a two-year period for achieving the terminal degree. VA will fund RCSSP social work, marriage and family therapy, and professional mental health counseling participants for a maximum of two years.
( 2 ) Psychology is a doctoral level program requiring approximately five years for completion of the terminal academic degree. In addition, psychology graduates are required to undergo a one-year internship at either an American Psychology Association (APA) or Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) accredited internship program prior to qualifying for full time VA employment. VA will fund psychology participants for the last two years of their five-year academic training to obtain a terminal doctorate degree. VA will not provide funding for the one-year APA or CPA internship under the RCSSP.
( d ) *Payment of funds.* All such payments to scholarship participants are exempt from Federal taxation. The payments will consist of the actual cost of: ( 1 ) Tuition and required fees;
( 2 ) Other educational expenses, including books and laboratory equipment; and
( 3 ) A monthly stipend, for the duration of the scholarship award. The Secretary may determine the amount of the stipend paid to participants, but that amount may not exceed the maximum amount provided for in 38 U.S.C. 7613(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2009-0007]


Maximum Dollar Limit in the Fee Agreement Process

AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are increasing the maximum dollar amount limit for fee 
agreements approved under sections 206(a)(2)(A) and 1631(d)(2)(A) of 
the Social Security Act to $6,000. Effective June 22, 2009, decision-
makers may approve fee agreements up to the new limit provided that the 
fee agreement otherwise meets the statutory conditions of the agreement 
process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marg Handel, Office of Income Security 
Programs, phone (410) 965-4639, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79a968590d99f969993929bb7848496d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79a968590d99f969993929bb7848496d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Social Security Act (Act) provides a 
streamlined process for a representative to obtain approval of the fee 
he or she wishes to charge for representing a claimant before the 
agency. See, Sec. Sec.  206(a)(2)(A) and 1631(d)(2)(A) of the Act, as 
amended by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1990, Public 
Law No. 101-508, Sec.  5106. To use that process, the representative 
and the claimant must agree, in writing, to a fee that does not exceed 
the lesser of 25% of past due benefits or a prescribed dollar amount. 
OBRA of 1990 set the initial fee amount at $4,000 and gave the 
Commissioner the authority to increase it periodically, provided that 
the cumulative rate of increase did not at any time exceed the rate of 
increase in primary insurance amounts since January 1, 1991. The law 
further provided that notice of any increased amount shall be published 
in the Federal Register. On January 17, 2002, we published a notice 
raising the maximum fee to $5,300. With this notice, we announce that 
the maximum dollar amount for fee agreements will increase to $6,000. 
This increase does not exceed the rate of increase provided in OBRA of 
1990. We believe this increase will adequately compensate 
representatives for their services while ensuring that claimants are 
protected from excessive fees. A decision-maker may approve fees up to 
the new amount effective June 22, 2009. This effective date will ensure 
adequate time to provide training and guidance to our employees and to 
make necessary changes in our information technology infrastructure.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. E9-2332 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(i)

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comm Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, William F.
Farber, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results o operations of
         the Company.

Date: May 12, 2003                  /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    William F. Farber, Sr.
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Chairman of the Board/Director
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A signed original of this written Statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       46
§ 21.3304 Assistance during training. ( a ) *General.* A counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor will provide the professional and technical assistance needed by the eligible person in pursuing special restorative training. The assistance will be timely, sustained and personal.
( b ) *Adjustments in the training situation.* The counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor must be continually aware of the eligible person's progress. At frequent intervals he or she will determine whether the eligible person is progressing satisfactorily. When the counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor determines that adjustments are needed in the course or in the training situation, he or she will act immediately to bring about the adjustments in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) When the eligible person or his or her instructor indicates dissatisfaction with elements of the program, the counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor, through personal discussion with the eligible person or his or her instructor or both, will, if possible, correct the difficulty through such means as making minor adjustments in the course or by persuading the eligible person to give more attention to performance.
( 2 ) When major difficulties cannot be corrected, the counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor will prepare a report of pertinent facts and recommendations for action in consultation with the Vocational Rehabilitation Panel.
( 3 ) Action will be taken to terminate the eligible person's course at the proper time so that his or her entitlement may be conserved when the counseling psychologist or vocational rehabilitation counselor determines that: ( i ) The eligible person is progressing much faster than anticipated, and
( ii ) The eligible person's course may be terminated with satisfactory results before the time originally planned.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3520, 3541, 3543, 3561)
[48 FR 37973, Aug. 22, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 42726, Oct. 24, 1984; 73 FR 2425, Jan. 15, 2008]