alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Illinois Central R. R. Co. *v.*Burleson.

*Damage for Delay in Delivering Goods.*

(Decided May 9, 1912.

Rehearing denied May 28, 1912.

59 South. 230.)

*Appeal ancl Error; Decisions Reviewable; Void*Judgment.— Where the transcript shows that the summons and complaint were originally filed in the Justice Court in a cause in which the Circuit Court had no original jurisdiction, and fails to show any statement returned to the circuit court by the justice, or any judgment rendered by him or any appeal bond, and fails to indicate in any other way that the Circuit Court was exercising appellate jurisdiction, an appeal from such judgment will be dismissed because taken from a void judgment.

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon.

Action by W. T. Burleson against the Illinois Central Railroad Company for damages for failure to deliver freight. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Davis & Fite, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the assignments of error W/ith citation1, of authority, and on application for rehearing insist that the appeal bond Avas a sufficient transcript to give the circuit court jurisdiction to proceed Avith the trial, and that, therefore, the submission should be set aside and certiorari granted to bring up a proper *transcript.*— Hardee *v. Abraham,*183 Ala. 341.

E. B. & K. Y. Fite, for appellee.

Counsel discuss the assignments of error on the merits, but also insist that the appeal should be dismissed, because taken from a void *judgment.*— Gunter *v. Mason,*125 Ala. 644.

*385PELHAM, J.

The .transcript in this case shows that the summons and complaint filed in the circuit court was originally filed in the court of a justice of the peace. The amount claimed is below the original jurisdiction of the circuit court, but the transcript contains nothing showing that the circuit court was exercising appellate jurisdiction and trying the case de novo on appeal from a judgment rendered in the justice’s court.

The amount claimed by the appellee in the complaint ($20) is as damages for the failure of appellant' to deliver a cook stove delivered to it in- the due course, of business as a comman carrier. The transcript contains no statement returned to the clerk of the circuit court signed by the justice of the peace of the case or of any judgment rendered by him (Code §4716), nor does the transcript show an appeal bond. There is nothing in the transcript to show that the case was appealed from a judgment rendered by the justice, or that such a judgment was in fact rendered, and as the court is not shown to have been exercising appellate jurisdiction and was without original jurisdiction to act in the premises (Code, § 3255, subd. 1), there is no legal judgment to sustain the appeal, and a dismissal must be *ordered.*—Gunter *v. Mason,*125 Ala. 644, 27 South. 843.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 13.110 Supervised direct payment. ( a ) *Authority.* The Hub Manager may authorize the payment of VA benefits directly to an adult beneficiary in the fiduciary program who has reached the age of majority if the Hub Manager determines, based upon a field examination, that the beneficiary can manage his or her VA benefits with limited and temporary VA supervision. In making this determination, the Hub Manager will consider: ( 1 ) Whether the beneficiary is aware of his or her monthly income;
( 2 ) Whether the beneficiary is aware of his or her fixed monthly expenses such as rent, mortgage, utilities, clothing, food, and medical bills;
( 3 ) The beneficiary's ability to: ( i ) Allocate appropriate funds to fixed monthly expenses and discretionary items;
( ii ) Pay monthly bills in a timely manner; and
( iii ) Conserve excess funds; and
( 4 ) Any other information that demonstrates the beneficiary's actual ability to manage his or her VA benefits with limited VA supervision.
( b ) *Supervision.* The limited and temporary supervision of beneficiaries receiving direct payment under paragraph (a) of this section will consist of: ( 1 ) Assistance in the development of a budget regarding the beneficiary's income and expenses,
( 2 ) Assistance with creating a fund usage report to aid the beneficiary in tracking his or her income and expenses, and
( 3 ) Periodic reviews of the beneficiary's fund usage report, as required by the Hub Manager.
( c ) *Reassessment.* The Hub Manager will reassess the beneficiary's ability to manage his or her VA benefits at or before the end of the first 12-month period of supervision. Based upon a field examination, an evaluation of the factors listed in paragraph (a) of this section, and the results of the supervision prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, the Hub Manager will determine whether the beneficiary can manage his or her benefits without VA supervision. ( 1 ) If the beneficiary demonstrates the ability to manage his or her VA benefits without supervision, the Hub Manager will prepare a report that summarizes the findings and refer the matter with a recommendation and supporting evidence to the rating authority for application of § 3.353(b)(3) of this chapter regarding reevaluation of ability to manage VA benefits and § 3.353(d) of this chapter regarding the presumption of ability to manage VA benefits without restriction.
( 2 ) If the beneficiary does not demonstrate the ability to manage his or her VA benefits without VA supervision, the Hub Manager will: ( i ) Appoint a fiduciary, or
( ii ) Continue supervised direct payment for not longer than one additional 12-month period based upon evidence that additional supervision might assist the beneficiary in developing the ability to manage his or her own VA benefits. At the conclusion of the additional period of supervised direct payment, the Hub Manager will conduct the reassessment prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section and either recommend reevaluation under paragraph (c)(1) of this section or appoint a fiduciary under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5502)
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
HomeAssisted Schools...Rabat, Morocco: Rabat American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Rabat, Morocco: Rabat American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +212-537-758-590 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: info@ras.ma | Website: www.ras.ma 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Rabat 2024 Special Needs- Morocco) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**Rabat American School****(RAS)** was founded in 1962 as a private, non-profit, coeducational day school, which offers an American educational program from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school year begins in late August and ends in mid-June. The school calendar is based on a semester system with two reporting periods. RAS is accredited by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools and is authorized to offer the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program (IBDP).

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

 

Tags

MoroccoOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
11/29/2010 11:09 FAX 2024935142 FAA DMS 1001/001 

o 

U.S. Departmenl 

Of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of Rcsional Counsel 

November 10,2010 

Northwest Mountain Region 

Colorado, Idaho, Montana, 

Oregon, Utah, Washington, 

Wyoming 

Honorable Richard C. Ooodwin 

AdrmTiisti'atTvc Law Juclgc— 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room 5411 

U.S. Department of Transportaiion 

400 Seventh Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AOC-43 0 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suiic 2WI0O0 

Re: Peter Simons - 2009NM700173, CP10NM0004 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057 

Tel; (425)227-1417 

Tax: (425) 227-1007 

SCOTT.MORlUS.@FAA.GOV 

J O 

> ^ ^ 

V J J 

O 

^OlD'O^i ^ 

Dear Judge Goodwin: 

This is to infonn you that we have settled the above-referenced case. Therefore, we hereby 

withdraw our Complaint dated May 21, 2010. 

Sincerely, 

T S. WTTLIAMS 

Regional Counsel 

cc: Pete Simon,? and/or Gary Pollack 

2216 N. Farragut Avenue 

Colorado Springs, CO 80907
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                       486
<INVENTORY>                                      8,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,407
<PP&E>                                          22,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,448
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,367
<SALES>                                         36,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,230
<CGS>                                           19,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (6)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Relator. §

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00335

- CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the State ’s motion to dismiss petition for writ of

mandamus, and concludes that the State’ s motion should be granted and the petition for writ of

mandamus should be dismissed as moot. We therefore grant the State’s m otion and dismiss the

petition for writ of mandamus as moot, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Jus tice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 4.18


 


THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TRANSFERABLE


 


	
  Certificate Number C-1

  	
   

  	
  Number of Common Securities:  61,856

  



 


Certificate Evidencing Common Securities


 


of


 


SVB CAPITAL II


 


7% Common Securities

(liquidation amount $25 per Common Security)


 


SVB CAPITAL II, a statutory trust formed under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the “Trust”),
hereby certifies that SILICON VALLEY BANCSHARES (the “Holder”) is the
registered owner of Sixty-One Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Six (61,856) common
securities of the Trust representing undivided beneficial interests of the
Trust and designated the 7% Common Securities (liquidation amount $25 per
Common Security) (the “Common
Securities”).  In
accordance with Section 5.10 of the Trust Agreement (as defined below) the
Common Securities are not transferable and any attempted transfer hereof shall
be void.  The designations, rights,
privileges, restrictions, preferences and other terms and provisions of the
Common Securities are set forth in, and this certificate and the Common Securities
represented hereby are issued and shall in all respects be subject to the terms
and provisions of, the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of the Trust dated
as of October 30, 2003, (as the same may be amended, restated,
modified or otherwise supplemented from time to time, the “Trust  Agreement”) including
the designation of the terns of the Common Securities as set forth
therein.  The Trust will furnish a copy
of the Trust Agreement to the Holder without charge upon written request to the
Trust at its principal place of business or registered office.


 


Upon receipt of this certificate, the Holder is bound by the Trust
Agreement and is entitled to the benefits thereunder.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, an Administrative Trustee of the Trust has executed
this certificate this 30th day of October, 2003.


 


 


	
   

  	
  SVB CAPITAL II

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Paulette Mehas

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:  Paulette Mehas

  
	
   

  	
  Title:   Administrative
  Trustee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         4689706
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          390713
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6530000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    6188824
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         6628458
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           6622000
<LOANS>                                       37989496
<ALLOWANCE>                                     422629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                64490475
<DEPOSITS>                                    57345884
<SHORT-TERM>                                     87887
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             662911
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5784323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      609471
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                64490475
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2793181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               539532
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                166932
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3499645
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1269507
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1283634
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2216011
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    40000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2151469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 453705
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      314705
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    314705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.47
<LOANS-NON>                                    1044000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                635000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                390465
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   235807
<RECOVERIES>                                    227971
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               422629
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            335944
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          86685
        

</TABLE>
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 235

AN ACT

To allow for the renegotiation of the payment schedule of 

contracts between the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Redwood Valley County Water District, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 235 EH

1 SECTION 1. RENEGOTIATION OF PAYMENT SCHEDULE. 

2 Section 15 of Public Law 100–516 (102 Stat. 2573) 

3 is amended as follows: 

4 (1) By amending paragraph (2) of subsection 

5 (a) to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(2) If, as of January 1, 2006, the Secretary 

7 of the Interior and the Redwood Valley County 

8 Water District have not renegotiated the schedule of 

9 payment, the District may enter into such additional 

10 non-Federal obligations as are necessary to finance 

11 procurement of dedicated water rights and improve12 ments necessary to store and convey those rights to 

13 provide for the District’s water needs. The Secretary 

14 shall reschedule the payments due under loans num15 bered 14–06–200–8423A and 14–06–200–8423A 

16 Amendatory and said payments shall commence 

17 when such additional obligations have been finan18 cially satisfied by the District. The date of the initial 

19 payment owed by the District to the United States 

20 shall be regarded as the start of the District’s repay21 ment period and the time upon which any interest 

22 shall first be computed and assessed under section 

23 5 of the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 (43
3

•HR 235 EH

1 U.S.C. 422a et seq.).’’. 

2 (2) By striking subsection (c). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 235

AN ACT

To allow for the renegotiation of the payment 

Water District, and for other purposes.the Interior and the Redwood Valley County schedule of contracts between the Secretary of
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  25,  2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Mintz,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/David Mintz*
---------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004


     * The originally  executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|   |                         | BISNIS Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  LATEST  NEWS
COUNTRY REPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center  
  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |

|          |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| **Central Asian StatesKazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan TurkmenistanUzbekistan
   *To contact BISNIS, send email to:[email protected]*** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.153 Records of the Office.

Certification is not necessary as a condition to admissibility when the evidence to be submitted is a record of the Office to which all parties have access.