alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2011 - 0588 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 074 - AD Helicopter Model: Robinson Helicopter Company Model R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, R22 Mariner, R44, and R44 II Helicopters Number of Helicopter s (U.S. Operators ): 2,690 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions specified by this AD are intended to provide more specific AD actions, to relieve the burdens associated with the before - each - flight check by changing it to a daily

check, to det ect blade skin debond, and to prevent blade failure and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $18,130 for a Model R22 blade $24,800 for a Model R44 blade Labor per Helicopter ( 3 x $ 8 5 /work- hour) (10 x $85/work - hour) $ 255 (to inspect 2 blades) $850 (to replace each unairworthy blade) Other (Explain) We estimate an average of 7 recurrent annual or 100 - hour inspections before blade retirement. Total Cost per Helicopter Total US Fleet Cost $ 5,024,800 ($4,801,650 to inspect all the blades 7 times; plus $94,900 to replace 5 of the Model R22 blades; plus $128,250 to replace 5 of the Model R44 blades ) . Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regul atory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer s : Eric D. Schrieber (regarding Model R22 helicopters) Fred Guerin (regarding Model R44 helicopters).
Petition for Exemption

John Jordan John Jordan Films 435 Eddy Lane Franklin, TN 37064

I, John Jordan , hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112

- 95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 3 Professional Quadcopter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construct ion firms, agricultural modeling, crop monitoring operations, aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and environmental studies

. The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my community will benefit them b y opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the use of l arger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS the same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre

Flight Safety Inspection. Any and all repairs will be performed only by the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property without the owners permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visua l line ofsight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA

can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Jase W. Robak, Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and Mr. Mike Lloyd Lloyd & Associates, all of whom have received Section 333 ex emptions for comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows: 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5); 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c); 14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2); 14C.F.R. 91.109(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.119; 14 C.F.R. 91.121; 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1); 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2}; 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual, Quick Start Guide, Safety Guide, and Intell igent Flight Battery Safety Guide.

I truly thank you for your consideration.Sincerely,

John Jordan, Owner John Jordan Films

http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional _Quick_Start_Guide_en.pdf http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional _User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Intelligent_Flight_Battery_ Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/ en/Safety_Guidelines_Disclai mer_en.pdf
§ 21.5001 Administration of benefits: 38 U.S.C. Chapter 32. ( a ) *Delegation of authority.* Except as otherwise provided, authority is delegated to the Under Secretary for Benefits and to supervisory or administrative personnel within the jurisdiction of the Education Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, designated by him or her to make findings and decisions under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 32 and the applicable regulations, precedents, and instructions, as to the program authorized by subpart G of this part. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 512(a))
( b ) *Administrative provisions.* In administering benefits payable under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 32, VA will apply the following sections: ( 1 ) Section 21.4002—Finality of decisions;
( 2 ) Section 21.4003 (except paragraphs (d) and (e))—Revision of decisions;
( 3 ) Section 21.4005—Conflicting interests;
( 4 ) Section 21.4006—False or misleading statements;
( 5 ) Section 21.4007—Forfeiture;
( 6 ) Section 21.4008—Prevention of overpayments; and
( 7 ) Section 21.4009—Overpayments; waiver or recovery.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3241(a), 3680, 3683, 3685, 3690, 6103)
[61 FR 29029, June 7, 1996]
#### § 203.1 General.

This information is furnished for the guidance of the public and in compliance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552. The rules contained in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records pertaining to themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under part 204 of this chapter. Requests for services for which the Copyright Act of 1976, title 17 of the United States Code, requires a fee are not processed under this part, but will be processed under the applicable regulations governing that service (including § 201.2 of this chapter). If the Copyright Office receives a request for services for which the Copyright Act requires a fee to be charged, the Office will notify the requester of the procedure established to obtain such services, and the applicable fees under § 201.3 of this chapter. Section 706(b) of the Copyright Act and the regulations issued under section 706(b) are not subject to FOIA. All information relating to proceedings of the Copyright Claims Board under chapter 15 of the Copyright Act is exempt from disclosure under FOIA, except for Copyright Claims Board determinations published on the Copyright Office website and related records and information published on that website.

[82 FR 9506, Feb. 7, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 46122, Aug. 18, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 235 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 235

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To allow for the renegotiation of the payment schedule of contracts 
  between the Secretary of the Interior and the Redwood Valley County 
                Water District, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEGOTIATION OF PAYMENT SCHEDULE.

    Section 15 of Public Law 100-516 (102 Stat. 2573) is amended as 
follows:
            (1) By amending paragraph (2) of subsection (a) to read as 
        follows:
            ``(2) If, as of January 1, 2006, the Secretary of the 
        Interior and the Redwood Valley County Water District have not 
        renegotiated the schedule of payment, the District may enter 
        into such additional non-Federal obligations as are necessary 
        to finance procurement of dedicated water rights and 
        improvements necessary to store and convey those rights to 
        provide for the District's water needs. The Secretary shall 
        reschedule the payments due under loans numbered 14-06-200-
        8423A and 14-06-200-8423A Amendatory and said payments shall 
        commence when such additional obligations have been financially 
        satisfied by the District. The date of the initial payment owed 
        by the District to the United States shall be regarded as the 
        start of the District's repayment period and the time upon 
        which any interest shall first be computed and assessed under 
        section 5 of the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 (43 

              

        U.S.C. 422a et seq.).''.
            (2) By striking subsection (c).

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2021072EN.01001801.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 January 2021 — Bezouaoui and HB Consultant v Commission

(Case T-478/18) (1)

(State aid - Construction plant driving safety training - Reimbursement of training by State-authorised collecting bodies (Organismes paritaires de collecte agréés, OPCAs) - Decision finding no State aid - Concept of State aid - Whether imputable to the State - Public control of resources)

(2021/C 72/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Hacène Bezouaoui (Avanne, France) and HB Consultant (Beure, France) (represented by: J.-F. Henrotte and N. Neyrinck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2018) 2075 final of 10 April 2018 on Case SA.46897 (2018/NN) — France presumed aid in respect of the funding of training for the certificat d’aptitude à la conduite d’engins de chantier en sécurité (Handling Equipment Safe Operation Certificate, CACES).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders HB Consultant and Mr Hacène Bezouaoui to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders HB Consultant and Mr Hacène Bezouaoui to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  First  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Allen
R. Christenson,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


August 14, 2002                             /s/Allen R. Christenson
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                      -21-
#### § 11.130 Where to file applications.

Application for payment of a matured certificate or a deceased veteran's certificate, accompanied by the adjusted service certificate, unless it is held in the Department of Veterans Affairs as collateral for a loan, must be forwarded to the Manager, Veterans Benefits Office, Washington, DC, 20421.
PUBLIC LAW 107–104—DEC. 27, 2001 115 STAT. 1001

Public Law 107–104

107th Congress

An Act

To amend chapter 90 of title 5, United States Code, relating to Federal longterm care insurance.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF AN ANNUITANT.

Paragraph (2) of section 9001 of title 5, United States Code,

is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(2) ANNUITANT.—The term ‘annuitant’ means—

‘‘(A) any individual who would satisfy the requirements

of paragraph (3) of section 8901 if, for purposes of such

paragraph, the term ‘employee’ were considered to have

the meaning given to it under paragraph (1) of this subsection; and

‘‘(B) any individual who—

‘‘(i) satisfies all requirements for title to an annuity

under subchapter III of chapter 83, chapter 84, or

any other retirement system for employees of the

Government (whether based on the service of such

individual or otherwise), and files application therefor;

‘‘(ii) is at least 18 years of age; and

‘‘(iii) would not (but for this subparagraph) otherwise satisfy the requirements of this paragraph.’’.

SEC. 2. PREEMPTION.

Section 9005 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS.—’’ before

‘‘The’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(b) PREMIUMS.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No tax, fee, or other monetary payment

may be imposed or collected, directly or indirectly, by any

State, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto

Rico, or by any political subdivision or other governmental

authority thereof, on, or with respect to, any premium paid

for an insurance policy under this chapter.

‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not be

construed to exempt any company or other entity issuing a

policy of insurance under this chapter from the imposition,

payment, or collection of a tax, fee, or other monetary payment

on the net income or profit accruing to or realized by such

entity from business conducted under this chapter, if that tax,

fee, or payment is applicable to a broad range of business

activity.’’.

Dec. 27, 2001

[H.R. 2559]

115 STAT. 1002 PUBLIC LAW 107–104—DEC. 27, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2559:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–235, Pt. 1 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107–128 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Oct. 30, considered and passed House.

Dec. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect as if

included in the enactment of section 1002 of the Long-Term Care

Security Act (Public Law 106–265; 114 Stat. 762).

Approved December 27, 2001.

5 USC 9001 note.
## Decisions

Decision Search

ALJ Decisions Pending Commission Review

Commission Briefing NoticesCommissioners' Monthly Case Activity ReportCommissioners' Monthly Docket ReportListing of New Cases Received

Significant Orders - Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)Significant Orders - Commission
#### § 20.1402 Rule 1402. Inapplicability of other rules.

Motions filed under this subpart are not appeals and, except as otherwise provided, are not subject to the provisions of part 19 of this title or this part 20 which relate to the processing and disposition of appeals.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/21 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the 2014 – 29th Annual SME Regional Phosphate

Conference **SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the 2014 – 29th Annual SME Regional Phosphate Conference 

### on October 8 , 2014 , in Lakeland, Florida 

### . The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Beverly Banister/EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Karen Mort/Phoslab Environmental Services Approximately 60 participants **ATTACHMENT**
#### § 17.153 [Reserved]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Overseas Schools Advisory Council Meeting, Thursday, January 26, 2023

# 									Overseas Schools Advisory Council Meeting, Thursday, January 26, 2023							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 23, 2023

The Overseas Schools Advisory Council of the Department of State will hold its winter meeting on Thursday, January 26, 2023.  This meeting is open to the public for virtual participation only.  The meeting will focus on the work and support the Overseas Schools Advisory Council provides to U.S.-sponsored overseas schools.  Topics will include the Child Protection Project and the Social Emotional Learning Project.  In addition, the Regional Education Officers will present on various activities and initiatives in U.S.-sponsored overseas schools.

Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting virtually should contact Mr. Mark E. Ulfers, Executive Secretary of the Overseas Advisory Council of the Department of State at (202) 261-8200, by January 25 to receive the virtual platform instructions.  The public may take part in the discussion, time permitting and at the discretion of the chairperson.

For further information, please contact Joyce L Picado via email at PicadoJL@state.gov or by phone at 202-261-8203.

Tags

EducationEducation ProgramsOffice of Overseas SchoolsOffice of the SpokespersonOverseas SchoolsOverseas Schools Advisory Council

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22984]



[[Page 48567]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:
    License Number: 015131N.
    Name: Formosa International Freight Forwarder, Inc.
    Address: 20 West Lincoln Ave., Ste. 302, Valley Stream, NY 11580.
    Date Revoked: August 31, 2009.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021493NF.
    Name: Global Express Consolidators, Inc.
    Address: 2775 W. Okeechobee Rd., <greek-i>146, Hialeah, FL 33010.
    Date Revoked: September 4, 2009.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 019460NF.
    Name: USCA Forwarding-Seabell Express Inc.
    Address: 50 Harrison Street, Ste. 305, Hoboken, NJ 07030.
    Date Revoked: August 27, 2009.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E9-22984 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
§ 13.20 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this part: *Dependent* means a beneficiary's spouse as defined by this section, a beneficiary's child as defined by § 3.57 of this chapter, or a beneficiary's parent as defined by § 3.59 of this chapter, who does not have an income sufficient for reasonable maintenance and who obtains support for such maintenance from the beneficiary.
*Fiduciary* means an individual or entity appointed by VA to receive VA benefits on behalf of a beneficiary for the use and benefit of the beneficiary and the beneficiary's dependents.
*Hub Manager* means the individual who has authority to oversee the activities of a VA Fiduciary Hub or the Veterans Service Center Manager of the Manila, Philippines, VA Regional Office.
*In the fiduciary program* means, with respect to a beneficiary, that the beneficiary: ( 1 ) Has been rated by VA as incapable of managing his or her own VA benefits as a result of injury, disease, or the infirmities of advanced age;
( 2 ) Has been determined by a court with jurisdiction as being unable to manage his or her own financial affairs; or
( 3 ) Is less than the age of majority.
*Rating authority* means VA employees who have authority under § 3.353 of this chapter to determine whether a beneficiary can manage his or her VA benefits.
*Relative* means a person who is an adopted child or is related to a beneficiary by blood or marriage, as defined by this chapter.
*Restricted withdrawal agreement* means a written contract between VA, a fiduciary, and a financial institution in which the fiduciary has VA benefit funds under management for a beneficiary, under which certain funds cannot be withdrawn without the consent of the Hub Manager.
*Spouse* means a husband or wife whose marriage, including common law marriage and same-sex marriage, meets the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 103(c).
*VA benefit funds under management* means the combined value of the VA funds maintained in a fiduciary account or accounts managed by a fiduciary for a beneficiary under § 13.200 and any VA funds invested by the fiduciary for the beneficiary under § 13.210, to include any interest income and return on investment derived from any account.
*Written notice* means that VA will provide to the beneficiary and the beneficiary's representative and legal guardian, if any, a written decision in a fiduciary matter that is appealable under § 13.600. Such notice will include: ( 1 ) A clear statement of the decision,
( 2 ) The reason(s) for the decision,
( 3 ) A summary of the evidence considered in reaching the decision, and
( 4 ) The necessary procedures and time limits to initiate an appeal of the decision.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)