alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated   balance  sheet,   consolidated   statement  of  operations,   and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period  ending June 30,  1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                             $ 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             Jun-01-1998
<CASH>                                         6,697
<SECURITIES>                                  70,996
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21,509
<PP&E>                                        69,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                37,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               133,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,667
<BONDS>                                       33,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          38
<OTHER-SE>                                    78,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 133,572
<SALES>                                       13,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              43,885
<CGS>                                          7,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 40,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               11,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           11,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  11,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.30
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, D. Gary McRae, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
13

 

   affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: June 24, 2005   /s/D. Gary McRae     D. Gary McRae  President and CEO  
14
#### EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF SKINNER & EDDY CORPORATION, PETITIONER

[58 C. Cls. 663; 265 U. S. 86]

Rule on the Court of Claims directing it to show cause why it should not be required by mandamus, or by prohibition, to restore an order dismissing a suit, to set aside another vacating the first, and to abstain from attempting eKercise of further jurisdiction in the case. The Supreme Court decided:

1. The right of a plaintiff to dismiss a suit, if it exists, is absolute, independent of the reasons offered and not affected by concealment or misstatement of reasons.

2. The rule of the Federal courts at law and in equity, governing the right of a plaintiff to dismiss without prejudice should obtain in the Court of Claims.

3. A plaintiff in the Court of Claims may dismiss without prejudice when the Government has filed no counterclaim, and will not be prejudiced, legally, by the dismissal.

4. Where a plaintiff, after dismissing its suit in the Court of Claims, began a suit in a State court against tlie Shipping Board on the same cause of action, which remained pending, *held,*that the subject matter was withdrawn from the cognizance of the Court of Claims by Judicial Code, section 154, and that it could not resume its jurisdiction by sett.ng aside the dismissal retroactively.

5. An order of the Court of Claims attempting to reinstate a dismissed case in plain violation of the plaintiff’s right to dismiss it, and an effect of which would be to deprive the plaintiff of the right of trial by jury iii a State court, maybe corrected by mandamus.

Writ absolute.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered tlie opinion of the Supreme Court May 12, 1924.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7039

JULIUS J. GOLZ,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in 07-0159, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Julius J. Golz moves for an extension of time, until May 27, 2009, to file his

opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

Date

cc:	Sean A. Ravin, Esq.

Steven M. Mager, Esq.

s8

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

US. Getlinpre Fon

THE P MAL CI IT

MAY 7 2009

JAN

CLERK

MAY - 7 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly
#### Julius Brunnings, Respondent, *v.*Fred J. Bittner, Appellant.

Appeal by the tenant from a final order of the: Municipal ’Court, second district, borough of The Bronx, in favor of the petitioner.

*799E. J. Kelly, for appellant.

Henry K. Davis, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

All the material allegations in the petition being denied in the answer, and no evidence appearing in the record to support the allegations in the petition and the determination of the justice, the order must be reversed.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J., concur.

Order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, ITVA CONFLICTS.                    

*Date:*                         October 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Francois Boller, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513,                         *bollerf@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy

[FR Doc. E9-22973 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 404.6 Nonexclusive licenses.

Nonexclusive licenses may be granted under Government owned inventions without a public notice of a prospective license.

[71 FR 11513, Mar. 8, 2006]
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

Ex parte :

Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus

Inactivo de octubre y noviembre

de 2023 2023 TSPR 147

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: EM

- 2023

- 0014

Fecha: 20 de diciembre de 2023

Materia: Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de octubre y

noviembre de 2023.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del

proceso de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones

del Tribunal Supremo. Su distribución electróni ca se hace como un

servicio público a la comunidad.EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

Ex p arte:

Aprobación de Cambio de

Estatus Inactivo de

octubre y noviembre de 2023

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 20 de diciembre de 20 23

.

Durante el periodo de octubre y noviembre

de 2023

, este Tribunal autorizó el cambio a estatus

como Abogado(a) Inactivo(a) a los (as) abogados (as)

siguientes :

octubre 20 23

Concepción González, José 3,667

Santiago Rivera, Modesto 5,208

Mac L ean Morales , Carmen M. 5,319

Mangual Veléz, Damaris B. 5,695

Valcárcel Ríos, Cándido 6,015

Ramirez Lavandero, Mar í a 6,223

Ferrer Rodríguez , Maricarmen 7,221

Diaz Rodríguez , Jose R 7,704

Beauchamp De Jesus, Blanca 7,738

Gari Perez, Blanca 8,786

Vázquez Rodríguez, Anabelle 8,894

Rivera Gonz á lez, Esther M

. 12,280

Ufret Vincenty, María Del Pilar 14,283

Laborde Freyre, Luis J

. 14,937

EM

- 2023

- 00 1 4EM

- 20 23

- 0014 2

Vivaldi Candal, Michelle Cristina 20,969

Gavilanes Méndez, Felipe Eduardo 21,100

noviembre 20 23

Quiñones Artau, Federico 7,189

Landrón Sandín, Ángel M. 8,143

Machado Ortiz, Richard 13,405

Publíquese.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretari o del

Tribunal Supremo

.

Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.106 Filing date.

(a) *Complete petition.* A petition to institute *inter partes* review will not be accorded a filing date until the petition satisfies all of the following requirements:

(1) Complies with § 42.104;

(2) Effects service of the petition on the correspondence address of record as provided in § 42.105(a); and

(3) Is accompanied by the fee to institute required in § 42.15(a).

(b) *Incomplete petition.* Where a party files an incomplete petition, no filing date will be accorded, and the Office will dismiss the petition if the deficiency in the petition is not corrected within one month from the notice of an incomplete petition.
Specimen Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.3 
  

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 APRIL 26, 1996 
  

	NUMBER	 	SHARES

  
 NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.

  

	50,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK	 	2,000,000 SHARES PREFERRED STOCK
	$.001 PAR VALUE EACH	 	$.001 PAR VALUE EACH

  
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                          IS THE
REGISTERED HOLDER OF                  Shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC. 
  
 Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
  
 In Witness
Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed 
  
 this        day of
                         A.D.         . 
  

	  

	  	[SEAL]	 	  


	SECRETARY	  	 	 	CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

  
 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”) OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN ACQUIRED WITH A VIEW TO DISTRIBUTION OR RESALE, AND MAY NOT BE
SOLD, EXCHANGED, MORTGAGED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT (A) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR SUCH SECURITIES UNDER THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE LAWS OR TO THE EXTENT THAT REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION IS NOT
REQUIRED UNDER SUCH ACT OR UNDER APPLICABLE STATE LAWS OR (B) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION THEREFROM UNDER SAID ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES OR “BLUE SKY” LAWS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE COMPANY MAY, UPON REQUEST, REQUIRE A
SATISFACTORY OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PURCHASER THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT. 
  
 REFER TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, BYLAWS AND AGREEMENTS ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR FURTHER RESTRICTIONS. THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE
ALSO SUBJECT TO A REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MARCH 12, 2003. COPIES OF SUCH AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE WITH AND MAY BE INSPECTED AT THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION. THE HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE, BY ACCEPTANCE OF IT,
AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THE PROVISIONS OF SUCH AGREEMENTS.
§ 17.277 Appeals. ( a ) This section applies only to legacy claims.
( b ) Notice of the initial determination regarding payment of CHAMPVA benefits will be provided to the CHAMPVA beneficiary on a CHAMPVA Explanation of Benefits (EOB) form. The EOB form is generated by the CHAMPVA automated payment processing system. If a CHAMPVA beneficiary or provider disagrees with the determination concerning CHAMPVA-covered services and supplies or calculation of benefits, he or she may request reconsideration. Such requests must be submitted to VA in writing within one year of the date of the initial determination. The request must state why the CHAMPVA claimant believes the decision is in error and must include any new and relevant information not previously considered. Any request for reconsideration that does not identify the reason for dispute will be returned to the claimant without further consideration. After reviewing the claim and any relevant supporting documentation, VA will issue a written determination to the claimant that affirms, reverses, or modifies the previous decision. If the claimant is still dissatisfied, within 90 days of the date of the decision he or she may make a written request for review by VA. After reviewing the claim and any relevant supporting documentation, VA will issue a written determination to the claimant that affirms, reverses, or modifies the previous decision. The decision of VA with respect to benefit coverage and computation of benefits is final. When a CHAMPVA beneficiary has other health insurance (OHI), an appeal must first be filed with the OHI, and a determination made, before submitting the appeal to CHAMPVA with limited exceptions such as if the OHI deems the issue non-appealable. Denial of CHAMPVA benefits based on legal eligibility requirements may be appealed to the Board of Veterans' Appeals in accordance with 38 CFR part 20. Medical determinations are not appealable to the Board. 38 CFR 20.101.
[87 FR 41603, July 13, 2022]
§ 56.402 Application. To be approved by the Secretary under this subpart, an application for a grant must, in addition to meeting the requirements of § 56.104 of subpart A of this part, ( a ) Be submitted by an entity which the Secretary determines intends to become a migrant health center but which will not, at the time of the grant award, meet one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (l) of § 56.303 of subpart C of this part; and
( b ) Contain information sufficient to enable the Secretary to determine that the project for which the grant is sought will meet the requirements of this part. Such information must include a plan which identifies which requirements of § 56.303 will not be met at the time of grant award and provides a timetable for and a detailed statement of the means to be employed in meeting those requirements.
§ 0.735-12 Standards of conduct in special areas. ( a ) *Safety.* ( 1 ) Employees will observe safety instructions, signs, and normal safety practices and precautions, including the use of protective clothing and equipment.
( 2 ) An employee shall report each work-connected injury, accident or disease he or she suffers.
( b ) *Furnishing testimony.* Employees will furnish information and testify freely and honestly in cases respecting employment and disciplinary matters. Refusal to testify, concealment of material facts, or willfully inaccurate testimony in connection with an investigation or hearing may be ground for disciplinary action. An employee, however, will not be required to give testimony against himself or herself in any matter in which there is indication that he or she may be or is involved in a violation of law wherein there is a possibility of self-incrimination.
| | Property Underwriting Manual | 
| | ---------------------------- |
#### John Henry KAY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 76-131

543 S.W. 2d 479

Opinion delivered November 22, 1976

*Harold L. Hall,*Public Defender, by: *William R. Simpson,*Dep. Public Defender, for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Terry R. Kirkpatrick,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

John Henry Kay appeals from a verdict and judgment sentencing him to five years’ imprisonment for robbery and to two additional years for committing the offense with a firearm. We find no merit in the two points for reversal that are presented.

*682The victim of the robbery, Khachia Muradain, who was employed in his son’s liquor store, speaks Armenian but not English. The son, who was not present when the robbery occurred and who did not testify, acted as the interpreter when his father testified for the State. Defense counsel objected to that procedure, on the ground that the son was biased, and also asked for a mistrial.

No prejudicial error is shown. The son had had some earlier experience as an interpreter, but he was evidently not skilled in that role. Occasionally he interposed remarks of his own instead of confining himself to the attorneys’ questions and to the witness’s answers. His remarks, however, had no direct bearing on the merits of the case. Any impropriety in the procedure could readily have been corrected by an admonition to the jury, but the court was not asked to take that action. In the circumstances the request for a mistrial was properly denied. *Back*v. *Duncan,*246 Ark. 494, 438 S.W. 2d 690 (1969). Moreover the questions and answers were recorded on tape so that the son’s accuracy as an interpreter could have been checked later on, but that step does not appear to have been thought necessary.

It is also argued that the accused was denied his right to a speedy trial. Kay was in prison in Louisiana when the information was filed, but eventually he waived extradition and consented to being brought to Arkansas for trial. Having waived extradition he is not in a position to, and does not, question the extradition procedure. He does assert, however, that the State was required to exercise good faith in seeking his return to Arkansas. *Smith*v. *Hooey,*393 U.S. 374 (1969). From that premise he argues that the State’s good faith is rebutted by its use of certain “pre-notarized” documents in the extradition proceedings and that therefore he was denied a speedy trial. This argument is not sound. We cannot approve the use of such documents, but we fail to see how their use implies a lack of good faith as far as a speedy trial is concerned. To the contrary, presumably the documents were used to hasten Kay’s return to Arkansas rather than to retard it. Consequently no prejudice from their use appears.

Affirmed.

*683We agree. Harris, C.J., and Fogleman and Jones, JJ.