alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY of HOT SPRINGS et al *v.*McGEORGE CONTRACTING COMPANY, Inc. et al

76-317

543 S.W. 2d 475

Opinion delivered November 15, 1976 (In Banc)

*Eudox Patterson,*for appellants.

*E. Harley Cox, Jr.,*of *Coleman, Gantt, Ramsey & Cox,*and *Bill S. Clark,*of *Smith, Williams, Friday, Eldredge & Clark,*for appellees.

*637George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an attempt by the city of Hot Springs and its airport commission to appeal from an order of dismissal entered on June 14, 1976. Our clerk refused to file the record, because the notice of appeal was not filed until July 15 — the 31st day after the entry of the order. The appellants argue that the belated filing was excusable, because the order was signed and filed without notice to counsel, and the clerk of the trial court failed to mail a copy to the appellants’ attorney, as is the custom of that office.

We cannot grant the relief sought, because the timely filing of a notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction. *Ward*v. *Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.,*228 Ark. 275, 307 S.W. 2d 73 (1957); *General Box Co.*v. *Scurlock,*223 Ark. 967, 271 S.W. 2d 40 (1954). We must therefore deny the appellants’ motion, without prejudice, however, to an application to the trial court for relief. Cf. *Karam*v. *Halk,*260 Ark. 36, 537 S.W. 2d 797 (1976).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Readout of Deputy Secretary Brian P. McKeon Meetings in Atlanta and Clarkston, Georgia

# 									Readout of Deputy Secretary Brian P. McKeon Meetings in Atlanta and Clarkston, Georgia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 25, 2021

On Thursday, June 24, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian P. McKeon traveled to Atlanta and Clarkston, Georgia, along with Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Senior Bureau Official Nancy Izzo Jackson, and met with resettlement agency staff including State Refugee Coordinator Michael Singleton and state and local officials including Mayor of Clarkston Beverly Burks and DeKalb County Commissioners Ted Terry and Lorraine Cochran-Johnson.  The Deputy Secretary also met with refugee services partners including  the Coalition of Refugee Service Agencies (CRSA), Georgia Welcoming Co-Op, Refugee Women Network, Global Village Project (GVP), Positive Growth, the Center for Victims of Torture, as well as other education, employment, and medical specialists.

Deputy Secretary McKeon discussed the integral role of resettlement agency staff in the welcoming process for new refugee arrivals, the resources necessary to re-build the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), the integral role local communities play in ensuring the successful integration of refugees, and the valuable contributions refugees make to their new communities and economies.

Deputy Secretary McKeon also greeted newly arrived refugees, spoke with resettled refugees about their experiences arriving to their new communities, and underscored the United States’ deep commitment to supporting refugees in the U.S. and around the world.

For further information, please contact PRM at prmpress@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesGeorgiaOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelRefugees

Back to Top
#### § 2.4 Delegation of authority to order paid advertising for use in recruitment.

Paid advertisements may be used in recruitment for VA competitive and excepted service positions. Authority to order such advertisements is hereby delegated to Administration Heads, Assistant Secretaries, Other Key Officials (the General Counsel; the Inspector General; the Chairman, Board of Veterans' Appeals; and the Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization), Deputy Assistant Secretaries, to the deputies of such officials, to the Deputy Assistant Secretary and Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources Management, and to field facility Directors.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 302(b)(2); 44 U.S.C. 3702)

[61 FR 20134, May 6, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 65462, Nov. 21, 2007]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2324 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2324

To require each Federal agency to include its address and phone number 
                       on any agency stationery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2007

  Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. David Davis of 
 Tennessee, Mr. Paul, and Mr. Conaway) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require each Federal agency to include its address and phone number 
                       on any agency stationery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Contact Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES TO INCLUDE ADDRESSES AND PHONE 
              NUMBERS ON AGENCY STATIONERY.

    (a) Requirement.--Each Federal agency shall include its address and 
phone number on any agency stationery. In the case of correspondence 
originating from a regional or local office of a Federal agency, the 
agency shall include the address and phone number of the regional or 
local office on the stationery.
    (b) Agency Definition.--In this Act, the term ``Federal agency'' 
has the meaning provided the term ``Executive agency'' by section 105 
of title 5, United States Code.
    (c) Exception for National Security.--Subsection (a) shall not 
apply in any case in which compliance with such subsection would not be 
in the national security interests of the United States, as determined 
by the head of the agency.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>                         
                                IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.

                    Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Earnings


<CAPTION>
                        For the Quarter Ended March 31, 1998


QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998:                                                                         
                                                                                   Basic               Diluted
                                                                                  ----------            ----------
<S>                                                                               <C>                   <C>
Weighted Average Number of Shares
        Average common shares outstanding at March 31, 1998                       44,838,904            44,838,904
        Dilutive Effect for stock options at March 31, 1998                              -                 671,912
                                                                                  ----------            ----------
        Adjusted weighted average shares at March 31, 1998                        44,838,904            45,510,816
                                                                                  ==========            ==========

Net income to be used to compute  
   diluted earnings per share                                                          (Dollars in thousands)

       Net income                                                                    $25,337               $25,337
                                                                                  ==========            ==========

Earnings per share                                                                     $0.57                 $0.56
                                                                                  ==========            ==========



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:
August 10, 2009





By:
              /s/ Daniel BernsteinDaniel
      Bernstein, Presidentand
      Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.839 Incorporation by reference.

(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the USPTO and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact the USPTO's Office of Patent Legal Administration at 571-272-7701. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov* or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.* The material may be obtained from the source(s) in paragraph (b) of this section.

(b) World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 34 chemin des Colombettes, 1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland, *www.wipo.int.*

(1) WIPO Standard ST.26. WIPO Handbook on Intellectual Property Information and Documentation, Standard ST.26: Recommended Standard for the Presentation of Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Listings Using XML (eXtensible Markup Language) including Annexes I-VII, version 1.7, approved December 8, 2023; IBR approved for §§ 1.831 through 1.834.

(2) [Reserved]

[87 FR 30818, May 20, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 34091, May 26, 2023; 89 FR 36679, May 3, 2024]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 12, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00440

- CR

Ronald GUILLORY

, JR

. , Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1991CR4522

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appella nt filed a notice of appeal in which he provides he is appealing an order signed on

May 4, 1992. The clerk’s record contains an o rder altering and a mending the co nditions of

probation signed on September 3, 1992. This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an

appeal from an order altering or modifying c ommunity supervision conditions. Davis v.

State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“There is no legislative authority for

entert aining a direct appeal from an order modifying the conditions of community supervision.”) ;

Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112,

113 (Tex. App.

— S an Antonio 1995, no pet.).

In addition, the notice of appeal

— filed on June 25, 2018

— is untimely. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)

. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this c ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See

Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam); Olivo v. State , 918

S.W.2d 519, 522 (T ex. Crim. App. 1996).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction by Augu s t 13, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
§ 21.5701 Establishment of educational assistance test program. ( a ) *Establishment.* The Departments of Army, Navy and Air Force have established an educational assistance test program. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141(a))
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this program is to encourage enlistments and reenlistments for service on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States during the period from October 1, 1980, through September 30, 1981. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141(a))
( c ) *Funding.* The Department of Defense is bearing the costs of this program. Participants in the program do not bear any of the costs.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2141(a))
§ 21.7801 Delegation of authority. ( a ) *General delegation of authority.* Except as otherwise provided, authority is delegated to the Under Secretary for Benefits of VA, and to supervisory or adjudication personnel within the jurisdiction of the Education Service of VA designated by the Under Secretary for Benefits to make findings and decisions under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606 and the applicable regulations, precedents and instructions concerning the program authorized by that chapter to the extent that the program is administered by VA. (Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 512(a); Pub. L. 98-525)
( b ) *Other delegations of authority.* In administering benefits payable under 10 U.S.C. chapter 1606, VA shall apply § 21.4001(b), (c)(1), (2), and (3) (in part), and (f) in the same manner as those paragraphs are applied in the administration of 38 U.S.C. chapter 34.
(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 16136(b), 38 U.S.C. 512(a); 3696; Pub. L. 98-525)
[53 FR 34740, Sept. 8, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 20729, May 8, 1996; 61 FR 29483, June 11, 1996]
#### § 18b.25 Certificate of service.

The original of every document filed and required to be served upon parties to a proceeding shall be endorsed with a certificate of service signed by the party making service or by the party's attorney or representative, stating that such service has been made, the date of service, and the manner of service, whether by mail or personal delivery.

[35 FR 10760, July 2, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 10386, Mar. 26, 1986]
§ 20.300 Rule 300. General. ( a ) Decisions of the Board will be based on a de novo review of the evidence of record at the time of the agency of original jurisdiction decision on the issue or issues on appeal, and any additional evidence or testimony submitted pursuant to this subpart, as provided in § 20.801.
( b ) *Waiver of appellant's right to submit evidence.* For appeals described in 20.302 and 20.303, an appellant has a right to submit evidence during a period of 90 days, unless this right is waived by the appellant or representative at any time prior to the expiration of the applicable 90-day period. Such a waiver must be in writing or, if a hearing on appeal is conducted pursuant to 20.302, the waiver must be formally and clearly entered on the record orally at the time of the hearing.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7104)
[84 FR 182, Jan. 18, 2019]
George Faris

17463 West Caribbean Lane

Surpr i se, Arizona 85388

Dear Sir or Madam:

This petition is being submitted on my behalf without legal counsel or consulting services. Pursuant to Section 333

of the FAA Modernization a nd Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, George Faris , a freelance multimedia producer, hereby applies for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs)

listed below to allow operation of our Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) commercially in airspace regulated

by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) so long as such operations are conducted with and under the

conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

The request ed exemption would permit George Faris to operate my Yuneec Typhoon Q500 + quadcopter and

pursue his commercial interests in providing services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial

cinematography, aerial filming and photogra phy for real estate, construction firms, special events to include but
not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, and promotional events

.

George Faris stat es that all UAV/UAS flights may occur over public, private or controlled access property and will

do so , if possible, with the propert y owner's consent and knowledge. George Faris has demonstrated the ability to

safely and effectively fly the UAV/UAS Yuneec Typhoon Q500 + which will be used for all commercial and private

purposes. George Faris complies with local ordinances and laws regarding the ope ration of UAV/UAS , and adheres

to all weather and environmental restrictions or limitations in reference to the operations of UAV/UAS

.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, Geor ge Faris will conduct a Pre

- Flight Safety Inspection. Only the

manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all repairs. The UAV/UAS will only be

operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown n ear airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident
that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

Regulations from which exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21
14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.205(b)

14 C.F.R. 91.215

14 C.F.R. 91.401

- 91.417

I have included the Yuneec Typhoon Q500+ user manual. And I thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully,

George Faris
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comm Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Scott A.
Seasock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, aS adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: August 12, 2003                  /s/ Scott A. Seasock
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Scott A. Seasock
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written Statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       51
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 127/2005 of 27 January 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 20/2002 laying down detailed rules for implementing the specific supply arrangements for the outermost regions introduced by Council Regulations (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001 and (EC) No 1454/2001

(Official Journal of the European Union L 25 of 28 January 2005)

On page 12, in Article 1(2):

for:

‘2.   The title of Chapter VI and Articles 16, 17 and 18 are replaced by the following:’,

read:

‘2.   Chapter VI shall be replaced by the following:’;

on page 13, in Article 16(1)(c):

for:

               ‘quantities of products which have been exempt from import duties and which are re-dispatched shall be re-attributed to the forecast supply balance and the amount of the erga omnes import duties applicable is paid by the dispatcher at the latest at the time of re-dispatching;’,

read:

               ‘quantities of products which have been exempt from import duties and which are re-dispatched shall be re-attributed to the forecast supply balance and the amount of the erga omnes import duties applicable at the day of importation is paid by the dispatcher at the latest at the time of re-dispatching;’.

----
41759.

#### VEASEY v. THE STATE.

Submitted January 5, 1966

Decided January 11, 1966

Rehearing denied January 19, 1966.

*Casey Thigpen,*for appellant.

*Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor,*for appellee.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant, under an accusation charging him with the illegal sale of nontax-paid liquor, was tried and convicted in the City Court of Washington County. He appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence. *Held:*

The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of selling nontax-paid liquor, and the charge of the court that “it is contrary to the laws of the state to sell nontax-paid liquor” was not error as contended in the defendant’s enumeration of error. *Morris v. State,*100 Ga. App. 457 (111 SE2d 655); *Bobo v. State,*101 Ga. App. 266 (113 SE2d 468); *Echols v. State,*94 Ga. App. 898 (96 SE2d 521).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
§ 21.6521 Employment of qualified veterans. ( a ) *Provisions of the IEAP (Individualized Employment Assistance Plan).* Each IEAP of a qualified veteran shall require that the: ( 1 ) Case manager maintain close contact with qualified veterans who become employed to help assure adjustment to employment;
( 2 ) Veteran discuss any plan to leave employment during the trial work period with the case manager. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163(c))
( b ) *Coordination with the Veterans Service Center.* The VR&E Division will inform the Veterans Service Center in writing upon employment of the participating qualified veteran during a program of either vocational rehabilitation services or counseling and employment services and when such employment has continued for 12 consecutive months. See § 3.343(c)(2) of this title.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163(a))
[51 FR 19333, May 29, 1986. Redesignated at 53 FR 4397, Feb. 16, 1988, as amended at 71 FR 28587, May 17, 2006]