alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.516 Disclosure of information to undertaker concerning burial of a deceased veteran.

When an undertaker requests information believed to be necessary in connection with the burial of a deceased veteran, such as the name and address of the beneficiary of the veteran's Government insurance policy, name and address of the next of kin, rank or grade of veteran and organization in which he or she served, character of the veteran's discharge, or date and place of birth of the veteran, and it appears that the undertaker is holding the body awaiting receipt of the information requested, the undertaker, in such instances, may be considered the duly authorized representative of the deceased veteran for the purpose of obtaining said information. In ordinary cases, however, the undertaker will be advised that information concerning the beneficiary of a Government insurance policy is confidential and cannot be disclosed; the beneficiary will be advised immediately of the inquiry, and the furnishing of the desired information will be discretionary with the beneficiary. In no case will the undertaker be informed of the net amount due under the policy or furnished information not specifically mentioned in this paragraph.

[46 FR 62059, Dec. 22, 1981]
1

On October 30, 1992, the President signed into law the

Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of

1992 (Public Law 102-575), which included Title XXXIV, the

Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA). The CVPIA

amends previous authorizations of the California Central

Valley Project (CVP) to include fish and wildlife protection,

restoration, and mitigation as project purposes having

equal priority with irrigation and domestic water supply

uses, and fish and wildlife enhancement having an equal

priority with power generation.

This document summarizes the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) which addresses the

potential impacts of implementation of the Central Valley

Project Improvement Act. The PEIS was prepared pursuant

to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by the U.S.

Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service (Service) for the Department of the

Interior.

Central Valley Project Water Facilities

The CVP is one of the largest water storage and conveyance

systems in the world. The project includes 20 dams and

reservoirs capable of storing 11 million acre-feet of water,

11 power plants, 500 miles of major canals and aqueducts,

three fish hatcheries, and various related facilities. The CVP

conveys about 20 percent of the state’s developed water

from the Sacramento, Trinity, American, Stanislaus, and San

Joaquin rivers to agricultural and municipal water users

and wildlife refuges in the Sacramento and San Joaquin

valleys and the San Francisco Bay Area.

The CVP operations affect the Sacramento-San Joaquin

Delta. These operations must be coordinated with the State

Water Project (SWP), which also conveys water through the

Delta. The SWP conveys water from the Feather River to

SWP agricultural and municipal water service contractors

and water rights contractors in the Sacramento and San

Joaquin valleys, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the Central

and Southern California Coastal areas.

The CVP and SWP are operated in accordance with their

respective water rights permits and licenses administered

by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).

Operation of the two projects is managed through the

Coordinated Operating Agreement (COA). The CVP and

SWP, under their water rights permits, are required to meet

water quality standards and the needs of senior water

rights holders. Under the existing Biological Opinions

issued under authority of the Federal Endangered Species

Act, the two projects must also operate in a manner that is

not likely to jeopardize the endangered winter-run chinook

salmon and threatened Delta smelt.

Introduction
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of QMed Inc. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael W. Cox, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and William T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant toss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Michael W. Cox
-------------------------
Michael W. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2004



/s/  William T. Schmitt, Jr.
---------------------------------
William T. Schmitt, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to QMed Inc. and will be retained by QMed Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### CHICAGO COLD STORAGE WAREHOUSE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

[57 C. Cls. 220; 263 U. S. 677]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the Supreme Court, on October 15, 1923, decided:

*Per curiam:*

*Affirmed*upon the authority of *Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co.*v. *United*States, 261 U. S. 592; *United States*v. *North American Transportation*Co., 253 U. S. 330, 333.
§ 17.3102 Eligibility. The following individuals are eligible for HISA benefits: ( a ) A veteran who is eligible for medical services under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a).
( b ) A servicemember who is undergoing medical discharge from the Armed Forces for a permanent disability that was incurred or aggravated in the line of duty in the active military, naval, or air service. A servicemember would be eligible for HISA benefits while hospitalized or receiving outpatient medical care, services, or treatment for such permanent disability.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of QMed, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2003 (the "Report"), I, William
T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ William T. Schmitt, Jr.
---------------------------
William T. Schmitt, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2003
|   | (i) | the      quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      September 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      4, 2009 |   |   | /s/HENRY C. PAO                              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |   | Henry      C. Pao, Ph.D.                     |
|                                    |   |   | President      & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)           |
§ 62.75 Will individuals serving under the Special Repayment Program receive credit for partial service? ( a ) With respect to obligations under the Scholarship Program, a credit will be allowed for partial service under the Special Repayment Program and will result in a reduction of the Program participant's financial obligation in accordance with the following formula: In which: ‘A’ is the amount the United States is entitled to recover; ‘0’ is the sum of the amounts paid to or on behalf of the Program participant under the Scholarship Program and the interest on such amounts which would be payable if, at the time the amounts were paid, they were loans bearing interest at the maximum legal prevailing rate, as determined by the Treasurer of the United States; ‘t’ is the sum of (1) the number of months of prior approved service plus (2) the number of months of the Program participant's period of obligated service under the Program including any additional months of service incurred pursuant to section 204(c)(2) of Pub. L. 100-177; ‘s’ is the number of months of prior approved service performed by the Program participant before commencing service under this Program; and ‘r’ is the number of months of service performed by the Program participant in compliance with this Program. However, where a judgment has been entered against a Program participant, the formula will be revised such that: ‘30’ is the amount of the judgment representing the Program participant's liability under the Scholarship Program, including any accrued post judgment interest and excluding any monetary payments on the judgment which may have been made by the Program participant; ‘t’ is the sum of (1) the number of months of prior approved service performed by the Program participant after entry of the judgment but before commencing service under this Program plus (2) the number of months of the Program participant's period of obligated service under the Program including any additional months of service incurred pursuant to section 204(c)(2) of Pub. L. 100-177; and ‘s’ is the number of months of prior approved service performed by the Program participant after the entry of the judgment but before commencing service under this Program.
( b ) With respect to obligations under the PH/NHSC Scholarship Training Program, if a Program participant fails to complete the period of obligated service under the Program (including any additional months of service incurred pursuant to section 204(c)(1) of Pub. L. 100-177), no credit for partial service under this Program will be allowed.
( c ) Where participants have obligations under both the Scholarship Program and the PH/NHSC Scholarship Training Program, credit for service will be applied against the scholarship obligations in the order in which they were incurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1997, AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,302,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,073,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,762,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,708,000
<PP&E>                                      12,700,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,977,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,825,000
<BONDS>                                     60,741,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,520,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,977,000
<SALES>                                     25,814,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        9,605,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,718,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (49,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,635,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                510,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            510,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   510,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Property, plant and equipment net of accumulated depreciation.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6288** 

LAMONT DELMAR PARKER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

SHERIFF JAMES KNIGHT; JAIL ADMINISTRATOR G. BULLOCK , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:10

- ct

- 03095

- D )

Submitted : July 31, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lamont Delmar Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Baxter Bradburn, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preceden t in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Lamont Delmar Parker appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (1) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affir m for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Knight , No.

5:10

- ct

- 03095

- D (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2011) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 38A/15 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 38A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4815 February 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 38A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4815 February 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| | |
| 2005/C 038A/2 | Corrigendum to the Directorate-General Trade — publication of a vacancy notice for Deputy Director-General (grade A*15) COM/2005/268 (OJ C 28 A of 4.2.2005) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2005/C 038A/2

Corrigendum to the Directorate-General Trade — publication of a vacancy notice for Deputy Director-General (grade A*15) COM/2005/268 (OJ C 28 A of 4.2.2005)

OJ C 28 A of 4.2.2005

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 21.3043 Suspension of program; child. For an eligible person who suspends his program due to conditions determined by the Department of Veterans Affairs to have been beyond his or her control the period of eligibility may, upon his request, be extended by the number of months and days intervening the date the suspension began and the date the reason for suspension ceased to exist. The burden of proof is on the eligible person to establish that suspension of a program was due to conditions beyond his or her control. The period of suspension shall be considered to have ended as of the date of the person's first available opportunity to resume training after the condition which caused it ceased to exist. The following circumstances may be considered as beyond the eligible person's control: ( a ) While in active pursuit of a program of education he or she is appointed by the responsible governing body of an established church, officially charged with the selection and designation of missionary representatives, in keeping with its traditional practice, to serve the church in an official missionary capacity and is thereby prevented from pursuit of his or her program of studies.
( b ) Immediate family or financial obligations beyond his or her control require the eligible person to take employment, or otherwise preclude pursuit of his or her program.
( c ) Unavoidable conditions arising in connection with the eligible person's employment which preclude pursuit of his or her program.
( d ) Pursuit of his or her program is precluded because of the eligible person's own illness or illness or death in his or her immediate family.
( e ) Active duty, including active duty for training in the Armed Forces.
[41 FR 47929, Nov. 1, 1976]
Motions denied, Appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 25, 

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00680-CV

ALI CHOUDHRI, Appellant

V.

OSAMA ABDULLATIF, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-50232

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 31, 2023. The clerk’s record was 

filed October 17, 2023. The reporter’s record was filed October 30, 2023. No brief 

has been filed. On January 30, 2024, the court issued an order extending the time to 

file the brief to March 26, 2024. In that ruling, the court stated that no further 

extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed.

On March 27, 2024, we issued a notice stating that unless appellant filed a 
2

brief along with a motion requesting an extension of time on or before April 8, 2024, 

the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant did not file anything following that notice aside from motions 

requesting a further extension of time that were not accompanied by a brief and did 

not provide any exceptional circumstances that would support such an extension. 

Accordingly, we deny the motions and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Zimmerer.
§ 21.8072 Authorizing training, services, and assistance beyond the initial individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation. ( a ) *Extension of the duration of a vocational training program.* VA may authorize an extension of a vocational training program when necessary to provide additional training, services, and assistance to enable the child to achieve the vocational or employment goal identified before the end of the child's basic entitlement period, as stated in the individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation under § 21.8080. A change from one occupational objective to another in the same field or occupational family meets the criterion for prior identification in the individualized written plan of vocational rehabilitation. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(d)(2), (e)(2), 1814)
( b ) *Extensions for prior participants in the program.* ( 1 ) Except as paragraph (b)(2) of this section provides, VA may authorize additional training, limited to the use of remaining program entitlement including any allowable extension, for an eligible child who previously participated in vocational training under this subpart. The additional training must: ( i ) Be designed to enable the child to complete the prior vocational goal or a different vocational goal; and
( ii ) Meet the same provisions as apply to training for new participants.
( 2 ) An eligible child who has previously achieved a vocational goal in a vocational training program under this subpart may not receive additional training under paragraph (b)(1) of this section unless a CP or VRC sets aside the child's achievement of that vocational goal under § 21.8284. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(b) through (e), 1814)
( c ) *Responsibility for authorizing a program extension.* A CP or VRC may approve extensions of the vocational training program the child is pursuing up to the maximum program limit of 48 months if the CP or VRC determines that the child needs the additional time to successfully complete training and obtain employment, and the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The child has completed more than half of the planned training; and
( 2 ) The child is making satisfactory progress.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(d)(2), 1814)