Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices 48907 

separate rate. See Preliminary Results, at 

74 FR at 31247. No information has 

been placed on the record of this 

segment of the proceeding since the 

Preliminary Results to contradict our 

preliminary separate–rate 

determination. Therefore, for the final 

results, we continue to determine that 

Fangjia is eligible for a separate rate. 

Final Results of the New Shipper 

Review 

The Department has determined that 

the following final dumping margin 

exists for the period January 1, 2008, 

through June 30, 2008: 

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM

THE PRC 

Exporter/Producer Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Shanghai Fangjia Industry Co., Ltd./Jiangsu 

Danyang Brilliant Furniture Co., Ltd. .......... 0.00 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. For 

importers/customers of the respondent 

where the respondent did not report 

entered values, we have calculated 

importer/customer–specific 

antidumping duty assessment amounts 

based on the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales of subject merchandise 

to the total quantity of subject 

merchandise sold in those transactions. 

For importers/customers of the 

respondent where the respondent 

reported entered values, we have 

calculated an ad valorem rate for that 

importer/customer by dividing the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated in the examined sales of 

subject merchandise by the total entered 

value of those transactions. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of NSR. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of NSR 

for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) 

for the exporter/producer combination 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rates shown for these companies; 

2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed PRC and non–PRC exporters 

not listed above that have separate rates, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the exporter–specific rate or 

combination rate published for the most 

recent period; 3) for all PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

PRC–wide rate of 216.01 percent; and 4) 

for all non–PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non–PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice to interested parties in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(2)(B), 751(a)(2)(C), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: September 16, 2009. 

Carole A. Showers, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy 

and Negotiations. 

[FR Doc. E9–23234 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–909 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), received on August 24, 

2009, meets the statutory and regulatory 

requirements for initiation. The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) of this new shipper 

review is January 23, 2008, - July 31, 

2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The antidumping duty order on 

certain steel nails from the PRC was 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 1, 2008. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel 

Nails From the People’s Republic of 

China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008) 

(‘‘Order’’). On August 24, 2009, we 

received a timely request for a new 

shipper review from Maanshan Leader 

Metal Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Maanshan 

Leader’’) in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(c) and 351.214(d)(2). Maanshan 

Leader has certified that it is both the 

producer and exporter of the subject 

merchandise upon which the request for 

the new shipper review is based. 

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

Maanshan Leader certified that it did 

not export certain steel nails to the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
48908 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices 

United States during the period of 

investigation (‘‘POI’’). Pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Maanshan 

Leader certified that, since the initiation 

of the investigation, it has never been 

affiliated with any exporter or producer 

who exported certain steel nails to the 

United States during the POI, including 

those not individually examined during 

the investigation. As required by 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), Maanshan Leader 

has also certified that its export 

activities are not controlled by the 

central government of the PRC. 

In addition to the certifications 

described above, Maanshan Leader 

submitted documentation establishing 

the following: (1) the date on which it 

first shipped certain steel nails for 

export to the United States and the date 

on which the certain steel nails first 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption; (2) the volume of its 

first shipment; and (3) the date of its 

first sales to an unaffiliated customer in 

the United States. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(ii) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we 

are initiating this new shipper review 

for shipments of certain steel nails from 

the PRC produced and exported by 

Maanshan Leader. 

We intend to issue preliminary results 

of this review no later than 180 days 

from the date of initiation, and final 

results of these reviews no later than 

270 days from the date of initiation. See 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

We will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to allow, at the option 

of the importer, the posting, until the 

completion of the review, of a bond or 

security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

each entry of the subject merchandise 

from Maanshan Leader in accordance 

with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.214(e). Because 

Maanshan Leader certified that it both 

produced and exported the subject 

merchandise, the sale of which is the 

basis for this new shipper review 

request, we will apply the bonding 

privilege to Maanshan Leader only for 

subject merchandise which Maanshan 

Leader both produced and exported. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. This initiation and notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: September 21, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–23246 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–552–801 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam, received on July 

31, 2009, meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation. 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) of this 

new shipper review is August 1, 2008, 

- July 31, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Javier Barrientos AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2243. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The antidumping duty order on 

certain frozen fish fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam was 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 12, 2003. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 

(August 12, 2003). On July 31, 2009, we 

received a timely request for a new 

shipper review from CUU Long Fish 

Joint Stock Company (‘‘CL–Fish’’) in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c) and 

351.214(d)(2). CL–Fish has certified that 

it is both the producer and exporter of 

the subject merchandise upon which the 

request for the new shipper review is 

based. 

Initiation of New Shipper Reviews 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2), CL– 

Fish certified that it did not export 

certain frozen fish fillets to the United 

States during the period of investigation 

(‘‘POI’’). Pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), CL–Fish certified 

that, since the initiation of the less– 

than-fair–value investigation, it has 

never been affiliated with any exporter 

or producer who exported certain frozen 

fish fillets to the United States during 

the POI, including those not 

individually examined during the less– 

than-fair–value investigation. As 

required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 

CL–Fish has also certified that its export 

activities are not controlled by the 

central government of Vietnam. 

In addition to the certifications 

described above, CL–Fish submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) the date on which it first 

shipped certain frozen fish fillets for 

export to the United States and the date 

on which the certain frozen fish fillets 

first entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption; (2) the 

volume of its first shipment; and (3) the 

date of its first sales to an unaffiliated 

customer in the United States. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are 

initiating this new shipper review for 

shipments of certain frozen fish fillets 

from Vietnam produced and exported 

by CL–Fish. 

We intend to issue preliminary results 

of this review no later than 180 days 

from the date of initiation, and final 

results of these reviews no later than 

270 days from the date of initiation. See 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

We will instruct the United States 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to allow, at the option of the importer, 

the posting, until the completion of the 

review, of a bond or security in lieu of 

a cash deposit for each entry of the 

subject merchandise from CL–Fish in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Because CL–Fish certified that it both 

produced and exported the subject 

merchandise, the sale of which is the 

basis for this new shipper review 

request, we will apply the bonding 

privilege to CL–Fish only for subject 

merchandise which the respondent both 

produced and exported. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. This initiation and notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES